alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Loran W. HARDIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 1978.

Eugene P. Spellman and Denis Dean, Sr., Miami, for appellant.

Sidney B. Shapiro, City Atty., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, a former policeman of the City of North Miami Beach, appeals a final judgment on his petition for writ of certio-rari brought to review his dismissal by the City. The dismissal was upheld by the City’s Civil Service Board.

We are not reviewing here the correctness of the decision of the Civil Service Board, but rather the circuit court’s action in denying the petition for writ of certiora-ri, and in this regard we are limited to the question of whether the circuit court departed from established law in finding against the petitioner. See *Nugent v. Florida Hotel and Restaurant Commission,*147 So.2d 606 (Fla.2d DCA 1962).

Within this narrow parameter of review, we find no reversible error. Although in our view, the judgment of the Civil Service Board was unduly harsh, we have no basis upon which to substitute our judgment for that of the circuit court.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
1517 W EST F RONT S TREET  S UITE 354  TYLER , TX 75702  T EL : 903-593-8471  FAX : 903-593-2193 Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us C HIEF J USTICE J AMES T. W ORTHEN J USTICES B RIAN H OYLE G REG N EELEY 

# TWELFTH 

# C OURT OF 

# A PPEALS C LERK C ATHY S. L USK C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY M ARGARET H USSEY 

## February 3, 2015 Ms. Lois Rogers District Clerk, Smith County Courthouse, Suite 204 100 North Broadway Avenue Tyler, TX 75702-7201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Case Number: 12-14-00154-CR Trial Court Case Number: 114-1255-13 Style: Kimberly Bowman v. The State of Texas Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the information below and to return the attached copy to this office. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK By:_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk C C : Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Aaron Rediker (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mandate executed on ___4TH day of ___ fEBRUARY__________, 2015. Brief explanation of action taken: ____ SCANNED ____________________________________

______________________LINDA RHYMES _________________________District/County Clerk
#### Ex parte Darrell WALKER. (Re Darrell WALKER v. Jimmy JOHNSON).

79-500.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1980.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,757
<OTHER-SE>                                     (24,309)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,534)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,534)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Canadian Deputy Foreign Minister Morrison

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Canadian Deputy Foreign Minister Morrison							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 27, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Campbell spoke today with Canadian Deputy Foreign Minister David Morrison. They discussed the United States and Canada’s strong partnership and enduring commitment to Ukraine’s self-defense, achieving lasting peace in the Middle East, and resolving the ongoing crisis in Haiti. Deputy Secretary Campbell underscored the urgent need to reach agreement on a modernized Columbia River Treaty.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCanadaDeputy Secretary of StateHaitiMiddle EastOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsUkraine

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.24


 





 



    1


     


    

 


 









    2


     


    

 





 






    3


     


    

 









    4


     


    

 





 






    5


     


    

 





 






    6


     


    

 





 






    7


     


    

 





 






    8


     


    

 





 






    9


     


    

 





 






    10


     


    

 





 






    11


     


    

 





 






    12


     


    

 





 






    13


     


    

 





 






    14


     


    

 





 






    15


     


    

 





 






    16


     


    

 





 






    17


     


    

 





18
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Clarence E. FOURNIER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 55258.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1974.

In re: Clarence E. Fournier, applying for writ of Habeas Corpus.

Writ denied. The issue is moot. An out of time appeal has been granted.
§ 3.550 Stay of the Secretary's decision. ( a ) Pending judicial review, the respondent may file a request for stay of the effective date of any penalty with the ALJ. The request must be accompanied by a copy of the notice of appeal filed with the Federal court. The filing of the request automatically stays the effective date of the penalty until such time as the ALJ rules upon the request.
( b ) The ALJ may not grant a respondent's request for stay of any penalty unless the respondent posts a bond or provides other adequate security.
( c ) The ALJ must rule upon a respondent's request for stay within 10 days of receipt.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1996
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,487
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              35
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   500
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,555
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         103,029
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        388,036
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (16,103)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 577,031
<DEPOSITS>                                     500,099
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,158
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,818
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,419
<COMMON>                                            44
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 577,031
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,043
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    73
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,450
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,468
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,990
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (40)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,365
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,365
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.57
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,316
<LOANS-PAST>                                        80
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,362
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,736
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (480)
<RECOVERIES>                                       583
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,103
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,103
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,451
        


</TABLE>
#### Morris LIEBMAN, Appellant, v. Ronald S. ROBERTS, Appellee.

Nos. 74-164, 74-165, 74-166, 74-396 and 74-397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed.
eigr-ex1032_1138.htm



Exhibit 10.32

AMENDMENT #7 TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

This Amendment #7 to License Agreement (“Amendment #7”) is entered into as of the date of last signature below (“Amendment #7 Effective Date”) by and between Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (formerly known as Schering Corporation), a New Jersey corporation having a place of business at 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 (“Merck”) and Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a place of business at 2155 Park Boulevard, CA 94306 (“Licensee”) (each of Merck and Licensee, a “Party”, and together, the “Parties”) to amend that certain License Agreement between the Parties dated September 3, 2010, as amended on January 18, 2011 and subsequently first amended June 11, 2013, as second amended November 20, 2014, as third amended March 6, 2015, as fourth amended June 9, 2015, as fifth amended December 15, 2015, as sixth amended on May 15, 2018 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Definitions





	
 
	
a.
	
The following definition in Article I is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:




“Progeria” shall mean Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome and Progeroid Laminopathies.


	
 
	
2.
	
Except as set forth herein, all capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment #7 shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.





	
 
	
3.
	
In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment #7 and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment #7 shall govern.





	
 
	
4.
	
Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment #7 by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment #7 Effective Date.

 


	
Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc.
	
 
	
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Sriram Ryali
	
 
	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Benjamin Thorner

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
	
 
	
Sriram Ryali
	
 
	
Name:
	
 
	
Benjamin Thorner

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
 
	
Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
Title:
	
 
	
SVP & Head of BD&L, MRL

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
November 3, 2020
	
 
	
Date:
	
 
	
November 3, 2020
#### § 137.76 When must the Secretary transfer to a Self-Governance Tribe funds identified in a funding agreement?

When a funding agreement requires an annual transfer of funding to be made at the beginning of a fiscal year, or requires semiannual or other periodic transfers of funding to be made commencing at the beginning of a fiscal year, the first such transfer shall be made not later than 10 days after the apportionment of such funds by the OMB to the Department, unless the funding agreement provides otherwise.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mohammad Reza SALIMY.

No. 80-K-2713.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Mohammad Reza Salimy, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 2-80-398.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**
  The
        undersigned, as the chief financial
        officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge,
        that
        the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, which
        accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
        in
        the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates
        and for
        the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
        not be relied upon for any other purpose.
 
 Dated
        this 16th day of March,
        2007.
  
 */s/
                  Donald J. Torbert, Jr.*Donald
                  J. Torbert, Jr.Executive
                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
        to the SEC or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,014,680
<SECURITIES>                                   103,055
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,332
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      23,832,031
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,246,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,120,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      6,964,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,935,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,120,854
<SALES>                                      3,030,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,073,103
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,481,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                68,680
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             583,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (189,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (189,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (189,390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE THE VALUE
IS $0.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Allen T. CONLAY, Applicant, v. HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 64476.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 31, 1979.

Gahagan & Gahagan by Russell E. Gaha-gan, Natchitoches, for applicant, Allen T. Conlay.

Gold, Little, Simon, Weems & Bruser by Eugene J. Sues, Alexandria, for respondent, Houston General Insurance Co.

JOINT MOTION AND ORDER TO DISMISS APPEAL

On joint motion of applicant, Allen T. Conlay, and respondent, Houston General Insurance Company, through their respective undersigned counsel, and on suggesting to the Court that an amicable settlement of the above captioned matter has been reached by the above parties;

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above appeal be and it is hereby dismissed at the cost of respondent, Houston General Insurance Company.
Exhibit 23.1

   CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-15780) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1986
Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-82214) pertaining
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1986 Stock Option Plan and the 1994
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-100931) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113849) pertaining
to the (1986) Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the
2004 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Omega Financial
Corporation, of our report dated March 15, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Omega Financial Corporation, Omega
Financial Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Omega Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2005


                                       59
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











I,
      Dennis
      J. FitzSimons, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune
      Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      April 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended April 1, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and the results of operations of Tribune
      Company.














/s/
                Dennis J. FitzSimons
              Dennis
                J. FitzSimons
              Chairman,
                President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              
              May
                9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       1,975,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,220,286
<PP&E>                                         272,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,532,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,084,005
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,019
<OTHER-SE>                                   (858,936)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,532,319
<SALES>                                        288,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,979
<CGS>                                          121,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,564,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (48,111)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,348,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,348,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,348,875)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 801.211 Pilot program effective date.

The term *pilot program effective date* means November 10, 2018.