alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomePollution Status Lists...Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, done at London, Mexico City, Moscow and Washington December 29, 1972

# 									Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, done at London, Mexico City, Moscow and Washington December 29, 1972							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force August 30, 1975.

In accordance with Article XVII, the Convention shall be subject to ratification; instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Governments of Mexico, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. In accordance with Article XVIII, the Convention shall be open for accession by any State after December 31, 1973; instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of Mexico, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. In accordance with Article XIX, the Convention entered into force on the thirtieth day following the date of deposit of the fifteenth instrument of ratification or accession. For each Contracting Party ratifying or acceding to the Convention after the deposit of the fifteenth instrument of ratification or accession, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the deposit by such Party of its instrument of ratification or accession.
Download Status List						 [574 KB]

Tags

MultilateralPollutionTreaties

Back to Top
§ 589.214 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *U.S. intelligence activities.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to activities subject to the reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 *et seq.*), or any authorized intelligence activities of the United States.
( c ) *Activities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to activities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), including the supply by any entity of the Russian Federation of any product or service, or the procurement of such product or service by any contractor or subcontractor of the United States or any other entity, relating to or in connection with any space launch conducted for NASA or any other non-Department of Defense customer.
( d ) *Importation of goods.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to the importation of any goods that would otherwise be prohibited solely because of the interest of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked solely pursuant to § 589.201(a)(6)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v). For the purposes of this paragraph (d), the term “good(s)” means any article, natural or manmade substance, material, supply or manufactured product, including inspection and test equipment, and excluding technical data.
( e ) *Official business.* The prohibitions contained in §§ 589.201(a)(5), 589.206, 589.207, and 589.208 do not apply to transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
Note 1 to paragraph ( e
):
*See* § 589.510 for a general license authorizing transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government not otherwise exempt.
#### Edyth FLEISCHER, Appellant, v. Lee BONNER, Appellee.

No. 80-783.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 16, 1981.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1981.

Curtis L. Witters of Glickman & Witters, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, and Johnson & Bakst, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is affirmed.

The Appellee’s motion for attorneys fees under the subject contract is hereby granted and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of determining a reasonable amount to be awarded to Appellee’s counsel on appeal. However, any proceedings relative to attorneys fees shall not delay the complete fulfillment of the final *1060judgment hereby affirmed which fulfillment shall take place no later than thirty (30) days from the date hereof.

Any petition for rehearing shall be physically filed in this courthouse within two (2) days from the date hereof *strictly*in accordance with the provisions of Florida Appellate Rule 9.330.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

*Name of Agency:*                     Postal Regulatory Commission.                

*Time and Date:*                     Monday, September 14, 2009, at 3 p.m.                

*Place:*                     Commission conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*                     1. Consideration and adoption of FY 2011 budget. (2) Election of vice-chairman.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001, 202-789-6820 and                     *stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.*

Dated: August 31, 2009.

Judith M. Grady,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-21304 Filed 8-31-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
# C_2005251EN.01001701.xml

| 11.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3937 — CVC/Minit Group)

(2005/C 251/26)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3937. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3937. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Manfred LUDEMANN, Appellant, v. Ursel LUDEMANN, Appellee.

No. 73-1309.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeLiberia

# Liberia

71 items

        -    		Richard  Dunning	  June 22, 1951 

previous page1…678

Back to Top
§ 3.542 The record. ( a ) The hearing must be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the ALJ. A party that requests a transcript of hearing proceedings must pay the cost of preparing the transcript unless, for good cause shown by the party, the payment is waived by the ALJ or the Board, as appropriate.
( b ) The transcript of the testimony, exhibits, and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for decision by the ALJ and the Secretary.
( c ) The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by any person, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown, which may include the presence in the record of identifiable patient safety work product.
( d ) For good cause, which may include the presence in the record of identifiable patient safety work product, the ALJ may order appropriate redactions made to the record.
From: Sandra_V_Silva@fws.gov

Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 2:38 PM

To: Tim_Allen@fws.gov; Bruce_Polkowsky@nps.gov; John_Bunyak@nps.gov; Dean_Gillam@fws.gov; 

Andrea_Stacy@nps.gov; Holly_Salazer@nps.gov; Don_Shepherd@nps.gov; csams@fs.fed.us; aacheson@fs.fed.us; 

copeland@cira.colostate.edu; jeepps@state.pa.us; Wentworth.Ellen%epamail@fws.gov; Mahinske, Jane; 

dca80123@yahoo.com

Subject: FLM / State of Pennsylvania Conference Call regarding Draft Regional Haze SIP

Hi Jane. Thank you for agreeing to talk to us about your draft Regional Haze SIP. It looks as though Wednesday, May 14th, at 1:30 

eastern time (11:30 mountain time) will accommodate most of us. I've attached a file containing our discussion points for the call. 

Below, you'll find the call in information. Please call me if you have any questions. 

Thanks so much. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIAL-IN NUMBERS

CALL IN NUMBER: 800-369-1125

Sandra V. Silva

Chief, FWS Air Quality Branch

sandra_v_silva@fws.gov

(303) 914-3801

CALL TIME: 11:30 AM MOUNTAIN TIME, 1:30 

EASTERN TIME

CALL DATE: MAY-14-2008 (Wednesday)

DURATION: 2 hr 

CALL LEADER: SANDRA SILVA

PARTICIPANT PASSCODE: 49382

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Program Files\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\3378445600550980171\E... 1/12/2012
# C_2005329EN.01001401.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/14

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG INFSO — MEDIA 12/2005

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

MEDIA PLUS

MEDIA PLUS

Support for the transnational distribution of European films and the networking of distributors — the ‘selective’ scheme

(2005/C 329/10)

1.   Objectives and description

This call for proposals is based on Council Decision 2000/821/EC on the implementation of a programme encouraging the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (Media Plus — Development, distribution and promotion 2001 — 2005), adopted by the Council on 20 December 2000 and published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 17 January 2001 (OJ L 13, pages 34-43). The proposal to prolong the MEDIA Programme until 31 December 2006 was approved by the Council of Ministers on 26 April 2004.

Official Journal of the European Communities

The measures covered by the Decision include support for the transnational distribution of European cinema films.

2.   Eligible applicants

This notice is addressed to European distribution companies whose activities contribute to the attainment of the above objectives.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 25 countries of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 25 countries of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA countries,

| — | the candidate country for EU membership: Bulgaria. |
| --- | --- |

—

the candidate country for EU membership: Bulgaria.

3.   Budget and duration of projects

The total budget available for this Call for Proposals amounts to EUR 12 million.

The financial assistance from the Commission may in no case exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs.

The theatrical release may not start before the deadline of the Call for Proposals and must have started 18 months after this date at the latest.

The maximum duration of the projects is 12 months.

4.   Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be submitted to the Commission by no later than 1 April 2006, 7 July 2006 and 1 December 2006.

1 April 2006, 7 July 2006

1 December 2006

5.   Full details

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the application forms, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/distr_en.html.

Applications must comply with all the terms of the guidelines and be submitted on the forms provided.

---
#### § 137.168 May the Secretary require audit or accounting standards other than those specified in § 137.167?

No, no other audit or accounting standards shall be required by the Secretary.
§ 588.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *United Nations Participation Act.* The exemptions cited in this section do not apply to transactions involving property or interests in property of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c(b)) (UNPA). Note 1 to paragraph ( a
).
Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the UNPA include those listed on *both* OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and the Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List (*see https://www.un.org ).*
( b ) *International Emergency Economic Powers Act.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions that are exempt pursuant to section 203(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)).
( c ) *Official business.* The prohibitions contained in § 588.201(a)(3) do not apply to any transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
#### § 412.200 General provisions.

Beginning with discharges occurring on or after October 1, 1987, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules governing the prospective payment system for inpatient operating costs. Except as provided in this subpart, the provisions of subparts A, B, C, F, G, and H of this part apply to hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except for § 412.60, which deals with DRG classification and weighting factors, or as otherwise specified, the provisions of subparts D and E, which describe the methodology used to determine prospective payment rates for inpatient operating costs for hospitals, do not apply to hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Instead, the methodology for determining prospective payment rates for inpatient operating costs for these hospitals is set forth in §§ 412.204 through 412.212.

[83 FR 41704, Aug. 17 2018]
#### Anthony J. BASCONE and Rose M. Bascone, Appellants, v. FIREMAN’S FUND AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Prather’s Inc., Appellees.

No. 74-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 24, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 405.2414 Nurse practitioner, physician assistant, and certified nurse midwife services. ( a ) Professional services are payable under this subpart if the services meet all of the following: ( 1 ) Furnished by a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or certified nurse midwife who is employed by, or receives compensation from, the RHC or FQHC.
( 2 ) Furnished under the medical supervision of a physician.
( 3 ) Furnished in accordance with any medical orders for the care and treatment of a patient prepared by a physician.
( 4 ) Are of a type which the nurse practitioner, physician assistant or certified nurse midwife who furnished the service is legally permitted to perform by the State in which the service is rendered.
( 5 ) The services would be covered if furnished by a physician.
( b ) The physician supervision requirement is met if the conditions specified in § 491.8(b) of this chapter and any pertinent requirements of State law are satisfied.
( c ) The services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants or certified nurse midwives are not covered if State law or regulations require that the services be performed under a physician's order and no such order was prepared.
[43 FR 8261, Mar. 1, 1978, as amended at 79 FR 25475, May 2, 2014]
§ 405.2402 Rural health clinic basic requirements. ( a ) *Certification by the State survey agency.* The rural health clinic must be certified in accordance with part 491 of this chapter.
( b ) *Acceptance of the clinic as qualified to furnish RHC services.* If the Secretary, after reviewing the survey agency or accrediting organization recommendation, as applicable, and other evidence relating to the qualifications of the clinic, determines that the clinic meets the requirements of this subpart and of part 491 of this chapter, the clinic is provided with— ( 1 ) Written notice of the determination; and
( 2 ) Two copies of the agreement to be filed as required by section 1861(aa)(1) of the Act.
( c ) *Filing of agreement by the clinic.* If the clinic wishes to participate in the program, it must— ( 1 ) Have both copies of the agreement signed by an authorized representative; and
( 2 ) File them with the Secretary.
( d ) *Acceptance by the Secretary.* If the Secretary accepts the agreement filed by the clinic, the Secretary returns to the clinic one copy of the agreement with a notice of acceptance specifying the effective date.
( e ) *Appeal rights.* If CMS declines to enter into an agreement or if CMS terminates an agreement, the clinic is entitled to a hearing in accordance with § 498.3(b)(5) and (6) of this chapter.
[43 FR 8261, Mar. 1, 1978, as amended at 52 FR 22454, June 12, 1987; 79 FR 25474, May 2, 2014]
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Stephane Allard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Biovest International, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.



c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



|Dated: January 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: /s/ Stephane Allard
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  |  | Stephane Allard        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      4,420,714
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     17,552,018
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                49,416,738
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                   756,595,253
<ALLOWANCE>                                 4,640,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            859,961,768
<DEPOSITS>                                555,766,519
<SHORT-TERM>                               64,000,378
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        14,463,167
<LONG-TERM>                               159,460,296
<COMMON>                                   48,460,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 17,810,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            859,961,768
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            14,699,198
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             828,007
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              351,769
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           15,878,974
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          6,180,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9,413,132
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       6,465,842
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             3,865,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,138,181
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  4,138,181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,801,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                 1,383,882
<LOANS-PAST>                                   40,703
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                25,636
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            4,540,307
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  16,973
<RECOVERIES>                                   27,009
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           4,640,343
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        4,259,271
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       381,072
        

</TABLE>