alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

      ( print page 46234)    
                    By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 29, 2009, (74 FR 19599), Norac Inc., 405 S. Motor Avenue, P.O. Box 577, Azusa, California 91702-3232, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Methamphetamine (1105), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use in product development and for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 USC 823(a) and determined that the registration of Norac, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Norac, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 USC 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: August 21, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

 Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-21532 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# Azerbaijan

264 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 28, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 28, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 27, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 27, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Azerbaijani President Aliyev	  September 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 25, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 25, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Azerbaijani President Aliyev	  September 19, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Call for End of Hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 19, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Statement on Humanitarian Assistance to Nagorno-Karabakh	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023Washington, D.C.  

previous page1…45678…27next page

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.410 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 8, 2009.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

For Further Information Contact: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: August 28, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-21231 Filed 8-31-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The LEGISLATIVE AUDITING COMMITTEE OF the LEGISLATURE, Petitioner, v. Robert N. BUSSEY, Respondent.

No. 46133.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 3, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 298 So.2d 219.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Sylvia CULLEN and Charles Cullen, her husband, Appellants, v. BIG DADDY’S LOUNGES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1978.

*840Monty Jay Tilles, Hollywood, for appellants.

Leland E. Stansell, Jr., South Miami, and Robert A. Glassman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., HENDRY, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs take this appeal from a summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendant in a slip and fall action. The record discloses that at the time of the granting of the summary judgment plaintiffs had not completed their discovery and the court had not ruled upon plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery.

In *Commercial Bank of Kendall*v. *Heiman,*322 So.2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), we held that:

> “. . . [I]t was premature for the trial court to award the defendant a summary judgment when the plaintiff, through no fault of its own, had not completed its discovery.”

The summary judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings which may include further motions for summary judgment by either side after all discovery is completed.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,562,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,724,431
<PP&E>                                         298,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,062,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          864,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,070
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,955,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,062,575
<SALES>                                         39,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,052,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (37,684)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (995,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (995,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (995,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
# C_2006086EN.01002802.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/28

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 January 2006 — Van Mannekus v Council

(Case T-280/03) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of dead-burned (sintered) magnesia originating in China - Amendment of anti-dumping measures previously imposed - Action for annulment - Objection as to admissibility)

(2006/C 86/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Van Mannekus & Co. BV (Schiedam, Netherlands) (represented by: H. Bleier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Marquardt, Agent, and by G. Berrisch, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf and K. Talaber Ricz, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Application for

annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 986/2003 of 5 June 2003 amending the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 360/2000 on imports of dead-burned (sintered) magnesia originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 2003 L 143, p. 5)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council.

| 3. | The Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.

1

---
### Exhibit B

Permission/Waiver

You have requested an aerial videography of your home by iDroneYour Home (IDYH). In order to do so, IDYH requires your written permission to enter your property in order to conduct an on-site survey of your property and it's surroundings; and to launch/fly an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) over your home and it's surroundings. This is absolutely necessary in order to conduct a safe flight. We will not proceed without written approval. IDYH will take every precaution to ensure that no damage occurs as a result of the flight. We reserve the right to cancel the flight at any time without penalty due to Force Majeure or Act of God. UAV damage can result from contact with any source such as landscaping, trees, utility poles and the house itself. While we pride ourselves on our professionalism and flying skill, there is always inherent danger in flight. A sudden and unexpected gust of wind could blow the UAV off its planned course. If the UAV contacts an object, it generally results in damage to the UAV. Minor property damage may
occur. IDYH accepts no responsibility for any damage incurred by your home or personal property as a result of the UAV flight of your home or property. You agree to hold harmless IDYH, it's owners and operators should any damage occur.
IDYH retains sole ownership of all video shot on or around your property. We NEVER sell our video to you or any third party; rather we sell our expertise and video editing services. All rights reserved by IDYH. We will issue you a license to display, upload and/or broadcast the final edited version by you, your real estate agent/agency or any other entity designated by you in writing. We will never display your address without your written approval.Our fees are based on the size of the property, it's location and the extent of aerial coverage requested

by you. Additional services such as increased length of video production, additional flying time, titling and editing will increase the project cost. Unless there is an error or omission on our part, the edit will be considered final and not subject to your prior approval or consent.

Subject Property Address:_____________________________________

Signed and Accepted by:______________________________________ Date: _______________
# C_2006011EN.01001301.xml

| 17.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4056 — Hochtief Airport/CDPQ/Budapest Airport)

(2006/C 11/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4056. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4056. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wallace R. ELLENDER, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12357.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 16, 1979.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 1979.

Bryan Miller and Johnie E. Branch, Jr., Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas L. Wright, Houma, for defendant-appellee.

Before SARTAIN, CHIASSON and EDWARDS, JJ.

SARTAIN, Judge.

For reasons assigned this date in *State v. Louisiana Through the Department of Highways,*No. 12,358, La.App., 371 So.2d 626, the judgment of the trial court is amended to reduce the value of the part taken from $10,000.00 per acre to $7500.00 per acre, with the proper acreage to be determined on remand, and to reduce the award for severance damages from the sum of $12,500.00 to the sum of $4445.12, less a credit of $2000.00 for each culvert placed by the State for Tra<?t 1- 7.

The assessment of costs is to await a final determination on the merits.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
exv10w25






Exhibit 10.25



 




    FIRST
    AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE



 



    ROSEVILLE PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a
    Minnesota corporation, as agent for Commers-Klodt, a Minnesota
    general partnership (“Landlord”) and INTERNATIONAL
    TECHNIDYNE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,
    (“Tenant”), entered into a Commercial Lease (Lease)
    dated September 26, 2003 for the premises located at
    2640-2652 Patton Road, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, consisting of
    approximately 35,040 square feet. This First Amendment
    shall be effective as of January 1, 2009.



 



    Both parties wish to amend this Lease as follows;



 


		
	    1.  	
    LEASE TERM




 



    Landlord and Tenant desire to hereby extend the Term of the
    Lease so that it will now terminate on December 31, 2013.
    Section 1.1 of the Lease shall remain in effect such that
    the first of two Renewal Terms, if exercised, shall follow the
    Term of the Lease terminating on December 31, 2013.



 


		
	    2.  	
    BASE RENT




 



    Base Rent shall be based upon $8.60 per square foot with 2%
    annual increases after the first year:



 


	 	 	 
	

    Months


	
 
	

    Monthly Base Rent



	 

	

    January 1,
    2009 — December 31, 2009


	
 
	
    $25,112.00 per month

	

    January 1, 2010 — December 31, 2010


	
 
	
    $25,614.00 per month

	

    January 1, 2011 — December 31, 2011


	
 
	
    $26,127.00 per month

	

    January 1, 2012 — December 31, 2012


	
 
	
    $26,649.00 per month

	

    January 1, 2013 — December 31, 2013


	
 
	
    $27,182.00 per month









 



    All other terms, conditions and obligations outlined in the
    Lease and subsequent Amendments remain in full force and effect.



 



    AS AGREED BY:



 


	 	 	 
	
    LESSOR:

    
	
 
	
LESSEE:


	
    ROSEVILLE PROPERTIES

	
 
	
    INTERNATIONAL TECHNIDYNE



	
    MANAGEMENT COMPANY as agent

	
 
	
    CORPORATION


	
    for Commers-Klodt
	
 
	
 


	 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	





    
Signature


	
 
	



    
Signature

	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    /s/  MARK
    E. RANCOME


    Name
    (print)


	
 
	
    /s/  LAWRENCE
    COHEN


    Name
    (print)

	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Vice
    President


    Title
    


	
 
	
    President


    Title

	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    6-22-08


    Date


	
 
	
    June 18,
    2008


    Date
§ 417.164 Effect of revocation of qualification on inclusion in employee's health benefit plans. When an HMO's qualification is revoked under § 417.163(d), the following rules apply: ( a ) The HMO may not seek inclusion in employees health benefits plans under subpart E of this part.
( b ) Inclusion of the HMO in an employer's health benefits plan— ( 1 ) Is disregarded in determining whether the employer is subject to the requirements of subpart E of this part; and
( 2 ) Does not constitute compliance with subpart E of this part by the employer.
[59 FR 49842, Sept. 30, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 27288, May 31, 1996]
Exhibit 10.724

NOVARTIS AG        WRITTEN CONSENT AND APPROVAL        Effective as of May 18, 2001

AMENDMENT TO GOVERNANCE AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, Section 2.04 (a)(iv) of that certain Governance Agreement dated as of November 20, 1994 between Chiron Corporation ("Chiron" or the
"Company") and Novartis AG, requires the approval of Novartis to change the size of the composition of any committee of the Board of Directors of Chiron;

WHEREAS,
the Stock Option Plan Administration Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors of Chiron currently is composed of two Management Directors on Chiron's Board,
Séan P. Lance and Lewis T. Williams, in accordance with Section 2.03(b)(v) of the Governance Agreement;

WHEREAS,
Dr. Williams has indicated that he will not stand for re-election as a Director at the Annual Stockholders Meeting in May, and will not continue to serve as a
member on the Committee;

WHEREAS,
Management of Chiron has recommended that it would be in the best interests of the Company to amend Section 2.03(b)(v) of the Governance Agreement to reduce the
number of members on the Committee from two to one;

NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 2.03(b)(v) of the Governance Agreement be amended to reduce the number of Management Directors who comprise the members of the
Committee from two (2) to one (1), until such time as the composition of the Committee is otherwise changed in a manner consistent with the Governance Agreement by the Board of Directors, with
such change to be effective as of May 18, 2001, subject to Novartis' concurrence;

RESOLVED
FURTHER, that Seán P. Lance, who currently serves as the second Management Director and a member of the Committee, continue to serve as the sole Management
Director member of the Committee until his successor is duly elected or qualified;

IN
CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, Novartis AG hereby approves the reduction in size of the members of the Stock Option Plan Administration Committee of Chiron's Board of Directors and
corresponding amendment of the Governance Agreement with Chiron, effective as of May 18, 2001.

| |  | NOVARTIS AG
| |  | -----------
| |  |            
| |  |            
| |  | By:        
| |  | Its:       
| |  |            
| |  |            
| |  | By:        
| |  | Its:       

---

QuickLinks
§ 412.125 Effect of change of ownership on payments under the prospective payment systems. When a hospital's ownership changes, as described in § 489.18 of this chapter, the following rules apply: ( a ) Payment for the operating and capital-related costs of inpatient hospital services for each patient, including outlier payments, as provided in § 412.112, and payments for hemophilia clotting factor costs under § 412.115(b), are made to the entity that is the legal owner on the date of discharge. Payments are not prorated between the buyer and seller. ( 1 ) The owner on the date of discharge is entitled to submit a bill for all inpatient hospital services furnished to a beneficiary regardless of when the beneficiary's coverage began or ended during a stay, or of how long the stay lasted.
( 2 ) Each bill submitted must include all information necessary for the intermediary to compute the payment amount, whether or not some of that information is attributable to a period during which a different party legally owned the hospital.
( b ) Other payments under § 412.113 and payments for bad debts as described in § 412.115(a), are made to each owner or operator of the hospital (buyer and seller) in accordance with the principles of reasonable cost reimbursement.
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 43449, Aug. 30, 1991]
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

217) ll-K-(I)-30 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 217 of 325 

P.1 
P.2 

A\ PI I/I— i \ c n 

II-K-(I)-30 

INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS ANALYSIS OVERVIEW OF EEA IMPACT 

STUDY. 

Prepared for Informal Analysis Working Group. 

August 15, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-30
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman’s Meeting with Israeli National Security Advisor-designate Dr. Eyal Hulata and Senior Foreign Policy Advisor Shimrit Meir

# 									Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman’s Meeting with Israeli National Security Advisor-designate Dr. Eyal Hulata and Senior Foreign Policy Advisor Shimrit Meir							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

August 3, 2021

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Israeli National Security Advisor-designate Dr. Eyal Hulata and Senior Foreign Policy Advisor Shimrit Meir to discuss the U.S.-Israel bilateral relationship and congratulate Hulata on his appointment. They discussed Israel’s security; strategic challenges, including Iran; and the need to take steps related to the Palestinian people that are critical to advancing freedom, security, and prosperity for all. They also discussed concerns regarding the attack on the Mercer Street vessel. Deputy Secretary Sherman emphasized the strong partnership between the United States and Israel, U.S. support for the normalization agreements between Israel and countries in the Arab and Muslim world, as well as the U.S. government’s unwavering support for Israel’s security.

 

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateIsraelOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsSecurity

Back to Top