alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Maurice Stransky, Appellant, *v.*Nathan Weichman et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of Special Term, opening a default.

Epstein Brothers (Jesse S. Epstein, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles I. Schampain, for respondents.

Olcott, J.

When this matter was before the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, that tribunal, in reversing a former order of this court which was found to be erroneous in some of its provisions, gave permission to the defendant Weichman, upon payment of the costs and disbursements awarded against him, to renew his application to the Special Term of this court to open the default taken against him and for an extension of time within which to make a certain surrender.

In-pijrsuance of such permission, said defendant paid such costs and disbursements to the amount of $158.50, and made such application to our Special Term, and the justice there presiding granted said application in the exercise of that discretion which the Appellate Term held was vested in him.

This appeal is "taken by the plaintiff from the order so granted.

Counsel for the appellant furnishes a forcible argument against the authority of this court to grant the extension of time for malting the said surrender; but the decision of the Appellate Term, in giving the permission above noted, seems to have passed upon that objection and disapproved it.

He also objects to the omission of costs to his client in the order now appealed from, but'our learned Special Term justice appears *768to have been guided in this regard, within the exercise of his discretion, by the fact that the defendant has already paid to the plaintiff the above-mentioned large bill of costs.

• The fear of counsel for the appellant that this client will, unless the order in question be reversed, be remediless because of the loss of the original undertaking, is dispelled by the offer contained in respondent’s points X, XIY (which offer may be' considered to have the same sanction and force as though made in open court), that a copy of the undertaking may be used during the pendency and upon the trial of this cause in place of the original.

Counsel for the appellant further contends that- at the time of the rendition of judgment, there was in reality no default, but a consent to judgment, given in open court. •

The evidence is conflicting upon this point, but here again we feel precluded from a consideration of the appellant’s argument by the opinion of the Appellate Term, which, after an examination of the whole record, found that there had been a default and referred the question of opening it to- this court.

We have not overlooked, that" portion of the opinion of the Appellate Term which suggests that certain matters which bear against the defendant’s prayer for relief *“*are at least deserving of weighty consideration,” but there is nothing before us to suggest that they did not receive such consideration in our court below.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs to the respondents, to abide the event.

Conlan, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs to respondents, to abide event.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Cronin, Claire D – Ireland – July 2021

# 									Cronin, Claire D – Ireland – July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Ireland

CANDIDATE:     Claire D. Cronin

Claire Cronin currently serves as a Representative, and as Majority Leader, in the legislature of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. During her service as a legislator, Ms. Cronin was also Vice Chair, and then Chair, of the Committee on the Judiciary. As Chair of the Committee Ms. Cronin was the architect of difficult and controversial pieces of legislation, including major criminal justice reform and police reform. Ms. Cronin has also served since 2003 as a Mediator/Arbitrator for Commonwealth Mediation in Brockton, MA, a role that has honed her consensus building skills and her ability to listen to the concerns of others. Those skills, coupled with Ms. Cronin’s keen understanding of the challenges of governance, her demonstrated ability to address complex policy issues and her effectiveness in building coalitions representing diverse communities make her well-qualified to serve as Ambassador to Ireland.

Prior to her election as Representative, Ms. Cronin maintained the Law Office of Claire Cronin in Brockton, Massachusetts.  Earlier she was first a law clerk, and then an Associate Attorney at Wynn & Wynn, P.C. in Raynham, Massachusetts.  Before that she worked in Liaison and Constituent Services in the Office of Massachusetts Governor, Edward King.  She is as a member of the Brockton Chapter of the N.A.A.C.P and of The Charity Guild and was on the Board of the Foundation for Excellence in Education in Easton. She also served on the Massachusetts Democratic State Committee and the Easton Democratic Town Committee.

Ms. Cronin earned her B.A. from Stonehill College and her J.D. degree from Suffolk University.  She is the recipient of multiple honors and awards including the Jewish Community Relations Council Legislative Leadership Award (2020) and the Emerge Massachusetts 2020 Woman of the Year.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 23
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors of EnergyNorth, Inc.:
                                
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-58127 of our reports dated November 4, 1998,
included in EnergyNorth, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 1998, and to all references to our firm included in
this registration statement.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 22, 1998
# C_2006060EN.01003303.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-121/05 P (1)

1

(2006/C 60/69)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 14 December 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-121/05 P: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Deutsche Post EURO EXPRESS GmbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.06.2005.

1

---
# C_2005235EN.01000101.xml

| 23.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 September 2005

(2005/C 235/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2224 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67870 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5534 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,99 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9556 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5730 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,455 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9105 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5502 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,48 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6370 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5909 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4244 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4857 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7506 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0533 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7558 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8869 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4448 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 499,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,608 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,668 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,163 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2224

JPY

Japanese yen

135,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67870

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5534

ISK

Iceland króna

74,99

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9556

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5730

CZK

Czech koruna

29,455

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9105

RON

Romanian leu

3,5502

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,48

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,499

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6370

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5909

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4244

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4857

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7506

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0533

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,82

ZAR

South African rand

7,7558

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8869

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4448

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 499,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,608

PHP

Philippine peso

68,668

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6560

THB

Thai baht

50,163

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
exv10wxwy







Exhibit 10(w)




Wells Fargo & Company Chairman / CEO Post-Retirement Policy




For a period of two years following the date of retirement of a management Chairman of the Board of
Wells Fargo & Company or CEO of Wells Fargo & Company who was elected on or after January 1, 2005,
the Company, if approved by the Human Resources Committee, may provide the retired Chairman or CEO
with an office, an administrative assistant and part-time driver at the Company’s expense. The
benefits provided under this Post-Retirement Policy are conditioned upon the retired Chairman or
CEO continuing to be available for consultation with management and to represent the Company with
customers, the community and team members during the two year period. The monthly fair market
value of the use of the office, the services provided by the administrative assistant and the
services provided by the driver will be taxable to the retired Chairman or CEO each calendar year
according to the Internal Revenue Code and IRS rules as calculated by the Company. In the event
the retired Chairman or CEO dies during the time that the Chairman or CEO is covered under this
Post-Retirement Policy, all benefits provided under the Post-Retirement Policy will cease.
# C_2006096EN.01004001.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/40

---

(2006/C 96/62)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 86, 8.4.2006

OJ C 86, 8.4.2006

Past publications

OJ C 74, 25.3.2006

OJ C 60, 11.3.2006

OJ C 48, 25.2.2006

OJ C 36, 11.2.2006

OJ C 22, 28.1.2006

OJ C 10, 14.1.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

************************************ 

Federal Aviation Administration * 

* 

Complainant * 

v. * 

RECEIVED 

MAR- 4 2013 

HEA~~NG DOCKET 

* FAA Docket No. CP09S000003 

Robert Zeige, * 

* FAA 2009-0182 

Respondent * 

* FAA Case No. 2009S0700030 

* 

************************************* 

Judge [Unassigned] 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Complainant will be represented in the 

referenced matter by: 

Deitrick H. Johnson, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320-0631 

Respectfully submitted this :;2-S day of February, 2013. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance has been mailed by Certified Mail 

to the following locations: 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2Wl000 

Wilbur Wright Building 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Robert Zeige 

4140 Clemmons Road 

Suite 370 

Clemmons, NC 27012 

Dated 

(original+ l copy) 

(l copy)
# C_2006060EN.01003204.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/32

---

Removal from the register of Case C-468/04 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/65)

(Language of the case: Greek)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 15 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-468/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18.12.2004.

1

---
Summary of Meeting between the URS Corporation, the Federal Stormwater Association, and Small 

Business Advocacy

September 10, 2014

List of Attendees

Deborah Nagle, EPA

Connie Bosma, EPA

Marr Ellen Levine, EPA

Peter Ford, EPA

Erika Farris, EPA

Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA

Sharon Cooperstein, EPA

Emily Ashton, ORISE

Jack Waggener, URS Corporation

Kevin Bromberg, Small Business Administration (SBA)

Jeff Longsworth, Barnes & Thornburg for Federal Stormwater Association

Andy Bollman, Alpine GeoPhysics (on phone)

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, Jeff Longsworth from the Federal Stormwater Association summarized similar

concerns raised during the June 6, 2014 meeting on the benchmark monitoring requirements in the 

MSGP. Results from further analyses conducted by URS were presented. The analyses compared MSGP 

benchmark monitoring data to data from the National Stormwater Quality Database (NSQD). For several 

parameters, the analyses noted the “nonindustrial” NSQD 95th percentile concentration, and double the 

95

th percentile concentration, on a figure displaying the cumulative percentage distribution for the 

MSGP annual average benchmark concentration values. It was recommended that EPA consider 

changes to the benchmark monitoring requirements, such as eliminating the requirements, or increasing 

the concentrations to be double the 95th percentile of the NSQD values.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. NO. 32,429 4 SEAN HOGAN, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 7 John F. Davis, District Judge 8 Gina R. Manfredi 9 Rio Rancho, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Kimberly A. Middlebrooks 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 WECHSLER, Judge. 162 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for th e reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________________________________ 6 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_________________________________ 9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 12
# C_2005330EN.01000301.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 20 October 2005

in Case C-334/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 90/388/EEC - Telecommunications - Article 4d - Rights of way - Lack of a guarantee of non-discrimination in the grant of rights of way - Non-transposition)

(2005/C 330/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-334/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Alves Vieira, S. Rating and G. Braga da Cruz) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes and P. de Pitta e Cunha) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 30 July 2003 — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, N. Colneric (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 October 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Portuguese Republic

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to ensure the transposition of Article 4d of Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications services, as amended by Commission Directive 96/19/EC of 13 March 1996, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to ensure the transposition of Article 4d of Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications services, as amended by Commission Directive 96/19/EC of 13 March 1996, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, de 18.10.2003.

1

---
# C_2005318EN.01000601.xml

| 14.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4024 — Cinven/Frans Bonhomme)

(2005/C 318/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4024. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4024. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT
18














CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Utah
Medical Products, Inc.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-24781, 33-44100, 33-89394, and 33-89434 of Utah Medical Products, Inc. on
Forms S-8 of our financial statement audit report and internal control over
financial reporting audit report dated February 20, 2008, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Utah Medical Products, Inc. for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.











/s/
Jones Simkins, P.C.





JONES
SIMKINS, P.C.


Logan,
Utah


February
20, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50121

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS NOVA-RIVERA, also known as Jose Luis Rivera-Garcia

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1769-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, JoseLuis Nova-Rivera raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Benjamin W. BROWN, a/k/a Benjamin William Brown, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1146.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 9, 1981.

*1263Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert E. Adler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Benjamin W. Brown appeals from a judgment adjudicating him guilty of three counts of uttering a false, forged, or altered check and concurrent sentences of five years probation on each count.

We have considered appellant’s three points on appeal and find no reversible error demonstrated under any of said points. However, we deem it appropriate to address appellant’s contention in Point Three that one of the conditions of his probation was unconstitutionally vague and unrelated to rehabilitation. Condition Number Nine required appellant to “Stay away from bars.”

The record reflects that appellant has a lengthy history of varied involvement in crime, including association with drug dealers. During prior probationary periods he was often unemployed and was considered to be generally lazy by his probation officer. Apparently, the trial judge felt hanging around bars with the associations often found there was not conducive to appellant’s rehabilitation and to the protection of the public from future criminal activity in which appellant might, as a result, become involved.

A condition of probation should reasonably relate to the offense involved, the rehabilitation of the defendant, or the protection of the public. *Dearth v. State,*390 So.2d 108 (Fla.App.1980). We hold that the condition complained of, which was imposed by the veteran trial judge, fulfills the purposes of probation conditions as set forth in *Dearth, supra.*It is not unconstitutionally vague. The average person would understand the meaning of the admonition, “Stay away from bars.”

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.