alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2808 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2808

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
           1994 until March 31, 1996, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), as 
amended by Public Law 104-47, is amended by striking ``December 31, 
1995'' and inserting ``March 31, 1996''.
    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to January 10, 
1996, the written policy justification dated December 1, 1995, and 
submitted to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such 
Act, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) 
of such Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 802.1001 Determinations. ( a ) The Committee may determine at any time that a foreign state has made significant progress toward establishing and effectively utilizing a robust process to analyze foreign investments for national security risks and to facilitate coordination with the United States on matters relating to investment security.
( b ) The Committee may rescind a determination under paragraph (a) of this section if the Committee determines that such a rescission is appropriate.
( c ) The Chairperson of the Committee shall publish a notice of any determination or rescission of a determination under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, respectively, in the Federal Register.
Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

§ 405.1887 Notice of reopening; effect of reopening. ( a ) In exercising its reopening authority under § 405.1885, CMS (for Secretary determinations), the contractor or the reviewing entity, as applicable, must provide written notice to all parties to the determination or decision that is the subject of the reopening. Notices of— ( 1 ) Reopening by a CMS reviewing official or the Board must be sent promptly to the Administrator.
( 2 ) Contractor reopenings of determinations that are currently pending before the Board or the Administrator must meet the requirements specified in § 405.1885(c)(3) and (c)(4) of this subpart.
( b ) Upon receipt of the notice required under § 405.1887(a) of this subpart, the parties to the prior Secretary or contractor determination or decision by a reviewing entity, as applicable, must be allowed a reasonable period of time in which to present any additional evidence or argument in support of their positions.
( c ) Upon concluding its reopening, CMS, the contractor or the reviewing entity, as applicable, must provide written notice promptly to all parties to the determination or decision that is the subject of the reopening, informing the parties as to what matter(s), if any, is revised, with a complete explanation of the basis for any revision.
( d ) A reopening by itself does not extend appeal rights. Any matter that is reconsidered during the course of a reopening, but is not revised, is not within the proper scope of an appeal of a revised determination or decision (as described in § 405.1889 of this subpart).
[73 FR 30266, May 23, 2008]
#### Kenneth B. MASON, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7113.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2001.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

The court, on its own motion, determines as follows:

Kenneth Mason contests the authority of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) to enter its February 15, 2000 order remanding this dispute over attorney fees for further proceedings.

This court’s jurisdiction to review Veterans Court decisions extends only to *846final judgments. *See Johnson v. Derwinski,*949 F.2d 394 (Fed.Cir.1991). Under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule, an otherwise non-final judgment may be appealed only if: (1) the appealed order conclusively determined the question; (2) the order resolved an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action; and (3) the order would be effectively unreviewable from a final judgment in the case. *Caesar v. West,*195 F.3d 1373, 1374-75 (Fed.Cir.1999) .

The Veterans Court decision appealed by Mason in this case is an order remanding the matter for further findings and proceedings, and thus is not a final judgment appealable to this court. This case does not fall under the collateral order exception because it fails the third prong of the test above.

Mason cites several cases to suggest we have jurisdiction over this order. None of these, however, are apposite. *Maggitt v. West,*202 F.3d 1370 (Fed.Cir.2000), involves an appeal from a final decision. Similarly, in *Trent Tube Division v. Avesta Sandvik Tube AB,*975 F.2d 807 (Fed. Cir.1992), our jurisdiction was premised upon the appeal of a final decision. And in *FMC Corp. Packaging Sys. Division v. Medtronic, Inc.,*208 F.3d 445 (3d Cir.2000) , the Third Circuit explicitly based its decision to exercise jurisdiction over a district court remand order on an exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), inapplicable here, created by the Supreme Court in *Thermtron Prod., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer,*423 U.S. 336, 96 S.Ct. 584, 46 L.Ed.2d 542 (1976).

Since we lack authority to review the order appealed from in this case, we are required to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Mason’s appeal is dismissed.
F r

o m : B r i a n Sh r

a g er /R T P / U S E PA / U S T o :" H i gg i n s, C o r t n e y" < C o r t n e y

_ H i gg i n s @ o mb

. e o p

. g o

v> C c : T ere s a C l e m o n s

/R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA
, R o b e r t

J W a y l a n d / R T P / U S E PA / U S D at e : 11/ 0 2/2 0 11 1 1 : 16 A M S u b j e c t : E O 128 6

6 N E S H AP B o i l er M

a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n 2 060

_ A R13 Pr o p osa l 20

111 1 01

. d o c

C o r t n e y ,
I t h i n k t h e e x t

e n d e d f i l e n a m e c

a u s e d t h e "

. d at " e x t

e n s i o n

. H ere i s t h e s a m e f i l e w i t h a s h o r t er f i l e n a m e t h at s h o u l d n o t c a u s e p r o b l e m s

. P l e a s

e d e l e t e t h e l a s t

e -m a i l a n d u s e t h i s f

i l e m o v i n g f

o rw a r d

.
T h a n k s !

B r i a n

( S e e atta ch e d f

i l e : E O 128 6

6 N E S H A P B o i l er M

a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n 206 0

_ A R13 P r o p o s

a l 2 011 1 101

. d o c

) 

### abou t: b l a nk

P a g e 1 o f 1
# C_2005296EN.01003001.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/30

---

Action brought on 12 September 2005 — Procter & Gamble/OHIM

(Case T-347/05)

(2005/C 296/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, USA) [represented by: G. Kuipers, lawyers]

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 6 July 2005 (Case R 1182/2004-1), which was notified to P&G by letter of 13 July 2005, in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions as laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 6 July 2005 (Case R 1182/2004-1), which was notified to P&G by letter of 13 July 2005, in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions as laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94; and

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three dimensional mark in form of a square white tablet showing a green five-petalled floral design for goods in class 3 (washing and bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; preparations for the washing, cleaning and care of dishes; soaps) — application No 1 683 473

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application in respect of all the designated goods

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2005229EN.01001301.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 July 2005

in Joined Cases T-49/02 to T-51/02 Brassierie nationale SA (formerly Brasseries Funck-Bricher and Bofferding) and Others v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Cartels - Luxembourg beer market - Fines)

(2005/C 229/25)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-49/02 to T-51/02: Brassierie nationale SA (formerly Brasseries Funck-Bricher and Bofferding), established in Bascharage (Luxembourg), represented by A. Carnelutti and L. Schiltz, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, Brasserie Jules Simon et Cie SCS, established in Wiltz (Luxembourg), represented by A. Carnelutti and J. Mosar, lawyers, Brasserie Battin SNC, established in Esch-sur-Alzette (Luxembourg), represented by A. Carnelutti and M. Santini, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: W. Wils and A. Bouquet, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application, first, for annulment of Article 1 of Commission Decision 2002/759/EC of 5 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/37.800/F3 — Luxembourg Brewers) (OJ 2002 L 253, p. 21), in so far as it concerns the applicants, and, second, principally, annulment of Article 2 of that decision in so far as it imposes fines on the applicants and, in the alternative, a substantial reduction in the amount of those fines — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of A.W.H. Meij, President, N.J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109 of 4.05.2002.

1

---
HomeKazakhstan

# Kazakhstan

134 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Astana, Kazakhstan: QSI International School of Astana: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Kazakhstan’s Deputy Prime Minister-Foreign Minister Nurtleu	  March 26, 2024 
        -    Direct Line Event  		Critical Minerals and Mining Equipment in Kazakhstan	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		B5+1 Forum	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Almaty, Kazakhstan: Almaty International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Inaugural C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue among the United States and Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan	  February 9, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 2 of 2	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Accelerating Fast Mitigation: Summit on Methane and Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Kazakhstan Joint Statement on Accelerating Methane Mitigation to Achieve the Global Methane Pledge	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kazakhstan	  November 29, 2023 

123…14next page

Back to Top
§ 592.308 Participant. The term *Participant* means a state, customs territory, or regional economic integration organization identified by the Secretary of State as one for which rough diamonds are controlled through the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme. Note to § 592.308 .
The Secretary of State will periodically publish in the Federal Register an up-to-date listing of all Participants.
§ 136.313 Evaluation and grant awards. ( a ) Within the limits of funds available for such purpose, the Secretary, acting through the Service, may award health professions recruitment grants to those eligible applicants whose proposed projects will in his judgment best promote the purposes of section 102 of the Act, taking into consideration: ( 1 ) The potential effectiveness of the proposed project in carrying out such purposes;
( 2 ) The capability of the applicant to successfully conduct the project;
( 3 ) The accessibility of the applicant to target Indian communities or tribes, including evidence of past or potential cooperation between the applicant and such communities or tribes;
( 4 ) The relationship of project objectives to known or anticipated Indian health manpower deficiencies;
( 5 ) The soundness of the fiscal plan for assuring effective utilization of grant funds;
( 6 ) The completeness of the application.
( b ) Preference shall be given to applicants in the following order or priority: ( 1 ) Indian tribes,
( 2 ) tribal organizations,
( 3 ) urban Indian organizations and other Indian health organizations, and
( 4 ) public and other nonprofit profit private health or educational entities.
( c ) The Notice of Grant Awards specifies how long the Secretary intends to support the project period without requiring the project to re-compete for funds. This period, called the project period, will usually be for one to two years. The total project period comprises the original project period and any extension. Generally the grant will be for a one year budget period, any subsequent award will also be a one year budget period. A grantee must submit a separate application for each subsequent year. Decisions regarding continuation awards and the funding level of such awards will be made after consideration of such factors as the grantee's progress and management practices, and the availability of funds. In all cases, awards require a determination by the Secretary that funding is in the best interest of the Federal Government.
( d ) Neither the approval of any application nor the award of any grant commits or obligates the Federal Government in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation, or other award with respect to any approved application or portion of an approved application.
[42 FR 59646, Nov. 18, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 1855, Jan. 14, 1985]
www.gpo.gov

### §1242. Enrollment by Board; standards and qualifications; suspension or termination of enrollment

(a) The Joint Board shall, by regulations, establish reasonable standards and qualifications for persons performing actuarial services with respect to plans in which this chapter applies and, upon application by any individual, shall enroll such individual if the Joint Board finds that such individual satisfies such standards and qualifications. With respect to individuals applying for enrollment before January 1, 1976, such standards and qualifications shall include a requirement for an appropriate period of responsible actuarial experience relating to pension plans. With respect to individuals applying for enrollment on or after January 1, 1976, such standards and qualifications shall include—

(1) education and training in actuarial mathematics and methodology, as evidenced by—

(A) a degree in actuarial mathematics or its equivalent from an accredited college or university,

(B) successful completion of an examination in actuarial mathematics and methodology to be given by the Joint Board, or

(C) successful completion of other actuarial examinations deemed adequate by the Joint Board, and

(2) an appropriate period of responsible actuarial experience.

Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this subsection, the Joint Board may provide for the temporary enrollment for the period ending January 1, 1976, of actuaries under such interim standards as it deems adequate.

(b) The Joint Board may, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, suspend or terminate the enrollment of an individual under this section if the Joint Board finds that such individual—

(1) has failed to discharge his duties under this chapter, or

(2) does not satisfy the requirements for enrollment as in effect at the time of his enrollment.

The Joint Board may also, after notice and opportunity for hearing, suspend or terminate the temporary enrollment of an individual who fails to discharge his duties under this chapter or who does not satisfy the interim enrollment standards.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title III, §3042, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 1002.)

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 93–406, known as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Titles I, III, and IV of such Act are classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.
§ 405.944 Place and method of filing a request for a redetermination. ( a ) *Filing location.* The request for redetermination must be filed with the contractor indicated on the notice of initial determination.
( b ) *Content of redetermination request.* The request for redetermination must be in writing and should be made on a standard CMS form. A written request that is not made on a standard CMS form is accepted if it contains the same required elements as follows: ( 1 ) The beneficiary's name;
( 2 ) The Medicare number;
( 3 ) Specific service(s) and/or item(s) for which the redetermination is being requested and the specific date(s) of the service;
( 4 ) The name of the party or the representative of the party.
( c ) *Requests for redetermination by more than one party.* If more than one party timely files a request for redetermination on the same claim before a redetermination is made on the first timely filed request, the contractor must consolidate the separate requests into one proceeding and issue one redetermination.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 19869, May 7, 2019]
# C_2005245EN.01000301.xml

| 5.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/3

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.3796 — Omya/J.M. Huber PCC)

(2005/C 245/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 23 September 2005, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax (32-2) 296 43 01 — 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.3796 — Omya/J.M. Huber PCC, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
# C_2005182EN.01001902.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/19

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 15 March 2005

in Case C-553/03 P: Panhellenic Union of Cotton Ginners and Exporters v Commission of the European Communities and Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Action for annulment - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure)

(2005/C 182/36)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-553/03 P: Panhellenic Union of Cotton Ginners and Exporters (lawyers: K. Adamantopoulos and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert), with an address for service in Luxembourg, the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: N. Khan) and Hellenic Republic (Agents: V. Kontolaimos and I. Chalkias) — appeal pursuant to Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged on 30 December 2003 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur) and E. Juhász, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 15 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Panhellenic Union of Cotton Ginners and Exporters shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Panhellenic Union of Cotton Ginners and Exporters shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities in these proceedings.

| 3. | The Hellenic Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Hellenic Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 06.03.2004.

1

---
# Tonga

51 items

        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tonga	  April 22, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Spotlight on Embassy Nuku‘alofa, Tonga	  February 1, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Tonga National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 3, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Captain Claudine Caluori, U.S. Navy, Mission Commander of Pacific Partnership 2023	  November 3, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Peace Corps Engagement	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 26, 2023Katea Retreat Nakolo, Tonga 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the U.S. Embassy Nuku’alofa Dedication	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 26, 2023U.S. EmbassyNuku’alofa, Tonga 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Tongan Prime Minister Hu’akavameiliku at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 26, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Tongan Prime Minister Hu‘akavameiliku and Foreign Minister Utoikamanu	  July 25, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The United States-Tonga Relationship	  July 24, 2023 

123…6next page

Back to Top