alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

NO. 03-14-00605-CR

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

HOWARD THOMAS DOUGLAS § APPELLANT

VS. §

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLEE

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. D1-DC-12-900059

STATE'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

The State of Texas respectfully moves for an extension of the deadline for

filing the State’s brief and, in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

38.6 and 10.5(b), advises the Court as follows:

(a) Following his conviction for Securing Execution of a Document by

Deception, the appellant filed his notice of appeal in the above cause on September

17, 2014. Appellant filed a brief on April 24, 2015.

(b) The State’s brief is currently due on May 26, 2015.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00605-CR

5413138

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/26/2015 11:09:33 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/26/2015 11:09:33 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

(c) This request is that the deadline for filing the State’s brief be extended

by 30 days.

(d) The number of previous extensions of time granted for submission of

the State’s brief is: none.

(e) The State relies upon the following facts to reasonably explain the

need for an extension of the deadline:

1. During the period since this brief was filed, the attorney assigned

to this case has been working on other pressing appellate matters

and has not had sufficient time to prepare an adequate response to

this brief.

2. This request is not made for the purpose of delay, but to ensure

that the Court has a proper State’s brief to aid in the just

disposition of the above cause.
3

WHEREFORE, the State of Texas respectfully requests that the deadline for

filing the State’s brief be extended to June 25, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEMARY LEHMBERG

District Attorney

Travis County, Texas

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No. 06022700

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

(512) 854-9400

Fax No. 854-4810

Lisa.Stewart@traviscountytx.gov

AppellateTCDA@traviscountytx.gov
4

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i), I hereby certify, based

upon the computer program used to generate this motion, that this motion contains

231 words, excluding words contained in those parts of the motion that Rule 9.4(i)

exempts from inclusion in the word count. I certify, further, that this motion is

printed in a conventional, 14-point typeface.

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on the 26th day of May, 2015, a true and correct copy of

this motion was served, by U.S. mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or electronically

through the electronic filing manager, to the Appellant’s attorney, Craig M. Price,

Hammerle Finley Law Firm, 2871 Lake Vista Drive, Suite 150, Lewisville, Texas

75067, [cmp@hammerle.com].

/s/ Lisa Stewart

Lisa Stewart

Assistant District Attorney
# Euroopan unionin C 44A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-1053
  doi:10.3000/19771053.CA2012.044.fin |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 44A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 55. vuosikerta16. helmikuu 2012 |

ISSN 1977-1053

doi:10.3000/19771053.CA2012.044.fin

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 44A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

55. vuosikerta16. helmikuu 2012

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2012/C 044A/01 | Oikaistaan kilpailuilmoitukset COM/AD/01/10 ja COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ja COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ja COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ja COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ja COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ja COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ja COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ja COM/AD/16/10 (EUVL C 265 A, 30.9.2010) | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2012/C 044A/01

Oikaistaan kilpailuilmoitukset COM/AD/01/10 ja COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ja COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ja COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ja COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ja COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ja COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ja COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ja COM/AD/16/10 (EUVL C 265 A, 30.9.2010)

(EUVL C 265 A, 30.9.2010)

1

Luettelo EUVL:n C A -sarjassa julkaistuista kilpailuista

Jäljempänä luettelo kuluvana vuonna julkaistuista C A -lehdistä.

Mikäli toisin ei mainita, EUVL on julkaistu kaikkina kieliversioina.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 16.2.2012 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2012

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 44/1

---

Oikaistaan kilpailuilmoitukset COM/AD/01/10 ja COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ja COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ja COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ja COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ja COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ja COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ja COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ja COM/AD/16/10

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 265 A, 30. syyskuuta 2010
  )

(2012/C 44 A/01)

Kilpailuilmoitusten jaksossa VI (sivut 6, 19, 28, 36, 49, 58, 70, 82)

korvataan:

”VI   VARALLAOLOLUETTELOT

| 1. | Kirjaaminen varallaololuetteloon |
| --- | --- |

1.

[...]

Varallaololuettelot ovat voimassa 31. joulukuuta 2012 saakka.”

seuraavasti:

”VI   VARALLAOLOLUETTELOT

| 1. | Kirjaaminen varallaololuetteloon |
| --- | --- |

1.

[...]

Varallaololuettelot ovat voimassa 31. joulukuuta 2014 saakka.”

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40198 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
JOSE LUIS JAIMES -BENITEZ,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:1 5-CR- 805 -1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis JaimesBenitez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes -Benitez ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 25, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40198 Document: 00513966548 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2017No. 16- 40198

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40198 Document: 00513966548 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2017
No. 99-8662.

#### Worthington *v.*Missouri.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
# Sri Lanka

102 items

        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (16-1228) – Agreement Regarding Termination of 1951 and 1991 Radio Transmitting Station Agreements	  December 28, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (04-0712) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, with Amending Protocol	  July 12, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (03-808) – Agreement for Finance Investment Incentive	  August 8, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (03-704) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  July 4, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (02-1118) – Air Transport Agreement	  November 18, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (13066) – Treaty on Extradition	  January 12, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (12981) – Agreement Amending the Agreement of August 29, 1964, for Financing Certain Education Exchange Programs	  August 13, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (98-804) – Defense Assistance Agreement	  August 4, 1998 

previous page1…891011next page

Back to Top
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1317 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 193

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
*same as existing AD open access 19.0 $1,615.0 0 $1,615.0 0 $ 0.00 *add cap seal fasterners (left and right Wing Tanks) 4.0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 0 $ 0.00 *close access 7.0 $ 595.00 $ 595.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of complianc e for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Ana**lysis** (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode o f transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to the United Nations

# 									Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to the United Nations							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 7, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Conflict and Stabilization Operations Anne A. Witkowsky will travel to New York December 8-9 for meetings with counterparts at the United Nations.  Their discussions will focus on opportunities for engagement through the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability, a core component of which is working with multilateral partners on the ground in priority geographic areas.  Their discussions will also focus on opportunities for engagement on the thematic issues of atrocity prevention and women, peace, and security.

Please contact CSOPublicAffairs1@state.gov for media inquiries and follow @StateCSO on Twitter for updates.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsNew YorkOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelPeaceSecurityUnited NationsWomen's Issues

Back to Top
# Cuba

160 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 12, 2021	  Ned PriceJuly 12, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Cuba	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary’s Message to the Cuban People	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 20, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Cuba	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 20, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 20, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute Release of Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volumes X, XI, XII, American Republics; Cuba 1961–1962; Cuban Missile Crisis and Aftermath, Microfiche Supplement	  March 31, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Cuba	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 11, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 11, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 11, 2021 

previous page1…1011121314…16next page

Back to Top
Order issued January 14,2014

In The 

## Court of Appeal* For the 

## jf it&t Biatrttf of %txm

NO. 01-14-00030-CV 

### SGOTT MAGZEN, Appellant V. JAMES J. WOODCOCK, C & J INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFINED BENEFIT 

### TRUST, AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellee On Appealfrom 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-69580

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

### This case isrelated to the following case previously filed inthe Court ofAppeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas: , No. 14-14-00019-CV. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 1.5, this case is transferred to the Fourteenth Court. The Clerk of this Court shall send to the Clerk of the Fourteenth Court: (1) the clerk's record and reporter's record, if any; (2) all documentsfiled in this case; and (3) certified copies of all orders,judgments,and opinions from this Court, ifany. The clerk shall keep the original ofall orders, judgments, and opinions ofthis court.

Is/ ChiefJustice Sherry Radack 

### ChiefJustice Sherry Radack Acting Individually
#### § 594.512 Payment of taxes and incidental fees to the Palestinian Authority.

Effective April 12, 2006, U.S. persons are authorized to pay taxes or fees to, and purchase or receive permits or public utility services from, the Palestinian Authority where such transactions are necessary and ordinarily incident to such persons' day-to-day operations. Nothing in this license authorizes a debit to an account of the Palestinian Authority on the books of a U.S. financial institution or to any account blocked pursuant to this part.

[71 FR 27200, May 10, 2006]
# China

## Post navigation

China
§ 1003.1210 Amount of penalties. The OIG may impose a penalty of not more than— ( a ) $100,000 for each individual violation of § 1003.1200(a) or § 1003.1200(b)(2); and
( b ) $10,000 for each day that such information has not been provided in violation of § 1003.1200(b)(1).
[81 FR 88362, Dec. 7, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 42841, July 3, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3009 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3009

 To amend the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 with respect to the 
                   subpoena power of the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1996

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 with respect to the 
                   subpoena power of the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Commission Amendments 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION SUBPOENA POWER.

    Section 3(e)(2) of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 
U.S.C. 1975a(e)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The Commission is not authorized to issue any subpoena except for an 
investigation, within the authority of the Commission under subsection 
(a)--
                    ``(A) of a specific incident of the deprivation of 
                the right to vote; or
                    ``(B) in any other case, if the subpoena is 
                directed to an officer or employee of the Federal, 
                State, or a local government.''
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 1 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01041 - CV No. 05 - 15 - 01042 - CV No. 05 - 15 - 01043 - CV No. 05 - 15 - 01044 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .W., ET AL, CHILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . DF - 10 - 13224 - U , DF - 13 - 18933 - U, DF - 14 - 01075 7 - U, and DF - 13 - 18931 - U 

### O RDER W e GRANT Father’s November 12, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file brief and Mother’s November 13, 2015 motion for addit ional time to file brief and ORDER Father’s brief tendered to the Clerk on November 16, 2015 and Mother’s brief tendered to the Clerk on November 13, 2015 filed as of the date of this order

. Appellee’s brief is due December 9 , 2015.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, 

INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) 

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants

______________________ 

2016-2691, 2017-1875

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:09-cv-05235-

MMC, Judge Maxine M. Chesney.

______________________ 

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

______________________ 

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, 

MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, 

HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 
2 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. v. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

O R D E R

 Appellee Power Integrations, Inc. filed a petition for 

rehearing. A response to the petition was invited by the 

court and filed by appellants Fairchild Semiconductor 

International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, 

and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation. The petition was 

first referred to the panel that heard the appeal. The 

panel granted the petition in part and denied it in part 

(see accompanying order). Thereafter, the petition was 

referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active 

service.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(2) The mandate of this court will issue on October 29, 

2018.

 

 FOR THE COURT

 September 20, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
# Greece

169 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 11, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis	  July 7, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerJune 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Richard Verma Travels to Qatar, Germany, the Netherlands, and Greece	  June 23, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Greece	  June 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		World Ocean Day 2023:  Celebrating Our Victories, Planning for Our Future 	  Maxine  BurkettJune 8, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerMay 23, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 22, 2023	  Matthew MillerMay 22, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Greece	  May 15, 2023 

previous page123456…17next page

Back to Top
HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of the Legal Adviser...Office of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

# Office of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

## 				Our Mission			

					Provide legal advice and services to client bureaus and principal officers of the Department of State on matters of particular importance to United States foreign policy interests in the area of public diplomacy and public affairs				

## 							Immunity from Judicial Seizure Program						

        -  											Immunity from Judicial Seizure Statute (22 U.S.C. 2459)										 
        -  											Executive Order No. 12047										 
        -  											Application Procedure and Checklist										 
        -  											Sample Language										 

### 											Immunity from Judicial Seizure Statute (22 U.S.C. 2459)											

Immunity from seizure under judicial process of cultural objects imported for temporary storage, conservation, scientific research, exhibition, or display
													Statutory Text													Immunity from Judicial Seizure Statute (22 U.S.C. 2459)

### 											Executive Order No. 12047											

Executive Order 12047, March 27, 1978, 43 F.R. 13359, as amended by Executive Order 12388, October 14, 1982, 47 F.R. 46245.
													More Information													Executive Order No. 12047

### 											Application Procedure and Checklist											

Application Procedure and Checklist
													More Information													Application Procedure and Checklist

### 											Sample Language											

Sample language for immunity
													More Information													Sample Language

Back to Top