alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3128 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3128

 To make it unlawful to send lobbying communications to Congress which 
                            are fraudulent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 1996

  Mr. Flanagan (for himself and Mr. Dingell) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make it unlawful to send lobbying communications to Congress which 
                            are fraudulent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRAUDULENT LOBBYING COMMUNICATIONS.

    (a) Provision.--Whoever--
            (1) with the intent to influence action by a House of 
        Congress or any Member of Congress on any nomination or 
        legislation;
            (2) engages in any conduct whereby a purported 
        communication of the opinion of an identified individual 
        respecting such action is made to a Member of Congress in any 
        telegram, letter, or electronic communication; and
            (3) knows that such individual did not in fact authorize 
        such communication;
shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000. For purposes 
of this section, the term ``nomination or legislation'' means any 
nomination pending before the Senate or any legislation being 
considered by either House of Congress or a committee of either House 
of Congress.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect 30 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.43

  

  
    
      

      

    

    SECOND LEASE AMENDMENT

     

    This Lease Amendment made this 17th day of November, 2020 by and between DUKE & DUKE, a Limited Partnership, of 37000 Grand River Avenue, Suite 360, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, as "LANDLORD" and Ocuphire Pharma, Inc.
      of 37000 Grand River Avenue, Suite 120, Farmington Hills, Ml 48335, as "TENANT'.

     

    WITNESSETH

     

    WHEREAS, on or about the 19th day of May, 2019, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement with a First Amendment on October 29, 2019. The Lease together with any and all Amendments and/or riders is herein
      collectively referred to as, "Lease". The certain demised premises consists of 1,623 rentable square feet and being commonly known as Suite 120 at 37000 Grand River Avenue, Farmington Hills, MI 48335; and

     

    WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend this Lease in respect to the demised premises in that Tenant will extend the term of the original Lease Agreement; and

     

    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of monies to be paid and covenants and conditions to be performed, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     

    1.           That the rent for the Suite known as Suite 120 will be as follows;

     

    01/01/2021 — 12/31/2021          $22.00 per rentable square foot

     

    2.           That the expiration date of Tenant's Lease shall be December 31, 2021.

     

    3.           Tenant Share: 2.13%

     

    4.           Base Tax:          $1.39

     

    5.           Miscellaneous: The Lease remains in full force and effect and has not been modified or extended except as specifically set in this Second Amendment and extension of lease agreement. To the extent of any
      conflict between this Amendment and extension of lease agreement and the lease, the provisions of this Second Amendment shall control.

     

    	
            TENANT:

          	 	
            LANDLORD:

          
	  	 	 
	
            Ocuphire Pharma, Inc.

          	 	
            DUKE & DUKE,

            a Limited Partnership

          
	  	 	 
	By:

          	
            /s/ Mina Sooch

          	 	
            By:

          	
            /s/ Rachel Pharis

          	 
	 	

          	

          	

          	
            

            

          
	Name:	
            Mina Sooch

          	 	Name:	Rachel Pharis
	 	 	 	 	 
	Its:	CEO	 	Its:	As authorized agent for Duke & Duke LP
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	11/17/20	 	Date:	11/17/2020
# C_2006048EN.01000601.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 10 January 2006

in Case C-222/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione in Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato, Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (1)

1

(State aid - Articles 87 EC and 88 EC - Banks - Banking foundations - Meaning of ‘undertaking’ - Relief from direct tax on dividends received by banking foundations - Categorisation as State aid - Compatibility with the common market - Commission Decision 2003/146/EC - Determination of validity - Inadmissibility - Articles 12 EC, 43 EC and 56 EC - Principle of non-discrimination - Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital)

(2006/C 48/11)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-222/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy), made by decision of 23 March 2004, received at the Court on 28 May 2004, in the proceedings between Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato, Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, R. Silva de Lapuerta and G. Arestis, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 January 2006, in which it ruled:

| 1. | A legal person such as that in question in the main proceedings can, after an examination which it is for the national court to conduct, on account of the regime applicable to the period concerned, be treated as an ‘undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC, and, as such, subject at that period to the Community rules relating to State aid. |
| --- | --- |

1.

A legal person such as that in question in the main proceedings can, after an examination which it is for the national court to conduct, on account of the regime applicable to the period concerned, be treated as an ‘undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC, and, as such, subject at that period to the Community rules relating to State aid.

| 2. | An exemption from retention on dividends such as that in question in the main proceedings can, after an examination which it is for the national court to conduct, be categorised as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC. |
| --- | --- |

2.

An exemption from retention on dividends such as that in question in the main proceedings can, after an examination which it is for the national court to conduct, be categorised as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC.

---

(1)  OJ C 190 of 24.07.2004.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 411

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

#### § 411.21 Definitions.

In this subpart B and in subparts C through H of this part, unless the context indicates otherwise—

*Conditional payment* means a Medicare payment for services for which another payer is responsible, made either on the bases set forth in subparts C through H of this part, or because the intermediary or carrier did not know that the other coverage existed.

*Coverage* or *covered services,* when used in connection with primary payments, means services for which a primary payer would pay if a proper claim were filed.

*Monthly capitation payment* means a comprehensive monthly payment that covers all physician services associated with the continuing medical management of a maintenance dialysis patient who dialyses at home or as an outpatient in an approved ESRD facility.

*Plan* means any arrangement, oral or written, by one or more entities, to provide health benefits or medical care or assume legal liability for injury or illness.

*Primary payer* means, when used in the context in which Medicare is the secondary payer, any entity that is or was required or responsible to make payment with respect to an item or service (or any portion thereof) under a primary plan. These entities include, but are not limited to, insurers or self-insurers, third party administrators, and all employers that sponsor or contribute to group health plans or large group health plans.

*Primary payment* means, when used in the context in which Medicare is the secondary payer, payment by a primary payer for services that are also covered under Medicare.

*Primary plan* means, when used in the context in which Medicare is the secondary payer, a group health plan or large group health plan, a workers' compensation law or plan, an automobile or liability insurance policy or plan (including a self-insured plan), or no-fault insurance.

*Prompt* or *promptly,* when used in connection with primary payments, except as provided in § 411.50, for payments by liability insurers, means payment within 120 days after receipt of the claim.

*Proper claim* means a claim that is filed timely and meets all other claim filing requirements specified by the plan, program, or insurer.

*Secondary,* when used to characterize Medicare benefits, means that those benefits are payable only to the extent that payment has not been made and cannot reasonably be expected to be made under other coverage that is primary to Medicare.

*Secondary payments* means payments made for Medicare covered services or portions of services that are not payable under other coverage that is primary to Medicare.

[54 FR 41734, Oct. 11, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 45361, Aug. 31, 1995; 71 FR 9470, Feb. 24, 2006]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONSI, Robert R. Jones, III, interim principal financial officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 30, 2006     /s/ Robert R. Jones, III   Robert R. Jones, III  Interim principal financial officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kendle L. FULLER.

No. 64558.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1979.

In re Kendle L. Fuller applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Avoyelles. No. 40,972.

Writ denied. Applicant has an adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive Officer
of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership (the General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer of the General Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITT President and Chief Executive Officer November 12, 2004/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLER Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer November 12, 2004
# C_2006048EN.01002702.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2005 — Cwik v Commission

(Joined Cases T-155/03, T-157/03 and T-331/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Staff report - Promotion exercises 1995/1997, 1997/1999 and 1999/2001 - Actions for annulment - Drawing-up successive staff reports at the same time - Procedural irregularities - Lateness - Personal file - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Inconsistency of the statement of reasons - Compensation for damage suffered - Material damage - Non-material damage)

(2006/C 48/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Michael Cwik (Tervuren, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and E. de Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Application for

Firstly, annulment of the Commission decisions drawing-up the definitive version of the applicant's staff reports for the periods running from 1 July 1995 to 30 June 1997, from 1 July 1997 to 30 June 1999 and from 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2001 and, so far as necessary, the Commission decisions rejecting the applicant's complaints as to those reports, and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage alleged.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission decisions drawing-up the definitive version of the applicant's staff reports for the periods 1995/1997 and 1997/1999 and the Commission decisions rejecting the applicant's complaints as to those staff reports; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission decisions drawing-up the definitive version of the applicant's staff reports for the periods 1995/1997 and 1997/1999 and the Commission decisions rejecting the applicant's complaints as to those staff reports;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 2 000 by way of damages; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 2 000 by way of damages;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the actions; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the actions;

| 4. | In Cases T-155/03 and T-157/03, orders the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

In Cases T-155/03 and T-157/03, orders the Commission to pay the costs;

| 5. | In Case T-331/03, orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

In Case T-331/03, orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half the applicant's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 19.7.2003.

1

---
§ 585.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 585.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 585.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 585.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 585.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
# C_2005148EN.01000301.xml

| 18.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 June 2005

(2005/C 148/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2177 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4452 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66780 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2403 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5441 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,31 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8630 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,883 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0536 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 153 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,43 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6591 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5670 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5077 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4665 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6991 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0351 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1270 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0783 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3100 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 714,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6283 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,552 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,058 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2177

JPY

Japanese yen

132,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4452

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66780

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2403

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5441

ISK

Iceland króna

79,31

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8630

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

29,883

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0536

ROL

Romanian leu

36 153

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,43

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,315

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6591

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5670

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5077

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4665

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6991

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0351

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,02

ZAR

South African rand

8,1270

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0783

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3100

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 714,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6283

PHP

Philippine peso

67,552

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7400

THB

Thai baht

50,058

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---