alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                            September 30,                      September 30,
                                                            -------------                      -------------
                                                        2000             1999              2000             1999
                                                        ----             ----              ----             ----
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>
Net income (loss)                                   $ 3,084,934      $  (878,138)      $ 5,862,062      $(2,392,070)
                                                    ===========      ===========       ===========      ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                             9,486,424        7,836,237         9,444,969        7,740,136

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options                 567,002           12,059           442,573           89,430

Convertible preferred stock                                  --               --                --               --

Subtraction of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                          --          (12,059)               --          (89,430)
                                                    -----------      -----------       -----------      -----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                              10,053,426        7,836,237         9,887,542        7,740,136
                                                    ===========      ===========       ===========      ===========



Basic net income (loss) per share                   $      0.33      $     (0.11)      $      0.62      $     (0.31)
                                                    ===========      ===========       ===========      ===========


Diluted net income (loss) per share                 $      0.31      $     (0.11)      $      0.59      $     (0.31)
                                                    ===========      ===========       ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDAVID H. GILLChief Executive OfficerMarch 9, 2004/s/ Thomas L. ReddingTHOMAS L. REDDINGChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 9, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### § 23.3 What entities are eligible to apply for assignment?

Any public or nonprofit private entity which is located in a health manpower shortage area, or has a demonstrated interest in the shortage area, may apply for the assignment of National Health Service Corps personnel.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 306 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 306

      To modify the project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. King introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To modify the project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Shoreline Resources 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. JONES INLET, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York, is modified to 
direct the Secretary to place noncontaminated dredged material on beach 
areas downdrift from the federally maintained channel, at full Federal 
expense, for the purpose of mitigating the interruption of littoral 
system natural processes caused by the jetty and continued dredging of 
the federally maintained channel.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald Ray LEE.

No. 67067.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Donald Ray Lee, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Richland. No. 31,118.

Writ denied.
# 	  

	




# 	 	


 
 

# 	
 	 

     ! ! " !# "  $ %  !&

# '( )*  )# )! +!* #   "* ,++ # -+.+/

   #    ! & 0  ) -!


, ')-,( "1 )-,$2)%345/

 

6     '( . %
3   +  .

 .* 

  !    
7  /

#   ! 8/ # 
! 	    
   -9

:+; -<6.6:8. 68$-=     + *  . %
3/

	  	

+##  & 0 7
7/



>  0 7
7  

&1



## 	 	 



 	 	

!

" 	 	#

 ! 	#

 $  ! 	
 ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 7
7 ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ +?? ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 5 ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ,) ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ * ,2



@ ;

&!





8A ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 7%

7
% ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 7+?

77+

7
+?

7
7+ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ

ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ , )0 ' (  

+)  # 0/

8A :
 
"
  +) &

# 0 '8 3%@@(/	 


# 	  

	




# 	
	


 
 %  	 	 !
### NO. 2 POWER BOILER

**Month** Avg SO2 tpd*Avg SO2 lb/hr*


### 2011 January 4.18 348.3 February 5.34 445.0 March 5.10 425.0 April 4.45 370.8 May 2.79 232.5 June 2.20 183.3 July 2.24 186.7 August 3.28 273.3 September 2.27 189.2 October 3.18 265.0 November 4.78 398.3 December 3.66 305.0


### 2012 January 3.79 315.8 February 4.25 354.2 March 3.57 297.5 April 4.01 334.2 May 3.49 290.8 June 2.75 229.2 July 3.56 296.7 August 3.72 310.0 September 1.08 90.0 October 3.10 258.3 November 4.56 380.0 December 5.14 428.3


### 2013 January 4.13 344.2 February 3.75 312.5 March 3.80 316.7 April 3.81 317.5 May 3.30 275.0 June 3.07 255.8 July 1.71 142.5 August 2.58 215.0 September 2.79 232.5 October 2.11 175.8 November 2.57 214.2 December 1.24 103.3
Average SO2 Emission Rate (lb/hr): 280.9

* The Avg SO2 tpd was directly taken from spreadsheet previously provided by Domtar, titled "2 PB Monthly SO2 Data," which was included as an attachment to the August 29, 2014 letter from Annabeth Reitter, Corporate Manager of Environmental Regulation, Domtar, to Dayana Medina, U.S. EPA Region 6. The data from this same spreadsheet is what we used calculate the average SO2 removal efficiency of the existing scrubbers (69.3%). Therefore, the average SO2 emission rate of 280.9 lb/hr is representative of 69.3 % control, or 30.7% uncontrolled SO2 emissions.


## Calculations for Monthly Average Emission Rate at 90% Control Efficiency:
280.9 lb/hr = 30.7% Uncontrolled SO2 Emissions

0.31 lb*820 MMBtu = 254.2 lb/hr MMBtu hr

280.9 lb/hr = 254.2 lb/hr 30.7 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions X X = 27.8 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions (72.2% Control Efficiency) **254.2 lb/hr or 0.31 lb/MMBtu represents 72.2% Control Efficiency**

280.9 lb/hr = X 30.7 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions 10 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions X = 91.5 lb/hrAn emission rate of 91.5 lb/hr is representative of 10% uncontrolled SO2 emissions, or 90% control efficiency.

**Another way to calculate Monthly Average Emission Rate at 90% control efficiency:** 280.9 lb/hr = 30.7% Uncontrolled SO2 emissions
100% Uncontrolled SO2 Emissions = 280.9 lb/hr =914.98 lb/hr 0.307 90% Control Efficiency =914.98 lb/hr * 0.10 = 91.5 lb/hr

91.5 lb* hr=

### 0.11 lb/MMBtu hr 820 MMBtu* The Avg SO2 tpd was directly taken from spreadsheet previously provided by Domtar, titled "2 PB Monthly SO2 Data," which was included as an attachment to the August 29, 2014 letter from Annabeth Reitter, Corporate Manager of Environmental Regulation, Domtar, to Dayana Medina, U.S. EPA Region 6. The data from this same spreadsheet is what we used calculate the average SO2 removal efficiency of the existing scrubbers (69.3%). Therefore, the average SO2

**254.2 lb/hr or 0.31 lb/MMBtu represents 72.2% Control Efficiency**
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

APPLIED SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE PROFIT (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Year Ended September 30,
                                   -----------------------------------
                                      1997         1996         1995
                                   ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted average shares
  outstanding - Supplement A       2,953,941    2,953,941    2,685,698

Net profit (loss)                    $51,919      $21,878      ($5,345)

Per share amount                       $0.02        $0.01       ($0.00)

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1 SUPPLEMENT A

APPLIED SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Weighted
                                                  Average
                                    Common        Shares
                                    Shares      Outstanding
                                   ---------    -----------
<S>                                <C>           <C>
Balance at September 30, 1994      1,996,064
                                   ---------
                                   ---------

Balance at September 30, 1995      2,953,941      2,685,698
                                   ---------      ---------
                                   ---------      ---------

Balance at September 30, 1996      2,953,941      2,953,941
                                   ---------      ---------
                                   ---------      ---------

Balance at September 30, 1997      2,953,941      2,953,941
                                   ---------      ---------
                                   ---------      ---------

</TABLE>
From: Brian Glover [bglover@environcorp.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 8:55 AM

To: Shepherd, Lorinda

Cc: Kyle Heitkamp; Michael Carbon

Subject: RE: Statoil (Discoverer Americas) EGEN and ACOMP engines

Categories: OCS

Hi Lori,

We agree you are on the right track. You are remembering our discussions correctly. We argued that 

compliance with a more stringent standard such as EPA Tier 2 is an inherent part of the engine design, 

and modifications or retrofits were not available or feasible (i.e. the manufacturer cannot “certify” the 

engine as Tier 2 after modifications, the engine must be designed and purchased as Tier 2). Thus, to 

meet Tier 2 standards, an engine would have to be replaced with a newer engine designed for the same

performance or power rating under the same operating conditions as the original engine. The challenge 

with this is that the engines on these drilling vessels, such as the EGEN and ACOMPs on the Discoverer 

Americas, were sized to meet vessel space and weight distribution requirements during the initial design 

phase of the vessel. Replacement of these engines would require a redesign of the footprint or frame 

for the engine, and could also require modifications to the structural supports of the drilling vessel. We 

believe these significant modifications to be technically infeasible.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,

Brian

From: Shepherd, Lorinda [mailto:Shepherd.Lorinda@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:31 PM

To: Michael Carbon

Cc: Brian Glover; Kyle Heitkamp

Subject: Statoil (Discoverer Americas) EGEN and ACOMP engines

I am trying to remember back to our conference call in March where we discussed the technical 

problems associated with locating replacement engines for anything that was installed as part of the 

ship’s original design. I recall that we were discussing the engines’ individual footprints, and I seem to 

remember someone saying that you had been looking at available engines and none of them had fit the 

specifications. Unfortunately, I don’t have that in my notes. Can you confirm this? Or, tell me I am 

imagining things? Would that be the case for both the EGEN and the ACOMPs?

Thanks,

Lori Shepherd

Environmental Scientist

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

61 Forsyth Street

Atlanta, GA 30303

(404) 562-8435
This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by 

law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the 

addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose 

to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in 

error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately 

delete all copies of the message.
# C_2006054EN.01004701.xml

| 4.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/47

---

Amendment to the notice of invitation to tender for the reduction in the import duty on maize imported from non-member countries

(Official Journal of the European Union C 325 of 22 December 2005)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 325 of 22 December 2005)

(2006/C 54/10)

On page 40, the text of point 2 under heading I ‘Subject’ is amended as follows:

| ‘2. | The total quantity in respect of which the reduction in the import duty may be fixed is 483 154 tonnes.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2.

The total quantity in respect of which the reduction in the import duty may be fixed is 483 154 tonnes.’

---
# C_2005229EN.01003102.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/31

---

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Miriam Arana de la Cal against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-271/05)

(2005/C 229/67)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Miriam Arana de la Cal, resident in Saint-Gilles (Belgium), represented Lucas Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 30 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in her capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 30 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in her capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in her capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in her capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Fernandez Tunon

Commission

---
# Zambia

		Subscribe		

81 items

        -    		Zambia	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		Relief and Development Coherence	   
        -    Report  		Zambia	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    		Improving Patient Antiretroviral Therapy Retention through Community Adherence Groups in Zambia	  February 7, 2018 
        -    		Improving Patient Antiretroviral Therapy Retention through Community Adherence Groups in Zambia	  February 7, 2018 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1…56789next page

Back to Top
HomeTanzania

# Tanzania

98 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: International School of Tanganyika: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda	  February 14, 2024 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Tanzania	  November 29, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		This Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Every Week, the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs Works to Build Sustainable Businesses Worldwide	  November 17, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: International School of Tanganyika: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Tanzania	  August 10, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Statement on the 25th Anniversary of the Embassy Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken at a Commemoration for the 25th Anniversary of the U.S. Embassy Bombings in Tanzania and Kenya	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023National Museum of American DiplomacyWashington, D.C. 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Deliver Remarks at the Commemoration of the 25th Anniversary of the U.S. Embassy Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania	  August 4, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 

123…10next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Driving Regional Cooperation: US Senior Officials Meet APEC Counterparts in Detroit for APEC Second Officials’ Meeting

# 									Driving Regional Cooperation: US Senior Officials Meet APEC Counterparts in Detroit for APEC Second Officials’ Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 15, 2023

U.S. officials will travel to Detroit, Michigan, from May 14-26 to participate in the Second Senior Officials’ Meeting (SOM2) and related meetings of the U.S. APEC 2023 host year.

U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg will chair the APEC Transportation Ministerial Meeting from May 15-17, and United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai will chair the Ministers Responsible for Trade Meeting from May 25-26.

The upcoming APEC SOM2 cluster in Detroit will build on the success of the previous cluster held in February in Palm Springs, California. With dozens of workshops, dialogues, field visits, and meetings planned, the U.S. government aims to cover a wide range of topics, including:
        - Sara Minkara, Special Advisor on International Disabilities Rights (SAIDR), will chair a dialogue on the economic inclusion of persons with disabilities. SAIDR Minkara will also speak to transportation ministers about the importance of inclusion in the transportation sector.
        - Ambassador Nina Hachigian, U.S. Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy, will lead a discussion and Secretary Buttigieg will deliver keynote remarks on electric vehicle infrastructure financing by minority-serving institutions.
        - Ambassador Chris Lu, U.S. Representative to the United Nations for U.N. Management and Reform, will deliver a keynote address on the need for cooperation among multilateral and intergovernmental institutions to adopt policies that promote universal and labor rights and address the education and employment needs of underserved populations.
        - U.S. Senior Official for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Matt Murray will attend the APEC Second Officials’ Meeting (SOM2) and engage with counterparts and local stakeholders from diverse sectors to foster collaboration and achieve the United States’ host year goals of creating a more interconnected, innovative, and inclusive APEC region.

These meetings will lay the foundation for continued cooperation among APEC economies and will play a crucial role in advancing this year’s APEC theme of “Creating a Resilient and Sustainable Future for All.”

The United States is committed to hosting a productive and meaningful SOM2 and looks forward to welcoming APEC economies to Detroit to continue this important work.

Learn more about the U.S. APEC 2023 host year here and follow us on LinkedIn.

For further information, please contact the U.S. APEC Team at USAPEC2023@state.gov.

###

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationMichiganOffice of the SpokespersonSubnational Diplomacy Unit

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 587.510 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( a ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( b ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( c ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing; and
( d ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.