alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Brian Glover [bglover@environcorp.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 8:55 AM

To: Shepherd, Lorinda

Cc: Kyle Heitkamp; Michael Carbon

Subject: RE: Statoil (Discoverer Americas) EGEN and ACOMP engines

Categories: OCS

Hi Lori,

We agree you are on the right track. You are remembering our discussions correctly. We argued that

compliance with a more stringent standard such as EPA Tier 2 is an inherent part of the engine design,

and modifications or retrofits were not available or feasible (i.e. the manufacturer cannot “certify” the

engine as Tier 2 after modifications, the engine must be designed and purchased as Tier 2). Thus, to

meet Tier 2 standards, an engine would have to be replaced with a newer engine designed for the same

performance or power rating under the same operating conditions as the original engine. The challenge

with this is that the engines on these drilling vessels, such as the EGEN and ACOMPs on the Discoverer

Americas , were sized to meet vessel space and wei ght distribution requirements during the initial design

phase of the vessel. Replacement of these engines would require a redesign of the footprint or frame

for the engine, and could also require modifications to the structural supports of the drilling ve ssel. We

believe these significant modifications to be technically infeasible.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,

Brian

From: Shepherd, Lorinda [ mailto:Shepherd.Lorinda@epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:31 PM

To: Michael Carbon

Cc: Brian Glover; Kyle Heitkamp

Subject: Statoil (Discoverer Americas) EGEN and ACOMP engines

I am trying to remember back to our conference call in March where we discussed the technical

problems associa ted with locating replacement engines for anything that was installed as part of the

ship’s original design. I recall that we were discussing the engines’ individual footprints, and I seem to

remember someone saying that you had been looking at available e ngines and none of them had fit the

specifications. Unfortunately, I don’t have that in my notes. Can you confirm this? Or, tell me I am

imagining things? Would that be the case for both the EGEN and the ACOMPs?

Thanks,

Lori Shepherd

Environmental Scien tist

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

61 Forsyth Street

Atlanta, GA 30303

(404) 562

- 8435

### This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or ot herwise protected by

law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the

addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose

to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in

error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately

delete all copies of the message.
# South Sudan

80 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: South Sudan	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Announces $245 Million in Humanitarian Assistance to Sudan and Neighboring Countries	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 23, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: South Sudan	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And UN Secretary-General António Guterres Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2023Treaty Room 
        -    		United States Policy Toward South Sudan	  April 7, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Outcomes of the 52nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  April 5, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: South Sudan	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		Biological Weapons Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; South Sudan, February 15, 2023	   
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in South Sudan	  January 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Violence in Upper Nile and Jonglei States, South Sudan	  December 16, 2022 

previous page12345…8next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43703-43704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 43704]]


    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; RFA AT09-003 Tools for 
assessing manual therapies (SBIR).
    Date: September 23, 2009.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Ray Bramhall, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#335141525e5b525f5f41735e525a5f1d5d5a5b1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4e5e4d41444d40405e6c414d454002424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20629 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2861 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2861

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude long-term capital 
                        gains from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1996

  Mr. Dreier (for himself, Mr. Tauzin, and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude long-term capital 
                        gains from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Sector Job Creation and 
Economic Growth Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAINS.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 137 as section 
138 and by inserting after section 136 the following new section:

``SEC. 137. 100 PERCENT EXCLUSION FOR LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN.

    ``Gross income shall not include 100 percent of any long-term 
capital gain recognized on the sale or exchange of any property.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part III is 
amended by striking the last item and inserting the following new 
items:

                              ``Sec. 137. 100 percent exclusion for 
                                        long-term capital gain.
                              ``Sec. 138. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales and exchanges occurring after December 31, 1994, in 
taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3.538 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing must be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony of witnesses other than the testimony of expert witnesses may be admitted in the form of a written statement. The ALJ may, at his or her discretion, admit prior sworn testimony of experts that has been subject to adverse examination, such as a deposition or trial testimony. Any such written statement must be provided to the other party, along with the last known address of the witness, in a manner that allows sufficient time for the other party to subpoena the witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing must be exchanged as provided in § 3.518.
( c ) The ALJ must exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
( 2 ) Avoid repetition or needless consumption of time; and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ must permit the parties to conduct cross-examination of witnesses as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) The ALJ may order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, except that the ALJ may not order to be excluded— ( 1 ) A party who is a natural person;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not a natural person, the officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated as the party's representative; or
( 3 ) A natural person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including a person engaged in assisting the attorney for the Secretary.
# Taiwan

152 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 06, 2024	  Matthew MillerJune 6, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 28, 2024	  Matthew MillerMay 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		China Coordinator Mark B. Lambert’s Virtual Meeting with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director-General for Boundary and Ocean Affairs Hong Liang	  May 27, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		PRC Military Drills near Taiwan	  Matthew MillerMay 25, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Taiwan as an Observer at the 77th World Health Assembly	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 1, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Taiwan	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior State Department Official Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to the People’s Republic of China	  April 20, 2024April 19, 2024Via Teleconference 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Taipei, Taiwan: Taipei American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Kaohsiung American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 

123…16next page

Back to Top
#### § 583.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
ACCEPTED

01-14-00872-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/3/2015 2:42:00 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/3/2015 2:42:00 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
# C_2005330EN.01000302.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-387/03: Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Clearance of accounts - Financial years 1999 and 2000 - Decision 2003/536/EC - Wine, olive oil, beef and veal and sheepmeat)

(2005/C 330/06)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-387/03 Hellenic Republic (Agents: I. Chalkias and E. Svolopoulou) v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Condou-Durande, assisted by N. Korogiannakis) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 15 September 2003 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, acting as President of the Fourth Chamber (Rapporteur), E. Juhász and M. Ilešič, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Assistant Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, in which it:

Hellenic Republic

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264, 1.11.2003.

1

---
www.womenshealth.va.gov

09/2012 

Poster 10-392

Early Detection 

Saves Lives

Let VA help.
----

Action brought on 1 July 2005 by Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, SA against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-251/05)

(2005/C 217/107)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 July 2005 by Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, SA, established in Lisbon, represented by C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

Infringement of essential procedural requirements in that the Commission's decision procedure does not satisfy the formal requirements and in that insufficient justification is provided for the contested decision;

Infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations, inasmuch as the contested decision is, to the applicant's detriment, at variance with the earlier act attesting to the factual and accounting accuracy of the documents produced by the applicant with its request for payment of the balance certified by it;

Manifest error in the assessment of the documentary evidence of expenditure produced by Mediocurso; and

Infringement of the principle of proportionality, with regard to the grounds of fact and law put forward in support of the reduction of assistance which is the subject-matter of the contested decision.

----
# Mozambique

94 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Mozambique	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Mozambique	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Maputo, Mozambique: The American International School of Mozambique: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Mozambique	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Mozambique National Day	  June 25, 2023 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		PEPFAR, Global Fund and UNAIDS Leaders Visit Mozambique in Support of a Sustainable HIV/AIDS Response	  June 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mozambique	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mozambique	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint 10-Year Plans for the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  March 27, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
HomeLebanon

# Lebanon

239 items

        -    Press Statement  		40th Anniversary of the Beirut Marine Corps Barracks Bombing	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 23, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 23, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Lebanese Caretaker Prime Minister Mikati	  October 21, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Dana Bash of CNN’s State of the Union	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 8, 2023Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 28, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 28, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Hizballah Operatives and Financial Facilitators in South America and Lebanon	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Tim Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  August 23, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Dermer	  August 17, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Counter Terrorism Designations of One Hizballah Affiliated Entity and Its Leader	  Matthew MillerAugust 16, 2023 

previous page12345…24next page

Back to Top
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4271

_____________________________

DONALD L. GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

September 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Donald L. Green, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6754]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Playing with Pictures: The Art of Victorian Photocollage,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or about October 10, 2009, until on or about January 3, 2010, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 2, 2010, until on or about May 9, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

      ( print page 45669)    
Dated: August 28, 2009.

Maura M. Pally,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-21316 Filed 9-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Jimmy COBB v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51856.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 21, 1980.

G. William McCarthy, Jr., Biloxi, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Catherine Walker Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; J. Ruble Griffin, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
# C_2005270EN.01004602.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/46

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3933 — Deutsche Bank/Hardt/Trafalgar/Kunert)

(2005/C 270/18)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3933. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3933. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 1005.10 Fees.

The party requesting a subpoena will pay the cost of the fees and mileage of any witness subpoenaed in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in United States District Court. A check for witness fees and mileage will accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of the IG, a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.