alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 136.404 What does the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act require of the IHS and Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations receiving funds under the ISDEA? ( a ) The IHS must compile a list of all authorized positions with duties and responsibilities that involve regular contact with or control over Indian children; investigate the character of each individual who is employed or is being considered for employment in such a position; and prescribe minimum standards of character that each individual must meet to be appointed or employed in such positions.
( b ) All Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations receiving funds under the authority of the ISDEA must identify those positions that permit regular contact with or control over Indian children; conduct an investigation of the character of each individual who is employed or is being considered for employment in a position that involves regular contact with or control over Indian children; and employ only individuals who meet standards of character that are no less stringent than those prescribed by regulations in this subpart.
#### § 21.58 Physical examination for reappointment.

Every officer of the Reserve Corps being considered for reappointment shall undergo such physical examination as the Surgeon General may direct. An officer on active duty may be recommended for reappointment unless he is found to have a physical disability which is determined to render him physically unfit to perform the duties of his office under section 402 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, as amended. An officer may be recommended for promotion only if he meets the physical qualifications for original appointment. If an officer is not available to be physically examined because of circumstances which make it impracticable for the Service to require such examination, he may, in the discretion of the Surgeon General, be reappointed without such examination, but shall be examined as soon thereafter as practicable and his physical qualification or disqualification for continued or future active service shall be determined on the same basis as if the physical examination had been given prior to reappointment.
§ 589.203 Prohibited transactions with respect to financing activities in the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy (Directive 2). The following activities by a U.S. person or within the United States are prohibited: ( a ) For new debt issued on or after July 16, 2014 and before November 28, 2017, all transactions in, provision of financing for, and other dealings in new debt of longer than 90 days maturity of persons determined to be subject to this section, their property, or their interests in property; and
( b ) For new debt issued on or after November 28, 2017, all transactions in, provision of financing for, and other dealings in new debt of longer than 60 days maturity of persons determined to be subject to this section, their property, or their interests in property.
Note 1 to § 589.203 :
The names of persons subject to this section (and earlier versions of Directive 2) are published in the Federal Register and incorporated into OFAC's Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List (SSI List) with the descriptive text “Executive Order 13662 Directive Determination—Subject to Directive 2.” Certain transactions with persons subject to this section may result in the imposition of secondary sanctions, and therefore such persons' entries on the SSI List will also include the descriptive prefix text “Secondary sanctions risk:”, followed by information about the applicable secondary sanctions authority. The SSI List is accessible through the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac . See* § 589.411 concerning entities that may not be listed on the SSI List but whose property and interests in property are nevertheless subject to the prohibitions in this section.
Note 2 to § 589.203 :
Section 216 of CAATSA (22 U.S.C. 9511) requires Congressional review prior to the termination of sanctions imposed pursuant to E.O. 13662. Section 222 of CAATSA (22 U.S.C. 9522) describes the Congressional notification required prior to the termination of sanctions imposed pursuant to E.O. 13662.
§ 589.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note 1 to § 589.504 :
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 589.211 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
# Slovenia

76 items

        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Slovenia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Slovenia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Slovenia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Slovenia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		North Macedonia Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Albania and Slovenia, April 10, 2019	   
        -    Report  		Slovenia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Slovenia	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Mihael Karner — New Target	  May 31, 2019 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Alenka Karner — New Target	  May 31, 2019 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Matevz Karner — New Target	  May 31, 2019 

previous page1…345678next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2914

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify the authority of

the Secretary of Education with respect to eligibility standards for short

term educational programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1996

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify

the authority of the Secretary of Education with respect

to eligibility standards for short term educational programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS: PLACEMENT RATES.

4 Section 481(e)(2) of the Higher Education Act of

5 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(e)(2)) is amended by adding at the

6 end the following new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(C) In prescribing regulations pursuant to subpara8 graph (A)(ii), the Secretary shall provide for the exclusion
2

•HR 2914 IH

1 from the calculation of placement rates, graduates who are

2 (i) aliens not authorized to accept employment in the Unit3 ed States, (ii) individuals with medical conditions preclud4 ing employment, and (iii) individuals who transfer credits

5 from the program to the program of an accredited degree6 granting institution or who otherwise immediately enroll

7 in such a program.’’.

Æ
#### § 137.435 Will an appeal adversely affect the Indian Tribe's rights in other compact, funding negotiations, or construction project agreement?

No, a pending appeal will not adversely affect or prevent the negotiation or award of another compact, funding agreement, or construction project agreement.
# C_2005296EN.01001701.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/17

---

Action brought on 27 September 2005 by Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-364/05)

(2005/C 296/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Michel van Beek, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that the Kingdom of the Netherlands,
  by failing to adopt the legislative and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use
  by failing to adopt the legislative and administrative measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/94/EC (2) of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products for human use
  or in any event by failing to notify such measures to the Commission
  has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Kingdom of the Netherlands,

by failing to adopt the legislative and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use

1

by failing to adopt the legislative and administrative measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/94/EC (2) of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products for human use

2

or in any event by failing to notify such measures to the Commission

has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives;

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

The first paragraph of Article 22 of Directive 2001/20 provides that Member States are to bring the necessary legislative and administrative measures for complying with the directive into force by 1 May 2003 and inform the Commission accordingly. In the case of Directive 2003/94, Article 17 sets the deadline at 30 April 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 121, p. 34.

1

(2)  OJ 2003 L 262, p. 22.

2

---
# Palestinian Territories

506 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Palestinian Authority President Abbas	  April 1, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Nomination of a New Palestinian Authority Cabinet     	  Matthew MillerMarch 29, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 28, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Gallant	  March 25, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 25, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 25, 2024Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Abstention from UN Security Council Resolution on Gaza	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the PressMarch 22, 2024Tel Aviv, Israel 

previous page1…56789…51next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated
February 5, 2002 with respect to the financial statements of Datakey, Inc. (the
"Company") included in this Form 10-KSB into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-64470, No. 33-14144, No. 33-47068,
No. 33-67280, No. 333-11405, No. 33-80894, No. 333-43937, No. 333-83999 and
333-39556 and on Form S-3 No. 333-58770, No. 333-56711, No. 333-84007, No.
333-91779, No. 333-90969, No. 333-94087 and No. 333-33332.


                                                  /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 2002
# C_2005281EN.01002702.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/27

---

Action brought on 11 August 2005 — Thierry v Commission

(Case T-327/05)

(2005/C 281/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Michel Thierry (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the list of officials promoted in 2004 in so far as that list does not include the applicant's name and, indirectly, the preparatory measures for that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the list of officials promoted in 2004 in so far as that list does not include the applicant's name and, indirectly, the preparatory measures for that decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By his action, the applicant challenges the decision of the Commission not to promote him to Grade A5 in 2004. He submits that the new system of promotion based on priority points attributed to the official, applied by the Commission in the present case, places too much weight on seniority as the promotion criterion. Therefore, the applicant considers that, in his case, there was no consideration of the comparative merits in breach of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, of the general provisions implementing that article, of the Administrative Guide on appraisal and promotion and of the principle of equality. On the same basis, he also alleges a breach of the principle precluding arbitrary proceedings, of the duty to state reasons, of legitimate expectations, of the ‘patere legem quam ipse fecisti’ rule and abuse of power.

---
August 27, 2015

Mr. Harrison Hummel

SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.

812 W. Wabash Ave.

Eureka, CA 95501

Dear Mr. Hummel :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 119.121, 91.151(a),

91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) a nd (b) , and part 21 of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 29, 2015, exemption request on behalf of SHN Consulting Engineers

& Geologists, Inc. filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2349 , but we are unable to process your

request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the requ est any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
September 3, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
September 3, 2009 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive 
actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and 
other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 27, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21166 Filed 8-28-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1998
[CASH]                                            5104
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                      29425
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                 39148
[PP&E]                                          333325
[DEPRECIATION]                                  126352
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 7016693
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                            45847
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                         70
[COMMON]                                         10280
[OTHER-SE]                                     6960496
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   7016693
[SALES]                                          10224
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                 10224
[CGS]                                            90998
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                    90998
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (90794)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (90794)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (90794)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                (10020)
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (90794)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
# Palestinian Territories

483 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 7, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 7, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 5, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 5, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 4, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 4, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 29, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 29, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 23, 2021	  Jalina PorterApril 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 21, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 21, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 9, 2021	  Jalina PorterApril 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 8, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 7, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 7, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Restores Assistance for the Palestinians	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 7, 2021 

previous page1…444546474849next page

Back to Top
Order entered November 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01041-CV

No. 05-15-01042-CV

No. 05-15-01043-CV

No. 05-15-01044-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.W., ET AL, CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. DF-10-13224-U, DF-13-18933-U, DF-14-010757-U, and DF-13-

18931-U

ORDER

We GRANT Father’s November 12, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file 

brief and Mother’s November 13, 2015 motion for additional time to file brief and ORDER 

Father’s brief tendered to the Clerk on November 16, 2015 and Mother’s brief tendered to the 

Clerk on November 13, 2015 filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief is due December 

9, 2015.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10490

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL LYNN BRASHEAR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-124-1

Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Lynn Brashear has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brashear has filed a response. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Brashear’s response

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10490

2

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.