alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Ecuador

128 items

        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ecuador	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Government Support for the Eastern Tropical Pacific Marine Corridor	  March 22, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Government Activities in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Seascape	  March 22, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks at the High-Level Dialogue on the Eastern Tropical Pacific Marine Corridor	  Jose W. FernandezMarch 22, 2022San Jose, Costa Rica 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Former Ecuadorian President Bucaram for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Ned PriceMarch 9, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs benefiting vulnerable PRM populations of concern in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela	  February 4, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Holguín	  January 28, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Strengthening U.S. Open Skies Civil Aviation Partnerships	  December 10, 2021 

previous page1…56789…13next page

Back to Top
§ 589.401 Reference to amended sections. ( a ) Reference to any section in this part is a reference to the same as currently amended, unless the reference includes a specific date. *See* 44 U.S.C. 1510.
( b ) Reference to any ruling, order, instruction, direction, or license issued pursuant to this part is a reference to the same as currently amended unless otherwise so specified.
#### Randy HART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 13, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1981.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Laura R. Morrison, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Though the evidence of appellant’s guilt is overwhelming, we are nonetheless compelled to reverse and remand for new trial on the authority of *Tascano v. State,*393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded.

BERANEK, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
HomePoland

# Poland

185 items

        -    DipNote  		New Initiative for Global Impact through the International Visitor Leadership Program	  February 8, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Poland’s National Security Advisors	  February 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Strategic Dialogue Between the United States and Poland	  February 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Donfried’s Travel to Italy, Vatican City, and Poland	  January 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Polish Foreign Minister Rau	  December 9, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And Polish Foreign Minister Zbigniew Rau  Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 9, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Undersecretary Nuland’s Travel to Poland	  November 29, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba	  November 17, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 16, 2022	  Vedant PatelNovember 16, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Polish Foreign Minister Rau	  November 15, 2022 

previous page1…45678…19next page

Back to Top
#### Ronald E. McCASKILL v. TEXACO, INC.

77-664.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1978.

William H. Saliba, Mobile, for appellant.

David W. Green, Mobile, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

To prevail on appeal, under well-established rules of review, it is incumbent upon the aggrieved party to show manifest error below prejudicial to the Appellant’s substantial rights. Having carefully considered the entire record on appeal, along with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find that the Appellant has not met this burden.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
# Kuwait

92 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Kuwait	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Briefing via Telephone with Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. Fifth Fleet, and Combined Maritime Forces	  May 11, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kuwait	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Kuwaiti Deputy Foreign Minister Dhafiri	  March 1, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Kuwait National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 25, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary of State Yael Lempert Travels to Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Kuwait	  February 4, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement for the U.S.-Kuwait Strategic Dialogue	  January 27, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Ahmed Nasser Al-Mohammed Al-Sabah Statements to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 26, 2022Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Al-Sabah	  January 17, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Kuwait	  December 16, 2021 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.177 Is the Self-Governance Tribe required to make its records available to the Secretary?

Yes, after 30 days advance written notice from the Secretary, the Self-Governance Tribe must provide the Secretary with reasonable access to such records to enable the Department to meet its minimum legal recordkeeping system requirements under sections 3101 through 3106 of title 44 United States Code.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 193 (Thursday, October 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 60741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8049]

In the Matter of the Designation of the Mujahadin-e Khalq, Also 
Known as MEK, Also Known as Mujahadin-e Khalq Organization, Also Known 
as MKO, Also Known as Muslim Iranian Students' Society, Also Known as 
National Council of Resistance, Also Known as NCR, Also Known as 
Organization of the People's Holy Warriors of Iran, Also Known as the 
National Liberation Army of Iran, Also Known as NLA, Also Known as 
People's Mujahadin Organization of Iran, Also Known as PMOI, Also Known 
as National Council of Resistance of Iran, Also Known as NCRI, Also 
Known as Sazeman-e Mujahadin-e Khalq-e Iran, as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as Amended

    In consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I hereby revoke the designation of the Mujahadin-e Khalq, and 
its aliases, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 
219 (a)(6)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 
U.S.C. 1189(a)(6)(A)). This action takes effect September 28, 2012.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 21, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-24505 Filed 10-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
§ 1005.12 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this part or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event or default, and includes the last day of the period unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday observed by the Federal Government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays observed by the Federal Government will be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a document has been served or issued by placing it in the mail, an additional 5 days will be added to the time permitted for any response. This paragraph does not apply to requests for hearing under § 1005.2.
§ 1001.951 Fraud and kickbacks and other prohibited activities. ( a ) *Circumstance for exclusion.* ( 1 ) Except as provided for in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, the OIG may exclude any individual or entity that it determines has committed an act described in section 1128B(b) of the Act.
( 2 ) With respect to acts described in section 1128B of the Act, the OIG— ( i ) May exclude any individual or entity that it determines has knowingly and willfully solicited, received, offered or paid any remuneration in the manner and for the purposes described therein, irrespective of whether the individual or entity may be able to prove that the remuneration was also intended for some other purpose; and
( ii ) Will not exclude any individual or entity if that individual or entity can prove that the remuneration that is the subject of the exclusion is exempted from serving as the basis for an exclusion.
( b ) *Length of exclusion.* ( 1 ) The following factors will be considered in determining the length of exclusion in accordance with this section— ( i ) The nature and circumstances of the acts and other similar acts;
( ii ) The nature and extent of any adverse physical, mental, financial or other impact the conduct had on program beneficiaries or other individuals or the Medicare, Medicaid and all other Federal health care programs;
( iii ) Whether the individual or entity has a documented history of criminal, civil or administrative wrongdoing (The lack of any prior record is to be considered neutral);
( iv ) The individual or entity has been the subject of any other adverse action by any Federal, State or local government agency or board, if the adverse action is based on the same set of circumstances that serves as the basis for the imposition of the exclusion; or
( v ) Any other facts bearing on the nature and seriousness of the individual's or entity's misconduct.
( 2 ) It will be considered a mitigating factor if— ( i ) The individual had a documented mental, emotional, or physical condition before or during the commission of the prohibited act(s) that reduced the individual's culpability for the acts in question; or
( ii ) The individual's or entity's cooperation with Federal or State officials resulted in the— ( A ) Sanctioning of other individuals or entities, or
( B ) Imposition of a civil money penalty against others.
( c ) *Limitations.* The OIG may not impose an exclusion under this section more than 10 years after the date when an act which is described in section 1128B(b) of the Act occurred.
[57 FR 3330, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 46689, Sept. 2, 1998; 67 FR 11933, Mar. 18, 2002; 82 FR 4114, Jan. 12, 2017]
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael Frederick HARRACH, Appellee.

No. 78-478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 16, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1979.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Jacobi & Jacobi, North Miami, for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Johnson v. State,*249 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *Alexander v. State,*288 So.2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
#### Grimes *v.*Percival.

A notice to a justice of the peace not signed by the party is insufficient, though delivered by the party in person, who was known to the justice.

In error from the District Court of Allegheny.

Debt against a justice for the penalty under the marriage act. *136The plaintiff proved a delivery by himself of a notice of his intention to bring the action to the justice; and it appeared that the justice knew the plaintiff, and after receiving the paper, they had a conversation on the subject of the action.

The court rejected the notice as evidence because it was not signed by the party, and its sufficiency was the question.

*Wylie*for plaintiff in error,

cited 2 S. & R. 440; 5 W. 370; 3 Ib. 445; 2 W. & S. 100; Greenl. Ev. § 96-7.

*Hampton,*contra.

3 S. & R. 296; 7 W. & S. 262; 1 Barr, 403.

*Sept.*18.

Per, Curiam.

When a plaintiff in person gives notice of action to a justice of the peace, he must not endorse the name of his attorney on it; but why should he not sign it with his name? Though not requiring the form, such a notice ought to have the substance of a declaration; and it ought to be complete in itself without borrowing certainty from matter *dehors.*Thus a notice signed by the plaintiff, and endorsed, *“*Henry Reed, Esq., living in Poplar Lane,” was held to be an insufficient indication that he was the plaintiff’s attorney; yet no one would doubt that his name was endorsed to satisfy the statute, which requires the name of the attorney to be endorsed. So dating a notice at a particular place, has been held an insufficient averment that the party resided there, though legal acts are almost invariably dated at the place of the party’s residence. Here an unsigned notice was handed to the justice by the plaintiff in person; but what if it had been sent by a messenger ? The justice might have exacted the necessary information from him in respect to the identity of the writer ; and so he might have done, in respect to the information wanted in the cases taken from our own decisions. But there cannot be one rule for a notice served by the plaintiff, and another for a notice served by his agent. To avoid the uncertainty that would be incurred by departing from a plain and practical rule, it is necessary to say that the notice must contain the elements of the information required within itself. The want of the plaintiff’s name as an act of authentication, therefore, is a defect that cannot be remedied.

Judgment affirmed.
# Spain

125 items

        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Spain	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to Turkey, Spain, Morocco, and Algeria	  March 10, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Spanish State Secretary for Foreign and Global Affairs Moreno Bau	  March 7, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Spain-U.S. Cybersecurity Seminar	  Wendy R. ShermanMarch 7, 2022Madrid, Spain 
        -    		Travel to Turkey, Spain, Morocco, and Algeria, March 4-10, 2022	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to Turkey, Spain, Morocco, Algeria, and Egypt	  March 3, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Acting Coordinator for Global COVID-19 Response and Health Security Mary Beth Goodman	  Digital Press Briefing with Acting Coordinator for Global COVID-19 Response and Health Security Mary Beth GoodmanFebruary 15, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 18, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Spanish Foreign Minister Albares	  January 18, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Spanish State Secretary for Foreign and Global Affairs Bau	  January 5, 2022 

previous page1…56789…13next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALFIN, INC.,
AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         329,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  329,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,001,167
<INVENTORY>                                  2,853,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,906,722
<PP&E>                                       5,199,969
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,904,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,915,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,609,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,237,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,915,026
<SALES>                                     22,953,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,953,823
<CGS>                                        7,743,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,871,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                300,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            165,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   165,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 597.500 Licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part.

[68 FR 53660, Sept. 11, 2003]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific 
Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, October 8, 2013, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, 
October 9, 2013, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: American Geophysical Union, (AGU), 2000 Florida Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20009-1277.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research; SC-21/Germantown Building; U.S. 
Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue SW.; Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone (301) 903-7486.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and recommendations to the Department of Energy on scientific 
priorities within the field of advanced scientific computing research.

Tentative Agenda Topics

 View from Washington
 View from Germantown
 Update on Exascale
 Update from Exascale technical approaches subcommittee
 Facilities update
 Report from Applied Math Committee of Visitors
 Exascale technical talks
 Public Comment (10-minute rule)

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. A Webcast 
of this meeting will be available. Please check the Web site below for 
updates and information on how to view the meeting. If you would like 
to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Melea 
Baker by telephone at: (301) 903-7486 or email: 
(Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov). You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least five business days prior to the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for viewing 
on the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Advanced Scientific 
Computing Web site at http://science.energy.gov/ascr.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 10, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-22457 Filed 9-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-K), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 8, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce     
|Alan M. Pearce         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the
Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 99


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Partnership.




March 31, 2003                                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
--------------                                   --------------------
     Date                                        Joseph M. Jayson
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer