alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 57541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22856]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Monday, September 29, 2014, 4:00-5:00 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Suite 8312, Washington, DC 20525 (Please go to 10th floor 
reception area for escort).

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 800-988-9777 conference call 
access code number 6764819. Any interested member of the public may 
call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur 
charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and CNCS will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number. Replays are generally available one hour after a call ends. The 
toll-free phone number for the replay is 866-441-0996 TTY: 800-833-
3722. The end replay date is October 29, 2014, 10:59 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Chair's Opening Comments
    a. Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting Agenda
    b. Introduction and Acknowledgements
    c. Summary Status of Board Interaction
II. Consideration of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. CEO Report
IV. Acknowledgement of Board Member Transitions
V. Discussions, Deliberations and Official Actions
VI. Public Comments
VII. Final Comments and Adjournment

    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of 
the Board may do so in writing or in person. Individuals may submit 
written comments to jmauk@cns.gov subject line: SEPTEMBER 2014 CNCS 
BOARD MEETING by 4:00 p.m. (ET) on September 24, 2014. Individuals 
attending the meeting in person who would like to comment will be asked 
to sign-in upon arrival. Comments are requested to be limited to 2 
minutes.

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS: The Corporation for National and Community 
Service provides reasonable accommodations to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. Anyone who needs an interpreter or 
other accommodation should notify Ida Green at igreen@cns.gov or 202-
606-6861 by 5 p.m. (ET) on September 25, 2014.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenny Mauk, Special Assistant to 
the CEO, Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: 202-606-6615. Fax: 202-606-
3460. TTY: 800-833-3722. Email: jmauk@cns.gov.

    Dated: September 22, 2014.
Wilsie Y. Minor,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-22856 Filed 9-22-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
```
#### § 91.4 Preservation of property.

It shall be unlawful for any person without proper authority to wilfully destroy, damage, deface, or remove property or any part thereof or any furnishings therein.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 16, 2014

Order 

Clerk

June 16, 2014

149458

IN THE MATTER OF

HONORABLE DENNIS N. POWERS SC: 149458

52-1 DISTRICT COURT JTC Formal Complaint 94

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

___________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the request by the Judicial Tenure Commission for 

appointment of a master is considered, and Honorable Jeanne Stempien is appointed 

Master to hear Formal Complaint No. 94.
#### REPUBLIC NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE SERVICES, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 74-84.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 7, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Regulatory Evaluation 

2015"" -Alf\/\-((1/AD 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

:ldd 1he II'Or k hour.\. porfs ~.·osl, ond 1111111ber t?l U.5i. regislered pruducls luI he I able! he/o\1'. When FOil are 

finished. click 011 the .. {,.{,dale Fieltl.~ ·· hu/1011 10 ollfOIIIa!iml/y.f/11 i11tlie /oJals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., I nspcction, propeller, nppl iance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do no/ include oncondilion costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

I n .... p .. :( l ion. n.:pa ir. 8 0 ~: I c. 

v, t / IV\..j~ /) -" 

r ~ /. \ 'Y'f' tl-'1(/ v ,. ~ ) . / 

' I 

I • 

• 

: 

I 

The known number of products in compliance: "" li Ill b l.'l' 

Total Costs of compliance tor U.S. fleet: s 0 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) Sun known 

On-Condition Costs: 0 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing. and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection 8 ' ~ " tiS'nQ 

Installation 8 1~8 ( '· va rJ w 

' 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This.field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?-

YES* 0 NO 181 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO 181 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

e ither a Yes or No answer. Q , 

YES 0 NO 181 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspo1tation? G 

YES* D NO 181 

*Explanation:
#### Reynold FRINK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeSomalia

# Somalia

92 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		Evaluation of Assistance to Somali Police Force (SPF) Joint Investigative Teams (JITs) [PDF]	  January 1, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Somalia (15-408) – Agreement Relating to Employment of Dependents of Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts Assigned to Official Duty	  April 8, 2015 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2896 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2896

  To limit the issuance of public debt obligations after December 31, 
                                 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1996

   Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Shays) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit the issuance of public debt obligations after December 31, 
                                 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Balanced Budget Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC DEBT OBLIGATIONS AFTER 
              DECEMBER 31, 2001.

    No obligation subject to the limitation under section 3101(b) of 
title 31, United States Code, may be issued to the public after 
December 31, 2001. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any 
obligation (or series of obligations) issued to refund an obligation 
issued before January 1, 2002.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE.

    Upon the enactment of a joint resolution declaring a national 
emergency, section 1 is suspended for the 6-month period beginning upon 
such date of enactment. Congress and the President may, by law, extend 
such 6-month period if such declaration of war or national emergency is 
still in effect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2.2 Purpose and effect. ( a ) *Purpose.* Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2(g), the regulations in this part impose restrictions upon the use and disclosure of substance use disorder patient records (“records,” as defined in this part) which are maintained in connection with the performance of any part 2 program. The regulations in this part include the following subparts: ( 1 ) Subpart B: General Provisions, including definitions, applicability, and general restrictions;
( 2 ) Subpart C: Uses and Disclosures With Patient Consent, including uses and disclosures that require patient consent and the consent form requirements;
( 3 ) Subpart D: Uses and Disclosures Without Patient Consent, including uses and disclosures which do not require patient consent or an authorizing court order; and
( 4 ) Subpart E: Court Orders Authorizing Use and Disclosure, including uses and disclosures of records which may be made with an authorizing court order and the procedures and criteria for the entry and scope of those orders.
( b ) *Effect.* ( 1 ) The regulations in this part prohibit the use and disclosure of records unless certain circumstances exist. If any circumstance exists under which use or disclosure is permitted, that circumstance acts to remove the prohibition on use and disclosure but it does not compel the use or disclosure. Thus, the regulations in this part do not require use or disclosure under any circumstance other than when disclosure is required by the Secretary to investigate or determine a person's compliance with this part pursuant to § 2.3(c).
( 2 ) The regulations in this part are not intended to direct the manner in which substantive functions such as research, treatment, and evaluation are carried out. They are intended to ensure that a patient receiving treatment for a substance use disorder in a part 2 program is not made more vulnerable by reason of the availability of their record than an individual with a substance use disorder who does not seek treatment.
( 3 ) The regulations in this part shall not be construed to limit: ( i ) A patient's right, as described in 45 CFR 164.522, to request a restriction on the use or disclosure of a record for purposes of treatment, payment, or health care operations.
( ii ) A covered entity's choice, as described in 45 CFR 164.506, to obtain the consent of the patient to use or disclose a record to carry out treatment, payment, or health care operations.
[89 FR 12618, Feb. 16, 2024]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL MCKEY,

 Appellant,

v.

LINDA STALLINGS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00042-CV

Appeal from the

119th District Court 

of Tom Green County, Texas 

(TC#B-15-0093-F) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Palafox, J., Concurs
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended October 28, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned, Debra Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andAnthony Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that:

 

1)            the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2)            the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date:  January 24, 2005 | /s/  Debra Koenig        |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    | Debra  Koenig            |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                    |                     |
|                    |                     |
| Date:  January 24, 2005 | /s/  Anthony Carroll     |   |
|                    | Anthony  Carroll         |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to VICORPRestaurants, Inc. and will be retained by VICORP Restaurants, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|/s/ Karen L. Johannes                        
|Karen L. Johannes                            
|Chief Financial Officer Paulson Capital
Corp.
|March 28, 2008                               

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6488

DEANTHONY DOANE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-01154-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: June 18, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAnthony Doane, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

DeAnthony Doane appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) action without prejudice 

for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Doane v. Johnson, No. 

1:09-cv-01154-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 26, 2010; entered 

Mar. 1, 2010). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel 

and for an evidentiary hearing. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
40625.

#### SMITH v. NOXON RUG MILLS, INC. et al.

Decided October 27, 1964.

*Greene, Neely, Buckley & DeRieux, McCamy, Minor, Vining & Phillips, John Minor, III,*for plaintiff in error.

*Pittman & Kinney, Mitchell & Mitchell, D. W. Mitchell, Goins, Gammon, Baker & Robinson,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of this court *(Smith v. Noxon Rug Mills, Inc.,*109 Ga. App. 724, 137 SE2d 322), having been reversed by the Supreme Court *(Noxon Rug Mills, Inc. v. Smith,*220 Ga. 291, 138 SE2d 569), the judgment of this court affirming in part. and reversing in part the judgment of the trial court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Russell, JJ., concur.*
HomeDSS Press Releases...Cuban nationals sentenced in relation to sex trafficking in area strip clubs

# 									Cuban nationals sentenced in relation to sex trafficking in area strip clubs							

DSS Releases

July 12, 2023

For Immediate Release – July 12,2023

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

CubaDSS ReleasesHuman TraffickingTexas

Back to Top
# CUANESPARKS
CHEVROLET April3, 2013 To Whom it MayConcern:**~L** '.J \,) 

### 519 W BROADWAY LEWISTOWN, UT !59457 406·535·3455 SOO•S23·332E5 WWW.SPARKSCHEVV.COM

My understanding isthat wemaybe losingair service funding for our Lewistown Airport due to**non~passenger** use. I have Sparks Rent-A-Car with my Chevrolet Dealership. Since, Silver Airways took overmy rental business has dropped 80%. This means that motels, gas stations and otherbusinesses have dropped also. The bigreason the number ofpassengers has dropped is because Great Lakes had flights from Denver to Lewistown. The business people would fly in, rent a car and motel rooms, buy gas, eat, and then cotU.d fly out the next evening. I use to fly toDenver a lotwhen we had Great Lakes because ofgreat connections and didn't take that long to get there. Now I don't fly because I don't like sitting in the Billings airport waiting around, so I quit Flying. Ifwe lose our airline, our town will 

### dryup even more. Look at what happened when we lost ourrail road it really hurt Lewistown. But, I guess ifwe lose our airservice we can have morejoggingpaths. Lewistown will dry up more. We need Denver flights from here with maybe a stopin Wyoming. Please look into getting Great Lakes back so we can have good service plus be able to go to Denver. By doing this wecan have business people, hunters, tourists, and families coming to see family members. Thank you for yourtime and ifanyone wants to call me they can at 406,..350-2899.


# DUANE !iPARK!i 

# I

Duane D. Sparks 

### www.sparkschevy.com 

### CHEVROLET 406-535-3455 Duane Sparks- Owner Cell: 406-350-2899 f f ,. 'r
#### Ineta BAKER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52622.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 15, 1981.

Samuel H. Wilkins, Jim Nelson, Wilkins, Ellington & James, Jackson, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Robert D. Find-ley, Sp. Asst Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Breland Hilburn, Special Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
HomeCaribbean Basin Security Initiative...Caribbean Basin Security Initiative: The Bahamas

# 									Caribbean Basin Security Initiative: The Bahamas							

The Bahamas benefits directly from CBSI programs, including:
        - Purchase and repair of maritime interdiction and patrol assets to increase the capacity of the Royal Bahamian Defence and Police Forces to control its national territory and waters;
        - Training and equipment to reduce cultivation, production, and trafficking of illicit drugs through supporting the counternarcotics operations of Operation Bahamas, Turks and Caicos (OPBAT);
        - Strengthening the professionalism of law enforcement institutions through technical assistance, equipment, and training on information collection capabilities, tactical techniques, and narcotics investigations;
        - Providing training and equipment to Her Majesty’s Prison and the Sandilands Rehabilitation Center to expand participation in drug treatment and rehabilitation programs.
        - Funding the development of a secure communications network for the Royal Bahamas Defense Force.
        - Mentoring, training and advising on maritime maintenance from the Technical Assistance Field Team to improve the operational readiness of their patrol boat fleet, to include equipment and software to ensure maintenance issues are being tracked.
        - Improved maritime domain awareness through the participation in the Cooperative Situational Information Integration Initiative that provides regional air and maritime tracks for operations.
        - Ongoing training and equipment for the maritime service to ensure U.S. provided vessels are maintained.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCaribbean Basin Security InitiativeThe Bahamas

Back to Top
#### § 136.13 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 332.12 Fiscal agents.

(a) Federal Reserve Banks and Branches referred to below, as fiscal agents of the United States, are authorized to perform such services as may be requested of them by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, in connection with the reissue, redemption and payment of Series H bonds.

(b)

(1) The following Federal Reserve Offices have been designated to provide savings bond services:

| Servicing office | Reserve districts served | Geographic area served |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Buffalo Branch, P.O. Box 961, Buffalo, NY 14240 | New York, Boston | CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ (northern half), NY (City & State), RI, VT, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Pittsburgh Branch, P.O. Box 867, Pittsburgh, PA 15230 | Cleveland, Philadelphia | DE, KY, (eastern half), NJ (southern half), OH, PA, WV (northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, VA 23261 | Richmond, Atlanta | AL, DC, FL, LA (southern half), MD, MS (southern half), NC, SC, TN (eastern half), VA, WV (except northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55480 | Minneapolis, Chicago | IA, IL (northern half), IN (northern half), MN, MT, ND, SD, WI. |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64198 | Dallas, San Francisco, Kansas City, St. Louis | AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, IL (southern half), IN (southern half), KS, KY (western half), LA (northern half), MO, MS (northern half), NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, TN (western half), TX, WA, WY, UT and GU. |

(2) Until March 1, 1996, other Federal Reserve Offices may continue to provide some savings bond services, but such services will be phased out over the period prior to that date.

[59 FR 10539, Mar. 4, 1994]