alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeTibet

# Tibet

54 items

        -    DSS Articles  		DSS Foreign Service National Investigator takes self-improvement to the highest level – Mount Everest	  October 20, 2023 
        -    		Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues	  October 11, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at a Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) Hearing on China’s Global Transnational Repression Campaign	  Uzra ZeyaSeptember 12, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks on Addressing Water Security Challenges in the Himalayan Region	  Uzra ZeyaAugust 24, 2023World Water WeekStockholm, Sweden 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcement of Visa Restrictions to Address Forced Assimilation in Tibet	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 22, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Occasion of His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s 88th Birthday	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 6, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Report to Congress on Tibet Negotiations	  June 30, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: China—Tibet	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at the CECC Hearing, “Preserving Tibet: Cultural Erasure, Forced Assimilation, & Coercion of Tibetans in the U.S.”	  Uzra ZeyaMarch 28, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Supporting Tibetan Institutes Promoting Fundamental Freedoms, Human Rights, and Religious Freedom	  March 20, 2023 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
II

Calendar No. 421

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2980

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 1996

Received

MAY 9, 1996

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 23, 1996

Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

stalking.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2980 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Stalking

3 Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. PUNISHMENT OF INTERSTATE STALKING.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after section 2261 the following:

7 ‘‘§ 2261A. Interstate stalking

8 ‘‘Whoever travels across a State line or within the

9 special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United

10 States with the intent to injure or harass another person,

11 and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel places

12 that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious

13 bodily injury (as defined in section 1365(g)(3) of this title)

14 to, that person or a member of that person’s immediate

15 family (as defined in section 115 of this title) shall be pun16 ished as provided in section 2261 of this title.’’.

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

18 (1) Section 2261(b) of title 18, United States

19 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or section 2261A’’

20 after ‘‘this section’’.

21 (2) Sections 2261(b) and 2262(b) of title 18,

22 United States Code, are each amended by striking

23 ‘‘offender’s spouse or intimate partner’’ each place it

24 appears and inserting ‘‘victim’’.
3

•HR 2980 RS

1 (3) The chapter heading for chapter 110A of

2 title 18, United States Code, is amended by insert3 ing ‘‘AND STALKING’’ after ‘‘VIOLENCE’’.

4 (4) The table of chapters at the beginning of

5 part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended

6 by striking

‘‘110A. Domestic violence ......................................................... 2261’’

7 and inserting:

‘‘110A. Domestic violence and stalking ............................... 2261’’.

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

9 at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States

10 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

11 section 2261 the following new item:

‘‘2261A. Interstate stalking.’’.
Calendar No. 421

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2980

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, with

respect to stalking.

MAY 23, 1996

Reported without amendment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50065

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WOLFGANG ERBSTOESSER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(98-CR-141-1)

- - - - - - - - - -

October 5, 1999

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Wolfgang Erbstoesser appeals from his

sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute MDMA and cocaine, possession with

intent to distribute MDMA, and importation of MDMA. He first

argues that the district court clearly erred by attributing one

pound of crystal methamphetamine to him as relevant conduct,

contending that evidence of the methamphetamine sale was

insufficiently reliable and that the sale of methamphetamine did
2

not qualify as relevant conduct. He also asserts that the district

court clearly erred by applying a two-level leadership adjustment

to his sentence, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). Factual findings

made by a sentencing court must be supported by a preponderance of

the evidence and are upheld unless clearly erroneous. United

States v. McCaskey, 9 F.3d 368, 372 (5th Cir. 1993). The

sentencing court’s interpretations of the guidelines are reviewed

de novo. Id.

Evidence of Erbstoesser’s methamphetamine sale was obtained

from interviews conducted by DEA agents and was corroborated by

Erbstoesser’s own statements to the DEA agents. The evidence was

therefore sufficiently reliable for sentencing purposes. See

United States v. Shacklett, 921 F.2d 580, 584-85 (5th Cir. 1991).

Although Erbstoesser argued against the inclusion of the

methamphetamine sale as relevant conduct and the imposition of the

leadership adjustment at sentencing, he failed to present any

rebuttal evidence as to either issue. Erbstoesser has therefore

failed to show that the district court clearly erred by adopting

the PSR’s factual findings regarding these issues. See United

States v. Rogers, 1 F.3d 341, 345 (5th Cir. 1993)(no clear error

shown when defendant failed to present evidence to rebut PSR’s

finding regarding relevant conduct). As we affirm the sentence

imposed by the district court, we need not consider Erbstoesser’s

request for a remand for the sentencing court to apply the “safety

valve provision.”

AFFIRMED.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Warren G.  Lichtenstein,  Chief Executive  Officer of Gateway
Industries,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify,
to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                        --------------------------
                                        Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        July 31, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 29, 2009, (74 FR 19598), Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 
1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by renewal 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Lisdexamfetamine (1205)....................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Phenylacetone (8501).......................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)  II
 (9273).
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for sale to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to ensure that 
the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: August 21, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21528 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership (the General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer of the General Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITT President and Chief Executive Officer May 14, 2004




/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLER Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer May 14, 2004
#### § 137.220 Do section 314 of Public Law 101-512 [25 U.S.C. 450f note] and section 102(d) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450f(d)] (regarding, in part, FTCA coverage) apply to compacts, funding agreements and construction project agreements?

Yes, regulations governing FTCA coverage are set out at 25 CFR Part 900, Subpart M.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano and Philippine Undersecretary Lazaro

# 									Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano and Philippine Undersecretary Lazaro							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 21, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano Masataka and Philippine Undersecretary Ma. Theresa P. Lazaro today in Tokyo, Japan. Their meeting follows a series of senior-level engagements over the past year to deepen trilateral cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Philippines.

Deputy Secretary Campbell, Vice Foreign Minister Okano, and Undersecretary Lazaro reiterated their collective commitment to maintaining peace and security in the Indo-Pacific, including in the South China Sea and East China Sea. The Deputy Secretary and his counterparts also discussed trilateral cooperation in areas related to economic security and resilience; defense and security; the international law of the sea, including freedom of navigation; and growing people-to-people ties. The Deputy Secretary and his counterparts also discussed plans for a leader-level trilateral summit to be held in Washington, D.C., on April 11.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDefenseDeputy Secretary of StateIndo-PacificJapanOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceSecurity

Back to Top
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21


<TABLE>
                                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                     (as of December 31, 2003)
         <S>                                                                            <C>
         Allegiant Bank                                                                 Missouri
              Allegiant Investment Company                                              Delaware
                  Allegiant Real Estate Investment Trust                                Delaware
              Equality Mortgage Company                                                 Missouri
              Allegiant Insurance Services Company                                      Missouri
         Kratky Road, Incorporated                                                      Missouri
         Allegiant Capital Corporation                                                  Missouri
         Allegiant Capital Trust I                                                      Delaware
         Allegiant Capital Trust II                                                     Delaware
         Allegiant Community Development Corporation                                    Missouri
         Allegiant Investment Counselors, Incorporated                                  Missouri
         Equality Commodity Corporation                                                 Missouri
</TABLE>
HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Events

# 									Events							

Circular Notes and Notices

**11/08/22: Notice: OFM Gingerbread Diplomacy Event – Call for Contestants and New Event**

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
§ 8.63 Hearings. ( a ) *Conduct.* The Administrative Law Judge shall preside at the hearing on a complaint for the disbarment or suspension of an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled practitioner. Hearings will be stenographically recorded and transcribed and the testimony of witnesses will be received under oath or affirmation. The Administrative Law Judge shall conduct hearings pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556.
( b ) *Failure to appear.* If either party to the proceedings fails to appear at the hearing, after due notice has been sent, the Administrative Law Judge may deem them to have waived the right to a hearing and may make a decision against the absent party by default.
§ 405.520 Payment for a physician assistant's, nurse practitioner's, and clinical nurse specialists' services and services furnished incident to their professional services. ( a ) *General rule.* A physician assistant's, nurse practitioner's, and clinical nurse specialists' services, and services and supplies furnished incident to their professional services, are paid in accordance with the physician fee schedule. The payment for a physician assistants' services may not exceed the limits at § 414.52 of this chapter. The payment for a nurse practitioners' and clinical nurse specialists' services may not exceed the limits at § 414.56 of this chapter.
( b ) *Requirements.* Medicare payment is made only if all claims for payment are made on an assignment-related basis in accordance with § 424.55 of this chapter, that sets forth, respectively, the conditions for coverage of physician assistants' services, nurse practitioners' services and clinical nurse specialists' services, and services and supplies furnished incident to their professional services.
( c ) *Civil money penalties.* Any person or entity who knowingly and willingly bills a Medicare beneficiary amounts in excess of the appropriate coinsurance and deductible is subject to a civil money penalty as described in §§ 402.1(c)(11), 402.105(d)(2)(viii), and 402.107(b)(8) of this chapter.
[63 FR 58905, Nov. 2, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 49547, Sept. 28, 2001]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                        OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                                       OF
                                BELMONT BANCORP.
                    FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

The undersigned is the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Belmont
Bancorp. (the "Issuer"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2002.

I certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.

This Certification is executed as of November 13, 2002.

                                             /s/ Jane Marsh
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                             Officer), and Secretary
40828.

#### YARBOROUGH v. HORIS A. WARD, INC.

Decided September 22, 1964.

*296
      *Hugh G. Head, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wm. B. Morgan, John L. Respess,*contra.

Russell, Judge.

*Code*§ 20-401 provides in part: “To make the following obligations binding on the promisor, the promise must be in writing, signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some person by him lawfully authorized, viz: 1. A promise by an executor, administrator, guardian or trustee to answer damages out of his own estate.” In Smolka v. Chandler & Son, 41 Del. 255 (20 A2d 131, 134 ALR 629), the court dealing with the question of whether one subsequently appointed executor might personally be liable for a contract with an undertaker to bury the deceased testator, held: “From a review of the authorities there is no reason to suppose that an executor or administrator cannot be bound personally on his contract with an undertaker for the burial of his decedent except as provided by the Statute of Frauds. It is more nearly accurate to say that an executor or administrator who engages the services of an undertaker is personally bound unless he has stipulated against personal liability, or the circumstances are such as clearly to show that the credit of the estate was accepted and the implication of promise by the estate to pay ... if this duty [to *297bury the decedent] is performed by the personal representative, or indeed by another not officiously but from necessity, the law implies a promise of reimbursement out of the assets of the estate for the reasonable expenses incurred and paid; but this is very far from saying that an executor or administrator cannot make himself personally liable for the funeral expenses. The undertaker is not, of course, bound to accept the credit of the estate; he may contract personally. Such contract may be by parol; and if the contract is performed, the executor or administrator is personally liable.” See also *Kenyon v. Brightwell,*120 Ga. 606 (4) (48 SE 124, 1 AC 169) and the cases cited in the annotations in 134 ALR p. 633 et seq. The general demurrer to the petition was properly overruled.

The rulings on special demurrer, not being argued, are considered abandoned. The general demurrer to the combined plea of res judicata and answer was overruled, and is thus favorable to the defendant. The orders recite that they are intended as rulings on demurrer only and specifically do not pass on the sufficiency of the plea, as to which no individual demurrer was interposed. The bill of exceptions does not assign error on the failure of the court to hear and rule on the plea at the time the demurrer rulings were entered; consequently, the position taken by the plaintiff in error in her brief that the court should as a matter of law have sustained the plea of res judicata has no legal basis on which to operate.

The trial court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*