alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006090EN.01000301.xml

| 13.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4137 — Mittal/Arcelor)

(2006/C 90/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 7 April 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Mittal Steel Company N.V. (‘Mittal’, The Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Arcelor S.A. (‘Arcelor’, Luxembourg) by way of public bid announced on 27 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 7 April 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Mittal Steel Company N.V. (‘Mittal’, The Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Arcelor S.A. (‘Arcelor’, Luxembourg) by way of public bid announced on 27 January 2006.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Mittal: manufacturing and sale of steel products at a world-wide level; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Mittal: manufacturing and sale of steel products at a world-wide level;

| — | for Arcelor: manufacturing and sale of steel products at a world-wide level. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Arcelor: manufacturing and sale of steel products at a world-wide level.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4137 — Mittal/Arcelor, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4137 — Mittal/Arcelor, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Former Representatives of the National Assembly of Serbia Verica Radeta and Petar Jojić for Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Designation of Former Representatives of the National Assembly of Serbia Verica Radeta and Petar Jojić for Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

January 27, 2023

The United States is designating former Serbian National Assembly Representatives Verica Radeta and Petar Jojić for their involvement in significant corruption. While serving in the National Assembly of Serbia, Radeta and Jojić bribed and intimidated witnesses scheduled to appear before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to dissuade them from offering incriminating evidence against Serbian Radical Party (c SRS) leader Vojislav Seselj, who was subsequently convicted of war crimes. Their conduct interfered with judicial processes, leading the ICTY to issue international arrest warrants for contempt, threatening regional stability, and adversely impacting the national interests of the United States.

These designations reaffirm the commitment of the United States to combat corruption, which harms the public interest, hampers partners’ economic prosperity, and curtails the ability of governments to respond effectively to the needs of their people. The United States continues to stand with all Serbians in support of democracy and the rule of law and will continue to promote accountability for those who abuse public power for personal gain.

These public designations — including that of Jojić’s adult son, Gojko Jojić — are made under Section 7031(c) of the annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act.

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCorruptionEconomic ParticipationOffice of the SpokespersonSerbia

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended December 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris               
|Nicholas Konidaris                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: January 4, 2007               

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6429

GREGORY GREEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRAVIS M. HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County; JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, 

II, Solicitor, Horry County; BRYAN STERLING, Director, South Carolina Department 

of Corrections; ALFREDO MORTELL, Warden, Manning Correctional Institution,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-03100-RBH-PJG)

Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Green appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part 

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Green’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims

against some of the defendants. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in 

Green’s informal brief, we find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry ANDERSON v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SECTION C et al.

No. 80-KH-2769.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Henry Anderson, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 260-387.

Denied. Moot.
§ 416.25 Basic requirements. Participation as an ASC is limited to facilities that— ( a ) Meet the definition in § 416.2; and
( b ) Have in effect an agreement obtained in accordance with this subpart.
[56 FR 8843, Mar. 1, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership II for
the year ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998      
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1998      
<CASH>                                                  498,376  
<SECURITIES>                                                  0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                           183,905  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             95,898  
<INVENTORY>                                                   0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,092,535  
<PP&E>                                               10,297,048  
<DEPRECIATION>                                        5,607,242  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        5,782,341  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   736,166  
<BONDS>                                               6,710,685  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                                   0  
<COMMON>                                                      0  
<OTHER-SE>                                                    0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          5,782,341  
<SALES>                                                       0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,930,721  
<CGS>                                                         0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,929,528  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      622,937  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (998,807) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0  
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0  
<CHANGES>                                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                                           (998,807) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (96.88) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0  
                                                           
                                                                 

</TABLE>
HomeDigital Connectivity and Cybersecurity Partnership

# Digital Connectivity and Cybersecurity Partnership

            - Catalyzing economically sustainable and secure private sector network investments
            - Promoting regulatory reforms
            - Encouraging adoption of strong cybersecurity and data privacy best practices

As the adoption of digital technology rapidly advances across the globe, DCCP works with partners to ensure this transformation promotes inclusive growth and fosters resilient and democratic societies.

Download DCCP Fact Sheet [741 KB]

##### Promoting an Open, Interoperable, Reliable, and Secure and Trusted Internet in Emerging Global Markets

Back to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
PRIVATE LAW 106–21—NOV. 22, 2000

Private Law 106–21

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Guy Taylor.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GUY TAYLOR.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Guy Taylor

shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment

of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa

under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

permanent resident.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Guy Taylor enters the United

States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he

shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and

shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

the date of enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status

are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of

enactment of this Act.

Nov. 22, 2000

[S. 2000]

PRIVATE LAW 106–21—NOV. 22, 2000

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the

granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Guy

Taylor, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

to reduce by one, during the current or next following fiscal year,

the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to

natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a)

of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives

of the country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

Act.

Approved November 22, 2000.
EXHIBIT
      32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert K. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
November 5,
2009                                                    /s/  Robert K.
Bench


Robert K.
Bench


Chief
Financial Officer











This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Croatia Statehood Day

# 									Croatia Statehood Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 30, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our best wishes to the people of Croatia as you celebrate your Statehood Day.

For over 30 years, our two nations have been tied together by shared values and deep friendship. In the year ahead, I look forward to continuing to strengthen our defense partnership, enhancing regional energy security, bolstering trade and investment ties, and confronting the climate crisis. We must also advance the Euro-Atlantic integration of Western Balkan countries and address urgent challenges around the world, including Putin’s brutal war against Ukraine. We are proud to stand together as NATO Allies and thank Croatia for its important contributions to our collective security and transatlantic prosperity.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCroatiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Stewart and Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Brussels

# 									Assistant Secretary Stewart and Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Brussels							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 23, 2023

Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance Mallory Stewart and Acting Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Jennifer R. Littlejohn will co-lead an interagency U.S. delegation to the 12th United States – European Union Space Dialogue taking place in Brussels June 26-27.  The delegation will include representatives from NASA, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Defense, NOAA, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Assistant Secretary Stewart will co-chair the security portions of the dialogue with her counterparts from the European External Action Service, Managing Director Benedikta von Seherr-Thoss, and the European Commission’s Director General for Defense Industry and Space (DEFIS) Timo Pesonen.  These sessions will focus on opportunities for expanded U.S.-EU cooperation to address threats to shared security interests, enhance stability in space, and improve the cybersecurity of space systems.

Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn will co-chair the civil space portions of the dialogue with her EU counterpart, Director General Pesonen.  Their discussion will focus on space situational awareness and spaceflight safety, coordination and sharing of Earth observation data, commercial space transportation, and global navigation satellite navigation systems.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov and AVC-Press-DL@state.gov.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
# C_2006022EN.01001901.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/19

---

Action brought on 8 November 2005 — A.S.TER v Commission

(Case T-409/05)

(2006/C 22/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant(s): Società A.S.TER S.p.A. (Genova, Italy) (represented by: Lorenzo Acquarone and Daniela Anselmi)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested measures and, as a result, grant rights of access and therefore release a full copy of the complaint and the annexes thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measures and, as a result, grant rights of access and therefore release a full copy of the complaint and the annexes thereto;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in the present action, a limited liability company most of whose capital is held by the Municipality of Genoa, seeks annulment of the defendant's decision rejecting access, under Article 7(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, to the complaint (and annexes thereto) sent to the Commission on 21 February 2005, which gave rise to an investigation which may lead to initiation of formal infringement proceedings against the applicant.

1

Access was withheld on the basis that disclosure might have had an adverse impact on the conduct of the investigation by the Commission.

In support of its claims, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001, of the principle audi alteram partem and of the principles of transparency, cooperation and participation in proceedings, and also lack of an adequate statement of reasons.

It submits in that regard that there is, despite the defendant's claim, no need to withhold distribution of documents relating to the infringement proceedings in order to avoid undermining the inquiries, but that, on the contrary, it is necessary for the purpose of such inquiries for the procedure to be conducted with the greatest transparency and cooperation, so that the Municipality of Genoa and the applicant can produce the documentation required for conduct of the investigations.

Furthermore, since the applicant is a party to administrative proceedings before the defendant, the contested decision infringes the principle audi alteram partem.

The applicant adds that objections to rights of access must be interpreted restrictively and in the light of the principle entitlement to information and the principle of proportionality.

---

(1)  OJ L 145 of 31.5.2001, p. 43.

1

---