alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005257EN.01001602.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/16

---

Action brought on 10 August 2005 — Microsoft/Commission

(Case T-313/05)

(2005/C 257/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties:

Applicant(s): Microsoft Corporation (Washington, USA) [represented by: J.-F. Bellis, lawyer, I. Forrester, QC]

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought:

| — | annul the Commission Decision of 1 June 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Decision of 1 June 2005;

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Following the Commission's Decision of 24 March 2004, contested in Case T-201/04 (1) and according to which the applicant is required to disclose specifications for certain Windows protocols in order to ensure interoperability with Windows, the Commission informed the applicant by letter of 1 June 2005 that, in its opinion, the applicant is under an obligation to permit distribution to third parties — non-licensees — in source code form of software developed by competitors on the basis of the disclosed Windows protocol specifications unless the software includes an invention by the applicant satisfying criteria of novelty and inventiveness.

1

The applicant contests the Commission's letter of 1 June 2005 as the applicant contends that the distribution in source code form of the software in question would grant non-licensees access to the applicant's trade secrets without giving the applicant the possibility to ensure that they are kept confidential through licensing terms as is the case for licensees.

The applicant is of the opinion that the letter of 1 June 2005 imposes an illegal deprivation of the applicant's property rights and that the Commission lacked competence to impose obligations going beyond those required by the Decision of 24 March 2004 as the Commission's letter of 1 June 2005 purports to apply this Decision.

The applicant further alleges that the letter of 1 June 2005 breaches the principle of proportionality as it goes beyond what is necessary to remedy the abuse established by the Decision of 24 March 2004.

Moreover the applicant claims that the test of novelty and inventiveness set out in the letter of 1 June 2005 breaches the principle of legal certainty as it is unclear, imprecise and very difficult to apply meaningfully in a trade secret context.

Finally, the applicant submits that the letter of 1 June 2005 contravenes principles of public international law binding on the Community because it entails a worldwide and thus extraterritorial disclosure of the applicant's property rights.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 of 10 July 2004, p. 18.

1

---
#### § 562.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures (including those pursuant to statements of licensing policy), and other procedures, *see* § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
#### § 137.405 Is the Secretary required to report to Congress on administration of Title V and the funding requirements presently funded or unfunded?

Yes, no later than January 1 of each year after the date of enactment of the Tribal Self-Governance Amendments of 2000, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives a written report regarding the administration of Title V. The report shall include a detailed analysis of the funding requirements presently funded or unfunded for each Indian Tribe or Tribal organization, either directly by the Secretary, under self-determination contracts under Title I, or under compacts and funding agreements authorized under Title V.
#### § 137.185 May a Self-Governance Tribe redesign or consolidate the PSFAs that are included in a funding agreement and reallocate or redirect funds for such PSFAs?

Yes, a Self-Governance Tribe may redesign or consolidate PSFAs included in a funding agreement and reallocate or redirect funds for such PSFAs in any manner which the Self-Governance Tribe deems to be in the best interest of the health and welfare of the Indian community being served, only if the redesign or consolidation does not have the effect of denying eligibility for services to population groups otherwise eligible to be served under applicable Federal law.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4271

_____________________________
D ONALD L. G REEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. September 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________2 Donald L. Green, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### § 137.15 Who may participate in Tribal Self-Governance?

Those Self-Governance Tribes described in 503(a) of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-2(a)] participating in the Title III Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project and up to 50 additional Indian Tribes per year that meet the criteria in § 137.18 may participate in self-governance.
# Bahrain

109 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 11, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Tim Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  August 23, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 17, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 17, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Bahrain Strategic Dialogue	  July 21, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahraini Foreign Minister Al-Zayani	  July 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bahraini Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid al-Zayani Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 20, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Bahrain 	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Bahrain	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bahrain	  May 15, 2023 

previous page12345…11next page

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01004002.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/40

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-468/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 229/83)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 29 June 2005, the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-468/04, Kenzo Takada v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 57 of 5.3.2005.

1

---
HomeJapan

# Japan

601 items

        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Japan	  January 21, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (20-101.2) – Trade Agreement	  January 1, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (20-101.1) – Digital Trade Agreement	  January 1, 2020 
        -    		Tokyo Statement on Quantum Cooperation	  December 19, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (19-830) – Protocol Amending the November 6, 2003 Convention on Double Taxation	  August 30, 2019 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Japan Record of Discussions of August 21, 2019	  August 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Japan	  July 11, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (19-625) – Agreement Amending the March 9, 2012 Agreement Regarding Cooperation in Nuclear Energy-Related Research and Development	   
        -    Report  		Japan	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Japan	  June 20, 2019 

previous page1…5152535455…61next page

Back to Top
Fiscal 2013 Executive Officer Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.51 
 Fiscal 2013 Executive Officer Bonus Plan 
 For the twelve month period
ending June 30, 2013, each executive officer of Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) is eligible to receive cash incentive compensation pursuant to the Fiscal 2013 Executive Officer Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”) as
follows: 
 Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA Goals 
 Receipt of cash incentive compensation for fiscal 2013 is based on the Company’s achievement of revenue and adjusted EBITDA financial goals for the first six months of fiscal 2013 as well as the full
fiscal year. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA with stock compensation added back into the calculation, in addition to an add-back of depreciation and amortization. Target bonus amounts are weighted 67% for the revenue goal and 33% for the
adjusted EBITDA goal. None of the executive officers is subject to individual goals under the Bonus Plan. Target bonus levels as a percentage of base salary are 100% for the President and Chief Executive Officer, 60% for the Chief Financial Officer
and 50% for the other executive officers. Depending upon the Company’s performance against the goals, participants are eligible to earn 75% to 150% of the adjusted EBITDA portion of their target bonus amount and 50% to 150% of the revenue
portion of their target bonus amount; however, in the event of extraordinary revenue or adjusted EBITDA performance above the goals set by the Board, the participants could receive incentive payments greater than 150% of their targets based on
extrapolation of the bonus-to-performance ratio set forth in the Bonus Plan, with no maximum payout set under the Bonus Plan. The Bonus Plan criteria are the same for all of the executive officers. 

Management by Objective Targets 
 The Bonus Plan also provides “management by objective” (MBO) targets related to certain predetermined FDA regulatory and sales productivity milestones for the first six months and last six
months of fiscal 2013. Achievement of the MBO targets could result in additional cash bonuses to executive officers for each target achieved of 3.75% of their annual base salaries for each of the periods. The Compensation Committee also has
authority to grant additional discretionary cash bonuses of up to 20% of annual base salary for any executive officer.
HomeUkraine

# Ukraine

1694 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Use of Presidential Drawdown Authority for Military Assistance for Ukraine	  April 24, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 23, 2024	   
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 22, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ukraine—Russia-occupied Areas	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Trip to the People’s Republic of China	  Matthew MillerApril 20, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior State Department Official Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to the People’s Republic of China	  April 20, 2024April 19, 2024Via Teleconference 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Solo Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 19, 2024Pollio Media Center TheatreCapri, Italy 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Italy 2024 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Steadfast Support for Ukraine	  April 19, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Driving Ukraine’s Economic Recovery in Partnership with the Private Sector	  April 18, 2024 

previous page12345…170next page

Back to Top
698 A.2d 569

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Terence Alan PLIZGA, Respondent.

No. 338, Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 2, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 16,1997, it is hereby

ORDERED that TERENCE ALAN PLIZGA be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one (1) year and one (1) day, to run concurrently with the one (1) year and one (1) day Suspension imposed by Order of this Court on December 4,1996, at No. 279 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

ZAPPALA, J., dissents and would impose a consecutive suspension.
§ 3.112 Submissions and forms. ( a ) Forms referred to in this subpart may be obtained on the PSO Web site (*http://www.pso.ahrq.gov*) maintained for the Secretary by AHRQ or a successor agency or on successor publication technology or by requesting them in writing by e-mail at *pso@ahrq.hhs.gov*, or by mail from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, CQuIPS, PSO Liaison, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850. A form (including any required attachments) must be submitted in accordance with the accompanying instructions.
( b ) Information submitted to AHRQ in writing, but not required to be on or attached to a form, and requests for information from AHRQ, may be submitted by mail or other delivery to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, CQuIPS, PSO Liaison, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, by facsimile at (301) 427-1341, or by e-mail at *pso@ahrq.hhs.gov .*
( c ) If a submission to the Secretary is incomplete or additional information is needed to allow a determination to be made under this subpart, the submitter will be notified if any additional information is required.
#### Edna JONES, Appellant, v. RAINMAKER LAWN SPRINKLER COMPANY, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Marvin Cohen, Individually, jointly and separtely, Appellees.

No. 74-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 10, 1975.

Rehearings Denied Feb. 7, 1975.

Horton & Perse and Welsh & Carroll, P. A., by Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Burdick & Donahoe by John E. Dona-hoe, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

DOWNEY, Judge.

The jury returned a special verdict in this personal injury action finding (1) that the defendant-appellees were guilty of 80% of the total negligence causing the accident involved, (2) that plaintiff-appellant was guilty of 20% of said total negligence, and (3) that the plaintiff-appellant’s total damages were $41,620. Thereafter the trial court reduced said damages by 20% and entered judgment for appellant in the amount of $33,296.

Appellant complains that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict in her favor on the question of negligence and in charging the jury on comparative negligence. She also asserts error in not being granted a new trial because of the inadequacy of the damages and in certain actions of the court .during trial. We have carefully considered all of said points on appeal, and we conclude that only one constitutes error.

We have combed the record to find some basis upon which the jury could ascribe negligence to the appellant and found none. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred in submitting the question of appellant’s negligence to the jury. Instead, the court should have granted appellant’s motion for a directed verdict, or perhaps more properly, withdrawn that issue from the jury.

The other issues involving appellees’ liability and appellant’s damages were fully and fairly presented to the jury and we find no reason to disturb their decision with respect to those issues.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed with directions to enter judgment on behalf of the appellant for $41,620.

WALDEN, J., and CONKLING, VIRGIL B., Associate Judge, concur.
§ 597.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked funds. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of funds (including any interest in funds) away from a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, such funds shall no longer be deemed to be funds in which the foreign terrorist organization or its agent has or has had an interest, or which are held in the name of a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, unless there exists in the funds another interest of a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if funds (including any interest in funds) are or at any time since the effective date have been held by a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, or at any time thereafter are transferred or attempted to be transferred to a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, including by the making of any contribution to or for the benefit of a foreign terrorist organization or its agent, such funds shall be deemed to be funds in which there exists an interest of the foreign terrorist organization or its agent.
# Palestinian Territories

503 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 15, 2021	  Ned PriceSeptember 15, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 10, 2021	  Jalina PorterSeptember 10, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 5, 2021	  Ned PriceAugust 5, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 30, 2021	  Jalina PorterJuly 30, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 27, 2021	  Jalina PorterJuly 27, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 16, 2021	  Jalina PorterJuly 16, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 12, 2021	  Ned PriceJuly 12, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Palestinian Authority	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 24, 2021	  Jalina PorterJune 24, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Death of Palestinian Activist Nizar Banat	  Ned PriceJune 24, 2021 

previous page1…4344454647…51next page

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANIEL KING

v.

HON. CHARLES B. BURR II, IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

DELAWARE COUNTY

PETITION OF: DANIEL KING AND

THOMAS P. GANNON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 173 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February , 201 7

, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED

.

The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch

Condominium Owners Association , is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See King

v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge , 2 MM 2017 (order dated February

28, 2017) ( issuing a rule on Petitioners “ to show cause why they should not be barred

from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving

Riverwatch Condominium Owners Assoc iation , including any related orders concerning

the awards of costs, as we ll as directives barring Thomas P. Gannon, Esquire, from

representing Daniel King. ”).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Devany, Dennis (OST) •hOT- OST- [(\^5 ' (c^'^ 

From: Christian Kosteleci<y [cliristian.l<ostelecky@saxnnotor.com] A'lori/^nT ^ ^ 

Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 9:33 AM .''"ii?rOHTATlON 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) . i'i:t O.PERATfONS 

Cc: dicl<insonairport@ndsupernet.com 

Subject: Great Lakes EAS Bid ^^un n--r ^ , . ,^ 

••••^^ ^'u 2b A 10: m 

Dear Mr. Dennis DeVany 

I am very encouraged by the new EAS bid from Great Lakes Airlines for commercial air service to and from Dickinson 

Theodore Roosevelt Regional Airport in Dickinson, ND. We own two automobile dealerships in southwest North Dakota, 

and utilize the Dickinson airport for many business trips on an annual basis for our employees to attend training classes 

out of state. 

Great Lakes has been a good partner in our effort to provide reliable service at a reasonable cost to our business. We 

appreciate that we are able to connect to many locations and need only drive 5-10 minutes to the airport for this 

service. It has been harder to book some flights with the additional energy activity in the region, and therefore 

additional flights would be a huge benefit for us and other businesses in the area. 

A concern of ours is always reliability of service since most of the time we are scheduled for certain meetings or training 

sessions. By increasing the amount of roundtrip flights out of Denver, I feel service will only continue to improve. 

Please accept our support of commercial air service in Dickinson and specifically Great Lakes Airlines in their continuing 

effort to provide quality service to southwest North Dakota. 

Christian Kostelecky 

General Manager 

Sax IVIotor Co. 

312 West Villard 

Dickinson, ND 58601 

701.483.4411 main 

800.489.9430 toll 

701.483.4293 fax 

701.290.0043 mobile 

christian.kosteleckv@saxmotor.com 

Visit us Online @ saxmotor.com 

This is a transmission fmm Sax Motor Co., and may contain information that is priviieged and confidential. Sax Motor Co. assumes no 

responsibility for damages resulting from unauthorized access, disclosure or tampering, which could have occurred during transmission. If you 

have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify Sax Motor Co. immediately at 701.483.4411.