alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 3139

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 Centereach

Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the ‘‘Rose Y. Caracappa

United States Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 245

Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rose Y. Caracappa United

States Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

a reference to the ‘‘Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office

Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 14

             CONSENT OF TANNER + CO., COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                     FOR THE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2002,
                              AND DECEMBER 31, 2001








                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Utah Medical Products, Inc.

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
     Statement Nos. 33-24781, 33-44100, 33-89394, and 33-89434 of Utah Medical
     Products, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated January 21, 2003, appearing
     in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Utah Medical Products, Inc. for the
     years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.



/s/ Tanner + Co.


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K, amendment no. 1, for the period
ended October 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, Debra Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Anthony Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:



|Date: May 18, 2005 |  | /s/DEBRA KOENIGDebra Koenig
Chief Executive Officer      
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                                          
|                   |  |                                                          
|Date: May 18, 2005 |  | /s/ANTHONY CARROLLAnthony Carroll
Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to VICORP Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by VICORP
Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,439; TA-W-63,439A]


Watson Laboratories, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, Carmel, NY; 
Watson Laboratories, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation Also Known as 
Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., Danbury, CT; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on June 20, 2008, applicable to workers of Watson 
Laboratories, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, Carmel, New York. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on July 14, 2008 (73 FR 
40388). The certification was amended on May 18, 2009 to include 
workers of the certified worker group located at an off-site facility 
in Danbury, Connecticut. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on June 18, 2009 (74 FR 28957).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
pharmaceuticals and medicines.
    New information shows that some workers separated from employment 
at the Danbury, Connecticut location had their wages reported under a 
separated unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Danbury 
Pharmacal, Inc.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers at the subject firm who were adversely affected by the shift in 
production of pharmaceuticals and medicines to India and their 
subsequent import.
    Accordingly the Department is amending this certification to 
include workers of the Danbury, Connecticut location whose (UI) wages 
are reported under the also known as name Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,439 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Watson Laboratories Inc., a Connecticut 
Corporation, Carmel, New York (TA-W-63,439) and Watson Laboratories, 
Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, also known as Danbury Pharmacal, 
Inc., Danbury, Connecticut (TA-W-63,439A), who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after May 27, 2007 through 
June 20, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply 
for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of August 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-21157 Filed 9-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# Uruguay

83 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Uruguay	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement by Secretary Antony Blinken and Foreign Minister Francisco Bustillo	  April 13, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Uruguayan Foreign Minister Francisco Bustillo Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 12, 2022Thomas Jefferson Room 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Uruguay	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Uruguayan Interior Minister Heber	  November 9, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Uruguayan President Lacalle Pou	  November 9, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting on Venezuelan Refugee Assistance in Uruguay	  November 8, 2021 

previous page123456…9next page

Back to Top
# C_2006131EN.01003802.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 April 2006 — Camós Grau v Commission

(Case T-309/03) (1)

1

(Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concerning the management and funding of the Institute for Europeon and Latin American Relations (IRELA) - Potential conflict of interest on the part of an investigator - Removal from the investigating body - Impact on the conduct of the investigation and the content of the report of the investigation - Report terminating the investigation - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Action for damages - Admissibility)

(2006/C 131/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Manel Camós Grau (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-F. Pasquier and C. Ladenburger, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, first, for the annulment of the report of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 17 October 2002 terminating the investigation concerning the Institute for Europeon and Latin American Relations (IRELA) and, secondly, for compensation for non-material damage and damage to the applicant's employment prospects claimed to have arisen by virtue of that report

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Commission to pay Mr Camós Grau the sum of EUR 10 000. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Commission to pay Mr Camós Grau the sum of EUR 10 000.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the claims. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the claims.

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
# C_2006018EN.01002302.xml

| 25.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3978 — Oracle/Siebel)

(2006/C 18/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3978. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3978. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 10.98


 





 


Amendment #1 to Employment
Agreement

To Comply with the Provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code


 


Bruce L. Hack


 


This
Amendment #1 to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment #1”)
is entered into as of December 15, 2008, by and between Bruce L. Hack (“Employee”) and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Employer”).  All
capitalized terms shall have the same meaning set forth in the Employment
Agreement (as defined below).


 


RECITALS:


 


Employee
and Employer entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of December 1,
2007 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


Employee
and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects as
set forth herein in order to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


 


AGREEMENT:


 


The
parties hereby agree to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1.                                 Disability.  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to
add a sentence to the end of Section 4(d) to read as follows:  With respect to the payment to you of your
Base Salary during the 180-day period following the start of your Disability
absence referenced in Paragraph 4(a) of this Agreement, payment of such
Base Salary continuation shall commence upon your Disability as defined in Section 409A
of the Code.


 


Except
as specifically set forth in this Amendment #1, the Employment Agreement shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 
If any term or provision of the Employment Agreement is contradictory
to, or inconsistent with, any term or provision of this Amendment #1, then the
terms and provisions of this Amendment #1 shall in all events control.


 


 




	
  AGREED
  AND ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Employee:

  	
   

  	
  Employer:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Activision
  Blizzard, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Bruce Hack

  	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  George L. Rose

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Bruce
  L. Hack

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  

  	
  George
  L. Rose

  
	
  Date:
  

  	
  12.02.08

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  

  	
  Chief
  Legal Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:
  

  	
  12.12.08
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BENJ A MIN GOLDWIRE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1838

[ January 4, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CF002651AXX X

.

Benjamin Goldwire

, Bowling Green

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ERBER and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/26 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| */s/                Yiqing Wan*                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Name:    Yiqing                Wan                                                                                     |   |   |   |
| Title:    Chief                Executive Officer Date:                     July 15, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Nos. 07-15-00073-CR 

 07-15-00074-CR 

JARROD NEAL FLAMING, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 242nd District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court Nos. A-18635-1011 & B-18377-1004, Honorable Kregg Hukill, Presiding 

 

March 30, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Jarrod Neal Flaming, appeals the denial of his writs of habeas corpus 

by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

1

 We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant filed his notices of appeal on February 25, 2015. On March 13, 2015, 

this court directed appellant to show why we have jurisdiction over the subject matter of

the appeals. His response was due no later than March 23, 2015. On March 23, 2015, 

 

1

The writs of habeas corpus were filed pursuant to article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal 

Procedure and were assigned cause numbers WR-82,471-01 and WR-82,471-02 by the Court of Criminal 

Appeals. 
2

appellant filed a letter wherein he stated that he “would like to recall the Writ of 

Mandamus.” The letter referenced the same appellate and trial court cause numbers 

referenced above.2 No other response has been received to date.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over post-conviction 

writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. State v. Holloway, 360 S.W.3d 480, 489 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2012); Keene v. Eight Dist. Court of Appeals, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1995). Courts of appeal have no jurisdiction over criminal law matters 

pertaining to proceedings under article 11.07. In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006) (original proceeding) (stating that courts of appeal 

have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases); see In 

re Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, no pet.) (stating same).

Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeals for want of jurisdiction. In so doing, 

we also deny, as moot, appellant’s pending motion to proceed as a pauper.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

 

2 We note that appellant had filed for mandamus relief which was dismissed prior to the court 

receiving appellant’s letter dated March 23, 2015.
#### § 21.33 General service.

Officers shall be appointed only to general service and shall be subject to change of station.

[21 FR 9806, Dec. 12, 1956. Redesignated at 25 FR 5184, June 10, 1960]
§ 594.406 Provision of services. ( a ) Except as provided in § 594.207, the prohibitions on transactions or dealings involving blocked property contained in §§ 594.201 and 594.204 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, including by an overseas branch of an entity located in the United States: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201(a); or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests subject to §§ 594.201 and 594.204.
( b ) Example: U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, educational, or other services to a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201(a).
Note to § 594.406 :
See §§ 594.506 and 594.507, respectively, on licensing policy with regard to the provision of certain legal or medical services.
·~.. 

Snohomish County 


Executive Office 


Aaron Reardon (425) 388-3460 

County Executive FAX (425) 388-3434 

MS#407 

3000 Rockefeller Avenue 

Everett, WA 98201-4046 

The HO'nO'rable Ray LaHO'O'd 


United States Department O'f TransPO'rtatiO'n 


1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 


",ashingtO'n, pC 20590 
 "~--~March 17,2010' . 

Reference: DO'cket DOT...OST-2010-0018 

. Dear Secretary LaHO'O'd: 

,,() 

On behalf O'fSnO'hO'mish CO'unty, I am writing to' express O'ur SUPPO'rt fO'r Delta Air LiI\~~' 

applicatiO'n fO'r new nO'nstO'P service between Seattle and TO'kyO' Haneda InternatiO'nal AirpO'rt. 

The Puget SO'und, which includes SnO'hO'mish CO'unty, has been an extremely impO'rtant U.S. 

gateway fO'r Japan and O'ther Asian countries with strO'ng histO'rical, cultural and business ties. It 

is alsO' a hub fO'r the entire Pacific NO'rthwest regiO'n, fueled by O'ur hO'metO'wn carriers Alaska and 

HO'rizO'n Air, which prO'vide cO'nnectiO'ns to' 55 U.S. cities fO'r the prO'PO'sed Seattle-TO'kyO' rO'ute. 

Delta's service frO'm Seattle to' Asiahas IO'ng been successful and Seattle's enplanements shO'W 

strO'nger grO'wth than peer airpO'rtsinrecentyears.' Service between 'Seattle and,Haneda Is a ' . 

natural additiO'n fO'rDelta's West CO'ast gateway. 

Delta's new service to' Haneda will create direct and immediate ecO'nO'mic benefits fO'r O'ur regiO'n. 

Delta currently emplO'ys mO're than 1,400 people in O'urstate, and I am sure that number will 

grO'W as the cO'mpany cO'ntinues develO'ping its presence in Seattle. 

"'''''OUiregiO'n'sbuslness travelersiooktO' the cO'nvenience O'fflying intO' TO'kyO"sdO'wntown 

Haneda airpO'rt withO'ut having to' transit to' LO'S Angeles, San FranciscO' O'r Vancouver, B.C. The 

TransPO'rtatiO'n Department has the oPPO'rtunity to' ensure that the Puget SO'und cO'ntinues to' grow 

as an impO'rtantinternational gateway and shO'uld apprO've the frequencies proPO'sed by Delta to' 

serve Haneda. 

We respectfully ask the Department ofTransPO'rtation fO'ritsconsideratiO'nofDeita Air Lines' 

request. 

l .':1; 

Page 1 O'f 1 

county.executive@snoco.org 

www.snoco.org