alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-16,351-14

EX P ARTE ALONZO DIEGO F ULLER, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-12265- J IN THE 35 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BROWN COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and sentenc ed to ninety -nine y ear s’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Fuller v. State , No. 11-03-00093- CR (Tex. App.—Eastland Oct. 13 , 2 0 0 5 )( n o t desig nated f

or publication). In his prese nt application, Ap plicant raises g rounds challeng ing his conviction. This application, howeve r, prese nts a more serious question. Applicant alleg es that he is actua lly innocent. In support of his alleg ati o n s , Ap p l i cant submitt ed a document purporting to be a lab2

repor t. The trial court held a habea s hearing and has found that the document prese nted to this Court is fraudule nt. The writ of habea s corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W .2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). We find that Applicant has abused The Gre at Writ by submitt ing false evidenc e. We dismiss this application and based on Applicant’s submissi on of fa lse evidenc e, we find that Applicant ha s filed a f rivolous lawsuit. Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: Apr il 11, 2018 Do not publish
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 July 2005

(2005/C 178/03)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
# C_2005296EN.01002202.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2005 — Fischer v Court of Justice

Fischer

Court of Justice

(Case T-404/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Action for annulment - Invalidity - Half-time on medical grounds - Statement of reasons - Invalidity committee - Action for damages)

(2005/C 296/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Pia Fischer (Konz-Roscheid, Germany) (represented by: C Marhuenda, lawyer)

Applicant(s)

Defendant(s): Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented by: M. Schauss, Agent)

Defendant(s)

Subject-matter of the case

Firstly, an application for annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority of 10 April and 6 June 2003 declaring that the applicant was not affected by complete and permanent invalidity making it impossible for her to carry out duties involved in a post in her career bracket and requesting her to return to work on a half-time basis on medical grounds for a total period of 13 weeks. Secondly, an application for the payment of 1 EUR as token damages for the non-material loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed in its entirety. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 21.2.2004

1

---
§ 901.6 Suspension or revocation of eligibility for loans and loan guaranties, licenses, permits, or privileges. ( a ) Unless waived by the head of the agency, agencies are not permitted to extend financial assistance in the form of a loan, loan guarantee, or loan insurance to any person delinquent on a nontax debt owed to a Federal agency. This prohibition does not apply to disaster loans. The authority to waive the application of this section may be delegated to the Chief Financial Officer and redelegated only to the Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the agency. Agencies may extend credit after the delinquency has been resolved. The Secretary may exempt classes of debts from this prohibition and has prescribed standards defining when a “delinquency” is “resolved” for purposes of this prohibition. See 31 CFR 285.13 (Barring Delinquent Debtors From Obtaining Federal Loans or Loan Insurance or Guarantees).
( b ) In non-bankruptcy cases, agencies seeking the collection of statutory penalties, forfeitures, or other types of claims should consider the suspension or revocation of licenses, permits, or other privileges for any inexcusable or willful failure of a debtor to pay such a debt in accordance with the agency's regulations or governing procedures. The debtor should be advised in the agency's written demand for payment of the agency's ability to suspend or revoke licenses, permits, or privileges. Any agency making, guaranteeing, insuring, acquiring, or participating in, loans should consider suspending or disqualifying any lender, contractor, or broker from doing further business with the agency or engaging in programs sponsored by the agency if such lender, contractor, or broker fails to pay its debts to the Government within a reasonable time or if such lender, contractor, or broker has been suspended, debarred, or disqualified from participation in a program or activity by another Federal agency. The failure of any surety to honor its obligations in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 9305 should be reported to the Treasury. The Treasury will forward to all interested agencies notification that a surety's certificate of authority to do business with the Government has been revoked by the Treasury.
( c ) The suspension or revocation of licenses, permits, or privileges also should extend to Federal programs or activities that are administered by the states on behalf of the Federal Government, to the extent that they affect the Federal Government's ability to collect money or funds owed by debtors. Therefore, states that manage Federal activities, pursuant to approval from the agencies, should ensure that appropriate steps are taken to safeguard against issuing licenses, permits, or privileges to debtors who fail to pay their debts to the Federal Government.
( d ) In bankruptcy cases, before advising the debtor of an agency's intention to suspend or revoke licenses, permits, or privileges, agencies should seek legal advice from their agency counsel concerning the impact of the Bankruptcy Code, particularly 11 U.S.C. 362 and 525, which may restrict such action.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Harry O. CRAMER v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, et al.

No. 66070.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 1980.

In re Harry 0. Cramer, applying for writ of mandamus. Orleans' Parish. No. 259-221.

Denied; the district court has acted, and the application is moot.
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Mitchell D. Staples, principal financial officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation ofAlabama, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004  /s/ Mitchell D. Staples   Mitchell D. Staples Principal financial officer
#### AMERICAN FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. O. Jennings MURRHEE, as Sheriff of Clay County, State of Florida, and Harvey Nall, and John A. Peterson, as Deputy Sheriff of Clay County, Sheriff's Department, State of Florida, Appellees.

No. KK-373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 23, 1979.

*743Lawrence C. Rolfe, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Richard W. Cobb, Orange Park,.for appel-lees.

MITCHELL, Henry Clay, Jr., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s denial of a complaint to set aside a Sheriff’s sale.

Based on the evidence presented, the trial court found that the Appellant had failed to prove sufficient grounds for setting aside the Sheriff’s sale.

The order and judgment entered was one within the discretion of the court. We have examined the record and find that under the facts presented, the action of the trial court was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the order and judgment appealed from is

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.
§ 403.310 Reduction in payments. ( a ) *General rule.* If CMS determines that the satisfactory assurances required of a State under § 403.304(c) and, if applicable, § 403.304(d) have not been met, or will not be met, with respect to any 36-month period, CMS will reduce Medicare payments to individual hospitals being reimbursed under the State's system or, if applicable, under the Medicare payment system, in an amount equal to the amount by which the Medicare payments under the system exceed the amount of Medicare payments to such hospitals that otherwise would have been made not using the State system. The amount of the recoupment will include, when appropriate, interest charges computed in accordance with § 405.378 of this chapter.
( b ) *Recoupment procedures.* The amount of the overpayment will be recouped on a proportionate basis from each of those hospitals that received payments under the State system that exceeded the payments they would have received under the Medicare payment system. Each hospital's share of the aggregate excess payment will be determined on the basis of a comparison of the hospital's proportionate share of the aggregate payment received under the State system that is in excess of what the aggregate payment would have been under the Medicare payment system. Recoupments may be accomplished by a hospital's direct payment to the Medicare program or by offsets to future payments made to the hospital.
( c ) *Alternative recoupment procedures.* As an alternative to the recoupment procedures described in paragraph (b) of this section and subject to CMS's acceptance, the State may provide, by legislation or legally binding regulations, procedures for the recoupment of the amount of payments that exceed the amount of payments that otherwise would have been paid by Medicare if the State system had not been in effect.
( d ) *Rule for existing Medicare demonstration projects.* In cases of existing Medicare demonstration projects where the expenditure test is to be applied by a rate of increase factor, the amount of the excess payment will be determined, for the three hospital cost reporting periods beginning before October 1, 1986, by a comparison of the State system's rate of increase to the national rate of increase. Recoupment of excessive payments will be assessed and recouped as described in this section.
[51 FR 15492, Apr. 24, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 63748, Dec. 2, 1996]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3040 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3040

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel TWO CAN.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1996

   Mr. Peterson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel TWO CAN.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 
12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation 
may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement 
for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel TWO CAN (United 
States official number 932361).
                                 <all>
```
HomeVenezuela

# Venezuela

160 items

        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Pedro Luis Martin-Olivares – New Target	  September 29, 2020 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Maikel Jose Moreno Perez	  July 21, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Venezuela	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Venezuela	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Venezuela	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Joselit de la Trinidad Ramirez-Camacho	  June 1, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Diosdado Cabello Rondón — New Target	  March 26, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Cliver Antonio Alcalá Cordones — New Target	  March 26, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Hugo Armando Carvajal Barrios– New Target	  March 26, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Tareck Zaidan El Aissami Maddah– New Target	  March 26, 2020 

previous page1…1213141516next page

Back to Top
# Oman

		Subscribe		

111 items

        -    		Oman	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Oman	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		U.S.-Oman FTA Investor-State Arbitrations	   
        -    Report  		Oman	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Oman	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Oman	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Oman	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Oman	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Oman	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Oman	  June 27, 2017 

previous page1…89101112next page

Back to Top
#### § 591.313 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, or commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
HomeSaint Lucia

# Saint Lucia

59 items

        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Eastern Caribbean Summary	   
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Saint Lucia	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Saint Lucia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Saint Lucia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Saint Lucia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Saint Lucia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Saint Lucia	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Saint Lucia	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Saint Lucia	  March 13, 2019 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
#### Eugene A. WILSON, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6960.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 5, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15, 1979.*

David K. Balfour, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Downs & Downs by James C. Downs, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellees.

Before FORET, CUTRER and SWIFT, JJ.

*

 Foret, J., would grant a rehearing.

SWIFT, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case of *Brown et al. v. Louisiana Department of Highways et al.,*La. App., 373 So.2d 605, we affirm the decision of the trial court at appellant’s costs.

AFFIRMED.

FORET, J., dissents with written reasons.

FORET, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent herein for the reasons stated in *Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways et al.,*373 So.2d 605.
#### § 599.802 Delegation of certain authorities of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to E.O. 14059 of December 15, 2021, and any further Executive orders issued pursuant to the national emergency declared therein, may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
#### CITY OF TAMPA, Appellant, v. Buddy W. MORALES, Appellee.

No. PP-370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 1980.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1980.

James A. Sheehan, Tampa, for appellant.

Joseph E. Melendi, Tampa, for appellee.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The self-insured employer appeals, and the claimant cross-appeals, a worker’s compensation order which we affirm except as to the award of 80% permanent partial disability benefits based upon diminution of wage earning capacity. The claimant's injury precludes his continued employment as a fireman, and he has unsuccessfully attempted to continue his part-time employment as an automotive mechanic. However, although the record evidence does not indicate that less strenuous employment is necessarily beyond his capabilities, the claimant has made no other effort to test his employability on the open labor market. The claimant’s failure to adequately seek employment within his physical capabilities precludes any consideration of wage earning capacity loss, and the compensation awarded should have been based only upon the anatomic impairment sustained. *Exxon Co. U.S.A. v. Alexis,*370 So.2d 1128 (Fla. *9121978); *Mahler v. Lauderdale Lakes National Bank,*322 So.2d 507 (Fla.1975). The judge of industrial claims found that the claimant in the present case has sustained an anatomic impairment of 18% of the body as a whole; the order appealed is amended so as to award compensation for an 18% permanent partial disability.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed as amended.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### § 582.802 Delegation of certain authorities by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 13851 of November 27, 2018, and any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared therein, and any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Memorandum of May 24, 2019: Delegation of Functions and Authorities under the Nicaragua Human Rights and Anticorruption Act of 2018, May 24, 2019 (published June 13, 2019), may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.

[85 FR 43437, July 17, 2020]