alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Outside Directors' Compensation



 Exhibit No. (10)o 
 Outside Directors’ Compensation 
 (Effective January 1, 2009) 
 Each Outside Director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation will receive the following compensation for his or her services as a director, in accordance with the terms of the
Corporation’s Outside Directors’ Compensation Plan (dated as of November 12, 2003) (the “Plan”). The compensation elements listed below supersede or are in lieu of all other cash or stock options currently set out under the
Plan: 
  

	 	•	 	 A cash retainer in the amount of $85,000, payable in quarterly installments in advance. No separate meeting fees will be payable for attending board and committee
meetings. Outside Directors joining the Board during the year will receive the full quarterly amount of the annual retainer for the quarter in which they join the Board and each quarter thereafter. 


  

	 	•	 	 A grant of Restricted Share Units with a value of $140,000 on the grant date, based on the closing price for the Corporation’s common stock on that date (the
“Grant Date Price”). This grant will be made effective as of the first business day of the year. Outside Directors joining the Board during the year will receive a pro-rata grant of Restricted Share Units upon the effective date of their
election to the Board. 


  

	 	•	 	 The Chairman of each of the Audit, Management Development and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees will each receive an additional grant
of Restricted Share Units with a value of $20,000 based on the Grant Date Price. This grant will be made effective as of the first business day of the year. 


  

	 	•	 	 The Lead Director will receive an additional grant of Restricted Share Units with a value of $30,000 based on the Grant Date Price. This grant will be made
effective as of the first business day of the year. 


  

	 	•	 	 The Restricted Period for the Restricted Share Units shall commence on the date of grant and expire on the date each recipient retires from or otherwise terminates
service on the Board. The Restricted Share Units may not be transferred during the Restricted Period.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             NINE MONTHS ENDED                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                FEBRUARY 28,                       FEBRUARY 28,
                                                           1998             1997              1996              1997
                                                           ----             ----              ----              ----
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>               <C>              <C>
Weighted number of shares outstanding:

Primary                                                43,718,335        41,070,724        43,159,238        41,909,399
Fully diluted                                          43,718,335        41,070,724        43,159,238        41,909,399
                                                    
                                                    
Primary:                                            
                                                    
Net loss                                               (14,184,497)      (7,415,917)       (5,249,860)       (4,112,604)
Paid and cumulative undeclared 
Preferred stock dividends                                 (458,663)        (339,566)         (152,888)         (103,741)
Implied dividend equal to intrinsic value of        
preferred stock conversion feature                     (3,884,114)               --        (2,696,904)               --
Net loss applicable to common stock                   (18,527,274)       (7,755,483)       (8,099,652)       (4,216,345)
Net loss per share                                   $      (0.42)      $     (0.19)      $     (0.19)      $     (0.10)
</TABLE>
#### CITY OF STUART, Appellant, v. Carl F. ELLWANGER et al., Appellees. CITY OF STUART, Appellant, v. Carl F. ELLWANGER et al., Appellees.

Nos. 74-112, 74-114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 11, 1974.

Appeals from Circuit Court, Martin County.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Evans *v.*Hastings.

At the expiration of a lease for a definite period, the lessor may bring ejectment: and it is immaterial that he has given a notice to quit in three months.

In error from tbe Common Pleas of Jefferson.

Tbe plaintiff demised land to tbe defendant until the 1st of April, 1846. On that day, plaintiff gave defendant notice to quit in three months, and brought this ejectment on the 27th of August.

McCalmont, P. J., told the jury he could not recover.

*Archers,*for plaintiff in error.

*(xorclen,*contrd.

*Oct.*28.

Coulter, J.

After April, 1846, the defendant below was but a tenant at will: Overdeer *v.*Lewis, 1 *W.*& S. 90; Lesley *v.*Randolph, 4 Rawle, 126. In Bedford *v.*McIlherron, 2 S. & R. 50, it was ruled that when the lease is to expire at a particular time, the lessor may maintain ejectment without a notice to quit. The fact of the lessor having given a notice to quit, on the 1st of April, 1846, is a matter of no consequence whatever. He may have been instructed that the proper remedy did not lie in that direction, or he may have chosen to waive it and proceed by ejectment, which he had an undoubted right to do. The instruction of the court to the jury that the plaintiff could' not recover, was all wrong.

Judgment reversed, and a *venire de novo*awarded.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ken SEAVEY a/k/a Randy Tucker v. Judge Frank A. MARULLO, State of Louisiana.

No. 80-KH-2221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1980.

In re Ken Seavey, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans. No. 268-919.

Granted. Hearing on motion for new trial ordered provided one has not been held.
# C_2006149EN.01001201.xml

| 27.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4214 — Alcatel/Lucent Technologies)

(2006/C 149/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 16 June 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Alcatel (‘Alcatel’, France) and Lucent Technologies (‘Lucent’, USA) enter into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Council Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 16 June 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Alcatel (‘Alcatel’, France) and Lucent Technologies (‘Lucent’, USA) enter into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Council Regulation.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Alcatel: design, development and building of communications networks; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Alcatel: design, development and building of communications networks;

| — | for Lucent: design, delivery and maintenance of a wide range of systems, software and services for communications networks. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Lucent: design, delivery and maintenance of a wide range of systems, software and services for communications networks.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4214 — Alcatel/Lucent Technologies, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4214 — Alcatel/Lucent Technologies, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-63212, 333-13451, 333-26433, 333-42048, 333-42050
and 333-44758) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-62684 and 333-65699) of Allegiant
Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2001.

                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 15, 2002
§ 423.1008 Appointment of representatives. ( a ) An affected party may appoint as its representative anyone not disqualified or suspended from acting as a representative in proceedings before the Secretary or otherwise prohibited by law.
( b ) If the representative appointed is not an attorney, the party must file written notice of the appointment with the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board.
( c ) If the representative appointed is an attorney, the attorney's statement that he or she has the authority to represent the party is sufficient.
§ 423.322 Requirement for disclosure of information. ( a ) *Payment conditional upon provision of information.* Payments to a Part D sponsor are conditioned upon provision of information to CMS that is necessary to carry out this subpart, or as required by law.
( b ) *Restrictions on use of information.* ( 1 ) Officers, employees, and contractors of the Department of Health and Human Services may use the information disclosed or obtained in accordance with the provisions of this subpart for the purposes of, and to the extent necessary— ( i ) In carrying out this subpart, including, but not limited to, determination of payments, and payment-related oversight and program integrity activities.
( ii ) In conducting oversight, evaluation, and enforcement under Title XVIII of the Act.
( 2 ) The United States Attorney General and the Comptroller General of the United States may use the information disclosed or obtained in accordance with the provisions of this subpart for purposes of, and to the extent necessary in, carrying out health oversight activities.
( 3 ) The restrictions described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section do not limit either of the following: ( i ) OIG's authority to fulfill the Inspector General's responsibilities in accordance with applicable Federal law.
( ii ) CMS' ability to use data regarding drug claims in accordance with section 1848(m) of the Act.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 54251, Sept. 18, 2008; 80 FR 7963, Feb. 12, 2015]
# C_2006108EN.01002201.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/22

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 February 2006 — Commission v Trends and Others

(Case T-449/04) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Plea of inadmissibility - Action against a company's shareholders)

(2006/C 108/40)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties:

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia, Agent, and M. Bra, K. Kapoutzidou and S. Chatzigiannis, lawyers).

Applicant:

Defendants: Transport Environment Development Systems (Trends) (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer), Marios Kontaratos (Athens), Anastasios Tillis (Neo Irakleio, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer), Giorgios Argyrakos (Athens), Konstantinos Petrakis (Cholargos, Greece) and Fotini Koutroumpa (Glyfada, Greece).

Defendants:

Application for

An order that the defendants repay the amount of the financial contribution overpaid by the European Community in respect of two contracts concluded in implementation of the Community Programme entitled ‘Telemetric systems in the area of transport’.

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | In so far as it is directed against Messrs Tillis, Kontaratos, Argyrakos and Petrakis and Ms Koutroumpa, the action is dismissed for inadmissibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In so far as it is directed against Messrs Tillis, Kontaratos, Argyrakos and Petrakis and Ms Koutroumpa, the action is dismissed for inadmissibility.

| 2. | The Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Tillis in respect of his plea of inadmissibility. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Tillis in respect of his plea of inadmissibility.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Effect of Compositional Tailoring on the Thermal Expansion and Tribological Properties of PS300: A Solid Lubricant Composite CoatingThis paper describes a research program in which the goal is to alter the thermal expansion coefficient of a composite solid lubricant coating, PS300, by compositional tailoring. PS300 is a plasma sprayed coating consisting of chrome oxide, silver and barium fluoride/calcium fluoride eutectic in NiCr binder. By adjusting the composition, the thermal expansion coefficient can be altered, and hence chosen, to more closely match a selected substrate preventing coating spallation at extreme temperatures. Thermal expansion coefficients (CTE) for a variety of compositions were measured from 25 to 800 C using a commercial dilatometer. The CTE's ranged from 7.0 to 13 x lO(exp -6)/deg C depending on the binder content. Subsequent tribological testing of a modified composition indicated that friction and wear properties were relatively insensitive to compositional tailoring.Document ID19970009488Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsDellaCorte, C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Fellenstein, J. A.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107332NASA-TM-107332E-10423Accession Number97N14974Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009488.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Dewey H. OWEN, Appellant, v. Betty F. WARREN, a/k/a Betty F. Hansgen, Appellee.

No. 72-1052.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
February 06, 2023

# 						Statement from President Joe Biden on the Earthquakes Impacting Turkiye and Syria					

-  Home 
-  					Briefing Room				 
-  					Statements and Releases				 

Jill and I were deeply saddened by the news of the devastating earthquakes that have thus far claimed thousands of lives in Turkiye and Syria. My Administration has been working closely with our NATO Ally Turkiye, and I authorized an immediate U.S. response.  At my direction, senior American officials reached out immediately to their Turkish counterparts to coordinate any and all needed assistance. Our teams are deploying quickly to begin to support Turkish search and rescue efforts and address the needs of those injured and displaced by the earthquake. U.S.-supported humanitarian partners are also responding to the destruction in Syria. Today, our hearts and our deepest condolences are with all those who have lost precious loved ones, those who are injured, and those who saw their homes and businesses destroyed.

###

					Next Post: FACT SHEET: Update on the U.S. Strategy for Addressing the Root Causes of Migration in Central America								FACT SHEET: Update on the U.S. Strategy for Addressing the Root Causes of Migration in Central America			
February 06, 2023•Statements and Releases

					Next					Post

## Stay Connected

We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better.

																		Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden.								

-  Share this page on Facebook 
-  Share this page on X 
-  https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/02/06/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-the-earthquakes-impacting-turkiye-and-syria/?utm_source=link
Page 5(c)
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: September 1, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2016-4268 Peter Hantz Company ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2012S0700041 Respondent



### ORDERFINALIZING LITIGATION SCHEDULE
On April25, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an Initial Procedural Order, requiring, inter 

### alia, the parties to meet and confer regarding a proposed litigation schedule. On July 11, 2016, the parties filed a proposedjoint litigation schedule. OnJuly 26, 2016, the undersignedjudge held a prehearing conference inthis matter in which the parties discussed the proposed schedule. On July 27, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an Order Adopting Litigation Schedule, ordering the parties to adhere to thejointlitigation schedule. , On September 1, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Notice ofHearing, setting the hearing in this case to begin on June 5, 2017.
Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.217(d), 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Complete witness and evidence lists shall be exchanged bythe parties and submitted to the undersignedjudge no later than 

### April6, 2017.
a. Any motion in limine regarding the admissibility ofthe evidence orwitness testimony must be filed no later than 

### April21, 2017. b. Any response to such a motion in limine must be filed no later than 

### May 5, 2017. 2. Anysubpoenarequests must be submitted to the undersignedjudge no laterthan 

### March 7, 2017. 3. Eachparty shall provide the undersignedjudge a CD containing digital copies of premarked versions ofall proposed exhibits no later than

### April 6, 

### 2017.4. The parties may, during the course ofthe hearing, request the opportunity to submit posthearing briefs pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.231(c).

Attachment: Service List DOUGLAS M. RAW ALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST
- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2W1000 1

ONE COPY
Timothy I. McCulloch, Respondent's Counsel HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 750 Phoenix, AZ 85016 TEL: 602-631-4400 FAX: 602-631-4404 Ryan Landers, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2016-4268 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# Dominican Republic

106 items

        -    Report  		Dominican Republic	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Dominican Republic	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (16-1215) – Extradition Treaty	  December 15, 2016 
        -    		U.S. Article 10.20.2 Submission	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		INCLE-CBSI Activities – Summative Evaluation (Summary)	  September 18, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (13-408) – Defense Agreement Regarding the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative	  April 8, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (12-419) – Agreement Concerning the Sharing of Confiscated Proceeds and Instrumentalities of Crimes	  April 19, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (06-825) – Agreement Regarding the Cooperating Nation Information Exchange Program	  August 25, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (06-807.1) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Inter-American Naval Telecommunications Network	  August 7, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Dominican Republic (05-1031) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Their Customs Administrations	  October 31, 2005 

previous page1…891011next page

Back to Top
§ 408.63 Billing procedures when monthly benefits are less than monthly premiums. If monthly benefits are less than monthly premiums, the following procedures apply: ( a ) *Notice of amount due.* At the beginning of SMI entitlement, and at the beginning of each succeeding calendar year, SSA— ( 1 ) Notifies the enrollee of the amount of benefits payable for the rest of the year and the total premiums due for those same months; and
( 2 ) Bills the enrollee for the difference.
( b ) *Notice of amount overdue.* At the beginning of each succeeding calendar year, SSA— ( 1 ) Notifies the enrollee of any amounts overdue for premiums for the preceding calendar year; and
( 2 ) Indicates that if the amount still overdue on April 30 is equal to or greater than the premium for 3 months, SMI coverage will terminate on that date.