alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005171EN.01001402.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 11 May 2005

in Case T-25/03, Marco de Stefano v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Community officials - Open competition - Non-admission to tests - Required diplomas)

(2005/C 171/24)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-25/03, Marco de Stefano, official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden and G. Verbrugge, lawyers, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and L. Lozano Palacios, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the selection board's decision of 8 April 2002 rejecting the applicant's candidature in competition EUR/A/166/01, held for the purpose of constituting a reserve for recruitment of A7/A6 administrators in the area of auditing and, in the alternative, a claim for damages — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; M. I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 11 May 2005, in which it:

| 1 | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1

Dismisses the action.

| 2 | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003

1

---
Kizhuyak Bay

Zachar Bay

Ka rluk

River

Red Lake

Frazer Lake

Womens Bay

Uganik

River

Spiridon

River

Ban Island

Afognak

Island

Uganik Island

Ouzinkie

Akhiok

Kodiak

Karluk

Kaguyak

Larsen Bay

Old Harbor

Port Lions

1

3 2

5

4

7

S h e l i k o f

S t r a

i t

O l g a

B a y

D e a d m a n

B a y

A l i t a k B a y

Kaiugnak Bay

Kiavak Bay

Kaguyak Bay

Sitkalidak

Strait

K i l i u d a B a y

P a c i f i c O c e a n

U g a k B a y

V i e k o d a B a y

U g a n i k B a y

S p i r i d o n B a y

U y a k B a y

F o u l B a y

M a r m o t B a y

M a l i n a B a y

Paramonof Bay

Shuyak Strait

Kazakof Bay

Karluk Lake

Kodiak

NWR

Alaska

Canada

Gulf of Alaska

Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge

Land ownership is not shown on this map.

Please contact Refuge for land ownership.

0 4 8 16 24 32

Kilometers

0 2 4 8 12 16

Miles

09-0077

Public Use Cabins

2 Viekoda Bay Cabin

3 Uganik Island Cabin

5 Little River Lake Cabin

1 Blue Fox Bay Cabin 6 South Frazer Lake Cabin

4 Uganik Lake Cabin

7 North Frazer Lake Cabin

Kodiak Refuge

6

Area Outside of

Kodiak Refuge
Order entered August 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-18-00879-CV No. 05-18-00880-CV

IN RE JOSE WILLIAM PATINO, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Criminal Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. MC17A8234 and MC17A8235



### ORDER Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
§ 405.515 Reimbursement for clinical laboratory services billed by physicians. This section implements section 1842(h) of the Social Security Act, which places a limitation on reimbursement for markups on clinical laboratory services billed by physicians. If a physician's bill, or a request for payment for a physician's services, includes a charge for a laboratory test for which payment may be made under this part, the amount payable with respect to the test shall be determined as follows (subject to the coinsurance and deductible provisions at §§ 410.152 and 410.160 of this chapter): ( a ) If the bill or request for payment indicates that the test was personally performed or supervised either by the physician who submitted the bill (or for whose services the request for payment was made), or by another physician with whom that physician shares his or her practice, the payment will be based on the physician's reasonable charge for the test (as determined in accordance with § 405.502).
( b ) If the bill or request for payment indicates that the test was performed by an outside laboratory, and identifies both the laboratory and the amount the laboratory charged, payment for the test will be based on the lower of— ( 1 ) The laboratory's reasonable charge for the service (as determined in accordance with § 405.502), or
( 2 ) The amount that the laboratory charged the physician for the service.
( c ) If the bill or request for payment does not indicate that the conditions specified in paragraph (a) of this section were met, and does not identify both the laboratory and the amount the laboratory charged, payment will be based on the lowest charge at which the carrier estimates the test could have been secured from a laboratory serving the physician's locality. The carrier will estimate this lowest amount twice a year by (i) obtaining lists of charges laboratories make to physicians from as many commercial laboratories serving the carrier's area as possible (including laboratories in other States from which tests may be obtained by physicians in the carrier's service area) and (ii) establishing a schedule of lowest prices based on this information. The carrier will take into consideration specific circumstances, such as a need for emergency services that may be costlier than routine services, in making the estimate in a particular case. However, in no case may this estimate be higher than the lowest customary charge for commercial laboratories, or when applicable to the laboratory service, the lowest charge level determined in accordance with § 405.511, in the carrier's service area.
( d ) When a physician bills, in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, for a laboratory test and indicates that it was performed by an independent laboratory, a nominal payment will also be made to the physician for collecting, handling, and shipping the specimen to the laboratory, if the physician bills for such a service.
[46 FR 42672, Aug. 24, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 41351, Nov. 14, 1986]
##### 



Exhibit No. 23.2 Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP) The Board of Directors
United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-111503) on
Form S-3 and (333-36720 and 333-36722) on Form S-8 of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. of
our report dated March 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of United
Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, annual
report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Birmingham, Alabama
March 30, 2005
#### § 137.291 May Self-Governance Tribes carry out construction projects without assuming these Federal environmental responsibilities?

Yes, but not under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8]. Self-Governance Tribes may otherwise elect to perform construction projects, or phases of construction projects, under other legal authorities (see § 137.272).
40792.

#### KNIGHT v. SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Pannell, Judge.

1. “When an employee receives an injury for which compensation is payable under this Title, which injury was caused under circumstances creating a legal liability in some person other than the employer to pay damages in respect thereto, the employee or beneficiary may institute proceedings both against that person to recover damages and against the employer for compensation, but the amount of compensation to which he is entitled under this Title shall be reduced by the amount of damages recovered. If the employee or beneficiary of the employee in such case recovers compensation under this Title, the employer by whom the compensation was paid, or the party who was called upon to pay the compensation, shall be entitled to reimbursement from the person so liable to pay damages as aforesaid, and shall be subrogated to the right of the employee to recover from him to the extent of the compensation.” Ga. L. 1922, pp. 185, 186; 1937, pp. 528, 530; 211 Ga. 619 (88 SE2d 20). *Code Ann.*§ 114-403. While this section does not expressly authorize or provide for an action by the employer or insurance carrier against the employee to recover reimbursement from the employee, (who has recovered by judgment in a separate suit against the third party tortfeasor) up to the amount paid to the employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the employer or insurance carrier, because of the equities created under the terms of the above section, is in equity and good conscience entitled to recover as for money had and received for such reimbursement. *Branch & Howard v. Georgia Cas.**150*Co.,*39 Ga. App. 319, 323 (147 SE *144); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Luckey,*46 Ga. App. 593 (167 SE 907); *Travelers Ins. Co. v. Georgia Power Co.,*51 Ga. App. 579 (1c) (181 SE *111); Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Meisel,*85 Ga. App. 72, 74 (68 SE2d 384).

Decided July 16, 1964

Rehearing denied July 28, 1964.

*A. J. Whitehurst,*for plaintiff in error.

*Perry, Walters & Langstaff, S. B. Lippitt, Jr.,*contra.

2. While in cases of automobile collisions between two parties, both of whom suffer damage, and one of the parties, upon payment of a monetary consideration secures a release from the other, the release constitutes a settlement of the claims of both parties against each other, *Cochran v. Bell,*102 Ga. App. 617 (1) (117 SE2d 645), such rule has no application to> the present case, and the settlement entered into by the employer and insurer on the one hand and the employee on the other as to the claim of the employee for workmen’s compensation, does not constitute the settlement of any claim of the employer and insurer against the employee arising under the-section of the Workmen’s Compensation Act referred to in Headnote 1.

3. Upon application of the above rulings to the assignments of error in the present case, the trial court did not err in any of the rulings on demurrer and in granting a summary judgment against the employee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated January
31, 2003 with respect to the financial statements of Datakey, Inc. (the
"Company") included in this Form 10-KSB into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-64470, No. 33-14144, No. 33-47068,
No. 33-67280, No. 333-11405, No. 33-80894, No. 333-43937, No. 333-83999,
333-39556 and 333-91760 and on Form S-3 No. 333-58770, No. 333-56711, No.
333-84007, No. 333-91779, No. 333-90969, No. 333-94087 and No. 333-33332.


                                          /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 2003
§ 405.1134 Extension of time to file action in Federal district court. ( a ) Any party to the Council's decision or to a request for EAJR that has been certified by the review entity other than CMS may request that the time for filing an action in a Federal district court be extended.
( b ) The request must— ( 1 ) Be in writing.
( 2 ) Give the reasons why the action was not filed within the stated time period.
( 3 ) Be filed with the Council.
( c ) If the party shows that he or she had good cause for missing the deadline, the time period will be extended. To determine whether good cause exists, the Council uses the standards specified in § 405.942(b)(2) or (b)(3).
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 5124, Jan. 17, 2017]
HomeNepal

# Nepal

80 items

        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Trudeau Travels to Nepal, the United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan	  September 27, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Nepali Constitution Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy to Advance the Human Rights of LGBTQI+ Persons Stern’s Travel to Nepal and India	  August 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Nepal	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Nepal	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Nepal	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Nepal	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s travel to India and Nepal	  May 16, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 5, 2022	  Ned PriceMay 5, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 2, 2022	  Ned PriceMay 2, 2022Washington, D.C. 

previous page123456…8next page

Back to Top
§ 1003.100 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements sections 1128(c), 1128A, 1140, 1819(b)(3)(B), 1819(g)(2)(A), 1857(g)(2)(A), 1860D-12(b)(3)(E), 1860D-31(i)(3), 1862(b)(3)(C), 1867(d)(1), 1876(i)(6), 1877(g), 1882(d), 1891(c)(1); 1903(m)(5), 1919(b)(3)(B), 1919(g)(2)(A), 1927(b)(3)(B), 1927(b)(3)(C), and 1929(i)(3) of the Social Security Act; sections 421(c) and 427(b)(2) of Public Law 99-660; section 201(i) of Public Law 107-188 (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(c), 1320a-7a, 1320b-10, 1395i-3(b)(3)(B), 1395i-3(g)(2)(A), 1395w-27(g)(2)(A), 1395w-112(b)(3)(E), 1395w-141(i)(3), 1395y(b)(3)(B), 1395dd(d)(1), 1395mm(i)(6), 1395nn(g), 1395ss(d), 1395bbb(c)(1), 1396b(m)(5), 1396r(b)(3)(B), 1396r(g)(2)(A), 1396r-8(b)(3)(B), 1396r-8(b)(3)(C), 1396t(i)(3), 11131(c), 11137(b)(2), and 262a(i)); and section 3022 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj-52).
( b ) *Purpose.* This part— ( 1 ) Provides for the imposition of civil money penalties (CMPs) and, as applicable, assessments and exclusions against persons who have committed an act or omission that violates one or more provisions of this part; and
( 2 ) Sets forth the appeal rights of persons subject to a penalty, assessment, and exclusion.
[81 FR 88354, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42839, July 3, 2023]
# C_2005193EN.01003102.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/31

---

Action brought on 9 May 2005 by Asa Sundholm against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-197/05)

(2005/C 193/52)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 May 2005 by Asa Sundholm, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin Membiela, Albert Coolen and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision of the Commission establishing the applicant's Career Development Report for 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision of the Commission establishing the applicant's Career Development Report for 2003;

| 2. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her claim, the applicant points out, firstly, the existence of manifest inconsistencies between the points and the comments of the reporting officer, which constitute a breach of the obligation to give reasons.

The applicant further submits that there is a manifest error of assessment to the extent that she is criticised for having asked her hierarchical superiors for details of the way in which she should complete her work, without their having shown that those instructions had been previously laid down in such a way that they did not require clarification.

Finally, the applicant alleges infringement of her defence rights, submitting that the appeal assessor based his decision on new factors without affording her the opportunity of stating her point of view.

---
#### § 802.1107 Refilings.

The parties to a transaction shall not be required to pay an additional filing fee in the event that the Staff Chairperson permits the parties to withdraw and refile a notice under § 802.509(c)(2), unless the Staff Chairperson determines that a material change to the transaction has occurred, or a material inaccuracy or omission was made by the parties in information provided to the Committee, that requires the Committee to consider new information, in which case the Staff Chairperson will inform the parties in writing.
#### § 560.326 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

         WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CEO PURSUANT TO 18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350


                            CERITFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of PurchaseSoft, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven A. Flagg, President of the Company, certify, solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company as of August 31, 2006.

/s/ Steven A. Flagg
---------------------------

Steven A. Flagg, President and CEO
Dated: January 18, 2007
HomeNiger

# Niger

137 items

        -    Press Statement  		The United States Announces Humanitarian Assistance for the Sahel Crisis Response	  Ned PriceMarch 19, 2021 
        -    		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees and Vulnerable Populations in Burkina Faso, Mauritania, Niger, and Senegal	  March 16, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Niger Summary	   
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Niger	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Niger	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Niger	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Niger	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Niger	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Niger	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Niger	  June 21, 2019 

previous page1…1011121314next page

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1855-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1855-DR), dated August 14, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 24, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include Public Assistance in the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 14, 2009.

Trimble County for Public Assistance. Jefferson County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 44867)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-20889 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P