alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2006105EN.01000201.xml

| 4.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 105/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 105/2

---

NOTICE OF VACANCY FOR A POST OF DIRECTOR

NOTICE OF VACANCY FOR A POST OF DIRECTOR

Reference: A/035

(2006/C 105 A/02)

The General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union is seeking to fill a vacant post of Director in the Legal/Linguistic Experts Directorate at the General Secretariat of the Council.

a vacant post

The successful candidate will be offered a contract as an official in category A*, grade 14.

He or she will be in charge of the Legal/Linguistic Experts Directorate and will be responsible, under the authority of the Director‐General, for ensuring the harmonisation and finalisation of European Union legislation in all the official EU languages, following the rules for good legislative drafting. To that end, he or she will be responsible for contacts and coordination with the Council Presidency, the European Parliament and the Commission and with the other departments of the General Secretariat of the Council.

Further information and an application form can be obtained by contacting the Recruitment Department at the following e-mail address:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

or via its website at

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

31 May 2006, the postmark serving as proof.

---
#### § 700.6 Nuisances.

The use of loud, abusive, or profane language, except as part of an authorized practical training exercise, unwarranted loitering, unauthorized assembly, the creation of any hazard to persons or things, improper disposal of rubbish, or the commission of any disorderly conduct on the property is prohibited. Prohibited actions in the preceding sentence are limited to those actions which impede, obstruct, or otherwise interfere with the Government's business which includes, among other things, the maintenance of the facility, protection of persons and property, and the smooth administration of academic activities and supporting services. The entry, without specific permission, upon any part of the property to which authorized visitors do not customarily have access, is prohibited.
#### CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, etc., Petitioner, v. UNION DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES, INC., and Herbert D. Katz, as trustee, Respondents.

No. 45839.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 4, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 294 So.2d 725.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Effects of Acoustic Treatment on Pressure Disturbances From a Supersonic Jet in a Circular DuctThe pressure disturbances generated by an instability wave in the shear layer of a supersonic jet are studied for an axisymmetric jet inside a lined circular duct. For the supersonic jet, locally linear stability analysis with duct wall boundary conditions is used to calculate the eigenvalues and the eigenfunctions at each axial location. These values are used to determine the growth rates and phase velocities of the instability waves and the near field pressure disturbance patterns. The study is confined to the dominant Kelvin-Helmholtz instability mode and to the region just downstream of the nozzle exit where the shear layer is growing but is still small in size compared to the radius of the duct. Numerical results are used to study the effects of changes in the outer flow, growth in the shear layer thickness, wall distance, and wall impedance, and the effects of these changes on non-axisymmetric modes. The primary results indicate that the effects of the duct wall on stability characteristics diminish as the outer flow increases and as the jet azimuthal mode number increases. Also, wall reflections are reduced when using a finite impedance boundary condition at the wall; but in addition, reflections are reduced and growth rates diminished by keeping the imaginary part of the impedance negative when using the negative exponential for the harmonic dependence.Document ID19970009619Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsDahl, Milo D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107358E-10513NAS 1.15:107358Meeting InformationMeeting: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and ExpositionLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: November 17, 1996End Date: November 22, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N15020Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009619.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### James DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 47909.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 26, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed sua sponte. 314 So.2d 659.
# C_2006022EN.01002501.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/25

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Rica Foods v Commission

(Case T -242/01) (1)

1

(2006/C 22/45)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 3, 5.1.2002.

1

---
# C_2006036EN.01003101.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 November 2005 — Deutsche Post and Securicor Omega Express v Commission

(Case T-343/03) (1)

1

(State aid - Article 88(3) EC - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Complaint - Rejection - Lack of subject matter)

(2006/C 36/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) and Securicor Omega Express (Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz, N. Khan and M. Niejahr, Agents)

Defendant:

Party intervening in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: M. Bethell, Agent)

Party intervening in support of the defendant:

Application for

Annulment of Commission Decision C (2003) 1652 final of 27 May 2003, which states that the measures which the United Kingdom authorities propose to adopt for Post Office Ltd are compatible with the common market (State aid N 784/2002)

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

| 3. | The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear its own costs of intervention. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear its own costs of intervention.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 10.1.2004.

1

---
No. 99-493.

#### Green et ux. *v.*Levis Motors, Inc., dba Levis Mitsubishi, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Economic Sanctions Programs

# 						Economic Sanctions Programs					

							The Office of Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation (EB/TFS/SPI) is responsible for developing and implementing foreign policy-related sanctions adopted to counter threats to national security posed by particular activities and countries. SPI builds international support for implementation of economic sanctions, provides foreign policy guidance to the Department of Treasury and Commerce on sanctions implementation, and works with Congress to draft legislation that advances U.S. foreign policy goals in these areas. SPI maintains and enforces sanctions to maximize their economic impact on our targets and minimize the damage to U.S. economic interests. We also work to remove economic sanctions when appropriate to reward and incentivize improved behavior or demonstrate U.S. support for newly established democratic governments. In addition, SPI conducts outreach on sanctions issues to a wide range of interested parties including NGOs, companies, diaspora groups, and others.						

		Subscribe		

21 items

          -    		Licensing	   

previous page123

Back to Top
#### Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Attorney General. (Re Blanchard Woodrow GRIFFIN, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama).

79-462.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1980.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                               AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 11


                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE



                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                      January 31,
                                              2 0 0 3          2 0 0 2
                                              -------          -------

Basic and diluted earnings:
  Net loss                                 $ (296,450)       $ (496,509)

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding        2,594,453         2,565,606
                                           ----------        ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding           2,594,453         2,565,606
                                           ----------        ----------

Basic and diluted loss per common share    $     (.11)       $     (.19)
                                           ==========        ==========










_____________________________
(continued from previous page)
(continued on next page)
# Spain

125 items

        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Spain	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Spain	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Spain	  January 13, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (19-1127) – Amendment of Double Taxation Agreement of February 22, 1990	   
        -    Report  		Spain	  June 27, 2019 
        -    Report  		Spain	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Spain	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Spain	  April 25, 2019 
        -    Report  		Spain	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Spain	  July 19, 2018 

previous page1…8910111213next page

Back to Top
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS MANUALMRB REPORT**Dec 07/2011 MRB−66** **Page 1 of 1**TEMPORARY REVISION MRB−66The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Dash 8 Maintenance Review Board (MRB) Chairman, Transport Canada CivilAviation, and MRB members, FAA and EASAThe technical changes incorporated into this Temporary Revision were taken from Change Evaluation Form (CEF) number(s): CEF−DHC8−683**FILING INSTRUCTIONS:**This Temporary Revision revises PSM 1−84−7 Maintenance Requirements Manual,MRB ReportPart 1, Section 1−32,Systems/Powerplant Maintenance Program. Put this Temporary Revision after 1−32, page 4.Recordthis Temporary Revision number and the date inserted, on the RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS pageat the front of Part 1, of this manual.Keep this Temporary Revision until the normal revision service puts this information into the MaintenanceRequirements Manual or the TR is cancelled.**REASON FOR ISSUE:**This Temporary Revision adds Task 323100−202.**ACTION:**In Section 1−32 page 4, add new Task 323100−202, as follows:

!"#$!%&&!'()*)(+#$!)(%!!'"),()#--(!"*%.)%"!&&!'((!/#"+0#-%#12223..-'()#-%4!'#&(4!)--$)-/!"5,%#'!%+('43 #(#$6789#"#(#$:67;9-$!<!-(1;=222.>#";2#-(4;
HomeStart Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance...DOD Civilian – Medical Clearances

# 									DOD Civilian – Medical Clearances							

We’ve restructured our guidance, check out our updated Start Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance page for the latest information.

Tags

Bureau of Medical ServicesHealth InformationUnder Secretary for Management

Back to Top
## Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s

Rulemakin g Documen t Title : t^lOD^Miiy^nfi^ ^ ^ n-Jh C ^4Si > a f DiMkU M / ^ F/^S^ ^ 0 ^

Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) ; 1 . E.O . 12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g (initia l appropriat e linel :

______Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . 

## i / N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) afte r it wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Faimes s Ac t fo r th e submissio no f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t i naccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l aj)propriat e line) :

Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 fo r transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . 

# /^^/^/^/t^Z^ ^ Signatur e Nam e Title/Offic e 

# (^l/z^/i t Dat e
#### § 136.353 Reports and records.

For each fiscal year during which an urban Indian organization receives or expends funds pursuant to a contract under this title, such organization shall submit to the Secretary a report including information gathered pursuant to § 136.350(a) (7) and (8) of this subdivision, information on activities conducted by the organization pursuant to the contract, an accounting of the amounts and purposes for which Federal funds were expended, and such other information as the Secretary may request. The reports and records of the urban Indian organization with respect to such contract shall be subject to audit by the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States.

[42 FR 59646, Nov. 18, 1977. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002]
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.21 Limitations on services of a chiropractor. ( a ) *Qualifications for chiropractors.* ( 1 ) A chiropractor licensed or authorized to practice before July 1, 1974, and an individual who began studies in a chiropractic college before that date, must have— ( i ) Had preliminary education equal to the requirements for graduation from an accredited high school or other secondary school;
( ii ) Graduated from a college of chiropractic approved by the State's chiropractic examiners after completing a course of study covering a period of not less than 3 school years of 6 months each year in actual continuous attendance and covering adequate courses of study in the subjects of anatomy, physiology, symptomatology and diagnosis, hygiene and sanitation, chemistry, histology, pathology, and principles and practice of chiropractic, including clinical instruction in vertebral palpation, nerve tracing and adjusting; and
( iii ) Passed an examination prescribed by the State's chiropractic examiners covering the subjects specified in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section.
( 2 ) A chiropractor first licensed or authorized to practice after June 30, 1974, and an individual who begins studies in a chiropractic college after that date, must have— ( i ) Had preliminary education equal to the requirements for graduation from an accredited high school or other secondary school;
( ii ) Satisfactorily completed 2 years of pre-chiropractic study at the college level;
( iii ) Satisfactorily completed a 4-year course of 8 months each year offered by a college or school of chiropractic approved by the State's chiropractic examiners and including at least 4,000 hours in courses in anatomy, physiology, symptomatology and diagnosis, hygiene and sanitation, chemistry, histology, pathology, principles and practice of chiropractic, and clinical instruction in vertebral palpation, nerve tracing and adjusting, plus courses in the use and effect of X-ray and chiropractic analysis;
( iv ) Passed an examination prescribed by the State's chiropractic examiners covering the subjects specified in paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section; and
( v ) Attained 21 years of age.
( b ) *Limitations on services.* ( 1 ) Medicare Part B pays only for a chiropractor's manual manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation if the subluxation has resulted in a neuromusculoskeletal condition for which manual manipulation is appropriate treatment.
( 2 ) Medicare Part B does not pay for X-rays or other diagnostic or therapeutic services furnished or ordered by a chiropractor.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 64 FR 59439, Nov. 2, 1999. Redesignated at 66 FR 55328, Nov. 1, 2001]
# C_2006029EN.01001202.xml

| 4.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4065 — BS Investimenti/MCC Sofipa/IP Cleaning)

(2006/C 29/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Catherine J. Hensberry, Plaintiff, *v.*Mary S. Clark, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Onondaga Special Term,

March, 1898.)

{Pleading — 'Services — Denial upon information and belief.

A denial, upon information and belief, is proper in an action for services and particularly, in a case, where the claim is made that the defendant was not in a suitable mental condition to have made the contract claimed by the plaintiff.

Motion to strike out answer as frivolous and sham.

F. W. Talbot, for motion.

George D. Cowles, opposed.

Hiscock, J.

The action is brought to recover for services claimed to have been performed for and at the special instance and request of defendant. The answer is a denial upon information and belief of every allegation in the complaint, and the granting of the motion is urged upon the theory that the answer is sham rather than frivolous. It is claimed that a defendant may not properly deny upon information .and belief allegations of facts which are to be assumed to be within his personal knowledge. ■

*38I think' that, under the -circumstances of this case at least, the motion should he denied.

A denial upon information and belief is -good as a matter of form merely. Bennett v. Leeds Mfg. Co., 110 N. Y. 150.

An answer so denying has been held good where it would appear that the defendants were chargeable with personal knowledge of the matters in controversy. Harvey v. Walker, 59 Hun, 114.

But in this case the presumption, which might otherwise prevail, that defendant had personal knowledge of the matters set forth in the complaint and, therefore, should deny, if at all, absolutely and not upon information and belief, is rebutted by the affidavits read in her behalf upon this motion. It appears from them that her mental condition was such, -during the time when plaintiff’s contract is said, to have been made with her and in'part performed, that she cannot remember what took place. In fact, it is claimed that she was not in a suitable mental condition to have made the contract claimed by plaintiff. Under these1 circumstances and if she was .not in mental condition] to make a contract she very likely might have relied upon that as a defense and have denied.as matter of law' that she" did make the contract claimed by plaintiff even though she had gone through the form of so doing. ' Upon the other hand,' however, it was proper for her,to deny as a matter of information and belief that she went through- the form even of making the contract.

The motion is, therefore, denied, with $10 costs to defendant to abide event. "

Motion denied, with $10 costs to defendant to abide event.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 2

- 41 79

_____________________________
E DWARD L YDELL S PAULDING , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. William E. Davis
, Judge

. February 7, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, and Daren L. Shippy , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 417.931 [Reserved]