alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.504 Data reporting requirements. ( a ) In a data reporting period, a reporting entity must report applicable information for each CDLT furnished by its component applicable laboratories during the corresponding data collection period, as follows— ( 1 ) For CDLTs that are not ADLTs, initially January 1, 2017 and every 3 years beginning January 1, 2024.
( 2 ) For ADLTs that are not new ADLTs, every year beginning January 1, 2017.
( 3 ) For new ADLTs— ( i ) Initially, no later than the last day of the second quarter of the new ADLT initial period; and
( ii ) Thereafter, every year.
( b ) Applicable information must be reported in the form and manner specified by CMS.
( c ) A laboratory seeking new ADLT status for its test must, in its new ADLT application, attest to the actual list charge.
( d ) To certify data integrity, the President, CEO, or CFO of a reporting entity, or an individual who has been delegated authority to sign for, and who reports directly to, such an officer, must sign the certification statement and be responsible for assuring that the data provided are accurate, complete, and truthful, and meets all the reporting parameters described in this section.
( e ) If the Secretary determines that a reporting entity has failed to report applicable information for its applicable laboratories, or made a misrepresentation or omission in reporting applicable information for its applicable laboratories, the Secretary may apply a civil monetary penalty to a reporting entity in an amount of up to $10,000 per day, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec. 701 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, Pub. L. 114-74, November 2, 2015), for each failure to report or each such misrepresentation or omission. The provisions for civil monetary penalties that apply in general to the Medicare program under 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b apply in the same manner to the laboratory data reporting process under this section.
( f ) CMS or its contractors will not disclose applicable information reported to CMS under this section in a manner that would identify a specific payor or laboratory, or prices charged or payments made to a laboratory, except to permit the Comptroller General, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, to review the information, or as CMS determines is necessary to implement this subpart, such as disclosures to the HHS Office of Inspector General or the Department of Justice for oversight and enforcement activities.
( g ) Applicable information may not be reported for an entity that does not meet the definition of an applicable laboratory. For a single laboratory that offers and furnishes an ADLT that is not an applicable laboratory except with respect to its ADLTs, the applicable information of its CDLTs that are not ADLTs may not be reported.
[81 FR 41099, June 23, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 85028, Dec. 28, 2020; 87 FR 70225, Nov. 18, 2022; 88 FR 79531, Nov. 16, 2023]
# C_2005247EN.01002902.xml

| 6.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3962 — ML Global Private Equity/BACP Europes/N & W Global Vending SPA)

(2005/C 247/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3962. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3962. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3264 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3264

 To waive the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for D.C. Chartered 
                              Health Plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 1996

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for D.C. Chartered 
                              Health Plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT RULE FOR D.C. CHARTERED 
              HEALTH PLAN.

    The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act is deemed to be (and to have been) waived with respect to the D.C. 
Chartered Health Plan, Inc. of the District of Columbia for contract 
periods beginning on or after October 1, 1991, and ending before 
October 1, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended April 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such report on Form 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       177,595
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,068,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                 360,585
<INVENTORY>                                  603,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,874,749
<PP&E>                                     3,553,943
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,515,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,215,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,076,685
<BONDS>                                    6,584,711
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         256
<OTHER-SE>                                 6,553,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,215,061
<SALES>                                    4,919,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,919,588
<CGS>                                      2,107,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,715,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           407,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,278,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (448,902)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (829,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (829,379)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.36)


</TABLE>
# C_2005281EN.01002001.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Alcon v OHIM

(Case T-130/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier national word mark TRIVASTAN - Application for Community word mark TRAVATAN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 281/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Alcon Inc. (Hünenberg, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Breen, Solicitor, and J. Gleeson, Barrister)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and S. Laitinen, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance

  :
  Biofarma SA, (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: V. Gil Vega, A. Ruiz Lopez, and D. González Maroto, lawyer)

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance

:

Application for

annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 (Case R 968/2001-3) concerning opposition proceedings between Alcon Inc. and Biofarma SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 5.7.2003.

1

---
# C_2006060EN.01004701.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/47

---

Action brought on 30 December 2005 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM

(Case T-459/05)

(2006/C 60/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor (Mosbach, Germany) (represented by W. Göpfert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 19 October 2005 as regards the appeal proceedings R 1059/2004-2, and; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 19 October 2005 as regards the appeal proceedings R 1059/2004-2, and;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘manufacturing score card’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 — Application No 3 334 596

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the mark for which registration is sought is capable of being protected because the fact that the elements constituting the mark sought could, each in themselves, or, as part of a different constellation, perhaps have a descriptive content is not sufficient to preclude protection.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation, inasmuch as the overall combination of elements, as regards the goods and services for which registration of the mark is sought, is imaginative and conveys an unclear and vague meaning which goes beyond a mere bringing together of the terms.

---
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: December 1, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants ; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 -0602 FROM: U.S. EPA Region 7 SUBJECT: September 10, 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY**  **Speaker -**  Karl Brooks (8 - 10 minutes of remarks/5 minute Q&A)  **Attendees**

– 20 people - Greater Kansas City Federal Executive Board (list not available)  The board meets monthly  **Goals** o Provide a basic understanding of the Clean Power Plan o Ask for their cooperation in promoting the climate change and health effects messages within their sphere of influence o Leverage the strengths of our federal organization to make a more powerful impact in the communities in our four states. **EPA ATTENDEES**  **–**  Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, and Kathleen Fenton, Office of Public Affairs
# C_2006020EN.01003201.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/32

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4039 — Arrow/DNS)

(2006/C 20/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4039. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4039. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 11

- 13645 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:11

- cr
- 00024

- GKS

- GJK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

– Appellee,

v ersus DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS, a.k.a. Dominique Fields,
Defendant

– Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (January 10 , 2013)
Before MARCUS , MARTIN and KRAVITCH , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 22 Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Dominique Fields in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738,

87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel ’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Fields ’ s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

I, Donald C. Grenesko, the Senior Vice President/Finance and Administration
of Tribune Company, certify that (i) Tribune Companys Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 27, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2005 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations
of Tribune Company.



| | /s/ 
        Donald C. Grenesko         Donald C. Grenesko     
           Senior Vice President/         Finance and Administration  
                  April 29, 2005
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2nd. A correction was made to add the “What You 

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in 

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2, 2015

Mr. Michael Pietrantoni

577 South Meadows Drive

Chandler, AZ 85224

Dear Mr. Pietrantoni:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 31, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0862), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3068 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3068

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke 
 their charter of incorporation issued under the Indian Reorganization 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 1996

Mr. Gutknecht introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke 
 their charter of incorporation issued under the Indian Reorganization 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION OF THE PRAIRIE ISLAND 
              INDIAN COMMUNITY UNDER THE INDIAN REORGANIZATION ACT.

    The request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to surrender the 
charter of incorporation issued to that Community on July 23, 1937, 
pursuant to section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934, commonly known as 
the ``Indian Reorganization Act'' (25 U.S.C. 477) is hereby accepted 
and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005296EN.01003901.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/39

---

Communication

(2005/C 296/76)

On 9 November 2005, Waltraud Hakenberg was appointed Registrar of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal for a term of six years, in accordance with Article 3(4) of Council Decision 2004/752/EC, Euratom of 2 November 2004 establishing the European Union Civil Service Tribunal, and Articles 20 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.

---
Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

§ 405.1827 Record of proceedings before the contractor hearing officer(s). ( a ) The contractor hearing officer(s) must maintain a complete record of all proceedings in an appeal.
( b ) The record consists of all documents and any other tangible materials timely submitted to the hearing officer(s) by the parties to the appeal and by any nonparty (as described in § 405.1821(c) of this subpart), along with all correspondence, rulings, orders, and decisions (including the final decision) issued by the hearing officer(s).
( c ) The record must include a complete transcription of the proceedings at any contractor hearing.
( d ) A copy of the transcription must be made available to any party upon request.
[73 FR 30247, May 23, 2008]