alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Poland

183 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 26, 2024Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick and Director Easterly’s Travel to Ukraine and Poland	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative for Ukraine’s Economic Recovery Pritzker Travel to Poland and Ukraine	  January 12, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		Pursuing Tech-Driven Solutions to Disrupt Trafficking in Cultural Property Worldwide	  January 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Ukraine, Poland, and Belgium	  December 18, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 13, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 13, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski	  December 13, 2023 

previous page1234…19next page

Back to Top
#### § 401.701 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this subpart implement section 1874(e) of the Social Security Act as it applies to Medicare data made available to qualified entities for the evaluation of the performance of providers and suppliers.
#### Vernon SELF v. RIVERSIDE COMPANIES, INC.

No. 67810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Riverside Companies, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Winn. 382 So.2d 1037.

Denied.
§ 594.311 Terrorism. The term *terrorism* means an activity that: ( a ) Involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and
( b ) Appears to be intended: ( 1 ) To intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
( 2 ) To influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
( 3 ) To affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.
# Morocco

163 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 11, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Minister Bourita of Morocco	  September 10, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Jake Tapper of CNN’s State of the Union	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 10, 2023New Delhi, India 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Jonathan Karl of ABC This Week	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 10, 2023New Delhi, India 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Earthquake in Morocco	  September 9, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Morocco Throne Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 30, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Morocco (23-728) – Protocol to Amend and Extend Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation	  July 28, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 18, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 18, 2023 

previous page123456…17next page

Back to Top
# Solomon Islands

57 items

        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Solomon Islands	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Opening of the U.S. Embassy in Honiara, Solomon Islands	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 1, 2023 
        -    Video Remarks  		Opening of the U.S. Embassy in Honiara, Solomon Islands	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 31, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Investing in the Future of the Pacific: U.S. Assistance Continues to Address WWII-era Explosive Hazards	  September 29, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Governance of the Seas: Assistance to Pacific Island Partners	  September 28, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Manele	  September 14, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 30, 2022	  Vedant PatelAugust 30, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 18, 2022	  Ned PriceAugust 18, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Remarks at Bloody Ridge	  Wendy R. ShermanAugust 8, 2022Honiara, Solomon Islands 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Deputy Secretary Sherman at a Press Availability in Honiara, Solomon Islands	  Wendy R. ShermanAugust 7, 2022Honiara, Solomon Islands 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Osvaldo ROLDAN-PALACIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10438.

D.C. No. CR-00-00079-ACK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

*458Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

MEMORANDUM2

Omar Osvaldo Roldan-Palacios appeals the judgment of conviction and his 46 month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien found in the U.S. in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Roldan-Palacios contends that in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) on the basis of a prior conviction for an aggravated felony that was not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Roldan-Palacios also contends that *Apprendi*renders inapplicable *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), *amended*(Feb.8, 2001) (order).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998         JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               82607                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                              0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     86071                   0
<PP&E>                                              252989                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      251203                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       90053                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              226,978                   0
<BONDS>                                                  0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         114102                   0
<COMMON>                                              8551                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (259,578)<F1>              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         90053                   0
<SALES>                                                  0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    167040              239520
<CGS>                                                    0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       389621              310062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    9663               24966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (232244)             (95508)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (232244)             (95508)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0                   0
<CHANGES>                                                0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (232244)             (95508)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.03)                .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.03)                .01
<FN>
<F1>
Additional paid in capital and retained earnings
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
696 A.2d 151

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Richard STRADER, II, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 16, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, BUT LIMITED to the following issue:

> whether the Super. Ct. erred in holding that the evidence should not be suppressed where the affidavit in support of the search warrant contained false statements about the reliability of the confidential informant, and whether counsel was ineffective for failure to move to suppress.

Additionally, this case is hereby REMANDED to the trial court so that a hearing may be conducted to determine whether the false information in question was knowingly included in the affidavit in support of the search warrant. Jurisdiction relinquished.
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES Order Number: 350862-3 

Registry Number: 1456802-88-2 

CA Index Name: 

Oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer \v.itb oxirane, monohexadecyl ether, phosphate, potassilllll salt 

CAS 

D 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CA5 has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210·0334 USA
# Malaysia

111 items

        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Malaysia	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Malaysia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Malaysia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Malaysia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Malaysia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    Report  		2019 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 7, 2019 
        -    Report  		Malaysia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Malaysia	  June 21, 2019 

previous page1…678910…12next page

Back to Top
Jan-13-2005 11.28 PM Office of Sen Susan Collins 202-228-0476 4/6 

# SADCoaratol

MARKETING SOUTHERN AROOSTOOK BuildingSoud1arnAroostookOMJob ntn Tima ·November 30,2011 The Honorable Raymond LaHood Secretary 

### C) oT- 

## o 

## ST-**~ud** 

## o -g'()\;)__

U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200New Jersey Ave, SB Washingtont DC 20590 RE: Essential Air Service oidders fortheNorthern Maine Regional Airport- Presque Isle, ME Dear Secretary LaHood: I am the Executive Director ofthe Southern Aroostook Development Corporation (SADC) located in Houlton. ME in Southern Aroostook County. We are a non-profit, private economic development organization. Houlton is located 45 miles south ofPresque Isle on U.S. Route 1. The Northern Maine Regional Airport plays a vital ro1e in the economic vitality of our region. We recently leamed of

### a new law that allows Essential 

### Air Service bidders 

### to submit proposals for 

### 8 seat aircraft. We are extremely concerned with this possible scenario from an economic standpoint. We have seen the airport continue to lose aircraft size and number offlights to the point a few years ago of 1 5 seat aircraft. While the business community did not like to see diminished size happen, they understood the reasoning. At least we had non-stop service to a hub. Our closest commercial airport, other than the Northern Maine Regional Airport, is in Bangor, ME. Bangor is ·120 miles south of Houlton and an even worse hardship for those located in Northern Aroostook County. They are 250 

### miles from the airport

.. This is what the citizens ofAroostook County would have to do ifthey want to make business trips, because 8 seat planes could not fly non-stop to important hubs such as Boston, JFK or LaGuardia. Imagine businessmen and women that fly on a regular basis and the hardship thjs would pose with their productivity and the increased expense. We are avery rural area and business attraction is ahuge enough challengewithoutthrowing this obstacle at us. We currently bring in site selectors to see the region and see what we have to offer

### to businesses looking to expand. hnagine the scenario where they 

### fly into some hub, then on to Bangor and then have to drive two to four hours to reach their destination because there isn't service from a hub directly to Presque Isle. Do you think this would make a favorable impression on the·site selector or even a CEO thatmightbe interested in locating here? On behalfofthe SADC Board ofDirectors, Iurge you to maintainthe currentstandard ofa 1 Sseatplane. Sincerelyyours,

## jl~**171;1~** Jon A. McLaughlin, Executive Director Southern Aroostook 

### Development Corp.

SOUTHERN AROOSTOOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATJON •P.O. Box 783 •Houlton, Maine 04730 •(207) 521..0157
Amendment Agreement to the Marketing Agent Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 UNITED STATES SHORT OIL FUND, LP 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MARKETING AGENT
AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 dated July 30, 2012 to the Marketing Agent Agreement by and among United States
Short Oil Fund, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Fund”), United States Commodity Funds LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as General Partner of the Fund (the “General Partner”) and ALPS Distributors, Inc., a
Colorado corporation (the “Marketing Agent”). 
 WITNESSETH 

WHEREAS, the Fund, the General Partner and the Marketing Agent entered into a Marketing Agent Agreement dated as of
June 8, 2009; and 
 WHEREAS, the Fund, the General Partner and the Marketing Agent wish to amend the
Marketing Agent Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein
contained, the Fund, General Partner and the Marketing Agent hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Notices. Section 10.7 of the Agreement entitled “Notices” is amended to change the address of the General Partner
effective August 1, 2012 to the following: 


 United States Commodity Funds LLC 

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1530 
 Oakland, California 94612 
  

	 	2.	Except as specifically set forth herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed as
of the date first written above. 
 UNITED STATES SHORT OIL FUND, LP 

 

	
	By: United States Commodity Funds LLC, as         General Partner
	
	/s/ Howard Mah
	Name: Howard Mah
	Title:   Management Director
	
	UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC
	
	/s/ Howard Mah
	Name: Howard Mah
	Title:   Management Director
	
	ALPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
	
	/s/ Thomas A. Carter
	Name: Thomas A. Carter
	Title:   President
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0057

JACE CADE ZEILER,

Petitioner and Appellant,

 V.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Appellee/Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

FILE BRIEF

Upon Motion of the Petitioner and Appellant, Jace Zeiler, for an extension 

of time to file his opening brief, and no objection being offered;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opening brief be due April 1, 2024.

Dated this _______ day March 2024.

______________________________

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2024

03/15/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0057
#### § 91.13 Weapons and explosives.

No person while on the property shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, except for official purposes.
# C_2005182EN.01004504.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/45

---

Partial Removal from the Register of Case T-122/05 (1)

1

(2005/C 182/86)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 24 May 2005, the President of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal of the name of the appliciant Marenzi Privatstiftung from the list of names of the applicants in Case T-122/05, Benkö and Others v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  Not yet published in the OJ.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7981

BILL DEAN BYRD, Defendant - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CR-99-013; CA-05-729) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bill Dean Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bill Dean Byrd seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of his constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Byrd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeUzbekistan

# Uzbekistan

116 items

        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (03-107) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  January 7, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (02-312) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Proliferation on Nuclear Materials and Technology	  March 12, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (01-605) – Agreement on Weapons Proliferation with Amendments	  June 5, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (99-504) – Defense Assistance Agreement	  May 4, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (12933) – Air Transport Agreement	  February 27, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (92-1028)- Agreement concerning Investment Incentive	  October 28, 1992 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01001902.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/19

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 June 2005

in Case T-297/03 Tomasetto Achille Sas di Tomasetto Andrea & C. v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - No disclosure of a document originating from a Member State without the prior consent of that State)

(2005/C 229/41)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-297/03: Tomasetto Achille Sas di Tomasetto Andrea & C., established in Castegnero (Italy), represented by M. Calabrese, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (agents: V. Di Bucci and P. Aalto, with A. Abate, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to a State aid scheme declared compatible with the common market by Commission decision of 12 July 2000 (SG (2000) D/105754 — State Aid N 715/99) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Sváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 1.11.2003.

1

---