alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 21, 2009, Chemic 
Laboratories, Inc., 480 Neponset Street, Building 7, Canton, 
Massachusetts 02021, made application by renewal to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of Cocaine 
(9041), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the above 
listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers for the 
purpose of research.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substance, may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than November 9, 2009.

    Dated: August 28, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21521 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mary C. VAN NESS, Appellee.

No. 74-1399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 578.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 578.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 578.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 578.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds blocked pursuant to § 578.201 may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
#### § 137.330 What happens if the Self-Governance Tribe and the Secretary cannot develop a mutually agreeable construction project agreement?

The Self-Governance Tribe may submit a final construction project proposal to the Secretary. No later than 30 days after the Secretary receives the final construction project proposal, or within a longer time agreed to by the Self-Governance Tribe in writing, the Secretary shall review and make a determination to approve or reject the construction project proposal in whole or in part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 410

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

#### § 410.130 Definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Chronic renal insufficiency* means the stage of renal disease associated with a reduction in renal function not severe enough to require dialysis or transplantation (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 15-59 ml/min/1.73m2).

*Diabetes* means diabetes mellitus, a condition of abnormal glucose metabolism .

*Episode of care* means services covered in a 12-month time period when coordinated with initial diabetes self-management training (DSMT) and one calendar year for each year thereafter, starting with the assessment and including all covered interventions based on referral(s) from a physician as specified in § 410.132(c). The time period covered for gestational diabetes extends only until the pregnancy ends.

*Medical nutrition therapy services* means nutritional diagnostic, therapeutic, and counseling services provided by a registered dietitian or nutrition professional for the purpose of managing diabetes or a renal disease.

*Physician* means a doctor of medicine or osteopathy legally authorized to practice medicine and surgery by the State in which he or she performs such function or action (including a physician within the meaning of section of 1101(a)(7) of the Act).

*Renal disease* means chronic renal insufficiency, end-stage renal disease when dialysis is not received, or the medical condition of a beneficiary for 36 months after kidney transplant.

[66 FR 55331, Nov. 1, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 63261, Nov. 7, 2003; 86 FR 65667, Nov. 19, 2021; 88 FR 79529, Nov. 16, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                                            
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                                                                        
|                       |  |     |  | Steven A. Abney                                                                                            
|                       |  |     |  | Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer
#### Oscar Miller, Appellant, *v.*Lazarus Stern, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant, on a verdict rendered by the jury.

D. O’Reilly (A. Pincus, of counsel), for appellant.

Wilmer & Canfield, for respondent.

Schuchman, J.

In this case we see no reason to doubt that the jury have not done substantial justice between the parties, and if the remark of the trial justice was prejudicial, it was cured by his charge, which left the matter in difference very fairly to the jury.

The evidence as to what the defendant paid in supplying the defect of the goods was not prejudicial, for the jury made no allowance therefor in their verdict.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OFTHE CFO PURSUANT TO 18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

**CERITFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PurchaseSoft, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Thomas B. Marsh, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, solely forthe purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       The report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of August 31, 2003 and for the periods then ended.

 
| /s/ Thomas B. Marsh                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                          |
| Thomas B. Marsh, Secretary, Treasurer and Acting  CFO  Dated October 14, 2003 |

 

----
# Poland

184 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry Announces Project Phoenix Participants and the Nuclear Expediting the Energy Transition (NEXT) Program	  September 7, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Polish Foreign Minister Rau	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Video Remarks  		Video Remarks at the Commemoration of the 80th Anniversary of the Bialystok Ghetto Uprising	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 16, 2023Bialystok, Poland 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Romania, the United Kingdom, and Poland	  August 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 9, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 9, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 2, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 24, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 24, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s call with Polish Foreign Minister Rau	  June 24, 2023 

previous page123456…19next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.303 Are Federal or other funds available for training associated with Tribal assumption of environmental responsibilities?

Yes, Self-Governance Tribes may use construction program and project funds for training and program development. Training and program development funds may also be available from other Federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Park Service, state and local governments, and private organizations.
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.130 Referral to Internal Revenue Service (IRS). ( a ) *CMS responsibility.* After CMS determines that a plan has been a nonconforming GHP in a particular year, it refers its determination to the IRS, but only after the parties have exhausted all CMS appeal rights with respect to the determination.
( b ) *IRS responsibility.* The IRS administers section 5000 of the IRC, which imposes a tax on employers (other than governmental entities) and employee organizations that contribute to a nonconforming GHP. The tax is equal to 25 percent of the employer's or employee organization's expenses, incurred during the calendar year in which the plan is a nonconforming GHP, for each GHP, both conforming and nonconforming, to which the employer or employee organization contributes.
§ 401.721 Terminating an agreement with a qualified entity. ( a ) *Grounds for terminating a qualified entity agreement.* CMS may terminate an agreement with a qualified entity if CMS determines the qualified entity or its contractor meets any of the following: ( 1 ) Engages in one or more serious violations of the requirements of this subpart.
( 2 ) Fails to completely and accurately report information to CMS or fails to make appropriate corrections in response to confidential reviews by providers and suppliers in a timely manner.
( 3 ) Fails to submit an approvable corrective action plan (CAP) as prescribed by CMS, fails to implement an approved CAP, or fails to demonstrate improved performance after the implementation of a CAP.
( 4 ) Improperly uses or discloses claims information received from CMS in violation of the requirements in this subpart.
( 5 ) Based on its re-application, no longer meets the requirements in this subpart.
( 6 ) Fails to maintain adequate data from other sources in accordance with § 401.711(c).
( 7 ) Fails to ensure authorized users comply with their QE DUAs or analysis use agreements.
( b ) *Return or destruction of CMS data upon voluntary or involuntary termination from the qualified entity program:* ( 1 ) If CMS terminates a qualified entity's agreement, the qualified entity and its contractors must immediately upon receipt of notification of the termination commence returning or destroying any and all CMS data (and any derivative files). In no instance can this process exceed 30 days.
( 2 ) If a qualified entity voluntarily terminates participation under this subpart, it and its contractors must return to CMS, or destroy, any and all CMS data in its possession within 30 days of notifying CMS of its intent to end its participation.
[76 FR 76567, Dec. 7, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 44482, July 7, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALL STREET DELI FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         490,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,225,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,578
<INVENTORY>                                    684,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,117,391
<PP&E>                                      34,163,503
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,035,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,065,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,129,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,689
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,765,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,065,627
<SALES>                                     65,453,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,453,642
<CGS>                                       58,157,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,157,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               169,578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             129,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Rwandan Foreign Minister Biruta

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Rwandan Foreign Minister Biruta							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 29, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Vincent Biruta yesterday in Washington, D.C.  They noted the strength of the bilateral partnership, which encompasses cooperation on public health, education, international governance, environment and climate, economic growth, and more.  They also discussed regional security issues of mutual interest. The Deputy Secretary also raised human rights concerns.  Deputy Secretary Sherman noted Rwanda’s support for the UNGA resolution condemning the Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine and the Ukraine-supported humanitarian resolution. She also expressed strong concern over the conviction of U.S. lawful permanent resident Paul Rusesabagina.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaRwandaOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsUkraine

Back to Top
# C_2005171EN.01003401.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/34

---

Action brought on 9 May 2005 by The Sherwin-Williams Company against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-190/05)

(2005/C 171/55)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 May 2005 by The Sherwin-Williams Company, represented by Enrique Armijo Chavarri and Antonio Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2003 (Case R 755/2004-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2003 (Case R 755/2004-2);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark TWIST & POUR — Application No 3.071.041, for goods in Class 21 (hand held plastic containers sold as an integral part of a liquid paint containing storage and pouring device) |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner contested before the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the application |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 |

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark TWIST & POUR — Application No 3.071.041, for goods in Class 21 (hand held plastic containers sold as an integral part of a liquid paint containing storage and pouring device)

Decision of the examiner contested before the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

---
#### Richard WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-1539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 3, 1979.

*612PER CURIAM.

Richard Williams appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion. We vacate the trial judge’s order disposing of the motion because the motion was not under oath. *Monroe v. State,*371 So.2d 683 (Pla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court with instructions to deny the motion without prejudice to the appellant to file a sworn motion.

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.
§ 415.110 Conditions for payment: Medically directed anesthesia services. ( a ) *General payment rule.* Medicare pays for the physician's medical direction of anesthesia services for one service or two through four concurrent anesthesia services furnished after December 31, 1998, only if each of the services meets the condition in § 415.102(a) and the following additional conditions: ( 1 ) For each patient, the physician— ( i ) Performs a pre-anesthetic examination and evaluation;
( ii ) Prescribes the anesthesia plan;
( iii ) Personally participates in the most demanding aspects of the anesthesia plan including, if applicable, induction and emergence;
( iv ) Ensures that any procedures in the anesthesia plan that he or she does not perform are performed by a qualified individual as defined in operating instructions;
( v ) Monitors the course of anesthesia administration at frequent intervals;
( vi ) Remains physically present and available for immediate diagnosis and treatment of emergencies; and
( vii ) Provides indicated post-anesthesia care.
( 2 ) The physician directs no more than four anesthesia services concurrently and does not perform any other services while he or she is directing the single or concurrent services so that one or more of the conditions in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not violated.
( 3 ) If the physician personally performs the anesthesia service, the payment rules in § 414.46(c) of this chapter apply (Physician personally performs the anesthesia procedure).
( b ) *Medical documentation.* The physician alone inclusively documents in the patient's medical record that the conditions set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section have been satisfied, specifically documenting that he or she performed the pre-anesthetic exam and evaluation, provided the indicated post-anesthesia care, and was present during the most demanding procedures, including induction and emergence where applicable.
[63 FR 58912, Nov. 2, 1998]
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Grant Rosson BROOKER, Petitioner, v. Honorable Robert W. TYSON, Jr., as Circuit Court Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-342.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of Prohibition denied.