alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     U. S. Dollars              
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996          
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996   
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1   
<CASH>                               140,030  
<SECURITIES>                       5,993,228
<RECEIVABLES>                        679,538
<ALLOWANCES>                          45,000             
<INVENTORY>                        1,128,907       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   7,943,665
<PP&E>                             4,242,614        
<DEPRECIATION>                     2,840,909  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     9,899,356  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,206,829  
<BONDS>                                    0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                          375,000  
<COMMON>                             144,103   
<OTHER-SE>                         8,173,424  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       9,899,356  
<SALES>                            6,558,025  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   6,558,025  
<CGS>                              4,282,062  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,282,062  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   4,730,853  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,094,332)  
<INCOME-TAX>                        (388,000) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,706,332) 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0  
<CHANGES>                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,706,332)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.60) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.60) 
        


</TABLE>
# C_2005271EN.01001002.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 September 2005

in Case C-462/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/40/EC - Mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals - Failure to implement within the prescribed time-limit)

(2005/C 271/19)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-462/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: C. O'Reilly and E. de March) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia and A. Cingolo) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 29 October 2004 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and M. Ilešič, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 September 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing within the prescribed time-limit to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals, with the exception of Article 7 thereof, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing within the prescribed time-limit to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals, with the exception of Article 7 thereof, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6 of 08.01.2005.

1

---
```

[106th Congress Public Law 486]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ486.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2201]]

Public Law 106-486
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high 
 altitude rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of 
   Alaska, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2000 -  [S. 698]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That no later than nine 
months after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
(hereinafter referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall complete a report 
on the suitability and feasibility of recovering the costs of high 
altitude rescues on Mt. McKinley, within Denali National Park and 
Preserve. The Secretary shall also report on the suitability and 
feasibility of requiring climbers to provide proof of medical insurance 
prior to the issuance of a climbing permit by the National Park Service. 
The report shall also review the amount of fees charged for a climbing 
permit and make such recommendations for changing the fee structure as 
the Secretary deems appropriate. Upon completion, the report shall be 
submitted to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 
Senate, and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives.

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 698:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-71 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 145 (1999):
                                    Nov. 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 146 (2000):
                                    Oct. 24, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3051 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3051

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to further restrict certain 
   activities relating to biological weapons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 1996

Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Kasich, and Mr. Markey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to further restrict certain 
   activities relating to biological weapons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Biological Weapons Enhanced 
Penalties Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. ATTEMPTS TO ACQUIRE UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.

    Section 175(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``attempts to acquire under false pretenses,'' after 
``acquires,''.

SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF RECOMBINANT MOLECULES.

    Section 175 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``recombinant molecules,'' after ``toxin,'' each place it 
appears.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 178 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``or naturally occurring 
        or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, or 
        infectious substance,'' after ``infectious substance'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``the toxic material of plants, 
                animals, microorganisms, viruses, fungi, or infectious 
                substances'' after ``means''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, and includes'' after 
                ``production'';
            (3) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``or a molecule, 
        including a recombinant molecule,'' after ``organism''.

SEC. 5. THREATENING USE OF CERTAIN WEAPONS.

    Section 2332a of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, threatens,'' after ``uses, or''.

SEC. 6. INCLUSION OF RECOMBINANT MOLECULES AND BIOLOGICAL ORGANISMS IN 
              DEFINITION.

    Section 2332a(b)(2)(C) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``disease organism'' and inserting ``biological agent or 
toxin, as those terms are defined in section 178''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 137.136 What happens if the agency takes no action within the 45 day review period (or any extensions thereof)?

The final offer is accepted automatically by operation of law.
June 1, 2015

Mr. Jeremy Ryan High Flying Images

63 Coniston Road Short Hills, NJ 07078

Dear Mr. Ryan:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1366), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00473-CR

Delfino Torres-Vasquez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-DC-16-904032, THE HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The State’s brief was originally due March 28, 2018. On counsel’s motions, the 

time for filing was extended to June 28, 2018. The State’s counsel has now filed a fourth motion, 

requesting that the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief. We grant the motion for 

extension of time and order the State to file a brief no later than July 30, 2018. No further 

extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the case 

being submitted to this Court on the appellant’s brief alone.

It is ordered on July 3, 2018. 

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Do Not Publish
#### § 590.703 Penalty imposition.

If, after considering any written response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and any relevant facts, OFAC determines that there was a violation by the alleged violator named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and that a civil monetary penalty is appropriate, OFAC may issue a Penalty Notice to the violator containing a determination of the violation and the imposition of the monetary penalty. For additional details concerning issuance of a Penalty Notice, see appendix A to part 501 of this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty Notice shall constitute final agency action. The violator has the right to seek judicial review of that final agency action in federal district court.
#### Jeremiah E. Mecray et ux., appellants, *v.*Isador Goldman et al., respondents.

[Decided October 14th, 1929.]

*Messrs. Cole & Cole,*for the appellants.

*Mr. Emerson L. Richards,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in *103 N. J. Eq. 559.*

*For affirmance*— The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
§ 598.701 Penalties. ( a ) Attention is directed to section 807 of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, which is applicable to violations of the provisions of any license, rule, or regulation issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under that Act. Section 807 of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, as adjusted pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-410, as amended, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note), provides that: ( 1 ) Whoever willfully violates the provisions of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, or any license, rule, or regulation issued pursuant to that Act, or willfully neglects or refuses to comply with any order of the President issued under that Act, shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, fined in the amount provided in title 18, United States Code, or both, or, in the case of an entity, fined not more than $10,000,000;
( 2 ) Any officer, director, or agent of any entity who knowingly participates in a violation of the provisions of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, shall be imprisoned for not more than 30 years, fined not more than $5,000,000, or both;
( 3 ) A civil penalty not to exceed the amount set forth in section 807 of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (21 U.S.C. 1901-1908) per violation may be imposed by the Secretary of the Treasury on any person who violates any license, order, rule, or regulation issued in compliance with the provisions of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act.
( 4 ) The maximum civil penalty is $1,829,177 per violation.
( b ) *Adjustments to penalty amounts.* ( 1 ) The current civil penalty cap may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-410, as amended, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note).
( 2 ) The criminal penalties provided in this part are subject to increase pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3571.
( c ) Attention is directed to 18 U.S.C. 1001, which provides that whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
( d ) Violations of this part may also be subject to relevant provisions of other applicable laws.
[65 FR 41336, July 5, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 61361, Oct. 28, 2003; 81 FR 43077, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 10439, Feb. 10, 2017; 83 FR 11881, Mar. 19, 2018; 84 FR 27719, June 14, 2019; 85 FR 19888, Apr. 9, 2020; 86 FR 14539, Mar. 17, 2021; 87 FR 7373, Feb. 9, 2022; 88 FR 2234, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 2144, Jan. 12, 2024]
# C_2006011EN.01000802.xml

| 17.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4029 — Kuehne + Nagel/ACR Logistics)

(2006/C 11/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4029. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4029. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Burma Independence Day

# 									Burma Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

January 3, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I reaffirm our commitment to the people of Burma as they mark the 76th Anniversary of the country’s independence on January 4.

The United States has long supported the people of Burma and their right to chart their own future toward a cohesive union. The military’s campaign of violence since the February 2021 coup has not dimmed the strong commitment of the people of Burma to regain their prosperity and advance the goals of freedom, peace, and justice. We mourn and honor the lives lost in this pursuit.

We stand in solidarity with the people of Burma in their resolve to bring democracy, self-determination, stability, and security to their country. The military regime must end its violence, release all those unjustly and arbitrarily detained, allow unhindered humanitarian access, and recognize the people’s desire to return to the path of progress and inclusive democracy.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2933

To amend the Small Business Act concerning the level of participation by

the Small Business Administration in loans guaranteed under the Export

Working Capital Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. BALDACCI (for himself, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. SISISKY, Mrs.

CLAYTON, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. BENTSEN, and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act concerning the level of

participation by the Small Business Administration in

loans guaranteed under the Export Working Capital Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Export Working Cap5 ital Program Enhancement Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2933 IH

1 SEC. 2. LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION IN GUARANTEED LOANS

2 UNDER EXPORT WORKING CAPITAL PRO3 GRAM.

4 Section 7(a)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.

5 636(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(D) PARTICIPATION UNDER EXPORT

7 WORKING CAPITAL PROGRAM.—Notwithstanding

8 subparagraph (A), in an agreement to partici9 pate in a loan on a deferred basis under the

10 Export Working Capital Program established

11 pursuant to paragraph (14)(A), such participa12 tion by the Administration shall be equal to the

13 rate specified under this paragraph as in effect

14 on the day before the date of the enactment of

15 the Small Business Lending Enhancement Act

16 of 1995.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Datakey, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Timothy L. Russell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


     Date: March 26, 2003         Signature: /s/ Timothy L. Russell
                                             Timothy L. Russell
                                             Chief Executive Officer
§ 407.18 Determining month of automatic enrollment. ( a ) An individual who is automatically enrolled in SMI under § 407.17 will have the month of enrollment determined in accordance with paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section. The month of enrollment determines the month of entitlement.
( b ) An individual is automatically enrolled in the third month of the initial enrollment period if he or she— ( 1 ) Is entitled to social security benefits under section 202 of the Act on the first day of the initial enrollment period;
( 2 ) Is entitled to hospital insurance based on end-stage renal disease; on entitlement to disability benefits as a social security or railroad retirement beneficiary; or on deemed entitlement to disability benefits on the basis of Medicare-qualified government employment; or
( 3 ) Establishes entitlement to hospital insurance by filing an application and meeting all other requirements (as set forth in subpart B of part 406 of this chapter) during the first 3 months of the initial enrollment period.
( c ) If an individual establishes entitlement to hospital insurance on the basis of an application filed in the last 4 months of the SMI initial enrollment period, he or she is automatically enrolled for SMI in the month in which the application is filed.
( d ) If an individual establishes entitlement to hospital insurance on the basis of an application filed after the SMI initial enrollment period but not during a general enrollment period in effect before April 1, 1981, or after September 30, 1981, he or she is automatically enrolled for SMI on the first day of the next general enrollment period.
( e ) If the individual establishes entitlement to hospital insurance on the basis of an application filed during a SMI general enrollment period in effect before April 1, 1981 or after September 30, 1981, he or she is automatically enrolled on the first day of that period.
( f ) If an individual established entitlement to hospital insurance on the basis of an application filed during the general enrollment period of April 1, 1981, through September 30, 1981, he or she was automatically enrolled for SMI on the first day of the month in which the application was filed.