alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

##### U.S. Geological SurveyScientific Investigations Map 3045Version 1.0

# Three-Dimensional Geologic Map of the Hayward Fault Zone, San Francisco Bay Region, California

### By G.A. Phelps, R.W. Graymer, R.C. Jachens, D.A. Ponce, R.W. Simpson, and C.M. Wentworth

#### 2008

A three-dimensional (3D) geologic map of the Hayward Fault zone was created by integrating the results from geologic mapping, potential field geophysics, and seismology investigations.  The map volume is 100 km long, 20 km wide, and extends to a depth of 12 km below sea level.  The map volume is oriented northwest and is approximately bisected by the Hayward Fault.  The complex geologic structure of the region makes it difficult to trace many geologic units into the subsurface. Therefore, the map units are generalized from 1:24,000-scale geologic maps.  Descriptions of geologic units and structures are offered, along with a discussion of the methods used to map them and incorporate them into the 3D geologic map.  The map spatial database and associated viewing software are provided.  Elements of the map, such as individual fault surfaces, are also provided in a non-proprietary format so that the user can access the map via open-source software.  The sheet accompanying this manuscript shows views taken from the 3D geologic map for the user to access.  The 3D geologic map is designed as a multi-purpose resource for further geologic investigations and process modeling.

----

Download the map for this report as a 44" x 36" PDF file (sim3045_map.pdf; 3.1 MB).

Download the pamphlet for this report as a 34-page PDF file (sim3045_text.pdf; 824 kB).

Download the map as open-source VTP files for use with Paraview (sim3045_vtp.zip; 17 MB compressed file that opens into a 44.8-MB folder).

Download the map for use with the EarthVision™ 3D viewer (map.zip; 35.3 MB compressed file that opens into a 72.6-MB folder).

For questions about the content of this report, contact Geoff Phelps

Suggested citation and version history

----

Download a free copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Scientific Investigations Maps || Geology Research and Information | Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP) |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/3045/index.html*            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact           	Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 17:12:04 EST
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2913 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2913

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that amounts 
collected with respect to the provision of health care at a Department 
  of Veterans Affairs medical center may be retained by that medical 
                                center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1996

  Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Clinger, Mr. Watts of 
 Oklahoma, and Mr. Taylor of North Carolina) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that amounts 
collected with respect to the provision of health care at a Department 
  of Veterans Affairs medical center may be retained by that medical 
                                center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETENTION BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTERS 
              OF MEDICAL CARE COST RECOVERY AMOUNTS.

    (a) Authority for Retention.--Section 1729(g)(2) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2) Amounts recovered or collected under this section with 
respect to the cost of the furnishing of care or services under this 
chapter at a facility of the Department shall be credited to amounts 
currently available for the furnishing of care and services under this 
chapter at that facility.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to amounts recovered or collected under section 1729 
of title 38, United States Code, after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Namibia

55 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Namibia	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Namibia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Namibian Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 21, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Namibia	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Namibia	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Public Designation of Former Namibian Public Officials for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  June 15, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Namibia	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Namibia	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Namibian Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 21, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Namibia	  December 2, 2020 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1941

PATRICK CHRISTIAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH STATE OF VIRGINIA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00536-HEH)

Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Christian appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Christian v. 

Virginia, No. 3:17-cv-00536-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs...Contact Us – Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

# 									Contact Us – Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs							

For speaking requests and interview requests on Western Hemisphere Affairs, please send your request to WHAPress@state.gov.

For visa information, contact 202-663-1225. For travel information for U.S. citizens, contact 202-647-5225.

For all other issues, contact the State Department’s Public Communications Division at 202-647-6575.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

Back to Top
HomeIndonesia

# Indonesia

201 items

        -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Narrowing the Gender Digital Divide: Empowering Girls Around the Globe to Build Digital Skills for a Lifetime 	  April 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: 	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Thailand	  March 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Readout of Virtual Ministerial Meeting of the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate	  March 14, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink’s Travel to Indonesia and Malaysia	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 2, 2023Rashtrapati Bhavan Cultural CenterNew Delhi, India 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Indonesia	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Indonesian Foreign Minister Marsudi	  February 16, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Marking One Year Since the Release of the Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy	  February 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Co-Chairs’ Statement on the Third ASEAN-U.S. Cyber Policy Dialogue	  February 3, 2023 

previous page1…45678…21next page

Back to Top
#### Charles C. Buck, Appellant, *against*The Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent.

(Decided December 3d, 1888.)

Plaintiff, a passenger on defendant’s elevated railroad, while attempting to get off the platform of a car at his station, was forced between the car platform and the station platform by others boarding the train, and was injured. In an action therefor, it did not appear that any precaution was taken by the guard upon such platform to prevent incoming passengers from interfering with plaintiff in his effort to leave the train. *Held,*that the question of negligence in such particular should have been submitted to the jury, and a dismissal of the complaint was error.

*49Appeal from a judgment of this court entered upon the dismissal of a complaint at the trial.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*John W. Weed*and *Richard M.*Henry, for appellant.

*Howard Townsend*and *Henry B. Sedgwick*Jr., for respondent.

Larremore, Ch. J.

The plaintiff was nonsuited upon the trial and the case for review presents a close question as to the defendant’s liability. ' Plaintiff was a passenger on the elevated railroad in Third Avenue, and when the train reached the station at 67th Street, he walked from his seat to the platform of the car, and while there some persons in their attempt to board the train caused him to fall between the car platform and the station platform. One of his legs was broken, and for this injury he brought suit.

It does not appear that any precaution was taken by the guard upon the train to prevent the incoming passengers from interfering with the plaintiff in his effort to leave the train.

' The duty of the defendant as a common carrier, toward its passengers, required the exercise of proper care and precaution for their safety *(Mavelick*v. *Eighth Avenue R. Co.,*36 N.Y. 378).

It seems to me that'if any necessary precaution was omitted on the part of the defendant to protect its passengers in their exit or egress, that question should have been left to the jury. This proposition seems to have been fully sustained in *Byrne*v. *New York Central, &c., R. Co.*(104 N.Y. 362).

I think the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Van Hoesen, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.
No. 98-9537.

#### Sims *v.*Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted.
#### Jennie E. Kent, Respondent, *against*Richard C. Sibley *et al.,*Appellants.

(Decided June 3d, 1889.)

An undertaking, given in another state, on appeal from a judgment in summary proceedings in favor of a landlord, provided that the tenant “shall answer for all rents that may accrue during the pendency of the writ of error, or which may be due at its final disposal.” *Held,*that fraud in inducing the tenant to enter into the lease was not a defense to an action on the undertaking.

Appeal from a judgment of the General. Term, of the City Court of New York affirming a judgment of that court sustaining a demurrer to a defense set up in defendants’ answer.

The facts- are stated in the opinion.

*Le Barbier & Brewster,*for appellants.

*Pelton & Poucher,*for respondent.

Bookstaver, J.

The action is on an undertaking on appeal from a judgment in summary proceedings in favor of a landlord, rendered in a justice’s court in Connecticut. The judgment was affirmed, Hence this action' on the under*299taking, which provides that Sibley (the tenant), “ shall answer for all rents that may accrue during the pendency of the writ of error, or which may be due at its final disposal.”

As a second defense to the action, defendant Sibley set up fraud in inducing him to enter into the lease. This would be a good defense to an action for rent on the lease, or ground for an action to set aside the lease, but is no defense to this action on the undertaking, by which the defendants bound themselves to pay all rents accruing during the appeal. The only questions which can be litigated in such an action are the validity of the instrument sued on, and the amount due by the terms of the lease.

The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Larremore, Ch. J., and Allen, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed,- with costs.
A` 4#jujm

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MITCHELL PAUL COOK

NO. 2023 KW 0836

OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: Mitchell Paul Cook, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

Nos. 1880- M- 2021, 1879- F- 2021. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED for the sole purpose of transferring the writ

application, which includes the pleading, to the district court

for enforcement of its June 7, 2023 order in which it granted

relator' s " Motion for Transcripts," if it has not done so

already. 

JEW

GH

EW
#### Rosemary T. HOUSE, Appellant, v. Hugh A. HOUSE, Appellee.

Nos. 80-2471, 80-2472.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 2, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1981.

Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Jack J. Taffer, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court had the discretion to order that fees and costs to-talling $18,504.59 awarded to the wife’s attorney be paid over a period of approximately thirty (30) months, *Harder v. Harder,*331 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA), *cert. den.,*342 So.2d 1101 (Fla.1976), and that no abuse of that discretion is shown on the record before us.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42272-42279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BILLING

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-40]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-40 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 42273]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.041


[[Page 42274]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.042


[[Page 42275]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.043


[[Page 42276]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.044


[[Page 42277]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.045


[[Page 42278]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.046


[[Page 42279]]


[FR Doc. E9-20011 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
HomeBelize

# Belize

71 items

        -    		Relief and Development Coherence	   
        -    Report  		Belize	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Belize (18-1016) – Air Transport Agreement	  October 16, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belize	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belize	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belize	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belize	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Belize (18-223.1) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Categories of Archaeological Material	  February 23, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belize	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Belize	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top
- Office Home
- About Us
- Members
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Counterterrorism...The Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

# The Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

## 				Our Mission			

					On September 10, 2014, the U.S. announced the formation of a broad international coalition to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).				

Back to Top
698 A.2d 589

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Antuan BRONSHTEIN, Petitioner.

No. 0088 Capital Appeal Docket.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 28, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 1997, upon consideration of petitioner’s emergency motion for a stay of execution pending the filing and resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari, and the Commonwealth’s concurrence with this *521application, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s application is GRANTED and his execution will be stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court on his petition for writ of certiorari from this Court’s ruling in *Commonwealth v. Bronshtein,*547 Pa. 460, 691 A.2d 907 (1997).
HomeMozambique

# Mozambique

94 items

        -    TIAS  		Mozambique (00-307.1) – Defense Agreement concerning U.S. Military and Civilian Personnel in Connection with the Current Humanitarian Relief Operations and Other Activities	  March 7, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Mozambique (13063) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  September 23, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Mozambique (12972) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  July 14, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Mozambique (91-1227) – Agreement concerning the Program of the Peace Corps	  December 27, 1991 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
# Exhibit 3.6

CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT

OF THE

SECOND AMENDED AND
RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

ASCENT ASSURANCE,
INC.

---

Under Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law

---

Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(the DGCL), the undersigned corporation (the Corporation) does
hereby certify:

FIRST:
That Article First of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation (the Certificate of Incorporation) has been amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is USHEALTH Group, Inc.; and

SECOND:
That the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified was duly adopted
in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by Patrick H.
ONeill, its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, this
3rd day of March, 2005.

| | ASCENT
ASSURANCE, INC.                                                                                                            
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | By:/s/ Patrick H. O'Neill          Name:
Patrick H. ONeillTitle:
Executive Vice President,          General Counsel and Secretary
- Media Hub Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of International Media Engagement...Brussels Media Hub

# Brussels Media Hub

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Brussels  Media Hub is part of the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs and works to connect U.S. policy makers and experts with European media. The Hub also uses video technology to communicate information on U.S. foreign policy to Europeans through social and broadcast media. As part of the U.S. Department of State’s Office of International Media Engagement, the Hub works closely with the Public Affairs offices of U.S. Embassies throughout Europe.				

Russian Language Spokesperson

Dan Cisek

#### 				@USAenFrancais Twitter										

 

#### 				@USApoRusski Twitter										

 

#### 				French								

 

#### 				Russian								

 

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01002902.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/29

---

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Johan Maes against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-265/05)

(2005/C 229/62)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Johan Maes, resident in Sterrebeek-Zaventem (Belgium), represented Lucas Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 3 December 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March 2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of 3 December 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the decision fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September 2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay EUR 25 000 by way of damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further specifications;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Fernandez Tunon

Commission

---