alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet at September  30, 1996 and the Condensed
Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            7,232,995
<SECURITIES>                                      2,260,063
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,347,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                        178,000
<INVENTORY>                                       3,811,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19,312,590
<PP&E>                                           10,883,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,201,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29,137,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,992,752
<BONDS>                                             957,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    26
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            245,464
<OTHER-SE>                                       23,507,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29,137,720
<SALES>                                          28,159,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28,159,069
<CGS>                                            15,285,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23,879,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    167,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  167,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4,609,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,162,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,530,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,530,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.45
                                                  

</TABLE>
§ 23.5 What are the criteria for deciding which applications for assignment will be approved? ( a ) In approving or disapproving an application for assignment of Corps personnel, the Secretary will consider, among other pertinent factors: ( 1 ) The applicant's ability and plans to meet the operational requirements in § 23.8.
( 2 ) The administrative and managerial capability of the applicant.
( 3 ) The soundness of the applicant's financial plan for operating the National Health Service Corps site.
( 4 ) The extent to which community resources will be used in operating the National Health Service Corps site.
( 5 ) Comments received from any designated health systems agency or any designated State health planning and development agency to which an application was submitted for review under § 23.4(c).
( 6 ) Comments received from health professional societies serving the health manpower shortage area.
( b ) Special consideration for the assignment of Corps personnel will be given to the entity which is located in a health manpower shortage area over an entity which is not located in a health manpower shortage area but has a demonstrated interest in it.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3087

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an employee’s ‘‘regular rate’’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation

will not be affected by certain additional payments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1996

Mr. BALLENGER (for himself, Mr. GOODLING, and Mr. FAWELL) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and

Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide

that an employee’s ‘‘regular rate’’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation will not be affected by

certain additional payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 7(e)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

4 1938 (29 U.S.C. 207(e)(3)) is amended by inserting be5 fore the semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘; or (d) the

6 payments are made to reward an employee or group of

7 employees for meeting or exceeding the productivity, qual8 ity, efficiency, or sales goals as specified in a gainsharing,
2

•HR 3087 IH

1 incentive bonus, commission, or performance contingent

2 bonus plan’’.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Building Economic Inclusion via the Blue Economy Program

# 									Building Economic Inclusion via the Blue Economy Program							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 7, 2022

The U.S. Department of State and Taiwan, under the auspices of the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representation Office in the United States, are proud to partner with the Grameen Foundation to launch the Building Economic Inclusion via the Blue Economy (BELUU) program, a three-year effort to enhance women’s ability to thrive via a more connected business environment, demonstrating the benefits of inclusive development, women’s economic empowerment, and democratic values that foster participation from all. The program will focus on the power of the blue and green economies to increase the market participation of women entrepreneurs in the island nations of Palau, Nauru, Tuvalu, and the Republic of Marshall Islands.

BELUU will work with women-led civil society organizations to address barriers women islanders experience with respect to market engagement and disruptions in the economy.  In response to worsening climate impacts, including cyclones, drought, and sea-level rise, as well as the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on women and girls, BELUU will prioritize advancing equity through outreach to and consultation with individuals from rural areas, ethnic minority communities, and LGBTQI+ communities.

Under the auspices of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States (TECRO), BELUU is co-funded by the United States and Taiwan and is expected to reach more than 56,000 women and youth entrepreneurs and community members. The United States is committed to partnering with AIT and TECRO to enhance all women’s meaningful participation in the global economy.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBusinessMarshall IslandsNauruOffice of the SpokespersonPalauTaiwanTuvaluWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
#### J. T. MILLER v. Mary Katherine Miller HOWELL.

No. 52075.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 20, 1980.

Ransom P. Jones, III, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jackson County; Kenneth B. Robertson, Chancellor.

*1125W. Harvey Barton, Pascagoula, for appel-lee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED ON DIRECT AND CROSS-APPEALS.
40872.

#### ALLISON v. THE STATE.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of shooting at another, and assigns error on the overruling of his motion for new trial. *Held:*

1. The trial court’s instruction concerning the effect the jury may give to the defendant’s unsworn statement, which was substantially in the language of the statute giving the defendant the right to make an unsworn statement, was not error. *Code Ann.*§ 38-415; *Richmond v. State,*210 Ga. 403, 406 (80 SE2d 178).

2. The trial court, having instructed the jury that if they found the defendant guilty of the felony charged they had the right to recommend misdemeanor punishment, and thereupon the trial court in its discretion might punish the defendant as for a misdemeanor, was not required to charge the provisions of *267the statute prescribing the punishment for misdemeanors. *(Code Ann.*§ 27-2506). *Cade v. State,*41 Ga. App. 378 (153 SE 76).

Decided September 16, 1964.

*James E. Weldon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wright Lifford, Solicitor General, E. W. Fleming,*contra.

3. The verdict first returned by the jury was not finally accepted by the court, and the court repeated its instructions to the jury with respect to the verdicts which they could return under the indictment.

“The court may require an incomplete verdict, to be made complete, before receiving it.” *Kersey v. State, 207*Ga. 326 (1) (61 SE2d 493). The trial court did- not err in directing the juiy to retire and reconsider their verdict.

4. The evidence, though in conflict, was sufficient to support the verdict.

The trial court did not err in overruling the general and special grounds of the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
# C_2006009EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 January 2006

(2006/C 9/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2039 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3063 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5491 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 74,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5737 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,840 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,51 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8138 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6308 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,520 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6160 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6040 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3972 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3316 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7344 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9648 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 189,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3170 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7144 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 282,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,502 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,072 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,643 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2039

JPY

Japanese yen

138,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68140

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3063

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5491

ISK

Iceland króna

74,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5737

CZK

Czech koruna

28,840

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,51

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8138

RON

Romanian leu

3,6308

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,520

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6160

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6040

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3972

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3316

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7344

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9648

KRW

South Korean won

1 189,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,3170

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7144

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 282,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,502

PHP

Philippine peso

63,072

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3200

THB

Thai baht

47,643

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 407.22 Request for individual enrollment. ( a ) A request for enrollment is required of an individual who meets the eligibility requirements of § 407.10 and desires SMI, if the individual— ( 1 ) Is not entitled to hospital insurance;
( 2 ) Has previously declined enrollment in SMI;
( 3 ) Has had a previous period of SMI entitlement which terminated;
( 4 ) Resides in Puerto Rico or outside the United States; or
( 5 ) Is enrolling or reenrolling during a special enrollment period under § 407.20.
( b ) A request for enrollment under paragraph (a) of this section must: ( 1 ) Be signed by the individual or someone acting in his or her behalf; and
( 2 ) Be filed with SSA or CMS during the initial enrollment period, a general enrollment period, or a special enrollment period as provided in § 407.20.
# Niger

137 items

        -    Report  		Niger	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Niger	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Niger	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		U.S. Embassy Niamey	  Niamey, Niger 
        -    Report  		Niger	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Niger	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Niger	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Niger	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Niger (18-126) – Millennium Challenge Compact	  January 26, 2018 
        -    Report  		Niger	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1…11121314next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 2

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS:

     At the Company's annual  shareholder  meeting held August 29, 1997, Company
personnel advised the shareholders that they believed notice of meeting had been
inadequate  due to  inadvertent  failure to mail notice to beneficial  owners of
stock held in street  name,  although  there  appeared to be  sufficient  shares
present to  constitute  a quorum and ballots were  accepted at the meeting.  The
following  week the Company mailed a letter to  shareholders  advising them that
the meeting would be rescheduled.

     Following the mailing, a shareholder demanded through his attorney that the
Company  disclose  the results of the tallies of the August 29, 1997 ballots and
proxies under threat of litigation. The shareholder claimed that the meeting was
valid and that proper notice had been given.  After  reviewing  the matter,  the
Company has concluded  that the request for disclosure is reasonable and reports
the following tallies:

         Management's Nominees    Votes in Favor
         ---------------------------------------
         Larry E. Clark              2,138,168
         John R. Merendino           2,119,414
         David L. Dingman            2,119,414
         Richard Bruggeman           2,158,168

         "Write in" Names         Votes in Favor
         ---------------------------------------
          J. Lynn Smith               1,965,230
          Jim Pingree                 1,965,230

         Not Voting "For" Any Person
         ---------------------------------------
                                        390,300

         Ratification of Appointment of Auditors
         ---------------------------------------
         For                          2,086,983
         Against                            0
         Abstain                            0

     Based upon the foregoing, the Company concluded that the Board of Directors
was re-elected at the meeting and that the  appointment  of Arthur  Andersen LLP
was ratified.

                                        INMEDICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

                                        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS



                                       15
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jimmy Fred WILSON, Appellee.

No. 74-1303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 17, 1974.

*233Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and John Lipinski, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Joel Hirschhorn, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and GREEN, ROBERT A., Jr., Associate Judge.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

NATHAN, Judge.

The defendant was arrested on March 21, 1974. Subsequently he was discharged and the information against him was dismissed by order of the Circuit Court recorded August 13, 1974. The state filed its notice of appeal of the order of dismissal and discharge on September 12, 1974, but never requested an extension of the speedy trial period, and upon the expiration of 180 days, defendant moved the trial court for discharge pursuant to Rule 3.191(d)(3), RCrP. The motion was denied on the basis of lack of jurisdiction due to this pending appeal. The defendant now presents a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the state’s failure to bring the defendant to trial within 180 days renders the cause moot.

The issue, simply stated is whether pen-dency of an appeal by the state from an order of the trial court dismissing the information and/or discharging the defendant is to be deemed a “continuance” or “tolling of time” as a matter of law under the speedy trial rule where the state has not moved the trial court for an extension or continuance. The answer, based on the authority of Carroll v. State, Fla.1971, 251 So.2d 866, is clearly no, and we agree with this result.

The right to speedy trial as established in the sixth amendment is a fundamental right and should not be limited absent specific provision in the rules for the particular circumstance in question. Although the rules address themselves to extensions during interlocutory appeals,1 and the time limit for a new trial after declaration of a mistrial, or an order or notice for a new trial,2 there is no provision for the situation sub judice, to-wit: appeal by the state from a motion to dismiss. Therefore, it follows that in order for there to be an automatic extension of the time it must be specifically written into the rule to be operative.

The defendant is entitled to be discharged for the state’s failure to obtain an extension or continuance due to exceptional circumstances.

Therefore, the appeal is rendered moot, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the defendant is discharged.

It is so ordered.

1

. Rule 3.191(d) (2) (iv), RCrP.

2

. Rule 3.191(g), RCrP.
§ 802.302 Transactions that are not covered real estate transactions. Transactions that are not covered real estate transactions include: ( a ) A transaction that meets the definition of excepted real estate transaction in § 802.216.
( b ) A purchase or lease by, or concession to, a foreign person of covered real estate, or a subsequent change in rights, that does not afford or result in the foreign person having at least three of the property rights with respect to the covered real estate.
( c ) An acquisition of securities by a person acting as a securities underwriter, in the ordinary course of business and in the process of underwriting.
( d ) An acquisition pursuant to a condition in a contract of insurance relating to fidelity, surety, or casualty obligations if the contract was made by an insurer in the ordinary course of business.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


pursuant
to


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Robert
Y. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Hydromer, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Hydromer, Inc.








Date:
      September 23, 2008
            By:
      /s/ Robert Y.
      LeeRobert
      Y. LeeVice
      President, Chief Financial
Officer
#### Anthony J. CASORELLI v. Pete FOUNTAIN, Steven R. Plotkin and David Gertler, d/b/a Pete Fountain’s Buena Vista Hotel & Motel.

No. 51607.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 13, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1980.

Hopkins & Logan, Floyd J. Logan, Gulf-port, Jerry L. Hutcherson, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Hengen & Hengen, Wayne L. Hengen, Biloxi, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Walter M. O’Barr, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
§ 589.411 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked or who are subject to § 589.202, § 589.203, § 589.204, or § 589.205. ( a ) Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
( b ) Persons subject to § 589.202, § 589.203, § 589.204, or § 589.205 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are also subject to § 589.202, § 589.203, § 589.204, or § 589.205, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

Ms. Betsy Natz 

Executive Director 

Institute of Clean Air Companies (ICAC) 

3033 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700 

Arlington, Virginia 22201 

October 21, 2015 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

Re: Public comment letter submitted to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0341, Notice of 

Availability ofthe Environmental Protection Agency's Update ofTwo Chapters in the EPA Air 

Pollution Control Cost Manual, 80 FR 33515 (June 12, 2015) 

Dear Ms. N atz: 

Thank you for reviewing and providing comments on the Notice of Data Availability published as 80 FR 

33515 (June 12, 2015). Your comments from ICAC's letter dated September 10,2015 included two 

offers to provide additional information for revisions to the SNCR chapter upon EPA request. We would 

like to follow up with your offer and request the available information for the following: 

• Section 1.2.4, SNCR System: ICAC noted this section was out of date and could provide input 

for making revisions. We invite you to offer material suitable for a rewritten draft of the revised 

section, or a written statement of what the SNCR background section should include. 

• Figure 1.1 0, Approximate NSR Estimation for Urea: ICAC noted it could share more recent data 

related to the relationship between NSR and desired NOx reduction, particularly for inlet NOx 

concentrations below 0.5 lb/MMBtu. We are interested in receiving the data that is referred to 

in this comment. 

Thank you for your assistance. We appreciate your willingness to provide additional information and 

note that it would be of most use ifyou could share the additional information within 30 days of receipt 

of this letter. If you have any questions or additional comments, please contact me at (919) 541-5041, or 

by email at sorrels.larrv(i~epa gov. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wHh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer) 
Enclosure 

Sincerely, 

~~ Larry Sorrels 

Economist 

US EP A/OAQPS/HEID/ AEG 

cc: Regina Chappell, US EP A/OAQPS/HEID 

Darryl Weatherhead, US EPA/OAQPS/HEID/AEG
#### § 599.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.