alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.27 Other services generally provided by (or under arrangements made by) SNFs. In addition to those services specified in §§ 409.21 through 409.26, Medicare pays as posthospital SNF care for such other diagnostic and therapeutic services as are generally provided by (or under arrangements made by) SNFs, including— ( a ) Medical and other health services as described in subpart B of part 410 of this chapter, subject to any applicable limitations or exclusions contained in that subpart or in § 409.20(b);
( b ) Respiratory therapy services prescribed by a physician for the assessment, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, management, and monitoring of patients with deficiencies and abnormalities of cardiopulmonary function; and
( c ) Transportation by ambulance that meets the general medical necessity requirements set forth in § 410.40(e)(1) of this chapter.
[63 FR 26307, May 12, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 41681, July 30, 1999; 84 FR 63187, Nov. 15, 2019]
CEMP-CE 4 December 2007 

ERRATA SHEET

No. 1

Explosives 

RECURRING REVIEWS ON ORDNANCE AND EXPLOSIVES (OE) 

RESPONSE ACTIONS 

EP 75-1-4 

31 October 2003 

Pending the next update to EP 75-1-4, the following changes to the document are to be 

implemented. 

Wherever this document uses the term Military Munitions Center of Expertise (MM-CX), 

Ordnance and Explosives Mandatory Center of Expertise (OE-MCX), or the Hazardous, 

Toxic, or Radioactive Waste Center of Expertise (HTRW-CX), it refers to the recently 

reorganized Corps of Engineers Huntsville Center Environmental and Munitions Center 

of Expertise, hereafter referred to as CEHNC-EM-CX or EM-CX. 

Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) issues and questions should be directed 

to the Military Munitions Division of the EM-CX. Any authorities assigned to the former 

MM CX are now transferred to the Military Munitions Division of the EM CX. Other 

environmental issues, questions, and policies typically handled by the former HTRW CX 

will be handled by the appropriate divisions within the EM-CX; Environmental 

Compliance & Management Division (CEHNC-CX-EC), Environmental Engineering & 

Geology Division (CEHNC-CX-EG), and Environmental Sciences Division (CEHNCCX-ES).
# C_2006086EN.01000201.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 9 February 2006

in Case C-305/03 Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 2(1), 5(4)(c), 12(3), and 16(1) - Transaction within the territory of the country - Sale by auction of works of art imported under the arrangements for temporary importation - Auctioneers' commission)

(2006/C 86/03)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-305/03 Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal, Agent) v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: C. Jackson and R. Caudwell, Agents, and N. Paines QC) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 16 July 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr, U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur) and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 February 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by applying a reduced rate of value added tax to the commission received by auctioneers on sales by auction of works of art, antiques and collectors' items imported under the arrangements for temporary importation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(1), 5(4)(c), 12(3) and 16(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 1999/49/EC of 25 May 1999; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by applying a reduced rate of value added tax to the commission received by auctioneers on sales by auction of works of art, antiques and collectors' items imported under the arrangements for temporary importation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(1), 5(4)(c), 12(3) and 16(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 1999/49/EC of 25 May 1999;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 20.09.2003.

1

---
# C_2006086EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 25 October 2005

in Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02: Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Agriculture - Geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs - The name ‘feta’ - Regulation (EC) No 1829/2002 - Validity)

(2006/C 86/01)

Language of the cases: German and Danish

In Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: W.-D. Plessing, Agent, assisted by M. Loschelder, Rechtsanwalt) applicant in Case C-465/02; Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Molde and J. Bering Liisberg, Agents) applicant in Case C-466/02, supported by: French Republic, (represented by: G. de Bergues and A. Colomb, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: C. Jackson, Agent) v Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.L. Iglesias Buhigues and H. C. Støvlbæk, and A. M. Rouchaud-Joët and S. Grünheid, Agents) supported by: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Kontolaimos and I.-K. Chalkias, Agents) — applications for annulment pursuant to Article 230 EC, brought on 30 December 2002 — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and J. Malenovský, Presidents of Chambers, J. P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), J. Klučka, U. Lõhmus and E. Levits, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 25 October 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs in relation to Case C-465/02 and the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs in relation to Case C-466/02; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs in relation to Case C-465/02 and the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs in relation to Case C-466/02;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 08.03.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 21.1

                   Subsidiaries of Omega Financial Corporation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                             State or Jurisdiction          Trade Name
                                                 of Incorporation              (if any)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>
Omega Bank, N.A.                                  United States               Omega Bank
P.O. Box 298                                                          Hollidaysburg Trust Company
State College, PA    16804                                            Penn Central National Bank
                                                                                SunBank
                                                                             Guaranty Bank

Omega Financial Company, LLC                      Delaware                        --
1105 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE  19899

Central Pennsylvania Investment Company           Delaware                        --
1105 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19899

Omega Insurance Agency                            Pennsylvania         Omega Investment Services
366 Walker Drive
State College, PA  16801

Central Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company       Arizona                         --
1421 E. Thomas Road
Phoenix, AZ  85014

Central Pennsylvania Leasing, Inc.                Pennsylvania                    --

Central Pennsylvania Real Estate, Inc.            Pennsylvania                    --

Bank Capital Services                             Pennsylvania
34 Route 315
Pittston, PA 18640

Sentry Trust Company                              Pennsylvania
785 Fifth Avenue
Chambersburg PA 17201

Sun Investment Services, Inc.                     Pennsylvania
Lewisburg, PA

Beacon Life Insurance Company                     Arizona
101 N. First Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Mid-Penn Insurance Associates                     Pennsylvania
51 South Fourth Street
Sunbury, PA 17801

Sun Bancorp Statutory Trust I                     Connecticut
c/o US Bank
One Federal Street, Third Floor
Boston MA 02110

Omega Financial Capital Trust I                   Delaware
366 Walker Drive
State College, PA 16801

SUBI Services Inc.                                Pennsylvania
Lewisburg, PA

</TABLE>


                                       58
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sienfried Saurll DAVIS.

No. 63117.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 16, 1978.

In re: Sienfried Saurll Davis applying for remedial writ. Orleans Parish.

Granted. The trial judge is ordered to appoint counsel for the applicant forthwith. See Article 230.1 Code of Criminal Procedure.
#### HARRIS REMODELING CORP., Appellant, v. STEELCRETE BUILDING CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 73-1336.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
1 

### T o n g, St a nl ey

Fr o m: B ru ce S p ring s t ee n < B S p ring s@ p l ace r. ca .g ov>
S e nt: T hur s d ay
, M ay 22

, 2014 9 : 22 AM

T o: T o ng, St a nl ey
C c: Jo hn F inn e ll; T o dd Ni s hi ka w a ; Mo ll y J Jo hn s on
S u b j ec t: R E: PC A PC D N e g D ec s

- Q : Kr ac o n A ir c r a ft

S t a n :

W e v isi te d Kra c o n ye s t e r d a y

. T h e y d o , a nd p la n t o c o n t i nu e t o , p ai n t airc r af t

. W e ll-k e p t r e c o r d s s h o we d f o r cal e nd ar

ye ar 2 0 1 3 :

T o t a l VOC e m i ssi o n s : 4 4 0

. 5 l b

T o t a l g all o n s : c o a t i ng s

- - 6 6 g al ; s t ri pp e r

-- 2 2 9 g a l

Br u c e

F r o m: T o n g , S ta n l e y [ ma il t o : T o n g

. S ta n l e y @ e p a .g ov ]
S e n t: Mo n d a y , M a y 1 9

, 20 14 9: 4 8 A M
T o: Br u c e S pr i n gs tee n S u b j e c t: P C AP C D N e g D e c s - Q : K r a c o n A i r c r a f t

Br u c e ,

I ’ m s p o t c h e cki ng t h e n e g d e cs

. I d i dn ’ t s e e t h is c o m p a n y i n C A RB’s e m i ssi o n s d a t a b a s e f o r P C A P C D :

Krac o n A ircraf t R e fi n is h i ng 1 4 06 F li gh t li n e D r

. L i n c o l n , C A

h tt p : / / w ww

. k ra c o n. c o m /o u r .h tm

I f t h ey s t ill p ai n t ai r craf t

, d o t h e y e m i t > 2 5 t p y ?

T h a n ks

.

S t a n

___ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ __ S t a n ley T on g
U S E PA Re g io n I X

A ir D ivi s io n

- R u le s O f fice ( A I R 4 )

75 H aw t ho r n e S t

. S a n F r a nc i sco , CA 941 0 5

to n g

. s t a n ley @ e p a. g ov
415 947 4 122 ( w )

415 947 3 579 (f)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00043-CR

Kent Anthony Krueger, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2001-003, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Kent Anthony Krueger seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for retaliation. 

Sentence was imposed on April 24, 2001. Notice of appeal was filed on January 2, 2003, long after the 

time for perfecting appeal had expired. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Under the circumstances, we lack 

jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of 

jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 

519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
The appeal is dismissed.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: February 6, 2003

Do Not Publish
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Papua New Guinea Deputy Prime Minister Rosso

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Papua New Guinea Deputy Prime Minister Rosso									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 5, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with Papua New Guinea Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso today. The Deputy Secretary highlighted the United States’ strong partnership with PNG based on shared values and mutual priorities. Deputy Secretary Campbell also emphasized the importance of the Defense Cooperation Agreement and the Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability in demonstrating long-term U.S. commitment to Papua New Guinea. The Deputy Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister discussed ways to enhance the bilateral relationship between our two countries, especially in the economic and security sectors.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonPapua New Guinea

Back to Top
# C_2005318EN.01000702.xml

| 14.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3871 — RBC/Dexia/JV)

(2005/C 318/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3871. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3871. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005248EN.01000701.xml

| 7.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/7

---

Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ Programme (Decision No 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003, OJ L 176 of 15.7.2003)

(2005/C 248/07)

The European Commission is hereby launching a call for proposals for the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ 2005 work programme. The call is closing on 31 January 2006 for type 1 and type 2 actions (except COOPENER: 28 February 2006), and on 30 November 2005 and 28 April 2006 for type 3 actions.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects, is available at the following website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html

The helpdesk of the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ programme can be reached via e-mail: TREN-Intelligentenergy@cec.eu.int.

---
§ 405.921 Notice of initial determination. ( a ) *Notice of initial determination sent to the beneficiary.* ( 1 ) The notice must be written in a manner calculated to be understood by the beneficiary, and sent to the last known address of the beneficiary.
( 2 ) *Content of the notice.* The notice of initial determination must contain all of the following: ( i ) The reasons for the determination, including whether a local medical review policy, a local coverage determination, or national coverage determination was applied.
( ii ) The procedures for obtaining additional information concerning the contractor's determination, such as a specific provision of the policy, manual, law or regulation used in making the determination.
( iii ) Information on the right to a redetermination if the beneficiary is dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial determination and instructions on how to request a redetermination.
( iv ) Any other requirements specified by CMS.
( b ) *Notice of initial determination sent to providers and suppliers.* ( 1 ) An electronic or paper remittance advice (RA) notice is the notice of initial determination sent to providers and suppliers that accept assignment. ( i ) The electronic RA must comply with the format and content requirements of the standard adopted for national use by covered entities under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and related CMS manual instructions.
( ii ) When a paper RA is mailed, it must comply with CMS manual instructions that parallel the HIPAA data content and coding requirements.
( 2 ) The notice of initial determination must contain all of the following: ( i ) The basis for any full or partial denial determination of services or items on the claim.
( ii ) Information on the right to a redetermination if the provider or supplier is dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial determination.
( iii ) All applicable claim adjustment reason and remark codes to explain the determination.
( iv ) The source of the RA and who may be contacted if the provider or supplier requires further information.
( v ) All content requirements of the standard adopted for national use by covered entities under HIPAA.
( vi ) Any other requirements specified by CMS.
( c ) *Notice of initial determination sent to an applicable plan* — ( 1 ) *Content of the notice.* The notice of initial determination under § 405.924(b)(16) must contain all of the following: ( i ) The reasons for the determination.
( ii ) The procedures for obtaining additional information concerning the contractor's determination, such as a specific provision of the policy, manual, law or regulation used in making the determination.
( iii ) Information on the right to a redetermination if the liability insurance (including self-insurance), no-fault insurance, or workers' compensation law or plan is dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial determination and instructions on how to request a redetermination.
( iv ) Any other requirements specified by CMS.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 10617, Feb. 27, 2015]
#### WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. George CONNORS and Carlene E. Connors, Appellees.

No. 74-984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 21, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Raymond J. Hare, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Amarillo Mesquite Grill, Inc. for the fiscal
quarter ended July 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-2000
<CASH>                                         397,209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               888,050
<PP&E>                                      10,672,692
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,395,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,857,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,411,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,011
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,581,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,857,788
<SALES>                                      5,127,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,127,450
<CGS>                                        1,751,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,018,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Gary Lee DEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 3, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.