Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 20 / Monday, February 2, 2009 / Notices 5817 

1See, e.g., letters to Villares from Laurie Parkhill, 

dated April 18, 2008, May 22, 2008, July 11, 2008, 

July 30, 2008, and December 19, 2008. 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in the Department’s 

Policy Bulletin 98.3, ‘‘Policies 

Regarding the Conduct of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders;’’ Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) 

(‘‘Sunset Policy Bulletin’’). The Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews provides further information 

regarding what is required of all parties 

to participate in Sunset Reviews. 

Dated: January 27, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–2197 Filed 1–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–533–843 

Certain Lined Paper Products from 

India: Extension of Time Limits for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–3692. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 31, 2007, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

lined paper products from India, 

covering the period April 17, 2006 to 

August 31, 2007. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 61621 

(October 31, 2007). On October 7, 2008, 

the Department published the 

preliminary results of this review. See 

Certain Lined Paper Products from 

India: Notice of Preliminary Results of 

the First Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 58548 

(October 7, 2008). The final results of 

this review are currently due no later 

than February 4, 2009. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

final results of a review within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within that time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the final results to a maximum of 180 

days. See also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit of Final 

Results 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

review within the original time limit. 

Interested parties have raised complex 

accounting issues in their case and 

rebuttal briefs that require the 

Department to further analyze its 

positions with respect to these issues. 

Thus, additional time is necessary to 

complete the final results. Therefore, the 

Department is fully extending the final 

results by 60 days. The final results are 

now due no later than April 5, 2009. As 

this date falls on a Sunday, the final 

results are due April 6, 2009. See Notice 

of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

This extension is in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: January 23, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–2183 Filed 1–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–825] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 2, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At the request of interested parties, 

the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain stainless steel bar from Brazil 

for the period February 1, 2007, through 

January 31, 2008. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Request for 

Revocation in Part, and Deferral of 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 16837 

(March 31, 2008). On October 27, 2008, 

we extended the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of the review by 

90 days until January 29, 2009. See 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 63695 

(October 27, 2008). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published. 

If it is not practicable to complete the 

review within these time periods, 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows 

the Department to extend the time limit 

for the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. See also 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

January 29, 2009, for several reasons. 

Specifically, the Department has granted 

the respondent, Villares Metals S.A. 

(Villares), several extensions to respond 

to the original and supplemental 

questionnaires.1 Thus, the Department 

needs additional time to review and 

analyze the responses submitted by 

Villares. Further, the Department 

requires additional time to review issues 

such as corporate affiliations and steel 

grades of products reported by Villares, 

as it will affect the Department’s 

matching methodology in this case. 

Finally, in response to the petitioners’ 

cost allegation submitted on November 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES