alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAustria

# Austria

99 items

        -    DipNote  		The Innovation Station Travels to Austria, Hungary, and Slovenia	  March 28, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Austria	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Robinson Travels to Tbilisi, Rome, Vatican City, and Vienna	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Austria	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Austrian Foreign Minister Schallenberg	  February 7, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Austrian Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 7, 2023Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		20 Years after the Washington Agreement	  Stuart EizenstatNovember 14, 2022General Settlement Fund and Diplomatic Academy EventVienna, Austria 
        -    Media Note  		Foreign Service Institute Director Polaschik Travels to Thailand, India, and Austria	  November 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele Sison’s Travel to Geneva, Vienna, and Paris	  November 4, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Austrian Secretary General for Foreign Affairs Launsky-Tieffenthal	  November 1, 2022 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.34 May I purchase definitive Series I savings bonds over-the-counter?

Effective January 1, 2012, Treasury discontinued the over-the-counter sale of definitive Series I savings bonds.

[76 FR 66856, Oct. 28, 2011]
§ 415.184 Psychiatric services. ( a ) Physician fee schedule payment is made for psychiatric services furnished under an approved GME program if the requirements of §§ 415.170 and 415.172 are met, including documentation, except that the requirement for the presence of the teaching physician during the service in which a resident is involved may be met by observation of the service by use of a one-way mirror, video equipment, or similar device.
( b ) In residency training sites that are located outside of a metropolitan statistical area, the requirement for the presence of the teaching physician during the service in which a resident is involved may be met through audio/video real-time communications technology. The medical records must document the extent of the teaching physician's participation in the service.
( c ) For all teaching settings during the Public Health Emergency, as defined in § 400.200 of this chapter, for the COVID-19 pandemic, the requirement for the presence of the teaching physician during the service in which a resident is involved may also be met through audio/video real-time communications technology. The medical records must document the extent of the teaching physician's participation in the service.
[85 FR 85037, Dec. 28, 2020]
# CA2006018EN.01000101.xml

| 25.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 18/1

---

CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST IN MEMBERSHIP OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND SCIENTIFIC PANELS OF THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST IN MEMBERSHIP OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND SCIENTIFIC PANELS OF THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

(Deadline for expression of interest extended until 17 February 2006)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

As published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C  289 A of 22 November 2005, p. 6, the closing date for sending applications is 7 January 2006. However, due to apparently recurring problems with online applications, in particular during the final week of the application period, the deadline for expression of interest has been extended until Friday 17 February 2006.

Official Journal of the European Union

the deadline for expression of interest has been extended until Friday 17 February 2006

This call is addressed to scientists wishing to be considered for membership of the Scientific Committee or a scientific panel of the European Food Safety Authority, established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. The Authority has its permanent seat in Parma, Italy.

---
# C_2006010EN.01002401.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/24

---

Action brought on 10 October 2005 — Buendía Sierra v Commission

(Case T-380/05)

(2006/C 10/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Buendía Sierra (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude, V. Landes, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Director General of the Legal Service to award him only four Directorate-General priority points for the 2004 promotion exercise, which was confirmed and made definitive by the decision of the Appointing Authority rejecting his internal appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Director General of the Legal Service to award him only four Directorate-General priority points for the 2004 promotion exercise, which was confirmed and made definitive by the decision of the Appointing Authority rejecting his internal appeal;

| — | annul the Appointing Authority's decision not to award him any ‘Promotion Committee for additional activity in the interests of the institution’ special priority points for the 2004 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Appointing Authority's decision not to award him any ‘Promotion Committee for additional activity in the interests of the institution’ special priority points for the 2004 promotion exercise;

| — | annul the Appointing Authority's decision to award him a total of 20 points for the 2004 promotion exercise and a total of 40 points for the purpose of promotion to Grade A4 during that exercise; the merit list of Grade A5 officials for the 2004 promotion exercise, the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 in the 2004 promotion exercise and, in any event, the decision not to enter his name in those lists; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Appointing Authority's decision to award him a total of 20 points for the 2004 promotion exercise and a total of 40 points for the purpose of promotion to Grade A4 during that exercise; the merit list of Grade A5 officials for the 2004 promotion exercise, the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 in the 2004 promotion exercise and, in any event, the decision not to enter his name in those lists;

| — | annul, so far as may be necessary, the decision rejecting his complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, so far as may be necessary, the decision rejecting his complaint;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant advances pleas similar to those he advanced previously in Case T-311/04 (1), an action also brought by him.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004, p. 44

1

---
§ 599.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
# C_2005193EN.01001201.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the the Supreme Court, Ireland, by order of that court of 11 May 2005 in Sam McCauley Chemists (Blackpool) Ltd and Mark Sadja v Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, Minister for Health and Children, Ireland and the Attorney General

(Case C-221/05)

(2005/C 193/20)

Language of the case: English

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the the Supreme Court, Ireland, of 11 May 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 May 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Sam McCauley Chemists (Blackpool) Ltd and Mark Sadja and Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, Minister for Health and Children, Ireland and the Attorney General on the following question:

Does Article 2 of Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy (1)

1

| (a) | impose a single obligation limited to requiring a Member State to recognise the qualifications referred to in Article 2.1 of the Directive except with respect to the establishment of new pharmacies as defined in Article 2.2, or, |
| --- | --- |

(a)

impose a single obligation limited to requiring a Member State to recognise the qualifications referred to in Article 2.1 of the Directive except with respect to the establishment of new pharmacies as defined in Article 2.2, or,

| (b) | does it impose on a Member State a distinct obligation to recognise the qualifications referred to in Article 2.1 but, in addition, confer on Member States a discretion whether to extend such recognition to persons holding such qualifications with respect to the establishment of new pharmacies open to the public, as defined in Article 2.2? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

does it impose on a Member State a distinct obligation to recognise the qualifications referred to in Article 2.1 but, in addition, confer on Member States a discretion whether to extend such recognition to persons holding such qualifications with respect to the establishment of new pharmacies open to the public, as defined in Article 2.2?

---

(1)  OJ L 254, 24.09.1985, p. 37

1

---
#### James H. BRANNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. ZZ-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 11, 1982.

*1142Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Granting full review despite the untimely notice of appeal pursuant to *Hollingshead v. Wainwright,*194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1959), the decision of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Hegstrom,*401 So.2d 1343 (Fla.1981).

MILLS, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
HomeUkraine

# Ukraine

1660 items

        -    Notice to the Press  		U.S. Government Participation in the 2024 U.S.-Ukraine Partnership Forum	  April 12, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Spanish State Secretary for Foreign and Global Affairs Martínez Belío	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And U.S-EU Trade and Technology Council Ministerial Co-Chairs At Sixth U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024Faculty ClubLeuven, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba	  April 4, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2024NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a NATO 75th Anniversary Reception	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 3, 2024Ambassador’s Residence, Truman HallBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 3, 2024NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for “Restoring Justice for Ukraine” Conference	  Beth Van SchaackApril 2, 2024The Hague 

123…166next page

Back to Top
#### ON TOP OF THE WORLD, INC., et al., Appellants, v. The ELMER J. KRAUSS ORGANIZATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 74-1416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 15, 1975.

Fred L. Bryson and Richard H. Mal-chon, Jr., of Earle, Earle & Bryson, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Howard P. Ross, of Parker, Battaglia, Ross, Parker & Stolba, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and' after hearing oral argument in this cause, the points raised on appeal gave us considerable pause. After further review of the record, however, we are persuaded there has been no reversible error demonstrated by the appellant. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 3/22/2012 Sample Number: 121218-001 Date Collected:03/14/2012 08:20 Date Received:3/14/2012 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.5 0.5 CHL EPA 1631E 0.2 03/16/2012 

### Sample Number: 121218-002 Date Collected:03/14/2012 08:20 Date Received:3/14/2012 

## Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.5 0.5 CHL EPA 1631E 0.2 03/16/2012 

### Sample Number: 121218-003 Date Collected:03/14/2012 08:25 Date Received:3/14/2012 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 77.2 10 CHL EPA 1631E 5 03/16/2012 

### Sample Number: 121218-004 Date Collected:03/14/2012 08:30 Date Received:3/14/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 11.0 5 CHL EPA 1631E 2 03/16/2012 

### Sample Number: 121218-005 Date Collected:03/14/2012 08:20 Date Received:3/14/2012 

### Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.6 0.5 CHL EPA 1631E 0.2 03/16/2012

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121218 Page 1 of 1
# C_2006011EN.01000801.xml

| 17.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4038 — PAI/SSK (Specialty Chemicals))

(2006/C 11/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4038. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4038. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Pauline T. SONGY v. Huey P. LaPLACE et al.

No. 67756.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Huey P. LaPlace et al., applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ. Parish of Orleans. No. 11597.

Writ denied.
#### Gillett *v.*Ball.

Possession of a note by an agent for collection is the possession of his principal to entitle him to maintain trespass for forcibly taking it from the agent.

Where a note was obtained by duress, the drawer is not precluded from setting that up as a defence, because he retains an indemnity from a liability for which the note was given.

In error from the Common Pleas of Bradford.

*July*

The plaintiff’s evidence showed that his agent had called on the defendant to demand payment of a note, whereupon the defendant seized the paper, and refused to deliver it up. The form of the action did not appear: the plea was, not guilty. The defendant proved the note was given under duress, in settlement of a claim for getting plaintiff’s daughter with child. It also appeared that the defendant held an indemnity from the plaintiff against the liability for the support of the child.

The court was of opinion that the possession of the agent would support an action by the principal, and that the defendant retaining the indemnity, was estopped from setting up as a defence, the duress in obtaining the note.

*Mereer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Willistonf*contó.

*14Pur Curiam.

The note, being in the hands of an agent for collection, when it was forcibly seized by the defendant, was virtually in the possession of the plaintiff, to found an action of trespass on it. But whatever the form of the remedy, it is enough that the cause was tried without a declaration in the Common Pleas; and as on the face of the justice’s transcript, it is not said whether the action was trespass or case, we are at liberty to treat it as the one or the other, according to the circumstances disclosed by the evidence.

The remaining assignments of errors are the same in substance. It is a part of the case, that the note had been extorted by unlawful arrest and detention of the person, as compensation for getting the plaintiff’s daughter with child; and the court charged that the duress would not avail the defendant while he retained in his possession a written contract of indemnity against liability to support the child. Suppose the action were founded on the note, not on the spoliation of it; and the one case would be just as strong as the other — would the defendant be precluded from showing the duress because he held a guaranty, which would fall dead with the note of which it was the consideration ? Nothing is more true than that he could not enforce the one, and resist the other; and the want of delivering up the guaranty before it was exploded by a verdict against the plaintiff for the note, ought not to have estopped the defendant from showing the truth.

Judgment reversed, and a *venire de novo*awarded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         527,216
<SECURITIES>                                   434,036
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,715
<INVENTORY>                                     94,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,086,716
<PP&E>                                       1,471,294
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,058,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,499,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          353,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,768
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,145,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,499,524
<SALES>                                        648,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               669,203
<CGS>                                          454,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  896,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (226,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (226,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (226,819)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)


</TABLE>
# C_2006022EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 17 November 2005

in Case C-90/03: Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Fisheries - Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 - Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector - Detailed rules and arrangements - Substantial procedural defect - Infringement of Article 254 EC)

(2006/C 22/01)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-90/03 Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad), supported by Hellenic Republic (Agents: V. Kontolaimos and G. Kanellopoulos) and French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and A. Colomb) v Council of the European Union (Agents: J. Monteiro and F. Florindo Gijón), supported by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. van Rijn and S. Pardo Quintillán) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 28 February 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), A. Borg Barthet and U. Lõhmus, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 November 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic, the Hellenic Republic and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic, the Hellenic Republic and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 7.6.2003.

1

---