alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Sources of Illicit DPRK Revenue

# 									Designating Sources of Illicit DPRK Revenue							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 27, 2024

The United States is today designating eight individuals and entities instrumental in the transfer of funds that boost Pyongyang’s ability to develop its unlawful weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program. These designations target networks that have assisted in the transfer of WMD components, engaged in illicit exports that have enriched the Kim regime, and served as linchpins in the financial networks that funnel illicit funds to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).

We are taking this action in coordination with the Republic of Korea, underscoring our collective resolve to counter the DPRK’s sanction evasion activities. We will continue to consider all tools available to degrade the DPRK’s ability to finance its unlawful and destabilizing activities. Today’s designations coincide with the sixth U.S.-ROK Working Group on DPRK Cyber Threats and highlight our two countries’ extensive cooperation aiming to disrupt the DPRK’s ability to generate revenue for its unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs through cyber-enabled activities.

*The Department of the Treasury action was taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13382, E.O. 13722, E.O. 13551, E.O. 13810, and E.O. 13687. For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationCyber IssuesDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1



                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


$5,000,000                                                        March 23, 2000


                  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PURCHASESOFT, INC, a Delaware
corporation ("Borrower"), promises to pay to the order of L-R GLOBAL
PARTNERS, L.P., a New York limited partnership ("Lender"), at such place as
the holder hereof may designate, in lawful money of the United States of
America, the principal sum of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000), plus
interest as hereinafter provided, on demand. This Note shall bear interest on
the unpaid principal amount hereof at the rate of 6% per annum; PROVIDED,
that interest shall accrue at the rate of 8% per annum on any principal or
accrued interest that is not paid within five days of written demand, from
the date of such demand until the date of payment.

                  Borrower waives presentment, demand, protest, notice of
protest, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, any and all other notices
and demands in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default
or enforcement of this Note. No delay by the holder hereof in exercising any
power or right in respect of this Note shall operate as a waiver of such or
any other power or right.

                  Borrower may at any time prepay in whole or in part, from
time to time, the outstanding principal amount all of this Note, together
with accrued interest to date of payment on the principal amount so prepaid.

                  Borrower shall pay the holder hereof all costs and expenses
of collection of this Note, including without limitation reasonable
attorneys' fees.

                  This Note shall be deemed to be made under and shall be
construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New
York.

                                        PURCHASESOFT, INC.


                                        By /s/  Jeffrey Pinkerton
                                           ------------------------
                                             Jeffrey Pinkerton
                                             President and CEO
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL COMPANY v. SWOOPE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., et al.

No. 51108.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 11, 1979.

Stone, Graham, Segrest & Johnson, Thomas L. Segrest, Columbus, for appellant.

Threadgill & Smith, Gary L. Geeslin, Columbus, for appellees.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lowndes County; Lenore L. Prather, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.
#### J. E. McCLUSKEY and Harry G. May, Appellant, v. Nancy Kelley WITTENBERG, Secretary of the Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Appellee.

No. 80-496.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 1981.

Richard J. R. Parkinson, of Parkinson & Pyle, Orlando, for appellants.

Deborah J. Miller, Staff Atty. Dept, of Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of *Starchk v. Wittenberg,*392 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the order denying dismissal of the petition is reversed, the injunction is dissolved, and the petition is dismissed.

ORFINGER, COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00764-CV

IN RE GMG HEALTH SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, PA d/b/a Gonzaba Medical Group, 

Relator

Original Mandamus Proceedings1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 22, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has 

determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CI-04044, styled Olga Zamora, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey Zamora v. GMG Health Systems Associates, PA d/b/a Gonzaba Medical 

Group, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Larry Noll is the 

presiding judge of the 408th Judicial District Court; however, the Honorable Michael Peden, presiding judge of the 

285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, signed the order at issue in this proceeding.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2007, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                         
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                                                                     
|                        |  |     |  | Steven A. Abney                                                                                         
|                        |  |     |  | Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer
SERVED JANUAR Y 19,2010 ^rpj QC TOA^iQpoRJAliOI-

•\ \ r\ r"} 9' l! >--

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP05SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2005-22891 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP09SW0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0279 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 

These matters currently are scheduled to be heard beginning January 25,2010. 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") on January 15,2010, 

filed a Motion for Continuance ("Motion"). Respondent Mesa Airlines, Inc. 

("Respondent") petitioned for bankruptcy on January 5,2010, the Motion recites, and the 

parties, who are in the process of settling both cases, now must obtain the approval of the 

bankruptcy trustee for a valid settlement. In these unusual circumstances, the Motion 

continues, a continuance would be in the best interests of both parties. 
For good cause shown, Complainant's Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

The hearing in these consolidated matters is hereby continued; it will be 

rescheduled by subsequent order. 

Attachment - Service List 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket Nos. CP09SW0002 

&NCP09SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Christopher PappaioanouDirector, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: 602-685-4000 

FAX: 602-685-4350 

Annjenet Chennault, Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Coimsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Groimd Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Henry S. Pennypacker, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director and Mary
Bailey Sellers, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                            Dated: December 12, 2008
        --------------------
    Henry S. Pennypacker
    Title: Chief Executive Officer

    /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
        -------------------
    Mary Bailey Sellers
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
§ 137.257 What steps must the Secretary take prior to reassumption becoming effective? Except as provided in § 137.261 for immediate reassumption, prior to a reassumption becoming effective, the Secretary must: ( a ) Notify the Self-Governance Tribe in writing by certified mail of the details of findings required under § 137.256(a)(1) and (2);
( b ) Request specified corrective action within a reasonable period of time, which in no case may be less than 45 days;
( c ) Offer and provide, if requested, the necessary technical assistance and advice to assist the Self-Governance Tribe to overcome the conditions that led to the findings described under (a); and
( d ) Provide the Self-Governance Tribe with a hearing on the record as provided under Subpart P of this part.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q-SB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, of Security Capital Corporation (the "Company"), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Connie Woods Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
     as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins
DATE:  August 11, 2003                   By ___________________________
                                            Connie Woods Hawkins
                                            Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
will be retained by Security Capital Corporation and will be furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Chile

120 items

        -    		Travel to Colombia, Chile, and Peru October 3-7, 2022	   
        -    		Travel to Colombia, Chile, and Peru October 3-7, 2022	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing on Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Colombia, Chile, and Peru	  Brian A. NicholsSeptember 30, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Colombia, Chile, and Peru October 3-7, 2022	  Ned PriceSeptember 30, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Chile National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 7, 2022	  Vedant PatelSeptember 7, 2022Washington D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Chile	  July 28, 2022 
        -    		United States – Chile FTA Environmental Chapter	   
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Chile	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt to Travel to Argentina, Chile	  July 14, 2022 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
#### William J. Hardy et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*The Knickerbocker Trust Co., as Committee of the Property of Mary A. Lucas, an Incompetent Person, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

May, 1898.)

Preference on' the calendar — One who claims a statutory preference will be held to strict practice.

Where the plaintiff seeks a preference on the calendar upon the statutory ground that the sole defendant is the committee of a lunatic, strict practice must be followed and a notice that an application for the preference will be made at the opening of court must be served at the same time with the'notice of trial.

A statement, contained in a notice of trial, “'that ñ preferene is claimed herein, under section 791, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that the Knickerbocker Trust Cto., as the committee of the property of iMary A. Lucas, an incompetent person, is the sole defendant herein,” is an Insufficient compliance with section 793 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion for an order pf preference.

Hardy & Kennedy, for motion.

Davies, Stone *&*Auerbach, opposed.

*504Gildersleeve, J.

This is a motion for a preference7- on the statutory ground that the sole defendant is the committee of a.lunatic. See Oode, § 791, subd. 5. It is not claimed by the moving party here that there has been an exact compliance with the ,re- - quirements of section 793 of the Oode, which provides that a party desiring a preference of any cause shall serve upon the opposite party,- with his notice of trial, a .notice that an application will be made to the court, at the opening thereof, for leave to move the same as a preferred cause. The notice of trial in the case at bar was served on April 16th,'while the notice of motion for the1 prefer-' ence was served on April 29th. In the notice of trial, however, it is stated “ that a preference is claimed herein, under section 791, subdivision 5, .of the Oode of Oivil Procedure, on the ground that the Knickerbocker Trust Co., as the committee of the property idf Mary A. Lucas, an incompetent person, is the sole .defendant herein” It is urged by the plaintiff that this .statement in the notice of trial is a sufficient compliance with the provisions of the statute.- I think this position untenable. In the case at bar, the motion is not addressed to the discretion of the1 court, but made solely as a matter of right under the terms of the statute; and, in the. case -of Marks v. Murphy, 27 App. Div. 160; 50 3ST. Y. Snpp. 622, the Appellate Division have held that where a motion for a preference is made solely as a matter of .right, under Hie- terms of the Statute, parties axe held to strict practice. The motion must he denied, for the reason that the plaintiff has n-ot observed the strict practice required under the circumstances.

Motion denied.
§ 417.494 Modification or termination of contract. ( a ) *Modification or termination by mutual consent.* ( 1 ) CMS and an HMO or CMP may modify or terminate a contract at any time by written mutual consent.
( 2 ) If the contract is modified, the HMO or CMP must notify its Medicare enrollees of any changes that CMS determines are appropriate for notification.
( 3 ) If the contract is terminated, the HMO or CMP must notify its Medicare enrollees, and CMS notifies the general public, at least 30 days before the termination date.
( b ) *Termination by CMS.* ( 1 ) CMS may terminate a contract for any of the following reasons: ( i ) The HMO or CMP has failed substantially to carry out the terms of the contract.
( ii ) The HMO or CMP is carrying out the contract in a manner that is inconsistent with the effective and efficient implementation of section 1876 of the Act.
( iii ) The HMO or CMP has failed substantially to comply with the composition of enrollment requirements specified in § 417.413(d).
( iv ) CMS determines that the HMO or CMP no longer meets the requirements of section 1876 of the Act and this subpart for being an HMO or CMP.
( 2 ) If CMS decides to terminate a contract, it sends a written notice informing the HMO or CMP of its right to appeal the termination in accordance with part 422 subpart N of this chapter.
( 3 ) An HMO or CMP with a risk contract must notify its Medicare enrollees of the termination as described in § 417.488.
( 4 ) CMS notifies the HMO's or CMP's Medicare enrollees and the general public of the termination at least 30 days before the effective date of termination.
( c ) *Termination by the HMO or CMP.* The HMO or CMP may terminate the contract if CMS has failed substantially to carry out the terms of the contract. ( 1 ) The HMO or CMP must notify CMS at least 90 days before the effective date of the termination and must include in its notice the reasons for the termination.
( 2 ) The HMO or CMP must notify its Medicare enrollees of the termination at least 60 days before the termination date. Risk HMOs or CMPs must also provide a written description of alternatives available for obtaining Medicare services after termination of the contract. The HMO or CMP is responsible for the cost of these notices.
( 3 ) The HMO or CMP must notify the general public of the termination at least 30 days before the termination date.
( 4 ) The contract is terminated effective 60 days after the HMO or CMP mails the notice to Medicare enrollees as required in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
( 5 ) CMS's liability for payment ends as of the first day of the month after the last month for which the contract is in effect.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 22322, June 11, 1987; 56 FR 46571, Sept. 13, 1991; 58 FR 38079, 38082, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45681, Sept. 1, 1995; 75 FR 19803, Apr. 15, 2010]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Pioneers and where they are nowA description of the Pioneer project, its history and achievements is given. Major discoveries concerning near and interplanetary space, the planets, and various comets are outlined. Anticipated future observations are considered. A list of Pioneer project launches, 1986 statuses, and project firsts is given.Document ID19890014962Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - NASA Educational Publication (EP)AuthorsMontoya, Earl J.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Fimmel, Richard O.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.19:264NASA-EP-264Accession Number89N24333Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890014962.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: June 16, 2011, United Steel Workers Meeting with EPA on the 2011 NHSM Final

Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On June 16, 2011, EPA met with members of the Un ited Steel Workers to discuss their issues and concerns with the final rule entitled, “Ide ntification of Non-Hazar dous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule.

During that meeting, members from the United Steel Workers expressed concerns with the general application of rule, and biomass in particular. EPA aske d clarifying questions regarding

the information discussed.

Expected Meeting Attendees

Members from the United Steel Workers

EPA invitees: Mathy Stanislaus

Jim Berlow Barry Breen George Faison

Lisa Feldt

Suzanne Rudzinski

Matt Straus
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANADA22-0213TODDMARTINRUDE,PetitionerandAppellant,v.STATEOFMONTANA,RespondentandAppellee.NOV152022BowenGrartwoodCi-ofECourtS'tate.ofivinntanaORDERAppellantToddMartinRudewasgrantedanextensionoftimetofileandservehisopeningbriefonorbeforeSepternber20,2022.Nothingfurtherwasfiled,andonOctober3,2022,thisCourtorderedthatAppellantprepare,file,andservetheopeningbriefnolaterthanNovernber2,2022.Nothingfurtherhasbeenfiled.ITISTHEREFOREORDEREDthatthiscaseisDISMISSEDWITHPREJUDICE.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisOrdertoToddMartinRudeandtoallcounselofrecord.DATEDthisCdayofNovember,2022.ChiefJusticeA!yrJustices11/15/2022Case Number: DA 22-0213