alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Estonia National Day

# 									Estonia National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 24, 2024

On behalf of the United States, I extend my warmest congratulations to the people of Estonia as they celebrate their National Day.

Estonia’s unwavering commitment to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law continues to inspire us all. As we mark this significant occasion, we commend Estonia for its leadership in fostering innovation, economic prosperity, and security on the regional and global stage. The enduring friendship between the United States and Estonia is rooted in shared values and a commitment to freedom and democracy. The United States is proud to work hand-in-hand with Estonia to strengthen NATO’s eastern flank, counter Russia’s aggression, and steadfastly support Ukraine.

On this special day, we celebrate Estonia’s rich history, vibrant culture, and the resilience of its people. I look forward to many decades of continued partnership and friendship as Allies that will benefit our citizens and deepen our bilateral relationship. May the coming years bring continued prosperity, peace, and success to Estonia and its citizens.

Congratulations on this happy occasion.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyEstoniaHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
# C_2005270EN.01004701.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/47

---

AGIS work programme 2006

(2005/C 270/19)

The complete 2006 AGIS work programme and call for proposals is published on the JLS website at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/funding/agis/funding_agis_en.htm.

Deadline for presentation of proposals: 27 January 2006.

---
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|      | 
|Name: |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | August 8, 2006
# C_2006060EN.01005602.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/56

---

Action brought on 23 December 2005 — Merglova v Commission

(Case F-129/05)

(2006/C 60/104)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Eva Merglova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the action admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action admissible;

| — | Annul the Commission's decision of 15 September 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision of 15 September 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | Pronounce the reclassification of the applicant in Grade C3 or C2, with retrospective effect from 1 May 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

Pronounce the reclassification of the applicant in Grade C3 or C2, with retrospective effect from 1 May 2004;

| — | In the alternative, order the Commission to recognise the applicant as eligible for promotion to Grade C3 or C2 in the next promotions year and order the Commission to make compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant through not having been classed in Grade C2 or C3 as from 1 May 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, order the Commission to recognise the applicant as eligible for promotion to Grade C3 or C2 in the next promotions year and order the Commission to make compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant through not having been classed in Grade C2 or C3 as from 1 May 2004;

| — | In any event, order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

In any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official recruited after the reform of the Staff Regulations but entered on the reserve list of a competition published before that reform, pleads unlawfulness of Article 2 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, pursuant to which she was classed in Grade C1, Step 2.

In support of her objection of illegality, the applicant claims infringement of the principle of equivalence between the old and the new career structure, laid down by Article 6 of the Staff Regulations. The applicant argues that her career has been slowed by her being classed in Grade C1.

The applicant also considers that she has been the victim of an infringement of the principle of equal treatment in relation to her colleagues in Grade C4 or C5 who were promoted before 1 May 2004.

Finally, the applicant argues infringement of the legitimate expectation she was given that the new career structure would not involve deterioration of her working conditions, infringement of her acquired rights, and misuse of powers.

---
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Cellular Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Dean Antonis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  September 5, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, Interim President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Clifford L. Neuman Clifford L. Neuman Interim President November 14, 2006  /s/ Todd Huss Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2006
# C_2006096EN.01000502.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln by order of that court of 19 January 2006 in Planzer Luxembourg Sàrl v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

(Case C-73/06)

(2006/C 96/08)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Köln of 19 January 2006, received at the Court Registry on 8 February 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Planzer Luxembourg Sàrl and Bundeszentralamt für Steuern on the following questions:

| 1. | Does an undertaking's certificate according to the specimen form in Annex B to the Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country (1) have binding effect or create an irrefutable assumption that the undertaking is established in the State issuing the certificate? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does an undertaking's certificate according to the specimen form in Annex B to the Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country (1) have binding effect or create an irrefutable assumption that the undertaking is established in the State issuing the certificate?

1

| 2. | If the first question should be answered in the negative:
  Should the term 'business' in Article 1(1) of the Thirteenth Directive be construed as meaning the place where the company has its registered office
  or should it mean the place where management decisions are taken
  or is the crucial factor the place where decisions vital to normal everyday operations are taken? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question should be answered in the negative:

Should the term 'business' in Article 1(1) of the Thirteenth Directive be construed as meaning the place where the company has its registered office

or should it mean the place where management decisions are taken

or is the crucial factor the place where decisions vital to normal everyday operations are taken?

---

(1)  OJ L 331, p. 11

1

---
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Croatia (21-105) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Information

# 									Croatia (21-105) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Information							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

January 5, 2021

Defense: Security of Information

Signed at Zagreb January 5, 2021; entered into force January 5, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [640 KB]

Tags

CroatiaDefenseTreaties

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarterly period ended August 28, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Nicholas Konidaris                           |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Nicholas Konidaris                               |
| President, Chief Executive  Officer and Director |
| October 1, 2004                             |

 

----
# C_2006086EN.01000901.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 9 February 2006

in Case C-473/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie in Plumex v Young Sports NV (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation - Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 - Articles 4 to 11 and 14 - Service of judicial documents - Service through agencies - Service by post - Relationship between the methods of transmission and service - Precedence - Time-limit for an appeal)

(2006/C 86/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-473/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Articles 68 EC and 234 EC from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium), made by decision of 22 October 2004, received at the Court on 9 November 2004, in the proceedings between Plumex and Young Sports NV — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, S. von Bahr and A. Borg Barthet, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 February 2006, in which it ruled:

| 1. | Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that it does not establish any hierarchy between the method of transmission and service under Articles 4 to 11 thereof and that under Article 14 thereof and, consequently, it is possible to serve a judicial document by one or other or both of those methods. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that it does not establish any hierarchy between the method of transmission and service under Articles 4 to 11 thereof and that under Article 14 thereof and, consequently, it is possible to serve a judicial document by one or other or both of those methods.

| 2. | Regulation No 1348/2000 must be interpreted as meaning that, where transmission and service are effected by both the method under Articles 4 to 11 thereof and the method under Article 14 thereof, in order to determine vis-à-vis the person on whom service is effected the point from which time starts to run for the purposes of a procedural time-limit linked to effecting service, reference must be made to the date of the first service validly effected. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Regulation No 1348/2000 must be interpreted as meaning that, where transmission and service are effected by both the method under Articles 4 to 11 thereof and the method under Article 14 thereof, in order to determine vis-à-vis the person on whom service is effected the point from which time starts to run for the purposes of a procedural time-limit linked to effecting service, reference must be made to the date of the first service validly effected.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.01.2005.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpectral flame radiance from a tubular-can combustorAn experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of fuel type, fuel-air ratio, and inlet-air pressure on the spectral flame radiance emanating from a JT8D can combustor. Spectral radiance measurements from 1.55 to 5.5 micrometers of wavelength were recorded and analyzed to determine soot concentration and flame temperature at various axial locations in the combustor. Two fuels differing in volatility, viscosity, and chemical composition were used in this investigation.Document ID19810010595Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsClaus, R. W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1981Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1722E-509Accession Number81N19121Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-32-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810010595.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006131EN.01002502.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France)) — Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie v Gillan Beach Ltd

(Case C-114/05) (1)

1

(VAT - Place of taxable transactions - Fiscal connection - Services provided in connection with boat shows)

(2006/C 131/45)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État (France)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie

Applicant:

Defendant: Gillan Beach Ltd

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Counseil d'Etat (France) — Interpretation of Article 9(2) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388 of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Determination of relevant place for tax purposes — Supply of services carried out in relation to boat shows.

Operative part of the judgment

The first indent of Article 9(2)(c) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that an inclusive service provided by an organiser to exhibitors at a fair or in an exhibition hall falls within the category of services referred to in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 115,14.05.2005.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:



(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the
Registrant).



(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and



 the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | May 16, 2005
§ 525.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 525.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 525.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 525.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 525.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.