alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40936.

#### HOWINGTON v. THE STATE.

Decided September 22, 1964

Rehearing denied October 9, 1964.

*453
      *E. C. Stark, Marshall L, Allison,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cíete D. Johnson, Solicitor General, William Hall,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

1. This evidence does not present a case in which the defendant’s guilt was wholly dependent upon the inference arising from the defendant’s possession of the stolen property shortly after the larceny, and the possession, as a matter of law, was explained by unimpeached, uncontradicted and undiscredited testimony, and there was no circumstance to supply a reason why the jury did not believe the explanation of possession offered by the defendant. The conflict between the defendant’s first statement that he acquired the property from unknown persons whom he had never seen before, and his later statements *454before the trial and his statement and the testimony of his witnesses at the trial, and the other circumstances in evidence, authorized the jury to find that the defendant’s explanation of his possession of the stolen property was not satisfactory. *Stewart v. State,*17 Ga. App. 827 (88 SE 715); *Tate v. State,*47 Ga. App. 784, 786 (171 SE 557); *Moxley v. State,*62 Ga. App. 512, 514 (8 SE2d 699); *Parker v. State,*63 Ga. App. 249 (10 SE2d 720). Accord *Gibbs v. State,*8 Ga. App. 107, 108 (68 SE 742); 52 CJS 935, § 110.

2. The trial court’s charge on the subject of admissions by a criminal defendant was not error. *Timbs v. State,*71 Ga. App. 141 (30 SE2d 290).

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
# North Macedonia

112 items

        -    Report  		Macedonia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Macedonia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Macedonia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Macedonia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (13-705) – Air Transport Agreement	  July 5, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (10-712) – Agreement Concerning the Protection and Preservation of Certain Cultural Properties	  July 12, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (08-714) – Agreement for Scientific and Technical Cooperation	  July 14, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Macedonia (03-1112) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  November 12, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (01-909) – Agreement Concerning Economic, Technical and Related Assistance	  September 9, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (13011) – Agreement Concerning the Reciprocal Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  December 10, 1998 

previous page1…9101112next page

Back to Top
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3055

AN ACT

To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act

the grant program authorized by that section.torically Black Graduate Professional Schools inof 1965 to permit continued participation by His-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3055

AN ACT

To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965

to permit continued participation by Historically Black

Graduate Professional Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3055 EH

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds the following:

3 (1) The Historically Black Graduate Profes4 sional Schools identified under section 326 of the

5 Higher Education Act may receive grant funds if the

6 Secretary of Education determines that such institu7 tions make a substantial contribution to the legal,

8 medical, dental, veterinary, or other graduate oppor9 tunity for African Americans.

10 (2) The health professions schools which par11 ticipate under section 326 train 50 percent of the

12 Nation’s African American physicians, 50 percent of

13 the Nation’s African American dentists, 50 percent

14 of the Nation’s African American pharmacists, and

15 75 percent of the Nation’s African American veteri16 narians.

17 (3) A majority of the graduates of these schools

18 practice in poor urban and rural areas of the coun19 try providing care to many disadvantaged Ameri20 cans.

21 (4) The survival of these schools will contribute

22 to the improved health status of disadvantaged per23 sons, and of all Americans.
3

•HR 3055 EH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GRANT RENEWAL LIMITATION.

2 Section 326(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

3 (20 U.S.C. 1063b(b)) is amended by striking the second

4 sentence.

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.7


 


Roth CH Acquisition I Co.


888 San Clemente Drive, Suite 400


Newport Beach, CA 92660


  


 


February 22, 2021


 


This letter is to confirm
the undersigned’s commitment that, through November 7, 2021, the scheduled liquidation date, if funds are needed by Roth
CH Acquisition I Co. (the “Company”) and upon request by the Company, the undersigned will provide loans of up to
an aggregate of $750,000 to the Company. These loans will be non-interest bearing, unsecured and will be repaid upon the consummation
of a business combination. The undersigned understands that if the Company does not consummate a business combination (as described
in the Company’s prospectus, dated May 6, 2020), all amounts loaned to the Company hereunder will be forgiven except to
the extent that the Company has funds available to it outside of its trust account established in connection with the Company’s
initial public offering.


 


  


 


/s/Gerald Mars





 



Gerald Mars, CFO


CR Financial Holdings, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of PHI Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry D. Fahman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Henry Fahman

Henry Fahman

Acting Principal Financial Officer

October 08, 2010             

 

 

----
#### § 37.20 Miner identification document.

As part of the examination, a Miner Identification Document (CDC/NIOSH (M)2.9) which includes an occupational history questionnaire must be completed for each miner at the facility where the examination is made (this document is required for both radiographic and spirometry examinations conducted pursuant to this part).

[81 FR 73282, Oct. 24, 2016]
§ 1003.720 Determinations regarding the amount of penalties and assessments and period of exclusion. In considering the factors listed in § 1003.140: ( a ) It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if all the violations included in the action brought under this part were of the same type and occurred within a short period of time, there were few such violations, and the total amount claimed or requested related to the violations was less than $5,000.
( b ) Aggravating circumstances include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) The violations were of several types or occurred over a lengthy period of time;
( 2 ) There were many such violations (or the nature and circumstances indicate a pattern of false or fraudulent specified claims, requests for payment, or a pattern of violations);
( 3 ) The amount requested or claimed or related to the violations was $50,000 or more; or
( 4 ) The violation resulted, or could have resulted, in physical harm to any individual.
#### § 137.77 When must the Secretary transfer funds that were not paid as part of the initial lump sum payment?

The Secretary must transfer any funds that were not paid in the initial lump sum payment within 10 days after distribution methodologies and other decisions regarding payment of those funds have been made by the IHS.
HomeMali

# Mali

93 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Key Outcomes at the 46th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  March 24, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 19, 2021WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale’s Remarks to the International Coalition for the Sahel Ministerial	  David HaleMarch 19, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Announces Humanitarian Assistance for the Sahel Crisis Response	  Ned PriceMarch 19, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY20 DRL Security and Human Rights Request for Statements of Interest: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Mali, Nigeria	  December 2, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Mali	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mali	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Mali	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mali	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mali	  March 11, 2020 

previous page1…5678910next page

Back to Top
§ 405.982 Notice of a revised determination or decision. ( a ) *When adjudicators initiate reopenings.* When any determination or decision is reopened and revised as provided in § 405.980, the contractor, QIC, ALJ or attorney adjudicator, or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the parties to that determination or decision at their last known address. In the case of a full or partial reversal resulting in issuance of a payment to a provider or supplier, a revised electronic or paper remittance advice notice must be issued by the Medicare contractor. An adverse revised determination or decision must state the rationale and basis for the reopening and revision and any right to appeal.
( b ) *Reopenings initiated at the request of a party.* The contractor, QIC, ALJ or attorney adjudicator, or the Council must mail its revised determination or decision to the parties to that determination or decision at their last known address. In the case of a full or partial reversal resulting in issuance of a payment to a provider or supplier, a revised electronic or paper remittance advice notice must be issued by the Medicare contractor. An adverse revised determination or decision must state the rationale and basis for the reopening and revision and any right to appeal.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5108, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### Lackawaxen Turnpike Co. *v.*The Commonwealth.

Where the form of proceedings to compel a turnpike company to keep its road in repair, is prescribed in the act of incorporation, by reference to another act of Assembly — they are not affected by a subsequent repeal of the act referred to. Nor by an alteration made in the form of proceedings by an act of Assembly, passed after judgment obtained in the proceedings under the old form.

Certiorari to Wayne county.

*July*12.

This was a proceeding by an inquest, before a justice of the peace, to inquire whether the road of the Turnpike Company, *21defendants, was out of repair. The only material question was, ■whether the form of proceeding had been altered by act of Assembly.

The act of 1804, incorporating the Coshecton Turnpike Company, directed the form of proceedings in such a case.

The act of 1828, p. 17, incorporating the defendants, made them liable to the duties and penalties provided in the act of 1804, by a reference thereto. The act of 1830, p. 319, repealed the act of 1804, and directed a new form for proceeding against the Coshecton Company.

The present proceeding was perfected by the inquisition in December, 1847. A certiorari was then issued. The act of 1848, p. 437, repealed the act of 1828, and supplied a new form of proceeding.

The question was, whether the proceedings were *coram nonjudiee.*

Wheeler, for plaintiff in error.

Gollins, contó.

Per Curiam.

The proceedings in this case are a virtual compliance with the act of incorporation, which was not affected by subsequent alterations of other acts which had become part of it by reference. The whole road is within the county of Wayne, and the parts of it out of repair are sufficiently specified.

Proceedings affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the General Counsel

      ( print page 45672)    
Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Chairperson, Christopher Sterner, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel (Operations);

2. Roland Barral, Area Counsel (Large and Mid-Size Business);

3. Sara M. Coe, Deputy Division Counsel (Small Business/Self Employed);

4. Alan Tawshunsky, Deputy Division Counsel/Deputy Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities);

5. Deborah A. Butler, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

Dated: August 20, 2009.

William J. Wilkins,

Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. E9-21259 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3029

To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of

Columbia, as the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1996

Mr. DAVIS (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse in Washington,

District of Columbia, as the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

4 The United States courthouse located at 3rd Street

5 and Constitution Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, Dis6 trict of Columbia, shall be designated and known as the

7 ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•HR 3029 IH

1 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United

3 States Courthouse’’.

Æ
§ 124.505 Eligibility criteria. ( a ) A person unable to pay for health services is a person who— ( 1 ) Is not covered, or receives services not covered, under a third-party insurer or governmental program, except where the person is not covered because the facility fails to participate in a program in which it is required to participate by § 124.603(c);
( 2 ) Falls into one of the following categories: ( i ) *Category A* —A person whose annual individual or family income, as applicable, is not greater than the current poverty line issued by the Secretary pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9902 that applies to the individual or family. The facility shall provide uncompensated services to persons in Category A without charge.
( ii ) *Category B* —A person whose annual individual or family income, as applicable, is greater than but not more than twice the poverty line issued by the Secretary pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9902 that applies to the individual or family. If persons in Category B are included in the allocation plan, the facility shall provide uncompensated services to these persons without charge, or in accordance with a schedule of charges as specified in the allocation plan.
( iii ) *Category C* —With respect only to persons seeking or receiving nursing home services, a person whose annual or family income, as applicable, is more than twice but not greater than three times the poverty line issued by the Secretary pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9902 that applies to the individual or family. If persons in Category C are included in the allocation plan, the facility shall provide uncompensated services to these persons without charge, or in accordance with a schedule of charges as specified in the allocation plan; and
( 3 ) Requests services within the facility's allocation plan in effect at the time of the request.
( b ) For purposes of determining eligibility for uncompensated services, revisions of the poverty line are effective 60 days from the date of their publication in the Federal Register.
( c ) A person is eligible for uncompensated services if the person's individual or family annual income, as applicable, is at or below the level established under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, when calculated by either of the following methods: ( 1 ) Multiplying by four the person's or family's income, as applicable, for the three months preceding the request for uncompensated services;
( 2 ) Using the person's or family's income, as applicable, for the twelve months preceding the request for uncompensated services.
[52 FR 46031, Dec. 3, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 16756, Mar. 31, 1995]
§ 403.754 Monitoring expenditure level. ( a ) *Tracking expenditures.* Starting in FFY 1999 CMS begins monitoring Medicare payments to RNHCIs.
( b ) *Carry forward.* The difference between the trigger level and Medicare expenditures for a FFY results in a carry forward that either increases or decreases the unadjusted trigger level described in § 403.750(d). In no case may the carry forward exceed $50,000,000 for an FFY.
ex_232213.htm


Exhibit 10.4.7


 


ASENSUS SURGICAL, INC.

STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE


 


 


	Date of Issuance: 	 	[___________]
	 	 	 
	Issuer:	 	Asensus Surgical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
	 	 	 
	Awardee: 	 	_________________________
	 	 	 
	Plan:	 	Shares are issued under the Asensus Surgical, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan of the Company (the “Plan”)
	 	 	 
	Number of Shares: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Reason for Issuance:	 	Payment of quarterly stock in lieu of cash retainer to non-employee director.
	 	 	 
	Restrictions: 	 	None
	 	 	 
	Issuance of Certificate:	 	The Shares can be issued in book-entry form or certificated.
	 	 	 
	Transferability:	 	The Awardee is informed that, under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), if the Awardee sells or transfers the Shares for value within six (6) months after the Date of Issuance the Awardee may become liable under the strict liability provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
	 	 	 
	Taxation:	 	The issuance of the Shares is a taxable transaction to the Awardee as of the date of issuance. The Awardee is responsible for all taxes that arise.
§ 137.407 What guidelines will be used by the Secretary to compile information required for the report? The report shall be compiled from information contained in funding agreements, annual audit reports, and data of the Secretary regarding the disposition of Federal funds. The report must identify: ( a ) The relative costs and benefits of self-governance, including savings;
( b ) With particularity, all funds that are specifically or functionally related to the provision by the Secretary of services and benefits to Self-Governance Tribes and their members;
( c ) The funds transferred to each Self-Governance Tribe and the corresponding reduction in the Federal bureaucracy;
( d ) The funding formula for individual Tribal shares of all headquarters' funds, together with the comments of affected Self-Governance Tribes, developed under § 137.405 of this subpart; and
( e ) Amounts expended in the preceding fiscal year to carry out inherent Federal functions, including an identification of those functions by type and location.
<TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.0

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<CAPTION>
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>
                                              1997        1996        1995

Numerator:
 Net income                               $1,703,535  $1,073,873  ($5,673,647)
 Preferred stock dividend requirement      ($282,828)  ($289,290) $   365,865

 Numerator for basic earnings per share--
  income available to common shareholders $1,420,707  $  784,583  ($5,307,782)

 Effect of dilutive securities:                    -           -            -

 Numerator for diluted earnings per
 share--
  income available to common stockholders
  after assumed conversions                1,420,707     784,583   (5,307,782)



Denominator:
 Denominator for basic earnings per
 share--
  weighted average shares outstanding      7,793,905   7,785,973    7,687,249

 Effect of dilutive securities:
  Employee stock options                     101,034      46,644            0
 Dilutive potential common shares
  Denominator for diluted earnings per
  share--
   adjusted weighted average shares and
   assumed conversions                     7,894,939   7,832,617    7,687,249


Basic earnings per share                  $     0.18  $     0.10  $     (0.69)



Diluted earnings per share                $     0.18  $     0.10  $     (0.69)




</TABLE>