alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   Exhibit 11
                                  (unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED                       SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                JUNE 30,                                JUNE 30,
                                                         1999                 1998               1999               1998
                                                         ----                 ----               ----               ----
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
Net income  (loss)                                    $(1,658,964)        $   466,778        $(1,513,932)        $ 2,812,208
                                                      ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                               7,686,180           8,109,950          7,670,742           8,105,700

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options                    86,061             276,844            217,712             326,702

Convertible preferred stock                                    --                  --                 --                  --

Subtraction of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                       (86,061)                 --           (217,712)                 --
                                                      -----------         -----------        -----------         -----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                                 7,686,180           8,386,794          7,670,742           8,432,402
                                                      ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========




Basic net income (loss) per share                     $     (0.22)        $      0.06        $     (0.20)        $      0.35
                                                      ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========


Diluted net income (loss) per share                   $     (0.22)        $      0.06        $     (0.20)        $      0.33
                                                      ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
#### § 137.172 Should the audit report be sent anywhere else to ensure receipt by the Secretary?

Yes, the Self-Governance Tribe should also send the audit report to: National External Audit Review Center, Lucas Place Room 514, 323 W. 8th St., Kansas City, MO 64105.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlows in Pinned Arrays Simulating Brush SealsFlows through idealized pin arrays were investigated using an unstructured grid finite difference model and the simplified Ergun model to predict leakage flows and pressure drops in brush seals. The models are in good agreement in the laminar region with departures in the laminar-turbulent transition region defined by the simplified Ergun model. No local disturbances in the velocity or pressure fields, symptomatic of turbulence were found in the numerical results. The simplified model failed to predict the pressure drop of a 32-pin anisotropic array. Transitional and anisotropic behavior requiresDocument ID19970011036Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHendricks, R.C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Kudriavtsev, V. V.*(Watkins-Johnson Co. Scotts Valley, CA United States)*Braun, M. J.*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH United States)*Athavale, M. M.*(CFD Research Corp. Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-10459NAS 1.15:107333NASA-TM-107333Meeting InformationMeeting: International Congress on Fluid Dynamics and PropulsionLocation: Cairo, EGCountry: United StatesStart Date: December 29, 1996End Date: December 31, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,Cairo Univ.Accession Number97N16085Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: RTOP-233-1B-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970011036.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2005330EN.01002101.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Micha v Commission

(Case T-50/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Reporting procedure for 1999/2001 - Staff report - Action for annulment - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Delay in drawing up staff report)

(2005/C 330/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Emmanuel Micha (Roeser, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

Annulment of the decision drawing up a definitive staff report for the applicant for the period from 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2001

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders the Commission to pay its own costs in addition to two thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Commission to pay its own costs in addition to two thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1101

OSCAR DAVID SANCHEZ SANTOS,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 12, 2019 Decided: September 20, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant 

Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Ann M. Welhaf, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oscar David Sanchez Santos, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for withholding of removal and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Sanchez 

Santos’ merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence 

does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that 

the Department of Homeland Security rebutted any presumption of a well-founded fear of 

persecution by establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Sanchez Santos could 

“avoid a future threat to his . . . life or freedom by relocating to another part of [El Salvador] 

and, under all the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect [him] to do so.” 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.16(b)(1)(B) (2019). We further conclude that substantial evidence supports the 

denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture. See Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 

F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Sanchez Santos, (B.I.A. Dec. 

27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #26, July 2 - 8, 2008

Temperatures continue to remain above normal across 

most of Afghanistan, depleting much of the country’s 

snow pack 4 – 6 weeks earlier than normal. Snow pack is 

critical because it is used for irrigation in lowland areas.

The remaining snow pack now resides only in the highest 

elevations of northeast Afghanistan. High temperatures 

have also led to increased evaporation from water 

reservoirs threatening water availability for crop 

production and pasture. 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan is below normal 

as well (Figure 2) and as a result underground water 

sources, which are used for both drinking water and 

irrigation, have not been replenished.. The cumulative 

effect of this situation will have a direct bearing on most 

households, who rely on agriculture and livestock for their 

income and food needs. 

For the upcoming week, maximum temperatures will 

exceed 38 °C in the lowlands and weekly temperatures 

will average 3 to 5 °C above normal across much of the 

country. 

1) Much of Afghanistan has received below normal

precipitation during the winter and spring along with an

early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures above 38 °C)

will affect the lowlands of Afghanistan and continue to

increase water evaporation.

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan as of July 1, 

2008 

Figure 2. Accumulated liquid precipitation 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS 

Figure 3. Mean Temperature Anomaly – June 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS
HomeIsrael

# Israel

902 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At McCain Institute’s 2024 Sedona Forum Keynote Conversation with Senator Mitt Romney	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 3, 2024Sedona, Arizona  
        -    DipNote  		Building Partnerships for Innovation and Safe Tech Around the World	  Richard R. VermaMay 3, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 2, 2024	  Matthew MillerMay 2, 2024 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Andrea Mitchell of NBC	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 1, 2024Ashdod PortAshdod, Israel 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Chairman of Israel’s Yesh Atid Party, Yair Lapid	  May 1, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 1, 2024Ashdod PortAshdod, Israel 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Minister Gantz	  May 1, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli President Herzog	  May 1, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu	  May 1, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to Demonstrators	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 1, 2024Tel AvivIsrael 

previous page123456…91next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward BROUSSARD v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65747.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Edward Broussard, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Jefferson. No. 77-2118.

Denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFriction and Wear of Ion-Beam-Deposited Diamondlike Carbon on Chemical-Vapor-Deposited, Fine-Grain DiamondFriction and wear behavior of ion-beam-deposited diamondlike carbon (DLC) films coated on chemical-vapor-deposited (CVD), fine-grain diamond coatings were examined in ultrahigh vacuum, dry nitrogen, and humid air environments. The DLC films were produced by the direct impact of an ion beam (composed of a 3:17 mixture of Ar and CH4) at ion energies of 1500 and 700 eV and an RF power of 99 W. Sliding friction experiments were conducted with hemispherical CVD diamond pins sliding on four different carbon-base coating systems: DLC films on CVD diamond; DLC films on silicon; as-deposited, fine-grain CVD diamond; and carbon-ion-implanted, fine-grain CVD diamond on silicon. Results indicate that in ultrahigh vacuum the ion-beam-deposited DLC films on fine-grain CVD diamond (similar to the ion-implanted CVD diamond) greatly decrease both the friction and wear of fine-grain CVD diamond films and provide solid lubrication. In dry nitrogen and in humid air, ion-beam-deposited DLC films on fine-grain CVD diamond films also had a low steady-state coefficient of friction and a low wear rate. These tribological performance benefits, coupled with a wider range of coating thicknesses, led to longer endurance life and improved wear resistance for the DLC deposited on fine-grain CVD diamond in comparison to the ion-implanted diamond films. Thus, DLC deposited on fine-grain CVD diamond films can be an effective wear-resistant, lubricating coating regardless of environment.Document ID19970010116Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMiyoshi, Kazuhisa*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Wu, Richard L. C.*(K Systems Corp. Dayton, OH United States)*Lanter, William C.*(K Systems Corp. Dayton, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10320NAS 1.15:107316NASA-TM-107316Accession Number97N15350Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-5ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010116.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt (END) Wildlife Trafficking Act Report 2021

# 									Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt (END) Wildlife Trafficking Act Report 2021							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 4, 2021

The U.S. Department of State submitted the fifth annual report to Congress as required by the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (the END Wildlife Trafficking Act). Wildlife trafficking is a serious transnational crime that undermines security, economic prosperity, the rule of law, long-standing conservation efforts, and human health through the spread of zoonotic diseases.

The END Wildlife Trafficking Act directs the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce, to submit to Congress a report that lists Focus Countries and Countries of Concern, as defined in the Act. Each Focus Country is a major source, transit point, or consumer of wildlife trafficking products or their derivatives. The identification as a Focus Country does not reflect a positive or negative designation or indicate that these countries are not working diligently to combat wildlife trafficking. A Country of Concern is defined as a Focus Country whose government has actively engaged in or knowingly profited from the trafficking of endangered or threatened species.

The 2021 Focus Countries are Bangladesh, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, China, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Laos, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Mozambique, Nigeria, Philippines, Republic of the Congo, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe. The 2021 Countries of Concern are Cambodia, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Laos, Madagascar, and Nigeria.

For more information, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateWildlife Trafficking

Back to Top
#### Solomon Levy, Respondent, *v.*The American Wax & Paper Manufacturing Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

July, 1898.)

Warranty — Counterclaim.

Where an order for Japan wax describes the goods as prime, and the bill therefor of the vendor so describes them, there is a warranty that the goods sold were of that quality; the warranty attaches to subsequent similar orders and entitles the vendee to interpose, to an action for the price, a counterclaim for an adulteration.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Oourt of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district, in favor of the plaintiff.

William Victor Goldberg, for appellant.

Samuel Greenbaum, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The .order first given to the plaintiff for Japan wax described the article as “ prime,” and the bill rendered by the plaintiff therefor described it in similar terms.' We think that this •constituted a warranty that the goods sold were of that quality. Zabriskie v. C. V. R. R. Co., 131 N. Y. 72. As all of the subsequent orders given referred expressly to the previous one, the warranty extended also to the goods thus sold. It. appears that the wax in question was grossly adulterated, and was not prime Japan wax. The defendant was, therefore, entitled to recover such *205damages as he might be able to prove under his counterclaim founded upon the warranty. As he was not permitted to do so, the judgment must be reversed.

■Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1250 Benchmarks for quality of care measures. ( a ) The benchmark for quality of care measures reported through the PQRS using the claims, registries, QCDR, or web interface is the national mean for that measure's performance rate (regardless of the reporting mechanism) during the year prior to the performance period. In calculating the national benchmark, solo practitioners' and groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rates are weighted by the number of beneficiaries used to calculate the solo practitioners' or groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rate. Beginning with the CY 2016 performance period, eCQMs reported via EHRs are excluded from the overall benchmark for quality of care measures and separate eCQM benchmarks will be developed. The eCQM benchmark is the national mean for the measure's performance rate during the year prior to the performance period. In calculating the national benchmark, solo practitioners' and groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rates are weighted by the number of beneficiaries used to calculate the solo practitioners' or groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rate.
( b ) The benchmark for each outcome measure under § 414.1230, is the national mean for that measure's performance rate during the year prior to the performance period. In calculating the national benchmark, solo practitioners' and groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rates are weighted by the number of beneficiaries used to calculate the solo practitioners' or groups' (or individual eligible professionals' within such groups) performance rate.
[79 FR 68007, Nov. 13, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 71384, Nov. 16, 2015]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40509

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ALFREDO VILLANUEVA-NUNEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-1117-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alfredo

Villanueva-Nunez (Villanueva) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villanueva has not filed a

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40509 Document: 00511699881 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
No. 11-40509

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40509 Document: 00511699881 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
#### Larry William GANTT, Appellant, v. John POLK, Sheriff of Seminole County, Appellee.

No. 73-1470.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Zambia

81 items

        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Zambia	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refuges in South Africa and Zambia	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Zambia	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Zambia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Zambia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  June 20, 2019 

previous page1…456789next page

Back to Top