alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeGuinea

# Guinea

66 items

        -    		United States Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability: Country and Region Plans	  March 22, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Conakry, Guinea: The American International School of Conakry: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 20, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 20, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcement on ADAPT initiative in Guinea	  Matthew MillerNovember 8, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Conakry, Guinea: The American International School of Conakry: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 3, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Guinea National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 2, 2023 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Guinea September 19, 2023	   
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Guinea	  August 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Guinea 	  June 27, 2023 

123…7next page

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 7, 2012

p0904

Order 

September 7, 2012

145678

SC: 145678

In re K.K. ALEXANDER, Minor. COA: 306959

Oakland CC Family Division:

10-775263-NA

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Community Center

Wiseman 

istorical Museum

pa k ng

Arctic Getaway ed & Breakfast

oreal Lodging

alhabuk 

rayer Chapel

eako! 

home

Wiseman Trading Company

Ha ry Leonard's Cabin

Old 

ost 

O"ce

Middle Fork Koyukuk River

NOT TO SCALE

public outhouse

caribou

hor n

ate windmill

windmill

ingle Cabin

To A p

moose 

hor n

pole

Wiseman Cre k

To Da on H ghway 3 m e

To Wiseman

Cemetery

M dd e Fo k Koyukuk R ve

Coldfoot 

Airstrip

Alaska 

State

Trooper

Coyote

Air

Old Coldfoot

Alaska Department

of Transportation

no public services)

NPS Ranger Station (summer only)

Coldfoot Camp

Post Office

Slate Creek Inn

S C ek

T ans A aska P pe ne

Da ton H ghway

Coldfoot

Cemetery

Arctic Interagency Visitor Center

(summer only)

Marion Cre k Campground 5 miles 14

Coldfoot

Wiseman
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-15780) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1986
Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-82214) pertaining
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1986 Stock Option Plan and the 1994
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-100931) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of our report dated March 5, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Omega Financial Corporation incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2004
IB

Union Calendar No. 288

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3068

[Report No. 104–584]

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke

their charter of incorporation issued under the Indian Reorganization Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 1996

Mr. GUTKNECHT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

MAY 20, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke their charter of incorporation issued under

the Indian Reorganization Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3068 RH

1 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORA2 TION OF THE PRAIRIE ISLAND INDIAN COM3 MUNITY UNDER THE INDIAN REORGANIZA4 TION ACT.

5 The request of the Prairie Island Indian Community

6 to surrender the charter of incorporation issued to that

7 Community on July 23, 1937, pursuant to section 17 of

8 the Act of June 18, 1934, commonly known as the ‘‘Indian

9 Reorganization Act’’ (25 U.S.C. 477) is hereby accepted

10 and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.

Union Calendar No. 288

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3068

[Report No. 104–584]

A BILL

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian

tion issued under the Indian Reorganization Act.Community to revoke their charter of incorporaMAY 20, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
§ 124.604 Posted notice. ( a ) The facility shall post notices, which the Secretary supplies in English and Spanish, in appropriate areas of the facility, including but not limited to the admissions area, the business office and the emergency room.
( b ) If in the service area of the facility the “usual language of households” of ten percent or more of the population, according to the most recent figures published by the Bureau of the Census, is other than English or Spanish, the facility shall translate the notice into that language and post the translated notice on signs substantially similar in size and legibility to, and posted with, those supplied under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The facility shall make reasonable efforts to communicate the contents of the posted notice to persons who it has reason to believe cannot read the notice.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1977

DESPINA NEUPH LUCAS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HOUR

- MAN, INC.; ALLIANT TECHNICAL; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.; STATE OF ILINOIS; JOHN JOSEPH MILAM; JOE PORTO , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 00409

- AWA

- LRL )

Submitted : October 20, 2021 Decided: November 18, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Despina Neuph Lucas , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Despina Neuph Lucas appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint without prejudice for improper venue

. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Regardless of whether the district court properly dismiss ed the c omplaint for improper venue sua sponte , we may affirm on any ground supported by the record

. See
Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. o f Governors , 824 F.3d 62, 75 n.13 (4th Cir. 2016). Our review
reveals that the district court lack ed subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint because there was not complete diversity of citizenship of the parties and , therefore, that the complaint was subject to dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3)

. Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp. , 546 U.S. 500, 506 , 514 (2006) ( explaining that , under Rule 12(h)(3) , the court must dismiss
an action when it concludes it lacks subject matter jurisdiction); see Navy Fed. Credit Union v. LTD Fin. Servs., LP , 972 F.3d 344, 356, 361 n.14 (4th Cir. 2020) (concluding that, under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1), corporations are dual citizens of their state of incorporation and the state in which they have their principal place of business). Moreover, any applicable statute of limitations expired long before this action was filed. Accordi ngly,
we affirm

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* We conclude that the district court’s order dismissing the complaint without prejudice is an appealable final order

. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 611

- 12 (4th Cir. 2020) , cert. denied , 141 S . Ct. 1376 (2021).
#### Cornelia RAPPOPORT, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL and Risk Corporation of Florida, Appellees.

No. ZZ-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 8, 1981.

Robert H. Gregory, Miami, for appellant.

David R. Howland of Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg & Howland, P. A., North Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant (claimant) was an LPN at the employer hospital. The claimant experienced some pain which she attributes to her lifting heavy patients. After hearing the claimant’s testimony and considering somewhat contradictory histories given by the claimant to her physicians the Deputy Commissioner found no compensable accident.

Ordinarily such a finding, if supported by the record evidence, will not be upset on appeal. However in this case there was a 284 day interval between hearing and entry of an order. In a case like this, where the chief issue is the credibility of the claimant, we feel that the delay was excessive. We therefore reverse the order below and remand for a *de novo*hearing.

In doing so we are aware of the cases in which our Supreme Court has held the 30 *1245day period of Florida Statutes § 440.25(3)(b) to be directory only. In *Scottie-Craft Boat Corp. v. Smith,*336 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1976), and in *Miller v. Oolite Industries, Inc.,*336 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1976), the Supreme Court held that delays of 250 days and 18 months respectively did not require reversal. As noted in a special concurrence by Justice England to *Scottie-Craft,*joined by two of the four majority votes, those decisions left the IRC discretion to find some orders “stale.” If the Commission found that the fact findings were dependent upon hearing-level advantages, then it could remand for a new hearing in the interests of justice.

Here we have the same situation. The credibility of a witness is largely dependent upon her demeanor. It would be difficult for anyone to recall live testimony after seven months and in all probability the decision below was based upon the transcript. In our opinion the interests of justice require a new hearing. Accordingly, the order is vacated and the cause is remanded.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
#### George B. OVERLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. KK-489/T1-6.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 9, 1980.

*1202George B. Overly, in pro per.

Gordon G. Oldham, Jr., State’s Atty., Leesburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s appeal of the denial by the trial court of his 3.850 motion to vacate • is affirmed because the motion is legally insufficient on its face. *Potts v. State,*242 So.2d 729 (Fla.2d DCA 1971); *Johnson*v. *State,*181 So.2d 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

CROSS, ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                      1,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,326
<PP&E>                                           5,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           265
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,317
<SALES>                                          3,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,886
<CGS>                                            2,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,240)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.241 Pharmacy arrangements.

Effective January 1, 2011, an ESRD facility that enters into an arrangement with a pharmacy to furnish renal dialysis service drugs and biologicals must ensure that the pharmacy has the capability to provide all classes of renal dialysis service drugs and biologicals to patients in a timely manner.

[75 FR 49202, Aug. 12, 2010]
#### ASC MEAT IMPORTS, LTD., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BOARD OF REVIEW and Lynn A. Caldwell, Respondents.

No. 78-1221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 31, 1979.

Andrew P. Mavrides of Mavrides, Latimer, Shamres, Konigsburg & Platt, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the State of Florida, Department of Commerce, Board of Review, entered May 8, 1978. This Court concludes that no error has been demonstrated in the order by the Board of Review and the same is therefore affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
HomeJapan

# Japan

587 items

        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Trip to Japan and Mongolia	  March 19, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		On the 2nd U.S.- Japan Strategic Dialogue on Democratic Resilience	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Canada	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Endorsing Principles for 6G: Secure, Open, and Resilient by Design	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement from the 14th U.S.-Japan Dialogue on Digital Economy	  February 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Japan	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Kamikawa and Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho	  February 22, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Japanese Foreign Minister Kamikawa Yoko and Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul  Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 22, 2024JW Marriott HotelRio de Janeiro, Brazil 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano	  February 16, 2024 

previous page1234…59next page

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01001801.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/18

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2005

in Case T-265/03 Helm Düngemittel GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Food aid - Partial seizure of delivery guarantee - Request for repayment of the sum seized - Arbitration clause - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 229/37)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-265/03: Helm Düngemittel GmbH, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by W. Waschmann, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Berscheid and M. Niejahr, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action seeking annulment of the decision allegedly contained in a letter from the Commission of 23 May 2003 concerning the seizure of part of the delivery guarantee provided by the applicant on grounds of delay in the delivery of fertilizer supplied as part of a food aid action for the benefit of North Korea carried out pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2519/97 of 16 December 1997 laying down general rules for the mobilisation of products to be supplied under Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 as Community food aid (OJ 1997 L 346, p. 23) — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J. Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 4.10.2003.

1

---
#### § 137.200 Are there reporting requirements for Self-Governance Tribes under Title V?

Yes, compacts or funding agreements negotiated between the Secretary and a Self-Governance Tribe must include a provision that requires the Self-Governance Tribe to report on health status and services delivery. These reports may only impose minimal burdens on the Self-Governance Tribes.
No. 99-488.

#### Rodriguez *v.*Muhlenberg Hospital Center.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 590.315 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
### Periodic heat flow in a stratified medium with application to permafrost problems

By: A. H. Lachenbruch

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1083A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Experimental and theoretical geophysics                                                                    
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Dissipation of the temperature effect of drilling a well in Arctic Alaska(1958)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 8.71 Effect of disbarment or suspension. ( a ) *Disbarment.* If the final order against the respondent is for disbarment, the respondent will not thereafter be permitted to practice before the Bureau unless authorized to do so by the Director of Practice pursuant to § 8.72.
( b ) *Suspension.* If the final order against the respondent is for suspension, the respondent will not thereafter be permitted to practice before the Bureau during the period of suspension.
( c ) *Surrender of enrollment card.* If an enrolled practitioner is disbarred or suspended, he or she shall surrender the enrollment card to the Director of Practice for cancellation, in the case of disbarment, or for retention during the period of suspension.
( d ) *Notice of disbarment or suspension.* Upon the issuance of a final order for suspension or disbarment, the Director of Practice shall give notice of the order to appropriate officers and employees of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and to interested departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The Director of Practice may also give notice as he or she may determine to the proper authorities of the State in which the disbarred or suspended person was licensed to practice as an attorney or certified public accountant.