ERRATA SHEET 

BOARD MEETING DATE: May 14,1999 AGENDA NO. 35 

PROPOSAL: Amend Rule 2 18 - Continuous Emission Monitoring and Adopt 

Proposed Rule 2 18.1 - Continuous Emission Monitoring ~erfoxmance 

Specifications 

Change: Provide for semi-annual submission of CEMS data summary within 30 

days following the end of the six-month period being reported. 

Reason for Change: 

The revised semi-annual reporting of CEMS data summary is 

consistent with the recent amendments to EPA 40CFR Parts 5 1,60,6 1 

and 63 - Recordkeeping and Reporting Burden Reduction, as 

inc~rporated in the February 12, 1999 issue of the Federal Register. 

Replace: Pages 1 8, 19 and 20 of Proposed Amended Rule 2 1 8 
L 

Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.) 

years, unless othemise specifically provided bv another District regulation or 

,.A*- permit conditions, and, shall be made available to the Executive Officer upon 

request. 

(2) All calculations. raw parameter data used for calculations, records of the 

occurrence and duration of any start up, shutdown or malfunction, performance 

. . test, evaluation, calibration, adjustment and maintenance of the a 

CEMS as well as calibration gas traceability Q 

shall be retained by the CEMS operator for a 

minimum period of a&a& two years unless otherwise svecificallv provided by 

another District remlation or vermit conditions, and shall be made available to the 

Executive Officer upon request. 

(e fJ Reporting Requirements for New. Modified and Existing CEMS and SCEMS 

Unless otherwise specificallv vrovided bv another District realation or vermit 

conditions. the following reporting requirements shall avplv to new. modified and 

existinp CEMS and SCEMS: . . (1) A CEMS owner or overator 7 a --- D sp&~ shall 

provide a summary of the concentration and/= emission datk as apvlicable, 

obtained from the CEMS, as well as any additional information 

specified by the Executive Officer, to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the 

measurements. The summary shall be submitted iae&Hy once every %lwee - 

six 

months to the Executive Officer, exce~t when more freouent reporting is 

specificallv required by another District rule, or the Executive Officer, on a 

case-bv-case basis, determines that more fresuent re~ortine is necessary to 

accuratelv assess the compliance status of the source. The summarv report 

shall be submitted within 30 days eGfollowin~ the end of the 4kee 

- 

six-month 

period being reported, in the form and manner prescribed by the Executive 

Officer. T& summarv shall be maintained on-site in a retrievable and readable 

form and shall be made available to the Executive Officer upon reauest. The 

submitted summar& shall be available for public inspection at the &cz &+he 

 PA^ Q--l;t;- 3 District. 

(2) The CEMS owner or operator - . . -.nm 

0 - ~AA% s-ysk~~ shall 

report any concentration level and/or emission rate. as applicable. in excess of the 

regulated limit #- C::- - within 94 24 hours or the next working 

- dav after such occurrence in the form and manner prescribed by &is the Executive 

Officer. The report shall include the following information: 
I 

, . Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.) 

(A) Time intemals, date, and magnitude of the excess concentration level, 

,& nature and cause of the excess concentration (if known), corrective 

action(& taken, asd preventive measureM adopted, specific location of 

CEMS, the eauipment or CEMS involved and the facilitv contact person. 

03) Ageraging period used for data reporting shall correspond to the 

averaging period specified in the rule or uermit condition governing the 

concentration andlor emission rate, if ap~licable. . . (3) Reports of D CEMS Failure or Shutdown 

-. (A) a 

shall notify the Executive Officer within 94 24 hours or the next working 

& '" in the event of a system 

failure or shutdown -, which exceeds "" 24 

hours. Zero and calibration checks and routine maintenance do not require 

reporting. 

(B) In the case of a . . 

o CEMS failure or shutdown M, 

compliance with the provisions of Rule 218. Section (5) is waived for a 

period not to exceed 96 consecutive hours. Such waiver is extended 

beyond 96 consecutive hours only if a petition for an interim variance is 

filed in accordance with Regulation V and shall terminate at the time the 

Hearing Board acts upon such variance petition. CEMS owners or 

alternative o~erating condition following the established procedure in 

~isthct Rule 5 18.2 - Federal Alternative O~eratine; Condition. 

(?KC Regularly scheduled CEMS maintenance- .. a shall 

be deferred until the report required under Rule 21 8, ssection (e f)o is 

made, if the system is measuring a concentration equal to or exceeding the 

emission standard, and if such deferral is not reasonably expected to result 

in damage to the system. 

( WDJ Continuous emission monitoring, requirements -C shall 

" . . not apply during 3 : @ eegular calibration 

checks of the system,+Q or Qoutine maintenance and repair 4 lasting 60 

minutes or less^. 

(D 
T 

. t 

Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.) . I 

C 

" * 

Cg) Posting of Written Auproval for New, Modified and Existing CEMS and SCEMS 

The CEMS owner or oDerator of an approved CEMS mx&m~= . . 

b 

t;)rft.ew shall affix & a written notice of approval or a legible facsimile thereof, upon 

the equipment or within 26 feet of the eauipment as prescribed in District RuIe 206, in a 

manner such that it is clearly visible, 4 legible, and safely accessible. In the event that 

the equipment is fe constructed or operated that the notice of approval or its legible 

facsimile cannot be so placed, such notice or legible fscsimile shall be mounted on a 

location approved by the Executive Officer. 
JUL 02 '99 08:55AM SCWMD CPO 909 396 2961 I t 

, . 

' FRIDAY, MAY 14,1999 

SUMMARY 

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF THE 

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALIN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

JACKIE DIX, CLERK OF THE BOARD 

Notice having been duly given, the regular meeting of the South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Board was held at District Headquarters, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California Members 

present:' 

Councilmember &orma J. Glover, Vicc Chairman 

Cities of Orange County 

Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich (arrived at 955 am,) 

County of Los Angeles 

Supervisor Cynthia P. Coad 

County of Orange 

.Mayor Bea Lapisto-Kirtley 

Cities of Los Angeles County - Eastern Region 

' Ms: Mee H.' Lee. 

Senate Rules Committee Appointee -1 

Mayor Ronald 0. Loveridge (left at 1255 p.m.) . 

Cities of Riverside County 

Supervisor Jon D., Mikels 

County of San Bemardino 

Mayor Pro Tern Leonard Paulitz , . Cities of San Bemardino County 

Supervisor S. Roy Wilson, Ed.D. 

County of Rimside 

Members Absent: 

Dr. William Burke, Chairman 

Speaker of the Asstmbly Appointee 

. . Councilmember Hal Bernsoxi . 

Cities of Los Angeles County - Western Region' 

Governor's Appointee 
JUL 02 '99 08:56QM SCQQMD CPO 909 396 2961 

.* . -1- 

- Vice Chairman Glover called the meeting to order at 9:40 am. 

&ening Comments 

. Wallerstein. D. Env.. Exae Officer. Announced that in recognition of the 

District'-% intern program in its laboratory section, the District recently received an 

outstanding employer award from the California Cooperative Education Association. The 

District was nominated for the award by California State University, Fullerton, 

CONSENT CALENDAR 

1. Minutes of April 9,1999 Board Meeting 

2. Execute Contract to Cosponsor Evaluation of Mew01 Fuel Quality Specifications 

for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells 

3. Execute Contract to Cost-Share Dqelopment and Demonstration of Zero- and 

Low-VOC Resin Technology for Advanced Control Measure Dgvelopment 

4. This item was withdrawn by stag. 

5. Execute Contract to Purchase Telemetry Computer 

6, Amend Contracts with Cordoba Corporatipn, Majesw So@ware, Metamor Information 

Technology Services and Sierra Cybmetics; Inc. -to Providd Short- ind'Long-Term ' ' 

Systems Development and Maintenance Support . 

7. Execute Memoranda of Understanding with Councils of Oovemments for Outreach 

Assistance to Local Jurisdictions Utilizing AB 2766 Subvention Funds 

8. Issue RFP for Management Firm to Operate Diamond'Bar Headquarten Cafeteria 

9. Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in May 

10. Purchase Upper-Air Radar Wind Profiler' . d 

1 1. Amend Contract fk~ule 1 186 PMI 0-Efficient Street Sweeper Evaluations 

12. Approve Issuance of Five WPs for TCM Progqms and Programmati6 htreach as 

Part of the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Row 

' 13. Participate MIT'S Proposal to Link Various Air, Quality Planning ~odels' 

' 14. Public Affairs Report . , .. 

15. Progress Report on Public Awareness anda~ducation ~ro~rams to Redkc VOC .; 

' 

Emissions , 

16. Hearing Board Variances and Appeals 

17.' Civil Filing and Civil Penalties Report 

i 1 8. Rule and Control Measure Forecast 
JUL 02 '99 88:56RM SCAQMD CPO 909 396 2961 P.5 .' # , 

,,A'*- 19. Report on Feasibility of Emission Reductions fmm Under-fired broilers (. -

20. Status Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled to Statt 

During Last Six Months of FY 1998-99 

21. Lead Agency Projects and Environmental Donunents Received by the AQMD 

Agenda Items Nos. 7 and 19 were withheld for discussion . 

ON MOTION OF MR. PAULITZ, SECONDED BY MR. MIKELS, THE . BOARD APPROVED AGENDA ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6,8 THROUGH 

18, 20 AND 21, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, BY THE 

FOLLOWING VOTE: 

AYES: Coad, Glover .(except Item #a), Lapisto-Kirtley, Lee, Loveridge, Mikels, Paulitz, and Wilson. 

NOES: None. 

ABSTAIN: Glover (on Item #2 only). 

ABSENT: Antonovich, ~msoh, and Burke. 

22. ~g.rred&g&ax~ Calendar I. 

. ' 7 , Execute Memoranda of Understanding with Councils of Oavelnments for Outreach 

.I- Assistance to Local Jurisdictions Utilizing AB 2766 Subvention Fmds 

0 MOTION OF MS. L~PISTP-KIRTLEY, SECONDED BY, 

DR. WILSON AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Antonovich, 

Bernson, and Burke), THE BOARD: . 

1) AUTHORIZED THE CWAN ' TO EXECUTE 

MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE 

FOLLOWING COUNCILS OF GOVERNmTS: SOUTH BAY 

CITXES COG (%25,000), ORANGE COUNTY COG ($25,000), 

SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED ' GOVERNMENTS 

(SANBAG) ($25,000), AND THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COG 

($25,000), FOR A ONE-YEAR PILOT PROJECT TO PROVIDE 

OUTREACH ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL ~SDICTLONS IN 

SUPPORT OF THE AB 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE 

REGISTRATION FEE SUBVENTION FUND PROGRAM, AS 

RECOMMENDED BY SWF. THE TOT, VAL,, OF ,S 

PROJECT IS NOT TO EXCEED 9 100,000. 

ACTIVITIES HOSTED BY THE LEAD COO MUST' BE OPEN 

TO ANY LOS ANGELES COUNTY CITY. 
.JUL 02 '99 08:57Wl SCQQND CPO 989 396 2961 

. . -3- 

a" ** 19. Report on Feasibility of Emission Reductions &om Under-fired Charbroilers 

Mark ~a~lor addressed the Board on behalf of the California Restaurant 

Association to request that the Board delay initiation of the rulemaking process fbr 

control technologies for commercial under-fired charbroilers for 90 days to allow their 

technical dtime to review the report of the sady conducted by CE-CERT. . 

ON MOTION OF MR. MIKELS, SECONDED BY MR. PAUWTZ AND 

UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED Absent: Antonovich, Bemson, and 

Burke), THE BOARD RECEIVE 6 AND FILED AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 . AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 

. 23. Administrative Committee . 

24. Legislative Committee 

25. Mobile Some Committee ' 

26. Stationary Source Committee 

27. Technology Committee 

28. M6bile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee , 

. . 

I . - ON MOTION OF MS. 'COAD, SECONDED BY MS. LaPISTO- 

' 

KRTLEY, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Antonovich, 

Bexnson, and Burke), THE BOARD RECEIVED AND FILED AGENDA 

ITEMS 23 THROUGH 28, ADOPTING THE FOLLOWING POSITIONS 

QN LEOISLATION, AS RECOMMENDED: 

AB 71 (Cumeen) - HOV Lanes SUPPORT' 

4 . SB 1 15 (Solis) - Environmental Protection WATCH 

SB 192 (Paaa) -- Motor Fuel Labeling 

SB 529 (Bowen) -- Fuel Impacts 

SUPPORT 

SUPPORT 

SB 989 (Sher) - Phase-out of MTBE SUPPORT 

SB 1 195 (Hayden) -- Pamculate Matter: South Coast AQMD SUPPORT . with .,, AMENDMENTS ' 

29.. Rule 2202 Emissions Equivalency Task Force ~ecomkendationo and Final Status Report 

Rrne Brandt, city of Los Angclcs, expressed the City's suppon fir the rooommcnd&ions 

of the task force and expressed appreciation to District staff for agieeing to report back annually 

to the Board on the emission reduction shortfall. 
JUL 02 '99 08:57QN SCMND CPO 909 396 2961 P.7 4' .I 

.- ON MOTION OF MS. LaPISTO-KIRTLEY, SECONDED BY ( 

MR. MIELS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED Absent: Antonovich, 

Bernson, and Burke THE BOARD DIRE .TED STAFF TO B L 

IMPLEMENT THE MISSIONS EQUIVALENCY TASK FORCE . RECOMMENDATIONS TO COVER THE EMISSION REDUCTION . SHORTFALL CREATED BY SB 432, AS RECOMMENDED BY 

STAFF. 

30. Inter-District Trmdkr of Emission Reduction Credits for High Desert Power Projeq 

ON MOTION .OF MS. COAD, SECONDED BY MS. LaPISTOKIRTLEY AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Antonovich, 

Bernson, and Burke), THE BOARD ADOPTED RESOLUTION 

NO. 99-16, APPROVXNG THE MTER-DISTRICT TRANSFER OF ' 

EMISSION OFFSETS TO THE MOJAVE DESERT AIR QUALITY 

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE HIGH DESERT POWER 

PROJECT, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 

Agenda Items No. 31 and No. 32 were considered together. 

3 1. Adopt Executive Officer's FY 1999-2000 AQMD Budget and Work Program 

Rick Pearce, DEOIChief Financial Officer, gave the staff report. , . 8. 

.a,- . Rule .3 10 - Fee Schedules 

32. --end Regulation III - Fees and Rescind Rule 301.2 - ~mncsk for Unpennitted Equipment and (' , 

. . 

Jill Whynot, Planning & Rules Manager, gave the staff report. Copies of an errata sheet . containing the following clarifications by staff to PAR 301 and PAR 307.1 were distributed to , Board members and made available to the public: 

Rule 301, Subparagraph Q, Second Sentence: 

. "&&p#&€~he established pmit application fees found in the applicable pennit fee 

tables and ~rovi&m ofme 3Qlk) shall be paid at the time of filing with the .a RXI&&F additional ovebe fee billed following pennit issuance." 

Rule 307.1, page 15, line f of Table 1: 

The District Fee was corrected fiom "$368" to "$386". 

hearing was opened, and the Board heard testimony regarding Items 31 and 32 . 

CURTIS COLEMAN,mv. on behalf of CMA Sou- CeJjf0tni.a Air Ouality a 

Expressing appreciation ta District staff for its re'cornmendation to forgo significant fee 

increases until the results of the efficiency improvements can be instituted, urged the Board to 

approve the proposed amendments to Regulat~on I11 and adopt the FY 1999-2000 AQMD budget , as recommended by staff. . ( 
,gL 02 '99 88:58FIM SCQQND CPO 909 396 2961 

. . 

RON WILKNISS. Westem States Petroleum Assom-I . . wRequested clazification as to whether the second $12-per-nozzle fee increase for service 

stations in FY 2000-2001 would occur automatically or upon justification by District staff. . . . 

Dr. Wallerstein responded that the increase was being defened htil next yeais budget discussion, at which time it will be addressed based on an analysis of the agency's needs. 

ON MOTION OF DR. WILSON, SECONDED BY ,MS. L~PISTOKIRTLEY, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Antomvich, 

Bernson, and Burke), THE BOARD: 

1) REMOVED FROM RESERVES AND DESlC3NATIONS AL,L 

,MOUNTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FY 1998-99 BUDGET; . B 

2) APPROVED TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS OF $85,974,150; 

' 3) APPROVED AN UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE OF 

$9,443,936 AND TOTAL RESERVES AND DESIGNATZONS 

OF $24,186,936; 

4) ' RECOGNIZED ESTIMATED REVENUES OF %85,036,700; 

5) ESTABLISHED THE CLEAN FUELS SPECIAL REVENUE 

FUND FOR FY 1999-2000, AND TRANSFER OF THE , 

BALANCE, AS OF JUNE 30, 1999, OF THE CLEAN FUELS ' 

RESERVE IN THE GENERAL FUND TO THE CLEAN FUELS 

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND; 

6) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-11, AMENDING THE . 

SALARY RESOLUTION TO EFFECT JOB CLASSIFICATION 

TITLE CHANGES IN HUMAN RESOURCES; 

7) APPROPRIATED $30,000 FROM THE DESIONATION FOR . 

ENHANCED COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES TO ,THE FY 1,998-99 . . BUDGET OF THE OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND 

' COMPLIANCE, SERVICES AND SUPPLIES WR OBJECT, . 

OFFICE EXPENSE ACCOUNT, FOR THE PURCHASE OF 

FIFTEEN LAPTOP COMPUTERS FOR FIELD COMPLIANCE 

MSPECTIONS; AND 

8) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-12, AMENDING 

REGIKATION 111, INCLUDING RULES 301, 303, 304, 304.1, 

306,307,307.1,3,08,309, AND 3 11 AND RESCINDIN0 RULES *I 301.2 AND 310,.AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, WITH THE a 

FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: 
JLlL 02 '99 08:58RH SCWHD CPO 909 396 2961 

Rule 301, Subparagraph (y), Second sentence: 

I# rxhe established permit application fees found in the 

a-it fee tables and ~rovitionr oiRule 3011~) shall be paid at 

the time of filing with the iw&ds additid overtime fee billed 

following permit issuance." 

Rule 307.1, page 15, line 2 of ~Ablc 1: . . 

The District Fee was corrected from "$368" to '3386". 

33. Amend Rule 1 1 13 - Architectural Coatings 

Jack Broadbent, DEOPladng, Area Sources, and Rule Development, gave the staff 

report. Staff distributed to the Board copies of an ~ddendurn which contained revisions to the 

resolution and rule languagk, based on recent comments fiom industry and USEPA. 

(Mr. Antonovich arrived at 10: 1 0 am.) 

The public hearing was opened, and the Board heard testimony from the following 

individuals: 

Speaking in support of PAR 1113: ' 

.- . *ED EDWARDS, JIM EDWARDS, KEN EDWARDS and HOWARD BERMAN, ' 

. 

, Dunn-Edwards PaintCorporation . .-- *PETER VENTURINI, Air Resources Board 

*KAFI MacLEOD, Natural Resources Defense Council and Coalition for Clean Air 

: 

P-TI GHUMAN, Los Angeles County Sanitation District 

HENRY WHEELER, Park Water Company 

TIM CONKM, City of Los Angeles Department of water and Power 

ANDY ROGERSON, California Department of Transportation 

JOHN CLARK, Metropolitan Water District 

BOB STEEL, Specialty Industrial Coatings Corporation , MJCHAEL MOURAD, Poly-Caib, hc, 

RQB--.g&CcjgQg&oa 

*Submitted Written Comments 

Kev Comments; 

P The proposed rule is costly to the paint industry, but believe the averaging provision will 

allow the District to meet the le a1 requirements and industry to be able to provide quality 

coatings to its cvotomers in the kture. 

. . ' P The tcchology is possible in certain areas; for example, DUM-E~&~S has anti-grafliti . 

paints that work and meet the 2006 VOC limit. T4e District has addressed additional 

problematic areas by revising the staff proposal and allowing higher Iimits, i.e., oonosion 

protection in non-industrial environments. 

P Believe the compliance timelines included in the rule along with consideration of reactivity 

and the averaging provision should allow each coating manufacturer to comply in the manner , that is best for them. The staff proposal provides flexibility requested by industry. i. 
. JUL 02 '99 08: 59RM SCRQMD CPO 909 396 2961 

-7- 

~- 9 Dunn-Edwards worked diligently through Congress to obtain hdmg in k' amount of 

$3 million for a state-of-the-art reactivity chamber at UC Riverside. This chamber will 

enable them to determine for the fust time in real world ratios the actual reactivity of many of 

' 

the solvents used in paint. 

9 The- AQMP does include commitments to reduce VOC emissions, from architectural coatings by 75 percent by 2010. These amendments to Rule 11 13 are a necessary step toward meeting 

these SIP commitments, reducing architectural coating emissions by 22 tons per day. The 

ARB concurred with District stafPs assessment that the proposed limits are technologically 

feasible by effective dates proposed. 

9 Concerned that the proposed amendment will not ackeve the 59 tons pa day of VOC 

reductions committed to in the 1 994 SIP, the NRDC and. Coalition..for Clean Air urged the 

Board to direct staff to accelerate development of rule amendments to close the . approximately 25 tons er day shortfall m emissions reductions and examine those categories where proposed future 1 'mits range fiom 100 to 250 gpl to determine whether these can be 

reduced to the more protective level of 50 gpl. 

> Representatives of public agencies providing essential public services commented that the 

essential public services coating category addressed their concerns and they look fmard to 

working with the District in evaluating low-, and zero-VOC coatings as part of the technology 

assessments. . , 

> There are many products available that meet the limits of the proposed amended rule and 

equipmerit tb effectively apply these materials. Some of these products have been in the field 

for over I8 years, with exceptional performance. The coatings'that failed 20 years ago, willhave the same failures 20 yeati from now. It is not because of the raw materials being forced 

on coating manufactuers, it is the design of the coating, the chemistry of the coating, and the 

, applicator. It does not matter if it is zero-VOC or 500 gpl VOC; if you use the best available 

technology and the best application, it will work. 

> The staff report includes nearly all of the alternative approaches requested by industry at the 

beginning of the rulemaking process. 

Speaking in opposilion to PAR 1113: 

GEORGE NICHOL, Robison-Predoso, Inc. 

RICHARD DRISKO, Society for Protective Coatings 

PAUL BEEWR, Henry Company 

RAY ROBINSON, EL RAP 

*WILLIAM SMILAND and KENNETH L. KHACHIGIAN, Smiland & Khachigian, on behalf 

of Southern California Paint & Coatings Alliance (SCPCA) 

CHRISTOPHER FOSTER, Attorney, on behalf of ALARM Caucas . . DAVID LEEHY, Vista Paint Corporation and EL RAP 

*'YrN AYE, Technical Advisory Group KEVIN WORRALL, STUART HAMES, and JAY WANES, Textured Coatings of America 

ROBERT NO.VIEL1, Rohm and Haas Company 

JERRY MULNIX and DONNA WALTMAN, Cal Western Paint 

RAY PETERS, Fine Line Paint Company 

MARIO GALVAN, All American Home Centar '