alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006121EN.01001302.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/13

---

Action brought on 8 August 2005 — Fermont v Commission

(Case T-307/05)

(2006/C 121/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alain Fermont (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: L. Kakiese, lawyer, and N. Luzeyemo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the European Commission to procure the cessation of the highly damaging machinations against the applicant of the two officials complained about both of whom are infringing the rules of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to procure the cessation of the highly damaging machinations against the applicant of the two officials complained about both of whom are infringing the rules of the Staff Regulations;

| — | make a declaration that the duty to protect legitimate expectations has been infringed; |
| --- | --- |

—

make a declaration that the duty to protect legitimate expectations has been infringed;

| — | make a declaration that the applicant has suffered and experienced psychological harassment on the part of the two officials complained about; |
| --- | --- |

—

make a declaration that the applicant has suffered and experienced psychological harassment on the part of the two officials complained about;

| — | order the European Commission, for failing to act in the face of the highly damaging machinations of the two officials against the applicant, to pay EUR 5 040 000 for non-material, physical and material damage. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission, for failing to act in the face of the highly damaging machinations of the two officials against the applicant, to pay EUR 5 040 000 for non-material, physical and material damage.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case had concluded a contract of employment with the Centre for the Development of Undertakings (CDU), a structure dependent on the Group of ACP States. As part of the performance of that contract, the applicant's task was to implement the harmonisation of the health authorities and the monitoring of fishing in Sao Tomé and Principe and in the Gulf of Guinea.

The applicant alleges, first of all, that the defendant impeded the performance of his functions.

The applicant also alleges infringement of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and of the provisions of the Staff Regulations prohibiting psychological harassment and enshrining the duty of independence.

---
<PAGE>
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


         Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), whose signature appears below hereby
appoints Todd B. Barnum or William C. Niegsch, Jr., or either of them, as his or
her attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report") for the fiscal year ended October 28, 2001, and likewise to sign and
file any and all amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual
Report, and the Company hereby also appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and
behalf, each such person and the Company hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 11th day of
December, 2001.


Signature                                  Title
---------                                  -----


/s/ Todd B. Barnum                         Chairman, President, Chief Executive
-----------------------------------        Officer and Director
Todd B. Barnum


/s/  William C. Niegsch, Jr.               Executive Vice President, Chief
-----------------------------------        Financial Officer, Treasurer,
William C. Niegsch, Jr.                    Secretary and Director


/s/ Mark F. Emerson                        Chief Operating Officer and Director
-----------------------------------
Mark F. Emerson


/s/ William E. Arthur                      Director
-----------------------------------
William E. Arthur


/s/ Thomas R. Green                        Director
-----------------------------------
Thomas R. Green


/s/ Robert A. Rothman                      Director
-----------------------------------
Robert A. Rothman


/s/ Roger D. Blackwell                     Director
-----------------------------------
Roger D. Blackwell


/s/ Michael D. Murphy                      Director
-----------------------------------
Michael D. Murphy
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2013 1.01E+07 0 20 2013 1.50E+09 0 30 2013 2.94E+08 0 40 2013 1.01E+07 0 50 2013 6.25E+07 0 60 2013 1.41E+08 0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         107,234
<SECURITIES>                                    27,485
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,268)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               402,558
<PP&E>                                       1,167,081
<DEPRECIATION>                               (408,065)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,594,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          506,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     769,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,594,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,968,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,770,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                    81,541
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

|                                                                  |  |  |                                   |  |  |                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|-----------------------------------|--|--|--------------------------------|
| Name                                                             |  |  | Jurisdiction of Organization      |  |  | Percentage ownedby the Company |
| 1.    508790 N.B. Inc.                       |  |  | Province of New Brunswick, Canada |  |  | 100%                           |
| 2.    Filtran Microcircuits Inc.             |  |  | Province of New Brunswick, Canada |  |  | 100%                           |
| 3.    Multi-Mix® Microtechnology, S.R.L. |  |  | Costa Rica                        |  |  | 100%                           |
|                                                                  |

----
HomeRomania

# Romania

148 items

        -    TIAS  		Romania (12975) – Agreement on Cooperation in Science and Technology	  April 5, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (12974) – Air Transport Agreement	  August 19, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (12976) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Their Customs Administrations	  June 1, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (96-1101) – Agreement Concerning Economic, Technical and Related Assistance	  November 1, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (95-331) – Defense Assistance Agreement	  March 31, 1995 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (94-115.1) – Treaty Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment	  January 15, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (93-1108) – Agreement on Trade Relations	  November 8, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (91-306) – Finance SWAP Agreement	  March 6, 1991 

previous page1…131415

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.182 Criteria for approval of exception requests. ( a ) CMS may approve exceptions to a pediatric ESRD facility's prospective payment rate if the pediatric ESRD facility did not have an approved exception rate as of October 1, 2002.
( b ) The pediatric ESRD facility must demonstrate, by convincing objective evidence, that its total per treatment costs are reasonable and allowable under the relevant cost reimbursement principles of part 413 and that its per treatment costs in excess of its payment rate are directly attributable to any of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Pediatric patient mix, as specified in § 413.184.
( 2 ) Self-dialysis training costs in pediatric facilities, as specified in § 413.186.
[70 FR 70331, Nov. 21, 2005]
# C_2006011EN.01001002.xml

| 17.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4005 — Ineos/Innovene)

(2006/C 11/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.314 Special rules for beneficiaries enrolled in MA MSA plans. ( a ) *Establishment and designation of medical savings account (MSA).* A beneficiary who elects coverage under an MA MSA plan— ( 1 ) Must establish an MA MSA with a trustee that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 2 ) If he or she has more than one MA MSA, designate the particular account to which payments under the MA MSA plan are to be made.
( b ) *Requirements for MSA trustees.* An entity that acts as a trustee for an MA MSA must— ( 1 ) Register with CMS;
( 2 ) Certify that it is a licensed bank, insurance company, or other entity qualified, under sections 408(a)(2) or 408(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to act as a trustee of individual retirement accounts;
( 3 ) Agree to comply with the MA MSA provisions of section 138 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
( 4 ) Provide any other information that CMS may require.
( c ) *Deposit in the MA MSA.* ( 1 ) The payment is calculated as follows: ( i ) The monthly MA MSA premium is compared with 1 ⁄ 12 of the annual capitation rate applied under this section for the.
( ii ) If the monthly MA MSA premium is less than 1 ⁄ 12 of the annual capitation rate applied under this section for the area, the difference is the amount to be deposited in the MA MSA for each month for which the beneficiary is enrolled in the MSA plan.
( 2 ) CMS deposits the full amount to which a beneficiary is entitled under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section for the calendar year, beginning with the month in which MA MSA coverage begins.
( 3 ) If the beneficiary's coverage under the MA MSA plan ends before the end of the calendar year, CMS recovers the amount that corresponds to the remaining months of that year.
[70 FR 4729, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 52027, Sept. 1, 2005]
EXHIBIT 10.4.2

C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES
(As Restated Effective January 1, 2017)
AMENDMENT
C&F Financial Corporation (the “Plan Sponsor”) has adopted the Virginia Bankers Association Model Non Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (the “Plan”). Pursuant to paragraph 14.1 of the Plan, the Plan Sponsor hereby adopts the following administrative and compliance amendments to the Plan:
	1.	Effective November 1, 2018, subparagraph 9.4(b)(1) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

“(i)The quotient obtained by dividing (A) the amount of such Participant’s vested Deferral Account held in the applicable subdivision, determined as though a lump-sum payment were being made as of the last Valuation Date preceding the date of payment of such installment, by (B) the number of installment payments then remaining to be made; or”
	2.	Effective November 1,2018, subparagraph 3.4(b) is deleted and marked “[RESERVED!” and subparagraph, 3.4(d). including all subsections thereof, is deleted.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby adopted on this 22 day of January, 2019.
Jason E. Long
C&F Financial Corporation
ByJason E. Long
Its SVP & CFO

​
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Sutherland,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Colin SutherlandColin
      SutherlandPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)December
      10, 2010
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Expanding Burma Sanctions Authorities and Imposing Sanctions on Additional Jet Fuel Suppliers

# 									Expanding Burma Sanctions Authorities and Imposing Sanctions on Additional Jet Fuel Suppliers							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 23, 2023

Today, the United States expanded the use of its Burma-related sanctions authorities to allow for sanctions to be imposed on any foreign individual or entity determined to be operating in the jet fuel sector of Burma’s economy.  This expands our ability to exert pressure on Burma’s military regime while further supporting the people of Burma.

The U.S. Government is also designating two individuals and three entities involved in the procurement and distribution of jet fuel to Burma’s military regime.

The United States will continue to seek to deprive the military regime of the resources that enable its oppression of the people of Burma.

*The Department of the Treasury is taking this action pursuant to**Executive Order 14014**“Blocking Property with Respect to the Situation in Burma.”  For more information about these designations, see the Department of the Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaEconomic AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top
#### Bruce J. TRAHAN v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 80-C-2802.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Bruce J. Trahan, applying for supervisory writs, Civil District Court. Parish of Orleans. No. 80-10286, Div. D.

Denied.

DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3134

To designate the United States Courthouse under construction at 1030 Southwest 3d Avenue, Portland, Oregon, as the ‘‘Mark O. Hatfield United

States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1996

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Ms. FURSE, Mr. BUNN of Oregon, and Mr.

COOLEY of Oregon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse under construction at 1030 Southwest 3d Avenue, Portland, Oregon,

as the ‘‘Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse’’,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MARK O. HATFIELD UNITED

4 STATES COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States Courthouse under construction at

6 1030 Southwest 3d Avenue in Portland, Oregon, shall be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Mark O. Hatfield United

8 States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 3134 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the court4 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Mark O. Hatfield United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 This Act shall take effect on January 3, 1997.

Æ
# C_2005182EN.01000401.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 2 June 2005

in Case C-83/03 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment - Construction of a marina at Fossacesia)

(2005/C 182/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-83/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Amorosi and A. Aresu) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by M. Fiorilli, avocat) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 26 February 2003 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, since the Abruzzo Region did not properly determine whether the project for the construction of a marina at Fossacesia (Chieti) — a project covered by the list in Annex II to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — had characteristics requiring it to be made subject to a procedure to assess its effects on the environment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, since the Abruzzo Region did not properly determine whether the project for the construction of a marina at Fossacesia (Chieti) — a project covered by the list in Annex II to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — had characteristics requiring it to be made subject to a procedure to assess its effects on the environment, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.05.2003

1

---
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merisel, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald R. Uzzi, as Chief Executive Officer and Victor L. Cisario as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donald R. Uzzi


-------------------------------------


Donald R. Uzzi


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Victor L. Cisario


--------------------------------------


Victor L. Cisario


Chief Financial Officer





November 15, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report.  A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 417.832 Applicability of requirements and procedures. ( a ) The administrative review rights and procedures specified in §§ 417.834 through 417.840 pertain to disputes involving an organization determination, as defined in § 417.838, with which the enrollee is dissatisfied.
( b ) Physicians and other individuals who furnish items or services under arrangements with an HCPP have no right of administrative review under §§ 417.834 through 417.840.
( c ) The provisions of part 405 dealing with the representation of parties apply to organization determinations and appeals.
( d ) The provisions of part 405 dealing with administrative law judge hearings, Medicare Appeals Council review, and judicial review are applicable, unless otherwise provided.
[59 FR 59943, Nov. 21, 1994, as amended at 70 FR 4713, Jan. 28, 2005]