alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Uruguayan Economy Minister Arbeleche

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Uruguayan Economy Minister Arbeleche							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

November 8, 2021

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman met with Uruguayan Economy Minister Azucena Arbeleche today in Montevideo, Uruguay. Deputy Secretary Sherman and Economy Minister Arbeleche discussed how the United States and Uruguay can work together to build back better and create inclusive economic growth after the COVID-19 pandemic, and how Uruguay’s leadership on climate change and clean energy can create good jobs for Uruguayans. Their discussion advances our ongoing collaboration to promote opportunity and prosperity in both countries.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonUruguay

Back to Top
HomeSenegal

# Senegal

108 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Dr. John Nkengasong, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy	  John N. NkengasongFebruary 28, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Senegal	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Burkina Faso, Niger, and Senegal	  February 10, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Senegalese President Sall	  December 13, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken and Senegalese President and AU Chairperson Macky Sall Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022Walter E. Washington Convention CenterWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken at the Peace, Security, and Governance Forum	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022Walter E. Washington Convention CenterWashington, D.C.  
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe’s Travel to Cote d’Ivoire and Senegal	  December 6, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Hussain Travels to Morocco, The Gambia, and Senegal	  November 28, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Medina’s Remarks for COP 27 Session “STRONG MEDICINE:  U.S. Progress in Enhancing Health System Sustainability and Resilience at Home and Abroad,”	  Monica MedinaNovember 15, 2022Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt 
        -    Remarks  		Ambassador-at-Large Beth Van Schaack’s Remarks to the Case Western Reserve University School of Law: "International Law & The New Cold War"	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 30, 2022Case Western Reserve University School of LawCleveland, Ohio 

previous page123456…11next page

Back to Top
# Niger

137 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 2, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 2, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum	  August 1, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with African Union Commission Chairperson Faki About the Attempted Takeover in Niger	  August 1, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 31, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 31, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Extraordinary ECOWAS Summit on Niger	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Nigerian President Bola Tinubu	  July 29, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with French Foreign Minister Colonna	  July 28, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Calls with Nigerien President Bazoum and Former President Issoufou	  July 28, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 27, 2023	  Vedant PatelJuly 27, 2023 

previous page1…34567…14next page

Back to Top
# C_2006096EN.01003801.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/38

---

Action brought on 15 February 2006 — Augenault and Others v Council

(Case F-16/06)

(2006/C 96/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Françoise Augenault and Others (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare the action admissible and well founded, including the objection of illegality contained in it; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action admissible and well founded, including the objection of illegality contained in it;

| — | consequently, annul the applicants' pension statements for March 2005, so as to result in the application of a weighting for the capital of their country of residence or, at least, of a weighting such as to reflect adequately the differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and therefore to give effect to the principle of equivalence; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul the applicants' pension statements for March 2005, so as to result in the application of a weighting for the capital of their country of residence or, at least, of a weighting such as to reflect adequately the differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and therefore to give effect to the principle of equivalence;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical to those relied on in Case F-128/05 Adolf and Others v Commission (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 60 of 11.3.2006, p. 56.

1

---
# C_2006036EN.01002704.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/27

---

Removal from the register of Case C-153/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 36/57)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

By order of 11 October 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-153/05: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

---

(1)  OJ C 143 of 11.6.2005.

1

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/Address
Date reissued018606N
All Merit Express, Inc., 19702 Miguel Ave., Cerritos, CA 90703
August 17, 2009.016258N
International Freight Consolidators, Inc., 1160 N.W. 21st Terrace, Miami, FL 33127
July 30, 2009.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E9-21679 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William CLAYTON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 63078.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: William Clayton, applying for writ of habeas corpus/remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
#### Louise C. SANDERS v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, EAST LOUISIANA STATE HOSPITAL.

No. 67130.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1980.

In re Department of Health and Human Resources, East Louisiana State Hospital, *986applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Civil Service Commission. 383 So.2d 1053.

Granted.
HomeChina

# China

925 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with People’s Republic of China Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong	  April 26, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with People’s Republic of China Director of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Foreign Affairs Commission and Foreign Minister Wang Yi	  April 26, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And People’s Republic of China Director of the Chinese Communist Party Central Foreign Affairs Commission and Foreign Minister Wang Yi Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 25, 2024Diaoyutai State GuesthouseBeijing, People's Republic of China 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 25, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 25, 2024WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining	  April 25, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Discussion with Business Leaders	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 25, 2024ShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Discussion with NYU Shanghai Students	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 24, 2024ShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 24, 2024Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 24, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 24, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    		Travel to the People’s Republic of China, April 24-26, 2024	   

previous page1…34567…93next page

Back to Top
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert A. Lindeman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Max & Erma’sRestaurants, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: February 25, 2008         /s/ Robert A. Lindeman   Robert A. Lindeman   President and Chief Executive Officer
1

Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 3:55 PM

To: Aaron Szabo (aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov)

Cc: Beaver, Melinda; Gabrilovich, Lev; Long, Pam; Wood, Anna; Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; 

Smith, Kristi; VanLare, Paula

Subject: Re: Draft responses to consolidated interagency comments on the Exceptional Events Rule 

NPRM

Attachments: EO12866_Exceptional Events_2060-AS02_NPRM_PreambleRule_20151023_Final.docx; 

EO12866_Exceptional Events_2060-AS02_NPRM_PreambleRule_final compare 20151008 

to 20151023.docx; Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 

ExEvents_final consolidated_102315.docx

Aaron ‐ 

Attached please find a clean version of the Exceptional Events Rule revisions NPRM that incorporates changes resulting

from OMB/interagency review. I have also attached a "compare" document, which compares today's 10/23/15 clean

version of the NPRM to the 10/8/15 version that was accepted by OMB. In addition, as we discussed earlier this week,

the attached comment response document consolidates and responds to the OMB/interagency comments that we

received on Monday 10/19 and Wednesday 10/21. (The page numbers identified in our responses in this document refer

to the "clean" version of the NPRM rather than the "compare" version.)

Please let me know whether you have any additional comments or questions.  

Regards,

Beth

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539‐04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov  

919.541.5432
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00566

- CV
C.L. Thomas, Inc. and Thomas Fuels Lubricants & Chemicals, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company and Acordia of Texas, Inc.

On Appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No . 09

- 9

- 69174

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court ord ers the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and against a ppell ee

. We further order this dec ision certified below for observance. September 11, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   461
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         70
<COMMON>                                         10280
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14722)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       461
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (513)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (205154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (205154)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (205154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (205667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### CITY OF SUNRISE, a municipal corporation in Broward County, State of Florida, Appellant, v. TOWN OF DAVIE, a municipal corporation in Broward County, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-976.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 2, 1981.

*1355Arthur B. Parkhurst of Parkhurst, Pickford, Ayers & Carlson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Barry Webber, Town Atty., Davie, and Grover G. Herring of Herring & Fulton, West Palm Beach, for appellee-Town of Davie.

HURLEY, Judge.

Appellant, the City of Sunrise, brings this appeal pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(B), Fla. R.App.P., to challenge the issuance of a temporary injunction. The record reveals that the appellee, the Town of Davie, failed to establish a likelihood of irreparable injury and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. Therefore, we quash the temporary injunction.

The underlying cause of action involves an effort by the Town of Davie to permanently enjoin the City of Sunrise from enacting an ordinance to annex certain property. The propriety of this action, i. e., whether it is permissible for Davie to seek such permanent injunctive relief, is not before us and we refrain from expressing an opinion on that issue. We deal only with the narrow question of whether the trial court abused its discretion by issuing a temporary injunction.

The prerequisites for a temporary injunction were set forth in *Department of Business Regulation v. Provende, Inc.,*399 So.2d 1038 (Fla.3d DCA 1981):

> In deciding whether it may exercise the constitutional grant of jurisdiction to issue temporary injunctive relief, the court must decide whether the petitioner has established the elements which the courts have found necessary to the granting of injunctive relief: (a) *the likelihood of irreparable harm, and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law,*(b) the substantial likelihood of success on the merits, (e) that the threatened injury to petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent and, (d) that the granting of preliminary injunction will not deceive the public interest. *Id.*at 1041 (emphasis supplied).

We have carefully reviewed the evidence which Davie presented to support the motion and cannot discern anything that would substantiate a finding of a likelihood of irreparable harm. In particular, Davie failed to establish the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. Our Supreme Court in *Orange County v. City of Orlando,*327 So.2d 7 (Fla.1976), indicated that quo warranto, a proceeding at law, is the proper method for testing municipal annexation. The court, however, noted the following exception:

> In the event quo warranto is not available, i. e., the Attorney General refuses to allow quo warranto to proceed, then an action for injunctive and declaratory relief would be proper. *Id.*at 8.

Since Davie failed to plead and prove that quo warranto is unavailable, it did not meet an essential requirement for injunctive relief. Therefore, we are compelled to hold that the trial court abused its discretion and that the temporary injunction must be QUASHED.

ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                 TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 EXHIBIT II

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  ----------------------------------------


                               Six Months Ended            Three Months Ended
                                   April 30,                     April 30,
                              1 9 9 9      1 9 9 8         1 9 9 9      1 9 9 8
                              -------      -------         -------      -------
<S>                     <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Basic earnings:
  Net loss                 $ (209,704)   $ (193,411)    $   (9,347)    $(160,365)

Shares:
  Weighted common shares
    outstanding             2,141,801     2,117,053      2,141,801      2,122,331
  Warrants to consultants          --            --             --             --
  Employee stock options           --            --             --             --
  Consultant stock options         --            --             --             --
                            ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Total weighted shares
    outstanding             2,141,801     2,117,053      2,141,801      2,122,331
                            ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Primary earnings per
    common share           $     (.10)   $     (.09)    $       --     $     (.08)
                           ==========    ==========     ==========     ==========

Diluted earnings:
  Net loss                 $ (209,704)   $ (193,411)    $   (9,347)    $ (160,365)

Shares:
  Weighted common shares
    outstanding             2,141,801     2,117,053      2,141,801      2,122,331
  Warrants to consultants          --            --             --             --
  Employee stock options           --            --             --             --
  Consultant stock options         --            --             --             --
                            ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Total weighted shares
    outstanding             2,141,801     2,117,053      2,141,801      2,112,331
                            ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Diluted earnings per
    common share           $     (.10)   $     (.09)    $       --     $     (.08)
                           ==========    ==========     ==========     ==========




</TABLE>