alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Egypt (21-1130) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions

# 									Egypt (21-1130) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 30, 2021

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Cairo November 30, 2021; entered into force November 30, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesEgyptTreaties

Back to Top
#### § 136.411 Are the requirements for IHS adjudication different from the requirements for Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations?

Yes, in conducting background investigations and adjudicating eligibility for employment in Tribal positions that allow regular contact with or control over Indian children, Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations may, but are not required to, adopt portions of the rules in this subpart that are specifically applicable to employment with the IHS.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 325 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 325

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 1995

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for 
  the reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in 
ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP REDUCTION.

    Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(B) The State may also, in its discretion, submit a 
        revision at any time requiring employers in such area to 
        implement programs to reduce work-related vehicle trips and 
        miles travelled by employees. Such revision shall be developed 
        in accordance with guidance issued by the Administrator 
        pursuant to section 108(f) and may require that employers in 
        such area increase average passenger occupancy per vehicle in 
        commuting trips between home and the workplace during peak 
        travel periods. The guidance of the Administrator may specify 
        average vehicle occupancy rates which vary for locations within 
        a nonattainment area (suburban, center city, business district) 
        or among nonattainment areas reflecting existing occupancy 
        rates and the availability of high occupancy modes. Any State 
        required to submit a revision under this subparagraph (as in 
        effect before the date of enactment of this sentence) 
        containing provisions requiring employers to reduce work-
        related vehicle trips and miles travelled by employees may, in 
        accordance with State law, remove such provisions from the 
        implementation plan, or withdraw its submission, if the State 
        notifies the Administrator, in writing, that the State has 
        undertaken, or will undertake, one or more alternative methods 
        that will achieve emission reductions equivalent to those to be 
        achieved by the removed or withdrawn provisions.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2006036EN.01001702.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/17

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-88/05: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/59/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 36/33)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-88/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Huttunen and K. Simonsson) v Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to comply with obligations, brought on 18 February 2005 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 93 of 16.04.2005

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Diane L. Kelleher, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|      | 
|Name: |  | /s/ Diane L. Kelleher                               
|Title |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | August 8, 2006
# C_2005229EN.01002203.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/22

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 June 2005

in Case T-147/04: Brian Ross v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Action for annulment and for damages - Career development report - Total and permanent invalidity - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 229/49)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-147/04: Brian Ross, resident in Morpeth (United Kingdom), represented by É. Boigelot, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Curall and G. Berscheid, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for, first, the annulment of the applicant's career development report for the assessment year 2001/2002 and second, damages — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 168 of 26.6.2004.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois Foreign Minister Sylvestre Radegonde

# 											Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois Foreign Minister Sylvestre Radegonde									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 31, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

During a meeting yesterday at the Fourth Conference on Small Island Developing States in Antigua and Barbuda, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma and Foreign Minister Sylvestre Radegonde discussed the shared commitment of the United States and Seychelles to tackling climate change. Deputy Secretary Verma lauded Seychelles’ inspiring engagement on climate issues, including President Ramkalawan’s leadership of SIDS DOCK, an organization composed of small island developing states finding innovative ways to sustainably power their economies. They also discussed maritime security in the Western Indian Ocean, engagement on shared priorities in the Indian Ocean Rim Association and the Indian Ocean Commission, and the opportunities the newly opened U.S. Embassy in Victoria to deepen the strong ties between the two countries. Deputy Secretary Verma expressed great appreciation for Seychelles’ leadership in regional security, to include its willingness to prosecute piracy and its participation in the Combined Maritime Task Force (CMF) and Operation Prosperity Guardian (OPG).

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsClimate ChangeOffice of the SpokespersonSeychelles

Back to Top
Exhibit 21


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            SUBSIDIARIES OF MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company")



                                                                                            Percentage owned by the
                   Name                             Jurisdiction of Organization                    Company
<S>                                         <C>                                          <C>
1.   Merrimac International, Inc., FSC                 Virgin Islands, U.S.A.                        100%

2.   508790 N.B. Inc.                             Province of New Brunswick, Canada                  100%

3.   Filtran Microcircuits Inc.                   Province of New Brunswick, Canada                  100%

4.   Industrias Merrimac Incorporada, S.A.                   Costa Rica                              100%

5.   Mutli-Mix(R)Microtechnology, S.R.L.                      Costa Rica                             100%
</TABLE>
#### Carrie DILLON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Lee Dillon, Jr., deceased, Appellant, v. Karen Michele McELYEA and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. TT-326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1980.

ORDER

On September 16, 1980, appellant was directed to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the appellate rules. Appellant’s initial brief had not been filed at that time though it was to have been served on or before March 27, 1980. In response to our order, appellant filed her initial brief and stated that "... this matter has been delayed in an attempt to reach a resolution of the issues raised by the litigation.”

Although we do not find this response establishes good cause for appellant’s fail*1203ure to comply with the appellate rules, we do not believe that appellant should be punished for dereliction of her counsel. See *Winstead v. Adams,*363 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). However, appellant’s attorney, PAUL M. HARDEN, is hereby reprimanded for his flagrant abuse of the appellate process.

The show cause order is discharged and the appeal will proceed to a conclusion on its merits in accordance with the appellate rules.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  November-30-1996
<CASH>                        1,739,498
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 134,924
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        29,824,136
<DEPRECIATION>                (11,944,782)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                20,368,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,034,540
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    19,334,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  20,368,694
<SALES>                       3,660,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,780,952
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              3,041,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           739,910
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  739,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 7.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                 7.33
        

</TABLE>
# Kuwait

92 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Kuwait	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Kuwait	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kuwait	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		POWER Project Pipeline	   
        -    Report  		Kuwait	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Kuwait	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Kuwait	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Kuwait	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Kuwait	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Kuwait (19-210) – Customs Administration Agreement	   

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top
SUBSIDIARIES OF MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company")


                                                              Percentage owned
           NAME                Jurisdiction of Organization    by the Company  
           ----                ----------------------------    ----------------
 1.  Merrimac International,          Virgin Islands,
     Inc., FSC                            U.S.A.                     100%

 2.  Merrimac Industries                Province of
     (Ontario) Ltd.                   Ontario, Canada                100%

 3.  Industrias Merrimac
     Incorporada, S.A.                   Costa Rica                  100%

 4.  Merrimac Europe Limited           United Kingdom                100%


                                      -1-
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 233--161]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

September 2, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380, Commission staff has reviewed the 
application for amendment of license for the Pit 3, 4, and 5 Project 
(FERC No. 233) and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA). The 
project is located on the Pit River, in Shasta County, California and 
occupies 746 acres of lands of the United States administered by the 
Forest Supervisors of the Shasta-Trinity and Lassen National Forests.
    The EA contains the Commission staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental effects of the proposed addition of new generating 
capacity and construction of a new powerhouse and concludes that 
authorizing the amendment, with appropriate environmental protective 
measures would not constitute a major Federal action that would 
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. On August 
27, 2009, the Commission issued the Order Amending License which 
authorized the construction and operation of the Britton Powerhouse.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Room 2-A of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary'' link. 
Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket 
number field to access the document. Additional information about the 
project is available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, 
at (202) 502-6088, or on the Commission's Web site using the eLibrary 
link. For assistance with eLibrary, contact <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a3a0b7a6aa8b898c8b80b69095958a9791a583809786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a> 
or toll-free at (866) 208-3676; for TTY contact (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21734 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2006074EN.01003203.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 January 2006 — MobilCom v Commission

(Case T -397/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 74/61)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFactors Influencing Pitot Probe Centerline Displacement in a Turbulent Supersonic Boundary LayerWhen a total pressure probe is used for measuring flows with transverse total pressure gradients, a displacement of the effective center of the probe is observed (designated Delta). While this phenomenon is well documented in incompressible flow and supersonic laminar flow, there is insufficient information concerning supersonic turbulent flow. In this study, three NASA Lewis Research Center Supersonic Wind Tunnels (SWT's) were used to investigate pitot probe centerline displacement in supersonic turbulent boundary layers. The relationship between test conditions and pitot probe centerline displacement error was to be determined. For this investigation, ten circular probes with diameter-to-boundary layer ratios (D/delta) ranging from 0.015 to 0.256 were tested in the 10 ft x 10 ft SWT, the 15 cm x 15 cm SWT, and the 1 ft x 1 ft SWT. Reynolds numbers of 4.27 x 10(exp 6)/m, 6.00 x 10(exp 6)/in, 10.33 x 10(exp 6)/in, and 16.9 x 10(exp 6)/m were tested at nominal Mach numbers of 2.0 and 2.5. Boundary layer thicknesses for the three tunnels were approximately 200 mm, 13 mm, and 30 mm, respectively. Initial results indicate that boundary layer thickness, delta, and probe diameter, D/delta play a minimal role in pitot probe centerline offset error, Delta/D. It appears that the Mach gradient, dM/dy, is an important factor, though the exact relationship has not yet been determined. More data is needed to fill the map before a conclusion can be drawn with any certainty. This research provides valuable supersonic, turbulent boundary layer data from three supersonic wind tunnels with three very different boundary layers. It will prove a valuable stepping stone for future research into the factors influencing pitot probe centerline offset error.Document ID19970010088Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGrosser, Wendy I.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberE-10484NASA-TM-107341NAS 1.15:107341Accession Number97N15323Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010088.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We have
issued our report dated March 14, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements (which includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the application
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 123(R) and 158 as of
December 31, 2006) and our report dated March 14, 2008 accompanying management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Harleysville National Corporation and
Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration
Statements of Harleysville National Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-69784,
effective October 1, 1993, File No. 333-17813, effective December 13, 1996, File
No. 333-79971, effective June 4, 1999, and File No. 333-79973, effective June 4,
1999, File No. 333-116183, effective June 4, 2004, File No. 333-139579,
effective December 21, 2006, File No. 333-148377, effective December 28, 2007).

|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP           | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania
|March 14,
      2008            

---