·J **..n**

r
•

, ') :.J " T A 'rT ()'· MIS

- f URI

J erem

i ah W. Qa y) N :Xo n, C -o-.. e mor

• M:uk
N

. T e m p:cro
n , D

. ireao

r DEPARTM

' ENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OCT
3 0 2009 Mr

. Will

i am W

. Rice Acting Regional Administrator U

. S. EPA

, Region VII 901 North Fifth Street Kansas City, KS 66101 Dear Mr. Rice:

www.dnr.m

o .gov REC'D NOV 06 2009 A PCO The Missouri Air Conservation Commission
has recently revised

or promulgated

the following regulation(s)

for the Missouri State Implementation
Plan (SIP). The following is enclosed
for your review: 10 CSR 10-6.120 Restriction

of Lead from Specific Lead Smelter-Refinery Installations This rule amendment updates the existing Doe Run Buick Resource Recycling facility rule to reflect throughput
and emiss

i ons limit

a tions contained

in the November 2007 revised Prevention

of Significant Deterioration permit and addresses changes

to the facility's processes

. The commission adopted the enclosed rule action(s)
on April30, 2009, after considering comments received

at public hearing. The commission
has full legal authority

to develop rules pursuant

to Section 643.050
of the Missouri Air Conservation Law. The state followed

all applicable administrative procedures

in proposing and adopting the rule action(s)

. Enclosed
are the required SIP submittal elements
for determination

of plan completeness

per 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix

V. The Mis

s ouri Department

of Natural Resources requests that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency amend the SIP to replac

e the current rule(s)
in th e SIP. Thank you for your attention

to this matter

. If you ha v e any questions regarding this 0 RK" y ded Pa perMr.WilliamW.RicePageTwosubmittal,pleasecontactWayneGraf,withtheDepartment'sAirPollutionControlProgramatP.O.Box176,JeffersonCity,MO65102orbyphoneat(573)751-4817.Sincerely,JLK:khsEnclosures:CopyofrulepublishedinCSRCopyofcommissionsignaturepagecertifyingMissouriAirConservationCommissionadoptionCopyoftechnicalsupportdocumentationforrule(ifapplicable)CopiesofpublichearingnewspapernoticesCopyofpublichearingtranscriptintroductorystatementCopyofMORegorderofrulemakingwithcomments/responsesc:MissouriAirConservationCommissionA ugu st 3
, 2009 Vol. 34 N o. 15 Missouri Registe

r

Page 1691 tie 10--DEPARI'MENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10-Air Conservation Commission C pter 6-Air Quality Standards, Def'mitions, Sampr and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State of Missouri ORDER OF RULEMAKING authority vested

in the Missouri Air Conserv tion ion under section 643.050, RSMo 2000, the comm· sion rule as follows: 10 CSR 10-6.045

is amended

. roposed rulemaking containing
the text of th proposed amendment published

in the Missouri Register
on brwuy

3, 2009 (34 Mo

g 205-206). Those sections with change are reprinted here. This

p posed amendment becomes effective

rty (30) days after publicatio

in the Code of State Regulations. SUMMARY

OF COMMENTS:

The Missouri Department

of Natural Resources
Air Pollution Control Prog received five (5) comments from th (3) sources
on this arne ent: Associated General Contracto

of Missouri,
Inc ., issouri Limestone Producers Associati

, and the U

. S
. Env· omental Protection Agency (EPA).

t the department provide

a tech

nical demonstration outlining the ifference between this rule, which is an amendment

to a consolida

o of four

( 4) separate rules, and the original rules approved

in th Mi ouri State Implementation
Plan (SIP) showing that this ru1 is stringent

as the original SIP approved version and that

re are
n net air quality disbenefits

as a result of the revision. EPA serves
th opportunity

to comment
fur

ther on this proposed ndment fall ing receipt
of this support documentation

. RESPONSE

: The

d provide

a technical

de onstration

to EPA ben the amended rule is submitted
for inclusi

n in the state implem ntation plan. No word

ing changes have

n made
to the propos amendment

as a result of this comment. COMMENT

#4: In section (3) General Provis proposed

ch did not address petroleum

- ed products. EPA requests that department provide
an explana
on for why petrole

um-based

p ucts are not included

in the descn ·on and an analysis of any

r quality impacts
of the revisions petroleum-based products

a not included under the definition

of wastes. RESPON AND EXPLANATION

OF CH

E: Petroleumbased

p ucts
is in the current rule and was inadv ntly removed as
a res

t of changing

a sentence. The department

Air Pollution Control Program has no concerns about restoring

p leum-based produ

in the rule

. Section (3) is amended

by retai

· petroleumbased roducts under the general provisions heading. NT #5: In paragraph (3)(A)l0

. , the departme certain trade wastes may be permitted

. EPA sugges that the d artment remove the term certain and instead list the spec
tc trade st.es that would be exempt from the open burning

p ibition hould the entity be able to show that

a situation exists whe urning

is in the best interest
of the
g eneral public,
or when
it

uct, cause, permit,
or ducts, trade waste, · on waste,
or permitted Title 10-DEPARI'MENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10-Air Conservation Commission Chapter 6-Air Quality Standards, Def'mitions, Sampling and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State of Missouri ORDER OF RULEMAKING By the authority vested

in the Missouri Air Conservation Commission under section 643.050, RSMo 2000, the commission amends

a rule as follows

: 10 CSR 10-6.120

is amended

. A notice of proposed rulemaking containing
the text of the proposed amendment
was published

in the Missouri Register
on Febrwuy

3, 2009 (34 MoReg 206-208)

. Those sections with changes are reprint

ed here. This proposed amendment becomes effective thirty (30) days after publication

in the Code of State Regulations. SUMMARY

OF COMMENTS

: The Missouri Department

of Natural Resources'
Air Pollution Control Program received four (4) comments from one (l) source: the U

. S
. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

. COMMENT

#1: EPA commented
that an air quality analysis, includ

ing any appropriate modeling results,

is necessary

to show that the conditions contained

in the rule are sufficient

to provide for attainment of the 1.5 p.g/m

3 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for lead

. EPA recommended

that the analysis address
all of the applicable completeness requirements contained

in 40 CPR part 51, Appendix

V
, Section

2

. 2 Technical Support. RESPONSE:
The department's

Air Pollution Control Program will provide EPA with an air quality analysis when the rule is submitted to EPA
to replace the current rule in the Missouri State Implementation
Plan (SIP). No wording changes have been made to the proposed amendment

as a result of this comment. COMMENT

#2: EPA noted that the amendment changes the emissions limit for the main stack and removes
all throughput process limits

. The Prevention

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit for the Doe Run Company's Buick facility contains

a total lead production limit of one hundred seventy-five thousaiKl (175,000) tons per year

. This limit
is not contained

in the rule amendment.
The limits in the SIP and in the PSD permit should be similar. Future permit changes that could impact attainment and maintenance

of the NAAQS
for lead would also need to be reflected

in the SIP. RESPONS

E AND EXPLANATION

OF C HANGE:

As
a result ofPage1692OrdersofRulemakingAugust3,2009Vol.34No.15thiscomment,paragraph(3)(B)2.hasbeenamendedtoincorporatetheadditionoftheleadproductionlimitcontainedinthecurrentPSDpermit.COMMENT#3:EPAnotesthattherulemakesseveralreferencesto40CFRpart63,subpartX,whichisnotpartofMissouri'sSIPfortheDoeRunResourceRecyclingDivision.Sincethestaterule10CSR10-6.075,whichincludes40CFRpart63,subpartX,isnotapprovedintotheMissouriSIP,thereferencetoitshouldberemovedfromsubsection(5)(E)of10CSR10-6.120.RESPONSEANDEXPLANATIONOFCHANGE:Asaresultofthiscomment,subsection(5)(E)hasbeenamendedtoincorporatethissuggestion.COMMENT#4:EPAproposedrevisingsubsection(4)(C)toincludeareferencetotheemissionslimitationsdescribedinsubsection(3)(B).RESPONSEANDEXPLANATIONOFCHANGE:Asaresultofthiscomment,subsection(4)(C)hasbeenamendedtoincludethesuggestedlanguage.10CSR10-6.120RestrictionofEmissionsofLeadFromSpecificLeadSmelter-RefineryInstallations(3)GeneralProvisions.(B)ProvisionsPertainingtoLimitationsofLeadEmissionsfromSpecificInstallations.1.DoeRunprimaryleadsmelter-refmeryinHerculaneum,Missouri.ThisinstallationshalllimitleademissionsintotheatmospheretotheallowableamountasshowninThbleI.StackNameMainStackNumber7&9BaghouseStack'DibleIEmissionsLimitation(lbsper24hours)794.0Number8BaghouseStack56.68.22.DoeRunResourceRecyclingDivisioninBoss,Missouri,shalllimitmainstackleademissionsintotheatmosphereto0.00087grainsofleadperdrystandardcubicfeetofair.Thisinstallationshalllimittotalleadproductiontoonehundredseventy-fivethousand(l75,000)tonsperyear.(4)ReportingandRecordKeeping.(C)TheDoeRunResourceRecyclingDivision,Boss,Missouri,operatorshallkeeprecordsthatdemonstratecompliancewiththeemissionslimitationsdescribedinsubsection(3)(B)usingthesamplingmethodsdescribedinsubsection(5)(E)ofthisrule.Theserecordsshallbemaintainedon-siteinaccordancewithrecordkeepingandreportingrequirementsinsubsection(5)(E)ofthisrule.(5)TestMethods.(E)ThemethodsfordemonstratingcomplianceattheDoeRunResourceRecyclingDivisioninBoss,Missouri,shallbethosespecifiedin40CFRpart63,subpartX.BytheauthorityvestedintheMissouriAirConservationommissionundersection643.050,RSMo2000,thecommissionendsaruleasfollows:10CSR10-6.260isamended.AnticeofproposedrulemakingcontainingthetextofthepropsedarnentwaspublishedintheMissouriRegisteronFebrua3,20094MoReg208-211).Thosesectionswithchangesarereriotedhe.Thisproposedamendmentbecomeseffectivethir(30)daysapublication intheCodeofStateRegulations.SUMMYOFCOMMENTS:TheMissouriDeparNaturalReurces'AirPollutionControlProgramreceive(16)conunetsfromtwo(2)sources:theDoeRunCompU.S.EnviroentalProtectionAgency(EPA).COMMENT#·DoeRunrequestedthedepartmentnmoveforwardtopromultetheruleasproposed,butrathereetwiththecompanytoreach:analternateproposal.RESPONSEEXPLANATIONOFCHANGE:eproposedrulewasdevelopthroughaworkgroupprocss.TheflrstReasonableAvailabControlTechnology(RACTmeetingswithstakeholders,includiDoeRun,beganinAugustf2007andcontinuedperiodicallythughoutthenextsix(6)mos.SeveralmeetingsandconferenceshavebeenheldwithDRunsincetodiscussviableRACToptisandfeasiblealternaves.AsaresultofDoeRun'scomment,entmeetingsbetweDoeRunandthedepartment'sAirPollutioControlProgramereheldtodiscussaphasedapproachtoreducisulfuremissionssuitinginchangestotherule.COMMENT112:DoeRuncotheCleanAirAct(CAA)providesfortheimplementatioofallsonablyAvailableControlMeasures(RACM)asexpeditioslyasracticable.ThefiscalnoteattachedtotheproposedruleacompliancedeadlineofDecember10,2010,butnosucheineisfoundintheproposedrulelanguage.DoeRunquestionehetherthelimitsproposedinthisrulewouldbecomeapplicabledaytheruletakeseffect.DoeRuncommentedthatitisnottee1lyorreasonablyfeasibleforDoeRuntocomplywiththispsedlebyDecember10,2010,anditwouldbeevenmoreunreonabltorequireimmediatecompliancebytheproposedrule'sectived .DoeRunestimatedthatthetimerequiredforengineer·andconsctionofcontrolsystemsnecessarytomeettheproposelimitstobetherangeofthirty(30)months.RESPONSEANDEXPLAATIONOFGE:ToaddresstheCAN.simplementationofcrasexpeditiouyaspracticablethedepartment'sAirPollutioControlProgramandoeRunhavenegotiatedaschedulethatut'izesatieredapproachchtherequiredRACTreductionlimitsThecompliancedates,alowiththecorrespondingemission1''rationsandcomplianceethod,shallbeincludedintheordofrulemaking.Asaresultothiscomment,paragraph(3)(D)l.sbeenchanged.COMMENT#3·DoeRuncommentedthattherealistimeframethatthecontrolwouldbeinplaceattheHerculaneumilitymaketheemissionsimitintheproposedruleevenmoreasonable.TheLeadNtiona!AmbientAirQualityStandard(NS)promulgatedEPAinthefallof2008tightenedtheexistingeadstandardtenfofrom1.5to0.15microgramspercubicmeterug/m3).Thisnestandardmustbeattainedby2016.DoeRunregnizedthatthnewstandardlikelycannotbeattainedusingtheistingsmelt'technologyattheplant.DoeRunhasbeenevaluatingethodsfmeetingthenewstandard,includingtheconstructionofapitemployinganewinnovativeprocessbeingdevelopedthepany.ExistinginformationshowsthatthisnewtechnoloillOrder
of Rulemaking Pursuant

to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri
Air Conservation Commission

has determined that this action

is needed

to have

a U .S. Environmental Protection Agency approved State Implementation
Plan. 10 CSR 10-6.120 (amendment) Restriction

of Emissions

of Lead Frorn Specific Lead Smelter-Refinery Installations

is hereby AMENDED

by the Missouri
Air

· Conservation Commission
this 30th day of April, 2009. **__,_J-==-fM-1~-).,_**

**_ --t~-~-~~~~::=::===--·** 
Chairman J

_ ...,

i /· y

/'

/ ,, ...... **l_.~**

. **...,...·:.."--'"""**

**·" =<"'"'** 
**~- ...._**  ... _____

.. .-_,),_

·

· .• ...... **~** :;......,• **y~!L...; """'**  **(_.:.** _____

, Vice-Chairman < /:il

. **~-h~ _:Y_lf:~U--~-** 

**-·** _/ ...... ·
**·- -~-~~-** 
**"--** _____ ,Member ----------------------------'

Member -----------------------------'

Member ------------------------------•

Member10CSR1o.&-IJEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESchmethodtoestimateemissionsinthesubmsionofanEIQ.ThedepartmentwillapordenyrequestsbyDecember31if"ttedinwritingbySeptember1.EmissionverifiCation.Thedirectorresetheauthoritytoreviewandapproveallemis·nestimationmethodsusedtocalculate"ssionsforthepurposeoffilinganEIQforaccy,reliabilityandappropriateness.Inappriateusageofanemissionfactororme!hohallinclude,butisnotlimitedto:usemissionfactorsnotrepresentativeprocess,usingequipmentinamannerother"thatforwhichitwasdesignedforincillatingemissions,orusingalessaccuraemissionestimationmethodforaprocesswhenafacilityhasmoreaccurateemissionavailable.Additionalrequirementsforuseofaspecificemissionestimationthodinclude:A..ContinuousEmis·onMonitoringSystem(CEMS).(I)CEMSmustbemetapplicableperformanceificationsduringtheperiodforwhichdataibeingpresented.(ll)CEMSdataniustbentedintheunitswhichthesystemwasdes•nedtomeasure.AdditionaldatasetsusedtotrapelateCEMSdatamusthaveequalorterreliabilityforsuchextrapolationtobeacetable.(Ill)WhenusingCEMSdaestimateemissions,thedatamustinclparameters(i.e.,emissionrate,gasfletc.)necessarytoaccuratelydeteemissions.CEMSdatawhichincludeallthenecessaryparamemustbereviewedandapprovedbythetlirectororlocalairpollutioncontrolauth"tybeforeitmaybeusedtoestimateemisons;B.Stacktests.(I)Stacktestsstbeconductedonthespecificequipmentrwhichthestacktestresultsareusedtoimateemissions.(D)Stackmustbeconductedaccordingtothemethcitedin10CSR10-6.030,unlessanaltivemethodhasbeenapprovedinadbythedirectororlocalairpollutioncon1authority.(Ill)SktestswillnotbeacceptedunlessthechoiceoftestsitesandadetailedtestIan.havebeenapprovedinadvancebydirectororlocalairpollution.controlaurity.V)Stacktestswillnotbeacceptedunlesthedirectororlocalairpollutioncontrolthorityhasbeennotifiedoftestdatesleastthirty(30)daysinadvanceandthusrovidedtheopportunitytoobservethetes·•Thisthirty(30)-daynotificationmaybeucedorwaivedonacase-by-casebasisthedirectororlocalairpollutioncontroluthority.72(V)Stacktestresultswhichdonotmeetanthecriteriaofparts(3)(E)2.B.(I)-(IV)ofthisrulemaybeactableforestimatingemissions,butmubesubmittedforreviewandapprovalthedirectororlocalairpollutioncontrothorityonacase-by-casebasis;andC.EPAdocuments.OthPAdocumentsmaybeusedtoestimatemissionsiftheemissionfactorsarernopropriateorsourcespecificthanAP-42FIRE.NewlydevelopedEPAemissiontorsmustbeputr.lishedbyDecember31theyearforwhichthefacilityissubmittianEIQ.(F)EmissionFeeiting/Adjustment.1.Thedeparntmayconducton-sitedetailedreviewsdits)ofEIQs·andsupportingdocumetionasthedirectordeemsnecessary.2.TheentmaymakeemissionfeeadjustmwhenA.lericalorarithmeticerrorshavebeenma;.Submitteddocumentationisnotbyinspectionsoraudits;C.Emissionsestimatesaremodifiedasresultofemissionverificationoraudits;D.Credithasbeenincorrectlyppliedforanemissionsfeepaidtoalocalairpollutioncontrolagency;orE.Thedepartmentshallnotbelimitedbysubparagraphs(3)(F)2.A.-D.ofthisruleinmakingemissionfeeadjustments.4)ReportingandRecordKeeping.Ownersoperatorsshallmaintainrecordscontainsufficientinformationtodemonstrateliancewithallapplicableemissionfeerulequirementsasspecifiedinsubsections(3)(Ad(B).Alldataandrecordedinrdancewiththeprovisionsofthisrulesberetainedbytheowneroroperatorforlessthanfive(5)yearsaftertheendofthelendaryearinwhichthedatawascollecteandall.theserecordsshallbemadeavailabtothedirectoruponhis/herrequest.AUTiiORJTY:seion643.050,RSMo2{)()().*OriginalrufiledJune13,1984,effective.Nov.12,84.Amended:FiledApril2,1987,effecteAug.27,1987.Amended:FiledMay14,993,effectiveJan.31,1994.Amended:FilSept.2,1993,effectiveMay9,1994.Arned:FiledMay15,1995,effectiveDec.30,'5.Amended:FiledMay15,1997,effectivec.30,1997.Amended:FiledMay12,1998,ectiveDec.30,1998.Amended:FiledMay4,1999,effectiveDec.30,1999.Amende·FiledApril6,2000,effectiveNav.30,000.Amended:FiledJwre1,2001,effectiveCODEOFSTATEREGULATIONSDMslon1G-AirConservationCommission10CSR10-6.120RestrictionofEmissionsofLeadFromSpecificLeadSmelter--Ref"m·eryInstallationsPURPOSE:ThisruleestablishesmaximumaUowableratesofemissionsofleadfromstacksinspecificlead-smelterinstallations,exceptwhereNewSouicePerfo17111J11CeStandardsapply(asprovidedin10CSR6.lllD).Italsoprovidesfortheoperationand171ilintenanceufequipmentandproceduresspecifictocontroUingleademissionstotheambientair,bothfromstacksandfromthefugitiveemissionsthatescapestackcollectionsystemsattheseinstallations.(1)Applicability.(A)ThisruleshallapplytoexistinginstallationsinMissouriengagedinspecificsmeltingandrefmingfortheproductionoflead.(B)OperationandMaintenanceofLeadEmissionsControlEquipmentandProcedures.Theowneroroperatorcificleadsmeltershalloperateandmamtainallleademissionscontrolequipmentandperfonnallproceduresasrequiredbythis·rule.(2)Definitions.Definitionsofcertaintermsspecifiedinthisrule,otherthanthosespecifiedinthisrulesection,maybefoundin10CSR10-6.020.(3)GeneralProvisions.(A)OperationalMalfunction.1.Theowneroroperatorshallmaintainafilewhichidentifiesthedateandtimeofanysignificantmalfunctionofplantprocessoperationsorofemissioncontrolequipmentwhichresultsinincreasedleademissions.Thefilealsoshallcontainadescriptionofanycorrectiveactiontaken,includingthedateandtime.10CSR10-6.050Start-Up,ShutdownandMalfunctionConditionsshallapply.2.Allofthesefilesrelatingtooperationalmalfunctionshallberetainedforaminimumoftwo(2)yearsand,uponrequest,shallbemadeavailabletothedirector.(B)ProvisionsPertainingtoLimitationsofLeadEmissionsfromSpecificInstallations.(8/31/09)ROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofStateChapter 6-Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State of Missouri 10CSR11J.6 **~** l. Doe Run primary lead smelter-refuiery in Hen:ulaneum, Missouri. This installanon shan limit lead emissions into the atmosphere

to the allowable amount
as shown

in '.Dtble

I. Stack Name Main Slllck Number

7 &9 Ba&}louse Stack 'lllble

I Number

8 Bagbouse Stack Emissions **Limit~ttion** (lbs per 24 hours) 794.0 56.6 8.2 2 . Doc Run Resource **~ling** Division in **~** Mtssoun, shall limit main stack lead enussions into the atmosphere

to 0

. 00087 grains oflead per dry standard cubic feet of air

. This installation shall limit total lead production

to one htmired seventy-five thousand (175,000) tons per year. (C) Provisions Pertaining

to Limitations

of Lead Emissions From Other Than Stacks
at All Installations

. 1. The owner or operator shall control fugitive emissions

of lead from all process and area soun:es

at an installation

by mea11\JieS described

in a work practice manual identified

in paragraph (3)(C)2.
of this rule. It shall be
a violation

of this rule to fail to adhere

to the requirements

of these 'IWrk practices

. 2
. "\\brk practice manual

. A

. 'The owner
or operator shall pre

pare, submit for approval

, and tben implement

a process and area-specific work practice manual that will apply
to locations

of fugitive lead emissions

at the installation

. B. The manual shall be the method
of detenninlng compliance with the provisions of this section

. Failure

to adhere

to the 'IWrk practices

in the manual shall be a violation

of this rule

. C

. Any change

to the manual proposed by the owner or operator following
the initial approval shall be requested

in writing to the director. Arry proposed change shall demonstrate
that the change

in the work practice will not lessen the effectiveness

of the fugitive emission reductions

for the 'IWrk practice involved

. Wr

i tten approval

by the director

i s required before any change becomes effective

in the m.amal

. D

. If the director determines

a change in the 'IWrk practice manual

is necessary,
the director will notify the owner or operator
of that installation. The owner or operator shall revise the manual
to reflect these changes and submit the revised manual within thirty (30) days of receipt
of notification. These changes shall become effective following written approval

of the revised manual
by the director

. RolliN CARNAHAN (8131/09) Secretary

of State

(4 ) Reporting and Record Keeping. (A) The operator shall keep records and files generated

by the work practice manual's implementation

. (B) The work prac ti ce manual shall contain the requirement
that records

of inspections made by the operator
of fugitive emissions control equipment such as hoods, air ducts, and exhaust fans be maintained

by the operator

. (C) The Doc Run Resource Recycling Division, Bos

s , Missouri

, operator shall keep records that demonstrate compliance with the emissions limitations described

in subsection (3)(B) using the sampling methods described in subsection (S)(E)
of this rule

. These records shall be maintained

on

- site in accordance with record keeping and reporting requirements

in subsection (S)(E) of this rule. (D) Records shall be kept for
a minimum of t'IW (2) years
at the installation and shall be made available upon request
of the director for purposes

of determining compliance. (5) Test Methods. (A) The method
of detcrmiillng

the concentration

of visible emissions from stack **sou~** shall be as specified

in 10 CSR 1(). 6

. 030(9)

.

. (B) The method
of measuring lead in stack gases shall be the sampling method

as specified in 10 CSR 10-6

. 030(12). (C) The method
of quantifying

the determination
of compliance with the emission limitations from stacks
in this rule shall be as follows

: 1. Three (3) stack samplings shall be planned

to be conducted
for any one (1) stack within

a twenty-four (24)-hour period

in accordance with subsection (S)(B)
of this rule

. If this cannot be done due to weather, operating,

or other preventative conditions that develop during the twenty-four (24)-hour period, then the remaining samplings may be conducted

in a reasonable time determined

by the director following
the twenty-four (24)- hour period; 2. Each stack sample shall have

a sampling time of at least one (1) hour; 3 . The process(es) producing

the emissions
to that stack being tested shall be operating at a minimum

of ninety percent (90%) of capacity
of the process(cs)

for the full duration
of the samplings; and 4. The emission rate to be used for complian::e detennination
shall be quantified

by using the fullowing formula: Ec = T avg lbs per hour

x 24 hours

= lbs per 24 hours Where: Ec = 24-hour emission rate extrapolated CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS

from stack sampling results used for compliance determiriation;

and T avg
= Summation

of hourly emission rates of three (3) stack sampling results, divided
by three (3) for the average hourly rate. (D) The method
of measuring lead
in the ambient atmosphere shall be the reference method

as specified

in 10 CSR 10- 6.04()( 4)(G). (E) The methods
for demonstrating
compliance

at the Doc Run Resource Recycling Division

in Boss, Missouri, shall be those specified

in 40 CFR part 63

. subpart

X

. AUTHORITY: sections 643.050 and 643.055, RSMo 2000.

• Original rule filed Allg.
4, 1988, **effecri~** Dec

. 29
, 1988. Amended

: Filed Sept

. 5, 1990

, effective March 14, 1991. Amended

: Filed March

4, 1993

, effective Oct

. 10, 1993. Amended: Filed Aug.
3, 1993, effective .April
9, 1994. Amended: Filed Feb. 16, 1994

, effective Aug. 28, 1994. Amended: Filed Nov

. 14
, 1995, effective June 30, 1996. Ammded: Filed March 16, 1998, effective Oct. 30, 1998. Amended: Filed Aug. 11, 2()()(), effective March 30, 2001. Amended: Filed Aug.

6 . 2002

, effective .April 30, 2003. Amended: Filed July 1, 2004, effective March 30, 2005

. Amended: Filed Dec. 17, 2008

, effective Sept

. 30, 2009. -original Ql/llrorily

: 64J

. mo, RSMo /96!, fiiiWIIlkd 1971, 1992, 1993, 1995 turd 643

. 055, RSMo 1979

, lliMfftW 1992

, 1994

. PU. 'SE
: This ruk rpecifies the co tion.s that est lish an air pollution alert,

ch or emerge ond the associated proce, res ond emissions uction objectives

r dealing with each.

73PUBLIC HEARING 3/26/2009

Page25 1 operation
and maintenance

of equipment

at these 2 installations

. 3
This proposed amendment

is the result 4 of input from Staff from the Department

of Natural 5 Resources
Air Pollution Control Program and the Doe 6 Run Company.
The purpose

of the amendment

is to 7 modify the existing lead rule to reflect emission 8 limitations contained

in the Prevention

of 9 Significant Deterioration permit for the Doe Run

' s 10 Buick Resource Recycling facility

. The Department 11 approved Doe Run's revised P.SD permit
in

· November, 12 2007. 13

In February, 2008, Doe Run asked the 14 Missouri Air Conservation Commission

for

a variance 15 from the requirements listed
in Table III of the 16 existing rule to allow time to process

a rule 17 amendment with revised emission limitations.

The 18 requirements listed
in Table III were developed
for 19 the operation

of

a primary lead smelter

at the 20 Buick facility. Since primary smelting

no longer 21 occurs
at the facility

, the throughput charge rate 22 limits listed
in Table III are no longer valid. 23 Only secondary smelting occurs
at the facility, 24 which involves recycling

of materials with variable 25 lead content such as lead acid batteries, lead

I -

-

. -

.

.

· --

- MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES www.midwestlitigation.com

Phone: 1.800.280.3376

Fax: 314.644.1334PUBLIC HEARING 3/26/2009

Page24 l COMMISSIONER ROSENBOHM:

I notice 2 there's

a big spread there
in opinions

on the same 3 topic. 4 CHAIRMAN PENDERGRASS:

Any other 5 questions? Thank you. Katy Holmer? 6 (10 CSR 10-6.120 (amendment}, Restriction

of 7 Emissions

of Lead from Specific

L ead Smelter8 Refinery Installations) 9
KATY HOLMER, being sworn-in

by the Court 10 Reporter, testified

as follows: 11

MS. HOLMER: Good morning, Mr. Chairman 12 and members

of the Commission.

My name is Katy 13 Holmer and

I work as an Environmental

· Specialist 14 with the Missouri Department

of Natural Resources 15 Air Pollution Control Program located

at 1659 East 16 EDn Street
in Jefferson City, Missouri. 17

I am here to present testimony

on the 18 proposed amendment

to 10 CSR 10-6.120, Restriction 19 of Lead from Specific Lead Smelter-Refinery 20 Installations.

The proposed amendment
can be found 21 beginning

on page 147 of the briefing document. 22

The purpose

of this rule is to 23 establish maximum allowable rates of lead emissions 24 from stacks
at specific lead smelters and 25 refineries.

The rule

a lso provides
for the MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES www.midwestlitigation.com

Phone: 1.800.280.3376

Fax: 314.644.1334PUBLIC HEARING 3/26/2009 . .

P ag e 3 1

P R 0 C E E D I

N G S 2 (Starting time of the Hearing:

9

: 45 3 a.m.) 4 CHAIRMAN

P E NDERGRASS

: The hearing

wi

l l 5 come to order. Let the record show the follow

i ng 6 Commissioners

are present: Jack Baker, Kevin ' , . **f~** 7 ., Rosenbohm, Mark Garnett, Gary Pendergrass
and Ron i 8 Boyer. **~** 9 ' **~ ~{**  " 10 **~** i

The Air Conservat

i o n C o mmi

s s i on of the State of **M~ssouri**

ha
s ca

l led thi

s publ

i c hearing & 11 i **~** 12 purs

u ant to Sectio

n 643.070 provided Statutes

of M i ssouri, EPA propagated

as Rule 40 CFR 51

. 102, for . , **~-** i 13 **~** 14 **~**

t h e p urpose
of hearing testimo

n y relat

i ng to 10 CSR 10

- 5.570

( new rule), Control

of Su

l fur Emissions **~** 15 from Stationary Boilers

· ; 10 CSR 10-6

. 2 60 E. 16 t 17 l! 1 18 (amendment), Restriction

of Em

i ssion of Sulfur Compounds

; 10 CSR

1 0-6.120 (amendme

n t), Restriction of Emissions

of Lead from Spec

i f i c Lead Smelter

- 1 19 Refinery

I nsta

l lations

;
1 0 CSR 10

- 6

. 320 ! 20 (rescission)

, Sales Tax Exemptio

n
; and 10 CSR 10- 21 6.045 (amendm

e nt), Open Burning Requirements

. **22**

The hearing record will

c l o se at 5: 00 **~** r• t 23

p

. m., April 2nd,

2 009. Anyon

e who has not

b e e n ·I 24 scheduled

to appe

a r but wishes
to be heard

s h o uld , 25 indi cate th at you wish

t o speak on the

s ubject. MIDWEST LmGA TION SERVICES fVWW.midwestlitigation.com

P h one

: 1 . 800

. 280

. 3376

Fax

: 314

. 644

. 13341 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. PUBLIC HEARING 3/26/2009 srATE
OF MISSOURI DEPARTMENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION TRANSCRIPT

OF PROCEEDINGS Public Hearing March 26th, 2009 Community First Bank West Entrance 915 West Fort Scott Street Butler, Missouri 64730 Gary Pendergrass, Chairman Mark
s. Garnett Jack Baker Ron Boyer Kevin
L. Rosenbohm COMMISSIONERS David

s. Gilmore, Assistant James
L. Kavanaugh, Director Steve Feeler Kyra Moore David
J. Lamb STAFF

..

.

-

. - MIDW}i:ST LITIGATION SERVICES www.midwestlitigation.com

Phone: 1.800.280.3376

Page

1 - Fax: 314.644.1334

# PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF MlSSOURI,}
)ss

. 

# COUNTY
OF COLE) 

# .

nf
to 

# law says he is 

# Vice President

of 

# Central 

# Mike Vivion being 

# duly sworn, 

# ~ **~~g** the 

# N~ Tribune,

a newspaper 

# printed and 

# Missouri Newspapm,


# Inc.

, Pubhsher

af, 

# resaid

· that 

# said newspaper


# has been 

# published

in the County


# of 

# Col~ **~ta;ars;o**

and 

# tfurt the 

# notice hereto 

# attached was published 

# con~uously

**~or mor~** 

**.**

' th 

# the provisions

of Section 493.050 

# published

in 

# s;ud **~aper**


# an comp •ance Wl



# 1 

# time

as follows: R.S. 

# of Mo

. For 2000 

# as amended 

# for-- -- --

- 23rd 

# 1• 

# insertion, No.



# ....
February



# 20 09 day of 

# 2nd 

# insertion,
No

.



# ....

day of



# 20 3nl 

# insertion, No.



# ... .

day
o f



# 20 · 4th 

# insertion, No.

_,

day of



# 20 5 111 

# insertion, No

.

_. 

# Fee: $268.50

dayof

-

- 

# .20 

# m:t 

# 1/fof,.
24th Subscribed


# and swom 

# to before me 

# this-

- ------ day 

# of February

20 _ _ __ 09 __

_ _ 

# /MlxtJA-.

**Ulhil .;,)** 

. . N o tar y Publi

c ,

MISSOURI Alk CON"

; <:: ;. YATJON

. 

# cc

j

: , IMI;:;SIC:

, -1

. 

# WILL HOLD 

# fi.I~UC HEARING

· JEFFEASmrtJn:'Mo

· The

. Missouri'

Air Conservation· Commission

will hold

a put!lic hearing

on Control

of Sulfur EmiS,. slons 

# ~rom Stationary Boiler's;

.' Re:-

. 1 

# striction

· of Er:n

i sslon


# of S!llf(n'

· Compounds; Restriction

of 

# Elli1~ , srons


# of Lead

· From Specific Lead· ; Smelter. Refinery

: Installations

' ; 

# S~e$



# · · Tax Exemption;
and Open

· Burning

. Requirements

on Thllrsday, rylarch 

# 26, 2009.

· The P4blic Hear'!ilg' will begin
at 

# 9 a.m.

· at the CommunitY

· Arst Bank, 

# West

. Entrance, 

# 915 

# W~ Fort Scott Street,

· Butler, Missouri. ' The commlsslcm



# wiiJ

- hear testimony

. . 

# relat~
to 

# tbe fOllow

i ng ltem(s)

.

.

, . _ ; 

# * 10 CSR 

# 10-5

. 570 (new rule) 

# Conb:~!

**:** of S

. ulfur Emissions 

# From Stabol')iiry. Boilers

,

.

·

.
· This proposed
rule 

# wm nmlt sulfur • dioXide (S02) emissions

.. from

· ,.,. dustria/ 

# bOilers

In the 

# St. LDul
s 

# Non:-

· 

# ~ atialnment Area 

# ·By reducing 

# s¢2 

# r · emissions released

· Into

. 

# t~e



# . . atmosphere, emissions

of

!l

. r.ie . par:tlciQs

·. (PM2.5) 

# will be 

# reduce~ . This rule 

# Is Jntendfd



# tb curb' 

# emlsslori

: lri 

# the St. 

# J:.oOis

' NOnattalnment



# ' Area • in compliance



# · with the federai-'Cieiiri.

: :Air Fine Particle Implementation



# . Rulii • In

. order 

# to bring the 

# area Into



# ll-

**'** : ment 

# )'fith

. the PM2.5 Niltiqnal Ar.nbl-

: ' ent 

# Air. Quality Standards

.

.

,
. 

# ; * 10 CSR



# 1 

# 260

. (amendment)



# Fi~ ; strictlon

. . 

# of Emission

· of 

# Sult~r Compounds.

.

: : 'This

. prOposed limendmer\t



# wil!


# if mit sulfur dioXide

· (S02) emissions 

# from 

# a **prim~ry** lead smelter

In the 

# St

: • Louis Nonattainm

e nt

. Area

. By 

# r'e~ . ducing S02 emisslq'ns released Into the atmospher.e, emissions

of

· f(ne 1 

# partlcies (PM2.5) 

# will be 

# reduced

**~** This rule Is Intended



# to curb emlssloii 1 

# in 

# til$ St

. 

# Louis Nonattament


# Ania 1 

# lf! cciinp!

f ance 

# wlth.the federal creati ·Air Firie !'article Implementation
Rll(e

. In

· oilfer to bling tl_le .area.irito attUh.;

· 

# ~ment 

# with the' PM2.5 National Amb

l - · 

# ~ent 

# Ai r Quality 

# S1andard

s .

.
. .'·"

· · : · - :. j* 10 CSR 

# 1o-G.120 (amendl]lent)

Re:; "strictfon



# of Emlsslons

· . of Lead From ' Specific

. Lead

. Smelter-fle.flne.ry



# · lri f. ; stallauons.

·

.

· •

.
·.

.

, · · 01 

# 1 Tnls proposed amendment



# wiiJ , . amend the

. eXisting rule

· to ·reflect_ 

# J/ eini$sion limitations contllined

in



# . the' 

# .~ **November**

. 

# 2007 revised

· ·- ooe Rurl

. ...; Buick Preventfon

of Slgnificartt

: 6 Deterioration. (PSD) pe!:inlt tor Doe 

# q **Run·~_ ~ulck**  faCility

· 

# ~nd **addres~**

**.** , modificatiOns

tQ the 

# facll•ty's

· proces

s .: 

# -: **~s.** The condit!ons prescribed

Jn

, 

# fhi!

· proposed rule amencfment

are

· niore

. 

# !I; stringent than the cqndl)ioris found



# ih

; 

# q the state's existing ru!e

. .
.

.
.

.. 

# I * 10 CSR 

# 10-6.320 (rescission)

- Sales

· 

# Tax Exemption.

:

. · .. This propoaed rescission
will

. rescind a reguiatlon that
is no longer



# re )I 

# quired

. This rule 

# was

· written



# tci

**~** 11 establish the criteria used by-the

. MiS" • sourit Air Conservation Commiss

i on 

# f to -determine eligibility
for sales 

# ~ exemption

for Items purchased

· o( 

# leased for th

. e purpose

· of preventing,

: abating,

or

. monltoring

air pollution

in accordanc

e

·

- with section 

# f44.Q30.2(1i4)

, ASMo

. leglslatio!J

en-

. 

# a~ed

lri 2008 removes
the

. req!Jire

· me:nt

- 

# tor 

# ~he Director

· . of 

# the



# !J **part**

**~** 

# ment

, o f Natur al Resourc

e s
. t o certify sa le s 

# tax
e x emption

s
. (144

. 030

. 2, (14)) 

# p e rta

i ning

t o !h e pur
c hase or

l ease of c ertain item

s u s ed to

· m o nitor

a ir poll

u t
i on.
R e :i clnd

l ng. the rule 

# will • eli minate

c o nfu si on in 

# th e

r eg ulat
e d
. c ommunltv

" "

1! 

# p!? rt A t "" to