alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 18, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00098
- CV RYAN GALLAGHER, Appellant

V. COLLIN COUNTY, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 416 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 00049
- 2020

ORDER Before the Court are appellant’s September 8, 2020 motion for summary judgment and September 13, 2020 further motion for summary judgment. We DENY the motions.

/s / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Lewis L. Jones, Plaintiff, *v.*Newberry H. Frost, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

July, 1898.)

Principal and agent — Procuring cause of a sale of stock — Commissions.

The mere fact that a broker brought certain stock, which was for sale, to the attention of one McCabe and that McCabe, of his own motion, brought the matter to the attention of one Dennison, who subsequently bought the stock of its owner, does not entitle the broker to recover commissions of the owner, as nothing which the broker did was the procuring cause of McCabe’s communication to Dennison, nor was that communication directly connected with any work done'in the agency. ,

Motion, to set aside a verdict.

Nichols *&*Bacon, for plaintiff.

Tracy, Boardman & Platt, for defendant.

Dugro, J.

The plaintiff brought certain stock to the attention of McCabe in an attempt to sell to him. McCabe mentioned the fact that the stock was for sale to Dennison, who thereafter bought it. The plaintiff- claims a commission from the seller. It does not appear that McCabe, in calling the attention of Dennison to the stock, acted as an agent of the plaintiff. McCabe’s act was, not the act of the plaintiff. It was his own act. Had he acted at the request of the plaintiff it would be otherwise. McCabe’s information may have caused Dennison’s action, but nothing that the plaintiff did was the procuring cause of McCabe’s communication; this communication was not directly connected with any work done in the agency and so the plaintiff cannot succeed. No agent is entitled to commission upon any transaction, unless he shows that *209the transaction is *a*direct, though not necessarily an immediate result of his agency. Bowstead on Law of Agency, 152. In Gibson v. Crick, 31 L. J. Exch. 304, it was held that though an agent may be entitled to be paid for work done by another person, it must be clear that person was acting as subagent, and the agent must have been the link between the principal and himself. This holding refers to the work of an agent’s agent. In Wilkinson v. Martin, 8 C. & P. 1; Wright on Principal *&*Agent, 160, it was decided that if an agent employed to get a loan introduces the matter to a person who refuses to entertain the idea himself, but nevertheless mentions it to another, and that other person advances the money, and negotiates direct with the principal, the agent is not entitled to commission; and there the chief justice pointed out that “ commission was not due merely because in some way or other the loan followed, casually, indirectly, and as a remote consequence. It must appear that the advance was by or through the agency.” See, also, Antrobus v. Wickens, 4 F. & F. 291. The parties stipulated that after a setting aside of the general verdict, a dismissal could follow as though before the verdict. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.
No. 99-8806.

#### Young *v.*Smeeks.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**November 31**

**, 2015** 

**U. S**

**. Department of**  **Transportation Docket Management System**  **1200 New Jersey Ave., SE**  **Washington, DC 20590** 

**Re: Am endment to Exemption #11732 issued pursuant t o Section 333 of the FAA Reform**  **Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations** 

**Dear Sir or Madam:** 

**Terraplane, LLC was issued an Exemption numbered 11 732 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0007 (hereina**  **fter the “Exemption”) for the purpose of aerial acquisit**  **ion and research. Terraplane, LLC hereby requests and**  **amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional t ype of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully co**  **mplies with the conditions of the Exemption.** 

**Terraplane, LLC wishes to have available to operate a Lumenier QAV 500 V2 under the same terms and**  **conditions contained in the Exemption. Emailed as a confidential document (to Jake Troutman) is the A**  **ircraft**
**Manual for the additional UAS. The Lumenier QAV 50 0 V2 is of similar size, weight, and operation to t**  **he other UAS already approved in the Exemption. All operati**  **ons of the additional UAS will be in full complianc e with the**  **terms of the Exemption.**

**As this is an amendment to an existing exemption as king for only the addition on another type of unman**  **ned aerial vehicle, Terraplane, LLC respectfully submits that**  **good cause exists so that notice noes not need to b e published**  **in the Federal Register for the requested amendment**

**.**

**Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment t**  **o the Exemption.** 

**Sincerely yours,**

**Richard Harberts**

**148 Colchester Drive Iowa City, IA 52245** 

**319-621-1158**
=================================================================

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 102 SSM 8

In the Matter of Anthony J. 

Russo,

 Respondent,

 v.

New York City Department of 

Education, 

 Appellant.

Submitted by Kathy Chang Park, for appellant.

Submitted by Anthony J. Russo, respondent, pro se.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, New York

City Department of Education's cross motion to dismiss the

petition granted in its entirety, and certified question answered

in the negative. We cannot say that "the penalty of

[termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience" (Matter of

Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board

of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale &

Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]). 

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided April 7, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                      1,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,326
<PP&E>                                           5,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           265
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,317
<SALES>                                          3,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,886
<CGS>                                            2,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,240)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.215 Basis of payment. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided under § 413.235 or § 413.174(f) of this part, effective January 1, 2011, ESRD facilities receive a predetermined per treatment payment amount described in § 413.230 of this part, for renal dialysis services, specified under section 1881(b)(14) of the Act and as defined in § 413.217 of this part, furnished to Medicare Part B fee-for-service beneficiaries.
( b ) In addition to the per-treatment payment amount, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, the ESRD facility may receive payment for bad debts of Medicare beneficiaries as specified in § 413.89(h)(3).
[75 FR 49200, Aug. 12, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 77965, Nov. 4, 2016]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Zambian Foreign Minister Kakubo

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Zambian Foreign Minister Kakubo							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 19, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary Wendy Sherman met today in Washington with a Zambian government delegation that included Foreign Minister Stanley Kakubo, Secretary of the Treasury Felix Nkulukusa, and interim National Security Advisor Lawrence Mwananyanda.  The Deputy Secretary thanked Zambia for its unwavering support against the war on Ukraine, including at the United Nations and other multilateral institutions, and expressed support for Zambia’s political and economic renewal, including ongoing multilateral efforts to restructure Zambia’s external debt.  The officials discussed the strong U.S.-Zambia partnership and opportunities to strengthen the trade and investment relationship, based on mutual prosperity for both countries.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraineZambia

Back to Top
# ____________________

# .........

SERVED: DECEMBER21, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF TRANS TIME EXPRESS FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1260
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OFPROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No.**2011SW7002~0)** has been assigned to the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, theFAAHearing**Docket~** and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### CameronNiakan, Respondent's Counsel 

### 10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 Rockville, MD 20852 TEL: 202-276-4726 FAX: (None Listed) EMAIL: cn@Niakanlaw.com Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel 

### Sabrina Jawed, Complainant's Counsel 

### EnforcementDivision, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, FAA 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-3357 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

### ONE COPY

Chief Administrative LawJudge 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Wincroft, Inc. (the "Company") of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  February 14, 2006
# Portugal

69 items

        -    Report  		Portugal	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Portugal	  August 15, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (17-709) – Agreement on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue	  July 9, 2017 
        -    Report  		Portugal	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Portugal	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Portugal	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (16-810) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  August 10, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (15-713) – Agreement Concerning the Continuation of the Commission for Educational Exchange	  July 13, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (14-220) – Employment Agreement on Gainful Activities of the Dependents of Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts Assigned to Official Duty	  February 20, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (11-1129) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Crime	  November 29, 2011 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











I,
      Dennis
      J. FitzSimons, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune
      Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      Sept. 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and the results of operations of Tribune
      Company.














/s/
                Dennis J. FitzSimons
              Dennis
                J. FitzSimons
              Chairman,
                President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              
              November
                2, 2007
# C_2006009EN.01001202.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4058 — Logista/Planeta de Agostini/JV)

(2006/C 9/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 92.5 Procedure governing availability of Bureau of the Mint records. ( a ) *Regulations of the Office of the Secretary adopted.* The regulations on the Disclosure of Records of the Office of the Secretary and other bureaus and offices of the Department issued under 5 U.S.C. 301 and 552 and published as part 1 of this title, 32 FR No. 127, July 1, 1967, except for § 1.7 of this title entitled “Appeal,” shall govern the availability of Bureau of the Mint records.
( b ) *Determination of availability.* The Director of the Mint delegates authority to the following Mint officials to determine, in accordance with part 1 of this title, which of the records or information requested is available, subject to the appeal provided in § 92.6: The Deputy Director of the Mint, Division Heads in the Office of the Director, and the Superintendent or Officer in Charge of the field office where the record is located.
( c ) *Requests for identifiable records.* A written request for an identifiable record shall be addressed to the Director of the Mint, Washington, DC 20220. A request presented in person shall be made in the public reading room of the Treasury Department, 15th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, or in such other office designated by the Director of the Mint.
| A COMPENDIUM OF        LAW ENFORCEMENT         OLDER DRIVER         PROGRAMS 
U.S. Department of Transportation**National        Highway Traffic Safety Administration**

**Introduction** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Entities Supporting Trade of Iranian Petroleum and Petrochemical Products

# 									Designation of Entities Supporting Trade of Iranian Petroleum and Petrochemical Products							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 1, 2022

The United States is designating six entities facilitating illicit transactions related to Iranian petroleum as well as petroleum and petrochemical products, key sources of revenue for the Iranian government.

The Department of State is designating Pioneer Ship management PTE LTD, a company that managed one liquified petroleum gas tanker, for serving as the commercial manager for a vessel that transported Iranian petroleum products. The Department is also designating Golden Warrior Shipping, Co. Ltd., that has engaged in transactions related to Iranian petroleum and petroleum products, to include providing logistical support to the Iranian petroleum trade. The Department is further identifying the vessel Glory Harvest as blocked property of Golden Warrior Shipping Co. Ltd.

All of these actions are being taken pursuant to section 3(a)(ii) of Executive Order 13846.

In addition, the Department of the Treasury is designating four entities that support Iran’s Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industry Commercial Co., a U.S.-designated entity, which continues to be involved in the sale of Iranian petroleum products and petrochemical products abroad.

The United States has been sincere in pursuing a path of meaningful diplomacy to achieve a mutual return to full implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Until Iran is ready to return to full implementation of the JCPOA, we will continue to use our sanctions authorities to target exports of petroleum, petroleum products, and petrochemical products from Iran.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsChinaIranOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,017,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                   197,452
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,723,639
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,532,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,345,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,832,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,031,618
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,481,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,345,964
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,874,369
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,543,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             651,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,679,774
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,679,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,679,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>