alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Joseph C. Christenson, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of PPTVISION, Inc.

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | January  26, 2004                      |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                   |
|   | /**s/ Joseph C. Christenson**          |   |
|   | Joseph C. Christenson,                 |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
P i o P i co C l e v e l and H o ll ada y to: S te v e H ill 02/ 17 / 2012 04 : 14

PM B cc: Cl e v e l and .H o ll aday

S te v e,

A n e x amp l e y ou c an u s e to fa c ili tate ma k i ng the c ompa ri s on between the two s i te s i s l o c ated i n the

I n i t i a l P re v e n t i o n o f S i g n i f i c a n t D eter i o r a t i o n P er m i t f o r t h e P a l m d a l e H y b r i d P o w er P r o ject do ck et fo l de r s umma ry l o c ated i n r egu l at i on s .go v--

Y ou c an get the r

e b y go i ng to http://www.epa.go v / r eg i on9/a i r

/pe rm i t/ r9

- pe rm i t s- i ss ued.html and go i ng down the page to


### P re v ent io n o f S ig n i f

i c a nt D eter io r a t io n ( P S D ) P er m i t s Iss ued b y R e gio n 9 and l oo k i ng fo r P a l mda l e H y b r i d P owe r P r o j e c t whe r

e the :

Do ck et ID fo r

the Do ck et F o l de r S umma ry i s g i v en:
E P A- R 09 -OA R

- 2011

- 0560, th e n g o t o p a g e 2 o f th e do c k e t f o l d er su mm ary
a nd l ook f

o r th e f o ll o w i n g do c u m e n t I D: E P A- R 09 -OA R

- 2011

- 0560

- 0028 w h i c h po i n t s t o

Supp l e m e n t t o P S D A pp li c a t i o n (A Q M o d e li n g ( 12 / 14 / 10 )); R e s p o n s e t o E PA re A n a l ys is G o t o p ag e s 8

- 11 s ect i o n 4, e s p ec i a ll y p ag e s 9 a nd 10 a nd l oo k a t t h e c o m p a r i so n s o f s u r f a ce r o u g hn e ss

- C l e ve
# C_2006048EN.01002901.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 December 2005 — Bauwens v Commission

(Case T-154/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Career development report - 2001/2002 appraisal exercise - Article 7 of the General Implementing Provisions - Deadline for submission of an application to refer a matter to the Joint Evaluation Committee - Suspension)

(2006/C 48/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Bauwens (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Application for

Annulment of the counter-signing officer's decision of 15 July 2003 not to refer a matter to the Joint Evaluation Committee in the course of the procedure for the drawing-up of the applicant's career development report under Article 7 of the General Provisions Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the counter-signing officer's decision of 15 July 2003 not to refer the matter to the Joint Evaluation Committee; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the counter-signing officer's decision of 15 July 2003 not to refer the matter to the Joint Evaluation Committee;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 26.6.2004.

1

---
smhi-ex1012_7.htm



Exhibit 10.12

 

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

 

Directors who are not employees of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $50,000 and each of such directors is also granted equity awards pursuant to the SEACOR Marine Holding Inc.'s 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.39 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Fourteenth Meeting of the United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement Environmental Affairs Council

# 									Fourteenth Meeting of the United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement Environmental Affairs Council							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 14, 2021

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Monica Medina and Assistant U.S. Trade Representative (AUSTR) for Environment and Natural Resources Kelly Milton are representing the United States at the 14th meeting of the United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) Environmental Affairs Council (EAC).

CAFTA-DR Parties work together to strengthen environmental protection, effectively enforce environmental laws, and promote public participation for environmental decision-making, in accordance with Environment Chapter obligations.  Priorities include combatting the illegal trade of wildlife; conserving tropical forests; tackling the climate crisis; stemming illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; improving air quality; enhancing solid waste management; promoting public access to environmental information; and increasing civil society’s knowledge of environmental laws.

Costa Rica’s Ministry for the Environment and Energy will host the virtual meeting.  The EAC will review implementation of the CAFTA-DR Environment Chapter and associated environmental cooperation activities.  It will also analyze the work of the CAFTA-DR Secretariat for Environmental Matters to promote environmental monitoring, public participation in environmental decision-making, and environmental awareness.  The EAC will host an open session to answer questions from the public.  The theme for the public session is “Public Participation in Environmental Matters in CAFTA-DR Countries.”

For press inquiries, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDominican RepublicEnvironmentOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
```

[114th Congress Public Law 181]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 447]]

Public Law 114-181
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To take certain Federal lands located in Lassen County, California, into 
trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: June 22, 2016 -  [H.R. 2212]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA.

    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 
taken into trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, 
subject to valid existing rights.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust pursuant to 
subsection (a) is the approximately 301 acres of Federal land under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management identified 
as ``Conveyance Boundary'' on the map titled ``Susanville Indian 
Rancheria Land Conveyance'' and dated December 31, 2014.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be allowed at any time 
on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a).

    Approved June 22, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2212 (S. 1761):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-314 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 114-202 (Comm. on Indian Affairs) accompanying S. 
1761.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 161 (2015):
                                    Nov. 30, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 162 (2016):
                                    June 10, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6324
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS LAMONT MCCULLERS, a/k/a Meek, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51-BO) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetrius Lamont McCullers, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appellant's motion to compel the Government to make a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion or motion under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 (1996), for a downward departure based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McCullers , No. CR-96-51-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          90,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,848
<PP&E>                                         824,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                 577,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     354,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000446

10-OCT-2017

08:56 AM
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary for Management & Resources Richard Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois Foreign Minister Radegonde

# 									Deputy Secretary for Management & Resources Richard Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois Foreign Minister Radegonde							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 1, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State for Management & Resources Richard Verma met with Seychelles Foreign Minister today in Victoria, Seychelles. The Deputy Secretary and the Foreign Minister discussed their shared commitment to democracy and human rights, both in the region and globally, and to confronting climate change. They agreed that the new U.S. embassy in Victoria and its return to a full-time diplomatic presence would bolster already strong bilateral cooperation, especially in combatting corruption, preserving ocean biodiversity and increasing maritime security.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborClimate ChangeDemocracyHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonSeychelles

Back to Top
§ 419.90 Basis and scope of subpart. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements sections 1861(kkk) and 1834(x) of the Act, which establish the rural emergency hospital Medicare provider type and the payment requirements applying to such entities.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart describes the methodologies used to determine payment for REH services and the monthly facility payment amount paid to REHs.
# C_2006131EN.01002602.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/26

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven) — Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, Stichting Natuur en Milieu v College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen

(Case C-174/05) (1)

1

(Authorisation to place plant protection products on the market - Directive 91/414/EEC - Article 8 - Active substance named ‘aldicarb’ - Validity of Article 2(3) of Decision 2003/199/EC)

(2006/C 131/47)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, Stichting Natuur en Milieu

Applicants:

Defendant: College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen

Defendant:

Joined party: Bayer CropScience BV

Joined party:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Validity of Article 2(3) of Council Decision 2003/199/EC of 18 March 2003 concerning the non-inclusion of aldicarb in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance (OJ 2003 L 76, p. 21)

Operative part of the judgment

Examination of the question referred has not disclosed any factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Article 2(3) of Council Decision 2003/199/EC of 18 March 2003 concerning the non-inclusion of aldicarb in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance.

---

(1)  OJ C 155 of 25.6.2005.

1

---
#### § 416.173 Publication of revised payment methodologies and payment rates.

CMS publishes annually, through notice and comment rulemaking in the Federal Register and/or via the Internet on the CMS Web site, the payment methodologies and payment rates for ASC services and designates the covered surgical procedures and covered ancillary services for which CMS will make an ASC payment and other revisions as appropriate.

[76 FR 74582, Nov. 30, 2011]
PUBLIC LAW 114–177—JUNE 13, 2016 130 STAT. 431 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4605: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Apr. 18, considered and passed House. 

May 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–177 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 615 6th 

Avenue SE in Cedar Rapids, Iowa as the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. Pasker Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. 1ST CLASS TERRYL L. PASKER POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 615 6th Avenue SE in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. 

Pasker Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. Pasker Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 13, 2016. 

June 13, 2016 

[H.R. 4605] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2904 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2904

  To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to ensure that any lease 
  entered into by a Federal agency for office, meeting, storage, and 
other space necessary to carry out the functions of the Federal agency 
 shall be subject to the leasing requirements of the Public Buildings 
                              Act of 1959.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1996

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 to ensure that any lease 
  entered into by a Federal agency for office, meeting, storage, and 
other space necessary to carry out the functions of the Federal agency 
 shall be subject to the leasing requirements of the Public Buildings 
                              Act of 1959.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 7 of the 
Public Buildings Act of 1959 (40 U.S.C. 606) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(g) Applicability to Leases of Federal Agencies.--The provisions 
of this section and sections 11 and 12 of this Act shall apply to any 
lease of space by a Federal agency in the same manner and to the same 
extent as such provisions would apply if such space were being leased 
by the Administrator; except that certain functions which the 
Administrator would carry out under such provisions if such space were 
being leased by the Administrator shall be carried out by the Federal 
agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Daniel CANNON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-1050.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1980.

*971Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Alan R. Dakan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and PEARSON, DANIEL, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Daniel Cannon, found guilty by a jury of robbery without the use of a weapon, as charged, appeals his conviction and sentence to seven years imprisonment followed by three years probation. He claims error on two grounds. First, Cannon argues that an impermissibly suggestive pre-trial identification so tainted an in-court identification as to deprive him of a fair trial. Second, he contends that the trial court erred in failing to sentence him pursuant to the Florida Youthful Offender Act. § 958.011 et seq., Fla.Stat. (1979).

Error, if any, in permitting the victim’s in-court identification of the defendant was not properly preserved for review by this court, and was therefore waived. *Douglas v. State,*328 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976); *Thomas v. State,*249 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

As to the appellant’s second point, the record presented upon appeal does not reflect error in the trial court's failure to sentence under the Youthful Offender Act. We affirm the conviction and sentence without prejudice to appellant’s future application to the trial court pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. *Jenrette v. State,*373 So.2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).