alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uzbekistan

117 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Uzbekistan	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu’s Travel to the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan	  May 22, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Uzbekistan	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Uzbekistan Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 9, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Central Asian Foreign Ministers	  February 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Uzbekistan	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement between the United States and Uzbekistan Following the Inaugural Meeting of the Strategic Partnership Dialogue	  December 13, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu’s Travel to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan	  December 10, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Uzbekistan Presidential Election	  Ned PriceOctober 25, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Uzbekistan President Mirziyoyev	  October 4, 2021 

previous page1…45678…12next page

Back to Top
#### § 535.580 Necessary living expenses of relatives of the former Shah of Iran.

The transfer, payment or withdrawal of property described in § 535.217 is authorized to the extent necessary to pay living expenses of any individual listed in that section. Living expenses for this purpose shall include food, housing, transportation, security and other personal expenses.

(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26685; E.O. 12284, 46 FR 7929)

[46 FR 14330, Feb. 26, 1981]
§ 591.509 Official business of the United States Government. All transactions that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized. Note 1 to § 591.509 :
For additional information regarding requirements relating to the entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 591.201, *see* § 591.407.
[84 FR 64417, Nov. 22, 2019]
HomeBelize

# Belize

71 items

        -    TIAS  		Belize (13089) – Treaty on Extradition	  March 27, 2001 

previous page1…678

Back to Top
§ 7.3 Responsibilities of heads of offices. ( a ) Heads of bureaus or offices in the Department shall be responsible for determining initially whether the results of research, development, or other activity of an employee within that bureau or office constitute an invention which falls within the purview of Executive Order 10096, as amended, and is to be handled in accordance with the regulations in this part.
( b ) Heads of bureaus or offices are responsible for obtaining from the employee the necessary information and, if the determination under paragraph (a) of this section is affirmative, preparing on behalf of the bureau or office a description of the invention and its relationship to the employee's duties and work assignments.
( c ) Heads of bureaus or offices, after such examination and investigation as may be necessary, shall refer to the General Counsel all information obtained concerning the invention and such determination as the head of the bureau or office has made with respect to the character of the activity as an invention. These reports shall include any determination as to the giving of a cash award to the employee for his performance relating to that invention.
#### Simon Roth, Respondent, *v.*Eva Phillips, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

March, 1898.)

Discontinuance of an action — Consideration.

An answer, interposed to an action for goods sold, which alleges that, subsequent touts commencement, the plaintiff agreed to discontinue it upon the defendant’s promise to pay the debt in weekly installments and, until it was paid, to purchase from the plaintiff alone all goods required in the defendant’s business and which the plaintiff sold, presents, When accompanied by allegations of the defendant’s willingness to perform and the plaintiff’s refusal, a perfect defense to the action.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff by. direction jof the court.

Max D. Steuer, for appellant.

Hastings & Gleason, for respondent.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J.

The complaint alleged the sale and delivery of goods to. the debtor, the answer admitted such sale and delivery and as a defense alleged that, subsequent to the commencement of the action, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement whereby the defendant agreed to pay the debt in question in installments of $25 each week, commencing on the 23d day of November, 1897, and also agreed to purchase from the plaintiff ¡all goods needed by her in her business which were sold by him and from ho ether person until said debt was fully paid. That, in consideration of such covenants on the defendant’s part, the plaintiff agreed to discontinue this action and settle the same. The answer further alleged that the defendant fully performed said contract on her part and that the plaintiff failed and refused to perform said contract on his part. The trial justice upon the plaintiff’s motion, directed a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. upon, the ground that the 'answer presented no- defense, and in so doing we think he committed error. ' That part of the answer which alleged “that it was agreed by the defendant that, if the plaintiff would discontinue and settle this action that defendant *241would purchase goods from plaintiff and fwould trade with him and buy whatever she required in her line, and that defendant did in pursuance of such agreement purchase goods from plaintiff and was ready and willing to further purchase goods and that said action was thereby settled and should have been discontinued,” presented in our judgment a legal defense, which, if established, would have entitled the defendant to a dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed und a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs toi appellant to abide event.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
§ 124.607 Agreements with State agencies. ( a ) Where the Secretary finds that it will promote the purposes of this subpart, and the State agency is able and willing to do so, he may enter into an agreement with the State agency for the State agency to assist him in administering this subpart in the State.
( b ) Under an agreement, the State agency will provide the Secretary with any assistance he requests in any one or more of the following areas, as set out in the agreement: ( 1 ) Investigation of complaints of noncompliance;
( 2 ) Monitoring the compliance of facilities with the requirements of this subpart;
( 3 ) Review of affirmative action plans submitted under § 124.606(b);
( 4 ) Review of reports submitted under § 124.605;
( 5 ) Making initial decisions for the Secretary with respect to compliance, subject to appeal by any party to the Secretary or review by the Secretary on his own initiative; and
( 6 ) Application of any sanctions available to it under State law (such as license revocation or termination of State assistance) against facilities determined to be out of compliance with the requirements of this subpart.
( c ) A State agency may use funds received under section 1525 of the Act to pay for expenses incurred in the course of carrying out this agreement.
( d ) Nothing in this subpart precludes any State from taking any action authorized by State law regarding the provision of services by any facility in the State as long as the action taken does not prevent the Secretary from enforcing the requirements of this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Guaranty Bank; Austin, TX; Notice of Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for Guaranty Bank, Austin, Texas (OTS No. 
08534), on August 21, 2009.

    Dated: August 25, 2009.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-20880 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
§ 405.405 General rules. ( a ) A physician or practitioner may enter into one or more private contracts with Medicare beneficiaries for the purpose of furnishing items or services that would otherwise be covered by Medicare, provided the conditions of this subpart are met.
( b ) A physician or practitioner who enters into at least one private contract with a Medicare beneficiary under the conditions of this subpart, and who submits one or more affidavits in accordance with this subpart, opts out of Medicare for the opt-out period described in § 405.400 unless the opt-out is terminated early according to § 405.445.
( c ) Both the private contracts described in paragraph (a) of this section and the physician's or practitioner's opt-out described in paragraph (b) of this section are null and void if the physician or practitioner fails to properly opt-out in accordance with the conditions of this subpart.
( d ) Both the private contracts described in paragraph (a) of this section and the physician's or practitioner's opt-out described in paragraph (b) of this section are null and void for the remainder of the opt-out period if the physician or practitioner fails to remain in compliance with the conditions of this subpart during the opt-out period.
( e ) Services furnished under private contracts meeting the requirements of this subpart are not covered services under Medicare, and no Medicare payment will be made for such services either directly or indirectly, except as permitted in accordance with § 405.435(c).
[63 FR 58901, Nov. 2, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 71370, Nov. 16, 2015]
#### § 801.203 Contingent equity interest.

The term *contingent equity interest* means a financial instrument that currently does not entitle its owner or holder to voting rights but is convertible into an equity interest with voting rights.
§ 526.405 Provision and receipt of services. ( a ) The prohibitions contained in § 526.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201.
( b ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 526.201 apply to services received in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, where the service is performed by, or at the direction of, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201.
( c ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201, or negotiate with or enter into contracts signed by a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201.
Note 1 to § 526.405 .
*See* §§ 526.507 and 526.509 for general licenses authorizing the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.
§ 137.429 What happens when a hearing is necessary? ( a ) The ALJ must hold a hearing within 90 days of the date of the order referring the appeal to the ALJ, unless the parties agree to have the hearing on a later date.
( b ) At least 30 days before the hearing, the Secretary must file and serve the Indian Tribe with a response to the notice of appeal.
( c ) If the hearing is held more than 50 miles from the Indian Tribe's office, the Secretary must arrange to pay transportation costs and per diem for incidental expenses to allow for adequate representation of the Indian Tribe.
( d ) The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 556.
HomeIndia

# India

		Environment		

438 items

        -    Report  		2019 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 7, 2019 
        -    Report  		India	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		India	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		India	  June 20, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		India (19-429) – Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports	  April 29, 2019 
        -    		India	  April 22, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		India (19-315) – Extension to Agreement of October 17, 2005 Concerning Science and Technology Cooperation	  March 15, 2019 
        -    Report  		India	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		U.S. Embassy New Delhi	  New Delhi, India 
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 

previous page1…3637383940…44next page

Back to Top
# C_2005187EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 July 2005

(2005/C 187/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2093 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6893 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4048 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5607 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,32 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,887 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,15 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0715 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5164 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,935 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6102 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5904 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4856 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3991 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7697 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,01 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 241,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0204 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8021 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,303 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 857,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5352 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,848 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,656 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,385 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2093

JPY

Japanese yen

135,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6893

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4048

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5607

ISK

Iceland króna

78,32

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,887

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

30,15

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0715

RON

Romanian leu

3,5164

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,935

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6102

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5904

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4856

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3991

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7697

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,01

KRW

South Korean won

1 241,89

ZAR

South African rand

8,0204

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8021

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,303

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 857,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5352

PHP

Philippine peso

67,848

RUB

Russian rouble

34,656

THB

Thai baht

50,385

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40198

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

JOSE LUIS JAIMES -BENITEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:15-CR-805-1 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis JaimesBenitez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes-Benitez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 25, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40198 Document: 00513966548 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2017
No. 16-40198

2 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40198 Document: 00513966548 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2017
----

Action brought on 13 July 2005 by Daniele Baraldi and Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-283/05)

(2005/C 229/70)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 July 2005 by Daniele Baraldi, resident in Alkmaar (Netherlands), Jacobus De Bruijn, resident in Ispra (Italy), and Christel Schilleger-Musset, resident in Brebbia (Italy), represented by Georges Vandersanden and Laure Levi, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicants are identical to those raised in Case T-58/05 Centeno Mediavilla and Others v Commission (1).

----

(1)OJ C 93 of 13.4.2005, p. 38.

----
Document

Exhibit 10(f)(f)(f)(f)





AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
HP INC.
2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The HP Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective as of November 17, 2020:
1.The second sentence of Section 3.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
“An Outside Director may elect to defer, in the manner prescribed by the Committee, up to a maximum of 100% of his Annual Retainer.”
In all other respects the Plan, as amended herein, is hereby ratified and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HP Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of this 3rd day of March, 2021.
    HP INC.
By:   /s/ TRACY KEOGH                               
Its: Chief Human Resources Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
use of our report dated April 17, 1998, on the financial
statements VICORP Restaurants, Inc. Employees' Profit
Sharing Plan, which is incorporated by reference in VICORP
Restaurants, Inc.'s Form 10-K/A amendment dated April 30, 1998,
to its Form 10-K report for the year ended October 31, 1997. 
It should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. subsequent to
October 31, 1997, or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
  April 17, 1998