alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005217EN.01001402.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 26 May 2005

in Case C-465/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz Kretztechnik AG v Finanzamt Linz (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Supplies for consideration - Share issue - Admission of a company to a stock exchange - Deductibility of VAT)

(2005/C 217/27)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-465/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz (Austria), made by decision of 20 October 2003, received at the Court on 5 November 2003, in the proceedings between Kretztechnik AG and Finanzamt Linz, the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič and E. Levits, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 26 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | A new share issue does not constitute a transaction falling within the scope of Article 2(1) of Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995. |
| --- | --- |

1.

A new share issue does not constitute a transaction falling within the scope of Article 2(1) of Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995.

| 2. | Article 17(1) and (2) of Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 95/7, confer the right to deduct in its entirety the VAT charged on the expenses incurred by a taxable person for the various supplies acquired by him in connection with a share issue, provided that all the transactions undertaken by the taxable person in the context of his economic activity constitute taxed transactions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 17(1) and (2) of Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 95/7, confer the right to deduct in its entirety the VAT charged on the expenses incurred by a taxable person for the various supplies acquired by him in connection with a share issue, provided that all the transactions undertaken by the taxable person in the context of his economic activity constitute taxed transactions.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.02.2004.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.43 Beneficiary's responsibility with respect to workers' compensation. ( a ) The beneficiary is responsible for taking whatever action is necessary to obtain any payment that can reasonably be expected under workers' compensation.
( b ) Except as specified in § 411.45(a), Medicare does not pay until the beneficiary has exhausted his or her remedies under workers' compensation.
( c ) Except as specified in § 411.45(b), Medicare does not pay for services that would have been covered under workers' compensation if the beneficiary had filed a proper claim.
( d ) However, if a claim is denied for reasons other than not being a proper claim, Medicare pays for the services if they are covered under Medicare.
#### § 2.20 Relationship to state laws.

The statute authorizing the regulations in this part (42 U.S.C. 290dd-2) does not preempt the field of law which they cover to the exclusion of all state laws in that field. If a use or disclosure permitted under the regulations in this part is prohibited under state law, neither the regulations in this part nor the authorizing statute may be construed to authorize any violation of that state law. However, no state law may either authorize or compel any use or disclosure prohibited by the regulations in this part.

[89 FR 12623, Feb. 16, 2024]
# C_2005315EN.01000701.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 20 October 2005

in Case C-505/04: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/19/EC - Mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other qualifications - Nurse, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed - Gibraltar)

(2005/C 315/12)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-505/04, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: H. Støvlbæk) v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: S. Nwaokolo) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 8 December 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of J.-P. Puissochet, acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 20 October 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, so far as Gibraltar is concerned, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the recognition of professional qualifications and Council Directives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC, 78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC, 85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, so far as Gibraltar is concerned, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the recognition of professional qualifications and Council Directives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC, 78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC, 85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 05.02.2005.

1

---
Home1997 Treaties and Agreements...Canada (97-731) – Agreement for Space Cooperation

# 									Canada (97-731) – Agreement for Space Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 31, 1997

Space:  Cooperation

**Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Ottawa July 31, 1997; entered into force July 31, 1997. With attachment.
Download Agreements						 [5 MB]

Tags

CanadaTreaties

Back to Top
HomeSingapore

# Singapore

117 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Artificial Intelligence for Accelerating Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: Addressing Society’s Greatest Challenges	  September 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Congratulations to the New President of Singapore Tharman Shanmugaratnam	  Matthew MillerSeptember 1, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with David M. Turk, U.S. Department of Energy	  August 24, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Singapore National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 8, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		With Singaporean Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 16, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Strengthening the United States-Singapore Climate Partnership	  June 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Singapore	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Philippines, Singapore, and Indonesia	  May 26, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Connecting Americans to the Asia-Pacific Through ‘APEC Connect’	  Matt MurrayMay 16, 2023 

previous page12345…12next page

Back to Top
HomeYemen

# Yemen

314 items

        -    Press Statement  		Houthi Attacks on Saudi Arabia	  Ned PriceFebruary 28, 2021 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken to Participate in the 2021 High-Level Pledging Event for the Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen	  February 26, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 25, 2021	  February 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 24, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 24, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 22, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 22, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to the Arabian Peninsula	  February 22, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 17, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 17, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 16, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 16, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The Houthis Must Cease the Assault on Marib	  Ned PriceFebruary 16, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 12, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 12, 2021 

previous page1…2526272829…32next page

Back to Top
§ 402.11 Notice to other agencies and other entities. ( a ) Whenever a penalty, assessment, or exclusion becomes final, CMS or OIG notifies the following organizations and entities about the action and the reasons for it: ( 1 ) The appropriate State or local medical or professional association.
( 2 ) The appropriate quality improvement organization.
( 3 ) As appropriate, the State agency responsible for the administration of each State health care program (Medicaid, the Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Program, and the Social Services Block Grant Program).
( 4 ) The appropriate Medicare carrier or fiscal intermediary.
( 5 ) The appropriate State or local licensing agency or organization (including the Medicare and Medicaid State survey agencies).
( 6 ) The long-term care ombudsman.
( b ) For exclusions, CMS or OIG also notifies the public and specifies the effective date.
§ 31.4 Use of other than Service facilities. ( a ) When a person specified in § 31.2 who is on active duty requires immediate medical, surgical, or dental treatment or hospitalization and the urgency of the situation does not permit treatment at a medical relief station or by a designated physician or designated dentist, an officer of the same service as the patient may arrange for treatment or hospitalization at the expense of the Service.
( b ) When the circumstances are such that an officer of the same service as the patient is not available to make the necessary arrangements, the treatment or hospitalization may be obtained by or on behalf of the patient at the expense of the Service.
( c ) In every case of treatment or hospitalization as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the responsible superior officer of the patient shall be notified as promptly as possible and a full report shall be submitted by such officer to the Surgeon General through appropriate official channels. As soon as practicable, unless the interests of the patient or the Government require otherwise, treatment or hospitalization shall be continued at a medical relief station or by a designated physician or designated dentist or at another appropriate Federal medical facility.
( d ) When the necessary medical relief cannot be obtained from a medical relief station or a designated physician or designated dentist, preference shall be given to other Federal medical facilities when reasonably available and when conditions permit.
( e ) Vouchers on proper forms covering expenses for treatment or hospitalization under the circumstances specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be forwarded to the Surgeon General through appropriate official channels. Each such voucher shall be accompanied by or contain a statement of the facts necessitating the treatment or hospitalization. Unreasonable charges for emergency treatment or hospitalization will not be allowed.
( f ) Expenses for consultants or special services, or for dental treatment other than emergency measures to relieve pain, shall not be allowed except when authorized in advance by the headquarters of the Service or, in extraordinary cases, when subsequently approved by such headquarters upon receipt of report and satisfactory explanation as to the necessity and urgency therefor.
(Sec. 326, 58 Stat. 697, as amended; 42 U.S.C. 253)
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

129 items

        -    		Relief and Development Coherence	   
        -    Report  		Honduras	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (19-312) – Agreement Concerning Cultural Property Archaeological Material	  March 12, 2019 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Honduras Summary	   
        -    Report  		Honduras	  July 19, 2018 
        -    		Overseas Business Insights, July, 2018	  July 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  May 29, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (18-516) Amendment to Annex of Agreement of May 6 and May 7, 1982 Concerning Defense Cooperation	  May 16, 2018 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…910111213next page

Back to Top
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2361

_____________________________

JONATHAN LEE THOMAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

August 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2005281EN.01002103.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2005 — Cargo Partner AG v OHIM

(Case T-123/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Word sign CARGO PARTNER - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Absence of distinctive character)

(2005/C 281/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant(s): Cargo Partner AG (Fischamend, Austria) (represented by: M. Wolner, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant(s):

:

Application for

annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2004 (Case R 346/2003-1), in relation to the application for registration of the word sign CARGO PARTNER as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action.

| 2) | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 26.6.2004.

1

---
HomeAzerbaijan

# Azerbaijan

264 items

        -    Press Statement  		Fighting Between Armenia and Azerbaijan	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 16, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Recognizing the One-Year Anniversary of the Ceasefire Declaration Between Armenia and Azerbaijan	  Ned PriceNovember 8, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Hogan Meets OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs	  September 27, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Azerbaijan	  August 27, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Escalation of Violence along International Border between Armenia and Azerbaijan	  Ned PriceJuly 28, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Azerbaijan	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Azerbaijan	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Azerbaijan	  June 25, 2021 
        -    		United States Welcomes Actions by Armenia and Azerbaijan	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker’s Travel to Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia	  June 4, 2021 

previous page1…2021222324…27next page

Back to Top
#### Howard F. WILDS, Jr., Appellant, v. Virginia H. WILDS, Appellee.

No. 80-1272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1981.

Jepeway & Jepeway and Louis M. Jepe-way, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

A. M. Schwitalla, Coral Gables, and James A. White, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

It is not necessary that one spouse be completely unable to pay attorney’s fees in order to require the other spouse to pay the fees. An award of attorney’s fees may be proper to avoid an inequitable diminution of other fiscal sums granted to the wife. *Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). The record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,*377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.
§ 121.9 Designated transplant program requirements. ( a ) To receive organs for transplantation, a transplant program in a hospital that is a member of the OPTN shall abide by these rules and shall: ( 1 ) Be a transplant program approved by the Secretary for reimbursement under Medicare; or
( 2 ) Be an organ transplant program which has adequate resources to provide transplant services to its patients and agrees promptly to notify the OPTN and patients awaiting transplants if it becomes inactive and which: ( i ) Has letters of agreement or contracts with an OPO;
( ii ) Has on site a transplant surgeon qualified in accordance with policies developed under § 121.4;
( iii ) Has on site a transplant physician qualified in accordance with policies developed under § 121.4;
( iv ) Has available operating and recovery room resources, intensive care resources and surgical beds and transplant program personnel;
( v ) Shows evidence of collaborative involvement with experts in the fields of radiology, infectious disease, pathology, immunology, anesthesiology, physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine, histocompatibility, and immunogenetics and, as appropriate, hepatology, pediatrics, nephrology with dialysis capability, and pulmonary medicine with respiratory therapy support;
( vi ) Has immediate access to microbiology, clinical chemistry, histocompatibility testing, radiology, and blood banking services, as well as the capacity to monitor treatment with immunosuppressive drugs; and
( vii ) Makes available psychiatric and social support services for transplant candidates, transplant recipients, and their families; or
( 3 ) Be a transplant program in a Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, or other Federal hospital.
( b ) To apply to be a designated transplant program, transplant programs shall provide to the OPTN such documents as the OPTN may require which show that they meet the requirements of § 121.9(a) (1), (2), or (3).
( c ) The OPTN shall, within 90 days, accept or reject applications to be a designated transplant program.
( d ) Applicants rejected for designation may appeal to the Secretary. Appeals shall be submitted in writing within 30 days of rejection of the application. The Secretary may: ( 1 ) Deny the appeal; or
( 2 ) Direct the OPTN to take action consistent with the Secretary's response to the appeal.
[63 FR 16332, Apr. 2, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 56660, Oct. 20, 1999]
# C_2005283EN.01001701.xml

| 16.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/17

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2005/C 283/06)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the EUR 2 denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Italian Republic

Subject of commemoration: 1st anniversary of the signing of the European Constitution

st

Factual description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a representation of Europa and the bull. Europa holds a pen and the text of the European Constitution. To the upper left of the image is the mintmark ‘R’. The initials of the engraver Maria Carmela Colaneri ‘MCC’ appear at the lower left. The year of mintage appears in the top right of the illustration above the head of the bull. In the lower part of the illustration there is the monogram of the Italian Republic, ‘RI’. The words ‘COSTITUZIONE EUROPEA’ form a quasi-semicircle on the lower part of the outer ring. Twelve stars are depicted on the upper part of the outer ring.

Issue volume: 18 million coins

Approximate issue period: October 2005

Edge lettering: 2 *, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, pp. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

2

---