45852 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Notices 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to Whom Do I Submit 

Comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an e-mail 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the http://www.regulations.gov 

Web site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, e-mail address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an e-mail comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov, 

your e-mail address is automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the official 

public docket, and made available in 

EPA’s electronic public docket. 

Dated: September 1, 2009. 

Richard B. Ossias, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. E9–21400 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8952–9] 

Notice of Proposed Settlement 

Agreement and Opportunity for Public 

Comment: Coeburn Produce Disposal 

Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

122(i) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation 

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended 

(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice 

is hereby given of a Proposed Settlement 

Agreement and Administrative Order, 

Docket No. CERC–03–2009–0076CR 

(Proposed Settlement Agreement), that 

is intended to resolve the potential 

liability under CERCLA of two parties 

for response costs incurred by EPA and 

the United States Department of Justice 

on behalf of EPA, in connection with 

the Coeburn Produce Disposal Site, 

Coeburn, Wise County, Virginia (Site). 

DATES: Written comments on the 

Proposed Settlement Agreement must be 

received by October 5, 2009. 

ADDRESSES. Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket No. CERC–03– 

2009–0076–CR, by mail to: Docket Clerk 

(3RC00), United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103–2029. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Van Orden (3RC42), Office of 

Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA, 1650 Arch 

Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029, 

telephone: (215) 814–2693, fax number 

(215) 814–2603 e-mail address: 

Vanorden.james@epa.gov. 

Maria Goodine (3HS62), U.S. EPA, 

1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 

19103–2029, telephone: (215) 814–2488, 

fax number (215) 814–2603, e-mail 

address: Goodine.maria@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Settlement Agreement 

Notice is hereby given of a Proposed 

Settlement Agreement and 

Administrative Order, Docket No. 

CERC–03–2009–0076CR, among the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Fuller Investments, Inc. and the 

Town of Coeburn, that has been 

approved, subject to public comment, 

pursuant to Section 122(h)(1) of 

CERCLA. The Proposed Settlement 

Agreement was signed by the Director of 

the Hazardous Site Cleanup Division, 

EPA Region III, on August 5, 2009. The 

Proposed Settlement Agreement 

provides for recovery of $185,000.00 

from Fuller Investments, Inc., which 

represents approximately 7.11% of the 

$2,600,864.50 in costs incurred by EPA 

and the U.S. Department of Justice on 

behalf of EPA in connection with the 

Site. The Town of Coeburn will not 

make any payment, but will be required 

to impose institutional controls at the 

Site and to maintain the remedy at the 

Site. 

The Environmental Protection Agency 

will receive written comments on the 

Proposed Settlement Agreement for a 

period of thirty (30) days from the date 

of publication of this Notice. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the Proposed 

Settlement Agreement if the comments 

disclose facts or considerations that 

indicate that such consent is 

inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or 

inconsistent with the requirements of 

CERCLA. Unless EPA or the Department 

of Justice determines, based on any 

comments which may be submitted, that 

consent to the Proposed Settlement 

Agreement should be withdrawn, the 

terms of the agreement will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed 

Settlement Agreement 

A. How Can I Get A Copy of the 

Proposed Settlement Agreement? 

A copy of the Proposed Settlement 

Agreement can be obtained from the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, Office of Regional 

Counsel (3RC00), 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103–2029 

by contacting James Van Orden, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, at (215) 

814–2693, or via e-mail at 

Vanorden.James@epa.gov. It is 

important to note that it is EPA’s policy 

to make public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

available to the public, unless the 

comment contains copyrighted material, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 171 / Friday, September 4, 2009 / Notices 45853 

CBI, or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

B. How and To Whom Do I Submit 

Comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and e-mail 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment. This ensures 

that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment. If 

EPA cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Dated: August 28, 2009. 

Paul Leonard, 

Acting Director, Hazardous Site Cleanup 

Division, Region III. 

[FR Doc. E9–21397 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8952–7] 

Adequacy Status of the Metropolitan 

Washington DC Area (DC–MD–VA) 

Area 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment 

Area’s Reasonable Further Progress 

Plan Vehicle Emission Budgets for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that we have found 

the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(MVEBs) in the 2008 Reasonable Further 

Progress (RFP) Plan, submitted on June 

4, 2007, by the Maryland Department of 

the Environment (MDE) and on June 12, 

2007 by the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality (VADEQ) and 

the District of Columbia Department of 

the Environment (DCDOE) are adequate 

for transportation conformity purposes. 

As a result of EPA’s finding, the 

Metropolitan Washington, DC area must 

use the MVEBs from the 2008 RFP Plan 

for future conformity determinations for 

the 8-hour ozone standard. 

DATES: These MVEBs are effective 

September 21, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Martin Kotsch, U.S. EPA, Region III, 

1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 

19103 at (215) 814–3335 or by e-mail at: 

kotsch.martin@EPA.gov. The finding is 

available at EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ 

stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. The word 

‘‘budgets’’ refers to the motor vehicle 

emission budgets for volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides 

(NOx). The word ‘‘SIP’’ in this 

document refers to the RFP Plan for the 

Metropolitan Washington DC 8-hour 

Ozone Nonattainment Area submitted to 

EPA as SIP revisions on June 4 and June 

12, 2007. 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that EPA has 

already made. EPA sent a letter to MDE, 

VADEQ and DCDOE on July 29, 2009 

stating that the MVEBs in the RFP Plan 

are adequate for transportation 

conformity purposes. As a result of 

EPA’s finding, the State of Maryland, 

the Commonwealth of Virginia and the 

District of Columbia must use the 

MVEBs from the 2008 RFP Plan for 

future conformity determinations for the 

8-hour ozone standard. This finding has 

also been announced on EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ 

transconf/pastsips.htm. The adequate 

MVEBs are provided in the following 

table: 

WASHINGTON D.C. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS

Nonattainment area 

2008 Reasonable Further 

Progress 

VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd) 

Washington D.C. ...................................................................................................................................................... 70.8 159.8 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, 

as amended in 1990. EPA’s conformity 

rule requires that transportation plans, 

programs and projects conform to state 

air quality implementation plans and 

establishes the criteria and procedure 

for determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

Budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4). Please note that an 

adequacy review is separate from EPA’s 

completeness review, and it also should 

not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate 

approval of the SIP. Even if we find a 

budget adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. We have described our 

process for determining the adequacy of 

submitted SIP budgets in 40 CFR 

93.118(f), and have followed this rule in 

making our adequacy determination. 

Dated: August 21, 2009. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. E9–21396 Filed 9–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information Collection 

Being Reviewed by the Federal 

Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

09/01/2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES