alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005268EN.01001601.xml

| 28.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3735 — Finmeccanica/AMS)

(2005/C 268/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3735. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3735. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Italy

267 items

        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Special Envoy Fowler’s Remarks During the Panel on Value Chains for Resilient Food Systems at the UN Food Systems Summit +2 Stocktaking Moment	  Cary  FowlerJuly 25, 2023Rome, Italy 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with G7 Foreign Ministers and the High Representative of the EU	  June 24, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to Rome, Vatican City, Brussels, and Paris	  June 18, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Italy 	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 12, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Resettlement Diplomacy Network Senior Officials Meeting	  June 2, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Transatlantic Fellow Program Deepens Bonds Between United States and Europe	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Italy National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 2, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		VACS Phase 1 Technical Workshop	  May 19, 2023 

previous page1…45678…27next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Paul M. GOODLEY.

No. 65131.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 16, 1979.

In re Paul M. Goodley, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Fourteenth JDC, Calcasieu Parish. No. RC 350-79.

Writ granted. The trial judge is instructed to set bail.
#### Bradford *v.*Potts.

Where a purchaser has notice of an outstanding claim of title, and takes a deed with general warranty, he cannot set up that title as a defence to an action on a mortgage for the purchase-money, when his possession has not been disturbed: nor is it material that he was misled as to the nature of the adverse title by a statement of the vendor’s agent.

In error from the Common Pleas of Bradford.

*July*14.

This was a *scire facias*on a mortgage by Bradford to Potts, to secure the purchase-money of land conveyed by Potts to Bradford, with a general warranty. The defence taken was an outstanding title in one Lewis; but it appeared that when Bradford was about purchasing, he was informed by Lewis that he had a claim to the land. It also appeared that the agent of Potts had said to Bradford that he supposed this to refer to a claim of title in one Wilson, and that he did not think it amounted to anything. The court (Conyngham, P. J.) instructed the jury this was immaterial, since Lewis had not restricted or specified the nature of his claim, and that the purchaser must look to his covenant, should he be ejected under Lewis’s title.

*Case,*for plaintiff in error.

*Williston.*and *Overton,*control.

Burnside, J.

It lay on’the defendant in this action to show that the title he had accepted was positively bad, and that there was a superior and indisputable title in another person, asserting such title : 5 W. & S. 51. The action was not on a contract, but a *scire facias*on the mortgage to compel the payment of the balance of the piu’chase-money. On a contract executed, even to show the title doubtful, would not avail the defendant: W. 57. Here there was no covenant broken. The plaintiff in error accepted the title, and took his warranty with full knowledge of the alleged adverse title. He shall not detain the purchase-money when his possession has not been disturbed: Lighty *v.*Shorb, 3 Penn. 447.

Neither the bills of exception to evidence, nor the errors assigned to the charge, have any foundation in law to support them.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997  
<CASH>                                    12,441,200   
<SECURITIES>                               3,900,500   
<RECEIVABLES>                                 60,700   
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          16,402,400         
<PP&E>                                    32,199,900          
<DEPRECIATION>                            10,038,500      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            44,066,600       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     11,404,700
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0               
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                32,613,300        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              44,066,600
<SALES>                                            0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,346,000
<CGS>                                              0           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,203,900           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             146,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0               
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,563,100        
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,563,100       
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0                        
<NET-INCOME>                               1,563,100  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  15.15  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  15.15  
        

</TABLE>
§ 802.232 Principal place of business. ( a ) The term *principal place of business* means, subject to paragraph (b) of this section, the primary location where an entity's management directs, controls, or coordinates the entity's activities, or, in the case of an investment fund, where the fund's activities are primarily directed, controlled, or coordinated by or on behalf of the general partner, managing member, or equivalent.
( b ) If the location determined under paragraph (a) of this section is in the United States and the entity has represented to the U.S. Government or a subnational government of the United States or any foreign government, in the most recent submission or filing to such government (other than a submission or filing to the Committee) in which the entity has identified its principal place of business, principal office and place of business, address of principal executive offices, address of headquarters, or equivalent, that any of the foregoing is outside the United States, then the location identified in such submission or filing is deemed for purposes of this definition to be the entity's principal place of business unless the entity can demonstrate that such location has changed to the United States since such submission or filing.
[85 FR 3166, Jan. 17, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 45313, July 28, 2020]
HomeChile

# Chile

120 items

        -    TIAS  		Chile (20-930) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material	  September 30, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Chile	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Chile	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Chile	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Chile	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Chile	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Chile	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Chile	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Chile	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Chile	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…789101112next page

Back to Top
§ 594.305 Information or informational materials. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term *information or informational materials* includes, but is not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds. Note to paragraph ( a
):
To be considered information or informational materials, artworks must be classified under chapter heading 9701, 9702, or 9703 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( b ) The term *information or informational materials,* with respect to United States exports, does not include items: ( 1 ) That were, as of April 30, 1994, or that thereafter became, controlled for export pursuant to section 5 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2401-2420 (1979) (the “EAA”), or section 6 of the EAA to the extent that such controls promote the nonproliferation or antiterrorism policies of the United States; or
( 2 ) With respect to which acts are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 37.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John Charles STEIN, Jr. v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden et al.

No. 80-KH-1551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re John Charles Stein, Jr., applying for writs of habeas corpus and supervisory. Parish of Caddo. Nos. 94-047 and 94-048.

Writ denied.
§ 1001.1801 Waivers of exclusions. ( a ) The OIG has the authority to grant or deny a request from the administrator of a Federal health care program (as defined in section 1128B(f) of the Act) that an exclusion from that program be waived with respect to an individual or entity, except that no waiver may be granted with respect to an exclusion under § 1001.101(b). The request must be in writing and from an individual directly responsible for administering the Federal health care program.
( b ) With respect to exclusions under § 1001.101(a), (c), or (d), a request from a Federal health care program for a waiver of the exclusion will be considered only if the Federal health care program administrator determines that— ( 1 ) The individual or entity is the sole community physician or the sole source of essential specialized services in a community; and
( 2 ) The exclusion would impose a hardship on beneficiaries (as defined in section 1128A(i)(5) of the Act) of that program.
( c ) With respect to exclusions imposed under subpart C of this part, a request for waiver will only be granted if the OIG determines that imposition of the exclusion would not be in the public interest.
( d ) If the basis for the waiver ceases to exist, the waiver will be rescinded, and the individual or entity will be excluded for the period remaining on the exclusion, measured from the time the exclusion would have been imposed if the waiver had not been granted.
( e ) In the event a waiver is granted, it is applicable only to the program(s) for which waiver is requested.
( f ) The decision to grant, deny or rescind a request for a waiver is not subject to administrative or judicial review.
[57 FR 3330, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 82 FR 4116, Jan. 12, 2017]
§ 1006.3 Service and fees. ( a ) A subpoena under this part will be served by— ( 1 ) Delivering a copy to the individual named in the subpoena;
( 2 ) Delivering a copy to the entity named in the subpoena at its last principal place of business; or
( 3 ) Registered or certified mail addressed to such individual or entity at its last known dwelling place or principal place of business.
( b ) A verified return by the individual serving the subpoena setting forth the manner of service or, in the case of service by registered or certified mail, the signed return post office receipt, will be proof of service.
( c ) Witnesses will be entitled to the same fees and mileage as witnesses in the district courts of the United States (28 U.S.C. 1821 and 1825). Such fees need not be paid at the time the subpoena is served.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ George S. Rapp                     |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Executive      Vice President and      |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer           |   |
|   | Harleysville      National Corporation |   |
|   | Date:      March 12, 2010              |   |
§ 1003.610 Amount of penalties. ( a ) The OIG may impose a penalty of not more than— ( 1 ) $5,000 for each individual violation resulting from the misuse of Departmental, CMS, or Medicare or Medicaid program words, letters, symbols, or emblems as described in § 1003.600(a) relating to printed media;
( 2 ) $5,000 for each individual violation in the case of such misuse related to an electronic communication, Web page, or telemarketing solicitation;
( 3 ) $25,000 for each individual violation in the case of such misuse related to a broadcast or telecast.
( b ) For purposes of this paragraph, a violation is defined as— ( 1 ) In the case of a direct mailing solicitation or advertisement, each separate piece of mail that contains one or more words, letters, symbols, or emblems related to a determination under § 1003.600(a);
( 2 ) In the case of a printed solicitation or advertisement, each reproduction, reprinting, or distribution of such item related to a determination under § 1003.600(a);
( 3 ) In the case of a broadcast or telecast, each airing of a single commercial or solicitation related to a determination under § 1003.600(a);
( 4 ) In the case of an electronic communication, each dissemination, viewing, or accessing of the electronic communication that contains one or more words, letters, symbols, or emblems related to a determination under § 1003.600(a);
( 5 ) In the case of a Web page accessed by a computer or other electronic means, each instance in which the Web page was viewed or accessed and that Web page contains one or more words, letters, symbols, or emblems related to a determination under § 1003.600(a); and
( 6 ) In the case of a telemarketing solicitation, each individual unsolicited telephone call regarding an item or service under Medicare or Medicaid related to a determination under § 1003.600(a).
[81 FR 88357, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42841, July 3, 2023]
§ 136.371 Eligibility. To be eligible for a pregraduate scholarship grant under this subdivison an applicant must: ( a ) Be an Indian;
( b ) Have successfully completed high school education or high school equivalency;
( c ) Have demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Secretary the desire and capability to successfully complete courses of study in a pregraduate education program meeting the criteria in § 136.370;
( d ) Be accepted for enrollment in or be enrolled in any accredited pregraduate education curriculum meeting the criteria in § 136.370 of this subdivision; and
( e ) Be a citizen of the United States.
[49 FR 7381, Feb. 29, 1984. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002]
§ 1003.320 Determinations regarding the amount of penalties and assessments and the period of exclusion. In considering the factors listed in § 1003.140: ( a ) It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if all the items, services, or violations included in the action brought under this part were of the same type and occurred within a short period of time; there were few such items, services, or violations; and the total amount claimed or requested for such items or services was less than $5,000.
( b ) Aggravating circumstances include— ( 1 ) The violations were of several types or occurred over a lengthy period of time;
( 2 ) There were many such items, services, or violations (or the nature and circumstances indicate a pattern of claims or requests for payment for such items or services or a pattern of violations);
( 3 ) The amount claimed or requested for such items or services or the amount of the remuneration was $50,000 or more; or
( 4 ) The violation resulted, or could have resulted, in harm to the patient, a premature discharge, or a need for additional services or subsequent hospital admission.
#### § 136.3 Administrative instructions.

The service periodically issues administrative instructions to its officers and employees, which are primarily found in the *Indian Health Service Manual* and the Area Office and program office supplements. These instructions are operating procedures to assist officers and employees in carrying out their responsibilities, and are not regulations establishing program requirements which are binding upon members of the general public.
# Bosnia and Herzegovina

99 items

        -    Report  		Bosnia and Herzegovina	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Bosnia and Herzegovina	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (10-930) – Agreement on the Protection and Preservation on Certain Cultural Properties	  September 30, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (06-1128.2) – Amendment to Agreement of January 6 and 7, 1996 Regarding Defense Cooperation	  November 28, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (06-1128.1) – Agreement on Status Protections and Access to and Use of Facilities and Areas	  November 28, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (05-1122.2) – Agreement Concerning Cooperating in the Area of Prevention of Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Promotion of Defense and Military Relations	  November 22, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (05-1122.1) – Air Transport Agreement	  November 22, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (03-707.3) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  July 7, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Bosnia and Herzegovina (01-226) – Agreement concerning the Program of the Peace Corps	  February 26, 2001 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
#### § 137.287 What is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

The NEPA is a procedural law that requires Federal agencies to follow established environmental review procedures, which include reviewing and documenting the environmental impact of their actions. NEPA establishes a comprehensive policy for protection and enhancement of the environment by the Federal Government; creates the Council on Environmental Quality in the Office of the President; and directs Federal agencies to carry out the policies and procedures of the Act. CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) establish three levels of environmental review: categorical exclusions, environmental assessments, and environmental impact statements.
§ 552.506 Investment and reinvestment of certain funds. Subject to the requirements of § 552.203, U.S. financial institutions are authorized to invest and reinvest assets blocked pursuant to § 552.201, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The assets representing such investments and reinvestments are credited to a blocked account or subaccount that is held in the same name at the same U.S. financial institution, or within the possession or control of a U.S. person, but funds shall not be transferred outside the United States for this purpose;
( b ) The proceeds of such investments and reinvestments shall not be credited to a blocked account or subaccount under any name or designation that differs from the name or designation of the specific blocked account or subaccount in which such funds or securities were held; and
( c ) No immediate financial or economic benefit accrues (e.g., through pledging or other use) to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201.
#### § 589.334 Shale projects.

The term *shale projects* as used in § 589.205 includes projects that have the potential to produce oil from resources located in shale formations as well as projects that have the potential to produce oil from resources located in fine-grained sedimentary rock formations including shale, limestone, dolomites, sandstones, and clay.