alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Back
      to Form 10-Q




Exhibit
      32.2





**Certification
      of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
      Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results
      of
      operations as of and for the periods covered therein.








/s/
                J. Kimbrough DavisJ.
                Kimbrough DavisExecutive
                Vice President andChief
                Financial Officer





Date:
      November 9, 2006








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
#### FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. and Underwriters Adjusting Co., Appellants, v. Joan B. BEACH, Appellee.

No. AD-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Ronald S. Webster, of Whittaker, Pyle, Stum & Webster, Orlando, for appellants.

Ronald H. Watson, of Merritt & Watson, P. A., Eustis, for appellee.

PER CURIAM,

The deputy erred in awarding workers’ compensation disability benefits based on physical impairment to the body as a whole under section 440.15(3)(u), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.), because there is no substantial competent evidence of any permanent injury to any unscheduled part of the body. Accordingly, the deputy’s award must be limited to the scheduled benefits under section 440.15(3)(s) for lost use of a leg, based on the highest impairment rating testified to by any physician, 7 percent of the left leg. *Baird-Ray Datsun v. Butler,*400 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); section 440.25(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1978 Supp.).

Claimant’s average weekly wage also was erroneously calculated on the basis of claimant’s 1978 annual income reported to the federal government and unreported earnings. Because claimant worked “substantially the whole” of the 13-week period preceding her injury, her average wage should be one-thirteenth of the wages she actually earned during this period. Section 440.14(1), Fla.Stat. (1977).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
#### § 412.30 [Reserved]
# C_2006036EN.01002201.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg by order of that court of 21 November 2005 in Firma Laub GmbH & Co. Vieh & Fleisch Import-Export v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-428/05)

(2006/C 36/44)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) of 21 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 2 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Firma Laub GmbH & Co. Vieh & Fleisch Import-Export and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas on the following question:

Is a refund within the meaning of Article 11(3), subparagraph 1, first sentence, of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 (1) unduly paid and thus to be reimbursed, where the beneficiary presents the documents supporting payment only in the course of the procedure for repayment and after expiry of the time-limits set out in Articles 47(2) and 48(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1987 L 351, p. 1 (amended, OJ 1997 L 77, p. 12).

1

---
#### F. M. FISHER, as Tax Assessor of Santa Rosa County, et al., Appellants, v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., Appellee.

No. V-242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 8, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1975.

*573Gerald L. Brown of Wells, Brown & Catón, Pensacola, for appellants.

Bert H. Lane of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

By this Interlocutory Appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order of the trial judge denying appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in a case wherein appellee filed a complaint challenging the assessment of appellee’s property for the calendar year 1972. The complaint alleged that appellee returned its property during the subject year at the value of $13,-042,934.00 but that “assessor made and entered upon the assessment books as of January 1, 1972, a total assessed valuation of plaintiff’s real and personal property (with additions) of $21,730,957.00.” The complaint further alleged that “The assessment value thereof has been arrived at by Assessor by the application of criteria different from that applied to other taxpayers of the county, and the value as fixed by Assessor for the year 1972 is arbitrary, unreasonable and grossly excessive and constitutes an illegal and invalid valuation of the property.”

Our affirmance here of the order appealed is not intended to be construed as expression of an opinion as to whether ap-pellee is or is not ultimately entitled to relief upon being heard on the merits of its complaint. We here only hold that the learned trial judge did not err when he denied appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. (See West Virginia Hotel Corporation v. W. C. Foster Company, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1931, 101 Fla. 1147, 132 So. 842 and Graham v. City of West Tampa, Sup. Ct.Fla.1916, 71 Fla. 605, 71 So. 926.)

In addition to the many cases cited in appellants’ brief,1 appellants have called to our attention a recent case of our sister court of the Third District, Dade County v. Transportes Aereos Nacionales, S.A., Fla.App. 3rd 1974, 298 So.2d 570. We find, however, that that case, like the others cited by appellants, is not controlling here.

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting Q J., JOHNSON, J., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge, Retired, concur.

1

. Dickinson v. Davis, Sup.Ct.Fla.1969, 224 So.2d 262; Stiles v. Brown, Sup.Ct.Fla.1966, 182 So.2d 612; Marx v. Welch, Fla.App.3rd 1965, 178 So.2d 737; and Harvey W. Seeds Post No. 29, American Legion, Department of Florida v. Dade County, Fla.App.3rd 1970, 230 So.2d 696.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  783
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           488
<ALLOWANCES>                                              9
<INVENTORY>                                             176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,807
<PP&E>                                                1,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        3,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   447
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              2,923
<OTHER-SE>                                             (896)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          3,493
<SALES>                                               2,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,361
<CGS>                                                   204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         534
<INCOME-TAX>                                            158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     376
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .09
        


</TABLE>
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Tariffs Conference Docket OST-2006- 24287 

International Air Transport Association 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

REQUEST TO WITHDRAW 

PENDING AGREEMENT FROM DOCKET 2005-22029 

lATA REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AGREEMENT APPROVED 

DOCKET OST-05-22029 ACTION DATE September 23.2011 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where appiicable, 27 Marc h 2006 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 14 CFR 385.30 Communications with rCSpeCt tO 

or a review is undertal(en on the Department's own motion. In view of the tJ^ig documen t should b e SCnt tO: 

agreement's noncontroversial nature and the avaiUbility of the above procedures, 

the 21-d^<aeriod in 14CEf< 30142 is wai^d 

( L/t A ~Af /X ^ Douglas Lavin 

. — ^1 ^ Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1750KSt. N.W. #12* Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

(202) 293-9292
§ 421.110 Requirements for approval of an agreement. Before entering into or renewing an intermediary agreement, CMS will— ( a ) Determine that to do so is consistent with the effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program;
( b ) Review the performance of the intermediary as measured by the criteria (§ 421.120) and standards (§ 421.122); and
( c ) Determine that the intermediary or prospective intermediary— ( 1 ) Is willing and able to assist providers in the application of safeguards against unnecessary utilization of services;
( 2 ) Meets all solvency and financial responsibility requirements imposed by the statutes and regulatory authorities of the State or States in which it, or any subcontractor performing some or all of its functions, would serve;
( 3 ) Has the overall resources and experience to administer its responsibilities under the Medicare program and has an existing operational, statistical, and recordkeeping capacity to carry out the additional program responsibilities it proposes to assume. CMS will presume that an intermediary or prospective intermediary meets this requirement if it has at least 5 years experience in paying for or reimbursing the cost of health services;
( 4 ) Will serve a sufficient number of providers to permit a finding of effective and efficient administration. Under this criterion no intermediary or prospective intermediary shall be found to be not efficient or effective solely on the grounds that it serves only providers located in a single State;
( 5 ) Has acted in good faith to achieve effective cooperation with the providers it will service and with the physicians and medical societies in the area;
( 6 ) Has established a record of integrity and satisfactory service to the public; and
( 7 ) Has an affirmative equal employment opportunity program that complies with the fair employment provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 11246, as amended.
#### Ex parte ALABAMA POWER COMPANY (Re: Alabama Power Company v. Fred H. Gielle, Jr., et al.)

79-95.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 21, 1979.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
  /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    
    /s/ Linda J. MilesPatrick J. Moty
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
----

THE DAPHNE II PROGRAMME (2004-2008)

to prevent and combat violence against children, young people and women, and to protect victims and groups at risk

Call for proposals for specific co-funded projects 2006

(Annuls and replaces 2005/C 320/09)

(2005/C 324/11)

A call for proposals concerning the Daphne II programme is currently launched. The priorities, the full text of the call, the application forms and the guidelines can be found on the Daphne website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/funding/daphne/funding_daphne_en.htm

To assist applicants in the preparation of their proposals, a helpdesk has been set up. It can be accessed by e-mail: daphne-helpdesk@transtec.be

You must return the completed application form and all its annexes (in 4 paper copies + one electronic copy on a diskette or CD-ROM) to the Commission by 10 February 2006, at the following address:

Your envelope must be marked ‘APPLICATION UNDER THE DAPHNE II PROGRAMME’.

----
40971, 40972.

#### CREWS v. SLAPPEY (two cases).

Decided October 15, 1964.

*Bruce B. Edwards,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Dennis & Barton, John T. Dennis,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

These cases are controlled by *Fickling v. City Council of Augusta,*110 Ga. App. 330 (138 SE2d 437). Allegations that the defendant, an owner of land in a residential section and on which there was an artificial pond, permitted table tops to accumulate therein, float and become waterlogged, and that plaintiff’s children, aged 7 and 10, being attracted to the table tops, sought to use them as rafts, fell therefrom and were drowned, do not prevent the application of the rule of *Fickling*or create an exception.

The general demurrers were properly sustained.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
#### Aldean H. SANTUCCI, Appellant, v. Vincent G. SANTUCCI, Appellee.

No. 73-725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 16, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Antoine DUHON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, State of Louisiana, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 4724.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Sept. 18, 1974.

*256J. Lyle DeBellevue, Crowley, for plaintiff-appellant.

Foye L. Lowe, Jr., Asst. General Counsel Dept, of Public Safety, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

The appellant did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been regularly docketed for hearing, and no brief has been filed in his behalf. The appeal thus is considered as having been abandoned, and accordingly the appeal is hereby dismissed. Rule VII, Section 5(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal dismissed.
ex_219162.htm


Exhibit 10.80


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


WILSON BANK & TRUST


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


MADE EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 2015


 


This Second Amendment is adopted this 28th day of December, 2020, by and between Wilson Bank & Trust, a Tennessee corporation (the “Bank”) and John Foster (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have previously entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan made effective on May 22, 2015, (the “Agreement”), an unfunded arrangement maintained to encourage the Executive to remain an employee of the Bank by providing retirement benefits to the Executive upon his retirement, or other events as provided in the Agreement, payable out of the Bank’s general assets;


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have agreed to amend the Agreement to increase the amount of benefit payable under the agreement without affecting the time or form of payments thereunder;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


Paragraph 1.2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


1.2. “Annuity Contract” means the following annuity contracts purchased and solely owned by the Bank, or such other annuity contracts as the Bank may purchase from time to time for the benefit of the Executive:


 


	 	Insurance Carrier	Policy Number
	 	Midland National Life Insurance Company	8500543841
	 	National Western Life Insurance Company 	0101396046



 


The Agreement is otherwise ratified and confirmed in all respects.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have signed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


EXECUTIVE:


 


/s/ John Foster                                                 


 


 


WILSON BANK & TRUST


 


By: /s/ John C. McDearman                           


 


Its: CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT INCLUDED IN PART I, ITEM 1 OF 
THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 
FEBRUARY 28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         11,034,349
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,132,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                      654,137
<INVENTORY>                                     3,856,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,989,143
<PP&E>                                          2,693,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,085,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,765,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,343,062
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                          462,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                    12,231,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,469,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,765,353
<SALES>                                         2,420,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,420,027
<CGS>                                           1,601,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,601,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,599,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 23,829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,415,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,415,917)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,415,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.19)


        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3182 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3182

    To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to alcohol and 
 controlled substances testing of operators of motor vehicles used to 
    transport agricultural commodities and property for small local 
                              governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1996

 Mr. Ewing (for himself, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Weller, Mr. LaHood, and Mr. 
   Emerson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to alcohol and 
 controlled substances testing of operators of motor vehicles used to 
    transport agricultural commodities and property for small local 
                              governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 31306 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(k) Exemption.--The Secretary shall not require the testing for 
the use of alcohol or a controlled substance of an operator of a motor 
vehicle described in section 31301(4)(A) if the vehicle--
            ``(1) is owned or controlled by an owner or operator of a 
        farm and is used solely to provide, within a 150 air mile 
        radius of the farm, not-for-hire transportation of agricultural 
        commodities and farm supplies to and from the farm; or
            ``(2) is being used to provide not-for-hire transportation 
        of property for a unit of a local government that has 
        jurisdiction over an area with a population of less than 
        7,500.''.
                                 <all>
```