alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006092EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2006

(2006/C 92/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2346 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5688 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 95,95 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8105 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5761 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,525 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8977 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4802 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,380 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6430 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6596 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4063 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5736 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9462 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9722 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 167,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3624 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8926 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2995 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 994,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,523 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,347 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9110 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,567 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2346

JPY

Japanese yen

144,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69135

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3220

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5688

ISK

Iceland króna

95,95

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8105

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5761

CZK

Czech koruna

28,525

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8977

RON

Romanian leu

3,4802

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,380

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6430

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6596

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4063

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5736

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9462

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9722

KRW

South Korean won

1 167,38

ZAR

South African rand

7,3624

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8926

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2995

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 994,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,523

PHP

Philippine peso

63,347

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9110

THB

Thai baht

46,567

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 403.1201 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Biological product.* Biological product means any biological product, as that term is defined in Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”) section 351(i), that is licensed by the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to section 351 and is subject to the requirements of Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) section 503(b)(1).
( b ) *Prescription drug.* Prescription drug means any drug, as defined in the FDCA section 201(g), that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to FDCA section 505 and is subject to the requirements of FDCA section 503(b)(1).
( c ) *List price.* List price means the wholesale acquisition cost, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) *Wholesale acquisition cost.* Wholesale acquisition cost means, with respect to a prescription drug or biological product, the manufacturer's list price for the prescription drug or biological product to wholesalers or direct purchasers in the United States, not including prompt pay or other discounts, rebates or reductions in price, for the most recent month for which the information is available, as reported in wholesale price guides or other publications of drug or biological product pricing data.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (File Numbers 33-20181, 33-35182, 2-90595,
33-23899, 33-58305, 33-44477, 33-65024, 33-65177, 333-10419, 333-28257, 333-42469, 33-45822,
33-63297 and 333-49229 on Form S-8 and File Number 33-43574 on Form S-3) of Chiron Corporation of our report dated
January 28, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Chiron Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 and the related schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Chiron Corporation, and to the use of our name in Item 9 and Item 14(b) in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Chiron Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

San
Francisco, California
March 5, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0924 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-228-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Incorporate AFM 

TR in AFM 

Emergency

Procedure

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 953 $81,005.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $81,005

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# C_2005210EN.01001302.xml

| 27.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3693 — TPV/Philips (Monitors))

(2005/C 210/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3693. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3693. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### AMERICAN BANKERS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Peter J. MORLOCK, a/k/a P. J. Morlock, a/k/a Peter Morlock, Appellee.

No. 73-84.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# CA2006095DE.01000101.xml

| 22.4.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 95/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 95/1

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntgabe der allgemeinen Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/43-44/06 für die Bildung einer Einstellungsreserve von bulgarisch- und rumänischsprachigen Rechts- und Sprachsachverständigen (AD7)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 87 A vom 11. April 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 87 A vom 11. April 2006

(2006/C 95 A/01)

Seite 5, Titel „A. ART DER TÄTIGKEIT UND ZULASSUNGSBEDINGUNGEN (ANFORDERUNGSPROFIL)“, Punkt II.2, Zweig „Parlament, Rat, Kommission“:

anstatt:

anstatt:

| „d) | Fakultative Prüfungen
  Für die fakultative Prüfung 1) ist eine der folgenden Sprachen (Sprache 4) zu wählen, die nicht Sprache 1 und nicht Sprache 2 sein darf: Bulgarisch, Dänisch, Deutsch, Estnisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Irisch, Italienisch, Lettisch, Litauisch, Maltesisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Rumänisch, Schwedisch, Slowakisch, Slowenisch, Spanisch, Tschechisch oder Ungarisch.“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

Fakultative Prüfungen

Für die fakultative Prüfung 1) ist eine der folgenden Sprachen (Sprache 4) zu wählen, die nicht Sprache 1 und nicht Sprache 2 sein darf: Bulgarisch, Dänisch, Deutsch, Estnisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Irisch, Italienisch, Lettisch, Litauisch, Maltesisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Rumänisch, Schwedisch, Slowakisch, Slowenisch, Spanisch, Tschechisch oder Ungarisch.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

| „d) | Fakultative Prüfungen
  Für die fakultative Prüfung 1) ist eine der folgenden Sprachen (Sprache 4) zu wählen, die nicht Sprache 1, nicht Sprache 2 und nicht Sprache 3 sein darf: Bulgarisch, Dänisch, Deutsch, Estnisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Irisch, Italienisch, Lettisch, Litauisch, Maltesisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Rumänisch, Schwedisch, Slowakisch, Slowenisch, Spanisch, Tschechisch oder Ungarisch.“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

Fakultative Prüfungen

Für die fakultative Prüfung 1) ist eine der folgenden Sprachen (Sprache 4) zu wählen, die nicht Sprache 1, nicht Sprache 2 und nicht Sprache 3 sein darf: Bulgarisch, Dänisch, Deutsch, Estnisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Irisch, Italienisch, Lettisch, Litauisch, Maltesisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Rumänisch, Schwedisch, Slowakisch, Slowenisch, Spanisch, Tschechisch oder Ungarisch.“

---
#### Curtis BOBINGER, Jr. v. Mary Patricia P. BOBINGER.

No. 51348.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 1, 1979.

Crouch & Wiggins, John H. Crouch, Clinton, for appellant.

Thomas, Price, Alston, Jones & Davis, John H. Price, Jr., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

'Appeal from Chancery Court, Madison County; E. G. Cortright, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the filing by Wincroft, Inc. (the "Company") of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I,
      Bartly J. Loethen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




*Date:
                August**14**,
                2007*
            By:
            /s/ *Bartly
              J. Loethen**Bartly
                J. Loethen**Chief
              Financial Officer*
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Dedication of the Davis Conference Room at the Foreign Service Institute

# 									Dedication of the Davis Conference Room at the Foreign Service Institute							

Notice to the Press

Office of the Spokesperson

May 27, 2021

In honor of Ambassador (ret.) Ruth A. Davis’s 40-year distinguished career and commitment to diplomatic excellence, the Department of State’s Foreign Service Institute (FSI) is renaming its Director’s Conference Room as the Davis Conference Room. Dedicating this high visibility space on FSI’s campus to Ambassador Davis symbolizes the Department of State’s commitment to honoring her legacy as a groundbreaking and inspirational leader.

FSI will host the dedication ceremony on Friday, May 28, at 11:00 a.m. Acting Director of the Foreign Service Institute Julieta Valls Noyes, Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources Brian McKeon, and Acting Under Secretary for Management Carol Perez will deliver remarks.   Ambassador Davis will accept the dedication in front of a limited and socially distanced guest list. Additional guests will join via live stream.

This event is open to the press via pre-registered live stream.  To register and receive a link to the event live stream please visit here. For additional information, please contact FSI Public Affairs at FSIPublicAffairs@state.gov.

Tags

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesForeign Service InstituteOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
# C_2006060EN.01003205.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/32

---

Removal from the register of Case C-469/04 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/66)

(Language of the case: Greek)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 16 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-469/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18.12.2004.

1

---
#### Ex parte James Leroy PRICE. (Re James Leroy PRICE v. STATE of Alabama).

No. 79-501.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1980.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Reduces Processing Times, Breaks Records for Passport Issuances

# 									Department of State Reduces Processing Times, Breaks Records for Passport Issuances							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 2, 2023

The Department of State is committed to providing the best possible service for our passport customers while upholding strict national security standards.

Between October 2022 and September 2023 (the federal fiscal year), the State Department issued more than 24 million passport books and cards, the most ever in our nation’s history.

In addition to issuing more passports than ever before, we are also able to announce that we will provide Americans these services two weeks faster than prior processing times. Beginning October 2, 2023, passport processing times will be 8-11 weeks for routine service and 5-7 weeks for expedited service. These new processing times only apply to applications received on or after October 2. Processing times begin the day we receive an application and do not include mailing time.

Our dedicated staff have worked countless hours to reduce passport processing times. We are continuously reassessing our operations to maximize efficiencies and are introducing innovations to our customer service and processing models. We are investing in supporting and modernizing our technology, increased staffing levels by ten percent, and have hundreds of additional staff in the hiring pipeline. We remain focused on lowering processing times, and this reduction is an important first step.

We encourage anyone considering future international travel to check their passport’s validity early and often. Apply well in advance of your potential travel and at least 6-9 months ahead of your passport’s expiration date. Check your passport’s expiration date today and visit travel.state.gov to plan your 2024 travel with the latest passport guidance and travel information.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPassports

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41584

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

MAGDALENO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Gordo, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:94-CR-199-3 

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Magdaleno Rodriguez, federal prisoner # 61992-079, appeals the district 

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of his sentence 

based on Amendment 782 to United States Sentencing Guidelines and the 

denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. He contends that the district 

court erred in failing to evaluate the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and 

his postsentencing rehabilitation. We review the district court’s denial of a 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 14, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41584 Document: 00514114189 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2017
No. 16-41584

2 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 

667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). If a defendant is eligible for a reduction under 

§ 3582(c)(2), the district court must consider the relevant § 3553(a) factors to 

decide whether a sentence reduction is merited in whole or in part under the 

specific circumstances of the case. Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 827 

(2010).

Contrary to Rodriguez’s assertion, the district court stated that it had 

considered the § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293, 

297-98 (5th Cir. 2009). With respect to Rodriguez’s argument that the court 

did not consider his postsentencing conduct, the record shows that he 

documented his rehabilitation efforts in his motion and that the district 

court thus had that information before it. See Evans, 587 F.3d at 672-73. 

To the extent Rodriguez seeks to relitigate the appropriateness of the 

district court’s original findings regarding his role in the offense, he is not 

entitled to relief because a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding is not a full resentencing or 

an opportunity to challenge the original sentence. Dillon, 560 U.S. at 825-26;

United States v. Hernandez, 645 F.3d 709, 712 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has 

not shown that the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion was an abuse of the district 

court’s discretion. 

 Rodriguez also has not shown that the interests of justice required the 

appointment of counsel for his § 3582(c)(2) motion. The district court did not 

abuse its discretion in failing to appoint counsel. See Baranowski v. Hart, 486 

F.3d 112, 126 (5th Cir. 2007).

 AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 16-41584 Document: 00514114189 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2017
§ 415.190 Conditions of payment: Assistants at surgery in teaching hospitals. ( a ) *Basis, purpose, and scope.* This section describes the conditions under which Medicare pays on a fee schedule basis for the services of an assistant at surgery in a teaching hospital. This section is based on section 1842(b)(7)(D)(I) of the Act and applies only to hospitals with an approved GME residency program. Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, fee schedule payment is not available for assistants at surgery in hospitals with— ( 1 ) A training program relating to the medical specialty required for the surgical procedure; and
( 2 ) A resident in a training program relating to the specialty required for the surgery available to serve as an assistant at surgery.
( b ) *Definition. Assistant at surgery* means a physician who actively assists the physician in charge of a case in performing a surgical procedure.
( c ) *Conditions for payment for assistants at surgery.* Payment on a fee schedule basis is made for the services of an assistant at surgery in a teaching hospital only if the services meet one of the following conditions: ( 1 ) Are required as a result of exceptional medical circumstances.
( 2 ) Are complex medical procedures performed by a team of physicians, each performing a discrete, unique function integral to the performance of a complex medical procedure that requires the special skills of more than one physician.
( 3 ) Constitute concurrent medical care relating to a medical condition that requires the presence of, and active care by, a physician of another specialty during surgery.
( 4 ) Are medically required and are furnished by a physician who is primarily engaged in the field of surgery, and the primary surgeon does not use interns and residents in the surgical procedures that the surgeon performs (including preoperative and postoperative care).
( 5 ) Are not related to a surgical procedure for which CMS determines that assistants are used less than 5 percent of the time.
# Slovakia

84 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 2, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 2, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry Announces Project Phoenix Participants and the Nuclear Expediting the Energy Transition (NEXT) Program	  September 7, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Slovakia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks for CT Deputy Coordinator Ian Moss at the Counterterrorism Law Enforcement Forum 	  Ian MossJune 6, 2023Counterterrorism Law Enforcement ForumOslo, Norway 
        -    DipNote  		Transatlantic Fellow Program Deepens Bonds Between United States and Europe	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy and Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center Rubin’s Travel to Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Belgium	  May 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Slovakia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at an Interfaith Iftar in Bratislava Slovakia	  Uzra ZeyaApril 11, 2023Interfaith IftarBratislava, Slovakia. 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Slovakia and France April 11-14, 2023	  April 10, 2023 

previous page1234…9next page

Back to Top