alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION4
April3, 2014 Mr. Jason Spinning Coastal SectionChief ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

Jacksonville District Corps ofEngineers P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019
Dear Mr. Spinning, This letter is in regards to the expansion oftheJacksonville Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS). The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (MPRSA), assigns basic responsibility to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for ensuring that oceandredged material disposal activities will not unreasonably degrade orendanger human health, welfare, oramenities, orthe marine environment (MPRSA Sections 102 and 103). Under Section 102 oftheMPRSA, EPA is authorized to designate dredged material disposal sites. EPA site designations arepublished in the Federal Register at 40 CFR Part 228. Following a September2009 request from USACE Jacksonville District (District) for a site modification or new site designation oftheJacksonville ODMDS, EPA Region 4 (Region 4) and the District made an initial determination that a voluntary Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would berequired for this request, with Region 4 designated as the lead agency and the District as a cooperating agency. Region 4 and the District have come to a determination on the most suitable ODMDS expansion configuration, taking into consideration the need for the site, and agency and stakeholdercomments obtained during the public comment period. This final site configuration was evaluatedunderthe

### 5 general (40 CFR § 228.5) and 11 specific (40 CFR § 228.6) criteria in EPA's Ocean Dumping Regulations and determined suitable for the District's and otheruser's need. In finalizing the EIS, Region 4 does not foresee any particularchallenges that would hold up orprevent the designation ofthe new Jacksonville ODMDS. Theremaining tasks will require time for the standard internal processes, rulemaking for the site and final public review inthe Federal Register. Region 4 is working with the District to produce anattainabletimelineto complete the ODMDS site designation process. 

### Ifyou have any questions regarding theJacksonville ODMDS expansion, please contact Mr. Chris McArthurat (404) 562-9391. Sincerely,

ifer S
. Derby, Acting Branch Chief Wetlands, Coastal and Ocean Branch

InternetAddress (URL) • hllp://www.epa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (M1nimum 30% Postconsumer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46654-46655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fourth Meeting--RTCA Special Committee 220/Automatic Flight 
Guidance and Control

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 220/Automatic Flight Guidance 
and Control meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 220/Automatic Flight Guidance and 
Control.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 14-16, 2009. October 14th from 
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and October 16th from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Wichita Airport Hilton, 2098 
Airport Road, Wichita, Kansas, 67209-1941 USA, Tel: 1-316-945-5272, 
Fax: 1-316-945-7620.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 220/Automatic Flight Guidance 
and Control meeting. The agenda will include:

<bullet> Welcome/Agenda Overview.
<bullet> Review and approve previous plenary minutes.
<bullet> Report out from July PMC meeting--Sherif Ali.
<bullet> Report from WG1--MOPS: Status, schedule, issues--Review MS 
Project schedule.
<bullet> Report from WG2--Part 23 Installation Guidance: Status, 
schedule, issues--Review MS Project schedule.
<bullet> Report from WG3--Parts 27/29 Installation Guidance: Status, 
schedule, issues--Review MS Project schedule.
<bullet> Common issues discussion including breadth & level of 
participation, scope with respect to TORs.
<bullet> Breakout into individual WGs.
<bullet> Report out from each WG: Status, schedule, issues.
<bullet> Establish Dates, Location, Agenda for Next Meeting, Other 
Business.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.


[[Page 46655]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-21853 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
No. 99-8916.

#### Montgomery *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.601 Purpose.

This subpart implements section 1834(l) of the Act by establishing a fee schedule for the payment of ambulance services. Section 1834(l) of the Act requires that, except for services furnished by certain critical access hospitals (see § 413.70(b)(5) of this chapter), payment for all ambulance services, otherwise previously payable on a reasonable charge basis or retrospective reasonable cost basis, be made under a fee schedule. Section 1834(l)(17) of the Act requires the development of a data collection system to collect cost, revenue, utilization, and other information determined appropriate from providers of services and suppliers of ground ambulance services.

[67 FR 9132, Feb. 27, 2002, as amended at 84 FR 63193, Nov. 15, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          98,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,189
<PP&E>                                         890,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 623,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     392,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   392,427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 419.44 Payment reductions for procedures. ( a ) *Multiple surgical procedures.* When more than one surgical procedure for which payment is made under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system is performed during a single surgical encounter, the Medicare program payment amount and the beneficiary copayment amount are based on— ( 1 ) The full amounts for the procedure with the highest APC payment rate; and
( 2 ) One-half of the full program and the beneficiary payment amounts for all other covered procedures.
( b ) Interrupted procedures . ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, when a procedure is terminated prior to completion due to extenuating circumstances or circumstances that threaten the well-being of the patient, the Medicare program payment amount and the beneficiary copayment amount are based on— ( i ) The full program and beneficiary copayment amounts if the procedure for which anesthesia is planned is discontinued after the induction of anesthesia or after the procedure is started;
( ii ) One-half the full program and the beneficiary copayment amounts if the procedure for which anesthesia is planned is discontinued after the patient is prepared and taken to the room where the procedure is to be performed but before anesthesia is induced; or
( iii ) One-half of the full program and beneficiary copayment amounts if a procedure for which anesthesia is not planned is discontinued after the patient is prepared and taken to the room where the procedure is to be performed.
( 2 ) For all device-intensive procedures (defined as having a device offset of greater than 40 percent), the device offset portion of the device-intensive procedure payment is subtracted prior to determining the program payment and beneficiary copayment amounts identified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section.
[65 FR 18542, Apr. 7, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 66933, Nov. 27, 2007; 80 FR 70606, Nov. 13, 2015; 81 FR 79879, Nov. 14, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Hampshire Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that the New Hampshire Advisory Committee will 
convene a briefing meeting and planning meeting at 10:30 a.m. on 
Friday, September 25, 2009, at the Legislative Office Building, Room 
201, Concord, New Hampshire 03301. The purpose of the briefing meeting 
is to hear from experts about civil rights issues in the state. The 
purpose of the planning meeting is for the Committee to select the 
topic for its civil rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 23, 2009. 
The address is the Eastern Regional Office, 624 Ninth Street, NW., 
Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or who desire additional information should contact Alfreda 
Greene, Secretary, at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cf9eef3dce9efffffeeb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7712051837020414140559101801">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, September 4, 2009.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-21838 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Sterling COX v. Andrew L. CHASE, Chase Enterprises, Inc. and the Travelers Indemnity Company.

No. 67178.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1980.

In re Sterling Cox, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Iberville. 383 So.2d 1044.

Denied. Result is correct.

DIXON, C. J., would grant the writ.
HomeLatest Stories...DSS Office of Overseas Protective Operations trains with FAST Marines in Jordan

# 									DSS Office of Overseas Protective Operations trains with FAST Marines in Jordan							

DSS Articles

By DSS OPO OSD Section Chief Christopher O'Brien

March 24, 2022

The Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) and the United States Marine Corps have shared a special relationship since World War II when a Marine detachment was assigned to guard the U.S. Embassy in war-torn London. As the need for greater overseas security developed in the ensuing decades, Fleet Antiterrorism Security Teams (FAST) of specially-trained Marines were formed to serve as quick reaction forces to protect U.S. government installations – especially U.S. diplomatic posts – during unforeseen periods of crisis.

As part of this long-standing relationship, the DSS Overseas Protective Operations (OPO) office recently hosted 40 Fleet Antiterrorism Security Teams (FAST) Marines for specialized training at the King Abdullah Special Operations Training Center (KASOTC) in Amman, Jordan.

The OPO office ordinarily uses this unique facility to provide tactical skills training to the Worldwide Protective Services (WPS) contractors it manages who deploy to high-risk locations. However, both OPO and the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy in Amman agreed it would make the perfect training venue for its FAST partners.

FAST Marines practiced tactical skills alongside Regional Security Office Amman, Jordanian security forces, and seasoned WPS instructors focused on joint live fire training, emergency medical, defensive tactics, and close quarters battle.

U.S. Marine Corps Brigadier General Farrell J. Sullivan observed the training alongside DSS special agents from the Amman Regional Field Office. Following the training, OPO Office Director Darryl Waller met with KASOTC General Director General Ra’ad to express his appreciation for partnering with DSS to host the successful FAST training at the facility.

The DSS Office of Overseas Protective Operations (OPO) in the International Programs Directorate, leads, develops, and delivers programs, operational guidance, and resources to sustain security forces at U.S. diplomatic missions.

Tags

Diplomatic SecurityDistrict of ColumbiaDSS ArticlesJordanTraining

Back to Top
§ 407.42 Buy-in groups available to the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands. ( a ) *Basic rule.* The 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands must select one of the buy-in groups described in paragraph (b) in their buy-in agreements.
( b ) *Buy-in groups available* — ( 1 ) *Group 1.* Cash Assistance and Deemed Recipients of Cash Assistance: This buy-in group includes all of the following: ( i ) Individuals who receive SSI or SSP or both and are covered under the State's Medicaid state plan as categorically needy.
( ii ) Individuals who under the Act or any other provision of Federal Law are treated, for Medicaid eligibility purposes, as though the individual was receiving SSI or SSP and are covered under the State's Medicaid state plan as categorically needy.
( iii ) At State option, individuals whom the State must consider to be recipients of AFDC. Individuals a State would be required to include in electing this option would be, but not limited to, individuals eligible for Medicaid on the basis of section 1931(b) of the Act or their receipt of adoption assistance, foster care or guardianship care under Part E of title IV of the Act, in accordance with § 435.145 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Group 2.* Cash Assistance and Deemed Recipients of Cash Assistance and three Medicare Savings Program eligibility groups. This buy-in group includes both of the following: ( i ) Group 1.
( ii ) Individuals enrolled in the— ( A ) Qualified Medicare Beneficiary eligibility group described in § 435.123 of this chapter;
( B ) Specified Low-Income Beneficiary eligibility group described in § 435.124 of this chapter; and
( C ) Qualifying Individual eligibility group described in § 435.125 of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Group 3.* All Medicaid Eligibility Groups: This buy-in group includes all individuals eligible for Medicaid.
[87 FR 66507, Nov. 3, 2022]
40900.

#### WILSON v. ARAGON MILLS et al.

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff in error filed a claim before the Workmen’s Compensation Board. After hearing, the deputy director made findings of fact and an award based thereon in which the employer was ordered to pay the claimant $24.86 together with certain medical and hospital expenses incurred as a result of the injury. The findings of fact were that the claimant was out of work for a period of two weeks following his accident; that he returned to work and worked for a period of approximately two weeks and had to stop work again; and that “the evidence does not show that there is any connection with his having to stop work the last time and the fall and the injury he received on March 5, 1962, the date he *393fell on the job.” The claimant appealed this award to the full board. The board affirmed the award of the director and error is assigned on the affirmance of the board’s award by the superior court. *Held:*

Decided October 1, 1964.

*Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Henry A. Stewart, Sr.,*contra.

Under numerous decisions of this court, an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board will not be disturbed where there is any evidence to support it. The weight and credit to be given the testimony of the witnesses, and the conflicts in the evidence, are matters for determination by the board. *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Williams,*44 Ga. App. 452 (161 SE 853); *Weathers v. American Cas. Co.,*94 Ga. App. 530 (95 SE2d 436); *Wiley v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co.,*98 Ga. App. 241 (105 SE2d 377); *Hansard v. Georgia Power Co.,*105 Ga. App. 486 (124 SE2d 926).

The medical testimony that in the physician’s opinion the employee was able to return to work, though contradicted by the employee’s testimony, supported the finding and award in favor of the employer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended January 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such report on Form 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       237,063
<SECURITIES>                                 175,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,810,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                 258,254
<INVENTORY>                                  541,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,884,545
<PP&E>                                     3,502,549
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,451,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,249,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,140,943
<BONDS>                                    6,982,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         214
<OTHER-SE>                                 6,125,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,249,237
<SALES>                                    1,565,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,565,367
<CGS>                                        866,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,697,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           198,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,178,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (422,910)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (755,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (755,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.35)


</TABLE>
```

[114th Congress Public Law 192]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 672]]

Public Law 114-192
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, as the Barry G. Miller Post 
             Office. <<NOTE: July 15, 2016 -  [H.R. 4372]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BARRY G. MILLER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Barry G. Miller Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barry G. 
Miller Post Office''.

    Approved July 15, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4372 (S. 2465):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            July 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```