alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Todd B. Barnum, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 January 17, 2007
    
    /s/Todd B. BarnumTodd B. Barnum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.
§ 405.1132 Request for escalation to Federal court. ( a ) If the Council does not issue a decision or dismissal or remand the case to an ALJ or attorney adjudicator within the adjudication period specified in § 405.1100, or as extended as provided in this subpart, the appellant may request that the appeal, other than an appeal of an ALJ or attorney adjudicator dismissal, be escalated to Federal district court. Upon receipt of a request for escalation, the Council may— ( 1 ) Issue a decision or dismissal or remand the case to an ALJ or attorney adjudicator, if that action is issued within the latter of 5 calendar days of receipt of the request for escalation or 5 calendar days from the end of the applicable adjudication time period set forth in § 405.1100; or
( 2 ) If the Council is not able to issue a decision or dismissal or remand as set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, it will send a notice to the appellant acknowledging receipt of the request for escalation and confirming that it is not able to issue a decision, dismissal or remand order within the statutory time frame.
( b ) A party may file an action in a Federal district court within 60 calendar days after the date it receives the Council's notice that the Council is not able to issue a final decision, dismissal order, or remand order unless the party is appealing an ALJ or attorney adjudicator dismissal.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65338, Dec. 9, 2009; 82 FR 5124, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### § 802.209 Conversion.

The term *conversion* means the exercise of a right inherent in the ownership or holding of a particular financial instrument to exchange any such instrument for an equity interest.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Wall Street
Acquisitions Corp’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: | September
    6, 2022 | /s/
    Jimmy Ramirez
|----- | --------------------- | ---------------------
|      |                       | Name:                
|      |                       | Title:               



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 312

To prohibit funding to carry out the Appalachian Regional Development

Act of 1965.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. KLUG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure and, in addition, to the Committee

on Banking and Financial Services for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit funding to carry out the Appalachian Regional

Development Act of 1965.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That no funds may be appropriated to carry out the Appa4 lachian Regional Development Act of 1965 for any fiscal

5 year beginning after September 30, 1995.

Æ
*

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky,

sitting by designation.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

File Name: 08a0190p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________

GERARD F. KOLPACKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CSX PENSION PLAN; CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.;

CSX CORPORATION; CSX CORPORATION

COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL PLAN; CSX

CORPORATION GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PLAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

X

-

-

-

-

>

,

-

-

-

-

-

N

No. 07-1959

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.

No. 05-73734—Victoria A. Roberts, District Judge.

Argued: May 2, 2008

Decided and Filed: May 21, 2008 

Before: KENNEDY and MARTIN, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Senior District Judge.*

_________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Randall E. Phillips, PROVIZER & PHILLIPS, P.C., Bingham Farms, Michigan, for

Appellant. G. Christopher Bernard, BODMAN, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:

Randall E. Phillips, Marilyn A. Madorsky, PROVIZER & PHILLIPS, P.C., Bingham Farms,

Michigan, for Appellant. G. Christopher Bernard, BODMAN, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellees.

_________________

OPINION _________________

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Gerald F. Kolpacke appeals

the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on his claim of wrongful

denial of benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132

et seq. Kolpacke alleges that defendants arbitrarily and capriciously denied his claimed benefits by

misapplying the relevant pension plan. The district court granted summary judgment in defendants’

favor because Kolpacke had failed to show that defendants’ had arbitrarily and capriciously applied

the terms of the pension plan in calculating Kolpacke’s estimated benefits. 

1
No. 07-1959 Kolpacke v. CSX Pension Plan, et al. Page 2

We have carefully read the parties’ briefs, the applicable law, and the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to defendants and its order denying plaintiff’s motion for

reconsideration, and we agree no genuine issues of material fact exist and defendants are entitled

to judgment as a matter of law on Kolpacke’s claim. Because the district court’s decisions are

well-reasoned, we see no reason to embellish upon its opinions. Therefore, we AFFIRM the district

court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on Kolpacke’s ERISA claim for the reasons stated

in the district court’s orders.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          62,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,082,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,076,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                 341,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,662,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,074,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 32,500,000
<COMMON>                                       105,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,600,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,662,732
<SALES>                                     23,772,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,772,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,140,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             335,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,296,559
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,342,424
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,638,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                19,638,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 405.1018 Submitting evidence. ( a ) *When evidence may be submitted.* Except as provided in this section, parties must submit all written or other evidence they wish to have considered with the request for hearing, by the date specified in the request for hearing in accordance with § 405.1014(a)(2), or if a hearing is scheduled, within 10 calendar days of receiving the notice of hearing.
( b ) *Effect on adjudication period.* If a party submits written or other evidence later than 10 calendar days after receiving the notice of hearing, any applicable adjudication period specified in § 405.1016 is extended by the number of calendar days in the period between 10 calendar days after receipt of the notice of hearing and the day the evidence is received.
( c ) *New evidence.* ( 1 ) Any evidence submitted by a provider, supplier, or beneficiary represented by a provider or supplier that is not submitted prior to the issuance of the QIC's reconsideration determination must be accompanied by a statement explaining why the evidence was not previously submitted to the QIC, or a prior decision-maker (see § 405.1028).
( 2 ) If a statement explaining why the evidence was not previously submitted to the QIC or a prior decision-maker is not included with the evidence, the evidence will not be considered.
( d ) *When this section does not apply.* ( 1 ) The requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to oral testimony given at a hearing, or to evidence submitted by an unrepresented beneficiary.
( 2 ) The requirements in paragraph (c) of this section do not apply to oral testimony given at a hearing, or to evidence submitted by an unrepresented beneficiary, CMS or any of its contractors, a Medicaid State agency, an applicable plan, or a beneficiary represented by someone other than a provider or supplier.
[82 FR 5113, Jan. 17, 2017]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10310 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ESTEBAN JUAREZ-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-105-ALL-J

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed for Juan Esteban Juarez-Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Juarez has not responsed to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 99.4

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert W. McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Robert W. McMartin
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Robert W. McMartin
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                        August 14, 2003




This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,009,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,256,778
<PP&E>                                         243,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,539,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          732,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,298
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,697,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,539,841
<SALES>                                        159,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,679
<CGS>                                           32,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               902,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (30,898)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (744,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (744,574)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (744,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.27
​

​
​
THIS DEED is made BETWEEN:
​
(1)BICYCLETX LIMITED a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales with company number 11036101 and its registered office at Building 900, Babraham Research Campus, Babraham, Cambridgeshire, CB22 3AT, United Kingdom (the “BicycleTX”); and
​
		(2)	[EXECUTIVE NAME] of [executive address] (the “Executive”), 	

​
together, the “Parties”.
​
RECITALS:
​
(A)The Parties entered into a Service Agreement on [DATE], as amended and/or amended and restated from time to time (the “Service Agreement”).
​
(B)The Service Agreement provides that the Executive’s salary be denominated in USD and converted and paid in GBP.
​
(C)The Parties wish to amend the Service Agreement so that the Executive’s salary shall be calculated and paid in GBP, effective on and from 1 January 2021.
​
IT IS AGREED as follows:
​

1.The Parties hereby agree that the Service Agreement shall be amended such that, effective on and from 1 January 2021, the Executive’s salary shall be established and paid in GBP and that Executive’s Salary on and from 1 January 2021 (subject to review in accordance with the terms of the Service Agreement) shall be GBP[●].
​
2.Save as provided herein, the terms of the Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
​
[Remainder of page intentionally blank]
​

​



​



Exhibit 10.27
​

​
​
​
​
Executed and delivered as a Deed by BICYCLETX LIMITED acting by a director:
​
​
(Director)




​
on: ​ ​day of ​ ​2021
​
in the presence of:
​
​


​
Witness Name: Witness Address:
​


​
​
​
​
Executed and delivered as a Deed by:
[EXECUTIVE NAME]:
​
​


​
Name:
​
on: ​ ​day of ​ ​2021
​
in the presence of:
​
​


​
​
Witness Name: Witness Address:

​



​
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon Travels to Boston, Massachusetts and Portsmouth, New Hampshire

# 									Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon Travels to Boston, Massachusetts and Portsmouth, New Hampshire							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 10, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon will travel March 10-11 to Boston, Massachusetts, and Portsmouth, New Hampshire.  In Boston, he will visit the Boston Passport Agency and the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Boston Field Office.  Deputy Secretary McKeon will also meet with Afghans who are employed by local resettlement agencies, some of whom recently arrived themselves under Operation Allies Welcome.  He will also hear from local resettlement agencies and state government officials about initiatives to develop community sponsors and address housing challenges in the Boston area.  In Portsmouth, New Hampshire, accompanied by Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs Rena Bitter, Deputy Secretary McKeon will visit the National Visa Center and the National Passport Center, which provide critical consular services for U.S. citizens and their family members in addition to other immigrant visa applicants from around the world.

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic SecurityDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesDiplomatic SecurityImmigrationMassachusettsNew HampshireOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top