alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)
 
 The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
  Dated this 10th day of March, 2004.
 
 
 /s/ *Michael E. Ricketson*Michael E. RicketsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Oldham, Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Oldham                                                                  
|Paul Oldham                                                                      
|Vice President of Administration, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
|                                                                                 
|Dated: November 4, 2009                                                          

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other
purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006060EN.01000801.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-361/04 P: Claude Ruiz-Picasso, Paloma Ruiz-Picasso, Maya Widmaier-Picasso, Marina Ruiz-Picasso, Bernard Ruiz-Picasso v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Word mark PICARO - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark PICASSO)

(2006/C 60/15)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-361/04 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged on 18 August 2004, by Claude Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Paris (France), Paloma Ruiz-Picasso, residing in London (United Kingdom), Maya Widmaier-Picasso, residing in Paris, Marina Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Geneva (Switzerland), Bernard Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Paris, (represented by C. Gielen, advocaat), the other parties to the proceedings being the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and A. von Mühlendahl), defendant at first instance, and DaimlerChrysler AG (represented by S. Völker, Rechtsanwalt), intervener at first instance — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, K. Lenaerts and E. Juhász, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Claude Ruiz-Picasso, Mrs Paloma Ruiz-Picasso, Mrs Maya Widmaier-Picasso, Mrs Marina Ruiz-Picasso and Mr Bernard Ruiz-Picasso to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Claude Ruiz-Picasso, Mrs Paloma Ruiz-Picasso, Mrs Maya Widmaier-Picasso, Mrs Marina Ruiz-Picasso and Mr Bernard Ruiz-Picasso to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2982

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey

State of Alabama.the Carbon Hill National Fish Hatchery to the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2982

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Carbon

Hill National Fish Hatchery to the State of Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2982 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carbon Hill National

3 Fish Hatchery Conveyance Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CARBON HILL NATIONAL FISH

5 HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA.

6 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

8 of the Interior shall convey to the State of Alabama with9 out reimbursement, all right, title, and interest of the

10 United States in and to the property described in sub11 section (b), for use by the Game and Fish Division of the

12 Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Re13 sources, as part of the State of Alabama fish culture pro14 gram.

15 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred

16 to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Carbon

17 Hill National Fish Hatchery, located on County Road 63

18 at Carbon Hill, Alabama, in Walker County, Alabama,

19 consisting of 67 acres (more or less), and all improvements

20 and related personal property under the control of the Sec21 retary that is located on that property, including build22 ings, structures, equipment, and all easements, leases, and

23 water rights relating to that property.

24 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The prop25 erty conveyed to the State of Alabama pursuant to this

26 section shall be used by the State for purposes of fishery
3

•HR 2982 EH

1 resources management and fisheries-related activities, and

2 if it is used for any other purpose detrimental to those

3 purposes and activities, all right, title, and interest in and

4 to all property conveyed pursuant to this section shall re5 vert to the United States. The State of Alabama shall en6 sure that the property reverting to the United States is

7 in substantially the same or better condition as at the time

8 of transfer.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2005205EN.01000401.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 30 June 2005

in Case C-28/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris): Tod's SpA, Tod's France SARL v Heyraud SA (1)

1

(Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality - Copyright and related rights)

(2005/C 205/07)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-28/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France), made by decision of 5 December 2003, received at the Court on 28 January 2004, in the proceedings between Tod's SpA, Tod's France SARL and Heyraud SA, intervener: Technisynthèse, the Court: (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General: R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 June 2005, in which it ruled:

Article 12 EC, which lays down the general principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality, must be interpreted as meaning that the right of an author to claim in a Member State the copyright protection afforded by the law of that State may not be subject to a distinguishing criterion based on the country of origin of the work.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20.03.2004

1

---
#### Jerry R. GEISLER, Appellant, v. Sheila Sue GEISLER, now known as Sheila Sue Newcomb, Appellee.

No. 81-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 8, 1981.

*1217Clifford M. Abies, III, of Hancock & Abies, P. A., Sebring, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

Jerry R. Geisler appeals the order granting immediate custody of the parties’ minor children to appellee Sheila Sue Geisler. We reverse.

Appellee moved on December 15,1980 for enforcement of the terms of an Ohio divorce decree. The motion alleged that a copy of the decree awarding appellee custody of the parties’ children had been filed with the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court Clerk, that appellant had physical possession of the children and that appellant had refused to deliver them to appellee. Appel-lee alleged that she was entitled to have the foreign decree enforced under the provisions of section 61.1332, Florida Statutes (1979).

On December 15, 1980, the judge below entered an order giving full force and effect to the Ohio decree, directing that custody be delivered to appellee, and ordering all sheriffs to assist appellee in execution. No notice was given to appellant. The order was signed on the same day the motion was filed and the certificate of service on the motion indicated service to appellant by mail.

Section 61.131, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that “before a decree is made under this act, reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard shall be given to the contestants.... ” Section 61.1306(4) defines “decree” as “a custody determination contained in a judicial decree or order made in a custody proceeding....” After studying the record and brief of appellant,1 we hold that the order below directing delivery of custody to appellee was a decree and that reasonable notice to appellant was required before entry. *See Alarcon v. Alarcon,*370 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

We reverse the order below and remand for a full hearing with proper notice to appellant. Until that hearing is held, we direct that the parties be returned to their prior position so that appellant has physical custody of the minor children.

OTT, Acting C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concurs.

1

. We note with disdain that appellee failed to file a brief in this proceeding. Failure to file a brief places an undue burden on the appellate court and reflects an omission of appellee’s responsibility to support the trial court. If the ruling of the trial court is not worthy of support, then appellee ought to confess error and join with the appellant in seeking a reversal.
#### JENNIE McCarthy McMATH, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THOMAS McMATH, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[51 C. Cls., 356; 248 U. S., 151.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

Revised Statutes, section 2621, authorizes collectors to employ, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, weighers at the several ports, and does not prescribe their number; the act of July 26, 1866, chapter 269, section 3, 14 Stat., 289, fixes their salaries at $2,500; Revised Statutes, section 2634, authorizes the Secretary to fix the number and compensation of clerks to be employed by any collector. McMath received successive appointments as clerk “ to act as acting United States weigher,” at compensations less than $2,500 per annum, and took oath as such. *Held,*that the fact that he was assigned, and performed, the duties of weigher did not place him in that office and entitle him to its salary.

Mr. Justice Brakdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court December 9, 1918.
#### § 38.9 Federal audits.

The Secretary, the Administrator, and the Comptroller General of the United States, or their duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records that pertain to Federal funds, equipment, and supplies received under this part for the purpose of audit and examination.
40697.

#### PICKENS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The judgment of this court *(Pickens v. State,*109 Ga. App. 747, 137 SE2d 404), dismissing the writ of error, having been reversed by the Supreme *644Court of Georgia *(Pickens v. State,*220 Ga. 329, 138 SE2d 655), the judgment of this court is vacated.

Decided November *4, 1964*

Rehearing denied November 17, 1964.

*Jean E. Johnson, Sr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*George D. Lawrence, Solicitor General,*contra.

2. The facts of this case raise a question indentical to the question decided in *Fair v. State,*ante; therefore, this case is controlled by the decision in *Fair v. State,*and the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
#### § 8.34 Knowledge of client's omission.

Each attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner who knows that a client has not complied with applicable law, or has made an error in or omission from any document, affidavit, or other paper which the law requires the client to execute, shall advise the client promptly of the fact of such noncompliance, error, or omission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000726990
<NAME> UNITED SECURITY BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           18635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2793
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      56907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             749
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               752
<LOANS>                                         399604
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  504094
<DEPOSITS>                                      428849
<SHORT-TERM>                                     11825
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4039
<LONG-TERM>                                        701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         44447
<OTHER-SE>                                       14233
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  504094
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  19057
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2122
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   186
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 21365
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7295
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7526
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            13839
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      517
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  66
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   9640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7452
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        7452
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5004
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.13
<LOANS-NON>                                       2395
<LOANS-PAST>                                       485
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3819
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      505
<RECOVERIES>                                       165
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3996
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3996
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.7


 


SUBSCRIPTION OF SHARE(S)


 


Date [___]


 


		TO :	The Board of Director(s)



Ace Global Business Acquisition Limited


British Virgin Islands


 


Dear Sir,


 


We hereby apply for ______ ordinary share(s) for USD$____ in
the capital of your Company.


 


Yours faithfully,


For and on behalf of


 


	 	 
	[Name]	 


 


		Address:	Corporate Registrations Limited, Sea Meadow House, Blackburne
Highway, P.O. Box 116, Road Town, Tortola, BVI



		Occupation:	Corporation
#### Thomas Dorr FELDMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 405.2415 Incident to services and direct supervision. ( a ) Services and supplies incident to the services of a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, certified nurse midwife, clinical psychologist, clinical social worker, marriage and family therapist, or mental health counselor are payable under this subpart if the service or supply is all of the following: ( 1 ) Of a type commonly furnished in physicians' offices.
( 2 ) Of a type commonly rendered either without charge or included in the RHC's or FQHC's bill.
( 3 ) Furnished as an incidental, although integral part of professional services furnished by a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, certified nurse-midwife, clinical psychologist, clinical social worker, marriage and family therapist, or mental health counselor.
( 4 ) Furnished in accordance with applicable State law.
( 5 ) Furnished under the direct supervision of a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or certified nurse-midwife, except that services and supplies furnished incident to Transitional Care Management, General Care Management, the Psychiatric Collaborative Care model, and behavioral health services can be furnished under general supervision of a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or certified nurse-midwife, when these services or supplies are furnished by auxiliary personnel, as defined in § 410.26(a)(1) of this chapter.
( b ) The direct supervision requirement is met in the case of any of the following persons only if the person is permitted to supervise these services under the written policies governing the RHC or FQHC: ( 1 ) Nurse practitioner.
( 2 ) Physician assistant.
( 3 ) Certified nurse-midwife.
( 4 ) Clinical psychologist.
( 5 ) Clinical social worker.
( 6 ) Marriage and family therapist.
( 7 ) Mental health counselor.
( c ) Only drugs and biologicals which cannot be self-administered are included within the scope of this benefit.
[79 FR 25475, May 2, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 68001, Nov. 13, 2014; 81 FR 80552, Nov. 15, 2016; 82 FR 53358, Nov. 15, 2017; 88 FR 79523, Nov. 16, 2023]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 16, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 16, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0023. TRACY MAY BLOUNT v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### § 137.49 What if a Self-Governance Tribe requests such incorporation at the negotiation stage of a compact or funding agreement?

In that event, such incorporation shall be deemed effective immediately and shall control the negotiation and resulting compact and funding agreement.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                              ----------

              TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew L.
Simon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I,
James J. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
           in all material respects, the financial condition and
           result of operations of the Company.

March 20, 2007                              /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
                                            ---------------------------
                                            President, Chief Executive
                                            Officer

March 20, 2007                              /s/ JAMES J. WILLIAMS
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR
OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN
THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE
ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE
ASSOCIATES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.