alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeZambia

# Zambia

78 items

        -    Media Note  		PEPFAR Launches Nursing Leadership Initiative Across Seven African Countries	  March 24, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Zambia and South Africa	  March 6, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Lusaka, Zambia: American International School of Lusaka: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S., Zambia, AFC Host PGI Forum to Strengthen Investment in Lobito Corridor	  February 8, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Marrakesh Co-Chairs’ Summary	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on Lobito Corridor MoU Signing	  Helaina R. MatzaOctober 31, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Zambia	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Signing of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Development of the Lobito Corridor and the Zambia-Lobito Rail Line	  October 26, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Zambia Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 24, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALKING MOUNTAIN PRODUCTIONS, a California business entity; Tom Forsythe, an individual dba Walking Mountain Productions, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-56733.

D.C. No. CV-99-08543-RSWL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 15, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

This appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our inquiry is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the preliminary injunction or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. *Does 1-5 v. Chandler,*83 F.3d 1150, 1152 (9th Cir.1996).

The record before us shows that the district court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that Mattel, Inc. failed to make a showing of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury. *See id.; see also Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, Inc.,*686 F.2d 750, 753 (9th Cir.1982) (stating legal standards governing issuance of preliminary injunction). Moreover, the court’s factual findings are not clearly erroneous. *See Chandler,*83 F.3d at 1152.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 10.40

SEVENTH AMENDMENT TOGUARANTY AGREEMENT 

        ThisSeventh Amendment to Guaranty Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of this27th day of January, 2003 by and among ASCENT ASSURANCE, INC. (the “Guarantor”),and LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (the “Bank”). 

W I T N E S S E T H 

        WHEREAS,the Guarantor delivered a Guaranty Agreement in favor of the Bank, dated as of June 6,1997, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March24, 1999, as further amended by that certain Second Amendment to Guaranty Agreement, datedas of July 21, 1999, as further amended by that certain Third Amendment to GuarantyAgreement, dated as of April 17, 2000, as further amended by that certain Fourth Amendmentto Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 10, 2000, as further amended by that certainFifth Amendment to Guaranty Agreement made as of November 30, 2000, to be effective as ofSeptember 30, 2000, and as further amended by that certain Sixth Amendment to GuarantyAgreement dated as of April 17, 2001 (collectively, the “Guaranty Agreement”); 

        WHEREAS,the Guarantor delivered the Guaranty pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement, dated asof June 6, 1997 between Ascent Funding, Inc. (formerly Westbridge Funding Corporation) andthe Bank (the “Credit Agreement”); and 

        WHEREAS,the parties hereto desire to further amend the Guaranty, subject to the terms andconditions contained herein. 

        NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained and other good andvaluable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and subject to theterms and conditions hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

        SECTION 1.    **DEFINITIONS.**  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meaning given to themin the Guaranty.

        SECTION 2.    **AMENDMENTS TO GUARANTY AGREEMENT.**
#### Cleveland G. STANARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Russell McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Oman

111 items

        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Oman	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation With Oman	  June 15, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking Returns from Travel to Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, and Jordan	  June 4, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to Saudi Arabia and Oman	  May 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Oman	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy Lenderking Returns from Travel to Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Jordan	  May 7, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to Saudi Arabia and Oman	  April 28, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy Lenderking’s Trip to Saudi Arabia and Oman	  March 31, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Oman	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 26, 2021Washington, D.C.  

previous page1…678910…12next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors of Trans Financial, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
33-40606,   33-60844,   33-56761,  33-64601  and  333-06089  on  Form  S-3,  and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-21517,  33-43046,  33-53960,  33-72492, 33-65347,
33-65349 and 333-18359 on Form S-8 of Trans Financial,  Inc. of our report dated
January  20,  1997,  relating  to  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Trans
Financial,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1996 and 1995 and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1996,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of Trans Financial, Inc.
     Our report  refers to a change in the  method of  accounting  for  mortgage
servicing rights in 1995.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Louisville, Kentucky
February 28, 1997
#### § 598.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise specified, reference to any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, direction, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
§ 136.107 Use of project funds. ( a ) A grantee shall only spend funds it receives under this subpart according to the approved application and budget, the regulations of this subpart, the terms and conditions of the award and the applicable cost principles prescribed in 45 CFR part 75, subpart E.
( b ) The provisions of any other Act notwithstanding, any funds made available to a tribal organization under grants pursuant to section 104(b) of the Act may be used as matching shares for any other Federal grant programs which contribute to the purposes for which grants under this section are made.
Note:
This provision is excepted from application of 45 CFR 75.306 by section 104(c) of Pub. L. 93-638.
[40 FR 53143, Nov. 14, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 1854, Jan. 14, 1985; 81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
HomeBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsRemarks & Releases...Cuba Internet Task Force

# 									Cuba Internet Task Force							

Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

As directed in the June 16, 2017, National Security Presidential Memorandum “Strengthening the Policy of the United States Toward Cuba,” the Department of State created the Cuba Internet Task Force (CITF) to examine the technological challenges and opportunities for expanding Internet access and freedom of expression in Cuba.

The CITF is comprised of representatives from relevant departments and agencies of the U.S. government and Internet-related non-governmental organizations and private-sector entities.

### Documents

Cuba Internet Task Force Final Report, June 16, 2019Cuba Internet Task Force Charter, December 4, 2017Membership Balance Plan, November 11, 2017

### Public Meetings

##### December 6, 2018 Public Meeting

Federal Register Notice  Meeting readoutMeeting documents

The CITF hosted a second public meeting on Thursday, December 6, 2018, at the Harry S. Truman Building, 2201 C Street NW, Washington DC.

During the inaugural meeting in February, the Task Force created two subcommittees to explore challenges and opportunities for expanding internet access in Cuba. The December 6 meeting provided an opportunity to discuss the subcommittees’ findings and recommendations.

##### February 7, 2018 Inaugural Meeting

Meeting readoutMeeting documents

The inaugural meeting was held February 7, 2018, at the Harry S. Truman Building, 2201 C Street NW, Washington, DC. Notice  of the CITF’s inaugural meeting was published January 22, 2018, in the Federal Register and announced by the Department.

During the inaugural meeting, the Task Force agreed to form two subcommittees, one to explore the role of media and the free and unregulated flow of information in Cuba, and one to explore Internet access in Cuba. The subcommittees will provide the Task Force a preliminary report of recommendations within six months based on input from relevant experts and stakeholders. The Task Force agreed to reconvene in October 2018 to review the preliminary reports, after which it will prepare a final report with recommendations for the Secretary of State and the President.

Those interested in being considered for participation on a subcommittee should email CubaITF@state.gov with an explanation of their relevant experience and interest.

### Public Comment

Members of the public may submit written comments to the Task Force via email. Comments may be published at the discretion of the Task Force. Please do not include any private or personal information in your comment. The CITF will not respond directly to comments, but will consider all relevant comments in its work.

Provide Comment to the Cuba Internet Task Force

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCubaInternet Freedom

Back to Top
#### UNIFRAME INDUSTRIES, a Florida corporation, and Raymond Miller, Appellants, v. SOUTHERN DOOR COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 17, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               





| | /s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | C. Jayson Brentlinger 
Chief Executive Officer
Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
November 14, 2007
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, Debra Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of VICORPRestaurants, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of VICORP Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 

 
|   | Date: February 1, 2006 | /s/ Debra Koenig |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|------------------|--------|
|   | Debra Koenig                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
HomeKenya

# Kenya

202 items

        -    DSS Articles  		Women in Law Enforcement Make Up a Growing Part of Antiterrorism Assistance Program	  March 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to Mozambique, Ethiopia, and Kenya	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with President Ruto	  March 13, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for Sudan Perriello Travels to Uganda, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Kenya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kenyan President Ruto	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator Richard’s Travel to Kenya	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Nairobi, Kenya: International School of Kenya: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on U.S. Environmental Efforts on the African Continent	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnFebruary 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY23 J/IRF Combating Religious Discrimination in Kenya	  February 14, 2024 

123…21next page

Back to Top
#### Thomas H. PINE et ux. v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

No. 51165.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 6, 1979.

Guy, Dowdy & Whittington, William S. Guy, McComb, for appellant.

Statham, Watkins, Starrett & Mitchell, William F. Watkins, Magnolia, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
§ 110.2 Summary of available benefits. ( a ) The Act authorizes three forms of benefits to, or on behalf of, requesters determined to be eligible by the Secretary: ( 1 ) Payment or reimbursement for reasonable and necessary medical services and items to diagnose or treat a covered injury, or to diagnose, treat, or prevent its health complications, as described in § 110.31.
( 2 ) Lost employment income incurred as a result of a covered injury, as described in § 110.32.
( 3 ) Death benefits to certain survivors if the Secretary determines that the death of the injured countermeasure recipient was the direct result of a covered injury, as described in § 110.33.
( b ) In general, the benefits paid under the Program, are secondary to any obligation of any third-party payer to provide or pay for such benefits. The benefits available under the CICP usually will be paid only after the requester has in good faith attempted to obtain all other available coverage from all third-party payers with an obligation to pay for or provide such benefits (*e.g.,* medical insurance for medical services or items, workers' compensation program(s) for lost employment income). However, as provided in § 110.84, the Secretary has the discretion to pay benefits under this Program before a potential third-party payer makes a determination on the availability of similar benefits and has the right to later pursue a claim against any third-party payer with a legal or contractual obligation to pay for, or provide, such benefits.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Verma’s Travel to the People’s Republic of China and the Philippines

# 									Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Verma’s Travel to the People’s Republic of China and the Philippines							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 3, 2024

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma will travel to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Philippines May 6-10.

In the PRC, Deputy Secretary Verma will visit the U.S. Embassy in Beijing and the U.S. Consulates General in Shenyang, Shanghai, and Guangzhou to thank personnel and ensure that their teams have the right equipment and facilities to most effectively serve U.S. interests.  The Deputy Secretary will also meet with members of the U.S. business community in Shanghai to advocate for a level playing field for U.S. workers and firms operating in China.

In the Philippines, Deputy Secretary Verma will meet with senior government officials to build on the progress made during the annual U.S.-Philippines Bilateral Strategic Dialogue on April 22-23, the bilateral meeting between President Marcos and President Biden, the historic Japan-Philippines-U.S. Trilateral Leaders’ Summit on April 11, and the U.S.-Philippines 3+3 Ministerial on April 12.  The Deputy Secretary will also participate in a wreath laying ceremony at the Manila American Cemetery and Memorial and host a dinner with Philippine U.S. Exchange Program alumni.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBusinessChinaDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPhilippines

Back to Top
§ 137.341 How will a Self-Governance Tribe receive payment under a construction project agreement? ( a ) For all construction project agreements, advance payments shall be made annually or semiannually, at the Self-Governance Tribe's option. The initial payment shall include all contingency funding for the project or phase of the project to the extent that there are funds appropriated for that purpose.
( b ) The amount of subsequent payments is based on the mutually agreeable project schedule reflecting: ( 1 ) Work to be accomplished within the advance payment period,
( 2 ) Work already accomplished, and
( 3 ) Total prior payments for each annual or semiannual advance payment period.
( c ) For lump sum, fixed price agreements, at the request of the Self-Governance Tribe, payments shall be based on an advance payment period measured as follows: ( 1 ) One year; or
( 2 ) Project Phase(e.g., planning, , design, construction.) If project phase is chosen as the payment period, the full amount of funds necessary to perform the work for that phase of the construction project agreement is payable in the initial advance payment. For multi-phase projects, the planning and design phases must be completed prior to the transfer of funds for the associated construction phase. The completion of the planning and design phases will include at least one opportunity for Secretarial approval in accordance with § 137.360.
( d ) For the purposes of payment, Sanitation Facilities Construction Projects authorized pursuant to Pub. L. 86-121, are considered to be a single construction phase and are payable in a single lump sum advance payment in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
( e ) For all other construction project agreements, the amount of advance payments shall include the funds necessary to perform the work identified in the advance payment period of one year.
( f ) Any agreement to advance funds under paragraphs (b), (c) or (d) of this section is subject to the availability of appropriations.
( g ) ( 1 ) Initial advance payments are due within 10 days of the effective date of the construction project agreement; and
( 2 ) subsequent payments are due: ( i ) Within 10 days of apportionment for annual payments or
( ii ) Within 10 days of the start date of the project phase for phase payments.