alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 21.52 Waiver of entrance qualifications for original appointment in time of war or national emergency.

If, in time of war or national emergency proclaimed by the President, the Secretary determines that there is need for commissioned personnel to meet the needs of the Service, other than persons eligible for examination for original appointment under the eligibility requirements prescribed in this subpart, he may prescribe standards of eligibility for examination for the original appointment of officers in the Reserve Corps without regard to such eligibility requirements. Such standards shall, however, authorize the examination only of candidates with specialized experience in administration or management or candidates with training or experience in fields relating to public health. The permanent grade of an officer who becomes eligible for examination for appointment pursuant to such standards and who becomes eligible for appointment after passage of an examination shall be limited to the junior assistant or the assistant grade, except that, if upon examination a candidate is found to be exceptionally qualified for the performance of highly specialized duties with the Service pursuant to § 21.55, he may be recommended for appointment to any grade up to and including the director grade.

[21 FR 9806, Dec. 12, 1956, as amended at 24 FR 1790, Mar. 12, 1959]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q of APL
Limited for the quarter ended September 19, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-19-1997
<CASH>                                         299,539
<SECURITIES>                                    57,472
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,318<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               688,239
<PP&E>                                       1,912,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 841,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,901,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          420,548
<BONDS>                                        681,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,879
<OTHER-SE>                                     483,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,901,563
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,958,753
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,925,007<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<FN>
<F1>The allowance for Doubtful Accounts, included in Receivables, amounted to
$15,681 at September 19, 1997.
<F2>The Provision for Doubtful Accounts, included in Total Costs, amounted to
$(597) for the 38 week period ended September 19, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22
- 0 496 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MERLE RAYMOND BRANSTETTER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER**
Pursuant to Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the reply brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until January 2 , 202 4 , to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 19 2023

11/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0496
§ 405.1062 Applicability of local coverage determinations and other policies not binding on the ALJ or attorney adjudicator and Council. ( a ) ALJs and attorney adjudicators and the Council are not bound by LCDs, LMRPs, or CMS program guidance, such as program memoranda and manual instructions, but will give substantial deference to these policies if they are applicable to a particular case.
( b ) If an ALJ or attorney adjudicator or Council declines to follow a policy in a particular case, the ALJ or attorney adjudicator or Council decision must explain the reasons why the policy was not followed. An ALJ or attorney adjudicator or Council decision to disregard such policy applies only to the specific claim being considered and does not have precedential effect.
( c ) An ALJ or attorney adjudicator or the Council may not set aside or review the validity of an LMRP or LCD for purposes of a claim appeal. An ALJ or the DAB may review or set aside an LCD (or any part of an LMRP that constitutes an LCD) in accordance with part 426 of this title.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5121, Jan. 17, 2017]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Active Shooter Full-Scale Exercise

# 									Department of State Active Shooter Full-Scale Exercise							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 27, 2023

The U.S. Department of State will hold a full-scale active shooter training exercise on September 28, 2023, between the hours of 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM.  It will take place in and around the area of the Harry S. Truman Building, located at 2201 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. The exercise will include participation by the Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Protective Service, U.S. Park Police, the District of Columbia’s Metropolitan Police Department, Fire and Emergency Services Department, and Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency.

During the exercise, those in the vicinity of the Harry S. Truman Building should expect to see law enforcement, fire and emergency medical services personnel, and participants with mock injuries responding to a simulated active shooter emergency.

This exercise allows first responders from several local and federal agencies to practice together, assess their emergency response procedures, and cement strong operational relationships among federal and local partners.

*Due to the sensitive nature of the exercise, it will be closed to the media.*

For media inquiries, please contact: DS-Press@state.gov or submit them via the web form located on the ‘Information for Journalists’ page on www.state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic SecurityDiplomatic SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
#### § 560.411 [Reserved]
HomeThe Gambia

# The Gambia

59 items

        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Hussain Travels to Morocco, The Gambia, and Senegal	  November 28, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Ambassador-at-Large Beth Van Schaack’s Remarks to the Case Western Reserve University School of Law: "International Law & The New Cold War"	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 30, 2022Case Western Reserve University School of LawCleveland, Ohio 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: The Gambia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: The Gambia	  July 19, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		The Gambia (22-629.1) – Millennium Challenge Corporation Threshold Program Grant Agreement	  June 29, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: The Gambia	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: The Gambia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		The Gambia’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 18, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations with The Gambia	  February 6, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Presidential Election in The Gambia	  Ned PriceDecember 7, 2021 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.308 Does the Secretary have any enforcement authority for Federal environmental responsibilities assumed by Tribes under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8]?

No, the Secretary does not have any enforcement authority for Federal environmental responsibilities assumed by Tribes under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8].
#### § 405.209 Payment for a Category B (Nonexperimental/investigational) device.

Payment under Medicare for a Category B (Nonexperimental/investigational) device is based on, and may not exceed, the amount that would have been paid for a currently used device serving the same medical purpose that has been approved or cleared for marketing by the FDA.

[78 FR 74809, Dec. 10, 2013]
HomeEswatini

# Eswatini

52 items

        -    TIAS  		Eswatini (09-724.1) – Defense Agreement Regarding the Status of United States Personnel Who May Be Temporarily Present in Swaziland	  July 24, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Eswatini (06-920) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  September 20, 2006 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
§ 588.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 588.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note 1 to § 588.504 .
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 588.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
HomeAustralia

# Australia

276 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Finkenauer’s Travel to Australia and New Zealand	  November 7, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a State Luncheon in Honor of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 26, 2023Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Signing Ceremony for the U.S.-Australia Technology Safeguards Agreement	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 26, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Australia Technology Safeguards Agreement (TSA)	  October 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Australia Technology Safeguards Agreement	  October 26, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Preview of Australian Prime Minister Albanese Official Visit with State Dinner to the United States	  October 24, 2023Tuesday, October 24, 2023, 12:15pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Australia, New Caledonia, and Fiji	  October 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Allen Travels to Fiji, Vanuatu, Australia, and Chile	  October 11, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		October 10 briefing with Ambassador Julianne Smith, U.S. Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)	  October 10, 2023Brussels Media Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 

previous page123456…28next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 304 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 304

  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Environmental Protection 
  Agency from promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan prior to the 
disapproval of State implementation plan revisions required pursuant to 
     the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Kim (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Cox, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Doolittle, 
 Mr. Packard, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Royce, Mr. Cunningham, and Mr. Dreier) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Environmental Protection 
  Agency from promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan prior to the 
disapproval of State implementation plan revisions required pursuant to 
     the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.

    Section 110(n) of the Clean Air Act is amended by adding the 
following new paragraph at the end thereof:
            ``(4) Prohibition of fips prior to disapproval of state 
        plans.--Until the Administrator has disapproved State 
        implementation plan revisions submitted in accordance with the 
        amendments made to this Act by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 
        1990 (Public Law 101-549), nothing in this section or in any 
        other provision of this Act shall be construed to authorize or 
        require the Administrator to promulgate or enforce an 
        applicable implementation plan (or portion thereof) pursuant to 
        any court order or settlement to the extent that such court 
        order or settlement is based upon requirements in effect under 
        this Act prior to the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments 
        of 1990 (Public Law 101-549).''.
                                 <all>
```
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Contact Us
- Events

HomeBureaus & Offices > Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources...Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

# Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

## 				OSDBU Mission			

					The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) works with industry partners, the acquisition corps, and program offices to maximize prime and subcontracting opportunities for U.S. Small Businesses. Our efforts help maintain a viable and innovative industrial base, promote worldwide economic development, and support mission critical functions for every bureau within the Department of State.				

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,017
<SECURITIES>                                     5,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,259
<PP&E>                                          29,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,727
<BONDS>                                            100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,165
<SALES>                                         15,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,302
<CGS>                                            6,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,046
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83


</TABLE>
# Namibia

55 items

        -    Report  		Namibia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		Evaluation of the United States-Africa Clean Energy Finance Initiative (US-ACEF)	   
        -    		2009 Final Communique Plenary Session Windhoek	  November 5, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Namibia (09-916) – Millennium Challenge Compact	  September 16, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Namibia (12886) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  October 8, 1997 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose
of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

         In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.




March 31, 2006                                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
--------------                                   --------------------
     Date                                        Joseph M. Jayson
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose
of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

         In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Partnership.




 March 28, 2008                               /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
 --------------                               --------------------
      Date                                    Joseph M. Jayson
                                              Individual General Partner and
                                              Principal Financial Officer
#### James WESTLEY, Appellant, v. Melody WESTLEY, Appellee.

No. 80-2182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1981.

Lawrence B. Friedman and Robert F. Tacher, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Leonard Frishman and Henry M. Cain, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 61.1306(5), 61.1308(1), 61.1318(1), Fla.Stat. (1979).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Darrel RUTLEDGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-10528.

D.C. No. CR-99-40033-CW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 21, 2001.

Before LEAYY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Eugene Darrel Rutledge appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Rutledge’s counsel has filed a brief, pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Rutledge has filed a supplemental pro se brief, contending that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel, and that the district court erred in sentencing him. Because the record on appeal is inadequate, we decline to entertain Rutledge’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim at this time. *United States v. Rivera-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057, 1060 (9th Cir.2000). Rutledge’s alleged sentencing errors are without merit.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. We therefore, AFFIRM the judgment.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.