alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeEgypt

# Egypt

262 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  April 12, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Alexandria, Egypt: Schutz American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Abstention from UN Security Council Resolution on Gaza	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 21, 2024Four Seasons HotelCairo, Egypt 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Egyptian President El-Sisi	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for Sudan Perriello Travels to Uganda, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Kenya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 27, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Cairo, Egypt: Cairo American College: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 23, 2024 

123…27next page

Back to Top
§ 136.12 Persons to whom services will be provided. ( a ) *In general.* Services will be made available, as medically indicated, to persons of Indian descent belonging to the Indian community served by the local facilities and program. Services will also be made available, as medically indicated, to a non-Indian woman pregnant with an eligible Indian's child but only during the period of her pregnancy through postpartum (generally about 6 weeks after delivery). In cases where the woman is not married to the eligible Indian under applicable state or tribal law, paternity must be acknowledged in writing by the Indian or determined by order of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Service will also provide medically indicated services to non-Indian members of an eligible Indian's household if the medical officer in charge determines that this is necessary to control acute infectious disease or a public health hazard. ( 2 ) Generally, an individual may be regarded as within the scope of the Indian health and medical service program if he/she is regarded as an Indian by the community in which he/she lives as evidenced by such factors as tribal membership, enrollment, residence on tax-exempt land, ownership of restricted property, active participation in tribal affairs, or other relevant factors in keeping with general Bureau of Indian Affairs practices in the jurisdiction.
( b ) *Doubtful cases.* ( 1 ) In case of doubt as to whether an individual applying for care is within the scope of the program, the medical officer in charge shall obtain from the appropriate BIA officials in the jurisdiction information that is pertinent to his/her determination of the individual's continuing relationship to the Indian population group served by the local program.
( 2 ) If the applicant's condition is such that immediate care and treatment are necessary, services shall be provided pending identification as an Indian beneficiary.
( c ) *Priorities when funds, facilities, or personnel are insufficient to provide the indicated volume of services.* Priorities for care and treatment, as among individuals who are within the scope of the program, will be determined on the basis of relative medical need and access to other arrangements for obtaining the necessary care.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD., L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000725266
<NAME>              NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD., L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         892,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               975,929
<PP&E>                                      10,165,114
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,311,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,905,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,620
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,331,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,905,476
<SALES>                                      1,257,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,271,531
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,110,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRANT'S CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


I, Jonathan R. Kosheff, Chief Financial Officer of Parlex Corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

      (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ending September 28,, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Dated:  November 17, 2003

/s/ Jonathan R. Kosheff
---------------------------
Jonathan R. Kosheff
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>


19


2
#### Staley Eugene BARRENTINE, Appellant, v. John Joseph MAKELY and Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 80-1746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 4, 1981.

J. Bert Grandoff and Victor J. Pellegrino of Yado, Keel, Nelson, Grandoff, Casper, Bergmann & Newcomer, P. A., Tampa, for appellant.

Barbara J. Paulson and Larry I. Gramo-vot of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P. A., Tampa, for appellees.

OTT, Judge.

It is now settled in this state that the results of a chemical test for the pres*1238ence of alcohol in the blood of a suspect, administered under section 322.261(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1975), are admissible into evidence if the suspect consented to the test. Such consent may be express or implied, but an implied consent affirmatively withdrawn before the test is administered is insufficient. *Sambrine v. State,*386 So.2d 546 (Fla.1980).

In the instant case appellee freely consented to a blood test following a vehicle accident. The results of that test were therefore admissible in this personal injury action unless barred by section 316.066(4), Florida Statutes (1971) (formerly section 317.171). Under that statute the results of a lawful blood alcohol test are inadmissible only if the test was ordered for the purpose of preparing, and the results thereof formed a basis for, the traffic accident report required by section 316.066(3). *State v. Mitchell,*245 So.2d 618, 623[3, 4] (Fla.1971).

Under the evidence presented to the trial court it is quite clear that the blood alcohol test was made and its results obtained solely in connection with possible criminal charges. The investigating officer affirmatively testified that neither the test nor its results were necessary to his accident report, albeit they were appended thereto as a subsequent supplement.

We therefore REVERSE the summary judgment of the trial court and REMAND for further proceedings.

SCHEB, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Gino Di Iorio, Chief Financial Officer of Viropro, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on 10KSB of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      Date: February 28, 2007   /s/ Gino Di Iorio _______________________  Gino Di Iorio Chief Financial Officer
HomeChile

# Chile

		Register by May 10, 2024		

118 items

        -    Direct Line Event  		Opportunity for Lithium Extraction and Value Chain Development in Chile	  May 14, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas Advances Through a Second Annual High-level Meeting in the Dominican Republic	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas High-level Meeting Outcomes for 2024	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Chile	  January 30, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Welcoming the First Subsea Cable Between South America and the Indo-Pacific Region	  January 11, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Santiago, Chile: International School Nido De Aguilas: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States-Chile Bilateral Tax Treaty Enters into Force	  December 19, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 8, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The Kremlin’s Efforts to Covertly Spread Disinformation in Latin America	  November 7, 2023 

123…12next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and their jurisdiction of corporation or organization:

|Name of Subsidiary                        | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                                          |                                              
|Southern Michigan Bank & Trust            | Michigan                                     
|                                          |                                              
|Southern Michigan Bancorp Capital Trust I | Delaware                                     
|                                          |                                              
|SMB&T Financial Services, Inc.*           | Michigan                                     
|                                          |                                              
|FNB Financial Services, Inc.*             | Michigan                                     

* Wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Michigan Bank & Trust.
#### The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Janice WALTON, Appellee.

No. 80-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 17, 1980.

High, Stack, Lazenby, Bender, Palahach & Lacasa and R. Scott Boundy, Miami, for appellant.

Rizzo & Koltun and Stewart G. Green-berg, Miami, for appellee.

*940Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

This appeal challenges an arbitration award involving uninsured motorist provisions of appellant’s insurance policy entered upon the concurrence of two arbitrators. Although he did participate in discussions1 other than those on the issue of costs, the third arbitrator did not have an opportunity to express his vote, nor did he join in the final award. We find any error which may have occurred to be harmless and affirm. *Weeki Wachee Orchid Gardens, Inc. v. Florida Inland Theaters, Inc.,*239 So.2d 602 (Fla.2d DCA 1970); §§ 682.05 and 682.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1975).

We also affirm the decision of the trial court awarding attorney’s fees to the insured. *Travelers Insurance Co. v. Horton,*366 So.2d 1204 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); *Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. v. Gonzalez,*234 So.2d 693 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); and § 627.428, Fla.Stat. (1975).

The decision of the trial court denying petition to vacate award of arbitration is affirmed.

1

. After the hearing, all discussions were conducted by individual telephone calls.
§ 597.516 Authorizing Certain Transactions in Support of Nongovernmental Organizations' Activities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the activities described in paragraph (b) of this section by a nongovernmental organization are authorized, provided that the nongovernmental organization is not a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part.
( b ) The activities referenced in paragraph (a) of this section are non-commercial activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population that fall into one of the following categories: ( 1 ) Activities to support humanitarian projects to meet basic human needs, including disaster, drought, or flood relief; food, nutrition, or medicine distribution; the provision of health services; assistance for vulnerable or displaced populations, including individuals with disabilities and the elderly; and environmental programs;
( 2 ) Activities to support democracy building, including activities to support rule of law, citizen participation, government accountability and transparency, human rights and fundamental freedoms, access to information, and civil society development projects;
( 3 ) Activities to support education, including combating illiteracy, increasing access to education, international exchanges, and assisting education reform projects;
( 4 ) Activities to support non-commercial development projects directly benefiting civilians, including those related to health, food security, and water and sanitation;
( 5 ) Activities to support environmental and natural resource protection, including the preservation and protection of threatened or endangered species, responsible and transparent management of natural resources, and the remediation of pollution or other environmental damage; and
( 6 ) Activities to support disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and conflict resolution programs.
( c ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
( d ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize nongovernmental or other entities to engage in other activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population, including support for the removal of landmines and economic development projects directly benefiting the civilian population.
Note 1 to § 597.516 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78505, Dec. 21, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Column 1 Cummulative during Inception Stage (Unaudited)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                  20,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                (20,818)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   8,458
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0               4,122,610
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             (4,131,068)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,267                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,837,618                     287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                425,767                   (287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                496,283<F2>                   0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,131,068)                   (287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)                       0
<FN>
<F1>Retained Earnings deficit.
<F2>Reduction of Payables.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005205EN.01002102.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 June 2005

in Case T-186/04 Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of Community work mark SPAFORM - Earlier word marks SPA and SPA THERMES - Partial rejection of the opposition - Rule 18(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

(2005/C 205/38)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-186/04, Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV, established in Spa (Belgium), represented by L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse and D. Moreau, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being Spaform Ltd, established in Southampton (United Kingdom), represented by J. Gardner and A. Howard, Barristers, application for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2004 (Case R 827/2002-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and Spaform Ltd — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 February 2004 (Case R 827/2002-4) in part, in so far as it declares inadmissible the opposition based on Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, as regards the SPA mark registered in Benelux under No 389 230; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 February 2004 (Case R 827/2002-4) in part, in so far as it declares inadmissible the opposition based on Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, as regards the SPA mark registered in Benelux under No 389 230;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant;

| 4. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201 of 7.8.2004

1

---
#### Ex parte D. Steven ANDERTON. (Re: D. Steven Anderton v. State of Alabama).

79-858.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1980.

ADAMS, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.