alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nathan Hutkoff, Appellant, *v.*Peter Herter et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

John F. Coffin, for appellant.

George M. Leventritt, for respondents.

Olcott, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered herein for the sum of $378.32 upon a verdict of a jury, in plaintiff’s favor, and from 'an order denying a motion for a new *769trial, and the only questions raised by the appellant relate to the rejection and reception o£_certain testimony.

We have carefully examined the record and while we find certain of the seventy exceptions 'taken by the appellant to have been justified, we believe that the learned trial justice did not fall into any error which was material, nor improperly admit any evidence of sufficient importance to have affected the verdict of the jury or to have distracted the minds of its members from the issues of the action.

The exceptions are numerous and we shall not refer to them in detail inasmuch as we read from the record that the case was fairly presented to the jury upon the relevant and material testimony which was adduced, and after a careful and impartial charge.

The verdict does not appear to have been against the weight of evidence nor contrary thereto.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to respondents, W
# C_2006001EN.01000101.xml

| 4.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 January 2006

(2006/C 1/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1875 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4621 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68725 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3550 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5535 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5736 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,981 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8425 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6717 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,705 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6010 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6145 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3809 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2081 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7427 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9642 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 193,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4792 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5834 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 548,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,486 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,445 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,488 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1875

JPY

Japanese yen

139,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4621

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68725

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3550

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5535

ISK

Iceland króna

74,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5736

CZK

Czech koruna

28,981

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8425

RON

Romanian leu

3,6717

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,705

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6010

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6145

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3809

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2081

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7427

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9642

KRW

South Korean won

1 193,97

ZAR

South African rand

7,4792

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5834

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 548,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,486

PHP

Philippine peso

62,445

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1400

THB

Thai baht

48,488

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### James HUDSON, a/k/a James Howard, a/k/a James Hutchins, a/k/a James Adams, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 78-772, 78-897.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 16, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1979.

Charles I. Poole, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken these appeals from the denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
#### CATHERINE PISCATORE AND CARMINE PISCATORE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. V. LA ROSA & SONS, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued May 16, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, *Jacob E. Max.*

For the defendant-appellant, *John L. Ridley.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court. We add, however, what the opinion writer doubtless had in mind, that the absence from the stipulated facts of proof tending to show that Mrs. Piscatore had eaten or drunk anything else that might have made her ill in nowise lifted from the plaintiffs the burden of proving affirmatively that the defendant’s foodstuff was unwholesome and deleterious and that Mrs. Piscatore’s illness resulted therefrom. It was not incumbent upon defendant to prove that the illness was due to other causes; nor would it *365have been sufficient for the plaintiffs to show that the ailment *might*have resulted from the eating of the macaroni. Nevertheless, we think that the proofs support the factual finding in plaintiff’s favor.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Poetes, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEEETY, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— The Chibe Justice, Hague, JJ. 2.
# C_2006154EN.01000302.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Order of the Court of 23 February 2006 — Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities, Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)

(Case C-171/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Freedom to provide services - Competition - Regulation of the activities of players' agents - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2006/C 154/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Laurent Piau (represented by: M. Fauconnet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet and O. Beynet, Agents), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (represented by: F. Louis and A. Vallery, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 26 January 2005 in Case T-193/03 Piau v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 15 April 2002 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning the Fédération Internationale de Football Association's regulation governing the activities of players' agents

Piau v Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Mr Piau is ordered to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Piau is ordered to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

---

(1)   OJ C 155 25.06.2005

1

---
# C_2006143EN.01000802.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 May 2006 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union

(Case C-217/04) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 - European Network and Information Security Agency - Choice of legal basis)

(2006/C 143/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: M. Bethell, Agent, and by Lord Goldsmith, N. Paines and T. Ward, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: K. Bradley and U. Rösslein, Agents); Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Veiga and A. Lopes Sabino, Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: T. Pynnä and A. Guimaraes-Purokoski, Agents); Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Benyon and M. Shotter, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (OJ 2004 L 77, p. 1) — Choice of legal basis

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice President - Chief
Financial Officer of E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1.
  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
  the quarter ended December 3, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
  the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  Date:
  January 12,
2006
  
  /s/ Dennis
J.
  CurtinDennis J.
  Curtin, Senior VicePresident -
  Chief Financial Officer -44-
# C_2006093EN.01002701.xml

| 21.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4131 — Bain/Texas Instruments)

(2006/C 93/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4131. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4131. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







Our report on our audits of the balance sheets of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. as of July 31, 2010 and 2009 for the years then ended and on the statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows and for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2010, included in this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010, dated October 29, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866), and on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-112865 and 333-136678) previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.










/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP








Roseland, New Jersey


October 29, 2010
Exhibit 23.1


                                            Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-81308) on Form S-8 of Alfacell  Corporation  of our report dated  October 12,
2001, relating to the balance sheets of Alfacell Corporation as of July 31, 2001
and  2000,  and the  related  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'  equity
(deficiency),  and cash  flows  for each of the years in the  three-year  period
ended July 31, 2001 and the period from August 24, 1981 (date of  inception)  to
July 31, 2001,  which report  appears in the July 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K of Alfacell  Corporation.  Our report dated October 12, 2001, as it relates
to the  financial  statements  for the  period  from  August  24,  1981 (date of
inception) to July 31, 2001, is based on the report of other  auditors as to the
amounts included therein for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception)
to July 31, 1992.

Our report dated October 12, 2001 contains an explanatory  paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered  recurring losses from  operations,  has a working
capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise  substantial  doubt
about its ability to continue as a going  concern.  The financial  statements do
not  include  any  adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of that
uncertainty.


/s/  KPMG LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
October 29, 2001
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

GARRETT DEAN DOOR, Sr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-35545 

D.C. Nos. 1:17-cv-00119-SPW 

1:14-cr-00056-SPW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Garrett Dean Door, Sr., appeals pro se from the district 

court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for 

aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a), and assault with 

intent to commit aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(1). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-35545

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review the district court’s denial 

of a section 2255 motion de novo, see United States v. Manzo, 675 F.3d 1204, 

1209 (9th Cir. 2012), and we affirm.

Door contends that the government failed to prove he has a quantum of 

Indian blood and that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the 

sufficiency of the government’s evidence as to this element of Indian status. The 

record shows that the government’s evidence of Door’s Indian blood included

testimony by the victim, the FBI agent, another witness, and the tribal enrollment 

record. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, 

Door’s sufficiency of the evidence claim fails. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 

307, 319 (1979). Furthermore, counsel’s decision not to challenge the sufficiency 

of the government’s evidence does not amount to constitutionally deficient 

performance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 (1984).

We treat Door’s arguments regarding the Fifth Amendment, the Fourteenth 

Amendment, and newly discovered evidence as a motion to expand the certificate 

of appealability. So treated, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); Hiivala

v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #23, June 17 – 23, 2009 

An overall above average wet season for Afghanistan has 

given way to more typical dry weather during the month of 

June. During the winter months an usually deep snow pack 

built up. As temperatures began to warm during the spring 

months, as is typical, the snow began to melt. However, 

precipitation continued, causing numerous rain-on-snow 

events. These events are known to cause rapid snow melt. As 

a resulted many parts of Afghanistan reported flooding 

triggered by melt water. 

In June much of the country dried out, but also temperatures 

changed from running above normal in the low lands, to more 

seasonable temperatures. Temperatures, which had been 

normal to below normal in the northeast, have since become 

slightly cooler than normal. 

Snow pack now remains confined to the higher elevations of 

the northeast, as is typically for this time of year, and light 

precipitation also remains in the northeast. 

The coming week will continue to bring dry, warm weather to 

much of the country, although wet and cooler conditions are 

likely in the northeast. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Temperature anomaly for the 1st dekad of June 

2009. 

 Source: USGS

Figure 3. Snow depth as of June 14, 2009

Source: NOAA/CPC Data from AFWA
### (Http://Www.dji.com/) Store (Http://Store.dji.com/) Products (Http://Www.dji.com/Products) ∠ DJI Events (Http://Event.dji.com) ∠ Support(Http://Www.dji.com/Support) Community ∠ Fly Safe (Http://Flysafe.dji.com) 

## " 

# (http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2) Overview(Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2) Features (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2/Feature) No Fly Zones (Http://Www.dji.com/Fly-Safe/Category-Mc)

Specs (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2/Spec) Videos (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2/Video) Downloads (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2/Download) Wiki (Http://Wiki.dji.com/En/Index.php/Phantom_2) Dealers (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2/Dealer) Buy Now(Http://Store.dji.com/Product/Phantom-2?From=Buy_now)



### General Features Ready to Fly, Multifunctional Quad-rotor System Customized H3-2D and H3-3D Gimbal Support Precision Flight and Stable Hovering 25min Flight Time & Smart Battery Auto Return-to-Home & Landing Advanced Power Management Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC) Easy Battery Replacement Self-tightening Propeller Video Downlink Support CAN-Bus Expansion Module 

### Aircraft

DJI Smart Battery Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1000g Hover Accuracy (Ready To Fly) Hover Accuracy (Ready To Fly) Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m Max Yaw Angular Velocity Max Yaw Angular Velocity 200°/s Max Tilt Angle Max Tilt Angle 35° Max Ascent / Descent Speed Max Ascent / Descent Speed Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s Max Flight Speed Max Flight Speed 15m/s(Not Recommended) Diagonal Length Diagonal Length 350mm Flight Time Flight Time 25mins Take-O ff Weight Take-O ff Weight ≤ 1300g Operating Temperature Operating Temperature -10°C ~ 50°C Supported Battery Supported Battery DJI Smart Battery
Type Type 3S LiPo Capacity Capacity 5200mAh, 11.1V Charging Environment Range Charging Environment Range 0 °Cto 40 °C Discharging Environment Range Discharging Environment Range -20 °Cto 50 °C

### 2.4GHz Remote Control Operating Frequency Operating Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Communication Distance (Open Area) Communication Distance (Open Area) 1000m Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) -97dBm Working Current/Voltage Working Current/Voltage 120 mA@3.7V Built-In LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity Built-In LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity 3.7V, 2000mAh

About DJI (http://www.dji.com/company) Contact DJI (http://www.dji.com/contact) News (http://www.dji.com/info) Media Coverage (http://www.dji.com/info/media-coverage) Showcase (http://www.dji.com/showcase) DJI University(http://edu.dji.com/) Careers (http://we.dji.com/en.html) DJI Wiki (http://wiki.dji.com/en) After-sales Service Policies(http://www.dji.com/service) DJI Developer(https://developer.dji.com/) (http://www.dji.com/) Copyright © 2015 DJI All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy (http://www.dji.com/policy) Terms of Use (http://www.dji.com/terms)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.01


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Silicon Valley Research, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and for each
of the two years then ended and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-86725)and in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-87979)of
Silicon Valley Research, Inc. of our report dated May 12, 2000.



/s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP


San Francisco, California
June 27, 2000

                                      38
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1072 Remand by the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) If CMS requests remand, and the affected party concurs in writing or on the record, the ALJ may remand any case properly before him or her to CMS for a determination satisfactory to the affected party.
( b ) The ALJ may remand at any time before notice of hearing decision is mailed.