alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Ann Miller, as Administratrix, Etc., of Andrew J. Miller, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, Otsego County,

May, 1898.)

A joint liability cannot be set off against an individual one — Waiver.

The mere admission, without objection, upon a judicial settlement, of a joint note of two persons sought to be set off by the aidministratrix against the liability of her intestate to one of them, does not establish the counterclaim -and it remains the duty of the court to decide the question according to the established law that such a set-off is not permissible.

Motion for reargument in the- above-entitled proceedings as to the claim of Emma Crounse-.

James W. Barnum, for motion.

Charles T. Brewer, opposed.

Arnold, S.

In the matter of the claim of Emma Crounse against Andrew J. Miller, deceased, I decided that the joint note of Emma Crounse and her -husband, held by the administratrix of Miller’s estate, could not be allowed as a counterclaim.

A motion is now made for a reargument. Counsel for the administratrix points to the fact that the note was received in evidence without objection, and he insists that, therefore, any objection which might have existed to its being considered as a counterclaim was waived; that the objection being waived, the note *512establishes the liability of Emma Oroimse for its faca value,, with interest, and that that amount should be allowed as a counterclaim.

Upon the submission of the case, it was the duty of the court to consider the effect of the evidence. H the evidence offered by the claimant failed to establish.a cause of action against the administratrix, her claim had to be dismissed, whether such evidence was objected' to :or not; on the other hand, if the evidence of the claimant, established a cause of action, the administratrix, to establish a counterclaim, had to prove a cause of action against claimant.

Does the evidence establish a cause of action against the claimant, individually?

■ ' The evidence establishes the joint liability of Emma Crounse and Levi Orounse; therefore, a joint judgment could only be rendered upon it. St. Michael’s Church v. Behrens, 10 Civ. Pro. 181-189.

The Code of Civil Procedure does not allow such a cause of action as a counterclaim, to an individual liability. ' § 501. '

The evidence does not establish a cause of action against claimantj individually. Spofford v. Rowan, 124 N. Y. 108, at p. 113.

I have carefully examined the points submitted by the learned counsel for the administratrix, and the cases that he has. cited. I cannot see that those cases conflict in any way with the cases cited above, or with the views herein expressed. The other matters referred to in the moving papers had been allowed before this motion was made.

The motion is denied, with $10 costs.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20147]



[[Page 42356]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6735]


Certification Related to Aerial Eradication in Colombia Under the 
Andean Counterdrug Programs Section of the Department of State Foreign 
Operations and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8)

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State and 
delegated to me, including under the Andean Counterdrug Programs 
section of the Department of State Foreign Operations and Related 
Programs Appropriations Act, 2009, (Division H, Pub. L. 111-8), I 
hereby determine and certify that: (1) The herbicide used for aerial 
eradication of illicit crops in Colombia is being used in accordance 
with EPA label requirements for comparable use in the United States and 
in accordance with Colombian laws; (2) the herbicide, in the manner it 
is being used, does not pose unreasonable risks or adverse effects to 
humans or the environment including endemic species; and (3) complaints 
of harm to health or licit crops caused by such aerial eradication are 
thoroughly evaluated and fair compensation is being paid in a timely 
manner for meritorious claims.
    This certification shall be published in the Federal Register, and 
copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.

    Dated: August 7, 2009.
William J. Burns,
Under Secretary for Political Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-20147 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-P
HomeChelsea M.H. Bakken

# 									Chelsea M.H. Bakken							

## **Chelsea M.H. Bakken**

#### **Managing Director for Operations**

Ms. Bakken joined Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) in September 2022 as the Managing Director for Operations. Previously she served as the Management Counselor in Tunis and as the Senior Management Officer for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) in Kabul. Her recent domestic tours were in EAP/EX as a Post Management Officer (for China), and in the Operations Center as a Senior Watch Officer. Her earlier overseas experience includes nearly ten years in the AF region working mostly in management positions in Kampala, Bujumbura, Brazzaville, and Kinshasa. Ms. Bakken attended U.C. Berkeley for her undergraduate degree and later received a master’s degree in Public Policy from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. She speaks French. Ms. Bakken’s Foreign Service adventure is shared with her tandem husband and their two sons.

Back to Top
# C_2005205EN.01000501.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 30 June 2005

in Case C-286/04 P: Eurocermex SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Three-dimensional shape of a long-neck bottle in the neck of which a slice of lemon has been plugged - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character)

(2005/C 205/09)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-286/04 P, appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 29 June 2004, Eurocermex SA, established in Evere (Belgium), represented by A. Bertrand, lawyer, appellant, the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. Rassat, acting as Agent, defendant at first instance — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 June 2005, in which it:

Eurocermex SA,

30 June 2005,

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Eurocermex SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eurocermex SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217 of 28.08.2004

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Counselor Chollet and Under Secretary Fernandez Meet with Bulgarian Energy Delegation

# 									Counselor Chollet and Under Secretary Fernandez Meet with Bulgarian Energy Delegation							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 15, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Counselor of the Department Derek Chollet and Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose Fernandez hosted a high-level delegation from Bulgaria yesterday for discussions focused on energy diversification and the clean energy transition.  Bulgarian Deputy Prime Minister for EU Funds and Minister of Finance Assen Vassilev and Minister of Energy Alexander Nikolov led the delegation, which met with a broad range of energy experts from across the U.S. Government to discuss Bulgaria’s efforts to meet climate commitments and diversify energy sources and supplies.  After Washington, the trade mission is visiting Pittsburgh, Dallas, and Houston to discuss renewables, battery storage, nuclear fuel and technology, and LNG procurement with private sector counterparts.  This visit underscores the deep and growing partnership between the United States and Bulgaria to address global challenges and strengthen shared security and economic opportunity.

Tags

BulgariaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
# C_2005193EN.01003701.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/37

---

Action brought on 30 May 2005 by the Italian Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-212/05)

(2005/C 193/62)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 May 2005 by the Italian Republic, represented by Antonio Cingolo, Avvocato dello Stato.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the following memoranda [No 02772 of 21 March 2005 [POR Campania Region Ob 1 2000-2006 (No. CCI 1999 IT 16 1 PO 007)], No. 04534 of 13 May 2005 [Docup Ob 2 Lombardy Region 2000-2006 (No. CCI 2000 IT 16 2 DO 014)] and No 04537 of 13 May 2005 [Docup Ob 2 Lombardy Region 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 16 2 DO 014)]] and all related and prior measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the following memoranda [No 02772 of 21 March 2005 [POR Campania Region Ob 1 2000-2006 (No. CCI 1999 IT 16 1 PO 007)], No. 04534 of 13 May 2005 [Docup Ob 2 Lombardy Region 2000-2006 (No. CCI 2000 IT 16 2 DO 014)] and No 04537 of 13 May 2005 [Docup Ob 2 Lombardy Region 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 16 2 DO 014)]] and all related and prior measures;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-345/04 between the Italian Republic and the Commission (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004, p. 55.

1

---
# Panama

159 items

        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Panama	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Colombia, Panama, and Brazil	  March 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to Panama and Honduras	  March 16, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		United States Announces $800 Million in International Commitments for Protecting Our Ocean	  March 8, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Tab 1. Deputy Assistant Secretary Burkett’s Opening Remarks for the CMAR Action Plan Public Panel	  Maxine  BurkettMarch 3, 2023CMAR Action Plan Public Panel 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Secretary John Kerry, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, and Monica Medina, Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs	  John KerryMarch 3, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S Delegation Announced $6 billion USD in Commitments to Address Threats to Our Ocean, Doubling Last Year’s Pledge	  March 3, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Delegation Announced 6 Billion USD in Commitments to Address Threats to Our Ocean, Doubling Last Year’s Pledge at Eighth Our Ocean Conference	  March 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Supporting Green Shipping and Coastal Ecosystems in the Americas	  March 1, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Panama	  February 27, 2023 

previous page123456…16next page

Back to Top
§ 1008.36 Submission of a request. ( a ) A request for a formal advisory opinion must be submitted in writing. An original and 2 copies of the request should be addressed to the headquarter offices of the OIG.
( b ) Each request for an advisory opinion must include— ( 1 ) To the extent known to the requestor, the identities, including the names and addresses, of the requestor and of all other actual and potential parties to the arrangement, that are the subject of the request for an advisory opinion;
( 2 ) The name, title, address, and daytime telephone number of a contact person who will be available to discuss the request for an advisory opinion with the OIG on behalf of the requestor;
( 3 ) A declaration of the subject category or categories as described in § 1008.5 of this part for which the advisory opinion is requested. To the extent an individual or entity requests an advisory opinion in accordance with § 1008.5(a)(3) or (a)(5) of this part, the requesting individual or entity should identify the specific subsections of sections 1128, 1128A or 1128B of the Act or the specific provision of § 1001.952 of this chapter about which an advisory opinion is sought:
( 4 ) A complete and specific description of all relevant information bearing on the arrangement for which an advisory opinion is requested and on the circumstances of the conduct,[1] including— ( i ) Background information,
( ii ) For existing arrangements, complete copies of all operative documents,
( iii ) For proposed arrangements, complete copies of all operative documents, if possible, and otherwise descriptions of proposed terms, drafts, or models of documents sufficient to permit the OIG to render an informed opinion,
( iv ) Detailed statements of all collateral or oral understandings, if any, and
( v ) If applicable, a designation of trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information in the manner described in 45 CFR 5.41;
( 5 ) Signed certifications by the requestor(s), as described in § 1008.37 of this part;
( 6 ) A declaration regarding whether an advisory opinion in accordance with part 411 of this title has been or will be requested from CMS about the arrangement that is the subject of the advisory opinion request; and
( 7 ) Each requesting party's Taxpayer Identification Number.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0990-0213) [62 FR 7357, Feb. 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 38325, July 16, 1998; 73 FR 15939, Mar. 26, 2008; 85 FR 72910, Nov. 16, 2020] Footnotes -
1008.36
[1] The requestor is under an affirmative obligation to make full and true disclosure with respect to the facts regarding the advisory opinion being requested.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,708-01
EX P ARTE RAYMON BOUDR EAUX, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 742110-A IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . K

E E L , J., not participating.

O R D E R Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to fifty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Eig hth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Boudreaux v. State , No. 08-97-00326- CR (Tex. App.

— El Paso November

19, 1998) (not desig nated f or publication). Applica

nt filed this application for
a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On Dec ember 7, 2020, the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court und er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and
co n cl u s i o n s of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evidentia ryinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order
. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.
Filed: June 16, 2021 Do not publish
# Den Europæiske Unions C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0871
  doi:10.3000/19770871.C_2012.040.dan |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 40 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 55. årgang11. februar 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0871

doi:10.3000/19770871.C_2012.040.dan

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 40

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

55. årgang11. februar 2012

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Øvrige meddelelser |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER |
| | Europa-Parlamentet |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Afgørelse | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

V   Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Parlamentet

2012/C 040/01

Afgørelse

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

V Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Parlamentet

| 11.2.2012 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 40/1

---

AFGØRELSE

2012/C 40/01

EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS GENERALSEKRETÆR HAR —

under henvisning til vedtægten for tjenestemænd i De Europæiske Fællesskaber og ansættelsesvilkårene for de øvrige ansatte i disse Fællesskaber, som fastsat ved Rådets forordning (EØF, Euratom, EKSF) nr. 259/68, senest ændret ved Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 723/2004, og særlig til artikel 30 i denne vedtægt,

under henvisning til Præsidiets afgørelse om udpegelse af ansættelsesmyndigheden, senest ændret den 26. oktober 2004,

under henvisning til bekendtgørelserne om følgende udvælgelsesprøver og ledige stillinger:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S og PE/110/S,

under henvisning til Det Paritetiske Samarbejdsudvalgs udtalelse på mødet den 26. oktober 2011 —

TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:

Eneste artikel

Gyldigheden af listerne over egnede ansøgere fra følgende almindelige udvælgelsesprøver og ansættelsesreserver:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S og PE/110/S

forlænges til den 31. december 2012.

Udfærdiget i Luxembourg, den 18. december 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Generalsekretær

---
#### Ex parte Tony Glen ALLRED. (Re: Tony Glen Allred v. State of Alabama).

79-845.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1980.

ADAMS, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
HomeEquatorial Guinea

# Equatorial Guinea

51 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Equatoguinean President Obiang	  February 23, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken At the Conservation, Climate Adaptation, and Just Energy Transition Forum	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022Walter E. Washington Convention CenterWashington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		On the Elections in Equatorial Guinea	  Ned PriceNovember 29, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Official Start of Equatorial Guinea’s Election Campaign Season	  Ned PriceNovember 3, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Equatorial Guinea National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Equatorial Guinea	  August 18, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Equatorial Guinea	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Equatorial Guinea	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Equatorial Guinea	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
HomeKosovo

# Kosovo

139 items

        -    Press Statement  		Welcoming the Agreement between Kosovo and Serbia	  Ned PriceNovember 23, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Urges Kosovo and Serbia to Take Immediate Steps to De-Escalate Tensions	  Ned PriceNovember 21, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 8, 2022	  Ned PriceNovember 8, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 31, 2022	  Ned PriceOctober 31, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The U.S. Urges Kosovo to Extend License Plate Implementation Deadline	  Ned PriceOctober 28, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 24, 2022	  Ned PriceOctober 24, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 19, 2022	  Vedant PatelOctober 19, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kosovan Prime Minister Kurti	  October 11, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Soccer Saves Lives:  New U.S. Effort in Ukraine to Reduce Risk of Explosive Hazards	  October 5, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Ambassador Van Schaack’s Remarks at UNGA Event  Protection of Victims, Witnesses, and “Insider Witnesses” In Atrocity Trials and Investigations	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 19, 2022The St. Regis HotelNew York 

previous page1…56789…14next page

Back to Top
Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

June, 1898.

Before Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

#### Kate Clokey as Administratrix, etc., of John T. Clokey, deceased, Respondent, v. The International Rubber Clothing *&*General Supply Co., Appellant

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

William Stuart for Appellant;

Robinson, Biddle & Ward for Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
EXHIBIT 35.1





World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB





I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of April 19, 2017 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A, as Issuing Entity, World
Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement,
has been made under my supervision.



(ii)To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under
the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 6, 2020





| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP. |                                                   
| | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
| |                            |                                                   
| |                            |                                                   
| | By:                        | /s/ Joseph Venezia                                
| |                            | Name: Joseph VeneziaTitle: Chief Financial Officer