alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,151,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  602,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    855,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,669,285
<PP&E>                                      60,656,746
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,559,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,957,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,300,797
<BONDS>                                     20,009,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       377,239
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,270,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,957,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,530,584
<CGS>                                       26,626,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               88,121,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,165,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,838,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,322,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                   985,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,337,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,337,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
### Geology of the Charleston phosphate area, South Carolina

By: Harold E. Malde

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1079

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 137.310 Are Self-Governance Tribes required to grant a limited waiver of their sovereign immunity to assume Federal environmental responsibilities under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8]?

Yes, but only as provided in this section. Unless Self-Governance Tribes consent to the jurisdiction of a court, Self-Governance Tribes are immune from civil lawsuits. Self-Governance Tribes electing to assume Federal environmental responsibilities under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8] must provide a limited waiver of sovereign immunity solely for the purpose of enforcing a Tribal certifying officer's environmental responsibilities, as set forth in this subpart. Self-Governance Tribes are not required to waive any other immunity.
# C_2005247EN.01002901.xml

| 6.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3957 — PAI Partners/Crown Holdings GPC)

(2005/C 247/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3957. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3957. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006086EN.01001102.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) By order of that court of 19 January 2006 in Juers Pharma Import-Export GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

(Case C-40/06)

(2006/C 86/19)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finzgericht München (Germany) of 19 January 2006, received at the Court Registry on 25 January 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Jules Pharma Import-Export GmbH and Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg on the following question:

Is the Combined Nomenclature (‘the CN’) as amended by Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 (OJ 2003 L 281, p.1) of 11 September 2003 (1) amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical Nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff to be interpreted as meaning that Melatonin capsules, put up as dietary supplements in the absence of authorisation under the provisions on medical products, are to be classified under heading 3004?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 281, p.1

1

---
#### In re George W. DIAMOND v. STATE. Ex parte George W. Diamond.

SC 997.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 24, 1974.

Ian F. Gaston, Mobile, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petition of George W. Diamond for Cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Diamond v. State, 53 Ala.App. 556, 302 So.2d 243.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and HARWOOD. MADDOX and FAULKNER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris               
|Nicholas Konidaris                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:
February 10, 2011

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23








INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-23950, 33-70284, 333-03081 and 333-03083 of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated December 8, 2000 except for Note 3, as to which the
date is December 13, 2000 incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. for the year ended October 29, 2000.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio
January 24, 2001
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Begins Construction on New U.S. Embassy in Hanoi, Vietnam

# 									Department of State Begins Construction on New U.S. Embassy in Hanoi, Vietnam							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 15, 2023

As a demonstration of the enduring commitment to the United States – Vietnam relationship during the 10th anniversary of the Comprehensive Partnership, U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam Marc Knapper, Vietnam Foreign Mister Bùi Thanh Sơn,  Vice Chairman of the Hanoi People Committee Dương Đức Tuấn, alongside representatives from the U.S. Mission in Vietnam, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), and other U.S. and Vietnamese officials celebrated the groundbreaking of the new U.S. Embassy Hanoi campus on April 15 in the Cau Giay district of Hanoi.

The embassy’s design embraces the modern urban landscape and natural beauty of Hanoi and incorporates the latest in sustainable design features.  Drawing inspiration from the rice paddies that surround the region, a terraced landscape solution has been applied to mitigate rainwater, and all major structures are elevated one meter above the projected flood plain.  Sustainable materials with high recycled content, low embodied carbon, and low levels of volatile organic compounds will be used to ensure a healthy and energy-efficient interior.

Page of Washington, D.C., is the architect, and B.L. Harbert International of Birmingham, Alabama, is the construction contractor.  Nearly $350 million is anticipated to be invested in the local economy throughout the course of the project.

Since the start of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program in 1999, OBO has completed 176 new diplomatic facilities.  OBO currently has more than 50 active projects either in the design phase or under construction worldwide.

OBO provides safe, secure, functional, and resilient facilities that represent the U.S. Government to the host nation and that support U.S. diplomats in advancing U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad.

For further information, please contact OBO’s External Affairs Director Neda Brown at OBO-External-Affairs@state.gov or visit **www.state.gov/obo**.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsPartnershipsVietnam

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mammatech Corporation
(the"Company") on Form 10-KS/A for the period ended August 31,2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"),
we, Henry S. Pennypacker, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mary Bailey
Sellers, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                    Dated: December 19, 2005
    -------------------------------
    Henry S. Pennypacker
    Title: President, Chief Executive Officer

    /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
    -------------------------------
    Mary Bailey Sellers
    Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### R. C. LINDSEY, Appellant, v. William C. SHERMAN, as Property Appraiser of Okeechobee County, et al., Appellees.

No. 79-1995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 2, 1981.

R. C. Lindsey, in pro. per.

Jeffrey C. Fulford of Adams & Hill, Orlando, for appellee Sherman.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff R. C. Lindsey seeks review of an interlocutory order of the trial court striking his demand for jury trial in two consolidated cases. The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure do not authorize an interlocutory appeal from such an order. *See*Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Nor should we treat the matter as a petition for writ of certiorari because, even if the order Lindsey seeks to have reviewed constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law, such error can be rectified by plenary appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110. *See,*e. g., *Siegel v. Abramowitz,*309 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland,*311 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover,*338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); *Federal Insurance Company v. Guterma,*379 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DOWNEY, MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 171 (Friday, September 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45827-45831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21357]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-20]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM. (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-20 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, sensitivity of technology.

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 45828]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04SE09.001


[[Page 45829]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04SE09.002


[[Page 45830]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04SE09.003


[[Page 45831]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04SE09.004

[FR Doc. E9-21357 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### L. C. PARKER and Jerry Osley, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-530.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.420 Physician or treating practitioner authorization and consideration of clinical efficiency and value of items. ( a ) *Prescription for a particular brand item or mode of delivery.* ( 1 ) A physician or treating practitioner may prescribe, in writing, a particular brand of an item for which payment is made under a competitive bidding program, or a particular mode of delivery for an item, if he or she determines that the particular brand or mode of delivery would avoid an adverse medical outcome for the beneficiary.
( 2 ) When a physician or treating practitioner prescribes a particular brand or mode of delivery of an item under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the physician or treating practitioner must document the reason in the beneficiary's medical record why the particular brand or mode of delivery is medically necessary to avoid an adverse medical outcome.
( b ) *Furnishing of a prescribed particular brand item or mode of delivery.* If a physician or treating practitioner prescribes a particular brand of an item or mode of delivery, the contract supplier must— ( 1 ) Furnish the particular brand or mode of delivery as prescribed by the physician or treating practitioner;
( 2 ) Consult with the physician or treating practitioner to find an appropriate alternative brand of item or mode of delivery for the beneficiary and obtain a revised written prescription from the physician or treating practitioner; or
( 3 ) Assist the beneficiary in locating a contract supplier that can furnish the particular brand of item or mode of delivery prescribed by the physician or treating practitioner.
( c ) *Payment for a particular brand of item or mode of delivery.* Medicare does not make an additional payment to a contract supplier that furnishes a particular brand or mode of delivery for an item, as directed by a prescription written by the beneficiary's physician or treating practitioner.
( d ) *Prohibition on billing for an item different from the particular brand of item or mode of delivery prescribed.* A contract supplier is prohibited from submitting a claim to Medicare if it furnishes an item different from that specified in the written prescription received from the beneficiary's physician or treating practitioner. Payment will not be made to a contract supplier that submits a claim prohibited by this paragraph.
[72 FR 18085, Apr. 10, 2007]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Dominica’s Independence Day

# 									Dominica’s Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 3, 2021

On behalf of the government of the United States and the American people, I congratulate the people of Dominica on the 43rd anniversary of your independence.

Dominica’s cooperation with the United States on public health, security, and economic prosperity attests to our shared values and close ties.Our donation of a medical field hospital in April strengthened Dominica’s healthcare system and its flexibility to respond in times of crisis. Our entrepreneurship trainings, coding workshops, and educational exchanges helped Dominica’s youth apply creative solutions to global challenges.Through COVID-19 response and recovery assistance, vaccine donations, maritime security upgrades, and the construction of emergency operations centers, the United States worked with Dominica to end the global COVID-19 pandemic and create a safer future.

The relationship between Dominica and the United States of America offers endless opportunities.I wish all Dominicans a happy Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDominicaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,248] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on November 13, 2008, applicable to workers of Freudenberg Nonwovens, Industrial and Interlining Div., Durham, North Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 1, 2008 (73 FR 72847).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of interlining and industrial nonwoven products. 

New information shows that Pellon Corporation is the parent firm of Freudenberg Nonwovens. Workers' wages at the subject firm are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Pellon Corporation. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. 

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Freudenberg Nonwovens, Pellon Corporation, Industrial and Interlining Division who were adversely affected by increased imports of interlining and industrial nonwoven products. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,248 is hereby issued as follows: 

All workers of Freudenberg Nonwovens, Pellon Corporation, Industrial and Interlining Division, Durham, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 17, 2007 through November 13, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of January 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-2139 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P