alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

p0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

140777 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140777 

 COA: 295399 

Wayne CC: 79-001738-FC 

BRADY JOSEPH SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS105558 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# Ghana

106 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    		United States Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability: Country and Region Plans	  March 22, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Ghana National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 6, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Accra, Ghana: Lincoln Community School Accra: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 29, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Ghanaian Parliament’s Passage of Legislation Undermines Human Rights	  Matthew MillerFebruary 28, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on U.S. Environmental Efforts on the African Continent	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnFebruary 27, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Countering the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  February 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Marrakesh Co-Chairs’ Summary	  February 2, 2024 

123…11next page

Back to Top
§ 37.97 Notification of spirometry results. ( a ) Findings must be communicated to the miner or, if requested by the miner, to the miner's designated physician. The health care professional at the NIOSH-approved facility must inform the miner if the spirometry shows abnormal results or if the respiratory assessment suggests he or she may benefit from the medical follow-up or a smoking cessation intervention.
( b ) NIOSH will notify the miner of his or her spirometry test results, a comparison between current and previously submitted spirometry tests (if available), and will advise the miner to contact a health care professional as appropriate based on the results.
[81 FR 73289, Oct. 24, 2016]
""LEIVE

DATEi~3

STATE OF COLOFADO

Bill Ritter, Jr., Governor

Martha E. Rudolph, Executive Director

Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado

4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Services Division

Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 8100 Lowry Blvd.

Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80230-6928 TDD Line (303) 691-7700 (303) 692-3090 Colorado Department Located in Glendale, Colorado of Public Health

http://www.cdphe.state.co.us and Environment

March 22, 2010

Ms. Carol Rushin

Acting Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

Re: CDPHE Concurrence with Proposed NPL Notice of (partial) Deletion (NOIDp) for the On-Post Central and

Eastern Surface and Off-Post Surface Areas of Rocky Mountain Arsenal

Dear Ms. Rushin:

My staff has reviewed the Draft Notice of Intent to Partially Delete (NOID)p Areas of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Site for

the Central and Eastern Surface (CES) areas of the On-Post Operating Unit, and the Off-Post Surface (OPS) area. This report

summarizes the relevantprojeqct information documenting the•Completion of the remedial actions that were required by both

the On-PokstRec6rd of Decision (On-Post ROD),. and the Off-Post Record of Decision (Off-Post ROD). All remedial actions

required by the RODs for structures and surface media (soil, surface water and sediment), have been completed in the Central

'and Eastern Surface Areas and the Off-Post Surface Areas identified in the draft NOIDp.

CDPHE concurs with EPA that this partial deletion pertains only to surface media. Groundwater remediation in these areas

is not complete. The groundwater west of E Street must remain on the NPL and continue to be treated by functioning water

treatment systems currently in place. All groundwater in the Off-Post Study Area must remain on the NPL and continue to

be treated by the functioning water treatment systems currently in place.

Based upon our evaluation of the NOIDp and upon our observations as the required ROD activities were implemented, the

State concurs that all actions required under CERCLA have been implemented to protect human health and the environment

in the areas proposed for deletion. CDPHE looks forward to working with EPA to address any issues raised through the

public comment process.

Sincerely,

Howard Roitman

Director

Office of Environmental Programs

cc" ' Charlie Scharmann, RMA ..... Laura Williams, EPA

. . gei'shakely, Shell; Ken Conright,.TCHD . T6m -Jackson, USFWS- , .. RichardL,'otiAGOý"' . ; .. .' . . """

Jack Lipschultz, DOJ Trevor Klotz, Sentinel Consulting .. i ----- *----

Westlyn Erickson, RMA .- Ken Vogler, CDPHE . 11111I111111

Gary W. Baughman, CDPHE File RMA #31.1 •00049653 17825 -1
#### § 137.352 What is contained in a construction project progress report?

Construction project progress reports contain information about accomplishments during the reporting period and issues and concerns of the Self-Governance Tribe, if any.
#### In re NERI BROS. CONSTRUCTION CORP., Debtor. John J. O'Neil, Jr. as Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee-Appellant, v. Dominic Caciopoli, Creditor-Appellee.

No. 00-5035.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2001.

John J. O’Neil, Jr., Francis, O’Neil & Del Piano, Hartford, CT, for appellant.

David S. Doyle, The Marcus Law Firm, New Haven, CT, for appellee.

Present KEARSE, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Second Circuit and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said Bankruptcy Appellate Panel be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in that Panel’s Opinion dated April 6, 2000. Although appellant argues that the panel improperly applied a *de novo*stan*108dard of review to the bankruptcy court’s factual determinations, he points to no findings of historical fact that were overturned. The Bankruptcy Code provides that a bankruptcy trustee, with court approval, may appoint special counsel to represent the debtor “if,” *inter alia,*“such attorney does not represent or hold any interest adverse to the debtor or to the estate with respect to the matter on which such attorney is to be employed.” 11 U.S.C. § 327(e); *see, e.g., Bank Brussels Lambert v. Coan (In re AroChem Corp.),*176 F.3d 610, 623 (2d Cir.1999) (holding an interest adverse to the estate includes “possess[ing] or assert[ing] any economic interest that would tend to lessen the value of the bankruptcy estate or that would create either an actual or potential dispute in which the estate is a rival claimant” (internal quotation marks omitted)). The question whether the historical facts give the attorney an interest that is, or is potentially, adverse to the interests of the debtor or the estate within the meaning of § 327(e) is a question of law. Such questions are properly reviewed *de novo. See, e.g., Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. (In re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.),*146 F.3d 136, 138 (2d Cir.1998).

We have considered all of appellant’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2



 


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 Description of an oral employment agreement between
Joseph Isaacs and the Company 


 


The Company has no written employment
agreements with its officer and director, however commencing September 1, 2011, the Board has agreed to pay its President ,
Joseph Isaacs, $4,000 per month, if the funds are available and if not, then to accrue such $4,000. This is a month to month
“at will” agreement and may be terminated at any time by the Company without any liability to the Company for such
termination. There are no other terms or conditions relating to the employment of Mr. Isaacs by the Company. There are no benefits,
either medical or auto and no requirements for bonuses or pensions.
§ 1001.1601 Violations of the limitations on physician charges. ( a ) *Circumstance for exclusion.* ( 1 ) The OIG may exclude a physician whom it determines— ( i ) Is a non-participating physician under section 1842(j) of the Act;
( ii ) Furnished services to a beneficiary;
( iii ) Knowingly and willfully billed— ( A ) On a repeated basis for such services actual charges in excess of the maximum allowable actual charge determined in accordance with section 1842(j)(1)(C) of the Act for the period January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1990, or
( B ) Individuals enrolled under part B of title XVIII of the Act during the statutory freeze for actual charges in excess of such physician's actual charges determined in accordance with section 1842(j)(1)(A) of the Act for the period July 1, 1984 to December 31, 1986; and”
( iv ) Is not the sole community physician or sole source of essential specialized services in the community.
( 2 ) The OIG will take into account access of beneficiaries to physicians' services for which Medicare payment may be made in determining whether to impose an exclusion.
( b ) *Length of exclusion.* ( 1 ) In determining the length of an exclusion in accordance with this section, the OIG will consider the following factors— ( i ) The number of services for which the physician billed in excess of the maximum allowable charges;
( ii ) The number of beneficiaries for whom services were billed in excess of the maximum allowable charges;
( iii ) The amount of the charges that were in excess of the maximum allowable charges; and
( iv ) Whether the physician has a documented history of criminal, civil, or administrative wrongdoing (the lack of any prior record is to be considered neutral).
( 2 ) The period of exclusion may not exceed 5 years.
[57 FR 3329, Jan. 29, 1992; 57 FR 9669, Mar. 20, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 46689, Sept. 2, 1998; 82 FR 4116, Jan. 12, 2017]
# C_2005217EN.01006203.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/62

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-54/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/124)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-54/97, H.J. Leemkuil v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997.

1

---
#### Ronald WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Dominick J. Salfi, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Angola

92 items

        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Angola	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL: Reducing Corruption in Angola	  February 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Angola	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Angola	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Angola	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Angola	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Angola	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Angola	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Report  		Angola	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Angola	  November 13, 2018 

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top
#### Robert Evans WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. TONKS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-56055.

D.C. No. CV-98-00945-CBM-CTx.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 2001.*

Decided Feb. 20, 2001.

Before LEAVY, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER **

This appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Appellant Walker did not return an acknowledgment of oral argument, nor did he appear at oral argument, which was scheduled for February 9, 2001. The appeal is accordingly DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided in Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
HomeFinland

# Finland

170 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation With Finland	  April 11, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – North Atlantic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, April 4, 2023	   
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – Finland Accession Protocol – Notification of Entry Into Force, April 4, 2023	   
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – Finland Accession Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Turkiye, April 4, 2023	   
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Finland’s NATO Instruments of Accession Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu at the Deposit of Türkiye’s Instruments of Ratification of Finland’s NATO Accession	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Press Statement  		Finland’s Accession to NATO	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Finnish Permanent State Secretary Salovaara	  April 3, 2023 

previous page1…34567…17next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 303

To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired members of the

Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with

retired pay, without deduction from either.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Mr. TEJEDA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired

members of the Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with retired

pay, without deduction from either.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 5304(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code,

4 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

5 ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, emergency offi6 cers’, regular, or reserve retirement pay may be paid to

7 any veteran concurrently with compensation for any serv-
2

•HR 303 IH

1 ice-connected disability, without deduction from either the

2 retirement pay or the compensation; however, nothing in

3 this sentence shall permit payment of retirement pay and

4 of compensation based upon the same disability.’’.

Æ
HomeSaint Vincent and the Grenadines

# Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

53 items

        -    Press Statement  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 27, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  October 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 27, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: St. Vincent and the Grenadines	  July 19, 2022 

123…6next page

Back to Top
#### § 1003.1400 Basis for civil money penalties.

The OIG may impose a civil money penalty against any individual or entity described in 45 CFR 171.103(a)(2) that commits information blocking, as set forth in 45 CFR part 171.
§ 137.18 What criteria must an Indian Tribe satisfy to be eligible to participate in self-governance? To be eligible to participate in self-governance, an Indian Tribe must have: ( a ) Successfully completed the planning phase described in § 137.20;
( b ) Requested participation in self-governance by resolution or other official action by the governing body of each Indian Tribe to be served; and
( c ) Demonstrated, for three fiscal years, financial stability and financial management capability.
# C_2005229EN.01002901.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/29

---

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Frank Sliggers against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-261/05)

(2005/C 229/61)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Frank Sliggers, resident in Schilde (Belgium), represented Lucas Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 14 December 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 14 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 14 December 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 14 September 2004;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 14 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as a contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 14 September 2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Fernandez Tunon

Commission

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20276 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS AGUIRRE, also known as Jorge Gonzalez Patino, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-405-3

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Aguirre appeals his sentence for his convictions for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Aguirre argues that the district court improperly enhanced his offense level for possessing a dangerous weapon in connection with the drug trafficking offense. The sentencing guidelines provide that a defendant's offense level should be increased in relation to a drug crime if the defendant possessed a dangerous
weapon. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1); United States v. Gaytan , 74No. 01-20276 -2- F.3d 545, 559 (5th Cir. 1996). “The adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3); see United States v. Vasquez , 161 F.3d 909, 912 (5th Cir. 1998). The weapons were found in Aguirre’s residence, which was used to store large quantities of drugs to be distributed in smaller amounts. See United States v. McKeever , 906 F.2d 129, 134 (5th Cir. 1990). As it is not “clearly improbable” that the firearms were connected to the offense, the district court did not clearly err in applying the enhancement under § 2D1.1(b). United States v. Broussard , 80 F.3d 1025, 1041 (5th Cir. 1996). AFFIRMED.