alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                    THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               CYTOGEN CORPORATION


     CYTOGEN  CORPORATION,  a corporation  organized  and existing  under and by
virtue  of  the  General   Corporation   Law  of  the  State  of  Delaware  (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

     FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted the following
resolutions  on May 5, 2005 with respect to the  amendment  and  restatement  of
Paragraph  A of  Article  Fifth of the  Corporation's  Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation, as amended (the "Charter Amendment"):

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  BE IT RESOLVED,  that Paragraph A of Article Fifth of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, be amended in its entirety to
read as follows:

     "FIFTH:  A. Total Capital Stock.  The total number of shares of all classes
of  capital  stock  which  the  Corporation  shall  have  authority  to issue is
FIFTY-FIVE  MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND  (55,400,000)  shares,  of which FIFTY
MILLION  (50,000,000)  shall be shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
(the "Common Stock");  and FIVE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND (5,400,000) shares
shall be Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share ("Preferred Stock")."

     SECOND:  That  said  Charter  Amendment  was duly  adopted  by the Board of
Directors and by the  stockholders  of the  Corporation  in accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly elected President on this 15th day of June, 2005.

                                        CYTOGEN CORPORATION



                                        By: /s/ Michael D. Becker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael D. Becker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Docket No. FAA-2012-1074
# C_2005309EN.01000101.xml

| 7.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 December 2005

(2005/C 309/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1783 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4504 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67905 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3862 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5410 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 76,26 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9561 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5734 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,941 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6971 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8313 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6560 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,54 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,795 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5961 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5644 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3607 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1366 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6417 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9876 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4248 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5183 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3925 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 694,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,455 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,534 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0670 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,744 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1783

JPY

Japanese yen

142,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4504

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67905

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3862

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5410

ISK

Iceland króna

76,26

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9561

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5734

CZK

Czech koruna

28,941

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6971

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8313

RON

Romanian leu

3,6560

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,54

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,795

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5961

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5644

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3607

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1366

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6417

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9876

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,72

ZAR

South African rand

7,4248

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5183

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3925

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 694,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,455

PHP

Philippine peso

63,534

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0670

THB

Thai baht

48,744

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John L. FORD, Appellee.

Nos. 74-634-74-636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 10.3


 


RIDGEFIELD ACQUISITION CORP.


FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”),
dated as of November 1, 2020, is entered into by Ridgefield Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”)
and Steven N. Bronson, an individual residing in California (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder are parties to that certain
Promissory Note, dated as of December 31, 2016 (the “Promissory Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder desire to amend the Promissory
Note to increase the maximum aggregate unpaid Principal Amount of all outstanding advances (the “Maximum Credit Amount”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed by each party
hereto as follows:


 


Amendment to the Promissory Note. It is hereby agreed and understood
that the Promissory Note shall be amended as follows:


 


Maximum Credit Amount.


 


The Maximum Credit Amount as described in the first
paragraph of the Promissory Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety from a threshold of $250,000 to the new threshold
of $500,000.


 


Miscellaneous.


 


A. Except as expressly amended and modified by this
Amendment, the Promissory Note is and shall continue to be in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof.


 


B. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto
in counterparts, and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.


 


C. The Amendment shall be construed in accordance
and governed by the internal laws of the state of California.


 


D. The headings contained in this Amendment are for
ease of reference only and shall not be considered in construing this Amendment.


 


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank;
Signature Page to Follow]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First
Amendment to the Revolving Promissory Note to duly executed as of the day and year first written above.


 


 


	BORROWER:	 
	 	 
	RIDGEFIELD ACQUISITION CORP	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steven N. Bronson	 
	Name:	Steven N. Bronson	 
	Its:	President & CEO	 
	 	 
	 	 
	HOLDER:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steven N. Bronson	 
	Name:	Steven N. Bronson
#### § 800.402 Voluntary declarations.

Except as otherwise prohibited under § 800.403(e), a party to any proposed or completed transaction may submit to the Committee a declaration regarding the transaction in accordance with the procedures and requirements set forth in §§ 800.403 and 800.404 instead of a written notice.
HomeKyrgyzstan

# Kyrgyzstan

96 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the United States-Kyrgyz Republic Annual Bilateral Consultations	  April 7, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kyrgyz Republic	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the C5+1 Ministerial in Astana	  March 9, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Kyrgyz Republic Foreign Minister Kulubaev	  February 28, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Kyrgyz Republic Foreign Minister Jeenbek Kulubaev Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 28, 2023The Ritz-CarltonAstana, Kazakhstan 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Kyrgyz Republic	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Welcomes Kyrgyzstan’s Repatriation of Nationals from Northeast Syria	  Ned PriceFebruary 20, 2023 
        -    		One New Assisted School in 2022-2023	  November 10, 2022 
        -    		C5+1 Joint Statements and Releases	   
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the C5+1 Meeting during UNGA 77	  September 28, 2022 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50369

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alexi Lenin Argueta-Urbina, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-1087-1

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Alexi Lenin Argueta-Urbina appeals the 57-month, within guidelines 

range sentence imposed after his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry by 

a removed alien, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Argueta-Urbina contends 

that his sentence is unconstitutional because § 1326(b)(1), which was used to 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 19, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50369 Document: 00516060883 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
No. 21-50369

2

enhance his sentence based on his having been previously deported following 

a conviction for a felony offense, is no longer valid in light of the United States 

Supreme Court’s decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), 

and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013). Argueta-Urbina concedes 

that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 

224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for future review. The 

Government moves for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an 

extension of time in which to file a merits brief.

The parties are correct that Argueta-Urbina’s argument is foreclosed 

by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th 

Cir. 2014) (“We recently acknowledged that the Almendarez–

Torres exception survived Alleyne.”); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 

F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007) (“Almendarez-Torres remains binding 

precedent until and unless it is officially overruled by the Supreme Court.”). 

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969). The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is 

DENIED as unnecessary. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50369 Document: 00516060883 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
#### § 23.1 To what entities does this regulation apply?

This regulation applies to the assignment of National Health Service Corps personnel under section 333 *et seq.* of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254f) to provide health services in or to health manpower shortage areas as designated under section 332 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254e).
698 A.2d 569

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNCIL, Petitioner, v. Ronald Joseph CAMPANA, Respondent.

No. 349 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 2, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, there having been filed with this Court by Ronald Joseph Campana his verified Statement of Resignation dated May 28, 1997, stating that he *482desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Ronald Joseph Campana be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
#### George R. EVANS v. Arthur G. EVANS, Peggy E. Harbin, and Jack G. Evans.

No. 51053.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 11, 1979.

Teller & Teller, Landman Teller, Jr., Vicksburg, for appellant.

Ward, Martin, Terry & Way, W. C. Way, Vicksburg, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Warren County; J. D. Thames, Chancellor.

REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and SUGG, WALKER, LEE and COFER, JJ., concurring.
HomeLebanon

# Lebanon

239 items

        -    		Rafic  Eid	  April 18, 1983 
        -    		Cesar  Bathiard	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Hussein Haidar-Ahmad	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Terry-Lee Gilden	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Robert McMaugh	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Mohamed Hassan	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Farouk Fanous	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Rafic Eid	  April 18, 1983 
        -    DS Memorial  		Cesar Bathiard	  April 18, 1983 

previous page1…222324

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §193a. Preference right of United States to purchase coal for Army and Navy; price for coal; civil actions; jurisdiction

The United States shall, at all times, have the preference right to purchase so much of the product of any mine or mines opened upon the lands sold under the provisions of this Act, as may be necessary for the use of the Army and Navy, and at such reasonable and remunerative price as may be fixed by the President; but the producers of any coal so purchased who may be dissatisfied with the price thus fixed shall have the right to prosecute suits against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of any additional sum or sums they may claim as justly due upon such purchase.

(May 28, 1908, ch. 211, §2, 35 Stat. 424; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §160(a)(10), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act May 28, 1908, ch. 211, 35 Stat. 424. Sections 1, 3, and 4 of this Act related to consolidation of claims permitted and the limit of acreage, prohibition against unlawful trusts, etc., and contents of patents, respectively, and are not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 453 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court”.

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted “United States Claims Court” for “Court of Claims”.

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in title 10 sections 7421, 7435.
HomePakistan

# Pakistan

295 items

        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-627.1) – Agreement Regarding Grants Under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and the Furnishing of Defense Articles, Related Training, and Other Defense Services from the US to Pakistan	  June 27, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (03-625) – Agreement Concerning Trade and Investment Relations	  June 25, 2003 
        -    		Ghulam  Murtaza	  February 28, 2003 
        -    		Syed Ameer  Badsha	  February 28, 2003 
        -    DS Memorial  		Syed Ameer Badsha	  February 28, 2003 
        -    DS Memorial  		Ghulam Murtaza	  February 22, 2003 
        -    		Obaid  Ullah	  June 14, 2002 
        -    		Muhammad  Azam	  June 14, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Muhammad Azam	  June 14, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Obaid Ullah	  June 14, 2002 

previous page1…27282930next page

Back to Top
#### MARTIN MARIETTA CEMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. COUNTRY CLUB ASSOCIATES, INC., Adobe Building Centers, Inc., General Portland, Inc., L. D. Reynolds, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 78-1458, 78-1519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 26, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1981.

*Peters,*Pickle, Flynn, Niemoeller, Stieglitz & Hart and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant.

*1325Chad P. Pugatch of Houston, Faireloth, Cooper, Easthope & Kelley, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee-Adobe Bldg. Centers, Inc.

HERSEY, Judge.

These consolidated appeals respectively concern an original Order and an Amended Order Concerning Motion For Judgment in Accordance With Motion For Directed Verdict, Or In The Alternative, Motion For New Trial. In essence, appellant appeals the granting of a new trial after a jury verdict in its favor.

The trial court’s order found that the jury verdict for appellant was against the manifest weight of the evidence, assigning some eighteen grounds for that conclusion.

No useful purpose would be served by a lengthy recitation of each of those grounds and an analysis of the arguments of counsel with respect to them. A review of those portions of the extensive record called into controversy reveals that this Court is not in a position to hold that reasonable men could not differ as to the reasonableness of the trial court’s action in granting a new trial. The test approved in *Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty,*359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978) was met here. That test, first enunciated in *Cloud v. Fallis,*110 So.2d 669, 673 (Fla.1959) provides:

> When the judge, who must be presumed to have drawn on his talents, his knowledge and his experience to keep the search for the truth in a proper channel, concludes that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence, it is his duty to grant a new trial, and he should always do that if the jury has been deceived as to the force and credibility of the evidence or has been influenced by considerations outside the record....

The trial judge is in the best position to determine whether or not the jury has been misled. A cold record renders that task awesome for an appellate court. Only where a clear abuse of discretion can be made to appear should the task even be attempted. We find no such showing here and therefore we affirm,

AFFIRMED.

MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
#### Christine GOWDY v. AMERICAN MORTGAGE & INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 51846.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 30, 1980.

Walker, Brookins & Walker, John L. Walker, Jackson, for appellant.

Gary D. Thrash, W. D. Kendall, Jackson, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Dan M. Lee, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
HomeNorway

# Norway

141 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Norwegian Foreign Minister Huitfeldt	  October 11, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Norwegian Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 11, 2022Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Communiqué of the U.S.-Europe Group on Afghanistan	  September 22, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Nature Crime	  September 22, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Norway	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Norway	  July 19, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (22-617) – Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement	  June 17, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-EU Joint Press Release on the Global Methane Pledge Energy Pathway	  June 17, 2022 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Twenty-third Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee Record of Meeting	  June 9, 2022 

previous page1…56789…15next page

Back to Top
# Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

54 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Vincent and the Grenadines	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken’s Roundtable with CARICOM Foreign Ministers	  April 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  March 30, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Eastern Caribbean Summary	   
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Vincent and the Grenadines	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  July 11, 2019 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
#### § 591.305 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
HomeLaos

# Laos

77 items

        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the Mekong-U.S. Partnership Track 1.5 Policy Dialogue Opening Plenary	  Atul KeshapMarch 18, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks at the Indo-Pacific Conference on Strengthening Transboundary River Governance	  Atul KeshapFebruary 25, 2021Hosted by East-West Center WashingtonVideo Conference 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY2020: Global Equality Fund Programs in East Asia	  December 30, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 26, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Laos	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Laos	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Laos	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Laos	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 7, 2019 
        -    Report  		Laos	  July 11, 2019 

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top