alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006060EN.01002702.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/27

---

Appeal brought on 9 January 2006 by Tomás Salazar Brier against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-83/03 Tomás Salazar Brier v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-9/06 P)

(2006/C 60/51)

Language of the case: Spanish

An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-83/03 Tomás Salazar Brier v Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 January 2006 by Tomás Salazar Brier, represented by R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers.

Tomás Salazar Brier

Commission of the European Communities

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| (1) | Declare this appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declare this appeal admissible;

| (2) | Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 and, if appropriate, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 and, if appropriate, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance;

| (3) | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This appeal is based on a single plea: infringement by the CFI of Community law in paragraphs 26 to 48 of the judgment under appeal. In particular, the appellant takes the view that the CFI incorrectly interpreted the term ‘circumstances arising from work done for another State’ used in the second indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations.

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 19, 2005

                                    /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    William C. Niegsch, Jr.; Executive Vice
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer of
                                    Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc.
§ 405.958 Effect of a redetermination. In accordance with section 1869(a)(3)(D) of the Act, once a redetermination is issued, it becomes part of the initial determination. The redetermination is binding upon all parties unless— ( a ) A reconsideration is completed in accordance with § 405.960 through § 405.978; or
( b ) The redetermination is revised as a result of a reopening in accordance with § 405.980.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65333, Dec. 9, 2009]
# C_2006074EN.01003202.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 February 2006 — Datac v OHIM

(Case T -341/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 74/60)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 327

To assure that advertisements by States for participation in their lotteries

are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To assure that advertisements by States for participation

in their lotteries are subject to regulation by the Federal

Trade Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOTTERY ADVERTISEMENTS.

4 The advertisements by States to encourage participa5 tion in lotteries administered by the States are subject to

6 the regulations of the Federal Trade Commission respect7 ing unfair and deceptive acts or practices under section

8 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Æ
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




February 24, 2009




Allen Cato, MD, PhD

Cato BioVentures

4364 South Alston Avenue

Durham, NC 27713




Ladies and Gentlemen:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, of even date herewith,
by and between Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Investor listed therein (the
“Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Purchase Agreement.



     As an inducement to enter into the Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to extend to you
certain rights. If the Company sells any shares of its Common Stock, or securities convertible
into Common Stock, to an individual or entity after the Closing and before September 30, 2009 and
the purchaser of such securities receives warrants to purchase additional shares of the Common
Stock of the Company (“Qualified Financing”), then you shall be entitled to receive, without
additional consideration, that number of warrants, with the same terms and conditions as those
provided to the new purchaser(s), deemed issuable in relation to a $200,000 investment in the
Qualified Financing.



     These rights shall not apply to: (a) the issuance of shares of warrants or options issued or
issuable to employees, directors or officers of, or consultants to, the Company or any Subsidiary
pursuant to any plan, agreement or arrangement approved by the Board of Directors of the Company or
(b) the issuance of securities solely in consideration for the acquisition (whether by merger or
otherwise) by the Company or any Subsidiary of all or substantially all of the stock or assets of
any other entity.



     These rights shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) September, 2009 or (ii) the sale of all
or substantially all of the assets of the Company, whether by merger, share exchange or otherwise.



 









 





     EXECUTED as of the date set forth above to be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ALSERES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:

Title:
	 	/s/ Kenneth L. Rice
 

Kenneth L. Rice

EVP & CFO
	 	 






Agreed to and acknowledged as of the date set forth above:




Investor:




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Allen Cato
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Ralph Marimon certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005	
/s/ Ralph Marimon
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46968-46969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Ketchikan, Alaska, September 30, 2009 and October 14, 2009. The purpose 
of these meetings is to discuss potential projects under the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2008.

DATES: The meetings will be held September 30, 2009 and October 14, 
2009 at 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Ketchikan Misty Fiords 
Ranger District, 3031 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written 
comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, 
USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or 
electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbafafaaa5a2aea7b88badb8e5adaeafe5beb8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e5e5e0efe8e4edf2c1e7f2afe7e4e5aff4f2">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 46969]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator 
Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 
228-4105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings are open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and 
individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that 
time.

    Dated: September 2, 2009.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-21934 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 137.292 How do Self-Governance Tribes assume environmental responsibilities for construction projects under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8]? Self-Governance Tribes assume environmental responsibilities by: ( a ) Adopting a resolution or taking an equivalent Tribal action which: ( 1 ) Designates a certifying officer to represent the Self-Governance Tribe and to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under NEPA, NHPA, and related provisions of law; and
( 2 ) Accepts the jurisdiction of the Federal court, as provided in § 137.310 and § 137.311 for purposes of enforcement of the Federal environmental responsibilities assumed by the Self-Governance Tribe; and
( b ) Entering into a construction project agreement under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8].
#### Glen CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 12, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1980.

PER CURIAM.

Glen Chambers appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. His motion alleges that he did not receive effective assistance from his privately retained trial counsel. The circuit court summarily denied the motion on the basis that inadequacy of privately retained counsel cannot provide the basis for post-conviction relief.

We recognize that the trial court was without benefit of a recent United States Supreme Court decision, *Cuyler v. Sullivan,*-U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980), in which the Court held that ineffective assistance of privately retained counsel, as well as appointed counsel, can provide grounds for federal habeas corpus relief. In an opinion written by Justice Powell, the Court reasoned:

> A proper respect for the Sixth Amendment disarms petitioner’s contention that defendants who retain their own lawyers are entitled to less protection than defendants for whom the State appoints counsel. . . . Since the State’s conduct of a criminal trial itself implicates the State in the defendant’s conviction, we see no basis for drawing a distinction between retained and appointed counsel that would deny equal justice to defendants who must choose their own lawyers.

100 S.Ct. at 1716.

Applying *Cuyler v. Sullivan,*we hold that appellant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of privately retained counsel facially state grounds for post-conviction relief. Accordingly, we have reviewed the transcript of appellant’s trial and have determined that nothing therein shows that appellant did not receive reasonably effective assistance of counsel. *Meeks v. State,*382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980).

The order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850 is affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputation of Kinetics for the Hydrogen/Oxygen System Using the Thermodynamic MethodA new method for predicting chemical rate constants using thermodynamics has been applied to the hydrogen/oxygen system. This method is based on using the gradient of the Gibbs free energy and a single proportionality constant D to determine the kinetic rate constants. Using this method the rate constants for any gas phase reaction can be computed from thermodynamic properties. A modified reaction set for the H/O system is determined. A11 of the third body efficiencies M are taken to be unity. Good agreement was obtained between the thermodynamic method and the experimental shock tube data. In addition, the hydrogen bromide experimental data presented in previous work is recomputed with M's of unity.Document ID19970002983Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMarek, C. John*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberWSS-96F-090E-10481NAS 1.15:170340NASA-TM 170340Accession Number97N11762Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970002983.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration, ISOO.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6, announcement is made for a committee meeting of the National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC).

# DATES:

October 8, 2009, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Archives and Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105, Washington, DC 20408.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David O. Best, Senior Program Analyst, ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357-5123, or at                         *david.best@nara.gov.*                         Contact ISOO at                         *ISOO@nara.gov*                         and the NISPPAC at                         *NISPPAC@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters.

This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Thursday October 1, 2009. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access to the location of the meeting.

Dated: September 2, 2009.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-21693 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3190

To prohibit Federal agencies to require or encourage preferences based on

race, sex, or ethnic origin, in connection with Federal contracts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1996

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To prohibit Federal agencies to require or encourage preferences based on race, sex, or ethnic origin, in connection

with Federal contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 No Federal agency may implement, administer, partici4 pate in, or enforce any requirement of, or program of fi5 nancial incentives for, set-asides or preferences in Federal

6 contracting or subcontracting on the basis of race, sex,

7 or ethnic origin.

Æ
SCWC - 20 - 0000 099 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I
CAAP - 20 - 0000099 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A MALE CHILD BORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013 (FC - A NO. 18 - 1 - 005K) AND CAAP - 20 - 0000100 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A MALE CHILD BORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013 (FC - A NO. 18 - 1 - 019K)
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP - 20 - 0000 099 and CAAP - 20 - 0000100;

FC - A N OS . 18 - 1 - 005K and 18 - 1 - 019K) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, J J.) Petitioner ’s Ap plication for Writ of Certiorari filed on March 7, 2022 , is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, April 27 , 202 2 . /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000099 27-APR-2022 08:35 AM Dkt. 17 ODAC