alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                     PARLEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Sept. 27, 1998      Sept. 28, 1997
                                        --------------      --------------

<S>                                       <C>                 <C>
Net Income Per Share - Basic                   $.04                $.20

Weighted Average Number
of Shares Outstanding                     4,640,795           3,591,353

Net Income Per Share - Diluted                 $.04                $.19

Weighted Average Number 
of Shares Outstanding                     4,640,795           3,591,353

Effect of Dilutive Stock Option             148,098             211,394

Adjusted Weighted Average
Number of Shares Outstanding              4,788,893           3,802,747
</TABLE>
# C_2005327EN.01000901.xml

| 23.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 December 2005

(2005/C 327/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1822 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4327 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5551 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,72 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0325 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9556 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,857 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8365 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6599 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,760 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6026 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6171 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3799 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1652 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7521 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9765 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 202,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5487 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5492 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3825 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 626,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,467 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,088 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,413 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1822

JPY

Japanese yen

138,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68100

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4327

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5551

ISK

Iceland króna

75,72

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0325

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9556

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

28,857

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8365

RON

Romanian leu

3,6599

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,760

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6026

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6171

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3799

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1652

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7521

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9765

KRW

South Korean won

1 202,95

ZAR

South African rand

7,5487

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5492

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3825

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 626,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,467

PHP

Philippine peso

63,088

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0950

THB

Thai baht

48,413

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 412.630 Limitation on review.

Administrative or judicial review under sections 1869 or 1878 of the Act, or otherwise, is prohibited with regard to the establishment of the methodology to classify a patient into the case-mix groups and the associated weighting factors, the Federal per discharge payment rates, additional payments for outliers and special payments, and the area wage index.

[78 FR 47934, Aug. 6, 2013]
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2.  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day of March 2005.                                                           /s/ W. Douglas Parker   W. Douglas Parker   Chief Executive Officer                                                          /s/ Derek J. Kerr   Derek J. Kerr   Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericaWest Holdings Corporation and will be retained by America West Holdings Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing).
# C_2005296EN.01002901.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/29

---

Action brought on 5 September 2005 — V/Parliament

(Case T-345/05)

(2005/C 296/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): V. (Binsted, United Kingdom) [represented by: J. Lofthouse, barrister, M. Monan, C. Hayes, solicitors]

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): European Parliament

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

| — | declare void and annul the Decision of the European Parliament dated 5 July 2005 to waive the applicant's immunity; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare void and annul the Decision of the European Parliament dated 5 July 2005 to waive the applicant's immunity;

| — | declare that the said Decision, even if valid, would in any event be void as to waiver of privilege, since it speaks only of immunity; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the said Decision, even if valid, would in any event be void as to waiver of privilege, since it speaks only of immunity; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a Member of the European Parliament. Criminal proceedings were instituted against him following which the Parliament was requested to confirm that the applicant's prosecution might proceed in accordance with the 1965 Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Communities and, in any event, waive any privilege or immunity so that the prosecution could proceed. By the contested Decision the Parliament decided to waive the applicant's immunity.

The applicant seeks the annulment of this Decision. He submits that the Decision was wrong in law in that it considers that Article 8 of the 1965 Protocol does not grant protection against judicial prosecution. He argues that the Parliament's reasoning is inconsistent, waiving something that it holds not to exist.

The applicant further contends that the Parliament did not carry out a fair and complete consideration of the facts and arguments of both sides. In this context the applicant also invokes a violation of Rule 7(7) of the Parliament's Rules of Procedure, to the extent that the Committee expressed an opinion on the merits of the prosecution whilst forbidden from doing so.

The applicant finally invokes the absence of full and adequate reasons for the contested Decision and submits that it was not reasonable or proportionate.

---
#### § 31.15 Continuance of medical relief after loss of status.

If a person is separated while undergoing treatment by the Service, his treatment shall be discontinued immediately unless the physician or dentist in charge determines that the condition of the patient does not permit interruption of treatment, in which case the treatment shall be discontinued as soon as practicable and the condition of the patient permits. At that time he shall be discharged from treatment and shall not thereafter be afforded medical relief by the Service by reason of his previous service.

(Sec. 610(b), 58 Stat. 714, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 763c)
# Qatar

215 items

        -    Report  		Qatar	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Qatar	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Qatar (15-623) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  June 23, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Qatar (12-815) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Military Information	  August 15, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Qatar (00-927) – Agreement concerning Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  September 27, 2000 

previous page1…202122

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3087 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3087

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 1996

 Mr. Ballenger (for himself, Mr. Goodling, and Mr. Fawell) introduced 
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 7(e)(3) of 
the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 207(e)(3)) is amended 
by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: ``; or (d) 
the payments are made to reward an employee or group of employees for 
meeting or exceeding the productivity, quality, efficiency, or sales 
goals as specified in a gainsharing, incentive bonus, commission, or 
performance contingent bonus plan''.
                                 <all>
```
Chair Acting Designated Federal Officer

Diane Austin, Ph.D. Mark Joyce

Telephone: ( 520 ) 626

- 3879 Telephone: (202) 5 64

- 2130

E

- mail: daustin@email.arizona.edu E

- mail: joyce.mark@epa.gov



### September 21 , 2011

President Barack Obama

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20006

Dear Mr. President:

As your advisory committee on environmental issues along the U.S.

- Mexico border, the Good

Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) writes to urge the United States, as a party to the North

American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, to work with the other signatories, Mexico

and Canada, and finally conclude an a greement on Transboundary Environmental Impact

Assessment (TEIA). TEIA matters tremendously to border residents and stakeholders.

We have previously written about the urgent need to finalize an agreement on TEIA, most

recently in our 13 th 

### annual report, r eleased in June 2010. We also raised the issue in our May

2009 advice letter, as well as in our 4 th 

### , 5 th 

### , and 6 th 

### annual reports. And in September 2009, the

ten U.S.

- Mexico Border Governors agreed in their joint declaration that finalizing TEIA was

importa nt. The three parties have missed the deadline for finalizing an agreement by more than

14 years

— a delay which has led to innumerable instances of nonexistent or poor notification,

assessment, or mitigation of environmental projects with a cross

- border imp act.

Some examples of transboundary environmental impacts which have not been addressed since

1994 due to the failure to conclude a TEIA agreement: water quality impacts on shared rivers

between the U.S. and Mexico; elevated ozone levels in remote rural a reas; and use of shared

aquifers, which the Congressionally

- mandated Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program

(TAAP) seeks to address. Managed by the U.S. G eological S urvey in our country, the TAAP is of

crucial importance to the border region, where water is becoming a limiting resource.

GOOD NEIGHBOR ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD

Presidential advisory commi ttee on environmental and infrastructure issues

along the U.S. border with Mexico

### 2

Once again, we urge you to renew efforts to conclude this agreement that is so vital to residents

and the environment of the border region.

Sincerely yours,

Di ane E. Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

N OTE: Good Neighbor Environmental Board representative s from Federal Departments and

Agencies have recused their organizations from this Comment Letter.

cc: The Honorable Joe Biden

The Vice President of the United States

The Honorable Nancy Sutley

Chair, Council on Environmental Quality

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson

Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00063

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.R.M., CHILD,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 11

- 22140

- CV The Honorable Cathy O. Morris, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant timely filed a n otice of appeal on February 5, 2015. Accordingly, the record was due Tuesday, February 17, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b). The reporter’s record was not
filed.

On February 19, 2015, the clerk of this court sent the court reporter, Debra Gifford, a letter notifying her she is the reporter responsible for the record. The letter required a notification of late record be filed by February 24, or the record be filed by March 2, 2015. Gifford has not responded to our letter and the record has not been filed.

We order the court reporter, Debra Gifford, to file the reporter’s record by March 1 2

, 2015

. The court will not grant any further extension of time to file the record in the absence of a showing of extraordinary circumstances that prevent the timely filing of the record and reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court. Because this is an appeal from the termination of parental rights, “the trial court must direct the official or deputy reporter to immediately c ommence the preparation of the reporter’s record. The trial court must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(b)(1 );

s ee T EX .R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (“[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring

that th e appellate record is timely filed”).

___________ ______________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1642]


Designation of New Grantee; Foreign-Trade Zone 219, Yuma, AZ; 
Resolution and Order

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) adopts the following Order:

    The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered 
the application (filed 06/23/2009) submitted by the Yuma County 
Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 219, Yuma, Arizona, requesting 
reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Greater 
Yuma Economic Development Corporation, a non-profit organization, 
which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ 
Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal 
is in the public interest.
    Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the 
Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation as the new grantee of 
Foreign Trade Zone 219, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21621 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomePanama

# Panama

159 items

        -    Media Note  		New Partnership with Panama to Explore Semiconductor Supply-Chain Opportunities	  July 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Juan Carlos Varela Rodriguez,  Former Panamanian President, for Significant Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 13, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Panama	  June 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		World Ocean Day 2023:  Celebrating Our Victories, Planning for Our Future 	  Maxine  BurkettJune 8, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Colombia Joint Commitment to Address the Hemispheric Challenge of Irregular Migration	  June 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador at Large Fick’s Travel to Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Panama	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 3, 2023	  Vedant PatelMay 3, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Conference with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  April 14, 2023 

previous page12345…16next page

Back to Top
April11, 2013 

Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 

This is to inform the Department of our objection to the termination ofEAS Eligibility 

for Lewistown, Montana. 

The termination of this service leaves this community of more than 6,000 people without 

ANY INTERCITY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WHATSOEVER. 

As who is now in his eighties, I find this to be intolerable since it leaves me stranded in 

this city with no way to leave except by the mercy of others who may be going to the 

place I need to go for medical or other business purposes. I don't know how I will get to 

my cardiologist, for instance. In the large centers of the United States this is probably 

difficult to even imagine. In the hinterlands of Montana, however, it is the reality with 

which we live. 

If this service were connected to Denver, CO, it would be possible for me to make the 

arrangements that I need. If I cannot get out of town, I am even stranded without the 

availability of some necessary medical services. 

In recent times, we have had a flight connecting to Billings, MT. This apparently was 

unsatisfactory to those who can drive for it was easier to drive to Billings than to wait for 

an uncertain flight. For me, however, this was something I could use. 

My plea is that you either restore the Billings service or, perhaps even better, return to the 

Denver connection. 

Thank you for your help. 

Sincerely, 

15o:nalak. {fjau 

Donald E. Pfau 

PO Box 780 

Lewistown, MT 59457 

C: dennis.devany@dot.gov, scott.faulk@dot.gov, eas@,dot.gov 

Senator Baucus; Senator Tester 

· ..c: -:~ 

~- ._) --'
§ 412.120 Reductions to total payments. ( a ) *Deductible and coinsurance.* Subject to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the total Medicare payments otherwise payable to a hospital are reduced by the applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts related to inpatient hospital services as determined in accordance with §§ 409.82, 409.83, and 409.87 of this chapter.
( b ) *Payment by workers' compensation, automobile medical, no-fault or liability insurance or an employer group health plan primary to Medicare.* If workers' compensation, automobile medical, no-fault, or liability insurance or an employer group health plan which is primary to Medicare pays in full or in part, the Medicare payment is determined in accordance with the following guidelines: ( 1 ) If workers' compensation pays, in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 405.316 through 405.321 of this chapter.
( 2 ) If automobile medical, no-fault, or liability insurance pays, in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 405.322 through 405.325 of this chapter.
( 3 ) If an employer group health plan which is primary to Medicare pays for services to ESRD beneficiaries, in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 405.326 through 405.329 of this chapter.
( 4 ) If an employer group health plan which is primary to Medicare pays for services to employees age 65-69 and their spouses age 65-69, in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 405.340 through 405.344 of this chapter.
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 55 FR 36071, Sept. 4, 1990; 56 FR 573, Jan. 7, 1991; 57 FR 39825, Sept. 1, 1992]
693 A.2d 201

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Andrew J. BYRNE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 30, 1997.

Decided May 20, 1997.

Stuart Suss, West Chester, for Commonwealth.

*25John J. Duffy, for Andrew Byrne.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Order of Superior Court reversed. *See Commonwealth v. Myers,*530 Pa. 396, 609 A.2d 162 (1992).

CASTILLE and NEWMAN, JJ., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Time And Date:  11 a.m., Friday September 4, 2009

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room

Status:  Closed

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance matters

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-21164 Filed 8-28-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lindy CRADDOCK.

No. 55206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1974.

In re: Lindy Craddock, applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. The record has now been filed in this Court. The matter is moot.