alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeFisheries Status Lists...4. Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea, done at Washington June 16,1994.

# 									4. Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea, done at Washington June 16,1994.							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force December 8, 1995.

In accordance with Article XVI, paragraph 2, the Convention entered into force on the thirtieth day following the date on which at least four signatory States, including the Russian Federation and the United States of America, which are the coastal States of the Bering Sea, deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval with the Depositary [the United States of America].

In accordance with Article XVI, paragraph 3, the Convention entered into force for each of the other signatory States on the thirtieth day following the date of deposit of that State’s instrument of ratification, acceptance, or approval. Article XVI, paragraph 4 of the Convention provides that, after entry into force of this Convention, the Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite other States whose nationals and fishing vessels wish to conduct fishing for pollock in the Convention Area to become Parties to this Convention. This Convention shall enter into force for any such other State on the thirtieth day following the date of deposit of the State’s instrument of accession.
Download Status List						 [108 KB]

Tags

FisheriesMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Irvin E. WILLIAMS v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson.

No. 80-KH-2540.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 21, 1980.

In re Irvin E. Williams, applying for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari. Parish of Jefferson. No. 74r-215.

Denied.
#### Raul E. CUERVO, and Ilena M. Cuervo, his wife, Appellants, v. Elizabeth EATON et al., Appellees.

No. 74-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                                       OF
                                BELMONT BANCORP.

                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of Belmont Bancorp. (the "Registrant"). This Certification is
made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.

We certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant.

This Certification is executed as of August 9, 2002. /s/ Wilbur R. Roat
                                                     ------------------
                                                     President & Chief Executive
                                                     Officer

                                                     /s/ Jane R. Marsh
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Principal Financial
                                                     and Accounting Officer
§ 419.21 Hospital services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system. Except for services described in § 419.22, effective for services furnished on or after July 1, 2000, payment is made under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system for the following: ( a ) Medicare Part B services furnished to hospital outpatients designated by the Secretary under this part.
( b ) Services designated by the Secretary that are covered under Medicare Part B when furnished to hospital inpatients who are either not entitled to benefits under Part A or who have exhausted their Part A benefits but are entitled to benefits under Part B of the program.
( c ) Partial hospitalization services and intensive outpatient services furnished by community mental health centers (CMHCs).
( d ) The following medical and other health services furnished by a home health agency (HHA) to patients who are not under an HHA plan or treatment or by a hospice program furnishing services to patients outside the hospice benefit: ( 1 ) Antigens.
( 2 ) Splints and casts.
( 3 ) Hepatitis B vaccine.
( e ) ( 1 ) Effective January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008, an initial preventive physical examination, as defined in § 410.16 of this chapter, if the examination is performed no later than 6 months after the individual's initial Part B coverage date that begins on or after January 1, 2005.
( 2 ) Effective January 1, 2009, an initial preventive physical examination, as defined in § 410.16 of this chapter, if the examination is performed no later than 12 months after the date of the individual's initial enrollment in Part B.
[65 FR 18542, Apr. 7, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 66813, Nov. 1, 2002; 69 FR 65863, Nov. 15, 2004; 71 FR 68227, Nov. 24, 2006: 75 FR 72265, Nov. 24, 2010; 88 FR 82180, Nov. 22, 2023]
#### Charles Jess PALMER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-350.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 17, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### § 585.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures, and other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Presidential Associates I
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


Date: May 13, 2005                                   /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael L. Ashner
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 13, 2005                                   /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas Staples
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                     - 16 -
#### Delroy Keith YOUNG, a/k/a “Buddy”, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1398.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 1979.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Fundak v. State,*362 So.2d 295 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Dennis JARROW v. Judge Rudolph BECKER, III & Frank Blackburn, Warden et al.

No. 80-K-1445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Dennis Jarrow, applying for remedial writ. Parish of Orleans. No. 246-288.

Denied.
#### *L &*A CONTRACTING COMPANY et al. v. E. J. PIZZETTA MECHANICAL CORP., INC.

No. 47762.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 28, 1974.

Zachary, Weldy & Ingram, Jolly W. Matthews, III, Hattiesburg, for appellants.

Oscar B. Ladner, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Forrest County; Stanton A. Hall, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J. and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### EAGLE PENCIL, a Division of Berol Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Mahlon C. JACOBSON and Emily R. Jacobson, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 137.167 What cost principles must a Self-Governance Tribe follow when participating in self-governance under Title V? A Self-Governance Tribe must apply the cost principles of the applicable OMB circular, except as modified by: ( a ) Section 106 (k) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j-1],
( b ) Other provisions of law, or
( c ) Any exemptions to applicable OMB circulars subsequently granted by the OMB.
# C_2006048EN.01002902.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — Arysta Lifescience v OHIM

(Case T-169/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE - Former national word mark CARPO - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 48/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Arysta Lifescience SAS, formally Calliope SAS (Noguères, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BASF AG (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Action

brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2004 (Case R 289/2003-1) relating to the opposition proceedings between Calliope SAS and BASF AG

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Designating Entities Linked to Russia’s Malign Activities in Africa

# 											Designating Entities Linked to Russia’s Malign Activities in Africa									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 8, 2024

The United States is today designating one Russia-based entity and one Central African Republic-based entity for their efforts in advancing malign activities of the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group in Africa.

The targets being designated have played an important role in supporting the Russian Federation by seeking monetary gain from illicit resource extraction and providing logistical support to elements of the Wagner Group’s commercial endeavors.

Today’s action reflects the United States’ commitment to disrupting the Wagner Group’s damaging and destabilizing presence in Africa. We will continue to use the tools at our disposal to disrupt Putin’s ability to arm and equip his war machine.

The Department of the Treasury actions were taken pursuant to Executive Order 14024, as amended.  For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCentral African RepublicOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctions

Back to Top
# GRAYIROBINSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW

W. Campbell McLean 813-273-5108 CATYIPBELL.MCLEAN@GRAY-ROBINSON.COM

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW February 13,2013

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430

Dear Clerk: 

### Re: In the Matter ofBraille Battery, Inc. FAA 

### CaseNo. 2011 

### SO 700298 

### Docket No. FAA-2012-0781 SUITE 2700 401 E. jACKSON STREET (33602) P.O. Box 3324 FORT LAUDERDALE TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-3324- jACKSONVILLE TEL 813-273-5000 fAX 813-273-5145 KEY WEST LAKELAND MELBOURNE MIAMI NAPLES ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE TAMPA

Enclosedherewith please find the original and one copy ofGrayRobinson'sNotice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Braille Battery, Inc. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely,

# ?-<~~~~'l~ W. Campbell McLean

WCM/lmw Enclosures
cc: Gerald 

### A. Ellis, Esq. (w/ encl.)

# 3743623 vl

www.gray-robinson.com 

# RECEIVED FEB 202013 

# HEARING DOCKETUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.


### FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Complainant, Docket No. FAA-2012-0781
vs. Case No. 2011 SO 700298 BRAILLE BATTERY, INC., Judge J. E. Sullivan Respondent.
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL FORBRAILLE BATTERY, INC.



### W. Campbell McLean, IV, Esq. and the finn of GrayRobinson, P.A. hereby withdraw their appearance as counsel ofrecord for Respondent, Braille Battery, Inc., in the above-styled
cause ofaction. All future communications should be directed to: Blake Fuller, CEO Braille Battery, Inc. 6935 15 1 h 

### Street E, Building 115 Sarasota, FL 34243 blake@braillebattery.com Telephone: (941) 312-5047

# ~-~~~/ W.**CAM~LL** 

### McLEAN, ESQUIRE Florida BarNo. 0141402 campbell.mclean@gray-robinson.com GrayRobinson, P.A. 401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 2700 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 273-5000 Facsimile: (813) 273-5145 Attorneys for Respondent 

# RC"r=tVED FEB 2020t3**H~Ani•'~~G** 

## DOCKETCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished f/. via facsimile transmission and U.S. Mail to the following this onthis 

### _11,_ day ofFebruary, 2013: Gerald A. Ellis, Esq. Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 Fax: (404) 305-5223

cc: Braille Battery, Inc. (via e-mail)

2 Han. J. E. Sullivan, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536

# 3743484 vl
#### DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Bertha FLORIAN et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County.

Appeal dismissed.
# a Da 7-S2- l

... tiCwP7f[-_' :b .jF0-R - FILING ATTN: Secretary of State

Administrative Procedure Officer State House Station 329 Augusta, Maine 043 33 1 . AGENCY: Department of Environmental Protection 2 . AGENCY UMBRELLA ANDUNIT # : 06-096 

# (C

3 . TITLE OF RULE : Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products 4 . CHAPTER NUMBER ASSIGNED TOTHE RULE(S) : Chapter 152 5. DATE(S)/METHOD(S) OF NOTICE : On July 2, 2007 in the Kennebec Journal and on July 11, 2007 in the Kennebec Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor Daily News, Lewiston Sun-J ournal, and_Waterville Morning_Sentinel . 6. DATE(S)/PLACE(S) OF HEARINGS(S) : August 2, 2007 9:00 A .M . Holiday Inn Augusta, Maine. 7. TYPE OF RULE : New Rule X Amendment of Existing Rule Emergency Rule Repeal Existing rule Suspension of Existing Rule 8 . NAME/PHONE OF CONTACT PERSON : Andrea Lani 207-287-2437. 9 . CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: I, David P. Littell, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of the rule described above and lawfully adopted by the Board of SIGNATUR PRINTED NAME &

TITLE : David P

. Littell, Commissioner 10 . APPROVED as to formand legality by the Attorney General on SIGNATURE : PRINTED NAME : ~ ' :~4 D . ~0"j r 

# ;

.AT ; : . DEC 15 2007 EFFECTIVE n
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,576,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,713,693
<PP&E>                                         452,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,205,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,021,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,070
<OTHER-SE>                                     945,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,205,465
<SALES>                                        111,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,196
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,128,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (58,999)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,005,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,005,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,005,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
# C_2006074EN.01001102.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/11

---

Action brought on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-68/06)

(2006/C 74/21)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Minas Konstantinidis, of its Legal Service, and Florence Simonetti, a national expert, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive into domestic law expired on 21 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30.

1

---
§ 406.52 Conviction of certain offenses. ( a ) *Penalty that affects entitlement.* ( 1 ) If an individual is convicted of any of the crimes listed in § 406.11(c) (1) and (2), the court may impose, in addition to all other penalties, a penalty that affects entitlement to hospital insurance, beginning with the month of conviction.
( 2 ) The additional penalty is that the individual's income (or the income of the insured individual on whose earnings record he or she became or seeks to become entitled) for the year of conviction and any previous year may not be counted in determining the insured status necessary for entitlement to hospital insurance.
( b ) *Effect of pardon.* If the President of the United States pardons the convicted individual, that individual regains (or may again seek) entitlement effective with the month following the month in which the pardon is granted.
[48 FR 12536, Mar. 25, 1983. Redesignated at 51 FR 41338, Nov. 14, 1986. Further redesignated at 57 FR 58717, Dec. 11, 1992]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on April 29, 2009 (74 FR 19595), Almac Clinical Services, Inc., (ASCI), 2661 Audubon Road, Audubon, Pennsylvania 19403, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleOxycodone (9143)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to import small quantities of the listed controlled substances in dosage form to conduct clinical trials. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Almac Clinical Services Inc. to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Almac Clinical Services Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: August 21, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-21538 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### § 137.326 What must a Tribal proposal for a construction project agreement contain?

A construction project proposal must contain all of the required elements of a construction project agreement as defined in § 137.280. In addition to these minimum requirements, Self-Governance Tribes may propose additional items.