alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DAT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JULIA GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10127

D.C. No. 1:06-CR-00417-LJO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Julia Garcia appeals from her jury-trial conviction and 37-month sentence

imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1).

FILED

DEC 16 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DAT/Research 2 08-10127

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20941]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-615-000;ER07-1257-000; ER08-1113-000; ER08-1178-000; 
ER09-1048-000; ER09-1281-000; ER01-313-009]

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

August 25, 2009.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on the following dates members of its staff will 
participate in teleconferences and meetings to be conducted by the 
California Independent System Operator (CAISO). The agenda and other 
documents for the teleconferences and meetings are available on the 
CAISO Web site, http://www.caiso.com.

August 26, 2009 2001-2003 Grid Management Charge Refund
August 27, 2009 Convergence Bidding, Large Generator Interconnection 
Procedures, Tariff Revisions
August 28, 2009 Real Time Imbalance Energy Offset
August 31, 2009 Scarcity Pricing Meeting
September 1, 2009 Systems Interface User Group
September 2, 2009 Congestion Revenue Rights Settlements and Market 
Clearing User Group
September 3, 2009 Market Issues
September 8, 2009 Systems Interface User Group, Congestion Revenue 
Rights Enhancement
September 9, 2009 Congestion Revenue Rights Settlements and Market 
Clearing User Group

    Sponsored by the CAISO, the teleconferences and meetings are open 
to all market participants, and Commission staff's attendance is part 
of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. The teleconferences and 
meetings may discuss matters at issue in the above captioned dockets.
    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at 
[email protected]; (916) 294-0322 or Maury Kruth at 
[email protected], (916) 294-0275.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20941 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and European External Action Service (EEAS) Secretary General Stefano Sannino

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with NATO Deputy Secretary General Geoană and European External Action Service (EEAS) Secretary General Stefano Sannino							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 20, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met jointly today in Brussels with NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană and EEAS Secretary General Stefano Sannino.  Deputy Secretary Sherman praised the strong NATO-EU coordination in responding to Russia’s unprovoked and brutal war against Ukraine.  Deputy Secretary Sherman, Deputy Secretary General Geoana, and Secretary General Sannino agreed that NATO-EU coordination is essential for Transatlantic security and prosperity and they discussed further steps to enhance the NATO-EU strategic partnership.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
----

Action brought on 13 September 2005 — Adler Modemärkte/OHIM

(Case T-340/05)

(2005/C 296/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Adler Modemärkte GmbH (Haibach, Germany) [represented by: R. Kaase, lawyer]

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BVM S.p.A. (Bologna, Italy)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Eagle’ for goods in classes 3, 18 and 25 — application No 1 595 909

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: BVM S.p.A.

Mark or sign cited: The national and international figurative mark and word mark ‘Blue Eagle’ for goods in classes 3, 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the contested goods

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks. The overall impression of the two trade marks is substantially different and the component ‘eagle’ is not the dominating element of the opposition trade mark.

----
§ 137.332 On what basis may the Secretary reject a final construction project proposal? ( a ) The only basis for rejection of project activities in a final construction project proposal are: ( 1 ) The amount of funds proposed in the final construction project proposal exceeds the applicable funding level for the construction project as determined under sections 508(c) [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-7(c)] and 106 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450j-1].
( 2 ) The final construction project proposal does not meet the minimum content requirements for construction project agreements set forth in section 501(a)(2) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa(a)(2)]; and
( 3 ) The final construction project proposal on its face clearly demonstrates that the construction project cannot be completed as proposed.
( b ) For construction programs proposed to be included in a construction project agreement, the Secretary may also reject that portion of the proposal that proposes to assume an inherently Federal function that cannot legally be delegated to the Self-Governance Tribe.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40581 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DONALD WAYNE NANTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 1:91-CR-56)

- - - - - - - - - - July 2, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Donald Wayne Nantz, federal prisoner #03324-078, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that the district court abused its discretion by “resentencing” him to the high end of the amende d guideline range and that he had a right to be present and to the preparation of an updated presentence report at his “resentencing.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Nantz’s argument that the district court erred2

by determ ining that 50 pounds of ephedrine would produce thirty pounds of pure methamphetamine is not cognizable in a § 3582 proceeding. S ee Un ited States v. Shaw , 30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Nantz’s motion to remand jurisdiction to the district court is
DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
# C_2006010EN.01001801.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/18

---

Appeal brought on 29 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the judgment delivered on 13 September 2005 by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) in Case T-72/04 between S. Hosman-Chevalier and the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-424/05 P)

(2006/C 10/35)

Language of the case: French

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 13 September 2005 by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) in Case T-72/04 between S. Hosman-Chevalier and the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 29 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by H. Kraemer and M. Velardo, acting as Agents.

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the Court of First Instance;

| — | order the applicant at first instance to pay the costs of the proceedings, including her own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant at first instance to pay the costs of the proceedings, including her own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits a single plea against the judgment under appeal alleging breach of Community law in paragraphs 31 to 36 and 42 of that judgment. More precisely, it considers that the Court of First Instance misinterpreted the condition relating to ‘work done for another State’ laid down at the end of the second indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.

---
#### § 802.231 Person.

The term *person* means any individual or entity.
Exhibit 31.2





I, Richard A. Petrocelli, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2019 of Flat Rock Capital Corp.;



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.



|Date:	April 29, 2020 | /s/ Richard A. Petrocelli                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Richard A. PetrocelliChief Financial
Officer and
                                                                   Chief Operating
Officer
                                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2005217EN.01003802.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/38

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 30 June 2005

in Case T-439/03 Ulrike Eppe v the European Parliament (1)

1

(Open competition - Non-admission to tests - Necessary professional experience)

(2005/C 217/85)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-439/03: Ulrike Eppe, residing in Hanover (Germany), represented by W. Klöber, lawyer, against the European Parliament (Agents: J. de Wachter and N. Lorenz with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for, firstly, the annulment of the decisions of the selection board in competition EUR/A/167/02 of 24 February and 28 April 2003 and, secondly, the decision of the Appointing Authority of 17 September 2003 — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs, including those of the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs, including those of the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C of 17.4.2004

1

---
HomeCosta Rica

# Costa Rica

137 items

        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Costa Rica Summary	   
        -    TIAS  		Costa Rica (21-115) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions	  January 15, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Costa Rica	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Costa Rica	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Costa Rica	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Other Release  		FY 2020 TIP Office Initial Notification of Funding Opportunity – Program to End Modern Slavery (PEMS)	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		Evaluation of the CARSI Small Grants Program [PDF]	  March 18, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Costa Rica	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Costa Rica	  July 11, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Costa Rica (19-708) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement FATCA, with Supplemental Agreement	   

previous page1…91011121314next page

Back to Top
#### Wesley Dean WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. U-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Alfredo GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann MULREANY, Appellee.

No. 79-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 9, 1979.

A. Koss and Theodore M. Goldberg, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Lane, Mitchell & Harris and Howard M. Bernstein, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

Appellant Alfredo Gonzalez was the plaintiff below. Upon the completion of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The court announced, “I am going to direct a verdict.” Immediately thereafter, the plaintiff took a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(1). The trial court then entered its judgment for the defendant.

The Supreme Court of Florida, in *Fears v. Lunsford,*314 So.2d 578 (Fla.1975), has interpreted the identical rule as follows:

> “The rule is specific on this point. It states in unusual language, *‘the action may be dismissed by plaintiff without order of court?*by (1) service before trial or (2) stating on the record a notice of dismissal. No action is required by the court under the rule. Hence, a statement by the court that the notice is approved, or a motion to dismiss, if made, is granted, adds nothing to the finality of the dismissal. The only remaining action required by the court contemplated by the rule would be to advise the jury thereof in a jury case.”

The plaintiff having taken a voluntary dismissal, the trial court had no further authority to enter a judgment in the case.

The judgment appealed is reversed.

Reversed.
§ 37.50 Interpreting and classifying chest radiographs—film radiography systems. ( a ) Chest radiographs must be interpreted and classified in accordance with the Guidelines for the Use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses (incorporated by reference, *see* § 37.10). Chest radiograph interpretations and classifications must be recorded on a paper or electronic Chest Radiograph Classification Form (CDC/NIOSH 2.8).
( b ) Radiographs must be interpreted and classified only by a physician who reads chest radiographs in the normal course of practice and who has demonstrated proficiency in classifying the pneumoconioses in accordance with § 37.52. ( 1 ) Initial clinical interpretations and notification of findings other than pneumoconiosis under paragraph (a) of this section must be provided by a qualified physician who provides these services for the examining facility. This physician must have all required licensure and privileges, and must interpret chest radiographs in the normal course of practice.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) All interpreters, whenever interpreting chest radiographs made under the Act, must have immediately available for reference a complete set of the standard radiographs for use with the Guidelines for the Use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses (incorporated by reference, *see* § 37.10).
( d ) View boxes used for making interpretations must comply with the following: ( 1 ) Fluorescent lamps must be simultaneously replaced with new lamps at 6-month intervals;
( 2 ) All the fluorescent lamps in a panel of boxes must have identical manufacturer's ratings as to intensity and color;
( 3 ) The glass, internal reflective surfaces, and the lamps must be kept clean;
( 4 ) The unit must be so situated as to minimize front surface glare.
[81 FR 73284, Oct. 24, 2016]
§ 1007.20 Circumstances of permissible data mining. ( a ) Notwithstanding § 1007.19(e)(2), a Unit may engage in data mining as defined in this part and receive FFP only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The Unit identifies the methods of coordination between the Unit and the Medicaid agency, the individuals serving as primary points of contact for data mining, as well as the contact information, title, and office of such individuals;
( 2 ) Unit employees engaged in data mining receive specialized training in data mining techniques;
( 3 ) The Unit describes how it will comply with paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section as part of the agreement required by § 1007.9(d); and
( 4 ) OIG, in consultation with CMS, approves in advance the provisions of the agreement as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section. ( i ) OIG will act on a request from a Unit for review and approval of the agreement within 90 days after receipt of a written request, or the request shall be considered approved if OIG fails to respond within 90 days after receipt of the written request.
( ii ) If OIG requests additional information in writing, the 90-day period for OIG action on the request begins on the day OIG receives the information from the Unit.
( iii ) The approval is for 3 years.
( iv ) A Unit may request renewal of its data-mining approval for additional 3-year periods by submitting a written request for renewal to OIG, along with an updated agreement with the Medicaid agency.
HomeForeign Press Centers...Foreign Press Centers  Releases

# Foreign Press Centers Releases

280 items

        -    FPC Briefing  		2024 Wall Street Series: Moody’s Analytics	  February 28, 2024Wednesday, February 28, 1:00 p.m. ETNew York City 
        -    FPC Briefing  		2024 Wall Street Series: NYU School of Professional Studies (NYU SPS) Schack Institute of Real Estate	  February 22, 2024Thursday, February 22, 2:00 p.m. ETNew York City 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Two-year Mark of Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine and United States’ Support for Ukraine	  Yuri KimFebruary 22, 2024Thursday, February 22, 2023, 9:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Election Briefing Series: How Candidates Are Selected	  February 20, 2024Tuesday, February 20, 2023, 9:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Information Session for Media Planning to Cover the 2024 Presidential Nominating Conventions	  February 16, 2024Friday, February 16, 2023, 2:00pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Domestic and International Dimensions of the U.S. Fentanyl Crisis	  February 15, 2024Thursday, February 15, 2023, 9:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		The Indo-Pacific Strategy: 2 Years Later	  Camille P.  DawsonFebruary 14, 2024Wednesday, February 14, 2023, 11:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		2024 Wall Street Series: The Conference Board	  February 8, 2024Thursday, February 8, 2:00 p.m. ETNew York City 
        -    FPC Briefing  		U.S. Migration Policy Overview	  January 11, 2024Thursday, January 11, 2023, 12:00pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		City Spotlight: Tourism and Community Development in Santa Claus, Indiana	  December 20, 2023Wednesday, December 20, 2023, 11:00am ETWashington, D.C. 

previous page123456…28next page

Back to Top
# Cuba

155 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Trafficking in Persons and Cuba’s Labor Export Program	  April 3, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		International Women of Courage Amplify Young Generation’s Voices	  March 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Havana, Cuba: International School of Havana: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Havana, Cuba: International School of Havana: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Promoting Democracy and Human Rights in Cuba	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 20, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 20, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. – Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue	  February 7, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance  		Welcome Corps:  First Year of Refugee Private Sponsorship a Big Success	  January 19, 2024 

123…16next page

Back to Top