alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005217EN.01001802.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-142/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias in Maria Aslanidou v Ypourgos Ygeias & Pronoias (1)

1

(Directive 92/51/EEC - Workers - Recognition of diplomas - Occupational therapist)

(2005/C 217/35)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-142/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece), made by decision of 30 December 2003, received at the Court on 17 March 2004, in the proceedings between Maria Aslanidou and Ypourgos Ygeias & Pronoias — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it ruled:

Where national measures transposing Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC have not been adopted within the period prescribed in Article 17 thereof, a national of a Member State may rely on Article 3(a) of that directive in order to obtain, in the host Member State, authorisation to pursue a regulated profession such as that of occupational therapist.

That possibility may not be made dependent on official recognition of the qualifications of the person concerned by the competent national authorities.

The compensatory measures referred to in Article 4(1) of Directive 92/51 may be imposed on the person concerned only in so far as they are provided for in the national legislation in force at the time of processing the application in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
#### Robbins *v.*State.

4666

244 S. W. 2d 156

Opinion delivered December 17, 1951.

*Gordon B. Carlton*and *M. M. Martin,*for appellant.

*Ike Murry,*Attorney General, and *George E. Lusk, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Geieein Smith, Chief Justice.

The appeal questions the penalty assessed for selling liquor in dry territory. The indictment charged that Jack Robbins sold a pint of Hill & Hill liquor “in a prohibited territory, Polk county,” etc. The jury’s verdict of guilty assessed a fine of $500 with six months in jail, but recommended *665that the jail sentence be suspended. The trial court did not think justification had been shown for leniency and assessed both fine and imprisonment. The motion for a new trial alleges that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence.

Appellant’s contention is that effect of the verdict and judgment was to treat the proceedings as having been brought under § 48-912, Ark. Stat’s, whereas the wording of the indictment and instructions make it clear that the intent was to proceed under § 48-803, Ark. Stat’s, this being Initiated Act No. 1 of 1942, p. 998 of the Acts of 1943. The measure was discussed in *Robbins*v. *State,*242 S. W. 2d 640, *ante,*p. 376. The appellant was the appellant in the cited case.

We are of the view that error is apparent on the face of the record, agreeing with counsel for the appellant that the Initiated Act provides the remedy intended by the electors to apply in the circumstances of this case —this for the reason that some of the language of the indictment is identical with wording in the Initiated Measure. For this reason the judgment will be modified through avoidance of the jail sentence, but affirmed as to the fine. It is so ordered.
§ 403.914 Preemption of State laws. ( a ) *General rule.* In the case of a payment or other transfer of value provided by an applicable manufacturer to a covered recipient, this subpart preempts any statute or regulation of a State or political subdivision of a State that requires an applicable manufacturer to disclose or report, in any format, the type of information regarding the payment or other transfer of value required to be reported under this subpart.
( b ) *Information collected for public health purposes.* ( 1 ) Information required to be reported to a Federal, State, or local governmental agency for public health surveillance, investigation, or other public health purposes or health oversight purposes must still be reported to appropriate Federal, State, or local governmental agencies, regardless of whether the same information is required to be reported under this subpart.
( 2 ) Governmental agencies include, but are not limited to, the following: ( i ) Agencies that are charged with preventing or controlling disease, injury, disability.
( ii ) Agencies that conduct oversight activities authorized by law, including audits, investigations, inspections, licensure or disciplinary actions, or other activities necessary for oversight of the health care system.
§ 403.206 General standards for Medicare supplemental policies. ( a ) For purposes of the voluntary certification program described in this subpart, a policy must meet— ( 1 ) The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) model standards as defined in § 405.210; and
( 2 ) The loss ratio standards specified in § 403.215.
( b ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, the standards specified in paragraph (a) of this section must be met in a single policy.
( c ) In the case of a nonprofit hospital or a medical association where State law prohibits the inclusion of all benefits in a single policy, the standards specified in paragraph (a) of the section must be met in two or more policies issued in conjunction with one another.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Steven W. King, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




By:
/s/ STEVEN W. KINGName:
Steven W. KingTitle:
President & Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorDate:
July 14, 2010






I, Paul J. Lytle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




By:
/s/ PAUL J. LYTLEName:
Paul J. LytleTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
July 14, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
HomeKyrgyzstan

# Kyrgyzstan

96 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Welcomes the Kyrgyz Republic’s Continued Repatriation of its Nationals	  Matthew MillerDecember 8, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Anti-Corruption Champions Award Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 7, 2023Burns AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote  		Recognizing the 2023 Anti-Corruption Champions  	  Todd D.  RobinsonDecember 7, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 2 of 2	  December 6, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kyrgyz Republic	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the D-ISIS FTF Working Group	  Ian MossOctober 26, 2023Istanbul, Türkiye 
        -    		One New Assisted School in 2023-2024	  October 25, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Applauds the Kyrgyz Republic’s Repatriation of its Nationals from Northeast Syria	  Matthew MillerOctober 24, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Bishkek International School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 3, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
Order entered June 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 00579 - CR DEMARCUS TYSON AKA ALFONZO DAVIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. F07 - 49621 - R



### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. We O RDER the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file, within seven days of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 103.001, .006 (West 2006). The supplemental clerk’s record SHALL ALSO INCLUDE an explanation of any abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed att orney fee. /s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
§ 136.333 Distribution of scholarships. The Secretary, acting through the Service, shall determine the distribution of Indian Health Scholarships among the health professions based upon the relative needs of Indians for additional service in specific health professions. In making that determination the needs of the Service will be given priority consideration. The following factors will also be considered: ( a ) The professional goals of recipients of scholarships under section 103 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act; and
( b ) The professional areas of study of Indian applicants.
#### § 137.306 How are Self-Governance Tribes recognized as having lead, cooperating, or joint lead agency status?

Self-Governance Tribes may be recognized as having lead, cooperating, or joint lead agency status through funding or other agreements with other agencies. To the extent that resources are available, the Secretary will encourage and facilitate Federal, state, and local agencies to enter into agreements designating Tribes as lead, cooperating, or joint lead agencies for environmental review purposes.
§ 2.32 Notice and copy of consent to accompany disclosure. ( a ) Each disclosure made with the patient's written consent must be accompanied by one of the following written statements (*i.e.,* paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section): ( 1 ) *Statement 1.* This record which has been disclosed to you is protected by Federal confidentiality rules (42 CFR part 2). These rules prohibit you from using or disclosing this record, or testimony that describes the information contained in this record, in any civil, criminal, administrative, or legislative proceedings by any Federal, State, or local authority, against the patient, unless authorized by the consent of the patient, except as provided at 42 CFR 2.12(c)(5) or as authorized by a court in accordance with 42 CFR 2.64 or 2.65. In addition, the Federal rules prohibit you from making any other use or disclosure of this record unless at least one of the following applies: ( i ) Further use or disclosure is expressly permitted by the written consent of the individual whose information is being disclosed in this record or as otherwise permitted by 42 CFR part 2.
( ii ) You are a covered entity or business associate and have received the record for treatment, payment, or health care operations, or
( iii ) You have received the record from a covered entity or business associate as permitted by 45 CFR part 164, subparts A and E. A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is NOT sufficient to meet the required elements of written consent to further use or redisclose the record (see 42 CFR 2.31).
( 2 ) *Statement 2.* “42 CFR part 2 prohibits unauthorized use or disclosure of these records.”
( b ) Each disclosure made with the patient's written consent must be accompanied by a copy of the consent or a clear explanation of the scope of the consent provided.
[89 FR 12626, Feb. 16, 2024]
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIII1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pennsylvania19103-2029MAR152012HonorableRobertM.Summers,SecretaryMarylandDepartmentoftheEnvironment1800WashingtonBoulevardBaltimore,Maryland21230DearSecretarySummers:OnFebruary29,2012,theMarylandDepartmentoftheEnvironment(MDE)providedalettertotheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)officiallywithdrawingportionsofaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)revisionsubmittedbyMDEonJune6,2008.Thesubmittalpertainedtothe1997FineParticulateMatter(PM25)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandard(NAAQS)attainmentplanfortheMartinsburg-Hagerstown,WestVirginia-Maryland(WashingtonCounty)nonattainmentarea.MDErequestedwithdrawaloftheattainmentplan,includinganalysisofreasonablyavailablecontrolmeasures,attainmentdemonstration,contingencyplansforfailuretoattain,andmobilesourcebudgets.ToaddresstherequirementsofCleanAirActsection172(c)(3),MDEisnotrequestingwithdrawaloftheportionofthesubmittalcomprisedofthe2002baseyearemissionsinventory.Asrequested,EPAisreturningtheJune6,2008submittal,withtheexceptionof-thefollowingportionsofthesubmittalrelatedtothe2002baseyearinventory:1.Chapter3oftheAttainmentPlan(The2002BaseYearInventory)2.AppendixA(BaseYear2002EmissionsInventoryandDocumentation),and3.Thepublicnoticeandhearingdocuments.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasefeelfreetocallMs.CristinaFernandez,AssociateDirector,OfficeofAirProgramPlanningat(215)814-2178.Sincerely,DianaEsher,DirectorAirProtectionDivisionEnclosurecc:George(Tad)S.Aburn,Jr.,MDE0Printedon100%recycled/recyclablepaperwith100%post-consumerfiberandprocesschlorinefree.CustomerServiceHotline:1-800-438-2474
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6931

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RUSSELL LEE EBERSOLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:03-cr-00112-LMB; 1:06-cv-00869-LMB)

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 29, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Lee Ebersole, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas H. McQuillan,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Russell Lee Ebersole seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ebersole has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2395
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (41)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (41)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (41)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
#### § 401.301 Basis and scope.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures for reporting and returning overpayments to the Medicare program for providers and suppliers of services under Parts A and B of title XVIII of the Act as required by section 1128J(d) of the Act.
HomeCountries & Areas…Niue

# Niue

		Subscribe		                  -  Embassies & Consulates 
                  -  Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs 

## International Travel Information

What you need to know before you go: visas, Embassy & Consulate locations, vaccinations, etc.
International Travel Information: Learn More

###  Current Travel Advisories

Level 1: Exercise Normal Precautions
Learn More

## Discover More

2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

2022 Report on International Religious Freedom

2023 Trafficking in Persons Report

View all Department Reports and Publications

## Highlights

September 29, 2023
Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania

September 25, 2023
Secretary Antony J. Blinken  At a Joint Statement Signing Ceremony with Niue Premier Dalton Tagelagi

September 25, 2023
On the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations Between the United States and Niue

February 16, 2021
DRL – Promoting Investigative Journalism and Anti-Corruption Efforts in Pacific Island Countries

Biological Weapons Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instruments; Niue and Central African Republic, New Zealand Niue declaration, December 23, 2019

							VIEW ALL NEWS						

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsNiue

Back to Top
HomeTanzania

# Tanzania

100 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken at a Commemoration for the 25th Anniversary of the U.S. Embassy Bombings in Tanzania and Kenya	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023National Museum of American DiplomacyWashington, D.C. 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Deliver Remarks at the Commemoration of the 25th Anniversary of the U.S. Embassy Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania	  August 4, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States Launches a Regional Summit for the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs in East Africa	  July 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Kenya, Tanzania, Nigeria, South Africa, Egypt, Tunisia, and Türkiye	  July 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Tanzania 	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Tanzania	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tanzania	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Tanzania Union Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tanzania	  March 20, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
HomeMalta

# Malta

65 items

        -    TIAS  		Malta (08-110) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances by Sea	  January 10, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Malta (07-1219) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Their Delivery Systems, and Related Materials by Sea	  December 19, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Malta (13144) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Customs Administrations	  March 6, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Malta (13120) – Air Transport Agreement	  October 12, 2000 
        -    		Malta (12841) – Agreement on Reciprocal Exemption from Taxes on Earnings Derived from the Operation of Ships and Aircraft	  March 11, 1997 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
#### § 582.508 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are otherwise prohibited by this part or any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13851 of November 27, 2018 are authorized.
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Consolidation of USIA Into The State Department: An Assessment After One Year (2000)

# 									Consolidation of USIA Into The State Department: An Assessment After One Year (2000)							

ACPD Special Report

October 1, 2000

Download Report						 [154 KB]

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top