alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 137.261 Does the Secretary have the authority to immediately reassume a PSFA? Yes, the Secretary may immediately reassume operation of a program, service, function, or activity (or portion thereof) and associated funding upon providing to the Self-Governance Tribe written notice in which the Secretary makes a finding: ( a ) of imminent substantial and irreparable endangerment of the public health caused by an act or omission of the Indian Tribe; and
( b ) the endangerment arises out of a failure to carry out the compact or funding agreement.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th 

day of April, A.D. 2018, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Troy Michael Robino, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-17-00172-CR

Trial Court No. 45773-B

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Troy Michael Robino, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 6th day of June, A.D. 2018.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
# C_2006052EN.01000601.xml

| 2.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3905 — Tesco/Carrefour (Czech Republic and Slovakia))

(2006/C 52/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3905. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3905. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Charles James FREEMAN, a/k/a James Williams, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-844.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1981.

Charles James Freeman, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
#### Provie Curtis BATEMAN, Appellant, v. Richard D. BATEMAN, Sr., Appellee.

No. 74-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 3, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Nov-30-1998
<CASH>                          1,446,089
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   291,360
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,997
<PP&E>                          12,937,748
<DEPRECIATION>                  (5,715,288)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,992,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           258,394
<BONDS>                         000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<COMMON>                        000
<OTHER-SE>                      8,647,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,992,292
<SALES>                         1,809,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,241,985
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,171,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,070,206
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,070,206
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 3,232,132
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    4,302,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   42.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                   42.59
        

</TABLE>
# CA2006078EN.01000201.xml

| 31.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 78/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 78/2

---

JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE (JRC)

JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE (JRC)

Publication of a vacancy for a Deputy Director-General (grade A*15) — Brussels

Appointment of an official under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations

COM/2006/10021

(2006/C 78 A/02)

The Commission is seeking to recruit a Deputy Director-General in the Directorate-General Joint Research Centre.

To be eligible candidates must:

| — | be a citizen of a European Union Member State, |
| --- | --- |

—

be a citizen of a European Union Member State,

| — | hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies, |
| --- | --- |

—

hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies,

| — | have at least 15 years’ postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission including at least five years at a senior management level, |
| --- | --- |

—

have at least 15 years’ postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission including at least five years at a senior management level,

15 years’ postgraduate

five years at a senior management level

| — | have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages. |
| --- | --- |

—

have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages.

The Deputy Director-General will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*15 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

and follow the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration.

The closing date for registration is 28 April 2006. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

28 April 2006

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Amendment--Public Meeting of the AHRQ National Advisory 
Council for Healthcare Research and Quality Subcommittee On Quality 
Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and Children's Health 
Insurance Programs

    With this correction notice, the Agency for Healthcare Research and 
Quality (AHRQ) informs public of an Amendment made to the notice 
subject mentioned above which was published on August 20, 2009, Vol. 
74, No. 160, pages 42079-42080, The amendment is to add at the end of 
section SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, the following: ``As previously 
noted, the meeting is open to the public and can also be joined via 
Webcast. The link to online registration for Webcast is http://
www.ConnectLive.com/events/AHRQ2009.''

    Dated: September 3, 2009.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-21690 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43754

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TRISTA LEE CLAYTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 557

Filed: June 3, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Samuel A. Hoagland, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of three years, for possession of a controlled substance with intent 

to deliver, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Trista Lee Clayton pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to 

deliver. I.C. § 37-2732(a). In exchange for her guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed 

including an allegation that she was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Clayton to 

a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Clayton filed 

an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Clayton appeals.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Clayton’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3301 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3301

      To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to require 
 consideration of a depository institution's record with regard to the 
   number and amount of fees imposed by the institution on consumer 
      accounts and consumer transactions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 1996

  Ms. Waters introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to require 
 consideration of a depository institution's record with regard to the 
   number and amount of fees imposed by the institution on consumer 
      accounts and consumer transactions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bank Fee Accountability Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF BANK FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of 
1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) Consideration of Bank Fees.--In assessing and taking into 
account, under subsection (a), the record of a regulated financial 
institution in meeting credit needs, the appropriate Federal financial 
supervisory agency shall consider the institution's record with regard 
to the number and amount of fees imposed by the institution in 
connection with consumer accounts and consumer transactions, including 
any increase in the number or amounts of such fees, any decrease in 
such number or amounts, and any other discernible trend in such number 
and amounts.''.
    (b) Findings and Conclusions.--Section 807(b)(1)(A)(i) of the 
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2906(b)(1)(A)(i)) is 
amended by inserting ``, including factors required to be considered 
under section 804(c)'' before the semicolon at the end.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006143EN.01002202.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria di secondo grado di Trento lodged on 17 March 2006 — Fendt Italiana Srl v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio Dogane di Trento

(Case C-145/06)

(2006/C 143/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria di secondo grado di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fendt Italiana Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Dogane Ufficio Dogane di Trento

Defendant:

Question referred

Are the taxation arrangements in Article 62 of Legislative Decree No 504/95 compatible with Directive 2003/96/EC (1) which restructured the Community framework for the taxation of energy products where those products are used for purposes other than as motor fuel or heating fuel?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.133 What happens to my zero-percent certificate of indebtedness if the offering is terminated by the Secretary?

Upon the termination of this offering by the Secretary, the zero-percent certificate of indebtedness ceases to roll over; the proceeds will be paid by the ACH method to the bank account at a financial institution that you designated in your TreasuryDirect ® account as your primary bank account.
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Kevin L. Cornwell dated December 21, 
1992. 

                                   ARTICLE IV

                                  COMPENSATION

      4.2 Severance Payments.  If Cornwell is terminated at any time after the
term of this Agreement (of December 21, 1992) for any reason other than pursuant
to Sections 3.2(b), 3.2(c) or 3.2(d), the Company agrees that it will pay
Cornwell a lump sum payment equal to his annual compensation, inclusive of base
salary and management bonus, averaged over the prior three calendar years,
within thirty (30) days of the date his employment terminates, plus two
additional lump sum payments, each of the same amount as the first payment, on
the ensuing two anniversary dates of his termination.  In the event of a "Change
of Control" as defined in Section 1.2, for each $1.00 per share of common stock
in excess of an equivalent $14.00 per share purchase price by an acquiring
entity of a controlling interest of UM's common stock, of for each portion of
$1.00 above the $14 threshold price, each annual lump sum severance payment
shall be increased by Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), or applicable
proration thereof.

The other surviving applicable provisions of the Agreement including ARTICLE I,
DEFINITIONS, shall continue to apply.
HomeProviding Opportunities for Women’s Economic Rise...Economic Dialogues

# 									Economic Dialogues							

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

We have engaged several of our allies on women’s economic empowerment through senior economic dialogues. Bilateral economic dialogues are a useful channel to promote women’s economic empowerment to help facilitate business, trade, and investment. We are excited to announce these ongoing economic partnerships are moving full steam ahead with a gender-lens on our efforts to advance U.S. economic prosperity.
        - Republic of Korea
        - Israel
        - Greece
        - Iceland
        - 3+1 (Greece, Cyprus, Israel and U.S.)
        - United Arab Emirates

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsCyprusEconomic AffairsGreeceIcelandIsraelOffice of Commercial and Business AffairsSouth KoreaSri LankaUnited Arab EmiratesWomen's IssuesWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
#### Robert D. GUSTAFSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 7659.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1980.

Gold, Little, Simon, Weems & Bruser, Henry B. Bruser, III, Alexandria, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-appellants.

William Henry Sanders, Jimmie C. Peters, Jena, John King, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, SWIFT and STOKER, JJ.

STOKER, Judge.

This case was consolidated for hearing on certain peremptory exceptions and on appeal with companion suits including *Elliott, et al. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, et al.,*387 So.2d 1383 (La.App 3rd Cir., 1980), which is being decided this date.

The issues and applicable law in this case are substantially the same as those in *Elliott v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company,*supra. For the reasons we assigned therein we reverse and set aside the judgment of the trial court dated October 12, 1979, sustaining the peremptory exceptions filed on July-10, 1979, on behalf of Curtis Elliott, individually and as administrator of the estate of the minor, Randy Elliott, and on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automo*1390bile Insurance Company. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. The costs of this appeal are assessed to exceptors-appellees.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Fifth United States-Republic of Korea Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Threats

# 									Fifth United States-Republic of Korea Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Threats							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 7, 2023

On November 6 and 7, the United States hosted the Fifth U.S.-Republic of Korea (ROK) Working Group to counter cyber threats posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). Led by Deputy Special Representative for the DPRK Dr. Jung Pak and ROK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director-General for North Korean Nuclear Affairs Lee Jun-il, the meeting underscored the close collaboration between the U.S. and ROK governments to disrupt the DPRK’s ability to generate revenue through malicious cyber activity, crypto thefts, and IT workers, which it uses to fund its unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs.

The United States and the ROK are pursuing a wide range of actions to prevent and disrupt DPRK cryptocurrency heists and other cyber-enabled revenue generation; address DPRK cyber espionage against the defense sector; and dismantle DPRK IT worker infrastructure and networks. The Working Group meeting also focused on greater diplomatic outreach coordination, information sharing, and capacity building for nations vulnerable to the DPRK threat.

For the latest update on tactics used by DPRK IT workers to fraudulently obtain remote employment with companies around the world, read the most recent public service announcement that provides additional guidance on the DPRK IT Worker Advisory. Follow the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy on LinkedIn and Twitter (@StateCDP) for more.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCyber SecurityNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonTechnology

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 11


            GUARANTY BANCSHARES HOLDING CORPORATION
            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE



                                     1996      1995      1994


Number of shares
   beginning of year               380,877   380,877   380,877

Issued during year                       0         0         0

Number of shares - end of year     380,877   380,877   380,877

Weighted average number of
   shares outstanding              372,958   373,728   374,375


NOTE:     Weighted average calculated based upon actual number of
          days outstanding for each share, exclusive of 7,452
          shares held in treasury.
§ 421.122 Performance standards. ( a ) *Development of standards.* In addition to the performance criteria (§ 421.120), CMS develops detailed performance standards for use in evaluating intermediary performance which may be based on historical performance, application of acceptable statistical measures of variation to nationwide intermediary experience during a base period, or changing program emphases or requirements. These standards are also developed considering intermediary experience and evaluate the specific requirements of each functional responsibility or criterion.
( b ) *Factors beyond intermediary's control.* To identify measurable factors that significantly affect an intermediary's performance, but that are not within the intermediary's control, CMS will— ( 1 ) Study the performance of intermediaries during the base period, and
( 2 ) Consider the noncontrollable factors in developing performance standards.
( c ) *Publication of standards.* The development and revision of standards for evaluating intermediary performance is a continuing process. Therefore, before the beginning of each evaluation period, which usually coincides with the Federal fiscal year period of October 1-September 30, CMS publishes the performance standards as part of the Federal Register notice describing the performance criteria issued under § 421.120(c). CMS may not necessarily publish the criteria and standards every year. CMS interprets the statutory phrase “before the beginning of each evaluation period” as allowing publication of the criteria and standards after the Federal fiscal year begins, as long as the evaluation period of the intermediaries for the new criteria and standards begins after the publication of the notice.
[59 FR 682, Jan. 6, 1994]