alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006036EN.01001701.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/17

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-67/05: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/60/EC - Community action in the field of water policy - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 36/32)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-67/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker and S. Pardo Quintillán) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: U. Forsthoff) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 11 February 2005 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of J. Malenovský, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and A Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Federal Republic of Germany

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period, all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period, all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 02.04.2005

1

---
§ 415.105 Amounts of payment for physician services to beneficiaries in providers. ( a ) *General rule.* The carrier determines amounts of payment for physician services to beneficiaries in providers in accordance with the general rules governing the physician fee schedule payment in part 414 of this chapter, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Application in certain settings* — ( 1 ) *Teaching hospitals.* The carrier applies the rules in subpart D of this part (concerning physician services in teaching settings), in addition to those in this section, in determining whether fee schedule payment should be made for physician services to individual beneficiaries in a teaching hospital.
( 2 ) *Hospital-based ESRD facilities.* The carrier applies §§ 414.310 through 414.314 of this chapter, which set forth determination of reasonable charges under the ESRD program, to determine the amount of payment for physician services furnished to individual beneficiaries in a hospital-based ESRD facility approved under part 405 subpart U.
# C_2006071EN.01001201.xml

| 23.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4034 — Telenor/Vodafone Sverige)

(2006/C 71/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4034. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4034. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005281EN.01003201.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/32

---

Action brought on 16 September 2005 — Republic of Finland v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-350/05)

(2005/C 281/58)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant(s): Republic of Finland (represented by: Tuula Pynnä, Agent)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission's decision, dated 8 July 2005 and notified on the same day, refusing, contrary to the principle of loyal cooperation under Article 10 EC and to the case-law of the Court of Justice concerning conditional payments, to open negotiations with Finland on the conditional payment of the retroactive customs duties and default interest on them up to the date of payment demanded by the Commission from Finland in infringement proceedings 2003/2180 under Article 226 EC, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision, dated 8 July 2005 and notified on the same day, refusing, contrary to the principle of loyal cooperation under Article 10 EC and to the case-law of the Court of Justice concerning conditional payments, to open negotiations with Finland on the conditional payment of the retroactive customs duties and default interest on them up to the date of payment demanded by the Commission from Finland in infringement proceedings 2003/2180 under Article 226 EC, and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the contested decision the Commission considered that in the present case it was not under an obligation to act within the meaning of Article 232 EC. Finland had, in its letter under Article 232 EC, called on the Commission, under the principle of loyal cooperation under Article 10 EC and the case-law of the Court of Justice on conditional payments, to take a decision to enter into negotiations with Finland on the conditional payment, pending the decision of the Court of Justice in the case, of the disputed customs debt and the associated default interest.

Finland submits that by taking the contested decision the Commission infringed the EC Treaty or the legislation relating to its application within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 230 EC by refusing, contrary to the principle of loyal cooperation under Article 10 EC and the case-law of the Court of Justice on conditional payments, to start negotiations on the conditional payment of the retroactive customs duties and default interest on them up to the date of payment demanded by the Commission from Finland under Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 (1) in infringement proceedings 2003/2180, and by not giving reasons for the refusal contrary to Article 253 EC.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities' own resources, OJ L 130 of 31.5.2000, p. 1.

1

---
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 

16, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00366-CR

IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

232nd District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1604855 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On May 2, 2019, relator DeAndre DeBoest filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Josh Hill, 
2

presiding judge of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, to permit relator to 

proceed pro se in the underlying case. 

Relator asserts that he has filed at least nine motions to proceed pro se, has

demanded in open court that he be allowed to proceed pro se, and has refused to 

accept a court-appointed attorney. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must 

show that (1) the relator has no adequate remedy at law for obtaining the relief the 

relator seeks; and (2) what the relator seeks to compel involves a ministerial act 

rather than a discretionary act. In re Powell, 516 S.W.3d 488, 494–95 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2017). 

It is relator’s burden to provide a sufficient record to establish that relator is 

entitled to relief. See In re Henry, 525 S.W.3d 381, 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Bates, 65 S.W.3d 133, 135 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to do so. Relator did not file a 

record with his petition containing the motions he purportedly filed, any rulings on 

his motions, any other relevant documents filed in the trial court, or any record of 

the proceeding in which relator claims that he demanded in open court that the trial 

court allow him to proceed pro se. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. 

Relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, 

we deny his petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
- DipNote Home
- About
- All Posts
- Browse by Topic

HomeDipNote...DipNote by Topic

# 									DipNote by Topic							

		Subscribe		

## 								Browse by Topic							

        - Anti-Corruption & Transparency
        - Arms Control & Nonproliferation
        - Climate & Environment
        - Combating Drugs & Crime
        - Countering Terrorism
        - Cyber Issues
        - Economic Prosperity & Trade Policy
        - Education & Culture
        - Energy
        - Global Health
        - Global Women’s Issues
        - Human Rights & Democracy
        - Human Trafficking
        - International Development
        - Military & Security
        - Outreach
        - Refugee & Humanitarian Assistance
        - Science, Technology, & Innovation
        - This Week at State
        - Travel

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Former Belizean Minister John Birchman Saldivar for Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Designation of Former Belizean Minister John Birchman Saldivar for Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Office of the Spokesperson

November 15, 2022

The United States is designating former Belizean Minister John Birchman Saldivar for his involvement in significant corruption. Specifically, Saldivar accepted bribes for the improper acquisition of Belizean immigration documents and interfered in public processes for his personal benefit during his tenure as a government official.  Section 7031(c) provides that officials of foreign governments and their immediate family members about whom the Secretary of State has credible information of direct or indirect involvement in significant corruption, or a gross violation of human rights, are ineligible for entry into the United States.

Corrupt acts such as these undermine the integrity of Belize’s democratic institutions and fuel perceptions of corruption and impunity, diminishing confidence in governance.  As part of this action, the Department is also designating Saldivar’s immediate family members, Darlene Karen Saldivar, Johnelle Saldivar, Jevoughn Saldivar, and his minor child.

These designations reaffirm the commitment of the United States to combat corruption, which harms the public interest, hampers countries’ economic prosperity, and curtails the ability of governments to respond effectively to the needs of their people.  The United States continues to stand with all Belizeans in support of democracy and the rule of law and will continue to promote accountability for those who abuse public power for personal gain, regardless of their position or political affiliation.

Tags

7031(c)BelizeCorruptionCrimeOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomePhilippines

# Philippines

195 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea 	  Matthew MillerAugust 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Senior Official Murray to Participate in APEC-Related Meetings in Cebu, Philippines; Seoul, Republic of Korea; and Seattle, Washington	  July 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Philippines	  July 12, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Seventh Anniversary of the Philippines-China South China Sea Arbitral Tribunal Ruling	  Matthew MillerJuly 11, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 21, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 21, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Philippines	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Philippine National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 11, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Philippines, Singapore, and Indonesia	  May 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Philippines	  May 15, 2023 

previous page1…45678…20next page

Back to Top
No. 00-5919.

No. 00-5924.

#### Guiterrez-Rojas *v.*United States; and Gonzalez-Ochoa *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F. 3d 1160.
# Tajikistan

79 items

        -    Media Note  		B5+1 Forum	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Dushanbe, Tajikistan: QSI International School of Dushanbe: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Direct Line Event  		Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan	  February 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Inaugural C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue among the United States and Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Religious Freedom Designations	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 2 of 2	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Tajikistan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Dushanbe, Tajikistan: QSI International School of Dushanbe: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 6, 2023 
        -    DSS Articles  		ATA Partners with Interagency to Support All-Women Marksmanship Exchange Program in Tajikistan	  October 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Tajikistan Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 8, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### PESTCO EXTERMINATORS, INC. v. WILLIAM T. BURTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 9844.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 28, 1974.

*395A. J. Gray, III and Harry E. Barsh, Lake Charles, for Raffery and Burton Industries.

Allen M. Edwards, Plaquemine, for Collins.

Frederick Tulley, Baton Rouge, for in-tervenor-appellee.

Neal N. Bagwell, White Castle, for Pest-co.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and PICKETT, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This suit, which was consolidated with Collins v. Raffery, La.App., 304 So.2d 392, for trial, arises out of the same automobile accident therein described. Plaintiff herein is Pestco Exterminators, Inc., owner of one of the vehicles involved, and defendant is William T. Burton Industries, Inc., owner of the other vehicle. After trial on the merits, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $1,022.70, and defendant has appealed. Plaintiff has answered the appeal, asking for an increase in the award.

For reasons assigned in Collins v. Raf-fery, supra, we find the trial court properly found defendant to be liable. The only other issues presented are those raised in plaintiff’s answer to the appeal.

Plaintiff claims that it should have been awarded $1,000.00 rather than $900.00 for the value of its automobile; $199.50 for wrecker service and storage fees, rather than $50.00; and $850.00 for wages paid to its injured employee, James D. Collins, while he was unable to work.

Evidence in the record shows that the automobile had a NADA Blue Book value of $800.00. Plaintiff’s witness testified that the car was well maintained and therefore had a value of $1,000.00 The trial judge awarded $900.00, and we find no error in his conclusion, particularly in view of the fact that no allowance for salvage value was made in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff claims $199.50, $25.00 wrecker charges, $165.00 for 11 months storage, and $9.50 tax. The trial court awarded $50.00. Since plaintiff found out that the automobile was a total loss shortly after the accident, it is not entitled to storage charges after that time. The measure of its damages is the value of the vehicle. We think the $25.00 allowance for storage by the trial judge is more than generous.

Finally, plaintiff is seeking to recover $850.00 which it paid to Mr. Collins while he was unable to work. This claim was properly denied by the trial judge. *396An employer is entitled to recover only such amounts as he is legally obligated to pay the injured employee under the workmen’s compensation law. The $850.00 sought herein was voluntarily paid in addition to the compensation payments made by the insurer, and cannot be recovered. Chase v. Dunbar, 185 So.2d 563 (La.App. 1 Cir.1966).

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, at defendant’s cost.

Affirmed.
# C_2005283EN.01001801.xml

| 16.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/18

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2005/C 283/07)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the EUR 2 denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Vatican City State

Subject of commemoration: 20th World Youth Day held in Cologne in August 2005

Factual description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a representation of the Cathedral of Cologne with a comet in the upper part of the design. The words ‘XX GIORNATA MONDIALE DELLA GIOVENTU'’ form a quasi-semicircle along the upper edge of the inner part, interrupted by the tail of the comet and one of the church spires. Twelve stars in a quasi-semicircle appear on the upper part of the outer ring. At the top, within the outer ring, the year of mintage (2005) and the mintmark ‘R’ are inserted between the stars. On the lower part of the outer ring the words ‘CITTA' DEL VATICANO’ form a semicircle.

Issue volume: 100 000 coins

Approximate issue period: December 2005

Edge lettering: 2 *, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, pp. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

2

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-93538, 33-41453, 33-48646, 33-77080, 333-4620 and 333-31753 on Forms S-8 of
Somanetics Corporation of our report dated January 9, 1998 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to an
uncertainty concerning the Company's ability to continue as a going concern),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Somanetics Corporation for the
year ended November 30, 1997.



/S/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
January 28, 1998
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Denmark’s Constitution Day

# 									Denmark’s Constitution Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 5, 2021

On behalf of the Government of the United States, I send congratulations to the people of Denmark as you celebrate the anniversary of the signing of the Danish Constitution.

The United States and the Kingdom of Denmark have enjoyed 220 years of unbroken diplomatic relations based on democratic values and mutual commitments to peace, security, and human rights around the world.  As a friend and ally, the United States appreciates Denmark’s commitment to our shared security, as demonstrated through its leadership of the NATO Mission in Iraq, its contributions to the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, and our common efforts to adapt NATO to meet current and future security challenges.  The United States looks forward to continuing our strong partnership with the Kingdom of Denmark, including Greenland and the Faroe Islands, in the Arctic Council, and other dialogues.  We also applaud Denmark’s ambition and actions to tackle the climate crisis, foster scientific collaboration, and accelerate the green transition by identifying opportunities for increased cooperation in clean energy research and development.

Thank you for the warm welcome during my recent visit to the Kingdom of Denmark, and best wishes for a joyful Constitution Day.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDenmarkHuman ResourcesNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top