alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3049 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend section 1505 of the Higher Education Amendments of 1986 to 
provide for the continuity of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of 
    American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 1505 of the Higher Education Amendments of 1986 to 
provide for the continuity of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of 
    American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUITY OF BOARD.

    Section 1505(i) of the Higher Education Amendments of 1986 (20 
U.S.C. 4412(i)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the period at the 
        end of the first sentence the following: ``or to recommend 
        another individual if the member does not consent to be 
        reappointed''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) If the President has not transmitted to the Senate a 
        nomination to fill the position of a member covered by such a 
        recommendation within 60 days from the date that the member's 
        term expires--
                    ``(A) if the member consents to reappointment, the 
                member shall be deemed to have been reappointed for 
                another full term to the Board, with all the 
                appropriate rights and responsibilities; or
                    ``(B) if the member does not consent to 
                reappointment, an individual recommended by the Board 
                under paragraph (1) shall be deemed to have been 
                appointed for a full term to the Board with all the 
                appropriate rights and responsibilities.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Djibouti

61 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Djibouti	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Summit	  Matthew MillerJune 13, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Djibouti	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Djiboutian Foreign Minister Youssouf	  May 3, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Djibouti	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Djibouti	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Joint Meeting with Secretary Austin and President Guelleh of the Republic of Djibouti, President Bazoum of the Republic of Niger, and President Hassan Sheikh from the Federal Republic of Somalia	  December 13, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin Before Meeting With Djiboutian President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh, Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum, and Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022Walter E. Washington Convention CenterWashington, D.C. 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Djibouti	  November 7, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Djibouti	  August 18, 2022 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
§ 412.248 Number of members needed for a decision or a hearing. ( a ) *A quorum.* A quorum, consisting of at least a majority of the MGCRB members, one of whom is representative of rural hospitals if possible, is required for making MGCRB decisions.
( b ) *Number of members for a hearing.* If less than a quorum is present for an oral hearing, the chairman with the consent of the hospital may allow those members present to conduct the hearing and to prepare a recommended decision, which is then submitted to a quorum.
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.350 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart implements section 1877 of the Act, which generally prohibits a physician from making a referral under Medicare for designated health services to an entity with which the physician or a member of the physician's immediate family has a financial relationship.
( b ) This subpart does not provide for exceptions or immunity from civil or criminal prosecution or other sanctions applicable under any State laws or under Federal law other than section 1877 of the Act. For example, although a particular arrangement involving a physician's financial relationship with an entity may not prohibit the physician from making referrals to the entity under this subpart, the arrangement may nevertheless violate another provision of the Act or other laws administered by HHS, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, or any other Federal or State agency.
( c ) This subpart requires, with some exceptions, that certain entities furnishing covered services under Medicare report information concerning ownership, investment, or compensation arrangements in the form, in the manner, and at the times specified by CMS.
( d ) This subpart does not alter an individual's or entity's obligations under— ( 1 ) The rules regarding reassignment of claims (§ 424.80 of this chapter);
( 2 ) The rules regarding purchased diagnostic tests (§ 414.50 of this chapter);
( 3 ) The rules regarding payment for services and supplies incident to a physician's professional services (§ 410.26 of this chapter); or
( 4 ) Any other applicable Medicare laws, rules, or regulations.
[85 FR 77656, Dec. 2, 2020]
### Request for Inform ation FAA-2015-0173 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Dear Mr. Marlow: This letter is in regards to youramendment request to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part11 of the Federal Aviation Regu lations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA ­ 2015 ­ 0173. The amendment requests to operat e the SHOTOVER U1. Wit h full payload, this unmanned aircraft (UA) has a maximum take ­ off weight of 66 lbs. If th e petitioner’s intent is to operate this UA above the weight of 55 lbs the Federal Aviation Administra tion (FAA) requires the additional information not addressed in the SHOTOVER manu al to process your petition.

x A detailed description of the aircraft design and configuration for the SHOTOVER U1 UAS focusing on the UAS features and flight ch aracteristics to include, but not limited to: o Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery equipment if applicable o Operational history with supporting statistics; particularly where Alas ka Aerial Media was the principal operator o Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS o Lessons learned from repairs and alterations performed dur ing operations to include design changes and fixes due to operational failure(s) o Details of any injuries or property dama ge resulting from f light/ground operations o Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly ­ away, loss of control, etc. x Copies of manuals, photographs, videos/t elemetry may be provided as support x Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety with unmanned aircraft in excess of 55 lbs. Please submit the addi tional information (non ­ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information is submitte d, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via e ­ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/05/2016 . If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket withou t notifying you further. FAA Office o f Rulemakin g Sent : Monday, November 21, 2016 12:40 PM To: ryan@akaerialmedia.com Page 1 of 1 Request for Information FAA -201 5 -017 3

11 /21 /201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/ 9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/? ae=Item&t=IPM.Not...
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Christopher Lee Evans, Appellant

No. 06-14-00134-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 115th District Court of 

Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16,724). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We modify the judgment of the trial court, and as modified, affirm the judgment of the 

trial court.

We note that the appellant, Christopher Lee Evans, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 1007.7 Prosecutorial authority requirements of Unit. A Unit must be organized according to one of the following three options related to a Unit's prosecutorial authority: ( a ) The Unit is in the office of the State Attorney General or another department of State government that has statewide authority to prosecute individuals for violations of criminal laws with respect to fraud and patient or resident abuse or neglect in the provision or administration of medical assistance under a State plan implementing Title XIX of the Act.
( b ) If there is no State agency with statewide authority and capability for criminal fraud or patient or resident abuse or neglect prosecutions, the Unit has established formal written procedures ensuring that the Unit refers suspected cases of criminal fraud in the State Medicaid program or of patient or resident abuse and neglect to the appropriate prosecuting authority or authorities, and coordinates with and assists such authority or authorities in the prosecution of such cases.
( c ) The Unit has a formal working relationship with the office of the State Attorney General, or another office with statewide prosecutorial authority, and has formal written procedures for referring to the State Attorney General or other office suspected criminal violations and for effective coordination of the activities of both entities relating to the detection, investigation, and prosecution of those violations relating to the State Medicaid program. Under this working relationship, the office of the State Attorney General, or other office, must agree to assume responsibility for prosecuting alleged criminal violations referred to it by the Unit. However, if the State Attorney General finds that another prosecuting authority has the demonstrated capacity, experience, and willingness to prosecute an alleged violation, he or she may refer a case to that prosecuting authority, as long as the office of the State Attorney General maintains oversight responsibility for the prosecution and for coordination between the Unit and the prosecuting authority.
§ 405.1128 Action of the Council. ( a ) After it has reviewed all the evidence in the administrative record and any additional evidence received, subject to the limitations on Council consideration of additional evidence in § 405.1122, the Council will make a decision or remand the case to an ALJ or attorney adjudicator.
( b ) The Council may adopt, modify, or reverse the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decisionor recommended decision.
( c ) The Council mails a copy of its decision to all the parties at their last known addresses. For overpayment cases involving multiple beneficiaries where there is no beneficiary liability the Council may choose to send written notice only to the appellant. In the event the decision will result in a payment to a provider or supplier, the Medicare contractor must issue any electronic or paper remittance advice notice to that provider or supplier.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5124, Jan. 17, 2017]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1128

_____________________________
K ELVIN W ILLIS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. September 15, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kelvin Willis, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT
12





SUMMARY
OF OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION








Except
for the Employment Agreement in Exhibit 6 of this report, the Company does not
have any written contractual compensation arrangements with any of its employees
or directors, including Executive Officers.





During
2010, the Company’s Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officers (the
Company’s “Named Executive Officers”) are scheduled to receive the following
compensation from the Company:


Compensation
      Arrangement
            
            2010
      Scheduled AmountBase
      salary
            
            $  256,100
      (CEO); $101,000 (PFO)401(k)
      matching contributions
            
            5,880
      (maximum)Section
      125 plan matching contributions (1)
            
            450
      (maximum)Management
      bonus
            
            will
      be determined at year-endPet
      health benefits (1)
            
            500
      (maximum)Family
      medical benefits (1)
            
            will
      depend on future eventsTravel
      expense reimbursement (2)
            
            8,000
      (CEO); 2,000 (PFO)








During
2010, the Company’s Directors are scheduled to receive the following
compensation from the Company:





Compensation
      Arrangement
            
            Ernst
      Hoyer
            
            
            Barbara
      Payne
            
            
            James
      BeesonBase
            
            $
            21,000
            
            
            $
            21,000
            
            
            $
            21,000Executive
      Committee
            
            
            4,000
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Audit
      Committee Chairman
            
            
            2,000
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Travel
      Expense Reimbursement (2)
            
            
            500
            
            
            
            700
            
            
            
            500





(1)   CEO
and PFO participate on the same basis as other eligible employees.


(2)   Estimated
2010 travel expenses on behalf of UTMD business.  The Company
reimburses its employees and directors for authorized business
expenses.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.3 Scope of benefits. ( a ) *Covered services.* The SMI program helps pay for the following: ( 1 ) Medical and other health services such as physicians' services, outpatient services furnished by a hospital or a CAH, diagnostic tests, outpatient physical therapy and speech pathology services, rural health clinic services, Federally qualified health center services, IHS, Indian tribe, or tribal organization facility services, and outpatient renal dialysis services.
( 2 ) Services furnished by ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), HHAs, CORFs, and partial hospitalization services and intensive outpatient services provided by CMHCs.
( 3 ) Other medicial services, equipment, and supplies that are not covered under Medicare Part A hospital insurance.
( b ) *Limitations on amount of payment.* ( 1 ) Medicare Part B does not pay the full reasonable costs or charges for all covered services. The beneficiary is responsible for an annual deductible and a blood deductible and, after the annual deductible has been satisfied, for coinsurance amounts specified for most of the services.
( 2 ) Specific rules on payment are set forth in subpart I of this part.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 24981, June 12, 1992; 58 FR 30668, May 26, 1993; 59 FR 6577, Feb. 11, 1994; 66 FR 55328, Nov. 1, 2001; 75 FR 73613, Nov. 29, 2010; 88 FR 82177, Nov. 22, 2023]
§ 416.48 Condition for coverage—Pharmaceutical services. The ASC must provide drugs and biologicals in a safe and effective manner, in accordance with accepted professional practice, and under the direction of an individual designated responsible for pharmaceutical services. ( a ) *Standard: Administration of drugs.* Drugs must be prepared and administered according to established policies and acceptable standards of practice. ( 1 ) Adverse reactions must be reported to the physician responsible for the patient and must be documented in the record.
( 2 ) Blood and blood products must be administered by only physicians or registered nurses.
( 3 ) Orders given orally for drugs and biologicals must be followed by a written order, signed by the prescribing physician.
( b ) [Reserved]
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 25, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: John Bradfield , EPA
- OAQPS SUBJECT: September 16, 2014 Meeting between Joe Goffman, EPA and Santee Cooper

Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** On September 16 , 2014, Joe Goffman met with Santee Cooper to discuss issues concerning the proposed Clean Power P lan for existing power plants and nuclear power facilities that are under construction. **Attendees** Pamela Williams, Senior Vice President of Corporate Services , Santee Cooper Elizabeth Warner, Vice President of Legal Services , Santee Cooper Stephen Fotis , Counsel, Van Ness Feldman LLP Janet Anderson , Counsel, Van Ness Feldman LLP Joe Goffman, EPA
§ 417.444 Special rules for certain enrollees of risk HMOs and CMPs. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to any Medicare enrollee of a risk HMO or CMP who meets the following conditions: ( 1 ) On February 1, 1985, was enrolled— ( i ) In an HMO or CMP that had in effect a cost contract entered into under section 1876 of the Act in accordance with regulations in effect before February 1, 1985; or
( ii ) In an HCPP that was being reimbursed on a reasonable cost basis under section 1833(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
( 2 ) Has continued enrollment in the same entity without interruption or disenrolled after February 1, 1985, and later reenrolled in the same entity.
( b ) *Retention of nonrisk status* — ( 1 ) A “nonrisk” enrollee is a Medicare beneficiary who meets the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section and is enrolled in an entity that enters into a risk contract as an HMO or CMP. A “nonrisk” enrollee may retain nonrisk status indefinitely unless CMS determines under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, that the enrollee's status must be changed, or the enrollee requests the change, as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) A nonrisk enrollee of a risk HMO or CMP is not entitled to additional benefits under § 417.442.
( c ) *Conversion to risk status* — ( 1 ) *Conversion based on CMS determination.* If CMS determines that, for administrative reasons or because there are fewer than 75 current nonrisk Medicare enrollees remaining in the HMO or CMP, all of its nonrisk Medicare enrollees must be covered under the risk provisions of the contract, the conversion process is as follows: ( i ) CMS notifies each affected enrollee of the decision at least 90 days prior to the effective date.
( ii ) The nonrisk Medicare enrollees complete and sign forms stating that they understand and accept the new rules and benefits that will be applicable to them.
( iii ) The HMO or CMP notifies each affected enrollee, in writing, at least 30 days in advance, of the date upon which his or her coverage under the risk portion of the contract takes effect.
( 2 ) *Conversion based on enrollee's request.* A nonrisk Medicare enrollee requests, using a form identical or similar to the form described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, that he or she be covered under the risk portion of the contract.
( d ) *Notification.* An HMO or CMP converting from a cost contract to a risk contract must, within 60 days of signing the risk contract, inform nonrisk enrollees of their right to remain nonrisk Medicare enrollees or to convert to risk enrollment at any time in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
[58 FR 38073, July 15, 1993]
# C_2006010EN.01001403.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/14

---

Action brought on 17 November 2005 by the European Parliament against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-403/05)

(2006/C 10/29)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 17 November 2005 by the European Parliament, represented by R. Passos, E. Waldherr, and K. Lindahl, acting as Agents.

The European Parliament claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision approving a project on the security of the borders of the Philippines, to be financed by budgetary line 19 10 02 of the general budget of the European Communities (Philippine Border Management Project; No ASIA/2004/016-924), adopted in compliance with Regulation (EEC) No 443/92 on financial and technical assistance to, and economic cooperation with, the developing countries in Asia and Latin America (1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision approving a project on the security of the borders of the Philippines, to be financed by budgetary line 19 10 02 of the general budget of the European Communities (Philippine Border Management Project; No ASIA/2004/016-924), adopted in compliance with Regulation (EEC) No 443/92 on financial and technical assistance to, and economic cooperation with, the developing countries in Asia and Latin America (1);

1

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Parliament requests the annulment of the Commission's decision on the grounds that the Commission has exceeded its powers.

The main aim of the contested decision is to combat terrorism by implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) on the fight against terrorism. By contrast, the aim of Regulation No 443/92 is to aid development by means of financial, technical and economic cooperation. The powers of execution delegated by that basic act give the Commission responsibility for ensuring the management of the financial and technical assistance, and for economic cooperation. A measure intended to help the government of the Philippines make its borders more secure, with the aim of combating terrorism, exceeds the powers of execution provided for in the basic act and is therefore illegal.

The contested decision has not been published in the Official Journal. The European Parliament did not receive notice of its full text until 9 September 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 52, 27.02.1992, p. 1

1

---