alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Willie James JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AB-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

*1159Michael Allen, Public Defender, Nancy A. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snur-kowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

The appellant contends in part that his sentencing by a substitute judge was improper in the absence of any showing of necessity therefor, and that he was improperly adjudicated guilty of twc counts of aggravated assault. We agree that the trial judge erred in these respects and reverse.

Appellant was tried by Judge Wayne M. Carlisle on an information charging one count of attempted robbery, one count of aggravated assault, one count of aggravated battery, one count of burglary, and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was sentenced by Judge R. A. Green, Jr., on one count of attempted robbery, two counts of aggravated battery, and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

There is merit in appellant’s contention that he was improperly sentenced by Judge Green instead of by Judge Carlisle, who conducted the trial. The record reflects no unusual or exigent circumstances necessitating sentencing by anyone other than the trial judge. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing under the guidelines set forth in *Lawley v. State,*377 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The court also improperly sentenced the appellant on two counts of aggravated battery instead of one count of aggravated assault and one count of aggravated battery. At resentencing, the trial judge should correct these errors in the judgment and sentence and should determine how much, if any, credit the appellant should receive for jail time served prior to sentencing.

It is also contended that the trial judge erred in respect to certain evidentiary rulings and in finding that the aggravated assault and aggravated battery committed by the appellant were not category IV lesser included offenses of the attempted robbery. Although proof of an assault is a necessary element of proof of the attempted robbery charge, the appellant in this case was guilty of two additional separate and distinct assaults against the victim and his wife. These additional distinct assaults are a proper basis for the aggravated assault and aggravated battery convictions and sentences and do not, under the circumstances of this case, constitute lesser included offenses of the attempted robbery. We find no error in the evidentiary rulings of the trial court.

Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded with instructions.

MILLS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### Robert TRAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. KK-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 5, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Charles J. Kahn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*871Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Travis pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of escape, reserving his right to appeal and to urge that the trial court erroneously denied his motion for discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(b)(1). We hold the motion for discharge should have been granted and, accordingly, we reverse Travis’ conviction.

Travis was confined in a state correctional institution until his escape on June 5, 1977. On June 8, 1977, Travis was arrested as an escapee. An information charging escape was filed March 28, 1978. Travis filed his motion for discharge June 9, 1978 alleging he had been continuously available for trial since his arrest on June 8, 1977. At the hearing on Travis’ motion, the State argued that since the state attorney had not been aware of Travis’ recapture until shortly before the time the information was filed, the speedy trial period did not commence until the information charging escape was filed. Further, it was stipulated that the crime charged was a felony not involving violence.

Under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(b)(1), a prisoner charged with a nonviolent felony is entitled to be brought to trial within one year. The rule provides “[t]he period of time established by this rule shall commence when the person is taken into custody as a result of the subject conduct or criminal episode, or when the subject charge of crime is filed, whichever is earlier, . . ..” Herein, the speedy trial period commenced June 8, 1977. Travis was recaptured on that date and the arrest report reflects a charge of escape. The State had one year from that date in which to bring Travis to trial. The State presented no evidence tending to show Travis’ nonavailability for trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(e). The State’s lack of knowledge concerning Travis’ recapture might have constituted an exceptional circumstance as set forth in Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(f). However, there was no order of the court granting an extension of the speedy trial period. Accordingly, an extension of time can not be presumed. Stuart *v. State,*360 So.2d 406 (Fla.1978). Since Travis was not brought to trial within one year from the date he was taken into custody as a result of the subject conduct, he was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule. Travis’ conviction is reversed with directions that he be discharged from the charge of escape.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cody L. DENTON et al.

No. 65443.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 1979.

In re Eric R. Guidry, applying for supervisory writ of certiorari or review. Lafourche Parish. No. 85909.

Denied.
#### § 599.401 [Reserved]
# C_2006073EN.01000101.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 March 2006

(2006/C 73/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1969 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69080 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3730 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5763 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5757 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,700 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9075 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5107 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,56 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,583 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6149 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6894 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3995 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2875 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9571 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9400 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 172,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5827 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6157 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 915,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,424 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,281 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,3360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1969

JPY

Japanese yen

141,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69080

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3730

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5763

ISK

Iceland króna

87,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5757

CZK

Czech koruna

28,700

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9075

RON

Romanian leu

3,5107

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,56

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,583

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6149

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6894

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3995

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2875

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9571

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9400

KRW

South Korean won

1 172,42

ZAR

South African rand

7,5827

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6157

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 915,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,424

PHP

Philippine peso

61,281

RUB

Russian rouble

33,3360

THB

Thai baht

46,765

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 99.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Janet Spitler, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant
to [SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.

                                       Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ Janet P. Spitler
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Janet P. Spitler
                                           Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer


                                       May 13, 2003
                                       ------------
                                       Date

<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.126 Reopening of determinations and decisions. ( a ) A determination that a GHP or LGHP is a nonconforming GHP or the decision or revised decision of a hearing officer or of the CMS Administrator may be reopened within 12 months from the date on the notice of determination or decision or revised decision, for any reason by the entity that issued the determination or decision.
( b ) The decision to reopen or not to reopen is not appealable.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FRANK WATERS,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1068

[May 11, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Richard L. Oftedal, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-

CA-015770-XXXX-MB.

Garrett Kesl of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Adam A. Diaz of Diaz Anselmo & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., ,concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-828V

Filed: June 26, 2017

Not to be Published

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*

VICKI CAREY, on behalf *

of her minor child, C.C., *

* 

Petitioner, * Petitioner’s Motion for a 

* Decision Dismissing the Petition;

v. * Insufficient Proof of Causation; Vaccine 

* Act Entitlement; Denial Without Hearing 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DECISION 

On July 12, 2016, Vicki Carey filed a Petition for Vaccine Compensation in the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”),1alleging that C.C. was injured by a 

vaccine listed in the Vaccine Injury Table. See § 14. The information in the record, however, 

does not show entitlement to an award under the Program.

On June 23, 2017, Petitioner moved for a decision dismissing her petition, 

acknowledging that she will be unable to prove she is entitled to compensation in the Program.

To receive compensation under the Program, Petitioner must prove either 1) that C.C.

suffered a “Table Injury” – i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table – corresponding 

to one of C.C.’s vaccinations, or 2) that C.C suffered an injury that was actually caused by a 

vaccine. See §§ 300aa-13(a)(1)(A) and 300aa-11(c)(1). An examination of the record did not 

uncover any evidence that C.C. suffered a “Table Injury.” Further, the record does not contain a 

medical expert’s opinion or any other persuasive evidence indicating that C.C.’s injury was 

vaccine-caused.

 

1 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 

Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, 

individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. 
Under the Act, the petitioner may not be given a Program award based solely on the 

petitioner’s claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical records or by 

the opinion of a competent physician. § 300aa-13(a)(1). In this case, because there are 

insufficient medical records supporting Petitioner’s claim, a medical opinion must be offered in 

support. Petitioner, however, has offered no such opinion.

Accordingly, it is clear from the record in this case that Petitioner has failed to 

demonstrate either that C.C. suffered a “Table Injury” or that C.C.’s injury was “actually caused” 

by a vaccination. Thus, this case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter 

judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/George L. Hastings, Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Esmaeel Ali Ahmed Al-Ansi

# 									Esmaeel Ali Ahmed Al-Ansi							

DS Memorial

September 17, 2008

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2008**Esmaeel Ali Ahmed Al-Ansi (Ismail Ali Al-Anisi), Local Law Enforcement, died on September 17, 2008, in Sanaa, Yemen.He was killed in an assault against U.S. Embassy Sanaa.

**Yemeni Government image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementYemen

Back to Top
- Office Home
- FAQ

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Medical Services...Child and Family Program

# Child and Family Program

## 				About Us			

					The Child and Family Program (CFP) is composed of a small team of dedicated multidisciplinary providers who work together to meet the needs of diplomatic families in support of our overseas mission. CFP team members complete post specific educational and mental health clearance recommendations for those children with identified needs. In addition, CFP adjudicates the Special Needs Education Allowance (SNEA) for those children that meet eligibility criteria for educationally required services and supports.				

## 							Key Topics						

        -  											Special Needs Education Allowance										 
        -  											Mental Health Clearance and Post Approval										 
        -  											Educational Clearances and Post Approvals										 

### 											Special Needs Education Allowance											

The Special Needs Education Allowance (SNEA) assists with funding special education and related educationally required services for dependent children of employees who are eligible for the Department of State Education Allowance (DSSR 270). 
													Learn More													Special Needs Education Allowance

### 											Mental Health Clearance and Post Approval											

CFP acts as a consultant in the Medical Clearances process. When indicated, Medical Clearances will place a mental health consult request for a clearance and/or post approval review to the CFP team. The CFP team will provide a recommendation to Medical Clearances, which makes the final clearance and/or post approval decisions. 
													Learn More													Mental Health Clearance and Post Approval

### 											Educational Clearances and Post Approvals											

CFP acts as a consultant in the Medical Clearances process. When indicated, Medical Clearances will place an educational consult request for a clearance and/or post approval review to the CFP team. The CFP team will provide a recommendation to Medical Clearances, which makes the final clearance and/or post approval decisions.
													Learn More													Educational Clearances and Post Approvals

Back to Top
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Thermally induced acceleratedaging and failure of ITE/Gould A.C. relays used in safety-related applications.**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/92-27

Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000989030
 
Notice| Supplement
 
March 3, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000725261 
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LTD PSHIP
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                 14,199
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          51,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       65,833
<PP&E>                              30,209,864
<DEPRECIATION>                      29,993,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        336,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   5,829
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            299,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          336,332
<SALES>                                86,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       87,939
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          66,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        21,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    21,520
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           21,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
```

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Presidential Associates I
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  August 13, 2004                    /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael L. Ashner
                                          Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 13, 2004                    /s/ Thomas Staples
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Thomas Staples
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                     - 16 -
```
Home...Elections in the Western Hemisphere 

# 									Elections in the Western Hemisphere 							

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 9, 2021

On behalf of the people of the United States, I wish the citizens of Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru successful elections on April 11 that are fair, free, accessible, and peaceful.  As we strive to protect and strengthen democracies, we must recognize that free and fair elections for all citizens are only one step in the process; respect for results, fundamental freedoms, and accountability must accompany the free and fair vote.  Democracy flourishes when citizens and governments actively promote equality under the law and human rights for all, and democracy thrives when we carefully and vigorously tend to such fundamentals.  History here in the Americas and beyond has shown that societies that follow a non-democratic path struggle to reclaim lost ground.  To avoid that, we all must remain vigilant in strengthening our democratic institutions to support the rule of law, a free press, and good governance, and build systems that solve the problems and move us towards a better future.  Twenty years ago this September, the nations of the Americas gathered in Lima to sign the Inter-American Democratic Charter which affirms that, “democracy is a way of life based on liberty and enhancement of economic, social, and cultural conditions for the peoples of the Americas.” Our best regards to those celebrating and preserving that democratic way of life this Sunday and beyond.

 

Tags

BoliviaBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEcuadorElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonPeruThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 137.72 Are Self-Governance Tribes and their employees carrying out statutorily mandated grant programs added to a funding agreement covered by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)?

Yes, Self-Governance Tribes and their employees carrying out statutorily mandated grant programs are added to a funding agreement covered by the FTCA. Regulations governing coverage under the FTCA are published at 25 CFR Part 900, Subpart M.