alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 802.505 Determination of whether to undertake an investigation. ( a ) After a review of a notified transaction under § 802.503, the Committee shall undertake an investigation of any transaction that it has determined to be a covered real estate transaction if: ( 1 ) A member of the Committee (other than a member designated as ex officio under section 721(k)) advises the Staff Chairperson that the member believes that the transaction threatens to impair the national security of the United States and that the threat has not been mitigated; or
( 2 ) The lead agency recommends, and the Committee concurs, that an investigation be undertaken.
( b ) The Committee shall also undertake, after a review of a covered real estate transaction under § 802.503, an investigation to determine the effects on national security of any covered real estate transaction that would result in control by a foreign person of critical infrastructure, as defined in § 800.214 of this title, of or within the United States, if the Committee determines that the transaction could impair the national security and such impairment has not been mitigated.
( c ) The Committee shall undertake an investigation as described in paragraph (b) of this section unless the Chairperson of the Committee (or the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury) and the head of any lead agency (or his or her delegee at the deputy level or equivalent) designated by the Chairperson determine on the basis of the review that the covered real estate transaction will not impair the national security of the United States.
#### Louis Schaefer, complainant, *v.*Samuel S. Metzger et al., defendants.

[Decided November 4th, 1929.]

*Mr. Harry*Levin, for the complainant.

*Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch (Mr. Harry*Kalisch, of counsel), for the defendants.

Backes, V. C.

The complainant held a mortgage on land of the defendants, Metzger and Mulman, second to one held by a building and loan association. The building and loan association also held as additional collateral to its mortgage, shares owned by the defendants in the association. The complainant fore*308closed his mortgage and bought in the property at the sale, leaving a deficiency. Then the building and loan association called its mortgage. The complainant offered to redeem but the building and loan refused to credit the amount paid on the shares, claiming that the value of the shares was not appropriable to the mortgage debt until the shares matured. *Mechanics Building and Loan Association*v. *Conover, 14 N. J. Eq. 219.*After the filing of the present bill to redeem the building and loan mortgage, the complainant paid the full amount of the mortgage, and the shares were deposited in court. Metzger and Mulman claim them. So does the complainant.

The building and loan had two securities, the complainant but one, and between them it was the complainant’s right to require the building and loan association to exhaust its collateral before resorting to the common security to pay its debt. *Herbert*v. *Mechanics Building and Loan Association, 17 N. J. Eq. 497; Phillipsburg M. L. and B. Association*v. *Hawk, 27 N. J. Eq. 355; Sudbury*v. *Merchantville Building and Loan Association, 57 N. J. Eq. 342; Halkett*v. *Young, 73 N. J. Eq. 10.*

The defendants acknowledge the principle as applicable between creditors of the same debtor, but contend that as the complainant is now the owner of the common security, the doctrine of marshaling the assets no longer obtains. The complainant is still a creditor. The deficiency upon his decree is more than double the value of the shares. By going forward with the foreclosure of his mortgage and exhausting his security, -the complainant did not prejudice his equity in the collateral and marshaling of the securities held by the senior creditor. The amount bid by him at the sale, subject to the first mortgage, fixed the value of the common security, and the sum realized under his foreclosure being insufficient to pay his debt, the collateral inured to him as creditor upon redeeming the prior mortgage. *Whittaker*v. *Belvidere Roller Mill Co., 55 N. J. Eq. 674.*The shares will be ordered delivered to the complainant.
# Zambia

80 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Zambia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Zambia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Online Briefing with Uzra Zeya, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy and Human Rights.	  Uzra ZeyaMarch 31, 2023Brussels Media Hub  
        -    Media Note  		Declaration of the Summit for Democracy	  March 29, 2023 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken’s Participation in the Second Summit for Democracy	  March 24, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		2023 Summit for Democracy: Progress in the Year of Action	  March 22, 2023Wednesday, March 22, 2023, 10:30 a.m. ETWashington D.C.  
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Dr. John Nkengasong, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy	  John N. NkengasongFebruary 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Minerals Security Partnership Governments Engage with African Countries and Issue a Statement on Principles for Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards	  February 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Releases Signed Memorandum of Understanding with the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia to Strengthen Electric Vehicle Battery Value Chain	  January 18, 2023 

previous page12345…8next page

Back to Top
# C_2005217EN.01004101.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 June 2005

in Case T-158/04 Erich Drazdansky v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark ‘UUP'S’ - Earlier national word marks UP - Dismissal of the application for restitutio in integrum (re-establishment of rights) - Article 78(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Action manifestly without legal substance)

(2005/C 217/90)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-158/04: Erich Drazdansky, residing in Wiener Neustadt (Austria), represented by A.M. Leeb, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal, and intervener before the Court of First Instance, being The Concentrate Manufacturing Company of Ireland (Seven-Up International), established in Hamilton (Bermuda), represented by M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2004 (Case R 611/2003-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Drazdansky and The Concentrate Manufacturing Company of Ireland — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217 of 28.8.2004.

1

---
#### § 802.217 Extended range.

The term *extended range* means, with respect to any military installation identified in § 802.227(h), (k), or (m), as listed in part 2 of appendix A to this part, the area that extends 99 miles outward from the outer boundary of close proximity to such military installation, but, where applicable, not exceeding the outer limit of the territorial sea of the United States.
#### § 591.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
United States Department of the Interior 

Mr. Douglas Pabst 

FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 

Boqueron Field Office 

Carr. 301, KM 5.1, Bo. Corozo 

P.O. Box 491 

Boqueron, PR 00622 

MAY 18 2005 

Team Leader, Dredged Material Management Team 

Division of Environmental Planning and Protection 

US Environmental Protection Agency, Region2 

290 Broadway 

New York, New York 10007-1866 

Dear Mr. Pabst: 

Re: Ocean dredged material disposal 

sites around Puerto Rico 

Thank you for your letter of April 22, 2005. received in this office on May 2, 2005, 

concerning the potential effect on threatened and endangered species of the above 

referenced Regulatory modification to the designation ofthe ocean dredged material 

disposal sites around Puerto Rico (at 40 CFR 228.16 ); namely Arecibo, Mayagtiez, 

Ponce, San Juan, and Yabucoa harbors, to provide flexibi lity to coastal managers in 

meeting any future dredged material management needs that may arise due to 

emergencies and/or potential future activities outside areas already provided fo r by the 

Regulations governing ocean disposal of dredged material. Our comments are issued in 

accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., as 

amended). We have assigned Identification Number FWS-MM-214-05-0628 to this 

project, and we wiil appreciaie it if yuu refet to this number ir. future corre:>por.dence 

regarding this project. 

We concur with your determination that the proposed modification may affect but is not 

likely to adversely affect threatened and endangered species, because only the same types 

of dredge material will be eligible for disposal, all disposal activities will be conducted in 

accordance with the approved Site Management and Monitoring Plan for each site, and 

there are no alterati o11s to any other requirements of the Regulations. Therefore, no 

further consultation is required. Nevertheless, if the project is modified or if infom1ation 

on impacts to listed species becomes available: this office should be contacted concerning 

the need for initiation of consultaticn under section 7 of the Act. 
Thank you fo r the opportunity to comment on this project, and please do not hesitate to 

contact Dr. Jorge E. Saliva of our staff at 787 851-7297, extension 224, should you have 

any questions or need additional info rmation. 

Jes 

cc: EPA, San Juan 

NMFS, Lajas 

EQB, San Juan 

COE, San Juan 

DNER, San Juan 

yours, 

Edw Field inSE,~ upervi~ sor
# Bolivia

64 items

        -    Report  		Bolivia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Bolivia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Bolivia (17-706) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Customs Administrations	  July 6, 2017 
        -    Report  		Bolivia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Bolivia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Bolivia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Bolivia (17-124) – Amendment and Extension for Memorandum of Understanding of December 4, 2001 Concerning Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material	  January 24, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Bolivia (07-801) – Agreement Concerning the Activities of US Civilian and Military Personnel in Bolivia	  August 1, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Bolivia (05-530) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  May 30, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Bolivia (01-1204) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian Cultures and Certain Ethnological Material from the Colonial and Republican periods of Bolivia	  December 4, 2001 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25.795-8**Date:**10/24/2008** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Interior Design to Facillitate Searches** ****Related Regulation(s):**Unknown Part**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**ANM-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
HomeSerbia

# Serbia

118 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with James O’Brien, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, And Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs	  March 22, 2024Brussels Media Hub 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Belgrade, Serbia: International School of Belgrade: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Serbia National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 15, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 25, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 25, 2024WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 18, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 18, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Serbia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Countering Corruption and Russian Malign Influence in the Western Balkans	  November 16, 2023 

123…12next page

Back to Top
H. R. 2589

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until

December 31, 1995, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–

236), as amended by Public Law 104–30, is amended by striking

‘‘November 1, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 1995’’. (b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of the author- ity provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization

Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236) prior to

November 14, 1995, the written policy justification dated June

1, 1995, and submitted to the Congress in accordance with section

583(b)(1) of such Act, and the consultations associated with such

policy justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 801.214 Unaffiliated pilot program U.S. business.

The term *unaffiliated pilot program U.S. business* means, with respect to a foreign person, a pilot program U.S. business in which that foreign person does not directly hold more than fifty percent of the outstanding voting interest or have the right to appoint more than half of the members of the board of directors or equivalent governing body.
#### Joseph R. BRIGANCE v. Clarissa J. VAXTER.

No. 51919.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 21, 1980.

William K. Duke, Omar D. Craig, Oxford, for appellant.

Mitchell, McNutt, Bush, Lagrone & Sams, Guy Mitchell, III, Tupelo, Vettra Glenn Al-derson, Oxford, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lafayette County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

REVERSED AND JUDGMENT HERE ON LIABILITY. REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL ON ISSUE OF DAMAGES ONLY. MOTION TO STRIKE STATEMENT OF FACTS OVERRULED.

PATTERSON, C. J, ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
HomeFiji

# Fiji

68 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Michael Schiffer, USAID Assistant Administrator for Asia, and Anka Lee, USAID Deputy Assistant Administrator and Senior Advisor	  August 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Fiji	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Russo Travels to Honolulu, Fiji, and New Zealand	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Dialogue in Papua New Guinea	  May 22, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Fiji	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Fiji	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Launches First Regional Summit for the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs in Kuala Lumpur	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Marking One Year Since the Release of the Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy	  February 13, 2023 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Meeting with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Defense Duale

# 									Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Meeting with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Defense Duale							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 7, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Acting Deputy Secretary of State and Under Secretary for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland met with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Defense Aden Bare Duale and reaffirmed our strong bilateral ties, ongoing collaboration on counterterrorism, and close security cooperation.  They discussed our shared interest in preventing further conflict in the East Africa Region including the multinational security mission to Somalia, and the need for inclusive peace processes.  Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland reiterated the United States’ commitment to a successful Multinational Security Support mission to Haiti and underscored the shared values that form the foundation of our partnership.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsCounterterrorismKenyaOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsPeace ProcessSecurityUnder Secretary for Political Affairs

Back to Top
#### § 137.135 May the Secretary request and obtain an extension of time of the 45 day review period?

Yes, the Secretary may request an extension of time before the expiration of the 45 day review period. The Indian Tribe may either grant or deny the Secretary's request for an extension. To be effective, any grant of extension of time must be in writing and be signed by the person authorized by the Indian Tribe to grant the extension before the expiration of the 45 day review period.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

Order 

April 26, 2018

157047

157049

NICHOLAS DAVID BURNETT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157047

COA: 338618 

Genesee CC: 14-312262-DP

TRACY LYNN AHOLA,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and

DEREK AHOLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

NICHOLAS DAVID BURNETT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157049

COA: 338618 

Genesee CC: 14-312262-DP

TRACY LYNN AHOLA,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and

DEREK AHOLA,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the December 7, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu 

of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE parts B.II. and B.III. of the Court of Appeals 

judgment and we REMAND this case to that court for further consideration. We express 

no opinion on the lower courts’ waiver analysis; however, given the unusual facts of this 

case, we believe the lower courts should address the defendants’ remaining arguments. 

Therefore, on remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals shall remand this 

case to the Genesee Circuit Court for further consideration. The trial court shall: (1) 

determine whether the defendants should be estopped from arguing that the plaintiff 

committed intrinsic fraud or fraud on the court during the proceedings under the 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 26, 2018 

d0419t

2

Clerk

Revocation of Paternity Act (ROPA), MCL 722.1431 et seq., given the entry into or 

failure to object to custody and parenting time orders with knowledge that the ROPA 

judgment was obtained through intrinsic fraud or fraud on the court; (2) conduct an 

evidentiary hearing to determine whether the plaintiff committed intrinsic fraud or fraud 

on the court during the ROPA proceedings; and (3) if so, determine to what, if any, 

remedy the defendants are entitled. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court shall 

forward the record and its findings to the Court of Appeals, which shall then rule on these 

issues.

On remand, the Genesee Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals are DIRECTED 

to expedite their consideration and resolution of this case. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
# Mauritania

68 items

        -    Report  		Mauritania	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Mauritania	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritania	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritania	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritania	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritania (05-603) – Defense Cooperation Agreement Regarding the Pan-Sahel Initiative Project	  June 6, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritania (04-0706) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  July 6, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Mauritania (03-706) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  July 6, 2003 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan R. Kosheff, Chief Financial Officer of Parlex Corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

      (a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
            ending Mar h 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 12, 2003

/s/ Jonathan R. Kosheff
- ---------------------------------
Jonathan R. Kosheff
Chief Financial Officer