alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 175 (Friday, September 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical 
Library and Informatics Review Committee, November 5, 2009, 8 a.m. to 
November 6, 2009, 2 p.m., National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 
Board Room, 2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2009, 74 FR 36726.
    The meeting will end on November 6, 2009 at 9 a.m. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: August 28, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-21766 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         466,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  829,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,066,823
<PP&E>                                         690,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 597,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,436,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,976,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,235,674
<COMMON>                                        74,950
<OTHER-SE>                                     745,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,436,188
<SALES>                                      2,221,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,221,618
<CGS>                                        1,446,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,004,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (50,124)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                    97,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00004-CV

SCOTT TRUITT, Appellant

V.

JANET HATFIELD, AS AN INDIVIDUAL;

JANET HATFIELD, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

TRUST OF DELORIS HATFIELD; AND 

JANET HATFIELD, AS THE EXECUTOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF DELORIS 

HATFIELD, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the Probate Court

of Denton County (PR-2018-01016-01)

December 2, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellant Scott Truitt shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
# C_2006102EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2006

(2006/C 102/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2414 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4602 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6958 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3328 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5814 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 93,03 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,796 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5761 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,445 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8737 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,475 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,58 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,395 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,648 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6546 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4043 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6267 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9751 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9702 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 173 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6833 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9566 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2901 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 928,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5063 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,218 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,011 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,717 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2414

JPY

Japanese yen

142,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4602

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6958

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3328

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5814

ISK

Iceland króna

93,03

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,796

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5761

CZK

Czech koruna

28,445

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8737

RON

Romanian leu

3,475

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,58

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,395

TRY

Turkish lira

1,648

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6546

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4043

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6267

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9751

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9702

KRW

South Korean won

1 173

ZAR

South African rand

7,6833

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9566

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2901

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 928,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5063

PHP

Philippine peso

64,218

RUB

Russian rouble

34,011

THB

Thai baht

46,717

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
41015.

#### PIONEER HOMEOWNERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOGAN.

Decided January 6, 1965.

*888
      *Reinhardt, Ireland & Whitley, Glenn Whitley,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. D. Knight, E. R. Smith, Sr.,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

It is the contention of the defendant insurance company that the trial court erred in overruling its general demurrer for the reasons that a policy of credit life insurance is wholly for the benefit of the creditor beneficiary and the sole right of action to recover on such policy is therefore in the creditor beneficiary to the exclusion of the insured debtor or anyone claiming under him.

This contention is without merit. Under the provisions of the Georgia Insurance Code of 1960 (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 743; *Code Ann. Ch.*66-33) regulating credit life insurance, as such provisions have been interpreted by the Supreme Court in *Betts v. Brown,*219 Ga. 782 (136 SE2d 365), a policy of credit life insurance insures the life of the debtor and not the debt; and such insurance is not wholly for the benefit of the creditor beneficiary sincé it is expressly provided in *Code Ann.*§ 56-3306 (2) that “wherever the amount of insurance may exceed the unpaid indebtedness . . . any such excess shall be payable to a beneficiary, other than the creditor, named by the debtor or to his estate.”

The case of *Murray v. Life Ins. Co. of Ga.,*107 Ga. App. 545 (130 SE2d 767), which is relied upon by the defendant as authority for its contention, is not applicable here since the credit life insurance contract dealt with in that case “was entered into prior to the effective date of the Georgia Insurance Code, Ga. L. 1960, supra. Hence, what was there held as to the insured’s lack of interest in that contract and consequent inability to sue the insurer for breach thereof was not with the aid of the above mentioned Insurance Code provisions, which recognize the interest of the insured in the credit life insurance contract.” *Betts v. Brown,*219 Ga. 782, 787, supra.

*889The policy sued upon in this case was executed after the effective date of the Georgia Insurance Code of I960, supra; and in construing this policy under the provisions of that Act, it is clear that the plaintiff as the administratrix of the insured debtor’s estate was the party “equitably entitled” to payment under the terms of the policy as the indebtedness to the bank had been paid by her out of the estate of the insured debtor. Accordingly, the plaintiff, being entitled to the proceeds of the policy, was authorized to bring this suit to recover upon the refusal of the defendant insurance company to pay, and her petition was not subject to general demurrer as contended by the defendant. .

The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s sole special demurrer to the petition for the reason that the grounds of the demurrer were too general and incomplete in form. *Cawthon v.*Williams, 107 Ga. App. 886 (3) (132 SE2d 214).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell,*P. *J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
32








PRESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 FORM 10-Q  JUNE
30, 2008




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Presidential Associates I Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





Date:
      August 14, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Eggert
      DagbjartssonEggert
      DagbjartssonChief
      Executive Officer
  Date:
      August 14, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/ Andrew
      PragueAndrew
      PragueChief
      Financial Officer
§ 419.80 Basis and scope of this subpart. ( a ) *Basis.* The provisions in this subpart are issued under the authority of section 1833(t)(2)(F) of the Act, which authorizes the Secretary to develop a method for controlling unnecessary increases in the volume of covered hospital outpatient department services.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart specifies the process and requirements for prior authorization for certain hospital outpatient department services as a condition of Medicare payment.
# C_2005271EN.01001501.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/15

---

Action brought on 24 August 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the United Kingdom

(Case C-323/05)

(2005/C 271/28)

Language of the case: English

An action against the United Kingdom was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 24 August 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Antonio Aresu and Nicola Yerrell, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | find that the United Kingdom has failed its obligations under the EC Treaty by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (1) and/or by failing to inform the Commission thereof; |
| --- | --- |

1.

find that the United Kingdom has failed its obligations under the EC Treaty by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (1) and/or by failing to inform the Commission thereof;

1

| 2. | condemn the United Kingdom to bear the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

2.

condemn the United Kingdom to bear the costs of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 15 January 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 11, 15.01.2002, p. 4

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Biruta

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Biruta							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 1, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Vincent Biruta today. They discussed regional security issues of mutual interest, including how to arrest the deteriorating situation in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and how to promote stability in the Central African Republic.

Deputy Secretary Sherman underscored U.S. support for regional mediation on eastern DRC and dialogue led by Angola and the East African Community and stressed the importance of action by all parties to end military conflict and accelerate the political process.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRwanda

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 951,084
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          3,820,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (46,677)
<INVENTORY>                                            5,792,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       12,052,380
<PP&E>                                                 21,552,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (8,211,974)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         31,459,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,769,156
<BONDS>                                                5,562,933
<COMMON>                                               83,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                             22,552,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           31,459,236
<SALES>                                                24,271,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       24,271,640
<CGS>                                                  11,665,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          7,047,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (1,467,715)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     251,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        6,774,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                           2,453,188
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    4,321,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           4,321,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.51


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6.1



 Exhibit 10.6.1 
  
 THE NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 DATED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

  
 Section 7.2 of Article VII of the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. is amended and restated as follows: 
  
 7.2 Time of Payment. The payment of a Participant’s benefit under this Article VII shall commence (or be paid, as the case may be) within the ninety day period beginning on the Participant’s SERP
Benefit Commencement Date. The determination of when, during such ninety day period, such benefit shall actually commence to be paid shall be determined by the SERP Committee in its sole and absolute discretion; provided, however, that
if such Participant is a member of the SERP Committee, such Participant shall in no event have any involvement in such determination. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 7.2, the date on which a Participant’s benefit under
this Article VII shall commence (or be paid, as the case may be) shall in all events be delayed until six months and one day following such Participant’s Termination of Employment, if such delay is necessary to avoid the imposition of any tax,
penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code.
<PAGE>   1

                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              SIX MONTHS ENDED                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                NOVEMBER 30                         NOVEMBER 30
                                                           1997             1996              1997              1996
                                                           ----             ----              ----              ----
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

Primary                                                43,993,301        40,658,752        43,993,301        41,243,888
Fully diluted                                          43,993,301        40,658,752        43,993,301        41,243,888
                                                    
                                                    
Primary:                                            
                                                    
Net loss                                               (8,934,637)       (3,505,828)       (4,247,438)       (2,541,683)
Paid and cumulative undeclared preferred            
stock dividends                                          (305,775)         (235,825)         (152,887)         (110,825)
Implied dividend equal to intrinsic value of        
preferred stock conversion feature                     (1,187,211)                           (731,092)
Net loss applicable to common stock                   (10,427,624)       (3,741,653)       (5,131,418)       (2,652,508)
Net loss per share                                          (0.24)            (0.09)            (0.12)            (0.06)
</TABLE>

For the above years, earnings per share, assuming full dilution, has not been
presented since the effect would be antidiluting.
Exhibit10.34.1


 


List of Omitted Management Continuity
Agreements


 


1.               Management
Continuity Agreement between Thomas E. O’Hern and the Company.


 


2.               Management
Continuity Agreement between Richard A. Bayer and the Company.


 


3.               Management
Continuity Agreement between Arthur C. Coppola and the Company.


 


4.               Management
Continuity Agreement between Edward E. Coppola and the Company.


 


5.               Management
Continuity Agreement between Tony Grossi and the Company.
ACCEPTED

06-15-00052-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

11/19/2015 11:47:06 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/19/2015 11:47:06 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
#### § 417.598 Annual enrollment reconciliation.

CMS's payment to an HMO or CMP may be subject to an enrollment reconciliation at least annually. CMS conducts this reconciliation as necessary to ensure that the payments made do not exceed or fall short of the appropriate per capita rate of payment for each Medicare enrollee of the HMO or CMP during the contract period. The HMO or CMP must submit any information or reports required by CMS to conduct the reconciliation.

[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38080, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 46233, Sept. 6, 1995]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131914 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131914 

 COA: 270623 

Wayne CC: 98-002006 

DONALD SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk