alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting--September 24, 2009--6:30 pm

    In connection with its investigation into the cause of a February 
7, 2008, an explosion and fire at the Imperial Sugar refinery northwest 
of Savannah, Georgia, the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board announces that it will convene a public meeting on September 24, 
2009, starting at 6:30 pm at the Hilton Savannah DeSoto--15 East 
Liberty Street, Savannah, Georgia.
    At the meeting CSB staff will present to the Board the results of 
their investigation into this incident. Key issues involved in the 
investigation concern combustible dust hazard recognition, minimizing 
combustible dust accumulation in the workplace, and equipment design 
and maintenance. This will be followed by a public comment period prior 
to a Board vote on the report.
    Incident: On February 7, 2008, at about 7:15 p.m., a series of 
sugar dust explosions at the Imperial Sugar manufacturing facility in 
Port Wentworth, Georgia, resulted in 14 worker fatalities and 36 
injuries. Eight workers died at the scene and six eventually succumbed 
to their injuries at the Augusta Burn Center. The explosions and 
subsequent fires destroyed the sugar packing buildings, palletizer 
room, and silos, and severely damaged the bulk train car loading area 
and parts of the sugar refinery.
    Following the staff presentation and the conclusion of the public 
comment period, the Board will consider whether to approve the final 
report and recommendations. All staff presentations are preliminary and 
are intended solely to allow the Board to consider in a public forum 
the issues and factors involved in this case. No factual analyses, 
conclusions or findings presented by staff should be considered final. 
Only after the Board has considered the final staff presentation, 
listened to the witnesses and the public comments and approved the 
staff report will there be an approved final record of this incident.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Please notify CSB if a 
translator or interpreter is needed, at least 5 business days prior to 
the public meeting. For more information, please contact the Chemical 
Safety and Hazard Investigation Board at (202)-261-7600, or visit our 
Web site at: www.csb.gov.

Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-21127 Filed 8-28-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
# Oman

111 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 18, 2022	  Ned PriceAugust 18, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Returns from Travel to the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Saudi Arabia	  August 17, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to the UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia	  August 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Timothy A. Lenderking  U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingAugust 4, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Omani Foreign Minister Al-Busaidi	  July 31, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Oman	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Oman	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to Sweden and Oman	  June 17, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Timothy A. Lenderking  U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingJune 7, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Oman	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10849

Conference Calendar

EDWARD OSWALT

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KELLY VANDYGRIFF; SHAWN VANDYGRIFF; ABERNATHY FIRE CHIEF;

ORIS J CECIL, Ex-Fire Marshal; SANTOS MARTINEZ; CAROLYN PURSLEY,

State Fire Marshal; JAMES L WHARTON, Attorney for Travelers Lloyds and

Hubbard Insurance Agency; DENNIS BELKNAP; CINDY RUNNELS; GARY

MORMINO & ASSOCIATES, Travelers Lloyds of Texas

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CV-103

Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Oswalt, Texas prisoner # 1421535, was convicted of arson and

sentenced to five years in prison. Oswalt appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his civil rights complaint, in which he claimed, inter alia, that the defendants

had him falsely charged with arson so that his insurance company would not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 15, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10849

2

have to pay for the fire damage to his home. Oswalt also alleged that the

defendants conspired to interfere with his civil rights, deprived him of his

constitutional right to his home, and denied him equal protection under the law.

Oswalt sought monetary damages in the amount of 16 million dollars. The

district court dismissed Oswalt’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state

a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

Oswalt has filed a one-page appellate brief with this court, asserting that

the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Oswalt has not, however,

analyzed the district court’s merit-based dismissal of his claims. Thus, Oswalt’s

claims are deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th

Cir. 1993). 

Oswalt’s brief fails to raise any issue of arguable merit. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal

as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The district court's dismissal of Oswalt’s suit

as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B) and

§ 1915A(b)(1) and this court's dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as

strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Oswalt is cautioned that if he accumulates three

strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility

unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Brian Bonar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: February 20, 2007

/s/ Brian Bonar
---------------
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1003.700 Basis for civil money penalties, assessments, and exclusions. The OIG may impose a penalty, assessment, and an exclusion against any person including an organization, agency, or other entity, but excluding a program beneficiary (as defined in § 1003.110), that, with respect to a grant, contract, or other agreement for which the Secretary provides funding: ( a ) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented a specified claim (as defined in § 1003.110) under such grant, contract, or other agreement that the person knows or should know is false or fraudulent;
( b ) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, any false statement, omission, or misrepresentation of a material fact in any application, proposal, bid, progress report, or other document that is required to be submitted in order to directly or indirectly receive or retain funds provided in whole or in part by such Secretary pursuant to such grant, contract, or other agreement;
( c ) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent specified claim under such grant, contract, or other agreement;
( d ) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation (as defined in § 1003.110) to pay or transmit funds or property to such Secretary with respect to such grant, contract, or other agreement, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit funds or property to such Secretary with respect to such grant, contract, or other agreement; or
( e ) Fails to grant timely access (as defined in § 1003.200(b)(10)), upon reasonable request (as defined in § 1003.110), to the Inspector General of the Department, for the purpose of audits, investigations, evaluations, or other statutory functions of such Inspector General in matters involving such grants, contracts, or other agreements.
§ 35.49 Sale of unclaimed effects; procedures. The following provisions shall govern the sale of effects: ( a ) *Notice.* Reasonable advance notice of proposed sales shall be posted at such prominent places in the station or hospital area as the officer in charge may designate. In addition, a notice shall be posted at the nearest post office, and notices shall be sent by mail to all known persons to whom delivery of money and effects of the patient may be made under the provisions of this subpart. The officer or employee who posts or sends notices of sales shall make an appropriate affidavit on a copy of the notice as to his action in that respect, including in his affidavit the names of persons to whom copies of the notices were mailed and the mailing dates. The copy of the notice on which the affidavit appears shall be retained in the files of the station or hospital.
( b ) *Form and contents of notice.* Notice of proposed sales shall be given on a form prescribed by the Surgeon General. The notice shall include: an inventory of the effects to be offered for sale; the names of the patients from whom the effects were received; the precise date, time, and place when and where the sale will be held; a statement that the articles will be available for inspection immediately prior to sale, if sold at public auction, or on a day and during the hours appointed for the inspection of articles if sold by sealed bid; a statement that the sale is to be held pursuant to the provisions of the regulations in this part, that, if the articles are to be sold by sealed bid, the right to reject all bids is reserved, and that, if otherwise authorized, delivery will be made of effects or proceeds of sales to persons filing claims prior to the sale of effects or prior to the transmittal of proceeds to the Surgeon General.
( c ) *Time and place of sales.* All sales shall be held at reasonable hours and at such places within the station or hospital area as the officer in charge may designate.
( d ) *Who shall conduct sales.* All sales shall be conducted by the officer in charge or by a responsible officer or employee designated by him.
( e ) *Sale and delivery.* All effects offered for sale shall be sold to the highest bidder and delivered to him immediately upon payment of the sale price in cash or by postal money order or certified check and execution of an appropriate receipt by the person to whom delivery is made.
* P ursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 97-30868 Summary Calendar

____________________ LILLIE M SHELBY

Plaintiff - Appellant

v. JON A GEGENHEIMER, in capacity as Clerk of Court for the Parish of Jefferson; ET AL

Defendants JON A GEGENHEIMER, in capacity as Clerk of Court for the Parish of Jefferson

Defendant - Appellee

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1164)

_________________________________________________________________ April 7, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff-appellant Lillie M. Shelby appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant-a ppellee, Jon A. Gegenheimer, in his capacity as Clerk of Court for JeffersonParish. The district court provided a full statement of its

reasons for the decision in its Order and Reasons. Each of the
arguments made on a ppeal by appellant is addressed and correctly disposed of by the district court in its Order and Reasons. We
therefore affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district

court.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2005253EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 October 2005

(2005/C 253/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2008 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4627 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3507 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5478 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 73,59 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9560 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5731 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,566 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8845 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5880 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,840 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6307 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5927 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4079 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3167 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7300 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0315 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8740 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7139 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3838 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 140,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,530 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,035 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,175 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2008

JPY

Japanese yen

137,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4627

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3507

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5478

ISK

Iceland króna

73,59

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9560

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5731

CZK

Czech koruna

29,566

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8845

RON

Romanian leu

3,5880

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,840

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6307

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5927

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4079

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3167

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7300

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0315

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,25

ZAR

South African rand

7,8740

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7139

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3838

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 140,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,530

PHP

Philippine peso

67,035

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3360

THB

Thai baht

49,175

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006025EN.01000801.xml

| 1.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3642 — Carlyle/Advent/HT Troplast JV)

(2006/C 25/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3642. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3642. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
### Marine geological and geophysical investigations of the Antarctic continental margin, 1984

By: Stephen L. EittreimAlan K. Cooperand others

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir935

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Mason T. PRUNER, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE CO., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 81-1000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 4, 1981.

George R. McLain of Harnden, McClain, Spivey & Dart, Sarasota, for appellant.

Jeffrey R. Fuller of Williams, Brasfield & Wertz, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended final judgment entered by the trial court finding that insurance coverage is not afforded to Charles D. Rollings, III, for the intentional assault and battery committed by him upon the appellant, Mason T. Pruner.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
- Office Home
- Remarks and Releases
#### § 550.509 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2922

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to ensure that Federal funds made available to hire or

rehire law enforcement officers are used in a manner that produces

a net gain of the number of law enforcement officers who perform

nonadministrative public safety services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1996

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to ensure that Federal

funds made available to hire or rehire law enforcement

officers are used in a manner that produces a net gain

of the number of law enforcement officers who perform

nonadministrative public safety services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NET GAIN OF OFFICERS.

4 Section 1704 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

5 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at

6 the end the following:
2

•HR 2922 IH

1 ‘‘(d) NET GAIN OF OFFICERS.—Notwithstanding any

2 other provision under this part, funding provided under

3 this part for hiring or rehiring a career law enforcement

4 officer shall be used by an entity described in section

5 1701(a) to ensure that such entity achieves a net gain in

6 the number of law enforcement officers who perform

7 nonadministrative public safety service.’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to all

10 applications and grant renewal requests made on or after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 137.146 If the Secretary rejects all or part of a final offer, is the Indian Tribe entitled to an appeal?

Yes, the Indian Tribe is entitled to appeal the decision of the Secretary, with an agency hearing on the record, and the right to engage in full discovery relevant to any issue raised in the matter. The procedures for appeals are found in subpart P of this part. Alternatively, at its option, the Indian Tribe has the right to sue pursuant to section 110 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450m-1] in Federal district court to challenge the Secretary's decision.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CASE NO. DA23-0713

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MATTHEW THOMAS BASQUE,

Petitioner/Appellant

 and

GINA ALICIA BASQUE,

Respondent/Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

THE COURT having reviewed Appellant’s Motion for Extension and for

good cause appearing therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s Motion is GRANTED and

Appellant shall file his Opening Brief no later than April 22, 2024.

Dated this _____ day of March, 2024.

 ________________________________

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2024

03/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0713
# Samoa

44 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Samoa	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  June 21, 2019 
        -    		Samoa	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Samoa	  June 29, 2017 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top