alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sudan

248 items

        -    Report  		Sudan	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		Sudan Sanctions	   
        -    TIAS  		Sudan (06-712) – Agreement for the Establishment of US Radio Transmitting Facilities	  July 12, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Sudan (02-930.1) – Agreement concerning Foreign Assistance Provisions for the International Verification and Investigation Team	  September 30, 2002 

previous page1…232425

Back to Top
HomeIraq

# Iraq

416 items

        -    Press Statement  		Iran Aligned Militias in Iraq	  Matthew MillerDecember 8, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 2 of 2	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Small Group of the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS	  December 5, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Ian J. McCary, Deputy Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS	  December 5, 2023BRUSSELS HUB 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 4, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 4, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Iraqi Prime Minister al-Sudani	  December 1, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Iraq	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 20, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 20, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 14, 2023 

previous page1…56789…42next page

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1217

JARA UZENDA GOBBI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARTHUR SCOTT GOBBI, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-4728-4-22) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jara Uzenda Gobbi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jara Uzenda Gobbi appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. Gobbi’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Gobbi that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Gobbi failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Gobbi has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Completion of the Palau Bilateral Economic Consultation Meetings

# 									Completion of the Palau Bilateral Economic Consultation Meetings							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 23, 2023

Representatives from the United States of America and the Republic of Palau convened in Koror, Palau, June 21-22 for bilateral economic consultations as called for under the Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Republic of Palau Following the Compact of Free Association Section 432 Review, signed by the United States and Palau in 2010.

U.S. Department of the Interior Assistant Secretary for Insular and International Affairs Carmen G. Cantor and U.S. Department of State Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs Whitney Baird led the U.S. delegation. The President of Palau, H.E. Surangel Whipps Jr., led the Palau delegation with the Minister of Finance, Kaleb Udui, Jr., and other cabinet officials. The bilateral economic consultations included briefings and a review of recommendations from the Palau Economic Advisory Group regarding the country’s economic, financial, and management reforms. The bilateral consultations are one of the requirements under the Agreement to review Palau’s progress in achieving reforms, consistent with the 2010 Compact Review Agreement, as amended. This was the first bilateral economic consultation between the two countries since thefirst annual report of the Palau Economic Advisory Groupwas released in April of this year.

In addition to consultations on matters as required in the 2010 CRA, as amended, during these meetings Palau expressed an interest in joining the Blue Dot Network for infrastructure certification.  Palau is the site of one of the Blue Dot Network’s pilot projects, a sub-sea internet cable to securely connect and expand the country’s telecommunications to the rest of the world.The Compact-mandated Palau Economic Advisory Group was launched in 2022, with funding provided through the U.S. Department of the Interior.  Additional information about the Palau Economic Advisory Group, its annual report, and other related documents can be found at the Pacific and Virgin Islands Training Initiatives website.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPalau

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Double M Helicopters Inc. 2429 Pirates Loop S.E. Mandan, ND 58554

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management Facility 1200 NewJersey Ave S.E. West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 HELICOPTERS d(....J.,.dti'.J.:) 14 March 2013

RE: Double M Helicopters Inc., Petition foran exemption extension from 14 CFR Part 120.117, (a), (2). Pursuantto 14CFR 11.16(b) and 11.81, Double M Helicopters Inc. hereby petitions foran extension of an exemption from the requirement fora separate Drug and Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program for a part 91.147(a) operations. Previous exemption granted is docket number FAA-2011-0574. Double M Helicopters Inc. currentlyoperates undera part 135 Air Carriercertificate and a 14 CFR 91.147 letterofauthorization. Both are operated by the same single pilotoperatorand the only person on each authorization participates in DMH's Part 135 Drug and Alcohol Misuse and Prevention Program. Having an additional program forthe one and only person underthe certificate will provide no increase in safety to the public. Separate and thusdual Drug and Alcohol programswill only increase the cost to DMH's operations and thus totheflying public without providing any increase in safety. DMH ensures that all safety personnel on a contract basis are covered by a Drug and Alcohol Misuse and Prevention Program, and as such, maintains an equivalent level ofsafety forthe flying public. In Summary, Double M Helicopters Inc. seeks and extension ofthe above referenced exemption under 14 CFR 120.117(a), (2) fortwo separate Drug and Alcohol Misuse and Prevention underone company and management.

President, Double M Helicopters Inc.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0593 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-238-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES NO 

Explanation:
HomeDEIA Demographic Baseline Report...Comprehensive Accessible Alternative for the DEIA Demographic Baseline Report

# 									Comprehensive Accessible Alternative for the DEIA Demographic Baseline Report							

Links to the comprehensive accessible alternative data tables of the DEIA Demographic Baseline Report are available below:
        - Department of State DEIA Demographic Baseline Report – Accessibility Alternative
        - Department Snapshot – Accessibility Alternative
        - Demographic by Undersecretariat – Accessibility Alternative
        - Demographic by Bureau – Accessibility Alternative
        - Intersectional Department – Accessibility Alternative
        - Intersectional Department SES & SFS – Accessibility Alternative
        - Intersectional Bureau – Accessibility Alternative
        - Department Comparison – Accessibility Alternative
        - Civil Service Comparison – Accessibility Alternative
        - Foreign Service Generalist Comparison – Accessibility Alternative
        - Foreign Service Specialist Comparison – Accessibility Alternative
        - Civil Service Distribution by Grade – Accessibility Alternative
        - Foreign Service Generalist Distribution by Rank – Accessibility Alternative
        - Foreign Service Specialist Distribution by Rank – Accessibility Alternative
        - Foreign Service Generalist Distribution by Cone – Accessibility Alternative

Back to Top
#### Phyllis K. McGUIRE, Appellant, v. WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1079.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2005239EN.01001202.xml

| 29.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3924 — Apax/Panrico)

(2005/C 239/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3924. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3924. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 800.225 Hold.

The terms *hold(s)* and *holding* mean legal or beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, whether through fiduciaries, agents, or other means.
Document

Exhibit 10.83

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO 
AVON PRODUCTS, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
This SIXTH AMENDMENT is made to the Avon Products, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), by AVON PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (the “Company”).
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Section 14.1 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend, modify or terminate the Plan.  The Company wishes to terminate the Plan effective as of December 31, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended and terminated effective as of December 31, 2020 as follows:
1.         The Introduction to the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new last paragraph thereto as follows:
“Effective as of December 31, 2020, the Company has terminated the Plan and no further deferrals are permitted to the Plan for the period after December 31, 2020.”
2.         A new Section 14.4 of the Plan is hereby added to read as follows:
“14.4   Plan Termination Effective December 31, 2020.  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, in accordance with Section 14.1 of the Plan, effective as of December 31, 2020, the Plan has been terminated and no further deferrals are permitted to the Plan for the period after December 31, 2020.  In accordance with Section 14.1(b) of the Plan, any Section 409A-Covered Amount will continue to be payable in accordance with the terms of the Plan (and any payment elections made under the Plan) in existence on the date of Plan termination.”
[SIGNATURE ON NEXT PAGE]






















Exhibit 10.83

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Sixth Amendment to the Plan to be executed on the date set forth below.


						
	Dated: December 8, 2020	AVON PRODUCTS, INC.
By:
Name: Ginny Edwards
Title: Group Deputy General Counsel
§ 589.205 Prohibited transactions with respect to oil-producing activities in the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy (Directive 4). The following activities by a U.S. person or within the United States are prohibited: The provision, exportation, or reexportation, directly or indirectly, of goods, services (except for financial services), or technology in support of exploration or production for deepwater, Arctic offshore, or shale projects: ( a ) That have the potential to produce oil in the Russian Federation, or in maritime area claimed by the Russian Federation and extending from its territory, and that involve any person determined to be subject to this section, their property, or their interests in property; or
( b ) That are initiated on or after January 29, 2018, that have the potential to produce oil in any location, and in which any person determined to be subject to this section, their property, or their interests in property has a 33 percent or greater ownership interest, or ownership of a majority of the voting interests.
Note 1 to § 589.205 :
This section does not apply to projects that have the potential to produce gas only.
Note 2 to § 589.205 :
The names of persons subject to this section (and earlier versions of Directive 4) are published in the Federal Register and incorporated into OFAC's Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List (SSI List) with the descriptive text “Executive Order 13662 Directive Determination—Subject to Directive 4.” Certain transactions with persons subject to this section may result in the imposition of secondary sanctions, and therefore such persons' entries on the SSI List will also include the descriptive prefix text “Secondary sanctions risk:”, followed by information about the applicable secondary sanctions authority. The SSI List is accessible through the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac . See* § 589.411 concerning entities that may not be listed on the SSI List but whose property and interests in property are nevertheless subject to the prohibitions of this section.
Note 3 to § 589.205 :
*See* § 589.412 concerning projects in which persons subject to paragraph (b) of this section own a 33 percent or greater ownership interest, or ownership of a majority of the voting interests.
Note 4 to § 589.205 :
*See* § 746.5 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) for the Department of Commerce's related license requirement on exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of certain items for use in specified deepwater, Arctic offshore, or shale projects.
Note 5 to § 589.205 :
Section 216 of CAATSA (22 U.S.C. 9511) requires Congressional review prior to the termination of sanctions imposed pursuant to E.O. 13662. Section 222 of CAATSA (22 U.S.C. 9522) describes the Congressional notification required prior to the termination of sanctions imposed pursuant to E.O. 13662.
# Kenya

215 items

        -    Media Note  		Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on Abukar Ali Adan	  October 17, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Nairobi, Kenya: International School of Kenya: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Kenyan President William Ruto Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 21, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Kenyan President Ruto	  September 21, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Artificial Intelligence for Accelerating Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: Addressing Society’s Greatest Challenges	  September 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry Announces $4 Million to Address Climate Mobility in Kenya	  September 7, 2023 
        -    		The United States Is Providing $30 Million to Build Healthy, Fertile Soils as Part of VACS	   
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to Kenya and Romania	  September 1, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Hammer Travels to Kenya and Ethiopia	  August 28, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Statement on the 25th Anniversary of the Embassy Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023 

previous page1…34567…22next page

Back to Top
HomeMongolia

# Mongolia

88 items

        -    Media Note  		The United States and Mongolia Sign MOU to Collaborate on Critical Minerals	  June 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mongolia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Over 170 Business and Community Leaders from 49 Countries Convene in Washington, D.C. for the Spring Professional Fellows Congress, Advancing Governance and Society, Economic Empowerment, and Civic Engagement	  June 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The Launch of the United States–Mongolia–Republic of Korea Trilateral Meeting	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mongolia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nuland’s Travel to Japan and Mongolia	  April 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Sison’s Travel to Madagascar, South Africa, Mauritius, Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Laos	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mongolia	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Advancing the U.S.-Mongolia Economic Partnership	  February 28, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Mongolian Lunar New Year	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 20, 2023 

previous page12345…9next page

Back to Top
§ 402.15 Collateral estoppel. ( a ) When a final determination that the respondent presented or caused to be presented a claim or request for payment falling within the scope of § 402.1 has been rendered in any proceeding in which the respondent was a party and had an opportunity to be heard, the respondent is bound by that determination in any proceeding under this part.
( b ) A person who has been convicted (whether upon a verdict after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere) of a Federal crime charging fraud or false statements is barred from denying the essential elements of the criminal offense if the proceedings under this part involve the same transactions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1998               
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            757,280
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     777,923
<ALLOWANCES>                       15,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,364,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,003,680
<PP&E>                          1,915,246
<DEPRECIATION>                    835,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,237,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             482,199
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           16,598
<OTHER-SE>                      2,846,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,237,064
<SALES>                         1,551,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,551,228
<CGS>                             731,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     731,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  651,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 23,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   162,516
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,500     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               160,016
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      160,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.10
        


</TABLE>
#### Arthur LIVINGSTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. V-434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 7, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.