alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          14,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,097
<SALES>                                         72,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,110
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         169,509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,091,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,133,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 480,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,725,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,124,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 27,500,000
<COMMON>                                       105,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,843,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,725,270
<SALES>                                      7,416,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,416,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,039,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,276,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,579,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,696,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,696,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Two Ansarallah Leaders in Yemen

# 									Designation of Two Ansarallah Leaders in Yemen							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 2, 2021

Ansarallah, sometimes referred to as the Houthis, plays a significant role in the conflict in Yemen and exacerbates the dire humanitarian plight of the Yemeni people.  The war has destabilized the country, displaced four million Yemenis since the beginning of the conflict, and unleashed one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.

We strongly condemn Ansarallah’s continued assault on Marib and their attacks in the region, including a complex attack on February 27, which threatened civilian areas with several UAVS and a missile attack on Riyadh.  Again, on March 1 Ansarallah attacked the Saudi city of Jazan and injured five civilians.

Today, the United States is taking action to respond to this behavior.  We are designating two Ansarallah leaders pursuant to Executive Order 13611, “Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen,” Mansur Al-Sa’adi and Ahmad Ali Ahsan al-Hamzi.  These senior Ansarallah leaders have used their positions – as Naval Forces Chief of Staff and Commander of the Air Force and Air Defense Forces, respectively – to procure weapons from Iran and to oversee attacks threatening civilians and maritime infrastructure.

Iran’s involvement in Yemen fans the flames of the conflict, threatening greater escalation, miscalculation, and regional instability.  Ansarallah uses Iranian weapons, intelligence, training, and support to conduct attacks threatening civilian targets and infrastructure in Yemen and Saudi Arabia.

The United States has made clear our commitment to promoting accountability for Ansarallah’s malign and aggressive actions, which include exacerbating conflict in Yemen, attacking our partners in the region, kidnapping and torturing civilians, preventing humanitarian aid access, repressing the Yemeni people in areas they control, and orchestrating deadly attacks beyond Yemen’s borders.

We will ensure Saudi Arabia and our regional partners have the tools they need to defend themselves, including against threats emanating from Yemen that are carried out with weapons and support from Iran.  At the same time, the United States is working diligently at senior levels alongside the United Nations and others to bring an end to this conflict. We urge all parties to work in good faith towards a lasting political solution, the only way to end the conflict, and address the terrible humanitarian crisis faced by the people of Yemen.

For additional information on today’s designations, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateTerrorist DesignationYemen

Back to Top
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

LORENZO JUAREZ,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00125-CV

Appeal from the

388th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2022DCV1835)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion to dismiss the appeal and concludes 

the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. 

We further order that costs of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same as stated in 

the joint motion and this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
# C_2006060EN.01003301.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-58/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/67)

Language of the case: Swedish

Language of the case: Swedish

By order of 22 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-58/05: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden.

---

(1)  OJ C 93 of 16.04.2005.

1

---
#### § 137.22 May the Secretary consider uncorrected significant and material audit exceptions identified regarding centralized financial and administrative functions?

Yes, if the Indian Tribe chooses to centralize its self-determination or self-governance financial and administrative functions with non-self-determination or non-self-governance financial and administrative functions, such as personnel, payroll, property management, etc., the Secretary may consider uncorrected significant and material audit exceptions related to the integrity of a cross-cutting centralized function in determining the Indian Tribe's eligibility for participation in the self-governance program.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7589

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE BUSH, President; STATE OF WEST

VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WARDEN

OF THE WEST VIRGINIA STATE PRISON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-01-48-3)

Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Robert Demos, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Robert Demos, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion in Bar or in the Alternative a Special Motion.”

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Demos v. Bush, No. CA-01-48-3 (N.D.W.

Va. Aug. 17, 2001). We note that, to the extent that Demos seeks

to challenge a Washington conviction, the federal district court in

the Southern District of West Virginia lacks jurisdiction to

consider a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition

challenging that conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (1994). We

deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2005268EN.01001602.xml

| 28.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3649 — Finmeccanica/Baes Avionics & Communications)

(2005/C 268/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3649. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3649. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

    - **PCMSC Home**
    - Research
    - Technology and Tools
    - Data
    - Publications
    - Field Activities
    - News
    - Multimedia
    - Education and Outreach
    - About Us
    - Contacts and Personnel

**Coastal and Marine Geology Program**Pacific Coastal and Marine Science CenterSt. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science CenterWoods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center
    -  Search PCMSC:					 All USGSThis site only 

Sound Waves Newsletter Cover Story: Coral Reefs, El Niño, and Climate Change: An Interview with Lauren Toth

# Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

## Center News

click here

# Studying Recent Tsunami Deposits in Icy Bay, Alaska

# What a Drag: The Global Impact of Bottom Trawling

# Examining the Chemistry of Seawater and Coral to Promote the Health of West Maui’s Coral Reefs

# USGS Briefed Congressman Adam Schiff’s Staff Members on Geologic Hazards in Southern California

# USGS CoSMoS team wins Point Blue Outstanding Partner Award

# Briefing on seafloor mapping and coastal change hazards for Representative Sam Farr in Monterey, California

# USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Program website wins award!

# Collaborative Study in the Ningaloo Reef

   See all of our Home Page Features.

We conduct multidisciplinary scientific research in the coastal and offshore areas of California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii, and other US Pacific Islands; and in other waterways of the United States.

### Featured Photo

Cerulean damselfish darting around lettuce coral

 

### PCMSC Seminar Series

Please join us for scientific talks and presentations given by local scientists and researchers.

https://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/seminar/

Weds., July 20th, 2016, 10:00 am

Janet Watt

Research Geophysicist, USGS Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

Missing Link between the Hayward and Rodgers Creek Faults

See a list of all Seminars previously presented.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey				URL: https://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/				Page Contact Information: Laura Zink Torresan				Page Last Modified: 18 July 2016 (lzt)
<PAGE>

                                                      EXHIBIT 10.57

                       DESCRIPTION OF CHIRON'S 1995
             EXECUTIVE OFFICER VARIABLE COMPENSATION PROGRAM


      Decisions on compensation (base salary and variable compensation) of 
Chiron Corporation's ("Chiron" or the "Company") executive officers are made 
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Except to the extent 
provided under the Chiron Corporation 1995 Executive Officer Variable Cash 
Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee has based its decisions 
regarding compensation in fiscal year 1995 for executive officers as a group, 
on (i) a qualitative evaluation of the Company's overall performance in 1995, 
including the strategic repositioning of the Company's business units (the 
acquisition and integration of Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp. into Chiron 
Diagnostics, the acquisition and integration of IOLAB's surgical business 
into Chiron Vision, the acquisition and integration of Viagene, Inc. into 
Chiron Technologies) and the development and implementation of strategic 
initiatives to position each business unit for sustainable and profitable 
growth and to play an important role in the markets it serves; (ii) analysis of
compensation programs and amounts paid for comparable benchmark positions in 
other biotechnology, high technology and pharmaceutical companies; and (iii) 
subjective assessment of each executive officer's individual performance and, 
where relevant, the performance of the officer's business unit or functional 
area of responsibility.


      For 1995, the Compensation Committee continued the Company's approach 
that base salaries for executive officers should be measured by reference to 
the median (50th percentile) of salaries for benchmark positions in 
comparator companies. Further, the Compensation Committee provided that a 
significant portion of total cash compensation (salary plus variable cash 
compensation) in the form of annual variable cash compensation potential 
should be "at risk", dependent on individual, business unit, and overall 
Company performance. Variable cash compensation for executive officers 
overall was targeted to yield total cash compensation at the 50th percentile, 
but with the opportunity up to 75th percentile, of total cash compensation as 
shown by comparative data.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John W. ANTONOWICZ.

No. 80-K-2667.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 21, 1980.

In re John W. Antonowicz, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, *1238and for stay order. Parish of Vernon. No. 30832.

Denied.
# Kuwait

91 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Applauds the Kyrgyz Republic’s Repatriation of its Nationals from Northeast Syria	  Matthew MillerOctober 24, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Following the Ministerial Meeting of the United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)	  September 19, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Applauds the Kyrgyz Republic’s Repatriation of its Nationals from Northeast Syria	  Matthew MillerAugust 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Kuwait	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Kuwait	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Al Sabah	  May 11, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Salem Al Sabah Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 11, 2023Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Al Sabah	  March 28, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kuwait	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Ian C. Moss’ Remarks to Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS FTF Working Group	  Ian MossMarch 7, 2023Kuwait City, Kuwait 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
# Dominica

48 items

        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Dominica	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Eastern Caribbean Summary	   
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Dominica	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Dominica	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Dominica	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Dominica (19-812) – Agreement on Foreign Account Tax Compliance	  August 12, 2019 
        -    Report  		Dominica	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		Chicago Convention, Trilingual Protocol, and Quadrilingual Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Dominica, March 22, 2019	   
        -    Report  		Dominica	  June 21, 2019 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
exv10wxdy






Exhibit 10(d)




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     This Second Amendment to the Illinois Tool Works Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
is made as of the 13th day of February, 2009 by the Board of Directors of Illinois Tool
Works Inc. (the “Company”).



R E C I T A L S




     The Plan, which was approved by the Board of Directors on February 10, 2006, amended by the
Board of Directors on May 5, 2006, approved by the Stockholders on May 5, 2006, and amended by the
Board of Directors on February 8, 2008, is an amendment and restatement of the Illinois Tool Works
Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the same meaning as in the Plan.



S E C O N D A M E N D M E N T




     Section 8(a), Grant of Restricted Stock Units is hereby amended and superseded in its entirety
to read as follows:




“Restricted Stock Units may be granted to Participants on terms and conditions
set forth by the Committee which may include, without limitation, provisions
for (i) the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units, (ii) the lapse of
restrictions in the event of death, disability, retirement or other specified
event, (iii) the payment of vested Restricted Stock Units in the form of an
equivalent number of shares of Common Stock or cash, and (iv) whether
additional Restricted Stock Units shall be credited to each Participant with
respect to the Participant’s current Restricted Stock Units, to reflect
dividends paid to stockholders of the Company with respect to its Common
Stock. A Participant who has been granted Restricted Stock Units shall not be
entitled to any voting or other stockholder rights with respect to shares of
Common Stock attributable to Restricted Stock Units until such time as the
shares are issued by the Company to the Participant.
#### ROBERT O’BRIEN RUSSELL, INC., a Florida Corporation and Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. Jimmie BLACKMON, Appellee.

No. 79-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 9, 1979.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick' & Knight and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for appellants.

Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Ro-senthal & Zientz and Arnold D. Hessen, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Allred v. Crittendon Pool Supply, Inc.,*298 So.2d 361 (Fla.1974); *Bishop v. Watson,*367 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Nelson v. Reliance Insurance Co.,*368 So.2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); *Davis v. Lewis,*331 So.2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Metropolitan Dade County v. Dillon,*305 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). See also *State v. Jones,*204 So.2d 515 (Fla.1967).