alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 584.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 584.201(a) shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally-insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 584.201(a) may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 584.201(a) may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as chattels or real estate, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides immediate financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a), nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Robert H. WIGGINS, Respondent.

No. 60501.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 28, 1981.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Cynthia S. Prettyman, Asst. Branch Staff Counsel, Fort Lauder-dale, for complainant.

Joseph A. Varón, Hollywood, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea to Consent Judgment and Entry of Final Order of Discipline to violations of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4); 1-102(A)(5); 2-103(A); 2-104; and Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(5). We approve the Petition, and Respondent Robert H. Wiggins is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and one day. In addition, proof of rehabilitation shall be required for reinstatement. This suspension shall be effective June 29, 1981, thereby giving Respondent thirty (30) days to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients. Respondent shall not accept any new business.

Costs in the amount of $573.50 are hereby taxed against the Respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
#### James L. BORDELON v. Cheryl Gaspard BORDELON.

No. 67521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re James L. Bordelon, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court. 381 So.2d 871.

Granted.
# Colombia

307 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 5, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 5, 2023 
        -    Direct Line Event  		Colombian Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) For Infrastructure	  June 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Colombia Joint Commitment to Address the Hemispheric Challenge of Irregular Migration	  June 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador at Large Fick’s Travel to Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks by Ambassador Beth Van Schaack at the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, Colombia: "Delivering Justice and Accountability in Colombia"	  Beth Van SchaackMay 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya Travels to Colombia and Guatemala	  May 22, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Colombia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Three Former Colombian Officials Due to Involvement in Gross Violations of Human Rights	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 4, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Before His Meeting with Women Mayors from the Western Hemisphere On the Margins of the Cities Summit of the Americas	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 28, 2023Colorado Convention CenterDenver, Colorado 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Government Announces Sweeping New Actions to Manage Regional Migration	  April 27, 2023 

previous page1…45678…31next page

Back to Top
#### § 558.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.
#### § 137.144 Is technical assistance available to an Indian Tribe to avoid rejection of a final offer?

Yes, upon receiving a final offer, the Secretary must offer any necessary technical assistance, and must share all relevant information with the Indian Tribe in order to avoid rejection of a final offer.
#### Elmore COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Peter de Manió, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2005271EN.01000402.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 5 July 2005

in Case C-376/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch D. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen (1)

1

(Tax legislation - Wealth tax - Entitlement to an allowance - Separate treatment of residents and non-residents - Double taxation convention)

(2005/C 271/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-376/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands), made by decision of 24 July 2003, received at the Court on 8 September 2003, in the proceedings between D. and Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen — the Court (Grand Chamber) composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, J. Klučka and U. Lõhmus, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 5 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Articles 56 EC and 58 EC do not preclude legislation under which a Member State denies non-resident taxpayers who hold the major part of their wealth in the State where they are resident entitlement to the allowances which it grants to resident taxpayers. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC do not preclude legislation under which a Member State denies non-resident taxpayers who hold the major part of their wealth in the State where they are resident entitlement to the allowances which it grants to resident taxpayers.

| 2. | Articles 56 EC and 58 EC do not preclude a rule laid down by a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation such as the rule at issue in the main proceedings from not being extended, in a situation and in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, to residents of a Member State which is not party to that convention. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC do not preclude a rule laid down by a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation such as the rule at issue in the main proceedings from not being extended, in a situation and in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, to residents of a Member State which is not party to that convention.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
§ 1008.33 Expert opinions from outside sources. ( a ) The OIG may request expert advice from qualified sources on non-legal issues if necessary to respond to the advisory opinion request. For example, the OIG may require the use of appropriate medical reviewers, such as quality improvement organizations, to obtain medical opinions on specific issues.
( b ) The time period for issuing an advisory opinion will be tolled from the time that the OIG notifies the requestor of the need for an outside expert opinion until the time the OIG receives the necessary expert opinion.
( c ) Once payment is made for the cost of the expert opinion, as set forth in § 1008.31(e) of this part, either directly to the expert or otherwise, the OIG will arrange for a prompt expert review of the issue or issues in question. Regardless of the manner of payment, the expert's work and opinion will be subject to the sole direction of the OIG.
[62 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 38325, July 16, 1998]
HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Visa Application Service Centers

# 									Visa Application Service Centers							

Circular Notes and Notices

**04/10/13:**Diplomatic Note 13-161: Establishment & Operation of Privately Contracted Visa Application Service Centers

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
#### Jon C. THOMAS, Appellant, v. JORDAN FUNERAL HOME et al., Appellees.

No. 74-92.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George Richardson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### LABOR SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CFC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and Central Louisiana Electric Company, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 6880.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 4, 1979.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1979.

Landry, Watkins & Bonin, William 0. Bonin, New Iberia, for defendant-appellant.

Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles by Marian Mayer Berkett, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee and defendant-appellant, American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.

Lewis Ray Sleeth, Jena, for defendant-appellee.

Edward G. Randolph, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WATSON, CUTRER and SWIFT, JJ.

SWIFT, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case of *Central Louisiana Electric Company v. Giant Enterprises et al.,*371 So.2d 641, we affirm the decision of the trial court at appellants’ costs.

AFFIRMED.
HomeSouth Korea

# South Korea

511 items

        -    TIAS  		Korea (09-1105) – Agreement for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Projects	  November 5, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (09-1013) – Agreement Concerning Exchange of Research and Development Information	  October 13, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (09-430) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Cooperation on Information Assurance (IA) and Computer Network Defense (CND)	  April 30, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (09-305) – Agreement Concerning Special Measures Relating to Article V of the Agreement Under Article IV of the Mutual Defense Treaty Between Korea and the US Regarding Facilities and Areas and the Status of US Armed Forces in Korea	  March 5, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (08-1229) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation to Prevent and Combat Crime	  December 29, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (08-1126.1) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning the Transfer of Munitions, Equipment, and Materiel from United States War Reserve Stockpile for Allies, Korea	  November 26, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (08-1027) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Communications Interoperability and Security	  October 27, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (08-219) – Agreement for the Promotion of Aviation Safety	  February 19, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (07-726.1) – Memorandum of Understanding International Concerning Collected Operating Bases at Gwanju, Gimhae, Suwon, Daegu, and Cheongju Air Bases	  July 26, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Korea (07-313) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement	  March 13, 2007 

previous page1…474849505152next page

Back to Top
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Warren G.  Lichtenstein,  Chief Executive  Officer of Gateway
Industries, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                             --------------------------
                                             Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             August 12, 2002
```
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005182EN.01002602.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles by judgment of that court of 28 April 2005 in European Community v Belgian State

(Case C-199/05)

(2005/C 182/49)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels) of 28 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 9 May 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between the European Community and the Belgian State on the following questions:

| 1. | Must the second paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, which provides that the governments of the Member States shall take the appropriate measures to remit or refund the amount of indirect taxes or sales taxes, be interpreted as meaning that a proportional duty levied in respect of decisions of courts and tribunals, given in all matters, concerning orders to pay amounts of money or securities and calculation of amounts of money or securities payable falls within its scope? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the second paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, which provides that the governments of the Member States shall take the appropriate measures to remit or refund the amount of indirect taxes or sales taxes, be interpreted as meaning that a proportional duty levied in respect of decisions of courts and tribunals, given in all matters, concerning orders to pay amounts of money or securities and calculation of amounts of money or securities payable falls within its scope?

| 2. | Must the third paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, which provides that no exemption shall be granted in respect of a mere charge for a public utility service, be interpreted as meaning that the tax charged at the outcome of proceedings to the losing party, who is ordered to pay a specified amount, constitutes a mere charge for a public utility service? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the third paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, which provides that no exemption shall be granted in respect of a mere charge for a public utility service, be interpreted as meaning that the tax charged at the outcome of proceedings to the losing party, who is ordered to pay a specified amount, constitutes a mere charge for a public utility service?

---
§ 551.310 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 551.310 .
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               12058
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     23609
<PP&E>                                              252989
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (252435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       26359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               338548
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         114102
<COMMON>                                              8736
<OTHER-SE>                                         (435027)  <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         26359
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        65471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    4045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (69512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (69512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (69512)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.01)

<FN>
<F1>
Additional paid in capital and retained earnings
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1998                 
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            624,562
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     661,051
<ALLOWANCES>                       15,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,485,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,949,498
<PP&E>                          1,902,651
<DEPRECIATION>                    808,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,201,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             597,413
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           16,598
<OTHER-SE>                      2,686,882 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,201,995
<SALES>                         1,406,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,406,103
<CGS>                             673,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     673,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  755,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 24,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (29,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (29,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (29,516)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.02)
        


</TABLE>