alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1002.214 Basis for reinstatement after State agency-initiated exclusion. ( a ) The provisions of this section and § 1002.215 apply to the reinstatement in the Medicaid program of all individuals or entities excluded in accordance with § 1002.210, if a State affords reinstatement opportunity to those excluded parties.
( b ) An individual or entity who has been excluded from Medicaid may be reinstated only by the Medicaid agency that imposed the exclusion.
( c ) An individual or entity may submit to the State agency a request for reinstatement at any time after the date specified in the notice of exclusion.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 30, 2018By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     92,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,746
<PP&E>                                          60,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       733,768
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,215,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,116
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,087)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### David BROWER v. QUICK SERVICE BODY SHOP et al.

No. 10389.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1979.

Wayne G. Cresap, New Orleans, counsel for plaintiff-appellant.

Vial, Vial & Lemmon, Leon C. Vial, III, Hahnville, counsel for defendant-appellee.

Before BOUTALL, GARRISON and CHEHARDY, JJ.

BOUTALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, David Brower, appeals the dismissal of his suit without prejudice.

Brower sued Quick Service Body Shop for damages arising out of alleged failure to properly repair his Dodge pick-up truck. The defendant reconvened asserting the repairs had been properly made, and sued for the contract price plus damages. The case was first set for trial on motion of defendant’s attorney for January 9, 1978. Plaintiff’s attorney moved for a continuance pleading he was engaged in defense of another case on that date. Trial was re-set and again continued on plaintiff’s motion that he was a deep-sea diver working offshore and could not appear at trial. The case was continued to May 10, and plaintiff again filed motion for continuance on the same ground asking for an additional 45 days. The court granted continuance to September 6. On September 6 the matter was continued to November 30 without explanation.

When the matter was called for trial on November 30, the attorney for plaintiff was present but plaintiff was absent and had no witnesses. The attorney moved for a continuance which was denied. He was then ordered to proceed and when he could not, plaintiff’s suit was dismissed without prejudice at his cost. Plaintiff appeals contending that he was entitled to a continuance. We affirm.

Code of Civil Procedure Article 1601 provides that a continuance may be granted in any case if there is good ground therefor. Considering the numerous requests for continuance, the lack of a showing that plaintiff’s absence was involuntary or even that his absence was unexpected, and the fact that no witnesses had been subpoenaed, we conclude the trial court was justified in its action. Appellant relies on the case of *Gillentine v. McLeod,*70 So.2d *CMLIX384 (La.App.Orleans 1953) that continuance should be granted unless there are strong reasons for its refusal. The numerated reasons are very strong reasons for this refusal.

Because plaintiff’s attorney could not proceed forward, the trial judge dismissed his suit as of non-suit. C.C.P. Article 1672 provides for dismissal when plaintiff fails to appear on the day set for trial. In the case of *U. S. Machine & Equipment Company v. Kerschner Air Conditioning & Heating Company, Inc.,*342 So.2d 1278 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1977) we held that the mere appearance of plaintiff’s counsel without witnesses and obviously unable to proceed in the event of denial of request for continuance did not preclude dismissal of action. The trial judge has the inherent power to take whatever reasonable actions are necessary to maintain control of his docket. In this case it would appear that plaintiff would go on forever having the matter continued because of his voluntarily refusing to appear. We agree with the dismissal.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1240 Attribution for quality of care and cost measures. ( a ) Beneficiaries are attributed to groups and solo practitioners subject to the value-based payment modifier using a method generally consistent with the method of assignment of beneficiaries under § 425.402 of this chapter, for measures other than the Medicare Spending per Beneficiary measure.
( b ) For the Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB) measure, an MSPB episode is attributed to the group or the solo practitioner subject to the value-based payment modifier whose eligible professionals submitted the plurality of claims (as measured by allowable charges) under the group's or solo practitioner's TIN for Medicare Part B services, rendered during an inpatient hospitalization that is an index admission for the MSPB measure during the applicable performance period described at § 414.1215.
[79 FR 68007, Nov. 13, 2014]
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 25.1353-1A - Electrical equipment and installations

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 25.1353-1A
- Title
- Electrical equipment and installations
- Status
- Active
- Date issued
- 2007-10-22
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- ANM-100, Aircraft Certification Service, Transport Airplane Directorate
- Content
-    -  AC 25.1353-1A  (PDF) 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate25.1353-1Electrical Requirement and Installations2004-03-25 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.400 Definitions. As used in this subpart: *Histocompatibility laboratory* means a laboratory meeting the requirements set forth in § 493.1227 of this chapter and providing the services for the acquisition of kidneys or other organs for transplantation.
*Hospital-based organ procurement organization (HOPO)* means an organ procurement organization that is considered a department of the TH and reports organ acquisition costs it incurs on the TH's Medicare cost report.
*Independent organ procurement organization (IOPO)* means an organ procurement organization that files a Medicare cost report separate from a hospital and meets all of the following: ( 1 ) Is not subject to the control of a hospital with respect to the hiring, firing, training, and paying of employees.
( 2 ) Is not considered as a department of a hospital for insurance purposes (including malpractice insurance, general liability insurance, worker's compensation insurance, and employee retirement insurance).
( 3 ) Reports organ acquisition costs it incurs on the IOPO Medicare cost report.
*Organ,* for Medicare organ acquisition payment purposes, means: ( 1 ) A human kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, or intestine (or multivisceral organs when transplanted at the same time as an intestine).
( 2 ) Pancreata procured on or after October 1, 2004, for the purpose of acquiring pancreatic islet cells for transplantation into individuals who are participating in a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases clinical trial in accordance with section 733 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.
*Organ procurement organization (OPO)* means an organization defined in § 486.302 of this chapter. OPOs can be independent or hospital based.
*Standard acquisition charge (SAC)* means a charge as defined in § 413.404 of this chapter.
*Transplant hospital (TH)* means a hospital that furnishes organ transplants and other medical and surgical specialty services required for the care of transplant patients.
*Transplant hospital/HOPO (TH/HOPO)* refers to a TH, or a TH that operates a HOPO (as previously defined in this section) and performs organ procurement activities as one entity reported on the TH's Medicare cost report.
*Transplant program* means an organ-specific transplant program within a TH (as defined in this section).
[86 FR 73515, Dec. 27, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 72287, Nov. 23, 2022]
In the Senate of the United States,

June 28, 1996.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2739) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for a representational allowance for Members of the House of Representatives, to make technical and conforming changes to sundry

provisions of law in consequence of administrative reforms in

the House of Representatives, and for other purposes.’’, do

pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 2, in the table of contents, strike out:

øSec. 107. Cafeteria plan provision.¿

2 Ω2æPage 2, in the table of contents, strike out ø108¿ and

3 insert: 107

4 Ω3æPage 2, in the table of contents, strike out ø109¿ and

5 insert: 108

6 Ω4æPage 14, strike out lines 1 through 23

7 Ω5æPage 15, line 1, strike out ø108¿ and insert: 107

8 Ω6æPage 16, line 1, strike out ø109¿ and insert: 108

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2739

AMENDMENTS
#### § 137.142 What is a “significant danger” or “risk” to the public health?

A significant danger or risk is determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance with section 507(c) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-6(c)].
§ 1004.20 Sanctions. In addition to any other sanction provided under the law, a practitioner or other person may be— ( a ) Excluded from participating in programs under titles V, XVIII, XIX, and XX of the Social Security Act for a period of no less than 1 year; or
( b ) In lieu of exclusion and as a condition for continued participation in titles V, XVIII, XIX, and XX of the Act, if the violation involved the provision or ordering of health care services (or services furnished at the medical direction or on the prescription of a physician) that were medically improper or unnecessary, required to pay an amount of up to $10,000 for each instance in which improper or unnecessary services were furnished or ordered (or prescribed, if appropriate). The practitioner or other person will be required either to pay the monetary assessment within 6 months of the date of notice or have it deducted from any sums the Federal Government owes the practitioner or other person.
[62 FR 23143, Apr. 29, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices, Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E9-21090 published on page 
45450 of the issue for Wednesday, September 2 2009.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for 
Robert E. Kirkland, Union City, Tennessee, is revised to read as 
follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Robert E. Kirkland, Union City, Tennessee, individually and as 
member of the Kirkland family control group, which consists of himself, 
REK, LP, Union City, Tennessee (Robert and Jenny Kirkland, as general 
partners); the Christopher R. Kirkland Revocable Trust (Christopher R. 
Kirkland, as trustee), Brentwood, Tennessee; Bedford F. Kirkland, 
Lebanon, Tennessee; and Macy Darnell Swensson, Cincinnati, Ohio; to 
individually acquire voting shares of Community First Bancshares, Inc., 
Union City, Tennessee. In addition, the Kirkland family control group 
has also applied to acquire voting shares of Community First 
Bancshares, Inc., Union City, Tennessee.
    Comments on this application must be received by September 16, 
2009.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 2, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-21565 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #32, August 13 - 19, 2008

1) Much of Afghanistan has received below normal

precipitation during the winter and spring, along with an

early snow melt.

2) Locally heavy rainfall is possible across north-central

Pakistan and far eastern Afghanistan.

During the end of the wet season, October - March, high 

temperatures depleted much of Afghanistan’s already 

below-normal snow pack 4 – 6 weeks earlier than 

normal. Hot temperatures have also led to increased 

evaporation from water reservoirs, threatening water 

availability for agriculture. Temperature anomalies have 

eased since the beginning of July, and temperatures 

should average at or below normal during the next week. 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan was below 

average from October - May as well and, as a result, 

underground water sources, used for both drinking water 

and irrigation, have not been replenished. The 

cumulative effects of high temperatures and low rainfall 

have had a direct bearing on most households, who rely 

on agriculture and livestock for their income and food 

needs. Locally heavy rain may fall along the central 

Afghanistan/Pakistan border, but more widespread 

precipitation will not occur until the 2008-09 winter. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Weekly Precipitation (mm) Ending August 11 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA

Figure 3. Precipitation forecast (mm) for August 12 – 

18 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA
No. 99-1788.

#### Pfizer, Inc. *v.*Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Assn.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of International Policyholders Association for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
§ 4.6 Reference, bibliographic, reproduction, and consultation services. ( a ) *General.* To the extent resources permit, the Library will make available, upon request, reference, bibliographic, reproduction, and consultation services. Priority will be given to requests from health-sciences professionals for services not reasonably available through local or regional libraries.
( b ) *Specialized bibliographic services.* The Director may provide bibliographies on individually selected medical or scientific topics upon request where it is consistent with the Library's purpose. The Director may publish and make available for general distribution by the Library, bibliographic searches determined to be of general interest. The Library may also produce and distribute a limited number of bibliographies on topics of general interest to public or nonprofit health-related professional societies, research organizations, and other group users. These bibliographies may be produced on a regularly recurring or intermittent basis under contract between the Library and public or nonprofit agencies, when determined in each case by the Director to be necessary to assure more effective distribution of the bibliographic information.
( c ) *Information retrieval system computer tapes.* To the extent Library resources permit and in order to further the Library's purpose, the Director may make available upon request by agencies, organizations, and institutions copies of all or part of the Library's magnetic tapes.
#### Michael Loren HODAK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-1873.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 5, 1981.

Bierman, Sonnett, Beiley & Shohat and Benedict P. Kuehne, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven R. Jacob and Steven Bolotin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Schlanger v. State,*397 So.2d 1028 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Liechtenstein Foreign Minister Hasler

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Liechtenstein Foreign Minister Hasler							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

November 16, 2022

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Liechtenstein Foreign Minister Dominique Hasler in Washington, D.C. They discussed the multiple waves of missile attacks that Russia perpetrated on Ukrainian cities and civilian infrastructure. They also spoke about Liechtenstein’s priorities for its chairmanship of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers in November 2023. The Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister discussed ways in which the United States and Liechtenstein can continue to partner to promote shared values and strengthen multilateral coordination.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateLiechtensteinMultilateralOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
```

[106th Congress Private Law 16]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl016.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3111]]

Private Law 106-16
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  For the relief of Sergio Lozano. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2000 -  [S. 276]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SERGIO LOZANO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Sergio Lozano shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Sergio Lozano enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 
eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant 
visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

[[Page 114 STAT. 3112]]

    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Sergio Lozano, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if 
applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available 
to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 202(e) of 
such Act.

    Approved November 22, 2000.
```