alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Hizballah Operatives and Financial Facilitators in South America and Lebanon

# 									Designating Hizballah Operatives and Financial Facilitators in South America and Lebanon							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

September 12, 2023

The United States is today designating key Hizballah operatives and financiers operating a network in South America and Lebanon that generates revenue for Hizballah’s terrorist activities and provides cover for its presence in Latin America. Today’s action, taken in collaboration with partners in the U.S. government, including the Drug Enforcement Administration, underscores our commitment to pursuing the financiers, supporters and facilitators who sustain Hizballah’s ability to threaten the security, stability, and prosperity of Lebanon and the global financial system.  We will continue our efforts to root out networks that would abuse the U.S. and international financial systems to fund and engage in terrorism.

*The Department of the Treasury is designating this South America- and Lebanon-based network of family members, business associates, and companies under E.O. 13224, as amended, which targets terrorists, terrorist organizations, leaders, and officials of terrorist groups, and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism.  For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDrugsFinanceLebanonOffice of the SpokespersonSecurityTerrorism

Back to Top
#### W. Nelson RIVERS, Appellant, v. Peggie L. GOSSMAN et vir, Appellees.

No. 74-525.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Michael MAGEE, a minor, by and through his mother, natural guardian, and next friend, Margaret McGowan, and Margaret McGowan, Individually, Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Keith A. Reilly, and Modern Welding Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 78-592.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1979.

Larry Klein and Cone, Owen, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine, & Foster West Palm Beach, for appellees.

RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court which transferred the case from Palm Beach County to Glades County, Florida, upon ap-pellees’ Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer. This case is a personal injury action arising out of the alleged negligent operation of a boat by appellee, Keith A. Reilly, and owned by appellee, Modern Welding Company. Appellee, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, was joined as insurer. The complaint alleged that Reilly was a Florida resident, that Modern Welding Company was a Kentucky corporation, and that the accident occurred “. . . on the Rim Canal, approximately one mile east of Moore Haven, within the confines of the State of Florida . . .” The motion filed by appellees alleged that the accident occurred in Glades County, that Modern Welding Company was a foreign corporation which did not do business in Florida, nor did it have an office or place of business in Palm Beach County, and that Reilly was not a resident of Palm Beach County. The motion was unsworn and there were no affidavits or other proof sufficient to support the allegations of the motion. The election of venue is initially with the plaintiffs. Assuming the complaint does not affirmatively show that venue is lacking, the burden of pleading and proving improper venue is upon the defendants. The allegations of the unsworn motion to dismiss or to transfer were never established by sworn proof before the trial court. We reverse. *Davis v. Dempsey,*343 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Florida Forms, Inc. v. Barkett Computer Services, Inc.,*311 So.2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence,*243 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and BERANEK, J., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leroy WHITE.

No. 65046.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Leroy White, applying for writ of certiorari on writ of habeas corpus. St. Mary Parish. No. 41799.

Writ denied.

*656DIXON, J.,

would grant the writ. The trial judge misinformed defendant when he told him he would be eligible for parole from life sentence after *IOV2*years. (R.S. 15:571.7) See 15:571.7.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert W. McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     for the periods presented.

                                       /s/ Robert W. McMartin
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Robert W. McMartin
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                       November 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUTHSIDE
BANCSHARES CORP.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH DOCUMENT
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    158,630
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          61,595
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            61,316
<LOANS>                                        392,437
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 678,152
<DEPOSITS>                                     515,810
<SHORT-TERM>                                    39,403
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,224
<LONG-TERM>                                     54,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,985
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 678,152
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,652
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,468
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,048
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                43,168
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,894
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,263
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,905
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,909
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,909
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,203
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,695
<LOANS-PAST>                                       221
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    369
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,192
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      670
<RECOVERIES>                                       263
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,830
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,830
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Janet P. Spitler, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


| |     |                                                                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Janet P. Spitler                                                             
| |     | Janet P. Spitler
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
Principal Accounting Officer
| |     |                                                                                  
| |     | November 5, 2010                                                                 
| |     | Date
40812.

#### COLUMBIA-SOUTHERN CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. DICKENS.

Decided September 9, 1964.

*Alston, Miller & Gaines, Martin H. Peabody, Ronald L. Reid,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Charles E. Watkins, Jr.,*contra.

Pannell, Judge.

A special demurrer to a paragraph of the petition relating to the measure of damages was overruled. After verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant brought the case to this court by bill of exceptions assigning error on the overruling of the special demurrer as controlling the verdict and judgment. There is no brief of the evidence in the record. A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in *Whitner v. Whitner,*207 Ga. 97 (60 SE2d 464), the brief of the evidence is necessary for a consideration of a’ writ of error assigning error on an order overruling a special demurrer, and under such circumstances the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed and the writ of error should not be dismissed on motion. See in this connection, *Morrow v. American Tire Co.,*106 Ga. App. 788 (3) (128 SE2d 342).

The motion to dismiss the writ of error is overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
#### Robert D. DUNLAP, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 74-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 29, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Peruvian Foreign Minister Gervasi

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Peruvian Foreign Minister Gervasi							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 1, 2023

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Peruvian Foreign Minister Ana Cecilia Gervasi yesterday in Washington, DC.  Deputy Secretary Sherman expressed U.S. support for Peru and President Boluarte, and her efforts to affirm Peru’s democracy, ensuring peace, stability, and the unity of the Peruvian people.  Deputy Secretary Sherman encouraged the government to continue taking steps to hold those responsible for acts of violence accountable.

The United States is committed to helping Peru strengthen its democratic institutions and working with the Organization of American States, the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, and regional partners to protect human rights and support stability in Peru.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonPeru

Back to Top
# C_2005296EN.01002102.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 October 2005 — Rasmussen v Commission

(Case T-203/03) (1)

1

(Officials - False statements concerning mission expenses - Disciplinary proceedings - Reprimand - Rules on languages - Medical confidentiality)

(2005/C 296/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Lars Bo Rasmussen (Hellerup, Denmark) (represented by: G. Bouneou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris and subsequently by V. Joris and M. Patkova, Agents)

Defendant(s):

:

Application for

(i) annulment of the Commission's decision of 1 July 2002 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary measure of a reprimand for false statements concerning mission expenses, (ii) restitution of amounts recovered pursuant to Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and (iii) compensation for the non-material damage allegedly sustained

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the applicant to bear his own costs and half of the costs incurred by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the applicant to bear his own costs and half of the costs incurred by the Commission;

| 3) | Orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000727069
<NAME>                        PS PARTNERS II, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US
                                 
<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                         1
<CASH>                                                          1,388,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      57,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1,445,000
<PP&E>                                                         90,065,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (36,782,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 54,951,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,175,000
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     38,701,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   54,951,000
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               11,550,000
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   4,517,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                2,724,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 3,071,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             3,071,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    3,071,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       20.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       20.97
        

</TABLE>
§ 417.480 Maintenance of records: Cost HMOs and CMPs. A reasonable cost contract must provide that the HMO or CMP agrees to maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence of accounting procedures and practices that— ( a ) Are sufficient to— ( 1 ) Ensure an audit trail; and
( 2 ) Properly reflect all direct and indirect costs claimed to have been incurred under the contract; and
( b ) Include at least records of the following: ( 1 ) Ownership, HMO or CMP, and operation of the HMO's or CMP's financial, medical, and other recordkeeping systems.
( 2 ) Financial statements for the current contract period and three prior periods.
( 3 ) Federal income tax or information returns for the current contract period and three prior periods.
( 4 ) Asset acquisition, lease, sale, or other action.
( 5 ) Agreements, contracts, and subcontracts.
( 6 ) Franchise, marketing, and management agreements.
( 7 ) Schedules of charges for the HMO's or CMP's fee-for-service patients.
( 8 ) Matters pertaining to costs of operations.
( 9 ) Amounts of income received by source and payment.
( 10 ) Cash flow statements.
( 11 ) Any financial reports filed with other Federal programs or State authorities.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45680, Sept. 1, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.56 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-62,029] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on November 19, 2007, applicable to workers of Foxcroft Sportswear, Fall River, Massachusetts. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69710).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of women's apparel. 

New information shows that in August 2007, Foxcroft Sportswear was purchased by Sara Campbell, Ltd and is currently known as Sara Campbell, Ltd. 

Accordingly, the certification is being amended to include workers at Foxcroft Sportswear, Fall River, Massachusetts, whose wages are reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for the successor firm, Sara Campbell, Ltd. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,029 is hereby issued as follows: 
      ( print page 5866)    
All workers of Foxcroft Sportswear, currently known as Sara Campbell, Ltd, Fall River, Massachusetts, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 21, 2006 through November 19, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of January 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-2133 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P