alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005155EN.01000602.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven by judgment of that court of 19 April 2005 in the proceedings between 1. Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, 2. Stichting Natuur en Milieu and College voor de Toelating van Bestrijdingsmiddelen; joined party: Bayer CropScience B.V.

(Case C-174/05)

(2005/C 155/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court for Trade and Industry) (Netherlands) of 19 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 April 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between 1. Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, 2. Stichting Natuur en Milieu and College voor de Toelating van Bestrijdingsmiddelen (Board for the Authorisation of Pesticides); joined party: Bayer CropScience B.V., on the following question:

Is Article 2(3) of Decision 2003/199/EC (1) valid?

1

---

(1)  Council Decision of 18 March 2003 concerning the non-inclusion of aldicarb in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance (OJ L 76 of 22 March 2003, p. 21).

1

---
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #29, July 23 - 29, 2008

1) Much of Afghanistan has received below normal

precipitation during the winter and spring, along

with an early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures above 38

°C) will affect the lowlands of Afghanistan and

continue to increase water evaporation.

During the end of the wet season, high temperatures 

depleted much of Afghanistan’s already below-normal 

snow pack 4 – 6 weeks earlier than normal. High 

temperatures have also led to increased evaporation 

from water reservoirs, threatening water availability for 

agriculture. Temperature anomalies have eased since 

the beginning of July, although temperatures remain 

moderately above normal (Figure 2). 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan was below 

average from October - May as well and, as a result, 

underground water sources, used for both drinking water 

and irrigation, have not been replenished. The 

cumulative effects of high temperatures and low rainfall 

have had a direct bearing on most households, who rely 

on agriculture and livestock for their income and food 

needs. Light rainfall has continued along the Pakistan 

border (Figure 3). 

During the coming week temperatures will remain 

warmer than average, but anomalies will not be as large, 

for the upcoming week. Significant rainfall will not return 

until October. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan as of July 16, 

2008 

Figure 2. Temperature anomalies for the second 

dekad of July 2008 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS

Figure 3. Total estimated rainfall July 14 – 20, 2008 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA
§ 124.5 Grant evaluation and award. ( a ) ( 1 ) Within the limits of funds available for such purpose, the Secretary may award grants under this subpart for project costs to applicants with approvable applications therefor which will, in his judgment, best promote the purposes of section 1625 of the Act, taking into consideration: ( i ) The severity and seriousness of the safety hazard, licensure or accreditation problem or problems.
( ii ) The relative need of the population to be served for the services to be provided, including the availability of alternatives for meeting the need.
( iii ) The financial need of the applicant.
( iv ) The extent to which the facility will serve persons below the poverty level, as determined by the Secretary of Commerce.
( v ) The extent to which the project will foster cost containment or improve the quality of care through enhanced efficiency and productivity.
( 2 ) Priority for funding shall be based on the extent to which services will be made available relative to the cost of the project.
( b ) The amount of any grant under this subpart may not exceed 75 percent of the cost of the project for which the grant is made unless the project is located in an area determined by the Secretary to be an urban or rural poverty area, in which case the grant may, as determined by the Secretary, cover up to 100 percent of such costs.
( c ) If an applicant has not entered into a legally enforceable fixed price contract for the project for which funds are awarded under this subpart within 180 days of the date of the grant award, the grant award will automatically become null and void.
( d ) Where a grant has been awarded to an applicant under this subpart on the condition that any applicable certificates of need and section 1122 finding required under § 124.4(f) will be provided, if such certificates and finding have not been received by the Secretary within 180 days of the grant award, the grant award will automatically become null and void.
122 STAT. 3534 PUBLIC LAW 110–320—SEPT. 18, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2403: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–824 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

June 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House, amended. 

Sept. 9, Senate concurred in House amendments. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–320 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located in the 700 block of East Broad 

Street, Richmond, Virginia, as the ‘‘Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert R. 

Merhige, Jr., United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse located in the 700 block of East 

Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr., 

United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr., United 

States Courthouse’’. 

Approved September 18, 2008. 

Sept. 18, 2008 

[S. 2403] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.16 Maturity.

The maturity date for retirement savings bonds is indeterminate and may be different for each bond issued, but shall not exceed the sum of an original maturity period of 20 years and an extended maturity period of 10 years. A retirement savings bond purchased by the IRA custodian on behalf of a participant will mature at the earlier of 30 years from the date the bond is first issued to the custodian on behalf of the participant or when its value reaches $15,000.

[82 FR 6246, Jan. 19, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imaging Technologies Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  February  13,  2004

/s/  Brian  Bonar
-----------------
Brian  Bonar
Chairman,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
HomeSpain

# Spain

125 items

        -    TIAS  		Spain (12949) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  May 5, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (12882) – Implementing Arrangement on Cooperation in Research on Radiological Evaluations	  September 15, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (12858) – Memorandum of Understanding on Scientific and Technological Cooperation in the Field of Water Resources Development	  May 20, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (94-509) – Agreement on Space Cooperation	  May 9, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Spain (91-401) – Employment Agreement	  April 1, 1991 

previous page1…111213

Back to Top
#### § 21.23 False statements as disqualification.

Willfully false statements shall be cause for rejection of the application or, as provided in subpart N of this part, for dismissal.
HomePanama

# Panama

159 items

        -    TIAS  		Panama (13160) – Agreement Regarding the Status of United States Personnel Who May be Temporarily Present in Panama	  July 10, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (01-510) – Protocol amending the 1982 Treaty concerning the Treatment and Protection of Investments	  May 10, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (13091) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  July 12, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (13043) – Agreement Concerning the Use of Corozal Cemetery	  June 27, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (98-1228) – Air Transport Agreement	  December 28, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (95-906) – Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty	  September 6, 1995 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (91-530) – Treaty Concerning the Treatment and Protection of Investments	  May 30, 1991 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (88-222) – Agreement on Law Enforcement of Support Obligations	  February 22, 1988 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (86-911) – Taxation of Income of Contractors of the Panama Canal Commission	  September 11, 1986 

previous page1…141516

Back to Top
#### Herbert F. TAPPAN v. Carle COOPER.

No. 51780.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 19, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1980.

Michael D. Haas, Bay St. Louis, for appellant.

Smith, Smith, Tate & Stuart, M. D.’Tate, II, Williams, Smith & McDonald, Claiborne McDonald, IV, Picayune, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Pearl River County; Michael Sullivan, Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED ON DIRECT AND CROSS-APPEAL.
#### Lisa RUDEN, Petitioner, v. Donald B. MEDALIE, Respondent.

No. 45737.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed.
HomeGrenada

# Grenada

55 items

        -    TIAS  		Grenada (18-406) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  April 6, 2018 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Grenada Open Skies Agreement of February 1, 2018	  February 1, 2018 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Grenada Memorandum of Consultations of February 1, 2018	  February 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Grenada	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Grenada	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Grenada	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		INCLE-CBSI Activities – Summative Evaluation (Summary)	  September 18, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Grenada (13-426) – Defense Agreement Regarding the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative	  April 26, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Grenada (05-1209) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  December 9, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Grenada (04-311) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  March 11, 2004 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
§ 1008.39 Additional information. ( a ) If the request for an advisory opinion does not contain all of the information required by § 1008.36 of this part, or the OIG believes it needs more information prior to rendering an advisory opinion, the OIG may, at any time, request whatever additional information or documents it deems necessary. The time period for the issuance of an advisory opinion will be tolled from the time the OIG requests the additional information from the requestor until such time as the OIG determines that it has received the requested information.
( b ) The OIG may request additional information before or after the request for an advisory opinion has been accepted.
( c ) Additional information should be provided in writing and certified to be a true, correct and complete disclosure of the requested information in a manner equivalent to that described in § 1008.38 of this part.
( d ) In connection with any request for an advisory opinion, the OIG or DoJ may conduct whatever independent investigation they believe appropriate.
( e ) Requesting parties are required to notify the OIG if they request an advisory opinion in accordance with part 411 of this title from CMS about the arrangement that is the subject of their advisory opinion request.
( f ) Where appropriate, after receipt of an advisory opinion request, the OIG may consult with the requesting parties to the extent the OIG deems necessary.
[62 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 38325, July 16, 1998]
#### § 137.96 Does the Prompt Payment Act apply to funds transferred to a Self-Governance Tribe in a compact or funding agreement?

Yes, the Prompt Payment Act, 39 U.S.C. section 3901 *et seq.,* applies to the transfer of all funds due under a compact or funding agreement authorized pursuant to Title V. See also § 137.76 through 137.78 and 137.341(f).
§ 110.92 No additional judicial or administrative review of determinations made under this part. ( a ) Under section 319F-4(b)(4) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6e(b)(4)) (referencing section 262 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 239a)), no judicial review of the Secretary's actions concerning eligibility and benefits determinations under this part (including, but not limited to, determinations concerning eligibility, the type or amount of benefits, and the method of payment of benefits) is permitted. In addition, no further administrative review of such actions are permitted unless the President specifically directs otherwise.
( b ) Under section 319F-4(b)(5)(c) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6e(b)(5)(c)), no judicial review of the Secretary's actions in establishing or amending a Table (or Tables) for purposes of this part (which include, but are not limited to, identifying injuries on a Table (or choosing not to identify injuries on a Table), establishing time-frames or definitions for Table injuries, and amending a Table) is permitted.
§ 551.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *United Nations Participation Act.* The exemption described in this section does not apply to transactions involving property or interests in property of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c(b)) (UNPA). Note 1 to paragraph ( a ).
Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the UNPA include those listed on *both* OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) and the Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List (UN List) (see *https://www.un.org*), as well as persons listed on the SDN List for being owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, persons listed on *both* the SDN List and the UN List.
( b ) *Personal communications.* Th prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
§ 8.35 Assistance from disbarred or suspended persons and former Treasury employees. No attorney, certified public accountant or enrolled practitioner shall, in practice before the Bureau, knowingly and directly or indirectly: ( a ) Employ or accept assistance from any person who is under disbarment or suspension from practice before any agency of the Treasury Department;
( b ) Accept employment as associate, correspondent, or subagent from, or share fees with, any such person;
( c ) Accept assistance in a specific matter from any person who participated personally and substantially in the matter as an employee of the Treasury Department.
[44 FR 47059, Aug. 10, 1979]
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40955

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIPE ANTONIO NUNEZ-MARTINEZ, also known as Felipe A Martinez, also

known as Felipe Nunez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-587-ALL

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe Antonio

Nunez-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Nunez-Martinez has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40955

2

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### § 8.65 Depositions.

Depositions for use at a hearing may, with the written approval of the Administrative Law Judge, be taken by either the Director of Practice or the respondent or their authorized representatives. Depositions may be taken upon oral or written questioning, upon not less than 10 days' written notice to the other party before any officer authorized to administer an oath for general purposes or before an officer or employee of the Bureau authorized to administer an oath pursuant to 27 CFR 70.35. The written notice will state the names of the witnesses and the time and place where the depositions are to be taken. The requirement of 10 days' notice may be waived by the parties in writing, and depositions may then be taken from the persons and at the times and places mutually agreed to by the parties. When a deposition is taken upon written questioning, any cross-examination will be upon written questioning. Copies of the written questioning will be served upon the other party with the notice, and copies of any written cross-interrogation will be mailed or delivered to the opposing party at least 5 days before the date of taking the depositions, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. A party on whose behalf a deposition is taken must file it with the Administrative Law Judge and serve one copy upon the opposing party. Expenses in the reproduction of depositions will be borne by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.
#### § 578.309 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
No. 99-478.

#### Apprendi *v.*New Jersey.

Sup. Ct. N. J. Cer-tiorari granted.
# C_2005217EN.01000401.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 2 June 2005

in Case C-378/02: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad in Waterschap Zeeuws Vlaanderen v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (1)

1

(VAT - Capital goods acquired by a body governed by public law - Public authority - Transaction engaged in as taxable person and transaction engaged in as non-taxable person - Right to adjustment and deduction)

(2005/C 217/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-378/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Hoge Raad (Netherlands), made by decision of 18 October 2002, received at the Court on 21 October 2002, in the proceedings between Waterschap Zeeuws Vlaanderen and Staatssecretaris van Financiën — the Court (Third Chamber) composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General, M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

A body governed by public law which purchases capital goods as a public authority within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 4(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, that is to say as a non-taxable person, and subsequently sells those goods as a taxable person, is not entitled, in respect of that sale, to a right of adjustment based on Article 20 of that directive in order to deduct the VAT paid on the purchase of those goods.

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 11.01.2003.

1

---
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/  Thomas S. Smith
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Thomas S. Smith
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Dated: February 14, 2005
```