T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ALEJ AN DRO M I GU EL HERNAN DEZF L O R E S , A K A M i gu el F l ores -H ernand ez , A K A A l ej andro H ernand ez , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10504 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 6 7 3 - F R Z - J J M1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona F r a nk R . Z apa t a , S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r27, 2011 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: F A R R IS , B E E Z E R , an d L E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l ej andro H ernand ez -F l ores appeal s hi s c on vi ct i on of i l l egal re entryaf t er de port a t i on i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. H e rna nde z - F l or e s a r gue s tha tthe



# FI LED JAN 26 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSdi stri ctcourterre d b y a dm i tt i ng st at em ent s he m ade t o a bo rderpatrol agentthat

w er e t aken i n v i ol at i on of Mi r anda v . A r i z ona , 3 8 4 U . S . 4 3 6 (1 9 6 6 ). B ecau se H ernand ez -F l ores di d n otm ov e t o sup pres s the st at em ent s i n the di stri ctcourtas re qu i re d b y Rul e 12(b)(3) of the F eder al R ul es of C ri m i nal P roce du re , w e hol d that H e rn a n d e z - F lo r e s w a iv e d th is a r g u m e n t a n d th e r e f o r e a f f irm th e ju d g m e n t. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on ove rthi s c a s e unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. T he f a c t s of the ca se ar e kno w n t o the part i es . W e do n otre peatthem here . R u le 1 2 o f

th e F e d e r a l R u le s o f

C r im in a l P r o c e d u r e r e q u ir e s am o tio n to s u p p r e s s e v id e n c e to b e r a is e d b e f o r e tr ia l. F ED . R. C RIM . P . 1 2 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( C ) . A p a rty ’s f a ilu r e to d o s o is tr e a te d a s aw a iv e ro f th e is s u e . I

d. at12 (e ). T he w ai ver is ab s o lu te : th is c o u rt c a n n o t e v e n r e v ie w th e is s u e f o rp la in e rr o r . U

ni ted Stat es v. Mu r illo , 288 F . 3d 1126, 1135 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . A c ourtm a ygr a ntr e l i e f f r om the w a iv e rif th e p a rty c a n s h o w g o o d c au s e a s to w h y th e m o tio n w a s n o t tim e ly m a d e . F ED . R. C RIM . P . 1 2 ( e ) . H e r e , H e rna nde z - F l or e s di d notm ove i n the di s tr i c tc ourtt o s uppr e s s the s t a t e m e nt s he m a de t o the bor de rpa tr ol a ge nta nd ha s notpr ovi de d a ny e xpl a na t i on for hi s f ai l ure t o d o so. H i s bri ef ar gu es the m er i t s of the i ss ue on l y. W e hol d that H e rn a n d e z - F lo r e s h a s w a iv e d th is is s u e . H e rn a n d e z - F lo r e s ’s c o n v ic tio n is there fore A FFI R M ED .