alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners XI 1995 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000702986
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XI
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         869,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,788
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      28,394,901
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,284,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,840,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     30,658,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,540,887)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,840,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,560,901
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,881,884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,322,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                555,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            555,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                220,594
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   776,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Countries & Areas

		Subscribe		

198 items

        -    		Côte d’Ivoire	  April 19, 2019 
        -    		Croatia	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Cuba	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Cyprus	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Czechia	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Democratic Republic of the Congo	  April 19, 2019 
        -    		Denmark	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Djibouti	  April 19, 2019 
        -    		Dominica	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Dominican Republic	  April 23, 2019 

previous page1…34567…20next page

Back to Top
PUBLIC LAW 110–337—OCT. 2, 2008 122 STAT. 3729 

Public Law 110–337 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger facility fee eligibility 

for certain noise compatibility projects. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXPANDED PASSENGER FACILITY FEE ELIGIBILITY FOR 

NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROJECTS. 

Section 40117(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(7) NOISE MITIGATION FOR CERTAIN SCHOOLS.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the uses specified 

in paragraphs (1), (4), and (6), the Secretary may authorize 

a passenger facility fee imposed under paragraph (1) or 

(4) at a large hub airport that is the subject of an amended 

judgment and final order in condemnation filed on January 

7, 1980, by the Superior Court of the State of California 

for the county of Los Angeles, to be used for a project 

to carry out noise mitigation for a building, or for the 

replacement of a relocatable building with a permanent 

building, in the noise impacted area surrounding the airport at which such building is used primarily for educational purposes, notwithstanding the air easement 

granted or any terms to the contrary in such judgment 

and final order, if— 

‘‘(i) the Secretary determines that the building is 

adversely affected by airport noise; 

‘‘(ii) the building is owned or chartered by the 

school district that was the plaintiff in case number 

986,442 or 986,446, which was resolved by such judgment and final order; 

‘‘(iii) the project is for a school identified in 1 

of the settlement agreements effective February 16, 

2005, between the airport and each of the school districts; 

‘‘(iv) in the case of a project to replace a relocatable 

building with a permanent building, the eligible project 

costs are limited to the actual structural construction 

costs necessary to mitigate aircraft noise in instructional classrooms to an interior noise level meeting 

current standards of the Federal Aviation Administration; and 

‘‘(v) the project otherwise meets the requirements 

of this section for authorization of a passenger facility 

fee. 

Oct. 2, 2008 

[S. 996] 


etreine on CSHP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
122 STAT. 3730 PUBLIC LAW 110–337—OCT. 2, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 996: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 17, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

‘‘(B) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.—In subparagraph 

(A)(iv), the term ‘eligible project costs’ means the difference 

between the cost of standard school construction and the 

cost of construction necessary to mitigate classroom noise 

to the standards of the Federal Aviation Administration.’’. 

Approved October 2, 2008. 


etreine on CSHP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 137.41 What PSFAs must be included in a funding agreement?

At the Self-Governance Tribe's option, all PSFAs identified in and in accordance with section 505(b) of the Act must be included in a funding agreement, subject to section 507(c) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-6(c)].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          17,418
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,353
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,901
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,922
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,653
<LOANS>                                        255,405
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 382,791
<DEPOSITS>                                     306,653
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,302
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,743
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,204
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 382,791
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,722
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,237
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,053
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,529
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,524
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      501
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 106
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.22
<LOANS-NON>                                        934
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   791
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,638
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      333
<RECOVERIES>                                       131
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,937
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               998
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,939
        

</TABLE>
HomeLuxembourg

# Luxembourg

50 items

        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (17-531) – Agreement on Law Enforcement Cooperation	  May 31, 2017 
        -    Report  		Luxembourg	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (15-729.1) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and with Respect to the United States Information Reporting Provisions Commonly known as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 29, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (10-1014) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Reciprocal Defense Procurement	  October 14, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (10-201.39) – Instrument Amending the Treaty of March 13, 1997 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (10-201.15) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Extradition	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (12977) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement of August 19, 1986, as Amended	  June 12, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (12804) – Treaty on Extradition	  February 1, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (12842) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Luxembourg (12807) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  October 10, 1996 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
#### § 525.311 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
HomeMalaysia

# Malaysia

111 items

        -    TIAS  		Malaysia (97-602) – Treaty on Extradition	  June 2, 1997 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
HomeEl Salvador

# El Salvador

135 items

        -    Press Statement  		Salvadoran Re-Election Ruling Undermines Democracy	  Ned PriceSeptember 5, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Visa Actions Supporting Democracy and Combatting Corruption in Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 4, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Strengthening UN Peacekeeping Through the Global Peace Operations Initiative	  Stanley L. BrownJuly 22, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: El Salvador	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Envoy for the Northern Triangle Ricardo Zuniga On Release of the Section 353 Report (aka Corrupt Actors List)	  Ned PriceJuly 1, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland Travel to Paraguay, Panama, and El Salvador	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		Sección 353 Informe sobre actores corruptos y antidemocráticos	  1  de julio de  2021 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Releases Section 353 List of Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors for Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report	  July 1, 2021 

previous page1…45678…14next page

Back to Top
#### § 598.803 Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, the Presidential Memorandum of May 15, 2015: Delegation of Functions Under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, or the Presidential Memorandum of May 31, 2013: Delegation of Functions Under Subsection 804(h)(2)(A) of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act may be taken by the Director of the OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.

[86 FR 26671, May 17, 2021]
#### § 137.366 May the Secretary conduct onsite project oversight visits?

Yes, the Secretary may conduct onsite project oversight visits semiannually or on an alternate schedule negotiated in the construction project agreement. The Secretary must provide the Self-Governance Tribe with reasonable advance written notice to assist the Self-Governance Tribe in coordinating the visit. The purpose of the visit is review the progress under the construction project agreement. At the request of the Self-Governance Tribe, the Secretary must provide the Self-Governance Tribe a written site visit report.
Exhibit 32.1

ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”), I, F. Peter Cuneo, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ F. Peter Cuneo              |
|---------------------------------|
| F. Peter Cuneo                  |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |

Date: August 26, 2015
# C_2005274EN.01002401.xml

| 5.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/24

---

Amendment to the notice of invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries

(
  Official Journal of the European Union, C 166 of 7 July 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union, C 166 of 7 July 2005

(2005/C 274/09)

Page 54, the text of point 2, under heading I ‘Subject’, reads as follows:

‘The total quantity in respect of which there may be fixed a maximum export refund as provided in Article 4(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 (1), is approximately 4 000 000 tonnes.’.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

1

---
#### § 401.152 Court review.

Where the Administrator upon review affirms the denial of a request for records, in whole or in part, the requester may seek court review in the district court of the United States pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).
#### Green *v.*Hallowell.

Where the rules of court require two consecutive rules to plead to be taken to entitle the plaintiff to enter judgment by default, the plaintiff cannot take judgment by default on one rule.

After appeal from an award, a judgment in default of a plea may be entered for the amount found by the award, without a writ of inquiry, &e.

In error from the Common Pleas of Union.

*July*21. Assumpsit against three. Award filed, finding a sum due by two. One of the defendants appealed. The judgment was entered against him under the circumstances stated in the opinion of this court.

Miller, for plaintiff in error.

*Woods,*contra.

*July*31.

Burnside, J.

The first error assigned is, to the court entering judgment against Robert B. Green, for want of a plea. It is true that in assumpsit against several, if some are served with process and appear and plead to issue, and some who are served malie default, the plaintiff takes judgment by default against the latter: Ridgely *v.*Dobson, 3 W. & S. 118. But in such case the judgment must be taken in accordance with the rules of court. Here a rule was obtained at September Term, 1846, to plead. On the 26th December, 1846, on motion judgment against Robert B. Green for the sum of $131.25, for want of a plea. The rule of court is, that *“*a rule to make defence or plea at least twenty days before the next preceding term is of course, and on failure of the defendant so doing, the plaintiff may, in like manner, within twenty days, enter a second rule to make defence, or plead,” &c. The plaintiff had no right to have a judgment until after his general rule.

The second error assigned is, to the court entering judgment against R. B. Green for $131.25, on motion, without the aid of a jury to assess the damages, it being an action of assumpsit.

In this case there had been a rule of defence under the compul*54sory arbitration act, and an award for plaintiff for $ 131.25. Tbe judgment was only entered for the amount of the award. In such a case we all think there was no error. When a cause is referred and the award appealed from, and the defendant declines to plead, a judgment may be taken, in accordance with the rules of court, by default, for the amount of the award, without a writ of inquiry of damages. ’ '

The judgment is reversed, and *procedendo*awarded.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: September 19, 2005


By: /S/ Randall Jones
_____________________________________
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer
# Moldova

111 items

        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Moldova	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Moldovan Prime Minister Gavrilita	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Moldovan Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 19, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Moldova	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Moldova	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Moldova, Georgia, and the United Kingdom	  May 16, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 4, 2022	  Ned PriceMay 4, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 2, 2022	  Ned PriceMay 2, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 26, 2022	  Ned PriceApril 26, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2022	  Jalina PorterApril 22, 2022 

previous page1…45678…12next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.312 Who is the proper defendant in a civil enforcement action under section 509(a)(2) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8(a)(2)]?

Only the designated Tribal certifying officer acting in his or her official capacity may be sued. Self-Governance Tribes and other Tribal officials are not proper defendants in lawsuits brought under section 509(a)(2) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8(a)(2)].
#### § 584.309 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
# Armenia

234 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien and USAID Assistant Administrator Erin McKee	  James O’BrienApril 5, 2024Brussels Hub 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024European Commission HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Media Note  		Joint U.S.-EU-Armenia High Level Meeting in Support of Armenia’s Resilience	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 28, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 11, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism	  March 9, 2024 

123…24next page

Back to Top