alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           14198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16006
<PP&E>                                           58740
<DEPRECIATION>                                   26810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   48222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1229
<BONDS>                                          42867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        4126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     48222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 58572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  42121
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              42121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    748
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     42869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   303.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   303.15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATION**I, Donita R. Koval, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of OmegaFinancial Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report..        Date: 04/04/2008 /s/ Donita R. Koval   Donita R. Koval   Chief Executive Officer  
29
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Joseph J. Lazzara certify that: 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 28, 2006		
/s/ Joseph J. Lazzara
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Ronald
E. Kimbrough, Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough

Ronald E. Kimbrough
Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                 TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                EXHIBIT 11.3

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  ----------------------------------------


                                       Nine Months Ended             Three Months Ended
                                           July 31,                        July 31,
                                         (Unaudited)                     (Unaudited)
                                   2 0 0 0        1 9 9 9          2 0 0 0        1 9 9 9
                                   -------        -------          -------        -------

<S>                         <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>

Basic earnings:
Net income (loss)              $  (784,117)    $  (108,973)     $    45,262    $   100,731

Shares:
  Weighted common shares
   outstanding                   2,397,292       2,141,801        2,559,458      2,141,801
  Warrants to consultants               --              --               --             --
  Warrants to lender                    --              --               --             --
  Employee and director
   stock options                        --              --               --             --
  Consultant stock options              --              --               --             --
                               -----------     -----------      -----------    -----------

Total weighted shares
 outstanding                     2,397,292       2,141,801        2,559,458      2,141,801
                               -----------     -----------      -----------    -----------

Basic earnings
 per common share              $      (.33)    $      (.05)     $       .02    $       .05
                               ===========     ===========      ===========    ===========

Diluted earnings:
Net income (loss)              $  (784,117)    $  (108,973)     $    45,262    $   100,731

Shares:
  Weighted common shares
   outstanding                   2,397,292       2,141,801        2,559,458      2,141,801
  Warrants to consultants               --              --               --          9,683
  Warrants to lender                    --              --           89,160        243,376
  Employee and director
   stock options                        --              --            2,098          5,767
  Consultant stock options              --              --               --          2,103
                               -----------     -----------      -----------    -----------

Total weighted shares
 outstanding                     2,397,292       2,141,801        2,650,716      2,402,730
                               -----------     -----------      -----------    -----------

Diluted earnings
 per common share              $      (.33)    $      (.05)     $       .02    $       .04
                               ===========     ===========      ===========    ===========


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 410

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

#### § 410.22 Limitations on services of an optometrist.

Medicare Part B pays for the services of a doctor of optometry, which he or she is legally authorized to perform in the State in which he or she performs them, if the services are among those described in section 1861(s) of the Act and § 410.10 of this part.

[64 FR 59439, Nov. 2, 1999. Redesignated at 66 FR 55328, Nov. 1, 2001]
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases

on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-50253

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

BILLY DALE CARTER,

BILLY FRANK DAVIS, and

MOSES PRINCE, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

VERSUS

JOE GONZALES, WARDEN, ET AL,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(SA-94-CV-987)

______________________________________________________

November 13, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

The only issue before this court is the propriety of the

district court's order denying injunctive relief to plaintiffs.

Inmates Billy Dale Carter, Billy Frank Davis, and Moses Prince sued

several officials of the Dolph Briscoe Unit of the Texas prison

system. Plaintiffs alleged that, although they had tested positive

for hepatitis C, defendants failed to conduct followup liver

assessments or refer them for specialized care. They sought
 

2 Billy Dale Carter has also filed a motion for relief and

settlement memorandum which is unrelated to the limited issues

pending before this court related to plaintiff's claim for

injunctive relief. The motion is therefore denied.

2

monetary damages and an order directing prison officials to provide

them with immediate treatment. While this suit was pending,

plaintiffs filed a number of motions. In one of these they

asserted that prison officials had retaliated against them for

instituting suit and asked the district court to remove them from

state custody, or at least from the Dolph Briscoe Unit, for the

duration of the litigation. The magistrate judge determined that

plaintiffs had not alleged sufficient facts to support these

allegations. On his recommendation, the district court denied all

motions for injunctive relief. Plaintiff Carter filed this appeal.

This court will not reverse a district court's decision to

grant or deny a motion for a preliminary injunction absent a

showing of abuse of discretion. Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d

1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). The only fact offered to support

Carter's claim of retaliation is the timing of a major disciplinary

report filed against him; he was accused of threatening defendant

Waldrum only ten days after the plaintiffs served their

interrogatories. Presented with only this evidence, the district

court concluded that Carter had not demonstrated a substantial

threat that irreparable injury would result from its failure to

grant an injunction.2 The district court did not abuse its

discretion in so holding.

AFFIRMED.
3
# C_2006060EN.01003302.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-63/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/68)

(Language of the case: Greek)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 14 December 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-63/05: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 02. 04. 2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                            5

<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                   <C>

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR

<CASH>                                      98,657

<SECURITIES>                                     0

<RECEIVABLES>                            7,590,038

<ALLOWANCES>                               460,475

<INVENTORY>                              7,453,189

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        16,011,127

<PP&E>                                 112,509,247

<DEPRECIATION>                          46,328,486

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          84,380,050

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   12,344,121

<BONDS>                                  8,717,519



<COMMON>                                   961,132

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<OTHER-SE>                              33,531,034

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            84,380,000

<SALES>                                 89,781,276

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        90,372,182

<CGS>                                   81,504,785

<TOTAL-COSTS>                           83,227,871

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           215,881

<LOSS-PROVISION>                            68,288

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,169,766

<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,758,664

<INCOME-TAX>                                     0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,758,664

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                            408,548

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                             4,167,212

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 4.46

<EPS-DILUTED>                                 4.46

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:



(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the
Registrant).



(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| |  |  | Amendment no. 3 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       | 
|Name:  |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | August 8, 2005
# C_2006036EN.01003001.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 November 2005 — Vanlangendonck v Commission

(Case T-361/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Open competition - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Infringement of the competition notice - Equality of treatment)

(2006/C 36/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Philippe Vanlangendonck (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: B. Laurent, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent)

Defendant(s):

Application for

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition COM/A/10/01 not to include the applicant on the reserve list of that competition and for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 10.1.2004.

1

---
#### ROSE DROTAR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Argued May 24, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the appellants, *Kenneth J. Dawes.*

For the respondents, *John A. Hartpence*and *B. Thorn Lord.*

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker, in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— Hone.
HomeNew Zealand

# New Zealand

115 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 11, 2024Harry S. Truman BuildingWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Australian and New Zealand Counterparts	  April 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Australia and New Zealand	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		New Zealand National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 6, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Announces 2024 Spring Season of Next Level	  February 1, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		First Counter-Drone FVEY Policy Forum Workshop Furthers Cooperation in Countering Emerging Technology Threats	  December 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Finkenauer’s Travel to Australia and New Zealand	  November 7, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		October 10 briefing with Ambassador Julianne Smith, U.S. Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)	  October 10, 2023Brussels Media Hub 

123…12next page

Back to Top
From: Rahul Pendse [RPendse@trinityconsultants.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:05 AM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness (Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com); Fortin, 

Kelly

Subject: Discoverer Spirit EGOM PSD/Title V Permit Application - Revised GHG 

Emission Calculations

Attachments: Discoverer Spirit Title V Application Addendum Appendix F Drilling Scenario -

Revised GHG Emissions.pdf; Discoverer Spirit Title V Application Addendum 

Appendix E Well Completion Scenario - Revised GHG Emissions.pdf

Hello Eva,

Per our phone discussion, please find revised Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission calculations for 

Anadarko’s Discoverer Spirit PSD-Title V Application. The revisions reflect the revised Global Warming 

Potentials per EPA’s “Final Rule: 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and 

Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data Elements”, which became 

effective on January 1, 2014. As discussed, attached are:

 Table 13 of Appendix E - Revised GHG emissions summary page including GHG emissions from 

each equipment for all operating scenarios during well completion scenario

 Table 13 of Appendix F - Revised GHG emissions summary page including GHG emissions from 

each equipment during drilling scenario

Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification. Thanks for your help!

................................................................................................................

Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants – Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225-346-4003 | Mobile: 714-454-0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________