alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MERISEL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             109,701
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      184,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16,501
<INVENTORY>                                        467,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   759,837
<PP&E>                                             106,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                      64,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     833,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              560,779
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               802
<OTHER-SE>                                         141,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       833,526
<SALES>                                          1,101,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,101,670
<CGS>                                            1,039,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       49,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                           149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .05
        



</TABLE>
HomeIceland

# Iceland

98 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Iceland	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Iceland	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Iceland’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 16, 2022 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Twenty-third Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee Record of Meeting	  June 9, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Limited Resumption of Arctic Council Cooperation	  June 8, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Iceland	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the United States – Iceland Strategic Dialogue	  April 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Iceland	  April 12, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (22-331) – Agreement Amending and Extending Memorandum of Understanding for Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences, as Amended and Extended	  March 31, 2022 

previous page12345…10next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H.R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the State of 
                 California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hoopa Valley Reservation South 
Boundary Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. LAND TRANSFER TO RESERVATION.

    (a) In General.--All right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the lands described in subsection (b) shall hereafter 
be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Hoopa 
Valley Tribe and shall be part of the Hoopa Valley Reservation.
    (b) Lands Described.--The lands referred to in subsection (a) are 
those portions of Townships 7 North and 8 North, Ranges 5 East and 6 
East, Humboldt Meridian, California, within a boundary beginning at a 
point on the current south boundary of the Hoopa Valley Indian 
Reservation, marked and identified as ``Post H.V.R. No. 8'' on the Plat 
of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation prepared from a field survey 
conducted by C.T. Bissel, Augustus T. Smith and C.A. Robinson, Deputy 
Surveyors, approved by the Surveyor General, H. Pratt, March 18, 1892, 
and extending from said point on a bearing of north 72 degrees 30 
minutes east, until intersecting with a line beginning at a point 
marked as ``Post H.V.R. No. 3'' on said survey and extending on a 
bearing of south 15 degrees 59 minutes east, comprising 2,641 acres 
more or less.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment.--The boundary of the Six Rivers National 
Forest shall be adjusted to exclude the lands to be held in trust for 
the benefit of the Hoopa Valley Tribe pursuant to this section.

SEC. 3. SURVEY.

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land 
Management, shall survey and monument that portion of the boundary of 
the Hoopa Valley Reservation established by the addition of lands made 
by section 2.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1898.

Before Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

#### Moritz Kugelman, Respondent, v. Rosa Hirschman et al. impleaded, etc., Appellants

— Appealfrom an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming an order of Special Term, adjudging the de-' murrers interposed herein by the defendants to be frivolous and directing judgment for plaintiff thereon.

Hays *&*Greenbaum, for Appellants;

Gruber & Bonynge, for Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
#### JOSEPH SHEEHY, Defendant in Error, v. MORTON WOLLMAN, Plaintiff in Error.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

January 16, 1911.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR: Weight of'Evidence. Where a verdict is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed on appeal because it is against the weight of the evidence.

2. PRINCIPAL AND AGENT: Undisclosed Principal: Liability of Agent. An agent, claiming to own property of an undisclosed principal, is responsible for his acts done in connection with such property.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Herman Brumbaoh,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Henry G. Solomon*for plaintiff in error.

*Reinhardt & Schibsley*for defendant in error.

ELLISON, J.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace to recover commission for the sale of real estate. On appeal to the circuit court judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

The whole case turns on matter of evidence and as the verdict was for plaintiff we must assume the facts to be as the evidence in his behalf tends to prove them and we must give him the benefit of every proper inference which can be reasonably drawn from the evidence. Applying that rule, we find that the judgment must be affirmed.

*507Defendant listed the property with plaintiff for sale at eighty dollars per foot. Afterwards in conversations or communications between them the price was raised to one hundred dollars per foot. One Duncan was assisting plaintiff to make a sale, they having an arrangement between them for a division of commission. Duncan began negotiations for a sale with an acquaintance whom he knew was wanting a piece of property. Plaintiff informed defendant who the prospective purchaser was. During all this time defendant said the property was his and plaintiff supposed him to be the owner, but it turned out that it was owned by his brother. The deal was finally closed between defendant and the purchaser and the deed made by the brother.

The fact that defendant was not the owner of the property and was acting for his brother in its sale, will not affect the case, for the agent of an undisclosed principal is liable as though he were the principal.

Defendant seeks to set aside the judgment on the ground of what he terms the unsatisfactory and indefinite character of the testimony in behalf of plaintiff; but we are clearly of the opinion it was sufficient for the jury and can do no less than to order its affirmance.

All concur.
§ 38.1 Purpose; coordination. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part establishes standards and procedures for the implementation of section 413 of Pub. L. 93-288, the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5183) which authorizes the provision, either directly or through financial assistance to State or local agencies or private mental health organizations, of: ( 1 ) Professional counseling services to victims of a major disaster in order to relieve mental health problems caused or aggravated by such a major disaster or its aftermath; and
( 2 ) Training of disaster workers to provide or assist in providing those professional counseling services.
( b ) *Coordination.* The Secretary, acting through the National Institute of Mental Health, will, as provided in 24 CFR 2205.51, carry out section 413 of the Act and this part in coordination with and under the general policy guidance of, the Administrator of the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration. Contracts and grants awarded under this part are subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and the implementing regulations promulgated by the Administrator (24 CFR part 2205).
§ 802.234 Purchase. ( a ) The term *purchase* means an arrangement conveying an ownership interest in real estate to a person in exchange for consideration.
( b ) Example: Person A, a foreign person, acquires covered real estate from Person B, a U.S. national, in exchange for land and services. Person A has purchased the covered real estate because the arrangement was predicated on consideration in the form of land and services.
Home1990 Treaties and Agreements...Costa Rica (90-518.1) – Finance Agreement

# 									Costa Rica (90-518.1) – Finance Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

May 18, 1990

Finance

Agreement signed at Washington and San Jose May 18, 1990; entered into force May 18, 1990.

With Letter of Understanding.
Download Agreement						 [572 KB]

Tags

Costa RicaFinanceTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
#### § 561.334 Copper sector of Iran.

The term *copper sector of Iran* means the mining, refining, processing, or manufacturing of copper or copper products in Iran.

[84 FR 38547, Aug. 7, 2019]
# C_2005171EN.01001902.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 4 May 2005

in Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community Trade Mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Westlife - Earlier national mark West - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs)

(2005/C 171/34)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by P. Koch Moreno, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: S. Laitinen), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Bluenet Ltd, established in Limerick (Ireland) — application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 November 2003 (Case R 238/2002-2) relating to opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the mark West against the application for the mark Westlife — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; B. Pastor, Assistant Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 4 May 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 November 2003 (Case R 238/2002-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 November 2003 (Case R 238/2002-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2809

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement

that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services

performed by election workers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Mr. UPTON (for himself and Mr. FARR of California) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the requirement that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services performed by election

workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) paragraph (3) of section 3309(b) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exception for certain

5 services) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub6 paragraph (D), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (E), and by inserting after subparagraph (E) the

8 following new subparagraph:
2

•HR 2809 IH

1 ‘‘(F) an election official or election worker

2 if the amount of remuneration reasonably ex3 pected to be received by the individual during

4 the calendar year for services as an election of5 ficial or election worker is less than $200;’’.

6 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

7 apply to services performed after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            4760
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1489
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      16184
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           31152
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             31293
<LOANS>                                          63765
<ALLOWANCE>                                        578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  131044
<DEPOSITS>                                       91046
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1409
<LONG-TERM>                                      22984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4705
<OTHER-SE>                                        8900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  131044
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   5571
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3138
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   637
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9346
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4273
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5073
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  34
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2572
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1596
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.4
<LOANS-NON>                                        360
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    305
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   628
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      115
<RECOVERIES>                                        65
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  578
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               578
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            219
        

</TABLE>
40784.

#### RINKER et al. v. SPARKS *et*al.

Decided June 12, 1964.

*811*Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, Thomas R. Burnside, Jr.,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Randall Evans, Jr.,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Headnote 1 needs no amplification, *812but we suggest a reading of Weihofen, *Word-Watching for Lawyers,*50 ABA Journal 663 (July 1964), and the references on the subject in *MacIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint &c. Co.,*107 Ga. App. 807 (131 SE2d 640). The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.

If one stands in need of relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to his rights, status and other legal relations, declaratory judgment is an appropriate remedy, for he then occupies a position similar to that referred to in Isaiah 59:9: “Therefore is judgment far from us, neither doth justice overtake us: we wait for light, but behold obscurity; for brightness, but we walk in darkness.” The Supreme Court has held that “the declaratory judgment law permits one who is walking in the dark to turn on a light to ascertain where he is and where he is going . . . However, one walking in full daylight, who knows where he is going and is confident of the course he is pursuing, has no need either of artificial light or judicial advice.” *Venable v. Dallas,*212 Ga. 595 (94 SE2d 416).

The question sought to be resolved here is neither one of law nor of the construction of some ambiguous or obscure provision of the contract; it is purely one of fact, *i.e.,*whether the rent was in default at the time demand was made by the lessors for possession of the premises. Obviously a resolution of that question would be determinative of the issues made by the petition here as well as those which would arise in a dispossessory proceeding, where the relief here sought is available. Under the facts alleged the rights of the parties have accrued. The sustaining of the general demurrer was proper.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE  THREE-MONTH  PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,187,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,488,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (81,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        536,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   952,000
<PP&E>                                           7,726,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,884,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,804,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,139,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           727,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,523,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,804,000
<SALES>                                          1,872,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,428,000
<CGS>                                              930,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,060,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,440,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,961,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,961,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,961,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.03)


</TABLE>