alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                 Certifications

I, Robert C. Shreve, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Avatar Systems Inc.;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rule  13a-14 and 15 (e)) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
          others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which
          this annual report was prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and  procedures  as of December  31,  2004 and in this  annual  period
          presented in this report ("Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on the  required
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     independent  registered  public  accounting firm and the audit committee of
     registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
     function):

     a)   all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  controls  which  could  adversely  affect the
          registrant's  ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report
          financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:     March 31, 2005
                              /s/ Robert C. Shreve, Jr.
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             (principal executive and accounting officer)
§ 416.49 Condition for coverage—Laboratory and radiologic services. ( a ) *Standard: Laboratory services.* If the ASC performs laboratory services, it must meet the requirements of part 493 of this chapter. If the ASC does not provide its own laboratory services, it must have procedures for obtaining routine and emergency laboratory services from a certified laboratory in accordance with part 493 of this chapter. The referral laboratory must be certified in the appropriate specialties and subspecialties of service to perform the referred tests in accordance with the requirements of Part 493 of this chapter.
( b ) *Standard: Radiologic services.* ( 1 ) Radiologic services may only be provided when integral to procedures offered by the ASC and must meet the requirements specified in § 482.26(b), (c)(2), and (d)(2) of this chapter.
( 2 ) If radiologic services are utilized, the governing body must appoint an individual qualified in accordance with State law and ASC policies who is responsible for assuring all radiologic services are provided in accordance with the requirements of this section.
[73 FR 68812, Nov. 18, 2008, as amended at 79 FR 27153, May 12, 2014]
No. 17,457.

#### Ledbetter et al. *v.*Winchel et al.

Appeal. — *Jurisdiction.*— *Who Must be Made Go - Appellants.*— *Notice.*—A co-defendant, against whom a decree is rendered, must, on appeal from such a decree by the other defendants, be joined with them as a co-appellant, and served with notice thereof, otherwise the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction of the appeal, under R. S. 1894, section 647 (R. S. 1881, section 653).

*Same.*— Dismissal. *—Appellees. —Notice.*—An appeal in which one of the defendants, against whom the decree appealed from was rendered, is made an appellee, and is not served with the process issued by the clerk of the Appellate Court to bring the appellees into coru-t, and in which there is no appearance for such appellee, must be dismissed.

From the Grant Circuit Court.

*G. W. Harvey*and *A. Be Wolf,*for appellants.

*R. T. St. John*and *W. H. Charles,*for appellees.

McCabe, C. J.

The appellee Winchel sued the appellants and her co-appellee, Samuel Moore, to foreclose a mortgage on certain described real estate in Grant county. Moore was defaulted. He was made a defendant because it was alleged he held a judgment lien on the mortgaged premises junior to that of the plaintiff’s mortgage.

The only answer filed by appellants was a plea in *110abatement, the issues formed upon which were tried by the court, resulting in a finding thereon against appellants, and they failing to plead over, there was a decree of foreclosure against all the defendants, including Moore. It is assigned for error that the trial court overruled appellants’demurrer to the complaint, overruled their motion for a new trial, and their motion to modify the decree. Moore, one of the defendants against whom the decree is rendered, is made an appellee and not a co-appellant with the appellant.

Filed June 5, 1895 ;

petition to reinstate overruled September 24, 1895.

He was entitled to appeal from the judgment, and being a co-party to the judgment with the appellants he should have been joined as a co-appellant with them, and notice served on him as such which is an unofficial notice. Burns R. S. 1894, section 644, R. S. 1881, section 635; *Gregory*v. *Smith,*139 Ind. 48; *Wood*v. *Clites,*140 Ind. *472; Benbow*v. *Garrard,*139 Ind. 571. No such notice was served on him.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
§ 423.1072 Remand by the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) If CMS requests remand, and the affected party concurs in writing or on the record, the ALJ may remand any case properly before him or her to CMS for a determination satisfactory to the affected party.
( b ) The ALJ may remand at any time before notice of hearing decision is mailed.
**Exhibit 24**POWER OF ATTORNEY     Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), whose signature appears below hereby appoints Robert A. Lindeman or William C. Niegsch,Jr., or either of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf andin any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) for the fiscal yearended October 28, 2007, and likewise to sign and file any and all amendments, includingpost-effective amendments, to the Annual Report, and the Company hereby also appoints such personsas its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign andfile the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and behalf, each such person and theCompany hereby granting to such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, andhereby ratifying all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 17th day of January, 2008.   Signature Title   /s/ Todd B. Barnum Chairman of the BoardTodd B. Barnum     /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, William C. Niegsch, Jr. Secretary and Director   /s/ Jay B. Barney DirectorJay B. Barney     /s/ Mark F. Emerson DirectorMark F. Emerson     /s/ Michael G. Giulioli DirectorMichael G. Giulioli     /s/ Curtis A. Loveland DirectorCurtis A. Loveland     /s/ Donal H. Malenick DirectorDonal H. Malenick
# C_2006025EN.01000901.xml

| 1.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4002 — OMV/ARAL CR)

(2006/C 25/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4002. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4002. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Joseph Bernard WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”) ASTM International (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between September 2008 and December 2008 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at                     *http://www.astm.org*.                

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 9, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 16, 2008 (73 FR 61441).                

 Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E9-2094 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,454,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,570,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,553,218
<PP&E>                                         710,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                 596,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,864,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,484,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,235,674
<COMMON>                                        76,391
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,266,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,864,915
<SALES>                                      2,662,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,662,603
<CGS>                                        1,535,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,152,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,336)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                505,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                   207,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            298,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   298,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
July 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Oldham, Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Oldham                                                                  
|Paul Oldham                                                                      
|Vice President of Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Dated: August 12, 2010

This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Annual Report of Muscle Maker, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ferdinand Groenewald,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | Such
    Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2. | The
    information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019, fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Muscle Maker, Inc.



|By: | /s/
    Ferdinand Groenewald                                                                                                        | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Ferdinand
    Groenewald                                                                                                            | 
|    | Chief
        Financial Officer (Principal Financial
        Officer
        and Principal Accounting Officer)
        June 5, 2020 |
ACCEPTED 06-15-00052-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/19/2015 11:47:06 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
§ 417.144 Evaluation and determination procedures. ( a ) *Basis for evaluation and determination.* ( 1 ) CMS evaluates an application for Federal qualification on the basis of information contained in the application itself and any additional information that CMS obtains through on-site visits, public hearings, and any other appropriate procedures.
( 2 ) If the application is incomplete, CMS notifies the entity and allows 60 days from the date of the notice for the entity to furnish the missing information.
( 3 ) After evaluating all relevant information, CMS determines whether the entity meets the applicable requirements of §§ 417.142 and 417.143.
( b ) *Notice of determination.* CMS notifies each entity that applies for qualification under this subpart of its determination and the basis for the determination. The determination may be granting of qualification, intent to deny, or denial.
( c ) *Intent to deny.* ( 1 ) If CMS finds that the entity does not appear to meet the requirements for qualification and appears to be able to meet those requirements within 60 days, CMS gives the entity notice of intent to deny qualification and a summary of the basis for this preliminary finding.
( 2 ) Within 60 days from the date of the notice, the entity may respond in writing to the issues or other matters that were the basis for CMS's preliminary finding, and may revise its application to remedy any defects identified by CMS.
( d ) *Denial and reconsideration of denial.* ( 1 ) If CMS denies an application for qualification under this subpart, CMS gives the entity written notice of the denial and an opportunity to request reconsideration of that determination.
( 2 ) A request for reconsideration must— ( i ) Be submitted in writing, within 60 days following the date of the notice of denial;
( ii ) Be addressed to the CMS officer or employee who denied the application; and
( iii ) Set forth the grounds upon which the entity requests reconsideration, specifying the material issues of fact and of law upon which the entity relies.
( 3 ) CMS bases its reconsideration upon the record compiled during the qualification review proceedings, materials submitted in support of the request for reconsideration, and other relevant materials available to CMS.
( 4 ) CMS gives the entity written notice of the reconsidered determination and the basis for the determination.
( e ) *Information on qualified HMOs* — ( 1 ) Federal Register *notices.* In quarterly Federal Register notices, CMS gives the names, addresses, and service areas of newly qualified HMOs and describes the expanded service areas of other qualified HMOs.
( 2 ) *Listings.* A cumulative list of qualified HMOs is available from the following office, which is open from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday: Office of Managed Care, room 4360, Cohen Building, 400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201.
[59 FR 49837, Sept. 30, 1994]
#### Dimitri R. SOKHOS, M.D. and Mrs. Dimitri R. Sokhos, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Dennis GOSTOMSKI, doing business as Gus’s Aviation, Appellee.

No. 75-664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 15, 1975.

T. David Burns, Bartow, for appellants.

Bruce W. Pitzer, Venice, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the order appealed from herein is a non-appealable interlocutory order, the above styled appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.