alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeStatus Lists for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Fisheries Status Lists

# 						Fisheries Status Lists					

7 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2003199919981994195619491946

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeDepositary – Treaty Affairs

          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		1. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, done at Washington December 2, 1946.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		2. Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica for the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, done at Washington May 31, 1949.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		3. Protocol to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, signed at Washington under date of December 2, 1946, done at Washington November 19, 1956.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		4. Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea, done at Washington June 16,1994.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		5. Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program, done at Washington May 21, 1998.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		6. Protocol to Amend the 1949 Convention on the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, done at Guayaquil June 11, 1999.	   
          -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		7. Convention for the Strengthening of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Established by the 1949 Convention Between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica, done at Washington June 27, 2003.	   

Back to Top
§ 403.232 Requirements and procedures for obtaining certification. ( a ) To be certified by CMS, a policy must meet— ( 1 ) The NAIC model standards specified in § 403.210;
( 2 ) The loss ratio standards specified in § 403.215; and
( 3 ) Any State requirements applicable to a policy— ( i ) Issued in that State; or
( ii ) Marketed in that State.
( b ) An insuring organization requesting certification of a policy must submit the following to CMS for review— ( 1 ) A copy of the policy form (including all the documents that would constitute the contract of insurance that is proposed to be marketed as a certified policy).
( 2 ) A copy of the application form including all attachments.
( 3 ) A copy of the uniform certificate issued under a group policy.
( 4 ) A copy of the outline of coverage, in the form prescribed by the NAIC model standards.
( 5 ) A copy of the Medicare supplement buyers' guide to be provided to all applicants if the buyers' guide is not the CMS/NAIC buyers' guide.
( 6 ) A statement of when and how the outline of coverage and the buyers' guide will be delivered and copies of applicable receipt forms.
( 7 ) A copy of the notice of replacement and statement as to when and how that notice will be delivered.
( 8 ) A list of States in which the policy is authorized for sale. If the policy was approved under a deemer provision in any State, the conditions involved must be specified.
( 9 ) A copy of the loss ratio calculations, as specified in § 403.250.
( 10 ) Loss ratio supporting data, as specified in § 403.256.
( 11 ) A statement of actuarial opinion, as specified in § 403.258.
( 12 ) A statement that the insuring organization will notify the policyholders in writing, within the period of time specified in § 403.245(c), if the policy is identified as a certified policy at the time of sale and later loses certification.
( 13 ) A signed statement in which the president of the insuring organization, or a designee, attests that— ( i ) The policy meets the requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( ii ) The information submitted to CMS for review is accurate and complete and does not misrepresent any material fact.
# C_2005262EN.01000201.xml

| 21.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 October 2005

(2005/C 262/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1953 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4629 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4650 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5511 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 72,09 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5731 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,740 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,51 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9000 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6075 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,933 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6334 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5919 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4062 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7123 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0261 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8953 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6706 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3625 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 054,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,512 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,590 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2470 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,874 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1953

JPY

Japanese yen

138,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4629

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4650

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5511

ISK

Iceland króna

72,09

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5731

CZK

Czech koruna

29,740

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,51

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9000

RON

Romanian leu

3,6075

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,933

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6334

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5919

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4062

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7123

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0261

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,94

ZAR

South African rand

7,8953

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6706

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3625

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 054,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,512

PHP

Philippine peso

66,590

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2470

THB

Thai baht

48,874

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10772

Summary Calendar

 

JOSEPH STEWART, III,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF TEXAS; WARDEN TREON; 

RICHARD WATHEN, Warden, Allred Unit; 

NO FIRST NAME MOONEYHAM; NO FIRST NAME MUNOZ, DR.;

NO FIRST NAME DIDLO, DR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:01-CV-78-R

--------------------

October 17, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Texas state prisoner # 602302 Joseph

Stewart’s application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)

is DENIED, because the appeal lacks arguable merit and is

therefore frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th

Cir. 1997). Because the appeal is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER

ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
No. 01-10772

- 2 -

There is no arguable merit to Stewart’s contention that he

had the right to file a federal criminal complaint against the

State of Texas and some of its prison officials. See, e.g., Bass

v. Angler Sportsman Society v. United States Steel Corp., 324

F. Supp. 412, 415 (S.D. Ala.), aff’d, 447 F.2d 1304 (5th Cir.

1971); Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246-48 (5th Cir.

1967).

The district court did not err by treating Stewart’s

pleading as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as

frivolous and by not sua sponte granting him leave to amend it. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33

(1992).

The dismissal of Stewart’s complaint as frivolous and the

dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each counts as a “strike”

for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We note that

Stewart has at least one other strike against him. See Stewart

v. Scott, No. G-95-15 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 1996). By accumulating

three strikes, Stewart is BARRED from proceeding in forma

pauperis in any subsequent civil action or appeal filed while he

is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stewart’s motions for appointment

of counsel and oral argument are DENIED.

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR

INVOKED.
# C_2006052EN.01002301.xml

| 2.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/23

---

F-Cayenne: operation of scheduled air services

Notice of cancellation of the invitation to tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand and Mariapasoula, Saül et Grand-Santi via Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni on the other

(‘Supplement to the
  Official Journal of the European Union’ S 10 of 17.1.2006, open procedure, 10383-2006)

Official Journal of the European Union

(2006/C 52/11)

Conseil régional de la Guyane, direction du développement, de l'économie et de l'aménagement, service aménagement et développement du territoire, route de Montabo, rond-point de Suzini, 3ème étage, BP 7025, F-97307 Cayenne Cedex. Tél.: (594) 27 11 93. Fax: (594) 27 12 88.

ème

France has decided to cancel the invitations to tender issued pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand and Maripasoula, Saül and Grand-Santi via Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni on the other which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 17 January 2006 under reference 2006/C11/16.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with People’s Republic of China Executive Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with People’s Republic of China Executive Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 27, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary Campbell spoke yesterday with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Executive Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu. The call was part of ongoing efforts to maintain open lines of communication between the United States and the PRC and responsibly manage competition in the relationship. They discussed a range of issues important to the bilateral relationship, and other regional and global issues, including areas of difference and areas of cooperation. The Deputy Secretary underscored the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, in the South China Sea, and on the Korean Peninsula. He also raised concerns over the PRC’s support for the Russian defense industrial base.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsChinaDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of
           Income included in the Company's Form 10-K for the period ended
           December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
           such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<CASH>                                            3,362
<SECURITIES>                                      5,209
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                        330
<INVENTORY>                                       8,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27,399
<PP&E>                                            7,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,687
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             10
<OTHER-SE>                                       27,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32,536
<SALES>                                          49,105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 49,105
<CGS>                                            24,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,505
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $0.47


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41066

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MARQUEZ-FERRER, also known as Rogelio Marquez-Guajardo, 

also known as Jose Garza-Ferreyes,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-362-1

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appointed counsel for Jose Marquez-Ferrer, the Federal Public

Defender, has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Marquez-Ferrer has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
,, 

r-:-1·· 

I 

24. Corroaion Da~a Survey. 

Enginee¥So 1967. 

National Association of Corroaion 

c 

..... 

I 

0 

(11 

...., 

I
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                          55,820
<SECURITIES>                                    15,484
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,224
<PP&E>                                         119,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (75,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,675
<OTHER-SE>                                         645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,822
<SALES>                                        194,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,233
<CGS>                                           29,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                       391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                956
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       956
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
n_____MARYLANDDEPARTMENTOFTHEENVIRONMENT1800WashingtonBoulevard•Baltimoe21230N/IDE410-537-3000•1-800-633-6101—MartinO’MalleyRobertM.Summers,Ph.D.GovernorSecretaryAnthonyG.BrownLieutenantGovernorRECEiVEDMAR052012Mr.ShawnM.GarvinEPA.REGION111RegionalAdministratorOFFICEOFREGIONALADMINISTRATCU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIII1650ArchStreet(3RAOO)RECE\/EDPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029MAR052012DearMr.GarvinOnApril3,2008,MarylandofficiallyrequestedEPAapprovalofthefollowingstateimplementationplan(SIP)revision:MarylandStateImplementationPlan(SIP)forFineParticle(PM2.5)Standardand2002BaseYearInventoryfortheWashingtonDC-MD-VANonattainmentAreaTheplanrevisiondemonstratedtheimprovementsmadetotheairqualityintheWashingtonDC-MDVANonattainmentArea(“theArea”)andtheeffortstakentoachievethe1997nationalambientairqualitystandard(NAAQS)forPM2.5by2009.ThisSIPrevisionfortheWashingtonDC-MD-VAareaincluded:(i)theattainmentplan;(ii)ananalysisofreasonablyavailablecontrolmeasures;(iii)anattainmentdemonstration;(iv)contingencyplansforfailuretoattaintheairqualitystandard;(v)mobilesourcebudgets;and(vi)thebaseyear2002airpollutantemissionsinventory.AirqualityhassignificantlyimprovedintheWashingtonDC-MD-VAarea.OnJanuary12,2009(74FR1146),EPAdeterminedthattheAreahadattainedtheNAAQSandissuedacleandatadeterminationfortheArea.ThisdeterminationsuspendedtherequirementsforMarylandtosubmitattainmentdemonstrationsandassociatedreasonablyavailablecontrolmeasures,reasonablefurtherprogressplans,contingencymeasures,andotherplanningSIPsrelatedtoattainmentoftheNAAQSintheArea.ThepurposeofthisletteristowithdrawtheseportionsoftheApril3,2008submittal.Specifically,theStateofMarylandherebywithdraws:(i)theattainmentplan;(ii)theanalysisofreasonablyavailablecontrolmeasures;(iii)theattainmentdemonstration;(iv)thecontingencyplansforfailuretoattaintheairqualitystandard;and(v)themobilesourcebudgets,allofwhichweresubmittedonApril3,2008.ToensurethatMarylandhasmettherequirementsofSection172(c)(3)oftheCleanAirActregardinginventorysubmittals,theStateisnotrequestingthewithdrawalofthebaseyear2002airpollutantemissionsinventory,whichcomprisesChapter3andAppendixBoftheoriginalApril3,2008SIPsubmission.•.__••_•.RecycledPaperwww.mde.state.md.usTTYUsers1-800-735-2258ViaMarylandRelayService

# CMr.ShawnM.GarvinPage2Onarelatedmatter,Maryland,incooperationwiththeDistrictofColumbia,Virginia,andtheMetropolitanWashingtonCouncilofGovernments,isdevelopingaredesignationrequestandmaintenanceplanfortheWashingtonDC-MD-VAareawithrespecttothe1997PM2.5NAAQS.Thisrequestandplan,whichwillcontainmobilevehicleemissionsbudgetsdevelopedusingMOVES2O10,isexpectedtobereadyforfinalsubmittaltoEPAin2012.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthesemattersorrequireadditionalinformation,pleasecontactMr.George(Tad)S.Abum,Jr.,DirectoroftheAirandRadiationManagementAdministrationat410-537-3255,orbyemail,atgabummde.state.md.us.Sincerely,Secretarycc:DianaEsher,Director,AirProtectionDivision,EPARegionIIIGeorge(Tad)S.Aburn,Jr.,Director,AirandRadiationManagementAdministrationRecycledPaperwww.mde.state.md.usTTYUsers1-800-735-2258ViaMarylandRelayService
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4058 — Logista/Planeta de Agostini/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 293/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
ORDER OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

Order Pronounced January 27, 2015 

14-0851 IN RE KOOL SMILES DENTAL LITIGATION 

 

 Benevis, LLC f/k/a NCDR, LLC, et al.’s motion to stay, filed January 23, 2015, 

is granted. All trial court proceedings in the cases listed in the Appendix of the Motion to 

Transfer are stayed until further order of the MDL Panel.
# C_2006131EN.01000902.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-122/04) (1)

1

(Powers of the Commission - Procedures for the exercise of implementing powers - Implementation of the Forest Focus programme)

(2006/C 131/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by C.-F. Durand and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by K. Bradley and M. Gómez-Leal), Council of the European Union (represented by I. Díez Parra and M. Balta, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners: Kingdom of Spain (represented by M. Muñoz Pérez, Agent), Republic of Finland (represented by T. Pynnä, Agent)

Interveners:

Re:

Re

Annulment of Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus) (OJ 2003 L 324, p. 1), in so far as it makes the adoption of the implementing measures for the Forest Focus Programme subject to the regulatory procedure set out in Article 5 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ 1999 L 184, p. 23) — Limit on the Council's choice between the implementing procedures laid down by Decision 1999/468/EC

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.04.2004.

1

---