alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Amarillo Mesquite Grill, Inc. for the fiscal
quarter ended April 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         427,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    145,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               704,999
<PP&E>                                      10,444,995
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,226,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,631,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,117,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,011
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,557,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,631,895
<SALES>                                      5,629,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,629,353
<CGS>                                        1,923,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,340,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,842
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
HomeThird-Party Contractor...David Michael Patterson

# 									David Michael Patterson							

DS Memorial

April 21, 2005

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Third-Party Contractor****Year of Death: 2005**

David Michael Patterson, Private Security Contractor, died on April 21, 2005, in Iraq, north of Baghdad, during a helicopter crash (missile attack). His hometown is Havelock, North Carolina.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Third Party ContractorIraq

Back to Top
## OEPARTMENTO F

U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n ! i'l'^NSFORTA l l(^^ ^ ^__ ^ Docke tNo . FA

A2012-008 9 ^QGi'-E l OPERA ! lUiv: ) 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve . SE Wes tBuildin g Gran d Floor , RooomW-12014 0 l^\ l FE" 8 1 U P ' " ^ 5 Washington , D C 2059 0 T O WHO M THI S MA YCONCERN : I a m writin g i n suppor to fth e continuatio n o fth e flight s fro m Lansing , M l t o Washingto n D.C. , Reaga n Internationa l airport . "W e havFlDee n s o excite d t o hav e direc tservic e t o D.C. , aservice.whic h wa s absen t foj ; man yyears . Personally , ou rfamil yha s benefitte d a s ou rdaughte rlive s i n D.C . Holiday s n o longe rar e cu t shor t b y th e length ytri p t o Detroi tMetro , traffi can d lon g check-i n lines . W e hav e bee n absolutel yimpresse d wit h Su n Country , al l flight s takin g of fan d landin g o n schedule . 100 % o fou rflight s hav e gon e smoothl yan d w e ca n sa ythi s abou t n o othe rairline . Fro m a broade rstandpoint , thi s servic e i s goo d fo rLansing' s infrastructur e an d economy . W e appreciat e ou rwonderfu l eas yacces s airpor t an d wan tt o d o wha t w e ca n t o hel p i t flourish . W e nee d fo rpeopl e t o b e abl e t o easil yge there . I tbenefit s th e loca l businesse s an d manufacturing . W e understan d tha tthi s migh tb e abl e t o b e remedie d b ychangin g th e fligh t schedule . Pleas e strongl y conside rdoin g this . Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e an d consideration . Lauri e Stirlin g ( j 10 8 Chanticlee rTrai l Lansing , M l 4891 7 PHONE : 51 7 505-694 6
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2720 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2720

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
          coastwise trade for the vessel WATER FRONT PROPERTY.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 1995

Mr. Weldon of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
          coastwise trade for the vessel WATER FRONT PROPERTY.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 
12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation 
may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement 
for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel WATER FRONT 
PROPERTY (United States official number 987686).
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-8893.

#### Perkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 136.11 Services available. ( a ) *Type of services that may be available.* Services for the Indian community served by the local facilities and program may include hospital and medical care, dental care, public health nursing and preventive care (including immunizations), and health examination of special groups such as school children.
( b ) *Where services are available.* Available services will be provided at hospitals and clinics of the Service, and at contract facilities (including tribal facilities under contract with the Service).
( c ) *Determination of what services are available.* The Service does not provide the same health services in each area served. The services provided to any particular Indian community will depend upon the facilities and services available from sources other than the Service and the financial and personnel resources made available to the Service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,561
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   755
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    102,960
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        150,006
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 387,385
<DEPOSITS>                                     233,576
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,440
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,636
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,650
<COMMON>                                         1,321
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 287,385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,096
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,691
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    28
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,815
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,831
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,984
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      242
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (242)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          60
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.31
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,261
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 16,792
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,594
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,369
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,369
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
698 A.2d 805

#### HARRISBURG AUTO AUCTION, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 30, 1997.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Order of the Commonwealth Court dated November 20, 1996, is AFFIRMED.
# C_2005229EN.01002001.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/20

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 June 2005

in Case T-298/03 Lavorazione Cuoio e Pelli Bieffe Srl v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - No disclosure of a document originating from a Member State without the prior consent of that State)

(2005/C 229/42)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-298/03: Lavorazione Cuoio e Pelli Bieffe Srl, established in San Miniato (Italy), represented by M. Calabrese, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (agents: V. Di Bucci and P. Aalto, with A. Abate, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to a State aid scheme declared compatible with the common market by Commission decision of 12 July 2000 (SG (2000) D/105754 — State Aid N 715/99) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Sváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 1.11.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Lee, sole director and officer of Viropro, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on 10KSB of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 27, 2004



/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________



Richard Lee

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as chief executive officer and principal accounting officer)
# C_2005318EN.01000602.xml

| 14.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3765 — Amer/Salomon)

(2005/C 318/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3765. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3765. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005190EN.01000101.xml

| 4.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 August 2005

(2005/C 190/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2308 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69110 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3803 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5585 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,05 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8425 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5736 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,844 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0770 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4505 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,870 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6223 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6001 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4902 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5667 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7836 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0314 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 249,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9488 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9758 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3265 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 012,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,611 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,017 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,803 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2308

JPY

Japanese yen

136,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69110

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3803

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5585

ISK

Iceland króna

78,05

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8425

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5736

CZK

Czech koruna

29,844

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0770

RON

Romanian leu

3,4505

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,870

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6223

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6001

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4902

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5667

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7836

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0314

KRW

South Korean won

1 249,26

ZAR

South African rand

7,9488

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9758

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3265

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 012,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,611

PHP

Philippine peso

69,017

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0750

THB

Thai baht

50,803

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                          DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 1995

     This Agreement dated as of January 1, 1995 (the "Amendment") is among
Hudson United Bank (the "Bank"), HUBCO, Inc. ("HUBCO"), and D. Lynn Van
Borkulo-Nuzzo ("Van Borkulo-Nuzzo"), and amends the Employment Agreement dated
May 24, 1990 (the "Employment Agreement") among the same parties.

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement and to extend
the Term thereof,

     It Is Hereby agreed as follows:

1.  The term of the Employment shall be extended through December 31, 1998.

2.  Whenever "Base Salary" is referred to in the Employment Agreement, it shall
    be defined as W-2 compensation, which shall include, but not be limited to,
    salary, bonuses, restricted stock awards, and other items of taxable income
    included on the W-2 issued by HUBCO or the Bank.

3.  "Average annual compensation" shall be computed based upon W-2 compensation.

3.  Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
    force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HUBCO and the Bank have executed this Amendment by
their duly authorized officers and Van Borkulo-Nuzzo has executed this Amendment
as her own voluntary act.

                                         HUBCO, INC.

                                           /s/ KENNETH T. NEILSON
                                      By:  -----------------------------------
                                           Kenneth T. Neilson,
                                           President & C.E.O.


                                           /s/ JAMES E. SCHIERLOH
                                      By:  -----------------------------------
                                           James E. Schierloh,
                                           Chairman


                                      HUDSON UNITED BANK

                                           /s/ KENNETH T. NEILSON
                                      By:  -----------------------------------
                                           Kenneth T. Neilson,
                                           President & C.E.O.

                                           /s/ JAMES E. SCHIERLOH
                                      By:  -----------------------------------
                                           James E. Schierloh,
                                           Chairman


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

/s/ D. LYNN VAN BORKULO-NUZZO
-----------------------------------
D. Lynn Van Borkulo-Nuzzo, Employee
No. 17,428.

#### Denke-Walter *v.*Loeper et al.

Appellate Pbocedtjbe. — • *Vacation*Appeal.— Dismissal.— *Parties Appellant.*— A vacation appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, where all the joint judgment defendants in the trial court are not made co-appellants.

Erom the Marion Superior Court.

*Herod & Herod,*for appellant.

*W. A. Ketcham,*for appellees.

*658Filed December 10, 1895.

Monks, J.

Ida M. Loeper, one of appellees, brought this action against her co-appellees and appellant to quiet title to real estate.

Cross-complaints were filed by certain of the appellees to quiet title to a part of the same real estate.

The cause was tried and judgment rendered quieting the title to said real estate, as prayed for in the complaint and in the cross-complaint. Judgment was also rendered against appellants, Mary O. Denke-Walter and Frederick W. Denke-Walter (who is made an appellee in this court) for costs.

It is settled law in this State that all joint-judgment defendants in the court below must be made co-appellants in this court in all vacation appeals or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Acts 1895, p. 17 9 ; Elliott App. Proced., section 144; *Inman*v. *Vogel,*141 Ind. 138, and cases cited; *Walsh*v. *Brockway,*13 Ind. App. 70.

There can be but one appeal from the same judgment, and when the same is not a term time appeal all co-parties entitled to- appeal must be joined as co-appellants. Acts 1895, p. 179 ; *Inman*v. *Vogel, supra; Gregory v. Smith,*139 Ind. 48, and cases cited.

The appeal in this case was not a term time appeal and is not therefore governed hy the provisions of the acts approved March 9, 1895. Acts 1895, p. 179.

Frederick W. Denke-Walter was a co-party and joint-judgment defendant with appellant in the court below, and should have been made co-appellant in this court. This not having been done the appeal must be dismissed. *Gregory*v. *Smith, supra; Inman*v. *Vogel, supra,*and cases cited; *Midland R. W. Co.*v. *St. Clair,*42 N. E. Rep. 214.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
#### § 598.302 Effective date.

The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives of this part, which is December 3, 1999, or, in the case of specially designated narcotics traffickers designated after that date, the earlier of the date on which actual or constructive notice of such designation is received.
#### DAVID F. MOORE v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 249 U. S., 487.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the. judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

The act of June 25, 1910, chapter 423, 36 Statutes, 851, allowing compensation from the United States for use of patented inventions, provides that it shall not apply to any device discov*196ered or invented by a Government employee “during the time of bis employment or service ”: *Helé,*that this prevents recovery where the invention was completed during such service although in the hours when the inventor was not actually on duty.

Mr. Justice Clarke

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 14, 1919.
# Palau

79 items

        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Palau	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL – Promoting Investigative Journalism and Anti-Corruption Efforts in Pacific Island Countries	  February 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Palau	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Palau	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Palau	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Palau	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Palau	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Palau	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Palau	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Palau (18-919.9) – Amendment to Agreement Regarding the Operation of Telecommunication Services	  September 19, 2018 

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top