alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeDubai Regional Media Hub...Dubai Regional Media Hub  Releases

# Dubai Regional Media Hub Releases

43 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Tim Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingMay 11, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Major General Matthew McFarlane, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, and Dana Stroul, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense	  April 24, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Brian E. Nelson, Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence	  April 5, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Major General Matthew McFarlane, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, and Dana Stroul, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense	  February 28, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose Fernandez	  February 23, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with General Jacqueline Van Ovost, Commander,  U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM)	  February 15, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Derek Chollet, Counselor of the Department of State; Elizabeth Allen, Senior Official for the Bureau of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs; and Ambassador Cindy McCain, U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN Agencies in Rome	  January 10, 2023Dubai Regional Media Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Telephonic Press Briefing with General Michael E. Kurilla, Commander, U.S. Central Command	  December 22, 2022Dubai Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Briefing via Telephone with Hady Amr, U.S. Special Representative for Palestinian Affairs	  November 30, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Briefing via Telephone with U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry	  October 26, 2022 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
p.1 

RCRA Box 1883 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

78) ll-B-240 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/3/2008 10:42:15 AM Sheet 78 of 171 
A-90-19 

ll-B-240 

P.2 

PENDING CONFIDENT ^ @ E D ff 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

The following information is located in the confidential 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, January 1992, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Isopropylphenol. 12 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-240.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7448

LENDELL CURTIS BRYANT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-04-244-3) Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lendell Curtis Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Christopher Galanides, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lendell Curtis Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bryant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 576.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations. This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations. Note to § 576.101 :
The Iraqi Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 575, have been removed from 31 CFR chapter V.
§ 1003.500 Basis for civil money penalties and exclusions. ( a ) The OIG may impose a penalty against any participating hospital with an emergency department or specialized capabilities or facilities for each negligent violation of section 1867 of the Act or § 489.24 (other than § 489.24(j)) of this title.
( b ) The OIG may impose a penalty against any responsible physician for each— ( 1 ) Negligent violation of section 1867 of the Act;
( 2 ) Certification signed under section 1867(c)(l)(A) of the Act if the physician knew, or should have known, that the benefits of transfer to another facility did not outweigh the risks of such a transfer; or
( 3 ) Misrepresentation made concerning an individual's condition or other information, including a hospital's obligations under section 1867 of the Act.
( c ) The OIG may, in lieu of or in addition to any penalty available under this subpart, exclude any responsible physician who commits a gross and flagrant, or repeated, violation of this subpart from participation in Federal health care programs.
( d ) For purposes of this subpart, a “gross and flagrant violation” is a violation that presents an imminent danger to the health, safety, or well-being of the individual who seeks examination and treatment or places that individual unnecessarily in a high-risk situation.
# C_2005217EN.01001801.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-141/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias in Michail Peros v Techniko Epimelitirio Ellados (1)

1

(Directive 89/48/EEC - Workers - Recognition of diplomas - Mechanical engineer)

(2005/C 217/34)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-141/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece), made by decision of 30 December 2003, received at the Court on 17 March 2004, in the proceedings between Michail Peros and Techniko Epimelitirio Ellados — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it ruled:

Where national measures transposing Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, in the version in force until 31 July 2001, have not been adopted within the period prescribed in Article 12 thereof, a national of a Member State may rely on Article 3(a) of that directive in order to obtain, in the host Member State, authorisation to pursue a regulated profession such as that of mechanical engineer.

That possibility may not be made dependent on recognition of the qualifications of the person concerned by the competent national authorities.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
#### FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., d/b/a Burdines, Appellant, v. William PLANES and Mrs. William Planes, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-230.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 17, 1974.

Shevin, Shapo & Shevin and David A. Freedman, Miami, for appellant.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn and Stephen A. Stieglitz, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and GREEN, ROBERT A., Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in a non-jury trial entered in favor of defendants in an action for monies due and owing for the purchase of wall to wall carpeting by the defendants from the plaintiff.

The record indicates that the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. William Planes, purchased some $6,000.00 worth of carpeting from the plaintiff, Burdines, which was installed by Burdines in their home. Subsequently, the seams in the carpeting split, and upon examination, the carpeting was found to be wet. The defendants refused to pay, whereupon the plaintiff filed suit seeking to recover the monies due and owing for the carpeting. The defendants’ amended counterclaim alleged breach of warranty of merchantability and sought revocation of acceptance of the carpeting pursuant to § 672.2-608, Fla.Stat. At the trial, the plaintiff contended that the moisture was seeping up into the carpeting from the concrete slab on which it was installed. The defendants contended that the carpeting was already wet at the time the plaintiff installed it. After a full hearing on the merits, the court entered judgment for the defendants and ordered that the plaintiff remove all of the subject carpeting within thirty days. This appeal ensued.

When a trial judge hears a cause without a jury as in the case sub judice, it *249is his duty to reconcile the conflicting evidence and the appellate court is not authorized to reverse unless his findings are clearly erroneous. See 2 Fla.Jur. Appeals § 346 (1963) and cases cited therein. The judgment comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and it is the appellant’s burden to make error clearly appear. Mitchell v. Morse Operations, Inc., Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 248. After careful scrutiny of the record on appeal, we find there was substantial competent evidence to support the judgment, and finding no reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Ronald ALLEN, Appellant, v. Darrell NICKELL, Appellee.

No. 73-694.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Gary L. Cook, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Gary L. Cook
                                    ----------------
                                    Gary L. Cook
                                    Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 21, 2004
```
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #34, August 27 – September 2, 2008

Much of Afghanistan has received below normal precipitation 

during the winter and spring, along with an early snow melt 

(see Figure 1). 

During the end of the wet season, October - March, high 

temperatures depleted much of Afghanistan’s already belownormal snow pack 4 – 6 weeks earlier than normal. Hot 

temperatures have also led to increased evaporation from 

water reservoirs. This combination of factors threatens water 

availability for agriculture. Temperature anomalies have eased 

since the beginning of July. Temperatures should average 

slightly above normal in the lowlands and extreme maximum 

temperatures could reach the upper 30s (°C). Minimum 

temperatures will fall below freezing in the highest elevations 

of northeast Afghanistan. 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan was below average 

from October - May as well and, as a result, underground 

water sources, used for both drinking water and irrigation, have 

not been replenished. The cumulative effects of high 

temperatures and low rainfall have had a direct bearing on 

most households, who rely on agriculture and livestock for their 

income and food needs. During the past week, only isolated 

showers fell in far eastern Afghanistan. Dry weather is 

expected during the next week. Rain and mountain snow 

typically begin in October. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Weekly Precipitation (mm) Ending August 

24 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA

Figure 3. Precipitation forecast (mm) for August 26 

– September 2

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
No. 00-5884.

#### Delreal-Ordones *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 587.506 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 587.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 587.507, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 587.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 587.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 587.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 587.506 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
# Burundi

51 items

        -    Report  		Burundi	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		Burundi Sanctions	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Sub-Saharan Africa – Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Small Grants (Summary)	  August 7, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		PRM Livelihoods Programs in Ethiopia and Burundi – Synthesis Report [Archive]	  August 27, 2015 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		PRM Livelihoods Programs for Returned Refugees in Burundi [Archive]	  August 1, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Burundi (14-422) – Agreement Regarding the Status of United States Personnel in the Republic of Burundi	  April 22, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Burundi (07-1212) – Agreement for Economic and Technical Cooperation	  December 12, 2007 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
§ 579.307 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 579.307 :
See § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



---

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2006.

/s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger

C. Jayson Brentlinger

Chief Executive Officer
#### § 11.40 Who must submit clinical trial results information?

The responsible party for an applicable clinical trial specified in § 11.42 must submit clinical trial results information for that clinical trial.