alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 (the Report)

fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                     

|      |                |  |                                    
|----- | -------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: | April 12, 2007 |  | /s/ Dennis J. Curtin               
|      |                |  |                                    
|      |                |  | Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice      
|      |                |  | President - Chief Financial Officer

|-56-
|----
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.1052 Oral and written summation.

The parties to a hearing are allowed a reasonable time to present oral summation and to file briefs or other written statements of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Copies of any briefs or other written statements must be sent in accordance with 422.1016.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.758 Collection of civil money penalties imposed by CMS. ( a ) When an MA organization does not request a hearing, CMS initiates collection of the civil money penalty following the expiration of the timeframe for requesting an ALJ hearing as specified in subpart T of this part.
( b ) If an MA organization requests a hearing and CMS' decision to impose a civil money penalty is upheld, CMS may initiate collection of the civil money penalty once the administrative decision is final.
[72 FR 68726, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### Frank CLARK, III, Appellant, v. Stephanie M. CLARK, Appellee.

No. 74-1277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
- Office Home
- Key Topics

HomeDirect Line for American Business...Direct Line for American Business: Upcoming and Past Events

# 						Direct Line for American Business: Upcoming and Past Events					

							With 96 percent of global consumers living outside the United States, exports are a great way to increase jobs and income here at home. Successful exporting requires accurate and up-to-the minute information on opportunities and market conditions abroad. The Direct Line program provides a unique opportunity for American businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, to engage directly via webcast with U.S. Ambassadors overseas.						

		Subscribe		

27 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAlgeriaAndorraBahrainBotswanaCabo VerdeChileColombiaDenmarkEgyptFijiGreenlandHong KongItalyKazakhstanKyrgyzstanLatviaMaltaPanamaSan MarinoSloveniaTajikistanTunisiaUzbekistan

Select a Release TypeDirect Line Event

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsCounselor of the Department

          -    Direct Line Event  		Opportunity for Lithium Extraction and Value Chain Development in Chile	  May 14, 2024 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Business Opportunities in Cybersecurity and Cloud Computing in Tunisia	  May 6, 2024 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Critical Minerals and Mining Equipment in Kazakhstan	  March 21, 2024 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan	  February 27, 2024 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Business Opportunities in Malta’s Offshore Renewable Energy Sector	  January 17, 2024 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Emerging Technology Opportunities in Slovenia	  October 24, 2023 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Critical Minerals in Botswana	  October 17, 2023 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Cabo Verde’s Emerging Technology Sector	  July 21, 2023 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Colombian Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) For Infrastructure	  June 5, 2023 
          -    Direct Line Event  		Hydropower Opportunities in Greenland	  April 26, 2023 

123next page

Back to Top
§ 421.201 Performance criteria and standards. ( a ) *Application of performance criteria and standards.* As part of the carrier evaluations mandated by section 1842(b)(2) of the Act, CMS periodically assesses the performance of carriers in their Medicare operations using performance criteria and standards. ( 1 ) The criteria measure and evaluate carrier performance of functional responsibilities such as— ( i ) Accurate and timely payment determinations;
( ii ) Responsiveness to beneficiary, physician, and supplier concerns; and
( iii ) Proper management of administrative funds.
( 2 ) The standards evaluate the specific requirements of each functional responsibility or criterion.
( b ) *Basis for criteria and standards.* CMS bases the performance criteria and standards on— ( 1 ) Nationwide carrier experience;
( 2 ) Changes in carrier operations due to fiscal constraints; and
( 3 ) CMS's objectives in achieving better performance.
( c ) *Publication of criteria and standards.* Before the beginning of each evaluation period, which usually coincides with the Federal fiscal year period of October 1-September 30, CMS publishes the performance criteria and standards as a notice in the Federal Register. CMS may not necessarily publish the criteria and standards every year. CMS interprets the statutory phrase “before the beginning of each evaluation period” as allowing publication of the criteria and standards after the Federal fiscal year begins, as long as the evaluation period of the carriers for the new criteria and standards begins after the publication of the notice.
[59 FR 682, Jan. 6, 1994]
# C_2005281EN.01000902.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Innsbruck by order of that court of 22 June 2005 in Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v Land Tirol

(Case C-339/05)

(2005/C 281/17)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Landesgericht Innsbruck (Austria) of 22 June 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 September 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols and Land Tirol on the following question:

Must a Member State or one of a Member State's regional or local authorities take account, when calculating the remuneration of contractual public servants, of periods of employment in certain institutions in Switzerland, which are comparable to institutions listed in Paragraph 41(2) of the Tiroler Landesvertragsbedienstetengesetz (Law of the Province of Tyrol on Contractual Public Servants) (or, in the alternative, of Paragraph 26(2) of the Vertragsbedienstetengesetz 1948 (Federal Law on Contractual Public Servants of 1948)) without temporal limitation, or is the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons (OJ 2002 L 114), in particular Article 9(1) of Annex I thereto, rather to be interpreted as meaning that it is permissible to take account only of periods of employment by contractual public servants in Switzerland after the entry into force of that agreement on 1 June 2002?

without temporal limitation

to take account only

after the entry into force

---
§ 412.44 Medical review requirements: Admissions and quality review. Beginning on November 15, 1984, a hospital must have an agreement with a QIO to have the QIO review, on an ongoing basis, the following: ( a ) The medical necessity, reasonableness and appropriateness of hospital admissions and discharges.
( b ) The medical necessity, reasonableness and appropriateness of inpatient hospital care for which additional payment is sought under the outlier provisions of §§ 412.82 and 412.84 of this chapter.
( c ) The validity of the hospital's diagnostic and procedural information.
( d ) The completeness, adequacy, and quality of the services furnished in the hospital.
( e ) Other medical or other practices with respect to beneficiaries or billing for services furnished to beneficiaries.
[50 FR 15326, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 35689, Sept. 3, 1985; 50 FR 41886, Oct. 16, 1985]
1 The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 99-1629EM

_____________ Dionne P. Maide, * * On Appeal from the United Appellant, * States District Court * for the Eastern District v. * of Missouri. * First Bank/First Services, * [Not to be Published] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 1, 1999 Filed: September 13, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DionneMaide appeals from the District Court’s 1 order dismissing her action without prejudice for failure to comply with the District Court’s orders. After careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion, and that an extended opinion is not warranted.-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimization of Air-Breathing Engine ConceptThe design optimization of air-breathing propulsion engine concepts has been accomplished by soft-coupling the NASA Engine Performance Program (NEPP) analyzer with the NASA Lewis multidisciplinary optimization tool COMETBOARDS. Engine problems, with their associated design variables and constraints, were cast as nonlinear optimization problems with thrust as the merit function. Because of the large number of mission points in the flight envelope, the diversity of constraint types, and the overall distortion of the design space; the most reliable optimization algorithm available in COMETBOARDS, when used by itself, could not produce satisfactory, feasible, optimum solutions. However, COMETBOARDS' unique features-which include a cascade strategy, variable and constraint formulations, and scaling devised especially for difficult multidisciplinary applications-successfully optimized the performance of subsonic and supersonic engine concepts. Even when started from different design points, the combined COMETBOARDS and NEPP results converged to the same global optimum solution. This reliable and robust design tool eliminates manual intervention in the design of air-breathing propulsion engines and eases the cycle analysis procedures. It is also much easier to use than other codes, which is an added benefit. This paper describes COMETBOARDS and its cascade strategy and illustrates the capabilities of the combined design tool through the optimization of a high-bypass- turbofan wave-rotor-topped subsonic engine and a mixed-flow-turbofan supersonic engine.Document ID19960047100Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPatnaik, Surya N.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Cleveland, OH United States)*Lavelle, Thomas M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Hopkins, Dale A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107303NAS 1.15:107303E-10227-3Accession Number96N32874Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047100.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Claude Franklin MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. R-435, R-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2006086EN.01002301.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/23

---

Action brought on 27 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-113/06)

(2006/C 86/45)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by J. Hottiaux and F Simonetti, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/57/EC of 23 April 2004 on the identification of pyrotechnic articles and certain ammunition for the purposes of Council Directive 93/158/EEC on the harmonisation of the provisions relating to the placing on the market and supervision of explosives for civil uses, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/57/EC of 23 April 2004 on the identification of pyrotechnic articles and certain ammunition for the purposes of Council Directive 93/158/EEC on the harmonisation of the provisions relating to the placing on the market and supervision of explosives for civil uses, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2004/57/EC expired on 31 December 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 127, p. 73.

1

---
H. R. 3249

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to develop domestic

technological capabilities for the recovery of minerals from the Nation’s seabed,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 2(a) of the

Mining and Mineral Resources Research Institute Act of 1984 (30

U.S.C. 1222(a)) is amended by adding the following at the end

thereof:

‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not more

than $1,800,000 for each of the fiscal years after fiscal year 1996

to be made available by the Secretary to an institute or institutes

experienced in investigating the continental shelf regions of the

United States, the deep seabed and near shore environments of

islands, and the Arctic and cold water regions as a source for

nonfuel minerals. Such funds are to be used by the institute or

institutes to assist in developing domestic technological capabilities

required for the location of, and the efficient and environmentally

sound recovery of, minerals (other than oil and gas) from the

Nation’s shallow and deep seabed.’’.

(b) SHORT TITLE.—Section 11 of such Act (30 U.S.C. 1201 note)

is amended to read as follows:
H. R. 3249—2

‘‘SEC. 11. SHORT TITLE.

‘‘This Act may be cited as the ‘Mining and Mineral Resources

Institutes Act’.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
HomeBelize

# Belize

70 items

        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at a Joint Press Availability with Belize Foreign Minister Fonseca	  Uzra ZeyaFebruary 25, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Jamaica and Belize	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to Belize	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to Belize and Costa Rica	  January 17, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Belize National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 20, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Belize	  September 19, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Belize	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Belizean Foreign Minister Eamon Courtenay Opening Remarks at the Anniversary Ministerial of the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 23, 2023World BankWashington, DC 

123…7next page

Back to Top
HomeGlobal Social Media Presence...Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs

# 									Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs							

## 								Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Social Media Sites							

        - Afghanistan
        - Bangladesh
        - India
        - Kazakhstan
        - Kyrgyzstan
        - Nepal
        - Pakistan
        - Sri Lanka
        - Tajikistan
        - Turkmenistan
        - United States
        - Uzbekistan

Tags

Bureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Events at the Embassy of Mexico in Ecuador

# 									Events at the Embassy of Mexico in Ecuador							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

April 6, 2024

The United States condemns any violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and takes very seriously the obligation of host countries under international law to respect the inviolability of diplomatic missions.

Mexico and Ecuador are crucial partners of the United States, and we place a high value on our relations with both countries.  We encourage the two countries to resolve their differences in accord with international norms.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEcuadorInternational LawMexicoOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727010
<NAME>                        Elexsys International Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                2,422
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        13,020
<ALLOWANCES>                            453
<INVENTORY>                           7,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     23,329
<PP&E>                               73,052
<DEPRECIATION>                       53,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       44,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                14,485
<BONDS>                              13,485
<COMMON>                              9,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                            7,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         44,162
<SALES>                              28,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     28,911
<CGS>                                23,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        23,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         (5)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,029
<INCOME-TAX>                             19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,010
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.21
        


</TABLE>
#### Vincent D. KOSTREBA and Eleanor A. Kostreba, Appellants, v. Randolph S. COX and Ann M. Cox, Appellees.

No. 73-883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Al ABRAMS, Petitioner, v. ALCO REFRIGERATION CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. 46315.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 14, 1975.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.