alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeLatvia

# Latvia

106 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy and Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center Rubin’s Travel to Moldova and Latvia	  September 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Latvia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Transatlantic Fellow Program Deepens Bonds Between United States and Europe	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Latvia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Laos	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Latvian Foreign Minister Rinkevics	  March 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Latvia	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 6, 2022	  Ned PriceDecember 6, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Latvia National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 18, 2022 

previous page1234…11next page

Back to Top
HomeNorth Macedonia

# North Macedonia

113 items

        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (13011) – Agreement Concerning the Reciprocal Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  December 10, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (97-605) – Defense Assistance Agreement	  June 5, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		North Macedonia (96-405) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  April 5, 1996 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  February 8, 2007
    /s/ Bruce J. BarrettBruce J. Barrett,President and Chief
Executive OfficerDated:  February 8, 2007
    /s/ William M. IaconaWilliam M. Iacona,Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, Controller and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

United Airlines, 

Complainant, 

v. 

Port Authority ofNew York and 

New Jersey (P ANYNJ) 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-13 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration based on the above referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with the FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 16. 

Additional time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of the 

matters before the agency. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 14 CFR part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's 

Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to March 10, 2017. 

Kevin . Willis Date 

Direc r, Office of Airport 

Com liance and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 2, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class, postage paid) and to be emailed at the addresses below or personally 

delivered a true copy of the foregoing Order addressed to: 

For Complainant 

Robert S. Span 

Steinbrecher & Span LLP 

1155 F. Street, NW, Suite 1050 

Washington, DC 20004 

rspan(@.steinbrecherspan.com 

Marc L. Warren 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

mwarren@crowell.com 

For Respondent 

Carlene V. Mcintyre 

The Port Authority ofNew York and New Jersey 

225 Park A venue South 

New York, NY 10003 

cmcintyr(

. 

a! panynj. gov 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00 

FAA Airports Division, Eastern Region 

@u~ Office of Airport Compliance and 

~ Management Analysis
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Cancellation:*                     The notice was originally published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 14, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 133) [page 34026]. The following panels are cancelled: D, F, K, L and M.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Brenda Colley-Gilbert, PhD, Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CCCH, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone (770) 488-6295.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: August 26, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-21379 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Harriet W. Bliss, Respondent, *v.*George H. Coryell, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1898.)

Appeal to Appellate Term — Eeview of final order In summary pro-, ceedings.

Where a review is sought of a final order in summalry proceedings, the return should show all that took place before .the justice prior to his signing the order, but matters which transpired thereafter cannot be considered nor be made a part of the return.

Motion to amend return.

Dowd & O’Brien, for appellant.

W. O. Campbell, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think that the return in this case should! be amended so as to set forth all that took place before the justice prior to the signing of the final order. We are satisfied that we have nothing to do with anything which took place in the matter thereafter, in view of the fact that the only appeal which can be taken to this court in summary proceedings is from such order. Where a review of the, final order is sought, matters which transpired after it was made cannot, therefore, be relevant to the question of the propriety of such order, which must stand or fall only upon the proceedings which were terminated by its entry.

The motion is, therefore, granted to the extent above specified.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Motion granted to extent above specified.
HomeBahrain

# Bahrain

109 items

        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Kristen Welker of NBC’s Meet the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 22, 2023Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahraini Crown Prince-Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa	  October 13, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Israel, Jordan , Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt, October 11-18, 2023	   
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 26, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Third Anniversary of the Signing of the Abraham Accords	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Bahrain (23-1020) – Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 13, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 13, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bahraini Crown Prince and Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa At a Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement Signing Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 13, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C.  

previous page1234…11next page

Back to Top
# Sint Maarten

13 items

        -    Press Statement  		Sint Maarten National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 13, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Sint Maarten	  November 11, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Sint Maarten	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Sint Maarten National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 11, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Maarten	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Sint Maarten Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 11, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Maarten	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Maarten	  June 25, 2020 

12next page

Back to Top
# C_2005217EN.01003201.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/32

---

Removal from the register of Case C-81/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/64)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 8 June 2005 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-81/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling Arbeitsgericht Berlin): Veronika Richert v VK GmbH Service Gesellschaft für Vermögenszuordnung und Kommunalisierung mbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
# Somalia

91 items

        -    Report  		Somalia	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Stabilization Assistance Review: A Framework for Maximizing the Effectiveness of U.S. Government Efforts To Stabilize Conflict-Affected Areas	  July 5, 2018 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		Somalia Sanctions	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		Evaluation of Assistance to Somali Police Force (SPF) Joint Investigative Teams (JITs) [PDF]	  January 1, 2017 

previous page1…78910next page

Back to Top
HomeTogo

# Togo

56 items

        -    		United States Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability: Country and Region Plans	  March 22, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Countering the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  February 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Marrakesh Co-Chairs’ Summary	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Ian J. McCary, Deputy Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS	  December 5, 2023BRUSSELS HUB 
        -    DipNote  		A Model and Catalyst for Fighting Violent Extremism in West Africa:  The Expanding U.S.-Togo Partnership	  Anne A. WitkowskyOctober 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Togo	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Togo National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint 10-Year Plans for the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  March 27, 2023 

123…6next page

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01001603.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/16

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2005

in Case T-188/02: Freiberger Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. Produktions- und Vertriebs KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2005/C 229/34)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-188/02: Freiberger Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. Produktions- und Vertriebs KG, established in Berlin, represented by K.-D. Rathke, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Roberto Traiteur SASU (formerly Roberto S.A.), established in Chevilly (France), represented by R. Milchior, lawyer, — action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 February 2002 (Case R 1155/2000-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Freiberger Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. Produktions- und Vertriebs KG and Roberto S.A. — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application.

| 2. | Each of the parties shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each of the parties shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 2002 of 24. 8. 2002.

1

---
40705.

#### WHALEY v. HOLT et al.

*229Decided September 9, 1964.

*Victor K.*Meador, for plaintiff in error.

*E. T. Hendon, Jr.,*contra.

*230Bell, Presiding Judge.

By admission of counsel for the plaintiff in error the petition in this case does not sound in contract but rests upon the tort of fraud and deceit.

“In Georgia the essential elements of a cause of action for the common-law tort of deceit based upon fraud have been stated to be: . . . (4) the speaker’s knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth; . . .” *Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc.,*105 Ga. App. 846, 847 (1) (125 SE2d 717); *Daugert v. Holland Furnace Co.,*107 Ga. App. 566, 569 (130 SE2d 763); *Snow’s Laundry &c. Co. v. Ga. Power Co.,*61 Ga. App. 402, 405 (6 SE2d 159).

The petition is lacking at least in the essential averment that the defendants had actual knowledge of the defective mechanical condition of the automobile sold to the plaintiff. The petition alleges that the defendants “knew or should have known the condition of the car” and “knew or should have known that said car was worthless for the purpose they sold it to this plaintiff.” ■ These allegations assert at most a constructive knowledge on the part of the defendants and this is not enough.

Where alternative allegations of knowledge are attacked by general demurrer: (1) the petition is sufficient to withstand attack *where the duty to know arises from the relationship;*(2) but the petition must capitulate to the demurrer *where the duty does not arise by reason of the relationship but arises only after actual knowledge. Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel,*104 Ga. App. 731, 734 (122 SE2d 751); and see the numerous cases *Hillinghorst*cites. Here the relationship between the parties was merely that involving a sale of personal property with no extenuating circumstances pleaded. In this status the duty of the defendants to know of the falsity of their representation does not arise unless the petition charges them with actual knowledge.

The petition having alleged only constructive knowledge by the defendants of the falsity of their representations where an allegation of actual knowledge is essential, the trial court properly dismissed the petition on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
No. 99-1896.

#### Terhune, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al. *v.*Shuaibe, aka Guillory.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pau-peris*granted. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

 11 a.m., Friday September 18, 2009.

# Place:

 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

 Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-21152 Filed 8-28-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
- USSC Home
- About Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...United States Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

# United States Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

## 				Our Mission			

					The USSC coordinates with the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority to enhance security cooperation; leads coalition efforts in advising the Palestinian Authority on security sector reform; and recommends opportunities for nations and international organizations to contribute to the development of a self-sustaining Palestinian security sector.				

Back to Top
# Sudan

243 items

        -    Report  		Sudan	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Sudan	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…22232425next page

Back to Top
#### § 405.1130 Effect of the Council's decision.

The Council's decision is final and binding on all parties unless a Federal district court issues a decision modifying the Council's decision or the decision is revised as the result of a reopening in accordance with § 405.980. A party may file an action in a Federal district court within 60 calendar days after the date it receives notice of the Council's decision.

[74 FR 65338, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5124, Jan. 17, 2017]
# Somalia

92 items

        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Somalia	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Somalia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Somalia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Somalia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Somalia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		Counterterrorism Assistance to the Somali Police Force Joint Investigative Teams	  May 20, 2019 
        -    		Somalia	  April 22, 2019 

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top
#### Charles G. Smith, Appellant, *against*S. Morris Pryor *et al.,*Respondents.

(Decided April 7th, 1890.)

No appeal lies to the Court of Common Pleas from an order of the City Court of Hew York either granting or denying a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

No appeal lies to the Court of Common Pleas from an order of the City Court of Hew York refusing a new trial for alleged misdirection to the jury, unless an exception thereto has been taken upon the trial.

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court of New York affirming an order of that court denying a motion for a new trial, upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, and upon the ground of error in the charge of the justice to the jury.

*170
      *Saunders, Webb, Worcester,*for appellant.

*Lowrey, Stone, $ Auerbach,*for respondents.

J. F. Daly, J.

No appeal lies to this court from an order of the City Court either granting or denying a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence *(Lesser*v. *Wunder,*9 Daly 70). The Court of Common Pleas holds the same position with respect to the City Court of New York City which the Court of Appeals holds with respect to the Supreme Court and the Superior City Courts *(Walsh*v. *Schultz,*6 N. Y. Civ. Pro. Rep. 126; *Rowe*v. *Cornley,*11 Daly 318) ; and the Court of Appeals will not entertain an appeal from an order of the last named courts granting or refusing a new trial *(Donley*v. *Graham,*48 N. Y. 658; *Smith*v. *Platt,*96 N. Y. 635, and cases cited). The court below did not refuse to exercise its discretion for want of power, or for any other reason, and the authorities cited by the appellant are not therefore in point.

No appeal lies to this court from an order of the City Court refusing a new trial for alleged misdirection to the jury, unless an exception thereto has been taken upon the trial. “ When a trial and general verdict have been had we can deal only with questions of law arising upon exceptions duly taken.” *(Rowe*v. *Qornley,*11 Daly 318). There was no exception taken to the alleged misdirection of the judge pending the trial, and there is nothing for us to review.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements *(Burin*v. *Simmons,*14 Daly 456; 15 N. Y. St. Rep. 370).

Larbemobe, Ch. J., and Bischoff, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs.