# C_2006010EN.01002702.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/27 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Action brought on 17 October 2005 — Valero Jordana v Commission

(Case T-394/05)

(2006/C 10/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Merola and I. van Schendel, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

| — | annul:
(a)
the decision of the Director General of the Legal Service not to award him, for the 2004 promotion exercise, priority points under Article 5(2)(a) of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, as is apparent from the Sysper 2 computerised system, confirmed by the Appointing Authority's decision of 16 November 2004 rejecting the applicant's appeal lodged on 4 October 2004. (b)
the award, in the 2004 promotion exercise, of points awarded on appeal for reasons other than a finding of merit in that period, priority points for work in the interest of the institution and transitional priority points; (c)
as regards the points in (b), the merit list of officials in Grade A5 for promotion exercise 2004, published in Administrative Notices No 114-2004 of 20 September 2004 and No 119-2004 of 27 September 2004, and the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 under the 2004 promotion exercise, published in Administrative Notice No 130-2004 of 30 November 2004; and the decision not to enter the applicant on those lists; | (a) | the decision of the Director General of the Legal Service not to award him, for the 2004 promotion exercise, priority points under Article 5(2)(a) of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, as is apparent from the Sysper 2 computerised system, confirmed by the Appointing Authority's decision of 16 November 2004 rejecting the applicant's appeal lodged on 4 October 2004. | (b) | the award, in the 2004 promotion exercise, of points awarded on appeal for reasons other than a finding of merit in that period, priority points for work in the interest of the institution and transitional priority points; | (c) | as regards the points in (b), the merit list of officials in Grade A5 for promotion exercise 2004, published in Administrative Notices No 114-2004 of 20 September 2004 and No 119-2004 of 27 September 2004, and the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 under the 2004 promotion exercise, published in Administrative Notice No 130-2004 of 30 November 2004; and the decision not to enter the applicant on those lists; |
| --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| (a) | the decision of the Director General of the Legal Service not to award him, for the 2004 promotion exercise, priority points under Article 5(2)(a) of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, as is apparent from the Sysper 2 computerised system, confirmed by the Appointing Authority's decision of 16 November 2004 rejecting the applicant's appeal lodged on 4 October 2004. | | | | | | |
| (b) | the award, in the 2004 promotion exercise, of points awarded on appeal for reasons other than a finding of merit in that period, priority points for work in the interest of the institution and transitional priority points; | | | | | | |
| (c) | as regards the points in (b), the merit list of officials in Grade A5 for promotion exercise 2004, published in Administrative Notices No 114-2004 of 20 September 2004 and No 119-2004 of 27 September 2004, and the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 under the 2004 promotion exercise, published in Administrative Notice No 130-2004 of 30 November 2004; and the decision not to enter the applicant on those lists; | | | | | | |

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| - | ------------------------------------- |

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant advances similar pleas to those advanced in Case T-385/04( 1 ).

---

( 1 )  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004, p. 27.

---