alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3196 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3196

To increase the penalty for trafficking in powdered cocaine to the same 
 level as the penalty for trafficking in crack cocaine, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1996

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the penalty for trafficking in powdered cocaine to the same 
 level as the penalty for trafficking in crack cocaine, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

    Section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
841(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``5 kilograms'' 
        and inserting ``50 grams''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``500 grams'' and 
        inserting ``5 grams''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO SENTENCING GUIDELINES.

    Pursuant to section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, the 
United States Sentencing Commission shall promulgate guidelines or 
amend existing guidelines to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |
|--------|--------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY  /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Connie Woods Hawkins     |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |  Date:  August 6, 2009     |

|   | of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital Corporation and will be |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | retained by Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | upon request. |
|--------|---------------|
#### § 401.625 Effect of CMS claims collection decisions on appeals.

Any action taken under this subpart regarding the compromise of a claim, or suspension or termination of collection action on a claim, is not an initial determination for purposes of CMS appeal procedures.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.77 Certified nurse-midwives' services: Qualifications and conditions. ( a ) *Qualifications.* For Medicare coverage of his or her services, a certified nurse-midwife must: ( 1 ) Be a registered nurse who is legally authorized to practice as a nurse-midwife in the State where services are performed;
( 2 ) Have successfully completed a program of study and clinical experience for nurse-midwives that is accredited by an accrediting body approved by the U.S. Department of Education; and
( 3 ) Be certified as a nurse-midwife by the American College of Nurse-Midwives or the American College of Nurse-Midwives Certification Council.
( b ) *Services.* A certified nurse-midwife's services are services furnished by a certified nurse-midwife and services and supplies furnished as an incident to the certified nurse-midwife's services that— ( 1 ) Are within the scope of practice authorized by the law of the State in which they are furnished and would otherwise be covered if furnished by a physician or as an incident to a physician's service; and
( 2 ) Unless required by State law, are provided without regard to whether the certified nurse-midwife is under the supervision of, or associated with, a physician or other health care provider.
( c ) *Incident to services: Basic rule.* Medicare Part B covers services and supplies incident to the services of a certified nurse-midwife if the requirements of § 410.26 are met.
( d ) *Professional services.* A nurse-midwife can be paid for professional services only when the services have been performed personally by the nurse-midwife. ( 1 ) Supervision of other nonphysician staff by a nurse-midwife does not constitute personal performance of a professional service by the nurse-midwife.
( 2 ) The services of a certified nurse-midwife are provided on an assignment-related basis, and the certified nurse-midwife may not charge a beneficiary in excess of the amounts permitted under 42 CFR 424.55. If a beneficiary has made payment for a service in excess of these limits, the certified nurse-midwife must refund the full amount of the impermissible charge to the beneficiary.
( 3 ) A nurse-midwife may provide services that he or she is legally authorized to perform under State law as a nurse-midwife, if the services would otherwise be covered by the Medicare program when furnished by a physician or incident to a physicians' professional services.
( e ) *Medical record documentation.* For certified nurse-midwives' services, the certified nurse-midwife may review and verify (sign and date), rather than re-document, notes in a patient's medical record made by physicians; residents; nurses; medical, physician assistant, and advanced practice registered nurse students; or other members of the medical team, including, as applicable, notes documenting the certified nurse-midwife's presence and participation in the service.
[63 FR 58909, Nov. 2, 1998, as amended at 78 FR 74811, Dec. 10, 2013; 84 FR 63191, Nov. 15, 2019; 86 FR 65665, Nov. 19, 2021]
#### J. O. and R. G., Juveniles, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1908.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1980.

*967Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

J.O. and R.G., adjudicated, delinquent by having committed an attempted robbery, contend that the circumstantial evidence relied on by the State was insufficient to support the adjudications. We agree and reverse.

The totality of the State’s evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to it, shows (a) the presence of these juveniles at the scene when a third person attempted to snatch a woman’s purse, (b) their later participation in the obnoxious behavior of taunting the woman, and (c) their flight upon the arrival of a police car. The juveniles did not touch the victim, nor did they say or do anything to assist the perpetrator in his efforts to take the purse.

Since the evidence of the intent of the juveniles to participate in the commission of the crime is entirely circumstantial, it must not only be consistent with guilt, but also inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. *Pack v. State,*381 So.2d 1199 (2d DCA 1980); *K.W.U. v. State,*367 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Neither presence at the scene, *Pack v. State, supra; Chaudoin v. State,*362 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), nor flight from the scene, *Pack v. State, supra; J. H. v. State,*370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Williams v. State,*206 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), nor other equivocal after-the-fact behavior, *Douglas v. State,*214 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), is sufficient, even in combination with each other, to exclude reasonable hypotheses of innocence.

Reversed.
§ 2.61 Legal effect of order. ( a ) *Effect.* An order of a court of competent jurisdiction entered under this subpart is a unique kind of court order. Its only purpose is to authorize a use or disclosure of patient information which would otherwise be prohibited by 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2 and the regulations in this part. Such an order does not compel use or disclosure. A subpoena or a similar legal mandate must be issued to compel use or disclosure. This mandate may be entered at the same time as and accompany an authorizing court order entered under the regulations in this part.
( b ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) A person holding records subject to the regulations in this part receives a subpoena for those records. The person may not use or disclose the records in response to the subpoena unless a court of competent jurisdiction enters an authorizing order under the regulations in this part.
( 2 ) An authorizing court order is entered under the regulations in this part, but the person holding the records does not want to make the use or disclosure. If there is no subpoena or other compulsory process or a subpoena for the records has expired or been quashed, that person may refuse to make the use or disclosure. Upon the entry of a valid subpoena or other compulsory process the person holding the records must use or disclose, unless there is a valid legal defense to the process other than the confidentiality restrictions of the regulations in this part.
[89 FR 12629, Feb. 16, 2024]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)


                             WALL STREET DELI, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Percentage
                                         State of                   of Voting
                                       Incorporation                Securities
                                                                      Owned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                          <C>
Sandwich Chef of Alabama, Inc.            Alabama                      100%

Downtown Food Service, Inc.              Tennessee                     100%

Sandwich Chef of Colorado, Inc.           Colorado                     100%

Sandwich Chef of Texas, Inc.               Texas                       100%(a)

Sandwich Chef of D.C., Inc.              Delaware                      100%

Sandwich Chef of Illinois, Inc.          Illinois                      100%

Sandwich Chef of Louisiana, Inc.         Louisiana                     100%
</TABLE>


---------------
(a)      Wholly-owned subsidiary of Sandwich Chef of Colorado, Inc.


                                       66
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge,

 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

 the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant for the periods presented.



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | May 9, 2007
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 0 2

- 10

- 00 175

- CV

ILVA NICHOLE GREENIDGE APPELLANT

V.

KEVIN ANTONY GREENIDGE APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

On September 7, 2010, we notified Appellant Ilva Nichole Greenidge that

her brief did not comply with state appellate rules 9.4(h) and 38.1( a), (c), (d), (f),

(g), (i), (j), and (k), 2 nor did it comply with subsections A and E of this court’s local

appellate rule 1. 3 We allowed Appellant until September 17, 2010

, to file an

1 See Tex. R. App. 47.4.

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a), (c), (d), (f), (g), (i)

- (k).

3 See 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1(A), (E).2

amended brief that complied with the above rules. We stated in our letter to

Appellant that her failure to timely file an amended brief in compliance with the

above rules could result in the waiver of noncomplying points, our striking her

brief, or the dismissal of her appeal. 4 Appellant has not filed an a mended brief.

Accordingly, we strike Appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution. 5

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 14, 2010

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).

5 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, September 1, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items to be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Person to Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-21340 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
.DEPARTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ?^^'^^;^£;f ION ^ C L# P I l/ C T 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS' ' "''' ^"'^^i V CL 

WASHINGTON^DC -, .,. ^ -, ^A^' , 3 2W| 

' ^ '•' ' HEAR/NG DOCKET 

Federal Aviation Administration * ' 

* 

Complainant * 

V. * 

* FAA Docket No. CPIOSOOOIO 

Magni Industries, Inc, * FAA Case No. 2010SO700313 

Respondent * 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

COMPLAINANT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY 

Pursuant to Section 13.220 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions 

(14 C.F.R. § 13.220), the Complainant, by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby 

requests that Respondent respond immediately to the following Interrogatories and 

Requests for Production: 

INTERROGATORIES 

1. Please state the name, occupation, address, and phone number of each 

person Respondent intends to call as a witness in this proceeding. State the subject 

matter to which each witness will testify and include a summary of the expected 

testimony of each witness. 

2. Please state the name, occupation, address, and phone number of each 

witness who is expected to present expert testimony. Include a summary of the expected 
2. Please state the name, occupation, address, and phone number of each 

witness who is expected to present expert testimony. Include a summary of the 

expected testimony including facts and opinions. Also state the basis for the opinion 

including but not limited to a description of any documents, reports, records, or 

tangible evidence relied upon. 

3. Please state the name, address, and phone number of each employee or 

agent of Respondent responsible for accepting, transporting, or offering the alleged 

shipment of hazardous materials, his or her title while employed with Respondent, and 

the responsibilities of his or her position. 
REOUESTS FOR PRODUCTION 

1. Please provide a copy of each exhibit that Respondent intends to 

introduce into evidence at trial. 

2. Please provide a copy of any hazardous material training records 

maintained by Magni Industries or any of its agents, at the time of this incident, for the 

employees involved in this incident. 

Respectililly Submitted this juQ day of February, 2011. 

GEkALD A. ELLIS 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Complainant's First Request for Discovery has been 

mailed by certified mail to the following: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

(original + 1 copy) 

(1 copy) 

Todd R. Palmer, General Manager 

Magni Industries, Inc., Respondent 

109250 Toebben Drive 

Independence Ave., KY 41051 

TEL: 859-746-1777 

FAX: 859-746-1170 

(1 copy) 

Regional Counsel 

FEB Z 5 2011 

Dated
#### § 2.36 Disclosures to prescription drug monitoring programs.

A part 2 program or other lawful holder is permitted to report any SUD medication prescribed or dispensed by the part 2 program to the applicable state prescription drug monitoring program if required by applicable state law. A part 2 program or other lawful holder must obtain patient consent to a disclosure of records to a prescription drug monitoring program under § 2.31 prior to reporting of such information.

[85 FR 43038, July 15, 2020]
§ 137.365 What is the procedure for the Secretary's review and approval of project planning and design documents submitted by the Self-Governance Tribe? ( a ) The Secretary shall review and approve planning documents to ensure compliance with planning standards identified in the construction project agreement. The Secretary shall review and approve design documents for general compliance with requirements of the construction project agreement.
( b ) The Secretary shall promptly notify the Self-Governance Tribe in writing of any concerns or issues that may lead to disapproval. The Secretary shall share relevant information and documents, and make a good faith effort to resolve all issues and concerns of the Self-Governance Tribe. If, after consultation with the Self-Governance Tribe, the Secretary intends to disapprove the documents, then the Secretary shall follow the procedures set forth in § 137.333.
( c ) The time allowed for Secretarial review, comment, and approval of planning and design documents is 21 days, unless otherwise agreed to by the Self-Governance Tribe in writing. Absence of a written response by the Secretary within 21 days shall be deemed approved.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3128

To make it unlawful to send lobbying communications to Congress which

are fraudulent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 1996

Mr. FLANAGAN (for himself and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To make it unlawful to send lobbying communications to

Congress which are fraudulent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FRAUDULENT LOBBYING COMMUNICATIONS.

4 (a) PROVISION.—Whoever—

5 (1) with the intent to influence action by a

6 House of Congress or any Member of Congress on

7 any nomination or legislation;

8 (2) engages in any conduct whereby a pur9 ported communication of the opinion of an identified

10 individual respecting such action is made to a Mem-
2

•HR 3128 IH

1 ber of Congress in any telegram, letter, or electronic

2 communication; and

3 (3) knows that such individual did not in fact

4 authorize such communication;

5 shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000.

6 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘nomination or leg7 islation’’ means any nomination pending before the Senate

8 or any legislation being considered by either House of

9 Congress or a committee of either House of Congress.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef11 fect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ