alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3265 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3265

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                       wage rate under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 1996

  Mr. Quinn (for himself, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
     Gilman, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Horn, Mr. Houghton, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. 
 Torkildsen, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Leach, Mr. Martini, Mr. 
   Lazio of New York, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Diaz-
    Balart, Mr. Riggs, Mr. Cremeans, Mr. LaTourette, and Mr. Blute) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                 Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                       wage rate under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minimum Wage Increase Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MINIMUM WAGE.

    Paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) except as otherwise provided in this section, not 
        less than $4.25 an hour during the period ending 90 days after 
        the date of the enactment of the Minimum Wage Increase Act of 
        1996, not less than $4.75 an hour during the year beginning on 
        that date, and not less than $5.25 an hour after the expiration 
        of such year;''.
                                 <all>
```
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
AAM-11-024-E Nov 08 2010

Exemption No. 10158 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1083

Mr. Jared L. Watkins Heli Xpress, LLC 100 Wyman Court Winston-Salem, NC 27106

Dear Mr.Watkins:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 22, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Heli Xpress, LLC (Heli Xpress) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Heli Xpress, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Heli Xpress.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Heli Xpress, LLC, an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Heli Xpress, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Heli Xpress are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Heli Xpress part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Christopher P. Schnittker,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based
upon my knowledge:

     (1)  The Reportfully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                    /s/ Christopher P. Schnittker
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated:   May 10, 2006               Christopher P. Schnittker, Senior Vice
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# Before the United States Department of Transportation 

# Washington, DC March 19, 2010

Essential Air Service at: McCOOK, NEBRASKA Docket OST-1997-3005 under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq.

Questions and comments may be referred to: Michael Matthews Chief Financial Officer Great Lakes Airlines 1022 Airport Parkway Cheyenne, WY 82001 (307) 432-7030 This document contains Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.'s response to Order Requesting Proposals 2010-2-4.

Great Lakes' proposal contemplates non-stop, conveniently timed connecting services to our code-share partners (United and Frontier) at our Denver Hub. In addition, Great Lakes maintains interline ticketing and baggage agreements with the majority of the other carriers serving Denver, including interline e-ticketing agreements with U.S. Airways and Continental Airlines. All of which will offer the McCook passenger maxium access to the domestic and international air transportation system. The proposed service is submitted without any upline scheduling restrictions and contemplates the use of pressurized 19 seat Beechcraft 1900D airliner equipment. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide essential air transportation at McCook, NE.

# Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at 

## McCook, Nebraska to Denver Two Round Trips - B1900 98.0% completion factor Departures: 1,227 Block Hours: 1,268 Revenue Passenger Miles: 981,000 Available Seat Miles: 5,082,234 Operating Revenues: Passenger: MCK 4,500 psgrs at $87.21 $392,445

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) $2,433 Total Operating Revenues: $394,878 Operating Expenses: Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance $338,710 Fuel and Oil $652,898 Flying Operations $208,294 Maintenance $333,713 Total Direct Expenses: $1,533,615 Total Indirect Expenses: $553,692 Total Operating Expenses: $2,087,308 Operating Loss ($1,692,430) Profit Element (5.0% of Total Operating Expenses) $104,365 Annual Compensation Requirement: $1,796,795 Representative Schedule Block Flt # Freq Flow Schedule Time Miles ASMS Equip 5142 123456 MCK-DEN 0745-0748 63 218 4142 BE1 5081 123456 DEN-MCK 1330-1531 61 218 4142 BE1 5081 12345.7 MCK-DEN 1541-1544 63 218 4142 BE1 5103 12345.7 DEN-MCK 1859-2051 61 218 4142 BE1 No Upline scheduling restrictions
<PAGE>


                                  [LETTERHEAD]


December 31, 1999

Novartis Corporation                        VIA FACSIMILE AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
564 Morris Avenue
Summit, NJ 07901

Attn:    Jeff Benjamin
         Vice President and
           Associate General Counsel

Gentlemen:

This letter confirms the agreement between Chiron Corporation ("Chiron") on
behalf of itself and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Chiron SpA, on the one hand,
and Novartis Corporation ("Novartis") to amend that certain Limited Liability
Company Agreement between them, dated as of December 28, 1995, as amended (the
"LLC Agreement") in certain respects. Terms not defined in this letter shall
have the meaning set forth in the LLC Agreement.

1.       SECTION 2.3.1 OF THE LLC AGREEMENT shall be amended to extend the date
         through which Chiron may sell Units of Membership Interest to Novartis
         from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2000, without thereby extending
         the period within which R&D Costs may be included within the Net
         Purchased Amount.

2.       SECTION 2.3.3. OF THE LLC AGREEMENT shall be amended to replace
         subsection (e) with the following:

         "(e) in 1999, Fifty million three hundred thousand dollars (US
         $50,300,000) plus any unused portion of the funding limit for 1998
         which unused portion amounts to Eight million dollars (US $8,000,000);
         and
         (f) in 2000, any unused portion of the funding limit for 1999, but
         in no event more than Nineteen million three hundred thousand dollars
         (US $19,300,000) so that the total funding amount does not exceed Two
         hundred sixty five million dollars (US $265,000,000)."

<PAGE>

If the foregoing accurately reflects our understanding effective as of the date
of this letter, please sign and return one copy to me.

Very truly yours,                             AGREED:

CHIRON CORPORATION                            NOVARTIS CORPORATION




/s/ William G. Green
By: William G. Green                       By: /s/ Jeff Benjamin
    Senior Vice President and                 --------------------------
      General Counsel
                                           Title: Vice President & Associate
                                                  General Counsel
                                                 ----------------------------

cc:      Herbert Gut
         Joseph Mamie
# C_2005271EN.01000702.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 15 September 2005

in Case C-58/04 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof: Antje Köhler v Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Nord (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Place of taxable transactions - Supplies of goods effected on board cruise ships - Transport effected within the Community - Exclusion of tax where a stop is made in a third territory - Scope of the exclusion)

(2005/C 271/13)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-58/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), made by decision of 23 October 2003, received at the Court on 11 February 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Antje Köhler and Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Nord — the Court (First Chamber) composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and E. Levits, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General, M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, gave a judgment on 15 September 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Stops made by a ship in the ports of a third country during which passengers may leave the ship, even for a short period, are 'stops in a third territory' within the meaning of Article 8(1)(c) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 77/388/EEC and introducing simplification measures with regard to value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30. 04. 2004.

1

---
HomeTuvalu

# Tuvalu

30 items

        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Tuvalu	  June 23, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tuvalu	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tuvalu	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Tuvalu National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tuvalu	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tuvalu	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL – Promoting Investigative Journalism and Anti-Corruption Efforts in Pacific Island Countries	  February 16, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Tuvalu (20-1028) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  October 28, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tuvalu	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tuvalu	  March 11, 2020 

previous page123next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)
  The
undersigned, as the chief financial officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies,
to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB
Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
purpose.
 
 Dated
this 17th day of March, 2008.
  
 /s/DonaldJ.Torbert,JrDonald J. Torbert,
      Jr.Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 578.305 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
- DipNote Home
- About
- All Posts
- Browse by Topic

HomeDipNote...DipNote: Science, Technology, and Innovation

# 						DipNote: Science, Technology, and Innovation					

		Subscribe		

23 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerJennifer R. LittlejohnMarcia S.  BernicatMonica MedinaRamin Toloui

Select a LocationBangladeshCosta RicaIndiaIndonesiaKazakhstanPalauPortugalSwedenSwitzerlandUnited KingdomUnited States

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Economic Prosperity and Trade PolicyDipNote: EnergyDipNote: Science, Technology, and Innovation

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of the Science and Technology AdviserUnder Secretary for Management

          -    DipNote  		Cities on a Hill: Reflections on the Inaugural Cities Summit of the Americas	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnMay 5, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Our OES 2023 New Year’s Resolutions	  Monica MedinaJanuary 13, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Celebrating the Winners of the 2022 Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence	  Ramin TolouiDecember 12, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		Setting a North Star to Combat Plastic Pollution	  Monica MedinaDecember 7, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		Celebrating Two Years of the Artemis Accords	  October 13, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		Space for All: Using Diplomacy to Bridge the Space Divide	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnOctober 7, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		The Action We Are Taking for the Future of the Planet	  Monica MedinaOctober 3, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		The Big Blue Pacific Continent Is a Force	  Monica MedinaJuly 17, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		A Look at the Global Environmental Movement: What If?	  Monica MedinaJune 8, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		Seaing the Future at the UN Ocean Conference 2022	  Monica MedinaJune 2, 2022 

123next page

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputerized Design and Analysis of Face-Milled, Uniform Tooth Height Spiral Bevel Gear DrivesFace-milled spiral bevel gears with uniform tooth height are considered. An approach is proposed for the design of low noise and localized bearing contact of such gears. The approach is based on the mismatch of contacting surfaces and permits two types of bearing contact either directed longitudinally or across the surface to be obtained. A Tooth Contact Analysis (TCA) computer program was developed. This analysis was used to determine the influence of misalignment on meshing and contact of the spiral bevel gears. A numerical example that illustrates the developed theory is provided.Document ID19970019381Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLitvin, Faydor L.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Wang, Anngwo*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Handschuh, R. F.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberARL-TR-1251NAS 1.15:107348AD-A318127E-10499NASA-TM-107348Meeting InformationMeeting: Power Transmission and GearingLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 6, 1996End Date: October 9, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N21109Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A4-7ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsTRANSMISSION GEARSCOMPUTER AIDED DESIGNAvailable DownloadsNameType19970019381.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 137.375 Are Tribally-owned facilities constructed under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8] eligible for replacement, maintenance, and improvement funds on the same basis as if title to such property were vested in the United States?

Yes, Tribally-owned facilities constructed under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8] are eligible for replacement, maintenance, and improvement funds on the same basis as if title to such property were vested in the United States.
Request for Information Dewmas Holdings, Inc. (FAA-2015-3064) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Nori Yoshima: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3064). 

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:13 AM 

To: nori@dewmas.com 

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 17, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking
#### Felio CRUZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 20, 1979.

Felio Cruz, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*672Before HENDRY, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors of Trans Financial, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
33-40606,   33-60844,   33-56761,  33-64601  and  333-06089  on  Form  S-3,  and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-21517,  33-43046,  33-53960,  33-72492, 33-65347,
33-65349,  333-18359, and 333-45883 on Form S-8 of Trans Financial,  Inc. of our
report dated January 20, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of
Trans Financial,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1997,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Trans Financial, Inc.

                                                      /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Louisville, Kentucky
March 3, 1998