alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meetings with the Government of Sri Lanka and Civil Society in Colombo

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meetings with the Government of Sri Lanka and Civil Society in Colombo							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 23, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma met with the President of Sri Lanka, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and Foreign Minister Ali Sabry today in Colombo. Deputy Secretary Verma highlighted U.S. support for Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, including through $270 million in economic support and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation’s $553 million in financing to support the Colombo West International Terminal. They also discussed progress on Sri Lanka’s IMF program, including economic and governance reforms aimed at putting Sri Lanka on the path to sustainable economic growth. They explored opportunities to deepen defense and maritime cooperation between the United States and Sri Lanka, including strengthening the Sri Lanka Navy’s capabilities to safeguard national security and promote a more stable Indo-Pacific region. In his meetings with government officials and members of civil society, Deputy Secretary Verma emphasized the importance of protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression, for a more inclusive, prosperous, and democratic Sri Lanka.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsCivil SocietyDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSri Lanka

Back to Top
HomeZambia

# Zambia

81 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Zambian Foreign Minister Kakubo	  May 19, 2022 
        -    		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Foreign Ministers from Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritania, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, and Senegal Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 18, 2022United Nations HeadquartersNew York, New York 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to South Africa and Zambia	  May 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Zambia Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 24, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Zambian General Elections	  Ned PriceAugust 16, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Finalists Announced for 2021 P3 Impact Award	  July 28, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Zambia	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Zambia	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Zambia	  June 25, 2021 

previous page1…34567…9next page

Back to Top
#### Louise C. SANDERS v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, EAST LOUISIANA STATE HOSPITAL.

No. 67177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1980.

In re the Department of State Civil Service, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Civil Service Commission. 383 So.2d 1053.

Granted.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                             ----------

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB/A of Touchstone Applied Science Associates,
Inc. (the "Company"), for the quarter ended January 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
L. Simon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Touchstone
Applied Science Associates, Inc., to the best of my
knowledge, that:

            1.	The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.	The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  June 13, 2005                   /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Andrew L. Simon, President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc. and will be retained by
Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff
§ 405.978 Effect of a reconsideration. A reconsideration is binding on all parties, unless— ( a ) An ALJ or attorney adjudicator decision is issued in accordance to a request for an ALJ hearing made in accordance with § 405.1014;
( b ) A review entity issues a decision in accordance to a request for expedited access to judicial review under § 405.990; or
( c ) The reconsideration is revised as a result of a reopening in accordance with § 405.980.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65334, Dec. 9, 2009; 82 FR 5108, Jan. 17, 2017]
HomeInternational Claims and Investment Disputes...Espiritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States

# 									Espiritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

##### *Espiritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States*

Espiritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC submitted claims against the United Mexican States in connection with a concession for the installation and maintenance of taximeters in Mexico City.  The claimants allege that Mexico has violated Articles 1102 (National Treatment), 1105 (Minimum Standard of Treatment), and 1110 (Expropriation and Compensation) of the NAFTA.

For further information and documents concerning this claim, click here.

03/21/2023: **U.S. Article 1128 Submission [413 KB]** (**accessible version**) **[306 KB]**

 

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsMexico

Back to Top
I 

I 

I ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Kabul River Construction & Logistics Co. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W5K9UR-l l-P-4006 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61644 

KRCC Administration 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

Evan C. Williams, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

After receiving a notice of appeal from Kabul River Construction & Logistics Co., 

sent from krcc.company@gmail.com, and signed "KRCC Administration," the Board 

docketed the appeal on June 12, 2018. By Order dated June 14, 2018, the Board directed 

appellant to show that its representative meets the requirements of Board Rule 15(a) 

within 14 days of the date of the Order. No response was received by the Board. 

By Order dated July 11, 2018, the Board again directed appellant to show that it is 

represented by a person meeting the criteria of Board Rule 15(a). The July 11, 2018 

Order stated that if appellant did not comply with the Order by July 30, 2018, the Board 

may dismiss the appeal without further notice to the parties. The Board has received no 

response from appellant. 

Without a representative meeting the requirements of Board Rule l 5(a), the Board 

is unable to proceed. The appeal is dismissed. 

Dated: August 17, 2018 

(Signatures continued) 

RIC~CKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

Administrat ve Judge 

Acting Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

(\~ _; 

~I 

CHRIS 

Administrative ' udge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61644, Appeal of Kabul River 

Construction & Logistics Co., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# C_2006080EN.01000901.xml

| 4.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4096 — Carrefour/Hyparlo)

(2006/C 80/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 24 March 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Carrefour (France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Hyparlo (France) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 24 March 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Carrefour (France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Hyparlo (France) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Carrefour: food and non-food retailing; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Carrefour: food and non-food retailing;

| — | for Hyparlo: food and non-food retailing. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Hyparlo: food and non-food retailing.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4096 — Carrefour/Hyparlo, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4096 — Carrefour/Hyparlo, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2006091EN.01000101.xml

| 19.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 April 2006

(2006/C 91/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2252 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4621 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6915 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3068 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5645 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 93,15 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,854 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5762 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,565 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,67 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9268 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4876 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,6 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,48 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6464 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,66 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4029 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5029 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9576 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9626 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 168,6 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4234 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8188 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3048 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 005,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5008 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,037 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,778 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,482 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2252

JPY

Japanese yen

144,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4621

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6915

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3068

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5645

ISK

Iceland króna

93,15

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,854

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5762

CZK

Czech koruna

28,565

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,67

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9268

RON

Romanian leu

3,4876

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,6

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,48

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6464

AUD

Australian dollar

1,66

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4029

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5029

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9576

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9626

KRW

South Korean won

1 168,6

ZAR

South African rand

7,4234

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8188

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3048

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 005,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5008

PHP

Philippine peso

63,037

RUB

Russian rouble

33,778

THB

Thai baht

46,482

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006154EN.01000301.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Order of the Court of 12 January 2006 — Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-162/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - EAGGF - Financial participation in a demonstration project concerning the introduction of new cultivation techniques in sumac production - Withdrawal of financial aid)

(2006/C 154/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis (represented by: M. Belard-Kopke Marques-Pinto, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Visaggio and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2005 in Case T-141/01 Entorn v Commission refusing an application to annul a decision of the Commission withdrawing financial aid from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), ‘Guidance’ Section, granted to the appellant for a demonstration project concerning the introduction of new cultivation techniques in sumac production

Entorn

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143 of 11.6.2005.

1

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Head Start Program Administrative Practice and Procedure; Appeal Procedures, 45 CFR Part 1303. *OMB No.:*
                     0980-0242. *Description:*
                     Section 646 of the Head Start Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to prescribe a timeline for conducting administrative hearings when adverse actions are taken or proposed against Head Start and Early Head Start grantees and delegate agencies. The Office of Head Start is proposing to renew, without changes, this rule, which implements these requirements and which prescribes when a grantee must submit certain information and what that information shall include. *Respondents:*
                     Head Start and Early Head Start grantees and Delegate Agencies. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response
Total burden hoursRule
20
1
26
520
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours*: 520. Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202-395-7245, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: September 3, 2009. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. E9-21718 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
# C_2006121EN.01001102.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/11

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 March 2006 — Yedaş Tarim ve Otomotiv Sanayi ve Ticaret v Council and Commission

(Case T-367/03) (1)

1

(Action for damages - International agreements - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Customs Union between the European Community and Turkey - Compensatory financial aid)

(2006/C 121/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yedaş Tarim ve Otomotiv Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: R. Sinner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and D. Canga Fano, Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Boudot and X. Lewis, Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Action for compensation for damage allegedly caused by the implementation of the procedures of the Customs Union instituted by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey and its Additional Protocols and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union (OJ 1996 L 35, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0115 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEXANDER KIM TORPPE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 19 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2021

10/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0115
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALFRED CALDWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-113-N, CA-97-452-2) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfred Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alfred Caldwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny themotion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Caldwell , Nos. CR-92-113-N; CA-97-452- 2 (E.D. Va. June 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED