alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Company's Annual Report on Form l0-K for the fiscal year ending January 3,      2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date      hereof (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mason N. Carter          |
|------------------------------|
| Mason      N. Carter         |
| Chairman,      President and |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
| April      20, 2009          |

----
#### Jack Myren STEINBORN, Appellant, v. William R. ABBOTT et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 29, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Richard O. Faria certify that: 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 28, 2006		/s/ Richard O. Faria
# C_2006074EN.01001201.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/12

---

Action brought on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Slovak Republic

(Case C-69/06)

(2006/C 74/22)

Language of the case: Slovak

An action against the Slovak Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by N. Yerrell and Tomáš Kukal, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 76/914/EEC of 16 December 1976 on the minimum level of training for some road transport drivers, (1) or by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 76/914/EEC of 16 December 1976 on the minimum level of training for some road transport drivers, (1) or by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for adopting the measures to transpose the directive expired on 1 May 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 357 of 29.12.1976, p. 36.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparative performance of HgCdTe photodiodes for heterodyne applicationPhotodiodes used as photomixers in heterodyne applications display quantum efficiencies that are lower than the dc quantum efficiency of the device. Measurement techniques used to obtain dc quantum efficiencies, midband heterodyne quantum efficiencies, and frequency roll off characteristics are described. Measurement results for two HgCdTe photodiodes are given and discussed. It is recommended that photodiodes used in heterodyne applications be tested for heterodyne quantum efficiency over the frequency band of interest for the particular application.Document ID19800025175Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKowitz, H. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1980Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1745L-14019Meeting InformationMeeting: Heterodyne Systems and Technol. Conf.Location: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: March 25, 1980End Date: March 27, 1980Accession Number80N33683Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-61-53-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800025175.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006060EN.01003101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/31

---

Action brought on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-47/06)

(2006/C 60/60)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for asylum seekers, (1) or, in any event, by not informing the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for asylum seekers, (1) or, in any event, by not informing the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2003/9/EC expired on 6 February 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 31 of 06.02.2003, p. 18.

1

---
Request for Information FAA-2015-0173 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Marlow: 

This letter is in regards to your amendment request to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 

333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No.

FAA­2015­0173.

The amendment requests to operate the SHOTOVER U1. With full payload, this unmanned aircraft 

(UA) has a maximum take­off weight of 66 lbs. If the petitioner’s intent is to operate this UA above the 

weight of 55 lbs the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the additional information not 

addressed in the SHOTOVER manual to process your petition.

x A detailed description of the aircraft design and configuration for the SHOTOVER U1 UAS 

focusing on the UAS features and flight characteristics to include, but not limited to:

o Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery 

equipment if applicable

o Operational history with supporting statistics; particularly where Alaska Aerial Media was 

the principal operator

o Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS

o Lessons learned from repairs and alterations performed during operations to include 

design changes and fixes due to operational failure(s)

o Details of any injuries or property damage resulting from flight/ground operations

o Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly­away, loss of control, etc.

x Copies of manuals, photographs, videos/telemetry may be provided as support

x Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety with unmanned aircraft in 

excess of 55 lbs.

Please submit the additional information (non­proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov .

Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking 

number along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information 

electronically via e­mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.

If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 

12/05/2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 12:40 PM 

To: ryan@akaerialmedia.com

Request for Information FAA-2015-0173 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Not... 11/21/2016
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: National Estuaries Restoration Inventory.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0479.
    Form Number(s): NA.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Number of Respondents: 32.
    Average Hours per Response: Entry of new projects into inventory 
database, 4 hours; updates to existing projects, 2 hours.
    Burden Hours: 103.
    Needs and Uses: Collection of estuary habitat restoration project 
information (e.g., location, habitat type, goals, status, monitoring 
information) will be undertaken in order to populate a restoration 
project database mandated by the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000. The 
database is intended to provide information to improve restoration 
methods, provide the basis for required reports to Congress, and track 
estuary habitat acreage restored. Estuary habitat restoration project 
information will be submitted by habitat restoration project managers 
through an interactive Web site, and will be accessible to the public 
via the Internet for data queries and project reports.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8febc7f6e1eae4cfebe0eca1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3915243338361d39323e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cd8fdeaf5f8c3cef3efe8f7f9eedcf3f1feb2f9f3ecb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93d7f2e5faf7ccc1fce0e7f8f6e1d3fcfef1bdf6fce3bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-21970 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2469
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2469
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    32
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (34)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (34)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (34)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 312 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 312

 To prohibit funding to carry out the Appalachian Regional Development 
                              Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Klug introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and, in addition, to the 
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit funding to carry out the Appalachian Regional Development 
                              Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That no funds may be appropriated to carry out the Appalachian Regional 
Development Act of 1965 for any fiscal year beginning after September 
30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006086EN.01003901.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/39

---

Action brought on 13 February 2006 — Galileo Lebensmittel v Commission

(Case T-46/06)

(2006/C 86/77)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Galileo Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG (Trierweiler, Germany) (represented by: K. Bott, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decision to reserve the domain galileo.eu and order the defendant to allow the registry issuing eu. Top Level Domains (EURid) to register freely the domain Galileo.eu. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision to reserve the domain galileo.eu and order the defendant to allow the registry issuing eu. Top Level Domains (EURid) to register freely the domain Galileo.eu.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant applied for registration of the domain ‘galileo.eu’ as an eu. Top Level Domain. The Registry, EURid, refused that registration on the ground that the domain applied for is reserved for the defendant.

In support of its application the applicant alleges infringement of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 (1). In addition, it claims that its rights under the second paragraph of Article 2, the first subparagraph of Article 10(1) and the third subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation No 874/2004 have been infringed.

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This document is published to identify institutions of higher education that are ineligible for contracts and grants by reason of a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the institution prohibits or in effect prevents military recruiter access to the campus, students on campus or student directory information. It also implements the requirements set forth in section 983 of title 10, United States Code, and 32 CFR Part 216. The institutions of higher education so identified are: Vermont Law School, South Royalton, Vermont; William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota. 

# ADDRESSES:

Director for Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Colonel Rose Jourdan, (703) 695-5529. 

Dated: January 27, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-2200 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P