alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 405.966 Evidence to be submitted with the reconsideration request. ( a ) *Evidence submitted with the request.* When filing a request for reconsideration, a party should present evidence and allegations of fact or law related to the issue in dispute and explain why it disagrees with the initial determination, including the redetermination. ( 1 ) This evidence must include any missing documentation identified in the notice of redetermination, consistent with § 405.956(b)(6).
( 2 ) Absent good cause, failure to submit all evidence, including documentation requested in the notice of redetermination prior to the issuance of the notice of reconsideration precludes subsequent consideration of that evidence.
( b ) *Evidence submitted after the request.* Each time a party submits additional evidence after filing the request for reconsideration, the QIC's 60 calendar day decisionmaking timeframe is automatically extended by up to 14 calendar days for each submission. This extension does not apply to timely submissions of documentation specifically requested by a QIC, unless the documentation was originally requested in the notice of redetermination.
( c ) *Exception for beneficiaries and State Medicaid Agencies that file reconsideration requests.* ( 1 ) Beneficiaries and State Medicaid Agencies that file requests for reconsideration are not required to comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. However, the automatic 14 calendar day extension described in paragraph (b) of this section applies to each evidence submission made after the request for reconsideration is filed.
( 2 ) Beneficiaries who are represented by providers or suppliers must comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65334, Dec. 9, 2009]
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Description of docketed model input data used in th e Ozone NAAQS proposal RIA

(human health benefits calculations) completed usin g the BenMAP-CE as part of the Ozone NAAQS review

Date: February 2, 2015

EPA has placed into the docket (docket number EPA-H Q-OAR-2013-0169) a CD containing the input files used in generating human health-related benefits estimates for ozone as part of the regulatory impact analysis (RIA) completed for the current Ozone NAAQS review (excluding those data inputs included as part of the default B enMAP model). 1 The files on the CD include inputs to the BenMAP model (BenMAP-CE version 1.0.8 ) used to generate both health
incidence estimates and associated dollar benefits. The specific files docketed on the CD include:

a) Air quality input data used in deriving air quality surfaces : Included are the .csv air quality files used to generate the air grids used i n the BenMAP RIA runs for ozone. In creating air quality grids using these csv files, w e imported them as “model data” using the CMAQ 12km Nation coverage included in BenMAP. N ote that the “...MDA1” .csv files contain the 1hr max values used in the long-t erm mortality simulations, while the “...MDA8” .csv files contain the 8hr max values used in modeling short-term exposure endpoints. b) BenMAP configuration files used in generating healt h incidence estimates (CFG) : These configuration files include both health impact func tions as well as other model settings/choices (e.g., demographic and baseline in cidence years, deterministic versus probabilistic simulation modes) used in generating basic incidence estimates. We have included CFG files used in generating: (a) short-te rm exposure-related estimates (Ozone_RIA_Core_8hrmax_2025_may-sept), (b) long-ter m mortality estimates excluding consideration of potential thresholds (Ozone_RIA_Core_1hrmax_LTnothresh_2025) and (c) lon g-term mortality estimates including consideration for the range of thresholds discussed in the RIA (Ozone_RIA_Core_1hrmax_LTthresh_2025). c) BenMAP configuration files used in generating aggre gated and pooled incidence estimates as well as associated dollar-based benefi ts estimates : The APV configuration files include the aggregation and pooling structure s as well as the valuation functions used to translate health impact incidence estimates (deltas) into associated dollar benefit estimates. Specific APV files include: (a) APV file s for short-term exposure-related estimates (Ozone_RIA_Core_8hrmax_2025_may-sept) and (b) APV files for long-term mortality estimates (Ozone_RIA_Core_1hrmax_LT_morta lity_2025_75-70p).

1 For example, we used pre-packaged baseline inciden ce and prevalence rates as well as demographic data included in the public-release BenMAP-CE model in completing our benefits estimates and consequently, those dat a inputs are not included in this docketing action.Point of contact: Zachary Pekar, U.S. EPA, Office o f Air Quality Planning and Standards, email:

pekar.zachary@epa.gov)
No. 74-1317.

#### Laidlaw Corp. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 507 F. 2d 1381.
Abatement Order f iled January 5 , 2023.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00387

- CV

IN RE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 189th Distric t Court Harris County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 2021

- 33529



### ABATE MENT O RDER

On May 27, 2022 , relator Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County,
Texas filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’ t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petitio n, rel at or asks this Court to compel the Ho norable Scot Dollinger, presiding judge of the 189th District
Court of Harris County
, to vacate the trial court ’ s May 16, 2022, “Order Denying2

METR O ’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Execute Medical/Medicare/Insuran ce Aut ho rizations and Respond to Interrogat ories Nos. 9 and 12.”
Because Judge Dollinger ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 189 th District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus proceeding to permit the respondent’s succ ess or, t he Honorable Tamika Craft , to consider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland , 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue aga ins t a ne w judge for what a former one did.”).
Therefore, we abate this proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and remove it from the court’s active docket. This original proceeding is abated until February
6 , 202 3 to permit Judge Craft to consider th e ord er u nderlying relator’s request for relief. On or before that date, Judge Craft shall advise th is C ourt of the action
taken on relator ’ s request by filing a signed order reflecting her ruling concerning
relator ’ s request for relief with this court. Th is C o ur t will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss the original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Pane l c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
# Russia

1815 items

        -    Report  		Russia	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Russia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    		CAATSA/CRIEEA Section 232 Public Guidance	  October 31, 2017 
        -    		CAATSA/CRIEEA Section 225 Public Guidance	  October 31, 2017 
        -    Report  		Russia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Russia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Russia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Evgeniy Mikhailovich Bogachev	  April 9, 2017 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Konstantin Lopatin	  April 9, 2017 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Roman Olegovich Zolotarev	  April 9, 2017 

previous page1…174175176177178…182next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.416 Determination of competitive bidding payment amounts. ( a ) *General rule.* CMS establishes a single payment amount for each item furnished under a competitive bidding program.
( b ) *Methodology for setting payment amount.* ( 1 ) The single payment amount for a lead item furnished under a competitive bidding program is equal to the maximum bid submitted for that item by suppliers whose composite bids for the product category that includes the item are equal to or below the pivotal bid for that product category.
( 2 ) The single payment amount for a lead item must be less than or equal to the amount that would otherwise be paid for the same item under subpart C or subpart D of this part.
( 3 ) The single payment amount for an item in a product category furnished under a competitive bidding program that is not a lead item for that product category is equal to the single payment amount for the lead item in the same product category multiplied by the ratio of the average of the 2015 fee schedule amounts for all areas (that is, all states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands), for the item to the average of the 2015 fee schedule amounts for all areas for the lead item.
[72 FR 18085, Apr. 10, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 77967, Nov. 4, 2016; 83 FR 57072, Nov. 14, 2018]
#### Bennie ST. ROUMAIN STOUT v. Percy J. BUECHE & Madeline Brashear Bueche.

No. 80-C-2863.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Bennie St. Roumain Stout, applying for remedial writs, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 13663.

Denied.

MARCUS, DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 72144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twelfth RTCA SC-228 Minimum Performance Standards (MPS) for UAS 
Focused-Topic Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Twelfth RTCA SC-228 Minimum Performance Standards (MPS) for UAS 
Focused-Topic Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Twelfth RTCA SC-228 Minimum Performance Standards (MPS) for 
UAS Focused-Topic Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held virtually November 14, 2016, 12:30 
p.m.-01:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Virtual meeting ONLY. Join at 
the following link: https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m0be5cd6a8d8d86fc024338aca4569302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Secen at asecen@rtca.org or 202-
330-0647, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Twelfth RTCA SC-228 Minimum 
Performance Standards (MPS) for UAS Focused-Topic Plenary. The agenda 
will include the following:

Monday, November 14, 2016, 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.

1. Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks/SC-228 Participation 
Guidelines
    a. Reading of the Public Announcement by the DFO
    b. Reading of the RTCA Proprietary References Policy
2. Agenda Overview
3. Determine approval of WG-1 DAA MOPS
    a. DAA MOPS Document Approval
    b. Air-to-Air Radar MOPS Document Approval
4. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public. With the approval of 
the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the 
meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information 
should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 13, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-25187 Filed 10-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO v. Richard Winston POWELL.

No. 67362.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Richard Winston Powell, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Winn. No. 1110.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Billy STOKES v. Warden Roger AUCOIN.

No. 65498.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Billy Stokes, applying for writ of habeas corpus. E. Baton Rouge Parish. Number unknown.

Denied.
#### David B. STAUFFACHER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 48035.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 19, 1974.

Grover C. Coleman, A. K. Edwards, Men-denhall, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

SMITH, Justice:

David B. Stauffacher was indicted for burglary. He was tried upon that charge in the Circuit Court of Simpson County. He was convicted and sentenced to serve a term of five years in the penitentiary.

From that conviction and sentence an appeal to this Court was perfected. However, during the pendency of the appeal, Stauf-facher escaped from confinement and is presently a fugitive from justice. Under these circumstances, the appeal is finally dismissed, subject to reinstatement only upon good cause being shown therefor.

Appeal dismissed.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER and ROBERTSON, JJ, concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11


                            GRAPHIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
 
                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
                                        ----------------------------
 
                                              1997         1996
                                           -----------  -----------
 
Net income (loss)                          $ 3,953,064  $(2,409,049)
 
Add interest on 7% convertible
 subordinated debentures(2)                    205,307      218,264
                                           -----------  -----------
 
    TOTAL                                  $ 4,158,371  $(2,190,785)
                                           ===========  ===========
 
Shares (1)
 Primary
  Weighted average shares
   outstanding                              11,792,343   11,545,409
 Fully Diluted
  Add common shares applicable
   to assumed conversion of 7%
   convertible subordinated
   debentures                                1,203,262    1,279,200
                                           -----------  -----------
  Weighted average shares
   outstanding, as adjusted                 12,995,605   12,824,609
                                           ===========  ===========
 
Primary earnings (loss) per share          $       .34  $      (.21)
                                           ===========  ===========
 
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share    $       .32  $      (.21)(3)
                                           ===========  ===========


(1)  No significant dilutive common stock equivalents were outstanding in any
     year.
(2)  Net of income tax effect.
(3)  Fully diluted earnings per share, as computed, were not dilutive and
     therefore, equal primary earnings per share.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese President Ali Bongo Ondimba

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese President Ali Bongo Ondimba							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 6, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Gabonese President Ali Bongo Ondimba today in Libreville. Deputy Secretary Sherman and President Bongo Ondimba had a productive conversation on potential new avenues for deepening our strong relations. They discussed environmental protection and climate resilience, Congo Basin conservation efforts, and public health initiatives on COVID-19. They expressed their support for the people of Ukraine and the principles enshrined in the United Nations and African Union Charters, currently threatened by Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. They also discussed the shared commitment to security cooperation and regional security priorities.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateGabonOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Michael D. Becker,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based upon
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      /s/ Michael D. Becker
                                      ------------------------------------------
Dated:   November 14, 2005            Michael D. Becker, President
                                      and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2006060EN.01000902.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-69/05: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - State aid in the agricultural sector - Submission of annual reports during 2000 and 2001 - Guidelines for the assessment of State aid)

(2006/C 60/18)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-69/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and A. Stobiecka-Kuik) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) — action under Article 226 EEC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 11 February 2005 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, G. Arestis (Rapporteur) and J. Klučka, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to communicate, before 1 July 2001 and no later than 30 June 2002, annual reports on all State aid schemes in the agricultural sector existing during 2000 and 2001, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 88(1) EC and Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article [88 EC], as implemented by the Commission communication entitled ‘Community Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector’, published in the Official Journal of the European Communities of 1 February 2000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to communicate, before 1 July 2001 and no later than 30 June 2002, annual reports on all State aid schemes in the agricultural sector existing during 2000 and 2001, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 88(1) EC and Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article [88 EC], as implemented by the Commission communication entitled ‘Community Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector’, published in the Official Journal of the European Communities of 1 February 2000;

Official Journal of the European Communities

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2005.

1

---
PUBLIC LAW 114–175—JUNE 13, 2016 130 STAT. 429 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3866: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Apr. 18, considered and passed House. 

May 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–175 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1265 Hurffville 

Road in Deptford Township, New Jersey, as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore 

S. Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT SALVATORE S. CORMA II POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located 1265 Hurffville Road in Deptford Township, New 

Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘First Lieutenant 

Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘First Lieutenant Salvatore S. Corma II Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 13, 2016. 

June 13, 2016 

[H.R. 3866] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
```

[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]               
[Page 32536]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-169]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 3, 2010, the FAA published a notice of a meeting of 
the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. 
The notice contained an inaccurate date in one section. This notice 
corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerri Robinson, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-9678; fax (202) 267-5057; e-mail 
Gerri.Robinson@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2010-13326, published June 3, 
2010, (75 FR 31509) make the following correction:
    On page 31509, in the second column, under the heading 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, revise the date ``December 9, 2009'' to read 
``June 16, 2010.''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 3, 2010.
Pamela A. Hamilton-Powell,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-13762 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```