alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            5104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      29425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 39148
<PP&E>                                          206973
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  246121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            45847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         50
<COMMON>                                         10280
<OTHER-SE>                                      200274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    246121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10224
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    90998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  90794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     90794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              90794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     90794
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.200 Basis. ( a ) This subpart is based on certain provisions of section 1862(b) of the Act, which impose specific requirements and limitations with respect to— ( 1 ) Individuals who are entitled to Medicare on the basis of disability; and
( 2 ) Large group health plans (LGHPs) that cover those individuals.
( b ) Under these provisions, the LGHP may not take into account the Medicare entitlement of a disabled individual who is covered (or seeks to be covered) under the plan by virtue of his or her own current employment status or that of a member of his or her family. (§ 411.108 gives examples of actions that constitute taking into account.)
§ 403.745 Condition of participation: Building safety. ( a ) *Standard: Building Safety.* Except as otherwise provided in this section the RNHCI must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Health Care Facilities Code (NFPA 99 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, TIA 12-4, TIA 12-5 and TIA 12-6). *(b) Standard: Exceptions.* Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities Code do not apply to a RNHCI.
( c ) *Waiver.* If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required under paragraph (a) of this section would result in unreasonable hardship for the RNHCI, CMS may waive specific provisions of the Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely affect the health and safety of individuals.
( d ) *Incorporation by reference.* The standards incorporated by reference in this section are approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Office of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may inspect a copy at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish a document in the Federal Register to announce the changes. ( 1 ) National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, *www.nfpa.org*, 1.617.770.3000. ( i ) NFPA 99, Standards for Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire Protection Association 99, 2012 edition, issued August 11, 2011.
( ii ) TIA 12-2 to NFPA 99, issued August 11, 2011.
( iii ) TIA 12-3 to NFPA 99, issued August 9, 2012.
( iv ) TIA 12-4 to NFPA 99, issued March 7, 2013.
( v ) TIA 12-5 to NFPA 99, issued August 1, 2013.
( vi ) TIA 12-6 to NFPA 99, issued March 3, 2014.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[81 FR 26896, May 4, 2016]
#### Judith A. PELLICANO and Robert Kranis, d/b/a Official Copies, Appellants, v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, d/b/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, Appellee.

No. 80-2375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 4, 1981.

Brumer, Cohen, Logan & Kandell and Kenneth R. Duboff, Miami, for appellants.

Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Craig H. Coller, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice because, on two separate bases, it affirmatively appeared, *Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter,*247 So.2d 736 (Fla.3d DCA 1971), *cert. denied,*252 So.2d 797 (Fla.1971), that the plaintiffs could not state a viable cause of action for breach of contract against the defendant Public Health Trust. *Maryland Casualty Co. v. Krasnek,*174 So.2d 541 (Fla.1965); Code of Metropolitan Dade County § 25A— 4(a); 10 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations § 29.15 (3rd ed. 1981).

Affirmed.
# C_2006010EN.01001201.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/12

---

Action brought on 27 October 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-389/05)

(2006/C 10/23)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 October 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by A. Bordes, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by allowing only ‘centres de mise en place’ authorised in France to carry out activities related to the artificial insemination of cattle, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 and 49 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by allowing only ‘centres de mise en place’ authorised in France to carry out activities related to the artificial insemination of cattle, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 and 49 EC;

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Articles 43 and 49 EC respectively lay down the right of establishment and freedom to provide services. Article 46 also provides that the provisions of those Articles and the measures taken in pursuance thereof shall not prejudice the applicability of the domestic provisions of a Member State providing for special treatment for foreign nationals on grounds of public policy, public security, or public health. However, that latter provision is not at issue here, as the Commission's challenge does not concern special treatment for foreign nationals who wish to provide artificial insemination services in France, but the impossibility, in law and in fact, of Community nationals performing that activity because of the monopoly granted in France to ‘insemination centres’ by means of, inter alia, two provisions of French legislation.

Artificial insemination services in France, in fact and in law, are subject to a monopoly in favour of ‘centres de mise en place’, which prevents providers of those services from other Member States from performing those activities, either by means of the right of establishment or by that of freedom to provide services. The French authorities put forward health considerations which, they submit, may justify adopting or retaining domestic measures so restrictive as to nullify those two Treaty freedoms for practical purposes. The Commission disputes the validity of those justifications, however, considering that, by their very nature, those restrictions are in any event disproportionate to the health and safety objectives put forward as the main grounds for them.

---
Exhibit 99.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

of

Berger Holdings, Ltd. (the
Company)



I, Francis E. Wellock,
Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|· |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· |  | the information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 26,
2003

By:

/s/  FRANCIS E. WELLOCK,
JR.Francis E. Wellock, Jr. Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005333EN.01000101.xml

| 29.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 December 2005

(2005/C 333/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1916 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4367 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5581 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,83 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,920 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8443 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6982 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,798 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6075 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6320 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3948 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2386 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7495 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9859 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 206,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5556 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6192 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3845 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 713,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,504 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,232 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,818 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1916

JPY

Japanese yen

139,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68630

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4367

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5581

ISK

Iceland króna

75,83

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

28,920

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8443

RON

Romanian leu

3,6982

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,798

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6075

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6320

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3948

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2386

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7495

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9859

KRW

South Korean won

1 206,85

ZAR

South African rand

7,5556

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6192

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3845

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 713,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,504

PHP

Philippine peso

63,232

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2500

THB

Thai baht

48,818

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Lee WYMORE.

No. 63939.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1979.

In re Robert Lee Wymore, applying for supervisory writs, writ of certiorari (review). Parish of St. Charles.

Writ denied. Relator has adequate remedy by appeal in event of his conviction.
TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                 AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    EXHIBIT II
                                                                    ----------

               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (Unaudited)
               ----------------------------------------------------

                                              Six Months Ended               Three Months Ended
                                                   April 30,                      April 30,
                                            2 0 0 2         2 0 0 1        2 0 0 2         2 0 0 1
<S>                                 <C>               <C>            <C>             <C>
Basic and diluted earnings:
  Net (loss) income                     $(2,694,749)     $  (474,999)    $(2,198,240)    $    169,044

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding      2,579,869        2,559,453       2,594,453        2,559,453
                                        -----------      -----------     -----------     ------------

Basic and diluted earnings
 per common share                       $     (1.04)     $      (.19)    $      (.85)    $        .07
                                        ===========      ===========     ===========     ============


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3194

To provide that the property of innocent owners is not subject to forfeiture

under the laws of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1996

Mr. PICKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that the property of innocent owners is not

subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Innocent Owners’ For5 feiture Protection Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY INTERESTS OF INNO7 CENT OWNERS IN FORFEITURE PROCEED8 INGS.

9 Unless the law specifically so provides, and by ref10 erence to this section overrides the rule of this section,
2

•HR 3194 IH

1 no law of the United States shall be interpreted to permit

2 or require the forfeiture of the property interest of an in3 nocent owner by reason of the criminal conduct of another.

Æ
#### §§ 405.2100-405.2101 [Reserved]
1

 
for Suite LL4 are less than $4,500 per month, Tenant shall have no responsibility forsaid costs associated with Suite LL4. In the event the electric costs for Suite LL4 exceed$4,500 per month, Tenant shall be responsible for the balance of said costs.     Section 2. Titles of Sections. The section titles used in this Amendment are for convenienceof reference only, and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment nor shall they affect themeaning, construction or effect of this Amendment or the Lease.     Section 3. Definitions. Unless otherwise set forth in this Amendment, all capitalized termsshall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Lease.     Section 4. Interpretation. All other terms, covenants and conditions of the Leaseshall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect except as such terms, covenants andconditions have been amended or modified by this Amendment, and this Amendment shall, by thisreference, constitute a part of the Lease.     Section 5. Representations. Tenant hereby represents and warrants to Landlord that,as of the date hereof, it (i) is the sole legal and beneficial owner of all of the right, titleand interest granted to it by the provisions of the Lease, (ii) has not sold, transferred orencumbered any or all of such right, title or interest, and (iii) has the full and sufficientright at law and in equity to execute and deliver this Amendment as the owner of such right,title, and interest, without the necessity of having any other person’s consent thereto orjoinder therein.     Section 6. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment and the terms, covenants andconditions herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Landlord and itssuccessors and assigns, and Tenant and its permitted successors and assigns.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have caused this Amendment to be duly executed underseal on their behalf by their duly authorized representative, as of the date first above written.           WITNESS/ATTEST:   Landlord:                   HILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.agent for the owner
§ 124.701 Applicability. The provisions of this subpart apply to facilities with respect to which grant funds were paid for construction or modernization— ( a ) Under title VI or XVI of the Public Health Service Act; or
( b ) Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary under any of the following statutes: ( 1 ) The Public Works Acceleration Act of 1962, Pub. L. 87-658 (42 U.S.C. 2641 *et seq.*);
( 2 ) The District of Columbia Medical Facilities Construction Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 631 (Pub. L. 90-457);
( 3 ) The Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965, as amended (40 U.S.C. App.).
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Crocker, Bathsheba Nell US Representative to the UN and other International Organizations in Geneva with the Rank of Ambassador- July 2021

# 									Crocker, Bathsheba Nell US Representative to the UN and other International Organizations in Geneva with the Rank of Ambassador- July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  United States Representative to the United Nations and Other International Organizations in Geneva with the rank of Ambassador

CANDIDATE:      Bathsheba Nell Crocker

Bathsheba Nell Crocker is currently a Senior Advisor at the Department of State.  From 2017-2020, she was a Vice President covering humanitarian issues at CARE USA.  Ms. Crocker was the Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs from 2014-2017.  She previously served as a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of State, as the Principal Deputy Director in the State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, and as Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of State.  Earlier in her career, Ms. Crocker was an Attorney-Adviser in the State Department’s Office of the Legal Adviser; Deputy U.S. Special Representative for Southeast Europe Affairs; and Executive Assistant to the Deputy National Security Advisor at the White House.  She also held senior roles at the United Nations, the United Nations Development Program, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies.  Her extensive and substantive policy experience, coupled with her broad management experience and demonstrated ability as a leader, make her a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Representative to the United Nations and Other International Organizations in Geneva with the rank of Ambassador.

Ms. Crocker has also served as a fellow at the University of Pennsylvania and the Brookings Institution; at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University; and at the Council on Foreign Relations, as an International Affairs Fellow.  She has taught at Johns Hopkins University, George Washington University, and American University.  A native of Washington, D.C., Ms. Crocker received a B.A. from Stanford University, an M.A. from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 29, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with Republic of Korea (ROK) Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul today in Washington. The Deputy Secretary reiterated the United States’ steadfast commitment to the ROK and underscored the significance of the U.S.-ROK Alliance as the linchpin of peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Foreign Minister Cho discussed the importance of the U.S.-ROK-Japan trilateral relationship in addressing the most difficult global challenges. The Deputy Secretary and the Foreign Minister also discussed the vibrant U.S.-ROK economic partnership, which has tremendous benefits for both countries. They discussed recent aggressive actions and rhetoric by the DPRK and called on Pyongyang to return to dialogue. They also noted Russia’s concerning military cooperation with the DPRK, including Russia’s use of DPRK ballistic missiles against Ukraine, which poses a serious threat to regional stability and global nonproliferation. They also discussed concerns about PRC support to the Russian defense industrial base. Both sides stressed the importance of providing further support to Ukraine.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonSouth Korea

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3312

To expand the authority of the Department of Defense to donate unusable

food.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 1996

Ms. HARMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To expand the authority of the Department of Defense to

donate unusable food.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO DONATE UNUS4 ABLE FOOD.

5 (a) AUTHORITY FOR DONATIONS FROM DEFENSE

6 AGENCIES.—Section 2485 of title 10, United States Code,

7 is amended by striking out ‘‘Secretary of a military de8 partment’’ in subsections (a) and (b) and inserting in lieu

9 thereof ‘‘Secretary of Defense’’.
2

HR 3312 IH

1 (b) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS.—Such

2 section is further amended—

3 (1) in subsection (a), by striking out ‘‘author4 ized charitable nonprofit food banks’’ and inserting

5 in lieu thereof ‘‘food banks, State and local agencies,

6 and veterans organizations specified under sub7 section (d)’’; and

8 (2) in subsection (d), by striking out ‘‘may only

9 be made’’ and all that follows and inserting in lieu

10 thereof the following: ‘‘may only be made to the fol11 lowing entities:

12 ‘‘(1) A charitable nonprofit food bank that is

13 designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Sec14 retary of Health and Human Services as authorized

15 to receive such donations.

16 ‘‘(2) A State or local agency that is designated

17 by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of

18 Health and Human Services as authorized to receive

19 such donations.

20 ‘‘(3) A chapter or other local unit of a recog21 nized national veterans organization that provides

22 services to persons without adequate shelter and is

23 designated by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as

24 authorized to receive such donations.’’.
3

HR 3312 IH

1 (c) CLARIFICATION OF FOOD THAT MAY BE DO2 NATED.—Subsection (b) of such section is further amend3 ed by inserting ‘‘rations known as humanitarian daily ra4 tions (HDRs),’’ after ‘‘(MREs),’’.

Æ