alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Former President of Panama Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal for Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Designation of Former President of Panama Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal for Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

January 25, 2023

I am announcing today the designation of former President of Panama Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal (“Martinelli”) for his involvement in significant corruption. Specifically, Martinelli accepted bribes in exchange for improperly awarding government contracts during his tenure as the president. This section 7031(c) designations renders Martinelli and his immediate family members ineligible for entry into the United States.

Accepting bribes for government contracts undermines the integrity of Panama’s democratic institutions and fuels perceptions of corruption and impunity. Such acts of public corruption diminish confidence in governance and reduce resources available for schools, hospitals, roads, and other government services.

These designations reaffirm the commitment of the United States to combat corruption, which harms the public interest, hampers countries’ economic prosperity, and curtails the ability of governments to respond effectively to the needs of their people. The United States continues to stand with all Panamanians in support of democracy and the rule of law, and will continue to promote accountability for those who abuse public power for personal gain, regardless of their position or political affiliation.

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCorruptionDemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonPanamaRule of LawThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### ELTING CENTER CORPORATION, an Alabama Corporation, Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED TITLE CORP., Appellee.

No. 74-1236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1975.

Creel & Glasgow, Miami, for appellant.

Quinton, Leib & Lummus, Neil Chonin and S. William Fuller, 'Jr., Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFfELD and NATHAN, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of an order by the trial court finding that the court has jurisdiction over its person by virtue of service of process effectuated upon another corporation allegedly engaged in a joint venture with the appellant.

*543The appellee filed an amended complaint against the appellant, Elting Center Corporation, an Alabama corporation, and C & H Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, as joint venturers.

Service of process was carried out only upon an agent of C & H Enterprises, Inc.

Thereafter, the court granted Elting’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction over its person. Upon re-hearing, however, the court reversed itself and ruled that the court had jurisdiction over the appellant because of the service made upon C & H Enterprises, Inc.

The court relied upon the Florida Supreme Court’s holding in Largay Enterprises, Inc. v. Berman, Fla. 1952, 61 So.2d 366, and this court’s decision in Heritage Corp. of So. Fla. v. Apartment Invest., Inc., Fla.App.1973, 285 So.2d 629.

It was the court’s view, and it is the ap-pellee’s position, that a “joint venture” is the same as a “partnership” or a “limited partnership” for purposes of Fla.Stat. §§ 48.061(1) and 620.30, F.S.A. concerning service of process upon partnerships.

However, we note that statutes involving service of process upon non-residents must be accorded a strict construction. Fleischman v. Morris, Fla.App.1972, 260 So.2d 278; Lipman v. Zuk, Fla.App. 1970, 244 So. 496; Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 903.

Moreover, a joint venture is not a legal entity in the same sense of a partnership, even though the distinction is often, blurred. See, 46 Am.Jur.2d, Joint Ventures § 4, and cases cited therein.

From our reading of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Largay Enterprises, Inc. v. Berman, supra, we conclude that service of process upon one member of a joint enterprise is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction over another member under the law of this state.

Therefore, in light of our determination of this case it is unnecessary to consider other points raised by the appellant in its brief.

For the reasons assigned, the order appealed is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss the amended complaint as it pertains to the appellant.

Reversed and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, RT01-99-002 and RT01-99-003; RT01-86-000, RT01-86-001 and RT01-86-002; RT01-95-000, RT01-95-001 and RT01-95-002; RT01-2-000, RT01-2-001, RT01-2-002 and RT01-2-003; RT01-98-000; RT02-3-000] 

Take notice that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and ISO New England, Inc. have posted on their internet Web sites information updating their progress on the resolution of Regional Transmission Operator seams. 

Any person desiring to file comments on this information should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such comments should be filed on or before the comment date. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. 

*Comment Date:*                     February 10, 2009.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-2155 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### MASSEY-ANDREWS, INC., Appellant, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Washington corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Albert Louis VENA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 45852.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 13, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 295 So.2d 720.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
# C_2005183EN.01000101.xml

| 26.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 July 2005

(2005/C 183/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2065 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4210 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5635 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9155 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,191 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,52 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1049 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5525 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,910 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6149 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5857 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4711 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3791 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7700 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0071 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 236,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0681 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7843 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2998 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 841,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,526 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,262 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5920 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2065

JPY

Japanese yen

134,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4210

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5635

ISK

Iceland króna

78,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9155

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

30,191

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,52

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1049

RON

Romanian leu

3,5525

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,910

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6149

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5857

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4711

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3791

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7700

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0071

KRW

South Korean won

1 236,36

ZAR

South African rand

8,0681

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7843

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2998

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 841,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,526

PHP

Philippine peso

67,262

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5920

THB

Thai baht

49,975

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1234890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2721862
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (35000)
<INVENTORY>                                     942861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4912445
<PP&E>                                         1978258
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1477173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6097670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           780873
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                      12025823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6097670
<SALES>                                        9749589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9749589
<CGS>                                          4441673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8870529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 68630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 939969
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (407000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1346969
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1346969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.554
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.557
        

</TABLE>
§ 588.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 588.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 588.407 .
*See also* § 588.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
HomeUkraine

# Ukraine

1744 items

        -    TIAS  		Ukraine (98-722) – Agreement Extending the Agreement of October 25, 1993 Concerning Operational Safety Enhancements, Risk Reduction Measures, and Nuclear Safety Regulation for Civilian Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine	  July 22, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Ukraine (96-1116) – Treaty Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment	  November 16, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Ukraine (93-1231) – Agreement Concerning Assistance to Ukraine in the Elimination of Strategic Nuclear Arms and the Prevention of Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  December 31, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Ukraine (92-623) – Agreement on Trade Relations with Exchanges of Letters	  June 23, 1992 

previous page1…173174175

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.67 Incentive payments for services furnished in Health Professional Shortage Areas. ( a ) *Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) physician bonus program.* A HPSA physician incentive payment will be made subject to the following: ( 1 ) HPSA bonuses are payable for services furnished by physicians as defined in section 1861(r) of the Act in areas designated as of December 31 of the prior year as geographic primary medical care HPSAs as defined in section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act.
( 2 ) HPSA bonuses are payable for services furnished by psychiatrists in areas designated as of December 31 of the prior year as geographic mental health HPSAs if the services are not already eligible for the bonus based on being in a geographic primary care HPSA.
( 3 ) Physicians eligible for the HPSA physician bonus are entitled to a 10 percent incentive payment above the amount paid for their professional services under the physician fee schedule.
( 4 ) Physicians furnishing services in areas that are designated as geographic HPSAs prior to the beginning of the year but not included on the published list of zip codes for which automated HPSA bonus payments are made must use the AQ modifier to receive the HPSA physician bonus payment.
( b ) *HPSA surgical incentive payment program.* A HPSA surgical incentive payment will be made subject to the following: ( 1 ) A major surgical procedure as defined in § 414.2 of this part is furnished by a general surgeon on or after January 1, 2011 and before January 1, 2016 in an area recognized for the HPSA physician bonus program under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) Payment will be made on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 10 percent of the Part B payment amount for major surgical procedures furnished as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, in addition to the amount the physician would otherwise be paid.
( 3 ) Physicians furnishing services in areas that are designated as geographic HPSAs eligible for the HPSA physician bonus program under paragraph (a)(1) of this section prior to the beginning of the year but not included on the published list of zip codes for which automated HPSA surgical incentive payments are made should report HCPCS modifier -AQ to receive the HPSA surgical incentive payment.
( 4 ) The payment described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is made to the surgeon or, where the surgeon has reassigned his or her benefits to a critical access hospital (CAH) paid under the optional method, to the CAH based on an institutional claim.
[75 FR 73617, Nov. 29, 2010]
# C_2006074EN.01000303.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce by order of that court of 6 December 2005 in criminal proceedings against Gianluca Damonte

(Case C-466/05)

(2006/C 74/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Lecce (Italy) of 6 December 2005, received at the Court Registry on 27 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in criminal proceedings against Gianluca Damonte on the following question:

| | Is Article 4(4 bis) of Law No 401/89 incompatible — with resultant effects on the domestic legal system — with the principles laid down in Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty on establishment and freedom to provide cross-border services, also in light of the conflict between the interpretations in the decisions of the European Court of Justice (in particular in the judgment in Gambelli) and decision No 23271/04 of the Suprema Corte di Cassazione a Sezioni Unite (United Chambers of the Supreme Court of Cassation); in particular, clarification is sought as to the applicability in the Italian State of the criminal provisions set out in the charge brought? |
| --- | --- |

Is Article 4(4 bis) of Law No 401/89 incompatible — with resultant effects on the domestic legal system — with the principles laid down in Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty on establishment and freedom to provide cross-border services, also in light of the conflict between the interpretations in the decisions of the European Court of Justice (in particular in the judgment in Gambelli) and decision No 23271/04 of the Suprema Corte di Cassazione a Sezioni Unite (United Chambers of the Supreme Court of Cassation); in particular, clarification is sought as to the applicability in the Italian State of the criminal provisions set out in the charge brought?

Gambelli

---
# Egypt

274 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 23, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 23, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  February 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 19, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 19, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 17, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 17, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 16, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 16, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Egypt	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Egypt	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Egypt	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Egypt	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Egypt	  March 11, 2020 

previous page1…232425262728next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Fiscal Year 2010 Safety Grants

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA is correcting a notice that appeared in the Federal 
Register on August 12, 2009 (74 FR 40638), which informed the public of 
FMCSA's Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 safety grant opportunities and FMCSA's 
changes to its application and award processes for grant programs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding this 
notice please contact, Ms. Theresa Rowlett at 202.366.6406. Staff may 
be reached at FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 
Office hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., EST, Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For FMCSA's FY 2010 Grants notice published 
on August 12, 2009 (74 FR 40638), the following corrections are made:
    On page 40638, in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, the 
contact for the Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks 
Grants (CVISN) is corrected from ``CVISN Grants--Julie Lane, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b312e37323e75373a353e1b3f342f753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a504f56535f14565b545f7a5e554e145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-385-2391'' to ``CVISN Grants--Quon Kwon, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c6d69737232776b7d725c787368327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86f7f3e9e8a8edf1e7e8c6e2e9f2a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-385-2389''.
    On page 40638, in the FY 2010 Safety Grants Program section, the 
schedule for the New Entrant Safety Audit Grants and the Motor Carrier 
Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) High Priority Grants is corrected 
from ``New Entrant Safety Audit Grants--September 1, 2009, MCSAP High 
Priority Grants--October 15, 2009'' to ``New Entrant Safety Audit 
Grants--October 15, 2009, MCSAP High Priority Grants--September 15, 
2009.''

    Issued on August 24, 2009.
William A. Quade,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. E9-21019 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
             of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 408.43 Deduction from social security benefits.

SSA, acting as CMS's agent, deducts the premiums from the monthly social security benefits if the enrollee is not entitled to railroad retirement benefits. (If the benefit is less than the monthly premium, the benefit is withheld and the enrollee is required to pay the balance through direct remittance.)