alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

69–011 2008

110th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 110–144 

CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT OF ONE TWO-INCH FLUID ENERGY MILL FOR THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL POWDERS AND TEN ACCELEROMETERS FOR INCORPORATION INTO RAILWAY GEOMETRY MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE 

LAUNCH INDUSTRY, NOR WILL IT MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE 

MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–261, SEC. 1512 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 28, 2008. 

Hon. NANCY PELOSI, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261), I hereby certify 

that the export to the People’s Republic of China of one two-inch 

fluid energy mill for the research and development of pharmaceutical powders and ten accelerometers for incorporation into railway geometry measurement systems is not detrimental to the 

United States space launch industry, and that the material and 

equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that could be 

derived from such exports, will not measurably improve the missile 

or space launch capabilities of the People’s Republic of China. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with REPORTS
EXHIBIT
32.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

# 18
U.S.C. §1350,

# AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

# SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cognigen Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gary L. Cook, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The
information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results  of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Gary L. Cook
Gary L. Cook
Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February
14, 2006

---
# CA2005297EN.01000101.xml

| 29.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 297/1

---

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10015

(2005/C 297 A/01)

The Community Plant Variety Office is seeking to appoint its President.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The President shall be appointed by the Council from a list of candidates which shall be proposed by the Commission after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the Communities. The Community Plant Variety Office and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application forms and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

or

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

The delay for the receipt of applications is 31 December 2005 (see details in application instructions).

31 December 2005

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Individuals and Entities with Ties to Terrorist Organizations

# 									Designating Individuals and Entities with Ties to Terrorist Organizations							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 27, 2023

Today, the United States is imposing sanctions on eight key individuals for supporting Hamas, as well as Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) officials involved in financing and training Hamas.  A number of the individuals and entities designated today have played key roles in facilitating sanctions evasion by Hamas-affiliated companies.

Additionally, the United States is designating four entities for ties to Specially Designated Global Terrorists, including Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iranian Bonyad Shahid, also known as the Martyrs Foundation.  The Department of State’s Rewards for Justice program is offering millions in rewards for information on certain activities and leaders of Hamas.

The United States is committed to dismantling networks that support funding for Hamas and countering Iran’s support for terrorism in the region and around the world.  We will continue to work with our partners to deny Hamas access to the international financial system as part of our broader effort to prevent and deter its terrorist activity.

**The Department of the Treasury is taking these actions pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended, for having acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly,**for being owned, controlled, or directed by*, or for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to Hamas, PIJ, IRGC, *IRGC-QF,  the Martyrs Foundation,**Al-Ansar Charity Association, or Abdelbasit Hamza Elhassan Mohamed Khair,**persons**designated pursuant to E.O. 13224.  For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s*press release .*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for JusticeSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         169,088
<SECURITIES>                                    82,752
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,350
<INVENTORY>                                    162,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               479,840
<PP&E>                                          49,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     407,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   530,184
<SALES>                                        438,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,755
<CGS>                                          135,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 405.1000 Hearing before an ALJ and decision by an ALJ or attorney adjudicator: General rule. ( a ) If a party is dissatisfied with a QIC's reconsideration, or if the adjudication period specified in § 405.970 for the QIC to complete its reconsideration has elapsed, the party may request a hearing before an ALJ.
( b ) A hearing before an ALJ may be conducted in-person, by video-teleconference (VTC), or by telephone. At the hearing, the parties may submit evidence (subject to the restrictions in § 405.1018 and § 405.1028), examine the evidence used in making the determination under review, and present and/or question witnesses.
( c ) In some circumstances, CMS or its contractor may participate in the proceedings under § 405.1010, or join the hearing before an ALJ as a party under § 405.1012.
( d ) The ALJ or attorney adjudicator conducts a de novo review and issues a decision based on the administrative record, including, for an ALJ, any hearing record.
( e ) If all parties who are due a notice of hearing in accordance with § 405.1020(c) waive their right to appear at the hearing in person or by telephone or video-teleconference, the ALJ or an attorney adjudicator may make a decision based on the evidence that is in the file and any new evidence that is submitted for consideration.
( f ) The ALJ may require the parties to participate in a hearing if it is necessary to decide the case. If the ALJ determines that it is necessary to obtain testimony from a non-party, he or she may hold a hearing to obtain that testimony, even if all of the parties who are entitled to a notice of hearing in accordance with § 405.1020(c) have waived the right to appear. In that event, however, the ALJ will give the parties the opportunity to appear when the testimony is given, but may hold the hearing even if none of the parties decide to appear.
( g ) An ALJ or attorney adjudicator may also issue a decision on the record on his or her own initiative if the evidence in the administrative record supports a fully favorable finding for the appellant, and no other party to the appeal is liable for the claims at issue, unless CMS or a contractor has elected to be a party to the hearing in accordance with § 405.1012.
( h ) If more than one party timely files a request for hearing on the same claim before a decision is made on the first timely filed request, the requests are consolidated into one proceeding and record, and one decision, dismissal, or remand is issued.
[82 FR 5109, Jan. 17, 2017]
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8, Numbers33-39459, 33-61266, 333-00665, 333-48065, 333-39344 and 333-39346 of PPTVISION, Inc. of our report dated December 6, 2002, except as to Note 3 which isas of January 9, 2003, relating to the financial statements which appears inthis Form 10-KSB.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

January 31, 2003

 

----
**Exhibit31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I,      TimothyC. Clayton, certify that:

 

1)     I havereviewed this Form 10-KSB of PPT Vision, Inc.

 

2)     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3)     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4)     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5)     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: January 31, 2005 |                                        |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                        |
|                   | /s/ Timothy C. Clayton                      |   |
|                   | Timothy C. Clayton, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 136.332 Service obligation. The service obligation provided in section 338G(b)(2) of the Public Health Service Act shall be met by the recipient of an Indian Health Scholarship by service in: ( a ) The Indian Health Service.
( b ) An urban Indian organization assisted under Subdivision J-6.
( c ) In private practice of his or her profession if, the practice ( 1 ) is situated in a health manpower shortage area, designated under section 332 of the Public Health Service Act and
( 2 ) addresses the health care needs of a substantial number of Indians as determined by the Secretary in accordance with guidelines of the Service.
[42 FR 59646, Nov. 18, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 1855, Jan. 14, 1985]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         147,196
<SECURITIES>                                   532,947
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,520
<INVENTORY>                                    229,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,047,245
<PP&E>                                       1,472,766
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,051,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,468,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,768
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,202,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,468,019
<SALES>                                        374,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,901
<CGS>                                          243,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  558,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (170,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (170,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (170,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




CFO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, Amanda L.
Engles, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of operations of
      the Corporation.






/s/  Amanda L.
Engles




Amanda L.
Engles


Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer





May 14,
2009
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00027-CR

William Bruce Senn, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CR14-0051)

October 1, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 370.46 Are there any situations in which the Bureau of the Fiscal Service may waive these regulations?

We reserve the right, in our discretion, to waive any provision of these regulations in any case or class of cases. We may do so if such action is not inconsistent with law and will not subject the United States to substantial expense or liability.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Solar Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/s/ Renyi Hou


Renyi Hou


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman


August 19, 2009





/s/ Heung Sang Fong


Heung Sang Fong


Chief Financial Officer


August 19, 2009







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Apollo Solar Energy Inc. and will be retained by Apollo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Comoros National Day

# 									Comoros National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 6, 2023

I extend my heartful congratulations to the Comorian people on the forty-eighth anniversary of your independence.

This has been a watershed year in expanding our relationship with the people of Comoros. We signed a Joint Statement on Cooperation, introduced new avenues for assistance and cooperation, and Comoros hosted the visit of the highest-level U.S. official in its history. I look forward to the next chapter of our partnership as we work together on shared values such as maritime security, strengthening human rights and democratic principles, and increasing commercial ties between our nations.

We wish the best as Comorian people celebrate their independence.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsComorosOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
40818.

#### ALLEN v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of cheating and swindling, and assigns error on the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial.

There was evidence that the defendant sold the witness Dunbar 100 bales of hay and told him that it could be safely stored in a certain barn owned by a third person and Dunbar had it placed there. Dunbar thereafter sold the hay to another buyer. The defendant told another person to whom he owed money that he could take hay from this barn to sell, but did not tell him that some of the hay in the barn was Dunbar’s. This person and'a buyer then took some hay from the barn. The defendant stopped Dunbar’s buyer from taking hay from the barn after he had taken 32 bales, and Dunbar had to make repayment to his buyer. *Held:*

1. The elements necessary for conviction of cheating and swindling *(Code*§ 26-7410) are set out in *Goddard v. State,*2 Ga. App. 154 (2) (58 SE 304). For a learned discussion on this general subject, see Peterson, “Georgia Law of Theft,” 12 Mercer Law Rev. 308-342.

The gist of the offense of cheating and swindling is that false representations, or artful practices, were wilfully, designedly used by the defendant with the intent to defraud. *McElmurray v. State,*76 Ga. App. 604, 608 (47 SE2d 139). This essential element of the crime was not sufficiently shown by the *295evidence in this case. *Ray v. State,*44 Ga. App. 763, 765 (162 SE 861); *Bird v. State,*65 Ga. App. 29 (14 SE2d 611); *Mach v. State,*109 Ga. App. 154 (135 SE2d 467).

Decided September 22, 1964.

*Wyatt & Wyatt, L. M. Wyatt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wilson P. Darden, Solicitor,*contra.

2. The trial judge is required without request to charge the law governing circumstantial evidence when the conviction must rest entirely on circumstantial evidence, but is not required to charge on this subject without request when there is both direct and circumstantial evidence. *Blocker v. State,*185 Ga. 322 (195 SE 207). The trial court did not err in overruling the special ground of the motion for new trial in this case.

The trial court erred in' overruling defendant’s motion for new trial on the general grounds.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*