alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006010EN.01000301.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 10 November 2005

in Case C-29/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 8, 11(1) and 15(2) of Directive 92/50/EEC - Procedure for the award of public service contracts - Contract relating to waste disposal - Absence of call for tenders)

(2006/C 10/05)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-29/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: K. Wiedner) v Republic of Austria (Agent: M. Fruhmann) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 28 January 2004 — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts and M. Ilešič, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 November 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, in that the contract for the disposal of the town of Mödling's waste was entered into without complying with the procedural and advertising rules laid down by Article 8, in conjunction with Articles 11(1) and 15(2) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in that the contract for the disposal of the town of Mödling's waste was entered into without complying with the procedural and advertising rules laid down by Article 8, in conjunction with Articles 11(1) and 15(2) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20.3.2004.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 26, 2009 concerning a request for comment on an information collection that is going to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The document did not contain an ending comment date in the                         **DATES**                         section of the notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For additional information, contact Judith B. Herman at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at                         *Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 26, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-20556, on page 43126, in the second column, correct the “                        **DATES**                        ” caption to read:                    

# DATES:

Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should submit comments by October 8, 2009. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-21596 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 9, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Bradley John Franklin, Eleanor Rose Franklin both of Sidney, 
Montana; and Gregory Lynn Franklin, Othello, Washington, to join a 
group acting in concert with John Franklin, Sidney, Montana; to acquire 
control of 1st United Bancorporation, Inc., Sidney, Montana, and 
thereby indirectly acquire and retain control of 1st Bank, Sidney, 
Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 20, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-20389 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2005253EN.01000401.xml

| 13.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3742 — Corman/Glanbia Consumer Foods/JV)

(2005/C 253/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3742. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3742. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



---

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2008.

/s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger

C. Jayson Brentlinger

Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.46





Exhibit 10.46



THIRD

AMENDMENT TO THE

KEYCORP

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN

FOR KEY EXECUTIVES




     WHEREAS, KeyCorp has established the KeyCorp Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan For Key
Executives (the “Plan”), and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of KeyCorp has authorized its Compensation and Organization
Committee to permit amendments to the Plan, and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of Directors of KeyCorp has
authorized the execution of this Third Amendment,



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to such action of the Compensation and Organization Committee, the
Plan is hereby amended as follows:




	 	 	1. Section 1.7 is amended to delete in its entirety and to substitute therefore the following:
	 
	 	 	“INCENTIVE COMPENSATION AWARD” shall mean an incentive compensation award granted to
a Plan Participant under the KeyCorp Annual Incentive Plan and/or such other
Employer-sponsored line of business incentive compensation plans that KeyCorp in its
sole discretion determines to be included herein for purposes of determining a
Participant’s Incentive Compensation Award under the Plan. For purposes of this
Section 1.7 hereof, an Incentive Compensation Award shall be deemed to be for the
year in which the Incentive Compensation Award is earned (without regard to the
actual time of payment), provided, however, that in no event shall more than one
Incentive Compensation Award be included in determining a Participant’s Salary for
any applicable year.





     2. The amendment set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof, shall be effective as of the first day of
January, 1999.



     3. Except as specifically amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, KeyCorp has caused this Third Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly
authorized officer as of the first day of July, 1999.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	KEYCORP	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
#### Ex Parte Roy Frank CLEMENTS. (Re: Roy Frank Clements, alias v. State of Alabama).

80-104.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
# C_2005217EN.01006303.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/63

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-63/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/130)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-63/97, P.J.M. Janssen v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997

1

---
#### § 405.1120 Filing briefs with the Council.

Upon request, the Council will give the party requesting review, as well as all other parties, a reasonable opportunity to file briefs or other written statements about the facts and law relevant to the case. Any party who submits a brief or statement must send a copy to all of the other parties. Unless the party requesting review files the brief or other statement with the request for review, the time beginning with the date of receipt of the request to submit the brief and ending with the date the brief is received by the Council will not be counted toward the adjudication timeframe set forth in § 405.1100. The Council may also request, but not require, CMS or its contractor to file a brief or position paper if the Council determines that it is necessary to resolve the issues in the case. The Council will not draw any adverse inference if CMS or a contractor either participates, or decides not to participate in Council review.

[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5123, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### § 412.266 Availability of wage data.

A hospital may obtain the average hourly wage data necessary to prepare its application to the MGCRB from Federal Register documents published in accordance with the provisions of § 412.8(b).

[60 FR 45849, Sept. 1, 1995]
#### STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES, Appellant, v. Richard Milton PURDUM, Appellee.

No. 80-1975.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 15, 1981.

*1051Judson M. Chapman and Enoch J. Whitney, Tallahassee, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We quash the writ of certiorari granted below. In statutory certiorari proceedings pursuant to § 322.31, Florida Statutes (1979), the circuit court may not consider the sufficiency of prior traffic convictions forming the basis for revocation of driving privileges. *See Wheeler*v. *Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles,*297 So.2d 128 (Fla.2d DCA 1974).

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
November 31, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Am endment to Exemption #11732 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Dear Sir or Madam:

Terraplane, LLC was issued an Exemption numbered 11732 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0007 (hereinafter 

the “Exemption”) for the purpose of aerial acquisition and research. Terraplane, LLC hereby requests and 

amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies 

with the conditions of the Exemption.

Terraplane, LLC wishes to have available to operate a Lumenier QAV 500 V2 under the same terms and 

conditions contained in the Exemption. Emailed as a confidential document (to Jake Troutman) is the Aircraft 

Manual for the additional UAS. The Lumenier QAV 500 V2 is of similar size, weight, and operation to the other 

UAS already approved in the Exemption. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the 

terms of the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition on another type of unmanned aerial 

vehicle, Terraplane, LLC respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice noes not need to be published 

in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the 

Exemption. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard Harberts 

148 Colchester Drive 

Iowa City, IA 52245 

319-621-1158
# 									DS-1910 Report							

Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization reviews proposed acquisition strategies to fulfill Department of State requirements to provide maximum practical opportunity for U.S. Small Businesses. As a service to U.S. small businesses seeking contracting opportunity with the Department of State, we are pleased to provide a bi-weekly list of the reviews recently completed by the OSDBU. OSDBU reviews are valid for one year from date of issuance.

----

Information provided below is a summary of acquisition reviews completed by the Department’s OSDBU. It does not represent a pre-solicitation synopsis, an invitation for bids, or a request for proposals, nor is it a commitment by the government to purchase the products and/or services described. This information is subject to change and industry assumes all risks for any assumptions, business decisions, and associated costs.

Bureau Names and Acronyms List
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dale J. GUILLOT.

No. 80-K-2934.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Dale J. Guillot, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Avoyelles. No. 44458.

*1356Granted. Sentence set aside. Case remanded to trial court for hearing and determination as to whether relator should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD JAMES FORBES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 490 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2006055EN.01005801.xml

| 7.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/58

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4105 — DSV/Frans Maas)

(2006/C 55/23)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4105. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4105. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005146EN.01000101.xml

| 16.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 June 2005

(2005/C 146/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2069 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6667 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,264 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5388 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,79 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,871 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5742 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,948 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0318 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 157 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,41 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,32 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6631 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5757 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5057 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3834 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6986 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0228 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 221,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2912 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9889 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,295 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 595,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,587 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,699 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,521 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,423 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2069

JPY

Japanese yen

132,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6667

SEK

Swedish krona

9,264

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5388

ISK

Iceland króna

79,79

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,871

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5742

CZK

Czech koruna

29,948

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0318

ROL

Romanian leu

36 157

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,41

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,32

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6631

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5757

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5057

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3834

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6986

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0228

KRW

South Korean won

1 221,62

ZAR

South African rand

8,2912

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9889

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,295

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 595,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,587

PHP

Philippine peso

66,699

RUB

Russian rouble

34,521

THB

Thai baht

49,423

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---