alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

COMMON CATALOGUE OF AGRICULTURAL PLANT SPECIES

First supplement to the 24th complete edition

(2006/C 80 A/01)

CONTENTS

Legend

List of agricultural species

I.   Beet

II.   Fodder plants

III.   Oil and fibre plants

IV.   Cereals

V.   Potatoes

----

LEGEND

----

(1)OJ C 68 A, 21.3.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
# C_2005296EN.01004001.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/40

---

(2005/C 296/77)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 281, 12.11.2005

OJ C 281, 12.11.2005

Past publications

OJ C 271, 29.10.2005

OJ C 257, 15.10.2005

OJ C 243, 1.10.2005

OJ C 229, 17.9.2005

OJ C 217, 3.9.2005

OJ C 205, 20.8.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
~lzq,c;.-

s.~ 

"'-

~ 

_ S v-.. C\~ ~~ 6 --> CR> /t

--

r 

). ) 

J «.,.,.-, sz,.,.y,(j 

Je efl1'-{ 5i,hr~ .-!_\!> ~ o~ <.r 

ft ~6 M ;:;;,k 

~~C ?Dl_-5bi-2siL. '-"'····- clr\J.- ~ 'Zo'2.- ~-C{C. 2._ 

tr-IC>AJ..-(c:As:J?~ ct q -~ -ss i't 

t 1LOA ijo ps 'l 'i-S 1 r: -~ 'EP~:A.;::/cA " i' S4t- 3&4~ E P 1 lJ~tttfo~r r r C] 111t P~I 4 n1o:1 

\ 1 I 

Steyr~C\_ C l4b '(/.:;-_ 1 1:1. S'?J:.r J 

£{"A o~ 'OAP/CAmD 202-3</3 ll ~ SU

t?A Oft I ~ /r. ,_ 3o ~ · '-1
§ 416.125 ASC facility services payment rate. ( a ) The payment rate is based on a prospectively determined standard overhead amount per procedure derived from an estimate of the costs incurred by ambulatory surgical centers generally in providing services furnished in connection with the performance of that procedure.
( b ) The payment must be substantially less than would have been paid under the program if the procedure had been performed on an inpatient basis in a hospital.
( c ) For services furnished on or after January 1, 2007, and before the effective date of implementation of a revised payment system, the ASC payment rate for a surgical procedure is the lesser of the ASC payment rate established under paragraph (a) of this section or the prospective payment rate for the procedure established under § 419.32 of this chapter. The lesser payment amount is determined prior to application of any geographic adjustment.
[56 FR 8844, Mar. 1, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 68226, Nov. 24, 2006]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan President Lourenço

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan President Lourenço							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 5, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Angolan President João Lourenço in Luanda.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and President Lourenço discussed deepening our strong bilateral relationship and the importance of bolstering trade and U.S. private investment and promoting progress on economic reforms and anti-corruption initiatives.  They addressed our work together to confront the COVID-19 pandemic and address the climate crisis.  The Deputy Secretary and President also discussed opportunities for expanded cooperation on regional security and cooperation among Atlantic nations on shared maritime challenges and opportunities in the Atlantic Basin.

Tags

AngolaBureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 403.215 Loss ratio standards. ( a ) The policy must be expected to return to the policyholders, in the form of aggregate benefits provided under the policy— ( 1 ) At least 75 percent of the aggregate amount of premiums in the case of group policies; and
( 2 ) At least 60 percent of the aggregate amount of premiums in the case of individual policies.
( b ) For purposes of loss ratio requirements, policies issued as a result of solicitation of individuals through the mail or by mass media advertising are considered individual policies.
FILED

September 30, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

ROZANNE F. WRIGHT )

(FOLK-SCHMIDT), ) 

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Davidson Circuit No. 85D-3523

)

VS. ) Appeal No. 01A01-9708-CV-00413

)

JAN H. SCHMIDT, )

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

 

O R D E R

 

 Appellant has filed a petition to rehear, which, after due consideration, is 

respectfully denied.

 

 

 HIGHERS, J.

 

 CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.

 

 FARMER, J.
40841.

#### HAMES v. GEORGIA INSURANCE SERVICE, INC.

Decided September 29, 1964.

*377*John M. Hames-, Robert J-. Golden,*for plaintiff in error.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead*& *Dennis, Theodore G.. Frankel,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

An itemizéd statement of the account sued on, giving the full information as to the amount of earned premium alleged to be due upon each of the policies issued, the types of coverage and numbers of the policies was attached to the petition as an exhibit. The demurrers calling for copies of the policies were without merit and were properly overruled. *Code*§ 81-105 requires writings, to be, attached to the petition only when “they constitute the cause of action, or the relief prayed for must be based thereon.” Neither condition exists here. And *see Ittner Bros. v. Farmers State Bank,*15 Ga. App. 235 (82 SE *909); Shaheen v. Kiker,*105 Ga. App. 692 (1) (125 SE2d 541).

The only question raised by the motion for new trial is whether there was any competent, legal evidence to support the judgment. The manager of plaintiff testified that Hames came in personally to arrange for the issuance of the policies, represented that he and Bagwell had acquired the truck line, that he then promised to pay the premiums, and further that on later occasions Hames repeated his promise to pay at least three times. Upon the trial Hames testified that ,the truck line was not owned by him or Bagwell, but was owned by Harold Investment & Insurance Company, a corporation, which acquired it from Blume.

A question was raised by the evidence as to whether Hames held himself out as an owner or as a partner in the ownership of the truck line in arranging for the issuance of the policies, whether he personally obligated himself to make payment of the premiums, and whether the plaintiff, relying upon his representations of ownership and his promise of payment, issued the policies. The judge resolved the questions against Hames, as we think he was authorized to do.

Hames urges that since the petition was brought against Blume, Bagwell and himself alleging that each was an owner of the truck line but failing to allege whether their relationship' was that of partners or of something else the judgment was not authorized. *378The question as to what relationship was relied upon in bringing the action might have been raised by demurrer, but that was not done. Consequently if, as the judge concluded, the evidence authorized a judgment against him but not against the other defendants, there was no error in the entering of a judgment against him and a nonsuit as to the others.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.324 Payments to MA organizations for graduate medical education costs. ( a ) MA organizations may receive direct graduate medical education payments for the time that residents spend in non-hospital provider settings such as freestanding clinics, nursing homes, and physicians' offices in connection with approved programs.
( b ) MA organizations may receive direct graduate medical education payments if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The resident spends his or her time assigned to patient care activities.
( 2 ) The MA organization incurs “all or substantially all” of the costs for the training program in the non-hospital setting as defined in § 413.75(b) of this chapter.
( 3 ) There is a written agreement between the MA organization and the non-hospital site that indicates the MA organization will incur the costs of the resident's salary and fringe benefits and provide reasonable compensation to the non-hospital site for teaching activities.
( c ) An MA organization's allowable direct graduate medical education costs, subject to the redistribution and community support principles specified in § 413.85(c) of this chapter, consist of— ( 1 ) Residents' salaries and fringe benefits (including travel and lodging where applicable); and
( 2 ) Reasonable compensation to the non-hospital site for teaching activities related to the training of medical residents.
( d ) The direct graduate medical education payment is equal to the product of— ( 1 ) The lower of— ( i ) The MA organization's allowable costs per resident as defined in paragraph (c) of this section; or
( ii ) The national average per resident amount; and
( 2 ) Medicare's share, which is equal to the ratio of the number of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled to the total number of individuals enrolled in the MA organization.
( e ) Direct graduate medical education payments made to MA organizations under this section are made from the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.
[70 FR 4729, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 72909, Nov. 16, 2020]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-31045

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT W CLARK, JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana 

USDC No. 5:98-CR-50036-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert W. Clark, Jr., federal prisoner # 09895-035, seeks leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He seeks to appeal the district court’s denial

of his motion to disclose the grand jury transcript. Clark was convicted of

conspiracy to distribute 50 or more grams of cocaine base (crack) and

distribution of 50 or more grams of crack and was sentenced, in 1999, to 360

months of imprisonment on the conspiracy count and 240 months of

imprisonment on the distribution count. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-31045

2

Clark has not shown that the district court had jurisdiction to grant his

motion requesting the grand jury transcript in connection with a judicial

proceeding. See United States v. Carvajal, 989 F.2d 170, 170 (5th Cir. 1993).

Moreover, he has not alleged that the material is needed to avoid a possible

injustice in another judicial proceeding, and he cannot conduct a “fishing

expedition” to find something that may support further relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255. See id.

Because Clark’s appeal is wholly without merit and thus frivolous, see

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983), his IFP motion is denied

and his appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.; Carvajal, 989

F.2d at 170. We warn Clark that the filing of frivolous appeals may result in the

imposition of sanctions. These sanctions may include dismissal, monetary

sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any

court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. Clark should review any pending

appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
# C_2005331EN.01000101.xml

| 28.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 December 2005

(2005/C 331/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1852 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68295 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4753 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5573 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9555 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,915 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8258 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6616 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,705 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6014 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6261 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3832 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1890 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7555 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9752 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 199,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5219 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5693 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3860 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 644,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,480 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,035 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,522 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1852

JPY

Japanese yen

138,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68295

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4753

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5573

ISK

Iceland króna

75,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9555

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

28,915

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8258

RON

Romanian leu

3,6616

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,705

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6014

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6261

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3832

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1890

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7555

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9752

KRW

South Korean won

1 199,96

ZAR

South African rand

7,5219

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5693

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3860

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 644,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,480

PHP

Philippine peso

63,035

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1500

THB

Thai baht

48,522

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
- Summit Home
- 2022 U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit
- Implementation
- Official Travel
- Digital Transformation
- African Diaspora Council
- Remarks and Releases

HomeU.S.-Africa Leaders Summit...Digital Transformation with Africa

# 									Digital Transformation with Africa							

In December 2022, President Biden launched the Digital Transformation with Africa (DTA) initiative to expand digital access and literacy and strengthen digital enabling environments across the continent to invest over $350 million and help mobilize over $450 million in financing for Africa.  DTA is a whole-of-government initiative, and the interagency is working jointly to develop programs in answer to DTA. The Africa Digital Policy Council, co-chaired by the NSC and Commerce, has been established to coordinate interagency work on DTA.

Projects and programming supported by DTA funding will be developed through an interagency working group assigned to each of the three key areas (Digital Economy and Infrastructure, Human Capital Development and Digital Enabling Environment) and approved by the Africa Digital Policy Council.

In support of the aims of DTA, Vice President Harris in April issued a “call to action” to the private sector and the philanthropic community to make direct investments and social impact commitments to advance digital inclusion in Africa.  This work will directly support DTA’s aim to make sure that people across Africa can participate in the global digital economy.  

Back to Top
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Carol A. Rice, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of Paulson Capital Corp.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results oroperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodpresented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15-d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a.               Allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information, and

 

b.              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated: April  29, 2004 |
|------------------------|
|                   |
|                   | /s/ Carol  Rice |   |
|                   | (Carol A.  Rice) |
|                   | (Chief  Financial Officer) |

 

----
# C_2005281EN.01002902.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/29

---

Action brought on 29 August 2005 — Wineke Neirinck v Commission

(Case T-334/05)

(2005/C 281/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Wineke Neirinck (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the implied decision rejecting her claim for damages and, so far as may be necessary, the express decision rejecting her complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the implied decision rejecting her claim for damages and, so far as may be necessary, the express decision rejecting her complaint;

| — | Award damages for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss sustained by her following the breach of the Commission's promise to recruit her to the Investigatory and Disciplinary Office (IDOC) with effect from 1 May 2004 at the latest, that amount being fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 576 593,20; |
| --- | --- |

—

Award damages for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss sustained by her following the breach of the Commission's promise to recruit her to the Investigatory and Disciplinary Office (IDOC) with effect from 1 May 2004 at the latest, that amount being fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 576 593,20;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant first of all worked in the Commission as a seconded national expert from 1 May 1998 to 30 April 2001, then as a member of the temporary staff under a contract which expired on 30 April 2004.

From October 2003 the applicant took steps to obtain a new contract as a member of the temporary staff with effect from 1 May 2004. She claims that she was offered a post in the Investigatory and Disciplinary Office but that finally she was not recruited by reason of fault on the part of the Commission's staff. She alleges that DG ADMIN refused to recruit her on the basis that she had already served the maximum period of six years. According to the applicant that interpretation is erroneous as her first three years in the Commission as a seconded national expert should not have been taken into account. She submits that the administration finally admitted its error but, in the meantime, the post which had been offered to her had already disappeared as a result of restructuring.

By her action, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage she allegedly suffered. She alleges a breach of the general principles of legitimate expectations, legal certainty, good faith, the duty to state reasons, transparency, ‘patere legem quam ipse fecisti legem’, sound administration, the right to be heard, the duty to have regard to the interests of the official and the interests of the service.

---