alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          94,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,485,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         360,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,447,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,575,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,929,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,447,833
<SALES>                                     13,760,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,760,791
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,916,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             229,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,615,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,365,160
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,365,160
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
§ 408.53 Change from partial direct remittance to full deduction. If a benefit that was less than the premium (and therefore required direct remittance of the difference) is increased to an amount equal to, or greater than, the premium— ( a ) The full premium is paid from the benefit; and
( b ) Any amounts the enrollee had paid toward premiums not yet due are refunded.
# C_2006036EN.01003401.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/34

---

Action brought on 8 December 2005 — EMC Development v Commission

(Case T-432/05)

(2006/C 36/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): EMC Development AB (Lulea, Sweden) [represented by: M. Elvinger, lawyer]

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission's decision dated 28th September 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint pursuant to Article 3(2) of Council regulation 17/62; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision dated 28th September 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint pursuant to Article 3(2) of Council regulation 17/62;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a corporate body inter alia responsible for the continued testing and further research and development regarding an alternative cement product known as energetically modified cement. The applicant introduced a complaint before the Commission under Regulation 17/62, accusing the European producers of Portland cement (the type of cement which is predominant in the European market) of a series of behaviours constituting serious violations of Article 81 EC. More specifically, the complaint concerned the EN 197-1 standard, adopted in the context of directive 89/106 (1). According to the applicant, this standard was purposefully designed to favour existing major players in the market to the exclusion of other cement producers or market challenging products and technologies. This was allegedly achieved through close cooperation between the technical sub-committee of the European Committee for standardisation and CEMBUREAU, the duly appointed trade association of European cement producers, the vast majority of whose members are well established Portland cement producers.

1

The applicant now challenges the decision rejecting its complaint. It alleges that the offending standard amounts to a horizontal cooperation agreement in violation of Article 81 EC. In the alternative, the applicant contends that the standard breaches the aims of Articles 28 and 29 EC and cannot, in any event, be justified at a Member State level under Article 30 EC.

---

(1)  Council Directive 89/106 of 21 December 1998 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to Construction products, OJ L 40 11.12.1989, p.12

1

---
HomeStatus Lists for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Finance Status Lists

# 						Finance Status Lists					

2 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year1944

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeDepositary – Treaty Affairs

          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		01. Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		02. Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.	   

Back to Top
Exhibit
      32.2





Certification
of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of
operations as of and for the periods covered therein.








/s/J.
      Kimbrough DavisJ.
      Kimbrough DavisExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer





Date:
November 6, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


-42-
#### Eston BULLARD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 28, 1975.

H. Randolph Fallin, Millar, Fallin & Lally, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew J. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the thorough and well reasoned order of the trial judge giving rise to this appeal together *558with the rest of the record on appeal and the briefs of appellant and the State. We do not find it here necessary to determine whether writs of coram nobis have been abolished in criminal actions. (See Rule 1.540(b) RCP; Rule 3.610 RCrP, and Rule 3.850 RCrP) In any event, it is apparent that the procedure employed sub judice was consistent with all constitutional requirements, including- due process and that the action of the trial judge complained of did not constitute an abuse of his discretion.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the order appealed is

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J., and STEWART, LEON F., Associate Judge, concur.
#### MOBILE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF LEISURE LAKE VILLAGE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Marvin L. COWART and Harlton Cowart, d/b/a Leisure Lake Mobile Home Village, Appellees.

No. 74-63.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2006126EN.01001002.xml

| 30.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4100 — Seagate/Maxtor)

(2006/C 126/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4100. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4100. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 416.47 Condition for coverage—Medical records. The ASC must maintain complete, comprehensive, and accurate medical records to ensure adequate patient care. ( a ) *Standard: Organization.* The ASC must develop and maintain a system for the proper collection, storage, and use of patient records.
( b ) *Standard: Form and content of record.* The ASC must maintain a medical record for each patient. Every record must be accurate, legible, and promptly completed. Medical records must include at least the following: ( 1 ) Patient identification.
( 2 ) Significant medical history and results of physical examination (as applicable).
( 3 ) Pre-operative diagnostic studies (entered before surgery), if performed.
( 4 ) Findings and techniques of the operation, including a pathologist's report on all tissues removed during surgery, except those exempted by the governing body.
( 5 ) Any allergies and abnormal drug reactions.
( 6 ) Entries related to anesthesia administration.
( 7 ) Documentation of properly executed informed patient consent.
( 8 ) Discharge diagnosis.
[47 FR 34094, Aug. 5, 1982, as amended at 84 FR 51814, Sept. 30, 2019]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03561

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 403.300 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements section 1886(c) of the Act, which authorizes payment for Medicare inpatient hospital services in accordance with a State's reimbursement control system rather than under the Medicare reimbursement principles as described in CMS's regulations and instructions.
( b ) *Purpose.* Contained in this subpart are— ( 1 ) The basic requirements that a State reimbursement control system must meet in order to be approved by CMS;
( 2 ) A description of CMS's review and evaluation procedures; and
( 3 ) The conditions that apply if the system is approved.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3188

To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit the applicability of hazardous

material transportation registration and fee requirements for persons

who offer crude oil and condensate for transport in commerce, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1996

Mr. COMBEST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit the applicability of hazardous material transportation registration

and fee requirements for persons who offer crude oil

and condensate for transport in commerce, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crude Oil Transpor5 tation Fairness Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3188 IH

1 SEC. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION REG2 ISTRATION AND FEE REQUIREMENTS.

3 Section 5108(a) of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(5)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

6 a person who offers crude oil and condensate for transport

7 in commerce shall not be required to file a registration

8 statement or pay a fee otherwise required under this sec9 tion if the person transfers title to the crude oil to the

10 transporter at the time that the crude oil is initially trans11 ported in commerce from a storage location by the trans12 porter.

13 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to any person

14 who transports crude oil and condensate in commerce in

15 a quantity that is subject to the requirements of this sec16 tion.’’.

17 SEC. 3. MAXIMUM ANNUAL REGISTRATION FEE.

18 The second sentence of section 5108(g)(2)(A) of title

19 49, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘at least

20 $250 but not more than $5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not more

21 than $250’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,654]


Delong Sportswear, Pella, IA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on July 14, 
2009 by an Iowa State Workforce Official on behalf of workers of DeLong 
Sportswear, Pella, Iowa.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Accordingly, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of August 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-20469 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2006145EN.01001402.xml

| 21.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4151 — Orica/Dyno)

(2006/C 145/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 23 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4151. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4151. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006086EN.01002502.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 January 2006 — Giulietti v Commission

(Case T-293/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Open competition - Exclusion from the competition - Illegality of the competition notice - Inadmissibility - Professional experience - Full-time activity)

(2006/C 86/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carla Giulietti (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P.-P. Van Gehuchten, J. Sambon and P.Reyniers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Application for

Annulment, firstly, of the decision of the selection board for competition COM/A/6/01 to exclude the applicant from that competition on the ground of lack of professional experience, communicated by letter of 16 October 2002; secondly, of the confirmatory decision of that selection board, following an application for reconsideration submitted by the applicant, communicated by letter of 21 November 2002, and, thirdly, of the express decision rejecting the complaint of 11 June 2003.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003

1

---
# C_2006060EN.01000901.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-37/05: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/337/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/11/EC - Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment - Consents granted without assessment)

(2006/C 60/17)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-37/05, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. van Beek, assisted by F. Louis and A. Capobianco, avocats) v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: C. White) — Action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 31 January 2005 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and P. Kūris, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, in failing to correctly transpose Articles 2(1) and 4 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in failing to correctly transpose Articles 2(1) and 4 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
# C_2006108EN.01000802.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/8

---

Action brought on 3 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-127/06)

(2006/C 108/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that Directive;

1

| — | order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementing Directive 2002/65/EC expired on 9 October 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 271, p.16

1

---