alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006043EN.01000301.xml

| 21.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4045 — Deutsche Bahn/Bax Global)

(2006/C 43/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4045. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4045. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 32

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mammatech Corporation
(the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"),
we, Henry S. Pennypacker, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mary Bailey
Sellers, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By:  /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                          Dated: December 16, 2004
     -----------------------------------------
     Henry S. Pennypacker
     Title: President, Chief Executive Officer


     /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
     -----------------------------------------
     Mary Bailey Sellers
     Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### Road in Jackson Township.

Where there is on the files of the court a draft of a road, to vacate which proceedings are commenced, a draft of the road thus vacated, need not he returned by the viewers, although the order of the court direct it to be done.

Certiorari to the Quarter Sessions of Northumberland.

*Aug.*3. A road had been laid out and confirmed by the court, a draft of which accompanied the report of the viewers, but it had not been opened. A petition to vacate was then presented, and the order of the court directed the viewers to report whether they would vacate, or affirm the road, “with a draft of the road vacated.” The viewers reported that the road was useless and burdensome, but omitted to annex a draft of the road. On this ground, the report was set aside.

*86
      *Gh'eenough*and *Packer,*for appellants.

The records of the court contained a draft, and a duplicate was unnecessary.

*Jordan*and *Segins,*contrA

*Aug.*5.

Bell, J.

The Court of Quarter Sessions set aside the report of November, 1847, vacating the road, because they omitted to return a draft of the road vacated. But this was obviously unnecessary and useless, as the court was already in possession of a plan returned by the viewers, who reported in favour of the road. If authority be required to show this was sufficient, it will be found in the case of the Abington road, 14 S. & R. 31. That the order to vacate directed the viewers to return a plan, makes no difference. As the law does not require it, this direction was superfluous, and might, therefore, be properly disregarded as a mere interpolation by the clerk.

The order of the Court of Quarter Sessions setting aside the report vacating the said road, is reversed, and the said report confirmed.
# C_2005173EN.01000701.xml

| 13.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3844 — IBM/Global Value)

(2005/C 173/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3844. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3844. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001029863
<NAME> AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         112,174
<SECURITIES>                                    15,617
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,453
<INVENTORY>                                     49,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               338,003
<PP&E>                                       1,089,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 382,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,507,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          498,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           497
<OTHER-SE>                                     713,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,507,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,210,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,006,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                    86,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.17<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.03
<FN>
<F1>EPS Basic represents basic net income per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2005217EN.01004401.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/44

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 22 June 2005

in Case T-171/05 R: Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities

(Proceedings for interim relief - Officials - Suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility)

(2005/C 217/96)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-171/05 R: Bart Nijs, official of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities, residing in Bereldange (Luxembourg), represented by F. Rollinger, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Agents: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens, with an address for service in Luxembourg): application to suspend the operation of the Court of Auditors' decision of 2 December 2004 to promote an official other than the applicant to the post of principal translator at grade LA5 in the Dutch Section of the Translation Service of the General Secretariat of the Court of Auditors — the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 22 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2047

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Roscoe Chambers, also known as Tommy lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: August 11, 2022 Filed: August 16, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Roscoe Chambers appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 2 years in prison and 8 years of supervised release. His

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the

sentence. Chambers has filed a pro se brief arguing that he did not violate the terms of his supervised release and challenging the sentence. As to the argument in counsel’s brief, after careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Chambers, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason for court’s decision); and the sentence was below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (maximum revocation prison term is 5 years for Class A felony); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) (maximum supervised release term is life). As to Chambers’s remaining pro se arguments, we conclude that the district court did not err in finding that he had violated the terms of his supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke supervised release if it finds by preponderance of evidence that defendant violated condition of supervised release); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d at 913-14 (this court reviews decision to revoke supervised release for abuse of discretion, and underlying factual findings as to whether a violation occurred for clear error); United States v. Farmer, 567 F.3d 343, 347 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing limited right to confrontation at revocation hearing). We also conclude that Chambers may not challenge his original classification as a career offender in this proceeding. See Miller, 557 F.3d at 913 (defendant may not challenge validity of his underlying sentence through collateral attack in supervised release revocation proceeding). -2-Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-3-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc.
     ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the
     Report"), I, Ronald E. Kimbrough, Acting Principal Executive Officer and
     Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
     1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                    amended; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.



     /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough


     Ronald E. Kimbrough
     Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
     August 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                     14,212,100
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  74,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           14,286,900 
<PP&E>                                      6,325,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,497,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,248,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       8,548,600
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 14,656,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               23,248,100
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,380,300
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 199,500 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               63,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,127,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,127,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                2,127,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   24.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   24.10
        

</TABLE>
#### § 137.67 How may a Self-Governance Tribe use interest earned on statutorily mandated grant funds?

Interest earned on such funds must be used to enhance the grant program including allowable administrative costs.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2937

AN ACT

For the reimbursement of attorney fees and costs

19, 1993.nation of their employment in that Office on MayHouse Travel Office with respect to the termiincurred by former employees of the White
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2937

AN ACT

For the reimbursement of attorney fees and costs incurred

by former employees of the White House Travel Office

with respect to the termination of their employment in

that Office on May 19, 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2937 EH

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN ATTORNEY

2 FEES AND COSTS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

4 shall pay, from amounts in the Treasury not otherwise ap5 propriated, such sums as are necessary to reimburse

6 former employees of the White House Travel Office whose

7 employment in that Office was terminated on May 19,

8 1993, for any attorney fees and costs they incurred with

9 respect to that termination.

10 (b) VERIFICATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall

11 pay an individual in full under subsection (a) upon sub12 mission by the individual of documentation verifying the

13 attorney fees and costs.

14 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Liability of the

15 United States shall not be inferred from enactment of or

16 payment under this section.

17 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FILING OF CLAIMS.

18 The Secretary of the Treasury shall not pay any

19 claim filed under this Act that is filed later than 120 days

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

21 SEC. 3. REDUCTION.

22 The amount paid pursuant to this Act to an individ23 ual for attorney fees and costs described in section 1 shall

24 be reduced by any amount received before the date of the

25 enactment of this Act, without obligation for repayment

26 by the individual, for payment of such attorney fees and
3

•HR 2937 EH

1 costs (including any amount received from the funds ap2 propriated for the individual in the matter relating to the

3 ‘‘Office of the General Counsel’’ under the heading ‘‘Office

4 of the Secretary’’ in title I of the Department of Transpor5 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1994).

6 SEC. 4. PAYMENT IN FULL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS

7 AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

8 Payment under this Act, when accepted by an indi9 vidual described in section 1, shall be in full satisfaction

10 of all claims of, or on behalf of, the individual against the

11 United States that arose out of the termination of the

12 White House Travel Office employment of that individual

13 on May 19, 1993.

Passed the House of Representatives March 19,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 99-1852.

#### Sklaroff *v.*Pennsylvania, by Fisher, Attorney General, et al. (two judgments).

Commw. Ct. Pa. Motion of Jon D. Fox for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*denied. Motion of petitioner for sanctions denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 76-6120.

#### Wallace *v.*Wyrick, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         39,569
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            359
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                2,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   353,714
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       782,808
<ALLOWANCE>                                    11,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,219,311
<DEPOSITS>                                    962,610
<SHORT-TERM>                                   79,219
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            13,015
<LONG-TERM>                                    11,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       42,703
<OTHER-SE>                                    110,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              1,219,311
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                68,508
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              20,126
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  265
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               88,899
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             33,125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             36,543
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          52,356
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     855
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                315
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                33,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,667
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     20,031
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.07
<LOANS-NON>                                       437
<LOANS-PAST>                                    2,492
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   312
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               11,038
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     813
<RECOVERIES>                                      160
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              11,240
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            5,486
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         5,754
        


</TABLE>