alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 405.2112 ESRD network organizations. CMS will designate an administrative governing body (network organization) for each network. The functions of a network organization include but are not limited to the following: ( a ) Developing network goals for placing patients in settings for self-care and transplantation.
( b ) Encouraging the use of medically appropriate treatment settings most compatible with patient rehabilitation and the participation of patients, providers of services, and renal disease facilities in vocational rehabilitation programs.
( c ) Developing criteria and standards relating to the quality and appropriateness of patient care and, with respect to working with patients, facilities, and providers of services, for encouraging participation in vocational rehabilitation programs.
( d ) Evaluating the procedures used by facilities in the network in assessing patients for placement in appropriate treatment modalities.
( e ) Making recommendations to member facilities as needed to achieve network goals.
( f ) On or before July 1 of each year, submitting to CMS an annual report that contains the following information: ( 1 ) A statement of the network goals.
( 2 ) The comparative performance of facilities regarding the placement of patients in appropriate settings for— ( i ) Self-care;
( ii ) Transplants; and
( iii ) Vocational rehabilitation programs.
( 3 ) Identification of those facilities that consistently fail to cooperate with the goals specified under paragraph (f)(1) of this section or to follow the recommendations of the medical review board.
( 4 ) Identification of facilities and providers that are not providing appropriate medical care.
( 5 ) Recommendations with respect to the need for additional or alternative services in the network including self-dialysis training, transplantation and organ procurement.
( g ) Evaluating and resolving patient grievances.
( h ) Appointing a network council and a medical review board (each including at least one patient representative) and supporting and coordinating the activities of each.
( i ) Conducting on-site reviews of facilities and providers as necessary, as determined by the medical review board or CMS, using standards of care as specified under paragraph (c) of this section.
( j ) Collecting, validating, and analyzing such data as necessary to prepare the reports required under paragraph (f) of this section and the Secretary's report to Congress on the ESRD program and to assure the maintenance of the registry established under section 1881(c)(7) of the Act.
[53 FR 1620, Jan. 21, 1988]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997                 
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            418,365
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     541,204
<ALLOWANCES>                       15,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,134,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,302,372
<PP&E>                          1,164,600
<DEPRECIATION>                    690,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,509,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             538,413
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           16,366
<OTHER-SE>                      1,991,869 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,509,274
<SALES>                         1,031,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,031,083
<CGS>                             464,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     464,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  652,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 27,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (98,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (98,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (98,595)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Michael D. Becker,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based upon
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Cytogen Corporation and will be retained by Cytogen Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.



                                            /s/ Michael D. Becker
                                            ------------------------------------
Dated:   November 9, 2004                   Michael D. Becker, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 3.524 Form, filing, and service of papers. ( a ) *Forms.* ( 1 ) Unless the ALJ directs the parties to do otherwise, documents filed with the ALJ must include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding must contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number, and a designation of the paper, such as motion to quash subpoena.
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper must be signed by and must contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ or the Board must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of the document on the other party. Service upon any party of any document must be made by delivering a copy, or placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed, or with a private delivery service, to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by an attorney, service must be made upon the attorney in lieu of the party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the natural person serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, constitutes proof of service.
#### OLIVER B. SAALFIELD, ADMINISTRATOR OF JOHN H. BROWN, SURVIVING PARTNER OF JOHN H. BROWN AND HARVEY M. MUNSELL, TRUSTEES, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[51 C. Cls., 22; 246 U. S. 610.]

Plaintiffs contracted with the United States to furnish certain wire-bound rapid-fire guns and the mounts for the same. The contract provided for certain tests to be made of a. sample gun of each caliber and that the acceptance of the guns by the Government would depend upon such tests proving satisfactory. When submitted to the tests the gun passed some of the requirements satisfactorily, but in others did not, and certain material defects being apparent, the War Department requested plaintiffs to submit the guns to an additional test before approving the gun. Upon failure of plaintiffs to comply with this request, and before any guns were delivered, the contract was annulled by the defendants. Plaintiffs sue for the amount alleged to have been expended toward the performance of the contract before its annulment.

The Court below decides:

Where a contract provides that a sample gun shall be tested and the acceptance thereof “ *mil depend upon the type gun passing its test satisfactorily,”*and where in the test certain defects were disclosed, it is held that the gun was not only to pass successfully through the ordeal to which it was to be subjected, but in addition its conduct during the test and its condition afterward must be such as to be satisfactory to the officers of the Government.

*Held,*That the gun not having passed the test “ *satisfactorily ”*in the first instance, and the Chief of Ordnance not having thereupon rejected it, as he had a right to do under the contract, but instead granted the plaintiffs an opportunity for an additional test *de hors*the contract, this was a favor to the plaintiffs, and if they did not accept it the contract was properly annulled.

The decision of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Clakke

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 22,1918.
# C_2005276EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 8 November 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 275 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/......). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

Image

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘James

Lawrence King Federal Justice Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida (for himself and Mrs. MEEK of Florida) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida,

as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast

5 Fourth Street in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

7 Building’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal
2

•HR 255 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

2 a reference to the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

3 Building’’.

Æ
#### § 137.66 May a Self-Governance Tribe keep interest earned on statutorily mandated grant funds?

Yes, a Self-Governance Tribe may keep Interest Earned on Statutorily Mandated Grant Funds.
#### § 137.360 Does the Secretary approve project planning and design documents prepared by the Self-Governance Tribe?

The Secretary shall have at least one opportunity to approve project planning and design documents prepared by the Self-Governance Tribe in advance of construction if the Self-Governance Tribe is required to submit planning or design documents as a part of the scope of work under a construction project agreement.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS

       We  have  issued  our  report  dated  January  10, 2001, accompanying the
consolidated  financial  statements  included  in  the  2000  Annual  Report  of
Harleysville  National  Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration  Statements  of  Harleysville  National  Corporation  on  Form  S-3
(Registration  No.  33-57790),  on  Forms  S-8  (Registration  No.  33-69784 and
Registration  No.  33-17813)  and  on  Form  S-4  (Registration  Statement  No.
333-95983).



GRANT  THORNTON  LLP


Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
March  26,  2001
#### § 35.47 Disposition of Government checks.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this subpart, immediately upon completion of the inventory, checks drawn on the Treasurer of the United States shall be sent by safe means to the department, agency, or establishment of the Government of the United States issuing such checks. The transmittal shall be accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefor and of all available information which may aid the issuing unit in the disposition of the check transmitted. Notice of the disposition of any checks, with identifying information, shall be given to the person or persons, if any, to which money and effects are delivered in accordance with § 35.44.
#### § 137.426 May an Indian Tribe get an extension of time to file a notice of appeal?

Yes, if the Indian Tribe needs additional time, the Indian Tribe may request an extension of time to file its Notice of Appeal with the IBIA within 60 days of receiving either the initial decision or the recommended decision resulting from the informal conference. The request of the Indian Tribe must be in writing, and must give a reason for not filing its notice of appeal within the 30-day time period. If the Indian Tribe has a valid reason for not filing its notice of appeal on time, it may receive an extension.
§ 2.24 Requirements for intermediaries. Upon request, an intermediary must provide to patients who have consented to the disclosure of their records using a general designation, pursuant to § 2.31(a)(4)(ii)(B), a list of persons to which their records have been disclosed pursuant to the general designation. ( a ) Under this section, patient requests: ( 1 ) Must be made in writing; and
( 2 ) Are limited to disclosures made within the past 3 years.
( b ) Under this section, the entity named on the consent form that discloses information pursuant to a patient's general designation (the entity that serves as an intermediary) must: ( 1 ) Respond in 30 or fewer days of receipt of the written request; and
( 2 ) Provide, for each disclosure, the name(s) of the entity(ies) to which the disclosure was made, the date of the disclosure, and a brief description of the patient identifying information disclosed.
[89 FR 12625, Feb. 16, 2024]
§ 599.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations. This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations. Note 1 to § 599.101 .
This part has been published in abbreviated form for the purpose of providing immediate guidance to the public. OFAC intends to supplement this part with a more comprehensive set of regulations, which may include additional interpretive guidance and definitions, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions.
§ 136.350 Contracts with Urban Indian organizations. ( a ) The Secretary, acting through the Service, to the extent that funds are available for the purpose, shall contract with urban Indian organizations selected under § 36.351 of this subdivision to carry out the following activities in the urban centers where such organizations are situated: ( 1 ) Determine the population of urban Indians which are or could be recipients of health referral or care services;
( 2 ) Identify all public and private health service resources within the urban center in which the organization is situated which are or may be available to urban Indians;
( 3 ) Assist such resources in providing service to such urban Indians;
( 4 ) Assist such urban Indians in becoming familiar with and utilizing such resources;
( 5 ) Provide basic health education to such urban Indians;
( 6 ) Establish and implement manpower training programs to accomplish the referral and education tasks set forth in paragraphs (a)(3) through (5) of this section;
( 7 ) Identify gaps between unmet health needs of urban Indians and the resources available to meet such needs;
( 8 ) Make recommendations to the Secretary and Federal, State, local, and other resource agencies on methods of improving health service programs to meet the needs of urban Indians; and
( 9 ) Prove or contract for health care services to urban Indians where local health delivery resources are not available, not accessible, or not acceptable to the urban Indians to be served.
( b ) Contracts with urban Indian organizations pursuant to this title shall be in accordance with all Federal contracting laws and regulations except that, in the discretion of the Secretary, such contracts may be negotiated without advertising and need not conform to the provisions of the Act of August 24, 1935 as amended, (The Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. 270a *et seq.* which is concerned with bonding requirements).
( c ) Payments under contracts may be made in advance or by way of reimbursement and in such installments and on such conditions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the purposes of title V of the Act.
( d ) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the Secretary may, at the request or consent of an urban Indian organization, revise or amend any contract made by him with such organization pursuant to this subdivision as necessary to carry out the purposes of title V of this Act: Provided, however, that whenever an urban Indian organization requests retrocession of the Secretary for any such contract, retrocession shall become effective upon a date specified by the Secretary not more than one hundred and twenty days from the date of the request by the organization or at such later date as may be mutually agreed to by the Secretary and the organization.
( e ) In connection with any contract made pursuant to this subdivision, the Secretary may permit an urban Indian organization to utilize, in carrying out such contract, existing facilities owned by the Federal Government within his jurisdiction under such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon for their use and maintenance.
Proposed FFY 2013 – FFY 2018 Part C SPP/APR: Directed Questions

(04736) 1820-0578: Part C SPP/APR

OSEP is requesting that commenters respond to the following specific questions regarding the 

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) (Proposed Indicator 11). Responses to these questions 

will assist OSEP in providing technical assistance to States as they develop the SSIP and in 

implementing the SSIP requirement.

1. What, if any, additional guidance from OSEP would you need in order to develop the 

proposed State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) as part of your SPP?

2. What, if any, revisions to the proposed SSIP would be needed, to best support States’

work with their LEAs in improving outcomes for students with disabilities?

3. What, if any, revisions to the proposed SSIP requirements would be needed so that the 

SSIP is aligned with other improvement planning going on within the State?

4. What, if any, aspects of the proposed SSIP requirements would require flexibility for the 

State to develop a meaningful plan?

5. What, if any, types of resources, including support from OSEP-funded TA providers, 

would you need to help develop the proposed SSIP?

6. What would be the benefit of having peers review the SSIP as part of the OSEP 

determination process?

7. What criteria would you recommend that OSEP use to evaluate the proposed SSIP?
#### § 21.56 Reappointment.

An officer of the Reserve Corps, after being examined and found qualified for reappointment, may be recommended for reappointment to the same grade in the event that his commission expires before he becomes eligible for reappointment to a higher grade, or may be recommended for reappointment to a higher grade to be effective on or after the date on which he meets the qualifications prescribed in this subpart for original appointment to such higher grade.
NO. SCWC-29210

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

CFI INC., a Hawai  i Corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff/Appellant,

vs.

HAMAKUA COAST REALTY, INC., a Hawai  i Corporation, and DENIS FERRARI, Respondents/Defendants/Appellees,

and

ERNEST B. TEXEIRA, Petitioner/Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee

and

ALA KAI REALTY, INC.,a Hawai  i Corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Third

- Party Plaintiff/Appellee,

and

TEX INC., a Hawai  i Corporation, et al., Respondent/Defendant/Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29210; CIV. NO. 06 -1- 0380 (HILO) ) Electronically Filed Supreme Court

SCWC-29210

28-DEC-2011

11:12 AMORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit

Court Judge Sakamoto, in place of Acoba, J., recused )

Petitioner/Defendant- Third

- Party Plaintiff/Appellee

Ernest B. Texeira’s amended petition for writ of certiorari,

filed on November 23, 2011, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, December 28, 2011.

Nelson H. Kinoshita /s for petitioner/

defendant- third

- party /s plaintiff/appellee on the petition

. /s

Douglas L. Halsted, for respondent/plaintiff/ appellant on the opposition. / Mark E. Recktenwald

/ Paula A. Nakayama

/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Karl K. Sakamoto
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Emile PITRE.

No. 55163.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1974.

In re: Emile Pitre applying for Writ of Certiorari, Prohibition and Review.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.