alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006060EN.01000802.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-504/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin in Agrarproduktion Stabelow GmbH v Landrat des Landkreises Bad Doberan (1)

1

(Animal health - Prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Slaughter of birth cohorts - Proportionality)

(2006/C 60/16)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-504/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany), made by decision of 9 January 2004, received at the Court on 8 December 2004, in the proceedings Agrarproduktion Stabelow GmbH v Landrat des Landkreises Bad Doberan — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of M.A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, A. La Pergola, A. Borg Barthet and A.Ó Caoimh, Judges; M.Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M.B. Fülöp, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it ruled as follows:

Examination of the question referred has not revealed anything capable of affecting, in the light of the principle of proportionality, the validity of Article 13(1), first sentence, (c), of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1326/2001 of 29 June 2001 laying down transitional measures to permit the changeover to Regulation No 999/2001 and amending Annexes VII and XI to that regulation, in conjunction with Annex VII(2)(a) and the third indent of Annex VII(1)(a) to that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

1

---
#### Michael Eugene ALFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1981.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles D. Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Trela J. White, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to vacate the provision in the judgment which requires the payment of monies pursuant to Sections 943.24 and 960.20, Fla.Stat. (1979). *See State v. Byrd,*378 So.2d 1231 (Fla.1979); *Cox v. State,*334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert R. Jones, III, President and CEO, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|      |                |     |                         
|----- | -------------- | --- | ------------------------
|Date: | March 27, 2007 | By: | /s/ Robert R. Jones, III
|      |                |     | Robert R. Jones, III    
|      |                |     | President and CEO       
|      |                |     |
#### § 137.445 Will an immediate reassumption appeal adversely affect the Self-Governance Tribe's rights in other self-governance negotiations?

No, a pending appeal will not adversely affect or prevent the negotiation or award of another compact, funding agreement, or construction project agreement.
HomeVenezuela

# Venezuela

160 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk	  April 17, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Conference with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  April 14, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Humanitarian and Development Assistance for Venezuela Regional Crisis	  March 23, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Venezuela	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Additional Assistance to Respond to the Venezuela Regional Crisis	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 17, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Venezuela	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 19, 2023	  Vedant PatelJanuary 19, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 3, 2023	  Ned PriceJanuary 3, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Venezuela’s Interim Government and the 2015 National Assembly	  Ned PriceJanuary 3, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 8, 2022	  Ned PriceNovember 8, 2022Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…34567…16next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 170 (Thursday, September 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21259]



[[Page 45672]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the General Counsel


Appointment of Members of the Legal Division to the Performance 
Review Board, Internal Revenue Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal 
Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the 
Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the 
Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service 
Panel:
    1. Chairperson, Christopher Sterner, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel 
(Operations);
    2. Roland Barral, Area Counsel (Large and Mid-Size Business);
    3. Sara M. Coe, Deputy Division Counsel (Small Business/Self 
Employed);
    4. Alan Tawshunsky, Deputy Division Counsel/Deputy Associate Chief 
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities);
    5. Deborah A. Butler, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration).
    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: August 20, 2009.
William J. Wilkins,
Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. E9-21259 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Christopher Alvin LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 29, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Chief, Appellate Division, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, SHARP, and COWART, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24 b

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the
further incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Registration No. 33-28249), Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-54852), Form S-8
(Registation No. 33-57494), and Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-01989) of
Financial Trust Corp of our report dated March 1, 1996 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Financial Trust Corp for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1994.




                                                       Ernst & Young LLP


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 4, 1997
699 A.2d 730

#### Donald HUNT, Petitioner, v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY and Safety Hoist Company and Safety Hoist Co., Inc.and DRG, Inc., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 16, 1997.

Reargument Denied Nov. 6, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 1997, it is ordered that Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED; the order of the Superior Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County transferring venue from Philadelphia County to Bucks County is REVERSED; and this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in *Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, Inc.,*No. 56 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996, and *Forman v. Rossman,*et al., No. 57 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996,-Pa.-, 701 A.2d 156 (1997).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Czech Republic National Day

# 									Czech Republic National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 28, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I offer my sincere congratulations to the people and government of the Czech Republic as you celebrate the 105th anniversary of the founding of a free and democratic Czechoslovakia.

Our nations share a deep friendship and an abiding commitment to democracy and the rule of law. We stand united in our support for Ukraine in the face of Russia’s war of aggression. The Czech Republic has demonstrated that commitment through close military cooperation, humanitarian assistance, support for refugees and its efforts to ensure the transit of Ukrainian grain to feed a hungry world. The United States is grateful for your courage and leadership.

The values we share have led to collaboration and progress on other critical international issues. Together, we are creating clean energy solutions to address the climate crisis, deepening international cooperation in space through the Artemis Accords, and investing in the security of NATO’s Eastern Flank.

I wish you a wonderful National Day. I look forward to strengthening our bonds of friendship and alliance to the benefit of our peoples and the region.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCzech RepublicDemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Thomas Sidney MORRISON, Appellants, v. John Patrick GILMORE et al., Appellees.

No. 47783.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 9, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         286,199
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    20,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               698,472
<PP&E>                                         67,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,286,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,779,919
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72,506
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,286,815
<SALES>                                        884,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               884,844
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,119,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,270,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,270,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.26)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      21,449,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,247,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   234,559
<INVENTORY>                                  5,516,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,368,359
<PP&E>                                      28,694,352
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,656,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,069,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,685,143
<BONDS>                                      3,038,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,464
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,317,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,069,769
<SALES>                                     61,199,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            61,199,104
<CGS>                                       35,473,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,619,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               182,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,245,380
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,376,637)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,757,203
<DISCONTINUED>                             (5,730,197)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (972,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006048EN.01000602.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Joined Cases C-232/04 and C-233/04, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Düsseldorf Nurten Güney-Görres, Gul Demir v Securicor Aviation (Germany) Ltd, Kötter Aviation Security GmbH & Co. KG (1)

1

(Directive 2001/23/CE - Article 1 - Transfer of undertaking or business - Safeguarding of employees' rights - Scope)

(2006/C 48/12)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases C-232/04 and C-233/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Arbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany), made by decision of 5 May 2004, received at the Court on 3 June 2004, in the proceedings between Nurten Güney-Görres (C-232/04), Gul Demir (C-233/04) and Securicor Aviation (Germany) Ltd, Kötter Aviation Security GmbH & Co. KG — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr, A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur) and U. Lõhmus, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 December 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 1 of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, must be interpreted as meaning that in examining whether there is a transfer of an undertaking or business within the meaning of that article, in the context of a fresh award of a contract and having regard to all the facts, the transfer of the assets for independent commercial use is not an essential criterion for a finding that there was a transfer of those assets from the original contractor to the new contractor.

---

(1)  OJ C 228 of 11.09.2004.

1

OJ C 201 of 07.08.2004.

---
# Nicaragua

139 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 22, 2021	  Ned PriceJune 22, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with President Carter	  June 17, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Welcomes the Organization of American States Resolution on Nicaragua	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Argentina Foreign Minister Solá	  June 11, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcing Sanctions on the Ortega Regime in Response to Arbitrary Detentions and Other Undemocratic Moves	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 9, 2021	  Ned PriceJune 9, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Acting Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs Julie Chung and Special Envoy for the Northern Triangle Ricardo Zuniga	  Julie J. ChungJune 4, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The Ortega Regime Should Immediately Release Opposition Leader Cristiana Chamorro  	  Ned PriceJune 4, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 2, 2021	  Jalina PorterJune 2, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Foreign Ministers from the Hemisphere	  June 2, 2021 

previous page1…89101112…14next page

Back to Top
§ 35.4 Noncompliance; discharge or transfer. ( a ) If the officer in charge finds, upon investigation, that a patient other than a leprosy patient, by willful and persistent failure or refusal to comply with such rules, instructions, or regulations is seriously impeding the course of his own care and treatment, or that of other patients, he may ( 1 ) discharge the patient, or
( 2 ) if the patient is not a voluntary patient, arrange for his transfer to the custody of the authority responsible for his admission to the station or hospital. No patient shall be discharged or transferred on account of noncompliance if to do so would seriously endanger his life or health, nor shall any patient be discharged if his failure to comply is due, in the opinion of the officer in charge, to a mental disease or disorder.
( b ) If the discharge or transfer of a patient is likely to endanger the health of persons other than the patient or officers or employees of the station or hospital, the officer in charge shall give advance notice to appropriate State, county, or municipal authorities of the discharge or transfer.
§ 405.2436 Termination of agreement. ( a ) *Termination by FQHC.* The FQHC may terminate its agreement by— ( 1 ) Filing with CMS a written notice stating its intention to terminate the agreement; and
( 2 ) Notifying CMS of the date on which the FQHC requests that the termination take effect.
( b ) *Effective date.* ( 1 ) Upon receiving a FQHC's notice of intention to terminate the agreement, CMS will set a date upon which the termination takes effect. This effective date may be— ( i ) The date proposed by the FQHC in its notice of intention to terminate, if that date is acceptable to CMS; or
( ii ) Except as specified in paragraph (2) of this section, a date set by CMS, which is no later than 6 months after the date CMS receives the FQHC's notice of intention to terminate.
( 2 ) The effective date of termination may be less than 6 months following CMS's receipt of the FQHC's notice of intention to terminate if CMS determines that termination on such a date would not— ( i ) Unduly disrupt the furnishing of FQHC services to the community; or
( ii ) Otherwise interfere with the effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program.
( 3 ) The termination is effective at the end of the last day of business as a FQHC.
( c ) *Termination by CMS.* ( 1 ) CMS may terminate an agreement with a FQHC if it finds that the FQHC— ( i ) No longer meets the requirements specified in this subpart; or
( ii ) Is not in substantial compliance with— ( A ) The provisions of the agreement; or
( B ) The requirements of this subpart, any other applicable regulations of this part, or any applicable provisions of title XVIII of the Act.
( 2 ) *Notice by CMS.* CMS will notify the FQHC in writing of its intention to terminate an agreement at least 15 days before the effective date stated in the written notice.
( 3 ) *Appeal.* A FQHC may appeal CMS's decision to terminate the agreement in accordance with part 498 of this chapter.
( d ) *Effect of termination.* When a FQHC's agreement is terminated whether by the FQHC or CMS, payment will not be available for FQHC services furnished on or after the effective date of termination.
[57 FR 24978, June 12, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 25476, May 2, 2014]