alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 419.71 Payment reduction for certain X-ray imaging services. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section, the term “computed radiography technology” means cassette-based imaging which utilizes an imaging plate to create the image involved.
( b ) *Payment reduction for film X-ray imaging services.* For an imaging service that is an X-ray taken using film and that is furnished during 2017 or a subsequent year, the payment amount for such service (including the X-ray component of a packaged service) is reduced by 20 percent.
( c ) *Payment reduction for computed radiography imaging services.* The payment amount for an imaging service that is an X-ray taken using computed radiography technology (including the X-ray component of a packaged service) is reduced by— ( 1 ) 7 percent, for such services furnished in CY 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, or 2022.
( 2 ) 10 percent, for such services furnished in CY 2023 or a subsequent calendar year.
( d ) *Application without regard to budget neutrality.* The reductions taken under this section are not considered adjustments under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act and are not implemented in a budget neutral manner.
[82 FR 52637, Nov. 13, 2017; 82 FR 59497, Dec. 14, 2017]
122 STAT. 3738 PUBLIC LAW 110–341—OCT. 3, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 35: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–850 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

July 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 17, 18, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–341 

110th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

To amend Public Law 108–331 to provide for the construction and related activities 

in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System 

(VERITAS) project in Arizona. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LOCATION OF VERITAS PROJECT. 

Public Law 108–331 (118 Stat. 1281) is amended— 

(1) in the long title, by striking ‘‘on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 

Arizona’’ and inserting ‘‘in Arizona’’; and 

(2) in section 1, by striking ‘‘on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 

Arizona’’ and inserting ‘‘at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory Base Camp on Mount Hopkins, Arizona, or other similar 

location’’. 

Approved October 3, 2008. 

20 USC 50 note. 

Oct. 3, 2008 

[S.J. Res. 35] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
#### Weisheimer et al. *v.*The Board of Agriculture of Ohio et al.

*Constitutional law*— *Inspection of feed stuffs*— *Licensing of dealers*— *Sections 1141 to X149-1, General Code (106 O. L., 136-139).*

(No. 16420

Decided June 8, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

*Messrs. Williams & Nash,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John G. Price,*attorney general, and *Mr. Ray Martin,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Saviers*v. *Smith, Secretary of State, ante,*132, and *Castle*v. *Mason,*91 Ohio St., 296.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
#### § 137.288 What is the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)?

The NHPA requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings, such as construction projects, on properties covered by the NHPA, such as historic properties, properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or properties that an Indian Tribe regards as having religious and/or cultural importance. Section 106 of the NHPA [16 U.S.C. 470f] requires Federal agencies to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, acting through the SHPO or the THPO, a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.
Exhibit 23.1


                       Consent of Independent Accountant


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated
February 4, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Datakey, Inc. (the
"Company") included in this Form 10-KSB into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 No, 33-14144, No. 33-47068, No. 33-67280,
No. 333-11405, No. 33-80894, No. 333-43937 and No. 333-83999 and on Form S-3
No. 333-56711, No. 333-84007, No. 333-91779, No. 333-90969 and No. 94087.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 23, 2000
From: Emily H. Nunez 

Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:54:27 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 

To: Manufactured Housing 

Subject: EERE-2009-BT-BC-0021

Dear Ms. Edwards,

  

I reviewed the attached Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 34 dated February 22, 2010, and would like to

learn more about the status of the proposed rules on the Energy Efficiency Standards for Manufactured

Housing.  Any information you can provide would be greatly appreciated!

  

Thank you,

  

Emily H. Nunez

Management Analyst

Nevada State Office of Energy

T 775.687.1850 ext. 7324

F 775.687.1869

ehnunez@energy.nv.gov

http://energy.nv.gov  

This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended

only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this

communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the

intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e‐mail and delete all copies of the original

message.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 20, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 0003 7

- CV

Luther W. Cobb, Sr, Appellant

v.

Joseph Campbell, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE L LY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

Therefore, the C ourt dism isses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudicat ion of costs is made.
# C_2006114EN.01000101.xml

| 16.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 May 2006

(2006/C 114/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2826 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4543 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3865 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5509 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,41 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5751 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,420 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9348 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5436 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8857 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6791 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4305 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9441 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0618 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0285 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 210,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2308 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2585 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 710,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,631 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,003 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,036 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2826

JPY

Japanese yen

141,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4543

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68120

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3865

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5509

ISK

Iceland króna

91,41

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5751

CZK

Czech koruna

28,420

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9348

RON

Romanian leu

3,5436

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,750

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8857

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6791

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4305

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9441

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0618

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0285

KRW

South Korean won

1 210,13

ZAR

South African rand

8,2308

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2585

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 710,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,631

PHP

Philippine peso

67,003

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6380

THB

Thai baht

49,036

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Iranian Proliferators of Shipping Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology to Russia for Use in Ukraine

# 									Designating Iranian Proliferators of Shipping Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology to Russia for Use in Ukraine							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 8, 2022

The United States is designating a person involved in the shipment of Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to Russia for its war against Ukraine, as well as four other persons involved in Iranian UAV activities, including the production of Shahed-series UAVs and related components for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The Russian military is suffering from major supply shortages in Ukraine, in part because of sanctions and export controls, forcing Russia to turn to unreliable countries like Iran for supplies and equipment.  The United States will hold those who support Russia’s unprovoked war against Ukraine to account, including by continuing to sanction Iranian or other entities that provide lethal aid to Russia.

We will also use all available tools, including sanctions, to prevent, deter, and dismantle the procurement networks that supply UAV-related material and technology to Iran, as well as the Iranian entities that engage in such proliferation.  We also warn any third country that seeks to purchase these drones from Iran that doing so implicates multiple U.S. sanction authorities.

Today’s action is being taken pursuant to weapons of mass destruction proliferation-related Executive Order (E.O.) 13382 as well as Russia-related E.O. 14024.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsIranOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaThe Secretary of StateUkraine

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY


        Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints William C.
Niegsch, Jr., Mark F. Emerson and Todd B. Barnum as his or her attorneys or any
of them individually as his or her attorney, to sign, in his or her name and
behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year
ended October 29, 1995, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any
and all amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Form 10-K, and
the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and
each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the
Form 10-K and any amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact
full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any
such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 12th day of
December, 1995.


Signature                          Title
---------                          -----

/s/ Todd B. Barnum                 Chairman, President, Chief Executive
--------------------------         Officer and Director
Todd B. Barnum     


/s/ Mark F. Emerson                Chief Operating Officer and Director
--------------------------         
Mark F. Emerson


/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.        Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
--------------------------         Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director
William C. Niegsch, Jr.   


/s/ Karen A. Brennan               Vice President of Marketing and
--------------------------         Strategic Development and Director
Karen A. Brennan                   


/s/ William E. Arthur              Director
--------------------------         
William E. Arthur


<PAGE>   2


Signature                           Title
---------                           -----


/s/ Robert A. Rothman               Director
--------------------------         
Robert A. Rothman


/s/ Roger D. Blackwell              Director
--------------------------         
Roger D. Blackwell


/s/ Donald W. Kelley                Director
--------------------------         
Donald W. Kelley


/s/ Michael D. Murphy               Director
--------------------------         
Michael D. Murphy
|                                                                                                                                                   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                   | By:    | /s/ Samuel      Zell                                                                                                                            |   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |   | Name:       Samuel Zell                                                                                                                         |   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |   | Title:         Chairman and             Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                           |   |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |   |  August      13, 2008                                                                                                                           |   |
No. 00-150.

#### California et al. *v.*Washington.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### HOUDAILLE-DUVAL-WRIGHT CO., a Division of Houdaille Industries, Inc., Appellant, v. EDELPHI BUILDERS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1285.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 24, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2006108EN.01001702.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/17

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Herbillon v Commission

(Case T-411/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Appointment - Revision of the classification in grade - Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 108/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Georges Herbillon (Arlon, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and E. De Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

:

Re:

Application for, firstly, annulment of the Commission's decision of 20 December 2002, setting the applicant's final classification at Grade A7, step 3, and, secondly, annulment of the Commission's decision of 29 July 2003, rejecting the applicant's complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 7.2.2004.

1

---
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1538

DUNCAN BA SS

,

Petitioner

- Appellant

,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

,

Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court . ( Tax Ct. No. 024071

- 16 )

Submitted : September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Duncan Bass, Appellant Pro Se. Ellen Page DelSole, Douglas Campbell Rennie, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI A M:

Duncan Bass app eals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s

determination of a deficiency with respect to his 20 13 income tax . We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

tax court. Bas s v. Comm’r of Internal Rev. , Tax Ct. No. 024071

- 16 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 23,

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional p rocess.

AFFIRM ED
#### Jim SMITH, Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, State of Florida, and Janet Reno, State Attorney of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Appellants, v. GREEN VALLEY FOODS, INC., Safe Holding Corporation and P. S. G. Corporation, all Florida Corporations, Appellees.

No. 78-742.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 9, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1979.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Leonard L. Elias, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

*809Burnett Roth, Miami Beach, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that Title 7, Section 6a, U.S. Code Annotated, creating the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, awarded exclusive jurisdiction to this Federal agency to conduct investigations of interstate1 commodity transactions. With this interpretation we agree. *International Trading Ltd. v. Bell,*556 S.W.2d 420 (Ark.1977); *State v. Monex International Limited,*527 S.W.2d 804 (Tex.Civ.App.1975); *Clayton Brokerage Company of St. Louis, Inc. v. Mouer,*531 S.W.2d 805 (Tex.1975); *Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Commodity Exchange, Inc.,*546 F.2d 1361 (10th Cir. 1976).

Therefore, the final judgment under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

1

. The State of Florida, through its appropriate officials has the power to investigate and prosecute intrastate commodity transactions, which may be fraudulent as to its citizens.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Dominica National Day

# 									Dominica National Day							

Press Release

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 3, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, congratulations to the people of Dominica on the 45th anniversary of your independence.

Dominica and the United States share an enduring commitment to tackle complex and critical issues, including climate resilience, energy security, and citizen security. Our partnership is based on shared democratic values and a common vision for inclusive and sustainable prosperity.

The United States and Dominica will continue our work together under the U.S.-Caribbean Partnership to Address the Climate Crisis (PACC 2030), which includes technical assistance to advance geothermal energy for the people of Dominica. Our countries will also continue cooperation through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative to combat transnational organized crime and illicit trafficking.

Best wishes from me and the American people for a happy and prosperous year ahead for all the people of Dominica.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDominicaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 423.558 Scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the requirements relating to the following: ( 1 ) Part D plan sponsors with respect to grievances, coverage determinations, and redeterminations.
( 2 ) Part D IRE with respect to reconsiderations.
( 3 ) Part D enrollees' rights with respect to grievances, coverage determinations, redeterminations, and reconsiderations.
( 4 ) Review of at-risk determinations made under a drug management program in accordance with § 423.153(f).
( b ) The requirements regarding reopenings, ALJ hearings and ALJ and attorney adjudicator decisions, Council review, and judicial review are set forth in subpart U of this chapter.
[74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5125, Jan. 17, 2017; 83 FR 16750, Apr. 16, 2018]
Exhibit 99.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as adopted pursuant to
[SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

/s/  Marsha A. Mongeon
-----------------------------
     Marsha A. Mongeon
     Chief Financial Officer


March 31, 2003

<PAGE>