alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIgnition of Cellulosic Paper at Low Radiant FluxesThe ignition of cellulosic paper by low level thermal radiation is investigated. Past work on radiative ignition of paper is briefly reviewed. No experimental study has been reported for radiative ignition of paper at irradiances below 10 Watts/sq.cm. An experimental study of radiative ignition of paper at these low irradiances is reported. Experimental parameters investigated and discussed include radiant power levels incident on the sample, the method of applying the radiation (focussed vs. diffuse Gaussian source), the presence and relative position of a separate pilot ignition source, and the effects of natural convection (buoyancy) on the ignition process in a normal gravity environment. It is observed that the incident radiative flux (in W/sq.cm) has the greatest influence on ignition time. For a given flux level, a focussed Gaussian source is found to be advantageous to a more diffuse, lower amplitude, thermal source. The precise positioning of a pilot igniter relative to gravity and to the fuel sample affects the ignition process, but the precise effects are not fully understood. Ignition was more readily achieved and sustained with a horizontal fuel sample, indicating the buoyancy plays a role in the ignition process of cellulosic paper. Smoldering combustion of doped paper samples was briefly investigated, and results are discussed.Document ID19960048690Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWhite, K. Alan*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107311E-10405NAS 1.15:107311Accession Number96N33910Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 963-80-0ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048690.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources
- Contact Us

HomeFamily Member Employment within a U.S. Embassy or Consulate...Expanded Professional Associates Program (EPAP) Position List

# 									Expanded Professional Associates Program (EPAP) Position List							

Global Community Liaison Office

		EPAP Questions		

## 								IMPORTANT 							

        -  **The Spring EPAP USAJOBS vacancy announcement is now closed.  Please log onto your USAJOBS account to check the status of your application.** 
        -  To be eligible to apply, EPAP applicants must meet the definition of an Appointment Eligible Family Member (AEFM) as defined in 3 FAM 7120. AEFMs employed at post on a Family Member Appointment (FMA) or a Personal Service Agreement (PSA) are NOT eligible to apply within the first 90 calendar days of their employment regardless of their qualifications or skills. (This restriction does not apply to AEFMs with a When Actually Employed (WAE) or intermittent work schedule). 

### Index

        - Bureau of African Affairs Position List
        - Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Position List
        - Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs and Bureau of International Organization Affairs
        - Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs Position List
        - Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Position List
        - Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs Position List

### 

### Bureau of African Affairs (AF) Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

### Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (EAP) Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

* This cycle, there are four remote-eligible HR EPAP positions in EAP (marked by *) that are open to any AEFM assigned to a post within EAP. To qualify for these positions, you must have orders to a post within EAP.   These positions are subject to space availability inside the mission and ICASS funding.

### Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs and Bureau of International Organization Affairs Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

1This position is based in Istanbul but serves Damascus (SRP). Applicants must be posted to Istanbul.

### Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (NEA) Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

1This position is based in Istanbul but serves Damascus (SRP). Applicants must be posted to Istanbul.

### Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

### Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs (WHA) Position List

Language Requirement is formatted as Speaking 1-5 / Reading 1-5

Tags

Family Member EmploymentGlobal Community Liaison OfficeGlobal Community Liaison Office

## Related Articles

-  											 													Family Member Employment within a U.S. Embassy or Consulate			
Read more
 
-  					April 1, 2024								Family Member Employment			
Read more
 
-  											 													Family Member Employment – Frequently Asked Questions			
Read more
 

Back to Top
Amendment to the Mellon Financial Executive Deferred Comp. Plan



 Exhibit 10.173 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MELLON FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (POST 12/31/04) 
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2005 
 (the
“Plan”) 
 In order to assure documentary compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and clarify coordination with
various other non-qualified programs so as to avoid unintended and impermissible substitutions or accelerations because of offsets by benefits under such programs and in accordance with the reservation of the right to amend the Plan under Article
IX, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. In the calculation of the reduction of a Participant’s Section 4.7 Retirement Plan
Make-Up, the “Participant’s interest in the cash value of the Policies” shall be determined as of the Participant’s termination of employment (and shall not be subject to any variation on the basis of any election or action of
the Participant or the Company). 
  

							
	Date:	 	 December 22, 2008
	 		 	 /s/ Lisa B. Peters

		 		 		 	Lisa B. Peters
		 		 		 	Chief Human Resources Officer
1 

### Pe r e z , I d a lia

F r om: J eann i ne T a c k ett [ J eann i ne. T a c k ett @ v a ll e y a i r .o rg ] S e nt: T ue s da y , Ma rc h 04, 2014 1:41 PM T o: P e r e z , Ida li a; K a y , R y nda Cc: s a m i r

. s he i k h @ v a ll e y a i r .o r g; T odd De Y oung S ub jec t: Ru l e 9610 A tt ac hm e nt s: 06 R9610 A ppend i x D_M O P 01.31.14.pdf

U pd a te s h a v e b e e n m a d e t o o u r w e b si te f o r R u l e 9 61 0 Annu al D e m o n s t r a t i o n r e p o r t , D a t a Sp r e a d s h e e t , a n d M O P

. T h e r e w as 1 i t e m o n t h e M O P t h a t h a d t o b e c o rr e c t e d du e t o a n A RB li n k t h a t c h a ng e d v e r y r e c e n t l y , s e e b e l o w
. I h a v e a tt ac h e d t h e M O P w i t h t h i s n ew r e v i si o n f o r y o u r r e c o r d s
. P l e a s e l e t m e k n o w i f t h e r e i s a n y t h i ng e ls e y o u n ee d.



### P r opos iti on 1 B G u i d e li n e s :

· 

### 2013 P r opos iti on 1 B : G oods Mov e m e n tE mi ss i on R e du c ti on P r o g r a m G u i d e li n e s (a pp r o v e d 1 / 25 / 2013 ) : h tt p :// www
. ar

b. ca

. g ov / b onds / g m bond

/ g m bond.h tm

· 

### A pp li ca

b l e P r o j ec t T y p e s i n c l ud e A pp e nd i x A

· 

### S a m p l e C a l c u l a ti ons F o r y ea r 4 p r o j ec ts

· 

### S o li c it a ti on 1 h tt p :// www
. ar

b. ca

. g ov / b onds / g m bond

/ do c s / ca l c u l a t o r

_d i rec ti ons_t r

u c ks_ 2 013_14.pdf

· 

### S o li c it a ti on 2 h tt p :// www
. ar

b. ca

. g ov / b onds / g m bond

/ do c s / ca l c u l a t o r

_d i rec ti ons_t r

u c ks_ 2 013_14_so li c it
a ti on_2.pdf

· 

### P r o j ec t ca l c u l a t o r i n E x c e l f

o r m a t f o r y e ar 4 p r o j e c t s :

· 

### S o li c it a ti on 1 h tt p :// www
. ar

b. ca

. g ov / b onds / g m bond

/ do c s / p r op

_ 1b_ g oods_

m ov e m e n t

_2 0 13_14_t r

u c ks_
ca l c u l a t o r _so li c it a ti on_1 .x l sm

· 

### S o li c it a ti on 2 h tt p :// www
. ar

b. ca

. g ov / b onds / g m bond

/ do c s / p r op

_ 1b_ g oods_

m ov e m e n t

_2 0 13_14_t r

u c ks_
ca l c u l a t o r _so li c it a ti on_2 .x l sm



## J ea n n i n e T a c k e t t S e n i or A i r Q u a l i t y S p e c i al i s t S trate gi e s & I n c e n t i v e s D e pt. S a n J oa q u i n V al l e y AP C D 559

- 23 0

- 58 4 3 ** fa x 559

- 230

- 611 2
# C_2006060EN.01002101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg by order of that court of 1 December 2005 in Velvet & Steel Immobilien und Handels GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel

(Case C-455/05)

(2006/C 60/41)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Hamburg of 1 December 2005, received at the Court Registry on 23 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Velvet & Steel Immobilien und Handels GmbH and Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel on the following question:

Is Article 13B(d)(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes to be interpreted, with respect to the concept of ‘Übernahme von Verbindlichkeiten’ (assumption of obligations), as meaning that only pecuniary obligations are to be subsumed under that concept or does that provision also include the assumption of other obligations, for example, service obligations?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---
HomeSlovakia

# Slovakia

87 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Peter Harrell,  Senior Director for International Economics and Competitiveness, Ruth Berry,  Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Information and Communications Policy,  and Peter A. Winn,  Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer	  October 7, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Slovakia’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 1, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Slovakia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Slovakia	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Slovakia	  June 2, 2022 
        -    DipNote  		Embrace of Ukrainian Refugees Reminds Diplomat of How Americans Welcomed His Japanese Grandparents	  May 31, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Slovak Republic (22-513) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Information	  May 13, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Slovakia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Slovak Republic (22-401) – Defense Cooperation Agreement	  April 1, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Donfried’s Travel to Denmark, Czech Republic, and Slovakia 	  March 25, 2022 

previous page123456…9next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-64705, 333-30511 and No. 333-15725) on Form S-3 and on Form
S-8 (No. 333-24917) of Berger Holdings, Ltd. of our report dated February 21,
2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Berger Holdings, Ltd. as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholder's equity and cash flows and related financial statement
schedules for each of the year's in the two year period ended December 31, 1999,
which report are incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1999 annual
report Form 10-K of Berger Holdings, Ltd.


/S/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2000


                                      -34-
#### Edwin C. LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. WW-69.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 30, 1980.

Edwin Cooper Lee, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Curtis A. Golden, State’s Atty., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief for the reason that the motion is legally insufficient on its face. Appellant’s allegations concerning errors in a pre-sentence investigation report did not meet the standard of specificity required by *Wood v. State,*375 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); *Bohn v. State,*354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
#### JOHN J. TOOHEY, Jr., COMMISSIONER, ETC., PROSECUTOR, v. FRED GORMAN, PETITIONER BELOW; MINER EDGAR CHEMICAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT BELOW.

Submitted May 2, 1989

Decided October 3, 1939.

Before Justices Parker, Bodine and Perskie.

For the prosecutor, *Stephen J. Lorenz*and *William, J. Egan,*assistant attorney-general.

For the Miner Edgar Chemical Corporation, *Isidor Kalisch.*

*236Per Curiam.

Gorman, the petitioner below, is totally and permanently disabled as a result of two causes, an accident, and a preexisting disease. There was an award for partial disability of three hundred and seventy-five weeks, and on a later petition a second award adjudging for total disability of twenty-five weeks more. Both have been paid in full.

A third application was made, based on the act of 1923, chapter 49, as amended by chapter 135 of 1928, for further compensation payments to continue indefinitely. As amended, the petition joined the employer and the Commissioner of Labor as respondents; and this raised the question whether these further payments should come from the employer or from the one per cent. fund. The deputy commissioner held that the accident was the sole cause of the permanent disability, and made a further award against the employer. On appeal to the Common Pleas, this finding of fact was reversed and the court held that “there was a demonstrable disability pre-existing and separate from that caused by the accident.” Based on this finding there was a judgment that the employer had fully met — in fact, more than met — -its legal obligation, and that further payments be made out of the one per cent, fund, final judgment to be entered in favor of the employer. The present writ is to review that judgment of the Pleas.

The case is submitted on briefs; and we do not observe that the finding of fact by the Pleas is seriously questioned. In any event, we think that it is sound. And as to the correctness of the finding in point of law, the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in *Richardson*v. *Essex, &c., Co.,*119 *N. J. L.*47, seems controlling.

The writ of *certiorari*is therefore dismissed, but without costs.
#### Donald SCHAEFFER, Appellant, v. Jack A. ATWILL, C.P.A., P.A., Jack A. Atwill and Continental Casualty Company, etc., Appellees.

No. 78-887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1979.

Shupack & Weisser and Mark R. Stark-man, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Knight, Peters, Pickle, Niemoeller & Flynn and Stephen A. Stieglitz, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Investment Corporation of Florida v. Buchman,*208 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); and *Canaveral Capital Corporation v. Bruce,*214 So.2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.2490 Release of Part C MLR data. ( a ) *Terminology.* Subject to the exclusions in paragraph (b) of this section, Part C MLR data consists of the information submitted under § 422.2460.
( b ) *Exclusions from Part C MLR data.* For the purpose of this section, the following items are excluded from Part C MLR data: ( 1 ) Narrative descriptions that MA organizations submit to support the information reported to CMS pursuant to the reporting requirements at § 422.2460, such as descriptions of expense allocation methods.
( 2 ) ( i ) Information that is reported at the plan level, such as the number of member months associated with each plan under a contract, including information submitted for a contract consisting of only one plan.
( ii ) Amounts that are reported as expenditures for a specific type of supplemental benefit, where the entire amount that is reported represents costs incurred by the only plan under the contract that offers that benefit.
( 3 ) Any information that could be used to identify Medicare beneficiaries or other individuals.
( 4 ) MLR review correspondence.
( 5 ) Any information for a contract for those contract years for which the contract is determined to be non-credible, as defined in accordance with § 422.2440(d).
( c ) *Data release.* CMS releases to the public Part C MLR data, for each contract for each contract year, no earlier than 18 months after the end of the applicable contract year.
[81 FR 80557, Nov. 15, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 16736, Apr. 16, 2018; 87 FR 27899, May 9, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3356 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3356

   To specify that States may waive certain requirements relating to 
   commercial motor vehicle operators under chapter 313 of title 49, 
   United States Code, with respect to the operators of certain farm 
                   vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 1996

Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. Lightfoot) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To specify that States may waive certain requirements relating to 
   commercial motor vehicle operators under chapter 313 of title 49, 
   United States Code, with respect to the operators of certain farm 
                   vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVERS FOR CERTAIN FARM VEHICLES.

    (a) Definitions.--As used in this section:
            (1) Custom harvesting farm machinery.--The term ``custom 
        harvesting farm machinery'' includes vehicles used for custom 
        harvesting that--
                    (A) are classified under subpart F of part 383, of 
                title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as being 
                included in Group A, B, or C (as those terms are used 
                in section 383.91 of that part); and
                    (B) are used on a seasonal basis to provide 
                transportation of--
                            (i) agricultural commodities from field to 
                        storage; and
                            (ii) harvesting machinery and equipment 
                        from farm to farm.
            (2) Commercial driver's license.--The term ``commercial 
        driver's license'' has the meaning provided that term in 
        section 31301(3) of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Waivers.--In addition to the authority granted to States to 
waive the application of chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code, 
with respect to farm vehicles described in 53 Fed. Reg. 37313-37316 and 
farm-related service industries described in 57 Fed. Reg. 13650-13654, 
each State that issues commercial driver's licenses in accordance with 
chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code, may waive the application 
of any requirement for obtaining a commercial driver's license for 
operators of custom harvesting farm machinery or employees of farm-
related service industries (or both) that would otherwise apply.
                                 <all>
```
GOVERNMENTOFTHEDISTRiCTOFCOLUMBIADistrictDepartmentoftheEnvironment ***AirQualityDivisionMEMORANDUM

ii

j

/7TO:GeorgeHawkins

A741Director,DistrictDepartmentoftheEnvironmentFROM:CecilyBeauHearingOfficerDATE:May27,2009SUBJECT:HearingOfficer’sCertificationforthePublicHearingonProposedTransportationConformityRegulationsThisistocertifythat,pursuanttotheenclosedNoticeofPublicHearingpublishedintheWashingtonTimes,ahearingwasheldatapproximately6:00p.m.onMay26,2009togivethepublictheopportunitytocommentontheproposedtransportationconformityregulationsCecilyBeauoftheDepartmentoftheEnvironment,AirQualityDivision,representedtheDistrict.Nooneattendedthepublichearing.DR(IDT\R\HNI51NSfteetNE5thFlWasgtonDC20002Phone(202)5352250Facsimile(202)4813771(IT11:NLR()\NH-T
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6050
GARY GLENN ROBERTS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-124-2) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 28, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Glenn Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gary Glenn Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roberts has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S.Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED