### 52818 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2013 / Notices

26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69919 (July 2, 2013), 78 FR 41168.

4 See comment letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, from Darren Story, CFA, Student Options, LLC, dated July 12, 2013; and from David Spack, Chief Compliance Officer, Casey Securities, LLC, dated August 2, 2013.

5 See comment letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, from Janet McGinness, EVP & Corporate Secretary, NYSE Euronext, dated August 19, 2013.

6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31). number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BATS– 2013–046 and should be submitted on or before September 16, 2013.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 26 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–20746 Filed 8–23–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION** 

**Release No. 34–70235; File No. SR– NYSEMKT–2013–59]** 

**Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Designation of a**  **Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule Change Amending**  **Rule 965NY, Which Governs NDX and RUT Combination Orders** 

August 20, 2013.

On June 21, 2013, NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to amend Rule 965NY, which governs NDX and RUT Combination Orders. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on July 9, 2013. 3 The Commission received two comment letters on this proposal 4 and a response letter from the Exchange. 5

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 6 provides that within 45 days of the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The 45th day for this filing is August 23, 2013. The Commission is now extending the time period for
Commission action.

The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider this proposed rule change, the comment letters that have been submitted in connection with this proposed rule change, and the Exchange’s response letter.

Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 7 designates October 7, 2013 as the date by which the Commission should either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR–NYSEMKT–2013–59).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–20678 Filed 8–23–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Meeting of the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group Aviation**  **Rulemaking Committee**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation.

**ACTION :**  Notice of meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Park Service (NPS), in accordance with the National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000, as amended, announce the next meeting of the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group (NPOAG) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC). This notification provides the date, format, and agenda for the meeting.

Date and Location: The NPOAG ARC will hold a meeting on September 19, 2013. The meeting will be conducted as a telephone conference call. The meeting will be held from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time. This NPOAG meeting will be open to the public. Interested persons may listen in on the conference call (see Public Participation at the Meeting).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Keith Lusk, AWP–1SP, Special Programs Staff, Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region Headquarters, P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009–2007, telephone: (310) 725–3808, email: Keith.Lusk@ faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

The National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 (NPATMA), enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law 106–181, required the establishment of the NPOAG within one year after its enactment. The Act requires that the NPOAG be a balanced group of representatives of general aviation, commercial air tour operations, environmental concerns, and Native American tribes. The Administrator of the FAA and the Director of NPS (or their designees) serve as ex officio members of the group. Representatives of the Administrator and Director serve alternating 1-year terms as chairman of the advisory group.

The duties of the NPOAG include providing advice, information, and recommendations to the FAA Administrator and the NPS Director on: Implementation of Public Law 106–181; quiet aircraft technology; other measures that might accommodate interests to visitors of national parks;


### 52819 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2013 / Notices

and at the request of the Administrator and the Director, on safety, environmental, and other issues related to commercial air tour operations over national parks or tribal lands.
Agenda for the September 19, 2013, NPOAG Meeting

The agenda for the meeting will include, but is not limited to, the following: Review of the new air tour reporting requirements, status on current voluntary agreement efforts, and review and approval of the meeting minutes from the May 16, 2012 NPOAG meeting in Rapid City, SD.
Public Participation at the Meeting

This NPOAG meeting will be conducted as a telephone conference call. Members of the public will be able to listen in on the proceedings. Information regarding how the public may access this conference call in a ‘‘listen mode’’ will be posted on the FAA’s ATMP Web site at http:// www.faa.gov/about/office

_ org/ headquarters

_ offices/arc/programs/air

_ tour

_ management

_

plan/ by September 12, 2013. Other supplementary meeting information may also be posted on the ATMP Web site. You may also find out how to access the call by contacting Mr. Keith Lusk (contact information is provided above in **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT** ).
Record of the Meeting

If you are unable to participate in this NPOAG meeting conference call, a summary record of the meeting will be made available at a later date under the NPOAG section of the FAA’s ATMP Web site at http://www.faa.gov/about/ office

_ org/headquarters

_ offices/arc/ programs/air

_ tour

_ management

_

plan/ or through the Special Programs Staff, Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009–207, telephone (310) 725–3808.

Issued in Hawthorne, CA, on August 20,

2013. Keith Lusk, Program Manager, Special Programs Office, Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 2013–20728 Filed 8–23–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Highway Administration**

**Environmental Impact Statement: Interstate 81 Viaduct Project**  **(Onondaga County, New York)**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), United States Department of Transportation (USDOT).

**ACTION :**  Notice of intent.

**SUMMARY :**  FHWA, as lead agency, is issuing this notice to advise the public that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the proposed infrastructure improvements of Interstate 81 (I–81) in the greater Syracuse area, Onondaga County, New York.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Debra Nelson, New York State Department of Transportation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12232, Telephone: (518) 457–7256; or Jonathan McDade, New York Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building, 7th Floor, Room 719, Clinton Avenue and North Pearl Street, Albany, New York 12207, Telephone: (518) 431–

4127.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The FHWA, in cooperation with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on a proposal to correct deficiencies with the I–81 viaduct in the City of Syracuse, Onondaga County, New York while taking into consideration opportunities for addressing community concerns related to this portion of I–81.

In its current condition, the I–81 viaduct is in a deteriorating state of repair and does not meet current design standards. The purpose of the project is to address these structural deficiencies and nonstandard highway features while creating an improved corridor through the City of Syracuse that meets transportation needs and provides the transportation infrastructure to support long-range planning efforts.

To address these issues, the EIS will evaluate alternatives that meet the goals of improving safety and creating an efficient regional and local transportation system within and through greater Syracuse; and providing transportation solutions that enhance the livability, sustainability, and economic vitality of greater Syracuse.

Alternatives under consideration include the no-build alternative; rehabilitation or reconstruction of the existing highway infrastructure; conversion of the existing highway to an alternative non-interstate highway facility (e.g., at-grade roadway); and replacement of existing infrastructure with a below-grade facility (e.g., highway tunnel, or depressed highway) The NEPA documentation will consider this list of alternatives and evaluations conducted to date as well as any other reasonable and prudent alternatives identified during scoping. The EIS will consider all reasonable alternatives that meet the project purpose and need and are considered feasible based on engineering, cost, and social, economic, and environmental considerations.

Letters describing the project, alternatives under consideration, and opportunities for agency and public involvement in the process will be sent to the appropriate Cooperating and Participating Agencies and to private organizations and citizens that have expressed an interest in this action. The public and agencies will be offered an opportunity to comment on the Purpose and Need, range of alternatives, level of detail, methodologies, etc. This will be accomplished through public and agency outreach which will consist of: A formal public scoping meeting to be held in Syracuse, New York in November 2013; a series of public/ stakeholder meetings; a public hearing; meetings with the applicable Cooperating and Participating Agencies; and meeting with the Section 106 Consulting Parties including federally recognized Indian tribes. The Draft EIS will also be available for public and agency review and comment. FHWA and NYSDOT will provide public notification of the time and location of the meetings and hearings.

The meetings will be accessible to persons with disabilities. If special services, such as an interpreter or sign language services, are needed, please contact Debra Nelson, New York State Department of Transportation.

To ensure that a full range of issues related to this proposed action are addressed and all significant issues are identified, comments and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be directed to the FHWA or NYSDOT at the addresses provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)