alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 174]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 428]]

Public Law 114-174
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   200 Town Run Lane in Winston Salem, North Carolina, as the ``Maya 
 Angelou Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 13, 2016 -  [H.R. 3735]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MAYA ANGELOU MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 Town Run Lane in Winston Salem, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Maya Angelou Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Maya 
Angelou Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved June 13, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3735:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Mar. 1, considered and passed House.
            May 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Steven W. King, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;







|                       |        
|---------------------- | -------
|Dated: August 28, 2017 | Signed:
|                       |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,317
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,916
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,545
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,545
<LOANS>                                         57,429
<ALLOWANCE>                                        969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,646
<DEPOSITS>                                      81,549
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,217
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                945
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,662
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  93,646
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,525
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  297
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    36
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,858
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 570
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,288
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         450
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.34
<LOANS-NON>                                        110
<LOANS-PAST>                                       449
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    559
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   982
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  996
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               996
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            470


</TABLE>
#### § 423.2120 Filing briefs with the Council.

Upon request, the Council will give the enrollee requesting review a reasonable opportunity to file a brief or other written statement about the facts and law relevant to the case. Unless the enrollee requesting review files the brief or other statement with the request for review, the time beginning with the date of receipt of the request to submit the brief and ending with the date the brief is received by the Council will not be counted toward the adjudication timeframe set forth in § 423.2100. The Council may also request, but not require, CMS, the IRE, and/or the Part D plan sponsor to file a brief or position paper if the Council determines that it is necessary to resolve the issues in the case. The Council cannot draw any adverse inference if CMS, the IRE, and/or the Part D plan sponsor either participates, or decides not to participate in Council review.

[74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5138, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### Joseph RODRIGUEZ, Sr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Don Genung, Sheriff, Pinellas County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 74-1495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Richard A. Lazzara, of Levine, Freedman & Hirsch, Tampa, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for habeas corpus is brought pursuant to Rule 3.130(c)(2), CrPR, and alleges that petitioner’s application for reduction of bail was erroneously denied by the trial court. Bail was set at *306$500,000, and the application for reduction was denied.

We have reviewed the transcript of the reduction hearing and find that much of the testimony in support of the amount of bail set was by police officers testifying as to what various confidential informers had told them. At one point defense counsel requested the name of an informant, which request was denied as was his motion to strike the testimony. Such evidence should have been stricken.1

The remaining testimony introduced at the reduction hearing is not sufficient to support the amount of bail set. We therefore grant this petition for writ of habeas corpus and make it returnable before the trial judge so that a new hearing may be had on the reasonableness of the $500,000 bail previously set.' Such new hearing shall follow the dictates of *Stansel*with respect to the criteria for setting bail.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

1

. *See*Stansel v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 297 So.2d 63; Primm v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 293 So.2d 725.
No. 00-111.

#### Loe *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Certio-rari denied.
HomeDirect Line for American Business...Growing the Fiji Brand: U.S. Services Needed

# 									Growing the Fiji Brand: U.S. Services Needed							

Direct Line Event

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

March 24, 2021

**Topic:** Growing the Fiji Brand: U.S. Services Needed

**Host:**U.S. Charge d’affaires Tony Greubel

**Guest Speakers:** Arif Khan, Acting President of the Fiji-USA Business Council and CEO of Cacao FijiShaneel Nair, Senior Trade and Investment Advisor, Investment Fiji

**Date and Time:** Wednesday, March 24th 4:00 pm (EDT) Thursday, March 25th 9:00 am (Local) ****

**Brief Description of Call:**Join CDA Greubel to explore opportunities for U.S. businesses to help grow the Fiji brand through targeted marketing, B2B matchmaking, and import and biosecurity compliance. From FIJI Water to kava, ginger, turmeric, coffee and cocoa, Fijian exporters seek U.S. expertise to expand their global footprint.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDirect LineFiji

Back to Top
HomeFact Sheets, Press Releases, Remarks – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Fact Sheets for 2023 Trafficking in Persons Report

# 									Fact Sheets for 2023 Trafficking in Persons Report							

Fact Sheet

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

December 15, 2023

The fact sheets are PDF files:
        -  Online Recruitment of Vulnerable Populations for Forced Labor [3 MB] 
        -  Overlooked for Too Long: Boys and Human Trafficking [2 MB] 
        -  Protecting Victims of Trafficking – The Non-Punishment Principle [744 KB] 
        -  Human Trafficking and Cyber Scam Operations [2 MB] 

Tags

Human TraffickingHuman TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Back to Top
### "

ani, RICHARDSON Governor DIANE DENISH Lieutenant Governor

July 23,2010 

### NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

### Air Quality Bureau 1301 Siler Road, Building B, Santa Fe , NM 87507-3113 Phone (505) 476-4300 Fax (505) 476-4375 www.nrnenv.state.nrn.us RON CURRY Secretary SARAH COITRELL Deputy Secretary

Mr. Tom Diggs, Associate Director-Air US EPA Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 1200 Mail 

### Code: 6PD Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Dear Mr
. Digg s: I am writing to clarify our interpretation of the New Mexico Interstate Transport SIP for Implementation of PM 2 .S• In that SIP revi sion, which we submitted in 2007 , we committed to follow the PM 10 Surrogate Policy in place at the time
. Because of court ruling s and resulting adjustments to EPA guidance, you requested that we clarify the reference to the State 's application of EPA's interim guidance on use of PM IO as a surrogate for PM 2.S• The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) requires that applicants include PM 2.S modeling and emissions in PSD and minor source permit applications. New Mexico does not use PM IO as a surrogate for PM 2 .S in our permitting programs . The record for the permitting decision includes an explanation of how PM2.5 emissions have been appropriately analyzed and estimated. If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (505) 476-4301. Sincerely,

MaryUhl Bureau Chief
#### § 405.1050 Removal of a hearing request from OMHA to the Council.

If a request for hearing is pending before OMHA, the Council may assume responsibility for holding a hearing by requesting that OMHA send the hearing request to it. If the Council holds a hearing, it conducts the hearing according to the rules for hearings before an ALJ. Notice is mailed to all parties at their last known address informing them that the Council has assumed responsibility for the case.

[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5118, Jan. 17, 2017]
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Garg, Herro Mustafa – Arabic Republic of Egypt – March 2023

# 									Garg, Herro Mustafa – Arabic Republic of Egypt – March 2023							

Certificate of Competency

April 28, 2023

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

 

SUBJECT:        Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:             The Arab Republic of Egypt

CANDIDATE: Herro Mustafa Garg

Herro Kader Mustafa, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, most recently served as the U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Bulgaria, a position she held since 2019.  Previously, she was the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Lisbon, Portugal and Political Minister Counselor at the U.S. Embassy New Delhi, India.  Earlier, Mustafa worked in the Office of the Vice President on issues related to the Middle East and South and Central Asia.  Other Washington assignments include Deputy Director of the Afghanistan Office; Advisor on the Middle East in the Office of the Under Secretary for Political Affairs; Director for Iran, Israeli-Palestinian Affairs, and Jordan at the National Security Council; and National Security Council Director for Iraq and Afghanistan.  Her overseas postings include lead U.S. Civilian Coordinator in Mosul, Iraq; Consular Officer in Beirut, Lebanon; and Political Officer in Athens, Greece.  Mustafa’s extensive experience working on Middle East issues, her language expertise, her management experience and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams make her a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Egypt.

Mustafa is the recipient of three Senior Foreign Service Performance Awards, multiple Superior Honor Awards and the Matilda W. Sinclaire Award for superior achievement in a foreign language.   She grew up in North Dakota and speaks Kurdish, Arabic, Farsi, Greek, Hindi, Bulgarian, and Portuguese.  Her family story is the subject of the documentary film *American Herro* and in 2021 she was honored by the Carnegie Corporation as one of the Great Immigrants of America.  Mustafa has a Bachelor’s degree from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service and a Master’s degree from Princeton University.

Back to Top
§ 402.210 Notices. ( a ) *Notice of proposed determination to exclude.* When the initiating agency proposes to exclude a person from participation in a Federal health care program in accordance with this part, notice of the proposed determination to exclude must be given in writing, and delivered or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. The written notice must include, at a minimum— ( 1 ) Reference to the statutory basis for the exclusion.
( 2 ) A description of the claims, requests for payment, or incidents for which the exclusion is proposed.
( 3 ) The reason why those claims, requests for payments, or incidents subject the person to an exclusion.
( 4 ) The length of the proposed exclusion.
( 5 ) A description of the circumstances that were considered when determining the period of exclusion.
( 6 ) Instructions for responding to the notice, including a specific statement of the person's right to submit documentary evidence and a written response concerning whether the exclusion is warranted, and any related issues such as potential mitigating circumstances. The notice must specify that— ( i ) The person has the right to request an opportunity to meet with an official of the initiating agency to make an oral presentation; and
( ii ) The request to make an oral presentation must be submitted within 30 days of the receipt of the notice of intent to exclude.
( 7 ) If a person fails, within the time permitted under § 402.212, to exercise the right to respond to the notice of proposed determination to exclude, the initiating agency may initiate actions for the imposition of the exclusion.
( b ) *Notice of exclusion.* Once the initiating agency determines that the exclusion is warranted, a written notice of exclusion is sent to the person in the same manner as described in paragraph (a) of this section. The exclusion is effective 20 days from the date of the notice. The written notice must include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) The basis for the exclusion.
( 2 ) The length of the exclusion and, when applicable, the factors considered in setting the length.
( 3 ) The effect of exclusion.
( 4 ) The earliest date on which the initiating agency considers a request for reinstatement.
( 5 ) The requirements and procedures for reinstatement.
( 6 ) The appeal rights available to the excluded person under part 1005 of this title.
( c ) *Amendment to the notice of exclusion.* No later than 15 days before the final exhibit exchanges required under § 1005.8 of this title, the initiating agency may amend the notice of exclusion if information becomes available that justifies the imposition of a period of exclusion other than the one proposed in the original written notice.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 13543 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:17

- cr - 00046

- RBD

- GJK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DEREK COLEMAN CORKER, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (April 19, 2018) Before MARTIN , JILL PRYOR, and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-13543 Date Filed: 04/19/2018 Page: 1 of 32 Derek Corker appeals his term and conditions of supervised release. On appeal, Corker argues that the district court erred in failing to elicit objections after it imposed its sentence. Ordinarily, when a defendant does not object to the district cour t’s imposition of the term and conditions of supervised release, we will review only for plain error. United States v. Nash , 438 F.3d 1302, 1304 (11th Cir. 2006). If, however, the district court fails to elicit objections after imposing a sentence, we wi ll review the sentence de novo. United States v. Johnson , 451 F.3d 1239, 1242 (11th Cir. 2006). The district court must elicit fully articulated objections, following the imposition of a sentence, to the court’s ultimate findings of fact and conclusions o f law. United States v. Jones , 899 F.2d 1097, 1102 (11th Cir. 1990) , overruled on other grounds , United States v. Morrill , 984 F.2d 1136 (11th Cir. 1993) ( en banc )

. We have held that when the district court merely asks if there is “anything further?” or “anything else?” and neither party responds with objections, then the district court has failed to elicit fully articulated objections, as is required by Jones

. United State s v. Campbell , 473 F.3d 1345, 1348 (11th Cir. 2007). If a district court fails to comply with Jones , we will normally vacate the sentence and remand to the district court to give the parties an opportunity to present their objections. Id. at

Case: 17-13543 Date Filed: 04/19/2018 Page: 2 of 33 1347. Reman ding to the district court is unnecessary if the record on appeal is sufficient to enable review. Id. Here, the district court did not comply with Jones because it did not expressly elicit objections from Corker after imposing Corker’s sentence. Jones , 8 99 F.2d at 1102. Additionally, the district court’s question, “[a]nything else from the defense?” did not satisfy Jones because it did not elicit an objection from Corker. Campbell , 473 F.3d at 1348. A remand is necessary because the record does not ind icate why the district court chose ten years of supervised release, as opposed to the statutory minimum term of five years supervised release, or why it imposed the special conditions on computer use. Campbell , 473 F.3d at 1347. Accordingly, we vacate an d remand for resentencing on the term and conditions of Corker’s supervised release. VACATE AND REMAND. Case: 17-13543 Date Filed: 04/19/2018 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dean
Antonis, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Dean
      AntonisDean
      AntonisTreasurer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
      May 16, 2008











This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3139 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 
Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the 
       ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 
Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the 
       ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 245 Centereach 
Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```