alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000726315
<NAME> DEAN WITTER REALTY INCOME PARTNERSHIP I, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,684,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,649,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,633,977<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,188,327<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,633,977<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,069,972<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,544,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             8,510,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,073,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,073,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,073,347)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (78.31)<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $35,631,168, investment in joint venture of $8,402,653 and
net deferred leasing commissions of $266,329.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$725,149, and other liabilities of $6,720,501.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $1,858,302, equity in earnings of joint
venture of $158,422, and interest and other revenue of $53,248.
<F5>Represents net loss per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), whose signature appears below hereby appoints Todd
B. Barnum or William C. Niegsch, Jr., or either of them, as his or her
attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report") for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2005, and likewise to sign and
file any and all amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual
Report, and the Company hereby also appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and
behalf, each such person and the Company hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 10th day of
January, 2006.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                               TITLE
---------                               -----
<S>                                     <C>


/s/ Todd B. Barnum                      Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
-------------------------------------   Director
    Todd B. Barnum


/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.             Executive Vice President, Chief
-------------------------------------   Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary
    William C. Niegsch, Jr.             and Director


/s/ William E. Arthur                   Director
-------------------------------------
    William E. Arthur


/s/ Thomas R. Green                     Director
-------------------------------------
    Thomas R. Green


/s/ Robert A. Rothman                   Director
-------------------------------------
    Robert A. Rothman


/s/ Michael D. Murphy                   Director
-------------------------------------
    Michael D. Murphy


/s/ Timothy C. Robinson                 Director
-------------------------------------
    Timothy C. Robinson
</TABLE>
#### Rosa Lee RANKIN, Appellant, v. George F. RANKIN, Appellee.

No. 73-823.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 23, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Charles RUSSELL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52396.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Perry E. Brown, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; William F. Coleman, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and HAWKINS, JJ., concur.
# C_2006022EN.01001701.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Action brought on 9 November 2005 — Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-404/05)

(2006/C 22/32)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: Nikolaos Korogiannakis and Nikolaos Keramidas, lawyers, assisted by Maria Tassopoulou)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2005) 3243 of 1 September 2005 on the reduction of assistance granted by the Cohesion Fund for Project No 95/09/65/040 (New Athens International Airport at Spata) on the basis of Commission Decision C(96) 1356 of 24 May 1996; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2005) 3243 of 1 September 2005 on the reduction of assistance granted by the Cohesion Fund for Project No 95/09/65/040 (New Athens International Airport at Spata) on the basis of Commission Decision C(96) 1356 of 24 May 1996;

| — | order the Commission to refund, with interest at the statutory rate, the sum paid by the Hellenic Republic, which corresponds to the reduction in assistance; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to refund, with interest at the statutory rate, the sum paid by the Hellenic Republic, which corresponds to the reduction in assistance;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested decision, the Commission sought the reimbursement, as wrongly paid, of the sum of EUR 12 781 410, invoking irregularities with regard to the financial assistance of the Cohesion Fund for the Project ‘New Athens International Airport at Spata’.

The Hellenic Republic seeks annulment of the decision, submitting that it was not adopted within the time-limit laid down by Article 18(3) of Regulation No 1386/2002 and Article H of Annex II to Regulation No 1164/1994.

In the alternative, the Hellenic Republic disputes the Commission's assessment that account was not taken of a sum amounting to EUR 48 000 000 in respect of air navigation equipment. It further submits that, by imposing a correction of 2 % for an alleged failure to observe adequately the prescribed publicity measures, the Commission impermissibly applied Decision 455/96 retroactively to the project which, since it preceded that decision, was not subject to it. The Hellenic Republic submits, finally, that the correction in question infringes the principle of proportionality and is unlawful and unjustified.

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOverview of Microgravity Combustion Research at NASA Lewis Research Center and its Potential Commercial ImpactThe near-zero (microgravity) environment of orbiting spacecraft minimizes buoyant flows, greatly simplifying combustion processes and isolating important phenomena ordinarily concealed by the overwhelming gravity-driven forces and flows. Fundamental combustion understanding has greatly benefited from analyses and experiments conducted in the microgravity environment. Because of the economic and commercial importance of combustion in practice, there is strong motivation to seek wider applications for the microgravity-combustion findings. This paper reviews selected technology developments to illustrate some emerging applications. Topics cover improved fire-safety technology in spacecraft and terrestrial systems, innovative combustor designs for aerospace and ground propulsion, applied sensors and controls for combustion processes, and self-sustaining synthesis techniques for advanced materials.Document ID19970009350Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLyons, Valerie*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Friedman, Robert*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107353E-10506NASA-TM-107353Meeting InformationMeeting: Space Technology and Applications International ForumLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 26, 1997End Date: January 30, 1997Sponsors:Department of Energy,Air Force Center for Studies and Analyses,NASA Headquarters,Defense Nuclear AgencyAccession Number97N14839Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 962-22-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009350.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), whose signature appears below hereby
appoints Todd B. Barnum or William C. Niegsch, Jr., or either of them, as his or
her attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report") for the fiscal year ended October 27, 2002, and likewise to sign and
file any and all amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual
Report, and the Company hereby also appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and
behalf, each such person and the Company hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 8th day of
January, 2003.

<Table>
<Caption>
Signature                                                     Title
---------                                                     -----
<S>                                                           <C>
*/s/ Todd B. Barnum                                           Chairman, President, Chief Executive
----------------------------------                            Officer and Director
     Todd B. Barnum

*/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.                                  Executive Vice President, Chief
----------------------------------                            Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary,
     William C. Niegsch, Jr.                                  and Director

*/s/ Mark F. Emerson                                          Chief Operating Officer and Director
----------------------------------
     Mark F. Emerson

*/s/ William E. Arthur                                        Director
----------------------------------
     William E. Arthur

*/s/ Thomas R. Green                                          Director
----------------------------------
     Thomas R. Green

*/s/ Robert A. Rothman                                        Director
----------------------------------
     Robert A. Rothman

*/s/ Roger D. Blackwell                                       Director
----------------------------------
     Roger D. Blackwell

*/s/ Michael D. Murphy                                        Director
----------------------------------
     Michael D. Murphy
</Table>
#### Cliff B. HARRIS v. The BOARD OF WATER AND SEWER COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF MOBILE, a Public Corporation.

77-472.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 26, 1979.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1979.

Joseph J. Boswell, Mobile, for appellant.

W. Michael Atchison, Birmingham, for appellee.

JONES, Justice.

Affirmed on the authority of ARCP 51. See also, *Odom v. Linsey,*365 So.2d 664 (Ala.1978) 13 A.B.R. 283, and cases cited therein.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 98-10701

______________________

RONALD B. MOORE

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT HARRIS, Sheriff; ET AL

Defendants,

ROBERT HARRIS, Sheriff; ERNESTO GARZA, JR., Deputy;

KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

(3:97-CV-1418)

_________________________________________

April 20, 1999

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, and concluding that the defendant deputy

had qualified immunity because there was no violation of clearly established law (see Taylor

v. Gregg, 36 F.3d 453 (5th Cir. 1994), and Hand v. Gary, 838 F.2d 1420 (5th Cir. 1988), which,

although in tension with Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), concerning the effect to be given

a search warrant for claims against officers initiating an arrest, reflect no violation of clearly

established law); and concluding further that there is no material fact issues as to the other

claims under federal law, and that judgment as a matter of law on those claims was proper
2

against the plaintiff, the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3232 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3232

      To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
  preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) requirement for 
             nursing facilities under the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 1996

 Mr. Ehrlich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
  preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) requirement for 
             nursing facilities under the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PREADMISSION SCREENING AND RESIDENT REVIEW 
              (PASARR) REQUIREMENTS FOR MENTALLY-ILL INDIVIDUALS 
              ADMITTED TO NURSING FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1919 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396r) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (F) of subsection (b)(3);
            (2) in subsection (b)(6), by striking ``, as well as the 
        results of any pre-admission screening conducted under 
        subsection (e)(7)'';
            (3) in subsection (c)(2)(B)(iii)--
                    (A) by adding ``and'' at the end of subclause (II),
                    (B) by striking ``; and'' at the end of subclause 
                (III) and inserting a period, and
                    (C) by striking subclause (IV);
            (4) by striking paragraph (7) of subsection (e);
            (5) by striking paragraph (8) of subsection (f); and
            (6) by redesignating paragraph (9) of subsection (f) as 
        paragraph (8).
    (b) Effective Date.--(1) The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to admissions to nursing facilities occurring on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
    (2) The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall promulgate 
such regulations (on an interim final or similar basis) as may be 
required to carry out the amendments made by this section on a timely 
basis.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         224,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,515
<INVENTORY>                                     28,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,419
<PP&E>                                         650,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,588,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,835
<BONDS>                                        373,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           453
<OTHER-SE>                                     649,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,588,709
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,550,642
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,395,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    984
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<FN>
<F1>America West Airlines, Inc. emerged from bankruptcy on August 25, 1994
and adopted fresh starting reporting in accordance with Statement of Position
90-7. Accordingly, the Company's post-reorganization financial
statements have not been prepared on a consistent basis with such
pre-reorganization financial statements and are not comparable in all respects
to financial statements prior to reorganization.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
FYI-TVA request for extension.

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 06/28/2010 02:59PM -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Johnson, Linden Pr intz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov>

Date: 06/23/2010 03:31PM

cc: "Johnson, Linden Prin tz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov>

Subject: Request for partial ex tension of the ICR deadline

Dear Ms. Jezebele,

Please consider this request for an extension of the ICR deadline for certain TVA

facilities. I appreciate your assistance on this and look forward to your response. If

you have any questions about our request, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Lindy Johnson

Lindy Johnson, Manager

Water Permits and Compliance

1101 Market Street, LP 5D

Chattanooga, TN 37402

lpjohnson@tva.gov

(423) 751-3361 office

(423) 751-7011 fax Pa g e 1 of 1

2/23/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28B95AD

...
# C_2006086EN.01001903.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/19

---

Action brought on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

(Case C-94/06)

(2006/C 86/37)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Amparo Alcover San Pedro and B. Schima, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the assessment and management of environmental noise or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/49/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the assessment and management of environmental noise or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1) of that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2002/49 into national law expired on 18 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 189, 18.7.2002, p. 12.

1

---