alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 596.500 Licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part.

[68 FR 53660, Sept. 11, 2003]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belmont Bancorp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jane R. Marsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jane R. Marsh      
|Jane R. Marsh          
|Chief Financial Officer



May 10, 2004
Exhibit No. 23
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-111503) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-36720, File No. 333-36722 and File No. 333-144689) of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. of our report, dated March 29, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC
 
 
 Birmingham, Alabama
 March 29, 2011
#### INDIANAPOLIS MORRIS PLAN CORPORATION, a corporation, Appellant, v. Raul PORTELA and Vivian Portela, his wife, Appellees.

No. 78-207.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1978.

*841Sobo & Wellens, Fort Lauderdale, and Joseph M. Balocco, Hollywood, for appellant.

Gus Efthimiou, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-lender seeks review of a final judgment in equity, refusing foreclosure of a mortgage but entering a money judgment for the amount of the loan less civil usury penalties. The appellees cross-assign error as to the entry of the judgment for the balance due. We affirm.

The appellant came, into a court of equity. The record supports a finding of usury and, therefore, he was without clean hands and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to lend equity powers to enforce the mortgage. *Dale*v. *Jennings,*90 Fla. 234, 107 So. 175 (1925); *Sahler v. Sahler,*154 Fla. 206, 17 So.2d 105 (1944); *Brenner v. Smullian,*84 So.2d 44 (Fla.1955); *Bella Isla Construction Corporation*v. *Trust Mortgage Corporation,*347 So.2d 649 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Continental Mortgage Investors v. Sailboat Key, Inc.,*354 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).

The court also would have been right in declining to enforce the mortgage as being against the public policy of this State, having found civil usury. *Sherbill v. Miller Manufacturing Company,*89 So.2d 28 (Fla.1956); *Davis v. Ebsco Industries, Inc.,*150 So.2d 460 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); *Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.,*246 So.2d 631 (Fla.4th DCA 1971). We have not overlooked the case of *Staros v. Avalon Shores, Inc.,*249 So.2d 448 (Fla.1st DCA 1971), but by its very decision it indicates that a chancellor has the discretion to deny foreclosure.

We find no merit to the appellant’s assignments of error. We cannot reach the merit of the cross-assignment filed by the appellees because no point on appeal was filed in support thereof and, therefore, it is considered abandoned. *Pittman v. Roberts,*122 So.2d 333 (Fla.2d DCA 1960); *Time Insurance Company*v. *Arnold,*319 So.2d 638 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); *Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville v. Dent,*350 So.2d 481 (Fla.1st DCA 1977); Florida Rules Appellate Procedure 3.7 i.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 1003.1410 Amount of penalties. The OIG may impose a penalty of not more than $1,000,000 per violation. ( a ) For this subpart, *violation* means a practice, as defined in 45 CFR 171.102, that constitutes information blocking, as set forth in 45 CFR part 171.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2452
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2452
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    62
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (70)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (70)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (70)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        455,800
<SECURITIES>                               18,835,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                  69,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19,360,400
<PP&E>                                      4,777,900
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,666,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24,138,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,798,300
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,332,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            7,910,800
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,150,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              141,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             5,945,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         5,945,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                5,945,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                     81.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   81.34


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20471]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,687]

Atmel Corporation, Test Department, Colorado Springs, CO; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on July 15, 
2009 by three workers on behalf of workers of Atmel Corporation, Test 
Department, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification, (TA-W-64,701) which expires on January 13, 2011. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of August 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-20471 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arlie H. DANIELS, Jr.

No. 67777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Arlie H. Daniels, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Beauregard.

Denied on the showing made.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the registrant);2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/
Linda J. Miles
# North Korea

439 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 9, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: North Korea	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Democratic People's Republic of Korea	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Democratic People's Republic of Korea	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		North Korea	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…41424344next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.263 May the Secretary provide a grant to a Self-Governance Tribe for technical assistance to overcome conditions identified under § 137.257?

Yes, the Secretary may make a grant for the purpose of obtaining technical assistance as provided in section 103 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-h].
# C_2005250EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 October 2005

(2005/C 250/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2144 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4618 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,687 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5484 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,8 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,888 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9556 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5731 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,638 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,61 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9223 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6008 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,53 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,943 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6412 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6016 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4325 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,418 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7423 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0451 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 259,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9702 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8269 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,402 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 177,4 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5774 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,672 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,595 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,586 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2144

JPY

Japanese yen

137,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4618

GBP

Pound sterling

0,687

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5484

ISK

Iceland króna

74,8

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,888

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9556

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5731

CZK

Czech koruna

29,638

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,61

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9223

RON

Romanian leu

3,6008

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,53

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,943

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6412

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6016

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4325

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,418

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7423

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0451

KRW

South Korean won

1 259,64

ZAR

South African rand

7,9702

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8269

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,402

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 177,4

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5774

PHP

Philippine peso

67,672

RUB

Russian rouble

34,595

THB

Thai baht

49,586

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 137.442 What happens after the hearing? ( a ) Within 30 days after the end of the hearing or any post-hearing briefing schedule established by the ALJ, the ALJ must send all parties a recommended decision by certified mail, return receipt requested. The recommended decision shall contain the ALJs findings of fact and conclusions of law on all the issues. The recommended decision must also state that the Self-Governance Tribe has the right to object to the recommended decision.
( b ) The recommended decision must contain the following statement:
Within 15 days of the receipt of this recommended decision, you may file an objection to the recommended decision with the Secretary under § 137.443. An appeal to the Secretary under 25 CFR 900.165(b) shall be filed at the following address: Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20201. You shall serve copies of your notice of appeal on the official whose decision is being appealed. You shall certify to the Secretary that you have served this copy. If neither party files an objection to the recommended decision within 15 days, the recommended decision will become final.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1997                 
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            337,228
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     781,442
<ALLOWANCES>                       15,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,157,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,453,237
<PP&E>                          1,866,454
<DEPRECIATION>                    736,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,758,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             564,523
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           16,366
<OTHER-SE>                      2,238,247 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,758,993
<SALES>                         1,480,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,480,196
<CGS>                             683,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     683,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  622,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 29,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   158,829
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,500     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               156,329
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      156,329   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.11
        


</TABLE>
HomeThailand

# Thailand

		Environment		

170 items

        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 
        -    Report  		Thailand	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Thailand	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Thailand	  June 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Thailand (17-323) – Amendments and Extensions to Agreement of August 11, 1965 Regarding Telecommunication Radio Transmitting and Receiving Facilities	  March 23, 2017 
        -    		International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEAs)	   
        -    TIAS  		Thailand (17-315) – Arrangement for Atomic Energy Nuclear Safety	  March 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Thailand	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Thailand (15-204) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  February 4, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Thailand (13-806) – Agreement Relating to Scientific and Technical Cooperation	  August 6, 2013 

previous page1…14151617next page

Back to Top
# C_2005155EN.01001502.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 April 2005

in Case T-211/03 Faber Chimica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for figurative mark Faber - Opposition of the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks NABER - Refusal of registration)

(2005/C 155/30)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-211/03: Faber Chimica Srl, established in Fabriano (Italy), represented by P. Tartuferi and M. Andreano, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: M. Capostagno and O. Montalto), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Industrias Quimicas Naber, SA Nabersa, established in Valencia (Spain) — action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 March 2003 (Case R 620/2001-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Faber Chimica Srl and Industrias Quimicas Naber, SA Nabersa — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 March 2003 (Case R 620/2001-4) in so far as it upholds the opposition of the proprietor of the Spanish word mark NABER; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 March 2003 (Case R 620/2001-4) in so far as it upholds the opposition of the proprietor of the Spanish word mark NABER;

| 2. | Orders the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the defendant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.

1

---