alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with European External Action Service Secretary General Sannino

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with European External Action Service Secretary General Sannino							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 31, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

On May 28, Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with European External Action Service Secretary General Stefano Sannino in Brussels. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Secretary General Sannino discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza as part of a hostage deal and the urgency of humanitarian assistance reaching civilians in need. They discussed the challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China, including its support for Russia’s defense-industrial base. They reiterated staunch U.S. and EU support for Ukraine amid Russia’s war of aggression and discussed the use of extraordinary revenues from immobilized Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine. They also discussed cooperation with Indo-Pacific partners and working together on countering disinformation in the Global South.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsChinaDeputy Secretary of StateDisinformationHumanitarian AidIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 18

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg A. LeClaire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



     /s/ Greg A. LeClaire
-----------------------------------
Greg A. LeClaire
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3076

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and chapter 11 of title

31, United States Code, to require that reports accompanying concurrent

resolutions on the budget include analyses, prepared after consultation

with the Congressional Budget Office, of generational accounting information and that Presidents’ annual budget submissions include

generational accounting information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 1996

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. KASICH, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr.

LARGENT, Mr. BASS, Mrs. MYRICK, Ms. MOLINARI, Mr. HOKE, Mr.

HERGER, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. SHAYS,

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. LAZIO of New York, Mr.

SMITH of Michigan, and Mr. CONDIT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and chapter

11 of title 31, United States Code, to require that reports accompanying concurrent resolutions on the budget

include analyses, prepared after consultation with the

Congressional Budget Office, of generational accounting

information and that Presidents’ annual budget submissions include generational accounting information.
2

•HR 3076 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Right to

5 Know Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET.

7 Section 301(e) of the Congressional Budget Act of

8 1974 is amended by striking paragraph (10) and inserting

9 the following:

10 ‘‘(10) an analysis, prepared after consultation

11 with the Director of the Congressional Budget Of12 fice, of the generational accounting consequences of

13 the concurrent resolution, including the projected

14 Federal deficit, at current spending levels, in the fis15 cal year that is 20 years after the first fiscal year

16 covered by the concurrent resolution and the revenue

17 levels (including the increase required in current lev18 els) required to eliminate the projected Federal defi19 cit.’’.

20 SEC. 3. PRESIDENT’S BUDGET.

21 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is

22 amended by adding at the end the following new para23 graph:

24 ‘‘(32) an analysis of the generational account25 ing consequences of the budget including the pro-
3

•HR 3076 IH

1 jected Federal deficit, at current spending levels, in

2 the fiscal year that is 20 years after the fiscal year

3 for which the budget is submitted and the revenue

4 levels (including the increase required in current lev5 els) required to eliminate the projected Federal defi6 cit.’’.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCharacteristics of Residual Mixing Noise From Internal Fan/Core MixersThe jet mixing noise from two fan/core mixer nozzles is studied. Acoustic data from two fan/core mixer nozzles are analyzed to determine the properties of the noise signatures. It was assumed that there were three major contributors to the total noise signature: noise from mixing of the fan and core streams internal to the nozzle; noise from residual mixing of the fan and core streams external to the nozzle; and the noise associated with the fully mixed jet. In general, the low frequency portion of the noise spectra can be associated with the fully mixed jet and can be predicted using an empirical correlation for single round nozzle jet noise. The properties of the noise in excess of the fully mixed levels are studied.Document ID19970010367Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKrejsa, Eugene A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Saiyed, Naseem H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberE-10600NAS 1.15:107395NASA-TM-107395AIAA Paper 97-0382Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 6, 1997End Date: January 10, 1997Sponsors:American Society for Electrical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N15554Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-03-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010367.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006021EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 January 2006

(2006/C 21/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2172 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4630 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2584 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5526 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,29 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0880 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5739 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,387 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8248 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6216 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6134 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6188 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3960 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4409 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7835 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9790 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 181,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4526 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8116 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 411,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,565 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,769 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1480 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,531 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2172

JPY

Japanese yen

142,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4630

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68460

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2584

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5526

ISK

Iceland króna

75,29

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0880

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5739

CZK

Czech koruna

28,387

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8248

RON

Romanian leu

3,6216

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,360

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6134

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6188

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3960

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4409

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7835

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9790

KRW

South Korean won

1 181,66

ZAR

South African rand

7,4526

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8116

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 411,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,565

PHP

Philippine peso

63,769

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1480

THB

Thai baht

47,531

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 99-8936.

#### Ascura *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Lewis MILLER et al. v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF CITY OF VICKSBURG, Mississippi.

No. 47888.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 17, 1975.

Prewitt & Braddock, Vicksburg, for appellants.

Ramsey, Bodron & Thames, Vicksburg, for appellees.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and INZER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            2399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2416
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2416
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    36
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
#### Gerald SALAMON, Appellant, v. Dianne J. SALAMON, Appellee.

Nos. W-203, W-425 and X-261.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 28, 1975.

John S. Winnie and Elizabeth Ann Winnie, of Winnie & Winnie, Gainesville, for appellant.

Robert O. Stripling, Jr., of Chandler, O’Neal, Avera, Gray, Lang & Stripling, Gainesville, for appellee.

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellee has moved to dismiss three appeals by appellant on the ground that appellant has contemptuously failed to comply with orders of the trial court and has removed himself from the jurisdiction of this Court by taking a one year leave of absence from his faculty position at the University of Florida and removing his residence to Iowa. The record before us does not conclusively demonstrate that appel*555lant’s removal of himself from the State of Florida was for the purpose of avoiding the jurisdiction or whether such action was a normal and reasonable temporary move incident to the life of academician.

Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss will be granted unless appellant shows by affidavit or other pleading under oath, within thirty (30) days from date hereof, that he has either returned to the State of Florida or that he will return within a reasonable period of time (prior to oral arguments on the issues involved in these appeals) and thereby become amenable to the process of this Court and the trial court. (See Morris v. Rabara, Fla.App. 2nd 1962, 145 So.2d 265; Bronk v. Bronk, Sup.Ct. Fla. 1903, 46 Fla. 474, 35 So. 870; Durham v. Durham, Fla.App. 4th 1974, 297 So.2d 857 and Mitchell v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 294 So.2d 395)

Appellee’s request for attorney’s fees incident to these appeals is deferred until final disposition.

It is so ordered.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3243 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3243

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
   reduce certain funds if eligible States do not enact certain laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 1996

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
   reduce certain funds if eligible States do not enact certain laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT REDUCTION.

    Section 506 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) In order not to reduce the funds available under this subpart 
by 50 percent (for redistribution to other participating States), a 
State shall, on the first day of each fiscal year succeeding the first 
fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1998, meet the following 
requirements: Have in effect throughout the State in such fiscal year a 
law which--
            ``(1) makes it unlawful for a person to attempt to murder a 
        woman whom the person knows is pregnant if death of the fetus 
        results; and
            ``(2) provides a sentence of not less than 30 years in 
        prison and may be life imprisonment.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005217EN.01006401.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/64

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-69/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/134)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-69/97, M.V. Diederen v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997

1

---
DRAFT
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 03-0106 ENGINEER: Arnold/JB PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No General Eqp.: Respirator:
Health Effects: TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials):

CRSS: Chemical Category:

VP: @25 E C
S-H 2 O: g/L
MW: % < 500 % < 1000 Phys State:

Consumer Use:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2 CBI: No

PMN: 03-0106

SAT (concerns): RELATED CASES: Migration to Groundwater = negligible PBT Potential = P3B1T1 Health: 1-2 (inhalation) Eco: 2 (all releases to water)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2

ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEWINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3 CBI: No

PMN: 03-0106

PROC/USE:

Site/Location: 1-10 unknown customer sites (submission) Days/yr: 250 (CEB default)

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

WATER: <4 kg/site-day over 12 Days/year
from:

to: Basis:

AIR: Negligible

INCINERATION: <PV

LANDFILL: Not required, per SAT

From:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE Tot. # of workers: Days/yr:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Follow-Up to Terezin Declaration Conference on Holocaust Era Issues 

# 									Follow-Up to Terezin Declaration Conference on Holocaust Era Issues 							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 15, 2022

The United States extends its gratitude to the Czech Republic for hosting the Terezin Declaration Conference November 2 – 4, 2022 as part of its EU presidency.  We fully support the “Chair’s Statement” as a follow-up to the conference and countries’ subsequent pledges to assist Holocaust survivors and their heirs and to preserve the memory of the Holocaust.  The United States was represented at the conference by the Special Advisor to the Secretary on Holocaust Issues Stuart Eizenstat, and Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues Ellen Germain.

The conference provided participants and countries the opportunity to take stock of the work that has been done since 47 states endorsed the 2009 Terezin Declaration on Holocaust Era Assets and Related Issues and committed to action on remembrance, education, and restitution or compensation issues.  As the Chair noted, “There is no doubt that much restitution and compensation work remains to be done in some countries and, with sufficient political will, will get done.”  Croatia, Hungary, and Poland are among the countries that still have the greatest work ahead.

At the event, Secretary Blinken delivered a video message urging countries to provide a measure of justice to survivors and their families.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCzech RepublicHolocaust IssuesOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GUNNAR DERRY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 165 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2006060EN.01003003.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/30

---

Action brought on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-41/06)

(2006/C 60/59)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Stromsky and B. Schima, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2002/31/EC of 22 March 2002 implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to energy labelling of household air-conditioners (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that dircetive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2002/31/EC of 22 March 2002 implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to energy labelling of household air-conditioners (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that dircetive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2002/31 expired on 31 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 86 of 03.04.2002, p. 26

1

---
41009.

#### VAUGHAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Decided November 25, 1964.

*Dan L. Lanier,*for plaintiff in error.

*L. C. Anderson, Solicitor,*contra.

Ebeehaedt, Judge.

The pickup truck involved was not alleged to have been used “in conveying, removing, concealing or storing” of nontax-paid liquor, hence the portion of *Code Ann.*§ 58-207 relating to vehicles does not apply. It is contended by the State that the truck might be declared contraband as some “apparatus or appliances” used in the manufacture of moonshine. We do not agree that it comes within that category, but even if it did, in spite of the strict construction we are required to put on the statute, *Premium Distrib. Co. v. State of Ga.,*89 Ga. App. 222, 230 (79 SE2d 57), “apparatus or appliances” are not subject to condemnation under the Code section but only to being “summarily destroyed and rendered useless” *710by the law enforcement officers. *Leath v. Rosser,*52 Ga. App. 587 (1) (183 SE 839).

The judgment overruling intervenor’s demurrer must be

*Reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*