alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005330EN.01001702.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/17

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Dedeu i Fontcuberta v Commission

(Case T-299/02) (1)

1

(Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Work done for another State - Meaning of habitual residence)

(2005/C 330/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Carles Dedeu i Fontcuberta (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, J. Guillem Carrau, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent, assisted by J. Rivas Andrés and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert, lawyers)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of the Commission's implied decision, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 23 September 2002, and its express decision to that effect of 14 November 2002, which refuse to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the allowances associated therewith

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the Commission's memorandum of 25 February 2002 and the Commission's decision of 14 November 2002 in so far as they refuse to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the daily subsistence allowance under Article 5(1) of that annex; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the Commission's memorandum of 25 February 2002 and the Commission's decision of 14 November 2002 in so far as they refuse to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the daily subsistence allowance under Article 5(1) of that annex;

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3) | Orders the Commission to pay the full costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Commission to pay the full costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
#### § 596.305 General license.

The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in this part.
HomeSamoa

# Samoa

43 items

        -    Remarks  		Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman And Samoan Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mata’afa At a Joint Press Conference	  Wendy R. ShermanAugust 5, 2022Apia, Samoa 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Samoan Prime Minister Fiame	  August 4, 2022 
        -    		Travel to Samoa, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Australia, and New Zealand, August 3-9, 2022	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman to Visit Samoa, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Australia, and New Zealand	  August 3, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Samoa	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Samoa	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Samoa Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 31, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Samoa	  April 21, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Samoa	  April 12, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Samoa (22-114) – Defense Assistance Agreement	  January 14, 2022 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46623-46624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541)

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit applications received under the Antarctic

[[Page 46624]]

Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated 
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published 
regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title 45 Part 670 
of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of 
permit applications received.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by October 13, 2009. 
This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit 
Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy at the above address 
or (703) 292-7405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed 
by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541), as amended 
by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, has 
developed regulations for the establishment of a permit system for 
various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain animals and 
certain geographic areas as requiring special protection. The 
regulations establish such a permit system to designate Antarctic 
Specially Protected Areas.
    The applications received are as follows:
    1. Applicant, Permit Application No. 2010-010, Christopher A. 
Linder, 6548 31st Ave., NE., Seattle, WA 98115.

Activity for Which Permit Is Requested

    Enter Antarctic Specially Protected Areas. The applicant plans to 
enter Cape Crozier (ASPA 124) and New College Valley, Caughley Beach, 
Cape Bird (ASPA 116) to take still photographs, video and audio 
recordings to document the natural history of the South Polar Skuas 
nesting in these two locations near penguin rookeries.

Location

    Cape Crozier (ASPA 124) and New College Valley, Caughley Beach, 
Cape Bird (ASPA 116).

Dates

    December 1, 2009 to January 31, 2010.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-21728 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 409

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

#### § 409.62 Lifetime maximum on inpatient psychiatric care.

There is a lifetime maximum of 190 days on inpatient psychiatric hospital services available to any beneficiary. Therefore, once an individual receives benefits for 190 days of care in a psychiatric hospital, no further benefits of that type are available to that individual.
**EXHIBIT
        21**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg A.
        LeClaire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Greg A. LeClaire
 Greg
        A.
        LeClaire
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 March
        15,
        2006
 
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 18 / Thursday, January 29, 2009 / Presidential Documents 5097 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–13 of January 16, 2009 

Eligibility of the Southern African Development Community 

to Receive Defense Articles and Defense Services under the 

Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and the Arms 

Export Control Act, as Amended 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws 

of the United States, including section 503(a) of the Foreign Assistance 

Act of 1961, as amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control 

Act, as amended, I hereby find that the furnishing of defense articles and 

defense services to the Southern African Development Community will 

strengthen the security of the United States and promote world peace. 

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 16, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–2066 

Filed 1–28–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Rianna Eckel

Rmecke193_@gmaill.com , 978-835-6230

My name is Rianna Eckel, and I am a rising senior at American University. I am here today to show my support for the EPA's Clean Power Plan, and urge it to be

finalized. I was born and raised outside of Boston, one of the cities that will be most impacted by climate change. Coastal regions around the world are vulnerable to sea level rise due to increasing ocean temperatures. Yet, the seas along the east coast of the United States, from North Carolina through New England, are rising three to four times faster than the global average. The place where I was raised, and where my curiosity and passion for the environment was cultivated, is under threat as sea level rise could encroach upon the city within my lifetime. In Washington D.C., where I have spent the last three years, the impacts of climate change will also be felt. The Chesapeake Bay will rise, impacting the water levels of the tidal portions of the Potomac and Anacostia rivers, and the communities along their banks. There will be more extreme precipitation events, overflowing D.C's combined sewage and storm water treatment facilities, causing raw sewage to further contaminate the city's waterways. The health of D.C. residents is also at stake. D.C. is already in the top ten worst cities in the United States for ozone pollution, worsening breathing problems and causing the bad air quality warning messages I receive regularly on hot summer days. Ozone pollution will only increase with warmer temperatures, and will pose an enormous threat to the health of D.C. residents. Something that makes me incredibly happy to live here is that this is the most active city in the United States. Residents, including myself, enjoy spending time running, walking and biking and ozone pollution as an impact of climate change could make these seemingly healthy

activities harmful. I believe that the time has come to act on climate change. We, as Americans, can do better. We know that the threats of climate change are real. We have seen them, in extreme weather events like superstorm Sandy, in wildfires raging across the west coast and the droughts in California. If we do not act now to combat climate change, it will continue to permeate our lives both in big ways, like changing the American coastline, and in small ways, like threatening the availability of coffee or avocados. These impacts will continue to grow in magnitude, as there is about a 40-year delay in the impacts of carbon emissions. This means we are seeing the impacts of greenhouse gasses, emitted in the 1970s and since then, global carbon dioxide emissions have nearly doubled. By the time we see the impacts of carbon emitted in my lifetime, it is likely that extreme weather events will be a commonplace occurrence, and wars will be fought over

water. The Clean Power Plan is an opportunity for America to be a leader in the fight against climate change. The EPA's proposed cap on carbon emissions from existing power plants is a huge step in the right direction, and needs to be finalized now. Thank you.
§ 417.482 Access to facilities and records. The contract must provide that the HMO or CMP agrees to the following: ( a ) HHS may evaluate, through inspection or other means, the quality, appropriateness, and timeliness of services furnished under the contract to its Medicare enrollees.
( b ) HHS may evaluate, through inspection or other means, the facilities of the HMO or CMP when there is reasonable evidence of some need for that inspection.
( c ) HHS, the Comptroller General, or their designees may audit or inspect any books and records of the HMO or CMP or its transferee that pertain to any aspect of services performed, reconciliation of benefit liabilities, and determination of amounts payable under the contract.
( d ) HHS may evaluate, through inspection or other means, the enrollment and disenrollment records for the current contract period and three prior periods, when there is reasonable evidence of some need for that inspection.
( e ) In the case of a reasonable cost HMO or CMP to make available for the purposes specified in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section, its premises, physical facilities, and equipment, its records relating to its Medicare enrollees, the records specified in § 417.480 and any additional relevant information that CMS may require.
( f ) That the right to inspect, evaluate, and audit, will extend through three years from the date of the final settlement for any contract period unless— ( 1 ) CMS determines there is a special need to retain a particular record or group of records for a longer period and notifies the HMO or CMP at least 30 days before the normal disposition date;
( 2 ) There has been a termination, dispute, fraud, or similar fault by the HMO or CMP, in which case the retention may be extended to three years from the date of any resulting final settlement; or
( 3 ) CMS determines that there is a reasonable possibility of fraud, in which case it may reopen a final settlement at any time.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993]
HomeGlobal Social Media Presence...Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs

# 									Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs							

## 								Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs Social Media Sites							

        - Algeria
        - Bahrain
        - Egypt
        - Iraq
        - Israel
        - Jordan
        - Kuwait
        - Lebanon
        - Libya
        - Morocco
        - Oman
        - Qatar
        - Saudi Arabia
        - Syria
        - Tunisia
        - United Arab Emirates
        - United States
        - Yemen

Tags

Bureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
# C_2006074EN.01002202.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/22

---

Action brought on 13 December 2005 — Royal Bank of Scotland/OHIM

(Case T-439/05)

(2006/C 74/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) [represented by: J. Hull, Solicitor]

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lombard Risk Systems Limited and Lombard Risk Consultants limited (London, United Kingdom)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 21 July 2005 (Case R 370/2004-4) relating to Opposition Proceedings No. B 370959, notification of which was dated 13 October 2005; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 21 July 2005 (Case R 370/2004-4) relating to Opposition Proceedings No. B 370959, notification of which was dated 13 October 2005; and

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘LOMBARD DIRECT’ for services in classes 35, 36 and 42 — application No 1 523 992

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lombard Risk Systems Limited and Lombard Risk Consultants Limited

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community and national word marks ‘LOMBARD RISK’ and ‘LOMBARD GROUP OF COMPANIES’ for goods and services in classes 9, 36 and 41

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for part of the contested services

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal applied an incorrect legal test when considering whether there was a likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks in as much as it found it conceivable that confusion would occur and that the possibility of confusion could not be excluded. According to the applicant the Board thereby reversed the burden of proof, requiring the applicant to prove that there was no likelihood of confusion. Furthermore, the Board of Appeal failed to give proper reasons for its decision contrary to Article 73 of the Regulation.

Pleas in law:

conceivable

could not be excluded

---
#### Lucious ROBINSON et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. U-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2005296EN.01002403.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/24

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2005 — ASAJA and Others v Council

(Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 - Support scheme in the olive oil sector - Natural and legal persons - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 296/53)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén (ASAJA), Salvador Contreras Gila, José Ramiro López, Antonio Ramiro López, Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Rarras Rosa (Jaén, Spain) (represented by: J. Vásquez Medina, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union.

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The actions are dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The actions are dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicants will bear their own costs and those of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants will bear their own costs and those of the Council.

| 3. | It is not necessary to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

It is not necessary to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.

1

---
# Lithuania

120 items

        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Lithuania	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the WHO-Convened COVID-19 Origins Study	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Lithuania	  March 30, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (21-329) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  March 29, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Estonian Foreign Minister Liimets, Latvian Foreign Minister Rinkēvičs, and Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis	  March 24, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Lithuanian National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Lithuania	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Joint Statement  		COVID-19 and Religious Minorities Pandemic Statement	  August 20, 2020 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Lithuania	  August 5, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Lithuania	  July 29, 2020 

previous page1…678910…12next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues...Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues  Releases

# Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues Releases

123 items

        -    Remarks  		The Ongoing Legacy and Impact of the Holocaust in U.S. Foreign Policy	  Ellen GermainJanuary 26, 2023International Holocaust Remembrance Day 2023, Kupferberg Holocaust Center, Queensborough Community College at the City University of New YorkQueens, New York 
        -    White House Release  		Statement from President Joe Biden on International Holocaust Remembrance Day	  Joe BidenJanuary 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Follow-Up to Terezin Declaration Conference on Holocaust Era Issues 	  December 15, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		20 Years after the Washington Agreement	  Stuart EizenstatNovember 14, 2022General Settlement Fund and Diplomatic Academy EventVienna, Austria 
        -    Press Statement  		The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Working Definition of Antisemitism	  Ned PriceNovember 4, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Looking to the Future: Holocaust Property Restitution, Commemoration and Education	  Ellen GermainNovember 3, 2022Terezin Declaration ConferencePRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC 
        -    Video Remarks  		Terezin Declaration Conference	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 3, 2022Prague, Czechia 
        -    Media Note  		On the Anniversary of the Massacre at Babyn Yar: Joint Statement from Special Envoys for Holocaust Issues Condemning Russian Actions in Ukraine	  September 29, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		State Department, Holocaust Museum Recognize Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum	  July 14, 2022 
        -    Video Remarks  		75th Anniversary of the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum: A Commemoration	  Ellen GermainJuly 13, 2022Washington, DC 

previous page12345…13next page

Back to Top