alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, July 16, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00483-CR

____________

STEPHEN NOAH DAWKINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1331874

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 10, 2015. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Tammy Adams, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |   /s/ Paul D. Geraghty       |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and |   |
|   | Director                                    |   |
|   | Harleysville      National Corporation      |   |
|   | Date: March      12, 2010              |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.408 [Reserved]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 5568

_____________________________ S ONNY L EE S CALLION , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon , Judge

. November 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gener al, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         4330
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         51
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               7600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    12926
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         20352
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           20484
<LOANS>                                        48095
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 94924
<DEPOSITS>                                     84839
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            314
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3532
<OTHER-SE>                                     6194
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 94924
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5564
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               300
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7865
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4847
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  624
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1412
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 8.99
<LOANS-NON>                                    1695
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               1146
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                9189
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               599
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  112
<RECOVERIES>                                   108
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1219
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1219
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD LASSITER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CR-92-36-19-3-MU)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lassiter appeals from a district court order denying

his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion for reduction of his sentence. We

dismiss the appeal.

It is uncontested that Lassiter's initial sentence was within

the range set by the federal sentencing guidelines. And his sentence was halved when the district court reduced it on Government

motion. The order denying Lassiter's Rule 35 motion is not appealable. United States v. Pridgen, 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir.

1995).

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2005182EN.01003303.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-440/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 182/60)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 4 April 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-440/03: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
#### § 137.450 Does the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) apply to appeals under this subpart?

Yes, EAJA claims against the Department will be heard pursuant to 25 CFR 900.177.
### NATRON A COUNT Y COMMISSIONER S 20 0 N
. CENTE R ST , RM
. 11 5 CASPER , W Y 8260 1 PHON E (307 ) 235-920 2 FA X (307 ) 235-948 6 E d Opell a Chainna n Bil l McDowel l Vic e Chairma n Rober t Hendr y Mat t Keatin g Ten y Wlngerte r

.. o Jul y 27 , 201 1

Alox aLe y Associat e Directo r Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Smal l Community Program , W86-31 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra m Dear Ms
. Ley : Th e Natron aCounty , Wyomin g Boar do f Coxmt y Commissioner s offer s thi s lette r o f support for th e Casper/Natron aCounty Internationa l Airport' s (C/NCIA ) Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Programgran t

application
. Natron aCounty' s isolate dlocatio n make s affordabl e ai r transportatio n vita l t o th e loca l economy , bot h t o support ou r thrivin g energ y industr y an dt o provid e reasonabl e leisur e trave l opportunitie s for

ou r citizens
. W e feel i t i s importan t

t o increas e th e numbe r

o f flights an dcapacit y o f

th e Casper/Natron aCoimt

y Internationa l Airport

t o mee t th e growin g demand s an d expansio n o f

th e loca l busines s industry
. Additionally , th e resultin g lowe r fare s shoul d lea dt o increase dactivit y i n ou r touris t industry
. Sincerely , rn3t 3

EdOpella,T::siafflna

n 

### NATRON ACOUNT Y BOAR D O F COUNT Y COMMISSIONERS

### TOW N O F MIDWES T Hom e o f th e Sal t Creek Oi l Fiel d TDDm^ Y 800-877-996 5 EQUA L OPPORTUNIT

Y PROGRA M E-MAIL : midwest@rtconnect.ne t Phon e 307/437-651 3 Fa x307/437-651 4 P.O

. Bo x 19 0 Midwest , Wyomin g 8264 3 

# KiSTM ^ Augusts , 201 1
Aloh aLe y Associat e Directo r Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Smal l Community Program , W86-31 0 120 0 New Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , DC
. 2059 0 Re : Smal l Community Air Servic e Grran

t Casper/Natron aCounty Int' l Airport Casper , Wyomin g
Th e Midwes t

Tow n Counci l o f

Midwest , Wyomin g woul dlik e t o offe r thei r suppor t for th e Caspe r

Internationa l Airport

applyin g fo r

th e SCAS D Grant
. Increase dservice s an d marketin g assistanc e fo r

ou r local airport

i s very important
. Casper/Natron aCounty Int' l Airport serve s avas t

are ao f Wyomin g becaus e o f

th e distance s betwee n eac h town . I t i s s o convenien t t o b e abl e t o fly ou t

o f Caspe r rathe r tha n trave l t o Sal t

Lak e City o r

Denve r t o mak e a connectin g flight. Increase dservice s woul dincreas e th e airport s serve dfor th e custome r

an d decreas e th e cos t

o f tickets
. Than k yo u fo r you r consideration
. Sincerely ,

Doll y Harrison , Clerk/Treasure r

cc : Glen n Januska , AAE , Casper/Natron aCo
. Int' l Airport
HomeSpain

# Spain

124 items

        -    TIAS  		Spain (11-317) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on the Mars Science Laboratory Mission	  March 17, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (10-921) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 21, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (10-201.47) – Instrument Amending the Treaty of November 20, 1990 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (10-201-21) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Extradition of May 29, 1970, and the Supplementary Treaties of January 25, 1975, February 9, 1988, and March 12, 1996	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (05-107) – Agreement Extending the Agreement of October 27, 1994 for Educational, Cultural and Scientific Cooperation	  January 7, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (04-305) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  March 5, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (03-1117.1) – Scientific Cooperation Agreement for the NASA Tracking Station	  November 17, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (02-228) – Agreement for Research, Development, Tests, Evaluation, Production and Life-Cycle Support Activities for Technologies and Systems for AEGIS-Equipped Ships	  February 28, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (13064) – Agreement for the Promotion of Aviation Safety	  September 23, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (12949) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  May 5, 1998 

previous page1…10111213next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 11


                  BROAD NATIONAL BANCORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>

                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                      1996     1995(1)   1994(1)
                                         (Dollars In Thousands,
                                        Except Per Share Amounts)
<CAPTION>
<S>                                          <C>                  <C>           <C>
PRIMARY:
  Average number of common shares
     outstanding. . . . . . . . .            4,561,066            3,245,081      3,164,227
  Assumed exercise of options outstanding       88,712               56,641          4,164
  Average number of common shares and
     common share equivalents outstanding    4,649,778            3,301,722      3,168,391

  Net income  . . . . . . . . . .           $5,273,146           $4,419,660     $4,688,711
  Less:  Cumulative Preferred Dividends. . .         0              579,548        613,933
  Net income available to common
     shareholders . . . . . . . .           $5,273,146           $3,840,112     $4,074,778

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: . . . .  $     1.13           $     1.16     $     1.29

ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
  Average number of common shares
     outstanding. . . . . . . . .            4,561,066            3,245,081      3,164,227
  Assumed exercise of options outstanding      120,102               68,192         17,396
  Assumed conversion of preferred shares       110,067            1,421,305      1,494,400
  Adjusted average number of common
     shares outstanding . . . . .            4,791,235            4,734,578      4,676,023
  Net income. . . . . . . . . . .           $5,273,146           $4,419,660     $4,688,711

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: . .$     1.10           $     0.93     $     1.00

</TABLE>


(1)  All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the 10%
     stock dividend which was distributed October 3, 1996.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      5,475,100
<SECURITIES>                                  250,900         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,753,800 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,768,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,400
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,724,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,768,100
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              165,300
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,200)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               165,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           165,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  165,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.92
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,167
<SECURITIES>                                     4,680
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,023
<PP&E>                                          28,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,703
<BONDS>                                            100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,444
<SALES>                                         15,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,366
<CGS>                                            6,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>
§ 136.415 What rights does an individual have during this process? ( a ) The individual must be provided an opportunity to explain, deny, or refute unfavorable and incorrect information gathered in an investigation, before the adjudication is final. He/she should receive a written summary of all derogatory information and be informed of the process for explaining, denying, or refuting unfavorable information.
( b ) The adjudicating officials must not release the actual background investigative report to an individual. However, they may issue a written summary of the derogatory information.
( c ) The individual who is the subject of a background investigation may request, to the extent permissible by law, a copy of the reports from the originating (Federal, State, or other Tribal) agency and challenge the accuracy and completeness of any information maintained by that agency.
( d ) The results of an investigation cannot be used for any purpose other than to determine eligibility for employment in a position that involves regular contact with or control over Indian children.
( e ) Investigative reports contain information of a highly personal nature and must be maintained confidentially and secured in locked files. Investigative reports must be seen only by those officials who, in performing their official duties, need to know the information contained in the report.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jim WILLIAMS.

No. 61598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1978.*

Anthony D. Ragusa, Jr., Port Sulphur, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leander H. Perez, Jr., Dist. Atty., Gilbert V. Andry, III, Leonce J. Malus, III, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 TATE, J., would grant a rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

The' defendant was convicted after a trial by jury of armed robbery, a violation of R.S. 14:64, and was sentenced to thirty years imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. Upon this appeal the defendant relies on thirteen assignments of error for a reversal of his conviction and sentence. We find no merit in the assignments of error.1

*893Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

SUMMERS, J., concurs.

1

. The errors assigned by the defendant are as follows:

> 1 and 2. The court erred in denying the motion to quash which urged that the petit jury was improperly constituted.

> 3. The court erred in granting the State’s challenge for cause of a prospective juror.

> 4. The court erred in denying defense challenges for cause of two prospective jurors.

> 5.The court erred in denying a mistrial motion based on a State’s witness’ allusion to other crimes of which the defendant was accused.

> 6 and 7. The court erred in allowing the introduction of certain physical evidence.

> 8. The court erred in denying a motion for directed verdict.

> 9. The court erred in allowing evidence of a prior criminal act of a defense witness.

> *89310. The court’s jury instruction concerning accomplice testimony was erroneous.

> 11. The court erroneously allowed the jury to view documentary and physical evidence after it had retired to deliberate.

> 12. There was insufficient evidence to convict the defendant of armed robbery.

> 13. The court erred in denying the motion for new trial which reurged matters which were the subject of earlier objections.