alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALL STREET DELI, INC., FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 3, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                       1,305,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,648,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                   661,371
<INVENTORY>                                    564,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,572,551
<PP&E>                                      28,348,579
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,132,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,173,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,272,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,740
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,730,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,173,458
<SALES>                                     58,258,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,258,464
<CGS>                                       52,394,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,394,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               661,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,226,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   106,366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,333,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,333,142)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.79)


</TABLE>
HomeMoldova

# Moldova

111 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Moldovan President Maia Sandu After Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 17, 2023Hotel Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 16, 2023	  Vedant PatelFebruary 16, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 14, 2023	  Ned PriceFebruary 14, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 10, 2023	  Vedant PatelFebruary 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Moldova and France	  February 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 15, 2022	  Vedant PatelNovember 15, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing October 26, 2022	  Vedant PatelOctober 26, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Response to Corruption and Election Interference in Moldova	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 26, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Moldova’s Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 27, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara’s Travel to Romania and Moldova	  August 8, 2022 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
AFS-13-446-E

August 26, 2013

 Exemption No. 10384A 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1127

Mr. Charles E. Horning

Department Chairman, Aviation Maintenance Science

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

600 South Clyde Morris Blvd.

Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Dear Mr. Horning:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10384. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 2, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), for an extension to Exemption No. 

10384. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows ERAU to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students 

immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum, prior to meeting the 

experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the condition and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the extension of Exemption No. 10384, 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.
2

Conditions and Limitations 

Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, ERAU must provide its 

operations handbook to its certificate holding district office (CHDO) and receive 

approval of the operations handbook from the CHDO.

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10384, to November 30, 2016, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit31.1

CERTIFICATIONOFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, HenryFahman, Principal Executive Officer,PHI Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I havereviewedthis report on Form 10-K of PHI Group, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge,this report does not contain any untruestatementof amaterialfact or omit to state amaterialfactnecessaryto make thestatementsmade, in light of thecircumstancesunder which suchstatementswere made, notmisleadingwith respect to the periodcoveredby this report;

3. Based on myknowledge,thefinancial statements,and otherfinancial information includedin this report, fairly present in allmaterial respectsthefinancial condition,results ofoperationsand cash flows of theregistrantas of, and for, the periodspresentedin this report;

4. The smallbusinessissuer's othercertifying officersand I areresponsibleforestablishingandmaintaining disclosure controlsandprocedures(as defined inExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the smallbusinessissuer and have:

a)designedsuchdisclosure controlsandprocedures,or caused suchdisclosure controlsandproceduresto bedesignedunder oursupervision,to ensure thatmaterial information relatingto the smallbusinessissuer,includingitsconsolidatedsubsidiaries,is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)evaluatedtheeffectivenessof the smallbusinessissuer'sdisclosure controlsandproceduresandpresentedin this report ourconclusionsabout theeffectivenessof thedisclosure controlsandprocedures,as of the end of the periodcoveredby this report based on suchevaluation;and

c)disclosedin this report any change in the smallbusinessissuer'sinternalcontrol overfinancial reportingthatoccurredduring the smallbusinessissuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusinessissuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected,or isreasonablylikely tomateriallyaffect, the smallbusinessissuer'sinternalcontrol overfinancial reporting;and

5. The smallbusinessissuer's othercertifying officersand I havedisclosed,based on our most recentevaluationofinternalcontrol overfinancial reporting,to the smallbusinessissuer'sauditorsand the auditcommitteeof smallbusinessissuer's board ofdirectors(orpersons performingtheequivalent functions):

a) allsignificant deficienciesandmaterial weaknessesin the design oroperationofinternalcontrol overfinancial reportingwhich arereasonablylikely toadverselyaffect the smallbusinessissuer's ability to record,process, summarizeand reportfinancial information;and

|b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



internalcontrol overfinancial reporting.PHIGROUP,INC./s/ HenryFahmanHenryFahman, Principal ExecutiveOfficerDated:October13, 2009



---
# C_2006036EN.01003102.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 November 2004 — Tramarin v Commission

(Case T-426/04) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Admissibility - State aid - Commission request to amend a notified aid scheme - Actionable measure - Measure having legal effect - Time-limit - Point from which time starts to run - Summary publication in the Official Journal - Internet site)

(2006/C 36/67)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tramarin Snc di Tramarin Andrea e Sergio (Montagnana, Italy) (represented by: M. Calabrese, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent)

Defendant:

Application for

Annulment, first, of a Commission letter requesting the Italian authorities to amend an aid project notified and, second, of the decision of the Commission of 12 July 2000 declaring compatible with the common market an aid scheme for investment in depressed regions of Italy (State aid N 715/99 — (SG 2000 D/105754)

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay its own costs in addition to those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay its own costs in addition to those of the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
#### James Andrew TIMES, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-992.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 21, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3075 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3075

 Authorizing participation by the United States in the North American 
             Free Trade Agreement Coordinating Secretariat.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 1996

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Authorizing participation by the United States in the North American 
             Free Trade Agreement Coordinating Secretariat.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTICIPATION IN NAFTA COORDINATING SECRETARIAT.

    The United States is authorized to participate in the North 
American Free Trade Agreement Coordinating Secretariat in accordance 
with the North American Free Trade Agreement Coordinating Secretariat.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          24,027
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              13
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 1,064
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     58,272
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         107,152
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           108,198
<LOANS>                                        379,214
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 595,031
<DEPOSITS>                                     519,132
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,497
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 595,031
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,619
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,285
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   143
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,047
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,740
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 473
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,834
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (119)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,102
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,554
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,853
<LOANS-PAST>                                       438
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   333
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,043
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,831
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,647
<RECOVERIES>                                       722
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,787
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,787
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,225
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

[LETTERHEAD]


January 8, 1997


Magnus Lundberg
Gullvivivevagen #5
75655 Uppsala, Sweden

Dear Magnus:

The following is what is hopefully the final list of provisions related to
your employment in Emeryville that were not included in or have been revised
since your offer letter.

You will be provided a relocation allowance of $30,000.  This is based on an
estimate of the cost to move your household goods from Sweden to Emeryville
and back.  The money may be used for the shipment of household goods you wish
to bring with you and the purchase of supplemental household items here.  Our
records show that the expenses to date against this amount are $24,639.00.

The Company will provide you a leased automobile and will reimburse you for
the following expenses associated with its use; insurance, maintenance parts,
repairs and gas for business and personal use.

The Company will provide you with financial assistance in the renting of a
home through a monthly rental payment of $3,100.00.

Sincerely,


/s/ Barbara Kerr

Barbara Kerr
Vice President Human Resources



AGREED & ACCEPTED:


/s/ Magnus Lundberg
------------------------
Magnus Lundberg
#### Marva M. GOFF v. JENNY & SHORTY’S TRUCK STOP, INC., and the Travelers Insurance Co.

No. 6380.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1974.

Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, Frederick R. Tulley, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants.

Before SAMUEL, LEMMON and MARCEL, JJ.

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation settlement and compromise presented on the joint petition of the employee, the employer, and the latter’s compensation insurer under the provisions of R.S. 23:1271 et seq. As the employee was not represented by counsel, the trial court appointed an attorney to advise her. In due course the compromise was approved and judgment rendered accordingly. The judgment also fixed the fee of the appointed attorney at $50 and taxed the same as costs.

The employer and its insurer have appealed only from that portion of the judgment which fixes the fee of the appointed attorney and taxes the same as costs. They contend the $50 fee is in excess of the maximum amount allowed by statute.

Revised Statute 23:1272 is determinative of the issue. In pertinent part that statute reads:

> “When the employee or his dependents are not represented by a lawyer . the judge shall appoint one to advise them relative to the proposed compromise settlement. A reasonable fee for such services shall be fixed by the court and *when taxed as costs, it shall not exceed the sum of thirty-five dollars.”*LSA-R.S. 23:1272. (Emphasis ours).

As the statute is clear and free from all ambiguity, the courts must follow its explicit provision that when the fee of the court appointed attorney is taxed as costs the amount of that fee shall not exceed the sum of $35.1 As shown by the jurisprudence,2 the trial court was without authority to tax as costs a fee in excess of $35 and we must reduce the fee to that amount.

*380For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is amended only to the extent of reducing the fee of the court appointed attorney from $50 to $35; costs of this appeal to be paid by the appellants.

Amended.

1

. LSA-C.C. Art. 13.

2

. In Re Vicknair, La.App., 293 So.2d 196; Esteve v. McDermott Shipyards, La.App., 258 So.2d 645; Mills v. McDermott Fabricators, Inc., La.App., 247 So.2d 202; In Re Skiruin, La.App., 211 So.2d 119; In Re Batiste, La.App., 182 So.2d 559.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3822 — Stora Enso/Schneidersöhne Papier)

(2005/C 203/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Synthetic Fuel Production

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Sixth Congress, 1979-1981. 						*Synthetic Fuel Production : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Sixth Congress, First Session, June 20, 1979*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										June 20, 1979,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/223,			accessed on September 1, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 171 (Friday, September 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-21340 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: May. 18, 2010



### Pollutant: PMlO Total 0-lOum STP(81102) DesignValue Year: 2009 StandardUnits: Micrograms/cubic 

### meter (25

### C)(001) REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS. NAAQS Standard:PMlO 24-hour 2006 Statistic:Annual Estimated Days 

### > Standard Level:150 StateName: 

### California I 2009 

## I 2008 

## I 2007 

## I 3

# - Year 

## I Exceedances #Complete 

## I Exceedances #Complete 

## I Exceedances #Complete IEstimated Validity POC STREET ADDRESS Site ID 

# - IEstimatedCount Quarter Cert.pstimated CountQuarterCert.

## IEstimatedCountQuarter Cert.IExceedances Ind. 06-025-0005 1 1029 ETHEL ST, CALEXICO HIGH 18.3 3 4 0 0 4 6.1 14 8.1 Y SCHOOL 06-025-0007 1 220 MAIN ST., STE 204, BRAWLEY 18.8 3 4 0 0 4 13 2 4 10.6 Y 06-025-1003 2 150 9TH ST., EL CENTRO 13.1 

### 2 4 0 0 4 7 14 6.7 Y 06-025-4003 1 202 W FIRST STREET, 6.1 14 0 0 4 14 2 4 6.7 Y WESTMORLAND 06-025-4004 1 7711ENGLISH ROAD, NILAND 6.1 14 0 0 4 3.5 14 3.2 Y

Notes: 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (maynot be all data for year). 2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked wlth an asterisk (I*'). Page 

### 2 of 

### 2