alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 137.412 Do the regulations at 25 CFR Part 900, Subpart N apply to compacts, funding agreements, and construction project agreements entered into under Title V?

Yes, the regulations at 25 CFR Part 900, Subpart N apply to compacts, funding agreements, and construction project agreements entered into under Title V.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,477,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,387,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,367,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,487,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,199,000
<PP&E>                                       4,151,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,253,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,097,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,747,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,326,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,097,000
<SALES>                                     36,006,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,006,000
<CGS>                                       16,139,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,759,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,559,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,223,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,336,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,336,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       66
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 324 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 324

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
         disclosures with respect to phone bank communications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Petri, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Owens, and Mr. 
   Serrano) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
         disclosures with respect to phone bank communications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voters' Right to Know Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT FOR PHONE BANK COMMUNICATIONS.

    Section 318(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 441d(a)) is amended, in the matter before paragraph (1), by 
inserting after ``broadcasting station'' the following: ``phone 
bank,''.
                                 <all>
```
# Sweden

253 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 9, 2023	  Vedant PatelNovember 9, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 7, 2023	  Vedant PatelNovember 7, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm International School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 6, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Tel Aviv, Amman, Ankara, Tokyo, Seoul, and New Delhi	  Matthew MillerNovember 4, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 31, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 31, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 23, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		LGBTQI+ Special Envoy Stern’s Travel to Stockholm	  October 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 3, 2023	  Vedant PatelOctober 3, 2023Washington, D.C.  

previous page1…34567…26next page

Back to Top
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460 

## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL) ***Proposed Site*** October 2010 

### DWYER PROPERTY GROUND WATER PLUME Elkton, Maryland

Cecil County

 **Site Location :**  The Dwyer Property Ground Water Plume (Dwyer) site is a ground water plume with unidentified sources. It is locat ed in a mixed industrial and residential area in northeastern Maryland. The property is just north of the Town of Elkton.

 **Site History:** The Dwyer site is a portion of a former industrial facility , Triumph Explosives, Incorporated, which primarily manufactured incendiary bombs, shells, land mines, grenades, and flares for the Department of Defense fr om the 1930s through the end of World War II

. From 1946 to 1948, Bowers Battery and Spark Plug Company manufactured carbon batteries a t the site

. From 1948 to 1958, Aerial Products, Inc orporated , manufactured black powder fireworks at the site. From 1958 to 1972, Mr. Martin Dwyer produced incendiary flares at the site and used the land to graze cattle. The site is currently abandoned and heavily overgrown.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** Th ere are two known plumes that contain levels of trichloroethene (TCE) above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act M aximum Contaminant L evels (MCLs) for potable water.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  The ground water in the area of the Dwyer site is heavily used for drinking water. There are residential and municipal wells located nearby. Also, there is the potential for vapor intrusion in those residences that are located adjacent to the property and overlying the plumes.

 **Response Activities (to date):** The M aryland D epartment of the Environment (MDE) has completed a remedial investigation o f the property under the State Superfund program.

 **Need for NPL Listing:** The S tate of Maryland referred th e site to EPA

. Other federal and s tate programs were considered but are not viable at this time. EPA received a l etter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the s tate

. The local government support s listing

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regar ding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please se e the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet
at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
### __**Wf'titiiift1iffltt!!&f1ti'Mmm:wrrrrrWff='f'i'fW&j.ft'ft7'WfI!¥2"'W*"f!:1i'W."tt1lt£§Rlfe~****;.~** 

### .

# o

, 

### ;/ 

# VOLUME 3 Titles 167 through 178

(1997 Ed.) 

# 1997 WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Published under authority of chapters 1.08 and 34.05 RCW. 

### Containing all permanent rules adopted under chapter 34.05 RCW, as 

## of January 1, 1997.
[Prerace-p 

### il

# ~O 

# o

# • WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1997 Edition 

# e· 

# • History notes and Reviser's notes Copyright 1997 by the State of Washington 

### CERTIFICATE The 1997 edition of the Washington Administrative Code, published officially by the Statute Law Committee, is, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW, certified to comply with the current specifications of the committee. .

# ~v MARY F. GALLAGHER DILLEY, Chair, STATUTE LAW COMMITIEE

[Preface--p Ii] (I997 Ed.)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Minimum retroreflectivitylevels for blue and brown traffic signs [electronic resource]**
 
Report, April 2008 | Errata,July 2011
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:08-029
Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000628449
 
October 9, 2018
VlsitOrlando. 

George Aguel 

President & CEO 

May 27, 2015 

The Honorable John Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable Penny Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20230 

The Official Tourism Association 

I write to you as President and CEO of Visit Orlando, the official tourism association 

representing the most visited destination in the United States. Our organization represents more 

than 1,200 member companies in Central Florida that are responsible for driving more than $60 

billion of annual economic impact for our community. 

Orlando is known as not just a popular vacation spot for U.S. families, but also as a global 

convention and leisure travel destination. We are home to seven of the top theme parks in the 

world and the No. 2 convention center in the nation. Our major conventions, attractions and 

events attract a significant number of international visitors, representing roughly 20 percent of 

the hotel rooms sold in 2014. This growth is only possible if international travelers find it easy 

and affordable to come to the United States. 

That is why we strongly support the policy of Open Skies. Open Skies agreements have 

increased the number of flights to all regions of the United States, leading to more airline 

competition, access to new and growing markets and lower fares. It is good for travelers, the 

travel industry and the entire U.S. economy. 

Under Open Skies, international visitors have helped Orlando become the first destination to 

surpass 60 million visitors, with more than 62 million in 2014. It has contributed to the fact that 

6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32821-8043 • 407-363-5849 ·Fax 407-370-5022 

e-mail: george.aguel@visitorlando.com • VisitOrlando.com 
Page 2 

May 27, 2015 

one-third of all jobs in Orlando are tourism-related. The economic consequences of suppressing 

the current Open Skies agreements would be significant. For example, the recent announcement 

of a daily nonstop Emirates flight from Dubai to Orlando that's scheduled to begin this fall will 

bring more than $100 million of economic impact annually to our area and open up our 

destination to the growing Asian travel market. The current Open Skies agreements make these 

flight expansions to our country possible and must be protected. 

We compete aggressively with other destinations across the country and around the world. We 

are not afraid of competition. We believe that more competition in all aspects of the travel 

industry is good for consumers and good for the growth of our industry, producing a better, more 

attractive travel "product" and encouraging more visitors to come here. 

That same spirit applies to competition in international aviation as well. We strongly urge you to 

preserve all existing Open Skies agreements and vigorously work to expand this successful 

policy.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3052

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide annual screening

mammography and waive deductibles and coinsurance for screening mammography under the medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1996

Mrs. KENNELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

annual screening mammography and waive deductibles

and coinsurance for screening mammography under the

medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mammog5 raphy Enhancement Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3052 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY UNDER

2 THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

3 (a) PROVIDING ANNUAL SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY

4 FOR WOMEN OVER AGE 49.—Section 1834(c)(2)(A) of

5 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(c)(2)(A)) is

6 amended—

7 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘but under 65

8 years of age,’’, and

9 (2) by striking clause (v).

10 (b) WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE.—

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

12 1833(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(b)) is amend13 ed—

14 (A) by striking ‘‘and (4)’’ and inserting

15 ‘‘(4)’’, and

16 (B) by striking the period at the end and

17 inserting the following: ‘‘, and (5) such deduct18 ible shall not apply with respect to screening

19 mammography (as described in section

20 1861(jj)).’’.

21 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

22 1834(c)(1)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

23 1395m(c)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ‘‘, subject

24 to the deductible established under section

25 1833(b),’’.

26 (c) WAIVER OF COINSURANCE.—
3

•HR 3052 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(c)(1)(C) of

2 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(c)(1)(C)) is amended by

3 striking ‘‘80 percent of’’.

4 (2) WAIVER OF COINSURANCE IN OUTPATIENT

5 HOSPITAL SETTINGS.—The third sentence of section

6 1866(a)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

7 1395cc(a)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting after

8 ‘‘1861(s)(10)(A)’’ the following: ‘‘, with respect to

9 screening mammography (as defined in section

10 1861(jj)),’’.

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to screening mammography per13 formed on or after January 1, 1997.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: STEPHEN LAW,

 Debtor,

STEPHEN LAW,

 Appellant,

 v.

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee,

 Appellee.

No. 09-60023

BAP No. CC-08-1240-MkHMo

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Markell, Hollowell, and Montali, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

FILED

JUN 06 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-60023

Stephen Law appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”)

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his adversary complaint

against the trustee in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a

claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). N. Slope Borough v. Rogstad (In re

Rogstad), 126 F.3d 1224, 1228 (9th Cir. 1997). We affirm.

Contrary to Law’s contention, the bankruptcy court had jurisdiction over the

removed state-law claims against the trustee because they concerned the

administration of the bankruptcy estate. See Maitland v. Mitchell (In re Harris

Pine Mills), 44 F.3d 1431, 1438 (9th Cir. 1995) (plaintiffs’ postpetition state-law

claims against the bankruptcy trustee “for conduct inextricably intertwined with the

trustee’s sale of property belonging to the bankruptcy estate involved a core

proceeding subject to federal jurisdiction”). 

The BAP properly determined that Law’s complaint failed to state a claim

against the trustee because the allegations against the trustee concerned his courtauthorized management of the bankruptcy estate, for which he enjoyed immunity. 

See Bennett v. Williams, 892 F.2d 822, 823 (9th Cir. 1989) (“Bankruptcy trustees

are entitled to broad immunity from suit when acting within the scope of their

authority and pursuant to court order.”). 
3 09-60023

Law’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
#### § 21.46 Merit roll.

Each board appointed pursuant to § 21.30 to consider the qualifications of candidates for appointment as officers shall assign a numerical rating to each candidate for appointment in the Regular Corps who passes the examination, and shall submit a report to the Surgeon General of the ratings and the relative standing of all such candidates for each grade in each profession or specialty within a profession. The Surgeon General shall submit each such report with his recommendations to the Secretary, and, if approved by the Secretary, the report shall constitute a merit roll from which the Secretary shall, in accordance with relative standing, recommend available persons to the President for nomination as commissioned officers of the Regular Corps. A board may consider any newly discovered evidence relating to the physical, professional, or personal qualifications of any candidate examined for appointment. Upon recommendation of such board after review of such evidence, the Surgeon General, with the approval of the Secretary, may correct the rating of a candidate or may qualify or disqualify a candidate. The placing of a candidate's name on a merit roll shall give no assurance of an appointment. A merit roll shall expire when a new merit roll in the same profession or specialty within a profession and grade has been established, but no merit roll shall continue in effect longer than two years after its approval by the Secretary. Every candidate who has not been nominated by the President for appointment prior to the expiration of a merit roll on which his name appears, shall, unless he requests the opportunity to be reexamined, be rated with the next group of candidates of the same profession or specialty within a profession for appointment in the same grade and shall be given the same rating he had on the expired merit roll. If two candidates who were examined at the same time receive the same numerical rating the elder candidate shall assume relative standing on the merit roll over the younger candidate. If a candidate whose name is being transferred from an expired to a new merit roll has the same numerical rating as a candidate whose name is being placed on the new merit roll for the first time, the former shall assume relative standing on the merit roll over the latter. The name of a candidate may be removed from a merit roll in the event that he refuses an appointment when offered. No candidate's eligibility for appointment shall exceed two years unless he again becomes eligible as the result of another examination.

[21 FR 9806, Dec. 12, 1956, as amended at 24 FR 1790, Mar. 12, 1959]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Mitchell MOORE v. Judge Frank SHEA, Section G Orleans Criminal District Court.

No. 80-KH-1624.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Mitchell Moore, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 252-943.

Denied.
​


	​
​
​
​
​



	​


	EXHIBIT 10.5.1



	​


	​



	​


	​



	
	600 Third Avenue 39th Floor
New York, New York 10016
P: +1 212 578 1600 
F: +1 212 578 1832
​



​

International Seaways, Inc. (the “Company”) has agreed to provide you, the undersigned employee, with enhanced severance pursuant to the International Seaways, Inc. Severance Plan effective November 30, 2016, (the “Plan).  [This reflects a continuation of the enhanced severance to which you were entitled under the Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (“OSG”) Severance Plan effective April 1, 2013 (the “OSG Plan”), the obligations of which were assumed by the Company pursuant to that certain Employee Matters Agreement by and among the Company and OSG dated as of November 30, 2016, and this letter replaces the letter previously executed by you in respect of the OSG Plan.] Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.  
​
The parties to this letter agreement hereby agree that, notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary:
​
	1.	In the event that you are entitled to a Severance Benefit under the Plan, you shall be deemed to have twenty-six (26) Years of Continuous Service for the purpose of calculating your Severance Benefit and your actual Years of Continuous Service shall be disregarded for the purpose of calculating your Severance Benefit.

​
	2.	Except as provided in Section 1 herein, the terms and conditions of any severance payments or benefits provided to you pursuant to the Plan shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan.

​
	3.	Nothing herein shall be construed to constitute a guarantee, contract or agreement of employment for any particular period of time and that your employment remains at-will, which means that either you or the Company (or its successor) may terminate the employment relationship at any time, for any reason, without notice, warning or cause.

​
	4.	This letter agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of law principles, and, except as otherwise provided herein, contains the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.

​
	5.	This letter agreement may not be altered, modified, amended or terminated except by a written instrument signed by you and the Company

​
Sincerely,
​
International Seaways, Inc.
​
​
_____________________________
By:    James D. Small III
Title: Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Vice President
          General Counsel and Secretary 
​
ACCEPTED and AGREED:
​
​

​



	​


	​
​
​
​
​



	​


	​



	​


	​



	​


	​



	
	600 Third Avenue 39th Floor
New York, New York 10016
P: +1 212 578 1600 
F: +1 212 578 1832
​



​

​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
 Employee Print Name Above SignatureDate

​