alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.146 Diabetes outcome measurements. ( a ) *Information collection.* An approved entity must collect and record in an organized systematic manner the following patient assessment information at least on a quarterly basis for a beneficiary who receives training under § 410.141: ( 1 ) Medical information that includes the following: ( i ) Duration of the diabetic condition.
( ii ) Use of insulin or oral agents.
( iii ) Height and weight by date.
( iv ) Results and date of last lipid test.
( v ) Results and date of last HbA1C.
( vi ) Information on self-monitoring (frequency and results).
( vii ) Blood pressure with the corresponding dates.
( viii ) Date of the last eye exam.
( 2 ) Other information that includes the following: ( i ) Educational goals.
( ii ) Assessment of educational needs.
( iii ) Training goals.
( iv ) Plan for a follow-up assessment of achievement of training goals between 6 months and 1 year after the beneficiary completes the training.
( v ) Documentation of the training goals assessment.
( b ) *Follow-up assessment information.* An approved entity may obtain information from the beneficiary's survey, primary care physician contact, and follow-up visits.
#### § 599.312 OFAC.

The term *OFAC* means the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
§ 31.2 Persons entitled to treatment. To the extent and under the circumstances prescribed in §§ 31.2 to 31.10, the following persons shall be entitled to medical, surgical, and dental treatment and hospitalization by the Service: ( a ) *Coast Guard.* ( 1 ) Commissioned officers, chief warrant officers, warrant officers, cadets, and enlisted personnel of the Regular Coast Guard, including those on shore duty and those on detached duty, whether on active duty or retired;
( 2 ) Regular members of the Coast Guard Reserve when on active duty or when retired for disability;
( 3 ) Temporary members of the Coast Guard Reserve when on active duty or in case of physical injury incurred or sickness or disease contracted while performing active Coast Guard duty;
( 4 ) Members of the Women's Reserve of the Coast Guard when on active duty or when retired for disability;
( 5 ) Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary in case of physical injury incurred or sickness or disease contracted while performing active Coast Guard duty.
( b ) *National Ocean Survey.* Commissioned officers, ships' officers, and members of the crews of vessels of the National Ocean Survey, including those on shore duty and those on detached duty whether on active duty or retired.
( c ) *Public Health Service.* ( 1 ) Commissioned officers of the Regular Corps of the Service, whether on active duty or retired;
( 2 ) Commissioned officers of the Reserve Corps of the Service when on active duty or when retired for disability.
(Sec. 326, 58 Stat. 697, as amended 42 U.S.C. 253)
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.173 Payment for intensive outpatient services in CMHCs: Conditions. Medicare Part B pays for intensive outpatient services furnished in a CMHC on behalf of an individual only if the following conditions are met: ( a ) The CMHC files a written request for payment on the CMS form 1450 and in the manner prescribed by CMS; and
( b ) The services are furnished in accordance with the requirements described in § 410.111.
[88 FR 82179, Nov. 22, 2023]
#### Donald William DORAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 29, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
# Niger

134 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Officials Travel to Niger	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Niamey, Niger: American International School of Niamey: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Niamey, Niger: American International School of Niamey: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  January 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Niger National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 18, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 4, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 4, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Niger	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Winners of the 2023 Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence	  October 19, 2023 

123…14next page

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY THEODORE FONVILLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-7-F, CA-95-96-7-F)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Theodore Fonville, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Boyce,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Fonville, Nos. CR-92-7-F; CA-95-96-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Xinjiang

23 items

        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    Statement of Concern  		Statement on China	  July 18, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 Report on International Religious Freedom: China: Xinjiang	  May 23, 2019 

previous page123

Back to Top
EXHIBIT NO. 11

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                          |  |                              |  |                   
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2006
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 14,303,517                   |  | .87               
|Diluted                                   |  | 14,303,517                   |  | .87               
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 14,303,517                   |  | .87               
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  | 14,303,517                   |  | .87               
|                                          | 
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2005
|                                          |  | Shares                       |  | Earnings Per Share
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 14,303,368                   |  | .72               
|Diluted                                   |  | 14,303,368                   |  | .72               
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 14,303,368                   |  | .72               
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  | 14,303,368                   |  | .72
# C_2005281EN.01001402.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/14

---

Action brought on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-360/05)

(2005/C 281/28)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Gross and M. Velardo, acting as Agents.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt and communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/96/EEC (1) of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, the Italian State has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt and communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/96/EEC (1) of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, the Italian State has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 of that directive;

1

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 28(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC, which concerns restructuring of the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, provides:

‘Member States shall adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 31 December 2003. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.’

The Italian State does not appear to have adopted the implementing measures provided for by Article 28(1), and, in any event, has not informed the Commission thereof or provided any evidence which permits the inference that the necessary measures have been adopted. Under those circumstances, the Italian State is to be regarded as having failed to fulfil its obligations under that provision.

---

(1)  OJ L 283 of 31.10. 2003, p. 51.

1

---
§ 408.88 Refund of group payments. ( a ) *Basis for refund.* Group payments are refunded only in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The premium was for a month after the month in which the enrollee's SMI coverage terminated or the enrollee died.
( 2 ) The premium was for a month after the month in which the group payer gave notice (before the 26th day of that month) that the enrollee was no longer eligible for group payment and was being dropped from the group.
( b ) *Example.* F is the wife of J who is a retiree of Corporation X. That corporation pays premiums on behalf of all of its retirees and their dependents. F obtains a divorce from J on October 20 and thus disqualifies herself for further premium payments by the corporation. The corporation gives notice on November 10 that a refund is due because F has been dropped from the list of persons for whom it has agreed to pay premiums. The premium paid for December would be refunded to the group payer.
( c ) *To whom refund is made.* ( 1 ) CMS ordinarily refunds to the group payer the premiums specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) However, if CMS has information that clearly shows those premiums were paid from the enrollee's funds, it sends the refund to the enrollee.
§ 405.1108 Council actions when request for review or escalation is filed. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, when a party requests that the Council review an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision, the Council will review the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision *de novo.* The party requesting review does not have a right to a hearing before the Council. The Council will consider all of the evidence in the administrative record. Upon completion of its review, the Council may adopt, modify, or reverse the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision or remand the case to an ALJ or attorney adjudicator for further proceedings.
( b ) When a party requests that the Council review an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's dismissal of a request for a hearing, the Council may deny review or vacate the dismissal and remand the case to the ALJ or attorney adjudicator for further proceedings.
( c ) The Council will dismiss a request for review when the party requesting review does not have a right to a review by the Council, or will dismiss the request for a hearing for any reason that the ALJ or attorney adjudicator could have dismissed the request for hearing.
( d ) When an appellant requests escalation of a case from the OMHA level to the Council, the Council may take any of the following actions: ( 1 ) Issue a decision based on the record constructed at the QIC and any additional evidence, including oral testimony, entered in the record by the ALJ or attorney adjudicator before the case was escalated.
( 2 ) Conduct any additional proceedings, including a hearing, that the Council determines are necessary to issue a decision.
( 3 ) Remand the case to OMHA for further proceedings, including a hearing.
( 4 ) Dismiss the request for Council review because the appellant does not have the right to escalate the appeal.
( 5 ) Dismiss the request for a hearing for any reason that the ALJ or attorney adjudicator could have dismissed the request.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5122, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### § 91.6 Nuisances.

The use of loud, abusive, or profane language, unwarranted loitering, unauthorized assembly, the creation of any hazard to persons or things, improper disposal of rubbish, spitting, prurient prying, the commission of any obscene or indecent act, or any other disorderly conduct on the property is prohibited. The throwing of any articles of any kind in, upon, or from the property and climbing upon any part thereof, is prohibited. The entry, without specific permission, upon any part of the property to which the public does not customarily have access, is prohibited.
§ 137.419 What authority does the IBIA have under §§ 137.415 through 137.436? The IBIA has the authority: ( a ) to conduct a hearing on the record;
( b ) to permit the parties to engage in full discovery relevant to any issue raised in the matter;
( c ) to issue a recommended decision; *and*
( d ) to take such action as necessary to insure rights specified in § 137.430.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Entities and Individuals that Offer Financial Services to Sanctioned Russian Entities

# 											Designating Entities and Individuals that Offer Financial Services to Sanctioned Russian Entities									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 25, 2024

The United States is today designating two individuals and 18 entities for operating in the financial services and technology sectors of the Russian Federation economy.  Many of today’s targets offer services to previously designated entities, including Russian financial institutions, or misuse virtual assets to enable sanctions evasion.

Today’s action reaffirms the G7 commitment to curtail Russia’s use of the international financial system to further its war against Ukraine.  It also reflects our continued efforts to target companies servicing Russia’s core financial infrastructure.  We will continue to take all appropriate action to promote accountability for those who enable or profit from Russia’s illegal war.

*The Department of Treasury is taking these actions pursuant to Executive Order 14024, as amended.  For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctions

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department Renews Charter of Overseas Schools Advisory Council

# 									Department Renews Charter of Overseas Schools Advisory Council							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 17, 2021

On March 26, 2021, the Department of State renewed the charter of the Overseas Schools Advisory Council (OSAC) to provide a formal channel for consultation and advice from U.S. corporations and foundations regarding American-sponsored overseas schools. The Under Secretary for Management has determined that renewal of the advisory committee charter is necessary and in the public interest.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration will appoint the members of the committee. The committee will follow the procedures prescribed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will be open to the public unless a determination is made in accordance with the FACA Section 10(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) that a meeting or a portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of each meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the meeting date.

For further information, contact Mr. Thomas Shearer, Executive Secretary of the Committee at (202) 261-8200 or OverseasSchools@state.gov.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsOffice of the SpokespersonOverseas SchoolsUnder Secretary for Management

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Roosevelt McCORMICK v. ST. CHARLES PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

No. 66775.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Roosevelt McCormick, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of St. Charles. No. 78-264.

Writ denied. Appeal pending.
# C_2005193EN.01002702.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/27

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2005

in Case T-80/04 Jean-Pierre Castets v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Invalidity - Compensation for leave not taken - Number of days taken into account for the purpose of calculating compensation - Reasons not attributable to the requirements of the service)

(2005/C 193/45)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-80/04: Jean-Pierre Castets, a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Saint-Victor-des-Oules (France), represented by G. Crétin, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decision of the Commission fixing the amount of compensation for annual leave not taken by the applicant at the time of leaving the service, insofar as the compensation calculation is a result of the fact that the amount of leave which may be carried over is limited to twelve days per calendar year — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
#### Marilyn Olson GODFREY, etc., Appellant, v. William Colin TRENARY, III, Appellee.

No. 74-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 137.270 What is covered by this subpart?

This subpart covers IHS construction projects carried out under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8].
§ 137.302 Are Federal funds available to cover start-up costs associated with initial Tribal assumption of environmental responsibilities? ( a ) Yes, start-up costs are available as provided in section 508(c) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-7(c)]. During the initial year that these responsibilities are assumed, the amount required to be paid under section 106(a)(2) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j-1(a)(2)] must include startup costs consisting of the reasonable costs that have been incurred or will be incurred on a one-time basis pursuant to the agreement necessary: ( 1 ) To plan, prepare for, and assume operation of the environmental responsibilities; and
( 2 ) To ensure compliance with the terms of the agreement and prudent management.
( b ) Costs incurred before the initial year that the agreement is in effect may not be included in the amount required to be paid under section 106(a)(2) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j-1(a)(2)] if the Secretary does not receive a written notification of the nature and extent of the costs prior to the date on which such costs are incurred.
EXHIBIT 32

                              MAMMATECH CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mammatech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Henry S. Pennypacker, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director and Mary
Bailey Sellers, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /s/ Henry S. Pennypacker                            Dated: February 13, 2009
        --------------------
    Henry S. Pennypacker
    Title: Chief Executive Officer

    /s/ Mary Bailey Sellers
        -------------------
    Mary Bailey Sellers
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.102 General payment rules. ( a ) *General rule.* For PEN items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2002, and for splints and casts and IOLs inserted in a physician's office on or after April 1, 2014, Medicare pays for the items and services as described in paragraph (b) of this section on the basis of 80 percent of the lesser of—- ( 1 ) The actual charge for the item or service; or
( 2 ) The fee schedule amount for the item or service, as determined in accordance with §§ 414.104 thru 414.108.
( b ) *Payment classification.* ( 1 ) CMS or the carrier determines fee schedules for parenteral and enteral nutrition (PEN) nutrients, equipment, and supplies, splints and casts, and IOLs inserted in a physician's office, as specified in §§ 414.104 thru 414.108.
( 2 ) CMS designates the specific items and services in each category through program instructions.
( c ) *Updating the fee schedule amounts.* For the years 2003 through 2010 for PEN items and services, the fee schedule amounts of the preceding year are updated by the percentage increase in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending with June of the preceding year. For each year subsequent to 2010 for PEN items and services and for each year subsequent to 2014 for splints and casts, and IOLs inserted in a physician's office, the fee schedule amounts of the preceding year are updated by the percentage increase in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending with June of the preceding year, reduced by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II) of the Act.
[66 FR 45176, Aug. 28, 2001, as amended at 78 FR 72252, Dec. 2, 2013]