alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Home
- Programs
- Remarks and Publications
- Resources
- Global Coalition
- Webinar Week 2021
- Fentanyl Advisories

HomeAddressing the Overdose Crisis...Fentanyl Advisories

# 									Fentanyl Advisories							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

#### Advisory to the Chemical Manufacturing Industry on Illicit Activity and Methods Related to the Manufacturing of Fentanyl and Synthetic Opioids  [743 KB]

Drug Trafficking Organizations (DTOs) purchase illicit fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and other synthetic opioids, primarily from Chinese fentanyl suppliers, and prepare these drugs for individual use and redistribution.  DTOs may increasingly seek these drugs from other sources and/or expand their acquisition of the precursors and equipment needed for clandestine synthesis.

#### Advisory to Digital Private Sector Platforms on Illicit Activity and Methods Related to the Marketing of Fentanyl and Synthetic Opioids  [424 KB]

Criminal actors leverage digital platforms—social media applications and websites, communications applications, e-commerce platforms, and other private sector entities—to engage in the marketing of fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and other synthetic opioids.

#### Advisory to the Shipping Industry on the Illicit Movement Methods Related to the Trafficking of Fentanyl and Other Synthetic Opioids   [923 KB]

Transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), particularly Mexican TCOs, in addition to Chinese fentanyl suppliers,and internet purchasers located in the U.S., engage in the trafficking of illicit fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and other synthetic opioids.

#### Advisory to Financial Institutions on Illicit Financial Schemes and Methods Related to the Trafficking of Fentanyl and Other Synthetic Opioids  [709 KB]

Transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), including Mexican, Chinese and other foreign fentanyl suppliers, and Internet purchasers located in the United States, engage in the trafficking of fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and other synthetic opioids and the subsequent laundering of the proceeds from such illegal sales.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrugsNarcoticsOpioids

Back to Top
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management
Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.




/s/ Beverly A. Cummings
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 12322 Civilian noninstitutional population Number in thousands 65 to 69 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU00024938Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Population Level - 65-69 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:01 PM)
II

Calendar No. 430

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3120

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 1996

Received

JUNE 7, 1996

Read the first time

JUNE 10, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

witness retaliation, witness tampering and jury tampering.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That title 18, United States Code, is amended—

4 (1) in section 1513—
2

•HR 3120 PCS

1 (A) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub2 section (d); and

3 (B) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(c) If the retaliation occurred because of attendance

5 at or testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of

6 imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense under

7 this section shall be the higher of that otherwise provided

8 by law or the maximum term that could have been im9 posed for any offense charged in such case.’’;

10 (2) in section 1512, by adding at the end the

11 following:

12 ‘‘(i) If the offense under this section occurs in connec13 tion with a trial of a criminal case, the maximum term

14 of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense

15 shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or

16 the maximum term that could have been imposed for any

17 offense charged in such case.’’; and

18 (3) in section 1503(a), by adding at the end the

19 following: ‘‘If the offense under this section occurs

20 in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the

21 act in violation of this section involves the threat of

22 physical force or physical force, the maximum term

23 of imprisonment which may be imposed for the of24 fense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided
3

•HR 3120 PCS

1 by law or the maximum term that could have been

2 imposed for any offense charged in such case.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 430

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3120

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, with reand jury tampering. spect to witness retaliation, witness tampering

JUNE 10, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DENNIS C. HUDSON, DENISE §

LYNN DUTTON, JUAN §

LOPEZ, and HOMERO §

and MARIA RAMIREZ, §

 § No. 226, 2022

Plaintiffs Below, §

Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery

 § of the State of Delaware

v. §

 § C.A. No: 2021-0800

THE STATE OF DELAWARE §

DEPARTMENT OF §

TRANSPORTATION, §

§

Defendant Below, §

Appellee, and §

 §

MEDING FAMILY, LLC, §

a Delaware limited liability company, §

KAY-DE-DID, LLC, §

a Delaware limited liability company, §

ROB’S RIDES, LLC, § 

a Delaware limited liability company, §

and ROBERT WAYNE MEDING §

and MELINDA MEDING, §

 §

Nominal Defendants §

Below, Nominal §

Appellees, §

Submitted: December 14, 2022

Decided: January 30, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.
2

ORDER

This 30th day of January 2023, after consideration of the parties’ briefs and the 

record on appeal, it appears to the Court that:

1. This order incorporates the factual background and reasoning set forth 

in our order, filed today, in JMER Properties, LLC v. Del. Dep’t of Transp., No. 225, 

2022 (the “JMER Order”).

2. When, as described in the JMER Order, the Court of Chancery 

dismissed JMER’s action as unripe, it also dismissed a similar action brought by the 

appellants—a group of homeowners who reside near the Medings’ property—

against the same defendants.

1

 Although never formally consolidated, the two actions 

were heard together in the Court of Chancery.

3. The homeowners own three homes on the southern border of the 

Meding property, each with direct access to State Route 1 through their driveways. 

The gravamen of the homeowners’ complaint is that the Medings’ proposed new 

entrance would require the homeowners to close their direct driveway access to State 

Route 1 and re-orient access to their properties through their backyards and onto a 

secondary road network.

4. DelDOT’s position throughout this case, however, has been 

unequivocal: it has no plans to close the homeowners’ driveways or eliminate the 

1 Opening Br., Ex. 1.
3

homeowners’ access to State Route 1. The Court of Chancery pledged to hear the 

homeowners’ complaint in the event that DelDOT ever reversed course and 

eliminated the homeowners’ direct access to State Route 1. Until then, and for the 

reasons stated in the JMER Order, the homeowners’ action is not ripe.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
# C_2006016EN.01000101.xml

| 21.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 January 2006

(2006/C 16/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2068 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68525 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3035 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5512 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,41 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0845 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,605 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,6 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8381 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6442 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,47 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,475 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,613 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6129 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,403 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3595 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,776 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9646 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 190,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,2537 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7326 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3835 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 386,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5195 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,9 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,151 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,248 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2068

JPY

Japanese yen

139,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68525

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3035

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5512

ISK

Iceland króna

74,41

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0845

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

28,605

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,6

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8381

RON

Romanian leu

3,6442

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,47

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,475

TRY

Turkish lira

1,613

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6129

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,403

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3595

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,776

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9646

KRW

South Korean won

1 190,75

ZAR

South African rand

7,2537

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7326

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3835

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 386,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5195

PHP

Philippine peso

63,9

RUB

Russian rouble

34,151

THB

Thai baht

47,248

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Frank Brito *v.*The City of Waterbury.

Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued April 7

decided May 6, 1943.

*116
      *Andrew D. Dawson,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Maurice T. Healey,*with whom was *Edward J. McDonald,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The defendant city erected a new bridge to take the place of one that was condemned as unsafe and, in doing so, lowered the grade of a street, constructed a retaining wall in front of the plaintiff’s property and provided entrances to it. It also purchased properties across the way, razed the buildings thereon and made ornamental grass plots. The defendant’s bureau of assessments found that the damages to and benefits of the plaintiff, because of the work, were equal. The plaintiff appealed from this finding and the trial court confirmed and adopted the assessment and dismissed the appeal. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed. The trial court found that the benefits and damages were each $3000. The plaintiff finds no fault with this appraisal of his damages but claims there is no basis for a finding of benefits. No attack is made on the finding of facts, the plaintiff assigning error in the conclusions drawn therefrom.

The plaintiff contends that the benefits were general and not special, and so benefits should not be assessed against him; and that the trial court assessed benefits on the ground that the new bridge and the removal of the buildings across the street from his property provided a better view and afforded more air and light. This, indeed, the trial court found, but it also found in a separate paragraph that the value of the plaintiff’s property was increased $3000 by the widening and change of grade. This finding has not been attacked and we may not say upon what it was based, for the evidence is not before us. For all we may know, there *117was expert testimony as to market value before and after thé taking and that the change was of special value to the plaintiff although of value to the public generally. While “benefits to be assessed in such proceedings as these must be special, as distinguished from the general benefits from the improvement to the public at large . . . the widening of a street, while it may be a general benefit to the public at large, may also result in a special benefit to an abutting owner. . . .” *Appeal of*Cohen, 117 Conn. 75, 83, 166 Atl. 747. *Trinity College*v. *Hartford,*32 Conn. 452, 476, 477.

There is no error.
#### § 124.11 Applicability of 45 CFR part 75.

The provisions of 45 CFR part 75, establishing uniform administrative requirements and cost principles, shall apply to all grants under this part.”.

[81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
# C_2006060EN.01001601.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 31 August 2005 in Dionik Anonimi Etairia Emporias I/I, Logismikou & Parokhis Ipirision Mikhanografisis (Dionik A.E.) and Ioannis Mikhail Pikoulas v Epitropi Kefalaiagoras

(Case C-430/05)

(2006/C 60/33)

Language of the case: Greek

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 31 August 2005, received at the Court Registry on 2 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Dionik Anonimi Etairia Emporias I/I, Logismikou & Parokhis Ipirision Mikhanografisis (Dionik A.E.) and Ioannis Mikhail Pikoulas and the Epitropi Kefalaiagoras (Capital Market Commission) on the following question:

In the light of Article 21 of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities (OJ 2001 L 184, p. 1), can a national legislature lay down, for cases where the information recorded in listing particulars proves to be inaccurate or misleading, administrative penalties imposable not only upon the persons expressly mentioned in those particulars as responsible but also upon the issuer of the securities being admitted to listing on a stock exchange and, indiscriminately, upon the members of its board of directors, regardless of whether the board members have been identified as responsible in the abovementioned sense?

---
1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1915

___________ Flora J. Moseley Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Chase Manhattan Mortgage * Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 12, 2007 Filed: March 22, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Plaintiff below claimed that a mort gage lender violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedure Act (RESPA), 12 U.S .C. § 2605(e)(2)(c)(i), by charging her a $5.00 fee for faxing her a payoff statement when she requested it. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to the lender and plaintiff appealed. This case is controlled by Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. , 457 F.3d 781 (8th Cir. 2006), and-2- Curran v. Washington Mut. Bank , 471 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam), where we rejected an identical claim, and we therefore reject the claim here. We decline to address plaintiff's claim th at even if a lender can charge fees in the present circumstances, suchfees must be reasonable, because the claim was raised on appeal for the first time. See Watt , 457 F.3d at 784. Affirmed.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3155 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Wekiva 
River, Seminole Creek, and Rock Springs Run in the State of Florida for 
  study and potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers 
                                system.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Wekiva 
River, Seminole Creek, and Rock Springs Run in the State of Florida for 
  study and potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers 
                                system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) Wekiva River, Florida.--(A) The entire river.
    ``(B) The Seminole Creek tributary.
    ``(C) The Rock Springs Run tributary.''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT.

    Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) The study of the Wekiva River and the tributaries designated 
in paragraph ( ) of subsection (a) shall be completed and the report 
transmitted to Congress not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this paragraph.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Joan Dee Royal LEMOINE v. Joseph Lester LEMOINE.

No. 80-C-2841.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Joan Dee Royal Lemoine, applying for certiorari or writ of review, Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Pointe Coupee. 393 So.2d 251.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker,
the Chief Executive Officer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the Company) and
Derek J. Kerr, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that,
to the best of their knowledge:



|1. |  | The Companys Annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                       

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 27th
day of February, 2004.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ W. Douglas Parker  
| |  |                        
| |  |                        
| |  | W. Douglas Parker      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                        
| |  | /s/ Derek J. Kerr      
| |  |                        
| |  | Derek J. Kerr          
| |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to America West Airlines, Inc. and will be retained by America West
Airlines, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAtmospheric solar absorption measurements in the 9 to 11 mu m region using a diode laser heterodyne spectrometerA tunable diode laser heterodyne radiometer was developed for ground-based measurements of atmospheric solar absorption spectra in the 8 to 12 microns spectral range. The performance and operating characteristics of this Tunable Infrared Heterodyne Radiometer (TIHR) are discussed along with atmospheric solar absorption spectra of HNO3, O3, CO2, and H2O in the 9 to 11 microns spectral region.Document ID19800025490Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHarward, C. N.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hoell, J. M., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1980Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1726L-13877Meeting InformationMeeting: Heterodyne Systems and Technol. Conf.Location: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: March 25, 1980End Date: March 27, 1980Accession Number80N33998Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-61-53-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800025490.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024