# 641 Melt Furnace

NAIMA/U.S. EPA
Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Knauf Insulation GmbH

Shasta Lake Plant 3100 Ashby Road
Shasta Lake, California 96019

Project No. 10-3990.17
January 19, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the 641 Glass Melt Furnace

located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Shast a Lake, California:

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

## ii Table I Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate
(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate
(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable

Particulate < 4.7E-02 7.2E-01

Antimony < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04

Arsenic < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04

Beryllium < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05

Cadmium < 4.8E-06 7.3E-05

Chromium 3.5E-05 5.4E-04

Cobalt < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05

Lead 1.3E-05 2.1E-04

Manganese < 2.8E-05 4.2E-04

Nickel 3.0E-05 4.6E-04 641

Melter October 19,

2010

Selenium < 7.4E-05 1.1E-03

641

Melter October 18,

2010 Mercury 2.3E-04 3.4E-03

641

Melter October 18,

2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 7.9E-06 1.2E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 641

Melter October 19,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method
detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the
sample fractions.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

## iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 1

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3

3.3 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .................. 3

3.4 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 3

3.5 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .. 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 1

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Method 1 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Di agram Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng Figure 3 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng Figure 4 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing Figure 5 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing Figure 6 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results Appendix B – Production Data Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the 641 Glass Melt Furnace located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH (Knauf) Plant in Shasta Lake, California:

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on October 18 and 19, 2010. The test program consiste d of triplicate emission tests at one exhaust stack for each parameter. The field sampling porti on of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1
Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Barry Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.
John Peterson Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.
Dave McCune Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.
Shannon Scrugham Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.
Arlene Bell Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.

Randall Peterson Knauf Insulation GmbH

2.0 Process Description

The Knauf Shasta Lake Plant feeds batch and cullet to the natural gas-fired 641 Melt Furnace where they are melted. The molten glass is formed i nto fiberglass used in the manufacture of
insulation. Exhaust from the 641 Melt Furnace, as well as exhaust from the raw material receiving and weighing operations, is routed to a s ingle stack (641 Furnace) with emissions controlled by a baghouse.

The stack serving Shasta Lake 641 Melt Furnace is r ound and 37 inches in diameter at the test location. The stack is equipped with two emission test ports, each four inches in diameter. Testing was conducted from the rook and ports were approximately four feet above the plant

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 2 

## roof level. Exhaust gas temperatures during the te sting period averaged 130 o 

## F. The Knauf Insulation GmbH facility is located at 3100 Ashby R oad in Shasta Lake California.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program the 641 Melt Furn ace was operated at normal production rates. Process melt rates for the field sampling p ortion of the emissions test program can be found in appendix B. Control equipment data will b e available to U.S. EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into five categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content; (2) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals co ncentrations and emission rates; (3) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and em ission rates; (4) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium conc entrations and emission rates; (5) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentration s and emission rates; and,

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections 3.1 through 3.5, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate”

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in Emissions

from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Proc edure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates either in conjunction with the isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, discrete measurements conducted in support of the n on-isokinetic sampling methodologies.

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance w ith Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a man ometer) and temperatures at each location during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions w as within specified limits, therefore, a baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionl ess) was assigned.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 3 

## Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments (CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission monitoring system is provided as Figure 2.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gr avimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 

## Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission R ates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission r ates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qua rtz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of s ix GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line,

and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were fi lled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinge r was empty, and the fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the metals sampling train is provided as Figure 3.

3.3 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a so rbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sam ple line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water knockout, and the remaining two impinger s contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampl ing train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rat es

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rat es were measured using the procedures of Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. He xavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a gl ass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recircul ating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a
calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 4 

## next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the f ourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.5 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and e mission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. T he Method 26A sampling train consisted of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner ; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter was hed quartz filter with Teflon filter support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) i mpingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known we ight of silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figur e 6 provides an illustration of the Method 26A sample train.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 1 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Table 2.

Table 2
Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate
(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate
(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable

Particulate < 4.7E-02 7.2E-01

Antimony < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04

Arsenic < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04

Beryllium < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05

Cadmium < 4.8E-06 7.3E-05

Chromium 3.5E-05 5.4E-04

Cobalt < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05

Lead 1.3E-05 2.1E-04

Manganese < 2.8E-05 4.2E-04

Nickel 3.0E-05 4.6E-04 641

Melter October 19,

2010

Selenium < 7.4E-05 1.1E-03

641

Melter October 18,

2010 Mercury 2.3E-04 3.4E-03

641

Melter October 18,

2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 7.9E-06 1.2E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 641

Melter October 19,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method
detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the
sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test run a re summarized in Appendix A. Process production data is included in Appendix B. Field a nd computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibr ation documents and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No . 10-3990.17

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 2 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Knauf Insulation GmbH. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by:

David Center Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by: Randal J. Tysar Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### Diameter:

37.00 in

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.5

10 4.4

9 6.5

8 9.3

7 13.2

6 23.8

5 27.8

4 30.5

3 32.6

2 34.5

1 36.2

Site:

Knauf Insulation

Shasta Lake, California Site

Glass Melt Furnace Stack

BTEC Job# 10-3990.17 

## Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

## Method 1

Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Knauf Insulation

Shasta Lake, California Site BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases
(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas
Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar
bagFigure 3Site:USEPA Method 29Knauf InsulationShasta Lake, California SiteBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale Michigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 4Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationShasta Lake, California SiteBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 5Site:USEPA Method 0061Knauf InsulationShasta Lake, California SiteBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationShasta Lake, California SiteBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220PumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

# APPENDIX A

Detailed Test Run ResultsPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:03:00 10:12:00 13:22:00

Run Finish Time 9:57:30 13:04:30 16:24:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 172.5 172.5 180 175

D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.245 0.245 0.245 0.245

C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10

∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 2.76 1.95 1.82 2.18

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.150 133.700 136.970 134.940

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.96 91.70 97.79 90.48

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 126.079 123.188 124.782 124.683

V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 43.7 43.5 37.8 41.7

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.06 2.05 1.78 1.96

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.5

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.984 0.984 0.986 0.985

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.8

%O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.56 20.56 20.6

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.65 78.65 78.65 78.7

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.95 28.95 28.95

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.77 28.77 28.79 28.78

P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -8.25 -8.25 -8.25 -8.25

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.49 28.49 28.49 28.49

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 112 123 129 121

∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.570 0.581 0.563 0.571

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 45.2 46.2 45.6 45.7

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 17,531 17,527

17,220

17,426

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 20,264 20,677

20,448

20,463

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 95.2 93.0 91.9 93.3

W p Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 2.5 2.2 2.9 2.5

C mg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

C mg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

C mg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

C mg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 3.8E-06 3.7E-06 3.7E-06

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.37 0.20 0.26

C mg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 1.1E-04 5.7E-05 7.3E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 7.0E-06 3.7E-06 4.8E-06

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 2.23 1.41 2.07 1.90

C mg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 6.2E-04 4.0E-04 5.9E-04 5.4E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.1E-05 2.7E-05 3.8E-05 3.5E-05

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

C mg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 3.8E-06 3.7E-06 3.7E-06

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 0.62 0.40 1.18 0.73

C mg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-04 1.1E-04 3.3E-04 2.1E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 7.5E-06 2.2E-05 1.3E-05

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

C mg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-04 4.3E-04 4.2E-04 4.2E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-05 2.8E-05 2.7E-05 2.8E-05

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 1.81 1.21 1.91 1.64

C mg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 5.1E-04 3.5E-04 5.4E-04 4.6E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-05 2.3E-05 3.5E-05 3.0E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.1 8.0 4.0

C mg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-04 6.0E-04 2.3E-03 1.1E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 4.0E-05 1.5E-04 7.4E-05

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.17

KNAUF

SHASTA 641 Melter Furnace Source

SS PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**Knauf Insulation Shasta Lake California 641 Melter Furnace Melt Furnace Stack Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"** Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test Method CommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)**1 10/18/2010 7:30 10/18/2010 9:42 5.94E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B Stack gas info [%Mois, O2, CO2,** **acfm, dscfm] from 0061 Run 1 4.18E-04** **2 10/18/2010 9:54 10/18/2010 11:54 2.57E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B Stack gas info [%Mois, O2, CO2,** **acfm, dscfm] from 0061 Run 2 1.66E-04** **3 10/18/2010 12:20 10/18/2010 14:20 1.67E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B Stack gas info [%Mois, O2, CO2,** **acfm, dscfm] from 0061 Run 3 1.07E-04** Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results**Page 1 of 3 1/19/2011** M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)**0.3 0.6 20.6 21,305 18,806 107.1 R1, A 944.0 0.0 944 0 944 0.16 2% 0** **5.94 2.3 0.6 20.6 20,412 17,271** **118.8 R2, A 366.0 0.2 366.2 0 366.2 0.14 1% 0 2.57** **1.8 0.6 20.6 20,261 17,105 122.2 R3, A 244.0 0.5 244.5 0 244.5 0.15 1% 0** **1.67**Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Trap #1**≤20% of field recovery test** **≤ 10% of Section 1 Hg** **mass for Hg conc. >1** μ**g/dscm: or**≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1**Page 2 of 3 1/19/2011** M30B Mercury TestingTrap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit**R1, B 979.0 0.00 979.00 20 959 0.16 2% 0 5.92** **0.0 0 0.1073 87 R2, B 391.0 0.40 391.40 20 371.4 0.14 1% 0** **2.57 0.0 0 0.1361 98** **R3, B 253.0 0.20 253.20 20 233.2 0.14 1% 0 1.62** **0.1 2 0.0810 58 81** **Average Recovery,** **between 85 and 115%** Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )**≤20% of field recovery test** **≤ 10% of Section 1 Hg mass for** **Hg conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm**≥10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1** **μg/dscm: or**≤**20% RD or**≤**0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff.** **for Hg conc.**≤1μg/dscm**Page 3 of 3 1/19/2011** 

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/18/2010 10/18/2010 10/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:23:00 10:46:00 13:59:00

Run Finish Time 10:26:00 13:48:00 17:00:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218



### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.12 29.12 29.12 29.12



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.38 1.24 1.20 1.27



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 119.475 114.740 114.705 116.307



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 71.93 86.53 93.93 84.13



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 114.087 106.601 105.134 108.607



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 8.4 52.7 39.8 33.6



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.40 2.48 1.87 1.58



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 0.3 2.3 1.8 1.5



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.997 0.977 0.982 0.985



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.6



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.64 20.6 20.6



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.81 78.81 78.81 78.8



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.91 28.91 28.91 28.91



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.67 28.72 28.75



### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -8.5 -8.50 -8.50 -8.50



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.50 28.50 28.50 28.50



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 108 121 125 118



### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.636 0.567 0.555 0.586



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.6 45.6 45.2 46.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 18,806 17,271

17,105

17,727



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 21,305 20,412

20,261

20,659



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.2 98.8 98.4 98.1



### W p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.37



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.3E-04 1.0E-04 1.2E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-06 8.6E-06 6.5E-06 7.9E-06



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.17

Knauf

Lake Shasta 641 Melter Furnace Source

JP Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:35:00 10:46:00 12:32:00

Run Finish Time 10:35:00 12:15:00 13:45:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.244 0.244 0.244 0.244



### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.10 29.12 29.11



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.69 1.63 1.62 1.65



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 55.672 55.230 54.875 55.259



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.29 96.13 98.58 93.67



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 52.715 51.364 50.842 51.640



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 20.7 16.6 20.2 19.2



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.97 0.78 0.95 0.90



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.7



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.982 0.985 0.982 0.983



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.79 0.79 0.7908 0.8



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.56 20.6 20.6



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.65 78.65 78.6434 78.6



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.95 28.95 28.95



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.75 28.78 28.75 28.76



### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -8.5 -8.50 -8.50 -8.50



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.48 28.48 28.50 28.48



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 123 127 128 126



### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.564 0.541 0.528 0.544



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 45.5 44.7 44.2 44.8



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 17,255 16,876

16,627

16,919



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 20,380 20,014

19,801

20,065



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.7 97.3 97.7 97.6



### W p Production, tons glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.17

Knauf

Lake Shasta, Ca Melter Source

JP Personnel

# APPENDIX B

Production Data

# APPENDIX C

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and

NotesBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe ##72PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKNAUFDGM #19WCSMethod29Total Points127:00 7:010.002 @10"LocationSHASTARate (cfm)0.8Run #1Time/pt (min)15.0 10:00 10:01.000 @ 10"Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date19-Oct-10Time/reading7.5OperatorSSBws (%)1.61# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume15.8Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.49Barometric29.10Silica Gel Weight Gain27.9DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.10Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.25Actual Dn (in)0.245O2 (%)20.56Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00033CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.77Act. Flow (cfm)20,264Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 122.60Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,817Moisture % 1.65Preliminary Ts (oF)112Est. Us (ft/s)44.9Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,531Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2344Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 7.5 7:03421.000 0.56 108 78 731.972.1 250 250 48 517.5 15.0 7:10427.280 0.56 108 78 731.9721 250 250 48 5215.0 22.5 7:18433.380 0.58 108 78 732.042 250 250 48 5222.5 30.0 7:25438.900 0.58 108 84 752.042 250 248 54 4330.0 37.5 7:33445.000 0.62 108 85 762.182 251 250 57 4337.5 45.0 7:40451.000 0.62 108 85 762.182 251 250 57 4445.0 52.5 7:48456.680 0.50 107 84 771.761.7 250 247 59 4452.5 60.0 7:55462.500 0.50 107 84 771.761.7 250 247 59 4560.0 67.5 8:03468.000 0.52 110 85 781.831.8 250 250 59 4567.5 75.0 8:10473.350 0.52 110 85 781.831.8 250 250 59 4675.0 82.5 8:18479.000 0.50 111 86 791.761.7 250 250 59 4682.5 90.0 8:25484.600 0.50 111 86 791.761.7 250 250 59 4190.0 97.5 8:35489.900 0.60 112 85 792.112 250 245 59 4197.5 105.0 8:42495.700 0.60 112 85 792.112 250 245 59 42105.0 112.5 8:50501.600 0.62 113 86 802.182 250 248 60 42112.5 120.0 8:57507.600 0.62 113 86 802.182 250 248 60 43120.0 127.5 9:05513.700 0.62 115 87 822.182.1 250 250 60 43127.5 135.0 9:12519.900 0.62 115 87 822.182.1 250 250 60 44135.0 142.5 9:20526.050 0.60 119 90 822.112 250 250 62 44142.5 150.0 9:27532.000 0.60 119 90 822.112 250 250 62 45150.0 157.5 9:35538.100 0.56 117 90 821.971.9 250 249 62 45157.5 165.0 9:42543.900 0.56 117 90 821.971.9 250 249 62 46165.0 172.5 9:50549.500 0.54 117 90 821.901.9 250 249 62 46172.5 9:57555.150Average:134.150.57 111.9 85.4 78.52.012.76 250 249 58 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe ##15PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKNAUFDGM #19WCSMethod29Total Points1210:10 10:11 0.002 @ 10"LocationSHASTARate (cfm)0.8Run #2Time/pt (min)15.013:05 13:06 0.002 @ 10"Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date19-Oct-10Time/reading7.5OperatorSSBws (%)1.6# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume18.3Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.49Barometric29.10Silica Gel Weight Gain25.2DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.10Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.25Actual Dn (in)0.245O2 (%)20.56Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00033CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.77Act. Flow (cfm)20,677Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 120.03Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,819Moisture % 1.68Preliminary Ts (oF)112Est. Us (ft/s)44.9Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,527Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2345Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 7.5 10:12555.800 0.56 119 85 851.971.92 261 250 60 517.5 15.0 10:19561.630 0.56 119 85 851.971.92 261 250 60 5215.0 22.5 10:27567.500 0.56 125 92 851.971.92 250 251 61 5222.5 30.0 10:34573.000 0.56 125 92 851.971.92 250 251 61 5330.0 37.5 10:42578.890 0.60 127 94 872.112 250 249 62 5337.5 45.0 10:49584.850 0.60 127 94 872.112 250 249 62 5445.0 52.5 10:57590.880 0.65 126 96 882.292 250 249 65 5452.5 60.0 11:04597.000 0.65 126 96 882.292 250 249 65 5560.0 67.5 11:12603.100 0.60 119 96 882.112 251 253 60 5567.5 75.0 11:19608.800 0.60 119 96 882.112 251 253 60 5675.0 82.5 11:27615.000 0.56 122 96 891.972 253 251 59 5682.5 90.0 11:34620.810 0.56 122 96 891.972 253 251 59 5190.0 97.5 11:42626.500 0.60 124 96 892.112 250 252 59 5197.5 105.0 11:49632.350 0.60 124 96 892.112 250 252 59 52105.0 112.5 11:57638.125 0.58 124 97 902.042 250 252 59 52112.5 120.0 12:04644.000 0.58 124 97 902.042 250 252 59 53120.0 127.5 12:12649.850 0.60 124 97 902.112 250 251 59 53127.5 135.0 12:19655.843 0.60 124 97 902.112 250 251 59 54135.0 142.5 12:27661.830 0.60 124 97 902.112 250 251 59 54142.5 150.0 12:34667.825 0.60 124 97 902.112 250 251 59 55150.0 157.5 12:42673.825 0.52 124 97 911.831.75 250 251 59 55157.5 165.0 12:49678.950 0.52 124 97 911.831.75 250 251 59 56165.0 172.5 12:57684.290 0.50 124 97 911.761.7 250 251 59 56172.5 13:04689.500Average:133.700.58 123.5 94.9 88.52.041.95 251.3 250.9 60.1 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##72PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKNAUFDGM #19WCSMethod29Total Points1213:20 13:210.002 @ 10"LocationSHASTARate (cfm)0.8Run #3Time/pt (min)15.0Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date19-Oct-10Time/reading7.5OperatorSSBws (%)1.4# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume12.9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.49Barometric29.10Silica Gel Weight Gain24.9DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.10Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.25Actual Dn (in)0.245O2 (%)20.56Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00033CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.79Act. Flow (cfm)20,448Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 121.62Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,466Moisture % 1.44Preliminary Ts (oF)112Est. Us (ft/s)44.9Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,220Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2342Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 7.5 13:22692.030 0.55 122 93 941.951.9 256 248 65 517.5 15.0 13:29697.700 0.55 122 93 941.951.8 256 248 65 5215.0 22.5 13:37703.600 0.58 125 93 942.051.8 256 248 65 5222.5 30.0 13:44709.500 0.58 125 93 942.051.8 256 248 65 5330.0 37.5 13:52715.470 0.60 125 100 942.121.8 249 249 65 5337.5 45.0 13:59721.560 0.60 125 100 942.121.8 249 249 65 5445.0 52.5 14:07727.465 0.60 125 101 942.121.8 250 251 60 5452.5 60.0 14:14733.180 0.60 125 101 942.121.8 250 251 60 5560.0 67.5 14:22739.000 0.56 126 101 941.981.8 251 249 59 5567.5 75.0 14:29744.865 0.56 126 101 941.981.8 251 249 59 5675.0 82.5 14:37750.650 0.56 126 101 941.981.8 251 249 59 5682.5 90.0 14:44756.345 0.56 126 101 941.981.8 251 249 59 5190.0 97.5 14:54762.100 0.58 126 101 942.051.9 250 249 59 5197.5 105.0 15:01767.900 0.58 126 101 942.051.9 250 249 59 52105.0 112.5 15:09773.670 0.52 135 101 951.841.7 258 250 59 52112.5 120.0 15:16779.050 0.52 135 101 951.841.7 258 250 59 53120.0 127.5 15:24784.500 0.55 135 103 971.951.8 250 252 60 53127.5 135.0 15:31790.000 0.55 135 103 971.951.8 250 252 60 54135.0 142.5 15:39795.800 0.58 133 103 982.051.9 250 249 60 54142.5 150.0 15:46801.600 0.58 133 103 982.051.9 250 249 60 55150.0 157.5 15:54807.350 0.54 133 103 981.911.86 250 249 60 55157.5 165.0 16:01813.000 0.54 133 103 981.911.86 250 249 60 56165.0 172.5 16:09818.490 0.54 133 103 981.911.86 250 249 60 56172.5 180.0 16:16824.000 0.54 133 103 981.911.86 250 249 60 5180.0 16:24829.000Average:136.970.56 128.7 100.3 95.31.991.82 251.8 249.3 60.9166667 5.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location ReddingRate (L/m)1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)# of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2)7.54768CO2 (%)0.55Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.55Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.91Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B7:30:00 AM 0.0 105.0 258 259 1.00 1.05 6 7 6.53 6.24 60 60 4501.8 46985.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 13.31 12.568 61 6210.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 19.84 18.798 61 6115.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 27.20 25.2 61 6120.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 34.80 32.4 61 6125.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 41.33 38.65 61 6130.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 49.68 43.5 61 6035.0 105.0 260 258 1.00 1.05 6 8 56.10 51.25 61 6040.0 105.0 260 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 61.45 58.6 61 6045.0 105.0 259 260 0.08 1.40 5 9 68.10 66.28 62 6250.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.00 6 7 75.80 75.1 63 6355.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.00 6 8 83.50 82.7 63 6360.0 105.0 258 258 1.00 1.20 6 9 89.10 88.1 63 6365.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.20 6 7 90.10 93.1 63 6370.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.40 6 10 94.98 96.1 63 6375.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.40 6 10 102.20 100.67 64 6480.0 108.0 255 255 0.08 0.08 5 5 107.99 104.99 66 6685.0 112.0 255 255 0.08 1.20 5 7 113.85 110.1 67 6790.0 112.0 255 255 0.08 1.40 5 7 119.70 115.2 67 6795.0 112.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 7 125.50 121.6 67 67100.0 110.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 131.31 128.66 68 68105.0 112.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 137.00 135 69 69110.0 112.0 260 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 142.90 141.9 69 69115.0 113.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 148.83 148.83 70 709:42:00 AM 120.0154.960 155.3174663.8 4863Average 120.0 107.1 258.5 259.263.83333333 63.75Volume148.431 149.079162 165dscm0.15 0.15158.92 161.89Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempPost Test0.002 @ 8" 0.000 @ 8" 0.002 @ 8" 0.000 @ 8"Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location ReddingRate (L/m)1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)# of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2)7.54768CO2 (%)0.55Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.55Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.91Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B9:54:00 AM 0.0 110.0 259 260 1.0 1.0 5 7 0.00 0 72 72 4664.2 4864.65.0 110.0 259 260 1.0 1.0 5 7 6.20 6.5 72 7210.0 115.0 259 260 1.0 1.2 5 7 12.46 12 73 7315.0 115.0 259 260 1.0 1.2 5 7 18.50 18.1 73 7320.0 123.0 260 259 1.0 1.2 5 8 24.75 24.02 74 7425.0 123.0 259 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 30.88 30.28 74 7530.0 122.0 259 259 1.0 1.0 6 8 37.15 36.59 75 7535.0 122.0 259 259 1.0 1.0 6 8 43.55 42.69 75 7540.0 122.0 260 260 1.0 1.0 6 8 49.58 49.05 76 7545.0 117.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 55.78 56.01 76 7650.0 115.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 62.70 63 76 7655.0 115.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 68.90 69.1 76 7660.0 119.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 75.14 75.8 78 7665.0 116.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 80.80 80.1 78 7870.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 6 86.81 86.28 79 7875.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 93.16 92.168 79 7980.0 122.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 99.32 98.55 79 7985.0 119.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 105.75 105.65 79 8090.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 111.80 112.78 81 8195.0 120.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 118.10 118.5 81 81100.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 129.20 126.52 82 81105.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 130.50 132.5 82 82110.0 121.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 136.40 137.2 83 82115.0 121.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 142.55 143.02 83 8311:54 120.0 121.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 148.087 149.959 83 83 4813.2 5015.8Average 120.0 118.8 258.6 259.377.56 77.40Volume148.087 149.959149 151.2dscm0.14 0.14142.44 144.58Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12"0.004 @ 12"0.004 @ 12"Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location ReddingRate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)# of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2)7.54768CO2 (%)0.6Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.55Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.91Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B12:20:00 PM 0.0 118.0 258 258 1.0 1.0 5 5 0.00 0 86 86 4813.3 50165.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 5 6 6.48 5.81 86 8610.0 118.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 12.75 11.95 86 8615.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 18.87 17.87 85 8520.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 25.60 24.6 85 8525.0 118.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 31.85 30.87 86 8630.0 124.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 38.50 38.75 86 8635.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 44.15 45.25 86 8640.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 50.75 50.95 87 8745.0 121.0 259 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 56.85 56.55 87 8750.0 125.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 62.85 62.5 87 8755.0 125.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 68.85 68.56 88 8860.0 125.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 75.78 76.1 88 8865.0 120.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 82.10 83.25 88 8870.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 88.80 89.6 89 8975.0 127.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 94.75 95.81 89 8980.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 100.55 101.55 90 9085.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 107.51 108.45 90 9090.0 130.0 259 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 113.90 114.5 90 9095.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 120.20 119.2 90 90100.0 123.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 126.21 124.926 90 90105.0 121.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 132.51 131.125 91 91110.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 138.61 140.125 91 91115.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 144.90 142.281 91 9114:20 120.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 149.150 148.975 91 91 4969.00 5169.80Average 120.0 122.2 258.6 258.988.12 88.12Volume149.150 148.975155.7 153.8dscm0.14 0.14145.97 144.19Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempPost Test0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12" 0.005 @ 12" 0.005 @ 12"Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #15PollutantCr6Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #19-WCSMethod61Total Points127:15 7:160.000@10"LocationLake ShastaRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)15.0 10:27 10:280.000@8"Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date18-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorJPBws (%)0.35# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume-21.9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12Silica Gel Weight Gain30.3DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.64Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.6Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.88Act. Flow (cfm)21,305Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 111.25Preliminary dP (in H20)0.75Total Vol.(cf)135.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)18,871Moisture % 0.35Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)52.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)18,806Preliminary Tm (oF)70Theor Dn (in)0.2195Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 7:2366.56 0.55 91 59 611.231.256 415.0 10.0 7:2869.532 0.55 101 65 611.231.256 4110.0 15.0 7:3372.645 0.55 101 66 611.231.256 4215.0 20.0 7:3875.965 0.69 101 67 621.541.554 4220.0 25.0 7:4379.422 0.69 102 69 621.541.554 4225.0 30.0 7:4882.78 0.69 103 70 631.541.554 4330.0 35.0 7:5385.999 0.69 103 70 631.541.557 4335.0 40.0 7:5889.655 0.69 104 71 631.541.557 4340.0 45.0 8:0392.908 0.69 104 71 641.541.557 4445.0 50.0 8:0896.43 0.67 104 71 641.501.4558 4450.0 55.0 8:1399.801 0.67 105 71 651.501.4558 4455.0 60.0 8:18103.123 0.67 104 71 651.501.4558 4560.0 65.0 8:23106.434 0.65 105 73 661.451.458 4565.0 70.0 8:28109.789 0.65 105 73 661.451.458 4570.0 75.0 8:33113.021 0.65 105 73 661.451.458 4675.0 80.0 8:38116.43 0.55 104 73 661.231.258 4680.0 85.0 8:43119.60 0.55 104 74 671.231.258 4685.0 90.0 8:48122.77 0.55 104 74 671.231.258 4190.0 95.0 8:56125.689 0.66 107 74 681.471.4556 4195.0 100.0 9:01129.089 0.62 105 75 691.381.3555 41100.0 105.0 9:06132.546 0.62 111 77 701.381.3555 42105.0 110.0 9:11136.019 0.62 109 78 701.381.3557 42110.0 115.0 9:16139.056 0.64 110 78 711.431.458 42115.0 120.0 9:21142.39 0.64 110 79 711.431.458 43120.0 125.0 9:26145.65 0.66 113 80 721.471.4558 43125.0 130.0 9:31149.10 0.66 112 73 801.471.4558 43130.0 135.0 9:36152.545 0.66 113 81 731.471.4558 44135.0 140.0 9:41155.85 0.66 113 81 741.471.4560 44140.0 145.0 9:46159.32 0.62 111 82 751.381.3560 44145.0 150.0 9:51162.565 0.62 108 82 751.381.3558 45150.0 155.0 9:56165.89 0.68 111 82 751.521.4558 45155.0 160.0 10:01169.486 0.63 115 83 761.411.3557 45160.0 165.0 10:06172.90 0.63 117 83 761.411.3558 46165.0 170.0 10:11176.10 0.63 119 83 771.411.3558 46170.0 175.0 10:16179.498 0.63 122 84 771.411.3558 46175.0 180.0 10:21182.667 0.63 122 84 781.411.3558 4180.0 10:26186.03Average:119.480.64 107.7 75.0 68.91.421.38 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 57.25 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #15PollutantCr6Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #19-WCSMethod61Total Points1210:44 10:450.00@10"LocationLake ShastaRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)15.0 10:49 10:500.00@6"Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date18-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorJPBws (%)2.3# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume27Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12Silica Gel Weight Gain25.7DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.64Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.1An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.6Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.67Act. Flow (cfm)20,412Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 103.99Preliminary dP (in H20)0.75Total Vol.(cf)135.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,673Moisture % 2.33Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)52.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,271Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2182Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 10:46189.70 0.60 117 82 791.301.357 415.0 10.0 10:51192.997 0.60 119 84 791.301.3057 4110.0 15.0 10:56196.08 0.60 119 84 791.301.3057 4215.0 20.0 11:01199.2 0.53 120 86 811.151.2057 4220.0 25.0 11:06202.3 0.53 121 87 811.151.2057 4225.0 30.0 11:11205.3 0.55 121 87 811.201.2057 4330.0 35.0 11:16208.398 0.60 120 87 811.301.3055 4335.0 40.0 11:21211.413 0.59 123 88 821.281.3054 4340.0 45.0 11:26214.645 0.60 119 88 821.301.3055 4445.0 50.0 11:31218.00 0.57 119 88 821.241.2555 4450.0 55.0 11:36221.234 0.55 119 88 821.201.2055 4455.0 60.0 11:41224.231 0.55 123 88 831.201.2055 4560.0 65.0 11:46227.432 0.59 120 89 831.281.3055 4565.0 70.0 11:51230.8 0.55 123 89 841.201.2055 4570.0 75.0 11:56233.8 0.54 123 89 841.171.1555 4675.0 80.0 12:01237.01 0.54 122 89 841.171.1556 4680.0 85.0 12:06240.06 0.55 122 89 841.201.2056 4685.0 90.0 12:11243.21 0.55 123 90 841.201.2056 4190.0 95.0 12:18246.395 0.55 117 89 851.201.2059 4195.0 100.0 12:23249.583 0.55 120 89 851.201.2058 41100.0 105.0 12:28253 0.60 120 89 851.301.3057 42105.0 110.0 12:33256.315 0.62 120 89 851.351.3558 42110.0 115.0 12:38259.655 0.62 120 89 851.351.3558 42115.0 120.0 12:43263.099 0.64 118 90 851.391.4059 43120.0 125.0 12:48266.30 0.59 120 90 851.281.3058 43125.0 130.0 12:53269.60 0.59 118 90 851.281.3059 43130.0 135.0 12:58272.765 0.57 118 90 851.241.2559 44135.0 140.0 13:03276.01 0.52 117 91 861.131.1559 44140.0 145.0 13:08279.14 0.52 118 91 861.131.1560 44145.0 150.0 13:13282.209 0.60 123 92 861.301.3060 45150.0 155.0 13:18285.6 0.60 125 92 871.301.3061 45155.0 160.0 13:23288.905 0.54 120 93 871.171.2061 45160.0 165.0 13:28292.10 0.54 122 92 871.171.2062 46165.0 170.0 13:33295.30 0.52 125 93 871.131.1562 46170.0 175.0 13:38298.298 0.52 127 93 881.131.1562 46175.0 180.0 13:43301.4 0.52 127 94 881.131.1563 4180.0 13:48304.435Average:114.740.57 120.8 89.1 83.91.231.24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 57.8 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #15PollutantCr6Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #19-WCSMethod61Total Points1213:56 13:570.015@10"LocationLake ShastaRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)15.0 17:01 17:020.015@10"Source641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@1.822Date18-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorJPBws (%)1.8# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume10.9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12Silica Gel Weight Gain28.9DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.64Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.1An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.6Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.72Act. Flow (cfm)20,261Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 102.57Preliminary dP (in H20)0.75Total Vol.(cf)135.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,409Moisture % 1.79Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)52.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,105Preliminary Tm (oF)70Theor Dn (in)0.2208Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 13:59305.33 0.58 121 92 891.281.2566 315.0 10.0 14:04308.7 0.58 120 93 891.281.2559 3110.0 15.0 14:09311.99 0.58 120 93 891.281.2556 3215.0 20.0 14:14315.3 0.58 119 93 891.281.2556 3220.0 25.0 14:19318.557 0.60 120 93 891.321.356 3225.0 30.0 14:24321.855 0.60 120 93 891.321.356 3330.0 35.0 14:29325.1 0.60 125 93 891.321.357 3335.0 40.0 14:34328.5 0.50 124 94 901.10158 3340.0 45.0 14:39331.6 0.58 123 93 901.281.2559 3445.0 50.0 14:44334.80 0.58 122 93 901.281.2559 3450.0 55.0 14:49338 0.58 123 92 901.281.2559 3455.0 60.0 14:54341.3 0.55 120 93 901.211.1556 3560.0 65.0 14:59344.49 0.60 120 96 911.321.356 3565.0 70.0 15:04347.8 0.60 120 96 921.321.356 3570.0 75.0 15:09351.08 0.58 122 96 901.281.2555 3675.0 80.0 15:14354.30 0.56 120 97 911.241.255 3680.0 85.0 15:19357.35 0.55 122 97 911.211.256 3685.0 90.0 15:24360.32 0.55 123 98 911.211.256 3190.0 95.0 15:30363.6 0.58 120 97 911.281.2558 3195.0 100.0 15:35366.908 0.51 126 97 921.131.158 31100.0 105.0 15:40369.93 0.51 123 97 921.131.158 32105.0 110.0 15:45372.96 0.57 122 97 921.261.2557 32110.0 115.0 15:50376.255 0.57 124 97 921.261.2358 32115.0 120.0 15:55379.4 0.55 129 97 921.211.258 33120.0 125.0 16:00382.60 0.55 132 98 931.211.258 33125.0 130.0 16:05385.88 0.55 133 98 931.211.259 33130.0 135.0 16:10389.1 0.55 133 99 941.211.260 34135.0 140.0 16:15392.30 0.55 133 99 941.211.260 34140.0 145.0 16:20395.42 0.55 128 99 941.211.259 34145.0 150.0 16:25398.7 0.55 129 99 941.211.260 35150.0 155.0 16:30401.899 0.55 129 99 941.211.260 35155.0 160.0 16:35404.992 0.50 128 99 941.101.160 35160.0 165.0 16:40408.10 0.50 133 99 951.101.161 36165.0 170.0 16:45411.10 0.50 133 99 951.101.161 36170.0 175.0 16:50413.905 0.50 135 99 951.101.161 36175.0 180.0 16:55417.1 0.50 134 99 951.101.162 3180.0 17:00420.035Average:114.710.56 125.2 96.2 91.71.221.20 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 58.3055556 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #57PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #6-WCSMethodM26ATotal Points12LocationLake Shasta, CaRate (cfm)0.8Run #1Time/pt (min)6.0SourceMelterDelta ∆H@1.627Date19-Oct-10Time/reading6.0OperatorJPBws (%)1.81# of Ports2Total Run72.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume7.7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.48Barometric29.10Silica Gel Weight Gain13DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.10Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.244O2 (%)20.56Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00032CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.4737Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.75Act. Flow (cfm)20,380Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 51.36Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)57.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,574Moisture % 1.86Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)45.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)17,255Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2354Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 6.0 8:35122.39 0.54 116 78 761.651.6 250 255 64 1026.0 12.0 8:41127.34 0.50 115 81 761.531.5 247 255 53 9312.0 18.0 8:47131.8 0.62 117 85 791.891.85 250 249 52 11418.0 24.0 8:53136.499 0.60 119 88 801.831.8 247 255 52 11524.0 30.0 8:59141.533 0.57 118 89 811.741.7 255 248 55 10630.0 36.0 9:05146.3 0.55 120 90 831.681.65 251 255 55 10136.0 42.0 9:59150.582 0.54 124 88 861.651.6 250 255 59 10242.0 48.0 10:05154.9 0.56 128 92 871.711.7 248 255 52 10348.0 54.0 10:11159.295 0.60 129 93 871.831.8 248 255 53 10454.0 60.0 10:17164.00 0.56 127 94 881.711.7 250 255 57 10560.0 66.0 10:23168.845 0.57 129 96 891.741.7 248 255 60 10666.0 72.0 10:29173.245 0.56 131 97 881.711.7 248 245 61 1072.0 10:35178.06Average:55.670.56 122.8 89.3 83.31.721.69 249 253 56.0833333 10Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #57PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #6-WCSMethodM26ATotal Points12LocationLake Shasta, CaRate (cfm)0.8Run #2Time/pt (min)6.0SourceMelterDelta ∆H@1.627Date19-Oct-10Time/reading6.0OperatorJPBws (%)1.5# of Ports2Total Run72.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume4.9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.48Barometric29.10Silica Gel Weight Gain11.7DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.10Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.244O2 (%)20.56Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00032CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.78Act. Flow (cfm)20,014Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 50.05Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)57.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)17,133Moisture % 1.54Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)45.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)16,876Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2351Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 6.0 10:46178.30 0.56 132 95 911.741.7 255 250 68 426.0 12.0 10:52183 0.55 133 96 911.711.65 254 254 65 4312.0 18.0 10:58187.396 0.60 130 99 931.861.80 253 240 65 4418.0 24.0 11:04192.4 0.58 129 100 931.801.75 254 255 63 4524.0 30.0 11:10197.055 0.57 124 100 931.771.70 255 256 63 4630.0 36.0 11:16201.698 0.50 121 100 931.551.50 256 256 62 4136.0 42.0 11:39206.06 0.52 125 96 981.611.60 256 256 60 4242.0 48.0 11:45210.6 0.50 125 99 931.551.50 239 255 52 4348.0 54.0 11:51214.779 0.55 128 99 931.711.70 255 256 57 4454.0 60.0 11:57219.65 0.56 129 100 941.741.70 254 256 56 4560.0 66.0 12:03224.431 0.50 124 101 941.551.50 253 256 62 4666.0 72.0 12:09228.901 0.50 124 101 951.551.50 257 256 63 472.0 12:15233.53Average:55.230.54 127.0 98.8 93.41.681.63 253.4 253.8 61.3 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.17Probe #57PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyKnaufDGM #6-WCSMethodM26ATotal Points12LocationLake Shasta, CaRate (cfm)0.8Run #3Time/pt (min)6.0SourceMelterDelta ∆H@1.627Date19-Oct-10Time/reading6.0OperatorJPBws (%)1.8# of Ports2Total Run72.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume8.7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)28.50Barometric29.12Silica Gel Weight Gain11.5DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-8.5Actual Dn (in)0.244O2 (%)20.5658Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.08An (ft^2)0.00032CO2 (%)0.8Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.47Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.75Act. Flow (cfm)19,801Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 49.55Preliminary dP (in H20)0.56Total Vol.(cf)57.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)16,938Moisture % 1.88Preliminary Ts (oF)120Est. Us (ft/s)45.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)16,627Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2355Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 6.0 12:32233.67 0.52 119 96 941.611.6 254 230 61 1026.0 12.0 12:38238.065 0.50 127 98 941.551.55 257 252 53 10312.0 18.0 12:44242.7 0.54 130 100 961.671.65 254 256 56 10418.0 24.0 12:50248 0.50 129 101 951.551.50 254 256 57 10524.0 30.0 12:56251.88 0.50 128 102 961.551.50 255 254 56 10630.0 36.0 13:02256.399 0.50 126 102 961.551.55 256 256 56 10136.0 42.0 13:09260.62 0.49 126 102 961.521.50 256 256 57 10242.0 48.0 13:15265.099 0.58 125 101 961.801.80 257 256 58 10348.0 54.0 13:21269.564 0.55 127 102 971.701.70 255 256 57 10454.0 60.0 13:27274.40 0.59 132 103 971.831.80 248 256 57 10560.0 66.0 13:33279.099 0.55 131 103 971.701.70 256 257 58 10666.0 72.0 13:39283.85 0.52 134 104 981.611.60 254 258 56 1072.0 13:45288.545Average:54.880.53 127.8 101.2 96.01.641.62 254.7 253.6 56.8333333 10.0Leak Check

### EPA Method 1

STACK DIA. 37.25 7.568
Coupling lngth. 3.25

Traverse Points Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter

Traverse Points %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia "

on Diameter 2 4 6 8 10 12

1 14.6 8.7 6.7 5.7 4.4 4.9 3.2 4.4 2.6 4.2 2.1 4.0

2 85.4 35.1 25 12.6 14.6 8.7 10.5 7.2 8.2 6.3 6.7 5.7

3 75 31.2 29.6 14.3 19.4 10.5 14.6 8.7 11.8 7.6

4 93.3 38.0 70.4 29.5 32.3 15.3 22.6 11.7 17.7 9.8

5 85.4 35.1 67.7 28.5 34.2 16.0 25 12.6

6 95.6 38.9 80.6 33.3 65.8 27.8 35.6 16.5

7 89.5 36.6 77.4 32.1 64.4 27.2

8 96.8 39.3 85.4 35.1 75 31.2

9 DISTANCE DOWNSTREAM 330 > 91.8 37.4 82.3 33.9

10 DISTANCE UPSTREAM 104 97.4 39.5 88.2 36.1

11 DOWN STREAM DIA.= 8.859 93.3 38.0

12 UPSTREAM DIA.= 2.792 97.9 39.7

13

14 NUMBER OF POINTS BY % Dia points

15 DOWNSTREAM /UPSTREAM DIA. CEM points 16.7% 9.5

16 PARTICULATE VELOCITY 50.0% 21.9

17 <5-1.25=24 POINTS <6-1.5=16 POINTS 83.3% 34.3

18 <6-1.5=20 POINTS >6_1.5=12 POINTS If Dia.>2.4 meters than use

19 <7-1.75=16 POINTS 0.4, 1.2 ,2.0 meters

20 >7-1.75=12POINTS

21

22 RECTANGLULAR STACKS EQUIVALENT DIA. CALC. =(2LW)/(L+W)

23 LENGTH EQUIVALENT DIAMETER = #####

24 WIDTH

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

M1 Lake Shasta Melter

### Particulate Test Summary

**Client/Location.....................................**

**.. Lake Shasta Knauf**  **Reference Temp (F): 68** 

**Unit...............................................**

**.......... Melter** 
**Sample Location.......................................**

**. Stack**  **Data by: Bell** 

**Test No.............................................**

**.... 1-Vel/H2O**  **Average**

**Date...............................................**

**............ October 16, 2010**  *****
**Start/Stop Time.................................... 1232/1302**  *****
**Bar Press (in Hg).................................. 29.09**  *****

**Test Method..........................................**

**.. EPA 1,2,4**  *****
**Sample Time (Min)............................. 30**  *****
**Sample Train..........................................**

**. 6-WCS**  *****

**Meter Cal Factor.................................... 1.003**  *****

**Pitot Factor .........................................**

**. 0.84**  *****
**Nozzle Diam (in)...................................** *****
**Stack Area (sq ft).................................... 7.570** 
**Stack O2 (%).......................................... 20.6**  **20.60**
**Stack CO2 (%)..................................... 0.6**  **0.60**
**Stack Press (iwg).................................. -8.5**  **-8.50**
**Stack Temp (F).................................... 120.8**  **120.8**
**Vel Head (iwg)........................................**

**. 0.7486**  **0.7486**
**Meter Temp (F)..................................... 90.2**  **90.2**
**Meter Press (iwg)............................... 2.50**  **2.50**
**Meter Vol (acf)....................................... 28.477**  **28.477**
**Liquid Vol (ml).................................... 10.2**  **10.2**
**Std Sample Vol (SCF)......................................**

**...... 26.818**  **26.82**

**Moisture Fraction.......................................**

**....... 0.018**  **0.018**

**Stack Gas Mol Wt........................................**

**.......... 28.73**  **28.73**
**Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec)...................................**

**... 52.28**  **52.28**
**Isokinetic Ratio (%)....................................**

**........ #DIV/0!**  **#DIV/0!**
**Stack Flow Rate (wacfm)...................................**

**.... 23,748**  **23,748**
**Stack Flow Rate (dscfm)....................................**

**........ 20,171**  **20,171**
**O2 and CO2 estimated from 10/18/10 testing**

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

pre-test flow and moisture

### Melter
**dP (dP)^.5 dH Ts Tm**

**1 0.63 0.794 2.50 120 83 85**

**2 0.77 0.877 2.50 124 92 91**

**3 0.78 0.883 2.50 124 96 84**

**4 0.77 0.877 2.50 124 96 84**

**5 0.67 0.819 2.50 123 97 87**

**6 1.00 1.000 111 99 88**

**1 0.65 0.806 122**

**2 0.83 0.911 123**

**3 0.77 0.877 123**

**4 0.80 0.894 123**

**5 0.65 0.806 122**

**6 0.70 0.837 111**

**Average 0.7486 2.500 120.8 90.2**

**meter vol Imp Imp Gain**
**Stack Temp (F)** 120.8 **88.210 669.4 669.8 -0.4**
**Vel Head (iwg)** 0.7486 **116.687 594.1 592.8 1.3**
**Meter Temp (F)** 90.2 **556.9 556.8 0.1**
**Meter Press (iwg)** 2.50 **834.6 825.4 9.2**
**Meter Vol (acf)** 28.477
**Liquid Vol (ml)** 10.2 **28.477 Total**  **10.2**

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

pre flow data

# APPENDIX D
Equipment Calibration

Documents

# APPENDIX E
Laboratory Analytical
ReportsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight (mg)Run 192 2.2 ND 2.22.5Run 2100 1.9 ND 1.92.2Run 3902.60.302.62.9Blank98 ND NDRDL1 0.5 0.30Method 5 PM Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: October 19, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.17Shasta Lake, CAKnauf InsulationCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)FilterRDL(μg)R1Result(μg)R2Result(μg)R3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit (RDL)(μg)R1(μg)R2(μg)R3(μg)MDLusedAntimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.800.80 0.80 0.80<Arsenic 0.43 0.40 ND ND ND 0.800.80 0.80 0.80<Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Cadmium 0.17 0.10 ND 0.54 0.35 0.200.20 0.37 0.20<Chromium 0.82 0.30 3.05 2.23 2.89 0.602.23 1.41 2.07Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Lead 0.77 0.20 1.39 1.04 1.95 0.400.62 0.40 1.18Manganese ND 0.75 1.5 ND ND 1.51.5 1.5 1.5<Nickel 0.89 0.50 2.7 2.1 2.8 1.01.81 1.21 1.91Selenium ND 1.0 ND 2.1 8 2.02.0 2.1 8<CorrectedMethod 29 Lab ResultsSampling Date: October 19, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.17Shasta Lake, CAKnauf InsulationCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]Run 1790300ND 0.40.40Run 2700300ND 0.40.40Run 3660300ND0.30.30Blank H2O99 ND 0.05Blank KOH300 0.50 0.20Method 0061 Lab ResultsSampling Date: October 18, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.17Shasta Lake, CAKnauf InsulationVolume (mL)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)Run 1330NDND200200Run 2390NDND200200Run 3330NDND200200Blank H20100NDNDBlank H2SO4200 ND NDRDL200200CorrectedMethod 26A Lab ResultsKnauf InsulationShasta Lake, CABTEC job # 10-3990.17Sampling Date: October 18, 2010

### Site: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1907

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method
Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 2 8 3 H

V 0 2 8 4 H

V 0 2 8 5 H

V 0 2 8 6 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 2.2 1.9 2.6 0.5 2327448

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND 0.30 0.30 2328268

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 92 100 90 1 2328528

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H V 0 2 8 3 H

V 0 2 8 4 H

V 0 2 8 5 H

V 0 2 8 6 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.43 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.17 0.10 ND 0.54 0.35 0.20 2334727

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.82 0.30 3.05 2.23 2.89 0.60 2334727

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Lead (Pb) ug 0.77 0.20 1.39 1.04 1.95 0.40 2334727

Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 0.75 1.5 ND ND 1.5 2334727

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.89 0.50 2.7 2.1 2.8 1.0 2334727

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 ND 2.1 7.5 2.0 2334727

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0283 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0284 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0285 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0286 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0283-01R Normal

HV0284-01R Normal

HV0285-01R LFT

HV0286-01R Normal

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x or 5x dilution was required for all samples except HV0283, HV0397 and HV1280, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HV1281.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1907

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327448 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2334727 N_R Matrix Spike Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 4.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 0.3 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.9 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 0.4 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 0.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0.2 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1907

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2334727 N_R Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 0.7 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 0.07 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.63, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.65, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3
Twinsburg, OH 44087
Phone: (330) 405-0837
Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 1 (1 of 2)



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80492 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 944 0 10/18/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80442 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 979 0 20 10/18/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80478 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 366 0.2 10/18/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80473 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 391 0.4 20 10/18/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80485 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 244 0.5 10/18/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80428 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 253 0.2 20 10/18/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80495 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.6 0.5 Blank

80457 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 20 0.5 20 Blank

Variability +- 10% 

## Plant/Source 

# Knauf Shasta 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available 

## (248)-548-8072

### Site: LAKE SHASTA

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01

This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8439

Received: 2010/10/20, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method
Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439
Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 5 6 H O 1 6 5 7 Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M0061-10/18/10 RDL BLANK-KOH-M0061-10/18/10 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 99 1 300 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.05 0.5 0.2 2307267

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 5 8 H

O 1 6 5 9 H

O 1 6 6 0 Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18 2010/10/18

U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061-10/18/10 2-M0061-10/18/10 3-M0061-10/18/10

Volume ml 790 700 1 660 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND ND 0.4 ND 0.3 2307267

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439
Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1656 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1657 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1658 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID RUN 1-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1659 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID RUN 2-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1660 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID RUN 3-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439
Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA

GENERAL COMMENTS

Temperature of samples upon receipt >6°C.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #: Project name: LAKE SHASTA



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8439

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307267 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1609) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 106 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 105 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 5 of 5

### Site: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1937

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method
Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/18

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 4 1 5 H

V 0 4 1 6 H

V 0 4 1 7 H

V 0 4 1 7 H

V 0 4 1 8 Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A
Lab-Dup

Volume ml 100 200 330 390 1 2333975

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2333980

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2333980

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H V 0 4 1 9 Sampling Date 2010/10/19

COC Number N/A

U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 330 1 2333975

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND 200 2333980

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND 200 2333980

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0415 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0416 Collected 2010/10/18
Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0417 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0417 D u p Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0418 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0419 Collected 2010/10/19
Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst
Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937
Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1937

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2333980 A_S Matrix Spike

(HV0417) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 94 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 101 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 94 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 100 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD - Sample/Sample
Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5