alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006047EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 February 2006

(2006/C 47/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1896 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4200 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5602 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,82 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,360 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7850 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5053 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,285 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5724 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6062 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3715 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2302 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7949 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9323 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 149,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,2830 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5682 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3098 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 054,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,419 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,038 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,5320 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,852 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1896

JPY

Japanese yen

139,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68030

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4200

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5602

ISK

Iceland króna

78,82

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

28,360

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7850

RON

Romanian leu

3,5053

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,285

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5724

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6062

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3715

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2302

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7949

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9323

KRW

South Korean won

1 149,63

ZAR

South African rand

7,2830

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5682

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3098

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 054,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,419

PHP

Philippine peso

62,038

RUB

Russian rouble

33,5320

THB

Thai baht

46,852

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005244EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 Oktober 2005

(2005/C 244/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1933 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4628 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3086 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5537 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 73,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5731 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,597 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,918 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5522 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,852 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,62 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5653 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3903 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2571 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7261 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0243 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 245,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6409 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6562 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4235 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 290,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4984 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,78 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,185 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,12 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1933

JPY

Japanese yen

136,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4628

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3086

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5537

ISK

Iceland króna

73,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5731

CZK

Czech koruna

29,597

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,918

RON

Romanian leu

3,5522

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,852

TRY

Turkish lira

1,62

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5653

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3903

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2571

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7261

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0243

KRW

South Korean won

1 245,21

ZAR

South African rand

7,6409

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6562

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4235

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 290,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4984

PHP

Philippine peso

66,78

RUB

Russian rouble

34,185

THB

Thai baht

49,12

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005257EN.01001103.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/11

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 July 2005 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v Council and Commission

(Case T-376/04) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Council decision determining the Community's position - Decision of the EEA Joint Committee - Objection of inadmissibility - Challengeable act - Standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 257/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties:

Applicant(s): Polyelectrolyte Producers Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by K. van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by J.-P. Hix and B. Hoff-Nielsen, as Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (represented by J. Forman and M. Wilderspin, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for:

Annulment of the defendants' acts permitting the Kingdom of Norway to apply more stringent concentration limits for acrylamide than those applicable in the European Community and set out in Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 59/2004 of 6 April 2004 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement (OJ 2004 L 277, p. 30), and annulment of the Community's position relating to that decision.

Operative part of the Order:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission and the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission and the Council.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
-

3. Continuous emission monitoring system failures. _ 
· . The provisions of this subsection do not apply to sources that 

are subject to monitoring requirements in chapter 33-15-21. 

History: Amended effective October 1, 1987; January 1, 1989; June 1, 1992; 

September 1, 1997; January 1, 2007; April 1, 2009; January 1, 2013. 

General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03, 23-25-04 

Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03, 23-25-04
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 7, 2012

p0904 

# Order

September 7, 2012

145678

SC: 145678

In re K.K. ALEXANDER, Minor. COA: 306959

Oakland CC Family Division:

10

- 775263

- NA

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,924
<PP&E>                                          52,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 543,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          835,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,666
<OTHER-SE>                                   (321,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   543,624
<SALES>                                        188,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,752
<CGS>                                          257,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               965,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,040,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,040,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,040,957)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4089 — Gilde/Heiploeg) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 334 , 30/12/2005 P. 0031 - 0031 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4089 — Gilde/Heiploeg)

(2005/C 334/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. On 22 December 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertaking Gilde Buy-out Management Holding B.V. ("Gilde", the Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Heiploeg Beheer B.V. ("Heiploeg", the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Gilde: a private equity investor specialized in management buy-out investments;

- for Heiploeg: sourcing, processing, distributing and selling of shrimps.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4089 — Gilde/Heiploeg, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 412.426 Transition period. ( a ) *Duration of transition period and composition of the blended transition payment.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007, an inpatient psychiatric facility receives a payment comprised of a blend of the estimated Federal per diem payment amount, as specified in § 412.424(d) of this subpart and a facility-specific payment as specified under paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005 and before January 1, 2006, payment is based on 75 percent of the facility-specific payment and 25 percent is based on the Federal per diem payment amount.
( 2 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2006 and before January 1, 2007, payment is based on 50 percent of the facility-specific payment and 50 percent is based on the Federal per diem payment amount.
( 3 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2008, payment is based on 25 percent of the facility-specific payment and 75 percent is based on the Federal per diem payment amount.
( 4 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008, payment is based entirely on the Federal per diem payment amount.
( b ) *Calculation of the facility-specific payment.* The facility-specific payment is equal to the estimated payment for each cost reporting period in the transition period that would have been made without regard to this subpart. The facility's Medicare fiscal intermediary calculates the facility-specific payment for inpatient operating costs and capital costs in accordance with part 413 of this chapter.
( c ) *Treatment of new inpatient psychiatric facilities.* New inpatient psychiatric facilities, are facilities that under present or previous ownership or both have their first cost reporting period as an IPF beginning on or after January 1, 2005. New IPFs are paid based on 100 percent of the Federal per diem payment amount.
[69 FR 66977, Nov. 15, 2004; 70 FR 16729, Apr. 1, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 27087, May 9, 2006; 76 FR 26466, May 6, 2011]
EXHIBIT 35.1



SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity
as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Daimler
Trust, as Titling Trust, Daimler Title Co., as Collateral Agent, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as
Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), and under the 2017-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of April 1, 2017, among the
same parties (the “Servicing Supplement”) for the period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting
Period”)



I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



|(a) |  | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision.                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(b) |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.



Dated: March 25, 2019



| | /s/ Brian T. Stevens                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Name: Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title: Vice President and Controller
# C_2006010EN.01000503.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/5

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 16 September 2005

in Case C-342/04 P: Jürgen Schmoldt and Others v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Construction products - Harmonised standards and technical regulations - Thermal insulation standards)

(2006/C 10/11)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-342/04 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged on 10 August 2004 by Jürgen Schmoldt, residing in Dallgow-Döberitz (Germany), Hauptverband der Deutschen Bauindustrie e.V., established in Berlin (Germany), Kaefer Isoliertechnik GmbH & Co. KG, established in Bremen (Germany) (lawyer: H.-P. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: B. Schima assisted by A. Böhlke, lawyer) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur) and P. Kūris, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 16 September 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Schmoldt, the Hauptverband der Deutschen Bauindustrie e.V. and Kaefer Isoliertechnik GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Schmoldt, the Hauptverband der Deutschen Bauindustrie e.V. and Kaefer Isoliertechnik GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00195-CR

HARRY EUGENE 

BROWN

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Harry Eugene Brown appeals the trial court’s judgment revoking 

his deferred adjudication community supervision and sentencing him to fourteen 

years’ confinement for burglary of a habitation. Brown’s court-appointed 

appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support 

of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. 

California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 

(1967). Brown had the opportunity to file a pro se brief, but he has not done so.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 5, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           102,963
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 112,020
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        1,923
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           318,323
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             325,957
<LOANS>                                        1,037,385
<ALLOWANCE>                                       25,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,666,984
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,367,141
<SHORT-TERM>                                     117,813
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               14,703
<LONG-TERM>                                       32,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       123,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,666,984
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  104,117
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 18,221
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   5,581
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 127,919
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                45,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                53,460
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             74,459
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     18,118
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   71,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   18,766
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        12,387
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      12,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       5.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       4.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      5.30
<LOANS-NON>                                        3,988
<LOANS-PAST>                                       5,383
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  19,886
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     15,845
<RECOVERIES>                                       3,561
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 25,892
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              25,892
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        


</TABLE>