alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 594.702 Prepenalty notice. ( a ) *When required.* If the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control has reasonable cause to believe that there has occurred a violation of any provision of this part or a violation of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, direction, or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Director determines that further proceedings are warranted, the Director shall notify the alleged violator of the agency's intent to impose a monetary penalty by issuing a prepenalty notice. The prepenalty notice shall be in writing. The prepenalty notice may be issued whether or not another agency has taken any action with respect to the matter.
( b ) *Contents of notice* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The prepenalty notice shall describe the violation, specify the laws and regulations allegedly violated, and state the amount of the proposed monetary penalty.
( 2 ) *Right to respond.* The prepenalty notice also shall inform the respondent of the respondent's right to make a written presentation within the applicable 30-day period set forth in § 594.703 as to why a monetary penalty should not be imposed or why, if imposed, the monetary penalty should be in a lesser amount than proposed.
( c ) *Informal settlement prior to issuance of prepenalty notice.* At any time prior to the issuance of a prepenalty notice, an alleged violator may request in writing that, for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days, the agency withhold issuance of the prepenalty notice for the exclusive purpose of effecting settlement of the agency's potential civil monetary penalty claims. In the event the Director grants the request, under terms and conditions within their discretion, the Office of Foreign Assets Control will agree to withhold issuance of the prepenalty notice for a period not to exceed 60 days and will enter into settlement negotiations of the potential civil monetary penalty claim.
[68 FR 34197, June 6, 2003, as amended at 89 FR 15743, Mar. 5, 2024]
§ 406.20 Basic requirements. ( a ) *General provisions.* Hospital insurance benefits are available to most individuals age 65 or over and to certain individuals under age 65 who do not qualify for those benefits under subpart B of this part and are willing to pay a monthly premium. This is called premium hospital insurance.
( b ) *Eligibility of individuals age 65 or over to enroll for premium hospital insurance.* Any individual is eligible to enroll for Medicare Part A if he or she— ( 1 ) Has attained age 65;
( 2 ) Is a resident of the United States and is either— ( i ) A citizen of the United States; or
( ii ) An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence who has resided in the United States continuously for the 5-year period immediately preceding the month in which he or she meets all other requirements;
( 3 ) Is not eligible for Part A benefits under subpart B of this part; and
( 4 ) Is entitled to supplementary medical insurance (Part B of Medicare) or is eligible and has enrolled for it during an enrollment period.
( c ) *Eligibility of individuals under age 65 to enroll for premium hospital insurance.* An individual who has not attained age 65 is eligible to enroll for Medicare Part A if he or she meets the following conditions: ( 1 ) Has been entitled to Medicare Part A (under § 406.12 or § 406.15) on the basis of entitlement or deemed entitlement to social security disability benefits, as provided under section 226(b) of the Act.
( 2 ) Continues to have a disabling physical or mental impairment.
( 3 ) Loses entitlement to disability benefits (and therefore also loses entitlement to Medicare Part A under § 406.12) solely because his or her earnings exceed the amount allowed under the social security regulations pertaining to “substantial gainful activity” (20 CFR 404.1571-404.1574); and
( 4 ) Is not otherwise entitled to Medicare Part A.
[56 FR 38078, Aug. 12, 1991; 56 FR 50058, Oct. 3, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2780 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2780

 To specify the circumstances in which compensation may or may not be 
 afforded to Federal and District of Columbia employees for the period 
           of a lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 1995

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Mica, and Mr. Barton 
  of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To specify the circumstances in which compensation may or may not be 
 afforded to Federal and District of Columbia employees for the period 
           of a lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY FOR FEDERAL AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMPLOYEES DURING 
              LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

    (a) Provisions Relating to Those Who Are Permitted or Required to 
Serve.--Any officer or employee of the United States Government or of 
the District of Columbia government who is permitted or required to 
serve during any period in which there is a lapse in appropriations 
with respect to the agency in or under which such officer or employee 
is employed shall be compensated at the standard rate of compensation 
for such officer or employee for such period.
    (b) Provisions Relating to Those Who Have Been Furloughed.--
            (1) In general.--Any officer or employee of the United 
        States Government or of the District of Columbia government who 
        is furloughed for any period as a result of a lapse in 
        appropriations shall not be entitled to basic pay with respect 
        to any portion of such period, except as provided in paragraph 
        (2).
            (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
        any officer or employee referred to in paragraph (1) who is 
        willing and able to serve during the period of the lapse in 
        appropriations--
                    (A) shall be permitted to serve; and
                    (B) shall be compensated for any such service in 
                accordance with subsection (a).
    (c) Definition.--For the purpose of this section, the term 
``agency'' includes any employing entity of the United States 
Government or of the District of Columbia government.
    (d) Applicability.--This section shall apply with respect to any 
lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 1996 occurring after December 
15, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,983,745
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  580,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    66,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,309,584
<PP&E>                                         275,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,096,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,275,234
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       82,287
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,559,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,096,576
<SALES>                                        2,592,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,651,368
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,635,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,092,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,092,027)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.09)



</TABLE>
#### § 110.71 Insufficient documentation for eligibility and benefits determinations.

In the event that there is insufficient documentation in the Request Package for the Secretary to make the applicable determinations under this part, the Secretary will so notify the requester, or his or her representative. The requester will be given 60 calendar days from the date of the Secretary's notification to submit the required documentation. If the requester is unable to provide the additional documentation, he or she may provide a written explanation of the reason(s) that the requested documentation is unavailable and the efforts the requester has made to obtain the documents. The Secretary may accept such a statement in place of the required documentation or disapprove the Request for Benefits due to insufficient documentation. If insufficient documentation is submitted in response to the Secretary's letter, the Secretary may disapprove the Request for Benefits.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.45 Rural health clinic services: Scope and conditions. ( a ) Medicare Part B pays for the following rural health clinic services, if they are furnished in accordance with the requirements and conditions specified in part 405, subpart X, and part 491 of this chapter: ( 1 ) Physicians' services.
( 2 ) Services and supplies furnished as an incident to physicians' professional services.
( 3 ) Nurse practitioner and physician assistant services.
( 4 ) Services and supplies furnished as an incident to nurse practitioners' or physician assistants' services.
( 5 ) Visiting nurse services.
( b ) Medicare pays for rural health clinic services when they are furnished at the clinic, at a hospital or other medical facility, or at the beneficiary's place of residence.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 20, 2020

NO. 03-19-00502-CV

Appellants Edward Roels, Bruce Barshop, Julie Mak, and Jim Pabst// Cross-Appellants, 

Lee Valkenaar, Jack Long, Roxann Chargois, Jarred Maxwell and Aqushen, LLC

v.

Appellees, Lee Valkenaar, Jarred Maxwell, Roxann Chargois, Jack Long, and Aqushen, 

LLC// Cross-Appellees, Edward Roels, Bruce Barshop, Julie Mak, and Jim Pabst

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART;

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order denying appellants’ TCPA motions to dismiss signed by the trial 

court on July 29, 2019. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds 

that there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s order

denying Julie Mak’s, Bruce Barshop’s, and Jim Pabst’s motions; renders judgment dismissing 

appellees’ claims against those appellants; and remands this cause for a determination of 

attorney’s fees to which those appellants are entitled under the TCPA. The Court further 

reverses the trial court’s order denying Edward Roels’s motion solely as to appellees’ claims 

against him for allegedly engaging in interested-director transactions, and renders judgment
dismissing those claims. The Court affirms the trial court’s order in all other regards. Appellees

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
§ 590.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 590.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 590.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLOROR957000-L62510000-PM000: HAG09-0319]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey of the following described lands are scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon 30 days from the date of this publication.

## Willamette Meridian

### Oregon

T. 22 S., R. 4 W., approved July 6, 2009.

T. 23 S., R. 9 E., approved August 3, 2009.

The plats of survey of the following described lands were officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, on April 22, 2009.

### Oregon

T. 1 S., R. 5 W., accepted April 9, 2009.

T. 2 S., R. 5 W., accepted April 9, 2009.

T. 22 S., R. 5 W., accepted April 9, 2009.

T. 22 S., R. 9 W., accepted April 16, 2009.

T. 35 S., R. 3 W., accepted April 16, 2009.

The plat of survey of the following described lands was officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, on June 18, 2009.

### Oregon

T. 10 S., R. 1 E., accepted May 14, 2009.

The plat of survey of the following described lands was officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, on July 17, 2009.

### Washington

T. 13 N., R. 3 W., accepted June 15, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at the Oregon/Washington State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 333 S.W. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 S.W. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

Dated: August 11, 2009.

Fred O'Ferrall,

Branch of Lands and Minerals Resources.

[FR Doc. E9-20206 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.172 Payment for partial hospitalization services in CMHCs: Conditions. Medicare Part B pays for partial hospitalization services furnished in a CMHC on behalf of an individual only if the following conditions are met: ( a ) The CMHC files a written request for payment on the CMS form 1450 and in the manner prescribed by CMS; and
( b ) The services are furnished in accordance with the requirements described in § 410.110.
[59 FR 6578, Feb. 11, 1994]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 26, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 Honorable Jose E. Martinez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of *

Florida, sitting by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-15326

________________________

BIA No. A73-744-888

WOSEN D. GIZAW, 

Petitioner, 

versus 

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

 (February 26, 2008)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, WILSON, Circuit Judge, and MARTINEZ,*

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:
2

Wosen D. Gizaw, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review the

Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. He

seeks to reopen the BIA’s prior order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for asylum and withholding of removal. In his

motion to reopen, Gizaw argued that new, dangerous conditions have arisen for

members of his tribe in Ethiopia. He argued that his tribe suffers from a “pattern

of abuse” by the current Ethiopian government and that if he were to return to

Ethiopia, his life would be in grave danger. After noting that Gizaw failed to

include an application of asylum with his application, as required by 8 C.F.R. §

1003.2(c)(1), the BIA went on to address the merits of his motion. Because the

BIA failed to consider Gizaw’s “pattern or practice” claim, we vacate its denial of

Gizaw’s motion to reopen and remand this case to the BIA for further

determination.

“We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of

discretion.” Abdi v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 430 F.3d 1148, 1149 (11th Cir. 2005) (per

curiam). More specifically, we look to whether there has been an exercise of

administrative discretion and whether that exercise was arbitrary or capricious. Id. 

While the BIA could have properly dismissed Gizaw’s motion to reopen for

failing to meet the formal requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1), it did not

clearly exercise its discretion to do so. Instead, the BIA exercised its discretion to
See 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.13(b)(2)(iii)(A)–(B), 208.16(b)(2)(i)–(ii). 1

3

examine the merits of Gizaw’s claim. In doing so, however, the BIA failed to

address Gizaw’s “pattern or practice” claim and focused on his failure to show he 1

would be “singled out” individually for persecution. By denying Gizaw’s motion

without addressing one of his avenues for establishing asylum and withholding of

removal, the BIA’s order was arbitrary and capricious and, therefore, an abuse of

discretion. Accordingly, we VACATE the BIA’s order dismissing Gizaw’s

motion on the merits and REMAND this case to the BIA for further determination.
4

EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, DISSENTS.
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/29 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■

■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
§ 403.258 Statement of actuarial opinion. ( a ) For purposes of certification requests submitted under § 403.232(b) and subsequent review as specified in § 403.239(a), *statement of actuarial opinion* means a signed declaration in which a qualified actuary states that the assumptions used in calculating the expected loss ratio are appropriate and reasonable, taking into account actual policy experience, if any, and reasonable expectations.
( b ) *Qualified actuary* means— ( 1 ) A member in good standing of the American Academy of Actuaries; or
( 2 ) A person who has otherwise demonstrated his or her actuarial competence to the satisfaction of the Commissioner or Superintendent of Insurance of the domiciliary State of the insuring organization.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Lee, director of Viropro, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on 10KSB/A of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 3, 2006.



/s/ Richard Lee

_______________________

Richard Lee

(Acted as chief executive officer and principal accounting officer through September 19, 2005.)