alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
use of our report dated April 18, 1997, on the financial
statements VICORP Restaurants,Inc. Employees' Profit Sharing
Plan, which is incorporated by reference in VICORP
Restaurants, Inc.'s Form 10-K/A amendment dated April 28,
1997, to its Form 10-K report for the year ended October 31,
1996.  It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. subsequent
to October 31, 1996, or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.

         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Denver, Colorado
April 18, 1997
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.560 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* ( 1 ) Section 1852(f) of the Act provides that an MA organization must establish meaningful grievance procedures.
( 2 ) Section 1852(g) of the Act establishes requirements that an MA organization must meet concerning organization determinations and appeals.
( 3 ) Section 1869 of the Act specifies the amount in controversy needed to pursue a hearing and judicial review and authorizes representatives to act on behalf of individuals that seek appeals. These provisions are incorporated for MA appeals by section 1852(g)(5) of the Act and part 405 of this chapter.
( 4 ) Section 1859(f)(8) of the Act provides for, to the extent feasible, unifying grievances and appeals procedures under sections 1852(f), 1852(g), 1902(a)(3), 1902(a)(5), and 1932(b)(4) of the Act for Medicare and Medicaid covered items and services provided by specialized MA plans for special needs individuals described in subsection 1859(b)(6)(B)(ii) of the Act for individuals who are eligible under titles XVIII and XIX of the Act. Beginning January 1, 2021, procedures established under section 1859(f)(8) of the Act apply in place of otherwise applicable grievances and appeals procedures with respect to Medicare and Medicaid covered items and services provided by applicable integrated plans.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth— ( 1 ) Requirements for MA organizations with respect to grievance procedures, organization determinations, and appeal procedures.
( 2 ) The rights of MA enrollees with respect to organization determinations, and grievance and appeal procedures.
( 3 ) The rules concerning notice of noncoverage of inpatient hospital care.
( 4 ) The rules that apply when an MA enrollee requests immediate QIO review of a determination that he or she no longer needs inpatient hospital care.
( 5 ) Requirements for applicable integrated plans with respect to procedures for integrated grievances, integrated organization determinations, and integrated reconsiderations.
( c ) *Relation to ERISA requirements.* Consistent with section 1857(i)(2) of the Act, provisions of this subpart may, to the extent applicable under regulations adopted by the Secretary of Labor, apply to claims for benefits under group health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
[63 FR 35107, June 26, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 4738, Jan. 28, 2005; 84 FR 15833, Apr. 16, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3204 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3204

   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
  States Code, to select board certified physicians to provide second 
                               opinions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1996

  Mr. Bilbray (for himself and Ms. Dunn of Washington) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
  States Code, to select board certified physicians to provide second 
                               opinions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHYSICIANS PROVIDING SECOND OPINIONS.

    The administrative agency to which the Secretary of Labor has 
delegated the authority to adjudicate claims made under the workers' 
compensation provisions of title 5, United States Code, shall only 
select physicians who have been certified by a board of medical 
specialties to provide second opinions in connection with such claims.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006084EN.01000101.xml

| 7.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 April 2006

(2006/C 84/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2312 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4631 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70055 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5793 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,550 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9716 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5162 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,480 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6489 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6799 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4225 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5529 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9998 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9746 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 172,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4308 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8617 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3280 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 086,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,515 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,902 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,8580 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,976 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2312

JPY

Japanese yen

144,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4631

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70055

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3220

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5793

ISK

Iceland króna

89,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

28,550

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9716

RON

Romanian leu

3,5162

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,480

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6489

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6799

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4225

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5529

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9998

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9746

KRW

South Korean won

1 172,10

ZAR

South African rand

7,4308

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8617

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3280

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 086,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,515

PHP

Philippine peso

62,902

RUB

Russian rouble

33,8580

THB

Thai baht

46,976

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Amendment No. 1 to Health Net, Inc. Management Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.45 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 HEALTH NET, INC. 
 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Health Net, Inc. Management Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of key employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify that awards made under the Plan are
intended satisfy the short-term deferral exemption in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4); and 
 WHEREAS,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has the power to amend the Plan pursuant to Article IX thereof. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Article IX of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	By striking the Section V(e) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 

 “(e) Payment of Incentive Awards. 
 Incentive Awards shall be payable to Participants no later than March 15th following the Plan Year in which an Incentive Award is
earned. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit a Participant to defer the receipt of an Incentive Award under a deferred compensation plan or plans of the Company, as may be in effect from time to time, in accordance with
rules and procedures established by the Senior Vice President Organization Effectiveness, and in a manner that satisfies the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Health Net, Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed on this 12th day of
November, 2008. 
  

			
	HEALTH NET, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Karin Mayhew

	Name:	 	Karin Mayhew
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, Organization Effectiveness
# C_2006121EN.01001001.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/10

---

Appeal brought on 31 March 2006 by T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve dis Ticaret A.S. against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 January 2006 in Case T-147/03: Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve Ticaret AS

(Case C-171/06 P)

(2006/C 121/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve dis Ticaret A.S. (represented by: M. Francetti and F. Jacobacci, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | reverse the judgment issued on 12 January 2006 by the Court of First Instance in Case T-147/03, because it breaches article 8(1)(b) of EC Regulation No 40/94 (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

reverse the judgment issued on 12 January 2006 by the Court of First Instance in Case T-147/03, because it breaches article 8(1)(b) of EC Regulation No 40/94 (1);

1

| — | admit the conclusions submitted by T.I.M.E during the first-level judgment in its brief dated 28 October 2003. |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the conclusions submitted by T.I.M.E during the first-level judgment in its brief dated 28 October 2003.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the judgment of the Court of First Instance should be set aside on the grounds that the Court infringed and misapplied article 8(1)(b) of EC Regulation No 40/94 by:

| — | Failing to take account of the distinctive strength of the earlier trademark (‘QUANTIEME’), an essential element that must be taken into account when assessing likelihood of confusion; |
| --- | --- |

—

Failing to take account of the distinctive strength of the earlier trademark (‘QUANTIEME’), an essential element that must be taken into account when assessing likelihood of confusion;

| — | Concluding that, in spite of the conceptual distance between the two marks, there is still a risk of confusion in view of their phonetic and visual similarities. |
| --- | --- |

—

Concluding that, in spite of the conceptual distance between the two marks, there is still a risk of confusion in view of their phonetic and visual similarities.

---

(1)  JO L 011, p.1

1

---
Exhibit 99.1
                                                          ------------

                           CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company")
for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Andrew L. Simon, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and a director, of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that

        (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 17, 2003



                                     /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON

                                     President, Chief Executive Officer
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                            9882
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           10327
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  9230
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      18220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             605
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               607
<LOANS>                                         177562
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  235365
<DEPOSITS>                                      201042
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2209
<LONG-TERM>                                       3225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20994
<OTHER-SE>                                        7895
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  235365
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4786
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  295
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   241
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  5322
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2112
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3210
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      153
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (25)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1465
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1465
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       989
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.05
<LOANS-NON>                                       1808
<LOANS-PAST>                                       629
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2034
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       25
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2206
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2206
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Carlton SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52376.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 11, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Edwin H. Roberts, Jr., Roberts & Clisby, T. H. Freeland, III, Freeland & Gafford, Oxford, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Carolyn B. Mills, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Bobby Williams, Asst. Dist. Atty., Hernando, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Panola County; Andrew C. Baker, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

MORONGO CASINO COGENERATION FACILITY

PROPOSED PART 71 TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT RENEWAL

RECORD OF INDEX

– September 2016

INDEX # RECORD SECTION OR ITEM DATE OF ITEM

Proposed Draft Permit

1.1 Proposed Draft Permit (MO

- ROP 15

- 01) July 29, 2016

Public Notice and Supporting Documents

1.2 Public Notice July 29, 2016

1.3 Summary Sheet July 29, 2016

1.4 Statement of Basis (SOB) July 29, 2016

Part 71 Title V Permit Applications

1.5 Morongo Part 71 Renewal Application MAR 2015 March 20, 2015

1.6 Application Clarification and PTE Calculation March 7, 2016

Final Permit

2.1 Final Permit (MO

- ROP 15

- 01) September 29, 2016

Public Comments and Supporting Documents

2.2 Proof of Publication July 29, 2016

2.3 Comment from Morongo Band of Mission Indians August 29, 2016

2.4 Comment from South Coast Air Quality Management District July 29, 2016

2.5 EPA’s Response to Comments September, 2016

2.6 Final Statement of Basis (SOB) September, 2016
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerothermal analysis of a wing-elevon cove with variable leakageA mathematical model of the heating associated with leakage within the space shuttle orbiter wing elevon cove was used to analyze the aerothermal response of the structure. The analysis was applied to wind tunnel results and to shuttle entry conditions. A parametric study described the mechanism by which the energy of the ingested mass is distributed as a function of the Reynolds number, wall conductivity, surface emissivity, and cove height and length. The rate at which energy was transferred into the cove interior was primarily determined by the combined effects of the convection, wall capacitance, and internal radiation terms. Correlation with wind tunnel results indicated that the cold wall convective heating rates, wall temperature, and gas temperature of the cove were predicted by the analytical model for short exposure times. Predicted transient thermal response of the elevon cove subjected to shuttle entry conditions indicated that the allowable leak area at the cove seal was 20 percent less than that previously indicated by experiment.Document ID19800024184Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHunt, R. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1980Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberL-13751NASA-TP-1703Accession Number80N32692Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-73-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800024184.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### U.S. Election Assistance Commission

      ( print page 5826)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Gracia Hm Hillman,

 Vice Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-2192 Filed 1-28-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### EVANS V. THE STATE.

(Decided April 13, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. William E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for tbe State.

Pelham, J.

There is no error in the record, and no bill of exceptions. Affirmed.