alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Donald PORTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2040.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1979.

Mark King Leban and Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

ON RECONSIDERATION, PURSUANT TO REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the filing of our former opinion in this cause, see *Porter*v. *State,*356 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), the State of Florida petitioned for certiorari in the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded the cause, 364 So.2d 892, for further proceedings consistent with the recent decision of the Supreme Court in *Clark v. State,*363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978).

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court, we have allowed the filing of additional briefs by the appellant and the appel-lee, having heard argument, and have reached the conclusion that the Supreme Court’s decision in *Clark v. State,*supra, must be applied to this appeal and that the application of that decision to the facts of this case requires an affirmance of the decision of the trial court.

Accordingly, having found that no error is presented by the appeal of Donald Porter, defendant, our opinion in this cause filed March 7, 1978, and reported at 356 So.2d 1268, and the mandate of this court, issued April 21,1978, are withdrawn and the judg*706ment and sentence heretofore entered in the cause by the trial court are affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3460
<PP&E>                                          135964
<DEPRECIATION>                                   54973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   85585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9256
<BONDS>                                         103656
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (27326)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     85585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3131
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     90
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.78
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005181EN.01001201.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3783 — TPG/British Vita)

(2005/C 181/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 2

- 278 8

_____________________________ A LBERT W OOD , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ircuit Court for Dixie County

. Jennifer Jones Johnson , Judge

. June 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
SCIOS INC.
                                        AND SUBSIDIARIES
                               Computation of Net Loss Per Share

                               (Calculated in accordance with the
                                   guidelines of item 601 of
                                 Regulation S-K. The effect of
                                   stock options on loss per
                                    share is anti-dilutive)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Three months ended
                                                                    March 31,
                                                        1997                          1996
                                                  -----------------             -----------------
                                                                   (Unaudited)

<S>                                               <C>                           <C>    
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:
Average common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding                                  35,831,662                    35,890,504
                                                  -----------------             -----------------


Net gain (loss)                                       ($12,132,000)                  ($7,417,000)
                                                  -----------------             -----------------


Net loss per share                                          ($0.34)                       ($0.21)
                                                  -----------------             -----------------

</TABLE>
ROBERT DICK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2962

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed September 22, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark , Judge

.

Robert Dick, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney

Gen eral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
|   | EXHIBIT                  32.1 |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION                  PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION                  1350 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                  2002 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or                  15 (d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY                  /s/ Frank West                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Frank                  West               |
|   | Title:  Chief                  Executive Officer |
|   |  Date:  November                  8, 2007   |

----
#### § 137.43 May a Tribe negotiate and leave funds with IHS for retained services?

Yes, at the discretion of the Self-Governance Tribe, Tribal shares may be left, in whole or in part, with IHS for certain PSFAs. These shares are referred to as a “retained Tribal shares.”
# C_2005281EN.01001801.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/18

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2005 — Napoli Buzzanca v Commission

(Case T-218/02) (1)

1

(Officials - Post of director - Procedure to fill vacant posts - Decision rejecting a candidature - Statement of reasons)

(2005/C 281/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Daniela Napoli Buzzanca (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, Agents)

Defendant(s):

:

Application for

firstly, annulment of the decisions of the Commission of 30 January 2002 appointing Ms S. as director, in grade A2, of Directorate ‘Multilateral relations and human rights’ of the ‘External Relations’ Directorate-General and rejecting the applicant's candidature for that post, and annulment, to the extent necessary, of the implied rejection by the Commission of her complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations, secondly, an order that the defendant pay damages assessed, as at the date of the action and subject to possible increase, in the sum of EUR 23 213,96 and, finally, an order that the Commission produce her administrative file.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decisions of the Commission of 30 January 2002 appointing Ms S. to the post concerned by vacancy notice COM/156/01 and rejecting the applicant's candidature for that post. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decisions of the Commission of 30 January 2002 appointing Ms S. to the post concerned by vacancy notice COM/156/01 and rejecting the applicant's candidature for that post.

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the application. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the application.

| 3) | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 12.10.2002.

1

---
# C_2005287EN.01000501.xml

| 18.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/5

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.3916 — T-Mobile Austria/Tele.ring)

(2005/C 287/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 November 2005, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference No COMP/M.3916 — T-Mobile Austria/Tele.ring, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| BE-1049 Brussels |

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

BE-1049 Brussels

---
HomeQatar

# Qatar

214 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani	  July 9, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Qatar	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Feltman Visits Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kenya	  June 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani	  May 27, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani	  May 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Qatar	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani	  April 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 2, 2021	  Jalina PorterApril 2, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Qatar	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani	  March 2, 2021 

previous page1…171819202122next page

Back to Top
#### § 591.407 Settlement agreements and enforcement of certain orders through judicial process.

Notwithstanding the existence of any general license issued under this part, or issued under any Executive order issued pursuant to the national emergency declared in E.O. 13692, the entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 591.201, as referenced in § 591.506(c), is prohibited unless authorized pursuant to a specific license issued by OFAC pursuant to this part.

[84 FR 64417, Nov. 22, 2019]
#### Dorothy ZEIGLER, Appellant, v. Harry ZEIGLER, Appellee.

No. 73-639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 137.251. What obligation does the retroceding Self-Governance Tribe have with respect to returning property that was provided by the Secretary under the compact or funding agreement and that was used in the operation of the retroceded program?

On the effective date of any retrocession, the retroceding Self-Governance Tribe, shall, at the option of the Secretary, deliver to the Secretary all requested property and equipment provided by the Secretary under the compact or funding agreement, to the extent used to carry out the retroceded PSFAs, which at the time of retrocession has a per item current fair market value, less the cost of improvements borne by the Self-Governance Tribe in excess of $5,000 at the time of the retrocession.
From: Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com [mailto:Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:06 PM

To: Wozniak, Gerald

Subject: RE: SNAP

Gerald, the following is provided as DuPont confidential business information. 

Let me know if you have any questions.

From: Wozniak, Gerald [mailto:Wozniak.Gerald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:36 AM

To: PARR, MICHAEL S

Subject: Re: SNAP

Michael, 

We are currently reviewing your submissions, but just to make sure we are on the same page please 

clarify which segments you expect would be be first movers. Thanks,

Gerald 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 13, 2015, at 9:21 AM, "Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com" <Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com> wrote:

Gerald – just want to confirm that you have what you need from us in terms of those segments 

we anticipate being first movers for XP-10, 40 and 44.

Thanks
Michael Parr

North American Advocacy Manager

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

202-728-3617

Mobile 202-365-3056

This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains

information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under

applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby

formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,

in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by

return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly

and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does

not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance

of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the

use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for

transfers of data to third parties.

The dupont.com http://dupont.com web address may be used for a limited period of time by the 

following

divested businesses that are no longer affiliated in any way with DuPont:

Borealis Polymers NV

Jacob Holm & Sonner Holding A/S (Jacob Holm)

Kuraray Co., Ltd

DuPont accepts no liability or responsibility for the content or use of communications

sent or received on behalf of such divested businesses or for the consequences of

any actions taken on the basis of such communications.

Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean

http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
#### § 136.204 Authorization by an urban Indian organization.

An urban Indian organization may authorize for purchase items and services for an eligible urban Indian as those terms are defined in 25 U.S.C. 1603(f) and (h) according to section 503 of the IHCIA and applicable regulations. Services and items furnished by physicians and other health care professionals and non-hospital-based entities shall be subject to the payment methodology set forth in § 136.203.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT
TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Serge
Beausoleil., President & CEO of Viropro, Inc. (the “Company”) do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.  This
Annual Report on 10K/A of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date:
March 1, 2010.








/s/ Serge
Beausoleil


Serge
Beausoleil


President
& CEO








---
HomeYemen

# Yemen

313 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with UN Special Envoy for Yemen Grundberg	  October 12, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and UN Special Envoy for Yemen Hans Grundberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 10, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 26, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With George Stephanopoulos of Good Morning America on ABC	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 20, 2023New York City, New York 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Following the Ministerial Meeting of the United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)	  September 19, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, and United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 19, 2023Palace HotelNew York, New York 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Before His Meeting with Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council President Rashad al-Alimi	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Meeting with Foreign Ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council Member States	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council President al-Alimi	  September 18, 2023 

previous page1…34567…32next page

Back to Top
§ 137.47 Do any provisions of Title I apply to compacts, funding agreements, and construction project agreements negotiated under Title V of the Act? ( a ) Yes, the provisions of Title I listed in section 516(a) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-15(a)] and section 314 of Pub. L. 101-512, as amended, [25 U.S.C. 450f note] mandatorily apply to a compact, funding agreement and construction project agreement to the extent they are not in conflict with Title V. In addition, at the option of a Self-Governance Tribe, under section 516(b) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-15(b)] any provisions of Title I may be included in the compact or funding agreement.
( b ) The provisions of Title I referenced in section 516(a) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-15(a)] are sections 5 [25 U.S.C. 450c], 6 [25 U.S.C. 450d], 7 [25 U.S.C. 450e], 102(c) and (d) [25 U.S.C. 450f(c) and (d)], 104 [25 U.S.C. 450i], 105(k) and (l) [25 U.S.C. 450j(k) and (l)], 106(a) through (k) [25 U.S.C. 450j-1(a) through (k)], and 111 [25 U.S.C. 450n] of the Act.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROGER DAVENPORT,

Appellant,

v.

HERITAGE LANDINGS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Non-for-Profit 

Corp., ROSALIE BIANCO, an individual, FRANK E. KOSARICK 

REVOCABLE TRUST, and DAVID MARKS, an individual,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-2610

[July 6, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-019161.

Roger Davenport, Pompano Beach, pro se.

Gerard S. Collins of Kaye Bender Rembaum, P.L., Pompano Beach, for 

appellees Heritage Landings Association, Inc. and Rosalie Bianco.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J.., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.