alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 547.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 547.201(a); or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 547.201(a), also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 547.201(a).
**Exhibit 10.37**
   **Notice of Grant of Award** **LSI LOGIC CORPORATION** ID: 94-2712976 1621 BARBER LANE MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035
   **OPTIONEE NAME** **Award Number: RS000011****Address** **Plan: 2003****Address** ** **

Effective _________, you have beengranted an award of ____________shares of LSI LOGIC CORPORATIONcommon stock. These shares are restricted until the vest date(s) shown below.
The current total value of the award is $____________.
The number of shares indicated are scheduled to become fully vested on the date shown below. However,vesting will occur only if you have not incurred a Termination of Service prior to such date, as described in theattached LSI LOGIC CORPORATION Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (the “Agreement”). Capitalized termsthat are not defined in this Notice of Grant of Award or the Agreement have the same meaning as in the LSILOGIC CORPORATION referenced equity incentive plan.     **Shares** **Full Vest**                                         

By your signature below, you agree that this award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditionsof the Agreement (and the equity incentive plan referenced therein), which is attached and made a part of thisdocument. You acknowledge that you have received, read and understand this Notice of Grant of Award, theAgreement and the LSI LOGIC CORPORATION referenced equity incentive plan, and that you have had anopportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to signing below. You agree to accept as binding, conclusiveand final all decisions or interpretations of the Administrator regarding any questions relating to the LSI LOGICCORPORATION referenced equity incentive plan, this Notice of Grant of Award and the Agreement.

    OPTIONEE NAME Date
HomeBrazil

# Brazil

224 items

        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Brasilia, Brazil: American School of Brasilia: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Escola Americana do Rio de Janeiro: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		Exporting Pro-Kremlin Disinformation: The Case of Nova Resistência in Brazil	  October 19, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Brazil National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 7, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Brazil	  August 21, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Brazil, Peru	  August 11, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		2023 Secretary’s Award for Global Anti-Racism Champions 	  August 8, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Raquel Krähenbühl of GloboNews	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to Brazil	  July 19, 2023 

previous page1…45678…23next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           122,864
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,575
<MORTGAGE>                                         318
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 131,430
<CASH>                                             278
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,155
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          14,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,741
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 97,987
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 95,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,935
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,741
<PREMIUMS>                                     135,717
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             12,011
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,142
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  16,191
<BENEFITS>                                      99,419
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      4,411
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            33,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,805)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.43)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### EDWARD L. NEZELEK, INC., Appellant, v. G. E. DRYWALL, INC., and Larry Leatherwood, Appellees.

No. 80-1211.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1981.

Richard L. Polin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Sheldon Golding of Golding & Wagen-heim, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

At the conclusion of a construction project appellee, G. E. Drywall, Inc., sued appellant, Edward L. Nezelek, Inc., the general contractor, to recover for extras which appellee had furnished as a subcontractor. From a judgment for $47,197.29, plus attorney’s fees of $10,000, and costs of $332.47, in favor of Drywall, Nezelek has perfected this appeal.

Four points have been posed by Nezelek for our consideration. We find merit, however, in only one point, concerning the allowance of attorney’s fees. The fee allowed was not determined by the jury which tried the case but by the court after the jury verdict had been rendered. Nezelek contends there was no contract entitling Drywall to attorney’s fees and, in any event, the amount of attorney’s fees was a jury question. We agree with both of those contentions.

The contract between Nezelek and Drywall, in pertinent part, provided:

> “Any damage, cost, loss or expense, including counsel fees, suffered or incurred by the contractor [NEZELEK] by reason of or in consequence of the subcontractor’s failure to perform this contract shall be fully chargeable and shall be paid by the subcontractor.”

Obviously, this provision cannot be said to allow Drywall to recover fees in this case. At oral argument counsel for Drywall argued that it was only fair to have the contractual provision work both ways. While conceding the essential fairness of the argument, we must deal with the contract which the parties fashioned for themselves.

Although the allowance of attorney’s fees in a case of this nature would ordinarily require a jury determination, along with the claimant’s other damages (absent a stipulation otherwise), we need not treat that issue since Drywall cannot recover attorney’s fees in this case in any event.

*1221Accordingly, the provision in the judgment allowing Drywall attorney’s fees is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the attorney’s fees. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, and remanded with directions.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
#### Nellie J. O’Neill, Respondent, *v.*Bernard Trainor, Appellant.

Appeal from "a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict. _ • • ■ ¡

W. B. Donihee, for appellant.

Charles A. Wendell, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This action is brought to recover the sum of $675 for breach of contract of employment.

The complaint alleges that the defendant employed the plaintiff for the period commencing on February 24; 1896, and ending January 1, 1897, at $25 per week, and that on Juné 20, she was discharged without cause and suffered damage as stated.

The answer, contains a general denial, and further alleges that plaintiff was hired for no .stated time. j

The testimony shows that the plaintiff1 upon the trial proved every material allegation of her- complaint.

The defendant’s evidence is to the effect that plaintiff was not employed for any stated period, and,, therefore, he had a right to discharge her at any time. ■

That she was incompetent and careless in the performance of her duties.

The jury having found for the plaintiff, it is quite evident that they believed plaintiff’s version of the transaction in question and disbelieved the defendant,, which, of course, they had á perfect' right to do, and now defendant asks us to set aside the verdict upon the ground that it is against the weight of evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record presented to us,, and find that the jury was fully justified in finding for the plaintiff.

We also find that - there was no error committed in the admission or exclusion of evidence or in the judge’s charge.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J„ Ooulau and Schuchmab,' JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Ex10.1.2012.2Q.10Q




Exhibit 10.1
PVH CORP.


SCHEDULE OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS’ FEES


EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 2012


BOARD


	
			
	Annual member fee
	$70,000
	Retainer

	Meeting fee
	$0
	 

	Equity Award – Restricted  Stock Units
	$135,000 value
	This award is targeted to equal the number of restricted stock units with a value of approximately $135,000 as of the date of grant.

	Presiding Director Fee
	$30,000
	Retainer






AUDIT COMMITTEE


	
			
	Fee to chair
	$35,000
	Retainer

	Fee to member
	$20,000
	Retainer






COMPENSATION COMMITTEE


	
			
	Fee to chair
	$30,000
	Retainer

	Fee to member
	$15,000
	Retainer






NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE


	
			
	Fee to chair
	$20,000
	Retainer

	Fee to member
	$10,000
	Retainer






CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE


	
			
	Fee to chair
	$20,000
	Retainer

	Fee to member
	$10,000
	Retainer








Please note:      There is no per-meeting fee as of June 21, 2012.  Annual retainers will be paid quarterly.


All meeting-related expenses will be reimbursed to non-employee Directors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                      14,253,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,655,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                   151,389
<INVENTORY>                                  9,197,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,718,363
<PP&E>                                      38,992,606
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,488,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,826,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,584,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       484,729
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,826,498
<SALES>                                     42,013,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,196,587
<CGS>                                       33,123,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,932,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,566,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,154,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,138,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,138,168
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
#### § 596.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise specified, reference to any section of this part or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, direction, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
# Honduras

129 items

        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Honduras	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Honduras and Costa Rica	  March 16, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 16, 2022	  Ned PriceFebruary 16, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 8, 2022	  Jalina PorterFebruary 8, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Actions Against Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez for Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 7, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 24, 2022	  Ned PriceJanuary 24, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya’s Travel to Honduras on December 12-13	  December 10, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The Election in Honduras	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 30, 2021 

previous page1…45678…13next page

Back to Top
§ 800.508 Completion or termination of investigation and report to the President. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the Committee shall complete an investigation no later than the forty-fifth day after the date the investigation commences, or, if the forty-fifth day is not a business day, no later than the next business day after the forty-fifth day.
( b ) Upon completion or termination of any investigation, the Committee shall send a report to the President requesting the President's decision if: ( 1 ) The Committee recommends that the President suspend or prohibit the transaction;
( 2 ) The Committee is unable to reach a decision on whether to recommend that the President suspend or prohibit the transaction; or
( 3 ) The Committee requests that the President make a determination with regard to the transaction.
( c ) In circumstances when the Committee sends a report to the President requesting the President's decision with respect to a covered transaction, such report shall include information relevant to sections 721(d)(4)(A) and (B), and shall present the Committee's recommendation. If the Committee is unable to reach a decision to present a single recommendation to the President, the Chairperson of the Committee shall submit a report of the Committee to the President setting forth the differing views and presenting the issues for decision.
( d ) Upon completion or termination of an investigation, if the Committee determines to conclude all deliberative action under section 721 with regard to a notified covered transaction without sending a report to the President, action under section 721 shall be concluded. An official at the Department of the Treasury shall promptly advise the parties to such a transaction in writing of a determination to conclude action.
( e ) In extraordinary circumstances, the Chairperson may, upon a written request signed by the head of a lead agency, extend an investigation for one 15-day period. A request to extend an investigation must describe, with particularity, the extraordinary circumstances that warrant the Chairperson extending the investigation. The authority of the head of a lead agency to request the extension of an investigation may not be delegated to any person other than the deputy head (or equivalent thereof) of the lead agency. If the Chairperson extends an investigation under this paragraph with respect to a covered transaction, the Committee shall promptly notify the parties to the transaction of the extension.
( f ) For purposes of paragraph (e) of this section, the term *extraordinary circumstances* means circumstances for which extending an investigation is necessary and the appropriate course of action, in the Chairperson's discretion, due to a force majeure event or to protect the national security of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (189)
<INVENTORY>                                        174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,241
<PP&E>                                           7,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,099)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,792
<SALES>                                         13,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,853
<CGS>                                            8,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,497
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,001
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of InMedica  Development  Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of
the  Company on Form 10QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005 fully  complies
with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the  information  contained  in such  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition of the Company at the end of such
periods and the results of operations of the Company for such periods.


/s/ Ralph Henson
Ralph Henson,
 Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005


/s/ Richard Bruggeman
Richard Bruggeman,
 Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
#### James Edward VASS, Appellant, v. Gladys Lovell Small VASS, Appellee.

No. 78-2276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1980.

Paul W. Potter, Jr., Riviera Beach, and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, West Palm Beach, and Jack E. Ackerman of Johnson, Ackerman & Bakst, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. The burden of proof to support a finding of a special equity was on appellant. *Tanner v. Tanner,*194 So.2d 702 (Fla.2d DCA 1967). The sufficiency of appellant’s showing in that regard depended upon the facts. It is well settled that the findings of the trier of fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are not to be disturbed on appeal. *First National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett,*82 So.2d 870 (Fla.1955). Taken in the light most favorable to appel-lee, as required by *Williams v. Williams,*177 So.2d 865 (Fla.3rd DCA 1965) we determine that the trial court’s findings do not constitute that abuse of discretion required by *Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (1980) to warrant reversal.

WE THEREFORE AFFIRM.

MOORE, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.