alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# p. 1



# RECEIVED

OPPT CE3IC



# 2OItoy 12 111111: 07 

# at Enst

Sincerely, DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023



# October 31, 2014

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Re: EPA — HQ — OPPT — 2003 - 0012

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal — Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

September 2014 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division: CBIC Control Number 

# 362575

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samplq taken at internal outfall DSN662A in September 2014.4In accordance with

the current site NJPICES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), the& results are

provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The

enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this

monitoring period.

Amu a Jeyarajasingam

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment

DuPont Chambers Works

AJ/cic

Enclosures

# Copy to:



# / Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Water Surfacing

Mail Code 401-02B

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 420

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 p. 2

# P. 3ug/L =microgramsperLiter662-GRAB9/29/14 

# 0 0 .,—1969PFOA=PerfluorooctanoicAcidSampleswereanalyzedbyCritical PathServicesLLC.Reborted resultsrepresentasingleanalysis,exceptforthesamplecollected on9/1/14.IAcceptableprecisionwasobtained and thereported resultforthesamrcollected on9/1/14representstheaverageoflabduplicateresults.1TheNJDEP labcertificationnumberforCritical Path ServicesLLC isPAU;662-GRAB11171.2Z/6 

# 0 0 ,—1L•91.ug/L =microgramsperliterorpartsperbillion(ppb)662-GRABIli4/91.16 

# 0 0 1—I[5.9LOQ =limitof quantification=0.100ug/L 1662-GRAB19/8/141 

# 0 0 ,—1L99662-GRAB111714146 

# 0 0 1—L817'SampleIDIIowaTop(ft)IBottom(ft)IDuplicate#1



# 0

I—I(a) •ssia 

# I—rim-7F1/6n



# .aucieuvl 

# LI0-<and ND =Nondetectatstated reportinglimit
#### Sam MORRISON and Norman Shearin, Jr., Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. The Honorable Joseph CARROLL, Superintendent, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-958.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Ellen M. CONNER, Individually, and Ellen M. Conner as Administratrix of the Estate of Don Conner, Appellants, v. Eileen A. JOHNSON et al., Appellees.

No. 73-573.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         861,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,725,584<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,578,809<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,725,584<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,509<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               155,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivable, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $6,790,604 and net deferred leasing commissions of
$32,520.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilties of $146,775.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
<F4>Total revenues include rent of $232,388 and interest and other revenue of
$14,121.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 314

To provide for monthly reporting of child support obligations to certain

consumer reporting agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for monthly reporting of child support obligations

to certain consumer reporting agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Support Credit

5 Bureau Reporting Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 314 IH

1 SEC. 2. MONTHLY REPORTING TO CERTAIN CONSUMER RE2 PORTING AGENCIES OF CHILD SUPPORT OB3 LIGATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 466(a)(7) of the Social

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 666(a)(7)) is amended to read

6 as follows:

7 ‘‘(7)(A)(i) Procedures which require the State

8 agency to provide to each qualified consumer report9 ing agency, on a monthly basis, such information

10 (and in such form and in such manner) as the Sec11 retary shall require by regulation with respect to any

12 child support obligation owed by an absent parent to

13 any person being provided services under the State

14 plan approved under this part, except that informa15 tion with respect to overdue support payable shall be

16 made available under such procedures only after—

17 ‘‘(I) the State agency has transmitted to

18 the absent parent notice that the information is

19 to be so provided;

20 ‘‘(II) the absent parent has been given a

21 reasonable opportunity to contest the accuracy

22 of the information; and

23 ‘‘(III) full compliance with all procedural

24 due process requirements of the State.

25 ‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not be construed to require

26 the provision of more than 1 notice to an absent
3

•HR 314 IH

1 parent with respect to child support payable by the

2 absent parent pursuant to a child support order.

3 ‘‘(B) As used in subparagraph (A), the term

4 ‘qualified consumer reporting agency’ means—

5 ‘‘(i) each consumer reporting agency (as

6 defined in section 603(f) of the Fair Credit Re7 porting Act) that is a major reporting agency

8 (as determined by the Secretary in regulations);

9 and

10 ‘‘(ii) at the option of the State, any other

11 consumer reporting agency (as so defined).’’.

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—Within 6 months after the date

13 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and

14 Human Services shall prescribe such regulations as may

15 be necessary to carry out the amendment made by sub16 section (a).

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 subsection (a) shall take effect 12 months after the date

19 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Minnie O’Rourke, Respondent, *v.*Simon Feist, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, tenth district.

Benjamin Steinhardt, for appellant.

John M. Lathrop, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The case of Berg v. Parsons, 156 N. Y. 109, is not an authority adverse to the conclusions arrived at in the case of Randolph v. Feist, 23 Misc. Rep. 650, which we consider controls the disposition of the case at bar.

The facts on which the former case rests are quite different from those in Randolph v. Feist and in the present case, and the remarks of the judge, giving the opinion of the majority of the Court of Appeals, on which counsel for the appellant lays stress, are mere dicta unnecessary.to the decision of the case.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>



                       DESCRIPTION OF CHIRON CORPORATION'S
                1997 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS VARIABLE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Decisions on compensation (base salary and variable compensation) of Chiron
Corporation's ("Chiron" or the "Company") executive officers are made by the
five-member Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

For 1997, the Compensation Committee continued the Company's approach that base
salaries for executive officers should be measured by reference to the median
(50th percentile) of salaries for benchmark positions in comparator companies.
Further, the Compensation Committee provided that a significant portion of total
cash compensation (salary plus variable compensation) in the form of annual
variable cash compensation potential should be "at risk", dependent upon
individual, business unit and overall Company performance.  Variable cash
compensation for executive officers overall was targeted to yield total cash
compensation at the 50% percentile, but with the opportunity up to the 75%
percentile, of total cash compensation as shown by comparative data.

The Compensation Committee based its decisions regarding variable
compensation using the Company's Annual Incentive Plan as a guide.  The
Annual Incentive Plan, which covers eligible employees in designated salary
grades, rewards performance against pre-established performance metrics
developed at the Company, business unit and functional or corporate unit
level.   Below the level of executive officer, there is also a component of
individual performance.

Variable compensation for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is based
100% on the performance of the Company, as measured against the
pre-established Company metrics composed of financial objectives and business
innovation milestones.

The Business Unit Presidents are eligible for variable compensation based on
the pre-established Company metrics and on the achievement of their specific
pre-established business unit metrics.

Executive officers responsible for major functional or corporate units are
eligible for variable compensation based on the pre-established Company
metrics and on the achievement of their specific functional or corporate unit
metrics.
§ 416.1 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* ( 1 ) Section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Act provides for Medicare Part B coverage of facility services furnished in connection with surgical procedures specified by the Secretary under section 1833(i)(1) of the Act.
( 2 ) Section 1833(i)(1)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to specify the surgical procedures that can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis in an ambulatory surgical center.
( 3 ) Sections 1833(i)(2)(A) and (D) and 1833(a)(1)(G) of the Act specify the amounts to be paid for facility services furnished in connection with the specified surgical procedures when they are performed in an ASC.
( 4 ) Section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act provides that if the Secretary has not updated amounts for ASC facility services furnished during a fiscal year through 2005 or a calendar year beginning with 2006, the amounts shall be increased by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers as estimated by the Secretary for the 12-month period ending with the midpoint of the year involved, except that, in fiscal year 2005, the last quarter of calendar year 2005, and each of the calendar years 2006 through 2009, the increase shall be zero percent.
( 5 ) Section 1833(i)(2)(E) of the Act provides that, with respect to surgical procedures furnished on or after January 1, 2007, and before the effective date of the implementation of a revised payment system, the payment amount shall be the lesser of the ASC payment rate established under section 1833(i)(2)(A) of the Act or the prospective payment rate for hospital outpatient department services established under section 1833(t)(3)(D) of the Act. The lesser payment amount shall be determined prior to application of any geographic adjustment.
( b ) *Scope.* This part sets forth— ( 1 ) The conditions that an ASC must meet in order to participate in the Medicare program;
( 2 ) The scope of covered services; and
( 3 ) The conditions for Medicare payment for facility services.
[56 FR 8843, Mar. 1, 1991; 56 FR 23022, May 20, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 68226, Nov. 24, 2006]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3260

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to proposed

regulation of pharmacists.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 17, 1996

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

relating to proposed regulation of pharmacists.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pharmacist’s Patients

5 Protection Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING OF REGULATION.

7 The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is amend8 ed by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 3260 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 906. FUNDING.

2 ‘‘None of the funds appropriated or made available

3 to the Food and Drug Administration may be used to im4 plement the proposed regulation ‘‘The Prescription Drug

5 Product Medication Guide Requirements (August 24,

6 1995).’’.

Æ
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              EZ DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

     The undersigned,  in order to form a corporation pursuant to the provisions
of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware,  hereby  certifies as
follows:

     1. The name of the corporation is EZ Data Systems, Inc.

     2. The  address of its  registered  office in the State of  Delaware is 100
West Tenth Street, in the City of Wilmington,  County of New Castle. The name of
its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

     3. The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted are:


          To engage in any lawful act or activity for which  corporations may be
          organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

     4. The total number of shares which the corporation shall have authority to
issue is 10,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.01 per share.

     5. The name and mailing address of the incorporator is as follows:

         Name                           Mailing Address
         ----                           ----------------
         Stephen L. Pritchard           c/o Herrick & Smith
                                        100 Federal Street, 29th Floor
                                        Boston, Massachusetts  02110

     6. The name and address of the person who is to serve as director until the
first annual  meeting of  stockholders  or until his  successors are elected and
qualified is as follows:

         Name                            Mailing Address
         ----                            ---------------
         James E. Cook                   c/o E Z Data, Inc.
                                         Newington Industrial Park
                                         Newington, New Hampshire  03801

     The Bylaws of the  corporation  may be amended,  altered or repealed by the
Board of  Directors  at any  regular  or special  meeting or by written  consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the General  Corporation Law of Delaware,  and may
be amended by the  stockholders  at any annual or special  meeting or by written
consent pursuant to Section 228 of said General Corporation Law.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has signed this certificate this 15th
day of July, 1982.

                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Stephen L. Pritchard
# C_2006074EN.01003501.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/35

---

Action brought on 3 February 2006 — Tolios and Others v Court of Auditors

(Case F-8/06)

(2006/C 74/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Iraklis Tolios (Paris, France), François Muller (Strasbourg, France) and Odette Perron (La Rochelle, France) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare the action admissible and well founded, including the objection of illegality contained therein; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action admissible and well founded, including the objection of illegality contained therein;

| — | in consequence, annul the applicants' pension slips for March 2005, the effect of which will be to apply a weighting at the level of the capital of their country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting capable of adequately reflecting the differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and therefore consistent with the principle of equivalence; |
| --- | --- |

—

in consequence, annul the applicants' pension slips for March 2005, the effect of which will be to apply a weighting at the level of the capital of their country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting capable of adequately reflecting the differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and therefore consistent with the principle of equivalence;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants in the present case are all officials who retired before 1 May 2004. They contest the transitional regime put in place, pending the abolition of weightings, by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities (1), in so far as that regime is based on new ‘pension’ weightings which are no longer calculated by reference to the capital but according to the average cost of living in the Member State in which the pensioner shows that he has established his principal residence.

1

In support of their claims, the applicants maintain, first of all, that the regulation is based on incorrect reasoning, in so far as neither the deepened integration of the Community, nor freedom of movement and residence, nor the difficulty in monitoring the actual place of residence of pensioners can serve as a basis for the transitional regime in question.

The applicants further maintain that there has been a breach in the present case of the principles of equal treatment, legal certainty, the retroactivity of acquired rights and the protection of legitimate expectations.

---

(1)  OJEU 2004 L 124 of 27.04.2004, p. 1.

1

---
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Pesticide Programs 

Biopesticides and Pollution 

Prevention Division (7511P) 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: 

.1L Registration 

Reregistration 

(under FIFRA, as amended) 

Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): 

EPA Reg. Number: Date of Issuance: 

89600-2 

NOV 1 2 2014 

Term of Issuance: Unconditional 

Name of Pesticide Product: 

Bioceres 

Anatis Bioprotection Inc. 

278, rang Saint-Andre, St.-Jacques-le-Mineur 

Quebec, JOJ lZO, Canada 

Technology Sciences Group, Inc. 

712 Fifth St., Suite A 

Davis, CA 95616 

On the basis of information furnished by the registrant. the above named pesticide is hereby regist.ered/reregistered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. 

This registration does not eliminate the need for continual reassessment of the pesticide. If EPA 

determines, at any time, that additional data are required to maintain in effect an existing 

registration, the Agency will require submission of such data under section 3( c )(2)(B) of FIFRA. 

This product is registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(5) and is subject to the following 

terms and conditions: 

I. Submit/cite all data required for registration ofyour product under FIFRA section 3(c)(5) 

when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data. 

2. Revise the EPA Reg. No. entry to read, "89600-2" on the final printed label. 

3. Submit two (2) copies of the revised final printed labeling before you release the product for 

shipment. Refer to the A-79 enclosure for a further description of final printed labeling. 

Failure to comply with these terms will subject the registration to cancellation, in accordance with 

FIFRA sec. 6. Your release for shipment of the product constitutes acceptance of these terms. 

A stamped copy of the label is enclosed for your records. 

Date: 

Sig"'N~:A~Of~ ~ . Robert~cNally, Director 

Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division 

EPA Form 8570-6