alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Strategic Plan
- Directorates
- Initiatives
- Releases

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Management...Bureau of Information Resource Management

# Bureau of Information Resource Management

## 				Our Mission			

					Our mission is to create an interconnected, secure, and informed Department through the prioritized, secure, and innovative application of IT resources. Our vision is to drive necessary and effective operations and collaboration across the Department, its partners, and foreign audiences.				

Chief Information Officer

Dr.  Kelly Fletcher

							Follow Us:																			Twitter

Back to Top
HomeAbout...Department of State Organization Chart

# 									Department of State Organization Chart							

Download Department of State Organization Chart, December 2023 (PowerPoint Version) [91 KB]

View Department of State Organization Chart, December 2023 (Accessible Text Version)

Download Department of State Organization Chart, December 2023 (PDF Version) [102 KB]

DOS Org Chart-Text Version-508 Accessible – Accessible 12.7.2023

 

Back to Top
§ 802.101 Scope. ( a ) Section 721 of title VII of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565) authorizes the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review transactions involving real estate that meet specified criteria, which are referred to in this part as “covered real estate transactions” and defined at § 802.212, and to mitigate any risk to the national security of the United States that arises as a result of such transactions. Section 721 also authorizes the President to suspend or prohibit any covered real estate transaction when, in the President's judgment, there is credible evidence that leads the President to believe that the foreign person engaging in a covered real estate transaction might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States, and when provisions of law other than section 721 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*) do not, in the judgment of the President, provide adequate and appropriate authority for the President to protect the national security of the United States in the matter before the President.
( b ) This part implements regulations pertaining to covered real estate transactions. Regulations pertaining to “covered transactions” are addressed in part 800 of this chapter.
#### Spencer G. WALL v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 80-C-2638.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 5, 1980.

In re New Orleans Public Service, Inc., applying for writ of certiorari or review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 389 So.2d 80.

Denied.

MARCUS and BLANCHE, JJ., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J.,

would grant the writ, set aside the jury verdict as abusive of its discretion, and remand to the court of appeal for fixing of quantum without assigning any weight whatsoever to either award by the jury.
# C_2005243EN.01000902.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof by order of that court of 17 May 2005 in Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas v ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH

(Case C-300/05)

(2005/C 243/14)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Bundesfinanzhof of 17 May 2005, received at the Court Registry on 27 July 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas and ZVK Zuchtvieh-Kontor GmbH on the following question:

Is the loading and unloading time part of the ‘travel’ time within the meaning of point 48(4)(d) of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC (1) on the protection of animals during transport (as amended by Directive 95/29/EC (2))?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 340, p. 17.

1

(2)  OJ 1995 L 148, p. 52.

2

---
HomeVietnam

# Vietnam

191 items

        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (06-531.3) – Agreement on Agriculture Biotechnology	  May 31, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (06-531.2) – Trade Agreement on Market Access for Beef and Beef By-Products	  May 31, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (05-727.1) – Agreement for Economic and Technical Cooperation	  July 27, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (04-114) – Air Transport Agreement	  January 14, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (13128) – Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation	  March 26, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (13076) – Project Incentive Agreement Regarding the Operations of the Export-Import Bank of the United States in Vietnam	  December 9, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (13015) – Agreement on the Establishment of Copyright Relations	  December 23, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (12936) – Agreement Regarding the Operations of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation in Vietnam	  March 26, 1998 
        -    		Charles  McMahon, Jr.	  April 29, 1975 
        -    		Darwin  Judge	  April 29, 1975 

previous page1…1617181920next page

Back to Top
#### § 38.8 Criminal and civil penalties.

Attention is called to section 317 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5157) which provides:

(a) Any individual who fraudulently or willfully misstates any fact in connection with a request for assistance under this Act shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both for each violation.

(b) Any individual who knowingly violates any order or regulation under this Act shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation.

(c) Whoever knowingly misapplies the proceeds of a loan or other cash benefit obtained under any section of this Act shall be subject to a fine in an amount equal to one and one half times the original principal amount of the loan or cash benefit.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Partners with GoFundMe.org

# 									Department of State Partners with GoFundMe.org							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 9, 2022

The Department of State’s Office of Global Partnerships has established a public-private partnership with GoFundMe.org to direct funds to organizations that are helping to address the humanitarian needs of those impacted by the Kremlin’s aggression against Ukraine.  This partnership with GoFundMe.org is designed to mobilize private-sector donations and individual giving to support relief organizations aiding those impacted by Russia’s actions.

Businesses, philanthropies, and individuals interested in supporting the humanitarian response can visit https://www.gofundme.com/f/ukraine-humanitarian-fund to learn more.  Please note: while recipient organizations identified have undergone due diligence, the Department must disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for donor and GoFundMe transactions relating to this fundraiser.

To help promote the campaign on social media, donors are encouraged to include the campaign’s website and the hashtag #UnitedWithUkraine in social media posts.

To learn more about how to partner with the U.S. Department of State, interested parties can contact the Office of Global Partnerships at partnerships@state.gov. For further updates, visit https://www.state.gov/united-with-ukraine/ or follow @GPatState on Twitter.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaOffice of Global PartnershipsUkraine

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

At its closed session meeting on August 4, 2009, the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting to be held on September 2, 2009, in Washington, DC via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was possible.

## Items Considered

1. Financial Matters.

2. Strategic Issues.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

## General Counsel Certification

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting is properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

## Contact Person for More Information

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-20952 Filed 8-27-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### § 401.303 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Medicare contractor* means a Part A/Part B Medicare Administrative Contractor (A/B MAC) or a Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractor (DME MAC).

*Overpayment* means any funds that a person has received or retained under title XVIII of the Act to which the person, after applicable reconciliation, is not entitled under such title.

*Person* means a provider (as defined in § 400.202 of this chapter) or a supplier (as defined in § 400.202 of this chapter).
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. James E. BERRY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 80-KH-2600.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 21, 1980.

In re James E. Berry, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. City Court.

Denied.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                             150
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                   150
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                     150
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                             2871
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                         70
[COMMON]                                         10280
[OTHER-SE]                                      (2721)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                       150
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                     1184
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (71682)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (71682)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (71682)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (71682)
[EPS-BASIC]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William B. TAYLOR v. Edwin A. LOMBARD, Clerk of Criminal Court.

No. 66589.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1980.

In re William B. Taylor applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. Number unknown.

Granted. Trial court is ordered to act within 14 days.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Richard Verma Travels to Qatar, Germany, the Netherlands, and Greece

# 									Deputy Secretary Richard Verma Travels to Qatar, Germany, the Netherlands, and Greece							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 23, 2023

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma will travel to Doha, Frankfurt, the Hague, and Athens from June 25-30, where he will discuss a range of U.S. priorities, including support for the people of Afghanistan, global security challenges, modernization, and regional support platforms.

For updates, follow Deputy Secretary Verma on Twitter.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesGermanyGreeceNetherlandsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelQatar

Back to Top
#### Greene LAWSON, Appellant, v. DREW CTI CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-917.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
40937.

#### ROYAL OIL COMPANY, INC. v. HOOKS.

Decided September 22, 1964.

*Casey Thigpen,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. W. Dukes,*contra.

Pannell, Judge.

Since the dismissal of an answer on demurrer is not such a final disposition of a cause as may be reviewed by this court, *Williams v. Kwik Shake Dispenser Mfg. Co.,*214 Ga. 478 (105 SE2d 457), Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230, *Code Ann.,*§ 6-701, the overruling of a demurrer to an answer “if it had been rendered as claimed by plaintiff in error” would not have been a final disposition of the cause. *Bello v. Milholland,*216 Ga. 162 (2) (115 SE2d 531). It follows, therefore, that the bill of exceptions brought by the plaintiff in the present case, assigning error on the overruling of demurrers to the answer of the defendant, must be

*Dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
#### § 8.32 Prompt disposition of pending matters.

No attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner may unreasonably delay the prompt disposition of any matter before the Bureau.
April11, 2013 Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W 12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 This is to inform the Department ofour objection to the termination ofEAS Eligibility for Lewistown, Montana. The termination ofthis service leaves this community of more than 6,000 people without ANY INTERCITY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WHATSOEVER. As who is now inhis eighties, I find this to be intolerable since it leaves me stranded in this city with no wayto leave except by the mercy ofothers who maybe going to the place I needto go for medical or other business purposes. I don't know howI will get to my cardiologist, for instance. In the large centers ofthe United States this is probably difficult to even imagine. Inthe hinterlands ofMontana, however, it is the reality with which we live. Ifthis service were connected to Denver, CO, it would be possible for me to make the arrangements that I need. IfI cannot get out oftown, I am even stranded without the availability ofsome necessary medical services.
Inrecent times, we have had a flight connecting to Billings, MT. This apparently was unsatisfactory to those who can drive for itwas easierto drive to Billings than to wait for an uncertain flight. For me, however, this was something I could use. Myplea is that you either restore the Billings service or, perhaps even better, return to the Denver connection.

Thank you for yourhelp. Sincerely, 

### 15o:nalak. {fjau Donald E. Pfau PO Box 780 Lewistown, MT 59457 C: dennis.devany@dot.gov, scott.faulk@dot.gov, eas@,dot.gov Senator Baucus; Senator Tester 

### · .. c:**-:~ ~-**  ._) --'
# C_2005336EN.01000101.xml

| 31.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 December 2005

(2005/C 336/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1797 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,9 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6853 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5551 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9563 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,86 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6802 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,88 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5924 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6109 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3725 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1474 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,727 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9628 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 184,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4642 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5204 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3715 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 596,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4584 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,719 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,92 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,437 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1797

JPY

Japanese yen

138,9

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6853

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5551

ISK

Iceland króna

74,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9563

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

29

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,86

RON

Romanian leu

3,6802

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,88

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5924

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6109

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3725

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1474

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,727

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9628

KRW

South Korean won

1 184,42

ZAR

South African rand

7,4642

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5204

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3715

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 596,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4584

PHP

Philippine peso

62,719

RUB

Russian rouble

33,92

THB

Thai baht

48,437

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005271EN.01000601.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 8 September 2005

in Case C-500/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 98/34/EC - Technical standards and regulations - National rules applicable to recreational craft)

(2005/C 271/10)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-500/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: A. Caeiros) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. I. Fernandes and M. J. Lois) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 26 November 2003 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and P. Kűris (Rapporteur), Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 September 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Portuguese Republic

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting Ministerial Decree No 783/98 of 19 September 1998 without having notified it to the Commission of the European Communities at the draft stage, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and the rules on information society services, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting Ministerial Decree No 783/98 of 19 September 1998 without having notified it to the Commission of the European Communities at the draft stage, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and the rules on information society services, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

1

---
# C_2006022EN.01001301.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/13

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM

(Case T-346/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE - Earlier figurative mark including the word element 'Arthur' - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 22/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Sadas SA (Tourcoing, France) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: LTJ Diffusion SA (Colombes, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum and S. Lederman, lawyers)

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Action

brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 June 2004 (Case R 393/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Sadas SA and LTJ Diffusion SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---