alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

GUSTAVO ABRAHAM DE LUNAORTIZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-50035 

D.C. No. 3:18-cr-03715-LAB-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Gustavo Abraham De Luna-Ortiz appeals from the district court’s judgment 

and challenges the conditions of supervised release imposed following his guiltyplea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-50035 

vacate in part, and remand with instructions. 

De Luna-Ortiz contends that the district court erred by imposing in the 

written judgment conditions of supervised release that the court did not orally 

pronounce at sentencing. We review de novo. See United States v. Napier, 463 

F.3d 1040, 1042 (9th Cir. 2006).

The district court did not err by including in the written judgment standard 

supervised release conditions 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 because the imposition of 

mandatory and standard conditions “is deemed to be implicit in an oral sentence 

imposing supervised release.” Id. at 1043. 

However, the district court erred by including in the written judgment 

conditions 4, 7, and 8 because it did not provide De Luna-Ortiz with the requisite 

notice of these now nonstandard conditions. See id. (district court denies 

defendant the right to be present for the imposition of sentence if it adds 

nonstandard conditions to defendant’s sentence after the sentencing hearing).

Because it appears that the district court intended to include in the written 

judgment the current versions of standard conditions 3, 5, and 13, we remand to the 

district court to conform the written judgment to the current version of standard

conditions 3, 5, and 13. 

In light of this disposition, we need not reach De Luna-Ortiz’s constitutional 

challenges to some of the standard conditions included in the written judgment. To 

the extent he argues that all of the standard conditions are substantively 
3 19-50035 

unreasonable because he will not be serving his supervised release in the United 

States, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United 

States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1002 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED.
# C_2006087EN.01000101.xml

| 11.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 April 2006

(2006/C 87/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2099 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4619 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6938 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3669 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5756 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,93 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5762 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,623 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,974 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5006 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,55 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6275 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6616 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3878 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3856 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9904 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9436 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 155,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4351 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,684 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 867,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4385 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,947 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,538 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,144 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2099

JPY

Japanese yen

143,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4619

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6938

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3669

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5756

ISK

Iceland króna

88,93

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5762

CZK

Czech koruna

28,623

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,974

RON

Romanian leu

3,5006

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,55

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6275

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6616

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3878

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3856

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9904

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9436

KRW

South Korean won

1 155,45

ZAR

South African rand

7,4351

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,684

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 867,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4385

PHP

Philippine peso

61,947

RUB

Russian rouble

33,538

THB

Thai baht

46,144

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Oldham, Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               
|---------------
|/s/ Paul Oldham
|Paul Oldham    

Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary

Dated: November 5, 2010

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Dominican Republic Independence Day

# 									Dominican Republic Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 27, 2022

On behalf of the United States, I send warm wishes to the people of the Dominican Republic as you celebrate your Independence Day on February 27.  As longstanding partners with shared democratic values, the Dominican Republic and the United States collaborate closely on a wide range of shared priorities, and we both benefit from expansive economic and people-to-people ties.

The Dominican Republic stands out as a defender of democracy, grounded in its commitment to fight corruption, promote transparent governance, and advance institutional reforms.  The United States is proud to support these reforms, which will benefit all Dominicans for generations to come.

In the past year, the United States proudly contributed financial and technical assistance for the Dominican Republic’s effective and lifesaving COVID-19 response.  The United States looks forward to deepening our collaboration with the Dominican government as we build back better in the coming year.  We pledge to continue to strengthen our robust and wide-ranging bilateral agenda geared toward tackling corruption, combating socio-economic exclusion, promoting economic prosperity, and bolstering our strategic security partnership.

We congratulate all Dominicans on 178 years of independence.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyDominican RepublicOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated January 9, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the 2003 Annual Report of Harleysville
National Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Harleysville National Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-69784, effective October 1, 1993, File No. 333-17813, effective December 13,
1996, File No. 333-79971, effective June 4, 1999, and File No. 333-79973, effective June 4, 1999).

GRAPHIC

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 4, 2004

74

---

QuickLinks
RC Invasion Int’l Inc. seeks a complete or partial exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. Part

21, subpart H, and 14 C.F.R 45.23, 45.27, 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2) and (c), 91.109, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Air craft System (UAS), which is the DJI Phantom 3 Professional pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
This exemption will permit RC Invasion Intl. Inc. to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography for real estate, and other land scape oriented purposes over certain areas of the United States

**INTRODUCTION A ND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER**  RC Invasion Intl. Inc. provides its clients with the high quality digital content for use in commercial marketing. RC Invasion Intl. Inc. has ove r 4 years of recreational/hobb y Experience in all aspects of aerial video and photography The objective of objective of RC Invasion Intl, Inc. is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting,

1. Real Estate Videography and Photography. 2. Automobile dealerships. 3. Parks , recreational golf courses and public lands. 4. Weddings , outdoor events. 4. Increase public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations at Colleges.

**BA CKGROUND**  I myself Harold Carvajal Currently hold an FAA Medical Certificate with endorsements in cross country flights, night flights I currently have 170 hours of logged time. I also hold a current AMA Aeronautical Modelers Association member card with Turbine Jet endorsement and also a Contest Director for the AMA. The AMA provides me a million dollar accidental coverage while flying any of my planes and or the DJI Phantom 3 Professional; I have over 3 5 years of flying model aircraft with no incidents to date. Future RC Invasion Int’l. Inc. p ilots will have their Private Pilot Medical certificate.

RC Invasion Int’l Inc. seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation and Hire within the NAS. The DJI Pha ntom 3 Pro fes s ional is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smartphone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional has a maximum gross weight of 2.82 pounds, a length of 23.2 inches (square size in all dimensions), height of 10 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 31 knots. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors. The Phantom 3 Advanced that will be operated by Elevated Exposures, LLC will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45.
Regards , Harold Carvajal RC Invasion Int’l, Inc. 13769 S.W. 145 Street Miami, Florida 33186

www.Rcinvasion.com Rcinvasion@gmail.com
----

Action brought on 11 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-13/06)

(2006/C 48/39)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 11 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Dimitris Triantafillou, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that although the Greek body ELPA (Elliniki Leskhi Aftokinitou kai Periigiseon; Automobile & Touring Club of Greece) which provides roadside assistance is not subject to the insurance directives, it engages in insurance activity for the purposes of Article 13B(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive.

The Commission relies on the other language versions of the directive and also:

----

(1)OJ No L 145, 13.6.1977, p.1.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3215 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3215

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating 
       to Federal employees contracting or trading with Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING OR TRADING WITH INDIANS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 23 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
the item relating to section 437.
    (c) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall--
            (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) apply with respect to any contract obtained, and any 
        purchase or sale occurring, on or after the date of enactment 
        of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date:  March 28, 2008 | /s/ John H. Castle                                                                         
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | John H. Castle
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|Date:  March 28, 2008 | /s/ Danice L. Chartrand                                                                    
|                      | Danice L. Chartrand
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### James D. HALL, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Respondent.

No. LL-300.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 1, 1978.

James D. Hall, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Hall’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking a delayed appeal on the merits of his conviction for murder in the second degree will be denied. Petitioner makes no allegation of facts tending to show that his right to appeal is frustrated by state action. *Baggett v. Wainwright,*229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). In an abundance of caution the court has required a response from the state, which includes evidentiary material, not contested by petitioner, showing that appellant is entitled to no relief.

The petition is DENIED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
RE: One more modeling question. and updates to Minnesota's Lead Emissions

Sheffer, Melissa (MPCA) to

:

Andy Chang

Cc

:

"Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)"

From: "Sheffer, Melissa (MPCA)" <Melissa.Sheffer@state.mn.us>

To: Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)" <Catherine.Neuschler@state.mn.us>

Hey Andy,

It’s been pretty warm this week up here as well! We hit 76 yesterday and will probably see that again 

today. Then hopefully we’ll see some needed rain this weekend.

I can answer your questions to the first piece of information that you need. For GRC, modeling was 

based on projected actual emissions. Re-entrainment of dust was factored into the modeling analysis by 

modeling with volume sources for truck traffic-related re-entrainment of dust.

Hopefully this answers your questions. Let me know if you need additional information. Thanks!

Melissa Sheffer

Research Scientist

Risk Evaluation & Air Modeling Unit

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)

520 Lafayette Rd. N., Saint Paul, MN 55155

Office #: (651) 757-2718, Email: Melissa.Sheffer@state.mn.us
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year
Ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") by Applied Spectrum Technologies, Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  November 30, 2003                     /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark R. Littell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rupert Valentine SENIOR, Appellee.

No. 81-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 7, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellant.

James Ryan, North Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

*1037PER CURIAM.

The trial court suppressed the product of a warrantless United States Customs search on the ground that it was not supported by reasonable suspicion. The defendant has now confessed error in the light of our subsequent decision in *State v. Smith,*399 So.2d 22 (Fla.3d DCA 1981) that there is no such requirement. Accord, *United States*v. *Sandler,*644 F.2d 1163 (5th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the order under review is

Reversed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3177

To repeal the consent of Congress to the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 1996

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Mr. OBEY) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To repeal the consent of Congress to the Northeast

Interstate Dairy Compact, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONSENT OF CONGRESS TO

4 NORTHEAST INTERSTATE DAIRY COMPACT.

5 Section 147 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement

6 and Reform Act of 1996 is repealed.

Æ
§ 901.12 Exemptions. ( a ) The preceding sections of this part, to the extent they reflect remedies or procedures prescribed by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, such as administrative offset, use of credit bureaus, contracting for collection agencies, and interest and related charges, do not apply to debts arising under, or payments made under, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*), except to the extent provided under 42 U.S.C. 404 and 31 U.S.C. 3716(c); or the tariff laws of the United States. These remedies and procedures, however, may be authorized with respect to debts that are exempt from the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, to the extent that they are authorized under some other statute or the common law.
( b ) This section should not be construed as prohibiting the use of these authorities or requirements when collecting debts owed by persons employed by agencies administering the laws cited in paragraph (a) of this section unless the debt arose under those laws.