alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT — APPELLATE TERM,

APRIL, 1898.

#### Joseph Levene et al., Appellants, *v.*Lascar Laskaropulos et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the city of Eew York for the second judicial district, rendered in favor of the defendants. - , I

Abraham B. Schleimer, for appellants.

No appearance for respondents.

Beekman, P. J.

The sole question involved in this appeal is one of fact, and it is well settled that this court in such a case will not interfere with the determination of the trial justice unless his decision is so palpably against the weight of evidence that it would be a denial of justice to allow it ¡to stand. Whether or not the appellants were *bona fide*holders of the note in question depended upon the credibility of witnesses which it Iwas peculiarly within the province of the justice below to determine. In doing so, he had the advantage, which we do not possess, of observing the manner in which their testimony was given and their demeanor on the witness stand. We are, therefore, not inclined to .disturb the judgment in favor of the defendant Lascaxopulos, the maker of the note in suit, dismissing the complaint as to him.

It is different, however, with the defendant Weinberg, the indorser, who interposed no defense to the action, but seems, when examined as a witness, to have admitted his liability on the note.

*760. The judgment is, therefore, reversed as to the defendant Weinberg, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, and affirmed as to the defendant Lasearopulos, with costs. - ■ - Í

Gildebsleeve and Giegebioh, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed , as to defendant Weinberg, and new trial ordered, with coste to appellants to abide event, and1 affirmed as to defendant Lasearopulos, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-1997 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                               1
<CASH>                                                                    2,108 
<SECURITIES>                                                                318 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             1,545 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                428 
<INVENTORY>                                                                 309 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          4,215 
<PP&E>                                                                   14,691 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            2,478 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           19,791 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     3,524 
<BONDS>                                                                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0 
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0 
<COMMON>                                                                 31,202 
<OTHER-SE>                                                              (23,409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             19,791 
<SALES>                                                                  17,279 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         17,279 
<CGS>                                                                    15,833 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            17,080 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                             67 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          559 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            (293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  1 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        (294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0 
<CHANGES>                                                                     0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                               (294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.12)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005158EN.01000101.xml

| 29.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 June 2005

(2005/C 158/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2095 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4494 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6646 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5445 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,98 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5737 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,038 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0548 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 056 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,44 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,439 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6349 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5790 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4919 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3984 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7238 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0330 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 234,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0365 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0104 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3160 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 732,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,597 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,339 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6180 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,892 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2095

JPY

Japanese yen

132,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4494

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6646

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5445

ISK

Iceland króna

78,98

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5737

CZK

Czech koruna

30,038

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0548

ROL

Romanian leu

36 056

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,44

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,439

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6349

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5790

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4919

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3984

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7238

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0330

KRW

South Korean won

1 234,57

ZAR

South African rand

8,0365

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0104

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3160

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 732,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,597

PHP

Philippine peso

67,339

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6180

THB

Thai baht

49,892

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 2a.5 Contents of application; research projects in which drugs will be administered. ( a ) In addition to the information required by § 2a.4 and any other pertinent information which the Secretary may require, each application for an authorization of confidentiality for a research project which involves the administering of a drug shall contain: ( 1 ) Identification of the drugs to be administered in the research project and a description of the methods for such administration, which shall include a statement of the dosages to be administered to the research subjects;
( 2 ) Evidence that individuals who administer drugs are authorized to do so under applicable Federal and State law; and
( 3 ) In the case of a controlled drug, a copy of the Drug Enforcement Administration Certificate of Registration (BND Form 223) under which the research project will be conducted.
( b ) An application for an authorization of confidentiality with respect to a research project which involves the administering of a controlled drug may include a request for exemption of persons engaged in the research from State or Federal prosecution for possession, distribution, and dispensing of controlled drugs as authorized under section 502(d) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 872(d)) and 21 CFR 1316.22. If the request is in such form, and is supported by such information, as is required by 21 CFR 1316.22, the Secretary will forward it, together with his or her recommendation that such request be approved or disapproved, for the consideration of the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration.
§ 802.503 Beginning of 45-day review period. ( a ) The Staff Chairperson shall accept a voluntary notice the next business day after the Staff Chairperson has: ( 1 ) Determined that the notice complies with § 802.502;
( 2 ) Confirmed that the applicable fee required under subpart K of this part has been received by the Department of the Treasury, or waived; and
( 3 ) Disseminated the notice to all members of the Committee.
( b ) A 45-day period for review of a transaction shall commence on the date on which the voluntary notice has been accepted, agency notice has been received by the Staff Chairperson, or the Chairperson of the Committee has requested a notice under § 802.501(b). Such review shall end no later than the forty-fifth day after it has commenced, or if the forty-fifth day is not a business day, no later than the next business day after the forty-fifth day.
( c ) The Staff Chairperson shall promptly advise in writing all parties to a transaction that have filed a voluntary notice of: ( 1 ) The acceptance of the notice;
( 2 ) The date on which the review begins; and
( 3 ) The designation of any lead agency or agencies.
( d ) Within two business days after receipt of an agency notice by the Staff Chairperson, the Staff Chairperson shall send written advice of such notice to the parties to the transaction that is subject to the notice. Such written advice shall identify the date on which the review began.
( e ) The Staff Chairperson shall promptly circulate to all Committee members any draft pre-filing notice, any agency notice, any complete notice, and any subsequent information filed by the parties.
[85 FR 3166, Jan. 17, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 23742, Apr. 29, 2020]
**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

**[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

OR

**[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

Commission File Number 0-11176

**NTS-PROPERTIES III***(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)*

|                                       |                                            |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       | 10172 Linn Station Road                    |
| 61-1017240                            | Louisville, Kentucky 40223                 |
| *(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)* | *(Address of principal executive offices)* |

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(502) 426-4800

Georgia(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Title of each Class: None

Name of each exchange on which registered: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

|                               |  |      |
|-------------------------------|--|------|
| Limited partnership interests |  | None |
|                               |  |      |

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2942 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2942

 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent the canceling 
of annuities to certain divorced spouses of workers whose widows elect 
                     to receive lump sum payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1996

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent the canceling 
of annuities to certain divorced spouses of workers whose widows elect 
                     to receive lump sum payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Retirement Amendment Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF DIVORCED SPOUSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 6(c) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 
1974 is amended--
            (1) in the last sentence of paragraph (1), by inserting 
        ``(other than to a survivor in the circumstances described in 
        paragraph (3))'' after ``no further benefits shall be paid''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Notwithstanding the last sentence of paragraph (1), 
        benefits shall be paid to a survivor who--
                    ``(A) is a divorced wife; and
                    ``(B) through administrative error received 
                benefits otherwise precluded by the making of a lump 
                sum payment under this section to a widow;
        if that divorced wife makes an election to repay to the Board 
        the lump sum payment. The Board may withhold up to 10 percent 
        of each benefit amount paid after the date of the enactment of 
        this paragraph toward such reimbursement. The Board may waive 
        such repayment to the extent the Board determines it would 
        cause an unjust financial hardship for the beneficiary.''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this section 
shall apply with respect to any benefits paid before the date of 
enactment of this Act as well as to benefits payable on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex Parte Augusta Ceasar DICKEY. (Re: Augusta Ceasar Dickey v. State of Alabama).

80-80.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

SHORES, Justice.

Writ denied. No opinion.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                          0000725876
<NAME>                                         Gateway Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,618,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                         5,644,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,724,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             61,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,659,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,724,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (201,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (75,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (75,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (75,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)



</TABLE>
#### Timothy E. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. CLINTON, President of the United States, U.S. Court of Appeals Judges, Margaret Livingston, Deputy Clerk, USCA, Atlanta, GA, and Rhonda Steinberg, Deputy Clerk, USCA, Atlanta, GA, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-1576.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, BRYSON and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Timothy E. White responds to this court’s November 13, 2000 order regarding White’s appeal here and his identical appeal pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

In his response, White argues that dismissal is unwarranted and reiterates his request to hold this appeal in abeyance pending final disposition of his appeal with the D.C. Circuit from the same district court judgment. In White’s earlier request for a stay, he stated that he was moving to hold his appeal in this court in abeyance because “it is my understanding that I can only have one case on the same issue at anytime.”

In the memorandum order and judgment on review, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed Wkite’s complaint for failure to state a claim. The district court stated *882that the “crux of plaintiffs complaint is a request for this Court to review the dismissal of an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.” White also sought “treble damages under § 1983 in excess of ten million dollars.” The court stated that it was “without authority to review the decisions of which plaintiff complains” and it ruled that the President, judges, and court officials have immunity from liability for damages.

This appeal must be dismissed because it does not fall within the court’s jurisdiction. Nothing in this court’s jurisdictional mandate permits review of actions filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### § 599.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
# Eritrea

62 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Eritrea	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Other Release  		Secretary of State’s Determinations Under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 and Frank R. Wolf International Religious Freedom Act of 2016	  November 18, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 18, 2021	  Ned PriceOctober 18, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 5, 2021	  Ned PriceAugust 5, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 27, 2021	  Jalina PorterJuly 27, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Eritrea	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 5 of the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-441)	  July 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Eritrea	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		United States’ Actions To Press for the Resolution of the Crisis in the Tigray Region of Ethiopia	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 23, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Continuing Atrocities and Denial of Humanitarian Access in Ethiopia’s Tigray Region 	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 15, 2021 

previous page1234567next page

Back to Top
§ 584.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *Information or informational materials.* ( 1 ) The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to the importation from any country and the exportation to any country of any information or informational materials, as defined in § 584.304, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission.
( 2 ) This section does not exempt from regulation transactions related to information or informational materials not fully created and in existence at the date of the transactions, or to the substantive or artistic alteration or enhancement of information or informational materials, or to the provision of marketing and business consulting services. Such prohibited transactions include payment of advances for information or informational materials not yet created and completed (with the exception of prepaid subscriptions for widely circulated magazines and other periodical publications); provision of services to market, produce or co-produce, create, or assist in the creation of information or informational materials; and payment of royalties with respect to income received for enhancements or alterations made by U.S. persons to such information or informational materials.
( 3 ) This section does not exempt transactions incident to the exportation of software subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730-774, or to the exportation of goods (including software) or technology for use in the transmission of any data, or to the provision, sale, or leasing of capacity on telecommunications transmission facilities (such as satellite or terrestrial network connectivity) for use in the transmission of any data. The exportation of such items or services and the provision, sale, or leasing of such capacity or facilities to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a) are prohibited.
( c ) *Travel.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to transactions ordinarily incident to travel to or from any country, including importation or exportation of accompanied baggage for personal use, maintenance within any country including payment of living expenses and acquisition of goods or services for personal use, and arrangement or facilitation of such travel including nonscheduled air, sea, or land voyages.
( d ) *Humanitarian donations.* The prohibitions of this part do not apply to donations by United States persons of articles, such as food, clothing, and medicine, intended to be used to relieve human suffering.