alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WORLD JET-AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. ALLRED INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Colorado Corporation, Appellee.

No. 80-1570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 6, 1981.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1981.

Warner B. Miller and Ronald P. Gossett of Hodges, Gossett & McDonald, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Richard Katz of William J. Goldworn & Associates, Coral Gables, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Allred International sued World Jet-Aircraft Industries, Inc., and two other defendants (1) to recover a security deposit and (2) for damages resulting from fraud and deceit. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Allred and against World Jet-Aircraft on Count I of the complaint and a partial summary judgment on liability against World Jet on Count II. From those summary judgments World Jet has perfected this appeal.

We find no error demonstrated in the summary judgment on Count I. Allred furnished a refundable security deposit of $50,000 pending its inspection and determination to buy a 727 jet aircraft. If Allred *1193bought the 727 the refundable deposit was to be carried over and applied to a Bachman 111 aircraft. Allred bought neither aircraft, but World Jet refused to return the deposit. Like the trial court, we hold the contract is unambiguous and there is no genuine issue of material fact involved; Allred is entitled to a return of the deposit.

On the other hand, Count II alleges World Jet represented that: it would hold, subject to inspection, the 727 aircraft upon receipt of a $50,000 refundable security deposit; the 727 would be removed from the market for thirty days; World Jet agreed it would authorize a transfer of the refundable security deposit to a Bachman 111 aircraft; all of those representations were false at the time they were made and World Jet knew they were false when made; they were made with intent to deceive Allred and induce it to enter into 'the contract; and Allred relied on the representation to its detriment. While the parties are not in agreement as to the actual fraudulent acts charged, it appears to us that whatever they may be, the facts are still in controversy and that Count II is not ripe for summary determination.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed as to Count I and reversed as to Count II.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, and remanded.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
# C_2006036EN.01001302.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-254/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/20/EC - Electronic communications networks and services - Authorisation - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 36/24)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-254/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Zavvos and M. Shotter) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 14 June 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and P. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 07.08.2004

1

---
# C_2006020EN.01003001.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/30

---

New national side of euro circulation coins

(2006/C 20/10)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2 EUR denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration: 25th birthday of the heir to the throne, The Grand-Duke Guillaume

Factual description of the design: The coin depicts on the left-hand side of the inner part the effigy of His Royal Highness, The Grand-Duke Henri looking to the right, superimposed on the effigy of the hereditary Grand-Duke Guillaume, on the right-hand side of the inner part. The date 2006 appears below both effigies, flanked by the letter ‘S’ and the logo of the Mint. The word ‘LËTZEBUERG’ appears above the effigies along the upper edge of the inner part of the coin. The 12 stars surround the design on the outer ring of the coin.

Issue volume: 1.1 million coins

Approximate issue period: January 2006

Edge lettering: 2 **, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

2

---
# Eritrea

61 items

        -    Report  		Eritrea	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Eritrea	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Hankins, Dennis B. – Republic of Haiti – June 2023

# 									Hankins, Dennis B. – Republic of Haiti – June 2023							

Certificate of Competency

June 30, 2023

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Haiti

CANDIDATE: Dennis B. Hankins

Dennis B. Hankins, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, currently serves at the Pentagon as the Foreign Policy Advisor to the National Guard Bureau. Mr. Hankins has previously served as Ambassador to the Republic of Mali and to the Republic of Guinea. He has served three times as Deputy Chief of Mission, in Sudan, Mauritania and Mozambique, Principal Officer in Sao Paulo, Brazil and Consul General in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Mr. Hankins’ decades of senior leadership experience under often challenging diplomatic and security environments make him a well-qualified candidate for Ambassador to the Republic of Haiti.

Earlier in his Foreign Service career, Mr. Hankins was Political and Economic Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Portugal, and Political Section chief in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In the early 1990’s, he served in Haiti as the Nonimmigrant Visa Chief and the Refugee Coordinator. Other assignments overseas include Sudan, Thailand and Recife, Brazil. Washington assignments include Deputy Director for Peacekeeping, Senior Watch Officer and Angola desk officer.

Mr. Hankins earned his Bachelor’s degree at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, and his Master’s degree at the National War College. He is the recipient of numerous State Department performance awards. His foreign languages include French, Portuguese and Indonesian.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
694 A.2d 342

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Clarence ROGERS, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 25, 1997.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED. The matter is REMANDED to the Trial Court to allow Petitioner to file a Motion for New Trial Nunc Pro Tunc challenging, the weight of the evidence pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 1410(b)(l)(a)(iv). *See Commonwealth v. Widmer,*547 Pa. 137, 689 A.2d 211 (1997).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Argentine Foreign Minister Cafiero in Buenos Aires

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Argentine Foreign Minister Cafiero in Buenos Aires							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 14, 2023

The below is attributable to Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel:

Following Argentine President Alberto Fernandez’s March 29 meeting with the President, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Buenos Aires with Foreign Minister Santiago Cafiero and recognized 200 years of diplomatic relations between the nations.  They discussed Argentina’s key role in the region and maintaining our strong bilateral relationship, which includes our shared commitment to uphold strong democratic institutions.  Deputy Sherman lauded Argentina’s work with the United States and regional partners on global food security, efforts to combat the emerging threat of synthetic drugs, and promotion of regional economic prosperity.  She also noted Argentina’s consistent support in multilateral forums for Ukraine and interest in protecting human rights around the globe.

Tags

ArgentinaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary for Management & Resources Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois President Ramkalawan

# 									Deputy Secretary for Management & Resources Verma’s Meeting with Seychellois President Ramkalawan							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 1, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

During a meeting today in Victoria, Deputy Secretary of State for Management & Resources Richard Verma and President Wavel Ramkalawan discussed increasing bilateral cooperation on a number of shared priorities, including maritime security, climate change, and anti-corruption.  Deputy Secretary Verma commended Seychelles’ exemplary commitment to and leadership on ocean conservation and the blue economy.   Ramakalawan welcomed the opening of a U.S. embassy in Seychelles, returning to a full-time diplomatic presence for the first time since 1996.  This decision highlights the importance the United States places on its relationship with Seychelles and commitment to enhancing the already strong ties between the two countries.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsClimate ChangeCorruptionDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesDiplomacyEconomic AffairsMaritime SecurityOceansOffice of the SpokespersonSeychelles

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 (the Partnership) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy
Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. /s/ Beverly A. CummingsChief Financial OfficerMarch 29, 2005
# CA2005310EN.01000101.xml

| 8.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 310/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 310/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
# C_2006060EN.01002701.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/27

---

Appeal brought on 9 January 2006 by Anna Herrero Romeu against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-298/02 Anna Herrero Romeu v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-8/06 P)

(2006/C 60/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 October 2005 in Case T-298/02 Anna Herrero Romeu v Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 January 2006 by Anna Herrero Romeu, represented by R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers.

Anna Herrero Romeu

Commission of the European Communities

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| (1) | Declare this appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declare this appeal admissible;

| (2) | Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annul the judgment of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005;

| (3) | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice and of those before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This appeal is based on a single plea: infringement by the CFI of Community law in paragraphs 23 to 44 of the judgment under appeal. In particular, the appellant takes the view that the CFI incorrectly interpreted the term ‘circumstances arising from work done for another State’ used in the second indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations.

---
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.194 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals under section 1878 of the Act.* ( 1 ) A facility that disputes the amount of its allowable Medicare bad debts reimbursed by CMS under § 413.89(h)(3) may request review by the contractor or the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) in accordance with subpart R to part 405 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A facility must request and obtain a final agency decision prior to seeking judicial review of a dispute regarding the amount of allowable Medicare bad debts.
( b ) *Other appeals.* ( 1 ) A facility that has requested higher payment per treatment in accordance with § 413.180 may request review from the contractor or the PRRB if CMS has denied the request in whole or in part. In such a case, the procedure in subpart R of part 405 of this chapter is followed to the extent that it is applicable.
( 2 ) The PRRB has the authority to review the action taken by CMS on the facility's requests. However, the PRRB's decision is subject to review by the Administrator under § 405.1875 of this chapter.
( 3 ) A facility must request and obtain a final agency decision, in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, prior to seeking judicial review of the denial, in whole or in part, of the exception request.
( c ) *Procedure.* ( 1 ) The facility must request review within 180 days of the date of the decision on which review is sought.
( 2 ) The facility may not submit to the reviewing entity, whether it is the contractor or the PRRB, any additional information or cost data that had not been submitted to CMS at the time CMS evaluated the exception request.
( d ) *Determining amount in controversy.* For purposes of determining PRRB jurisdiction under subpart R of part 405 of this chapter for the appeals described in paragraph (b) of this section— ( 1 ) The amount in controversy per treatment is determined by subtracting the amount of program payment from the amount the facility requested under § 413.180; and
( 2 ) The total amount in controversy is calculated by multiplying the amount in controversy per treatment by the projected number of treatments for the exception request period.
[62 FR 43668, Aug. 15, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 77965, Nov. 4, 2016]
#### John Wesley PERKINS, Petitioner, v. LINDSLEY LUMBER COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 47663.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 10, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 ** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                       490
<INVENTORY>                                      2,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,890
<PP&E>                                         314,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,333
<BONDS>                                         22,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,371
<SALES>                                         70,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,993
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,530)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Fully diluted EPS calculation is anti-dilutive.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 9, 2006
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3193

To recognize the significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove, located in Golden

Gate Park in San Francisco, California, and to direct the Secretary

of the Interior to designate the AIDS Memorial Grove as a national

memorial.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1996

Ms. PELOSI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To recognize the significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove,

located in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, California, and to direct the Secretary of the Interior to designate the AIDS Memorial Grove as a national memorial.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘AIDS Memorial Grove

5 Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3193 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION AND DESIGNATION OF THE AIDS ME2 MORIAL GROVE AS NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

3 (a) RECOGNITION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AIDS

4 MEMORIAL GROVE.—The Congress hereby recognizes the

5 significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove, located in Gold6 en Gate Park in San Francisco, California, as a memo7 rial—

8 (1) dedicated to individuals who have died as a

9 result of acquired immune deficiency syndrome; and

10 (2) in support of individuals who are living with

11 acquired immune deficiency syndrome and their

12 loved ones and caregivers.

13 (b) DESIGNATION AS NATIONAL MEMORIAL.—Not

14 later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this

15 Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall designate the AIDS

16 Memorial Grove as a national memorial.

Æ