alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date:  March 28, 2011 | /s/ John H. Castle                                                                         
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | John H. Castle
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|                      |                                                                                            
|Date:  March 28, 2011 | /s/ Danice L. Chartrand                                                                    
|                      | Danice L. Chartrand
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 8.54 Conferences. ( a ) *General.* The Director of Practice may confer with an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practioner concerning allegations of misconduct whether or not a proceeding for disbarment or suspension has been instituted. If a conference results in a stipulation in connection with a proceeding in which that person is the respondent, the stipulation may be entered in the record at the instance of either party to the proceeding.
( b ) *Resignation or voluntary suspension.* An attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner, in order to avoid the institution or conclusion of a disbarment or suspension proceeding, may offer his or her consent to suspension from practice before the Bureau. An enrolled practitioner may also offer a resignation. The Director of Practice, at his or her discretion, may accept the offered resignation of an enrolled practitioner and may suspend an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner in accordance with the consent offered.
# Zimbabwe

68 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zimbabwe	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    		Zimbabwe	  August 2, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
# C_2005296EN.01002801.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/28

---

Action brought on 9 September 2005 — MacLean-Fogg/OHIM

(Case T-339/05)

(2005/C 296/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): MacLean-Fogg Company (Mundelein, USA) [represented by: H. Eichmann, G. Barth, U. Blumenröder, C. Niklas-Falter, M. Kinkeldey, K. Brandt, A. Franke, U. Stephani, B. Allekotte, E. Bertram, K. Lochner, B. Ertle, C. Neuhierl, S. Prückner, C. Schmitt, B. Mehnert, P. Lübbe, S. Brötje, lawyers]

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) in the case R 1122/2004-1 of June 20, 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) in the case R 1122/2004-1 of June 20, 2005;

| — | order the costs of the proceedings to be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the costs of the proceedings to be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘LOKTHREAD’ for goods in class 6 (bolts, bolts of metal, nuts, nuts of metal) — application No 3 440 666

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application for all goods

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the trade mark has to be considered as a whole and not as composed of two English words and thus possesses a minimum degree of distinctiveness.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented.



                                           /s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                           -------------------------
                                           C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                           November 18, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Circuit Research Labs, Inc. and will be retained by the corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### David William TREMBLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-146.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 412.324 General description. ( a ) *Hospitals under Medicare in FY 1991.* During the ten-year transition period, payments to a hospital with a hospital-specific rate below the Federal rate are based on the fully prospective payment methodology under § 412.340 or for a hospital with a hospital-specific rate above the Federal rate, the hold-harmless payment methodology under § 412.344.
( b ) *New hospitals.* ( 1 ) A new hospital, as defined under § 412.300(b), is paid 85 percent of its allowable Medicare inpatient hospital capital-related costs through its cost reporting period ending at least 2 years after the hospital accepts its first patient.
( 2 ) For the third year through the remainder of the transition period, the hospital is paid based on the fully prospective payment methodology or the hold-harmless payment methodology using the base period determined under § 412.328(a)(2).
( 3 ) If the hospital is paid under the hold-harmless methodology described in § 412.344, the hold-harmless payment for old capital costs described in § 412.344(a)(1) is payable for up to and including 8 years and may continue beyond the first cost reporting period beginning on or after October 1, 2000.
( c ) *Hospitals with 52-53 week fiscal years ending September 25 through September 29.* For purposes of this subpart, a hospital with a 52-53 week fiscal year period beginning September 26 through September 30, 1992 is deemed to have the same beginning date for all cost reporting periods beginning before October 1, 2000 (unless the hospital later changes its cost reporting period).
[56 FR 43449, Aug. 30, 1991; 57 FR 3016, Jan. 27, 1992]
# Zimbabwe

68 items

        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Zimbabwe	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Zimbabwe Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 18, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zimbabwe	  March 30, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Zimbabwe (21-324.1) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  March 24, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 23, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 11, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2020 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 26, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Zimbabwe	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Zimbabwe	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Zimbabwe	  June 10, 2020 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
# C_2005315EN.01000802.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln by order of that court of 24 August 2005 in Rizeni Letoveho Provozu UR SP v Bundesamt für Finanzen

(Case C-335/05)

(2005/C 315/15)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Köln (Finance Court, Cologne) of 24 August 2005, received at the Court Registry on 15 September 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Rizeni Letoveho Provozu UR SP and Bundesamt für Finanzen (Federal Finance Office) on the following question:

Is Article 2(2) of Thirteenth Council Directive 86/560/EEC of 17 November 1986 (1) on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes to be interpreted restrictively as meaning that the possibility thereby afforded the Member States of making refunds of value added tax conditional on the grant by non-Member States of comparable advantages in regard to turnover taxes, does not refer to States which, as contracting parties to the General Agreement on Trade in Services — GATS — (BGBl. II 1994, 1473, 1643), may rely on the most-favoured nation clause contained therein (Art. II(1) GATS)?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 326, p. 40.

1

---
#### § 137.351 Is a Self-Governance Tribe required to submit construction project progress and financial reports for construction project agreements?

Yes, a Self-Governance Tribe must provide the Secretary with construction project progress and financial reports semiannually or, at the option of the Self-Governance Tribe, on a more frequent basis. Self-Governance Tribes are only required to submit the reports, as negotiated in the Construction Project Agreement, after funds have been transferred to the Self-Governance Tribe for a construction project. Construction project progress reports and financial reports are only required for active construction projects.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Danish Permanent Secretary Tranholm-Mikkelsen

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Danish Permanent Secretary Tranholm-Mikkelsen							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 19, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with Danish Permanent Secretary Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen yesterday in Washington.  Deputy Secretary Campbell and Permanent Secretary Tranholm-Mikkelsen underscored the importance of the U.S.-Denmark relationship to security and prosperity in the Euro-Atlantic region and the Red Sea.  They also discussed peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific, support for Ukraine, and the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDenmarkIndo-PacificNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceRed SeaSecurity

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.35 Limitations on charges to a beneficiary or other party when a workers' compensation plan, a no-fault insurer, or an employer group health plan is primary payer. ( a ) *Definition.* As used in this section *Medicare-covered services* means services for which Medicare benefits are payable or would be payable except for the Medicare deductible and coinsurance provisions and the amounts payable by the primary payer.
( b ) *Applicability.* This section applies when a workers' compensation plan, a no-fault insurer or an employer group health plan is primary to Medicare.
( c ) *Basic rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the amounts the provider or supplier may collect or seek to collect, for the Medicare-covered services from the beneficiary or any entity other than the workers' compensation plan, the no-fault insurer, or the employer plan and Medicare, are limited to the following: ( 1 ) The amount paid or payable by the primary payer to the beneficiary. If this amount exceeds the amount payable by Medicare (without regard to deductible or coinsurance), the provider or supplier may retain the primary payment in full without violating the terms of the provider agreement or the conditions of assignment.
( 2 ) The amount, if any, by which the applicable Medicare deductible and coinsurance amounts exceed any primary payment made or due to the beneficiary or to the provider or supplier for the medical services.
( 3 ) The amount of any charges that may be made to a beneficiary under § 413.35 of this chapter when cost limits are applied to the services, or under § 489.32 of this chapter when the services are partially covered, but only to the extent that the primary payer is not responsible for those charges.
( d ) *Exception.* The limitations of paragraph (c) of this section do not apply if the services were furnished by a supplier that is not a participating supplier and has not accepted assignment for the services or claimed payment under § 424.64 of this chapter.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 1101

OSCAR DAVID SANCHEZ SANTOS , Petitioner ,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR , Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 12, 2019 Decided: September 20, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
John E. Gallagher , Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H . Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Ann M. Welhaf , Office of Immigration Litigation , Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Responden t.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Oscar David Sanchez Santos, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal

from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Sanchez

Santos’ merits hearin g and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the agency ’s conclusion that the Dep artment of Homeland Security rebutted any presumption of a well

- founded fear of persecution by establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Sanchez Santos could “avoid a future threat to his . . . life or freedom by relocating to another part of [El Salvador] and, under all the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect [him] to do so.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(1)(B) (2019). We further conclude that substantial evidence supports the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture. See Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Sanchez Santos , (B.I.A. Dec. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
HomeSudan

# Sudan

248 items

        -    Press Statement  		On Civilian Casualties in Sudan	  Matthew MillerSeptember 13, 2023 
        -    Video Remarks  		Ambassador Van Schaack’s Video Remarks on the Situation in Sudan (Arabic)	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 11, 2023 
        -    Video Remarks  		Ambassador Van Schaack’s Video Remarks on the Situation in Sudan (English)	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 11, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Actions Against Senior Rapid Support Forces Commanders in Sudan	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield Announces Nearly $163 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance for the Sudan Emergency Response	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Sudan	  Matthew MillerAugust 25, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Minister Shoukry of Egypt	  August 22, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Mike Hammer Travels to Stockholm and Brussels	  August 18, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan	  August 17, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 17, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 17, 2023Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…45678…25next page

Back to Top
§ 110.43 Deadlines for submitting documentation. ( a ) *Documentation for eligibility determinations.* A requester will satisfy the filing deadline as long as the signed Request Form is completed (to the fullest extent possible) and submitted within the governing filing deadline described in § 110.42. The Secretary generally will not begin review of a requester's eligibility until all the documentation necessary to make this determination has been submitted.
( b ) *Documentation for benefits determinations.* Although the Secretary will accept documentation required to make benefits determinations (*i.e.,* calculate benefits available, if any) at the time the Request Form is filed or any time thereafter, requesters need not submit such documentation until they have been notified that the Secretary has determined eligibility. The Secretary will not generally begin review of the benefits available to a requester until the documentation necessary to make a benefits determination has been submitted.
C OURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO BARRERA, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 117

- C R

Appeal from the

244 th District Court

of E ctor County , Texas

(TC# C

- 19

- 1105

- CR )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Access to the Appellate Record.

Therefore, this Court is hereby provid ing a hard copy of the appellate record, which consists of 1

volume of the Clerk’s Record , 1 volume of the Supplemental Clerk’s Record and 13 volumes of

the Reporter’s Record, via U. S. mail, to the Warden of the Ector County Jail, 2500 US

- 385

,

Odessa , T X 7 976 6 , for use by the Appellant Armanda Barrera, Jr. , ( SO # 78031 )

. The Warden or

designated custodian of records shall make this record available to the appellant for purposes of

preparing h is appellate brief. Appellant’s Pro Se brief shall be due in thi s office on or before

September 17, 2020

. The hard copy of this record does not need to be returned to this

Court. Further, please note that copies of the exhibits are not provided and only a copy of the

Index (Volume 14 of 14 of the Reporter’s Record) has been provide d.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 th day of August

, 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
# C_2005188EN.01001002.xml

| 2.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3813 — Fortune Brands/Allied Domecq)

(2005/C 188/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3813. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3813. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 137.217 May funds provided under compacts, funding agreements, or grants made pursuant to Title V be treated as non-Federal funds for purposes of meeting matching or cost participation requirements under any other Federal or non-Federal program?

Yes, funds provided under compacts, funding agreements, or grants made pursuant to Title V may be treated as non-Federal funds for purposes of meeting matching or cost participation requirements under any other Federal or non-Federal program.