alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Franklin Lumber Company, complainant, *v.*Harold Anderson, Incorporated, et al., defendants.

[Argued May 23d, 1929

Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*543
      *Mr. Robert M. Boyd, Jr.,*for the appellants Montclair Trust Company and the Essex Title Guarantee and Trust Company.

*Messrs. Koehler & Augenblich,*for the respondent receiver of Harold Anderson, Incorporated.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, J.

In this case, there is an appeal from an order or decree of the court of chancery, dated November 13th, 1928, in which it is ordered that the receiver be allowed for his services the sum of $4,000; the counsel for the receiver be allowed for their services the sum of $3,000; the special master be allowed for his services, in stating and auditing the receiver’s final account, the sum of $500. The appeal is made from that part of the order or decree that allows such sums for the services rendered, on the ground that they are excessive and above the value of the services rendered and grossly disproportionate to the amount of money handled and the labor involved. Our reading of the testimony leads us to that conclusion. ¥e think an allowance of $1,500 to the receiver, an allowance of $1,000 to .the counsel and an allowance of $100 to the special master is ample compensation for such services, as the testimony shows, were rendered in this case.

It would serve no useful purpose to review the facts at length; suffice it to say, that the testimony brought up in the printed book shows the receiver’s final report and account. It contains schedules A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J *544and K. Schedule A, receipts, consists of four (4) items, total $33,500. Schedule B, disbursements, total $136.19. Schedule I, list of claims allowed as general claims, total $26,926.66. Schedule J, general disbursements, $51.04. Schedule K, sales expenses, $19.15. The fund was derived from the foreclosure of two real estate mortgages and the sale of the Davega apartment $1,500, total $33,500. From this it is quite clear that these allowances are excessive, as advised by the learned vice-chancellor. The compensation allowed should be measured by the reasonable value of the services. What is reasonable compensation may and often does vary, depending upon a variety of circumstances in each case. It should bear some fair proportion to the services actually rendered, which is not the case in the order or decree under review. Many circumstances doubtless must be considered, such as the labor and time involved, the nature of the litigation, the responsibility imposed, the amount involved and the like.

This subject is fully discussed in *6 Corp. Jur. 748, 752*§ *331c; 2 R. C. L. 1031*§ *114.*

The decree of the court of chancery will be remitted to that court directing the decree to be modified and to enter a decree in accordance with this opinion.

*For modification*— -The Chief-Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Uetfield, Dear, J'J. 13.
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofJune 1, 2017 by and among CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P. asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wilmington Trust asTrustee and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian relating to the CFCRE 2017-C8Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 **(CFCRE2017-C8)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.     Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of June 8, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and ifthere has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any materialrespect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein. 

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                                Date: March 1, 2018

     Adam Singer,Managing Director
# C_2005166EN.01001802.xml

| 7.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3826 — Trimoteur/Nibcapital/Fortis/Sandd)

(2005/C 166/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3826. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3826. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Joseph N. HARTDEGEN et al. v. Russell P. JUNEAU, et al.

No. 55140.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1974.

In re: Russell P. Juneau, St. Romain Oil Company, Inc. and Pan American Fire and Casualty Company, applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 296 So.2d 334.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error in their judgment.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

 41

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6672

JAMES NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PHYLLISS HOPKINS, Deputy Warden of Operations,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-7611

JAMES NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PHYLLISS HOPKINS, Deputy Warden of Operations,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-2217-2-18-AJ)

Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: February 13, 1996
2

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

No. 95-6672 dismissed and No. 95-7611 affirmed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

James Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY &

KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

motion to amend his complaint. We dismiss as interlocutory Appellant's first appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to

amend his complaint. (No. 95-6672). In Appellant's second appeal

(No. 95-7611), we have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Nelson v. Hopkins, No. CA-94-2217-2-18-AJ (D.S.C.

Mar. 28, 1995; Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

No. 95-6672 - DISMISSED

No. 95-7611 - AFFIRMED
HomeQatar

# Qatar

215 items

        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Israel, Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt 	  Matthew MillerOctober 12, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 10, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 10, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Israel, Jordan , Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt, October 11-18, 2023	   
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Doha, Qatar: American School of Doha: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Qatar (23-929) – Temporary Relocation Transit Agreement	  September 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Media Note  		Meeting of U.S. Officials with Taliban Representatives	  July 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative for Afghanistan West and Special Envoy for Afghan Women, Girls, and Human Rights Amiri’s Travel to Kazakhstan and Qatar	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Qatari Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al Thani	  June 26, 2023 

previous page1…45678…22next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996


                                                                  PERCENTAGE
                                                                  OF VOTING
                                              JURISDICTION        SECURITIES
NAME                                         OF ORGANIZATION        OWNED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRUST Bank, National Association            National Bank          100%

Will Rogers Bank                              Oklahoma               100%

NestEgg Consulting Inc.                       Kansas                 100%

INTRUST Community Development Corporation     Kansas                 100%


Note:  As of  September  16,  1996,  The First Bank,  Moore,  Oklahoma no longer
operates as a separate subsidiary of the Company, having merged into Will Rogers
Bank. As of December 18, 1996,  First Moore  Insurance  Agency,  Inc. was merged
into the Company and no longer operates as a separate subsidiary.
Exhibit 35.15  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate
Adminstrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  /s/ Leslie HaytonLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
HomeGreece

# Greece

165 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs Lewis Travels to Türkiye and Greece	  April 4, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Greece Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks to the East Macedonia and Thrace Forum	  Geoffrey R. PyattMarch 13, 2024Virtual 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis	  March 6, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Thessaloniki, Greece: Pinewood – The American International School of Thessaloniki: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Athens, Greece: American Community Schools of Athens: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Greek Foreign Minister Gerapetritis	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Greece Strategic Dialogue	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Artemis Accords Signing Ceremony With Greek Foreign Minister Georgios Gerapetritis, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, and Dr. Daglis	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 9, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Greece’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  February 9, 2024 

123…17next page

Back to Top
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128034 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 128034 COA: 250580 Muskegon CC: 02-047915-FC SANDY SEAN HOLT, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCL 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs with in 42 days of the date of this order addressing wheth er there was a violation of the 180-day rule, MCL 780.131, in this case in light of People v Williams, 475 Mich 245 (2006), and whether the time
limitation set forth in MCL 780.1 31 is subject to waiver or ex tension for any reason, such as prosecutor good faith, mutu al agreement of the parties, or time attributable to the defendant, including requests for adjournment.

The Criminal Defense A ttorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invite d to file briefs amicus curi ae. Other persons or groups
interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

t0919 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2006

Clerk
#### Charles P. CORDER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51294.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 18, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15, 1979.

Leon E. Provine, Grenada, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
HomeIndonesia

# Indonesia

201 items

        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (09-1211) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Program of the Peace Corps in Indonesia	  December 11, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (09-701.1) – Agreement Regarding a Debt-for-Nature Swap with Respect to Certain Debts Owed	  July 1, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (09-216) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Establishment of the American-Indonesian Exchange Foundation (AMINEF)	  February 16, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (08-1001) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  October 1, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (07-918) – Memorandum of Understanding on Marine and Fisheries Science, Technology and Applications Cooperation	  September 18, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (06-1120) – Memorandum of Understanding on General Cooperation in Science and Technology for Natural Hazard Assessment, Analysis, Warning, Preparedness and Mitigation	  November 20, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (06-1117.1) – Memorandum of Understanding on Combating Illegal Logging and Associated Trade	  November 17, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (06-1117) – Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Their Customs Administrations	  November 17, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (04-1014) – Agreement Amending and Extending the Agreement of June 30, 1980, as Amended and Extended, Concerning Peaceful Uses in Nuclear Energy	  October 14, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (96-1223) – Protocol Amending the Convention of July 11, 1988 for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 23, 1996 

previous page1…18192021next page

Back to Top
#### § 582.311 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
# C_2005193EN.01000601.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 June 2005

in Joined Cases C-462/03 and C-463/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt Strabag AG, Kostmann GmbH v Österreichische Bundesbahnen (1)

1

(Public procurement contracts - Directive 93/38/EEC - Water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors - Concepts of ‘operation’ and ‘provision’ of networks providing a service to the public in the field of transport by railway - Railway infrastructure works)

(2005/C 193/08)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases C-462/03 and C-463/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria), made by decision of 27 October 2003, received at the Court on 4 November 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Strabag AG (C-462/03), Kostmann GmbH (C-463/03) and Österreichische Bundesbahnen — the Court (Second Chamber) composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Where a contracting entity exercising one of the activities particularly mentioned in Article 2(2) of Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors contemplates, in the exercise of that activity, the award of a supply, works or service contract or the organisation of a design contest, that contract or contest is governed by the provisions of this directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       716
<INVENTORY>                                       5104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13788
<PP&E>                                            3223
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   20647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        420
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                        1204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     20647
<SALES>                                           6721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7279
<CGS>                                             4047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>