alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSenegal

# Senegal

109 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Senegalese Foreign Minister Tall Sall	  June 17, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Senegalese Foreign Minister Aïssata Tall Sall Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 17, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Senegal	  June 2, 2022 
        -    		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Foreign Ministers from Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritania, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, and Senegal Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 18, 2022United Nations HeadquartersNew York, New York 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Senegal	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Senegal National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Senegalese President and African Union Assembly Chairperson Sall	  March 3, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Acting Coordinator for Global COVID-19 Response and Health Security Mary Beth Goodman	  Digital Press Briefing with Acting Coordinator for Global COVID-19 Response and Health Security Mary Beth GoodmanFebruary 15, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Senegal	  December 16, 2021 
        -    		U.S.-Africa: Enduring Partnership	  November 23, 2021 

previous page1…45678…11next page

Back to Top
40621.

#### HULSEY v. THE STATE.

Decided March 13, 1964.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant assigns error on the overruling of his motion for new trial, on the general grounds, after his conviction for possessing nontax-paid liquor in violation of *Code Ann.*§ 58-1056.

There was evidence that nontax-paid whiskey, in the same kind of containers as containers found at the defendant’s house, was found on seemingly dead-end paths beginning at the defendant’s house. The defendant made a statement at the trial, which was undisputed, that he only rented his house and the land belonged to someone else and there was another house one-fourth of a mile away rented by another tenant. There was testimony that after the whiskey was found and the defendant was arrested he said to law enforcement officers “You all caught me a little far off this time; when you catch me right I always plead guilty, but I am going to have to go to trial on this.” This incriminating admission by the defendant was also circumstantial evidence. *Pressley v. State,*201 Ga. 267, 272 (39 SE2d 478); *Austin v. State,*100 Ga. App. 147, 149 (110 SE2d 434); *Sheffield v. State,*107 Ga. App. 610, 612 (131 SE2d 76); *Ledford v. State,*215 Ga. 799, 805 (113 SE2d 628); Green, Georgia Law of Evidence, 534, § 246.

This case does not fall within that class of cases where the conviction was held unauthorized because the nontax-paid whiskey was so located that others than the defendant might equally have had access to it. *Harris v. State,*86 Ga. App. 607 (71 SE2d 861); *Walker v. State,*90 Ga. App. 183 (82 SE2d 258). All the facts and circumstances in evidence, including the defendant’s admission, supported the conviction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*

*352
      *James I. Parker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wayne W. Gammon, Solicitor,*contra.
#### Commonwealth v. One 1950 Mercury Sedan

*Russell Wismer,*for Commonwealth.

June 18, 1954.

Alessandroni, J.,

This is a petition by the Commonwealth for the forfeiture of one 1950 Mercury sedan used by its owner in transporting untaxed whiskey from Washington, D. C., to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in violation of the provisions of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code of April 12, 1951, P. L. 90.

The hearing developed the following facts, culled from the simple narrative of McKeon’s widow, who appeared alone and unrepresented by counsel. John C. McKeon, presumptive owner and driver of the car, had lived an exemplary life. He had worked for the *525Bell Telephone Company for 33 years, when he suffered a complete nervous breakdown. During the holiday season he asked his wife if she wanted to take her baby for a ride to his sister’s place in Washington, D. C. While on that visit, without his wife’s knowledge, he purchased a quantity of liquor to bring back home for the holidays. After he crossed into Pennsylvania he was apprehended by the police. His arrest, the nervous breakdown along with the disgrace and humiliation attendant upon his apprehension, so worried and preyed upon his mind, that he committed suicide by hanging.

It is generally admitted that prior to this tragic experience, McKeon had lived what might be described as a model life. He had never run afoul of the law. He had never engaged directly or indirectly in the sale of untaxed liquor. His act apparently was not done with willful intent to defraud the Commonwealth of taxes. In anticipation of a party to be given upon the graduation of his son, seeking possibly the advantages of a bargain purchase, he fell prey to the temptation of the moment. It is also uncontradicted that Mrs. McKeon contributed her own funds to purchase the automobile.

The deeply moving facts of this case must be weighed against the letter of the law. A literal interpretation of the act would require confiscation of the car for the use of the Commonwealth. The error made by McKeon in a moment of weakness, culminating in suicide, has cost the widow her husband and leaves her with a future of sombre memories. Having seen Mrs. McKeon and listened to her story, told with restraint and resignation, the court feels the ends of justice will be better served by an order restoring the car to her.

*Order*

And now, to wit, June 18,1954, the Commonwealth’s petition for a forfeiture is dismissed. The seized 1950 *526Mercury sedan, manufacturer’s serial no. 50ME7717-6M, is hereby ordered to be returned to Katherine McKeon.
Dear Mr. Tipton:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−3168). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/26/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  June 30,  2004 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.




                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  August 12, 2004
#### STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Keith HARKINS, a minor, by and through his mother Nancy Harkins, and Nancy Harkins, Individually, et al., Respondents.

No. 74-1158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

BRIAN PAUL COSSEY,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 301 91

D.C. No. 9:09

- cr

- 00009

- DWM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2016 **

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Brian Paul Cossey appeals from the district court’ s judgment and challenges

a special condition of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Cossey contends that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 30191

condition of supervised release that prohibits him from acquiring, possessing , or

viewing materials that depict “sexually explicit conduct

, ” as defined in 18 U.S.C.

§ 2256(2) (A)

, and deemed inappropriate by Cossey’s probation officer and sex

offender treatment provider

. W e have approved a number of conditions related to

sex of fenders. However, consistent with our sister circuits, we recently held that a

condition that extends to non

- pornographic materials involving adults deprives a

defendant of more liberty than is reasonably necessary

. See United States v.

Gnirke, 775 F.3d 1155 , 116 5

- 6 6 (9th Cir. 2015). We, therefore, vacate the

condition as written and remand for the district court to reimpose the condition

consistent with Gnirke. See id. at 1166.

VACATED and REMANDED.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-10-00268-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: CROS MEDRANO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Cros Medrano, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on

May 5, 2010 through which he sought to compel the trial court to rule on his motion for

nunc pro tunc judgment. Relator has now filed an “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss” this

original proceeding on grounds that the trial court has already granted the requested relief

and the petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered moot. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and relator’s unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss
should be granted. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex.

2005) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any

stage of the legal proceedings . . .”); State Bar of Texas v. Gomez, 891 S.W.2d 243, 245

(Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real

controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought).

Accordingly, we GRANT the unopposed motion to dismiss and DISMISS the petition for

writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

28th day of May, 2010.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2924

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To guarantee the timely payment of social security benefits

in March 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TIMELY PAYMENT OF MARCH 1996 SOCIAL SE4 CURITY BENEFITS GUARANTEED.

5 (a) FINDINGS.—
2

HR 2924 RDS

1 (1) Congress intends to pass an increase in the

2 public debt limit before March 1, 1996.

3 (2) In the interim, social security beneficiaries

4 should be assured that social security benefits will be

5 paid on a timely basis in March 1996.

6 (b) GUARANTEE OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT

7 PAYMENTS.—In addition to any other authority provided

8 by law, the Secretary of the Treasury may issue under

9 chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, obligations of

10 the United States before March 1, 1996, in an amount

11 equal to the monthly insurance benefits payable under title

12 II of the Social Security Act in March 1996.

13 (c) OBLIGATIONS EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DEBT

14 LIMIT.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Obligations issued under

16 subsection (b) shall not be taken into account in ap17 plying the limitation in section 3101(b) of title 31,

18 United States Code.

19 (2) TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION—Paragraph

20 (1) shall cease to apply on the earlier of—

21 (A) the date of the enactment of the first

22 increase in the limitation in section 3101(b) of

23 title 31, United States Code, after the date of

24 the enactment of this Act, or
3

HR 2924 RDS

1 (B) March 15, 1996.

Passed the House of Representatives February 1,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
§ 1003.1540 Judicial review. ( a ) Section 1128A(e) of the Act authorizes judicial review of a penalty, an assessment, or an exclusion that has become final. The only matters subject to judicial review are those that the respondent raised pursuant to 42 CFR 1005.21, unless the court finds that extraordinary circumstances existed that prevented the respondent from raising the issue in the underlying administrative appeal.
( b ) A respondent must exhaust all administrative appeal procedures established by the Secretary or required by law before a respondent may bring an action in Federal court, as provided in section 1128A(e) of the Act, concerning any penalty, assessment, or exclusion imposed pursuant to this part.
( c ) Administrative remedies are exhausted when a decision becomes final in accordance with 42 CFR 1005.21(j).
§ 589.342 U.S.-registered broker or dealer in securities. The term *U.S.-registered broker or dealer in securities* means any U.S. citizen, permanent resident alien, or entity organized under the laws of the United States or of any jurisdiction within the United States (including its foreign branches), or any agency, office, or branch of a foreign entity located in the United States, that: ( a ) Is a “broker” or “dealer” in securities within the meanings set forth in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
( b ) Holds or clears customer accounts; and
( c ) Is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
HomeSerbia

# Serbia

125 items

        -    Media Note  		Congratulations to Belgrade, Serbia for Winning Expo 2027 Vote	  June 21, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Detention of Kosovo Police	  Matthew MillerJune 17, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs and Special Representative to the Western Balkans	  Gabriel EscobarJune 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 15, 2023	  Matthew MillerJune 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Serbia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 5, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Condemning Violence Against KFOR and Escalatory Actions in Northern Kosovo	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 30, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Joint Statement on Violence in the North of Kosovo	  May 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Serbia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs and Special Representative to the Western Balkans	  Gabriel EscobarMay 3, 2023 

previous page123456…13next page

Back to Top
# Docket Number FAA

- 2013

- 0216

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Perso n Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada G o r danko Jeremic

(613) 952

- 4379 11 / 5

/ 12 No Objections

Bombardier

Aerospace C h e s t er Liburski

8 5 5

- 5 001 Ext28 4 82 11 / 5

/ 1 2 No Objections

Regional Airline

Association Sc o tt Foose

202

- 36 7

- 1170

F

oos e @ raa.org 11 / 5

/ 1 2 No Objections
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 2-867474, No. 2-91907, No. 2-98732, No. 33-6188, No.
33-6203, No. 33-13265, No. 33-17720, No. 33-30385, No. 33-30386, No. 33-36249,
No. 33-41999, No. 33-42000, No. 33-53054, No. 33-66548, No. 33-66546, No.
33-55631, No. 33-55633, No. 33-66697, No. 33-59981, No. 33-59985, No. 33-59987,
No. 333-12887, No. 333-34285, No. 333-57563, No. 333-62159, No. 333-74627, No.
333-81433, No. 333-81435, No. 333-81437, No. 333-90951, No. 333-95421, No.
333-38746, No. 333-42888, No. 333-43306, No. 333-46436, No. 333-52050, No.
333-53584, No. 333-57152, No. 333-62960, No. 333-66238, No. 333-66240, No.
333-69380, No. 333-71900) and related S-8 prospectuses of LSI Logic Corporation
of our report dated January 23, 2002, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears on page 82 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

-s- PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 25, 2002
# C_2005171EN.01000102.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 3 May 2005

in Joined Cases C-387/02, C-391/02 and C-403/02: References for preliminary rulings from the Tribunale di Milano and the Corte d'appello di Lecce in the criminal proceedings against Silvio Berlusconi, Sergio Adelchi, Marcello Dell'Utri and Others (1)

1

(Company law - Article 5 of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 5 of the EC Treaty, in turn Article 10 EC) and Article 54(3)(g) of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 54(3)(g) of the EC Treaty, in turn, after amendment, Article 44(2)(g) EC) - First Directive 68/151/EEC, Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC and Seventh Directive 83/349/EEC - Annual accounts - Principle of a true and fair view - Penalties provided for in cases of false information on companies (false accounting) - Article 6 of First Directive 68/151 - Requirement that penalties for breaches of Community law be appropriate)

(2005/C 171/02)

Language of the cases: Italian

In Joined Cases C-387/02, C-391/02 and C-403/02: references for preliminary rulings under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale di Milano (C-387/02 and C-403/02) and the Corte d'appello di Lecce (C-391/02) (Italy), made by decisions of 26 October 2002, 29 October 2002 and 7 October 2002, received at the Court on 28 October 2002, 12 November 2002 and 8 November 2002 respectively, in the criminal proceedings against Silvio Berlusconi (C-387/02), Sergio Adelchi (C-391/02), Marcello Dell'Utri and Others (C-403/02) — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President of the Chamber, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), A. Rosas and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus and E. Levits, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

In a situation such as that in issue in the main proceedings, First Council Directive 68/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the Community, cannot be relied on as such against accused persons by the authorities of a Member State within the context of criminal proceedings, in view of the fact that a directive cannot, of itself and independently of national legislation adopted by a Member State for its implementation, have the effect of determining or increasing the criminal liability of those accused persons.

---

(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.01.2003.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0404 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CIMMARON STEVEN DRENNAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 6 2021

12/06/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0404
#### § 598.304 Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act.

The term *Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act* means the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, Pub. L. 106-120, title 8, 113 Stat. 1606, 1626-1636 (codified at 21 U.S.C. 1901-1908, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(C)).
#### § 596.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, to licensing procedures (including those pursuant to statements of licensing policy), and to other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.

[62 FR 45112, Aug. 25, 1997]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL