alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harold HART, Appellant, v. COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. XX-225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 1981.

David R. Lewis, Jacksonville, for appellant.

C. T. Boyd, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellee.

LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s summary final judgment in this insurance dispute on the authority of Section 627.728(4)(a), Florida Statutes:

> No insurer shall fail to renew a policy unless it shall mail by registered mail or certified mail, or deliver to the named insured, at the address shown in the policy, and to the named insured’s insurance agent at his business address, at least 45 days advance notice of its intention not to renew, and the reasons for refusal to renew must accompany such notice. The requirement for mailing notice by registered mail or certified mail shall not apply to an agent that has agreed to represent exclusively one insurer or a group of insurers under common management. This subsection shall not apply:

> 1. If the insurer has manifested its willingness to renew; or

> 2. In case of nonpayment of premium. *Notwithstanding the failure of an insurer to comply with this subsection, the policy shall terminate on the effective date of any other automobile liability insurance policy procured by the insured with respect to any automobile designated in both policies. * * **(emphasis supplied)

*1209Here, the record affirmatively demonstrates that the plaintiff had procured a new automobile insurance policy from another company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, with an effective date of September 22, 1979. Therefore, the trial court was eminently correct in finding that the defendant insurance company was relieved of its contractual obligations under its automobile insurance policy when the insured submitted to it proof of coverage by another insurer for the date of the accident, September 23, 1979. Inasmuch as this finding is affirmatively supported by the record and has not been contested on appeal by the insured, we have no alternative but to affirm the trial court’s judgment. However, we note with disfavor the defendant insurance company’s filing of the supporting affidavit for its motion for summary judgment a mere two days before the hearing on the motion. While this Court has not yet expressly considered the issue of when supporting affidavits for motions for summary judgment are to be filed, the better weight of authority indicates that any affidavits with which the moving party plans to support his summary claim should be presented at least twenty days prior to the hearing on the motion. *See Coastal Caribbean Corporation v. Rawlings,*361 So.2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Trawick, *Florida Practice and Procedure,*§ 25-8, p. 367. Viewed in the circumstances of this case, however, we can only conclude that the defendant insurance company’s belated filing was harmless error. Therefore, the summary final judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### Jean Chitcher GULINO v. Richard Edward GULINO.

No. 9868.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 29, 1974.

Ronald L. Causey, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

William R. Weatherford, Oak Grove, for appellee.

Before LANDRY, J., and BAILES, J. Pro Tem.

BAILES, Judge Pro Tem.

Herein the court, ex proprio motu-, issued an order to the appellant, Mrs. Jean Critcher Gulino, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as not having been timely perfected. From our examination of the record we find the appeal was timely, and the show cause order is recalled.

The record shows that the case was tried on July 3, 1973, and on July 26, 1973, the trial judge rendered lengthy written reasons for judgment. At this rendition, however, no final judgment was signed. Apparently, a deputy clerk of court believed that the rendition of written reason for judgment signed by the trial judge was a “final” judgment within the purview of LSA-C.C.P. Article 1913 which required a notice of judgment as there appears on the last page of the reasons for judgment a certificate by the deputy clerk that “ * * * a notice of the above judgment was mailed by me * * * ” to the therein named attorneys. This notice was mailed on July 26, 1973.

Subsequent to the rendition of the written reasons for judgment, the judge signed a final judgment on August 3, 1973, which, under LSA-C.C.P. Article 1913, did require notice of judgment. However, no notice was sent to either of the attorneys of record. Thus the thirty day period during which an appeal must be perfected as provided by LSA-C.C.P. Article 3942 did not commence to toll.

Therefore, the appeal petitioned for and perfected by the filing of the required appeal bond on November S, 1973, was timely and within the delay specified in LSA-C. C.P. Article 3942.

Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons the show cause order issued herein by the court on March IS, 1974, is recalled.

Order recalled.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Ronald
E. Kimbrough, Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough


Ronald E. Kimbrough
Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
#### Jimmie BROOKS v. HOLMES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and Joe T. Jones.

No. 52023.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 20, 1980.

Leonard McClellan, Oxford, for appellant.

John Arthur Eaves, Jackson, for appel-lees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Holmes County; Rufus H. Broome, Special Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 137.353 What is contained in a construction project financial report?

Construction project financial reports contain information regarding the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, and financial concerns of the Self-Governance Tribe, if any.
#### Everett WALKER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51838.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 30, 1980.

Travis T. Vance, Jr., Vicksburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine Walker Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sharkey County; Ben Guider, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
HomeDSS Press Releases...Diplomatic Security Service Commits to 30×30 Initiative

# 									Diplomatic Security Service Commits to 30×30 Initiative							

DSS Releases

April 18, 2024

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) announced today its commitment to the 30×30 Initiative, joining a coalition of law enforcement leaders, researchers, and professional organizations who seek to advance the representation and experiences of women in all ranks of policing across the United States.

By signing this initiative, DSS pledges to increase the representation of women in its recruit classes to 30 percent by 2030, and to ensure its policies and culture intentionally support the success of its female law enforcement officers.

Today’s announcement also demonstrates DSS’ efforts to promote a diverse and inclusive workforce and fulfill the federal law enforcement recruitment, retention and accountability goals set forth in Executive Order 14074.

“DSS is proud to join a group of more than 240 law enforcement agencies that have committed to improving the representation and experiences of women in law enforcement,” said DSS Director Carlos Matus. “Although this initiative is aimed at increasing the representation of women, completing the pledge actions will further our progress towards increasing all types of diversity across DSS.”

*DSS has the largest global presence of any U.S. law enforcement organization, operating at more than 270 U.S. diplomatic posts in over 170 countries, and in 30+ U.S. cities. The organization is responsible for investigating transnational crimes and for protecting State Department facilities, people, and information as part of its mission to lead worldwide security and law enforcement efforts that advance U.S. foreign policy and safeguard national security interests.*

To learn more about the Diplomatic Security Service, please visit diplomaticsecurity.state.gov.

For media queries, please contact DS-Press@state.gov.

Tags

District of ColumbiaDSS ReleasesUnited StatesWomen's IssuesWomen's Rights

Back to Top
#### Julian Vincente ORTEGA and Mulida G. Rivera and Cotton Belt Insurance Company, a Tennessee Corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 80-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1981.

Carl H. Lida, Miami, for appellants.

Janet Reno, State Atty. and Stephen V. Rosin and Russell R. Killinger, Asst. State Attys., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Norris v. State,*386 So.2d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); *Ryan v. State,*380 So.2d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Weaver v. *State,*370 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
### L-pARTMEN TO F :'-"'S^ORTAT|O N SERVE D DECEMBE R13 , 201 0 ' -•'" [ (jPER.'JIOM S 

### ,p ^ 7 C ! 3 P2

^ m

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F 

### SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . FAA DOCKE T NO . CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-031 2 AMENDE D ORDE R GRANTIN G MOTIO N T O TAK E JUDICIA L NOTIC E Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) file d o n Decembe r 10 , 2010 , Complainant' s Secon d Motio n t o Tak e Judicia l Notice . Th e Orde rserve d Septembe r27 , 201 0 grantin g Complainant' s reques t t o tak e judicia l notic e i s hereb yamende d an d supplemente d b yaddin g a paragrap h 3 , a s follows :

3 . 1 4 C.F.R . §§121.133(a) , 121.135(b)(17) , 121.137 , an d 121.369(b) .s o ORDERED .

U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFAA Docke t No . CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Cierk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l L . Dworkin, Respondent' s Counse l Michae l L . Dworki nandAssociate s Law Office s 46 5 Californi aStreet , Suite 21 0 Sa nFrancisco , C A 9410 4 TEL : 415-421-250 0 FAX : 415-421-256 0 Scot t R . Morris , Complainan i ' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regional Counse l Northwes t

Mountai nRegion , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W

A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i nperso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

USGS Online Publications Directory

```
NameLast modifiedSizeParent Directory                                    -   
coverthb.jpg                   31-May-2016 14:26   49K  
sim3357.pdf                    31-May-2016 18:50   18M  
sim3357_geodatabase.zip        31-May-2016 14:31  285M  
sim3357_metadata.zip           31-May-2016 14:32   30K  
sim3357_shapefile.zip          31-May-2016 14:32  588K
```

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey            URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3357/            Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
§ 408.102 Reconsideration of termination. ( a ) *Basic rules.* Coverage may be reinstated without interruption of benefits if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The enrollee appeals the termination by the end of the month following the month in which SSA sent the notice of termination.
( 2 ) The enrollee alleges and it is found that the enrollee did not receive timely and adequate notice that the premiums were overdue.
( 3 ) The enrollee pays, within 30 days after SSA's subsequent request for payment, all premiums due through the month in which he or she appealed the termination.
( b ) *Basis for reinstating coverage.* Coverage may be reinstated if the evidence establishes one of the following: ( 1 ) The enrollee acted diligently to pay the premiums or to request relief upon receiving a premium notice very late in the grace period or shortly after its end, and the delayed notice was not the enrollee's fault. (For example, if the billing notice was misaddressed or lost in the mail, it would not be the enrollee's fault; if the enrollee had moved and not notified SSA of the new address, he or she would be responsible for the delay.)
( 2 ) On the basis of information given by SSA, the enrollee could reasonably have believed that the premiums were being paid by deduction from benefits or by some other means. (An example would be a notice indicating that premiums would be paid by a State Medicaid agency or a group payer or would be deducted from the spouse's civil service annuity.)
( c ) *No basis for reinstating coverage.* Coverage may not be reinstated if the enrollee— ( 1 ) Received timely and adequate notice but failed to pay within the grace period, for example because of insufficient income or resources; or
( 2 ) Appealed the termination more than one month after the month in which SSA sent the termination notice.
#### Louis Weinstein, Respondent, v. Louis Flaxman, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,.

June, 1898.)

Municipal courts of Hew York city — Order opening a default — Amendment.

An order of a justice of a. municipal court of tire city of New York, opening the plaintiff’s default, must state the grounds of the order (Laws of 1896, chap. 748). but, although it fails to do so, where the return of the justice "states the grounds' and he further certifies that the defendant’s attorney prepared and submitted the order, the Appellate Term will not reverse it, but will permit it to be amended by inserting the statement made by the justice as to the grounds upon which he proceeded.

Appeal from an order'of the Municipal Court of the city of 'New York, borough of Manhattan, fourth district, opening plaintiff’s default.

Abraham B. Schleimer, for appellant.

Joel Krone, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal is taken from an order made by the justice, below opening the plaintiff’s default incurred by reason, of his failure to proceed with the' trial. The justice considered that the default was sufficiently excused, and we see no reason for disturbing Ms conclusion in that regard. It appears, however,' that he has failed to recite in the order, the grounds- upon wMch it was made, and he is required to’ do by chapter 748 of the Laws of 1896. This would ordinarily call for a reversal. Colwell v. Devlin, 20 Misc. Rep. 355. The justice, however, in making his return fully, sets-forth such grounds, and further certifies that the order in question was prepared and submitted to Mm-for signature by the attorney for the defendant, who now appeals from the same. The indorsement upon the back of the order' also shows that it was prepared and submitted by him'. -This was a somewhat extraordinary proceed-ing, and might well be regarded as a waiver of the objection w-Mch has been made. But without regard to that, we think we have" the power and have concluded to modify the order by the insertion of a *703recital embodying the statement made by the justice below of the grounds upon which he proceeded.

Order modified as above stated, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildeesleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Order modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
Home1998 Treaties and Agreements...Cyprus (13000) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program

# 									Cyprus (13000) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 24, 1998

Environment and Conservation: GLOBE Program

Agreement signed at Nicosia November 24, 1998; Entered into force November 24, 1998. With appendices.

 
Download attachment						 [391 KB]

Tags

CyprusEnvironmentTreaties

Back to Top
#### FIRST STATE BANK OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. JAY F. RAINWEAR CO., INC., a corporation and A. Lawrence Fishman, Appellees.

No. 74-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 
 **INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR'S CONSENT**
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously
filed Registration Statements of PAB Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-74819, 333-89527 and 333-107039) and Form S-3D (33-74080) of our
report, dated February 22, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
PAB Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
 
 
 /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins,
LLC
 
 
 
 Albany,
Georgia
 March 16,
2005
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. David STAFFORD v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden.

No. 82-KH-0290.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re David Stafford, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Rapides. No. 162360.

Denied.
#### § 549.313 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support,* as used in § 549.201(a)(2) of this part, means any property, tangible or intangible, including but not limited to currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this definition means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.
#### C & B EQUIPMENT CO., INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. William BATES, Appellee.

No. AC-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 11, 1982.

*1147Patrick J. Malone of Beisler & Wells, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Philip S. Anderson of Anderson & Anderson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the deputy commissioner is AFFIRMED except for reservation of jurisdiction “to adjudicate any and all issues . .. . ” When the final order disposes of all matters properly before the deputy, any reservation of jurisdiction should be restricted to a determination of taxable costs and attorney’s fees.

McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
HomePakistan

# Pakistan

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

292 items

        -    DS Memorial  		Abad Ullah	  April 5, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (07-430) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Their Customs Administrations	  April 30, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (07-319) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement, as Amended	  March 19, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Rao Dilshad Ahmed	  January 1, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (04-213) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  February 13, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-1106) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  November 6, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-1016.1) – Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation	  October 16, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-627.1) – Agreement Regarding Grants Under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and the Furnishing of Defense Articles, Related Training, and Other Defense Services from the US to Pakistan	  June 27, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-625) – Agreement Concerning Trade and Investment Relations	  June 25, 2003 
        -    		Ghulam  Murtaza	  February 28, 2003 

previous page1…2627282930next page

Back to Top
```

                                                                                EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                      18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cognigen  Networks,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September  30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Thomas S.  Smith,  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/  Thomas S. Smith
                                    --------------------
                                    Thomas S. Smith
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 5, 2004
```
#### BETTIE SUE IVY BOLLING BEDDINGFIELD, Individually and as Next Friend of Dallas Samuel Bolling Beddingfield, a minor, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-5006.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2001.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.