alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Samuel L. Erwin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. (this Report) for the period ended December 31, 2010;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    SAMUEL L. ERWIN                                           
|Samuel L. Erwin
Chief Executive Officer
Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.



Dated: March 9, 2011
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131914 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131914 COA: 270623 Wayne CC: 98-002006 DONALD SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
# C_2006032EN.01003601.xml

| 8.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/36

---

Amendment to the notice of invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 166 of 7 July 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 166 of 7 July 2005

(2006/C 32/13)

Page 54, the text of point 2, under heading I ‘Subject’, reads as follows:

‘The total quantity in respect of which there may be fixed a maximum export refund as provided in Article 4(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 (1), is approximately 7 000 000 tonnes.’.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

1

---
Motion Granted; Vacated and Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 21, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00637-CV

DYNA TORQUE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D/B/A DYNA TORQUE 

TECHNOLOGIES AND ANDREW THOMAS SCHERFENBERG, 

Appellants

V.

FORWARD FINANCING. LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1163002

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court today considered the parties’ agreed motion to vacate the trial 

court’s judgment and dismiss the case with prejudice. The motion is granted as 

follows.

Without regard to the merits, the trial court’s judgment is vacated and the 

case is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e); see Jester Venture, Ltd. v. Nash, No. 
2

01-06-00512-CV, 2006 WL 2042358, *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 17, 

2006, no pet.) (mem. op.); Internet America, Inc. v. Carradine, 106 S.W.3d 906, 

907 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.) (vacating the trial court’s judgment and 

dismissing the case based upon the joint agreed motion for disposition pursuant to 

settlement agreement and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 43.2(e)); Young 

Materials Corp. v. Smith, 4 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.) (vacating 

the trial court’s judgment and dismissing the case based upon the parties’ agreed 

motion to dismiss the entire cause and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 43.2(e)).

Appellants shall pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal. Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
EXHIBIT 3.1.7

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

SECRETARY OF STATE

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

Pursuant to Section 33-10-106 of the 1976 South Carolina Code of Laws, as amended, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

1. The name of the Corporation is Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

2. Date of Incorporation: 5/13/83

3. Agents Name and Address: L. Leon Patterson, 101 W.
Main Street, Laurens, SC 29360-2939

4. On May 19, 2009, the Corporation adopted the following Amendment (s) of its Articles of
Incorporation:

Article Four of the Corporations Articles of Incorporation, as amended, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:

The Corporation is authorized to issue one class of shares to be designated common. The total number of
shares that the Corporation is authorized to issue is twenty-five million (25,000,000) shares, and the par value of each such share is $5.00.

5. The amendment was adopted by shareholder action. At the date of adoption of the Amendment, the number of outstanding shares of each voting group entitled to vote separately on the Amendment, and the vote of such shares was:



|             |  |                            |  |                                         |  |                                          |  |                                         
|------------ |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Voting Group |  | Number ofOutstandingShares |  | Number of VotesEntitled to be tobe Cast |  | Number of VotesRepresented atthe meeting |  | Number of UndisputedSharesFor or
Against
|Common Stock |  | 6,487,630                  |  | 6,487,630                               |  | 5,647,029                                |  | (For) 5,191,694                         
|             |  |                            |  |                                         |  |                                          |  | (Against) 455,335                       

6. The
effective date of these Articles of Amendment shall be the date of acceptance for filing by the Secretary of State (See Section 33-1-230(b) of 1976 South Carolina Code of Laws, as amended).



|                   |  |  |  |                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 29, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Leon Patterson                      
|                   |  |  |  | Name: L. Leon Patterson                    
|                   |  |  |  | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005182EN.01001801.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 2 June 2005

in Case C-454/04: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/55/EC - Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 182/33)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-454/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. O'Reilly and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 28 October 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18. 12. 2004.

1

---
EPA Registration Number

74530

- 38

Vol. II
# C_2006062EN.01000502.xml

| 15.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4081 — Fujitsu Siemens Computer Holding/Siemens Business Services)

(2006/C 62/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4081. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4081. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2912

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of

1968 to require a 33 percent reduction in certain assistance to a State

under such title unless public safety officers who retire as a result

of injuries sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health insurance benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1996

Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. LIPINSKI,

and Mr. FROST) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe

Streets Act of 1968 to require a 33 percent reduction

in certain assistance to a State under such title unless

public safety officers who retire as a result of injuries

sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health

insurance benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Alu-O’Hara Public Safety

5 Officers Health Benefits Act’’.
2

•HR 2912 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

2 Part L of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and

3 Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at the

4 end the following:

5 ‘‘SEC. 1204A. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

6 ‘‘A grant made under this title that would otherwise

7 be made available to a State shall be reduced by 33 per8 cent unless a public safety officer who retires or is sepa9 rated from service due to an injury suffered as the direct

10 and proximate result of a personal injury sustained in the

11 line of duty (during an emergency situation, the investiga12 tion of a criminal act, or a hot pursuit as such terms are

13 defined by State law) continues after such injury to receive

14 the same or better level of health insurance benefits that

15 are paid at the time of such injuries by the State or unit

16 of local government within the State that employed such

17 officer.’’.

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect

20 beginning on October 1 of the first fiscal year beginning

21 after the last day of the 2-year period beginning on the

22 date on the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2006074EN.01001502.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/15

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 January 2006 — Regione Marche v Commission

(Case T-107/03) (1)

1

(Integrated Mediterranean Programme (IMP) for the Marche Region (Italy) - Conclusion of financial assistance - Ineligible expenditure - Action for annulment - Absence of legal basis - Legitimate expectation - Failure to state grounds )

(2006/C 74/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Regione Marche (represented by: A. Pappalardo, M. Merola and D. Domenicucci, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. de March and L. Flynn, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Application for

Annulment of the Commission decision of 18 December 2002 contained in a letter to the Italian Government by which the Commission announced that it was concluding Community financial assistance granted under the Integrated Mediterranean Programme (IMP) for the Marche Region (Italy)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the applicant, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 124, 24.5.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 10.30 Second Amendment to Salary Continuation Agreement for Daniel Warfel  SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE OMEGA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT  DATED MARCH 1, 2000 FOR DANIEL WARFEL  THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (Second Amendment) is made and entered into this 18th day of December, 2006, by and between OMEGA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, located in State College, Pennsylvania (the Bank), and DANIEL WARFEL (the Officer).  WITNESSTH:  WHEREAS, on March 1, 2000, the Bank and the Officer entered into a deferred compensation agreement titled Omega Bank, National Association Salary Continuation Agreement, (Agreement),  and on December 23, 2003, the Bank and the Officer entered into the First Amendment to the Omega Bank, National Association Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement (First Amendment) which amended the Agreement; and  WHEREAS, the Bank and the Officer desire to further amend the Agreement through this Second Amendment.  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Bank and the Officer agree as follows:  1.
        Section 1.8 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
  1.8.
        Normal Retirement Age means the Officers 62nd birthday.
  2.           Section 2.3.1 is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:  The liability shall be calculated assuming that the Officer accrues his Normal Retirement Benefit ratably over the period beginning on the Effective Date and ending on his Normal Retirement Age.  However, effective as of January 1, 2006, the difference between the Officers accrued benefit as of December 31, 2005 and the Officers projected accrued benefit at Normal Retirement Age shall accrue ratably over the period beginning on January 1, 2006 and ending on his Normal Retirement Age.  3.
        A new Section 8.11 is hereby added to the Agreement which shall read as follows:
  8.11Code Section 409A Matters.  Code Section 409A shall only apply to that portion of the Officers benefit that was not earned and vested prior to January 1, 2005.  The parties intend that the increased accruals that result from the change in the Normal Retirement Age to age 62 as of January 1, 2006 shall not be treated as a material modification so as to affect the pre-January 1, 2005 accruals and that such increased accruals shall be subject to Code Section 409A.  4.
        This Second Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2006.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Officer and the Bank have executed this Second Amendment on the date set forth above.  OFFICER:
      /s/ Daniel Warfel
      
      
      DANIEL WARFEL
    
    BANK: 
      OMEGA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
      By:              /s/
      David B. Lee
             
             Print Name:        David
      B. Lee
                                  
             Print Title:          Chairman
                                    40
# C_2006109EN.01000101.xml

| 9.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 May 2006

(2006/C 109/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2756 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2985 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5581 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7865 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5752 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,238 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,51 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8315 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4609 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,313 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6865 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6515 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4137 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8874 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0067 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0002 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 183,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7081 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2137 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2748 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 142,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,583 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,451 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5450 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,822 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2756

JPY

Japanese yen

141,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68460

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2985

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5581

ISK

Iceland króna

91,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7865

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5752

CZK

Czech koruna

28,238

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,51

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8315

RON

Romanian leu

3,4609

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,313

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6865

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6515

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4137

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8874

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0067

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0002

KRW

South Korean won

1 183,50

ZAR

South African rand

7,7081

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2137

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2748

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 142,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,583

PHP

Philippine peso

65,451

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5450

THB

Thai baht

47,822

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Amendment to Management Pension Plan effective January 1, 2009



 Exhibit(10)(iii)(A)(17.17) 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CINCINNATI BELL MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN 
 The Cincinnati Bell Management Pension Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2009 and in order to exclude
employees hired or rehired on or after January 1, 2009 from being entitled to participate in the Plan, by adding a new paragraph (l) reading as follows to the end of Subsection 2.1.9 of the Plan. 
 (l) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) above, if a person becomes an Employee on any date after December 31, 2008
(whether as a new hire or a rehire) after not having been an Employee on the immediately preceding date, then he shall not in any event be considered a “Covered Employee” at any time on or after such post-December 31, 2008 date on
which he so becomes an Employee, even if he would be deemed to have become a Covered Employee during such time were the provisions of this paragraph (l) ignored. 
 IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN CHANGE, the Plan’s sponsor, Cincinnati Bell Inc., has caused its name to be subscribed to this Plan amendment. 
  

			
	CINCINNATI BELL INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Christopher J. Wilson
	Title:	 	V.P. General Counsel & Secretary
	Date:
# C_2005219EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2005

(2005/C 219/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2483 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4561 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3124 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5436 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 77,18 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8270 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5729 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,140 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4997 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,47 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,265 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6630 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6271 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4865 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6970 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7619 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0908 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 279,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8718 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1004 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 913,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,702 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,248 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,2250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,303 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2483

JPY

Japanese yen

136,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4561

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3124

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5436

ISK

Iceland króna

77,18

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8270

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5729

CZK

Czech koruna

29,140

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9275

RON

Romanian leu

3,4997

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,47

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,265

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6630

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6271

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4865

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6970

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7619

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0908

KRW

South Korean won

1 279,91

ZAR

South African rand

7,8718

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1004

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 913,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,702

PHP

Philippine peso

70,248

RUB

Russian rouble

35,2250

THB

Thai baht

51,303

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---