alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Water resources of the Milwaukee area, Wisconsin

By: William James DrescherFrederick C. DreherPaul N. Brown

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir247

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1



DIVALL INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DiVall Income Properties 3 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                        |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                      |  |                                       
|Dated: March 22, 2004 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                                            
|                      |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge

standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP RESTAURANTS,
INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF OCTOBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
THE ITEMS RELATED TO EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM TO THE 
PROVISIONS OF SFAS NO. 128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE".
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000703799
<NAME> VICORP RESTAURANTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,510
<PP&E>                                         278,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,072
<BONDS>                                         19,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           458
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,990
<SALES>                                        322,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,527
<CGS>                                          101,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               187,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005182EN.01002001.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/20

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 26 April 2005

in Case C-149/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione in Ugo Fava v Comune di Carrara (1)

1

(Tax levied on marble extracted within municipal boundaries by reason of its transport out of the municipality - Articles 92(1) and 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Partial inadmissibility - Question identical to one upon which the Court has already ruled)

(2005/C 182/37)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-149/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation) (Italy), made by decision of 27 October 2003, received at the Court on 23 March 2004, in the proceedings between Ugo Fava (administrator of the insolvent company, IMEG Srl) and Comune di Carrara — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 26 April 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The reference for a preliminary ruling is inadmissible in so far as it relates to the interpretation of Articles 81 EC, 85 EC and 86 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The reference for a preliminary ruling is inadmissible in so far as it relates to the interpretation of Articles 81 EC, 85 EC and 86 EC;

| 2. | A proportional tax on goods by weight, levied in one municipality of a Member State only on a category of goods by reason of their transport out of the municipality, is a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty on exports within the meaning of Article 23 EC, notwithstanding the fact that the tax also applies to those goods whose final destination is within the Member State concerned; |
| --- | --- |

2.

A proportional tax on goods by weight, levied in one municipality of a Member State only on a category of goods by reason of their transport out of the municipality, is a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty on exports within the meaning of Article 23 EC, notwithstanding the fact that the tax also applies to those goods whose final destination is within the Member State concerned;

| 3. | Article 23 EC may not be relied upon in support of applications for the restitution of sums levied as the tax on marble prior to 16 July 1992 except by those applicants who had commenced legal proceedings or made an equivalent complaint prior to that date. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Article 23 EC may not be relied upon in support of applications for the restitution of sums levied as the tax on marble prior to 16 July 1992 except by those applicants who had commenced legal proceedings or made an equivalent complaint prior to that date.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Denmark’s Constitution Day

# 									Denmark’s Constitution Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 5, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Denmark as you celebrate Constitution Day.

Denmark is a close friend and Ally of the United States, and our countries’ relationship spans over two centuries of close cooperation rooted in shared democratic values.  Committed to freedom, collective security, and human rights, we are working together to defend against threats to democracy, address the climate crisis and other global challenges, and respond to the actions of regimes that seek to repress fundamental freedoms and undermine the international rules-based order.  As NATO Allies, we are strengthening transatlantic security and coordinating closely to hold Russia accountable for its unprovoked and unjustified war against Ukraine.  The United States looks forward to growing our strong partnership with the Kingdom of Denmark, including Greenland and the Faroe Islands, and to strengthening our vibrant people-to-people ties in the years to come.

I join you in celebrating this anniversary of the signing of the Danish Constitution and send best wishes for health and prosperity to all people in Denmark.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDenmarkOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Ronald S. GUNTHER, Respondent.

Nos. 59078, 59592.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 2, 1981.

Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, David G. McGunegle, Branch Staff Counsel and John B. Root, Jr., Bar Counsel, Orlando, and C. Brent McCaghren, Chairman, Ninth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee “B”, Winter Park, for complainant.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In these combined cases, The Florida Bar has charged respondent Ronald S. Gunther with a total of twenty-six counts of neglecting legal matters entrusted to him. In each of these counts, the referee found that respondent agreed to represent and collected *969legal fees from various clients on various legal matters, but that respondent thereafter failed to take any action on the clients’ behalf. It is clear from the report that the clients repeatedly attempted to contact respondent after their initial consultation and payment of fee but to no avail. No money was ever refunded.

Collectively, the referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), -102(A)(6), 5 — 105(A), -105(B), 6-101(A)(3), 7 — 101(A)(2), -101(A)(3), and 9-102(B)(4). The referee further recommended that respondent be disbarred for his actions.

Respondent made no appearance before the referee and has not sought review in this Court. Accordingly, the referee’s findings and recommendations are approved. Respondent, Ronald S. Gunther, is hereby disbarred, effective immediately. Execution shall issue against respondent for the cost of these proceedings in the amount of $1,005.36.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
40854.

#### BROWN v. WALL.

Decided September 21, 1964

Rehearing denied October 5, 1964.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit on account by an attorney to recover out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him while representing the defendant’s father in a damage suit. The defendant filed an answer in which he denied the indebtedness, and the case proceeded to trial before a jury who returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The court denied the defendant’s motion for new trial, and the exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

The evidence authorized the finding that the defendant orally agreed to pay the out-of-pocket expenses sued for in consideration of the plaintiff’s; undertaking to prosecute a damage suit for the defendant’s father. Whether the defendant’s agreement was within or without the operation of the Statute of Frauds *(Code*§ 20-401 (2)) is immaterial as this issue was not raised in the trial court by the filing of a plea of the Statute of Frauds and such issue cannot be raised for the first time in a ground of the motion for new trial. *Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.,*113 Ga. 681 (39 SE 503); *Hale v. Lipham,*64 Ga. App. 796 (14 SE2d 236). The trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial. See *Davis v. Tift,*70 Ga. 52, 53 (2a); *Pope v. Ellis,*34 Ga. App. 185 (129 SE 11); *Guy v. Riley,*51 Ga. App. 404 (180 SE 624).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*401
      *E. B. Shaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*Morton P. Levine,*contra.
HomeMorocco

# Morocco

163 items

        -    TIAS  		Morocco (99-922) – Agreement concerning Finance Investment Incentive	  September 22, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Morocco (95-316) – Agreement Concerning the Development of Trade and Investment Relations	  March 16, 1995 
        -    TIAS  		Morocco (93-623) – Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters	  June 23, 1993 

previous page1…151617

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- The Abraham Accords
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets
- Contact Us
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Political Affairs...Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs

# Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs leads U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa region through carefully administered diplomacy, advocacy, and assistance that advances the interests, safety, and economic prosperity of the American people. In cooperation with regional partners, we promote democratic values and foster a free, peaceful, and prosperous Middle East and North Africa. The Bureau uses diplomatic tools and public engagement to end conflict, highlight the value of education, and enhance respect for democratic institutions, including freedom of the press, human rights, religious liberty, and the rule of law. The United States will continue to work closely with its allies and partners in the region to further these mutual interests and counter extremist ideologies that seek to destabilize the region.				

Assistant Secretary

Barbara A. Leaf

							Follow Us:																			Twitter

## Countries & Areas

							Near East						

        -  Algeria 
        -  Bahrain 
        -  Egypt 
        -  Iran 
        -  Iraq 
        -  Israel 
        -  Jordan 
        -  Kuwait 
        -  Lebanon 
        -  Libya 
        -  Morocco 
        -  Oman 
        -  Palestinian Territories 
        -  Qatar 
        -  Saudi Arabia 
        -  Syria 
        -  Tunisia 
        -  United Arab Emirates 
        -  Yemen 

Back to Top
# North Korea

429 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 9, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: North Korea	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Democratic People's Republic of Korea	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Democratic People's Republic of Korea	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		North Korea	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…40414243next page

Back to Top
40509.

#### HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY v. HULSEY.

Decided October 8, 1964.

*Wheeler, Robinson & Thompson, B. Carl Buice,*for plaintiff in error.

*Telford, Wayne & Greer, Jeff C. Wayne, Dent Bostick,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Our judgment in this case, 109 Ga. App. 169 (135 SE2d 494), having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in *Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hulsey,*220 Ga. 240 (138 SE2d 310), we hereby vacate our judgment and enter another reversing the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in its opinion.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3049

To amend section 1505 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide

for the continuity of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of American

Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1996

Mr. GOODLING (for himself and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend section 1505 of the Higher Education Act of

1965 to provide for the continuity of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUITY OF BOARD.

4 Section 1505(i) of the Higher Education Amend5 ments of 1986 (20 U.S.C. 4412(i)) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the pe7 riod at the end of the first sentence the following:
2

•HR 3049 IH

1 ‘‘or to recommend another individual if the member

2 does not consent to be reappointed’’; and

3 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the

4 following:

5 ‘‘(2) If the President has not transmitted to the

6 Senate a nomination to fill the position of a member

7 covered by such a recommendation within 60 days

8 from the date that the member’s term expires—

9 ‘‘(A) if the member consents to reappoint10 ment, the member shall be deemed to have been

11 reappointed for another full term to the Board,

12 with all the appropriate rights and responsibil13 ities; or

14 ‘‘(B) if the member does not consent to re15 appointment, an individual recommended by the

16 Board under paragraph (1) shall be deemed to

17 have been appointed for a full term to the

18 Board with all the appropriate rights and re19 sponsibilities.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3034 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3034

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
extend for two months the authority for promulgating regulations under 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1996

   Mr. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
extend for two months the authority for promulgating regulations under 
                                the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS.

    Section 107(a)(2)(B) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450k(a)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``18 
months'' and inserting ``20 months''.
                                 <all>
```
# Tunisia

101 items

        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Tunisia	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on African Lion 22	  June 28, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 21, 2022	  Ned PriceJune 21, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Tunisia	  June 6, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing –  June 2, 2022	  Ned PriceJune 2, 2022WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Tunisia	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert’s Travel to Morocco and Tunisia	  May 10, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 26, 2022	  Ned PriceApril 26, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Tunisia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Visit to Tunisia	  March 27, 2022 

previous page1…34567…11next page

Back to Top
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Emivest Aerospace Corporation exemption acknowledgement letter.  Docket ID FAA-2010-1244.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2810 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2810

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that cafeteria 
plans which provide for grandfathered 401(k) plans may also provide for 
                  contributions to section 457 plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 1995

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that cafeteria 
plans which provide for grandfathered 401(k) plans may also provide for 
                  contributions to section 457 plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF SECTION 457 PLANS BY CAFETERIA PLANS WHICH ALSO 
              PROVIDE FOR 401(k) PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 125(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to cafeteria plans) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Exception for section 457 plans if 
                grandfathered 401(k) plans also offered.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Subparagraph (A) shall 
                        not apply to an eligible deferred compensation 
                        plan (as defined in section 457) provided for 
                        by a cafeteria plan (determined without regard 
                        to this paragraph), if such cafeteria plan also 
                        provides for a grandfathered 401(k) plan.
                            ``(ii) Grandfathered 401(k) plan.--For 
                        purposes of clause (i), the term `grandfathered 
                        401(k) plan' means a qualified cash or deferred 
                        arrangement (as defined in section 401(k)(2)) 
                        adopted by a State or local government (or 
                        political subdivision thereof) before May 6, 
                        1986.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to plan years beginning after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```