alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHead-up transition behavior of pilots during simulated low-visibility approachesEach of 13 commercial pilots from four airlines flew a total of 108 manual flight director approaches in a moving base simulation of a medium-sized turbojet (95,000 lb gross weight) which had a day and night Redifon external scene. Three levels of runway visual range (RVR) (1,600; 2,400; and  greater than 8,000 ft), three wind-shear profiles, nine ceiling heights, and continuous and intermittent visibility after initial breakout were tested. The results indicated that: (1) mean decision time ranged from 2 to 4.6 sec for ceilings under 380 ft across the three RVR conditions; (2) mean vertical distance traveled during the visual-cue assessment period was a relatively constant proportion below the existing ceiling; (3) a significant three way interaction in mean decision time between wind shear, day-night, and ceiling RVR variables occurred; (4) mean number of head-up transitions to VFR conditions after breakout ranged from 4.6 to 13.4 and increased as a function of ceiling and severity of wind shear; the typical duration of fixation out the window was 1.5 sec; and (5) subjective pilot ratings of controllability and precision of control as well as amount of skill, attention, or effort required to make the landing were influenced significantly by the wind shear, night conditions, and low breakout ceiling conditions.Document ID19800017541Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHaines, R. F.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1980Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberA-8057NASA-TP-1618Accession Number80N26039Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-09-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800017541.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1995             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                         224,367                 137,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  39,131
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,609                 109,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,515                   3,091
<INVENTORY>                                     28,643                  21,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,419                 351,813
<PP&E>                                         678,186                 834,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,123                 163,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,588,709               1,597,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,835                 522,720
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           453                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     649,019                 622,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,588,709               1,597,677
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,550,642               1,739,526
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,395,910               1,670,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,600                   2,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,598                  46,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,378                  34,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,608                  24,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    984                   1,105
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,786                   8,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of sidewall geometry on the installed performance of nonaxisymmetric convergent-divergent exhaust nozzlesThe investigation was conducted at static conditions and over a Mach number range from 0.6 to 1.2. Angle of attack was held constant at 0 deg. High pressure air was used to simulate jet exhaust flow at ratios of jet total pressure to free-stream static pressure from 1 (jet off) to approximately 10. Sidewall cutback appears to be a viable way of reducing nozzle weight and cooling requirements without compromising installed performance.Document ID19810007461Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsYetter, J. A.*(George Washington Univ. Hampton, Va., United States)*Leavitt, L. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1771L-13826Accession Number81N15976Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 530-03-13-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810007461.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.105 Special rules for self-referral and point of service option. ( a ) *Self-referral.* When an MA plan member receives an item or service of the plan that is covered upon referral or pre-authorization from a contracted provider of that plan, the member cannot be financially liable for more than the normal in-plan cost sharing, if the member correctly identified himself or herself as a member of that plan to the contracted provider before receiving the covered item or service, unless the contracted provider can show that the enrollee was notified prior to receiving the item or service that the item or service is covered only if further action is taken by the enrollee.
( b ) *Point of service option.* As a general rule, a POS benefit is an option that an MA organization may offer in an HMO plan to provide enrollees with additional choice in obtaining specified health care services. The organization may offer a POS option— ( 1 ) Before January 1, 2006, under a coordinated care plan as an additional benefit as described in section 1854(f)(1)(A) of the Act;
( 2 ) Under an HMO plan as a mandatory supplemental benefit as described in § 422.102(a); or
( 3 ) Under an HMO plan as an optional supplemental benefit as described in § 422.102(b).
( c ) *Ensuring availability and continuity of care.* An MA HMO plan that includes a POS benefit must continue to provide all benefits and ensure access as required under this subpart.
( d ) *Enrollee information and disclosure.* The disclosure requirements specified in § 422.111 apply in addition to the following requirements: ( 1 ) *Written rules.* MA organizations must maintain written rules on how to obtain health benefits through the POS benefit.
( 2 ) *Evidence of coverage document.* The MA organization must provide to beneficiaries enrolling in a plan with a POS benefit an “evidence of coverage” document, or otherwise provide written documentation, that specifies all costs and possible financial risks to the enrollee, including— ( i ) Any premiums and cost-sharing for which the enrollee is responsible;
( ii ) Annual limits on benefits and on out-of-pocket expenditures;
( iii ) Potential financial responsibility for services for which the plan denies payment because they were not covered under the POS benefit, or exceeded the dollar limit for the benefit; and
( iv ) The annual maximum out-of-pocket expense an enrollee could incur.
( e ) *Prompt payment.* Health benefits payable under the POS benefit are subject to the prompt payment requirements in § 422.520.
( f ) *POS-related data.* An MA organization that offers a POS benefit through an HMO plan must report enrollee utilization data at the plan level by both plan contracting providers (in-network) and by non-contracting providers (out-of-network) including enrollee use of the POS benefit, in the form and manner prescribed by CMS.
[63 FR 35077, June 26, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 40320, June 29, 2000; 70 FR 4721, Jan. 28, 2005; 75 FR 19805, Apr. 15, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis J. FitzSimons, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Company, certify that (i)
Tribune Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of Tribune Company.



| | /s/ 
        Dennis J. FitzSimons         Dennis J. FitzSimons     
           Chairman, President and         Chief Executive Officer  
                  October 27, 2005
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HomeEspañol...Declaración del secretario de Estado de EE. UU. con motivo del Día internacional contra la homofobia, la bifobia, la interfobia y la transfobia

# 									Declaración del secretario de Estado de EE. UU. con motivo del Día internacional contra la homofobia, la bifobia, la interfobia y la transfobia							

Traducciones en español

17  de mayo de  2024

DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTADO DE EE. UU.DECLARACIÓN DE PRENSAANTONY J. BLINKEN, SECRETARIO DE ESTADO17 DE MAYO DE 2024

Cada año el 17 de mayo conmemoramos el Día internacional contra la homofobia, la bifobia, la interfobia y la transfobia. En este día, reflexionamos sobre la violencia y la discriminación que sufren en todo el mundo las personas lesbianas, gais, bisexuales, transgénero, cuir e intersexuales (LGBTQI+) y nos comprometemos de nuevo a oponernos a estos actos. Este año, como todos los años, afirmamos inequívocamente: Las personas LGBTQI+ merecen el reconocimiento de sus derechos humanos universales y de su dignidad humana.

Las personas LGBTQI+ continúan enfrentándose a insidiosas formas de estigma y discriminación. A pesar de que cada vez más países avanzan hacia la igualdad plena, personas LGBTQI+ siguen siendo condenadas a muerte por atreverse a vivir su orientación sexual o identidad de género, sometidas a “terapias” de conversión y cirugías de “normalización” coercitivas, discriminadas al recibir servicios de salud, restringidas en el ejercicio de libertades fundamentales y privadas de la dignidad de la unión entre personas del mismo sexo y de la realización de la familia.

Mientras reflexionamos sobre las injusticias que sufren las personas LGBTQI+ y sus aliados, no debemos olvidar que hoy es fundamentalmente un día de acción. En este día y todos los días, Estados Unidos se une a las personas LGBTQI+ de todo el mundo. Seguiremos defendiendo los derechos de las personas LGBTQI+ no sólo porque tenemos el imperativo moral de hacerlo, sino porque contribuye a fortalecer la democracia, fortalecer la seguridad nacional y promover la salud y el desarrollo económico a escala mundial.

Para ver el texto original, ir a: https://www.state.gov/on-the-international-day-against-homophobia-biphobia-interphobia-and-transphobia-2/

*Esta traducción se proporciona como una cortesía y únicamente debe considerarse fidedigna la fuente original en inglés.*

Back to Top
DENY and Opinion Filed June 17 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 22
- 00564
- CV IN RE SUMMER INFANT (USA), INC. , Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 14
- 02235
- C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg Before the Court is relator’s May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus. In the petition, relator asks us to compel the tri al court to rescind its mistrial order and enter relator’s proposed judgment. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc ., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion.– 2

–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A P P
. P. 52.8(a).

220564f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Ecuador (23-719) – Air Transport Agreement

# 									Ecuador (23-719) – Air Transport Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 19, 2023

Transportation: Aviation Transport Services

Signed at Quito November 16, 2022; entered into force July 19, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [3 MB]

Tags

Air Transport AgreementsEcuadorTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lucille ALLEN v. Warden Johnnie JONES, Louisiana Correctional Institute, St. Gabriel.

No. 65737.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Lucille Allen, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 265-590.

Writ denied as to relator’s claims of an unkept plea bargain, the same being without merit. Writ denied as to relator’s claim that the prior convictions used in relator’s multiple bill conviction were unconstitutionally obtained as that claim must first be presented to the District Court.
- Office Home
- Key Topics

HomeBureau of Economic and Business Affairs...Direct Line for American Business

# Direct Line for American Business

							Subscribe							

## About Direct Line

With 96 percent of global consumers living outside the United States, exports are a great way to increase jobs and income here at home. Successful exporting requires accurate and up-to-the minute information on opportunities and market conditions abroad. The Direct Line program provides a unique opportunity for American businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, to engage directly via webcast with U.S. ambassadors overseas.

**Direct Line to American Business**

Direct Line lets U.S. business hear directly from our ambassadors and our economic and commercial experts at over 260 embassies and consulates in over 190 countries. Our staffs are trained to identify promising market sectors and to help U.S. exporters capitalize on new opportunities.

**How Direct Line Works**

Ambassadors or principal officers of U.S. missions overseas host Direct Line webinars or conference calls, often including local government officials, to discuss emerging sectors or new developments. Approximately 30-40 minutes is dedicated to allow participants to ask questions and offer comments.

**Who Can Participate**

Any U.S. business can register for a Direct Line webinar. This page provides a full list of past and upcoming calls. U.S. businesses can also subscribe to receive e-mail announcements of upcoming calls, as well as offer suggestions for future countries and sectors for calls. Direct Line is a free service of the U.S. Department of State.

**Contact Us**

We value your input on Direct Line. Click here to submit questions and comments or to suggest topics and countries for future webcasts.

## 							Discover More						

January 17, 2024		Business Opportunities in Malta’s Offshore Renewable Energy Sector		Read more 

		Direct Line for American Business: Upcoming and Past Events		Read more 

		 Subscribe here to receive updates on Direct Line.		Read more 

		Tools for Business		Read more 

### 											Previous Direct Line Events										

          -  																Direct Line Events Archive (2017-2020)																 

Back to Top
***EXHIBIT
      32.2***





**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dean
      Antonis, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Dean AntonisDean
                AntonisTreasurer
                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
                February 20, 2007











This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### John F. WALSH, Appellant, v. Thomas W. FRENCH, et al., Appellees.

No. 81-612.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 10, 1982.

*1132Edna L. Caruso and Schuler & Wilkerson, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard W. Groner of Moyle, Jones & Flanigan, P. A., West Palm Beach, for ap-pellees.

DELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a non-final order denying a petition for preliminary injunction. We affirm.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition for temporary injunction. Appellant failed to establish the essential criteria for a preliminary injunction, to wit: (1) irreparable harm; (2) a clear legal right; and (3) an inadequate remedy at law. *Dania Jai-Alai International, Inc. v. Murua,*375 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); *State Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Artis,*345 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

The order denying plaintiff’s petition for temporary injunction is affirmed.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP
RESTAURANTS, INC. BANANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF OCTOBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,289
<PP&E>                                         291,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,034
<BONDS>                                          4,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           444
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,271
<SALES>                                        355,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359,046
<CGS>                                          106,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               204,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93


</TABLE>
# C_2005330EN.01002503.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/25

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 October 2005 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-410/04) (1)

1

(2005/C 330/62)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.1.2005.

1

---
# Michiga

n Wome n In Municipal _, , , ^,, , Governmen t

/e.^^sisPsib ci n c-iffilinteo fIh e Michigo n Municipa l l^aguu.l'O . l.V w1487.An n Arl^>i-.M I 48]0 6 ' vPAHTMJ^NTO h •:'AMSPOR17ii'IO N •ViCKFTOPrRATlOM S 

# ^J^UoL^l^ ^

% X^ ^ / ^

yj^} ^ _yL4 ^

^'•' ; ^yyiM^ ^ y^rU^l ^ I 

# .p . 

# & , .C</<yi^A^ ' >^^;''7'2-fl'^tZ.''C^<^X.^.<i ^ A^-rt- ^ ^Oy-L-C^C^^^'^^-^ - ^ &



# 7 ' •yp-L . L-t Z



### , 41^^^U1^'L^^-CJ^X ^ 

### /Toc^-e X i-£^ - 

### (X^t-^-^^--^^^^^ ^ 

# yUjJL ^

X.^^-^^ ^ ^^^ ^ / yi^K. ^

^"J O -C-^^'> '