alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

    (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.


Date: November 18, 2004


/s/ Robert W. McMartin
-------------------------
Robert W. McMartin
Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 2.16 Security for records and notification of breaches. ( a ) The part 2 program or other lawful holder of patient identifying information must have in place formal policies and procedures to reasonably protect against unauthorized uses and disclosures of patient identifying information and to protect against reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to the security of patient identifying information. ( 1 ) *Requirements for formal policies and procedures.* These policies and procedures must address all of the following: ( i ) Paper records, including: ( A ) Transferring and removing such records;
( B ) Destroying such records, including sanitizing the hard copy media associated with the paper printouts, to render the patient identifying information non-retrievable;
( C ) Maintaining such records in a secure room, locked file cabinet, safe, or other similar container, or storage facility when not in use;
( D ) Using and accessing workstations, secure rooms, locked file cabinets, safes, or other similar containers, and storage facilities that use or store such information; and
( E ) Rendering patient identifying information de-identified in accordance with the requirements of 45 CFR 164.514(b) such that there is no reasonable basis to believe that the information can be used to identify a particular patient.
( ii ) Electronic records, including: ( A ) Creating, receiving, maintaining, and transmitting such records;
( B ) Destroying such records, including sanitizing the electronic media on which such records are stored, to render the patient identifying information non-retrievable;
( C ) Using and accessing electronic records or other electronic media containing patient identifying information; and
( D ) Rendering the patient identifying information de-identified in accordance with the requirements of 45 CFR 164.514(b) such that there is no reasonable basis to believe that the information can be used to identify a patient.
( 2 ) *Exception for certain lawful holders.* Family, friends, and other informal caregivers who are lawful holders as defined in this part are not required to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) The provisions of 45 CFR part 160 and subpart D of 45 CFR part 164 shall apply to part 2 programs with respect to breaches of unsecured records in the same manner as those provisions apply to a covered entity with respect to breaches of unsecured protected health information.
[89 FR 12622, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 900.7 Required administrative proceedings.

Agencies are not required to omit, foreclose, or duplicate administrative proceedings required by contract or other laws or regulations.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2006.



/s/ Robert W. McMartin

Robert W. McMartin

Chief Financial Officer
#### Man ROBSON, Appellant, v. Evelyn BETHEL, Appellee.

No. 78-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1979.

T. Minton Baughman, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Barry J. Stone and Michael N. Gomes, Pompano Beach, for appellee.

*633PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary-judgment. The appellee brought an action for ejectment based upon a deed executed by the appellant. In response the appellant claimed, among other things, that he could not read or write; that although he may have executed a deed to the appellee, he did so upon appellee’s specific oral assurance that the deed contained a provision for him to live on the property the remainder of his life; and that appellant had been continuously residing on the property since 1930. If proven, appellant’s allegations would constitute a valid defense to the claim of appel-lee. *Collins v. McKelvain,*189 So. 655 (Fla.1939). In an affidavit filed in support of her motion for summary judgment the ap-pellee established her legal claim to the property by the deed executed by appellant, who had affixed his signature by an “X.” However, the appellee failed to negate the affirmative defense of the appellant as to the agreement that he retain a life estate. Under these circumstances we believe it was error to enter summary judgment. Accordingly, the final summary judgment is reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ANSTEAD, J., and CROSS, SPENCER C., Associate Judge, concur.

BERANEK, J., dissents with opinion.

BERANEK, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. In this ejectment action the plaintiff/appellee filed an affidavit and attached the warranty deed between the parties which had been properly recorded. In my view the plaintiff’s affidavit and the deed negated the existence of any issue of fact as to an agreement that appellant retained a life estate in the subject property. Appellant did not file an affidavit opposing the motion for summary judgment. Under these circumstances I conclude that the movant for summary judgment satisfied the initial burden of demonstrating the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact. Under the circumstances, the appellant failed to come forward with counter evidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue. As was most recently stated by the Florida Supreme Court in *Landers v. Milton,*370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979), “It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue does exist.” I would, therefore, affirm the summary judgment below.
#### § 555.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures, and other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. (the Company), on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ken L. Joines, Vice President, Treasurer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Ken L. JoinesKen L. Joines
Vice President, Treasurer and Acting Chief
Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, filed pursuant to Section
      13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of Security
      Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Connie Woods Hawkins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








BY  /s/
                Connie Woods HawkinsName:  Connie
                Woods HawkinsTitle:  Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:  August
                8, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of
      this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital
      Corporation and will be retained
      by Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 11

                           Aquila Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
                  Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                           For the Years Ended December 31,



                                    1998                 1997          1996
                                    ____                 ____          ____
Basic
____

Net income/(loss) for basic
   earnings per common shares   $ (14,599,635)      $  925,516      $5,959,530
Weighted average number of        ============         =======       =========
   common shares Outstanding
   during the year                  6,580,602        5,003,703       3,717,441
Weighted average number of
   shares used in calculation       _________        _________       _________
   Of basic earnings per share      6,580,602        5,003,703       3,717,441
                                    =========        =========       =========
Basic earnings per share       $        (2.22)   $        0.18   $        1.60
                                    =========        =========       =========



Diluted
_______

Net income/(loss) for diluted
   earnings per common share   $  (14,599,635)      $  925,516      $5,959,530
Weighted average number of
   shares used in calculating
   Basic earnings per common
     share                          6,580,602        5,003,703       3,717,441
   Add - common stock equivalents
     (determined using The
     "treasury stock" method)
     representing shares Deemed
     outstanding from the assumed
     exercise of Stock options
     reduced by the number of
     shares Purchased with the
     proceeds (determined using
     average Market price each of
     the four quarters during the
     year)                                  0          138,112               0
Weighted average number of shares
    used in calculation of               
    Diluted earnings                _________        _________       _________
    per share                       6,580,602        5,141,815       3,717,441
                                    =========        =========       =========
Diluted earnings per share          $   (2.22)       $    0.18       $    1.60
                                    =========        =========       =========
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER08-1113-004; ER08-1113-005]

      ( print page 44842)    
On August 20, 2009, the Commission convened a staff technical conference in the above-captioned proceedings. The purpose of the technical conference was to explore issues concerning Market Efficiency Enhancement Agreements between the California Independent System Operator Corporation and eligible market participants.

During the course of the technical conference, the Commission instructed the presenting parties to file their presentations in the above dockets.

All interested persons may file written comments on these presentations and/or issues addressed in the technical conference on or before September 10, 2009. Reply comments will be due on or before September 17, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-20849 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### § 137.245 What is retrocession?

Retrocession means the return by a Self-Governance Tribe to the Secretary of PSFAs, that are included in a compact or funding agreement, for any reason, before the expiration of the term of the compact or funding agreement.
§ 405.806 Impact of reversal of contractor determinations on claims processing. ( a ) Claims for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries during a period in which the supplier billing privileges were not effective are rejected.
( b ) If a supplier is determined not to have qualified for billing privileges in one period but qualified in another, Medicare contractors process claims for services furnished to beneficiaries during the period for which the supplier was Medicare-qualified. Subpart C of this part sets forth the requirements for the recovery of overpayments.
( c ) If a revocation of a supplier's billing privileges is reversed upon appeal, the supplier's billing privileges are reinstated back to the date that the revocation became effective.
( d ) If the denial of a supplier's billing privileges is reversed upon appeal and becomes binding, then the appeal decision establishes the date that the supplier's billing privileges become effective.
! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 $! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 %! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 &! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 '! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 (! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 )! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 $! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 %! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 &! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 '! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 (! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! )! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! $! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! %! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! &! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! '! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 ! (! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " )! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " $! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " %! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " &! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " '! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 " (! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # )! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # !! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # "! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # #! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # $! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # %! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # &! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # '! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 # (! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 $ )! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 $

1 2 ( 3 4 % 2 1 2 5

6 5 2 7 (

6 & 8 2 9 % : 2 % 9 5 9 5

; : 2 % 9! " $ % & ' ( ) * + ( % , - .

* / 0 $ !

8 2 - & , < 2 = > ? > = = @ A @ B B C = D $ E 0 > + F C B C B G G > B ? D A C H @
# C_2005330EN.01002301.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/23

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2005 — Air Bourbon v Commission

(Case T-321/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Decision to raise no objections - Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing an action - Publication of a summary notice - Not admissible)

(2005/C 330/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Air Bourbon SAS (Sainte-Marie, island of Réunion, France) (represented by: S. Vaisse, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Giolito and J. Buendía Sierra, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of the Commission Decision (C(2003) 4708 final) of 16 December 2003 to raise no objections against aid N 427/2003 granted by the French authorities to Air Austral

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on Air Austral's application for leave to intervene; |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on Air Austral's application for leave to intervene;

| 3. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---