alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Progress report**
 
2004 | 2005-06| 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2013 | 2014| 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:A 114.1/55:
Item Number:0034-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000980377
 
February 14, 2018
§ 402.9 Failure to request a hearing. ( a ) If the respondent does not request a hearing within 60 days of receipt of the notice of proposed determination specified in § 402.7, any civil money penalty, assessment, or exclusion becomes final and CMS or OIG may impose the proposed penalty, assessment, or exclusion, or any less severe penalty, assessment, or suspension.
( b ) CMS or OIG notifies the respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any penalty, assessment, or exclusion that has been imposed and of the means by which the respondent may satisfy the judgment.
( c ) The respondent has no right to appeal a penalty, assessment, or exclusion for which he or she has not requested a hearing.
# C_2006010EN.01002801.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/28

---

Action brought on 7 November 2005 — Tesoka v European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

(Case T-398/05)

(2006/C 10/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sabrina Tesoka (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: J.-L. Fagnart, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the explicit decision of rejection of 14 October 2005 |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the explicit decision of rejection of 14 October 2005

| — | Rule that the applicant may receive all the allowances and benefits which she can claim by reason of her resignation of 2 August 2005 pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 17(2) of Regulation No 1860/76 amended by Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1111/2005 of 24 June 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the applicant may receive all the allowances and benefits which she can claim by reason of her resignation of 2 August 2005 pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 17(2) of Regulation No 1860/76 amended by Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1111/2005 of 24 June 2005;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant fair compensation of EUR 35 000, together with interest for late payment at the rate of 7 % from 2 August 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant fair compensation of EUR 35 000, together with interest for late payment at the rate of 7 % from 2 August 2005;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a member of the defendant's staff since 2001, resigned on 2 August 2005 in order to receive the pecuniary benefits set out under Regulation No 1111/2005 for staff members who had resigned before 4 August 2005. In her action, the applicant argues that the defendant rejected her application for indemnities to which she was entitled, and for the documents which she needed to receive social protection in her country of residence, and claims annulment of that decision of refusal and compensation for the damage allegedly suffered.

In support of her action, she alleges infringement of the second subparagraph of Article 17(2) of Regulation No 1860/76 as amended by Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1111/2005, infringement of Article 28a of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities, of the provisions of Commission Regulation 91/88 of 13 January 1988, and of her legitimate expectations.

---
#### William A. WEINISCHKE and Kathryn Gray Weinischke v. REBEL REALTY CO.

No. 52360.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lafayette County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

*1327Mary Ann Connell, Holcomb, Dunbar, Connell, Merkel, Tollison & Khayat, Oxford, for appellants.

Russell Blair, T. H. Freeland, III, Free-land & Gafford, Oxford, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterlyperiod ended November 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Konidaris, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Nicholas Konidaris                           |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Nicholas Konidaris                               |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and  Director |
| December 22, 2004                                |

 

----
# C_2005229EN.01003101.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/31

---

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Matthias Ghem against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-270/05)

(2005/C 229/66)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Matthias Ghem, resident in Woluwé-Saint-Pierre (Belgium), represented Lucas Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 24 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 24 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Fernandez Tunon

Commission

---
§ 136a.41 Definitions. For purposes of making appointments to vacancies in all positions in the Indian Health Service a preference will be extended to persons of Indian descent who are: ( a ) Members of any recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction;
( b ) Descendants of such members who were, on June 1, 1934, residing within the present boundaries of any Indian reservation;
( c ) All others of one-half or more Indian blood of tribes indigenous to the United States;
( d ) Eskimos and other aboriginal people of Alaska; or
( e ) Until January 4, 1990 or until the Osage Tribe has formally organized, whichever comes first, a person of at least one-quarter degree Indian ancestry of the Osage Tribe of Indians, whose rolls were closed by an act of Congress.
[43 FR 29783, July 11, 1978, as amended at 54 FR 48246, Nov. 22, 1989]
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(03)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(03)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES WITH THE 

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
§ 405.2400 Basis. Subpart X is based on the provisions of the following sections of the Act: ( a ) Section 1833—Amounts of payment for supplementary medical insurance services.
( b ) Section 1861(aa)—Rural health clinic services and Federally qualified health center services covered by the Medicare program.
( c ) Section 1834(o)—Federally qualified health center prospective payment system beginning October 1, 2014.
( d ) Section 1834(y)—Payment for certain services furnished by rural health clinics.
[79 FR 25473, May 2, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 82176, Nov. 22, 2023]
# Benin

68 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group Meeting	  November 15, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Cotonou, Benin: QSI International School of Benin 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Benin National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 1, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Benin	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Benin	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Benin	  May 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Narrowing the Gender Digital Divide: Empowering Girls Around the Globe to Build Digital Skills for a Lifetime 	  April 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint 10-Year Plans for the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  March 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Pursuing Peace Through Partnerships, Local Engagement, and Learning	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2023 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
#### § 589.215 Prohibited facilitation.

Except as otherwise authorized, U.S. persons, wherever located, are prohibited from approving, financing, facilitating, or guaranteeing a transaction by a foreign person where the transaction by that foreign person would be prohibited by § 589.206, § 589.207, or § 589.208 of this part if performed by a U.S. person or within the United States.
Listen

# Annual Statutory Enforcement Reports

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-   Next  
-   Last  

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating ISIS Supporters

# 									Designating ISIS Supporters							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 30, 2024

The United States is today designating two individuals who have helped create, manage, and support an ISIS affiliated platform that provides ISIS leadership and supporters with technical cybersecurity training, enabled ISIS’s use of virtual currency, and supported the terrorist group’s recruitment. We are also designating one financial facilitator involved in transferring funds to ISIS-affiliated individuals in Syria.

Today’s actions reinforce the United States’ commitment to the mission of the Counter ISIS Finance Group (CIFG), a working group of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS comprising over 80 countries and international organizations. These actions also coincide with the 19th meeting of the CIFG to discuss the disruption of ISIS financing networks around the world.

Our actions today target the terrorist group’s facilitation activities online—including the group’s use of virtual currency, recruitment, and promotion of its terrorist ideology—as well as ISIS’s transfers of funds to its supporters.  Together with our international partners, the United States is committed to countering ISIS and those who provide logistical, technical, or financial support to terrorist groups.

*The Department of the Treasury action was taken pursuant to**Executive Order 13224**, as amended.  For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsTerrorismThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

Back to Top
Order entered August 17, 2018 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00879-CV 

No. 05-18-00880-CV 

IN RE JOSE WILLIAM PATINO, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the County Criminal Court No. 6 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. MC17A8234 and MC17A8235 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

 JUSTICE
# C_2006060EN.01005101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/51

---

Action brought on 24 January 2006 — Universal v Commission

(Case T-34/06)

(2006/C 60/94)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Universal Corp. (Richmond, USA) [represented by: A. Riesenkampff, T. Reher, M. Holzhäuser, C. Swaak, M. Mollica, avocats]

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final, of 20 October 2005, relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) EC (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw Tobacco Italy) insofar as it is addressed to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final, of 20 October 2005, relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) EC (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw Tobacco Italy) insofar as it is addressed to the applicant;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested Decision the Commission found that several companies, including the applicant and one of its indirect subsidiaries, infringed Article 81(1) EC by way of agreements and/or concerted practices in the Italian raw tobacco sector. On this basis, it imposed a fine on the applicant, jointly and severally with its subsidiary.

In support of its application the applicant contends, firstly, that in the contested Decision the Commission adopted, without giving any explanation or objective justification, a diametrically opposed position to its own position in the Spanish raw tobacco case which involved the same parent/subsidiary relationship, the same time frame, the same commodity, the same buying prices and the same lack of involvement or knowledge by the applicant. On this basis the applicant considers that the Commission violated its obligation to state reasons, disregarded the principle of equal treatment and violated the applicant's legitimate expectations by imposing a fine on it for the infringement of its subsidiary.

The applicant further argues that the Commission failed to prove to the requisite legal standard any decisive influence by the applicant on the commercial behaviour of its subsidiary. In this context, it submits that the Commission wrongly considered that requirements for reporting and for certain approvals confirm its exercise of decisive commercial influence over its subsidiary whereas this was not the case, due to the applicant's very decentralised structure and organisation.

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Iran Petroleum and Petrochemical Sanctions Evaders

# 									Designating Iran Petroleum and Petrochemical Sanctions Evaders							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 29, 2022

The United States is taking further action to disrupt efforts to evade sanctions on the sale of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products.  Specifically, the Department of State is imposing sanctions on two People’s Republic of China (PRC)-based entities: Zhonggu Storage and Transportation Co. Ltd., which operates a commercial crude oil storage facility for Iranian petroleum that provides a vital conduit for the Iranian petroleum trade, as well as WS Shipping Co. Ltd., the ship manager for a vessel that has transported Iranian petroleum products.  The Department of the Treasury is also designating eight entities for their involvement in Iran’s petrochemical trade.  These entities are based in Hong Kong, Iran, India, and the United Arab Emirates.

These designations are made pursuant to Executive Order 13846, which authorizes the imposition of sanctions with respect to trade in Iranian petroleum, petroleum products, and petrochemical products.

As Iran continues to accelerate its nuclear program in violation of the JCPOA, we will continue to accelerate our enforcement of sanctions on Iran’s petroleum and petrochemical sales under authorities that would be removed under the JCPOA.  These enforcement actions will continue on a regular basis, with an aim to severely restrict Iran’s oil and petrochemical exports.  Anyone involved in facilitating these illegal sales and transactions should cease and desist immediately if they wish to avoid U.S. sanctions.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Joanne WARREN and A. G. Warren, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of Aaron Warren, Keith Warren, Xavier Warren and Bruce Warren, Minors v. The CITY OF GULFPORT.

No. 51571.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 23, 1980.

Rushing & Guice, Robert A. Willemoes, Biloxi, for appellants.

Graves, Riley, Meadows & Walker, Robert H. Walker, Gulfport, for appellee.

SUGG, Justice, for the Court:

The sole question in this case is whether this Court should abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

The Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Harrison County sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ declaration *1099holding that the City was not liable under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We affirm and decline to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity for the reasons stated in *Jones v. Knight,*373 So.2d 254 (Miss.1979) and numerous other cases on this question.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE, and COFER, JJ., concur.

PATTERSON, C. J., and BOWLING, J., dissent.

PATTERSON, Chief Justice,

dissenting:

I dissent from the majority for the reasons stated by Justice Bowling in his dissent in *Jones v. Knight,*373 So.2d 254 (Miss.1979).

BOWLING, J., joins in this dissent.
# C_2006086EN.01001303.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/13

---

Action brought on 3 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-61/06)

(2006/C 86/24)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 3 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima and D. Recchia, acting as Agents.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that by failing to submit its national annual report on the promotion of biofuels before 1 July 2004, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Directive 2003/30/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that by failing to submit its national annual report on the promotion of biofuels before 1 July 2004, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Directive 2003/30/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport;

1

| 2. | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The report referred to in Article 4(1) of the directive should have been sent to the Commission before 1 July 2004. To date, the Commission has not received any information from the Italian authorities.

The Commission therefore maintains that as matters now stand Italy has not communicated the report on the promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport required under Article 4(1) of the directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 123, p. 42.

1

---
README Document

This CD contains the intstallation file for EPA's Optimization model for reducing Emissions of Greenhouse gases from Automobiles (OMEGA), and the input and output files used to support EPA’s Greenhouse Gas emission control program fo r cars and light trucks. EPA has established a webpage for OMEGA on the EPA agency website, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/models.htm. T his webpage will provide additional information about the OMEGA model, including both the model for downloading and u se and model documentation.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Six Individuals for their Support to Boko Haram

# 									Designation of Six Individuals for their Support to Boko Haram							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

March 25, 2022

The United States is designating six individuals for their support of the terrorist group Boko Haram.  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has added Nigerian nationals Abdurrahman Ado Musa, Salihu Yusuf Adamu, Bashir Ali Yusuf, Muhammed Ibrahim Isa, Ibrahim Ali Alhassan, and Surajo Abubakar Muhammad to the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended, for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, Boko Haram.

Today’s action follows the United Arab Emirates’ prosecutions, convictions, and designations of these individuals for supporting terrorism.  The Department of State designated Boko Haram as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist organization on November 14, 2013.  The Nigeria-based group is responsible for numerous attacks in the northern and northeastern regions of the country as well as in the Lake Chad Basin in Cameroon, Chad, and Niger that have killed thousands of people since 2009.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of CounterterrorismNigeriaOffice of the SpokespersonTerrorist Designation

Back to Top