alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Public Workshops and Hearings



# •

Search Help More Search Options

Search
EERE Information Center



# Public Workshops and Hearings Public Workshop on a Rulemaking to Consider Energy Efficiency Standards for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps The Department of Energy (Department) convened a public workshop to discuss and receive comments on issues it would address and the process it would follow in considering the adoption of energy conservation standards for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department prepared a Framework Document to explain and discuss the process, analyses and issues concerning the development of such standards. For many of the issues and analyses, the Framework Document set forth approaches that the Department considered.

The workshop was held on Monday, October 1, 2001 from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. in Room 1E-245 at the U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20585.

Background Information

Workshop Purpose The purpose of this public workshop was to hear the views of interested persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider updated energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department of Energy considered the views presented and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

Agenda The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Acrobat Reader

. 

### I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS II. AGENDA REVIEW III. COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION A. Introduction, ( PDF 240 KB ) B. Market and Technology Assessment, ( PDF 240 KB ) C. Screening Analysis, ( PDF 150 KB ) D. Engineering Analysis, ( PDF 181 KB ) 1. Equipment cost efficiency 2. Building load and energy saving analysis E. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, ( PDF 181 KB ) F. Consumer Subgroup Analysis, ( PDF 79 KB ) G. National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis, ( PDF 125 KB ) H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis, ( PDF 106 KB ) I. Employment Impact, ( PDF 75 KB ) J. Utility Impact Analysis, ( PDF 89 KB ) K. Environmental Analysis, ( PDF 79 KB ) 

### IV. ADJOURNMENT

Printable Version

file:///E|/Appliances%20&%20Commercial%20Equipment...ards%20Public%20Workshops%20and%20Hearings.2QQ.htm (1 of 2)11/8/2005 8:31:3 6 AMAppliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Public Workshops and Hearings



### Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated: 07/28/2004

file:///E|/Appliances%20&%20Commercial%20Equipment...ards%20Public%20Workshops%20and%20Hearings.2QQ.htm (2 of 2)11/8/2005 8:31:3 6 AM
#### § 137.133 What does a final offer contain?

A final offer contains a description of the disagreement between the Secretary and the Indian Tribe and the Indian Tribe's final proposal to resolve the disagreement.
#### § 560.312 Specific license.

The term *specific license* means any license or authorization not set forth in subpart E of this part but issued pursuant to this part.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–883 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO 

SUSPEND THE RULES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1500] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1500, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions that 

the House suspend the rules at any time through the calendar day 

of September 28, 2008. The Speaker or her designee shall consult 

with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any 

matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District 1

Judge for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 96-2316

___________

Barbara R. Burns, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

R.A. Ungerman Construction Co., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 26, 1996

 Filed: June 28, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, HENLEY, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Barbara R. Burns appeals from the District Court's denial of her

1

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. Upon careful review of the

record, we conclude the judgment of the District Court was correct.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 136.303 Indians applying for scholarships. ( a ) For purposes of scholarship grants under Subdivisions J-3 and J-4 of this subpart, Indian applicants must submit evidence of their tribal membership (or other evidence that that applicant is an Indian as defined in paragraph (h) of § 136.302 of this subdivision) satisfactory to the Secretary.
( b ) Where an applicant is a member of a tribe recognized by the Secretary of the Interior, the applicant must submit evidence of his or her tribal membership, such as: ( 1 ) Certification of tribal enrollment by the Secretary of the Interior acting through the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); or
( 2 ) In the absence of such BIA certification, documentation that the applicant meets the requirements of tribal membership as prescribed by the charter, articles of incorporation or other legal instrument of the tribe and has been officially designated a tribal member by an authorized tribal official; or
( 3 ) Other evidence of tribal membership satisfactory to the Secretary.
( c ) Where the applicant is a member of a tribe terminated since 1940 or a State recognized tribe, the applicant must submit documentation that the applicant meets the requirements of tribal membership as prescribed by the charter, articles of incorporation or other legal instrument of the tribe and has been officially designated a tribal member by an authorized tribal official; or other evidence, satisfactory to the Secretary, that the applicant is a member of the tribe. In addition, if the terminated or State recognized tribe of which the applicant is a member is not on a list of such tribes published by the Secretary in the Federal Register. the applicant must submit documentation as may be required by the Secretary that the tribe is a tribe terminated since 1940 or is recognized by the State in which the tribe is located in accordance with the law of that State.
( d ) An applicant who is not a tribal member, but who is a natural child or grandchild of a tribal member as defined in paragraph (h) of § 36.302 of this subdivision must submit evidence of such fact which is satisfactory to the Secretary, in addition to evidence of his or her parent's or grandparent's tribal membership in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
[42 FR 59646, Nov. 18, 1977. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002]
#### Larry J. NELUND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-900.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and E. Earl Taylor, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to file a Rule 3.850, R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A., motion.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
October 17, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with Power/Utilities America Group of the Global Infrastructure Group, 

at Moody’s Rating Agency 

Attendees: 

Joseph Goffman, EPA/OAR/ OAA/OPMO 

Ellen Kurlansky, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPAR 

Jim Hempstead, SVP Infrastructure 

A.J. Sabatelle, SVP Infrastructure 

Mitchell Moss, Analyst – Utilities 

Bill Hunter, VP Senior Analyst - Infrastructure 

Clifford Kim, VP – Sr. Analyst – Project Finance 

Ayesha Gopal, Associate - Utilities 

Franklin Sherman, Associate – Infrastructure 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the historical background and practical implications of the 

Cross-state Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS).
CONTINENTAL REALTY ADVISORS, LTD.
                           3801 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE
                                  SUITE 400 
                               DENVER, CO  80210
                           TELEPHONE (303) 691-2941
                           FACSIMILE (303) 691-6018

                              November 6, 1997

Chandler Investors, an Illinois limited partnership
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, IL  60015

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter pertains to, and is intended to constitute an amendment of,
the Agreement of Sale (the "Agreement") entered into as of May 22, 1997 between
Continental Realty Advisors, Ltd., a Colorado limited partnership Signet
Partners, a Colorado corporation (collectively referred to as "Purchaser") and
Chandler Investors, an Illinois limited partnership ("Seller").  By prior
instruments, the most recent of which is entitled the "Sixth Amendment to
Agreement Of Sale and Escrow Agreement", Purchaser and Seller have amended the
Agreement.  Pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, certain deadlines for performance
or satisfaction of conditions were extended.  One of those deadlines was for
the satisfaction or waiver of the Purchaser's financing contingency.  That
provision is set forth in paragraph two of the Sixth Amendment, and it pertains
to paragraph 7.1A of the Agreement.  The current deadline for satisfaction or
waiver of the Purchaser's financing contingency is 5:00 p.m. Chicago time,
November 6, 1997.  By our mutual signing of this letter, it is agreed that the
deadline for satisfaction or waiver of the financing contingency is hereby
extended for one day, to 5:00 p.m. Chicago time, November 7, 1997.

     In all other respects the Agreement, as previously amended by the First
through Sixth Amendments to Agreement of Sale and Escrow Agreement, shall
remain unchanged, and in full force and effect.

     Kindly acknowledge your assent to these provisions by signing a copy of
this letter at the space provided below, and returning it to me by facsimile
transmission at the facsimile number indicated above.  I will then forward a
copy of the Escrow Agent to advise it of the amendment hereby enacted.

                         Very truly yours,

                         PURCHASER:

                         CONTINENTAL REALTY ADVISORS, LTD.

                         By:  /s/ David W. Snyder, President
                                 ----------------------------
                                  David W. Snyder, President
<PAGE>
                         SELLER:

                         Chandler Investors, LLP

                         By:  /s/ Michael J. Becker
                                --------------------
                                  Michael J. Becker
                                  Managing Director

ACKNOWLEDGED:

ESCROW AGENT:

NEAR NORTH NATIONAL TITLE CORPORATION

By:
      -------------------------------
<PAGE>
AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

	This Amended Employment Agreement ("Amended Agreement") is made as of the twenty-sixth day of January, 2001, by and between MOTO PHOTO, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Employer"), and LLOYD F. NOLAND ("Employee"). This Amended Agreement is based onthe following understandings:

	(a) The parties entered into an Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") as of January 1, 1999.

	(b) Employer has notified Employee pursuant to Sections 9 and 10.3 of the Agreement that it is terminating his employment without cause effective December 28, 2000.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Henry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer, PHI Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of PHI Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.PHI GROUP, INC.

/s/ Henry FahmanHenry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer

Dated: July 8, 2010 

 

----
From: Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com [ mailto:Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com ]

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:06 PM

To: Wozniak, Gerald

Subject: RE: SNAP

Gerald, the following is provided as DuPont confidential business information.

Let me know if you have any questions.

From: Wozniak, Gerald [ mailto:Wozniak.Gerald@epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:36 AM

To: PARR, MICHAEL S

Subject: Re: SNAP

Michael,

We are currently reviewing your submissions, but just to make sure we are on the same page please

clarify which segments you expect would be be first movers. Thanks,

Gerald

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 13, 2015, at 9:21 AM, " Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com " < Michael.S.Parr@dupont.com > wrote:

Gerald

– just want to confirm that you have what you need from us in terms of those segments

we anticipate being first movers for XP

- 10, 40 and 44.

ThanksMichael Parr

North American Advocacy Manager

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

202

- 728

- 3617

Mobile 202

- 365

- 3056

This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains

informa tion that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under

applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby

formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e

- mail,

in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by

return e

- mail and delete this e

- mail from your system. Unless explicitly

and conspicuously designated as "E

- Contract Intended", this e

- mail does

not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance

of a contract off er. This e

- mail does not constitute a consent to the

use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for

transfers of data to third parties.

The dupont.com http://dupo nt.com web address may be used for a limited period of time by the

following

divested businesses that are no longer affiliated in any way with DuPont:

Borealis Polymers NV

Jacob Holm & Sonner Holding A/S (Jacob Holm)

Kuraray Co., Ltd

DuPont accepts no liab ility or responsibility for the content or use of communications

sent or received on behalf of such divested businesses or for the consequences of

any actions taken on the basis of such communications.

Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanes e Chinese Korean

http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
#### § 137.362 May construction project agreements be amended?

Yes, the Self-Governance Tribe, at its discretion, may request the Secretary to amend a construction project agreement to include additional projects. In addition, amendments are required if there is a significant change from the original scope of work or if funds are added by the Secretary. The Self-Governance Tribe may make immaterial changes to the performance period and make budget adjustments within available funding without an amendment to the construction project agreement.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Rebecca Nation, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2008.



/s/ Rebecca Nation

Rebecca Nation

Chief Financial Officer
#### Akbar Consulting Corp. v. M. J. Kelley Co.

Case No. 58057

Cuyahoga County, (8th)

Decided February 15, 1990

[Cite as 1 AOA 302]

*For plaintiff-appellee, Edward W. Miller, Attorney at Law, 50 Public Square, 400 Terminal Tower, Cleveland, Ohio 44113.*

*For defendant-appellants, John F. Seelie, Attorney at Law, 800 Baker Building, 1940 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44114.*

*

 Thomas J. Parrino, retired judge of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

*PER CURIAM*

This cause came on to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App. R. 11.1 and Loe. R. 25, the records from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, the briefs and the oral arguments of counsel. The record reveals that the parties herein entered into a stipulated dismissal at defendants' coast. Thereafter, defendants-appellants ceased making payments on the settlement. The plaintiff-appellee moved for execution on the amount prayed in the complaint less any any payments made pursuant to the settlement. The court, without an evidentiary hearing, granted plaintiff-appellee's motion.

The terms of the settlement were not made a part of the record, even though a settlement was reached in a conference in the court's chambers and the court memorialized what is purported to be the settlement's terms on a case file card maintained by the court. *See,*appellee's brief, Exhibit "A," entry for September 22,1986 (Copy attached as appendix to opinion). This card is not a part of the record, having not been filed with the case, and will not be considered by this court.

Where parties to an action voluntarily enter into a settlement agreement, the agreement is a binding contract and may be enforced. *Spercel*v. *Sterling Industries*(1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 36. The appellant was entitled to a hearing on the matter since the settlement's terms, which are in dispute, were not part of the record. *See, Bolen*v. *Young*(1982), 8 Ohio App. 3d 36, 37.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the matter remanded for a hearing on appellee's motion to enforce the settlement. Such hearing is to be conducted by a judge who was not the trial court judge in the case below so that the original judge is free to testify as a witness at the hearing.

*Judgment reversed and remanded.*

This cause is reversed and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ordered that appellants recover of appellee their costs herein taxed.

The Court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution.

BLANCH EKRUPANSKY, P.J.

FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, J.

THOMAS J. PARRINO, J.*