alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeDipNote...Don’t Wait — Check Your Passport’s Expiration Date

# 									Don’t Wait — Check Your Passport’s Expiration Date							

DipNote: Travel

Alyssa Zalenski

Bureau of Consular Affairs

September 1, 2022

Every September, the State Department celebrates Passport Month to promote the benefits of traveling abroad and the importance of maintaining a valid passport.  September is a good time to check if you need to renew your passport.  Are you planning a vacation abroad?  Do you have friends or family living overseas you may want to visit?  Is it possible you may need to travel internationally for business this year?  If your passport will expire within the next year, it’s time to renew it.  If you don’t have a passport, it’s a great time to apply for one.

**Apply Early**

Here’s what you need to know about applying for or renewing your passport:
        - Processing can take 8-11 weeks for routine service.  Please allow plenty of time ahead of your trip to get your passport.  
        - Renewing by mail  is the easiest, quickest way to renew your passport.  Simply mail us your DS-82 form, 2×2 photo, fees, and your current, undamaged, adult passport.  
        - If you are not eligible to renew by mail, you must apply in person at an  acceptance facility  (post office, library, etc.). There are more than 7,500 acceptance facilities nationwide.  
        - You must apply in person if your previous passport expired more than 5 years ago, was issued before you were 16 years old, or was lost, stolen or damaged. 

**Receiving Your New Passport**

The day has come – your shiny new passport has arrived in your mailbox.  Take note of the following:
        - You may have received the  Next Generation Passport , or you might have received the earlier version of the passport, called the e-Passport.  Both passport types are valid for travel and are premier documents recognized around the world. 
        - On the back of your new passport is a QR code sticker.  Scan the code with your phone’s camera to be directly linked to our website where you’ll find more information about your passport as well as travel tips.  
        - The documents you submitted with your application (birth certificate, old passport, etc.) will be returned to you in a separate envelope.  It may take 6-8 weeks after you receive your new passport for your supporting documents to make it to your mailbox. Thank you for your patience!  

 

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FB-IG_GIF_Student-or-General-Use-.mp4

**Online Passport Renewal**

Customers will have the option to renew their undamaged adult passports online starting this winter.  Customers who choose to renew online will  have the option for routine or expedited service. 

**Bon Voyage!**

Traveling internationally can be stressful, but applying for your passport doesn’t have to be.  Apply early and check that item off your list.  Safe travels! 

*About the Author: Alyssa Zalenski is a Public Affairs Officer for the Digital Engagement Team in the Bureau of Consular Affairs at the U.S. Department of State.*

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsConsular IssuesPassportsTravel

Back to Top
June 27, 2014

Mr. Fred Bell

Museum Director,

Palm Springs Air Museum

745 N. Gene Autry Trail

Palm Springs, CA 92262

Dear Mr. Bell:

This is in response to your February 14, 2014, letter (FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0152) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from 

§§ 91.315, 91.319, 119.5(g), and 119.21 of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The 

petition, if granted, would enable Palm Springs Air Museum to provide passenger flight 

experiences for compensation or hire in the following aircraft:

1. North American T-28 (N372C, Serial Number 138203) – Experimental Category

2. North American P-51 Mustang (N151BP, Serial Number 44-74908) – Limited 

Category

The FAA’s Living History Flight Experience Policy (LHFE) is to use the exemption process as 

an appropriate way to enable preservation of aviation history and keep historic airplanes 

operational when comparable airplanes that hold a standard airworthiness certificate do not exist. 

While the policy statement would include aircraft operations proposed in your petition for 

exemption, the FAA has issued a moratorium on issuance of new exemptions for passenger 

carrying operations conducted for compensation and hire in other than standard category aircraft. 

The moratorium was published in the Federal Register on March 23, 2011 (76 FR 16239) and 

remains in effect. A copy of the policy statement is enclosed.

Because the FAA is not considering new petitions for operation under the LHFE Policy at this 

time, we will take no further action on your petition for exemption from §§ 91.315, 91.319, 

119.5(g) and 119.21 of 14 CFR. 

Sincerely,

//s//

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 422 appear at 63 FR 35098, 35099, June 26, 1998.

§ 422.374 Waiver request and approval process. ( a ) *Substantially complete waiver request.* The organization must submit a substantially complete waiver request that clearly demonstrates and documents its eligibility for a waiver under § 422.372.
( b ) CMS gives the organization written notice of granting or denial of waiver within 60 days of receipt of a substantially complete waiver request.
( c ) *Subsequent waiver requests.* An organization that has had a waiver request denied, may submit subsequent waiver requests until November 1, 2002.
( d ) *Effective date.* A waiver granted under § 422.370 will be effective on the effective date of the organization's MA contract.
( e ) *Consistency in application.* CMS reserves the right to revoke waiver eligibility if it subsequently determines that the organization's MA application is significantly different from the application submitted by the organization to the State licensing authority.
[63 FR 25377, May 7, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 35098, June 26, 1998]
41014.

#### REGISTER et al. v. HERRIN.

Hall, Judge.

This case was transferred to this court from the Supreme Court. *Register v. Herrin,*220 Ga. 223 (138 SE2d 169). It involves a boundary line dispute between adjoining landowners and was submitted to arbitrators under a stipulation entered into between the parties and made the order of the court, wherein three named surveyors were appointed to establish the boundary line. The stipulation provided that questions of payment for the survey, mesne profits, etc., should be submitted to a jury. The appointed surveyors filed in court their written report and survey plat. The plaintiff filed a motion repudiating and excepting to the findings of the surveyors, and moving that the issues be presented to the jury. The trial court overruled this motion. Upon the verdict of the jury the court entered a judgment establishing the boundary line designated on the plat as the boundary between the parties’ property. The plaintiff made a motion for new trial which the court overruled. In this court the plaintiff assigns error on the judgments overruling his motion repudiating and excepting to the surveyors’ findings and overruling his motion for new trial. *Held:*

The general rule is that, when a case has been submitted to a common law arbitration, until the award has been made final by its publication by the arbitrators, the submission is still pending, and may be revoked at any time by either of the parties. *Harrell v. Terrell,*125 Ga. 379, 381 (54 SE 116); *Davis v. Maxwell,*27 Ga. 368; *Cherry v. Smith,*51 Ga. 558. *737However, where a submission to arbitration in a pending action is made under a rule or order of court, whether pursuant to statute or otherwise, it cannot be revoked by a party without leave of court. *Leonard v. House,*15 Ga. 473; *Harrell v. Terrell,*125 Ga. 379, 381, supra; 5 Am. Jur. 2d 552, § 43; 6 CJS 175, § 33 (d). Under such circumstances the granting of leave to revoke rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Heritage v. State, 43 Ind. App. 595 (88 NE 114); 6 CJS 175, § 33 (d). In *Cherry v. Smith,*51 Ga. 558, supra, relied on by the plaintiff, the court order sanctioning the arbitration did not name and appoint the arbitrators and therefore did not prevent revocation by one of the parties. In the present case an action had been filed and the issue of the boundary line was submitted to arbitrators by agreement of the parties made the order of the court, in which the arbitrators were specifically named and appointed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to repudiate the findings of the arbitrators. The cases cited by the plaintiff do not support his position that the trial court was required to grant his motion to repudiate and to submit all the issues to the jury.

Decided November 30, 1964.

*Albert E. Butler,*for plaintiff in error.

*Zorn & Royal, William A. Zorn,*contra.

The trial court did not err in the judgments overruling the plaintiff’s motions to repudiate and for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
[675 NYS2d 25]

#### 1286 First Realty Associates, L.P., Appellant, v Joseph Malatinsky et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 29, 1998

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Mitofsky & Shapiro,*New York City *William J. Neville*of counsel), for appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order and final judgment entered April 8, 1997 reversed, *597with $30 costs, and final judgment of possession granted in favor of landlord on the holdover petition.

In this holdover proceeding based upon nonprimary residence, the parties submitted the matter for determination upon an agreed statement of facts. Those facts demonstrate that the controlled tenant has not resided in the subject apartment at East 69th Street since June 1995, having resided in a health care facility for approximately one year, and then at an address in Elmhurst, Queens. The stipulation further indicates that the tenant has not filed resident tax returns or voted from the Manhattan address since 1995. No telephone or cable television service is provided to the apartment, and utility service is at a bare minimum.

On this record, Civil Court erred in dismissing the petition upon the ground that “there is no evidence presented to state that respondent shall be unable to return to the premises”. The parties charted their own procedural course in submitting the case, and tenant failed to make any representation as to his intention or ability to resume occupancy of the controlled premises. Where there has been a prolonged absence from the apartment, a vaguely articulated intent to return at some unspecified time in the future is insufficient to defend a nonprimary residence claim *(London Terrace Gardens v Sacks,*NYLJ, Feb. 2,1993, at 21, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]; *Rockledge Equities v Michaelson,*NYLJ, Aug. 10, 1993, at 21, col 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]). The stipulation conclusively demonstrates the absence of an “ ‘ongoing, substantial, physical nexus with the controlled premises for actual living purposes’ ” *(Sommer v Ann Turkel, Inc.,*137 Misc 2d 7, 10) which is necessary for continued protection of the tenancy.

It is noted that tenant has failed to appear in this appeal.

Issuance of the warrant shall be stayed for 30 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

Parness, P. J., Freedman and Davis, JJ., concur.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3110

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for disclosure by

the Social Security Administration of Social Security account numbers

and other records pursuant to judgments, decrees, or orders issued by

courts of competent jurisdiction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 19, 1996

Mr. GREENWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide

for disclosure by the Social Security Administration of

Social Security account numbers and other records pursuant to judgments, decrees, or orders issued by courts

of competent jurisdiction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS

4 PURSUANT TO COURT JUDGMENTS, DE5 CREES, OR ORDERS.

6 Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) is amended—
2

•HR 3110 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) and

2 (G) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively; and

3 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph:

5 ‘‘(E) Any judgment, decree, or order issued by a

6 court of competent jurisdiction to the Social Security Ad7 ministration shall be treated as an order meeting the re8 quirements for disclosure under section 552a(b)(11) of

9 title 5, United States Code, to the extent the judgment,

10 decree, or order requires disclosure of an individual’s So11 cial Security account number or any other record main12 tained by the Social Security Administration pertaining to

13 an individual. Any such order shall not be treated as pre14 cluded by any determination that the need for the disclo15 sure is inadequate on the basis of any invasion of privacy

16 which might result from such order.’’.

17 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

18 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

19 respect to judgments, decrees, and orders issued by courts

20 of competent jurisdiction on or after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act.

Æ
HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Census Bureau

# 									Census Bureau							

Circular Notes and Notices

**03/13/19:**Diplomatic Note 19-401: Census Bureau Announcement

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.






Dated: June 14, 2010





/s/  Thomas V. Geimer

Thomas V. Geimer,

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3129 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3129

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow loans under the Thrift 
Savings Plan to be made for expenses associated with the adoption of a 
                                 child.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 1996

  Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow loans under the Thrift 
Savings Plan to be made for expenses associated with the adoption of a 
                                 child.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADOPTION OF A CHILD.

    Paragraph (2) of section 8433(g) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (C), by striking 
the period at the end of subparagraph (D) and inserting ``; or'', and 
by adding at the end the following:
            ``(E) expenses associated with the adoption of a child.''.
                                 <all>
```
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02899

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytogen Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), H. Joseph Reiser,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.





August 14, 2002                     /s/ H. Joseph Reiser
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    H. Joseph Reiser
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006068EN.01002002.xml

| 21.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/20

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4042 — Toepfer/Invivo/Soulès)

(2006/C 68/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4042. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4042. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006137EN.01000201.xml

| 10.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4203 — Bayerngas/Deutsche Essent/Novogate JV)

(2006/C 137/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 23 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4203. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4203. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.65 [Reserved]
#### Kathryn Loraine GOSMAN, Petitioner, v. Sheriff William HEIDTMAN, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 74-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 11, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterlyperiod ended November 26, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Konidaris, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Nicholas Konidaris                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Nicholas Konidaris                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: December 21, 2005              |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section1350, and not for any other purpose.  Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by ElectroScientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----