alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006049EN.01000101.xml

| 28.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 February 2006

(2006/C 49/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1852 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4598 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4440 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5637 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,62 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,340 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7680 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4995 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,271 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5610 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6072 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3590 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1957 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7984 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9234 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 148,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,2971 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5314 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 945,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,401 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,583 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,3360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,517 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1852

JPY

Japanese yen

137,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4598

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4440

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5637

ISK

Iceland króna

78,62

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

28,340

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7680

RON

Romanian leu

3,4995

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,271

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5610

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6072

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3590

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1957

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7984

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9234

KRW

South Korean won

1 148,28

ZAR

South African rand

7,2971

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5314

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 945,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,401

PHP

Philippine peso

61,583

RUB

Russian rouble

33,3360

THB

Thai baht

46,517

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 3 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. LARRY LECO BEVERLY,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-1040 (D.C. No. 97-CR-44-D) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. The defendant Larry Leco Beverly was convicted after a jury trial of distributing cocaine and possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute it, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §2

841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Mr. Beverly argues for the first time on appeal that his conviction should be vacated because the government presented testimony from an informant to whom it had promised that it would seek a downward departure at sentencing in exchange for his cooperation. Mr. Beverly adds that the government provided the informant with approximately $525 in cash in order to make controlled drug buys. According to Mr. Beverly, the government’s offers violated 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2). We recently rejected this argument in United States v. Singleton , No. 97-3178, 1999 WL 6469 (10th Cir. Jan. 8, 1999) (en banc). We there concluded that “section 201(c)(2) was not intended to apply to the United States or its attorneys.” Id. at *5. Singleton controls here, and, as a result, we conclude that the government’s use of the informant’s testimony did not violate 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court, Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
# C_2005318EN.01000701.xml

| 14.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3997 — Sun Capital/Sara Lee)

(2005/C 318/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3997. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3997. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WAYNE A. GRAHAM,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-16422

D.C. No. 3:06-CV-07313-CRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Wayne A. Graham appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss.

Graham contends that the Board of Prison Term’s 2005 decision to deny him

parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due

FILED

APR 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-16422

process rights. After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) is required to challenge the denial of parole. 

See Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Now

the Supreme Court has held that the only federal right at issue in the parole context

is procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not

whether the state court decided the case correctly. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131

S.Ct. 859, 863 (2011) (per curiam). Because Graham raises no procedural

challenges regarding his parole hearing, a COA cannot issue, and we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

Further, because Graham has not has made a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify his remaining claims. Id.

DISMISSED.
#### § 586.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
§ 405.900 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* This subpart is based on the following provisions of the Act: ( 1 ) Section 1869(a) through (e) and (g) of the Act.
( 2 ) Section 1862(b)(2)(B)(viii) of the Act.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart establishes the requirements for appeals of initial determinations for benefits under Part A or Part B of Medicare, including the following: ( 1 ) The initial determination of whether an individual is entitled to benefits under Part A or Part B. (Regulations governing reconsiderations of these initial determinations are at 20 CFR, part 404, subpart J).
( 2 ) The initial determination of the amount of benefits available to an individual under Part A or Part B.
( 3 ) Any other initial determination relating to a claim for benefits under Part A or Part B, including an initial determination made by a quality improvement organization under section 1154(a)(2) of the Act or by an entity under contract with the Secretary (other than a contract under section 1852 of the Act) to administer provisions of titles XVIII or XI of the Act.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 10617, Feb. 27, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3285 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3285

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the authority of the 
  Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish research corporations at 
         medical centers in the Veterans Health Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 1996

Mr. Montgomery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the authority of the 
  Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish research corporations at 
         medical centers in the Veterans Health Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS RESEARCH CORPORATIONS.

    (a) Authority.--Section 7368 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking out ``December 31, 1992'' and inserting in lieu 
thereof ``December 31, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006107EN.01000502.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4152 — Jacobs Holding/Adecco)

(2006/C 107/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4152. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4152. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# CA2005290EN.01002101.xml

| 23.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 290/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 290/21

---

Recruitment of an internal auditor — Permanent post — A*9

(2005/C 290 A/03)

The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is an Agency of the European Union. It provides information on and analysis of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. As the European Union's reference centre for vocational education and training, Cedefop provides services for the European Commission, the European Union Member States and the social partners as well as for the associated countries of Norway and Iceland. The Candidate Countries are also associated with its activities. Cedefop is based in Thessaloniki, northern Greece.

Cedefop is seeking to recruit an internal auditor. The vacancy notice can be downloaded from our website http://www.cedefop.eu.int.

A detailed curriculum vitae (preferably European format), certificates, recommendation letters and a cover note should be sent by registered post to the following address:

| Cedefop |
| --- |
| European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training |
| c/o J. Kiorpelidou |
| Ref.: 4312/273 |
| PO Box 22427 - Finikas |
| GR- 55102 Thessaloniki |

Cedefop

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

c/o J. Kiorpelidou

Ref.: 4312/273

PO Box 22427 - Finikas

GR- 55102 Thessaloniki

The closing date for applications is 20 January 2006 (date of post registration).

---
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.231 Adjustment for wages. ( a ) CMS adjusts the labor-related portion of the base rate to account for geographic differences in the area wage levels using an appropriate wage index (established by CMS) which reflects the relative level of hospital wages and wage-related costs in the geographic area in which the ESRD facility is located.
( b ) The application of the wage index is made on the basis of the location of the ESRD facility in an urban or rural area as defined in this paragraph (b). ( 1 ) *Urban area* means a Metropolitan Statistical Area or a Metropolitan division (in the case where a Metropolitan Statistical Area is divided into Metropolitan Divisions), as defined by OMB.
( 2 ) *Rural area* means any area outside an urban area.
( c ) Beginning January 1, 2023, CMS applies a cap on decreases to the wage index, such that the wage index applied to an ESRD facility is not less than 95 percent of the wage index applied to that ESRD facility in the prior calendar year.
( d ) Beginning January 1, 2023, CMS applies a floor of 0.6000 to the wage index, such that the wage index applied to an ESRD facility is not less than 0.6000.
[75 FR 49200, Aug. 12, 2010, as amended at 87 FR 67302, Nov. 7, 2022]
#### § 416.130 Publication of revised payment methodologies.

Whenever CMS proposes to revise the payment rate for ASCs, CMS publishes a notice in the Federal Register describing the revision. The notice also explains the basis on which the rates were established. After reviewing public comments, CMS publishes a notice establishing the rates authorized by this section. In setting these rates, CMS may adopt reasonable classifications of facilities and may establish different rates for different types of surgical procedures.

[47 FR 34094, Aug. 5, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 8844, Mar. 1, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2871 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2871

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
       connecting waters in trade with Canada for the vessel ARK.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1996

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
       connecting waters in trade with Canada for the vessel ARK.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and 
sections 12106 and 12107 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and on 
the Great Lakes and their tributary and connecting waters in trade with 
Canada for the vessel ARK (United States official number 912726).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006060EN.01005801.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/58

---

(2006/C 60/106)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 48, 25.2.2006

OJ C 48, 25.2.2006

Past publications

OJ C 36, 11.2.2006

OJ C 22, 28.1.2006

OJ C 10, 14.1.2006

OJ C 330, 24.12.2005

OJ C 315, 10.12.2005

OJ C 296, 26.11.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 319 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 319

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing disclosure 
of classified information by Federal officers and employees a criminal 
                                offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing disclosure 
of classified information by Federal officers and employees a criminal 
                                offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Security and Classified 
Information Protection Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. SECTION 798 AMENDMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 798 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Whoever, being or having been an officer or employee of the 
Federal Government, knowingly discloses, communicates, furnishes, 
transmits, publishes, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized 
person, any classified information, document, or material to which such 
person had access in the course of that Federal Government office or 
employment, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 
20 years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 798 of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``subsection (a)'' and 
        inserting ``subsections (a) and (b)''; and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) (c), and (d) as 
        subsections (c) and (d), respectively.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2006022EN.01001002.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/10

---

Removal from the register of Case C-109/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 22/19)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

By order of 11 October 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-109/05: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

---

(1)  OJ C 132 of 28.5.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         237,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               266,162
<PP&E>                                       1,799,378
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,259,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 805,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     805,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   805,976
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,189
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   124,486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>