alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Armenia and Georgia

# 									Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Armenia and Georgia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 14, 2024

Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew will travel to Armenia and Georgia from January 15-18. In both countries, he will discuss the current efforts and challenges to combatting corruption and identify areas for further cooperation. In Armenia, Coordinator Nephew will meet with government officials, including justice sector and law enforcement representatives, and participate in a civil society roundtable. In Georgia, he will meet with government officials, representatives of anti-corruption institutions, investigative bodies, and civil society.

Follow @StateCGAC on Twitter to learn more.

Tags

ArmeniaBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCorruptionGeorgiaOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsTravel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2587

To carry out the international obligations of the United States under the

Geneva Conventions to provide criminal penalties for certain war crimes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To carry out the international obligations of the United

States under the Geneva Conventions to provide criminal

penalties for certain war crimes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Crimes Act of

5 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN WAR CRIMES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting after chapter 117 the following:
2

•HR 2587 IH

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 118—WAR CRIMES

‘‘Sec.

‘‘2401. War crimes.

2 ‘‘§ 2401. War crimes

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, whether inside or out4 side the United States, commits a grave breach of the Ge5 neva conventions where the victim of such breach is mem6 ber of the armed forces of the United States or a citizen

7 of the United States, shall be fined under this title or im8 prisoned for life or any term or years, or both, and if death

9 results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty

10 of death.

11 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term

12 ‘grave breach of the Geneva conventions’ means conduct

13 defined as a grave breach in any of the international con14 ventions relating to the laws of warfare signed at Geneva

15 12 August 1949 or any protocol to any such convention,

16 to which the United States is a party.’’

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

18 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

19 inserting after the item relating to chapter 117 the follow20 ing new item:

‘‘118. War crimes ................................................................................ 2401’’.

Æ
# Armenia

242 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 21, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 21, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Justice Sector Reform Oversight in Armenia	  February 21, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan	  February 17, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 13, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 13, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 12, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 12, 2024 
        -    Department of Justice Release  		Queens Woman Sentenced to 25 Months in Prison for Leadership Role in Visa Fraud, Identity Theft and Human Smuggling Scheme	  January 30, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 18, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Armenia and Georgia	  January 14, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 4, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 4, 2024 WASHINGTON, D.C. 

previous page12345…25next page

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Along Mobile Technologies, Inc.., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (the
      "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Along Mobile Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by International Synergy
      Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A Along Mobile Technologies, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      July 11, 2006







/s/
      Jianwei Li


Jianwei
      Li


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer







/s/
      Zhen Wang


Zhen
      Wang


Chief
      Financial Officer
40499.

#### STEPHENS v. DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY.

Decided February 11, 1964.

*Northcutt ■& Edwards, W. S. Northcutt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Gambrell, Harlan, Bussell, Moye & Richardson, E. Smythe Gambrell, Robert R. Richardson,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

June Stephens filed suit against the Dover Elevator Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her when she tripped and fell while entering an automatic elevator which, according to the allegations of the petition: “was not standing at the level of the floor at which it opened, but the elevator door had opened for petitioner at a time when the elevator was standing (with the door open) with its floor between four and six inches above the level of the hall where petitioner stood outside while waiting to enter.” The trial court sustained the.general demurrer to the petition and the exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

While the plaintiff alleged that she was. without knowledge of the fact that the floor of the elevator was “between four and six inches” above the level of the floor on which she was standing, the allegations of the petition did not disclose any facts or circumstances, such as poor eyesight, the existence of an optical illusion, dim lighting or some distraction, which would have prevented her from observing the raised level of the elevator which was in plain view. Accordingly, the general allegation that she did not have knowledge of this fact must yield to the specific facts alleged which affirmatively disclosed that said condition was readily observable by the plaintiff and the attendant danger could have been avoided by her in the exercise of ordinary care for her own safety. For this reason the petition did not state a cause of action irrespective of the question of the negligence of the defendant. *Avary v. Anderson,*31 Ga. App. 402 (120 SE 683); *Peniston v. Newnan Hospital,*40 Ga. App. 367 (149 SE 715); *Lane Drug Stores v. Story,*72 Ga. App. 886 (35 SE2d 472); *King v. Davison-Paxon Co.,*104 Ga. App. 822, 823 (123 SE2d 269).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
# Burma

		Subscribe		

247 items

        -    		Burma	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burma	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Burma Summary	   
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Burma	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burma	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burma	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burma	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burma	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 

previous page1…22232425next page

Back to Top
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0350

Docket Number

2012-SW-050-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

AgustaWestland Bollettino Tecnico No. 119-47, dated March 29, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
#### Raymond FREDERICK a/k/a Billy Fedrick, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1153.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 3, 1981.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendel-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment and sentence imposed in Circuit Court Case No. *134576-2390 with directions to vacate on a holding that (1) the defendant’s two-year probationary term in Case No. 76-2390 expired well before the violations of probation occurred and rendered the judgment and sentence imposed on the defendant for such violations a nullity, *see Peyton v. State,*383 So.2d 737, 738 n.2 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); (2) the trial court’s subsequent *sua spohte*order which purported to modify the defendant’s probationary term, which the defendant had begun serving, by postponing its effective date (a) unlawfully subjected the defendant to increased punishment for the same offense, *Troupe v. Rowe,*283 So.2d 857 (Fla.1973), and (b) alternatively, was an unauthorized extension of the defendant’s probation, *see Section*948.06, Florida Statutes (1979); *Smith v. State,*377 So.2d 250 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); *Patrick v. State,*336 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

The defendant’s appeals from the judgments and sentences imposed in all cases except Circuit Court Case No. 76-2390 are affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, with directions to vacate the judgment and sentence imposed in Circuit Court Case No. 76-2390.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerome GREEN.

No. 64128.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

Howat A. Peters, Jr., Robert F. Barnard, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, counsel for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Julie C. LeBlanc, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Green was charged by bill of information with aggravated burglary in violation of La.R.S. 14:60. After trial by jury, defendant was found guilty as charged. After conviction, the district attorney filed *651an information accusing defendant of previous felony convictions pursuant to La.R.S. 15:529.1 (Habitual Offender Law). After hearing, the trial judge found defendant to be an habitual offender and sentenced him to serve twenty-five years at hard labor. On appeal, defendant relies on eight assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find no merit to defendant’s assignments of error. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction and sentence.

DECREE

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

October 24, 2017

v No. 333990

Kent Circuit Court

MONTY LAMAR JAMISON, LC No. 15-008063-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: MURRAY, P.J., and SAWYER and MARKEY, JJ.

SAWYER, J. (concurring).

I agree with the result reached by the majority, but I write separately because I do not 

believe that we need nor should engage in the analysis done by the majority. At most, defendant 

may have been entitled to withdraw his plea (which the trial court informed him of). People v 

Killebrew, 416 Mich 189, 209-210; 330 NW2d 834 (1982). But, for defendant to challenge this 

on appeal, he must have moved to withdraw his plea. MCR 6.310(D). Defendant did not do so. 

The failure to move to withdraw the plea precludes the plain-error analysis that the majority 

engages in. People v Armisted, 295 Mich App 32, 48; 822 NW2d 47 (2011).1 Accordingly, I 

would merely affirm the trial court based on defendant’s failure to move to withdraw his plea.

/s/ David H. Sawyer

 1 I recognize that the majority does rely on Armisted for the opposite proposition. But it relies on 

the wrong part of Armisted. On the page cited by the majority, p 46, Armisted merely sets out 

the basic plain error standard. But later, on page 48, Armisted makes it clear that the failure to 

move to withdraw a plea precludes any appellate review. See also People v Baham, ___ Mich 

App ___; ___ NW2d ___ (Docket No. 331787, issued 9/12/2017), slip op at 2.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Larry Richard v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 072

- C R

, 01

- 14

- 00073

- CR

Trial court case number: 1233998 , 1401120

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County

A ppellant, Larry Richard , has filed a “Motion to Abate ,” requesting that we remove the

case from the Court’s docket until the trial court has prepared findings of fact and conclusions of law on appellant’s motion to suppress

. W e deny the motion

. Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6( b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_

/s/ Terry Jennings



Date: September 16, 2014
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2633

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the Alameda

County Wastewater Reuse Project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate

in the Alameda County Wastewater Reuse Project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALAMEDA COUNTY WASTEWATER REUSE

4 PROJECT.

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior

6 is authorized to enter into agreements under the Reclama7 tion Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities

8 Act (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) with the Alameda County

9 Water District and the Union Sanitary District of Ala10 meda County and other appropriate authorities to partici-
2

•HR 2633 IH

1 pate in the design, planning, and construction of water

2 reuse projects to treat effluent from the Union Sanitary

3 District, in order to—

4 (1) provide new water supplies for industrial,

5 environmental, landscape, and other beneficial pur6 poses;

7 (2) reduce the demand for potable imported

8 water; and

9 (3) improve the water quality of the San Fran10 cisco Bay-Delta.

11 (b) COST SHARE.—The Secretary’s share of costs as12 sociated with any project described in subsection (a) shall

13 not exceed 50 percent of the total cost of that project.

14 The Secretary shall not provide funds for operation or

15 maintenance of any such project.

Æ
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0153 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM022AD

CSB 233W 3202 - 24 - 04, R1 --- 9/25/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### § 599.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
HomeJordan

# Jordan

211 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II	  May 26, 2021 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 26, 2021St. Regis HotelAmman, Jordan 
        -    Press Statement  		Jordan National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 24, 2021 
        -    		Travel to Jerusalem, Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman May 24-27, 2021	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing with Senior State Department Official on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Jerusalem, Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman	  May 24, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Jerusalem, Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman	  Ned PriceMay 24, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation With Jordan	  May 21, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Jordanian Foreign Minister Safadi	  May 17, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Jordan	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Jordanian Foreign Minister Safadi	  May 10, 2021 

previous page1…1314151617…22next page

Back to Top
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

126 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Discovery School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Tegucigalpa, Honduras: American School of Tegucigalpa: 2024 Special Need Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		New Listings Under the Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report	  Matthew MillerDecember 21, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Steps to Impose Visa Restrictions in Response to Violent Anti-Democratic Actions in Honduras	  Matthew MillerDecember 12, 2023 
        -    DSS Releases  		Honduran national gets 50 years for kidnapping and raping 15-year-old	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Indigenous Youth Leadership Coalition Launches with Arrival of Inaugural Cohort	  November 6, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Discovery School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Tegucigalpa, Honduras: American School of Tegucigalpa: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Honduras National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2023 
        -    Child Protection  		Honduran national convicted after cross-country trip against minor’s will	  August 24, 2023 

123…13next page

Back to Top
#### Salvatore RICCI, Petitioner, v. Sheriff HARDCASTLE, Respondent.

No. 74-615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 23, 1974.

Habeas corpus denied.
|  EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------------------|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY  /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Connie Woods Hawkins     |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |  Date:  November 8 , 2010  |

----
# C_2005182EN.01003901.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/39

---

Action brought on 27 April 2005 by Martine Heus against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-173/05)

(2005/C 182/72)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 27 April 2005 by Martine Heus, Anderlecht (Belgium), represented by Lucas Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 7 January 2005 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on 18 October 2004 against the decision of 19 July 2004 adopted by the chairman of the selection board in competition COM/PC/04 refusing to admit the applicant to that competition; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 7 January 2005 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on 18 October 2004 against the decision of 19 July 2004 adopted by the chairman of the selection board in competition COM/PC/04 refusing to admit the applicant to that competition;

| 2. | annul, to the extent necessary, the decision adopted on 19 July 2004 by the chairman of the selection board in competition COM/PC/04; |
| --- | --- |

2.

annul, to the extent necessary, the decision adopted on 19 July 2004 by the chairman of the selection board in competition COM/PC/04;

| 3. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was refused admission to competition COM/PC/04 on the ground that she did not fulfil the requirement of five years' seniority within the Commission or another institution, as the periods of professional activity she had spent in the Commission on a temporary basis were not taken into account by the selection board in the competition.

In support of her application the applicant relies on pleas of breach of Articles 27 and 29(1) of the Staff Regulations and a manifest error of assessment in so far as the contested decisions and the notice of competition, or in any event the interpretation given to them by the appointing authority, resulted in the rejection of the applicant for reasons relating solely to her former administrative status (as member of the contract staff rather than a member of staff covered by the Conditions of Employment).

The applicant also relies on a plea of breach of the principle of non-discrimination, in so far as the criteria at issue allowed other candidates to be admitted to the competition although they were less competent or had less professional experience within the Commission.

---