alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000726990
<NAME> UNITED SECURITY BANCORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           16790
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            7004
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      67849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             750
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               774
<LOANS>                                         374020
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  495274
<DEPOSITS>                                      433191
<SHORT-TERM>                                       408
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4580
<LONG-TERM>                                        707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         44447
<OTHER-SE>                                       11941
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  495274
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9299
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1213
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   100
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 10612
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3675
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3714
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3898
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      267
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  42
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3078
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3078
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.17
<LOANS-NON>                                       2188
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1262
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3819
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      332
<RECOVERIES>                                        27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3781
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3781
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3133

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel KARMA.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 1996

Mr. SCARBOROUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

KARMA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 3133 IH

1 trade for the vessel KARMA (United States official num2 ber 661709).

Æ
# C_2006036EN.01000401.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 1 December 2005

in Case C-301/03: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Structural funds - Eligibility of expenditure - Amendments to programme complements - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 36/06)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-301/03: Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by G. Aiello and A. Cingolo, avvocati dello Stato) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. de March and L. Flynn, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, avvocato), ACTION for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 2 July 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 December 2005, in which it:

Italian Republic

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.9.2003.

1

---
# C_2005222EN.01000601.xml

| 9.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3908 — ABN AMRO/IMCD)

(2005/C 222/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3908. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3908. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           SOUTHSIDE BANCSHARES CORP.

                   Computation of Net Income Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,

                                                            1996                1995               1994
                                                          --------            --------           --------
 <S>                                                   <C>                 <C>                <C>
 Primary(1)
   Earnings
        Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $6,158,000          $6,754,000         $5,014,000

        Weighted daily average number of common
        shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .        2,712,775           2,643,890          2,591,440

        Net income per common share  . . . . . .            $2.27               $2.55              $1.93
                                                            =====               =====              =====
 Assuming Full Dilution (1)(2)
        Earnings
                Net Income . . . . . . . . . . .        6,158,000           6,784,000          5,014,000

          Weighted daily average number of
                common shares outstanding  . . .        2,712,775           2,643,890          2,591,440
 weighted average common stock equivalents due to
 the dilutive effect of stock options when
 utilizing the Treasury stock method.  Per share
 market price is based on the average per share            14,988               6,611              5,313
 market price for the period . . . . . . . . . . .

 Total weighted average common shares and stock
 equiivalents outstanding  . . . . . . . . . . . .      2,727,763           2,650,501          2,596,753

 Net income per common share assuming
          full dilution  . . . . . . . . . . . . .          $2.26               $2.54              $1.93
</TABLE>


Notes:
(1)      Daily average shares outstanding for all years have been adjusted to
         reflect a 10 for 1 stock split in 1996.

(2)      This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item
         801(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
         Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... annual report[electronic resource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:ER 4/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000637338
 
September 16, 2019
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose
of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any purposes.

         In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.




March 30, 2004                                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
--------------                                   --------------------
     Date                                        Joseph M. Jayson
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2005 — Suproco v Commission

(Case T-101/03) (1)

(Association of the OCTs - Sugar not entitled to OCT origin - Request for a derogation from the rules of origin - Rejection of the request for a derogation - Duty to give reasons)

(2005/C 281/35)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant(s): Suproco (Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles) (represented by M. Slotboom and N.J. Helder, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by T. van Rijn and X. Lewis, agents)

Intervener(s) in support of the applicant(s): Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by H. Sevenster, agent)

Intervener(s) in support of the defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by initially by G. Houttuin and M. Bishop, and subsequently by G. Houttuin and D. Canga Fano, agents) and by Kingdom of Spain (represented by N. Díaz Abad, lawyer)

Application for

the annulment of Commission Decision 2003/34/EC of 10 January 2003 refusing to grant a derogation from Council Decision 2001/822/EC, as regards the rules of origin for sugar from the Netherlands Antilles (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 50)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 135, 7.6.2003.

----
#### Morris A. Fierberg *v.*Thomas F. Moulton.

Mambie. C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued December 2

decided December 28, 1942.

*Morris Blumer,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Charles H. Blackall,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages which he claimed resulted from the fact that, after he had stopped his car at a street intersection, the defendant’s car, following, collided with its rear, and has appealed from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant. The assignments of error, except for an incidental attempt to correct the finding not necessary to consider, are addressed to the charge of the court. The plaintiff’s principal claim is that the court erred in submitting to the jury for their determination as an issue the question whether or not the plaintiff gave any signal *537of his intention to stop, contending, correctly, that no such issue was presented by the respective claims of proof of the parties; the trial court did not submit that issue to the jury, but did charge them quite fully as to whether the hand signal which the plaintiff claimed he gave would constitute a proper and adequate signal under § 637c of the 1935 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes; we cannot hold that this issue was not properly presented to the jury, in view of the claims of proof, which state no details as to the manner in which the signal was given. The trial court’s charge as to the effect of an emergency upon the issue whether the defendant exercised proper care finds like support in the defendant’s claims of proof that the plaintiff’s car came to a sudden stop, considered in the light of the other circumstances surrounding the collision claimed to have been proved; nor was there any need for the trial court to define the word “emergency,” used as it was in the charge with its ordinary significance. Conn. App. Proc., § 50. The reference to unavoidable accidents was merely in elucidation of the general statements of the court as to the duty of exercising reasonable care and for that purpose was relevant and proper.

There is no error.
#### Mrs. Daisy LeBLANC v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.

No. 80-C-1941.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 24, 1980.

In re Mrs. Daisy LeBlanc, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 393 So.2d 125.

Denied. Result is correct.

DIXON, C. J., would grant the writ.
HomeGlobal Social Media Presence...Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

# 									Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs							

## 								Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs Social Media Sites							

        - Argentina
        - Barbados
        - Belize
        - Bolivia
        - Brazil
        - Canada
        - Chile
        - Colombia
        - Costa Rica
        - Cuba
        - Curacao
        - Dominican Republic
        - Ecuador
        - El Salvador
        - Guatemala
        - Guyana
        - Haiti
        - Honduras
        - Jamaica
        - Mexico
        - Nicaragua
        - Panama
        - Paraguay
        - Peru
        - Suriname
        - The Bahamas
        - Trinidad and Tobago
        - United States
        - Uruguay
        - Venezuela

Tags

Bureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with NATO Permanent Representatives

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with NATO Permanent Representatives							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 20, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Brussels with NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană and NATO Permanent Representatives.  Deputy Secretary Sherman discussed continued strong coordination at NATO to ensure robust deterrence and defense, and shared U.S. priorities for NATO’s next Strategic Concept, which will make clear that NATO is stronger and more united than ever.  She noted U.S. concerns about the PRC’s support for Russia’s aggression, including through its amplification of Russian disinformation about NATO and Russia’s war in Ukraine, and called for continued strong Transatlantic coordination to defend the rules-based international order.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,900
<SECURITIES>                                     1,172
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                       149
<INVENTORY>                                      8,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,191
<PP&E>                                          28,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        10,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,138
<SALES>                                         31,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,761
<CGS>                                           18,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 137.286 Do Self-Governance Tribes become Federal agencies when they assume these Federal environmental responsibilities?

No, while Self-Governance Tribes are required to assume Federal environmental responsibilities for projects in place of the Secretary, Self-Governance Tribes do not thereby become Federal agencies. However, because Self-Governance Tribes are assuming the responsibilities of the Secretary for the purposes of performing these Federal environmental responsibilities, Self-Governance Tribes will be considered the equivalent of Federal agencies for certain purposes as set forth in this subpart.
#### § 137.71 May the Secretary and the Self-Governance Tribe develop separate programmatic reporting requirements for statutorily mandated grants?

Yes, the Secretary and the Self-Governance Tribe may develop separate programmatic reporting requirements for statutorily mandated grants.
#### GRADY’S 10¢ HAMBURGER HUTS, INC. v. Cled E. GREGORY.

No. 47735.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 7, 1974.

Thomas, Price, Alston, Jones & Davis, David H. Nutt, Jackson, for appellant.

Mitchell M. Lundy, Grenada, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Grenada County; Kermit R. Cofer, Chancellor.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### § 110.80 Calculation of medical benefits.

In calculating medical benefits, the Secretary will take into consideration all reasonable costs for reasonable and necessary medical items and services to diagnose or treat a countermeasure recipient's covered injury, or to diagnose, treat, or prevent its health complications, as described in § 110.31. The Secretary will consider and may rely upon benefits documentation submitted by the requester (*e.g.,* bills, Explanation of Benefits, and cost-related documentation to support the expenses relating to the covered injury or its health complications), as required by § 110.60. The Secretary will make such payments only to the extent that such costs were not, and will not be, paid by any third-party payer and only if no third-party payer had or has an obligation to pay for or provide such services or items to the requester, except as provided in §§ 110.83(c) and 110.84. There are no caps on the benefits for reasonable and necessary medical expenses that may be provided under the Program.
§ 403.1204 Compliance. ( a ) *Identification of non-compliant products.* The Secretary will maintain a public list that will include the prescription drugs and biological products identified by the Secretary to be advertised in violation of this subpart.
( b ) *State or local requirements.* No State or political subdivision of any State may establish or continue in effect any requirement concerning the disclosure in a television advertisement of the pricing of a prescription drug or biological product which is different from, or in addition to, any requirement imposed by this subpart.