alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Janet Spitler, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant
to [SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.

                                       Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ Janet P. Spitler
                                           Janet P. Spitler
                                           Treasurer
                                           (Chief Financial Officer)

                                           August 14, 2002
                                           ---------------
                                           Date
No. 99-8897.

#### McCoy *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
P.1 

/VfCOO/V/V-E-LL. DOUGLAS 

LAW DEPARTMENT 

16 September 1988 

Timothy Fields, Jr. 

Director of Emergency Response Division 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street, S.W. 

Mail Station OS/210 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Fields: 

This letter will serve to confirm our telephone 

conversation of Friday, September 16, 1988 in which I requested 

an extension of time to respond on behalf of McDonnell Douglas 

Corporation to EPA's proposed rule for reporting exemptions for 

federally permitted releases of hazardous substances, 53 FR 

27268, Tuesday, July 19, 1988. You informed me that an 

extension was being granted this date for comments until October 

19, 1988. 

Thank you for extending the comment time. I am sure it will 

result in improved comments on this vital matter. 

Sincerely, 

R. Brooks Pitchie 

Senior Corporate Attorney 

RBP:lro 

P.O. Box 516, Saint Louis, MO 63166-0516 (314) 232-0232 TELEX 44-857
§ 598.207 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 598.202 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 598.202 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
[86 FR 26668, May 17, 2021]
#### § 137.378 Do the Federal Davis-Bacon Act and wage rates apply to construction projects performed by Self-Governance Tribes using their own funds or other non-Federal funds?

No, the Federal Davis-Bacon Act and wage rates do not apply to construction projects performed by Self-Governance Tribes using their own funds or other non-Federal funds.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on April 29, 2009, (74 FR 19597), Rhodes Technologies, 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for conversion and sale to dosage form manufacturers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Rhodes Technologies to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Rhodes Technologies to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: August 21, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-21533 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, William
C. Marsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition  and
               result of operations of the Corporation.



/s/  William C. Marsh
---------------------

William C. Marsh
Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2006
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)





The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 30th day of April, 2009.








/s/ Donald J. Torbert, Jr.Donald J. Torbert, Jr.President and Interim Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Bretton Woods Agreements Act

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					 and 	Seventy-Ninth Congress, 1945-1947. 						*Bretton Woods Agreements Act : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Seventy-Ninth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3314, June 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, and 28, 1945*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										June 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, and 28, 1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/767,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 416.26 Qualifying for an agreement. ( a ) *Deemed compliance.* CMS may deem an ASC to be in compliance with any or all of the conditions set forth in subpart C of this part if— ( 1 ) The ASC is accredited by a national accrediting body, or licensed by a State agency, that CMS determines provides reasonable assurance that the conditions are met;
( 2 ) In the case of deemed status through accreditation by a national accrediting body, where State law requires licensure, the ASC complies with State licensure requirements; and
( 3 ) The ASC authorizes the release to CMS, of the findings of the accreditation survey.
( b ) *Survey of ASCs.* ( 1 ) Unless CMS deems the ASC to be in compliance with the conditions set forth in subpart C of this part, the State survey agency must survey the facility to ascertain compliance with those conditions, and report its findings to CMS.
( 2 ) CMS surveys deemed ASCs on a sample basis as part of CMS's validation process.
( c ) *Acceptance of the ASC as qualified to furnish ambulatory surgical services.* If CMS determines, after reviewing the survey agency recommendation and other evidence relating to the qualification of the ASC, that the facility meets the requirements of this part, it sends to the ASC— ( 1 ) Written notice of the determination; and
( 2 ) Two copies of the ASC agreement.
( d ) *Filing of agreement by the ASC.* If the ASC wishes to participate in the program, it must— ( 1 ) Have both copies of the ASC agreement signed by its authorized representative; and
( 2 ) File them with CMS.
( e ) *Acceptance by CMS.* If CMS accepts the agreement filed by the ASC, returns to the ASC one copy of the agreement, with a notice of acceptance specifying the effective date.
( f ) *Appeal rights.* If CMS refuses to enter into an agreement or if CMS terminates an agreement, the ASC is entitled to a hearing in accordance with part 498 of this chapter.
[56 FR 8843, Mar. 1, 1991]
§ 412.626 Transition period. ( a ) *Duration of transition period and proportion of the blended transition rate.* ( 1 ) Except for a facility that makes an election under paragraph (b) of this section, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2002 and before October 1, 2002, an inpatient rehabilitation facility receives a payment comprised of a blend of the adjusted Federal prospective payment, as determined under § 412.624(e) or § 412.624(f) and a facility-specific payment as determined under paragraph (a)(2) of this section. ( i ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2002 and before October 1, 2002, payment is based on 331 ⁄ 3 percent of the facility-specific payment and 662 ⁄ 3 percent of the adjusted FY 2002 Federal prospective payment.
( ii ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2002, payment is based entirely on the adjusted Federal prospective payment.
( 2 ) *Calculation of the facility-specific payment.* The facility-specific payment is equal to the payment for each cost reporting period in the transition period that would have been made without regard to this subpart. The facility's Medicare fiscal intermediary calculates the facility-specific payment for inpatient operating costs and capital-related costs in accordance with part 413 of this chapter.
( b ) *Election not to be paid under the transition period methodology.* An inpatient rehabilitation facility may elect a payment that is based entirely on the adjusted Federal prospective payment for cost reporting periods beginning before fiscal year 2003 without regard to the transition period percentages specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section. ( 1 ) *General requirement.* An inpatient rehabilitation facility will be required to request the election under this paragraph (b) within 30 days of its first cost reporting period for which payment is based on the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2002 and before October 1, 2002.
( 2 ) *Notification requirement to make election.* The request by the inpatient rehabilitation facility to make the election under this paragraph (b) must be made in writing to the Medicare fiscal intermediary. The intermediary must receive the request on or before the 30th day before the applicable cost reporting period begins, regardless of any postmarks or anticipated delivery dates. Requests received, postmarked, or delivered by other means after the 30th day before the cost reporting period begins will not be approved. If the 30th day before the cost reporting period begins falls on a day that the postal service or other delivery sources are not open for business, the inpatient rehabilitation facility is responsible for allowing sufficient time for the delivery of the request before the deadline. If an inpatient rehabilitation facility's request is not received timely or is otherwise not approved, payment will be based on the transition period rate specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
[66 FR 41388, Aug. 7, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 44077, July 1, 2002]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UN Deputy Secretary-General Mohammed

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UN Deputy Secretary-General Mohammed							

Press Statement

Office of the Spokesperson

December 10, 2022

On Saturday, December 10, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman will meet with Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations Amina Mohammed in Prague, Czech Republic.  In the meeting, the Deputy Secretary intends to underscore, among other issues, the important work of the UN in shaping global development priorities through the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals.  The Deputy Secretary and Deputy Secretary-General will also discuss urgent humanitarian issues, including food insecurity, the Black Sea Grain Initiative, and the ongoing instability in Haiti.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCzech RepublicDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6739]


Notice of Public Meeting

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES), Office of 
Marine Conservation announces that the Advisory Panel to the U.S. 
Section of the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission will meet on 
September 23, 2009.

DATES: The meeting will take place via teleconference on September 23, 
2009 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern time.
    Meeting Details: The teleconference call-in number is toll-free 1-
888-456-0348, passcode 20935, and will have a limited number of lines 
for members of the public to access from anywhere in the United States. 
Callers will hear instructions for using the passcode and joining the 
call after dialing the toll-free number noted. Members of the public 
wishing to participate in the teleconference must contact the OES 
officer in charge as noted in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section below no later than close of business on Monday, September 21, 
2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Field, Office of Marine 
Conservation, OES, Room 2758, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20520. Telephone (202) 647-3263, fax (202) 736-
7350, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccaaa5a9a0a8a6a88cbfb8adb8a9e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="204649454c444a446053544154450e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the requirements of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is given that the Advisory Panel 
to the U.S. Section of the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission 
(NPAFC) will meet on the date and time noted above. The panel consists 
of members from the states of Alaska and Washington who represent the 
broad range fishing and conservation interests in anadromous and 
ecologically related species in the North Pacific. Certain members also 
represent relevant state and regional authorities. The panel was 
established in 1992 to advise the U.S. Section of the NPAFC on research 
needs and priorities for anadromous species, such as salmon, and 
ecologically related species occurring in the high seas of the North 
Pacific Ocean. The upcoming Panel meeting will focus on three major 
topics: (1) Review of the agenda for the 2009 annual meeting of the 
NPAFC (November 2-6, 2009; Niigata, Japan); (2) logistics for the U.S. 
Section at the NPAFC meeting; and (3) the future status of the Panel. 
Background material is available from the point of contact noted above 
and by visiting http://www.npafc.org.

    Dated: September 1, 2009.
William Gibbons-Fly,
Director, Office of Marine Conservation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-21702 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### William R. Morgan, Appellant, *v.*Hiram Wood, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

October, 1898.)

Witness -r- Hostility.

The hostility of an adverse witness' may be proven by his cross-examination, or witnesses may be called who are able to swear to facts showing the hostility.

Aepeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, eleventh district, in favor of the defendant, rendered upon a trial had before the court, without a jury.

The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.

Theodore T. Baylor, for appellant.

Denis O’Sullivan, for respondent.

Giegerich, J.

This action was brought to recover $300, the amount of a certain check issued by one Jacob D. From, upon the Gansevoort Bank in the city of New York, payable to the order of the plaintiff, who, with his indorsement thereon, delivered the check to the defendant’s bookkeeper, for the purpose of having the same cashed. The latter indorsed the check and deposited it to the defendant’s credit in the aforementioned bank where the defendant also kept an account. The defendant’s bookkeeper subsequently withdrew said moneys and delivered the same-to the defendant. The latter admitted the receipt of said sum, but claimed payment through his bookkeeper. The plaintiff denied having. *740received any part of the amount called for by «the check, but the trial justice seems to have credited the defendant and his witnesses on this point, and that being the case, there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment which was rendered. Under such circumstances it is well established that this court will not disturb the conclusions of the trial justice upon questions of fact-.

Several exceptions were taken to the ruling of the justice upon questions of evidence. One related to the exclusion of a conversation had by the witness James Appelgate with the defendant’s bookkeeper; but as the testimony so excluded was subsequently admitted, the error, if any, was obviated.

. The defendant, against the plaintiff’s objection and exception, testified to threats of revenge made by the latter against him. This testimony was clearly admissible under the well-established rule that the hostility of a witness towards a party, against whom he is called, may be proven by any competent evidence. It may be shown by cross-examination of the witness, or witnesses may be called who can swear to facts.showing it. People v. Brooks, 131 N. Y. 325; Garnsey v. Rhodes, 138 id. 461; People v. Webster, 139 id. 73.

It is unnecessary to notice the other exceptions in the cáse, .as we are of thé opinion that they do not present any ground for a.' reversal.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Beekman, P. J., and Gildersleeve, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.