alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3249 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3249

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to 
develop domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of minerals 
            from the Nation's seabed, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 2(a) of the Mining 
and Mineral Resources Research Institute Act of 1984 (30 U.S.C. 
1222(a)) is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
``There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not more than 
$1,800,000 for each of the fiscal years after fiscal year 1996 to be 
made available by the Secretary to an institute or institutes 
experienced in investigating the continental shelf regions of the 
United States, the deep seabed and near shore environments of islands, 
and the Arctic and cold water regions as a source for nonfuel minerals. 
Such funds are to be used by the institute or institutes to assist in 
developing domestic technological capabilities required for the 
location of, and the efficient and environmentally sound recovery of, 
minerals (other than oil and gas) from the Nation's shallow and deep 
seabed.''.
    (b) Short Title.--Section 11 of such Act (30 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 11. SHORT TITLE.

    ``This Act may be cited as the `Mining and Mineral Resources 
Institutes Act'.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10003

(2005/C 218 A/01)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for the Institute for Health and Consumer Protection of the Directorate-General Joint Research Centre in Ispra (Italy).

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

To be eligible candidates must: - be a citizen of a European Union Member State; - hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies; - have at least 15 years' postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission, including at least five years at a high management level; - have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

and follow the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration.

The closing date for registration is 6 October 2005. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

----
rdvt-ex1018_17.htm



Exhibit 10.18

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is made as of November 9, 2020 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Red Violet, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Jeffrey Dell (the "Executive"). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (defined below).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement made by and between the Company and Executive, dated April 9, 2019 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

 

WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby adopt this Amendment effective as of the First Amendment Effective Date and agree as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Paragraph 6 to Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement ("Exhibit A") is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:




 

6. Term: Commencing on the Effective Date and ending March 26, 2024 (the “Term Expiration Date”); provided, that, upon the Term Expiration Date this Agreement shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms, unless either party provides written notice to the other no less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the commencement of each such renewal term setting forth a desire to terminate this Agreement at the expiration of the then current term. Termination of this Agreement will not affect the rights or obligations of the parties hereunder arising out of, or relating to, circumstances occurring prior to the expiration of this Agreement, which rights and obligations will survive the termination of this Agreement and the termination of the Executive’s employment with the Company.


	
 
	
2.
	
Except as expressly amended herein, all terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




 

[Signature Page Follows]






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

COMPANY:

 

Red Violet, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

By: /s/ Derek Dubner

       Derek Dubner, CEO

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

/s/ Jeffrey Dell

Jeffrey Dell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Signature Page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement]
'ATION 

SERVED JULY 14,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

COMLUX AVIATION SERVICES LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0003 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-0317 

AMENDED PREHEARING 

ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES 

The undersigned has been assigned the above captioned case. 

We do not anticipate setting this matter for hearing prior to 1 October 2010. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to conclude all 

discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories on or before October 15, 2010. If the parties 

cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a timely manner on or before October 15, 2010. In all other respects. Judge 

Benkin's Order of May 17, 2010, remains in effect. 

iiurJ 

Lichard C. Good^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^BO 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mark A. Nelson, Vice President 

Comlux Aviation Services, LLC, Respondent 

Formerly, Comlux Completion USA 

2640 S. Cargo Drive 

Indianapolis, IN 46241 

TEL: 317-472-7370 

FAX: 317-472-7389 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S .E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Leaders and Financial Facilitators of ISIS and al-Qa’ida Cells in Maldives

# 									Designating Leaders and Financial Facilitators of ISIS and al-Qa’ida Cells in Maldives							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

July 31, 2023

Today, the United States is designating Maldivian supporters of ISIS and al-Qa’ida, including 18 ISIS and ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K) facilitators and two al-Qa’ida operatives, along with 29 associated companies.

The individuals designated today include leaders and members of Maldives-based terrorist cells and an affiliated criminal gang, in addition to individuals and a company associated with key ISIS-K recruiter Mohamad Ameen who was designated by the United States in 2019. Several of the designated individuals have also planned or carried out attacks that targeted journalists and local authorities.

The United States will continue to deter and disrupt financial and other support for terrorist attacks in Maldives. We are also committed to denying funding and resources to these terrorist support networks and countering the local and international threats they pose.

*These actions are being taken pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended, which targets terrorist groups and their supporters. For more information on today’s designations, see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsMaldivesOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsTerrorist Designation

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Melvin BOWMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 80-KH-2317.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Melvin Bowman, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 275-631.

Denied. Relator must apply first to trial court.
# C_2006131EN.01001301.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 March 2006 — Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Zirh International Corp.

(Case C-206/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Word mark ZIRH - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community trade mark SIR)

(2006/C 131/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: T. Schulte-Beckhausen and C. Musiol, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and A. von Mühlendahl, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener: Zirh International Corp., (represented by L. Kouker)

Intervener

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 3 March 2004 in Case T-355/02 Mülhens v OHIM, by which it dismissed an action for annulment of the rejection of the opposition by the proprietor of an earlier mark to the registration of a trade mark — Similarity of the marks — Art. 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 10.07.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris                                                          
|Nicholas Konidaris President and Chief Executive
Officer Dated: November 7, 2007

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21
                                
                Subsidiaries of EnergyNorth, Inc.
                                

EnergyNorth, Inc., incorporated in the state of New Hampshire,
has 100% ownership of the common stock of the following:


Broken Bridge Corporation, 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Propane, Inc., 75 Regional Drive, Concord, New Hampshire.

ENI Mechanicals, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Realty, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

ENI Resources, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.



_______________
All of the above companies are incorporated in the state of New Hampshire.
• 

:111' .77=a,:f 7.74. 1,17.5 7gA,tirzAtiz 

as attorney's fees and costs"), this appeal is premature and we therefore 

lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Douglas 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge 

David M. Frostick 

Clark County Public Defender 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

filE211214kfMts -
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         725813
<NAME>                        CHEMFAB CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                Dec-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Mar-26-2000
<CASH>                                          7,092,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,177,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      831,000
<INVENTORY>                                    25,899,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,386,000
<PP&E>                                         64,889,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 31,568,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                147,472,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,414,000
<BONDS>                                                $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  $0
<PREFERRED>                                            $0
<COMMON>                                          888,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     77,920,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  147,472,000
<SALES>                                        91,089,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               91,089,000
<CGS>                                          59,255,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  59,255,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,079,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                836,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,919,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,976,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,943,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        $0
<CHANGES>                                              $0
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,943,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .90



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.138 Prior authorization. ( a ) *Requirement.* When a coordinated care plan, as specified in § 422.4(a)(iii) (including MSA network plans), uses prior authorization processes in connection with basic benefits or supplemental benefits, the MA organization must comply with the requirements in this section. (MA PFFS are not permitted to use prior authorization policies or “prior notification” policies that reduce cost sharing for enrollees based on whether the enrollee or provider notifies the PFFS plan in advance that services will be furnished). Prior authorization processes include all policies and procedures used in prior authorization unless otherwise noted.
( b ) *Application.* Prior authorization processes for coordinated care plans may only be used for one or more the following purposes: ( 1 ) To confirm the presence of diagnoses or other medical criteria that are the basis for coverage determinations for the specific item or service; or
( 2 ) For basic benefits, to ensure an item or service is medically necessary based on standards specified in § 422.101(c)(1), or
( 3 ) For supplemental benefits, to ensure that the furnishing of a service or benefit is clinically appropriate.
( c ) *Effect of prior authorization or pre-service approval.* If the MA organization approved the furnishing of a covered item or service through a prior authorization or pre-service determination of coverage or payment, it may not deny coverage later on the basis of lack of medical necessity and may not reopen such a decision for any reason except for good cause (as provided at § 405.986 of this chapter) or if there is reliable evidence of fraud or similar fault per the reopening provisions at § 422.616. The definitions of the terms “reliable evidence” and “similar fault” in § 405.902 of this chapter apply to this provision.
[88 FR 22331, Apr. 12, 2023]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The update**
 
2013 Jan-Mar | 2014: Mar-AprAug-Sep | 2016 Fall | 2017: JanMay| 2019 Jul-Aug
 
SuDoc Number:A 57.81/33:
Item Number:0120-C-33 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000990215
 
July 3, 2019
HomeThailand

# Thailand

168 items

        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Thailand National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 5, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Thailand	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Russo Travels to Belgium, Brunei, Thailand, and Laos	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Bangkok, Thailand: International School Bangkok: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons Announces Five New Recipients of 2023 Program to End Modern Slavery Awards	  September 29, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with David M. Turk, U.S. Department of Energy	  August 24, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Selection of Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 23, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 17, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 17, 2023 

previous page1234…17next page

Back to Top
### / I 

### {\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MELVIN JONES, Plaintiff,


### v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner ofSocial Security, et a!., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

------------------------------ 

### ) MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN 1 12012

.. clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy ,,ourts for the District of Columbia


# 12 0946

This matter is before the Court onplaintiff's application to proceed informapauperis and hispro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffpurports to convert the "wrongful denial" ofhis claim for Social Security benefits into a civil rights claim arising from the defendants' "Failureto Provide Equal Excess [sic] to public benefits and equal protection under the law." Compl. at 1. In order to bring a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, "[t]here is a requirement of state action on the part ofthe alleged wrongdoer in order for liability to attach." Chandler v. WE. Welch & Assocs., Inc., 533 F. Supp. 2d 94, 103 (D.D.C. 2008) (citation omitted). Plaintiff does not allege that defendants were acting "under color ofany statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, ofany State or Territory orthe District ofColumbia." 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Nor does plaintiffallege any constitutionally-protected right he has in the granting ofan application for benefits. As plaintiffseeks to bring a § 1983 claim against the defendants based onan alleged violation ofhis constitutional rights, the claim must be dismissed.An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

United States DistrictJudge