alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomePoland

# Poland

185 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Polish Foreign Minister Rau	  February 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 11, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 11, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Congratulatory Message on the 30th Anniversary of the Visegrád Group (V4)	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Poland	  January 20, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (20-1113) – Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement	  November 13, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Poland	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Joint Statement  		COVID-19 and Religious Minorities Pandemic Statement	  August 20, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Poland	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Poland	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Poland	  June 10, 2020 

previous page1…1213141516…19next page

Back to Top
Subject: RTCA, INC. DOCUMENT Date: 12/20/05 AC No: 21-16E 

RTCA/DO-160E, ENVIRONMENTAL Initiated By: AIR-100 Change:

 CONDITIONS AND TEST PROCEDURES 

 FOR AIRBORNE EQUIPMENT 

1. PURPOSE. 

 a. This advisory circular (AC) identifies RTCA, Inc. document RTCA/DO-160E, 

Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment, dated 

December 9, 2004, as containing acceptable environmental qualifications for showing 

compliance with certain airworthiness requirements. We wrote this AC for applicants for type 

certificates, supplemental type certificates and technical standard order (TSO) authorizations.

 b. Other FAA policy and guidance may take precedence over the requirements contained in

RTCA/DO-160E. This AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. In it, we 

describe acceptable means, but not the only means, to comply with airworthiness standards. 

2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancels AC 21-16D, RTCA Document DO-160D, dated 

July 21, 1998. 

3. WHY USE RTCA/DO-160E? RTCA/DO-160E defines standard environmental test 

conditions (categories) and applicable test procedures for airborne equipment. These tests 

provide a laboratory means of determining the performance characteristics of airborne equipment 

in environmental conditions. These same conditions may be encountered in the airborne 

operation of the equipment. 

4. WHEN TO USE RTCA/DO-160E. 

 a. When applying for a TSO authorization for airborne equipment, you may use the 

conditions and procedures in RTCA/DO-160E instead of the same conditions and procedures 

specified in a TSO, if: 
AC 21-16E 12/20/05 

 (1) Conditions and procedures used are those prescribed in RTCA/DO-160E. 

 (2) The substitute test procedures from RTCA/DO-160E provide an equivalent level of 

safety, and 

 (3) You request approval to deviate in accordance with the requirements of Title 14 of 

the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 21.609. 

b. When applying for a type certificate or supplemental type certificate, you may use 

RTCA/DO-160E to show compliance with appropriate airworthiness requirements, when agreed 

to by your cognizant aircraft certification office. 

 

5. RELATED DOCUMENTS AND HOW TO GET THEM. 

a. Order copies of RTCA documents from RTCA Inc., 1828 L Street, NW, Suite 805, 

Washington DC 20036-4007. Telephone (202) 833-(339, fax (202) 833-9434. You can also 

order copies from the RTCA Internet website at http://www.rtca.org/. 

b. Order copies of 14 CFR part 21 from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. 

Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA 15250-7954. Telephone 

(202) 512-1800, fax (202) 512-2104. You can get free copies from the Government Printing 

Office Internet website at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/index.html. 

Susan J. M. Cabler 

Acting Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division 

Aircraft Certification Service 

Page 2
#### Gregory KWOKA et al., Petitioners, v. Richard CAMPBELL et al., Respondents.

No. 46034.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 3, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 296 So.2d 629.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
# Palestinian Territories

506 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 12, 2022	  Ned PriceApril 12, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 31, 2022	  Ned PriceMarch 31, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas After Their Meeting 	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 27, 2022Muqata’a Ramallah, the West Bank  
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Roundtable with Palestinian Civil Society 	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 27, 2022America House Jerusalem Jerusalem  
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Middle East Partnership for Peace Act Event	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 27, 2022The David CitadelJerusalem 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Support for the Palestinian People 	  March 26, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs Yael Lempert on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Israel, the West Bank, Morocco, and Algeria	  Ned PriceMarch 24, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2022	  Jalina PorterMarch 18, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 10, 2022	  Ned PriceMarch 10, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 23, 2022	  Ned PriceFebruary 23, 2022Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…4041424344…51next page

Back to Top
# C_2006048EN.01003103.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 December 2005 — Just v Commission

(Case T-91/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Open competition - Multiple-choice questions - Accuracy of the answers on the correction form - Action manifestly unfounded in law)

(2006/C 48/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Alexander Just (Hoeilaart, Belgium) (represented by: G. Lebitsch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Krämer, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Application for

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition COM/A/2/02 to award the applicant, in respect of the pre-selection stage, a number of marks which did not allow him admission to the subsequent tests in that competition

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004

1

---
|   | By:    | /s/ Samuel      Zell    |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Samuel      Zell             |   |
|   |   | Chairman,      President and |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   | November      10, 2008       |   |
# C_2005217EN.01003205.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/32

---

Removal from the register of Joined Cases C-362/04, C-363/04, C-364/04 and C-365/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/68)

(Language of the case: Greek)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 21 June 2005 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Joined Cases C-362/04, C-363/04, C-364/04 and C-365/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling Symvoulio tis Epikrateias): Michaniki A.E., Tholos A.E. v Ypourgos Politismou, Ypourgos Perivallontos, Chorotaxias and Dimosion Ergon.

---

(1)  OJ C 273 of 06.11.2004.

1

OJ C 284 of 20.11.2004.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis J. FitzSimons, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Company, certify that (i)
Tribune Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of Tribune Company.



| | /s/ 
        Dennis J. FitzSimons         Dennis J. FitzSimons     
           Chairman, President and         Chief Executive Officer  
                  October 29, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HomeSouth Africa

# South Africa

178 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken at the Peace, Security, and Governance Forum	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022Walter E. Washington Convention CenterWashington, D.C.  
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Naledi Pandor	  December 8, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Sanctioning ISIS Members in South Africa	  Ned PriceNovember 7, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Trudeau Travels to South Africa, Tanzania, Liberia, and Belgium	  November 7, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt to Travel to South Africa, Morocco	  November 4, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks to the 8th African Conference on One Health and Biosecurity	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsNovember 2, 2022Virtual 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Naledi Pandor	  November 2, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		On the African Union-led Peace Talks	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 2, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 28, 2022	  Ned PriceOctober 28, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Pandor	  October 23, 2022 

previous page1…56789…18next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 23(b)

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   
     We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in (i) the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-68862)  pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan,
(ii) the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-09633)  pertaining to the
1995 Stock  Purchase  Plan,  (iii) the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.
2-86405)  pertaining  to the 1983 Key  Employees  Stock  Option  Plan,  (iv) the
Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-36795)  pertaining to the Long-Term
Incentive Plan and (v) the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-36199)
pertaining  to the Stock  Option  Plan for  Non-Employee  Directors,  which were
previously filed by Merrimac Industries,  Inc. (the "Company"), of our report on
the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, dated
February 18, 1997, which report appears  elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1999.


                                                         /s/ J.H. Cohn LLP
                                                         -----------------
                                                             J.H. Cohn LLP
                                          

      Roseland, New Jersey
      March 29, 1999



                                      -1-
# C_2006074EN.01003302.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/33

---

Action brought on 6 January 2006 — Frankin and Others v Commission

(Case F-3/06)

(2006/C 74/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Jacques Frankin (Sorée, Belgium) and Others (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the explicit decision of 10 June 2005 whereby the Commission refused to afford the applicants assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the explicit decision of 10 June 2005 whereby the Commission refused to afford the applicants assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Commission to make good all the loss thereby sustained by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to make good all the loss thereby sustained by the applicants;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, who are all officials or other servants of the Commission, had sought to have their pension entitlement acquired in Belgium transferred to the Community system, in accordance with the provisions of a Belgian law enacted in 1991. In 2003 Belgium enacted a new law, which, in the applicants' submission, provides more favourable for new transfers of that type. As the applicants had already transferred their rights, however, they were unable to take advantage of the provisions of the Law of 2003.

The applicants therefore submitted a request seeking to obtain the assistance provided for in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. The Commission, which had no intention of assisting its officials and temporary servants to secure those transfers, rejected their request by decision of 10 June 2005.

By their action, the applicants contest that decision, which they treat as a refusal to afford assistance, in breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. In addition to that article, they rely in support of their claims on a breach of the duty to have regard to the welfare of the staff, of the principle of non-discrimination, of the prohibition of unfair process, of the obligation to state reasons, of legitimate expections and of the rule patere legem quam ipse fecisti and on a misuse of powers.

patere legem quam ipse fecisti

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               





| | /s/ Robert W. McMartin                                                              
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert W. McMartin
Chief Financial Officer
Circuit Research Labs, Inc. 
May 15, 2007
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 23, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană today. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Deputy Secretary General Geoană discussed key priorities for the Washington Summit, including strengthening our shared commitment to Ukraine, furthering NATO’s Indo-Pacific partnerships, and building upon collective defense commitments.

Tags

Deputy Secretary of StateNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
PUBLIC LAW 114–181—JUNE 22, 2016 130 STAT. 447 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2212 (S. 1761): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–314 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 114–202 (Comm. on Indian Affairs) accompanying S. 1761. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Nov. 30, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 162 (2016): June 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–181 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To take certain Federal lands located in Lassen County, California, into trust 

for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SUSANVILLE INDIAN 

RANCHERIA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 

taken into trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, 

subject to valid existing rights. 

(b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust pursuant 

to subsection (a) is the approximately 301 acres of Federal land 

under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land 

Management identified as ‘‘Conveyance Boundary’’ on the map titled 

‘‘Susanville Indian Rancheria Land Conveyance’’ and dated 

December 31, 2014. 

(c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming under the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be allowed 

at any time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection 

(a). 

Approved June 22, 2016. 

June 22, 2016 

[H.R. 2212] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
40852.

#### BUFFORD v. FARMERS *&*MERCHANTS BANK.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The Farmers & Merchants Bank filed an action against Lester Bufford to recover on a note. On the call of the case, and after a jury was selected, the plaintiff failed to appear except by counsel and he could not announce ready in that none of his witnesses appeared in court. The defendant then moved to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution, but before the court could rule on the defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s counsel entered the following on the back of the original petition and delivered the same to the clerk: “This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice, at cost of plaintiff. May 7, 1964. Lawson E. Thompson, Plaintiff’s attorney.” The clerk then made the following entry *394thereon: “Dismissed—figure cost.” Later, on the same date, the trial court reinstated the case and set it for trial at the next term of court. The defendant demurred to such order of the trial court reinstating the case and error is assigned on the judgment reinstating the case as well as on the judgment overruling the demurrers which attacked the judgment. *Held:*

Decided October 2, 1964.

*Walton Hardin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lawson E. Thompson,*contra.

1. It does not appear from the record that the defendant’s rights were prejudiced by such dismissal of the action by the plaintiff.

2. “The plaintiff in any action, in any court, may dismiss his action either in vacation or term time, if he shall not thereby prejudice any right of the defendant . . .” *Code*§ 3-510.

3. “The dismissal of plaintiff’s petition removed the case from the court. *Harris v. Hines,*59 Ga. 427; *Spence v. Dyal,*202 Ga. 739 (44 SE2d 658). 'After . . . dismissal, there is no case in court. *(Whatley v. Slaton,*36 Ga. 653 (2); *Davenport v. Hardman,*184 Ga. 518 (1), 192 SE 11). *Trusco Finance Co. v. McGee,*206 Ga. 382, 384 (57 SE2d 184).” *Waldor v. Waldor,*217 Ga. 496 (1) (123 SE2d 660). See also *Simpson v. Brock,*114 Ga. 294 (40 SE 266); and *Petty v. Piedmont Fertilizer Co.,*146 Ga. 149 (90 SE 966).

4. The trial court was without authority to reinstate the case once it had been dismissed by the plaintiff’s attorney. *Simpson v. Brock,*114 Ga. 294, supra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Hall and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris               
|Nicholas Konidaris                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:
November 5, 2010

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 416.178 Limitations on administrative and judicial review. There is no administrative or judicial review under section 1869 of the Act, section 1878 of the Act, or otherwise of the following: ( a ) The classification system;
( b ) Relative weights;
( c ) Payment amounts; and
( d ) Geographic adjustment factors.