alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_230499.htm


EXHIBIT 10.19


 


DIRECTOR FEE SUMMARY


 


Set forth below is a summary of the director fee arrangements for non-employee directors serving on the Board of Directors of Mercantile Bank Corporation (“Mercantile”). Director compensation is based on a single retainer figure and meeting fees have been discontinued. The retainer fee is higher to each director who serves as Chairman of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee, as reflected in the chart below. One-half (50%) of the retainer value is paid in shares of Mercantile common stock as of the annual meeting date, with the share count calculated on the day of issuance. One-half (50%) of the retainer value is paid in cash, with payments divided into equal instalments payable at the end of each calendar quarter. Directors who fail to meet an attendance threshold of 75% of scheduled board and committee meetings would not receive their fourth quarter cash payment.


 


	 	 	
			Retainer Value

			
	
			Chairman of the Board

				 	
			$83,200

			
	
			Chair of the Audit Committee

				 	
			$71,800

			
	
			Chair of the Compensation Committee

				 	
			$68,600

			
	
			Chair of the Governance Committee

				 	
			$64,400

			
	
			Executive Session Facilitator

				 	
			$62,400

			
	
			Non-Chair Directors

				 	
			$60,300

			



 


 


Under the Bank’s deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors, Mercantile directors who are also directors of the Bank may elect to defer the cash portion of their annual retainer until they are no longer serving on the Board or until specific dates that they select. Directors are eligible to receive stock-based awards under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2020.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Southside Bancshares Corp.:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 33-78454, No. 333-00579 and No. 333-91105) of Southside
Bancshares Corp. of our report dated February 16, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Southside Bancshares Corp. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in
the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Southside Bancshares Corp.


                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 30, 2001
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NYKEYA KILBY, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CVS PHARMACY, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56130

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02051-MMAKSC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Argued December 2, 2013

Submitted June 8, 2016

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

We reverse and remand to the district court to reconsider in light of the

California Supreme Court’s opinion in Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 368 P.3d 554

(Cal. 2016).

FILED

JUN 08 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
All pending motions for judicial notice are denied as moot.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Out-Patient Drug Treatment Research Clinic (9913).                    

*Date:*                         October 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1439,                         *lf33c.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 20, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20632 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 597.305 Effective date.

Except as that term is used in § 597.201(d), the term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part which is October 6, 1997, or, in the case of foreign terrorist organizations designated after that date and their agents, the earlier of the date on which a financial institution receives actual or constructive notice of such designation or of the Secretary of Treasury's exercise of their authority to block financial transactions pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(2)(C) and § 597.201(a).

[62 FR 52495, Oct. 8, 1997, as amended at 89 FR 15743, Mar. 5, 2024]
#### § 137.68 May funds from a statutorily mandated grant added to a funding agreement be reallocated?

No, unless it is permitted under the statute authorizing the grant or under the terms and conditions of the grant award, funds from a statutorily mandated grant may not be reallocated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Healthwatch, Inc. for the three months ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000725627
<NAME> HEALTHWATCH, INC.

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          63,317
<SECURITIES>                                 3,210,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,692
<INVENTORY>                                     32,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,597,202
<PP&E>                                         480,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                 409,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,785,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          607,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,501
<COMMON>                                       107,137
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,063,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,785,597
<SALES>                                        104,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,266
<CGS>                                           81,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  980,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (963,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (963,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (963,244)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.45)


</TABLE>
#### Vicenta Santiago de Martínez, Plaintiff and Appellant, *v.*The Great American Insurance Co. of New York, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 7133.

Argued November 4, 1937.

Decided November 18, 1937.

*F. Colón Díaz*for appellant. *J. Valldejuli Rodriguez*for appellee.

Mr. Justice Travieso

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff claims the sum of $1,000, the amount of a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant covering a Day-Elder truck weighing three tons, which was destroyed by fire on September 27, 1930, and in addition legal interest, costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.

The defendant admitted the issuance of the policy, denied the other essential facts of the complaint, and set up the following special defenses:

> *“First:*That, although the fire alleged in the complaint did occur in the place and on the date and hour mentioned in the complaint, the same took place through the orders, will, and volition of the plaintiff, who by means of her agents and employees, acted in such a way that if the fire did occur as alleged in the complaint, it was voluntarily caused by the plaintiff.

> *“Second:*That in view of the way in which the fire alleged in the complaint happened, it is not covered by the policy mentioned in the complaint, nor by any other contract of insurance.

> *301
>       *“Third:*That the complaint in this case does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, this allegation being based on Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Puerto Rico.

> *“Fotirth:*That if: the accident did occur, it was not due to an act of God but rather to tbe wilful agents wlio illegaly executed such acts for the purpose of taking advantage of any claim they might have.'’

The lower court rendered judgment for defendant with costs on the plaintiff. And in its statement of the case and opinion, after a careful analysis of the evidence, it held as satisfactorily proven that “the fire which destroyed the truck insured by the defendant, and which gave origin to this action was not due to an act of God not to chance, but rather to wilful agents who illegaly executed such act for the purpose of taking advantage of any claim-they might have.”

In her brief the appellant assigns as the only error the following:

> “The District Court of the Judicial District of Ponce, Puerto Rico, committed a mainfest error in weighing the evidence in this ease.”

We have carefully studied the transcript of the evidence and we are of opinion that the district court was perfectly justified in weighing the evidence as it did. In our judgment there is no manifest error in the weighing of the evidence. And as it is not claimed that the trial court acted moved by bias, prejudice, or partiality, the judgment appealed from must he affirmed.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Juan Enriquez v. Ahmed A. Morsy, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00622-CV

Trial court case number: 18-CV-0884

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Juan Enriquez, has filed an appeal of the trial court’s July 28, 2022 order 

sealing certain records. Appellee, Ahmed A. Morsy, M.D., has filed a motion to dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that because the order is an “incidental ruling” and not a 

final judgment, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 76a governs the sealing of trial court records. It states in 

part:

Appeal. Any order (or portion of an order or judgment) relating to sealing or 

unsealing court records shall be deemed to be severed from the case and a final 

judgment which may be appealed by any party or intervenor who participated in 

the hearing preceding issuance of such order.

TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a(8).

1

 Accordingly, the July 28, 2022 order sealing the records is immediately 

appealable. See Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 n.13 (Tex. 1992) (“This 

court has, however, deemed orders relating to sealing or unsealing court records to be final, 

appealable judgments.”); Stacey v. Shadd, No. 03-20-00126-CV, 2020 WL 7640041, at *4 (Tex. 

App.—Austin Dec. 23, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.) (Rule 76a’s “language provides appellate 

jurisdiction over the disputed order” that related to sealing records); Kallergis v. Brupbacher, 

No. 14-19-00470-CV, 2021 WL 506081, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 11, 2021, 

no pet. h.) (Rule 76a(8) authorizes such an [interlocutory] appeal.”).

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

1 The reporter’s record indicates appellant participated in the July 15, 2022 hearing on the sealing 

of the records.
Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually 

Date: October 6, 2022
HomeMarshall Islands

# Marshall Islands

70 items

        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Investing in the Future of the Pacific: U.S. Assistance Continues to Address WWII-era Explosive Hazards	  September 29, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Governance of the Seas: Assistance to Pacific Island Partners	  September 28, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting With the Republic of the Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Kabua and Select Compact Negotiation Delegation Members	  July 29, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Marshall Islands	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Marshall Islands	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Republic of the Marshall Islands, National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 29, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (22-413) – Agreement Concerning Certain Technical Assistance to be Provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pursuant to Section 224 of the Compact of Free Association, as amended	  April 13, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Marshall Islands	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcing the Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 22, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Marshall Islands	  December 9, 2021 

previous page12345…7next page

Back to Top
# Mongolia

87 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Mongolian Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene	  March 25, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Trip to Japan and Mongolia	  March 19, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On Mongolian Tsagaan Sar	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 9, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: International School of Ulaanbaatar: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on The United States-Mongolia Annual Bilateral Consultations	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: International School of Ulaanbaatar: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Elizabeth Allen Attends Signing of New Agreement to Increase Mongolian Participation in the Fulbright Program	  September 22, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Fact Sheet  		United States – Mongolia Memorandum of Understanding on Mineral Resources	  August 29, 2023 

123…9next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph JACKSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 82-KH-1126.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re Joseph Jackson, applying for writ of mandamus, Criminal District Court. Parish of Orleans. No. 269-399.

Denied. District court advised that it has no motion filed by relator in that court.
No. 99-6275.

No. 99-6341.

#### In re Lavertu; and In re Parker.

Petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Conviction and Sentencing of U.S. Citizen Brittney Griner in Russia    

# 									Conviction and Sentencing of U.S. Citizen Brittney Griner in Russia    							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 4, 2022

Today’s conviction and sentencing by a Russian court of U.S. citizen Brittney Griner to nine years in prison further compounds the injustice of her wrongful detention. This step puts a spotlight on our significant concerns with Russia’s legal system and the Russian government’s use of wrongful detentions to advance its own agenda, using individuals as political pawns.

Nothing about today’s decision changes our determination that Brittney Griner is wrongfully detained, and we will continue working to bring Brittney and fellow wrongfully detained U.S. citizen Paul Whelan home. This is an absolute priority of mine and the Department’s.

We will also continue to press for fair and transparent treatment for all U.S. citizen detainees in Russia.

Russia, and any country engaging in wrongful detention, represents a threat to the safety of everyone traveling, working, and living abroad.  The United States opposes this practice everywhere.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsLawOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaThe Secretary of StateOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs

Back to Top
HomeMorocco

# Morocco

163 items

        -    Media Note  		2023 International Women of Courage Award Recipients Announced	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement by the Co-Chairs of the Global Coalition to  Defeat ISIS Africa Focus Group	  March 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Morocco	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Advancing Access to Justice for Morocco’s Underserved Populations	  February 9, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita	  January 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Algeria and Morocco	  January 20, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Derek Chollet, Counselor of the Department of State; Elizabeth Allen, Senior Official for the Bureau of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs; and Ambassador Cindy McCain, U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN Agencies in Rome	  January 10, 2023Dubai Regional Media Hub 
        -    Media Note  		Interagency Delegation to the United Arab Emirates	  January 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. and Morocco Co-Host Proliferation Security Initiative Workshop	  December 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Hussain Travels to Morocco, The Gambia, and Senegal	  November 28, 2022 

previous page1…45678…17next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 170 (Thursday, September 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45668-45669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6754]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Playing With Pictures: The Art of Victorian 
Photocollage''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Playing with Pictures: The Art of Victorian 
Photocollage,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on 
or about October 10, 2009, until on or about January 3, 2010, The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 2, 
2010, until on or about May 9, 2010, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C 
Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.


[[Page 45669]]


    Dated: August 28, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-21316 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P