alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000726990
<NAME> UNITED SECURITY BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           16541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           14860
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 15410
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      49264
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             792
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               820
<LOANS>                                         285044
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  404667
<DEPOSITS>                                      354829
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3815
<LONG-TERM>                                       4456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         30479
<OTHER-SE>                                       10370
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  404667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  22174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2975
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   510
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 25659
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                9693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10306
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            15353
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      324
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  91
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  12081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6251
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.91
<LOANS-NON>                                       2147
<LOANS-PAST>                                       331
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2865
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      541
<RECOVERIES>                                       157
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2805
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2805
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/06 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                       0000727010                
<NAME>                                      Elexsys International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-28-1996
<CASH>                                         320
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20731
<ALLOWANCES>                                   310
<INVENTORY>                                    13359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35550
<PP&E>                                         88312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 58928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 68192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25458
<BONDS>                                        15095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9364
<OTHER-SE>                                     18275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   68192
<SALES>                                        36501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36501
<CGS>                                          29713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               49
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2803
<INCOME-TAX>                                   164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2639
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .27
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3213

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972

relating to the dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

Act of 1972 relating to the dumping of dredged material

in Long Island Sound, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Island Sound

5 Preservation and Protection Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3213 IH

1 SEC. 2. DUMPING OF DREDGED MATERIALS IN LONG

2 ISLAND SOUND.

3 Section 106(f) of the Marine Protection, Research,

4 and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1416(f)) is

5 amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(f) DUMPING OF DREDGED MATERIAL IN LONG IS7 LAND SOUND.—

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No dredged material from

9 any Federal project, or from any non-Federal

10 project, that contains any of the constituents prohib11 ited as other than trace contaminants (as defined by

12 the Federal ocean dumping criteria set forth in sec13 tion 227.6 of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regula14 tions) may be dumped in Long Island Sound or

15 Block Island Sound, except in cases in which it is

16 demonstrated to the Administrator that the dumping

17 of the dredged material containing such constituents

18 will not cause significant undesirable effects, includ19 ing the threat associated with bioaccumulation of

20 such constituents in marine organisms.

21 ‘‘(2) FEDERAL PROJECTS EXCEEDING 25,000

22 YARDS.—In addition to other provisions of law and

23 notwithstanding the specific exclusion relating to

24 dredged material in the first sentence in section

25 102(a), any dumping of dredged material in Long

26 Island Sound from a Federal project (or pursuant to
3

•HR 3213 IH

1 Federal authorization) by a non-Federal applicant

2 exceeding 25,000 cubic yards shall comply with the

3 criteria established pursuant to the second sentence

4 of section 102(a) relating to the effects of dumping.

5 ‘‘(3) RELATION TO OTHER LAW.—Subsection

6 (d) shall not apply to this subsection.’’.

Æ
# Senegal

106 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 7, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 7, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Senegalese President Sall	  June 7, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Unrest in Senegal	  Matthew MillerJune 3, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Senegal	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Regional Conference of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) on Ending Human Trafficking 2023	  Cindy DyerApril 25, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Senegal National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Senegal	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Zeya’s Travel to The Gambia and Senegal March 12-14, 2023	  March 10, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Dr. John Nkengasong, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy	  John N. NkengasongFebruary 28, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Senegal	  February 27, 2023 

previous page12345…11next page

Back to Top
# C_2006102EN.01001102.xml

| 28.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4161 — SEI/VWBN)

(2006/C 102/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4161. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4161. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
- DipNote Home
- About
- All Posts
- Browse by Topic

HomeDipNote...DipNote: Travel

# 						DipNote: Travel					

		Subscribe		

7 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerIan G. BrownleeRichard R. Verma

Select a LocationItalyMoroccoPeru

Select a Release TypeDipNote: Travel

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsForeign Service Institute

          -    DipNote: Travel  		A Long-shot Tale: My Story of Becoming an American and Serving My Country	  Richard R. VermaJanuary 4, 2024 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		Don’t Wait — Check Your Passport’s Expiration Date	  September 1, 2022 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		Consider these Five Tips before Traveling Internationally during Atlantic Hurricane Season	  June 28, 2022 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		Five Tips to Consider before Traveling Abroad during Atlantic Hurricane Season	  June 1, 2021 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		It’s Not Just a Family Matter: Helping Those Involved in International Parental Child Abduction	  May 25, 2021 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		COVID-19 Response: Locally Employed Staff on the Front Lines of Global Repatriation Efforts	  May 10, 2021 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		An Honor to Serve	  Ian G. BrownleeMay 4, 2021 

Back to Top
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 9

- 60804

ANTHONY DWAYNE WILLIAMS, T’ESHKA RENYELL YOUNG,

Petitioner s
- Appellant s

v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States Tax Court Tax Court Case No

. 26670

- 17L Tax Court Case No. 26671

- 17L

Before WIENER, HAYNES , and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Ignoring the Sixteenth Amendment, appellants argue that an income tax on their wages is unco nstitutional. What we said years ago in rejecting the appeal of a tax protestor still rings true: “We perceive no need to refute these arguments with somber reasoning and copious citation of precedent; to do so might suggest that these arguments have some colorable merit.” Crain v. Commissioner , 737 F.2d 1417, 1417 (5th Cir. 1984). Moreover, appellants were not allowed to challenge their underlying tax liability in the collection due

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60804 Document: 00515385036 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2020No. 19

- 60 804

2 process hearing because they had previously received notices of deficie ncy for the tax years at issue but did not dispute that tax liability. I.R.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B). Although Anthony Williams could challenge the imposition of his frivolous

- return penalty in the due process hearing

— he did not receive a deficiency notice for t hat penalty or otherwise have an earlier opportunity to
contest , that penalty was proper. See I.R.C. § 6702(a), 2(A) (allowing a penalty of $5,000 if the person files an incorrect return “based on a position which the Secretary has identified as frivolous ”). As we noted at the outset, Williams’s position that he did not receive wages because he was a “non

- federal worker” paid by a private employer is frivolous . And the Commissioner has recognized it as such. IRS Notice 2010

- 33(III)(7) (citing Revenue Ru ling 2006

- 18). AFFIRMED. Case: 19-60804 Document: 00515385036 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2020
EXHIBIT 10 (j)

     Schedule  identifying  substantially  similar  agreements,  among  Merrimac
Industries,  Inc.  ("Merrimac")  and  each  of  the  following  persons,  to the
Agreement  constituting  Exhibit  10(j) to the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of
Merrimac for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1998.

Two Year Payment

Robert V. Condon
Richard E. Dec
Brian R. Dornan
Reynold K. Green
Jacob Lin

One Year Payment

James J. Logothetis
Joseph McAndrew
Olivia McKay
Neil S. Thomas


                                     -1-
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30561 Conference Calendar

__________________ MELVIN SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 86-CA-1180 "H"

- - - - - - - - - - December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Melvin Smith argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to reconsider (F ED . R. C IV . P. 60(b) motion). We have reviewed the record and determined that Smith's contentions are barred by the law-of-the-case doctrine. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Traillour Oil Co. , 987 F.2d 1138, 1150 (5th Cir. 1993). As Smith's appeal is without arguable merit, it is frivolous. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.No. 95-30561 -2- We caution Smith that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Smith is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court. APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2006074EN.01001701.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/17

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2006 — Volkswagen v OHIM

(Case T-317/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Variant - Earlier national word mark DERBIVARIANT - Refusal of registration by the Board of Appeal - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 74(1) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 74/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties:

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Risthaus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndörfer and G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Nacional Motor, SA (Martorelles, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Action

brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 June 2003 (Case R 610/2001-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Nacional Motor, SA and Volkswagen AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) of 17 June 2003 in so far as it dismisses the application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign Variant for goods and services other than those in Classes 7, 12 and 37. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) of 17 June 2003 in so far as it dismisses the application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign Variant for goods and services other than those in Classes 7, 12 and 37.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action.

| 3 | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Henry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer, PHI Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kof PHI Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.PHI GROUP, INC.

/s/ Henry FahmanHenry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer

Dated: April 7, 2011           

 

 

----
#### TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and W. L. Cobb Construction Company, Appellants, v. Arlin MULLINS, Appellee.

No. 73-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 17, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.