alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hendrik W. VIETOR, Appellant, v. Margaret A. SILL and George M. Crandall, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 74-394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1975.

*565G. H. Martin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Law Offices of James P. O’Flarity, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Agnes Joyce. .

PER CURIAM.

On the occasion of the third appearance of this case no useful purpose will be served by any further recitation of the facts. Suffice it to say that the trial court has apparently failed to fully appreciate the import of our prior decisions.1 Upon examination of the record in this case and consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in not granting plaintiff specific performance and in failing to consider the award of damages. In order to further implement our prior decisions and based upon the facts in the record we are of the opinion that the purported conveyance by defendant Sill to defendant Joyce was null and void and is hereby set aside. Krantz v. Donner, Fla.App. 1973, 285 So.2d 699. The defendant Sill is directed to convey the property in question to the plaintiff in accordance with his prayer for relief and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on the issue of damages in accordance with the theory of plaintiff’s case. Sea Ledge Properties, Inc. v. Dodge, Fla.App. 1973, 283 So.2d 55.2 In all other respects to the extent not inconsistent herewith the final judgment is affirmed.3

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., cor.cur.

1

. Vietor v. Sill, Fla.App.1973, 272 So.2d 173; Victor v. Sill, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 198.

2

. In ascertaining the amount of any damages, computations shall begin on the date notice was received of plaintiff’s agreement to buy the subject property, December 6, 1968 through the date plaintiff received possession of the subject i>roperty. In addition, the defendant Sill shall be entitled to interest on the purchase price accruing from December 6, 1968 through and including the date on which plaintiff deposited the purchase money into the registry of the court.

3

.In particular, the claim for attorney’s fees is disallowed.
# C_2005168EN.01001901.xml

| 8.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 July 2005

(2005/C 168/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1957 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6851 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4287 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5472 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,916 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5734 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,278 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1104 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5904 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,46 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,954 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6241 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6094 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,476 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,294 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7669 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0272 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 254,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1747 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8962 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 717,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5437 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,127 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,438 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,843 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1957

JPY

Japanese yen

133,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6851

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4287

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5472

ISK

Iceland króna

78,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,916

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5734

CZK

Czech koruna

30,278

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1104

RON

Romanian leu

3,5904

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,46

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,954

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6241

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6094

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,476

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,294

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7669

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0272

KRW

South Korean won

1 254,17

ZAR

South African rand

8,1747

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8962

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 717,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5437

PHP

Philippine peso

67,127

RUB

Russian rouble

34,438

THB

Thai baht

49,843

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005229EN.01001501.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 July 2005

in Case T-312/03 Wassen International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier national figurative mark comprising the word element ‘Selenium Spezial A-C-E’ - Application for Community word mark SELENIUM-ACE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 229/29)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-312/03: Wassen International Ltd, established in Leatherhead (United Kingdom), represented by M. Edenborough, Barrister, and S. Mayer, Solicitor, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: S. Laitinen and M. Capostagno), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal being Stroschein Gesundkost GmbH, established in Hamburg (Germany) — ACTION for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2003 (Case R 121/2002-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Wassen International Ltd and Stroschein Gesundkost GmbH, — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264, 1.11.2003.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with German State Secretary Berger

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with German State Secretary Berger							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 17, 2021

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with German State Secretary Miguel Berger today in Washington, D.C.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and State Secretary Berger emphasized the importance of the Transatlantic and the U.S.-German relationship as we cooperate to uphold our democratic values, address the climate crisis, and build back better following the pandemic.  They also discussed the importance of cooperating on a joint approach to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Russia, as well as maintaining our diplomatic presence during an orderly military withdrawal from Afghanistan.  The Deputy Secretary and the State Secretary also reaffirmed their support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russian aggression, while underscoring the need for Ukraine to make continued progress on reforms.  The Deputy Secretary underscored the importance of European energy security, reiterating the United States’ opposition to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateGermanyOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeJordan

# Jordan

210 items

        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Trip to Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan	  January 12, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II	  January 7, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Following Tour of a World Food Program Regional Coordination Warehouse	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 7, 2024Amman, Jordan 
        -    		Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt, January 4-11, 2024	   
        -    Media Note  		Counselor Chollet and Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Israel and Jordan	  January 4, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt	  Matthew MillerJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Deputy Secretary of State Nuland’s Travel to Jordan and Iraq	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Jordanian Foreign Minister Safadi	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting on Gaza with Joint Arab League-Organization of Islamic Cooperation Delegation	  December 9, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Jordan	  November 29, 2023 

previous page123456…21next page

Back to Top
§ 542.512 Noncommercial, personal remittances authorized. ( a ) ( 1 ) U.S. persons are authorized to send and receive, and U.S. depository institutions, U.S. registered brokers or dealers in securities, and U.S. registered money transmitters are authorized to process transfers of, funds to or from Syria or for or on behalf of an individual ordinarily resident in Syria in cases in which the transfer involves a noncommercial, personal remittance, provided the transfer is not by, to, or through the Government of Syria or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201.
( 2 ) Noncommercial, personal remittances do not include charitable donations of funds to or for the benefit of an entity or funds transfers for use in supporting or operating a business, including a family-owned business.
( b ) The transferring institutions identified in paragraph (a) of this section may rely on the originator of a funds transfer with regard to compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, provided that the transferring institution does not know or have reason to know that the funds transfer is not in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) An individual who is a U.S. person is authorized to carry funds as a noncommercial, personal remittance, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, to an individual in Syria or ordinarily resident in Syria, other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201, provided that the individual who is a U.S. person is carrying the funds on his or her behalf, but not on behalf of another person.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.2 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Philip G. Tinkler, as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PHILIP G. TINKLERPHILIP G. TINKLER President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer May 12, 2006
# C_2006067EN.01003502.xml

| 18.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4111 — Goldman Sachs/Daiwa/SMBC/Sanyo)

(2006/C 67/17)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4111. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4111. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRhenium Mechanical Properties and Joining TechnologyIridium-coated rhenium (Ir/Re) provides thermal margin for high performance and long life radiation cooled rockets. Two issues that have arisen in the development of flight Ir/Re engines are the sparsity of rhenium (Re) mechanical property data (particularly at high temperatures) required for engineering design, and the inability to directly electron beam weld Re chambers to C103 nozzle skirts. To address these issues, a Re mechanical property database is being established and techniques for creating Re/C103 transition joints are being investigated. This paper discusses the tensile testing results of powder metallurgy Re samples at temperatures from 1370 to 2090 C. Also discussed is the evaluation of Re/C103 transition pieces joined by both, explosive and diffusion bonding. Finally, the evaluation of full size Re transition pieces, joined by inertia welding, as well as explosive and diffusion bonding, is detailed.Document ID19970009605Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsReed, Brian D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Biaglow, James A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107317AIAA Paper 96-2598NAS 1.15:107317E-10413Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Lake Buena Vista, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 1, 1996End Date: July 3, 1996Sponsors:American Society for Electrical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N15007Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-70-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009605.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2005217EN.01002402.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/24

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-420/04 P: Georgios Gouvras v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Posting - Secondment in the interests of the service - Retrospective change of place of employment and of the financial entitlements relating to it - Recovery of sum not due)

(2005/C 217/47)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-420/04 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged on 29 September 2004 by Georgios Gouvras, an official of the Commission of the European Communities (lawyer: J.-N. Louis), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet and S. von Bahr, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 14 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Gouvras shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Gouvras shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284 of 20.11.2004.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2004, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the accompanyingReport fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date: January 31, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Joseph C. Christenson |                    | /s/ Timothy C. Clayton |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Joseph C. Christenson     | Timothy C. Clayton      |
| President                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Michael R. TuttleMichael R. Tuttle
President & Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2011Date
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3126

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to place the burden of proof

on the Secretary to prove that the cash method of accounting does

not clearly reflect income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 1996

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to place the

burden of proof on the Secretary to prove that the cash

method of accounting does not clearly reflect income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BURDEN OF PROOF ON SECRETARY TO PROVE

4 CASH METHOD OF ACCOUNTING DOES NOT

5 CLEARLY REFLECT INCOME.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 446 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general

8 rule for methods of accounting) is amended by adding at

9 the end the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case of a tax-
2

•HR 3126 IH

1 payer not otherwise precluded under section 447 or 448

2 from using the cash receipts and disbursements method

3 of accounting, in any proceeding involving the issue of

4 whether such method clearly reflects income, the burden

5 of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Sec6 retary.’’

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply to proceedings commenced after

9 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         5052
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         676
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               7600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    10350
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         15428
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           15540
<LOANS>                                        50831
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 92025
<DEPOSITS>                                     81053
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            365
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3532
<OTHER-SE>                                     7058
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 92025
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5832
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1877
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               301
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8023
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2738
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2738
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5284
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  186
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1893
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 9.61
<LOANS-NON>                                    330
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               1131
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                3945
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1219
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  489
<RECOVERIES>                                   166
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1082
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1082
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>