alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006010EN.01002602.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/26

---

Action brought on 20 October 2005 — Ole Eistrup v European Parliament

(Case T-389/05)

(2006/C 10/52)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant(s): Ole Eistrup (Knebel, Denmark) (represented by: S. E. Hjelmborg, advokat)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): European Parliament

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decision of 13 December 2004 and the defendant's reply of 12 July 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision of 13 December 2004 and the defendant's reply of 12 July 2005;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant compensation in the amount of EUR 203 357 for lost earnings in the period 1 June 1998 to 1 September 2002, together with interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant compensation in the amount of EUR 203 357 for lost earnings in the period 1 June 1998 to 1 September 2002, together with interest;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 200 000 for non-material damage, together with interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 200 000 for non-material damage, together with interest;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who is employed in the Parliament's Danish language translation division, wished to be reinstated in his post after taking leave on personal grounds from 1 August 1992 to 31 July 1996. This only became possible however from 1 October 2002, since the Parliament was not able to identify an available post corresponding to the applicant's category and qualifications before that date.

In support of his application the applicant states that he has fulfilled his obligation to mitigate his loss in connection with his claim for reimbursement of lost earnings.

The applicant also claims that the defendant's alleged unlawful handling of the matter put the applicant in a state of uncertainty and anxiety, and that the defendant's conduct constitutes a clear breach of the applicant's rights and the confidence which every citizen must have in the Community's legal system.

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meetings with Vietnamese Government Officials

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meetings with Vietnamese Government Officials							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 14, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met yesterday in Hanoi with Foreign Minister Bui Thanh Son, Vice Foreign Minister Ha Kim Ngoc, Chairman of the Communist Party of Vietnam’s Commission on External Relations Le Hoai Trung, and Deputy Minister of Defense Sr. Lt. Gen. Hoang Xuan Chien in separate meetings. In these meetings, Deputy Secretary Sherman emphasized the strength of the U.S.-Vietnam Comprehensive Partnership and the United States’ support for a strong, prosperous, and independent Vietnam. She praised Prime Minister Chinh’s successful visit to the United States to attend the U.S.-ASEAN Special Summit and welcomed Vietnam’s participation at the launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. She also reiterated the United States’ enduring commitment to war legacy and humanitarian issues, including accounting for American and Vietnamese war dead, assistance to persons with disabilities, clearing unexploded ordnance, and joint dioxin remediation. Deputy Secretary Sherman also discussed the human rights situation in Vietnam and emphasized the importance of continued bilateral dialogue.

Tags

Association of Southeast Asian NationsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripEconomic AffairsHuman RightsHumanitarian AidIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonVietnam

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350







In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Paulson Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chester L. F. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ Chester L.F. Paulson


Chester L. F. Paulson


President and Chief Executive Officer


Paulson Capital Corp.


April 30, 2013





This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retained by Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Issue Committee will be held Thursday, October 22, 2009, at 
8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact 
Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 
2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 31, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-21451 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
· 

nership 

 by the 

Protection 

 protect 

er supply 

 the mar

ts and 

ring with 

zations 

ion pro

atering 

wns and 

 tips 

new tech

 do to 

k effi

at 

h.org. 

(866) WTR-SENS (987-7367) 

www.epa.gov/watersense watersense@epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 

100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper. 

June 2008 EPA-832-K-08-001 

Watering Can
 

Be Efficient!
 

Fine-Tune Your Irrigation System 

to Save Water and Money 
r a healthy, drought- and stress-tolerant lawn and landscape, use less water. Adopting water-savvy habits also is essential to maintaining and extending your community’s water supply, especially during peak use. Water-efficient habits will result in a healthier 

nd landscape, in addition to conserving water and saving money. With some simple 

ces and new technology, existing irrigation systems can be made more efficient— 

ng your water bill, reducing run off, and eliminating waste. 

ve plants in 

e less care and 

ies—and 

nd garden 

 

n your lawn 

does not 

 plants too 

ults in shallow 

and fungus. 

d your 

with the set

schedule rarely applies to all zones in the system. 

Make it a date. Inspect 

your irrigation system monthly. Check for leaks, broken or clogged heads, and other problems, or engage an irrigation professional to regularly check your system. Clean micro-irrigation filters as needed. 

Get your head adjusted. Correct obstructions in sprinkler heads that prevent sprinklers 

from distributing water evenly. Keep water off pavement and structures. 

Check for WaterSense! A certified irrigation professional can design, install, maintain, or audit your system to ensure optimal efficiency using the proper amount of water to maintain a healthy landscape. Ask if your irrigation contractor is a WaterSense partner, which means he or she has been certified through a program that focuses on water efficiency. 

Get smart. Climate or soil 

moisture sensor-based “smart” controllers evaluate weather or soil moisture conditions, then calculate and automatically adjust the irrigation schedule to meet the specific needs of your landscape. 

Flip to a switch. Rain shutoff switches, 

required by law in many states, turn off your system in rainy weather and help compensate for natural rainfall. This inexpensive device can be retrofitted to almost any system. 

Easy does it. Install low-volume microirrigation for gardens, trees, and shrubs. 

Micro-irrigation includes drip (also known as trickle), micro-spray jets, micro-sprinklers, or bubbler irrigation to irrigate slowly and minimize evaporation, runoff, and overspray. 

Watch the clock. Water when the sun is 

low or down, winds are calm, and temperatures are cool—between the evening and early morning—to reduce evaporation. You can lose as much as 30 percent of water to evaporation by watering midday.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         153,143
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             116
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    239,325
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         775,163
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           779,708
<LOANS>                                      1,487,263
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,975,580
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,138,715
<SHORT-TERM>                                   375,997
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             35,223
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       425,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,975,580
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                155,113
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               60,722
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,865
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               217,700
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              56,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,715
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          142,985
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 371
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                106,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,022
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      87,022
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,582
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,101
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 72,375
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,348
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,678
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,114
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         13,564
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**Certification
      Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the chief financial officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies,
      to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAB
      Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
      certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
      purpose.





Dated
      this 16th day of March, 2006.







*/s/
                Donald J. Torbert, Jr.*Donald
                J. Torbert, Jr.Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer













A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
      to the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 405.1100 Medicare Appeals Council review: General. ( a ) The appellant or any other party to an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision or dismissal may request that the Council review the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision or dismissal.
( b ) Under circumstances set forth in §§ 405.1016 and 405.1108, the appellant may request that a case be escalated to the Council for a decision even if the ALJ or attorney adjudicator has not issued a decision, dismissal, or remand in his or her case.
( c ) When the Council reviews an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision, it undertakes a *de novo* review. The Council issues a final decision or dismissal order or remands a case to the ALJ or attorney adjudicator within 90 calendar days of receipt of the appellant's request for review, unless the 90 calendar day period is extended as provided in this subpart.
( d ) When deciding an appeal that was escalated from the OMHA level to the Council, the Council will issue a final decision or dismissal order or remand the case to the OMHA Chief ALJ within 180 calendar days of receipt of the appellant's request for escalation, unless the 180 calendar day period is extended as provided in this subpart.
[82 FR 5122, Jan. 17, 2017]
# C_2006015EN.01000402.xml

| 20.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4037 — Gerdau/Grupo Santander/Bogey/Sidenor)

(2006/C 15/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 1003.1120 Determinations regarding the amount of penalties.

In determining the amount of the penalty in accordance with this subpart, the OIG will consider the factors listed in § 1003.140.
# C_2006012EN.01001301.xml

| 18.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/13

---

Call for proposals — DG EAC No 59/05 — Complementary information

(2006/C 12/10)

Point 4 of call for proposals No EAC 59/05 published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 275 on 8 November 2005 stated that the applications must be sent at the latest on 30 December 2005.

Official Journal of the European Union

The text of this call invites organisations with a budgetary year that differs from the calendar year to submit their application one month before the start of their budgetary year in 2006 (point 3).

To assure a timely selection procedure the organisations concerned by this element are invited to submit their application until 6 February 2006, the post stamp being decisive.

6 February 2006

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 266 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 266

 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
       buses that do not have seat belts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
       buses that do not have seat belts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    No person shall manufacture, sell, deliver, or import any school 
bus, constructed after the effective date of this Act, for use by a 
person described in section 2 to provide transportation service, unless 
such school bus is equipped with a seat belt, with particular emphasis 
on the use of an Aaron Gordon type flight attendant double shoulder 
harness mechanism or other appropriate safety restraint device 
providing equal or greater passenger safety, for each passenger riding 
in such school bus.

SEC. 2. PERSONS TO WHICH PROHIBITION APPLIES.

    The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall apply to--
            (1) any school bus, as such term is defined in section 
        4221(d)(7)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
            (2) any Federal, State, or local government entity, school 
        district, or other public or private entity providing 
        transportation to passengers by school bus.

SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES; SECRETARY'S AUTHORITY TO COMPROMISE.

    (a) Amount of Penalties.--Whoever violates any provision of this 
Act, or any regulation issued thereunder, shall be subject to a civil 
penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each such violation. A violation with 
respect to each school bus shall constitute a separate violation, 
except that the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed $800,000 for any 
related series of violations.
    (b) Compromise of Penalties.--Any such civil penalty may be 
compromised by the Secretary of Transportation. In determining the 
amount of such penalty, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, the 
appropriateness of such penalty to the size of the business of the 
person charged and the gravity of the violation shall be considered. 
The amount of such penalty, when finally determined, or the amount 
agreed upon in compromise, may be deducted from any sums owing by the 
United States to the person charged.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of its enactment.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David TYLER.

No. 80-K-2823.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re David Tyler, applying for writ of certiorari or review. Parish of Ouachita. No. 39808.

Writ granted.
#### § 137.373 Do Federal real property laws, regulations and procedures that apply to the Secretary also apply to Self-Governance Tribes that purchase real property with funds provided under a construction project agreement?

No, unless the Self-Governance Tribe has requested the Secretary to take fee title to the property.
# Ireland

80 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Ireland	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defense Minister Coveney	  May 24, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Ireland	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ireland	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Entry Into Force of U.S.-UK Civil Air Transport Agreement	  March 26, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Occasion of St. Patrick’s Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 17, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defence Coveney	  February 15, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Ireland	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Ireland	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Ireland	  June 25, 2020 

previous page1…345678next page

Back to Top
No. 00-5832.

#### Fabrizio *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 402.109 Statistical sampling. ( a ) *Purpose.* CMS or OIG may introduce the results of a statistical sampling study to show the number and amount of claims subject to sanction under this part that the respondent presented or caused to be presented.
( b ) *Prima facie evidence.* The results of the statistical sampling study, if based upon an appropriate sampling and computed by valid statistical methods, constitute prima facie evidence of the number and amount of claims or requests for payment subject to sanction under § 402.1.
( c ) *Burden of proof.* Once CMS or OIG has made a prima facie case, the burden is on the respondent to produce evidence reasonably calculated to rebut the findings of the statistical sampling study. CMS or OIG then has the opportunity to rebut this evidence.