alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005205EN.01002201.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/22

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 June 2005

in Case T-326/03 Hippocrate Vounakis v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Prior administrative complaint - Time-limits - Public policy nature - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 205/39)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-326/03: Hippocrate Vounakis, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Wezembeek-Oppem (Belgium), represented by J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, A. Coolen and S. Orlandi, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for the annulment of the Commission's decision not to promote the applicant to grade A4 under the 2002 promotion procedure — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 29.11.2003.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.94 [Reserved]
# C_2005266EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 October 2005

(2005/C 266/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2059 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4601 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67980 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5474 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 72,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8220 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,788 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9618 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6098 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,060 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6367 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5981 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4189 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3508 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7149 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0413 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 259,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0160 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7518 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 049,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,552 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,300 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,257 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2059

JPY

Japanese yen

139,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4601

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67980

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5474

ISK

Iceland króna

72,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8220

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

29,788

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9618

RON

Romanian leu

3,6098

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,060

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6367

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5981

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4189

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3508

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7149

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0413

KRW

South Korean won

1 259,98

ZAR

South African rand

8,0160

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7518

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 049,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,552

PHP

Philippine peso

66,300

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3950

THB

Thai baht

49,257

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Elaine PAPICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 10, 1975.

Raymond 0. Gross, Phillips, McFarland, Gould & Korones, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See State v. Dent,*Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 543.

McNulty, c. j., and boardman and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Special Representative for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Pak’s Trilateral Call with Republic of Korea (ROK) Special Representative Kim and Japanese Director General Namazu

# 											Deputy Special Representative for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Pak’s Trilateral Call with Republic of Korea (ROK) Special Representative Kim and Japanese Director General Namazu									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 19, 2023

U.S. Deputy Special Representative Jung Pak held a trilateral call with Republic of Korea (ROK) Special Representative for Korean Peninsula Peace and Security Affairs Kim Gunn and Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director General for Asian and Oceanian Affairs Namazu Hiroyuki to discuss the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s (DPRK) December 17 intercontinental ballistic missile launch. They strongly condemned the launch, which violated multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions and undermined peace and stability in the region and the world.

They emphasized the importance of continuing close trilateral consultations and responses, including at the UN Security Council, to mitigate the threat posed by the DPRK.  They also called for the full implementation of all relevant UN Security Council resolutions and urged the DPRK to return to diplomatic engagement. DSR Pak reiterated the United States’ ironclad commitments to the defense of the ROK and Japan.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationDiplomacyInternational SecurityJapanNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceSouth KoreaStabilizationUnited Nations

Back to Top
ex_232215.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 


Non-Employee Director Compensation Program


 


Effective July 1, 2020, the Asensus Surgical, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Program is:


 


	
			Annual Equity Retainer(1)

				
			Annual Equity 


			Award (2)

				
			Initial Equity 


			Award (2)

			
	
			Non-Employee Director role:

				
			Dollar value

				
			Paid in equity in lieu


			of cash (2)

				
			Equity grant of stock


			options or restricted

				
			Equity grant of stock


			options or restricted

			
	
			  Baseline Board Compensation

				
			$40,000

				
			Equity issued quarterly

				
			stock units with a value

				
			options or restricted

			
	
			  Non-Executive Chair

				
			$40,000

				
			in arrears to each

				
			of $45,000. Director

				
			stock units with a value

			
	
			  Audit Committee Chair

				
			$20,000

				
			director under the Plan.

				
			can elect the form of 

				
			of $50,000. Incoming

			
	
			  Compensation Committee Chair

				
			$13,000

				
			Vested on grant.

				
			equity. Cliff vesting at

				
			director can elect the

			
	
			  CG & Nominating Committee Chair

				
			$10,000

				
			Yearly election will be

				
			first anniversary of grant

				
			form of equity. Vests

			
	
			  Audit Committee Member

				
			$ 9,000

				
			made by each director

				
			or following year’s annual 

				
			one-third of award on

			
	
			  Compensation Committee Member

				
			$ 6,000

				
			to receive grant as shares

				
			meeting date, if earlier, 

				
			each of the first three

			
	
			  CG& Nominating Committee Member

				
			$ 5,000

				
			of common stock or stock


			options

				
			subject to forfeiture if not vested.

				
			anniversaries of the date of grant.

			



 


 


	
			 

				
			(1)

				
			Annual non-employee director compensation limit of $250,000 with initial year compensation limit of $500,000 as set forth in the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).

			



 


	
			 

				
			(2)

				
			Number of shares of common stock, restricted stock units or stock options calculated using a stock price equal to the greater $1.00 or the average closing price in the 20 trading days prior to the date of grant and, for stock options, if elected by a director, a Black Scholes calculation. Stock options will have a seven year term.
#### § 599.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
# C_2006048EN.01000701.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-252/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/22/EC - Electronic communications networks and services - Universal Service - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 48/13)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-252/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Zavvos and M. Shotter) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) — ACTION for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations pursuant to Article 226 EC, brought on 14 June 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and P. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
May 11, 1971 

Honorable Joe Resweber 

County Attorney 

Opinion No. M-855 

Harris County Courthouse 

Houeton, Texas 77002 

Re: Retention of earned jury 

fees by county clerk 

deputlee. 

Dear Mr. Reeweber: 

‘.., Your request for an opinion on the above subject matter 

asks the following gueatlonr 

“Can a Deputy County Clerk of Harris 

County, who 1s pald his regular salary, retain a check received by said Deputy County 

Clerk for jury service or should he endorse 

such check over to the County Treasurer pursuant to Harris County Personnel Regulations?” 

In Attorney Oeneral’s Opinion O-6185 (#is), the conclusion wa8 reached that, 

“Jury fees, not being listed by statute, 

are not ‘feea of office’ and need not be paid 

Into the Officers Salary Fund when collected 

by a county officer. 

WY 

they 

from 

“In case8 where county employees receive 

fees In addition to their regular salaries, 

are not receiving extra salaries or wages 

the county, since jury fee8 are not considered salaries or wages. They are more In the 

nature of an allowance or gratuity. Jury service 

being a ‘duty’, the juror Is entitled to no compensation. 31 Am.Jur., Section 57, p. 5%‘. Moat 

states, however, have statutes providing a fee 

for such service.” 

Two years later, In Attorney ffeneral’s Oplnlon V-371 (1947), 

the right of state and county officers or employee8 to serve on grand 

or petit juries was recognized by this office: 

“It ha8 been held many times that -officer8 

or employee8 OS the State or County are qualified 

-4150- 
. 1 

Hon. Joe Resweber, page 2 (M-835) 

to serve as grand or petit Jurors. Edgar v. State, 

Crlm.App., 127 S.W. 1053; Ming0 v. State, Crlm. 

APP.~ 133 S.W. 882; Counts V, State, Crlm.App., 

181 S.W. 723. 

,I 

. . . 

“A state employee may receive and use fees 

received by him for..,jury service without any 

deductions In his State pay, If such person also 

discharges the duties assigned to him by the Read 

of the Department In which he worEts. If not, 

leave of absence should be granted without pay 

during euch jury service. Sec. 33 and 40, Art. 

XVI, Texas Constitution; Sec. 2(14)c Ch. 400, 

S.B. 391, Acts 50th Legislature, 1947,” 

In view of the foregoing, you are advleed that jury 

fees pald the deputy county clerk for hi8 own personal jury 

service should be retained by the deputy County clerk, Since 

there Is no obligation to return such COmPenSatlOn to the county, 

SUMMARY 

County employees who receive jury fees 

for jury service are entitled to retain such 

jury pay In addltlon to their salary a8 a county 

employee. There 18 no obligation on their part 

to return such ~ompeneatlon 

A 

the county. 

Very Cruly yours, 

Attorne$)Oeneral of Texas 

Prepared by John Reeves 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED2 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

-4151- 
Ron. .Joe Resweber, page 3 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

Wllllam J. Craig 

fflenn Brown 

Fisher Tyler 

Roland Allen 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal As8istant 

ALFRED WALSfBR 

Executive ASSiStant 

. . 

NOLA WHITE 

First AsSiStant 

(M-855) - 

-4152-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the six month period ending June 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                            375,907
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      72,915
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    458,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        458,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      458,822
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  161,706
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   165,382
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               165,382
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      165,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      277.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                      277.51
        

</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3139

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To redesignate the United States Post Office building located

at 245 Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in

Centereach, New York, as the ‘‘Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3139 RDS

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at 245

3 Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach,

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rose

5 Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rose Y. Caracappa

11 United States Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: May 23, 2005

/S/ Randall Jones
-----------------------
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer


                                       28
EXHIBIT
        23.1
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**
 **PUBLIC
        ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration
        Statements of PAB Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-74819, 333-89527,
        333-107039 and 333-137316) and Form S-3D (33-74080) of our reports, dated
        February 27, 2007 of our audits of the consolidated financial statements
        and
        internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report
        on
        Form 10-K of PAB Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
        2006.
  
 /s/
                  Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC
 
 
 Albany,
        Georgia
 March
        12,
        2007
# C_2006060EN.01002601.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/26

---

Appeal brought on 9 January 2006 by Beatriz Salvador García against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-205/02 Beatriz Salvador García v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-7/06 P)

(2006/C 60/49)

Language of the case: Spanish

An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-205/02 Beatriz Salvador García v Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 January 2006 by Beatriz Salvador García, represented by R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers.

Beatriz Salvador García

Commission of the European Communities

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| (1) | Declare this appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declare this appeal admissible;

| (2) | Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 and, if appropriate, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 and, if appropriate, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance;

| (3) | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This appeal is based on a single plea: infringement by the CFI of Community law in paragraphs 36 to 59 of the judgment under appeal. In particular, the appellant takes the view that the CFI incorrectly interpreted the term ‘circumstances arising from work done for another State’ used in the second indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations.

---
# C_2006114EN.01000302.xml

| 16.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4063 — Cisco/Scientific Atlanta)

(2006/C 114/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4063. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4063. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---