alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.140 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: *ADA* stands for the American Diabetes Association.
*Approved entity* means an individual, physician, or entity accredited by an approved organization as meeting one of the sets of quality standards described in § 410.144 and approved by CMS under § 410.141(e) to furnish training.
*Deemed entity* means an individual, physician, or entity accredited by an approved organization, but that has not yet been approved by CMS under § 410.145(b) to furnish training.
*Diabetes* means diabetes mellitus, a condition of abnormal glucose metabolism.
*NSDSMEP* stands for the National Standards for Diabetes Self Management Education Programs.
*Organization* means a national accreditation organization.
*Rural* means an area that meets one of the following conditions: ( 1 ) Is not urbanized (as defined by the Bureau of the Census) and that is designated by the chief executive officer of the State, and certified by the Secretary, as an area with a shortage of personal health services.
( 2 ) Is designated by the Secretary either as an area with a shortage of personal health services or as a health professional shortage area.
( 3 ) Is designated by the Indian Health Service as a health service delivery area as defined in § 36.15 of this title.
*Training* means outpatient diabetes self-management training.
[65 FR 83148, Dec. 29, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 63261, Nov. 7, 2003; 76 FR 73471, Nov. 28, 2011, 88 FR 79529, Nov. 16, 2023]
EXHIBIT 11

                     PARLEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Computation of Net Income Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended
                                     Sept. 26, 1999     Sept. 27, 1998
                                     --------------     --------------

<S>                                    <C>                <C>
Net Income Per Share - Basic           $      .28         $      .04

Weighted Average Number
 of Shares Outstanding                  4,794,858          4,640,795

Net Income Per Share - Diluted         $      .28         $      .04

Weighted Average Number of
 Shares Outstanding                     4,794,858          4,640,795

Effect of Dilutive Stock Options           48,330            148,098

Adjusted Weighted Average
 Number of Shares Outstanding           4,843,188          4,788,893
</TABLE>
40578.

#### RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DAVIS et al.

Decided October 28, 1964.

*Woodruff, Saveli, Lane & Williams, Edward L. Saveli,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ay cock, Ivey & Slotin, Phillip Slo tin,*contra.

Eelton, Chief Judge.

The Supreme Court on certiorari has reversed the judgment of this court on the main bill of exceptions in *Davis v. Reserve Ins. Co.,*220 Ga. 335 (138 SE2d 657). The judgment of reversal rendered by this court on the main bill is vacated and the judgment of the trial court excepted to in the main bill of exceptions is

*Affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Rusnak, state and attest that:



|(1) | I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge,
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the periodic report) containing financial
statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant for the periods presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                               
|----- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Patrick J. Rusnak                                         
|Title |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | August 12, 2010
# C_2005244EN.01000401.xml

| 4.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/4

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2005/C 244/04)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the EUR 2 denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Finland

Subject of commemoration: 60th anniversary of the United Nations and 50th anniversary of Finland's membership of the UN

Factual description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts a dove of peace formed of pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Underneath the dove, along the edge of the lower half of the inner circle, the words Finland — UN appear on the left and the year of mintage on the right. Above the figure, close to the jigsaw puzzle, there is a letter ‘K’, the engraver's initial. The MINT mark ‘M’ appears underneath the representation of the dove of peace. The twelve stars of the European Union are depicted on the outer ring.

Issue volume: 2 million coins

Approximate issue period: October 2005

Edge lettering: YK 1945 — 2005 FN *** (the * stands for a lion's head)

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, pp. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

2

---
# C_2006025EN.01000802.xml

| 1.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4075 — Providence/Carlyle/Com Hem)

(2006/C 25/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4075. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4075. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary McKeon Visits the University of the District of Columbia

# 									Deputy Secretary McKeon Visits the University of the District of Columbia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 16, 2022

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian P. McKeon will visit the University of the District of Columbia (UDC) on November 16, 2022, as part of continuing efforts to engage with students on U.S foreign policy priorities and attract candidates who reflect a demographic cross-section of American society to careers in the State Department.  He will meet with the university’s leadership and with students participating in the UDC-DACOR (Diplomatic and Consular Officers Retired) mentorship program.

For further information about career and internship opportunities at the State Department, contact your regional Diplomat in Residence, which you can find at the State Department’s Careers website. Media inquiries may be submitted to the Office of Press Relations.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesDistrict of ColumbiaOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelYouth Programs

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.13 Drugs and biologicals. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare pays for drugs and biologicals as inpatient hospital or inpatient CAH services only if— ( 1 ) They represent a cost to the hospital or CAH;
( 2 ) They are ordinarily furnished by the hospital or CAH for the care and treatment of inpatients; and
( 3 ) They are furnished to an inpatient for use in the hospital or CAH.
( b ) *Exception.* Medicare pays for a limited supply of drugs for use outside the hospital or CAH if it is medically necessary to facilitate the beneficiary's departure from the hospital and required until he or she can obtain a continuing supply.
[48 FR 12541, Mar. 25, 1983, as amended at 58 FR 30666, May 26, 1993]
#### Tibbens v. Sheriff of Dauphin County et al.

*Raymond Tibbens,*p. p., for petitioner.

December 15, 1954.

Neely, J.,

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Relator is now imprisoned in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Ga. He names the Sheriff of Dauphin County as respondent in his petition, and prays for the issuance of a writ in the following language:

> “Petitioner, Raymond Tibbens, moves and prays this Honorable Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus forthwith and command said petitioner to be brought forthwith, and to appear by prosecution as provided by law, or so failing to act and to show cause, issue forthwith an order over the Seal of this Honorable Court, declaring your petitioner shall be held for naught.”

*643We can take note of our own records, and they show that petitioner stands indicted here for two separate offenses — at O. & T., January sessions, 1952, no. 2, on a charge of burglary; and at January sessions, 1952, no. 31, on a charge of larceny of an automobile.

Petitioner claims that he has constitutional objections to enter to any trial on these charges, and because of these objections he maintains that he must be discharged in these cases. He apparently seeks to have us determine, on this petition, the validity of his constitutional objections and to have us order that he be brought here to press those objections.

The jurisdiction of this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus is statutory. The Habeas Corpus Act of February 18, 1785, 2 Sm. L. 275, 12 PS §1871, et seq., gives this court authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus where a person is being detained within the jurisdiction of the court. And section 1 of the Act of May 25, 1951, P. L. 415, 12 PS §1901, likewise provides that any judge of a court of common pleas shall have jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus where a person is detained in “any penitentiary, prison, reformatory, house of detention, mental institution, or other place”, within the judge’s judicial district. The Act of 1951 also confers authority upon a judge of this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus where a person has been sentenced by this court to any penal institution in this Commonwealth and is being detained therein, outside of this judicial district.

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in this case, where relator is being detained in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Ga. If the relator has any objections to offer at his trial on the larceny and burglary charges, he may present the same at the trial or otherwise take appropriate proceedings to accomplish his discharge in those cases.

*644We will not, of course, pass upon the constitutional questions in a proceeding in habeas corpus which we have no power to entertain.

And now, December 15, 1954, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is herewith dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

    (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.


Date: November 16, 2004


/s/ Robert W. McMartin
-------------------------
Robert W. McMartin
Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
MO, 0(p-l5-600H3-CV FILED IW The Court ofAppeals Sixth District 

### rtFotiVEDiN XN THE n ^sAW"1" COURT of APPEALS utilises U-c 092015 S\XTH A?PELATE DV6TWCT o F Texarkana,Texas TEXAS. TEXARKANA, TEXAS DebraK.Autrey,Clerk Te::-:rkana, Texas i

- Debrs Anfw Higrk

. IN THE XNTEfcEST OF OTNU.P. AND M,b.A.P,CV\\LDREt4 M\CvUEL Don Po&oe, APPELLANT CKSSANDRA. BWEfcSCftC ANt) THE OFFICE oFTtXE ATTORN Q€NeR/\U APPELLEES

FR6M APPEAL Nb. OG>-lS"-OOo43-dV TRIAL C.OORT NO, PZ0030^<4G-2- UTV\ t)\STR\CT COURT TOHM^OM CouNTV, T9XA<>

hAtm&N TO FXTEND T^FAE To ~F\L^ NOTiOH FoR REBEAR\HGc COMCSNOW, M\CU/VEL OoM PO&U6, AppelWoV,under 

### TE*. K. APP. P. H^,<g arvi to.S*0>\ aste, -Ae floor* +o ftknd 4irA€ 4o -ftW. <x Mo-WfN R>o ReWrw^. X<n SurpporvY o£ -V-WI5



## mo^oA +^e AppeUaM" sWi 4V. Cow*: 4-Vyl -ftjlW^S,
I 

### TY>e. de<\dW -&c -ftUY^ <x NUAvon For S^e^r^

- PNiE I

-IS due. T\\vr$A<k\) , Dec. \o, zovs".

rp: Appe\\<xn+ requests cka e^-Ven-sv'bn ©£ 30 d^5 4o 

### -Pile ex TAoAioA Poo feetacunA^, majesty *+V\e doe date fer -ftUhj Sa\<J cr>e>-KbA TAfcluA&y <*, 'Zfc|5%
in: Appelant |5 KowkJ ih 4V\e TUunSte/ Unrt o-f T0C3" i^ 

### PolK County,Texas, Appellant te l»Wit«J +00, One 2 Woor S^si'oa <xAo^j , s* days a tueefc v^ tW ftJoosfy Lcxu) Lil&oc^-
3K Appellant Ka^ ancMver cAeadLUVve or\ Dec. \<\Zo\s- \n 

### 4a€ TersVV\ Court a* Appeals, UJgxjd,Te*c*s -+0 -Gl< «. fet\&n
/Appellant requests 4V\n*6 €rtttr»su>A doe Ho +Wt l\W^«A access +d lauj boo^s ar»d re6eaocK crvxterWl 4© adequacy cevUu) 4-W cases aiW \n +\\e $\*U\ Court o£ Appeals OpvoA^n, 

### +6 prepare sUe^eo^ -&r*VHe Mvtio* for feWc^ ,and Vhe cWdluve A-to, Appellant W> va 4W T«a-U\ Court o* Appeals

### WUSRefbeF, App^AWt pc^/s 4-Wii Court uu»l\ <£t>a*t+Vtf fAerVio* T£> £*Wl T^tm> To Fr\e ^ Mo*Uo<\ *br K^VWio^ +<> Tm4

-Pa^e 7r Re^pecUoUy, N^cha^l Po§ue, poo 3e 

### T<>Xas Oepwttvwt- C>CCrvivurwaJ Tu^tvc^- Lwi%tf+on,Ty 7735"!CERTIFICATE OF SERxJ\CC 

### X, rAicttAfuPos^e, AppelWt, do hen^ Cert^sj 4Wt<x troe cxr\d C6rrec+ cofv^ o£- tVve alocfv/e a,nd 4or«goi<\a Motion "TO Extend Time -Vo t\k rAotioA for ReKearinc*, nc^- beerv -6>rujaodjed bv/ U,5. 

### Wai^pos-fa^e paid,4WtCks$/t& Attorney o-P Kea>rd/MicVd A,Mon^-z. \Moo ti»ll<Lrest Or. ArU^DA/TX TUOIO, atvA 4o Cassanc^ BouJecse^ (X^ 2c>z R«s-v ~rK*M St. CWJborne,TX 76D3l,andl+o Raodc K, bterndl ^^d 

### OeterreaA 5, GxwwUe ot -VVe Attorney fcevetttUr 6#ic* at &0- BOX I"2OH fAC OSfl-l, Au6"twvTX 7*711-2017, «.md +° Toaa B. Wocley, 

### A55i5-Ua+ AUorney (Wnd, P.O.-BOX \ZOfl (Y\C03S"I,Av6\r\<\t7t "7*711 oa thJi +Y\e 2nd d^ o-? bee, 2o»5~.

Appellant, pro^e 

### X, MkWJ Po^, TbtT*fc 1932517/bem^ vAaxraef^-t^d in 

## •+Ve Polo^ky OnH: o£ +W. THX/b JtepartmeftVot Crwwwtl "3\Mice,

in ft>lk &u«xty,TejlAS,\fcnf\J Good dkdace under +l\epet\e|ty„ of pocAor^ 4Wxt +V\e ~6>cej3f>i'<v\ statements oice -troe. aMCorrect, Executed on 4-Ws +h«: 2nd cUy <?£ Oeo 20IS"

-P<^e3- 

### M\ckic/ Pogue Tt>tT4t l<??2^7
## ***Exhibit 10.27***

 

**DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE**

 
| **$25,000** | **October 16, 2003** |
|-------------|---------------------------|

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PURCHASESOFT, INC, aDelaware corporation (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of **Steven A.Flagg**, an individual resident of the State of California (“Lender”),at such place as the holder hereof may designate, in lawful money of the UnitedStates of America, the principal sum of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000),plus interest as hereinafter provided, on demand. This Note shall be due andpayable 180 days from the date hereof.  This Note shall bear interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof atthe rate of 6% per annum; provided that interest shall accrue at the rate of 8%per annum on any principal or accrued interest that is not paid within fivedays of written demand, from the date of such demand until the date of payment.

 

Borrowerwaives presentment, demand, protest, notice of protest, notice of dishonor,notice of nonpayment, any and all other notices and demands in connection withthe delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of thisNote.  No delay by the holder hereof inexercising any power or right in respect of this Note shall operate as a waiverof such or any other power or right.

 

Borrower may at any time prepay in whole orin part, from time to time, the outstanding principal amount of this Note,together with accrued interest to date of payment on the principal amount soprepaid.

 

Borrower shall pay the holder hereof allcosts and expenses of collection of this Note, including without limitationreasonable attorneys’ fees.

 

This Note shall be deemed to be made underand shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the Stateof California.

 

 
|   | PURCHASESOFT, INC. |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |
|   |               |
|   | By                 | /s/ Thomas B. Marsh |   |
|   |               | Thomas B. Marsh |
|   |               | Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
#### § 137.148 Does appealing the decision of the Secretary prevent entering into the compact, funding agreement, or amendment?

No, appealing the decision of the Secretary does not prevent entering into the compact, funding agreement, or amendment.