alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 15, 2006.



/s/ Robert W. McMartin

Robert W. McMartin

Chief Financial Officer
vrs-ex101_9.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

Verso Corporation

Corporate Headquarters

8540 Gander Creek Drive

Miamisburg, OH 45342

 

Randy J. Nebel


T 937.528.3455

E Randy.Nebel@versoco.com

W www.versoco.com

 

March 5, 2021

 

Allen J. Campbell

Verso Corporation

8540 Gander Creek Drive

Miamisburg, OH 45342

 

Dear Allen:

 

I appreciate your hard work and continued commitment to Verso, including your willingness to extend your time with Verso and delay your retirement until the end of June 2021.  

 

As we discussed, Verso is awarding you a retention bonus of $325,000. This amount, less withholding taxes, will be paid out on June 30, 2021. Also, the unvested restricted stock units previously granted to you by Verso will be modified to allow some additional limited vesting after your retirement, as set forth in the Attachment to this letter. To receive the retention bonus and modification of your restricted stock units, you must not voluntarily terminate your employment with Verso before June 30, 2021.

 

As you know, when you retire you will be entitled to payments and benefits to the extent provided in your Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 21, 2015, but you will not be entitled to any payments under Verso’s Severance Policy. 

 

Congratulations on your upcoming retirement, Allen. 

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Randy J. Nebel

 

Randy J. Nebel

President and Chief Executive Officer




 



ATTACHMENT

 

 

The restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that you were granted under Verso’s Performance Incentive Plan (“PIP”) will be modified as follows, subject to all other terms and conditions of the applicable restricted stock unit award agreements (each, an “Award Agreement”) and the PIP:

 

 


		
	
Time Vesting RSUs

	
Date of Award Agreement 
	
Modification

	
February 22, 2018
	
The next tranche of RSUs scheduled to vest under the applicable Award Agreement that remain unvested will accelerate and become fully vested as of the final date of your employment with the Company.

	
March 28, 2019

	
January 24, 2020

	
 




 

 


		
	
Performance Vesting RSUs

	
Date of Award Agreement 
	
Modification

	
March 28, 2019
	
The number of RSUs remaining unvested under the applicable Award Agreement as of the final date of your employment with the Company will be adjusted using the formula in section 7(c) of such Award Agreement, and the resulting number of RSUs will vest if and when the vesting conditions (except the employment requirement) in the Award Agreement are met.

	
January 24, 2020

	
 




 

 

 

 

2
§ 401.132 Materials in field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, SSA. ( a ) *Materials available for inspection.* The following materials are available for inspection in the field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, SSA. ( 1 ) Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations (including the public information regulation of the Department of Health and Human Services).
( 2 ) Regulations of the Social Security Administration and CMS.
( 3 ) Title 5, United States Code.
( 4 ) Compilation of the Social Security Laws.
( 5 ) CMS Rulings.
( 6 ) Social Security Handbook.
( b ) *Handbook available for inspection and copying.* The Office of Hearings and Appeals Handbook is available for inspection and copying in the field offices of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
HomeChina

# China

902 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining	  April 25, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Discussion with Business Leaders	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 25, 2024ShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Discussion with NYU Shanghai Students	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 24, 2024ShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 24, 2024Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 24, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 24, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    		Travel to the People’s Republic of China, April 24-26, 2024	   
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 23, 2024	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior Bureau Official for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Ambassador Robert Gilchrist on the 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices	  Robert S. GilchristApril 22, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 22, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) - Macau	  April 22, 2024 

previous page12345…91next page

Back to Top
693 A.2d 583

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, v. ALTOONA CITY AUTHORITY, City of Altoona, and American Premier Underwriters, Inc., v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP., Pennsylvania Electric Co., Redevelopment Authority of Altoona, Union Tank Car Co., and Simon Resources, Inc.,

No. 29 Middle District Appeal Docket 1997.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 29, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 1997, the direct appeal is quashed.
§ 583.506 Investment and reinvestment of certain funds. Subject to the requirements of § 583.203, U.S. financial institutions are authorized to invest and reinvest assets blocked pursuant to § 583.201, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The assets representing such investments and reinvestments are credited to a blocked account or subaccount that is held in the same name at the same U.S. financial institution, or within the possession or control of a U.S. person, but funds shall not be transferred outside the United States for this purpose;
( b ) The proceeds of such investments and reinvestments shall not be credited to a blocked account or subaccount under any name or designation that differs from the name or designation of the specific blocked account or subaccount in which such funds or securities were held; and
( c ) No immediate financial or economic benefit accrues (e.g., through pledging or other use) to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 583.201.
# Mali

93 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mali	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mali	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees and Vulnerable Populations in Mali, Mauritania, and Niger	  April 5, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Reported Massacre in Mali	  Ned PriceApril 3, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 1, 2022	  Ned PriceFebruary 1, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY21 IRF: Advocacy to Preserve Religious and Cultural Heritage in the Trans-Sahel Region	  December 22, 2021 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Mali	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Potential Deployment of the Wagner Group in Mali	  Ned PriceDecember 15, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Attack on Civilians in Mali	  Ned PriceDecember 5, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Alassane Samba Diop and Mamadou Ibra Kane of E-Media Group	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 20, 2021U.S. EmbassyDakar, Senegal 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
HomeSweden

# Sweden

249 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 6, 2024Crete, Greece 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish President Erdogan	  January 6, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  January 6, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Swedish Foreign Minister Billström	  January 4, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 20, 2023Press Briefing RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 18, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 18, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  December 17, 2023 

previous page12345…25next page

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.372 AKI dialysis payment rate.

The amount of payment for AKI dialysis services shall be the base rate for renal dialysis services determined for such year under section 1881(b)(14), that is, the ESRD base rate as set forth in § 413.220, updated by the ESRD bundled market basket percentage increase factor minus a productivity adjustment as set forth in § 413.196(d)(1), adjusted for wages as set forth in § 413.231, and adjusted by any other amounts deemed appropriate by the Secretary under § 413.373.
# C_2005330EN.01002102.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2005 — Leite Mateus v Commission

(Case T-51/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Career development report - Assessment period 2001/2002)

(2005/C 330/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Carlos Alberto Leite Mateus (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

Annulment of the appeal assessor's decision of 14 March 2003, setting out the applicant's career development report for the assessment period 2001/2002.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004

1

---
#### Ex Parte John Larry ASBILL. (Re: John Larry Asbill v. State of Alabama).

80-102.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

SHORES, Justice.

Writ denied. No opinion.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
# Pakistan

295 items

        -    Report  		Pakistan	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Stabilization Assistance Review: A Framework for Maximizing the Effectiveness of U.S. Government Efforts To Stabilize Conflict-Affected Areas	  July 5, 2018 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Pakistan	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		International Religious Freedom Program (Summary)	  March 25, 2016 

previous page1…252627282930next page

Back to Top
§ 137.17 May more than one Indian Tribe participate in the same compact and/or funding agreement? Yes, Indian Tribes may either: ( a ) Each sign the same compact and/or funding agreement, provided that each one meets the criteria to participate in self-governance and accepts legal responsibility for all financial and administrative decisions made under the compact or funding agreement, or
( b ) Authorize another Indian Tribe to participate in self-governance on their behalf.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46295-46296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 21, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

[[Page 46296]]

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, October 21, 2009, at 
2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact 
Mrs. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 31, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-21445 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 412.50 Furnishing of inpatient hospital services directly or under arrangements. ( a ) The applicable payments made under the prospective payment systems, as described in subparts H and M of this part, are payment in full for all inpatient hospital services, as defined in § 409.10 of this chapter. Inpatient hospital services do not include the following types of services: ( 1 ) Physician services that meet the requirements of § 415.102(a) of this chapter for payment on a fee schedule basis.
( 2 ) Physician assistant services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act.
( 3 ) Nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act.
( 4 ) Certified nurse mid-wife services, as defined in section 1861(gg) of the Act.
( 5 ) Qualified psychologist services, as defined in section 1861(ii) of the Act.
( 6 ) Services of an anesthetist, as defined in § 410.69 of this chapter.
( b ) CMS does not pay any provider or supplier other than the hospital for services furnished to a beneficiary who is an inpatient, except for the services described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section.
( c ) The hospital must furnish all necessary covered services to the beneficiary either directly or under arrangements (as defined in § 409.3 of this chapter).
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 38527, Sept. 30, 1988; 57 FR 39821, Sept. 1, 1992; 60 FR 63188, Dec. 8, 1995; 65 FR 18537, Apr. 7, 2000]
# C_2005330EN.01001502.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/15

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 October 2005 — CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission

(Case T-324/00) (1)

1

(State aid - Misuse of aid - Risk of circumvention of the order for recovery - Recovery of aid from the companies which acquired the operating assets from the original beneficiary)

(2005/C 330/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant(s): CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH (Albrechts, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmidt-Kötters and D. Uwer, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K.-D. Borchardt and V. Kreuschitz, Agents, assisted by C. Koenig)

Defendant(s):

:

Intervener(s) in support of the applicant(s): Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: W.-D. Plessing and T. Jürgensen, Agents, assisted by R. Bierwagen, lawyer)

Intervener(s) in support of the applicant(s):

Intervener(s) in support of the defendant(s): ODS Optical Disc Service GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: I. Brinker and U. Soltész, lawyers)

Intervener(s) in support of the defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of Commission Decision 2000/796/EC of 21 June 2000 on State aid granted by Germany to CDA Compact Disc Albrechts GmbH, Thuringia (OJ 2000 L 318, p. 62).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2(3) of Commission Decision 2000/796/EC of 21 June 2000 on State aid granted by Germany to CDA Compact Disc Albrechts GmbH, Thuringia; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2(3) of Commission Decision 2000/796/EC of 21 June 2000 on State aid granted by Germany to CDA Compact Disc Albrechts GmbH, Thuringia;

| 2. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the remainder of the action for annulment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the remainder of the action for annulment;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and the costs of CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH. The Federal Republic of Germany and ODS Optical Disc Service GmbH are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and the costs of CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH. The Federal Republic of Germany and ODS Optical Disc Service GmbH are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 C 355.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.112 Documentation of conformance. ( a ) *Acceptable documentation.* CMS may require a GHP or LGHP to demonstrate that it has complied with the Medicare secondary payer provisions and to submit supporting documentation by an official authorized to act on behalf of the entity, under penalty of perjury. The following are examples of documentation that may be acceptable: ( 1 ) A copy of the employer's plan or policy that specifies the services covered, conditions of coverage, benefit levels and limitations with respect to persons entitled to Medicare on the basis of ESRD, age, or disability as compared to the provisions applicable to other enrollees and potential enrollees.
( 2 ) An explanation of the plan's allegation that it does not owe CMS any amount CMS claims the plan owes as repayment for conditional or mistaken Medicare primary payments.
( b ) *Lack of acceptable documentation.* If a GHP or LGHP fails to provide acceptable evidence or documentation that it has complied with the MSP prohibitions and requirements set forth in § 411.110, CMS may make a determination of nonconformance for both the year in which the services were furnished and the year in which the request for information was made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8014

STEPHEN LUCI, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

THOMAS L. MCBRIDE, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE 

OF WEST VIRGINIA; DAVID BALLARD, Warden, 

 Respondents – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert E. Maxwell, 

Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00011-REM-JES) 

Submitted: May 18, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Stephen Luci, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Deputy 

Attorney General, Robert David Goldberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Stephen Luci appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. Because the 

district court granted a certificate of appealability, we review 

all claims properly preserved by Luci on appeal on their merits. 

We have thoroughly examined the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Luci v. McBride, No. 3:07-cv-00011-REM-JES 

(N.D. W. Va. Aug. 26, 2008). Although we grant Luci’s motion to 

exceed page limits for his informal brief, we dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED