alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,906
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,856
<PP&E>                                          98,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,132
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,282
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,824
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,711
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.05)
        



</TABLE>
§ 555.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 555.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 555.407 :
*See also* § 555.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
#### § 137.173 Does a Self-Governance Tribe have a right of appeal from a disallowance?

Yes, the notice must set forth the right of appeal and hearing to the Interior Board of Contract Appeals, pursuant to section 110 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 450m-1].
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSI, Robert R. Jones, III, President and CEO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual reportis being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):             (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: March 30, 2006     /s/ Robert R. Jones, III   Robert R. Jones, III  President and CEO
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Euro exchange rates **

*
Official Journal C 334 , 30/12/2005 P. 0028 - 0028 *

Euro exchange rates [1]

29 December 2005

(2005/C 334/02)

| Currency | Exchange rate |

USD | US dollar | 1,1825 |

JPY | Japanese yen | 139,43 |

DKK | Danish krone | 7,4587 |

GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68830 |

SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4104 |

CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5585 |

ISK | Iceland króna | 75,34 |

NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0165 |

BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |

CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |

CZK | Czech koruna | 29,010 |

EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |

HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,51 |

LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |

LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |

MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |

PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8602 |

RON | Romanian leu | 3,6915 |

SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |

SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,870 |

TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5963 |

AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6197 |

CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3796 |

HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1681 |

NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7348 |

SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9685 |

KRW | South Korean won | 1194,92 |

ZAR | South African rand | 7,4997 |

CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5438 |

HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3750 |

IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11629,89 |

MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,470 |

PHP | Philippine peso | 62,690 |

RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0560 |

THB | Thai baht | 48,431 |

[1] Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

--------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.100 To whom payment is made. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section— ( 1 ) Medicare pays hospital insurance benefits only to a participating provider.
( 2 ) For home health services (including medical supplies described in section 1861(m)(5) of the Act, but excluding durable medical equipment to the extent provided for in such section) furnished to an individual who at the time the item or service is furnished is under a plan of care of an HHA, payment is made to the HHA (without regard to whether the item or service is furnished by the HHA directly, under arrangement with the HHA, or under any other contracting or consulting arrangement).
( b ) *Exceptions.* Medicare may pay hospital insurance benefits as follows: ( 1 ) For emergency services furnished by a nonparticipating hospital, to the hospital or to the beneficiary, under the conditions prescribed in subpart G of part 424 of this chapter.
( 2 ) For services furnished by a Canadian or Mexican hospital, to the hospital or to the beneficiary, under the conditions prescribed in subpart H of part 424 of this chapter.
[53 FR 6633, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 65 FR 41211, July 3, 2000]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2725

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to require Federal contracts debarment for persons who violate the Act’s provisions, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 6, 1995

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Economic and Educational Opportunities, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to require

Federal contracts debarment for persons who violate the

Act’s provisions, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Contractor

5 Safety and Health Enforcement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEBARMENT.

7 The Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C.

8 651 et seq.) is amended—
2

•HR 2725 IH

1 (1) by redesignating sections 33 and 34, as sec2 tions 34 and 35, respectively;

3 (2) by inserting after section 32 the following

4 new section:

5 ‘‘FEDERAL CONTRACTS DEBARMENT

6 ‘‘SEC. 33. (a) Any person or entity that, with a clear

7 pattern and practice, violates the provisions of this Act

8 shall be ineligible for all Federal contracts for a period

9 of 3 years.

10 ‘‘(b) The Secretary shall promulgate regulations re11 garding debarment provisions and procedures. The regula12 tions shall require that Federal contracting agencies shall

13 refrain from entering into further contracts, or extensions

14 or modifications of existing contracts, with any person or

15 entity described in subsection (a) during the 3-year period

16 immediately following a determination by the Secretary

17 that the person or entity is in violation (as described in

18 subsection (a)) of this Act.

19 ‘‘(c) A debarment may be removed, or the period of

20 debarment may be reduced, by the Secretary upon the

21 submission of an application to the Secretary that is sup22 ported by documentary evidence and that sets forth appro23 priate reasons for the granting of the debarment removal

24 or reduction, including reasons such as compliance with

25 the final orders that are found to have been willfully vio-
3

•HR 2725 IH

1 lated, a bona fide change of ownership or management,

2 or a fraud or misrepresentation of the charging party.’’.

Æ
In the Senate of the United States,

September 28, 1996.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2700) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate the building

located at 8302 FM 327, Elmendorf, Texas, which houses operations of the United States Postal Service, as the ‘Amos F.

Longoria Post Office Building’ ’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Page 2, after line 9 insert:

1 SEC. 2. INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

2 Paragraph (3) of section 3626(b) of title 39, United

3 States Code, is amended by striking the period and insert4 ing ‘‘, and includes a nonprofit organization that coordi5 nates a network of college-level courses that is sponsored pri6 marily by nonprofit educational institutions for an older

7 adult constituency.’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2700

AMENDMENT
# C_2005330EN.01001103.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/11

---

Removal from the register of Case C-389/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 330/23)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

By order of 5 October 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-389/04: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 6.11.2004.

1

---
#### John Cesanek *v.*G. Fox & Co., Inc.

Maltbie, C. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued December 2

decided December 28, 1942.

*Julius B. Schatz,*with whom were *Arthur D. Weinstein*and, on the brief, *Edward Seltzer,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Warren Maxwell,*for the appellee (defendant).

Fee Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries he suffered when a bicycle on which he was riding came into collision with an automobile owned by the defendant and operated by one of its employees within the scope of his employment. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff has appealed. The finding states the following facts: The plaintiff was fifteen and one-half years of age. Having completed an errand in a store on the west side of Laurel Street in Hartford, he mounted his bicycle and rode southerly along the street in a course three or four feet easterly of its west curb. He turned his head and looked back over his shoulder. Two cars were approaching, also going in a southerly direc*493tion. Both were approximately riding the rails of the more westerly of two trolley tracks along the street, the defendant’s car being the second and about thirty-five feet in the rear of the first. The defendant’s car was proceeding at a speed of about twenty miles an hour. The first car passed the plaintiff. As the defendant’s car was passing him at a distance of five or six feet, the plaintiff turned his bicycle sharply to the left and collided with its right rear fender. The defendant driver gave no signal of his approach.

The plaintiff seeks several corrections in the finding. He claims particularly that the injuries suffered by him in his fall to the street, all on his left side, indisputably establish that the collision could not have occurred in the way the trial court has found but can only be explained upon the theory advanced by him, that the side of the defendant’s car struck him and his bicycle as it passed. There are too many uncertainties involved in the way in which the plaintiff might fall if the collision occurred as the trial court found to make this claim tenable. No material change can be made in the finding.

The trial court could reasonably conclude that the defendant was not negligent. The case of *Johnson*v. *Shattuck,*125 Conn. 60, 3 Atl. (2d) 229, relied on by the plaintiff, is not authority to the contrary. Not only do the facts involved in that case materially differ from the one before us but we were not called upon ourselves to determine whether or not the defendant was negligent any more than we are in this. The question for our determination was whether the trial court could reasonably have reached the conclusion that it did, and we held only that it could properly find such negligence. So in this case, we are only called upon to determine whether the trial court could reasonably find that the defendant was not negligent. *494It is not necessary to consider the trial court’s other conclusion, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

There is no error.
#### In re ESTATE of Louise B. RINCON, Deceased.

No. 73-1150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
H. R. 2982

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Carbon Hill National Fish

Hatchery to the State of Alabama.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carbon Hill National Fish Hatchery Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CARBON HILL NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY

TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA.

(a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days after the

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

shall convey to the State of Alabama without reimbursement, all

right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property

described in subsection (b), for use by the Game and Fish Division

of the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources,

as part of the State of Alabama fish culture program.

(b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Carbon Hill National

Fish Hatchery, located on County Road 63 at Carbon Hill, Alabama,

in Walker County, Alabama, consisting of 67 acres (more or less),

and all improvements and related personal property under the

control of the Secretary that is located on that property, including

buildings, structures, equipment, and all easements, leases, and

water rights relating to that property.

(c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The property conveyed

to the State of Alabama pursuant to this section shall be used

by the State for purposes of fishery resources management and

fisheries-related activities, and if it is used for any other purpose

detrimental to those purposes and activities, all right, title, and

interest in and to all property conveyed pursuant to this section

shall revert to the United States. The State of Alabama shall
H. R. 2982—2

ensure that the property reverting to the United States is in

substantially the same or better condition as at the time of transfer.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Joseph C. Christenson, certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of PPT VISION, Inc.




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.






Date:
        January 25, 2008/s/ Joseph C. ChristensonJoseph C. Christenson,President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








---
#### § 802.225 Lead agency.

The term *lead agency* means the Department of the Treasury and any other agency designated by the Chairperson of the Committee to have primary responsibility, on behalf of the Committee, for the specific activity for which the Chairperson designates it as a lead agency, including all or a portion of an assessment, a review, an investigation, or the negotiation or monitoring of a mitigation agreement or condition.
§ 403.201 State regulation of insurance policies. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart do not affect the right of a State to regulate policies marketed in that State.
( b ) Approval of a policy under the voluntary certification program, as provided for in § 403.235(b), does not authorize the insuring organization to market a policy that does not conform to applicable State laws and regulations.