alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re ESTATE of Augustus H. BERGMANN, Deceased. TECHNICOLOR, INC., Appellant, v. Theodore G. BERGMANN and Johanna R. Bergmann, as Executors of the Estate of Augustus H. Bergmann, Deceased, Appellees.

Nos. 74-458 and 74-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellant.

David R. Serns, North Miami Beach, Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and NATHAN, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The orders under review should be affirmed under the doctrine of equitable re-tainage. There is a duty upon executors to discharge a legatee’s indebtedness to the estate before any distributions. See: 26A C.J.S. Descent & Distribution § 141, wherein the following is found:

> * * * * * *

> “Where the indebtedness of heirs and distributees to the estate may be deducted from their shares, * * * such deductions are in preference to the claims of their other creditors. The rights of an attaching creditor of a distributee of the estate, with or without notice of the distributee’s indebtedness to the estate, are no better than those which the dis-tributee would have had if his distributive share had not been attached, and where the indebtedness of the heir to the estate is in excess of his share, he has no interest in the estate which can be reached by his creditors.”

> ******

In this connection, see: Haley v. Partain, 31 Ga.App. 144, 120 S.E. 14; Wilson v. Channell, 102 Kan. 793, 175 P. 95; Gosnell v. Flack, 76 Md. 423, 25 A. 411; Hull v. Vaughn, 23 Tenn.App. 448, 134 S.W.2d *206.*

Therefore, the orders here under review be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
# National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, 2009

 As a Nation, we have made significant progress in the fight against prostate cancer. Over the last decade, prostate cancer mortality rates have fallen substantially. Yet, despite this progress, among men in the United States prostate cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. One in six men in this country will be diagnosed with prostate cancer. National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month is an opportunity to renew our commitment to find better ways to prevent, detect, and control this disease.

 Prostate cancer affects both those stricken with the disease and their families, often occurring when they least expect it. The cancer does not discriminate among husbands, fathers, brothers, and sons, and it does not differentiate on race, age, or income. Americans of every background know its dangers. Families share in the struggles of prostate cancer, bearing the emotional and financial concerns along with the afflicted.

 My Administration supports prevention efforts and research to develop better screening tests, uncover more effective treatments, and ensure quality care for all who are diagnosed with this illness. We must ensure that more men are educated about all aspects of the disease including prevention, early detection and possible treatment options. To expand our knowledge of this cancer, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are playing leading roles in research. Their work is helping to reduce the burden of prostate cancer and save lives for generations to come.

 This month, we remember the lives we have lost, and we recommit ourselves to supporting those currently battling against the disease. National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month also highlights the great medical advancements we have made and reminds us there is still much work to be done. As a Nation, we are united in our resolve to reduce incidence of prostate cancer and improve the lives of all those affected.

 NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2009 as National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month. I encourage citizens, Government agencies, private businesses, nonprofit organizations, and other interested groups to join in activities that will increase awareness of what Americans can do to prevent and control prostate cancer.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-21502

Billing code 3195-W9-P
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.60 Payment for the services of CRNAs. ( a ) *Basis for payment.* The allowance for the anesthesia service furnished by a CRNA, medically directed or not medically directed, is based on allowable base and time units as defined in § 414.46(a). Beginning with CY 1994— ( 1 ) The allowance for an anesthesia service furnished by a medically directed CRNA is based on a fixed percentage of the allowance recognized for the anesthesia service personally performed by the physician alone, as specified in § 414.46(d)(3); and
( 2 ) The CF for an anesthesia service furnished by a CRNA not directed by a physician may not exceed the CF for a service personally performed by a physician.
( b ) *To whom payment may be made.* Payment for an anesthesia service furnished by a CRNA may be made to the CRNA or to any individual or entity (such as a hospital, critical access hospital, physician, group practice, or ambulatory surgical center) with which the CRNA has an employment or contract relationship that provides for payment to be made to the individual or entity.
( c ) *Condition for payment.* Payment for the services of a CRNA may be made only on an assignment related basis, and any assignment accepted by a CRNA is binding on any other person presenting a claim or request for payment for the service.
[60 FR 63178, Dec. 8, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997; 64 FR 59441, Nov. 2, 1999; 77 FR 69363, Nov. 16, 2012]
### The Square Buttes coal field, Oliver and Mercer Counties, North Dakota

By: William D. Johnson Jr.Robert Paul Kunkel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1076

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (172 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MERISEL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIERTY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000724941
<NAME>                                       MERISEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                              36,448
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      229,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                        14,971
<INVENTORY>                                        193,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   453,360
<PP&E>                                             156,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                      81,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     533,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              366,161
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              2
<COMMON>                                               803
<OTHER-SE>                                          78,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       533,007
<SALES>                                              2,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,092
<CGS>                                                1,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      128,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (51,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           313
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (30,345)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.38)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 410

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

#### § 410.24 Limitations on services of a doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine.

Medicare Part B pays for services furnished by a doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine within the scope of his or her license, if the services would be covered as physicians' services when performed by a doctor of medicine or osteopathy.[1]

[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 8852, Mar. 1, 1991]

###### Footnotes -
  410.24

[1] For services furnished before July 1, 1981, Medicare Part B paid only for the following services of a doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine;

Surgery on the jaw or any adjoining structure; and

Reduction of a fracture of the jaw or other facial bone.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Facilitators of Hizballah Financial Advisor

# 									Designating Facilitators of Hizballah Financial Advisor							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

May 2, 2024

The United States is today designating five individuals and two entities in connection with sanctions evasion by U.S.-designated Hizballah financial advisor Hassan Moukalled. These efforts have enabled Moukalled to continue to support the terrorist group and its leadership.

The United States remains committed to deterring and disrupting terrorist financing and identifying its enablers. Today’s action is another reminder that there are consequences for enablers of terrorist groups who facilitate sanctions evasion through businesses posing as legitimate investments.

*Treasury designations were taken pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended, which targets terrorist groups and their supporters. For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top
#### THE UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.

[52 C. Cls., 226 ; 249 U. S., 354.]

Judgment was delivered in favor of the plaintiff company in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

The term “ troops of the United States,” as used in land grant acts and in the agreement of the Union Pacific Company, in relation to transportation for the Government, held not to embrace any of the following classes of persons when traveling separately and not as part of a moving body or detachment of soldiers, viz: Discharged soldiers, discharged military *192prisoners, and rejected applicants for enlistment; applicants for enlistment, previously accepted, but subject to final examination and not sworn in; retired enlisted men; and ful-lougbed soldiers *en route*back to tbeir stations.

Mr. Jttstioe BraNdeis

delivered the opinion of the Court March 31, 1919.
40788.

#### NAGEL v. NEDOBA et al.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs in error except to the judgment of the trial court dismissing their motion for new trial and to the subsequent ruling dismissing their motion to reinstate their motion for new trial.

The motion for new trial was on the general grounds only but no brief of evidence accompanied the motion. *Held:*

It is always essential in passing upon what are commonly called the “general grounds” of a motion for new trial that the court consider the evidence. Thus, a motion for new trial must be dismissed where it is based on the general grounds only and is unsupported by a brief of evidence. *Hart v. Brooks,*103 Ga. App. 470 (1) (119 SE2d 602); *Murry v. Snyder,*91 Ga. App. 456 (2b) (85 SE2d 823); *McKoy v. Hardy,*92 Ga. App. 525, 527 (88 SE2d 708); *Daniel v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.,*89 Ga. App. 895, 899 (2) (81 SE2d 547); *Oliver v. Benson,*211 Ga. 268 (2, 3) (85 SE2d 418); Ga. Procedure and Practice, § 22-7.

The above rule is applicable even if the petition initiating the trial clearly shows on its face that it was subject to general demurrer. The rule is also relevant even if it is apparent that the verdict was not authorized by the pleadings. Under the rule enunciated in *Harvey v. DeWeill,*102 Ga. App. 394 (2b), 404-407 (116 SE2d 747), it is quite possible that all of the deficiencies in the petition may have been supplied during *148the trial by the admission of evidence which, while not authorized by the pleadings, was admitted without objection.

Decided July 14, 1964

Rehearing denied July 27, 1964.

*Wade H. Leonard,*for plaintiff in error.

*Shaw, Stolz & Fletcher, George P. Shaw,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT NO. 11.1



STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                          |  |                              |  |                   
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2004
|                                          |  | Shares                       |  | Earnings Per Share
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 7,159,873                    |  | 1.17              
|Diluted                                   |  | 7,159,873                    |  | 1.17              
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 7,159,873                    |  | 1.17              
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  | 7,159,873                    |  | 1.17              
|                                          | 
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2003
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 7,160,992                    |  | 1.08              
|Diluted                                   |  | 7,160,992                    |  | 1.08              
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 7,160,992                    |  | 1.08              
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  | 7,160,992                    |  | 1.08
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0478

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSIAH BRACKETT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 23 2023

01/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0478
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.54 Payment for certified nurse-midwives' services. ( a ) For services furnished after December 31, 1991, allowed amounts under the fee schedule established under section 1833(a)(1)(K) of the Act for the payment of certified nurse-midwife services may not exceed 65 percent of the physician fee schedule amount for the service.
( b ) For certified nurse-midwife services furnished on or after January 1, 2011, allowed amounts may not exceed 100 percent of the physician fee schedule amount that would be paid to a physician for the services.
[75 FR 73616, Nov. 29, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet, consolidated statement of operations, and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                        
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                              11,034
<SECURITIES>                                        71,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    22,566
<PP&E>                                              70,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                      37,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     129,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               22,185
<BONDS>                                             33,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                38
<OTHER-SE>                                          73,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       129,499
<SALES>                                             20,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    57,477
<CGS>                                               11,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       60,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.16 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.15
        


</TABLE>
# C_2005288EN.01000101.xml

| 19.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 November 2005

(2005/C 288/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1679 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5675 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5468 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 72,48 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8820 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5734 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,347 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9734 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6452 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,684 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6033 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5966 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3892 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0554 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7028 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9872 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 210,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8526 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4404 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 789,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,415 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,721 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,7180 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,129 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1679

JPY

Japanese yen

139,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5675

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5468

ISK

Iceland króna

72,48

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8820

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5734

CZK

Czech koruna

29,347

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9734

RON

Romanian leu

3,6452

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,684

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6033

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5966

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3892

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0554

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7028

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9872

KRW

South Korean won

1 210,29

ZAR

South African rand

7,8526

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4404

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 789,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,415

PHP

Philippine peso

63,721

RUB

Russian rouble

33,7180

THB

Thai baht

48,129

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---