alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Joseph J. Lazzara certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ScientificTechnologies Incorporated;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

a)	designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure , or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) 	disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004		
																		/s/ Joseph J. Lazzara
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











I,
      Donald
      C. Grenesko, the Senior Vice President/Finance and Administration of Tribune
      Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      Sept. 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Tribune
      Company.

















/s/
                Donald C. Grenesko
              Donald
                C. Grenesko
              Senior
                Vice President/
              Finance
                and Administration
              
              
              November
                2, 2007
HomeBrazil

# Brazil

220 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Sao Paulo, Brazil: Graded-The American School of Sao Paulo: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Escola Americana do Rio de Janeiro: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Recife, Brazil: American School of Recife: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Porto Alegre, Brazil: Pan American School of Porto Alegre: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Brasilia, Brazil: American School of Brasilia: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Raquel Krahenbuhl of TV Globo	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 25, 2024JW Marriott HotelRio de Janeiro, Brazil 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Brazil Co-Host “Rising to the Challenge on Haiti” Multinational Security Support Mission Ministerial Meeting in Rio de Janeiro	  February 22, 2024 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 22, 2024JW Marriott HotelRio de Janeiro, Brazil 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Kamikawa and Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho	  February 22, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Japanese Foreign Minister Kamikawa Yoko and Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul  Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 22, 2024JW Marriott HotelRio de Janeiro, Brazil 

previous page1234…22next page

Back to Top
# C_2006053EN.01000602.xml

| 3.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4098 — Investcor/Autodistribution Group)

(2006/C 53/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4098. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4098. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1005-000]

On March 9, 2009, the City of Boulder, licensee for the Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application for a Small Conduit Exemption in lieu of an application for a new license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project is located on water supply facilities of the City of Boulder, in Boulder and Nederland Counties, Colorado.

                    The license for Project No. 1005 was issued for a period ending August 31, 2009. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the project is otherwise                           ( print page 46421)                        disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other applicable section of the FPA.                

The Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project is subject to section 15 of the FPA. Notice is hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 1005 is issued to the City of Boulder for a period effective September 1, 2009 through August 31, 2010, or until the issuance of a Small Conduit Exemption for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a Small Conduit Exemption (or other disposition) does not take place on or before August 31, 2010, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-21733 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Charles E. BELGARD v. Alfred A. MANSOUR, Dist. Judge.

No. 80-KH-1618.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Charles E. Belgard, applying for writs of mandamus, habeas corpus, and cer-tiorari. Parish of Rapides. No. 170651.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
,,

[4910-13-P[

~

1- - l)

lJTING SY"MIlOL

A"A- \0\

l

* * * * * * *

It has been found occurrences of main landing gear (MLG) trailing arm

pins broken due to a fatigue mechanism induced by an excessive torque

applied during the assemblage of auxiliary door support attachment and

consequent deformation of the MLG trailing ann axle. A broken pin can

lead to loss of the MLG trailing.arm axle, disconnecting the trailing arm

from the main strut, which affects the airplane controllability on ground.

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

ACTION: Final rule,

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list

(DOT),

-145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes

EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes; and EMB-145, -145E

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod

RlN 2120-AA64

(Docket No. FAA-2009-0659; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM~060-AD; Amendmen

(~91 ;2.010-03-01-

39-*****; AD  -** -**}

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 39

{

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          54,769
<SECURITIES>                                   196,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,520
<INVENTORY>                                    934,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,487,908
<PP&E>                                       1,627,387
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,043,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,232,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          309,700
<BONDS>                                        120,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,768
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,741,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,232,020
<SALES>                                      1,869,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,882,268
<CGS>                                          775,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,749,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3225 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3225

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expedite payment 
adjustments for durable medical equipment under part B of the medicare 
              program based upon inherent reasonableness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1996

   Mr. Shays (for himself, Mr. Schiff, and Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expedite payment 
adjustments for durable medical equipment under part B of the medicare 
              program based upon inherent reasonableness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPEDITING IMPLEMENTATION OF PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR DURABLE 
              MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER MEDICARE BASED UPON INHERENT 
              REASONABLENESS.

    The first sentence of section 1834(a)(10)(B) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(10)(B)) is amended by striking the period and 
inserting the following: ``, except that (notwithstanding any provision 
of such paragraphs or this title) the Secretary shall make an 
adjustment in payment for an item under this subsection pursuant to 
this subparagraph through the issuance of an interim final regulation 
issued not later than 1 year after the Secretary initially proposes to 
make the adjustment.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### E. W. BLISS COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[53 C. Cls., 47; 253 U. S., 187.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Petitioner averred that it granted the Government’s request for permission to purchase from another certain torpedoes containing a device in which the petitioner claimed patent rights, upon a royalty the amount of which was “ to be later settled,” and that the Government purchased; but it also alleged that - negotiations to settle the amount to be paid failed and that petitioner never consented to the use of the patented invention without payment of an amount of royalty which the Government refused to pay. *Sold,*that no express or implied contract to pay any royalty, cognizable by the Court of Claims under Judicial Code, sec. 145, could be derived from the facts stated.

To maintain an infringement suit against the United States under the act of June 25, 1910, the claimant must have at least such an interest in the patent as independently of that act would support a suit against a defendant other than the United States.

A grant by a prospective patentee of the “ sole and exclusive license ” to use the invention for the full term of patents to be procured on designated articles only when sold to the United States, the grantee undertaking to pay a royalty on; each such article fitted with the invention and the grantor at its own cost to procure patent and to defend • “ the license to use * * * hereby granted ” against infringers, is a mere license and will not sustain a suit for infringement.

Mr.. Justice Clarke

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 17, 1920.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Ronald E. Kimbrough, Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough


Ronald E. Kimbrough
Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
§ 591.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges authorized. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, Internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
§ 407.62 Termination of coverage. ( a ) *Other coverage.* An individual who enrolls in other coverage as described in § 407.55(b) will have his or her enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit terminated on either of the following bases: ( 1 ) If the individual notifies SSA of such coverage consistent with § 407.59(b), their enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit will be terminated effective the first day of the month after the month of notification unless the individual requests a different, prospective termination date that is not after the effective date of enrollment in other health insurance coverage, as described in § 407.55(b).
( 2 ) If the individual does not notify SSA of this coverage consistent with § 407.59(b), their enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit will be terminated effective the first day of the month after the month in which there is a determination of the individual's enrollment in coverage described in § 407.55(b).
( b ) *Death.* Enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit ends on the last day of the month in which the individual dies.
( c ) *Nonpayment of premiums.* If an individual fails to pay the premiums, the Part B-ID benefit enrollment will end as provided in the rules for Part B premiums set forth in part 408 of this chapter.
( d ) *Request by individual.* An individual may request disenrollment at any time by notifying SSA that he or she no longer wants to be enrolled in the Part B-ID benefit. Such individual's enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit ends with the last day of the month in which the individual provides the disenrollment request, except for an individual who loses coverage under a State buy-in agreement, as described in § 407.50(b)(2)(i).
( e ) *Entitlement to Hospital Insurance benefits.* Enrollment in the Part B-ID benefit ends effective the last day of the month prior to the month that the individual becomes entitled to benefits under § 406.5, § 406.12, or § 406.13 of this subchapter.
( f ) *Appeals.* An involuntary termination of the Part B-ID benefit for reasons described at § 407.62(a)(2), (b), or (c) of this subsection, will be considered an initial determination that is appealable under § 405.904(a)(1) of this subchapter. An individual can request to continue receiving Part B-ID benefits while waiting for an appeals decision.
#### Jacob Burkhard, Respondent, *v.*The George Hagemeyer *&*Sons’ Lumber Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

March, 1898.)

Appeal — Affirmance on a conflict o£ evidence.

Where the evidence upon the question, whether certain teams were ■furnished hy the plaintiff to the defendant or whether they were furnished to a third person, is conflicting and evenly balanced, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the District Court in the City of Hew York, for the eleventh judicial district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff by the justice thereof, without a jury. The nature of the action and the material facts, are stated in the opinion.

Richard B. Kelly (W. C. Beecher, of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis S. Goebel, for respondent.

Giegerich, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $172.50, claimed to be due plaintiff for horses, harness and drivers furnished to the defendant, at its request, during the month of April, 1897, The issues in the action were joined by written complaint and answer, the latter containing a general denial. The substantial question of fact litigated upon the trial was, whether or not the horses were furnished to the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that they were, while the defendant denies having hired or used them, insisting that the same were furnished to one August K. Kaufold upon his request. There was sufficient evidence in the case to support a finding either way, and the justice having found for the plaintiff upon a conflict of evidence, we should not disturb his conclusion. Lynes v. Hickey, 4 Misc. Rep. 522.

We have examined with great care the exceptions taken at the trial to rulings respecting the admissibility of evidence and fail to discover the existence of any substantial error which would require the reversal of the judgment.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Beekmah, P. J., and Gildersleeve, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.