FIL ED U.S . C OURT O F A PPE ALS ELE VEN TH CIRCUI T Oct obe r 1 8, 200 5 THO MAS K. KA

HN CLE RK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1364 1 Non-Argum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 03-00226 -CV -CA R-5 GEORGIA FARM BUR EAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., GEORGIA FARM BUR EAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COM PANY, Pl ai nti ff s- Appe llants , ve rs us GREAT AMERICAN EXCESS & SUR PLUS INSURANCE CO., a.k .a. Agri cu ltur al Exce ss an d S ur pl us Ins ur an ce Co ., Inc ., De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (O ct obe r 18, 200 5)

Be fo re D U BIN A , CA RN E S an d P RY O R, Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

Inthi s c as e, G eo rg iaF ar

m Bure auMutua l I nsur an ce Co m pany ( “ G eo rg ia Farm ”) sought to rec over benefits under an insurance com pany ’ s professional lia bil ity ins ur an ce pol ic y

( “ IC PL I Po lic y ”) iss ue d by G re at A m er ic anE xc es s and Surplus Insurance Com

pany (“ Gr eat A m erican”). In the district court, the par ties filed cross-m otion s for sum m ary j udgm ent. T he district court entered an order granting Great Am erican’ s m otion and entered a f inal judgm ent in Gre at Am eri can ’s fav or . The d is tri ctco urt b as edit s g ran t o f su m m ary jud gm en t o n t wo sp eci fic ex cl us io ns fou ndin GreatAm eri can ’s Pro fes si on al Liab il it y Po li cy . W e rev ie w “ de novo the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t, ap ply ing the sam e le ga l st an dard s a s th e dis tr ic t c ourt, and v ie w ing a ll fa ct s and
re as ona ble inf er en ce s dr awn th er ef

ro m in the li ght

m ost f av or ab le to the non m ovin g party .” Johnso n v. Booker T . W ashin gton Broad. Serv. , I nc. , 234 F
. 3d 50 1, 5 07 (11 th Cir . 20 00 ). Summ ary jud gm en t i s warran te d i f th e ev id en ce s ho ws

“ that there is no genuin e issue as to any fac t and that the m ovin g party is entitled to a j udgm ent as a m atter of law. ” Fe d. R. Civ. P . 56(c)
. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, w e ag re e w iththe dis tr ic t c ourt that e xc lus ion s J. and N . are unam

bigu ous. T hose exclusio ns applyto loss “ in connection with” a claim for bre ach of contrac t for benefits or c overage due under a G eorgia Far m ins ur an ce pol ic y . T he c la im f or w hic h G eo rg iaF ar

m se ek s c ove ra ge , the3

He ad/ Ha m l etac t i o n , wa s s u ch a c l ai m . Its o u g h tco v er ag e u n d erGe o rg i a F arm ’s
autom obi le ins ur an ce pol ic ie s f or dimini she d va lue
. A cc or din gly , w e co nc lud e that the dis tr ic t c ourt c or

re ct ly r ule d th at e xc lus ion s J. and N
. pr ec lud ed c ove ra ge fo r any los s, inc lud ing the se ttl em en t and d ef en se c ost s, inc ur

re d inc onne ct ion wi thth e H ea d/ Ha m l etac t i o n . M o re o v er , we co n cl u d e t h atth e d i s tri ctco u rt ’s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t f

or G re at A m er ic anon the c ove ra ge que sti on i s dis posi tiv e of

the que sti on o f ba d f

ai th. F or the f or eg oin g r ea sons , w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of

sum m ar y j udgm en t i n f

av or of G re at A m er ic an . AFFIRMED.