alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No.1 to Lease Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2002



 EXHIBIT 10.61 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THAT LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GOLD POINTE C, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO LANDHOLD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS LANDLORD, AND HEALTH NET, INC, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, AS TENANT, DATED MARCH 5th, 2001, FOR THE PREMISES LOCATED AT 11971 FOUNDATION PLACE IN RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA. 
 Effective
November 22, 2002, the above described Lease Agreement shall be modified as follows: 
 The Basic Lease Information – Premises shall be
replaced in its entirety as follows: 
  

					
	 Premises:
	 	The Premises referred to in this Lease consist of approximately 141,151 rentable square feet on the first, second and third floors of the Building.
		
	 Tenant’s Proportionate Share:
	 	96.77%, based on a Building rentable area of approximately 145,869 square feet.
		
	 Lease Commencement Date:
	 	July 8, 2002
		
	 Lease Expiration Date:
	 	January 7, 2013
			
	 Base Rent:
	 	Months:	 	Monthly Base Rent
		 	07/08/02-01/07/03:	 	Free Rent and Building Operating Expenses.
		 	01/08/03-01/07/05:	 	$258,306.33
		 	01/08/05-01/07/07:	 	$265,363.88
		 	01/08/07-01/07/09:	 	$272,421.43
		 	01/08/09-01/07/11:	 	$279,478.98
		 	01/08/11-01/07/13:	 	$286,536.53

 All other terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment the day and year written below. 
  

			
	LANDLORD:
	
	 GOLD POINTE C, LLC,
 a California
limited liability Company

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael E. Diepenbrock
		 	 Michael E. Diepenbrock,
 Managing
Member


  
 TENANT: 
  
  

			
	 HEALTH NET, INC.
 A Delaware
Corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ Dennis Bell
		 	Dennis Bell
	Its:	 	Vice President
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 189

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Inez FUNDERBURK et al. v. MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR COMPANY et al.

No. 62310.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1978.

JOINT MOTION OF APPLICANTS AND RESPONDENTS TO DISMISS MATTER PENDING BEFORE THE COURT

ORDER

The * * * Motion to Dismiss having been considered:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter bearing Docket No. 62,310 on the docket of this Court entitled, “INEZ A. FUNDERBURK, ET AL VS. MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR COMPANY, ET AL”, 359 So.2d 620, be dismissed.
# C_2006106EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,59 % on 1 May 2006

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

4 May 2006

(2006/C 106/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2592 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4571 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3255 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5616 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,95 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5752 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,338 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 261,07 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8191 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4661 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,300 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6675 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6393 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4003 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7623 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9693 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9893 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 183,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6956 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0944 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2828 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 075,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,548 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,861 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,598 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2592

JPY

Japanese yen

143,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4571

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68400

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3255

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5616

ISK

Iceland króna

90,95

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5752

CZK

Czech koruna

28,338

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

261,07

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8191

RON

Romanian leu

3,4661

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,300

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6675

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6393

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4003

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7623

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9693

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9893

KRW

South Korean won

1 183,14

ZAR

South African rand

7,6956

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0944

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2828

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 075,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,548

PHP

Philippine peso

64,861

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2800

THB

Thai baht

47,598

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF MERRIMAC INDUSTRIES, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Percentage Owned by
               Name                              Jurisdiction of Organization               Merrimac
               ----                              ----------------------------          -------------------

<S>                                            <C>                                             <C>
Merrimac International, Inc. FSC               Virgin Islands, USA                             100%

508790 N.B. Inc.                               Province of New Brunswick, Canada               100%

Filtran Microcircuits Inc.                     Province of New Brunswick, Canada               100%

Industrias Merrimac Incorporada, S.R.L.        Costa Rica                                      100%

MultiMix(R)                                    Costa Rica                                      100%
Microtechnology, S.R.L.

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...First Movers Coalition Announces Expansion

# 									First Movers Coalition Announces Expansion							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 9, 2022

Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry announced a major expansion of the First Movers Coalition, the public-private partnership to commercialize clean technologies through advance purchase commitments, on the initiative’s first anniversary.  Launched by President Biden in partnership with the World Economic Forum at COP26, the First Movers Coalition has expanded to include 65 companies, representing more than 10 percent of the global Fortune 2000 by market value, as well as ten government partners.  New corporate members include General Motors, PepsiCo, and Rio Tinto.

In addition, today the First Movers Coalition launched an unprecedented set of new commitments focused on cement and concrete – in which companies will purchase at least 10 percent near-zero carbon cement and concrete by 2030 – anchored by world-leading companies such as General Motors.  Cement and concrete make up 7 percent of global emissions today and are on track to reach 9 percent by 2050.  This ambitious set of purchasing commitments by First Movers Coalition members will create an early market to stimulate investment in the next generation of technologies needed to decarbonize cement and concrete.

In total, First Movers Coalition corporate members have pledged $12 billion, the world’s strongest demand signal, for bringing emerging innovations to scale.  These commitments will drive investment in next-generation clean steel, aluminum, and cement; near-zero carbon aviation fuels; zero-emission trucking and shipping; and carbon dioxide removal.  The companies that have stepped forward as First Movers will drive down the cost of emerging technologies and bring them to market this decade in order to decarbonize the sectors of the global economy that produce a third of global emissions.

For media inquiries, please contact ClimateComms@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsEmissionsEnvironmentOffice of Global ChangeOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### SPRING LOCK SCAFFOLDING RENTAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY and United National Insurance Company, Appellants, v. CHARLES POE MASONRY, INC., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 77-548, 77-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 15, 1979.

Virgin, Whittle, Garbis & Gilmour and Gary E. Garbis, Miami, for appellants.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, P. J. Carroll and Associates, High, Stack, Lazenby & Bender and Alan R. Dak-an, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on April 25, 1978 (335 So.2d 84), affirming in part and reversing in part *640the summary judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed July 5, 1979, 374 So.2d 487, and mandate now lodged in this court, approved in part and quashed in part and remanded the cause with instructions.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that this court’s mandate heretofore issued in this cause on May 12, 1978, 358 So.2d 84, is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on April 25, 1978, except as is affirmed by the judgment of the Supreme Court dated July 5,1979 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby reinstated. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (9.400(a) Florida Appellate Procedure Rules).
Amendment No. 2 to Health Net 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.36 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 TO THE 
 HEALTH NET, INC. 
 2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Health Net, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Health Net, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the
“Plan”) for the benefit of key employees and directors of the Company; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to
permit the Company to withhold fractional shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 (“Common Stock”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the power to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 8.2 thereof; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board has recommended that the Board amend the Plan as provided below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 4.2(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the third sentence thereof, which states “Any fraction of a share of Common Stock which would be required to pay
such purchase price shall be disregarded and the remaining amount due shall be paid in cash by the optionee” and replacing it with the following sentence: 

 “In the event the Company rounds up and withholds a whole share of Common Stock in order to satisfy the exercise price obligation in respect of the
exercise price of any fraction of a share of Common Stock, the Company shall refund an amount in cash to optionee, which amount shall equal the difference between the Fair Market Value of the whole share of Common Stock withheld to satisfy the
exercise price obligation, less the Fair Market Value of such fractional share of Common Stock.” 
  

	2.	Section 8.6 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence thereof, which states “Any fraction of a share of Common Stock which would be required to satisfy
such an obligation shall be disregarded and the remaining amount due shall be paid in cash by the holder” and replacing it with the following sentence: 

 “Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, in the event the Company rounds up and withholds a whole share of Common Stock in order to satisfy such tax obligation in respect of any fraction of a share of Common
Stock, the Company shall refund an amount in cash to optionee, which amount shall equal the difference between the Fair Market Value of the whole share of Common Stock withheld to satisfy such tax obligation, less the Fair Market Value of such
fractional share of Common Stock.” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Health Net, Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed on this 14th day of
January, 2009. 
  

			
	HEALTH NET, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Karin Mayhew

	Name:	 	Karin Mayhew
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, Organization Effectiveness
§ 421.202 Requirements and conditions. Before entering into or renewing a carrier contract, CMS determines that the carrier— ( a ) Has the capacity to perform its contractual responsibilities effectively and efficiently;
( b ) Has the financial responsibility and legal authority necessary to carry out its responsibilities; and
( c ) Will be able to meet any other requirements CMS considers pertinent, and, if designated a regional DMEPOS carrier, any special requirements for regional carriers under § 421.210 of this subpart.
[45 FR 42179, June 23, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 27307, June 18, 1992]
# C_2006131EN.01002402.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/24

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof) — Siemens AG v Gesellschaft für Visualisierung und Prozeßautomatisierung mbH (VIPA)

(Case C-59/05) (1)

1

(Approximation of laws - Directives 84/450/EEC and 97/55/EC - Comparative advertising - Taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a distinguishing mark of a competitor)

(2006/C 131/43)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Siemens AG

Applicant:

Defendant: VIPA Gesellschaft für Visualisierung und Prozeßautomatisierung mbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 3a(1)(g) of Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising (OJ 1984 L 250, p. 17), as inserted by Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997 (OJ 1997 L 290, p. 18) — Comparative advertising — Products sold under reference to what are essentially the product order numbers of a competitor

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3a(1)(g) of Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 concerning misleading and comparative advertising, as amended by Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997, must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, by using in its catalogues the core element of a manufacturer's distinguishing mark which is known in specialist circles, a competing supplier does not take unfair advantage of the reputation of that distinguishing mark.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                     5
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   Dec-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                        Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                                                  563,137
<SECURITIES>                                                            985,896
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                              0
<PP&E>                                                               18,898,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        4,319,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       16,258,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                         0
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            7,270,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         16,258,324
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      2,094,776
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      1,333,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      600,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            161,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0.000
        

</TABLE>
# CA2005278EN.01000201.xml

| 11.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 278/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 278/2

---

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES

Deputy Director-General Legal Services

(2005/C 278 A/02)

The European Central Bank is seeking applications to fill the position of the Deputy Director-General Legal Services. More details on the profile and tasks covered in this position, as well as information on how to apply can be obtained on the ECB's website at www.ecb.int (Job opportunities).

---
# C_2006092EN.01001201.xml

| 20.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 92/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4108. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4108. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SAMUEL BRUNT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3832 

)

DAWN BRUNT, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 17, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Wesley D. Tibbals, 

Judge. 

Michael J. Rozum of Michael J. 

Rozum, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Jean M. Henne of Jean M. Henne,

P.A., Winter Haven, for Appellee.

ATKINSON, Judge. 

We affirm the single order entered by the trial court titled "final judgment 

denying former husband's supplemental petition for modification of final judgment of 

dissolution of marriage; final judgment on former husband's supplemental petition as to 

modification of child support only; and final orders on former wife's multiple motions for 
- 2 -

contempt/enforcement." See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). However, we grant the 

appellee's motion to dismiss and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal 

challenging the trial court's finding as to the wife's entitlement to attorney's fees. See 

McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). 

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

SILBERMAN and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# _

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21

- 0 532 DARRELL LEE CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Thi rd Party Plaint iff and Appellant,

v. SUPERIOR HARDWOODS AND MILLWORK, INC., d/b/a GRIZZLY FLOORING INSTALLA TION,

Thi rd Party Defendant and Appellee. SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMEN T

Linda St. Peter , th e med iator previously appo inted in this matter, has notified th e Court th at s he declines th e appoint me nt
. Accordingly, M s. St. Peter ’s order of mediator ap point me ntis hereby rescinded and IT IS ORDERED THAT **N athan**  **G. Wa gner**  **,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appo int ment as med iators for Mo ney Judgments appeals which is m aintained pursuant to M.R.App.P. , 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to c onduct th e med iat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time periods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt. A true co py of

thi s order is being mail ed to c ounsel of r eco rd fo r the parti es, or to th e parti es individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s 1 9 th day

of May , 20 21

.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court

c : c: Nathan G. Wagner, Jon G Beal, Krist ine J. Beal, Ian Philip Gillespie 11/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0532