alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.144 Depreciation: Allowance for depreciation on fully depreciated or partially depreciated assets. ( a ) *Principle.* Depreciation on assets being used by a provider at the time it enters into the Medicare program is allowed. This principle applies even though such assets may be fully or partially depreciated on the provider's books.
( b ) *Application.* Depreciation is allowable on assets being used at the time the provider enters into the program. This applies even though such assets may be fully depreciated on the provider's books or fully depreciated with respect to other third-party payers. So long as an asset is being used, its useful life is considered not to have ended, and consequently the asset is subject to depreciation based upon a revised estimate of the asset's useful life as determined by the provider and approved by the contractor. Correction of prior years' depreciation to reflect revision of estimated useful life should be made in the first year of participation in the program unless the provider has used the optional method (§ 413.139), in which case the correction should be made at the time of discontinuing the use of that method. If an asset has become fully depreciated under Medicare, further depreciation is not appropriate or allowable, even though the asset may continue in use.
( c ) *Example of an allowance for a fully-depreciated asset.* For example, if a 50-year-old building is in use at the time the provider enters into the program, depreciation is allowable on the building even though it has been fully depreciated on the provider's books. Assuming that a reasonable estimate of the asset's continued life is 20 years (70 years from the date of acquisition), the provider may claim depreciation over the next 20 years—if the asset is in use that long—or a total depreciation of as much as twenty-seventieths of the asset's historical cost.
( d ) *Corrections to depreciation.* If the asset is disposed of before the expiration of its estimated useful life, the depreciation would be adjusted to the actual useful life. Likewise, a provider may not have fully depreciated other assets it is using and finds that it has incorrectly estimated the useful lives of those assets. In such cases, the provider may use the corrected useful lives in determining the amount of depreciation, provided such corrections have been approved by the contractor.
HomeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program...Denis Gennadievich Kulkov

# 									Denis Gennadievich Kulkov							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

May 3, 2023

**WANTED: DENIS GENNADIEVICH KULKOV****REWARD OF UP TO $10,000,000**

Denis Gennadievich Kulkov Reward Poster (Russian) [449 KB]TRY2CHECK Unknown Subjects Reward Poster (Russian)  [419 KB]

**NAME:** Denis Gennadievich Kulkov**ALIASES:**  Денис Геннадьевич Кульков, ”Kreenjo,” “Nordex,” “Nordexin” “Try2Check”**DOB:** April 8, 1980**POB:** Russia**NATIONALITY:**Russia**CITIZENSHIP:**Russia**HEIGHT:** 5’7”**WEIGHT:** 170 lbs**HAIR COLOR:** Black**EYE COLOR:**Brown

Denis Kulkov is the owner and operator of Try2Check, a credit card-checking web platform which is a primary tool of the illicit credit card trade.Cybercriminals who acquire large batches of stolen credit cards run the cards through Try2Check to determine which stolen credit card numbers remained active.These cybercriminals then use the resulting data to sell other fraudsters the stolen cards that retained their value.Try2Check victimizes not only credit card issuers and holders, but also a major U.S.-based payment processing company whose systems Try2Check misused to perform the card checks.

Try2Check ran tens of millions of credit card checks per year.Over a nine-month period in 2018, the site performed at least 16 million checks, and over a 13-month period beginning in September 2021, the site performed at least 17 million checks.Through the illegal operation of his websites, the defendant made at least $18 million in Bitcoin (and an unknown amount through other payment systems).

On April 18, 2023, based on a federal indictment, a warrant for the arrest of Denis Kulkov was issued in the Eastern District of New York, charging him with access device fraud, computer intrusion, and money laundering. 

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $10,000,000** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Denis Kulkov.In addition, the Department is also offering a **SEPARATE REWARD OF UP TO $1,000,000** for information leading to the identification of other key leaders of the Try2Check platform.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Secret Service via email at MostWanted@usss.dhs.gov.If you are located outside of the United States, you can visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.If you are in the United States, you can contact the local U.S. Secret Service office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCrimeCyber SecurityRussia

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended July 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such report on Form 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                              119,830
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,228,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                        432,044
<INVENTORY>                                         801,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,979,332
<PP&E>                                            3,571,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,577,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   17,210,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,181,786
<BONDS>                                           6,397,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                256
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,630,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     17,210,675
<SALES>                                           8,545,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,545,115
<CGS>                                             3,389,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,537,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    268,468
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  605,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,206,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (422,299)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (784,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (784,117)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)


</TABLE>
# C_2006086EN.01001501.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/15

---

Action brought on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-65/06)

(2006/C 86/27)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ramón Vidal Puig and Wouter Wils, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by not laying down sanctions for infringements of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(3) of that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by not laying down sanctions for infringements of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(3) of that regulation;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 16(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 provides: ‘The sanctions laid down by Member States for infringements of this Regulation shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive’. Article 19 provides that Regulation No 261/2004 was to enter into force on 17 February 2005. According to the information before the Commission, Belgium has not as yet laid down any sanctions for infringements of the Regulation which are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Kosovan Public Official Nexhat Krasniqi for Significant Corruption

# 									Designation of Kosovan Public Official Nexhat Krasniqi for Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

November 3, 2023

The United States is designating Nexhat Krasniqi, the former Director of the Department of Procurement at the Kosovo Ministry of Trade and Industry, as generally ineligible for entry into the United States, due to his involvement in significant corruption. As a public official responsible for oversight of procurement contracts, Krasniqi abused his public position by accepting bribes in exchange for awarding a contract permitting the construction of an industrial park in the Drenas municipality by the operating company Eltoni.

Today’s action demonstrates the United States stands with those in Kosovo who seek accountability of corrupt public officials. This designation reaffirms the U.S. commitment to counter corruption, which harms the public interest, hampers countries’ economic prosperity, and curtails the ability of governments to respond effectively to the needs of their people.

*These public designations are made under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2023, as carried forward by the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2024 (Div. A, P.L. 118-15). The Department is also designating Krasniqi’s children, Aulona Krasniqi and Olti Krasniqi, as generally ineligible for entry into the United States.*

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCorruptionKosovoOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07815

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07815\07815_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07815\07815_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07815\07815_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07815\07815_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07815\07815_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07815\07815_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07815\07815_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07815\07815_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07815\Supplemental Documents\Question A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07815\Supplemental Documents\QUESTION_A5_2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07815\Certification Statement_07815.pdf Plant Certification Statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.6 Services furnished by a Federal provider of services or other Federal agency. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare does not pay for services furnished by a Federal provider of services or other Federal agency.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Payment may be made— ( 1 ) For emergency hospital services, if the conditions of § 424.103 of this chapter are met;
( 2 ) For services furnished by a participating Federal provider which CMS has determined is providing services to the public generally as a community institution or agency;
( 3 ) For services furnished by participating hospitals and SNFs of the Indian Health Service; and
( 4 ) For services furnished under arrangements (as defined in § 409.3 of this chapter) made by a participating hospital.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
 PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements of PAB Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-74819, 333-89527, 333-107039 and 333-137316) and Form S-3D (33-74080) of our reports, dated March 8, 2010 of our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PAB Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC
 
 Albany, Georgia
 March 8, 2010
No. 00-5889.

#### Kreisel *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                   |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Eric Yu                                                       |   |   |        |   |
| Name: Eric      Yu                                                |   |   |        |   |
| Title: Chief      Financial Officer Chief      Accounting Officer |   |   |        |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: April      15, 2009                                         |   |   |   |   |

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Portuguese Political Director Vinhas

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Portuguese Political Director Vinhas							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 24, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman spoke today with Portuguese MFA Political Director Rui Vinhas. Deputy Secretary Sherman and Ambassador Vinhas condemned Russia’s premeditated, unprovoked, and unjustified attack against Ukraine in violation of international law. They underscored their commitment to imposing, together with like-minded partners, swift, coordinated, and severe costs for Russia’s actions. Deputy Secretary Sherman and Ambassador Vinhas agreed on the urgent need for all members of the international community to condemn this attack in the strongest possible terms, to stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine, and raise their voices against this blatant rejection of the fundamental principles of international peace and security.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonPortugalRussiaUkraine

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0030. RAQUEL ETTRICK v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.

Raquel Ettrick hasfiled an Emergency Motion requesting an extension of time

to file. Asset forth in the motion, Ettrick received an adverse ruling from the Superior

Court of DeKalb County on December 18, 2017. Ettrick asserts a desire to seek a

discretionary appeal from that order. Ettrick’s attorney represents to this court that a

physical move of her professional office has interfered with her capacity for

productive work and, accordingly, that an extension isrequired to allow her to file the

application. Ettrick’s motion involvesthe intersection of three of our Rules. Ettrick’s

motion referenced none of these rules nor did it reference any authority in support of

the motion.

This court’s Rule 16 establishes the framework for extensions of time to file.

UnderRule 16(c), Ettrick’s Motion is properlycharacterized as an EmergencyMotion

under Rule 40(b).

This court’s Rule 31 governing applicationsfor discretionary appeals, requires

applicationsfor discretionary appeal to be due within 30 days of the trial court’s order

(on or before January 17, 2018 in the present matter). Further, Rule 31(i) precludes

an Emergency Motion for extension of time to file which is filed after the application

due date. Ettrick’s Emergency Motion was filed on January 11, 2018.

Rule 40(b) govern’s Emergency Motions before this court. Rule 40(b) directs

that this power “shall be exercised sparingly”. Certainly, the move of a professional

office can significantly impact productivity. Even so, the trial court and other parties

have an interest in expeditious certainty throughout the process. Moreover, the

requirements of an application for discretionary appeal are well within the scope of

January 12, 2018
ordinary practice. Ettrick will be granted an extension of time to file, but to a date

specific and not for the entire 10 days requested. This extension should allow

Ettrick’s counselsufficient time to file while also respecting the spirit of the time line

established by law.

Ettrick’s EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION is GRANTED.

Ettrick’s application for discretionary appeal must be filed and is DUE ON OR

BEFORE JANUARY 26, 2018.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/12/2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-K), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 14, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce     
|Alan M. Pearce         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
#### Leo HENZEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 46467.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 15, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeBureau of Energy ResourcesRemarks & Releases...Clean EDGE Asia Launches the Country Spotlight Series with Malaysia

# 									Clean EDGE Asia Launches the Country Spotlight Series with Malaysia							

Other Release

May 12, 2023

On Friday 12 May 2023, Clean EDGE Asia launched the inaugural event in Country Spotlight Series by featuring Malaysia. U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Energy Resources Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lochman, along with Malaysian Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment and Climate Change Undersecretary Mahpudz, presided over the event. The Malaysia Spotlight focused on how the United States and Malaysia could work together to achieve Malaysia’s clean energy transition goals.

Clean EDGE Asia’s Country Spotlight Series routinely highlights a different country in the Indo-Pacific. This Series brings together the highlighted country’s government and NGOs, whole of U.S. government, private sector, and international financial institutions to wed tactical level clean energy development problems faced by the invited country to near-term actionable solutions.

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyMalaysia

Back to Top
40896.

#### SAVANNAH & ATLANTA RAILROAD COMPANY v. WARD.

Decided October 6, 1964

Rehearing denied October 23, 1964.

*Hitch, Miller, Beckmann & Simpson, B. M. Hitch, George W. Fryhofer,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. Cliff Hatcher,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him when the truck he was driving was struck by a train at a public crossing. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the trial court denied the defendant’s motion for new trial which contained the general grounds only. The exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

The evidence in this case disclosed that the defendant railroad was guilty of negligence per se in that its engineer failed to begin to blow the locomotive’s whistle upon reaching the 400 yard blowpost as required by *Code Ann.*§ 94-506 *(Bugg v. Cook,*32 Ga. App. 116, 118, 122 SE 714); and under the record here it was for the jury to determine whether the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, or whether such injuries were caused by the plaintiff’s failure to exercise ordinary care for his own safety in operating his vehicle in violation of certain statutes regulating the operation of motor vehicles upon the public highways. *Louisville &c. R. Co. v. Stafford,*146 Ga. 206, 209 (91 SE 29); *Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Larsen,*19 Ga. App. 413 (91 SE 517). The trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*