alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,548,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,020,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,600,830
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,624,101
<PP&E>                                       8,018,472
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,495,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,794,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,409,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        546
<COMMON>                                        25,851
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,145,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,794,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            99,307,277
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,438,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            35,013,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,147,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             625,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,843,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,843,962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2006074EN.01003301.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/33

---

Action brought on 1 January 2006 — Fernandez Ortis v Commission

(Case F-1/06)

(2006/C 74/64)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Juan Miguel Fernandez Ortis (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. R. Iturriagagoitia Bassas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the dismissal of the applicant by decision of 17 June 2005 is unlawful, constituting an abuse of legal process, and accordingly annul that decision and the decision associated with it of 23 September 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the dismissal of the applicant by decision of 17 June 2005 is unlawful, constituting an abuse of legal process, and accordingly annul that decision and the decision associated with it of 23 September 2005;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former official of the Commission, took up his duties on 1 February 2004, the date on which his nine-month probationary period began, in accordance with Article 34(1) of the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities.

A report of 4 October 2004 recommended his dismissal, but the Commission decided exceptionally to extend his probationary period until 30 April 2005 in accordance with Article 34(3) of the Staff Regulations. By decision of 17 June 2005 the Commission dismissed the applicant with effect from 1 July 2005.

In support of his application, the applicant claims that his dismissal is unlawful on the ground that he was dismissed 17 months after the commencement of his probationary period, which, under Article 34(4) of the Staff Regulations, may not exceed 15 months.

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3163

To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid to a resident of

Washington for services as a Federal employee at a Federal hydroelectric

facility located on the Columbia River.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 26, 1996

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mrs. SMITH of Washington)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid

to a resident of Washington for services as a Federal

employee at a Federal hydroelectric facility located on

the Columbia River.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO TAX

4 COMPENSATION PAID TO CERTAIN FEDERAL

5 EMPLOYEES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111 of title 4, United

7 States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 3163 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—’’ be2 fore ‘‘The United States’’ the first place it appears,

3 and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section:

6 ‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN FEDERAL EMPLOY7 EES EMPLOYED AT FEDERAL HYDROELECTRIC FACILI8 TIES LOCATED ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER.—Pay or com9 pensation paid by the United States for personal services

10 as an employee of the United States at a hydroelectric

11 facility—

12 ‘‘(1) which is owned by the United States,

13 ‘‘(2) which is located on the Columbia River,

14 and

15 ‘‘(3) portions of which are within the States of

16 Oregon and Washington,

17 shall be subject to taxation by the State of Oregon or any

18 political subdivision thereof only if such employee is a resi19 dent of such State or political subdivision.’’

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 subsection (a) shall apply to pay and compensation paid

22 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2006055EN.01006002.xml

| 7.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/60

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3670 — EQT Group/Carl Zeiss/Sola)

(2006/C 55/28)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3670. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3670. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006074EN.01000401.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano by order of that court of 6 October 2005 in Ministero Pubblico v Giovanni Dell'Orto

(Case C-467/05)

(2006/C 74/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Milano of 6 October 2005, received at the Court Registry on 27 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Ministero Pubblico and Giovanni Dell'Orto on the following questions:

| 1. | Do Articles 2 and 9 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA apply in criminal proceedings in general to any party affected by crime, by virtue of Article 1 et seq of Council Directive 2004/80/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims or other provisions of Community law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Articles 2 and 9 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA apply in criminal proceedings in general to any party affected by crime, by virtue of Article 1 et seq of Council Directive 2004/80/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims or other provisions of Community law.

any party affected by crime

1

| 2. | Do Articles 2 and 9 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA apply in criminal proceedings for enforcement following a conviction which has become final (and thus also to a sentence pursuant to Article 444 CPP) to any party affected by crime, by virtue of Article 1 et seq of Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims or other provisions of Community law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do Articles 2 and 9 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA apply in criminal proceedings for enforcement following a conviction which has become final (and thus also to a sentence pursuant to Article 444 CPP) to any party affected by crime, by virtue of Article 1 et seq of Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims or other provisions of Community law.

any party affected by crime

---

(1)  OJ L 261 of 6/8/2004, p. 15.

1

---
#### § 124.6 Grant payments.

Grant payments shall be made to the applicant in accordance with the requirements of 45 CFR 75.305.

[42 FR 62270, Dec. 9, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
# C_2006106EN.01000602.xml

| 5.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4171 — Bosch/Mann + Hummel/Arvinmeritor Purolator)

(2006/C 106/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4171. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4171. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Ex parte Elvin P. RICE. In re HUMANA OF ALABAMA, INC., d/b/a North Alabama Hospital v. Elvin P. RICE.

79-213.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 25, 1980.

Robert I. Rogers, Jr. of Bedford, Bedford & Rogers, Russellville, for petitioner.

Robert E. Cooper, of Fine, McDowell & Cooper, Russellville, for respondent.

SHORES, Justice.

By denying the petition, we should not be understood to reach the question of whether any claim for relief might have been alleged or proved under the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. That issue is not before us.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three month period ending March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                   <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                                248,275
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         66,503
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        314,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            295,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          314,778
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,799
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,799
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                         3.05
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



DIVALL INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DiVall Income Properties 3 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                        |  |                                                              
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                      |  |                                       
|Dated: March 22, 2004 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                                           
|                      |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer



This certification
is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge

standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
# C_2005229EN.01000102.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-41/03 P: Rica Foods (Free Zone) NV v Commission of the European Communities, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic (1)

1

(Appeal - Arrangements for association of the overseas countries and territories - Imports of sugar and mixtures of sugar and cocoa - Regulation (EC) No 465/2000 - Safeguard measures - Article 109 of the OCT Decision - Commission's power of assessment - Principle of proportionality - Reasons)

(2005/C 229/02)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-41/03 P: Rica Foods (Free Zone) NV, established in Oranjestad (Aruba) (Lawyer: G. van der Wal), the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: T. van Rijn), Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agent H. Sevenster), Kingdom of Spain (Agents: N. Díaz Abad and D. Miguel Muñoz Pérez), French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and L. Bernheim) — appeal under Article 49 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 29 January 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Rica Foods (Free Zone) NV to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rica Foods (Free Zone) NV to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 05.04.2003.

1

---
#### Claude Franklin MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Transport Transports

Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Can ada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address.

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC)

at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059

, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp

24-0022 (01-2005) 1/1 No

. CF-2010-09

Issue Date 17 March 2010

Number: CF-2010-09

Subject: Engine Impeller in-service Life Reduction

Effective: 6 April 2010

Applicability: All Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PW 305A and PW305B engines with impeller 

### part number (P/N) 30B2185 or 30B2486 or 30B2858-01 or 30B4565-01 installation

Compliance: Is required as indicated, unless already accomplished

Background: As a result of a change in the low-cycl e fatigue lifing methodology for the IMI 834 material, the recommended service life of certain PW305A and PW305B Impellers has been reduced, as published in the Airworthine ss Limitations (AWL) section of Engine Maintenance Manual (EMM).

The in-service life of impellers P/N 30B2185, 30B2486 and 30B2858-01 has been reduced from 12,000 to 7,000 cycles; and of P/N 30B4565-01 from 8,500 to 7,000 cycles.

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued to mandate the incorporation of the revised inservice life limits for the affected impellers, in the AWL section of EMM, as introduced by Temporary Revision (TR) AL-8.

Corrective

Actions: Within 30 days from the effective date of this AD, update AWL section of your PW305 EMM P/N 30B1402, to incorporate TR AL-8 fo r compliance with the revised in-service limits for the affected Impellers, installed on PW305A and PW305B engine.

Authorization: For Minister of Transport, In frastructure and Communities



### ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Mr. A K Durrani, Continuing Airworthine ss, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile

613-996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.335 Basis of payment. ( a ) *Method of payment.* Under the prospective payment system, SNFs receive a per diem payment of a predetermined rate for inpatient services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The per diem payments are made on the basis of the Federal payment rate described in § 413.337 and, during a transition period, on the basis of a blend of the Federal rate and the facility-specific rate described in § 413.340. These per diem payment rates are determined according to the methodology described in §§ 413.337 and 413.340.
( b ) *Payment in full.* ( 1 ) The payment rates represent payment in full (subject to applicable coinsurance as described in subpart G of part 409 of this chapter) for all costs (routine, ancillary, and capital-related) associated with furnishing inpatient SNF services to Medicare beneficiaries other than costs associated with approved educational activities as described in § 413.85.
( 2 ) In addition to the Federal per diem payment amounts, SNFs receive payment for bad debts of Medicare beneficiaries, as specified in § 413.89 of this part.
[63 FR 26309, May 12, 1998, as amended at 73 FR 46440, Aug. 8, 2008]
#### § 136.108 [Reserved]