alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000726294
<NAME> BELMONT BANCORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,121
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,790
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,677
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        132,511
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,210
<DEPOSITS>                                     224,516
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,590
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,738
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,788
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 272,210
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,271
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,922
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   157
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,766
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,023
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,327
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      242
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    671
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,096
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,096
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.66
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,531
<LOANS-PAST>                                       102
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 17,397
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,878
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,616
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,682
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,682
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            540


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Swiss State Secretary Leu

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Swiss State Secretary Leu							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 21, 2023

The below is attributable to Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman spoke with Swiss State Secretary Livia Leu today.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and State Secretary Leu reaffirmed the strength and depth of the bilateral relationship between the United States and Switzerland.  The Deputy Secretary and State Secretary also discussed our shared support for Ukraine and cooperation on sanctions and information sharing.  They looked forward to the next session of the U.S.-Switzerland Strategic Partnership Dialogue.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonSwitzerland

Back to Top
#### § 1005.19 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ will fix the time for filing such briefs which are not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
#### § 597.314 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

#### § 405.1881 Appointment of representative.

A provider or other party may be represented by legal counsel or any other person it appoints to act as its representative at the proceedings, conducted in accordance with §§ 405.1819 and 405.1851.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           10272
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     165485
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         200063
<ALLOWANCE>                                       6932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  398955
<DEPOSITS>                                      279682
<SHORT-TERM>                                      5463
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3200
<LONG-TERM>                                      91021
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                       18268
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  398955
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9173
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4830
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 14089
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5639
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8346
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5743
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     7606
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (17)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5710)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (3554)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3554)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                       9963
<LOANS-PAST>                                        19
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   9927
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     6429
<RECOVERIES>                                       280
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 6932
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              6932
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, *against*Paul Madden *et*al., Appellants.

(Decided February 10th, 1890.)

Judgment on a forfeited recognizance will be set aside, where the principal appeared on the return day, though after forfeiture of bail, and was found guilty on his confession, and paid the fine imposed, and the people have lost no rights, and all costs have been paid.

Application to vacate a judgment on a forfeited recognizance.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*H. Hartman,*for the motion.

*Tohn H. Fellows,*opposed.

Per Curiam.

[Present, Larremore, Ch. J., Bookstaver and Bischoff, JJ.]. Madden was arrested for violation of the excise laws and held to bail in $100. On January 13th, 1890, the case was called for trial in the Court of Special Sessions, and upon Madden’s failure to appear, the bail was declared forfeited, and judgment entered against the surety on the following day. Later in the same day on which the forfeiture occurred, Madden appeared for trial, and upon his confession was adjudged guilty, and fined $50, which was *64immediately paid. It also appears from the certificates of the district attorney and deputy sheriff that the people have lost no rights, and that all expense incurred by such forfeiture has been paid.

The application should be granted.

Order accordingly.
#### § 137.340 May a Self-Governance Tribe contribute funding to a project?

Yes, the Self-Governance Tribe and the Secretary may jointly fund projects. The construction project agreement should identify the Secretarial amount and any Tribal contribution amount that is being incorporated into the construction project agreement. The Self-Governance Tribe does not have to deposit its contribution with the Secretary.
698 A.2d 60

#### Lisa VARALLI and Anthony Varalli, Appellants v. Oh Joon KWON and Dennis Kwon, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Jan. 29,1997.

Decided Aug. 19, 1997.

Randolph C. Smith, and John K. Weston, Philadelphia, for Appellants.

Andrew L. Riemenschneider, and Michael Saltzburg, Philadelphia, for Appellees.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 1997, we dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                        <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                          683,321
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   123,446
<ALLOWANCES>                    (2,976)
<INVENTORY>                     573,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,727,488
<PP&E>                          1,166,081
<DEPRECIATION>                  643,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,318,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           881,021
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     100
<COMMON>                        221,420
<OTHER-SE>                      315,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,318,632
<SALES>                         1,725,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,725,035
<CGS>                           1,186,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,587,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              131,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (830,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (494,342)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,324,469)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,324,469)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
HomeVietnam

# Vietnam

190 items

        -    Other Release  		IRFBA Chair’s statement on Uyghur religious prisoner of conscience, Dr. Gulshan Abbas	  October 20, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Hanoi, Vietnam: United Nations International School of Hanoi: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Launches Coalition for Climate Entrepreneurship (CCE) Hub in Hanoi, Vietnam	  September 29, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Conviction and Sentencing of Vietnamese NGO Leader Hoang Thi Minh Hong	  Matthew MillerSeptember 28, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		IRFBA Chair’s Statement on Vietnamese Religious Prisoners of Conscience: Lê Tùng Vân, Lê Thanh Trùng Dương, Lê Thanh Hoàn Nguyên, Lê Thanh Nhất Nguyên, Cao Thị Cúc, and Lê Thanh Nhị Nguyên	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Marc E. Knapper, U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania, National Security Council	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		New Partnership with Vietnam to Explore Semiconductor Supply Chain Opportunities	  September 11, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		 U.S. Security Cooperation With Vietnam	  September 11, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Ukraine, India, and Vietnam, September 6-11, 2023	   
        -    Press Statement  		Vietnam National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 2, 2023 

previous page12345…19next page

Back to Top
#### H. A. JOHNSON, Jr. v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

No. 51926.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 20, 1980.

Smith, McLemore & Smith, James E. Smith, Carthage, for appellant.

Robert N. Brooks, Dist. Atty., Carthage, for appellee.

Appeal from Special Court of Eminent Domain, Leake County; Marcus D. Gordon, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.5 Other applicable rules. The following other rules of this chapter set forth additional policies and procedures applicable to four of the kinds of services covered under the SMI program: ( a ) Part 494: End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities.
( b ) Part 405, Subpart X: Rural Health Clinic and Federally Qualified Health Center services.
( c ) Part 416: Ambulatory Surgical Center services.
( d ) Part 493: Laboratory Services.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 7134, Feb. 28, 1992; 57 FR 24981, June 12, 1992; 73 FR 20474, Apr. 15, 2008]
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Maurice DIGGS.

No. 81-K-0342.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1981.

In re Maurice Diggs, applying for remedial writs and stay order. Parish of Orleans. No. 269-958.

Denied.
# C_2005217EN.01004501.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/45

---

Action brought on 9 June 2005 by Francisco Rossi Ferreras against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-222/05)

(2005/C 217/98)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 June 2005 by Francisco Rossi Ferreras, resident in Luxembourg, represented by Gilles Bounéou and Frédéric Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 22 July 2004 confirming the career development report for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 and, as a subsidiary claim, therefore annul the career development report (CDR) for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 22 July 2004 confirming the career development report for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 and, as a subsidiary claim, therefore annul the career development report (CDR) for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003;

| — | award the applicant the sum, subject to any amendment or increase, of EUR 100 000 (one hundred thousand euros) for non-pecuniary damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

award the applicant the sum, subject to any amendment or increase, of EUR 100 000 (one hundred thousand euros) for non-pecuniary damage;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official, challenges his career development report for the assessment year 2003 by alleging infringement of Articles 5, 7 and 43 of the Staff Regulations and a manifest error of assessment. He also claims to be the victim of harassment at work by his senior.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 10.20

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made as of
November 18, 1996, between Somanetics Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), and Raymond W. Gunn ("Employee").

                                    RECITALS

        A. Employee and the Company entered into the Employment Agreement,
dated as of December 1, 1992, as amended February 23, 1994, July 21, 1994, and
December 1, 1995 (the "Agreement").

        B. Employee and the Company desire to renew and amend the Agreement.

        THEREFORE, Company and Employee agree as follows:

        1. Amendment.  Effective before the expiration of the term of
Employee's employment under the Agreement, the first sentence of Section 2 of
the Agreement is replaced with the following:  "The term of Employee's
employment under this Agreement shall begin on the date first written above and
shall continue for five years, unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section
4."

        2. No Other Change.  Except as modified by this Amendment, the
Agreement shall continue in full force according to its terms and is hereby
ratified.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have executed this
Amendment as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph of this
Amendment.


                                         SOMANETICS CORPORATION


                                         By:
                                             ----------------------------

                                                Its:
                                                     --------------------



                                         --------------------------------
                                         RAYMOND W. GUNN
No. 00-5797.

#### Derenak *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 3.208 Continued protection of patient safety work product. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, patient safety work product disclosed in accordance with this subpart, or disclosed impermissibly, shall continue to be privileged and confidential.
( b ) ( 1 ) Patient safety work product disclosed for use in a criminal proceeding pursuant to section 922(c)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299b-22(c)(1)(A), and/or pursuant to § 3.206(b)(1) of this subpart continues to be privileged, but is no longer confidential.
( 2 ) Non-identifiable patient safety work product that is disclosed is no longer privileged or confidential and not subject to the regulations under this part.
( 3 ) Paragraph (b) of this section applies only to the specific patient safety work product disclosed.
40876.

#### HERSHORIN v. LAVISTA, INC.

Jordan, Judge.

The plaintiff’s petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to it in the sum of $660 for rent under the provisions of a contract of lease executed by the parties, a copy of which was attached to the petition as an exhibit. The defendant filed his answer and a plea of non est factum in which he denied that the lease contract sued upon had been made, signed or executed by him or by anyone acting in his behalf. Upon the trial of the case and after hearing evidence, the trial court entered an order overruling the defendant’s plea of non est factum, and thereafter directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict predicated upon his previous motion for a directed verdict and a motion for new trial. The exception is to the denial of these motions. *Held:*

The overruling of the defendant’s plea of non est factum constituted an adjudication that the defendant had executed the instrument sued upon under the terms of which the defendant leased apartment number “115” at 1115 LaVista Road, N. E., Atlanta, Georgia, for a term of one year at a monthly consideration of $165; and there being no exception *436to this judgment, it became the law of the case. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case demanded a finding that the defendant had vacated the leased premises with four months of the term still outstanding and that the rental for these four months was due and unpaid. The evidence also demanded a finding that the plaintiff, acting as lessee’s agent as authorized under the terms of the lease agreement, had shown the vacant apartment to all prospective tenants seeking such accommodations, to no avail; and had thus exercised “reasonable effort,” as provided in the lease, to rent the vacant apartment during the remainder of the term of the lease. A verdict was thus demanded for the plaintiff, and the trial court did not err in directing same, and in denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and his motion for new trial, none of the grounds of either motion being meritorious.

Decided October 8, 1964.

*Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, Robert A. Eisner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Claude Hambrick,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and, Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 407.14 Initial enrollment period. ( a ) *Duration.* ( 1 ) The initial enrollment period is the 7-month period that begins 3 months before the month an individual first meets the eligibility requirements of § 407.10 and ends 3 months after that first month of eligibility.
( 2 ) In determining the initial enrollment period of an individual who is age 65 or over and eligible for enrollment solely because of entitlement to hospital insurance, the individual is considered as first meeting the eligibility requirements for SMI n the first day he or she becomes entitled to hospital insurance or would have been entitled if he or she filed an application for that program.
( b ) *Deemed initial enrollment period.* ( 1 ) SSA or CMS will establish a deemed initial enrollment period for an individual who fails to enroll during the initial enrollment period because of a belief, based on erroneous documentary evidence, that he or she had not yet attained age 65. The period will be established as though the individual had attained age 65 on the date indicated by the incorrect information.
( 2 ) A deemed initial enrollment period established under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is used to determine the individual's premium and right to enroll in a general enrollment period if that is advantageous to the individual.
# Georgia

154 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 17, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 17, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 16, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 16, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 15, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 15, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024European Commission HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Press Statement  		Georgian Draft Legislation	  Matthew MillerApril 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Tbilisi, Georgia: QSI International School of Tbilisi: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Armenia and Georgia	  January 14, 2024 

previous page1234…16next page

Back to Top