alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.320 Special rules for hospice care. ( a ) *Information.* An MA organization that has a contract under subpart K of this part must inform each Medicare enrollee eligible to select hospice care under § 418.24 of this chapter about the availability of hospice care (in a manner that objectively presents all available hospice providers, including a statement of any ownership interest in a hospice held by the MA organization or a related entity) if— ( 1 ) A Medicare hospice program is located within the plan's service area; or
( 2 ) It is common practice to refer patients to hospice programs outside that area.
( b ) *Enrollment status.* Unless the enrollee disenrolls from the MA plan, a beneficiary electing hospice continues his or her enrollment in the MA plan and is entitled to receive, through the MA plan, any benefits other than those that are the responsibility of the Medicare hospice.
( c ) *Payment.* ( 1 ) No payment is made to an MA organization on behalf of a Medicare enrollee who has elected hospice care under § 418.24 of this chapter, except for the portion of the payment attributable to the beneficiary rebate for the MA plan, described in § 422.266(b)(1) plus the amount of the monthly prescription drug payment described in § 423.315 (if any). This no-payment rule is effective from the first day of the month following the month of election to receive hospice care, until the first day of the month following the month in which the election is terminated.
( 2 ) During the time the hospice election is in effect, CMS' monthly capitation payment to the MA organization is reduced to the sum of— ( i ) An amount equal to the beneficiary rebate for the MA plan, as described in § 422.304(a)(3) or to zero for plans with no beneficiary rebate, described at § 422.304(a)(2); and
( ii ) The amount of the monthly prescription drug payment described in § 423.315 (if any).
( 3 ) In addition, CMS pays through the original Medicare program (subject to the usual rules of payment)— ( i ) The hospice program for hospice care furnished to the Medicare enrollee; and
( ii ) The MA organization, provider, or supplier for other Medicare-covered services to the enrollee.
[70 FR 4729, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 52027, Sept. 1, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.210 Conditions for payment under the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. Except as noted in § 413.174(f), items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2011, under section 1881(b)(14)(A) of the Act and as identified in § 413.217 of this part, are paid under the ESRD prospective payment system described in § 413.215 through § 413.235 of this part. ( a ) *Qualifications for payment.* To qualify for payment, ESRD facilities must meet the conditions for coverage in part 494 of this chapter.
( b ) *Payment for items and services.* CMS will not pay any entity or supplier other than the ESRD facility for covered items and services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary. The ESRD facility must furnish all covered items and services defined in § 413.217 of this part either directly or under arrangements.
[75 FR 49199, Aug. 12, 2010]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3055

To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit

continued participation by Historically Black Graduate Professional

Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1996

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself, Mr. GOODLING, and Mr. CLAY) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and

Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965

to permit continued participation by Historically Black

Graduate Professional Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the following:

5 (1) The Historically Black Graduate Profes6 sional Schools identified under section 326 of the

7 Higher Education Act may receive grant funds if the

8 Secretary of Education determines that such institu-
2

•HR 3055 IH

1 tions make a substantial contribution to the legal,

2 medical, dental, veterinary, or other graduate oppor3 tunity for African Americans.

4 (2) The health professions schools which par5 ticipate under section 326 train 50 percent of the

6 Nation’s African American physicians, 50 percent of

7 the Nation’s African American dentists, 50 percent

8 of the Nation’s African American pharmacists, and

9 75 percent of the Nation’s African American veteri10 narians.

11 (3) A majority of the graduates of these schools

12 practice in poor urban and rural areas of the coun13 try providing care to many disadvantaged Ameri14 cans.

15 (4) The survival of these schools will contribute

16 to the improved health status of disadvantaged per17 sons, and of all Americans.

18 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GRANT RENEWAL LIMITATION.

19 Section 326(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

20 (20 U.S.C. 1063b(b)) is amended by striking the second

21 sentence.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Mori

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Mori							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

October 25, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Tokyo with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Mori Takeo to reaffirm the vital importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance in promoting peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.  The Deputy Secretary and Vice Foreign Minister exchanged ideas to further deepen cooperation between the United States and Japan.  They also discussed shared efforts to promote regional and global security.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateGlobal SecurityIndo-PacificJapanOffice of the SpokespersonRegional Issues

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3285

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the authority of the

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish research corporations at medical centers in the Veterans Health Administration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 23, 1996

Mr. MONTGOMERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish research corporations at medical centers in the Veterans

Health Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3285 IH

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISH2 MENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF3 FAIRS RESEARCH CORPORATIONS.

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 7368 of title 38, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘December 31,

6 1992’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 2000’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Solar Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/s/ Renyi Hou


Renyi Hou


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman


May 17, 2010





/s/ Xuefeng Li


Xuefeng Li


Chief Financial Officer


May 17, 2010







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Apollo Solar Energy Inc. and will be retained by Apollo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### SUCCESSION of Elsie BLOCK, widow of Dr. George S. Bel.

No. 66858.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Emily Dunn, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of. Orleans. No. 10,025.

Writ denied.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 31, 2010 |   |                                                                                 |
|----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |   |                                                                                 |   |
|           | By:    | /s/Joseph M. Jayson                                                                  |   |
|           |   | Joseph M. Jayson                                                                     |   |
|           |   | Individual General Partner ,Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Offic |   |
#### § 405.1118 Obtaining evidence from the Council.

A party may request and receive a copy of all or part of the record of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action, including any index of the administrative record, documentary evidence, and a copy of the audio recording of the oral proceedings. However, the party may be asked to pay the costs of providing these items. If a party requests evidence from the Council and an opportunity to comment on that evidence, the time beginning with the Council's receipt of the request for evidence through the expiration of the time granted for the party's response will not be counted toward the 90 calendar day adjudication deadline.

[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65337, Dec. 9, 2009; 82 FR 5123, Jan. 17, 2017]
HomeMalaysia

# Malaysia

111 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Nepal, and India	  March 4, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Combatting Online Gender-Based Violence in the East Asia and Pacific Region	  March 1, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Strengthening Respect for Freedom of Expression in Malaysia	  February 28, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		Spotlight on Secretary Blinken’s Spotify Travel Playlist	  Ned PriceDecember 22, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Promoting and Protecting Human Rights in Malaysia	  December 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Malaysia	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Ashwad Ismail of Astro Awani	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 15, 2021Chief of Mission ResidenceKuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Town Hall with YSEALI	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 15, 2021Me.reka MakerspaceKuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Dato’ Sri Ismail Sabri bin Yaakob	  December 15, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Energy Transition Roundtable	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 15, 2021Four Seasons HotelKuala Lumpur, Malaysia 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 10, 2010

1207 

# Order

December 10, 2010

141315 & (26)(27)

ELIZABETH HUGHES, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel S. Hughes, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 141315 COA: 296152 Washtenaw CC: 09-000028-NO AMERISTAR JET CHARTER, INC., SIERRA AMERICAN CORPORATION, INC., FREDERICK THOMAS WACHENDORFER, JR., and THOMAS WACHENDORFER AVIATION, INC., Defendants-Appellants, and

AMERISTAR AIRWAYS, INC., AMERISTAR AIR CARGO, INC., KALITTA CHARTERS, L.L.C., KALITTA AIR, L.L.C. d/b/a KALITTA FLYING SERVICE, INC ., KALITTA, L.L.C., KALITTA AIR FREIGHT, L.L.C., KALITTA EQUIPMENT, L.L.C., CONNIE KALITTA HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a CONNIE KALITTA ENTERPRISES, AVCON INDUSTRIES, INC., JOSEPH B. DWERLKOTTE ASSOCIATES, INC. d/b/a J.B. DWERLKOTTE ASSOCIATES, INC., FIELDTECH AVIONICS & INSTRUMENTS, INC., ATLANTIC AVIATION, WESLEY D. DINGLER, MICHAEL E. ROUSEY, MILLION AIR, ADDISON AVIATION SERVICES, and AIRFRA ME SERVICE, INC.,
Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion to f ile notice of supplemental authority is
GRANTED. The motion to strike is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2010 order of the Cour t of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presente d should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2005281EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/2

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

(2005/C 281/03)

Pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court of Justice has appointed, for a period of one year from 7 October 2005, Ms Stix-Hackl as First Advocate General.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,149,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  500,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    738,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,337,439
<PP&E>                                      79,222,149
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,138,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,955,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,607,290
<BONDS>                                     36,358,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       423,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,546,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,955,959
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,626,226
<CGS>                                       24,768,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,926,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,732,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,703,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,172,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                   948,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,224,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,224,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 41192 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PEDRO MONTES

- LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:13

- CR

- 118

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Pedro Montes

- Lopez entered a conditional guilty plea to transporting an undocumented alien and was sentenced to be imprisoned for the time served.
Montes

- Lopez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence on any ground other than the denial of hi s motion to suppress.
Montes

- Lopez argues that the district court erred in determining there was reasonable suspicion to support his traffic stop. He was stopped for driving

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 23, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-41192 Document: 00513435621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2016No. 14

- 41192

2 in the left lane 4.7 miles after a sign warning drivers that the left lane was f or passing only

. (The parties concede that driving without passing in the left lane violates Texas law only if the defendant passes a warning sign to that effect.) A stop is supported by reasonable suspicion w hen “ the totality of the circumstances ” reflec ts “some minimal level of objective justification” for it that is “based on specific and articulable facts” and not only a “mere hunch.” United States v. Castillo , 804 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), cert. de nied, No. 15

- 8238, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1881 ( Mar.
21 , 2016). When reviewing whether a stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, we “ take care both to review findings of historical fact only for clear error and to give due weight to inferences drawn from tho se facts by resident judges and local law enforcement officers.” Id. at 364 ( quoting Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996)). As Montes

- Lopez has not shown a clear error in the district court’s factual findings, which were based on the dashbo ard video, the officer’s testimony, and its own observations , the y are entitled to deference. Id. at 367. The only relevant difference between this case and Castillo is the even shorter distance between the warning sign and the location Montes

- Lopez was first
observed travelling in the left lane

. “The court’s conclusion that it was more likely than not that [Montes

- Lopez’s] car passed the sign takes into account the totality of the circumstances and evaluates the Government’s justification for specific, articulable facts.” Id. We are bound by the holding in Castillo. Jacobs v. Nat’l Drug Intelligence Ctr. , 548 F.3d 375, 378 (5th Cir. 20 08 ) (one panel of the Fifth Circuit cannot overrule another absent an intervening change in the law). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-41192 Document: 00513435621 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2016
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Avatar Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 6“Report”), I, Robert C. Shreve,
      Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




AVATAR
                  SYSTEMS, INC.**Dated: April
                  4, 2008**
              By:
              /s/ROBERT
                  C. SHREVE, JR.Robert
                  C. Shreve, Jr.
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                Chief
                  Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2005271EN.01001302.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rovaniemen hallinto-oikeus by order of that court of 15 July 2005 in Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens län v Lapin liitto

(Case C-289/05)

(2005/C 271/24)

Language of the case: Finnish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Rovaniemen hallinto-oikeus of 15 July 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 July 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens län and Lapin liitto on the interpretation of point 1.7 of rule 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 (1) (now point 1.8 of rule 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1145/2003. (2)

1

2

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 of 28 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards eligibility of expenditure of operations co-financed by the Structural Funds, OJ 2000 L 193, p. 39.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1145/2003 of 27 June 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 as regards the rules of eligibility for co-financing by the Structural Funds, OJ 2003 L 160, p. 48.

2

---