alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (293)
<INVENTORY>                                        200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,743
<PP&E>                                           7,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,980
<BONDS>                                            351
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,977
<SALES>                                         14,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,995
<CGS>                                            8,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,321
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Belgian Secretary General of Foreign Affairs Gentzis

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Belgian Secretary General of Foreign Affairs Gentzis									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 31, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt M. Campbell met with Belgian Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Theodora Gentzis today in Brussels. Deputy Secretary Campbell thanked Belgium for its leadership during its EU Council Presidency. The two discussed the importance of closing the financing gap for Ukraine and maintaining solidarity against Russia’s brutal war of aggression, including Belgium’s strong military and humanitarian support for Ukraine. Deputy Secretary Campbell also raised the PRC’s support for Russia’s defense industrial base.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateEuropean UnionOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 99.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey S. Schatz, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.



March 26, 2003                     By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Schatz
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                       Jeffrey S. Schatz, Executive Vice
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
                                          of Allegiant Bancorp Inc.
# C_2005296EN.01001904.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/19

---

Removal from the register of Case C-478/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 296/39)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 24 June 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-478/04 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.

1

---
# C_2006048EN.01001501.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/15

---

Action brought on 29 November 2005 by the Commission against Ireland

(Case C-425/05)

(2006/C 48/28)

Language of the case: English

An action against Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 29.11.2005 by the Commission, represented by Mr. Ulrich Wölker and Mr. Michael Shotter, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to provide the information on methyl bromide referred to in Article 4(2)(iii), the information on halons referred to in Articles 4(4)(iv) and 5(3) and the information on the schedules and results of random checks on the import of controlled substances referred to in Article 20(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(2)(iii), 4(4)(iv), 5(3) and 20(3) of the Regualtion; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to provide the information on methyl bromide referred to in Article 4(2)(iii), the information on halons referred to in Articles 4(4)(iv) and 5(3) and the information on the schedules and results of random checks on the import of controlled substances referred to in Article 20(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(2)(iii), 4(4)(iv), 5(3) and 20(3) of the Regualtion;

1

| 2. | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Articles 4(2)(iii), 4(4)(iv), 5(3) and 20(3) of the Regulation provide for the submission of information to the Commission in relation to the main issues covered by the Regulation. The communication of this information — i.e. annual information concerning methyl bromide and halons, together with information on the schedules and results of random checks on imports of controlled substances — is essential for the achievement of the objectives set by the Regulation and for the implementation of the engagements taken by the European Community according to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the obligations arising from the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, to which the Community is party after Council Decision 88/540/EEC (2).

2

To date Ireland has not communicated to the Commission the requisite information pursuant to the aforementioned articles of the Regulation.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer. OJ L 244, 29.09.2000, p. 1-24.

1

(2)  OJ L 297, 31.10.1998, p. 8

2

---
EXHIBIT 32

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), we,
Henry S. Pennypacker, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director and Mary
Bailey Sellers, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                            Dated: November 29, 2007
    ------------------------
    Henry S. Pennypacker
    Title: Chief Executive Officer

    /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
    -----------------------
    Mary Bailey Sellers
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Czech National Security Advisor Pojar

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Czech National Security Advisor Pojar							

Readout

December 10, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Czech National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister Tomas Pojar today in Prague.  Deputy Secretary Sherman commended the Czech government on its stalwart efforts in support of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and its contributions to enable Ukraine to defend itself.  The Deputy Secretary and the National Security Advisor also discussed bilateral defense cooperation and energy security.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCzech RepublicDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSecurityUkraine

Back to Top
#### Lonnie L. BOYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-822.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 10, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1975.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Harold H. Moore, Asst. Public Defender, and Steven H. Denman, Legal Intern, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed his Notice of Appeal on July 10, 1974 from a judgment and sen-fence filed on June 5, 1974. Since the Notice of Appeal was untimely filed this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. F.A.R. 6.2.

It is, therefore, ordered that this appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

§ 405.1865 Record of administrative proceedings. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Board and, if applicable, the Administrator must maintain a complete record of all proceedings in each appeal.
( 2 ) For proceedings before the Board, the administrative record consists of all evidence, documents and any other tangible materials submitted by the parties to the appeal and by any nonparty (as described in §§ 405.1853(e)(4) and 405.1857(c)(3) of this subpart), along with all Board correspondence, rulings, subpoenas, orders, and decisions.
( 3 ) The term “record” is intended to encompass both the unappended record and any appendix to the record (as described in § 405.1865(b) of this subpart).
( 4 ) The record includes a complete transcription of the proceedings at any oral hearing before the Board.
( 5 ) A copy of any transcription must be made available to any party upon written request.
( b ) Any evidence ruled inadmissible by the Board (as described in § 405.1855 of this subpart) and any other submitted matter that the Board declines to consider (whether as untimely or otherwise) must be, to the extent practicable, clearly identified and segregated in an appendix to the record for purposes of any further review (as described in §§ 405.1875 and 405.1877 of this subpart).
( c ) To the extent applicable, the administrative record also includes all documents (including written submissions) and any other tangible materials submitted to the Administrator by the parties to the appeal or by any nonparty (as described in §§ 405.1853(e)(4) and 405.1857(c)(3) of this subpart), in addition to all correspondence from the Administrator or the Office of the Attorney Advisor, and all rulings, orders, and decisions by the Administrator. The provisions of paragraph (b) of this section also pertain to any proceedings before the Administrator, to the extent the Administrator finds evidence inadmissible or declines to consider a specific matter (whether as untimely or otherwise).
[73 FR 30260, May 23, 2008; 73 FR 49356, Aug. 21, 2008]
HomeSwitzerland

# Switzerland

143 items

        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Switzerland	  January 4, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Deputy Secretary of State, Wendy Sherman	  Wendy R. ShermanOctober 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Participation in  Roundtable on Apprenticeship in Switzerland	  October 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Participation in U.S.-Switzerland Strategic Partnership Dialogue	  October 1, 2021 
        -    		Travel to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan, September 29 – October 8, 2021	   
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s Travel to Switzerland, Italy, and France	  September 28, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Trip to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan 	  September 27, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Swiss Confederation National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Participation in Strategic Stability Dialogue with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov	  July 28, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Switzerland and Liechtenstein	  July 21, 2021 

previous page1…89101112…15next page

Back to Top
HomePalau

# Palau

78 items

        -    Media Note  		USTDA Technical Assistance Grant for Network Modernization in the Republic of Palau	  June 21, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Palau	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Dialogue in Papua New Guinea	  May 22, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Papua New Guinean Prime Minister James Marape at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 22, 2023APEC HausPort Moresby, Papua New Guinea 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken Witnesses the Signing of the U.S.-Palau 2023 Agreement Following the Compact of Free Association Section 432 Review	  May 22, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Palau	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Palau	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States of America and the Republic of Palau Sign Memorandum of Understanding	  January 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Building Economic Inclusion via the Blue Economy Program	  October 7, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with the Republic of the Marshall Islands President Kabua, the Federated States of Micronesia President Panuelo, and Palau President Whipps	  September 30, 2022 

previous page1234…8next page

Back to Top
#### SUNRISE FARMS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. S. A. WRIGHT, Jr., Appellee.

No. NN-243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 31, 1979.

David R. Lewis, Jacksonville, for appellants.

George L. Hudspeth, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

SHIVERS, Judge.

This appeal is from a summary final judgment in favor of appellee on the issues raised in the appellants’ complaint. The issues raised by appellee’s counterclaim are not involved on this appeal.

Appellants filed suit against appellee seeking the cancellation or rescission of a purchase and sale agreement dated July 1, 1974, together with all security instruments thereto and all subsequent agreements of the parties. The prayer for cancellation or rescission was based on fraudulent inducement.

The trial court properly assumed in considering the motion for summary judgment that the appellee fraudulently induced appellants to enter into the July 1,1974 agreement. The appellants discovered the original fraud in July, 1974, but made no effort to rescind the contract with appellee. Instead, in early October, 1974, when appellants were in default under the original agreement, the appellants negotiated with appellee for an extension of time on their obligations and reached a workout agree*458ment with the appellee. During this time, appellants were represented by counsel. Further mutually acceptable modifications were made to the parties’ agreements after October, 1974.

The trial court found that the appellants had waived any right for rescission and cancellation by entering into the modification agreements and were estopped from thereafter claiming a right to rescind and cancel the agreements. The trial court concluded that there was no basis in fact or law to support the appellants’ contention that they were forced or coerced to agree to the modification agreements.

We affirm. The holdings of the trial court in ordering summary judgment are supported by the record. An action to cancel or rescind an agreement based on fraudulent inducement cannot be maintained where the agreement has been modified by the parties after the original fraud has been discovered. See *Hurner v. Mutual Bankers Corp.,*140 Fla. 435, 191 So. 831 (1939) and *Benn v. Key West Propane Gas Corp.,*72 So.2d 910 (Fla.1954). The record does not support appellants’ contention that the modifications were entered into by them under duress. Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied.

MILLS, C. J., and MeCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Chapter 35, Appendix 2 – 35A2


EXHIBIT 10.8 

Field Point Capital Management Company

One Landmark Square, Suite 1905

Stamford, CT 06901 

 

 

March 9, 2021

PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.

One Landmark Square, Suite 1905

Stamford, CT 06901 

 

As Chairman of the Board as well as the principal shareholder of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (“PASSUR Aerospace” or the “Company”), I make the following commitment to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this commitment through March 10, 2022.

 

Liquidity

 

I commit that if the Company at any time is unable to meet its obligations through March 10, 2022, that I will provide the necessary continuing financial support to the Company to ensure the Company’s ability to operate as a going concern through the period ending March 10, 2022. Such continuing support may take the form of additional loans or advances to PASSUR Aerospace in addition to the deferral of principal and/or interest payments due on outstanding loans to PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.

 

These commitments are not conditional and are irrevocable through the period ending March 10, 2022.

 

I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial wherewithal to enter into this irrevocable commitment, make the above commitments to the Company and its shareholders.

 

 

/s/G.S. Beckwith Gilbert        .                               

G.S. Beckwith Gilbert

President
#### Marcia WELCH, individually and on behalf of all others, similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WILDWOOD GOLF CLUB and Board of Directors of Stone Lodge, Inc., individually and in their official capacities, Defendants.

Civ.A. No. 90-1154.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

April 21, 1995.

*438Deborah L. Iwanyshyn, Pittsburgh, PA, Bruce Bagin, Pittsburgh, PA, J.W. Hernandez-Cuebas, Delmar, NY, for plaintiffs.

Laura A. Candris, Pittsburgh, PA, for defendants.

ORDER OF COURT

LEE, District Judge.

AND NOW this 21st day of April, 1995, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Stay Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys Fees, Costs and Expenses” (Document No. 336) is DENIED as the Court believes Plaintiffs’ notice of appeal was filed untimely. Furthermore, the docket for the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reflects that counsel have been informed that there may be a jurisdictional defect in the filing of the appeal.

Moreover, a district court, after entry of a final judgment and filing of a notice of appeal, retains the power to adjudicate collateral matters such as applications for counsel fees. *West v. Keve,*721 F.2d 91 (3d Cir.1983).
HomeDeal Teams

# Deal Teams

## Deal Team Overview

Commercial diplomacy is central to our foreign policy. In order to better assist U.S. companies to secure export and investment opportunities overseas, the Departments of State and Commerce, ​jointly lead the Deal Teams initiative, in collaboration with ​eleven other economic and development focused U.S. government agencies.

​Embassy Deal Teams are working groups of interagency officers and staff at our overseas posts focused on helping U.S. companies do business in their markets. The purpose of the Deal Team Initiative is to support U.S. businesses interested in exporting and investing overseas by identifying opportunities early in the deal cycle and deploying all available U.S. government tools to help U.S. companies successfully compete abroad.

## DC Central Deal Team

The DC Central Deal Team (DCC) is a consultative body of the U.S. economic interagency in Washington, DC.  It was created to mobilize the resources of the U.S. government to help U.S. companies win business abroad and to advance U.S. strategic commercial interests.  The DCC supports and facilitates the work of the Deal Teams at posts, coordinates among the participating U.S. government agencies to help assemble support packages to assist U.S. companies, identifies key economic sectors abroad in which to support involvement by U.S. companies, responds to strategic commercial challenges, and facilitates commercial discussions with allies.

## Deal Teams Amplify Interagency Resources

Deal Teams are a powerful tool because they bring together the collective programs, resources, and expertise of the U.S. government. The U.S. government agencies that will be represented in the Deal Teams include The Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, ​Homeland Security, State, Transportation, and Treasury; the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA), the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), ​and the Small Business Administration (SBA).

## More Information

Frequently Asked QuestionsU.S. Government Infrastructure Tools [6 MB]

## Media

**Social Media:**Follow the conversation on Twitter using #DealTeams.

Back to Top