alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1986
<SECURITIES>                                     15009
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2870
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                       2007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 22097
<PP&E>                                            5053
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2799)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         27862
<OTHER-SE>                                           9
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27871
<SALES>                                          13512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13512
<CGS>                                             5666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (11)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (998)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                103
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leslie SMITH v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT SECTION “F” PARISH OF ORLEANS.

No. 65090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Leslie Smith, applying for writ of mandamus. Orleans Parish.

Writ denied. Mandamus moot. By written judgment, March 12, 1979, the trial court denied relator’s application.
Supreme Court — Appellate Term,

July, 1898.

Before Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

#### J. Walter Thompson, appellant v. Henry E. Child, respondent.

- Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment in favor of defend ant entered on a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for anew trial.

Henry C. Bryan, for appellant; Duncan Edwards, for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
HomeKenya

# Kenya

215 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Ian J. McCary, Deputy Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS	  December 5, 2023BRUSSELS HUB 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Accelerating Fast Mitigation: Summit on Methane and Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kenya	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Kenya for Third Cyber and Digital Dialogue in Nairobi	  November 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism Landberg’s Travel to Kenya and Somalia	  November 17, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		This Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Every Week, the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs Works to Build Sustainable Businesses Worldwide	  November 17, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Travels to Nairobi, Kenya for the Opening of a Coalition for Climate Entrepreneurship Hub	  November 14, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kenyan Prime Cabinet Secretary/  Cabinet Secretary for Foreign and Diaspora Affairs Mudavadi	  November 10, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Kenya	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Winners of the 2023 Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence	  October 19, 2023 

previous page123456…22next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,544
<PP&E>                                         222,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,448
<BONDS>                                         19,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,188
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,510
<SALES>                                        115,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,246
<CGS>                                           85,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
### Natural radioactive disequilibrium of the uranium series

By: John Nicholas Rosholt Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1084A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 10.25

DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION

The compensation payable to all of the Company's non-employee directors is as
follows:

      o     An annual cash retainer of $5,000.00.

      o     In addition,  non-employee  directors each receive  $700.00 for each
            regular meeting of the Board of Directors attended.

      o     In  addition,  members of the Audit  Committee  are paid $250.00 for
            each Audit Committee meeting attended.

The  compensation  of  executive  officers is reviewed and adjusted on an annual
basis as of the  individual's  anniversary date of hire, based upon the approval
of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

As of March 13, 2006, current annual salaries of each of the following executive
officers is shown below:

             --------------------------------------------
             Name                           Salary
             --------------------------------------------
             David B. Lee                  $   50,000
             --------------------------------------------
             Donita R. Koval                  300,000
             --------------------------------------------
             Daniel L. Warfel                 228,732
             --------------------------------------------
             David N. Thiel                   136,320
             --------------------------------------------

             --------------------------------------------

Mr. Thiel is an at-will employee of the Company.


                                       44
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3212 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3212

  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide a limited 
overtime exemption for employees performing emergency medical services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1996

  Mr. Fawell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide a limited 
overtime exemption for employees performing emergency medical services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.

    Section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
207(k)) is amended in the matter before paragraph (1)--
            (1) by striking ``or any employee'' and inserting ``, any 
        employee'', and
            (2) by inserting before ``if'' the following: ``, or any 
        paramedic, emergency medical technician, or rescue and 
        ambulance service personnel trained to provide emergency 
        medical services and to provide transport of persons receiving 
        such services or transport of persons to receive such 
        services''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1008.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) This part contains the specific procedures for the submission of requests by an individual or entity for advisory opinions to, and the issuance of advisory opinions by, the OIG, in consultation with the Department of Justice (DoJ), in accordance with section 1128D(b) of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7d(b). The OIG will issue such advisory opinions based on actual or proposed factual circumstances submitted by the requesting individual or entity, or by counsel on behalf of the requesting individual or entity, provided all other requirements of this part are satisfied (including the requirement that the requesting individual or entity provide the certifications required in accordance with § 1008.38 of this part).
( b ) An individual or entity may request an advisory opinion from the OIG regarding any of five specific subject matters described in § 1008.5 of this part.
( c ) The requesting party must provide a complete description of the facts as set forth in subpart B of this part, and pay the costs to the OIG of processing the request for an advisory opinion as set forth in subpart C of this part.
( d ) Nothing in this part limits the investigatory or prosecutorial authority of the OIG, DoJ or any other agency of the Government.
[62 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 38324, July 16, 1998]
§ 412.509 Furnishing of inpatient hospital services directly or under arrangement. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of § 412.521(b), the applicable payments made under this subpart are payment in full for all inpatient hospital services, as defined in § 409.10 of this chapter. Inpatient hospital services do not include the following: ( 1 ) Physicians' services that meet the requirements of § 415.102(a) of this subchapter for payment on a fee schedule basis.
( 2 ) Physician assistant services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act.
( 3 ) Nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act.
( 4 ) Certified nurse midwife services, as defined in section 1861(gg) of the Act.
( 5 ) Qualified psychologist services, as defined in section 1861(ii) of the Act.
( 6 ) Services of an anesthetist, as defined in § 410.69 of this subchapter.
( b ) Medicare does not pay any provider or supplier other than the long-term care hospital for services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary who is an inpatient of the hospital except for services described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section.
( c ) The long-term care hospital must furnish all necessary covered services to the Medicare beneficiary who is an inpatient of the hospital either directly or under arrangements (as defined in § 409.3 of this subchapter).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese Defense Minister Ngoubili

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese Defense Minister Ngoubili							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 6, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Gabonese Minister of Defense Félicité Ongouori Ngoubili today in Libreville.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and Minister Ngoubili discussed opportunities to strengthen maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea, continue joint training programs with the Gabonese military, and deepen peace and security in the region and globally.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateGabonOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration  Releases

# Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Releases

370 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Request for Concept Notes for Humanitarian Research	  February 17, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Innovation in Child Protection: Intersectoral Approaches for Child Well-being	  February 17, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Chad, Cameroon, and Southeast Nigeria	  February 17, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance  		Casa Pintada: Helping Colombian Communities Rebuild Trust Among Neighbors	  Lesley C. ZimanFebruary 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on the Proposed Emergency Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2021	  February 12, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Suspending and Terminating the Asylum Cooperative Agreements with the Governments El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 6, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Rebuilding and Enhancing U.S. Refugee Resettlement Programs	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 4, 2021 
        -    		Creating a Comprehensive Framework to Promote Safe, Orderly Migration in North and Central America	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 2, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in South America	  February 1, 2021 
        -    PRM Research/Evaluation  		Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration-Funded Programs for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons in the Caucasus	  January 27, 2021 

previous page1…323334353637next page

Back to Top
Jan-13-2005 11.28 PM Office of Sen Susan Collins 202-228-0476 4/6 

SADCoaratol 

MARKETING SOUTHERN AROOSTOOK 

Building Soud1arn Aroostook OM Job nt n Tima 

·November 30,2011 

The Honorable Raymond LaHood 

Secretary 

C) oT- o ST- ~ud o -g'()\;)__ 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SB 

Washingtont DC 20590 

RE: Essential Air Service oidders for the Northern Maine Regional Airport- Presque Isle, ME 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I am the Executive Director of the Southern Aroostook Development Corporation (SADC) located in 

Houlton. ME in Southern Aroostook County. We are a non-profit, private economic development 

organization. Houlton is located 45 miles south of Presque Isle on U.S. Route 1. 

The Northern Maine Regional Airport plays a vital ro1e in the economic vitality of our region. We 

recently leamed of a new law that allows Essential Air Service bidders to submit proposals for 8 seat 

aircraft. We are extremely concerned with this possible scenario from an economic standpoint. 

We have seen the airport continue to lose aircraft size and number of flights to the point a few years ago 

of 1 5 seat aircraft. While the business community did not like to see diminished size happen, they 

understood the reasoning. At least we had non-stop service to a hub. 

Our closest commercial airport, other than the Northern Maine Regional Airport, is in Bangor, ME. 

Bangor is ·120 miles south of Houlton and an even worse hardship for those located in Northern 

Aroostook County. They are 250 miles from the airport .. 

This is what the citizens of Aroostook County would have to do if they want to make business trips, 

because 8 seat planes could not fly non-stop to important hubs such as Boston, JFK or LaGuardia. 

Imagine businessmen and women that fly on a regular basis and the hardship thjs would pose with their 

productivity and the increased expense. 

We are a very rural area and business attraction is a huge enough challenge without throwing this obstacle 

at us. We currently bring in site selectors to see the region and see what we have to offer to businesses 

looking to expand. hnagine the scenario where they fly into some hub, then on to Bangor and then have 

to drive two to four hours to reach their destination because there isn't service from a hub directly to 

Presque Isle. Do you think this would make a favorable impression on the· site selector or even a CEO 

that might be interested in locating here? 

On behalf of the SADC Board of Directors, I urge you to maintain the current standard of a 1 S seat plane. 

Sincerely yours, 

jl~ 171;1~ 

Jon A. McLaughlin, Executive Director 

Southern Aroostook Development Corp. 

SOUTHERN AROOSTOOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORA TJON • P.O. Box 783 • Houlton, Maine 04730 • (207) 521..0157
696 A.2d 805

#### STONEHEDGE SQUARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Respondent, v. MOVIE MERCHANTS, INC., d/b/a Movie Merchants, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 18, 1997.

Jordan D. Cunningham and Edwin A.D. Schwartz, Harrisburg, for Petitioner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the following:

*229Whether the Superior Court’s decision to rely on this Court’s decision in *Auer v. Penn,*99 Pa. 370 (1882) was improper?
# C_2006108EN.01000702.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/7

---

Appeal brought on 1 March 2006 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment delivered on 15 December 2005 in Case T-33/01 Infront WM AG (formerly Kirchmedia WM AG) v Commission of the EC

(Case C-125/06 P)

(2006/C 108/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Banks and M. Huttunen, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: French Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Parliament and Council of the European Union.

Other parties to the proceedings:

The appellant claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the CFI of 15 December 2005 in case T-33/01, Infront WM AG v. Commission of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the CFI of 15 December 2005 in case T-33/01, Infront WM AG v. Commission of the European Communities;

| — | give final judgment in the matter by declaring that the Applicant in Case T-33/01 was inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

give final judgment in the matter by declaring that the Applicant in Case T-33/01 was inadmissible;

| — | order the Applicant in Case T-33/01 to pay the costs of the Commission arising from that case and the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Applicant in Case T-33/01 to pay the costs of the Commission arising from that case and the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This appeal concerns the issues of direct and individual concern within the meaning of Article 230, fourth paragraph, EC. The Commission considers that, in the judgment under appeal, the Court of First Instance (hereinafter ‘the CFI’) has erred in law in its interpretation and application of those concepts. It has thereby upset the institutional balance which is reflected in the rules governing access to the Community courts in order to challenge the validity of a Community act. The CFI has treated as directly and individually concerned by a Commission decision an enterprise which could, at the very most, be considered to have suffered indirect economic damage as a result of the decision in question, and which has not even shown the likelihood of such damage. It has accepted as constituting individual concern elements common to many other operators finding themselves in situations comparable to that of the Applicant.

---