alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I,
Andrew I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

June 14, 2006
#### § 802.238 United States.

The term *United States* or *U.S.* means the United States of America, the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, dependency, or possession of the United States, or any subdivision of the foregoing, and includes the territorial sea of the United States. For purposes of these regulations and their examples in this part, an entity organized under the laws of the United States of America, one of the States, the District of Columbia, or a commonwealth, territory, dependency, or possession of the United States is an entity organized “in the United States.”
#### § 11.8 In what format must clinical trial information be submitted?

Information submitted under this part must be submitted electronically to ClinicalTrials.gov, in the format specified at *https://prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov.*
# C_2005287EN.01000502.xml

| 18.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3932 — ThyssenKrupp/Hellenic Shipyards)

(2005/C 287/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3932. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3932. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 402.308 Waivers of exclusions. ( a ) *Basis.* Section 1128(c)(3)(B) of the Act specifies that in the case of an exclusion from participation in the Medicare program based upon section 1128(a)(1), (a)(3), or (a)(4) of the Act, the individual may request that CMS present, on his or her behalf, a request to the OIG for a waiver of the exclusion.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: *Excluded person* has the same meaning as a “person” as defined in § 402.3 who meets for the purposes of this subpart, the definition of the term “exclusion” in § 402.3.
*Hardship* for purposes of this section means something that negatively affects Medicare beneficiaries and results from the imposition of an exclusion because the excluded person is the sole community physician or sole source of essential specialized services in the Medicare community.
*Sole community physician* has the same meaning as that term is defined § 1001.2 of this title.
*Sole source of essential specialized services in the community* has the same meaning as that term defined by the § 1001.2 of this title.
( c ) *General rule.* If CMS determines that a hardship as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section results from exclusion of an affected person from the Medicare program, CMS may consider and may make a request to the Inspector General for waiver of the Medicare exclusion.
( d ) *Submission and content of a waiver of exclusion request.* An excluded person must submit a request for waiver of exclusion in writing to CMS that includes the following: ( 1 ) A copy of the exclusion notice from the OIG.
( 2 ) A statement requesting that CMS present a waiver of exclusion request to the OIG on his or her behalf.
( 3 ) A statement that he or she is the sole community physician or sole source of essential specialized services in the community.
( 4 ) Documentation to support the statement in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
( e ) *Processing of waiver of exclusion requests.* CMS processes a request for a waiver of exclusion as follows: ( 1 ) Notifies the submitter that the waiver of exclusion request has been received.
( 2 ) Reviews and validates all submitted documents.
( 3 ) During its analysis, CMS may require additional, specific information, and authorization to obtain information from private health insurers, peer review organizations (including, but not limited to, Quality Improvement Organizations), and others as necessary to determine validity.
( 4 ) Makes a determination regarding whether or not to submit the waiver of exclusion request to the OIG based on review and validation of the submitted documents.
( 5 ) If CMS elects to submit the waiver of exclusion request to the OIG, CMS copies the excluded person on the request.
( 6 ) If CMS denies the request, then CMS notifies the excluded person of the decision and specifies the reason(s) for the decision.
( f ) *Administrative or judicial review.* A determination rendered under paragraph (e)(4) of this section is not subject to administrative or judicial review.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Lee, sole director and officer of Viropro, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on 10KSB/A of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 18, 2004



/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________



Richard Lee

Richard Lee, Sole Director and Officer

(acts as chief executive officer and principal accounting officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20822]

[[Page 44382]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY-957400-09-L14200000-BJ0000]

Notice of Stays of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming and 
Nebraska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Stays of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming and 
Nebraska

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has placed stays on the 
filing of plats of survey of the following described lands, pending 
consideration of the protest and/or appeal that was filed within 30 
calendar days of publication in this Federal Register. A plat will not 
be officially filed until after disposition of protest and/or appeal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Land Management and is necessary for the management of 
these lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the south boundary and subdivisional lines, and the 
subdivision of section 33, Township 34 North, Range 110 West, of the 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 726, was accepted July 9, 
2009.
    This survey was executed at the request of the National Park 
Service and is necessary for the management of these lands. The lands 
surveyed are:
    The plat representing the entire record of the survey of Tract No. 
37, Township 32 North, Range 3 East, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, 
Nebraska, Group No. 147, was accepted March 6, 2009.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: August 24, 2009.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. E9-20822 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> Date: 7/20/2010 10:49 AM Subject: Re: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) Attachments: pic24241.jpg; Keystone ICR Extension Request (2).doc

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy's, Keystone Generating Station. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 or Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Versions 3 or 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving these questionnaires remains 90 days after receipt. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic24241.jpg)

From: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Jacklin, Mark J" <mjacklin@rrienergy.com>, "Berkebile, Rodney J" <rberkebile@rrienergy.com>

Date: 06/24/2010 11:59 AM Subject: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2)

Dear Ms. Alicea: Please see the attached Keystone ICR Extension Request. Thank you,

James Lafontaine General Manager Keystone Generating Station724-354-5450(See attached file: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2).doc)
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003, by NTS-Properties III and to which
this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-
Properties III.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties III and will be retained by NTS-Properties III and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/ Brian F. Lavin                           
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|President of NTS Capital Corporation,        
|General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates,
|General Partner of NTS-Properties III
Exhibit 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James McNulty, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Biovest International, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.



c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: October 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: /s/ James McNulty                
|                        |  |  |  | James McNulty Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles H. Druckenmiller, Appellant, *against*Bernard J. Shoninger *et*al., Respondents.

(Decided February 3d, 1890.)

After removal to this court of an action brought in a district court, the plaintiff is limited in the amount of -his recovery by the special jurisdiction of othe district court; a complaint demanding a greater sum is bad on demurrer.

Appeal from an order of this court overruling a demurrer to an answer.

The action was begun in the District Court in the City of New York for the Fourth Judicial District, by summons, to recover $250, and was removed to this court on defendants’ application. The complaint subsequently served demanded judgment for $700. Defendants answered denying the juris*478diction of the court. Plaintiff demurred to the answer, and the demurrer was overruled. From the order overruling his demurrer, plaintiff appealed.

*John*Fennel, for appellant.

*John B.*Green, for respondents.

Larremore, Ch. J.

The order made by Judge Allen overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the first defense pleaded in the answer must be affirmed, on the authority of *Smith*v. *White*(23 N. Y. 572) ; *Salter*v. *Parkhurst*(2 Daly 240); *Longrill*v. *Downey*(7 N. Y. Supp. 503).

These cases were evidently considered by Judge Allen when he made such order, and they undoubtedly established the .principle that, when an action is originally brought in a district court, its permanent character must be determined by the declaration and the amount sued for in such court, though subsequently it be removed to this court.

It might be said that no meritorious objection could be made to plaintiffs serving a written complaint, after removal to this court, demanding damages for a sum in excess of the amount the district courts could entertain jurisdiction for. But such practice would unsettle all orderly methods of procedure. If a plaintiff has a claim in excess of the amount the statute allows to be sued for in a district court, he may, of course, bring his action in the first instance in á court of record. But, if he elect to sue in a district court, he must be limited as to the amount of his recovery by the special jurisdiction conferred upon such court. The action is in all essential respects the same after removal as before.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Bischoff, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs.
§ 38.2 Definitions. All terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as given them in the Act. As used in this part: ( a ) *Act* means the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5121, *et seq.*).
( b ) *Administrator* means the Administrator, Federal Disaster Assistance Administration (FDAA), Department of Housing and Urban Development, and any other person to whom he delegates the authority.
( c ) *Contractor* means any public agency or private mental health organization which, pursuant to this part, contracts with the Secretary to provide professional mental health crisis counseling services or to provide mental health training for disaster workers.
( d ) *Crisis* means the existence of any life situation resulting from a major disaster or its aftermath which so effects the emotional and mental equilibrium of a disaster victim that professional mental health counseling services should be provided to help preclude possible damaging physical or psychological effects.
( e ) *Disaster workers* means mental health specialists such as psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, social workers, or qualified agents thereof.
( f ) *Federal Coordinating Officer* means the person appointed by the Administrator to coordinate Federal assistance in a major disaster.
( g ) *Governor* means the chief executive of a State.
( h ) *Grantee* means any public agency or private nonprofit mental health organization which, pursuant to this part, is awarded a grant for the purpose of providing professional mental health crisis counseling services or mental health training for disaster workers.
( i ) *Major disaster* means any hurricane, tornado, storm, flood, high-water, wind-driven water, tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, mudslide, snowstorm, drought, fire, explosion, or other catastrophe in any part of the United States which, in the determination of the President, causes damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant major disaster assistance under the Act above and beyond emergency services by the Federal Government, to supplement the efforts and available resources of the States, local governments, and disaster relief organizations, in alleviating the damage, loss, hardship, or suffering caused thereby.
( j ) *Regional Director* means a director of a regional office of the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration (FDAA).
( k ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health and Human Services to whom the authority involved has been delegated.
( l ) *State* means any of the fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Canal Zone, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
( m ) *State Coordinating Officer* means the person appointed by the Governor to act in cooperation with the appointed Federal Coordinating Officer.
( n ) *Training* means the specific instruction which may be required to enable disaster workers to provide professional mental health crisis counseling to victims of a major disaster or its aftermath.
#### William GRAND and Molly Grand, his wife, Appellants, v. B. KATZ and Luba Katz, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 24, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2005316EN.01000101.xml

| 13.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 December 2005

(2005/C 316/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1925 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4487 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4405 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5413 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,32 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9775 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5733 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,090 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8387 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6438 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,020 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6118 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5831 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3747 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2469 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6836 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0053 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 232,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5615 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6318 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3933 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 631,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,503 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,936 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2870 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,177 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1925

JPY

Japanese yen

143,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4487

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4405

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5413

ISK

Iceland króna

75,32

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9775

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5733

CZK

Czech koruna

29,090

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8387

RON

Romanian leu

3,6438

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,020

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6118

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5831

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3747

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2469

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6836

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0053

KRW

South Korean won

1 232,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,5615

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6318

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3933

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 631,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,503

PHP

Philippine peso

63,936

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2870

THB

Thai baht

49,177

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---