alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  FIRST                EQUITY PROPERTIES, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |   |   |
| Date:  | August                14, 2006                     | By: | /s/                Steven A. Abney     |
|   |                                               |   | Steven                A. Abney |
|   |                                               |   | Vice                President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                               |   |   |
|   |                                               |   |   |
|   |                                               |   |   |
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00042-CR

MONIQUE ANN MCGOWAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-CR-2329

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 22, 2013, appellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of 

possession of a controlled substance. In accordance with a plea bargain agreement 

with the State, the trial court deferred adjudication of appellant’s guilt and placed 

her on two years’ deferred-adjudication community supervision. On January 15, 

2015, the State filed a motion to adjudicate appellant’s guilt on the grounds that 

she violated the terms of her community supervision. After a plea of not true to the 

State’s motion, the trial court found at least one of the allegations true and 
2

adjudicated appellant’s guilt on December 17, 2015. The trial court assessed 

punishment at 180 days in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on December 17, 2015. 

On May 10, 2016, counsel for appellant filed a motion to withdraw appeal, 

alleging that appellant no longer wished to pursue this appeal. Counsel delivered a 

copy of the motion to appellant, but appellant failed to return a signed copy of the 

motion. Because appellant had not signed the motion, it did not comply with Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). On June 2, 2016, this court ordered a hearing 

to determine, among other things, whether appellant desired to pursue this appeal. 

On June 27, 2016, the trial court conducted the hearing, and the record of the 

hearing was filed in this court on June 29, 2016.

At the hearing, counsel appeared without appellant. According to counsel, 

appellant refused to appear because she had an outstanding warrant, which was 

confirmed by the State. However, counsel confirmed that he had discussed the 

issues with appellant and determined that appellant no longer wished to pursue her

appeal. Following the hearing, the trial court recommended the appeal be 

dismissed.

Appellant has not filed a compliant written motion to withdraw the appeal or 

a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). However, 

based upon the testimony of counsel at the hearing that appellant does not want to 

continue her appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation 

of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,700
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,001
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        104,226
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,198
<DEPOSITS>                                     170,039
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,006
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,476
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,012
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 198,198
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,015
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  438
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   525
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,978
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,888
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,090
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      903
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,501
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,501
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.15
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,220
<LOANS-PAST>                                       277
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,108
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,078
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,659
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,055
<RECOVERIES>                                       305
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,812
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,812
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Tkatchenko

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Tkatchenko							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

September 27, 2022

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman met today with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko in advance of the White House Pacific Island Country Summit. The Deputy Secretary congratulated the Foreign Minister on Papua New Guinea’s formation of a new government after its recent elections. They discussed our shared goal of strengthening our bilateral security relationship to ensure peace and security in the Indo-Pacific. The Deputy Secretary highlighted the U.S. commitment to work alongside Papua New Guinea to implement the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability. The Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister talked about our shared commitment to defending human rights and ending all forms of gender-based violence. They also discussed Russia’s unprovoked war in Ukraine.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonPapua New Guinea

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21672]



[[Page 46099]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XR46


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Vessel Monitoring System Committee (VMSC) will hold a working meeting, 
which is open to the public.

DATES: The VMSC meeting will be held Tuesday, October 6, 2009, from 10 
a.m. until business for the day is completed.

ADDRESSES: The VMSC meeting will be held at the Marriot Residence Inn, 
Portland Airport, Cascade Station, Mount Hood Room, 9301 NE Cascade 
Parkway, Portland, OR 97220; telephone: (503) 284-1800.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jim Seger, Staff Officer; 
telephone: (503) 820-2280.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the VMSC meeting is to review 
performance of the VMS program and develop recommendations that might 
be implemented through the 2011-12 biennial specifications process. No 
management actions will be decided by the VMSC. The VMSC's role will be 
development of recommendations to be provided for consideration by the 
Pacific Council at its November 2009 Costa Mesa, CA.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may come before the VMSC for discussion, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal VMSC action during this meeting. VMSC action will be 
restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any 
issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency 
action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the VMSC's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Ms. Carolyn Porter at (503) 820-2280 at least 5 
days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: September 3, 2009.
William D. Chappell,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-21672 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
HomeOffice of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Ethics and Financial Disclosure...Ethics and Financial Disclosure

# 									Ethics and Financial Disclosure							

Office of the Legal Adviser

The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Ethics and Financial Disclosure (L/EFD) advises the Department and its employees on ethics laws and regulations applicable to Executive branch employees. These rules govern, *inter alia*, employee acceptance of gifts, participation in outside activities, avoidance of conflicts of interest, avoidance of appearance of partiality, and seeking and post-government employment. The Office also advises on laws and policies related to employee participation in partisan political activities under the Hatch Act and related regulations. L/EFD manages the Department’s financial disclosure reporting program, including review and certification of the reports for Presidential Appointees and other OGE-278 and OGE-450 filers.

Per Pub. L. No. 112-105, §11, 126 Stat. 291, 298-300 (2012), *as amended by* Pub. L. No. 113-7, 127 Stat. 438 (2013), the financial disclosure reports for the Secretary of State and Deputy Secretaries of State are made available online via the Office of Government Ethics’ website.

The Office of Government Ethics also makes available via its website the financial disclosure reports of non-career Presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed Department filers. To obtain a copy of other Department filers’ public financial disclosure reports (OGE-278), individuals should fill out an OGE Form 201 and send the completed form to OGE201Request@state.gov or the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Ethics and Financial Disclosure, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street NW, Room 6332, Washington DC 20037.

View waivers of the administration’s ethics pledge (E.O. 13989).

Tags

FinanceLawLegal Adviser

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Commonwealth v. De Marco et al.

*Marvin, R. Halbert,*assistant district attorney, for Commonwealth.

' *Harry M. BerJcowitz*and *William A. Rahill,*for defendants. ■■ - ‘ -

December 8, 1954.

Kun, P. J.,

Defendants were jointly charged with' robbery. At the trial the County détective testified that the victim had been shown pictures from the “rogues’ gallery” and identified the picture of Cavalli, one of the defendants, as one of the persons who robbed him. The victim testified that both defendants and a third person robbed him. Cavalli was not represented by counsel at the trial, but counsel for De Marco informally represented Cavalli, and *292moved for the withdrawal of a juror. The motion was refused and this action of the court has been assigned as the main basis for a new trial, citing the case of Commonwealth v. Blose, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 165. While in the Blose case reference was made to a “penitentiary photograph”, which was held prejudicial, *requiring*a new trial, we cannot say that there is any substantial distinction between that term and the cerm “rogues’ gallery”, used in the instant case. Moreover, in an earlier case, Commonwealth v. Luccitti, 295 Pa. 190, it was stated at page 199: “The fact that photographs are from the rogue’s gallery should ordinarily he kept from the jury.”

The conviction was sustained in that case because, as stated in the opinion, there was nothing in the record to' indicate that the pictures came from the “rogues’ gallery”, and also the lower court stated that there were absolutely no markings on the pictures of any kind which would show that fact. In other words, there was no testimony before the jury that the pictures there involved came from the “rogues’ gallery”.

In the case before us, there was a direct statement that the picture involved came from the. “rogues’, gallery”. While that statement was with reference to defendant' Cavalli only, inasmuch as De Marcó was jointly indicted with Cavalli and was charged by the testimony with having participated in the robbery, the prejudicial effect of the reference to the “rogues’ gallery” must be held to have applied to him as well as to Cavalli. The conviction in this case rested entirely-on the identification, of defendants by the victim, and .there were no other corroborating circumstances.

■ In these circumstances, reference to the picture of one of defendants as coming from the “rogues’ gallery” ■must be held under the decisions referred to as having been of such a prejudicial nature as to require the granting of a new trial to defendants. ■
No. 16,921.

#### The Pennsylvania Co. *v.*The State.

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

*B. K. Elliott, W. F. Elliott*and *S. Stansifer,*for appellant.

*W. A. Keteham,*Attorney-General, for State.

Hackney, J.

This was an action for penalties incurred in failing to note upon blackboards the time for the arrival of trains at stations *699On the line of the appellant’s railway, as required hy the act of March 9th, 1889 (R. S. 1894, sections 5186,'5187). The questions here involved' are identical with- those involved in *Pennsylvania Co.*v. *State,*142 Ind. 428, and upon the authority of that ease the judgment of the’ circuit court in this case is affirmed.

Filed November 6, 1895.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Damour, Marie C- Republic of Fiji-Republic of Kiribati-Republic of Nauru – Kingdom of Tonga -Tuvalu – June 2022

# 									Damour, Marie C- Republic of Fiji-Republic of Kiribati-Republic of Nauru – Kingdom of Tonga -Tuvalu – June 2022							

Certificate of Competency

June 13, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:Republic of Fiji, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Nauru, Kingdom of Tonga, and Tuvalu

CANDIDATE:Marie C. Damour

Marie Damour is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor.  She currently serves as Consul General of the U.S. Consulate General in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.  Previously, Ms. Damour was the Director of the Office of Maritime Southeast Asian Affairs in the State Department’s Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs; Director of the Office of Policy Coordination and Public Affairs in the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs; and the Deputy Chief of Mission, as well as Chargé d’Affaires, a.i, at the U.S. Embassy in Wellington, New Zealand.  Over almost three decades of service, Ms. Damour has worked in five different regions of the world and served successfully in a variety of leadership and policy-making roles.  This experience, coupled with over a decade of service focused on East Asia and Pacific affairs, makes her a well-qualified candidate to serve as Ambassador to the Republics of Fiji, Kiribati, and Nauru as well as Tuvalu and the Kingdom of Tonga.

Among her other assignments, Ms. Damour was Minister Counselor for Consular Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil; the Chief of Non-Immigrant Visa Services and then Chief of Visa Services at the U.S. Embassy in London, England; and the Consular Chief at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, and the U.S. Consulate General in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.  She was also Desk Officer for Cambodia and Laos in the State Department and a Special Assistant in the Office of the Secretary of State in Washington, D.C., and had posts at the Embassies in Paris, France and Nouakchott, Mauritania.

Ms. Damour earned her B.A. from the College of William and Mary.  She speaks French, Vietnamese and Portuguese and is the recipient of multiple State Department performance awards as well as the Peacemaker Medal from the Government of Brazil.

 

Back to Top
#### Raul PALACIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-2471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 19, 1982.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1982.

Raul Palacio, in pro. per.

*1089Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raul Palacio, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
NO. 01

- 15 -00260- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT HOUSTON

JOAN DEYOUNG, STEPHEN DEYOUNG, M.D, AND DAVID DEYOUNG,

Appellants,

V.

Judy Page Maynard, William L. Maynard, Maynard Properties, L.P.,

Appellees.

FROM THE 270TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

L AW O FFICE OF G REGORY N. J ONES

By: /s/ Gregory N. Jones

SBN 10889450

2323 S. Shepherd, 14 th Fl.

Houston, Texas 77019

(713) 979

- 4691

(713) 979

- 4440

–

fax

Counsel for Appellees ACCEPTED

01-15-00260-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

11/18/2015 11:21:28 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2

As pointed out in Appellee’s last request for extension , Appellees’ counsel

has health issues having incurred several seizures. As a result of various

prescribed medications, counsel has been unable to completely

function, including driving until mid

- December 2015. When

coupled with the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday seasons

,

Appellees therefore respectfully request an extension of sixty ( 6 0) day s to file

their response brief in this appeal.

BACKGROUND FACTS

1. On March 19, 2015, the DeYoungs filed their notice of appeal. The

clerkʼs record was filed on June 16, 2015, the Appe llants’ brief was filed on August

17, 2015, which means that Appellees’ brief wa s due September 17, 2105. This

date was extended to November 19, 2015, as a result of Appellees’ previous

unopposed request for extension.

2. Appellees’ counsel ’s health condition has prevented Appellees’

counsel from devoting the necessary time and attention to their response brief

.3 PRAYER / RELIEF REQUESTED

For the foregoing reasons, Appellees request a n extension of at least 30

-

day the deadline to file their brief, or until January 19, 2016

.

Respectfully submitted,

L AW O FFICE OF G REGORY N. J ONES

/s/ Gregory N. Jones

Gregory N. Jones

2323 S. Shepherd, 14 th Fl.

Houston, Texas 77019

(713) 979

- 4691

(713) 979

- 4440

– fax

gjones@gnjlaw.net

Counsel for Appellees

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify to the Court that I have conferred with appellees’ counsel who

indicated that appellees are opposed to the relief sought by this motion.

/s/ Gregory N. Jones

Gregory N. Jones4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i), I certify to the Court that the

foregoing document contains 44 1 words. In calculating the word count, I relied

on the “Word Count” function of the computer program used to generate this

document.

/s/ Gregory N. Jones

Gregory N. Jones

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing document has been electronically served

on all counsel of record on November 18 th

, 2015:

/s/ Gregory N. Jones

Gregory N. Jones

Daniel W. Jackson, SBN 00796817 William L. Maynard

Scott K. Vastine, SBN 24056469 1300 Post Oak Blvd. S te . 2500

3900 Essex Lane, Suite 1116 Houston, Texas 77056

Houston, Texas 77027 Fax: (713) 960

- 1527

(713) 527

- 8850

– fax

daniel@jacksonlaw

- tx.com

scott@jacksonlaw

- tx.com
HomeMauritius

# Mauritius

48 items

        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Mauritius	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mauritius	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Department of State Celebrates Groundbreaking of New U.S. Embassy in Port Louis, Mauritius	  May 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Mauritian Leader of the Opposition Duval	  May 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Mauritian Prime Minister Jugnauth	  May 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Mauritian President Roopun	  May 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Travel to Mauritius, Comoros, and Seychelles	  May 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mauritius	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Sison’s Travel to Madagascar, South Africa, Mauritius, Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Laos	  March 20, 2023 

123…5next page

Back to Top
#### § 35.7 Admissions; designation of person to be notified.

Every in-patient, at the time of admission to the hospital or station or as soon thereafter as practicable, shall be requested to designate a person or persons to be notified in case of emergency.