alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 110.62 Documentation a requester who is determined to be an eligible survivor must submit for the Secretary to make a determination of death benefits. ( a ) A requester determined by the Secretary to be an eligible survivor and who seeks a death benefit under § 110.82(b) (the standard calculation) must provide, in addition to the documentation submitted under subpart F of this part, a written certification informing the Secretary whether a disability or death benefit was paid or payable under the PSOB Program with respect to the deceased injured countermeasure recipient. If such benefit was provided, the requester must submit documentation showing the amount of the benefit paid by the PSOB Program. If the deceased injured countermeasure recipient was covered under the PSOB and no such benefit was, or will be provided, the certification must explain whether any survivors are eligible for a death benefit under the PSOB Program and, if so, whether a death benefit may be paid or payable under the PSOB Program.
( b ) The legal guardian seeking a death benefit under § 110.82(c) (the alternative calculation) on behalf of a dependent younger than the age of 18 determined by the Secretary to be an eligible survivor must provide, in addition to the documentation submitted under Subpart F of this part, the following: ( 1 ) Documentation showing that the deceased injured countermeasure recipient is survived by one or more dependents younger than the age of 18. Such documentation must show the date of birth of all such dependents (*e.g.,* copies of birth certificates);
( 2 ) Documentation showing that the requester is the legal guardian of all of the dependents described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, as required under § 110.63(a). If multiple dependents have different legal guardians, the legal guardian of each of the dependents must submit such documentation;
( 3 ) A written selection by each legal guardian, on behalf of all of the dependents described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section for whom he or she is the legal guardian, to receive proportional death benefits under the alternative calculation as described in § 110.82(c), in place of proportional benefits available under the standard calculation as described in § 110.82(b). Written selections are described in § 110.82(c)(1);
( 4 ) Documentation showing the deceased injured countermeasure recipient's gross employment income at the time the covered injury was sustained (*e.g.,* the decedent's Federal tax return or pay stub(s) from all employers at the time of the covered injury); and
( 5 ) A description of all third-party payers that have paid for, or that may be required to pay for, the benefits described in § 110.82(c)(3)(i). This description must include the amount of such benefits that have been paid or that may be paid in the future. If the representative knows of no such third-party payer, he or she must so certify in writing. If, at any time, the representative becomes aware that a third-party payer may have such an obligation, he or she must inform the Secretary within ten business days of becoming aware of this information, even after benefits have been paid by the Program.
EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Investment Holdings Group, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2023, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Anderson,
Director, President and Treasurer of the Company, and Glen Gomez, Vice President and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 20, 2023 | By: | /s/ JAMES
    ANDERSON                                                                    
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | James
                                            Anderson
    President
    and Treasurer



|Date: November 20, 2023 | By: | /s/ GLEN GOMEZ                                                                             
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Glen
                                            Gomez
    Vice
    President and Secretary
# C_2005281EN.01002701.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/27

---

Action brought on 29 August 2005 — Rath v OHIM

(Case T-326/05)

(2005/C 281/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant(s): Matthias Rath (Cape Town, South Africa) [representative: S. Ziegler, lawyer, C. Kleiner, lawyer and F. Dehn, lawyer]

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation within the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party(ies) to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AstraZeneca AB (Södertälje, Sweden)

Other party(ies) to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Forms of order sought by the claimant(s)

| — | annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation within the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 May 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation within the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 May 2005;

| — | order of costs against OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order of costs against OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: AstraZeneca AB

Applicant for the Community trade mark

Community trade mark affected: The word mark ‘VIXACOR’ in respect of goods in Class 5 (Application No 1 739 697).

Community trade mark affected:

Owner of the opposing mark or sign in the opposition proceedings: the claimant.

Owner of the opposing mark or sign in the opposition proceedings

Opposing mark or sign: The Community mark ‘Vitacor’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 41 (No 689 018), the Community mark ‘Vitacor Plus’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 32 (No 1 668 565) and the German trade mark ‘Vitacor Plus’ for goods in Classes 5, 16 and 31 (No 399 65 690).

Opposing mark or sign

Decision of the Opposition Division: Dismissal of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal

Pleas: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 since there is a likelihood of confusion between the mark applied for and the opposing marks.

Pleas

---
#### Clifford O. LARSON, Appellant, v. Anna HAAG and the Monsanto Company, Appellees.

No. 74-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 25, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 137.69 May a statutorily mandated grant program added to a funding agreement be redesigned?

No, unless it is permitted under the statute authorizing the grant or under the terms and conditions of the grant award, a program added to a funding agreement under a statutorily mandated grant may not be redesigned.
#### Thomas V. WAUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-1234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 4, 1981.

*1239Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and William H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Waugh was given a fifteen-year sentence for violation of Florida’s Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act. Later, he filed a motion to correct his illegal sentence alleging that he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender under section 958.04, Florida Statutes (1979). The trial judge’s response was an order classifying appellant as a youthful offender. Once the judge has classified a party as a youthful offender it is incumbent upon him to sentence the party in accordance with the statute. *State v. Goodson,*403 So.2d 1337 (Fla.1981).

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, his sentence is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in appellant’s presence so that he shall not be sentenced in excess of the maximum allowed under section 958.05, Florida Statutes (1979).

SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
§ 2.21 Relationship to federal statutes protecting research subjects against compulsory disclosure of their identity. ( a ) *Research privilege description.* There may be concurrent coverage of patient identifying information by the regulations in this part and by administrative action taken under section 502(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 872(c) and the implementing regulations at 21 CFR part 1316); or section 301(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 241(d) and the implementing regulations at 42 CFR part 2a). These research privilege statutes confer on the Secretary of Health and Human Services and on the Attorney General, respectively, the power to authorize researchers conducting certain types of research to withhold from all persons not connected with the research the names and other identifying information concerning individuals who are the subjects of the research.
( b ) *Effect of concurrent coverage.* The regulations in this part restrict the use and disclosure of information about patients, while administrative action taken under the research privilege statutes and implementing regulations in paragraph (a) of this section protects a person engaged in applicable research from being compelled to disclose any identifying characteristics of the individuals who are the subjects of that research. The issuance under subpart E of this part of a court order authorizing a disclosure of information about a patient does not affect an exercise of authority under these research privilege statutes.
[82 FR 6115, Jan. 18, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 12623, Feb. 16, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1642]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (filed 06/23/2009) submitted by the Yuma County Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 219, Yuma, Arizona, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation, a non-profit organization, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest.

Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation as the new grantee of Foreign Trade Zone 219, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-21621 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2018

No. 04-18-00548-CV

Thomas Michael TOWNSEND, Sr., TMT Management, LLC, and Townsend Mineral 

Company, LP,

Appellants

v.

Philip Wayne HINDES and Melinda Hindes Eustace,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-09-00179-CVL

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on August 6, 2018. The court reporter’s 

record was thus due on September 5, 2018. On October 30, 2018, the court reporter filed a 

Notification of Late Record stating that she will be unable to file the reporter’s record until 

December 1, 2018. 

The notification of late record is NOTED. We ORDER the reporter’s record to be filed 

no later than December 1, 2018. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# C_2005182EN.01000102.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 2 June 2005

in Case C-394/02: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 93/38/EEC - Public procurement in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors - Contract for the construction of a conveyor-belt system for the thermal-electricity generation plant at Megalopolis - Failure to publish a contract notice - Technical reasons - Unforeseeable event - Extreme urgency)

(2005/C 182/02)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-394/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Nolin and M. Konstantinidis) v Hellenic Republic (Agents: P. Mylonopoulos, D. Tsagkaraki and S. Chala) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 8 November 2002 — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič and E. Levits, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by reason of the award by the public electricity undertaking Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismoy of the contract for the construction of a conveyor-belt system for the thermal-electricity generation plant at Megalopolis by means of a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, as amended by Directive 98/4/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 1998, and, in particular, under Articles 20(1) and 21 thereof; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by reason of the award by the public electricity undertaking Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismoy of the contract for the construction of a conveyor-belt system for the thermal-electricity generation plant at Megalopolis by means of a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, as amended by Directive 98/4/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 1998, and, in particular, under Articles 20(1) and 21 thereof;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.01.2003.

1

---
#### Scott C. STEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 79-1545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1979.

Jerome M. Rosenblum, Hollywood, for petitioner.

Michael J. Satz, State’s Atty., and Teresa Beazley Widmer, Asst. State’s Atty., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In response to our order to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue, the respondent has candidly conceded that the issue involved herein is controlled by the recent decision in *Roberts v. State,*373 So.2d 672 (Fla.1979). We agree.

Accordingly, the petition is granted and the order of the trial court of April 16,1979, is hereby quashed with directions for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.

ANSTEAD, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
### Hydrogeologic framework and geochemistry of ground water and petroleum in the Silurian-Devonian carbonate aquifer, south-central Louisville, Kentucky

By: Charles J. TaylorFrances D. Hostettler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri024123

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama Inc. for the
period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Mitchell D. Staples, Principal Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. Date:March 30, 2005
    By:
    /s/Mitchell D. StaplesMitchell D. StaplesPrinciple financial officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGeopotential research mission, science, engineering and program summaryThis report is based upon the accumulated scientific and engineering studies pertaining to the Geopotential Research Mission (GRM). The scientific need and justification for the measurement of the Earth's gravity and magnetic fields are discussed. Emphasis is placed upon the studies and conclusions of scientific organizations and NASA advisory groups. The engineering design and investigations performed over the last 4 years are described, and a spacecraft design capable of fulfilling all scientific objectives is presented. In addition, critical features of the scientific requirements and state-of-the-art limitations of spacecraft design, mission flight performance, and data processing are discussed.Document ID19860021621Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKeating, T.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Taylor, P.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Kahn, W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Lerch, F.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1986Subject CategoryGeosciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:86240NASA-TM-86240REPT-86B0409Accession Number86N31093Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860021621.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeCuba Internet Task Force...Cuba Internet Task Force – December 6, 2018 Meeting Documents

# 									Cuba Internet Task Force – December 6, 2018 Meeting Documents							

						Download Minutes												[4 MB]

## 								Article Index							

        - Agenda
        - Meeting Minutes

## Agenda