alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Former Ecuadorian President Bucaram for Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Designation of Former Ecuadorian President Bucaram for Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

March 9, 2022

The United States is designating former Ecuadorian President Abdalá Jaime Bucaram Ortiz, Sr. due to his involvement in significant corruption, including misappropriation of public funds, accepting bribes, and interfering with public processes.  During his tenure as the president of Ecuador, Bucaram engaged in multiple corrupt acts, including accepting bribes and stealing public funds.  Former President Bucaram has not yet faced accountability for his betrayal of the public trust.

This public designation is made under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2021, as carried forward by the Continued Appropriations Act, 2022.  Under this authority, designated officials of foreign governments involved in significant corruption and their immediate family members are ineligible for entry into the United States.  The Department is also designating Bucaram’s spouse, María Rosa Pulley Vergara, and sons Jacobo Abdalá Bucaram Pulley, Abdalá Jaime Bucaram Pulley, and Michel Abdalá Bucaram Pulley.

This designation reaffirms the commitment of the United States to combat corruption that undermines the Ecuadorian people’s faith in its democratic institutions.  We stand with all Ecuadorians in support of democracy and the rule of law and against those who undermine these principles for personal gain.

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCorruptionEcuadorOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1255 Benchmarks for cost measures. ( a ) For the CY 2015 payment adjustment period, the benchmark for each cost measure is the national mean of the performance rates calculated among all groups of physicians for which beneficiaries are attributed to the group of physicians that are subject to the value-based payment modifier. In calculating the national benchmark, groups of physicians' performance rates are weighted by the number of beneficiaries used to calculate the group of physician's performance rate.
( b ) Beginning with the CY 2016 payment adjustment period, the benchmark for each cost measure is the national mean of the performance rates calculated among all groups and solo practitioners that meet the minimum number of cases for that measure under § 414.1265(a). In calculating the national benchmark, groups and solo practitioners' performance rates are weighted by the number of beneficiaries used to calculate the group or solo practitioner's performance rate.
[78 FR 74821, Dec. 10, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 68007, Nov. 13, 2014; 80 FR 71384, Nov. 16, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the
undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated:  June 14, 2005                    /s/ Thomas V. Geimer
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Thomas V. Geimer
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. R. CO. v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 251 U. S., 546.]

Decided March 1, 1920.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below.

*Per curiam:*

Affirmed upon the authority of Atchison,

*Topeka do Santa Fe Ry. Co.*v. *United*States, 225 U. S., 640.
693 A.2d 584

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Donald J. BLASIOLI, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 5, 1997.

Reconsideration Denied Aug. 8, 1997.

Timothy Paul Dawson, Adamsburg, for petitioner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to whether DNA statistical evidence using the product rule was admissible at trial. This case is to be orally argued.
HomeUkraine

# Ukraine

1741 items

        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Olena Removska of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Hyatt Regency HotelKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Virtual Remarks to Embassy Kyiv Staff	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021America HouseKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC Andrea Mitchell Reports	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Hyatt Regency HotelKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Olena Frolyak of ICTV	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Hyatt Regency HotelKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba	  May 6, 2021 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Office of the President of UkraineKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Virtual Roundtable on Reform and Anticorruption	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021America HouseKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Ukrainian Prime Minister Shmyhal	  May 6, 2021 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Government House, Cabinet Ministers of UkraineKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Members of the Ukrainian Rada	  May 6, 2021 

previous page1…162163164165166…175next page

Back to Top
# C_2006096EN.01000603.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgerichts Stuttgart by order of that court of 7 February 2006 in Raiffeisenbank Mutlangen eG v Roland Schabel, other parties: 1. President of the Landgericht Unkel (Regional Court, Unkel), 2. District Auditor Stiglmair

(Case C-99/06)

(2006/C 96/11)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Oberlandesgerichts Stuttgart of 7 February 2006, received at the Court Registry on 21 February 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Raiffeisenbank Mutlangen eG and Roland Schabel, other parties: 1. President of the Landgericht Unkel (Regional Court, Unkel), 2. District Auditor Stiglmair on the following question:

Is Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985 (1), to be interpreted as meaning that the charges of a notary employed as a civil servant for the drawing up of a notarially attested act recording a transaction covered by that directive constitute taxes for the purposes of that directive where, first, under the relevant national legislation, also notaries who are civil servants may be authorised to practise and are themselves owed the charges in question, and, second, although the notaries who are employed as civil servants have to remit to the Treasury, out of the fees for the recording of transactions in matters of company law covered by that directive, only a fixed reimbursement for expenses in the amount of 15 % of those fees, they must, in respect of other activities, remit to the Treasury charges exceeding a (fixed) reimbursement for expenses, which the State uses to fund its activities.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 156, p. 23.

1

---
Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner

has not met his burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted. 

### See id. We therefore deny the petition. 

### See NRAP 21(b)(1); 

### Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851 (explaining that the decision to grant writ relief is within this court's discretion).

It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons



# .04 9A Douglas
Saitta cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Leslie Ellen Crouser Washoe District Court Clerk J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
# Mauritius

49 items

        -    Report  		Mauritius	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritius	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritius	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (14-829.1) – Agreement for the Exchange of Information Relating to Taxes	  August 29, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (14-829) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  August 29, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (07-1025) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Their Customs Administrations	  October 25, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (03-630.2) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  June 30, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (12912) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  May 26, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritius (12868) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  June 13, 1997 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended February 25, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kerry Mustoe, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|/s/ Kerry Mustoe                                                                  
|Kerry Mustoe                                                                      
|Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: March 22, 2006                                                             

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 412.6 Cost reporting periods subject to the prospective payment systems. ( a ) *Initial cost reporting period for each prospective payment system.* ( 1 ) Each subject hospital is paid under the prospective payment system for operating costs for inpatient hospital services effective with the hospital's first cost reporting period beginning on or after October 1, 1983 and for inpatient capital-related costs effective with the hospital's first cost reporting period beginning on or after October 1, 1991.
( 2 ) The hospital is paid the applicable prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs and capital-related costs for each discharge occurring on or after the first day of its first cost reporting period subject to the applicable prospective payment system.
( 3 ) If a discharged beneficiary was admitted to the hospital before the first day of the hospital's first cost reporting period subject to the prospective payment system for inpatient operating costs, the reasonable costs of services furnished before that day are paid under the cost reimbursement provisions of part 413 of this chapter. For such discharges, the amount otherwise payable under the applicable prospective payment rate is reduced by the amount paid on a reasonable cost basis for inpatient hospital services furnished to that beneficiary during the hospital stay. If the amount paid under reasonable cost exceeds the inpatient operating prospective payment amount, the reduction is limited to the inpatient operating prospective payment amount.
( b ) *Changes in cost reporting periods.* CMS recognizes a change in a hospital's cost reporting period made after November 30, 1982 only if the change has been requested in writing by the hospital and approved by the intermediary in accordance with § 413.24(f)(3) of this chapter.
[57 FR 39819, Sept. 1, 1992]
#### JOSEPH PLISKY, RESPONDENT, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT.

Submitted May 26, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the respondent, *Alexander Simpson.*

For the appellant, *Collins & Corbin.*

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancelloe, Pabkeb, Case, Donges, Peeskie, Postee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raefekty, Hague, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification Pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)




The undersigned, as the chief executive
officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 11th day of March,
2009.







/s/ M. Burke Welsh,
      Jr.M.
      Burke Welsh, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive
Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2019

___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Shellie Lee Langmade, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 13, 2000 Filed: December 29, 2000

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shellie Lee Langmade pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. The presentence report (PSR) assigned Langmade three criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1 resulting in a criminal history category of II, but the district court departed downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 to a criminal history c ategory of I, finding category II overstated the seriousness of Langmade's past criminal conduct. Although Langmade's sentencing range was then 70-87 months, the amount of drugs involved triggered a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment. At sentencing, Langmade argued she was eligible for relief under-2-

the "safety valve," U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, which requires a district court to sentence a defendant within the applicable guidelines range regardless of any statutory minimum sentence if, among other things, the defendant does not have more than one criminal history point "as determined under the sentencing guidelines." U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(1). The district court decided that given its downward departure to criminal history category I under § 4A.1.3, it could apply the safety valve in § 5C1.2. Although we had held otherwise in United States v. Moog , 94 F.3d 649 (8th Cir. 1996), the district court declined to follow our unpublished opinion. The Government appeals. Our unpublisheddecisions are binding precedent that district courts in this circuit must follow. See Anastasoff

v. United States , 223 F.3d 898, 899 (8th Cir. 2000). Even according to our more recent published case law, the district court's reduction of Langmade's criminal history category under § 4A1.3 does not delete criminal history points for the purposes of the safety valve. See United States v. Webb , 218 F.3d 877, 881 (8th Cir. 2000). Because Langmade was properly charged with three criminal history points under § 4A.1.1, she does not qualify for the safety valve reduction under § 5C1.2. See id. at 882. We thus reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3186

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 1655

‘‘Sammy L. Davis Federal Building’’.Woodson Road in Overland, Missouri, as the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3186

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 1655 Woodson

Road in Overland, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sammy L. Davis

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3186 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 1655 Woodson Road

3 in Overland, Missouri, shall be known and designated as

4 the ‘‘Sammy L. Davis Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Sammy L. Davis Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
<page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

         WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO 18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350


                            CERITFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of PurchaseSoft, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin A. Yanoscik, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, solely for
the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company as of August 31, 2006.

/s/ Kevin A. Yanoscik
----------------------------
Kevin A. Yanoscik, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
Dated: May 23, 2008
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Presidential Associates I Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.







Date:
      May 15, 2008
              /s/ Eggert
      DagbjartssonEggert
      DagbjartssonChief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      May 15, 2008
              /s/ Andrew
      PragueAndrew
      PragueChief
      Financial Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Dedicates New U.S. Embassy in Guatemala City, Guatemala

# 									Department of State Dedicates New U.S. Embassy in Guatemala City, Guatemala							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 16, 2023

In an important symbol of our enduring friendship with Guatemala, U.S. Ambassador William Popp and Overseas Buildings Operation’s (OBO) Director Will Moser officially dedicated the new U.S. Embassy Guatemala City on March 16.

The new embassy is located on a 9.4-acre site in the eastern foothills of the Valle de la Ermita, southeast of the city’s historic center, and provides a secure, modern, and resilient platform for U.S. diplomacy in Guatemala. It incorporates numerous sustainable features to conserve resources and reduce operating costs, including the use of photovoltaic panels, native vegetation, and on-site wastewater treatment and reuse.

The Miller Hull Partnership of Seattle was the design architect for the project, and B.L. Harbert International of Birmingham, Alabama, constructed the complex, with Page of Washington, D.C., as architect of record. Roughly $115 million was infused into the local economy over the course of construction. The embassy was built by over 2,600 U.S. and Guatemalan workers with the support of 450 local companies.

Learn more about the project here.

Since the start of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program in 1999, OBO has completed 176 new diplomatic facilities. OBO currently has more than 50 active projects in the design phase or under construction worldwide.

OBO provides safe, secure, functional, and resilient facilities that represent the U.S. government to the host nation and that support U.S. diplomats in advancing U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad.

For further information, please contact OBO’s External Affairs Director Neda Brown at OBO-External-Affairs@state.gov or visit www.state.gov/obo.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEmbassies and ConsulatesGuatemalaOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top