alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Botswana

55 items

        -    Report  		Botswana	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Botswana (14-523) – Air Transport Agreement	  May 23, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Botswana (06-1119) – Agreement Concerning the Establishment of a Tropical Forest Conservation Fund and a Tropical Forest Conservation Board	  November 19, 2006 
        -    		2006 Final Communique Plenary Session Gaborone	  November 6, 2006 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
§ 1005.20 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ will issue an initial decision, based only on the record, which will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law.
( b ) The ALJ may affirm, increase or reduce the penalties, assessment or exclusion proposed or imposed by the IG, or reverse the imposition of the exclusion. In exclusion cases where the period of exclusion commenced prior to the hearing, any period of exclusion imposed by the ALJ will be deemed to commence on the date such exclusion originally went into effect.
( c ) The ALJ will issue the initial decision to all parties within 60 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs, if permitted, has expired. The decision will be accompanied by a statement describing the right of any party to file a notice of appeal with the DAB and instructions for how to file such appeal. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she will notify the parties of the reason for the delay and will set a new deadline.
( d ) Except for exclusion actions taken in accordance with § 1001.2003 of this chapter and as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, unless the initial decision is appealed to the DAB, it will be final and binding on the parties 30 days after the ALJ serves the parties with a copy of the decision. If service is by mail, the date of service will be deemed to be 5 days from the date of mailing.
( e ) If an extension of time within which to appeal the initial decision is granted under § 1005.21(a), except as provided in § 1005.22(a), the initial decision will become final and binding on the day following the end of the extension period.
[57 FR 3350, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 65 FR 24418, Apr. 26, 2000]
#### § 598.512 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.

[86 FR 26671, May 17, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1484

SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, We the people preamble Citizen of

the United States Government National of the United States,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HENRY MCMASTER; TRACY MYERS; ROBB MCBURNEY; JIM BOGLE; SOUTH

CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION; SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (3:07-cv-02137-SB)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se. James Emory Smith, Jr.

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Wesley D.

Few, ELLIS, LAWHORNE & SIMS, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sakima Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. El Bey v. McMaster, No. 3:07-cv02137-SB (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 136.25 Reconsideration and appeals. ( a ) Any person to whom contract health services are denied shall be notified of the denial in writing together with a statement of the reason for the denial. The notice shall advise the applicant for contract health services that within 30 days from the receipt of the notice the applicant: ( 1 ) May obtain a reconsideration by the appropriate Service Unit Director of the original denial if the applicant submits additional supporting information not previously submitted; or
( 2 ) If no additional information is submitted, may appeal the original denial by the Service Unit Director to the appropriate Area or program director. A request for reconsideration or appeal shall be in writing and shall set forth the grounds supporting the request or appeal.
( b ) If the original decision is affirmed on reconsideration, the applicant shall be so notified in writing and advised that an appeal may be taken to the Area or program director within 30 days of receipt of the notice of the reconsidered decision. The appeal shall be in writing and shall set forth the grounds supporting the appeal.
( c ) If the original or reconsidered decision is affirmed on appeal by the Area or program director, the applicant shall be so notified in writing and advised that a further appeal may be taken to the Director, Indian Health Service, within 30 days of receipt of the notice. The appeal shall be in writing and shall set the grounds supporting the appeal. The decision of the Director, Indian Health Service, shall constitute final administrative action.
23.1           Auditor
Certification






March 15,
2010
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 
 Ladies
and Gentlemen:
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report (Form 10-K ) of
Viropro, Inc. of our audit report, dated March  15, 2010, relating to
the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements (and related
statements included there in) as of November 30, 2009 which appears in the
Annual Report.
 
 
 
 KBL,
LLP
 
 /s/ KBL,
LLP
 New York,
NY
 March 15,
2010








March 15,
2010


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 
 Ladies
and Gentlemen:
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report (Form 10-K ) of
Viropro, Inc. of our audit report, dated March  10, 2009, relating to
the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements (and related
statements included there in) as of November 30, 2008 which appears in the
Annual Report.
 
 
 
 De Joya
Griffith & Company, LLC
 
 /s/ De
Joya Griffith & Company, LLC
 Henderson,
NV
 March 15,
2010
§ 401.148 Administrative review. ( a ) *Review by the Administrator.* A person whose request has been denied may initiate a review by filing a request for review with the Administrator of CMS, 700 East High Rise Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235, within 30 days of receipt of the determination to deny or within 30 days of receipt of records which are in partial response to his request if a portion of a request is granted and a portion denied, whichever is later. Upon receipt of a timely request for review, the Administrator will review the decision in question and the findings upon which it was based. Upon the basis of the data considered in connection with the decision and whatever other evidence and written argument is submitted by the person requesting the review or which is otherwise obtained, the Administrator or his designee will affirm or revise in whole or in part the findings and decision in question. A decision to affirm the denial will be made only upon concurrence of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, or his designee, after consultation with the General Counsel or his or her designee, and the appropriate program policy official. Written notice of the decision of the Administrator will be mailed to the person who requested the review. A written decision will be made within 20 working days from receipt of the request for review. Extension of the time limit may be granted under the circumstances listed in § 401.136(b) to the extent that the maximum 10 days limit on extensions has not been exhausted on the initial determination. The decision will include the basis for it and will advise the requester of his right to judicial review.
( b ) *Failure of the Administrator to comply with the time limits.* Failure of the Administrator to comply with the time limits set forth in § 401.136 and this section constitutes an exhaustion of the requester's administrative remedies.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Careers

HomeBureaus & Offices > Deputy Secretary of State...Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy

# Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy

## 				Our Mission			

					The Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP) promotes U.S. national and economic security by leading, coordinating, and elevating foreign policy on cyberspace and digital technologies. It builds partnerships to shape the international environment so Americans and people everywhere can prosper. CDP strives for a world in which every person can access the opportunities that come with digital connectivity to build thriving economies and societies and works to counter challenges to this vision from authoritarian states.				

Ambassador at Large

Nathaniel C. Fick

							Follow Us:																			TwitterLinkedIn

## 											The Latest									

					September 19, 2023				

## The United States Hosts Multinational Dialogue on Securing Cyberspace

U.S. Deputy Secretary Richard R. Verma and Ambassador at Large for Cyberspace and Digital Policy Nathaniel C. Fick led a discussion on how to better secure cyberspace and support recovery of partners that suffer a significant disruptive cyber attack.

          -  May 6, 2024							Release of United States’ International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy						   
          -  May 6, 2024							United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy						     
          -  							Building Digital Solidarity: The United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy						     
See All

Back to Top
#### § 579.313 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
# C_2005330EN.01001304.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/13

---

Removal from the register of Case C-86/05 (1)

1

(2005/C 330/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

By order of 7 September 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-86/05: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(DR)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(DR)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

MISSION AREA SUPPLEMENT -

DISASTER RELIEF

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 17
- 00473
- CR

Delfino Torres
- Vasquez, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 331ST DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 16
- 904032 , THE HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESI DIN G

O R D E R

PER CURIAM The State’s brief was originally due March 28, 2018 . On counsel’s mot ions , the time for filing was extended to June 28, 2018 . The State’s counsel has now filed a fourth motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for fili ng the State’s brief. We grant the motion for
extension of time and order the State to file a brief no later than July 30, 2018. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the case being submitted to this Court on the appellant’s brief alone.
It is ordered on July 3, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin , and Bourland
Do Not Publish
§ 1001.1501 Default of health education loan or scholarship obligations. ( a ) *Circumstance for exclusion.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the OIG may exclude any individual that the administrator of the health education loan, scholarship, or loan repayment program determines is in default on repayments of scholarship obligations or loans, or the obligations of any loan repayment program, in connection with health professions education made or secured in whole or in part by the Secretary.
( 2 ) Before imposing an exclusion in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the OIG must determine that the administrator of the health education loan, scholarship, or loan repayment program has taken all reasonable administrative steps to secure repayment of the loans or obligations. When an individual has been offered a Medicare offset arrangement as required by section 1892 of the Act, the OIG will find that all reasonable steps have been taken.
( 3 ) The OIG will take into account access of beneficiaries to physicians' services for which payment may be made under Medicare, Medicaid or other Federal health care programs in determining whether to impose an exclusion.
( 4 ) The OIG will not exclude a physician who is the sole community physician or the sole source of essential specialized services in a community if a State requests that the physician not be excluded.
( b ) *Length of exclusion.* The individual will be excluded until the administrator of the health education loan, scholarship, or loan repayment program notifies the OIG that the default has been cured or that there is no longer an outstanding debt. Upon such notice, the OIG will inform the individual of his or her right to apply for reinstatement.
[57 FR 3330, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 39427, July 22, 1999; 67 FR 11935, Mar. 18, 2002; 82 FR 4115, Jan. 12, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.111 Requirements for coverage of intensive outpatient services in CMHCs. Medicare part B covers intensive outpatient services furnished by or under arrangements made by a CMHC if they are provided by a CMHC as defined in § 410.2 that has in effect a provider agreement under part 489 of this chapter and if the services are— ( a ) Prescribed by a physician and furnished under the general supervision of a physician;
( b ) Subject to certification by a physician in accordance with § 424.24(d)(1) of this chapter; and
( c ) Furnished under a plan of treatment that meets the requirements of § 424.24(d)(2) of this chapter.
[88 FR 82179, Nov. 22, 2023]
CYTOGEN ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF JOHN E. BAGALAY, JR.
          AS INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  



PRINCETON, N.J., October 29, 1997  --  CYTOGEN Corporation
(NASDAQ:CYTO) today announced the appointment of John E. Bagalay,
Jr. as interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  Dr.
Bagalay's appointment to this position will be in addition to his
existing role as Director.

In his capacity as Chief Financial Officer, Dr. Bagalay will
oversee the financial and investment functions of the Company. 
Since September, 1989, Dr. Bagalay has served as Managing
Director of Community Technology Fund, the venture capital
affiliate of Boston University.  Dr. Bagalay has been a member of
the CYTOGEN Board of Directors since October 1995, and currently
serves on the boards of directors of Seragen, Inc., Wave Systems
Corporation and several privately-held companies in the
biotechnology industry.  Dr. Bagalay holds a B.A. in Politics,
Philosophy and Economics, a Ph.D. in Political Philosophy from
Yale University, and a J.D. from the University of Texas.

Thomas J. McKearn, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of CYTOGEN stated, "Dr. Bagalay's appointment as Chief
Financial Officer follows the departure of T.J. Madison from this
position.  Mr. Madison has left CYTOGEN and its subsidiaries
because of differences over the business strategies of the
Company and will return to pursuing interests in venture capital
and investment banking."  

CYTOGEN is a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development, 
manufacture, and commercialization of products for the targeted delivery 
of diagnostic and therapeutic substances directly to disease sites.  
CYTOGEN has demonstrated its ability to develop new technology from early 
discovery through clinical development, regulatory approval and
commercial-scale biologic manufacturing.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belmont Bancorp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilbur R. Roat, President and Chief Executive of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Wilbur R. Roat                 
|Wilbur R. Roat                     
|President & Chief Executive Officer
|                                   
|November 12, 2004
#### Davidson v. Davidson

*Robert Lee Jacobs,*for plaintiff.

June 11, 1954.

Shughart, P. J.,

The notes of testimony in the above action, and the report of. the master, disclose that defendant, John J. Davidson, was incarcerated in the Cumberland County Jail at the time notice of the hearing was given to him and was *72also thus incarcerated at the time of the hearing. Notice of the hearing was addressed to him, by registered mail, and it appears that said notice was received in his behalf by one of the officials at the county prison.

Where defendant in a.divorce action is prevented from attending a hearing by reason of the sentence of a court, every effort must be made to preserve and protect his rights: Knable v. Knable, 67 D. *&*C. 380; Mylonas v. Mylonas, 81 D. & C. 462.

Since there has been insufficient notice, this matter is referred back to the master, with directions to fix another time for hearing, notice of which hearing must not only be given to defendant but, at the same time, he must be advised that in the event he desires to appear, proper steps will be taken so that he may appear and defend the action, if he so desires.

And now, June 11, 1954, at 1:20 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time), the above matter is referred back to the master, heretofore appointed, with directions to proceed as outlined in the foregoing opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,903,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  385,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      40,608,707
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,951,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,188,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     27,423,689
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,188,885
<SALES>                                      9,429,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,536,634
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,973,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,682,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (119,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (119,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 24.8 Removal from the Service. ( a ) A member of the Service may be subject to disciplinary action, including removal from the Service, for substandard performance of duty as a member of the service, for misconduct, for reasons of national security or for other reasons as determined by the Secretary.
( b ) A member for whom disciplinary action is proposed is entitled to: ( 1 ) Written notice of the proposed action and the basis therefor;
( 2 ) A reasonable opportunity to answer the notice of proposed action both orally and in writing;
( 3 ) The right to be represented by an attorney or other representative in making such answer; and
( 4 ) A written decision on the proposal.
( c ) The decision may be made by an official with delegated authority to take such action, but in no case may the official be at a level below the head of the Operating Division where the member is assigned.
( d ) A member who is separated from the Service involuntarily and without cause and who, immediately prior to his appointment to the Service, was a career appointee in the civil service or the Senior Executive Service, may be appointed to a position in the competitive civil service at grade GS-15 of the General Schedule. Such an appointment may be made by the Secretary or his/her designee without regard to the provisions of title 5, U.S. Code regarding appointments in the civil service.
( e ) A member who is separated from the Service involuntarily and without cause and who, immediately prior to appointment to the Service, was not a career appointee in the civil service or the Senior Executive Service may be appointed to a position in the excepted civil service at grade GS-15 of the General Schedule for a period not to exceed two years.
( f ) There shall be no right to further review of the final decision on a disciplinary action. At his/her discretion, the Secretary may review an action taken under this section and may reduce, suspend, or overrule the action taken.
( g ) A member of the Service may be removed from the Service for such other reasons as may be prescribed by the Secretary.