alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 301

To restore the grave marker allowance for veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To restore the grave marker allowance for veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRAVE MARKER ALLOWANCE.

4 Section 906 of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(e) In lieu of furnishing a headstone or marker

8 under subsection (a)(2) or (b) of this section, the Sec9 retary, in the Secretary’s discretion, having due regard for

10 the circumstances in each case, may reimburse the person

11 entitled to request such headstone or marker for the cost

12 of acquiring a non-Government headstone or marker for
2

•HR 301 IH

1 placement in any cemetery other than a national cemetery

2 in connection with the burial or memorialization of the de3 ceased individual. The cost referred to in the preceding

4 sentence is the cost actually incurred by or on behalf of

5 such person or the cost prepaid by the deceased individual

6 as the case may be. Reimbursement under this subsection

7 may be made only upon the request of the person entitled

8 to request the headstone or marker and may not be made

9 in an amount in excess of the average actual cost, as deter10 mined by the Secretary, of headstones and markers fur11 nished under subsections (a) and (b) of this section.’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Kenneth Lee SIMMONS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 67684.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Kenneth Lee Simmons applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. No. 178-906.

Denied.
#### Patricia A. MORGAN, Appellant, v. William A. MORGAN, Jr., Appellee.

No. 81-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1981.

Joseph C. Segor, Eleanor Levingston Schockett, Miami, for appellant.

Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley and Norman Perlberger, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The general rule is that a judgment or decree wholly in favor of a party cannot be appealed by [her], since [she] is not aggrieved thereby. 3 Fla. Jur.2d, Appellate Review § 19 (1978).

*1102The appellant received exactly the relief requested. Accordingly, the Order under review is affirmed. *Lovett v. Lovett,*93 Fla. 611, 112 So. 768 (1927); *North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside,*72 So.2d 659 (Fla.1954).
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.25 Primary payer's notice of primary payment responsibility. ( a ) If it is demonstrated to a primary payer that CMS has made a Medicare primary payment for services for which the primary payer has made or should have made primary payment, it must provide notice about primary payment responsibility and information about the underlying MSP situation to the entity or entities designated by CMS to receive and process that information.
( b ) The notice must describe the specific situation and the circumstances (including the particular type of insurance coverage as specified in § 411.20(a)) and, if appropriate, the time period during which the insurer is primary to Medicare.
( c ) The primary payer must provide additional information to the designated entity or entities as the designated entity or entities may require this information to update CMS' system of records.
[54 FR 41734, Oct. 11, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 1820, Jan. 19, 1990; 73 FR 9684, Feb. 22, 2008]
Provide a brief summary of the formation treatment: Treatment Dates: Start: End:

Perforations

Test Information

Calculated 24 Hour Rate:

Tubing Size:

Squeezed:

Reason for Non-Production:

Date Formation Abandoned: If yes number of sacks cement:

Bridge Plug Depth: Sacks of cement on top of bridge plug:

Formation Abandonment

Formation: Status:

Top: Bottom: No. Holes: Hole Size: Open Hole:

This formation is commingled with another formation

Test Method:

Gas Disposition: Gas Type: BTU Gas: API Gravity Oil:

Total fluid used in treatment (bbl):

Flowback volume recovered (bbl):

Total proppant used (lbs):

Max pressure during treatment (psi):

Min frac gradient (psi/ft):

Total gas used in treatment (mcf): Fluid density at initial fracture (lbs/gal)

Type of gas used in treatment:

Number of staged intervals:

Recycled water used in treatment (bbl):

Fresh water used in treatment (bbl): Disposition method for flowback:

Tubing Setting Depth: Tbg Setting Date: Packer Depth:

Casing PSI: Tubing PSI: Choke Size:

Bbls Oil: Mcf Gas: Bbls Water:

Test Date: Bbls Oil: Mcf Gas: Bbls Water:

GOR:

Formation Treatment

Rule 805 green completion techniques were utilized:

Date of First Production for this formation: 

Yes No

Test Hours:

Attach wireline and cement job summary.

Treatment Type:

Total acid used in treatment (bbl):

Reason why green completion not utilized: Fracture stimulations must be reported on FracFocus.org

Page

1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 801, Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303)894-2100 Fax:(303)894-2109

OP OGCC

State of Colorado 

Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

COMPLETED INTERVAL REPORT 

Wellbore Diagram

The Completed Interval Report, Form 5A, shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of completing a 

formation (successful or not), when a formation is temporarily abandoned or permanently abandoned, for 

a recompletion, reperforation or restimulation, or when a formation is commingled. Fill out a page for 

each formation. Attach as many pages as required to fully describe the work. List in order of completion. 

The completion date for a formation is the Treatment End Date. Reported quantities shall be the total 

amounts used and recovered as of the submittal date of this form.

Complete the 

Attachment 

Checklist

For COGCC Use Only

OGCC Operator Number:

Name of Operator:

Address:

City: State: Zip:

Name:

Phone:

FAX:

API Number: 05- County:

Well Name: Well Number:

Location (QtrQtr, Sec, Twp, Rng, Meridian):

Form 

5A 

Rev 6/12

of

Wireline Summary

I hereby certify that the statements made in this form are, to the best of my knowledge, true, correct and complete. 

Signature:

Print Name: Email: 

Title: Date:

email:

Operator Contact

Sidetrack:

Cement Summary

Net Pressure Chart

Field Code: Field Name:
HomeUkraine

# Ukraine

1741 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba	  March 31, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine - Crimea	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Nord Stream 2 and Potential Sanctionable Activity	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 18, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Ukraine	  March 18, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 5, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		Public Designation of Oligarch and Former Ukrainian Public Official Ihor Kolomoyskyy Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 5, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Crimea Is Ukraine	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 25, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Anti-Corruption and Transparency  		Recognizing Anticorruption Champions Around the World	  James A. WalshFebruary 23, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Strengthening Civil Society in Ukraine	  February 22, 2021 

previous page1…165166167168169…175next page

Back to Top
§ 23.13 What nondiscrimination requirements apply to National Health Service Corps sites? National Health Service Corps sites are advised that in addition to complying with the terms and conditions of this regulation, the following laws and regulations are applicable— ( a ) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (43 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.*) and its implementing regulations, 45 CFR part 80 (prohibiting discrimination in federally assisted programs on the grounds of race, color, or national origin); and
( b ) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and its implementing regulations, 45 CFR part 84 (prohibiting discrimination in federally assisted programs on the basis of handicap).
( c ) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 *et seq.)* and its implementing regulations, 45 CFR part 91 (prohibiting nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance).
[45 FR 12790, Feb. 27, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 38109, Sept. 27, 1984]
| **Exhibit 31.1** |
|------------------|

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Henry Fahman, Principal Executive Officer, PHI Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of PHI Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.PHI GROUP, INC.

/s/ Henry FahmanHenry Fahman, Principal Executive Officer Dated: October 08, 2010             

 

----
g

TED STA 1CO
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP Sees

DE SOTO CANYON

DE SOTO CANYON
NOS NH 16-11
# C_2006036EN.01001602.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 8 December 2005

in Case C-38/05: Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 - Control system within the fisheries sector - Information on types and quantities of fish landed and on fishing effort)

(2006/C 36/31)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-38/05, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: B. Doherty) v Ireland (Agent: D.J. O'Hagan, assisted by A. Schuster and E. Fannon, Barristers) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 1 February 2005 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and P. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 December 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Ireland

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to communicate the data required under Articles 15(4) and 18(1) and the first and third indents of Article 19i of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2635/97 of 18 December 1997, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to communicate the data required under Articles 15(4) and 18(1) and the first and third indents of Article 19i of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2635/97 of 18 December 1997, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

| 2. | Orders Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 02.04.2005.

1

---
# Venezuela

160 items

        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Venezuela	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Venezuela National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 5, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the COVID-19 Global Action Plan Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 15, 2022Loy Henderson AuditoriumWashington, D.C.  
        -    Fact Sheet  		Additional $314 Million for U.S. Humanitarian Response to the Venezuela Regional Crisis	  June 10, 2022 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Jorge Ramos of TelevisaUnivision	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 9, 2022Los Angeles Convention CenterLos Angeles, California 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Venezuela	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Announces Additional Humanitarian Assistance for the Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants in Chile	  Ned PriceMay 4, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Venezuelan Interim President Guaidó	  May 2, 2022 

previous page1…56789…16next page

Back to Top
# Countries & Areas

		Subscribe		

198 items

        -    		Tonga	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		Trinidad and Tobago	  April 24, 2019 
        -    		Tunisia	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Turkey (Türkiye)	  April 25, 2019 
        -    		Turkmenistan	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Tuvalu	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		Uganda	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		Ukraine	  April 25, 2019 
        -    		United Arab Emirates	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		United Kingdom	  April 25, 2019 

previous page1…17181920next page

Back to Top
§ 526.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201, such property shall no longer be deemed to be property blocked pursuant to § 526.201, unless there exists in the property another interest that is blocked pursuant to § 526.201, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201, such property shall be deemed to be property in which such person has an interest and therefore blocked.
.- . 

ggm.D c. u*nw .,*all*=. ..*..A& 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hon. Charley Lookhart 

State Treasurer 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

or not, in the absenoe 

Clerk of that Departtoen 

name, with the words wl. 

his name to Sta 

issued to the E 

Old Age Aeslsta 

oonstitution 

0r thr State 

oi Dallas, oovering 

d to the Treaeurrr. 

tar i5 an eleotive 

e authorlty and duty 

‘presorlbed by the Conatlcle 4 of the Constitution 

states that such OffiOer shall 

or may be required of him by 

OH’S nme as “kct.inG ‘Treasurer** and do such other 

acts and ttincs as the State Treasurer hicseli 

might legally do. The legal acts and signatures 

of mch Chief Clerk as Acriq Treasurer, ehal1 

be as valid a8 the acts and signatures of the 

Treasurer hiceelf.” 

Tbe authority of the Chier Cl;lrk to act in the 

place end atead of the State Treasurer, upon the happeni% 

of the presorlbed oondit’ons, therefore, erhte by virtue 

of tbe above etstuts. There le Involved no unoonstitutionel 
. . 

Hon. Charley Lookhart, June 0, 1939, Page 2. 

Qeleg,atlon or deprivation of authority, for the authority 

Of the Treasurer and the duties Imposed upon him ere not 

derived from the Constitution, b*lt from the Legislature. 

The authority having been vested in the Legislature to 

presorlbe the dutlee to attach to the offioe of State 

Treasurer, there ie nothlne to prohlblt the Laglelature 

from authorizihg ) as it has In this not, the performance 

of those duties by the Chfef Clerk to the Treasurer, as 

Aotiq Treasurer, under the prescribe4 oodlltlons oontained la the statute itself. Pfeffer VB. Xahnke, et al (Comm. 

of Appeals, Sea. 8; Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court), 

260 s. X. 1031. 

You are, therefore, adQised that, in the abaencr 

of the State Treasurer, tha Chief Clerk to the Treasurer 

h3s authority to slen his own name with the words wActin& 

State Treasurer” following his name, to the State of Texer 

Treasury Certlfiaates to be issued to the pepublio National 

Bank of Dalles, Texas, ooverlng Old Age A~sistanoe ?‘arrants 

submitted to the State Treasurer. 

Youre very truly 

ATTORNEY GENXRAL C@ TEXAS 

m 

R. B. FalrohllQ 

Assistant 

R-#F:WP 

APPROVSD: 

ATTORNSY GEXERAL bF TEXAS
#### Carol COLE et al., Appellants, v. BARFIELD INVESTMENT CORP., Appellee.

No. 74-553.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Wm. Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismisssed.
40991.

#### ALLEN v. McDERMOTT et al.

*537Decided October 23, 1964.

*538*Marshall L. Fountain,*for plaintiff in error.

*Kermit C. Bradford,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

The exception to the overruling of the general demurrers is without merit; nor does it matter that the orders were entered after the return of the verdict on the pleas to the jurisdiction. See *McLaurin v. Fields,*4 Ga. App. 688 (1) (62 SE 114).

The evidence raised a question of fact as to whether Allen was a resident of Fulton County or of Jefferson County. It did not demand a finding that he was a resident of either county. He was admittedly of full age, was single and was spending at least five nights of each week in Atlanta where he was working. *Hinton v. Lindsay,*20 Ga. 746 (1). For the purposes of *Code*§ 79-401 he was without family. See *Forlaw v. Augusta Naval Stores Co.,*124 Ga. 261, 268 (52 SE 898). The jury was authorized to find that his “most notorious place of abode” was in Fulton County; consequently, his residence. *Cunningham v. Maund & Wade,*2 Ga. 171, 172.

We doubt that there was error in excluding the Selective Service registration certificate dated in 1951 or the classification notice in 1956, but if there was, it was harmless, for Allen was permitted without objection to testify about these documents, *539stating their contents, *Southern R. Co. v. Garner,*101 Ga. App. 371 (114 SE2d 211); *Williams v. Colonial Pipeline Co.,*109 Ga. App. 815, 816 (137 SE2d 667) and citations.

Error is assigned upon the charge of *Code*§ 79-402 relative to a situation where one resides indifferently at two or more places in the State. The evidence would have supported a finding that Allen resided in Fulton County or in Jefferson County, though it did not demand a finding of either. See *Knight v. Bond & Brother,*112 Ga. 828 (2) (38 SE 206); *Bellamy v. Bellamy,*187 Ga. 804, 805 (1) (2 SE2d 413). The charge was not error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
# C_2005296EN.01001601.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/16

---

Action brought on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-358/05)

(2005/C 296/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima and S. Pardo Qunitillán, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | declare that, by not having adopted all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC or, in any event, by having failed to give notice of such provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not having adopted all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC or, in any event, by having failed to give notice of such provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 30 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive should have been transposed into national law expired on 1 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 15.7.2002, p. 37.

1

---