alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 592.312 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen; any alien admitted for permanent residence into the United States; any entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including its foreign branches); or any person in the United States.
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 8: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 8: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 8 [336 KB]

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
#### In the SUCCESSION of Florence Bell Jones SIMMS. Carolyn Jane Simms HOUGH v. Harold A. SIMMS, III, et al.

No. 65104.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Willard H. Simms, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Lafayette. 371 So.2d 272.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT W. BASS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 280 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Vernado MIXON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 67745.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Vernado Mixon, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 247-393.

Denied.
§ 1003.1580 Statistical sampling. ( a ) In meeting the burden of proof in § 1005.15 of this chapter, the OIG may introduce the results of a statistical sampling study as evidence of the number and amount of claims, specified claims, and/or requests for payment, as described in this part, that were presented, or caused to be presented, by the respondent. Such a statistical sampling study, if based upon an appropriate sampling and computed by valid statistical methods, shall constitute prima facie evidence of the number and amount of claims, specified claims, or requests for payment, as described in this part.
( b ) Once the OIG has made a prima facie case, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, the burden of production shall shift to the respondent to produce evidence reasonably calculated to rebut the findings of the statistical sampling study. The OIG will then be given the opportunity to rebut this evidence.
[81 FR 88364, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42841, July 3, 2023]
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)          The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ended October 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements ofSection  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the accompanying Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|  Date: | January 25, 2006 |   | /**s/ Joseph C. Christenson**                                    |
|-------------|------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |             |   | Joseph C. Christenson                                            |
|        |             |   | President, Chief  Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Export-Import Bank Act Amendments

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					 and 	Eighty-Second Congress, 1951-1953. 						*Export-Import Bank Act Amendments : Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Eighty-Second Congress, First Session, on S. 2006, August 28, 1951*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										August 28, 1951,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/342,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
J

- S27023

- 18

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

FRANK HART Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 2191 EDA 2017 Appeal from the PCRA Order May 15, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0119531

- 1992

BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., and DUBOW, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED MAY 18 , 2018 Frank Hart appeals , pro se , from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, dismissing as untimely his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541

- 9546. That order was entered on May 15, 2017; his notice of appeal was docketed in this Court on June 19, 2017 , thirty

- five days later . By order dated September 5, 2017, this Court directed Hart to show cause why his appeal should not be quashed as untimely filed. Hart filed a timel y response, in which he stated that he filed his notice of appeal on June 17, 2017 , and any further delay is attributable to the mailroom at SCI

- Graterford. Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 903(a), a notice of appeal “shall be filed within 30 days after the entry of the order from which the appeal is taken.” Pa.R.A.P. 903(a). “ Time limitations for taking appeals are strictly construed and cannot be extended as a matter of grace. ”J

- S27023

- 18

- 2

-

Commonwealth v. Burks , 102 A.3d 497, 500 (Pa. Super . 2014) , citing Commonwealth v. Valentine , 928 A.2d 346 (Pa. Super. 2007). Our jurisdiction to hear an appeal is predicated upon the timely filing of the notice of appeal ; if this Court has no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. Commonwealth v. Mi ller , 715 A.2d 1203, 1205 (Pa. Super. 1998) . Where, as here, a prisoner is acting pro se , an appeal is deemed filed for purposes of Rule 903(a) when the prisoner delivers the notice of appeal to prison authorities or places it in the prison mailbox. Comm onwealth v. Jones , 700 A.2d 423, 426 (Pa. 1997). Here, Hart stated that he filed his appeal, i.e., delivered it to his prison’s mailroom, on June 17, 2017. Hart’s monthly prisoner account statement, attached as an exhibit to his response to the rule to show cause, shows that Hart’s prisoner account was debited for postage on June 19, 2017. Even if we credit Hart’s statement that he delivered his notice of appeal on June 17, 2017, his appeal is still untimely. The order in question was filed on May 15, 2017; thus, in order to be timely, Hart was require d to deliver his notice of appeal t o the prison mailroom by June 14 , 2017. 1 As he failed to do so, we must dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Miller , supra . Appeal dismissed.

_______

__________

__________ ______ ____ _______ 1 In 2017, June 14 fell on a Tuesday, so there would have been no reason to extend the filing deadline.J

- S27023

- 18

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 5/18/18
# Central African Republic

60 items

        -    Press Statement  		Designating Entities Linked to Russia’s Malign Activities in Africa	  Matthew MillerMarch 8, 2024 
        -    Other Release  		Les atrocités commises par le groupe Wagner en Afrique : mensonges et vérité	  8 février 2024 
        -    		The Wagner Group’s Atrocities in Africa: Lies and Truth	  February 8, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Religious Freedom Designations	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 8, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  December 8, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Imposing Further Sanctions in Response to Russia’s Illegal War Against Ukraine	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The Central African Republic’s Constitutional Referendum	  Matthew MillerAugust 22, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The Gabonese Republic National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 17, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Central African Republic	  June 27, 2023 

123…6next page

Back to Top
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #06, February 11 - 17, 2009 

Warm temperatures caused some early season melting, 

reducing snow coverage and depth, primarily in the northern 

provinces of Afghanistan. However, during the last two weeks 

colder temperatures and consistent snowfall have brought 

snow depths back up towards normal. Eastern Afghanistan, 

north of Kabul, has experience some localized below normal 

precipitation. (Figure 2) Due to the colder temperatures 

causing some precipitation that would normally fall as rain, to 

fall as snow, snow depths are near normal in this region. 

The coming week is expected to bring additional snow and 

cold temperatures. Last week’s snow fell mainly in the northern 

part of the central highlands and the northeastern mountains. 

This week, the heaviest snowfall will likely be slightly south of 

there. Extreme cold (minimum temperatures below -18 °C) is 

also forecast for the higher elevations in Afghanistan. 

The snow will possibly be in excess of 10 inches in a 24 hour 

period is possible. Thus an increase in snow depths is 

expected in the central and northeast mountains (Figure 3). 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Precipitation deficits, in eastern Afghanistan, are 

likely to continue to reduce during the coming week. 

 Source: FEWS-NET/USGS

Figure 3. Forecast Snow Depth (cm) for February 

16, 2009 

Source: FEWS -NET/NOAA
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7589

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE BUSH, President; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WARDEN OF THE WEST VIRGINIA STATE PRISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-01-48-3) Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Robert Demos, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Robert Demos, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion in Bar or in the Alternative a Special Motion.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Demos v. Bush , No. CA-01-48-3 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 17, 2001). We note that, to the extent that Demos seeks to challenge a Washington conviction, the federal district court in the Southern District of West Virginia lacks jurisdiction to consider a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition challenging that conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (1994). We deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel Vaccine Development: Small Business Grant Applications.
    Date: September 8, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Stephen M. Nigida, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4212, MSC 7812, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1222, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec82858b85888d9fac8f9f9ec2828584c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c12151b15181d0f3c1f0f0e52121514521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-21047 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2670 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H.R. 2670

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held by the 
   United States in certain property located in the County of Iosco, 
                               Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST REGARDING CERTAIN PROPERTY 
              IN IOSCO COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Release Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall release 
the reversionary interest of the United States in the parcel of real 
property described in subsection (b), which was retained by the United 
States when the property was conveyed to the County of Iosco, Michigan, 
in 1960 pursuant to a deed recorded at Liber 144, beginning page 58, in 
the land records of the County.
    (b) Description of Property.--The parcel of real property referred 
to in subsection (a) consists of 1.92 acres in the County of Iosco, 
Michigan, and is described as follows:
            That part of the N.W. \1/4\ of the S.E. \1/4\ of Section 
        11, T.22 N.R. 8 East., Baldwin Township, Iosco County, Michigan 
        described as follows: Commencing at the Center of said Section 
        11, thence South 89 degrees, 15' 41'' East, along the East-West 
        \1/4\ Line of said Section 11, 102.0 feet, thence South 00 
        degrees 08' 07'' East, along an existing fence line, 972.56 
        feet, thence North 89 degrees 07' 13'' W. 69.70 feet to a point 
        in the North-South \1/4\ Line, thence North 02 degrees 02' 12'' 
        West, along said North-South \1/4\ Line, 973.42 feet to the 
        Point of Beginning.
    (c) Additional Terms.--The Secretary may require such terms or 
conditions in connection with the release under this section as the 
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United 
States.
    (d) Instrument of Release.--The Secretary shall execute and file in 
the appropriate office or offices a deed of release, amended deed, or 
other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of the 
reversionary interest under this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 40th District Court of Ellis County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on December 5,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Samuel Fuente Ortez v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00286-CR Trial Court Number: 37162CR

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 5, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on February 20, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 84402 

FILED 

MAY 1 6 2022 

EFI k gf AIPREI A 

RON cLE E COURT 5.y 

8y DEPUTY CLERK 

VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, 

D/B/A CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL 

MEDICAL CENTER, A FOREIGN 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

ESTATE OF REBECCA POWELL, 

THROUGH BRIAN POWELL, AS 

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR; DARCI 

CREECY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN 

HEIR; TARYN CREECY, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR; 

ISAIAH KHOSROF, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS AN HEIR; AND LLOYD 

CREECY, INDIVIDUALLY, 

Respondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal 

of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BROLZ 

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge 

Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge 

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas 

Paul Padda Law, PLLC 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

BY: 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(0) 1947 

A.2- /5 332-
EX-10.17(e)




	 *****
	 Certain information in this document has been excluded pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10).



 Such excluded information is not material and would likely cause competitive harm to the registrant if
publicly disclosed. 
 Exhibit 10.17(e) 

LETTER AGREEMENT NO. 8 
 As of
October 31, 2014 
 Frontier Airlines Inc. 

7001 Tower Road, 
 Denver,
Colorado 80249-7312 
 REFERENCE: ***** 

FRONTIER AIRLINES Inc. (the “Buyer”) and AIRBUS (the “Seller”) have entered into an A321 Aircraft Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”), dated as of even date herewith that covers, among other things, the sale by the Seller and the purchase by the Buyer of certain Aircraft. 

The Buyer and the Seller have agreed to set forth in this Letter Agreement No. 8 (the “Letter Agreement”) certain additional
terms and conditions regarding the sale of the Aircraft. 
 Both parties agree that this Letter Agreement shall constitute an integral,
nonseverable part of said Agreement, that the provisions of said Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and that this Letter Agreement shall be governed by the provisions of said Agreement, except that if the Agreement and this
Letter Agreement have specific provisions that are inconsistent, the specific provisions contained in this Letter Agreement shall govern. 

  
 Confidential 








 If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding, please execute the original and one
(1) copy hereof in the space provided below and return a copy to the Seller. 
  

									
	 Agreed and Accepted
	 	       Agreed and Accepted
	 	
			
	 For and on behalf of
	 	       For and on behalf of
	 	
			
	 FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.
	 	       AIRBUS S.A.S.
	 	
					
	 Name            :
	 	 /s/ James G. Dempsey
	 	       Name        :
	 	 /s/ Christophe Mourey
	 	
					
	 Title              :
	 	 Chief Financial Officer
	 	       Title          :
	 	 Senior Vice President Contracts
	 	
					
	 Date              :
	 	 [Undated]
	 		 		 	


  
 Confidential
#### § 137.5 Effect of these regulations on Federal program guidelines, manual, or policy directives.

Unless expressly agreed to by the Self-Governance Tribe in the compact or funding agreement, the Self-Governance Tribe shall not be subject to any agency circular, policy, manual, guidance, or rule adopted by the IHS, except for the eligibility provisions of section 105(g) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j(g)] and regulations promulgated under section 517 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-16(e)].