alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40587.

#### FAIR v. THE STATE.

Decided November 4, 1964

Rehearing denied November 17, 1964.

*Oliver, Oliver & Gunter, Jack N. Gunter,*for plaintiff in error.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The judgment of this court *[Fair v. State,*109 Ga. App. 746, 137 SE2d 378), dismissing the writ of error, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia *(Fair v. State,*220 Ga. 326, 138 SE2d 653), the judgment of this court is vacated.

2. In *Wilson v. State,*215 Ga. 775 (113 SE2d 607), the Supreme Court held: “The Act of 1945 (Ga. L. 1945, p. 145; *Code Ann.*§ 81-1501), vesting in the Supreme Court the power to prescribe rules of procedure and practice when ratified by the General Assembly, did not authorize the court to prescribe rules of procedure, pleadings and practice in the trial of criminal cases.” In that case it was held that there was no authority for the trial court to entertain a motion for a judgment notwithstanding a verdict in a criminal case. And there is no authority for the filing of a single motion for new trial complaining of multiple convictions under several indictments by the same jury (see *Dickey v. State,*101 Ga. 572, 28 SE 980), although a single bill of exceptions may be filed to the overruling of separate motions for new trial in such cases under the ruling of the Supreme Court in this case. The motion for new trial should have been dismissed. “Since the court was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion for new trial and should have dismissed it, the order overruling it was not harmful to the movant and therefore was not error.” *Johnson v. Housing Authority of the City of Marietta,*106 Ga. App. 739 (128 SE2d 379).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
#### In re ADOPTION OF K. A. M., a Minor.

No. 78-1395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 23, 1979.

Ben L. Bryan, Jr., Fort Pierce, for appellants.

Joe Horn Mount of Peavyhouse, Giglio, Grant, Clark, Charlton & Mount, Tampa, for appellees.

GRIMES, Chief Judge.

K.A.M. is five years old. Her parents died in an automobile accident three years ago. The appellees, the child’s maternal aunt and her husband, have taken care of K.A.M. since that time under an order of guardianship. The guardianship order permitted appellants, the child’s paternal grandparents, to have visitation rights.

Appellees subsequently filed a petition to adopt K.A.M. Appellants opposed the adoption, not on grounds of the unfitness of appellees, but simply because they wished to maintain the status quo. The court approved the adoption by appellees but awarded appellants rights of visitation.

There is ample competent and substantial evidence supporting the order of adoption. However, on the cross-appeal we find it necessary to reverse the order granting appellants visitation rights. In *Jones v. Allen,*277 So.2d 599, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), this court held that, following adoption by maternal grandparents, even the natural father no longer retained the right to visit the adopted child. We stated:

> Although the new parents are perfectly free to allow anyone they wish to visit their daughter we can find no legal authority for compelling them to do so once the final adoption is entered.

*Accord, Roberts v. Davis,*328 So.2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

The newly enacted Ch. 78-5, Laws of Florida, does not contain authority for visitation rights in adoption cases. The first section of this bill1 pertains only to custody matters in dissolution proceedings, and the second section2 is totally inapplicable to the facts of this case. As deserving as appellants may be, the determination of whether they shall continue to see their granddaughter must rest with the good judgment of appellees.

The order of adoption is affirmed, but the right of visitation accorded appellants is hereby stricken.

OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

1

. Now incorporated into Section 61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.).

2

. Now Section 68.08, Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.).
§ 35.13 Entry for negotiation of release or settlement. ( a ) No person shall be permitted to enter a station or hospital of the Service for the purpose of negotiating a settlement or obtaining a general or special release or statement from any patient with reference to any illness or personal injury for which the patient is receiving care or treatment, or for the purpose of conferring with him as an attorney or representative of an attorney with reference to such illness or injury, unless the patient has signified his willingness to have such person enter for such purpose and, in the judgment of the officer in charge, the physical or mental condition of the patient will not thereby be impaired.
( b ) Any person entering a station or hospital for a purpose enumerated in paragraph (a) of this section shall register in the manner prescribed by the officer in charge, and shall furnish for the records of the station or hospital the name of each patient by whom he has been received for such a purpose.
HomeBiographies...Shelby Smith-Wilson

# 				Shelby Smith-Wilson			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs												

				March 11, 2024 -									Present							

Ms. Smith-Wilson is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service and is currently the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of International Narcotics & Law Enforcement Affairs.  She most recently served as the Deputy Director of the Foreign Service Institute.  Previously she was the Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.  Other leadership assignments include Deputy Director of the State Department’s Operations Center, Political Counselor at U.S. Embassy Madrid, and Political Counselor at U.S. Embassy Panama.  She has also served overseas in Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Kenya.  

Ms. Smith-Wilson joined the Foreign Service after interning at U.S. Embassy Caracas as a Thomas Pickering Graduate Foreign Affairs Fellow.  She holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, an M.A. in International Affairs from The George Washington University, and a B.A. in Political Science and Spanish from Duke University.

In 2020, she was named a Leadership Fellow by the International Women’s Forum.  She is the recipient of the State Department’s Distinguished Honor Award and several Superior Honor Awards.  

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsState Department Official

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Document

        

Exhibit 10.58
CHICO’S FAS, INC.


RETENTION CASH AWARD AGREEMENT
 
<<Name>>
 (“Participant”)


 


This Retention Cash Award (“RCA”) Agreement (“Agreement”) is made on March 8, 2021 (“Award Date”), by Chico’s FAS, Inc. (“Company”) to Participant. 
 
1.     Retention Cash Award.    Subject to the restrictions, limitations, terms and conditions specified in this Agreement, the Company hereby awards to the Participant as of the Award Date a


 Retention Cash Award (RCA) of $<<xx>>
which vests as follows:


100% on March 1, 2022 (the “Vesting Date”)
This RCA will remain restricted until the Vesting Date ("Vesting Date").  Prior to the Vesting Date, the RCA is not transferable by the Participant by means of sale, assignment, exchange, pledge, or otherwise.
2.    Distribution of the Award.    The RCA will be earned on the Vesting Date and will be delivered via direct deposit to the Participant as soon as practicable after the Vesting Date in March 2022.  The award is subject to tax withholdings and shall be payable by the Company’s Payroll Department.
  
3.    Death or Total Disability.    If you cease active employment with the Company because of your death or total disability, (as defined under the Chico’s FAS, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan), a pro-rata award will vest immediately.  The value of the award will be calculated using the period of active service from the Award Date, through the date of death or total disability.  The pro-rated award will be distributed to you or your estate, within 60 days following your date of termination due to death or total disability.  


4.    Termination of Employment.  If your employment terminates (i.e., you voluntarily terminate your employment with the Company or your employment is terminated by the Company) prior to the Vesting Date, then this RCA shall be canceled on the date of your termination of employment. 


5.    Acceptance.  Your signature below will constitute your acceptance of this RCA and that you agree to be bound by all of the terms of this Agreement.


6.     No Rights to Continued Employment.  Nothing in this Agreement confers any right on you to continue in the employ of the Company or affects in any way the right of the Company to terminate your employment with or without prior written notice at any time for any reason.


7.      Administration.  This Retention Cash Award Agreement shall be administered by the EVP, Chief Human Resources Officer who will approve the payment due under this Agreement.


 
By:




___________________________________________________        
<<Name>> and Date
 


By:


______________________________________________________              
Chico’s FAS, Inc. and Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         402,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               576,418
<PP&E>                                       2,772,703
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,923,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,425,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,425,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,425,720
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,676
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 137.178 May Self-Governance Tribes store patient records at the Federal Records Centers?

Yes, at the option of a Self-Governance Tribe, patient records may be stored at Federal Records Centers to the same extent and in the same manner as other Department patient records in accordance with section 105(o) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j(o)].
§ 136.106 Grant award and evaluation. ( a ) Within the limits of funds determined by the Secretary to be available for such purpose, the Secretary may award grants under this subpart to applicants whose project will, in the judgment of the Secretary, best promote the purposes of the Act, and the regulations of this subpart, taking into account: ( 1 ) The apparent capability of the applicant to organize and manage the proposed project successfully considering, among other things the adequacy of staff, management systems, equipment and facilities.
( 2 ) The soundness of the applicant's plan for conducting the project and for assuring effective utilization of grant funds.
( 3 ) The adequacy of the budget in relation to the scope of the project and available funds.
( 4 ) The relative effectiveness of the applicant's plan, as set forth in the application, to carry out each of the requirements § 136.105.
( 5 ) The compatibility of the proposed project with the published goals and responsibilities of the IHS in carrying out its statutory mission.
( b ) The Notice of Grant Awards specifies how long the Secretary intends to support the project period without requiring the project to re-compete for funds. This period, called the project period, will usually be for one to two years. The total project period comprises the original project period and any extension. Generally the grant will be for a one-year budget period, any subsequent award will also be a one-year budget period. A grantee must submit a separate application for each subsequent year. Decisions regarding continuation awards and the funding level of such awards will be made after consideration of such factors as the grantee's progress and management practices, and the availability of funds. In all cases, awards require a determination by the Secretary that funding is in the best interest of the Federal Government.
( c ) Neither the approval of any application nor the award of any grant commits or obligates the Federal Government in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation or other award with respect to any approved application or portion of an approved application.
[40 FR 53143, Nov. 14, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 1854, Jan. 14, 1985. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002]
#### § 586.305 Publicly traded securities.

The term *publicly traded securities* includes any *security,* as defined in section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Public Law 73-291 (as codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10)), denominated in any currency that trades on a securities exchange or through the method of trading that is commonly referred to as *over-the-counter,* in any jurisdiction.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1538

DUNCAN BASS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 024071-16)

Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duncan Bass, Appellant Pro Se. Ellen Page DelSole, Douglas Campbell Rennie, Tax 

Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Duncan Bass appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s 

determination of a deficiency with respect to his 2013 income tax. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

tax court. Bass v. Comm’r of Internal Rev., Tax Ct. No. 024071-16 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 23, 

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005278EN.01001702.xml

| 11.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3947 — Svitzer/Wilhelmsen Offshore/JV)

(2005/C 278/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 October 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3947. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3947. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 800.507 Commencement of investigation. ( a ) If it is determined that an investigation should be undertaken, such investigation shall commence no later than the end of the review period described in § 800.503.
( b ) An official of the Department of the Treasury shall promptly inform the parties to a covered transaction in writing of the commencement of an investigation.
#### § 137.361 Does the Secretary have any other opportunities to approve planning or design documents prepared by the Self-Governance Tribe?

Yes, but only if there is an amendment to the construction project agreement that results in a significant change in the original scope of work.
# C_2005310EN.01000301.xml

| 8.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 December 2005

(2005/C 310/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1710 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4493 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67690 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3949 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5401 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 76,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9556 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5733 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,986 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6971 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8384 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6536 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,820 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5898 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5686 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3626 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0806 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6585 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9757 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3918 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4583 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 516,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,426 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,222 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,384 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1710

JPY

Japanese yen

141,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4493

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67690

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3949

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5401

ISK

Iceland króna

76,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9556

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5733

CZK

Czech koruna

28,986

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6971

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8384

RON

Romanian leu

3,6536

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,820

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5898

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5686

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3626

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0806

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6585

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9757

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,52

ZAR

South African rand

7,3918

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4583

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 516,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,426

PHP

Philippine peso

63,222

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9380

THB

Thai baht

48,384

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeVietnam

# Vietnam

		Environment		

191 items

        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 
        -    Report  		Vietnam	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Vietnam	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Vietnam	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Vietnam	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (16-707) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 7, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (16-524) – Cultural Cooperation Agreement Concerning the Program of the Peace Corps in Viet Nam	  May 24, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (14-1230) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  December 30, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (14-1003) – Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy	  October 3, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Vietnam (13-509) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  May 9, 2013 

previous page1…1415161718…20next page

Back to Top
#### § 1008.3 Effective period.

The provisions in this part are applicable to requests for advisory opinions submitted on or after February 21, 1997, and before August 21, 2000, and to any requests submitted during any other time period for which the OIG is required by law to issue advisory opinions.