alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

             SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

     1.   Effective January 1, 2009, each non-employee director ("Non-Employee
          Director") of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the "Company") shall be
          paid an annual cash retainer of $50,000.

     2.   Effective January 1, 2009, the chairperson of each of the Audit
          Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating & Governance
          Committee shall be paid an annual cash retainer of $25,000, $15,000
          and $10,000, respectively.

     3.   Effective January 1, 2009, each Non-Employee Director shall be paid
          $1,500 cash for each Board meeting attended in person; $1,500 cash for
          each committee meeting attended in person; $1,500 cash for each Audit
          Committee meeting attended telephonically; $1,000 cash for each Board
          meeting attended telephonically; and $1,000 cash for each committee
          meeting, other than an Audit Committee meeting, attended
          telephonically.

     5.   Commencing in 2009 and pursuant to the Company's 2003 Incentive Stock
          Plan (the "2003 Plan"), an annual restricted stock award of 10,000
          shares (the "Annual RSU Award") shall be awarded to each Non-Employee
          Director. If the Annual RSU Award has a value of less than $90,000, as
          such value is determined for financial statement purposes in
          accordance with FAS 123(R), then, the difference between such value
          and $90,000 shall be paid to the Non-Employee Director in cash.

     6.   Effective December 20, 2008, prorated for 2008, the non-executive
          chairperson of the Board shall be paid an annual cash retainer of
          $225,000, in lieu of all other Non-Employee Director cash and equity
          compensation. Furthermore, he and his immediate family shall be
          entitled to receive health benefits under the health benefit plans
          provided to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries as such plans
          exist for the benefit of all employees from time to time, except that
          such covered individuals shall not be required to make any payments
          for participation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,234,261
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,445,147
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            11,720,075
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 52,622,166
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    224,863,441
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,865,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             328,791,782
<DEPOSITS>                                 267,255,216
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,636,559
<LONG-TERM>                                 28,168,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,263,745
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,468,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             328,791,782
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,897,682
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,457,361
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               525,207
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            24,880,250
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          10,466,506
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,796,983
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       13,083,267
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  532,900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (13,824)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,023,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,366,620
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,144,133
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,144,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.72
<LOANS-NON>                                    368,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   178,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,550,242
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  261,060
<RECOVERIES>                                    43,396
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,865,478
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,865,478
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
----

(2006/C 36/75)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 22, 28.1.2006

Past publications

OJ C 10, 14.1.2006

OJ C 330, 24.12.2005

OJ C 315, 10.12.2005

OJ C 296, 26.11.2005

OJ C 281, 12.11.2005

OJ C 271, 29.10.2005

These texts are available on:

----
#### Philip J. BERNSTEIN, Appellant, v. COMMON MARKETS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-1169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 17, 1974.

Brian R. Hersh, Miami, for appellant.

Walter A. Apfelbaum, Henry T. Courtney, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

*273PER CURIAM.

The appellee having confessed error in the entry of the protective order under review in this cause, it is thereupon ordered and adjudged that said protective order, dated July 3, 1974, be and the same is hereby reversed.

Reversed.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert K. Bench, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
November 5,
2009                                                    /s/  Robert K.
Bench


Robert K.
Bench


Chief
Executive Officer









This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.132 Medical nutrition therapy. ( a ) *Conditions for coverage of MNT* services. Medicare Part B pays for MNT services provided by a registered dietitian or nutrition professional as defined in § 410.134 when the beneficiary is referred for the service by a physician.
( b ) *Limitations on coverage of MNT services.* ( 1 ) MNT services based on a diagnosis of renal disease as described in this subpart are not covered for beneficiaries receiving maintenance dialysis for which payment is made under section 1881 of the Act.
( 2 ) A beneficiary may only receive the maximum number of hours covered under the DSMT benefit for both DSMT and MNT during the initial DSMT training period unless additional hours are determined to be medically necessary under the national coverage determination process.
( 3 ) In years when the beneficiary is eligible for MNT and follow-up DSMT, the beneficiary may only receive the maximum number of hours covered under MNT unless additional hours are determined to be medically necessary under the national coverage determination process.
( 4 ) If a beneficiary has both diabetes and renal disease, the beneficiary may only receive the maximum number of hours covered under the renal MNT benefit in one episode of care unless he or she is receiving initial DSMT services, in which case the beneficiary would receive whichever is greater.
( 5 ) An exception to the maximum number of hours in paragraphs (b)(2), (3), and (4) of this section may be made when a physician determines that there is a change of diagnosis, medical condition, or treatment regimen related to diabetes or renal disease that requires a change in MNT during an episode of care.
( c ) Referrals . Referral may only be made by a physician when the beneficiary has been diagnosed with diabetes or renal disease as defined in this subpart with documentation noted by a referring physician in the beneficiary's medical record.
[66 FR 55331, Nov. 1, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 66400, Nov. 27, 2007; 86 FR 65667, Nov. 19, 2021]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Energy Independence Authority Act of 1975

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					,	Proxmire, William					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Energy Independence Authority Act of 1975 : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2532, April 12, 13, and 14; and May 10, 1976*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										April 12, 13, and 14; and May 10, 1976,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/217,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### James GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 10, 1974.

*458Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Roy S. Wood, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and GREEN, ROBERT A., Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried upon an information charging robbery and aggravated assault and was adjudged guilty on November 26, 1973. On March 11, 1974, he filed in this court a petition for habeas corpus. That petition has been accepted as a notice of appeal for a delayed appeal. See Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.

The defendant here urges that the trial court failed to give him a full sanity hearing under CrPR 3.210 as to the issue of his competency to stand trial. This record reveals, however, that during the proceedings before the court the appellant with his private counsel stipulated that the only issue for the court to determine was his competency at the time of the commission of the alleged act. We hold that no error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Rusnak, state and attest that:



|(1) | I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the periodic report) containing financial statements
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for
the periods presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                                                 
|----- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Patrick J. Rusnak                                                           
|Title |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | August 8, 2007
#### Gary William SAYERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1948.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1978.

Gary William Sayers, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[52 C. Cls., 201, 288 ; 53 C. Cls., 81; 251 U. S. 342.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal, the judgment was *modified and*affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

Under the income tax act of 1913, sec. G, (a), (b), as under the corporation excise tax act of 1909, the income taxable to a domestic corporation is limited to income “ received ” during the year.

Under these statutes premiums collected in any year by the agents of an insurance company but not paid over to the treasurer of the company are part of its income “ received ” in that year. Where the Government imposed and collected the tax on all premiums written during the year, the company, claiming refund of part as erroneously assessed on premiums not received, must show what premiums were received during the year.

Reserves which are required by State insurance departments in the exercise of statutory authority, are “ required by law ” within the meaning of the excise and income tax acts, *supra,*where they provide that net additions, required by law to be made within the year to reserve funds, may be deducted from gross, in determining net income.

The term “ reserve funds,” as used in these acts, *held*to include an “ unearned premium reserve,” to meet future liabilities on policies; a “ liability reserve,” to satisfy claims indefinite in amount and as to time of payment, but accrued, on liability and workmen’s compensation policies; and a “ reserve for *510loss claims,” accrued on other policies; but not to include funds required by State authority to be maintained to meet ordinary running expenses, such as taxes, salaries, reinsurance, and unpaid brokerage.

If an insurance company in one year makes an overestimate of reserve requirements and so an excessive deduction from gross income, *semble,*that such excess may be treated, under these tax ac s, as income of the year in which it is subsequently released to the general uses of the company.

But amounts once deducted from gross income and added to reserves, under these acts, can be treated by the Government as income of a subsequent year for the purpose of computing the tax only where it can be clearly shown that subsequent business conditions have released them to the free beneficial use of the company in a real, and not in a mere bookkeeping sense.

A claim for refund of money paid with original returns made under the above-mentioned tax acts is barred if not presented to the commissioner, as directed by Rev. Stats., sec. 3226, and sued on in the Court of Claims within the two-year limitation of see. 3227; and these requirements are not postponed or superseded as to such payments by the facts that the original returns were amended and the assessments increased and the original payments credited upon the increased assessments by the action of the commissioner. *Cheatham*v. *United States,*92 U. S., 85, distinguished. Act of September 8, 1916, c. 463, sec. 14, 39 Stat., 772, *held*inapplicable.

Mr. Justice Clarke

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 12, 1920.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Discussions with Mexican Officials on Migration at the Department of State

# 									Discussions with Mexican Officials on Migration at the Department of State							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

January 20, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken hosted Mexican Foreign Secretary Alicia Bárcena yesterday at the Department of State to follow up on migration commitments made on December 27 in response to the invitation of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, White House Homeland Security Advisor Liz Sherwood-Randall, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and USAID Deputy Administrator Isobel Coleman joined Secretary Blinken for the meeting.

Foreign Secretary Bárcena was joined by Defense Secretary Luis Crescencio Sandoval González; Secretary of the Navy Admiral Rafael Ojeda Duran; Secretary of Public Security Rosa Icela Rodríguez Velazquez; Mexican Ambassador to the United States Esteban Moctezuma Barragán; Félix Arturo Medina, Undersecretary of Human Rights, Population and Migration, SEGOB; Roberto Velasco, Head of the Unit for North America, SRE;  Commissioner for the National Migration Institute Francisco Garduño Yaez; and Alejandro Celorio, Legal Counselor, SRE.

During the meeting, Secretary Blinken and the U.S. delegation noted that our coordinated efforts with Mexico are demonstrating positive results at our shared border.  They discussed the positive impact of efforts to increase migration controls on bus and train routes, crack down on criminal smuggling networks, and scale up repatriations for those who do not have a legal basis to remain in our countries.

Secretary Blinken highlighted the peaceful transfer of power in Guatemala as one of the most significant developments in the region since the last meeting.  In close collaboration with the Government of Mexico, the United States stands ready to support the people of Guatemala and their new government on a wide range of issues including economic development and hemispheric migration management.

U.S. and Mexican officials also discussed their bilateral efforts to counter human smuggling and arms trafficking.  In addition, they reaffirmed the importance of further expanding lawful pathways and work opportunities, including between our two countries.

Migration is a hemispheric challenge.  The United States is committed to work hand in hand with Mexico and countries across the region to address the root causes of migration and advance economic opportunities in the spirit of Los Angeles Declaration for Migration and Protection.

The two governments committed to continue their strong cooperation on migration, including in senior leader discussions on the margins of the Trilateral Fentanyl Committee meeting in Mexico City in early February.

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsMexicoMigrationOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Tongan Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Siaosi Sovaleni and Foreign Minister Fekitamoeloa ‘Utoikamanu

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Tongan Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Siaosi Sovaleni and Foreign Minister Fekitamoeloa ‘Utoikamanu							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

August 5, 2022

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Tongan Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Siaosi Sovaleni and Foreign Minister Fekitamoeloa ‘Utoikamanu in Nuku’alofa, Tonga, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations and discuss the process to establish a U.S. embassy on Nuku’alofa as the next milestone in expanding bilateral relations. The visit came just days after Tonga reopened its borders for international travel. Deputy Secretary Sherman, Prime Minister Sovaleni, and Foreign Minister ‘Utoikamanu also discussed expanding U.S.-Tongan cooperation in a range of areas, including humanitarian relief, public health assistance, combating climate change, and regional security issues. The Deputy Secretary and Prime Minister participated in a signing ceremony for a U.S. grant award of $100,000 to Tonga’s Ministry of Meteorology, Energy, Information, Disaster Management, Environment, Climate Change and Communications (MEIDECC). The grant, which reaffirms the United States’ commitment to Tonga and is one of 10 climate grants that will be issued worldwide in 2022 by the Department of State, will aid in the repair and rehabilitation of solar-powered freezer systems on Tonga’s outer islands that were damaged by the January volcanic eruption and tsunami.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonTonga

Back to Top