alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 13, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the                     *Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: August 31, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-21460 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 407.32 Prejudice to enrollment rights because of Federal Government misrepresentation, inaction, or error. If an individual's enrollment or nonenrollment in SMI is unintentional, inadvertent, or erroneous because of the error, misrepresentation, on inaction of a Federal employee or any person authorized by the Federal Government to act in its behalf, the Social Security Administration or CMS may take whatever action it determines is necessary to provide appropriate relief. The action may include: ( a ) Designation of a special initial or general enrollment period;
( b ) Designation of an entitlement period based on that enrollment period;
( c ) Adjustment of premiums;
( d ) Any combination of actions under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section; or
( e ) Any other remedial action that may be necessary to correct or eliminate the effects of the error, misrepresentation, or inaction.
**Exhibit No. 21.1**

** **

** **

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

**As of June 30, 2010**

 

1.       PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. (formerly Providential Capital, Inc.)

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity:  Consulting and M&A advisory services

 

2.       Providential Vietnam, Ltd.

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Consulting

 

3.       Philand Ranch Limited –  UK

Percentage of ownership: 75.50%

Business activity: real estate development

 

4.       PHI Mining Group, Inc. (formerly DDC Industries, Inc.)

Percentage of ownership: 82.71%

Business activity: Mining

 

5.       Providential Energy Corporation

Percentage of ownership: 100%

Business activity: Independent Oil & Gas, Alternative Energy

 

6.       Provimex, Inc

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Trading and Imports/Exports

 

7.        Vietnam Media Group, Inc. (formerly Touchlink Communications, Inc.)

Percentage of ownership: 85%

Business activity: Multi-media

 

 

----
# C_2005296EN.01000602.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-200/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof, Finanzamt Heidelberg v ISt internationale Sprach- und Studienreisen GmbH (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Special scheme for travel agents and tour operators - Article 26(1) - Scope - Package comprising travel to the host State and/or the stay in that State and language tuition - Principal service and ancillary service - Definition - Directive 90/314/EEC on package travel, package holidays and package tours)

(2005/C 296/12)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-200/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), made by decision of 18 March 2004, received at the Court on 5 May 2004, in the proceedings between Finanzamt Heidelberg and ISt internationale Sprach- und Studienreisen GmbH — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris and G. Arestis (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 26 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, should be interpreted as meaning that it applies to a trader who offers services such as the ‘High School’ and ‘College’ programmes involving the organisation of language and study trips abroad and which, in consideration of the payment of an all-inclusive sum, provides in its own name to its customers a stay abroad of three to 10 months and buys in services from other taxable persons for that purpose.

---

(1)  OJ C 190 of 24.07.2004.

1

---
HomePeople...Dafna H.  Rand

# 				Dr. Dafna H.  Rand			

															Director						Office of Foreign Assistance												

				June 21, 2021 -									May 12, 2023							

**Dafna H.  Rand's term ended on May 12, 2023.** Dr. Dafna H. Rand is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assistance (F) at the Department of State. From 2017-2021, she was the Vice President of Policy and Research at Mercy Corps, a non-governmental organization working in 40 countries to support communities in need. Dr. Rand has a long career in public service: She has served as a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) and as a member of the Policy Planning staff at the State Department. She also served on the staff of the National Security Council during the Obama administration. Dr. Rand is the former Deputy Director of Studies at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and a former professional staff member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). She started her career in government as the foreign policy and defense legislative assistant to Senator Frank R. Lautenberg.Dr. Rand’s research has focused on international security and democratic reform in the Middle East and North Africa, including two books on the subject. She earned a PhD in political science at Columbia University and an AB at Harvard University.
Tags
Office of Foreign AssistanceState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 1002.203 State exclusion of certain managed care entities. ( a ) The State agency, in order to receive FFP, must provide that it will exclude from participation *any* managed care organization (as defined in section 1903(m) of the Act) or entity furnishing services under a waiver approved under section 1915(b)(1) of the Act, if such organization or entity— ( 1 ) Has a prohibited ownership or control relationship with any individual or entity that could subject the managed care organization or entity to exclusion under § 1001.1001 or § 1001.1551 of this chapter or
( 2 ) Has, directly or indirectly, a substantial contractual relationship with an individual or entity that could be excluded under § 1001.1001 or § 1001.1551 of this chapter.
( b ) As used in this section, the term— *Exclude* includes the refusal to enter into or renew a participation agreement or the termination of such an agreement.
*Substantial contractual relationship* is one in which the sanctioned individual described in § 1001.1001 of this chapter has direct or indirect business transactions with the organization or entity that, in any fiscal year, amount to more than $25,000 or 5 percent of the organization's or entity's total operating expenses, whichever is less. Business transactions include, but are not limited to, contracts, agreements, purchase orders, or leases to obtain services, supplies, equipment, space or salaried employment.
[57 FR 3343, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 46691, Sept. 2, 1998; 82 FR 4118, Jan. 12, 2017]
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 1: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 1: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 1 [1 MB]
        - Fitisemanu appellate brief (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )
        - Dvash-Banks brief in support of en banc review (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )
        - Bautista-Rosario brief in support of motion to dismiss (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )
        - E.B. v. State brief opposing summary judgment (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )
        - Cuthill v. Pompeo brief on appeal 2nd Circuit (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )
        - HIAS, Inc. v. Trump, brief on appeal 4th Circuit (available by email by request to  ldigest@state.gov )

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Clark McCarthy Healthcare Partner II ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W9126G-13-C-0004 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60260 

Kevin J. Gleeson, Esq. 

Sullivan, Ward, Asher & Patton, P.C. 

Southfield, MI 

Harry Z. Rippeon III, Esq. 

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP 

Atlanta, GA 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Dawn-Carole Harris, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Fort Worth 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been resolved amicably by the parties. Pursuant to their joint 

stipulation, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. 

Dated: April 22, 2019 

TERRENCES S. HARTMAN 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60260, Appeal of Clark McCarthy 

Healthcare Partners II, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 170 (Thursday, September 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1400-000]


Milford Wind Corridor Phase I, LLC; Notice of Filing

August 27, 2009.
    Take notice that, on August 26, 2009, Milford Wind Corridor Phase 
I, LLC filed to supplement its filing in the above-captioned proceeding 
with information required under the Commission's regulations. Such 
filing served to reset the filing date in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b2d2e392824050702050e381e1b1b04191f2b0d0e1908450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f696a7d6c60414346414a7c5a5f5f405d5b6f494a5d4c01484059">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 16, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21243 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2005155EN.01001101.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 April 2005

in Case T-88/01, Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(State aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Measure of individual concern to the applicant)

(2005/C 155/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-88/01: Sniace SA, established in Madrid (Spain), represented by J. Baró Fuentes, M. Gómez de Liaño y Botella and F. Rodríguez Carretero, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Triantafyllou and J. Buendía Sierra, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by Republic of Austria (Agents: H. Dossi and M. Burgstaller, with an address for service in Luxembourg), by Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG, established in Heiligenkreuz im Lafnitztal (Austria), and by Land Burgenland (Austria), represented by U. Soltész, lawyer — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2001/102/EC of 19 July 2000 on State aid granted by Austria to Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG (OJ 2001 L 38, p. 33) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas, J.D. Cooke, P. Mengozzi and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

| 3. | Orders the interveners to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the interveners to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 186 of 30.6.2001.

1

---
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Cromer, Sharon L. Republic of The Gambia – July 2021

# 									Cromer, Sharon L. Republic of The Gambia – July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Republic of The Gambia

CANDIDATE:     Sharon L. Cromer

Sharon L. Cromer, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Career Minister, currently serves as the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Mission Director at the U.S. Embassy, Accra, Ghana. Previously she was the USAID Mission Director at the U.S. Embassy Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and she has also been USAID Mission Director at the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria. In addition, Ms. Cromer had an earlier assignment in Accra as Mission Director. In Washington, Ms. Cromer served in USAID as Senior Deputy Assistant Administrator and Acting Assistant Administrator in the Africa Bureau, as the Deputy Assistant Administrator in the Management Bureau, and as the Acting Senior Deputy Assistant Administrator and Acting Assistant Administrator in the Bureau of Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance. Ms. Cromer’s extensive experience with development policy and programs in Africa, coupled with her demonstrated ability to lead her teams effectively in a complex interagency environment, make her a well-qualified candidate for Ambassador to the Republic of The Gambia.

Among her other assignments, Ms. Cromer was first a Supervisory Contracting Officer, and then the USAID Deputy Mission Director, at the U.S. Embassy, Jakarta, Indonesia.  Earlier she was a Regional Supervisory Contracting Officer at the USAID Mission in Dakar, Senegal.  She also held positions in the Ivory Coast and Pakistan, and as a Contracting Officer in the Office of Procurement in USAID’s Management Bureau.

Ms. Cromer earned her B.A. from Barnard College, Columbia University and her J.D. degree from Georgetown University Law School. She is a recipient of a Presidential Rank Award, the USAID Administrator’s Reengineering Award, a State Department Superior Honor Award, and multiple performance awards for her service.

Back to Top
# C_2005205EN.01002303.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/23

---

Action brought on 27 May 2005 by Hippocrate Vounakis against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-214/05)

(2005/C 205/44)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 27 May 2005 by Hippocrate Vounakis, residing in Wezembeek-Oppem (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision of the Commission establishing his 2003 Career Development Report; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision of the Commission establishing his 2003 Career Development Report;

| 2. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By his claim, the applicant seeks annulment of his 2003 Career Development Report. In support of his action, he submits that the contested report infringes Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, their general implementing provisions and the duty to give reasons and is the result of a manifest error of assessment. In that context, the applicant points to several alleged inconsistencies between, on the one hand, the marks awarded to him and, on the other, the associated comments.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2681 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2681

To amend the act of incorporation of the American University to reduce 
  the minimum number of members of the University's Board of Trustees 
                             from 40 to 25.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 28, 1995

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the act of incorporation of the American University to reduce 
  the minimum number of members of the University's Board of Trustees 
                             from 40 to 25.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN MINIMUM NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES 
              OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.

    (a) In General.--The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
incorporate the American University'', approved February 24, 1893 (27 
Stat. 476), is amended by striking ``forty'' and inserting ``twenty-
five''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document

Exhibit 10.13

Certain Agreed Employment Terms Amending Original Offer


																
	Executive and Title	Annualized Base Salary	Target Annual Bonus (% of Annualized Base Salary)	Severance - Non-Change in Control	Change in Control Severance	
	Jim Fusaro (CEO)	$650,000	100%	18 months base salary
	24 months base salary, plus target Annual Bonus
# Lithuania

117 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Lithuania	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Lithuania	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at “Imprisoned Without Just Cause: #FreeThemAll” event hosted by the Lithuanian Embassy	  Uzra ZeyaMarch 27, 2023Embassy of LithuaniaWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Lithuania	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 6, 2023	  Ned PriceMarch 6, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis Before Their Meeting	  March 6, 2023Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Lithuania National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 16, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation with Lithuania	  November 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Peter Harrell,  Senior Director for International Economics and Competitiveness, Ruth Berry,  Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Information and Communications Policy,  and Peter A. Winn,  Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer	  October 7, 2022 

previous page12345…12next page

Back to Top