alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 303 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 303

To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired members of the 
    Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive 
compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with 
              retired pay, without deduction from either.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Bilirakis (for himself and Mr. Tejeda) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired members of the 
    Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive 
compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with 
              retired pay, without deduction from either.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5304(a)(1) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following: ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, 
emergency officers', regular, or reserve retirement pay may be paid to 
any veteran concurrently with compensation for any service-connected 
disability, without deduction from either the retirement pay or the 
compensation; however, nothing in this sentence shall permit payment of 
retirement pay and of compensation based upon the same disability.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006036EN.01001502.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 December 2005

in Case C-445/04: Possehl Erzkontor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Subheading 2519 90 10 - Fused magnesia obtained by fusion in an electric arc furnace of magnesite that has previously been caustic-burned - Fused magnesia)

(2006/C 36/29)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-445/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht (Finance Court) Düsseldorf (Germany), made by decision of 13 October 2004, received at the Court on 21 October 2004, in the proceedings Possehl Erzkontor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 December 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Possehl Erzkontor GmbH

Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Fused magnesia such as that at issue in the main proceedings comes under subheading 2519 90 10 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulations (EC) Nos 3115/94 of 20 December 1994, 1359/95 of 13 June 1995, 2448/95 of 10 October 1995 and 3009/95 of 22 December 1995.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18. 12. 2004.

1

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles A. HEALY v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 80-KH-1583.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Charles A. Healy, applying for writs of certiorari, habeas corpus and mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 243-565.

Denied.
#### Phillip E. HAWLEY and Linda D. Hawley, Appellants, v. Charles P. WEAVER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-864.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 30, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting Principal Financial Officer

April 7, 2011             

 

 

----
No. 16,883.

#### The Evansville and Indianapolis Railroad Company *v.*West, Treasurer et al.

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

*J. E. Iglehart*and *E. Taylor,*for appellant.

*A. G. Smith,*Attorney-General, *J. T. Beasley, A. B. Williams, W. D. Bobinson, W. Hickam, W. W. Ireland*and *S. B. Hamill,*for appellees.

Hackney, C. J.

This suit was by the appellant against the appellees James A. West, treasurer of Gibson county; James F. Saunders, treasurer of Yanderbúrg county; J. F. Masters, treasurer of Warrick county; O. O. Smith, treasurer of Pike county; R. J. Barr, treasurer of Daviess county; John French, treasurer of Greene county; W. F. Cassady, treasurer of Owen county; Ernest Muehler, treasurer of Clay county; Gus A. Conzman, treasurer of Vigo county; T. G. Murder-town, treasurer of the city of Washington,'Daviess county; W. W. Hauck, treasurer of the city of Terre Haute, Vigo county, and John McDonough, treasurer of the city of Evansville.

The lower court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and no other ruling is assigned as error.

The questions presented by the record are the same as those decided in the cases of *Cleveland, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 513; *Indianapolis, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 609; *Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 625; and confirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States on the-day of May, 1894.

*698Filed June 20, 1894.

Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, and the restraining order, heretofore issued herein by this court, is dissolved.
# Seychelles

53 items

        -    Report  		Seychelles	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Seychelles	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Seychelles (16-107) – Air Transport Agreement	  January 7, 2016 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF HUBCO, INC.:

Hudson United Bank, organized under the banking laws of the State of New Jersey.
Lafayette American Bank and Trust, organized under the banking laws of the State
  of Connecticut.
Bank of the Hudson, organized under the banking laws of the State of New York.
MSB Travel, Inc., organized under the New York Business Laws.

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF HUDSON UNITED BANK:

Hendrick Hudson Corp. of New Jersey, organized under the New Jersey Business
  Corporation Act.
Lafayette Development Corp., organized under the New Jersey Business
  Corporation Act.
HUB Investment Services, Inc., organized under the New Jersey Business
  Corporation Act.
HUB Mortgage Investments, Inc., organized under the New Jersey Business
  Corporation Act.
NJ Investments of Delaware, Inc., organized under Delaware Business Laws.
JNB Holdings,Inc., organized under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act.
NYLF, Inc., organized under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act.

               SUBSIDIARIES OF LAFAYETTE AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST:

AMBA Realty Corporation, organized under the Connecticut Business Laws.
LAI Company, organized under the Connecticut Business Laws.
LAB Investment Corp. of Delaware, Inc., organized under Delaware Business Laws.
AMBA II Realty Corp., organized under the Connecticut Business Laws.

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE BANK OF THE HUDSON:

POSABK, Inc., organized under the New York Business Laws.
Plural Realty, Inc., organized under the New York Business Laws.
PSB Building Corp., organized under the New York Business Laws.
Hudson Trader Brokerage Services Inc., organized under the New York Business
  Laws.
BOTH Investments of Delaware, Inc., organized under Delaware Business Laws.
Markgard Realty, Inc., organized under New York Business Laws.
Fair Street Associates, organized under New York Business Laws.
Plural Realty of Chappaqua, Inc., organized under New York Business Laws.
PSB Associates, Inc., organized under New York Business Laws.
Twin Plaza Realty, Inc., organized under Florida Business Laws.
Marmet Apartments of West Virginia, Inc., organized under
  West Virginia Business Laws.
Riverdale Timber Ridge, Inc., organized under the New Jersey Business
  Corporation Act.
# C_2005229EN.01002401.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/24

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 July 2005

in Case T-117/05 R: Andreas Rodenbröker v Commission of the European Communities

(Application for interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Directive 92/43/EEC - Urgency - None)

(2005/C 229/52)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-117/05 R: Andreas Rodenbröker, residing in Hövelhof (Germany), and the 81 other applicants whose names are set out in an annex to the order, represented by H. Glatzel, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. van Beek and B. Schima, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for suspension of further implementation of Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1) — the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 5 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved

---
# C_2006014EN.01000101.xml

| 19.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 January 2006

(2006/C 14/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2125 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3297 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5468 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,61 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,862 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8552 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6480 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,48 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,620 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6210 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6181 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4122 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4018 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7620 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9749 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 202,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3553 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7854 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3815 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 522,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,555 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,838 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2820 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,869 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2125

JPY

Japanese yen

139,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68640

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3297

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5468

ISK

Iceland króna

74,61

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

28,862

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8552

RON

Romanian leu

3,6480

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,48

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,620

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6210

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6181

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4122

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4018

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7620

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9749

KRW

South Korean won

1 202,98

ZAR

South African rand

7,3553

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7854

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3815

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 522,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,555

PHP

Philippine peso

63,838

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2820

THB

Thai baht

47,869

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 584.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a); or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) *Example.* A license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a), also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a).
§ 37.40 General provisions. ( a ) The chest radiographic examination must be given at a convenient time and place.
( b ) The chest radiographic examination consists of the chest radiograph, a completed Chest Radiograph Classification Form (CDC/NIOSH 2.8), and a completed Miner Identification Document (CDC/NIOSH 2.9).
( c ) A radiographic examination must be made in a facility approved in accordance with § 37.43 or § 37.44. Chest radiographs of miners under this section must be performed: ( 1 ) By or under the supervision of a physician who makes chest radiographs in the normal course of practice and who has demonstrated ability to make chest radiographs of a quality to best ascertain the presence of pneumoconiosis; or
( 2 ) By a radiologic technologist as defined in § 37.2.
[81 FR 73282, Oct. 24, 2016]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Manfred F. Dyck, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Hydromer, Inc.


Date: September 10, 2004                   By: /s/ Manfred F. Dyck
                                              --------------------
                                           Manfred F. Dyck
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       17
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.416 Organ acquisition charges for kidney-paired exchanges. ( a ) Initial living donor evaluations. When a recipient and donor elect to participate in a kidney paired exchange, the costs of the initial living donor evaluations are incurred by the originally intended recipient's TH, regardless of whether the living donor actually donates to their originally intended recipient, a kidney paired exchange recipient, or does not donate at all.
( b ) *Additional tests after a match.* In a kidney paired exchange, regardless of whether an actual donation occurs, once the donor and recipient are matched, any additional tests requested by the recipient's TH and performed by the donor's TH, are billed to the recipient's TH as charges reduced to cost (using the donor's TH's cost to charge ratio) and included as acquisition costs on the recipient TH's Medicare cost report.
( c ) *Procurement and transport of a kidney.* When a donor's TH procures and furnishes a kidney to a recipient's TH all of the following are applicable: ( 1 ) All costs must be reasonable and necessary.
( 2 ) ( i ) The donor's TH bills the recipient's TH.
( ii ) The donor's TH bills its charges reduced to cost, or bills its applicable kidney SAC for the reasonable costs associated with procuring, packaging, and transporting the kidney.
( 3 ) The donor's TH records the costs described in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section on its Medicare cost report as kidney acquisition costs and offsets any payments received from the recipient's TH against its kidney acquisition costs.
( 4 ) The recipient's TH records as part of its kidney acquisition costs - ( i ) The amounts billed by the donor's TH for the reasonable costs associated with procuring, packaging, and transporting the organ; and
( ii ) Any additional testing performed and billed by the donor's TH.
( d ) Donor's procurement occurs at recipient TH. In a kidney-paired exchange— ( 1 ) When a donor's TH does not procure a kidney, but the donor travels to the recipient's TH for the organ procurement, the reasonable costs associated with the organ procurement are included on the Medicare cost report of the recipient's TH; and
( 2 ) The travel expenses of the living donor are not allowable Medicare costs.
[86 FR 73515, Dec. 27, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 72290, Nov. 23, 2022]
#### Ex Parte James K. STEWART. (Re James K. Stewart v. Kimberly Y. Stewart).

80-238.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1981.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Writ denied. No opinion.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES, EMBRY, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

ALMON, J., dissents.
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Data Driven Public Diplomacy: Progress Towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities (2014)

# 									Data Driven Public Diplomacy: Progress Towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities (2014)							

ACPD Special Report

September 16, 2014

Data-Driven Public Diplomacy: Progress Towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities
Download Report						 [2 MB]

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top
# C_2005296EN.01002002.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2005 — Sumitomo Chemical and Sumika Fine Chemicals v Commission

(Joined Cases T-22/02 and T-23/02) (1)

1

(Competition - Cartels in the vitamin sector - Commission Decision finding infringements that have ceased and not imposing fines - Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74 - Time-limit on the power of the Commission to impose fines or penalties - Principle of legal certainty - Presumption of innocence - Legitimate interest in finding that infringements have been committed)

(2005/C 296/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) and Sumika Fine Chemicals Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan)) (represented by M. Klusmann, lawyer, and V. Turner, Solicitor)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by L. Pignataro-Nolin and A. Whelan, agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of Commission Decision 2003/2/EC of 21 November 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.512 — Vitamins) (OJ 2003 L 6, p. 1) in so far as it concerns the applicants

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls Commission Decision 2003/2/EC of 21 November 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.512 — Vitamins) in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls Commission Decision 2003/2/EC of 21 November 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.512 — Vitamins) in so far as it concerns the applicants;

| 2) | Orders the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the defendant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...COVID-19 Global Action Plan Ministerial

# 									COVID-19 Global Action Plan Ministerial							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 14, 2022

As the world continues to grapple with COVID-19’s far-reaching impacts and the emergence of new variants, there remains an urgent need for political and diplomatic engagement and coordination to accelerate progress to end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and strengthen health security.  Accordingly, the United States and Japan will jointly host a virtual COVID-19 Ministerial on July 19 to further galvanize international action, measure progress, and outline necessary steps to control COVID-19 and strengthen global health security.

The participating government officials and international organization representatives will meet to maintain progress and drive action on the six lines of effort in the COVID-19 Pandemic Prioritized Global Action Plan for Enhanced Engagement (“GAP”), which we launched earlier this year: (1) Getting Shots in Arms; (2) Bolstering Supply Chain Resilience; (3) Addressing Information Gaps; (4) Supporting Health Care Workers; (5) Ensuring Acute Non-Vaccine Interventions (Test and Treat); and (6) Strengthening the Global Health Security Architecture.

Health security is national security, and all governments and stakeholders must play a central role in bringing the acute phase of this pandemic to an end.  No one country acting alone can stop the virus, and the United States will continue to coordinate closely with our global partners to emerge stronger from this pandemic and build a more resilient global health infrastructure. Next week’s Ministerial will constitute another important step on that path.

Tags

COVID-19Global HealthGlobal HealthHealth InformationOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top