### __________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. ) MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP , and ) CATLETTSBURG REFINING , LLC, ) ) Defendant s. ) ) __________________________________________)
CONSENT DECREE

### TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 II. APPLICABILITY
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 III. DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. CIV IL PENALTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 V. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 A. Instrumentation and Monitoring Systems
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 B. Waste Gas Minimization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 C. Flare Combustion Efficiency
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 D. Miscellaneous
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 E. NSPS Subpart A, J, and Ja Applicability
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 F. Incorporation of Consent Decree Requirements into Federally Enforceable Permits
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 VI. EM ISSION CREDIT GENERATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 VI I. MITIGATION PROJECT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 VII I. REPORTING REQUIREMEN TS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 IX
. STIPULATED PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 X. FORCE MAJEURE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 XI. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 XII. INFORMATION COLLECTION AND RETENTION . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 XI II. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 XIV. COSTS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 XV. NOTICES
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 XV I. EFFECTIVE DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 XV II. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 XVI II. MODIFICATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88

i

### XIX. TERMINATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 XX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 XX I. SIGNATORIES/SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 XX II. INTEGRATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 XXI II. FINAL JUDGMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

ii

### TABLE S OF APPENDICES TABLE 1
NUMBER ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION 1.1 S- Drwgs Drawings Illustrating Lower, Center, and Upper Steam Injection in Various Types of Flare Tips 1.2 Gen

- Eq General Equations 1.3 LFL C alculating NHV cz - limit 

### and NHV cz 

### for Steam

- Assisted Flares 1.4 Malf -Pol EPA’s Policy on Excess Emissions during Malfunction s , Sta rtup, and Shutdown 1.5 MFR

- Eq Calculating Momentum Flux Ratio 1.6 Tip

- Area

- Eq Calculating the Unobstructed Cross Sectional Area of Various Types of Flare Tips 1.7 G- Drwg Depiction of Gases Associated with Steam

- Assisted Flares 1.8 Flr

- Data -Rpt Outline of Requirements for the Flare Data and Initial Monitoring Systems Report 1.9 GC -Cmpnds List of Compounds a Gas Chromatograph must be Capable of Speciating 1.10 Tech

- Specs Equipment and Instrumentation Technical Specifications and Quality Assurance/Qualit y Control Requirements 1.11 WG

- Map Waste Gas Mapping: Level of Detail Needed to Show Main Headers and Process Unit Headers 1.12 DW DF- Drwgs Representations of Discontinuous Wake Dominated Flow 1.13 Stips

- Calc Calculating the Amount of Stipulated Penalt ies Due for Violating Limitations on Flaring when the Stipulated Penalties are Based on Excess VOCs and SO 2 

### Emitted

iii

### TABLE 2
NUMBER ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION 2.1 MPC -Cmplnc- Sch Covered Flares and Applicability Dates for Certain Consent Decree Requireme nts 2.2 MPC TC 

### - SCF

- Eq Calculating the Total Steam Mass and Volumetric Flow Rate s as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor at the Texas City Main Flare 2.3 MPC PFTIR 

### - Prtcl

- Otln Outline of Protocol for Performance of P assive FTIR Testing at Robinson Fla re 84

- F1 (full protocol not necessary; MPC already twice has performed this type of testing) 2.4 MPC GRYVL 

### - Test

- Prtcl Flare Performance Test Plan for the GME Ground Flare Burners at the Garyville Refinery 2.5 MPC

- Test -Rpt- Otln Outline of Contents of Repo rts for Emissions and Flare Combustion Efficiency Testing (full outline not necessary: MPC already twice has prepared reports fo r emissions and combustion efficiency testing) 2.6 Mitig

- Prjct MPC’s Detroit Refinery – Sludge Handling System

iv

### CONSENT DECREE WHEREAS Plaintiff the United States of America ( “ United States ”), on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“ EPA ” ), has filed a complaint against Defendant s Marathon Petroleum Company LP and its wholly owned subsidiary, Catlettsburg Refining, LLC ( collectively “ MPC ”), concurrently with the lodging of this Consent Decree , for alleged environmental violations at all of MPC’s petroleum refineries , which are located in Robinson, Illinois; Catlettsburg, Kentucky; Garyville, Louisiana; Detroit, Michigan; Canton, Ohio; and Texas City, Texas (“Covered Refineries”); WHEREAS, on information and belief, the United States allege s that MPC has violated and/or continues to violate , at the Covered Refineries, the following statutory and regulato ry provisions:
a. The Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) requirements found in 42 U.S.C. § 7475 and 40 C.F.R. §§ 52.21(a)(2)(iii) and 52.21(j)– 52.21(r)(5); b. The Non-Attainment New Source Review (“NNSR”) requirements found in 42 U.S.C. §§ 7502(c)(5), 7503(a)–(c) and 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix S, Part IV, Conditions 1–4;
c. The federally enforceable Minor New Source Review (“Minor NSR”) requirements adopted and implemented by the Relevant States in their State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) p ursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(C) and 40 C.F.R. §§ 51.160–51.164; d. The New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) promulgated at 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subparts A, J, VV, VVa, GGG, and GGGa, pursuant to Section 111 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7411;
e. The N ational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAPs”) promulgated at 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subparts A, CC, and UUU, pursuant to Section 112 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7412; f. The requirements of Title V of the CAA found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661a(a), 7661b(c), 7661c(a); and 40 C.F.R. §§ 70.1(b), 70.5(a) and (b), 70.6(a) and (c), and 70.7(b);

1

### g. The portions of the Title V permits for the Covered Refineries that adopt, incorporate, or implement the provisions cited in a– e and h

– i; h. The federally enforceable SIPs for Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas that incorporate, adopt, and/or implement the federal requirements listed in a –b and d–f; i. Additional, federally enforceable SIP regulations on a State- by

- State, Refinery

- by

- Refinery basis; and j. The emergency notification requirements of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9603(a), and of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 11004(b). WHEREAS MPC do es not admit any liability to the United States arising out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in the Comp laint ; WHEREAS, in March 2008, EPA began investigating MPC’s compliance with provisions of the CAA related to flares and shortly thereafter EPA and MPC commenced negotiations that included EPA’s identification of actions that MPC should take to reduce flar e emissions , and MPC immediately started taking such actions at that time; WHEREAS , since 2008, MPC has provided a unique level of resources, expertise, and assistance to EPA to develop and advance the scientific knowledge and technology for measuring emis sions of volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) and hazardous air pollutants (“HAPs”) from industrial flares , including but not limited to:

**•** Developing the protocol for and conducting the first- ever test o f emissions from an operating, industrial flare using a then -new measurement technology called Passive Fourier Transfer Infrared (“PFTIR”) Spectroscopy **•** Implementing the PFTIR test at its Texas City refinery over a range of vent gas compositions and steam- to -vent- gas ratios to better define how to achieve 98% combustion efficiency (“CE”) from operating, industrial flares **•** Replicating the PFTIR test at a nother operating flare at the Detroit R efinery to improve the test method and accelerate technology development **•** Assuring rigorous and scientifically valid data c ollection **•** Preparing comprehensive and thorough PFTIR test reports for general distribution and use **•** Assisting in generating a consensus regarding the validity of PFTIR as a method for measuring emissions from flares
2

### • Evaluating the viability and reliability of an infrared smoke detector to maintain flare operation at the “incipient smoke point,” which is the visible manifestation of the point of highest CE ; WHEREAS, since 2008, MPC has provided a unique level of cooperation to EPA to advance the understandin g of the relationship between flare operating parameters and flare combustion efficiency, including but not limited to :

**•** Evaluating the relationship between the net heating value (“NHV”) of the gas in the combustion zone of a flare and a flare’s CE **•** Isolating the effects of not just MPC’s typical vent gas compositions on a flares’ CE but also the effects of olefins such as propylene and butylene and inerts such as hydrogen and nitrogen **•** Leading the development of the theoretical and practical basis for dynamically calculating the NHV of the gas in a flare’s combustion zone and comparing it to the use of a static limit **•** Comparing actual Total S team
- to
- Ve nt-G as (“S/VG”) ratios to those predicted by the S/VG ratios in the American Petroleum Institute’s Recommended Practice 521 to assist in the evaluation of S/VG as an appropriate metric of CE **•** Evaluating the effect of wind on CE, including developing white papers regarding Momentum Flux Ratio (“MFR”) and Steam Contribution Factor (“SCF”); WHEREAS MPC has represente d that it incurred costs in excess of $2.4 million in undertaking the efforts described in the preceding two paragraphs; WHEREAS EPA regards MPC’s efforts as instrumental in accelerating the means of measuring VOC and HAP emissions from flares, reduc ing such emissions , and informing EPA’s enforcement efforts; WHEREAS MPC has agreed to install novel and unproven technology on a flare at its Robinson Refinery to determine whether such technology can reduce the minimum steam requirements of steam

- assisted flares to ensure high CE at low vent gas flows; WHEREAS , since 2008, MPC has expended more than $45 million to reduce emissions from all of its flares (“Covered Flares”) , including but not limited to installing , by the end of

3

### 2011, the full suite of monitor ing equipment required by Section V.A of this Consent Decree on seventeen of MPC’S twenty
- two Covered Flares ; WHEREAS MPC estimates that it will spend an additional $6.5 million (for a total of $51.5 million) to further reduce emissions from the Covered Flares and also will spend an additional, undetermined sum to comply with the flaring cap in Section V.B of this Consent Decree and with 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subparts J and Ja; WHEREAS MPC estimates significant annual savings upon implementation of this consent decree through recovery of vent gas streams and reduced steam usage at its flares; WHEREAS , between 2008 and the end of 2011, EPA estimates that emissions from the Covered Flares have been reduced by approximately the following amounts (in “tons per yea r” or “TPY”) : Pollutant 2008–2011 V olatile Or ganic Compounds (“ VOC s”) 4,720 TPY Carbon Dioxide Equivalents ( “CO 2 

### e”) 119,500 TPY Hazardous A ir P ollutants (“HAPs”) 110 TPY WHEREAS, between the beginning of 2012 and the full implementation of the controls required by this Consent Decree, MPC projects additional reductions, with total reductions approximately as follows: Pollutant Beginning of 2012 through Implementation 2008 through Implementation VOCs CO 2 

### e HAPs 530 TPY 2200 TPY 30 TPY 5,250 TPY 121,700 TPY 140 TPY WHEREAS EPA estimates that , between 2008 and the end of 2011, emissions of sulfur dioxide (“SO 2 

### ”), hydrogen sulfide (“H 2 

### S”), and carbon monoxide (“CO”) from th e Covered

4

### Flares also have been reduced and that further reductions very likely will take place between the beginning of 2012 and full implementation of the controls required by this Consent Decree; WHEREAS MPC estimates that the mitigation project required pursuant to Section VII (Mitigation Project) of this Decree will cost approximately $2.2 million; WHEREAS MPC has installed ambient air monitors at or near the fence lines of four of its Refineries in order to better understand the impact of its operations on neighboring communities , and MPC shares the monitoring data with neighboring communities; WHEREAS MPC has been in the vanguard of the refining industry in its willingness to propose and agree to install and maintain ambient air monitors, including having spent approximately $5.4 million on such monitors since 2008; WHEREAS , by entering into this Consent Decree, MPC has indicated that it is committed to continuing to proactively reduce emissions from its flares; WHEREAS this Consent Decree is inte nded to represent a comprehensive resolution of the claims alleged in the Complaint and the claims resolved through Section XIII (Effect of Settlement) and to ensure that when the compliance measures required by this Decree have been fully implemented, eac h Covered Flare will be operated and maintained to prevent a recurrence of the violations alleged in the Complaint and the violations resolved through Section XIII (Effect of Settlement); WHEREAS the United States anticipate s that the specific and comprehensive compliance measures set forth in this Consent Decree, which are subject to a reasonable timetable for implementation, will result in the cessation of the violations alleged in the Complaint and the violations resolved through Section XIII (Effect of Settlement);

5

### WHEREAS MPC already has installed or has agreed to install through this Consent Decree Gas Chromatograph s to speciate and measure the constituents of all Vent Gas directed to all Covered Flares and will utilize these Gas Chromatographs to calculate the NHV of the Vent Gas directed to the Covered Flares; WHEREAS the response time of a Gas Chromatograph requires the use of an averaging time for the NHV of the Vent Gas that is longer than the averaging time needed for a flare that utilizes a Ve nt Gas Net Heating Value Analyzer/Calculator; WHEREAS, MPC already has submitted the report required in Paragraph 16 of this Consent Decree for the Covered Flares at its Catlettsburg Refinery, all of the Covered Flares at its Detroit Refinery except the C oker Flare (which is not yet in operation), and Covered Flares 84-F1, 84-F5, and 84-F6 at its Robinson Refinery; WHEREAS, the United States and MPC ( the “Parties”) recognize, and this Court by entering this Consent Decree finds, that this Consent Decree ha s been negotiated by the Parties in good faith and will avoid litigation between the Parties, and that this Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, and in the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony, without the adjudication or admi ssion of any issue of fact or law except as provided in Section I, and with the consent of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED as follows: I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, and 1355; Sections 113(b) and 167 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7413(b) and 7477 ; Section 325(b) of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 11045(b); Section 109(c) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9609(c); and over the Parties. Venue lies in this District pursuant to Section 113(b) of

6

### the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b); Section 325(b)(3) of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 11045(b)(3); Section 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b); and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 1395(a), because MPC reside s and is located in this judicial district and some of the violations alleged in the Complaint are alleged to have occurred in this judicial district. For purposes of this Decree, or any action to enforce this Decree, MPC consents to this Court’s jurisdiction over this Decree, over any action to enforce this Decree, and over MPC
. MPC also consents to venue in this judicial district. 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, MPC do es not contest that the Complaint states claims upon which relief may be granted
. 3. Notice of the commencement of this action has been given to Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas, under Section s 113(a)(1) and 113(b) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7413 (a)(1) and (b)
. II. APPLICABILITY 4. The obligations of this Consent Decree apply to and are binding upon the United States and upon MPC and any successors, assigns, and other entities or persons otherwise bound by law. 5. MPC shall give written notice of, and shall provide a copy of, the Consent Decree to any successors in interest at least sixty (60) days pr ior to the transfer of ownership or operation of any portion of the Covered Refineries. MPC shall notify the United States in accordance with the notice provisions in Section XV (Notice) of any successor in interest at least thirty days prior to any such transfer. 6. If MPC intends to request that the United States agree to a transferee’s assumption of any obligations of the Consent Decree, MPC shall condition any transfer, in whole

7

### or in part, of ownership of, operation of, or other interest (exclusive of an y non -controlling, non-operational shareholder interest) in the Covered Refinery upon the transferee’s written agreement to execute a modification to the Consent Decree that shall make the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree applicable to the transf eree. 7. As soon as possible prior to the transfer : (i) MPC shall notify the United States of the proposed transfer and of the specific Consent Decree provisions that MPC proposes the transferee assume; ( ii ) MPC shall certify that the transferee is contractu ally bound to assume the obligations and liabilities of this Consent Decree; and (iii) the transferee shall submit to the United States a certification that the transferee has the financial and technical ability to assume the obligations and liabilities of this Consent Decree and a certification that the transferee is contractually bound to assume the obligations and liabilities of this Consent Decree. 8. A fter the submission to the United States of the notice and certification required by the previous Paragra ph , either : (i) the United States , shall notify MPC that the United States does not agree to modify the Consent Decree to make the transferee responsible for complying with the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree; or ( ii ) the United States , MPC , an d the transferee shall file with the Court a joint motion requesting the Court approve a modification substituting the transferee for MPC as the Defendant responsible for complying with the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree. 9. If MPC does not secure the agreement of the United States to a joint motion within a reasonable period of time, then MPC and the transferee may file, without the agreement of the United States , a motion requesting the Court to approve a modification substituting the transferee for MPC as the Defendant responsible for complying with some or all of the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree. The United States may file an opposition to the motion. The

8

### motion to modify shall be granted unless MPC and the transferee : (i ) fail t o show that the transferee has the financial and technical ability to assume the obligations and liabilities of the Consent Decree; ( ii ) fail to show that the modification language effectively transfers the obligations and liabilities to the transferee; or ( iii ) the Court finds other good cause for denying the motion. 10. Except as provided in Paragraphs 5–9 and Section X (Force Majeure), MPC shall be responsible for ensuring that performance of the work contemplated under this Consent Decree is undertaken in accordance with the deadlines and requirements contained in this Consent Decree and any attachments hereto. MPC shall provide a copy of all applicable portions of this Consent Decree to all officers and employees whose duties might reasonably include compliance with any provision of this Decree. No later than the execution of any contract with a consulting or contracting firm that is retained to perform work required by this Consent Decree, MPC shall provide a copy of the applicable provisions of this Cons ent Decree to each such consulting or contracting firm. MPC shall condition any such contract upon performance of the work in conformity with the applicable terms of this Consent Decree. No later than thirty (30) days after the Date of Lodging of the Consent Decree, MPC also shall provide a copy of the applicable provisions of this Consent Decree to each consulting or contracting firm that MPC already has retained to perform the work required by this Consent Decree. Copies of the applicable provisions of the Consent Decree do not need to be supplied to firms who are retained to supply materials or equipment to satisfy requir ements of this Consent Decree. 11. In any action to enforce this Consent Decree, MPC shall not raise as a defense the failure by any of i ts officers, directors, employees, agents, or contractors to take any actions necessary to comply with the provisions of this Consent Decree.

9

### III. DEFINITIONS 12. Terms used in this Consent Decree that are defined in the CAA, EPCRA, or CERCLA, or in federal and state regulations promulgated pursuant to the CAA, EPCRA, or CERCLA , shall have the meaning assigned to them in the CAA, EPCRA, or CERCLA, or such regulations, unless otherwise provided in this Decree. Whenever the terms set forth below are used in th is Consent Decree, the fol lowing definitions shall apply:
a. “Active FTIR” shall mean an Active Fourier Transform Infrared System that consists of an infrared emission source and an infrared detector and analyzes the amount of thermal (infrared) radiatio n absorbed by a gas, and through measurement of the absorption spectra, identifies and quantifies the path -average concentration of the organic compounds in the gas. b. “Air

- Assisted Flare” shall mean a Flare that utilizes forced air piped to a Flare tip to assist in combustion; a Flare that utilizes a Minimum Steam Reduction System is a Steam -Assisted, not an Air- Assisted, Flare.
c. “Ambient Air” or “ air ” shall mean that portion of the atmosphere, external to buildings, to which persons have access. d. “Assist Air” or “ A ir asst 

### ” shall mean all air that intentionally is introduced into an Air- Assisted Flare to assist in combustion. Assist Air does not include A mbient A ir, air introduced through in a Minimum Steam Reduction System, or air entrained in V ent Gas.
e. “Automatic Control System” shall mean a system that utilizes programming logic to automate the operation of the instrumentation and systems required in Paragraphs 18–23 of this Decree so as to produce the operational results required in Parag raphs 43, 46–49.

10

### f. “Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate” shall mean, for a particular Covered Flare, the daily average flow rate, in scfd, to the Flare, excluding all flows during periods of Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction. The flow rate data period that shall be used to determine Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate is set forth in Subparagraph 30 .b.ii. The Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate shall be identified in the Initial Waste Gas Minimization Plan due under P aragraph 30 and may be updated in subsequent Waste Gas Minimization Plans due under Paragraphs 31 and 32. g. “BTU/scf” shall mean British Thermal Unit per standard cubic feet. h. “Calendar Quarter” shall mean a three -month period ending on March 31, June 30, September 30, or December 31. i. “Canton Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Marathon Petroleum Company and located at 2408 Gambrinus Ave, SW, Canton, Ohio 44706. j. “Catlettsburg Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Catlettsburg Refining and located at 11631 US 23 South, Catlettsburg, Kentucky, 41129. k. “Catlettsburg Refining” shall mean Catlettsburg Refining, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Marathon Petroleum Company. l. “Center Steam” or “ S cen 

### ” shall mean steam piped into the center of a Flare stack or center of the lower part of the Flare tip where it mixes directly with Vent Gas without entraining air. Diagrams illustrating the meaning and location of Center, Lower, and Upper Steam are set forth in Appendix 1.1 to this Consent Decree.
m. “Center Steam Volumetric Flow Rate” or “ Q s- cen 

### ” shall mean the volumetric flow rate of Center Steam supplied to a Flare, in scfm, as either measured (if applicable) or estimated using best engineering judgment, on a 5 -minute block average.

11

### n. “Center Steam Mass Flow Rate” or “ ṁ s- cen 

### ” shall mean the mass flow rate of Center Steam supplied to a Flare, in pounds per hour, as either measured (if applicable) or estimated using best engineering judgment, on a 5-minute block average using Equation 2 in Appendix 1.2.
o. “Combustion Efficiency” or “ CE ” shall mean a Flare’s efficiency in converting the organic carbon compounds found in Vent Gas to carbon dioxide. Combustion Efficiency shall be determined as set forth in Equation 1 in Appendix 1.2. p. “Combustion Efficien cy Multipliers” or “ CE Multipliers” shall mean empirically derived factors that are used as multipliers of the Net Heating Value of the Vent Gas at its Lower Flammability Limit to ensure an acceptable Combustion Efficiency. The CE Multipliers are set fort h in Table 2 of Appendix 1.3 of this Consent Decree. q. “Combustion Zone” shall mean the area of the Flare flame where the combustion of Combustion Zone Gas occurs.
r. “Combustion Zone Gas” shall mean the mixture of all gases and steam found after t he Flare tip. This gas includes all Vent Gas, all Pilot Gas, all Total Steam (if the Flare is Steam

- Assisted), and all Assist Air (if the Flare is Air

- Assisted).
s. “Consent Decree” or “Decree” shall mean this Consent Decree, including any and all appendices attached hereto. t. “Covered Flare” shall mean each of the Flares (all of which are Steam -Assisted) set forth in Column A of Appendix 2.1 to this Consent Decree.
u. “Covered Refineries” shall mean the refineries owned and operated by MPC that have Flares that are subject to the requirements of this Consent Decree: the Canton, Catlettsburg, Detroit, Garyville, Robinson, and Texas City Refineries.

12

### v. “Date of Lodging of this Consent Decree” or “Date of Lodging” or “DOL” shall mean the date that t his Consent Decree is filed for lodging with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
w. “Date of Entry of this Consent Decree” or “Date of Entry” or “DOE” shall mean the Effective Date of this Consent Decree.
x. “Detroit Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Marathon Petroleum Company and located at 1300 South Fort St., Detroit, Michigan 48217. y. “Discontinuous Wake Dominated Flow” shall mean gas flow exiting a Flare tip that is identified visually by: i. T he presence of a flame that is: (1) immediately adjacent to the exterior of the Flare tip body; and (2) below the exit plane of the Flare tip; and ii. A discontinuous flame, such that pockets of flame are detached from the portion of the flame that is immediately adjacent to the exterior of the Flare tip body. Representations of Discontinuous Wake Dominated Flow are set forth in Appendix 1.12.
z. “Effective Date” shall have the definition set forth in Section XVI (Effect ive Date) of this Consent Decree.
aa . “Elevated Flare” shall mean a Flare that supports combustion at a tip that is situated at the upper end of a vertical conveyance ( e.g., pipe, duct); the combustion zone is elevated in order to separate the heat gener ated by combustion from people, equipment, or structures at grade level. bb. “EPA” shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency and any of its successor departments or agencies.

13

### cc . “Exit Velocity” shall mean the velocity (“ v ”) of the Vent Gas and Center Steam as they exit the flare tip. Exit Velocity shall be calculated by adding together the Vent Gas Volumetric Flow Rate and the Center Steam Volumetric Flow Rate , based on standard conditions, and dividing by the Unobstructed Cross Sec tional Area of the Flare Tip. dd. “External Power Loss” shall mean a loss in the supply of electrical power to a Covered Refinery that is caused by events occurring outside the boundaries of a Covered Refinery, excluding power losses due to an interruptible power service agreement.
ee . “First Updated Waste Gas Minimization Plan” or “First Updated WGMP” shall mean the document submitted pursuant to Paragraph 31 as the first update to the Initial WGMP. ff
. “Flare” shall mean a comb ustion device that uses an uncontrolled volume of Ambient Air to burn gases. gg. “Garyville Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Marathon Petroleum Company and located at 4663 Airline Highway, Garyville, Louisiana 70051. hh. “Garyville Ground Flares” shall mean the two Ground Flares located at MPC’s Garyville Refinery and designated by MPC as “GME North Ground, No. 259-1401” and “GME South Ground, No. 259-1402.” ii
. “Ground Flare” shall mean a Flare or array of Flare tips that suppo rts combustion at or near grade level and uses some form of shielding or barrier to separate the heat generated by combustion from people, equipment, and structures at grade level. Ground Flares include Flares that are partially enclosed.

14

### jj
. “Initial Waste Gas Minimization Plan” or “Initial WGMP” shall mean the document submitted pursuant to Paragraph 30. kk. “Lower Flammability Limit” or “ LFL ” shall mean the lowest volumetric concentration of a combustible gas in air that, at a given temperature and pressure, will still combust. ll
. “Lower Flammability Limit of Vent Gas” or “ LFL vg 

### ” shall mean the weighted average of the LFLs of each of the individual compounds in Vent Gas, weighted by their volume fraction in the Vent Gas. LFL vg 

### is represented by and shall be calculated according to Equation 1 in Appendix 1.3 of this Consent Decree.
mm . “Lower Heating Value” or “ LHV ” shall mean the theoretical total quantity of heat liberated by the complete combustion of a unit volume or weight of a fuel initiall y at 25 degrees Centigrade and 760 mmHg, assuming that the produced water is vaporized and all combustion products remain at, or are returned to, 25 degrees Centigrade; however, the standard for determining the volume corresponding to one mole is 20 degree s Centigrade.
nn. “Lower Steam” shall mean steam piped to an exterior annular ring near the lower part of a Flare tip, which entrains Ambient Air which flows through tubes to the Flare tip, and ultimately exits the tubes at the top of the Flare tip. Diagrams illustrating the meaning and location of Center, Lower, and Upper Steam are set forth in Appendix 1.1 to this Consent Decree. oo. “Malfunction” shall mean any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not Malfunctions. In any action under this Consent Decree involving this

15

### definition, MPC shall have the burden of proving a Malfunction and, in interpreting this definition, the ten requirements for a “malfunction” set forth in Section II (“ Affirmative Defenses for Malfunctions” ) of EPA’s Policy on Excess Emissions during Malfunctions, Startup, and Sh utdown shall apply. This Policy is attached as Appendix 1.4. pp. “Marathon Petroleum Company” shall mean Marathon Petroleum Company LP. qq. “Minimum Steam Rate” or “Minimum Steam” shall mean the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate, in standard cubic feet per minute , or Total Steam Mass Flow Rate, in pounds per hour, recommended by the manufacturer of a Flare’s tip at the time of flare tip installation, or such lower Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate or Total Steam Mass Flow Rate as determined by the Flare tip manufacturer after Flare tip installation upon re -examination of the tip’s requirements.
rr . “Minimum Steam Reduction System” or “MSRS” shall mean a system that utilizes a mixed stream of air and steam to reduce the M inimum S team requirements of a St eam - Assisted Flare.
ss . “Minimum Steam Reduction System Air” or “ Air MSRS 

### ” shall mean the air intentionally introduced in an MSRS to reduce the minimum steam requirements of a Steam

- Assisted Flare. tt . “Momentum Flux Ratio” or “ MFR ” shall mean the ratio of the Vent Gas and Center Steam momentum flux to the wind momentum flux, where momentum flux is the momentum per unit area, per unit time. MFR characterizes the degree to which the Ambient Air affects the trajectory of the Vent Gas and Center Steam just as it exits the Flare tip. MFR is represented by Equation 1 in Appendix 1.5 and shall be calculated in accordance with the

16

### equations, conversion factors, MFR constants, MFR measured variables, and MFR calculated variables set forth in Appendix 1.5.
uu. “MPC” shall mean the Marathon Petroleum Company and Catlettsburg Refining.
vv. “MPC’s PRI Consent Decree” shall mean the Petroleum Refinery Initiative Consent Decree, as amended and revised, entered in an action styled United States , et al. v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC , Civ. Act. No. 4:01- CV -40119 (S.D. Mi).
ww . “Net Heating Value” shall mean Lower Heating Value.
xx. “Net Heating Value of Combustion Zone Gas” or “ NHV cz 

### ” shall mean the Lower Heating Value, in BTU/scf, of the Combustion Zone Gas i n a Flare. NHV cz 

### is represented by Equation 5.a or 5.b in Appendix 1.3 to this Consent Decree and shall be calculated in accordance with Equations 5 –8 of Appendix 1.3. To the extent a Covered Flare is equipped with a Minimum Steam Reduction System, MPC a lso shall use Equations 9– 13 to calculate NHV cz 

### . yy. “Net Heating Value of Combustion Zone Gas Limit” or “ NHV cz - limit 

### ” shall mean the minimum Net Heating Value that the Combustion Zone Gas must have to ensure an acceptable Combustion Efficiency. NHV cz - limit 

### shall be calculated no less than one time every 15 minutes through the use of Equation 4 in Appendix 1.3 of this Consent Decree.

zz . “Net Heating Value of Hydrogen as Adjusted” or “ NHV H2

- adj 

### ” shall mean 1212 BTU/scf. NHV H2

- adj 

### represents an adjus tment to hydrogen’s actual Net Heating Value for use, consistent with Step 3 of Appendix 1.3, in the calculation of the NHV vg 

### . aaa . “Net Heating Value of Vent Gas” or “ NHV vg 

### ” shall mean the Lower Heating Value, in BTU/scf, of the Vent Gas directed to a Flare. NHV vg 

### is calculated as set forth in Equation 2 of Appendix 1.3.

17

### bbb. “Net Heating Value of Vent Gas at its Lower Flammability Limit” or

“ NHV vg - LFL 

### ” shall mean the Lower Heating Value, in BTU/scf, of the Vent Gas at its LFL. NHV vg - LFL 

### is repres ented by and shall be calculated in accordance with Equation 3 of Appendix 1.3 of this Consent Decree.
ccc . “Non

- Mixing Total Steam” or “ S non - mix 

### ” shall mean the fraction of Total Steam supplied to a Flare that does not mix with the Vent Gas and therefore does not impact combustion. ddd. “Non

- Mixing Total Steam at the Texas City Main Flare” or “ S non - mix /TC

- MF 

### ” shall mean the Non

- Mixing Steam at the Texas City Main Flare and shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 1 in Appendix 2.2.
eee . “Passive FTIR” shall mean a Fourier Transform Infrared System that collects thermal (infrared) radiation emitted by a hot gas plume, and through the analysis of the resulting emission spectrum, identifies and quantifies the compounds producing values proportional to the path- integrated gas concentrations. fff
. “Pilot Gas” shall mean all gas introduced through the pilot tip of a Flare to maintain a flame. ggg. “Prevention Measure” shall mean an instrument, device, piece of equipment, system, process change, physical change to process equipment, procedure, or program to minimize or eliminate flaring. hhh. “Purge Gas” shall mean the minimum amount of gas introduced between a Flare header’s water seal and the Flare tip to prevent oxygen infiltration (backflow) int o the Flare tip. For a Flare with no water seal, the function of Purge Gas is performed by Sweep Gas, and therefore, by definition, such a Flare has no Purge Gas.

18

### iii
. “Reportable Flaring Incident” shall mean, for each of the following time periods, when any one of the following quantities is flared within a 24-hour period at a Covered Refinery:
From the submission of the Initial WGMP until the submission of First Updated WGMP From the submission of the First Updated WGMP through all times thereafter ≥ 500 lb SO2 ≥ 500,000 scf Waste Gas ≥ 500 lb SO2 Events that have the same root cause(s) that last more than 24 hours shall be considered a single incident. For purposes of calculating whether the triggering level of SO 2 

### emissions has been met, when flaring occurs at more than one Covered Flare at a Covered Refinery, the quantity of SO 2 

### from all Covered Flares involved shall be added together unless the root cause(s) of the flaring at the respective Covered Flares is(are) not related to each other. For purposes of calculating whether the triggering level of Waste Gas flow has been met, the following flows may be excluded: (i) the pro

- rated Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate (pro -rated on the basis of the duration of the Reportable Flaring Incident); and (ii) if MPC has instrumentation capable of measuring the volumetric flow rate of hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or steam in the Waste Gas, the contribution of all measured flows of any of these elements/compounds. When flaring occurs at more than one Covered Flare at a Covered Refinery, the volume of non- excluded Waste Gas flow at all Covered Flares involved shall be added together unless the root cause(s) of the flaring at the respective Covered Flares is(are) not related to each other. jjj . “Robinson Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Marathon Petroleum Company and located at 100 South Marathon, Ave., Robinson, Illinois 62454.

19

### kkk. “SCFD” or “scfd” shall mean standard cubic feet per day. lll
. “SCFM” or “scfm” shall mean standard cubic feet per minute.
mmm . “Shutdown” shall mean the cessation of operation for any purpose. nnn. “Smoke Emissions” shall have the definition set forth in Section 3.5 of Method 22 of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix A. Smoke Emissions may be documented either by a person certified pursuant to Method 22 or by a video camera.
ooo. “Standard Conditions” shall mean a temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit and a pressure of 1 atmosphere. Unless otherwise expressly set forth in th is Consent Decree or an Appendix, Standard Conditions shall apply. ppp. “Startup” shall mean the setting in operation for any purpose. qqq. “Steam

- Assisted Flare” shall mean a Flare that utilizes steam piped to a Flare tip to assist in combustion. A F lare that utilizes a Minimum Steam Reduction System is a Steam -Assisted, not an Air- Assisted, Flare.
rrr . “Steam Contribution Factor” or “ SCF ” shall mean the percentage of Total Steam that mixes in the Combustion Zone of a Flare flame.
sss . “Steam Co ntribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare” or “ SCF TC

- MF 

### ” shall mean the Steam Contribution Factor at the Texas City Main Flare and shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 2 of Appendix 2.2. ttt . “Supplemental Gas” shall mean all gas introduced to a Flare to comply with the net heating value requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(b), 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b), and/or Paragraph 46 of this Consent Decree.

20

### uuu. “ S/VG mass 

### ” or “Total

- Steam

- Mass

- Flow

- Rate

- to
- Vent

- Gas

- Mass

- Flow

Rate Ratio” shall mean the ratio of the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate to the Vent Gas Mass Flow Rate. vvv. “ S/VG vol 

### ” or “Total

- Steam

- Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate

- to
- Vent

- Gas

Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate Ratio” shall mean the ratio of the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate to the Vent Gas Volumetric Flow Ra te.
www . “Sweep Gas” shall mean: i. For a Flare with a Flare Gas Recovery System: the minimum amount of gas introduced into a Flare header in order to: (a) prevent oxygen buildup, corrosion, and/or freezing in the Flare header; and (b) maintain a safe f low of gas through the Flare header. Sweep Gas in these Flares is introduced prior to and is intended to be recovered by the Flare Gas Recovery System; ii. For a Flare without a Flare Gas Recovery System : the minimum amount of gas introduced into a Flar e header in order to: (a) prevent oxygen buildup, corrosion, and/or freezing in the Flare header; (b) maintain a safe flow of gas through the Flare header , including a higher flow during hot taps; and (c) prevent oxygen infiltration (backflow) into the Flare tip.
xxx. “Texas City Main Flare” shall mean the Elevated Flare located at MPC’s Texas City Refinery and designated by MPC as the “Main Flare, 84FL -001.” yyy. “Texas City Refinery” shall mean the refinery owned and operated by Marathon Petroleum Company located at 502 10 th 

### Street South, Texas City, Texas 77590.

zzz . “Temporary

- Use Flare” shall mean a flare that receives Waste Gas that has been redirected to it from another flare for 504 hours or less on a rolling 1095-day average period.

21

### aaaa . “ Total Steam” or “ S ” shall mean the total of all steam that intentionally is introduced into a Steam- Assisted Flare to assist in combustion. Total Steam includes, but is not limited to, Lower Steam, Center Steam, and Upper Steam. bbbb. “Total Steam Mass Flow Rate” or “ ṁ s 

### ” shall mean the mass flow rate of Total Steam supplied to a Flare, in pounds per hour as calculated on a 5-minute block average. Total Steam Mass Flow Rate shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 3 of Appendix 1.2.
cccc . “Total S team Mass Flow Rate as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor” or “ ṁ s- adj 

### ” shall mean the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate, in pounds per hour on a 5-minute block average, as adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor. dddd. “Total Steam Mass Flow Rate as A djusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare” or “ ṁ s- adj/TC

- MF 

### ” shall mean the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate, in pounds per hour on a 5-minute block average, as adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare. Total Steam Mass Flow Rate as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 4A of Appendix 2.2.
eeee . “Total

- Steam

- Mass

- Flow

- Rate

- to
- Vent

- Gas

- Mass

- Flow

- Rate Ratio” or

“ S/VG mass 

### ” sha ll mean the ratio of the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate to the Vent Gas Mass Flow Rate
. ffff
. “Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate” or “ Q s 

### ” shall mean the volumetric flow rate of Total Steam supplied to a Flare, in scfm as measured on a 5 -minute block average. gggg. “Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor” or “ Q s- adj 

### ” shall mean the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate, in scfm on a 5-minute block average, as adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor.

22

### hhhh. “Total Steam Vo lumetric Flow Rate as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare” or “ Q s- adj/TC

- MF 

### ” shall mean the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate, in scfm on a 5-minute block average, as adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texa s City Main Flare. Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate as Adjusted by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 4B of Appendix 2.2 iiii
. “Total

- Steam

- Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate

- to
- Vent

- Gas

- Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate Ratio” or “ S/VG vol 

### ” shall mean the ratio of the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate to the Vent Gas Volumetric Flow Rate. jjjj . “Unobstructed Cross Sectional Area of the Flare Tip” or “ A tip

- unob 

### ” shall mean the open, unobstructed area of a Flare tip through which Vent Gas and Center Steam pass. Diagrams of four common flare types are set forth in Appendix 1.6 together with the equations for calculating the A tip

- unob 

### of these four types. kkkk. “Upper Steam,” sometimes called Ring Steam, shall mean steam piped to nozzles located on the exterior perimeter of the upper end of a Flare tip. Diagrams illustrating the meaning and location of Center, Lower, and Upper Steam are set forth in Appendix 1.1 to this Consent Decree. llll
. “Velocity of the W ind” or “ v wind 

### ” shall mean the velocity of the Ambient Air, in ft/s on a five

- minute block average, measured at the Meteorological Station required pursuant to Paragraph 23 of this Consent Decree.
mmmm . “Vent Gas” shall mean the mixture of all gases foun d just prior to the Flare tip. This gas includes all Waste Gas, Sweep Gas, Purge Gas, and Supplemental Gas, but does not include Pilot Gas, Total Steam, or Assist Air.

23

### nnnn. “Vent Gas Volumetric Flow Rate” or “ Q vg 

### ” shall mean the volumetric flow rate of Vent Gas directed to a Covered Flare, in wet scfm, on a 5

- minute block average basis.
oooo. “Vent Gas Mass Flow Rate” or “ ṁ vg 

### ” shall mean the mass flow rate of Vent Gas directed to a Covered Flare, in pounds per hour on a 5-minute block average. Vent G as Mass Flow Rate shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 4 of Appendix 1.2. pppp. “Vent Gas Molecular Weight” or “ MW vg 

### ” shall mean the Molecular Weight, in pounds per pound-mole, of the Vent Gas, on a 5-minute block average. qqqq. “Visible Emissi ons” shall mean five minutes or more of Smoke Emissions during any two consecutive hours. For purposes of this Consent Decree, Visible Emissions may be documented by either a person certified pursuant to Method 22 or by a video camera.
rrrr . “VOC” or “V olatile Organic Compounds” shall have the definition set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 51.100(s).
ssss . “VOC Vent Gas Concentration” shall mean the volumetric concentration of VOCs in the Vent Gas and shall be calculated as set forth in Equation 15 of Appendix 1.3. tttt . “Waste Gas” shall mean the mixture of all gases from facility operations that is directed to a flare for the purpose of disposing of the gas. “Waste Gas” does not include gas introduced to a flare exclusively to make it operate safely and as intended; therefore, “Waste Gas” does not include Pilot Gas, Total Steam, Assist Air, or the minimum amount of Sweep Gas and Purge Gas that is necessary to perform the functions of Sweep Gas and Purge Gas. “Waste Gas” also does not include gas introduced to a flare to comply with regulatory requirements; therefore, “Waste Gas” does not include Supplemental Gas. Depending upon the instrumentation that measures Waste Gas, certain compounds (hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen,

24

### carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and/or w ater (steam)) that are directed to a Flare for the purpose of disposing of these compounds may be excluded from calculations relating to Waste Gas flow; in Part V of this Consent Decree, the circumstances in which such exclusions are permitte d are specific ally identified. A ppendix 1.7 to this Consent Decree depicts the meaning of “Waste Gas,” together with its relation to other gases associated with Flares. IV. CIVIL PENALTY 13. By no later than 30 days after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree , MPC shall pay the sum of $460,000 as a civil penalty. MPC shall pay the civil penalty by FedWire Electronic Funds Transfer (“ EFT ”) to the U.S. Department of Justice in accordance with written instructions to be provided to MPC, following lodging of the Consent D ecree, by the Financial Litigation Unit of the U.S. Attorney = s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan , 211 W. Fort St, Detroit, MI, 48226. At the time of payment, MPC shall send a copy of the EFT authorization form, the EFT transaction record, and a transmittal letter: (i) to the United States in the manner set forth in Section XV of this Decree (Notices) ; (ii) by email to acctsreceivable.CINWD@epa.gov ; and (iii) by mail to: EPA Cincinnati Finance Office 26 Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 The transmittal letter shall state that the payment is for the civil penalty owed pursuant to the Consent Decree in United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP , et al. , and shall reference the civil action number, USAO File Number 2011V01341, and DOJ case number 90 -5-2-1- 09915. 14. If any portion of the civil penalty due to the United States is not paid when due, MPC shall pay interest on the amount past due, accruing from the Effective Date through the

25

### date of payment, at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Interest payment under this Paragraph shall be in addition to any stipulated penalty due. 15. MPC shall not deduct any penalties paid under this Decree pursuant to this Section or Section IX (Stipulated Penalties) in calculating its federal income tax. V. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Instrumentation and Monitoring Systems 16. Flare Data and Monitoring Systems and Protocol Report (“Flare Data and Monitoring Systems and Protocol Report”) . F or th e Covered Flares at the Canton, Garyville, and Texas City Refineries, the Coker Flare at the Detroit Refinery , and the Covered Flares identified
as 84-F2, 84-F3, and 84-F4 at the Robinson Refinery, by no later than the dates set forth in Column B of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall submit a report, consistent with the requirements in Appendix 1.8, to EPA that includes the following:
a. The information, diagrams, and drawings specified in Paragraphs 1 –8 of Appendix 1.8; b. A detailed description of each instrument and piece of monitoring equipment, including the specific model and manufacturer, that MPC has installed or will install in compliance with Paragraphs 18–23 of this Consent Decree (Paragraph 9 of Appendix 1.8);
c. A narrative description of the monitoring methods and calculations that MPC shall use to comply with the requirements of Paragraphs 46–48 (Paragraph 10 of Appendix 1.8) and d. The identification of the calibration gases to be used to comply with Subparagraph V.B.1 of Appendix 1.10 (Paragraph 11 of Appendix 1.8). For any H 2 

### S CEMS required pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J or Subpart Ja, this report shall satisfy the notification requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 60.7(a)(5). 17. Installation and Operation of Monitoring Systems . By no later than the dates set forth in Column C of Appendix 2.1, for each Covered Flare, MPC shall have completed the

26

### installation and commenced the operation of the instrumentation, controls, and monitoring systems set forth in Paragraphs 18–23. 18. Vent Gas Flow Monitoring System
. This system shall:
a. Continuously measure and calculate the total flow, in scfm and pounds per hour, of all Vent Gas; b. Continuously analyze pressure and temperature at each point of Vent Gas flow measurement;
c. Have dual channel measurement at each point of Vent Gas flow measurement; and d. Have retractable or removable sensors at each point of Vent Gas flow measurement to ensure that the Vent Gas Flow Monitoring System is maintainable online. 19. Vent Gas Average Molecular Weight Analyzer
. Th is instrument or system shall continuously analyze the average molecular weight of all Vent Gas. This analysis may be performed by an instrument that also serves as part of a Vent Gas Flow Monitoring System. 20. Total Steam Flow Monitoring System
. This syste m shall:
a. Continuously measure and calculate the flow, in scfm and pounds per hour, of the Total Steam to the Covered Flare; and b. Continuously analyze the pressure and temperature of s team at a representative point of s team flow measurement
. 21. Steam Co ntrol Equipment . This equipment, including, as necessary, main and trim control valves and piping, shall enable MPC to control steam flow in a manner sufficient to ensure compliance with this Decree. 22. Gas Chromatograph (“GC”) . This instrument shall be capable of speciating the Vent Gas constituents set forth in Appendix 1.9. For all constituents except Hydrogen Sulfide (“H 2 

### S”), the GC shall measure the concentration on a mole percent (“mol/mol%”) basis; for H 2 

### S, the GC shall measure the concentration on a parts per million volume basis (“ppmv”). The

27

### sample extraction point of the gas chromatograph may be located upstream of the introduction of Supplemental and/or Sweep and/or Purge Gas if the composition and flow rate of any such Supplemental and/or Sweep and/or Purge Gas is a known constant and if this constant then is used in the calculation of the volume percent of all gas constituents of the Vent Gas. 23. Me teorologic al Station or “Met Station ” (for each Covered Refinery, not each Covered Flare). This sta tion shall include meteorological data instruments capable of measuring wind speed. The station at each Covered Refinery shall be placed at a location where wind is representative of conditions at the elevated Covered Flare with the largest estimated volu me of Waste Gas after Waste Gas minimization is complete. The Meteorological Station shall be located as high as reasonably practicable but does not have to be as high as the Covered Flare. 24. Video Camera . For the first year after MPC is required to comply with Subparagraph 47 .b, MPC shall record the percentage of time that it manually overrides the Automatic Control System required in Subparagraph 43.b for the purpose of stopping Smoke Emissions that are occurring. For any Covered Flare that, for the purpose of stopping Smoke Emissions that are occurring, is operated in manual mode for 5% of the year or more , MPC shall install a Video Camera . MPC shall complete this installation by no later than the end of second year after MPC is required to comply with Subparagraph 47.b. The Video Camera shall record, in digital format, the flame of, and any Smoke Emissions from, the Covered Flare. 25. Instrumentation and Monitoring Systems: Optional Equipment for any Covered Flare . At its option, MPC may elect to install (if not already installed) and continuously measure and calculate flow, in scfm and pounds per hour, of all Pilot Gas to a Covered Flare. MPC may utilize the data generated by this system as part of the calculation of the Net Heating Value of the Combustion Zone Gas.

28

### 26. Instrumentation and Monitoring Systems: Specifications . The instrumentation and monitoring systems identified in Paragraphs 18 –20 and 22–23 shall meet or exceed the specifications set forth in Appendix 1.10. 27. Instrumentation and Monitoring S ystems: Recording and Averaging Time s . The instrumentation and monitoring systems identified in Paragraph s 18–20 and 22–24 shall be able to produce and record data measurements and calculations for each parameter at the following time intervals. Instrumentation and Monitoring System Recording and Averaging Times Vent Gas Flow; Vent Gas Average Molecular Weight; Total Steam Flow; Pilot Gas Flow (if installed) Measure continuously and record 5 minute block averages Gas Chromatograph Measure no less than once every 15 minutes and record that value Wind Speed Measure continuously and record 5 minute block averages Video Camera, if required Record at a rate of no less than 4 frames per minute Nothing in this Paragraph is intended to prohibit MPC from setting up process control logic that uses different averaging times from those in this table provided that the recording and averaging times in this table are available and used for determining compliance with this Consent Decree. 28. Instru mentation and Monitoring Systems: Operation and Maintenance. MPC shall operate each of the instruments and monitoring systems required in Paragraphs 18–20, 22– 23, and, if applicable, 24 , on a continuous basis except for the following periods:
a. Malfunct ion of an instrument; b. Maintenance following instrument Malfunction;

29

### c. Scheduled maintenance of an instrument in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended schedule; d. Quality Assurance/Quality Control activities; and/or
e. When the Covered F lare that the instrument or monitoring system is associated with is not in service. In no event, however, shall the excepted activities in Subparagraph 28 .a
– 28 .d for any instrument exceed 110 hours in any calendar quarter. The calculation of instrument d owntime shall be made in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.13(h)(2) and Paragraph VI of Appendix 1.10. If the excepted activities in Subparagraphs 28.a–28.d for any instrument exceed 110 hours in any calendar quarter, EPA shall be entitled to seek stipulated penalties as set forth in Subp aragraph 77.e of this Consent Decree and MPC shall be entitled to assert that the period of instrumentation and monitoring system downtime was justified under the circumstances. Nothing in this Paragraph is intended to preve nt MPC from claiming a force majeure defense to any period of instrumentation and/or monitoring system downtime. Nothing in this Paragraph supersedes or replaces the monitoring requirements, including operation, maintenance, and quality assurance/quality control requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subparts J and Ja (including monitoring requirements in Subpart Ja that may be stayed as of the Date of Lodging of this Consent Decree but may become effective after the Date of Lodging) at such time as those requirements become applicable pursuant to Paragraphs 58 and 59. All such requirements shall apply in accordance with the terms set forth in Subparts J and Ja. 29. Taking Certain Flares Out of Service
. By no later than December 31, 2012, MPC shall take the follo wing flares out of service by physically removing piping in the Flare header or physically isolating the piping with a welded blind so as to eliminate direct piping to these flares: the Canton South Flare designated as 04-14-B-002 and the Catlettsburg Pit ch Flare designated as

30

### 1-14- FS -1. To the extent that any operating permit of MPC’s allows for the operation of these flares, MPC shall submit a request to the applicable state agency by no later than 6 months after taking these flares out of service, to a mend the operating permit to reflect the permanent disconnection of these flares. B. Waste Gas Minimization 30. Initial Waste Gas Minimization Plan (“Initial WGMP”) . By no later than the dates set forth in Column D of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall submit to EPA an Initial Waste Gas Minimization Plan for each Covered Flare that discusses and evaluates flaring Prevention Measures both Refinery -wide and on a Flare- specific basis. The Initial WGMP shall include but not be limited to:
a. Updates . MPC shall submit upd ates, if and as necessary, to the information, diagrams, and drawings provided in the Flare Data and Monitoring Systems and Protocol Report required under Paragraph 16. b. Waste Gas Characterization and Mapping . MPC shall undertake to characterize the Waste Gas being disposed of at each Covered Flare and determine its source as follows: i. Volumetric (in scfm) and mass (in pounds ) flow rate . MPC shall identify the volumetric flow of Waste Gas, in scfm on a 30- day rolling average, and the mass flow rate, in pounds per hour on a 30- day rolling average, vented to each Covered Flare at the Covered Refinery for the one- year period of time between the date in Column C of Appendix 2.1 that applies to the Covered Flare and 31 days before the submission of the In itial WGMP. To the extent that, for any particular Covered Flare, MPC has instrumentation capable of measuring the volumetric and mass flow rate of hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or steam in the Waste Gas, MPC may break d own the volumetric and mass flow as between: (i) All Waste Gas flows excluding hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or water (steam); and (ii) hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen,

31

### carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or water (steam) flows in the Waste Gas. MPC may use either an engineering evaluation or measurements from monitoring or a combination to determine flow rate. In determining flow rate, flows during all periods (including but not limited to normal operations and periods of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction, process upsets, relief valve leakages, power losses due to an interruptible power service agreement, and emergencies arising from events within the boundaries of the Covered Refinery), except those described in the next sent ence, shall be included. Flows that could not be prevented through reasonable planning and are in anticipation of or caused by a natural disaster , act of war or terrorism, or E xternal P ower Loss are the only flows that shall be excluded from the calculati on of flow rate. MPC shall specifically describe the date, time, and nature of the event that results in the exclusion of any flows from the calculation. ii. Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rates
. MPC shall utilize flow rate data for the one- year period of time between the date in Column C of Appendix 2.1 that applies to the Covered Flare and 31 days before the submission of the Initial WGMP to determine the Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate, in scfd, to each Covered Flare. The Baseload Waste Gas Flow Rate shall not include flows during periods of Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction. iii. Identification of Constituent G ases . MPC shall use best efforts to identify the constituent gases within each Covered Flare’s Waste Gas and the percentage contribution of each such constituent during baseload conditions. MPC may use either an engineering evaluation or measurements from monitoring or a combination to determine Waste Gas constituents. iv. Waste Gas Mapping
. Using instrumentation, isotopic tracing, and/or engineerin g calculations, MPC shall identify and estimate the flow from each process unit header (sometimes referred to as a “subheader”) to the main header(s) servicing the Covered Flare
. Using that information and all other available information , MPC shall comple te an identification of each Waste Gas tie -in to the main header (s) and process unit header(s), as applicable, consistent with Appendix 1.11. Temporary connections to the main header(s) of a Covered Flare and/or process unit header(s) are not required to be included in the mapping.
c. Reductions previously realized . MPC shall describe the equipment, processes and procedures installed or implemented since January 2009 to reduce flaring. The

32

### description shall specify the date of installation or implemen tation and the amount of reductions realized. d. Planned reductions . MPC shall describe the equipment, processes, or procedures that MPC plans to install or implement to eliminate or reduce flaring. The description shall specify a schedule for expeditious installation and commencement of operation and a projection of the amount of reductions to be realized. Subsequent to the submission of the WGMP, MPC may revise the installation and operation dates provided that MPC does so in writing to EPA within a reasonable time of determining that such a revision(s) is(are) necessary and provides a reasonable explanation for the revised date(s). In formulating this plan, MPC specifically shall review and evaluate the results of the Waste Gas Mapping required by Subparagraph 30.b.iv.
e. Taking a Covered Flare Out of Service . MPC shall identify any Covered Flare that it intends to take out of service, including the date for completion of the decommissioning. Taking a Covered Flare “out of service” means physically removing piping in the Flare header or physically isolating the piping with a welded blind so as to eliminate direct piping to the Covered Flare. f. Prevention Measures . MPC shall describe and evaluate all Prevention Measures, including a schedule for the expeditious implementation and commencement of operation of all Prevention Measures, to address the following: i. Flaring that has occurred or may reasonab l y be expected to occur during planned maintenance activities, including Startup and Shutdown
. The evaluation shall include a review of flaring that has occurred during these activities since January 2009 and shall consider the feasibility of performing these activities without flaring.

33

### ii. Fl aring that may reasonably be expected to occur due to i ssues of gas quantity and quality . The evaluation shall include a general audit of the existing flare gas recovery capacity of each Covered Flare, the storage capacity available for excess Waste Gases, and the scrubbing capacity available for Waste Gases including any limitations associated with scrubbing Waste Gases for use as fuel. iii. Flaring caused by the recurrent failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner . The evaluation shall consider the adequacy of existing maintenance schedules and protocols for such equipment. A failure is “recurrent” if it occurs more than twice during any five year period as a result of the same cause. 31. First Updated Waste Gas Minimization Plan . By no later than the dates set forth in Column E of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall submit to EPA a First Updated WG MP which shall update for the 12-month period after the period covered by the Initial Waste Gas Minimization Plan, if and as necessary, the information required in Subp aragraph s 30 .a
– 30 .f and shall also include the following:
a. Updated Waste Gas Mapping . MPC shall update the Waste Gas mapping as more information becomes available. MPC shall use this updated mapping to plan reductions; b. Reductions B ase d on Root Cause Analysis . MPC shall review all of the Root Cause Analysis reports submitted under Paragraph 35 to determine if reductions in addition to the reductions achieved through any required corrective action under Paragraph 37 can be realized; and
c. Revised Schedule . To the extent that MPC proposes to extend any schedule set forth in the Initial WGMP, MPC may do so only with good cause. 32. Subsequent Updates to Waste Gas Minimization Plan . In the first semi -annual report required under Section VI II of this Decree (Reporting Requirements) that is due in July of the year that is one year after the submission of the First Updated WGMP, MPC shall submit a Second Updated WGMP. On an annual basis thereafter until termination of the Decree, MPC shall su bmit an updated WGMP as part of the July semi -annual report. Each update shall update,

34

### if and as necessary, the information required in Subparagraphs 30.a–30.f, 31.a, and 31.b. To the extent that MPC proposes to extend any schedule set forth in a previo us WGMP, MPC may do so only with good cause. 33. Waste Gas Minimization Plan: Implementation . By no later than the dates specified in a WGMP, MPC shall implement the actions described therein. If (i) no implementation date and/or (ii) no completion date for actions that do not require ongoing implementation (such as the installation of a piece of a equipment) is (are) set forth in the WGMP, the implementation and/or completion date shall be deemed the date of the submission of the WGMP. 34. Enforceability of WGM Ps . The terms of each WGMP (including Initial, First Updated, and Subsequent Updated WGMPs) submitted under this Consent Decree are specifically enforceable. 35. Root Cause Analysis for Reportable Flaring Incident
. a. Internal Reporting and Recordkeeping . Except as provided in Paragraphs 36 and 38.a, commencing on the dates set forth in the definition of “Reportable Flaring Incident” in Section I II of this Decree (Definitions) , by no later than forty- five days following the end of a Reportable Flaring Incid ent, MPC shall conduct an investigation into the Root Cause(s) of the Incident and prepare and keep as a record an internal report that shall include, at a minimum, the following: i. The date and time that the Reportable Flaring Incident started and ended; ii
. The volume of Waste Gas flared and an estimate of the quantity of VOCs and SO 2 

### that was emitted and the calculations that were used to determine that quantity; iii.
. The steps, if any, that MPC took to limit the duration of the

35

### Reportable Flaring Incident and quantity of VOC and/or SO 2 

### emissions associated therewith; iv
. A detailed analysis that sets forth the root cause and all contributing causes of the Reportable Flaring Incident, to the extent determinable;
v. An analysis of the measures, if any, that are available to reduce the likelihood of a recurrence of a Reportable Flaring Incident resulting from the same root cause or contributing causes in the future. The analysis shall discuss the alternatives, if any, that are available, the probable effectiveness and the cost of the alternatives, if an alternative is eliminated based on cost . Possible design and operation and maintenance changes shall be evaluated. If MPC concludes that corrective action(s) is (are) required under Paragraph 37 , the report shall include a description of the action(s) and, if not already completed, a schedule for its (their) implementation, including proposed commencement and completion dates. If MPC concludes that corrective action is not requir ed under Paragraph 37, the report shall explain the basis for that conclusion; and vi. To the extent that investigations of the causes and/or possible corrective actions still are underway 45 days after the Reportable Flaring Incident, a statement of the anticipated date by which a follow-up report fully conforming to the requirements of this Paragraph shall be completed. b. Submitting Summary of Internal Flaring Incident Reports . In each semi -annual report due under Section VIII of this Decree (Report ing Requirements), MPC shall include a summary of the following items for each Reportable Flaring Incident that occurred during the six-month period that the semi-annual report covers: i. Date; ii. Duration; iii. Amount of SO 2 

### and VOC released; iv. Root Cause(s);
v. Corrective Action(s) completed;

36

### vi. Corrective Action(s) still outstanding; and vii. An analysis of any trends identified by MPC in terms of the number of Incidents, the Root Causes, or the types of Corrective Action. 36. In lieu of preparing a new report under Paragraph 35 and analyzing and implementing corrective action under Paragraph 37 for a Reportable Flaring Incident that has as its root cause the same root cause as a previously reported Reportable Flaring Incident, MPC may cross - refere nce and utilize the prior report and analysis when preparing the report required by Paragraph 35. 37. Corrective Action Implementation . In response to any Reportable Flaring Incident occurring after the Date of Lodging, MPC shall take, as expeditiously as practicable, such interim and/or long-term corrective actions, if any, as are consistent with good engineering practice to minimize the likelihood of a recurrence of the root cause and all contributing causes of that Reportable Flaring I ncident. 38. Overlapping Requirements
. a. Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Requirements under MPC’s PRI Consent Decree
. To the extent that a Reportable Flaring Incident that is triggered solely by the SO 2 

### threshold in the definition of “Reportable Flaring Incident” also constitutes an Acid Gas or Hydrocarbon Flaring Incident under MPC’s PRI Consent Decree, MPC shall follow the provisions of MPC’s PRI Consent Decree, and not the provisions of this Decree, for addressing the incident, for as long as M PC’s PRI Consent Decree is in effect. b. Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Provisions of NSPS Subpart Ja . To the extent that currently stayed provisions of Subpart Ja of the New Source Performance Standards (“ NSPS ”) that affect the applicability of requirements to undertake root

37

### cause analys e s and corrective action s, 73 Fed. Reg. 78,522, 78,539 (Dec. 22, 2008), 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.103a(b),(c), are finalized after the Date of Lodging of this Consent Decree, and to the extent that compliance with those provisions overlaps with compliance with Paragraphs 35 and 37, MPC shall comply with the requirements of the finalized Subpart Ja and also comply with each requirement in Paragraphs 35 and 37 that is not inconsistent with the requirements of a finalized S ubpart Ja.
c. Flare Management Plan Provisions of NSPS Subpart Ja . To the extent that currently stayed provisions of Subpart Ja of the NSPS that affect the applicability of requirements to develop and implement flare management plans, 73 Fed. Reg. 78,522, 78,538-39 (Dec . 22, 2008), 40 C.F.R. § 60.103a(a), are finalized after the Date of Lodging of this Consent Decree, and to the extent that compliance with those provisions overlaps with compliance with Paragraphs 30–33, MPC shall comply with the requirements of the finalized Subpart Ja and also comply with each requirement in Paragraphs 30– 33 that is not inconsistent with the requirements of a finalized Subpart Ja. 39. Limitations on Flaring
. By no later than the dates set forth in Column I of Appendix 2.1, the following limitations on flaring shall be in effect:

38

### Refinery

(A) No. of Covered

Flares

(B) 30

- day Rolling Average Waste Gas Flow Limit (scfd)
(C) Refinery

- Wide , 365-day Rolling Average Waste Gas Flow Limit (scfd) (D) Canton 1 500,000 432 ,500 Catlettsburg 4 250,000 per Flare 1,200,000 Detroit 5 250,000 per Flare 550,000 Garyville 4 1,100,000 consolidated Waste Gas Flow to North and South Ground Flares; 1,000,000 consolidated Waste Gas Flow to North and South Elevated Fla res 1,700,000 Robinson 6 500,000 consolidated Waste Gas Flow to F1, F5, and F6; 500,000 consolidated Waste Gas Flow to F2 and F3 250,000 to F4 1,000,000 Texas City 2 250,000 per Flare 417,500
Each exceedance of the 30 -day rolling avera ge limit or each exceedance of the 365

- day rolling average limit shall constitute one day of violation. An exceedance of either or both of the limits shall not prohibit ongoing refinery operations. 40. Limitation on Flaring : Meaning of “Waste Gas” in Paragra ph 39
. For purposes of the meaning of “Waste Gas” in P aragraph 39, the following shall apply:
a. To the extent that MPC has instrumentation capable of measuring the volumetric flow rate of hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or water (steam) in the Waste Gas, the contribution of all measured flows of any of these elements/compounds may be excluded from the Waste Gas flow rate calculation
. b. Waste Gas f lows during all periods (including but not limited to normal operations and periods of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction, process upsets, relief valve leakages, power losses due to an interruptible power service agreement, and emergencies arising from events within the boundaries of the Covered Refinery), except those described in t he next sentence, shall be included. Flows that could not be prevented through reasonable planning and are in anticipation of or caused by a natural disaster, act of
39

### war or terrorism, or External Power Loss are the only flows that may be excluded from the calculation of flow rate.
c. Except for hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or water (steam) contributions to the flow rate that are excluded by virtue of instrumentation measuring these flows, for any flow that MPC does not include in a computation, MPC shall submit in the semi -annual report due under Paragraph 69, the following: a description of the event that resulted in the exclusion; the date(s) and duration(s) of the flows caused by the event; the estimated VOC and SO 2 

### emissions during the event; whether flows from the event still are anticipated to persist after the period covered by the report, and if so, for how long; and the measures taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the flows including, for future anticipat ed flow, the schedule by which those measures will be implemented. C. Flare Combustion Efficiency 41. Emission Standards and Work Practices Applicable to each Covered Flare upon the Date of Lodging . As set forth in Column F of Appendix 2.1, beginning no lat er than the Date of Lodging for all Covered Flares except for the Detroit Coker Flare (which is not yet in operation), and by no later than June 30, 2013, for the Detroit Coker Flare, MPC shall comply with the following requirements at each Covered Flare:
a. Operation during Emissions Venting . MPC shall operate each Covered Flare at all times when emissions may be vented to it. b. No Visible Emissions . Except for periods of Startup, Shutdown, and/or Malfunction, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare wi th no Visible Emissions. Method 22 in 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix A, shall be used to determine compliance with this standard. However, for purposes of this Consent Decree, Visible Emissions may be determined by either a person certified pursuant to Method 22 or a video camera.
c. Flame Presence . Except for periods of Malfunction of the Flare, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare with a flame present at all times. MPC shall monitor the

40

### presence of the pilot flame using a thermocouple or any other equi valent device to detect the presence of the pilot flame. d. Monitoring According to Applicable Provisions . MPC shall comply with all applicable Subparts of 40 C.F.R. Parts 60, 61, or 63 that state how a particular Covered Flare must be monitored.
e. Good Air Pollution Control Practices . At all times, including during periods of Startup, Shutdown, and/or Malfunction, MPC shall implement good air pollution control practices to minimize emissions from each Covered Flare; provided however, that MPC shall not be in violation of this requirement for any practice that this Consent Decree requires MPC to implement after the Date of Lodging for the period between the Date of Lodging and the implementation date or compliance date (whichever is applicable) for th e particular practice. 42. Exit Velocity . Beginning no later than the dates set forth in Column C of Appendix 2.1, except for the Garyville Ground Flares, and except for periods of Startup, Shutdown, and/or Malfunction, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare wi th an Exit Velocity less than 18.3 m/sec (60 ft/sec) on a one-hour block average; provided however, that:
a. Except for the Garyville Ground Flares, for any Covered Flare that combusts Vent Gas with a Net Heating Value of greater than 1000 BTU/scf, MPC may op erate the Covered Flare with an Exit Velocity equal to or greater than 18.3 m/sec (60 ft/sec) but less than 122 m/sec (400 ft/sec) on a one -hour block average; b. Except for the Garyville Ground Flares, for any Covered Flare that has a maximum permitted Exit Velocity (V max 

### ), MPC may operate the Covered Flare with an Exit Velocity less than V max 

### provided that it also operates this Flare with an Exit Velocity of less than 122 m/sec (400 ft/sec) on a one- hour block average; and
c. Except for periods of Startup, Shutdown, and/or Malfunction, MPC shall operate the Garyville Ground Flares with an Exit Velocity that shall be determined through the testing required pursuant to Paragraph 52.

41

### V max 

### shall be calculated in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(f)(5). The Unobstructed Cross Sectional Area of the Flare Tip shall be calculated consistent with Appendix 1.6. 43. Work Practice Standards for each Covered Flare. By no later than the dates set forth in Column G of Appendix 2.1, utilizing the instrumentation and controls required to be installed pursuant to Paragraphs 18–23, MPC shall install and operate on each Covered Flare an Automatic Control System that shall:
a. A utomate the control of the Supplemental Gas flow rate to the respective Flare; and b. Automate the control of the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate to the respective Flare. 44. Exception to Part of the Work Practice Standard s in Subparagraph 43.b . MPC manually may override the operation of the Automatic Control System required in Subparagraph 43 .b (for control of Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate) if the exception in Paragraph 50 applies , and/or during Startup, Shutdown, or Malfunction of a process unit that feeds the Covered Flare, and/or to achieve the following:
a. Stop Smoke Emissions that are occurring; b. Me et the Net Heating Value requirements of Paragraph 46;
c. Prevent extinguishing the Flare; d. Protect personnel safety; and/or
e. Stop Discontinuous Wake Dominated Flow 45. Operation According to Design . By no later than the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall operate and maintain each Covered Flare in accordance with its design, except if, and only to the extent that, operation and maintenance of the Covered Flare in

42

### conformance with its design conflicts with compliance with one or more of the requirements of this Consent Decree. 46. Net Heating Value Standards for each Covered Flare
. a. Net Heating Value of Vent Gas ( NHV vg 

### ) . Beginning on the Date of Lodging and continuing until the earlier of: (i) termination of this Consent Decree; or (ii) the requirements in 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.18(c)(3)(ii) and 63.11(b)(6)(ii) related to the NHV vg 

### are modified, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare with an NHV vg 

### of greater than or equal to 300 BTU/scf, except as provided in Paragraph 50. b. Net Heating Va lue of Combustion Zone Gas ( NHV cz 

### )
. i. By no later than the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, and except as provided in Paragraph 50 , MPC shall calculate an NHV cz - limit 

### at each Covered Flare no less than every fifteen minutes. Except as provided in Paragraph 50 , MPC shall operate each Covered Flare so as to ensure that the Covered Flare’s NHV cz 

### , on a three -hour rolling average basis, rolled every fifteen minutes, is greater than or equal to its NHV cz - limit 

### on a three-hour rolling average basis, rolled every fifteen minutes. MPC shall utilize the equations and directives set forth in Appendix 1.3, except as provided in Subparagraph 46 .b.ii, to meet the requirements of this Subparagraph 46.b.i. ii. Interim Combustion Efficiency ( CE ) Multiplier s . Between the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1 and June 30, 2017, MPC may use the following Table of CE Multipliers instead of the CE Multipliers in Table 2 of Appendix 1.3 provided that MPC complies with the conditions in Subparagraph 46 .b.iii: Minimum Steam for Covered Flare VOC Vent Gas Concentration A B * Cond. X Cond. Y ≤ 1000 lb/hr ≤ 20.0% 6. 45 4.0 0 .0 ≤ 1000 lb/hr >20.0% 6. 8 5 4.0 0.0 > 1000 lb/hr ≤ 20.0% 6. 45 4.0 0.0 > 1000 lb/hr > 20.0% 6. 8 5 4.0 0.0 *The B Multiplier used depends on the relationship of hydrogen 

### (H 2 

### ) and propylene in the

Vent Gas as follows: Condition X : 3 ≤H 2 % ≤8 and Propylene%≥H 2 % (all percents are volume or mole 

### p ercents) Condition Y : Any condition not meeting the requirements for Condition X 

### .
43

### iii. Conditions for the Use of Interim CE Multipliers . In order to use the Interim CE Multipliers in Subparagraph 46.b.ii, MPC must comply with each of the following: (a) By no later than December 31, 2013, MPC shall install a Minimum Steam Reduction System (“MSRS”) on Covered Flare 84 -F1 at the Robinson Refinery (“Robinson 84- F1”). (b) Between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2014, in order to evaluate emissions, Combustion Efficiency, and the effectiveness of MSRS, MPC shall conduct Passive FTIR testing on Robinson 84-F1. By no later than 45 days prior to the test, MPC shall submit an Emissions and Combustion Efficiency Test Protocol in accordance with the general requirements in Appendix 2.3. The test protocol also shall describe how the testing will evaluate the effectiveness of the MSRS. MPC shall complete the testing within 30 days of commencing the test. (c) By no later than June 30, 2014, MPC shall submit a report that complies with the requirements of Paragraph 53. The report also shall include an evaluation o f the effectiveness of the MSRS. (d) By no later than June 30, 2017, MPC shall submit a report to EPA that evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of MSRS at each Covered Flare that has a minimum steam requirement of greater than 1000 lb/hr. In that report, MPC shall identify each Covered Flare that it shall equip with MSRS, together with a schedule for installation as soon as practicable. iv. Final CE Multipliers
. (a) For those equipped or to be equipped with MSRS
. Between the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1 and the termination of the Decree, MPC shall be entitled to use, in the calculation of a Covered Flare’s NHV cz - limit 

### , the Interim CE Multipliers set forth in Subparagraph 46.b.ii, instead of those in Table 2 of Appendix 1.3, for the Robinson 84-F1 and for each Covered Flare identified in Subparagraph 46.b.iii. (d) , provided that, with respect to those identified in Subparagraph 46.b.iii. (d) , MPC completes the installation of an MSRS in accordance with the proposed schedule.

44

### (b) For those not scheduled to be equipped with MSRS
. Between June 30, 2017, and the termination of this Decree, MPC shall be required to use, in the calculation of a Covered Flare’s NHV cz - limit 

### , the CE Multipliers set forth in Table 2 of Appendix 1.3 fo r all Covered Flares that are not identified in the report due under Subparagraph 46.b.iii. (d) as committed to be equipped with MSRS. 47. S/VG mass 

### and S/VG vol 

### Standards (Total

- Steam

- Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate

- to
Vent

- Gas

- Volumetric

- Flow

- Rate Ratio Standards)
a. I nterim Period . Beginning on the Date of Lodging and continuing until the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, and except as provided in Subparagraph 47.d and Paragraph 50 , MPC shall use best efforts to operate each Covered Flare so as to minimize that Flare’s S/VG mass 

### and/or S/VG vol 

### . b. After Interim Period . By no later than the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, and except as provided in Subparagraph 47.d and Paragraph 50, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare, except the Garyville Gro und Flares, at less than or equal to either: (i) an S/VG mass 

### of 3.0 on a one-hour rolling average, rolled every five minutes; or (ii) an S/VG vol 

### of 2.7 on a one-hour rolling average, rolled every five minutes. For each Covered Flare, MPC shall record both the S/VG mass 

### and the S/VG vol 

### . MPC shall operate the Garyville Ground Flares with an S/ VG mass 

### and/ or an S/VG vol 

### that shall be determined through the testing required pursuant to Paragraph 52.
c. Adjustment at the Texas City Main Flare B ased on Steam Co ntribution Factor
. i. Texas City Main Flare . For purposes of compliance with Subparagraph 47 .b at the Texas City Main Flare, MPC may utilize the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate as Corrected by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare instead of the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate and the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate as Corrected by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas

45

### City Main Flare instead of the Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate
. To calculate the Total Steam Mass and Volumetric Flow Rate s as Corrected by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare , MPC shall utilize Equation 1 in Appendix 2.2 to first calculate the Non-Mixing Total Steam for the Texas City Main Flare . Thereafter, MPC shall use Equations 2–4B of Append ix 2.2 to calculate the Total Steam Mass and Volumetric Flow Rate s as Corrected by the Steam Contribution Factor for the Texas City Main Flare
. ii. Other Covered Flares
. At any time after the Date of Lodging, for any Covered Flare, MPC may submit a req uest to EPA for an adjustment of the Total Steam Mass Flow Rate and Total Steam Volum etric Flow Rate at that Covered Flare based on the Steam Contribution Factor at that Covered Flare. In any such request, MPC must demonstrate and justify the equation it proposes to use to calculate the Non-Mixing Total Steam at the Covered Flare that is the subject of the request. d. Exceptions . Notwithstanding the requirements of Subparagraphs 47 .a and 47.b, MPC is not subject to the emissions standards in those Subparagraphs if the exception in Paragraph 50 applies and/or in order to achieve the following: i. Stop Smoke E missions that are occurring; ii. Meet the Net Heating Value requirements of Paragraph 46; iii. Prevent extinguishing the Flare; and/or iv. Pro tect personnel safety. 48. Minimum Momentum Flux Ratio ( MFR ) for Covered Flares , except the Garyville Ground Flares.
a. The requirements of this Paragraph have no applicability to Ground Flares; therefore, the Garyville Ground Flares are not subject to this Paragraph. All references to “Covered Flares” in this Paragraph exclude the Garyville Ground Flares. b. By no later than the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, for each Covered Flare, MPC shall comply with either Subparagraph 48.c.i or 48 .c .ii, or, for the Detroit

46

### Crude Flare, Subparagraph 48.d . In the first semi -annual report due after the applicable compliance date, MPC shall identify which compliance option it selects for each Covered Flare. MPC may select different alternatives for different f lares. MPC subsequently may change the option it previously had selected for a Covered Flare but only after notifying EPA in a semi -annual report that it intends to make the change 30 days after submission of the report. In the report, MPC shall include the reason for changing the compliance option.
c. MFR Requirements . MFR shall be calculated in accordance with the equations, conversion factors, MFR constants, MFR measured variables, and MFR calculated variables set forth in Appendix 1.5. At eac h Covered Flare except the Detroit Crude Flare (which is subject to Subparagraph 48.d), MPC shall either: i. Maintain a minimum MFR of 0.0030 on a 60- minute rolling average basis, rolled every 5 minutes; or ii. Propose a Flare- specific MFR. MPC shall sub mit such a proposal to EPA for approval. In any such proposal, MPC shall demonstrate to EPA’s satisfaction that at the proposed MFR, Discontinuous Wake Dominated Flow or measured Combustion Efficiency less than 98% will not occur for the Covered Flare tha t is the subject of the request. d. For the Detroit Crude Flare, MPC shall maintain a minimum MFR of 0.00050 on a 60-minute rolling average basis, rolled every 5 minutes.
e. Exceptions to the Applicability of the MFR Requirements
. The requirements of Subparagraphs 48.c and 48.d are not applicable in the following circumstances: i. During any period of Vent Gas flow to the Covered Flare where there are less than 6 consecutive 5

- minute averages of MFR; ii. A t any time that the wind speed at a Covered Refinery is greater than or equal to 35 mph on a 60- minute rolling average basis, rolled every 5 minutes ; and/or iii. If the exception in Paragraph 50 applies.

47

### f. Calculation of MFR “on a 60-minute rolling average basis, rolled every 5 minutes,” when there are more than 5 but less than 12 consecutive 5-minute averages of MFR
. During any period of Vent Gas flow to the Covered Flare when there are more than 5 but less than 12 consecutive 5- minute averages of MFR, the MFR “on a 60- minute rolling average ba sis, rolled every 5 minutes” shall be calculated using the 5- minute average s that are greater than “0” during the period; the 5

- minute averages when MFR is “0” because there is no Vent Gas flow shall not be used in calculating the 60-minute rolling average, rolled every 5 minutes. 49. 98% Combustion Efficiency . By no later than the dates set forth in Column H of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare with a minimum of a 98% Combustion Efficiency at all times when Waste Gases are vented to it. To d emonstrate continuous compliance with the 98% Combustion Efficiency, MPC shall operate each Covered Flare within the range of operating parameters set forth in Paragraphs 46–48. 50. Exception for Instrument Downtime
. A failure to comply with the work practice s or standards in Subparagraphs 43.a, 43.b, 46.a, 46.b, 47.a, 47.b, 48.c.i, 48.c.ii, or 4 8.d shall not constitute a violation of such work practice or standard if the noncompliance results from downtime of instruments or equipment due to the following:
a. Malfunction of an instrument, for an instrument needed to meet the requirement(s); b. Maintenance following instrument Malfunction, for an instrument needed to meet the requirement(s);
c. Scheduled maintenance of an instrument in accordance with the man ufacturer’s recommended schedule, for an instrument needed to meet the requirement(s); and/or d. Quality Assurance/Quality Control activities on an instrument needed to meet the requirement(s).

48

### This exception shall no longer be applicable if the activities in Subparagraphs 50.a–50.d exceed 110 hours in any calendar quarter for any instrument. The calculation of instrument downtime shall be made in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.13(h)(2) and Paragraph VI of Appendix 1.10. 51. Inapplicability of Paragraphs 46–49 . The requirements of Paragraphs 46–49 are not applicable to any Covered Flare when the only gas or gases being vented to the Covered Flare is/are Pilot Gas and/or Purge Gas. 52. Emissions and Combustion Efficiency Testing of the Garyville Ground Flares: Requirements . By no later than September 30, 2012, MPC shall conduct testing that evaluates the emissions and Combustion Efficiency of the Garyville Ground Flares. The testing shall be conducted in accordance with the protocol set forth in Appendix 2.4. MPC shall complete the testing within 30 days of commencing the test. 53. Emission s and Combustion Efficiency Testing at the Robinson Flare 84- F1 and Garyville Ground Flares: Reporting . By no later than March 31, 2013, for the Garyville Ground Flares , and June 30, 2014, for Robinson 84-F1, MPC shall submit a report to EPA for approval that sets forth the following:
a. The detailed results of the testing done that includes minute by minute electronic data in Excel format for all measurements and process data and is not inconsistent with the requirements of Appendix 2.5; b. A detailed description of the extent to which the operating parameters, including but not limited to Vent Gas composition, NHV cz 

### , S/VG mass 

### , and S/VG vol 

### , affect Combustion Efficiency, and, for the Garyville Ground Flares, a detailed description of how exit velocity affects Combustion Efficiency;
c. A detailed description of the range of the NHV cz 

### and S/VG mass 

### and /or S/VG vol 

### that Robinson Flare 84-F1 and the Garyville Ground Flares must be operated at, taking into consideration variability in Vent Gas flow rate, Vent Gas composition, and Vent Gas exit velocity; for the Garyville Ground Flares, a demonstration that 98% Combustion Efficiency will be achieved at maximum design exit velocity for t he proposed NHV cz 

### ; and

49

### d. The proposed “ A” Combustion Efficiency Multiplier for calculating the NHV cz - limit 

### and the maximum S/VG mass 

### and/or S/VG vol 

### at which MPC proposes to operate Robinson Flare 84-F1 and the Garyville Ground Flares in order to achieve a Combustion Efficiency of no less than 98% on a continuous basis. 54. EPA Response to Testing Reports . EPA shall review the reports required in Paragraph 53 and establish the “A” Combustion Efficiency Multiplier for calculating the NHV cz - limit 

### and the maximum S/VG mass 

### and/or S/VG vol 

### for each of these Flares. These limits will be based on the results of the testing and a consideration of emissions impacts, and will be set at a point where the limits ensure that a Combustion Efficiency of at least 98% is continu ously achieved with a reasonable certainty of compliance. Disputes arising under this Paragraph shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Decree. 55. Recordkeeping: Timing and Substance
. MPC shall comply with the followi ng recordkeeping requirements:
a. By no later than three months after the dates set forth in Column C of Appendix 2.1, MPC shall calculate and record, in accordance with the recording and averaging times required in Paragraph 27, each of the following pa rameters: i. Total Steam Volumetric Flow Rate (in scfm) and Total Steam Mass Flow Rate (in lb/hr) ii. Vent Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (in scfm) and Total Steam Mass Flow Rate (in lb/hr) iii. S/VG mass 

### (in lb steam/lb Vent Gas) iv. S/VG vol 

### (in s cfm steam/scfm Vent Gas)
v. NHV vg 

### (in BTU/scf) vi. NHV cz 

### (in BTU/scf) vii. NHV cz - limit 

### (in BTU/scf)

50

### b. By no later than six months after the dates set forth in Column C of Appendix 2.1, commencing if and when the excepted activities in Subpar agraphs 28.a–28.d for any instrument subject to Paragraph 28 exceed 110 hours in any calendar quarter, MPC shall record the duration of the deviation, an explanation of the cause(s) of the deviation, and a description of the corrective action(s) that MPC took.
c. By no later than the dates set forth in Column G of Appendix 2.1 for compliance with the work practice standards in Paragraph 43 : (i) MPC shall record each time it manually overrides its Automatic Control System, including the date, time, duration, reason for the override, and corrective actions that MPC took; and (ii) where the reason for the override was to stop Visible Emissions that were occurring, and where MPC has been required pursuant to Paragraph 24 to install a video camera, MPC shall i nclude a copy of the digital video record (with a time stamp) of the Covered Flare during the period of the manual override. d. By no later than the dates required in Column F of Appendix 2.1 for compliance with the standards in Paragraph 41, and by no later than the dates required in Column H of Appendix 2.1 for compliance with the emissions standards in Paragraphs 46–49 , at any time that MPC deviates from those standards, MPC shall record the duration of the deviation, an explanation of the cause(s) of the deviation, and a description of the corrective action(s) that MPC took.

51

### D. Miscellaneous 56. Temporary

- Use Flares
. a. Applicability . The provisions of this Paragraph shall apply to Temporary

- Use Flares. b. Distinction between Planned and Unplanned O utages of Covered Flares
. For purposes of this Paragraph, a “planned” outage of a Covered Flare shall mean an outage that is scheduled 30 days or more in advance of the outage. An “unplanned” outage is an outage that either is scheduled less than 30 days in advance or is unscheduled.
c. 504 hours or less . For any planned or unplanned outage of a Covered Flare that MPC knows or reasonably anticipates will result in 504 hours or less of downtime on a rolling 1095-day average period, MPC shall make good f aith efforts to ensure that the Temporary

- Use Flare that replaces the Covered Flare complies with all of the requirements of this Consent Decree that are applicable to the Covered Flare that the Temporary

- Use Flare replaces. d. More than 504 hours. i. Pl anned . For any planned outage of a Covered Flare that MPC knows or reasonably can anticipate will last 504 hours or more on a rolling 1095- day average period, MPC shall ensure that the T emporary - Use F lare complies with all of the requirements of this Cons ent Decree related to the Covered Flare that it replaces as of the date that the Temporary- Use F lare is placed into service. ii. Unplanned . For any unplanned outage of a Covered Flare that, in advance of the outage, MPC cannot reasonably anticipate will last longer than 504 hours, MPC shall ensure that the T emporary - Use F lare complies with all of the requirements of this Consent Decree related to the Covered Flare that it replaces by no later than 30 days after the date that MPC knows or reasonably should have known that the outage will last 504 hours or more.

52

### e. Recordkeeping . MPC shall keep records sufficient to document compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph any time it uses a T emporary - Use F lare. 57. Miscellaneous . Whenever this Consent De cree requires compliance within a certain number of “months” after a triggering event, the compliance obligation commences on the anniversary of the numerical date that triggers the obligation. For example, if compliance is required by no later than three months after the submission of a particular document, and if the document is submitted on March 23, 2012, the compliance obligation commences on June 23, 2012. E. NSPS Subpart A, J, and Ja Applicability 58. NSPS Subparts A and J . As of the Date of Lodging, e ach Covered Flare shall continue to be an “affected facility” within the meaning of Subparts A and J of 40 C.F.R. Part 60; however, except as set forth in Subparagraph 59.a, each Covered Flare shall comply with the requirements of Subparts A and J, including all monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and operating requirements, by no later than the dates in Column J of Appendix 2.1. 59. NSPS Subpart s A and Ja . Each Covered Flare shall be an “affected facility” within the meaning of Subparts A and Ja of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, and shall comply with the requirements of Subparts A and Ja, including all monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and operating requirements, by the later of: (i) the dates in Column J of Appendix 2.1; or (ii) the date(s) by which a “modified” f lare (within the meaning of Subpart Ja) must comply with the requirements of Subpart Ja.
a. To the extent that the later of the two possible dates is “the dates in Column J of Appendix 2.1,” then Subpart Ja, and not Subpart J, is the applicable Subpart on and after the dates in Column J of Appendix 2.1. b. To the extent that the later of the two possible dates is “the earliest date by which a ‘ modified ’ flare (within the meaning of Subpart Ja) must comply

53

### with the requirements of Subpart Ja,” then Subpart J is applicable between the dates in Column J of Appendix 2.1 and the applicable date (s) of Subpart Ja. Thereafter, only Subpart Ja is applicable.
c. On and after the date (s) that each Covered Flare is subject to Subpart Ja, Subpart J no longer is applic able to that Covered Flare. F. Incorporation of Consent Decree Requirements into Federally Enforceable Permits 60. Permits Needed to Meet Compliance Obligations . If any compliance obligation under th is Section V requires MPC to obtain a federal, state, or lo cal permit or approval, MPC shall submit timely and complete applications and take all other actions necessary to obtain all such permits or approvals. MPC may seek relief under the provisions of Section X of this Decree (Force Majeure) for any delay in t he performance of any such obligation resulting from a failure to obtain, or a delay in obtaining, any permit or approval required to fulfill such obligation, if MPC has submitted timely and complete applications and has taken all other actions necessary t o obtain all such permits or approvals. 61. Permits to Ensure Survival of Consent Decree Limits and Standards after Termination of Consent Decree
. a. Prior to termination of this Consent Decree, for those states that do not have a consolidated Title V construction and operating permit program, MPC shall submit complete applications to applicable state/local agenc ies to incorporate the limits and standards listed in Subparagraph 61.b into non- Title V, federally enforceable permits that will survive termination of this Consent Decree. Prior to termination of this Consent Decree, for those states that have a consolidated Title V construction and operating permit program, MPC shall submit to the applicable state/local agencies, appropriate applications, amendment s and/or supplements to incorporate as “ applicable requirements ” the limits and standards listed in Subparagraph 61.b to ensure that th ese limits and standards survive termination of this Consent Decree.

54

### b. The limits and standards imposed by the followi ng Paragraphs of this Consent Decree shall survive termination: 17–23, 24 (if required), 26–28, 39–40, 41–45, 46.b.i, 46.b.iv, 47.b–d, 48.c–f, 49–51, 55, 56.c (if applicable), 56.d (if applicable), and 58–59. At the time of submission of the documents necessary to ensure survival of the limits and standards identified in this Subparagraph, MPC may elect, at any Covered Flare, to cease recording both S/VG mass 

### and S/VG vol 

### and instead may identify the S/VG basis ( i.e. , volume or mass) that it elects to comply with going forward and record S/VG only on that basis. 62. Modifications to Title V Operating Permits . Prior to termination of this Consent Decree, MPC shall submit complete applications to applicable state/local agencies to modify , amend, or revise the Title V permit of each Covered Refinery to incorporate the limits and standards identified in the preceding Paragraph in the Title V p ermits. The Parties agree that the incorporation of these emission limits and standards into Title V Permits shall be done in accordance with applicable state o r local Title V rules. The Parties agree that the incorporation may be by “amendment” under 40 C.F.R. § 70.7(d) and analogous state Title V rules, where allowed by state law.

55

### VI. EMISSION CREDIT GENERATION 63. Prohibitio ns . a. Definition . “CD Emissions Reductions” shall mean any NO x 

### , SO 2 

### , H 2 

### S, PM, PM TOTAL 

### , PM 10 

### , PM 2.5 

### , VOC, or CO emissions reductions that result from any projects conducted or controls used to comply with this Consent Decree. b. Prohibitions
. i. MPC s hall neither generate n or use any CD Emissions Reductions as netting reductions , as emission s offsets , or in determining whether a project is “major” in any PSD, major non- attainment, and/or minor N ew So urce R ev iew permit or permit proceeding; ii. A ny CD Emissions Reductions that result from the Waste Gas minimization requirements of Paragraphs 30–37 may not be used as netting reductions, as emissions offsets, or in determining whether a project is “major” in any PSD, major non

- attainment and/or minor New Source Review permit or permit proceeding even if those Reductions result in emissions lower than the allowable level under the flaring limitations in Paragraph 39. ii i. Except as provided in Subp aragraph 64.b, MPC shall not apply for, obtain, trade, or s ell any emission reduction credits that result from CD Emissions Reductions. 64. Outside the Scope of the Prohibition . Nothing in this Section is intended to prohibit MPC from seeking to n or prohibit an applicable state agency from denying MPC’s ability to :
a. U se or generate netting reductions or emission reduction credits for refinery units that are not subject to an emission limitation pursuant to this Consent Decree; b. U se CD Emission s Reductions for a Covered Refinery’s compliance with any rules or reg ulations designed to address regional haze or the non- attainment status of any area (excluding PSD and Non

- Attainment New Source Review rules , but including, for example, RACT rules ) that apply to the Covered Refinery; provided, however, that MPC shall not be allowed to trade or s ell any CD Emissions Reductions.

56

### VII. MITIGATION PROJECT 65. By no later than September 30, 2013 , MPC shall complete implementation and commence operation of the Environmental Mitigation Project described in Paragraph 66 for the purpose of reducing emissions of VOCs and benzene from the Detroit Refinery. 66. MPC shall install controls that conform to the requirements of the Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP, 40 C.F.R. Part 61, Subpart FF, on the Detroit Refinery’s sludge handling facility that, as currently configured, is depicted as the “Existing System” in Appendix 2.6.
a. MPC shall undertake the following: i. Sump Pit and Pump Adjacent to Tank 29- T12 . MPC shall replace the existing sump pit and pump with hard-piping and strainers that have no openings to the atmosphere and that will enable vacuum trucks to discharge directly into Tank 29-T12. ii
. Tank 29- T12 . MPC shall undertake all necessary modifications to Tank 29-T12 to make it conform to the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 61.343 and MPC shall thereafter operate and maintain Tank 29-T12 in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.343. iii
. Centrifuges 1 and 2 . Centrifuges 1 and 2 each are comprised of a mix tank and a centrifuge mounted on top of a screw conveyor. (a) Mix Tanks . MPC shall replace the existing mix tanks with new tanks that are designed, installed, operated, and maintained to conform to the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 61.343. (b) Centrifuges with Screw Conveyors . MPC shall undertake all necessary modifications to the centrifuges with screw conveyors to make them conform to 40 C.F.R. § 61.343 and MPC shall thereafter operate and maintain the centrifuges with screw conveyors in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.343. iv
. Container(s) for Centrifuge Solids . MPC shall replace the existing uncontrolled, three-sided box that centrifuge solids currently are conveyed into with one or more containers that are designed, installed, operated and maintained in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.345.

57

### v. Frac Tank . MPC shall undertake all necessary modifications to the Frac Tank to make it conform to the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 61.343 and MPC shall thereafter operate and maintain the Frac Tank in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.343. vi. Conveying M aterial between the Waste Management Unit s . All areas for conveyance of materials between the strainers and the F rac T ank shall be hard -piped with no openings to the atmosphere. vii. Closed Vent System and Control Device . MPC shall eliminate emissions to the atmosphere from Tank 29-T12, the ne w centrifuge mixing tanks, the existing centrifuges and screw conveyors, the new container(s) that will handle centrifuged solids, and the existing frac tank by designing, installing, operating and maintaining a closed vent system in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.349(a)(1). MPC shall route all vapors from this closed vent system to a control device that is designed, installed, operated, and maintained in conformance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.349(a)(2). The closed vent system and control device shall conform t o all requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 61.349. b. The modifications described in Subp aragraph 66.a and labeled as “Modifications” on the second schematic of Appendix 2.6 represent MPC’s design plans as of the Date of Lodging but are not the final design. If, by no later than September 30, 2013, MPC install s, on all waste management units that handle the Detroit Refinery’s sludge, controls that fully conform to the requirements of the Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP, 40 C.F.R. Part 61, Subpart FF, then MPC may make changes to the modifications described herein and depicted on the second schematic in Appendix 2.6 without notifying EPA
. MPC shall identify any such changes in the report s due under Paragraph 68 of this Section. MPC may not make any changes to the modifications described herein and in Appendix 2.6 that result in anything less than full control of the Detroit Refinery’s sludge handling facility in conformance with the Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP , 40 C.F.R. Part 61, Subpart FF , unless such change s are consented to by the United States
.

58

### 67. By signing this Consent Decree, MPC certifies that it is not required to perform or develop this Environmental Mitigation Project by any federal, state, or local law or regulation and is not required to perform or develop this Project by agreement, grant, or as injunctive relief awarded in any other action in any forum; that this Project is not one that MPC was planning or intending to construct, perform, or implement other than in settlement of the claims resolved by this Decree; and that MPC will not receive any reimbursement for any portion of the costs of this Project from any other person. 68. Environmental Mitigation Project Progress and Completion Reports . MPC shall include in each report for the Detroit Refinery required under Paragraph 69, a status update on the Environmental Mitigation Project required by this Section. In addition, the report for the Detroit Refinery required by Paragraph 69 for the period in which the Project is completed shall contain the fo llowing information:
a. A detailed description of the Project as implemented; b. A description of any problems encountered in completing the Project and the solutions thereto;
c. A description of the environmental and public health benefits resulting fr om implementation of the Project (with a quantification of the benefits and an estimate of the pollutant reductions); and d. A certification that the Project has been fully implemented pursuant to the provisions of this Decree. V II I. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 69. Semi -Annual Reports . On the dates and for the time periods set forth in Paragraph 72, MPC shall submit to EPA in the manner set forth in Section XV (Notices) the following information:

59

### a. A progress report on the implementation of the requirements in Section V of this Decree (Compliance Requirements) at the Covered Refinery; b. A description of any problems anticipated with respect to meeting the requirements of Section V at the Covered Refinery;
c. For the semi

- annual report of the Detroit Refinery, a description of the status of the Mitigation Project in Section VII of this Decree (Mitigation Project) ; d. Monitoring equipment/instrument downtime, override of Automatic Control System (“ASC”), and exceedances of emission standards, as described in Paragraph 70;
e. For the semi -annual report due on July 31 of each year, annual emissions data, as described in Paragraph 71; f. Any addition al matter s required by any other Paragraph of this Consent Decree to be submitted in the semi-annual report; and g. Any additional matters that MPC believes should be brought to the attention of EPA. 70. Monitoring Instrument /Equipment Downtime; Override of ACS; and Emission s Exceedances . On and after the date of applicability of any work practice or standard , MPC sh all provide a summary of the following , per Covered Flare per calendar quarter (hours shall be rounded to the nearest tenth):
a. Monitoring Instrument/Equipment Downtime . The total number of hours of downtime of each monitoring instrument/ equipment requir ed pursuant to Paragraphs 18–20, 22–23, and , if applicable, 24, expressed as both an absolute number and a percentage of time the Covered Flare that the instrument/equipment monitors is available for operation ; b. Monitoring Instrument/Equipment Downtime . If the total number of hours of downtime of any monitoring instrument/ equipment required pursuant to Paragraphs 18 –20, 22–23, and , if applicable, 24 exceeds 110 hours in any calendar quarter , an identification of the periods of downtime by date , time, ca use (including Malfunction or maintenance), and, if the cause is asserted to be a M alfunction, the corrective action taken ;
c. Override of Automatic Control System . The total number of hours in which MPC overrode the ACS required in Paragraph 43 , expressed both

60

### an absolute number of hours and a percentage of time the Covered Flare was available for operation ; provided however, that for any hour identified, the report shall describe either or both of the following : (i) if the reason for the override was one of the exceptions identified in Paragraph 44 , a statement of which exception; or (ii) if the total number of hours in which the ACS was overrode was less than 110 hours and was caused by one or more of the exceptions identified in Paragraph 50, a statement to that effect ; d. Override of Automatic Control System . If the reason for the override was not one of the exceptions set forth in Paragraph 44 or i f the total number of hours in which the ACS was overrode exceeds 110 hours in any calendar quarter , a n identification of the periods of override by the date, time, duration, reason for the override, and corrective actions taken;
e. Inapplicability of Emissions Standards
. The total number of hours in which the requirements of Paragraph s 46–49 were not applicable because the only gas or gases being vented was/were Pilot Gas and/or Purge Gas, expressed as both an absolute number of hours and a percentage of time the Covered Flare was available for operation; for purposes of Subparagraphs 70.f. and 70.g, all remaining hours shall be termed “Hours of Applicability”; f. Exceedances of Emissions Standards . During the Hours of Applicability, the total number of hours of exceedances of the emissions standards in Subp aragraphs 46.b, 47.b, 48.c, 48.d, and 49, expressed as both an absolute number of hours and a percentage of time the Covered Flare was available for operation; provided however, that if the exceedance of these standards was less than 110 hours in the calendar quarter and was due to one or more of the exception s set forth in Paragraph 50, the report shall so note; g. Exceedances of Emissions Standards . During the Hours of Applicability, i f the exceedance of the emissions standards in Subp aragraphs 4 6.b, 47.b, 48.c, 48.d, or 49 was not due to one of th e exceptions in Paragraph 50, or if the exceedance was due to one or more of the exceptions in Paragraph 50 but the total number of hours caused by the exceptions in Paragraph 50 was greater than 110, an identification of each averaging period that exceede d the standard, by time and date; the cause of the exceedance (including Startup, Shutdown, maintenance, or Malfunction), and if the cause is asserted to be a Malfunction, an explanation and any corrective actions taken; and

61

### h. Flaring Limitations Exceeda nces . i. For any Waste Gas flows that are excluded from the calculation of flow rate because they are asserted to be based on one or more of the excludible events identified in Subp aragraph 40.b, the information required in Subp aragraph 40.c; ii. An iden tification of each calendar day in which the limitations on flaring set forth in Paragraph 39 were violated; i ii. T he cause of the exceedance; iv. If the cause is asserted to be a Malfunction, an explanation and any corrective actions taken ;
v. A quanti fication of the total excess VOC and SO 2 

### emissions calculated pursuant to Appendix 1.13 , as well as the calculations that support that quantification ; and vi. The information required in Paragraph 80. 71. Emissions Data
. In the semi -annual report that is submitted on July 31 of each year, MPC shall provide, for each Covered Flare, for the prior calendar year, the amount of emissions of the following compounds (in tons per year): VOCs, SO 2 

### , H 2 

### S, CO 2 

### , methane, and ethane. 72. Due Dates . The first compliance statu s report shall be due thirty- one days after the first full half

- year after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree ( i.e., either: (i) January 31 of the year after the Effective Date, if the Effective Date is between January 1 and June 30 of the preceding year; or (ii) July 31 of the year after the Effective Date, if the Effective Date is between July 1 and December 31). The initial report shall cover the period between the Effective Date and the first full half year after the Effective Date (a “half year” runs between January 1 and June 30 and between July 1 and December 31). Until termination of this Decree, each subsequent report will be due on the same date in the following year and shall cover the prior two half years ( i.e. , either January 1 to Decem ber 31 or July 1 to June 30 ).

62

### 73. Each report submitted under this Consent Decree shall be signed by the Covered Refinery Division Manager (or his/her designee), the person responsible for environmental management at the applicable Covered Refinery , or by a person responsible for overseeing implementation of this Consent Decree across MPC, and shall include the following certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accord ance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 74. The reporting requirements of this Consent Decree do not relieve MPC of any reporting obligations required by the CAA or implementing regulations, or by a ny other federal, state, or local law, regulation, permit, or other requirement. 75. Any information provided pursuant to this Consent Decree may be used by the United States in any proceeding to enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree and as otherwise permitted by law. IX. STIPULATED PENALTIES 76. Failure to Pay Civil Penalty . If MPC fails to pay any portion of the civil penalty required to be paid under Section IV of this Decree (Civil Penalty) when due, MPC shall pay a stipulated penalty of $ 2500 per day for each day that the payment is late. Late payment of the civil penalty and any accrued stipulated penalties shall be made in accordance with Paragraph 13. 77. Failure to Meet all Other Consent Decree Obligations
. MPC shall be liable for stipulated penalties to the United States for violations of this Consent Decree as specified below

63

### unless excused under Section IX of this Decree (Force Majeure). For those provisions where a stipulated penalty of either a fixed amount or 1.2 times the economic benefit of delayed

compliance is available, the decision of which alternative to seek rests exclusively within the discretion of the United States.

Violation Stipulated Penalty 77.a. Violation of Paragraph 16. Failure to timely submit a report (¶ 16) that c onforms to the requirements of that Paragraph Period of delay or noncompliance Days 1–30 Days 31 –60 Days 6 1 and later Penalty per day $ 300 $ 400 $ 500 77.b. Violation of Paragraph 30, 31, or 32. Failure to timely submit a plan (¶¶ 30, 31, or 32) that conforms to the requirements of the respective Paragraph Period of delay or noncompliance Days 1–30 Days 31–60 Days 6 1 and later Penalty per day $ 500 $ 750 $ 1000 77.c. Violation of Paragraph 17, 18, 19, Period of delay or Penalty per day 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 (if and when noncompliance, per monitoring required), 26, or 27 . Failure to timely per monitoring system system install the equipment and monitoring systems required by Pa ragraphs 18–24 Days 1–30 $ 750 in accordance with the respective, Days 31 –60 $ 1250 applicable technical specifications in Days 6 1 and later $ 2000 or an amount those Paragraphs, Paragraph 27, and equal to 1.2 times Appendix 1.10 (except for the the economic requirements of Appendix 1.10 found in benefit of delayed Subparagraphs I.g, III.e, IV, V.B, or compliance, VII.a: those are QA/QC requirements whichever is greater covered in Subparagraph 77.d below) 77.d. Violation of the QA/QC requirements in Appendix 1.10 . Failure to comply with the QA/QC requirements in Appendix 1.10 at Su bparagraphs I.g, III.e, IV, V.B, and VII.a Violation of a : Daily requirement Quarterly requirement Annual requirement Penalty $ 100 $ 200 per day late $ 500 per day late

64

### 77.e. Violation of Paragr aph 28 . After Per monitoring system, Penalty per hour the dates in Column H of Appendix 2.1, number of hours per per monitoring except for 110 hours per calendar calendar quarter of system quarter, failure to operate the monitoring downtime over 110 systems in Paragraphs 18–20, 22–23, or, if and when applicable, 24; provided 0.25–50.0 $ 250 however, that MPC shall not be liable 50.25–100.0 $ 500 for a stip ulated penalty for violation of Over 100.0 $ 1000 Paragraph 28 if, during the period of instrument downtime, the only gas(es) being sent to the Covered Flare in question is/are Purge Gas and/or Pilot Gas 77.f. Violation of Paragraph 29 . Failure to timely decommission the Canton South Flare or the Catlettsburg Pitch Flare in conformance with the requirements of Paragraph 29 Period of delay or noncompliance per Flare Days 1–30 Days 31 –60 Days 6 1 and later Penalty per day per Flare $ 1000 $ 2500 $ 5000 77.g. Violation of Paragraph 35
. Period of delay or Penalty per day Failure to timely develop a report that noncompliance conforms to the requirements in Subparagraph 35.a; or failure to keep it Days 1 – 30 $ 800 as an internal record; or failure to timely Days 31 – 60 $ 1,600 submit a summary of the flaring incident Days 6 1 and later $ 3,000 reports that conforms to the requirements in Subparagraph 35.b 77.h. Violation of Paragraph 37
. Period of delay or Penalty per day Failure to complete any corrective noncompliance action under Paragraph 37 in accordance with the schedule for corrective action Days 1 – 30 $ 1,000 ag reed to by MPC or imposed on MPC Days 31 – 60 $ 2,000 pursuant to the dispute resolution Days 6 1 and later $ 5,000 provisions of this Decree (with any such extensions thereto as to which EPA and MPC may agree in writing)

65

### 77.i. Violation of Paragraph 39, Column C. Failure to comply with the 30- day rolling average limit on flaring Pollutant Penalty per day per ton SO 2 

### $ 100 VOC in attainment area $ 200 VOC in nonattainment area $ 300 The amount of excess emissions during the event(s) which precipitate(s) the exceedance(s) of the 30

- day rolling average limit is not the sole basis for calculating the stipulated penalty due. Instead, each day on which the 30- day rolling average limit is violated —which violations most likely continue even though the precipitating event and the excess emissions do not — counts as a separate day. MPC shall comply with Appendix 1.13 to calculate the stipulated penalties resulting from violating the flaring limitation in Column C of Paragraph 39.

77.j. Violation of P aragraph 39, Column D. Failure to comply with the refinery -wide 365- day rolling average limit on flaring Pollutant Penalty per day per ton SO 2 

### $ 10 VOC in attainment area $ 20 VOC in nonattainment area $ 30 The amount of excess emissions during the event(s) which precipitate(s) the exceedance(s) of the 365

- day rolling average limit is not the so le basis for calculating the stipulated penalty due. Instead, each day on which the 365- day rolling average limit is violated —which violations most likely continue even though the precipitating event and the excess emissions do not— counts as a separate da y. MPC shall comply with Appendix 1.13 to calculate the stipulated penalties resulting from violating the flaring limitation in Column D of Paragraph 39. 77.k. Violation of Paragraph 43
. Penalty per Covered Flare per day: $500 Failure to timely install and operate, by the dates in Column G of Appendix 2.1, the Automatic Control System requirements of Paragraph 43

66

### 77.l. Violation of Subparagraph 46.b. For each Covered Flare, failure to comply with the Net Heating Value in the Combustion Zone Gas (“NHV cz 

### ”) On a per Covered Flare Penalty per hour basis, hours per calendar or fraction thereof quarter in noncompliance per Covered Flare Hours 0.25–50.0 $ 25 Hours 50.25–100.0 $ 75 Hours over 100.0 $ 150 standard in Subparagraph 46.b. For purposes of calculating the number of hours of noncompliance with the NHV cz 

### standard, all 15- minute periods of violation shall be added together to determine the total. 77
. m . Violation of Subparagraph 47.a. Between the Date of Lodging and the compliance dates in Column H of Appendix 2.1, f ailure to use best efforts to minimize the S/VG ratio at each Covered Flare; provided, however, that MPC shall not be liable for a stipulated penalty fo r violation of Subparagraph 47.a if, at the Covered Flare in question, MPC can demonstrate that it is complying with the requirements of Subparagraph 46.b during the period of applicability of this stipulated penalty. Penalty per Covered Flare per day or f raction thereof: $1500

77.n. Violation of Subparagraph 48.c or 48.d. Failure to comply with the applicable MFR standard Flare Tip Size (inches) Penalty per hour or fraction thereof 1.0–24.0 $ 50 24.1–48.0 $ 75 Over 48.0 $ 175 For purposes of calculating the number of hours of noncompliance with the MFR limit, all 5- minute periods of violation shall be added together to determine the total
. 77.o. Violation of Paragraph 52 . Failure to timely conduct the testing set forth in Paragraph 52 in accordance with the protocol For each flare test, period of delay or Penalty per day noncompliance Days 1–30 $ 250 Days 31 –60 $ 500 Days 6 1 and later $ 1000

67

### 77.p. Violation of Paragraph 53
. For each flare test, Penalty per day Failure to timely submit a test report that period of delay or conforms to the requirements of noncompliance Paragraph 53 Days 1–30 $ 200 Days 31 –60 $ 300 Days 6 1 and later $ 400 77.q. Violation of Paragraph 55
. $100 per day Failure to record any information required to be recorded pursuant to Subparagraphs 55.a, b, c, or d 77.r. Violation of Subp aragraph 56.d . Failure to ensure that a Temporary

- Use Flare that falls under the conditions of Subparagraph 56.d.i or 56.d.ii complies with the requirements of those Subparagraphs Number of days Temporary

- Use Flare Penalty per day did not comply Days 1 –7 $ 1000 Days 8 –15 $ 2500 Days 16 and later $ 5000

77.s. Violati on of Paragraph 58 or 59 . Failure to comply with the H 2 

### S emission limit at a Covered Flare after that Covered Flare is required to comply with 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J or 40 On a per Covered Flare Penalty per hour pe rbasis, hours (on a threehour rolling average Covered Flare basis) per calendar quarter in noncompliance Hours 1–50.0 $ 50 Hours 51–100.0 $ 100 Hours over 100.0 $ 200 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart Ja For purposes of calculating the number of hours of noncompliance with the H 2 

### S limit, all one -hour periods of violation shall be added together to determine the total. The averaging period for this standard is a three-hour rolling average.
78. Waiver of Payme nt . The United States may, in its unreviewable discretion, reduce or waive payment of stipulated penalties otherwise due to it under this Consent Decree. 79. Demand for Stipulated Penalties (except for Stipulated Penalties Under Subparagraph 77.i or 77.j) . E xcept for demands under Subparagraph 77.i or 77.j for violations of the flaring limitations in Paragraph 39 , a written demand for the payment of stipulated penalties

68

### will identify the particular violation(s) to which the stipulated penalty relates; the sti pulated penalty amount (as can be best estimated) that the United States is demanding for each violation ; the calculation method underlying the demand; and the grounds upon which the demand is based. Prior to issuing a written demand for stipulated penalt ies, the United States may, in its unreviewable discretion, contact MPC for informal discussion of matters that the United States believes may merit stipulated penalties. 80. Stipulate d Penalties under Subparagraph 77.i. or 77.j
. a. If MPC violate s any of the flaring limitations in Columns C or D of Paragraph 39, MPC shall provide in the semi-annual report due under Section VIII of this Decree (Reporting Requirements ) for the period in which the violation(s) first commenced , the information required in Subparagraph 70.h. If, as of the last day that is covered by the semi -annual report: i. T he event(s) precipitating the violation(s) has(have) not ceased, MPC also shall identify any corrective measures that it took and is taking to limit the duration of the eve nt(s) and an estimate of the expected duration of the event(s) and the violation(s); ii. T he event precipitating the violation(s) has(have) ceased but the violation(s) has(have) not ceased because of the averaging periods involved, MPC also shall provide an estimate of the expected duration of the violation (s ); or iii. Both the event precipitating the violation(s) and the violations has(have) ceased, MPC also shall provide a calculation of the amount of stipulated penalties due. b. If Subparagraph 80.a.i or 80 .a.ii applies, in the first semi -annual report in which both the event precipitating the violation(s) and the violations has(have) ceased, MPC shall provide a calculation of the amount of stipulated penalties due.

69

### c. After receipt of a semi -annual report that provides a calculation of the amount of stipulated penalties due for violation of the flaring limitations in Columns C or D of Paragraph 39 , the United States may issue a written demand for stipulated penalties. Prior to issuing a written demand, the United States may, in its unreviewable discretion, contact MPC for informal discussion of the matter. 81. Stipulated Penaltie s = Accrua l . Stipulated penalties will begin to accrue on the day after performance is due or the day a violation occurs, whichever is applicable, and, except as provided in Paragraph 84, shall continue to accrue until performance is satisfactorily completed or the violation ceases
. Stipulated penalties shall accrue simultaneously for separate violations of this Consent Decr ee. 82. Stipulated Penalties Payment Due Date . S tipulated penalties shall be paid no later than sixty (60) days after receipt of a written demand by the United States unless the demand is disputed through compliance with the requirements of the dispute resolution provisions of this Decree. 83. Manner of Payment of Stipulated Penalties . Stipulated penalties owing to the United States of under $10,000 shall be paid by check and made payable to A U.S. Department of Justice, @ referencing DOJ Number 90-5-2-1-09915 and USAO File Number 2011V01341, and delivered to the U.S. Attorney = s Office in the Eastern District of Michigan , 211 W. Fort St., Suite 2100, Detroit, MI 48226. Stipulated penalties owing to the United States of $10,000 or
more shall be paid in the manner s et forth in Section IV of this Decree (Civil Penalty). All transmittal correspondence shall state that the payment is for stipulated penalties, shall identify the violations to which the payment relates, and shall include the same identifying information required by Paragraph 13.

70

### 84. Disputes over Stipulated Penalties . By no later than 60 days after receiving a demand for stipulated penalties, MPC may dispute liability for any or all stipulated penalties demanded by invoking the dispute resolution procedures of Section XI of this Decree (Dispute Resolution). In the event of a dispute over stipulated penalties, stipulated penalties shall not accrue commencing on the later of either: (i) the date that, during dispute resolution under Section XI , the United States and MPC agree upon; or (ii) the date that MPC files a motion with the Court under Paragraph 98 ; p rovided however, that in order for stipulated penalties to cease accruing pursuant to either (i) or (ii), MPC must place the disputed amount in an interest- bearing commercial escrow account. If the dispute thereafter is resolved in MPC’s favor, the escrowed amount plus accrued interest will be returned to MPC; otherwise, the United States will be entitled to the amount determined by the Court to be due, plus interest that h as accrued on such amount in the escrow account. 85. No amount of the stipulated penalties paid by MPC shall be used to reduce its federal tax obligations. 86. Subject to the provisions of Section XIII of this Decree (Effect of Settlement/Reservati on of Rights), the stipulated penalties provided for in this Decree shall be in addition to any other rights, remedies, or sanctions available to the United States for a violation of this Consent Decree or applicable law. In addition to injunctive relief or stipulated penalties, the United States may seek mitigating emissions reductions equal to or greater than the excess amounts emitted if the violations result in excess emissions. MPC reserves the right to oppose the United States’ request for mitigatin g emission reductions. MPC shall be allowed a credit, for any stipulated penalties paid, against any statutory penalties imposed for such violation.

71

### X. FORCE MAJEURE 87. “ Force Majeure, ” for purposes of this Consent Decree, is defined as any event beyond the control of MPC , its contractors, or any entity controlled by MPC that delays the performance of any obligation under this Consent Decree despite MPC ’s best efforts to fulfill the obligation. The requirement that MPC exercise “ best efforts to fulfill the obligation ” includes using best efforts to anticipate any potential F orce M ajeure event and best efforts to address the effects of any such event: (a) as it is occurring; and (b) after it has occurred, to prevent or minimize any resulting delay
. 88. “ Force Majeure ” does not include MPC ’s financial inability to perform any obligation under this Consent Decree. Unanticipated or increased costs or expenses associated with the performance of MPC ’s obligations under this Consent Decree shall not constitute circ umstances beyond MPC ’s control nor serve as the basis for an extension of time under this Section X. 89. If any event occurs or has occurred that may delay the performance of any obligation under this Consent Decree, whether or not caused by a Force Majeure event, MPC shall notify EPA in writing not later than fifteen calendar days after the time MPC first knew or should have known by the exercise of due diligence that the event might cause a delay. In the written notice, MPC shall specifically reference this Paragraph 8 9 of the Consent Decree and shall provide an explanation and description of the reasons for the delay; the anticipated duration of the delay; all actions taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay; a schedule for implementation of a ny measures to be taken to prevent or mitigate the delay or the effect of the delay; MPC ’s rationale for attributing such delay to a Force Majeure event if it intends to assert such a claim ; and a statement as to whether, in the opinion of MPC , such event may cause or

72

### contribute to an endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment. MPC shall be deemed to know of any circumstance of which MPC , any entity controlled by MPC , or MPC ’s contractors knew or should have known. MPC shall include with a ny notice all available documentation supporting the claim that the delay was attributable to a Force Majeure. The written notice required by this Paragraph shall be effective upon the mailing of the same by overnight mail or by certified mail, return rec eipt requested, to EPA in the manner set forth in Section X V of this Decree (Notices). 90. Failure by MPC to comply with the requirements in Paragraph 89 shall preclude MPC from asserting any claim of Force Majeure for the event for the period of time of such failure to comply, and for any additional delay caused by such failure. 91. If EPA agrees that the delay or anticipated delay is attributable to a Force Majeure event, the time for performance of the obligations under this Consent Decree that are affected by the Force Majeure event will be extended by EPA for such time as is necessary to complete those obligations. An extension of the time for performance of the obligations affected by the Force Majeure event shall not, of itself, extend the time for performance of any other obligation. EPA will notify MPC in writing of the length of the extension, if any, for performance of the obligations affected by the Force Majeure event. 92. If EPA does not agree that the delay or anticipated delay has been or will be caused by a Force Majeure event, or if the EPA and MPC fail to agree on the length of the delay attributable to the Force Majeure event, EPA will notify MPC of its decision. 93. If MPC elects to invoke the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section XI of t his Decree (Dispute Resolution), it shall do so no later than 45 days after receipt of EPA ’ s notice. In any such proceeding, MPC shall have the burden of demonstrating by a

73

### preponderance of the evidence that the delay or anticipated delay has been or will be caused by a Force Majeure event, that the duration of the delay or the extension sought was or will be warranted under the circumstances, that best efforts were exercised to avoid and mitigate the effects of the delay, and that MPC complied with the requirements of Paragraphs 87 and 89
. If MPC carries this burden, the delay at issue shall be deemed not to be a violation by MPC of the affected obligation of this Consent Decree identified to EPA and the Court. XI. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 94. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this Consent Decree, the dispute resolution procedures of this Section shall be the exclusive mechanism to resolve disputes arising under or with respect to this Consent Decree. 95. Informal Dispute Resolution . The first stage of dispute resolution shall consist of informal negotiations. The dispute shall be considered to have arisen when one Party sends the other Party a written Notice of Dispute. Such Notice of Dispute shall state clearly the matter in dispute. The period of info rmal negotiations shall not exceed 6 0 days after the Notice of Dispute, unless that period is modified by written agreement. If the Parties cannot resolve the dispute by informal negotiations, then the position advanced by the United States shall be considered binding unless within 45 days after the conclusion of the informal negotiation period, MPC invokes formal dispute resolution procedures set forth below. 96. Formal Dispute Resolution
. MPC shall invoke formal dispute resolution procedures, within the time period provided in the preceding Paragraph, by serving on the United States a written Statement of Position regarding the matter in dispute. The Statement of Position shall include, but need not be limited to, any factual data, analysis, or opinion supporting MPC ’s position and any supporting documentation relied upon by MPC
.

74

### 97. The United States shall serve its Statement of Position within 45 days of receipt of MPC ’s State ment of Position. The United States’ Statement of Position shall include, but need not be limited to, any factual data, analysis, or opinion supporting that position and any supporting documentation relied upon by the United States. The United States’ Statement of Position shall be binding on MPC unless MPC files a motion for judicial review of the dispute in accordance with the following Paragraph. 98. MPC may seek judicial review of the dispute by filing with the Court and serving, in accordance with Section XV of this Decree (Notices), on the United States a motion requesting judicial re solution of the dispute. The motion must be filed within 45 days of receipt of the United States ’ Statement of Position pursuant to the preceding Paragraph. The motion shall contain a written statement of MPC ’s position on the matter in dispute, includin g any supporting factual data, analysis, opinion, or documentation, and shall set forth the relief requested and any schedule within which the dispute must be resolved for orderly implementation of the Consent Decree. 99. The United States shall respond to MPC ’s motion within the time period allowed by the Local Rules of this Court for responses to dispositive motions. MPC may file a reply memorandum, to the extent permitted by the Local Rules. 100. In a formal dispute resolution proceeding under this Section, MPC shall bear the burden of demonstrating that its position complies with this Consent Decree and the CAA and that it is entitled to relief under applicable principles of law. The United States reserves the right to argue that its position is reviewable only on the administrative record and must be upheld unless arbitrary and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law, and MPC reserves the right to argue to the contrary.

75

### 101. The invocation of dispute resolution procedures under this Section shall not, by itself, extend, postpone, or affect in any way any obligation of MPC under this Consent Decree, unless and until final resolution of the dispute so provides. Stipulated penalties with respect to the disputed matter shall accrue in accordance with Paragrap h 84, but payment shall be stayed pending resolution of the dispute. XII. INFORMATION COLLECTION AND RETENTION 102. The United States and its representatives , employees , contractors, and consultants shall have the right of entry into the Covered Refineries, at all reasonable times, upon presentation of credentials and any other documentation required by law, to:
a. monitor the progress of activities required under this Consent Decree; b. verify any data or information submitted to the United States in accordance with the terms of this Consent Decree;

c. obtain documentary evidence, including photographs and similar data, relevant to compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree; and d. assess MPC ’s compliance with this Consent Decree. 103. Except for data r ecorded by any video camera that may be required pursuant to Paragraph 24, u ntil one year after termination of this Consent Decree, MPC shall retain, and shall instruct its contractors and agents to preserve, all documents, records, or other information, regardless of storage medium ( e.g. , paper or electronic ) in its or its contractors’ or agents’ possession or control, or that come into its or its contractors ’ or agents ’ possession or control, and that directly relate to MPC ’s performance of its obligations under this Consent Decree. This information -retention requirement shall apply regardless of any contrary corporate or institutional policies or procedures. At any time during this information -retention period, the United States may request copies of an y documents, records, or other information required to be

76

### maintained under this Paragraph. MPC shall retain the data recorded by any video c amera required pursuant to Paragraph 24 for six months from the date of recording except that MPC shall keep any su ch video record until one year after termination if MPC was required to keep the record pursuant to Subp aragraph 5 5 .c. 104. Except for emissions data, MPC may assert that information required to be provided under this Section is protected as Confidential Business Information (“ CBI ”) under 40 C.F.R. Part 2. As to any information that MPC seeks to protect as CBI, MPC shall follow the procedures set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 2 , where applicable
. 105. This Consent Decree in no way limits or affects any right of entry and inspection, or any right to obtain information, held by the United States pursuant to applicable federal laws, regulations, or permits, nor does it limit or affect any duty or obligation of MPC to maintain documents, records, or other information impose d by applicable federal or state laws, regulations, or permits. XIII. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 106. Definitions . For purposes of this Section XIII , the following definitions apply:
a. “BTU/scf Flared Gas Requirements” shall mean the requirem ents found in the following regulations: i. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(3)(ii); ii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(6)(ii); iii. 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.482-10(d), 60.482-10a(d), but only to the extent that these provisions require compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(3)(ii); iv. 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.592(a) , 60.592a(a) , but only to the extent that these provisions : (1) relate to flares; and (2) require compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(3)(ii);

77

### v. 40 C.F.R. § 63.643(a)(1), but only to the extent that this provision requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(6)(ii); vi. 40 C.F.R. § 63.648(a), but only to the extent that this provision: (1) relates to flares; and (2) requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(3)(ii); and vii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.1566(a)(1)(i) and Table 15, but onl y to the extent that these provisions: (1) relate to flares; and (2) require compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(6)(ii). b. “General Flare Requirements” shall mean the requirements found in the following regulations: i. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(1) and 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(4) (both relate to a prohibition on visible emissions); ii. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(2) and 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(5) (both relate to flame presence); iii. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(c)(4) and 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(7) (both relate to exit velo city requirements for steam

- assisted flares); iv. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(e) and 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(3) (both relate to operation during emissions venting).
c. “Good Air Pollution Control Practice Requirements” shall mean the requirements found in the foll owing regulations: i. 40 C.F.R. § 60.11(d); ii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.6(e)(1)(i); iii. 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart CC, Table 6, but only to the extent that Table 6 requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.6(e)(1)(i); and iv. 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart UUU, Table 44, but only to the extent that Table 44 requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.6(e)(1). d. “Post

- Lodging Compliance Dates” shall mean any dates in this Section XIII after the Date of Lodging;

78

### e. “PSD/NNSR Requirements” shall mean the Prevention of Si gnificant Deterioration and Non- Attainment New Source Review requirements found in the following: i. 42 U.S.C. § 7475; ii. 40 C.F.R. §§ 52.21(a)(2)(iii) and 52.21(j)–52.21(r)(5); iii. 42 U.S.C. §§ 7502(c)(5), 7503(a)

– (c); iv. 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix S, Part IV, Conditions 1–4;
v. any applicable, federally enforceable state or local regulation that implements, adopts, or incorporates the federal provisions cited in Subparagraphs 106 .e.i –iv; and vi. any Title V permit requirement that implements, ad opts, or incorporates the federal, or federally enforceable state, provisions cited in Subparagraphs 106.e.i–v; f. “Requirements Related to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design” shall mean the requirements found in the followin g regulations: i. 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(d); ii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(1); iii. 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.482-10(d), 60.482- 10a(d), but only to the extent that these provisions require compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(d); iv. 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.482-10(e), 60.482- 10a(e), but only to the extent that th ese provisions relate to flares;
v. 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.592(a) , 60.592a(a), but only to the extent that th ese provisions: (1) relate to flares; and (2) require compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(d); vi. 40 C.F.R. § 63.643(a)(1), but only to the extent that this provision requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(1); vii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.648(a), but only to the extent that this provision: (1) relates to flares; and (2) requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 60.18(d);

79

### viii. 40 C.F.R. § 63.1566(a)(1)(i) and Table 15 but only to the extent that this provision: (1) relates to flares; and (2) requires compliance with 40 C.F.R. § 63.11(b)(1). g. “Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements” shall mean the following requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart Ja, that are stayed pursuant to 73 F.R. 78549 (Dec. 22, 2008 ); i. SO 2 

### and H 2 

### S emissions limits applicable to flares (set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 60.102a(g)(1)(i) and (ii) (2010) respectively); ii. Sulfur monitoring for flares (set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 60.107a(d) (2010) ); and iii. Flow monitoring for flares (set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 60.107a(e) (2010) ). If a final rule encompassing these Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements places them in different locations in Subpart Ja with different citations, the definition herein refers to the subject of the regulation ( e.g. , “SO 2 

### emission limits applicable to flares”) and not to the citation. 107. Entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States for the violations alleged in the Comp laint filed in this action through the Date of Lodging. 108. Resolution of Claims for Violating PSD/NNSR Requirements at the Covered Flares
. With respect to emissions of H 2 

### S, SO 2 

### , VOCs, and CO, entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States against MPC for violations of the PSD/NNSR Requirements resulting from construction or modification from the date of the pre- Lodging construction or modification through, for each Covered Flare, the date in Column J of Appendix 2.1 associated with that Covered Flare. 109. Resolution of Pre

- Lodging Claims at the Covered Flares for Failing to Comply with: (a) BTU/scf Flared Gas Requirements; (b) General Flare Requirements; (c) Good Air Pollution Control Practice Requirements; (d) Requirements Relat ed to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design; and (e) 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J . With respect

80

### to emissions of the following pollutants from the Covered Flares, entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States against MPC for violations of the following requirements from the date those claims accrued through the Date of Lodging: Pollutant(s) Requirement/Regulation VOCs and HAPs BTU/scf Flared Gas Requirements VOCs and HAPs General Flare Requirem ents VOCs and HAPs Good Air Pollution Control Practice Requirements VOCs and HAPs Requirements Related to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design SO 2 

### and H 2 

### S 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J

110. Resolution of Claims Continuing Post- Lo dging at the Covered Flares for Failing to Comply with: (a) Requirements Related to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design; and (b) Two Provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J
. a. Requirements Related to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design
. With respect to emissions of VOCs and HAPs from the Covered Flares, entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States against MPC for the violations set forth in Subparagraph 110.a.i, for the time frame set forth in Subparagraph 110 .a.ii: i. Violations of Requirements Related to Monitoring, Operation, and Maintenance According to Flare Design, but only to the extent that the claims are based on MPC’s use of too much steam in relat ion to Vent Gas flow; ii. The resolution of liability in Subparagraph 110 .a.i extends from the Date of Lodging through, for each Covered Flare, the date in Column C of Appendix 2.1 that is associated with that Covered Flare.

81

### b. Two Provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J . With respect to emissions of SO 2 

### , entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States against MPC for violations of the following two provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J, from the Date of Lodging through, for each Covered Flare, the date in the following columns in Appendix 2.1 that is associated with that Covered Flare: 40 C.F.R. § 60.104(a)(1)

(H 2 

### S Emission Limit) 40 C.F.R. § 60.105(a)(4) (H 2 

### S Monitoring) Column J Column C

111. Conditional Resolution of Claims under Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements . If EPA lifts the stay on the Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements and promulgates final regulations encompassing the Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements, then entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil cl aims of the United States against MPC for violations of the Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements from the date that a final rule encompassing the Stayed Subpart Ja Requirements is effective through, for each Covered Flare, the date in the following columns in Appendix 2.1 that is associated with that Covered Flare : SO 2 

### and H 2 

### S Emission Limits (currently at 40 C.F.R. § 60.102a(g)(1)(i) and (ii)) Sulfur and Flow Monitoring (currently at 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.107a(d),(e)) Column J Column C

112. Resolution of Title V V iolati ons . Entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve the civil claims of the United States against MPC for the violations of Sections 502(a), 503(c), and 504(a) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661a(a), 7661b(c), 7661c(a), and of 40 C.F.R. §§ 70.1(b),

82

### 70.5(a) and (b), 70.6(a) and (c), and 70.7(b), that are based upon the violations resolved by Paragraphs 108–111 for the time frames set forth in those Paragraphs. 113. Reservation of Rights: Resolution of Liability in Paragraphs 108 and 110–112 can be Rendered Void . Notwit hstanding the resolution of liability in Paragraphs 108 and 110– 112 for the period of time between the Date of Lodging and the Post-Lodging Compliance D ates, those resolutions of liability shall be rendered void if MPC materially fails to comply with any o f the obligations and requirements of Sections V and VI of this Decree (Compliance Requirements and Emission Credit Generation). However:
a. To the extent that a material failure involves a particular Covered Refinery(ies), the resolution of liability s hall be rendered void only with respect to claims involving that particular Covered Refinery(ies); b. The resolutions of liability in Paragraphs 108 and 110–112 shall not be rendered void if MPC, as expeditiously as practicable, remedies such material fa ilure and pays all stipulated penalties due as a result of such material failure. 114. The United States reserve s all legal and equitable remedies available to enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree, except as expressly stated in Paragraphs 107–112. Thi s Consent Decree shall not be construed to limit the rights of the United States to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under the CAA or implementing regulations, or under other federal or state laws, regulations, or permit conditions, except as expressl y specified in Paragraph s 107–112. The United States further reserve s all legal and equitable remedies to address any imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare or the environment arising at, or posed by, the Covered Refineries, whether related to the violations addressed in th is Consent Decree or otherwise.

83

### 115. In any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding initiated by the United States for injunctive relief, civil penalties, other appropriate relief relating to the Covered Refineries or MPC ’s CAA violations, MPC shall not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon the principles of waiver, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, claim -splitting, or other defenses based upon any contention that the claims raised by the United States in the subsequent proceeding were or should have been brought in the instant case, except with respect to claims that have been specifically resolved pursuant to Paragraphs 107–112 of this Section and for which the resolution of liability has not been voided pursuant to Paragraph 113. 116. This Consent Decree is not a permit, or a modification of any permit, under any federal, state, or local laws or regulations. MPC is responsible for achieving and ma intaining complete compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and permits; and MPC’ s compliance with this Consent Decree shall be no defense to any action commenced pursuant to any such laws, regulations, or permits, except as set forth herein. The United States do es not, by its consent to the entry of this Consent Decree, warrant or aver in any manner that MPC’ s compliance with any aspect of this Consent Decree will result in compliance with provisions of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. , or with any other provisions of federal, s tate, or local laws, regulations, or permits. 117. This Consent Decree does not limit or affect the rights of MPC or the United States against any third parties that are not party to this Consent Decree, nor does it li mit the rights of third parties that are not party to this Consent Decree against MPC , except as otherwise provided by law.

84

### 118. This Consent Decree shall not be construed to create rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any third party not party to this Consent Decree. XI V. COSTS 119. The Parties shall bear their own costs of this action, including attorneys = fees, except that the United States shall be entitled to collect the costs (including attorneys = fees) incurred in any action necessary to enforce this Consent Decree or to collect any portion of the civil penalty or any stipulated penalties due but not paid by MPC
. XV. NOTICES 120. Unless otherwise specified herein, whenever notifications, submissions, or communications are required by this Consent Decree, they shall be made in writing and addressed to the persons set forth below. Submission by U.S. mail or courier is required and shall be sufficient to comply with the notice requirements of this Consent Decree ; however, for the submission o f technical information or data, MPC shall submit the data in electronic form ( e.g. , a disk or hard drive). The email addresses listed below are to permit the submission of courtesy copies. Notice or submission to the United States : Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice Box 7611 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-7611 Re: DOJ No. 90 -5-2-1-09915

85

### Notice or submission to EPA : For All Covered Refineries: Director, Air Enforceme nt Division Office of Civil Enforcement U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code 2242-A Regular Mail: 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. Ariel Rios Building South Room 1119 Washington, DC 20460-0001 Express Mail: Use same address but use 20004 as the zip code and Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 5 77 W. Jackson Blvd. (AE-17J) Chicago, IL 60604 Attn: Compliance Tracker For courtesy purposes, electronic copies to: parrish.robert@epa.gov foley.patrick@epa.gov dickens.brian@epa.gov For EPA, for the Catlettsburg Refinery: Director Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division EPA Region 4 61 Forsyth Street (4APTMD-A EEB) Atlanta, Georgia 30303

86

### For EPA, for the Garyville and Texas City Refineries : Associate Director Air, Toxics, and Inspections Coordination Branch (6 EN- A) U.S. EPA, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202 Notice or submission to MPC : Envir onmental and Safety Manager, Refinery Operations Marathon Petroleum Company LP 539 S. Main St. Findlay, OH 45840 Consent Decree Coordinator (Flare Consent Decree) Marathon Petroleum Company LP 539 S. Main St. Findlay, OH 45840 and Group Counsel – Envi ronment, Safety & Security Marathon Petroleum Company LP 539 S. Main St. Findlay, OH 45840 Any Party may, by written notice to the other Party, change its designated notice recipient(s) or notice address(es) provided above. Notices submitted pursuant to this Section shall be deemed submitted upon mailing, unless otherwise provided in this Consent Decree or by mutual agreement of the Parties in writing. XV I. EFFECTIVE DATE 121. The Effective Date of this Consent Decree shall be the date upon which this Consent Decree is entered by the Court or a motion to enter the Consent Decree is granted, whichever occurs first, as recorded on the Court’s docket; provided however, th at MPC hereby agrees that it shall be bound to perform duties scheduled to occur prior to t he Effective Date. In

87

### the event the United States withdraws or withholds consent to this Consent Decree before entry, or the Court declines to enter this Consent Decree, then the preceding requirement to perform duties scheduled to occur before the Effect ive Date shall terminate. XV II. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 122. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case until termination of this Consent Decree for the purpose s of resolving disputes arising under this Decree, entering orders modifying this Decree, or effectuating or enforcing compliance with the terms of this Decree. XV III. MODIFICATION 123. Except as provided in Paragraph 9, t he terms of this Consent Decree may be modified only by a subsequent written agreement signed by the United States and MPC . Whe re the modification constitutes a material change to any term of this Consent Decree, it shall be effective only upon approval by the Court. 124. Except as provided in Paragraphs 5– 9, a ny disputes concerning modification of this Decree shall be resolved pursuant to Section XI of this Decree (Dispute Resolution); provided, however, that instead of the burden of proof as provided by Paragraph 100 , the Party seeking the modification bears the burden of demonstrating that it is entitled to the requested modificatio n in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). XIX. TERMINATION 125. Termination: One Covered Refinery or Entire Consent Decree . If the conditions precedent to termination set forth in Paragraph 126 are satisfied, t he requirements of this Consent Decree that are applicable to one Covered Refiner y may be subject to termination or all of the requirements in this Consent Decree may be subject to termination.

88

### 126. Termination: Conditions Precedent . Prior to termination, MPC must have completed and sati sfied all of the following requirements of this Consent Decree:

a. Payment of all civil penalties, stipulated penalties and other monetary obligations; termination as to one Covered Refinery may not be sought unless all penalties and/or monetary obligation s are paid, regardless of which Covered Refinery is the subject of such monetary obligation; b. Compliance with all provisions of Section V of this Decree (Compliance Requirements) with respect to all of the Covered Flares at the Covered Refinery(ies) tha t is(are) subject to the termination request ;
c. Operation for at least one year in compliance with the limitations and standards set forth in Paragraphs 39, 46.b.iv, 47.b, 48.c, 48 .d (for the Detroit Crude Flare), and 49 for all of the Covered Flares at the Covered Refinery(ies) that is (are) subject to the termination request; d. For the Detroit Refinery, completion of the Mitigation Project in Section VII;
e. Application for and receipt of all non- Title V permits necessary to ensure survival of the Con sent Decree limits and standards after termination of this Consent Decree (the Paragraph 61 requirement) for all of the Covered Flares at the Covered Refinery(ies) that is(are) subject to the termination request; and f. Application for a modification or a mendment to the Title V permit to incorporate the limits and standards in Paragraph 61 into the Title V permit of the Covered Refinery(ies) that is(are) subject to the termination request. 127. Termination: Procedure
. a. At such time as MPC believes that it has satisfied the conditions for termination set forth in Paragraph 126 for any one Covered Refinery or for the entire Consent Decree, MPC may submit a request for termination to the United States by certifying such compliance in accordance with the certi fication language in Paragraph 73. In the Request for Termination, MPC must demonstrate that it has satisfied the conditions for termination set forth

89

### in Paragraph 126. The Request for Termination shall include all necessary supporting documentation. b. Following receipt by the United States of MPC ’s Request for Termination, the Parties shall confer informally concerning the Request. If the United States agree s that the Decree may be terminated, the Parties shall submit, for the Court's approval, a joi nt stipulation terminating the Decree.
c. If the United States do es not agree that the Consent Decree may be terminat ed , or if MPC does not receive a written response from the United States within 60 days of MPC’s submission of the Request for Termination, MPC may invoke dispute resolution under Section XI of this Decree (Dispute Resolution). XX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 128. This Consent Decree shall be lodged with the Court for a period of not less than 30 days for public notice and comment in accordance with 28 C.F.R. § 50.7. The United States reserves the right to withdraw or withhold its consent if the comments regarding the Consent Decree disclose facts or considerations indicating that the Consent Decree is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. MPC co nsents to entry of this Consent Decree without further notice and agrees not to withdraw from or oppose entry of this Consent Decree by the Court or to challenge any provision of the Decree unless the United States has notified MPC in writing that it no lo nger supports entry of the Decree.

90

### XX I. SIGNATORIES/SERVICE 129. Each undersigned representative of MPC and the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice (or his or her designee) , certif y that h e or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and to execute and legally bind the Party he or she represents to this document. 130. This Consent Decree may be signed in counterparts, and its validity shall not be cha llenged on that basis. MPC agree s to accept service of process by mail with respect to all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree and to waive the formal service requirements set forth in Rules 4 and 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable Local Rules of this Court including, but not limited to, service of a summons. XX II. INTEGRATION 131. This Consent Decree and its Appendi ces constitute the final, complete, and exclusive agreement and understanding among the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in this Consent Decree and its Appendi xes and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, concerning the settlement embodied herein. No other document, except for any plans or other deliverables that are submitted pursuant to this Decree, nor any representation, inducement, agreement, understanding, or promise, constitutes any part of this Decree or the settlement it represents, and no such extrinsic document or statement of any kind shall be used in construing the terms of this Decree.

91

### XXI II. FINAL JUDGMENT 132. Upon approval and entry of this Consent Decree by the Court, this Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment of the Court in this action as to the United States and MPC . The Court finds that there is no just reason for delay and therefore enters this judgment as a final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58.
DATED this day of 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

92

### ______________________________

______________________________ We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States, et al. v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al. , subject to public notice and comment.

FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice

ANNETTE M. LANG Environmental Enforcement Section Env ironment and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202) 514-4213 (202) 616-6584 (fax) annette.lang@usdoj.gov
BARBARA L. MCQUADE United States Attorney Eastern District of Mich igan
By:
____________________________ ELLEN CHRISTENSEN Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Michigan 211 W. Fort St., Suite 2001 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226-9784 e llen.christensen @usdoj.gov

### We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al., subject to public notice and comment.
FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

CYNTHIA GILES Assistant Administrator Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

### We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum C ompany LP, et al., subject to public notice and comment.
FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4

MARY J. WILKES Regional Counsel and Director Office of Environmental Accountability U.S. EPA Region 4 61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, Georgia 30303

### _____________________________ We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al., subject to public notice and comment.
FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5

SUSAN HEDMAN Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Chicago, IL

ROBERT A. KAPLAN Regional Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Chicago, IL

### We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al., subject to public notice and comment.
FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6

JOHN BLEVINS Director Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division EPA Region 6 Dallas, TX

### We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al.

FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY L P, BY MPC INVESTMENT LLC, its General Partner

R. D. B EDELL Senior Vice President Marathon Petroleum Company LP 539 South Main S t. Findlay, Ohio 45840 Phone: 419 421-2967 Fax: 419 421-4377 rdbedell@marathonpetroleum.com

### We hereby consent to the entry of the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP, et al.
FOR CATLE TTSBURG REFINING , LLC

R. D. B EDELL President of Catlettsburg Refining, LLC Marathon Petroleum Company LP 539 South Main St. Findlay, Ohio 45840 Phone: 419 421-2967 Fax: 419 421-4377 rdbedell@marathonpetroleum.com

### U.''I'fTED ST A TE S 

# ". MARA 

# '''0 . .\1 

### PUROiH 'M C OJf P. 1 .' Vl'



## APPENIlICES TO CONSENT IlECKEE



# APPENDIX 1.1

DRAWINGS ILLUSTRATING LOWER, CENTER, AND UPPER STEAM INJECTION IN VARIOUS TYPES OF FLARE TIPS

## Appe ndix 1 .1 

# T

ype



# - ED

,

Cente r 

## Steam Up,,", Steam 

### I • 

## • ' ''' P ilot -



# T ype Is



# -

ED

,



### Upper Steam 

# Type J[
Elllt Lowe r Sl8illr1"11A1.**i~ tur** 



### Upper S team

Cen ter 

## S leam Lowe< S team



# "

" V_ a V.... lGu Rec:t • F

.. l'IItlI BJo. 

### s.- I"" 0.
... 81'" • Steam

# A ppendix 1 .1
T

ype JI[ 

# T ype 

# llZ:



# u_ Steam



# • ,



# .., v_ . _Go-.

_ • F .. lJgN_ •**s~ ,,..**  o-!lI<oo • 

## sLowe< Sleam

# u. .. .. , TED ST. , I 

### T ES 

# "

. , ' H R.
.. TII 0 \ ' PET ROI.El. ' .H rO MP AS Y



## A J' I 'EN nICE S TO C ONSENT D E CR EE



# APPEND IX. 1.2

G EN ERAL EQ UATIO NS

### APPENDIX 

## 1.2

Gl :N} :RAL J :O lJAT 10:'\iS f. -q u at;on J: 

### " Comb ust;on**fJi ~n** **q"** ur .. 

# c t. ... : C£ {COJ /(ICOJ + 

### IC OJ + 

### (OCj )

w here : Co n cent ration in volu me perce nt Of pp m-met ers o f carbo n d iOll. ilk in t he 

### com b uslt. 'd**~as immcdiatd**  

### above the C ombUSl ion 

### l.onc 

### {('O!

- COlJCe n h -dtion i n volume percen t or ppm-meters of c arbon m onoxide in the c ombusted**~il.'I** immediately abo ve 

### the 

### C o mbust ion {.(me 

### ! lK!
.. Co ncentration 

### in volume percent or ppm-meters of t he sum of a ll o rg anic carbon 

### c ompounds i n 

### t he combus ted gas imm e diatel y a bove the Combus lion Zone , counting eac h carbo n m o lec u le Kpanl l ely 

### where the co ncentra tion o f each i nd il ' idual compo und l s mu lt ip lied by the 

### n um b.:r o f car bon at oms i t co ntains bef ore s umm ing (e ,g , 0
. 1 volume p.:«: cnt 

### ethane shall cou nt 8.5 0. 2 perce nt OC 

### becau se e thane 

### has t wo carbo n ato ms) F o r rurJIOse1**of\lSi n~**  

### the 

### CE equatio n , the un i t of measurement for C (h , CO , an d 

### OC' m ust 

### be the same : that 

### i s. ir "volume percent" is 

### used for o ne c ompoun d, i t must 

### be u so:d for all co mpounds
. " Volum e percen t" cannot be u s ed fo r o ne o r more c ompourlolb 

### itnd**"ptn-mc te~**  f or t he rem a i nde r
.


## Q

..... .f 

### (/8! J 8J
. J) where : 

### Q

- • C ent er S team Vo l umct ric 

### 1'10\\ R a te EqUGt i on 

### J : MTOIIJ I S t eum .lI W J Fl o M' Rll tr " 0 1' M th , " : Q. x 

### (/JJ /JHJ .J ) 

# -

. •
Q
. 

## • Total St eam Vol ume tric F low Rate

I 

# c rz

## A PPENDIX 1.2
Eq uation 4: 

### " V r nl G r» ' 

### Ma u Ho w R at l! " o r " ,;, ..., ";


## m

. • where :

0 

## Q

"li Vent Gas Vol umetric Flow Rate ;\f lf" " 

## • M olecula r W eight , in pounds per pound- mule, of 

### th e Vent G as, as measured 

### b y the Ven t Gas Aver age 

### Mo lecular Weig ht Anal yze r 

### de scribed in Paragra ph 19 o f t hi s 

### C onsent De cree

[End 

### o f A ppendix 1.2]

2 0f 2

### ( tN lTED STATU 

# '

. MA R e t T lIO.\' P£T ROU '(!M Cm fPA,\'Y



## A PPENDICES T O C ONSENT D ECREE



# APPENDIX 1.3

CALCU LAT ING N HV CZ -L1 MIT 

# A ND N HV cz 

# FOR S T R EAM-ASS IS TE D F LA RES

### A P PD iDiX I.J

All a bbrn iat i ons, conslan b .lIIl<l v ' m ablcs arc d efined in the K ey on P age 6 of t h i s**Ap pl:n** **di~**



### S tep I : H ele rm in e the L o .. er n ammab ili ll ' Um i lIMLn ." , of 

### r u h I nd ividu al V enl 

### { ;u Co m pou nd Take !h e 

### I.F L**lUl:~** 

### o f 

### eac h i ndivid ual V m t Gas 

### com pound f rom Table 

### I in Ihi s**PflCndi~** 

### S te p 2 ;**u h lr**  

### Ih e LF L u fl h e v ' e nt g al m i 1lu ", t he a vera g e l o wer ll am mability li mi t o fthe ven t gas i s calc ulated by 

### L e Cha tdie r ' s equa ti o n shown be lo w as 

### Eq uation 

### L Thi s c a lcul atio n use s 

### t M
.. 

### - eig med average of tile 

### l.fh o f t be i ndividual com pounds
.. 

### eighted by thei r volume fraction of 1M v ent i!1IS All incrts.**ud** 

### n it roge n . arc assu m ed 10 h ave an infinite lo
.. e r fl ammabilit y ' l im i t (e .g . LFL I/2 · <>0 )
.



### Step 

### J : " cterm i n t' t ht' S ci I h ' alin e Va lu< ' u e th e \' c nt 

### G u ('I; 

### II \' • 

### ..J H a C h n
. ma l0 ll: n p h " u_ e d : The net hea ting v alue of t he vent gas**i~** 

### calcu l ated and 

### reported f rom the 

### GC e t the c on clusio n u f each an alytic al c ycle ( -10· 1 5 minu te s )
. Equatio n 2 i s used by ' t he GC to calculate t ile ve rn gas net bc aung value I rcm each i ndividua l compoun d IlC t heating v etu e. I ndividual c ompoun d v olu me frac t ions , exce p t fo r wate r , lire mea sured directly by t he GC
. A company i s 001 req uir ed 10 m easure w llter in 

### vem GlIlI
. I f a co mpa ny c hooses to meas ure w a ter , then : 

### ( i) i f 

### the w ater mca l Ufe men t 

### is take n u pst ream o f a kn ock-out d ru m , t h en wat c l docs not 

### h .we to be i ecfudcd in t he calculatio n of**IlV** 

### • •: (ii} 

### if no knoc k -o ut 

### drum e xists o r if t he water mea surement i s tek en ane r !he k n o,

:k-o ut d rum. t h e n t he c o m pany mu st include water in 

### the culculu li on of 

### I\' I IY ,. 

### and ad ju s t t he c o ncemr atio n of th e co mpo un ds m easure d b y th e GC t o u wet 

### bas i s . l ndivid ca l com puund net he ating , ·a1 ues. includin g w a te r , are fiste d i n Table 

### I of !h is 

### Arpcndilt
. 

# •**NHV** L ( x , ' NHV ,) f. ·q ua/io n 1 

# ,. 

# ,

NO T E : T able I i ncludes t " o ahemeuv e values fo r t he Ne l H eating Value o f' hy drogee : t h e ac tua l N IlV o f h y drogen (274 8 llJ / scO 

### and an " adj ll5 tcd r 

### N IlV of hydrcgen ( 1 2 12 B TU I 'lC f)
.
1 

## o r to

## APP ENUIX 1.3 Companic: , 

### baH ' the o ption o f usi ng e ither i n ca lcu lating 

### N I I

V. I ; ho weve r . w hichever option i s selec ted a lso m ust he 

### used i n cal cu lating 

### N IIV ",.

U si n g 

### U L- I 

### f rom Eq uation 

### I 

### and N I IV ' I 

### from E q uation 

### 2 .lhe l"IIV .1

_ UL is 

### cal culated b y E41 L Lati on 

### 3. N IIV r,- /Fl 

## = NI/V ., . 

## tFt " E quul l m. J
S ic.'!! 5 : 

### Mullinl )' N II V
. I

_ I fl 

### b)"l h e Co m b udioll E ffid nn**ll 1in**  1 0 

### n leu h
. l c Ih e 

### N I1V Q 

# "' miI Th e Net Heati n g V alue o f tile Gase s i n 

### the Co mbu stion Zone 

### ( N II V g ) 

### of II**Fl** 

### tbat is ncedl'd 1 0 

### ensure an acceptable C om bus tion 

### Effi ciency i s 

### determ ined b y m uhipl) 'i l\l! N IIV
. .... 

### n. 

### b) ' C o m bustio n E fficie ncy Multipli ers appro priat e to 

### t he**na~** 

### ca tegory a nd 

### the \ 'o lume pe rcent o f hydrogen in the Ven t Gas as d efine d in Table 2
. Th e N",tl kating Value of Co m b us tion Zon e G as 

### l.imit i s cakuh llW M fo lio... s : N 1/V <z- l,mot 

## = ( A 

## + 8 · .t ".." Y l<

.. ) · NIfV

. , _Lf L


### S l e p 6 : C a l c ul a l e Ib e Nel li e ating V al" e o r Ih e C om bu
. ti n n Z o n r 

## «; .. (!'Ii 

### 11\ ' g l The 

### N II V in the c ombus tion zo n e ( N U V u ) 

### c om bine s th e N II Vs of thc V en l Gas
. pi lo t gas . and ste am a nd i s calcu late d b ) ' E quation Sa t bascd on**ma.~** 

### fl ow m ca . u teme nt ) or S b 

### t based o n v olu me t ri c fl o .... m eas urem ent)
. Th ese 1 "" 0 e quation s are e quivalent f or c o m b us tio n to n l.' co ndi t ions
. as s ho
.... n i n Add endum A 1 0 t hi s Appendix
. Th e N l IV of s l
.. am is ass uml'd to be ze ro . Vent G as ll ow re t e lin '7i' o r 

### Q.,) lind steam nnw rat e 

### ( III, 

## o r Q ,I arc m ... 

### as UrN b) ' o n - li ne n ow meters . TIte pil ot g a s nnw rate ( In". 

## o r QPli) 

### i s c onstant for eac h fl are 

### and se t by an ori fi ce .

E qua r /tIf. Sa 

## 0. ( Q ., ' NHV ., ) t 

### (Q ,. ' NNY , , )**NH~** _ Equot tl

IJII S IJ 

### Q

., +Q •• + Q .+ Q
l of 10

### APP E:"oiI))X 1.3

T he va lues for 

# m •

.**TO** 

### Q , en d 

### Q "" arc d ete rmin ed a s follo ws b ased on the t ype of flare :**ell -A** **,~i le** **tl** 

### Flan 'w 'i lhout a Mini mum S te am R edu ctio n S} 5 l e m ( "M SR S " 1 

# m , or 

### Q , = 

### meas ured val ue**~i** 

### or**~l** 

## = 0**tn m-** **'\~, ;,** **tc** 

### n ar c w ilh MS RS 

# e . o r Q, 

## = m easured v alue**i. Q~;**  

## = r esult from E quat ion 13 

### in Ste p 6a 

# ,.**m~ ;r**  

### or**Q~ ;r**  

### = 

### 0 

### w ith 

### v enaor c enmcsuon t hat thl: MS RS eq utp men t ms re tted o n the fla rP is n ot ca pable (e ven at mini mum v e nt gils flo w) of in spirating mo re th o n tw ice t he s toic hi ometric volume of il ir i nto th e v ent ga s. Illc molecu lar weight o f the vent gas ( M W ,.,) is calcula ted by the (Ie using Equa tion 6
. An on-line 

### uhtuscnic now meter m ay also 

### be used to calc ulate MW • •. I n divid ual com pound mo lecular we ights a re listed in Table 1 of this Ap pendix , 

# • MW 

### vu = L ( X "M W ; ) £ "11 /11; 0'1 6 

## ,. 1 The**II** ofthe pilot I.!as ( NIIV
... ) and M W of the pi lot gas (M W n ) a r c calculate d using Equation. s 7 and 8
.**respe~'ti\'ely** These calculations are similar III the vent gas calculations. e xc eptlhe individ ual compound volume fract ion s er e t hat of the 

### pilot gas and nnt the ve nt gas . I nd ividual compound volu me f ractions a re measured by labor at ory ana lysis of a pilot gas sampl e, or may be taken from the n atural gas s u p pl i er 's l aborato ry ccnificare o f a naly s i s . 

# • N HV pg 

### = 

### L (P9 1 ' N H V ,) 

# ,. , • MW p g 

### = L (pg , · MW 1 ) Equarh ", 8 j ", I

3 of HI

### A PPE NIlI X 

### 1.3
S tep 6a : Calc ul atio n of air mass fl ow**ra** 

### fQr flares eq ui prc d wi lh MS RS
. The comp le te combus tion of W1 

### o rganic compoun d comprised of a combination o f carbon and hy drogen atoms is shown in E quation 9 : Equa l ;'", 9


### Note: X 

### a nd 

### y v alues for eac h co mpo u nd are fou nd in Table I of t his A ppendi x. t h erefore, the stoic hiometric o xygen molar flow rate ( moles/hr) fo r any given combus t ible compound tlow is de fined b) ' Eq uation lOa (mass bas is) or Equa tion lO b (volu metric ba s i s):



### O K E qU UI ; o ll 1/ 1 1> 

# riQ2

_ ..

# ol<**"" XI(J~~** **5)(X +~)**  Th e stoichio metric oxygen mass Ilc w rate f or t he vent gas (1 b!hr ) o r stoichiome tric oxygen vo lu metric ll ow rate for t he vent g as (sclh) is give n by Equation I I a (m ass basis) or II b (volumetric basis). 

# " M W 

### o

, • 

# L**ri0 'IO;~1I** **ril02 -<tof<~-** **~R** "" E'IU l1 t;oll 110 

# ' >' O K

# )2**II** "" 

## " 3I:lS.S. 

# L**r'1 I<** **II** EqUl1 t;oll Ilb 

# , . 

# , The stoic hiometric air m ass flow rate ( Ibfltr) or stoichiometric a ir volumetric flow rate (scfb) for the vern gas is given b y Equation 12a ( mass hasis) or Equation 1 2b (volumetric b asis).
E q ual jo" J] a 

### O K E quulitm I1b

4 of 

### 10

### APPt :NIHX 1.3 The ai r mass 

### 110
.... ( lbillour ) o r a ir volumetric now (sen l) us ed i n Eq u:llion 

### Sa o r 5 b i s 

### giv en b ) subtnK1ing two times t he stoic hiometric air from th e t ota l a ir provided b y l he M SRS
. Th is i s s ho
.... n i n E quation l3 a and l3 ,b
.



### D R

The equation f llT ,ha'
. _H S.e S 

### o r Q., r-",S.eS 

### i s specific to 

### !he: MSRS in sta lled and mun be 

### pro> 

### iJed by tlie M S R S ven dor. The facto r o f 2 

### used in E q uati Oli 1 3 i s 

### ba'iCd 01\ tllc 

### besl infOfll\lllio n available as of'jhc 

### Dme of lodg ing. lfne
.... in format ion become s availabl e lhereafter
. the: partie s may modify tlial f actor ; an> ' s uc h 

### modifi cation d ocs no t 

### cons t itute 1I 

### material modifica tion 1 0 

### t he COnSl.'n l Decre e. I f 

## rn .,. < 0 then 

## m a " ,. 

### 0 O R I f Q . ,r 

### < 0111 1'" Qat
. 

### = 0


### St t'" 7 ; } : n' urr I h al d u ri n g n ary o 'K nl tio n . 

### '\11\ '" 

### >**~tl \'** **ejl** 

### Th e na rc mU!I1 

### be operated to ensure thai N Il V
.. i s equa l to or above**NIIV ,,**  

### t o ensure a c ccptab h: COfllbu stion effi ckncy
. l: quation 1 4**hu ws**  

### thi s relat ion sliip. 

### £ q ."'l i"" U

5 o f 1 0

### A PPt : :'Il l>l X 1 .3

Ol l"
.... , . __ .'...,.....
.. -<O l l**~_O. /"·_""**  3M3

.. •• "" • • 

### _I

... ,..,o'_h1**rf_** <\ltv ' ''''' (JM.S 

### K1 /1"'_) 

# A

..**"-,._~/~"** 

# .. - .... { _ , Inr ) /I. ,.."... . 1I ic<ftrJ**~:** 

# "H'.

_ II

. (_Jou) 

# c...-.. 

# , 'OC
.. , .... _ .,a(

..... )



### ... ......- -...- ,-.- _ , . ' uul ( -u lns) 

# 1·_......., 1 , ..- -""'
... 

### _J"'r

.... I {""' •• tn) 

# • . t_ ,,,"")**"""not-I..--~** »t '110 trL, • ........ 

## /"--11"_ , 0 ' ' '''''
.. ot ...... ' . , .... (M") /Jl '- ,lA 'N .""!)l'I
. .. " . , ...... . ,... (M. )

___ , ,_ , ... (!6/ IIr) 

# "'

_ _ ' ''' ozI flv. , o l" N,n><t"". d O N M S,U (Ib/"')

..... ... ..... _ o" I '". N "

_ U I low 

# , ..... ,**O.( Ib/** **')** "'. "
...... ". ",
. 01 •• , ".d , ..**d~.** ln mIo N.
......**<ur ""** **(Ib/~')**


### ..... , n "ldu
........ 

## tr ,.. • .., Ift 

### / "- ' or
...... , 

# ,n (Ib/II.-) 

# "'
.. " '1 _'· • • :." , I' d'"'0 ' (Ib/llrl 

### "'• • """" '" ."" 0 1 ' '''01 " ...... ( UI / Ior)

....... .... ,_ .... , . '" "' NI IflS (Iblltr) 

# "",
__ .. __ ..-,,"'-... '
.... /
.. _ .,.",...-1 .......,..- (_ / ltrl 

## .W
... _ .........**_' '.,** **_'** 

## ..**Z" /~4I'/)**  

# .W ." _to,**:~** 

# _,Ill.' /IOdIC'IC1
.... , .:;: /I (""'" 41'/) 

## IlfW • • " ,. ,,'• .....,.'

.....**'~h** 

## 4 ='_ _ _ ;**m'** 

## .W
.. . ......... 

## -rw.1 

# "'"l''''' (3 Z0 "/l)- OMI) 

## .w _ 

# " ,I, .--.-. _**,"' {2a'''/~**  41'/) 

## ."'
.. . ",""" , : --.....,,.,_(
..**->**

.... . -.... ..... .. . , __**(. /~**  41'/) 

# • . /ut. ,........."..,,_. II: , ... r_ ,"" ) I (_ " HY,. 

# Nlw. '

. .... -..'-_ ("tI /«/) 

# "

NY
. __ ,_...,.,. ;

. ( ntJ / « n 

# "N'

...... _ _ /WGt lNll<ll
.... .- _ .. -..**lr ,'.oout** **{rrrU /J**  "N'

.. _ _ I DIUt
..... -. ,"'" ",Iw**'"~** ,Ilor .-bo<n

__ (rrr U /kn NHY
.. - 

# - ' /Nf - " fHl oI IOU ( ff ttl /Kn NHY 

# - /Nf

.. _ "' ' l lU ( ffttl/ •• 

# n p

.. - "' ",

.......... ,, "" lID (p". j '
... ..**""'"..~.** ",..
.. "" . , "'"
...... d l l " .... ( 14,6% ''' I ' 11< •**lvl** (IJ "' I'O"Nd**""' ""** **/. ""'** **'''' I~**  ,110 1 'G ' ( .." , . ..... 

### ,DI1 J Q
_ _ " • • , _ 

# '.'GI ", '"",,, ..., ........ . ", G I. '"'rod • ....,.". .N "' S I S (
...**,~** Q**"GI, '-frlC** **'"** 

## ",, "_ " r (1

_ ( <W**,~** , 

# "'Cu'_l Q

• . . .... . .... . , ' ,........"**_lTV** (1_ { 

# Q. _. _"""" ,"" "-. M 

# '. 1< (1**"/ ~')**  - Q

.. • . .. 

# ...,IU
_ .,.,......,_ ""'-frIC (lew 

### I 'Ao
_ ...**{" '~**  Q.
- 

## _,u ""'-trrr ( lew**,, 1t'** **Jr '~**  Q", .,rWoC,a " t

.... 

# , Iew
.... ,. (
.. 

# '_l Q (_ tr (
.. / Ir) Q • 

### zmr(_" '(Jr/_) t



# . .. '''--''_1 11'"/''
. ,.." ..- _ ' IJ 

# '

.. - - ' '' ••• .• , ---IG(""

,_ - " • , "lIIu(Slrlj 

# "

. _.f ,.... _,I t:.H. { ,..,.., "

-

__ co 

# 9' 0lIl_,

.... _ __ ("",

..... _ , 

# "'

.. _ ...... . IboI<,-.. •• ""'-,

_ _,..(""(

....... 1 

# .P

.. .. - ""'- ( nIet,
.... , ,..,.,.. _ 

# {NI '

.... _1

, ......... ( _""'-'< pn -.I •• , C oH. (_ /-..1)

6 

## o r 10

## A P I 't :N IlI X 1.3**Ta bl**  

### I Illd i\ 'idulI l C o m lXlu n d Pr o Pfrti f ' 

### I" J Cu m l"'u nd



# , I H >dtogo n 

# z · 

# '" '" 1 

### · 

# i'" , · C 1 

### · CO 

# • 

# , M oth,," " 

# , , E th a n. 

# • • Fth lon e 

# • s ro 

### s 

# " 

# , 

# ""**,~** 

### u 

# •**Iso- ~to**  

### u 

# • n- ll"'
.... . 

# .. to i
.... 8u !cTJ
. 

### u 

# " uan ... nul on . 

# " u ci.. BulOTl< 

# " n I ] · B utod ione t s 

# .. f'l: n,,!!,o + C , + I 

# " · Wa ,o 

# -, H40t 121 2'"



## o o o 

# "
. 

# .. . 1 5' n 1 477 

# , ,, " " " 2 1S 0 2 957 

# " " 2 928 2 82 6 2 830 2 690 ] 655 

# , 0

## :n 

# " "**O2** 0. 040 32. 00 

# • 2 8 .lI l 

# • 4 4 .lI l 

# • 2 8,lIl lI
. 125 1 6
. 04 lI , 050 3 0.0 7 0030 

## no s 0 ,027 2 6 ,04 002 ' 4 4 , 10 0,021 4 2. 0 8 0.02 4 5 8 .12 lI ,0 18**8,** 11 0 ,018 56 .11 lI, OIB 5 6 .1 1 00 1 7**6,** II 0 , 0 16 5 4 , 0 9 0, 020 72. 15 (1,01 4 IB ,0 2 

# • C
. 

### H
. u 

# , no'
. n il 

# •• 

# ., 

# . , . , no'. 

# ..

, • z 

# • 

# , , z 

# , , • a e 

# • ro 

# • r c 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • e 

## s u 

# . , n , ' a I hll < "'"I'O "n,h
.**1ll** < "," p"" " , h ond**hy dTO** **en**

, Jf

.. .., fl ;.-1 ,." «l N fl V"....,**~ltV** ... I
..... "'" 12 1Z a n J i >ef ro.**hy dro** **,,,**

, II OC d""
. "'>l 

# n "",, " ,, "..... I f " 01 ", ;. ",,,,",,, 1«1 

# ""'0" o f

_ >lh ", In"
.. ""."" l he propon, .. of "
..... I , ;ml In th i s "",,
..... 11 II<: u.N N"", : lI <o",n< "",,, " qu, .... 10 b< ' PO< ' !llOd by ,he Gao { ' hromat "i'"'l' h I ", ' h" " nn"'l' "," Iomenl (,

... i\pr<Il d
.. 1.9 ) h<:c .- b", urno I> pro .... l itlll>o V .n ' Go> on ly 1 0 Jr .'", mi, q "",, 'i1 i
... lJ-eclUJ

.. b<ru<:"" <po< ,;uion I, no< It<l n j ro<l i ' is 001 H

<kd in T ""I. lo f thi , lIpprndi ', 11><: V "' , " " sc ""' l""' " iof1 in ,o l,," , 

# . " "lI<f f u'. ", "" ' I <meIllS
. ""'-tld b< •• w u ol«! on • < ... . by..,
... h ", i
. '" d< ' onni"" i f 

# """ Hr>< <p«101 K>n

....... I d II<: '"'I " 'red

7 o fl O

### APPE NUIX 

### 1.3

TaM e 2 

### C ombustion EfI k icnn '**Mu lf** **ipliH~** f ur**Stc~ m-** **A~~ isk**  fl ar e' ;**Vll ia** **lc** Ila w d 

### o n Min imum S lea m**C!luir elllenl**  lind 

### V OC Cone cnlrll l inn 

### in the Ve n l 

### G II S**~lil1im um**  

### V OC Venl**(;a** 

### A M ull i l il · r B Mulli Ii er '" SIUlQ C uocelli ra li"" Cond il ion X Condi lion Y 5 lOOO IM r 

### < 2(). 0% 6, 4 5 4 .0 0.0 

### < 1O\)(J Ib, 11r 

### > 20,0 % 6
. 85 4
. 0 0
. 0 

### > 

### 10 00 lh'hr ::; 2 0 , 0 % 7 ,1 4.0 0 .0 

### > 1000 I bIhr > 20 .0% 

### 7.4 4.0 0 .0 • m . B M ulli" l i... u,cd d cpend s on t h e re laliumhip of h ydrogcn and propyl""
. in Ih
. v . m vu as fo lio ,", " Co ndition X , J**tl** 8 "" d P r "p y l ctk. ,"", (a ll**"" (;l~**  aR' vo lume P1' mo le pcnm tag ",j Co n di

l ion Y : A n)
. " n di

t ' ''" nO! mMin ! Ih e rc quiTmlm " for C ond i tion X
. Note : 

### T h c specificatio ns 

### lo r C ondition 

### X are base d on 

### the best i nformation availa ble 

### a s 0 1 

### the D ate of L od gi n g . l f'ncw i n fbrmaticn becomes av ailable th ereaf ler
. the pan ics m ay m odif y these co nditio ns : MY ' s u c h modi 

### flcanc n does n ot co nstitute II m aterial modi fi cation t u t he Conse nt De cr e e. 

### Th e**OC** 

### V e n t Gas Co ncentration " shall 

### be c alcu lated on 

### an ann ual e vcra g ... basi s as 

### fo llo ws: 

## • C

V I 

### = 

# , 

# L

- , z' J' 1 00 E qulllion IS NOlo, Ihc S u mm. l , o n <k>e
. " 01 , nd udo melh. nc or c l h
. ""

8 

## or 10

### APPENIJIX 1.3

Addendum A \' er ificlilion o f**uu ltli** **"p ~.**  

### lin d Egu lt li" p**~b** 

### E guil '
. l con In I hi s Appe ndix , a ll ga ....u u s n o"," , (i. e, ve n t g a s.**te am.**  

### p i lu t g as. a nd air ) rn a> ' 

### be: me asured on either a mass bas i s (lb.'hr ) o r II 

### v olu metric bas is ( se r h)
. De p.:TlIl ing on w hich**m~~urcmrnl** 

### methodology i s used
. 

### differe n t version s o f so me equati ons m u.'1 be 

### uso. -.J Th ese vers ions lIIl: 

### desig nated with a n " a" o r 

### "b" ( e.ll. Eq uation S a o r S b). 

### I n all 

### ca ses. th ese equa l i ons 

### arc e quivalent. This A ddendum dem onstrates 

### the equivale nce of 

### t he IW U**elhod.** 

### for calcula lin ll 

### NlWC l. Eq uation Sb 

### u .... s volume t ri c flow ra t es 

### f or t he 

### calculation of "' ''V
.. :

The i deal gas law p rov i des a method f or determining volumetri c now rate of a s peci fic ga s. k In 

### the c ombustion zo ne 

### a t s tandard cond itions :

"'. -to ,73 ' 528 

## m . Q

. '"' 

# ""w • • 14 , 696 '"' 385.5 NW
. 

### S ubsl it utiun o f thi s l.'ll pR'Ssion inlU E qua tion 

### Sb giv es 

### N II V" in t e ons 

### of mas s now :

## (38S,S~**II .,** **)-+( 3BS** **'NH** •• ) N II V ", " , , 

### ill "

### 3BS**.5~** -+

### .5~ -+

### 38!>.5~ + 385,5 

# .. " " ." 

# ... Bec ause the c ombustio n zone i s well-mixed , e ac h g a seou s 

### co mponent of the c omb ustion LI m e 

### i s at t he s ame t em pe ra t ure a nd pressure . Thu s . th e las t e xpres sion reduc es t o Eq uat iun S a:

9 01'10

### Th i s d emonstrate s the eq uivalence ofE q ualiuns S a 

### and Sb
.

10 o f 1 0

### U N I T E D S TA TE S 

# ' 

# .

. H

ARA TII V .... 

### P I:.TR OH l'JI 

### C O
. \l P A , V r



## AIJII E NIH CES TO C ONSENT DE CR EE



# APPENDIX 1.4

EP A'S POLI CY ON EX CES S EMI S SIO NS D URI NG

MALF UN CTIONS, START UP, A ND S HUT DOWN

## APPEMllX 1.4 I'OUCY O Jol 

### ueau KM tsS lO 1l5 DlJR l Nl:l MAI.J'\IH CTI0HS. S'l'A R'lVP, 

### loN e**,,~** I nt n ''':.l '' t ! on T h! . po licy .pecI C ie. w hen .nd in**ha** .. nner .t ete**!~ leeenta** **tion** p la na lS I P. l**~ay** p rovi de for do f e n ••• t o v io la" Icna "a u •• d by per loda 0= e xceea eoda.lona dua t o IULl functlona.' at . r t up . o r . hutdown
. Oenera l l y
. alnc •• IP • .u.t pro v ide f o r e t t a l nma nt and "lnt.nan"a n f the n. t l ona l**ont** .I r qu ality e=anderda**ar~** the
. chlevoment of ,SO l ncr " on t.,
. 11 periodl of ex : ••• •• I •• ! ona au.t**~id. r.**  vl o l.tiona
. Accord ing ly • • ny p r ov l
. i on t ha t a llow . f or an .uta.a ,,! c .x","ptlon' f o r e xc e.a ... llelOI>l 1. proh lbit. d
. Powever . t he l.,o.it loo of a p . nalty f or e xc ••• esl •• 1 o n. dur ing •• U unc t u,., .. ", ,"un d by " hOWl,,,,,. n,,ea .n U
.... I y beyo nd U,
. cont r "l ot the o wna r o r operator**~y** n ot apprqprla te . 9ta t.a lULy , thl .... ( on • • • an o ". rch
.. 

## "r tha lr In he r. nt e n t or ce ment dia c ra C lon , ch ao • • not t o pe n al l z• • aaurel Chat hal p r odu c ed .xc • • • • • 1,,1 011I under a uc h c1 r eu c ll an ce • • Tb ia po l l"y p rov l da l an . It
.. rnatl¥l appr oa ch C o an Cor"a-ent di.c retlon tor . r •••• nd**pollu t~t.**  

### wh
.. r .. Ch. reapecti ve cvot ri bu tlon. o f I nd i v i d ua l .au rc .. a t o po l lutant co nce n t r . tio nl 14 a mb l
.. n t air a rl auc h tba t 

### no l in gl •• aurc . e r amall o f**e~ ce** **~~.** th .. po tential to Ceu a • • n e xce edan ce of the**N~OS** o r PSD i nc r ement . . Where a . Ing le**e~** er amall**eup** Of aourcel ha. C he po tent l. 1 t o c.u •• an . xca ed ence ef tb e 

### NAAOS Or PSO I ncr em e nt a • • • J. of t en t n. c ••• r or**.~ ltur**  diox ide end l . a d.' IP A ""'lI
.. v e • • ppr .... ch
... eth er t. ha " e n! o .-.; '...... hl dil cre tl on • •• not .p prQPtt.te
. In
. u ch c ..... . an y . xc e •• emi •• ien l ae y h . ve a 11 g nill o. nt chan ce o r**a~ .ing**  an I x c . e dan ce er Y l0 l . t lo n o! t n. .pp li cabl e . t.andard or PSD in cre ment .**'~** I X" " , m ill i e ; mean . a •• 1 r aml. ,lon l evel Wh ic h

.. x ce ed
. I ny .ppl icabl e em il .lon ll .,tatl on . Mi l functio n m . ane • l udde n a nd u navo i d ab le**bre down**  o f**oc** o r c ont ro l eqU ipment
. >rh.. t ane . ut p mo t i s .xcm&t ;qn .eane • g en e r. lly a pp l i c ab l e p ravi.i on In • SlP that WQUld provide t ba t if c e r t l JO co nd. t l one e x ! . t ..d du r1ng • pe riod o f
. x ce ••**~i** • • i on a. then tboa. e xeee denc e, wo uld nOt be COOI l d. r. d violat.ion • . 'T h h po licy .1 10 doe. no t . PJlly ( or purp o •• • 

### ot Pl'l2 . S NA.'>09
. 10 Mer ican T 1'\Ic kl n <J ".aocl.Uon v . "fA , 1 15 r . Jd 1 02' ( O.C
. Ci re., 1 " '1, tho c ou r t • ..and.d t.b e PM2 .S NAAOS t o the t P A. T he Ag.. ncy hal not. de t ene ined w he t b. r thi. polley 1. appropr iat e f er**~2** NAAOB.

### API'[:\I)IX 1.-1



# - 

# ,**~e. pt**  w her e •• I ng l . ,oure . or ' mAll i rouP ot .ou ree. ha
. t h e potentia l t o eaut. en**e.e dane.**  o t th e**N~** Or PS P i ee r emen t ., .t a t. , .. y**inelu~.** In t h.l r a1P,**attl~t lva**  d.t.n ••• • t or . xce ••• • • lon. , •• long • • th e 

### a t' .'t.bll.he
. 11
. U
. a t l on. co n.i u.nt w ith tho
.. fft OUt below
. 11 .ppr ov .. <1 1 n to • SIP , an . t t lrsat i v.**~t.n** 

### ••**wo~ld** be**.va1 1~1.**  t o . ou r e •• I n .n e nf or c .Man t ac t ion • • •**~lng** pe n.lti • •**rQ~ ght**  by the ,ta t ., !PA
. O r c: H I . tl na. Ho
.... v .. r . a d. t .... ln. tlon by t h
... t a t , n<:lt to t . k • • n**.nt orc~** **ant** .et loo would not b ar .?A o r ci t't . n 'Ct! Oe
. ' In ' ddi t l on, i n**ae rt.~**  II . i t . d c l rcum .tane e . , i t .ay be appr opr l a t. t or the**~tata** to buil d in t o •**~C:. 'P** **cifle** o • •**ourc:.·e .t.iory** **·~ci lc:**  .-l,.ion**.t .n~r**  e prov i. lo n .t. t lng th a t tho o th or wl ee applicab l . ee i •• l on 1 1. lt . t , o n . not .pp l y d ur in g na rr ow l y**~t in9d**  .t. rt up and
. hu td own p a r IOd•
. 1

. A ll'f'[)MA TI C**Ii:U MPT** **~S A.~D** **Irn ro** **C'F. IlNT**  D18arTIOfl It a S I P c on t . ln . , prov l, i on**a, ' ng**  . x c.s, • • I .a lo n.. , It canno t be the t ype t h. t p rovIde
. fa
.**t~ tlc**  .x.mpt,an e . Aut oa.ti c:**io** lght .gg r.va t • • ;Oiant al r qu .lity by

.. eu 'i ng . xe e •• eml 1 on. that ca YCe O
.**c:on~ .l** **but** to a vl c l.tl on o r an aabient aIr quel1ty .t.nd.r d .**~<ld io**  .. l g round. t o. 4 1 •• pp rovlng a SIP t hat I nd lld • • t bB a .,t .. "tl e . ". " puo " .pproa ch ara**dl. c~.sed**  ln**~r.** d.t. l l
. t 4 2 

## r . j. Re g. 5 81 7 1 ( NOVeabe r I , 19" ) and 4 2 r .. d. Ileg
. ll J H ( Apr 11 n , n n l . "'. r •• u l t , n" w

i ll not .pprove any £1 1' r a vi . i ona that provid e .u toaati e ex e mpti on.. l or period
. of e .C
. . . .. I •• I on •. Th e be.t a •• u ran Of tha t o xce ••• • • l one w i l l not lnt.r t . r. w

i t h llAAQS at taln.a nt , .. tll ton .ne., o r IntrD.en t. 

### t . t o . d4
...... ""'e ,,ae eata' l one t h ro " gh e nf or cell en t c H , e r. t lo n. Tb l. poll ey p rovl<le. a lt.rnatlv.**~.n** t or " d dt.a. lng
. xc •••**~l** •• ion. o t c ri teria po ll"t .n t •. Howev" r , thi. po licy doea n ot appl y wh ar •• • 1 ng l e aO\l r c. O r**~all** group o f eour ce. he. the potont l. 1 t o c . u •• an e xc a. da nce o r t h.. N AAQ S or P SP l ne r . se n t o. Mor eov er , "T h. t Orlll "U a lth

. 4ftap"
.. .. n •• 1n t ha conte ",t o f e n D

n to rc ene nt pr ocee d ing . a r .. . por d O o r delen •• put t orw .r<l by • de te nd. n t. reg .rd ing w hiCh the d. fe nda nt he. the bu rdan of pr oof
. a nd the ee r lt
. ot w hl c:b .r a i nd. pe ndent l y and o b je c tl va l y " " . J ut t . d h, • ju di ci a l o r .d-t lll.tr. t ive proc ".<1l "g
. 

## ' R

.c." • • • 1 1 pe ri od. 0 1 . xce •• e llt ..
. lo n • • r a v l o l. t i o n . an d**be ca~**  ••**tel~a ti¥f**  <1.I ."a
. p r ovis io n . lI ay not app l y in
. c tl on . l or I n j unc t i ve r . ltet , under no**ir um.tan**  w oul d I'" cons i da . porl od. ot 'X CD" .ad •• lona , e V ." i t c overed b y an**"fll~ tiV**  Of t.n .. e , to be ·f .derally p or " l t t ed r el •• •• • • un der IPC RA or crR CtA
.

## A I' PENIJIX 1 .4



# , - notnlna in thle**dAnc, ho~ld** **eonet~Dd** ••**irtng** St et ea to i nc l ude**.tt r~ti**  d e f enee provlaion
. I n thai r SI Fa
. 11

. APl'l """T IVI IlII"lrn S!S FOR JllAL FUJl CTI OM S T h e IPA o an epp r 0V8 • S I' r ev ial on th.t or e. tea e n ' f flrma tiva de fe n •• t o c l a i . a f or pe n. l t 1e a In**nt o.** **oe~ en**  .o tio n a**e~ardln** ex o .a ••• I aa l on a**ea~ ed**  by m' l t unet i o na .a l onq 'a the de t en • • doe
. n oc .pp l y to I I '**ro vl** **.~ on**  t hat derive**f~** t ede.ally p r QM ul ga tDd**par fo~~**  a t anda rd a o r**e~ la** **on** limita • •**~ch** "
. n ev ao" rc. pedoraanc e at&ll da .da l NSPSl

. nd
... t i ona l • • b d ona atao <LII. r da for ll. u ar Qoua d r po ll" t."t
. I N I Sl to\ PSI. ' :n a ddi t ion , .I flra a ti ve d e l e n .. a e re n ot a ppro pri ate lor •••••• nd po l lut .n ta w he r e a . ingl. ' QU r C' 0' .m al l**gr~~** o f**aour~.** Il.a, t h e po ten t ial t o c .... e a n , xe_ <LII.nc a o f t he K.VoQ S Or PSI) Inc r ... n te. ru tt h erao r e • • deta n a. a to " lal ma 10 '**~c** reI i e ' a r a n ot . llow e d . TO be
. pp r ovDd .• n**'fl ve**  dele
... a pr ov ia ion ." at p rov ide t ha t t he**def en~**  h a a th e burdan o f p roof of**de~natr.tin** t ha t , 1
. The ,x ce a •• m la.lonl**we~** 

## "."Ied by • ludden,**un voi** **~l, bc** **ak o~**  O

f**e,,~logy,** beyond t he c ont r o l of the owne r o r ope r.to r , 2
. The e .oftfta ft aiallonft t • •**ld** no t**e~** f r oe any a c tiV I ty or e ven t t ha t**co** h l v l bae n !o reae en a nd**evo ~e** **d,** o r p lana.d for ,**n~** ( bJ co ul d DOt have baen a vo l dftd by be tt er over at lon and

.. lnten a nce pr a cti ce e , 3
. t he**axl.u.** , . t e n t pr a ct i cab l e**~h** .l r po l lu t i on con t ro l equ tpae nt o r p l oee aeue we<o**~I nt.** **'ne** I ud**ope ra**  .n • manne, cona.atent**vit** i0ad praOt lc O fo r**~inl.i.lng e~** **l.llo ne**  e . Repal
....... re .. <:1o in a n e""ed l tl""e la.b lon
.. :W n**~h** oper.t or kne v 0.. ehoul d h ave kn own t n. t app l icable emi.aion il el ta tl ona we.. e being**xc oe** **de** O f f· ah i r t tabo r and overt ime .u s t have be en ut llired. t o the e x tent pr, e tl c&ble , t o enau'e th.t a ach r e pai r , .. or e made .a exped ltl oua ly a'**p,actle~le,** $

. Tha**a~ un**  and durat Ion Of the ,xceaa**il .i**  ... «

i nc l ud i n g . ny hyp • • , ) .are .Ini.l red to the na ., mum e et en t pr a cticab le d ur in g pe rlodl of e uch**e~i'l ionl'** 
' TO 

## t"" e x ten t I Ste te lndu del NS i> S 01: N &SIIAi' S In ite Ili'
. t he a tan d- rde ehould not deYI.te fr om th ooe tb et**~re** t e d e r a l l y p 'OIR ul g.ted. Be",u_ EPA eet the
.. etan d.ar ds t a k i ng ln to loco unt t echno l og i c
. I li.ltat io na , a dd i t i o na l e xempt ion. would be In .p propr-Iate
.

## APPf::"oiIllX 1 .4



## - 

# . -

, . All po l bl e
.. te p ... r . tal e" t o**.1n ~1~e**  t ne**lup a~t**  of tbe
.. ...... i on.. on .. Mblent a Ir quality; 7. All**~l** ... ian**~nitorin~** 

### .y .. t .. 

### me we r .. ke pt in op .. r a ti on U

.. t aU po.alb )
.. ;
e. The owner O r ope retor'
. ac tion
.. I n r e .. pone e to th
..**~gell** e . i ..
.. lo n. w e re**en** by p r oper l Y "I gne d,**~o MPO** **neou** opar a tin S' 1 098, o r o tb a . rel"v a nt**den~",** The**,,** .... . halo"
.. wer.. n ot poort o r I re cu r rtn S'**p&~ te** **rn ndl~** **ve** o f in.dequ. t e de
.. l gn. oper.t ion . o r m&lnt
.. n ..**n~e** and 1 0 . T h. owne r o r ope r a to r p rop er ly an d**pr ~p**  no ti f i. d tho .pp r op r l. t .**atory .~t** **ori t y**  Th

.. ti PA I n t. rp r e t .. t b
... .**~r:owly** O n l y tho.e M

al fun c ti o "" that ar . ..**ud~** u na voi da b l., and un pr ..d lc tahl e In**at re**  qWl : U y t or U ,e dar
.. " a... "o r .. . a lllpln , • "I"g l
.. I nn an ge o f a bur.t pi p .. t hat
... t . t ne .bove e ri t e r l .**~y** qu a l ify u nd .. r an ..: fl
... t,,,,, del. ". a . T b. deren ..e wou ld no t b8 a vail abl e,**hc ""** **r,** i f f
. c i l i t y ha d .. bi" tory 

### o t " l nll a . t a i l ur a . blcl u" e o r**rope** d . " l gn, IMP rope. M ai nt e n an c e , o r poor op er a tin\l pr lc dge.
. P'urttlo rmore, ... =r c .. .... " t have t alt an a U a va tlabl
.**.,,~e.** t o c am pe n .. 

# " e .. l or a nd t e e o l ve tn o .. lfun ct l on . I f a fa c i l it y had a**~\lh .e**  t i r e tha t lea d. t o**~c** • •• emi " .i one , t he ef t1e.& ti ve detenee w ou l d be appr o pri at e only ( or the p er i od o r t i
.. ,,- c.u er;- t C IIl<;l dify or c urt ail opera t i ona to <:ome i nt o**~lia c..**  Th e r ire ehou ld n ot be**.e~** to .. . 

### eu .. ex c • ••

.. 1 ."ion
.. g . ... r.t.d du r ing an**tendld** pert od or**ti~** w h i le the operet or o r do r. e nd t n" t a ll . n ew bag

. ... nd r.l ev ant**lan9Ue~.** euet l im it Ippli oahi lity o r the**lf i~.** **tlv ~f** **.nee ~c** **or dlnglr,**  1: 1. KXCE9B £M IBs rO NS DOR:NG**T~TDP** AND SHUTDOWN In genera l , e ta.r tup a.n4**.h~tdawn** o r proc .. . e .qu lp"'ent a re par t o r t he n OrmAl op e r a t to n of e aour ce en d
.. bould b e**.cco un** **te** t or I n the p l a nni ng , d1 1 1S' '' , an d iep l ament" t ion or ope retlng pr oc edure. ror t he p roc •• , and c ontro l . qul p me nt . A oco rding ly , it I ' r e a" on ab le t o e xpec t th a t cdr a ru l . nd pru d ent pl an ning .nd de 81gb W il l el i m inat e v i ol etl Qn8 o f
. ml a.ion**etl on**  dur i ng ..uc h p er i O<1e
. A
. S Olll1C I CA TIIJOf.l' S PEC IFI C RtiLBS PO R S TMl:roP ,\)I l) S IWTDOWII F or .... dou re e cat e gori • • , \l Iv en t he t ype . o r cont rol tec hno lo g! • • ava i labl e , t h etl m ay e.l
.. t " ho rt petlO<1e o r

... i . e lon. during etertup a nd .hut dQwn wh en . deep l t e bl et ett o rt . r eg a rdtn\l plann i,,\! , deelgn , "nd o pe r at ing**pr oced** **~a** tb e

## A I'I ' EN IlI X 1.4



# - 

# . . o t he rv l • • •**pplt .bl** **e~ !.** **lon** I t. l t. tlon**c. ot**  be .et . Ac COrdingly • •**cep** I n the c .se whe r e a al ng . e .o ur ce o r**a~ll ~p**  o r sOUrC •• ha
. the po t entl
. l t o c aus e an**~e-.Q ~CO**  o t t he I(MQ S o r P SP I n<:> r ... e l1 ta, it " ay be a pp r o pr la t •• I n co na un at loo With &I> A. to na r rowly-r allo re d SI P**vl.i~** that**t.~** t he • • te ch nol09l ca l**~j t.tl** **na** 1n:o**ac c~t**  an Q . ta t a tha t th e ot he rwla
. a p pllc abl . e llla . l ona 1 1.,ltatl oo. Q o n ot appl y Q ur. ng na r r owly**de~ln Cl**  ft u·tup aAd; a but dg,<n pe riod a . To b
. appr ova Cl
. thea. r e vl a , on •• houl d ea et the l ol l owln g**raqu lra~n**  1. TII a re v l a l "..
.... t be 11.. I . e Cl t o "'pe c 1t l c . n a no wly -**~lo eCl**  aou r ee**a~go** u.t D9**peC I~lc**  contr o l
. tra t . gl . a Ie.;. , c oge ne ratlan t .cille l a . burnl nq n a t u ra l g a. ao d uetn q • • l.c t lv
. c.t a l yt lc r educ t . on) , Va. of t he co ntrol a tr. tegy r or t hl a e QU r c. c at. gor y lIuat be**t.dbnl~.ll** tn te a. tbl. d u ri ng .tartup o r anu t down peri oda ) J
. The**tr~~n ~y**  an Cl Qu ra t l On o f oper.ti on I n . t a rtup or**~utdown** -.d. lIuat be**~l.n** .. tr .. d t o tbe lI .,.i ll
.... x t . nt pr ac ti cab l . , (
. par t o t I t ' ju.t l flc. t lo n o t t h
.. 

## st. r av I . l on
. t he

. t at e . haul d a naly ra t he pote nt i .l wor .t
- ca . a a rni .alona tha t c ou l d oc cu r d ur i ng . t.rtup and ahu tdown , All po •• l b l • • tep.**~~at** be**a~ en**  to**~ln i.l,**  t he im pac t Qf
. " l . a i on e**~urtng** . t. rtup and**hutdo~n** o n**L~ ;an**  a l.t qual1ty , 6
. a l l t 1• ••• f Ac ility**.t** be**opor a~d**  1 n a .. nner co n aia te n t w i tb good p ra c t 1 ce to r .. l nl m l,I. Dq e •• •• ien.
. a nd the aourCe m uat ua ..d be.t attor t, rag ardln g pl a nni ng . de . l gn , an d ope rati ng pr oceClu ra. to . eet the otbe rw la. a pplicAble _la el"" 11. 1tation, and 1. Th. _r .. t or**op '.**  a<:tlon. during a t ar t up a n Cl .Ilutdown P U I OlU l!U at do cu ment ad by proper ly d gne d, ront •• poraneoue oper at i ng log •• or otha r ralevan t av i aenc
.. . B
. OENEilIlJ. .o.rfl R MA l'IV E :l!f DlS Ii: I> ROV18IONS Rl:.A TWO rc ST.u. 'lV1' AM P !I l1ln' lXlWlI'
a dd l t too t o t he
. pp r oa ch ou tlIne d 1n Se c tio n lI lA)**abo~** St a t ee .ay a eldr.aa th a p robl
.. . o f eKC ' •• e. i • • "Ccurtin g du r 1"", .t a r tup a nd Ilh u t&nm**~rtod,"** thr ough an . nfo rc .... nt dI.cration a pproach
. Pu rth. r , ex cept In the ea. a w h er e a a1ngl. aOu rc e o r . ... 1 1 group or . our ee a has PQt en t l.1 t o ca u •• an .xc e ed Ance o f tbe**AA09** or I'sD**lne ra~** **nt a,**  St at •• • • y alao aClopl r O t thel
. !Iip e a o ar flrll&tlve de t en.e ap pr oa ch . 

### U . l ng t h l .

# • •**'PP'~Ch.** 

### , II pe . laa. 

### or 

# , .e- •• .. l, .ions**1. n,**  

### durlD9**~.r~up** and**h~; Oo_**  n be t
.... . . <l

.. ¥1 01. tI
...... and eM**t1 '"** 

... 1

..... p .cw l.t t IlG t tie**.".U** •• 1 o. ,,1 11_ fo r 1 Il:lWlCU_
•• llel
. r".r ..he ...., •• • to tie**.pp~** .... ctl

..**provi.~o"** ... : .,.-_1. tbat ebol ..,le_t bill UM wr"'" o f proot o r 4e
..... tr .tl<>g Uwt : 1.**~.** 

### pe riod. o t IXce
.... i •• lea.**t~ .t** **o~~ rr.d**  dur l ,., etlHIIF and 

### .:.ut
_ _ abort and i

.. h-
.. ........ e:>d
...... 1d QQt**~_** tie
...**p~,"nt..,** t""""'9" ".r,f,,1 1'1
..... 11".1 e nd 

# .,. .i p , 2
. The ....,. •• _1 •• 1_
_ n<K pol", :> t
.. 

### r.ev .... ll>9 patten 1 "<U ,,. u ... of l
..... qo ..... d
... 19" , CIpfI.lt1on
. or _lilt

...... ". , J
. 

### If the , .. " ••••• i ••**lo~** 

### _ •• 0
...... 4
.. b yp • • • I nt . " . l o _ l d l "" u l on o r co ntl"Ol**It'qUI~ ntl**  the
.. . hoI hype
.. _. """'
..... ld.<obl. to pr ..... n t 1 0 " of h Ie, pe.lOO_ l In!" .y. o r ......... p.optI n y**~.",** 

### At III t \ • • • • 

### f' ''1 1 1 t y we . opat. ted I n .... conlte.ent w i t h 9 004 pr a., tice 

### ror el nl ml zl"9 I. i • • tonl , 5
. The**nc** e nd du r at i on o f oper at l on in a taftu p o r .h\l t 40 ""



# _ Od.

_ . _1.ulIl h e c1 to the •• ........ n ellt p ra ct i catlh , 6
. All poa .t b le
. tepa**re** t aka" to

_ inl_1 r e t he IlIlP8ct ot the eaC .a. e _ l a. i on . on .ab Ient .ir qua l i t y, -r

, All _he Ion
.... Jtorlnq aye . __ n It'''F t In operatio n It 

## .t

. 11 po • • l bl
. , 

### I
. Tb e """lO r 0' _rato , '. artlol'l. 

### cs...nnv tbe pe riod o t ee Ca
.. eIIl1 • • io:w _rIO d<x'_tH by pnopto rly**.I~** ClO nt.-po ...... 

### w. _n.U"9 109. , 0 ' othe r 

# , ,. 1 ..., •• evide...,. , a.lld t . n>e _ , 

## = gpent o, propoor ly aDd p.-.:IIIlP tIy no tt U H**t~** .PP'OPrl. te**1.to ry** **a~tbor l.y**  It 

### e_ •• •• h

... d\&flnt rou ti_ 

### e •• r1:'4' 

### or .""'._ period. dl,;e to • _U""'rtl0Il, tUII til i""t.= •• _Id be**ted** .. otn.. _It

.... ctl_ t .... t u.bjoct to tbe _lh,=w:tlor. pr_hlQIOOI o t tbh poll")'
. l l . r . " "" e 'art I abo
.... l
.V,\ ITf :D S 1 A 1 E S 

# , .

.**HR. TH** **"\** 

### P £TR OI. f.. ·l 'M CO.HPA ,' V} "



## A I) IIEN IJICES T O C ONSENT D ECREE



# APPENDIX 1.5

CA LC ULAT ING MOME NT UM F LU X R ATIO

### A PPF.NIlI X 1. 5
C AI. Cl I L, H r 'lo (; 'IO' IENTl I" n .I I X RU IO

M omen tum Fl ux Ratio ( MFRI i s 1 1M: teladon ship bet wee n 

### t he: d ensity (P) a nd**'c1ocil** o f l he Ve nt 

### G ao; p lus C ente r St earn to lhe d ensit y and velocit y ofthc 

### wind
. It is defined in E quat i on I
. 

### MFR =

### p~ .. >.U

.. r 

# · II

. , .. ... . ..**I~** 2 P "'T '""'T Th e numerato r of 

### me f raction is t he "mom en tum flux " of ihe v em Gas plus 

### C e nter Steam a nd the denominator i s t he 

### " momenlu m Il ux " u f t h e air ( w irld)
. A s 11M: v e IO\: i t ) , 

# o r t he wi nll increase s. 

### th e M F R willdecline f or a g sv en V e n l Gas 

### comp ositio n and 11 0
.... rat e . C alcu l ations f o r the d ensit y (p) c om po nents 

### li nd v elc cl ty (v ) 

### componenl S a rc di sc ll s o;.cd sq'JiIllIh:l y bel ow . 

### Calcu lating U cn sih' 

### T he g ene r al fo rmula to c alcula te th e**d~ 'nsit**  o f an) ' gi ven ellmpu nen t lp ,) 

### at s tan da rd tem pe rature li nd pressure (6 8 O F, I a I m ) 

### i s show n in E quatio n 2
. 

### M W , ' P MW , ' 

### 14.696 

### p si MW I 

### P I 

## = = l 

## = R ·T
.. 

### o • 1 0 73 

### psi · I t • 

### ( 4 60 0" 

## + 68 0H) 

### l 8 S.S



## . Ulmar. O R F rom t he fi n al f orm o f b q u e tion 2 , the den sity of Ambien l Air (P d" I
. Vent (l a s (P , .J
. 

### li nd Ccnlcr Steam 

## 1.1 " " _) can 

### be calculated
. s hown in 

### Equat i on s 3, 4
. an d 5
. 

### MW "

.. 2 8.96 

### Ib Equal;o" 

### J 

### P" l' 

# = l 8S,S
.. J 8S
. S 

# = 0 .0 75 It S MW 

### Ib

. 1I f. 'qua l;'", .f 

### P. g '" 

### 3 85.5 ItS

M W H

, o 

### 1 8 .02 I b Equal ;on j 

### P

u ..,r 

## = 3 65.5

- 385 .5 ::: 0
. 0 4 7 I t l



### 10 0

## , \ PI·t : Nll IX 1 .5

The d ensity o f thl: V en t (las p lus C enh:t**SICltlTllp., .~**  __ 1is c alc ula ted b y c o m b in ing t he mas s 

### 11 0
.... IlI tcs ofthc Ven t 

### G u 

### lII\d C Clller St eam 

### 8I1d di
... i ding by t he c o mb ined vo l u met ri c n o .... ta l es o flhc Venl GlISllnd C enter Stearn
. Th is is shown i n E q uat i on 6
. rit v" 

## + rit , .c ", ' /;" yu a /;O/l 6

### m.**~,** 

## + m '.ee"1 fJ"" P u : ... '

r . I. ' u IM li n, \'

.. I OS lh T n" v elocity ofthe V en l Gas p lus Center Steam ()....
. ...-) is eaku lll ted by Equatio n 7
. 

### m",



### . 

## + 

# '" • . , .... , P

P, P u ", ' 

### Equa tio" 7 

### A

"I'

_ "n <>t>**Jb** 

### wind ve! vdty is m easured di rect ly.


### Co nstants : MW . " '" mo le",la' w eig ht »[ air

## (28.96~,) Ibmo M W " ,a = mUlero/Il' w d g ht ur W <l ler (18 .0Z

# /b~ol) MW I = molecula' w eig hl or rampanen ' I

## Cb~"/) p 00; ab.,a/ul e ambi..", preiSure (I <l.n p,'la)
P.
.. :dtnJllyaf<lir 

# ( f l



# <0 ' 

# )

- 0 .015 

# "
, / 1 P...... , '= 

## d""''''1 of Ce"1.... Steam 

# ( /I



# " )

I
.. 0.0 47 

## II ' 

# " P

." .'<') R 

### = g IU rmullln, 

# ( IO .n/bmo l . "R T
_ .. <Ibs olwl e , emper<l/w re ( O R) 

### = 4 60 " R ...**~8 'R**  .. 5 Z8 O R



### 2 0f 3

### APP[:'IriDiX 1.5

## ~w 

# - """Jnlldr
..... / 61 11 

### o! 

# V
.... I Cou ( Ib::"' )

rn U>'O • .. "' 

### J I" ... ro tr of 

## eln l" S ' n ", (: ) 

## m

., .. "' f lqw 

## r OI. o f V ." I c
..

## (~~)
Q

.. • """" ",,,,"", f'- r"tr 

### of V Al CoJ**(lC f~)** 



# ,,_ .. ... 1«l170 '''''''' 

# a;}

...,

f' R • ", o", .." IUm f l 1l.1I; r oU " (11 ,,1 ",") 

# ".._ u.u U)'O! V", IC

.. ( ;: 1)

PI

## d"'''!)'of~1**(,~.)**

...... Wlocll)' .' 

### v"., 

## c... 

# a;)

"
..... ""'Nell)'''! C ...u .... SI"""

# (~:)

J 

### o f3

### V NJTED 

# s TA 

## r s; 

# s '

.**~R** 

### TlIO

. ... · P ETR OLEl 'M C O

. UPA

_ \ T



## APP E NDI C ES TO C ONSENT n t: CR EE



# APPENDIX 1.6

C A LCU LAT IN G H IE UN O B ST RUC TE D C RO SS S EC TI ONAL A REA OF VA RIO US TY I'ES OF FLA RE T Il' S

## APPENDI X 1 .6 

## Type I LD T 

## Type l[ E m l ower S te a mlAl

. 

### T

u bes

# .D

I D ' T

Stabi ity Tab 

# p

, "" Stab' kty Ring

""'- Ste a n\lAir 

### T ubes



### A,,,.,,,,,,,, " 1T (I.D r

### ~f**4-(** " As,. ) 

# I W here :**~"Unobstructed** 

### Cross Section al Area of F lare TIp I D T 

### = I n sid e Diameter F lare TI p X , '" N umber o f Stability Tabs 

### Am" sc ea of a S tability T ab W he re : 

### A"p.""", " Unobstructed Cross Sedona l Are a o f Fla re T Ip ID T" Insde Diameter Flar e T ip 

## As, '" Area 01 Stabi lity RIng 

### AD ., "Outside D iam eter of Steam/Air T ubes N T" N umber 01 S leam/Au 

### Tubes E x ampl e , L D T = 4 1.S fr'l che s 

### X t " 

### 3 

## As , " 3 Sq inches 

### E xample. I D ., " 41 .5 mches 

## As, " 100 sc inches O

. D, = 6 5 inches 

### N,- " 8**1T 41**  5}'1 4

- ( 3 ·3)**34** 

### Sq tnceee " 1T ( 4 7,5)'14- 1 00·8 '11' ' (6
. 5)114 

## A,, _" 1 322 Sq 

### Inches

## AP PENDIX 1 .6 

## T

y

pe III T ype 

# llZ:
1 , 0 , y

... • ( TT · {I.D

. ... ) 1{ 4 

# - x , . 

# As-r l l , 10

.. 

# r--

Where : "\ ' '- '" Uno bstrucled Cross Sedional Ar ea 

### of Fla re Tip 1 0 .. : Insod e Dlameter of One T ip M odu le N .. " N um ber o f M od ule5 X

. '" N um ber of S fability Tabs per Module As r '" Area 01 a St ability Tab 

### E xample

. 10

. ... " 17 IIlches N .. = 6 X T = 3 A ST " 3 

### Sq inches



### A, ,,, ..-" 6 ' ( 'Tl"{ 17f214 - 3 ' 3 ) 

### 1\", ,,,,,,,, " 1308 Sq inches W here , 

### A...o....ot, ,, Unobs lrlicled Cross 

### Sectio nal Area of 

### Flare Ti p I D. , " Inside D iameter 0 1F lare T ip



### E xa mpl e : 10 ' 1" 41

. 5 i nches

A,

h _ 

# = " ( 41 5) 1/ 4

..... =13S3$q i nches( W IT ED S T. 4TES


# . ,

. ' H R A TU O. ' · PETROLE TJ I 

### C O , \l

p . -4 S r



## A I) I'EN IHC ES T O**O~SENT** 

## D ECR EE



# APPENDIX 1.7

D EPICTI ON OF GASES ASSOC IATE D W IT H STEAM·ASSISTE D FLA RES

# D EPI CTIO N OF G ASES A SSOCIATED WITH S TEAM-ASSISTED FLARE S OPERATIONAL H.U;l llAH}HY W AST E GASES 

## (;,\srs GASES 

### ANOSn :AM 

# I

• ., :-: . c • • ,

# ~:-:**:-:- ,,** **- - - - - - -** **- - L1**  

# ; .. · r.. I I 

# :-- /.. " I J 

### \ 1 I i 1 

### mm 

# t
-**YOC~1l«l** _hI

### .~ 4U - , ,"'" , "' , .. , "'

. 

# I

.... ", II n"'... 

# I ' sn ..... '"

,, \'1W I(
__ ....... 1fYllkO......... <'mlIII
..**,,** 

## II'"**""~** 

# I : ' 1 

# *'"

.. • I I 

### AA' I LI -: rnw.t 

# I

. .... I 

# I : ..., I

" GUR11IAT 

### -..r .. 

### u.onu.. · 

## I " M U ,," K'1**_~W"** __ + " CONIlUII1Ofl CA_ 

# .. I 

# ._ '.k
" DlIl'lFtorY
.... ..... "

-- , " I ' \ 

# \ 

# " 

# . . . . " \
.. 

# .. 

# '"

\

. "...,"

# ~,. C O /'li S t-: N T Il r.CR EE

,, " 1\YtlI:' • • '" ,,"Ill .""

.. _ - •• 

# , of.**H1** ' '' '

..... __ 

## In
. FI NITIOS S



# ,, 

# , "



# .. 

# '..

..... 

# -- - WASTE GAS " " " " " "



# .....

+.... ., ..... :,... - . 1ltt

__ of,JIJ _,**"... ""'**  .... -- 

# .,..... 0Il_

..... » » .. .... _, IU I<

... " 

### fl- fur ,. 

# r-,..- <If..,.....,.,



# .... .:. "


# .. "" 

# .. " 

# " " ;. - 

# *"Itt_ 

# - . . 

# ---- . . 

# _ .. 

# - 

# -,,- ... .....**I. ,,**  I'D, ro, _ .. li p .... _ .... _,,**_~** a.fII-

_ 

# ../ 

# ... <1 "- -"-- ,, VE NT GAS

--- " 1TII'

__ 0( <tII..-.jt>wtJ 

# ' 'I'" IIor 

### II- 1 '1' 

### nw. ... ' /Nt , "/ If_**,~** Gorr ,

. 'fwq> c;. -.J "- Gorr • 

### C O M U U ST I O N ZONE GAS
---


# ..... -J-ttiJWIIIfWr

# P P**EN DI**  

# 1.7 1 " rr. 

# -IJ/"

_ ". "... Up 1JIu
... _"
. .. .. lioa I'IIot 0... .-11_._ "

# •• ( I. '\"IT ED ST A T ES

. '1AR.-l TIIOS PETROL£:t'

. '1 C OJ ' P

. -l ,

,,"' y



## AI ' I'ENIlICES TO C ONSENT D E CR EE



# APPENDIX 1.8

OUT LINE O F R EQ UIR EMENTS FO R T ilE F LAR E DATA AN D I NI TI AL MONITO RING SYSTEMS R EP OR T

### APPENDIX I.K
OI 'TU .'F. OF RF.OrlKD1EN1 ) FOR TIlE**L. ~Rt**  

### IlA TA A:'IiD I:\'ITIAI.**~1ON T()RIN{**  S \, Sn ; MS 

### HU'O IU


### I. Fac ili ty-Wide 1
. 1 F acility plo t p lan showi ng the location of each fl are in re lation to 

### the l!e""ra1 p lant layout 

### 2
. G ener al Desc ript ion o f Flare 2
. 1 G ro u nd o r elevated 2 .2 Ty pe: of assist system 2 .3 

### Si mple Of l ntegrn tw 

## kg
. 5Cquen tiaJ
. staged) 2.4 Date fi rst in stalled 

### 2 .5 11 

### i story o f any p h y sical changes to the Fjere 

### 2.6 W hethe r the Flare i s 

### a T ffllPOrary-Use F lare
. and if 

### so . the d ur3lion and t ime 

### pe riod s o f 

### use 2 .1 F l an: G as R cw very System l" f G R S'
. if illl)'
. 

### and da te first installed 

### 3
. FIlm' C ompo nent s: Com plete descri ption o f e ach major componen t of 

### the 

### Flare , e xce pt the Flare Gas Reco very S ystem 

### \., t'e P art 5). 

### i nc l uding 

### b ut l'lO t limited to: 3, I F l are s tac k (f or elevated flllre5 ) 

### 3. 2 F l ar e t ip 3. 1
. 2
. 1 Da t e**;nst:at1~'tl** 

### 3
. 1 .2 .2 

### Manufactllm" 3. 1
. 2 .3 

### T ip 

### Size 3 .1.2 , 4 

### Ti p l >rawing 3 .3 K nockout 

### or sUflle drum(s ) o r 

### put ( s). inc luding dim ensions and des ig n capac ities 3. 4 Water se a l{s). itlCluding d imensl o lU and de sign param eters 

### 3 .5 

### Flare headc:f( s) 

### 3
. 6 Sweep GlIS sys t em 3 .7 Purg e**I!~** s) 's tem 

### 3. 8 Pi l o t gas s yste m 

### 3
. 9 Supplementalg as sys tem 3. 10 As sist S)S I <:m 

### 3
. 1 1 I g n i tio n s ys t e m 4
. Simp lified p roce ss d iag mm( 5) sh owing the 

### c nn fl guration o f the 

### compoJlCnts l i s ted in 

### Paragmph 3

1 of)

### APPt :N IJIX 

### 1.8 S, Exi st ing F lare Gas Rec overy Sy st em { " FG RS ') 

### 5. 1 Co mple te desc riptio n of e ach major co mptmcnt. i n c lud in g b ut 

### 110 1 

### limited 1 0 : 5, 1. 1 C ompr es so rts). i ncl uding d esig n c apacit ies 

### 5. 1 .2**.,** :<cal(s ), rupt ure**~k** o r s imilar 

### d evice to 

### div ertth e fl o w 5.2 M axim um act ual past 

### 1 10
..... on an scfm ba sis and 

### the annua l 

### a v erage tl o \\ i n ",f m f or th e li ve years preced ing D ate o f Lod ging 5.3 Sim p lific d sc h e m a tic slt Ul" l ng 

### the F G R S 5 .4**cc** F low D iagra m t ha t ad ds the FG RS 1 0 l he P D F ( s) i n P IIf1" 

### 6
. Ha re D e sign 

### P arameters 

### 6
. 1 M a x imum V ent G as F l ow Rate and /or M a ss R at e 6.2 Maximu m**'C** G as FI Il w R a te and i or M a ss Ra t C' 6
. 3 Maxim um P urg e G as 1"1 0\\ and/ or M ass Rate , if appl ica blc 

### 6 .4 Mall. imum P i l o t G as F l o '" an d / or M a 'S Rate: 

### 6.5 M a xim um Sup pleme nta l Gas Fl ow Rat t' and ' or Mass R a te 

### 6. 6 I f**1ca m-il-'s** **is ed.**  M in imu m T o tal 

### S team Ra t e , includ ing 

### all a vailab le i nform ation on h o w thaI Rat e "' l1lI deri v ed 

### 7. Ga ses V e nti ng t o 

### n arc 7 ,]. S",1;'CJl O le; 

### 7
. 1
. 1 l'y pe o f gas 

### u.'IC.'d 7
. 1 .2 A dual 

### sc i ope rat ing flow rat e ( i n 

### sc fm j 7. 1 .3 , \\' e rng l: lower kali ng value e xpec ted f o r eac h t ype o f g a s used 7 .2 P ur g e G as. i f a pphca bll: 7.2 , I 

### Ty pe o f !)tilS 

### used 7
. 2 ,2 A e tual 

### K1 o perating 

### Il c w rate 

### (i n se f m ) 7.2 .3 Al crlI !)t c l ow er h enting value e xpected f or eec h 1 } l'C of g a s used 7 .3 Pi lo l Gall 7 .3. 1 T }pc of pu 'loCd 

### 1 .3.1 A cl ual !lot'! operaun g fl o w rate (i n se fm) 

### 7 J J A\'t: mge l o\\ er It< ati n g 

### v alue expt:Ctc d fo r e ac h 

### I y pe o f 

### gas used 1.4 S up ple men ta l G a s 1 .4. 

### t l y pe o f g lls 

### u sed**1.** A ,cr a ge lo"'er he ating v alue ex pec ted f or e a<.: h t ype (If Ilil. ' used 

### 7 5 S te am ( if o pplicab le) 

### 7.5
. 1 Dr aw i n g s bo wtn g poin t s o fintrod uctio n o f 

### l.ow er, C emer . U p pe r, and a ny othe r s t eam 7. 6 S im p lified fl ow d i a gra m t haI d e picts 

### the po i n t s o f i mro d uc thm of a ll g esesi llC lud ing W le; t e G a se s, atth e Fla re (i n di ugnu n, the de taijed d l1l w in ll s o f 7 .5
. 1 rna ) ' 

### be s implifie d; in addi tion
. d e tailed W8. t e G as m app ing is 1"10 1 

### requited ; a 

### s h n plc i den ti fi catio n of the h <.: adc li s) l h a t c ame S\y) tm: W aste Gas to the H lll'C



### 2 o f)

### API' ENUIX 1
. 8 and show (s ) i ts( th ei r ) 

### location in relati o n to t he location o f the 

### I ntro d u c tion o f t he caber g ases i s a ll that i s n:=qu ired ) 

### 8
. E:\i sti n l:! Mon it orinl:! Sy stem s 

### 8 , I A brie f narra ti ve de s cription
. 

### i n c!u ding m anu f a ct u rer and da t e o f in stallation. u f a ll 

### existing mon ito rin g syst ems , i nclu ding but not 

### hmitcdto : 

### 8
. 1 .1 W aste GIIS a n d/or V en t Gas 

### flow m o nito ring 

### 8 , 1.2 WIlSI e Ga.s and/or Ven t G as hea t c or ncm analyze r 81.3 Sweep Gas flow m onitorin g 

### 8 .1,4 

### P urg e G .u I1 vw monitori ng 8 .1.5 S upplem enta l Gas 11 0w mo nitorin g 

### 11.1. 6 Steam 

### Ilow m o nit vrin l:! 

### 8 .1.7 WIlSi e 

### G IL S or V en t 

### Gas mo l ec ul ar weigh t ana lY' .cr 8 .1.8 G all Chromato graph 8 .I. Q Sulfur ana lyzcr{s) 

### 8, 1.10 V id eo cam era 

### 1 1.1 .11 T h e rmocouple 11 ,2 D ra w in l:(s ) s how i ll l/ loca t i on s o f a ll e :\istinll lTlOl1 it orin g sy st.mlS 9
. M on ih >ri n g Eq u ipm ent 10 

### be I ns talled 1 0 Compl y ' 

### wi th C on !iCn l Decree 

### 10, Narra lh ' e D c -scrip uo n o f 

### tbe M on i t orin g M e thods and Calcul a nons t hat \Ooill be used t o co mpl y wi th th e N II V 

### o . S IV G
. 

### and M FR R eq u i reme n t s i n t he-**on~'IIt** Decre e 

### 1 1

.**ik ll** **li** .. m o f Calibrat ion 

### G ase s 1 0 

### be used t o eu mpl) ' w i lh Appendix 1 .1 0



### 3 

# o n

# •• (l

,'ITt:D SJ:.l 

### TES

. U
. 4R.-t 

### THO ,'

- / ' t: : TH()J,E CU CO HPd ,'l



## A r l 'EN ll lCES T O CONSENT ll ECI{EE



# APPENDIX 1.9

LI ST O F C O MPOUN DS A GAS C HR OMATO GRAPH MUS T B E CA PABLE OF S PEC IATING

### A PPE NDIX 1.9

LI S T (If 

### CO:\ lI' O t !N OS A GA S**Ii AT** **:\ 1l**  

### 'ICS T lit : 

### C APAH U : 

### O f S PfCl AT I :"'i(;



### I
.**Il ~<l** **ro g"n**  2. O:c. Ylwn 3
. Ni uo Ge n 4 , C a r bon 

### Dioxide 5 , Car bon M un u:c. idc 

### 6
. M ethane 7. Ejhane 

### 8
. Eih enc [ aka: 

### E th yl C'fl e ) 9

.**cc:t 'k~**  

### 10
. Propane I I
. Prope ne: ( aka : I' rup)'l mc ) 

### 12
. 

### 2· M l.' thylpr"p;lllc (a h: lso- Bu tane} 13
. B utane t aka : n -Bu t anej 1 4 , B ut-L e ne (aka :**t~ -nc:.**  

### a lpha-hul)' kn l.' ) 

### and**::.mc: th)** **'l pro** **pe** ( aka ; lso

- butylcne
. lso-bu ren c j 

### t the ", t ", o c onstu ..... 

# · t1l. , will be**a.~ur,,<l** un t he 

### sarn c c olumn an<llhe r e p o rt e d 

### re sult ",ill hi: 

### onc: \ 'l1l l1C : lhe:**~UJTl** 

### o f 

### the I Wo c onstituems] 1 5. E-bul-2-<.'11e 

### ( a k a: bct a-bery jene
. lra ns-butme ) 1 6
. Z-but

- 2-cne ( a ka: beta- butyk ne, cis- butene} 

### 17
. 1 ,3 butedicue 1 8 P e ntane 

### plus ( aka: C l plu s) [i"

..**Il Il** **Il C~**  

### with hvc Cs cr mo I'C) 1 9
. Hydrogen Sulfi de 

### O ulputs f ro m th e G lIS Ch romato grap h s hall be on 11 m ole percent basis ex cept 

### fu r 1l )' <l n ' Il < 'n SulI1Jl.' which wi ll be lin 

### a pan s 

### per million h asi s,**11'** ma y su bmit a re quest r u " PA fo r <I l' pru
.... 

### al o f changes 1 0 th e l i, ( 0 1' co mpounds '" GC 

### a l II parlil:u l ar Covered Rl.' fin l.' T} · mus t measure . I k nLe "" i s n ot required t <l 

### be s pecia ted b y 

### t he: Ga. , C h r onmtog r eph for thi s re finery se ttlement**~a use**  benze ne I S present i n 

### t he V c: nl Ga. s <l illy '7lilt imil**qua n'i** **li** Th e ve r n Ga. co rn fJ'OSit ion 

### i n", l\ cd in o ther f Ulurt' se ute mcms shoul d 

### be C\ alua ted on a 

### ca sc-hy ., ll.<;C ba s is t o de lenn iIIC 

### if bet lle ne specia no n s h uu ld he re qui red ,

I I>f I

# • • [ ' ",nED 5TA1I: : S

. U-IK1TIIO.\' rETROLf.'l'.\I CO.HPA :\T



## A I'I)EN DICES TO CONSEN T D E CIU : r.



# APPENDIX 1.10

E QU I PMENT AN D I NS TR UMENTATI ON TEC IIN ICAL S PEC IF ICAT IONS AN D QUA LIT Y ASSU RANCE /QUA LITY C ONT RO L R EQ UIR EM ENTS

### AP PENIJIX 1.10

E Ql ' IPMENT , \ N U**t'STR U~I** **r. NT** **ATIO '"**  

### n: CIII C Al SP f .C1F K ATIOS S ANO Ql l AUT\ ' 

### A SS L:RA ,,\n IO L:AI.JTY C : O:'llIRO l
. Rf Ol ' IRD It:N TS


### J.**\' E~ T**  

### G AS fLOW 

### M ETER

a . Ve loci ty R ange : O,I-250fVsec 

### b

. R e pt'a lab ility : ± 

### I % o f reading ( 'V Cf t he \e1oc itl' r ange
c . D C5ig n Acc untcy: ± 50/
. i nitial ly 1 0 -1 0' %
. 60%
. and 

### 90" /. of monitor f u ll llC<lle Il1I certified**b~** the man uf acture r d

. O peratio n al Acc uracy : ± 20"

... of reaJing O \CT!he v elocit y range of 0 

### I

- I I V s ll n d 

# * 5% of re adi ng e ver the \ d oc:i ly range of 1 -2 50 ft · s


### c . I nst.!lJllltjlln : 

### Al' l' liublc ACiA, 

### ANS I
. AP L or equivalent 

### standard 

### f

. Fl o" R ate Deiermmauon : Must 

### be**(: .,.f**  10 one a msosphcre pressure a nd 

### 6 8 

### g . QA ' QC : Annual cal ibr,IIioo 5hall be eondoc lcd
. 

### h
. Pre ssure 

### and T emperature 

### Se nsors : P art I \' 

### below
. II

. n : !\iT 

### ( ; AS .- \\ T R. -\C ;t: 

### :" IO lHTL \R 

### "t:l GIIT
. \'\. \ 1.**\'** 1 m.) h e .. 

### ",,1 ur l b
.. \,
.. 111 (;.s 

## n il"

. \ I e l e r '
II

. M olecular Wdl;hl R an ge and Accurac y : 2 1 0 1 20 gr /grmo l , ± 2 %



### a.- k epeatah i l i t y : ± 1 % of**re aJin**  over 11M: nt nge of t he instru ment b Ae eurac y; . 1- 1 + . fro m 100' % 1 0 of 'pan + /
- 2 % from 1 50/
. 106 % o f s pan 

### + 1- 3 '. from 

### 6% t o**,.** of Npan

e . l nst altetio e : Apphcable A G A , A .'\JSJ, A PI. o r equivalent s t an dar d d
. Fl ow Rate Determinati on : 

### Must t>I: correc ted 10 un e atmos phe re pre,surr 

### and 

### 68 O F

101' 5

### APPENDIX 1. 10

e . QAiQC' : An nual c alib ration shall be con du cted
. f
. P re s , ure and Tcmp¢mIUtc Se nsors : M f' Part IV below. 

### I V
. VE NT GAS A ND S T E A '\1 U .n\\' :\IETEI{ S : PR E SSl IR f : 

### , V W T D ,l Pf :R. · \T l R E S EN SOR S

a . T c mpcraur rc monitor mUSI 

### be calib rated an nually 10 '" 5 % , b
. Pressure monito r m ust 

### be calibrated annuall y 1 0 withi n ± 5 % , 

### V
. G AS C HRU'\ lAl OC R Al' l1 ( " ( ; ( ' '' ) A
. ( ;u c ral
a**A"Uta~** The gas c hro malogmphy s y stem s hall be 

### maintaine d IU 

### be ac curale within 5% 

### of f u JI scale
. b
. Repealahilily : :l: 

### 0.5% 

### of full 

### scale f ur 

### nil I 

### sc ale r:m ges from 

### 2 -100 0 

### '0 : :l: 

### 1 % o f f ull scale f ur f u JI Sl; ak tunlte s t"fOm 

### 0, 05_ 2 0/ 0

; i 2% o f fu ll sc ale f or f ull s cale r ange s f rom 5 0-500 ppm ; i 3% of f ull sc ale for full sc a le r ange s 

### f rom 5 -50 p pm: ± 

### 5% o f full sc ale for full scale range s from 

### 0 .5

- 5 ppm ;
c . The minimum samplin g f req uency shall be one sample c vc lj ' 15 minute s . d
. The G C s hall 

### be c apable of speciating all g as con slituent s li s ted in A p pen dix 1. 9,

e . T h e sam pling: s ystem s hall 

### be heattraced and mainta ined a l 5 7"C 

### with no c old spots . All s ystem c cm ponems shall be hea ted , including the probe e xternal t o th e tl an: p ipin g, c alibration v alv e , s ample line s. sa m pling I Of'p l or sam pl e introduction s y stem I
. and GC o ven . 

### I: \l.ben: t«hnicall} ' fcas ibh:
. the samplio g lo c ation s hould 

### hi: allea,t two e q uiva len t d uct d i amete r s d O
.... nstream fro m the**n~an;,t** c ontrol
.. k\'lc e . po int o f pollutalll gen eratlno
. or o ther point at ..... hi ch a c haoge in t he pulll,lI""1 concentration o r emissio n rate O CCl1T'l
. The [ocati,m 'houl d not 

### be c lose to a ir in

- f eakages
. W h e re tec hnically l i:asl hle , th e lo cation s h ould a lso be a l le ast 

### 0.5 diameters upst ream f rom t he**){ ha** **lL~1** o r c ontro l dev ice
.

2 u f 5

### A I' I'E NOIX 1,)0
B
. Gu C hr u millugnflh C aUhntiun Sia ndanh 1.**:'Ii~ ll~** **ting .l**  n il**Anahl~ lrII.** **un:m~nh** F or 

### tho: I'\tt**H~at ing**  

### Valu e and**Afla l}t~**  mcu-'1 urem"n
..... . th " 

### tiC IlhD JI be**op.:ml~-d** and main tained i n acco rdance Yo it h P e rf o rmance**Spec;ili ~ali** **on** 9 (

- PS9 , o f A I' ]X'ndix B 

### of 40 C F 

### R- P an 60 exce pt :
It

. 

### The dai ly mid ·lew l \ol id : lli on 

### procedure in Sc ,,: ti.. , n 

### 10 ,2 o rJ 'S 9**~hall** be**"OndUt;teJ** o n 

### the Net I leatinll 

### Valee in o;t "aJ o f 

### OIl ClKh anal }te
. 

### ' The 11 \ e rage in strument response sh4IIlnot \ lll) ' 

### b y more 

### [han 1 0 per-c<m t fro m th e 

### N e t !leatin g 

### ValUl: u f the**'fI ti** **."I** c al ibration 

### gas , 

### b
. The m ulti- po int 

### calibration erro r e hl. "l: k prcccfare in Se.; liun 

### 1 0 1 of PS9 

### sha ll be conducted 

### quanerl> ' fur 

### the limited SC i of 

### anaI )te s list ed i n 

### S ubpa ragraph V
. B , 1 .1: bel ow . The 

### GC mus l 

### m«t 

### tho: eali bra1 ion performance criteria i n Sections I I I 

### and 13.2 off'S9 

### for th e listed anaI) l': S only
. such that: (i ) 

### the averaile instnun<ml 

### response must 00{ differ 

### by ' moee 

### than 1 0 pl.'fI. -ent o f 

### the cali brati\m gas \ alu.: : and (i j) the precisi on anJ lincant) · check o f eac h a nalyt c 

### li sted be low s hall nol de\- iale than 5 percen t from 

### lIN: ave rage coocenlraiion measured
. 

### c . The 

### anaI )1C S t o be used are :
1. Hydro gen II

. N itrogen 111**lelhanc** 1\

'

. 

### E thane v . Propane vi. 

### P lO P ) ICll e d
. 

### Thc calibml i on gas m i xture s rna> 

### be :O<:1 b y 

### the prtlcedures i de ntified in Sect ion 7
. 

### t o f P S9 o r 

### ma y 

### be within 10 percent ofthe c oncenlnllio n 

### v aJ UI.'S li s ted 

### i n T able I
. T he ges es must be certified til t 

### 2 !X"r-cenl.



### 3 0f S

### AP P[)'l; I)JX 1.111

[ . " 1I"I).f!l II


### lh dl l/2tll )'I;itru I: D 

### I ,h, ll 

### r:'j 11 11 :1 1
.... ·I'll 

# "'. -' ,



# , " $;, 01' ,**[~ 'l~** **1Oi ~"t,"**  

# , 65**~b** 

### ],[11..11 ,J,il,l ._ <0 

# " 

# , "J" 1 ;\ 

### n,**n,~" ,,,**  , H ' . 

### 12 

# s 1



### M l: lh anl: 

# " 22 

# " " [ t hll DI: 

### 3 2 

### 3 

# " Pr o p an l: 

### +':.;(J {l): ! l: nt**~l lcn**  

### l 

# , 

# , I I I 

### l 

# , 1 

# " s 3 N II V ( B lu /. cO 310 

# '" 12 73 l lnll dju' lcd f <o r I he individua l unaly t es are tn**vo um~**  perc en t. 

## ' 12



# . . . 2
. Il l S
. \ I n . uR m.. n t F ur tnc H : S me asuremen t, the 

### GC '!Iudl be o po: ra ted and ma in tained i n accord ance wi th Pertormance Sp.:<;ilil:at ion 7 o f 

### Appendi
.. B o f 4 0 C

. F .R , Pan 60
. ljua ht) , as surance pnxooure s Sl.1 f o rt h 

### i n Appcndil( F of "O C .F .R. P an 60 s hall 

### be foll owed 

### Tho: span s hall 

### be al )20 ppnn- H : S
. 

### \
. J. C alru ' "l i n D o r 

### In ' lru m fR I 

### U n" nl iml: I
. F o r pUTJIOS" o f ca kul atin¥ the 

### 1 10 mH1 B p<.'T c ale n dar q uart er o f in.trument downtime: 

### allowed puBlUUll to**Pil1a~raphs** 28 and "R
. the time lL,ed for (Ie ea li l>ru tio n and ' alidalilHl llCth it ;..·. req uired tl ) Sutl p;lnl graph V .H.I o f this Appo:nd ill 

### m a)

- be exd udoo
. 2 , An y bcur 

### thet meets t he fC qu in:m enl s o f " O 

### C F

. R. 

### § (, 0 D( h )(2) s hull n or be co unted to w -anJ in strum en t d c w mimc
. Spcci lkall )': ( i) Fo r a f ull 0 pc l'llt i n g ho ur (an y 

### dock hour "here: t he tl are i s available fo r u pcra tiun for 60 minute s ). if**rc** o r e a t leaSI f our valid d ala points III ell ll:utate t he h ouri > a ,c ra l./e (th ut i s. one d ,n a point in each 

### oftbc I S

- m i n u te q uadrant s or t he h our)
. rh en lhere**i~** no perillo.! o fins tru me n t d uw n t im e: (i iI F or 11 pan iaJ**~n ll**  hour (an y 

### cloc k hou r 

### with than (>( ) millul CS o r uni t up. :ratiun ). if t here i s at 1
... e st o ne 

### valid d Uln pI. ' inl 

### in e ach I S-m inulc qual1ran l o f tllc hou r in "hich th e unit o pt. 'T3. tes t o ca lcula h: l he h ourl y ave rage , then th ere i s no period o f i n.,t nun ent downtim e ; and

4 00

### APPF.)'IlDiX 1.10
( iii ) For any o peratin!:: h our in w hich 

### req uired m ainten ance or**qual i(** **ur an**  activit ie s on the instrum ent s or m onito rin g**)-ste ms**  associated w ith the fl are 

### an: [ )\

.. rfbrrned : ( Al lft lte flare i s available f or o penu io n in t wo o r mOT!: quadran ts 

# or the hour and if the n: 

### an: 

### atleas t two 

### \ ·a1id dala p,-, inb**~ted** b ) 

### atleast 1 5 

### minut es 10 

### calcula te the h our i} ' 

### a \ cragc, lh.c: n th ere 

### i

. 00 

### [lC riod of in,ltUm"n t d " wntimc ; O r ( 8) I f the 

### fl an: is avail able f or opera tion in onl y o ne quadrant of 

### the hour and lf therc IS at le as t one valid data po in r m c alc uL:a te 

### the huur l) ' 

### averag e , t hen then: 

### i. 00 period of inmument do wntime
. VII
. I\I F, T f.OROI, ()( 'I( '**T'\ IO**  

### a, W ind**.~ pecd**  sen. "Of'l m u st 

### be calibrated annually t o + 1
_ 1 0" /•.

50 f 5

### UN I TE/) ST. · I 7'f ;S 

# '

. MARAT 110 , .... 

### P t'TROLE VM C OM PiNt'



## A PPEN DI CES TO CONS E NT D E CR EE



# APPENDIX 1.11

W AST E G AS M APPI NG: L EVEL OF D E TAIL NE EDED TO SHOW MAI N HEADERS AND PRO CES S UN IT H EADER S

### A PI'E NDIX 1 .11
WASTE G AS MAPPIN G : LE VEL O F DETAIL N EEDED T O SHOW MAIN HEADERS AND PR OCESS UN IT H EADERS 

### Purp os e : W aste Gas M apping i s r equi r ed in orde r to id entify t he 

### sourcets) o f w aste ga s entering each Cov ered F lare

. Waste Gas M apping ca n be 

### don e using instrumen tation , iso topic tr acing, a coustic monitorin g. a nd/or e ngineering estimates for all sources en tering a fl are header (e ,g p ump se al p urges. sampl e station p urges , co mpressor se al nitrogen pu rges, rel ief valve lea kage , and o ther sources under n ormal oper ations). Th is Ap pendi lC o ullines wha t n eeds to be included as the W aste Gas M apping section wi thin the I nitial W aste G as M inimization Plan ("In itial WG MP ")


## W a st e G as M apping Cr iter ia : F or p urposes o f wa ste g as m apping, a m ain h eader is de fined as t he l ast p ipe segment p rior to the fla re k nock out dru m . P rocess unit he aders are de fined as pipes from i ns i de the battery li mits of ea ch process unit t hat connect to t he mai n he ader

. For process u nit h eaders that are gre ater t han or equal to 

### six (6) 

### i nches i n di ameter , fl ow (" OJ 

### mus l be 

### i dentified an d qu an tifi ed if it is technically r easible 1 0 

### d o so . In addition , al l sources f eeding e ach process unit he ader m ust b e ident ified and li sted in a ta ble

. but not n ecessarily in dividually qu antified

. For proce ss u nit he aders t hat ar e l ess than S ; lC (6) 

### inches in diam eter , sour ces mus t 

### be id entified

. bu t they do not need 1 0 be 

### quantifi ed

W ast e G as M appin g Subm iss i on Requi r em ents : F or each Covered Flare , the following sh all be i nclude d Within the Waste G as Ma pping sectio n of the Initi al WG MP : 

### 1
. Simp lified Schem atic consis tent wi th the e xample sch ematic in cluded on the second page of this Ap pendix. 

### 2. T a ble of all sources conn ected to each fl are ma in h eader and p rocess unit h eader consis tent with the T able i ncluded on the t hird p age o f this Appendix

.

lof 3

# • • 

# I I 

# i


# I I 

# I i 

# • 

# I i
, 

# ( 

# • 

# . • 

## I 

# · i I • 

# • J 

# f if I ' I J 

# I k 

# i • 

# • 

# (I

i a 

# d 

# I J I. • 'i I 

# J 

# ii' 

# r I • IeJ· 

# I • 'I


# - : 

# I 1 

# J I,

.

- I j 

# JJ 

# J 

# I r a 

# I

, 

# - 

# L f tI 

# - , 

# -I , >j I 

# • I 

# l 

# h I 

# -r ! 

# I a
•



# - i 

# a 

# - 1 a

### Table 1 : Ex ample 

### of Flare Sou rce De s cripti on Tab le 

### Process Unit 

# I Sources 

# I De taIled Source Oescnp tion Header ( Ex : 

### F CCU G as Con 

### Unit ) 3 PSVs
2 P ump Se l l P urg es I S a m S tation P SV·14 on 11 0-0- 5 Gil COIl Absorber 

### P SV ·1 2 on 1 10-0-1 Armne Scrubber P SV

- 7 on ll G-F · l Bat ch CIl4I1 C 

### V eue l 11 0-0-1 L PG Pump 11 o-G-2 

### RiCh Am
.... 110- &-1 L PG 1 P SV 1 Pre S IUl1l Cont rol V

alve 1 PS V 1 P um S e a l Pu e Con tInue
.. me . s P H1 C On\lnU" lllI m" II P HI P SV 1 7 on 11 2 -0 -1 MaI n Col umn PC V 21

- Eme roency We i Gil CompresSO f PSV -21 on Fl ush Oi l Drum 

### 11 0- 0. 23 S tu 01 1 P um C onllnue •• m e • • 

### P Hl Connnu e sam e II P H1 

# a _

Ex 

### Gas a,l T re atef \ 

# a• • A- H B- H 

# a• • ContI nu e . ame a. P HI 1 P SVs 2 Pump Se a l P ur ges C onllnUI s a rna a. P Hl P SV -17 o n 1 09-E-42 S I I,l H a at Ex cha n a f 11 G-o. 3 G as all Fe ed 

### 11 o-G-4 Ma," Col umn Renux



### l oOL".' "' ITED S1

... 

# res 

# , . 

# "HR." T IfOS PE TRO LEUM CQ

. IfP .H'J'


## AI)I' ENI>ICES TO C O;\iSENT n E CRE E



# APPENDIX 1.12

R EPRESENTAT IONS OF DI S CO NTI NUOUS W AK E DOMIN AT ED FLOW

### APPEi"'iOlX 1. 12
RF:PRF:SPITATIO:,,/ S OF mSCO:'liT I :'Ii\ IOl IS WAKF.**V()'II~"n :J)**  

### FLOW

Ddin ilion "Discontinuou s Wake Do minated F low " shall rncen ga s fl ow 

### e x il ing a Flare li p thaI 

### is il kn l ilicd



### , 'i

.

• ually b y : 

### I
. The p resen ce o f a flame thitt i s : (I) immediate ly**ad j~l**  the e xteri or o f the 

### Flare tip body: and ( 2) below the e x it plan e (l ( the FlllJ1: li p ; nnd it 

### A 

### discontinuous flame
. such 

### that poc kets 

### of flameare d etached 

### from the portion of the fl ame that i s i mmediately adjacen llo the e xt erio r of the Flare tip bod y .**Ja kg** **(l** IllJ Th e gases present 

### ju s l o utside o f thc fl are li p are i nf luenced b) ' se vera l factors
. All ofthese 

### factors ar e present all o f the t ime
. bu tll5 

### proces. ' and en vi ronme ntal conditions chang e, 

### !ht relative "s tre ngth' of e ach f acto r 

### will chang e . 

### "The most 

### dom inant factors will dictate the fl ow o f th e V ent Oa"O ./ .I' , w il l determ ine: th e si zc.lIhape
. and din:o;tion of the flame
. Some of 

### the in fluences o n the Ven t Ga. '<C!I are :
o Th e l o w pre ssure region , or wake
. that i s dow Tlwind and next 

### t o the fl are.
o Th e temperature grad i ent that ca u. ws the
.. arm co m bustion ga.ses t o be buoyan t. 

### o r rise.

o Th e i nert ia. or resi stance 10 c han l!CS i n speed and directio n . o f the Vent Oa.'lCS lIS 

### they e,it the t ip
. The regime s be l ow 

### shew 00'" a name .. 

### ill appear when the mos t do m ina n t i nflue nc es arc , respect ively
. thc w ake
. the b uoyanc y due 10 temperature , and the inertia d ue 10 th e 

### g as's 

### momentum .

## A P PEN DIX 1.11: 

## Elevated Flare Reactinq Flow M ix ing.!!Slmes

II , ,. j l't mOlMntum 

# fl LIJ./ trot. 

## ln cr eas in

lm .g""**."~** ('"m; 1'n>c li<al I mpli<ation. o r m o,**R~oaroh** "" 1 <>day " OU I'lunding fl

..... Emi" i" ", Qu
.. li""
. &l,d. Rncarth Prugrom 10 Ano
.. er Thom J .'nn Seebold, C h
.... '<n1Tutou**R<1,,~dl** l'e1 er**''' ll**  Nat .nll R
..**""r<~.** Caoad. Jufln**I'nh~** Vj'll ;nia**PuI~lc<hn;<** I
.... (i' ul •• n d Siale Un;',,";ly R obm s< h"oru, j ohn /.i ,>I:, Co,upany I. LC 

### As a w ake d ominated l1am e be!:ttmL'S l ess s table. it b<."(:uml;:s M':gm e nled, o r discontinuoU1l , The f ollowing 

### is a represc n till i"n of " D iscuntinu"us Wal e 

### Dominated Flow." Th e re d a rea is an artist's**nd** 

### o f a flam e .

20 f4

### APP[!'Ii'DiX 1.12


# n.... toll"
..... inil image rep resents a flame 

### below the 

### plane**rt~** t:oo:it 

### ofthe 

### narc li p . Ho wever , since the tl ame is nu l di scont inUOl1. ' 

### and IlO1 immediately adjacent to the l i p . this image 

### w ould nOI represe nt Dlscontinueus 

### Wue Dom inal OO Flow
.



### The 

### follo... inll**ima~e** n:PmlC11tS D f lam e below the 

### plane o f the nit oflhe**n~** 

### tip and Dttacht:d to th e tip
. H owev er , s ince the 

### n ame is not d isconti n uous, thi s im age would nu l represe nt Oi'OCOTll inuoWl Wake Do minate d Flow
.

3 

### o f"

## A P PEN IH X 1.12
I n order for 1M flame 10 be deemed discontin uous , i t shoul d he segme nt ed. an d not m erel y**~s** 

### sma ll pockets o f flam e: at 

### the: o uter boun dary or a s i n g le l arge cohesiv e f1 aml:
. F urtbermore
. a discontinu ous l1 ame .... ill n ormally ap pear thin 

### r e la ti v e: 10 i ts le ngth. llIId lad B s inil lc: bulbou s core . . Iltc: 

### foll o ..... ing image: re p r esents a flame 

### w ith 1I s mall 

### poc h1 o f flame on ly a t lhe o u ter edge s o f the broad m ain fl ame, Th i s would nut re present a di!ll;Of\ti nuu \lS flame
. and therefon: would no l 

## t>e Dis continu ous Wa ke Do minated F low
.

4 of 4UNITED STA TES 

# '. Jf

. ·tR.1 THO , ... • PETRQLEl1M CO .HP

. ... ..... 

### y


## AI)I·ENI>ICES TO CONSENT DECREE



# APPENDIX 1.13

CALCULATING TilE AMOUNT OF STIPULATED PENALTIES DUE FOR VIOLATING LIMITATIONS OF FLARING WHEN TilE STIPULATED PENALTIES ARE BASED ON EXCESS VOCS AND SO, EMITTED

### A PPEN IlI X 1. 13
C A LC \ ' 1 ,, \T I" W 

### 'ru t**"\ Ol** **~\oT** 

# or sm- rr.v rtu P !':S A LT IF:S 

# on : H JB \ ' I O L " T I :-O; (; L1\I1 T 

## .c no vs**() "L** **ARI~** 

### Wilt : !" Tilt : H lrt 'LA r m rJ:!' li .u : m :s A R} ; 

### B .-\ Sf:D 0:\ 

# rxn :ss ve e, A !'\O U '1 0 1 

# n Un } :D I
. 

### S t i ll u l " l c d P tO " IfiM 

### f o r \'i o l "t l og t he 3 0

- 0 11\ ' 

### Roll io g Ao e ra u Limi 1 The 

### fo llo wing equat ion s hall hi: 

### used 10 

### calc ula te t he amount o f s ti pul ated penalti es d ue f o r 

### violating the J o-day rollin g e vereg elimit o n flaring :
n 

### P

enall y d ue 

# - r I SS _ ..... · EE )OoLv oc !-+- ISS JOd , ' IOl 

### x E E lM sw l ( f:q
. 1) 

### W1I<: re :
n 

# - Ea.;h da y th e 30 -<.lay ro llin g av era gelimn is e x ceeded 

### SS J<I<I V\)( ' 

## • Do ll an pe r t o n of V O(' 

### fo r v iol ating t he**0-da mi**  

### ( S200l lO n i n an 

### ozone attai nment area; 

### S3001 to n i n a n 

### ozo n e n

U

Ba llllin m l:nt are a) 

### f 

### F. 301. \'0(" 

# - J O-duy ave r age V OC 

### em issions ebov e 

### th e fl o .... l imit o n da )' l i mi l 

### is v iolated ; 

### ur E q uation 3, a 

### S

S

)I>l >01 

# - 001l 1ll'S pc:1" 1 0 0 

### o f 50 1 

### f o r violaring 

### Ju- day l imit ( S I OOlt on) ( ': E >od.. 'IOl 0 

### 3 0-day av erage S O l e m i ssions abo ve t he 

### fl uw Ii m i, o n da y l imit is 

### violated ; , <U 

### E q Ull l ion 

### -t.e II
.**ti p u** **lmt ~d**  

### P
.. n a l ti..., f o r 

### \' lo l , .. in &t h
.. 

### J6!1i -d lllY R olling A v ..r llg
.. li mil 

### The f oll owing equation sha ll 

### be: used 10 

### cal culate the amoun t o f s tlpulured penaltie s 

### d ue f o r v iolat ing the 36S-day ro llin g a ve r age li mit o n fl aring :
n 

### P

enal t ) 

### Jut 

## • I SS lIi!4 VlX 

### EE J(l !4 VOl. 

## I

... IS S )/>!4 .V\l 

### x E F. )/> S4, sml ( F: q . 2) 

### i '" I W

here :
n 

### Eec h**a~** 

### lhe 

### J 65 -<.1ay ro llin g 

### a verage li mi t 

### i s e xceeded 

# - S S "' !4, VOl' 

# - Doll an per to n o f v O e tor 

### violating 365-day li mit (S2 0!t.m i n an o z one attain m en t area ; 1 30 /100 

### in an o zo ne nonattainmcn t a re a 

### l 

### E

E )O u- v n c 

# - 365-d ay a vera ge 

### V (X

- emi ssions abc
... e 

### the 

### 11 0
.... limit o n da y 

### li mi, 

### h

. ·jo lated: 

### s ee E q ua', o n 3 , b**J6 U-**  

# - Doll<lr.'l per ton o f 

### SO;r; fo r .iola l ing 3 0 

### day c all 

### (S10 /\1>0)**EEJ4,u-~** 

### 365- d ay a v e ra ge 

### S Ol emi ssions abo ve t he flow l imit o n da y l im i t 

# - violated ; 

### Equation 4
. b



### I o f 4

### A PPF:S IlI X 1.1 3

II I. Cliku l llli nil AHrag f' F. ", i
.. i un, u r 

# vu e.**hu~** lh , n u .. , Limil ",h e' n Vi ol ati ng I h,

_ \0

- 0. , li nd .l 65- U1l 1 R ulli ng Anrag, Li mil A
. Vi bbting I h , JO

- dn ro lling 

### anng' limit
. The f oUo
.. in@ f'qulIlion 

### shal l be usa! 10**lilalc** 

### th e 3 Q.day 

### a verage V OC 

### e missions abo ve 

### the Il cw lim it fo r the**dll ~'**  t hat t he J D-day ro ll i ng 

### average limit 

### is " i\l l ul\ "\l : 

### EE )OoI. 

### voc • I Q ;ou"
..... - Q J ""

. 11
. .. _ HVDC Jool
. .. 

### hc\ "", 1 [ .00261 [ M W l fid 

### vo rl [
. 0005 JlI
.. C E-.



## .. _ J \ t : q. 3
. • 1 W h ere :
EE ll\I , \fOl ' • J O-day averag e V OC emissio ns above the fl ow lim it o n 1 1K: day thai the 30-d ay rolling avc raitc l im i t i s viola ted , in tons pe r da y**Ae llaI3O-d** **a~** 

### rolling a v era ge W."le GllIl Fl ow 

### Rare on the day 

### rh

et th.. J O -d a} rolling 

### a verage lim i t 

### is violated , in scf d Allowable J O-day rolling average 

### we sr e Ga s Flo w Ra te ta ken from t h e Consen t Decree
. in scf d 

### 3 lJ-d"y fl ow w eighl ed rollin g 

### a verage VDC v o lume frac li on i n 

### the W aslo: G IlS o n lile 

### dily thai 

### th e 3 0-da } ro llin t! a\ 'crage 

### limit i s 

### violated [NOT F. : Th is t he VOC f ra ctio n i n the**a.** G M. nOI 

### tbc V ent 

### G ul Th e .,I ,tily 110w we i @hlOOa \cra g eVOC vo lume fracli on s h U 

### be dctcrmi n\-..J f rom an 8\CTlI ge of I n.: h ou rl y ncr"!! e 

## \foe c oncentration w eighl (-..J 

### 11) ' 

### waste g as flow
. 

### The 3 0-day n ow 

### weighted rolling av erage 

# v ex: v olum e f ractio n shall 

### be determined f rom dai ly flow
.. eig h te..! CE and d ally ' fl ow of waste 

### g "- 5
.



### . 00 2 6 

## • I lb-molc V0CI 3H 5,5 sc f 

### MW )OoI. \IOC 

# - JO-da y fl o .. wei ghted roll ing a verage Molecular We ight o f V OCs o n the 

### da) ' IItai the 30-da } rol ling 

### average l imit 

### is violated , in 

### l b'lbm ole. 

### The dai ly flow
.. cighled avera!:e m olec ular
.. ei ghl 

### ( MW) s hall 

### be determined from an average o r lh.: h ourl y avera ge MW

.. eighted b ) '**a~ le**  gM 

### flow
. Th c**30-da~** flow w ei ghled ro lling a\ 'crage M W s hall 

### be determined f rom dail y fl ow W
.. 

### igh tcd M W li nd dai l y flo
.. l ,f
....**a.~le** g as.

, 000 5 

### I 1 0 n!2 000 Ih



### 2 of "

### A P Pt : N Dl X 

### 1.13

3 0-day ro lling a v er age C omb ust i n n E fficiency ( " C E " ) d etermined from t he KI IV « ofthe Comb ustion Zone Gas a s fo llows : 

### l\ H V " ( BTU /set) C E
.. 

### r... """ N HV ,, <Q6 

### 00



# - 96 <'" NH V u <3 00 300 = 

### Nl t V <I < 350 3 50 <=**NJ IY** **25 ~2** **<'-** 

### N1 IV
.. <500 

## - - 1 0
. 1 2 * {· lj 5+ NlfV
.. l] / [I +<l
. 1 2*( -95 + Kl IV u lJ 0.9 8 0 .985 0
. 9875 500 < -**IY ~.**  < 600 

### 60 0<- N IlV " 0.99 0.'195 Co m bus t i o n E fficiency s hall 

### be d ete rmin ed hour ly f ro m the hou rly a verag e NII \' " us i ng the table above , l 11c dai l) ' flow w eighle d 

### a vera g e CE s ha ll 

### be determin ed [ rem lUI average o ftbe hourly aver age CE values we ighte d by**a~ le**  ga s 110w
. Th e 3 0.tJay flow weighted rolli ng ave r a!!e CE s hall 

### be d etermin ed from daily 110,"" 

### weigh te

d C E and ,Ja i l) ' 

### Ilcw o f waste gas.



### IJ

. Vi ola tin lZ t h e 3 6S-da \ ro lli n lZ a H 'r a ee 

### limit. To calcu late the 365·day a " erage 

### V O C e missions 

### above t he 

### 11 01'.' li mit 

### for th e d a) ' that th e 365-day ro lli n g a verage l i m it i s

S ubstitut e "365 " e v erywher e " 3D" appears in Equation 

### La t Efl

. J .b)

[Appendix contin ue d on ne x t page l



### 3 0f 4

## A PPF.NDlX: 1.13

I"
. 

## e M leu 1M lin g**Ih** 

### A \ 'tt':ll gt**fm** o f 

### S O , th c 

### . · 10
... Li m it "h cn "loI M lin , lh r

, \ lJ- U a l' Mod 'b5- I) M' R ulli ng A Ht':llg C l
. im il A
. \' iolMli n g, t h e 3 0 , dn r olling**aH rM** **g~** Ilnlil . T h e 

### following eq llll tion shal l be

us ed 1 0 c.:I leul a l e!he 3o. day a v erag e**ll .'** **ssin** abo v e t he n ow l i mi t f or th e da y l halt l'M: 30 -d ay rolli n !! a\"e r:lge 

### Hm rt i s violated :**/h ~ rc**  JO-day 

### 8\'t l1l8 e S (h em issions 

### a bo ve I I'M: Iluw li mit on the da y I Mt t he JO -day ro lling 

### a verage l i mit i s vi ol ate d. in ton s 

### pe r d a y Q J IId.a<IuoI • A Cl uai JO-day ro llin g 

### a v era ge W aste (i u s 

### F l ow R ate o n !he da y tha lthc J O-day rolli n g overag e l imit i s viu l a tetl. i n scf d A llo wab le 3 O-duy r ollin g av cralle W aste tj es 

### F lo w K ale bl e n f ro m t ile C on sen t [)L "l: rCC, in scf d
C JOol.I Il'S • JO -day 

### r ollin g a verage co ncen t ratio n of 

### I hS 

### i n Wa s t e 

### G :l.!I o n t he da y that t h e t h at t he 30
.. .. 1a } ro lling avera ge l i mit i s violated. in ppm v 8
. J O 1 0
. 1 • [ I lb -mole I b S/38S
. S sell 1M I b S O z!1b- m o 1c IhS] [ Tu n!20 00 lb ]

B
. \"i u l Mtin g th r J 6 S=d 1l \ · rollin g a ' r l1lgr l i m it. T o c alcul a t e t h e 3 6S .J ay a verage emis sion s of S Ol a bo ve t n.: ll o w l imil f o r 1 11c d a } ' t he 3 6S-day ro lling av erag e 

### limit is v iola ted ; Substaut e**6S** e very .... ilcrc a ppears i n Equa ti o n 4
. .. 

### (£q
. -tb )

[E n d 

# o r A ppc ndix ]

.j o f 4

### t:.\" ITI:. " " ST A Tf :S 

# ' 

# .

. ' IAR A TII O.\' Pf.'TROLJ:: l l M CO -" P AN Y



## A I ' PENDICES TO C ONSENT Il E CR EE



# APPENDIX 2 .1

C OVERED FL ARE S AN D A PP LIC ABI LIT Y D ATES FOR CE RTA IN C ONSENT D E CR EE R EQ UIR EM ENTS**APf NDI~**  Z-l - COVJREO f !A B U A ND

.... P P UCABl lITJ DAns fOR a RJAIN CO NS N! pECRU II£Q UIIIEMENTS 

# .- W 

## ' 

# ...... .... . .... "" ". 

# ... 1"m'l

... .,."



# - = 

# . , """, 

# .. ..... 

# ".

'" "",n""
...

...... 'TOO"
..**~.**



# . ..... " 

# " 

# .-
. "

_ "" fill"**~.**



# . ..... ..



# .. ' 

# ........... " " w ......... 

# .... , 

# ............**~.** 

# -"



# '" .<:tl.AAI

....... 

## ' 

# . . 

# - ""

" 

# "'**-~** 

# .. ....,. 

# . ... .. 

# .. ...

'" 

# - -,

... 

# .............
,. , u .... . ""' , ,, 

# ""

........ ... ' 

# . _ 

# . "' ..... ...... A 

# " COIo' :....c. 

# .'- ••



# '" 0<

. ...-, lU '.lOl' 

### ......m '**,~ u"**  

# .. '.lIJoU 

## = 

# '" 'U "" ,. "" "' ,, ' >.1'
. 10" 

# , '--" .,,'

. <AfIfm"""G



### _



# .... 

# _'

... ..

' · ll

.... · ' 

# •• POI '
.. ..... 

# , .. ,. B 

# '. ". "" = POI ' ""
..... 0610 "'1< 

# .,. "1/ ",, 0610 ,." 

# ,=- ",**.~~** 

# .. ""**,,~** 

# .. , 

# .. .,. lO ",n 

# " "", ,, 1) ''''" = 07 ". ", 11 

# .,. 

# . .. "'"


# .. Ill."" "110 ."" •


# , =- ICC" 

# , ,, 

# "

. 

# • • POI '
.. "
... , "
. '''n '. 11" " 

## = 

# POI .""
.... 

# ... ". " "'
. 1010" .. ,., "'lO CO nI , ,,,,,,",, 

# , 

# ... ... 

# - 1·" -1'1-' 

# . ,. "", .",,,. ,. '.n >o u 11 ' 1'
.. 

## = 001
. ...... ... . 1Oll OO .IIl>O" 

# . " , >0 "



# .... \ ., 

# , . PO!. Ill

.... 1 11>011 

# "" ." = 001·
....... 

# . ,., >0 " OIi ,">O " .... . 10
.. P

H " M ""
... '



## 0

"' " 

# .. OPt _ Ill

. ... " '. >011 I .OlJll " 

## = 001 · ... ... 

# . " "'" 0Ii "
. ;/<11.1 06Jo...". 

# "" ""'"

.... " " 

# ... ""' ''' 

# . ,. "'"


# . "' 

# . ... , 1I1!1l.1 7JUOU 

## = "", 

# ... 

# - •. IIl ,. " 

# " "" .>0" "
. 1ll .1O'. 

# .-.

""

. , 

# . ,. "",

. 

# "' 

# .... In >o u ' " 10 11 

## = 

# ""' 

# . .. ;..,. • lillO' ' 

## "n, ,-,,, ,, 

# 00.10 "'''

" m

ce ,, ' "'
... 

# . 

# - ' H l"'ll 0 ""0 .1." " ' . '0" H 'IP" 

# ... .. "'" 0 '" '"' II 

# ..... "' 

# .. ..... '0" "" '" >0"

.......... 

# , "' - ""' ·10
...... 001
. !lI

.... , n ,101' '

. Il 

# >0
.. = 

# "",
. "" ,m '
. " lO ll 1.111 ""
. 

### " ..-»"**,.** 

# """"'",,-


# ..... ""' _1 00
... OPt·
.. .... ' ''. >Oll 

# '. lI. "' '' = llOf·

.. .... ' 

# , "''''n 1.1 " 

# >0 " 

# .. ,,"',.

""",,, 'll( 

### G

....: _ ......... 

## -', <0 , 00/
. ... ." 00<' ., . ... 

# " ".B 

# ' " 

# ,. 

# .. = 

# ""' 

# . .. 

# - , '" " "' " "-" '10 " 1' ,"10
0
...... ' ''-' 0
.......... 0_ 

# .. 

# - 001 • Ill
.... 001'
. Ill
.... 1
. ".101 ' ,. U 

## = 

# _. "" .- f "

. "" 

# · , H ,>o" 

# "
. 11" "
.**-~ ~,**  

# " 

# - ''' - , 

# .. ... , ' " /(I" 

## = 00(
. .. ..... . 

## ... . 

# ,." 

# .. , ,,,,,. " " "'10 ' 0Il _1ON



# "" 

# ... • • "", 

# . ." 

# .... , 11 "''' 

# "" "" = 00(. "" ,.,. 

# '''' '0 " 1.1 

# "lP1
. " "..IP"**.~**


# -- .. 001. "'_ '-' , ,on 

# ""." = POI • III o m • :!P. ,"" 1.1
. ,,-,. 10 

# "
. n,." 

# " wllIm , '" III >on 

# '" >0" 7>, ,,1> 

## = 0'-''-'' 1ll 

## .,. .. ,.t< " " 2m, " ll
. >O "


# .**-~ ~"**  ll fl1/>O
.. .,. IP,.U 7 "."'" , . • "O '\ 

## = 01" 1Pll .,. Ill
.. .. " 11 "' '' 

# ,1.1 , "'"


# -

SA·" 1>J"''''1l 

# "' '''lO'' "" "" , 11>0 " 

## = 0 '-'ll 0l1 

# "'."'>0 " 

# .. ". "''' ' 1.1' .>0 " 'lMSWY
.. ..,


# . ", -00 , ' 111 '<'" 

# "'" 

# . '" 

# . . .. H ' .>O B , '1.1 01' 

## = 000
. .. ..,. 1lI 1l. "''' 

# .... 0 ."' '' '" '" >0 " " "'SCITY

... Al ,yi _' 

# - , 00' U" "' '' "",

. 

# "'


# . .... , ,, . "' '' '
. ".>0" = 

# 00< ' '''
_ • "',.u 

# "'- "" ,. ,. on o >o,'

### UN ' T l: :

D S TA T ES 

# '

. " H R.. m ON n :TRoLE UM C O , \IPA

.. 

### \ 'y



## A I'PEN IlI CES TO CONSENT IlE C REE



# A P PEN DIX 2.2

CALCULATING THE TOTAL STEAM MASS AND VOL UMETRIC FLOW RATES AS ADJ USTED BY THE STEAM C ONTRI BU TION FA CTOR AT THE TEXAS C ITY MAIN FLAR E

### APPENDIX 2 .2
CAI ,Cl !L\TIN G TilE TOTAL ST EAM MASS AND VOLl TM" :TRIC " 'LOW R-\TES AS AnJL:Sn :n 

### B \'TItE STEA\1 C ONT RlIJl T T I ON " · A CTUR FOR 

### T ilE TEX AS CIT Y**I\tAI~** 

### FL\R E
E quil lion I : "N oo_M ix in/( T tJtll/ St e a"' f "r T exa s Ci t y ,1 Ua i n f1a rt" o r "S """"'; f/T'C--M,!' : 

### S.,_
.. · 7t" _W 

# - -Ul fix L Il(MFR } t /) ,1 185 

### where : 

## L" JfFR 

# - M omentu m F{ux 

### RtJt ;o Equa li "" 

### 1 :**",** 

### Co ntribution 

### Fa c tor f or Ih e 

### T ex as Ci ty Mll in Fl ar e " o r**SC TC** **..v** 

# "'- SC/- ·W. <f F - / -S "",,_ .. 

### rc. vr X (/
- 

### m s) An d (by vo lume) 

### (k,



# - f- S

.... __ TC ., ." X (/
- 

### wh ere :



# -**J:** 

### T"t al Stc umji,r Tex u,f Ci ty M ain Ha re Cente r Sleam .l la,' .f Flo,," 

### Ra t ..



# - C "nter St ea m Volumetri c FloII' 

### RaIl' Equ lltion 

### J : " Gm t "r S Uum 

### MIll _' 1'1 00
. ' Ra U " " r " ; Q

.... . .r (/ /1 /385 .5 ) 

### Equ ation " Ttl/a' S tea m M O , ff 

### Fl ow R ol l' I II Ad j u sled b y th e Ste am C o n t r i l mt ion Fa ct or f or th e Te xa s C iJy , "' u in Ha n " 

### o r " m .-l/fl't' ,w - ":



# -

m

, 

### T otal St eam M ass F low Ra te Stearn Co n mbution Fact or for the T exas City M a i n F lare

I 

## c r z

### A PPEN IlIX 2 .2
F.q uuli on 4 8: 

### "T olol Sleum V ol um etric Ff o... Hut e 

### II

. ' Adj u . • ted b y th e Ste om C ontri b " t i"" Fa cto r f or t h e T e x" ,' C il)" , W" in**f1or** 

### fi r ..**., ·~:**  

### Q

. xSCF rr; . /.iF

w here :



### Q

. Tot al Stearn Vo lumet ric Flo w Rat e S team Co ntribution Fact or f or t h e Tex as 

### Cit y Ma in Flare 

### [ E nd of Appe ndix 2 .21



### 2o f2Cif\iITEDST. 4TES 

# , .. '110 .'1 Pf:'ROLEl JM CO .\W4l\T



## A IJ i>EN OICES TO CONSENT D ECU EE



# APPE NDIX 2.3

OUTLINE OF PR OTOCOL FO R P ERF OR MANCE OF PASS IVE FT IR TESTING AT RO BINSON FLA RE 8 4-FI

### A) 'I' E NUIX 2 .3

o t**I.I~f.** 

### OF r Rn l"O( OL tOR**PE:Rf OR~I** **A'C F.**  ( If"**P-"~ S1Vf.**  

### n i H. n :sTI 'r. 

### A I**OBI~ SO:'O**  

### n . ..\H.E IU

- '" 1 .0 Tnt Objoct.i\e5 

### 2
. 0 Flare PCTformancc Test 

### :': .1**(h"Cl"'~** 2.2 T o:$! Description s 

### :':
. 3 Tnl Condition Maui"



### .. 0**l.~tioo** 

# s.c PUl a Colle.;lion 

### S

.l T n t R un I.ui! 

### So 2 P FTlR 

### S.J Vi dl:Q 

### 6 .0 Stablluy o f Flare 7 .0 W ind Oire.;ti"n I m pact s Appt'ooi" A : pm R 

### ()pcTatil.>n and C a hb l1>li"n A I Opo:rollion A.1 Calibration 

### Appmdi" U : Camna 

### OpcTatiun and 

### C llhbnlltoo S .l Therma.I- F UR A):': O 

### B .2 Vi sit-Ie

- Ax is 

### QI 7 S S I U A iming C;uneras Appmdill 

### C: Vi sual Emiss ; OfI.1 s(:a1 e [ Eoo o f**A~ j"**  

### 2 .3 )

I 

## «r I

### ( ' S ITEDST ATES**1l** 

### T IIO,\' P ETRO 

# " Ll l'

.H COMI' .,I," ''-



## A PPENllICF.S TO C ONSENT D E CR EE



# APPENDIX 2.4

FLA IU ; P ERFOR MANCE T EST PL AN FO R T il E GME G ROUN D FLAR E B URN ER S AT H IE GA RYV I LLE R EFI N ER Y

## Marathon Petroleum Company , LP
Flare Perionnance Test Plan for the GME Ground Flare Burners Garyville Refinery

Revision 0 .9 JllI1u ar)' 9, 2 01 2**~.** I or 

# ao

### M anllhon Fl are P erformance & 

### M omtunnll Pro tocol Gmund F I IIW 4 

### (j ayv illc**fi l!Cl)'**  

## Ta ble or Co ntents**Inl rtldu** **~lloa** _ __ _ .._ _ _ 

### J Ob j «t i H ••• • ..• _ _ _ _ •._ .. _ _ _ ••_ •.• 5 Tnt L ocation _ .._ _ _ __ _ _ _ 5 Sum mary 

### of Har e 

### "" lru m tnl
. lioo &. Co n I "" S," ltm
_ _ _ _ 6 

### n ar e Pe rformll o ft' l'

_ 

# - - . _ - 

# _ .. 

# __ __ __ 

# , n n t P .rl""**n<** T nt r hlk> 

# p., "**Ob m'**  •

__ ._ . _ _ '1 T
.. , _ _ __ .. __ .._ _ . . __ 7**rnc .d**  Appendi l , \1 PtTIR O(X'uti on aa d C.li hn lla n _ _ _ _ . . II**1'~ ·1** **-1M ~r** **'''n** __ _ _ _ . . __ IJ



### Pag e 2 of 20M arallw n**HII~** P m llm1ll l>C<: T est & M OlUl on n lll ' ml o.:oJ Ground**FI~** - G!Iy\ 'ilk RJ:linm' 

## Introduction Mara thon**~lewn** 

### Company ( MPC) IIU 

### been engllgrd w ilb \he 

### u . s , EP A**il>C<:** m i d · 2008
.. d"l i enfon:emo:n t inltiali ves 0 11**over -~teaminl**  (I f (Jares
.**A~** a n:WII of Ib is

,, 'ark. M I'C 

### tw ntab l ished 

### an o pe rating envel ore to pn>t«1ll'lldil iOOllI 

### uc em-asss ied e levalCd**f1** frum opcrn lint! I"". tha1l1l 8% combuslion e ffielrncy
. M P C w ill en ter in to 1\ C"1bClI1 Decree wilb tb e Un il ro**SUl~** wh ich «"':nall of M PC '. flarg , iodoolllg 

### the GM E Gro ull d Fl a n. . . F or Ibe GatyviJle M aj or h plI nslnn (G ME) G roond f lares , !he ob jectiv e of !he COf\IoCl\I 

### Decree " ' ill be 10 e Sl ab li, b !he p n, p cr ov cr-5 leammg prolect ion, '" w ell as tk'111011. lJale w t ah bou gb 

### \he fiare'l <JPI.' ra l e al hi ll-her e l;1 " eJ oclt i es**ll fTetlll)'**  allownl by lll le
. !he)' 'lilladuev,," hiSh w mbu;{ion e ffi t,;i ency . 

### GllIYvill e constructed t
... 

### c ground l1a1'l:'1 lI$ pttrt of 

### the G ME pro J eo;t in 

### ;!00 8

- 2009 , 

### The t!lUUn d 

# nam. 1:00 .;51 

### "f rrtulnple 

### rows o f**5l '1l~,**  eat,;h havillg \IHllllple bumen per row , The ti['ll l fo ur ( 4) sllll.tC'l on e ach ground flare include slum
... " ist bumeJr. , .... hile SLa ll <:S 

### S and lbove .."**pn:Isun:-as. ~LS**  burnen. T he GM t: North 

### Ground nare has a IO IlI I of 1 0

. La g"" , .. h ile 

### \he S<.lUtlt 

### Ground fl are ha s II 1lIU11 of II 

### "Ulies. F .aeh IwLs an add 'h "na l mainlellall« 

### row . Th e lin l

. m ge of e a ch flare is IIlwly\**in~** The rema imng sl ages arc opened 

### ""-'cd \I ron pI'C '>W'C , " 'ilh ad n n t,; .,.j p l'Ot!: "ll fIJ TlI n , lOKi<: I MI o pens sUl gin g valv es 

### I " wc eeMiv,," .tall" ' Th e**ste am-** **lI~i"'.,.j** bumen arc 

### SK fC bum e f\l, an d pmI !>UIT Il!> SI Sted !lumen are l RGO h um e., .**hg** 

### I : l d\
. - S Ki'C B urner . R ighI

- l R G

O Humer
.

Pagd o f20Mualho.>n Flllre pmormatll. -.l Thl 

### k M onn on ng l'roIocol Ground Hart

- G .,yv ill e Ref lMl) 

### The obj «tl ve of till:**perf~e** lnt 

### i. 10 develop an 

### operanng envelo pe f o r both l he 

### ,",c:am-US l sto:d $la ges all we ll as cumlne**fl~** 

### p<:rformance 00 the 

### p n:,"urc-as" ' t slalles al high v elo.-ity /i .e., >-400 f l / IleC ).**Th~** sl yle of burners perf orm better a t h igher prc<>:ourc and h i llho:r**loc ili** **",** and
.... cre no l contemplate d in e arly flare cffi ci C1K'Y nudie , performed h y C MA a nd f PA
. wh ich f crrn . .. d the 

### bas i. of th e e xit velocity Iimillil tion s i n 

### 40 CfR 

### 1\0
. 111 anoI6) I I Both t he ,leam- a .. i ,lc-U \ SK E C ) and pressuno-assi,tcd 

### ( LRGO I bum<:n ha ve l he pul enli al 10 operale 

### with an exit v elocity above the 400 fti s h mil 

### f Of mlIu: ria ls w ilh he ul c lmlenl "F 1,000 a ·IU I ..: f
. S ecrullin, e xis t thai will res ult in ue steam
l.SIl ;sl
. .. d hUnl o:r.l 

### on Sl llg e I 1 0 be above the 400 

### IV

. vel ,><;ily limiL Th e tes t ",ill mo:asun: c c rebus no n effiCienc y 

## (cm III these hillher velnci lLes 10 ensure the fl lln'**conun~** 10 ellh ibil h igh CE undc:r these condnions
. TIle tes t i s planned 10 be 

### c onducted at llle John link**n~** l "ting faci lily in T ul loa. O klah" ma. Si lC speCIfi c le.ung i. nol l«hm c ill y f eaSlble. 11- < !he vol umes of gMeS needed reach sonic .'e1t><; lty (in e xc ...., o f 1400 ft. 'I ) on the SKEC 'lI an>-ll'S;,. trd and LRG O pre .. ure_"",i sllOt! bum,," 

### ca n not be Ilnw:rl led It !he f ao; il ;ly \MIbidc o f lIII e mergency related relief case . uc h
....**pow ~-OUlllB"**  Of tm'Ier'j!:mO. ')' s huldo"' D o f !he: 

### h ydrocrack e r proces s u nn,Mar;a lhon Fl are P erf o rman ce Tesl & Momtorlng Prow<:ol Ground FllU'l:**aryv ll**  

### Rcfll\Cl)' 

## Ob jective**Th~ o~erall**  objI.'CliVe5 of!he 

### proj«I an: lIS f o llow, : I. 

### 1kmon.!T'aIC thlll the J ohn link L RGO press ure-ass isted and S KEC sreem-assrsted burncn 

### elll1.dll<.·
.. - e 

### oompl i afll,:e with 

### n ecessary cumoo.. !llln e lTlciency requirements III**"'~locill<" ~alcr**  th;m 400 !lis. 2
. Oc.'lcmti"" !he min imum comb ". lion ZlI1IC n et hea ling ulue IN HVcz) thai
.. ill ectneve neccssary wmhu.llon effi cumey l'I.'<lUJn:ments 00 !he LR GO lJ'I"CS'Iure**as.si~l C<I**  burners
. ) , Det ctmi nc l he p roper**'1Clll11-U~iSlcd** operating envelope in terms of combustio n w ne n et helltlng valu e (NlIVul fOf I!x' 

## s ue steam-as ... ted bumf:n, 

## T est Loca lion MI 'C i. propo.ing 10 L-onduct Ibe lClIl allbe 

### J oint li nk n are le.ling faciliTy located in 1"ullll. Oklahoma. In o rder 10 P"'S'CrlY**evalU.1l.~** h ig h ex il ve locil y**pelfOrm iLllC~,**  il i, 

## neo:",saf)' 10 openle bulb !he 

## sue and LR GO b um,," c1mc 10 so nic velccny. Of Mach I (

- 1.400 

### fl. for Tulsa Saluflll Gas). II**;~** nlillUllcd lha t a p pro xunalely 900 mmscfd uf ps would be nl.'Cessa1)' m 10 order 10 p "rf o rm!he Ie-I' atthe Garyville R cfin f/'IY
. nx only s<:ellallOS thaI generule lbis**volwn~** Qf**ga~** 10 8d 10**Ih~** GME Ground nares arc elll<'1'i""CY rchd**~"'** ... such M a pow e1' oul .Se or erTleTgCl1L"}' ,hu ldo,,"o of 

# ee bydroeraeker process I,IIIll , I n order 1 0**,u~~~~.f ully**  c'Oll<lUoCt a bwncr J'CTfaml.llnc:e 

### , ,..... 1

. i l illl«CYiolry 10 withstand lon g 1"''' 00 ' of**.d** n ow 10 

### lbe bumen in a COlIlrollcd fuhltlll

. 

### 8a:a
. .. e only ..b utdo wn or malfunction evenl!l 

### ""ill gcneroue the volumes of g8. 1IC<:CMal)'. il i, nol lec h nically f"", i hle 10 eond
..... 1. the \C">I 

### .t !be lite. Funhcrmon:

. lhe G Mli ground fla=; are OJ"'II nan: f.c.l<b. COVCl'Ulg: sc\fCf8.1 ecres. The GME Nort h ground no>«' c''''ca an azea**of~** th:u1 2**"'~** Th e S<l llth G round fl are coven an MClI of 3 acre'
. Surroundmg each flare io a 4O-foot lalll'lldiallun f enL'e. A. deillil<.'d in 1"0 ground n...... pm;entauon. It the recent A meric an F la me Rc.carch ColloqUIum (Af-' RCj tn«\Ing
. ... h",h 

### Io<>i< place in Il ou" on. lbc air now p a t1 eTnl in llIld around**lh~** l)'pCs of flarn 

### an: dlffieuillo predict. DependIng on 

### w ind . peed and vent**~""** flo w**ral~.** burner pI li,"", IIUI) be s .... - irhng or ""-tfting sig nificanlly
. This comrlicaleS the 

### FT I R "",asuremenl. The Int K1-up
.. - iII be OO Mln
. .. .. 1C d In order 10 Slm u la !e l ite efl'eclS ofllavlna multIple bumca lUj!:ether un a 10
.... ·, F or e ..... h burncr s ty le tesle d
. M PC is proposllllllO IeSl a sen", of lhTce similar bunIC rs on the**1larrl~** manifold
. This will sim u laleS lhe eff«l of mulliple bumen; rathI:r lban the 

### p<...-fu1TIIlIm;e of a si na-Ie 

### burn er .

Pllg:d of20Mara lhuo flare PmontllUlce Te.lt 

### & M on itoring Prooxol 

### Ground 

### Rare GlIl)"o'iUe Rermt:ry 

## Summary of F lare Inst rume ntation & 

## Co ntro l System John Zmt T

... ,1 F ac 'ifity 

### &/ Vp 1lle nare leot C<j lli pmel11 to be u..ed in the M I'C Inl 

### consists ofa f uel "'wly ,yolcrn,. fud m etenni**sy~I(m,** . IClIIm .opply**s~ctn,** ,team Ill\:lm nll system, .team auilllcd llllJl: 

### \.Ips. prc"'ure lIU i.tcd fWe lIpS
. fud 

### rrsaruf cld, and a data acquisition I)"tcm
. 

### The Slearn a"'tsle d 

### f1are Up" llJl: k>hn Zink model S KEC
. lbi. t i p dc-.;tgn ha... a configurat ion for tnJ ecting slum 

### around Ihe perim e ter o f lhe fu d d ischarge , lb. = lips
.... ill be 

# rll'ed simultal1C'OUSly 

### from lhc 

### same mani fol d. 

### The manifuld 

### cunliguration all ow . 

### a<lj ll . ttne'll 10 !be spacing of IIM:;lc: ups . The SKE C l i ps "ill ha\'C !be same .pa<:in g as the S KEC t,1" in'lalled a l 

### the ground Ilar e. II .ingle nalural J!
.. p ilot i'lL w:d o n one o fLhe end bumcn The pn:.;oure assi .te d n an: l iJ'i llJl: J ohn Zink modcl l ROO , Th
.. li p design usn no aloSi
... medi a and a d t1 eves .mokel"", combu.tion by making**mcienlll~** oh lte .\'ailable fuel pn'ltourc
. Thc sam e manifold utiliad for the S KEC b urncf ' will be used 

### fOi the lR GO burners. The lR GO " ill be In.talled " i lh the same 

# 'fOlIC'"'" Manlhon L RGO burners
. II . ingle tUlural 

### ps pilol 

### "til be u';Cd on one of the**end~** Note ; Puc to fuel1t m,ta \mllS. only Ihree bu m en w ill be Ins talk d <lIllhe IMnifold al any one li me . The Jo hn Zmk da ta acqwsitlon syste m (OAS I w iJlautomatlcally l og 

## ee fullu wing parametcn durinll each le.t at a I I II iIall1ple f rej umc y: Pa
. ame '., I n rtru men U li o n ThO Flu'" Orift« Pille wnh pre!<"utllllnd t emp e rature compeasauon Nitrogen Flow Orifice P Li le wnh f'C'll".urc 

### and lem penuurc oompcmarion Steam F low Ullr.bon ic flo", meIer W i pt\'>L1
. &. l emp. compcns.atlOll F la re Tip Fuel**~!IUJ'e** 

### Press aee**an. ~tIll** **tt** F lare 

### T Ip Fuel 

### T emp . Thcrm Q<:Oll p Je 

### Flare T ip 5team Pressure 

### T r an. 'm itter Flare 

### T ip Steam 

### Temp
. Th crmoc O<t l'le Wind Speed &. Duecncn Wmd M on,tor I:t l rumdn <; Pressure HllrtlmclOc 

### f'rcorurc 

## s.:n_ Ambll:nl T crnperalllU T ell1f'C1'lllule I::lcmcnt lI umi dity W Cl ther SlatIOrt See attache " P &. lDs fo r l es l ttluipmenl configurauon
. A Il '"' analy li, ,, ·ill be performed to**~alidate** fuel 

### r:omposrtioo. A GC a naly Sl ' serv ice

.... tll be provided by a lhird-patty**I~ting** company . Th e 

### data 

### from lhe GC**IlUlly~il** w ill 

### be logged by !he IC\lillft COffip"ny's typical loggmg equrpeent 

### and**,, ~ll**  no! be includ ed in 

### the lZ data Ille
.



### P all" 6onO... thoo H Olle I'erfuml<mce T.."t & Monoto nnll Pnnocol Ground flare

- Garyvi lle Rri"tn<:ry 

## Flare Performanc e Test Fl are P erforman ce T e st P h il oso phy & 

### Obj ect Ives lhe primary objecti ve of Ibe flllJ\' P"'"fonnance tes t i. tu dcmomtnl te thai the Ilurner-. Install<'d al the Garyv ille G MI: G round F lare! perfurm III a hiEh le vel of c:omb us llon effi ci ency e ven III**e~ it**  v eloc ities greate r than 400 

## n. "s This pelfornw>ce te .1 f ul fill. th e mjU 'n:metl 1S o f Paragraph 31> 

### "I' t he C<lIUCllt !>e<:n.'t\ Passi ve f Ti R will be u lili:t.ed to 

### mea sun: the 

### eurnbu. <ttun efficieocy duling ao.: h I n t coodilion.. 

### T

est P rocedu re

Ove n l ew A mixture " fnaluntl gas and nitrogen al vanouo c om positions and flow ntes ,", ',II bt' in truducctl int u l he 

### fl arc as shown in Tab le 2
.**Si~ I~",lo**  ha v e bel'll defined for th ili p ro gram ali dC!l ilP\8t<'d 

### belc... , During each leol cono lillOl1 the p mR will mtl<.Ilcl y analYlc the l'l:'liuJ unll rombus tiun 

### gases In 

### the ttere plume Iu de temulIC comtlllstion efficiC!l0'
. 

### The rcsull
... ·i

ll be a Ikfin cd 

### n arc upc:n tin g envelopc 

### ever • variety of 

### c ondtri ons, T ft. 1 Seque nci ng 

### Each test 

## smn ill con ducled with a di ff ere nt te's l 

### gas composition 

### or flow lat e. W ithi n e.,.;h tn t. the N HVel o r NllVvllw ill be vamd as specIfied belo w an d in T able 2
. The objectives for each leSI arc a li fo il"
.... : Tn ' S "li 1 Stu m_a s.I.1 hu m en . 100 % T u l sa n a l u ra l!:
.. . Ohjeclive J

.. T o del cn",_ I Ittt /Wrjor"",nce Cl l "'" of 1M j1<"... lip '" ,Ittt M"e 1<JtJd flo .. ' Nl e, Ohj a:, i .'C 1
. £Stab/ish .' cum ha
.. · lm
.. 10 t: om f'<U"" K.,h " i rrog.t" <1I / "I i"" i " 

### Te s, 5. 

### v : V ent**p.** 

## no.. . wd l bt' a t the t Yr ica l bs.c load 

## no...- rate (-4 fl lS« e x it v elocil)tl.
.... ary!learn assi.t lllltialte <l f;OIloJ ,lion 

## "" , 11 be at the ml lllmum ilIt'l1m nte (cooling Slea m tale j , S ubl.equen t lest oond lliuN will i ncrease th e Slellm to !>Chieve suec"" ,"ve ly 

### 10 1' <:'\' 

### N II
.... 

### cr v alues unti l 

### a ,;ombu.u un cffit: ietlo-y of <93 "_ 

### ii mo:as.urcd. 11Ic .tea m rate w hich ac hi eves < 9 .1 % 

### CE will bt' the fma l cond ltiun of this series
. I nc S .''t;2 Slea m -a .. l.l h urn r n. 1 00 % 

## n.. ... .. a lura l jl.lllnlt rog r n m i l Objet:II""

. To , k /o' ".,i tfC 'f n itrogl'll di l"twn L ind .I/. 'am dil"' ion Iun

... I II.!

. w m e effi- 'L'I " " ct lmbll.<l HHI qfici e "9' I n thr wluclly**lII** t l:!l ls, both liI ram a nd ni trogen .... 111 be u.<ed ID maintain a 

### llUJI:cl N llV c.t. Thi
. l es t lk lenlllllt.
...... hclhc r <IlU a .. ump tion Ihat n ilrogm and .team ha ve <:q uiv!I""'l effects 

### i s c -O

rKCI. N IlV C l ... i ll be**I~** by d ilution w ith 

### nitrngcn i n . tcp>. 

### from 300 Bu." ':lCf(m in imum 

### steam C'lu ivalcot ' to t he 

### perm a t w hIch 

### combusl ioo effiCIenc y 

### tln>p'l bel o .... 93 %. The curv e fru m lhis**t~** will 

### be ", ·ith th e c u rve f rom SS I
. 

### Thcrc 

### w ill be no I'CJl linle ru ns for th i\ l est.



### .o .a P age 1 of 10M aral hon Flare P erf o rmanc e 'r es t &**on lO** **ri lj.**  P rotoc ol 

### Ground 

### f lare - Garyville R ef mcry 

### T H t VS I Slnm -n sl , ' bu rners . 

### " . Jod t ) Scr

... " ln g l' C'" ObJectiw : T o 

### iJ""rify a rough orm"",g 01

...... s h", .ing**Ih~** I/NU CE af <I ju nction of nit w!'/City a nd
.... H l'cz, 

### TIli, 1.,1 wi ll**"tab li~**  

### a wugh opn'alinlll'tglon to be mod 

### for Tcsz VS2
. Th. t e sl W Ill be gi n a l ronie**eloci ty.**  100% T ulu natural 

### gu (-900 B tu/se O. a nd no , learn 0< nilrogcn dil u ti on ( minimum 51"", o m . S li Va wi ll be lo ,," "re d in 1 00 B l l1 ' liC f incre mclIls thIough 51Cl\f11 

### and ' or nltrot!cn dilution unlil 

### com bustion e fficiency KE ) drops be low 9llV •. 

### AI!hio p o in t. Nl JV ez will be h..l d con,llln i ...hile exn " elcxlly**~a\CS** In 1 00 

### f p " increments.**Thl~** ... 

### ill continue 

### unul CE**ri~** 

### above 

### 91l%. AI this poin t. the c ycle repe ats
- holding CJl.il**~doc1ty** CUIIolan l and**~1I1l!** N IfV <; z l1J1 til 

### the ncx l 

### Hcrossovcr" pornl Ibm holding N1 I Vez rono.tanl a nd**dccreasin~** e sit ,'c1cxity, Tho 

### proccdufto will be rtpClllcd l1J1til mini mum (bK>.c line l uil velocity i s re ached- At ex h po inl, !be N1IV<;z
H and n il .'eloc ity 

### w ill bc '1un<:d 10 dial in I m OR 98 % CC poi n\. The end fftu ll lII ill be a senes nf polnts deflmn g the 9 !l% CE curve ... I 

### fun. 'lion o f esil vclocity and Jli Il Va

. 

### f Of thio rough 

### KR'aling**l~** NnlI will 

### be I min imum of 1 0 

### minwe.. in len gth 

### wi!h no replicates, 

### 1'
.. 1 YS2 Sl um .... i .' b um en . V eloc i ty SC r ..... I Dg Tnt Ol>jt'<'liW" r"**~,"al>li..1t** a robwl opet<>ling am"" SJro"'lllg lite 98% CE <rI llfunclion 

## of**~;ril** wlne!1y and
. Il, 'H Ve:- 

### A l each of!he 

### "crossover" pomts identifi.:d in Ttsl VS I. fu1l 2o-minute ICSl 

### ron...... ith replica les
.. ill 

### be conducted A I 

### wvo:ral poin ts, CUIV'e §Cfl5111 ' ny .... ill be dctmnlnc<J by !IaRI phng 

### al opcra llng condit ions sligh lly 

# abo, '" and bclO'" lhe rune . 

### The numbe r of sensuivity points
.... d l be Ue lcnninc:d by ho
.. many**~'fOS-",~cr** poInlllllle i den tI fi ed Sensitivity po mts 

### Will be. mInimUm of 1 0 

### min ulcs with no replicates. T
.. I PAl**rr l!\.u** **.ul"** burn e n. T u l • • D ll u ra l X :II I D il rog e n mil, Obj«Il<vr ' 

### r 0 

### ae'<77fti>lflIM mi,"m"m "'llVa Ilral " "P f'< .r/£ gnod cmnb
.. ..,ion <J11onic**.~/udty** Operalion al mexrmum (sonic)**~elocily** ( -13 p ll ur>ds press ure) II multi ple 

### "enl gas MIV<;:z.. 

### l mual lC< 1 wndilJon"'lll 

### be I OO"!" T ulsa 

### nalural ga s (lIIV " 906 BI" .cO ,**Sub!lcqUCT1ll~** <;ondil ion
..... ill mdd**Ditmg~n** 1 0 

### LIte fuel 10 reach """-cc"",, ely 1 0... <:1 N H Vez vatu
... s until a 

### combustion cffieiClll.'}' of<93 % 

### i ii mc UU tN. The 

### eomposilion w hich echieves <9 3 0 ,. CE "'111 be !he final rruxrure of thl' lest lIC n cs T n l 1' ,' 2 Ptc'
..**u~** ... I .1 bu
.... e n . h i
.. " I 'ura l XU 1**lt "ll** **~n** mil
. Dbj«ln",, ' Ta dclermi .... lh.- mimmum NIfVc: tlml .mpporl .•Rood COIIfMl.1/imt 0.1 mim m"m v.dodty**~uon** lit mllum um**~GI** ... ily (-4 po unds p ress ure}al mu llir le venl gao N HV<;L 

### Inmal 1es1 condmon 

### will be 100% T u ba IUllUnilll '" ( lI IV "' Q(H; BIllisd)
. Subsequenttest condmens 

### w ill . ,ld nitrogen I" t he fud 10**""h ~1ICCCS5i'cly**  l o... u SHVel vIlue:. 

### unnla co mbustion e tlici,",l<:y of 

### <93 ,-. is measured Th e 

### composlllOn ...hieh**ac ie.'e~**  ", Q3% CI:
.... 111 

### be Lhc final m iXture' of this 1
.. 1 

### -.:ries
.


### .01 P age II or 20MafilthoJ ll F la' e**eT** Test '" M
..... i turillg Prol<ll: ul 

### Groun d**ll«l** 

### - Gal)"' ill e R efinery A ch\....,k
.... , ill .lso 

### be perfQl'Tlled comparrn g p iloted v , u np,loled burners 1 0 determine 

### "'Ilelhe, 

### combu' llon effi ciency differs si gnific llIIlIy

_ I n f

ormation f rom ti ll" leSt 

### wi ll be u se d l o a, sure**~II La** **livc** 

### pmR 'I;lffiplillg 

### "fthe**~plum**



## Test Matri x 

# "n vsr ' P Al ' 

# ,., '
SK E, S KEC**SI(~C** l R W H ; I OIW
. TNG ' TNO ' ,... , .... TN G ': N , In; " TN o'lN , "'

.. lNG ' , ,!,; , ,,,,,, ThG ' ,':'< , "'
.. , .... _; Uo n U u " f. '"**\' .~** **,.** "

.. I \ '. I<>aly**I"** N ' A 

# .... 

# - '
... m " , r 

# .1\._ ' 0-

- lJ Ib 

# -- 4 "
V ul .bl
. For.m
.. . ., . , l lti ! 

### , ...... n.... " II V •• 

# -
... N""'F'I Flo

.. N IlV • • (1 "" .,:( hit " o""' ur ' NHV Q Il

l"'" n h>' ",r hOI " . k>cuy l 

# "II "

... o - 

# _ 

# .. N urucc> 

### no. N IIV

... 

# Il ,,,, ' ''''' N llrogcll 

### n"", N il " '"


# .. '"

T n t P";a ' •**"~.** '100 O
.. .. <f 

# . . ........., 

# . ..**~,.** h OI Poi.. , ! H O ' 

# , ,.,.**~,~** 

# ...... 

# - r: ..... _ ..**~.,** T , .. P o,.. ,)**~,~** J " " """"
.... 

### -ee ' 

## '00 ' tee' 

# '""" 0000: " 1"_ 

# ..

. .. ......., 

# ..... s... 

### rn' h OI 1' " 1"' 'W '**~'** 000'**.,** lln< np """ So< T O>I J. COVOOO>\'Cf T n ' ' .1"" 

## . 00 ' , 00' 

## ' 00 ' 

## '00 '**~,.** O 'o<" pI>OfI T

.. . ' ''; a' , 

# ,.,. " 

# . ...-.. 

# .. . 00 ' 000 '**,.** 

# "'""- "<Us-


# , , lu i

... N.,",
. I 

### n .. .. _ R""oc1" @Io8Of 

# , C """" Ke," "" p reo. .... "" lei, 

### I "'

.... <O<IIIN>,,

_ 

### em ".... .,. l; 

### 9l' 'o
. T 01>1 n umoo " r ..... 

## 1"'''' '' '" be
.......... lDOd bo oed on .. .. m u llo and
.... 

## r "W)' 

# • The <om tnul._ I<'rte
... _ .... ,""", on tbo
. .. i. l bunt<n _ill in<l lld< ' ho "'" Ji" n<f

.... t; n ... . 1 "" _ m y """",I
.. u _ from th , p, I", • . Ta hI r 2
. TC 5 1**Matn~**Maralhon**nl~** Pmomutn<:e TC"1 

### & M onilorHlg Protocol 

### Ground F"Ian: - Garyville R efinery T n! Pr oclldu
.... Two P F TlR In.'trumcnls wtll be 

### used , ilUale<! 'I 90" fro m the tes! man ifold 10 allow 

### f(lf IlttUrille plume 

### ""JTI.I'ling of 

### wind diroction. Each instrume nt 

### will be uhbr.te d al the beginning and 

### end of <"lien**t<:~t** da y. The durallon of**~h** _ run will be .pp n ,,,imalc1y 20 lTUout"" (neludmg tllne for p mR u.y 

### bIockgrounds) , The 

### PFT IR is c ap ahle ofanalytinll multiple spc<.:tTl pe r 

### mmase . 1'lten'forc. 20 minutn p"T It'St "Ooolt;Oll 

### pm,·1des ample urne for a Slahle mea5UJ"Cmml at 

### each te,;! c"ndition
. 

### E
.... h tesl """"ilion 

### "'ill be evaluated f o r u..l a Quality pnar 10 mavin' 10 

### the ne 't! lesl. Eaeh I
... , condition ", ill be l'q'Ilicaln! 

### thn:e limes for _101.81 testttme It 

### a specific tC!;l condition 

### er eo minutes. T o the exlent JIO'i'..iblc. rcplic lllC"l n.utJ will be. cund",,\l:d on different days in OrOOT to capture any unwntrol1ed van.lion (e.g, wind) II (jC anal1";' will be 

### performed pr w r 10 

### the**~t an**  "fthe t;tl;t rep licale of. lest ,;u"dlliOil
. 

### Once the 

### GC ana lyl;' 

### is complete, the**te~l ~itlon**  

### l imer**", ll**  St :tn. t\ear the 

### end of each lesl run ano th<.'1 fud eomposiucn anal)";. will be made 10 vllidat<:**~Iabk** opcmion. Ooce I leM run i. complete, the procn. eundttiom wlil be. adju;ted fur the nUll"" run 

### and the pm.;edUI'l: stans again
. E ech t
... t
.. 

### · ill begin atkT

_ 'hllie now**i~** achieved, the 

### hea der Iuu; 

### heen**p~ed.,.;!It** 

### three 

### vohunn of 1M and. GC analy.i.1uu; validated fuel enmpo.;llon
. P F TlR Jata will be Ii>gglld into 

### the 

### dati. lI«(Uisilion sysl mt IUppltn! by 

### the PFTlR conUa<:IOT. The 

### rq>UI'IC'd values
.. 

### ill constitute an ."'''ge of 

### ..,, 'era! analytical**ey~ln** ( W I:J eachles
. pt.'nI.ld.- 

### l >u nns each test, both**~en** ,as

_ nd ,te"m 11",", ",tes
.... ill be meallUred**cOTll;nllOu~ly** Iktmn;nalioo ofmolecull11 weltPtl of the flare ps ... ill je provided by gas atllllysil 

### A L onS T em> 5mbilil) ( l TS) te.t 

### will 

### .Iso be completed once C'D<;II <1.II.y under the NII'C 

### OlUl1 operating ccnditien. The purpose of this lesl i.. to derertmne 

### tbe repeatahllily**of ~·** **IR** mea.mrements O\ 'cr lUl ntendc d I"'nod ThIS Icot may 

### also provide informatIOn O il the eff«:ts of Ilfll'(lntrolled**van abl~**  sucb
... "" llld on the 

### overall test**~sult** Al"' , if pmsible , 

### a rclati,'e IICCUtltcy**~heck** againlt • IO\II1:e w,th

_ CO llCO ('F.MS
... ,11 be <XJndudn! prilll' to lhe starl oheating. lfwind cond,tlOns .Uow a 

### good view of the fiare pl ume: from both PrT 1R instrun,enL' , 

### data 

### will be collected from both I" allo,", a detemtination of mdho.llI precision
.



# ••Ma ratllon Flare Performance T "" I &. M Ollll on oll Protocol 

### Ground Fla re . G a ryville Re flllCl)' 

### Data Coffect ion D uring th e tnt program. th e f o llo"' i n g orcntmg J>aralllCtltn w ill 

### be me a,urc:d and 

### repo l'tCXl i ll 1M lest 

### re porl:

rp>

### --~t Unit -.l-. 

### Frequen cy """"\ lbihr Conlm lklU!i I Ib

i hr

_ Conlm......... I Ib/hr Corlllnuous

"' ill Con tinl.ll.>m o

f Contin uous P "I! 

### Conll n"O Il.'!i o f Cont inU< , us 

### VIlJWu- ,,- Conti nuous 

# -I vol ". 

### P erio dIc 

### '«11° (.**nu<>u~** 

### Con t in """. 

### Pa rametef

_ TNG \ lass f lu '" 

### k ale**NI~** . 1 0'" ka le S team M a .. H
...... R ate H arc 

### 0...**Pr ""**  at Mani foltJ rt are Gas Tem perature at M a n ifo ld St eam rn:,., un: 

## . t**nl ~ n**  fo hl St Cll Ill T emperal urc a t IlUInl fold**Mc l~~,ro** **lo al**  Dat a H!'fC
. C o tll {lO' i ll<>n IV;' GC)

_ 

### Flare G as C"tI1JI<. lSition**(~18** flu
... 

### melers l F lare Ex il Velo£il) Tab l e 4
. Opera ting 

### P """ ll C'lC rs M ctL<IITC'J Du rmg 

### T esnn g I n addi tion 10 thC' 

### l1arc and steam opcrati nll I"l ra nlclc l'1> listed a bove , the fol "'''' ;nll da
.. 100 -; 11 also 

### b!: lXI 11 ected d uring 1M le, t pro llnllll , 

# n

""" R" "'JrJ of**F~** f1am." lhaing the tC"ls

. v ideo l't'Conh "'i ll provide**lll** mforma tion retated 10 the 

### pcrfontlllll« of the con trol**l~ :m**  M ultIple vide o camera s 100 

### ill be
... "Cd 10 reecrd 1M .ppc .... nc.". oftlte 

### fll\l" e flame , V i deo**ca "",~'**  .... i ll 

### be co-kxated wlm the I II. camera, descnbed a.; w ell U wnh thc pmk I n t b i s 

# "'.y
. the video front the c am eras "'ill p rovide 1M "' ''l e pcno pl'C1ives as the**inf~** opt ical**dc\ "i** **c~** .... hich w ill b<,: ""e ful in de term imng t h'" contn,l s y, tcm JlCff o. m aru ;e lI$ lO el] as for**.n~** r equ, R'd**lrouhl~ ~hoottng.**  

### The 

# C, In"""" l ocBu:d W Ith tbc 

### p mll.

... i ll CB rt lll'\' th e \'it'W o f the na rc f rom the Pt T1R**pm; jII."C** **ti~** AU CllmeT&. data ""ill be caplll rW and B n.:hi..-'w Local W eal "" ,. C onJ lI;,lnS W ea ther**-orul ll** **on.** 

### " ' ill 

### be recorded for a ll te sts. Weather dat a .... , 11 be measurc:d 

### I>y fllCll ity 

### "'eath
..... SlatKlns CllrTmtly el i"'ing allc;t fw;i h ncs. Ca p tured do ll "ill ,nc;lude :

• 10 

### ttld speed UId d lred,,'n
• ambient tC'lllf>ellllun: 

### • .l!llOSJ'I>eri" preuUI'\' 

### °**um idi** **t~,** 

### ° s ky cOlldmons ( sunny 1cloud) ' I by hand 101



### Page II or zo

## Appendix A : PFTIR Operat ion and Calibration PFTlR Operafion P_i"e F ccner TlZll sform lnframl (l'fT 1 R/ anal ysis 0 l'ml1"" on pl'lllCi ploe of sp<"Clr1Il analySIs of 

### ttw:rma.l rndia lloP**emi n~.,j**  by hot**S"~** In normal**~rp1;on .pec~o** **Jly ,lighl**  

### i

. pmMld !hroogb a**~gion** c onta mlnll 

### iU 10 be lIllllIy ud and !h oe tran. m;lled lighl ; s 'l'"'ad 001 into a .pa:11UnI using an i n lt'ffern meler ( m k ) or I
. pectro m eter. I n 

### !hi
. ' peC1 N m, the**~"""** of 

### "l'l'Cific co m flO uOO' can deh:n11ln N fro m Ihe pallemJ ofligb! Ihwfbcd wb ile t h e compo und' . concenrrenons e lll be: mca,u red fmm th e m ten. ily o f the pIIlkmS, 

### Tbc low en ergy of i nfrared hglll is aMo rned m y molecutar 

### "l'l'C in causi ng!h<:m to vibrate an d !Vlale 

### flL'll""' , B ee ...... COIl:h molecule con si.ts of
. lIII iq uo:**~Iruc",",** of bound llIom •. the palll:m5 of infrarN**~e a18** **th** 

### ( I k col on) 

### absorbed by 

### a molecule ar e 

### al
... W1 ;quc, Tbes<: 

### molec ular
" lin g er prinh "**~..-;l** i n 

### the**II ana**  o f 

### gaoei , T o m on itor 

### 11a= , I1lIndard ab.<orpllon infrared**pC'~1~** could 

### be u sed. However il 

### I
. difficult to pass 

### an llIfTan: d light beam through 

### an etev ated nan: p hllne 

### and th en c. ptur"C' the Illll\$m l
.... 

### ton. F ertur urtely , a pas . i\c apJIf"OllCh I S possible
. l'as s;"c m eans that no " IoC n ,'c" infrnn:d light SOlU\:e 

### i. used I nSlead, 

### the 

### hot gas<:!' o f Ihl;" na rc: 

### an: Ihl;" 

### ", fram:!!<:>UTCC
. The 

### s pectrometer is I 

### rece rver only , Thi. apprtlflCh**i~** pvs.ible**bet.;.~** 

### Ihe inf rvod mdu>tio n emitted by 

### hot gil$C'S 

### Ila.
. rhc: wne pancrns or finllerpnm. llli 

## tnetr absorpIlOO s pectrum doe s. CooS<;qllC'luly , oo.nving a 

# nan: With 

### IIlI infl"ll'C'd in.trulPC'l>t all""", 

### for identificat ion and 

### quan llfio;lllion o f "PCCie- 

### t hrough C1I1;';;;oo 

### ; pet: trost. -opy jll'iI 

### a . Ibllorpl;on 

### spect rcsccpy can . Ho wever , 

### then: rs one mai n diffcroence : the
. i8""lun: llI1sinll from a 

### hol ga s 

### i , proponiooallo lhe lla.-es**~un~~nlrllllon** AND**to;~** IC'TTIpCT llUrC To 

### do**Ufl** 

### o r rad,ancc me".i'>1IRTI\C11IS 

### therefore. the lempcra1Ure m llSl 

### be: deduced III addiliult 10 

### the gu**oocm rtlt** **ons** 

### When a 

### PFT IR IS 

### usN
... lUI**cmi .~ion**  

### monitor it"**~a1ibrtllo:d** 

### In at>so llllc radiance 

### UnLI • .**Th** t:a l im tn 

### the OU !pllI**til g c**  of the instrumen t 10 the received PUWC'T per uni t arett o f 

### soun:c . per IIIIJI", lid an glc of ub!<oeT\lll i,m.lIld per u o;, \\ ' ncl cnll!h or wne 

### nun 'ber**'i cm~** **cr.ul Il** **IT >i** **nu bc** **rJ** Th i s ClIli h ration Il'>C S a b1.ck bod y 

### so un; c. A BlloCkbody is an ob jec t IIlaI ; . pc: rfeclly absorbUlg throughou t thc in frared , If a body is pc:rfectly a bsorbing, the P lanck 

### radialiort la
... · 1l" 'C'I!he JKl\\C'T emitled by thi. blid y, wben 

### bot. Th is 

### la w states IM I the emilSi oo of. b lloCkbody 11 • g iven abwlutc: I
..... pcr .llln:, 

### T
. and weve number, \' , is gi "C'l1 by :

H ere h "I' la nd ' s c oo!.lan t, c t he speed o fhg hr, and k Btlltnnanll's c onstant. Thi s functiOll 

### l ook. li ke th a i S h<;>

.... T1 

### m Figurc 8-1 

### at a t cmpc:ra l>= of 200 

## ' c. A s lhc
PIg<: 

### A - IM arathon Fl are P C'ff orma llf;C T l:lIl &. Monnonng 

### Protoc ol Gruund F lw-e

- Garyvillo:



### ' '''"P'' ntture noes , lbe pe ak 

### or**thi~** 

### fUIK:'Km moVe5 to ward l aIl':er 

### w ave num bt: I1I**~rnall "T**  w .. ' elen glll) lind i l 

### w.:rn!ift in inl<.'ll,ity

_ 

### fur th is 

### re 3. <;()lI
. holltt ob Jecls
.. i ll emil 

### mo n: in 

### the rJ\OfI wl"e]enllllls o r vi.ible
... · lIile
.... olcr hodi l:ll emit in 

### the lon ger wavelen g th' u r t ile infntml



### ., 70 

### E SO

" 40

## ~30 2<J 

### 10



## c 

# o ' 000 2000 3000 

### 4 000 Wave numbe r s ( em- t)

H l!un ' 8-1. Planck " "n di nD Sh o"i llg l h e Rad ia 'in n f : m lll ed by
. RI" c k hod y a l 100 

### "C


### If 

### a body i

. n<Jl '"tIladl e M or \<lI.IIlIy 

### aboorb ina:. l he enc-rgy il e mn , i' JU' ! 

### the Planck function t,mn ,be body 's abS<'l'J'lion For "sample. If the bod y is**tl"! .a!>lIOm** **ing** i t "'ill emil 50% of the r lanl;k fuoctllln
. {i asn**~ve** highl> ' vana!>le ab"O 'l'lIon ", ·,th ""II\ 'cl ..ngt h
. h 10 In fact thi$ varial"'" thai produ. :n tbe IImorp,jon ra ltern, tha i a llow f o r lh elr i d cnli l1 catio n In the infllltC d
. 

### If ' h e lr.In.mlO.ion of al a. i. g l' en by t ( v, n then II • nv , Tl] ,s the emoum of abwrp lion The ra d ia uon the ,la. em i l. all elll pera lure T is t hen 1Ii"en by , ""(v. n - II - f(v, Tl] · 

### N.,,(v,n I'or nant meaSllntmCll t" it i. this ,;g "al**lI"u ~.**  bein g dCl«ted fmm the hoI 

### poe. above t he CO mh l"lion 

### zone . Howe
.. et. t h ere IItC a lso OIbe! contribuuons 10 the sign.al an analyzer k Kn

_ M At shown i n h gurc B -2 , t he bac kground ll}'rieally the sk y l ha v some: 

### "m iuion. &I

.... 

### dcfLned by equation 

### 2 l lha ' when IftnSmitled through the plwne and the interveninil atmosphcnc LS .ec n by the**an ~r**  

### The plume emtrosion s transmmed throusJt \II ,s ... me aunosphcri cMarathon Flare Performance Test &Monitoring Protocol Ground Flare

— Garyville Refinery path provides the signal of interest. The intervening atmosphere itself has some emission, which is also seen by the analyzer. The total radiant signal received then consists of:

I ~. Tare' .. ,. Radiance

- -~► _~~,

Atmospheric li~ Transmission

& Radiance

Figure B -2 Contributions to the measured flare radiance that must be accounted for.

Nroral = N6rzg * tijlr * tiaa~ +NAY * tian~ + Narm +Nf~ (3~
In Equation (3) the arguments v,T have been dropped for clarity and the individual terms are: N,otal =total radiance Nbkd = background sky radiance 'L~,- =flare transmissivity 'Lunn= atmospheric transmissivity N~1,. =flare radiance Nat,,,= atmospheric radiance Nf = radiance of the FTIR instrument itself

Page A -3**tanllbon** 

### F lare P enurmance T es! &: 

### M onitoring Pro tocol Ground 

### fl

... - Garyville R ef llla)'
The k1ua.1 me ...**~mmts** performe d by the PFTIR c ons IS t of t he r olfowmg: M ro • n." m ea.un:d plume rildiartc<, given b y ""l uatio n ( 3) M • ., 

## n... m .. 

### u un'd b ..c kllw u nd 

### radian ce l akeJI by m oving ue p m R o fTth
.. 

### fl lln 1 0 monilor the**ky** ba c kgro und. Th
.. is g IVen by

M • ., A m eaouremcnt mad 

### e l ooking at the c ali bra t ion so urce**(~below)** W Ith a enid (li qui d ni ln 'llen) emiller in 

### p lace Oflh 

### e oormaI (black body ) M

.. • A n lca .u rem cnt made loo king at the calibrat ion SOUI'Ce
... ,th a 

### com mercial blll<:k 

### bOOy
.. miller m \he 

### soun:e t

_ - M easured IIm ",phenc plIth tnlns mlO.ioo

B ased on !hue**m<:lL<u~nu** F Aj\lll Il(lfl (3 1 can 

### be reamm lled to give the p lume l runsmISslo n as; 

# (· ·( A f e - M. I- N : · T_ 

# •**M.- 4.)** **T_** 

# ''J

hI 

### this oq\llll ion.1bc:**,u pe~pl**  011 

### th e P l anc k funcl ion**nod~** ( N....) d etll'les lha l !his 

### is the P l anck funcllon 

### computed I II the ltmp«alure of th e Ilan:. 

### C I S a cahbrutioll meawremmt madt'
... 

### i th 

### a bTad. body calibratlOll 

### soe rce . The callbratl<Hl 

### ><lUree 15 a \.elncope idrnl ica llO 

### that uf 

### tbe pm R 

### buJ WIth tbe c apllbllily o f IIsi ng \ 'lUllJU S radia tion soerces, for 

### C the rad ialion WUl'Ce IS a COllUlltl'\; iIJ bl .ck 

### body**~il1er** C**th~." bcco**  ... the P lanck funct lOO for the ltmp«alun: 

### of the: bta.: k 

### body dwided 

### b y the meas ured 

### radiance lrom the cahbnllion 

### socrce nus 

### f actor comer'l> 

### t he m R "o llag<:s to n ulJaIlee units 

### and i t is Ili\cn by : 

# • N

. , 

# '"

The measured black body radIance ( M
.. ) has th c col d so urce n",.IIsure mem ( M
. I



### , ubtracted to 

### c.meel enu .. ions f rom the 

### ; n 1<,nC nlllg 'ur**"d:or** l he 

### P FTlR m.trumcnl 1l)<'lf 

### A tmosph"";C trans mi
.. 

### ion t
... 

### is also**m~asured ~inllthe**  

### c alibration WUI'U , In 

### th l' c aw th e blad bo dy 

### is**""Plac ~d**  b ) ' 

### a sla ndar d infrared 

### source 

### and th e mea'w-o:mcnl i

. 

### nllldc 11
• path le ngth roug.hl)' c<J oallo 

### thai o f1hc slanl- path f rom ' he P FTIR to 

### the 

### l1arc , A tmt><ph.."c nansnussicn i s 

### then g ive n 

### by ;

P age A4Marathon Flare Performance Test &Monitoring Protocol

Ground Flare Garyville Refinery

1Yl lR —lYl n (6\ 

### 2a7m T ~ 1

to MIR is the measured signal from the calibration source using the IR source and Mn is the measured cold source as defined earlier. The only term not defined is Io. This is the socalled synthetic background. It is frequently used in open -path FTIR measurements to convert a measured spectrum to transmission. It represents the shape of the spectrum that the PFTIR would measure if no gases were present. It can be synthesized from the (MIR
— Mn) measurement by doing a mathematical fit to points in the spectrum known to be free of molecular absorptions. An example is given'in Figure B -3. In this Figure, the bottom plot is the measured spectrum (here a relatively clean spectrum done in the laboratory), the middle plot the points chosen for fitting, and the top plot the mathematical fit to the chosen points. The top plot is the Io spectrum.

,p~i.man {...,___... _. _ ... _. ..

unsSU ~o~fnF SV~em. s~wnwe,~.~nen.a.ckwo.w. r~~vao,mi~ns5,noosvq •n.. 1_ T.WI1M 1 Y 33b5~D) , —~

—~ } zxm~~s ✓~ ~' iaasmn I rxerov -~ 1—•f a+zrz+s~~ ~

N9A90R IOU.3533 3133.2% 26n.6Y~6 H22.~Y) ~TE6.Sflt0 t31t.0ID9 ~i~]6R A9.9t2~2 ~~ ~w~

-- ' —__.__ l32)~9A ~ _ ___ter -'_~\ h'~ __ _
M4990 >~riOU A)? YRB.MW T;JN~ 28n 69f6 3T_2 ~Jn t]W.SBIB 131t 02~ BSa]W.+ 1999t:i2 Figure B -3 An example of synthetic Io generation from a measured spectrum.
With equations (5) and (6), equation (4) then contains only measured or computed terms. However, to compute the Planck function at the temperature of the flare

flr 

# Ng~

Page A -5M arathon F Ian: P cr( OfIDlIJI ce Tnt 

### & M tnlllon ng P ro l o co l 

### Grotmd 

### - Garyv i lle 

### R "f lll C?, tfu, 

### nar., g &.' l empcral UTl: m ust be k nown. fort urun"ly
. lh i
. can be mellSul't'd**lI llI**  fo:alU!'l:' in 

### lb " PF TJR da ta l !a" lf On e**con~mi"n** ["" lure 

### CO band nC'V 

### 2 150 1:111 ' • hg lln: 

### 84 sho w s mi. ban d a t I wo d i IT"""n !**lc m~** **tu l'l:$**  TIt e up per ph't is al ambienl tempcnll ure (300 K ) and the bon um 1'101 i s It SS O K
. TIte effec t o f llIcr"
.... i ng 

### tem perature i s to e xpand th e barul s hift lng lhe pc lllr. PO SIlI OO away 

### from band cmler
... hile increasi ng the
. tre ngth of th e w"""er lines 

### farther from band cmter . Th I s i. I**SClUill~e** fi.ln<;lion of lcm pernllln:
. '" th e -"tape of 

### the band e" 'mhally measures IcmpcralUTl: 

# CO""
.... >IlOl< '
.... . "" , .... .. 0 .= I 

# '_ I**,~** 

# ,**~~** 

# • I

. • " 

## !

1
.. 1 : 

# , -


# . - ,.**=,.. ...,"'~**  oo 1
. ;CO
.... __ ... .... . _ 

## 0-'" 

# i 1
. .,2



# .. ., 

# . . • 

# ... •

• 

# .



# - •

• 

# .



# -

. 'I:U "'8.-4
. Slr Ucl" rf 

# D r t h e . · lI nda m e n li l C O B ind II l OO K ( Iopl a n d**~50K** (bo llo m l S h n .. ln ll " I lon d o n of B i nd S h a pr ", l l h T "mp " nlll re


### The CO 

## tuw:.: an", (m cm issimt J from I lnJISnioo ofth" molc<:ulc from a higher**bnTiuni ruta** **ioo** I lal" l<l a!nwef ooc . Th"**tnn<lt i~**  are diC1llIN by quantu m """"hallie !.**HQWe ~er**  

### the l nlen,il i", o f l he individual hn"
. arc strungly inl1 u .nud b y the numbcT of mol"""l.,.. In the i ni li a! >tlll"**1~"** 10 make the II1lnsition
. This
" popu Lst ion M of the Illlu,l nate . III**di~"t:IIN** 

### by till:**aol~ mann**  d i.ln b u!lOn w hich is**lli~m** 

# "' , 20 " " 

# [- " "J N J. -N

. Q ",p t T
Hen: N 

### r i
. Ute number " f molec ule. in till: initial r ola l io nal l illIe define d 

### by the rotalional 

### quanrurn number 

## r . :-l

. i
. 

### the total number of 

### rnolecutes av aIlable
. 

### E " the 

### "neIJY of 

### Ute i niual wlIe
. k 

### Boltzmann's**C\ln~tanl** T the ubwl ule leml', :rll[un:, 8lld 

### Q a " pa 11l 1ion MIJlL R The panition sum**i~** just the sum uf the**~l'onenti ,1**  term ove r ,II J'OI"ib le energy 1c\'Cls
. Page A-(l"l ill1l lholl 

### Flare**eT form~**  fe st & MOrulonng P ro torol 

### Ground Flan: GIll)'v i1k Refi l1CfY I f llte l OS oflltl: measured i n t en sity o f lit e CO li n"" '" p lon ed a gai nst lite initI al ,tal e 

### eTICTl! y.!he: plo1 i s hne
.... lind ,lope i ' l'ro por llonal to 

### h, AT When: h IS P lanl' k ' , constant and 

### c the**pecd** .., f bgh t

_ T =pcrat ure can**Ihm:f~** be dctc !lntm:d b y mea'tl lIng lite slopc ur lite pI o\. An eJlaml'l c of litis**proce"~** t l lihow n in Figtm: II -S
. In 

### 11t" 

### u..e t he tl'Tll pen ll ln 

### wu 22S 0 C and th. group of 1 1lI ,," 10 

### !he: left in f"i gure 

### 11-4 were u ... '<i

. Thc. c a re 

### d efined as the 

### R -branch 1 in l:' of the 

### CO band
.



# • 

# . 

# "

. .. • • • • 

# - '

. ' ·llU' • • 

# <; , •• ,,
__ · 1 II" 

# 11'., . .. .. ... 0' 

# s 

# <, • • 1 

# •



# .

• •



# • E ' f igure B-S A rIO! of lltl: C O line imensuies v ('n us initial 'llIte e ne-r!O' rur determinatioo o f p" l""' pcr:ItUr
... . G iven t,,",prnlture , all tenn s in Equation 4 can he de t erm i ned equatIon (4 1**rerr~nt** th
... tn m,m,,, mll .pe<.1rum. j", t a. w"" Id be observed if lUI acti ve F TI R were u sN a nd an IR 

### beam p ropa gat ed through 

### the p lume. 

### As a result , the sa mc**algonthm** 

### used m n"nnal 

### SJI'«1l"U"<:<lp)
. can be 

### u sc '11 to 

### an alyze**th i~**  l n lllsmi ll. . ion 

### sf"'Ctnml
. A s in l1OI1tllI 1.bsotptiort s pectrosco p y. the transmission i. cJlpon rntial in /;8.$ concentr atIO n . T1uIt i'! lBn.mi •• ioo i

. given by;

PageA- 7**~br .1bon**  

### Han: P erformance T est &;**Oll ton**  Proloo;ol 

### GI'OIIIId nan: - Garyvilte Rc rllle!)' 

# '" When: K (v ) is the abwrp li,m 

### c ... ernCiml for the , poxtraJ 

### line , c lhe ga. 

### concentrat ion , and 

### I the 

### pllrh lellgtb i n 

### thc g a • . E lf« ti" d y 

### K( v) i s 

### the ref om: ncc sl .lIllalll in 

### the FT IR f Of the glU being Ql Oll i tonld
. 

### T ua ng ihe negative 

### log of 

### th is e ljuation I' ''C. what i s called All!lorban<:e

. Th a i i s; All5oro ancc(v)
- K (v) · c · I 

### (0 ' Ab ..,rtw>c:e 

### i .lincar In coocemratioa 

### limes path length llfId 

### thc absorbanc e specuwn IS lIllal yz ed using s lan da r d CllIs.icall.e"st**S'llLB~ I>-**  procedu= 1 0 gel the indi"idual gas Cotll."<:TIt l'llti Oll'i 

### i n th e spect rum . 

### To c . Htt flU le comhu.tiDII e fficimc: y, thc 

### coocmtrations of CO
. C02
. and f OI A

l ll y droc arho n 

### ( TI le) In: used 1 0 

### compule

. (('OJ) 

### E./!

. [cOJ/ +{C O}+ [T1 Ir)+{.OfJI{ I he r C. ttlU III IIg t<:nn. [ lltIIl ! ], 

### is the ctmt'"mtnl. ion or 11'I) &uol preseoL U" i l i

. PJ"e"C1i1 at lill y 

### s ignifican t cuncelltra tion
. 

### i t ", ill be Ken 

### LII the 

### I R .pectrII 

### II 1LII anenualton of rhe signal 

### with dWlCleri <lIC spoxtral. h.pn 

### drwen b y panicle li n di slrihut ltJll. I I 

### i s Dol bel ilC\'cd tha i W()1 ", ill be a 

### .i gnificant i

.. 

### uc in rnmt 

### ",<'1 1 ru n l1arn but i r il 

### is presenl**p~** 

### can be dlC'\ 

### eloped 10 

### treat u.

P age A -8

### U . \J Tl"D S7:-4 TE S 

# •

•
, ' fi R- H II O ." P £TROL EC H C O .HP d . \T



## A I' PENDI CES TO**NT** 

## n F: CR F: F:



# APPE NDIX 2.5

OUTLINE OF CONTENTS OF R EP OR TS FO R EM ISS IONS AND FLA RE COMB UST ION EFF IC IENCY TESTING

### APP E:'Ii I)JX B


### Ol 'TI.!:'if, OF C O NT F: '\lTS ()} ' "HORT S FOR**E:\lIS SIO~** **A~D** 

### FLARF: (,O:\lBl 'S 'W I'l; HflClF:J'lin ' n : SH'Ii (; I , B ack g roun d and S u m mar) 1. 1 D verv 

### ic

... 

### 1
. 2 Re sults 2. I n trod ucti on 

### 2
. 1 Ob jectiv es of T e sl l'1ognun 2 .2 

### le stmg Drganiz
.. tio n 

### 2.3 Fl are S ysh:m Compo n\'fl 1S 

### z.r.t P urpose 

### 2 .3. 2 Fl are T ip 2
. 3
. 3 Flare A utomatic Sr
... am COllln , 1 

### Syse m 2 , 4 V ldco C arne- ra. 2.5 P a'S i n' nl R ( ur , if appli ca ble
. Ac t hc FtI R) 

### 2.6 F l ar e T e st 

### Pr ugram 2
. 6. [ S t ... am De ma n d 

### 2 ,6
. 2 Test Condi li ons 2 , 6 .3 

### r m R L oc enoes ror . if a p plicab le
. A cti n' 

### FTIR l o cat i ons ) 2 ,6 .4 

### R WI L e ng t b 

### and R e pli c a l es 3
. Summ ary 

### of 3
. 1 Summary 

### Wl d K ey D ab n .:nds by F est Seri es 3 .1. 1 

### Cc mbust io n 

### E ffi e]
... ncy w ith Inc rea sing St eam R.:! l cs 

### 3
. 1
. 2 .1 S cri es A

- T y p i cailluse Lo ad Conditio n s 3 .J , 2
. 2**~I** Sc ries B

- R e fln
... ry Fu d Gas 3
. 1 .2
. 3 

### T C"'ll Series C - P rop y lc 'TIC O le , ins 

### 3 .2 Sum nll" yand 

### K o:} D ata 

### Tre nds o f \\ 'hol e nat;) 

### S cl 3 .2. 1 

### Composue o f All Hy d rocar bons 

### Tested 3 .2.2 

### visible E missions an d Combusuon Etflcien cy
3 .3 f aC IO " l n tlur n cin g T est R es ults 

### 3
. 3,1 R un L e ngt hs 

### 3.3 .2 " o"ind 

### I'I lec lS l on ly' fo r Elev ate d Fl arc! ) 3.3.2 .1 \! o l1>Cl\ lum F I u s Ra tio (o nly fm F. lc\ ated H ares I 

### 3 .3.3 P t1' IR Aiminl.l 

### (i f 

### P I ·T1 R testin g " as d o rK') 

### 3 .3 A O \ cr-.I.ll Tnt Vllriat> i lily 

### 3. 3 A, 1 Lo ng T erm Sla hilit)' 3. 3 .4.2 R
... p lica tc Anal) 'slS

I 

## unl. H.3 3.3 .4 .4 l. H.5**D1** 

### 2
. 5

Dual P FTIR S i m uJlilneous Mea surement s (i f 

### p n l R t esli ng w a s D il u ti o n Ass ump tion**"R** f ield lI ot C e ll Chec k s (i f P F TlR te stin g "'a s d one ) 3.3.5 PF1 IR C alibr ation ( ot i f ap plieabl o: . A I: Ii\ 'c m R f,; alibral i on I 3 .3.5.1**oc ~ru** **und** Rad ianc e Cali bralio ns 3 .3.5.2**lmo .ph**  Radiarn,: e and Tra n- s mi s sion C ah brali o;ln
. 3.J.5.3 

### 1 1 01 C e ll Calibra tions 3 .3. 0 P FIl R Dcl ect lm 

### (if ilpphca b le ) 3.3
. 6
. 1 S pec tral R egiun. f o r C O l 3 .-1 Cu n du.. iollJ 3 .-1. 1 Cll m pariso n \\ ith o th er , \-

Il'C I l are T eas 

### 3.5 Recommrnd at i o rui for 

### Further S l ud)' 

### p n ' l R Tes t in g Method lInIl Pr oce d ure ( i f a pplic a ble. d e scri be 

### Active 

### fT lR T eati ng 

### M

Clhotl 

### and Proc edu r e in stead u fP FT I R)**,I** D O: !'o:riP lion and Prioc ipk
. of P a ss ive 

### fT l K l' I-" 11R Si li ng C onfigur J t ion



### · U llao: k ground 4A P FTI R OJ"'.T.l tion**.5** 

### P I·TI K D ab 

### R eduction

5
. 1 

### Data S u m m ary T ab l es 

### 5.2 T e s l 

### Serie s A 5 .2. 1 

### Proc ess Conditions 5.2.2 Wind Conditions 5 .3 lest 

### Snit ' II 5 .3.1 

### P recess Co ndi ti on' 5 j,2 W ind C un d i lio n. 

### 5
. " T est S eries C 5 .-1
. 

### I**I'r~ ",**  C oOOitioos 5.-1
. 2 W ind Conditions 5,5 T est S eries 0 (Optional) 5 .5, I Proc ess Con di tiu ns 5 .5 ,2 

### W i nd C ondi ti" ns 5 .0 T cst S eri es E ( Op tiu n a l) 

### 5 ,6. 1 Process 

### C onditions 5 .6.2 W ind Co ndilio!lli



### :2 o f 3

### 5 .7 API' ENDIX 2 ,S

L ong Term Srubi 

### Iity Test 

### 5 .7 .1 Proces s 

### Conditio ns 5 .7 .2 Wind Conditions 

### 6
. Appendice s (as**n~'{;essary** modi f)' these if the testing was done using Activ e 

### rnR I A .I Calculations 

### A2 I' FIl R Theory 

### an d Opt.'l',ltion A. 3 VOC E mission s Calc ul ations A4 PCl'S<mn d I n volved with Flare Perf ormance Test A. S M i nute Data 

### o f R un s A.6 

### Vide o of'R u n s A , 7 PF nR Raw Da ta and 

### Spec tra 

### A. ll Flare Vi sual Rat ing 

### Data**Sh~'d** 

### A .9 Gas Calibrat ion 

### Sh.:c!s for Field Hot Cell Checks :.t PC s hall modify this Outline as n ec essary to re port t he res ults o f t he testi ng that evalua tes the emi ssions and C om bustion Efficiency o f the G aJ) ' v illc G round Flar es ,



### 3 00

### U" lI TE D S T..t TES .tt..t R A ' lIOS P£TROL t: ll .l1 CO . HP A ,'T



## A I" 'EN l lI CES T O C O N S EN T D ECR EE



# APPENDIX 2.6

i\ II 'C'S D ETROI T R EFI NERY

- S L U DGE H A NDLIN G SYSTEM

# App endix 2 .6 MPC's Det roit Ref inery· S ludge Handling Syste m Ex i st ing System


# - - I



# - 0-1 , " 0: ::- "

# --- 1'1""""'''
... , .... ..... .. <I 

## ft" ,_ 

# r----- .. ... """"

......**,~**



# - 0 

# - 'm I_DOCl_1 

# -- - 

# - .. - , 

## <00 ._ , .. . 1¥>oO
.......... , <

__ T
.. .. 

# .... "" ,- 

# -- UDO
. .. .... 

# -, .. 

# _ .... 

# -"-' 

# - 

# --- §
,_ t1 ..._



# .. _ ..... 

# - ,-- Mo dification s 

# .1 '- 

# . - - 

# I - - 

# -- 

# - I 

# - . 

# -- - -- w .... ... . .. ...

", 

# .. _ ,-" .m 

## I- 

# .. .. 

# _. 

# - -QOQ
.. ..... , -**::r** 

# -- _ao L. <-0
.... ,,_ . 

# ..... 

# _ . 

# - ,- _.- .. 

# -- . -
.. 

# '--
' - " '-


# - ,


# --- , • ... "'toI'

__ 

### u 

# • • { • •• • , '

...... _ _ • • • _W

... . MU

..... _ .