alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimal regulation in systems with stochastic time samplingAn optimal control theory that accounts for stochastic variable time sampling in a distributed microprocessor based flight control system is presented. The theory is developed by using a linear process model for the airplane dynamics and the information distribution process is modeled as a variable time increment process where, at the time that information is supplied to the control effectors, the control effectors know the time of the next information update only in a stochastic sense. An optimal control problem is formulated and solved for the control law that minimizes the expected value of a quadratic cost function. The optimal cost obtained with a variable time increment Markov information update process where the control effectors know only the past information update intervals and the Markov transition mechanism is almost identical to that obtained with a known and uniform information update interval.Document ID19810004301Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMontgomery, R. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Lee, P. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategorySystems AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1743L-13507Accession Number81N12812Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810004301.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm










The Board of Directors


Tamir Biotechnology, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-166437) on Form S-1, (Nos. 333-112865 and 333-136678) on Form S-3, and (Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866) on Form S-8 of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. (formerly known as Alfacell Corporation) of our report dated November 4, 2002, with respect to the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and cash flows of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, which report appears in the July 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. Our report dated November 4, 2002, as it relates to the financial statements for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, is based on the report of other auditors who have ceased operations as to the amounts included therein for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.




Our report dated November 4, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.








/s/ KPMG LLP






Short Hills, New Jersey


October 29, 2010
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3016

To require the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General of the

United States to be consulted before the manufacture, importation, sale,

or delivery of armor piercing ammunition for the use of a governmental

entity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1996

Mr. YATES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney

General of the United States to be consulted before

the manufacture, importation, sale, or delivery of armor

piercing ammunition for the use of a governmental entity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3016 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONSULTATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE

2 TREASURY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

3 THE UNITED STATES REQUIRED BEFORE THE

4 MANUFACTURE, IMPORTATION, SALE, OR DE5 LIVERY OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION

6 FOR THE USE OF A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY.

7 Section 922(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended in each of paragraphs (7)(A) and (8)(A) by in9 serting ‘‘, but only after consultation by the manufacturer

10 or importer with the Secretary and the Attorney General

11 of the United States (in accordance with such regulations

12 as the Secretary shall prescribe) for consideration of the

13 operational necessities of such ammunition and the impact

14 upon law enforcement and public safety’’ before the semi15 colon.

Æ
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Steven ROBERTS, Relator, v. Honorable Lewis B. WHITWORTH, as Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-614.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus dismissed.
{NEED KPMG CONSENT}

Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Alcide Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-85974 and 333-00909) on Form S-8 of Alcide Corporation of our report
dated June 28, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Alcide Corporation as of May 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the May 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Alcide Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the
method of accounting for purchased goodwill and certain intangibles in fiscal year 2002.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Seattle,
Washington
August 29, 2002

45

---

QuickLinks
# C_2006143EN.01002301.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/23

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria di secondo grado di Trento lodged on 17 March 2006 — Fendt Italiana Srl v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio Dogane di Trento

(Case C-146/06)

(2006/C 143/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria di secondo grado di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fendt Italiana Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Dogane Ufficio Dogane di Trento

Defendant:

Question referred

Are the taxation arrangements in Article 62 of Legislative Decree No 504/95 compatible with Directive 2003/96/EC (1) which restructured the Community framework for the taxation of energy products where those products are used for purposes other than as motor fuel or heating fuel?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

1

---
# C_2005257EN.01001202.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/12

---

Action brought on 25 July 2005 — Friedrich Weber v Commission

(Case T-290/05)

(2005/C 257/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties:

Applicant: Friedrich Weber (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: W. Declair, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | vary the defendant's decision of 27 May 2005 so that it is obligated to grant the applicant access, in accordance with its letters of 23 April 2005 and 27 April 2005, to documents in connection with the State aid proceedings E 3/2005 concerning the financing of public-law broadcasting bodies pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. |
| --- | --- |

—

vary the defendant's decision of 27 May 2005 so that it is obligated to grant the applicant access, in accordance with its letters of 23 April 2005 and 27 April 2005, to documents in connection with the State aid proceedings E 3/2005 concerning the financing of public-law broadcasting bodies pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the contested decision, the Commission refused the applicant's request for access to documents in connection with the State aid proceedings E 3/2005 concerning the financing of public-law broadcasting bodies with reference to the third indent of Article 4(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of the openness regulation. (1)

1

The applicant claims that there is a public interest in disclosure of the documents at issue.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145 of 31.05.2001 p. 43).

1

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                  TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 EXHIBIT II


                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                   ----------------------------------------



                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                           January 31,
                                                    2 0 0 0           1 9 9 9
                                                    -------           -------

<S>                                           <C>             <C>
Basic earnings:
  Net loss                                        $ (755,873)       $ (200,357)
                                                  ----------        ----------

Shares:                                            2,141,801         2,141,801
  Warrants to consultants                                 --                --
  Employee stock options                                  --                --
  Consultant stock options                                --                --
                                                  ----------        ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                  2,141,801         2,141,801
                                                  ----------        ----------

Basic earnings per common share                   $     (.35)       $     (.09)
                                                  ==========        ==========

Diluted earnings:
  Net loss                                        $ (755,873)       $ (200,357)
                                                  ==========        ==========

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding               2,141,801         2,141,801
  Warrants to consultants                                 --                --
  Employee stock options                                  --                --
  Consultant stock options                                --                --
                                                  ----------        ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                  2,141,801         2,141,801
                                                  ----------        ----------

Diluted earnings per common share                 $     (.35)       $     (.09)
                                                  ==========        ==========


</TABLE>
No. 99-340.

#### Hossain *v.*Immigration and Naturalization Service.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2006086EN.01003203.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/32

---

Action brought on 24 January 2006 — Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg v Commission

(Case T-24/06)

(2006/C 86/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg (MABB) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Schütte, B. Immenkamp, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities (C(2005) 3903 final) of 9 November 2005 on the State aid which the Federal Republic of Germany has implemented for the introduction of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities (C(2005) 3903 final) of 9 November 2005 on the State aid which the Federal Republic of Germany has implemented for the introduction of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is challenging Commission Decision C(2005) 3903 final of 9 November 2005 on the State aid for the introduction of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg. In the contested decision the Commission stated that the aid granted to the commercial broadcasters participating in DVB-T was incompatible with the common market and ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to recover from the beneficiaries the aid which was unlawfully made available to them. The applicant is expressly referred to as an issuer of aid in the contested decision.

In support of its action the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.

First, it states that the contested decision errs in law as essential formal requirements have been infringed. The Commission has, in particular, infringed the obligation to state reasons as it has not explained comprehensively why this should be regarded as a case involving State aid.

Second, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 87 EC. On the one hand, it contends that there is no aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC. On the other hand, it claims that if there has in fact been aid, that would be compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(c) and (d).

Finally, the applicant bases its action on the fact that the contested decision infringes Article 86(2) EC since, in so far as there has been aid, that would be compatible with the common market.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3326 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3326

  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to adjust the maximum 
   hour exemption for agricultural employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 1996

  Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to adjust the maximum 
   hour exemption for agricultural employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938.

    Section 13(b)(12) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 
U.S.C. 213(b)(12)) is amended by inserting after ``water'' the 
following: ``, at least 75 percent of which is ultimately delivered''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Dempsey J. STRICKLAND, Jr.

No. 54687.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1974.

In re: Dempsey J. Strickland, Jr., applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 290 So.2d 714.

Application denied. No error in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
1

Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed September 17, 2020
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00334

- CV

____________ BLAKE ENGLISH AND TORIA ENGLISH , Appellant s V.
EX
- CENTRO GROUP, LTD.; SILKHEART, LLC; AND ROBERT SEIDENBER G , Ap pellee s
On Appeal from the 353 rd District Court

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D
- 1

- GN

- 14

- 002220



### ABATEMENT ORDER

On September 3, appellants filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal for settlement ne g otiations. The motion is grante d and we issue the following order.
The appe al is abated, treated as a clos ed case, and removed from this c ourt’s active docket until October 8, 2020 . The appeal will be reinstated on this c ourt’s2

active docket at that time, or when the parties file a moti on to d ismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The c ourt will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the c ourt may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Ju stices Wise and Bourliot

.
Home2024 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Fitrell, Troy – Republic of Seychelles – March 2024

# 									Fitrell, Troy – Republic of Seychelles – March 2024							

Certificate of Competency

March 6, 2024

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:                   Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                         Republic of Seychelles

CANDIDATE:             Troy Fitrell

Troy Fitrell, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister Counselor, currently serves as the U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Guinea.  Previously, he was the director of the Office of West African Affairs at the Department of State and, prior to that, he served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. embassies in Ethiopia and Mauritius, and as Deputy Director of the Department’s Office of Southern African Affairs.  Earlier, he was Senior Advisor to the United States Special Envoy for the Great Lakes of Africa, coordinating U.S. policy on the cross-border security, political, and economic issues in the Great Lakes region.  During his three years of senior leadership in Mauritius, he was responsible for relations with the Seychelles, then covered by the U.S. Embassy in Mauritius.  Ambassador Fitrell’s extensive experience with African affairs, combined with his demonstrated ability to build and lead teams effectively in challenging environments, make him well-qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Seychelles.

Ambassador Fitrell served as a Pearson Fellow on the staff of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.  In that position, he divided his time between Asia and Pacific issues, including sovereignty in the South China Sea, and African issues, including developments in democracy in Ethiopia and Kenya.  He also served overseas as chief of the Political Section in Portugal, Labor Attache in Guatemala, chief of the Economic Section in Zambia, and as a political and consular officer in Ghana and Denmark.

Ambassador Fitrell earned a B.A. at the University of Maryland and an M.S. at the National War College.  He speaks French, Spanish, Portuguese, Swedish and Danish.

Back to Top
#### Murray M. SALZBERG, Appellant, v. VENETIAN INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 27, 1974.

Linwood Cabot, Cabot, Scott, Wenkstern & Casteel, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ronald B. Sladon, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

*298PER CURIAM.

Our examination of the record in this cause demonstrates adequate support for the judgment under review. Accordingly, said judgment is affirmed.

WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ, and CONKLING, VIRGIL B, Associate Judge, concur.
Mail to: Secretary of State002

|MUST BE TYPEDFILING FEE: $25.00MUST SUBMIT TWO COPIES | Corporations Section1560 Broadway, Suite 200Denver, CO 80202303) 894-2251Fax (303) 894-2242 | For office use only
FILED- CUSTOMER COPYDONETTA DAVIDSONCOLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE20011223489 M$25.00SECTRETARY OF STATE11-26-2001 11:49:21
|----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Please include a typed Self-addressed envelope | ARTICLES OF AMENDMENTTO THEARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST: The name of the corporation is CAPITAL RESERVE CORPORATION

SECOND: The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted on November 19th, 2001 as prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, in the manner marked with an X below:

____ No shares have been issued or Directors Elected - Action by Incorporators

____ No shares have been issued but Directors Elected - Action by Directors

____ Such amendment was adopted by the board of directors where shares have been issued and shareholder action was not required.

_X__ Such amendment was adopted by a vote of the shareholders. The number of shares voted for the amendment was sufficient for approval.

THIRD: If changing corporate name, the new name of the corporation is ________________________________________________________________________

FOURTH: The manner, if not set forth in such amendment, in which any exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the amendment shall be effected, is as follows:

PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO

If these amendments are to have a delayed effective date, please list that date:

(Not to exceed ninety (90) days form the date of filing)

| | Signature /s/ Jacqueline R. DanforthName: Jacqueline R. DanforthTitle: President
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1650 Payment basis for lymphedema compression treatment items. ( a ) *General payment rule.* For items furnished on or after January 1, 2024, Medicare pays for lymphedema compression treatment items on the basis of 80 percent of the lesser of— ( 1 ) The actual charge for the item; or
( 2 ) The payment amount for the item, as determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Payment amounts.* The payment amounts for covered lymphedema compression treatment items paid for under this subpart are established based on one of the following: ( 1 ) If payment amounts are available from Medicaid state plans, then 120 percent of the average of the Medicaid payment amounts.
( 2 ) If payment amounts are not available from Medicaid state plans, then 100 percent of the average of average internet retail prices and payment amounts from TRICARE (Department of Defense).
( 3 ) If payment amounts are not available from Medicaid state plans or TRICARE, then 100 percent of average internet retail prices.
( c ) *Updates to payment amounts.* The payment amounts for covered lymphedema compression treatment items established in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section are increased on an annual basis beginning on January 1 of the year subsequent to the year in which the payment amounts are initially established based on the percent change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year.