alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 418.205 Special requirements for hospice pre-election evaluation and counseling services. ( a ) *Definition.* As used in this section the following definition applies. *Terminal illness* has the same meaning as defined in § 418.3.
( b ) *General.* Effective January 1, 2005, payment for hospice pre-election evaluation and counseling services as specified in § 418.304(d) may be made to a hospice on behalf of a Medicare beneficiary if the requirements of this section are met. ( 1 ) *The beneficiary.* The beneficiary: ( i ) Has been diagnosed as having a terminal illness as defined in § 418.3.
( ii ) Has not made a hospice election.
( iii ) Has not previously received hospice pre-election evaluation and consultation services specified under this section.
( 2 ) *Services provided.* The hospice pre-election services include an evaluation of an individual's need for pain and symptom management and counseling regarding hospice and other care options. In addition, the services may include advising the individual regarding advanced care planning.
( 3 ) *Provision of pre-election hospice services.* ( i ) The services must be furnished by a physician.
( ii ) The physician furnishing these services must be an employee or medical director of the hospice billing for this service.
( iii ) The services cannot be furnished by hospice personnel other than employed physicians, such as but not limited to nurse practitioners, nurses, or social workers, physicians under contractual arrangements with the hospice or by the beneficiary's physician, if that physician is not an employee of the hospice.
( iv ) If the beneficiary's attending physician is also the medical director or a physician employee of the hospice, the attending physician may not provide nor may the hospice bill for this service because that physician already possesses the expertise necessary to furnish end-of-life evaluation and management, and counseling services.
( 4 ) *Documentation.* ( i ) If the individual's physician initiates the request for services of the hospice medical director or physician, appropriate documentation is required.
( ii ) The request or referral must be in writing, and the hospice medical director or physician employee is expected to provide a written note on the patient's medical record.
( iii ) The hospice agency employing the physician providing these services is required to maintain a written record of the services furnished.
( iv ) If the services are initiated by the beneficiary, the hospice agency is required to maintain a record of the services and documentation that communication between the hospice medical director or physician and the beneficiary's physician occurs, with the beneficiary's permission, to the extent necessary to ensure continuity of care.
[69 FR 66425, Nov. 15, 2004]
*EXHIBIT
      32.2*





**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dean
      Antonis, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Dean AntonisDean
                AntonisTreasurer
                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
                May 21, 2007











This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7078
In re: JOHN T. SCOTT, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-978-1) Submitted: October 8, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John T. Scott, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John T. Scott has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct officials of the State of North Carolina “to follow their own rules and regulations.” Scott further seeks to have this court direct the district court to file his legal documents and communicate with him. First, we lack jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. See Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Second, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, seeIn re Beard , 811 F.2d at 826, and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Scott has not shown that he lacks other adequate means to attain the relief he desires. Accordingly, although we grant Scott’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Further Measures to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank

# 									Further Measures to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 1, 2024

The United States has consistently opposed actions that undermine stability in the West Bank and the prospects of peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians alike. This includes attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians and Palestinian attacks against Israelis.  There is no justification for extremist violence against civilians, whatever their national origin, ethnicity, or religion.

The United States is today implementing a series of measures to address such actions in the West Bank and impose accountability for those responsible for them.

The Department of State is imposing financial sanctions on four Israeli nationals/individuals connected to violence against civilians in the West Bank.  These designations have been imposed under a new Executive Order establishing U.S. authority to issue financial sanctions against those directing or participating in acts or threats of violence against civilians, intimidation of civilians to cause them to leave their homes, destruction or seizure of property, or terrorist activity in the West Bank.

Israel must do more to stop violence against civilians in the West Bank and hold accountable those responsible for it.  The United States will continue to take actions to advance the foreign policy objectives of the United States, including the viability of a two-state solution, and is committed to the safety, security, and dignity of Israelis and Palestinians alike.

*This new E.O. authorizes the imposition of sanctions on any foreign person determined to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged or attempted to engage in actions – including directing, enacting, implementing, enforcing, or failing to enforce policies – that threaten the peace, security, or stability of the West Bank, as well as other specified harmful activities. For more information on today’s action, please see the State Department’sFact Sheet and Frequently Asked Questions.*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsIsraelOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesPeaceSanctionsThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
#### Marcus HOLMES, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. AI-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Marcus Holmes, pro se.

No response by appellee,

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus has been treated as an appeal from an administrative order. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission in this case is affirmed.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
# C_2005309EN.01001002.xml

| 7.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3752 — Verizon/MCI)

(2005/C 309/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3752. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3752. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Additional Information - No Comments Received Form
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLocal and Global Bifurcations of Flow Fields During Physical Vapor Transport: Application to a Microgravity ExperimentThe local bifurcation of the flow field, during physical vapor transport for a parametric range of experimental interest, shows that its dynamical state ranges from steady to aperiodic. Comparison of computationally predicted velocity profiles with laser doppler velocimetry measurements shows reasonable agreement in both magnitude and planform. Correlation of experimentally measured crystal quality with the predicted dynamical state of the flow field shows a degradation of quality with an increase in Rayleigh number. The global bifurcation of the flow field corresponding to low crystal quality indicates the presence of a traveling wave for Ra = 1.09 x 10(exp 5). For this Rayleigh number threshold a chaotic transport state occurs. However, a microgravity environment for this case effectively stabilizes the flow to diffusive-advective and provides the setting to grow crystals with optimal quality.Document ID19970009621Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsDuval, W. M. B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Singh, N. B.*(Northrop Grumman Corp. Pittsburgh, PA United States)*Glicksman, M. E.*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryMaterials ProcessingReport/Patent NumberE-10541NAS 1.15:107372NASA-TM-107372Meeting InformationMeeting: American Conference on Crystal GrowthLocation: Vail, COCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 4, 1996End Date: August 9, 1996Sponsors:American Association for Crystal GrowthAccession Number97N15021Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 962-20-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009621.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>
           
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,217,960
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    254,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,032,128
<PP&E>                                         41,740,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,810,601)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,528,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,555,410
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,500,000
<COMMON>                                       36,447
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,528,299
<SALES>                                        9,584,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,584,784
<CGS>                                          3,376,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,275,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (691,126)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,616,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,307,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,307,789)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,307,789)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### Daniel R. HOUSE, Jr., Petitioner, v. Lois Marie HOUSE, Respondent.

No. 47202.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 9, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 310 So.2d 73.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
HomeForeign Language Training...Foreign Language Training Employment Opportunities

# 									Foreign Language Training Employment Opportunities							

Foreign Service Institute

The School of Language Studies employs motivated individuals who are interested in making a difference in our relationships with other countries through the development of U.S. diplomats’ foreign language skills. We look for applicants with expertise in second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and foreign language and adult education to train Department of State personnel for their real-world, high-stake jobs. Our positions include:

**Language Training Supervisor**Oversee intensive foreign language training programs for foreign affairs professionals as you develop new programs to meet changing needs, take advantage of new instructional technology, counsel and evaluate students and instructors, and interface with career development officers, embassies, and other government agencies on professional training needs.

**Language Training Specialist**Use your expertise in second language acquisition to counsel and coach students, conduct teacher training workshops, and lead projects for the development and revision of language curricula.

**Language and Culture Instructor**Help diplomats prepare for their assignments abroad as you teach your native language and culture at the Foreign Service Institute. With classes in over 70 languages, FSI offers a variety of full- and part-time courses to meet the varied job requirements of Americans serving abroad.

If you are interested in Federal direct-hire opportunities in the School of Language Studies at the Foreign Service Institute, you may search for job openings or subscribe for vacancy announcements. If you are interested in opportunities working as a Language and Culture Instructor or Language Tester, you may email the School of Language Studies for the list of contract companies supporting the School.

To learn about the Madeline E. Ehrman Fellowship in Second Language Acquisition, please see here.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50121 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE LUIS NOVA-RIVERA, also known as Jose Luis Rivera-Garcia Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1769-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis Nova-Rivera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court isAFFIRMED.
# C_2006096EN.01000201.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/2

---

References for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg by orders of that court of 10 and 12 January 2006 in Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH (Case C-37/06) and ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH (Case C-58/06) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Cases C-37/06 and C-58/06)

(2006/C 96/03)

Language of the cases: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by orders of the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Hamburg Finance Court) of 10 and 12 January 2006, received at the Court Registry on 23 January 2006 and 3 February 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH (Case C-37/06) and ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH (Case C-58/06) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas on the following questions:

| 1. | Is Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 615/98 (1) valid inasmuch as it links the grant of an export refund to compliance with Directive 91/628/EEC (2) on the protection of animals during transport? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 615/98 (1) valid inasmuch as it links the grant of an export refund to compliance with Directive 91/628/EEC (2) on the protection of animals during transport?

1

2

| 2. | If the first question should be answered in the affirmative: Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 615/98, according to which export refunds are not to be paid for animals for which the competent authority considers, in the light of all elements at its disposal concerning compliance with Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 615/98, that the Directive on the protection of animals during transport was not complied with, compatible with the principle of proportionality? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question should be answered in the affirmative: Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 615/98, according to which export refunds are not to be paid for animals for which the competent authority considers, in the light of all elements at its disposal concerning compliance with Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 615/98, that the Directive on the protection of animals during transport was not complied with, compatible with the principle of proportionality?

---

(1)  OJ L 82, p. 19.

1

(2)  OJ L 340, p. 17.

2

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.3 MA organizations' use of reinsurance. ( a ) An MA organization may obtain insurance or make other arrangements for the cost of providing basic benefits to an individual enrollee in either of the following ways— ( 1 ) The MA organization must retain risk for at least the first $10,000 in costs per individual enrollee for providing basic benefits during a contract year; or
( 2 ) If the MA organization uses insurance or makes other arrangements for sharing such costs proportionately on a per member per year first dollar basis, the MA organization must retain risk based on the following: ( i ) The actuarially equivalent value of the retained risk is greater than or equal to the value of risk retained in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( ii ) The MA organization makes a determination of actuarial equivalence based on reasonable actuarial methods. For example, a reasonable method for determining actuarial equivalence would be to equate the percentage of net claim costs that the MA organization would retain under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(i) of this section.
( b ) In evaluating compliance with section 1855(b) of the Act and with paragraph (a) of this section, CMS will consider a parent organization and any of its subsidiaries to be part of the MA organization.
( c ) The type of payment arrangement used between an MA organization and contracting physicians, other health professionals or institutions for the financial risk specified in section 1855(b)(4) of the Act (that is, the financial risk on a prospective basis for the provision of basic benefit by those physicians or other health professionals or through those institutions) is not limited by paragraph (a) of this section.
[85 FR 33901, June 2, 2020]