alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeLatest Stories...DSS and GLIFAA show their pride during 2019 Capital Pride events

# 									DSS and GLIFAA show their pride during 2019 Capital Pride events							

DSS Articles

By Brielle Hoagland, DSS Intern, Summer 2019

June 17, 2019

The U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) joined GLIFAA*, Department family members, and friends to participate in the 2019 Capital Pride Parade and Festival, Saturday and Sunday, June 8-9, 2019.

During the Saturday afternoon parade, the group walked the 1.5 mile route alongside more than 200 organizations to show support for the LBGTQ+ community.

Sunday afternoon, foreign and civil service DSS employees operated a recruitment booth at the Capital Pride Festival, sharing the mission, heart and history of DSS, and its work to safeguard diplomacy around the world.

DSS and GLIFAA colleagues connected with the community, showing support for each other and highlighting the diversity within the Department of State.

*GLIFAA represents lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender personnel, their families and their allies (LGBT+) in the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Foreign Commercial Service, Foreign Agricultural Service, Peace Corps and other foreign affairs offices of the U.S. government.

Tags

DSS ArticlesLGBT Rights

Back to Top
HomeBidding and Assignments...Domestic Assignments

# 									Domestic Assignments							

Transition Center

## 								Key Resources							

        - Short-term Housing
        - Returning to the U.S. with Pets
        - Childcare and Schools
        - Directions to FSI
        - Foreign Affairs Organizations

The Overseas Briefing Center provides resources for a return from a U.S. embassy or consulate overseas, including information on some 33 Department of State locations within the United States.  Foreign affairs personnel can contact the OBC for more complete information and assistance.

### Temporary Housing

The number one concern for those transitioning home to the Washington, DC area is housing.  In the Washington, DC area, it’s all about location, location, location.  Short-term or temporary housing can ease the transition until something more permanent is found.
        - Short-term Housing
        - Directions to FSI

### Permanent Housing

        - AAFSW Housing Office  – The Associates of the American Foreign Service Worldwide (AAFSW) provides the services of a Housing Office located within the Department of State at Main State. Many Foreign Service home owners list their rental properties with the Housing Office.

### Bringing Your Pet to the United States from Overseas

        - Returning to the U.S. with Pets

### FSI Language Training for Eligible Family Members

        - Full Time Training  (in-person only) – Please contact FSI’s School of Language Studies at  FSISLSinquiries@state.gov  for eligibility information for EFM language training. Note that the registration is handled via the  employee’s  CDO or Assignment’s Officer.
        - Part Time Training  (distance language learning only) – Some online language learning opportunities may be available for Eligible Family Members (EFMs) and other U.S. Government employees. Please contact  OnlineLanguage@state.gov  for more information.

### Child Care, Schools and Summer Camps

        - For foreign affairs personnel transitioning to FSI for training, it is important to plan ahead for children’s schooling, child care, and summer activities.  Find  more resources here .

### Locating Organizations that Support the Foreign Affairs Community

        - These organizations  in the Washington, DC area provide program support for foreign affairs employees and family members.

***Note:** The information provided is****FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY****and in no way constitutes an endorsement, expressed or implied, by the Department of State. Links to websites outside the U.S. federal government or the use of trade, firm, or corporation names are for the convenience of the user and do not constitute an official endorsement or approval of any private sector website, product, service, or privacy policy.*

Back to Top
#### Maxine ROMERO et al. v. George BRAZZEL et al.

No. 80-C-1921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 24, 1980.

In re Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Iberia. 393 So.2d 141.

Granted.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1390 Data validation and auditing. ( a ) *General.* CMS will selectively audit MIPS eligible clinicians and groups on a yearly basis. If a MIPS eligible clinician or group is selected for audit, the MIPS eligible clinician or group will be required to do the following in accordance with applicable law and timelines CMS establishes: ( 1 ) Comply with data sharing requests, providing all data as requested by CMS or our designated entity. All data must be shared with CMS or our designated entity within 45 days of the data sharing request, or an alternate timeframe that is agreed to by CMS and the MIPS eligible clinician or group. Data will be submitted via email, facsimile, or an electronic method via a secure Web site maintained by CMS.
( 2 ) Provide substantive, primary source documents as requested. These documents may include: Copies of claims, medical records for applicable patients, or other resources used in the data calculations for MIPS measures, objectives, and activities. Primary source documentation also may include verification of records for Medicare and non-Medicare beneficiaries where applicable.
( b ) *Certification.* All MIPS eligible clinicians and groups that submit data and information to CMS for purposes of MIPS must certify to the best of their knowledge that the data submitted to CMS is true, accurate, and complete. Such certification must accompany the submission and be made at the time of submission.
( c ) *Reopening.* CMS may reopen and revise a MIPS payment adjustment in accordance with the rules set forth at §§ 405.980 through 405.986 of this chapter.
( d ) *Record retention.* All MIPS eligible clinicians and groups that submit data and information to CMS for purposes of MIPS must retain such data and information for 6 years from the end of the MIPS performance period.
[81 FR 77537, Nov. 4, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 53959, Nov. 16, 2017]
# C_2006131EN.01000601.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln) — Siegfried Aulinger v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-371/03) (1)

1

(Foreign and security policy - Common commercial policy - Embargo on the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro - Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 - Carriage of persons)

(2006/C 131/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Siegfried Aulinger

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Köln —

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 of 1 June 1992 prohibiting trade between the European Economic Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro must be interpreted as meaning that the commercial carriage of persons to or from Serbia and Montenegro in the form of split transport was prohibited.

‘Split transport’ is to be understood as meaning the carriage of persons to or from the territory covered by the embargo, organised by means of a joint operation between an undertaking established in a Member State of the Community and an undertaking established in the territory covered by the embargo whereby the former provides carriage to or from the area bordering the territory covered by the embargo and the latter provides carriage from that point into the territory covered by the embargo or from inside that territory to that point (with passengers changing vehicles).

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
#### § 420.400 Basis and scope.

This subpart implements sections 203(b) and (c) of Public Law 104-191, which require the establishment of programs to encourage individuals to report suspected cases of fraud and abuse and submit suggestions on methods to improve the efficiency of the Medicare program. Sections 203(b) and (c) of Public Law 104-191 also provide the authority for CMS to reward individuals for reporting fraud and abuse and for submitting suggestions that could improve the efficiency of the Medicare program. This subpart sets forth procedures for rewarding individuals.

[64 FR 66401, Nov. 26, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3215 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision 
   relating to Federal employees contracting or trading with Indians.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision 
   relating to Federal employees contracting or trading with Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING OR TRADING WITH INDIANS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 23 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
the item relating to section 437.
    (c) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall--
            (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) apply with respect to any contract obtained, and any 
        purchase or sale occurring, on or after the date of enactment 
        of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.918 Assignment.

Payment for a CAP drug may be made only on an assignment-related basis.

[70 FR 39099, July 6, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.1012 Fees for services of representatives.

Fees for any services performed on behalf of an affected party by an attorney appointed and qualified in accordance with 422.1008 are not subject to the provisions of section 206 of Title II of the Act, which authorizes the Secretary to specify or limit those fees.
October 09, 2023

# 						Joint Statement on Israel					

-  Home 
-  					Briefing Room				 
-  					Statements and Releases				 

*Today, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States of America released the following joint statement following their call:* 

Today, we — President Macron of France, Chancellor Scholz of Germany, Prime Minister Meloni of Italy, Prime Minister Sunak of the United Kingdom, and President Biden of the United States — express our steadfast and united support to the State of Israel, and our unequivocal condemnation of Hamas and its appalling acts of terrorism. We make clear that the terrorist actions of Hamas have no justification, no legitimacy, and must be universally condemned. There is never any justification for terrorism.  In recent days, the world has watched in horror as Hamas terrorists massacred families in their homes, slaughtered over 200 young people enjoying a music festival, and kidnapped elderly women, children, and entire families, who are now being held as hostages. Our countries will support Israel in its efforts to defend itself and its people against such atrocities. We further emphasize that this is not a moment for any party hostile to Israel to exploit these attacks to seek advantage. All of us recognize the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people, and support equal measures of justice and freedom for Israelis and Palestinians alike. But make no mistake: Hamas does not represent those aspirations, and it offers nothing for the Palestinian people other than more terror and bloodshed. Over the coming days, we will remain united and coordinated, together as allies, and as common friends of Israel, to ensure Israel is able to defend itself, and to ultimately set the conditions for a peaceful and integrated Middle East region. 

###

					Next Post: Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by First Lady Jill Biden at an American Cancer Society NFL Crucial Catch Watch Party								Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by First Lady Jill Biden at an American Cancer Society NFL Crucial Catch Watch Party			
October 09, 2023•Speeches and Remarks

					Next					Post

## Stay Connected

We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better.

																		Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden.								

-  Share this page on Facebook 
-  Share this page on X 
-  https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/09/joint-statement-on-israel/?utm_source=link
# C_2006022EN.01000302.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam by order of that court of 21 September 2005 in Amurta S.G.P.S. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam

(Case C-379/05)

(2006/C 22/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam of 21 September 2005, received at the Court Registry on 17 October 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Amurta S.G.P.S. and Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam on the following questions:

| 1. | Is the exemption under Article 4 of the Wet op de dividendbelasting 1965 [the 1965 Law on the Taxation of Dividends], as described in paragraphs 5.3 to 5.5 of this judgment, in conjunction with the exemption under Article 4a of that Law compatible with the provisions on the free movement of capital (Articles 56 to 58, formerly Articles 73b to 73d) of the EC Treaty, given that the exemption is applicable only to dividend payments to shareholders liable to corporation tax in the Netherlands or to foreign shareholders with a permanent establishment in the Netherlands, with the shares forming part of the assets of that permanent establishment, to whom the holding exemption under Article 13 of the Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969 [the 1969 Company Taxation Law] applies? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the exemption under Article 4 of the Wet op de dividendbelasting 1965 [the 1965 Law on the Taxation of Dividends], as described in paragraphs 5.3 to 5.5 of this judgment, in conjunction with the exemption under Article 4a of that Law compatible with the provisions on the free movement of capital (Articles 56 to 58, formerly Articles 73b to 73d) of the EC Treaty, given that the exemption is applicable only to dividend payments to shareholders liable to corporation tax in the Netherlands or to foreign shareholders with a permanent establishment in the Netherlands, with the shares forming part of the assets of that permanent establishment, to whom the holding exemption under Article 13 of the Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969 [the 1969 Company Taxation Law] applies?

| 2. | Does the answer to the question posed at 6.1 depend on whether the State of residence of a foreign shareholder/company to which the exemption under Article 4 of the Law does not apply grants that shareholder/company full credit for Netherlands dividend tax? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the answer to the question posed at 6.1 depend on whether the State of residence of a foreign shareholder/company to which the exemption under Article 4 of the Law does not apply grants that shareholder/company full credit for Netherlands dividend tax?

---
No. 99-524.

#### Jiricko *v.*Moser & Marsalek, P. C.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ensuring Our Safety and Security Through a 90-Day Suspension of the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis

# 									Ensuring Our Safety and Security Through a 90-Day Suspension of the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis							

Press Statement

Daniel B. Smith, Acting Secretary of State

January 22, 2021

Effective January 22, 2021, the United States is suspending the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis for 90 days. As the result of a joint investigation by the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General, the Department of Justice is prosecuting individuals for stealing U.S. government records from the Department of State’s Worldwide Refugee Admissions Processing System to take advantage of the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis. This scheme specifically targeted applications for direct access to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program made possible by the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007. This suspension of the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis is necessary to further review and address vulnerabilities. All refugee applicants are subject to stringent security and vetting requirements and are denied refugee status if they have ties to designated terrorist organizations or if they have engaged in terrorist activities. They go through extensive biographic and biometric vetting before they are admitted. There are no indications that the scheme jeopardized the broader refugee admissions program.

The discovery, investigation, and prosecution of these individuals demonstrates the dedication of the personnel charged with maintaining the safety and security of the United States and the American people – we have no higher priority. The message is clear for those who would seek to take advantage of America’s generosity in welcoming the world’s most vulnerable people – you will be held accountable.

We recognize the importance of assisting those who legitimately put their lives at risk to provide critical support to the United States in Iraq and we do not take the decision to suspend this program lightly. The United States has been and will continue to be a leader in the global response to humanitarian crises, including in Iraq. In addition to the resettlement of more than 3.1 million refugees since 1980, the United States is the world’s largest humanitarian assistance donor. Since Fiscal Year 2014, the United States has provided more than $3 billion in humanitarian assistance in Iraq and for Iraqis in the region, including more than $47 million to combat COVID-19 inside Iraq. Our assistance provides critical shelter, essential healthcare, emergency food assistance, protection, education, livelihoods, and water, sanitation, and hygiene services.

 

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationIraqOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
#### § 137.201 What are the purposes of the Tribal reporting requirements?

Tribal reports enable the Secretary to prepare reports required under Title V and to develop the budget request. The reporting requirements are not intended as a quality assessment or monitoring tool, although such provision may be included at the option of the Self-Governance Tribe. Under no circumstances will the reporting requirement include any confidential, proprietary or commercial information. For example, while staffing levels may be a part of a report, pay levels for the staff are considered confidential between the Self-Governance Tribe and the employee.
# C_2006108EN.01002801.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/28

---

Action brought on 17 March 2006 v Dorel Juvenile Group/OHIM

(Case T-88/06)

(2006/C 108/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. (Canton, USA) [represented by: Gesa Simon, lawyer]

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006 (Case R 616/2004-2) and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006 (Case R 616/2004-2) and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SAFETY 1ST’ for goods in classes 12, 20, 21 and 28 — application No 2 258 697

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the trade mark applied for is not devoid of any distinctive character in respect of the goods applied for.

Pleas in law:

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Victor WILLIAMS.

No. 80-K-2932.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re State of Louisiana, through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans. No. 276-212.

Denied. The District Attorney may seek a declaratory judgment in civil court.

MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., would grant the writ.