alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, ex rel. Minor, *v.*Curtis et al.

*Elections*— Insufficient *or imperfect nomination papers*— Inde*pendent candidate for prosecuting attorney-*— Supplemental *papers.*

(No. 16816

Decided October 22, 1920.)

In Mandamus.

*Mr. Claude J. Minor*and *Mr. Smith W. Bennett,*for relator.

*Mr. John G. Price,*attorney general, and *Mr. B. W. Gearheart,*for respondents.

The court find upon the issue joined for the relator, Claude J. Minor, and that he is entitled to a peremptory mandamus herein.

It is therefore ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue against William J. Curtis, Lewis Engelbry, William J. O’Brien and Silas S. Pritchett, as deputy state supervisors of elections for Erie county, for the performance of the act heretofore alternatively ordered and that immediately upon the service of this writ, they do the act alternatively ordered; to-wit: that they cause to be printed upon the official ballots to be used by the electors of said Erie county, Ohio, as an independent candidate for prosecuting attorney of said county, the name of Claude J. Minor, and that none of the ballots, if any existing, on which the name of Claude J. Minor has not been printed as an independent candidate for prosecuting attorney *534of said county, shall be distributed to the election officers in any of the precincts of said county.

*Writ allowed.*

Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Wanamaker, JJ., concur.

Nichols, C. J., and Robinson, J., not participating.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Garcetti, Eric M – Republic of India – August 2021

# 									Garcetti, Eric M – Republic of India – August 2021							

Certificate of Competency

August 9, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  The Republic of India

CANDIDATE:     Eric M. Garcetti

As Mayor of the City of Los Angeles since 2013, Eric M. Garcetti led LA’s successful bid to return the summer Olympic Games to American soil for the first time in three decades.  He took early, aggressive action to effectively confront the COVID-19 pandemic, building one of the world’s largest local testing and vaccine programs, including one of the first national equity programs to address hardest-hit communities. Mr. Garcetti is the current global Chair of C40 Cities – a network of 97 of the world’s biggest cities taking bold climate action – and has led the organization’s engagement and expansion in India.  During 12 years as an Intelligence Officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve Component, he served under the Commander, Pacific Fleet and the Defense Intelligence Agency, retiring in 2017 as a Lieutenant.  Mr. Garcetti’s demonstrated leadership skills and years of experience in the Indo-Pacific region make him an excellent candidate to be U.S. Ambassador to India.

A Rhodes Scholar, Mr. Garcetti studied at Queen’s College, Oxford and the London School of Economics and Political Science, conducted fieldwork on nationalism and ethnic conflict in Eritrea and Ethiopia and published his research on multi-ethnic nationalism, insurgency, and international development.  He co-founded Climate Mayors and led more than 400 U.S. mayors to adopt the Paris Climate agreement.  Mr. Garcetti was selected as an inaugural Asia 21 Fellow of the Asia Society, and taught at Occidental College’s Department of Diplomacy and World Affairs, as well as at the University of Southern California School of International Relations.  He earned a B.A. and M.A. at Columbia University, where he was a John Jay Scholar.  He speaks fluent Spanish.

Back to Top
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. George SENTER, Relator, v. Louie B. WAINWRIGHT, Director Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
# Search Results

**

1 results.

Alternate formats:                                                            Download search results as RIS                                    ** | **CSV         |             TSV         |             Excel** | **RSS feed based on this search** | **                    JSON version of this page of results                

Page 1, results 1 - 1

Show results on a map

#### Publication Extents

                                2014 annual summary of the lower Gunnison River Basin Selenium Management Program water-quality monitoring, Colorado
NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.
                               
      Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                          Exhibit 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  Years Ended December 31,

(Thousands of Dollars)
<S>                   <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
<C>
                        1997       1996       1995       1994
1993

Net earnings          $269,450   $276,331   $267,941   $223,340
$203,297


Add:

  Fixed charges:

  Interest including
    amortization of
    debt expense       401,736    372,859    359,079    259,605
242,440
One third of rentals*   12,107     10,748     10,317      9,747
10,146

  Total fixed charges  413,843    383,607    369,396    269,352
252,586

  Provision for
    income taxes       144,082    148,096    147,873    116,900
104,228

  Total net earnings,
    fixed charges and
    income taxes -
    "Earnings"        $827,375   $808,034   $785,210   $609,592
$560,111


Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges        2.00       2.11       2.13       2.26
2.22


</TABLE>

*    One-third of rentals is deemed representative of the
interest factor.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40714

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFREDO CASAS-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:05-CR-1015

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo CasasGarcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources
- Contact Us

HomeGlobal Community Liaison Office...GCLO Outreach Resources

# 									GCLO Outreach Resources							

Global Community Liaison Office

## 								Outreach Resources 							

        -  Connect with the Global Community Liaison Office (GCLO) and get the latest updates via GCLO’s outreach resources. 

### GCLO Weekly Newsletter

This weekly newsletter compiles news and information for U.S. government employees, their family members, and Members of Household (MOH) who are serving, have served, or will be serving at U.S. Missions overseas. Click here to subscribe to the GCLO Weekly.

### GCLO Facebook Page

Get the latest updates on GCLO programs, resources, and events, along with pertinent information from other Department of State offices and external partners. We invite all in the Foreign Service community to follow GCLO’s page today. Click here to visit the GCLO Facebook page.

### GCLO YouTube Channel

View instructional videos, webinars, and GCLO program highlights on GCLO’s YouTube channel. Click here to visit the YouTube channel and become a subscriber.

### The Network

Looking for work in Washington? An email subscription service for Foreign Service family members seeking employment in the Washington, DC area. Click here to learn more about The Network.

### GCLO Publications

        - GCLO Listening Survey            - An annual survey of the Foreign Service Community conducted by GCLO 
        - GCLO Worldwide Family Member Employment Overview            - A biannual report of worldwide Family Member employment statistics collected by GCLO from more than 200 overseas posts. 
        - Bouncing Back – Transition and Re-entry Planning for the Parents of Foreign Service Youth            - Bouncing Back addresses the challenges internationally mobile Foreign Service youth face when transitioning back to the U.S. 
        - Divorce and the Foreign Service            - Getting divorced? You are not alone. This helpful guide from the Global Community Liaison Office (GCLO) provides the information and resources you will need during this sometimes difficult process. 
        - List of Bilateral Work Agreements and de facto Work Arrangements            - A list of Bilateral Work Agreements and de facto Work Arrangements with links to copies of  Treaties and Other International Acts Series  maintained by the  Office of Treaty Affairs . 

### GCLO Outreach Cards

----

GCLO Advocacy, Programs, and Services

----

Connect With GCLO

----

Community Liaison Office

----

Education And Youth

----

Expeditious Naturalization

----

Family Member Employment

----

Global Employment Initiative

----

Personal Preparedness

----

GCLO Separation And Divorce In The Foreign Service

----

Unaccompanied but not alone, GCLO is with You

----

CLO Confidentiality Policy Poster

----

GCLO Confidentiality Policy Poster

----

GCLO Business Card

Tags

Global Community Liaison Office

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Richard E. BARRETT, Appellant, v. Sheila BARRETT, Appellee.

No. 73-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2005222EN.01000402.xml

| 9.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3729 — EDF/AEM/Edison)

(2005/C 222/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3729. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3729. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1092 Revision of reopened decision. ( a ) *Revision based on new evidence.* If a reopened decision is to be revised on the basis of new evidence that was not included in the record of that decision, the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board— ( 1 ) Notifies the parties of the proposed revision; and
( 2 ) Unless the parties waive their right to hearing or appearance— ( i ) Grants a hearing in the case of an ALJ revision; and
( ii ) Grants opportunity to appear in the case of a Board revision.
( b ) *Basis for revised decision and right to review.* ( 1 ) If a revised decision is necessary, the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board, as appropriate, renders it on the basis of the entire record.
( 2 ) If the decision is revised by an ALJ, the Departmental Appeals Board may review that revised decision at the request of either party or on its own motion.
# C_2006103EN.01003101.xml

| 29.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4020 — Wingas/ZGHG/JV)

(2006/C 103/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4020. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4020. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005281EN.01002502.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/25

---

Action brought on 23 August 2005 — Maccanti v European Economic and Social Committee

(Case T-320/05)

(2005/C 281/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Sandra Maccanti (Woluwé-St-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendants: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendants:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 11 May 2005 (notified on 13 May 2005) rejecting the applicant's complaint of 22 March 2005 challenging her grading when her contract as a member of the temporary staff, previously entered into on 7 July 2004, was renewed on 23 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 11 May 2005 (notified on 13 May 2005) rejecting the applicant's complaint of 22 March 2005 challenging her grading when her contract as a member of the temporary staff, previously entered into on 7 July 2004, was renewed on 23 December 2004;

| — | So far as may be necessary, also annul the decision setting the grade in the contract extending her employment as a member of the temporary staff, signed on 23 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as may be necessary, also annul the decision setting the grade in the contract extending her employment as a member of the temporary staff, signed on 23 December 2004;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was recruited as a member of the temporary staff of the European Economic and Social Committee for an initial period of six months beginning on 1 January 2004. That contract was then renewed for the period from 7 July 2004 to 31 December 2004. Upon that renewal she was graded at Grade B*4, step 2, passing then upon an advance in step in December 2004 to Grade B*4/3.

On 23 December 2004, the applicant was invited to sign a new contract renewing her engagement until 31 December 2006. In the new contract, she was graded at Grade B*3/1.

By the present action, the applicant challenges that less favourable grading. She alleges an infringement of Articles 8 and 15 of the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities. In her view, it is clear from those provisions that the renewal of a contract of a member of the temporary staff is merely an extension in time of its effects and that, therefore, the grading of that member cannot be changed on the occasion of that renewal.

The applicant further alleges an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination, submitting that some of the members of the defendant's temporary staff had their contracts renewed keeping their original grading, and infringement of her legitimate expectations.

---
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. Roland CALHEIROS, Relator, v. Honorable Dan SATIN, Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  __/s/ Clifford L. Neuman_______ Clifford L. Neuman President May 16, 2011  _/s/ Todd Huss___________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer May 16, 2011
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 18, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00319

- CV

Karen Bass and Lynn Smith, in their capacity as Successor Co

- Trustees on behalf of the Amended and Restated George E. Bogle and Nancy T. Bogle Joint Revocable Trust, dated March 2, 2021 , Appellant s

v.

George Michael Bogle and Katherine Leigh Bogle Leavitt , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

--

OPI NION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on May 26, 2023 . Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ a rguments, the Court holds t hat there was reversible error in portions

of the court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court af firm s the p ro bat e court ’ s f i nal judgme nt to the

e xtent it decla r ed that the p urported trus t amendment ex ecuted in October 2022 by George

Michael Bog l e on behalf of his parents was v oid a nd invalid and awarded fees and e xpens es to

the c ourt

- appointed g uardian ad li tem and the r eceiver

. The Court also affirm s t he final

judgm ent to the exten t tha t it de clar ed that the prov isions in the 2022 T rust Agreem e nt and its

amendments that changed the dis tr i bution of t he trust assets on Nancy T . Bogle ’ s death we re

void and in vali d

. The Court reverse s the remainder of the final judgment and remand s t he ca seto the probate cour t for fu rt her procee dings c onsistent wi t h t hi s Court ’s opinion. Each party shall

bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2005281EN.01001101.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/11

---

Action brought on 19 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-343/05)

(2005/C 281/20)

Language of the case: Finnish

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 19 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by L. Pignataro Nolin and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that:
  by not ensuring that Ahvenanmaa (Åland) has transposed into its legislation Article 8a of Directive 89/622/EEC, which was added by Directive 92/41/EC and is contained in Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC, (1) and
  by not enduring that the prohibition in the abovementioned Community provisions of marketing nuuska (oral tobacco) is complied with on vessels registered in Finland,
  the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and Directive 2001/37/EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that:

by not ensuring that Ahvenanmaa (Åland) has transposed into its legislation Article 8a of Directive 89/622/EEC, which was added by Directive 92/41/EC and is contained in Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC, (1) and

1

by not enduring that the prohibition in the abovementioned Community provisions of marketing nuuska (oral tobacco) is complied with on vessels registered in Finland,

the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and Directive 2001/37/EC;

| 2. | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The list in Annex II to Directive 2001/37/EC mentions Directive 92/41/EEC and the time-limit for transposing its provisions into national legislation was 1 July 1992. In the case of Finland, the time-limit for transposing the provisions into national legislation based on Finland's accession was 1 January 1995, even though it must be stated that compliance with the directive was already mandatory for Finland from 1 January 1994 under the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

---

(1)  Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products, OJ L 194 of 18.7.2001, p. 26.

1

---
§ 405.2472 Beneficiary appeals. A beneficiary may request a hearing by an intermediary (subject to the limitations and conditions set forth in subpart H of this part) if: ( a ) The beneficiary is dissatisfied with a MAC's determination denying a request for payment made on his or her behalf by a RHC or FQHC;
( b ) The beneficiary is dissatisfied with the amount of payment; or
( c ) The beneficiary believes the request for payment is not being acted upon with reasonable promptness.
[43 FR 8261, Mar. 1, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 57 FR 24978, June 12, 1992; 79 FR 25480, May 2, 2014]