alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.100 What are the rules for purchasing and delivering gift savings bonds to minors?

(a) A TreasuryDirect ® account owner can purchase a savings bond as a gift with a minor as the recipient.

(b) An account owner can deliver a bond purchased as a gift to a minor. The account owner must deliver the security to the minor's linked account. Once delivered, the bond will be under the control of the custodian of the minor's account. (See § 363.27.)

[70 FR 57444, Sept. 30, 2005]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51393

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS FACUNDO-MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-320-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus FacundoMaldonado raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Abrams et al. v. Lapidus

*Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul*and *James Dessen,*for plaintiffs.

*Schwartz, Campbell & Henry,*for defendant.

*67February 25, 1955.

Levinthal, J.,

In this case defendant seeks to take the depositions of plaintiff’s physician.

Defendant had earlier asked in filed interrogatories for information with respect to the nature and extent of plaintiff’s disability, the names of his physicians and the cost of the treatment. Plaintiffs filed an answer to the interrogatories and at the same time forwarded to defendant’s counsel the report of plaintiff’s physician setting forth the date of each treatment, the amount of his charges and a detailed diagnosis. Plaintiff contends that: (1) Further discovery will not substantially aid defendant in the preparation or trial of his case as required by Pa. R. C. P. 4007(a); (2) Pa. R. C. P. 4010, providing for physical and mental examination of a party on the motion of the other party sets a limit to his right to discovery in this area, and (3) the deposition asked for will cause him unreasonable annoyance and expense.

1. New things would moré substantially aid in the preparation of trial of defendant’s case than obtaining exact knowledge of the nature of plaintiff’s damages. He should be entitled therefore to take the depositions of plaintiff’s doctor. He certainly cannot be prevented from doing this by being compelled to accept whatever plaintiff seeks to give him by way of a doctor’s report, even if it includes a diagnosis and statement of treatment. This report might be incomplete, or might upon examination prove to be based upon insufficient data, or to be an otherwise incorrect diagnosis. This is the sort of discovery that Pa. R. C. P. 4007(a) intended to ■ authorize.

2. The fact that defendant has the right to a physical examination of plaintiff by a physician of defendant’s choice, under Pa. R. C. P. 4010, does not preclude' the discovery here asked for. Such examination would in many cases be unsatisfactory. The defendant’s physician may be somewhat hampered in the ques*68tions he asks. Plaintiff’s physical integrity cannot be violated, e.g., by blood tests, nor can he be subjected to any examination that will cause physical pain. Again defendant is entitled to such information as is available with respect to plaintiff’s physical condition prior to the time that the discovery is sought. It seems obvious to us that a physical examination under Pa. R. C. P. 4010 should not limit plaintiff’s right to the discovery here sought.

3. What defendant here seeks does not involve unreasonable annoyance or expense to plaintiff within the meaning of Pa. R. C. P. 4011 (6). As we have indicated above it is not duplication, but something different to which defendant has a right.

Plaintiff’s motion to vacate is discharged.
3-1 CHAPTER 3: SCREENING OF DESIGN OPTIONS

The Process Rule requires that the Department screen design options before beginning the Engineering Analysis. To be considered as the basis for the rulemaking, design options must satisfy four screening criteria :

C Must be technically feasible

C Must be practical to mass manufacture, install, and service

C Must not substantially reduce consumer utility

C Must not raise significant safety concerns

We assume that design options available in products currently offered to the mass market meet those screening criteria. The most widespread of these efficiency-related enhancements are:

C Increased coil face area and depth

C Multiple speed fan motor or blower motor

C Variable (or multiple) speed or capacity compressor or dual compressor

C Thermostatic or electronic expansion valve

C Improved air flow and fan design

C Increased efficiency compressor (scroll, advanced reciprocating)

Several recent and ongoing devel opments may soon change the cost impact of some of these

enhancements and make them more attractive to manufacturers. Each of these emerging technologies also meets the screening criteria:

C Advanced variable speed motor control (e.g. DC controllers and AC inverters)

C Advanced modulating compressors (e.g. Bristol TS ® , Copeland Modulated Scroll ® )

C Microchannel heat exchangers

We considered the impacts of these emerging technologies separately from our ARI validation

effort.

Finally, the industry currently faces a federally mandated phase out of refrigerant HCFC-22 by 2010. Although researchers continue to investigate several alternative refrigerants, only two seem likely to

achieve significant penetration: 410A and 407C. For new products, 410A is favored. Its higher operating

pressure and thermodynamic p roperties enable some reductions in component size that partially offset higher lubricant and refrigerant costs. 407C ope rates at similar pressures as HCFC-22 but at a lower efficiency. Both refrigerants pass the screening criteria. Again, we did not consider either of these within our ARI validation effort since ARI considered equipment limited to HCFC-22.
§ 3.418 Exclusivity of penalty. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by paragraph (b) of this section, a penalty imposed under this part is in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law.
( b ) Civil money penalties shall not be imposed both under this part and under the HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR parts 160 and 164).
§ 137.363 What is the procedure for the Secretary's review and approval of amendments? ( a ) The Secretary shall promptly notify the Self-Governance Tribe in writing of any concerns or issues that may lead to disapproval. The Secretary shall share relevant information and documents, and make a good faith effort to resolve all issues and concerns of the Self-Governance Tribe. If, after consultation with the Self-Governance Tribe, the Secretary intends to disapprove the proposed amendment, then the Secretary shall follow the procedures set forth in § 137.330 through 137.334.
( b ) The time allowed for Secretarial review, comment, and approval of amendments is 30 days, or within a longer time if agreed to by the Self-Governance Tribe in writing. Absence of a written response by the Secretary within 30 days shall be deemed approved.
( c ) The timeframe set forth in paragraph (b) of this section is intended to be the maximum time and may be reduced based on urgency and need, by agreement of the parties. If the Self-Governance Tribe requests reduced timeframes for action due to unusual or special conditions (such as limited construction periods), the Secretary shall make a good faith effort to accommodate the requested timeframes.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Act Amendments

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Federal Reserve Matters					 and 	Eighty-Third Congress, 1953-1955. 						*Federal Reserve Act Amendments : Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Eighty-Third Congress, Second Session, on S. 3206 and S. 3268, May 13, 1954*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										May 13, 1954,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/369,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF NORTH PALM BEACH, Appellant, v. CHEVYLAND SHOPPING CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 74-596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; John Beranek, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

######  Office of Thrift Supervision

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole Receiver for Bradford Bank, Baltimore, Maryland (OTS No. 01348), on August 28, 2009.

Dated: September 1, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-21473 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)****OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report of PaulsonCapital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Karen L. Johannes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Karen L. Johannes   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Karen L. Johannes       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Paulson Capital Corp.   |
| March 30, 2007          |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Paulson Capital Corp. and will be retainedby Paulson Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
HomeTrinidad and Tobago

# Trinidad and Tobago

83 items

        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Trinidad and Tobago (21-1230) – Extension of Status of Forces Agreement	  December 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Trinidad and Tobago	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Trinidad and Tobago’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 31, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Donation of 5.5 Million Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine to CARICOM Countries	  Ned PriceAugust 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Trinidad and Tobago	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Trinidad and Tobago	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Trinidad and Tobago	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken’s Roundtable with CARICOM Foreign Ministers	  April 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Trinidad and Tobago	  March 30, 2021 

previous page1…34567…9next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>


                     U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB/A


[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1996

[ ]      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the transition period from ________ to ________

                         Commission file number 0-13803

                            GATEWAY INDUSTRIES, INC.

        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

            Delaware                                            33-0637631
-------------------------------                             -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

      101-01 Foster Avenue
       Brooklyn, New York                                         11236
----------------------------------------                        ----------
(Address of principal executive offices)                        (Zip Code)

          Issuer's telephone number, including area code: 718-272-9700


         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                  Yes [X]  No [ ]

         Transition Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):

                  Yes [ ]  No [X]



                      APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

         State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common equity, as of the latest practicable data.

         As of September 30, 1996, the Registrant had approximately 3,603,469
shares of Common Stock outstanding.



                                        1

<PAGE>

Item 6 EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

         The Registrant hereby amends Item 6 of its Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 1996 to include as Exhibit 27, the Financial Data Schedule filed
herewith.





                                   SIGNATURES

         In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                           Gateway Industries, Inc.
                                           (Registrant)


Date: October 10, 1996                      By: /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein
      ------------------                    ---------------------------
                                            Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                            Chairman of the Board
                                            and Principal Financial
                                            and Accounting Officer
#### Albert MARTIN, Sr. v. HOLZER SHEET METAL WORKS, INC. and Argonaut Ins. Cos.

No. 64565.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 1979.

In re Albert Martin, Sr. applying for writ of certiorari, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of Orleans. 363 So.2d 544, 370 So.2d 672.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.71 Clinical psychologist services and services and supplies incident to clinical psychologist services. ( a ) *Included services.* ( 1 ) Medicare Part B covers services furnished by a clinical psychologist, who meets the requirements specified in paragraph (d) of this section, that are within the scope of his or her State license, if the services would be covered if furnished by a physician or as an incident to a physician's services.
( 2 ) Medicare Part B covers services and supplies incident to the services of a clinical psychologist if the requirements of § 410.26 are met.
( b ) *Application of mental health treatment limitation.* The treatment services of a clinical psychologist and services and supplies furnished as an incident to those services are subject to the limitation on payment for outpatient mental health treatment services set forth in § 410.155.
( c ) *Payment for consultations.* A clinical psychologist or an attending or primary care physician may not bill Medicare or the beneficiary for the consultation that is required under paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) *Qualifications.* For purposes of this subpart, a clinical psychologist is an individual who— ( 1 ) Holds a doctoral degree in psychology; and
( 2 ) Is licensed or certified, on the basis of the doctoral degree in psychology, by the State in which he or she practices, at the independent practice level of psychology to furnish diagnostic, assessment, preventive, and therapeutic services directly to individuals.
( e ) *Agreement to consult.* A clinical psychologist who bills Medicare Part B must agree to meet the requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(3) of this section. The clinical psychologist's signature on a Medicare provider/supplier enrollment form indicates his or her agreement. ( 1 ) Unless the beneficiary's primary care or attending physician has referred the beneficiary to the clinical psychologist, to inform the beneficiary that it is desirable for the clinical psychologist to consult with the beneficiary's attending or primary care physician (if the beneficiary has such a physician) to consider any conditions contributing to the beneficiary's symptoms.
( 2 ) If the beneficiary assents to the consultation, in accordance with accepted professional ethical norms and taking into consideration patient confidentiality— ( i ) To attempt, within a reasonable time after receiving the consent, to consult with the physician; and
( ii ) If attempts to consult directly with the physician are not successful, to notify the physician, within a reasonable time, that he or she is furnishing services to the beneficiary.
( 3 ) Unless the primary care or attending physician referred the beneficiary to the clinical psychologist, to document, in the beneficiary's medical record, the date the patient consented or declined consent to consultation, the date of consultation, or, if attempts to consult did not succeed, the date and manner of notification to the physician.
[63 FR 20128, Apr. 23, 1998, as amended at 78 FR 74811, Dec. 10, 2013]
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June1, 2017, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer and with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuantto Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.                  Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.                 To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton 

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### Edward L. CROKE and Carol A. Long, Petitioners, v. Isabel CRISPI, Respondent.

No. 79-2022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 31, 1979.

Richard G. Ozelie of Golding & Wagen-heim, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Certiorari is denied.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.