alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Water Quality Standards Regulatory

Clarifications Proposed Rule:

Webinar Access Instructions

Thank	you	for	registering	for	th e	Tribal	consultation	webinar	o n	EPA’s	Water	Quality Standards	Regulatory	Clarificati ons	Proposed	Rule.	The	webinar is	schedule	for November
19, 1:00–3:00 pm (Eastern) .	The	first	part	of	the	webinar	will	provide	Tribes	an opportunity	to	ask	questions	and	learn	more	about	the	proposed revisions	to	WQS rulemaking.		The	second	part	wi ll	be	reserved	for	consultation comments	from	Tribal leaders	or	their	consultation	designees.

Below,	please	find	information	o n	how	to	access	the	webinar,	as well	as	several	important

notes.	Printable	instructions	are	also	attached.

HOW TO ACCESS THE WEBINAR

There	are	two	ways	to	access	the	webinar.	If	your	computer	syst em	has	speakers,	please use	Option	1:

Option 1—If your computer system has speakers:

1. Access	the	audio	and	video	portions	of	the	presentations	at: https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruletribes/

a. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	yo ur	first	and	last	name.

b. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	p resentation.	On	the	right	side of	the	screen, you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.

2. You	do	not	need	to	dial‐in	using your	phone.	Once	EPA	begins	th e	webinar,	you	will be	able	to	hear	the	presentation	through	your	computer’s	speake rs.

a. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log‐in	to	t he	system before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.
3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	you r	clarifying	questions	in	the	“ chat”	window.	EPA will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	b e	able	to	respond	to every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.

Option 2—If your computer does not have speakers:

a. To	access	the	presentation,	go	to: https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruletribes/
b. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	yo ur	first	and	last	name.

c. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	p resentation.	On	the	right	side of	the	screen, you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.

2. To	access	the	audio	portion,	dial	in	to	the	conference	line	thr ough	your	phone:a. Conference	Number:		1‐866‐299‐3188
b. Participant	Co de:	2025661149

c. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	t he	system before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.
3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	you r	clarifying	questions	in	the	“ chat”	window.	EPA will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	b e	able	to	respond	to every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.

OTHER NOTES

 Please do not share the url or phone number so that EPA can be sure that
individuals who have pre ‐ registered are able to access the webinar.

 Test	your	system	prior	to	the	dat e	of	the	webinar	to	ensure	tha t	you	are	able	to connect.	To	test	your	system,	go	to: https://epa.connectsolutions.co m/common/help/en/support/meeting _test.htm

 The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	t he	system	before	that time,	you	will	hear	silence.

 Please	use	your	computer	speakers	to	hear	the	presentation,	if possible	(option	1 above).

o If	you	use	both	computer	speaker s	and	dial	in	to	the	phone	call ‐in	number, you	will	hear	feedback.
# C_2006143EN.01003301.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/33

---

Action brought on 13 April 2006 — DeTeMedien v OHIM (suchen.de)

(Case T-117/06)

(2006/C 143/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DeTeMedien, Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany) (represented by: J. Fesenmair and I. Gehring, lawyers)

Applicant: DeTeMedien

Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 30 January 2006 in appeal proceedings R 287/2005-1, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 30 January 2006 in appeal proceedings R 287/2005-1, and

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation to bear the applicant's refundable costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation to bear the applicant's refundable costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘suchen.de’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 (Application No 3 915 329)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Partial rejection of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: The mark applied for does have distinctive character and is not purely descriptive; thus, no absolute grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) or Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) stand in the way of its registration.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                    FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                                                5,153
<SECURITIES>                                                          5,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        22,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          1,048
<INVENTORY>                                                          27,858
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     63,428
<PP&E>                                                               46,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       25,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       94,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                17,641
<BONDS>                                                                 558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                              1,010
<OTHER-SE>                                                           73,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         94,802
<SALES>                                                              78,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     78,791
<CGS>                                                                45,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        45,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     27,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       5,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          1,989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   3,957
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          3,957
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           .38
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7047

JOSEPH DORSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA99-299-CCB)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Lawrence Gitomer, THE LAW OFFICE OF MARK GITOMER, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Dorsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially

on the reasoning of the district court. See Goins v. Angelone, 226

F.3d 312, 320 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-20]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM. (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-20 with attached transmittal, policy justification, sensitivity of technology.

Dated: August 26, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 45828)          ( print page 45829)          ( print page 45830)          ( print page 45831)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E9-21357 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### In re Jimmy Darrell OWENS v. STATE. Ex parte Jimmy Darrell Owens.

SC 994.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 24, 1974.

Ian F. Gaston and J. D. Quinlivan, Jr., Mobile, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

MADDOX, Justice.

Petition of Jimmy Darrell Owens for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Owens v. State, 53 Ala.App. 553, 302 So.2d 240.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, HAR-WOOD and FAULKNER, JJ., concur.
#### Linda GORDON, Appellant, v. ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL, INC., a Florida corporation, and General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-294.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3273

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require corporations

to obtain the views of shareholders concerning corporate charitable

contributions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1996

Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require

corporations to obtain the views of shareholders concerning corporate charitable contributions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.

4 Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

5 (15 U.S.C. 78n) is amended by adding at the end thereof

6 the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(i) APPROVAL OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.—

8 Each issuer of a security registered pursuant to section

9 12 of this title, or a security issued by an investment com-
2

•HR 3273 IH

1 pany registered under the Investment Company Act of

2 1940, shall afford to its shareholders the opportunity, on

3 a basis proportional to the number of shares owned or con4 trolled by such shareholder, to participate through a

5 proxy, consent, or authorization in the designation of re6 cipients of the issuer’s charitable contributions. This sub7 section shall not be construed to limit or otherwise affect

8 the authority of the management of such an issuer to des9 ignate additional recipients of such contributions.’’.

Æ
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Davis Ba, Jessica – Republic of Côte d’Ivoire -June-2022

# 									Davis Ba, Jessica – Republic of Côte d’Ivoire -June-2022							

Certificate of Competency

June 27, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:Republic of Côte d’Ivoire

CANDIDATE:Jessica Davis Ba

Jessica Davis Ba is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Counselor.  She served as Senior Coordinator and Special Advisor for Africa in the Office of the Vice President, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C.  Before returning to Washington, Ms. Davis Ba served as the Chargé d’affaires, a.i. of the U.S. Embassy N’Djamena, Chad and prior to that she was the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Mission to the African Union and the U.S. Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Economic Commission for Africa, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ms. Davis Ba’s record of success as a leader, coupled with her considerable experience as a policy advisor and practitioner over the course of two decades of diplomatic service, make her an excellent candidate for Ambassador to the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire.

Among her other assignments, Ms. Davis Ba served as Deputy Program Director at the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as the Special Assistant in the State Department Operation Center’s Office of Crisis Management and Strategy and as Deputy Director, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement at the U.S. Embassy, Baghdad, Iraq. Her extensive regional expertise includes service as Deputy Counselor for Economic Affairs and Regional Labor Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, as Political/Economic Officer for the Somalia Affairs Unit in the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, as the Chief of the Political, Economic and Commercial Section of the U.S. Embassy in Conakry, Guinea, and as a Political Officer at the U.S. Consulate in Lagos, Nigeria. 

Ms. Davis Ba earned her B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania and her M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication. She is the recipient of numerous awards including the 2020 State Department One Team Award and many performance awards. She speaks French and Spanish.

Back to Top
#### William J. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-263.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1980.

William J. Tillman, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. See: *Schneble v. State,*201 So.2d 881 (Fla.1967); *State v. Allen,*335 So.2d 823 (Fla.1976); *Zuberi v. State,*343 So.2d 664 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Jones v. State,*360 So.2d 1293 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); *Rodriguez v. State,*379 So.2d 657 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
# C_2006098EN.01000101.xml

| 26.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 April 2006

(2006/C 98/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2425 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3326 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5733 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5761 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,395 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 263,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8699 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4570 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,100 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6437 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6636 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4130 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6338 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9728 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9722 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 174,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5066 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9599 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2995 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 950,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,525 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,480 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,745 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2425

JPY

Japanese yen

142,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3326

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5733

ISK

Iceland króna

92,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5761

CZK

Czech koruna

28,395

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

263,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8699

RON

Romanian leu

3,4570

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,100

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6437

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6636

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4130

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6338

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9728

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9722

KRW

South Korean won

1 174,29

ZAR

South African rand

7,5066

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9599

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2995

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 950,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,525

PHP

Philippine peso

64,480

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0250

THB

Thai baht

46,745

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeForeign Language Training...Foreign Language Training Orientation

# 									Foreign Language Training Orientation							

Foreign Service Institute

The School of Language Studies (SLS) is happy to welcome all new language students to FSI! SLS is here to support you throughout your language training and we have an abundance of resources to help you succeed in learning the language and culture of your ongoing post.

**The next Language Training Orientation is scheduled for July 8th, 2024.**

Beginning July 3rd, 2023, language instruction at FSI will be conducted in-person five days a week at the George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center, 4000 Arlington Blvd., Arlington, VA.All language classes that begin on or after July 3rdwill be in–person. Language Training Supervisors will provide additional information via email to enrolled students approximately three weeks prior to the start of training.

Questions may be emailed to **FSISLSInquiries@state.gov**or to the Director of the appropriate instructional language division:

East Asian and Pacific Languages – Christopher Crocoll

European and African Languages (***including French***) – Julie Cali

Near East, Central and South Asian Languages – Thomas Conners

Romance Languages – Christina Cavella

Slavic and Eurasian Languages – Linda Manning

 

Welcome to the School of Language Studies. We look forward to working with you!

Tags

Foreign Service InstituteTraining

Back to Top
# C_2006131EN.01000202.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzhof — Hans-Jürgen Ritter-Coulais, Monique Ritter-Coulais v Finanzamt Germersheim

(Case C-152/03) (1)

1

(Tax legislation - Income tax - Article 48 EEC (subsequently Article 48 EC, now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) - National rules restricting recognition of rental income losses from immovable property situated in another Member State)

(2006/C 131/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Hans-Jürgen Ritter-Coulais, Monique Ritter-Coulais

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Germersheim

Defendant:

Re:

REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Articles 43 and 56 EC — National legislation on personal income tax limiting the right to deduct rental income losses from immovable property and applying the negative tax progression clause only to those losses relating to property situated in the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Article 48 of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 48 of the EC Treaty and now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not permit natural persons in receipt of income from employment in one Member State, and assessable to tax on their total income there, to have income losses relating to their own use of a private dwelling in another Member State taken into account for the purposes of determining the rate of taxation applicable to their income in the former state, whereas positive rental income relating to such a dwelling is taken into account.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 05.07.2003

1

---
Note 11:  Related Party  Transaction  Watermark  originally  entered into a
republishing  and distribution  agreement with a UK company (the  "Distributor")
which provided the Distributor with exclusive distribution rights of Watermark's
products in defined territories.  The Chief Executive Officer of the Distributor
is the brother of Watermark's then President and Chief Executive Officer. During
1995,  Watermark elected to purchase the portion of the  Distributor's  business
related to selling  Watermark's  products at a negotiated  price of $2.5 million
which is included in merger and other costs in 1995.