alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership (the General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice President  Finance and Treasurer of the General Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITT President and Chief Executive Officer May 13, 2005




/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLER Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer May 13, 2005
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Davis, Timmy T – State of Qatar – March 2022

# 									Davis, Timmy T – State of Qatar – March 2022							

Certificate of Competency

April 15, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: State of Qatar

CANDIDATE: Timmy T. Davis

Timmy T. Davis, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Counselor, most recently served as the Executive Assistant to the Secretary of State. Prior to that, Davis served as the U.S. Consul General for Basrah and Southern Iraq. His overseas tours include Guatemala City, Guatemala; Najaf, Iraq; Canberra, Australia; and Bogota, Colombia. His domestic assignments include Senior Watch Officer in the State Department Operations Center, Special Assistant to the Secretary of State, Director for Iraq at the National Security Council, Deputy Chief of Staff to the Special Presidential Envoy to Counter-ISIL, Senior Advisor to the Counselor of the Department, Chief of Staff to the Undersecretary for Political Affairs and Acting Chief of Staff of the Department of State. Davis, who holds a Distinguished Honor Award and multiple Superior and Meritorious Honor awards, is also the recipient of the Department’s Ryan C. Crocker Award for Outstanding Leadership in Expeditionary Diplomacy and the American Foreign Service Association’s William R. Rivkin Award for Constructive Dissent. Davis’s deep and substantive background in Near Eastern Affairs, coupled with his demonstrated ability to lead interagency teams in difficult environments, makes him a well-qualified candidate for Ambassador to the State of Qatar.

A native of Virginia, Davis attended the University of Alabama. He served in the United States Marine Corps for nearly a decade including operations in the Horn of Africa and Iraq before joining the Foreign Service. Davis speaks Spanish and Arabic.

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma’s Visit to Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Angola

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma’s Visit to Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Angola							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 19, 2024

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma will travel to Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Angola April 21-25.

In Cameroon, Deputy Secretary Verma will meet with senior Cameroonian government officials, public health partners, and civil society leaders to discuss U.S.-Cameroon cooperation in the areas of health, peace and regional security, and sustainable economic growth.  In Ethiopia, he will meet with African Union Commission officials.  In Angola, Deputy Secretary Verma will travel with Administrator Samantha Power of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to meet with senior Angolan government officials, business and community leaders, farmers, and public health partners.

Tags

AngolaBureau of African AffairsCameroonCivil SocietyDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesEconomic AffairsEthiopiaHealth CareOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceSecurityTravelU.S. Agency for International Development

Back to Top
§ 412.262 Disqualification of an MGCRB member. ( a ) *Grounds for disqualification.* An MGCRB member may not participate in any decision in a case in which he or she may be prejudiced or partial with respect to a party or has any other interest in the case.
( b ) *Request for disqualification.* If a party believes that an MGCRB member should not participate in a decision, the party submits the objection in writing to the MGCRB at its earliest opportunity, explaining the grounds for the request. CMS may also submit such a suggestion to the MGCRB.
( c ) *Consideration by the MGCRB member.* The MGCRB member will consider the objection and, at his or her discretion, either will proceed or withdraw.
( d ) *Consideration by the MGCRB* If the member does not withdraw, a party may petition the MGCRB for withdrawal and the MGCRB will consider the objection and rule on whether the member may participate in the decision before it decides the case.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Italian Ambassador Zappia

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Italian Ambassador Zappia									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 16, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with Italian Ambassador Mariangela Zappia and thanked her for Italy’s leadership of the G7 and contributions to Ukraine’s security. They reviewed G7 priorities and challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China, including the PRC’s support for Russia’s defense industrial base. They reaffirmed strong support for Ukraine’s fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateItalyOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### David Loeser, complainant, *v.*Abe Wosnitzer, defendant.

[Decided January 13th, 1930.]

*461
      *Messrs.*Stein, *McGlynn & Mannoch,*for the complainant.

*Mr. Benjamin M. Weinberg,*.for the defendant.

Backes, V. C.

The complainant and defendant are next door neighbors on the west side of Wyoming avenue, South Orange, and between their houses lies a strip of land fronting forty feet on the avenue by one hundred and fifty-eight feet in depth which each claims. The complainant’s property is to the north of the strip. The defendant built an enclosing fence along the northerly line of the strip and used the strip as his own. The complainant tore down the fence and brought an action in trespass and recovered six cents damages. In the law action the defendant counter-claimed and set up ownership to the strip and charged trespass by the complainant in tearing down the fence. After recovering, the defendant renewed the trespass in right of ownership, and the complainant filed this bill to restrain further interference with the enjoyment of the strip as part of his homestead. The defendant objects that the court has not jurisdiction because the trespasses are not irreparable and that the question of title is for the law courts and is unsettled, notwithstanding the judgment at law.

If the right of possession is in the complainant, repeated actions at law, for intermittent but threatened continuing trespasses, though trifling in damage, would obviously afford an inadequate remedy. Equity will take jurisdiction to avoid multiplicity of suits and to stop the annoyance and nuisance.

The judgment at law settled the right to the strip in the complainant. The defendant’s argument is that it adjudges only that the fence was unlawfully put on the complainant’s *462land, and that it simply settled the ownership of the land upon which the fence stood. The record, so far as it has been introduced, discloses, and counsel concedes it to be the fact, that the issue presented and tried was the ownership of the forty-foot strip. The location of the fence was but an incident in the litigation, demarking the area of the strip in dispute. The judgment of defendant’s guilt was not limited to the unlawful erection of the fence but extended to trespassing upon all the lot which the fence enclosed. The defendant has had his day in court and lost. He is bound by the verdict and he will be enjoined.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAVERICK RESTAURANT CORPORATION FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-1997
<CASH>                                         404,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    164,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               658,865
<PP&E>                                       6,072,136
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,290,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,458,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,576,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,487
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,522,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,458,554
<SALES>                                      3,902,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,902,648
<CGS>                                        1,425,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,222,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (184,398)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (184,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
HomeEgypt

# Egypt

274 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Minister Shoukry of Egypt	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 9, 2023	  Vedant PatelNovember 9, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to France, Egypt, and Spain	  November 8, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Cairo, Egypt: Cairo American College: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 30, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 26, 2023WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to the Middle East	  October 25, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Foreign Ministers from the Middle East	  October 24, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 23, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		United States Participation at the Cairo Peace Summit	  October 22, 2023 

previous page1…34567…28next page

Back to Top
40489.

#### ALLEN v. FULTON NATIONAL BANK.

Decided February 4, 1964.

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff (defendant in error in this court) brought a petition against Herbert Epstein for foreclosure of an automobile under a bill of sale to secure debt, and the marshal levied on the property. Eddy Allen (plaintiff in error) filed a claim asserting ownership of the automobile. After hearing, the trial court denied the claim. The claimant made a motion for new trial on the general and special grounds, and assigns error on the judgment of the trial court overruling this motion. *Held:*

1. The special grounds of the claimant’s motion for new trial complain that the court refused to dismiss the petition for foreclosure on motion made by the claimant, on the grounds (1) that the petition did not show the plaintiff had a right to foreclose; (2) that the plaintiff and the defendant were estopped, because of facts stated in claimant’s motion, to deny claimant’s title to the automobile; and (3) that a trover action, between the defendant in this foreclosure and the claimant, involving the title to the same automobile, was pending on appeal, *Epstein v. Allen,*107 Ga. App. 578 (130 SE2d 811) when the foreclosure action was brought. Neither an exception to a ruling on a motion to dismiss nor an exception to a ruling on the pleadings, is a proper ground of a motion for new trial. *Bennett v. Patten,*148 Ga. 66, 67 (95 SE 690); *Ray v. Wood,*93 Ga. App. 763, 764 (92 SE2d 820); *Sharp v. Michael,*100 Ga. App. 212, 215 (110 SE2d 679); *Padgett v. Reaves,*86 Ga. App. 137 (70 SE2d 922); *Guest v. Baldwin,*104 Ga. App. 809, 811 (123 SE2d 194). The trial court did not err in overruling the special grounds.

2. The evidence on the issue whether the automobile was subject to the levy, though in conflict, supported the verdict denying the claim. Therefore, the trial court did not err in overruling the general grounds of the motion for new trial. *Williamson v. Harry L. Winter, Inc.,*156 Ga. 779 (120 SE 602); *Chaffin v. Community Loan &c. Co.,*67 Ga. App. 410 (20 SE2d 435); *Lundin v. Kuniansky,*107 Ga. App. 774, 775 (131 SE2d 219).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.*

*91*Kanes, Benator •& Lambros, Nick G. Lambros,*for plaintiff in error.

*Edenfield, Reyman •&, Sizemore, Robert E. Hicks,*contra.
EXHIBIT 32.2













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO






18 U.S.C. §1350,






AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert K. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:






1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated: May 15, 2010                                            /s/  Robert K. Bench


Robert K. Bench


Chief Financial Officer











This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 401.116 Availability of records upon request. ( a ) *General.* In addition to the records made available pursuant to §§ 401.106, 401.108, 401.110 and 401.112, CMS will, upon request made in accordance with this subpart, make identified records available to any person, unless they are exempt from disclosure under the provisions of section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code (see § 401.126), or any other provision of law.
( b ) *Misappropriation, alteration, or destruction of records.* No person may remove any record made available to him for inspection or copying under this part, from the place where it is made available. In addition, no person may steal, alter, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy in whole or in part, such a record. See sections 641 and 2071 of title 18 of the United States Code.
# Israel

906 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 25, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 25, 2024WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 24, 2024	  Vedant PatelApril 24, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 23, 2024	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior Bureau Official for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Ambassador Robert Gilchrist on the 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices	  Robert S. GilchristApril 22, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 22, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Israel, West Bank and Gaza	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Israel, West Bank and Gaza	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Minister Gantz 	  April 21, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant	  April 21, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Solo Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 19, 2024Pollio Media Center TheatreCapri, Italy 

previous page1…45678…91next page

Back to Top
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Charles W. F. Dare to Charles A. Fuller for the Benefit of Creditors.

(Decided June 1st, 1885).

The fact that actions are pending in another court against an assignor and assignee under a genera] assignment for benefit of creditors, to set aside the assignment, is not a bar to a proceeding in this court to compel the assignee to account; nor does it present a reasonable excuse for delaying the account.

Appeal from an order of this court requiring an assignee for benefit of creditors to make and file his account.

*P. & D.*Mitchell, for the assignee, appellant.

*E. L. Bushe,*for the North River Bank, a creditor, respondent.

Allen, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Special Term requiring Fuller, as assignee of Dare, to make and file his account.

Dare made a general assignment to Fuller, September 25th, 1883. More than a year having elapsed, the North River Bank, a creditor, filed a petition for a citation to the assignee, and on February 24th, 1885, a citation was issued requiring him to show cause why he should not make and file an account. On the return of the citation the order appealed from was made.

It is contended on the part of the assignee that he ought not to be compelled at this time to proceed to an accounting for the reason that two suits are pending against him and his assignor in other courts to set aside the assignment.

Where proceedings have been taken in another court, having jurisdiction, to compel an assignee for the benefit of creditors to execute his trust and distribute the funds in his hands, this court will make no order for that purpose *(Mat*
      *221
      *ter of Cromien,*10 Daly 41). But the suits above referred to are plainly not such proceedings. The purpose of this statute "which provides for an accounting, cannot be effected in these actions, and any judgments which may be rendered in them will bind no one save the parties to them.

The pendency of these actions therefore constitutes no bar to the accounting by the assignee in this court; nor does it present a reasonable excuse for delaying the account.

More than a year and a half has elapsed since the filing of the assignment. The assignee has failed to point out in what way an accounting will be prejudicial to the rights of the creditors, who are the persons most concerned in the matter. It may be assumed that the interest of the creditors will be promoted by a speedy settlement of the estate.

If the pendency of an action by a creditor to set aside the assignment is to be held to be a sufficient ground for deferring an accounting by an assignee, it is easy to see that the performance of that duty may be delayed indefinitely by an assignee who for any reason is disinclined to render an account of his trust.

The order appealed from must be affirmed.

J. F. Daly, J., concurred.

Order affirmed.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Brian Bonar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: May 22, 2006

/s/ Brian Bonar
---------------
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 800.252 U.S. business. ( a ) The term *U.S. business* means any entity, irrespective of the nationality of the persons that control it, engaged in interstate commerce in the United States.
( b ) Examples: ( 1 ) *Example 1.* Corporation A is organized under the laws of a foreign state and is wholly owned and controlled by a foreign national. It engages in interstate commerce in the United States through a branch or subsidiary. Its branch or subsidiary is a U.S. business. Corporation A and its branch or subsidiary are each also a foreign person.
( 2 ) *Example 2.* Corporation A is organized under the laws of a foreign state and is wholly owned and controlled by a foreign national. Corporation A does not have a branch office, subsidiary, or fixed place of business in the United States. It exports and licenses technology to an unrelated company in the United States. It also provides remote technical support services to customers that are in the United States, but does not have any assets or personnel located in the United States. Assuming no other relevant facts, Corporation A is not a U.S. business.
( 3 ) *Example 3.* Corporation A, a company organized under the laws of a foreign state, is wholly owned and controlled by Corporation X. Corporation X is organized in the United States and is wholly owned and controlled by U.S. nationals. Corporation A does not have a branch office, subsidiary, or fixed place of business in the United States. It exports goods to Corporation X and to unrelated companies in the United States. Assuming no other relevant facts, Corporation A is not a U.S. business.