##### Table of Contents





U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 10-K







|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission file number 0-11480





BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 41-1412084                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

324 S. Hyde Park Ave, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33606

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number: (813) 864-2554





Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $.01 par value

(Title of class)





Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.    Yes  x    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).    Yes   ̈    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                        |  |   |  |                           |  |  
|----------------------- |  | - |  | ------------------------- |  | -
|Large accelerated filer |  |  ̈ |  | Accelerated filer         |  |  ̈
|                        |  |   | 
|Non-Accelerated filer   |  |  ̈ |  | Smaller reporting company |  | x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.):    Yes   ̈    No  x

As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the
last sale price of such stock as of such date on the Pink Sheets, was approximately $2,932,000.

As of June 30, 2010, there were
97,549,783 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.









---

##### Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K that are not strictly historical in nature are forward-looking statements. These statements may include, but
are not limited to, statements about: the timing of the commencement, enrollment, and completion of our clinical trials for our product candidates; the progress or success of our product development programs; the status of regulatory approvals for
our product candidates; the timing of product launches; our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others; and our estimates for future performance,
anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements, and our needs for additional financing. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as anticipates, believes,
could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential, predicts, projects, should, will, would,
goal, or other variations of these terms (including their use in the negative) or by discussions of strategies, plans or intentions. These statements are only predictions based on current information and expectations and involve a number
of risks and uncertainties. The underlying information and expectations are likely to change over time. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to various factors, including, but not
limited to, those set forth under the caption Risk Factors in ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS in this annual report on Form 10-K and those set forth in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required
by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I.



|ITEM 1. | BUSINESS
|------- | --------

In this annual report on Form
10-K, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to Biovest, the Company, our company, we, us, and similar references refer to Biovest International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All
references to years in this Form 10-K, unless otherwise noted, refer to our fiscal years, which end on September 30. For example, a reference to 2009 or fiscal 2009 means the 12-month period ended September 30,
2009.

Overview

As a result of our collaboration with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), we are developing
BiovaxID® as a personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine for the treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphoma,
specifically follicular lymphoma (FL) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and potentially other B-cell blood cancers. Both FL and MCL are generally considered to be incurable with currently approved therapies. These generally fatal diseases arise from the
lymphoid tissue and are characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation and spread throughout the body of mature B-cells, which are a type of white blood cell.

Three clinical trials conducted under our Investigational New Drug Application (IND) have studied BiovaxID in non-Hodgkins lymphoma. These studies
include a Phase 2 clinical trial and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with FL, as well as, a Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL patients. We believe that these clinical trials have demonstrated that BiovaxID, which is personalized and autologous
(derived from a patients own tumor cells), has an excellent safety profile and is effective in the treatment of these lethal diseases. We are currently preparing for discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
international agencies regarding regulatory approvals of BiovaxID for FL and MCL based on these clinical trials. We expect that BiovaxID may also have application in other forms of B-cell lymphoma.

To support our planned commercialization of BiovaxID, we developed an automated cell culture instrument called AutovaxID. We believe that AutovaxID
has significant potential application in the production of a broad range of patient-specific medicines, such as BiovaxID as well as other monoclonal antibodies. We are under contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to further develop AutovaxID
and to explore potential production of additional vaccines, including vaccines for viral indications such as influenza. AutovaxID is automated and computer controlled to improve cell production reliability and to maximize cell production. AutovaxID
uses a disposable production unit which minimizes the need for FDA required clean rooms in the production process and provides for robust and dependable manufacturing while complying with the industry cGMP standards. AutovaxID has a
small footprint and supports scalable production.

We also manufacture instruments and disposables used in the hollow-fiber production of cell
culture products. Our hollow-fiber cell culture products and instruments are used by biopharmaceutical and biotech companies, medical schools, universities, research facilities, hospitals and public and private laboratories. We also produce
mammalian and insect cells, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant and secreted proteins and other cell culture products using our unique capability, expertise and proprietary advancements in the cell production process known as hollow fiber perfusion.

Our business consists of three primary business segments: development of BiovaxID and potentially other B-cell blood cancer vaccines; the
manufacture and sale of AutovaxID and other instruments and consumables; and commercial production of cell culture products and services.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

Products

Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine 
BiovaxID®

The Human Immune System

The
immune system functions as the bodys natural defense mechanism for identifying and killing or eliminating disease-causing pathogens (such as bacteria, viruses, or other foreign microorganisms) and tumor cells. In humans, the primary disease
fighting function of the immune system is carried out by white blood cells (leukocytes), which mediate two types of immune responses: innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity refers to the broad first-line immune defense that
recognizes and eliminates certain pathogens prior to the initiation of a more specific adaptive immune response. While the cells of the innate immune system provide a first line of defense, they cannot always eliminate or recognize infectious
organisms. In some cases, new infections may not always be recognized or detected by the innate immune system. In these cases, the adaptive immune response has evolved to provide a highly-specific and versatile means of defense which also provides
long-lasting protection (immune memory) against subsequent re-infection by the same pathogen. This adaptive immune response facilitates the use of preventative vaccines that protect against viral and bacterial infections such as measles, polio,
diphtheria, and tetanus.

Adaptive immunity is mediated by a subset of white blood cells called lymphocytes, which are
divided into two types: B-cells and T-cells. In the bloodstream, B-cells and T-cells recognize antigens, which are molecules that are capable of triggering a response in the immune system. Antigens are molecules from bacterial, viral, or fungal
origin, foreign (non-self) proteins, and in some cases, tumor-derived proteins that can stimulate an immune response. The human body makes millions of different types of B-cells that circulate in the blood and lymphatic systems and perform immune
surveillance. Each B-cell has a unique receptor protein (immunoglobulin) on its surface that binds to one particular antigen. Once a B-cell recognizes its specific antigen and receives additional signals from a T-helper cell, it can proliferate and
become activated in order to secrete antibodies (immunoglobulins; Ig) which can neutralize the antigen and target it for destruction. T-cells may also recognize antigens on foreign cells, whereby they can promote the activation of other white blood
cells or initiate destruction of the targeted cells directly. A persons B-cells and T-cells can collectively recognize a wide variety of antigens, but each individual B-cell or T-cell will recognize only one specific antigen. Consequently, in
each persons bloodstream, only a relatively few lymphocytes will recognize the same antigen.

Since B-cell cancers such
as non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) are tumors arising from a single malignant transformed B-cell, the tumor cells in NHL maintain on their surface the original malignant B-cells immunoglobulin (collectively referred to as, the tumor
idiotype) that are distinct from those found on normal B cells. The idiotype of a B-cell lymphoma can therefore serve as a tumor-specific antigen for therapeutic cancer vaccine development.

In many cases, including in NHL, cancer cells produce molecules known as tumor-associated antigens, which may or may not be present in normal cells but
may be over-produced in cancer cells. T-cells and B-cells have receptors on their surfaces that enable them to recognize the tumor associated antigens. While cancer cells may naturally trigger a B- or T-cell-based immune response during the initial
appearance of the disease, this response may be only weakly specific or attenuated in such a way that it does not fully eradicate all tumor cells. Subsequently, tumor cells gradually evolve and escape from this weak immune response and are able to
grow into larger tumors. In addition, because cancer cells arise from normal tissue cells, they are often able to exploit or increase existing immune tolerance mechanisms to suppress the bodys immune response which would normally destroy them.
In other cases, chemotherapy or other treatment regimens used to treat the cancer may themselves weaken the immune response and render it unable to reject and kill tumor cells. Even with an activated immune system; however, the number and size of
tumors can often overwhelm the immune system.

In the case of cancer and other diseases, immunotherapies are designed to activate a
persons immune system in an attempt to combat the disease. There are two forms of immunotherapy used to treat diseases: passive and active. Passive immunotherapy is exemplified by the intravenous infusion into a patient of antibodies specific
to the particular antigen. While passive immunotherapies have shown clinical benefits in some cancers, they require repeated infusions and can cause the destruction of normal cells in addition to cancer cells. An active immunotherapy, on the other
hand, generates an adaptive immune response by introducing an antigen into a patient, often in combination with other components that can enhance an immune response to the antigen. Although active immunotherapeutics have been successful in
preventing many infectious diseases, their ability to combat cancers of various types has been limited by a variety of factors, including the inability of tumor antigens to elicit an effective immune response, difficulty in identifying suitable
target tumor antigens, inability to manufacture tumor antigens in sufficiently pure form, and inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of tumor antigens.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

Nevertheless, in 2010 one active immunotherapy,
Provenge® developed by Dendreon Corporation, received marketing approval from the FDA. This represents the first
case of an active immunotherapy to successfully gain marketing approval in the US. In addition to BiovaxID, there are a number of other active immunotherapeutics for cancer in various stages of clinical trials that have demonstrated promising
results.

A number of features of the non-Hodgkins lymphomas make these tumors particularly suitable treatment with a therapeutic cancer
vaccine. The malignant B-cell lymphocytes of NHL express a unique, identifiable tumor-specific antigen which is not expressed by other (healthy) cells in the body. In contrast, the majority of human cancers typically lack strong ubiquitous
expression of tumor-specific antigens to distinguish them from normal cells, or they express a potentially widely-varying mix of antigens which can be difficult to identify and formulate into a successful therapeutic vaccine.

Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL)

NHL is a heterogeneous group of malignancies of the lymphatic system with differing clinical behaviours and responses to treatment. BiovaxID has been
studied in two distinct forms of non-Hodgkins lymphoma, namely, FL and MCL. NHL is the fifth most common type of cancer in the U.S., with an estimated prevalence of 438,325 cases in 2007 in the U.S. NHL accounts for 5% of all cancer
deaths in the U.S. NHL is one of the few malignancies in which there continues to be a rise in incidence. Since the early 1970s, incidence rates for NHL have nearly doubled. Moreover, in spite of recent advances in the standard of care,
the overall five-year survival rate remains at approximately 63%. According to the NCI, in 2009 it is estimated that 65,980 new cases of NHL will be diagnosed and 19,500 Americans will die from the disease, with a comparable number
estimated in Europe.

NHL is usually classified for clinical purposes as being either indolent or aggressive,
depending on how quickly the cancer cells are likely to grow and spread. The indolent, or slow-growing, form of NHL has a very slow growth rate and may need little or no treatment for months or possibly years. Aggressive, or fast-growing, NHL tends
to grow and spread quickly and cause severe symptoms, and patients with aggressive NHL have shorter overall survival.

Follicular Lymphoma

Indolent (slow growing) and aggressive NHL each constitute approximately half of all newly diagnosed B-cell NHL, and roughly half of the
indolent B-cell NHL is FL. Accordingly, approximately 22% of new cases of NHL fall into the category of disease known as indolent FL. The U.S. prevalence (number of cases) for FL is estimated to be 100,603 cases in 2006. We have conducted a
Phase 2 clinical trial followed by a Phase 3 clinical trial in FL under our IND. FL is a form of NHL that is derived from a type of cell known as a follicle center cell. Despite its slow progression, FL is almost invariably fatal. The median
survival reported for FL patients ranges between 8 and 10 years, although these figures may have become slightly higher within the last decade as a result of the introduction and widespread use of rituximab, which is a monoclonal antibody (a protein
can targets and binds to a specific target protein; in rituximabs case this target is a B-cell protein called CD20).

The current
standard of care for the first-line treatment of FL consists of rituximab-containing chemotherapies and increasingly, long-term use of rituximab following chemotherapy (known as rituximab maintenance therapy). Recently, a Phase 3 clinical trial (the
GELA-sponsored PRIMA study reported at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology) investigating the use of two years of rituximab maintenance therapy in FL patients responding to first line immunochemotherapy has
demonstrated that rituximab maintenance therapy improves progression-free survival (the time elapsed between assessment of treatment effect and tumor progression or death) in treated patients. Over time, a significant number of patients develop
tumors which become refractory (resistant or unresponsive) to rituximab therapy and with prolonged use of rituximab (as is the case with maintenance therapy), we believe that a substantial fraction of treated patients may develop tumor resistance to
rituximab or rituximab-like agents. Notwithstanding treatment with the standard of care including rituximab maintenance therapy, most FL patients eventually relapse and their lymphoma will return. In spite of additional therapies or autologous stem
cell transplants, many FL patients will die of their lymphoma. Accordingly, many patients with FL will likely require treatment options, in addition to rituximab based immunotherapy rituximab maintenance therapy, and/or other CD20-targeting
therapies like radioimmunotherapy.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

The Boxed Warnings Section included in the FDAs Official Product Label for rituximab cites numerous
complications to be considered in the use of the agent. These include: fatal infusion reactions, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) with associated acute renal failure, severe mucocutaneous reactions and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The
Product Label provides additional warnings and precautions including hepatitis B virus (HBV), reactivation infections, cardiovascular events, renal toxicity and bowel obstruction and perforation. In light of the risks raised by the existing reports,
we believe that the indefinite use of rituximab maintenance therapy to treat patients beyond the two-year maintenance regimen is likely to be the subject of additional study.

We are developing BiovaxID to offer patients a therapy which is complementary to the current standard of care (including rituximab
maintenance therapy) and which has a completely different mode of action than rituximab and other anti-CD20 therapies such as the radioimmunotherapies tositumomab
(Bexxar®) or ibritumomab tiuxetan
(Zevalin®). Rituximab targets a cell-surface protein found on virtually all B-cells (i.e., healthy and
cancerous), called CD20. Thus rituximab as an anti-CD20 therapy seeks to destroy both cancerous cells and healthy cells. In contrast, BiovaxID is not an anti-CD20 therapy because BiovaxIDs mode of action does not target or rely upon the CD20
protein, thus making BiovaxID a new therapeutic approach. Specifically, BiovaxID targets the idiotype protein, which is a tumor-specific antigen present only on the surface of cancerous B-cells and not on the surface of healthy B-cells. We,
therefore expect that resistance mechanisms affecting rituximab and anti-CD20 agents, which are largely related to alterations in CD20 expression, will not affect BiovaxID, which targets an entirely distinct protein on the tumor.

Figure 1

LOGO

Figure 1: BiovaxID targets tumor-specific idiotype, a protein unique to the tumor and not found
on healthy (non-malignant) B-cells. In contrast, current monoclonal antibody-based therapies for NHL, including rituximab
(Rituxan®), tositumomab
(Bexxar®), and ibritumomab tiuxetan
(Zevalin®) target CD20, a cell-surface protein expressed by both tumor and healthy B-cells. As such, through its
unique mode of action, BiovaxID represents a new therapeutic approach to treating FL.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

MCL is a rare, aggressive subtype of NHL characterized by short remissions and rapid progression similar to aggressive lymphomas and successive relapses,
reflecting incurability similar to indolent lymphomas. The median overall survival for MCL has been cited as 3 to 5 years and the disease currently lacks a consensus standard of care. MCL represents approximately 6% of all NHL cases and worldwide
there are approximately 7,800 new cases each year of which approximately one half are in the US.

The majority of MCL patients have
disseminated disease and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis. Patients clinical outcomes from currently available therapies are poor. Although many therapeutic regimens are capable of rendering high initial response rates, these responses are
of short duration (i.e., about 20 months) and the relative survival rates of MCL patients are among the lowest compared to other types of NHL. The prognostic after the first relapse is very poor, with an expected median overall survival of about 1-2
years. No currently available therapeutic regimens are curative.

While several therapeutic regimens are available to treat MCL patients,
there currently exists no consensus standard of care for treatment of first-line relapsed MCL. As such, MCL remains incurable and it is generally considered that additional treatment options are required given this significant unmet medical need.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Currently upon first diagnosis of MCL patients are often evaluated for eligibility for autologous stem cell
transplantation eligibility. Stem cell transplantation, an aggressive treatment protocol consisting of high-dose chemotherapy, immunotherapy and full-body radiation, aims to treat the patients tumor and purge the bone marrow of lymphoma cells.
MCL patients who are eligible for stem cell transplantation received either R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophophamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) immunotherapeutic therapy followed by stem cell transplantation receive immunotherapeutic therapy
followed by stem cell transplantation. In some protocols, the use of a very aggressive chemotherapy regimens such as R-HyperCVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with rituximab plus high dose
methotrexate and cytarabine) with severe toxicities have also been described. Unlike in FL, the addition of rituximab to immunotherapy to treat MCL has not been definitively established to significantly extend progression free survival or provide
overall survival benefits.

MCL patients who are not eligible for stem cell transplantation commonly receive chemo-immunotherapy, however,
overall, conventional chemotherapy regimens do not control the disease over the long-term.

The use of these aggressive chemotherapeutic and
transplant approaches is associated with high rates of treatment discontinuation, non-trivial mortality rates, and high risk of myelodysplastic syndrome. The toxicity associated with these regimens largely limits these options primarily to a select
subset of the MCL patient population (namely the younger and more initially healthy patients who can tolerate high-intensity treatments); even this subset, however, ultimately gains only modest benefits from existing treatment options. Moreover, the
use of these more aggressive regimens appears not to result in superior overall survival as compared to standard therapies.

We are developing
BiovaxID as an additional treatment option for MCL patients. Under our IND, we have conducted a Phase 2 clinical trial studying BiovaxID to treat MCL. Based on the safety data from the three BiovaxID clinical trials conducted in NHL under our IND
combined with data from our Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL, as well as based on the efficacy data from our Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL, we believe that BiovaxID may represent a new treatment option for MCL patients.

Development Status of BiovaxID

Introduction

Preliminary
studies demonstrated that treatment of patients with NHL with an active immunotherapy could allow a patients immune system to produce B-cells and/or T-cells that recognized numerous portions of their tumor antigen and generate clinically
significant immune responses. These studies provided the rationale for large-scale trials of active specific immunotherapy of this disease. These studies have been published in The New England Journal of Medicine(October 1992), Blood (May 1997), and Nature Medicine (October 1999).In the treatment of cancer, residual tumor cells
remaining in the patient after completion of surgery or anti-tumor therapy are often the cause of tumor relapse. These residual tumor cells cannot always be detected by standard imaging techniques but their destruction may be feasible by active
immunotherapy. The use of such vaccines differs from traditional cancer treatment in that the ultimate mechanism of action against the tumor is indirect: the anti-tumor immunity induced by vaccination, rather than the vaccine itself, is ultimately
responsible for treatment benefit.

In 1994, the NCI filed for initiation of an IND for the purpose of conducting clinical
trial(s) investigating the use of BiovaxID in NHL. Under this IND, the NCI began in 1994 a Phase 2 clinical trial in FL; in 1999, the Phase 3 clinical trial in FL; and in 2000 a Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL. The NCI selected our Company to produce
the vaccine for the initial Phase 2 clinical trial in FL. In 2001, we entered into a formal cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) with the NCI which formalized our collaboration with the NCI. The IND filed by the NCI was formally
transferred to us in April 2004, which made our Company the exclusive sponsor of the IND with full rights to complete the NCI-initiated Phase 3 clinical trial in FL and the NCI-initiated Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL, to communicate and negotiate
with the FDA relating to marketing approval for BiovaxID and to conduct other clinical studies in NHL under the IND.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Regulatory

In May 2006, the FDA granted
our Company fast track status (Fast Track) for BiovaxID for the treatment of FL. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA) includes Section 112, Expediting study and approval of fast track
drugs. This section mandates the Agency to facilitate the development and expedite review of drugs and biologics intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.
Fast Track adds to existing programs, such as accelerated approval, the possibility of a rolling submission for a marketing application. An important feature of Fast Track is that it emphasizes the critical nature of close
early communication between the FDA and sponsor to improve the efficiency of product development. Fast Track is a formal mechanism to interact with the FDA using approaches that are available to all applicants for marketing claims. The
benefits of Fast Trackinclude scheduled meetings to seek FDA input into development plans, the option of submitting a New Drug Application in sections rather than all components simultaneously, and the option of requesting evaluation of
studies using surrogate endpoints. The Fast Track status is intended for the combination of a product and a claim that addresses an unmet medical need, but is independent of Priority Review and Accelerated Approval. An applicant may use any
or all of the components of Fast Track without the formal designation. Fast Track status does not necessarily lead to a Priority Review or Accelerated Approval.

In October 2006, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) granted our Company Orphan Medicinal Product designation for BiovaxID for the treatment of FL. This
designation is intended to promote the development of products that may offer therapeutic benefits for diseases affecting less than five in 10,000 people in the European Union (EU). The Commission of the European Union entered BiovaxID into the
European Communitys Drug Register for Rare Diseases. This acceptance by the Commission followed the previous recommendation by the Committee on Orphan Medical Products (COMP) of the EMEA that BiovaxID be granted designation as a treatment for
a rare disease. The EMEAs orphan medicinal product designations are based on several criteria that include the rarity and seriousness of the condition, and the availability of other effective therapies. In addition, it is required that an
orphan drug product treats disorders inflicting fewer than five in 10,000 people. Orphan Medicinal Product designation provides opportunities for free protocol assistance, fee reductions for access to the centralized community procedures before
and after marketing authorization, and 10 years of market exclusivity following drug approval.

In October 2009, the FDA granted our Company
Orphan Drug designation for BiovaxID for the treatment of FL. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant Orphan Drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which generally is a disease or condition that
affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. After the FDA grants Orphan Drug designation to a product, the generic identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are publicly disclosed by the FDA. Orphan Drug
designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. If a product which has an Orphan Drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the indication for which it has
such designation, the product is entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances such as
greater effectiveness, greater safety, major contribution to patient care, or inadequate supply.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial

In 1994, a Phase 2 clinical trial was commenced by the NCI to evaluate the ability of BiovaxID to eradicate residual lymphoma cells in 20 patients
with FL who were in chemotherapy-induced first clinical complete remission. All 11 patients with a detectable lymphoma gene sequence (translocation) in their primary tumors had cells from the malignant clone detectable in their blood by DNA
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy, despite being in complete remission. In this clinical trial, molecular remission was defined as patients lacking any detectable residual cancer cells bearing the
translocation as determined by a very sensitive PCR technique. After vaccination, 8 of 11 patients converted to lacking cells in their blood from the malignant lymphoma clone detectable by PCR. Anti-tumor T-cell responses were found in the vast
majority of the patients (19 of 20 patients), whereas anti-tumor antibodies were detected, but apparently were not required for molecular remission. Vaccination was thus associated with clearance of residual tumor cells from the blood and long-term
disease-free survival. The demonstration of molecular remissions and uniform, specific T-cell responses against lymphoma tumor targets, as well as the addition of granulocytemonocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to the vaccine
formulation provided the rationale for the initiation of a larger Phase 3 clinical trial at the NCI in 2000. These results were published in Nature Medicine(October 1999).



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Phase 3 Clinical Trial (BV301) of BiovaxID for Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

Overview and Objectives

In January 2000,
a Phase 3 multi-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial (BV301) modeled on the NCI Phase 2 clinical trial was initiated by the NCI. As was the NCI Phase 2 clinical trial, in the Phase 3 clinical trial BiovaxID consisted of
patient-specific idiotype protein (Id) conjugated or combined with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH immunogenic carrier protein) and administered with granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (which is known as GM-CSF and which is a biological
response modifier).

The primary objectives of the Phase 3 clinical trial were to confirm the safety and efficacy of BiovaxID in two
predefined groups:



| | (1) | All Randomized Patients: all randomized patients (the Randomized Patients) including patients who completed initial chemotherapy but relapsed and did not
receive either BiovaxID or Control.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | All Treated Patients: the Randomized Patients who were disease-free at the time of vaccination and consequently received at least one dose of BiovaxID or control.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The secondary objectives of the Phase 3 clinical trial included: (1) to determine the ability of BiovaxID to produce a
molecular complete response in subjects in clinical complete response, but with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evidence of residual disease after standard chemotherapy; (2) to determine the impact of BiovaxID on molecular remission in FL
patients; (3) to evaluate the ability of BiovaxID to generate an immune response against autologous tumor; (4) to determine and compare the overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to receive either treatment assignment; and
(5) to evaluate the safety of BiovaxID administered with GM-CSF.

Biopsy, Chemotherapy, and Immune Recovery

Prior to chemotherapy initiation, an excisional lymph node biopsy was performed to obtain tissue for tumor classification and characterization, and to
provide starting material for BiovaxID production. Following this biopsy patients were initially treated with PACE chemotherapy (a combination of prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) in order to induce a complete response (CR) or a
complete response unconfirmed (CRu) as measured by CT radiological scans.

The trial protocol stipulated that for all patients, an Immune
Recovery Period of approximately 6 months following completion of chemotherapy was required to be completed without relapse before vaccination. The Immune Recovery Period was required in order to maximize the potential for immune response to vaccine
and to avoid confounding factors from any potential lingering immunosuppressive effects of chemotherapy.

Randomization to Immune Recovery
Followed By BiovaxID or Control

When the NCI designed the Phase 3 clinical trial protocol, a decision was made to randomize patients
immediately after completion of chemotherapy and to not wait for the completion of the Immune Recovery Period in an effort to avoid expending NCI resources to manufacture patient-specific vaccines for patients who were not anticipated to receive the
vaccine (e.g., control patients). In the Phase 3 clinical trial, of 234 patients initially enrolled into the clinical trial, 177 patients completed chemotherapy successfully and were randomized.

As per the design of the study, patients who relapsed during the Immune Recovery Period were excluded from treatment with BiovaxID or Control
notwithstanding the fact that they had been randomized. In the clinical trial, of the 177 initially randomized patients, 117 remained eligible to be treated with either BiovaxID (76 patients) or control (41 patients) at the end of the Immune
Recovery Period. Sixty patients of the 177 randomized patients relapsed during the Immune Recovery Period and were not treated with either BiovaxID or control (Figure 2).



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Figure 2

LOGO

Figure 2: Flow Diagram of Phase 3, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of patient-specific vaccination with
BiovaxID + GM-CSF in first complete remission. 234 patients were enrolled at 14 centers and assessed for eligibility. Of those enrolled, 57 were excluded from randomization for reasons indicated. 177 patients were randomized (ITT population), of
which 118 were allocated to the BiovaxID (Id-KLH + GM-CSF) arm (treatment) and 59 were allocated to the KLH + GM-CSF arm (control). Patients that failed to remain in CR/CRu (60 total) did not receive either vaccine. As a result, 76 patients were
vaccinated with Id-KLH + GM-CSF and 41 were vaccinated with KLH + GM-CSF, comprising the modified ITT (mITT) population. Patients receiving less than 5 immunizations either withdrew from the study or relapsed before completion.

Trial Enrollment and The Use of Rituximab-Containing Induction Chemotherapy

During the course of the Phase 3 clinical trial, the standard of care for induction chemotherapy in FL changed to include rituximab, which reduced our
ability to recruit and enroll patients into the study. In order to facilitate enrollment in the clinical trial, we amended the study protocol in 2007 to permit the use of a rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen (CHOP-R), as induction therapy.
Before patients receiving CHOP-R could be treated with BiovaxID or control, and due to the protracted enrollment, the clinical trials Independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC; a committee responsible for reviewing the available unblinded
clinical trial data in the study and responsible for recommendations to the sponsor and the FDA) recommended an interim analysis of the clinical trials endpoints and overall safety profile which resulted in the termination and halting of the
trial in 2008.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

In light of the recommendation of the DMC, and before any patients treated with CHOP-R had been vaccinated
with BiovaxID or control, the FDA requested that we abstain from vaccinating any patients who received CHOP-R. Accordingly, we did not vaccinate any of the patients who received CHOP-R chemotherapy under the clinical trial protocol.

As of April 15, 2008, when the clinical trial was officially closed, a total of 234 subjects had been enrolled and 177 subjects had been
randomized in the Phase 3 clinical trial, which was less than the original clinical trial plan which called for 629 subjects to be enrolled and 540 to be randomized. While the termination of the trial before completion of the planned accrual
resulted in a smaller sample size than was originally intended, we believe that the randomized nature of our trial yields a valid conclusion because its baseline characteristics were well balanced, allocation to treatment arms was concealed, and the
study was double-blinded.

Results

As reported at the plenary session of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2009, Orlando, FL), the patient cohort of the
177 All Randomized patients (which included 117 (66%) Treated Patients and 60 (35%) patients who were not treated) demonstrated no statistically significant difference in median DFS from randomization between treatment and control arms. At
ASCO, we further reported that the 117 Treated Patients who received at least one dose of either BiovaxID or control, which represents a modified intent-to-treat population, demonstrated approximately 13.6 months of prolonged DFS. We further
reported that the Treated Patient analysis satisfies the prospectively defined primary clinical trial objective. Of these 117 Treated Patients, 76 patients received at least one dose of BiovaxID (referred to as the BiovaxID Arm) and 41 patients
received at least one dose of control (referred to as the Control Arm). No serious adverse events were reported in either the BiovaxID Arm or the Control Arm. At the median follow-up of 56.6 mo (range 12.6-89.3 mo), a statistically significant
improvement of 13.6 months was observed in the disease-free survival between patients in the BiovaxID Arm (44.2 mo), versus the Control arm (30.6 mo) (log-rank p-value = 0.045; HR = 1.6). Using a Cox proportional-hazard model, a statistically
significant hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62 was achieved (p=0.048; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99). This means that patients receiving BiovaxID experienced an approximately 61% (1/0.62) lower risk of cancer recurrence compared to patients who received the
control vaccine. The Phase 3 clinical trials secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached for either group due to the length of follow-up to date.

We are currently preparing for discussions with the FDA regarding marketing approval of BiovaxID for the treatment of FL. Biovests
pending reorganization under Chapter 11, which commenced in November 2008, resulted in a delay in Biovests planned meetings with the FDA. Additionally, we wanted to examine patient tissue samples from the Phase 3 clinical trial to determine
and report to the FDA certain secondary endpoints including molecular remission and immune response because molecular and immune response data reported in the Phase 2 clinical trial discussed above was very encouraging (Nature
Medicine October 1999). We have not yet conducted this analysis due primarily to delays related to various internal policies and laws concerning patients confidentiality at the NCI where the patient tissue samples are held.
We believe that these administrative issues have recently been resolved and that the desired analysis will commence shortly. We anticipate conducting such meetings with the FDA in 2010.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

In
2000, the NCI initiated a Phase 2 open-label clinical trial (NCT00020215) of BiovaxID for the treatment of MCL. This Phase 2 clinical trial was based upon the NCIs Phase 2 clinical trial in FL. The primary objective of this Phase 2 clinical
trial was to study BiovaxID in treatment-naïve patients with MCL and to determine the safety and efficacy of BiovaxID following a rituximab-based immunotherapy. Twenty-six patients with untreated, mostly (92%) stage IV MCL, were enrolled.
All patients received six cycles of EPOCH-R (which is an immunotherapy consisting of etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, rituximab); 92% of the patients achieved complete response (CR) and 8% achieved partial response
(PR). All but 3 patients (i.e., due to disease progression or inability to manufacture the vaccine) received BiovaxID together with KLH on day 1, along with GM-CSF (100 μg/m2/day) on days 1-4 at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months starting at least 3
months post-chemotherapy.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

The results of our MCL Phase 2 clinical trial were reported in Nature Medicine (August 2005). As
reported in Nature Medicine, after a median follow-up of 46 months, the OS was 89%, the median event-free survival (EFS) was 22 months, and five patients remained in continuous first CR. Antibody responses to immunization were detected in 30%
of the patients, following a delayed pattern (i.e., detected mostly after the 4-5th vaccination) which paralleled the peripheral blood B-cell recovery. Most importantly, specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were detected in 87% of patients
post-vaccine, and in 7 of 9 patients tested these responses were detected after the 3rd vaccination when peripheral B-cells were by and large undetectable. The detected cytokine release response included GM-CSF, INF-g, and TNF-a (type I). In this
study, BiovaxID induced both humoral and cellular immune responses following almost complete depletion of B-cells following rituximab-containing chemotherapy. The adverse events observed in this trial were minimal and comparable to the toxicities
observed in the FL studies. These were limited mostly to injection site reactions, similar to those reported in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 FL clinical trials. On May 13, 2010, we submitted an application to the FDA seeking Orphan Drug designation
for BiovaxID to treat MCL. We believe that Orphan Drug designation may be granted for BiovaxID to treat MCL because Orphan Drug designations are largely based on the prevalence of the disease and MCL is within the designated prevalence levels. We
are also preparing to submit applications seeking Orphan Drug designation from the EMEA and Fast Track status from the FDA. Once our Orphan Drug application is concluded, we plan to meet with the FDA to discuss the data from the
MCL Phase 2 clinical trial supported by the data from the Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials in FL and the pathway for marketing approval for BiovaxID to treat MCL.

Proprietary Rights to
BiovaxID®

As a result of Orphan Drug designation for the treatment of FL, we have seven years of market exclusivity in the U.S. from the date of FDA marketing
approval. We have ten years of market exclusivity in Europe as a result of Orphan Medicinal Product designation for the treatment of FL by the EMEA.

In addition to market exclusivity based on governmental regulation, we rely on proprietary rights provided by a combination of an exclusive world-wide
license to the cell line that is used in the production of BiovaxID, patent protection, trade secret protection, and our ongoing innovation. Although the composition of matter of the BiovaxID vaccine is not patentable, we have filed an international
patent application (PCT) relating to methods of treatment using our vaccine. In addition, we have filed U.S. and foreign patent applications relating to certain features of the AutovaxID instrument used in the production of the vaccine. Our
proprietary production system will use fully enclosed and disposable components for each patients vaccine. We believe that, without the availability of an automated production system, the methods used to produce a patient-specific
immunotherapy are time-consuming and labor-intensive, resulting in a very expensive process that would be difficult to scale up. We have been granted the registration of the trademark BiovaxID.

BiovaxID is manufactured with a proprietary cell line, which we have licensed on a world-wide exclusive basis from Stanford University (Stanford). This
is significant, because we believe that the use of any cell line other than our exclusively licensed cell line, in the production of a similar idiotype vaccine would require filing a separate IND application and undergoing clinical testing
evaluation by the FDA.

BiovaxID® Manufacturing Process and Facility

Manufacturing Process

The BiovaxID production process begins when a sample of the patients tumor is extracted by a biopsy and the sample is shipped refrigerated to our
facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota. At our facility, we identify the antigen idiotype that is expressed on the surface of the patients tumor cells through laboratory analysis. In NHL, the tumor B-cells bear the surface idiotype (immunoglobulin
or antibody) derived from the original transformed malignant B-cell, but do not typically secrete it in an amount suitable for vaccine production. In order to make sufficient quantities of idiotype for vaccination, the patients tumor cells are
then fused with an exclusively licensed cell line (mouse/human heterohybridoma cell line K6H6) from Stanford to create a hybridoma or hybrid cell.

After the creation of the hybridoma, we determine which hybridoma cells display the same antigen idiotype as the patients tumor cells, and those
cells are selected to produce the vaccine. The selected hybridoma cells are then seeded into our proprietary hollow-fiber bioreactors, where they are cultured and where they secrete or produce idiotype antigen. The secreted idiotype is then
collected from the cells growing in the hollow-fiber reactor. After a sufficient amount of idiotype is collected for the production of an appropriate amount of the vaccine, the patients idiotype is purified using multi-step purification
processes.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Figure 3

LOGO

Figure 3: Individualized Manufacturing Process for BiovaxID immunotherapy: (Clockwise) Beginning with an excisional
(>2cm) lymph node biopsy, tumor cells are fused with our proprietary mouse/human heterohybridoma in order to induce secretion of normally surface-bound tumor immunoglobulin (idiotype). Id-secreting clones are identified by comparing their unique
idiotype sequence to the tumors after which they are cultured (expanded) in a proprietary hollow-fiber bioreactor system (not shown). During culture, supernatant (containing idiotype) is collected until sufficient amounts have been produced to
yield adequate dosage of vaccine. This supernatant is purified by affinity chromatography and conjugated (bonded) to KLH carrier protein, resulting in a finished vaccine that can be shipped and administered to patients. In the Phase 3 clinical
trial, manufacturing success was approximately 95% of treated patients. (Fig. reprinted from Neelapu, et al. Exp. Opin Biol Ther2007).



11



---

##### Table of Contents

We use a method known as hollow-fiber perfusion to produce the cell cultures used in the
manufacture of BiovaxID. Hollow-fiber perfusion, as compared to other cell culture methods, seeks to grow cells to higher densities more closely approaching the density of cells naturally occurring in body tissue. The hollow-fiber perfusion method
involves using hair-like plastic fibers with hollow centers which are intended to simulate human capillaries. Thousands of these fibers are inserted in a cartridge, which we refer to as a bioreactor. The cells are grown on the outside of the hollow
fibers while nutrient media used to support cell growth is delivered through the hollow centers of the fibers. The fiber walls have small pores, allowing nutrients to pass from the hollow center to the cells. The fibers act as filters and yield
concentrated secreted products. Because the cells are immobilized in the bioreactor, the concentrated product can be harvested during the ongoing cell growth process. We believe that hollow-fiber technology permits the harvest of cell culture
products with generally higher purities than stirred-tank fermentation, a common alternative cell culture method, thereby reducing the cost of purification as compared to stirred tank fermentation. Additionally, the technology associated with the
hollow-fiber process generally minimizes the amount of costly nutrient media required for cell growth as opposed to other cell culturing techniques.

After manufacture and purification, the resulting purified idiotype is then conjugated, or joined together, with KLH, to create the vaccine. KLH is a
foreign carrier protein that is used to improve the immunogenicity, or ability to evoke an immune response, of the tumor-specific idiotype. The vaccine is then frozen and shipped to the treating physician. At the treating physicians office,
the vaccine is thawed and injected into the patient.

The vaccine is administered in conjunction with granulocyte macrophage colony-
stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a natural immune system growth factor that is administered with an idiotype to stimulate the immune system and increase the response to the idiotype. In the clinical trials patients were administered five monthly
BiovaxID injections in the amount of 0.5 milligram of idiotype per injection, with the injections being given over a six-month period of time in which the fifth month is skipped. Through this process, the patient-specific idiotype is used to
stimulate the patients immune system into targeting and destroying malignant B-cells bearing the same idiotype.

We estimate that an
average of 3 months is required to manufacture each vaccine which for most patients may over-lap the time period when induction chemotherapy is being administered. While the manufacturing process for the BiovaxID vaccine is highly personalized to
each patient and somewhat complex, we consider it to be highly controlled and predictable. During the Phase 3 clinical trial we experienced an approximately 95% success rate in manufacturing vaccines with the most common reason for a failure to
successfully produce a patients vaccine being attributed to the presence of rare idiotype variants as opposed to the failure of a step in the manufacturing process.

Manufacturing Facility

BiovaxID is a
personalized medicine which is produced separately for each individual patient through a laboratory process based on the patients own tumor cells derived by biopsy. Following regulatory approval of BiovaxID, we plan to produce BiovaxID in our
existing facility located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In order to facilitate the regulatory process, we are preparing a dedicated suite of laboratory clean rooms especially designed to produce BiovaxID. As the regulatory process advances toward
completion, we anticipate expanding our manufacturing facility as required to meet anticipated commercial requirements. During the Phase 3 clinical trial, BiovaxID was produced at our facility in Worcester, Massachusetts. Because we have relocated
the site of the manufacturing process to our Minneapolis facility following the clinical trials and because we are expanding that facility, we are currently in the process of demonstrating to the FDA that the product under these new conditions is
comparable to the product that was the subject of earlier clinical testing. This requirement will also apply to future expansions of the manufacturing facility, such as the possible expansion to additional facilities that may be required for
successful commercialization of the vaccine. There is also a requirement for validation of the manufacturing process for BiovaxID utilizing our AutovaxID instrument. A showing of comparability requires data demonstrating that the product continues
to be safe, pure, and potent and may be based on chemical, physical, and biological assays and, in some cases, other non-clinical data.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Instruments and Disposables

We sell hollow-fiber perfusion instruments used for the production of significant quantities of cell culture products. Our product line includes:

AUTOVAXID

AutovaxID
is a fully automated, reusable instrument that employs a fully disposable, closed-system cell-growth chamber incorporating a hollow-fiber cell-growth cartridge. Since it is fully enclosed, computer controlled and automated, AutovaxID requires
limited supervision and manpower to operate compared to manual instruments. AutovaxID is suitable for growing antibody-secreting cell lines, including hybridomas and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells which are among the leading kinds of cell lines
used for commercial therapeutic protein manufacture. We plan to utilize the AutovaxID technology to streamline commercial manufacture of our proprietary anti-cancer vaccine, BiovaxID. AutovaxID is the first cell culture system that enables
production of personalized cell-based treatments economically and in compliance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs). In September 2009, we entered into a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD) to further develop and modify the AutovaxID instrument including for purposes of applying this technology to applications of potential military interest, including research and production of antiviral vaccines such as those
targeting influenzas.

PRIMER
HF®

The Primer HF is a low cost hollow-fiber cell culture system capable of producing small quantities of monoclonal antibody. This system also provides a
relatively inexpensive option to evaluate the efficacy of new cell lines in perfusion technology.

MINI
MAX®

The miniMax provides the flexibility and technology needed to support optimization studies and research scale production of mammalian cell secreted
proteins. This automated cell culture system is a table-top unit complete with microprocessor controller, self-contained incubator, and pump panel. The miniMax is an economical tool for researching scale-up processes and producing small quantities
of protein of up to 10 grams per month.

MAXIMIZER®

The Maximizer provides maximum flexibility to support optimization studies and pilot scale production of mammalian cell
secreted proteins. This automated cell culture system is a table-top unit complete with validated microprocessor controller, self-contained incubator, and pump panel. With production rates up to one gram a day, the Maximizer is a tool for process
development and production.

XCELLERATOR

The XCellerator is a self-standing floor system containing an incubator and refrigerator section, control fixtures and pump panel. Each Xcellerator
supports two independent flowpaths, is controlled by a process control computer and has the capability of remote monitoring. The combined features of the XCellerator support production of 60-500 grams of protein per month, per XCellerator unit.

In addition to instruments sales, we have recurring revenue from the sale of hollow-fiber bioreactors, cultureware, tubing sets and other
disposable products and supplies for use with our instruments. Revenues from such disposable products represented approximately 45% and 46% of our total revenue from this business segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
respectively.

Currently we assemble, validate and package the instruments and disposables which we sell. Customers for our instruments and
disposables are the same potential customers targeted for our contract production services which include biopharmaceutical and biotech companies, medical schools, universities, research facilities, hospitals and public and private laboratories.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Cell Culture Products and Services

We manufacture mammalian cell culture products such as, whole cells, recombinant and secreted proteins, and monoclonal antibodies. Additionally, we
provide related services as a contract resource to assist our customers in developing cell production process protocols, cell line optimization, cell culture production optimization, media evaluation and other related services. This segment of our
business represented approximately $1.5 million (approximately 41%) and $2.0 million (approximately 37%) in revenues for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, and 2008 respectively.

Our customers include biopharmaceutical and biotech companies, medical schools, universities, research facilities, hospitals and public and private
laboratories. We generally produce cell culture products pursuant to contracts which specify the customers requirements for the cell culture products to be produced or the services to be performed.

There are various processes commonly used to produce mammalian cells generally used in the production of antibodies. These may include hollow-fiber
bioreactor perfusion, stirred tank fermentation, roller bottle and other processes. We primarily use hollow-fiber bioreactor technology to expand customer provided cell lines and produce the respective monoclonal antibodies. This technology grows
cells to higher densities which more closely mimics mammalian physiology. We have significant expertise with in vitro (outside the living body) cell culture methods for a wide variety of mammalian cells. Mammalian cells are complicated and dynamic,
with constantly changing needs. A primary component of hollow-fiber bioreactors is fibers made of plastic polymers. The fibers are hair-like with hollow centers which simulate human capillaries. Thousands of these fibers are inserted in a cartridge,
which we refer to as a bioreactor. The cells are grown on the outside of the hollow fibers while nutrient media used to support cell growth is perfused through the lumen of the fibers. The fiber walls have small pores, allowing nutrients to pass
from the hollow center to the cells. The fibers act as filters and yield concentrated secreted products. Because the cells are immobilized in the bioreactor, the concentrated product can be harvested during the on-going cell growth process.
Hollow-fiber technology permits harvests of cell culture products with generally higher purities thereby reducing the cost of downstream purification processes. This technology generally minimizes the amount of costly nutrient media required for
cell growth.

The most generally used process for mammalian cell production is stirred tank fermentation. Hollow-fiber bioreactor technology
can be contrasted with the competitive stirred tank fermentation process which takes place in tanks of various sizes. Cells are grown inside the tanks in culture medium which is maintained under controlled conditions and continuously stirred to
stimulate growth. At the end of the growing process, as opposed to incrementally during the growth process, cells are separated from the medium and the protein of interest is isolated through a series of complex purification processes. The size of
the tanks generally result in stirred tank fermentation facilities requiring significantly more start-up costs, space and infrastructure than comparable production facilities using hollow-fiber technology. While stirred tank fermentation and hollow
fiber technology are both used for cell production of various quantities, we believe that the stirred tank fermentation process is currently more commonly used for larger scale commercial production requirements. We believe that hollow-fiber
technology has advantages in scalability, start-up time and cost in the early development of antibody production. In the expanding field of personalized medicine where patient specific drugs and therapeutics are frequently envisioned, such as the
therapeutic vaccine which we are developing, we believe that hollow-fiber technology may be the appropriate cell culture production technology.

COMPETITION FOR BIOVAXID

If approved,
BiovaxID® will be required to compete with currently approved therapies, as well as therapies which may be
approved in the future. There are currently no approved therapies which use BiovaxIDs mode of action, which is to induce an adaptive, specific and durable immune response to identify and eradicate the residual lymphoma cells remaining after a
patient achieves remission in an effort to extend that remission or avoid relapse. BiovaxID is a therapy designed to be administered to lymphoma patients who have achieved complete remission after initial chemotherapy treatment. BiovaxID represents
a new treatment approach which utilizes the biology of lymphoma to selectively stimulate the patients own immune system to identify and kill cancerous B-cells that we believe may optimize and complement existing therapies.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

BiovaxID is the only personalized cancer vaccine for treatment of FL that has
demonstrated significant clinical benefit in a Phase 3 clinical trial. Two other vaccines
(MyVaxTMdeveloped by Genitope Corporation and
Specifid developed by Favrille, Inc.) which were studied in Phase 3 trials in FL patients did not report statistically significant clinical benefit. There are fundamental structural differences between BiovaxID and the personalized cancer
vaccines developed by Genitope Corporation and Favrille, Inc., as well as with regards to the clinical trial designs under which the clinical efficacy of these vaccines were tested, which we believe explain why BiovaxID achieved significant clinical
benefit while the other vaccines did not.

Chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies are widely used for the treatment of FL. Although
chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies can substantially reduce the tumor mass and in most instances achieve clinical remission, the remission is generally of limited duration. FL patients generally relapse and the cancer usually becomes
increasingly resistant to further chemotherapy treatments. The patients response to therapy becomes briefer and weaker with each additional course of therapy, that eventually further chemotherapy would offer no clinical benefit.

A number of passive immunotherapies, such as rituximab and radioimmunotherapeutic agents (radioisotopes linked to monoclonal antibodies), are approved by
the FDA for the treatment of FL. A monoclonal antibody is a type of antibody produced in large quantity that is specific to an antigen that is expressed by tumor cells but may also be expressed by at least some normal cells. These therapies have
been used as primary treatment and also as part of combination induction therapy including chemotherapy and rituximab based therapy is considered to be the standard of care to treat FL. In an effort to prolong the duration of the clinical remission
monoclonal antibodies have increasingly been used as maintenance therapies; however, such treatments are off-label and no maintenance therapy is currently FDA approved to treat FL. Supplemental marketing applications have been filed with
the FDA and EMEA in 2010 to expand the indication for rituximab to include its use as a maintenance therapy for NHL, and it is anticipated that such approvals will be granted. However, the prolonged use of rituximab results in a substantial
proportion of patients becoming non-responsive to rituximab-based therapy over time.

Generally, these therapies do not provide unlimited
remissions for most patients. Rituximab has a different mode of action from BiovaxID and we are developing BiovaxID as a new therapeutic approach to treat FL. We believe that BiovaxID may be consistent with an additive to therapies based on
rituximab.

If BiovaxID is approved for treatment of MCL, it will be required to compete with other approved and/or
development therapies for the treatment of MCL. There are currently no FDA-approved therapies for the first line treatment of MCL and the only approved therapy, bortezomib
(Velcade®) is indicated for patients in relapse.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY

We own several patents covering various aspects of our hollow-fiber perfusion process, instruments and proprietary cell culturing methods. Our patents
also cover aspects of our therapeutic vaccine production process. We plan to continue pursuing patent and other proprietary protection for our cancer vaccine technology and instrumentation. Currently, we have four (4) issued United States
patents. Additionally, we have filed several patent applications that are pending. The expiration dates of our presently issued United States patents range from October 2011 to November 2017. A list of our active U.S. patents and published U.S. and
foreign patent applications are as follows:



|           |  |                                                            |  |                             |  |                
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Patent No. |  | Title and Inventor(s)                                      |  | Filing Date/Issue Date      |  | Expiration Date
|5,998,184  |  | BASKET-TYPE BIOREACTOR by Yuan Shi                         |  | Oct. 8, 1997/Dec. 7, 1999   |  | Oct. 8, 2017   
|           |  |                                                            | 
|5,330,915  |  | PRESSURE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A BIOREACTOR by John R. Wilson |  | Oct. 18, 1991/Jul. 19, 1994 |  | Oct. 18, 2011  
|           |  |                                                            | 
|5,541,105  |  | METHOD OF CULTURING LEUKOCYTES by Georgiann B. Melink      |  | Apr. 26, 1994/Jul. 30, 1996 |  | July 30, 2013  
|           |  |                                                            | 
|6,001,585  |  | MICRO HOLLOW FIBER BIOREACTOR by Michael J. Gramer         |  | Nov. 14, 1997/Dec 14, 1999  |  | Nov. 14, 2017  



15



---

##### Table of Contents

|                |  |                                                                                                                                                   |  |                             
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Publication No. |  | Title and Inventor(s)                                                                                                                             |  | Filing Date/Publication Date
|US 2009/0215022 |  | EXTRA-CAPILLARY FLUID CYCLING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CELL CULTURE DEVICE by Darrell P. Page et al.                                               |  | Nov. 20, 2008/Aug. 27, 2009 
|                |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|US 2009/0269841 |  | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CELLS AND CELL PRODUCTS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF by Robert J. Wojciechowski et al.                        |  | Nov. 20, 2008/Oct. 29, 2009 
|                |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|EP 2027247      |  | EXTRA-CAPILLARY FLUID CYCLING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CELL CULTURE DEVICE by Darrell P. Page et al.                                               |  | May 21, 2007/Feb. 25, 2009  
|                |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|EP 2029722      |  | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CELLS AND CELL PRODUCTS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF by Robert J. Wojciechowski et al.                        |  | May 21, 2007/Mar. 4, 2009   
|                |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|WO 2010/042644  |  | METHODS FOR INDUCING A SUSTAINED IMMUNE RESPONSE AGAINST A B-CELL IDIOTYPE USING AUTOLOGOUS ANTI-IDIOTYPIC VACCINES by Angelos M. Stergiou et al. |  | Oct. 7, 2009/Apr. 15, 2010  
|                |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|WO 2010/048417  |  | PERFUSION BIOREACTORS, CELL CULTURE SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR PRODUCTION OF CELLS AND CELL PRODUCTS by Mark Hirschel et al.                        |  | Oct. 22, 2009/Apr. 29, 2010 

We also possess
licensed intellectual property used in the development and manufacture of BiovaxID. BiovaxID is manufactured with a proprietary cell line, which we have licensed on a world-wide exclusive basis from Stanford. This is significant, because
we believe that the use of any cell line other than our exclusively licensed cell line, in the production of a similar idiotype vaccine, would require filing a separate IND application and undergoing clinical testing evaluation by the FDA.

Additionally, we consider trademarks to be important to our business. We have established trademarks covering various
aspects of our hollow-fiber perfusion process, instruments and proprietary cell culturing methods. We have registered the trademark
BiovaxID® in connection with our therapeutic cancer vaccine. We plan to continue aggressively pursuing
trademark and other proprietary protection for our therapeutic vaccine technology and instrumentation, including seeking protection of our trademarks internationally.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The FDA
has extensive regulatory authority over biopharmaceutical products (drugs and diagnostic products produced from biologic processes). The principal FDA regulations that pertain to our cell production activity include, but are not limited to 21CFR
Parts 600 and 610  General Biological Products and Standards; 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211  current Good Manufacturing Practices for Finished Pharmaceuticals; 21 CFR Part 820  Quality System Regulations (medical devices); and 21 CFR
Part 58  Good Laboratory Practice for Non-Clinical Laboratory Studies. FDAs guidelines include controls over procedures and systems related to the production of mammalian proteins and quality control testing of any new biological drug or
product intended for use in humans (including, to a somewhat lesser degree, in vivo biodiagnostic products). FDA guidelines are intended to assure that the biological drug or product meets the requirements through rigorous testing with respect to
safety, efficacy, and meet the purity characteristics for identity and strength. FDA approvals for the use of new biological drugs or products (that can never be assured) require several rounds of extensive preclinical testing and clinical
investigations conducted by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company prior to sale and use of the product. At each stage, the approvals granted by the FDA include the manufacturing process utilized to produce the product. Accordingly, our cell culture
systems used for the production of therapeutic or biotherapeutic products (biological drug or product) are subject to significant regulation by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended (the FD&C Act).



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Our cell culture systems used to produce cells for diagnostic uses are regulated under the FD&C Act as
Class I medical devices. Medical devices are classified by the FDA into three classes (Class I, Class II and Class III) based upon the potential risk to the consumer posed by the medical device (Class I devices pose the least amount of risk, while
Class III devices and new devices are presumed to inherently pose the greatest amount of risk). As Class I devices, our systems must be manufactured in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices guidelines. Sales of such systems to
customers using them to manufacture materials for clinical studies and licensure do not require prior FDA approval.

The process of complying
with FDA guidelines and obtaining approvals from the FDA of applications to market biopharmaceutical drugs and products is costly, time consuming and subject to unanticipated delays. There is no assurance that our customers will be able to obtain
FDA approval for biological drugs and products produced with our systems, and failure to receive such approvals may adversely affect the demand for our services.

Under the FD&C Act, our customers must establish and validate Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) utilizing our cell culture technologies in their
Drug Master Files. We provide assistance in operational, validation, calibration and preventive maintenance SOPs to customers, as needed, to support their product development and commercialization processes. For example, we will typically provide
existing and prospective customers who are utilizing our contract production services or constructing production facilities based on our cell culture technologies with information to enable such customers to comply with the FDAs guidelines
required for facility layout and design. This information may be provided either in a drug/biologic Master File that we give permission to customers to cross reference in their submission to the FDA, or provided to customers to include in their FDA
submissions.

As we currently do business in a significant number of countries, in addition to the requirements of the FDA, we are subject to
the regulations of other countries and governmental agencies which apply to our goods and services when sold in their jurisdiction.

We are
subject to various regulations regarding handling and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, wastes and chemicals such as cells and their secreted waste products, including those enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency and various
state and local agencies.

INSURANCE

We may be exposed to potential product liability claims by users of our products. We presently maintain product liability insurance coverage, in
connection with our systems and other products and services, in amounts which we believe to be adequate and on acceptable terms.

Although, we
believe that our current level of coverage is adequate to protect our business from foreseeable product liability and clinical trial claims, we may seek to increase our insurance coverage in the future in the event that we significantly increase our
level of contract production services. There can be no assurance; however, that we will be able to maintain our existing coverage or obtain additional coverage on acceptable terms, or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against all
potential claims to which we may be exposed. A successful partially or completely uninsured claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Our cell culture production services may expose us to potential risk of liability.
We seek to obtain agreements from contract production customers to mitigate such potential liability and to indemnify us under certain circumstances. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in obtaining such agreements or that
such indemnification, if obtained, will adequately protect us against potential claims.

The terms and conditions of our sales and instruments
include provisions which are intended to limit our liability for indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages.

EMPLOYEES

As of September 30, 2009, we had 31 employees, including four in research and development, five in manufacturing and quality
control, six in contract production services, one in marketing and sales, four in management, and six in finance, accounting, administrative, and clerical positions. We supplement our staff with temporary employees and consultants as required. We
believe that our relations with employees are satisfactory. None of our employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Our
ability to continue to develop and improve marketable products and to establish and maintain our competitive position in light of technological developments will depend, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified technical personnel.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 35,000 square feet in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which we use for offices, a laboratory, manufacturing, warehousing areas to support
the production of perfusion cell culture equipment, and contract cell culture services. This facility lease agreement has expired and we continue to occupy this facility on a month-to-month basis with a long-term lease currently being negotiated
which is expected to include improvements to the facility to provide a dedicated laboratory space for the production of BiovaxID and potential future expansion to the facility to permit additional BiovaxID production capacity when required.

We leased approximately 17,000 square feet in Worcester, Massachusetts, which we used for BiovaxID production, contract cell production,
offices, and storage. We had extended our lease term on this facility through February 28, 2010. On December 8, 2008, the Bankruptcy Court in our Chapter 11 proceeding entered an Order confirming the rejection of this Worcester lease, and
we no longer occupy these premises.

We leased approximately 24,000 square feet in St. Louis, Missouri under a three year lease term which
runs through January 2010. On December 1, 2008, we amended our lease in St. Louis, Missouri, which shortened the lease term to November 30, 2009 and decreased the leased premises to 10,000 square feet and on March 31, 2009, pursuant
to the terms of the amended lease, we terminated the lease.

We anticipate that our facilities will meet our needs during fiscal 2010. We
anticipate that as our development of BiovaxID advances and as we prepare for the future commercialization of our products, our facilities requirements will increase.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

Risk Factors

Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K not strictly historical in nature are forward-looking statements. These statements may
include, but are not limited to, statements about: the timing of the commencement, enrollment, and completion of our clinical trials for our product candidates; the progress or success of our product development programs; the status of regulatory
approvals for our product candidates; the timing of product launches; our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others; and our estimates for future
performance, anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements, and our needs for additional financing. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as anticipates, believes,
could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential, predicts, projects, should, will, would,
goal, or other variations of these terms (including their use in the negative) or by discussions of strategies, plans or intentions. These statements are only predictions based on current information and expectations and involve a number
of risks and uncertainties. The under lying information and expectations are likely to change over time.

Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

We have a history of operating losses and expect to incur further losses.

We have never been profitable and we have incurred significant losses and cash flow deficits. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, we reported net losses of $14.7 million, $20.6 million, and $44.3 million respectively and negative cash flow from operating activities of $1.9 million, $8.3 million, and $10.8 million, respectively. As of
September 30, 2009, we have an aggregate accumulated deficit of $132 million. We anticipate that operations may continue to show losses and negative cash flow, particularly with the anticipated expenses associated with the interim analysis
for BiovaxID®. There is no assurance that the additional required funds can be obtained on terms acceptable or
favorable to us, if at all. The audit opinion issued by our independent auditors with respect to our financial statements for the 2009 fiscal year indicated that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We expect to receive a similar audit opinion from our independent auditors with respect to our financial statements for the 2010 fiscal year.

Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability is to a large degree dependent on obtaining regulatory approval to market BiovaxID. We may
not be successful in our efforts to develop and commercialize BiovaxID. Moreover, our operations may not be profitable even if BiovaxID is commercialized.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Our independent registered public accountants have expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to
continue as a going concern.

As of September 30, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $55.2 million,
including those liabilities subject to compromise through our Chapter 11 proceedings. We expect to continue to incur substantial net operating losses at least until
BiovaxID® receives marketing approval, which may never occur. Continued operating losses would impair our
ability to continue operations. We may not be able to generate sufficient product revenue to become profitable on a sustained basis, or at all. We have operating and liquidity concerns due to our significant net losses and negative cash flows from
operations. As a result of these and other factors, our independent registered certified public accountants, Cherry, Bekaert and Holland, LLP, have indicated, in their report to our 2009 financial statements, that there is substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon generating sufficient cash flow to conduct operations and obtaining additional capital and financing. Any financing activity is likely to result
in significant dilution to current shareholders.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We incurred net losses of $14.7 million, $20.6 million, and $44.3 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. We have also experienced negative cash flows from
operations for the past three fiscal years. In addition, our projected cash receipts from operations for fiscal 2010 are anticipated to be insufficient to finance operations without funding from other sources. We have had difficulty in meeting our
cash requirements. We have, in part, met our cash requirements through proceeds from our cell culture and instrument manufacturing activities, various financing transactions, the use of cash on hand, short-term borrowings (primarily from
affiliates), and by trade-vendor credit. There can be no assurances that management will obtain the necessary funding, reduce the level of historical losses and achieve successful commercialization of the vaccine. Continuation as a going concern is
ultimately dependent upon achieving profitable operations and positive operating cash flows sufficient to pay all obligations as they come due.

We have not filed required annual or quarterly SEC reports since October 2008

Our common stock is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act requires
that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission current and accurate information in annual reports and quarterly reports. Until the acceptance of this filing and the filing of the remainder of the delinquent periodic reports, we are
delinquent in several of our periodic filing obligations, including not having timely filed our annual reports for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years and our quarterly reports for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. A company that has not filed all of
its Section 13 reports is not considered current in its Exchange Act reporting. Delinquent filers do not satisfy the current public information requirement of Securities Act Rule 144(c)(1) or the reporting issuer definition of Rule
902(l) of Regulation S. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission may pursue an enforcement action against delinquent filers, such as an administrative proceeding to suspend trading pursuant to Section (12)(k) of the Exchange Act, or
a civil action seeking an injunction, and/or civil monetary penalties against the delinquent filers and/or its directors. At the present time, we cannot say what, if any, action the Securities and Exchange Commission may take against us; however,
any such action could have an adverse impact on our Company.

We will need substantial additional financing but our access to capital
funding is uncertain.

During prior years, we met our cash requirements through the use of cash on hand, the sale of common stock, and
short-term loans from affiliates. In 2003, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia). The aggregate investment commitment received from Accentia was $20.0 million. Additionally, Accentia has loaned us
or otherwise paid on our behalf an additional $12.6 million through September 30, 2009, as represented by three secured demand promissory notes. We have been informed by Accentia that provisions of certain of its loan and debenture financing
agreements preclude Accentia from making any additional direct cash contributions to us. Additionally, we have borrowed funds from third parties. Furthermore, because much of this indebtedness is secured by all of our assets, including the assets of
our subsidiaries, our creditors may be able to foreclose on our assets if we are unable to meet our obligations as they become due. In addition, we are obligated to pay royalties which will reduce profit.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Our ability to continue present operations is dependent upon our ability to obtain significant external
funding. Additional sources of funding have not been established; however, additional financing is currently being sought from a number of sources other than Accentia, including the sale of equity or debt securities, strategic collaborations,
recognized research funding programs, as well as domestic and/or foreign licensing of our vaccine and our AutovaxID equipment line. We are exploring various financing alternatives, and have hired investment consultants to assist in these
efforts. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing such financing at acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available from the foregoing sources, or if we determine it to otherwise be in our best interests, we
may consider additional strategic financing options, including sales of assets or business units that are non-essential to the ongoing development or future commercialization of BiovaxID and AutovaxID, or we may be required to delay, reduce the
scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or curtail some of our commercialization efforts.

There is a
high risk of failure because we are trying to develop a new anti-cancer vaccine.

We are pursuing a novel patient specific cancer therapy.
Commercialization requires governmental approval, establishment of cost effective production capability, distribution capability and market acceptance. Our vaccine is subject to all of the risks of failure that are inherent in developing products
based on new technologies and the risks associated with drug development generally. These risks include the possibility that:



| |  |  | our technology or the product based on our technology will be ineffective or toxic, or otherwise fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | future products based on our technology will be difficult to manufacture on a large scale or at all or will prove to be uneconomical to produce or
market;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | proprietary rights of third parties will prevent us or our collaborators from marketing products;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | third parties will market superior or equivalent products; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the products will not attain market acceptance.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------

Drug development, including clinical trials required for governmental approval, is expensive and new drugs have a high risk of failure. Based on results
at any stage of development, including later-stage clinical trials and our inability to bear the related costs associated with product development or product production or marketing, we may decide to discontinue development or clinical trial at any
time.

Preparing for and processing the Biologics License Application (BLA) for BiovaxID will be expensive and time consuming. The FDA
response to any application is uncertain and the FDA may reject or deny the application, or may impose additional requirements. Such additional requirements may be expensive and/or time consuming, and meeting these additional requirements may be
difficult or impossible.

We might be unable to manufacture our vaccine on a commercial scale.

Assuming approval of
BiovaxID®, manufacturing, supply and quality control problems could arise as we, either alone or with
subcontractors, attempt to scale-up manufacturing capabilities for products under development. We might be unable to scale-up in a timely manner or at a commercially reasonable cost. Problems could lead to delays or pose a threat to the ultimate
commercialization of our product and cause us to fail.

Manufacturing facilities, and those of any future contract manufacturers, are or will
be subject to periodic regulatory inspections by the FDA and other federal and state regulatory agencies and these facilities are subject to Quality System Regulation, or QSR, requirements of the FDA. If we or our third-party manufacturers fail to
maintain facilities in accordance with QSR regulations, other international quality standards, or other regulatory requirements, then the manufacture process could be suspended or terminated, which would harm us.

Because the product development and the regulatory approval process for
BiovaxID® will be expensive and its outcome is uncertain, we must incur substantial expenses that might not
result in any viable product and the process could take longer than expected.

Regulatory approval of a pharmaceutical product is a
lengthy, time-consuming and expensive process. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our vaccine, we must demonstrate that BiovaxID is safe and effective for use in humans. This is expected to result in substantial expense
and require significant time.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Historically, the results from pre-clinical testing and early clinical trials often have not been predictive
of results obtained in later clinical trials. A number of new drugs have shown promising results in clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. Data obtained
from pre-clinical and clinical activities are susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, regulatory delays or rejections could be encountered as a result of many factors, including
changes in regulatory policy during the period of product development.

Clinical trials conducted by us or by third parties on our behalf
might not demonstrate sufficient safety, efficacy or statistical significance to obtain the requisite regulatory approval for our products. Regulatory authorities might not permit us to undertake any additional clinical trials for our product
candidates.

We have completed a single Phase 3 clinical trial for BiovaxID; however, we cannot be certain that FDA will not require
additional clinical trials, either prior to or in conjunction with approval of BiovaxID. Our initial Phase 3 clinical trial spanned approximately eight years and the completion of any required additional clinical trials would likely take a
significant number of years. The length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the product candidate. Although for planning purposes we forecast the commencement and completion of
clinical development, and have included many of those forecasts in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public disclosures, the actual timing of these events can vary dramatically. For example, we
have experienced delays in our clinical development program in the past as a result of slower than anticipated patient enrollment. These delays may recur. Our rate of completion of development efforts could be delayed by many factors. In addition,
we may need to delay or suspend this regulatory process if we are unable to obtain additional funding when needed. Moreover, we have limited experience in vaccine development and the regulatory process.

We cannot predict the impact, if any, that Fast Track designation will have on the regulatory
approval process for BiovaxID®.

The FDA has granted Fast Track review designation to BiovaxID for the indication of FL, which means that this product may be eligible
for expedited review procedures by the FDA. However, we cannot predict the impact, if any, that Fast Track designation will actually have on the duration of the regulatory approval process for this product candidate, and the FDA may deny
regulatory approval of this product candidate notwithstanding its Fast Track designation.

We may experience
difficulties in manufacturing BiovaxID® or in obtaining approval of the change in manufacturing site from the
FDA, which could prevent or delay us in the commercialization of BiovaxID.

Manufacturing BiovaxID is complex and requires coordination
internally among our employees, as well as, externally with physicians, hospitals and third-party suppliers and carriers. This process involves several risks that may lead to failures or delays in manufacturing BiovaxID, including:



| |  |  | difficulties in obtaining adequate tumor samples from physicians;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in timely shipping of tumor samples to us or in the shipping of BiovaxID to the treating physicians due to errors by third-party carriers,
transportation restrictions or other reasons;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | destruction of, or damage to, tumor samples or BiovaxID during the shipping process due to the improper handling by third-party carriers, hospitals,
physicians or us;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | destruction of, or damage to, tumor samples or BiovaxID during storage at our facility; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in ensuring the availability, quality, and consistency of materials provided by our suppliers.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we experience any difficulties in manufacturing BiovaxID, the commercialization of BiovaxID may be delayed, resulting in delays in generating revenue
and increased costs.

In addition, because we have relocated the site of the manufacturing process to our Minneapolis facility following the
clinical trials we are required to demonstrate to the FDA that the product under new conditions is comparable to the product that was the subject of earlier clinical testing. This requirement applies to the relocation at the Minneapolis facility as
well as future expansions of the manufacturing facilities, such as the possible expansion to additional facilities that may be required for successful commercialization of the vaccine, resulting in increased costs. There is also a requirement for
validation of the manufacturing process for BiovaxID utilizing our AutovaxID instrument.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

A showing of comparability requires data demonstrating that the product continues to be safe, pure, and
potent and may be based on chemical, physical, and biological assays and, in some cases, other non-clinical data. If we demonstrate comparability, additional clinical safety and/or efficacy trials with the new product may not be needed. The FDA will
determine if comparability data are sufficient to demonstrate that additional clinical studies are unnecessary. If the FDA requires additional clinical safety or efficacy trials to demonstrate comparability, our clinical trials or FDA approval of
BiovaxID may be delayed, which would cause delays in generating revenue and increased costs.

Because we have limited experience, we might
be unsuccessful in our efforts to develop, obtain approval for, commercially produce or successfully market BiovaxID.

The extent to which
we develop and commercialize BiovaxID will depend on our ability to:



| |  |  | complete required clinical trials;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | obtain necessary regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Establish, or contract for, required manufacturing capacity; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Establish, or contract for, sales and marketing resources.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

We have limited experience with these activities and might not be successful in the trials, product development or commercialization.

Competing technologies may adversely affect us.

Biotechnology has experienced, and is expected to continue to experience, rapid and significant change. The use of monoclonal
antibodies as initial or induction therapy, and increasingly for maintenance therapy, has become well-established and generally accepted. Products that are well-established or accepted, including monoclonal antibodies such as
Rituxan®, including its anticipated pending expanded approval as a NHL maintenance therapy, may constitute
significant barriers to market penetration and regulatory approval which may be expensive, difficult or even impossible to overcome. New developments in biotechnological processes are expected to continue at a rapid pace in both industry and
academia, and these developments are likely to result in commercial applications competitive with our proposed vaccine. We expect to encounter intense competition from a number of companies that offer products in our targeted application area. We
anticipate that our competitors in these areas will consist of both well-established and development-stage companies and will include:



| |  |  | healthcare companies;
| | - |  | ---------------------



| |  |  | chemical and biotechnology companies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | biopharmaceutical companies; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | companies developing drug discovery technologies.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

The cell culture production and technology business is also intensely competitive and is in many areas dominated by large service providers. In many
instances, our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, research and other resources and larger, more established marketing, sales, distribution and service organizations than us. Moreover, these competitors may offer broader
product lines and have greater name recognition than us and may offer discounts as a competitive tactic.

Competitors might succeed in
developing, marketing, or obtaining FDA approval for technologies, products, or services that are more effective or commercially attractive than those we offer or are developing, or that render our products or services obsolete. As these companies
develop their technologies, they might develop proprietary positions, which might prevent us from successfully commercializing products. Also, we might not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, distribution or support
capabilities to compete successfully in the future.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Our clinical trials for
BiovaxID® may not be regarded by the FDA or other regulatory authorities as conclusive, and we may decide, or
regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical testing for this product candidate or cease our trials.

In
April 2008, we closed our only Phase 3 clinical trial of BiovaxID® with 234 patients enrolled instead of the 563
patients anticipated to be enrolled pursuant to our clinical trial protocol. We announced clinical results based upon a relatively smaller number of patients. Additionally, our only Phase 3 clinical trial enrolled or randomized patients before their
treatment with chemotherapy resulting in a significant number of patients being randomized but not treated with either BiovaxID or control because of failure to maintain compliance with protocol requirements including maintenance of complete
remission. We do not know if the design of our Phase 3 clinical trial or an evaluation, which is limited to only patients that received at least one dose of BiovaxID or control, will be acceptable to the FDA for demonstrating sufficient safety and
efficacy required to obtain marketing approval.

While the Phase 3 clinical trial reported clinical benefit that was statistically significant
(p-value of 0.045) in patients receiving at least one dose of BiovaxID or control, the results did not achieve high statistical significance which is generally considered to be a p-value of 0.01 or better. While it is not required, it is
not uncommon for the FDA to require a second confirming Phase 3 clinical trial, when high statistical significance has not been demonstrated. We do not know whether our existing or future clinical trials will be considered by the FDA
and/or other regulatory authorities to sufficiently demonstrate safety and efficacy to result in marketing approval. Because our clinical trials for BiovaxID may be considered to be inconclusive, we may decide, or regulators may require us, to
conduct additional clinical and/or preclinical testing for this product candidate or cease our clinical trials. If this happens, we may not be able to obtain approval for this product or the anticipated time to market for this product may be
substantially delayed, and we may also experience significant additional development costs. We may also be required to undertake additional clinical testing if we change or expand the indications for our product candidate.

The ongoing detailed analysis being performed in our clinical trials for
BiovaxID® may produce negative or inconclusive results and may delay our efforts to obtain approval for this
product.

We are currently engaged in performing detailed analyses of the safety and efficacy data generated by our Phase 3 clinical trial
of BiovaxID in FL and our Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL. We cannot predict with certainty the results of the analyses, and if the results are negative or inconclusive we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and/or
preclinical testing for this product candidate or cease our clinical trials. If this happens, we may not be able to obtain approval for BiovaxID for FL, MCL or both, or the anticipated time to market for this product may be substantially delayed,
and we may also experience significant additional development costs.

The clinical trials for
BiovaxID® have demonstrated that certain side effects may be associated with this treatment, and ongoing or
future clinical trials may reveal additional unexpected or unanticipated side effects.

We cannot guarantee that our current or future
trials for BiovaxID will not demonstrate additional adverse side effects that may delay or even preclude regulatory approval. Even if BiovaxID receives regulatory approval, if we or others identify previously unknown side effects following approval,
regulatory approval could be withdrawn and sales of BiovaxID could be significantly reduced.

Inability to obtain regulatory approval for
our manufacturing facility or to manufacture on a commercial scale may delay or disrupt our commercialization efforts.

Before we can obtain FDA approval for any new drug, the manufacturing facility for the drug must be inspected and approved by the FDA.
Therefore, before we can obtain the FDA approval necessary to allow us to begin commercially manufacturing BiovaxID®, we must pass a pre-approval inspection of our BiovaxID manufacturing facility by the FDA. In order to obtain approval, we will need to ensure that all of our processes, methods, and equipment are compliant with the current Good
Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, and perform extensive audits of vendors, contract laboratories, and suppliers. The cGMP requirements govern quality control of the manufacturing process and documentation policies and procedures. We have undertaken
steps towards achieving compliance with these regulatory requirements required for commercialization. In complying with cGMP, we will be obligated to expend time, money, and effort in production, record keeping, and quality control to assure that
the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could experience product liability claims from patients receiving our vaccines, we might be subject to possible regulatory action
and we may be limited in the jurisdictions in which we are permitted to sell BiovaxID.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

In order to commercialize BiovaxID, we will need to develop and qualify one or more additional manufacturing
facilities. Preparing a facility for commercial manufacturing may involve unanticipated delays, and the costs of complying with state, local, and FDA regulations may be higher than we anticipate. In addition, any material changes we make to the
manufacturing process may require approval by the FDA and state or foreign regulatory authorities. Obtaining these approvals is a lengthy, involved process, and we may experience delays. Such delays could increase costs and adversely affect our
business. In general, the FDA views cGMP standards as being more rigorously applied as products move forward in development and commercialization. In seeking to comply with these standards, we may encounter problems with, among other things,
controlling costs and quality control and assurance. It may be difficult to maintain compliance with cGMP standards as the development and commercialization of BiovaxID progresses, if it progresses.

We and our products are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA in the U.S. and by comparable authorities in other countries. These national
agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate, among other things, the preclinical and clinical testing, safety, approval, manufacture, labeling, marketing, export, storage, record keeping, advertising and promotion of our products.
If we violate regulatory requirements at any stage, whether before or after marketing approval is obtained, we may be subject to forced removal of a product from the market, product seizure, civil and criminal penalties and other adverse
consequences.

We cannot predict the impact, if any, that Orphan Drug exclusivity status will have on the
regulatory approval process for BiovaxID®.

In October 2009, the FDA granted Orphan Drug designation to BiovaxID for the treatment of FL. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant Orphan Drug
designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which generally is a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. After the FDA grants Orphan Drug designation to a product,
the generic identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are publicly disclosed by the FDA. Orphan Drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. If a
product which has an Orphan Drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other
applications to market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances such as greater effectiveness, greater safety, major contribution to patient care, or inadequate supply.

Even though it has been designated as an Orphan Drug, BiovaxID may not be approved, or may not be approved before other applications, or granted orphan
drug exclusivity if approved. Our competitors may obtain orphan drug exclusivity for products competitive with our product candidate before we do or even if we do not obtain such status, in which case we would be excluded from that market if the FDA
deems the competitive drug to be the same drug as BiovaxID. Even though we obtained orphan drug exclusivity for BiovaxID for FL, we may not be able to maintain it. For example, if a competitive product is shown to be clinically superior to our
product, any orphan drug exclusivity we have obtained will not block the approval of such competitive product.

We anticipate submitting an
application for Orphan Drug designation for BiovaxID for the treatment of MCL. We cannot predict whether Orphan Drug designation will be granted for BiovaxID for the treatment of MCL, and if granted, we cannot predict the impact, if any, that Orphan
Drug designation will have on the regulatory approval process for BiovaxID in MCL

We are not able to prevent third
parties, including potential competitors, from developing and selling an anti-cancer vaccine for NHL having the same composition of matter as
BiovaxID®.

Our BiovaxID vaccine is based on research and studies conducted at Stanford and the NCI. As a result of published studies, the concept of the vaccine and
its composition of matter are in the public domain and cannot be patented by us, the NCI, or any other party. We have filed a PCT patent application on the type of cell media that is used to grow cell cultures in the production of our vaccine, and
we have filed a PCT patent application on certain features of the integrated production and purification system used to produce and purify the vaccine in an automated closed system. We have obtained and exclusive world-wide license for use of a
proprietary cell line which we use to manufacture BiovaxID, but we cannot be certain that we will be successful in preventing others from utilizing this cell line or will be able to maintain and enforce the exclusive license in all jurisdictions. We
cannot prevent other companies using different manufacturing processes from developing active immunotherapies that directly compete with BiovaxID. For example, Bayer Innovation GmbH has commenced a Phase 1 clinical trial for its autologous
anti-idiotype lymphoma vaccine produced in a tobacco plant cell line.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Several companies, such as Genentech, Inc., Corixa Corporation, Biogen Idec, and
Immunomedics, Inc., are involved in the development of passive immunotherapies for NHL. These passive immunotherapies include
Rituxan®, a monoclonal antibody, and
Zevalin® and
Bexxar®, which are passive radioimmunotherapy products. Passive immunotherapies, particularly the monoclonal
antibody Rituxan, are well accepted and established in the treatment of NHL and as such will impact both regulatory considerations and market penetration.

We currently depend on a sole-source supplier for KLH, a critical raw material used in the manufacture of
BiovaxID®, and physicians who administer BiovaxID depend on a sole-source supplier for GM-CSF, an immune system
stimulant administered with BiovaxID.

We currently depend on single source suppliers for critical raw materials used in BiovaxID and other
components used in the manufacturing process and required for the administration of BiovaxID. In particular, manufacturing of BiovaxID requires keyhole limpet hemocyanin, or KLH, a foreign carrier protein. We purchase KLH from BioSyn Arzneimittel
GmbH, or BioSyn, a single source supplier. We have entered into a supply agreement with BioSyn, pursuant to which BioSyn has agreed to supply us with KLH. The supply agreement has an initial term of three years and is renewable for indefinite
additional terms of five years each at our discretion, so long as we are not in default of our obligations pursuant to this agreement. Either party may terminate the supply agreement earlier upon a breach that is not cured within 60 days or other
events relating to insolvency or bankruptcy. Under this agreement, BioSyn is not contractually obligated to supply us with the amounts of KLH necessary for commercialization. We have become aware of additional suppliers who now market KLH, but we
have not yet established a relationship with these suppliers and have not performed testing to insure that the KLH supplied by them is suitable for use in the BiovaxID production process.

When BiovaxID is administered, the administering physician uses a cytokine to enhance the patients immune response, and this
cytokine is administered concurrently with BiovaxID. The cytokine used by physicians for this purpose is
Leukine® sargramostim, a commercially available recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating
factor known as GM-CSF. This cytokine is a substance that is purchased by the administering physician and is administered with an antigen to enhance or increase the immune response to that antigen. The physicians who administer BiovaxID will rely on
Berlex Inc., or Berlex, as a supplier of GM-CSF, and these physicians will generally not have the benefit of a long-term supply contract with Berlex. GM-CSF is not commercially available from other sources in the United States or Canada.

Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these materials or components may take a substantial amount of time. In addition, we may have
difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA.

If we have to switch to a replacement supplier,
we may face additional regulatory delays and the manufacture and delivery of BiovaxID could be interrupted for an extended period of time, which may delay commercialization of BiovaxID. If, we are unable to obtain adequate amounts of these
components, we may be required to obtain regulatory clearance from the FDA to use different components that may not be as safe or as effective. As a result, regulatory approval of BiovaxID may be suspended or delayed or may not be received at all.
All these delays could cause delays in commercialization of BiovaxID, delays in our ability to generate revenue from BiovaxID, and increased costs.

Other than BioSyn and Berlex, we are not dependent on any sole-source suppliers.

The NCI is not precluded from working with other companies on developing products that are competitive with
BiovaxID®.

Our BiovaxID vaccine is based on research and studies conducted at Stanford and the NCI. The concept of producing a patient-specific anti-cancer vaccine
through the hybridoma method from a patients own cancer cells has been discussed in a variety of publications over a period of many years, and, accordingly, the general method and concept of such a vaccine is not eligible to be patented by us,
the NCI, or any other party. Until November 2006, we were a party to a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, or CRADA, with the NCI for the development of a hybridoma-based patient-specific idiotypic vaccine for the treatment of indolent
FL. We gave notice of termination of the CRADA in September 2006. Although the NCI transferred sponsorship of the IND for BiovaxID to us in 2004, and although there are certain confidentiality protections for information generated pursuant to the
CRADA, the CRADA does not prevent the NCI from working with other companies on other hybridoma-based idiotypic vaccines for indolent FL or other forms of cancer, and the NCI or its future partners may be able to utilize certain technology developed
under our prior CRADA. If the NCI chooses to work with other companies in connection with the development of such a vaccine, such other companies may also develop technology and know-how that may ultimately enable such companies to develop products
that compete with BiovaxID.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Additionally, through their partnership with the NCI, these companies could develop immunotherapies for
other forms of cancer that may serve as barriers to any future products that we may develop for such indications.

The uncertainty of
patent and proprietary technology protection and our potential inability to license technology from third parties may adversely affect us.

Our success will depend in part on obtaining and maintaining meaningful patent protection on our inventions, technologies and discoveries. The patent
position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms is highly uncertain and involves many complex legal and technical issues. There is no clear policy involving the breadth of claims allowed, or the degree of protection afforded, under patents in
this area. Our ability to compete effectively will depend on our ability to develop and maintain proprietary aspects of our technology, as well as to operate without infringing, or, if necessary, to obtain rights to, the proprietary rights of
others. Our pending patent applications might not result in the issuance of patents. Our patent applications might not have priority over others applications and, even if issued, our patents might not offer protection against competitors with
similar technologies. Any patents issued to us might be challenged, invalidated or circumvented and the rights created thereunder may not afford us a competitive advantage. Furthermore, patents that we own or license may not enable us to preclude
competitors from commercializing drugs, and consequently may not provide us with any meaningful competitive advantage.

Our commercial success
also depends in part on our neither infringing patents or proprietary rights of third parties nor breaching any licenses that we have obtained from third parties permitting us to incorporate technology into our products. It is possible that we might
infringe these patents or other patents or proprietary rights of third parties. In the future we might receive notices claiming infringement from third parties. Any legal action against us or our collaborative partners claiming infringement and
damages or seeking to enjoin commercial activities relating to our products and processes may require us or our collaborative partners to alter our products, cease certain activities and/or obtain licenses in order to continue to manufacture or
market the affected products and processes. In addition, these actions may subject us to potential liability for damages. We or our collaborative partners might not prevail in an action, and any license required under a patent might not be made
available on commercially acceptable terms, or at all.

There are many U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications held by third parties
in our areas of interest, and we believe that there may be significant litigation in the industry regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Potential future litigation could result in substantial costs and the diversion of
managements efforts regardless of the merits or result of the litigation. Additionally, from time to time we may engage in the defense and prosecution of interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and related
administrative proceedings that can result in our patent position being limited or in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort by our technical and management personnel. In addition, laws of some foreign countries do not protect
intellectual property to the same extent as do laws in the United States, which could subject us to additional difficulties in protecting our intellectual property in those countries.

We also rely on unpatented technology, trade secrets, technical know-how, confidential information and continuing inventions to develop and maintain our
competitive position. Others might independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology, and we may not be able to protect our rights to our
trade secrets. We seek to protect our technology and patents, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees and contractors. Our employees might breach their existing proprietary information, inventions and dispute resolution agreements.
Accordingly, these agreements may not protect our intellectual property, and our employees breaches of those agreements could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our operating results may fluctuate widely between reporting periods.

Our operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter or year to year, depending on factors such as timing of biopharmaceutical development
and commercialization of products by our customers, the timing of increased research and development and sales and marketing expenditures, the timing and size of contracts and whether we introduce to the market new products or processes.
Consequently, revenues, profits or losses may vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter or year-to- year, and revenue or profits in any period will not necessarily be indicative of results in subsequent periods. These period-to-period fluctuations
in financial results may have a significant impact on the market price, if any, of our securities.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Our contract cell production services are subject to product liability claims.

The contract production services for therapeutic products that we offer expose us to a potential risk of liability as the proteins or other substances
manufactured by us, at the request and to the specifications of our customers, could potentially cause adverse effects. We generally obtain agreements from our contract production customers indemnifying and defending us from any potential liability
arising from such risk.

There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in obtaining such agreements in the future or that
such indemnification agreements will adequately protect us against potential claims relating to such contract production services. We may also be exposed to potential product liability claims by users of our products. We may seek to increase our
insurance coverage in the future in the event of any significant increases in our level of contract production services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing coverage or obtain additional coverage on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all, or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against all potential claims to which we might be exposed. A successful partially or completely uninsured claim against us would have a material adverse effect on our
operations.

Our contract cell production business is subject to intense competition.

The contract cell production business is highly competitive. Customers can select other cell production facilities, other cell production methods and
other cell production instruments. We consider our business environment to be competitive. Many of our competitors are better established with greater capital resources. Historically, our cell production facilities, method and equipment have been
primarily used to produce relatively small batches, such as those used in research and development. While we are seeking broader acceptance of our cell production facilities, method and equipment for larger and commercial scale production, we may
not be successful in cost effectively penetrating these larger markets.

If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain
additional personnel, our efforts would be hindered and we might be unable to develop our own products or pursue collaborations.

Our
success will depend on our ability to attract and retain key employees and scientific advisors. Competition among biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies, as well as, among other organizations and companies, academic institutions and
government entities, for highly skilled scientific and management personnel is intense. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in retaining our existing personnel or advisors, or in attracting additional qualified employees. If we fail to
acquire personnel or if we lose existing personnel, our business could be seriously interrupted.

We do not expect to pay any dividends.

We have not declared or paid cash dividends since our inception. We currently intend to retain all of our earnings to finance future
growth and therefore do not expect to declare or pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Our tax-loss carryforwards are subject to
restrictions.

As of September 30, 2009, we had substantial net operating loss carry-forwards (NOLS) for federal income
tax purposes of approximately $76.0 million (which will begin to expire in 2021) which will be available to offset future taxable income. As a result of certain changes in ownership and pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, utilization of NOLS is limited after an ownership change, as defined in Section 392, to an annual amount equal to the value of the loss corporations outstanding stock immediately before the date of the ownership change
multiplied by the federal long-term exempt tax rate. Due to the various changes in our ownership, and as a result of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, a significant portion of these carry-forwards are subject to significant restrictions with
respect to our ability to use those amounts to offset future taxable income. Use of our NOLS may be further limited as a result of future equity transactions.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

We are subject to various government regulations.

The cell culture systems and services that we sell are subject to significant regulation by the FDA under the FD&C Act. Our cell culture bioprocessing
systems are regulated as Class I medical devices and must be manufactured in accordance with the FDAs QSR requirements. Our cell culture instruments must comply with a variety of safety regulations to be sold in Europe, including, but not
limited, to CE. Our customers who use these cell culture bioprocessing systems must also comply with more extensive and rigorous FDA regulation. The process of complying with FDA regulations and obtaining approvals from the FDA is costly and time
consuming. The process from investigational stage until approval to market can take a minimum of seven and up to as many as ten to twelve years currently and is subject to unanticipated delays. Furthermore, there is no assurance that our customers
will be able to obtain FDA approval for bioproducts produced with their systems.

We use hazardous materials in our business. Any claims
relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of these materials could be costly and time consuming.

Our manufacturing, clinical
laboratory, and research and development processes involve the storage, use and disposal of hazardous substances, including hazardous chemicals and biological hazardous materials. Because we handle biohazardous waste with respect to our contract
production services, we are required to conform to our customers procedures and processes to the standards set by the EPA, as well as those of local environmental protection authorities. Accordingly, we are subject to federal, state and local
regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of materials and waste products. Although we believe that our safety and environmental management practices and procedures for handling and disposing of these hazardous
materials are in accordance with good industry practice and comply with applicable laws, permits, licenses and regulations, the risk of accidental environmental or human contamination or injury from the release or exposure of hazardous materials
cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for any damages that result, including environmental clean-up or decontamination costs, and any such liability could exceed the limits of, or fall outside the
coverage of, our insurance. We may not be able to maintain insurance on acceptable terms, or at all. We could be required to incur significant costs to comply with current or future environmental and public and workplace safety and health laws and
regulations.

The availability and amount of reimbursement for BiovaxID and the manner in which government and private payers may
reimburse for BiovaxID is uncertain.

In many of the markets where we may do business in the future, the prices of pharmaceutical
products are subject to direct price controls pursuant to applicable law or regulation and to drug reimbursement programs with varying price control mechanisms.

We expect that many of the patients who seek treatment with BiovaxID if approved for marketing will be eligible for Medicare benefits.
Other patients may be covered by private health plans or uninsured. The Medicare program is administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Coverage and reimbursement for products and services under Medicare are determined pursuant to regulations promulgated by CMS and pursuant to CMSs subregulatory coverage and reimbursement determinations. It is difficult to predict
how CMS may apply those regulations and subregulatory determinations to newly approved products, especially novel products such as ours, and those regulations and interpretive determinations are subject to change.

Moreover, the methodology under which CMS makes coverage and reimbursement determinations is subject to change, particularly because of budgetary
pressures facing the Medicare program. For example, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (the Medicare Modernization Act), enacted in December 2003, provides for a change in reimbursement methodology that
reduces the Medicare reimbursement rates for many drugs, including oncology therapeutics, which may adversely affect reimbursement for BiovaxID, if it is approved for sale. If we are unable to obtain or retain adequate levels of reimbursement
from Medicare or from private health plans, our ability to profitably sell BiovaxID will be adversely affected. Medicare regulations and interpretive determinations also may determine who may be reimbursed for certain services. This may
adversely affect our ability to profitably market or sell BiovaxID, if approved.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Federal, state and foreign governments continue to propose legislation designed to contain or reduce health
care costs. Legislation and regulations affecting the pricing of products like our potential products may change further or be adopted before BiovaxID is potentially approved for marketing. It is difficult to predict which, if any, of
these proposals will be enacted, and, if so, when. Cost control initiatives by governments or third party payers could decrease the price that we receive for any one or all of our potential products or increase patient coinsurance to a level that
makes BiovaxID unaffordable.

In addition, government and private health plans persistently challenge the price and cost-effectiveness of
therapeutic products. Accordingly, these third parties may ultimately not consider BiovaxID to be cost-effective, which could result in products not being covered under their health plans or covered only at a lower price. Any of these
initiatives or developments could prevent us from successfully marketing and selling any of our potential products on a profitable basis. We are unable to predict what impact the Medicare Modernization Act or other future regulation or third party
payer initiatives, if any, relating to reimbursement for BiovaxID will have on sales of BiovaxID, if approved for sale.

In the
European Union, governments influence the price of pharmaceutical products through their pricing and reimbursement rules and control of national health care systems that fund a large part of the cost of such products to consumers. The approach taken
varies from member state to member state. Some jurisdictions operate positive and/or negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a reimbursement price has been agreed. Other member states allow companies to fix their own
prices for medicines, but monitor and control company profits. The downward pressure on health care costs in general, particularly prescription drugs, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of
new products, as exemplified by the role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom which evaluates the data supporting new medicines and passes reimbursement recommendations to the government. In addition, in
some countries cross-border imports from low-priced markets (parallel imports) exert commercial pressure on pricing within a country. All of these factors could adversely impact our ability to successfully commercialize BiovaxID in these
jurisdictions.

Even if approved, BiovaxID may be subject to promotional limitations.

We may not be able to obtain the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the promotion of our products. The FDA has the authority to impose significant
restrictions on an approved product through the product label and allowed advertising, promotional and distribution activities. The FDA also may approve a product for fewer indications than are requested or may condition approval on the performance
of post-approval clinical studies. We may also be required to undertake post-marketing clinical trials. There may be monetary penalties if post-approval requirements are not fulfilled. If the results of such post-marketing studies are not
satisfactory, the FDA may withdraw marketing authorization or may condition continued marketing on commitments from us that may be expensive and/or time consuming to fulfill. Even if we receive FDA and other regulatory approvals, if we or others
identify adverse side effects after any of our products are on the market, or if manufacturing problems occur, regulatory approval may be withdrawn and reformulation of our products, additional clinical trials, changes in labeling of our products
and additional marketing applications may be required.

We have limited experience attempting to comply with public company obligations,
including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC
has adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the companys internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, the registered public accounting firm auditing a
public companys financial statements must attest to and report on managements assessment of the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting if certain criteria are met. The report of management is
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are not yet required to include the attestation report of our registered public accounting firm as we have not yet met the criteria triggering this requirement. If we are unable to conclude that we have
effective internal control over financial reporting, or if our independent auditors are unable to provide us with an unqualified report as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our securities.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets.

Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets as opposed to a larger or better accepted market. Thus, an investor might find it more difficult than it
would be on a national exchange to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, our securities. We cannot be certain that an active trading market will develop or, if developed, be sustained. We also cannot be certain that
purchasers of our common stock will be able to resell their common stock at prices equal to or greater than their purchase price. The development of a public market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends
upon the presence in the marketplace of a sufficient number of willing buyers and sellers at any given time. We do not have any control over whether there will be sufficient numbers of buyers and sellers. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that an
established and liquid market for our common stock will develop or be maintained. The market price of the common stock could experience significant fluctuations in response to our operating results and other factors. In addition, the stock market in
recent years has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies. These fluctuations, and general economic and market conditions, may hurt the
market price of our common stock.

We are also subject to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that, if we fail to meet certain criteria
set forth in such rule, the rule imposes various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities governed by the rule to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For these types of transactions, the
broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchasers written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, the rule may have an adverse effect on the ability of broker-dealers
to sell our securities and may affect the ability of our stockholders to buy and sell our securities in the secondary market. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in penny
stocks, which could reduce the liquidity of our common stock and have a material adverse effect on the trading market for our securities.

The price of our stock may be highly volatile.

The market price for our common stock is likely to fluctuate due to factors unique to us or arising out of the highly volatile market prices of securities
of biotechnology companies. Our shareholders may not be able to resell shares of our common stock following periods of volatility. In addition, our shareholders may not be able to resell shares at or above their purchase price.

Our stock price may be affected by many factors, many of which are outside of our control, which may include:



| |  |  | actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the results of clinical trials and preclinical studies involving our products or those of our competitors;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the status of any of our drug development programs, including delays in clinical trials or program terminations;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in our relationships with other collaborative partners;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in patent or other proprietary rights;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | governmental regulation;
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | public concern as to the safety and efficacy of products developed by us, our collaborators or our competitors;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to fund on-going operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | announcements of technological innovations or new products or services by us or our competitors;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | conditions or trends in the biotechnology industry; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other biotechnology companies.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Our principal stockholder is able to exert significant influence over matters submitted to stockholders
for approval.

As of September 30, 2009, Accentia owned a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock. Accentia exerts
significant influence in determining the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval and that otherwise control our business. This control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us and, consequently,
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We may be unable to obtain necessary additional
financing.

The capital requirements for our operations have been and will continue to be significant. Our ability to
generate cash from operations is dependent upon, among other things, increased demand for our products and services and the successful development of direct marketing and product distribution capabilities. There can be no assurance that we will have
sufficient capital resources to implement our business plan and we may need additional external debt and/or equity financing to fund our future operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the funds necessary to
conduct future operations.

There may not be a market for our common Stock.

Upon demonstrating compliance with SEC financial reporting requirements, we will be eligible to list on the OTCQB marketplace which was launched in
April 2010, by Pink OTC Markets, Inc. to better distinguish OTC securities that are registered and reporting with U.S. regulators. However, our shares will not then be listed on the OTC Bulletin Board or any other trading market. In order for us to
qualify for listing on the OTC Bulletin Board, a market maker must complete and submit the appropriate applications to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for potential approval. There are no assurances that a market maker
will be willing to submit such an application or, if submitted, that FINRA will approve it. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that a holder of our common stock will be able to sell such securities in the future or as to the price at which such
securities might trade. The liquidity of the market for such securities and the prices at which such securities trade will depend upon the number of holders thereof, the interest of securities dealers in maintaining a market in such securities and
other factors beyond our control.

We have not been the subject of an independent valuation.

No investment banker or underwriter has been retained to value our common stock. We have not attempted to make any estimate of the prices at which our
common stock may trade in the market. Moreover, there can be no assurance given as to the market prices that will prevail.

Our
stockholders could suffer significant dilution upon the issuance of additional securities.

It is possible that we will need to
issue additional shares of common stock or securities or warrants convertible into such shares in order to raise additional equity. In such event, our stockholders could suffer significant dilution.

We have filed a Petition for Reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11

On November 10, 2008, we, along with our parent company, Accentia, filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the Bankruptcy Court). During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, we will operate our business as a
debtor in possession in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to successfully
restructure our indebtedness and to emerge from bankruptcy with a viable plan for reorganization (the Plan) and with adequate liquidity. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in formulating or filing an acceptable Plan, or that
any such Plan we do file with the Bankruptcy Court will be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court or successfully implemented by us.

We may not
be able to obtain confirmation of the Plan.

As a debtor seeking confirmation of our plan, we may not receive the requisite
acceptances from our creditors to confirm such Plan. If the requisite acceptances of our Plan are received, we intend to seek confirmation of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court. If the requisite acceptances of our Plan are not received, we may
nevertheless seek Confirmation of the Plan notwithstanding the existence of a dissenting class or classes of creditors. The Bankruptcy Court may confirm the Plan pursuant to the cramdown provisions of the Bankruptcy Code if the Plan
satisfies Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

To confirm a plan over the objection of a dissenting class, the Bankruptcy Court also must find that at
least one impaired class (which cannot be an insider class) has accepted the plan.

Even if the requisite acceptances of our
proposed Plan are received, the Bankruptcy Court is not obligated to confirm the Plan as proposed. A dissenting holder of a claim against us could challenge the balloting procedures as not being in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code, which could
mean that the results of the balloting may be invalid. If the Bankruptcy Court determined that the balloting procedures were appropriate and the results were valid, the Bankruptcy Court could still decline to confirm the Plan, if the Bankruptcy
Court found that any of the statutory requirements for confirmation had not been met.

If our Plan is not confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court:
(a) we may not be able to reorganize our businesses; (b) the distributions that holders of claims ultimately would receive, if any, with respect to their claims are uncertain; and (c) there is no assurance that we will be able to
successfully develop, prosecute, confirm, and consummate an alternative plan that will be acceptable to the Bankruptcy Court and the holders of claims. It is also possible that third parties may seek and obtain approval from the Bankruptcy Court to
terminate or shorten the exclusivity period during which only we may propose and confirm a plan of reorganization.

Our emergence from
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is not assured.

While we expect to emerge from Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, there can be no
assurance that we will successfully reorganize or when this reorganization will occur, irrespective of our obtaining confirmation of the Plan.

The conditions precedent to the effective date of the Plan may not occur.

As more fully set forth in the Plan we have filed with the Bankruptcy Court, the effective date of the Plan is subject to a number of conditions
precedent, including a final order of confirmation of our Plan, and the plan of our parent company, Accentia, by the Bankruptcy Court. If such conditions precedent are not met or waived, the Plan will not become effective.



|ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|-------- | -------------------------

None



|ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES
|------- | ----------

We lease approximately 35,000
square feet in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which we use for offices, a laboratory, manufacturing, warehousing areas to support the production of perfusion cell culture equipment, and contract cell culture services. This facility lease agreement has
expired and we continue to occupy this facility on a month-to-month basis with a long-term lease currently being negotiated which is expected to include improvements to the facility to provide a dedicated laboratory space for the production of
BiovaxID and potential future expansion to the facility to permit additional BiovaxID production capacity when required.

We leased approximately 17,000 square feet in Worcester, Massachusetts, which we used for
BiovaxID® production, contract cell production, offices, and storage. On December 8, 2008, the Bankruptcy
Court in our Chapter 11 proceeding entered an Order confirming the rejection of this Worcester lease, and we no longer occupy these premises.

We leased approximately 24,000 square feet in St. Louis, Missouri under a three year lease term which runs through January 2010. On December 1,
2008, we amended our lease in St. Louis, Missouri, which shortened the lease term to November 30, 2009 and decreased the leased premises to 10,000 square feet and on March 31, 2009, pursuant to the terms of the amended lease, we terminated
the lease.

We anticipate that our Minneapolis facility will meet our needs during fiscal 2010. We anticipate that as our development of
BiovaxID advances and as we prepare for the future commercialization of our products, our facilities requirements will increase.



|ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------

On November 10,
2008, we filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the Bankruptcy Court).
During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, we will operate our business as a debtor-in-possession in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court.

On August 4, 2008, we were served with a summons and complaint filed in California Superior Court on behalf of Clinstar LLC for breach of contract
for non-payment of certain fees for clinical trial studies and pass-through expenses in the amount of $385,000. We intend to seek to dismiss this litigation and plan to defend these claims vigorously. Upon the filing of our



32



---

##### Table of Contents

Chapter 11 petition on November 10, 2008, this litigation was automatically stayed pursuant to
provisions of federal bankruptcy law.

Except for the foregoing, we are not party to any material legal proceedings, and management is not
aware of any threatened legal proceedings that could cause a material adverse impact on our business, assets, or results of operations.

Further, from time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, some of which are covered by insurance.



|ITEM 4. | (Removed and Reserved)
|------- | ----------------------

PART II



|ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Market for Registrants Common Stock

On February 18, 2009, our stock opened for trading on the Pink Sheets under the symbol, BVTI.PK

Number of Common Shareholders

As of
September 30, 2009, we had approximately 97,550,000 shares of common stock outstanding which were held by approximately 400 stockholders of record.

Quarterly High / Low Company Stock Price  BVTI.PK

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the quarterly periods indicated as reported by
the OTC Bulletin Board and Pink Sheets. Bid quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.



|                               |  |      |      |     |   |     
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | ---- | --- | - | ----
|                               |  | High |      | Low
|Year Ended September 30, 2008: |  |      |      |     |   |     
|First Quarter                  |  | $    | 0.55 |     | $ | 0.32
|Second Quarter                 |  | $    | 0.69 |     | $ | 0.42
|Third Quarter                  |  | $    | 1.01 |     | $ | 0.34
|Fourth Quarter                 |  | $    | 0.51 |     | $ | 0.26
|                               |  |     
|Year Ended September 30, 2009: |  |      |      |     |   |     
|First Quarter                  |  | $    | 0.40 |     | $ | 0.03
|Second Quarter                 |  | $    | 0.13 |     | $ | 0.04
|Third Quarter                  |  | $    | 1.50 |     | $ | 0.10
|Fourth Quarter                 |  | $    | 0.75 |     | $ | 0.26

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that all
future earnings will be retained for use in our business. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, operating results and other factors.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

See Part III, Item 12 for information on our equity compensation plan.



|ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|------- | -----------------------

Not Applicable.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you read this section of this annual report, it is important that you also read the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this annual report. This section of this annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. We use words such as anticipate,
estimate, plan, project, continuing, ongoing, expect, believe, intend, may, will, should, could, and
similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the factors described below and in the Risk
Factors section of this Form 10-K.

Overview

As a result of our collaboration with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), we are developing
BiovaxID® as a personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine for the treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphoma,
specifically, follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and potentially other B-cell blood cancers. Both FL and MCL are generally considered to be incurable with currently approved therapies. This generally fatal disease arises from the
lymphoid tissue and are characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation and spread throughout the body of mature B-cells, which are a type of white blood cell.

Three clinical trials conducted under our Investigational New Drug Application (IND) have studied BiovaxID in non-Hodgkins lymphoma. These studies
include a Phase 2 clinical trial and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with FL as well as a Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL patients. We believe that these clinical trials have demonstrated that BiovaxID, which is personalized and autologous
(derived from a patients own tumor cells), has an excellent safety profile and is effective in the treatment of these lethal diseases. We are currently preparing for discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
international agencies regarding regulatory approvals of BiovaxID for FL and MCL based on these clinical trials. We expect BiovaxID may also have application in other forms of B-cell lymphomas.

To support our planned commercialization of BiovaxID, we developed an automated cell culture instrument called AutovaxID. We believe that AutovaxID
has significant potential application in the production of a broad range of patient-specific medicines, such as BiovaxID as well as other monoclonal antibodies. We are under contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to further develop AutovaxID
and to explore potential production of additional vaccines including vaccines for viral indications such as influenza. AutovaxID is automated and computer controlled to improve cell production reliability and to maximize cell production. AutovaxID
uses a disposable production unit which minimizes the need for FDA required clean rooms in the production process and provides for robust and dependable manufacturing while complying with the industry cGMP standards. AutovaxID has a
small footprint and supports scalable production.

We also manufacture instruments and disposables used in the hollow-fiber production of cell
culture products. Our hollow-fiber cell culture products and instruments are used by biopharmaceutical and biotech companies, medical schools, universities, research facilities, hospitals and public and private laboratories. We also produce
mammalian and insect cells, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant and secreted proteins and other cell culture products using our unique capability, expertise and proprietary advancements in the cell production process known as hollow-fiber perfusion.

Our business consists of three primary business segments: development of BiovaxID and potentially other B-cell blood cancer vaccines; the
manufacture and sale of AutovaxID and other instruments and consumables; and commercial production of cell culture products and services.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Background

The following describes our history:

We were
incorporated in Minnesota in 1981, under the name Endotronics, Inc. In 1993, our name was changed to Cellex Biosciences, Inc. and in 1998, we entered a bankruptcy proceeding which, in July 1999, was concluded with the confirmation of our
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. As of July 31, 1999, we adopted fresh start reporting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Fresh-start reporting resulted in material changes to our balance sheet, including valuation
of assets at fair value in accordance with principles of the purchase method of accounting, valuation of liabilities pursuant to provisions of the Plan and valuation of equity based on the reorganization value of the ongoing business.

In May 2000, we acquired the assets of Unisyn Technologies, Inc., a competitor in hollow-fiber perfusion, for a combination of shares of our stock and
our assumption of certain Unisyn debts and obligations. This acquisition provided us with additional expertise and proprietary advancements in the hollow-fiber perfusion process and expanded our cell culture production capability.

In September 2001, we entered into the CRADA with the NCI, for the development and ultimate commercialization of
patient-specific vaccines for the treatment of non-Hodgkins low-grade follicular lymphoma, which we call
BiovaxID®, the IND and all responsibility for the ongoing clinical trials for BiovaxID from NCI to us until
2004. The CRADA was terminated in December 2006 and we continue to collaborate with the NCI.

In 2001, we changed our corporate name to
Biovest International, Inc. and changed our state of incorporation from Minnesota to Delaware. In April 2003, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a Florida corporation (Accentia). As a result
of this agreement, in June 2003, we became a subsidiary of Accentia through the sale of shares of our authorized but un-issued common and preferred stock then representing approximately 81% of our equity outstanding immediately after the investment.
The aggregate investment commitment received from Accentia was $20 million. We continued to be a reporting company under Section 12G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 following the investment of Accentia.

In August 2004, we entered into a Biologics Products Commercialization Agreement with Accentia whereby Accentia was to be our exclusive commercialization
partner for the vaccine we are currently developing and any other similar products developed or acquired by us. Under that agreement, Accentia was entitled to 49% of our net profits from the sale of biologic products. On October 31, 2006, we
entered into a Royalty Agreement with Accentia that terminated and superseded the Biologics Products Commercialization Agreement. The new Royalty Agreement provides that Accentia is no longer our exclusive commercialization partner and replaces the
share of net profits with a 19.5% royalty based on net sales and license revenue of biologics products. The products and territory subject to the Royalty Agreement remain identical to those terms previously contained in the Biologics
Commercialization Agreement. In consideration for Accentia entering into this Royalty Agreement, we issued to Accentia five million shares of our common stock, representing the independently appraised value to us of the new agreement.

On April 25, 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Biovax, Inc. (Biovax) was the recipient of a financing under a qualified New Markets Tax
Credit (NMTC) Program that was provided for in the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000. Biovax is located in a qualified, active low-income census tract and is eligible to receive investment capital under the NMTC. The NMTC
investments were made through Telesis CDE II, LLC, a Community Development Entity (CDE) qualified for this purpose through the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

On August 7, 2006, we formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary corporation, AutovaxID, Inc. (AutovaxID), which is incorporated in the State
of Florida and is additionally qualified to do business in the states of Minnesota and Missouri. We anticipate that this subsidiary will be used to conduct the business of manufacturing and commercially distributing our AutovaxID instruments.
On December 8, 2006, AutovaxID became the recipient of a financing pursuant to the NMTC program based on a tax credit allocation from the City of St. Louis, Missouri, and entered into a lease for a facility in order to commence operations for
the assembly, marketing and distribution of the AutovaxID instrument and cultureware. The NMTC investments were made through St. Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II, LLC, a CDE qualified for this purpose through the U.S. Department of the
Treasury.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

We have completed our Phase 3 clinical trial; therefore, we have shifted the regulatory strategy of our
Phase 3 clinical trial of BiovaxID away from the enrollment and treatment of new patients to the analysis of the data that has been collected, which includes patients who received treatment in the clinical trial more than nine years ago and the
pursuit of regulatory approval of BiovaxID. As a result of current regulatory strategy, we have reduced the costs, including personnel, administrative and facilities currently associated with the clinical trials. Upon completion of the regulatory
process, we will re-assess the staff and facilities that are appropriate as we continue to pursue the FDA approval and commercial distribution of BiovaxID.

On April 17, 2007, we executed an amendment agreement with our senior lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd (Laurus), whereby we issued to
Laurus a right to a minimum royalty stream on AutovaxID instrument sales. In return for this royalty we were granted forbearance on past due principal and interest payments due on our promissory note dated March 31, 2006. Additionally, the
future principal and interest payments that we had been required to make were rescheduled. On October 31, 2007, we entered into a forbearance agreement with Laurus confirming that no event of default existed under the March 2006 note, and
deferred all payments of principal and interest due for the period of March 2007 through December 31, 2007 until the earlier of a closing of a financing with defined level of proceeds or March 31, 2008. As consideration for this
forbearance, we were required to pay $1.8 million to Laurus on March 31, 2008. On December 10, 2007 we closed two financing transactions with Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (collectively, the
Valens Funds), the Valens Funds being subsidiaries of Laurus. Pursuant to the December transaction, the Valens Funds purchased from us two secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $8.5 million and entered
into two royalty agreements whereby the Valens Funds have been granted 7.0% royalty interests in the worldwide net sales and license revenues from commercial sales of our biologic products. Proceeds from the December transaction, after designated
payments to the Valens Funds and Laurus in payment of outstanding obligations and prepayment of certain scheduled principal and interest payments, were disbursed into a restricted account and later released for our use based upon an agreed schedule.
The net proceeds were used to support the planned interim analysis of the clinical data from the Phase 3 clinical trial for our anti cancer vaccine, BiovaxID, and for general working capital.

Effective as of May 30, 2008, we entered into an agreement with the Valens Funds whereby the Valens Funds agreed to extend the maturity date of the
secured promissory notes from the from their initial maturity date of June 10, 2008 to October 31, 2008 (the Extension). In consideration for the Extension, we entered into an amendment to the December 2007 Royalty Agreement
with the Valens Funds (the Royalty Amendment) whereby the total royalty percentage due to the Valens Funds was increased from 9.0% to 15.5%.

On July 31, 2008, we again extended the maturity date of all debt outstanding to Laurus and the Valens Funds. This included total debt in the
principal amount of $14.6 million consisting of the remaining principal outstanding on: 1) the $7.8 million note closed in March 2006; 2) the $0.5 million notes closed in October 2007; and 3) the $8.5 million notes closed in December 2007. Under the
terms of the restructuring, maturities of all the notes were extended to July 31, 2009, and will carry no amortizing payments until maturity. Interest on all principal outstanding was amended to 30% per annum, with 10% payable monthly and
20% accruing and payable at maturity. We also agreed to pay an additional $4.4 million fee on the notes, payable at maturity.

On November 10, 2008, we filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11. The reorganization cases are being
jointly administered with our parent company, Accentia under Case No. 8:08-bk-17795-KRM (the Chapter 11). We will continue to operate as a debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. With existing cash flow and the potential for relatively near-term significant business development opportunities for
BiovaxID® and AutovaxID, this action is intended to provide us an opportunity to restore shareholder value
and to pay all secured and unsecured creditors. Under protection of the Bankruptcy Court, we plan to implement a series of initiatives designed to significantly decrease operating expenses and financing costs, and focus cash and resources on
priority programs that will allow us to attract key funding/partnering opportunities. The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern once we emerge from Chapter 11. Our
ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to successfully restructure our indebtedness and to emerge from bankruptcy with a viable plan for reorganization and with adequate liquidity. We believe the
Chapter 11 reorganization will achieve these objectives. During this reorganization process, we expect to continue operations without interruption, while striving to maximize long-term shareholder value.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, we incurred significant negative cash flows and operating
losses primarily as a result of our operations and continuing development activities regarding our vaccine. We expect negative operating cash flow to continue through and potentially beyond fiscal year 2010, due to budgeted costs associated with our
ongoing vaccine development activities and related research, development, and activities related to our interim analysis. We anticipate further losses in fiscal 2010, which we anticipate will be funded by a combination of positive operating margins
from our instrument sales and cell culture production operations, draws on our debtor-in-possession financing facility, the sale of equity or debt securities, strategic collaborations, potential licenses both domestic and foreign, and recognized
research funding programs. Although we are currently exploring various financing alternatives, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in securing such financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available from
the foregoing sources, or if we determine it to be in our best interest, we may consider additional strategic financing options, including sales of assets or business units that are non-essential to the ongoing development or future
commercialization of BiovaxID and AutovaxID, or we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or curtail our commercialization efforts.

Our 2009 consolidated financial statements include our wholly-owned subsidiaries Biovax, Inc., AutovaxID, Inc., Biolender, LLC and Biolender II, LLC, and
due to our controlling financial interest, certain variable interest entities, Biovax Investment LLC, Telesis CDE Two LLC, AutovaxID Investment, LLC, and St. Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund-II, LLC.

Results of Operations

Year Ended
September 30, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended September 30, 2008

Revenue. Total revenues for the year ended
September 30, 2009 were $3.7 million, compared to revenues of $5.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. Sales from our instrumentation segment experienced a decrease of $1.1 million year over year, due mainly to a decrease in
unit sales of our disposable units used in our hollow-fiber production instrumentation. Service revenue decreased $484,000 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year due to three significant cell culture contracts that were ongoing in
fiscal 2008. These projects were run to completion prior to the start of fiscal 2009.

Gross Margin. The overall gross margin as
a percentage of sales for the year ended September 30, 2009 decreased from 44% to 33% when compared to fiscal 2008. While revenues were down in both our cell culture and instrumentation segments, as discussed above, there was not a
corresponding decrease in cost of sales as a relatively high percentage of costs are of a fixed nature.

Operating Costs and
Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased by $2.5 million or 70% for the year ended September 30, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. As we are conducting detailed analyses of the available trial data and may seek conditional
approval with the FDA and EMEA as discussed below, coupled with the limited financing available to us, we have focused on reducing our R&D expenses from that of historical levels. This has resulted in both R&D staffing levels as well as the
number of sites participating in our clinical trials to have declined considerably. Furthermore, through our voluntary petition for reorganization, we were able to reject the operating lease on our research and development facility in Worcester,
Massachusetts on December 8, 2008.

General and administrative expenses decreased $2.7 million or 48% in the current fiscal year, due in
large part to a non-cash charge for compensation issued to employees in the form of stock options in the previous fiscal year. There was no comparable expense in fiscal 2009. Also, on December 1, 2008, we amended our operating lease on our
manufacturing facility in St. Louis, Missouri, which shortened the lease term to November 30. 2009 and decreased the lease premises to 10,000 square feet and on March 31, 2009, pursuant to the terms of the amended lease, we terminated the
lease, resulting in a decrease in facility and personnel costs in the current year.

Other Income and Expense. Other expense for the
year ended September 30, 2009, includes contractual interest charges and amortization of discounts regarding the Laurus and the Valens Funds financings, interest on our debtor-in-possession loan from Corps Real, LLC, (Corps Real)
interest on our demand notes to Accentia, interest on our unsecured promissory notes to Pulaski Bank and Trust Company of St. Louis, MO (Pulaski Bank) and Southwest Bank of St. Louis (Southwest Bank), as well as interest on
other long-term debt and short-term loans from affiliates. Total interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $6.9 million and $7.9 million respectively. In the previous fiscal year, we recorded a charge of
approximately $3.0 million associated with warrants issued to guarantee our debt. Removing this one-time charge, interest expense has increased by approximately $2.0 million year over year. As our total indebtedness has increased over the
two years presented, so have our contractual interest and amortization charges. We have continued to accrue interest on all our outstanding obligations at the contractual rate while in Chapter 11. These terms are subject to compromise through our
plan of reorganization.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

Other expense for the previous fiscal year includes a $6.6 million loss incurred upon extinguishment of debt
as the result of our modification of certain provisions of our notes payable to Laurus and Pulaski Bank. As a result of our voluntary petition for reorganization, filed November 10, 2008, this debt has become prepetition indebtedness as of
September 30, 2009, and is subject to compromise through our Chapter 11 proceedings.

Certain of the financing transactions into which we
have entered embody provisions which meet the definition of derivative financial instruments and require bifurcation under current generally accepted accounting principles. We have recorded the fair value of these provisions as derivative
liabilities. We use various techniques to estimate the fair value of these liabilities each reporting period, including Black Scholes Merton analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, and probability based, discounted cash flow estimates.

Other expense for the years ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 include losses of $1.0 million and $0.3 million on derivative liabilities
respectively. The current year loss results from outstanding warrants and conversion features associated with our secured convertible debentures issued in September, 2008. The value of these liabilities, vary directly with the trading price of our
outstanding common stock. The trading price of our common shares increased over the year ending September 30, 2009, resulting in a corresponding increase in the value of these liabilities. The prior years loss was attributable to a
default put feature on our notes payable to Laurus and the Valens Funds whereby, upon declaration of default, we would be required to make additional payments over and above the outstanding principal and interest due on the note. As a result of
modifications to our loan agreements with Laurus and the Valens Funds in July, 2008, this liability is no longer reflected in our financial statements as of September 30, 2009.

Other income of $387,000 for the year ended September 30, 2008 is primarily the result of non cash gains recorded from the settlement of various
professional fees below amounts previously accrued by us.

Reorganization Items

Gain on allowance for leasehold improvements net of settlement of administrative claim: In an effort to decrease operating expenses, on
December 8, 2008, through our Chapter 11 proceedings, we rejected our lease in Worcester, Massachusetts. At inception of this lease we were granted an allowance of approximately $120,000 for leasehold improvements, to be recorded against rent
expense over the term of the lease. At the time our lease was rejected an unamortized allowance of approximately $44,000 remained which was credited to gain on allowance for leasehold improvements on the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended September 30, 2009. Damages resulting from the rejection of this unexpired lease are treated by the bankruptcy code as general unsecured claims and are limited to either 15 percent of the balance of the rent reserved in the lease or
the rent reserved for one year from the filing date or the date the premises were surrendered, whichever is earlier. On July 17, 2009, we, through an approved order by the Bankruptcy Court, settled this claim for a one-time payment of $14,000
issued on September 15, 2009.

Professional Fees:Included in the current fiscal years results are expenses of $380,000 for
legal fees incurred as a result of our Chapter 11 proceedings.

Provision for indemnity agreements: The notes we issued to Pulaski Bank
and Southwest Bank are guaranteed by individuals affiliated with us, or our parent company Accentia. We agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each guarantor should their guarantees be called by the lenders. In addition, in the event we default,
resulting in a payment to the lenders by the guarantors, we agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by issuing shares of our restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10. On December 29, 2008,
Pulaski Bank called the guarantees resulting in an aggregate payment of $1.0 million by the guarantors. In January 2009, Southwest Bank called its guarantee resulting in an aggregate payment of $0.2 million by the guarantor. As a result of
their indemnification agreements, the guarantors are allowed an unsecured claim for approximately 7.6 million shares of our common stock having a fair value of $3.9 million as of September 30, 2009.

Non-Controlling interest in earnings from variable interest entities. Our statement of operations for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008
includes a $455,000 and $496,000 non-controlling interest in the losses of the variable interest entities resulting from the consolidation of a number of variable interests formed as a result of the NMTC transactions further discussed below.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically had significant losses from operations and these losses continued during the year ended September 30, 2009
resulting in a net operating cash flow deficit of $1.9 million. At September 30, 2009, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $132.0 million and working capital deficit of approximately $55.2 million including those liabilities subject
to compromise through our Chapter 11 proceedings. We will attempt to meet our cash requirements through proceeds from our cell culture and instrument manufacturing activities, the use of cash on hand, trade-vendor credit, restructuring of our
outstanding debt obligations through the Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, and short-term borrowings. Additionally, upon the completion of the detailed analyses of our clinical trial, we may seek public or private equity investment, short or
long term debt financing or strategic relationships such as investments or licensees. Accordingly, our ability to continue present operations, pay our existing liabilities as they become due, and continue our ongoing product development is dependent
upon our ability to successfully complete the Chapter 11 Reorganization process and to obtain significant external funding from sources other than Accentia in the very near term, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern. The need for funds is expected to grow as we continue the evaluation of our clinical trials results and our efforts to commercialize both
BiovaxID® and AutovaxID.

Debtor-in-Possession Note.

On
December 22, 2008, we completed the closing of a debtor-in-possession financing transaction (the DIP Transaction) with Corps Real, its principal owners are our directors (the DIP Lender). Pursuant to the transaction, the
DIP Lender provided a secured line of credit in an amount of up to $3.0 million in accordance with an order entered by the Bankruptcy Court. As of September 30, 2009, the DIP Lender had advanced $1.25 million under the line of credit.

The DIP Transaction was memorialized by a Secured Promissory Note (the DIP Note) and Security Agreement dated
December 22, 2008. The following describes certain material terms of the DIP Transaction:



| |  |  | Principal Amount- Up to $3.0 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | Priority and Security- The Facility is a secured super-priority loan to a Debtor-in-Possession and is secured by all of our assets and is senior
to all prior and existing liens ours.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Advances under the Facility- For all amounts in excess of $1.0 million, we shall, along with Lender within 30 days of the entry of the
Initial Order agree on a list of milestone events to be achieved by us through use of these Advances, and we shall be required to make a written request(s) detailing the amount and use and Lender shall in its reasonable discretion
approve or reject the written request based upon whether we demonstrate reasonable progress in achieving the agreed milestones.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Term- All loans outstanding under the Facility (the Loans)shall become due and payable on the earlier of:
(i) December 31, 2010; (ii) dismissal of the Chapter 11 proceeding; (iii) conversion of the Chapter 11 proceeding to a Chapter 7 proceeding; or (iv) confirmation of our Plan of Reorganization.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Interest- Loans will bear interest at 16% per annum computed on a daily basis based on the principal amount outstanding. Interest shall be
paid as follows: (i) 10% interest shall be paid monthly and (ii) 6% interest shall accrue and be paid at maturity.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Points- At the Closing, we paid in cash 4% of the initial $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that we borrow in excess of $1.0
million, we shall pay in cash 4% of the second $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that we borrow in excess of $2.0 million, we shall pay in cash 4% of the third $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000).
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Expenses-We made payment of $25,000 in costs at the Closing.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Prepayment- Loans may be prepaid at any time in an amount of $50,000 or multiples of $50,000 in excess thereof, provided, however, that our
senior secured lender (Laurus and the Valens Funds) provides its consent to each prepayment via written notification to us and Lender.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Additional Future Funding Sources.

Additional sources of funding have not been established; however, additional financing is currently being sought by us from a number of sources, including
the sale of equity or debt securities, strategic collaborations, recognized research funding programs, as well as domestic and/or foreign licensing of our vaccine. Management is currently in the process of exploring various financing alternatives.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing such financing at acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available from the foregoing sources in the near term, or if we determine it to otherwise be in our best
interest, we may consider additional strategic financing options, including sales of assets or business units that are non-essential to the ongoing development or future commercialization of BiovaxID and AutovaxID, or we may be required to
delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its research or development programs or curtail some or all of its commercialization efforts.

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities. During the year ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a net loss of $14.7 million. Included in
this loss are several non-cash transactions, described as follows:



| |  |  | Interest charges resulting from amortization of discounts on outstanding debt in the amount of $1.5 million
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A loss on the write-off of leasehold improvements made to our facility in St. Louis, Missouri in the amount of $0.3 million. On December 1,
2008, we amended our operating lease on our manufacturing facility in St. Louis, Missouri, which shortened the lease term to November 30. 2009 and decreased the lease premises to 10,000 square feet and on March 31, 2009, pursuant to the
terms of the amended lease, we terminated the lease
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | An expense $3.9 million was recorded relating to indemnity agreements outstanding with guarantors of our debt with Pulaski Bank and Southwest Bank
further discussed under reorganization items above.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | An increase of $5.9 million in the balance of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, predominantly due to an increase in accrued interest on
outstanding debt. Although all interest payments on our prepetition debt have been stayed through our Chapter 11 proceedings, we have continued to accrue interest at the contractual rate on our obligations. These amounts may be subject to compromise
through our plan for reorganization.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adjusting our net loss for these and other non-cash items resulted in a net cash
deficit from operating activities in the amount of $1.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2009.

Net Cash Flows from
Investing Activities. There were no cash flows from investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of a transaction with the Valens Funds dated December 10, 2007, approximately $3.3 million was
deposited into a restricted bank account for our use for the year ended September 30, 2008. The full amount was released from restriction for the year ended September 30, 2008 and used for general operating and research and development
expenditures.

Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities. In December 2008, we closed a DIP Note as discussed above. Draws in the DIP
Note amounted to $1.25 million for fiscal 2009. We also paid a total of $65,000 for fees and closing costs associated with the DIP Note. Our parent company, Accentia also advanced us a net of approximately $430,000 for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, predominantly in the form of accrued interest on prepetition indebtedness to Accentia which is subject to compromise through our reorganization proceedings. During fiscal 2008, approximately $8.7 million was generated by
financing activities. The cash generated resulted primarily from the notes issued to the Valens Funds on December 10, 2007, the note issued to one of our directors in the amount of $1.0 million on May 9, 2008, as well as advances by
Accentia consisting of cash loans, payments directly to third parties on our behalf, allocated inter-company expenses, and accrued interest.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

New Market Tax Credit Transactions.

April 2006 NMTC
Transaction1.

On April 25, 2006, our wholly owned subsidiary, Biovax, Inc. (Biovax) closed a financing transaction (Transaction I) that was
structured in an effort to obtain certain perceived advantages and enhancements from the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) regulations adopted under the auspices of the United States Department of the Treasury in 2002 to provide incentive
for investing in businesses located in qualifying census tracts, or areas with a median income below the poverty line. The NMTC was provided for in the Community Renewal Relief Act of 2000 (the Act) and permits taxpayers
(whether companies or individuals) to claim credits against their Federal income taxes for up to 39% of qualified investments in the equity of Community Development Entities (CDE). CDE are privately managed investment institutions that
are certified to make Qualified Low-Income Community Investments (QLICI). The following parties were involved in Transaction I: Accentia, our majority shareholder, Biolender, LLC (Biolender), Biovax Investment Corp.,
Biovax Investment, LLC (Fund), U.S. Bancorp Community Investment Corporation (US Bancorp), Telesis CDE Two, LLC (CDE), Telesis CDE Corporation, Biovax, and Laurus. Biovax is a qualified, active low-income
business and is eligible to receive investment capital under the NMTC regulations.

On March 31, 2006, in contemplation of Transaction I,
we closed a financing transaction with Laurus pursuant to which Laurus purchased from us a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $7.799 million (the Laurus Note). Accentia originally guaranteed 64% of any amounts outstanding
under the note. On May 30, 2008, this guaranty was modified to reflect a fixed principal amount of $5.0 million. Under the terms of the Laurus Note, $7.5 million of the principal amount was deposited into our restricted bank account (the
Restricted Account) pursuant to a restricted account agreement between ourselves and Laurus. Accentia, Analytica International, Inc. and Laurus also entered into an Amended and Restated Stock Pledge Agreement pledging Accentias
shares in our Company, TEAMM Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Analytica International, Inc., and Accentias membership interest in Biolender, LLC (Biolender) who was added as obligor by way of joinder, to secure the obligations owed to Laurus
as a result of the Laurus Note.

In contemplation of Transaction I, we, formed along with Accentia, Biolender, as a Delaware limited liability
company. On April 21, 2006, $2.5 million was released from the Restricted Account created under the Laurus Note. The release of these funds was contingent upon their use in Transaction I. These proceeds were used to purchase a 29.5%
equity investment in Biolender for $2.5 million. Accentia used the proceeds of a $6.0 million intraday loan from First Bank to purchase the remaining 70.5% equity interest in Biolender. The $6.0 million loan from First Bank was fully guaranteed
by two directors of Accentia. On April 27, 2006, we redeemed 10.0 million shares of common stock owned of record by Accentia for a $6.0 million cash payment which equaled the market price of $0.60 per share. Accentia used the proceeds
of the stock redemption to repay its intraday loan due First Bank. Subsequently, on October 31, 2006, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Accentia whereby, we purchased Accentias 70.5% ownership interest in Biolender. In
consideration of the sale of this interest in Biolender, we issued to Accentia 10.0 million shares of common stock, representing the negotiated value of the purchased interest.

In contemplation of Transaction I, Biovax Investment, LLC (the Fund) was established. U.S. Bancorp invested $3.6 million for a 99.99% equity
interest in the Fund. Biovax Investment Corp., the Fund manager, invested an additional $100 for the remaining 0.01% equity interest. On April 25, 2006, Biolender loaned the Fund $8.5 million pursuant to a 5.18%, annual rate, senior secured,
convertible note receivable, due October 27, 2013. Interest on the note is payable as follows: (i) 0.64% interest per annum, non-compounding, shall be payable on the first day of each calendar month until October 27, 2013; and
(ii) any remaining accrued and unpaid interest shall be payable in one installment on October 27, 2013. The note is convertible at the option of the fund into shares of our common stock near the maturity date.





|1 | In July 2010, we and certain of our affiliates entered into an agreement (the Worcester Restructuring Agreement) with Telesis CDE
Corporation and Telesis CDE Two, LLC (collectively, Telesis), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The Worcester Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties
pursuant to Transaction I, in consideration of retention by Telesis of an unsecured claim in our Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $0.3 million along with a settlement payment in the amount of $85,000 to defray certain legal and administrative
expenses incurred by Telesis. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, our Guaranty, the Guaranty by our parent, Accentia, and all of our subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all other obligations to all parties to Transaction I
will be terminated.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



42



---

##### Table of Contents

The proceeds received by the Fund from the aforementioned financing transactions were used to make a
contemporaneous 99.99% equity investment in Telesis CDE II, LLC ($12.0 million) as well as make payment for associated management, legal and accounting fees ($0.1 million). The $12.0 million investment by the Fund to the CDE constituted a qualified
equity investment (QEI) under the NMTC Program authorized by Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), resulting in $4.7 million in tax credits.

The CDE is a Community Development Entity that is certified through the U.S. Treasury Department to make QLICI, and is managed and partially owned
(0.01%) by Telesis CDE Corporation, a private financial institution. Telesis CDE Corporation paid $1,200 in consideration for its 0.01% interest in Telesis. The CDE, upon receipt of its equity funding, contemporaneously issued $11.5 million to
Biovax for a 1.0% convertible promissory note payable, due October 27, 2013(the CDE Loan). The convertible promissory note is convertible into common stock at the option of the CDE within five days of the maturity date at a
conversion price equaling the then trading market price of the common stock. The overall arrangement provides that in the event the CDE converts the note payable, the aforementioned note receivable is subject to immediate conversion at the same
conversion price. We also issued to Telesis CDE Corporation warrants to purchase 1.2 million shares of our common stock over a period of nine-years at a fixed price of $1.30. These warrants are reflected as an equity financing cost in
stockholders equity at a fair value of $517,000 computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Accentia also issued warrants to Telesis CDE Corporation to purchase 0.2 million shares of Accentias common stock over a period
of seven years at a fixed price of $9.00.

Biovax used the proceeds of the $11.5 million convertible promissory note as follows: $6.0 million
was paid to us pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 18, 2006, and described further below, $1.6 million was issued as a dividend to us and $1.3 million was paid to us for the BiovaxID vaccines in various stages of
production. The remaining $2.6 million was used to cover ongoing operational expenses.

The transaction was structured so that, upon
maturity, Biovax will have paid approximately $12.4 million in principal and interest payments to the CDE. The operating agreement of the CDE stipulates that in the event the QLICI is repaid in the combination of stock and cash, the stock received
shall be distributed to the Fund. Furthermore, any distributable cash received by Telesis CDE II, LLC shall be distributed to the Fund in proportion to the Funds respective percentage interest in the CDE in an amount sufficient to fully pay
the Funds note payable to Biolender. Upon maturity, the Fund will have paid approximately $11.9 million in principal and interest payments to Biolender. At maturity, total equity of the Fund is approximated to be $0.1 million resulting from
the difference of $12.4 million in principal and interest payments received less $11.9 million in principal and interest paid less approximately $0.4 million in estimated operating costs of the Fund over the 7.5 year term of the notes. Biolender and
US Bancorp entered into a put option wherein US Bancorp will have the right to put its investment in the Fund to us near the maturity of the instruments at a price of $0.18 million. Management has concluded that the fair value of US Bancorps
investment in the Fund at maturity of both notes (approximately $0.1 million) would be less than the $0.18 million US Bancorp would receive upon exercise of the put option and thus it is managements expectation that this option will be
exercised. Thus, prior to maturity of both notes, it is anticipated that the Fund will be 99.99% owned by Biolender. We accounted for this option as a derivative liability that requires recognition at fair value. We utilized a probability-based,
discounted cash flow approach to value the put. Accordingly, the valuation technique provided for the recognition of the full put amount ($0.18 million) at the present value of its cash flows, using market interest rates that would likely be
considered by market participants trading similar instruments.

Salient terms and conditions of Transaction I are as follows:



| |  |  | Under an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 18, 2006 (Asset Purchase Agreement), we transferred all or substantially
all of the assets of our vaccine manufacturing business situated at 377 Plantation Street, Worcester, Massachusetts (the Plant and the assets hereinafter the Equipment) and our rights under that certain lease agreement
for the Plant and that certain letter of intent with the landlord to potentially lease additional space adjacent to the Plant (collectively the Leasehold) to Biovax. As full purchase price for the Equipment, Biovax paid us $1.5 million.
In addition, Biovax advanced rental payments for the Leasehold in the amount of $4.5 million. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we were required to treat the advance as unrestricted and non-segregated funds provided that we use the funds to make
all required lease payments. Finally, Biovax also hired all of our employees that are related to the vaccine manufacturing business and assumed responsibility for all accrued vacation time and the maintenance of existing health and other benefits.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



43



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | The tax credits arising from this transaction were fully assigned to US Bancorp. Biovax entered into an indemnification agreement directly with US
Bancorp that provides for indemnification in the event of tax credit recapture from events caused by Biovax. Biovax is contractually required to maintain the following covenants to avoid tax credit recapture: (i) Biovax shall maintain its
status as a qualified active low-income business; (ii) at least fifty percent of the use of the tangible property of the Biovax (whether owned or leased) will be within the low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax
Code; (iii) at least fifty percent of the services performed for Biovax by its employees will be within low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax Code; (iv) less than five percent of the average of the
unadjusted bases of the property of Biovax will be attributable to collectibles (as defined in Section 408(m)(2) of the Code, and which includes any work of art; any rug or antique; any metal or gem; any stamp or coin; and any alcoholic
beverage) other than collectibles that are held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business; (v) less than five percent of the average of the unadjusted bases of the property of Biovax will be attributable to nonqualified
financial property (as defined in Section 1397C(e) of the Code and in Section 1.45D-1(d)(4)(i)(E) of the Regulations, and which includes debt, stock, partnership interests, options, futures contracts, forward contracts, warrants, notional
principal contracts, annuities and other similar property); (vi) no part of the business activities of Biovax will consist of the operation of any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, hot tub facility, or suntan
facility, race track or other facility used for gambling, or store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; (vii) no part of Biovaxs business activities will include the rental to
others of residential rental property (the term residential rental property is defined in Section 168(e)(2)(A) of the Code as meaning any building or structure if eighty percent or more of the gross rental income from such building
or structure for the taxable year is rental income from dwelling units); (viii) The predominant trade or business of Biovax will not include the development or holding of intangibles for sale or license, as provided under
Section 1.45D-1(d)(5)(iii) of the Regulations; (ix) Farming (within the meaning of Section 2032A(e)(5)(A) or (B) of the Code) will not be an activity of Biovax; (x) Biovax will generate revenues by the date of April 25,
2009; (xi) Biovax shall not discontinue conducting business, shall not materially change the nature of its business, and shall not materially change the manner in which its business activities are conducted, other than changes in the nature of
its business or the manner in which it conducts its business that do not cause the making of the Loan by the Lender to cease to constitute a qualified low-income community investment as such term is used in Section 45D of the Code
(as determined by the Lender in its good faith judgment and based upon the advice of counsel); (xii) Biovax will not be a bank, credit union or other financial institution; (xiii) Biovax will not maintain a qualified low-income building
under Section 42 of the Code; (xiv) Biovax will not become a single-member entity treated as disregarded as separate from its owner for federal income tax purposes, nor be liquidated or merged into another entity without the written
consent of Telesis CDE II, LLC; and (xv) we, along with Biovax, will operate consistently with the Asset Purchase Agreement between us and Biovax, and will not amend such agreement without prior written consent of Telesis CDE II, LLC. An
example of an event that would not cause a recapture is changes in the Internal Revenue Code that results in such recapture. The total indemnification amount could be $4.7 million (representing 39% of the $12.0 million qualified investment).
However, in accordance with Financial Interpretation 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, the conditions and events that could result in recapture are
within the control of Biovax. Therefore, this potential liability is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | We, along with, Accentia and certain member of our board of directors and Accentias board of directors, entered into a guarantee arrangement with
the CDE for the debt service of Biovax. We have guaranteed 100% of the debt service while our directors and Accentias directors have guaranteed up to $6.0 million of the debt service. In addition, Accentia has partially guaranteed debt service
with limitations established at no greater than $60,000 each year the instrument is outstanding. We issued warrants to purchase 1.0 million shares of common stock to the officers and directors as compensation for their guarantees. The
guarantees were treated in a manner similar to contributed service and their fair value of $460,000 was charged to expense upon issuance. We also indemnified the guarantors from any claims of any kind to the extent that the guarantors are called
upon to pledge funds, assets or collateral in connection with the guarantee being executed.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



44



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Various legal and accounting fees of $108,000 paid directly by Biovax and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded as a reduction to
additional paid-in capital. Various legal and accounting fees of $170,000 paid by entities in which we have a variable interest and involved in structuring this transaction (the Fund and the CDE) were recorded as a reduction to non-controlling
interests in variable interest entities on our consolidated balance sheet. Professional fees of $360,000 involved in the continuing management of this transaction were recorded as a prepaid expense and will be amortized over a period of seven and
one half years, representing the duration of both convertible notes issued by the Fund and Biovax.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 2006 NMTC
Transaction2

On December 8, 2006, through our wholly owned subsidiary, AutovaxID, Inc. (AutovaxID), we closed a second NMTC financing transaction
(Transaction II). The following parties were involved in Transaction II: AutovaxID, Accentia, Biolender II, LLC (Biolender II), St. Louis New Market Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (CDE II), St. Louis Development
Corp., AutovaxID Investment LLC (Fund II), U.S. Bancorp, and Laurus.

On December 8, 2006, Accentia loaned to us $3.1 million
pursuant to a Secured Promissory Note (the Accentia Note). Under the terms of the Accentia Note, interest accrues at a rate equal to prime rate, and is convertible, at Accentias option, to shares of our common stock at a conversion
price of $0.32 per share. Upon closing of Transaction II, we repaid Accentia $1.1 million. The remaining $2.0 million of principal and all accrued and unpaid interest is included in notes payable, related parties in the accompanying
September 30, 2008 consolidated balance sheet, and is due upon 30 days advance written notice by Accentia.

In contemplation of
Transaction II, we formed Biolender II as a Delaware limited liability company. On December 8, 2006, $2.5 million was released from the Restricted Account created under the Laurus Note. The release of these funds was contingent upon their use
in Transaction II. These funds, together with the amount loaned to us under the Accentia Note funded the purchase of a 100% equity interest in Biolender II for our benefit. Our entire equity interest of $5.6 million in Biolender II has been pledged
to Laurus as collateral to secure the Laurus Note.

In contemplation of Transaction II, Fund II was established. U.S. Bancorp invested $2.4
million for a 100% equity interest in Fund II. Additionally, Biolender II and Fund II entered into a Loan and Security Agreement pursuant to which Biolender II made a loan to Fund II in the principal amount of $5.6 million (the Leverage
Loan), evidenced by a promissory note dated December 8, 2006 payable from Fund II to Biolender II (the Leverage Note). The Leverage Note becomes due on June 9, 2014, and bears an interest rate of 8.0%, non-compounding.
Payment of interest is due annually on the first calendar day of each year through maturity. The outstanding principal amount on the Leverage Loan and any unpaid interest is due on maturity in cash.

The proceeds received by Fund II from U.S. Bancorp and Biolender II were used to make a contemporaneous 99.99% equity investment in CDE II. The $8.0
million investment by Fund II to CDE II constituted a qualified equity investment (QEI) under the New Markets Tax Credit Program authorized by Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, resulting in
$3.12 million in tax credits which were allocated to U.S. Bancorp. All of Fund II interest in CDE II has been pledged to Biolender II as collateral for the Leverage Loan.





|2 | In July 2010, we and certain of our affiliates entered into an agreement (the St. Louis Restructuring Agreement) with St. Louis Development
Corporation and Saint Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (collectively SLDC), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The St. Louis Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and
obligations of all parties pursuant to Transaction II, in consideration of retention by SLDC of an unsecured claim in our Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $160,000 along with a settlement payment in the amount of $62,000, to defray certain
legal and administrative expenses incurred by SLDC. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, our Guaranty, the Guaranty by our parent, Accentia, and all of our subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all other obligations to all
parties to Transaction II will be terminated.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



45



---

##### Table of Contents

CDE II is a Community Development Entity (CDE) that is certified through the U.S. Treasury
Department to make QLICI, and is managed and partially owned (0.01%) by St. Louis Development Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation organized in Missouri. St. Louis Development Corporation paid $1,000 in consideration for its 0.01% interest in
CDE II. CDE II, upon receipt of its equity funding, contemporaneously issued a QLICI to AutovaxID, evidenced by a $7.7 million subordinated promissory note dated as of December 8, 2006 which matures on December 8, 2036(the CDE
II Loan). Pursuant to a call right, for a period of six months starting on December 8, 2013, the CDE will have the right to call for the repayment of the CDE II Loan in the amount of $5.7 million, in full satisfaction of the principal on
the CDE II Loan. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the CDE II Loan accrues at the rate of 5.82% per annum, non-compounding and is payable in arrears on an annual basis having commenced on January 2, 2007 and continuing until
maturity. The CDE II Loan is guaranteed in full by us and also guaranteed up to an amount of $4.5 million by officers and directors of Accentia. We issued warrants to purchase 2.6 million shares of common stock to these officers and directors
as compensation for their guarantees. The guarantees were treated in a manner similar to contributed service and their fair value of $1.4 million was charged to expense upon issuance. We also indemnified the guarantors from any claims of any kind to
the extent that the guarantors are called upon to pledge funds, assets or collateral in connection with the guarantee being executed.

AutovaxID used the proceeds from the $7.7 million promissory note to pay our $6.1 million pursuant to an Asset Purchase and License Agreement dated
December 8, 2006 and described further below. The remaining $1.6 million was used to cover ongoing operational expenses of AutovaxID.

Transaction II was structured so that, on June 9, 2014, AutovaxID will have paid approximately $9.1 million in principal and interest payments to
CDE II. The operating agreement of CDE II stipulates that any distributable cash received shall be distributed to Fund II in proportion to the respective percentage interest Fund II has in CDE II in an amount sufficient to fully pay the Fund II note
payable to Biolender II. On June 9, 2014, Fund II will have paid approximately $9.0 million in principal and interest payments to Biolender II (assuming CDE II exercises its right to call the CDE II loan for $5.7 million on June 9, 2014).
At maturity then, total equity of the Fund is approximated to be $0.1 million, resulting from the difference of $9.1 million in principal and interest payments received less $9.0 million in principal and interest paid over the 7.5 year term of
the notes.

Biolender II and US Bancorp entered into a put option wherein US Bancorp will have the right to put its investment in Fund II
to us near the maturity of the instruments at a price of $0.12 million. Management has concluded that the fair value of US Bancorps investment in Fund II at maturity of both notes (approximately $0.1 million) would be less than the
$0.12 million US Bancorp would receive upon exercise of the put option and thus it is managements expectation that this option will be exercised. Thus, prior to maturity of both notes, it is anticipated that the Fund will be 100% owned by
Biolender II. We accounted for this option as a derivative liability that requires recognition at fair value. We utilized a probability-based, discounted cash flow approach to value the put. Accordingly, the valuation technique provided for the
recognition of the full put amount ($0.12 million) at the present value of its cash flows, using market interest rates that would likely be considered by market participants trading similar instruments.

Salient terms and conditions of Transaction II are as follows:



| |  |  | Under a License and Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, we granted a nonexclusive license to the intellectual property enabling
AutovaxID to manufacture and sell automated cell culture instruments in the United States, Canada and Mexico (the License), which License became exclusive upon the occupancy by AutovaxID of a space located at 1031 Macklind Avenue, St.
Louis, Missouri (the New Plant) in June 2007. As full purchase price for the License and related business opportunity, AutovaxID paid us $5.6 million. We also agreed to sell AutovaxID certain equipment upon the occupancy by
AutovaxID of the New Plant for the fair market value of $0.5 million.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The CDE II Loan is secured by second lien on all assets of AutovaxID for the benefit of CDE II pursuant to a Second-Lien Security Agreement between
AutovaxID and CDE II dated as of December 8, 2006. Laurus has a senior lien on the assets of AutovaxID through our security agreement with Laurus, which AutovaxID joined by way of a Joinder Agreement.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



46



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | AutovaxID does not have the right to prepay the CDE Loan prior to June 8, 2014. AutovaxID does have the right to prepay the CDE Loan after this
date, provided that (i) it prepays the entire CDE Loan amount, (ii) the CDE consents to such prepayment and USBCIC and the managing member of the CDE agree on the reinvestment of such proceeds in an alternative investment that would
qualify as a QLICI, and (iii) AutovaxID or the Individual Guarantors (as defined below) under the Tax Credit and Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement pay to USBCIC the recapture amount so specified is such agreement.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | All indebtedness owed by AutovaxID and its subsidiaries to CDE II, including its right to receive payments of principal and interest under the CDE II
Loan, is expressly subordinate to the extent set forth under the Telesis Subordination Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006 entered into by Laurus, CDE II, USBCIC, AutovaxID and us.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The tax credits arising from this transaction were fully assigned to US Bancorp. AutovaxID has entered into an indemnification agreement directly with
US Bancorp that provides for indemnification in the event of tax credit recapture from events caused by AutovaxID. AutovaxID is contractually required to maintain the following covenants to avoid tax credit recapture: (i) AutovaxID shall
maintain its status as a qualified active low-income business; (ii) At least fifty percent of the use of the tangible property of the AutovaxID (whether owned or leased) will be within the low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e)
of the U.S. Tax Code; (iii) At least fifty percent of the services performed for AutovaxID by its employees will be within low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax Code; (iv) Less than five percent of the
average of the unadjusted bases of the property of AutovaxID will be attributable to collectibles (as defined in Section 408(m)(2) of the Code, and which includes any work of art; any rug or antique; any metal or gem; any stamp or coin; and any
alcoholic beverage) other than collectibles that are held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business; (v) Less than five percent of the average of the unadjusted bases of the property of AutovaxID will be
attributable to nonqualified financial property (as defined in Section 1397C(e) of the Code and in Section 1.45D-1(d)(4)(i)(E) of the Regulations, and which includes debt, stock, partnership interests, options, futures contracts, forward
contracts, warrants, notional principal contracts, annuities and other similar property); (vi) No part of the business activities of AutovaxID will consist of the operation of any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor,
hot tub facility, or suntan facility, race track or other facility used for gambling, or store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; (vii) No part of AutovaxIDs business
activities will include the rental to others of residential rental property (the term residential rental property is defined in Section 168(e)(2)(A) of the Code as meaning any building or structure if eighty percent or more of the
gross rental income from such building or structure for the taxable year is rental income from dwelling units); (viii) The predominant trade or business of AutovaxID will not include the development or holding of intangibles for sale or
license, as provided under Section 1.45D-1(d)(5)(iii) of the Regulations; (ix) Farming (within the meaning of Section 2032A(e)(5)(A) or (B) of the Code) will not be an activity of AutovaxID; (x) AutovaxID will generate
revenues by the date of December 8, 2009; (xi)AutovaxID shall not discontinue conducting business, shall not materially change the nature of its business, and shall not materially change the manner in which its business activities are
conducted, other than changes in the nature of its business or the manner in which it conducts its business that do not cause the making of the Loan by the Lender to cease to constitute a qualified low-income community investment as such
term is used in Section 45D of the Code (as determined by the Lender in its good faith judgment and based upon the advice of counsel); (xii) AutovaxID will not be a bank, credit union or other financial institution; (xiii) AutovaxID
will not maintain a qualified low-income building under Section 42 of the Code; (xiv) AutovaxID will not become a single-member entity treated as disregarded as separate from its owner for federal income tax purposes, nor be liquidated or
merged into another entity without the written consent of CDE II; and (xv) AutovaxID and we will operate consistently with the License between AutovaxID and us, and will not amend such agreement without prior written consent of CDE II. An
example of an event that would not cause a recapture is changes in the Internal Revenue Code that results in such recapture. The total indemnification amount could be $3.12 million (representing 39% of the $8.0 million qualified investment).
However, in accordance with Financial Interpretation 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, the conditions and events that could result in recapture are
within AutovaxIDs control. Therefore, this potential liability is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



47



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Under a Reimbursement Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, we agreed to reimburse St. Louis Development Corp (the 0.01% and managing member of
CDE II) up to $32,000 annually for expenses incurred by St. Louis Development Corp in connection with its management of CDE II.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Various legal, accounting, and professional fees of $433,000 paid directly by us and AutovaxID and involved in structuring this transaction were
recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. Various legal and accounting fees of $180,000 paid by entities in which we have a variable interest (CDE II, and Fund II) and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded as a
reduction to non-controlling interests in variable interest entities on our consolidated balance sheet. Professional fees of $115,000 involved in the continuing management of this transaction were recorded as a prepaid expense and will be amortized
over a period of seven and one half years, representing the duration of the note issued by Fund II and payable to Biolender II.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements require us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates, including
those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, contingencies and litigation on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, involve the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition:

Revenues from contract cell production services are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of contract costs
incurred to date to an estimate of total contract costs for each contract. Because of the inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change in the near term. Contract costs related to
cell culture production include all direct material, subcontract and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, insurance, supplies and tools. We believe that actual costs incurred in contract cell
production services is the best indicator of the performance of the contractual obligations, because the costs relate primarily to the amount of labor incurred to perform such services. The deliverables inherent in each of our cell culture
production contracts are not output driven, but rather driven by a pre-determined production run. The duration of our cell culture production contracts range typically from 2 to 14 months.

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

We
maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances may be required.

Inventory Valuation:

Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market. Write-downs of inventories to market value are based upon contractual provisions and
obsolescence, as well as assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If assumptions about future demand change and/or actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional write-downs of inventories
may be required.

Impairment assessments of long-lived assets:

In assessing the recoverability of our amounts recorded as intangible assets, significant assumptions regarding the estimated future cash flows and other
factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets must be made, as well as the related estimated useful lives. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future as a result of changes in strategy and/or market
conditions, we may be required to record impairment charges.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

Valuation of share-based payments:

We account for stock-based compensation based on ASC Topic 718-Stock Compensation which requires expensing of stock options and other share-based payments
based on the fair value of each option awarded. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This model requires management to estimate the expected volatility, expected dividends, and
expected term as inputs to the valuation model.

Evaluation of variable interest entities:

The consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of wholly-owned companies and interests in joint ventures where we have a controlling
financial interest or has been determined to be the primary beneficiary under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46). All significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Valuation and determination of derivative instruments:

We estimate fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with
the objective of measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique(s), management considers, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. For less complex
derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, we generally use the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, estimated terms and risk free rates)
necessary to fair value these instruments. For forward contracts that contingently require net-cash settlement as the principal means of settlement, management projects and discounts future cash flows applying probability-weighted averages to
multiple possible outcomes. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in
internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in our trading market price which has high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and
subsequently carried at fair values, our income will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

Voluntary Petition
for Bankruptcy:

On November 10, 2008, we, along with our subsidiaries, Biovax, Inc., AutovaxID, Inc., Biolender LLC and Biolender II
LLC (collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11, Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors will continue to operate their business as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Court
and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.

Financial Accounting Standards
Board Codification Topic 852 (FASB ASC 852), which is applicable to companies in Chapter 11, generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, it does require that the financial statements for
periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 petition distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and
provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization and restructuring of the business must be reported separately as reorganization items in the statements of operations beginning in the quarter ending December 31,
2008. The balance sheet must distinguish prepetition liabilities subject to compromise from both those prepetition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of
reorganization must be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, cash provided by reorganization items must be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. We adopted FASB
ASC 852 effective on November 10, 2008 and will segregate those items as outlined above for all reporting periods subsequent to such date.

Fluctuations in Operating Results

Our operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter or year to year, depending on factors such as timing of
biopharmaceutical development and commercialization of products by our customers, the timing and size of orders for instrumentation and cultureware, the timing of increased research and development of
BiovaxID®, and will be impacted by our planned marketing launch of the AutovaxID instrument. Consequently,
revenues, profits or losses may vary significantly from quarter to quarter or year to year, and revenue or profits or losses in any period will not necessarily be indicative of results in subsequent periods.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

Impact of Foreign Sales

A significant amount of our operating revenue has historically been derived from export sales. Our export sales were 28%, and 39% of total revenue for
fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. While we invoice our customers in U.S. dollars, we will be subject to risks associated with foreign sales, including the difficulty of maintaining cross-cultural distribution
relationships, economic or political instability, shipping delays, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange ratios and foreign patent infringement claims, all of which could have a significant impact on our ability to deliver products on a timely
and competitive basis. This has not been a significant factor in prior years. In addition, future imposition of, or significant increases in, the level of customs duties, export quotas or other trade restrictions could have an adverse effect on our
business.

Tax Loss Carryforwards

FASB Codification Topic 740 requires that a deferred tax amount be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence it is
more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance with respect to all our deferred tax assets.

For the tax periods
June 17, 2003, through September 30, 2005, we were part of a consolidated federal income tax return that included Accentia. As of December 7, 2005, we became deconsolidated from the Accentia group as a result of Accentias
ownership in us being reduced below 80% and have filed a separate return for the interim period of December 8, 2005 through September 30, 2006, and will continue to file separate returns thereafter.

We have a federal net operating loss of approximately $76.0 million as of September 30, 2009 (expiring 2020). Under Section 382 and 383 of the
Internal Revenue Code, if an ownership change occurs with respect to a loss corporation, as defined, there are annual limitations on the amount of the net operating loss and other deductions which are available to us. The portion of the
NOLs incurred prior to June 17, 2003 ($3.4 million), are subject to these limitations. As such, these NOLs are limited to approximately $0.2 million per year. NOLs incurred after June 17, 2003 may also be subject to
restriction.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Footnote 3 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of this filing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do
not maintain any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Effects of Inflation

Our assets are primarily liquid in nature and are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, including
employee compensation, raw materials and occupancy, which may not be readily recoverable through charges for services provided by us.



|ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------

Not Applicable.



|ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|------- | -------------------------------------------

Financial Statements: See Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1 immediately following the signature page of this report.



|ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None.



50



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 9A(T). | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|----------- | -----------------------

Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:



| |  | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation under the Internal Control  Integrated Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
September 30, 2009.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding
internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only
managements report in this annual report.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer (principal executive officer) and
chief financial officer (principal financial officer), we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer (principal executive officer) and chief financial officer (principal financial officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or
submit is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer (principal executive officer) and chief financial officer (principal financial officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred
during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION
|-------- | -----------------

Voluntary Petition
for Bankruptcy:

On November 10, 2008, we along with our subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code. With existing cash flow and the potential for relatively near-term significant business development opportunities for BiovaxID and AutovaxID, this action is intended to provide an opportunity for us to restore shareholder
value and to arrange for the ultimate satisfaction of all secured and unsecured creditors. Under protection of the Bankruptcy Court, we plan to implement a series of initiatives designed to significantly decrease operating expenses and financing
costs, and focus cash and resources on priority programs that will allow us to attract key funding/partnering opportunities. The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern
once we emerge from Chapter 11. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to successfully restructure our indebtedness and to emerge from bankruptcy with a viable plan for reorganization and with
adequate liquidity. We believe the Chapter 11 reorganization will achieve these objectives but we can provide no assurances. During this reorganization process, we expect to continue operations without interruption, while striving to maximize
long-term shareholder value.

Grant of Orphan Drug Designation for
BiovaxID®:

On October 28, 2009, the FDA granted Orphan Drug designation to
BiovaxID®. With FDA Orphan Drug designation, we have a seven-year period of market exclusivity for BiovaxID upon
approval, thereby offering competitive protection from similar drugs of the same class. Orphan Drug designation also provides us with eligibility to receive potential tax credit benefits, potential grant funding for research and development and
significantly reduced filing fees for marketing applications.

Termination of Distribution Agreement:

Effective March 21, 2010, we terminated our non-exclusive distribution agreement with VWR for the sale of our AutovaxID instruments.

Appointment of Certain Directors:

On
June 23, 2010, Edmund C. King, CPA was appointed to the Board to serve as a Director to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Robert Weiss, our designated Financial Expert/Director, in November 2008. Mr. King shall serve as a
Director commencing on June 23, 2010 and shall continue to serve as Director for the remainder of the term of that Director position and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. The Board has determined that Mr. King is to serve
as the designated Financial Expert of the Board and meets the applicable requirements of independence so as to allow us to comply, as and when necessary, with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

NMTC Transactions I and II Compromises:

In July 2010, we and certain affiliates entered into an agreement (the Worcester Restructuring Agreement) with Telesis CDE Corporation and
Telesis CDE Two, LLC (collectively, Telesis), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The Worcester Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties pursuant to the
New Market Tax Credit transaction closed April 2006 (see Item 13 for further discussion of this transaction), in consideration of retention by Telesis of an unsecured claim in our Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $0.3 million along
with a settlement payment in the amount of $85,000 to defray certain legal and administrative expenses incurred by Telesis. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, the our Guaranty, the Guaranty by our parent, Accentia, and all subsidiary Guaranties
from affiliates and third parties and all our other obligations to all parties to Transaction I will be terminated.

In July 2010, we and
certain affiliates entered into an agreement (the St. Louis Restructuring Agreement) with St. Louis Development Corporation and Saint Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (collectively, SLDC), contingent upon submission
to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The St. Louis Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties pursuant to the New Market Tax Credit transaction closed April 2006 (see Item 13 for further
discussion of this transaction), in consideration of retention by SLDC of an unsecured claim in our Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $0.16 million along with a settlement payment in the amount of $62,000 to defray certain legal and
administrative expenses incurred by SLDC. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, our Guaranty, the Guaranty by our parent, Accentia, and all subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all our other obligations to all parties to
Transaction II will be terminated.

Filing of Plan of Reorganization

On May 14, 2010, we filed our Joint Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) and on July 2, 2010, we filed our Disclosure Statement with
the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court will schedule a hearing on the Disclosure Statement, anticipated to take place in early August 2010.

PART III



|ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|-------- | --------------------------------

Directors and Executive Officers

On
November 24, 2008, Mr. Weiss resigned from the Board of Directors and from all of the Board committees.

On December 2, 2008,
Dr. Arikian resigned from all of his positions including as Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman and Director.

The following
table sets forth, as of September 30, 2009, certain information concerning our executive officers and directors:



|                                  |  |     |  |                                                      
|--------------------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Name                              |  | Age |  | Position                                             
|Samuel S. Duffey, Esq.*           |  | 65  |  | President & General Counsel                          
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.** |  | 59  |  | Chief Executive Officer, (CEO), Chairman & Director
|Alan M. Pearce                    |  | 60  |  | Chief Financial Officer (CFO)                      
|Raphael J. Mannino, Ph.D.         |  | 62  |  | Director                                             



53



---

##### Table of Contents

|                             |  |     |  |         
|---------------------------- |  | --- |  | --------
|Name                         |  | Age |  | Position
|Peter J. Pappas, Sr.         |  | 69  |  | Director
|Christopher C. Chapman, M.D. |  | 57  |  | Director
|Jeffrey A. Scott, M.D.       |  | 51  |  | Director
|John Sitilides               |  | 47  |  | Director
|Ronald E. Osman, Esq.        |  | 63  |  | Director



|* | Assumed the position of President and General Counsel as of February 24, 2009.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | Assumed the position of CEO and Chairman of our Board of Directors as of February 24, 2009.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Set forth below is biographical information regarding our directors, officers, and key employees:

Samuel S. Duffey, Esq. was appointed President and General Counsel on February 24, 2009. Mr. Duffey has been General Counsel of Accentia
since April 2003 and on December 2, 2008 was also appointed President of Accentia. Prior to that, Mr. Duffey practiced business law with Duffey and Dolan P.A. beginning in 1992. From February 2000 to September 2003, Mr. Duffey served
as the non-executive chairman and as a member of the Board of Directors of Invisa, Inc., a small publicly held safety company, and from October 2001 to May 2004, Mr. Duffey also served as the non-executive chairman and as a member of the Board
of Directors of FlashPoint International, Inc., a publicly held automotive parts company which is currently named Navitrak International Corporation. Mr. Duffey received his B.A. and J.D. degrees from Drake University.

Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.has been a Director and Vice-Chairman (non-executive) of our Company since June 2003. On February 24,
2009, Dr. ODonnell was appointed to Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. Dr. ODonnell is the Chairman, CEO and a director of Accentia, our parent corporation since its inception in 2002. He is also the Chairman and a Director
of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (BDSI) Dr. ODonnell was the founder and for more than the last five years has served as manager of The Hopkins Capital Group (HCG), an affiliation of limited liability
companies which engage in business development and venture activities for disruptive healthcare technologies. Included in companies in which HCG entities are significant stockholders include Accentia and BDSI.

Dr. ODonnell is a 1975, summa cum laude graduate of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. He received his specialty training at the Wilmer
Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital. He is the former Professor and Chairman, Department of Ophthalmology, St Louis University School of Medicine. Dr. ODonnell has published over 30 peer-reviewed scientific articles and he
has been awarded over 34 U.S. Patents. He is the recipient of the 2000 Jules Stein Award from Retinitis Pigmentosa International. He is a Trustee for St. Louis University.

We believe that Dr. ODonnells experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically,
Dr. ODonnells entrepreneurial expertise is extremely valuable in driving the direction of the business, and Dr. ODonnell has been instrumental in facilitating the Companys capital raises. As the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and a significant shareholder in the Companys parent, Accentia, Dr. ODonnell has a meaningful personal stake in the success of the business.

Alan M. Pearce has been our CFO since December 31, 2007. Mr. Pearce has served as a director and CFO of Accentia since August 2004.
Prior to serving as Accentias CFO, Mr. Pearce served as Senior Vice President, Financial Services for McKesson Corporation, a large publicly traded healthcare company, from April 1999 to March 2004. He also previously served as a director
and a member of the finance committee of XL Insurance Company. From September 2002 to September 2005, Mr. Pearce served as a director of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. Mr. Pearce is a graduate of Georgia Tech, where he earned a
B.S. degree in Industrial Management, and the University of Texas, where he earned an MBA degree in finance.

Raphael J. Mannino, Ph.D.
has been a Director of our Company since June 2003. Dr. Mannino has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of BDSI from October 2000 - September 2009, and a director from October 2001-June 2007. Dr. Mannino
previously served as President, CEO, Chief Scientific Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors of BioDelivery Sciences, predecessor to BDSI since its incorporation in 1995. Dr. Manninos previous experience includes positions as
Associate Professor at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (1990 to present), Assistant, then



54



---

##### Table of Contents

Associate Professor, Albany Medical College (1980 to 1990), and Instructor then Assistant Professor, Rutgers
Medical School (1977 to 1980). His postdoctoral training was from 1973 to 1977 at the Biocenter in Basel, Switzerland. Dr. Mannino received his Ph.D. in Biological Chemistry in 1973 from the Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine. We
believe that Dr. Manninos experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically, Dr. Manninos background in pharmaceutical research and development and clinical trials make him a
valuable resource on our Board.

Peter J. Pappas, Sr. has been a Director of our Company since March 2003. Mr. Pappas has for more
than the last five years been the President and CEO of P.J. Mechanical Corp., a major air conditioning contractor in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition to his vast experience in construction for the past forty years, Mr. Pappas is
a prime real estate developer and investor around the country. He attended NYU as a business administration major. A noted philanthropist, Mr. Pappas is an Archon of the Greek Orthodox Church. He serves the Archdiocesan National Council and as
trustee of the privileged Leadership 100 Endowment trust. He is a board member of the Western Policy Center in Washington, D.C., a member of the Board of The Cyprus/American Chamber of Commerce, and the National Chairman of the Cyprus
Childrens Fund, a sponsorship program and scholarship award endowment. We believe that Mr. Pappas experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically, he has extensive business
experience in the construction and real estate industry and extensive involvement in complex financial dealings, and has been instrumental in participating in and facilitating the Companys capital raises. He has also served on a number of
public and non-publically traded companies and organizations boards of directors

Christopher C. Chapman, M.D.has been a
Director of our Company since March 2004 and a Director of Accentia since April 2008. From 2004 to the present, Dr. Chapman has been manager of Chapman Pharmaceutical Consulting, Inc., a consulting organization that provides support on clinical
and regulatory issues for pharmaceutical and biotech companies in North America, Europe, Japan, India and Africa. Dr. Chapman received his M.D. degree from Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. in 1987 where he completed his internship in
Internal Medicine. He completed a residency in Anesthesiology and a fellowship in Cardiovascular and Obstetric Anesthesiology at Georgetown University. Since 1995, Dr. Chapman has been a critical care physician on the staff at Doctors
Community Hospital, Lanham, Maryland. In 2009, Dr. Chapman joined Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and manages pharmacovigilance for an ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial. Dr. Chapman also is a consultant manager for Middle Brook Pharmaceuticals
and a manager for staff at Enzon Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Chapman was the Executive Vice President of Medical and Regulatory Affairs and Director of New Business Development (pharmaceuticals) for BDSI on a part time basis from October 2000 to
November 2004. From 1995 to April 2000, Dr. Chapman was Executive Director, Medical Affairs, Quintiles Consulting and a founding Co-Director of Quintiles BRI (QBRI) Medical Affairs, Drug Safety and Medical Writing Departments. We believe that
Dr. Chapmans experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically, Dr. Chapmans background in drug development consultation and clinical trials make him a valuable resource on
our Board.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

Jeffrey A. Scott, M.D. has been a Director of our Company since March 2004. Dr. Scott, whose
specialty is oncology, currently is the President of P4 Healthcare, a multimedia Healthcare Marketing and Education Company with a focus in Oncology. From 1998 to 2005, Dr. Scott served as the National Medical Director and President of the
International Oncology Network, a network of more than 3500 U.S. Private Practice Oncologists headquartered in Baltimore, MD, since 1998, and in that same role for the International Physician Network. Dr. Scott was a practicing physician,
Partner and CFO of Georgia Cancer Specialists located in Atlanta, GA from 1995 to 2001, acting as CFO for a large practice with over $100 million in revenue and responsible for development of financial programs of practice after merger and corporate
buyout by Phymatrix. In this position, Dr. Scott also took responsibility for the development of an extensive Clinical Research program. From 1998 to 2000, he also served as Medical Chief of Staff at Atlantas Emory Northlake Regional
Medical Center. Dr. Scotts biotech experience includes his role as a Consultant to Nexstar Pharmaceuticals of Boulder, Colorado, assisting and educating the sales force in dealing with physician networks and consulting with investment
advisors regarding potential investments in other biotechnology companies.

Dr. Scotts educational background includes a B.S. in
Microbiology from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and medical education at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan and a fellowship in Oncology at University of Texas Health Sciences, San Antonio, Texas. Dr. Scott has Board
Certifications from the American Board of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine, September 1987, and the American Board of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology, November 1989. He has extensive research and publication credits in the oncology field. We
believe that Dr. Scotts experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically, Dr. Scotts background in the oncology field and his experience in management and on Boards of
Directors of drug development companies make him a valuable resource on our Board.

John Sitilides has been a Director of our Company
since March 2005. Mr. Sitilides is a government relations strategist and Principal at Trilogy Advisors in Washington, D.C, whose successful projects include the accelerated execution of federal agency actions and regulatory corrections, the
structured coordination of Washington, D.C. strategic planning, and preparation of political intelligence reports. Mr. Sitilides worked in the U.S. Senate before founding the Western Policy Center, a respected international relations institute,
in 1998. He served as Executive Director until its 2004 merger with the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. He is Chairman of the Wilson Center Southeast Europe Project and the State Department Foreign Service Institutes Advanced
Area Studies program on Greece and Cyprus. He also serves on the Commerce Department Joint Science and Technology Cooperation Advisory Council (Initiative for Technology Cooperation in the Balkans) and on the Board of Trustees of Leadership 100
Endowment Trust. A frequent media commentator on national politics and global affairs, Mr. Sitilides has been interviewed or featured in leading U.S., European and other international broadcast and print media, and has testified before Congress
on foreign policy. Mr. Sitilides received his Masters Degree in International Affairs at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs in 1986, with specialization in International Security Policy, International
Political Economy, and Western European Affairs, and his Bachelors Degree in Political Science from Queens College in 1983. We believe that Mr. Sitilides experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of
Directors. Specifically, he has extensive experience in governmental relations and interaction with administrative and regulatory agencies of U.S. and foreign governments.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

Ronald E. Osman, Esq.has been a Director of our Company since November 2, 2006 to serve as an
interim Director until the next annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Osman is the founder, president and senior partner of the law offices of Ronald E. Osman & Associates, Ltd. Mr. Osman established the practice in 1979. The firm
concentrates on actions brought under the Federal False Claims Act as well as actions concerning commercial law and personal injury. The firm maintains offices in Marion, Illinois and Dongola, Illinois. After receiving a Bachelor of Science in
Agriculture/Economics from the University of Illinois in 1968, Mr. Osman joined the United States Marine Corp, where he served as an officer from 1969 to 1972. In 1976, Mr. Osman began law school at Southern Illinois University.
Mr. Osman completed his law degree in two and one half years and received his Juris Doctorate from Southern Illinois University in 1979. Mr. Osman has been actively engaged in the practice of law since that time. In addition to his law
practice, Mr. Osman operates a farming business, an oil production business, and a motel enterprise. He is a member of Illinois Bar Association, Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, and National Health Lawyers Association. He also serves as a
Member of the Board of Dongola Clinic and is a Founding Member of Rural Health, Inc. We believe that Mr. Osmans experience and skills make him a qualified and valuable member of our Board of Directors. Specifically, Mr. Osmans
entrepreneurial expertise and knowledge of the law, especially in health related fields, is extremely valuable in driving the direction of the business. He also has previous experience in founding and selling business enterprises and has been an
active participant in financing activities of the Company.

Audit Committee of the Board

On November 10, 2008, in an effort to mitigate costs while we are seeking to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, we enacted
resolutions amending the charters for our Audit Committee, Governance Committee and Compensation Committee to eliminate any requirement for members to be independent as that term is defined in rules promulgated by NASDAQ. During the pendency of the
Chapter 11 proceedings and until further resolution of our Board of Directors, the activities of the standing committees of the Board of Directors have been suspended and all corporate actions are being managed by the full Board of Directors. The
Audit, Governance, Compensation Committees will be reinstated and members appointed by the Board at or prior to our exit from our reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Code of Ethical Conduct

Our Board of
Directors has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct that is applicable to all of the officers and directors including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer or controller and its
subsidiaries. The text of the Code of Ethical Conduct has been filed as an Exhibit to our SEC reports as Exhibit 10.36 to our Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed with SEC on January 14, 2004.

Our bylaws provide for us to indemnify our directors and officers to the extent permitted by law, with respect to actions taken by them on our behalf. We
maintain a policy of directors and officers liability insurance for this purpose.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an officer, director, or greater-than-10% shareholder of the Company must
file a Form 4 reporting the acquisition or disposition of the Companys equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than the end of the second business day after the day the transaction occurred unless certain
exceptions apply. Transactions not reported on Form 4 must be reported on Form 5 within 45 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year. Such persons must also file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 upon becoming an officer, director,
or greater-than-10% shareholder. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of these reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, our officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial
owners complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|-------- | ----------------------

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 2009



|                                             |  |      |  |            |  |                  |     |  |                           |  |           |    
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---- |  | ---------- |  | ---------------- | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | --------- | ---
|Name and principal position                  |  | Year |  | Salary ($) |  | OptionAwards ($) |     |  | All
OtherCompensation ($) |  | Total ($) |    
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.,
M.D. CEO/Chairman |  | 2009 |  | 0          |  | 56,950           | (1) |  | 0                         |  | 56,950    | (1)
|                                             |  |      |  |            | 
|Samuel S. Duffey, Esq.,
President            |  | 2009 |  | 176,683    |  | 76,050           |     |  | 8,576                     |  | 261,309   |    
|                                             |  |      |  |            | 
|Alan M. Pearce, CFO                          |  | 2009 |  | 131,250    |  | 50,700           |     |  | 9,307                     |  | 191,257   |    



|(1) | Includes director compensation in the amount of $6,250 by way of option award grant
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Base Salaries. The base salaries were established by employment agreements existing prior to fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2009, we did not
establish specific performance objectives for these executives and our decisions were based on their overall performances.

Cash Bonuses
and Incentives. In fiscal 2009, no cash bonuses were paid or accrued to our executive officers.

Option Awards. The
amounts in this column include the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The fair value of the stock options will likely vary from the
actual value the holder receives because the actual value depends on the number of options exercised and the market price of our stock on the date of exercise. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 14 to the
Companys audited financial statements found in Item 15 below.

Perquisites. Consistent with our philosophy to
preserve cash, we have sought to limit perquisites. Perquisites paid to our named executive officers are discussed as footnotes to the following Summary Compensation Table. Our policy for paying medical and dental insurance is to pay 75% of the
insurance premium. Our policy for paying life insurance, long-term and short-term disability insurances and accidental death and dismemberment insurance is to pay 100% of the insurance premiums. Our policy with regard to unused vacation for our
executive group is to pay at the base salary rate for vacation not used in the prior fiscal year.

Change in Control Severance Policy.Each of our named executive officers entered into written employment agreements with us. None of our named executive officers have change in control severance provisions in their employment agreements.



58



---

##### Table of Contents

Employment Agreements with Executives

Samuel S. Duffey, Esq.On January 1, 2005, our parent corporation Accentia, entered into an employment agreement with Samuel S. Duffey, our
General Counsel. On December 2, 2008, Accentia amended the employment agreement to include the title of President. This agreement has an initial term of five years, and continues thereafter on an at-will basis, terminable during the
at-will period by either party for any reason and at any time upon 30 days notice. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Duffey is entitled to a base salary of $350,000 per year, of which a portion is allocated to us. The
agreement provides that Mr. Duffey is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus with a target of 50% of his annual base salary. The agreement provides that, if we terminate Mr. Duffeys employment without cause, because of
disability, or for cause (except for dishonesty, misconduct, or unlawful acts that adversely affect us or pleading guilty or no contest to, or a conviction of, a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, dishonesty, or
misrepresentation), or Mr. Duffey terminates his own employment for good reason, then he will be entitled to severance compensation in the amount of his base salary, health and welfare benefits, and all his options shall continue to vest for
the 12-month period following the date of termination. Mr. Duffey will be deemed to have terminated his employment for good reason if he terminates because of a material breach of the agreement by us that is not cured within 30 days of written
notice of the breach, the assignment by us without his consent to a position, responsibilities or duties of a materially lesser status or degree of responsibility, the relocation of our principal executive offices outside of Tampa, Florida, or we
require him to be based anywhere other than our principal executive offices. The agreement provides that during the time of his employment and ending two years from the termination of the agreement, he may not solicit customers and will not engage
in or own any business that is competitive with us.

Alan M. Pearce.On January 1, 2005, our parent corporation Accentia, entered
into an employment agreement with Alan M. Pearce, our Chief Financial Officer. This agreement has an initial term of five years, and continues thereafter on an at-will basis, terminable during the at-will period by either
party for any reason and at any time upon 30 days notice. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Pearce is entitled to an initial base salary of $260,000 per year, of which a portion is allocated to us. The agreement provides that
Mr. Pearce is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus with a target of 50% of his annual base salary. The agreement provides that, if we terminate Mr. Pearces employment without cause, because of disability, or for cause
(except for dishonesty, misconduct, or unlawful acts that adversely affect us or pleading guilty or no contest to, or a conviction of, a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, dishonesty, or misrepresentation), or Mr. Pearce
terminates his own employment for good reason, then he will be entitled to severance compensation in the amount of his base salary, health and welfare benefits, and all his options shall continue to vest for the 12-month period following the date of
termination. Mr. Pearce will be deemed to have terminated his employment for good reason if he terminates because of a material breach of the agreement by us that is not cured within 30 days of written notice of the breach, the assignment by us
without his consent to a position, responsibilities or duties of a materially lesser status or degree of responsibility, the relocation of our principal executive offices outside of Tampa, Florida, or we require him to be based anywhere other than
our principal executive offices. The agreement provides that during the time of his employment and ending two years from the termination of the agreement, he may not solicit customers and will not engage in or own any business that is competitive
with us.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2009 FISCAL YEAR-END



|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  |                                                                    |  |                         |  |                     
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------
|Name                                                      |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions (#) -Exercisable |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions (#) -Unexercisable |  | OptionExercisePrice ($) |  | OptionExpirationDate
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.
CEO/Chairman of the Board |  | 20,000                                                           |  |                                                                    |  | 0.50                    |  | 03/13/2014          
|                                                          |  | 20,000                                                           |  |                                                                    |  | 0.50                    |  | 03/10/2015          
|                                                          |  | 60,000                                                           |  |                                                                    |  | 1.13                    |  | 10/19/2016          
|                                                          |  | 75,000                                                           |  |                                                                    |  | 0.66                    |  | 04/11/2018          
|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  | 1,000,000                                                          |  | 0.06                    |  | 02/24/2020          
|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  | 125,000                                                            |  | 0.07                    |  | 02/24/2020          
|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  |                                                                   
|Samuel S. Duffey, Esq.,
President/General Counsel         |  | 500,000                                                          |  |                                                                   |  | 0.50                    |  | 11/11/2013          
|                                                          |  | 500,000                                                          |  |                                                                   |  | 0.72                    |  | 02/10/2016          
|                                                          |  | 150,000                                                          |  |                                                                   |  | 0.60                    |  | 04/11/2018          
|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  | 1,500,000                                                          |  | 0.06                    |  | 02/24/2020          
|                                                          |  |                                                                  |  |                                                                   
|Alan M. Pearce, CFO                                       |  | 150,000                                                          |  |                                                                   |  | 0.60                    |  | 04/11/2018          
|                                                          |  |                                                                 |  | 1,000,000                                                          |  | 0.06                    |  | 02/24/2020          

Option Grants.In fiscal
2009, we granted 3.5 million options under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to executives. The option grants have an exercise price that was equal to 100% of the closing market price for our common stock on the date of the option grant. Our
decision to grant options, was based primarily on the recommendation of our Board of Directors and our desire to retain and motivate our executives.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009



|                                |  |                  |     |  |           |    
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --- |  | --------- | ---
|Name and principal position     |  | OptionAwards ($) |     |  | Total ($) |    
|Francis E. ODonnell,
Jr., M.D. |  | 6,250            | (1) |  | 6,250     | (1)
|                                |  |                 
|Christopher C.
Chapman, M.D.    |  | 5,000            |     |  | 5,000     |    
|                                |  |                 
|Ronald E. Osman,
Esq.           |  | 5,000            |     |  | 5,000     |    
|                                |  |                 
|Raphael J. Mannino,
Ph.D.       |  | 5,125            |     |  | 5,125     |    
|                                |  |                 
|Jeffrey A. Scott,
M.D.          |  | 5,375            |     |  | 5,375     |    
|                                |  |                 
|Peter J. Pappas, Sr.            |  | 5,000            |     |  | 5,000     |    
|                                |  |                 
|John Sitilides                  |  | 5,250            |     |  | 5,250     |    



|(1) | This amount is also reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Directors receive reimbursement of expenses and an annual grant of options to purchase shares of common stock as compensation for serving as members or
chairmen of the Board of Directors (the Board) or of various committees of the Board. The director compensation stock options issued for FY2009 are set forth above. The amounts in this column include the aggregate grant date fair value
computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The fair value of the stock options will likely vary from the actual value the holder receives because the actual value depends on the
number of options exercised and the market price of our stock on the date of exercise. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 14 to the Companys audited financial statements found in Item 15 below.

Equity Incentive Plan

Our
2000 Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Plan), approved by our stockholders and the Board effective July 19, 2000, authorizes awards of incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options to employees, directors, and consultants of our
company, our subsidiaries and affiliates. The purposes of the 2000 Plan are to encourage and enable employees, directors, and consultants to acquire a proprietary interest in the growth and performance of our company, to generate an increased
incentive for key employees and directors to contribute to our future success and prosperity, thus enhancing the value of our company for the benefit of our stockholders, and to enhance the ability of our company to attract and retain key employees
and directors who are essential to progress, growth, and profitability. A total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock may be granted under the 2000 Plan, limited to 1.0 million shares per employee per calendar year.

On November 2, 2006, the Board adopted the 2006 Biovest Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by the stockholders by submission to majority
shareholder action on October 4, 2007 and under which, the number of shares available for grant under the Plan and the 2006 Plan was increased to a total of 27.0 million.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

The 2000 Plan and 2006 Plan (collectively, the Stock Option Plans) are administered by our
Board. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Stock Option Plans, the administrator has the authority to grant options and to determine the purchase price of the shares of our common stock covered by each option, the term of each option, the
number of shares of our common stock to be covered by each option, to establish vesting schedules, to designate options as incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, and to determine the persons to whom grants are to be made.

The administrator establishes the option exercise price, which in the case of incentive stock options, must be at least the market price (as
such term is defined in the Stock Option Plans) of our common stock on the date of the grant or, with respect to optionees who own at least 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock (a 10% Stockholder), 110% of
the market price on the date of the grant.

Options granted under the Stock Option Plans are generally not transferable by the optionee except
by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to written agreement approved by the administrator relating to any non-qualified stock options in any manner authorized under applicable law. Except as provided in the applicable stock
option agreement, options must be exercised within 60 days of termination (or under the 2006 Plan, within 90 days of termination) for any reason other than disability, retirement, or death, within one year of termination by disability or retirement,
or by a designated beneficiary within two years of death.

Except as provided to the contrary in the option agreement, options granted under
the Stock Option Plans vest in one-third annual increments beginning on the grant date of the option. In no event may an incentive stock option be granted more than 10 years from the effective date of the Stock Option Plans, be exercised after the
expiration of 10 years from the grant date, or five years from the grant date in the case of a 10% Stockholder.

Incentive stock options may
not vest for the first time with the respect to any optionee in a calendar year with a market price exceeding $0.1 million. Any option grants that exceed that amount shall be automatically treated as nonstatutory stock options.

The Stock Option Plans may be suspended, terminated, modified, or amended by our board, but no such suspension, termination, modification, or amendment
may adversely affect the terms of any option previously granted without the consent of the affected optionee, and any amendment will be subject to stockholder approval to the extent required by applicable law, rules, or regulations.

We, from time to time, grant to our directors, executive officers and employees options to purchase our common stock under the Stock Option Plans. As of
September 30, 2009, we had options to purchase 12,937,557 shares of common stock outstanding and 6,610,890 shares exercisable at a weighted average price of $0.42 per share and $0.76 per share respectively.

401(k) Savings Plan

We have adopted a
tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan, or 401(k) plan that covers all of our employees.Pursuant to our 401(k) plan, participants may elect to reduce their current compensation, on a pre-tax basis, by any percentage the
participant elects, up to statutorily prescribed annual limits, and have the amount of the reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan also permits us, in our sole discretion, to make employer matching contributions equal to a
specified percentage (as we determine) of the amount a participant has elected to contribute to the plan, and/or employer profit-sharing contributions equal to a specified percentage (as we determine) of an employees compensation. In fiscal
2009, we made no matching contributions.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors; Insurance

Our Amended Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that we shall indemnify, to the full extent authorized by Sections 102(b)(7) and 145 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, any person with respect to any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action or proceeding instituted or threatened by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was a
director or officer of our company or any predecessor of our company, is or was serving at the request of our company or a predecessor of our company as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise.



62



---

##### Table of Contents

Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware authorizes the indemnification of
directors and officers against liability incurred by reason of being a director or officer and against expenses (including attorneys fees) in connection with defending any action seeking to establish such liability, in the case of third-party
claims, if the officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and if such officer or director shall not have been adjudged liable for negligence or
misconduct, unless a court otherwise determines. Indemnification is also authorized with respect to any criminal action or proceeding where the officer or director had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

In accordance with Section 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, our Amended Certificate of Incorporation eliminates
the personal liability of directors to us and to stockholders for monetary damage for violation of a directors fiduciary duty of care. Our Bylaws provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and further provide for advancement of expenses to directors and officers prior to final disposition of a matter unless a quorum of disinterested directors (or independent legal counsel if such a
quorum is unobtainable or such a quorum so directs) determines, based on the facts then available, that (a) such director or officer acted in bad faith or deliberately breached his duty to us or our stockholders and (b) as a result of such
actions, it is more likely than not that it will be ultimately determined that such director or officer is not entitled to indemnification. Our Bylaws, as amended, provide that such indemnification is not exclusive of indemnification pursuant to
indemnification agreements with any of its directors and officers or otherwise.

We also maintain a policy of directors and
officers liability insurance to indemnify our directors and officers with respect to actions taken by them on our behalf.

Insofar as
indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Act and is therefore unenforceable.



|ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2007 for:



| |  |  | each person (or group of affiliated persons) known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | each of our directors;
| | - |  | ----------------------



| |  |  | each named executive officer; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

Information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished by each director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally requires that such person have voting or investment power with respect to securities. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person listed
below and the percentage ownership of such person, shares of common stock underlying options, warrants or convertible securities held by each such person that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days of September 30, 2009 are deemed
outstanding, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

Except as otherwise noted below, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named have
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.



|                                                                                          |  |                             |  |                                            |  |                                          |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------- | -
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owner                                                      |  | Reporting Status            |  | AggregateNumber of SharesBeneficiallyOwned |  | Percentageof SharesBeneficiallyOwned (1) |  
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D. (2)
865 Longboat Club Road
Long Boat Key, FL 34228        |  | CEO, Chairman & Director    |  | 1,760,454                                  |  | 1.77                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Samuel S. Duffey, Esq. (3)
8771 Grey Oaks Blvd.
Sarasota, FL 34238                        |  | President & General Counsel |  | 1,150,000                                  |  | 1.17                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Alan M. Pearce (4)
13766 E. Yucca Street
Scottsdale, AZ 85259                             |  | CFO                         |  | 1,010,082                                  |  | 1.02                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Jeffrey A. Scott, M.D. (5)
2 Spring Forest Court
Owings Mills, MD 21117                   |  | Director                    |  | 275,000                                    |  | 0.28                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Raphael J. Mannino, Ph.D. (6)
518 Lannon Lane
Glen Gardner, NJ 08826                      |  | Director                    |  | 210,000                                    |  | 0.21                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Christopher C. Chapman, M.D. (7)
800 Falls Lake Drive
Mitchellville, MD 20721             |  | Director                    |  | 160,000                                    |  | 0.16                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|John Sitilides (8)
8121 Dunsinane Court
McLean, VA 22102                                  |  | Director                    |  | 381,636                                    |  | 0.41                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Ronald E. Osman, Esq. (9)
1602 Kimmel Street
Marion, IL 62959                             |  | Director                    |  | 4,941,230                                  |  | 4.82                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Peter J. Pappas, Sr. (10)
135 West
18thStreet, Second Floor
New York, NY 10011            |  | Director                    |  | 2,155,878                                  |  | 2.18                                     | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (11)*
324 S. Hyde Park Avenue
Suite 350
Tampa, FL 33606 |  | 5% Stockholder              |  | 113,024,887                                |  | 82.22                                    | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (12)*
335 Madison Avenue
10th Floor
New York, NY 10017           |  | 5% Stockholder              |  | 27,566,941                                 |  | 22.24                                    | %
|                                                                                          |  |                             | 
|All officers and directors as a group                                                     |  |                             |  | 18,976,212                                 |  | 11.13                                    | %



|(1) | These percentages are based upon the 97,549,783 of our outstanding common stock on September 30, 2009.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



64



---

##### Table of Contents

|(2) | In addition to serving as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors of our company, Dr. ODonnell also serves as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Accentia, which is the record owner of 73,115,818 shares of our stock. In the foregoing table, Dr. ODonnells beneficial ownership includes: (a) 175,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by
Dr. ODonnell that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009 and (b) 1,585,454 warrants held by Hopkins II. Dr. ODonnell holds voting and investment power over shares held
by Hopkins II as its manager.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | In addition to serving as President and General Counsel of our company, Mr. Duffey also serves as President and General Counsel of Accentia, which is the record
owner of 73,115,818 shares of our stock. In the foregoing table, Mr. Duffeys beneficial ownership consists of 1,150,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Mr. Duffey that are currently exercisable or that are
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | In addition to serving as Chief Financial Officer of our company. Mr. Pearce also serves as CFO and a director of Accentia, which is the record owner of 73,115,818
shares of our stock. In the foregoing table, Mr. Pearces beneficial ownership includes: (a) 150,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Mr. Pearce that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable
within 60 days of September 30, 2009 and (b) 860,082 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to warrants held by Mr. Pearce that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | In the foregoing table, Dr. Scotts beneficial ownership consists of 275,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Dr. Scott that
are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | In the foregoing table, Dr. Manninos beneficial ownership consists of 210,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Dr. Mannino
that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | In the foregoing table, Dr. Chapmans beneficial ownership consists of 160,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Dr. Chapman
that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(10) | In the foregoing table, Mr. Sitilides beneficial ownership includes: (a) 24,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Sitilides (b) 350,000 shares of
common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Mr. Sitilides that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009 and (c) 31,636 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to warrants held by
Mr. Sitilides that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(11) | In the foregoing table, Mr. Osmans beneficial ownership includes: (a) 80,878 shares of common stock held by Mr. Osman; (b) 1,4000,000 shares
of common stock issuable pursuant to warrants held by Mr. Osman that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009; (d) 1,250,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to secured convertible
debenture held by Mr. Osman that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009; and (e) 2,210,352 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to convertible promissory note held by Mr. Osman
that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(12) | In the foregoing table, Mr. Pappas beneficial ownership includes: (a) 1,138,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Pappas; (b) 120,000 shares
of common stock issuable pursuant to options held by Mr. Pappas that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009; and (c) 894,545 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to warrants held by
Mr. Pappas that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(13) | In the foregoing table, Accentias beneficial ownership includes: (a) 73,115,818 shares of common stock held by Accentia and (b) 39,909,069 shares of
common stock issuable pursuant to a convertible intercompany note held by Accentia that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(14) | In the foregoing table, Laurus beneficial ownership includes: (a) 1,148,708 shares of common stock held by Laurus; (b) 24,386,983 shares of common stock
issuable pursuant to warrants held by Laurus that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009; and (c) 2,031,250 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to a secured convertible debenture held by
Valens US SPV I LLC, an affiliate of Laurus that are currently exercisable or that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2009.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|* | Laurus has been granted a warrant by Accentia to purchase common stock up to 10.0 million shares of our common stock currently issued to Accentia.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



65



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.



|                                                       |  |                                                                     |  |                                                       |      |                                                               |          
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------
|Plan category                                          |  | Number ofsecurities tobe issueduponexercise
ofoutstandingoptions(a) |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice ofoutstandingoptions(b) |      | Number ofsecuritiesremaining 
availablefor future issuance(c)
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |  | 12,937,557                                                          |  | $                                                     | 0.42 |                                                               | 7,062,443
|                                                       |  |                                                                     |  |                                                       |      |                                                               |          
|Total                                                  |  | 12,937,557                                                          |  |                                                       |      |                                                               | 7,062,443
|                                                       |  |                                                                     |  |                                                       |      |                                                               |          



|ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|-------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Relationship to Parent

As of
September 30, 2009, the Company is a 75% owned subsidiary of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia).

On April 10,
2003, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Accentia. The Investment Agreement closed on June 16, 2003. As a result, Accentia acquired approximately eighty-one per cent of our capital stock for a purchase price of $20.0 million. A
portion of the purchase price was paid by promissory notes. Our need for funding exceeded the payments as scheduled under these promissory notes and in August 2004, we entered into an amendment to our Investment Agreement under which Accentia agreed
to use reasonable efforts to make advances to us as inter-company loans, to become due and retired as payments become due under the original Investment Agreement. Amounts advanced prior to their due date are covered by a Line of Credit Promissory
Note (LOCPN), and the outstanding balance under this LOCPN is secured by a security interest in all of our assets. As of September 30, 2007 all amounts due under the Investment Agreement had been paid timely. Subsequently, we
required additional funding and through September 30, 2007, we borrowed an additional $10.8 million from Accentia in the form of three inter-company demand notes. All sums owed pursuant to this demand indebtedness are secured by a security
interest in all of our assets. We incurred $0.7 million and $0.4 million in interest expense relating to the demand notes, during the year ended September 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively. No interest expense was incurred on these notes for the
year ended September 30, 2005.

As part of the Investment Agreement, we granted to Accentia the first right of refusal to acquire
additional shares to maintain its percentage ownership in the event we issue shares. Pursuant to this agreement, Accentia acquired 1,278,947 shares of our common stock as a result of a warrant exercise and 17,902,062 shares of our common stock as a
result of the cashless warrant exercises described below. Pursuant to the terms of the First Right of Refusal Agreement, Accentias purchase price for these shares was equal to the gross purchase price paid for the issuance of the triggering
shares. The amounts owed to us by Accentia for these exercises were applied against the intercompany demand notes. On October 31, 2006, we entered into a Termination Agreement with Accentia under which Accentia agreed to immediately terminate
the absolute anti-dilution rights that were granted to Accentia pursuant to the First Right of Refusal Agreement. In consideration of Accentias termination of the First Right of Refusal Agreement, we issued to Accentia 5.0 million shares
of our common stock. On February 5, 2008, the terms of these notes were modified to allow Accentia the option to convert part of all of the principal and interest duo into shares of the our common stock at a conversion price of $1.10 per share
subject to adjustment in the event of certain capitalizations or in the event of the sale of our common stock at prices below the conversion price (Conversion Option). On September 22, 2008, as provided for under the adjustment
provisions of the Conversion Option, the conversion price was modified to allow Accentia to convert part or all of the principal and interest due into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.32 per share. We granted piggybank and
demand registration rights to Accentia for the shares underlying this Conversion Option.

We use services provided by Accentia. These services
include administrative, human resource, legal and accounting facilities and personnel maintained by Accentia. Additionally, in August 2004, we entered into a Biologic Products Commercialization Agreement making Accentia our exclusive
commercialization partner for all biologics products, including BiovaxID. The Agreement provided that, for so long as Accentia owned fifty one percent or more of our outstanding capital stock, we were only required to reimburse Accentia for direct
and indirect expenses. Had Accentia owned less than fifty one percent of our outstanding capital stock, we would have been required to pay scheduled compensation for these services. These commercialization services included allocated consulting
services with regard to our clinical trial, assistance with the development of BiovaxID and AutovaxID, product positioning, pricing and other matters regarding our cell culture production services and instruments and our vaccine. These
commercialization expenses and other services, and general and administrative expenses paid by Accentia for our benefit were treated as inter-company advances made to us by Accentia and are included in the loans discussed above. Whenever possible
charges paid by Accentia on our behalf were specifically identified and charged to us through the inter-company account. Other direct and indirect costs were allocated to us using a pro-rata or percentage-of-time basis which management believes is
reasonable.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

Under the Biologics Products Commercialization Agreement, Accentia would have been entitled to 49% of our
net profits from the sale of biologics products, had their ownership drop below 51%. There were no profits allocable to Accentia under this agreement during the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2007. On October 31, 2006, we entered into
a Royalty Agreement with Accentia that terminated and superseded the Biologics Products Commercialization Agreement. The new Royalty Agreement provides that Accentia is no longer our exclusive commercialization partner and replaces the share of net
profits with a 19.5% royalty based on net sales and license revenue of biologics products. The products and territory subject to the Royalty Agreement remain identical to those terms previously contained in the Biologics Commercialization Agreement.
In consideration for Accentia entering into this Royalty Agreement, we issued to Accentia five million shares of our common stock, representing the independently appraised value to us of the new agreement. There were no profits allocable to Accentia
under the Royalty Agreement for the year ended September 30, 2009.

On September 30, 2005, we entered into agreements with fourteen
holders of outstanding Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the Notes) providing for the modification of the terms of their respective Notes. These fourteen holders collectively represent $5.0 million of the total $5.7 million in
aggregate principal and accrued but unpaid interest under the Notes outstanding as of September 30, 2005. Under the modifications to the Notes, the fourteen note holders agreed that their Notes, including interest thereunder, would
automatically convert into our common stock on the earlier of (i) December 1, 2005 or (ii) 30-days after an initial public offering by Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. The Notes held by these fourteen note holders were convertible
into either our common stock or Accentia common stock, at the option of the holder. Also as a part of these modifications to these Notes, certain note holders agreed to increase the conversion price of their respective Notes. In December 2005, nine
of these note holders converted their notes with an aggregate principal and interest value of $1.3 million into 1,669,900 shares of our common stock.

Five of these note holders converted the outstanding principal and interest on their notes, in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.7 million, into
0.5 million shares of common stock of Accentia. As a result of this conversion, we are indebted to Accentia for inter-company demand debt of $3.7 million. One of the note holders electing to convert into Accentia common stock is a current
director and two others are our former executive officers and directors.

On September 30, 2005, we entered into agreements with thirteen
holders of warrants to purchase our common stock, including the holders of warrants discussed above, which agreements provided for the immediate cashless exercise of such warrants. Prior to these agreements, these warrants were not exercisable on a
cashless basis. As a result of these agreements, the number of shares issued upon the exercise of these warrants was 4.2 million shares of our common stock, and the consideration paid for such shares was the relinquishment of warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 8.6 million shares, or 4.4 million additional shares, of our common stock. Immediately prior to the agreements, the warrants represented the right to purchase an aggregate of 8.6 million shares for an
aggregate exercise price of $4.9 million. On September 30, 2005 we issued 4,199,249 shares of common stock to these warrant holders. One of these warrant holders is our current director, and three others are former directors.

On September 30, 2004, we entered into a Master Services Agreement and Project Addendum agreement with PPD Development LP (hereinafter
PPD). PPD, a Contract Research Organization, will perform a wide range of services in the conduct and data management of the ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial of BiovaxID, our personalized therapeutic vaccine for indolent follicular
non-Hodgkins lymphoma. The services to be performed by PPD include identification, recruitment and qualification of additional clinical trial sites to accelerate the pace of the patient enrollment into the trial, facilitation of patient
enrollment, coordination of data and information management services, and regulatory compliance functions, among others. The agreement with PPD may be terminated by us at any time upon 30 days notice. PPD is a shareholder of Accentia. For the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, we incurred expense of $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively in this regard. Additionally, $1.9 million was owed PPD at September 30, 2009 and is included in liabilities subject to compromise
in our consolidated balance sheet as a result of our Chapter 11 petition.



67



---

##### Table of Contents

On April 25, 2006, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Biovax, closed a financing transaction (the
Transaction) that was structured in an effort to obtain certain perceived advantages and enhancements from the NMTC regulations adopted under the auspices of the United States Department of the Treasury in 2002 to provide incentive for
investing in businesses located in qualifying census tracts, or areas with a median income below the poverty line. In the Transaction, Biovax entered into a Convertible Loan Agreement where Telesis CDE purchased from Biovax a
Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note dated as of April 25, 2006 in the principal amount of $11.5 million (CDE Loan). The CDE Loan has a maturity date of October 27, 2013 and is described in more detail below. The following
parties were involved in the Transaction: Biovax, Accentia, Biolender, Telesis CDE Two, LLC (Telesis CDE), Telesis CDE Corporation, Biovax Investment LLC (Leverage Fund), U.S. Bancorp Community Investment Corporation
(USBCIC), First Bank and Laurus. In connection with the NMTC financing, four Accentia common stockholders, three of whom are also Accentia Board members, pledged personal assets guaranteeing certain of our obligations regarding the
series of transactions and program requirements. As consideration for these guarantees, we issued four warrants on April 20, 2006, to issue a total of 1.0 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The warrants
vest in entirety on April 20, 2007, and expire October 19, 2013. This includes a warrant to purchase 0.25 million shares of common stock for Ronald E. Osman, Esq., who is now a member of our Board of Directors but was not at the time
of the transaction.

Under an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 18, 2006, we transferred all or substantially all of the assets
of our vaccine manufacturing business situated at 377 Plantation Street, Worcester, Massachusetts (the Plant and the assets hereinafter the Equipment) and our rights under that certain lease agreement for the Plant and that
certain letter of intent with the landlord to potentially lease additional space adjacent to the Plant (collectively the Leasehold) to Biovax. As full purchase price for the Equipment, Biovax paid us $1.5 million and assumed certain
liabilities, including a portion of a demand note payable to Accentia. In addition, Biovax advanced rental payments for the Leasehold in the amount of $4.5 million. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we are required to treat the advance as
unrestricted and non-segregated funds provided that we must use the funds to make all required lease payments. Finally, Biovax also hired all of our employees that are related to the vaccine manufacturing business and assumed responsibility for all
accrued vacation time and the maintenance of existing health and other benefits.

Previously, on March 31, 2006, in contemplation of the
Transaction and other potential NMTC financings and other financings, we closed a financing transaction with Laurus pursuant to which Laurus purchased from us a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $7.8 million (the Laurus
Note) along with a Warrant to purchase up to 18,087,889 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share. Under the terms of the Laurus Note, $7.5 million of the principal amount was deposited into our restricted bank account
(the Restricted Account) pursuant to a restricted account agreement between us and Laurus. Accentia, Analytica and Laurus also entered into an Amended and Restated Stock Pledge Agreement pledging Accentias shares of TEAMM,
Analytica, our Company and Biolender to secure the obligations owed to Laurus as a result of the Laurus Note and Transaction.

In
contemplation of the Transaction, we along with our parent, Accentia, formed Biolender. On April 21, 2006, $2.5 million was released from the Restricted Account created under the Laurus Note to fund the purchase of a 29.5% equity interest in
Biolender for our benefit. In addition, on April 27, 2006, Accentia, our majority shareholder, used the proceeds of a $6.0 million intraday loan from First Bank to purchase the remaining 70.5% equity interest in Biolender. All distributions
from Biolender were allocated to Accentia until Accentia receives the return of its capital contribution and then to us until we receive the return of our capital contribution and then proportionately between Accentia and us. The loan obligation was
also subject to a First Bank Subordination Agreement with respect to the Laurus obligations as a senior lender. All of the equity interests in Biolender owned by us and Accentia have been pledged to Laurus as collateral to secure the Laurus Note and
Accentias guarantee of the Laurus Note. On April 27, 2006, we redeemed 10.0 million shares of our common stock owned of record by Accentia for a $6.0 million cash payment which equaled the market price of $0.60 per share. Accentia
used the proceeds of the stock redemption to repay its intraday loan due First Bank. Subsequent to the Transaction, on October 31, 2006, we purchased Accentias entire ownership interest in Biolender in consideration of the issuance by us
to Accentia of 10 million additional shares of our common stock.



68



---

##### Table of Contents

On August 2, 2006, we, along with Biovax, entered into an Amendment and Consent to Release (the
Amendment) with Laurus. The Amendment amends the Restricted Account Agreement and Side Letter Agreement entered into by us and Laurus on March 31, 2006 (the Agreements) to permit the release to us from the Restricted
Account of the sum of $2.5 million (the Release) prior to the satisfaction of the preconditions for such Release as set forth in the Agreements. The Amendment further sets forth commitments on our part and outlines corresponding
events of default related to those commitments with regard to consummation of NMTC enhanced financings and the use of the proceeds being released. In accordance with the terms of the Amendment, the sum of $2.5 million was released from the
Restricted Account to us on August 2, 2006.

On August 7, 2006, we formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary corporation called
AutovaxID, Inc. We anticipate that this subsidiary may potentially be used to conduct the business of manufacturing and commercially distributing our AutovaxID instruments in the future.

On September 29, 2006, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with certain institutional purchasers of 8% Secured Convertible Debentures
due September 29, 2010 (the Purchasers) issued by our majority shareholder, Accentia, wherein we agreed to file with the SEC and to seek to have declared effective a registration statement covering the resale of 18.0 million
shares of our common stock owned by Accentia. These shares are transferable to the institutional purchases upon the exchange or exercise of debentures and warrants issued by Accentia, although there is no guarantee that such debentures and/or
warrants will be converted or exercised, and such debentures and warrants are also alternatively convertible or exercisable for shares of Accentia common stock. These 18.0 million shares of our common stock have been placed into an escrow
account by Accentia pursuant to a Pledge Agreement and may under certain circumstances be obtained by the Purchasers in exchange for outstanding indebtedness, in connection with the exercise of Warrants issued to the Purchasers by Accentia, or in
payment of sums due from Accentia to the Purchasers.

On October 31, 2006, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Accentia whereby we
purchased Accentias 70.5% ownership interest in Biolender. In consideration of the sale of this interest in Biolender, we issued to Accentia ten million shares of our common stock, representing the negotiated value of the purchased interest.

On December 8, 2006, we, through our subsidiary, AutovaxID, closed a second NMTC financing transaction
(the Transaction). In the Transaction, AutovaxID entered into a QLICI Loan Agreement in which St. Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund-II, LLC (the CDE) made a loan to AutovaxID, evidenced by a Subordinated Promissory Note
dated as of December 8, 2006, in the principal amount of $7.7 million (CDE Loan). The CDE Loan has a maturity date of December 8, 2036 and is described in more detail below, qualified entirely by the QLICI Loan Agreement
attached as an exhibit. The following parties were involved in the Transaction: AutovaxID, Accentia, our majority shareholder, Biolender II, LLC, the CDE, St. Louis Development Corporation (SLDC), AutovaxID Investment LLC (Leverage
Fund), U.S. Bancorp Community Investment Corporation (USBCIC) and Laurus. In contemplation of the Transaction, we formed Biolender II, LLC (Biolender II) as a Delaware limited liability company. On December 8,
2006, $2.5 million was released from the Restricted Account created under the Laurus Note, which together with the amount loaned to us under the Accentia Note funded the purchase of a 100% equity interest in Biolender II for our benefit. The entire
equity interest in Biolender II owned by us has been pledged to Laurus as collateral to secure the Laurus Note.

Under a License and Asset
Purchase Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, we granted a nonexclusive license to the intellectual property enabling AutovaxID to manufacture and sell automated cell culture instruments in the United States, Canada and Mexico
(the License), which license became exclusive upon the occupancy by AutovaxID of a space located at 1031 Macklind Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri (the New Plant). We also agreed to sell AutovaxID certain equipment
(the Equipment) to AutovaxID upon the occupancy by AutovaxID of the New Plant. AutovaxID obtained a Certificate of Occupancy in June 2007. As full purchase price for the License and related business opportunity, AutovaxID paid us
$5.6 million. We also agreed to sell AutovaxID certain equipment upon the occupancy by AutovaxID of the New Plant for the fair market value of $0.5 million.

On December 8, 2006, Accentia loaned to us $3.1 million pursuant to a Secured Promissory Note (the Accentia Note). Under the terms of
the Accentia Note, interest shall accrue at a rate equal to prime rate, payable upon demand of Accentia. We paid to Accentia $1.1 million upon the closing of the Transaction and the remaining $2.0 million of principal and all accrued and unpaid
interest shall be paid by us upon demand by Accentia.



69



---

##### Table of Contents

Upon the completion of the funding of Biolender II by us and receipt of $2.4 million from USBCIC via an
equity investment in the Leverage Fund, Biolender II and the Leverage Fund entered into a Loan and Security Agreement pursuant to which Biolender II made a loan to the Leverage Fund in the principal amount of $5.6 million (the Leverage
Loan), evidenced by a promissory note dated as of December 8, 2006 payable from the Leverage Fund to Biolender II (the Leverage Note). The Leverage Note becomes due on July 9, 2014.

In connection with the Transaction, seven individuals personally guaranteed certain of our obligations regarding the Transaction. This included the
guarantees of Francis E. ODonnell, our Vice-Chairman and Director, together with certain related entities, for $1.15 million, Ronald E. Osman, Esq., a Director, for $1.0 million, and Steven Arikian, our President, CEO, Chairman and
Director for $50,000. In addition, we received guarantees by four other individual common shareholders of Accentia. As consideration for these guarantees, we issued seven warrants on December 8, 2006 to issue a total of 2,629,543 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, vesting in their entirety on December 14, 2006 and expiring on December 13, 2016. These include warrants to Hopkins II, Osman and Arikian for the purchase of 679,545, 590,909, and
29,545 shares of common stock, respectively.

SLDC has used a portion of the credits allocation transaction fee it received from us in order
to purchase 326,098 shares of our common stock, valued at $1.10 per share. We issued these shares to SLDC under a transaction that was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), by virtue
of Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. Such sale and issuance did not involve a public offering, was made without general solicitation or advertising, and St. Louis Development Corporation is an accredited investor with access to all
relevant information necessary to evaluate the investment, representing to us that the common stock was being acquired for investment.

On
January 16, 2007, we issued a promissory note to Pulaski Bank in the amount of $1.0 million. This loan bears interest at prime less 0.5% (7.0% as of December 1, 2007) and was originally payable July 5, 2007. The maturity date of the
note was subsequently extended on three separate occasions to December 31, 2007. We paid $75,000 in cash as well as warrants to purchase 152,992 shares of our common stock at $1.10 per share to Pulaski in consideration for this extension. The
note is an unsecured obligation and is subordinated to our outstanding loan to Laurus. The note is guaranteed by entities and individuals affiliated with us or Accentia, our majority stockholder. We have entered into Indemnification Agreements with
each of the guarantors. In the event of default, resulting in a payment to Pulaski Bank by the guarantors, we have agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by issuance of that number of shares of our restricted common stock determined by
dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10.

On March 22, 2007, we issued an additional promissory note to Pulaski Bank in the
amount of $0.75 million. This loan bears interest at prime less 0.5% (7.0% as of December 1, 2007) and had an original maturity date of April 21, 2007. The maturity date of the note was subsequently extended to December 31, 2007. We
paid $112,500 in cash as well as warrants to purchase 109,508 shares of our common stock at $1.10 per share to Pulaski Bank in consideration for this extension. The note is an unsecured obligation and is subordinated to our outstanding loan to
Laurus. The note is guaranteed by entities and individuals affiliated with us or Accentia, our majority stockholder. We have entered into Indemnification Agreements with each of the guarantors. In the event of default, resulting in a payment to
Pulaski Bank by the guarantors, we have agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by issuance of that number of shares of our restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10.

On June 26, 2007, we issued a promissory note to Southwest Bank in the amount of $0.2 million. This loan bears interest at prime plus 1.0% (8.5% as
of December 1, 2007) and is payable December 26, 2008. The note is an unsecured obligation and is subordinated to our outstanding loan to Laurus. The note is guaranteed by entities and individuals affiliated with us or Accentia, our
majority stockholder. We have entered into Indemnification Agreements with each of the guarantors. In the event of default, resulting in a payment to Southwest Bank by the guarantor(s), we have agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by
issuance of that number of shares of our restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10.



70



---

##### Table of Contents

On September 11, 2007, we entered into loan documentation for two financing transactions with two of
our Directors, as follows:



| |  |  | We issued an Unsecured Promissory Note in the amount of $0.1 million to Francis E. ODonnell, Jr. M.D., our Chairman and CEO and also Chairman and
CEO of our parent, Accentia in consideration of a loan in the principal amount of $0.1 million to be used by us for operating expenses. This unsecured Note bears interest at prime rate plus 2.0%, is non-amortizing and payable in a single lump
sum of principal and accrued interest at maturity, and will mature at the earlier of the date of closing of a sale of our non-strategic assets with net proceeds of $5.0 million or greater or one year from the date of the Note.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | We issued an Unsecured Promissory Note in the amount of $0.1 million to Ronald Osman, our Director in consideration of a loan in the principal amount
of $0.1 million to be used by us for operating expenses. This unsecured Note bears interest at prime rate plus 2.0%, is non-amortizing and payable in a single lump sum of principal and accrued interest at maturity, and will mature at the earlier of
the date of closing of a sale of our non-strategic assets with net proceeds of $5.0 million or greater or one year from the date of the Note. In addition, we agreed to issue to Mr. Osman a Warrant to purchase up to 909,090 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share. The exercise price may be paid by Mr. Osman in cash or through a cashless exercise by surrendering a portion of the warrant or underlying warrant shares with a fair market value at the time of
exercise equal to the exercise price. The warrant will expire on September 5, 2014.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On September 26, 2007, we
entered into loan documentation for a financing transaction with one of our affiliates, as follows:



| |  |  | We issued an Unsecured Promissory Note in the amount of $46,015 to Dennis Ryll, M.D., a shareholder of Accentia in consideration of a loan in the
principal amount of $46,015 to be used by us for operating expenses. This unsecured Note bears interest at prime rate plus 2.0%, is non-amortizing and payable in a single lump sum of principal and accrued interest at maturity, and will mature on
May 31, 2008. In addition, we agreed to issue to Dr. Ryll a warrant to purchase up to 25,099 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share. The exercise price may be paid by Dr. Ryll in cash or through a cashless
exercise by surrendering a portion of the warrant or underlying warrant shares with a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the exercise price. The warrant will expire on September 30, 2012.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On October 12, 2007, we entered into loan documentation for a financing transaction with one of our Directors, as follows:



| |  |  | We issued an Unsecured Promissory Note in the amount of $0.3 million to Ronald Osman, one of our Directors in consideration of a loan in the principal
amount of $0.3 million to be used by us for operating expenses. This unsecured Note bears interest at prime rate plus 2.0%, is non-amortizing and payable in a single lump sum of principal and accrued interest at maturity, and will mature at the
earlier of the date of closing of a debt or equity financing by us with net proceeds of $5.0 million or greater or one year from the date of the Note. In addition, we agreed to issue to Mr. Osman a warrant to purchase up to 2,727,270 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share. The exercise price may be paid by Mr. Osman in cash or through a cashless exercise by surrendering a portion of the warrant or underlying warrant shares with a fair market value at the
time of exercise equal to the exercise price. The warrant will expire on October 11, 2014.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On October 30, 2007,
we completed a financing transaction with the Valens Funds, pursuant to which the Valens Funds purchased from us two secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $0.5 million and entered into two royalty agreements whereby the
Valens Funds have been granted 2.0% royalty interests in the worldwide net sales and license revenues from commercial sales of our biologic products. The notes are non-amortizing, accrue interest at prime plus 2.0%, and are payable in a single
payment of principal and accrued interest on March 31, 2009.

The December 10, 2007, we completed two financing transactions
pursuant to which the Valens Funds purchased from us two secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $8.5 million and entered into two royalty agreements whereby the Valens Funds have been granted 7% royalty interests in the
worldwide net sales and license revenues from commercial sales of our biologic products. The notes are non-amortizing, accrue interest at prime plus 2%, with a minimum interest rate of 11%, and are payable in a single payment of principal and
accrued interest on June 10, 2008.

On February 5, 2008, we modified the terms of intercompany demand notes payable to Accentia to
allow Accentia the option to convert part or all of the principal and interest due into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $1.10 per share (the Conversion Price) subject to adjustment in the event of certain
recapitalizations or in the event of the sale of our stock at prices below the Conversion Price. We granted piggyback and demand registration rights to Accentia for the shares, underlying this Conversion Option.



71



---

##### Table of Contents

On May 9, 2008, we entered into a financing transaction with one of our directors, whereby we issued a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $1.0 million, bearing interest at 10% and with a maturity date of the earlier to occur of one year from the date of issuance, or, at the election of the lender, upon closing of a financing transaction
resulting in net proceeds of at least $15.0 million. Interest only is payable monthly and may be paid by issuance of our restricted common stock, calculated at a price of $0.32 per share. At any time after issuance of the note the lender may elect
to convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the note into our common stock, at a conversion price equal to $0.32 per share. As part of this transaction we issued to the lender a warrant to purchase up to
2.0 million shares of our common stock for a period of seven years at an exercise price of $0.32 per share, with cashless exercise provisions. In addition, we entered into an option agreement with the lender whereby the lender may elect, at any
time before the earlier to occur of i) notice of a signed term sheet for a financing of specified magnitude or ii) maturity of the note as defined therein, to increase his loan by an amount of up to the full original loan amount ($1.0 million) upon
the same terms as contained in the original note, including issuance of additional warrants with the same term, exercise price, and cashless exercise provisions.

On June 12, 2008, we entered into a financing transaction with one of our directors, whereby we issued a convertible promissory note in the amount
of $0.2 million, bearing interest at 10% and with a maturity date of the earlier to occur of one year from the date of issuance, or, upon the repayment of a short term loan we provided to Accentia in the amount of $0.2 million. On June 25,
2008, having received repayment of our short term loan to Accentia in the amount of $0.2 million, we repaid the principal amount due under this note. Interest was payable monthly and was paid by issuance of our restricted common stock, calculated at
a price of $0.32 per share. As part of this transaction we issued to the lender a warrant to purchase up to 0.4 million shares of our common stock for a period of seven years at an exercise price of $0.32 per share, with cashless exercise
provisions.

Effective as of May 30, 2008, we entered into an agreement with the Valens Funds whereby the Valens Funds agreed to extend
the maturity date of the secured promissory notes from the from their initial maturity date of June 10, 2008 to October 31, 2008 (the Extension). In consideration for the Extension, we entered into an amendment to the
December 2007 Royalty Agreement with the Valens Funds (the Royalty Amendment) whereby the total royalty percentage due to the Valens Funds was increased from 9.0% to 15.5%.

On July 31, 2008, we again extended the maturity date of all debt outstanding to Laurus and the Valens Funds. This included total debt in the
principal amount of $14.6 million consisting of the remaining principal outstanding on: 1) the $7.8 million note closed in March 2006; 2) the $0.5 million notes closed in October 2007; and 3) the $8.5 million notes closed in December 2007. Under the
terms of the restructuring, maturities of all the notes were extended to July 31, 2009, and will carry no amortizing payments until maturity. Interest on all principal outstanding was amended to 30% per annum, with 10% payable monthly and
20% accruing and payable at maturity. We also agreed to pay an additional $4.4 million fee on the notes, payable at maturity.

On
September 22, 2008, we entered into definitive agreements with three investors, all of whom are related parties, related to a private placement of 15% Secured Convertible Debentures (the Debentures) and sold $1.15 million in
principal amount of the Debentures to these related parties.

On September 26, 2008, we agreed to issue to two of the purchasers of the
Debentures warrants to purchase a total of 0.625 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, vested immediately with a five-year term. These warrants were issued in consideration of the agreement of these
purchasers to extend the maturity date of certain existing promissory notes which had previously reached maturity.

On December 22, 2008,
we completed the closing of the DIP Transaction with the DIP Lender. Pursuant to the transaction, the DIP Lender provided to us a secured line of credit in an amount of up to $3.0 million in accordance with an order entered by Bankruptcy Court. As
of March 31, 2010, the DIP Lender has advanced $1.4 million to us, with additional advances being subject to the DIP Lenders discretion and further order of the Bankruptcy Court.

The DIP Financing was memorialized by a Secured Promissory Note (the DIP Note) and Security Agreement dated December 22, 2008. The
following describes certain material terms of the DIP Transaction:



| | (a) | Principal Amount- Up to $3.0 million.
| | --- | -------------------------------------



| | (b) | Priority and Security- The Facility is a secured super-priority loan to a Debtor-in-Possession and is secured by all of our assets that is senior to all of our prior
and existing liens.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



72



---

##### Table of Contents

| | (c) | Advances under the Facility- For all amounts in excess of the $1.4 million currently outstanding, the parties shall within 30 days of the entry of the Initial Order
agree on a list of milestone events to be achieved by us through use of these Advances, and we shall be required to make a written request(s) detailing the amount and use and DIP Lender shall in its reasonable discretion approve or
reject the written request based upon whether we demonstrate reasonable progress in achieving the agreed milestones.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | Term- All loans outstanding under the Facility (the Loans)shall become due and payable on the earlier of: (i) December 31, 2010;
(ii) dismissal of the Chapter 11 Proceeding; (iii) conversion of the Chapter 11 Proceeding to a Chapter 7 Proceeding; or (iv) confirmation of our Plan of Reorganization.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (e) | Interest- Loans will bear interest at 16% per annum computed on a daily basis based on the amounts outstanding. Interest shall be paid as follows: (i) 10%
interest shall be paid monthly and (ii) 6% interest shall accrue and be paid at maturity.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (f) | Points- At the Closing, we paid in cash 4% of the initial $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that we borrowed in excess of $1.0 million, we paid in
cash 4% of the second $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that we borrow in excess of $2.0 million, we shall pay in cash 4% of the third $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000).
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (g) | Expenses- We issued payment of $25,000 in costs at the Closing.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| | (h) | Prepayment- Loans may be prepaid at any time in an amount of $50,000 or multiples of $50,000 in excess thereof, provided, however, that our senior secured lender
(Laurus and the Valens Funds) provides its consent to each prepayment via written notification to us and the DIP Lender.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Director Independence

The Board has determined that Dr. Raphael Mannino, Ph.D., Mr. John Sitilides, Dr. Jeffrey Scott, M.D., Dr. Christopher
Chapman, M.D. and Mr. Robert Weiss are independent, as that term is defined by the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC® (NASDAQ). The Board has further determined that all members of the Audit, Compensation, and
Governance & Nominating Committees are independent and satisfy the relevant Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ independence requirements and other requirements for members of such committees.



|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|-------- | --------------------------------------

We engaged Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, LLP f/k/a Aidman, Piser & Company (Cherry Bekaert) to perform the audit of the
September 30, 2009 and 2008 financial statements. We engaged Pender, Newkirk and Company, LLP to prepare the 2009 and 2008 income tax return.

The following table provides information relating to the fees billed for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:



|                   |  |      |         |      |   |        
|------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                   |  | 2009 |         | 2008
|Audit fees (1)     |  | $    | 125,000 |      | $ | 125,000
|Audit-related fees |  |      |        |      |   |       
|Tax fees (2)       |  |      | n/a     |      |   | n/a    
|All other fees     |  | $    |        |      | $ |       



|(1) | Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, review of the interim condensed financial statements,
and other professional services rendered in connection with our registration statements and services that are normally provided by Cherry Bekaert in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | During fiscal 2009 and 2008, we engaged Pender, Newkirk and Company, LLP to prepare our tax returns
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Policy on Board of Directors Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors in order to assure
that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors independence. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any
pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. Management is required to periodically report to the Board of Directors regarding the extent of services provided by the
independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All such services and fees provided in fiscal 2009 were pre-approved by the Board of Directors.



73



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV



|ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|-------- | ------------------------------------------

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(1) Financial Statements

See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.

(2) Supplemental Schedules

Schedule II  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (see last page of Consolidated Financial Statements)

All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the
schedule, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)
Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form
10-K:



|              |  |                                                                                         
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                             
|3.1           |  | Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (1)                                 
|              | 
|3.2           |  | Amended Bylaws of the Company (1)                                                       
|              | 
|10.1          |  | Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Unisyn Technologies, Inc. (2)          
|              | 
|10.2          |  | Settlement Agreement between the Company and Hambrecht & Quist Guaranty Finance, LLC (2)
|              | 
|10.3          |  | Settlement Agreement between the Company and Latham & Watkins (2)                       
|              | 
|10.4          |  | Agreement between the Company and Bridge Partners III (3)                               
|              | 
|10.5          |  | Biovest International, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (4)                                  
|              | 
|10.6          |  | Press release dated April 15, 2003 (5)                                                  
|              | 
|10.7          |  | Investment Agreement dated April 10, 2003 (6)                                           
|              | 
|10.8          |  | Termination Compensation Agreement dated April 24, 2003 with George Constantin (10)     
|              | 
|10.9          |  | Amendment to Investment Agreement dated June 16, 2003 (6)                               
|              | 
|10.10         |  | Escrow Agreement dated June 16, 2003 (6)                                                
|              | 
|10.11         |  | Promissory Note in principal amount of $2,500,000 payable to the Company (6)            
|              | 
|10.12         |  | Promissory Note in principal amount of $15,000,000 payable to the Company (6)           
|              | 
|10.13         |  | Promissory Note to Othon Mourkakos (6)                                                  
|              | 
|10.14         |  | Promissory Note to Christopher Kyriakides (6)                                           
|              | 
|10.15         |  | Promissory Note to Peter Pappas (6)                                                     
|              | 
|10.16         |  | Promissory Note to Angelo Tsakopoulos (6)                                               
|              | 
|10.17         |  | Agreement regarding first right of refusal (6)                                          
|              | 
|10.18         |  | Promissory Note in principal amount of $885,538.47 payable to Cohen, et al. (6)         
|              | 
|10.19         |  | Security Agreement (6)                                                                  
|              | 
|10.20         |  | Resignation of directors                                                                
|              | 
|              |  | Othon Mourkakos (6)                                                                     
|              | 
|              |  | David DeFouw, PhD (6)                                                                   
|              | 
|              |  | George Constantin (6)                                                                   



74



---

##### Table of Contents

|      |  |                                                                                                                                                    
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.21 |  | Letter from Lazar Levine & Felix LLP, former independent auditors, regarding its concurrence or disagreement with the statements in this report (7)
|      | 
|10.22 |  | Incentive Stock Option Agreement  P. Pappas ($0.25 / share) (8)                                                                                   
|      | 
|10.23 |  | Incentive Stock Option Agreement  P. Pappas ($0.50 / share) (8)                                                                                   
|      | 
|10.24 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  P. Pappas (8)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.25 |  | Incentive Stock Option Agreement  D. Moser (8)                                                                                                    
|      | 
|10.26 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  C. Kyriakides (8)                                                                                                  
|      | 
|10.27 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  O. Mourkakos (8)                                                                                                   
|      | 
|10.28 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  A. TsaKopoulos (8)                                                                                                 
|      | 
|10.29 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  T. Belleau (8)                                                                                                     
|      | 
|10.30 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant  D. DeFouw (8)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.31 |  | Master Contract Services Agreement (8)                                                                                                             
|      | 
|10.32 |  | Amendment to Promissory Note in the principal amount of $2,500,000 dated June 16, 2003 (9)                                                         
|      | 
|10.33 |  | Amended and Restated Amendment to Promissory Note (9)                                                                                              
|      | 
|10.34 |  | Amended and Restated Amendment to Escrow Agreement (9)                                                                                             
|      | 
|10.35 |  | Amendment to Escrow Agreement (9)                                                                                                                  
|      | 
|10.36 |  | Code of Ethics (10)                                                                                                                                
|      | 
|10.37 |  | Employment Agreement with Dr. Stephane Allard (10)                                                                                                 
|      | 
|10.38 |  | Employment Agreement with James McNulty, CPA (10)                                                                                                  
|      | 
|10.39 |  | Employment Agreement with James Wachholz (10)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.40 |  | Employment Agreement with Richard Sakowicz (10)                                                                                                    
|      | 
|10.41 |  | Employment Agreement with Samuel Duffey, Esq. (10)                                                                                                 
|      | 
|10.42 |  | Employment Agreement with Julian Casciano (10)                                                                                                     
|      | 
|10.43 |  | Press release dated March 25, 2004 (11)                                                                                                            
|      | 
|10.44 |  | Certificate of Incorporation of Biovax, Inc.(11)                                                                                                   
|      | 
|10.45 |  | Bylaws of Biovax, Inc. (Biovax) (11)                                                                                                             
|      | 
|10.46 |  | Charter for Audit Committee (11)                                                                                                                   
|      | 
|10.47 |  | Insider Trading Policy (11)                                                                                                                        
|      | 
|10.48 |  | Delegation of Authority Policy (11)                                                                                                                
|      | 
|10.49 |  | Financial Consulting Agreement with Andreas Zigouras (11)                                                                                          
|      | 
|10.50 |  | Common Stock Warrant to Andreas Zigouras (11)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.51 |  | Release of Claim & Settlement Agreement (Warburton) (12)                                                                                           
|      | 
|10.52 |  | IND Transfer Letter Dated April 27, 2004 (13)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.53 |  | Second Amendment to Investment Agreement (14)                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.54 |  | Biologic Products Commercialization Agreement (14)                                                                                                 
|      | 
|10.55 |  | Line of Credit Promissory Note (14)                                                                                                                
|      | 
|10.56 |  | General Security Agreement (14)                                                                                                                    
|      | 
|10.57 |  | Masters Service Agreement With PPDI (15)                                                                                                           



75



---

##### Table of Contents

|      |  |                                                                                                                       
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      | 
|10.58 |  | Project Addendum PPDI (15)                                                                                            
|      | 
|10.59 |  | Confidentiality & Non-Compete Agreement with Carl Cohen, Ph.D. (1)                                                    
|      | 
|10.60 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Christos Soras (16)                                            
|      | 
|10.61 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Con. & Mary Soras (16)                                         
|      | 
|10.62 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Dillon (16)                                                    
|      | 
|10.63 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Kit Ching Wong (16)                                            
|      | 
|10.64 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Konstantinidis (16)                                            
|      | 
|10.65 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Korahais (16)                                                  
|      | 
|10.66 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Kyriakides (16)                                                
|      | 
|10.67 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Lignos (16)                                                    
|      | 
|10.68 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Logan (16)                                                     
|      | 
|10.69 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Mourkakos (16)                                                 
|      | 
|10.70 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Pappas (16)                                                    
|      | 
|10.71 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Pensa (16)                                                     
|      | 
|10.72 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Prakash (16)                                                   
|      | 
|10.73 |  | Agreement regarding Conversion of Promissory Note with Tsakopoulos (16)                                               
|      | 
|10.74 |  | Clarification Agreement (16)                                                                                          
|      | 
|10.75 |  | Investment Banking Engagement Agreement (16)                                                                          
|      | 
|10.76 |  | Modification of Gunn Allen Engagement Agreement (16)                                                                  
|      | 
|10.77 |  | Termination Compensation Agreement between the Company and Dr. Stephane Allard (17)                                   
|      | 
|10.78 |  | Employment Agreement between the Company and Carl Cohen, Ph.D. (17)                                                   
|      | 
|10.79 |  | Engagement Agreement dated January 7, 2006 between the Company and Investor Relations Group, Inc. (17)                
|      | 
|10.80 |  | Warrant dated January 7, 2006 from the Company to Investor Relations Group, Inc. (17)                                 
|      | 
|10.81 |  | Settlement Agreement dated February 13, 2006 between the Company and Dr. Robert Pfeffer (17)                          
|      | 
|10.82 |  | Promissory Note dated February 13, 2006 between the Company and Dr. Robert Pfeffer (17)                               
|      | 
|10.83 |  | Release from Dr. Robert Pfeffer to the Company (17)                                                                   
|      | 
|10.84 |  | Release from the Company to Dr. Robert Pfeffer (17)                                                                   
|      | 
|10.85 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to Carl Cohen, Ph.D. (17)                       
|      | 
|10.86 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to James McNulty, CPA (17)                      
|      | 
|10.87 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to Samuel Duffey, Esq. (17)                     
|      | 
|10.88 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to Steven Arikian, M.D. (17)                    
|      | 
|10.89 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to David Moser (17)                             
|      | 
|10.90 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to Robert Weiss (17)                            
|      | 
|10.91 |  | Incentive Stock Option Grant dated February 10, 2006 from the Company to Angelos Stergiou M.D (17)                    
|      | 
|10.92 |  | Secured Promissory Note Dated December 1, 2005 from the Company to Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia) (17)
|      | 
|10.93 |  | Secured Promissory Note Dated December 31, 2005 from the Company to Accentia (17)                                     



76



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.94  |  | Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, between the Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (Laurus) (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.95  |  | Secured Promissory Note, dated March 31, 2006, issued by the Company to Laurus (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.96  |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated March 31, 2006, issued by the Company to Laurus (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.97  |  | Restricted Account Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, among the Company, Laurus, and North Fork Bank (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|       | 
|10.98  |  | Restricted Account Letter Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, the Company and Laurus (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.99  |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, between the Company and Laurus (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|       | 
|10.100 |  | Master Security Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, among Laurus, the Company, and Biovax (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.101 |  | Stock Pledge Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, between Laurus and Accentia (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.102 |  | Guaranty, dated March 31, 2006, made by Accentia in favor of Laurus (18)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|       | 
|10.103 |  | Amended and Restated Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2005 and amended and restated as of April 25, 2006, among Laurus, Accentia and each other Pledgor party
thereto (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|       | 
|10.104 |  | Demand Note, dated April 21, 2006, issued by the Company to Laurus (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|       | 
|10.105 |  | First Bank Subordination Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, by and among Laurus, First Bank (First Bank) and Accentia (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.106 |  | Telesis Subordination Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, by and among Laurus, Telesis CDE Two, LLC (Telesis CDE), Biovax, the Company and Accentia.
(19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.107 |  | Promissory Note, dated April 25, 2006, issued by Biovax Investment LLC (Leverage Fund) to Biolender, LLC (Biolender) (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.108 |  | Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, between Leverage Fund and Biolender (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.109 |  | Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note, dated April 25, 2006, from Biovax to Telesis CDE (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.110 |  | Convertible Loan Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, by and among Biovax, Telesis CDE and the Company (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.111 |  | Guaranty, dated April 25, 2006, made by Frances E. ODonnell, Jr., Kathleen M. ODonnell (as Trustee of the Frances E. ODonnell, Jr. Irrevocable Trust), Dennis
L. Ryll, Ronald Osman, Steven J. Stogel, Donald L. Ferguson, Donald L. Ferguson (as trustee of the Donald L. Ferguson Revocable Trust), the Company and Accentia in favor of U.S. Bancorp Community Investment Corporation (USBCIC) and
Telesis CDE (19)
|       | 
|10.112 |  | Limited Liability Company Agreement of Biolender, dated April 25, 2006, between the Company and Accentia (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.113 |  | Put Option Agreement dated April 25, 2006, between Biovax, Leverage Fund, USBCIC and Biolender (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.114 |  | Purchase Option Agreement dated April 25, 2006, between Biovax, Leverage Fund, USBCIC and Biolender (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|       | 
|10.115 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by the Company to Telesis CDE (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.116 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by Accentia to Telesis CDE (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.117 |  | Tax Credit Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, between Biovax and USBCIC (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.118 |  | Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2006 between the Company and Biovax (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.119 |  | Vaccine Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2006, between Biovax and the Company (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.120 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, from the Company to Dennis Ryll (19)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                



77



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.121 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, from the Company to Steven Stogel (19)                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.122 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, from the Company to Donald Ferguson (19)                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.123 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, from the Company to Ronald Osman (19)                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.124 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006, from the Company to Francis ODonnell (19)                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.125 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by the Company to Ronald Osman (20)                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.126 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by the Company to Dennis Ryll (20)                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.127 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by the Company to Steven Stogel (20)                                                                                                                         
|       | 
|10.128 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 25, 2006, issued by the Company to Donald Ferguson (20)                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.129 |  | Press Release dated May 11, 2006 Announcing Fast Track Status for BiovaxID (20)                                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.130 |  | Press Release dated May 16, 2006 Announcing FDA Approval of Surrogate Endpoint for BiovaxID Clinical Trial (20)                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.131 |  | Amendment and Consent to Release dated August 2, 2006 (21)                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.132 |  | AutovaxID, Inc. (AutovaxID) Certificate of Incorporation Filed August 7, 2006 (22)                                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.133 |  | Promissory Note dated September 5, 2006, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company (Pulaski) (23)                                                                                                         
|       | 
|10.134 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated September 5, 2006, issued by the Company to Pulaski (23)                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.135 |  | Letter Terminating CRADA from the Company to National Cancer Institute dated September 25, 2006 (24)                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.136 |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 29, 2006, among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein (25)                                                                                                    
|       | 
|10.137 |  | Royalty Agreement Between the Company and Accentia, dated October 31, 2006 (27)                                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.138 |  | Termination Agreement Between the Company and Accentia, dated October 31, 2006 (27)                                                                                                                                      
|       | 
|10.139 |  | Biolender Purchase Agreement, dated October 31, 2006, between the Company and Accentia (27)                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.140 |  | Consent, dated October 31, 2006, among the Company, Biolender, AutovaxID and Laurus (27)                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.141 |  | License and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, between the Company and AutovaxID (26)                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.142 |  | License Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, between the Company and AutovaxID (26)                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.143 |  | Secured Promissory Note, dated as of December 8, 2006, made by the Company for the benefit of Accentia (26)                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.144 |  | Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, between Leverage Fund and Biolender II, LLC (Biolender II) (26)                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.145 |  | Promissory Note, dated December 8, 2006, issued by AutovaxID Investment LLC (Leverage Fund) to Biolender (26)                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.146 |  | Subordinated Promissory Note, dated December 8, 2006, from AutovaxID to the CDE (26)                                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.147 |  | QLICI Loan Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, by and among AutovaxID, the CDE and Biovest (26)                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.148 |  | Subordination Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, by and among Laurus, St. Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund-II, LLC (CDE), US Bancorp Community Investment
Corporation (USBCIC), AutovaxID and the Company (26)
|       | 
|10.149 |  | Second Lien Security Agreement, dated December 8, 2006, from AutovaxID to the CDE (26)                                                                                                                                   
|       | 
|10.150 |  | Tax Credit Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, between AutovaxID and USBCIC (26)                                                                                                        



78



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.151 |  | Guaranty, dated December 8, 2006, made by Hopkins Capital Group II, LLC, Frances E. ODonnell, Jr., Kathleen M. ODonnell (as Trustee of the Frances E.
ODonnell, Jr. Irrevocable Trust), Dennis L. Ryll, Ronald E. Osman, Alan M. Pearce, Steven R. Arikian, Steven J. Stogel, Donald L. Ferguson, Donald L. Ferguson (as trustee of the Donald L. Ferguson Revocable Trust)] and Biovest in favor of
USBCIC and the CDE (26)
|       | 
|10.152 |  | Limited Liability Company Agreement of Biolender II, dated December 8, 2006 (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.153 |  | Put Option Agreement dated December 8, 2006, between AutovaxID, Leverage Fund, USBCIC and Biolender II (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|       | 
|10.154 |  | Purchase Option Agreement dated December 8, 2006, between AutovaxID, Leverage Fund, USBCIC and Biolender II (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.155 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Dennis Ryll (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.156 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Steven Stogel (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.157 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Donald Ferguson (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.158 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Ronald Osman (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.159 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Francis ODonnell (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.160 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Alan Pearce (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.161 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006, from the Company to Steven Arikian (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.162 |  | Subscription Agreement, dated December 8, 2006, between the Company and SLDC (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.163 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Dennis Ryll (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.164 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Steven Stogel (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.165 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Donald Ferguson (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.166 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Ronald Osman (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.167 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Hopkins Capital Group II, LLC (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.168 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Alan Pearce (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.169 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 14, 2006 issued by the Company to Steven Arikian (26)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.170 |  | Promissory Note dated January 16, 2007, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.171 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 16, 2007, issued by the Company to Donald L. Ferguson (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.172 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 16, 2007, issued by the Company to Hopkins Capital Group II, LLC (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.173 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 16, 2007, issued by the Company to Ronald E. Osman (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.174 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 16, 2007, issued by the Company to Alan M. Pearce (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.175 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated January 16, 2007, issued by the Company to Dennis L. Ryll (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.176 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Donald L. Ferguson (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.177 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Hopkins Capital Group II, LLC (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.178 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Ronald E. Osman (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.179 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Alan M. Pearce (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.180 |  | Indemnification Agreement, dated January 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Dennis L. Ryll (27)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                



79



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.181 |  | Promissory Note dated March 22, 2007, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company (28)                                                
|       | 
|10.182 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company to Pulaski dated March 22, 2007 (28)                                                                       
|       | 
|10.183 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company to Peter Pappas and Catherine Pappas dated March 22, 2007 (28)                                             
|       | 
|10.184 |  | Indemnity Agreement from the Company to Peter Pappas and Catherine Pappas dated March 22, 2007 (28)                                              
|       | 
|10.185 |  | Letter-Agreement between the Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. Effective as of April 17, 2007 (29)                                            
|       | 
|10.186 |  | Agreement between American Defense International, Inc. and the Company dated February 8, 2007.(30)                                               
|       | 
|10.187 |  | Promissory Note between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company dated April 22, 2007 (30)                                                 
|       | 
|10.188 |  | Distribution Agreement dated June 8, 2007 between AutovaxID, Inc. and VWR International, Inc. (31)                                               
|       | 
|10.189 |  | Promissory Note dated June 26, 2007, between the Company and Southwest Bank Creve Couer Financial Center of St. Louis, MO (32)                   
|       | 
|10.190 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated June 26, 2007, issued by Biovest to Alan M. Pearce (32)                                                     
|       | 
|10.191 |  | Indemnity Agreement dated June 26, 2007 between Biovest and Alan M. Pearce (32)                                                                  
|       | 
|10.192 |  | Amended March 22, 2007 Promissory Note with Pulaski Bank and Trust Company of St. Louis, MO (Pulaski) and the Company dated April 22, 2007 (33)
|       | 
|10.193 |  | Second Amended March 22, 2007 Promissory Note with Pulaski and the Company dated May 21, 2007 (33)                                               
|       | 
|10.194 |  | Third Amended March 22, 2007 Promissory Note with Pulaski and the Company dated July 21, 2007 (33)                                               
|       | 
|10.195 |  | Amended January 16, 2007 Promissory Note with Pulaski and the Company dated July 5, 2007 (33)                                                    
|       | 
|10.196 |  | Subordinated Promissory Note with Philip E. Rosensweig and the Company dated September 10, 2007 (39)                                             
|       | 
|10.197 |  | Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with Philip E. Rosensweig and the Company dated September 10, 2007 (39)                                     
|       | 
|10.198 |  | Unsecured Promissory Note with Francis E. ODonnell, Jr. and the Company dated September 11, 2007 (39)                                           
|       | 
|10.199 |  | Unsecured Promissory Note with Ronald E. Osman and the Company dated September 11, 2007 (39)                                                     
|       | 
|10.200 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated September 11, 2007, issued by the Company to Ronald E. Osman (39)                                           
|       | 
|10.201 |  | Unsecured Promissory Note with Dennis L. Ryll and the Company dated October 1, 2007 (39)                                                         
|       | 
|10.202 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated October 1, 2007 issued by the Company to Dennis L. Ryll (39)                                                
|       | 
|10.203 |  | Promissory Note dated October 5, 2007, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company (39)                                               
|       | 
|10.204 |  | Unsecured Promissory Note dated October 12, 2007, between the Company and Ronald E. Osman (34)                                                   
|       | 
|10.205 |  | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated October 12, 2007, issued by the Company to Ronald E. Osman (34)                                             
|       | 
|10.206 |  | Promissory Note dated October 21, 2007, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company (39)                                              
|       | 
|10.207 |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated October 30, 2007, between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp (35)                                        
|       | 
|10.208 |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated October 30, 2007, between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (35)                                              
|       | 
|10.209 |  | Royalty Agreement dated October 30, 2007, between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (35)                                             
|       | 
|10.210 |  | Royalty Agreement dated October 30, 2007, between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (35)                                                    
|       | 
|10.211 |  | Secured Promissory Note dated October 30, 2007 between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (35)                                        
|       | 
|10.212 |  | Secured Promissory Note dated October 30, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (35)                                               
|       | 
|10.213 |  | Master Security Agreement dated October 30, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (35)          
|       | 
|10.214 |  | Amendment dated as of October 31, 2007 between the Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (35)                                                     



80



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.215 |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.216 |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (36)                                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.217 |  | Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.218 |  | Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. (36)                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.219 |  | Secured Promissory Note dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.220 |  | Secured Promissory Note dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC (36)                                                                                                                                         
|       | 
|10.221 |  | Master Security Agreement dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.222 |  | Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                      
|       | 
|10.223 |  | Guaranty dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (36)                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.224 |  | Amendment to Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (39)                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.225 |  | Amendment to Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007, between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. (39)                                                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.226 |  | Side Letter dated December 10, 2007, between the Company, Laurus, Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (39)                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.227 |  | Amendment Letter dated December 17, 2007, between the Company and Dennis L. Ryll (39)                                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.228 |  | Sublicense Agreement dated January 16, 2008 between the Company and Revimmune, LLC (40)                                                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.229 |  | Amendment Letter effective January 31, 2008 to Royalty Agreement dated October 31, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. (41)                                                                                                
|       | 
|10.230 |  | Amendment Letter effective January 31, 2008 to Royalty Agreement dated October 31, 2007 between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (41)                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.231 |  | Amendment Letter effective January 31, 2008 to Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC. (41)                                                                                               
|       | 
|10.232 |  | Amendment Letter effective January 31, 2008 to Royalty Agreement dated December 10, 2007 between the Company and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (41)                                                                                         
|       | 
|10.233 |  | Amendment and clarification of Accentia Royalty Agreement dated February 5, 2008 between the Company and Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (41)                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.234 |  | Conversion Agreement dated February 5, 2008 between the Company and Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (41)                                                                                                                                  
|       | 
|10.235 |  | Amendment Letter dated May 30, 2008 between the Company, Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (42)                                                                                                                      
|       | 
|10.236 |  | December 10, 2007 Royalty Agreement Amendment dated May 30, 2008 between the Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, Valens U.S. SPV I, Ltd., Valens Offshore
SPV II, Corp., and PSource Structured Debt Limited. (42)



81



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.237 |  | Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement dated May 30, 2008 between the Company and its subsidiaries, Revimmune LLC, LV Administrative Services, Inc., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC,
and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (42)                                                                                                                                         
|       | 
|10.238 |  | Guaranty Side Letter dated May 30, 2008 between Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, Valens U.S. SPV I, Ltd., Valens Offshore SPV II,
Corp., Valens Offshore SPV II, LLC and PSource Structured Debt Limited. (42)                                                                                            
|       | 
|10.239 |  | Promissory Note dated as of June 30, 2008, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. (43)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.240 |  | Promissory Note dated as of June 30, 2008, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. (43)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.241 |  | Amendment Agreement dated July 31, 2008 between the Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and
PSource Structured Debt Limited. (43)                                                                                                                                        
|       | 
|10.242 |  | Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement dated July 31, 2008 between the Company and its subsidiaries, Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and Revimmune LLC and LV Administrative
Services, Inc., as Agent, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., PSource Structured Debt Limited. (43)
|       | 
|10.243 |  | Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 19, 2008, among Biovest and each of the purchasers of the Private Placement. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|       | 
|10.244 |  | Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 19, 2008, among Biovest and each of the purchasers of the Private Placement. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|       | 
|10.245 |  | Form of Secured Convertible Debenture among Biovest and each of the purchasers of the Private Placement. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.246 |  | Form of Security Agreement, dated September 19, 2008, among Biovest and each of the purchasers of the Private Placement. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|       | 
|10.247 |  | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|       | 
|10.248 |  | Form of Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated September 19, 2008, among Biovest and each of the purchasers of the Private Placement. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.249 |  | Form of Subordination Agreement between Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia) and Senior Lenders of Biovest dated September 19, 2008. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.250 |  | Form of Subordination Agreement between Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia) and the purchasers of the Private Placement dated September 19, 2008.
(44)                                                                                                                                                                                             
|       | 
|10.251 |  | Form of Subordination Agreement between the purchasers of the Private Placement and Senior Lenders of the Company dated September 19, 2008. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|       | 
|10.252 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company to Ronald E. Osman dated September 26, 2008. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|       | 
|10.253 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company t to Ronald E. Osman dated September 26, 2008. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|       | 
|10.254 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company t to Francis E. ODonnell, Jr. dated September 26, 2008. (44)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.255 |  | Promissory Note dated as of September 30, 2008, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. (45)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  



82



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.256 |  | Promissory Note dated as of September 30, 2008, between the Company and Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. (45)                                     
|       | 
|10.257 |  | Common Stock Warrant from the Company to Philip E. Rosensweig dated October 15, 2008. (45)                                                       
|       | 
|10.258 |  | Secured Promissory Note between Corps Real, LLC and Biovest dated December 22, 2008 (46)                                                         
|       | 
|10.259 |  | Security Agreement between Corps Real, LLC and Biovest dated December 22, 2008 (46)                                                              
|       | 
|31.1   |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/(15(d)-14(a)                                                                 
|       | 
|31.2   |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/(15(d)-14(a)                                                                 
|       | 
|32.1   |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
|       | 
|32.2   |  | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003  





|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2004                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2000.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(3)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2000, which was filed on January 16,
2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(4)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2001, which was filed on May 21, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(5)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(6)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(7)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(8)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10- QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, which was filed on August 19,
2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(9)  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 22, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(10) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K dated January 13, 2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(11) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 29, 2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(12) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, which was filed on February 19,
2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(13) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, which was filed on May 24, 2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(14) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, which was filed on August 23, 2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(15) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(16) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, which was filed on January 13, 2006. Signed
originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|(17) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, which was filed on February 21,
2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(18) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(19) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 2, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(20) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, which was filed on May 22, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(21) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(22) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, which was filed on August 21, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(23) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         



83



---

##### Table of Contents

|     |  |                                                                                                                                                            
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(24) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2006.                                                            
|(25) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 11, 2006.                                                              
|(26) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2006.                                                             
|(27) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, which was filed on December 29,
2006.
|(28) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2007.                                                              
|(29) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 28, 2007.                                                                
|(30) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2007.                                                                
|(31) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 2007 which was filed on May 15, 2007.                    
|(32) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 13, 2007.                                                                 
|(33) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2007.                                                                 
|(34) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 10-Q for period ended June 30, 2007 which was filed on August 14, 2007.                  
|(35) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 12, 2007.                                                            
|(36) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2007.                                                              
|(37) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2007.                                                              
|(38) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 11, 2007.                                                             
|(39) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 10-K dated December 28, 2007.                                                            
|(40) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2008.                                                              
|(41) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 6, 2008                                                               
|(42) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 5, 2008                                                                   
|(43) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2008                                                                 
|(44) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2008                                                             
|(45) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2008                                                               
|(46) |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 23, 2008                                                              

Reports on Form 8-K

Current Report on Form
8-K dated October 18, 2007

Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2007

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 11, 2007

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 6, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 5, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 11, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 14, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 21, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 7, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 29, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2008



84



---

##### Table of Contents

Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 23, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 24, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 20, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 20, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 23, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 14, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2010



85



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:

/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/ Alan M. PearceChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)


Date: July 8,
2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Company and in the capacities and as of the date indicated:



|    |  |                                                               |  |                                                                                        |  |             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|    |  | Signature                                                     |  | Title                                                                                  |  | Date        
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.
Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D. |  | Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director (Principal Executive Officer) |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Alan M. Pearce
Alan M. Pearce                             |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Christopher C. Chapman
Christopher C. Chapman, M.D.       |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Raphael J. Mannino
Raphael J. Mannino, Ph.D.              |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Peter J. Pappas, Sr.
Peter J. Pappas, Sr.                 |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. Scott
Jeffrey A. Scott, M.D.                   |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ John Sitilides
John Sitilides                             |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010
|    |  |                                                               | 
|By: |  | /s/ Ronald E. Osman
Ronald E. Osman, Esquire                  |  | Director                                                                               |  | July 8, 2010



86



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Financial Statements



|                                                                                                  |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|                                                                                                  |  | Page
|Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm                                 |  | F-1 
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008                                     |  | F-2 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008             |  | F-3 
|Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Deficit for the years ended September 
30, 2009 and 2008 |  | F-4 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008             |  | F-5 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                        |  | F-7 



---

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Biovest International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Tampa, Florida

We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Biovest International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows for each of the years
then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis of designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Biovest International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and their consolidated results of operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred cumulative net losses since inception of approximately $131.0 million and cash used in operating activities of approximately $10.2 million during the two
years ended September 30, 2009, and had a working capital deficiency of approximately $54.3 million at September 30, 2009. These factors, among others as discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, raise substantial doubt
about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 4. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, on November 10, 2008, Biovest
International, Inc. and subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

/s/
CHERRY BEKAERT & HOLLAND L.L.P.

Tampa,
Florida

July 7, 2010



F-1



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------------ | - | ---- | - | ------------ | -
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | September 30, |             
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | 2009          |              |   | 2008 |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                               |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                      |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Cash                                                                                                                                                 |  | $             | 226,000      |   |      | $ | 539,000      |  
|Accounts receivable, net of $8,000 and $10,000 allowance for doubtful accounts at September 30, 2009 and
2008                                        |  |               | 207,000      |   |      |   | 281,000      |  
|Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts                                                                          |  |               | 251,000      |   |      |   | 103,000      |  
|Inventories                                                                                                                                          |  |               | 509,000      |   |      |   | 609,000      |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                                                                            |  |               | 138,000      |   |      |   | 243,000      |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                 |  |               | 1,331,000    |   |      |   | 1,775,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |              
|Property and equipment, net                                                                                                                          |  |               | 81,000       |   |      |   | 562,000      |  
|Patents and trademarks, net                                                                                                                          |  |               | 290,000      |   |      |   | 320,000      |  
|Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocated to identifiable assets                                                                           |  |               | 2,131,000    |   |      |   | 2,131,000    |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                         |  |               | 240,000      |   |      |   | 275,000      |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                         |  | $             | 4,073,000    |   |      | $ | 5,063,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT                                                                                                                |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Liabilities not subject to compromise:                                                                                                               |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                 |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Notes payable                                                                                                                                        |  | $             |             |   |      | $ | 14,358,000   |  
|Current maturities of long-term debt                                                                                                                 |  |               |             |   |      |   | 9,623,000    |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                     |  |               | 446,000      |   |      |   | 3,393,000    |  
|Customer deposits                                                                                                                                    |  |               | 159,000      |   |      |   | 131,000      |  
|Accrued liabilities                                                                                                                                  |  |               | 311,000      |   |      |   | 1,446,000    |  
|Notes payable, related parties                                                                                                                       |  |               | 1,664,000    |   |      |   | 7,880,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                            |  |               | 2,580,000    |   |      |   | 36,831,000   |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |              
|Long-term debt, less current maturities                                                                                                              |  |               |             |   |      |   | 62,000       |  
|Royalty liability, less current portion                                                                                                              |  |               |             |   |      |   | 5,143,000    |  
|Derivative liabilities                                                                                                                               |  |               |             |   |      |   | 905,000      |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total liabilities not subject to compromise                                                                                                          |  |               | 2,580,000    |   |      |   | 42,941,000   |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |              
|Liabilities subject to compromise (Note 1)                                                                                                           |  |               | 53,980,000   |   |      |   |             |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                    |  |               | 56,560,000   |   |      |   | 42,941,000   |  
|Non-controlling interests in variable interest entities (Notes 21 and 22)                                                                            |  |               | 3,977,000    |   |      |   | 4,432,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |              
|Commitments and contingencies (Note 2)                                                                                                               |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |              
|Stockholders deficit:                                                                                                                               |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Preferred stock, $.01 par, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding                                                            |  |               |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Common stock, $.01 par, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 97,549,783 and 96,485,477
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively |  |               | 975,000      |   |      |   | 965,000      |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                           |  |               | 74,483,000   |   |      |   | 73,993,000   |  
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                  |  |               | (131,922,000 | ) |      |   | (117,268,000 | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|Total stockholders deficit                                                                                                                          |  |               | (56,464,000  | ) |      |   | (42,310,000  | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | $             | 4,073,000    |   |      | $ | 5,063,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |               |              |   |      |   |              |  

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-2



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                                      |  | For the Years Ended September 30, |            
|                                                                                                                      |  | 2009                              |             |   | 2008 |  
|Revenue:                                                                                                              |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Products                                                                                                              |  | $                                 | 2,175,000   |   |      | $ | 3,310,000   |  
|Services                                                                                                              |  |                                   | 1,481,000   |   |      |   | 1,965,000   |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Total revenue                                                                                                         |  |                                   | 3,656,000   |   |      |   | 5,275,000   |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Operating costs and expenses:                                                                                         |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Cost of revenue:                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Products                                                                                                              |  |                                   | 1,456,000   |   |      |   | 1,832,000   |  
|Services                                                                                                              |  |                                   | 996,000     |   |      |   | 1,132,000   |  
|Research and development expense                                                                                      |  |                                   | 1,060,000   |   |      |   | 3,514,000   |  
|General and administrative expense                                                                                    |  |                                   | 2,915,000   |   |      |   | 5,569,000   |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Total operating costs and expenses                                                                                    |  |                                   | 6,427,000   |   |      |   | 12,047,000  |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Loss from operations                                                                                                  |  |                                   | (2,771,000  | ) |      |   | (6,772,000  | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Other income (expense):                                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Interest expense, net                                                                                                 |  |                                   | (6,915,000  | ) |      |   | (7,878,000  |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt (Notes 10 and 12)                                                                      |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | (6,601,000  | )
|Loss on derivative liabilities                                                                                        |  |                                   | (1,040,000  | ) |      |   | (272,000    | )
|Other income (expense), net                                                                                           |  |                                   | (138,000    | ) |      |   | 387,000     |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   | (8,093,000  | ) |      |   | (14,364,000 | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Loss before reorganization items, non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities and income
taxes |  |                                   | (10,864,000 | ) |      |   | (21,136,000 | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                  
|Reorganization items:                                                                                                 |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Gain on settlement of rejected lease                                                                                  |  |                                   | 30,000      |   |      |   |            |  
|Professional Fees                                                                                                     |  |                                   | (380,000    | ) |      |   |            |  
|Provision for indemnity agreements                                                                                    |  |                                   | (3,895,000  | ) |      |   |            |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   | (4,245,000  | ) |      |   |            |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Loss before reorganization items, non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities and income
taxes |  |                                   | (15,109,000 | ) |      |   | (21,136,000 | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                  
|Non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities                                                    |  |                                   | 455,000     |   |      |   | 496,000     |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net loss before income taxes                                                                                          |  |                                   | (14,654,000 | ) |      |   | (20,640,000 |  
|Income tax expense                                                                                                    |  |                                   |            |   |      |   |            |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                                                              |  | $                                 | (14,654,000 | ) |      | $ | (20,640,000 | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Loss per common share:                                                                                                |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Basic and diluted                                                                                                     |  | $                                 | (0.15       | ) |      | $ | (0. 21      | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Weighted average shares outstanding:                                                                                  |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Basic and diluted                                                                                                     |  |                                   | 97,502,888  |   |      |   | 96,068,487  |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-3



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND 2008



|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------ | ------- | ------------------ | - | ---------- | ----- | - | ------------ | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                          |  | Common Stock |  | AdditionalPaid-inCapital |         | AccumulatedDeficit |   |            | Total |  
|                                                          |  | Shares       |  | Amount                   |         |                    |  
|Balances at October 1, 2007                               |  | 95,638,820   |  | $                        | 956,000 |                    | $ | 62,497,000 |       | $ | (96,628,000  | ) |  | $ | (33,175,000 | )
|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  
|Warrants issued with financing transactions               |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 539,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 539,000     |  
|Stock issued for payment of accrued expenses              |  | 332,218      |  |                          | 3,000   |                    |   | 157,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 160,000     |  
|Stock issued for modification of debt                     |  | 450,000      |  |                          | 5,000   |                    |   | 453,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 458,000     |  
|Employee share-based compensation                         |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 1,173,000  |       |   |             |   |  |   | 1,173,000   |  
|Director share-based compensation                         |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 305,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 305,000     |  
|Warrants issued to guarantors in financing transactions   |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 3,037,000  |       |   |             |   |  |   | 3,037,000   |  
|Warrants issued for modification of debt                  |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 156,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 156,000     |  
|Gain on related-party contract modification               |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 4,854,000  |       |   |             |   |  |   | 4,854,000   |  
|Stock issued in payment of interest on outstanding debt   |  | 64,439       |  |                          | 1,000   |                    |   | 24,000     |       |   |             |   |  |   | 25,000      |  
|Beneficial conversion option issued with convertible debt |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 408,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 408,000     |  
|Additional investment rights issued with convertible debt |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 390,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 390,000     |  
|Net loss                                                  |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   |           |       |   | (20,640,000  | ) |  |   | (20,640,000 | )
|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  
|Balances at September 30, 2008                            |  | 96,485,477   |  | $                        | 965,000 |                    | $ | 73,993,000 |       | $ | (117,268,000 | ) |  | $ | (42,310,000 | )
|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  
|Stock issued for payment of interest on debt              |  | 964,306      |  |                          | 9,000   |                    |   | 233,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 242,000     |  
|Stock issued for modification of debt                     |  | 100,000      |  |                          | 1,000   |                    |   | 31,000     |       |   |             |   |  |   | 32,000      |  
|Warrants issued for modification of debt                  |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 62,000     |       |   |             |   |  |   | 62,000      |  
|Employee share-based compensation                         |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   | 164,000    |       |   |             |   |  |   | 164,000     |  
|Net loss                                                  |  |             |  |                          |        |                    |   |           |       |   | (14,654,000  | ) |  |   | (14,654,000 | )
|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  
|Balances at September 30, 2009                            |  | 97,549,783   |  | $                        | 975,000 |                    | $ | 74,483,000 |       | $ | (131,922,000 | ) |  | $ | (56,464,000 | )
|                                                          |  |              |  |                          |         |                    |   |            |       |   |              |   |  |   |             |  

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-4



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                               |  | For the Years ended September 30, |            
|                                                                               |  | 2009                              |             |   | 2008 |  
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                          |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                       |  | $                                 | (14,654,000 | ) |      | $ | (20,640,000 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities: |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Depreciation                                                                   |  |                                   | 145,000     |   |      |   | 543,000     |  
|Amortization                                                                   |  |                                   | 23,000      |   |      |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock, options and warrants for services                    |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 95,000      |  
|Employee share-based compensation                                              |  |                                   | 164,000     |   |      |   | 1,478,000   |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt                                                 |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 6,601,000   |  
|Amortization of discounts on notes payable                                     |  |                                   | 1,472,000   |   |      |   | 1,150,000   |  
|Amortization of deferred loan costs                                            |  |                                   | 36,000      |   |      |   | 415,000     |  
|Charge for warrants issued for guarantees of debt                              |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 3,037,000   |  
|Loss on disposal of property and equipment                                     |  |                                   | 335,000     |   |      |   | 156,000     |  
|Non-controlling interest in loss of variable interest entities                 |  |                                   | (455,000    | ) |      |   | (496,000    | )
|Gain on settlement of accrued expenses                                         |  |                                   | (63,000     | ) |      |   | (439,000    | )
|Loss on derivative liabilities                                                 |  |                                   | 1,040,000   |   |      |   | 272,000     |  
|Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:                         |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Accounts receivable                                                            |  |                                   | 75,000      |   |      |   | 59,000      |  
|Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billing on uncompleted contracts     |  |                                   | (148,000    | ) |      |   | (46,000     | )
|Inventories                                                                    |  |                                   | 100,000     |   |      |   | 123,000     |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                      |  |                                   | 61,000      |   |      |   | 49,000      |  
|Other assets                                                                   |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 389,000     |  
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                       |  |                                   | 5,864,000   |   |      |   | (464,000    | )
|Customer deposits                                                              |  |                                   | 29,000      |   |      |   | (507,000    | )
|Billing in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts     |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | (75,000     | )
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net cash flows from operating activities before reorganization items           |  |                                   | (5,976,000  | ) |      |   | (8,300,000  | )
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Reorganization items:                                                          |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Cash paid for settlement of administrative claim                               |  |                                   | 14,000      |   |      |   |            |  
|Gain on settlement of rejected lease                                           |  |                                   | (44,000     | ) |      |   |            |  
|Provision for indemnity agreements                                             |  |                                   | 3,895,000   |   |      |   |            |  
|Increase in accrued professional fees                                          |  |                                   | 182,000     |   |      |   |            |  
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net change in cash flows from reorganization items                             |  |                                   | 4,047,000   |   |      |   |            |  
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net cash flows from operating activities                                       |  |                                   | (1,929,000  | ) |      |   | (8,300,000  | )
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                          |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Purchase of property and equipment                                             |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | (46,000     | )
|Proceeds from sale of property and equipment                                   |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 69,000      |  
|Deposit of restricted cash                                                     |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | (3,344,000  | )
|Release of restricted cash                                                     |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 3,344,000   |  
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net cash flows from investing activities                                       |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 23,000      |  
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                          |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Repayment of notes payable and long-term debt                                  |  |                                   | (89,000     | ) |      |   | (4,218,000  | )
|Advances from related party                                                    |  |                                   | 1,770,000   |   |      |   | 3,641,000   |  
|Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt                                 |  |                                   |            |   |      |   | 9,695,000   |  
|Payment of deferred financing costs                                            |  |                                   | (65,000     | ) |      |   | (426,000    | )
|                                                                               |  |                                   |             |   |      |   |             |  



F-5



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Continued



|                                                          |  |                                   |           |   |      |   |          
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | --------- | - | ---- | - | ---------
|                                                          |  | For the Years ended September 30,
|                                                          |  | 2009                              |           |   | 2008
|Net cash flows from financing activities                  |  |                                   | 1,616,000 |   |      |   | 8,692,000
|                                                          |  |                                   |           |   |      |   |          
|Net change in cash                                        |  |                                   | (313,000  | ) |      |   | 415,000  
|Cash at beginning of period                               |  |                                   | 539,000   |   |      |   | 124,000  
|Cash at end of period                                     |  | $                                 | 226,000   |   |      | $ | 539,000  
|                                                          |  |                                   |           |   |      |   |          
|Supplemental cash flow information                        |  |                                   |           |   |      |   |          
|Non-cash financing and investing transactions:            |  |                                   |           |   |      |   |          
|Stock issued for payment of accrued expenses and interest |  | $                                 | 240,000   |   |      | $ | 160,000  
|Stock issued for modification of debt                     |  |                                   | 25,000    |   |      |   | 458,000  
|Issuance of warrants                                      |  |                                   | 62,000    |   |      |   | 1,577,000
|Cash paid for interest during the year                    |  | $                                 | 163,000   |   |      | $ | 1,860,000

The accompanying
footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-6



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008

1. Nature of business

As a result of Biovest International, Inc.s (the Company or Biovest) collaboration with the National Cancer
Institute (NCI), Biovest is developing BiovaxID® as a personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine for the treatment
of non-Hodgkins lymphoma, specifically follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and potentially other B-cell blood cancers. Both FL and MCL are generally considered to be incurable with currently approved therapies. These
generally fatal diseases arise from the lymphoid tissue and are characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation and spread throughout the body of mature B-cells, which are a type of white blood cell.

Three clinical trials conducted under Biovests Investigational New Drug Application (IND) have studied BiovaxID in non-Hodgkins lymphoma.
These studies include a Phase 2 clinical trial and a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with FL, as well as, a Phase 2 clinical trial in MCL patients. The Company believes that these clinical trials have demonstrated that BiovaxID, which is
personalized and autologous (derived from a patients own tumor cells), has an excellent safety profile and is effective in the treatment of these lethal diseases. Biovest is currently preparing for discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and international agencies regarding regulatory approvals of BiovaxID for FL and MCL based on these clinical trials. Biovest expects BiovaxID may also have applications in other forms of B-cell lymphomas.

To support Biovests planned commercialization of BiovaxID, Biovest developed an automated cell culture instrument called AutovaxID. The
Company believes that AutovaxID has significant potential application in the production of a broad range of patient-specific medicines, such as BiovaxID as well as other monoclonal antibodies. Biovest is under contract with the U.S. Department of
Defense to further develop the AutovaxID and to explore potential production of additional vaccines including vaccines for viral indications such as influenza. AutovaxID is automated and computer controlled to improve cell production reliability and
to maximize cell production. AutovaxID uses a disposable production unit which minimizes the need for FDA required clean rooms in the production process and provides for robust and dependable manufacturing while complying with the
industry cGMP standards. AutovaxID has a small footprint and supports scalable production.

Biovest also manufactures instruments and
disposables used in the hollow fiber production of cell culture products. The Companys hollow fiber cell culture products and instruments are used by biopharmaceutical and biotech companies, medical schools, universities, research facilities,
hospitals and public and private laboratories. Biovest also produces mammalian and insect cells, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant and secreted proteins and other cell culture products using our unique capability, expertise and proprietary
advancements in the cell production process known as hollow fiber perfusion.

Biovests business consists of three primary business
segments: development of BiovaxID and potentially other B-cell blood cancer vaccines; the manufacture and sale of AutovaxID and other instruments and consumables; and commercial production of cell culture products and services.

As of September 30, 2009, the Company is a 75% owned subsidiary of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Accentia).



F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



2. Chapter 11 bankruptcy:

On November 10, 2008, Biovest, along with its subsidiaries, Biovax, Inc., AutovaxID, Inc., Biolender LLC and Biolender II LLC
(collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the
Bankruptcy Court). During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Debtors will operate its business as a debtor-in-possession in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court. With existing cash flow and the potential for relatively near-term significant business development opportunities for
BiovaxID® and AutovaxID, the Chapter 11 proceedings are intended to provide an opportunity for the Company
to restore shareholder value and to pay all secured and unsecured creditors. Under protection of the Bankruptcy Court, Biovest plans to implement a series of initiatives designed to significantly decrease operating expenses and financing costs, and
focus cash and resources on its priority programs that will allow the Company to attract key funding/partnering opportunities. The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a
going concern once it emerges from Chapter 11. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, its ability to successfully restructure its indebtedness and to emerge from bankruptcy with a viable plan
for reorganization and with adequate liquidity. The Company believes the Chapter 11 reorganization will achieve these objectives but the Company can provide no assurances. During this reorganization process, Biovest expects to continue operations
without interruption, while striving to maximize long-term shareholder value.

Under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to
collect most of the Debtors prepetition liabilities, including payments owing to vendors in respect of goods furnished and services provided prior to the petition date, are automatically stayed and other contractual obligations of the Debtors
generally may not be enforced. Shortly after the petition date, the Debtors began notifying all known actual or potential creditors of the Debtors for the purpose of identifying all prepetition claims against the Debtors. The Chapter 11
proceedings triggered defaults on substantially all debt obligations of the Debtors. The stay provisions of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, however, also apply to actions to collect prepetition indebtedness or to exercise control over the
property of the Debtors estate in respect of such defaults. The rights of and ultimate payments by the Debtors under prepetition obligations will be addressed in any plan of reorganization and may be substantially altered. This could result in
unsecured claims being compromised at less, and possibly substantially less, than 100% of their face value. For additional information, refer to Note 15, Liabilities Subject to Compromise.

3. Significant accounting policies

Principles of Consolidation:

The
consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of wholly-owned companies and interests in variable interest entities where the Company has a controlling financial interest or has been determined to be the primary beneficiary under
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810  Consolidation.

The 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial
statements include Biovest International, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries Biovax, Inc., AutovaxID, Inc., Biolender LLC and Biolender II LLC; and certain variable interest entities of the Company, Biovax Investment LLC, Telesis CDE Two LLC,
AutovaxID Investment LLC, and St. Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II LLC (Notes 21 and 22). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.



F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



3. Significant accounting policies (contd)

Voluntary Petition in Bankruptcy:

On
November 10, 2008, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Debtors will operate its business as a debtor-in-possession in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court.

ASC Topic 852 -
Reorganizations, which is applicable to companies in Chapter 11, generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, it does require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the filing
of the Chapter 11 petition distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that can
be directly associated with the reorganization and restructuring of the business must be reported separately as reorganization items in the statements of operations beginning in the quarter ending December 31, 2008. The balance sheet must
distinguish prepetition liabilities subject to compromise from both those prepetition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at
the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, cash provided by reorganization items must be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. Biovest became subject to ASC
Topic 852 effective on November 10, 2008 and will segregate those items as outlined above for all reporting periods subsequent to such date.

Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Inventories:

Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Property and equipment:

Property and
equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation for property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives
or the lease term.

Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocated to identifiable assets:

Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocated to identifiable assets relates to our cell culture and instrument manufacturing segments located in
Minneapolis, MN, which continue to be profitable segments of the Company. Reorganization value is tested for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indication. The Company has not recorded any impairment losses as a result of these
evaluations.

Patents and trademarks:

Costs incurred in relation to patent applications are capitalized as deferred patent costs. If and when a patent is issued, the related patent application
costs are transferred to the patent account and amortized over the estimated useful life of the patent. If it is determined that a patent will not be issued, the related patent application costs are charged to expense at the time such determination
is made. Patent and trademark costs are recorded at historical cost. Patent and trademark costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of six years for patents and twenty years for trademarks.

Deferred Financing Costs:

Deferred financing costs include fees paid in cash in conjunction with obtaining notes payable and long-term debt and are amortized over the term of the
related financial instrument.

Carrying value of long-lived assets:

The carrying values of the Companys long-lived assets are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
might not be recoverable. This assessment may be based upon managements experience in the industry, historical and projected sales, current backlog, and expectations of undiscounted future cash flows. The Company reviews the valuation and
amortization of those long-lived assets to determine possible impairment by comparing the carrying value to projected undiscounted future cash flows of the related assets. The Company determined no impairment existed as of September 30, 2009.



F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



3. Significant accounting policies (contd)

Financial instruments:

Financial
instruments, as defined in ASC 825  Financial Instruments, consist of cash, evidence of ownership in an entity and contracts that both (i) impose on one entity a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial
instrument to a second entity, or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity, and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right (a) to receive cash or another financial
instrument from the first entity or (b) to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. Accordingly, the Companys financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable,
accrued liabilities, notes payable, long-term debt, royalty liabilities, and derivative financial instruments.

The Company carries cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities at historical costs of which their respective the estimated fair values of these assets and liabilities approximate carrying values due to their current nature. The Company also carries
notes payable and long-term debt at historical cost less discounts from warrants issued as loan financing costs; however, fair values of these debt instruments are estimated for disclosure purposes based upon the present value of the estimated cash
flows at market interest rates applicable to similar instruments.

Derivative instruments:

The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have entered into certain other financial instruments and contracts, such as debt financing arrangements and freestanding warrants with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification,
(ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. These instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value.

The Company estimates fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be
consistent with the objective measuring of fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique(s), management considers, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. For
less complex derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, estimated terms
and risk free rates) necessary to fair value these instruments. For forward contracts that contingently require net-cash settlement as the principal means of settlement, management projects and discounts future cash flows applying
probability-weightage to multiple possible outcomes. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument
with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the Companys trading market price and the trading market price of various peer companies, which
have historically had high volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair value, the Companys income will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

The Company reports its derivative liabilities at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008.

Revenue recognition:

Instruments and disposables sales are recognized in the period in which the applicable products are delivered. The Company does not provide its customers
with a right of return; however, deposits made by customers must be returned to customers in the event of non-performance by the Company and, as such, are not recognized as sales until product delivery.

Revenues from contract cell production services are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of contract costs
incurred to date to the estimated total contract costs for each contract. Contract costs include all direct material, subcontract and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, insurance, supplies
and tools. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in
revisions to revenues, costs and profits and are recognized in the period such revisions are determined. Because of the inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change in the near
term. The asset costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. Such revenues are expected to be billed and collected within one year on uncompleted
contracts. The liability billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts represents billings in excess of revenue recognized.



F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



3. Significant accounting policies (contd)

Research and development expenses:

The
Company expenses research and development expenditures as incurred. Such costs include payroll and related costs, facility costs, consulting and professional fees, equipment rental and maintenance, lab supplies, and certain other indirect cost
allocations that are directly related to research and development activities. In the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 the Company incurred total research and development expenses of approximately $1.1 million, and $3.5 million,
respectively.

Shipping and handling costs:

Shipping and handling costs are included as a component of cost of revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based compensation:

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company has adopted the accounting provisions of ASC Topic 718  Stock Compensation, which requires
the use of the fair-value based method to determine compensation for all arrangements under which employees and others receive shares of stock or equity instruments (warrants and options). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model that uses assumptions for expected volatility, expected dividends, expected term, and the risk-free interest rate. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of peer companies and other
factors estimated over the expected term of the options. The expected term of options granted is derived using the simplified method which computes expected term as the average of the sum of the vesting term plus the contract term. The
risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the period of the expected term.

Loss
per common share:

Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

The Company had net losses for all periods presented in which potential common shares were in existence. Diluted loss per share assumes conversion of all
potentially dilutive outstanding common stock options, warrants, or other convertible financial instruments. Potential common shares outstanding are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. As such,
dilutive loss per share is the same as basic loss per share for all periods presented as the effect of all potential common shares outstanding is anti-dilutive.

The common stock equivalents and common shares indexed to convertible debt securities that are not considered in the calculation of diluted loss per
share because the effect would be anti-dilutive are as follows:



|                                              |  |                           |  |           
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------
|                                              |  | Years ended September 30,
|                                              |  | 2009                      |  | 2008      
|Options and Warrants to purchase common stock |  | 45,011,712                |  | 40,692,201
|Convertible Debt Instruments                  |  | 47,268,348                |  | 42,396,315
|Contractually obligated stock issuance        |  |                          |  | 937,500   
|                                              |  |                           |  |           
|                                              |  | 92,280,060                |  | 84,026,016
|                                              |  |                           |  |           



F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



3. Significant accounting policies (contd)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In
December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for business combinations which includes the fundamental principle of recording the acquired business at fair value as well as requiring acquisition-related costs to be recognized separately
from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. In addition, this new pronouncement requires extensive disclosures about the acquisitions quantitative and qualitative effects including validation of the fair value of goodwill. This new guidance
is effective for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will apply this pronouncement to any
of its business combinations occurring after October 1, 2009. Earlier adoption is prohibited. This pronouncement did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements, but may have an effect on accounting for future business
combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance requiring non-controlling interests to be treated as a separate component of
equity, not as a liability or other item outside of permanent equity. This new guidance is applicable to the accounting for non-controlling interests and transactions with non-controlling interest holders in consolidated financial statements and is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this new pronouncement as of October 1, 2009. The adoption will result in a decrease of $16.3 million to the opening balance of
stockholders equity on the Companys fiscal year 2010 consolidated statement of financial condition; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on its results of operations or cash
flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance regarding disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. This new
guidance required expanded disclosures regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities to include how and why an entity is using a derivative instrument or hedging activity, an explanation of its accounting for such instruments, and how the
instrument affects the entitys financial position and performance as well as cash flows. This new pronouncement also clarifies that derivative instruments are subject to concentration-of-credit-risk disclosures. The Company has adopted this
new pronouncement during fiscal year 2009. See Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the application of this pronouncement.

In May 2008, the FASB issued new guidance requiring issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon
conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted and retroactive application to all periods presented is required. Currently, the
convertible debt the Company has issued does not fall within the scope of the new pronouncement and thus the Company does not expect its adoption will have any impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued new guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entities
own stock. The Company adopted this new guidance effective October 1, 2009. Certain of the Companys outstanding warrants and convertible debt contain features which fall under the scope of this guidance resulting in a decrease of $7.0
million and $9.3 million to the October 1, 2009 balances of additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit respectively.

In May
2009, the FASB issued new guidance to be used in the evaluation of trends and transactions that may occur and result in recognition or disclosure in the financial statements after the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements are
issued. Provisions within this new guidance address the circumstances under which such events or transactions which occur subsequent to the reporting period-end must be recognized in the financial statements. The Company has adopted this new
guidance during fiscal year 2009 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB
issued new guidance amending the existing pronouncement related to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This new guidance requires the reporting entities to evaluate former qualified special purpose entities for consolidation,
changes the approach to determine a variable interest entitys primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment designed to identify a controlling financial interest, and increases the frequency of required
assessments to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of any variable interest entities which the



F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



Company is a party to. This new guidance is not effective for us until October 1, 2010 and earlier
adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, or ASU 2009-13, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable
arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in fiscal
years on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements, if any.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17, or ASU 2010-17, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and
determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development arrangements that contain payment provisions contingent upon achieving specified events. ASU 2010-17 is effective for milestones
achieved in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements, if any.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-02 Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiarya Scope
Clarification (2010-02) an update of ASC 810 Consolidation. 2010-02 clarifies the scope of ASC 810 with respect to decreases in ownership in a subsidiary to those of a: subsidiary or group of assets that are a
business or nonprofit, a subsidiary that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity to a non-controlling interest including an equity method
investee or a joint venture. Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and DisclosuresImproving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements (2010-06). 2010-06 requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and disclosures regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, on a gross
basis, for Level 3 fair value measurements. 2010-06 also calls for further disaggregation of all assets and liabilities based on line items shown in the statement of financial position. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, which updates the guidance in ASC 855,Subsequent Events, such that companies that
file with the SEC will no longer be required to indicate the date through which they have analyzed subsequent events. This updated guidance became effective immediately upon issuance and was adopted as of the first quarter of 2010.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded
Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11). ASU 2010-11 clarifies the only form of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements is one that is related only to the subordination of one
financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in this ASU are effective at the beginning of a reporting entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after
March 5, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-11 is not expected to have an impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



4. Liquidity and managements plans

During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred a net loss of $14.7 million. At September 30, 2009, the Company had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $132 million and working capital deficit of approximately $55.2 million which includes liabilities subject to compromise through the Companys Chapter 11 proceedings. The Company filed a voluntary
petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida on November 10, 2008. The Company will continue to operate as
debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. The Companys independent auditors issued a going
concern uncertainty on the financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2009, citing significant losses and working capital deficits at that date, which raised substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a
going concern.

Regulatory strategy and commercialization expenditures:

The Company has completed its Phase 3 clinical trial of BiovaxID for the indication of FL. Under the Companys current regulatory
strategy, the Company is performing in-depth analyses of the available clinical trial data in preparation for submission of the data to the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA).
Based upon a recommendation from the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) which monitors the safety and efficacy profile of the clinical trial and the Companys analysis of the available clinical trial data, the Company plans
to seek accelerated and conditional approval of BiovaxID® with FDA, EMEA, and other international agencies, for
the indication of FL. Pending the outcome of these anticipated applications for accelerated and conditional approval, the Company has ceased enrolling new patients in its Phase 3 clinical trial and has discontinued most clinical trial activities
which had the effect of decreasing clinical trial expenses compared to those recorded for prior periods. Accelerated or conditional approval would require the Company to perform additional clinical studies as a condition to continued marketing of
BiovaxID. Accordingly, should the Company receive accelerated and/or conditional approval, clinical trial activities and related expenses may return to the levels experienced in periods prior to the application for conditional approval until any
such clinical trial activity is completed. There can be no assurances the Company will receive accelerated or conditional approval. The Companys ability to timely access required financing will continue to be essential to support the
ongoing commercialization efforts. The Companys inability to obtain required funds or any substantial delay in obtaining required funds will have a material adverse effect on the ongoing commercialization efforts.

Issuance of common shares:

In October
2008, the Company issued 1,064,306 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of interest and fees due on its outstanding debt.

Advances
to the Company by Accentia:

During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company borrowed an additional $0.8 million to increase the
total balance due to Accentia to approximately $12.6 million. The advances by Accentia as of September 30, 2009 consisted of cash loans, payments directly to third parties on the Companys behalf, allocated inter-company expenses, accrued
interest of $2.0 million, and amounts owed in connection with the conversion of notes outstanding at the time of Accentias initial investment in June 2003. The balance of the inter-company loans is evidenced by three secured promissory
demand notes which accrue interest at the prime rate and are due on demand. On February 5, 2008, the terms of these notes were modified to allow Accentia the option (the Conversion Option) to convert part or all of the principal and
interest due into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $1.10 per share (the Conversion Price) subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations or in the event that the Company offer its stock
at prices below the Conversion Price. In September 2008, as provided for under the adjustment provisions of the Conversion Option, the conversion price was modified to allow Accentia to convert part or all of the principal and interest due into
shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $0.32 per share. The Company granted piggyback and demand registration rights to Accentia for the shares underlying this Conversion Option. As a result of the Companys filing
of Chapter 11 on November 10, 2008, collection of pre-petition amounts due under these notes (approximately $12.3 million) has been stayed and the Conversion Option may not be enforced.



F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



4. Liquidity and managements plans (contd)

15% Secured Convertible Debenture

On
September 22, 2008, the Company entered into definitive agreements with three investors, all of whom are affiliates, related to a private placement of its 15% Secured Convertible Debentures (the Debentures). The definitive documents
permit the Company to place up to $5.0 million in principal amount of its Debentures (the Private Placement). The Company has sold $1.150 million in principal amount of its Debentures to three investors (the Initial Tranche).

The Debentures are convertible into the Companys common stock at $0.32 per share (the Conversion Price) and, provided
certain conditions are satisfied, the Company may, at its option, redeem the Debentures for an amount equal to 110% of the then outstanding principal. Each purchaser of Debentures in the Private Placement has the right to elect to be repaid in one
of the following methods: a) Commencing six months after closing, the Debentures will be amortized through twelve equal monthly payments; or b) A single lump-sum payment of all remaining outstanding principal and accrued interest shall be made on
March 31, 2010. All principal amortization payments and monthly interest payments will be made in cash or the Company may elect to make the payments in shares of its common stock. The Companys ability to pay interest with shares of
Company common stock will be subject to specified conditions, including the existence of an effective registration statement covering the resale of the shares issued in payment of redemption amount unless the shares may be resold pursuant to Rule
144 without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions or current public information requirements. Any common stock delivered in satisfaction of an amortization payment will be valued at the lesser of (i) the conversion price in effect at the time
of the amortization payment or (ii) 90% of the average of the daily volume weighted average price of the shares for the 20 trading days prior to the amortization payment date. The Company has the ability to make payment of interest with
shares of the Companys common stock if the conditions stated herein are not met, upon the consent of the holder of the Debenture, and in that event the common stock delivered in satisfaction of an amortization payment will be valued at the
lesser of (i) the conversion price in effect at the time of the amortization payment or (ii) 80% of the average of the daily volume weighted average price of the shares for the 20 trading days prior to the amortization payment date.

As a part of the Initial Tranche of the Private Placement, the Company issued Warrants to the purchasers of the Debentures giving them the
right to purchase 1,796,875 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share (the Exercise Price). The warrant exercise prices are subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, and the like.
Additionally, the Debentures issued in the Initial Tranche permit the holders to convert into 3,593,750 shares of the Companys common stock.

On October 29, 2008, and effective as of October 15, 2008, the Company closed an additional agreement with one additional investor related to a
private placement of its 15% Secured Convertible Debentures. The Company sold $0.3 million in principal amount of its Debentures to the investor.

In the event that the Company issues or grants in the future any rights to purchase any of the Companys common stock, or other securities
convertible into the Companys common stock, for an effective per share price less than the Conversion Price or in the instance of warrants the Exercise Price then in effect, the conversion price of all unconverted Debentures and the Exercise
Price of all unexercised Warrants will be decreased to equal such lower price. The above-described adjustments to the Conversion Price and Exercise Price for future stock issuances by the Company will not apply to certain exempt issuances, including
stock issuances pursuant to employee stock option plans and strategic transactions.

Debtor-in-Possession Financing:

On December 22, 2008, the Company completed the closing of a debtor-in-possession financing transaction (the DIP Transaction) with Corps
Real, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, whos principal owners are directors of the Company (the DIP Lender). Pursuant to the transaction, the DIP Lender provided to the Company a secured line of credit in an amount of up
to $3.0 million in accordance with an order entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (the Court). As of September 30, 2009, the DIP Lender has advanced $1.25 million to the Company.



F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



4. Liquidity and managements plans (contd)

Termination of Leases:

On
December 8, 2008, the Company through its Chapter 11 proceedings rejected its lease in Worcester, Massachusetts.

On December 1,
2008, the Company amended its lease in St. Louis, Missouri, which shortened the lease term to November 30, 2009 and decreased the leased premises to 10,000 square feet. On March 31, 2009, pursuant to the terms of the amended lease, the
Company terminated the lease.

Additional expected financing activity:

Management intends to attempt to meet its cash requirements through proceeds from its cell culture and instrument manufacturing activities, the use of
cash on hand, trade vendor credit, restructuring of our outstanding debt obligations through the Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, short-term borrowings, debt and equity financings, and strategic transactions such as collaborations and
licensing. The Companys ability to continue present operations, pay its liabilities as they become due, and meet its obligations for vaccine development is dependent upon the Companys ability to obtain significant external funding in the
very short term. Additional sources of funding have not been established; however, additional financing is currently being sought by the Company from a number of sources, including the sale of equity or debt securities, strategic collaborations,
recognized research funding programs, as well as domestic and/or foreign licensing of the Companys vaccine. Management is currently in the process of exploring these various financing alternatives. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be successful in securing such financing at acceptable terms, if at all. Accordingly, our ability to continue present operations, pay our existing liabilities as they become due, and continue our ongoing clinical trial is dependent upon our
ability to successfully complete the Chapter 11 reorganization process and to obtain significant external funding from sources other than Accentia in the very near term, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. If adequate funds are not available from the foregoing sources in the near term, or if the Company determines it to otherwise be in the Companys best interest, the Company may consider additional strategic financing options, including
sales of assets, or the Company may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its research or development programs or curtail some or all of its commercialization efforts.

5. Accounts Receivable, concentrations of credit risk and major customers

Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and accounts receivable.

Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms for products sold to distributors and retail customers. The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of customers financial condition, but does not require collateral or any other security to support amounts due. Management reviews accounts receivable on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables will
potentially be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts contains a specific accrual for accounts receivable balances that are considered potential bad debts and a general accrual for remaining possible bad debts. Any accounts receivable
balances that are determined to be uncollectible are written off to the allowance. Based on the information available, management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2009 is adequate. However, actual write-offs
might exceed the recorded allowance.

Two customers accounted for 28% of revenues for fiscal 2009 while one customer accounted for 28% of
revenues for fiscal 2008. Two customers accounted for 71% and 38% of trade accounts receivable as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. A significant amount of the Companys revenue has been derived from export sales. The
Companys export sales were 28%, and 39% of revenues for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 respectively. Sales to customers in the United Kingdom accounted for 17% and 28% of total revenue for the last two fiscal years.



F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



6. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:



|                |  |               |         |      |   |        
|--------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                |  | September 30,
|                |  | 2009          |         | 2008
|Finished goods  |  | $             | 147,000 |      | $ | 172,000
|Work-in-process |  |               | 8,000   |      |   | 67,000 
|Raw materials   |  |               | 354,000 |      |   | 370,000
|                |  |               |         |      |   |        
|                |  | $             | 509,000 |      | $ | 609,000
|                |  |               |         |      |   |        

7. Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts

Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following:



|                                        |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                        |  | September 30, |           
|                                        |  | 2009          |            |   | 2008 |  
|Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts |  | $             | 561,000    |   |      | $ | 583,000    |  
|Estimated earnings                      |  |               | 931,000    |   |      |   | 1,039,000  |  
|                                        |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|                                        |  |               | 1,492,000  |   |      |   | 1,622,000  |  
|Less billings to date                   |  |               | (1,241,000 | ) |      |   | (1,519,000 | )
|                                        |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|                                        |  | $             | 251,000    |   |      | $ | 103,000    |  
|                                        |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  

These amounts are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the following captions:



|                                                                            |  |               |         |      |   |        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                                                                            |  | September 30,
|                                                                            |  | 2009          |         | 2008
|Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |  | $             | 251,000 |      | $ | 103,000
|Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |  |               |        |      |   |       
|                                                                            |  |               |         |      |   |        
|                                                                            |  | $             | 251,000 |      | $ | 103,000
|                                                                            |  |               |         |      |   |        

8. Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:



|                                               |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                               |  | September 30, |           
|                                               |  | 2009          |            |   | 2008 |  
|Furniture and fixtures                         |  | $             | 73,000     |   |      | $ | 73,000     |  
|Leasehold improvements                         |  |               | 70,000     |   |      |   | 813,000    |  
|Machinery and equipment                        |  |               | 1,212,000  |   |      |   | 1,212,000  |  
|                                               |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|                                               |  |               | 1,355,000  |   |      |   | 2,098,000  |  
|Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |  |               | (1,274,000 | ) |      |   | (1,536,000 | )
|                                               |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  
|                                               |  | $             | 81,000     |   |      | $ | 562,000    |  
|                                               |  |               |            |   |      |   |            |  



F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



9. Patents and Trademarks

Patents and trademarks consist of the following:



|                         |  |               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|------------------------ |  | ------------- | -------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | -
|                         |  | September 30, |         
|                         |  | 2009          |          |   | 2008 |  
|Patents                  |  | $             | 12,000   |   |      | $ | 12,000   |  
|Trademarks               |  |               | 579,000  |   |      |   | 579,000  |  
|                         |  |               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|                         |  |               | 591,000  |   |      |   | 591,000  |  
|Accumulated amortization |  |               | (301,000 | ) |      |   | (271,000 | )
|                         |  |               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|                         |  | $             | 290,000  |   |      | $ | 320,000  |  
|                         |  |               |          |   |      |   |          |  

Estimated future amortization of patent and trademark costs is as follows:



|                          |  |   |        
|------------------------- |  | - | -------
|Year ending September 30, |  |  
|2010                      |  | $ | 30,000 
|2011                      |  |   | 30,000 
|2012                      |  |   | 30,000 
|2013                      |  |   | 30,000 
|2014                      |  |   | 30,000 
|thereafter                |  |   | 140,000
|                          |  |   |        
|                          |  | $ | 290,000
|                          |  |   |        

10. Notes payable

As a result of the Chapter 11 filings on November 10, 2008, the notes outstanding listed in the table below as of September 30, 2008 became
prepetition indebtedness under the Debtors plan of reorganization. All the notes listed in the table below remain outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and have been classified as Liabilities subject to compromise in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009. See Note 1 for further details.

Notes payable consist of the
following:



|                                                                                                            |  |                   |   |                   |   |           
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | - | ----------------- | - | ----------
|                                                                                                            |  | September 30,2009 |   | September 30,2008
|Pulaski Bank, $1,000,000 face value, prime rate, note payable                                               |  | $                 |  |                   | $ | 600,000   
|Pulaski Bank, $750,000 face value, prime rate, note payable                                                 |  |                   |  |                   |   | 450,000   
|Southwest Bank, $200,000 face value, prime rate plus 1.0%, note payable                                     |  |                   |  |                   |   | 200,000   
|Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp, $3,600,000 face value, 30% note payable                                       |  |                   |  |                   |   | 4,680,000 
|Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, $4,900,000 face value, 30% note payable                                             |  |                   |  |                   |   | 6,370,000 
|Note Payable, $300,000 face value, plus $300,000 in shares of the Companys common stock due upon maturity* |  |                   |  |                   |   | 624,000   
|Other                                                                                                       |  |                   |  |                   |   | 22,000    
|Accrued interest and fees                                                                                   |  |                   |   |                   |   | 1,412,000 
|                                                                                                            |  |                   |   |                   |   |           
|                                                                                                            |  | $                 |  |                   | $ | 14,358,000
|                                                                                                            |  |                   |   |                   |   |           



F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



10. Notes payable (contd)

*On September 10, 2007, the Company issued a promissory note to a private third-party to the Company in the amount of $0.3 million. The note
initially bore no interest, except in the case of default, at which point interest would begin to accrue at 18.0% per annum. Under the terms of the note all principal was originally due on September 9, 2008. The note is an unsecured
obligation of the Company and is subordinated to the Companys outstanding loans to Laurus and the Valens Funds. Under the terms of the note, the Company issued 947,867 shares of the Companys common stock to the note holder on
October 15, 2008 (representing a fair value of $0.3 million) in addition to the $0.3 million in principal due under the note. The Company used the effective interest method to accrete the fair value of these shares as interest expense
throughout the term of the note.

On September 9, 2008, the note was modified to extend the maturity date to the October 15, 2008.
In consideration for this extension, the note holder was issued warrants to purchase 375,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The warrants expire five years from issue date.



F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



On October 15, 2008 the note holder elected to exchange this note for a secured debenture in the
gross amount of $0.3 million which accrues interest at 15% per annum, payable monthly, in cash, or at the Companys option, in shares of the Companys common stock. The debenture is secured by all assets of the Company and is
subordinate to the notes outstanding to Laurus, the Valens Funds, and the Accentia promissory demand notes discussed in Note 12. Commencing March 31, 2009, monthly amortizing principal payments were to be paid in cash, or at the Companys
election and subject to certain restrictions, in shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price which is the lesser of: a) $0.32 per share or; b) 90% of the volume-weighted average price of the Companys common stock for the 20
trading days prior to payment date. The maturity date of the debenture is March 31, 2010. Any principal outstanding prior to maturity date may be converted, at holders election, into shares of the Companys common stock at a
conversion price of $0.32 per share. The debenture also has an optional redemption feature whereby the Company, subject to certain restrictions, may elect to redeem part or all of outstanding principal for the Companys common stock. The
debenture holder received 468,750 warrants to purchase the Companys common stock at $0.40 per share. The warrants expire five years from issuance. Due to the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, no payments or
conversions were made under this note. All future payment and conversion provisions under this note have been stayed.

Components of the newly
issued secured convertible debenture met the definition of derivative financial instruments and required bifurcation under ASC Topic 815  Derivatives and Hedging. Proceeds from the debenture were allocated to debt and derivative liabilities
based on the relative fair values of the debt and derivatives. The resulting derivative liabilities are further discussed in Note 1. The resulting discount on the debt will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the debentures using the
effective interest method.

Laurus and the Valens Funds:

On December 10, 2007, the Company closed two financing transactions with the Valens Funds, both affiliated with Laurus, the Companys senior
lender) pursuant to which the Valens Funds purchased from the Company two secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $8.5 million and entered into royalty agreements whereby the Valens Funds have been granted 7.0% royalty
interests in the worldwide net commercial sales of the Companys biologic products. Proceeds from the transaction, after designated payments to the Valens Funds and Laurus in payment of outstanding obligations and prepayment of certain
scheduled principal and interest payments, were disbursed into a restricted account and were released for the Companys use based upon an agreed schedule. The net proceeds were used to support the planned interim analysis of the clinical data
from the Phase 3 clinical trial BiovaxID, and for general working capital. Effective as of May 30, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the Valens Funds whereby the Valens Funds agreed to extend the maturity date of the secured
promissory notes from the from their initial maturity date of June 10, 2008 to October 31, 2008. In consideration for the extension, the Company entered into an amendment to the December 2007 Royalty Agreement with Valens Offshore (the
Royalty Amendment) whereby the total royalty percentage due to the Valens Funds was increased from 7.0% to 13.5%.

On
July 31, 2008 the Company again extended the maturity date of all debt outstanding to Laurus and the Valens Funds. This included total debt in the principal amount of $14.6 million consisting of the remaining principal outstanding on: 1) the
$7.8 million note closed in March 2006; 2) the $0.5 million notes closed in October 2007 and; 3) the $8.5 million notes closed in December 2007. Under the terms of the restructuring, maturities of all the notes were extended to July 31, 2009,
and will carry no amortizing payments until maturity. Interest on all principal outstanding was amended to 30% per annum, with 10% payable monthly and 20% accruing and payable at maturity. As a result of this modification, the Company is
required to pay an additional $4.4 million fee on the notes, payable at maturity. Due to the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, payments under this note have been stayed.



F-20



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



10. Notes payable (contd)

Laurus and the Valens Funds (contd):

The Company applied the provisions of ASC Topic 470-50  Debt Modifications and Extinguishments to the modifications of the Laurus and Valens Funds
notes. ASC 470-50 provides that substantial modifications of terms should be treated in the same manner as an extinguishment of debt. A cash-flow test is used to determine if the modification is substantial whereby cash flows prior to the
modification are compared to cash flows subsequent to the modification. The guidance states that if the discounted cash flows under the terms of the new debt instrument are at least ten percent different from the discounted cash flows under the
terms of the original instrument then the new terms represent a substantial modification and an extinguishment of debt has occurred. The Company reached the conclusion that consideration paid for the extension of maturity on the notes constituted a
substantial modification of terms and thus treated a portion of the consideration paid as an extinguishment of debt. The Company incurred a $6.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt as a result of these transactions which is included in other
income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2008.

Pulaski Bank:

On January 16, 2007, the Company closed an amended and restated loan transaction with Pulaski Bank, which amended the Loan Agreement
dated September 5, 2006 pursuant to which Pulaski Bank agreed to loan $1 million to the Company pursuant to an unsecured Promissory Note. The Company also closed on a second loan transaction with Pulaski on March 22, 2007, pursuant to
which Pulaski Bank agreed to loan an additional $0.75 million to the Company pursuant to an unsecured Promissory Note.

Both notes, through a
series of modification agreements have had their maturity dates extended to March 31, 2009. The notes can be prepaid by the Company at any time without penalty, bear interest at the prime rate (5.0% per annum at September 30, 2008) and are
an unsecured obligation of the Company, subordinated to the Companys outstanding loans to Laurus and the Valens Funds. The Company has issued to Pulaski Bank 0.55 million shares of the Companys common stock as well as warrants to
purchase an additional 354,167 shares of the Companys common stock at $1.10 per share in connection with the origination and modifications of these notes. Actions to compel payment under these notes have been stayed as a result of the
Companys Chapter 11 filing. These notes remain outstanding at September 30, 2009.

The notes are guaranteed by entities and
individuals affiliated with the Company or Accentia, the majority stockholder of the Company. The Company issued to the guarantors warrants to purchase an aggregate total of 3,632,913 shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, at an exercise price of $0.32 per share. The Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each guarantor should their guarantees be called by Pulaski Bank. In the event of default, resulting in a payment to Pulaski Bank by the
guarantors, the Company has agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by issuance of that number of shares of the Companys restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50 to the modifications of both Pulaski notes using the same procedures as described above under the Laurus
and Valens modifications. The Company incurred a $384,000 loss on extinguishment of debt as a result of the Pulaski modifications which is included in other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
September 30, 2008.

Southwest Bank:

On June 26, 2007, the Company closed a loan transaction with Southwest Bank. Southwest Bank loaned $0.2 million to the Company pursuant to an
unsecured Promissory Note which matured on December 26, 2008. The note bears interest at the prime rate plus 1.0%, requiring monthly payments of interest only. The note is an unsecured obligation of the Company and is subordinated to the
Companys outstanding loans to Laurus and the Valens Funds. The note is guaranteed by an officer of Accentia, the majority stockholder of the Company. The Company has entered into an Indemnification Agreement with the guarantor whereby the
Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the guarantor should the guarantee be called by the Lender. Actions to compel payment under this note have been stayed as a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing. These notes remain
outstanding and have been reported in liabilities subject to compromise in the Companys balance sheet at September 30, 2009.



F-21



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



10. Notes payable (contd)

Southwest Bank (contd):

In
conjunction with the issuance of this note payable the Company issued to the guarantor warrants to purchase 109,090 shares of the Companys Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at an exercise price of $0.32 per share (the
Warrants). The Warrants will expire on June 25, 2012. The Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each guarantor should their guarantees be called by Southwest Bank. In the event of default, resulting in a payment to
Southwest Bank by the guarantors, the Company has agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by issuance of that number of shares of the Companys restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10.

11. Long-term debt

As a
result of the Chapter 11 filings on November 10, 2008, the long term debt outstanding listed in the table below as of September 30, 2008 became prepetition indebtedness under the Debtors plan of reorganization. Accordingly, these
obligations have been classified as Liabilities subject to compromise in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009. See Note 1 for further details.

Long-term debt consists of the following:



|                                                                                            |  |               |   |      |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                            |  | September 30, |  
|                                                                                            |  | 2009          |   | 2008 |  
|Laurus Master Fund, $7,799,000 face value, 30% interest non-amortizing note payable         |  | $             |  |      | $ | 6,768,000  |  
|Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp, $255,000 face value, 30% interest non-amortizing note payable |  |               |  |      |   | 291,000    |  
|Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, $245,000 face value, 30% interest non-amortizing note payable       |  |               |  |      |   | 280,000    |  
|Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, $650,000 face value, 15% secured convertible debenture              |  |               |  |      |   | 62,000     |  
|Notes payable, interest at 10%; convertible into common stock at $1.00 per share            |  |               |  |      |   | 35,000     |  
|Other                                                                                       |  |               |  |      |   | 87,000     |  
|Accrued interest and fees                                                                   |  |               |   |      |   | 2,162,000  |  
|                                                                                            |  |               |   |      |   |            |  
|                                                                                            |  |               |  |      |   | 9,685,000  |  
|Less: current maturities                                                                    |  |               |  |      |   | (9,623,000 | )
|                                                                                            |  |               |   |      |   |            |  
|                                                                                            |  | $             |  |      | $ | 62,000     |  
|                                                                                            |  |               |   |      |   |            |  



F-22



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



Amendments to Laurus Loan:

Pursuant to the original terms of the $7.799 million secured promissory note issued to Laurus, the Company was required to make certain principal and
interest payments commencing in calendar 2007. The Company did not commence making such payments when originally due and reached an understanding that such payments would not commence while the Company sought additional financing. This understanding
was formalized in three letter agreements dated March 19, 2007, October 31, 2007, and July 31, 2008. In addition to formalizing and continuing Laurus forbearance, the Letter Agreements rescheduled future payments due from the
Company to Laurus under the Note. As consideration for the forbearance the Company granted to Laurus a non-cancelable royalty equal to three percent of world-wide net sales of AutovaxID instruments for a period of five years commencing on
May 31, 2007, as well as a cash payment of $3.458 million due July 31, 2009. Additionally, the interest rate on the notes was increased from an initial rate of prime plus 2.0% to 30% per annum (10% payable monthly and the remaining
20% payable at maturity). Under the terms of the royalty agreement the Companys royalty payments to Laurus are required to aggregate to a minimum of $8.0 million with $0.5 million of the minimum royalty having been paid on December 31,
2007 and the balance (if any), less actual royalties paid, being due at the end of the five year royalty term (Note 13). In addition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions of the Letter Agreements, Laurus consented to the Company seeking and, if
available, entering into bridge loans in an aggregate amount of up to $7.0 million. As a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, payment provisions under this note as well as the royalty agreement have been stayed.



F-23



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



11. Long-term debt (contd)

Amendments to Laurus Loan (contd):

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50 to the amendments. The guidance provides that substantial modifications of terms should be treated in the
same manner as an extinguishment of debt and thus accounted for under the provisions of SFAS 125. The Company reached the conclusion that the modification of terms of the $7.799 million loan from Laurus in addition to the $8.0 million minimum
royalty payment due to Laurus under the amendments constitutes a substantial modification of terms and thus treated the amendments as an extinguishment of debt. The Company incurred a $2.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (included in other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations) and a $9.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended September 30, 2007 as a result of these modifications.

On October 30, 2007, the Company completed a financing transaction with Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. and Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC
(collectively the Valens Funds), both of which are affiliated companies of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. Pursuant to this transaction, the Valens Funds purchased from the Company two secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount
of $500,000 and entered into two royalty agreements whereby the Valens Funds have been granted 2% royalty interests in the worldwide net sales and license revenues from commercial sales of the Companys biologic products. The original notes
were non-amortizing, accrued interest at prime plus 2% (with a 9% minimum) and were payable in a single payment of principal and accrued interest on March 31, 2009. On July 31, 2008 the Company modified the terms of these notes, extending
the maturity date to July 31, 2009. Interest on all principal outstanding was amended to 30% per annum, with 10% payable monthly and 20% payable at maturity. As a result of this modification, the Company is required to pay an additional
$0.2 million fee on the notes, payable at maturity. As a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, payment provisions under these notes as well as the royalty agreement have been stayed.

15% Secured Convertible Debenture

On
September 22, 2008, the Company issued to Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC a secured convertible debenture in the principal amount of $0.65 million. The debentures accrue interest at 15% per annum, payable monthly, in cash, or at the Companys
option, in shares of the Companys common stock. The debentures are secured by all assets of the Company and are subordinate to the notes outstanding to Laurus and the Valens Funds. Commencing March 31, 2009, monthly amortizing principal
payments were due in cash, or at the Companys election and subject to certain restrictions, in shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price which is the lesser of: a) $0.32 per share or; b) 90% of the volume-weighted average
price of the Companys common stock for the 20 trading days prior to payment date. The maturity date of the debentures is March 31, 2010. Any principal outstanding prior to maturity date may be converted, at holders election, into
shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $0.32 per share. The debentures also have an optional redemption feature whereby the Company, subject to certain restrictions, may elect to redeem part or all of outstanding
principal for the Companys common stock. The debenture holder received 1,015,625 warrants to purchase the Companys common stock at $0.40 per share. The warrants expire five years from issuance. Actions to compel payment under these notes
have been stayed as a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing. These notes remain outstanding at September 30, 2009.

Management
concluded the secured convertible debenture met the definition of a derivative financial instrument and required bifurcation under ASC 815. The resulting derivative liability is further discussed in Note 1. Proceeds from the debenture were allocated
to debt and derivative liabilities based on the relative fair values of the debt and derivatives. The resulting discount on the debt will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the effective interest method.



F-24



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



12. Related party transactions

Notes payable, related party consists of the following:



|                                              |  |               |           |      |   |            |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                              |  | September 30, |          
|                                              |  | 2009          |           | 2008 |  
|Accentia promissory demand notes  prime rate |  | $             | 332,000   |      | $ | 10,130,000 |  
|Secured convertible debenture  15%           |  |               |          |      |   | 500,000    |  
|Unsecured convertible promissory note  10%   |  |               |          |      |   | 1,000,000  |  
|Unsecured promissory note  prime plus 2%     |  |               |          |      |   | 46,000     |  
|Debtor-in-possession note  16%               |  |               | 1,250,000 |      |   |           |  
|Accrued interest                              |  |               | 82,000    |      |   | 1,729,000  |  
|                                              |  |               |           |      |   |            |  
|                                              |  |               | 1,664,000 |      |   | 13,405,000 |  
|Less unamortized discounts                    |  |               |          |      |   | (5,525,000 | )
|                                              |  |               |           |      |   |            |  
|                                              |  | $             | 1,664,000 |      | $ | 7,880,000  |  
|                                              |  |               |           |      |   |            |  

Accentia promissory demand notes:

Notes payable, related parties includes amounts advanced under three secured promissory demand notes issued to Accentia, bearing interest at the prime
rate. On February 5, 2008 the terms of these notes were modified to allow Accentia the option to convert part or all of the principal and interest due into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $1.10 per share
subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations or in the event of the sale of the Companys stock at prices below the conversion price. On September 22, 2008, as provided for under the adjustment provisions of the
conversion option, the conversion price was modified to allow Accentia to convert part or all of the principal and interest due into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price of $0.32 per share. The Company granted piggyback
and demand registration rights to Accentia for the shares underlying this Conversion Option.

Management concluded that
the February 5thmodification added a substantive
conversion option to these notes and thus applied debt extinguishment accounting to the transaction resulting in a $4.9 million gain on modification, recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital on the Companys consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2009. The new debt instrument was recorded at a discount to the carrying value of the notes prior to modification and will be amortized over the expected repayment term of the notes, a three year period.

The balance due under these notes was $12.0 million, including accrued interest, as of November 10, 2008, the date of the Companys voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 protection. This balance has been reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 (Note 1). Since filing for Chapter 11, the Company
has continued to draw on this line of credit through payments made by Accentia directly to third parties on the Companys behalf as well as through the allocation of inter-company expenses for shared resources. Additionally, the Company has
continued to accrue interest at prime on the outstanding principal due under the note.

Secured Convertible Debenture:

On September 11, 2007, the Company issued two unsecured promissory notes to two directors of the Company in the aggregate amount of $0.2 million. The
loans initially bore interest at prime plus 2.0% and are matured on September 10, 2008. On September 26, 2008, the loans were converted into the terms of the 15% secured convertible debenture as discussed below. The Company issued
five-year warrants to purchase 909,090 shares of the Companys common stock at $1.10 per share in conjunction with the initial issuance of these loans in September 2007. In accordance with ASC 470  Debt, proceeds were allocated to debt
and stockholders equity based on the relative fair values of the debt and the warrants. Interest expense of approximately $90,000 and $4,000 was incurred on these notes during the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

On October 12, 2007, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to a director of the Company in the amount of $0.3 million. This
loan originally bore interest at prime plus 2.0% and is payable October 11, 2008. The Company issued warrants to purchase 2,727,270 shares of the Companys common stock at $1.10 per share in conjunction with this loan. Proceeds from the
loan were allocated to debt and stockholders equity based on the relative fair values of the debt and the warrants. On September 26, 2008 this note was converted into the terms of the 15% secured convertible debenture as discussed below.



F-25



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



12. Related party transactions (contd)

Secured Convertible Debenture (contd):

On September 22, 2008, the Company entered into definitive agreements with three investors, all of whom are affiliates, related to a private
placement of its 15% Secured Convertible Debentures (the Debentures). The definitive documents permit the Company to place up to $5.0 million in principal amount of its Debentures (the Private Placement). The Company has sold
$1.150 million in principal amount of its Debentures to three investors (the Initial Tranche).

The Debentures are convertible
into the Companys common stock at $0.32 per share (the Conversion Price) and, provided certain conditions are satisfied, the Company may, at its option, redeem the Debentures for an amount equal to 110% of the then outstanding
principal. Each purchaser of Debentures in the Private Placement has the right to elect to be repaid in one of the following methods: a) Commencing six months after closing, the Debentures will be amortized through twelve equal monthly payments; or
b) A single lump-sum payment of all remaining outstanding principal and accrued interest shall be made on March 31, 2010. All principal amortization payments and monthly interest payments will be made in cash or the Company may elect to make
the payments in shares of its common stock. The Companys ability to pay interest with shares of Company common stock will be subject to specified conditions, including the existence of an effective registration statement covering the resale of
the shares issued in payment of redemption amount unless the shares may be resold pursuant to Rule 144 without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions or current public information requirements. Any common stock delivered in satisfaction of an
amortization payment will be valued at the lesser of (i) the conversion price in effect at the time of the amortization payment or (ii) 90% of the average of the daily volume weighted average price of the shares for the 20 trading
days prior to the amortization payment date. The Company has the ability to make payment of interest with shares of the Companys common stock if the conditions stated herein are not met, upon the consent of the holder of the Debenture, and in
that event the common stock delivered in satisfaction of an amortization payment will be valued at the lesser of (i) the conversion price in effect at the time of the amortization payment or (ii) 80% of the average of the daily volume
weighted average price of the shares for the 20 trading days prior to the amortization payment date.

As a part of the Initial Tranche of the
Private Placement, the Company issued Warrants to the purchasers of the Debentures giving them the right to purchase 1,796,875 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share (the Exercise Price). The
warrant exercise prices are subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, and the like. Additionally, the Debentures issued in the Initial Tranche permit the holders to convert into 3,593,750 shares of the Companys common stock.

On October 29, 2008, and effective as of October 15, 2008, the Company closed an additional agreement with one additional investor
related to a private placement of its 15% Secured Convertible Debentures. The Company sold $0.3 million in principal amount of its Debentures to the investor.

In the event that the Company issues or grants in the future any rights to purchase any of the Companys common stock, or other securities
convertible into the Companys common stock, for an effective per share price less than the Conversion Price or in the instance of warrants the Exercise Price then in effect, the conversion price of all unconverted Debentures and the Exercise
Price of all unexercised Warrants will be decreased to equal such lower price. The above-described adjustments to the Conversion Price and Exercise Price for future stock issuances by the Company will not apply to certain exempt issuances, including
stock issuances pursuant to employee stock option plans and strategic transactions.

Actions to compel payment under these notes have been
stayed as a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing. These notes remain outstanding at September 30, 2009.Future payment provisions under this note have been stayed and accordingly, the entire balance due under these notes has been
reclassified to Liabilities subject to compromise on the Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 (Note 1).

Management concluded that the
September 26thmodifications added a substantive
conversion option to the pre-existing notes and thus applied debt extinguishment accounting to the transaction resulting in a $156,000 loss on extinguishment of debt recorded on the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended September 30, 2008. Furthermore, the newly issued secured convertible debentures met the definition of derivative financial instruments and required bifurcation under ASC 815. The resulting derivative liabilities are further discussed in
Note 1. Proceeds from the debenture were allocated to debt and derivative liabilities based on the relative fair values of the debt and derivatives. The resulting discount on the debt will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the
debentures using the effective interest method.



F-26



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



12. Related party transactions (contd)

Unsecured Promissory Note:

On
September 26, 2007, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to a shareholder of Accentia in the amount of $46,015. This loan bears interest at prime plus 2.0%, is payable October 1, 2009, and is subordinated to the Companys
outstanding loan to Laurus. The Company issued five-year warrants to purchase 25,099 shares of the Companys common stock at $1.10 per share in conjunction with this loan. Proceeds from this note were allocated to debt and stockholders
equity based on the relative fair values of the debt and the warrants. As a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, payment provisions under this note have been stayed and accordingly, the entire balance due under
these notes has been reclassified to Liabilities subject to compromise on the Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 (Note 1).

Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note:

On May 9, 2008, the Company entered into a financing transaction with one of the Companys directors, whereby the Company issued a convertible
promissory note in the amount of $1.0 million, bearing interest at 10% and with a maturity date of the earlier to occur of one year from the date of issuance, or, at the election of the lender, upon closing of a financing transaction resulting in
net proceeds to the Company of at least $15.0 million. Interest only was payable monthly and may be paid by issuance of the Companys restricted common stock, calculated at a price of $0.50 per share. At any time after issuance of the note the
lender may elect to convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the note into common stock of the Company, at a conversion price equal to $0.50 per share. As part of this transaction the

Company issued to the lender a warrant to purchase up to 2.0 million shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per
share, with cashless exercise provisions and a 7-year term. In addition, the Company entered into an option agreement with the lender whereby the lender may elect, at any time before the earlier to occur of i) notice of a signed term sheet for a
financing of specified magnitude or ii) maturity of the note as defined therein, to increase his loan by an amount of up to the full original loan amount ($1.0 million) upon the same terms as contained in the original note, including issuance of
additional warrants with the same term, exercise price, and cashless exercise provisions. Prior to the Companys Chapter 11 filing on November 10, 2008, 33,974 shares of the Companys common stock were issued to the note holder in
satisfaction of interest due. Actions to compel payment under these notes have been stayed as a result of the Companys Chapter 11 filing , and accordingly, the outstanding balance on these notes has been reclassified to Liabilities
subject to compromise on the Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 (Note 1).

Under
applicable accounting guidance the Company is required to value the warrants and beneficial conversion feature granted with this debt (BCF) separately from the note. The warrants issued with the debt, as well as the option agreement with
the lender, whereby the lender may elect to increase his loan by an additional $1.0 million met the requirements equity classification. As such, the additional loan option has not been accounted for as a derivative (which would be marked to market
each reporting period) and in the event the option is exercised, no gain or loss is recognized. The value assigned to the warrants ($0.25 million), the BCF ($0.36 million) and the option agreement ($0.39 million) was initially recorded as a discount
to the face value of the note and an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital. The debt discount ($1.0 million aggregate) will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the note under the effective interest method.

On June 12, 2008, the Company entered into a financing transaction with one of the Companys directors, whereby the Company issued a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $0.2 million, bearing interest at 10% and with a maturity date of the earlier to occur of one year from the date of issuance, or, upon the repayment of a short term loan provided by the Company to
Accentia in the amount of $0.2 million. On June 25, 2008, having received repayment of its short term loan to Accentia in the amount of $0.2 million, the Company repaid the principal amount due under this note. Interest was payable monthly and
was paid by issuance of the Companys restricted common stock, calculated at a price of $0.50 per share. As part of this transaction the Company issued to the lender a warrant to purchase up to 400,000 shares of the Companys common stock
for a period of seven years at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, with cashless exercise provisions

Similar to the
May 9thfinancing above, the value of the warrants
($81,000) and beneficial conversion feature ($49,000) granted with this debt were required to be recorded as a discount to the face value of the note with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital. As the note was repaid on June 25,
2008, the full discount amount of $130,000 has been amortized to interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2008.



F-27



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



12. Related party transactions (contd)

Debtor-in-possession note:

On
December 22, 2008, the Company completed the closing of a debtor-in-possession financing transaction (the DIP Transaction) with Corps Real, LLC, a Illinois limited liability company, the principal owner is a director of or
affiliated with directors of the Company (the DIP Lender). Pursuant to the transaction, the DIP Lender provided to the Company a secured line of credit in an amount of up to $3.0 million in accordance with an order entered by the
Bankruptcy Court. As of September 30, 2009, the DIP Lender had advanced $1.25 million to the Company.

The DIP Transaction was
memorialized by a Secured Promissory Note (the DIP Note) and Security Agreement dated December 22, 2008. The following describes certain material terms of the DIP Transaction:



| |  |  | Principal Amount- Up to $3.0 million
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | Priority and Security- The facility is a secured super-priority loan to a Debtor-in-Possession and is secured by all assets of the Company that
is senior to all prior and existing liens of Biovest.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Advances under the Facility- For all amounts in excess of $1.0 million, Lender and the Company shall within 30 days of the entry of the Initial
Order agree on a list of milestone events to be achieved by the Company through use of these Advances, and the Company shall be required to make a written request(s) detailing the amount and use and Lender shall in its reasonable
discretion approve or reject the written request based upon whether the Company demonstrates reasonable progress in achieving the agreed milestones.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Term- All loans outstanding under the Facility (the Loans)shall become due and payable on the earlier of:
(i) December 31, 2010; (ii) dismissal of the Chapter 11 proceeding; (iii) conversion of the Chapter 11 proceeding to a Chapter 7 proceeding; or (iv) confirmation of the Companys Plan of Reorganization.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Interest- Loans will bear interest at 16% per annum computed on a daily basis based on the principal amount outstanding. Interest shall be
paid as follows: (i) 10% interest shall be paid monthly and (ii) 6% interest shall accrue and be paid at maturity.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Points- At the Closing, the Company paid in cash 4% of the initial $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that the Company borrows
in excess of $1.0 million, the Company shall pay in cash 4% of the second $1.0 million of the Facility ($40,000). At the time that the Company borrows in excess of $2.0 million, the Company shall pay in cash 4% of the third $1.0 million of the
Facility ($40,000).
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Expenses- The Company issued payment of $25,000 in costs at the Closing.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Prepayment- Loans may be prepaid at any time in an amount of $50,000 or multiples of $50,000 in excess thereof, provided, however, that the
Companys senior secured lender (Laurus and the Valens Funds) provides its consent to each prepayment via written notification to the Company and Lender.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warrants issued to related parties

In
connection with the issuance of certain notes payable, the Company issued warrants to certain officers and directors of the Company to guaranty these notes. For the year ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate total of 2,102,460 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share to these guarantors for their continuing guarantee of the Companys outstanding debt. These warrants will expire in 2013.



F-28



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



13. Royalty liability

On April 17, 2007, the Company executed an amendment agreement with its senior lender, Laurus, to defer payments of principal on its $7.799 million
loan. As consideration for the forbearance the Company granted to Laurus a non-cancelable royalty equal to three percent of world-wide net sales of AutovaxID instruments for a period of five years commencing on May 31, 2007. Under the terms of
the royalty agreement the Companys royalty payments to Laurus are required to aggregate to a minimum of $8.0 million, and are required to be paid quarterly with $0.5 million of the minimum royalty having been paid on December 31, 2007 and
the balance (if any), less actual royalties paid, being due on May 31, 2012.

The Company recorded the royalty liability based on the
present value of the minimum payments (discounted at an annual rate of 11%) due under the Amendment. On November 10, 2008 the Company filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court (Note 2). While the Company
remains a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, it is not anticipated that payment will be made on the royalty obligation. Managements estimate of the balance due on the royalty obligation has been reclassified to Liabilities
subject to compromise on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.

14. Derivative
liabilities

As a result of the Companys Chapter 11 proceedings, derivative liabilities listed in the table below as of
September 30, 2008 became prepetition indebtedness under the Debtors plan of reorganization. Accordingly, these obligations have been classified as Liabilities subject to compromise in the Companys condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2009. See Note 1 for further details.

The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to
hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have entered into certain other financial instruments and contracts, such as debt financing arrangements and freestanding warrants
with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. These instruments are required to be
carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value.

The following table discloses the fair value of the Companys derivative liabilities
and their location in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company held no asset derivatives at either reporting date.



|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                    |           |                        |                        |            |   |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | --------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------- | - | -------
|                                                                     |  | Liability Derivatives           
|                                                                     |  | September 30, 2009               |  | September 30, 2008
|                                                                     |  | Balance Sheet Location           |  | Fair Value         |           | Balance Sheet Location |                        | Fair Value
|Derivatives designated as hedging instruments                        |  | none                             |  | $                  |          |                        | none                   |            | $ |       
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments                    |  |                                  |  |                    |           |                        |                        |            |   |        
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|Biovax Investment, LLC investor put option (Note 2)                  |  | Liabilities subject tocompromise |  | $                  | 122,000   |                        | Derivative liabilities |            | $ | 109,000
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|AutovaxID Investment, LLC investor put option (Note 2)               |  | Liabilities subject tocompromise |  |                    | 75,000    |                        | Derivative liabilities |            |   | 67,000 
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|Derivatives resulting from issuance of Secured Convertible Debenture |  | Liabilities subject tocompromise |  |                    | 1,883,000 |                        | Derivative liabilities |            |   | 729,000
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                    |           |                        |                        |            |   |        
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments              |  |                                  |  | $                  | 2,080,000 |                        |                        |            | $ | 905,000
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                    |           |                        |                        |            |   |        
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                   
|Total derivatives                                                    |  |                                  |  | $                  | 2,080,000 |                        |                        |            | $ | 905,000
|                                                                     |  |                                  |  |                    |           |                        |                        |            |   |        



F-29



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



14. Derivative liabilities (contd)

Secured Convertible Debenture:

In
September, 2008, the Company issued to Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC, as well as to two other affiliates, secured convertible debentures in the principal amount of $1.15 million. The debentures issued embodied terms and features which met the definition of
derivative financial instruments under ASC 815. The components of the derivative consist of an embedded conversion option, anti-dilution protection, monthly redemption features, detachable warrants as well as default and non-delivery puts. These
derivative features were not afforded the exemption available to derivatives indexed to a companys own stock and accordingly have been bifurcated from the host instrument and classified as a liability recorded at fair value.

15. Liabilities subject to compromise

As a result of the Companys Chapter 11 proceedings, the payment of prepetition indebtedness may be subject to compromise or other treatment
under the Debtors plan of reorganization. Although actions to enforce or otherwise effect payment of prepetition liabilities are stayed, at hearings held in November 2008, the Court granted approval of the Debtors first day
motions, generally designed to stabilize the Debtors operations and covering, among other things, human capital obligations, business operations, tax matters, cash management, utilities, case management and retention of professionals.

The Debtors have been paying and intend to continue to pay undisputed post-petition claims in the ordinary course of business. In addition,
the Debtors may reject prepetition executory contracts and unexpired leases with respect to the Debtors operations, with the approval of the Court. Damages resulting from rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases are treated as
general unsecured claims and will be classified as liabilities subject to compromise. On April 8, 2009, the Court entered an order establishing June 1, 2009 as the bar date (the Bar Date). The Bar Date is the date by which
claims against the Debtors arising prior to the Debtors Chapter 11 filings must be filed if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the Chapter 11 cases. On April 8, 2009, the Debtors commenced notification, including
publication, to all known actual and potential creditors informing them of the Bar Date and the required procedures with respect to the filing of proofs of claim. As part of the reorganization case, claims timely filed by the Bar Date will
ultimately be reconciled against the amounts listed by the Debtors in their Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (as amended). To the extent that the Debtors object to any filed claims, the Bankruptcy Court will make the final determination as to the
amount, nature, and validity of such claims. Moreover, the treatment of allowed claims against the Debtors will be determined pursuant to the terms of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Accordingly, the
ultimate amount and treatment of such liabilities has not yet been determined.

Applicable accounting guidance requires prepetition
liabilities that are subject to compromise to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. The amounts currently classified as liabilities subject to compromise may be subject to future
adjustments depending on Court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, or other events.

Contractual interest expense represents amounts due under the contractual terms of outstanding debt, including debt subject to compromise for which
interest expense may not be recognized in accordance with ASC 852. The Company recorded contractual interest expense on all of its outstanding debt for the year ended September 30, 2009 due to the uncertain nature of the provisions of the plan
of reorganization to be filed with the Bankruptcy Court at a future date.



F-30



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



15. Liabilities subject to compromise (contd)

Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following:



|                                                                                                  |  |                    |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                  |  | September 30, 2009 |           
|Secured promissory notes payable to Laurus and its affiliates, the Valens Funds (Notes 10 and 11) |  | $                  | 14,681,000 |  
|Secured promissory demand notes payable to Accentia (Note 12)                                     |  |                    | 10,279,000 |  
|Secured convertible debentures  15% (Notes 11 and 12)                                            |  |                    | 1,450,000  |  
|Unsecured promissory notes payable to Pulaski Bank (Note 10)*                                     |  |                    | 1,000,000  |  
|Unsecured promissory note payable to Southwest Bank (Note 10)*                                    |  |                    | 200,000    |  
|Unsecured convertible promissory note  10% (Note 12)                                             |  |                    | 1,000,000  |  
|Minimum royalty due to Laurus on net sales of AutovaxID instrumentation (Note 13)                 |  |                    | 7,500,000  |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                  |  |                    | 3,817,000  |  
|Derivative liabilities (Note 1)                                                                   |  |                    | 2,080,000  |  
|Provision for indemnity agreements*                                                               |  |                    | 3,895,000  |  
|Provision for rejected lease**                                                                    |  |                    |           |  
|Other                                                                                             |  |                    | 1,120,000  |  
|Accrued interest and fees                                                                         |  |                    | 11,978,000 |  
|                                                                                                  |  |                    |            |  
|                                                                                                  |  |                    | 59,000,000 |  
|Less: unamortized discounts                                                                       |  |                    | (5,020,000 | )
|                                                                                                  |  |                    |            |  
|                                                                                                  |  | $                  | 53,980,000 |  



|* | The notes, issued to Pulaski Bank and Southwest Bank are guaranteed by individuals affiliated with the Company or Accentia. The Company agreed to indemnify and hold
harmless each guarantor should their guarantees be called by the lenders. In addition, in the event of default by the Company resulting in a payment to the lender by the guarantors, the Company agreed to compensate each affected guarantor by
issuance of that number of shares of the Companys restricted common stock determined by dividing 700% of the amount guaranteed by $1.10. In December 2008, Pulaski Bank called the guarantees resulting in an aggregate payment of $1.0 million by
the guarantors. In January 2009, Southwest Bank called its guarantee resulting in an aggregate payment of $0.2 million by the guarantor. As a result of their indemnification agreements, the guarantors are allowed an unsecured claim for approximately
7.6 million shares of Biovest common stock having a fair value of $3.9 million as of September 30, 2009.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | In an effort to decrease operating expenses, the Company through its Chapter 11 proceedings rejected its lease in Worcester, Massachusetts on December 8, 2008. The
Company initially recorded a provision of $600k to allow for damages resulting from the rejection of this unexpired lease, which are treated by the bankruptcy code as general unsecured claims and are limited to either 15 percent of the balance of
the rent reserved in the lease or the rent reserved for one year from the filing date or the date the premises were surrendered, whichever is earlier. On July 17, 2009, the Company, through an approved order by the bankruptcy court, settled
this claim for a one-time payment of $14k issued on September 15, 2009.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-31



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



16. Stockholders equity

Preferred stock:

The Company has
authorized 50.0 million shares of preferred stock. As of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, no preferred shares were issued or outstanding.

Common stock:

The Company has
authorized 300.0 million shares of common stock. For the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued the following:



| |  |  | 964,306 restricted shares of common stock in payment of interest accrued on debt outstanding.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 100,000 restricted shares of common stock to Pulaski Bank and Trust as consideration for extending the maturity date on the Companys debt
obligations.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the year ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued the following:



| |  |  | 332,218 restricted shares of common stock in satisfaction of certain current and past due professional fees in the approximate amount of $420,000.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 450,000 restricted shares of common stock to Pulaski Bank and Trust as consideration for extending the maturity date on the Companys debt
obligations.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 64,439 restricted shares of common stock to a director of the Company in payment for interest accrued on convertible notes outstanding.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

17. Common stock options and warrants

Stock Option Plans:

The Companys
2000 Stock Option Plan was approved and made effective by the Companys stockholders and Board of Directors on July 19, 2000 (the 2000 Plan). The Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) was
approved by the Companys Board of Directors (the Board) on November 2, 2006, and by the written consent of holders of a majority of the Companys shares of common stock on October 4, 2007. The 2000 Plan and 2006
Plan are collectively, the Stock Option Plans. The purposes of the Stock Option Plans are to create incentives designed to motivate employees to significantly contribute toward the Companys growth and profitability, to provide the
Companys executives, directors and other employees, and persons who, by their position, ability and diligence, are able to make important contributions to the Companys growth and profitability, with an incentive to assist the Company in
achieving its long-term corporate objectives, to attract and retain executives and other employees of outstanding competence, and to provide such persons with an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the Company.

The Stock Option Plans are administered by a committee appointed by the Board. All members of such a committee must be non-employee directors and outside
directors, as defined in the Stock Option Plans. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Stock Option Plans, the administrator has the authority to grant options and to determine the purchase price of the shares of the Companys common
stock covered by each option, the term of each option, the number of shares of the Companys common stock to be covered by each option, to establish vesting schedules, to designate options as incentive stock options or non-qualified stock
options, and to determine the persons to whom grants are to be made.



F-32



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



17. Common stock options and warrants (contd)

Stock Option Plan (contd):

The
Stock to be subject to awards under the Stock Option Plans may be either authorized and un-issued shares or shares held in the treasury of the Company. The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be granted under the 2006 Plan, subject to
adjustment in accordance with the provisions of the 2006 Plan, is 20.0 million shares. For the purpose of computing the total number of shares of stock remaining available for awards under the Stock Option Plans at any time while the Stock
Option Plans are in effect, the total number of shares shall be reduced by: (1) the maximum number of shares of stock subject to issuance upon exercise of outstanding options or outstanding stock appreciation rights granted under the 2006 Plan;
(2) the maximum number of shares of stock subject to issuance upon exercise of outstanding options or outstanding stock appreciation rights granted under the 2000 Plan; and (3) the maximum number of shares related to outstanding other
stock-based awards granted under these Stock Option Plans, as determined by the Board in each case as of the dates on which such awards were granted. The shares involved in the unexercised or undistributed portion of any terminated, expired or
forfeited awards, including any unexercised or undistributed portion of any terminated, expired or forfeited award under the 2000 Plan, will be made available for further Stock Option Plans awards. The Stock Option Plans permit the grant of
restricted stock, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock-appreciation rights, and phantom stock awards.

Awards granted
under the Stock Option Plans that have not vested will generally terminate immediately upon the grantees termination of employment or business relationship with us or any of the Companys subsidiaries for any reason other than retirement
with the Companys consent, disability or death. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board may determine at the time of the grant that an award agreement should contain provisions permitting the grantee to exercise the stock options
for any stated period after such termination, or for any period the Board or a committee of the Board determines to be advisable after the grantees employment or business relationship with us terminates by reason of retirement, disability,
death or termination without cause. Incentive Stock Options will, however, terminate no more than three months after termination of the optionees employment and twelve months after termination of the optionees employment due to
disability. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board may permit a deceased optionees stock options to be exercised by the optionees executor or heirs during a period acceptable to the Board or a committee of the Board following
the date of the optionees death but such exercise must occur prior to the expiration date of the stock option.

Under generally accepted
accounting principles with respect to the financial accounting treatment of stock options used to compensate employees, upon the grant of stock options under the Companys Stock Option Plans, the fair value of the options will be measured on
the date of grant and this amount will be recognized as compensation expense ratably over the service period, usually corresponding to the vesting period. Stock appreciation rights granted under the Stock Option Plans must be settled in common
stock. Therefore, stock appreciation rights granted under the Stock Option Plans will receive the same accounting treatment as options. The cash the Company receives upon the exercise of stock options will be reflected as an increase in the
Companys capital. No additional compensation expense will be recognized at the time stock options are exercised, although the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise may reduce basic earnings per share, as more shares of the
Companys common stock would then be outstanding.

In the case of a grant of restricted stock, the fair value of the restricted stock
award at the date of grant will be determined and this amount will be recognized over the service period of the award, usually the vesting period. The fair value of a restricted stock award is equal to the fair market value of the Companys
common stock on the date of grant.



F-33



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



17. Common stock options and warrants (contd)

Stock Option Plans (contd):

Stock
option activity for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:



|                                  |  |            |   |  |                              |      |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------ | ---- | ----------------------- | - | ---------
|                                  |  | Shares     |   |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |      | WeightedAverageContractual Life |      | WeightedAverage GrantDate Fair Value |      | AggregateIntrinsicValue
|Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |  | 8,747,538  |   |  |                              | 0.74 |                                 | 7.18 |                                      | 0.30 |                         |   |         
|Exercisable at September 30, 2007 |  | 7,290,795  |   |  |                              | 0.75 |                                 | 6.90 |                                      | 0.27 |                         |   |         
|                                  |  |            |   |  |                             
|Granted                           |  | 2,339,000  |   |  |                              | 0.62 |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|Exercised                         |  |           |   |  |                              |     |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|Cancelled                         |  | (1,614,742 | ) |  |                              | 0.67 |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|                                  |  |            |   |  |                             
|Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |  | 9,471,796  |   |  |                              | 0.72 |                                 | 6.77 |                                      | 0.32 |                         |   |         
|Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |  | 9,113,462  |   |  | $                            | 0.72 |                                 | 6.72 |                                      | 0.32 |                         |   |         
|                                  |  |            |   |  |                             
|Granted (1)                       |  | 6,340,000  |   |  |                              | 0.06 |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|Exercised                         |  |           |   |  |                              |     |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|Cancelled                         |  | (2,874,239 | ) |  |                              | 0.62 |                                 |      |                                      |      |                         |   |          
|                                  |  |            |   |  |                             
|Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |  | 12,937,557 |   |  |                              | 0.42 |                                 | 6.86 |                                      | 0.18 |                         | $ | 2,853,000
|Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |  | 6,610,890  |   |  | $                            | 0.76 |                                 | 5.42 |                                      | 0.31 |                         | $ | 21,000   

|(1) | The options are restricted for exercise until confirmation of our bankruptcy plan.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of the stock option grants:



|                         |  |                            |  |              
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------
|                         |  | Years Ending September 30,
|                         |  | 2009                       |  | 2008         
|Expected volatility      |  | 81% - 118%                 |  | 80% - 160%   
|Expected life            |  | 5.5 to 5.6 years           |  | 5 to 7 years 
|Risk-free interest rates |  | 2.01% - 2.18%              |  | 2.57% - 4.53%
|Dividend yields          |  | none                       |  | none         

The following tables summarize
information for options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2009:



|                         |  |                     |  |                                       |  |                            |       |                   |           |                                       |      |                            |   |     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | ----------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------- | ---- | -------------------------- | - | ----
|                         |  | Options Outstanding |  | Options Exercisable                  
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | NumberOutstanding   |  | Weighted AveRemaining ContractualLife |  | Weighted AveExercise Price |       | NumberExercisable |           | Weighted AveRemaining ContractualLife |      | Weighted AveExercise Price
|$ 0.01-1.00              |  | 11,273,957          |  | 8.69                                  |  | $                          | 0.30  |                   | 4,947,290 |                                       | 6.53 |                            | $ | 0.60
|1.01-2.00                |  | 1,653,600           |  | 3.82                                  |  |                            | 1.21  |                   | 1,653,600 |                                       | 3.82 |                            |   | 1.21
|2.01-3.00                |  | 10,000              |  | 1.92                                  |  |                            | 3.00  |                   | 10,000    |                                       | 1.92 |                            |   | 3.00
|                         |  |                     |  |                                       |  |                            |       |                   |           |                                       |      |                            |   |     
|                         |  | 12,937,557          |  | 6.86                                  |  |                            | 0. 42 |                   | 6,610,890 |                                       | 5.42 |                            |   | 0.76



F-34



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



17. Common stock options and warrants (contd)

Stock Option Plans (contd):

The
Company recognized $0.2 million and $1.5 million in total employee stock-based compensation expense for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested employee stock options as
of September 30, 2009, and changes during the two years then ended is presented below:



|                                 |  |           |   |  |                                  |     
|-------------------------------- |  | --------- | - |  | -------------------------------- | ----
|Non-vested Options               |  | Shares    |   |  | Weighted AveGrant-DateFair Value
|Non-vested at September 30, 2007 |  | 1,456,743 |   |  |                                  | 0.42
|Granted                          |  | 30,000    |   |  |                                  | 0.44
|Vested                           |  | (963,512  | ) |  |                                  | 0.45
|Cancelled                        |  | (164,897  | ) |  |                                  | 0.54
|                                 |  |          
|Non-vested at September 30, 2008 |  | 358,334   |   |  | $                                | 0.31
|Granted                          |  | 6,340,000 |   |  |                                  | 0.04
|Vested                           |  | (23,333   | ) |  |                                  | 0.23
|Cancelled                        |  | (348,334  | ) |  |                                  | 0.29
|                                 |  |          
|Non-vested at September 30, 2009 |  | 6,326,667 |   |  | $                                | 0.04

As of September 30, 2009, there
was $105,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately one year.

Common Stock Warrants:

Stock warrants
issued, exercised and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:



|                                  |  |              |   |  |               
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------ | - |  | --------------
|                                  |  | Weighted Ave
|Warrants                          |  | Shares       |   |  | Exercise Price
|Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |  | 21,693,701   |   |  | 0.43          
|Exercisable at September 30, 2007 |  | 20,493,701   |   |  | 0.38          
|                                  |  |             
|Issued                            |  | 9,676,704    |   |  | 0.61          
|Exercised                         |  |             |   |  |              
|Cancelled                         |  | (150,000     | ) |  | 0.75          
|                                  |  |             
|Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |  | 31,220,405   |   |  | 0.35          
|Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |  | 30,020,405   |   |  | 0.31          
|                                  |  |             
|Issued                            |  | 843,750      |   |  | 0.25          
|Exercised                         |  |             |   |  |              
|Cancelled                         |  |             |   |  |              
|                                  |  |             
|Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |  | 32,064,155   |   |  | 0.35          
|Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |  | 31,164,155   |   |  | 0.32          



F-35



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



18. Segment information

The Company operates in three identifiable industry segments. The Companys Cell Culture products and services are engaged in the
production and contract manufacturing of biologic drugs and cell production for research institutions worldwide. The Instruments and Disposables segment is engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of patented cell culture systems,
equipment and consumable parts to pharmaceutical, diagnostic and biotechnology companies, as well as leading research institutions worldwide. The Therapeutic Vaccine segment, which has generated no revenues to date, is focused on developing
BiovaxID®, as described earlier.

The Company defines its segment operating results as earnings/(loss) before general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income, other
income, and income taxes. Under the Companys shared resources concept, assets of the Company are common to the segments listed below and thus not segregated for reporting purposes. Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocated to
identifiable assets was $2.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and has not been allocated to the segments listed below. Segment information is as follows:



|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ---------- | - | -------------------------- | - | --------- | ------------------ |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                    |  | Year ended September 30, 2009 |           
|                                                                                                    |  | Cell CultureServices          |            |   | Instruments andDisposables |   |           | TherapeuticVaccine |  |   | Total      |  
|Revenues:                                                                                           |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Products                                                                                            |  | $                             |           |   |                            | $ | 2,175,000 |                    |  | $ |           |   |  | $ | 2,175,000   |  
|Services                                                                                            |  |                               | 1,481,000  |   |                            |   |          |                    |  |   |           |   |  |   | 1,481,000   |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Total Revenues                                                                                      |  |                               | 1,481,000  |   |                            |   | 2,175,000 |                    |  |   |           |   |  |   | 3,656,000   |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Costs and Expenses:                                                                                 |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Cost of revenue                                                                                     |  |                               | (1,456,000 | ) |                            |   | (996,000  | )                  |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,452,000  | )
|Research and development                                                                            |  |                               |           |   |                            |   |          |                    |  |   | (1,060,000 | ) |  |   | (1,060,000  | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Operating income/(loss) including segment identifiable expenses                                     |  | $                             | 25,000     |   |                            | $ | 1,179,000 |                    |  | $ | (1,060,000 | ) |  |   | 144,000     |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |  
|General and administrative expense                                                                  |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (2,915,000  | )
|Other income/(expense), net                                                                         |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (12,338,000 | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities and income taxes |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (15,109,000 | )
|Non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities                                  |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | 455,000     |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before income taxes                                                                        |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (14,654,000 | )
|Income taxes                                                                                        |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                                            |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  | $ | (14,654,000 | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  



F-36



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



18. Segment information (contd)



|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ---------- | - | -------------------------- | - | ---------- | ------------------ |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                    |  | Year ended September 30, 2008 |           
|                                                                                                    |  | Cell CultureServices          |            |   | Instruments andDisposables |   |            | TherapeuticVaccine |  |   | Total      |  
|Revenues:                                                                                           |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Products                                                                                            |  | $                             |           |   |                            | $ | 3,310,000  |                    |  | $ |           |   |  | $ | 3,310,000   |  
|Services                                                                                            |  |                               | 1,965,000  |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   |           |   |  |   | 1,965,000   |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Total Revenues                                                                                      |  |                               | 1,965,000  |   |                            |   | 3,310,000  |                    |  |   |           |   |  |   | 5,275,000   |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Costs and Expenses:                                                                                 |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Cost of revenue                                                                                     |  |                               | (1,132,000 | ) |                            |   | (1,832,000 | )                  |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,964,000  | )
|Research and development                                                                            |  |                               |           |   |                            |   |           |                    |  |   | (3,514,000 | ) |  |   | (3,514,000  | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Operating income/(loss) including segment identifiable expenses                                     |  | $                             | 833,000    |   |                            | $ | 1,478,000  |                    |  | $ | (3,514,000 | ) |  |   | (1,203,000  | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |  
|General and administrative expense                                                                  |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (5,569,000  | )
|Other income/(expense), net                                                                         |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (14,364,000 | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities and income taxes |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (21,136,000 | )
|Non-controlling interest in losses from variable interest entities                                  |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | 496,000     |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before income taxes                                                                        |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   | (20,640,000 | )
|Income taxes                                                                                        |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                                            |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  | $ | (20,640,000 | )
|                                                                                                    |  |                               |            |   |                            |   |            |                    |  |   |            |   |  |   |             |  

19. Income taxes

The significant income components of the Companys net deferred total are as follows:



|                                               |  |                           |             |   |      |   |             |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | -
|                                               |  | Year Ending September 30, |            
|                                               |  | 2009                      |             |   | 2008 |  
|Interest due to tax affiliated group           |  | $                         | 893,000     |   |      | $ | 821,000     |  
|Loss on restructure of related party agreement |  |                           | 2,519,000   |   |      |   | 2,519,000   |  
|Related party financing cost                   |  |                           | 468,000     |   |      |   | 468,000     |  
|Loss on modification of debt                   |  |                           | 2,652,000   |   |      |   | 2,652,000   |  
|Loss on impairment                             |  |                           | 1,433,000   |   |      |   | 1,433,000   |  
|Basis difference in fixed assets               |  |                           | 931,000     |   |      |   | 899,000     |  
|Stock option compensation                      |  |                           | 448,000     |   |      |   | 442,000     |  
|Net operating loss carryover                   |  |                           | 28,910,000  |   |      |   | 23,295,000  |  
|Other                                          |  |                           | 484,000     |   |      |   | 704,000     |  
|                                               |  |                           |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Total deferred tax asset                       |  |                           | 38,738,000  |   |      |   | 33,233,000  |  
|                                               |  |                           |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Less: valuation allowance                      |  |                           | (38,738,000 | ) |      |   | (33,233,000 | )
|                                               |  |                           |             |   |      |   |             |  
|Net deferred tax asset                         |  | $                         |            |   |      | $ |            |  
|                                               |  |                           |             |   |      |   |             |  



F-37



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



19. Income taxes (contd)

The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:



|                                           |  |                           |            |   |      |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                           |  | Year Ending September 30, |           
|                                           |  | 2009                      |            |   | 2008 |  
|Deferred tax                               |  |                           |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Deferred                                   |  | $                         | (1,631,000 | ) |      | $ | (7,600,000 | )
|Increase in valuation allowance            |  |                           | 1,631,000  |   |      |   | 7,600,000  |  
|                                           |  |                           |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Total provision (benefit) for income taxes |  | $                         |           |   |      | $ |           |  
|                                           |  |                           |            |   |      |   |            |  

ASC 740 requires that a deferred tax amount be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available
evidence it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized. As a result the Company recorded a valuation allowance with respect to all the Companys deferred tax assets.

For the tax periods June 17, 2003 through September 30, 2005, the Company was part of a consolidated federal income tax return that includes
Accentia. The Companys income tax provision is calculated on a separate return basis as if the Company was not part of the Accentia consolidated group for those periods presented. As of December 7, 2005, the Company became deconsolidated
from the Accentia group for income tax purposes and filed as part of the Accentia consolidated tax return for the period from October 1, 2005 through December 7, 2005 and filed a separate return for the period December 8, 2005 through
September 30, 2006.

The Company has a federal net operating loss of approximately $76.0 million as of September 30, 2009 (expiring
2021). Under Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, if an ownership change occurs with respect to a loss corporation, as defined, there are annual limitations on the amount of the net operating loss (NOL) and
other deductions which are available to the company. The portion of the NOLs incurred prior to June 17, 2003 ($3.4 million) is subject to this limitation. As such, these NOLs are limited to approximately $0.2 million per year.
NOLs incurred after June 17, 2003 may also be subject to restriction.

At the time that the Company was acquired by Accentia, it
had significant NOLs. Due to severe limitations of these NOLs and the fact that a significant portion of NOLs could never be utilized, the Company made and an election under IRS regulation 1.1502-22P32(b)(4) to waive most of the losses. The Company
waived approximately $29 million of NOLs while retaining $3.4 million.

A reconciliation of the U.S. Federal statutory rate to the effective
rate is as follows:



|                              |  |                           |    |  |      |   
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | -- |  | ---- | --
|                              |  | Year Ending September 30, |   
|                              |  | 2009                      |    |  | 2008 |   
|Federal statutory rate        |  | (34                       | )% |  | (34  | )%
|State taxes                   |  | (4                        | )% |  | (4   | )%
|Effect of valuation allowance |  | 38                        | %  |  | 38   | % 
|                              |  |                           |    |  |      |   
|Net actual effective rate     |  |                          | %  |  |     | % 
|                              |  |                           |    |  |      |   



F-38



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



20. Employee benefit plan

The Accentia 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the Employee Benefit Plan) was established effective July 1, 2004 as a defined contribution
plan. The Employee Benefit Plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The Employee Benefit Plan includes eligible employees of Accentia and its affiliates including the Company. Employees of the
Company who have completed one month of service are eligible to participate in the Employee Benefit Plan. Participants are permitted to make annual pre-tax salary reduction contributions of up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain
limitations. Employer and participant contributions are invested at the direction of the participant in various money market funds or pooled/mutual funds. Employer matching and profit sharing contributions are based upon discretionary amounts and
percentages authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made no employer contributions to the Employee Benefit Plan.

21. New Market Tax Credit transactions

April 2006 NMTC
Transaction3:

On April 25, 2006, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, Biovax, Inc. (Biovax) closed a financing transaction
(Transaction I) that was structured in an effort to obtain certain perceived advantages and enhancements from the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) regulations adopted under the auspices of the United States Department of the
Treasury in 2002 to provide incentive for investing in businesses located in qualifying census tracts, or areas with a median income below the poverty line. The NMTC was provided for in the Community Renewal Relief Act of 2000 (the
Act) and permits taxpayers (whether companies or individuals) to claim credits against their Federal income taxes for up to 39% of qualified investments in the equity of Community Development Entities (CDE). CDE are privately
managed investment institutions that are certified to make Qualified Low-Income Community Investments (QLICI). The following parties were involved in Transaction I: Accentia, Biovests majority shareholder, Biolender, LLC
(Biolender), Biovax Investment Corp., Biovax Investment, LLC (Fund), U.S. Bancorp Community Investment Corporation (US Bancorp), Telesis CDE Two, LLC (CDE), Telesis CDE Corporation, Biovax, and Laurus.
Biovax is a qualified, active low-income business and is eligible to receive investment capital under the NMTC regulations.

On March 31,
2006, in contemplation of Transaction I, Biovest closed a financing transaction with Laurus pursuant to which Laurus purchased from Biovest a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $7.799 million (the Laurus Note). Accentia
originally guaranteed 64% of any amounts outstanding under the note. On May 30, 2008, this guaranty was modified to reflect a fixed principal amount of $5.0 million. Under the terms of the Laurus Note, $7.5 million of the principal amount was
deposited into a restricted bank account of Biovest pursuant to a restricted account agreement between Biovest and Laurus. Accentia, Analytica International, Inc. (and Laurus also entered into an Amended and Restated Stock Pledge Agreement pledging
Accentias shares of TEAMM Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Analytica International, Inc., Biovest, and Biolender, who was added as obligor by way of joinder, to secure the obligations owed to Laurus as a result of the Laurus Note.

In contemplation of Transaction I, Biovest and Accentia formed Biolender, as a Delaware limited liability company. On April 21, 2006,
$2.5 million was released from the restricted account created under the Laurus Note. The release of these funds was contingent upon their use in Transaction I. These proceeds were used to purchase a 29.5% equity investment in Biolender for $2.5
million. Accentia used the proceeds of a $6.0 million intraday loan from First Bank to purchase the remaining 70.5% equity interest in Biolender. The $6.0 million loan from First Bank was fully guaranteed by two directors of Accentia. On
April 27, 2006, the Company redeemed 10 million shares of its common stock owned of record by Accentia for





|3 | In July 2010, the Company and certain of its affiliates entered into an agreement (the Worcester Restructuring Agreement) with Telesis CDE
Corporation and Telesis CDE Two, LLC (collectively, Telesis), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The Worcester Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties
pursuant to Transaction I, in consideration of retention by Telesis of an unsecured claim in the Companys Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $0.3 million along with a settlement payment in the amount of $85,000 to defray certain legal and
administrative expenses incurred by Telesis. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, the Companys Guaranty, the Guaranty by the Companys parent, Accentia, and all of the Companys subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third
parties and all other obligations to all parties to Transaction I will be terminated.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-39



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

April 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):

a $6.0 million cash payment which equaled the market price of $0.60 per share. Accentia used the proceeds of the stock redemption to repay its intraday
loan due First Bank. Subsequently, on October 31, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Accentia whereby the Company purchased Accentias 70.5% ownership interest in Biolender. In consideration of the sale of this
interest in Biolender, the Company issued to Accentia ten million shares of common stock, representing the negotiated value of the purchased interest (Note 10).

In contemplation of Transaction I, Biovax Investment, LLC (the Fund) was established. U.S. Bancorp invested $3.6 million for a 99.99% equity
interest in the Fund. Biovax Investment Corp., the Fund manager, invested an additional $100 for the remaining 0.01% equity interest. On April 25, 2006, Biolender loaned the Fund $8.5 million pursuant to a 5.18%, annual rate, senior secured,
convertible note receivable, due October 27, 2013. Interest on the note is payable as follows: (i) 0.64% interest per annum, non-compounding, shall be payable on the first day of each calendar month until October 27, 2013; and
(ii) any remaining accrued and unpaid interest shall be payable in one installment on October 27, 2013. The note is convertible at the option of the fund into shares of the Companys common stock near the maturity date.

The proceeds received by the Fund from the aforementioned financing transactions were used to make a contemporaneous 99.99% equity investment in Telesis
CDE II, LLC ($12.0 million) as well as make payment for associated management, legal and accounting fees ($0.1 million). The $12.0 million investment by the Fund to the CDE constituted a qualified equity investment (QEI) under the NMTC
Program authorized by Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), resulting in $4.7 million in tax credits.

The CDE is a Community Development Entity that is certified through the U.S. Treasury Department to make QLICI, and is managed and partially owned
(0.01%) by Telesis CDE Corporation, a private financial institution. Telesis CDE Corporation paid $1,200 in consideration for its 0.01% interest in Telesis. The CDE, upon receipt of its equity funding, contemporaneously issued $11.5 million to
Biovax for a 1.0% convertible promissory note payable, due October 27, 2013. The convertible promissory note is convertible into common stock at the option of the CDE within 5 days of the maturity date at a conversion price equaling the then
trading market price of the common stock. The overall arrangement provides that in the event the CDE converts the note payable, the aforementioned note receivable is subject to immediate conversion at the same conversion price. The Company also
issued to Telesis CDE Corporation warrants to purchase 1.2 million shares of the Companys common stock over a period of nine-years at a fixed price of $1.30. These warrants were reflected as an equity financing cost in stockholders
equity at a fair value of $517,000 computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Accentia also issued warrants to Telesis CDE Corporation to purchase 0.2 million shares of Accentias common stock over a period of seven years at a
fixed price of $9.00.

Biovax used the proceeds of the $11.5 million convertible promissory note as follows: $6.0 million was paid to Biovest
pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 18, 2006 and described further below, $1.6 million was issued as a dividend to Biovest and $1.3 million was paid to Biovest for BiovaxID anti-cancer vaccines in various stages of
production. The remaining $2.6 million was used to cover ongoing operational expenses.

The transaction was structured so that, upon maturity,
Biovax will have paid approximately $12.4 million in principal and interest payments to the CDE. The operating agreement of the CDE stipulates that in the event the QLICI is repaid in the combination of stock and cash, the stock received shall be
distributed to the Fund. Furthermore, any distributable cash received by Telesis CDE II, LLC shall be distributed to the Fund in proportion to the Funds respective percentage interest in the CDE in an amount sufficient to fully pay the
Funds note payable to Biolender. Upon maturity, the Fund will have paid approximately $11.9 million in principal and interest payments to Biolender. At maturity, total equity of the Fund is approximated to be $100,000 resulting from the
difference of $12.4 million in principal and interest payments received less $11.9 million in principal and interest paid less approximately $0.4 million in estimated operating costs of the Fund over the 7.5 year term of the notes. Biolender and US
Bancorp entered into a put option wherein US Bancorp will have the right to put



F-40



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

April 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):

its investment in the Fund to the Company near the maturity of the instruments at a price of $180,000. Management has concluded that the fair value of US
Bancorps investment in the Fund at maturity of both notes (approximately $0.1 million) would be less than the $180,000 US Bancorp would receive upon exercise of the put option and thus it is managements expectation that this option will
be exercised. Thus, prior to maturity of both notes, it is anticipated that the Fund will be 99.99% owned by Biolender. The Company accounted for this option as a derivative liability that requires recognition at fair value. The Company utilized a
probability-based, discounted cash flow approach to value the put. Accordingly, the valuation technique provided for the recognition of the full put amount ($180,000) at the present value of its cash flows, using market interest rates that would
likely be considered by market participants trading similar instruments.

Salient terms and conditions of Transaction I are as follows:



| |  |  | Under an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 18, 2006 (the Asset Purchase Agreement), Biovest transferred all or
substantially all of the assets of its vaccine manufacturing business situated at 377 Plantation Street, Worcester, Massachusetts (the Plant and the assets hereinafter the Equipment) and its rights under that certain lease
agreement for the Plant and that certain letter of intent with the landlord to potentially lease additional space adjacent to the Plant (collectively the Leasehold) to Biovax. As full purchase price for the Equipment, Biovax paid Biovest
$1.5 million. In addition, Biovax advanced rental payments for the Leasehold in the amount of $4.5 million. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, Biovest is required to treat the advance as unrestricted and non-segregated funds provided that
Biovest uses the funds to make all required lease payments. Finally, Biovax also hired all of Biovests employees related to the vaccine manufacturing business and assumed responsibility for all accrued vacation time and the maintenance of
existing health and other benefits.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The tax credits arising from the transaction were fully assigned to US Bancorp. Biovax entered into an indemnification agreement directly with US
Bancorp that provides for indemnification in the event of tax credit recapture from events caused by Biovax. Biovax is contractually required to maintain the following covenants to avoid tax credit recapture: (i) Biovax shall maintain its
status as a qualified active low-income business; (ii) At least fifty percent of the use of the tangible property of the Biovax (whether owned or leased) will be within the low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax
Code; (iii) At least fifty percent of the services performed for Biovax by its employees will be within low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax Code; (iv) Less than five percent of the average of the
unadjusted bases of the property of Biovax will be attributable to collectibles (as defined in Section 408(m)(2) of the Code, and which includes any work of art; any rug or antique; any metal or gem; any stamp or coin; and any alcoholic
beverage) other than collectibles that are held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business; (v) Less than five percent of the average of the unadjusted bases of the property of Biovax will be attributable to nonqualified
financial property (as defined in Section 1397C(e) of the Code and in Section 1.45D-1(d)(4)(i)(E) of the Regulations, and which includes debt, stock, partnership interests, options, futures contracts, forward contracts, warrants, notional
principal contracts, annuities and other similar property); (vi) No part of the business activities of Biovax will consist of the operation of any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, hot tub facility, or suntan
facility, race track or other facility used for gambling, or store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; (vii) No part of Biovaxs business activities will include the rental to
others of residential rental property (the term residential rental property is defined in Section 168(e)(2)(A) of the Code as meaning any building or structure if eighty percent or more of the gross rental income from such building
or structure for the taxable year is rental income from dwelling units); (viii) The predominant trade or business of Biovax will not include the development or holding of intangibles for sale or license, as provided under
Section 1.45D-1(d)(5)(iii) of the Regulations; (ix) Farming (within the meaning of Section 2032A(e)(5)(A) or (B) of the Code) will not be an activity of Biovax; (x) Biovax will generate revenues by the date of April 25,
2009; (xi) Biovax shall not discontinue conducting business, shall not materially change the nature of its business, and shall not materially change the manner in which its business activities are conducted, other than changes in the nature of
its business or the manner in which it conducts its business that do not cause the making of the Loan by the Lender to cease to
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-41



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

April 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):



| | constitute a qualified low-income community investment as such term is used in Section 45D of the Code (as determined by the Lender in its good faith judgment
and based upon the advice of counsel); (xii) Biovax will not be a bank, credit union or other financial institution; (xiii) Biovax will not maintain a qualified low-income building under Section 42 of the Code; (xiv) Biovax will
not become a single-member entity treated as disregarded as separate from its owner for federal income tax purposes, nor be liquidated or merged into another entity without the written consent of Telesis CDE II, LLC; and (xv) Biovax and Biovest
will operate consistently with the Asset Purchase Agreement between Biovax and the Company, and will not amend such agreement without prior written consent of Telesis CDE II, LLC. An example of an event that would not cause a recapture is changes in
the Internal Revenue Code that results in such recapture. The total indemnification amount could be $4.7 million (representing 39% of the $12.0 million qualified investment). However, in accordance with Financial Interpretation 45 Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, the conditions and events that could result in recapture are within the control of Biovax. Therefore, this potential liability is not
reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company, Accentia and certain directors of the Company and Accentia entered into a guarantee arrangement with the CDE for the debt service of
Biovax. The Company has guaranteed 100% of the debt service while the directors of the Company and Accentia have guaranteed up to $6.0 million of the debt service. In addition, Accentia has partially guaranteed debt service with limitations
established at no greater than $60,000 each year the instrument is outstanding. The Company issued warrants to purchase 1.0 million shares of common stock to the officers and directors as compensation for their guarantees. The guarantees were
treated in a manner similar to contributed service and their fair value of $460,000 was charged to expense upon issuance. The Company also indemnified the guarantors from any claims of any kind to the extent that the guarantors are called upon to
pledge funds, assets or collateral in connection with the guarantee being executed.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Various legal and accounting fees of $108,000 paid directly by Biovax and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded as a reduction to
additional paid-in capital. Various legal and accounting fees of $170,000 paid by entities in which the Company has a variable interest and involved in structuring this transaction (the Fund and the CDE) were recorded as a reduction to
non-controlling interests in variable interest entities on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Professional fees of $360,000 involved in the continuing management of this transaction were recorded as a prepaid expense and will be
amortized over a period of seven and one half years, representing the duration of both convertible notes issued by the Fund and Biovax.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Various legal and accounting fees of $108,000 paid directly by the Company and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded as a reduction to
additional paid-in capital. Various legal and accounting fees of $170,000 paid by entities in which the Company has a variable interest and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded as a reduction to non-controlling interests in
variable interest entities on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Professional fees of $360,000 involved in the continuing management of this transaction were recorded as a prepaid expense and will be amortized over a period of seven and
one half years, representing the duration of both convertible notes issued by the Fund and Biovax, Inc.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-42



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

December 2006 NMTC
Transaction4:

On December 8, 2006, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, AutovaxID, Inc. (AutovaxID) closed a second NMTC financing
transaction (Transaction II). The following parties were involved in Transaction II: AutovaxID, Accentia, Biolender II, LLC (Biolender II), St. Louis New Market Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (CDE II), St. Louis
Development Corp., AutovaxID Investment LLC (Fund II), U.S. Bancorp, and Laurus.

On December 8, 2006, Accentia loaned to the
Company $3.1 million pursuant to a Secured Promissory Note (the Accentia Note). Under the terms of the Accentia Note, interest accrues at a rate equal to prime rate, and is convertible, at Accentias option, to shares of the
Companys common stock at a conversion price of $0.32 per share. Upon closing of Transaction II, the Company repaid Accentia $1.1 million. The remaining $2.0 million of principal and all accrued and unpaid interest is included in notes payable,
related parties in the accompanying September 30, 2008 consolidated balance sheet, and is due upon 30 days advance written notice by Accentia.

In contemplation of Transaction II, Biovest formed Biolender II as a Delaware limited liability company. On December 8, 2006, $2.5 million was
released from the restricted account created under the Laurus Note. The release of these funds was contingent upon their use in Transaction II. These funds, together with the amount loaned to Biovest under the Accentia Note funded the purchase of a
100% equity interest in Biolender II for the benefit of the Company. The Companys entire equity interest of $5.6 million in Biolender II has been pledged to Laurus as collateral to secure the Laurus Note.

In contemplation of Transaction II, Fund II was established. U.S. Bancorp invested $2.4 million for a 100% equity interest in Fund II. Additionally,
Biolender II and Fund II entered into a Loan and Security Agreement pursuant to which Biolender II made a loan to Fund II in the principal amount of $5.6 million (the Leverage Loan), evidenced by a promissory note dated December 8,
2006 payable from Fund II to Biolender II (the Leverage Note). The Leverage Note becomes due on June 9, 2014, and bears an interest rate of 8%, non-compounding. Payment of interest is due annually on the first calendar day of each
year through maturity. The outstanding principal amount on the Leverage Loan and any unpaid interest is due on maturity in cash.

The proceeds
received by Fund II from U.S. Bancorp and Biolender II were used to make a contemporaneous 99.99% equity investment in CDE II. The $8.0 million investment by Fund II to CDE II constituted a qualified equity investment (QEI) under the New
Markets Tax Credit Program authorized by Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, resulting in $3.12 million in tax credits which were allocated to U.S. Bancorp. All of Fund II interest in CDE II has been pledged to
Biolender II as collateral for the Leverage Loan.

CDE II is a Community Development Entity that is certified through the U.S. Treasury
Department to make QLICI, and is managed and partially owned (0.01%) by St. Louis Development Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation organized in Missouri. St. Louis Development Corporation paid $1,000 in consideration for its 0.01% interest in
CDE II. CDE II, upon receipt of its equity funding, contemporaneously issued a QLICI to AutovaxID, evidenced by a $7.7 million subordinated promissory note dated as of December 8, 2006 which matures on December 8, 2036 (the CDE
II Loan). Pursuant to a call right, for a period of six months starting on December 8, 2013, the CDE will have the right to call for the repayment of the CDE II Loan in the amount of $5.7 million, in full satisfaction of the principal on
the CDE II Loan. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the CDE II Loan accrues at the rate of 5.82% per annum, non-compounding and is payable in arrears on an annual basis having commenced on January 2, 2007 and continuing until
maturity. The CDE II Loan is guaranteed in full by the Company and also guaranteed up to an amount of $4.5 million by officers and directors of Accentia. The Company issued warrants to





|4 | In July 2010, the Company and certain of its affiliates entered into an agreement (the St. Louis Restructuring Agreement) with St. Louis
Development Corporation and Saint Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (collectively SLDC), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The St. Louis Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all
agreements and obligations of all parties pursuant to Transaction II, in consideration of retention by SLDC of an unsecured claim in the Companys Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $160,000 along with a settlement payment in the amount of
$62,000 to defray certain legal and administrative expenses incurred by SLDC. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, its Guaranty, the Guaranty by its parent, Accentia, and all of its subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all
other obligations to all parties to Transaction II will be terminated.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-43



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

December 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):

purchase 2.6 million shares of common stock to these officers and directors as compensation for their guarantees. The guarantees were treated in a
manner similar to contributed service and their fair value of $1.4 million was charged to expense upon issuance. The Company also indemnified the guarantors from any claims of any kind to the extent that the guarantors are called upon to pledge
funds, assets or collateral in connection with the guarantee being executed.

AutovaxID used the proceeds from the $7.7 million promissory
note to pay the Company $6.1 million pursuant to an Asset Purchase and License Agreement dated December 8, 2006 and described further below. The remaining $1.6 million was used to cover ongoing operational expenses of AutovaxID.

The transaction was structured so that, on June 9, 2014, AutovaxID will have paid approximately $9.1 million in principal and interest payments to
CDE II. The operating agreement of CDE II stipulates that any distributable cash received shall be distributed to Fund II in proportion to the respective percentage interest Fund II has in CDE II in an amount sufficient to fully pay the Fund II note
payable to Biolender II. On June 9, 2014, Fund II will have paid approximately $9.0 million in principal and interest payments to Biolender II (assuming CDE II exercises its right to call the CDE II loan for $5.7 million on June 9, 2014).
At maturity then, total equity of the Fund is approximated to be $100,000, resulting from the difference of $9.1 million in principal and interest payments received less $9.0M in principal and interest paid over the 7.5 year term of the notes.

Biolender II and US Bancorp entered into a put option wherein US Bancorp will have the right to put its investment in Fund II to the Company
near the maturity of the instruments at a price of $120,000. Management has concluded that the fair value of US Bancorps investment in Fund II at maturity of both notes (approximately $100,000) would be less than the $120,000 US Bancorp would
receive upon exercise of the put option and thus it is managements expectation that this option will be exercised. Thus, prior to maturity of both notes, it is anticipated that the Fund will be 100% owned by Biolender II. The Company accounted
for this option as a derivative liability that requires recognition at fair value. The Company utilized a probability-based, discounted cash flow approach to value the put. Accordingly, the valuation technique provided for the recognition of the
full put amount ($120,000) at the present value of its cash flows, using market interest rates that would likely be considered by market participants trading similar instruments.

Salient terms and conditions of Transaction II are as follows:



| |  |  | Under a License and Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, Biovest granted a non-exclusive license to the intellectual property
enabling AutovaxID to manufacture and sell automated cell culture instruments in the United States, Canada and Mexico (the License), which license became exclusive upon the occupancy by AutovaxID of a space located at 1031 Macklind
Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri (the New Plant) in June 2007. As full purchase price for the License and related business opportunity, AutovaxID paid Biovest $5.6 million. Biovest also agreed to sell AutovaxID certain equipment upon the
occupancy by AutovaxID of the New Plant for the fair market value of $0.5 million.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The CDE II Loan is secured by second lien on all assets of AutovaxID for the benefit of CDE II pursuant to a Second-Lien Security Agreement between
AutovaxID and CDE II dated as of December 8, 2006. Laurus has a senior lien on the assets of AutovaxID through the security agreement from the Company to Laurus, which AutovaxID joined by way of a Joinder Agreement.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | AutovaxID does not have the right to prepay the CDE Loan prior to June 8, 2014. AutovaxID does have the right to prepay the CDE Loan after this
date, provided that (i) it prepays the entire CDE Loan amount, (ii) the CDE consents to such prepayment and USBancorp and the managing member of the CDE agree on the reinvestment of such proceeds in an alternative investment that would
qualify as a QLICI and (iii) AutovaxID or the Individual Guarantors (as defined below) under the Tax Credit and Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement pay to USBancorp the recapture amount so specified is such agreement.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | All indebtedness owed by AutovaxID and its subsidiaries to CDE II, including its right to receive payments of principal and interest under the CDE II
Loan, is expressly subordinate to the extent set forth under the Telesis Subordination Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006 entered into by Laurus, CDE II, USBancorp, AutovaxID and the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-44



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

December 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):



| |  |  | The tax credits arising from this transaction were fully assigned to US Bancorp. AutovaxID has entered into an indemnification agreement directly with
US Bancorp that provides for indemnification in the event of tax credit recapture from events caused by AutovaxID. AutovaxID is contractually required to maintain the following covenants to avoid tax credit recapture: (i) AutovaxID shall
maintain its status as a qualified active low-income business; (ii) At least fifty percent of the use of the tangible property of the AutovaxID (whether owned or leased) will be within the low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e)
of the U.S. Tax Code; (iii) At least fifty percent of the services performed for AutovaxID by its employees will be within low-income community as defined by Section 45D(e) of the U.S. Tax Code; (iv) Less than five percent of the
average of the unadjusted bases of the property of AutovaxID will be attributable to collectibles (as defined in Section 408(m)(2) of the Code, and which includes any work of art; any rug or antique; any metal or gem; any stamp or coin; and any
alcoholic beverage) other than collectibles that are held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business; (v) Less than five percent of the average of the unadjusted bases of the property of AutovaxID will be
attributable to nonqualified financial property (as defined in Section 1397C(e) of the Code and in Section 1.45D-1(d)(4)(i)(E) of the Regulations, and which includes debt, stock, partnership interests, options, futures contracts, forward
contracts, warrants, notional principal contracts, annuities and other similar property); (vi) No part of the business activities of AutovaxID will consist of the operation of any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor,
hot tub facility, or suntan facility, race track or other facility used for gambling, or store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises; (vii) No part of AutovaxIDs business
activities will include the rental to others of residential rental property (the term residential rental property is defined in Section 168(e)(2)(A) of the Code as meaning any building or structure if eighty percent or more of the
gross rental income from such building or structure for the taxable year is rental income from dwelling units); (viii) The predominant trade or business of AutovaxID will not include the development or holding of intangibles for sale or
license, as provided under Section 1.45D-1(d)(5)(iii) of the Regulations; (ix) Farming (within the meaning of Section 2032A(e)(5)(A) or (B) of the Code) will not be an activity of AutovaxID; (x) AutovaxID will generate
revenues by the date of December 8, 2009; (xi)AutovaxID shall not discontinue conducting business, shall not materially change the nature of its business, and shall not materially change the manner in which its business activities are
conducted, other than changes in the nature of its business or the manner in which it conducts its business that do not cause the making of the Loan by the Lender to cease to constitute a qualified low-income community investment as such
term is used in Section 45D of the Code (as determined by the Lender in its good faith judgment and based upon the advice of counsel); (xii) AutovaxID will not be a bank, credit union or other financial institution; (xiii) AutovaxID
will not maintain a qualified low-income building under Section 42 of the Code; (xiv) AutovaxID will not become a single-member entity treated as disregarded as separate from its owner for federal income tax purposes, nor be liquidated or
merged into another entity without the written consent of CDE II; and (xv) AutovaxID and Biovest will operate consistently with the License between AutovaxID and Biovest, and will not amend such agreement without prior written consent of CDE
II. An example of an event that would not cause a recapture is changes in the Internal Revenue Code that results in such recapture. The total indemnification amount could be $3.12 million (representing 39% of the $8.0 million qualified investment).
However, in accordance with Financial Interpretation 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, the conditions and events that could result in recapture are
within AutovaxIDs control. Therefore, this potential liability is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Under a Reimbursement Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, Biovest agreed to reimburse St. Louis Development Corp (the 0.01% and managing
member of CDE II) up to $32,000 annually for expenses incurred by St. Louis Development Corp in connection with its management of CDE II.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-45



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



21. New Market Tax Credit transactions (contd)

December 2006 NMTC Transaction (contd):



| |  |  | Various legal, accounting, and professional fees of $433,000 paid directly by the Company and AutovaxID and involved in structuring this transaction
were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. Various legal and accounting fees of $180,000 paid by entities in which the Company has a variable interest (CDE II, and Fund II) and involved in structuring this transaction were recorded
as a reduction to non-controlling interests in variable interest entities on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Professional fees of $115,000 involved in the continuing management of this transaction were recorded as a prepaid expense
and will be amortized over a period of seven and one half years, representing the duration of the note issued by Fund II and payable to Biolender II.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

22. Variable interest entities

Accounting for the NMTC financing arrangement:

The Company evaluated the structure of the NMTC financing arrangements and entities so involved under the context of ASC 810. This guidance provides a
framework for determining whether certain entities should be consolidated (irrespective of equity ownership) based upon a variable interests model. This model determines the control and consolidation based upon potential variability in gains and
losses of the entity being evaluated for consolidation. Generally, a variable interest holder that absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses, if they occur, receives a majority of the entitys expected residual return, if they
occur, or both is identified as the primary beneficiary for consolidation purposes.

The Company concluded that Biolender, Biovax Investment,
LLC, Telesis CDE Two, LLC, Biolender II, Autovax Investment, LLC and St. Louis New Market Tax Credit Fund II, LLC met the definition of variable interest entity. However, for the Company to be required to apply the provisions of the Interpretation,
it must have a variable interest in the entity. Variable interests in a variable interest entity are contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in an entity that change with changes in the value of the net assets of the entity. The following
tables illustrate the variable interests have been identified in each of the entities considered by the Company and the related holder:

New
Market Tax Credit Transaction I:



|                                |  |                                   |  |                                          |  |                                        
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Variable Interest Holder        |  | Variable Interests
Biolender, LLC |  | Variable Interests BiovaxInvestment,
LLC |  | Variable Interests
Telesis CDE Two, LLC
|Biovest and its Related Parties |  | Controlling interest              |  | Senior beneficial interest               |  | Senior beneficial interest             
|                                |  |                                   | 
|                                |  | Primary beneficiary               |  | Guaranty Agreement                       |  | Guarantee Agreement                    
|                                |  |                                   | 
|                                |  |                                   |  | Indemnification Agreement                |  |                                        
|                                |  |                                   | 
|                                |  |                                   |  | Put (VIE Equity)                         |  |                                        
|                                |  |                                   | 
|                                |  |                                   |  | Call (VIE Equity)                        |  |                                        
|                                |  |                                   | 
|Biovax Investment, LLC          |  |                                   |  |                                          |  | VIE Equity (99.9%)                     
|                                |  |                                   | 
|US Bancorp                      |  |                                   |  | VIE Equity (99.9%)                       |  | Tax Credit Rights                      
|                                |  |                                   | 
|Biovax Investment Corp.         |  |                                   |  | VIE Equity (0.01%)                       |  |                                        
|                                |  |                                   | 
|Telesis CDE, Corp               |  |                                   |  |                                          |  | VIE Equity (0.01%)                     



F-46



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



22. Variable interest entities (contd)

Accounting for the NMTC financing arrangement (contd):

New Market Tax Credit Transaction II:



|                                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |  |                                              
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Variable Interest Holder          |  | Variable Interest
Biolender II, LLC |  | Variable Interests AutovaxIDInvestment,
LLC |  | Variable Interests St. Louis
NMTCFund II, LLC
|Biovest and its Related Parties   |  | Controlling interest                |  | Senior beneficial interest                  |  | Senior beneficial interest                   
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|                                  |  | Primary beneficiary                 |  | Guaranty Agreement                          |  | Guarantee Agreement                          
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|                                  |  |                                     |  | Indemnification Agreement                   |  |                                              
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|                                  |  |                                     |  | Put (VIE Equity)                            |  |                                              
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|                                  |  |                                     |  | Call (VIE Equity)                           |  |                                              
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|AutovaxID Investment, LLC         |  |                                     |  |                                             |  | VIE Equity (99.9%)                           
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|US Bancorp                        |  |                                     |  | VIE Equity (100%)                           |  | Tax Credit Rights                            
|                                  |  |                                     | 
|St. Louis Development Corporation |  |                                     |  |                                             |  | VIE Equity (0.01%)                           

The above table illustrates the
weight of the variable interests that are held by the Company. In addition, in performing quantitative valuation, the Company afforded significant weight to the guarantee agreements, indemnifications and put features, the preponderance of which
limit the equity investors risk of loss on the venture. In evaluating both qualitative and quantitative considerations, the Company concluded that its variable interests in the entity absorb most of the variable interest entities losses
and should, therefore, consolidate the entities under the scope of ASC 810.

Assets of $20.9 million and liabilities of $16.9 million of the
variable interest entities identified above are limited to the instruments pertaining to the NMTC financing arrangements. In accordance with consolidation principles, these assets and liabilities are eliminated in consolidation leaving the
non-controlling interests of Biolender, Telesis CDE Two, LLC, Biovax Investment, LLC, Biolender II, AutovaxID Investment, LLC, and St. Louis NMTC Fund II, LLC, reflected on the Companys September 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheet as
non-controlling interests in variable interest entities.

The Companys $455,000 non-controlling interest in (income)/losses from
variable interest entities on it consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2009 consists of the following:



|                            |  |   |          |  
|--------------------------- |  | - | -------- | -
|Variable Interest Entity    |  |   |         
|Biovax Investment LLC       |  | $ | 446,000  |  
|Telesis CDE Two, LLC        |  |   | (6,000   | )
|AutovaxID Investment, LLC   |  |   | 448,000  |  
|St. Louis NMTC Fund II, LLC |  |   | (433,000 | )
|                            |  |   |          |  
|                            |  | $ | 455,000  |  
|                            |  |   |          |  



F-47



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



23. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)



|               |  |                               |            |   |           |   |            |           |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ---------- | - | --------- | - | ---------- | --------- |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|               |  | Year Ended September 30, 2009 |           
|               |  | Quarter 1                     |            |   | Quarter 2 |   |            | Quarter 3 |  |   | Quarter 4  |  
|Net sales      |  | $                             | 658,000    |   |           | $ | 986,000    |           |  | $ | 868,000    |   |  | $ | 1,144,000  |  
|Gross profit   |  |                               | 56,000     |   |           |   | 312,000    |           |  |   | 293,000    |   |  |   | 543,000    |  
|Net loss       |  |                               | (3,115,000 | ) |           |   | (2,709,000 | )         |  |   | (7,309,000 | ) |  |   | (1,521,000 | )
|Loss per share |  | $                             | (0.03      | ) |           | $ | (0.03      | )         |  | $ | (0.07      | ) |  | $ | (0.02      | )
|               | 
|               |  | Year Ended September 30, 2008 |           
|               |  | Quarter 1                     |            |   | Quarter 2 |   |            | Quarter 3 |  |   | Quarter 4  |  
|Net sales      |  | $                             | 1,259,000  |   |           | $ | 1,556,000  |           |  | $ | 1,075,000  |   |  | $ | 1,385,000  |  
|Gross profit   |  |                               | 576,000    |   |           |   | 748,000    |           |  |   | 330,000    |   |  |   | 657,000    |  
|Net loss       |  |                               | (3,734,000 | ) |           |   | (4,399,000 | )         |  |   | (3,351,000 | ) |  |   | (9,156,000 | )
|Loss per share |  | $                             | (0.04      | ) |           | $ | (0.05      | )         |  | $ | (0.04      | ) |  | $ | (0.08      | )

24. Commitments and contingencies

Legal proceedings:

On
August 4, 2008, the Company was served with a summons and complaint filed in California Superior Court on behalf of Clinstar LLC for breach of contract for non-payment of certain fees for clinical trial studies and pass-through expenses in the
amount of $385,000. The Company intends to seek to dismiss this litigation and plan to defend these claims vigorously. Upon the filing of the Companys Chapter 11 petition on November 10, 2008, this litigation was automatically stayed
pursuant to provisions of federal bankruptcy law.

On November 10, 2008, the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company will operate its business as a debtor in possession in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court.

Except for the foregoing, we are not party to any material legal proceedings, and management is not aware of any threatened
legal proceedings that could cause a material adverse impact on our business, assets, or results of operations.

Further, from time to time we
are subject to various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, some of which are covered by insurance.

Employment agreements:

The Company has employment agreements with certain employees, which extend from 24 to 36 months. These agreements provide for base levels
of compensation and separation benefits. Future minimum payments under these employment agreements at September 30, 2009 are approximately $0.5 million of which $0.3 million, and $0.2 million become due in the years ending September 30,
2011, and 2010 respectively. In 2009, four employees agreements terminated normally.

Facility leases:

The Company leases equipment and office and manufacturing space pursuant to several non-cancelable operating leases. The Company leases approximately
33,000 square feet in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is used for offices, a laboratory, manufacturing, warehousing areas to support the production of perfusion cell culture equipment and contract cell culture services. This facility lease agreement
has expired and the Company continues to occupy this facility on a month to month basis. Rent expense pertaining to this lease was $0.3 million per year for both the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

The Company anticipates that its facilities will meet its needs during fiscal 2010. The Company anticipates that as its development of BiovaxID advances
and as the Company prepares for the future commercialization of its products, its facilities requirements will increase.



F-48



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



24. Commitments and contingencies (contd)

Cooperative Research and Development Agreement:

In September 2001, the Company entered into a definitive CRADA with the NCI for the development and ultimate commercialization of patient-specific
vaccines for the treatment of non-Hodgkins low-grade follicular lymphoma. The terms of the CRADA, as amended, included, among other things, a requirement to pay $0.5 million quarterly to NCI for expenses incurred in connection with the ongoing
Phase 3 clinical trials. Since the transfer to Biovest of the investigational new drug application for development of this vaccine, which occurred in April 2004, these payments to NCI have been reduced to a small fraction of this original obligation
(approximately $0.2 million per year). On September 25, 2006, the Company provided written notice to the NCI in accordance with the terms of the CRADA to terminate the CRADA at the end of the sixty day notice period. Under the terms of the
CRADA, the Company is obligated to continue to provide vaccine to the NCI at no charge for purposes of the NCIs studies that are within the scope of the CRADA if the Company were to abandon work on the vaccine. As the Company is actively
developing the vaccine for commercialization and intends to do so to its completion, no estimated costs have been accrued as of September 30, 2009.

Food and Drug Administration:

The FDA
has extensive regulatory authority over biopharmaceutical products (drugs and biological products), manufacturing protocols and procedures and the facilities in which mammalian proteins will be manufactured. Any new bioproduct intended for use in
humans (including, to a somewhat lesser degree, in vivo biodiagnostic products), is subject to rigorous testing requirements imposed by the FDA with respect to product efficacy and safety, possible toxicity and side effects. FDA approval for the use
of new bioproducts (which can never be assured) requires several rounds of extensive preclinical testing and clinical investigations conducted by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company prior to sale and use of the product. At each stage, the
approvals granted by the FDA include the manufacturing process utilized to produce the product. Accordingly, the Companys cell culture systems used for the production of therapeutic or biotherapeutic products are subject to significant
regulation by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended (the FD&C Act).

Product liability:

The contract production services for therapeutic products offered exposes an inherent risk of liability as the proteins or other substances
manufactured, at the request and to the specifications of customers, could foreseeably cause adverse effects. The Company obtains agreements from contract production customers indemnifying and defending the Company from any potential liability
arising from such risk. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in obtaining such agreements in the future or that such indemnification agreements will adequately protect the Company against potential claims relating
to such contract production services. The Company may also be exposed to potential product liability claims by users of its products. A successful partial or completely uninsured claim against the Company could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys operations.

Guarantee Indemnifications:

Under the terms of the January and March Pulaski Bank notes payable, several board members and affiliates issued personal guarantees. The Company agreed
to indemnify and hold harmless each guarantor should their guarantees be called by Pulaski Bank by agreeing to compensate each affected guarantor by an issuance of restricted common stock equal to 700% of the amount of their guarantee. The
stock will be issued using a pre-determined value of $1.10 per share. On December 29, 2008, Pulaski Bank called its guaranty resulting in an aggregate payment of $1.0 million by the guarantors. As a result of their indemnification
agreements, the Pulaski Bank guarantors are expected to assert an unsecured claim for the value of approximately 6.4 million shares of the Companys common.

Under the terms of the Southwest Bank note payable issued June 26, 2007, an officer of Biovest issued a personal guarantee. The Company agreed to
indemnify and hold harmless the guarantor should the guarantee be called by Southwest Bank by agreeing to compensate each affected guarantor by an issuance of restricted common stock equal to 700% of the amount of their guarantee. The stock will be
issued using a pre-determined value of $1.10 per share. In January 2009, Southwest Bank called its guaranty resulting in an aggregate payment of $0.2 million by the guarantor. As a result of his indemnification agreement, the Southwest Bank
guarantor is expected to assert an unsecured claim for the value of approximately 1.3 million shares of the Companys common stock.



F-49



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



24. Commitments and contingencies (contd)

Royalty agreements:

Pursuant to the
royalty agreement dated October 31, 2006, as amended, the Company is required to pay to Accentia a 15.5% royalty on net sales from biologics products.

On April 17, 2007, the Company executed an amendment agreement (the Amendment) with its senior lender, Laurus, to defer payments of
principal on its $7.8 million loan. As consideration for the forbearance the Company granted to Laurus a non-cancelable royalty equal to three percent of world-wide net sales of AutovaxID instruments for a period of five years commencing on
May 31, 2007. Under the terms of the royalty agreement the Companys royalty payments to Laurus are required to aggregate to a minimum of $8.0 million with $0.5 million of the minimum royalty having been paid on December 10, 2007 and
the balance (if any), less actual royalties paid, being due on May 31, 2012.

On October 30, 2007, December 10, 2007, and again
on May 30, 2008 the Company completed and/or modified financing transactions with the Valens Funds, both of which are subsidiary companies of Laurus. Pursuant to these transactions, the Valens Funds were granted an aggregate 19.5% royalty
interest in the worldwide net commercial sales of the Companys biologic products.

Stanford University agreement:

In September 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Stanford University (Stanford) allowing worldwide rights to use two proprietary
hybridoma cell lines that are used in the production of BiovaxID. Under the agreement with Stanford, the Company is obligated to pay an annual maintenance fee of $10,000. The agreement also provides that the Company will pay Stanford $100,000 within
one year following FDA approval of BiovaxID or five years following the agreement date (whichever occurs first), and following approval the Company is required to pay Stanford a running royalty of the higher of $50.00 per patient or 0.05% of
revenues received by the Company for each BiovaxID patient treated using this cell line. This running royalty will be creditable against the yearly maintenance fee. The Companys agreement with Stanford obligates us to diligently develop,
manufacture, market, and sell BiovaxID and to provide progress reports to Stanford regarding these activities. The Company can terminate this agreement at any time upon 30 days prior written notice, and Stanford can terminate the agreement
upon a breach of the agreement by us that remains uncured for 30 days after written notice of the breach from Stanford.

Distribution
agreement:

On June 1, 2007 the Company entered into a non-exclusive distribution agreement with VWR, to distribute the AutovaxID
automated cell culture device in North America. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company is obligated to pay to VWR 25% of net sales revenue generated from the sales and marketing efforts of VWR on AutovaxID cell culture systems and disposable
cultureware used in conjunction with the AutovaxID system. The initial term of this agreement is for 24 months and can be terminated at any time by either party upon 180 days prior written notice. The Company has not incurred any distribution
expense to date related to this agreement. Subsequent to the period of this report, effective as of March 21, 2010, the Company terminated the non-exclusive distribution agreement.

Sublicense agreement with related party:

On January 16, 2008, the Company entered into a sublicense agreement (the Sublicense Agreement) with Revimmune under which the Company
was granted the exclusive worldwide rights to Revimmune, a patent-pending pharmaceutical treatment in late-stage development for the treatment of and prevention of transplant rejection including rejection following a bone marrow transplant.



F-50



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



24. Commitments and contingencies (contd)

Sublicense agreement with related party (contd):

The material terms and conditions of the Sublicense Agreement are as follows:



| |  |  | The Company is obligated to pay to Revimmune a royalty of 6% on net sales, and in the event of a sublicense by the Company, to pay 20% of sublicense
consideration received. The Company did not pay an upfront fee in connection with the Sublicense but upon the approval of the sublicensed treatment in the U.S. for each sublicensed indication, the Company is required to issue to Revimmune vested
warrants to purchase 2.0 million shares of the Companys common stock. Each such warrant which will be granted at the approval of each successive Sublicensed Product will have an exercise price of $1.10 per share or, at the discretion of
Company, at a price equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant of such warrant.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company assumed certain obligations under Revimmunes license with Johns Hopkins University related to the sublicensed technology, including
the payment of all royalty obligations due Johns Hopkins University for the sublicensed products which includes a 4.0% royalty on licensed products and services and a 20.0% royalty on sublicense consideration.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company will be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for the development, clinical trial(s), promotion, marketing, sales and
commercialization of the sublicensed products.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In the event of any petition in bankruptcy filed by or with respect to the Company, or any pledge or grant of a lien by the Company of the sublicensed
rights, the Sublicense Agreement shall terminate and the Sublicensed Rights shall revert to Revimmune.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Revimmune is affiliated with a director of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

25. Subsequent Events

Grant of Orphan Drug Designation for
BiovaxID®:

On October 28, 2009, the FDA granted Orphan Drug designation to
BiovaxID®. With FDA Orphan Drug designation, the Company has a seven-year period of market exclusivity for
BiovaxID upon approval, thereby offering competitive protection from similar drugs of the same class. Orphan Drug designation also provides the Company with eligibility to receive potential tax credit benefits, potential grant funding for research
and development and significantly reduced filing fees for marketing applications.

Termination of Distribution Agreement:

Effective March 21, 2010, the Company terminated its non-exclusive distribution agreement with VWR for the sale of AutovaxID instruments.

Appointment of Certain Directors:

On
June 23, 2010, Edmund C. King, CPA was appointed to the Board to serve as a Director to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Robert Weiss, the Companys designated Financial Expert/Director, in November 2008. Mr. King
began to serve as a Director commencing on June 23, 2010 and will continue to serve as a Director for the remainder of the term of that Director position and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. The Board has determined that
Mr. King is to serve as the designated Financial Expert of the Board and meets the applicable requirements of independence so as to allow the Company to comply, as and when necessary, with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.



F-51



---

##### Table of Contents

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008



25. Subsequent Events (contd)

NMTC I and II Compromises:

In July 2010,
the Company and certain affiliates entered into an agreement (the Worcester Restructuring Agreement) with Telesis CDE Corporation and Telesis CDE Two, LLC (collectively, Telesis), contingent upon submission to and approval by the
Bankruptcy Court. The Worcester Restructuring Agreement effectively terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties pursuant to Transaction I, (see Item 21 for further discussion of this transaction) in consideration of retention by Telesis
of an unsecured claim in the Companys Chapter 11 proceeding in the amount of $300,000 along with a settlement payment in the amount of $85,000 to defray certain legal and administrative expenses incurred by Telesis. Upon approval by the
Bankruptcy Court, the Guaranty of the Company, the Guaranty by the Companys parent, Accentia, and all subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all other obligations of the Company and all parties to Transaction I will be
terminated.

In July 2010, the Company and certain affiliates entered into an agreement (the St. Louis Restructuring Agreement) with
St. Louis Development Corporation and Saint Louis New Markets Tax Credit Fund II, LLC (collectively, SLDC), contingent upon submission to and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The St. Louis Restructuring Agreement effectively
terminates all agreements and obligations of all parties pursuant to Transaction II, (see Item 21 for further discussion of this transaction) in consideration of retention by SLDC of an unsecured claim in the Companys Chapter 11 proceeding in
the amount of $160,000 along with a settlement payment in the amount of $62,000 to defray certain legal and administrative expenses incurred by SLDC. Upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, the Guaranty of the Company, the Guaranty by the
Companys parent, Accentia, and all subsidiary Guaranties from affiliates and third parties and all other obligations of the Company and all parties to Transaction II will be terminated.

Filing of Plan of Reorganization

On
May 14, 2010, the Company filed its Joint Plan of Reorganization (the Plan), and on July 2, 2010, the Company filed its Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court will schedule a hearing on the
Disclosure Statement, anticipated to take place in early August 2010.



F-52