alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Richard Bruggeman, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on form 10-QSB of InMedica
Development Corporation.

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report.

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

         a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  Presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have  disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

Date:  November 10, 2003


By: /s/ Richard Bruggeman
-------------------------
Richard Bruggeman, CFO
# C_2005187EN.01000502.xml

| 30.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3578 — BP/Nova Chemicals/JV)

(2005/C 187/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3578. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3578. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomePoland

# Poland

184 items

        -    TIAS  		Poland (99-917) – Treaty on Extradition	  September 17, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (97-422) – Agreement for Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  April 22, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (96-531) – Agreement for the Establishment of the US-Polish Fulbright Commission	  May 31, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (94-806) – Treaty Concerning Business and Economic Relations	  August 6, 1994 

previous page1…171819

Back to Top
#### § 92.18 Judicial review.

A Final Notice of Assessment issued under the procedures in this subpart may be subject to judicial review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.*
# France

370 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 5, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 5, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with French Foreign Minister Le Drian, German Foreign Minister Maas, and UK Foreign Secretary Raab	  February 5, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement by the Secretary of State of the United States of America and the Foreign Minister of France on Lebanon	  February 4, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Burma	  February 3, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with French Foreign Minister Le Drian	  January 27, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Arrest and Detention of Alexey Navalny	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Situation in Libya	  January 21, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		France (21-101) – Agreement on Employment of Dependents of Official Employees	  January 1, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		France (20-1116) – Amendment One to the Agreement for Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation Projects	  November 16, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: France and Monaco	  September 8, 2020 

previous page1…2930313233…37next page

Back to Top
§ 576.512 Transactions with certain blocked persons authorized. ( a ) All transactions with state bodies, corporations, or agencies of the former Iraqi regime that are otherwise prohibited by § 576.201(a) are authorized.
( b ) The authorization in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any transactions with state bodies, corporations, or agencies of the former Iraqi regime listed on the Office of Foreign Assets Control's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List.
[75 FR 55466, Sept. 13, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 38542, June 30, 2011]
HomeUganda

# Uganda

102 items

        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 8, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  December 8, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Steps to Impose Visa Restrictions for Undermining Democracy And for Repression in Uganda	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 4, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Uganda	  November 29, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		This Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Every Week, the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs Works to Build Sustainable Businesses Worldwide	  November 17, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Kampala, Uganda: The International School of Uganda: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Government Issues a Business Advisory for Uganda	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		Uganda Business Advisory	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Ugandan National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 9, 2023 
        -    Question 2.1: Foreign Assistance  		The Impact of Aid on Economic Growth: Analysis of Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Agriculture and Food Security	   

previous page1234…11next page

Back to Top
§ 31.10 Dependent members of families; use of Service facilities. ( a ) A dependent member of the family of any person specified in § 31.9 shall, upon presentation of satisfactory evidence of such status, be entitled to medical advice and out-patient treatment at first-, second-, and third-class medical relief stations and hospitalization at first-class stations if suitable accommodations are available therein and if the condition of the dependent is such as to require hospitalization, both as determined by the medical officer in charge.
( b ) Hospitalization at first-class stations shall be at a per diem cost to the officer, enlisted person, member of a crew or other person concerned. Such cost shall be at such uniform rate as may be prescribed from time to time by the President for the hospitalization of dependents of naval and Marine Corps personnel at any naval hospital.
( c ) Hospitalization at first-class stations and out-patient treatment at first-, second-, and third-class stations may include such services and supplies as, in the judgment of the medical officer in charge, are necessary for reasonable and adequate treatment.
( d ) Dental treatment shall be furnished to the extent of available facilities only at medical relief stations where full-time officers are on duty.
(Sec. 326, 58 Stat. 697, as amended; 42 U.S.C. 253)
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 13 September 2005

in Case C-176/03: Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (1)

(Action for annulment - Articles 29 EU, 31(e) EU, 34 EU and 47 EU - Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA - Protection of the environment - Criminal penalties - Community competence - Legal basis - Article 175 EC)

(2005/C 315/03)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-176/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Petite, J. F. Pasquier and W. Bogensberger) supported by: European Parliament, (Agents: G. Garzón Clariana, H. Duintjer Tebbens and A. Baas, and M. Gómez-Leal) v Council of the European Union (Agent: J.-C. Piris, J. Schutte and K. Michoel) supported by: Kingdom of Denmark (Agent: J. Molde), Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and A. Dittrich), Hellenic Republic (Agents: E.-M. Mamouna and M. Tassopoulou), Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad), French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues, F. Alabrune and E. Puisais), Ireland (Agent: D. O'Hagan, and P. Gallagher, E. Fitzsimons SC and E. Regan BL), Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agents: H.G. Sevenster and C. Wissels), Portuguese Republic (Agent: L. Fernandes and A. Fraga Pires), Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski), Kingdom of Sweden (Agents: A. Kruse, K. Wistrand and A. Falk), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: C. Jackson and R. Plender QC) — Application for annulment pursuant to Article 35 EU brought on 15 April 2003, — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, G. Arestis, M. Ilešič and J. Malenovský, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 September 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 135 of 07.06.2003.

----
# C_2005230EN.01000101.xml

| 20.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 September 2005

(2005/C 230/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2139 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4579 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3300 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5511 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7940 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5729 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,175 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8795 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4794 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,48 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,430 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6340 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5887 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4316 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4219 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7356 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0420 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8173 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8214 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4315 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 321,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,576 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,337 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,895 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2139

JPY

Japanese yen

135,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4579

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67280

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3300

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5511

ISK

Iceland króna

75,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7940

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5729

CZK

Czech koruna

29,175

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8795

RON

Romanian leu

3,4794

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,48

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,430

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6340

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5887

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4316

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4219

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7356

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0420

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,62

ZAR

South African rand

7,8173

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8214

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4315

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 321,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,576

PHP

Philippine peso

68,337

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5050

THB

Thai baht

49,895

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeTrinidad and Tobago

# Trinidad and Tobago

81 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: The International School of Port-of-Spain: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: The International School of Port-of-Spain: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Caribbean Engagement to Counter Firearms Trafficking	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago Rowley	  January 29, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken and Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Keith Rowley Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 29, 2024Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Trinidad and Tobago	  November 29, 2023 
        -    DSS Releases  		Trinidad National Sentenced To Seven Years In Federal Prison For Stealing Identity And Applying For Passport In Name Of Disabled Veteran	  October 4, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Trinidad and Tobago National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 31, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Trinidad and Tobago	  August 18, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 

123…9next page

Back to Top
# Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

54 items

        -    Report  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		St. Vincent and the Grenadines	  June 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (17-407) – Air Transport Agreement	  April 7, 2017 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Air Transport Agreement of April 7, 2017	  April 7, 2017 
        -    Report  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (16-513) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  May 13, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		INCLE-CBSI Activities – Summative Evaluation (Summary)	  September 18, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (12-1211) – Defense Agreement Regarding the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative	  December 11, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		St. Vincent and the Grenadines (10-511.1) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Their Delivery Systems, and Related Materials by Sea	  May 11, 2010 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2989

To redesignate the Jemez Canyon Dam as the ‘‘Tamaya Dam’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1996

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. RICHARDSON, and Mr. SKEEN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To redesignate the Jemez Canyon Dam as the ‘‘Tamaya

Dam’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The dam located in the Pueblo of Santa Ana, New

5 Mexico, and known as the Jemez Canyon Dam, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Tamaya Dam’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

9 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the
2

•HR 2989 IH

1 dam referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to refer to

2 the ‘‘Tamaya Dam’’.

Æ
#### § 536.407 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 536.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 536.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.

[86 FR 26665, May 17, 2021]
April 25, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARRIS COUNTY– HOUSTON SPORTS AUTHORITY, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00380-CV V.

FERNANDO CHILEL, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the interlocutory order in favor of appellee, 

FERNANDO CHILEL, signed, April 12, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the interlocutory order. 

We order the interlocutory order of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, HARRIS COUNTY – HOUSTON SPORTS 

AUTHORITY, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2005176EN.01002501.xml

| 16.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/25

---

‘Consumer policy’

(2005/C 176/08)

The call for applications for financial support to European consumer organisations in 2006 has been published on the Commission's Web site at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/consumers/tenders/information/grants/support_en.htm.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor GALLARDO-ARREDONDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50337.

D.C. No. CR-00-00066-MLH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 23, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Victor Gallardo-Arredondo appeals his conviction and 12-month and one-day sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960(b)(4). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gallardo-Arredondo contends that his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 960 is unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because Gallardo-Arredondo did not object at sentencing, we review for plain error. *See United States v. Nordby,*225 F.3d 1053, 1060 (9th Cir. 2000).

The district court’s imposition of a 12-month and one-day sentence is far less that the five-year statutory maximum to which Gallardo-Arredondo was subject, based on the facts admitted to at the time he pleaded guilty. *See*21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(4). Because the district court’s findings did not raise Gallardo-Arredondo’s sentence beyond that which he would have received based on the facts admitted *514to at the change of plea hearing, he cannot show that any error affected the fairness or integrity of the judicial proceedings. *See United States v. Garcia-Guizar,*227 F.3d 1125, 1129 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
HomeKiribati

# Kiribati

32 items

        -    TIAS  		Kiribati (06-223) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences on Global Seismic Data Acquisition	  February 23, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Kiribati (04-304) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  March 4, 2004 

previous page1234

Back to Top
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Ryan Novak, ERG

DATE: September 30, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the Lick Creek/White River, IN

Case Study Model (DCN SE05592)

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the Lick 

Creek/White River, IN Case Study Model, developed as part of the Environmental Assessment 

for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating 

Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN SE04527). The 

supporting documentation for this case study includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation for the Lick Creek/White River, IN Case Study Model

Attachment 

ID Document Name Brief Description

A1

Attachment 1: Pollutant 

Loadings and Design 

Workbook - SE05592A1

Documentation of the modeling scope, design, steam electric power 

plant loadings, STORET monitoring data, and DMR/TRI point source 

loadings evaluated for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case study 

model. Refer to the ‘ReadMe’ tab of the workbook for additional 

information about the contents of each tab.

A2

Attachment 2: WASP 

Model Input and Output 

Files - SE05592A2

These files represent the WASP model input and output files for the 

Lick Creek/White River, IN case study model. The WASP input file 

(.wif) for each pollutant and scenario represents the settings and 

inputs used to execute case study modeling. The output data represent 

the daily water column and sediment concentrations in each segment 

of the WASP model, for each pollutant, for baseline and each 

regulatory option.

A3

Attachment 3: Water 

Quality Benchmark 

Exceedance Analysis -

SE05592A3

The water quality analysis for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case 

study model. These results were generated by running a script on the 

raw WASP model output (see Attachment 2). The output from this 

script indicates the percent of daily average concentrations that each 

segment exceeded the water quality benchmarks and CSCL sediment 

benchmarks evaluated in the EA.

A4

Attachment 4: Wildlife 

and Human Health 

Impacts Analysis -

SE05592A4

The wildlife and human health analysis for the Lick Creek/White 

River, IN case study model. This workbook includes the annual 

average water column concentration output, generated by the WASP 

model, that were evaluated against the threshold concentrations 

determined to trigger wildlife or human health benchmark

exceedances.