45660 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Notices 

5. Action Matrix 

An Action Matrix would be 

developed to provide guidance to 

ensure consistent regulatory response 

for a given level of licensee 

performance. The matrix would be 

categorized into four areas (meeting 

between NRC and Licensee Senior 

Management, licensee action, NRC 

inspection, and regulatory action) and 

would be graded across a range of 

licensee performance. The NRC’s 

decision to take an action beyond 

baseline inspection and oversight would 

be a direct result of performance 

indicators, if available, or inspection 

findings that crossed defined 

thresholds. If licensee performance 

declines, more significant actions would 

be considered. 

What should the NRC consider in the 

development of an Action Matrix? 

Would the use of the Action Matrix and 

underlying decision logic be an 

appropriate approach to NRC and 

licensee action? 

6. Other Comments 

Are there any other comments related 

to the oversight framework, 

cornerstones, performance indicators, or 

thresholds? 

B. Risk-Informed Baseline Inspections 

The baseline inspection program 

would be based on a set of inspectable 

areas that, in conjunction with the 

performance indicators, if available, 

would provide enough information for 

the NRC to determine whether the 

objectives of each cornerstone of safety 

or security are being met. This baseline 

inspection program would be the 

minimum inspection at each facility. 

The baseline inspection could be 

different for different types of facilities 

that have different potential risks (for 

example low enriched uranium 

processing versus high enriched 

uranium processing). 

Are there any other factors that 

should be considered in defining the 

baseline inspection program? Are there 

any other comments related to the 

baseline inspection program? 

C. Assessment Process 

1. Frequency of Assessments 

The revised oversight process would 

provide for continuous, semi-annual, 

annual, and biennial reviews of licensee 

performance. The resulting assessment 

would be based on licensee 

performance, as measured by 

performance indicators, if available, and 

inspection program results, as compared 

against an Action Matrix. The 

semiannual and annual assessments 

would also include inspection planning. 

Would this frequency of conducting 

assessments be appropriate to maintain 

a current assessment of licensee 

performance? 

2. Communicating Assessment Results 

The revised oversight would include 

several methods for communicating 

information to licensees and the public. 

First, the information being assessed 

(performance indicator and inspection 

results) would be made public as the 

information becomes available. Second, 

the NRC would send each licensee a 

letter at a defined frequency (e.g., every 

six months) that provides the NRC’s 

assessment of licensee performance and 

describes the NRC’s oversight of the 

facility. In addition, the letter would 

outline any changes to the NRC’s 

planned inspections for the upcoming 

18 months. Third, the NRC would hold 

an annual public meeting with each 

licensee to discuss its performance. 

Would these methods of 

communication provide sufficient 

opportunity for licensees and the public 

to gain an understanding of performance 

and interact with the NRC? 

3. Other Comments 

Are there any other comments related 

to the proposed assessment process? 

D. Implementation 

1. Transition Plan 

A transition plan that identifies 

important activities needed to complete 

and implement the potential processes 

would have to be developed. 

Are there major activities that if not 

accomplished could prevent successful 

implementation of the potential 

processes? 

2. Other Comments 

Are there any other comments related 

to implementing the new processes? 

E. Additional Comments 

In addition to the previously 

mentioned issues, commenters are 

invited to give any other views on the 

NRC assessment process that could 

assist the NRC in improving its 

effectiveness. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 21st day 

of August 2009. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Marissa G. Bailey, 

Director, Special Projects and Technical 

Support Directorate, Division of Fuel Cycle 

Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear 

Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. E9–21278 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. IC–28892] 

Notice of Applications for 

Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the 

Investment Company Act of 1940 

August 28, 2009. 

The following is a notice of 

applications for deregistration under 

section 8(f) of the Investment Company 

Act of 1940 for the month of August, 

2009. A copy of each application may be 

obtained via the Commission’s Web site 

by searching for the file number, or an 

applicant using the Company name box, 

at http://www.sec.gov/search/ 

search.htm or by calling (202) 551– 

8090. An order granting each 

application will be issued unless the 

SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons 

may request a hearing on any 

application by writing to the SEC’s 

Secretary at the address below and 

serving the relevant applicant with a 

copy of the request, personally or by 

mail. Hearing requests should be 

received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on 

September 22, 2009, and should be 

accompanied by proof of service on the 

applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, 

for lawyers, a certificate of service. 

Hearing requests should state the nature 

of the writer’s interest, the reason for the 

request, and the issues contested. 

Persons who wish to be notified of a 

hearing may request notification by 

writing to the Secretary, U.S. Securities 

and Exchange Commission, 100 F 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549– 

1090. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Diane L. Titus at (202) 551–6810, SEC, 

Division of Investment Management, 

Office of Investment Company 

Regulation, 100 F Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20549–4041. 

Dreman Claymore Global Dividend & 

Income Fund [File No. 811–21557] 

Fiduciary/Claymore Energy & 

Infrastructure Fund [File No. 811– 

21810] Claymore/Zacks Quantitative 

Growth & Income Fund [File No. 811– 

21925] Claymore/Voyageur Income & 

Opportunities Fund [File No. 811– 

22076] 

Summary: Each applicant, a closedend investment company, seeks an 

order declaring that it has ceased to be 

an investment company. Applicants 

have never made a public offering of 

their securities and do not propose to 

make a public offering or engage in 

business of any kind. 

Filing Dates: The applications were 

filed on June 10, 2009, and amended on 

August 14, 2009. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Notices 45661 

Applicants’ Address: 2455 Corporate 

West Dr., Lisle, IL 60532. 

Keystone High Income Bond Fund B–4 

[File No. 811–95] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

December 22, 1997, applicant 

transferred its assets to Evergreen High 

Yield Bond Fund, a series of Evergreen 

Fixed Income Trust, based on net asset 

value. Expenses incurred in connection 

with the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 12, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

26th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. 

Keystone Growth & Income Fund S–1 

[File No. 811–98] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

December 22, 1997, applicant 

transferred its assets to Evergreen Blue 

Chip Fund, a series of Evergreen Equity 

Trust, based on net asset value. 

Expenses incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 12, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

26th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. 

Keystone Government Securities Fund 

[File No. 811–4949] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about July 

31, 1997, applicant transferred its assets 

to Evergreen U.S. Government Fund, a 

series of Evergreen Investment Trust, 

based on net asset value. Expenses 

incurred in connection with the 

reorganization were paid by applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 5, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

Boston, MA 02116. 

Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus 

Municipal Bond Fund [File No. 811– 

21222] 

Summary: Applicant, a closed-end 

investment company, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On December 15, 

2008, applicant transferred its assets to 

Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond 

Fund, based on net asset value. 

Applicant’s auction preferred shares 

were redeemed prior to the 

reorganization. Expenses of $212,904 

incurred in connection with the 

reorganization were paid by applicant 

and the acquiring fund. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on July 24, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: Two 

International Place, Boston, MA 02110. 

Pioneer Interest Shares [File No. 811– 

2239] 

Summary: Applicant, a closed-end 

investment company, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On October 19, 

2007, applicant transferred its assets to 

Pioneer Bond Fund, based on net asset 

value. Expenses of approximately 

$190,894 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant and Pioneer Investment 

Management, Inc., applicant’s 

investments adviser. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on July 27, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 60 State St., 

Boston, MA 02109. 

Keystone Fund for Total Return [File 

No. 811–4950] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

December 22, 1997, applicant 

transferred its assets to Keystone Fund 

for Total Return, a series of Evergreen 

Equity Trust, based on net asset value. 

Expenses incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on July 30, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

Boston, MA 02116. 

Keystone Institutional Trust [File No. 

811–7441] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

December 22, 1997, applicant 

transferred its assets to Evergreen Select 

Small Cap Growth Fund, a series of 

Evergreen Select Equity Trust, based on 

net asset value. Expenses incurred in 

connection with the reorganization were 

paid by applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 13, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

26th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. 

Keystone Global Opportunities Fund 

[File No. 811–5404] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

January 13, 1998, applicant transferred 

its assets to Keystone Global 

Opportunities Fund, a series of 

Evergreen International Trust, based on 

net asset value. Expenses incurred in 

connection with the reorganization were 

paid by applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 4, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

Boston, MA 02116. 

Allstate Financial Investment Trust 

[File No. 811–22165] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On June 30, 2009, 

applicant made a liquidating 

distribution to its shareholders, based 

on net asset value. Expenses of $4,500 

incurred in connection with the 

liquidation were paid by Allstate 

Investment Advisors, LLC, applicant’s 

investment adviser. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 13, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 3100 Sanders 

Rd., Suite J5B, Northbrook, IL 60062– 

7154. 

Keystone Institutional Adjustable Rate 

Fund [File No. 811–6412] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On or about 

December 22, 1997, applicant 

transferred its assets to Evergreen Select 

Adjustable Rate Fund, a series of 

Evergreen Select Fixed Income Trust, 

based on net asset value. Expenses 

incurred in connection with the 

reorganization were paid by applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on August 13, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 200 Berkeley St., 

26th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. 

RMR F.I.R.E. Fund [File No. 811–21616] 

Summary: Applicant, a closed-end 

investment company, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On June 18, 2009, 

applicant transferred its assets to RMR 

Real Estate Income Fund, based on net 

asset value. Each holder of applicant’s 

preferred shares received preferred 

shares of RMR Real Estate Income Fund 

having an aggregate liquidation 

preference equal to the aggregate 

liquidation preference attributable to 

applicant’s preferred shares. Expenses 

of $141,011 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on June 19, 2009, and amended on 

August 12, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 400 Centre St., 

Newton, MA 02458. 

RMR Preferred Dividend Fund [File No. 

811–21671] 

Summary: Applicant, a closed-end 

investment company, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On June 23, 2009, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
45662 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 170 / Thursday, September 3, 2009 / Notices 

1See letter from Peter G. Armstrong, NYSE Arca, 

to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated 

June 24, 2009; letter from Michael Babel, NYSE 

Amex, to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, 

Commission, dated June 24, 2009; letter from 

Michael J. Simon, ISE, to Elizabeth Murphy, 

Secretary, Commission, dated July 1, 2009; letter 

from Edward J. Joyce, CBOE, to Elizabeth Murphy, 

Secretary, Commission, dated July 1, 2009; letter 

from Maura A. Looney, Associate Vice President, 

BX, to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, Commission, 

dated July 6, 2009; letter from Richard S. Rudolph, 

Assistant General Counsel, Phlx, to Elizabeth 

Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated July 16, 

2009; and letter from Jeffrey S. Davis, Vice 

President and Deputy General Counsel, Nasdaq, to 

Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated 

July 17, 2009. 

2On July 28, 2000, the Commission approved a 

national market system plan for the purpose of 

creating and operating an intermarket options 

market linkage proposed by the American Stock 

Exchange LLC (n/k/a NYSE Amex), CBOE, and ISE. 

See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43086 

(July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4, 2000). 

Subsequently, Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. 

(n/k/a Phlx), Pacific Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE 

Arca), Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a BX), and 

Nasdaq joined the Linkage Plan. See Securities 

Exchange Act Release Nos. 43573 (November 16, 

2000), 65 FR 70851 (November 28, 2000); 43574 

(November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70850 (November 28, 

2000); 49198 (February 5, 2004), 69 FR 7029 

(February 12, 2004); and 57545 (March 21, 2008), 

73 FR 16394 (March 27, 2008). 

3See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60360 

(July 21, 2009), 74 FR 37265 (‘‘Notice’’). 

4The facilities manager of the Linkage Plan is the 

Options Clearing Corporation. 

applicant transferred its assets to RMR 

Real Estate Income Fund, based on net 

asset value. Each holder of applicant’s 

preferred shares received preferred 

shares of RMR Real Estate Income Fund 

having an aggregate liquidation 

preference equal to the aggregate 

liquidation preference attributable to 

applicant’s preferred shares. Expenses 

of $202,707 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on June 24, 2009, and amended on 

August 10, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 400 Centre St., 

Newton, MA 02458. 

RMR Dividend Capture Fund [File No. 

811–22079] 

Summary: Applicant, a closed-end 

investment company, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On June 22, 2009, 

applicant transferred its assets to RMR 

Real Estate Income Fund, based on net 

asset value. Each holder of applicant’s 

preferred shares received preferred 

shares of RMR Real Estate Income Fund 

having an aggregate liquidation 

preference equal to the aggregate 

liquidation preference attributable to 

applicant’s preferred shares. Expenses 

of $128,701 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by 

applicant. 

Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on June 23, 2009, and amended on 

August 10, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 400 Centre St., 

Newton, MA 02458. 

Morgan Stanley Total Market Index 

Fund [File No. 811–9259] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On July 25, 2008, 

applicant made a liquidating 

distribution to its shareholders, based 

on net asset value. Expenses of $78,565 

incurred in connection with the 

liquidation were paid by Morgan 

Stanley Investment Advisors, Inc., 

applicant’s investment adviser. 

Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on July 6, 2009, and amended on 

August 7, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: c/o Morgan 

Stanley Investment Advisors Inc., 522 

Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10036. 

BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc. [File No. 

811–6654] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On September 12, 

2008, applicant transferred the assets 

from all of its series, except BNY 

Hamilton Multi-Cap Equity Fund and 

BNY Hamilton Municipal Enhanced 

Yield Fund (the ‘‘remaining series’’), to 

corresponding series of BNY Mellon 

Funds Trust, Dreyfus Institutional 

Reserves Funds, Dreyfus/Laurel Funds, 

Inc., Dreyfus/Laurel Funds Trust, 

Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. 

and Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash 

Management Funds, based on net asset 

value. On November 10, 2008, 

applicant’s remaining series transferred 

their assets to Managers AMG Funds, 

based on net asset value. Expenses of 

$2,772,500 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by The 

Bank of New York Mellon, applicant’s 

administrator. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on July 14, 2009. 

Applicant’s Address: 3435 Stelzer 

Rd., Columbus, OH 43219–3035. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Investment Management, pursuant to 

delegated authority. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–21221 Filed 9–2–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–60582; File No. 4–429] 

Joint Industry Plan; Order Approving 

Amendments To Withdraw From the 

Intermarket Options Linkage Plan Filed 

by Chicago Board Options Exchange, 

Incorporated, International Securities 

Exchange, LLC, The NASDAQ Stock 

Market LLC, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc., 

NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc., NYSE Amex 

LLC, and NYSE Arca, Inc. 

August 28, 2009. 

I. Introduction 

On June 25, 2009, June 25, 2009, July 

2, 2009, July 2, 2009, July 7, 2009, July 

17, 2009, and July 20, 2009, NYSE Arca, 

Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’), NYSE Amex, LLC 

(‘‘NYSE Amex’’), International 

Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’), 

Chicago Board Options Exchange, 

Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’), NASDAQ OMX 

BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’), NASDAQ OMX PHLX, 

Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’), and The NASDAQ Stock 

Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Participants’’),1 respectively, submitted 

to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

amendments to the Plan for the Purpose 

of Creating and Operating an 

Intermarket Option Linkage (‘‘Linkage 

Plan’’) (‘‘Amendments’’).2 The proposed 

Amendments were published for 

comment in the Federal Register on July 

28, 2009.3 The Commission received no 

comment letters in response to the 

Notice. This order approves the 

Amendments. 

II. Description of the Proposed 

Amendments 

The Participants submitted the 

Amendments to withdraw from the 

Linkage Plan. Pursuant to Section 4(d) 

of the Linkage Plan, a Participant may 

withdraw from the Linkage Plan by: (i) 

Providing not less than 30 days prior 

written notice to each of the other 

Participants and to the facilities 

manager 4 of such intent to withdraw; 

and (ii) effecting an amendment to the 

Linkage Plan as specified in Section 

5(c)(iii) of the Linkage Plan. Section 

5(c)(iii) of the Linkage Plan states that 

a Participant can withdraw from the 

Linkage Plan by filing an amendment 

deleting its name in Section 4(a) of the 

Linkage Plan and submitting such 

amendment to the Commission for 

approval. The submitting Participant 

must state how it plans to accomplish, 

by alternate means, the goals of the 

Linkage Plan regarding limiting tradethroughs of prices on other exchanges 

trading the same options classes. Such 

amendment is effective upon 

Commission approval. 

As set forth in the Notice, the 

Participants plan to accomplish the 

Linkage Plan’s goals through 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES