alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carmen Marimon SENA et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 10, 1974.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Rabin, Sas-son & Ratiner, Miami, for appellants.

Kuvin, Klingensmith & Coon and R. Fred Lewis, Coconut Grove, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and GREEN, ROBERT A., Jr., Associate Judge.

NATHAN, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal an adverse summary final judgment in favor of the defendant.

We find the decisive issue in the case to be whether an insured is entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under his insurance policy, when he has entered into a settlement with, and executes a release in favor of a person who may be liable for the insured’s injuries, in violation of the terms of the policy including the insured’s right of subrogation. Florida cases clearly answer this question in the negative. See Oren v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 581; Phoenix Insurance Company v. Bowen, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 751; American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v. Richardson, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 486.

*244The appellants rely on the case of Kaplan v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 893, to urge the proposition that summary final judgment should not be entered where it is shown that the settlement agreement has not prejudiced the insurer. However, there being no indication in the record that the issue of prejudice was brought before the trial court, this court is now unable to entertain the matter for the first time on appeal. Alliance For Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 51, 65.

Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 582.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures, and other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
# C_2005182EN.01002002.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/20

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 7 April 2005

in Case C-160/04 P Gustaaf Van Dyck v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Lists for promotion - Act adversely affecting an official - Preparatory acts)

(2005/C 182/38)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-160/04 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged at the Court on 19 March 2004 by Gustaaf Van Dyck, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Wuustwezel (Belgium) (lawyer: A. Bywater, assisted by W. Mertens), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and A. Weimar) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, A. Ó Caoimh and U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 7 April 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Gustaaf Van Dyck

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Mr Van Dyck shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Van Dyck shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
#### § 562.310 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
HomeSaint Kitts and Nevis

# Saint Kitts and Nevis

51 items

        -    TIAS  		Saint Kitts and Nevis (87-609) – Defense Agreement concerning Status of Forces	  June 9, 1987 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
No. 00-5858.

#### Rondon-Trinidad *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
H. R. 3021

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To guarantee the continuing full investment of Social Security and other Federal

funds in obligations of the United States.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED

STATES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any other authority provided

by law, the Secretary of the Treasury may issue to each Federal

fund obligations of the United States under chapter 31 of title

31, United States Code, before March 30, 1996, in an amount

not to exceed the sum of—

(1) the amounts deposited in such fund on or after the

earlier of—

(A) the date on which such Secretary would not otherwise be able to issue such obligations to such fund, or

(B) March 15, 1996,

and before March 30, 1996, and

(2) the face amount of obligations held by such fund which

mature during such period.

(b) OBLIGATIONS EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Obligations issued under subsection (a)

shall not be taken into account in applying the limitation

in section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code.

(2) TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall cease

to apply on the earlier of—

(A) the date of the enactment of the first increase

in the limitation in section 3101(b) of title 31, United

States Code, after the date of the enactment of this Act,

or

(B) March 30, 1996.

(c) FEDERAL FUND.—For purposes of this section, the term

‘‘Federal fund’’ means any Federal trust fund or Government

account established pursuant to Federal law to which the Secretary

of the Treasury has issued or is expressly authorized by law directly

to issue obligations under chapter 31 of title 31, United States

Code, in respect of public money, money otherwise required to

be deposited in the Treasury, or amounts appropriated.
H. R. 3021—2

(d) EXTENSION OF EXISTING AUTHORITY.—Subparagraph (B) of

section 1(c)(2) of Public Law 104–103 is amended by striking ‘‘March

15, 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘March 30, 1996’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT  31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Brian  Bonar,  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial
Officer  of  Dalrada  Financial  Corporation,  certify  that:
1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dalrada Financial
Corporation;
2.     Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state a material fact necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by this report;
3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;
4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the small business
issuer  and  have:
a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer,
including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those  entities,  particularly  during  the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)     evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the small business issuer's disclosure
controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report;  and

c)     disclosed  in  this  report  any  changes  in the small business issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is  reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting;  and
5.     I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over  financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee  of  small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the  equivalent  functions):
a)     all  significant  deficiencies  and  material weaknesses in the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  small  business  issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and
b)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or other
employees  who  have  a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting.

Date:  May  19,  2004

/s/  Brian  Bonar
-----------------
Brian  Bonar
Chairman,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
§ 1003.410 Amount of penalties and assessments for Contracting Organization. ( a ) *Penalties.* ( 1 ) The OIG may impose a penalty of up to $25,000 for each individual violation under § 1001.400, except as provided in this section.
( 2 ) The OIG may impose a penalty of up to $100,000 for each individual violation under § 1003.400(a)(3), (a)(5), or (e).
( b ) *Additional penalties.* In addition to the penalties described in paragraph (a) of this section, the OIG may impose— ( 1 ) An additional penalty equal to double the amount of excess premium charged by the contracting organization for each individual violation of § 1003.400(a)(2). The excess premium amount will be deducted from the penalty and returned to the enrollee.
( 2 ) An additional $15,000 penalty for each individual expelled or not enrolled in violation of § 1003.400(a)(3) or (e).
( c ) *Assessments.* The OIG may impose an assessment against a contracting organization with a contract under section 1857 or 1860D-12 of the Act (Medicare Advantage or Part D) of not more than the amount claimed in violation of § 1003.400(a)(4) or (a)(5) on the basis of the misrepresentation or falsified information involved.
( d ) The OIG may impose a penalty or, when applicable, an assessment, against a contracting organization with a contract under section 1857 or 1860D-12 of the Act (Medicare Advantage or Part D) if any of its employees, agents, or contracting providers or suppliers engages in any of the conduct described in § 1003.400(a) through (d).
[81 FR 88357, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42841, July 3, 2023]
Exhibit 10.227

LOGO

December 17, 2007

Via email: dennisryll@yahoo.com and

nevada2595@yahoo.com

Dennis L. Ryll, M.D.

1029 Speckledwood
Manor Court

Chesterfield, MO 63017



|RE: | Biovest International, Inc.  $46,015.10 Loan [Pulaski Interest]
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dennis:

As you know Biovests Unsecured Promissory Note to your order dated
October 1, 2007 in the principal amount of $46,015.10 (the Note) matured on November 30, 2007. Biovest wishes to request your indulgence and consent to extend the maturity date of the Note from November 30, 2007 to
May 31, 2008.

If you are in agreement with this extension of the maturity date, please so indicate by signing where indicated below
and return to us as soon as possible.

If you have any questions, please call. Thank you.



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                                                   
|                                                                             
|/s/ James A. McNulty                                                         
|James A. McNulty, CPA Tel: 813-864-2554 ext. 262 Email: jamcnulty@biovest.com

EXTENSION OF UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

The undersigned hereby extends the maturity of the Unsecured Promissory Note dated October 1, 2007 to May 31, 2008 at which time the Unsecured Promissory Note shall be due and payable
in full in one installment.



|                     |  |        |  |         
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------
|                     |  |        |  |         
|                     |  |       
|/s/ Dennis L. Ryll   |  | Dated: |  | 12-18-07
|Dennis L. Ryll, M.D. |  |        |  |         



324 S Hyde Park Avenue Suite
350 Tampa, Florida 33606

www.biovest.com t: 813 864 2554 f: 813 258 1621
#### Billie V. BUSH v. Cecil Harris JONES, Executor of Estate of Anita Webb Brown, Deceased.

No. 52048.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 20, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1980.

Billie V. Bush, pro se.

Thelma S. Zinner, Biloxi, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jackson County; Robert H. Oswald, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 137.321 How do Indian Tribes and the Secretary identify and request funds for needed construction projects?

In addition to the requirements contained in section 513 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-12], Indian Tribes and the Secretary are encouraged to jointly identify health facility and sanitation needs at the earliest possible date for IHS budget formulation. In developing budget justifications for specific projects to be proposed to Congress, the Secretary shall follow the preferences of the affected Indian Tribe(s) to the greatest extent feasible concerning the size, location, type, and other characteristics of the project.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors
Broad National Bancorporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement No. 33-28183 on Form S-8 of Broad National
Bancorporation of our report dated January 15, 1997, relating
to the consolidated statements of condition of Broad National
Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Broad National Bancorporation.

Our report refers to a change in accounting for certain
investments in debt and equity securities in 1994.


                              /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                              KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Short Hills, New Jersey
March 26, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0565]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the Division Level” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,                         *Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov*, 301-796-3792.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of April 28, 2009 (74 FR 19225), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0396. The approval expires on August 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: August 21, 2009.

David Horowitz,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20895 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
§ 124.605 Reporting and record maintenance requirements. ( a ) *Reporting requirements* — ( 1 ) *Timing of reports.* ( i ) A facility shall submit to the Secretary a report to assist the Secretary in determining compliance with this subpart once every three fiscal years, on a schedule to be prescribed by the Secretary. The report required by this section shall be submitted not later than 90 days after the end of the fiscal year, unless a longer period is approved by the Secretary for good cause shown.
( ii ) A facility shall also submit the required report whenever the Secretary determines, and so notifies the facility in writing, that a report is needed for proper administration of the program. In this situation the facility shall submit the report specified in this section for the filing of reports, within 90 days after receiving notice from the Secretary, or within 90 days after the close of the fiscal year, whichever is later.
( 2 ) *Content of report.* The report must be submitted on a form prescribed by the Secretary and must include information that the Secretary prescribes to permit a determination of whether a facility has met its obligations under this subpart.
( 3 ) The facility shall provide a copy of any report to the HSA for the area when submitting it to the Secretary.
( 4 ) *Institution of suit.* Not later than 10 days after being served with a summons or complaint, the applicant shall notify the Regional Health Administrator for the Region of HHS in which it is located of any legal action brought against it alleging that it has failed to comply with the requirements of this subpart.[1]
( b ) *Record maintenance requirements.* ( 1 ) A facility shall maintain, make available for public inspection consistent with personal privacy, and provide to the Secretary on request, any records necessary to document its compliance requirements of this subpart in any fiscal year, including documents from which information required to be reported under paragraph (a) of this section was obtained. A facility shall maintain these records until 180 days following the close of the Secretary's investigation under § 124.606(a).
Footnotes -
124.605
[1] The addresses of the Regional Office of HHS are set out in 45 CFR 5.31.
§ 583.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 583.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 583.407 :
*See also* § 583.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
#### Johnnie JONES v. John C. SKANNAL.

No. 64530.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

In re Johnnie Jones applying for writ of certiorari, Second Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of Bossier. 368 So.2d 774.

Writ denied; the result is correct.
# South Africa

178 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: South Africa	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with South African Minister Pandor	  May 12, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 11, 2023	  Vedant PatelMay 11, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Cormier Smith’s Travel to Johannesburg, Pretoria, and Durban	  May 8, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to South Africa and Egypt	  May 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Todd D. Robinson Travels to Johannesburg and Pretoria, South Africa, and Accra, Ghana	  May 4, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		South African Freedom Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 25, 2023	  Vedant PatelApril 25, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Sison’s Travel to Madagascar, South Africa, Mauritius, Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Laos	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: South Africa	  March 20, 2023 

previous page1…34567…18next page

Back to Top