alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1318 Subgroups. ( a ) *Eligibility and special status* — ( 1 ) *General.* Except as provided under paragraph (a)(2) of this section and subject to paragraph (a)(4) of this section, for a MIPS payment year, determinations of meeting the low-volume threshold criteria and special status for a subgroup is determined at the group level in accordance with §§ 414.1305 and 414.1310.
( 2 ) *Exclusions.* An individual eligible clinician or group that elects to participate in MIPS as a MIPS eligible clinician in accordance with § 414.1310(b)(1)(iii)(A) or (b)(2) is not eligible to participate in a subgroup.
( 3 ) *Single subgroup per eligible clinician.* An individual eligible clinician (as represented by a TIN-NPI combination) may register for no more than one subgroup within a group's TIN.
( 4 ) *Subgroup determination period.* CMS will apply the low-volume threshold criteria for a subgroup as described under paragraph (a)(1) of this section using information from the initial 12-month segment of the applicable MIPS determination period.
( b ) *Final score.* Except as provided under § 414.1317(b) and paragraph (b)(1) of this section, each MIPS eligible clinician in the subgroup receives a final score based on the subgroup's combined performance. ( 1 ) CMS will not assign a final score for a subgroup that registers and does not submit data as a subgroup for the applicable performance period.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Subgroup reporting requirements.* For individual eligible clinicians to participate in MIPS as a subgroup, all of the following requirements must be met: ( 1 ) Individual eligible clinicians that elect to participate in MIPS as a subgroup must aggregate their quality and improvement activities performance data across the subgroup's identifier.
( 2 ) Individual eligible clinicians that elect to participate in MIPS as a subgroup will have their performance assessed at the subgroup level across all the MIPS performance categories based on an MVP in accordance with § 414.1365. Subgroups that are MVP Participants must adhere to an election process described in § 414.1365(b).
[86 FR 65671, Nov. 19, 2021; as amended at 87 FR 70227, Nov. 18, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3203 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3203

   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
 States Code, to follow certain procedures in seeking medical opinions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1996

  Mr. Bilbray (for himself and Ms. Dunn of Washington) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the administrative agency responsible for adjudicating 
 claims under the workers' compensation provisions of title 5, United 
 States Code, to follow certain procedures in seeking medical opinions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAL OPINIONS.

    The administrative agency to which the Secretary of Labor has 
delegated the authority to adjudicate claims made under the workers' 
compensation provisions of title 5, United States Code, shall in 
seeking a second medical opinion in such a claim select physicians on 
an impartial basis.
                                 <all>
```
From: Lapcevic, Joseph P
To: Jordan, Ronald
Cc: Thomas Finseth ; Schroeder, Cuc ; Flanders, Phillip ; Cannon, William E Subject: RE: Available for a short call on Monday?
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 8:44:44 AM
Attachments: Hatfield 306Data 11-29-2011_to_04-28-2014jpl.xlsx

Ron, I added our Beta Lab’s MDL and PQL values to my previously provided Excel spreadsheet (attached). As discussed, zeros were used in place of the <MDL to calculate monthly average values. I haven’t had an opportunity to review the data again, but will do a cursory review before the end of the week and let you know if I find any issues. Take care, 

### Joe Lapcevic Supervisor, Water Permitting (724) 838 – 6099 work (234) 678 – 2385 fax FirstEnergy Corp. 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601-1689

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:20 PM

To: Lapcevic, Joseph P
Cc: Thomas Finseth; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip Subject: Available for a short call on Monday?

Joe,
Are you available for a short call on Monday? We have just a few more questions, including these listed below:

1. Comparing the data you provided on 5/2/2014 and 5/13/2014, we observed apparent data entry errors. Please specify which values for mercury Chem Precip Effluent are correct.

Date 5/2/2014 dataset (Hg, ng/L) 5/13/2014 dataset (Hg, ng/L) 12/20/2011 122 12.2 1/3/2012 424 42.4 2/2/2012 144 14.4 2/21/2012 170 17

2. What is the cause for elevated mercury concentrations for Chem Precip Effluent on the following dates?

a. 2/28/2012 (1520 ng/L) b. 3/13/2012 (1160 ng/L)

c. 3/20/2012 (1710 ng/L) d. 3/27/2012 (1320 ng/L)

e. 4/3/2012 (3400 ng/L)f. 6/5/2012 (830 ng/L)

3. We noticed dates for Method 245.1 (mercury) data and Method 200.8 (arsenic) data changed between your original spreadsheet provided 2/20/2014 and the updated spreadsheets provided 5/2/2014 and 5/13/2014. Specifically, the 2/20/2014 spreadsheet shows the 245.1 and 200.8 data on 12/18/12, 1/4/13, and 1/8/13; the 5/2/2014 spreadsheet shows these data on 11/29/12, 12/19/12, and 12/21/12. Which dates are correct?



### The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
HomeKyrgyzstan

# Kyrgyzstan

96 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Tajikistan Foreign Minister Sirojiddin Muhriddin Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 27, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Trudeau Travels to Nepal, the United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan	  September 27, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Kyrgyz Republic 	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Kyrgyzstan	  July 27, 2022 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		TIP Office National Referral Mechanism (NRM) Evaluation [PDF]	  July 25, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Kyrgyz Republic	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu’s Travel to the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan	  May 22, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya with AKI Press in the Kyrgyz Republic	  Uzra ZeyaApril 15, 2022InterviewBishkek, Kyrgyz Republic 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kyrgyz Republic	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Zeya Travel to Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic	  April 7, 2022 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
HomeSouth Africa

# South Africa

175 items

        -    TIAS  		South Africa (12999) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Military Information	  November 20, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		South Africa (12955) – Agreement Concerning Mutual Cooperation in the Area of Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control	  May 20, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		South Africa (97-1228) – Convention Regarding Double Taxation and Taxes on Capital Gains	  December 28, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		South Africa (12834) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  February 17, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		South Africa (12825) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on Defense Trade Controls	  January 24, 1997 

previous page1…161718

Back to Top
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-102061, 333-63212, 333-13451, 333-26433, 333-42048,
333-42050 and 333-44758) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-102843, 333-62684 and
333-65699) of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 2003
(except for Note 14, as to which the date is January 30, 2003), with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc.
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 25, 2003
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Announces Online Publication of 2021 Digest of United States Practice in International Law

# 									Department of State Announces Online Publication of 2021 Digest of United States Practice in International Law							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 30, 2022

The Department of State is pleased to announce the release of the 2021 Digest of United States Practice in International Law, covering developments during calendar year 2021. Edited by the Office of the Legal Adviser, the Digest provides the public with a record of the views and practice of the U.S. Government in public and private international law. The official edition of the 2021 Digest is available exclusively on the Department of State website at: https://www.state.gov/digest-of-united-states-practice-in-international-law/.  Past Digests covering 1989 through 2020 are also available online.

The Digest traces its history back to an 1877 treatise by John Cadwalader, which was followed by multi-volume encyclopedias covering selected areas of international law. The Digest later came to be known to many as “Whiteman’s” after Marjorie Whiteman, the editor from 1963-1971.  Beginning in 1973, the Office of the Legal Adviser published the Digest on an annual basis, changing its focus to developments current to the year. Although publication was temporarily suspended after 1988, the Office of the Legal Adviser resumed publication in 2000 and has since produced volumes covering 1989 through 2020.

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonUnited States

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# C_2006048EN.01003003.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 December 2005 — Rounis v Commission

(Case T-274/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Staff report - Action for annulment - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Late drawing-up of the staff report)

(2006/C 48/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Georgios Rounis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Application for

Firstly, annulment of the appeal assessor's decision to confirm the applicant's staff reports for the periods 1997/1999 and 1999/2001 and, secondly, damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims for annulment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims for annulment;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 3 500; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 3 500;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of those incurred by the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 21.10.2004.

1

---
HomePress Releases...Designating Iran Sanctions Evasion Networks

# 									Designating Iran Sanctions Evasion Networks							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 9, 2023

We are imposing sanctions on a “shadow banking” network of 39 entities across multiple jurisdictions.  These multi-jurisdictional illicit finance systems provide sanctioned Iranian entities access to the international financial system and enable them to obfuscate their trade with foreign customers.  Today’s actions, which the Department of the Treasury is undertaking pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846, demonstrate our commitment to enforce our sanctions on the Iranian regime and disrupt the foreign networks upon which it relies to evade U.S. sanctions.

Iranian currency exchange houses create front companies abroad to enable trade on behalf of their Iranian clients and help them evade U.S. sanctions.  Companies utilizing these networks have generated tens of billions of dollars for the Iranian regime across a variety of fields.

The United States will continue to disrupt attempts to evade U.S. sanctions, and we will use the tools at our disposal to protect both the U.S. and international financial system.

For more information about these designations, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Samoan Prime Minister Fiame

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Samoan Prime Minister Fiame							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

September 14, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman met yesterday with Samoan Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mataʻafa at the Pacific Island Conference of Leaders in Honolulu, Hawaii.  The Deputy Secretary and the Prime Minister discussed U.S.-Samoa cooperation and the Deputy Secretary’s recent trip to the region in August, where the two first met.  They also highlighted the importance of strengthening ties and support for the Pacific Islands Forum.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonRegional IssuesSamoa

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 279

To categorize payments from lobbyists to, or on behalf of, Members of

Congress as bribery under Federal criminal law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To categorize payments from lobbyists to, or on behalf of,

Members of Congress as bribery under Federal criminal law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOBBYIST PAYMENTS TO, OR ON BEHALF OF,

4 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS BRIBERY UNDER

5 FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW.

6 Any payment of money or any other thing of value

7 to, or on behalf of, a Senator or Representative in, or Del8 egate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress from a

9 professional lobbying organization or individual profes-
2

•HR 279 IH

1 sional lobbyist for legislation shall constitute bribery under

2 Federal criminal law.

Æ
# C_2006063EN.01003601.xml

| 16.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/36

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4025 — ATEL/EOSH)

(2006/C 63/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4025. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4025. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 405.534 Limitation on payment for screening mammography services. The provisions in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section apply for services provided from January 1, 1991 until December 31, 2001. Screening mammography services provided after December 31, 2001 are paid under the physician fee schedule in accordance with § 414.2 of this chapter. ( a ) *Basis and scope.* This section implements section 1834(c) of the Act by establishing a limit on payment for screening mammography examinations. There are three categories of billing for screening mammography services. Those categories and the payment limitations on each are set forth in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) *Global or complete service billing representing both the professional and technical components of the procedure.* If a fee is billed for a global service, the amount of payment subject to the deductible is equal to 80 percent of the least of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the service.
( 2 ) The amount established for the global procedure for a diagnostic bilateral mammogram under the fee schedule for physicians' services set forth at part 414, subpart A.
( 3 ) The payment limit for the procedure. For screening mammography services furnished in CY 1994, the payment limit is $59.63. On January 1 of each subsequent year, the payment limit is updated by the percentage increase in the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) and reflects the relationship between the relative value units for the professional and technical components of a diagnostic bilateral mammogram under the fee schedule for physicians' services.
( c ) *Professional component billing representing only the physician's interpretation for the procedure.* If the professional component of screening mammography services is billed separately, the amount of payment for that professional component, subject to the deductible, is equal to 80 percent of the least of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the professional component of the service.
( 2 ) The amount established for the professional component of a diagnostic bilateral mammogram under the fee schedule for physicians' services.
( 3 ) The professional component of the payment limit for screening mammography services described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
( d ) *Technical component billing representing other resources involved in furnishing the procedure.* If the technical component of screening mammography services is billed separately, the amount of payment, subject to the deductible, is equal to 80 percent of the least of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the technical component of the service.
( 2 ) The amount established for the technical component of a diagnostic bilateral mammogram under the fee schedule for physicians' services.
( 3 ) The technical component of the payment limit for screening mammography services described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
[55 FR 53521, Dec. 31, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 49833, Sept. 30, 1994; 66 FR 55328, Nov. 1, 2001]
# CA2006078EN.01000101.xml

| 31.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 78/1

---

COMPETITION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL (COMP)

COMPETITION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL (COMP)

Publication of a vacancy for a Chief Competition Economist (Grade A*14) — Brussels

Post for a temporary agent pursuant to Article 2(a) of the Conditions of employment of other Servants

COM/2006/10019

(2006/C 78 A/01)

The Commission is seeking a replacement for its Chief Competition Economist, whose mandate expires on 1 September 2006 in the Directorate-General for Competition.

To be eligible, candidates must:

| — | be a citizen of a European Union Member State, |
| --- | --- |

—

be a citizen of a European Union Member State,

| — | hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies and a doctorate in a branch of economics or econometrics relevant to competition policy, |
| --- | --- |

—

hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies and a doctorate in a branch of economics or econometrics relevant to competition policy,

| — | have at least 15 years' postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission including at least 10 years at a senior level in fields relevant to the post, |
| --- | --- |

—

have at least 15 years' postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission including at least 10 years at a senior level in fields relevant to the post,

15 years' postgraduate

10 years

| — | have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages. |
| --- | --- |

—

have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages.

The Chief Competition Economist will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities for A*14 temporary agents. This is a temporary assignment for three years, and is not renewable. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at:

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

If you wish to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

and follow the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration.

The closing date for registration is 28 April 2006. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

28 April 2006

---