alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3554

___________ David Williams, *
* Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Anthony Bradley, Correctional Officer, * Jefferson County Jail/Corr ectional * [UNPUBLISHED] Facility, ADC; Ronald Bailey, Lt., * Maximum Security Unit, ADC; * Tommy James, Assistant Warden, * Maximum Security Unit, ADC; Greg * Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Marvin Evans, * Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC; Ray * Hobbs, Chief Deputy Director, ADC; * Max Mobley, Director of * Health/Treatment, ADC; Robert Clark, * ADC; James Gibson, Disciplinary * Hearing Administrator, ADC; Keith * Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, * ADC; Larry Norris, Director, ADC; * Sarah Speer, Infirmary Administrator, * ADC; Rick Toney, Warden, Varner * Unit, ADC; Tim Moncrief, Warden, * Varner Unit, ADC, *
* Appellees. *1 The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2- ___________ Submitted: November 13, 2009 Filed: November 18, 2009

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Inmate David Williams appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district c ourt properly granted summary judgment in this matter. See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs.,Inc. , 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); see also Reed v. Lear Corp. , 556 F.3d 674, 678 (8th Cir. 2009) (to defeat summary judgment, plaintiff must substantiate allegations with sufficient probative evidence permitting finding in his favor). We also find that the district court properly limited its consideration to those claims that Williams raised in his third amended complaint, which he file d through appointed counsel. SeeIn re Wireless Tel. Fed. Cost Recovery Fees Litig. , 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Orris L. Cousins *vs.*James L. Entwistle

Washington.

Opinion, October 1, 1958.

*Elbridge B. Davis,*for plaintiff.

*Garth J. Sprague,*for defendant.

Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, Siddall, JJ.

Per curiam.

This was a suit to collect unpaid wages claimed by the plaintiff for services as guide and as caretaker of the defendant’s private hunting and fishing lodge. The issues were factual and of the type appropriately left to a jury. If there are issues of law, they have escaped the attention of both counsel and the court. The record discloses credible evidence of a contract, performed by the plaintiff and broken by the defendant. A Washington County jury has announced by its verdict that the plaintiff should be paid. So be it!

*Motion for new trial overruled.*
1 

MEMORANDUM 

From: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044) 

Date: March, 2011 

Subject: Incorporation by Reference of Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 – “National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric 

Utility Steam Generating Units” 

This docket contains information that is relevant to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044 entitled, 

“Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, 

and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units.” Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR2009-0234 is incorporated by reference into Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1837 Prepped byKeeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 167 ) IV-C-

7 Docket Number: 

# A-84-3 3

Printed 11/14/20083:48:11 PM Sheet 167 of 238P. 2



## I 1 

## ' £% \ | ^f^Z , | UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y \__< ^ WASHINGTON . D.C . 20460 

### JU N 

### 2 9 198

7

TH E ADMINISTRATO R



# Ktciooiyy

Honorabl e Donal dPau l Hode l Secretar yo f th e Interio r Washington , D.C . 2024 0 Dea r Secretar yHodel : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Ma y28 , 1987 , lette r reiteratin g th e views ^ andconcern s o f th e Departmen t o f th e Interio r (DOI ) regardin g th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA ) pendin g rulemakin g wit hrespec t t o surfac e coa l mine s an d ai r qualit yne wsourc e review . A s yo u state di n you r letter , EP Ai s currentl yi n th e proces s o f evaluatin g variou s option s fo r fina l rulemakin g regardin g th e contro l o f surfac e mines . W e ar e acutel yawar e o f th e controversie s and comple x issue s whic hsurroun dth e rulemakin g decision . Th e potentia l significan t environmental , energy , and economi c impact s o f an yEP Adecisio no n th e rulemakin g hav e mad e u s extremel ysensitiv e t o th e view s o f al l affecte d parties . Accordingly , w e recogniz e an d appreciat e th e valuabl e inpu t int o th e regulator yproces s tha t th e DO I ha s provided . Th e concern s and issue s tha t yo u hav e raise dar e bein g give ncarefu l consideration . Afina l EP Adecisio nwil l b e mad e onl yafte r a thoroug hrevie wo f al l th e informatio nan d comment s submitted . I expec t t o b e considerin g th e issu e i n mid-July . I n respons e t o you r request , I woul db e please dt o spea k wit hyo u o n th e subjec t a t tha t time . SififTferely ,
Le e M . Thoma s

bcc : Barbar a Brow

n Docke t retype d6/16/87-Jj c 0AQPS-CPDD:DSo1omon:pbfinch:RTP(MD-15):629-5375:6-12-8 7 Contro l Number : A

X70094 4 Du e OAR : 6-24-8 7 Dis kNumber : Solomo n6/ 1
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Economic Sanctions Programs

# 						Economic Sanctions Programs					

							The Office of Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation (EB/TFS/SPI) is responsible for developing and implementing foreign policy-related sanctions adopted to counter threats to national security posed by particular activities and countries. SPI builds international support for implementation of economic sanctions, provides foreign policy guidance to the Department of Treasury and Commerce on sanctions implementation, and works with Congress to draft legislation that advances U.S. foreign policy goals in these areas. SPI maintains and enforces sanctions to maximize their economic impact on our targets and minimize the damage to U.S. economic interests. We also work to remove economic sanctions when appropriate to reward and incentivize improved behavior or demonstrate U.S. support for newly established democratic governments. In addition, SPI conducts outreach on sanctions issues to a wide range of interested parties including NGOs, companies, diaspora groups, and others.						

		Subscribe		

21 items

          -    		Nicaragua Sanctions	   
          -    		Somalia Sanctions	   
          -    		South Sudan Sanctions	   
          -    		Sudan Sanctions	   
          -    		Syria Sanctions	   
          -    		Ukraine and Russia Sanctions	   
          -    		Venezuela-Related Sanctions	   
          -    		Western Balkans Sanctions	   
          -    		West Bank Sanctions	   
          -    		Zimbabwe Sanctions	   

previous page123next page

Back to Top
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-4/05 SA: Alt Ylmy – Ömümcilik Paydarlar Jemgyyeti v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)

(2006/C 10/14)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-4/05 SA: application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities brought on 9 March 2005 by Alt Ylmy — Ömümcilik Paydarlar Jemgyyeti, established in Ashgabat (Turkmenistan) (lawyer: R. Nathan) against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J-F. Pasquier and E. Manhaeve) — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

----

(1)OJ C 106 of 30.04.2005

----
#### § 423.661 Witnesses lists and documents.

Witness lists and documents must be identified and exchanged at least 5 calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing

[75 FR 19824, Apr. 15, 2010]
#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Archie PERRY.

No. 66878.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Archie Perry, applying for writ of review. Parish of East Baton- Rouge. City Court, T-69323.

Writ denied.

DIXON, C. J.,

dissents. This defendant is entitled by law to an appeal on the record. He did not get it. Half the record was not transcribed. He is entitled to a new trial.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
§ 412.204 Payment to hospitals located in Puerto Rico. ( a ) *FY 1988 through FY 1997.* For discharges occurring on or after October 1, 1987 and before October 1, 1997, payments for inpatient operating costs to hospitals located in Puerto Rico that are paid under the prospective payment system are equal to the sum of— ( 1 ) 75 percent of the Puerto Rico prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.208 or § 412.210; and
( 2 ) 25 percent of a national prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.212.
( b ) *FY 1998 through March 31, 2004.* For discharges occurring on or after October 1, 1997 and before April 1, 2004, payments for inpatient operating costs to hospitals located in Puerto Rico that are paid under the prospective payment system are equal to the sum of— ( 1 ) 50 percent of the Puerto Rico prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.208 or § 412.210; and
( 2 ) 50 percent of a national prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.212.
( c ) *Period of April 1, 2004 through September 31, 2004.* For discharges occurring on or after April 1, 2004 and before October 1, 2004, payment for inpatient operating costs to hospitals located in Puerto Rico that are paid under the prospective payment system are equal to the sum of— ( 1 ) 37.5 percent of the Puerto Rico prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.208 or § 412.210; and
( 2 ) 62.5 percent of the national prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.212.
( d ) *FY 2005 through December 31, 2015.* For discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2004 and before January 1, 2016, payments for inpatient operating costs to hospitals located in Puerto Rico that are paid under the prospective payment system are equal to the sum of— ( 1 ) 25 percent of the Puerto Rico prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.208 or § 412.211; and
( 2 ) 75 percent of a national prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.212.
( e ) *January 1, 2016 and thereafter.* For discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2016, payments for inpatient operating costs to hospitals located in Puerto Rico that are paid under the prospective payment system are equal to 100 percent of a national prospective payment rate for inpatient operating costs, as determined under § 412.212.
[62 FR 46030, Aug. 29, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 49247, Aug. 11, 2004; 81 FR 57268, Aug. 22, 2016]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4185 — CVCI/Amber Trust II/AB Sanitas)

(2006/C 151/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
# C_2006074EN.01001702.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/17

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2006 — Medici Grimm v Council

(Case T-364/03) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of leather handbags originating in the People's Republic of China - Amendment of a regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - No retroactive effect - Annulment by the Court of First Instance - Action for damages - Sufficiently serious breach)

(2006/C 74/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Medici Grimm KG (Rodgau Hainhausen, Germany) (represented by: R. MacLean, Solicitor, and E. Gybels, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Khan and T. Scharf, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

(

Application for

compensation under Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the absence of retroactive effect of Council Regulation (EC) No 2380/98 of 3 November 1998, amending Regulation (EC) No 1567/97 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of leather handbags originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 1997 L 296, p. 1), partially annulled by the judgment in Case T-7/99 Medici Grimm v Council [2000] ECR II-2671

Medici Grimm

Council

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | The applicant shall bear, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council;

| 3. | The Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 24.1.2004.

1

---
§ 417.470 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements those portions of section 1857(e)(2) of the Act pertaining to cost sharing in enrollment-related costs and section 1876(c), (g), (h), and (i) of the Act that pertain to the contract between CMS and an HMO or CMP for participation in the Medicare program.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth— ( 1 ) Specific contract requirements; and
( 2 ) Procedures for renewal, nonrenewal, or termination of a contract.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38079, July 15, 1993; 62 FR 63673, Dec. 2, 1997]
§ 415.164 Payment to a fund. ( a ) *General rules.* Payment for certain voluntary services by physicians in teaching hospitals (as these services are described in § 415.160) is made on a salary equivalent basis (as described in § 415.162(d)) subject to the conditions and limitations contained in parts 405 and 413 of this chapter and this part 415, to a single fund (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section) designated by the organized medical staff of the hospital (or, if the services are furnished in the hospital by the faculty of a medical school, to a fund as may be designated by the faculty), if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The hospital (or medical school furnishing the services under arrangement with the hospital) incurs no actual cost in furnishing the services.
( 2 ) The hospital has an agreement with CMS under part 489 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The intermediary, or CMS as appropriate, has received written assurances that— ( i ) The payment is used solely for the improvement of care of hospital patients or for educational or charitable purposes; and
( ii ) Neither the individuals who are furnished the services nor any other persons are charged for the services (and if charged, provision is made for the return of any monies incorrectly collected).
( b ) *Definition of a fund.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, a *fund* is an organization that meets either of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The organization has and retains exemption, as a governmental entity or under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (nonprofit educational, charitable, and similar organizations), from Federal taxation.
( 2 ) The organization is an organization of physicians who, under the terms of their employment by an entity that meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, are required to turn over to that entity all income that the physician organization derives from the physician services.
( c ) *Status of a fund.* A fund approved for payment under paragraph (a) of this section has all the rights and responsibilities of a provider under Medicare except that it does not enter into an agreement with CMS under part 489 of this chapter.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1014

________________________________________________________________________

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Article 98

Agreement between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and BURKINA FASO

Agreement Signed at Ouagadougou

 October 2 and 5, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
BURKINA FASO

International Criminal Court: Article 98

Agreement signed at Ouagadougou October 2 and 5, 2003; 

 Entered into force October 14, 2003.
#### § 137.338 Must funds from other sources be incorporated into a construction project agreement?

Yes, at the request of the Self-Governance Tribe, the Secretary must include funds from other agencies as permitted by law, whether on an ongoing or a one-time basis.
HomeUnder Secretary for ManagementRemarks & Releases...Guidance on Operations During a Lapse in Appropriations

# 									Guidance on Operations During a Lapse in Appropriations							

Other Release

Under Secretary for Management

March 8, 2022

Download Guidance						 [645 KB]

Tags

Bureau of Global Talent ManagementManagement PolicyState Department At WorkUnder Secretary for Management

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ray D. SMITH, Respondent.

No. 44519.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 29, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1974.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Robert E. Pyle, Lake Alfred, for respondent.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This cause is before us on certiorari granted to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Smith v. State reported at 282 So.2d 179 (Fla.App.1973) which directly conflicts with our recent decision in State v. Bryan, 287 So.2d 73 (Fla.1973). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973), F.S. A.

On the authority of State v. Bryan, supra, which controls sub judice, the decision of the District Court is quashed, and, it appearing from the record before us that there may have been undisposed of questions at the level of the District Court which, therefore, did not reach here for review, the cause is remanded for further consideration and proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         179,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,482
<INVENTORY>                                     94,903
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,087
<PP&E>                                         192,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,173
<BONDS>                                          9,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     405,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,925
<SALES>                                        331,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               434,220
<CGS>                                          103,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
# Sudan

238 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs in South Sudan Responding to the Ongoing Sudan Crisis	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Assistant Secretary of State, Julieta Valls Noyes	  Julieta Valls NoyesMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Special Envoy for Sudan Tom Perriello	  March 21, 2024London Hub 
        -    Press Statement  		United States to Provide Additional Humanitarian Assistance to Sudanese People and Host Communities	  Matthew MillerMarch 20, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for Sudan Perriello Travels to Uganda, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Kenya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Khartoum, Sudan: Khartoum American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcement of a Special Envoy for Sudan	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 26, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Condemning the Obstruction of Humanitarian Assistance and Closing of Civic Space in Sudan	  Matthew MillerFebruary 23, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Phee Engages on Sudan in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia	  February 21, 2024 

123…24next page

Back to Top