alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.93




 Exhibit 4.93 

POWER OF ATTORNEY 
 I, Shanshan Cui, a
citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “ PRC”) with ID No. and a shareholder holding 50% equity interests of Beijing Perusal Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Perusal”), hereby irrevocably authorizes,
pursuant to the Proxy Agreement dated hereof between me and Baidu, Inc., as well as by designation of Baidu, Inc., Shanshan Cui with the following powers and rights in respect of my existing and future equity holding in Beijing Perusal (“My
Equity”) during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Shanshan Cui is hereby authorized as my sole and exclusive agent to exercise on my behalf
all of my rights as a shareholder to vote at shareholders’ meetings of Beijing Perusal in accordance with PRC laws and the articles of Beijing Perusal, including without limitation the right to sell or transfer any or all of My Equity, and to
designate and appoint the general manager of Beijing Perusal as my authorized representative at the shareholders’ meeting of Beijing Perusal. 
 Such
authorization is premised on the condition that Shanshan Cui is an employee of Baidu, Inc. and its affiliates, and Baidu, Inc. agrees to such authorization. Once Shanshan Cui’s employment with Baidu, Inc. and its affiliates terminates, or I am
notified by Baidu, Inc. to terminate such authorization, I will withdraw the authorization made hereunder immediately and designate/authorize any other person nominated by Baidu, Inc. to exercise all of my rights as a shareholder to vote at
shareholders’ meetings of Beijing Perusal. 
 Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, this Power of Attorney is irrevocable and continues to have
effect as of the date hereof as long as I holds equity interests in Beijing Perusal. 
  

			
	(Signature):	 	 /s/ Shanshan Cui

	
	Date: October 30, 2019
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 2231

In re: DARRIUS A. HEUSER

- WHITAKER , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk . ( 2:18

- cr - 00177

- RAJ

- LRL

- 4 )

Submitted : March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Darrius A. Heuser

- Whitaker , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-2231 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Federal prisoner Darrius Heuser

- Whitaker (“Petitioner”) has filed an original and a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus asking this c ourt to order Senior United States District Court Judge Raymond Jackson to either (1) grant Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion; or (2) answer Petitioner’s “Affidavit for Peremptory Mandamus to Depose Witness” (“Affidavit”). We conclude that Petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently ruled on Petitioner’s § 2255 motion. In doing so, the district court rejected Petitioner’s habeas claim predicated on a statement that was the impetus for the Affidavit. W e therefore deny the mandamus petition s as moot . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-2231 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2006022EN.01002504.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/25

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2005 — Siegfried Krahl v Commission

(Case T -179/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 22/48)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 7.8.2004.

1

---
# C_2005217EN.01006201.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/62

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-51/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/122)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-51/97 G J Meijer v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities be removed from the register.

G J Meijer

Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997.

1

---
# C_2005217EN.01006302.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/63

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-59/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/129)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-59/97, A. Lukens Folkers v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997

1

---
# C_2005257EN.01000302.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 of San Sebastián (Spain) by order of that court of 6 July 2005 in Yolanda Del Cerro Alonso v Osakidetza (Servicio Vasco de Salud) (Basque Health Service)

(Case C-307/05)

(2005/C 257/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 of San Sebastián (Spain) of 6 July 2005, received at the Court Registry on 4 August 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Yolanda Del Cerro Alonso and Osakidetza (Servicio Vasco de Salud) (Basque Health Service) on the following questions:

| 1. | Where Directive 1999/70/EC (1) provides that fixed-term workers are not be treated in a less favourable manner than comparable permanent workers, does this also refer to remuneration? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where Directive 1999/70/EC (1) provides that fixed-term workers are not be treated in a less favourable manner than comparable permanent workers, does this also refer to remuneration?

1

If the answer is affirmative:

| 2. | Is the fact that Article 44 of Law 55/2003 of 16 December 2003 of the Framework Statute for Statutory Workers in the Health Service provides that temporary workers are not entitled to the length of service allowance recognised for permanent workers an adequate and objective reason? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the fact that Article 44 of Law 55/2003 of 16 December 2003 of the Framework Statute for Statutory Workers in the Health Service provides that temporary workers are not entitled to the length of service allowance recognised for permanent workers an adequate and objective reason?

| 3. | Are the agreements concluded between the staff unions and the administration adequate and objective reasons for not recognising the length of service allowance for temporary workers? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Are the agreements concluded between the staff unions and the administration adequate and objective reasons for not recognising the length of service allowance for temporary workers?

---

(1)  Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ L 175, of 10/07/1999 p. 43).

1

---
#### § 35.45 Disposition of effects; exceptions.

Irrespective of the provisions of this subpart, the officer in charge may (a) release from among the effects of the deceased patient so much of the patient's clothing as may be necessary for use in preparation of his body for burial and (b) cause to be destroyed, or otherwise disposed of, such used toilet articles of the patient as appear to have no commercial or other value.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 18, 2016

No. 04-16-00106-CR

Ramon CASTILLO Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR6729

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file brief is granted. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
p.1 

OAR Box 1837 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

178) IV-E-12 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:12 PM Sheet 178 of 238 
^

osr % 

P.2 

% 

WBy UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\t. —*sFr WASHINGTON, D.C. 2046 0 4i.rWS&J 

May 22, 1987 

OFFICE OF 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Industry Representatives, May 15, 1987 

FROM: Gregory B. Foote 

Attorney 

Air and Radiation Division (LE-132A) 

TO: Central Docket Section (LE-131) 

Docket No. A-84-33 

On May 5, 1987 representatives of EPA met with representatives of the American Mining Congress (AMC) and National 

Coal Association (NCA) to discuss the above-referenced rulemaking proposal to "list" surface coal mines (SCMs). 

At the meeting, industry representatives stated their 

belief that the rulemaking record would not support a decision 

by EPA to adopt either Alternative IV or the prospective 

variations of it discussed in a May 4, 1987 memorandum from 

Kirt Cox, Project Officer, to the Docket and other addressees. 

AMC and NCA asked whether EPA, in reaching its final decision, 

would rely on the various Department of Interior authorities 

which address air pollution from SCMs. EPA representatives 

replied that the matter was under consideration, but in any 

event, a final decision would be based on the record. 

Meeting participants discussed the possibility of using 

a combined distance/visibility screening model test as a 

basis for triggering an air quality impact analysis, under 

some modification of alternative IV, given the importance of 

visibility benefits in EPA's regulatory impact analysis of 

Alternative IV. Industry representatives expressed the view 

that if visibility was the predominant benefit of PSD review, 

the absence of an adverse visibility impact should preclude 

the need to consider other air quality related values. 

EPA representatives agreed to consider the use of 

visibility screening in some fashion in deciding whether PSD 

would apply to an SCM. AMC and NCA agreed to respond in 

writing to EPA's May 4, memorandum by May 22, 1987.
#### SOUTH FLORIDA BUSINESS NEGOTIATORS, INC., Appellant, v. Stanley LERNER and Stanley Saul, Appellees.

No. 74-1356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 11, 1975.

Robert J. Lewison, Miami, for appellant.

M. Mark Margulies and George J. Bolton, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Port Everglades Terminal Company, Inc. v. Trans-Continental Traffic Service Bureau, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 501.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3171

To limit the procurement of aircraft landing gear by the Secretary of Defense

to landing gear that is manufactured and assembled in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 1996

Mr. HOKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

To limit the procurement of aircraft landing gear by the

Secretary of Defense to landing gear that is manufactured and assembled in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF AIRCRAFT

4 LANDING GEAR.

5 (a) ADDITION OF AIRCRAFT LANDING GEAR TO DO6 MESTIC SOURCE LIMITATION.—Section 2534 of title 10,

7 United States Code, is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the

9 following new paragraph:
2

•HR 3171 IH

1 ‘‘(6) LANDING GEAR.—Landing gear for air2 craft.’’; and

3 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the

4 following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(4) LANDING GEAR.—In the case of a procure6 ment of landing gear referred to in subsection

7 (a)(6), a manufacturer meets the requirements of

8 this subsection only if—

9 ‘‘(A) the manufacturer meets the require10 ment set forth in paragraph (1); and

11 ‘‘(B) the landing gear is manufactured and

12 assembled in the United States.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsections (a)(6) and

14 (b)(4) of section 2534 of title 10, United States Code, as

15 added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to con16 tracts entered into after September 30, 1996.

Æ
No. 99-368.

#### Wilson *v.*Area Plan Commission of Evansville and Vanderburgh County et al.

Ct. App. Ind. Cer-tiorari denied.
From:   Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US  

To:   "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:   Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon

Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve  Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA  

Date:   04/09/2010 09:24 AM  

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Hi Heidi,

I recall that you wanted more information about the contribution of mercury

emissions from various source categories and the total. The EPA's 2008 Report on

the Environment (ROE) presented this type of information. For example, attached

below is a graph (that is available at the EPA website).This graph shows the

contributions of mercury emissions for various categories for various years. The

link for the ROE website is provided below. If you go to the website, you can

click on the "mercury emissions" link to get more information on the emissions

sources, estimates, etc..The website address is as follows:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank You.

Chuck

(See attached file: Mercury‐emissions‐from‐EPA‐ROE‐2008.gif)
§ 6.13 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the agency against which an award is sought shall file an answer to the application.
( b ) If agency counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 60 days and further extensions may be granted by the adjudicative officer upon request by agency counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of agency counsel's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, agency counsel shall include with the answer supporting affidavits.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Named 2020 Government Employer of the Year   by CAREERS& the disABLED Magazine

# 									Department of State Named 2020 Government Employer of the Year   by CAREERS& the disABLED Magazine							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 29, 2021

The U.S. Department of State is dedicated to advancing workforce diversity, and we are proud to announce that for the second straight year *CAREERS & the disABLED Magazine*has recognized the Department with its Government Employer of the Year award for the Department’s commitment to empowering employees with disabilities.  The December 2020 issue of the magazine also features a written interview of Kim L. Davis, a Reasonable Accommodations Analyst in the Bureau of Global Talent Management’s Office of Accessibility and Accommodations.

As the federal government’s largest foreign affairs agency, the Department of State works to promote peace and stability, helps to develop thriving economies, and provides Consular services to U.S. citizens and foreign nationals worldwide.

In pursuit of its goal to remain an employer of choice, the Department opened its Access Center in December 2020, a state-of-the-art facility that provides cutting-edge assistive technology solutions to Department employees with disabilities.  The Access Center serves as a showcase for accessibility best practices, for the federal government as well as the diplomatic community and foreign missions in Washington, D.C.  As a result, the center will have a global impact on individuals with disabilities.

The 2020 Government Employer of the Year award recognizes the Department of State’s long-term commitment to ensuring its workforce represents the diversity of America.

*Visit careers.state.gov to learn more about Foreign and Civil Service careers, the Consular Fellows Program, and internship opportunities.  Connect with DOSCareers on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram.*

Tags

Bureau of Global Talent ManagementDisabilityOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, d/b/a 7-Eleven Food Stores, Inc., Appellant, v. Thomas ROSE, Jr., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 74-555.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 6, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|      | 
|Name: |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | May 8, 2006
HomeAngola

# Angola

92 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan President Lourenço	  May 5, 2022 
        -    		Travel to South Africa, Angola, Gabon, and France, May 2-7, 2022	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to South Africa, Angola, Gabon, and France	  April 29, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Angola	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Supporting a Credible Local Election Environment in Angola	  February 24, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Angola National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 10, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Angola	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Angola	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Angola	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Angola	  May 12, 2021 

previous page1…5678910next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CEO PURSUANT TO 18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350

CERITFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PurchaseSoft, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven A. Flagg, President of the Company, certify, solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/STEVEN A. FLAGGSteven A. Flagg, President and Acting CEO |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated January 10, 2003                                      |  | 

---

QuickLinks
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 23 61

_____________________________
J ONATHAN L EE T HOMAS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ircuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

. August 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Akcapar

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Akcapar									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 8, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt M. Campbell met today with Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Burak Akcapar in Washington.  Deputy Secretary Campbell and Deputy Foreign Minister Akcapar discussed ways to further enhance U.S.-Türkiye strategic cooperation on regional and global priorities.  The two focused on economic cooperation in Central Asia, peace in the South Caucasus, and other opportunities to work together in Asia and beyond.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyOffice of the SpokespersonTurkey

Back to Top