alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005240EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 September 2005

(2005/C 240/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2063 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4626 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68260 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3715 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5578 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,72 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8160 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5731 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,610 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9009 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5527 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,53 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,870 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6270 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5831 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3590 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7386 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0362 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6876 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7626 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4345 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 430,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,548 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,462 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,529 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2063

JPY

Japanese yen

135,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4626

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68260

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3715

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5578

ISK

Iceland króna

75,72

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8160

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5731

CZK

Czech koruna

29,610

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9009

RON

Romanian leu

3,5527

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,53

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,870

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6270

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5831

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3590

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7386

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0362

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,05

ZAR

South African rand

7,6876

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7626

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4345

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 430,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,548

PHP

Philippine peso

67,462

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3800

THB

Thai baht

49,529

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints William C. Niegsch,
Jr., Mark F. Emerson and Todd B. Barnum as his or her attorneys or any of them
individually as his or her attorney, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and
in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended October 26,
1998, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation
hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as
its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 8th day of
December, 1998.


SIGNATURE                                 TITLE
---------                                 -----

*/s/ Todd B. Barnum                       Chairman, President, Chief Executive 
--------------------------------          Officer and Director
     Todd B. Barnum            

*/s/ Mark F. Emerson                      Chief Operating Officer and Director
---------------------------------
     Mark F. Emerson

*/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.              Executive Vice President, Chief 
--------------------------------          Financial Officer, Treasurer, 
     William C. Niegsch, Jr.              Secretary and Director 


*/s/ William E. Arthur                    Director
---------------------------------
     William E. Arthur

*/s/ Robert A. Rothman                    Director
---------------------------------
     Robert A. Rothman

*/s/ Roger D. Blackwell                   Director
---------------------------------
     Roger D. Blackwell

*/s/ Donald W. Kelley                     Director
---------------------------------
     Donald W. Kelley

*/s/ Michael D. Murphy                    Director
---------------------------------
     Michael D. Murphy

*/s/ Thomas R. Green                      Director
---------------------------------
     Thomas R. Green
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: November 10, 2005



By: /S/ Randall Jones
-------------------------------------
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report ofPaulson Capital Corp., Inc.” (Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Karen L. Johannes   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Karen L. Johannes       |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 29, 2006     |   |

 

----
#### § 1003.900 Basis for civil money penalties.

The OIG may impose a penalty against any person who it determines in accordance with this part is involved in the possession or use in the United States, receipt from outside the United States or transfer within the United States, of select agents and toxins in violation of sections 351A(b) or (c) of the Public Health Service Act or 42 CFR part 73.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Robert A. Lindeman, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 January 25, 2008
    /s/ Robert A. LindemanRobert A. LindemanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Max & Ermas Restaurants, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Dennis J. FitzSimons, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Company, certify that (i)
Tribune Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations
of Tribune Company.



| | /s/ 
        Dennis J. FitzSimons         Dennis J. FitzSimons     
           Chairman, President and         Chief Executive Officer  
                  July 30, 2004
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Costs: 

Action 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Register ed and close-up) our) Products 

MCD Inspection 1 $0 67 

Line 6 Gear 8.0 $12,480 36 Replacement 

Line 7 Gear 8.0 $7,680 40 Replacement 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of co mpliance for U.S. flee t: 5>81 3,855 

Costs covered under warrant) (if /mown) $ -

O n-Condition Costs: @ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g .. Inspection, (include access. (fai$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and close- up) 

I 

8 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

e ither a Yes or No answer. G 

YESO NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. ls it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 0 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

9
# CA2005197EN.01000301.xml

| 12.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 197/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 197/3

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/21-22/05 to constitute a reserve of heads of unit (A*9 and A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the following fields: internal market, external relations, management of research programmes, management of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, management of sustainable resources

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005

(2005/C 197 A/01)

On page 15, heading B, point 1(a):

for:

for:

| ‘(a) | A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your verbal reasoning skills.
  This test will be marked out of 50.
  (Time allowed: 45 minutes)’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your verbal reasoning skills.

This test will be marked out of 50.

(Time allowed: 45 minutes)’,

read:

read:

| ‘(a) | A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your verbal reasoning skills.
  This test will be marked out of 50.
  (Time allowed: 1 hour)’; |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your verbal reasoning skills.

This test will be marked out of 50.

(Time allowed: 1 hour)’;

on page 15, heading B, point 1(b):

for:

for:

| ‘(b) | A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your numerical reasoning skills.
  This test will be marked out of 50.
  (Time allowed: 45 minutes)’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your numerical reasoning skills.

This test will be marked out of 50.

(Time allowed: 45 minutes)’,

read:

read:

| ‘(b) | A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your numerical reasoning skills.
  This test will be marked out of 50.
  (Time allowed: 1 hour)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

A test comprising a series of multiple-choice questions to assess your general ability, in particular your numerical reasoning skills.

This test will be marked out of 50.

(Time allowed: 1 hour)’.

---
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.64 Additional preventive services. ( a ) Medicare Part B pays for additional preventive services not described in paragraph (1) or (3) of the definition of “preventive services” under § 410.2, that identify medical conditions or risk factors for individuals if the Secretary determines through the national coverage determination process (as defined in section 1869(f)(1)(B) of the Act) that these services are all of the following: ( 1 ) Reasonable and necessary for the prevention or early detection of illness or disability.
( 2 ) Recommended with a grade of A or B by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.
( 3 ) Appropriate for individuals entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under Part B.
( b ) In making determinations under paragraph (a) of this section regarding the coverage of a new preventive service, the Secretary may conduct an assessment of the relation between predicted outcomes and the expenditures for such services and may take into account the results of such an assessment in making such national coverage determinations.
[73 FR 69933, Nov. 19, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 73615, Nov. 29, 2010]
#### § 3.514 Authority to settle.

The Secretary has exclusive authority to settle any issue or case without the consent of the ALJ.
#### § 802.223 Housing unit.

The term *housing unit* means a single family house, townhome, mobile home or trailer, apartment, group of rooms, or single room that is occupied as a separate living quarters, or, if vacant, is intended for occupancy as a separate living quarters.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                               [CROWE CHIZEK LOGO]



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-24977 and
Registration No. 333-51417), of our report dated February 11, 2000 on the
consolidated financial statements of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc., which
report is included in the 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Michigan
Bancorp, Inc.



                                         /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


South Bend, Indiana
March 22, 2000
#### THE BOROUGH OF ORADELL, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS, BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, AND HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.

Argued May 3, 1939

Decided August 14, 1939.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

For the prosecutor, *George W. Babcock.*

For the respondent Hackensack Water Co., *Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison (William J. Morrison, Jr.).*

*87Per Curiam.

*Certiorari*was allowed in this case to review a judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals dismissing the appeal of the borough of Oradell, county of Bergen. The return to the writ shows an assessment levied on the properties of the Hackensack Water Company for the year 1937 in the amount of $2,654,335, made up by assessment on land, $392,140; improvement, $2,111,349; personal property of $150,846. A reduction in the amount of $475,000 was asked in the petition of appeal, part on land and part on the improvement.

Annexed to the petition of appeal filed with the county board was a statement signed by Fred Mueller, the assessor of the borough of Oradell, saying that the mayor and council of the borough of Oradell had agreed to the reduced valuation as requested and further that he (the assessor) “acquiesced in the adjustment of the appeal,” and requested that the County Board of Taxation issue judgment accordingly, which was done.

This petition of appeal, according to the proofs in the depositions, was neither served on the counsel for nor the clerk of the borough. It follows therefore that the county board acquired no jurisdiction whatever for failure of such service of the petition of appeal on those representative officials of the taxing authority, as required by *statute*— B. *S.*54:3-21, *et seq.*The judgment of the county board, in the circumstances, was a nullity. The taxing authority, however, appealed to the state board to he met by the objection on the part of the Water Company that the remedy was by *certiorari*only. The state board concluded that that was so; that it had no authority to reverse, review or modify a judgment invalid because of want of jurisdiction in-the county board and dismissed the appeal. We think the judgment of the state board was right. See *Mellor*v. *Kaighn,*89 *N. J. L.*543, and *Shrewsbury*v. *Merchants Steamboat Co.,*76 *Id.*407.

We notice that the writ in this case is directed to the judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals, the order and determination of the Bergen County Board of Taxation and the Hackensack Water Company, as to its petition of appeal in the first instance. This is erroneous practice. The writ *88should take up the last judgment in the case. What preceded it, if pertinent, is properly included in the return. On this technical ground the writ should have been dismissed; but our judgment is for an affirmance of the State Board of Tax Appeals, which results here in a dismissal of the writ, with costs.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeOffice of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation...About Us – Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation

# 									About Us – Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation							

The Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation leads working-level U.S. government efforts to impede, roll back, and eliminate the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons, missile delivery systems for weapons of mass destruction, and related equipment, materials, and technology. Accordingly, MBC leads departmental and interagency efforts to develop, integrate, coordinate, and implement bilateral and multilateral policies and programs to fight the proliferation of CBW and missiles capable of delivering WMD. The office works closely with National Security Staff and other agencies, including the Departments of Commerce, Defense, Energy, Homeland Security, Justice, Treasury, and the intelligence community in carrying out its mission. MBC leads U.S. participation in the Australia Group CBW nonproliferation regime, the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation, and the Missile Technology Control Regime.

Back to Top