alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert V. Condon, Chief Financial Officer of Merrimac Industries, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Annual Report’’), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                             |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Robert V. Condon            Robert V. CondonChief Financial OfficerApril 16, 2007

----
#### § 416.2 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Ambulatory surgical center* or *ASC* means any distinct entity that operates exclusively for the purpose of providing surgical services to patients not requiring hospitalization and in which the expected duration of services would not exceed 24 hours following an admission. The entity must have an agreement with CMS to participate in Medicare as an ASC, and must meet the conditions set forth in subparts B and C of this part.

*ASC services* means, for the period before January 1, 2008, facility services that are furnished in an ASC, and beginning January 1, 2008, means the combined facility services and covered ancillary services that are furnished in an ASC in connection with covered surgical procedures.

*Covered ancillary services* means items and services that are integral to a covered surgical procedure performed in an ASC as provided in § 416.164(b), for which payment may be made under § 416.171 in addition to the payment for the facility services.

*Covered surgical procedures* means those surgical procedures furnished before January 1, 2008, that meet the criteria specified in § 416.65 and those surgical procedures furnished on or after January 1, 2008, that meet the criteria specified in § 416.166.

*Facility services* means for the period before January 1, 2008, services that are furnished in connection with covered surgical procedures performed in an ASC, and beginning January 1, 2008, means services that are furnished in connection with covered surgical procedures performed in an ASC as provided in § 416.164(a) for which payment is included in the ASC payment established under § 416.171 for the covered surgical procedure.

[56 FR 8843, Mar. 1, 1991; 56 FR 23022, May 20, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 68226, Nov. 24, 2006; 72 FR 42544, Aug. 2, 2007; 73 FR 68811, Nov. 18, 2008]
§ 423.159 Electronic prescription drug program. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: *Dispenser* means a person or other legal entity licensed, registered, or otherwise permitted by the jurisdiction in which the person practices or the entity is located to provide drug products for human use by prescription in the course of professional practice.
*Electronic media* has the same meaning given this term in 45 CFR 160.103.
*E-prescribing* means the transmission using electronic media, of prescription or prescription-related information between a prescriber, dispenser, pharmacy benefit manager, or health plan, either directly or through an intermediary, including an e-prescribing network. E-prescribing includes, but is not limited to, two-way transmissions between the point of care and the dispenser.
*Electronic prescription drug program* means a program that provides for e-prescribing for covered Part D drugs prescribed for Part D eligible individuals.
*Prescriber* means a physician, dentist, or other person licensed, registered, or otherwise permitted by the U.S. or the jurisdiction in which he or she practices, to issue prescriptions for drugs for human use.
*Prescription-related information* means information regarding eligibility for drug benefits, medication history, or related health or drug information for Part D eligible individuals.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Requirement.* Part D sponsors must support and comply with electronic prescription standards relating to covered Part D drugs for Part D enrollees developed by CMS once final standards are effective.
( d ) *Promotion of electronic prescribing by MA-PD plans.* An MA organization offering an MA-PD plan may provide for a separate or differential payment to a participating physician that prescribes covered Part D drugs in accordance with electronic prescription standards, including initial standards and final standards established by CMS once final standards are effective. Any payments must be in compliance with applicable Federal and State laws related to fraud and abuse, including the physician self-referral prohibition (section 1877 of the Act) and the Federal anti kickback statute (section 1128B(b) of the Act).
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 67593, Nov. 7, 2005]
# C_2006090EN.01000201.xml

| 13.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4066 — CVC/SLEC)

(2006/C 90/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4066. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4066. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006108EN.01001901.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/19

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Eurodrive v OHIM

(Case T-31/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark euroMASTER - Earlier national word marks EUROMASTER - No similarity between the goods or services - Partial dismissal of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 108/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Eurodrive Services and Distribution NV (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) (represented by: E. Chávarri and A. Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jesús Gómez Frías (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2003 (Cases R 419/2001-1 and R 530/2001-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Jesús Gómez Frías and Eurodrive Services and Distribution NV

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 24.7.2004.

1

---
# Sample csa2sac.in file
Results 	-- directory for SAC input and output files -- must be created before running csa2sac. Note that the SAC program will not overwrite existing files, so they must be deletetd or renamed before running csa2sac or SAC.
SACtemplate.txt -- cross section input file -- this file is in SAC input format, WSEs in this file aren't used
stagedata.txt	-- stage input in format [Julian date/time] CSA1 CSA2 CSA3
3		-- number of cross sections
§ 423.1064 Notice and effect of dismissal and right to request review. ( a ) Notice of the ALJ's dismissal action is mailed to the parties. The notice advises the affected party of its right to request that the dismissal be vacated as provided in 423.1066.
( b ) The dismissal of a request for hearing is binding unless it is vacated by the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Members of the Russia-Based Trickbot Cybercrime Network

# 									Designating Members of the Russia-Based Trickbot Cybercrime Network							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

September 7, 2023

The United States, in coordination with the United Kingdom, is taking action today against the Trickbot group, a Russia-based cybercrime network that has targeted the U.S. Government and U.S. companies, including hospitals.

The Department of the Treasury sanctioned 11 key actors in the network’s operation. Concurrently, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed indictments against nine individuals in connection with the Trickbot malware and other ransomware schemes, including seven of the individuals designated today.

Today’s action follows our February 2023 joint U.S.-UK cyber designations of other members of the Trickbot group and represents our continued commitment to targeting and combating ransomware actors. The United States will continue to use all available tools to target Russia-based cybercrime and counter the threat posed by ransomware in coordination with national and international partners.

*Today’s action is being taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13694, as amended by E.O. 13757, for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, an activity described in subsection (a)(ii) of section 1 of E.O. 13694, as amended. For more information on this designation, see Treasury’spress release.*

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCyber SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctionsTechnologyUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21948]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  September 15, 2009--10 a.m.

Place:  800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

Status:  A portion of the meeting will be in open session and the 
remainder of the meeting will be in closed session

Matters To Be Considered

Open Session

    1. Docket No. 06-01: Worldwide Relocations, Inc.; et al.--Possible 
Violations of Sections 8, 10, and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and 
the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21, and 520.3--
Request for Extension of Time.
    2. Docket No. 02-15: Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility.
    3. Statutory Re-codification of 46 CFR.
    4. FY 2009 Budget Status Update.

Closed Session

    1. Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential 
Impact on Stakeholders.
    2. Passenger Vessel Operator Regulatory Initiatives.
    3. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.
    Contact Person for More Information: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21948 Filed 9-8-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.335 Payment for EPO furnished to a home dialysis patient for use in the home. ( a ) Prior to January 1, 2011, payment for EPO used at home by a home dialysis patient is made only to either a Medicare approved ESRD facility or a supplier of home dialysis equipment and supplies. Effective January 1, 2011, payment for EPO used at home by a home dialysis patient is made only to a Medicare-approved ESRD facility in accordance with the per treatment payment as defined in § 413.230.
( b ) After January 1, 2011, a home and self training amount is added to the per treatment base rate for adult and pediatric patients as defined in § 413.230
[75 FR 49202, Aug. 12, 2010]
Exhibit
      32.2





Certification
of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company and its results of operations as of and
for the periods covered therein.








/s/ J. Kimbrough DavisJ.
      Kimbrough DavisExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer





Date:
August 8, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2006131EN.01003901.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 April 2006 — Saiwa v OHMI

(Case T-344/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a figurative mark including the word element ‘SELEZIONE ORO Barilla’ - Opposition - Earlier word marks ORO and ORO SAIWA - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Opposition rejected)

(2006/C 131/72)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Saiwa SpA (Genoa Italy) (represented by: G. Sena, P. Tarchini, J.-P. Karsenty and M. Karsenty-Ricard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: M. Capostagno and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Barilla Alimentare SpA (Parma, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti and S. Bergia, lawyers)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 July 2003 (R 480/2002-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Saiwa SpA and Barilla Alimentare SpA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 13.12.2003.

1

---
#### Gail Baker WARE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. WW-384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 11, 1981.

Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ware was adjudged guilty of burglary and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for three years. The sentence provided that eighteen (18) months were to be served in prison followed by three and one-half (8*6) years probation. Ware challenges the legality of this sentence.

Subsequent to the sentencing hearing herein, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in *Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission,*396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981). In *Villery,*the court held that:

> [IJncarceration, pursuant to the split sentence alternatives found in sections 948.-01(4) and 948.03(3), which equals or exceeds one year is invalid. This applies to incarceration as a condition of probation *as well as to incarceration followed by a specified period of probation. . . .*[T]his decision applies retroactively.

*Id.*at 1111 (emphasis supplied). Accordingly, the sentence is reversed, and this cause is remanded for resentencing pursuant to the guidelines set forth in *Villery, supra.*

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### Floyd LISTER, Corporate Group Service, Inc., and Certified Pulpwood Dealers Self-Insurance Fund, Appellants, v. Lavere WALKER, Appellee.

No. AC-292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Thomas J. Maida of McConnaughhay & Roland, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Steve M. Watkins of Watkins, Hill & Marts, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order directing appellants to pay workers’ compensation benefits to appellee pursuant to a deputy commissioner’s order directing such payments if this Court had not ruled upon the appeal of that order within 60 days from the trial court’s order. At the time the trial court entered its order, it did not have jurisdiction over the question of whether or not compensation should be paid to appellee because that question was before this Court on appeal from the deputy commissioner’s order. This Court has now ruled that compensation was not payable to appellee *(Lister, et a1 v. Walker,*(Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Case No. ZZ-227, opinion filed February 16, 1982.

Reversed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Fisher, Julie D – Republic of Cyprus-June-2022

# 									Fisher, Julie D – Republic of Cyprus-June-2022							

Certificate of Competency

June 27, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:Republic of Cyprus

CANDIDATE:Julie D. Fisher

Julie D. Fisher, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as the U.S. Special Envoy for Belarus based in Vilnius, Lithuania.  In 2020, she was confirmed as the first U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Belarus since 2008.  Fisher previously served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Western Europe and the European Union in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.  Before that, she was the Deputy Permanent Representative of the U.S. Mission to NATO.  Earlier, she was the Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.  Prior to that, Fisher served as the Director of the State Department’s Operations Center.  Other assignments include a detail to NATO’s international staff as Deputy Director of the Private Office and assignments at U.S. embassies in Georgia, Ukraine, and Russia, as well as tours at the National Security Council, the Bureaus for European and Eurasian Affairs and Near Eastern Affairs, and the Secretary of State’s Executive Secretariat Staff.  Fisher’s extensive experience working on European and NATO issues and her management experience and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams make her a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Cyprus.  

Fisher has received numerous performance awards, including two Senior Foreign Service Performance Awards and six Superior Honor awards.  Fisher earned a Bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Master’s degree from the School of International and Public Affairs at Princeton University. She speaks Russian and French.

Back to Top
#### Clarence DAVIS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES et al., Appellee.

No. 58849.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 26, 1980.

Guy C. Hill, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

William M. Holland of Holland & Smith, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We do not have jurisdiction in this case. The trial court specifically refrained from passing on the constitutionality of § 742.041(2), Fla.Stat. (1977). It then ordered the father to pay support pursuant to § 742.041(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). The Fourth District Court of Appeal transferred this case upon appellant’s motion which asserted that the trial court initially and directly passed upon the constitutionality of the statute. Even under the inherency doctrine, the constitutional challenge must have been to a controlling statute and the decision as to the statute’s validity necessary to the determination of the case. *Harrell’s Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority,*111 So.2d 439 (Fla.1959). The cause is transferred to the district court of appeal.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.

        COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                           Exhibit (12)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                        Years Ended December 31,               

                                         (Thousands of Dollars)

                           1995        1994        1993       1992       1991
<S>                      <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>      
Net earnings             $267,941    $223,340    $203,297   $164,204   $130,880


Add:

  Fixed charges:

  Interest including
  amortization of 
  debt expense            359,079     259,605     242,440    236,337    255,075

  One-third of
  rentals*                 10,317       9,747      10,146      8,207      7,209

  Total fixed 
  charges                 369,396     269,352     252,586    244,544    262,284

  Provision for
  income taxes            147,873     116,900     104,228     84,334     63,985


Total net earnings,
  fixed charges and
  income taxes - 
  "Earnings"             $785,210    $609,592    $560,111   $493,082   $457,149


Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges           2.13        2.26        2.22       2.02       1.74


</TABLE>
*One-third of rentals is deemed representative of the interest factor.