alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# RECEIVED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## AUG 2 020f2

In The Matter Of: HELOAIR, INC., Respondent. OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D.C. ) ) ) ) ) 

## HEARING DOCKET

DocketNo. FAA-2012-0472 Case No. 2011-EA-210081

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO AGENCY'S MOTION FOR 10-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWERTO MOTION TO DISMISS COMES NOWRespondent, HeloAir, Inc., by counsel, and for its response to Agent's Motion for 10-DayExtension ofTime to File Answerto Motionto Dismiss, states as follows: Respondent, by counsel, does not object to the extension to September 4, 2012 for the FAAto file a response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss.

Dated: August 14,2012

{W2050228_l 009816-084619 }(W2050228.l 009816-084619} Respectfully submitted, SANDS ANDERSON

### PC

John G. Butler, III, Esquire SB # 46200) (DCB # 460969) 

### Counsel for Respondent SANDS ANDERSON

### PC Bank ofAmerica Center 1111 EastMain Street, Suite 2400 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 648-1636 Facsimile: (804) 783-7291CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this date sent first class mail, a copy ofthe foregoing Response to Agency's Motion for 10-Day Extension ofTime to File Answer to Motion to Dismiss, addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 And further, that I have this date sent via first class mail, a copy ofthe foregoing Response to Agency's Motion for 10-DayExtension ofTime to File Answer to Motion to Dismiss, addressed to: Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 EasternRegion Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jarnaica,NewYork 11434 Telephone: 718-553-3258 Facsimile: 718-995-5699 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Telephone: 202-366-2132 Facsimile: 202-366-7536 Whit Baldwin, President HeloAir, Inc., Respondent 5721 Gulfstrearn Road Richmond, Virginia 23250 Telephone: 804-226-3400 Facsimile: 804-226-3494

Dated: August 14,2012

{W2050228.l 009816-084619 ){W2050228.I 009816-084619) Jo G. Butler III, Esquire
HomeTrinidad and Tobago

# Trinidad and Tobago

83 items

        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Trinidad and Tobago Summary	   
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Trinidad and Tobago	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Trinidad and Tobago	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Trinidad and Tobago	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Trinidad and Tobago	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Trinidad and Tobago	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Trinidad and Tobago (20-101) – Extension of Status of Forces Agreement	  January 1, 2020 
        -    Report  		Trinidad and Tobago	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Trinidad and Tobago	  June 21, 2019 

previous page1…456789next page

Back to Top
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

[MMAA 104000]

Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale (NOS) for 
Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Area (CPA) Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 235 (CPA Sale 235)

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the proposed notice of CPA Sale 235.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEM announces the availability of the Proposed NOS for 
proposed CPA Sale 235. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 
556.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil 
and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to 
section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides affected States the 
opportunity to review the Proposed NOS. The Proposed NOS sets forth the 
proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, 
royalty rates, and rental rates.

DATES: Affected States may comment on the size, timing, and location of 
proposed CPA Sale 235 within 60 days following their receipt of the 
Proposed NOS. The Final NOS will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening 
currently is scheduled for March 18, 2015.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed NOS for CPA Sale 235 and a 
Proposed NOS Package containing information essential to potential 
bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, Gulf of 
Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-
2519. The Proposed NOS and Proposed NOS Package also are available on 
BOEM's Web site at http://www.boem.gov/Sale-235/.
    Agency Contact: Robert Samuels, Chief, Leasing Division, 
Robert.Samuels@boem.gov.

    Dated: October 14, 2014.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-24729 Filed 10-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3138

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the time

limitation on benefits for immunosuppressive drugs under the Medicare

program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1996

Mr. CANADY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee

on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the time limitation on benefits for immunosuppressive

drugs under the Medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMITATION ON MEDI4 CARE BENEFITS FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE

5 DRUGS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2)(J) of the So7 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(J)) is amended
2

•HR 3138 IH

1 by striking ‘‘, but only’’ and all that follows up to the semi2 colon at the end.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs furnished on or after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 99-471.

#### Sandage et ux. *v.*Bankhead Enterprises, Inc., dba Bankhead Transportation Equipment Co.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 417.408 Contract application process. ( a ) *Contents of application.* ( 1 ) The application for a contract must include supporting information in the form and detail required by CMS.
( 2 ) Whenever feasible, CMS exempts the HMO or CMP from resubmittal of information it has already submitted to CMS in connection with a determination made under the provisions of § 417.406.
( b ) *Approval of application.* ( 1 ) If CMS approves the application, it gives written notice to the HMO or CMP, indicating that it meets the requirements for either a risk or reasonable cost contract or only for a reasonable cost contract.
( 2 ) If the HMO or CMP is dissatisfied with a determination that it meets the requirements only for a reasonable cost contract, it may request reconsideration in accordance with the procedures specified in subpart R of this part.
( c ) *Denial of application.* If CMS denies the application, it gives written notice to the HMO or CMP indicating— ( 1 ) That it does not meet the contract requirements under section 1876 of the Act;
( 2 ) The reasons why the HMO or CMP does not meet the contract requirements; and
( 3 ) The HMO's or CMP's right to request reconsideration in accordance with the procedures specified in subpart R of this part.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 8853, Mar. 1, 1991; 58 FR 38078, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45676, Sept. 1, 1995]
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-13-0000058 

06-OCT-2014 

08:41 AM 

SCWC-13-0000058
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

SHIRLEY PISO PICO,


Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN,

nka HAWAI'I PACIFIC HEALTH,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-13-0000058; CASE NO. AB2012-347)
 

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

On September 26, 2014, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant
 

Shirley Piso Pico filed a “Motion for Reconsideration and
 

Declaration” of the September 17, 2014 order rejecting her
 

application for writ of certiorari. The rejection of an
 

application for writ of certiorari is not subject to a motion for
 

reconsideration in the supreme court. See HRAP 40.1(h) (“Neither
 

acceptance nor rejection of an application for writ of certiorari
 

shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme
 
court.”). Moreover, there is no basis for clarification of the 

September 17, 2014 order. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is 

dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 6, 2014. 

Shirley Piso Pico

pro se
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 21, 2009, Chemic Laboratories, Inc., 480 Neponset Street, Building 7, Canton, Massachusetts 02021, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of Cocaine (9041), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the above listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers for the purpose of research.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

                    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control,                     **Federal Register**                     Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than November 9, 2009.                

Dated: August 28, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-21521 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Aircraft Management Services, Inc. 

Complainant 

v. 

Santa Rosa County, Florida 

(sponsoring Peter Prince Field) 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-02 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to March 24, 2015. 

An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in 

this case. 

ndall S. Fiertz 

Director of Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

8HcG to i ~DIS Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on \G , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the FAA's Request for 

Additional Information and Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: 

For Complainant 

Ryan P. Hatler 

Michael J. Schofield 

Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse 

125 West Romana Street, Suite 800 

P.O. Box 13010 

Pensacola, FL 32591-3010 

For Respondent 

Angela J. Jones 

Santa Rosa County's Attorney's Office 

6495 Caroline Street 

Milton, FL 32570 

Gregory T. Stewart 

Harry F. Chiles 

William Garner 

Nobors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 

1500 Mahan Drive, Suite 200 

Tallahassee, FL 32308 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

( / 

J I IL 

_l~/ /_i-"--·· tft"'---·/~-_. ~1(.£----/-/~&:b. Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
# C_2005315EN.01001402.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/14

---

Action brought on 26 September 2005 — Saint-Gobain Pam SA v OHIM

(Case T-364/05)

(2005/C 315/27)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Saint-Gobain Pam SA (Nancy, France) (represented by: J. Blanchard, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Propamsa SA

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision given on 15 April 2005 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision given on 15 April 2005 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Saint-Gobain Pam SA

Applicant for a Community trade mark

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘PAM PLUVIAL’ for goods in Class 6 (‘pipes and tubes of metal or based on metal, pipes and tubes of cast iron, fittings of metal for the aforesaid goods’) and Class 17 (‘fittings, not of metal, for rigid pipes and tubes, not of metal’).

Community trade mark concerned

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Propamsa SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish trade mark registration No 737 992 of the semi-figurative mark ‘PAM PAM’, for goods in Class 19 (‘construction materials’), Spanish trade mark registration No 120 075 of the word mark ‘PAM’ for goods in Class 19 (‘cements’) and International trade mark registration No 463 089 ‘PAM’ for goods in Class 1 (‘adhesive substances destined for industry’) and Class 19 (‘materials for construction (non-metallic), wrought or unwrought’).

Mark or sign cited in opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division: upheld the opposition and rejected the application for registration.

Decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissed the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law

Infringement of the principle of continuity in terms of their functions between the various departments of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market in that a decision that a party appearing before the authorities ruling at first instance which has failed to provide evidence as to matters of fact or law within the prescribed time-limits cannot, pursuant to Article 74(2) of Council Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, rely on such evidence before the Board of Appeal is contrary to that principle.

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of that Regulation.

---
# C_2005171EN.01000302.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 12 May 2005

in Case C-42/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven in Maatschap J. B. en R. A. M. Elshof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (1)

1

(Foot and mouth disease - Regulation (EC) No 1046/2001 - Grant of aid for the delivery of animals destined for rendering - Upper limit of aid determined on the basis of the average weight of animals per batch)

(2005/C 171/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-42/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands), made by decision of 23 January 2004, received at the Court on 3 February 2004, in the proceedings between Maatschap J. B. en R. A. M. Elshof and Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and E. Levits, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

The term 'batch' within the meaning of Article 4(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1046/2001 of 30 May 2001 adopting exceptional support measures for the markets in pigmeat and veal in the Netherlands refers to all calves which are delivered for rendering by a producer on one day in connection with one sales transaction.

---

(1)  OJ C 85 of 03.04.2004.

1

---
#### James Duncan WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-571.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Vivian E. CHAMPAGNE et al.

No. 65001.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 18, 1979.

In re State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terrebonne. 371 So.2d 626.

Denied.

SUMMERS, C. J., would grant the writ.
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #7, Feb 20 – 26, 2008

A weak winter storm moved through Afghanistan and Pakistan during

the last week, bringing light rain and snow to the region. Precipitation

totals were generally below 10 mm (liquid equivalent), although some

areas received as much as 75 mm of precipitation, mainly in the west

and north of the country. Precipitation deficits across northern

Afghanistan have been reduced or eliminated since December.

However, some provinces in northeast and central Afghanistan

continue to contend with below‐normal precipitation totals for this

time of year.  

A low pressure system is expected to track just north of Afghanistan,

moving roughly along the Pakistan‐Afghanistan border. This will likely

bring snow and rain to the areas that have been improving the most,

and miss the areas in the eastern and central Afghanistan that

continue to face precipitation deficits.  

Temperatures have warmed in Afghanistan during the last week.

Temperatures had been extremely cold since the beginning of 2008,

allowing snowfall to cover areas that do not normally receive large

amounts of snow. The recent warming has melted some of this excess snow, along with areas where the snowpack is

important for the coming growing season. This could result in some flooding, mainly in the north of the country. Much of

the central and northeastern portions of the country will remain very cold with temperature dropping below ‐18° C /0°F.

1) From February 22 to 26, extreme cold (temperature below  ‐18° C /0°F) is likely across central and northeastern

Afghanistan; these temperatures are colder than normal.

2) River is flooding possible from February 20 to 26 as a result of snow melting further up stream.

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan

Figure 2. Accumulated liquid precipitation forecast, in mm, 

Feb 20 - 26, 2008 

Source: NOAA

Figure 3. Approximate snow depth, in cm, Feb 18, 2008

Source: NOAA
#### Rosalia ARCO and Nardo Arco, her husband, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., a Foreign Corporation, and West American Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-766.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 17, 1981.

Ronald V. Alvarez and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine & Foster, P. A. West Palm Beach, for Appel-lee-West American Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

The final order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss the appellants’ complaint with prejudice is reversed on the authority of *South Carolina Insurance Co. v. Kokay,*298 So.2d 1355 (Fla.Case No. 58,830, Opinion filed May 21, 1981).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

DOWNEY, GLICKENSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.