alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005330EN.01000402.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-525/03: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - National rules ceasing to have any legal effect before the expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion - Inadmissibility of the action)

(2005/C 330/08)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-525/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: X. Lewis, C. Loggi and K. Wiedner) v Italian Republic (Agent: I. M. Braguglia and G. Fiengo, lawyer) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 16 December 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C. W. A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur), C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen and J. Klučka, Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Italian Republic

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 06.03.2004

1

---
Letter Agreement, between the Company and Charles A. Portwood



 Exhibit 10.71 
 December 19, 2008 
 Mr. Charles A. Portwood 
 Executive Vice President 
 TO&PS Operational Excellence 
 Wyeth 
 500 Arcola Road 
 Collegeville, PA 19426 
 Dear Charlie: 
 We are
pleased to confirm your new position with Wyeth as Executive Vice President, TO&PS Operational Excellence, effective November 20, 2008. We would also like to take this opportunity to confirm that you are still entitled to severance of two
years’ base salary in the event that your employment is terminated by Wyeth for reasons other than gross misconduct, theft, or conviction of a felony, as set forth in your offer letter dated October 5, 2001, subject to the changes set forth
below (any severance to be paid in connection with a change of control shall be governed by the Change of Control Agreement entered into by and between you and Wyeth). 
 In the event that your employment is terminated by Wyeth for reasons other than gross misconduct, theft, or conviction of a felony then, in exchange for executing a general release of all claims (in substantially the
form prescribed by the Company) within forty-five days following your separation from service from Wyeth and not revoking such release, you will be eligible for severance equal to two years’ base salary. The severance will be paid to you in
twenty-four equal monthly installments commencing on the first regularly scheduled payroll date of the third full month following the month in which you separated from service (e.g., if you terminate on September 15, payments will begin with the
first payroll date in December). However, if you are a “Specified Employee” (as determined by the Company in accordance with Treasury Regulation 1.409A-1(i)), no severance payments will be made until the first regularly scheduled payroll
date of the seventh month following your separation from service and on such payroll date you will receive a payment equal to 7/24ths of your severance. The balance of your severance will be paid in equal portions monthly thereafter. 
 Please indicate your agreement with the above terms by signing and dating this letter in the space provided below, and returning this document to me by no later than 5
p.m. EST on December 31, 2008. 
 Sincerely, 
  
 /s/ Denise M.
Peppard                                        
          
 Denise M. Peppard 
 Senior Vice President 
 Human Resources 
  
  

			
	Accepted: /s/ Charles A.
Portwood                            	 	Date: December 22,
2008                                        


 Charles A. Portwood
- Expo Unit Home
- About Us
- Expositions
- Hosting the World’s Fair
- Past U.S. Pavilions
- External Links

HomeExpo Unit...Expositions

# 									Expositions							

## Expo 2025 Osaka

Designing Future Society for Our Lives 

The six-month long Expo 2025 Osaka marks the return of the World Expo to Japan 20 years after the Aichi Expo 2005 and is expected to attract over 28 million visitors. The event is scheduled for April 13, 2025 to October 13, 2025, 55 years after Japan and Asia’s first ever World Expo, the Osaka Expo 1970. This will be the third time Osaka hosts a World Expo and the sixth time Japan hosts a World Expo.

The theme of Expo 2025 Osaka is Designing Future Society for Our lives. The Expo’s subthemes are Saving Lives, Empowering Lives, and Connecting Lives. The theme and design of the U.S. Pavilion for the Expo has not yet been announced.

More information about U.S. participation in Expo 2025 and how you can get involved coming soon.

## Expo 2027 Belgrade

Let Humans Play for Humanity 

Tags

Expo UnitPublic DiplomacyUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

Back to Top
#### § 423.2440 Credibility adjustment.

(a) A Part D sponsor may add the credibility adjustment specified under [paragraph (e)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2440#p-423.2440(e)) of this section to a contract's MLR if the contract's experience is partially credible, as defined in [paragraph (d)(1)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2440#p-423.2440(d)(1)) of this section.

(b) A Part D sponsor may not add a credibility adjustment to a contract's MLR if the contract's experience is fully credible, as defined in [paragraph (d)(2)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2440#p-423.2440(d)(2)) of this section.

(c) For those contract years for which a contract has non-credible experience, as defined in [paragraph (d)(3)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2440#p-423.2440(d)(3)) of this section, sanctions under [§ 423.2410(b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2410#p-423.2410(b)) through [(d)](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2410#p-423.2410(d)) will not apply.

(d)

(1) A contract's experience is partially credible if it is based on the experience of at least 4,800 member months and fewer than or equal to 360,000 member months.

(2) A contract's experience is fully credible if it is based on the experience of more than 360,000 member months.

(3) A contract's experience is non-credible if it is based on the experience of fewer than 4,800 member months.

(e) The credibility adjustment for partially credible experience is determined based on the number of member months for all enrollees under the contract and the factors shown in Table 1 of this section. When the number of member months used to determine credibility exactly matches a member month category listed in Table 1 of this section, the value associated with that number of member months is the credibility adjustment. The credibility adjustment for a number of member months between the values shown in Table 1 of this section is determined by linear interpolation.

Table 1 to [§ 423.2440](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-423.2440)—Credibility Adjustments for Part D Contracts

| Member months | Credibility adjustment (additional percentage points) |
| --- | --- |
| <4,800 | N/A (Non-credible). |
| 4,800 | 8.4%. |
| 12,000 | 5.3%. |
| 24,000 | 3.7%. |
| 48,000 | 2.6%. |
| 120,000 | 1.7%. |
| 240,000 | 1.2%. |
| 360,000 | 1.0%. |
| >360,000 | 0.0% (Fully credible). |

[[85 FR 33911](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-33911), June 2, 2020]
<PAGE>


Exhibit 21.  SUBSIDIARIES OF SCHERER HEALTHCARE, INC.
<TABLE>
<S>      <C>                                                           <C>
1.       Medical Waste Systems, Inc.                                   Subsidiary
         DBA Bio Systems                                               I.D.#22-2853378
         380 Constance Drive
         Warminster, Pennsylvania 18974
         (770) 933-1800

2.       ASH Enterprises, Inc.                                         Subsidiary
         120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305                 I.D.# 58-1728029
         Atlanta, Georgia 30339
         (770) 933-1800

3.       Bio Systems Partners                                          Wholly Owned Partnership
         DBA Bio Systems                                               I.D.# 58-1822608
         210 Sherwood Avenue
         Farmingdale, New York 11735
         (770) 933-1800

4.       Biofor, Inc.                                                  Subsidiary
         120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305                 I.D.# 58-2105818
         Atlanta, Georgia 30339
         (770) 933-1800

5.       BioWaste Management Corp.                                     Subsidiary
         120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305                 I.D.# 11-2872389
         Atlanta, Georgia 30339
         (770) 933-1800

6.       BioWaste Systems, Inc.                                        Subsidiary
         210 Sherwood Avenue                                           I.D.# 58-1803613
         Farmingdale, New York 11735
         (770) 933-1800

7.       Scherer Laboratories, Inc.                                    Subsidiary
         120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305                 I.D.# 75-0270890
         Atlanta, Georgia 30339
         (770) 933-1800
</TABLE>

                                            -43-
Order entered March 1, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00194-CR

EDWARD LAMAR PORTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-00712-T

ORDER

On February 26, 2021, State’s exhibit 28, the DVD of appellant’s interview 

with police, was filed. In light of this, we VACATE our February 24, 2021 order 

to the extent it orders court reporter Vearneas Faggett not to sit as a court reporter.

We GRANT appellant’s February 22, 2021 motion and ORDER appellant’s 

brief due by March 26, 2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lela 

Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Vearneas Faggett, official
court reporter, 283rd Judicial District Court; to the Dallas County Auditor’s Office;

and counsel for all parties.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866) on Form S-8 of Alfacell Corporation
of our report dated November 4, 2002, with respect to the statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and cash flows of Alfacell
Corporation for the year ended July 31, 2002, and the period from August 24,
1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, which report appears in the July
31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Alfacell Corporation. Our report dated
November 4, 2002, as it relates to the financial statements for the period from
August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, is based on the report of
other auditors who have ceased operations as to the amounts included therein for
the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.

Our report dated November 4, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working
capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

                                                    Short Hills, New Jersey
                                                    October 12, 2004
#### Ex parte Horace Lee GRAHAM. (Re Horace Lee Graham v. State of Alabama).

79-527.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1980.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
AAM-11-392-E 

July 27, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10323 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0764 

Mr. Daniel Perry 

Owner 

SkyPark Helicopters, LLC 

1608 West 2225 South 

Woods Cross, UT 84087 

Dear Mr. Perry: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 13, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of SkyPark Helicopters, LLC (SkyPark) for an exemption from part 120 to allow 

SkyPark, which is operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR), to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SkyPark. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant SkyPark Helicopters, LLC an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow SkyPark, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of SkyPark are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the SkyPark part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management
Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2002
§ 423.1090 Basis, timing, and authority for reopening an Administrative Law Judge or Board decision. ( a ) *Basis and timing for reopening.* An ALJ of Departmental Appeals Board decision may be reopened, within 60 calendar days from the date of the notice of decision, upon the motion of the ALJ or the Board or upon the petition of either party to the hearing.
( b ) *Authority to reopen.* ( 1 ) A decision of the Departmental Appeals Board may be reopened only by the Departmental Appeals Board.
( 2 ) A decision of an ALJ may be reopened by that ALJ, by another ALJ if that one is not available, or by the Departmental Appeals Board. For purposes of this paragraph, an ALJ is considered to be unavailable if the ALJ has died, terminated employment, or been transferred to another duty station, is on leave of absence, or is unable to conduct a hearing because of illness.
§ 412.82 Payment for extended length-of-stay cases (day outliers). ( a ) For discharges occurring before October 1, 1997, if the hospital stay reflected by a discharge includes covered days of care beyond the applicable threshold criterion, the intermediary will make an additional payment, on a per diem basis, to the discharging hospital for those days. A special request or submission by the hospital is not necessary to initiate this payment. However, a hospital may request payment for day outliers before the medical review required in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The QIO must review and approve to the extent required by CMS— ( 1 ) The medical necessity and appropriateness of the admission and outlier services in the context of the entire stay;
( 2 ) The validity of the diagnostic and procedural coding; and
( 3 ) The granting of grace days.
( c ) Except as provided in § 412.83, the per diem payment made under paragraph (a) of this section is derived by taking a percentage of the average per diem payment for the applicable DRG, as calculated by dividing the Federal prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs and inpatient capital-related costs determined under subpart D of this part, by the arithmetic mean length of stay for that DRG. CMS issues the applicable percentage of the average per diem payment in the annual publication of the prospective payment rates in accordance with § 412.8(b).
( d ) Any days in a covered stay identified as noncovered reduce the number of days reimbursed at the day outlier rate but not to exceed the number of days that occur after the day outlier threshold.
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 15326, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 35689, Sept. 3, 1985; 53 FR 38529, Sept. 30, 1988; 57 FR 39822, Sept. 1, 1992; 59 FR 45398, Sept. 1, 1994; 62 FR 46028, Aug. 29, 1997; 85 FR 59020, Sept. 18, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3186 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 237
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3186

                          [Report No. 104-609]

   To designate the Federal building located at 1655 Woodson Road in 
    Overland, Missouri, as the ``Sammy L. Davis Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1996

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                              June 6, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 1655 Woodson Road in 
    Overland, Missouri, as the ``Sammy L. Davis Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1655 Woodson Road in Overland, 
Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ``Sammy L. Davis Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sammy L. Davis 
Federal Building''.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 237

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3186

                          [Report No. 104-609]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the Federal building located at 1655 Woodson Road in 
    Overland, Missouri, as the ``Sammy L. Davis Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 6, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Dominion Oklahoma Texas 

Exploration & Production, 

Inc. and Exploration & 

Production Texas, LLC 

(Appellees/CrossAppellants)Appellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 19, 2014

No. 04-14-00170-CV

ANDERSON ENERGY CORPORATION and Ellersly, Inc.,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees

v.

Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc. and Highmount Exploration & 

Production Texas, LLC,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants

From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0005419

Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Second Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to July 29, 2014. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court