alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1380

To provide a moratorium on certain class action lawsuits relating to the

Truth in Lending Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. LEACH, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. BEREUTER,

Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. WELLER, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr.

CHRYSLER, Mr. CREMEANS, and Mr. HEINEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial

Services

A BILL

To provide a moratorium on certain class action lawsuits

relating to the Truth in Lending Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Lending Class

5 Action Relief Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM.

7 Section 130 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C.

8 1640) is amended by adding at the end the following new

9 subsection:
2

•HR 1380 IH

1 ‘‘(i) CLASS ACTION MORATORIUM.—

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—During the period begin3 ning on the date of the enactment of the Truth in

4 Lending Class Action Relief Act of 1995 and ending

5 on October 1, 1995, no court may enter any order

6 certifying any class in any action under this title—

7 ‘‘(A) which is brought in connection with

8 any credit transaction not under an open end

9 credit plan which is secured by a first lien on

10 real property or a dwelling and constitutes a re11 financing or consolidation of an existing exten12 sion of credit; and

13 ‘‘(B) which is based on the alleged failure

14 of a creditor—

15 ‘‘(i) to include a charge actually in16 curred (in connection with the transaction)

17 in the finance charge disclosed pursuant to

18 section 128;

19 ‘‘(ii) to properly make any other dis20 closure required under section 128 as a re21 sult of the failure described in clause (i);

22 or

23 ‘‘(iii) to provide proper notice of re24 scission rights under section 125(a) due to

25 the selection by the creditor of the incor-
3

•HR 1380 IH

1 rect form from among the model forms

2 prescribed by the Board or from among

3 forms based on such model forms.

4 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS FOR CERTAIN ALLEGED VIO5 LATIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply with re6 spect to any action—

7 ‘‘(A) described in clause (i) or (ii) of para8 graph (1)(B), if the amount disclosed as the fi9 nance charge results in an annual percentage

10 rate that exceeds the tolerance provided in sec11 tion 107(c); or

12 ‘‘(B) described in paragraph (1)(B)(iii),

13 if—

14 ‘‘(i) no notice relating to rescission

15 rights under section 125(a) was provided

16 in any form; or

17 ‘‘(ii) proper notice was not provided

18 for any reason other than the reason de19 scribed in such paragraph.

Æ
§ 408.46 Effect of suspension of social security benefits. ( a ) *Benefit payments to be resumed during the taxable year.* ( 1 ) If social security benefit payments are scheduled to be resumed during the enrollee's current taxable year, the enrollee is not billed.
( 2 ) The enrollee may, if he or she wishes, pay the premiums during suspension of benefits.
( b ) *Benefit payments not to be resumed during the enrollee's current taxable year.* ( 1 ) If social security benefits are suspended for a period that will not permit collection of all premiums due from monthly benefits payable in the enrollee's current taxable year, CMS or its agents bill the enrollee and require direct remittance in accordance with subpart D of this part.
( 2 ) The first billing is for whatever premiums are necessary to place the enrollee in a quarterly cycle.
( 3 ) Thereafter, the billing is on a quarterly basis. (Quarters for different enrollees are staggered throughout the year.)
( 4 ) The enrollee has the option of paying premiums for more than one quarter at the same time.
|   | EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION1350 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | BY      /s/ Frank West                         |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|               | Name:  Frank      West               |
|               | Title:  Chief      Executive Officer |
|          |  Date:  May      11, 2009       |

----
#### In re ESTATE of Kenneth McCLAVE, Deceased.

No. 73-1501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
40901.

#### SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARTER.

Decided September 29, 1964.

*Smith, Ringel, Martin, Ansley & Carr, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., John G. Kopp,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. E. Lawson,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. A provision in a policy of fire insurance that no action thereon should be maintainable unless commenced within twelve months next after the occurrence of the loss is valid and constitutes a condition precedent to the maintenance of the action, or a limitation of time within which it may be brought.

2. An action brought after the expiration of twelve months next following the occurrence of the loss is barred by the provision of the policy, and this is true although the petition shows that it is a renewal of a previous action brought within the twelve month period and that it was brought within six months after the first suit had been voluntarily dismissed. *Gross v. Globe &c. Ins. Co.,*140 Ga. 531 (79 SE 138); *Woodall v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,*33 Ga. App. 694 (128 SE 69).

3. Where it appears from the allegations of the petition that the loss occurred more than twelve months before the suit was filed and from the contract itself that it contained a twelvemonth limitation, the petition is subject to a general demurrer. *Peeples v. Western Fire Ins. Co.,*96 Ga. App. 39, 41(1) (99 SE2d 349).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Datakey, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Timothy L. Russell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 29, 2004

                           Signature:    /s/Timothy L. Russell
                                         Timothy L. Russell
                                         Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

#### § 405.1859 Witnesses.

Witnesses at the hearing shall testify under oath or affirmation, unless excused by the Board for cause. The Board may examine the witnesses and shall allow the parties or their representatives to do so. Parties to the proceeding may also cross-examine witnesses.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Gary L. Cook, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Gary L. Cook
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Gary L. Cook
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 14, 2005
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 17, 2023

The below is attributable to Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk in Washington, D.C. during the High Commissioner’s first official visit to the United States.  The Deputy Secretary and the High Commissioner discussed their shared commitment to advancing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.  Acknowledging the upcoming 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Deputy Secretary Sherman reiterated strong U.S. support for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the UN Human Rights Council.  The Deputy Secretary thanked the High Commissioner for his robust engagement on Ukraine and reiterated the importance of the work of the Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine and the Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine.  The two discussed OHCHR’s work around the world, including in Haiti, Ethiopia, and Venezuela.  The Deputy Secretary and High Commissioner highlighted their engagement on equity, inclusion, and accessibility globally, including on LGBTQI+ issues.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDeputy Secretary of StateDiversity and InclusionEthiopiaHaitiHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonUkraineUN and Related OrganizationsVenezuela

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2004 (the Report), I,
James A. McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James A. McNulty

---

James A. McNulty

Chief Financial Officer

January 14, 2004



A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 407.48 Termination of coverage under a State buy-in agreement. An individual's coverage under a buy-in agreement terminates with the earliest of the following events: ( a ) *Death.* Coverage ends on the last day of the month in which the individual dies.
( b ) *Loss of entitlement to hospital insurance benefits before age 65.* If an individual loses entitlement to hospital insurance benefits before attaining age 65, coverage ends on the last day of the last month for which he or she is entitled to hospital insurance.
( c ) *Loss of eligibility for the buy-in group.* If an individual loses eligibility for inclusion in the buy-in group, buy-in coverage ends as follows: ( 1 ) On the last day of the last month for which he or she is eligible for inclusion in the buy-in group, if CMS determines ineligibility or receives a State ineligibility notice by a processing cut-off date as described in paragraph (e) of this section, by the second month after the month in which the individual becomes ineligible for inclusion in the buy-in group.
( 2 ) On the last day of the second month before the month in which CMS receives a State ineligibility notice later than the time specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. If CMS receives a notice after the processing cut-off date conveyed under paragraph (e) of this section, CMS considers it to have been received the following month.
( d ) *Termination or modification of buy-in agreement.* If the State's buy-in agreement is terminated, or modified to substitute a narrower buy-in group, coverage ends on the last day of the last month for which the agreement was in effect, or covered the broader buy-in group.
( e ) *Processing cut-off dates for each calendar month.* On a quarterly basis, CMS is to prospectively convey to States a schedule of processing cut-off dates for each calendar month.
[53 FR 47204, Nov. 22, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 38082, Aug. 12, 1991; 87 FR 66508, Nov. 3, 2022]
§ 551.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 551.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 551.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 551.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
# France

357 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Occasion of the 13th Anniversary of the Syrian Uprising	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The Sixth U.S.-France Cyber Dialogue	  March 14, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Canada	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Endorsing Principles for 6G: Secure, Open, and Resilient by Design	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		On Consultations with France on the Indo-Pacific	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Séjourné	  February 17, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara Travels to France, Germany, Italy, The Holy See, and Austria	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Paris, France: American School of Paris: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 13, 2024 

previous page1234…36next page

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01003202.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/32

---

Action brought on 12 July 2005 by Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-282/05)

(2005/C 229/69)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 12 July 2005 by Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider, residing in Brussels, represented by Georges Vandersanden and Chiara Ronzi, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the Career Development Report for the reference period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the Career Development Report for the reference period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003;

| 2. | to the extent necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint brought on 2 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

2.

to the extent necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint brought on 2 December 2004;

| 3. | order the defendant to pay fair compensation for material and non-material suffered, estimated, subject to certification, at EUR 2 500; |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the defendant to pay fair compensation for material and non-material suffered, estimated, subject to certification, at EUR 2 500;

| 4. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas and principal arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those in Case T-110/04 Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission
   (1).

Sequeira Wandschneider

Commission

1

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004, p. 86.

1

---
#### § 598.407 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 598.202 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 598.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.

[86 FR 26669, May 17, 2021]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Irish Tánaiste/Minister for Foreign Affairs Martin

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Irish Tánaiste/Minister for Foreign Affairs Martin							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 8, 2023

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Washington, D.C. with Ireland’s Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheál Martin.  The Deputy Secretary thanked the Tánaiste for Ireland’s support to Ukraine, including hosting over 70,000 Ukrainians displaced by Putin’s unjustified war.  The two agreed on the importance of continued U.S.-EU cooperation on matters of global importance, like Iran, efforts to de-escalate tensions between Israelis and Palestinians and prevent further loss of life, and challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China.

The Deputy Secretary and the Tánaiste reaffirmed their commitment to the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement ahead of its 25th anniversary in April.  Both agreed on the importance of the EU and UK resolving outstanding issues over the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol as soon as possible.

The Deputy Secretary and the Tánaiste also celebrated the five-year extension of the Ireland Work and Travel program between the United States and Ireland, noting that these exchange opportunities have enriched and strengthened the ties and shared values that bind our countries.

Tags

ChinaDeputy Secretary of StateIrelandOffice of the SpokespersonRegional IssuesUkraine

Back to Top
§ 21.21 Meaning of terms. The terms *approved school, approved college, approved postgraduate school,* or *approved training course* means, except as otherwise provided by law: ( a ) A school, college, postgraduate school, or training course which has been accredited or approved by a professional body or bodies recognized by the Surgeon General for such purpose, or which, in the absence of such a body, meets generally accepted professional standards as determined by the Surgeon General, or
( b ) In the case of a candidate who is applying for appointment as a medical officer, any non-approved medical school provided that the candidate has passed examinations given by a professional body or bodies recognized by the Surgeon General for such purpose.
[24 FR 1790, Mar. 12, 1959]
#### G. Edwin BRUCE, III and Thayer Corporation, Appellants, v. James Victor LOPEZ, Joseph A. Lopez, III, John A. Tripp, Richard J. Skrip, and American Development Corporation, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 80-1579.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1981.

Daniels & Hicks and Mark Hicks, Lees-field & Blackburn, Miami, for appellants.

Lapidus & Stettin and Richard L. Lapi-dus, Miami, for appellees.

Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. Porte,*98 So.2d 781 (Fla.1957); *Wilder v. Burton,*317 So.2d 776 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).