alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3056 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3056

To permit a county-operated health insuring organization to qualify as 
 an organization exempt from certain requirements otherwise applicable 
      to health insuring organizations under the medicaid program 
 notwithstanding that the organization enrolls medicaid beneficiaries 
                      residing in another county.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 1996

  Mr. Riggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit a county-operated health insuring organization to qualify as 
 an organization exempt from certain requirements otherwise applicable 
      to health insuring organizations under the medicaid program 
 notwithstanding that the organization enrolls medicaid beneficiaries 
                      residing in another county.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING COUNTY-OPERATED HEALTH INSURING ORGANIZATIONS TO 
              ENROLL MEDICAID BENEFICIARIES RESIDING IN ANOTHER COUNTY 
              UNDER MEDICAID WAIVER FOR CERTAIN COUNTY-OPERATED HEALTH 
              INSURING ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 9517(c)(3)(B)(ii) of the Consolidated 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. 1396b note), as 
added by section 4734 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, 
is amended by inserting ``or counties'' after ``county''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to quarters beginning on or after October 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1215 Performance and payment adjustment periods for the value-based payment modifier. ( a ) The performance period is calendar year 2013 for value-based payment modifier adjustments made in the calendar year 2015 payment adjustment period.
( b ) The performance period is calendar year 2014 for value-based payment modifier adjustments made in the calendar year 2016 payment adjustment period.
( c ) The performance period is calendar year 2015 for value-based payment modifier adjustments made in the calendar year 2017 payment adjustment period.
( d ) The performance period is calendar year 2016 for value-based payment modifier adjustments made in the calendar year 2018 payment adjustment period.
[77 FR 69368, Nov. 16, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 74820, Dec. 10, 2013; 80 FR 71383, Nov. 16, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of the Company as of December 31, 1997 and the related statement of
operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,352,450
<SECURITIES>                                 8,551,591
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,330,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (77,698)
<INVENTORY>                                    678,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,445,750
<PP&E>                                      12,314,730
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,701,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,667,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,417,079
<BONDS>                                        138,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,075
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,836,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,667,461
<SALES>                                      1,319,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,928,237
<CGS>                                        1,023,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,043,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,521,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (25,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             399,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                734,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            734,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                 191,250
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   925,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21460]



[[Page 46298]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, October 13, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. 
For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 31, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-21460 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2069

MICHAEL FORREST JONES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DALY SEVEN, INC.; JON M. DALY, JR.; NATIONAL LABOR 

RELATIONS BOARD,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:12-cv-00510-WO-JLW)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Forrest Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dena Beth Langley, 

HAGAN DAVIS MANGUM BARRETT & LANGLEY, PLLC, Greensboro, North 

Carolina; Nancy Kessler Platt, Marissa Ann Wagner, NATIONAL 

LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Forrest Jones appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his civil action regarding unfair labor practice 

charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00510-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. 

Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SOUTHERN SAVINGS ASSOCIATION v. LANGFORD LAND COMPANY.

No. 65076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Southern Marigold, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 372 So.2d 713.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANIEL KING

v.

HON. CHARLES B. BURR II, IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

DELAWARE COUNTY

PETITION OF: DANIEL KING AND 

THOMAS P. GANNON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 173 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED. 

The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch 

Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See King 

v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge, 2 MM 2017 (order dated February

28, 2017) (issuing a rule on Petitioners “to show cause why they should not be barred 

from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving 

Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning 

the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gannon, Esquire, from 

representing Daniel King.”). 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
698 A.2d 570

#### In the Matter of Mark BENDET.

No. 326 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 2, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, Mark Bendet having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 6, 1997; the said Mark Bendet having *484been directed on May 6, 1997, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Mark Bendet is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
No. 74-6560.

#### Wheeler *v.*Tennessee.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
----

----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Rajiv Datar                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Rajiv Datar                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | December 16, 2011                                                                                                                                                                       |

----
#### WINCAST ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence J. HICKEY et al., Appellees.

No. 75-735.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1975.

*18Sanford N. Reinhard of Zinn & Rein-hard, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

WALDEN, Judge.

The trial court ordered cross-defendant Wincast Associates, Inc. to post with the Court a $50,000 cash or surety bond in favor of cross-claimant Percy Rosemurgy. We reverse and remand with respectful directions that Wincast Associates, Inc. be discharged from the obligation of filing this bond. The bond was designed to ensure recovery by Rosemurgy should he prevail in his claim that Wincast Associates, Inc., the owner of two rental complexes in Crystal Lake Subdivision, owed him certain recreational fees for facilities provided to Wincast in that subdivision. However, there was no proof of the existence of any extenuating circumstance or of any fund comprising the subject matter of the dispute. Such would be necessary to justify ordering a defendant to deposit money with the Court. In *Brooks v. Galicia Steamship Co., Ltd.,*237 So.2d 582 (3d DCA Fla.1970) the court found similar error:

> “We find no procedure under the law authorizing a common law trial judge to order a deposit in the registry of the court upon an unsworn complaint [prior to answer], no testimony or evidence or other admissions indicating *either the character of the monies ordered to be deposited*or who has possession of them. To this extent, we find the trial judge departed from the essential requirements of the law in directing the deposit into the registry of the court.” (Emphasis supplied.) *Id.*at 583.

Although Rosemurgy claimed that rental payments to Wincast were identifiable funds in dispute, (i. e. the funds from which the recreational payments should be made), this is not acceptable. The recreational payments could be made from any source, and Rosemurgy had no direct claim to the rental payments. In 23 Am.Jur.2d *Deposits in Court,*§ 2 (1965), it is stated:

> “The authority conferred on a court to order a deposit of money or property does not apply if the money in the possession of the party is not the subject of the litigation, but rather its payment is an incident thereto, dependent on the judgment to be rendered in the action, as in the case of an action for redemption, specific performance, accounting, rescission, or the like.” *Id.*at 737.

Rosemurgy is seeking to have certain easements and covenants construed, which, if construed in his favor, would result in a money judgment to him, the payment being incident to the judgment rendered. *See also*15 Fla.Jur., *Funds and Deposits in Court,*§ 1 (1957):

> “While there are various grounds which justify or require a payment into court of a fund of money in dispute; deposits generally either are made by a party who desires to be relieved of the burden of caring for a fund, or are required in order to preserve money during the pen-dency of a litigation.” *Id.*at 87-88.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ„ concur.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.52 Home dialysis services, supplies, and equipment: Scope and conditions. ( a ) Medicare Part B pays for the following services, supplies, and equipment furnished to an ESRD patient in his or her home: ( 1 ) Purchase or rental, installation, and maintenance of all dialysis equipment necessary for home dialysis, and reconditioning of this equipment. Dialysis equipment includes, but is not limited to, artificial kidney and automated peritoneal dialysis machines, and support equipment such as blood pumps, bubble detectors, and other alarm systems.
( 2 ) Items and supplies required for dialysis, including (but not limited to) dialyzers, syringes and needles, forceps, scissors, scales, sphygmomanometer with cuff and stethoscope, alcohol wipes, sterile drapes, and rubber gloves.
( 3 ) Home dialysis support services furnished by an approved ESRD facility, including periodic monitoring of the patient's home adaptation, emergency visits by qualified provider or facility personnel, any of the tests specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of § 410.50, personnel costs associated with the installation and maintenance of dialysis equipment, testing and appropriate treatment of water, and ordering of supplies on an ongoing basis.
( 4 ) On or after July 1, 1991, erythropoeisis-stimulating agents for use at home by a home dialysis patient and, on or after January 1, 1994, by a dialysis patient, if it has been determined, in accordance with § 494.90(a)(4) of this chapter, that the patient is competent to use the drug safely and effectively.
( b ) Home dialysis support services specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this section must be furnished in accordance with a written treatment plan that is prepared and reviewed by a team consisting of the individual's physician and other qualified professionals. (Section 494.90 of this chapter contains details on patient plans of care).
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 43709, Sept. 4, 1991; 59 FR 26959, May 25, 1994; 73 FR 20474, Apr. 15, 2008]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Crimea Is Ukraine

# 									Crimea Is Ukraine							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 25, 2021

The United States joins Ukraine in marking the seventh anniversary of Russia’s invasion and seizure of Crimea — a brazen affront to the modern international order.  We affirm this basic truth: Crimea is Ukraine.

Russia’s occupation and increasing militarization of the Crimean Peninsula have implications far beyond Ukraine’s borders, threatening the world’s common security.  This occupation comes at significant human cost.  Russian occupation authorities have sustained a brutal campaign of repression against Crimean Tatars, ethnic Ukrainians, and members of other minority ethnic and religious groups in Crimea.  Russian occupation authorities have raided mosques and homes, driven independent media off the peninsula, and handed down lengthy prison sentences to those who dare to speak out against the occupation.  Russia’s repression has left Crimean residents in a constant state of fear, unable to live their lives freely.

We call on Russia to immediately end its occupation of Crimea, release all Ukrainian political prisoners it unjustly holds, and return full control of the peninsula to Ukraine.  We likewise call on Russia to end its aggression in eastern Ukraine.  U.S. sanctions on Russia in response to its aggression in eastern Ukraine and seizure of Crimea will remain in place unless and until Russia reverses course.  The United States does not, and will never, recognize Russia’s purported annexation of Crimea.

The United States welcomes Ukraine’s new initiative, the Crimean Platform, and looks forward to continuing to work with Ukraine and our allies and partners to end Russia’s occupation of the Crimean Peninsula and aggression in eastern Ukraine.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonReligious FreedomRussiaThe Secretary of StateUkraine

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 24

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc., does hereby appoint John H. Castle, Kurt G. Miller, and Danice Chartrand, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.

|Dated:  January 26, 2004 |  | /s/ William E. Galliers
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | William E. Galliers    
|                         |  |
HomeTurkey

# Turkey

391 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Akcapar	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 8, 2024Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Istanbul, Türkiye: Istanbul International Community School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 21, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 21, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 5, 2024	  Vedant PatelFebruary 5, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs	  Barbara A. LeafFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 31, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 31, 2024Washington, D.C. 

previous page1234…40next page

Back to Top
# C_2005243EN.01001301.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/13

---

(2005/C 243/21)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 229, 17.9.2005

OJ C 229, 17.9.2005

Past publications

OJ C 217, 3.9.2005

OJ C 205, 20.8.2005

OJ C 193, 6.8.2005

OJ C 182, 23.7.2005

OJ C 171, 9.7.2005

OJ C 155, 25.6.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---