alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 16, 2004

                                        /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        William C. Niegsch, Jr.; Executive Vice
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer of
                                        Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc.
- COP28
- U.S. Center at COP28
- U.S. Center Schedule
- COP28 Releases
- Exhibits
- Daily Events
- COP28 Logistics FAQ

HomeCOP28...Daily Events at the U.S. Center 

# 									Daily Events at the U.S. Center 							

In addition to the dozens of formal events hosted at the U.S. Center at COP28, the U.S. Center will feature two daily informal and interactive programs Climate Chats and NASA Hyperwall Talks. Check the U.S. Center Schedule for Climate Chat and NASA Hyperwall Talk times.

Climate Chats

nasa hyperwall talks

## Climate Chats 

The U.S. Center is hosting a forum to engage with prominent U.S. climate scientists, negotiators, and other experts. These experts will be available for open discussions in our networking space. All are welcome and no appointments are necessary. Bring your questions and ideas to this great opportunity to speak with some of the leading U.S. experts on climate change. See the U.S. Center Schedule for Climate Chat times and event descriptions.

## NASA Hyperwall Talks

The NASA Hyperwall will be a main attraction at the U.S. Center. NASA scientists, including interagency partners, will provide daily presentations showing how NASA’s global leadership and collaboration in climate science and research helps model and predict ocean health, heat waves, wildfires, hurricanes, floods, and droughts. See the U.S. Center Schedule for NASA Hyperwall Talk event descriptions and times.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate ChangeCOP28Office of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate

Back to Top
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas L. Redding, Chief
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDAVID H. GILLChief Executive OfficerMarch 13, 2007/s/ Thomas L. ReddingTHOMAS L. REDDINGChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 13, 2007


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2006048EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-66/02: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Application for annulment - State aid - Decision 2002/581/EC - Tax advantages granted to banks - Statement of reasons for a decision - Categorisation as State aid - Conditions - Compatibility with the common market - Conditions - Important project of common European interest - Development of certain activities)

(2006/C 48/01)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-66/02, Italian Republic (Agents: initially U. Leanza, and subsequently I. M. Braguglia; Lawyer: M. Fiorilli) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci and R. Lyal) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 21 February 2002 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C. W. A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109 of 04.05.2002.

1

---
#### W. George KENNEDY et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE CULLY REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Respondent.

No. 46036.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 13, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 296 So.2d 551.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
HomeTanzania

# Tanzania

100 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs in Tanzania and Uganda	  March 9, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Tanzania	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Minerals Security Partnership Governments Engage with African Countries and Issue a Statement on Principles for Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards	  February 7, 2023 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Advancing Freedom of Expression in Tanzania	  January 24, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Tanzanian Foreign Minister Stergomena Tax	  December 15, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Zero-Tolerance for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse:  U.S. and India Conduct National Investigation Officer ‘Training of Trainers’ Course 	  November 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Trudeau Travels to South Africa, Tanzania, Liberia, and Belgium	  November 7, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Tanzania	  August 18, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		24th Anniversary of the 1998 Embassy Bombings	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Tanzania	  July 28, 2022 

previous page12345…10next page

Back to Top
# C_2005280EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 November 2005

(2005/C 280/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1697 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4578 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6731 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5888 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5381 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 72,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9555 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5734 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,232 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0278 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6254 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,927 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,596 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5989 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3939 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0715 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7043 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9916 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9361 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4577 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 681,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4206 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,638 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,779 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,114 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1697

JPY

Japanese yen

138,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4578

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6731

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5888

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5381

ISK

Iceland króna

72,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9555

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5734

CZK

Czech koruna

29,232

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0278

RON

Romanian leu

3,6254

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,927

TRY

Turkish lira

1,596

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5989

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3939

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0715

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7043

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9916

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,01

ZAR

South African rand

7,9361

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4577

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 681,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4206

PHP

Philippine peso

63,638

RUB

Russian rouble

33,779

THB

Thai baht

48,114

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<PAGE>   1

                                EXHIBIT 10(y)

 RESOLVED, that a cash bonus pool be established for the Company's four senior
 officers for Fiscal 1996 calculated in the aggregate as follows:

             1% of pre-tax earnings up to $1,032,000;                  
             5% of pre-tax earnings between $1,032,001 and $2,064,000; 
            10% of pre-tax earnings between $2,064,001 and $3,095,000;  
            25% of pre-tax earnings over $3,095,000.                    

 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be allocated and paid 40% to Mr.
 Barnum and 20% to each of Mr. Emerson, Mr. Niegsch, and Ms. Brennan.

 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be paid quarterly based on
 estimates and adjusted for the annual amount at the fiscal year-end;

 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Company's officers attempt through estimates of
 annual earnings to spread the quarterly bonus evenly throughout the four
 quarters; and

 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be capped at a total of $563,750,
 which is 125% of the aggregate base salaries of $451,000.
§ 407.57 Part B-ID benefit enrollment. ( a ) *Deemed enrollment.* An individual whose Part A entitlement ends in accordance with § 406.13(f)(2) of this subchapter on or after January 1, 2023, is deemed to have enrolled into the Part B-ID benefit effective the first day of the month in which the individual first satisfies § 407.55, provided he or she provides the attestation required under § 407.59 prior to the termination of their Part A benefits.
( b ) *Individual enrollment.* An individual whose Part A entitlement ends in accordance with § 406.13(f)(2) of this subchapter, and who meets the requirements of § 407.55 and provides the attestation required under § 407.59, may enroll in the Part B-ID benefit under the following conditions: ( 1 ) If the individual's entitlement ends prior to January 1, 2023, he or she may enroll in the Part B-ID benefit beginning on October 1, 2022.
( 2 ) If individual's entitlement ends on or after January 1, 2023, the individual may enroll at any time after their entitlement ends.
( c ) *Reenrollment.* An individual who had previously enrolled in the Part B-ID benefit, but terminated that benefit, can reenroll at any time, provided the individual meets the requirements of § 407.55 and provides the attestation required under § 407.59.
( d ) *Attestation.* To enroll in the Part B-ID benefit, an individual must submit the required attestation as described in § 407.59.
( e ) *Entitlement date.* The entitlement to the Part B-ID benefit will start as follows: ( 1 ) For enrollments provided under paragraph (a) of this section, entitlement is effective the month Part A benefits are terminated.
( 2 ) For enrollments provided under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Part B-ID benefit is effective the month following the month in which the individual provides the attestation required in § 407.59.
( 3 ) *Exception.* Enrollments submitted October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, are effective January 1, 2023.
§ 417.452 Liability of Medicare enrollees. ( a ) *Deductibles and coinsurance.* ( 1 ) A Medicare enrollee of an HMO or CMP is responsible for applicable Medicare deductible and coinsurance amounts, unless the HMO's or CMP's charges for these amounts are reduced under the additional benefits provision of § 417.442.
( 2 ) The deductible and coinsurance amounts may be paid by or on behalf of the enrollee in the form of a premium, membership fee, charge per unit, or other similar charge.
( 3 ) The sum of the amounts the HMO or CMP charges its Medicare enrollees for Medicare deductibles and coinsurance may not exceed, on the average, the actuarial value of the deductible and coinsurance the Medicare enrollees otherwise would have been liable for had they not enrolled in the HMO or CMP or in another HMO or CMP.
( b ) *Services not covered under Medicare.* Unless the services are provided as additional benefits under § 417.442, a Medicare enrollee of an HMO or CMP is liable for payment for— ( 1 ) All services that are not covered under Medicare Part A or Part B; or
( 2 ) If entitled only to Medicare Part B benefits, all services that are not covered under Medicare Part B.
( c ) *Services for which Medicare is not primary payer.* A Medicare enrollee of an HMO or CMP is liable for payments made to the enrollee for all covered services for which Medicare is not the primary payer as provided in § 417.528.
( d ) *Optional supplemental benefits plan.* ( 1 ) The HMO or CMP may offer its Medicare enrollees a supplemental benefit plan to cover deductible and coinsurance amounts, or services not covered under Medicare, or both.
( 2 ) If a supplemental benefit plan premium includes charges for both noncovered services and the deductible and coinsurance amounts applicable to covered services, the portion of the premium that is for deductibles and coinsurance must be computed separately and must be disclosed to the beneficiary during the enrollment process and before he or she elects coverage options.
( 3 ) The sum of the amounts an HMO or CMP charges its Medicare enrollees for services that are not covered under Part A or Part B may not exceed the ACR for these services.
( e ) *Coverage of Part A services for Part B-only Medicare enrollees.* If an HMO or CMP furnishes coverage of Medicare Part A services to a Medicare enrollee entitled to Part B only, the HMO's or CMP's premium (or other payment method) for these services may not exceed the ACR for these services. In addition, if a risk HMO or CMP furnishes these services and supplemental services, which are the same as the additional benefits furnished Medicare enrollees of the HMO or CMP who are entitled to benefits under both Parts A and B, the HMO's or CMP's combined premium for both these groups of services that the Part B enrollee must pay may not exceed 95 percent of the weighted average AAPCC for Part A services (or the Medicare payment for Part A services, if it is less) for the Medicare enrollee of the HMO or CMP.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38079, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45678, Sept. 1, 1995]
§ 548.305 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201(a)(1), 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 19, 2006;
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 548.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked; and
( 3 ) With respect to transactions prohibited by § 548.202, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice of such prohibition.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property, or notice of a prohibition pursuant to § 548.202, is published in the Federal Register.
No. 00-5941.

#### Berry *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 408.22 Increased premiums for late enrollment and for reenrollment.

For an individual who enrolls after expiration of his or her initial enrollment period or reenrolls after termination of a coverage period, the standard monthly premium determined under § 408.20 is increased by ten percent for each full twelve months in the periods specified in §§ 408.24 and 408.25.
#### Marie M. STEADMAN v. Dero D. STEADMAN and Evie K. Steadman.

No. 13927.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1980.

*1283Boris F. Navratil, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-relator.

Albert J. Lord, Baton Rouge, for defendant-respondent.

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

CHIASSON, Judge.

On August 18, 1980, this Court issued “Alternate Writs of Mandamus, Certiorari and Prohibition,” directing the trial court to maintain the applicant’s declinatory exception of insufficiency of service of process or in the alternative the trial judge and/or respondents show cause why the writ should not be made peremptory. The alternative has been selected by the respondents.

This writ application arises from a custody determination between the respondents, grandparents, and the relator, Marie Stead-man, over two minor children of the marriage between the relator and the respondents’ son. A judgment awarding custody of the children to Marie Steadman was rendered on March 24, 1980. The judgment also awarded visitation rights to the grandparents who had the previous custody of the children following a consensual agreement between their son and Marie.

Two weeks after the judgment, respondents, joined by their son, Alan Steadman, filed a motion for contempt, visitation rights, and change of custody in the same numbered suit. These pleadings were served upon the attorney, Boris Navratil, who represented Marie Steadman in the previous hearing. Mr. Navratil filed the exception which was denied by the trial judge.

Even though the issue of jurisdiction is not before us, we are compelled to determine if jurisdiction exists under the rationale of *Imperial v. Hardy,*302 So.2d 5 (La.1974).

> “Sufficiency of the service of process on the husband’s counsel of record depends on whether the court has jurisdiction over the person of the husband. * * * ”

Respondents contend there is jurisdiction in this case under the concept of continuing jurisdiction. *Imperial,*supra. We find that this case is for custody of children and falls within the holding of *Odom v. Odom,*345 So.2d 1154 (La.1977). *Odom,*supra, did not extend the concept of continuing jurisdiction to change of custody case, unless there are sufficient compelling reasons. We deem that the reasons advanced by counsel for the respondents not to be compelling. Since the children and the custodial parent are not present in this state (or in this country), and the grandparents or their son have not been ordered to pay child support, we find no compelling interest for the trial court to continue to exercise jurisdiction.

Since there is no continuing jurisdiction, service of process on Marie Steadman’s counsel of record is of no legal significance. Such service of process would have been sufficient if the concept of continuing jurisdiction would have applied. *Imperial,*supra.

For these reasons, the writ is made peremptory. All costs are to be borne by the respondents in rule.

WRIT MADE PEREMPTORY.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------


                                VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                    SUBSIDIARIES


1.    VLSI Technology GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.

2.    VLSI Technology Limited, incorporated under the laws of the United
      Kingdom.

3.    VLSI Technology France Holding SARL, incorporated under the laws of 
      France.

4.    VLSI Technology K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan.

5.    VLSI Technology Asia Limited, incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong.

6.    VLSI India, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.

7.    VLSI Technology Italia SRL, incorporated under the laws of Italy.

8.    COMPASS Design Automation, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
      Delaware.

9.    COMPASS Design Automation EURL, incorporated under the laws of France.

10.   COMPASS Design Automation, GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.

11.   COMPASS Design Automation International B.V., incorporated under the
      laws of The Netherlands.

12.   COMPASS Design Automation Italia SRL, incorporated under the laws of
      Italy.

13.   COMPASS Japan K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan.

14.   ComAtlas S.A., incorporated under the laws of France.

15.   VLSI Foreign Sales Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the U.S.
      Virgin Islands.

16.   COMPASS Foreign Sales Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the U.S.
      Virgin Islands.

17.   VLSI Technology France EURL, incorporated under the laws of France.

18.   VLSI Technology Wireless Communication Research EURL, incorporated under
      the laws of France.

19.   Creative System Solutions, GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.

20.   Creative System Solutions, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Canada.

21.   Cooperative Silicon Systems Ltd., incorporated under the laws of
      Switzerland.

22.   VLSI Technology (UK) Holdings Limited, incorporated under the laws of the
      United Kingdom.

23.   VLSITEX, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Texas.