alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary McKeon Travels to Miami, Florida

# 									Deputy Secretary McKeon Travels to Miami, Florida							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 29, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian P. McKeon will travel to Miami, Florida, March 29-30.  The Deputy Secretary will visit State Department operations in South Florida, including the Miami Passport Agency and the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Miami Field Office.  The Deputy Secretary will also connect with local university and business communities in South Florida.  He will visit Florida International University, as part of continued efforts to engage with diverse students on U.S foreign policy priorities and careers with the State Department.  Deputy Secretary McKeon will then speak at the University of Miami to a group of local and international students, as well as State Department exchange program participants.  He will also address a group of local business leaders at an event organized by the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce.  Finally, he will visit the U.S. Southern Command and meet with Commanding General Laura J. Richardson.

Tags

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesFloridaOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.500 Basis and scope.

This subpart implements provisions of 1833(h)(8) of the Act and 1834A of the Act—procedures for determining the basis for, and amount of, payment for a clinical diagnostic laboratory test (CDLT).

[81 FR 41098, June 23, 2016]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Cook Islands Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Hermann

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Cook Islands Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Hermann							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

September 14, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman met yesterday with Cook Islands Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Tepaeru Hermann at the Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders in Honolulu, Hawaii.  The two discussed the recent elections in the Cook Islands, regional challenges, and the important role of the Pacific Islands Forum.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCook IslandsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### In the Interest of S. V., a minor.

No. 73-932.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 24, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 402.300 Request for reinstatement. ( a ) An excluded person may submit a written request for reinstatement to the initiating agency no sooner than 120 days prior to the terminal date of exclusion as specified in the notice of exclusion. The written request for reinstatement must include documentation demonstrating that the person has met the standards set forth in § 402.302. Obtaining or reactivating a Medicare provider number (or equivalent) does not constitute reinstatement.
( b ) Upon receipt of a written request for reinstatement, the initiating agency may require the person to furnish additional, specific information, and authorization to obtain information from private health insurers, peer review organizations, and others as necessary to determine whether reinstatement is granted.
( c ) Failure to submit a written request for reinstatement or to furnish the required information or authorization results in the continuation of the exclusion, unless the exclusion has been in effect for 5 years. In this case, reinstatement is automatic.
( d ) If a period of exclusion is reduced on appeal (regardless of whether further appeal is pending), the excluded person may request and apply for reinstatement within 120 days of the expiration of the reduced exclusion period. A written request for the reinstatement includes the same standards as noted in paragraph (b) of this section.
# C_2005315EN.01001201.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/12

---

Action brought on 13 September 2005 — Ott and Others v Commission

(Case T-349/05)

(2005/C 315/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Martial Ott (Oberanven, Luxembourg), Fernando Lopez Tola (Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), Francis Weiler (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the list of officials promoted in 2004 (1), since that list does not include the names of the applicants, and, as an incidental plea, that the Court should annul the travaux preparatoires of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the list of officials promoted in 2004 (1), since that list does not include the names of the applicants, and, as an incidental plea, that the Court should annul the travaux preparatoires of that decision;

1

| — | in the alternative, annul the allocation of promotion points for 2004, in particular, further to the recommendations made by the Promotion Committees; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the allocation of promotion points for 2004, in particular, further to the recommendations made by the Promotion Committees;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas relied on by the applicants are identical to those relied on by the applicants in Case T-327/05.

---

(1)  List published in Administrative Notice No 130, 30.11.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21
                                
                Subsidiaries of EnergyNorth, Inc.
                                

EnergyNorth, Inc., incorporated in the state of New Hampshire,
has 100% ownership of the common stock of the following:


Broken Bridge Corporation, 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Propane, Inc., 75 Regional Drive, Concord, New Hampshire.

EnergyNorth Realty, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.

ENI Resources, Inc., 1260 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.



_______________
All of the above companies are incorporated in the state of New Hampshire.
#### Mary S. REBACK, Appellant, v. Ralph REBACK, Appellee.

No. 79-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 6, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1979.

Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson & Greer and Bradford V. Swing, Miami, for appellant.

Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin and Phillip Schiff, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We find that the order under review was entered both in full compliance with our prior decision in this case, *Reback v. Reback,*296 So.2d 541 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), and within the sound discretion of the trial court. *Herzog v. Herzog,*346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976). In its entirety, the order is accordingly.

Affirmed.
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsRemarks & Releases...Department of State and DLA Piper Partner To Prevent Abuses in Domestic Work Globally

# 									Department of State and DLA Piper Partner To Prevent Abuses in Domestic Work Globally							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Since 2013, the U.S. Department of State’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (TIP Office) and New Perimeter, DLA Piper’s nonprofit affiliate that provides long-term pro bono legal assistance in under-served regions around the world, have maintained a public-private partnership to increase the availability of pro-bono legal resources and tools to combat human trafficking.

The public-private partnership, announced on April 9, 2013, reflects the partners’ shared interest in seeking opportunities for collaboration that fit within each organization’s respective vision, mission, and program focus, and is dedicated to increasing the availability of pro bono resources and training for legal professionals to ensure they have the tools to address this crime and support survivors. This partnership brings together the anti-trafficking expertise and knowledge of the TIP Office with the breadth of legal skills and resources of DLA Piper. The TIP Office is well positioned to identify countries, issues, or regions that could benefit from pro bono legal services and engage interested governments and nongovernmental organizations to promote partnership initiatives. While New Perimeter is able to provide pro bono legal assistance primarily in the developing and post-conflict world, drawing on the skills and talents of more than 4,200 DLA Piper lawyers globally. To maximize impact, New Perimeter is able to draw upon the skills of teams of lawyers in the field and work alongside its partners. The key outcomes and products developed from this partnership will serve the global anti-trafficking community – from NGOs to foreign governments – to help combat human trafficking internationally.

On June 30, 2016, the partners announced the creation of a package of model documents to help prevent the global problem of abuses in domestic work. Grounded in international law, the documents set forth clear standards for the protection of domestic workers whose employment in private homes increases their vulnerability and isolation. The first pair of documents is a model contract and addendum for domestic workers to use with their employers. The third is a memorandum of understanding between countries sending and receiving migrant domestic workers.

### Relevant Documents and Links

        - Model Contract of Employment  [Word.doc format]
        - Model Addendum to Contract of Employment  [Word.doc format]
        - Model Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Best Practices in the Employment of Domestic Workers  [Word.doc format]
        - Employers of A-3 and G-5 domestic workers in the United States are encouraged to use the employment contract template developed by the Department of State and available  here .

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 25, 2024

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt M. Campbell met today with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis in Washington.  Deputy Secretary Campbell thanked Foreign Minister Landsbergis for Lithuania’s continued engagement with likeminded democratic partners in the Indo-Pacific.  They also discussed how events in the Indo-Pacific affect the Euro-Atlantic region and elaborated their respective strategies with regard to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).  They affirmed the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.  Finally, Deputy Secretary Campbell highlighted support for Lithuania amid continued coercive measures by the PRC.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateLithuaniaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### Isiah WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. BRANNEN PRESTRESS CO., INC., et al., Appellee.

No. XX-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1981.

Ivan Matusek, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jeffrey R. Fuller of Williams, Brasfield, & Wertz, P. A., of St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant presents the following points in this workers’ compensation appeal: (1) that the deputy erred in failing to award penalties; (2) that the deputy erred in failing to make a finding regarding claimant’s alleged psychiatric disability; (3) that the deputy erred in not finding claimant permanently and totally disabled; and (4) that the deputy erred in denying claimant’s motion to present additional evidence.

In his order, the deputy commissioner discusses the evidence regarding claimant’s alleged psychiatric disability and, in fact, appears to agree that there is a psychiatric component to the disability. However, in an otherwise detailed order, he makes no specific ultimate findings on this issue. Therefore, we find it necessary to remand on this issue for the deputy to decide whether, and to what extent, claimant has a psychiatric disability.

The deputy also erred in failing to award penalties due to the carrier’s belated payment of certain compensation benefits, for Section 440.20(5), Florida Statutes (1977) provides:

> *1126If any installment of compensation payable without an award is not paid within 14 days after it become due, . . . there *shall*be added to such unpaid installment an amount equal to 10% thereof .... (emphasis supplied)

While there are several statutory exceptions to this general rule, none are applicable to this situation.

We have considered the remaining points on appeal and find them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
#### James Edward MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1975.

Nelson E. Bailey of Bailey & Brown, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The factual matters involved in the criminal proceeding resulting in defendant’s conviction for grand larceny and the instant appeal are identical to those considered by this court in *Jarriel v. State,*317 So.2d 141, Fourth District Court of Appeal, opinion filed August 8, 1975. In that case this court found that a statement made by defendant Jarriel during interrogation was the result of “direct or implied promises ... in violation of the basic tenet of law that a confessing defendant should be entirely free from the influence of hope or fear”. Accordingly and for those reasons set forth in *Jarriel v. State,*supra, the statement of defendant Mills should be suppressed.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
§ 24.1 Establishment, number of members, and purpose. ( a ) There is established in the Public Health Service the Silvio O. Conte Senior Biomedical Research and Biomedical Product Assessment Service (SBRBPAS or Service) consisting of members the maximum number of which is prescribed by law. The purpose of the Service is to recruit and retain outstanding and qualified scientific and technical experts in the fields of biomedical research, clinical research evaluation, and biomedical product assessment.
( b ) The Secretary may not use the authority in paragraph (a) of this section to reduce the number of employees serving in any other employment system to offset the number of members within the Service.
#### § 137.443 Is the recommended decision always final?

No, any party to the appeal may file precise and specific written objections to the recommended decision, or any other comments, within 15 days of receiving the recommended decision. The objecting party must serve a copy of its objections on the other party. The recommended decision will become final 15 days after the Self-Governance Tribe receives the ALJs recommended decision, unless a written statement of objections is filed with the Secretary during the 15-day period. If no party files a written statement of objections within 15 days, the recommended decision will become final.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended February 25, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris               
|Nicholas Konidaris                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: March 22, 2006                

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 405.1063 Applicability of laws, regulations, CMS Rulings, and precedential decisions. ( a ) All laws and regulations pertaining to the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including, but not limited to Titles XI, XVIII, and XIX of the Social Security Act and applicable implementing regulations, are binding on ALJs and attorney adjudicators, and the Council.
( b ) CMS Rulings are published under the authority of the Administrator, CMS. Consistent with § 401.108 of this chapter, rulings are binding on all CMS components, on all HHS components that adjudicate matters under the jurisdiction of CMS, and on the Social Security Administration to the extent that components of the Social Security Administration adjudicate matters under the jurisdiction of CMS.
( c ) Precedential decisions designated by the Chair of the Departmental Appeals Board in accordance with § 401.109 of this chapter, are binding on all CMS components, all HHS components that adjudicate matters under the jurisdiction of CMS, and on the Social Security Administration to the extent that components of the Social Security Administration adjudicate matters under the jurisdiction of CMS.
[82 FR 5121, Jan. 17, 2017]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Latvian Prime Minister Silina

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Latvian Prime Minister Silina							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 14, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met today with Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina in Washington.  Deputy Secretary Campbell expressed appreciation for Latvia’s contributions to the NATO Alliance over the last 20 years and discussed preparations for the July NATO Summit in Washington. The Deputy Secretary thanked the Prime Minister for Latvia’s steadfast support for Ukraine and commitment to our shared democratic values. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Prime Minister Silina agreed on the importance of engaging Indo-Pacific partners.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsLatviaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), whose signature appears below hereby appoints Todd
B. Barnum or William C. Niegsch, Jr., or either of them, as his or her
attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report") for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004, and likewise to sign and
file any and all amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual
Report, and the Company hereby also appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and
behalf, each such person and the Company hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 11th day of
January, 2005.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                          Title
---------                                          -----
<S>                                      <C>
*/s/Todd B. Barnum                       Chairman, President, Chief
------------------                       Executive Officer and Director
    Todd B. Barnum

*/s/William C. Niegsch, Jr.              Executive Vice President, Chief
---------------------------              Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary
    William C. Niegsch, Jr.              and Director

*/s/William E. Arthur                    Director
---------------------
    William E. Arthur

*/s/Thomas R. Green                      Director
-------------------
    Thomas R. Green

*/s/Robert A. Rothman                    Director
---------------------
    Robert A. Rothman

*/s/Michael D. Murphy                    Director
---------------------
    Michael D. Murphy

*/s/Timothy C. Robinson                  Director
-----------------------
    Timothy C. Robinson
</TABLE>
699 A.2d 727

#### Daniel E. SHOPE and Shonna L. Shope, his wife, Petitioners, v. Perry A. EAGLE, M.D. and New York Hospital, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 3, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issues:

1. Whether prejudice to a defendant needs to be demonstrated to justify termination of a case pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. 1901 and York County Rule 6035, and if so, whether the requisite prejudice has been established in this case?

2. Whether a case may be terminated pursuant to Pa. R.J.A.1901 and York County Rule 6035 if delay is attributable to a defendant, and if not, whether Respondents’ conduct precludes termination in this case?
Order entered May 9 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00439

- CV

IN RE AVI ADELMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 10604



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
#### Thaddis B. SUTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 10, 1982.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, the violation of condition (4) is stricken from the order of revocation of probation. This condition prohibits appellant from possessing a weapon or firearm, and there was no evidence produced to show that appellant had actual possession of any firearm.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.