alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3028 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3028

  To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released 
                          from incarceration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1996

 Mr. Conyers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released 
                          from incarceration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voting Rights of Former Offenders 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

    The right of a citizen of the United States, who otherwise is 
qualified, to vote in any election for Federal office shall not be 
denied or abridged because he has committed a criminal offense unless 
such citizen is imprisoned in a correctional institution or facility at 
the time of such election.

SEC. 3. STATE REQUIREMENTS.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the States from 
establishing requirements for the holding of State or local elective 
office; nor from enacting any State law which affords the right to vote 
in any election for Federal office on terms less restrictive than those 
established by this Act.

SEC. 4. OFFENSE.

    Whoever intentionally denies or attempts to deny any person any 
right secured by this Act shall be fined under title 18, United States 
Code, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``correctional institution or facility'' means 
        any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other institution or 
        facility for the confinement of individuals convicted of 
        criminal offenses, except that such term does not include any 
        residential community treatment center (or similar public or 
        private facility);
            (2) the term ``election'' means (A) a general, special, 
        primary, or runoff election, (B) a convention or caucus of a 
        political party held to nominate a candidate, (C) a primary 
        election held for the selection of delegates to a national 
        nominating convention of a political party, or (D) a primary 
        election held for the expression of a preference for the 
        nomination of persons for election to the office of President; 
        and
            (3) the term ``Federal office'' means the office of 
        President or Vice President of the United States, or of Senator 
        or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, 
        the Congress of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 566.302 Correspondent account.

The term *correspondent account* means an account established to receive deposits from, make payments on behalf of, or handle other financial transactions related to a foreign financial institution.
# C_2005182EN.01001001.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 26 May 2005

in Case C-409/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof in Société d'exportation de produits agricoles SA (SEPA) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (1)

1

(Export refunds - Beef - Special emergency slaughtering - Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 - Article 13 - Sound and fair marketable quality - Marketability in normal conditions)

(2005/C 182/18)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-409/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), made by decision of 15 July 2003, received at the Court on 1 October 2003, in the proceedings between Société d'exportation de produits agricoles SA (SEPA) and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, N. Colneric, K. Schiemann and E. Juhász (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 26 May 2005, in which it ruled:

Article 13 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products must be interpreted as meaning that meat fulfilling the hygiene criteria, the marketing of which for human consumption within the European Community is restricted by Community rules to the local market because it comes from animals which have undergone special emergency slaughtering, cannot be regarded as being of ‘sound and fair marketable quality’, as required for the grant of export refunds.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
#### § 21.44 Clinical or other practical demonstration.

In the discretion of the Surgeon General a candidate for appointment to any grade up to and including the senior assistant grade in the Regular Corps may be required to perform successfully a clinical or other practical demonstration which, if required, shall constitute a part of the professional examination.
#### § 137.334 What happens if the Secretary fails to notify the Self-Governance Tribe of a decision to approve or reject a final construction project proposal within the time period allowed?

If the Secretary fails to notify the Self-Governance Tribe of the decision to approve or reject within 30 days (or a longer period if agreed to by the Self-Governance Tribe in writing), then the proposal will be deemed approved by the Secretary.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2969

To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts by repealing the Tea Importation

Act of 1897.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1996

Mr. KLUG (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,

and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts by repealing the

Tea Importation Act of 1897.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Tea Tasters

5 Repeal Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TEA IMPORTATION ACT OF 1897.

7 The Tea Importation Act (21 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) is

8 repealed.
2

HR 2969 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment

3 of this Act.

Æ
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No . 0 4- 09 -0 05 25 -C V EM C M OR TG AG E C OR P OR AT ION , As Servicing Ag ent for B anker s Trust Company , As Owne r Trustee for UCF C Home Equity L oan Owne r Trust 1998-B A, Create d Pursuant to a Trust Ag ree ment, Dated a s of September 1, 1998, betwee n UCFC Acc eptanc e Corpora tion, as Depositor,

Appellant
v. J ohn K. SAUNDERS , I ndepende nt Ex ecutor of the Estate of Doug las L . Saunders, De cea sed, Appellee
Fr om the 224th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CI -05026 Honora ble B arba ra H anson Ne llermoe, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: October 28, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant has f

iled a motion to dism iss th i s ap peal. The motion contains a ce rtificate of
s e r v ic e to A p p e ll e e Jo h n K
. Sa u n d e r s w h o h a s n o t o p p o s e d th e mo ti o n . We , th e r e f o r e , g rant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 2). PER C URI AM
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3929 — Barclays Private Equity/Neumayer)

(2005/C 230/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
# C_2005205EN.01001101.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court), Divisional Court, by order of that court of 20 May 2005 in The Queen on the application of Thames Water Utilities Ltd v South East London Division, Bromley Magistrates' Court, Intervener: The Environment Agency

(Case C-252/05)

(2005/C 205/20)

Language of the case: English

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court), Divisional Court, of 20 May 2005, received at the Court Registry on 15 June 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between The Queen on the application of Thames Water Utilities Ltd and South East London Division, Bromley Magistrates' Court, Intervener: Environment Agency, on the following question:

| 1. | Whether sewage which escapes from a sewerage network maintained by a statutory sewerage undertaker pursuant to the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC (1) (‘UWWTD’) and/or the Water Industry Act 1991 (‘WIA 1991’), amounts to ‘directive waste’ for the purposes of the Directive 75/442/EEC (2) (as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC (3)) (‘the Waste Framework Directive’ hereinafter, the ‘WFD’). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Whether sewage which escapes from a sewerage network maintained by a statutory sewerage undertaker pursuant to the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC (1) (‘UWWTD’) and/or the Water Industry Act 1991 (‘WIA 1991’), amounts to ‘directive waste’ for the purposes of the Directive 75/442/EEC (2) (as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC (3)) (‘the Waste Framework Directive’ hereinafter, the ‘WFD’).

1

2

3

| 2. | If the answer to (1) is in the affirmative, whether the aforesaid sewage:






  (a) | is excluded from the scope of ‘directive waste’ under the WFD by virtue of article 2(1)(b)(iv) of the WFD, in particular, by virtue of the UWWTD and/or the WIA 1991; or, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to (1) is in the affirmative, whether the aforesaid sewage:

(a)

is excluded from the scope of ‘directive waste’ under the WFD by virtue of article 2(1)(b)(iv) of the WFD, in particular, by virtue of the UWWTD and/or the WIA 1991; or,

| (b) | comes within article 2(2) of the WFD and is excluded from the scope of ‘directive waste’ under the WFD, in particular, by virtue of the UWWTD. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

comes within article 2(2) of the WFD and is excluded from the scope of ‘directive waste’ under the WFD, in particular, by virtue of the UWWTD.

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, OJ L 135, 30.05.1991, p. 40.

1

(2)  Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, OJ L 194, 25.07.1975, p. 39.

2

(3)  Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, OJ L 78, 26.03.1991, p. 32.

3

---
Exhibit 4.5


 


English Translation of Business License for SGOCO (Fujian)
Electronic Co., Ltd. 


 


Registered Number: 350500400057587


 


Date of Set-up: 28TH July,
2011


 


The Enterprise Name: SGOCO (Fujian) Electronic
Co., Ltd.


 


Address: Guanke Technology Park, Houlin Community,
Luoshan Street, Jinjiang City, Fujian Province


 


Legal Representative: Hong Cheng


 


Registered Capital: USD 2,200,000


 


Real Capital: USD 449,960


 


Enterprise Type: Limited liability (Limited liability
(Taiwan, Hong Kong & Macao Corporation Owned Enterprises)


 


Scope of Management: Engage in research
and development, wholesale of software products, electronic material, computer-aided design (3-D CAD), new type flat panel monitor
parts, digital TV, computer, digital display, digital electronics, TFT-LCD, PDP, OLED, FED(including SED) display monitors, digital
video, digital speaker, large screen colored display engine, light-source, projector, laptop computer, high end computer server,
broadband(UWB), telecommunication equipment, network exchange equipment, high end router, car electronics accessories, metal product
standard mold, high precision stamping dies, precision cavity mold, mold standard parts, and non-metal product mold.


 


Shareholder (The founder): SGOCO International (HK)
Limited


 


Business Term: From July 28, 2011 to July 27, 2041


 


Issued Unit:  Quanzhou Administration of Industry
and Commerce
| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                          |                             |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                 | **Security              Capital Corporation** |
|                            |                                     |                        |
| Date: May              11, 2006 | By:                                 | /s/ Frank              West |
|                                 | Frank West                                    |
|                                 | Chief              Executive Officer          |
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.102 Amounts of payment. ( a ) The amounts Medicare pays for hospital insurance benefits are generally determined in accordance with part 412 or part 413 of this chapter.
( b ) Except as provided in §§ 409.61(d) and 409.89, hospital insurance benefits are subject to the deductible and coinsurance requirements set forth in subpart G of this part.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40293 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUGO P. ABSALON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC Nos. B-00-CV-186 &
B-98-CR-506-1

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hugo P. Absalon, federal prisoner # 82491-079, appeals the

denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence.

The only issue before us is whether the district judge should have

disqualified herself from Absalon’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings.

Cf. Trevino v. Johnson , 168 F.3d 173, 177 (5th Cir. 1999) (habeas

petitioner did not need COA to appeal denial of motion for

disqualification).

Absalon contends that recusal was mandated under 28 U.S.C.2

§ 455(a), and we review the denial of a motion to disqualify made

pursuant to that section for an abuse of discretion. U nited States

v. Bremers

, 195 F.3d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1999). Absalon argues that

Judge Tagle’s legal rulings evidence a bias against him. The

record, however, is devoid of evidence that Judge Tagle’s rulings

involved an extrajudicial source and, standing alone, they do not

show “a deep-seated f avoritism or antagonism” required to

constitute grounds for disqualification. L iteky v. United States

,

510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994).

Absalon’s argument that Judge Tagle knew that false testimony

was presented to his grand jury is conclusional and therefore an

insufficient basis on which to require recusal. S ee United States

v. Schoenhoff

, 919 F.2d 936, 940 (5th Cir. 1990). We additionally

reject the argument that recusal was mandated because Judge Tagle

presided over Absalon’s conviction and sentencing proceedings; we

have refused to create a mandatory recusal rule in cases where the

district judge has made determi nations in earlier proceedings on

ultimate issues. U nited States v. Mizell

, 88 F.3d 288, 300 (5th

Cir. 1996). Moreover, any opinions formed by Judge Tagle on the

basis o f facts introduced at Absalon’s prior proceedings cannot

constitute a basis for a partiality motion, because they do not

“display a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make a

fair judgment impossible.” See Liteky , 510 U.S. at 555.

Finally, we hold harmless any alleged error on Judge Tagle’s

part in making rulings during the pendency of the motion to3 G:\opin-sc\01-40293a.opn.wpd disqualify, because recusal was ultimately not mandated. See F ED

.

R. C IV

. P. 61.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2005297EN.01000101.xml

| 29.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 November 2005

(2005/C 297/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1726 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4570 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68550 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4585 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5471 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9560 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,963 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8870 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6547 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,751 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5960 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5949 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3716 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0928 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6797 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9890 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 217,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6427 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4775 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4018 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 790,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,432 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,660 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,8050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,387 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1726

JPY

Japanese yen

140,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4570

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68550

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4585

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5471

ISK

Iceland króna

74,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9560

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

28,963

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8870

RON

Romanian leu

3,6547

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,751

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5960

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5949

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3716

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0928

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6797

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9890

KRW

South Korean won

1 217,86

ZAR

South African rand

7,6427

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4775

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4018

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 790,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,432

PHP

Philippine peso

63,660

RUB

Russian rouble

33,8050

THB

Thai baht

48,387

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 410

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

#### § 410.14 Special requirements for services furnished outside the United States.

Medicare part B pays for physicians' services and ambulance services furnished outside the United States if the services meet the applicable conditions of § 410.12 and are furnished in connection with covered inpatient hospital services that meet the specific requirements and conditions set forth in subpart H of part 424 of this chapter.

[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 6648, Mar. 2, 1988]
#### § 558.408 Charitable contributions.

Unless specifically authorized by OFAC pursuant to this part, no charitable contribution of funds, goods, services, or technology, including contributions to relieve human suffering, such as food, clothing, or medicine, may be made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 558.201. For the purposes of this part, a contribution is made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 558.201 if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, such a person; if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, an entity or individual acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled by, such a person; or if made in an attempt to violate, to evade, or to avoid the bar on the provision of contributions by, to, or for the benefit of such a person, or the receipt of contributions from such a person.