alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3094

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an exemption

from the overtime compensation provisions of such Act for professional

employees of contractors and subcontractors of the Federal Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1996

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide

for an exemption from the overtime compensation provisions of such Act for professional employees of contractors and subcontractors of the Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OVERTIME EXEMPTION FOR FEDERAL GOV4 ERNMENT CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRAC5 TOR EMPLOYEES.

6 Section 13(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

7 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)) is amended by striking the pe-
2

•HR 3094 IH

1 riod at the end of paragraph (30) and inserting ‘‘; or’’

2 and by adding after paragraph (30) the following:

3 ‘‘(31) any employee of a contractor or sub4 contractor of a department, agency, instrumentality,

5 or establishment of the Federal Government while

6 the employee is employed on a contract with the

7 Federal Government and is employed in a profes8 sional capacity under regulations of the Secretary.’’.

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

11 on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply

12 to any cause of action relating to overtime compensation

13 for the employees referred to in section 13(b)(31) of the

14 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 which arose before, on,

15 or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 589.340 U.S. depository institution.

The term *U.S. depository institution* means any entity (including its foreign branches) organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, or any agency, office, or branch located in the United States of a foreign entity, that is engaged primarily in the business of banking (for example, banks, savings banks, savings associations, credit unions, trust companies, and United States bank holding companies) and is subject to regulation by Federal or State banking authorities.
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Czech Republic (19-918.1) – Agreement on Nuclear Safety

# 									Czech Republic (19-918.1) – Agreement on Nuclear Safety							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Nuclear Energy: Safety

Signed at Vienna September 18, 2019; entered into force September 18, 2019.  With annex.
Download Agreement						 [4 MB]

Tags

Czech RepublicNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
#### § 137.141 How does the Secretary reject a final offer?

The Secretary must reject a final offer by providing written notice to the Indian Tribe based on the criteria in § 137.140 not more than 45 days after receipt of a final offer, or within a longer time period as agreed by the Self-Governance Tribe consistent with this subpart.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Swiss State Secretary Leu

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Swiss State Secretary Leu							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 6, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman spoke with Swiss State Secretary Livia Leu today.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and State Secretary Leu discussed the U.S.-Switzerland Strategic Partnership Dialogue, reaffirming the strong bilateral relationship between the United States and Switzerland.  The Deputy Secretary and State Secretary underscored our enduring support for Ukraine and commitment to regional stability and security.  Deputy Secretary Sherman thanked State Secretary Leu for her partnership in her current role and wished her well in her next diplomatic assignment.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonSecurityStabilizationStrategic DialogueSwitzerland

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         342,740
<SECURITIES>                                    94,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,350
<INVENTORY>                                    201,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               716,864
<PP&E>                                          43,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 769,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          223,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     533,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   769,143
<SALES>                                        541,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,911
<CGS>                                          159,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  414,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        




</TABLE>
EX-10.12





 EXHIBIT 10.12 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
 BILL
PAY SERVICE RESELLER AGREEMENT 
 This Third Amendment to Bill Pay Service Reseller Agreement (“Third Amendment”) is entered into this 7th day of March, 2017 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between CO-OP eCom, LLC, a California limited liability company (“eCom”) and Alkami
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Reseller”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into that certain Bill Pay Service Reseller
Agreement dated June 28, 2013, as amended (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to further amend the Agreement
as provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 The Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following language to the end of Section 2
(“Exhibits”): 


 “(f) Exhibit E - Business Bill Pay Service Description and Service Fees” 

 

	2.	 All references in the Agreement to “Exhibit A” are hereby amended to read “Exhibit A and
Exhibit E.” 


  

	3.	 The Agreement is hereby amended by attaching Exhibit E, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein,
thereto and thereby incorporating it by reference into the Agreement. 


  

	4.	 Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all terms and provisions contained in the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. 


  

	5.	 All capitalized terms not defined in this Third Amendment have the meanings defined in the Agreement.



 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment effective as of the Amendment Effective Date. 

 

			
	CO-OP eCom, LLC	  	Alkami Technology, Inc
		
	By: /s/ Kimberly Hester	  	By: /s/ Douglas Linebarger
	Name: Kimberly Hester	  	Name: Doug Linebarger
	Title: Manager	  	Title: General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2961 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2961

                  For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1996

  Mr. Doyle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to the awarding of the 
medal of honor to Wayne T. Alderson of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 
recognition of acts performed at the risk of his life and beyond the 
call of duty while serving as a private first class in the United 
States Army in Germany during World War II.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.12 Charges imposed by an immediate relative or member of the beneficiary's household. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Medicare does not pay for services usually covered under Medicare if the charges for those services are imposed by— ( 1 ) An immediate relative of the beneficiary; or
( 2 ) A member of the beneficiary's household.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Immediate relative* means any of the following: ( 1 ) Husband or wife.
( 2 ) Natural or adoptive parent, child, or sibling.
( 3 ) Stepparent, stepchild, stepbrother, or stepsister.
( 4 ) Father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law.
( 5 ) Grandparent or grandchild.
( 6 ) Spouse of grandparent or grandchild.
*Member of the household* means any person sharing a common abode as part of a single family unit, including domestic employees and others who live together as part of a family unit, but not including a mere roomer or boarder.
*Professional corporation* means a corporation that is completely owned by one or more physicians and is operated for the purpose of conducting the practice of medicine, osteopathy dentistry, podiatry, optometry, or chiropractic, or is owned by other health care professionals as authorized by State law.
( c ) *Applicability of the exclusion.* The exclusion applies to the following charges in the specified circumstances: ( 1 ) *Physicians' services.* ( i ) Charges for physicians' services furnished by an immediate relative of the beneficiary or member of the beneficiary's household, even if the bill or claim is submitted by another individual or by an entity such as a partnership or a professional corporation.
( ii ) Charges for services furnished incident to a physician's professional services (for example by the physician's nurse or technician), only if the physician who ordered or supervised the services has an excluded relationship to the beneficiary.
( 2 ) *Services other than physicians' services.* ( i ) Charges imposed by an individually owned provider or supplier if the owner has an excluded relationship to the beneficiary; and
( ii ) Charges imposed by a partnership if any of the partners has an excluded relationship to the beneficiary.
( d ) *Exception to the exclusion.* The exclusion does not apply to charges imposed by a corporation other than a professional corporation.
#### George RUSSO and Velma Russo, his wife, Appellants, v. Richard W. GENSEL, doing business as El Rancho Realty, Appellee.

No. 74-588.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.377 Expert opinions from outside sources. ( a ) CMS may request expert advice from qualified sources if CMS believes that the advice is necessary to respond to a request for an advisory opinion. For example, CMS may require the use of accountants or business experts to assess the structure of a complex business arrangement or to ascertain a physician's or immediate family member's financial relationship with entities that provide designated health services.
( b ) If CMS determines that it needs to obtain expert advice in order to issue a requested advisory opinion, CMS notifies the requestor of that fact and provides the identity of the appropriate expert and an estimate of the costs of the expert advice. As indicated in § 411.375(d), the requestor must pay the estimated cost of the expert advice.
( c ) Once CMS has received payment for the estimated cost of the expert advice, CMS arranges for the expert to provide a prompt review of the issue or issues in question. CMS considers any additional expenses for the expert advice, beyond the estimated amount, as part of the costs CMS has incurred in responding to the request, and the responsibility of the requestor, as described in § 411.375(c).
[69 FR 57229, Sept. 24, 2004]
## Jackie A. Walker Clinton County Legislator, Area 8 229 Champlain Drive Plattsburgh, New York 12901 Phone: (518) 563-8525 awalker8991@Charter.net

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief U.S. Department ofTransportation Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis West Building, 

### 18th Floor 

### 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington DC 

### 20590

Dear Mr. De Vany: 

## DOT-OS!-loOJ-J41-S3

c·.- >'--;**/,~:.'-' ~**  f
" .,IV,i

February 

### 1,2010

I am writingthis letter in support ofCape Air. During mynine years as a Clinton County Legislator, I have witnessed two airlines here inPlattsburgh in the Essential Air Service (EAS) Program that have failed. Wearenow served successfullybyCape Air. Overthe last two years, Cape Airhas consistently increased enplanements and have overwhelming support from their ridership--the everyday taxpayer ofClinton County.

I represent Legislative Area 

### 8 where the airport is located, and Ihave been a member ofthe Plattsburgh International Airport Committee (PIAC) since its inception. Until about two months ago, I had neverheard ofColgan Pinnacle. Atthat time, GarryDouglas, Director ofthe Plattsburgh-North Country ChamberofCommerce, attended ourPIAC meeting. Duringthis meeting, he introduced the Committee members to Colgan, via a teleconference call. That is the only contact I have everhad with Colgan. Two weeks ago, Mr. Douglas told mepersonallythat it has taken him three years to convince Colgan to cometo Plattsburgh. During that conference call with Colgan, we asked about the Lake Clear stop. Colgan officials stated that Plattsburgh did not have enough enplanements without that stop. Two months later, do we?
Colgan has a history, easily accessible from the internet, oftheir proposals for other EAS contracts with low ticket prices that once awarded the contract, the prices become excessive. 

### It is there inblack and white. Colgan is also asking for approximately 

### $800,000 more than Cape Air for Essential Air Service to Plattsburgh. This request for more dollars to give us less flights at increased ticket prices and subsequentlyremoving a successful airline from the EAS Program is unacceptable to me. Plattsburghhas the best EAS partner in our history. Ridership is increasing daily, consumers love Cape Air, and in our two year partnership with Cape Air, we havereceived no complaints.Mr. Dennis J. DeVany February 1,2010 Page 2

My last concern is that because ofsome uninformed community leaders, the integrity ofthe EAS Program is injeopardy. EAS is to assist Plattsburgh residents. It is not for the residents ofthe metropolitan Montreal area. They are not 

### in the program. When three 

### out ofthe four Plattsburgh International Airport Committee members support Cape Air, the fourth undecided, perhaps it is because she is liaison to the Chamber, that speaks volumes. Colgan has shown very little interest in Plattsburgh.

Clinton Countyhas a success story with Cape Air. Let's continue two more years. Perhaps they will grow us out ofthe EAS Program! Onward and upward!
Sincerely,

Jackie A. Walker CountyLegislator, Area 8

JAW/mal
§ 1008.41 OIG acceptance of the request. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request for an advisory opinion, the OIG will promptly make an initial determination whether the submission includes all of the information the OIG will require to process the request.
( b ) Within 10 working days of receipt of the request, the OIG will— ( 1 ) Formally accept the request for an advisory opinion,
( 2 ) Notify the requestor of what additional information is needed, or
( 3 ) Formally decline to accept the request.
( c ) If the requestor provides the additional information requested, or otherwise resubmits the request, the OIG will process the resubmission in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section as if it was an initial request for an advisory opinion.
( d ) Upon acceptance of the request, the OIG will notify the requestor by regular U.S. mail of the date that the request for the advisory opinion was formally accepted.
( e ) The 60-day period for issuance of an advisory opinion set forth in § 1008.43(c) of this part will not commence until the OIG has formally accepted the request for an advisory opinion.
[62 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 38326, July 16, 1998]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 22, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be held Thursday, October 22, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the                     *Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: August 31, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-21451 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 405.986 Good cause for reopening. ( a ) *Establishing good cause for reopening.* Good cause may be established when— ( 1 ) There is new and material evidence that— ( i ) Was not available or known at the time of the determination or decision; and
( ii ) May result in a different conclusion; or
( 2 ) The evidence that was considered in making the determination or decision clearly shows on its face that an obvious error was made at the time of the determination or decision.
( b ) *Change in substantive law or interpretative policy.* A change of legal interpretation or policy by CMS in a regulation, CMS ruling, or CMS general instruction, or a change in legal interpretation or policy by SSA in a regulation, SSA ruling, or SSA general instruction in entitlement appeals, whether made in response to judicial precedent or otherwise, is not a basis for reopening a determination or hearing decision under this section. This provision does not preclude contractors from conducting reopenings to effectuate coverage decisions issued under the authority granted by section 1869(f) of the Act.
( c ) *Third party payer error.* A request to reopen a claim based upon a third party payer's error in making a primary payment determination when Medicare processed the claim in accordance with the information in its system of records or on the claim form does not constitute good cause for reopening.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 37703, June 30, 2005; 86 FR 65660, Nov. 19, 2021]
§ 800.233 Minimum excepted ownership. The term *minimum excepted ownership* means: ( a ) With respect to an entity whose equity securities are primarily traded on an exchange in an excepted foreign state or the United States, a majority of its voting interest, the right to a majority of its profits, and the right in the event of dissolution to a majority of its assets; and
( b ) With respect to an entity whose equity securities are not primarily traded on an exchange in an excepted foreign state or the United States, 80 percent or more of its voting interest, the right to 80 percent or more of its profits, and the right in the event of dissolution to 80 percent or more of its assets.
#### § 137.337 What funding must the Secretary provide in a construction project agreement?

The Secretary must provide funding for a construction project agreement in accordance with sections 106 [25 U.S.C. 450j-1] and 508(c) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-7(c)].
#### § 137.255 What does reassumption mean?

Reassumption means rescission by the Secretary without consent of the Self-Governance Tribe of PSFAs and associated funding in a compact or funding agreement and resuming responsibility to provide such PSFAs.