alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 412.434 Reconsideration and appeals procedures of Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program decisions. ( a ) An inpatient psychiatric facility may request reconsideration of a decision by CMS that the inpatient psychiatric facility has not met the requirements of the IPFQR Program for a particular fiscal year. An inpatient psychiatric facility must submit a reconsideration request to CMS no later than 30 days from the date identified on the IPFQR Program Annual Payment Update Notification Letter provided to the inpatient psychiatric facility.
( b ) A reconsideration request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The inpatient psychiatric facility's CMS Certification Number (CCN);
( 2 ) The name of the inpatient psychiatric facility;
( 3 ) Contact information for the inpatient psychiatric facility's chief executive officer and QualityNet security official, including each individual's name, email address, telephone number, and physical mailing address;
( 4 ) A summary of the reason(s), as set forth in the IPFQR Program Annual Payment Update Notification Letter, that CMS concluded the inpatient psychiatric facility did not meet the requirements of the IPFQR Program;
( 5 ) A detailed explanation of why the inpatient psychiatric facility believes that it complied with the requirements of the IPFQR Program for the applicable fiscal year; and
( 6 ) Any evidence that supports the inpatient psychiatric facility's reconsideration request, such as emails and other documents.
( c ) An inpatient psychiatric facility that is dissatisfied with a decision made by CMS on its reconsideration request may file an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board under part 405, subpart R of this chapter.
[77 FR 53678, Aug. 31, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 42678, Aug. 4, 2021]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75227-75228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8977]

Overseas Schools Advisory Council Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Annual Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 22, 2015, at 
9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1105, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public and will 
last until approximately 12:00 p.m.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas that are assisted by the Department of State and attended by 
dependents of U.S. Government employees, and the children of employees 
of U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools. There will be a report and 
discussion about the status of the Council-sponsored project to expand 
the World Virtual School. The Regional Education Officers in the Office 
of Overseas Schools will make a presentations on the activities and 
initiatives in the American-sponsored overseas schools.
    Members of the public may attend the meeting and join in the 
discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of 
public members will be

[[Page 75228]]

limited to the seating available. Access to the State Department is 
controlled, and individual building passes are required for all 
attendees. Persons who plan to attend should advise the office of Dr. 
Keith D. Miller, Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools, 
telephone 202-261-8200, prior to January 15, 2015. Each visitor will be 
asked to provide his/her date of birth and either driver's license or 
passport number at the time of registration and attendance, and must 
carry a valid photo ID to the meeting.
    Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus 
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public 
Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of 
the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter 
Department facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access 
Control System (VACS-D) database. Please see the Security Records 
System of Records Notice (State-36) at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/103419.pdf for additional information.
    Any requests for reasonable accommodation should be made at the 
time of registration. All such requests will be considered, however, 
requests made after January 20th might not be possible to fill. All 
attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.

    Dated: December 9, 2014.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 2014-29598 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
EXHIBIT 32
                                                             ----------

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                     THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A
of Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc. (the "Company"),
for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Andrew L. Simon, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc., to the best of my knowledge, that:

            1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
            2.	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 8, 2005

                                         By: /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
                                             --------------------------
                                             Andrew L. Simon,
                                             President, Chief Executive
                                             Officer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Touchstone Applied Science Associates,
Inc. and will be retained by Touchstone Applied Science
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.54 Mental health counselor services. ( a ) *Definition: mental health counselor.* For purposes of this part, a *mental health counselor* is defined as an individual who— ( 1 ) Possesses a master's or doctor's degree which qualifies for licensure or certification as a mental health counselor, clinical professional counselor, professional counselor under the State law of the State in which such individual furnishes the services defined as mental health counselor services;
( 2 ) After obtaining such a degree, has performed at least 2 years or 3,000 hours of post master's degree clinical supervised experience in mental health counseling in an appropriate setting such as a hospital, SNF, private practice, or clinic; and
( 3 ) Is licensed or certified as a mental health counselor, clinical professional counselor, professional counselor by the State in which the services are performed.
( b ) *Covered mental health counselor services.* Medicare Part B covers mental health counselor services. ( 1 ) *Definition: Mental health counselor services* means services furnished by a mental health counselor (as defined in paragraph (a) of this section) for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses (other than services furnished to an inpatient of a hospital), which the mental health counselor is legally authorized to perform under State law (or the State regulatory mechanism provided by State law) of the State in which such services are furnished. The services must be of a type that would be covered if they were furnished by a physician or as an incident to a physician's professional service and must meet the requirements of this section.
( 2 ) *Exception.* The following services are not mental health counselor services for purposes of billing Medicare Part B: ( i ) Services furnished by a mental health counselor to an inpatient of a Medicare-participating hospital.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Prohibited billing.* ( 1 ) A mental health counselor may not bill Medicare for the services specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) A mental health counselor or an attending or primary care physician may not bill Medicare or the beneficiary for the consultation that is required under paragraph(b)(2) of this section.
[88 FR 79527, Nov. 16, 2023]
# C_2006058EN.01000101.xml

| 10.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 March 2006

(2006/C 58/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1920 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4596 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4299 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5635 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,67 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,700 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 257,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4939 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,54 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,527 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6015 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6194 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3793 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2513 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8328 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9396 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 170,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4667 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5932 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3178 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 089,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,434 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,233 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,4270 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,568 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1920

JPY

Japanese yen

140,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4596

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4299

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5635

ISK

Iceland króna

82,67

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

28,700

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

257,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8763

RON

Romanian leu

3,4939

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,54

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,527

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6015

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6194

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3793

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2513

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8328

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9396

KRW

South Korean won

1 170,60

ZAR

South African rand

7,4667

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5932

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3178

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 089,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,434

PHP

Philippine peso

61,233

RUB

Russian rouble

33,4270

THB

Thai baht

46,568

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006060EN.01003001.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/30

---

Action brought on 17 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-22/06)

(2006/C 60/57)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 17 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Michel Nolin, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/105/EC of 15 October 2004 determining the models of official phytosanitary certificates or phytosanitary certificates for re-export accompanying plants, plant products or other objects from third countries and listed in Council Directive 2000/29/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/105/EC of 15 October 2004 determining the models of official phytosanitary certificates or phytosanitary certificates for re-export accompanying plants, plant products or other objects from third countries and listed in Council Directive 2000/29/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2004/105 expired on 31 December 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 319, p. 9

1

---
# C_2005205EN.01002701.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/27

---

Action brought on 10 June 2005 by Olivier Chassagne against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-224/05)

(2005/C 205/49)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 June 2005 by Olivier Chassagne, residing in Brussels, represented by Stéphane Rodrigues and Yola Minatchy, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare unlawful, and therefore inapplicable to the applicant, Article 8 of Annex VII to the new Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare unlawful, and therefore inapplicable to the applicant, Article 8 of Annex VII to the new Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities;

| — | award the applicant EUR one (1) by way of compensation for the non-pecuniary damage sustained and the sum of EUR seven thousand three hundred and seventy two (7 372) by way of compensation for the financial damage sustained; |
| --- | --- |

—

award the applicant EUR one (1) by way of compensation for the non-pecuniary damage sustained and the sum of EUR seven thousand three hundred and seventy two (7 372) by way of compensation for the financial damage sustained;

| — | order the defendant to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an official of the Commission, is originally from the island of La Réunion, a French overseas department. He brought the present action following the rejection of a complaint which he had lodged against his payslip for August 2004, containing reimbursement of his annual travelling expenses.

In support of his action, the applicant claims that Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, relating to reimbursement of officials' annual travelling expenses to their place of origin, is unlawful. He contends that that provision is contrary to Community law in that it gives rise to unequal treatment connected with the place of origin of officials and also to discrimination contrary to Articles 12 EC and 299 EC as against officials originating from French overseas departments, and also as regards nationality, the fact of belonging to a language minority, ethnic origin or race.

The applicant also claims that that provision infringes other general principles of Community law, such as the obligation to state reasons and the principles of proportionality, transparency and sound administration, and also the principle of legitimate expectations and legal certainty.

---
#### Beverly NORMAN and Terry Norman, Minor, by James R. Norman, Father and Next Friend v. SIMPSON ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

No. 51032.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 11, 1979.

Holcomb, Dunbar, Connell, Merkel, Tolli-son & Khayat, Charles M. Merkel, Clarks-dale, for appellant.

William L. Rone, Mills E. Barbee, Her-nando, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, DeSoto County; Dick R. Thomas, Judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED ON THE SOLE ISSUE OF DAMAGES.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and SUGG, WALKER, LEE and COFER, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 311 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 311

To prohibit further Federal funding for the gas turbine-modular helium 
              reactor program of the Department of Energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Klug introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit further Federal funding for the gas turbine-modular helium 
              reactor program of the Department of Energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    After September 30, 1995, no further Federal funding shall be 
expended for the gas turbine-modular helium reactor program of the 
Department of Energy.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

|   | 1.  | Viropro’s      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009, and to      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  |
|--------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.  | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Lexicon.                                                                                                                                                  |

| By:   | /s/      Serge Beausoleil                  |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|            | Serge      Beausoleil                      |
|            | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

| By:   | /s/      Claude Gingras                 |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|
|            | Claude      Gingras                     |
|            | Vice      President, Corprorate Affairs |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial  statements for the year ended March 31, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                  1,034
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,034
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     190
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,034
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          489
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           186
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       186
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            6.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                            6.29
        

</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth J. MORGAN, as personal representative of the Estate of Gale C. Morgan, and as surviving widow of Gale C. Morgan, Deceased, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Robert E. LOCKWOOD, Clerk, Circuit Court, Broward County, Florida, the Honorable Thomas J. Reddick, Circuit Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida, Sachi Mallan, M. D., Walter H. Janke, M. D., P. A., a Florida Corporation, Robert Schwinger, M. D., and North Beach Medical Center, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Respondents.

No. 78-2601.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 31, 1979.

Harry G. Carratt of Morgan, Carratt and O’Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Edward N. Winitz of Thornton, Conroy & Herndon, P.A., Miami, for respondents — Sa-chi Malian, M.D. and Walter H. Janke, M.D., P.A.

Robert M. Klein of Stephens, Schwartz, Lynn, Chernay & Brandy, P.A., Miami, for respondent — Robert Schwinger, M.D.

Joseph S. Kashi of Grimmett, Scherer & James, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent — North Beach Medical Center.

DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., Associate Judge.

This is here on a petition for writ of certiorari, petition for writ of mandamus and petition for writ of prohibition. As an aside, apparently petitioner wants to make sure we take jurisdiction by some means in order to grant relief and that is why the many petitions have reached us. We shall take jurisdiction, of the petition for writ of certiorari as has been the rule in reaching down to correct departures from the essential requirements of law in medical mediation matters. *Cole v. Wallace,*354 So.2d 885 (Fla.4th DCA 1977). However we point to *Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure*9.040(c) which says “If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought.”

This case is controlled by and is essentially indistinguishable from our case of *Diggett*v. *Hon. Virgil B. Conkling,*368 So.2d 74, (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) and our ruling here must follow the one in *Diggett.*

The order setting the medical mediation hearing beyond the jurisdictional time limit is quashed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

WRIT OF CERTIORARI GRANTED.

BERANEK and LETTS, JJ., concur.