alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[110th Congress Public Law 311]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ311.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3012]]

Public Law 110-311
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 300 Quarropas Street in White Plains, New York, as the ``Charles L. 
            Brieant, Jr., Federal Building and United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Aug. 12, 2008 -  [H.R. 6340]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 300 
Quarropas Street in White Plains, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Charles L. Brieant, Jr., Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Charles L. Brieant, Jr., Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

    Approved August 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6340:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            July 29, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 569.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( a ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 569.201; or
( b ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0680 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 247

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

2.0 $ 170.00 $9,340 $9,510.00 17 $161,670.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $161,670 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- C**  **ondition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be use d to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Fl exibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: This AD will affect small number of transport airlplanes operated by large carriers, such as Fede ral Express. **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO
* Explanation:
#### Michael A. BAGGETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46348.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 3, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed. 302 So.2d 206.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
### APPENDIX

– A : DJI Inspire 1 Technical Specifications

Envision will only utilizes safe and reliable UAS. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS production. DJI

UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will not allow

flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a

predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition,

DJI software provides real

- time altitude and location informat ion to the PIC via the linked monitor

(smart phone/tablet devices)

DJI Inspire 1

– Aircraft

Model T600

Weight (Battery Included) 6lbs 7.5291oz (2935g)

Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) Vertical: 0.5m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 3000/s; Ya w: 1500/s

Max Tilt Angle 350

Max Ascent Speed 5m/s

Max Descent Speed 4m/s

Max Speed 22m/s (ATTI mode, no wind

- NOT RECOMMENDED)

Max Flight Altitude 4500m

Max Wind Resistance 10m/s

Max Flight Time Approximately 18 minutes

Motor Model DJI 3510

Prop eller Model DJI 1345

Operating Temperature Range 140F to 1040F (

- 100C to 400C)

Dimensions 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12”

DJI Inspire 1

– Gimbal

Model ZENMUSE X3

Output Power (with camera) Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W

Operating Current Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA

Angular Vibration Range ±0.030

Mounting Detachable

Con trollable Range Pitch:

- 900 to +300; Pan: ±3200

Mechanical Range Pitch:

- 1250 to 450; Pan: ±3300

Max Controllable Speed Pitch: 1200/s; Pan: 1800/s

DJI Inspire 1

– Camera

Name X3

Model FC350

Total Pixels 12.76M

Effective Pixels 12.4M

Image Max Size 4000x3000

ISO Range 100

- 3200

Field of View 940

CMOS Sony EXMOR 1/2.3”

HD Video Recording UHD(4K): 4096x 2160p24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30

FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48 /50/60

HD: 1280x720p24/2 5/30/48/50/60Operating Temperature Range 320F

- 1040F (00C

- 400C)

DJI Inspire 1

– Transmitter

Name C1

Operating Frequency 5.728

- 5.850GHz; 2.400

- 2.483GHz

Communi cating Distance (unobstructed) 2000m

Output Power 9W

Operating Temperature Range 140F t o 1040F (

- 100C to 400C)

Battery 600mAh LiPo 2S
No. 00-5868.

#### Davenport *v.*Wingard, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 700.10 Vehicular and pedestrian traffic. ( a ) Drivers of all vehicles on the property shall drive in a careful and safe manner at all times and shall comply with the signals and directions of security officers and all posted traffic signs. All persons on the property must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws. All drivers operating a vehicle on property roadways must possess a valid driver's license.
( b ) The blocking of entrances, driveways, walks, loading platforms, or fire-hydrants in or on the property is prohibited.
( c ) Parking is permitted only in authorized locations.
( d ) This section may be supplemented from time to time by the Director by the issuance and posting of traffic directives. When so issued and posted, such directives shall have the same force and effect as if made a part hereof.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 7 July 2005

in Case C-214/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil obligations - Substances harmful to the ozone layer - Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 - Maintenance of derogations not provided for in the regulation)

(2005/C 229/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-214/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker and A. Aresu) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by G. Fiengo) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 19 May 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, P. Kūris and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 190 of 24.7.2004.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2894 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2894

For the relief of the 7 individuals who were terminated from employment 
          with the White House Travel Office on May 19, 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1996

 Mr. Salmon (for himself, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Souder, Mr. Davis, Mr. Baker 
     of Louisiana, Mr. Greenwood, Mrs. Chenoweth, and Mr. Stearns) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of the 7 individuals who were terminated from employment 
          with the White House Travel Office on May 19, 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Travelgate Victims Restitution 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, there shall be paid, out of funds appropriated 
before the date of the enactment of this Act for use by the Executive 
Office of the President, to each of the 7 individuals who were 
terminated from employment with the White House Travel Office on May 
19, 1993, the amount described in subsection (b).
    (b) Amount of Payment.--(1) The amount to be paid to each 
individual under subsection (a) shall be the sum of legal defense 
expenses incurred by that individual as a result of any investigation 
of the operations of the White House Travel Office or of the individual 
in connection with the operations of the White House Travel Office, 
conducted by any Federal agency, or any indictment or prosecution which 
resulted from any such investigation, less amounts described in 
paragraph (2).
    (2) The amount paid pursuant to this Act to an individual for legal 
defense expenses described in paragraph (1) shall be reduced by any 
amount received before the date of the enactment of this Act, without 
obligation for repayment by the individual, for payment of such legal 
defense expenses (including any amount received from the funds 
appropriated for the individual in the matter relating to the ``Office 
of the General Counsel'' under the heading ``Office of the Secretary'' 
in title I of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1994).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

    No more than 10 percent of the payment authorized by this Act shall 
be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered 
in connection with obtaining such payment, any contract to the contrary 
notwithstanding. Any person who violates this section shall be fined 
not more than $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                             VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
 
 1. VLSI Technology GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.
 
 2. VLSI Technology Limited, incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom.
 
 3. VLSI Technology France Holding SARL, incorporated under the laws of France.
 
 4. VLSI Technology K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan.
 
 5. VLSI Technology Asia Limited, incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong.
 
 6. VLSI India, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.
 
 7. VLSI Technology Italia SRL, incorporated under the laws of Italy.
 
 8. COMPASS Design Automation, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.
 
 9. COMPASS Design Automation EURL, incorporated under the laws of France.
 
10. COMPASS Design Automation, GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.
 
11. COMPASS Design Automation International B.V., incorporated under the laws of
    The Netherlands.
 
12. COMPASS Design Automation Italia SRL, incorporated under the laws of Italy.
 
13. COMPASS Japan K.K., incorporated under the laws of Japan.
 
14. ComAtlas S.A., incorporated under the laws of France.
 
15. VLSI Foreign Sales Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the U.S.
    Virgin Islands.
 
16. COMPASS Foreign Sales Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the U.S.
    Virgin Islands.
 
17. VLSI Technology France EURL, incorporated under the laws of France.
 
18. VLSI Technology Wireless Communication Research EURL, incorporated under the
    laws of France.
 
19. Cooperative Silicon Systems GmbH, incorporated under the laws of Germany.
 
20. 12787 Yukon Inc., incorporated under the laws of Canada.
 
21. Cooperative Silicon Systems Ltd., incorporated under the laws of
    Switzerland.
# C_2005257EN.01001102.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/11

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2005 — Dionyssopoulou v Council

(Case T-320/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Invalidity pension - Correction coefficient - Meaning of ‘residence’ - United Kingdom)

(2005/C 257/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties:

Applicant: Triantafyllia Dionyssopoulou (represented by: C. Quackels and M.-C. Gautier, lawyers).

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Sims and I. Diez Parra, acting as Agents).

Defendant:

Application for:

Annulment of the Council's decision of 12 December 2003 applying the correction coefficient for Greece to the applicant's pension, and damages.

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action.

| 2) | Orders both parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders both parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273 of 6.11.2004.

1

---
Exhibit23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNT**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of our report, dated February 2, 2001 (February 26, 2001 as to note3) with respect to the financial statements of Datakey, Inc. (the “Company”)included in this Form 10-KSB into the Company’s previously filed RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 No. 33-14144, No. 33-47068, No. 33-67280, No. 333-11405,No. 33-80894, No. 333-43937, No. 333-83999 and 333-39556 and on Form S-3 No.333-56711, No. 333-84007, No. 333-91779, No. 333-90969, No. 333-94087 and No.333-33332.

 

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 29, 2001
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...Office of the Ombudsman

# Office of the Ombudsman

## 				Our Mission			

					The Department of State Office of the Ombudsman handles workplace conflicts that are not currently in a formal process and helps employees identify mutually satisfactory solutions.				

Back to Top
#### Ramon THOMPSON v. STATE of Mississippi. Melvin MOORE v. STATE of Mississippi.

Nos. 51274, 51275.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 11, 1979.

Rainer & Sumrall, William Andy Sumrall, Pearl, for appellant.

SUGG, J.,

for the Court.

MOTIONS SUSTAINED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           11223
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     126758
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           15237
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             15441
<LOANS>                                         224130
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  393846
<DEPOSITS>                                      283546
<SHORT-TERM>                                     13326
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               5130
<LONG-TERM>                                      59410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                       31113
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  393846
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   5281
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2239
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  7521
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3820
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3701
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 320
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2169
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1578
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.28
<LOANS-NON>                                        837
<LOANS-PAST>                                         8
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3822
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4134
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      109
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4186
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4186
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           3158
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005189EN.01001001.xml

| 3.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3778 — Böhler-Uddeholm/Buderus)

(2005/C 189/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3778. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3778. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-13980

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00446-SCB-CPT-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

CARLOS SANCHEZ-VILLA, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 23, 2019)

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 18-13980 Date Filed: 08/23/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Grady Irvin, appointed counsel for Carlos Sanchez-Villa in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Sanchez-Villa’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-13980 Date Filed: 08/23/2019 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000725876
<NAME>                        GATEWAY INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,630
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    725
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,402
<PP&E>                                           337
<DEPRECIATION>                                    80
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            636
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           4
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,216
<SALES>                                          963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 963
<CGS>                                            187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.07)



</TABLE>