alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2014

- 0924 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 228

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In corporate AFM TR in AFM Emergency Procedure 1 .0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 953 $ 81,005.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 81,005 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour ) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

**Executive Order 12866:**
Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action ”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
#### § 34.5 Postponement of medical examination.

Whenever, upon an examination, the medical examiner is unable to determine the physical or mental condition of an alien, completion of the medical examination shall be postponed for such observation and further examination of the alien as may be reasonably necessary to determine his/her physical or mental condition. The examination shall be postponed for aliens who have an acute infectious disease until the condition is resolved. The alien shall be referred for medical care as necessary.
#### Theodore Lynn FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 45842.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 14, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 294 So.2d 691.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on the corresponding date shown below:

*License Number:*                     018529F.                

*Name:*                     Egbert Sylvester Jeffers dba Eggi's  Express Shipping.                

*Address:*                     1004 Halsey Street, Brooklyn, NY 11207.                

*Date Revoked:*                     August 27, 2009.                

*Reason:*                     Failed to maintain a valid bond.                

*License Number:*                     020818N.                

*Name:*                     Logistics Inc. dba Logistics W.W. Inc. dba  Infinity Freight Services.                

*Address:*                     8621 Bellanca Ave., Ste. 104B, Los Angeles, CA 90045.                

*Date Revoked:*                     August 23, 2009.                

*Reason:*                     Failed to maintain a valid bond.                

*License Number:*                     020141N.                

*Name:*                     Vanguard International, Inc.                

*Address:*                     117 Lakewood Circle, San Mateo, CA 94402.                

*Date Revoked:*                     August 27, 2009.                

*Reason:*                     Failed to maintain a valid bond.                

Sandra L. Kusumoto,

Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. E9-21678 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
HomeDivisions...Diplomatic Corps Order of Precedence and Dates of Presentation of Credentials

# 									Diplomatic Corps Order of Precedence and Dates of Presentation of Credentials							

Office of the Chief of Protocol

Diplomatic Corps Order of Precedence

In accordance with relevant Articles of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, heads of diplomatic missions appear on the Diplomatic Corps Order of Precedence list in their respective classes and in the order of the date and time of assuming their duties.

**ORDER OF PRECEDENCE**

**Reported to the Office of the Chief of Protocol as of February 27, 2024**

**AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND PLENIPOTENTIARY**For Bilateral Missions and Heads of Delegation (European Union and African Union)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPrediction of Composite Laminate Fracture: Micromechanics and Progressive FractureThis report describes an investigation to predict first-ply failure and final fracture in selected composite laminates subjected to inplane loads. The laminates were composed of glass fiber and graphite fibers in epoxy matrices. Failure envelopes based on first-ply failure and laminate fracture were generated for combined loading of these laminates. Predictions were evaluated by micromechanics-based theory and progressive fracture. The results show that, for most cases, combined tensile loading significantly enhanced the laminate fracture stress in comparison to the uniaxial loading.Document ID19970010089Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGotsis, P. K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Chamis, C. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Minnetyan, L.*(Clarkson Univ. Potsdam, NY United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107331E-10456NASA-TM-107331Accession Number97N15324Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-5BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010089.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 801.501 Notice of pilot program covered transactions.

Parties to a pilot program covered transaction may notify the Committee of the transaction by filing with the Committee a written notice pursuant to § 800.401(a) of this chapter and this subpart.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        37,344
<SECURITIES>                                                  26,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 61,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                    3,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             143,516
<PP&E>                                                        89,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                                61,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               179,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         60,629
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     120,609
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (1,798)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 179,870
<SALES>                                                      162,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             251,425
<CGS>                                                         35,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 91,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             170,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (7,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  (2,187)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (5,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (5,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.36)



</TABLE>
§ 402.115 Collection of penalty or assessment. ( a ) Once a determination by HHS has become final, CMS is responsible for the collection of any penalty or assessment.
( b ) The General Counsel may compromise a penalty or assessment imposed under this part, after consultation with CMS or OIG, and the Federal government may recover the penalty or assessment in a civil action brought in the United States district court for the district where the claim was presented or where the respondent resides.
( c ) The United States or a State agency may deduct the amount of a penalty and assessment when finally determined, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, from any sum then or later owing to the respondent.
( d ) Matters that were raised or that could have been raised in a hearing before an ALJ or in an appeal under section 1128A(e) of the Act may not be raised as a defense in a civil action by the United States to collect a penalty under this part.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Ralph MONTGOMERY.

No. 80-K-2882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Michael Ralph Montgomery, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Caddo. No. 115683.

Denied. Adequate by review in case of conviction.
Exhibit 99.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO 18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350

CERITFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PurchaseSoft, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas B. Marsh, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/ Thomas B. MarshThomas B. Marsh, Secretary, Treasurer and Acting CFO |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated November 7, 2002                                                  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARWINDER DHILLON SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72685 

Agency No. A070-970-088 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Harwinder Dhillon Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of 

law, including claims of due process violations. Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72685 

F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that 

Singh did not show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United 

States citizen wife. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) 

(absent a colorable legal or constitutional claim, the court lacks jurisdiction to 

review the agency’s discretionary determination regarding hardship). Singh’s

contentions that there was no basis for the finding that the qualifying relative’s son 

can provide for her financially and that the agency failed to fully consider a 

psychological evaluation are not supported by the record, and therefore do not raise 

colorable claims to invoke jurisdiction. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 

926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“To be colorable in this context, . . . the claim must have 

some possible validity.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 

In light of this dispositive determination, we do not reach Singh’s contention 

regarding whether 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(i) (engaging in terrorist activity) bars

him from cancellation of removal. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 

(9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21508]



[[Page 46250]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11860 and <greek-i>11861]


North Carolina Disaster <greek-i> NC-00020

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of North Carolina dated 08/31/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 08/12/2009.
    Effective Date: 08/31/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/31/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Craven.
Contiguous Counties:
    North Carolina: Beaufort; Carteret; Jones; Lenoir; Pamlico; Pitt.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      5.500
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.750
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11860 6 
and for economic injury is 11861 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are North 
Carolina.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: August 31, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-21508 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Upcoming actions regarding Veolia Environmental Services Andrea Morgan to: kathyandria, milipele, dougharris 07/12/2012 07:56 AM Cc: Genevieve Damico, David Ogulei

Kathy, Maxine, and Doug,

EPA will soon be providing public notice of its proposed actions regarding a request by Veolia Environmental Services (Veolia), located at 7 Mobile Ave, Sauget, St Clair County Illinois to revise their Clean Air Act Title V. As the American Bottom Conservancy and Washington University Law Clinic have been involved in previous issues regarding this facility EPA would like to inform you of the proposed action and request suggestions to improve public participation in the permitting process.

As directed by EPA , Veolia requested a revision to its Title V operating permit to incorporate feedrate limits for heavy metals based on testing performed in 2008. In the proposed action EPA intends to revise Veolia's Title V operating permit, through the significant modification process, by incorporating into the Title V permit feedrate limits for heavy metals. EPA proposes to establish feedrate limits for mercury, semivolatile metals and low volatile metals.

EPA would like to invite you to provide suggestions on how you would like to see the permitting process run. Such suggestions can include the most suitable methods of communication to inform community members of public hearings, the types of informational materials that would be most beneficial to community members as well as the best methods of making such materials available. While we may not be able to act on all of the suggestions, they will all be taken into consideration. We would like to invite you to participate in a call with EPA staff as well as a representative from Veolia , Doug Harris, to discuss suggestions. If you would be interested in participating, please provide us with times during the week of either July 16 or July 23 that you would be available to participate.

Thank you,

Andrea Morgan Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division Phone: (312) 353-6058 | Fax: (312) 692-2920
# OAR Box 

# 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 217 ) ll-K-(I)-3 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:56

AM Sheet 217 of 325 P. 1P. 2 

# A \

# PI I/I— i \ c n II-K-(I)-3 0
INDUSTRIA L BOILE RNSP S ANALYSI S OVERVIEW O F EE A IMPAC T STUDY . Prepare d fo r Informa l Analysi s Workin g Group . Augus t 15 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-3 0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 4 THROUGH 8 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             229
<SECURITIES>                                       905
<RECEIVABLES>                                      255
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                        227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,798
<PP&E>                                           6,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              585
<PREFERRED>                                        195
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,098
<SALES>                                          1,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,437
<CGS>                                              402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     70
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 70
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        70
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>