alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 405.1112 Content of request for review. ( a ) The request for Council review must be filed with the entity specified in the notice of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action. The request for review must be in writing and may be made on a standard form. A written request that is not made on a standard form is accepted if it contains the beneficiary's name; Medicare number; the specific service(s) or item(s) for which the review is requested; the specific date(s) of service; the date of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision or dismissal order, if any; and the name of the party or the representative of the party; and any other information CMS may decide.
( b ) The request for review must identify the parts of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action with which the party requesting review disagrees and explain why he or she disagrees with the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision, dismissal, or other determination being appealed. For example, if the party requesting review believes that the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action is inconsistent with a statute, regulation, CMS Ruling, or other authority, the request for review should explain why the appellant believes the action is inconsistent with that authority.
( c ) The Council will limit its review of an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's actions to those exceptions raised by the party in the request for review, unless the appellant is an unrepresented beneficiary. For purposes of this section only, we define a representative as anyone who has accepted an appointment as the beneficiary's representative, except a member of the beneficiary's family, a legal guardian, or an individual who routinely acts on behalf of the beneficiary, such as a family member or friend who has a power of attorney.
[82 FR 5123, Jan. 17, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 19871, May 7, 2019]
§ 92.13 Assessment of civil penalties. ( a ) *General rule.* The assessing official may impose a civil penalty on any person when the following two conditions are met: ( 1 ) That person uses in connection with, or as a part of, any advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product, whether alone or with other words, letters, symbols, or emblems— ( i ) The words “Department of the Treasury,” “United States Mint,” or “U.S. Mint”;
( ii ) The titles “Secretary of the Treasury,” “Treasurer of the United States,” “Director of the United States Mint,” or “Director of the U.S. Mint”;
( iii ) The abbreviations or initials of any entity or title referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (a)(1)(ii) of this section;
( iv ) Any symbol, emblem, seal, or badge of an entity referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section (including the design of any envelope, stationery, or identification card used by such an entity); or
( v ) Any colorable imitation of any such words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, seals, or badges; and
( 2 ) That person's use is in a manner that could reasonably be interpreted or construed as conveying the false impression that such advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product is in any manner approved, endorsed, sponsored, authorized by, or associated with the United States Mint, or any officer, or employee thereof.
( b ) *Disclaimers.* Any determination of whether a person has violated the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall be made without regard to any use of a disclaimer of affiliation with the United States Government or any particular agency or instrumentality thereof.
( c ) *Civil penalty.* The assessing official may impose a civil penalty on any person who violates the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section. The amount of a civil penalty shall not exceed $5,000 for each and every use of any material in violation of paragraph (a) of this section, except that such penalty shall not exceed $25,000 for each and every use if such use is in a broadcast or telecast.
( d ) *Time limitations.* ( 1 ) Civil penalties imposed under the procedures in this subpart must be assessed before the end of the three-year period beginning on the date of offense.
( 2 ) The assessing official may commence a civil action to recover or enforce any civil penalty imposed in a Final Notice of Assessment issued pursuant to § 92.17 at any time before the end of the two-year period beginning on the date of the Final Notice of Assessment. If judicial review of the Final Notice of Assessment is sought, the two-year period begins to run from the date that a final and unappealable court order is issued.
( e ) *Criminal Proceeding.* No civil penalty may be imposed under the procedures in this subpart with respect to any violation of paragraph (a) of this section after a criminal proceeding on the same violation has been commenced by indictment or information under 31 U.S.C. 333(d).
EXHIBIT (10)D(iv)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO


ECOLAB INC. 1995
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR


STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the
“Company”) adopted the 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, effective
as of May 12, 1995 (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, the Plan was
previously amended by Amendment No. 1 to extend the term by one year and
by Amendment No. 2 to effect certain additional changes to expand the
means of cashless exercises; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
wishes to amend the terms of certain options currently outstanding under the
Plan to permit cashless exercises of such options on the terms and conditions
provided below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant
to the amending power reserved to the Company’s Board of Directors by Section 7
of the Plan, the Board of Directors adopted this Amendment No. 3 to the
Plan on October 31, 2008.


 


Section 1


 


Section 5(b)(vi) of the Plan is amended and
restated to read as follows:


 


“(vi)  Payment of Exercise Price.  The total purchase price of the shares to be
purchased upon the exercise of an Option may be paid entirely in cash
(including check, bank draft or money order), by tendering a broker exercise
notice, by tendering, or by attestation as to ownership of, shares of the
Company’s Common Stock already owned by the Optionee that have been held for
the period of time necessary to avoid a charge to the Company’s earnings for
financial reporting purposes, including shares which would otherwise be issued
upon such exercise (“Previously Acquired Shares”), or by a combination
thereof.  For purposes of such payment,
Previously Acquired Shares will be valued at their Fair Market Value on the
exercise date.”


 


Section 2


 


The foregoing amendment and
restatement of Section 5(b)(vi) shall only be effective with respect
to the Options outstanding as of October 31, 2008 that are held by
Optionees satisfying the definition of Eligible Director under Section 3
of the Plan as of such date.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ecolab Inc. has executed this
Amendment No. 3 this 31st day of October,
2008.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  ECOLAB INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Michael L.
  Meyer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: 

  	
  Michael L. Meyer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  Senior Vice
  President – Human Resources

  
						



 


 


Attest:


 


	
  /s/ Sarah Z.
  Erickson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Sarah Z.
  Erickson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Associate
  General Counsel-Corporate and Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  
					



 


2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 20 (Monday, February 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5868-5869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,675]


Procter and Gamble Hair Care, LLC; a Subsidiary of Procter and 
Gamble, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Staff Management, Seaton 
Corp., and Horizon Staffing, Stamford, CT; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on December 29, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Procter and Gamble Hair Care, LLC, a subsidiary of Procter and Gamble, 
Stamford, Connecticut. The notice will be published soon in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of hair colorants.
    The review finds that the Department inadvertently omitted from the 
certification the workers leased from Staff Management, Seaton Corp., 
and Horizon Staffing that were working on-site at the subject firm.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include workers leased from Staff Management, Seaton Corp., and Horizon 
Staffing working on-site at the Stamford, Connecticut location of the 
subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,675 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Procter and Gamble Hair Care, LLC, a subsidiary 
of Procter and Gamble, including on-site leased workers from Staff 
Management, Seaton Corp., and Horizon Staffing, Stamford, 
Connecticut, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 12, 2007 through December 29, 2010, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade

[[Page 5869]]

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of January 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-2141 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2005222EN.01000401.xml

| 9.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3855 — Webasto/Starck/Staxera)

(2005/C 222/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3855. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3855. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0487

____________________________

DUANE BENDER and REBECCA ESTATES, LLC,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

STACEY ROSMAN and JOHN DOES 1-10,

Defendants and Appellees.

______________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING APPELLEE AND APPELLANT’S STIPULATION 

AND MOTION TO HOLD TIME REQUIREMENTS IN ABEYANCE 

__________________________________________________________________

APPEARANCES:

Dennison A. Butler

P.O. Box 152

23 N. Broadway, Suite 205

Red Lodge, MT 59068

Phone: (406) 366-4826

dennisonabutler@gmail.com

Attorney for Appellants Duane Bender 

and Rebecca Estates, LLC 

David F. Knobel

P.O. Box 2529

Billings, MT 59103

Phone: (406) 255-7343 

dknobel@crowleyfleck.com

Attorney for Appellee Stacey Rosman 

01/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0487
Before the Court is Appellee Stacey Rosman and Appellants Duane Bender 

and Rebeca Estate, LLC’s Mont. R. App. P. 7 stipulation and motion to hold time 

requirements in abeyance. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties may conduct appellate mediation on 

February 9, 2023, with Greg Murphy serving as mediator, and Mr. Rosman’s 

response brief shall be due within 30 days of the filing of the mediator’s report. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2023
#### § 137.23 For purposes of determining eligibility for participation in self-governance, may the Secretary consider any other information regarding the Indian Tribe's financial stability and financial management capacity?

No, meeting the criteria set forth in §§ 137.21 and 137.22, shall be conclusive evidence of the required stability and capability to participate in self-governance.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4053 — Morgan Stanley/AM Development)

(2006/C 15/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
HomeItaly

# Italy

267 items

        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Burma	  February 23, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Italian Foreign Minister Di Maio	  February 22, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Burma	  February 3, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Italian Foreign Minister Di Maio	  January 28, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Arrest and Detention of Alexey Navalny	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Situation in Libya	  January 21, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Italy (21-112) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions	  January 12, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Italy (20-922) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 22, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Italy	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Italy	  July 29, 2020 

previous page1…1920212223…27next page

Back to Top
§ 137.274 Does this subpart cover construction programs? No, except as provided in § 137.275, this subpart does not cover construction programs such as the: ( a ) Maintenance and Improvement Program;
( b ) Construction program functions; and,
( c ) Planning services and construction management services.
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.220 Methodology for calculating the per-treatment base rate under the ESRD prospective payment system effective January 1, 2011. ( a ) *Data sources.* The methodology for determining the per treatment base rate under the ESRD prospective payment system utilized: ( 1 ) Medicare data available to estimate the average cost and payments for renal dialysis services.
( 2 ) ESRD facility cost report data capturing the average cost per treatment.
( 3 ) The lowest per patient utilization calendar year as identified from Medicare claims is calendar year 2007.
( 4 ) Wage index values used to adjust for geographic wage levels described in § 413.231 of this part.
( 5 ) An adjustment factor to account for the most recent estimate of increases in the prices of an appropriate market basket of goods and services provided by ESRD facilities.
( b ) *Determining the per treatment base rate for calendar year 2011.* Except as noted in § 413.174(f), the ESRD prospective payment system combines payments for the composite rate items and services as defined in § 413.171 of this part and the items and services that, prior to January 1, 2011, were separately billable items and services, as defined in § 413.171 of this part, into a single per treatment base rate developed from 2007 claims data. The steps to calculating the per-treatment base rate for 2011 are as follows: ( 1 ) *Per patient utilization in CY 2007, 2008, or 2009.* CMS removes the effects of enrollment and price growth from total expenditures for 2007, 2008 or 2009 to determine the year with the lowest per patient utilization.
( 2 ) *Update of per treatment base rate to 2011.* CMS updates the per-treatment base rate under the ESRD prospective payment system in order to reflect estimated per treatment costs in 2011.
( 3 ) *Standardization.* CMS applies a reduction factor to the per treatment base rate to reflect estimated increases resulting from the facility-level and patient-level adjustments applicable to the case as described in § 413.231 through § 413.235 of this part.
( 4 ) *Outlier percentage.* CMS reduces the per treatment base rate by 1 percent to account for the proportion of the estimated total payments under the ESRD prospective payment system that are outlier payments as described in § 413.237 of this part.
( 5 ) *Budget neutrality.* CMS adjusts the per treatment base rate so that the aggregate payments in 2011 are estimated to be 98 percent of the amount that would have been made under title XVIII of the Social Security Act if the ESRD prospective payment system described in section 1881(b)(14) of the Act were not implemented.
( 6 ) *First 4 Years of the ESRD prospective payment system.* During the first 4 years of ESRD prospective payment system (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013), CMS adjusts the per-treatment base rate in accordance with § 413.239(d).
[75 FR 49200, Aug. 12, 2010]
# C_2006077EN.01000101.xml

| 30.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 March 2006

(2006/C 77/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2012 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4617 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69185 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4148 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5742 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,11 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9450 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,728 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9595 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5259 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,850 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6365 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7060 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4098 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3218 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9914 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9476 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 171,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6146 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6432 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 990,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,440 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,598 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,3960 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,789 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2012

JPY

Japanese yen

141,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4617

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69185

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4148

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5742

ISK

Iceland króna

86,11

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9450

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

28,728

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9595

RON

Romanian leu

3,5259

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,850

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6365

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7060

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4098

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3218

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9914

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9476

KRW

South Korean won

1 171,35

ZAR

South African rand

7,6146

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6432

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 990,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,440

PHP

Philippine peso

61,598

RUB

Russian rouble

33,3960

THB

Thai baht

46,789

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Locsin

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Locsin							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 9, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Secretary of Foreign Affairs Teodoro Locsin, Jr., in Manila, the Philippines. Deputy Secretary Sherman conveyed gratitude for Secretary Locsin’s commitment and contributions to the alliance and the rules-based international order. The Deputy Secretary and Secretary of Foreign Affairs spoke about the importance of maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific, and also discussed the Kremlin’s war of aggression against Ukraine and its global ramifications.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonPhilippinesUkraine

Back to Top
§ 598.320 Finance. The term *finance* includes engaging in any transaction involving funds, other assets, property, or interest in property, that are derived, obtained, or retained from, directly or indirectly, narcotic drugs, controlled substances, or listed chemicals. This includes the transporting, transmitting, or transferring of any such assets, property, or interests in property that creates the appearance that the funds, assets, or property were legitimately acquired, furthers the illicit activity, conceals or disguises the assets, avoids reporting requirements, or otherwise promotes the carrying on of illicit activity, such as money laundering. Note 1 to § 598.320 :
The definition of *finance* listed above is specific to this part and not any other parts of Chapter 31. *See* § 598.101.
[86 FR 26669, May 17, 2021]