alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 137.441 Will there be a hearing? Yes, unless the Self-Governance Tribe waives its right to a hearing in writing. The Deputy Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals must appoint an Administrative Law Judge to hold a hearing, ( a ) The hearing must be held within 10 days of the date of the notice referred to in § 137.440 unless the Self-Governance Tribe agrees to a later date.
( b ) If possible, the hearing will be held at the office of the Self-Governance Tribe. If the hearing is held more than 50 miles from the office of the Self-Governance Tribe, the Secretary must arrange to pay transportation costs and per diem for incidental expenses. This will allow for adequate representation of the Self-Governance Tribe.
#### § 137.379 Do Davis-Bacon wage rates apply to construction projects performed by Self-Governance Tribes using Federal funds?

Davis-Bacon Act wage rates only apply to laborers and mechanics employed by the contractors and subcontractors (excluding Indian Tribes, inter-Tribal consortia, and Tribal organizations) retained by Self-Governance Tribes to perform construction. The Davis-Bacon Act and wage rates do not apply when Self-Governance Tribes perform work with their own employees.
No. 74-1103.

#### Estelle, Corrections Director *v.*Johnson.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice White would grant certiorari. Reported below: 506 F. 2d 347.
#### § 1003.1310 Amount of penalties.

The OIG may impose a penalty of not more than $2,000 for each individual violation of § 1003.1300.

[81 FR 88362, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42841, July 3, 2023]
§ 802.227 Military installation. The term *military installation* means any site that meets the following category descriptions, as identified in the list at appendix A to this part: ( a ) Active Air Force ballistic missile fields;
( b ) Air Force bases administering active Air Force ballistic missile fields;
( c ) Air Force bases and major annexes thereof containing a unit from the Air Force Air Combat Command;
( d ) Air Force bases and major annexes thereof containing an Air Force research laboratory or test unit and associated sites;
( e ) Air Force bases and major annexes thereof containing a unit of the North American Aerospace Defense Command and its regions;
( f ) Air Force bases and Air Force stations and major annexes thereof containing satellite, telemetry, tracking, or commanding systems;
( g ) Army bases, ammunition plants, centers of excellence and research laboratories and major annexes thereof, excluding depots, arsenals, and airfields that are not collocated with an Army installation included in this section;
( h ) Army combat training centers located in the continental United States;
( i ) Headquarters of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and major offices and annexes thereof;
( j ) Long range radar sites and major annexes thereof in any of the following states: Alaska, North Dakota, California, or Massachusetts;
( k ) Major range and test facility base activities as defined in 10 U.S.C. 196;
( l ) Marine Corps bases and air stations and major annexes thereof, excluding detachments, installations, logistics battalions, recruit depots, and support facilities;
( m ) Military ranges as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(e)(1) owned by the Navy or Air Force, or joint forces training centers that are located in any of the following states: Arizona, California, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, or Wisconsin;
( n ) Naval bases and air stations containing squadrons and supporting commands of the Submarine Force Atlantic or Submarine Force Pacific and major offices thereof;
( o ) Naval surface, air, and undersea warfare centers and research laboratories and major annexes thereof; and
( p ) Navy off-shore range complexes and off-shore operating areas.
{85 FR 3166, Jan. 17, 2020, as amended at 88 FR 57350, Aug. 23, 2023]
HomeSecurity...Countering Threats

# 									Countering Threats							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

The Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) uses counterintelligence, training, information distribution, and rewards to deter, detect, and neutralize threats to the State Department and related U.S. interests.

## Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST)

The FEST is the U.S. government’s only interagency, on-call, short-notice team that can rapidly respond to critical incidents worldwide.

Read More

----

## Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA)

The Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA) program provides U.S. government antiterrorism training and equipment to law enforcement agencies of partner nations throughout the world.

Read More

----

## Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC)

Created in 1985, the Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) promotes security cooperation between the State Department and U.S. private sector interests around the world.

Read More

----

## Counterintelligence Investigations

DSS runs a robust counterintelligence program designed to deter, detect, and neutralize the efforts of foreign intelligence services targeting State Department personnel, facilities, and diplomatic missions worldwide.

Read More

----

## Cyber Threat and Investigations

DSS’s Cyber Threat and Investigations office enhances the State Department’s cyber security and investigative programs.

Read More

----

## Rewards for Justice

The 1984 Act to Combat International Terrorism established Rewards for Justice (RFJ), the State Department’s counterterrorism rewards program. DSS administers the program, and RFJ’s goal is to bring international terrorists to justice, identify and locate key terrorist leaders, disrupt terrorist financing, and prevent terrorist incidents against U.S. persons or property.

Read More

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Real Estate Associates Limited V (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 31, 2008   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March
	31, 2008  





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
699 A.2d 709

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Joseph P. KERRIGAN, Respondent.

No. 193 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1997, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 23,1997, it is hereby

ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of eighteen (18) months, retroactive to April 24, 1996, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                          PFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Emclaire  Financial  Corp.  (the
Corporation)  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here (the Report),  I, Shelly L.
Rhoades, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Corporation.



/s/  Shelly L. Rhoades
----------------------
Shelly L. Rhoades
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

August 13, 2004
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of the Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund

# Office of the Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund

## 				Our Mission			

					The Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund, established in 1994, allows the U.S. government to respond rapidly to high priority nonproliferation and disarmament opportunities, which are unanticipated or unusually difficult. The NDF maintains expertise in policy development, negotiations, program management, financial operations, and contract administration to ensure the work is accomplished in the most secure, safe, and cost-efficient manner possible.				

Back to Top
IB

House Calendar No. 153

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689

[Report No. 104–410]

To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301 West Main Street

in Benton, Illinois, as the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301

West Main Street in Benton, Illinois, as the ‘‘James

L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Courthouse located at 301 West

5 Main Street in Benton, Illinois, shall be known and des-
2

•HR 2689 RH

1 ignated as the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Court2 house’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

6 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

7 to the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 153

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689

[Report No. 104–410]

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse located

D

Courthouse’’.the ‘‘James L. Foreman United Statesat 301 West Main Street in Benton, Illinois, as

ECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
§ 136.22 Establishment of contract health service delivery areas. ( a ) In accordance with the congressional intention that funds appropriated for the general support of the health program of the Indian Health Service be used to provide health services for Indians who live on or near Indian reservations, contract health service delivery areas are established as follows: ( 1 ) The State of Alaska;
( 2 ) The State of Nevada;
( 3 ) the State of Oklahoma;
( 4 ) Chippewa, Mackinac, Luce, Alger, Schoolcraft, Delta, and Marquette Counties in the State of Michigan;
( 5 ) Clark, Eau Claire, Jackson, La Crosse, Monroe, Vernon, Crawford, Shawano, Marathon, Wood, Juneau, Adams, Columbia, and Sauk Counties in the State of Wisconsin and Houston County in the State of Minnesota;
( 6 ) With respect to all other reservations within the funded scope of the Indian health program, the contract health services delivery area shall consist of a county which includes all or part of a reservation, and any county or counties which have a common boundary with the reservation.
( b ) The Secretary may from time to time, redesignate areas or communities within the United States as appropriate for inclusion or exclusion from a contract health service delivery area after consultation with the tribal governing body or bodies on those reservations included within the contract health service delivery area. The Secretary will take the following criteria into consideration: ( 1 ) The number of Indians residing in the area proposed to be so included or excluded;
( 2 ) Whether the tribal governing body has determined that Indians residing in the area near the reservation are socially and economically affiliated with the tribe;
( 3 ) The geographic proximity to the reservation of the area whose inclusion or exclusion is being considered; and
( 4 ) The level of funding which would be available for the provision of contract health services.
( c ) Any redesignation under paragraph (b) of this section shall be made in accordance with the procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           13037
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     135898
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           17584
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             17599
<LOANS>                                         205116
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  384599
<DEPOSITS>                                      261717
<SHORT-TERM>                                     74762
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1755
<LONG-TERM>                                      16989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1057
<OTHER-SE>                                       28319
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  384599
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9197
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4517
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 13714
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4880
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6643
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7071
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      355
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 352
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4016
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2985
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.47
<LOANS-NON>                                        443
<LOANS-PAST>                                       211
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    806
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3153
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       44
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3474
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3474
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2592
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ester (sic) MUNCASTER.

No. 55324.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1974.

In re: Ester Muncaster applying for Writ of Certiorari.

Writ denied. As to bail we find no abuse of discretion. The other issues must first be asserted in the trial court.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Ana Gabriela Rubio Zea (Captured)

# 									Ana Gabriela Rubio Zea (Captured)							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.  The Chapitos and their confederates use various means to purchase fentanyl precursor chemicals from chemical and pharmaceutical companies in the People’s Republic Of China, including using brokers in other countries to purchase the precursor chemicals from those companies on the Cartel’s behalf.

Ana Gabriela Rubio Zea, a/k/a “Gaby,” based in Guatemala, is a broker who works with the Cartel (among other traffickers).  Rubio Zea uses her connections to People’s Republic of China based suppliers and chemical manufacturers to procure fentanyl precursor chemicals for the Cartel. Additionally, she putstraffickers in touch directly with those People’s Republic of China based suppliers, knowing that these chemicals will be used to manufacture fentanyl for ultimate distribution in the U.S. and elsewhere.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) returned an indictment against Ana Gabriela Rubio Zea and others charging them with Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

On March 17, 2023, Rubio Zea was arrested in Guatemala City, Guatemala, based on a provisional arrest warrant associated with charges in the anticipated April 4, 2023 indictment.  Rubio Zea remains in custody pending her extradition to the U.S..

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the conviction of Ana Gabriela Rubio Zea.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingGuatemalaMexico

Back to Top
#### Capital Transportation Company *v.*Mathews.

4-9566

242 S. W. 2d 836

Opinion delivered October 22, 1951.

*Bailey & Warren,*for appellant.

*J. R. Booker*and *L. A. Hardin,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, J.

Tbis is a suit for personal injuries sustained by tbe appellee while attempting to alight from a city bus operated by tbe appellant in Little Rock. In tbe court below tbe appellee obtained a verdict and judgment for $2,000.

Both as to tbe facts and as to tbe law tbe case is in all material respects similar to *Capital Transportation Co.*v. *Alexander, ante,*p. 419, 242 S. W. 2d 843, also decided today. In tbe case at bar the accident happened in the same manner as that in the other case. Tbe two trials were only a week apart. Tbe attorneys in tbe earlier case participated in tbis one, offered tbe same instructions, and now urge tbe same grounds for affirmance or reversal. Since tbis case is completely controlled by tbe other opin*441ion we see no need for repeating the reasons for our conclusions.

Affirmed.

Ward, J.,

concurs because the instruction concerning the use of hand supports, which was refused in the *'Alexander*case, was given in this case.
§ 1006.2 Contents of subpoena. A subpoena issued under this part will— ( a ) State the name of the individual or entity to whom the subpoena is addressed;
( b ) State the statutory authority for the subpoena;
( c ) Indicate the date, time and place that the investigational inquiry at which the witness is to testify will take place;
( d ) Include a reasonably specific description of any documents or items required to be produced; and
( e ) If the subpoena is addressed to an entity, describe with reasonable particularity the subject matter on which testimony is required. In such event, the named entity will designate one or more individuals who will testify on its behalf, and will state as to each individual so designated that individual's name and address and the matters on which he or she will testify. The individual so designated will testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the entity.
#### Ex Parte Cary HAWKINS. (Re: Cary Hawkins v. State of Alabama).

80-36.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
# C_2005205EN.01002202.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/22

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 25 May 2005

in Case T-330/04 Jörg-Michael Fetzer v European Parliament (1)

1

(Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Expiry of the period for bringing an action - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2005/C 205/40)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-330/04: Jörg-Michael Fetzer, residing in Tübingen (Germany), represented by M. Bauer, lawyer, against European Parliament (Agents: N. Lorenz and L.G. Knudsen, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the decision of the Selection Board for Competition PE/96/A not to include the applicant on the reserve list of that competition and, in the alternative, for an order requiring the defendant to pay appropriate damages — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J. Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 25 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
HomeGeorgia

# Georgia

164 items

        -    Press Statement  		Marking Fifteen Years Since Russia’s Invasion and Occupation of Georgia	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 31, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 31, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 26, 2023	  Vedant PatelJuly 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 24, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 24, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 12, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerJune 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Georgia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 5, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Georgia National Day 2023	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 26, 2023 

previous page1…34567…17next page

Back to Top