Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 2, 2009 / Notices 45473 

APPENDIX—Continued 

[TAA petitions instituted between 7/6/09 and 7/10/09] 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

71603 ................ Roush Industries, Inc. (Comp) ............................................. Allen Park, MI ....................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71604 ................ Rockland Industries, Inc. (Comp) ......................................... Baltimore, MD ....................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71605 ................ Suzlon Rotor Company (State) ............................................ Pipestone, MN ...................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71606 ................ Ridgway Powdered Metals, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................... Ridgway, PA ......................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71607 ................ Wisconsin Mechanical, LLC (State) ..................................... Waukesha, WI ....................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71608 ................ Xilinx, Inc. (Wkrs) ................................................................. San Jose, CA ........................ 07/09/09 07/07/09 

71609 ................ EDS, an HP Company (Comp) ............................................ St. Charles, MO .................... 07/09/09 07/02/09 

71610 ................ DJO, Inc. (formally Enclore Medical, LP/Chattanooga Grp) 

(Comp).

Hixson, TN ............................ 07/09/09 07/02/09 

71611 ................ ATT (Wkrs) ........................................................................... Hoffman Estate, IL ................ 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71612 ................ Ameriprise Financial (State) ................................................. Minneapolis, MN ................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71613 ................ Cherne Industries (State) ..................................................... Minneapolis, MN ................... 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71614 ................ EGS Electrical Group/O–Z Gedney Company (Comp) ........ Shoemakersville, PA ............. 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71615 ................ Frontier Airlines, Inc. (Wkrs) ................................................. Denver, CO ........................... 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71616 ................ Digi International (Comp) ..................................................... Minnetonka, MN .................... 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71617 ................ Tube City/IMS (USW) ........................................................... Gary, IN ................................. 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71618 ................ Volvo Trucks North America (UAW) .................................... Dublin, VA ............................. 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71619 ................ Freescale Semiconductor (Wkrs) ......................................... Austin, TX ............................. 07/09/09 07/01/09 

71620 ................ Circuit City (State) ................................................................ Coon Rapids, MN ................. 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71621 ................ Sealy Mattress Company (Wkrs) ......................................... Trinity, NC ............................. 07/09/09 06/30/09 

71622 ................ Vision Custom Tooling, Inc. (Comp) .................................... Birdsboro, PA ........................ 07/09/09 07/09/09 

71623 ................ Eagle of New Bedford (State) .............................................. New Bedford, MA .................. 07/09/09 07/06/09 

71624 ................ Teknor Apex (IBT) ................................................................ Hebronville, MA ..................... 07/09/09 07/08/09 

71625 ................ Eaton (Wkrs) ......................................................................... Shawnee, OK ........................ 07/10/09 07/09/09 

71626 ................ Robinson Steel (USW) ......................................................... East Chicago, IN ................... 07/10/09 07/08/09 

71627 ................ Circuit Board Express, Inc. (Wkrs) ....................................... Haverhill, MA ......................... 07/10/09 07/06/09 

71628 ................ Meridian Automotive Systems (Wkrs) .................................. Grand Rapids, MI .................. 07/10/09 07/08/09 

71629 ................ Hub City (IAM) ...................................................................... Aberdeen, SD ....................... 07/10/09 07/01/09 

[FR Doc. E9–21154 Filed 9–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of July 27 through August 14, 

2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
45474 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 2, 2009 / Notices 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,683; Freeport—McMoran, 

Inc., Morenci, AZ: March 23, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,577; Behr Dayton Thermal 

Products, a Subsidiary of Behr 

America, Dayton, OH: March 11, 

2008. 

TA–W–65,808A; Qimonda North 

America, Cary Burlington Division, 

Williston, VT: April 15, 2008. 

TA–W–65,808B; Qimonda North 

America, Houston Division, 

Houston, TX: April 15, 2008. 

TA–W–65,808C; Qimonda North 

America, Austin Division, Austin, 

TX: April 15, 2008. 

TA–W–65,808; Qimonda North 

America, San Jose Division, San 

Jose, CA: April 15, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,402; Ideal Products, LLC, 

Brown Falls, CT: February 25, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–65,634; Northern Engraving 

Corporation, Spring Grove, MN. 

TA–W–65,720; Roseburg Forest 

Products, Plywood Division, Riddle 

Plywood #4, Riddle, OR. 

TA–W–65,784; Oval International, 

Hoquiam, WA. 

TA–W–65,883; Muth Mirror Systems, 

Sheboygan, WI. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of July 27 

through August 14, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 169 / Wednesday, September 2, 2009 / Notices 45475 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Dated: August 18, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–21156 Filed 9–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–63,439; TA–W–63,439A] 

Watson Laboratories, Inc., a 

Connecticut Corporation, Carmel, NY; 

Watson Laboratories, Inc., a 

Connecticut Corporation Also Known 

as Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., Danbury, 

CT; Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on June 20, 2008, applicable 

to workers of Watson Laboratories, Inc., 

a Connecticut Corporation, Carmel, New 

York. The notice was published in the 

Federal Register on July 14, 2008 (73 FR 

40388). The certification was amended 

on May 18, 2009 to include workers of 

the certified worker group located at an 

off-site facility in Danbury, Connecticut. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on June 18, 2009 (74 FR 28957). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers produce pharmaceuticals and 

medicines. 

New information shows that some 

workers separated from employment at 

the Danbury, Connecticut location had 

their wages reported under a separated 

unemployment insurance (UI) tax 

account for Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers at 

the subject firm who were adversely 

affected by the shift in production of 

pharmaceuticals and medicines to India 

and their subsequent import. 

Accordingly the Department is 

amending this certification to include 

workers of the Danbury, Connecticut 

location whose (UI) wages are reported 

under the also known as name Danbury 

Pharmacal, Inc. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–64,439 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

‘‘All workers of Watson Laboratories Inc., 

a Connecticut Corporation, Carmel, New 

York (TA–W–63,439) and Watson 

Laboratories, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, 

also known as Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., 

Danbury, Connecticut (TA–W–63,439A), who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after May 27, 2007 

through June 20, 2010, are eligible to apply 

for adjustment assistance under Section 223 

of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible 

to apply for alternative trade adjustment 

assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act 

of 1974.’’ 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of 

August 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–21157 Filed 9–1–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of July 13 through 

July 24, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Under Section 222(a)(2)(B), all of 

the following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES