alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. J. D. COWAN, Appellant.

Springfield Court of Appeals,

January 3, 1911.

APPELLATE PRACTICE: Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals: Transfer of Cause: Waiver of Jurisdiction. Where a- cause was appealed from a county within the jurisdiction of the St. Louis Court of Appeals, and transferred from that court to ' the Springfield Court of Appeals, under the Act of 1909, page 396, and no appearance was entered, nor hriefs filed in the latter court, the Springfield Court of Appeals, following the holding of the Supreme Court, will not assume jurisdiction, hut will transfer the cause to the St. Louis Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Wayne Circuit *Court.*— Son. *J. L. Fort,*Judge.

Transferred t.o St. Louis Court of Appeals.

*Abington & Phillips*for appellant.

*J. L.*Meador, *O. L. Hunger*for respondent.

NIXON, P.J.

Two indictments were returned against the appellant in the circuit court of Wayne county, Missouri, the first containing one count, the second containing two counts, each count charging him with, selling intoxicating liquor to designated persons in violation of the Local Option Law alleged to have been in force in Wayne county at the time of the- commission of the alleged offenses. The indictments were consolidated. Defendant, when arraigned, interposed .a motion to quash, claiming that the Local Option Law was in violation of the Constitution of this state and of the United States in various particulars set out. This was overruled and exceptions saved. Upon trial, the accused .was convicted on both counts of the second in*623dictment and his fine assessed at five hundred dollars on each of the two counts, but was acquitted on the first indictment. Among other grounds set up in the motion for a new trial was the action of the court'in overruling the motion to quash. A new trial being denied, the accused perfected an appeal to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. That court transferred the case to the Supreme Court on the ground that the motion to quash raised a constitutional question. [State v. Cowan, 124 S. W. 586.] The Attorney-General filed a motion in the Supreme Court asking that the case be transferred to the St. Louis Court of Appeals on the authority of State v. Campbell, 214 Mo. l. c. 364, 113 S. W. 1081, and the transfer was accordingly ordered. The case was then transferred by the St. Louis Court of Appeals to this court by virtue of the Act of 1909 authorizing the transfer of causes from one court of appeals to another court of appeals in this state; No appearance whatsoever has been made by either party in this court, and as no recognition of this court’s right to hear and determine the cause has come from either side, it becomes our duty to transfer the case to the St. Louis Court of Appeals for reasons stated in a companion case (State v. Cowan, No. 533), decided this day, and it is so ordered.

All concur.
104TH CONGRESS

2T4d Session H. R. 3161

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory

products of Romania.treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3161

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Romania.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—
2

•HR 3161 EH

1 (1) Romania emerged from years of brutal

2 Communist dictatorship in 1989 and approved a

3 new Constitution and elected a Parliament by 1991,

4 laying the foundation for a modern parliamentary

5 democracy charged with guaranteeing fundamental

6 human rights, freedom of expression, and respect for

7 private property;

8 (2) local elections, parliamentary elections, and

9 presidential elections have been held in Romania,

10 and 1996 will mark the second nationwide presi11 dential elections under the new Constitution;

12 (3) Romania has undertaken significant eco13 nomic reforms, including the establishment of a two14 tier banking system, the introduction of a modern

15 tax system, the freeing of most prices and elimi16 nation of most subsidies, the adoption of a tariff17 based trade regime, and the rapid privatization of

18 industry and nearly all agriculture;

19 (4) Romania concluded a bilateral investment

20 treaty with the United States in 1993, and both

21 United States investment in Romania and bilateral

22 trade are increasing rapidly;

23 (5) Romania has received most-favored-nation

24 treatment since 1993, and has been found by the

25 President to be in full compliance with the freedom
3

•HR 3161 EH

1 of emigration requirements under title IV of the

2 Trade Act of 1974;

3 (6) Romania is a member of the World Trade

4 Organization and extension of unconditional most-fa5 vored-nation treatment to the products of Romania

6 would enable the United States to avail itself of all

7 rights under the World Trade Organization with re8 spect to Romania; and

9 (7) Romania has demonstrated a strong desire

10 to build friendly relationships and to cooperate fully

11 with the United States on trade matters.

12 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

13 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO ROMANIA.

14 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN15 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith16 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

17 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

18 (1) determine that such title should no longer

19 apply to Romania; and

20 (2) after making a determination under para21 graph (1), proclaim the extension of nondiscrim22 inatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment)

23 to the products of that country.

24 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

25 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub-
4

•HR 3161 EH

1 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod2 ucts of Romania, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

3 cease to apply to that country.

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 29

To provide that of amounts available to a designated agency for a fiscal

year that are not obligated in the fiscal year, up to 50 percent may

be used to pay bonuses to agency personnel and the remainder shall

be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury and used exclusively

for deficit reduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To provide that of amounts available to a designated agency

for a fiscal year that are not obligated in the fiscal

year, up to 50 percent may be used to pay bonuses

to agency personnel and the remainder shall be deposited

into the general fund of the Treasury and used exclusively for deficit reduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF UNOBLIGATED AMOUNTS FOR BO4 NUSES AND DEFICIT REDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of amounts available to a des6 ignated agency specifically for administrative expenses for
2

•HR 29 IH

1 a fiscal year or a period of fiscal years that are not obli2 gated before the end of the fiscal year or period, respec3 tively—

4 (1) the head of the agency may use up to 50

5 percent to pay bonuses to personnel of the agency;

6 and

7 (2) the remainder shall be deposited in the gen8 eral fund of the Treasury and used exclusively for

9 deficit reduction.

10 (b) APPLICATION.—This subsection shall apply with

11 respect to fiscal years beginning after the date of the en12 actment of this Act.

13 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF AGENCIES.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—An agency shall be a designated

15 agency under section 1 if the agency is designated for that

16 purpose by the Director of the Office of Management and

17 Budget.

18 (b) DESIGNATION OF AGENCIES.—The Director of

19 the Office of Management and Budget—

20 (1) shall designate not more than one agency

21 under this section for the first fiscal year beginning

22 after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

23 (2) may designate such number of agencies

24 under this subsection for fiscal years after that first

25 fiscal year as the Director considers to be appro-
3

•HR 29 IH

1 priate based on the effectiveness of this section in

2 reducing the deficit.

3 SEC. 3. REPORTS.

4 The Director of the Office of Management and Budg5 et shall submit a report to the Congress by not later than

6 December 31 of each year on the implementation of this

7 section in the preceding fiscal year, describing the effec8 tiveness of this section in reducing the deficit.

Æ
#### John ANGES, Appellant, v. Barbara A. Rose ANGES, Appellee.

No. 74-998.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 407.30 Limitations on enrollment. ( a ) *Initial enrollment periods* — ( 1 ) *Individual under age 65.* An individual who has not attained age 65 may have one or more periods of entitlement to hospital insurance, based on disability. Since each period of disability entitlement entitles the individual to hospital insurance and since entitlement to hospital insurance makes the individual eligible for SMI enrollment, an individual may have an SMI initial enrollment period for each continous period of entitlement to hospital insurance.
( 2 ) *Individuals who have attained age 65.* An individual who has attained age 65 may not have more than one initial enrollment period on the basis of age. However, if the individual develops ESRD after age 65, he or she may have another initial enrollment period based on meeting the requirements of § 406.13 of this chapter.
( b ) *Number of enrollments.* There is no limitation on the number of enrollments.
( c ) *Coverage under buy-in agreements.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the continued enrollment of an individual following the end of coverage under a State buy-in agreement in considered an initial enrollment.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray G. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Murray G. Smith                 
|Murray G. Smith                     
|Chief Financial Officer             
|Paulson Capital Corp.
March 10, 2011

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeNorth Macedonia

# North Macedonia

113 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs	  August 5, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: North Macedonia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: North Macedonia	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		North Macedonia’s Decision to Advance its EU Accession Negotiations	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 16, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Support for North Macedonia Opening EU Accession Negotiations	  July 10, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Support for North Macedonia Opening EU Accession Negotiations	  July 9, 2022 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – Ottawa Agreement – Notification of Signature; North Macedonia, June 2, 2022	   
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with North Macedonia’s Foreign Minister Osmani	  June 3, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And North Macedonia Foreign Minister Bujar Osmani Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 2, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S. – North Macedonia Strategic Dialogue	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy...Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy 2  Releases

# Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Releases

97 items

        -    Media Note  		United States-Iceland Economic Partnership Dialogue	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Costa Rica	  April 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Second United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Activities	  March 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Inaugural United States-Czech Republic Cyber Dialogue	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States Releases Guidance for Online Platforms On Protecting Human Rights Defenders Online	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Growing Coalition of Governments Join the U.S. In Countering the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Efforts to Counter the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The Sixth U.S.-France Cyber Dialogue	  March 14, 2024 
        -    		Democratic Roadmap: Building Civic Resilience to the Global Digital Information Manipulation Challenge	   
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy	  March 11, 2024 

123…10next page

Back to Top
#### Joan Mildred SELLEY and Wilbur Webb Selley, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1058.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Peter de Manió, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeCases Filed Against Guatemala...Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala

# 									Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates allege that the Republic of Guatemala violated Articles 10.3 (national treatment), 10.4 (most-favored-nation treatment), 10.5 (minimum standard of treatment), and 10.7 (expropriation) of the CAFTA-DR. This arbitration is proceeding under the ICSID Convention Rules and is administered by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

Find further information and documents concerning this claim.

**2/19/21**U.S. Article 10.20.2 Submission [615 KB]U.S. Article 10.20.2 Submission – Accessible version [1 MB]

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsGuatemalaNorth American Free Trade Agreement

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UK FCDO Permanent Under Secretary Barton

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UK FCDO Permanent Under Secretary Barton							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

December 5, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office Permanent Under Secretary Philip Barton today in London. Deputy Secretary Sherman discussed the United States’ unwavering commitment to assist Ukraine in mitigating the effects of Russia’s war of aggression and continued attacks on critical infrastructure. They also discussed NATO planning and promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3155 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H.R. 3155

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Wekiva 
River, Seminole Creek, and Rock Springs Run in the State of Florida for 
  study and potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers 
                                system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) Wekiva River, Florida.--(A) The entire river.
    ``(B) The Seminole Creek tributary.
    ``(C) The Rock Springs Run tributary.''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT.

    Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) The study of the Wekiva River and the tributaries designated 
in paragraph ( ) of subsection (a) shall be completed and the report 
transmitted to Congress not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this paragraph.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                Assistant to the Clerk.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2980

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to stalking.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1996

Mr. ROYCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

stalking.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Stalking

5 Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. PUNISHMENT OF INTERSTATE STALKING.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting after section 2261 the following:

9 ‘‘§ 2261A. Interstate stalking

10 ‘‘Whoever travels across a State line or enters or

11 leaves Indian country with the intent to injure or harass
2

•HR 2980 IH

1 another person, and in the course of, or as a result of,

2 such travel places that person in reasonable fear of the

3 death of, or serious bodily injury to, that person or a mem4 ber of that person’s immediate family (as defined in sec5 tion 115) shall be punished as provided in section 2261.’’.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

7 (1) Section 2261(b) of title 18, United States

8 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or section 2261A’’

9 after ‘‘this section’’.

10 (2) Sections 2261(b) and 2262(b) of title 18,

11 United States Code, are each amended by striking

12 ‘‘offender’s spouse or intimate partner’’ each place it

13 appears and inserting ‘‘victim’’.

14 (3) The chapter heading for chapter 110A of

15 title 18, United States Code, is amended by insert16 ing ‘‘AND STALKING’’ after ‘‘VIOLENCE’’.

17 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

18 at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States

19 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

20 section 2261 the following new item:

‘‘2261A. Interstate stalking.’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2872

To authorize substitution for drawback purposes of certain types of fibers

and yarns for use in the manufacture of carpets and rugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1996

Mr. DEAL of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To authorize substitution for drawback purposes of certain

types of fibers and yarns for use in the manufacture

of carpets and rugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DRAWBACK FOR CERTAIN YARNS AND FIBERS.

4 Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.

5 1313) is amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(x) CARPET AND RUG PRODUCTS.—Notwithstand7 ing any other provision of law, when used or usable in

8 the manufacture of products classified in heading 5703

9 of the Schedule B Classification of Exports, imported

10 duty-paid merchandise is of the same kind and quality as
2

•HR 2872 IH

1 the duty-paid, duty-free, or domestic merchandise which

2 is substituted in the exported product if—

3 ‘‘(1) the imported duty-paid merchandise is

4 classified under heading 5402, 5404, or 5406 of the

5 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

6 and the material with which it is substituted would

7 also be classified under the same headings, or

8 ‘‘(2) the imported duty-paid merchandise is

9 classified under heading 5501, 5503, 5505, 5506, or

10 5509 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

11 United States and the material with which it is sub12 stituted would also be classified under the same

13 headings.’’.

14 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

15 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re16 spect to—

17 (1) any drawback claim made on or after the

18 30th day after the date of the enactment of this Act;

19 and

20 (2) any drawback entry that, as of the 30th day

21 after such date of enactment, is unliquidated or the

22 liquidation of which is not final or is under protest.

Æ
No. 99-1935.

#### Columbus-America Discovery Group, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to file certain lodgings under seal granted. Motions of National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, National Association of Academies of Science, and National Maritime Historical Society for leave to file briefs as amid curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Darrell H. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                    /s/ Darrell H. Hughes
                                    Darrell H. Hughes
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                    November 14, 2002
```