alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006136EN.01000401.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/4

---

MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF TUESDAY, 22 NOVEMBER 2005

MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF TUESDAY, 22 NOVEMBER 2005

(2006/C 136/02)

(The sitting opened at 9.10 a.m.)

(The sitting opened at 9.10 a.m.)

IN THE CHAIR: Mrs HAY WEBSTER

HAY WEBSTER

Co-President

Co-President

1.   Substitutes

The Co-President announced the following substitutes: van den Berg (for Bullman), Zaleski (for Langendries), Schröder (for Coelho), Goebbels (for Rosati) and Czarnecki (for Kozlik).

2.   Report by Louis-Claude Nyassa (Cameroon) and Nirj Deva, on behalf of the Committee on Economic Development, Finance and Trade, on agricultural and mining commodities (ACP-EU 3765/05/fin.)

Mrs Lulling, on behalf of Mr Deva, co-rapporteur, and Mr Nyassa, co-rapporteur, introduced the report.

Speakers: Lulling (for Deva, co-rapporteur), Nyassa, co-rapporteur (Cameroon), Ramotar (Guyana), Cornillet, Sebetela (Botswana), Aubert, Dlamini (Swaziland), Top (Guinea), Coye (Jamaica), Zaleski, Cavuilati (Fiji), Jardim Fernandes, Deerpalsing (Mauritius), McAvan, Nyan-Alaboson (The Gambia), Akpovi (Benin), Lehideux, Sithole (Mozambique), Conteh (Sierra Leone), François (Saint Lucia), van den Berg, Osei-Prempeh (Ghana), Malin (European Commission), Pleguezuelos Aguilar and Assarid Imbarcaouane (Mali).

Mrs Lulling and Mr Nyassa (Cameroon) wound up the debate.

The Co-Presidents would send a letter to the President-in-Office of the EU Council (Development) expressing the Assembly's dissatisfaction at the reform of the EC sugar regime and its concerns about the EU's legal commitment under the Sugar Protocol and the Action Plan.

3.   Urgent topic No 2: Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH)

Speakers: Bowis, Sithole (South Africa), Scheele, Sebetela (Botswana), Ek, Dlamini (Swaziland), Schnellhardt, Nambahu (Namibia), McAvan, Prescod (Barbados), Mayer, Goebbels, Masilo-Motsamai (Lesotho) and Malin (European Commission).

Mr Bowis and Mr Sithole (South Africa) wound up the debate.

(The sitting closed at 12.20 p.m.)

(The sitting closed at 12.20 p.m.)

Sharon HAY WEBSTER and

Glenys KINNOCK

Co-Presidents

Sir John KAPUTIN and

Dietmar NICKEL

Co-Secretaries-General

---
# Norway

141 items

        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Norway	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on U.S.-Norwegian Joint Air Operations and Arctic Strategy	  March 5, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Norwegian Foreign Minister Søreide	  March 2, 2021 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Twenty-second Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee Record of Meeting	  November 16, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Norway	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Norway	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Norway	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Norway	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Norway	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Norway	  March 11, 2020 

previous page1…910111213…15next page

Back to Top
# C_2006096EN.01002201.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/22

---

Action brought on 17 February 2006 — Marly v OHIM

(Case T -57/06)

(2006/C 96/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Marly SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Mouffe, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Erdal Gesellschaft m.b.H. (Hallein, Austria)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM in so far as it upholds the opposition by the proprietor of the word mark ‘TOFIX’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM in so far as it upholds the opposition by the proprietor of the word mark ‘TOFIX’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs, including expenses necessarily incurred during proceedings before the Board of Appeal, incurred by the party initiating the proceedings and as calculated in the decision under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, including expenses necessarily incurred during proceedings before the Board of Appeal, incurred by the party initiating the proceedings and as calculated in the decision under appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘TOPIX’ for goods in Class 3 (application No 2 326 072)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Erdal Gesellschaft m.b.H.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the international word mark ‘TOPIX’ for goods in Classes 3 and 4

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in respect of all the disputed goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 in that there is a visual and conceptual difference between the conflicting trade marks and a very great difference between the goods to which the two trade marks relate.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2006060EN.01003306.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-163/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/72)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

By order of 10 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-163/05: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 132 of 28.05.2005.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, Ken L. Joines, Vice President, Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer ofFirst Equity Properties, Inc. (“FEPI”), certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FEPI; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13(a)-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for FEPI and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to insure that material information relating to FEPI andits consolidated subsidiaries is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly for the periods presented in thisquarterly report;  (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of FEPI’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in the report any change in FEPI’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during FEPI’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect FEPI’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to FEPI’s auditors and the audit committee ofFEPI’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect FEPI’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in FEPI’s internalcontrols.        Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Ken L. Joines   Vice President, Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer
# Colombia

307 items

        -    Report  		Colombia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (16-1121) – Law Enforcement Agreement Concerning the Sharing of Forfeited Proceeds and Instrumentalities of Crime	  November 21, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Lacey Act Amendment Programming (Summary)	  July 28, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Evaluating the Effectiveness of PRM-Supported Programs to Build the Capacity of Colombian Municipal Authorities to Assist Internally Displaced Persons [PDF]	  April 8, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (16-310.1) – Extension and Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding of March 15, 2006 Concerning Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation	  March 10, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (14-916) – Agreement on Antitrust Cooperation	  September 16, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (14-430) – Agreement for the Exchange of Tax Information	  April 30, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (13-628) – Environmental Cooperation Agreement	  June 28, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (13-220.1) – Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  February 20, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Colombia (12-415.2) – Agreement on Phytosanitary Measures for Importation of United States Paddy Rice	  April 15, 2012 

previous page1…2728293031next page

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

######  Forest Service

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), [as reauthorized as part of Pub. L. 110-343] and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 22, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held at the Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on State Highway 7, approximately one-quarter mile West of FM 227 in Houston County, Texas. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 8 p.m. A public comment period will begin at 7:45 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gerald Lawrence, Jr., Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest, 18551 State Hwy. 7 E., Kennard, TX 75847:                         *Telephone:*                         936-655-2299 ext. 225 or e-mail at:                         *glawrence@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC proposes projects and funding to the Secretary of Agriculture under Section 203 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000, (as reauthorized as part of Pub. L. 110-343). The purpose of the September 22, 2009 meeting is to primarily discuss the Groveton-Phase I Projects proposed by the Forest Service, and new projects proposed by the RAC. These meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time, as identified above, for persons wishing to comment. The time for individual oral comments may be limited.

Gerald Lawrence, Jr.,

Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest RAC.

[FR Doc. E9-21785 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3149

To permit the approval and administration of drugs and devices to patients

who are terminally ill.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1996

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. PAYNE of Virginia,

Mr. JACOBS, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr.

BILBRAY, and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To permit the approval and administration of drugs and

devices to patients who are terminally ill.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terminally Ill Access

5 to Treatment Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. DRUGS AND DEVICES FOR TERMINALLY ILL.

7 (a) APPROVAL.—The Secretary of Health and

8 Human Services shall approve, for purposes of treating

9 the terminally ill only, drugs and devices which have not
2

•HR 3149 IH

1 received final approval from the Food and Drug Adminis2 tration and which have not been shown to be unsafe.

3 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—It is not illegal for a health

4 care practitioner to administer a drug or device approved

5 under subsection (a) to a terminally ill patient if the prac6 titioner—

7 (1) has given the patient sufficient notice that

8 the drug or device has not received final approval

9 from the Food and Drug Administration and should

10 be considered experimental; and

11 (2) has received from such patient or the pa12 tient’s legal representative written approval to ad13 minister such drug or device.

14 (c) UNSAFE DRUG OR DEVICE.—If a health care

15 practitioner administers, in accordance with subsection

16 (b), a drug or device approved under subsection (a) and

17 determines the drug is unsafe and has caused acute harm

18 to the practitioner’s terminally ill patient, the practitioner

19 shall cease the administration of the drug or device and

20 shall report to the Secretary of Health and Human Serv21 ices the practitioner’s findings of acute harm.

22 (d) NOTICE.—The Secretary of Health and Human

23 Services shall give timely public notice of—

24 (1) the benefits derived from a drug or device

25 approved under subsection (a); and
3

•HR 3149 IH

1 (2) any harm caused by a drug or device ap2 proved under subsection (a).

3 (e) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

4 (1) the term ‘‘terminally ill’’ means an individ5 ual who has been certified by a physician as having

6 an illness or physical condition which can reasonably

7 be expected to result in death in 24 months or less

8 after the date of certification; and

9 (2) the term ‘‘physician’’ has the same meaning

10 as is given that term by section 1861(r)(1) of the

11 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C 1395x(r)(1)).

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1

KPMG
LLP

|(logo) | 4200 Wells Fargo Center
|------ | -----------------------
|       | 90 S. Seventh Street   
|       | Minneapolis, MN  55402 



INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS’ CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Financial, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-54934, 333-33096, and 333-66089) on Form S-3
of Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated January 16,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholder's equity for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K
of the Company.

\s\
KPMG LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
March 15, 2001
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132817 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132817 COA: 265141 Wayne CC: 05-004400-01 JONATHON SAMUEL MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-64705 and No. 333-15725) on Form S-3 of Berger Holdings, Ltd.
of our report dated February 13, 1988 relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Berger Holdings, Ltd. as of December 31, 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity and cash flows and
related financial statement schedules for the year ended December 31, 1997,
which reports are incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1997 annual
report Form 10-K of Berger Holdings, Ltd.


/S/GOLDENBERG ROSENTHAL, LLP
GOLDENBERG ROSENTHAL, LLP


Jenkintown, Pennsylvania
March 20, 2000


                                      -35-
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3438

___________

Elsie Mayard, *

*

Appellant. * On Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District of

* Minnesota.

Dennis Meyer, * 

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 16, 1998

Filed: November 25, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This case has survived from our prior opinion Mayard v. Hopwood, 105 F.3d

1226 (8th Cir. 1997), which permitted the continuance of Ms. Mayard's civil action

against police officer Dennis Meyer for violating her constitutional rights by using

excessive force while transporting Mayard in a police vehicle to police headquarters

in St. Paul. The district court heard the excessive force case, submitted the issues to

the jury, and entered a judgment of dismissal in conformity with the jury verdict for the

defendant. On this appeal, Mayard asserts error in the district court’s refusal to permit

her to amend her complaint to assert additional claims for other violations of her

constitutional rights by police. Additionally, she asserts error in the trial judge's ruling
-2-

excluding her evidence relating to alleged improper conduct by the police which

occurred immediately prior to her arrest and the transporting of her to police

headquarters via a police vehicle. 

Both rulings fall within the area of discretion by the district judge. The record

does not establish any abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 January 17, 2007
    
    /s/William C. Niegsch, Jr.William C. Niegsch, Jr.,
Executive Vice President; Chief Financial
Officer Max & Ermas Restaurants Inc.