alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.40 Coding and ancillary policies. ( a ) *General rule.* CMS establishes uniform national definitions of services, codes to represent services, and payment modifiers to the codes.
( b ) *Specific types of policies.* CMS establishes uniform national ancillary policies necessary to implement the fee schedule for physician services. These include, but are not limited to, the following policies: ( 1 ) Global surgery policy (for example, post- and pre-operative periods and services, and intra-operative services).
( 2 ) Professional and technical components (for example, payment for services, such as an EEG, which typically comprise a technical component (the taking of the test) and a professional component (the interpretation)).
( 3 ) Payment modifiers (for example, assistant-at-surgery, multiple surgery, bilateral surgery, split surgical global services, team surgery, and unusual services).
699 A.2d 1246

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Derrick STRATTON, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 7, 1997.

John W. Packel, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court is REVERSED in accordance with *Commonwealth v. Hawkins,*547 Pa. 652, 692 A.2d 1068 (1997) and *Commonwealth v. Kue,*547 Pa. 668, 692 A.2d 1076 (1997). This matter is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this order.

CASTILLE, J., dissents.
§ 549.507 Provision of certain legal services authorized. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a) is authorized, provided that all receipts of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be specifically licensed: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings in defense of property interests subject to U.S. jurisdiction;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any Federal or State agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a), not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a) is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
#### § 576.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise specified, reference to any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, directive, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
#### Arthur J. MORRISON and Abigail K. Morrison, his wife, Appellants, v. GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, formerly First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Homestead, a United States Corporation, Appellee.

No. 79-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 9, 1979.

Arthur J. Morrison, in pro. per.

Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Mario Velez, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., SCHWARTZ, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the final summary judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Great American Federal Savings and Loan Association in its suit against Arthur J. Morrison and Abigail K. Morrison, his wife.

We reverse. The appellee failed to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of fact and was not, under the record in this case, entitled to the entry of said judgment. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

Reversed for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
# C_2006015EN.01000302.xml

| 20.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3928 — Teva/Ivax)

(2006/C 15/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3928. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3928. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeTravels With the Deputy Secretary of State…Travel to Mexico, November 9-10, 2022

# 											Travel to Mexico, November 9-10, 2022									

## 										Summary									

              -  U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman visited Mexico City, Mexico November 9-10. As the United States and Mexico approach the 200th anniversary of our diplomatic relations in December, the Deputy Secretary’s visit was an opportunity to continue momentum following the High-Level Economic and Security Dialogues and prepare for the next North American Leaders’ Summit. 
              -  The Deputy Secretary met with senior officials from the Government of Mexico, including Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, Secretary of Finance Rogelio Ramirez de la O, and Secretary of Economy Raquel Buenrostro. She also met with Mexican business leaders, representatives of the LGBTQI+ community, and activists focused on disappearances. Deputy Secretary Sherman spoke with students at Universidad La Salle about our common vision for North American prosperity and security. 

## Mexico City

            -  November 10, 2022  								Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Mexican Secretary of Finance Ramirez de la O															 
            -  November 10, 2022  								Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Mexican Secretary of Economy Buenrostro															 
            -  November 9, 2022  								Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman  Remarks at Universidad La Salle															 
            -  November 9, 2022  								Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Mexican Foreign Secretary Ebrard															 

## Public Schedule

            -  November 9, 2022  								Public Schedule – November 10, 2022															 
            -  November 9, 2022  								Public Schedule – November 9, 2022															 

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateMexico

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs...Cuba: Title III FAQs (LIBERTAD)

# 									Cuba: Title III FAQs (LIBERTAD)							

Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

**Q: When was the LIBERTAD Act enacted into law?**

A: The LIBERTAD Act was enacted into law on March 12, 1996.

**Q: What was the “effective date” of Title III of the LIBERTAD Act?**

A: Per section 306(a) of the LIBERTAD Act, the effective date of Title III was August 1, 1996. This date was never suspended.

**Q: What was suspended?**

A: Under section 306(c) of the LIBERTAD Act, successive Presidents and Secretaries of State had suspended the right to bring an action under Title III with respect to confiscated property since the August 1, 1996 effective date of the Title. However, the 30-day suspension of Title III announced March 4, 2019, was different than all prior suspensions because it excepted the right to bring an action against Cuban entities or subentities on the Cuba Restricted List. The two-week suspension announced April 3, 2019, continued this suspension and exception through May 1, 2019. On April 17, 2019, Secretary Pompeo announced he would no longer suspend the right to bring an action under Title III effective May 2, 2019.

**Q: When did the suspension end?**

A: Beginning May 2, 2019, no suspension is in effect.

**Q: Who should I contact to determine whether I am eligible to bring suit under Title III? Who should I contact if I believe I may be trafficking or be accused of trafficking?**

A: The Department recommends potential plaintiffs and defendants seek legal counsel.

**Q. Where can I find the “concise summary” of Title III referenced in section 302(a)(8) of the LIBERTAD Act?**

A: On May 17, 1996, the Attorney General published a summary of the provisions of Title III in the Federal Register, available here .

**Q: I have further questions for the Department of State regarding the LIBERTAD Act. Who should I contact?**

A: Claimants can contact the Department at CubaQuestions@state.gov questions regarding the LIBERTAD Act.

**Q: Does Title III affect claims against Cuba that have been certified by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission?**

A: If you hold a claim against Cuba certified by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (FCSC), that certified claim remains outstanding. It is not replaced or voided by Title III. It is possible that you may now be able to pursue an action in U.S. courts under Title III against a person who is trafficking in the confiscated property to which you hold a claim. To determine whether this is an option available to you, the Department recommends that you seek legal counsel.

**Q:****Where can I find information on claims against Cuba that were submitted to the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission?**

A: Information on the FCSC’s Cuba Claims Programs may be found here .

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCubaHuman Rights and Democracy

Back to Top
# C_2005315EN.01000601.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-73/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm): Brigitte and Marcus Klein v Rhodos Management Ltd (1)

1

(Brussels Convention - Jurisdiction in proceedings regarding tenancies of immoveable property - Time-share in immoveable property)

(2005/C 315/10)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-73/04, reference for a preliminary ruling under the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Germany), by Decision of 27 January 2004, received at the Court on 17 February 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Brigitte and Marcus Klein and Rhodos Management Ltd, the Court: (First Chamber) composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

On a proper construction of Article 16(1)(a) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, by the Convention of 25 October 1982 on the Accession of the Hellenic Republic and by the Convention of 26 May 1989 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic, that Article does not apply to a club membership contract which, in return for a membership fee which represents the major part of the total price, allows members to acquire a right to use on a time-share basis immoveable property of a specified type in a specified location and provides for the affiliation of members to a service which enables them to exchange their right of use.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-17-0000365 08-JUN-2017 12:36 PM

SCAD-17-0000365 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. VENETIA CARPENTER-ASUI, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC CASE NOS. 16-0-315, 16-0-316 and 17-0-009) ORDER OF SUSPENSION ( By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition submitted on April 24, 2017 by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), requesting the immediate suspension of Respondent Venetia Carpenter-Asui from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 2.12A of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i (RSCH), the declaration and exhibits attached thereto, and the record, we find Respondent Carpenter-Asui has failed to meaningfully or substantively respond to lawful requests from ODC regarding its investigations into alleged misconduct committed by her, or to respond to this court’s May 8, 2017 order to show cause as to whyshe should not be immediately suspended for the above conduct. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.12A, Respondent Carpenter-Asui is suspended from the practice of law. This order is effective immediately and until further order of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order imposing suspension upon Respondent Carpenter-Asui shall constitute a suspension for purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i and Respondent Carpenter-Asui shall therefore comply with the relevant requirements of that Rule. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to all judges, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(f). Distribution may be by electronic mail. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, June 8, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.50 Institutional dialysis services and supplies: Scope and conditions. Medicare Part B pays for the following institutional dialysis services and supplies if they are furnished in approved ESRD facilities: ( a ) All services, items, supplies, and equipment necessary to perform dialysis and drugs medically necessary and the treatment of the patient for ESRD and, as of January 1, 2011, renal dialysis services as defined in § 413.171 of this chapter.
( b ) Routine dialysis monitoring tests (i.e., hematocrit and clotting time) used by the facility to monitor the patients' fluids incident to each dialysis treatment, when performed by qualified staff of the facility under the direction of a physician, as provided in § 494.130 of this chapter, even if the facility does not meet the conditions for coverage of services of independent laboratories in part 494 of this chapter.
( c ) Routine diagnostic tests.
( d ) Epoetin (EPO) and its administration.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 43709, Sept. 4, 1991; 59 FR 1285, Jan. 10, 1994; 73 FR 20474, Apr. 15, 2008; 75 FR 49197, Aug. 12, 2010]
#### The New York Cab Co., Limited, Respondent, *v.*Moses R. Crow, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

April, 1898.)

Account stated — Presentation of account.

Mere proof that a creditor had mailed certain bills, of contents not shown, to *a.*debtor on the 1st and 15th of every month, not accompanied by any proof that the account in suit had 'ever been in any manner presented to him or that he had ever made any agreement to pay it, based upon presentation, is insufficient to support an action as for an account stated.

Apbeal from judgment of the District Court in the City of New York, for the eighth judicial district, in favor :o£ the plaintiff.

Eranklin Bien, for appellant.

J. C. Devereaux, for respondent.

Beekman, P. J.

This action was brought to recover upon an account stated. The plaintiff, however, was unable to¡ show that the particular account sued on, which was offered in evidence, had-ever been presented tó the defendant, or that any agreement to pay based on the rendition of such account had ever been made. It was stated by one of the witnesses for the plaintiff that certain bills had been mailed to the defendant on the first and fifteenth days *341of every month, hut there was no evidence in the case to show what such hills contained or how they were mailed.

It is true where the creditor has mailed an account to his debtor showing the transactions had between them, and a balance due, that is ordinarily sufficient to make out a *prima facie*case of an account stated, if coupled with proof that after the lapse of a reasonable time no objection to the account was made. The law then presumes that it has been received and examined by the debtor, and that he has acquiesced in its correctness. ITpon this an implied promise to pay the amount claimed arises. Lockwood v. Thorne, 11 N. Y. 170; Stenton v. Jerome, 54 id. 480. The creditor, however, must show what the particular account was which-he transmitted, and that it was duly forwarded to the debtor.

There is no competent proof in the case before us with respect to either of these essential 'elements. The plaintiff, therefore, failed to make out a cause of action against the defendant, and the motion made to dismiss the complaint on that ground should have been granted. It follows that the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
HomeGlobal Social Media Presence...Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

# 									Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs							

## 								Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Social Media Sites							

        - Australia
        - Brunei
        - Burma
        - Cambodia
        - China
        - Federated States of Micronesia
        - Fiji
        - Hong Kong and Macau
        - Indonesia
        - Japan
        - Laos
        - Malaysia
        - Marshall Islands
        - Mongolia
        - New Zealand
        - Palau
        - Papua New Guinea
        - Philippines
        - Samoa
        - Singapore
        - South Korea
        - Taiwan
        - Thailand
        - Timor-Leste
        - United States
        - Vietnam

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
#### Patricia HATCHER, as mother and next friend of Donald Barrows, a minor, and Patricia Hatcher, Individually, Appellants, v. Charles SCHUMAN, Sun Auto Rentals of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 79-980.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1980.

K. P. Jones of the Law Offices of K. P. Jones, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Larry Klein, West Palm Beach and Pysz-ka, Kessler & Adams, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Sun Auto Rentals.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See *Pearson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.,*187 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

MOORE, J., concurs in conclusion.
HomeJapan

# Japan

601 items

        -    Press Statement  		Advancing Global Norms for Higher Airspace Operations	  Matthew MillerDecember 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Higher Airspace Operations (HAO)	  December 18, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Eliot Kang’s Keynote Remarks at the Integrated Support Center for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security International Forum	  C.S. Eliot KangDecember 14, 2023Japan Atomic Energy AgencyTokyo, Japan 
        -    Media Note  		Inaugural United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group Meeting on  Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Activities	  December 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Japan Extended Deterrence Dialogue	  December 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Signs Memorandum of Cooperation with Japan on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces Key Measures to Jump Start Deployments of Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems and to Secure Nuclear Fuel Supply Chains, Accelerating the Contribution of Nuclear Energy to Net Zero Goals	  December 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Japan, November 29, 2023	   

previous page1…45678…61next page

Back to Top