alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 553.502 Effect of license or other authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by OFAC, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of such license or other authorization, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license is issued by OFAC and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any other part of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license specifically refers to such part.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property that would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
( d ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to supersede the requirements established under any other provision of law or to relieve a person from any requirement to obtain a license or other authorization from another department or agency of the U.S. government in compliance with applicable laws and regulations subject to the jurisdiction of that department or agency. For example, exports of goods, services, or technical data that are not prohibited by this part or that do not require a license by OFAC nevertheless may require authorization by the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of State, or other agencies of the U.S. government.
( e ) No license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
( f ) Any payment relating to a transaction authorized in or pursuant to this part that is routed through the U.S. financial system should reference the relevant OFAC general or specific license authorizing the payment to avoid the blocking or rejection of the transfer.
(MARYLANDDEPARTMENTOFTHEENVIRONMENTA1800WashingtonBoulevard•BaltimoreMD21230WitI410-537-3000•1-800-633-6101MartinO’MalleyShariT.WilsonGovernorSecretaryAnthonyG.BrownRobertM.Summers,Ph.D.LieutenantGovernorAPR202010DeputySecretaryR1(J1ONlitIICLIIJ!ON.L,,l),llNJ;IAPR1Mr.ShawnM.GarvinUSEPAREGION31650ArchStreetMailCode:3RAOOPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Garvin,Section110(a)oftheCleanAirActrequiresthateachStateImplementationPlan(SIP)providefortheimplementation,maintenance,andenforcementoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS).ThisletterpertainstoCleanAirActSection110(a)(2)(G)regardingthe1997PM2.5NationalAmbientAirQualityStandard(NAAQS)andthe2006PM2.5NAAQS.Withrespecttoadequatecontingencyplansrequiredpursuanttosection110(a)(2)(G),bythisletterMDEcertifiesthatMaryland’scurrentSIPmeetssuchrequirementsforpurposesofthe1997PM2.5NAAQSandthe2006PM2.5NAAQSbecausenospecificemergencyepisodeplansarenecessarygiventhatexistingmonitoredlevelsofPM2.5havenotexceededthelevelof140.4microgramspercubicmeterasidentifiedbyEPAinitsSeptember25,2009GuidanceonSIPElementsRequiredUnderSections,,‘110(a)(1)and(2)forthe200624hourFineParticle(PM2.5)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS).IfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisletterpleasecontactMr.George(Tad)S.Aburn,Jr.,DirectorofAirandRadiationManagementAdministrationat410-537-3255orbyemailatgaburn(mde.state.md.us.Sincerely,7Uz—Secretarycc:George(Tad)S.AburnJr.,Director,AirandRadiationManagementAdministrationDianeFranks,ProgramManager,AirQualityPlanningProgramBrianHug,DeputyProgramManager,AirQualityPlanningProgram.RecycledPaperwww.mde.state.md.usTTYUsers1-800-735-2258ViaMarylandRelayService
§ 2.68 Report to the Secretary. ( a ) Any investigative agency covered by this part shall report to the Secretary, not later than 60 days after the end of each calendar year, to the extent applicable and practicable, on: ( 1 ) The number of applications made under §§ 2.66(a)(3)(ii) and 2.67(c)(4) during the calendar year;
( 2 ) The number of instances in which such applications were denied, due to findings by the court of violations of this part during the calendar year; and
( 3 ) The number of instances in which records under this part were returned or destroyed following unknowing receipt without a court order, in compliance with § 2.66(a)(3)(iii), (iv), or (v), respectively during the calendar year.
( b ) [Reserved]
[89 FR 12631, Feb. 16, 2024]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting With the Republic of the Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Kabua and Select Compact Negotiation Delegation Members

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting With the Republic of the Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Kabua and Select Compact Negotiation Delegation Members							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

July 29, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary Wendy Sherman met in Washington today with the Republic of the Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Kitlang Kabua and a group of Compact of Free Association negotiation delegation members.  The Deputy Secretary and the Foreign Minister discussed ways to expand and grow the U.S.-Republic of the Marshall Islands bilateral relationship. They discussed progress on the Compact negotiations, the impact of COVID-19 on the Marshallese people and diaspora, and promoting economic growth and stability in the Pacific Island region. The Deputy Secretary underscored the importance of successfully concluding the Compact negotiations and the strength of united Pacific voices and leadership through international fora such as the Pacific Island Forum.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateMarshall IslandsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 590.507 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 590.508, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 590.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 590.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 590.507 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
# C_2006018EN.01002401.xml

| 25.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/24

---

Training of national judges in EC competition law and judicial cooperation between national judges

(2006/C 18/11)

A new call for proposals on TRAINING OF NATIONAL JUDGES IN EC COMPETITION LAW and JUDICIAL COOPERATION BETWEEN NATIONAL JUDGES has been published on:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/competition/proposals2/

Deadline for application: 13.3.2006.

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 01, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 01, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0039. TITO HERNANDEZ v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 11B1276
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 February 2006

(2006/C 51/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.123 Payment for screening mammography performed by hospitals on an outpatient basis. ( a ) *Basis and scope.* This section implements section 1834(c)(1)(C) of the Act and establishes the method for determining Medicare payment for screening mammographies performed by hospitals.
( b ) *Payment to hospitals for outpatient services.* Payment to hospitals for screening mammography services performed on an outpatient basis is determined in accordance with the technical component billing requirements in § 405.534(d) of this chapter.
[55 FR 53522, Dec. 31, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 49834, Sept. 30, 1994]
Docket No: FAA-2016-3986 Dir ID: 2015-NM-147-AD
696 A.2d 805

#### Terry L. HARMON, Petitioner, v. MIFFLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent (Two Cases).

Nos. 0716, 0717 Middle District Allocatur Docket 1996.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1997.

Lester H. Zimmerman, Jr., Lewistown, for Petitioner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

*228
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED but LIMITED to the following issues:

> (1) Is there substantial evidence supporting Petitioner’s discharge for improper conduct?

> (2) If the Commonwealth Court properly held that substantial evidence supports Petitioner’s discharge, should it have remanded the case to the trial court to address Petitioner’s estoppel argument?

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### § 136a.51 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable to the use of Federal funds in providing health services to Indians in accordance with the provisions of subparts A, B, C, H, I and J of this part.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Samuel
Zell, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Company, certify that
(i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and the results of operations of Tribune
Company.













By:
              /s/ Samuel
      ZellSamuel
      Zell
                Chairman
      and
                Chief
      Executive OfficerMay
      8, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December  31, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  February 11, 2005
HomeIndia

# India

438 items

        -    TIAS  		India (18-920.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		India	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		India	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		India	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		India	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 
        -    Report  		India	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		India	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		India	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		India	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…3738394041…44next page

Back to Top
HomeEstonia

# Estonia

97 items

        -    TIAS  		Estonia (22-1221) – Protocol Amending and Extending Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation	  December 21, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 14, 2022	  Vedant PatelDecember 14, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation with Estonia	  November 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Peter Harrell,  Senior Director for International Economics and Competitiveness, Ruth Berry,  Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Information and Communications Policy,  and Peter A. Winn,  Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer	  October 7, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on FIRST Program Cooperation at the 2022 NPT Review Conference	  August 25, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 11, 2022	  Vedant PatelAugust 11, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Estonian Foreign Minister Reinsalu	  August 2, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 28, 2022	  Ned PriceJuly 28, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Estonia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Estonia	  July 19, 2022 

previous page12345…10next page

Back to Top
HomeVietnam

# Vietnam

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

190 items

        -    DS Memorial  		Darwin Judge	  April 29, 1975 
        -    		Johnie  Thomas	  January 31, 1968 
        -    		William Michael  Sebast	  January 31, 1968 
        -    		Owen Edward  Mebust	  January 31, 1968 
        -    		James Conrad  Marshall	  January 31, 1968 
        -    DS Memorial  		Johnie Thomas	  January 31, 1968 
        -    DS Memorial  		William Michael Sebast	  January 31, 1968 
        -    DS Memorial  		Owen Edward Mebust	  January 31, 1968 
        -    DS Memorial  		Charles Lincoln Daniel	  January 31, 1968 
        -    DS Memorial  		James Conrad Marshall	  January 31, 1968 

previous page1…171819

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   By:/s/ Michael R. TuttleMichael R. Tuttle
President & Chief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2009Date
#### Robert Lee SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. KK-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 5, 1978.

Elwin R. Thrasher, Jr., of Dye & Thrasher, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

*870PER CURIAM.

Simmons pleaded guilty to six counts of armed robbery and one count of attempted murder in the first degree. His court-appointed attorney and the prosecutor negotiated the pleas upon an agreement that the prosecutor would recommend concurrent sentences. After ascertaining the factual basis for the pleas, questioning Simmons closely concerning his understanding of the recommended concurrent sentences, advising him that the sentences could be for life, the court accepted Simmons’ pleas, received and considered a presentence investigation report, and sentenced Simmons to six concurrent life terms and one consecutive ten-year term for attempted murder. Simmons later filed a motion to vacate the sentences, Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.850, alleging that the pleas were unlawfully induced and not made voluntarily, that the plea agreement, according to his counsel, was for lesser sentences, and that Simmons was denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court reviewed the record of the proceedings, changed the consecutive sentence for attempted murder to a concurrent sentence, and otherwise found that the records conclusively show that Simmons is entitled to no relief. On Simmons’ appeal, we found that the court’s order lacked attached copies “of that portion of the files and records which conclusively [show] that the prisoner is entitled to no relief . . . .” Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.850. We therefore ordered the record supplemented, and have examined the transcripts of the plea and sentencing proceedings. Those transcripts show that the pleas were freely and voluntarily made, with understanding of the consequences. The plea bargain was stated in the record.

Simmons’ claim that he was deprived of an appeal by the default of his court-appointed private counsel was not cognizable by the trial court on a Rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., ERVIN, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.