alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


State Energy Advisory Board; Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a Board Meeting of the State Energy 
Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463;, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: November 10-12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: North Carolina State University, Dorothy and Roy Park Alumni 
Center, 2450 Alumni Drive, Centennial Campus, Raleigh, NC 27606.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Burch, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, Office of Commercialization and Project Management, Golden 
Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, 
CO 80401, Telephone 303-275-4801.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Discuss ways the State Energy Advisory Committee 
can continue to support the Department of Energy's (DOE) 
commercialization and deployment efforts, consider potential 
collaborative activities with State Energy Programs in order to 
facilitate renewable energy advancement, find ways to encourage energy 
efficiency market transformation, and update members on routine 
business matters affecting the Board.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gary Burch at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must be 
received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will be 
made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB web site, http://www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 4, 2009.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-21847 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.521 Effective date of new significant regulatory requirements.

CMS will not implement, other than at the beginning of a calendar year, requirements under this part that impose a new significant cost or burden on MA organizations or plans, unless a different effective date is required by statute.

[68 FR 50858, Aug. 22, 2003]
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF HANNIS T. BOURGEOIS, LLP
                    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






We consent to the use of our Report of Independent  Registered Public Accounting
Firm dated January 24, 2006 on the consolidated  financial statements of Britton
& Koontz Capital  Corporation and  Subsidiaries for the years ended December 31,
2005,  2004 and 2003,  to be included in its Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the
fiscal year ended  December  31,  2005 filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


/s/ Hannis T. Bourgeois, LLP
-----------------------------
Hannis T. Bourgeois, LLP
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
February 24, 2006
# C_2006102EN.01001201.xml

| 28.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4085 — Arcelor/OYAK/Erdemir)

(2006/C 102/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4085. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4085. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3249 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3249

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to 
    develop domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of 
       minerals from the Nation's seabed, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3249

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to 
    develop domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of 
       minerals from the Nation's seabed, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 2(a) of the Mining 
and Mineral Resources Research Institute Act of 1984 (30 U.S.C. 
1222(a)) is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
``There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not more than 
$1,800,000 for each of the fiscal years after fiscal year 1996 to be 
made available by the Secretary to an institute or institutes 
experienced in investigating the continental shelf regions of the 
United States, the deep seabed and near shore environments of islands, 
and the Arctic and cold water regions as a source for nonfuel minerals. 
Such funds are to be used by the institute or institutes to assist in 
developing domestic technological capabilities required for the 
location of, and the efficient and environmentally sound recovery of, 
minerals (other than oil and gas) from the Nation's shallow and deep 
seabed.''.
    (b) Short Title.--Section 11 of such Act (30 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 11. SHORT TITLE.

    ``This Act may be cited as the `Mining and Mineral Resources 
Institutes Act'.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 23.6 What are the criteria for determining the entities to which National Health Service Corps personnel will be assigned? ( a ) The Secretary may, upon approving an application for the assignment of personnel and after entering into an agreement with an applicant under § 23.7, assign National Health Service Corps personnel to provide health services in or to a health manpower shortage area.
( b ) In assigning National Health Service Corps personnel to serve in a health manpower shortage area, the Secretary will seek to assign personnel who have those characteristics which will increase the probability of their remaining to serve in the health manpower shortage area upon completion of the period of assignment. In addition, the Secretary will apply a weighted-value system in which the first factor listed below is assigned the greatest weight and the second, and third factors are assigned lesser weights in descending order: ( 1 ) The need of the health manpower shortage area as determined by criteria established under section 332(b) of the Act.
( 2 ) The willingness of individuals, government agencies, or health entities within the health manpower shortage area to cooperate with the National Health Service Corps in providing effective health services.
( 3 ) The comments of health professional societies serving the health manpower shortage area.
[45 FR 12790, Feb. 27, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 31948, Sept. 8, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1026 Disqualification of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) An ALJ may not conduct a hearing in a case in which he or she is prejudiced or partial to the affected party or has any interest in the matter pending for decision.
( b ) A party that objects to the ALJ designated to conduct the hearing must give notice of its objections at the earliest opportunity.
( c ) The ALJ will consider the objections and decide whether to withdraw or proceed with the hearing. ( 1 ) If the ALJ withdraws, another ALJ will be designated to conduct the hearing.
( 2 ) If the ALJ does not withdraw, the objecting party may, after the hearing, present its objections to the Departmental Appeals Board as reasons for changing, modifying, or reversing the ALJ's decision or providing a new hearing before another ALJ.
HomeRefugee Admissions...Documents for Congress

# 						Documents for Congress					

11 items

          -    Report  		Congressional Presentation Document for Fiscal Year 2018	  August 3, 2017 

previous page12

Back to Top
#### George LOWE v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52451.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 4, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Davey L. Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Mark A. Chinn, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; William F. Coleman, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

*1328REVERSED AS TO GRAND LARCENY; AFFIRMED AS TO PETIT LARCENY; AND REMANDED FOR RESEN-TENCING.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and HAWKINS, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh speed lookup table approach to radiometric calibration of multispectral image dataA concept for performing radiometric correction of multispectral image data onboard a spacecraft at very high data rates is presented and demonstrated. This concept utilized a lookup table approach, implemented in hardware, to convert the raw sensor data into the desired corrected output data. The digital lookup table memory was interfaced to a microprocessor to allow the data correction function to be completely programmable. Sensor data was processed with this approach at rates equal to the access time of the lookup table memory. This concept offers flexible high speed data processing for a wide range of applications and will benefit from the continuing improvements in performance of digital memories.Document ID19800024955Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKelly, W. L., IV*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Meredith, B. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Howle, W. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1980Subject CategorySpacecraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1741L-13893Accession Number80N33463Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 541-01-13-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800024955.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### CITY OF CORAL GABLES (Self-insured), Appellant, v. Officer Gerald A. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. SS-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1980.

*1213Joseph V. Niemoeller, of Peters, Pickle, Flynn, Niemoeller, Stieglitz & Hart, Miami, for appellant.

Jere N. Chait, of Canner & Chait, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the deputy commissioner finding the claimant, a police officer employed by the City of Coral Gables, was within the course and scope of his employment when he sustained certain injuries resulting from an accident while en route from his home to his place of employment is reversed. The accident occurred in an unincorporated area of Dade County, Florida, outside the limits of the City of Coral Gables. Accordingly, his injuries did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. *See City of Miami Beach*v. *Valeriani,*137 So.2d 226 (Fla.1962).

REVERSED.

ERVIN, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Pacific Islands Diplomatic Representatives

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Pacific Islands Diplomatic Representatives							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

August 9, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman participated in a talanoa roundtable discussion today with representatives from Pacific Island countries in Wellington, New Zealand.  The Deputy Secretary emphasized the United States’ deep commitment to the Indo-Pacific region and to the Pacific Islands. She underscored the United States’ interest in hearing from and engaging with Pacific Island partners on their priorities, including combating climate change, countering illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing, and supporting inclusive economic development. The Deputy Secretary expressed the United States’ continued commitment to consulting and working with our Pacific Island partners, including through the Partners in the Blue Pacific (PBP) initiative.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsClimate ChangeDeputy Secretary TripEconomic AffairsIndo-Pacific StrategyNew ZealandOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### Bobby Ray HAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3249

To authorize appropriations for a mining institute to develop domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of minerals from the nation’s seabed,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for a mining institute to develop

domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of

minerals from the nation’s seabed, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

5 2(a) of Public Law 98–409 (30 U.S.C. 1222(a)) is amend6 ed by adding the following at the end thereof:

7 ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary

8 not more than $1,200,000 for each of the fiscal years after
2

•HR 3249 IH

1 fiscal year 1996 to be made available by the Secretary to

2 an institute experienced in investigating the shallow and

3 deep seabed as a source for nonfuel minerals to be used

4 by the institute to assist in developing domestic techno5 logical capabilities required for the location of, and the ef6 ficient and environmentally sound recovery of, minerals

7 (other than oil and gas) from the nation’s shallow and

8 deep seabed.’’.

9 (b) SHORT TITLE.—Section 11 of Public Law 98–

10 409 (30 U.S.C. 1201 note) is amended to read as follows:

11 ‘‘SEC. 11. SHORT TITLE.

12 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mining and Mineral

13 Resources Institutes Act.’’.

Æ
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert Walter MURRAY, Appellee.

No. 80-1687.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 28, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Theda R. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Young v. State,*394 So.2d 525 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); *Monahan v. State,*390 So.2d 756 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
#### § 35.3 Noncompliance; deprivation of privileges.

Any patient who wilfully fails or refuses to comply with rules or instructions of a hospital or station or with regulations of the Service, may, by the direction of the officer in charge, be deprived of recreational or other privileges accorded patients. Any visitor who wilfully fails or refuses to comply with any such rules, instructions, or regulations may, by direction of the officer in charge, be denied visiting privileges.
§ 423.1982 Notice of a revised determination or decision. ( a ) *When adjudicators initiate reopenings.* When any determination or decision is reopened and revised as provided in § 423.1980: ( 1 ) The Part D plan sponsor, IRE, ALJ or attorney adjudicator, or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the enrollee at his or her last known address.
( 2 ) The IRE, ALJ or attorney adjudicator, or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the Part D plan sponsor.
( 3 ) An adverse revised determination or decision must state the rationale and basis for the reopening and revision and any right to appeal.
( b ) *Reopenings initiated at the request of an enrollee or a Part D plan sponsor.* ( 1 ) The Part D plan sponsor, IRE, ALJ or attorney adjudicator, or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the enrollee at his or her last known address.
( 2 ) The IRE, ALJ or attorney adjudicator or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the Part D plan sponsor.
( 3 ) An adverse revised determination or decision must state the rationale and basis for the reopening and revision and any right to appeal.
[74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5126, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### In re Coia

*John Harper,*for accountant.

*Thomas Thatcher,*for exceptant.

March 28, 1955.

Flood, J.,

The guardian ad litem appointed by the court to represent the minors in this suit has objected to certain items in the account of the guardian. The exceptions have to do first with the sale of two houses by the guardian at a time when the interested parties were in ignorance of a will in the possession of Carmela Coia, daughter of the ward. Under this will the two houses which were sold were to go to the ward’s other five children, or their children; if deceased, while the one which was not sold went to Carmela. However, the sale of these two properties was approved by the court and cannot be opened. Whether or not this should be considered in the distribution of the estate of Rose Coia, deceased, is not for us to determine but is a matter, in our opinion, for determination by the orphans’ court.

*312The second objection has to do with the bank accounts held in the joint names of Carmela Coia in trust for Rose Coia and the accounting filed by Carmela as to the expenditures of the money from these accounts which she said that she made for her mother. Here, too, we believe that in view of the ward’s death the matter should be disposed of by the orphans’ court under the doctrine of Keasbey’s Estate, 40 D. *&*C. 300 (1940).

For the reasons set forth above the account is confirmed.
§ 423.1032 Conduct of prehearing conference. ( a ) The prehearing conference is open to the affected party or its representative, to the CMS representatives and their technical advisors, and to any other persons whose presence the ALJ considers necessary or proper.
( b ) The ALJ may accept the agreement of the parties as to the following: ( 1 ) Facts that are not in controversy.
( 2 ) Questions that have been resolved favorably to the affected party after the determination in dispute.
( 3 ) Remaining issues to be resolved.
( c ) The ALJ may request the parties to indicate the following: ( 1 ) The witnesses that will be present to testify at the hearing.
( 2 ) The qualifications of those witnesses.
( 3 ) The nature of other evidence to be submitted.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3296 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3296

  To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to apply the same 
                 employer requirements to all persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 1996

Mr. Nethercutt (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Weller, Ms. 
    Dunn of Washington, Mr. Bereuter, and Mr. Skeen) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
    Educational Opportunities, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to apply the same 
                 employer requirements to all persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAME EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT.

    Section 102(f) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 
U.S.C. 2612(f)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Spouses'' in the subsection heading and 
        inserting ``Parents or siblings'',
            (2) by striking ``in which a husband and wife entitled to 
        leave under subsection (a) are'' and inserting ``in which more 
        than one parent or sibling entitled to leave under subsection 
        (a) to care for the same child or parent is'', and
            (3) striking ``both'' and inserting ``such parents or 
        siblings''.
                                 <all>
```