alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006060EN.01000401.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

12 January 2006

in Case C-132/04 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 89/391/EEC - Scope - Non-civilian personnel in public authorities - Armed forces and police - Included)

(2006/C 60/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-132/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: L. Escobar Guerrero and H. Kreppel) v Kingdom of Spain (Agent: M. Muñoz Pérez) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), R. Silva Lapuerta and P. Kūris, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Declared that, by failing to transpose in their entirety into its national legislation Article 2(1) and (2) and Article 4 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvement in the safety and health of workers at work as regards non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declared that, by failing to transpose in their entirety into its national legislation Article 2(1) and (2) and Article 4 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvement in the safety and health of workers at work as regards non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Ordered the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ordered the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004

1

---
#### Buford SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS and Houston General Insurance Company.

No. 65093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Buford Smith, applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Avoyelles. 370 So.2d 1295.

Writ denied.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I,
Andrew I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results



Date: June 13, 2008

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>

[CHIRON LETTERHEAD]



February 14, 2001

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Dr. William J. Rutter
111 Telegraph Hill Blvd.
San Francisco, California 94133

Re:  AMENDMENT OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 25, 2000
     ---------------------------------------------------------


Dear Bill,

I am pleased to confirm our discussions to extend your agreement to work with
Chiron Corporation through February 24, 2002.

Your fee will be $8,333.33 per month, payable to you monthly in advance, for the
period commencing on February 25, 2001 and terminating on February 24, 2002.

In addition, the field of the agreement is hereby amended to cover advice and
consultation from time to time to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with
respect to corporate and strategic matters.

Please acknowledge your acceptance and agreement to the foregoing by signing and
returning to me a copy of the enclosed letter.


Yours sincerely,


/s/ Sean
Sean P. Lance
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


AGREED THIS 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001.

/s/ William J. Rutter
---------------------------------------
William J. Rutter, Ph.D.
AAM-11-024-E 

Nov 08 2010 

 Exemption No. 10158 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1083 

Mr. Jared L. Watkins 

Heli Xpress, LLC 

100 Wyman Court 

Winston-Salem, NC 27106 

Dear Mr.Watkins: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 22, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Heli Xpress, LLC (Heli Xpress) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Heli Xpress, 

which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Heli Xpress. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Heli Xpress, LLC, an exemption from part 120 to the 

extent necessary to allow Heli Xpress, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Heli Xpress are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Heli Xpress part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Docket No: F AA-2012-11-31 

Directorate ID: 2012-NE-34-AD 

Disposition Comments 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3368EN-E 

Next Step: FRAN 0 SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

[8'J No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received - If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference F AA-lR-M-8040.1 C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: other 

If other, explain: No comments were received, but changes were made to this AD 

basea on EASA 's 2'"

1 revision of the MCAI. Additional clarifications were also 

incorporated to the instructions. 

Commenter( s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

lfYES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don 't agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter( s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

Page 1 of3 
If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don 't agree because 

ISSUE : Select one ofthefollowing: 

If other. explain: 

Commenter( s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here 

because We disagree with 

Page 2 of3 

because 

because 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3368EN-E 

) 

/ 

&j~]i101~ Date 

oJ) /:21/7 13 Date 

Page 3 of3
§ 408.21 Reduction in Medicare Part B premium as an additional benefit under Medicare + Choice plans. ( a ) *Basis for reduction in Part B premium.* Beginning January 1, 2003 an M + C organization may elect to receive a reduction in its payments under § 422.250(a)(1) of this chapter if— ( 1 ) 80 percent of the payment reduction is applied to reduce the standard Medicare Part B premiums of its Medicare enrollees.
( 2 ) The Medicare Part B premium is reduced monthly and is offered to all Medicare enrollees in a specific plan benefit package.
( b ) *Administrative requirements for the Part B premium reduction.* ( 1 ) The Medicare Part B premium reduction cannot be greater than the standard premium amount determined for the year, under section 1839(a)(3) of the Act. However, it may be less.
( 2 ) The Medicare Part B premium reduction must be a multiple of 10 cents.
( 3 ) The Medicare Part B premium reduction is applied regardless of who pays or collects the Part B premium on behalf of the beneficiary.
( 4 ) The Medicare Part B premium can never be less than zero and will never result in a payment to a beneficiary for a specific month.
( c ) *Beneficiary eligibility.* In order for a beneficiary to be eligible for the Medicare Part B premium reduction, the beneficiary must be enrolled in an M + C plan that offers the Medicare Part B premium reduction as an additional benefit.
( d ) *Notifications.* After determining the Medicare Part B premium reduction amount for each eligible beneficiary, CMS will— ( 1 ) Transmit this information to the Social Security Administration, Railroad Retirement Board, or the Office of Personnel Management, as appropriate, which will adjust the benefit check amounts as appropriate and notify the beneficiaries of their new benefit amount.
( 2 ) Notify states and formal groups and direct billed beneficiaries of their reduced premium amounts in the regular monthly billing process.
[68 FR 66723, Nov. 28, 2003]
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.370 Scope.

This subpart implements section 1834(r) of the Act by setting forth the principles and authorities under which CMS is authorized to establish a payment amount for renal dialysis services furnished to beneficiaries with an acute kidney injury in or under the supervision of an ESRD facility that meets the conditions of coverage in part 494 of this chapter and as defined in § 413.171.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,911,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      41,900,835
<DEPRECIATION>                            (22,502,903)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,601,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     23,466,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,601,245
<SALES>                                      8,662,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,159,934
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,154,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,172,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (167,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (167,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Palestinian Territories

503 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 7, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 7, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 5, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 5, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 4, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 4, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 29, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 29, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 23, 2021	  Jalina PorterApril 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 21, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 21, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 9, 2021	  Jalina PorterApril 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 8, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 7, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 7, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Restores Assistance for the Palestinians	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 7, 2021 

previous page1…464748495051next page

Back to Top
# FILED

September 30, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF A

PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

ROZANNE F. WRIGHT ) (FOLK-SCHMIDT), ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Davidson Circu it No. 85D-3523 )

VS. ) Appeal No . 01A01-9708-CV- 00413 ) JAN H. SCHMIDT, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a petition to rehear, which, after due consideration, is

respectfully denied.

HIGHERS, J.

CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.

FARMER, J.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Election of Fiame Naomi Mata’afa as Prime Minister of Samoa

# 									Election of Fiame Naomi Mata’afa as Prime Minister of Samoa							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

July 26, 2021

The United States congratulates Fiame Naomi Mata’afa on her historic victory to become Samoa’s first female prime minister.  We look forward to working with Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mata’afa and Samoa’s new government.  The United States thanks former Prime Minister Tuila’epa Sa’ilele Malielegaoi for his longstanding friendship.

 

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonSamoa

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Croatia Statehood Day

# 									Croatia Statehood Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 30, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our best wishes to the people of Croatia as you celebrate your statehood day.

As Croatia celebrates its 15th anniversary as a NATO Ally, we thank you for your important contributions to Ukraine, our collective security, and strengthening of the transatlantic relationship.  We are proud to see Croatia’s role as a regional leader enhanced through security cooperation and economic integration, advancing our common goal of greater Euro-Atlantic integration throughout the Western Balkans.  Our shared values are bolstered by our long-standing and deep friendship.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCroatiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Home2017 Treaties and Agreements...Ecuador (17-912.1) – Extension to Annex I of Agreement of September 26, 1986, as modified

# 									Ecuador (17-912.1) – Extension to Annex I of Agreement of September 26, 1986, as modified							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 12, 2017

Transportation:  Aviation Transport Services

Effected by exchange of notes at Quito August 29 and September 12, 2017; entered into force September 12, 2017.  With effect from June 30, 2017.

Protocol modifying annexes of agreement done September 26, 1986: TIAS 11-124.  Annexes previously extended June 27, 2016: TIAS 16-627
Download attachment						 [1 MB]

Tags

EcuadorTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

#### § 405.1805 Parties to contractor determination.

The parties to the contractor's determination are the provider and any other entity found by the contractor to be a related organization of the provider under § 413.17 of this chapter.

[48 FR 39835, Sept. 1, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 34793, Sept. 30, 1986]
§ 419.62 Transitional pass-through payments: General rules. ( a ) *General.* CMS provides for additional payments under §§ 419.64 and 419.66 for certain innovative medical devices, drugs, and biologicals.
( b ) *Budget neutrality.* CMS establishes the additional payments under §§ 419.64 and 419.66 in a budget neutral manner.
( c ) *Uniform prospective reduction of pass-through payments.* ( 1 ) If CMS estimates before the beginning of a calendar year that the total amount of pass-through payments under §§ 419.64 and 419.66 for the year would exceed the applicable percentage (as described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) of the total amount of Medicare payments under the outpatient prospective payment system. CMS will reduce, pro rata, the amount of each of the additional payments under §§ 419.64 and 419.66 for that year to ensure that the applicable percentage is not exceeded.
( 2 ) The applicable percentages are as follows: ( i ) For a year before CY 2004, the applicable percentage is 2.5 percent.
( ii ) For 2004 and subsequent years, the applicable percentage is a percentage specified by CMS up to (but not to exceed) 2.0 percent.
( d ) *CY 2002 incorporated amount.* For the portion of CY 2002 affected by these rules, CMS incorporated 75 percent of the estimated pass-through costs (before the incorporation and any pro rata reduction) for devices into the procedure APCs associated with these devices.
[66 FR 55856, 55865, Nov. 2, 2001; 67 FR 9568, Mar. 1, 2002] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 66 FR 55865, Nov. 2, 2001, § 419.62 was amended by adding paragraph (d), effective Jan. 1, 2002. At 66 FR 67494, Dec. 31, 2001, the amendment was delayed indefinitely.
# C_2005281EN.01000102.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Lists for the determination of the composition of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Chambers as from 11 October 2005

(2005/C 281/02)

At its meeting on 11 October 2005, the Court drew up the lists referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the determination of the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Fourth Chamber

Ms Colneric

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Mr Lenaerts

Mr Juhász

Mr Ilešič

Mr Levits

Fifth Chamber

Mr Gulmann

Mr Schintgen

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Kūris

Mr Arestis

Mr Klučka

Sixth Chamber

Mr La Pergola

Mr Puissochet

Mr von Bahr

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Lõhmus

Mr Ó Caoimh

---