alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Foreign Minister Lamamra of Algeria

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Foreign Minister Lamamra of Algeria							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 10, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Algerian Foreign Minister Ramtane Lamamra in Algiers.  The Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister welcomed the opportunity to hold the fifth U.S.-Algeria Strategic Dialogue to discuss a range of issues in the bilateral relationship.  They agreed on the importance of promoting regional stability, including support for ongoing UN-led diplomacy on the Western Sahara.  They also discussed Putin’s premeditated, unprovoked and unjustified attack on the people of Ukraine.  They agreed to expand academic exchanges and English language instruction in Algeria and advance diplomatic efforts for regional security. The Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister also discussed the importance of protecting human rights, including freedom of expression and freedom of belief.

Tags

AlgeriaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
# C_2005155EN.01002102.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 March 2005

in Case T-305/03 Opus Dent GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to give judgment)

(2005/C 155/42)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-305/03: Opus Dent GmbH, established in Freising (Germany), represented by P.J.A. Munzinger and S. Abel, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Agent: B. Müller), the intervener before the Court being Dornier MedTech Systems GmbH (formerly: Dornier Medizintechnik GmbH), established at Weβling (Germany), represented by J. Kroher and A. Hettenkofer, lawyers — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2003 (Case R 579/2002-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Opus Dent GmbH and Dornier MedTech Systems GmbH — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to give judgment on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to give judgment on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
HomeTajikistan

# Tajikistan

81 items

        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Tajikistan	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Tajikistan	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tajikistan	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu’s Travel to the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan	  May 22, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tajikistan	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Tajikistan	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Other Release  		Secretary of State’s Determinations Under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 and Frank R. Wolf International Religious Freedom Act of 2016	  November 18, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the C5+1 Ministerial during UNGA 76	  September 29, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement of the C5+1 on Addressing the Climate Crisis	  September 21, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Tajikistan Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 8, 2021 

previous page123456…9next page

Back to Top
**Exhibit 99.4**
**CFO CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Derek J. Kerr,the Chief Financial Officer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “***Company***”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
**1.     **The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.4 (the“***Periodic Report***”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) orsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
**2.     **The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 31stday of March, 2003.     /s/ Derek J. Kerr    Derek J. Kerr  Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to America West Holdings Corporation and will be retained by AmericaWest Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3068 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke 
 their charter of incorporation issued under the Indian Reorganization 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION OF THE PRAIRIE ISLAND 
              INDIAN COMMUNITY UNDER THE INDIAN REORGANIZATION ACT.

    The request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to surrender the 
charter of incorporation issued to that Community on July 23, 1937, 
pursuant to section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934, commonly known as 
the ``Indian Reorganization Act'' (25 U.S.C. 477) is hereby accepted 
and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
#### Henry E. Dreher, Respondent, *against*Patrick Connolly *et*al., Appellants.

(Decided April 7th, 1890.)

A judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover for goods sold for a liquor store, will not be reversed where there is evidence that defendants owned the saloon, and after their alleged sale to another permitted their firm name to be continued without any indication of change of ownership.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the City of New York for the Fourth Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*J. T.*Cornell, for appellants.

*N. S.*Levy, for respondent.

Bischoff, J.

Notwithstanding the positive denial by the defendants of the purchase of the merchandise for the recovery of the value of which this action was brought, there appears from the examination of the evidence sufficient to *107sustain a finding that at the time of the sale and delivery the defendants were the owners of the saloon at 310 Bowery, at which, and for the use of which, the merchandise was delivered, and that by permitting their firm name to be continued after the premises had passed into the possession of McGronigle without any indication of change of ownership, the plaintiff’s assignor was justified in assuming that defendants continued to be the owners at the time of the sale and delivery of the merchandise in question, and that thereby the defendants were estopped from denying that the sale was to them and upon their credit.

The appellate court will not reverse a judgment of the court below on a mere conflict of testimony, if there is sufficient evidence to support it, although on the whole evidence the appellate court might have arrived at a different conclusion (See *Fixman*v. Brown, 14 Daly 110; 3 N. Y. St. Rep’r 608).

L arremore, Ch. J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### Docket No. FAA**- 2011**  **- 1066** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  3/10/11 **Regional Airline Association Dave**  **Lotterer Connie**  **Arnold** 3/10/11

**Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  3/10/11 **ATA Joe White**  3/10/11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,802
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,148,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,172,634)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (32,511)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0)
        

</TABLE>
Document

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




    THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of March 9, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and between SolarWinds Worldwide, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”) and wholly-owned subsidiary of SolarWinds Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Sudhakar Ramakrishna (“Employee”). This Amendment amends the Employment Agreement (as defined below) on the terms set forth herein. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.
Recitals
WHEREAS, the Company and Employee each desire to amend each that certain Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee dated as of December 7, 2020, as amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of January 4, 2021 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), as set forth below effective as of the Effective Date.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company’s continued employment of Employee, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows, notwithstanding anything in the Employment Agreement to the contrary:
(a)In lieu of the initial grant of $3.5 million of PSUs to be made to Employee by Parent pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Employment Agreement, Parent shall grant Employee $7 million in the form of RSUs, which shall vest (i) 25% on February 15, 2022 and (ii) 6.25% in each quarter thereafter. 
(b)Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
(c)This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(d)In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall expressly control.
[Signature Page(s) Follows]


    1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the Effective Date set forth above:
						
	SOLARWINDS WORLDWIDE, LLC




By:  /s/ Jason Bliss     
Name:  Jason Bliss
Its: General Counsel
	EMPLOYEE




/s/ Sudhakar Ramakrishna    
Sudhakar Ramakrishna







    2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership II for
the year ended December 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
                                       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              70,895
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       51,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                        49,139
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   374,479
<PP&E>                                          10,196,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,396,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,420,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              796,705
<BONDS>                                          5,343,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,420,179
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,986,024
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,148,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 520,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (162,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (162,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (15.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- History.State.Gov

HomeForeign Service Institute...Contact Us – Foreign Service Institute

# 									Contact Us – Foreign Service Institute							

Foreign Service Institute

**Visiting Our Campus**The Foreign Service Institute’s (FSI) main campus is located at the George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center (NFATC). Learn more about getting to campus on our directions page.

**Government Training Opportunities**FSI courses are available on a reimbursable basis to U.S. Government employees of other agencies, including U.S. military personnel. Tuition rates are published annually. For more information on training opportunities, please visit **Foreign Service Institute Training.**See here for FSI training status update as of June 15, 2020.

**Partnership Opportunities with FSI**FSI draws upon an extensive network of external contacts to enhance our training and education. Our students and staff benefit from direct interaction with policy experts, academics, business leaders, and thought leaders. If you are interested in discussing non-monetary partnerships with FSI, please contact us at FSI-SCPU_Mailbox@state.gov**.**

**Media/Press Contacts**For media/press inquiries, please contact us at FSI-SCPU_Mailbox@state.gov**.**

**Business Opportunities**To learn more about current business opportunities with FSI, you can visit **www.fbo.gov** and search “Department of State/Foreign Service Institute” using the agency search function.

**Human Resources**For Human Resource related inquiries, please direct your message to **FSIEXHR@state.gov**.

Tags

Foreign Service Institute

Back to Top
§ 403.312 Submittal of application. The Chief Executive Officer of the State is responsible for— ( a ) Submittal of the application to CMS for approval; and
( b ) Supplying the assurances and necessary documentation as required under §§ 403.304 through 403.308.
§ 408.44 Deduction from civil service annuities. ( a ) *Responsibility for deductions.* If an enrollee is not entitled to railroad retirement benefits or social security benefits, and is receiving a civil service annuity, the premiums are deducted from that annuity by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on the basis of a notice from SSA indicating that the annuitant is entitled to SMI.
( b ) *Deduction of spouse's premiums.* If the annuitant's spouse is also enrolled for SMI and is not entitled to a civil service annuity or to social security or railroad retirement benefits, and the annuitant gives written consent, OPM also deducts the spouse's premium from the annuitant's monthly check.
( c ) *Withdrawal of annuitant's consent.* ( 1 ) If an annuitant wishes to withdraw consent for deduction of the spouse's premium, he or she must send written notice of withdrawal to OPM.
( 2 ) The withdrawal notice is effective with the third month after the month in which it is received, or with the month specified in the notice, whichever is later.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2987

To declare a portion of Queens County, New York, to be nonnavigable

waters of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1996

Mr. MANTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To declare a portion of Queens County, New York, to be

nonnavigable waters of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DECLARATION OF NONNAVIGABILITY FOR POR4 TION OF QUEENS COUNTY, NEW YORK.

5 (a) DESCRIPTION OF NONNAVIGABLE AREA.—Sub6 ject to subsections (b) and (c), that portion of Long Island

7 City, Queens County, New York, which is not submerged

8 and lies between the existing southerly high water line of

9 Anable Basin (also known as the 11th Street Basin) and

10 the existing northerly high water line of Newtown Creek
2

•HR 2987 IH

1 and extends from the existing high water line of the East

2 River to the original high water line of the East River

3 is declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.

4 (b) REQUIREMENT THAT AREAS BE IMPROVED.—

5 The declaration under subsection (a) shall apply only to

6 those portions of the areas described in subsection (a) that

7 are or will be bulkheaded or filled or otherwise occupied

8 by permanent structures or other permanent physical im9 provements, including park lands. All such work is subject

10 to applicable Federal statutes and regulations, including

11 sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C.

12 401 and 403), commonly known as the River and Harbor

13 Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal

14 Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the

15 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.

16 4321 et seq.).

17 (c) EXPIRATION DATE.—If, 20 years from the date

18 of the enactment of this Act, any area described in sub19 section (a) or part thereof is not bulkheaded or filled or

20 occupied by permanent structures or other permanent

21 physical improvements, including park lands, in accord22 ance with the requirements of subsection (b), or if work

23 is not commenced within 5 years after the issuance of any

24 permit required to be obtained under subsection (b), then
3

•HR 2987 IH

1 the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part

2 thereof shall expire.

Æ