# New Mexico State Implementation Plan Elements

Required Under Section 110(a)(2) for the

2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

Docket ID EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0821

Technical Support Document

November 2014

Table of Contents:

I. Introduction

A. Section 110(a)(1) and (2)

II. Additional Background

A. What are the National Ambient Air Quality Standards?

B. What is a SIP?

C. Additional Information

III. SIP elements required under Section 110(a)(2) for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, the State’s

submittals and EPA’s analysis

IV. Recommendations

V. References

VI. New Mexico’s 2011 Pb Emissions Inventory

I. Introduction

In this technical support document (TSD), EPA is providing addi tional documentation

concerning our evaluation of the submittal provided by the New Mexico Environment

Department (NMED) to meet the requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA

or Act) for the 2008 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or standards) for lead (Pb).

More detail on these standards, section 110(a)(1 ) and (2) of the Act, and the submittal we are

reviewing to determine if the New Mexico SIP sa tisfies the section 110(a )(2) requirements, is

provided in subsection A below. Throughout this document, “we,” “us,” and “our” means EPA.

Section II of this TSD provides additiona l background material on the NAAQS, State

Implementation Plans (SIPs), and related issues.

Section III of this TSD provides a descripti on of each element required under section

110(a)(2) of the Act, the State’s response, and ad ditional details of our an alysis of the State’s

response that are not included in the Federal Register notice for this propo sed action. Copies of

the State’s submittal are in the docket for this rulemaking.

Section IV of this TSD includes our recomm endation for action on each of the elements

reviewed herein.

Section V of the TSD contains a list of th e guidance documents cited herein. Copies of

the guidance documents referenced ar e in the docket for this rulemaking.

Section VI of the TSD contains a table su mmarizing Pb emissions from sources in New

Mexico during calendar year 2011, as reported to EPA’s National Emissions Inventory System.

# Page 2 of 23 A. Section 110(a)(1) and (2)

On October 5, 1978, we published the first NAAQS for lead (43 FR 46246). Both the

primary and secondary standards were set at 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). In 2008,

following a periodic review of the NAAQS for lead, we published a revised, more stringent

NAAQS of 0.15 μg/m3 for both the primary and secondary standards (73 FR 66964, November

13, 2008). For more information on these standard s, please see the EPA web site on the lead

NAAQS 1 

# and its history. 2



# Under sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Act, states are required to submit SIPs that

provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement (the infrastructure) of a new or

revised NAAQS within three y ears following the promulgation of the NAAQS, or within such

shorter period as EPA may prescr ibe. Section 110(a)(2) lists the specific infrastructure elements

that must be incorporated into the SIPs, incl uding for example, requirements for air pollution

control measures, which are designed to assure attainment and main tenance of the NAAQS.

Section III of this TSD provides a description of all 14 infrastructure elements that comprise

section 110(a)(2) of the Act. Th e schedule for completion of EPA’s periodic review of the Pb

NAAQS was governed by a judici al order in Missouri Coaliti on for the Environment v. EPA

(No. 4:04CV00660 ERW, Sept. 14, 2005), which requi red EPA to sign for publication a notice

of final rulemaking concerning our review of the Pb NAAQS no later than October 15, 2008.

Thus states were required to submit such infr astructure SIPs for the 2008 Lead NAAQS to EPA

no later than October 15, 2011.

In 2011 we issued “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements

Required Under Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS),” Memorandum from St ephen D. Page, Director, Air Quality Policy

Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). 3 

# This guidance document

addresses the SIP elements found in 110( a)(2) with the exception of 110(a)(2)(I). 4 

# Section

110(a)(2)(I) pertains to the nonattainment planning re quirements of part D, Title I of the Act, and

is also being addressed separately. 5



# On September 9, 2011, the Governor of New Me xico submitted a le tter certifying that

NMED has evaluated the New Mexico SIP and found that the SIP satisfies all the requirements

of section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. The September 9, 2011, submittal includes

a table with an explanation of how the current New Mexico SIP meets the requirements of each

applicable element of section 110(a)(2) for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. This TSD provides additional

details of New Mexico’s certificat ion and EPA’s evaluation that ar e not included in the official

Federal Register notice for this action.

1 

# http://www.epa.gov/ttnnaaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html

2 

# http://www.epa.gov/ttnnaaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_history.html

3 

# This guidance document is available at EPA’s 2008 Pb NAAQS implementation website at

http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/lead/p dfs/20111014infrastructure.pdf

4 

# The guidance addresses a total of 14 infrastructure elements because the 3 components of section 110(a)(2)(J) are

being counted as 3 separate elements.

5 

# Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed by the 3- year submission deadline of section

110(a)(1) because SIPs incorporating n ecessary local nonattainment area controls are not due within 3 years after

promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, but rather are due at the time the nonattainment area plan requirements

are due pursuant to section 172. Thes e requirements are: (i) Submissions re quired by section 110(a)(2)(C) to the

extent that subsection refers to a permit program as requ ired in part D Title I of the CAA and (ii) submissions

required by section 110(a)(2)(I) which pertain to the nonatt ainment planning requirements of part D Title I of the

CAA. Therefore, this action does not cover these specific SIP elements.

# Page 3 of 23 II. Additional Background

A. What are the National Ambient Air Quality Standards?

Section 109 of the Act requires EPA to es tablish NAAQS for pollutants that “may

reasonably be anticipated to endanger public heal th and welfare,” and to develop a primary and

secondary standard for each NAAQS. The primary st andard is designed to protect human health

with an adequate margin of safety, and the sec ondary standard is design ed to protect public

welfare and the environment. EPA has set NAAQS for six common air pollutants, referred to as

criteria pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, lead, ni trogen dioxide, ozone,

particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. These sta ndards present state and local governments with

the minimum air quality levels they must meet to comply with the Act. Additionally, these

standards provide information to re sidents of the United States about the quality of the air in their

communities.

B. What is a SIP?

A State Implementation Plan, or SIP, is a se t of state statutes, ai r pollution regulations,

control strategies, other means or techniques, an d technical analyses developed by the state, to

ensure that the state meets the NAAQS. The SIP is required by section 1 10 and other provisions

of the Act. These SIPs can be extensive, c ontaining state regulations or other enforceable

documents and supporting information such as em issions inventories, monitoring networks, and

modeling demonstrations. Each state must submit these regulations and cont rol strategies to EPA

for approval and incorporation into the federall y enforceable SIP. Each federally approved SIP

protects air quality primarily by addressi ng air pollution at its point of origin.

C

. 

# Additional Information

As indicated in the Federal Register notice for this action, this proposed rulemaking will

not cover four substantive issues that are not in tegral to acting on a state’s infrastructure SIP

submission: (i) existing provisions related to excess emissions during periods of start-up,

shutdown, or malfunction at sources, that may be contrary to the CAA and EPA’s policies

addressing such excess emissions (“SSM”); (ii) existing provisions related to “director's

variance” or “director's discretion” that purport to permit revisions to SIP approved emissions

limits with limited public process or without re quiring further approval by EPA, that may be

contrary to the CAA (“director's discretion”); (iii) existing pr ovisions for minor source NSR

programs that may be inconsistent with the requ irements of the CAA and EPA’s regulations that

pertain to such programs (“minor source NSR”); and, (iv) existing provisions for PSD programs

that may be inconsistent with current requireme nts of EPA’s “Final NSR Improvement Rule,” 67

FR 80186 (December 31, 2002), as amended by 72 FR 32526 (June 13, 2007) (“NSR Reform”).

Instead, EPA has indicates that it has other authority to address any such existing SIP defects in

other rulemakings, as appropriate. A detailed rationale for why thes e four substantive issues are

not part of the scope of infrastructure SI P rulemakings can be found in EPA’s July 13, 2011,

# Page 4 of 23 final rule entitled, “Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and PM 2.5 

# National Ambient Air Quality Standards” in the sect ion entitled, “What is the scope of this final

rulemaking?” (see 76 FR 41075 at 41076-41079).

III. SIP elements required under Section 110( a)(2) for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, the State’s

submittals and EPA’s analysis

The Federally approved SIP for each state is listed in 40 CFR 52. The first section in

this subpart for any state is the “Identification of plan.” The Iden tification of plan lists the EPAapproved provisions of the SIP for each state, as provided under section 110 of the Act, 42

U.S.C. 7410, and 40 CFR 51 to meet the NAAQS. The status of the New Mexico SIP is

provided in 40 CFR Part 52, Subpart GG, sections 1620 to 1640. The Identification of plan for

New Mexico is in section 1620; th is constitutes the applicable SIP for New Mexico, for purposes

of the Act.

Per the General Preamble to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (April 16, 1992 at 57

FR 13498), section 110(a)(2) sets forth elements th at a SIP must contain in order to be fully

approved. 6 

# In the following sections of this docum ent we provide additional information, not

included in the Federal Register notice for this action, which we considered in performing our

evaluation of New Mexico’s infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Where it is

useful, we include tables showi ng the date that the applicable state rules were approved by EPA

into the New Mexico SIP.

1. Enforceable emission limits and other control measures: Section 110(a)(2)(A) requires

SIPs to include enforceable emission limits and other control measures, means or techniques, as

well as schedules and timetables for compliance, as necessary or appropriate to meet the

requirements of this chapter.

The State’s response: In its submittal, the Stat e of New Mexico indicates that New Mexico’s

enforceable emission limitations and other cont rol measures are covered in the Air Quality

Control Act and those provisions of the New Me xico Administrative Code (NMAC) Title 20-

Environment Protection, Chapte r 2- Air Quality, listed in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart GG, and

source-specific provisions codified at 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart GG. The State also asserted that

the regulations authorized by Chapter 74- Envi ronmental Improvement of New Mexico’s state

statute (1978 NMSA) are duly adopted by the Environmental Improvement Board, and where

these provisions relate to section 110 requireme nts, SIP revisions have been submitted to and

approved by EPA. The State also indicates that New Mexico ha s an EPA-approved air

permitting program for both major and minor sources, which ensures that all applicable

requirements are included in the source’s permit. The NMED has determined that no reductions

in Pb emissions are required for maintenance of the 2008 Pb NAAQS.

Furthermore, the State asserts that, purs uant to NMAC 20.2.7, it does not exempt from

enforcement any excess emissions that occur dur ing periods of startup, shutdown, maintenance,

or malfunction. Emissions in excess of permit or regulatory limits are pr esumptively violations,

subject to affirmative defenses with the burden of proof on the respondent.

6 

# The discussion of section 110(a)(2), subsections (A) through (M) begins on p. 13556 of the General Preamble.

# Page 5 of 23 EPA analysis: Section 110(a)(2)(A ) requires that all measures and other elements in the SIP be

enforceable. This subsection also authorizes SI Ps to contain certain nont raditional techniques for

reducing pollution – economic incen tives, marketable permits, and auctions of emissions rights.

The EPA reads this language to require even these other means of achieving reductions to be

enforceable. 7 

# The Air Quality Control Act designate s the NMED as the State’s air pollution

control agency and the Environmental Improveme nt Act provides the NMED with enforcement

authority. We reviewed the Ne w Mexico SIP and found state rule s adequate to implement and

enforce the 2008 Pb NAAQS, and limit or reduce emissions of lead. These rules include

emission limits, control measures, as well as perm its and fees. Table 1 below provides a list of

New Mexico regulations and emissions standards that have been approved by EPA into the New

Mexico SIP and thus are federally enforceable.

Table 1: New Mexico rules relevant to meeting section 110(a)(2)(A):

Relevant Section of New Mexico’s SIP EPA Approval/ Federal Register 8



# 20.2.1 NMAC – General Provisions August 12, 2012 at 75 FR 48860

20.2.2 NMAC – Definitions September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.3 NMAC - Ambient Air Quality

Standards September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.5 NMAC - Source Surveillance September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.7 NMAC - Excess Emissions September 14, 2009 at 74 FR 46910

20.2.8 NMAC - Emissions Leaving New

Mexico September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.10 NMAC - Woodwaste Burners Se ptember 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.11 NMAC - Asphalt Process Equipment September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.12 NMAC - Cement Kilns September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.13 NMAC - Gypsum Processing Plants September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.14 NMAC - Particulate Emissions from

Coal Burning Equipment September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.15 NMAC - Pumice, Mica and Perlite

Process Equipment September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.16 NMAC - Nonferrous Smelters (New

and Existing)- Particulate Matter September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.17 NMAC - Nonferrous Smelters

(Existing)- Particulate Matter September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.18 NMAC - Oil Burning EquipmentParticulate Matter September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.19 NMAC - Potash, Salt or Sodium

Sulfate Processing Equipment- Particulate

Matter September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

7 

# See 57 FR 13498, beginning on p. 13556.

8 

# This is the EPA approval date currently found in New Mexico’s Identification of Plan at 40 CFR 52.1620(c). This

date reflects our most recent approval of revisions to the applicable New Mexico air regulations in the New Mexico

SIP.

# Page 6 of 23 Relevant Section of New Mexico’s SIP EPA Approval/ Federal Register 8



# 20.2.20 NMAC - Lime Manufacturing PlantsParticulate Matter September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.21 NMAC - Fugitive Particulate Matter

Emissions from Nonferrous Smelters September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.22 NMAC - Fugitive Particulate Matter

Emissions from Roads Within the Town of

Hurley September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.30 NMAC - Kraft Mills September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.31 NMAC - Coal Burning EquipmentSulfur Dioxide September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.32 NMAC - Coal Burning EquipmentNitrogen Dioxide September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.33 NMAC - Gas Burning EquipmentNitrogen Dioxide September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.34 NMAC - Oil Burning EquipmentNitrogen Dioxide September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.40 NMAC - Sulfuric Production UnitsSulfur Dioxide, Acid Mist and Visible

Emissions September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.41 NMAC - Nonferrous Smelters- Sulfur September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.60 NMAC – Open Burning September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.61 NMAC – Smoke and Visible

Emissions September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.72 NMAC - Construction Permits September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.73 NMAC - Notice of Intent and

Emissions Inventory Requirements August 12, 2010 at 75 FR 48860

20.2.74 NMAC - Permits- Prevention of

Significant Deterioration September 26, 1997 at 75 FR 72688

20.2.75 NMAC - Construction Permit Fees September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.79 NMAC – Permits – Nonattainment

Areas September 5, 2007 at 72 FR 50879

20.2.8 NMAC – Stack Heights September 26, 1997 at 62 FR 50514

20.2.98 NMAC - General Conformity September 9, 1998 at 63 FR 48109

20.2.99 NMAC - Transportation Conformity Various – see 40 CFR 52.1620

2. Ambient air quality monitori ng and data analysis system : Section 110(a)(2)(B) requires

SIPs to include provisions for establishment and operation of ambient air quality monitors,

collecting and analyzing ambient air quality data, and making these data available to EPA upon

request.

The State’s response: In its submittal, the NMED stated that New Mexico maintains and

operates a multi-station network to measure ambient levels within the state for comparison to the

NAAQS. All monitoring data is measured usin g EPA approved methods as either reference of

Equivalent monitors. All monitors are subjec ted to the quality assurance requirements of 40

CFR Part 58, Appendix A, and are located at sites that have met the minimum siting

# Page 7 of 23 requirements of Part 58, Appendix E. The data is submitted to EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS)

system in accordance with the schedule prescribed by 40 CFR Part 58. New Mexico SIP

satisfies this particular elem ent of section 110(a)(2)(B). The State submits an Annual Ambient

Monitoring Network Plan (AAMNP) to EPA’s Re gion 6 office for review and approval. The

most recent AAMNP was submitted on Ju ly 15, 2013, and approved on April 9, 2014.

In its certification, the Stat e indicates that it presently does not operate any sourceoriented Pb monitors due to the absence in the state of any stationary sources that emit Pb in

quantities equal to or exceed ing 0.5 tons per year. Likewise , NMED does not operate any nonsource or population-based monitors for Pb due to the absence of any Core-Based Statistical

Area (CBSA) with a population of 500,000 or gr eater. A population-based monitor is operated

by the City of Albuquerque/Berna lillo County; however, Albuquerque/Bernalillo County is

outside of NMED’s jurisdiction and has submitted its own infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Pb

NAAQS. The State asserts th at if any Pb monitoring is required in the future, all monitoring data

will be measured using EPA-approved methods as either Reference or Equivalent monitors. All

monitors will be subjected to the quality assu rance requirements of 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix A,

and located at sites that have met the minimum siting requireme nts of Part 58, Appendix E. All

data will be submitted to EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) in accordance with the schedule

prescribed by 40 CFR Part 58.

EPA analysis: As noted in the Federal Regist er notice for this proposed action, our analysis

included review of New Mexico’s recurrent 5-year ambient monitoring network assessment

submitted in June 2010 and New Mexico’s annual ambient monitoring network review submitted

in July 2013. Copies of these documents are av ailable in the docket for this rulemaking. As

indicated in these documents, NMED’s jurisdicti onal area does not contain any stationary point

sources with emissions of Pb significant enough to trigger source-oriented ambient monitoring,

or any population centers large enough to tr igger population-oriented ambient monitoring.

Additionally, we evaluated the inventory of Pb-emitting sources located in the state of

New Mexico, as reported to the 2008 and 2011 Nati onal Emissions Triennial Inventory. This list

of Pb-emissions sources, their geographic locations, and quantities of Pb emitted to the air

confirm that are no stationary point sources within NMED’s jurisdiction that emit Pb in

quantities equal to or exceed ing 1,000 pounds per year, the thre shold for triggering sourceoriented ambient Pb monitoring. A summary of the 2011 Triennial NEI Pb-emitting inventory is

included as Part VI of this document.

3. Program for enforcement of control measures : Section 110(a)(2)(C) requires states to

include a program providing for enforcement of th e measures described in subparagraph (A), and

the regulation of the modification and constructio n of any stationary sources within the areas

covered by the SIP as necessary to assure th at the NAAQS are achieved, including a permit

program as required in parts C and D.

The State's response: In its submittal, the State indicates that NMED has established regulations,

including NMAC sections 20.2.72, 20.2.74, and 20.2.79, which govern the enforcement of

control measures, including attainment plans and permitting programs that regulate construction

and modification of stationary sources. The Stat e asserts that NMED’s PSD program applies to

sources that emit greenhouse gases in accordance with EPA’s tailoring rule (see 20.2.74.AZ

NMAC).

# Page 8 of 23 EPA analysis: Refer to Table 1 above or the table of EPA-approved New Mexico Regulations

and Statutes at 40 CFR 52.1606 for a list of the stat e rules and laws that we evaluated in our

review of New Mexico’s infrastructure SIP submittal.

4. Interstate transport, and interstate and international pollution abatement : Section

110(a)(2)(D) is divided into two components, 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a )(2)(D)(ii). Section

110(a)(2)(D)(i) requires SIPs to include provisi ons prohibiting any sour ce or other type of

emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainm ent in, or interfering

with maintenance of the NAAQS, in another state, or from interfering with measures required to

prevent significant deterioration of air quality or to protect vi sibility in another state.

Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs to include provisions ensu ring compliance with

sections 115 and 126 of the Act, relating to in terstate and international pollution abatement.

The State's response:

In its submittal, the State indicates that it currently does not have any nonattainment areas

under the 2008 Pb NAAQS, and no Pb nonattainment ar eas are in close proximity to its borders.

The Pb nonattainment area closest to New Me xico is the Colin County, Texas (Frisco)

nonattainment area located in northern Texas, over 450 miles from the border New Mexico

shares with Texas.

Additionally, the State points out that no signi ficant sources of Pb emissions are located

in the state. Total point source emissions for Pb in New Mexico are less than 0.5 tons per year,

and the total emissions of Pb from area sources are less than 0.05 tons per year (based on the

2005 National Emissions Inventory).

Due to the limited amount of point and area source Pb emissions in New Mexico and the

lack of Pb nonattainment areas in the State or in proximity to its borders, the State has concluded

that Pb emissions originating in New Mexico: do not significantly c ontribute to nonattainment,

or interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS, in any other state with regards to the 2008 Pb

NAAQS; do not interfere with the measures required to implemen t PSD or for the protection of

visibility in any other state; a nd do not preclude the state from ensuring compliance with sections

115 and 126 of the CAA.

EPA analysis: All pertinent details of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

5. Adequate personnel, funding, and authority : Section 110(a)(2)(E ) requires states to

provide for adequate personnel, funding, and legal authority under state law to carry out its SIP

and related programs. It also requires complian ce with state board comp osition and conflicts of

interest contained in section 128 of the Act and requires assurances that the state retain primacy

for implementation of the SIP in cases where th e state relies upon local or regional government

agencies.

The State’s response:

With regards to section 110(a)(2)(E)(i), which pertains to adequate personnel, funding,

and authority, the State of New Mexico indicat es that New Mexico st ate statute, NMSA 1978,

# Page 9 of 23 section 74-2-5 provides the state’s Environmen tal Improvement Board authority to develop,

implement, and enforce the SIP; adopt emi ssions standards and limitations and any other

measures necessary for attainment and maintenan ce of national standards; and enforce applicable

laws, regulations, standards, and compliance schedules, and seek injunctive relief.

The State indicates that the resources necessary to carry out the SIP are provided through

general funds, permit fees, and the CAA secti on 103 and 105 grant processes. Permit fees are

collected under the auth ority of 74-2-7 NMAC.

The State asserts that no organizations out side NMED will participate in implementing

the SIP, and that New Mexico has adequate pe rsonnel to implement the SIP with respect to

requirements of the 2008 Pb NAAQS. The State doe s not anticipate the need for additional

resources to implement the SIP beyond those that ha ve been utilized for the preparation of the

plan and plan revisions submitted to EPA and other current programmatic demands.

With regards to section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), wh ich pertains to section 128 requirements for

state boards, New Mexico indicates that NMSA 1978 Section 74-1-4 provides that the

Environmental Improvement Board contain at least a majority of members who represent the

public interest and do not derive any significant portion of their in come from persons subject to,

or who appear before the Board, on issues rela ting to the CAA or New Mexico’s Air Quality

Control Act. Board members are required to recuse themselves from rulemakings in which their

impartiality may reasonably be questioned. (See 20.1.1.111 NMAC).

With regards to section 110( a)(2)(E)(iii), which pertains to assurances concerning

reliance on local government agencies, the Stat e indicates that the City of Albuquerque/

Bernalillo County is authorized to carry out all portions of New Mexi co’s SIP within the

jurisdictional boundaries of Bernalillo County. However, NMED and the State Environmental

Improvement Board retain oversight authority in th e event the local authority fails to act. (See

Section 74-2-4 NMSA).

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

6. Stationary source emissions monitoring and reporting : Section 110(a)(2 )(F) requires, as

may be prescribed by the Administrator, (i) th e installation, maintenance and replacement of

equipment, and the implementation of other necessary steps, by owners or ope rators of stationary

sources to monitor emissions from such source s, (ii) periodic reports on the nature and amounts

of emissions and emissions-related data from such sources, and (iii) correlation of such reports

by the State agency with any emission limitations or standards established pursuant to this Act,

which reports shall be available at reasonable times for public inspection.

The State's response: In its submittal for the 2008 Pb NAAQS, the State of New Mexico

indicates that its regulato ry requirements have been codified in 20.2.72 NMAC ( Construction

Permits ), 20.2.70 NMAC ( Operating Permits ), and 20.2.79 NMAC ( Permits-Nonattainment

Areas ). The State indicates that requirements in 20.2.7.73 NMAC ( Notice of Intent and Emission

Inventory Requirements ) provide for the reporting of em issions inventories in a format

established by the NMED on a sche dule set forth in the regulation. New Mexico also asserts that

enforceable emission limitations and other contro l measures are addressed in the State’s Air

Quality Control Act and those provisions of 20.2 NMAC. The State indi cates that 20.2.5 NMAC

# Page 10 of 23 ( Source Surveillance ) establishes the general requirements for maintaining and reporting records

on emissions, including recordkeeping, data subm issions, and public access to emission data.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

7. Emergency power : Section 110(a)(2)(G) requires states to provide for authority to address

activities causing imminent and substantial enda ngerment to public healt h, including adequate

contingency plans to implement the emerge ncy episode provisions in their SIPs.

The State's response: In its submittal for the 2008 Pb NAAQS, the State of New Mexico

emphasizes that there are currently no significant s ources of Pb emissions w ithin the state or in

close enough proximity to the state border s to impact communities in New Mexico.

Nevertheless, the State indicates that existing stat utes provide adequate au thority to constrain any

sources of Pb emissions, as necessary, should an emergency situation arise. Under NMSA

Section 74-2-10, the Secretary of NMED is empo wered to bring suit to immediately restrain a

facility causing emissions that present an immi nent and substantial endangerment to public

health, welfare, or the environm ent. Alternatively, the NMED Secretary is authorized to issue

orders necessary to protect the public health or we lfare, or the environment, and then bring suit

against contributing sources within 24 hours. If the Secretary brings an action within that time,

the order is effective for another 48 hours or for such longer period as may be authorized by the

court pending litigation.

New Mexico adopted an Air Pollution Ep isode Contingency Plan (56 FR 38074, August

12, 1991), 9 

# that addresses air pollution episodes and the occurrence of an emergency due to the

effects of the pollutants on the health of persons . This Contingency Plan cites the State’s legal

authority provided to the Secret ary of the NMED under NMSA Sec tion 74-2-10 in the event that

an emergency episode is experienced. The State asserts that the Contingency Plan meets the

requirements of 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart H, wh ich concerns the prev ention of Air Pollution

Emergency Episodes.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

8. Future SIP revisions : Section 110(a)(2 )(H) requires states to have the authority to revise

their SIPs in response to changes in the NAAQS, availability of improved methods for attaining

NAAQS, or in response to an EPA finding th at the SIP is substantially inadequate.

The State’s response:

The State responded that the New Mexico SIP is a compilation of regulations, plans, and

submittals that act to improve and maintain air quality in accordance with national standards.

9 

# The State erred in providing the date and Federal Register citation for EPA’s approval of New Mexico’s Air

Pollution Episode Contingency Plan (56 FR 38074). The date and Federal Register citation the State provided in

their submittal is for EPA’s approval of Albuquerque-Ber nalillo County’s Air Pollution Episode Contingency Plan,

submitted on April 14, 1989, and applies only within the bo undaries of Bernalillo County (including the City of

Albuquerque). EPA approved New Mexico’s Air Pollution Episode Contingency Plan on August 21, 1990 (the

correct citation is 55 FR 34013).

# Page 11 of 23 The authority to develop or revise the SIP is based on the authority to adopt new regulations,

revise existing regulations, and conduct business in a manner to meet the NAAQS. New Mexico

state statute § 74-7-5 gives the boa rd authority to perform these functions. § 74-7-5 also provides

the board the authority to adopt regulations to abate, contro l, and prohibit air pollution

throughout New Mexico in accordance with the provisions of State Rules Act [Chapter 14,

Article 4, NMSA 1978]. Nothing in New Mexico's st atutory or regulatory au thority prohibits the

State from revising the SIP in the event of a revision to the NAAQS.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

9. Nonattainment area plans or plan revisions under Part D of the CAA : Section

110(a)(2)(I) contains provisions re lated to the submission of nona ttainment area plans or plan

revisions as specified in Part D of the CAA.

The State's response: The State indicates that compliance under the Pb NAAQS will be

evaluated with submitted SIP revisions for any future nonattainment areas. These SIP revisions

will comply with the applicable requirements of Part D. The currently approved nonattainment

area SIP provisions listed in 40 CFR Part 52, Subpart GG satisfy the Part D requirements.

EPA analysis: As noted previ ously, EPA does not expect infras tructure SIP submissions to

address subsection 110(a)(2)(I). Nonattainment ar ea plans required under Pa rt D are required to

be submitted on a different schedule from the Section 110 infrastructure elements and will be

reviewed and acted upon th rough a separate process.

10. Consultation, public notice, and PSD and visibility protection : Section 110(a)(2)(J) is

divided into three components: consultation w ith government officials, public notification

requirements, and provisions for PSD and visibility protection. With regards to consultation with

government officials, this section requires states to provide a process fo r consultation with local

governments and Federal Land Managers (F LMs) carrying out NAAQS implementation

requirements pursuant to secti on 121 relating to consultation. Section 110(a)(2)(J) further

requires states to notify the pub lic if NAAQS are exceeded in an area and to enhance public

awareness of measures that can be taken to prevent exceedances. Section 110(a)(2)(J) also

requires States to meet applicable requirements of Part C related to Prevention of Significant

Deterioration and visibility protection.

The State's response: The Stat e indicates that all SIP revi sions undergo public notice and

hearing, which provides for opportunities to co mment by the public, including local political

subdivisions. Additional public notification concerning compliance with the NAAQS is

accomplished by real-time publishing of air quality data from NMED’s monitoring network to

the NMED website. This air quality monitoring data is also submitted to EPA’s Air Quality

System (AQS) in a timely manner, where it is also made public. The NMED website provides

information on the air quality index (AQI) and on ways in which the public can participate in

regulatory and planning effo rts related to air quality.

With regards to the consultation requirements of the PSD permitting program, New

Mexico has adopted 20.2.74 NMAC, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, following the

# Page 12 of 23 requirements outlined in 40 CFR 52 under section 161 of the CAA for prevention of significant

deterioration. These PSD permitting provisions we re approved by EPA as part of the SIP.

With regards to visibility protection, 20.2.74 NMAC includes procedures for protection

of visibility in Class I areas. In addition, New Mexico submitted its Regional Haze SIP to EPA in

June 2011. This SIP revision is intended to provide further visibility protection and

improvements to federal Class I areas.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

11. Air quality modeling a nd submission of data : Section 110(a)(2)(K ) requires that SIPs

provide for performing air quality modeling to predict effects on air quality resulting from

emissions of any NAAQS pollutant, and subm ission of such data to EPA upon request.

The State’s response: The St ate indicates that New Mexico has developed Air Dispersion

Modeling Guidelines that follow EPA guidelines for air dispersion modeling; these guidelines

also include some internal policy language. Th e Air Quality Bureau within NMED contains a

modeling section that is staffe d with four qualified modelers , two of which have earned

accredited doctorate of philosophy degrees. NMED submits to EPA data related to modeling

upon request.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

12. Permitting fees : Section 110(a)(2)(L) requ ires SIPs to require each major stationary source

to pay permitting fees to cover the cost of re viewing, approving, implementing and enforcing a

permit.

The State's response: The State indicate s that the fee requirements of 20.2.71 NMAC ( Operating

Permit Emission Fees ) and 20.2.75 NMAC ( Construction Permit Fees ) were approved by EPA

as meeting the CAA requirements and were inco rporated into New Mexico’s SIP (11/25/97, 62

FR 50514). The State also indicates that Ne w Mexico’s Title V operating permit program

codified in 20.2.70 NMAC was approve d by EPA in 1997 (11/25/97, 62 FR 50514). 10



# EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

13. Consultation/participation by affected local entities : Section 110(a)(2)(M) requires states

to provide for consultation and participation in SIP development by local political subdivisions

affected by the SIP.

10 

# The date and Federal Register citation provided by New Mexico is for the rulemaking in which we made a CFR

codification error in 40 CFR 52.1620(c) by in correctly including entries in the table titled “EPA Approved New

Mexico Regulations” for part 70 ( Operating Permits ) and part 71 ( Operating Permit Emission Fees ) of 20.2 NMAC.

Part 70 and part 71 of 20.2 NMAC constitute New Mexico’s Title V permitting program and the associated

permitting fees, respectively. The approval of NMED’s Title V operating permit program is codified at 40 CFR Part

70, Appendix A.

# Page 13 of 23 The State’s response: In its submittal, the State responds to this infrastructure SIP requirement

by stating that New Mexico Statute § 74-2-5.2 "Sta te air pollution control agency; specific duties

and powers of the department," requires advising; consulting; c ontracting with and cooperating

with local authorities, other stat es, the federal government and ot her interested persons or groups

in regard to matters of common interest in the field of air quality cont rol; and initiation of

cooperative action between a local authority and the department, be tween one local authority and

another or among any combination of local author ities and the department for control of air

pollution in areas having related air pollution problems that overl ap the boundaries of political

subdivisions; and entering into agreements and co mpacts with adjoining states and Indian tribes,

where appropriate. The State's public particip ation requirements and procedures fulfill the

requirements for consultation with local pol itical subdivisions a ffected by the SIP.

EPA analysis: All pertinent detail s of our analysis for this infrastructure element are included in

the Federal Register notice.

IV. EPA’s Recommendation

We reviewed New Mexico’s submittal, SI P, and recent air quality data for lead for

compliance with the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Act for the 2008 Pb

NAAQS. Based on this evaluation, we recommen d that EPA propose to approve the submittal

provided by the State of New Mexico to dem onstrate that the New Mexico SIP meets the

applicable requirements of sec tions 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Act with resp ect to the 2008 lead

standard. The submittal adequately addresses the infrastructure elements specified in the CAA

section 110(a)(2) that are necessary to implemen t, maintain, and enforce the 2008 Lead NAAQS.

We recommend approval of the New Mexico infrastructure SIP for the 2008 Lead NAAQS

for the following elements :

Emission limits and other control measures: Section 110(a)(2)(A)

Ambient air quality monitoring/data system: Section 110(a)(2)(B)

Program for enforcement of control measures: Section 110(a)(2)(C)

Interstate transport: Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)

Adequate resources: Section 110(a)(2)(E)

Stationary source monitoring system: Section 110(a)(2)(F)

Emergency power: Section 110(a)(2)(G)

Future SIP revisions: Section 110(a)(2)(H)

Consultation with government offi cials: Section 110(a)(2)(J)

Public notification: Section 110(a)(2)(J)

PSD and visibility protectio n: Section 110(a)(2)(J)

Air quality and modeling/data : Section 110(a)(2)(K)

Permitting fees: Section 110(a)(2)(L)

Consultation/particip ation by affected local enti ties: Secti on 110(a)(2)(M)

# Page 14 of 23 V. References

1. Guidance on Infrastructure State Implem entation Plan (SIP) Elements Required Under

Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS), Memorandum from Stephe n D. Page, Director, Air Qu ality Policy Division, OAQPS,

to Regional Air Division Directors.

http://www.epa.gov/oar/lead/pdf s/20111014infrastructure.pdfVI. New Mexico’s 2011 Pb Emissions InventorySiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeDoubleEagleII0.183659365811BernalilloAirportSantaFeMuni0.163209365211SantaFeAirportAlbuquerqueIntlSunport0.122329365911BernalilloAirportLasCrucesInternational0.112239390211DonaAnaAirportDonaAnaCounty0.101949390511DonaAnaAirportAlamogordo‐WhiteSands0.091809377411OteroAirportMORIARTY0.0816311014111TorranceAirportFourCornersRegional0.081609365511SanJuanAirportTucumcariMuni0.071369377211QuayAirportClovisMuni0.071369363611CurryAirportMIDVALLEYAIRPARK0.0611112343211ValenciaAirportDemingMuni0.051049379011LunaAirportAlexanderMuni0.05959363211ValenciaAirportPortalesMunicipal0.05959372011RooseveltAirportRoswellIndustrialAir0.04849364111ChavesAirportTruthOrConsequencesMuni0.04809365111SierraAirportTaosRgnl0.04729364711TaosAirportLosAlamos0.04729379111LosAlamosAirportPNM‐SanJuanGeneratingStation0.03687991911SanJuanElectricityGenerationviaCombustionU.S.DHSFederalLawEnforcementTrainingCenterArtesia0.03669386811EddyLasVegasMuni0.03619365311SanMiguelAirportArtesiaMuni0.03579386611EddyAirportAZTECMUNI0.035712469511SanJuanAirportPage16of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeLeaCountyRgnl0.02499379511LeaAirportPrewittEscalanteGeneratingStation0.02445597111McKinleyElectricityGenerationviaCombustionGrants‐MilanMuni0.02419364011CibolaAirportChinoMine0.02387991811GrantMines/QuarriesRatonMunicipal/CrewsF0.02389363711ColfaxAirportSierraBlancaRegional0.02349379311LincolnAirportSocorroMuni0.01269364911SocorroAirportLeaCounty/Jal/0.01239379611LeaAirportLordsburgMuni0.01239384811HidalgoAirportSANDIAAIRPARKESTATESEAST0.012311483411SantaFeAirportCavernCityAirTrml0.01219386511EddyAirportClaytonMuniArpk0.01189363311UnionAirportAngelFire0.01189363911ColfaxAirportCarrizozoMuni0.01179379411LincolnAirportU.S.DOENationalTrainingCenterCta0.01179366111BernalilloMagdalena0.01139365011SocorroAirportHatchMuni0.01139390311DonaAnaAirportLeaCounty‐ZipFranklin0.01129379811LeaAirportSantaRosaRoute660.01119384911GuadalupeAirportGallupMunicipal0.01119378811McKinleyAirportMaterionCorporation0.01109368511BernalilloSecondaryNon‐ferrousMetalSmelting/RefiningPlant(notPb,Al,orCu)GrantCounty0.0099385011GrantAirportGCCRIOGRANDE0.0097906011BernalilloPortlandCementManufacturingCTSElectronicComponentsInc0.0089366311BernalilloSPS‐CunninghamStationPowerPlant0.0085229511LeaElectricityGenerationviaCombustionWHISKEYCREEK0.00711280511GrantAirportPage17of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeElPasoElectric‐RioGrandeGeneratingStation0.0067581811DonaAnaElectricityGenerationviaCombustionKirtlandAirForceBase0.0067989711BernalilloMilitaryBaseConchasStatePark0.0069365411SanMiguelAirportSanJuanPueblo0.0069375311RioArribaAirportU.S.DOELosAlamosNationalLaboratory0.0059379211LosAlamosMilitaryBaseINDUSTRIALAIRPARK0.00512118111LeaAirportNavajoRefining‐ArtesiaRefinery0.0047399911EddyPetroleumRefineryJicarillaApacheNation0.0049377111RioArribaAirportMaddoxStation0.0035228411LeaElectricityGenerationviaCombustionCIELODORADOESTATES0.00312174111DonaAnaAirportShiprockAirstrip0.0039368411SanJuanAirportCASASADOBESAIRPARK0.00311401211GrantAirportTranscoreAmtechTechnologyCenter0.0029366211BernalilloMANZANO‐MOUNTAINAIRRANCH0.00212118511ValenciaAirportFIRSTAEROSQUADRONAIRPARK0.00211398211LunaAirportBENEDICTAIRPARK0.00211398711ChavesAirportSHOESTRINGRANCH0.00212117811DonaAnaAirportWHITEWATERMESARANCH0.00212116611CatronAirportNEWMEXICOSOARINGRANCH0.00211400711SantaFeAirportLINDRITHAIRPARK0.00211321811RioArribaAirportQuestaMuniNr20.0029364811TaosAirportCOLUMBUSMUNI0.00210984511LunaAirportHACIENDASURLUNA0.00212117711LunaAirportCROWNPOINT0.00211014211McKinleyAirportBIGSKY0.00212117211SantaFeAirportAEROTECHINC0.00212116111CurryAirportPage18of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeGallupRefinery0.0018105511McKinleyPetroleumRefinerySKEENRANCH0.00111266611LincolnAirportRAYRANCH0.00112355411HardingAirportSKYWAGONFARM0.00112118411ValenciaAirportMYSTICBLUFFS0.00112116711CibolaAirportFLYINGHRANCH0.00111227011ChavesAirportJENKINS0.00112118311ChavesAirportBECKETTFARM0.00111399111OteroAirportOTEROMILL0.00111798311OteroAirportTIMBERON0.00111983811OteroAirportMESAVERDERANCHSTRIP0.00116132111OteroAirport2X4RANCH0.00111400111EddyAirportReserve0.0019365611CatronAirportBELLRANCHWAGGONER0.00111399311SanMiguelAirportCUBERO0.00112117511CibolaAirportHIGHLONESOME0.00112118611CibolaAirportLUNALANDING0.00111399011LunaAirportCOLUMBUSSTOCKYARDS0.00111556711LunaAirportSOLORANCH0.00112355211LunaAirportBURRISRANCHNR10.00112013011SocorroAirportRANCHOMAGDALENA0.00112355011SocorroAirportBIPLANERANCH0.00111397811BernalilloAirportJ&MFARMS0.00111400311TorranceAirportCHLORIDE0.00111400411SierraAirportCURTISANDCURTIS0.00111222711QuayAirportCAMCORANCH0.00111400511QuayAirportS&SRANCH0.00111284711MoraAirportPage19of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeHAPPYMOUNTAIN0.00111399811CatronAirportPOCOLOCO0.00111400911CatronAirportQUEMADO0.00112117911CatronAirportDOUBLEVRANCH0.00112116011DeBacaAirportCLAVELRANCH0.00111398511HardingAirportTEQUESQUITERANCH0.00112355311HardingAirportLovingtonRefinery0.0017980011LeaPetroleumRefineryTatum0.0019379711LeaAirportTarga‐EuniceGasProcessingPlant0.0018092311LeaMOUNTAINAIRMUNI0.00111354911TorranceAirportNavajoStatePark0.0019371811SanJuanAirportSEVENRIVERS0.00111218811EddyAirportPublicServiceCompanyofNewMexico–ReevesGeneratingStation0.0017532111BernalilloElectricityGenerationviaCombustionFortSumnerMuni0.0019363411DeBacaAirportMilagroCogenerationandGasPlant0.0017993111SanJuanLinamRanchGasPlant0.0018241211LeaIntrepidPotash‐EastPlant0.0017612211EddyBELEN0.00114445111ValenciaRailYardSanJuanRiverGasPlant0.0018091911SanJuanGasPlantLosAlamosNationalLaboratory0.0007994911LosAlamosMilitaryBaseCLOVISSWITCHES0.00014444911CurryRailYardGALLUP0.00014445011McKinleyRailYardEmpireAboGasPlant0.0007584511EddyGasPlantWingateFractionatingPlant0.00013646011McKinleyOilorGasProcessingVAUGHNMUNI0.00011383611GuadalupeAirportJalNo3GasPlant0.0005226911LeaGasPlantPage20of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypePLAYASMEDICALBLDG0.00011269811HidalgoAirportSTVINCENTHOSPITAL0.00011398011SantaFeAirportHOME0.00011398111ValenciaAirportUNIVERSITYOFNMHOSPITAL0.00011398311BernalilloAirportCHOWNING0.00011398411BernalilloAirportSIERRAVISTAHOSPITAL0.00011398811SierraAirportKEELIN0.00011399411OteroAirportSOCORROGENERALHOSPITAL0.00011399511SocorroAirportSOUTHWELLH.Q.0.00011399911GrantAirportSHERATONINN0.00011400611SandovalAirportTAOSCOUNTYHOSPITAL0.00011400811TaosAirportGILARGNL0.00011402011GrantAirportPAYJAYNR10.00012116211EddyAirportPAYJAYNR20.00012116311EddyAirportSTJOSEPHWESTMESAHOSPITAL0.00012116411BernalilloAirportGOVERNOR'SRESIDENCE0.00012116811SantaFeAirportEMERGENCYOPERATIONSCENTER0.00012116911SierraAirportHOFFMANNHELICOPTERS0.00012117011LeaAirportSJRMC0.00012117111SanJuanAirportMEMORIALMEDICALCENTER0.00012117611DonaAnaAirportALBUQUERQUERGNLMEDICALCENTER0.00012354911BernalilloAirportRUIDOSO0.00012355511LincolnAirportCRUSADER0.00016083311UnionAirportMINER'SCOLFAXMEDICALCENTER0.00016132211ColfaxAirportNORLEACOUNTYGENERALHOSPITAL0.00016132311LeaAirportROSWELLRGNLHOSPITAL0.00016132411ChavesAirportNEGRITOAIRSTRIP0.00010984611CatronAirportUNMMAINCAMPUS0.0007904311BernalilloInstitutional(school,hospital,prison,etc.)Page21of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeBlackRock0.0009377511McKinleyAirportGlenwood‐CatronCounty0.0009365711CatronAirportBEAVERHEADAIRSTRIP0.00011001511CatronAirportJEWETTMESA0.00011002111CatronAirportALBUQUERQUE0.00014485311BernalilloRailYardSpringerMuni0.0009363811ColfaxAirportCONCHASLAKE0.00012342411SanMiguelAirportME‐OWN0.00011049511CatronAirportAKINANDAKIN0.00011401511QuayAirportBloomfieldProductsTerminal0.0008091811SanJuanPetroleumRefineryGBARFRANCH0.00011401911LincolnAirportCannonAirForceBase0.0007399111CurryMilitaryBaseLunaEnergyFacility0.0007404611LunaElectricityGenerationviaCombustionIndianBasinGasPlant0.0007905211EddyOilorGasProcessingMosaicPotashCarlsbadInc0.0007611611EddyCannonAFBAirport0.0009363511CurryAirportHollomanAFBAirport0.0009377311OteroAirportMONTEPRIETORANCH0.00011189511SocorroAirportLOCKMILLER&SONS0.00011191911CurryAirportDIAMONDARANCH0.00011266011LincolnAirportNALDARANCH0.00011268911CatronAirportSTALLIONAAF0.00011281311SocorroAirportESTANCIAMUNI0.00011322411TorranceAirportCHAMALAND&CATTLECO.0.00011398611RioArribaAirportEASTSIDE0.00011398911RioArribaAirportROSEBUD0.00011399211HardingAirportBOJAXRANCH0.00011400011ChavesAirportPage22of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeESENADA0.00011400211RioArribaAirportRAELRANCHHORSEPASTURE0.00011401111CatronAirportRODEO0.00011401311HidalgoAirportPARKSPRINGS0.00011401711SanMiguelAirportAMIGOSDELCIELO0.00011402111HidalgoAirportTIERRADEDIOS0.00011402211SanMiguelAirportBLOCKRANCH0.00011845111LincolnAirportADOBERANCHPRIVATE0.00012115911CatronAirportSANMIGUELRANCH0.00012116511SanMiguelAirportGRAYRANCH0.00012117311HidalgoAirportTHREERIVERSRANCH0.00012117411OteroAirportPLAYASAIRSTRIP0.00012118211HidalgoAirportCONDRONAAF0.00012260411DonaAnaAirportLINCOLNSTATION0.00012355611LincolnAirportSANOSTEE0.00012355711SanJuanAirportBELLRANCHHEADQUARTERS0.00012355811SanMiguelAirportHIGHDESERTRANCH0.00016082911LincolnAirportSPACEPORTAMERICA0.00016086811SierraAirportCHAMPIONRANCH0.00016131811EddyAirportDREAMCATCHERRANCH0.00016131911CatronAirportELKVALLEY0.00016132011CatronAirportREDRIVER0.00016089011TaosAirportCIMARRON0.00016087811ColfaxAirportMOSQUEROEMERGENCYSERVICES0.00016088911HardingAirportCATRONCOUNTY0.00016087911CatronAirportPage23of23SiteName2011PbEmissions(tons)2011PbEmissions(lbs)EISIdentifierCountyFacilityTypeTyroneMine0.0005210311GrantPyramidGeneratingStation0.0005213011HidalgoElectricityGenerationviaCombustionFrontierFieldServices‐MaljamarGasPlant0.0005226611LeaMonumentCompressorStation0.0005227111LeaCompressorstationCaprockCompressorStation0.0005227211LeaCompressorstationDCPMidstream‐EuniceGasPlant0.0005228911LeaLuskBoosterStation0.0005229311LeaCompressorstationWashingtonRanchStorageFacility0.0005869311EddyCompressorstationChacoGasPlant0.0007198011SanJuanGasPlantFloridaCompressorStation0.0007404111LunaCompressorstationBluewaterCompressorStation0.0007404911McKinleyCompressorstationFXI‐SantaTeresaPlant0.0007582411DonaAnaWhiteSandsMissileRange0.0007582911DonaAnaMilitaryBaseNewMexicoStateUniversityCampus0.0007583011DonaAnaInstitutional(school,hospital,prison,etc.)PenascoCompressorStation0.0007906411EddyCompressorstationEastVacuumLiquidRecoveryandCO2Plant0.0007994411LeaConocoPhilips‐MCATankBatteryNo20.0008044411LeaOilorGasProcessingDentonGasPlant0.0008091311LeaGasPlantRedBluffNo3CompressorStation0.0008173411ChavesCompressorstationMonumentGasPlant0.0008241311LeaSaundersGasPlant0.0008241411LeaGasPlantDFA‐Portales0.0008242211RooseveltBluffviewPowerPlant0.00013646111SanJuanElectricityGenerationviaCombustionTotalState‐Wide2011PbEmissionsfromPointSourcesandAirports:1.913,822