alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 2 POWER BOILER

Month Avg SO2 tpd* Avg SO2 lb/hr*

2011

January 4.18 348.3

February 5.34 445.0

March 5.10 425.0

April 4.45 370.8

May 2.79 232.5

June 2.20 183.3

July 2.24 186.7

August 3.28 273.3

September 2.27 189.2

October 3.18 265.0

November 4.78 398.3

December 3.66 305.0

2012

January 3.79 315.8

February 4.25 354.2

March 3.57 297.5

April 4.01 334.2

May 3.49 290.8

June 2.75 229.2

July 3.56 296.7

August 3.72 310.0

September 1.08 90.0

October 3.10 258.3

November 4.56 380.0

December 5.14 428.3

2013

January 4.13 344.2

February 3.75 312.5

March 3.80 316.7

April 3.81 317.5

May 3.30 275.0

June 3.07 255.8

July 1.71 142.5

August 2.58 215.0

September 2.79 232.5

October 2.11 175.8

November 2.57 214.2

December 1.24 103.3

 Average SO2 Emission Rate (lb/hr): 280.9

* The Avg SO2 tpd was directly taken from spreadsheet previously provided by Domtar, titled "2 PB Monthly SO2 Data," which was included as an attachment 

to the August 29, 2014 letter from Annabeth Reitter, Corporate Manager of Environmental Regulation, Domtar, to Dayana Medina, U.S. EPA Region 6. The data

from this same spreadsheet is what we used calculate the average SO2 removal efficiency of the existing scrubbers (69.3%). Therefore, the average SO2 

 emission rate of 280.9 lb/hr is representative of 69.3 % control, or 30.7% uncontrolled SO2 emissions. 

Calculations for Monthly Average Emission Rate at 90% Control Efficiency: 

280.9 lb/hr = 30.7% Uncontrolled SO2 Emissions

 0.31 lb * 820 MMBtu = 254.2 lb/hr

 MMBtu hr

280.9 lb/hr = 254.2 lb/hr

30.7 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions X X = 27.8 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions (72.2% Control Efficiency) 

**254.2 lb/hr or 0.31 lb/MMBtu represents 72.2% Control Efficiency**

280.9 lb/hr = X 

30.7 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions 10 % uncontrolled SO2 emissions X = 91.5 lb/hr 
An emission rate of 91.5 lb/hr is representative of 10% uncontrolled SO2 emissions, or 90% control efficiency. 

Another way to calculate Monthly Average Emission Rate at 90% control efficiency:

280.9 lb/hr = 30.7% Uncontrolled SO2 emissions

100% Uncontrolled SO2 Emissions = 280.9 lb/hr = 914.98 lb/hr

0.307

90% Control Efficiency = 914.98 lb/hr * 0.10 = 91.5 lb/hr

91.5 lb * hr = 0.11 lb/MMBtu

 hr 820 MMBtu 
ed as an attachment 

PA Region 6. The data

e average SO2 

ol Efficiency**
#### Arthur E. Gough, Respondent, *v.*Walter Selvage, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the District Court in the city o'f Rew York for the first judicial district.

George H. Pettit, for appellant.

Arthur S. Luria, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The only questions involved in this appeal that call for any notice were- considered and disposed of adversely to the contention of the defendant by Hr. Justice Gaynor, in an action brought by this plaintiff in the Supreme Court, second judicial district, upon a policy of insurance similar to the one in suit and containing like provisions. Gough v. Davis, 24 Misc. Rep. 245. As the opinion there given- contains, we think, a correct and satisfactory exposition of the law applicable to this case it is quite unnecessary for us to enter upon any further discussion of the subject. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph L. Boutin, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted
pursuant to [SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.

                                       Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ Joseph L. Boutin
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Joseph L. Boutin
                                           President & Chief Executive Officer


                                       November 12, 2003
                                       -----------------
                                       Date


<PAGE>
# C_2006029EN.01000101.xml

| 4.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 February 2006

(2006/C 29/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2061 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4646 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5549 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,96 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5739 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,524 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,07 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8330 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6072 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,46 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,365 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5970 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6037 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3821 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3565 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7482 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9696 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 170,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3328 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7221 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 228,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,516 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,355 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,506 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2061

JPY

Japanese yen

143,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4646

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5549

ISK

Iceland króna

75,96

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5739

CZK

Czech koruna

28,524

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,07

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8330

RON

Romanian leu

3,6072

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,46

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,365

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5970

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6037

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3821

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3565

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7482

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9696

KRW

South Korean won

1 170,10

ZAR

South African rand

7,3328

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7221

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 228,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,516

PHP

Philippine peso

62,355

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0030

THB

Thai baht

47,506

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- 2012
- 0336 Directorate Identifier: 2011
- NM - 213
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Don Jensen May 2011 Concur. ATA Jo e White 31 Aug 2011 No response.

Other/Additional Information:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma’s Trip to Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma’s Trip to Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 12, 2024

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma traveled to Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan, January 8-12.

In Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Baghdad, Erbil, and Amman, Deputy Secretary Verma met with staff at the respective U.S. embassies and consulate general to thank them for their work, discuss management matters, and hear their perspectives on bilateral and regional issues.

In Baghdad, Deputy Secretary Verma met with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani and discussed our commitment to a secure, stable, and sovereign Iraq.  He emphasized the importance of close Iraqi-U.S. cooperation in addressing shared security threats.

In Islamabad, Deputy Secretary Verma discussed a wide range of shared interests and areas of mutual cooperation to advance the bilateral relationship.  He met with senior Pakistani officials, international organizations, and like-minded partners to underscore the United States’ unwavering commitment to assist Afghans who previously worked with, or on behalf of, the U.S. government.  The Deputy Secretary discussed our mutual interest in protecting vulnerable populations and facilitating resettlement for those eligible Afghans.  Deputy Secretary Verma also engaged business leaders to discuss the ways in which the United States can encourage economic reforms to support a stable and prosperous Pakistan through improved trade and investment ties.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateIraqIsraelJordanOffice of the SpokespersonPakistan

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          29,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,520
<PP&E>                                         234,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,161
<BONDS>                                         19,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,235
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322,884
<SALES>                                        225,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,570
<CGS>                                          169,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,376
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7364

THOMAS J. SESSIONS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN WHITE; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:05-cv-02712-GRA) Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 12, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas J. Sessions, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Jean Zelenka, Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas J. Sessions seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sessions has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.10 Included services. ( a ) Subject to the conditions, limitations, and exceptions set forth in this subpart, the term “inpatient hospital or inpatient CAH services” means the following services furnished to an inpatient of a participating hospital or of a participating CAH or, in the case of emergency services or services in foreign hospitals, to an inpatient of a qualified hospital: ( 1 ) Bed and board.
( 2 ) Nursing services and other related services.
( 3 ) Use of hospital or CAH facilities.
( 4 ) Medical social services.
( 5 ) Drugs, biologicals, supplies, appliances, and equipment.
( 6 ) Certain other diagnostic or therapeutic services.
( 7 ) Medical or surgical services provided by certain interns or residents-in-training.
( 8 ) Transportation services, including transport by ambulance.
( b ) *Inpatient hospital services* does not include the following types of services: ( 1 ) Posthospital SNF care, as described in § 409.20, furnished by a hospital or a critical access hospital that has a swing-bed approval.
( 2 ) Nursing facility services, described in § 440.155 of this chapter, that may be furnished as a Medicaid service under title XIX of the Act in a swing-bed hospital that has an approval to furnish nursing facility services.
( 3 ) Physician services that meet the requirements of § 415.102(a) of this chapter for payment on a fee schedule basis.
( 4 ) Physician assistant services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act.
( 5 ) Nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act.
( 6 ) Certified nurse mid-wife services, as defined in section 1861(gg) of the Act.
( 7 ) Qualified psychologist services, as defined in section 1861(ii) of the Act.
( 8 ) Services of an anesthetist, as defined in § 410.69
[48 FR 12541, Mar. 25, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 33033, Aug. 16, 1985; 58 FR 30666, May 26, 1993; 64 FR 3648, Jan. 25, 1999; 65 FR 18535, Apr. 7, 2000]
[673 NYS2d 813]

#### Fotini Theoharidou, Appellant, v Anne Newgarden, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 6, 1998

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Charles H. Small,*New York City, for appellant. *Jeffrey McAdams,*New York City, for respondent.

*98OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment entered June 24, 1996 reversed, with $10 costs, tenant’s motion for summary judgment is denied, the nonpayment petition is reinstated, and the award for rent overcharge is vacated.

Appeal from order entered October 29, 1996 denying reargument dismissed, without costs, as nonappealable.

Tenant’s rent overcharge claim below was based entirely upon an increase in the registered rent from $235.71 in 1984 to $670 in 1985, the year tenant commenced occupancy. Civil Court granted summary judgment in tenant’s favor on the overcharge, finding that landlord “ha[d] failed to show any justification for the rent increase”. Subsequent to this decision, the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1997 (L 1997, ch 116) was enacted. As here relevant, Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 26-516 (a) (2) was amended to provide that “no determination of an overcharge and no award or calculation of an award * * * may be based upon an overcharge having occurred more than four years before the complaint is filed.” The amendment further “preclude [s] examination of the rental history of the housing accommodation prior to the four-year period preceding the filing of a complaint”. (Administrative Code § 26-516 [a] [2].)

These provisions were expressly made applicable to “any action or proceeding pending in any court * * * on the effective date of this act”, i.e., to proceedings pending on June 19, 1997 (Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1997 [L 1997, ch 116, § 46 (1)]). Since the rent overcharge claim relates solely to a 1985 increase, which may not now be considered in calculating an overcharge award, the claim is barred *(Zafra v Pilkes,*245 AD2d 218; *Rovito v Melendez,*175 Misc 2d 279 [App Term, 2d Dept]).

Parness, P. J., McCooe and Freedman, JJ., concur.
§ 407.15 General enrollment period. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the general enrollment period is January through March of each calendar year.
( b ) An unlimited general enrollment period existed between April 1 and September 30, 1981. Any eligible individual whose initial enrollment period had ended, or whose previous period of entitlement had terminated, could have enrolled or reenrolled during any month of that 6-month period.
,,Turbine,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Date,Day,2,4,7,8,10,11,12,15,17,19,22,23,25,28,31
7/28/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
7/29/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
7/30/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
7/31/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
8/1/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
8/2/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/3/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/4/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
8/5/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
8/6/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
8/7/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
8/8/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
8/9/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/10/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/11/2008,M,1,,,,,X,,,,,1,,,,
8/12/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
8/13/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
8/14/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
8/15/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
8/16/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/17/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/18/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
8/19/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
8/20/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
8/21/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
8/22/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
8/23/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/24/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/25/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
8/26/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
8/27/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
8/28/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
8/29/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
8/30/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8/31/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/1/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
9/2/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
9/3/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
9/4/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
9/5/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
9/6/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/7/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/8/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
9/9/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
9/10/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
9/11/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
9/12/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
9/13/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/14/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/15/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
9/16/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
9/17/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
9/18/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
9/19/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
9/20/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/21/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/22/2008,M,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,
9/23/2008,T,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,
9/24/2008,W,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,,
9/25/2008,H,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1,
9/26/2008,F,,,,,1,,,,,1,,,,,1
9/27/2008,Sa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9/28/2008,Su,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
HomeNorway

# Norway

141 items

        -    Media Note  		Second Meeting of the Counterterrorism Law Enforcement Forum	  June 7, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks for CT Deputy Coordinator Ian Moss at the Counterterrorism Law Enforcement Forum 	  Ian MossJune 6, 2023Counterterrorism Law Enforcement ForumOslo, Norway 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Norwegian Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 1, 2023City Hall Oslo, Norway  
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Simen Ekern of NRK TV	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 1, 2023The National MuseumOslo, Norway 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 1, 2023The National MuseumOslo, Norway 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Norwegian Foreign Minister Huitfeldt	  June 1, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Transatlantic Quad Foreign Ministers	  June 1, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg After Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 1, 2023City HallOslo, Norway 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre After Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 31, 2023Government Guest HouseOslo, Norway 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Sweden, Norway, Finland, France, and the UK	  May 31, 2023 

previous page123456…15next page

Back to Top
AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wesley E. Colley, state and attest that:



(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the
Registrant).



(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Wesley E. Colley                 
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | May 5, 2004