alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ***EXHIBIT 32.2***

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                    Dean AntonisTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate: July 15, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 16,488.

#### The Midland Railway Company et al. *v.*State, ex rel. Harrison, Treasurer of Boone County.

Appellate *Court.*— Jurisdiction.—■Money *Demand.*— Where the amount in controversy on a money demand is less than $3,600, the jurisdiction, on appeal, is in the Appellate Court.

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

*280Filed June 21, 1894.

*W. R. Crawford, 8. O. Bayless*and *C. G. Guenther,*for appellants.

í3. *M. Ralston*and *M. Keefe,*for appellee.

McCabe, J.

This was an action by appellee against the appellants, on a delivery bond. The amount of damages claimed in the complaint was for less than $3,500. The finding and judgment against appellants were for. $2,702.46. To reverse this judgment the appeal is brought.

It being an action seeking the recovery of a money judgment only, and the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs, being less than $3,500, exclusive jurisdiction of this appeal is in the Appellate Court. Acts 1893, p. 29, section 1, subd. 3.

The cause is therefore transferred to the Appellate Court.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.508 Modification or termination of contract by mutual consent. ( a ) A contract may be modified or terminated at any time by written mutual consent. ( 1 ) If the contract is terminated by mutual consent, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the MA organization must provide notice to its Medicare enrollees and the general public as provided in § 422.512(b)(2) and (b)(3).
( 2 ) If the contract is modified by mutual consent, the MA organization must notify its Medicare enrollees of any changes that CMS determines are appropriate for notification within timeframes specified by CMS.
( 3 ) If the organization submits a request to end the term of its contract after the deadline provided in § 422.506(a)(2)(i), the contract may be terminated by mutual consent in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. CMS may mutually consent to the contract termination if the contract termination does not negatively affect the administration of the Medicare program.
( b ) If the contract terminated by mutual consent is replaced the day following such termination by a new MA contract, the MA organization is not required to provide the notice specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Agreement to limit new MA applications.* As a condition of the consent to a mutual termination CMS will require, as a provision of the termination agreement language prohibiting the MA organization from applying for new contracts or service area expansions for a period of 2 years, absent circumstances warranting special consideration. This prohibition may apply regardless of the product type, contract type or service area of the previous contract.
( d ) *Prohibition against Part C program participation by organizations whose owners, directors, or management employees served in a similar capacity with another organization that mutually terminated its Medicare contract within the previous 2 years.* During the same 2-year period, CMS will not contract with an organization whose covered persons also served as covered persons for the mutually terminating sponsor. A “covered person” as used in this paragraph means one of the following: ( 1 ) All owners of nonrenewal or terminated organizations who are natural persons, other than shareholders who have an ownership interest of less than 5 percent.
( 2 ) An owner in whole or part interest in any mortgage, deed of trust, note or other obligation secured (in whole or in part) by the organization, or any of the property or assets thereof, which whole or part interest is equal to or exceeds 5 percent of the total property, and assets of the organization.
( 3 ) A member of the board of directors of the entity, if the organization is organized as a corporation.
[63 FR 35099, June 26, 1998, as amended at 75 FR 19811, Apr. 15, 2010; 76 FR 21569, Apr. 15, 2011; 80 FR 7961, Feb. 12, 2015; 83 FR 16734, Apr. 16, 2018]
#### Gary Vincent COLEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-2137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1981.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Frederick C. Sake, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and BARK-DULL and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Holland v. State,*129 Fla. 363, 176 So. 169 (1937); *Taylor v. State,*139 Fla. 542, 190 So. 691 (1939); *Wetherington v. State,*263 So.2d 294 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); *Codie*v. *State,*313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975); *Bristow*v. *State,*338 So.2d 553 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *De La Cova v. State,*355 So.2d 1227 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); *Daley v. State,*374 So.2d 59 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); *Teague v. State,*390 So.2d 405 (Fla.5th DCA 1980).
#### KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 252 U. S., 147.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed*and the Supreme Court decided:

A railroad company which enters into a contract to carry the mails “ upon the conditions prescribed by law,” etc., is liable to fines or deductions from its compensation for failures to maintain its mail train schedules (Rev. Stats., secs. 3962, 4002; act of June 26, 1906, c. 3546, 34 Stat. 472).

The fact that the Post Office Department long abstained from making such deductions under Rev. Stats., sec. 3962, where delays were less than 24 hours, does not amount to construing that section as inapplicable to shorter delays.

And in any event, the right to such construction could not be claimed by a company whose contract was made soon after the Postmaster General had issued an order for deductions in future when trains arrived 15 or more minutes late a designated number of times per quarter, and soon after the approval of the act of June 26, 1906, *supra,*directing him to impose and collect reasonable fines for failure of railroads to comply with their contracts respecting the times of arrival and departure of trains.

Mr. Justice Clarke

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 1, 1920.
# C_2006054EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 March 2006

(2006/C 54/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2020 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4618 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68500 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4603 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5628 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,11 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,523 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8015 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4790 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,160 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5660 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6123 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3627 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3258 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8028 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9460 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 167,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3909 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6617 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 040,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,454 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,506 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,5780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,658 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2020

JPY

Japanese yen

139,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4618

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68500

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4603

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5628

ISK

Iceland króna

79,11

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

28,523

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8015

RON

Romanian leu

3,4790

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,160

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5660

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6123

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3627

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3258

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8028

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9460

KRW

South Korean won

1 167,50

ZAR

South African rand

7,3909

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6617

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 040,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,454

PHP

Philippine peso

61,506

RUB

Russian rouble

33,5780

THB

Thai baht

46,658

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006126EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 May 2006

(2006/C 126/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2758 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4575 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68550 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2955 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5617 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,58 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,203 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 260,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9223 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5175 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,735 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9555 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6812 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4088 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8957 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0111 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0144 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2627 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2424 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2675 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 759,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,632 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,337 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5130 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,744 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2758

JPY

Japanese yen

143,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4575

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68550

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2955

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5617

ISK

Iceland króna

92,58

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,203

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

260,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9223

RON

Romanian leu

3,5175

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,735

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9555

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6812

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4088

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8957

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0111

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0144

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,82

ZAR

South African rand

8,2627

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2424

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2675

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 759,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,632

PHP

Philippine peso

67,337

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5130

THB

Thai baht

48,744

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOMANETICS CORPORATION AS OF, AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED, NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,132,376
<SECURITIES>                                 2,470,780
<RECEIVABLES>                                  357,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                   166,000
<INVENTORY>                                    433,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,299,449
<PP&E>                                       1,074,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                 784,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,677,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          788,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,853
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,846,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,677,432
<SALES>                                      1,211,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,211,784
<CGS>                                          631,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  631,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,974,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,155,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,155,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,155,483)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.88)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

Map 25: Transportation Erosion Estimates

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other 

data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through 

digital means and may be updated without notification.

Road With High Probability

 of Excess Erosion

Road

*Note: Roads with a high probability of excess erosion

have an average erosion rate of greater than 0.75 pounds

of sediment eroding per linear foot of road. These roads

require a change in road maintenance level; options include

closure, improved design, or more frequent maintenance.

 

LEGEND

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 Other Federal

 State

 Private or Other
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Yiqing Wan                      |   |   |   |   |
| Name: Yiqing      Wan               |   |   |   |   |
| Title: Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                                     |   |   |   |   |
| Date: April      15, 2009           |   |   |   |   |

----
§ 417.840 Administrative review procedures. The HCPP must apply § 422.568 through § 422.626 of this chapter to— ( a ) Organization determinations and fast-track appeals that affect its Medicare enrollees; and
( b ) Reconsiderations, hearings, Medicare Appeals Council review, and judicial review of the organization determinations and fast-track appeals specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[75 FR 19803, Apr. 15, 2010]
§ 416.61 Scope of facility services. ( a ) *Included services.* Facility services include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Nursing, technician, and related services;
( 2 ) Use of the facilities where the surgical procedures are performed;
( 3 ) Drugs, biologicals, surgical dressings, supplies, splints, casts, and appliances and equipment directly related to the provision of surgical procedures;
( 4 ) Diagnostic or therapeutic services or items directly related to the provision of a surgical procedure;
( 5 ) Administrative, recordkeeping and housekeeping items and services; and
( 6 ) Materials for anesthesia.
( 7 ) Intra-ocular lenses (IOLs).
( 8 ) Supervision of the services of an anesthetist by the operating surgeon.
( b ) *Excluded services.* Facility services do not include items and services for which payment may be made under other provisions of part 405 of this chapter, such as physicians' services, laboratory, X-ray or diagnostic procedures (other than those directly related to performance of the surgical procedure), prosthetic devices (except IOLs), ambulance services, leg, arm, back and neck braces, artificial limbs, and durable medical equipment for use in the patient's home. In addition, they do not include anesthetist services furnished on or after January 1, 1989.
[56 FR 8844, Mar. 1, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 33899, July 31, 1992]
#### § 598.311 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
693 A.2d 200

#### Josephine MILIA, Appellee, v. James A. PARRISH, Jr., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Jan. 28, 1997.

Decided May 15, 1997.

Robert M. Davison, Bethlehem, for James A. Parrish.

Chrystyna M. Fenchen, Bethlehem, and John J. Keller, Allentown, for Josephine Milia.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 1997, the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
#### Tommy Joe JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. VV-292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 1981.

W. Paul Thompson of Thompson, Adkin-son & Beasley, DeFuniak Springs, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Justice appeals the trial judge’s order finding him guilty of indirect criminal contempt. The State of Florida has not filed an answer brief. We reverse.

In February, 1979, Justice purchased an advertisement in the Banner, a newspaper which circulated in Washington County. The ad consisted of a letter, addressed to the Chief Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, containing a reference to alleged extra-judicial activities of another judge *1038within the circuit. While we do not condone scurrilous allegations regarding a judge’s private life, under the facts of this case we must agree with Justice that publishing the letter did not constitute indirect criminal contempt.

A criminal contempt is conduct that is directed against the authority and dignity of a court or of a judge acting judicially. *Ex Parte Earman,*85 Fla. 297, 95 So. 755 (1923). A publication may constitute contempt if it tends to intimidate, influence, impede, embarrass, or obstruct courts in the administration of justice in matters pending before them. *State ex rel Giblin v. Sullivan,*157 Fla. 496, 26 So.2d 509 (1946). *See also Vines v. Vines,*357 So.2d 243 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978). Although the publication in question may have been personally embarrassing to the offended judge, there is no evidence that it was directed against his judicial authority or dignity or that it tended to obstruct the administration of justice.

In an earlier contempt proceeding, stemming from the appellant’s 1977 publication of an identical letter, Justice had been admonished against “further publication of matters which in the court’s eyes tends to influence a case presently under consideration by the court.” However, the record does not indicate that the second publication of the letter tended to influence any case under consideration. Therefore, the February, 1979, publication could not constitute a contemptuous violation of the earlier order.

Accordingly, judgment is REVERSED for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board
of Directors

Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary on Forms S-8 relating to the Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Plan ( No. 333-108108) and the 2008 Restricted
Stock Plan (No. 333-152997), of our report dated February 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes in
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for the year then ended, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2009.

LOGO

Greenville, South Carolina

February 26, 2010