alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00103

- CR

CHARLIE JESUS VICENT E, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the C riminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 45411

- J



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Appellant filed his brief and a motion to exten d time to file the same on September 6, 2019. In

the interest of expediting the appeal and because no hearing has been scheduled or held, we

GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

The State’s brief is due by Oc tober 7, 2019.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
#### § 8.60 Motions and requests.

Motions and requests may be filed with the Director of Practice or with the Administrative Law Judge.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 312.4 Bond of indemnity.

No Federal savings and loan association or Federal credit union which may have been designated for employment mentioned in this part shall perform, or make any effort to perform any of the acts included in such employment, or advertise in any manner that it is authorized to perform such acts until it has qualified by the execution of, delivery to, and approval of a bond of indemnity in favor of the United States with satisfactory surety, or with the pledge of collateral security as provided in part 225 of this chapter, conditioned upon the faithful performance of the obligor's duties as fiscal agent of the United States in the principal amount of $1,000 and until the Federal Home Loan Bank Board or the Bureau of Federal Credit Unions, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, respectively, shall have certified to the Secretary of the Treasury that such association or credit union is in good standing and is eligible, under the terms and conditions prescribed by the Secretary, to qualify for the performance of the designated acts. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board and the Bureau of Credit Unions, respectively, shall keep the Secretary of the Treasury currently advised of the changes in the lists of associations and credit unions which are eligible, under the aforesaid terms and conditions, to qualify for the performance of the designated acts.

[32 FR 3447, Mar. 2, 1967]
#### § 1005.5 Ex parte contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) will communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
§ 584.308 Participated in efforts to conceal the legal liability for the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky. The term *participated in efforts to conceal the legal liability for the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky* includes direct or indirect, knowing or unknowing, involvement in, among others: ( a ) Actions with the intent or effect of obstructing the release of evidence regarding Sergei Magnitsky's treatment during his detention;
( b ) Posthumous legal proceedings against Sergei Magnitsky; or
( c ) The making of any false or misleading reports or accounts by officials of the Russian Federation concerning Sergei Magnitsky's detention, abuse, or death, or the fraudulent tax scheme he discovered, including official statements or findings regarding Sergei Magnitsky's treatment during his detention that contradict the July 6, 2011, findings of the independent investigation by the Presidential Council on the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights, or the December 28, 2009, report of the Public Oversight Commission for the City of Moscow for the Control of the Observance of Human Rights in Places of Forced Detention.
HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of the Chief of Protocol...Blair House Division

# Blair House Division

## 				Blair House: The President's Guest House			

					1651 Pennsylvania Avenue may not be a well-known address, but the structure on that site is known throughout the world as Blair House, the President’s Guest House, managed by the Office of the Chief of Protocol. The Blair House of today consists of four interconnected townhouses, forming a 120-room complex totaling 70,000 square feet. The original Blair House, from which the entire complex takes its name, appears on Pennsylvania Avenue as a yellow masonry structure in the late federal style. Blair House has long been associated with important events in America history, and in recent times, world history. An invitation to visit the United States and stay at Blair House is an extraordinary honor for a foreign head of state. Blair House was built around 1824 by Dr. Joseph Lovell, the eighth Surgeon General of the United States, on land purchased from Commodore Stephen Decatur. In 1836, Francis Preston Blair, who ran the Globe newspaper and was one of Andrew Jackson’s closest confidants, purchased the house for $6,500. Following Blair’s retirement to Maryland in 1846, the house was occupied by his descendants and other notable people for the next 100 years. During World War II, Blair House was purchased by the federal government and officially became the President’s guest house for heads of state visiting the White House. The house underwent a major renovation in the 1980s and remains a magnificent home for monarchs, presidents, and prime ministers while in Washington. The staff at Blair House attend to these guests’ needs and wants, offering service and hospitality as luxurious as a five-star hotel. Blair House employs a team of chefs who offer the best of American cuisine, featuring locally sourced food and the best American wines. The staff keep Blair House in a constant state of readiness and strive to make Blair House a comfortable home for all guests. For more information about the Blair House, please visit the Blair House Restoration Fund page at www.blairhouse.org.				

Back to Top
§ 802.102 Risk-based analysis. Any determination of the Committee with respect to a covered real estate transaction, to suspend, refer to the President, or to negotiate, enter into or impose, or enforce any agreement or condition under section 721 shall be based on a risk-based analysis, conducted by the Committee, of the effects on the national security of the United States of the covered real estate transaction. Any such risk-based analysis shall include credible evidence demonstrating the risk and an assessment of the threat, vulnerabilities, and consequences to national security related to the transaction. For purposes of this part, any such analysis of risk shall include and be informed by consideration of the following elements: ( a ) The *threat,* which is a function of the intent and capability of a foreign person to take action to impair the national security of the United States;
( b ) The *vulnerabilities,* which are the extent to which the nature of the covered real estate presents susceptibility to impairment of national security; and
( c ) The *consequences to national security,* which are the potential effects on national security that could reasonably result from the exploitation of the vulnerabilities by the threat actor.
#### McArthur BELIN, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 75-146.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Habeas corpus denied.
# C_2005195EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 August 2005

(2005/C 195/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2367 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4617 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6929 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,359 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,556 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,69 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8905 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,465 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0358 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4264 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,56 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,51 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6362 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6246 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5015 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6118 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7899 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0483 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9854 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0259 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3625 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 113,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6357 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,101 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,131 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,969 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2367

JPY

Japanese yen

138,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4617

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6929

SEK

Swedish krona

9,359

CHF

Swiss franc

1,556

ISK

Iceland króna

79,69

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8905

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

29,465

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0358

RON

Romanian leu

3,4264

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,56

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,51

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6362

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6246

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5015

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6118

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7899

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0483

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,64

ZAR

South African rand

7,9854

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0259

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3625

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 113,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6357

PHP

Philippine peso

69,101

RUB

Russian rouble

35,131

THB

Thai baht

50,969

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Germany

402 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Germany	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		Joint Statement on German-U.S. Science and Technology Cooperation	  February 18, 2020 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – North Macedonia Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Germany August 21, 2019	   
        -    Report  		Germany	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Germany	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Germany	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Germany	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Germany	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Germany	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Germany	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…3435363738…41next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2980 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2980

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 1996

                                Received

                              May 9, 1996

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to stalking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Stalking Punishment and 
Prevention Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. PUNISHMENT OF INTERSTATE STALKING.

    (a) In General.--Title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after section 2261 the following:
``Sec. 2261A. Interstate stalking
    ``Whoever travels across a State line or within the special 
maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States with the 
intent to injure or harass another person, and in the course of, or as 
a result of, such travel places that person in reasonable fear of the 
death of, or serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365(g)(3) of 
this title) to, that person or a member of that person's immediate 
family (as defined in section 115 of this title) shall be punished as 
provided in section 2261 of this title.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 2261(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 
        amended by inserting ``or section 2261A'' after ``this 
        section''.
            (2) Sections 2261(b) and 2262(b) of title 18, United States 
        Code, are each amended by striking ``offender's spouse or 
        intimate partner'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``victim''.
            (3) The chapter heading for chapter 110A of title 18, 
        United States Code, is amended by inserting ``AND STALKING'' 
        after ``VIOLENCE''.
            (4) The table of chapters at the beginning of part I of 
        title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking

``110A.    Domestic violence................................     2261''
        and inserting:

``110A.    Domestic violence and stalking...................    2261''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 110A of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 2261 the following new item:

``2261A. Interstate stalking.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1004.90 Basis for recommended sanction. The QIO's specific recommendation must be based on documentation provided to the OIG showing its consideration of— ( a ) The type of offense involved;
( b ) The severity of the offense;
( c ) The deterrent value;
( d ) The practitioner's or other person's previous sanction record;
( e ) The availability of alternative sources of services in the community; and
( f ) Any other factors that the QIO considers relevant, such as the duration of the problem.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 2, 2021

No. 04-21-00174-CV

IN RE AMX CONSTRUCTION & SPECIALTY SERVICES, LP, Relator

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief are DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on June 2, 2021.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of June, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-08473, styled Texas First Rentals, LLC v. AMX Construction & 

Specialty Services, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou 

Alvarez presiding.
#### SOUNDCOT, INC., a Florida corporation, and Glenn W. Turner, Appellants, v. Anthony PIONESSA, and John Dedmon d/b/a Sight & Sound of Georgia, Appellees.

Nos. 73-83, 73-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... annual report[electronic resource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:G 34/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635145
 
September 16, 2019
#### § 802.239 Urban cluster.

The term *urban cluster* means a statistical geographic area as identified in the most recent U.S. Census consisting of a densely settled core created from census tracts or blocks and contiguous qualifying territory that together have at least 2,500 individuals but fewer than 50,000 individuals.
#### § 566.312 Knowingly.

The term *knowingly,* with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
# Greece

168 items

        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Geoffrey Pyatt’s Remarks at the 25th Annual Capital Link Invest in Greece Forum	  Geoffrey R. PyattDecember 11, 2023New York City, New York 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Greece	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis	  November 6, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Thessaloniki, Greece: Pinewood – The American International School of Thessaloniki: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Athens, Greece: American Community Schools of Athens: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 11, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara Travel to Greece	  September 7, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Adds Foreign Companies to Entity List for Malicious Cyber Activities	  July 18, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 11, 2023 

previous page12345…17next page

Back to Top
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00727-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF F.R., JR., et al., Children

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01990

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2009

AFFIRMED

After the trial court terminated her parental rights, Judy Ann A. appealed the trial court’s 

order determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2008). Judy Ann’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a 

brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no 

arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without 

merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See also 

In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 
04-08-00727-CV

-2-

2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental 

rights); In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Judy Ann who was advised of 

her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After 

reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of 

the trial court is, therefore, affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Rebecca Simmons, Justice
HomeGuatemala

# Guatemala

182 items

        -    		Francisco  Batz Ajanel	  August 1, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Guatemala (90-323.1) – Employment Agreement	  March 23, 1990 

previous page1…171819

Back to Top
#### *In re*BALUSS’ ESTATE.

Appeal and Error — Record—Briefs—Assignments.

Two oases, heard as one upon a single bill of exceptions that by stipulation counsel used in both cases, are ordered struck from the docket because the printed record contains no assignments of error, references to the record appear in blank, the index is omitted from the record in one case and the record and briefs are very uncertain and confusing.

Error to Lenawee; Golden, J.

Submitted November 14, 1911.

(Docket Nos. 114, 115.)

Webster C. Jipson presented two claims against the estate of Daniel D. Baluss, deceased. Both were disallowed by the commissioners on claims, and on appeal to the circuit court judgment was entered for defendant estate.

Stricken from the docket December 29, 1911.

Smith, *Baldwin &*Alexander, for appellant.

*Dayton B. Morgan*and *J. N.*Sampson, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

These two causes were submitted upon briefs. Both causes were tried in the court below by the court without a jury. There appears to have been a single bill of exceptions settled, which counsel have intended to use, and by stipulation seem to have agreed to use, in both causes. The alleged bill of exceptions is printed in the record in the cause first above entitled. It contains no assignments of error. It contains many references to the record which are left blank, indicating that when the record went to ’the printer the paging was omitted, and it has never been supplied. In No. 115, second above entitled, the record contains no index. The bill of exceptions is not printed. The briefs contain numerous references, inserted in ink, to the record in the other case. *133In addition to this, we have found the records and briefs in both cases so uncertain and confusing that we feel warranted in declining to consider either of these causes upon the records as filed in this court.

An order will be entered striking both causes from the docket.
# C_2005155EN.01000102.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich by judgment of that court of 4 March 2005 in Manfred Seidl v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen

(Case C-117/05)

(2005/C 155/02)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria) of 4 March 2005, received at the Court Registry on 10 March 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Manfred Seidl and Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen on the following question:

Are Articles 43 et seq. of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be interpreted as meaning that a requirement of the law of the Member State of establishment that an applicant for a driving school permit who is a national of a Member State and wishes to obtain a driving school permit in another Member State may not possess any other driving school permit constitutes an inadmissible restriction on the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Community?

---
699 A.2d 728

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Craig MURPHY, Appellant.

No. 0169 Capital Appeal Docket.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 15, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 1997, we Grant the Emergency Motion for a Stay of Execution.