alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeTunisia

# Tunisia

100 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Kenya, Tanzania, Nigeria, South Africa, Egypt, Tunisia, and Türkiye	  July 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Tunisia 	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 12, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Over 170 Business and Community Leaders from 49 Countries Convene in Washington, D.C. for the Spring Professional Fellows Congress, Advancing Governance and Society, Economic Empowerment, and Civic Engagement	  June 6, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tunisia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Statement on Arrests of Political Opponents in Tunisia	  Vedant PatelApril 19, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO, Ambassador Julianne Smith	  March 31, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs	  March 30, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Tunisia National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tunisia	  March 20, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
HomeGlobal Social Media Presence...Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of African Affairs

# 									Department of State Social Media Sites: Bureau of African Affairs							

## 								Bureau of African Affairs Social Media Sites							

        - Angola
        - Benin
        - Botswana
        - Burkina Faso
        - Burundi
        - Cabo Verde
        - Cameroon
        - Central African Republic
        - Chad
        - Comoros
        - Cote d’Ivoire
        - Democratic Republic of the Congo
        - Djibouti
        - Equatorial Guinea
        - Eritrea
        - Eswatini
        - Ethiopia
        - France
        - Gabon
        - Gambia
        - Ghana
        - Guinea
        - Guinea-Bissau
        - Kenya
        - Lesotho
        - Liberia
        - Madagascar
        - Malawi
        - Mali
        - Mauritania
        - Mauritius
        - Mozambique
        - Namibia
        - Niger
        - Nigeria
        - Republic of the Congo
        - Rwanda
        - Senegal
        - Sierra Leone
        - Somalia
        - South Africa
        - South Sudan
        - Sudan
        - Tanzania
        - Togo
        - Uganda
        - United States
        - Zambia
        - Zimbabwe

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3139 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3139

 To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 
Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the 
       ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 1996

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 
Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the 
       ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 245 Centereach 
Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31018 

Conference Calendar

__________________

WARREN S. MURPHY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., Sheriff;

K. WINFIELD, Lieutenant;

GARY BORDELON, Chief,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-94-1776-J-5

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Warren Murphy's motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) is DENIED as unnecessary. See FED. R. APP. P.

24(a).

Murphy contends that his disciplinary hearing did not comply

with the Due Process Clause and that his confinement in

administrative segregation also violated the Due Process Clause.

Murphy has not provided us with a copy of the trial

transcript, nor has he requested a copy at government expense. 

We therefore cannot review the district court's factual findings. 
No. 95-31018

-2-

Alizadeh v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 910 F.2d 234, 237 (5th Cir.

1990).

Regarding his argument that his disciplinary proceedings

were deficient, Murphy does not elaborate on his contention

beyond merely stating it. He has failed to brief the issue for

appeal and has abandoned it. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Murphy's placement in administrative segregation and the

conditions of administrative segregation were legitimately

related to the interest of prison officials in preventing escape. 

See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 538-39 (1979). Murphy's stay

in administrative segregation did not violate the Due Process

Clause.

Murphy's appeal is frivolous. We caution Murphy that any

additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Murphy

is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have

been previously decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. SANCTION WARNING

 ISSUED.
40829.

#### LAW v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was indicted in two counts, for knowingly receiving a stolen automobile *(Code Ann.*§ 26-2620) and for possessing an automobile knowing that the identification number had been altered with the intent to conceal the'identity of the automobile *(Code Ann.*§ 68-434a (d)). Both crimes are felonies. When the case was called for trial the defendant made a motion that the two counts of the indictment be severed and that .the State be required to elect which.count it would proceed to try. The defendant assigns error on the trial court’s overruling of this motion and of his motion for new trial. *Held:*

1. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion to require the State to elect to try one of the two counts of the indictment. When an indictment is drawn in more than one coiínt, each charging a crime of the same degree and the same nature, the State is not required to elect upon which count to try the defendant. *Bulloch v. State;*10 Ga. 46, 59; *Hoskins v. State,*11 Ga. 92, 95; *Williams v. State,*72 Ga. 180; *Sims v. State,*110 Ga. 290 (34 SE 1020); *Walker v. State,*118 Ga. 772 (45 SE 621); *Sutton v. State,*124 Ga. 815 (53 SE 381); *Mitchell v. State,*6 Ga. App. 554, 557 (65 SE 326); *Braxley v. State,*17 Ga. App. 196, 197 (86 SE 425); *Warren v. State,*32 Ga. App. 359 (123 SE 182); *Freeman v. State,*35 Ga. App. 223 (132 SE 782); *Benford v. State,*39 *365Ga. App. 826 (148 SE 608); *Gaulden v. State,*41 Ga. App. 635 (154 SE 209); *Webb v. State,*47 Ga. App. 505 (170 SE 827); *Ivester v. State,*75 Ga. App. 600 (44 SE2d 61).

Decided September 24, 1964.

*George G. Finch,*for plaintiff in error.

*William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, J. Robert Sparks, J. Walter LeCraio,*contra.

2. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial which was on the special ground that the trial court erred in admitting “certain testimony which defendant contends was illegally obtained, without the use of a search warrant” by which the defendant “was denied due process of law, under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” “A ground of a motion fo-r new trial which, in order to be understood requires a consideration of the evidence, must either set forth the evidence relied upon or point out where in the record such evidence may be found.” *Craig v. State,*105 Ga. App. 244 (124 SE2d 302); *Toler v. State,*213 Ga. 12, 13 (96 SE2d 593); *Thurmond v. State,*108 Ga. App. 641 (134 SE2d 511). “A ground of a motion for new trial complaining of the introduction of evidence that fails to show that any objection was made to the introduction of such evidence on the trial of the case is incomplete and cannot be considered.” *Perry v. State,*105 Ga. App. 776 (125 SE2d 666).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
# Spain

125 items

        -    Report  		Spain	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Spain	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Spain	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Spain	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Spain	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Spain	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Spain	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (15-925.1) – Defense Agreement on Research, Development, Test, Evaluation and Prototyping Projects	  September 25, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (15-616) – Amendment to Agreement of March 17, 2011 Concerning Space Mars Science Laboratory Mission	  June 16, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (13-1209) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement FATCA	  December 9, 2013 

previous page1…910111213next page

Back to Top
#### Floyd POLACO, Individually and d/b/a Floyd’s Foreign Car Service, Jerrie Thames Polaco and Excel Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Gloria Exie SMITH, Appellee.

No. NN-190.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 18, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1979.

G. Miles Davis of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellants.

John Peter Kirtz, Jr., Pensacola, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise two points as error. First they argue that the trial court erred in admitting the mortality tables into evidence and instructing the jury on pain and suffering. Appellants’ second argument is that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain of plaintiff’s medical bills without proper proof of their reasonableness or necessity.

We affirm as to both points.

Appellee was involved in an automobile accident and suffered a whiplash injury. There was conflicting evidence offered at trial regarding the permanency of her injuries and there was no definitive expert testimony that she suffered a permanent injury. However, appellee testified, *without objection,*that her injury was permanent.

We further note that appellants objected to the introduction of the mortality tables but did not object to the giving of Florida Standard Jury Instruction 6.9 on permanent injury and the use of the mortality tables.

It is well-settled that the failure to object waives the objection. *Sharpe v. Herman A. Thomas, Inc.,*294 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). *Cantor Associates, Inc. v. Blume,*106 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).

By their failure to object to appellee’s testimony and to the giving of the instruction on the mortality tables, appellants waived the right to now claim error.

Appellee also testified that she had incurred all of the medical bills as a result of the accident. Her doctors testified that they had prescribed the medicine for her. Her testimony alone was sufficient predicate for allowing the jury to resolve the *410question of whether the medical bills were reasonable or necessary. *Garrett v. Morris Kirschman and Company, Inc.,*336 So.2d 566 (Fla.1979), *Crowe v. Overland Hauling, Inc.,*245 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      4,783,900
<SECURITIES>                                  951,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,762,800
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,779,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45,400
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,733,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,779,000
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              232,700
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               47,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               174,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                      600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           174,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  174,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                      2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.03


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                This schecdule contains summary financial information
                extracted from form 10-Q for this period ended
                March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
                by reference to such form 10-Q.

</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0 
<INVENTORY>                                  0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                       0 
<DEPRECIATION>                               0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   72,312 
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0 
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 3,505 
<OTHER-SE>                                   0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 0
<SALES>                                      0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0 
<CGS>                                        0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         6,120  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (6,120) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (6,120) 
<DISCONTINUED>                               0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0 
<NET-INCOME>                            (6,120) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.00)


         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              344,922
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,500,480
<ALLOWANCES>                         26,000
<INVENTORY>                       1,328,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,178,374
<PP&E>                            4,669,948
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,917,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    4,598,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,098,366
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         375,000
<COMMON>                            316,114
<OTHER-SE>                        2,808,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      4,598,362
<SALES>                           5,866,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5,866,035
<CGS>                             3,522,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,522,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  5,255,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,909,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,909,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,909,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.80)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2921 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2921

   To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to provide that imported 
tomatoes are subject to packing standards contained in marketing orders 
    issued by the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1996

Mrs. Thurman (for herself, Mr. Foley, Mr. Canady of Florida, Ms. Brown 
 of Florida, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Deutsch, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Goss, Mr. 
 Johnston of Florida, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Mica, Mr. Peterson of 
  Florida, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Stearns, and Mr. Weldon of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to provide that imported 
tomatoes are subject to packing standards contained in marketing orders 
    issued by the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBJECTION OF IMPORTED TOMATOES TO PACKING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 8e(a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608e-
1(a)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``or maturity'' and inserting ``, 
                maturity, or (with respect to tomatoes) packing''; and
                    (B) by striking ``and maturity'' and inserting 
                ``maturity, and (with respect to tomatoes) packing''; 
                and
            (2) in the second sentence by striking ``and maturity'' and 
        inserting ``maturity, and (with respect to tomatoes) packing''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated March 9, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 509 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-251364) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 9, 2021
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1890. IN THE INTEREST OF: R. S. , A CHILD. 

Appellee hasfiled a Motion to Dismissthe appeal on the groundsthat appellant

has failed to file a brief. This case was docketed on June 4, 2015. Appellant’s brief

was due June 24, 2015. Rule 23 (a) of this Court states: “Appellant's brief . . . shall

be filed within 20 days after the appeal is docketed. Failure to file within that time,

unless extended upon motion for good cause shown, may result in the dismissal of the

appeal, and may subject the offender to contempt.” 

As of the date of this order, appellant has failed to file the brief and

enumerations of error. Upon consideration of appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, the same

is hereby granted.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/03/2015

August 03, 2015
#### § 597.502 Exclusion from licenses and authorizations.

The Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control reserves the right to exclude any person, property, or transaction from the operation of any license, or from the privileges therein conferred, or to restrict the applicability thereof with respect to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such action shall be binding upon all persons receiving actual or constructive notice of such exclusion or restriction.