Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices 9449 

• Respondents: All Turkish and 

American YTYA Program participants 

from 2009 to 2011. 

• Estimated Number of Respondents: 

235. 

• Estimated Number of Responses: 

153. 

• Average Time per Response: 30 

minutes. 

• Total Estimated Burden Time: 77 

hours. 

• Frequency: One time. 

• Obligation to Respond: Voluntary. 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department to: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department. 

• Evaluate the accuracy of our 

estimate of the time and cost burden for 

this proposed collection, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used. 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected. 

• Minimize the reporting burden on 

those who are to respond, including the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. Please note that comments 

submitted in response to this Notice are 

public record. Before including any 

detailed personal information, you 

should be aware that your comments as 

submitted, including your personal 

information, will be available for public 

review. 

Abstract of Proposed Collection 

This request for a new information 

collection will allow ECA/P/V to 

conduct a survey to provide data not 

currently available. The survey is 

designed to assess the effectiveness of 

the YTYA Program in achieving its 

stated goals and objectives, and assess 

the outcomes of this two-way, bi-lateral 

exchange program that included 235 

young Turkish and young American 

participants from 2009 to 2011. This 

study is authorized by the Mutual 

Educational and Cultural Exchange Act 

of 1961, as amended (also known as the 

Fulbright-Hays Act) (22 U.S.C. 2451 et 

seq.). The survey will be sent 

electronically to be completed via web 

survey to all program participants of the 

years stated above. Data gathered will 

enable analysis that can potentially be 

used to design similar bi-lateral 

exchange programs, improve existing 

programs, and to inform ongoing and 

future exchange programs in ECA. 

Methodology 

The survey and all notifications will 

be entirely electronic to ease any burden 

on the participant. The survey will be 

distributed and responses received 

electronically using the survey 

application Vovici. 

Dated: January 31, 2013. 

Matt Lussenhop, 

Director of the Office of Policy and 

Evaluation, Bureau of Educational and 

Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02901 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

Applications for Certificates of Public 

Convenience and Necessity and 

Foreign Air Carrier Permits 

Notice of Applications for Certificates 

of Public Convenience and Necessity 

and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed 

Under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) 

during the Week Ending January 26, 

2013. The following Applications for 

Certificates of Public Convenience and 

Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier 

Permits were filed under Subpart B 

(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department 

of Transportation’s Procedural 

Regulations (see 14 CFR 301.201 et 

seq.). The due date for Answers, 

Conforming Applications, or Motions to 

Modify Scope are set forth below for 

each application. Following the Answer 

period DOT may process the application 

by expedited procedures. Such 

procedures may consist of the adoption 

of a show-cause order, a tentative order, 

or in appropriate cases a final order 

without further proceedings. 

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2013– 

0018. 

Date Filed: January 23, 2013. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: February 13, 2013. 

Description 

Application of Ultimate 

JETCHARTERS, LLC requesting 

authority to operate scheduled 

passenger service as a commuter air 

carrier. 

Barbara J. Hairston, 

Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02866 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Noise Exposure Map Notice, 

Southwest Florida International 

Airport, Fort Myers, FL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces its 

determination that the Noise Exposure 

Maps submitted by the Lee County Port 

Authority for the Southwest Florida 

International Airport under the 

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. Seq 

(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement 

Act) and 14 CFR Part 150 are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements. 

DATES: This notice is effective February 

8, 2013, and is applicable beginning 

January 30, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allan Nagy, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Orlando Airports 

District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 

Drive Citadel International Building, 

Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822, 407–812– 

6331. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice announces that the FAA finds 

that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted 

for Southwest Florida International 

Airport are in compliance with 

applicable requirements of Title 14 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 

150, effective November 15, 2012. 

Under 49 U.S.C. section 47503 of the 

Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement 

Act (the Act), an airport operator may 

submit to the FAA Noise Exposure 

Maps which meet applicable regulations 

and which depict non-compatible land 

uses as of the date of submission of such 

maps, a description of projected aircraft 

operations, and the ways in which such 

operations will affect such maps. The 

Act requires such maps to be developed 

in consultation with interested and 

affected parties in the local community, 

government agencies, and persons using 

the airport. An airport operator who has 

submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are 

found by FAA to be in compliance with 

the requirements of 14 CFR Part 150, 

promulgated pursuant to the Act, may 

submit a Noise Compatibility Program 

for FAA approval which sets forth the 

measures the airport operator has taken 

or proposes to take to reduce existing 

non-compatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional noncompatible uses. 

The FAA has completed its review of 

the Noise Exposure Maps and 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9450 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices 

1See CSX Transp. Inc.—Acquis. of Operating 

Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, et al. 

(STB served February 8, 2013). 

accompanying documentation 

submitted by the Lee County Port 

Authority. The documentation that 

constitutes the ‘‘Noise Exposure Maps’’ 

as defined in Section 150.7 of 14 CFR 

Part 150 includes: Table 4.1, RSW Noise 

Measurement Locations; Table 7.1, 2011 

Annual Operations; Table 7.2, 2011 

Annual-Average Day Fleet Mix 

(Itinerant Operations); Table 7.3, 2011 

Annual-Average Day Fleet Mix (Local 

Operations); Table 7.4, 2017 Annual 

Operations; Table 7.5, 2017 AnnualAverage Day Fleet Mix (Itinerant 

Operations); Table 7.6, 2017 AnnualAverage Day Fleet Mix (Local 

Operations); Table 7.7, 2011 and 2017 

Air Carrier Aircraft Stage Length 

Percentages; Table 7.8, 2011 Runway 

Use Percentages; Table 7.9, 2011 and 

2017 Departure Flight Track Use 

Percentages; Table 7.10, 2011 and 2017 

Arrival Flight Track Use Percentages; 

Table 7.11, 2011 and 2017 Local (Touch 

and Go) Flight Track Use Percentages; 

Table 8.1, 2012 DNL Contour Surface 

Areas; Table 8.2, 2017 DNL Contour 

Surface Areas; Table 8.3, 14 CFR Part 

150 Land Use Compatibility Guidelines; 

Table 8.4, Lee County Airport Noise 

Zones; Figure 1.2, Airport Location 

Map; Figure 1.3, Existing Land Uses; 

Figure 2.1, Airport Diagram; Figure 2–2, 

U.S. National Airspace System; Figure 

2.3, Southwest Florida International 

Airspace; Figure 2–7, RSW Published 

Arrivals and Departures; Figure 5.1, 

RSW RNAV Departures Established 

Since the 2006 14 CFR Part 150 Study; 

Figure 5–2, RSW RNAV Arrivals 

Established Since the 2006 14 CFR Part 

150 Study; Figure 5–3, Monthly 

Operations; Figure 7.1, Modeled Flight 

Tracks—Northeast Flow; Figure 7.2, 

Modeled Flight Tracks—Southwest 

Flow; Figure 7.3, Modeled Flight 

Tracks—Touch and Go; Figure 8.1, 2012 

DNL Noise Contours; Figure 8.2, 2017 

DNL Noise Contours; Figure 8.3, Future 

Land Use; Figure 8.4, Airport Noise 

Zones; Appendix C, RSW Published IFR 

Procedures; Appendix L, Map ‘‘A’’ 2012 

NEM and Map ‘‘B’’, 2017; NEM Chapter 

9, Page 9–1, Airport Sponsor’s Noise 

Exposure Map Certification; November 

1, 2012 Airport Sponsor NEM Submittal 

Letter. 

The FAA has determined that these 

Noise Exposure Maps and 

accompanying documentation are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements. This determination is 

effective on January 30, 2013. 

FAA’s determination on the airport 

operator’s Noise Exposure Maps is 

limited to a finding that the maps were 

developed in accordance with the 

procedures contained in Appendix A of 

14 CFR Part 150. Such determination 

does not constitute approval of the 

airport operator’s data, information or 

plans, or a commitment to approve a 

Noise Compatibility Program or to fund 

the implementation of that Program. If 

questions arise concerning the precise 

relationship of specific properties to 

noise exposure contours depicted on a 

Noise Exposure Map submitted under 

Section 47503 of the Act, it should be 

noted that the FAA is not involved in 

any way in determining the relative 

locations of specific properties with 

regard to the depicted noise exposure 

contours, or in interpreting the Noise 

Exposure Maps to resolve questions 

concerning, for example, which 

properties should be covered by the 

provisions of Section 47506 of the Act. 

These functions are inseparable from 

the ultimate land use control and 

planning responsibilities of local 

government. These local responsibilities 

are not changed in any way under 14 

CFR Part 150 or through FAA’s review 

of Noise Exposure Maps. Therefore, the 

responsibility for the detailed 

overlaying of noise exposure contours 

onto the map depicting properties on 

the surface rests exclusively with the 

airport operator that submitted those 

maps, or with those public agencies and 

planning agencies with which 

consultation is required under Section 

47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on 

the certification by the airport operator, 

under Section 150.21 of 14 CFR Part 

150, that the statutorily required 

consultation has been accomplished. 

Copies of the full Noise Exposure 

Maps documentation and of the FAA’s 

evaluation of the maps are available for 

examination at the following locations: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 

Hazeltine National Drive, Citadel 

International Building, Suite 400, 

Orlando, FL 32822. 

Questions may be directed to the 

individual named above under the 

heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Issued in Orlando, FL, on January 30, 2013. 

Bart Vernace, 

Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, 

Federal Aviation Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02894 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Surface Transportation Board 

[Docket No. FD 35661] 

Grand Trunk Western Railroad 

Company—Acquisition of Operating 

Easement—CSX Transportation, Inc. 

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, 

DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of exemption. 

SUMMARY: The Board is granting an 

exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from 

the prior approval requirements at 49 

U.S.C. 11323–25 for Grand Trunk 

Western Railroad Company (GTW), an 

indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 

Canadian National Railway Company, to 

acquire from CSX Transportation, Inc. 

(CSXT) an exclusive, perpetual, nonassignable railroad operating easement 

over approximately 2.1 miles of CSXT’s 

Memphis Terminal Subdivision, 

between Leewood, Tenn., milepost 

00F371.4, and Aulon, Tenn., milepost 

00F373.4 (Leewood-Aulon Line), subject 

to employee protective conditions. The 

Leewood-Aulon Line is currently owned 

by CSXT. Illinois Central Railroad 

Company, a GTW affiliate, operates over 

it via trackage rights. Along with the 

proposed easement acquisition by GTW, 

CSXT would retain local and overhead 

trackage rights over the Leewood-Aulon 

Line. 

GTW’s easement acquisition is one 

part of an Agreement for Exchange of 

Perpetual Easements between GTW and 

CSXT. In exchange for GTW’s acquiring 

an easement from CSXT over the 

Leewood-Aulon Line, GTW has agreed 

to grant CSXT an exclusive, perpetual, 

non-assignable railroad operating 

easement over 22.37 miles of GTW track 

on the Elsdon Subdivision between the 

connection with CSXT at Munster, Ind., 

milepost 31.07, and Elsdon, Ill., 

milepost 8.7, which connects to the 

southern end of the BNSF Railway 

Company’s Corwith Yard. The Board is 

separately granting authority for CSXT’s 

acquisition of this operating easement in 

the Chicago area in Docket Nos. FD 

35522 et al.1

DATES: This exemption will be effective 

on March 10, 2013. Petitions to stay 

must be filed by February 19, 2013. 

Petitions to reopen must be filed by 

February 28, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 

copies of all pleadings referring to 

Docket No. FD 35661 to: Surface 

Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES