alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         291,773
<SECURITIES>                                   771,461
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,715
<INVENTORY>                                    120,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,256,586
<PP&E>                                       1,417,663
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,051,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,676,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,768
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,523,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,676,546
<SALES>                                        844,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               872,998
<CGS>                                          561,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,234,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (361,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (361,091)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)


</TABLE>
# C_2006044EN.01001201.xml

| 22.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3918 — Doughty Hanson/Moeller)

(2006/C 44/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3918. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3918. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0239

SAT Date: 2/5/2013

Print Date: 3/4/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

2 1 1

1 1 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

 

Keywords:

 Keywords: UNCERT-IRR, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0239

FATE: Estimations for 

log Kow = 1.90 (E)

log Koc = 2.32 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.92 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.95 (E)

FATE: Estimations for 

log Kow = -0.44 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Koc = 1.00 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)

PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life = hr-da

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via hydrolysis and/or sorption; then 

 Hyd Pdt 0; Hyd Pdt 90 via biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo; 

 Hyd Pdt wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt low; Hyd Pdt low

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1; Hyd Pdt P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt rapid; 

 Hyd Pdt rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. Expect fairly slow hydrolysis of . There is uncertain concern for irritation 

which is dependant on the actual rate of hydrolysis. Low moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.334 or *

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.061

green algal 96-h EC50 0.022

fish _ chronic value 0.005

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.008

algal _ chronic 

value

0.01

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR 

chemical class = ; MW 478; S = 556 mg/L (P); log Kow = 5.7 (EPI); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the report on form 10QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such report on form 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         462,875
<SECURITIES>                                 1,156,765
<RECEIVABLES>                                  931,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    332,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,277,510
<PP&E>                                       2,759,906        
<DEPRECIATION>                                 995,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,412,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,934,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           814
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,967,563  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,412,489
<SALES>                                      3,064,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,159,629  
<CGS>                                        1,050,884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,092,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,072,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (458,628)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,613,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,613,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3, 2015

d0223 

# Order

Clerk March 3, 2015

149297(33)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149297

COA: 319050

Kalamazoo CC: 1997

- 000230

- FC

WILLIAM HALL

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 5,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does n ot appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA** No 

### . DA 22 

### - 0487

**____________________________** DUANE BENDER and REBECCA ESTATES, LLC, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STACEY ROSMAN and JOHN DOES 1 - 10, Defendants and Appellees 

### .

______________________________________________________________ **ORDER GRANTING APPELLEE AND APPELLANT’S STIPULATION**  **AND MOTION TO HOLD TIME REQUIREMENTS IN ABEYANCE**

**__________________________________________________________________** 

### APPEARANCES: Dennison A . 

### Butler P.O. Box 152 23 

### N . 

### Broadway , Suite 205 

### Red Lodge , MT 

### 59068 Phone: (406) 366 - 4826 dennisonabutler@gmail.com Attorney 

### for Appellants Duane Bender and Rebecca Estates, LLC David F. Knobel P.O. Box 2529 Billings, MT 59103 Phone: (406) 255 - 7343 dknobel@crowleyfleck.com Attorney for Appellee Stacey Rosman 01/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0487Before the Court is Appellee Stacey Rosman an d Appellants Duane Bender

and Rebeca Estate, LLC’s Mont. R. App. P. 7 stipulation and motion to hold time require me nts in abeyance. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the parties may conduct appellate mediation on February 9, 2023, with Greg Mur phy serving as m ediator, an d Mr. Rosman ’s response brief shall be due within 30 days of the filing of the mediator’s report.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2023
# C_2006036EN.01002202.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal d'instance de Saintes by judgment of that court of 16 November 2005 in Max Rampion and Marie-Jeanne Rampion (née Godard) v Franfinance SA and K par K SAS

(Case C-429/05)

(2006/C 36/45)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the tribunal d'instance de Saintes of 16 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 2 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Max Rampion and Marie-Jeanne Rampion (née Godard) and Franfinance SA and K par K SAS on the following questions:

| 1. | Are Articles 11 and 14 of Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 (1) to be interpreted as allowing courts to apply the rules on interdependence between a credit agreement and a contract for the supply of goods or services that is financed by that credit in cases where the credit agreement does not refer to the goods being financed or has been concluded in the form of a credit facility without reference to the goods being financed? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 11 and 14 of Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 (1) to be interpreted as allowing courts to apply the rules on interdependence between a credit agreement and a contract for the supply of goods or services that is financed by that credit in cases where the credit agreement does not refer to the goods being financed or has been concluded in the form of a credit facility without reference to the goods being financed?

1

| 2. | Does Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 have an objective which extends beyond consumer protection alone to the organisation of the market and allows courts to apply of their own motion the provisions which flow from it? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 have an objective which extends beyond consumer protection alone to the organisation of the market and allows courts to apply of their own motion the provisions which flow from it?

---

(1)  Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit (OJ 1987 L 42, p. 48).

1

---
# C_2006086EN.01003201.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/32

---

Action brought on 23 January 2006 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM

(Case T-18/06)

(2006/C 86/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by J.-C. Gaedertz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 17 November 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 17 November 2005;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Alles, was uns verbindet’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 — Application No 3 648 441

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94, since the mark applied for is distinctive in respect of the designated goods and services and is not of a descriptive nature, because the combination of words is unusual and uncommon in relation to the goods and services claimed.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Santiago GARCIA, Individually, et al., Appellants, v. L. C. MORRIS, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1975.

Sheldon Yavitz, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court from an adverse summary judgment in an action for negligence.

The judgment at issue in this case involves only the defendant L. C. Morris, Inc., a subcontractor engaged to perform excavation and drainage in connection with certain road repairs on W. 9th Street and W. 2nd Avenue, in the City of Hialeah.

Summarized, the plaintiffs’ complaint charged that a stop sign controlling the northbound traffic on W. 2nd Avenue was down, and the defendant was negligent in replacing or re-erecting the sign.

We have examined the facts of this case as set forth in the plaintiffs’ brief, and it is our conclusion that the trial judge was correct in determining that there is no genuine issue of material fact.

We think this case is closely analogous to the facts in Dickerson, Inc. v. Buckley, *546Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 570, in which it was held no duty existed on the defendant’s part to maintain a city stop sign in place, absent some showing that the defendant caused the sign to be removed.

Therefore, for the reasons stated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 29, 2009, (74 FR 19598), Siemens Healthcare 
Diagnostics Inc., Attn: RA, 100 GBC Drive, Mail Stop 514, Newark, 
Delaware 19702, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to produce the listed controlled substances in 
bulk to be used in the manufacture of reagents and drug calibrator/
controls which are DEA exempt products.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. to manufacture the listed basic 
classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest 
at this time. DEA has investigated Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 
to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public 
interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the 
company's physical security systems, verification of the company's 
compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's 
background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed.

    Dated: August 28, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21531 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
SCWC-12-0000578 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. MANAIAKALANI N.K. KALUA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000578; 3DTC-11-040282) ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Wilson, J.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court filed on January 15, 2019, is corrected as follows:

The attorney credits for petitioner on page 28 shall be revised to read as follows: John M. Tonaki Tyler I. Gomes (Jon N. Ikenaga on the briefs) for Petitioner

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 22, 2019.

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Associate Justice Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000578 22-JAN-2019 11:31 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew P.
Savadelis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                         /s/ Andrew P. Savadelis
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Andrew P. Savadelis
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer and
                                         Chief Accounting Officer)
                                         October 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006063EN.01003702.xml

| 16.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/37

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4140 — TCCC/CCHBC/FRESH)

(2006/C 63/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4140. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4140. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 418.30 Change of the designated hospice. ( a ) An individual or representative may change, once in each election period, the designation of the particular hospice from which hospice care will be received.
( b ) The change of the designated hospice is not a revocation of the election for the period in which it is made.
( c ) To change the designation of hospice programs, the individual or representative must file, with the hospice from which care has been received and with the newly designated hospice, a statement that includes the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the hospice from which the individual has received care and the name of the hospice from which he or she plans to receive care.
( 2 ) The date the change is to be effective.