alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MICHAEL L. WAGNER

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 22

- 2571 (UNA)

)

UNITED STATES SOLICITOR GENERAL

, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Th is matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis (ECF No. 3) and for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the complaint (ECF No.

1) and this civil action without prejudic e.

A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a

formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch

,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

that a complaint cont ain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s

jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled

to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P . 8(a). The

purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim

being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense

, and to

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata ap plies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498

(D.D.C. 1977).2

As drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in

Rule 8(a). According to plaintiff, antibacterial soaps and chemicals in disposable diapers are

toxic , and he demands that this Court “Order a Total

- Ban of Antibacterial Soap and Disposable

Diapers containing dangerous chemicals.” Compl. at 1. Missing from the complaint i s a short

and plain statement of a viable legal claim for relief this Court may order. Therefore, the Court

will dismiss the complaint and this civil action w ithout prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: J anuary 19, 2023 /s/

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of InMedica  Development  Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of
the  Company on Form 10QSB for the quarter  ended June 30,  2005 fully  complies
with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the  information  contained  in such  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition of the Company at the end of such
periods and the results of operations of the Company for such periods.


/s/ Ralph Henson
Ralph Henson,
 Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2005


/s/ Richard Bruggeman
Richard Bruggeman,
 Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005











                                       19
HomeNew Zealand

# New Zealand

119 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Prime Minister Hipkins of New Zealand	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Jenny Taft of Fox Sports	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 26, 2023Wellington, New Zealand 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The United States-New Zealand Relationship	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield to Travel to New Zealand	  July 21, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Tonga, New Zealand, and Australia, July 24-29	   
        -    Special Briefing  		State Department Officials on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Tonga, New Zealand, and Australia	  July 20, 2023Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Trip to Tonga, New Zealand, and Australia	  Matthew MillerJuly 20, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with NSC Senior Director for Europe Amanda Sloat and Ambassador Julianne Smith, U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO	  July 7, 2023Brussels Media Hub 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: New Zealand	  June 15, 2023 

previous page12345…12next page

Back to Top
#### § 136.114 Applicability of other Department regulations.

Several other regulations apply to grants under this subpart. These include to the extent applicable but are not limited to:

42 CFR part 50, subpart D, Public Health Service grant appeals procedure

45 CFR part 16, Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board

45 CFR part 75—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards

45 CFR part 84, Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance

45 CFR part 86, Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance

45 CFR part 91, Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance

Note:

To the extent they provide special benefits to Indians, grants under this subpart are exempted from the requirements of section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 200d], prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin, by regulation at 45 CFR 80.3(d) which provides, with respect to Indian health services, that, “An individual shall not be deemed subjected to discrimination by reasons of his exclusion from the benefits of a program limited by Federal law to individuals of a particular race, color, or national origin different from his.

[50 FR 1854, Jan. 14, 1985, as amended at 81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
In-Person Attendees: The Portable Air Conditioners Test Procedures Meeting Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Aloisi, Alberto Group Product Compliance

and Regulatory Affairs Manager DeLonghi Group Via L. Seitz, 47 Treviso N/A 31100 Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585-0121 Berringer, Bryan Lead Mechanical Engineer Department of Energy (DOE) Office of the Building Technologies Program 1000 Independence Avenue SW Mailstop EE-2J WashingtonDC 20585 Besant, Martin L. Product and Safety EngineerElectrolux Major Appliances North America 521 Chelsea Rd. Aberdeen MD 21001 Brookman, DouglasFacilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228 Butler, Sarah GC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Chun Chun, Ni N/A Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)One Cyclotron Road, MS:90R4000 University of California Berkeley CA 94720-8136 Cleary, Jennifer Director, Regulatory Affairs Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) 1111 19th Street, NW, Suite 402 WashingtonDC 20036 Crawford, Jim HVAC Regulatory ConsultantN/A 713 WSW Loop 323, PMB 123 Tyler TX 75701 Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations

Research Analyst U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585 Dunham, Camila Program Manager Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)One Cyclotron Road, Mail Stop: 90R4000 Berkeley CA 94720 Hodges, John Attorney at Law Wiley Rein 1776 K Street, NW WashingtonDC 20006 Lee, Sang Product Manager Denso Products and Sevices Americas, Inc. 3900 Via Oro Avenue Long BeachCA 90810 Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy

Coordinator Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP) 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600 WashingtonDC 20045 Prager, Mike Presidnet and CEO DeLonghi Group 2 Park Way & Route 17, South, Suite 3A Upper Saddle River NJ 07458 Reich, Judith Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington MA 01803 Singerman, Nadav N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, NW, Suite 500 WashingtonDC 20006-1301 Vit, Stefano Regulatory Affairs and

Standartization HVAC DeLonghi Group Via L Seiltz 47 Treviso N/A 31100In-Person Attendees: The Portable Air Conditioners Test Procedures Meeting Meeting Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Watson, Troy Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, Suite 500 WashingtonDC 20006-1301
# C_2005330EN.01001701.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/17

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Herrero Romeu v Commission

(Case T-298/02) (1)

1

(Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Work done for another State - Meaning of habitual residence - Statement of grounds - Principle of equal treatment)

(2005/C 330/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Anna Herrero Romeu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, J. Guillem Carrau, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent, and by J. Rivas-Andrés and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert, lawyers)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of the Commission's decision of 10 June 2002 refusing to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the allowances associated therewith

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

1

---
Document

Exhibit 10.42

Amendment No. 1 to                
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), signed on the date set forth on the signature page, is between Twin River Worldwide Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Marc Crisafulli (“Executive” and, together with the Company, the “Parties”).


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement on February 21, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Initial Term to December 31, 2021 and make another change which flows therefrom.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
    “2.  TERM.  The initial term of employment under this Agreement will begin on the Effective Date and will continue until December 31, 2021, subject to prior termination in accordance with the terms hereof (the “Initial Term”).  The Initial Term will be automatically extended for successive additional terms of one year first commencing on the day immediately following each December 31st beginning December 31, 2021 (each such period, an “Additional Term”), and subsequently on each annual anniversary of the end of an Additional Term, unless either Party gives written notice to the other Party of non-extension at least 60 days prior to the end of the Initial Term or to the end of the then-applicable Additional Term (the Initial Term and any Additional Term(s), collectively, the “Term”).”
2.    Section 3(e) of the Agreement is added to read in its entirety as follows:
    “(e)  In addition, Executive will be eligible to receive a special one-time bonus upon successful resolution of the Rhode Island Master Contract issue at the discretion of the Committee.  In determining the amount of the bonus, if any, the Committee may consider many factors including the value created for the Company and Executive’s performance against previously-established Company objectives relating to Rhode Island.  No portion of this compensation shall relate to the outcome of lobbying activities.”
3.    Terms used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Agreement are used herein as so defined.  Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the respective dates set forth below.










TWIN RIVER WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS


						
	By:	/s/ Craig Eaton
	Name:	Craig Eaton
	Title:	Executive Vice President and General
		Counsel
		
	Date signed:	1/16/2020
		
		/s/ Marc Crisafulli
	Name:	Marc Crisafulli
		
	Date signed:	1/16/2020


2
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3029

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse in

Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.Washington, District of Columbia, as the ‘‘E.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3029

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse in Washington,

District of Columbia, as the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3029 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

2 The United States courthouse located at 3rd Street

3 and Constitution Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, Dis4 trict of Columbia, shall be designated and known as the

5 ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United

11 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 551.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 551.507(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 551.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) Email (preferred method): *OFAC.Regulations.Reports@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) U.S. mail: OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-192/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation in Lagardère Active Broadcast v Société pour la perception de la rémunération équitable (SPRE) and Others (1)

(Copyright and neighbouring rights - Broadcasting of phonograms - Equitable remuneration)

(2005/C 217/37)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-192/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Cour de cassation (France), made by decision of 17 February 2004, received at the Court on 26 April 2004, in the proceedings between Lagardère Active Broadcast (the successor in title to Europe 1 communication SA) and Société pour la perception de la rémunération équitable (SPRE) and Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten mbH (GVL); third party: Compagnie européenne de radiodiffusion et de télévision Europe 1 SA (CERT) — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet, S. von Bahr, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur) and U. Lõhmus, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it ruled:

----

(1)OJ C 156 of 12. 06.2004.

----
§ 110.32 Benefits for lost employment income. ( a ) Requesters who are determined to be eligible for Program benefits as injured countermeasure recipients may be able to receive benefits for loss of employment income incurred as a result of a covered injury (or its health complications, as described in § 110.31(b)). Compensation for lost wages is paid as a percentage of the amount of employment income earned at the time of injury and lost as the result of the covered injury or its health complications. The period of time requested for lost employment income benefits must be supported by the severity of the covered injury as demonstrated by the medical and employment records.
( b ) The method and amount of benefits for lost employment income are described in § 110.81. Benefits for lost employment income will be adjusted if there are fewer than ten days of lost employment income. Pursuant to law, and as described in § 110.81, benefits provided for lost employment income may also be adjusted for annual and lifetime caps. Payment of benefits for lost employment income is secondary to any obligation of any third-party payer to pay for lost employment income or to provide disability or retirement benefits to the requester. It is the obligation of requesters to follow all specified procedures to apply for and acquire third-party benefits. The Secretary has the discretion to disapprove lost employment income benefits if the requester fails to do so. As provided in § 110.84, the Secretary reserves the right to recover lost employment income benefits paid by the Program to requesters if third-party payers are obligated to provide those benefits.
( c ) The Secretary does not require an individual to use paid leave (*e.g.,* sick leave or vacation leave) for lost work days. However, if an individual uses paid leave for lost work days, the Secretary will not consider those days to be days of lost employment income unless the individual reimburses the employer for the paid leave taken and the employer restores the leave that was used. This puts the individual back in the same position as if he or she had not used paid leave for the lost work days.
( d ) The Secretary may pay benefits for lost employment income to the estate of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient as long as such benefits were accrued during the deceased injured countermeasure recipient's lifetime as the result of a covered injury or its health complications, and were not paid in full by the Program before the deceased injured countermeasure recipient died. However, no such lost employment income may be paid after the receipt, by the survivor or survivors of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient, of death benefits under § 110.82.
HomeCosta Rica

# Costa Rica

135 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Enhancing Digital Economy Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		San Jose, Costa Rica: Lincoln School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Costa Rica	  April 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Travels to Colombia and Costa Rica for the Launch of Three Climate Entrepreneurship Hubs	  April 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas Advances Through a Second Annual High-level Meeting in the Dominican Republic	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas High-level Meeting Outcomes for 2024	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to the Dominican Republic	  March 10, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		San Jose, Costa Rica: The American International School of Costa Rica: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Announces 2024 Spring Season of Next Level	  February 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Toloui to Travel to Costa Rica for Americas Partnership Semiconductor Workforce Symposium	  January 24, 2024 

123…14next page

Back to Top
# Romania

148 items

        -    Report  		Romania	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Romania	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Romania	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Romania	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Romania	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (17-1108) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime	  November 8, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (17-828) – Arrangement Regarding Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  August 28, 2017 
        -    Report  		Romania	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Romania	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Romania	  June 27, 2017 

previous page1…101112131415next page

Back to Top
# C_2005217EN.01004202.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/42

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 June 2005

in Case T-349/04 Parfümerie Douglas GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Removal of the earlier mark from the register - No need to adjudicate)

(2005/C 217/93)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-349/04: Parfümerie Douglas GmbH, established in Hagen (Germany), represented by C. Schumann, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: A. von Mühlendahl), the other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal having been Jürgen Heinz Douglas, residing in Hamburg (Germany) — action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 May 2004 (Case R 795/2002-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Parfümerie Douglas GmbH and Jürgen Heinz Douglas — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

1

---