alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                         761,380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,650,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                   308,869
<INVENTORY>                                    549,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,155,126
<PP&E>                                      28,236,195
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,918,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,945,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,907,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,341
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,866,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,945,030
<SALES>                                     49,797,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,090,297
<CGS>                                       17,226,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,834,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,036,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (100,022)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,881,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,881,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,881,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.65)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 4 - 6 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997, AND AS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,463,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  385,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,000
<INVENTORY>                                    279,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,249,167
<PP&E>                                       7,368,487
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,894,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,000,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,089,910
<BONDS>                                      7,720,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           43,500
<PREFERRED>                                    268,538
<COMMON>                                         7,404
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,245,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,000,851
<SALES>                                      1,540,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,032,443
<CGS>                                          881,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,091,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             263,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (306,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (306,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                190,930
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7717

LARRY BLAKNEY, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

SLED; HARTSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03071-FL) 

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Larry Blakney, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7717 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint 

counsel, denying his motion for injunctive relief, and dismissing his amended civil action 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blakney v. SLED, 

No. 5:21-ct-03071-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2021). We deny Blakney’s motions to 

disqualify or recuse the district court judge and to certify class action and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7717 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
LIMITATION OF INDEMNITY ON ACCOUNT OF AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Walter L. Klein, H. George Sickles and Joseph D. Klein, Executors of the Estate of Samuel Klein, Deceased, v. The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, of London, England.*

Decided, February 4, 1918.

*Liability Insurance*— 'Construction *of Provision in Policy Covering Accident in the Use of an Automobile.*

Tbe limitation of liability on tbe part of tbe defendant insurance company, under tbe policy issued by it indemnifying tbe plaintiff bolder against bodily injuries suffered by any person >or persons by reason of tbe maintenance or use by bim of a certain automobile, is limited to five thousand dollars.

*Kramer &■ Bettman,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Worthington, Strong & Stettinius,*contra.

*

 Affirming *Klein et al*v. *Employers’ Liability Co.,*19 N.P.(N.S,), 426,

By the Court.

The policy upon which this action is based indemnifies plaintiffs “against loss from the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries, including death resulting therefrom, accidentally suffered by any person or persons by means of the maintenance or use” of a certain automobile, within certain limits of time'and place, subject to certain conditions among which is.:

> *176“Condition A. The corporation’s liability on account of an accident resulting in such injuries to one person, including death, is limited to five thousand dollars ($5,000), and subject to the same limit for each person; the corporation’s total liability on account of any one accident resulting in injuries to more than one person, including death, is limited to ten thousand dollars ($10,000).”

By reason of bodily injuries to Jennie Goldstein damages have ■been recovered and paid to her and also to her husband, Daniel Goldstein. It is conceded by defendant that it is bound to indemnify plaintiffs for both these recoveries, subject to the limitation expressed in the policy. The only question to be determined is whether the limit of liability is five thousand or ten thousand dollars.

We hold that this limit is five thousand dollars.

This is clearly fixed by the first clause of Condition A: “ The corporation’s liability on account of an accident resulting in such injuries to one person, including death, is limited to five thousand dollars.” This clause by the use of the word *“such”*injuries refers only to *bodily*injuries, and limits the indemnity, no matter how many may recover because of such injury, since, as in this case,* more than one person may claim and secure damages for bodily injuries to the one person.

The latter part of Condition. A, which increases the limit where more than one person is injured as a result of any one accident, is distinctly stated to be “subject to the. same limit for each person” — that is, to the five thousand dollar limit for each 'person receiving bodily injuries.

We are in accord with the opinion of Judge May in the trial court, as found in 19 N.P.(N.S), 426.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, P. J., and Hamilton, J., concur; Gorman, J., not participating.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-084-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
HomeTrinidad and Tobago

# Trinidad and Tobago

83 items

        -    TIAS  		Trinidad and Tobago (99-1129.1) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  November 29, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Trinidad and Tobago (99-1129) – Treaty on Extradition	  November 29, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Trinidad and Tobago (96-1226.1) – Treaty Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment	  December 26, 1996 

previous page1…789

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Events in Gabon

# 									Events in Gabon							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 30, 2023

The United States is deeply concerned by evolving events in Gabon.  We remain strongly opposed to military seizures or unconstitutional transfers of power.  We urge those responsible to release and ensure the safety of members of government and their families and to preserve civilian rule.  In addition, we call on all actors to show restraint and respect for human rights and to address their concerns peacefully through dialogue following the announcement of election results.  We also note with concern the lack of transparency and reports of irregularities surrounding the election.  The United States stands with the people of Gabon.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGabonOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### Philip Toole, Plaintiff, *v.*Oneida County, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Oneida Special Term,

July, 1898.)

Voluntary payment of taxes on property purchased with pension money — Taxable margin. <

A voluntary payment of taxes cannot be recovered upon the ground that the property taxed was purchased with pension money where the evidence , clearly indicates that, over and above such moneys, there was a margin which was taxable.

*219Action to have declared void an assessment upon plaintiff’s lands and to recover back the taxes paid upon said assessments, upon the ground that said premises were purchased with pension moneys.

George C. Carter, for plaintiff.

J. K. O’Connor, for defendant.

Hiscock, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to have declared void the assessment made upon twenty-four acres of land owned by him during each of the years 1891, b> 1895, inclusive, at a valuation of $550, and upon a house and lot owned by him, during the years 1893 and 1894, at a valuation of $600, and to recover back the taxes paid upon said assessments aggregating in the neighborhood of $25. Upon the trial plaintiff’s counsel withdrew that part of his prayer for relief which asked to have the assessments declared null and void leaving the action to stand simply for the recovery of said taxes.

The ground upon which plaintiff, asks this relief is that the premises in question were purchased with pension moneys. No other fault, irregularity or lack of jurisdiction is alleged against the assessments in question than the one just mentioned. So far as appears, plaintiff never appeared before the board of assessors, or in any manner took occasion to protest against or have corrected the assessments in question and there is no evidence whatever to show that his payment of taxes was anything but voluntary.

It seems to be clearly established that plaintiff did invest in . each of the pieces of land some pension money, but the evidence not only does not indicate that there was not any margin'of value in the land over and above the pension moneys so invested, but on the other hand it is quite clear that there was such margin.

Under these circumstances and in accordance with the decisions cited in Ernenwein v. Oneida County, ante, pi 216, it seems that plaintiff must fail.

■ Judgment is, therefore, ordered for the defendant, with costs.

Judgment for defendant, with costs.
H. R. 2988

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that traffic signal synchronization projects

are exempt from certain requirements of Environmental Protection Agency Rules.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECTS.

Section 176(c)(4) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)(4)) of the Clean Air Act

is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:

‘‘(D) Compliance with the rules of the Administrator for determining the conformity of transportation plans, programs, and

projects funded or approved under title 23 of the United States

Code or the Federal Transit Act to State or Federal implementation

plans shall not be required for traffic signal synchronization projects

prior to the funding, approval or implementation of such projects.

The supporting regional emissions analysis for any conformity determination made with respect to a transportation plan, program,

or project shall consider the effect on emissions of any such project

funded, approved, or implemented prior to the conformity determination.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 228
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3029

                          [Report No. 104-588]

 To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of 
  Columbia, as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1996

 Mr. Davis (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                              May 21, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of 
  Columbia, as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse located at 3rd Street and Constitution 
Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be 
designated and known as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``E. Barrett 
Prettyman United States Courthouse''.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 228

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3029

                          [Report No. 104-588]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of 
  Columbia, as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 21, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Note 12
                           Related Party Transactions

     The Company  entered into a two-year  agreement on May 20, 1997,  to employ
its new President and Chief Operating Officer. Under the terms of the agreement,
the Company  agreed to  reimburse  the  officer  for legal costs in  defending a
lawsuit from the officer's former  employer.  The case was settled and the total
cost to the Company was charged to compensation expense in 1997.
     Watermark originally entered into a republishing and distribution agreement
with  a UK  company  (the  Distributor)  which  provided  the  Distributor  with
exclusive  distribution rights of Watermark's  products in defined  territories.
The Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Distributor  is the brother of Watermark's
then President and Chief Executive  Officer.  During 1995,  Watermark elected to
purchase  the  portion  of  the   Distributor's   business  related  to  selling
Watermark's  products at a negotiated  price of $2.5 million that is included in
merger and other costs in 1995.
# Serbia

120 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Serbia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Countering Corruption and Russian Malign Influence in the Western Balkans	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Belgrade, Serbia: International School of Belgrade: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 3, 2023	  Vedant PatelOctober 3, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 2, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 2, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Serbian President Vucic	  September 29, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 27, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 27, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 25, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 25, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Condemnation of Violent Attacks on Kosovo Police	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 

previous page1234…12next page

Back to Top
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3215

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal

tracting or trading with Indians.the provision relating to Federal employees con-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3215

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating to Federal employees contracting or trading

with Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3215 EH

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING OR

2 TRADING WITH INDIANS.

3 (a) REPEAL.—Section 437 of title 18, United States

4 Code, is repealed.

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec6 tions at the beginning of chapter 23 of title 18, United

7 States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to

8 section 437.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub10 section (a) shall—

11 (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this

12 Act; and

13 (2) apply with respect to any contract obtained,

14 and any purchase or sale occurring, on or after the

15 date of enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
GoToWebinar

First Name State martha CA Amy MI Peggy CT 

Attendee Report

GeneratedAug 13, 2012 11:18 AM PDT

General Information

Webinar NameActual Start Date/TimeClicked Registration LinkTotal Attended

Session Details

Attended Last NameYes sandyYes TerhaarYes Geimer
s WA 

Deshira NC Brenda DC Brenda TX Lloyd VA Pamela MN Beth NC Amy CA 

Yes sYes WallaceYes FoosYes ReyesYes Kolbe*If an attendee left and rejoined the session, the In Session Duration column only includes their first visit.Yes ShubatNo Hassett-SippleNo Kyle
```

[114th Congress Public Law 171]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 425]]

Public Law 114-171
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Daryle 
Holloway Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 13, 2016 -  [H.R. 3082]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DARYLE HOLLOWAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Daryle Holloway Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Daryle 
Holloway Post Office Building''.

    Approved June 13, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3082:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Mar. 1, considered and passed House.
            May 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```