alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #27, July 9 - 15, 2008

Unusually hot temperatures continue across most of 

Afghanistan. The high temperatures, and below normal 

snow pack, depleted much of the countries snow pack 4 – 

6 weeks earlier than normal. Snow pack is critical 

because it is used for irrigation in lowland areas. High 

temperatures have also led to increased evaporation from 

water reservoirs threatening water availability for crop 

production and pasture. 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan was below 

average from October - May as well, and as a result 

underground water sources, which are used for both 

drinking water and irrigation, have not been replenished. 

(See Figure 2) The cumulative effect of this situation will 

have a direct bearing on most households, who rely on 

agriculture and livestock for their income and food needs. 

We are now in the dry season (See Figure 3) and only 

light showers are expected along the Pakistan border. 

For the upcoming week, maximum temperatures will 

exceed 38 °C in the lowlands and weekly temperatures 

will average 4 to 6 °C above normal across much of the 

country. 

1) Much of Afghanistan has received below normal

precipitation during the winter and spring along with an

early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures above 38 °C)

will affect the lowlands of Afghanistan and continue to

increase water evaporation.

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan as of July 1, 

2008 

Figure 2. Irrigation supply percent of average as of 

June 30. 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS 

Figure 3. Total estimated rainfall June 30 – July 6 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, NOAA
§ 10.10 Ceiling price for a covered outpatient drug. A manufacturer is required to calculate the 340B ceiling price for each covered outpatient drug, by National Drug Code (NDC) on a quarterly basis. ( a ) *Calculation of 340B ceiling price.* The 340B ceiling price for a covered outpatient drug is equal to the Average Manufacturer Price (AMP) from the preceding calendar quarter for the smallest unit of measure minus the Unit Rebate Amount (URA) and will be calculated using six decimal places. HRSA will publish the 340B ceiling price rounded to two decimal places.
( b ) *Exception.* When the ceiling price calculation in paragraph (a) of this section results in an amount less than $0.01 the ceiling price will be $0.01.
( c ) *New drug price estimation.* A manufacturer must estimate the 340B ceiling price for a new covered outpatient drug as of the date the drug is first available for sale. That estimation should be calculated as wholesale acquisition cost minus the appropriate rebate percentage until an AMP is available, which should occur no later than the 4th quarter that the drug is available for sale. Manufacturers are required to calculate the actual 340B ceiling price as described in paragraph (a) of this section and offer to refund or credit the covered entity the difference between the estimated 340B ceiling price and the actual 340B ceiling price within 120 days of the determination by the manufacturer that an overcharge occurred.
HomeAngola

# Angola

92 items

        -    Press Statement  		Angolan National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 11, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Call to End Renewed Violence in Eastern DRC	  Ned PriceOctober 31, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Angola	  October 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks at the Strengthening Atlantic Cooperation Ministerial Meeting	  September 20, 2022Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Press Statement  		Angola Presidential Elections	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Angola	  September 9, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Angola Elections	  Vedant PatelAugust 29, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 24, 2022	  Vedant PatelAugust 24, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Diplomatic Representation for Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe Moves to U.S. Embassy Luanda	  August 11, 2022 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
§ 589.213 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
§ 110.74 Disapproval of benefits. ( a ) If the Secretary determines that a requester is not eligible for payments under the Program, the Secretary will disapprove the Request for Benefits and provide the requester, or his or her representative, with written notice of the basis for the disapproval, and the right to reconsideration of the determination, as provided in § 110.90.
( b ) The Secretary may disapprove a Request for Benefits even before the requester has submitted all the required documentation (*e.g.,* the Secretary may determine that a requester did not meet the filing deadline, or that a covered countermeasure was not used or administered).
( c ) The Secretary may re-open a disapproved Request for Benefits on her own accord should medical or scientific evidence later become available to justify a re-determination of the disapproval of eligibility or payments. In extraordinary circumstances, to be determined at the Secretary's discretion, she may re-open a disapproved Request for Benefits even after the requester has exercised the right to reconsideration and the disapproval determination has been upheld in accordance with the procedures set out in § 110.90.
Exhibit 21
 LSI CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
 Entity Name
    
    State/Country of FormationLSI (Spain) Technology Development S.L
    
    SpainLSI (Thai) Ltd.
    
    ThailandLSI Asia Pacific Corporation
    
    DelawareLSI China Technology (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaLSI China Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaLSI Corporation of Canada, Company
    
    CanadaLSI Holdings Corporation
    
    DelawareLSI International LLC
    
    DelawareLSI Investments Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeLSI Israel Ltd.
    
    IsraelLSI Logic AB
    
    SwedenLSI Logic Asia, Inc.
    
    DelawareLSI Logic Europe Limited
    
    United KingdomLSI Logic GmbH
    
    GermanyLSI Logic HK Holdings
    
    Cayman IslandsLSI Logic Hong Kong Ltd.
    
    Hong KongLSI Logic Hungary LLC
    
    HungaryLSI Logic International Services, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaLSI Logic K.K.
    
    JapanLSI Logic Malta Ltd.
    
    MaltaLSI Logic Netherlands B.V.
    
    NetherlandsLSI Logic s.r.l.
    
    ItalyLSI Logic SAS
    
    FranceLSI Logic Singapore Ltd.
    
    SingaporeLSI Logic Storage Systems Europe Holdings Ltd.
    
    IrelandLSI Management Services Corporation
    
    DelawareLSI Research (India) Private Limited
    
    IndiaLSI Research & Development Pune Private Ltd.
    
    IndiaLSI Research International LLC
    
    RussiaLSI Storage Cyprus Limited
    
    CyprusLSI Storage Ireland Limited
    
    IrelandLSI Technologies India Private Ltd.
    
    IndiaLSI Technologies Israel Ltd.
    
    IsraelLSI Technology (Beijing) Company Ltd.
    
    ChinaLSI Technology (Ireland) Design Ltd
    
    IrelandLSI Technology (Ireland) Limited
    
    IrelandLSI Technology (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeLSI Technology Investments S.L
    
    SpainLSI Technology Limited
    
    United KingdomMetta Technology (Mauritius)
    
    MauritiusSilicon Manufacturing Partners Pte Ltd. (SMP)*
    
    SingaporeSubLSI (Korea) Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaVelio Communications International Inc.
    
    Cayman IslandsAgere Systems American Parkway LP
    
    DelawareAgere Systems Inc.
    
    Delaware




---



##### 



Entity Name
    
    State/Country of FormationAgere Systems LVCC LLC
    
    DelawareAgere Systems Nederland B.V.
    
    Netherlands
 
 *
    
    51% LSI Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd.; 49% GLOBALFOUNDRIES.
# C_2005217EN.01005401.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/54

---

Action brought on 18 July 2005 by The Procter & Gamble Company against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-263/05)

(2005/C 217/111)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 July 2005 by The Procter & Gamble Company, established in Cincinnati, Ohio (USA), represented by G. Kuipers, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 3 May 2005 (Case R 845/2004-1) in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 3 May 2005 (Case R 845/2004-1) in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94;

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Community trade mark concerned: | The three dimensional mark consisting of a square white tablet showing a lilac four petalled floral design for goods in class 3 (Washing and bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; preparations for the washing cleaning and care of dishes; soaps;...) — application No 1 683 713 |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner: | Refusal of the application |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94. |

Community trade mark concerned:

The three dimensional mark consisting of a square white tablet showing a lilac four petalled floral design for goods in class 3 (Washing and bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; preparations for the washing cleaning and care of dishes; soaps;...) — application No 1 683 713

Decision of the examiner:

Refusal of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94.

---
697 A.2d 289

#### In the Matter of Christine M. FLOWERS.

No. 24 DB 97.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 13, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 1997, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 15, 1997, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that CHRISTINE M. FLOWERS, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
“I am pleased to be part of this effort and see all 

seven organizations working together to get more utilities engaged in performance measurement to increase public confidence in our sector” 

Billy Turner, President 

Columbus Water Works 

Collaborating Organizations 

 

Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies 

www.amwa.net

American Public Works Association 

www.apwa.net

American Water Works Association 

www.awwa.org

National Association of Clean Water Agencies 

www.nacwa.org

National Association of Water Companies 

www.nawc.org

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

www.epa.gov

Water Environment Federation 

www.wef.org

Eff

Utility 

S

Manag

Clea

“This effort provides water utilities with a helpful roadmap to excellence as they strive to manage their systems for today’s customers and for future generations.” 

Gary Zimmerman, Executive Director 

American Water Works Association 

EPA 832-F-08-052 

February 2008 
Effective Utility Management: 

The Key to Sustainability Drinking water and wastewater utilities in cities and towns across the nation provide a vital service in protecting public health and the environment. These water utilities face critical challenges including: rising costs, increasing performance requirements, energy and climate considerations and aging infrastructure. In May 2007, six national water utility professional organizations and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed an historic agreement identifying Ten Attributes of Effectively Managed Water Sector Utilities and agreed to promote their use in effective utility management across the water sector. Sound local wastewater and drinking water infrastructure is not only essential to the protection of public health, it is a foundation of robust local and regional economies. These attributes are what effectively managed utilities focus on to achieve long-term sustainability. 

Ten Attributes of Effectively Managed Water Sector Utilities Product Quality 

Employee and Leadership Development Financial Viability Community Sustainability Stakeholder Understanding and Support Customer Satisfaction Operational Optimization Operational Resiliency Infrastructure Stability Water Resource Adequacy 

 “This significant agreement charts a course, locally 

and globally, for wise management of water 

systems and precious water resources.” 

Benjamin H. Grumbles 

Assistant Administrator for Water 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

In addition to the Attributes, the May 2007 Agreement identifies five Keys to Management Success, 

designed to assist utility managers in the implementation of these Attributes. These five focus areas provide a pathway to facilitate implementation of the Attributes. 

Keys to Ma

 Leade Strate Organ Measu Contin

  Looking to The partnering successful attribproducts to helunder this framethe following: • Implementat

current operattributes an

• Utility perfor

gauge progr

• On-line Reso

resources ansuccess. 

Copies of the agretions for a Water Ulines the Attributes and other relevant found at www.epasites of the collabo
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725261
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         145,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,921
<PP&E>                                      30,206,170
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,842,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 646,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     605,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   646,590
<SALES>                                        125,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Luke PETROVICH, Albert J. Beshel, Lennard H. Mackenroth and Michael E. Kirby.

No. 80-K-2491.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 21, 1980.

In re Luke Petrovich, Albert J. Beshel, Lennard Mackenroth and Michael E. Kirby, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Plaquemines. Nos. 58258, 58259, 58260 and 58261.

Granted.
# L_2020424EN.01005701.xml

| 15.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 424/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 424/57

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/2077

of 8 December 2020

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 10 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1), and in particular Article 44 thereof,

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2020 was definitively adopted on 27 November 2019
   (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2020 was definitively adopted on 27 November 2019
   (2),

2

| — | on 9 October 2020, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 10 to the general budget for the financial year 2020, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 9 October 2020, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 10 to the general budget for the financial year 2020,

| — | in view of a timely adoption by the European Parliament of this draft amending budget before the end of the financial year 2020, the Council needs to proceed without delay to the adoption of its position on draft amending budget No 10 to the general budget for 2020. Therefore, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, the eight-week period for the information of national Parliaments laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1, |
| --- | --- |

—

in view of a timely adoption by the European Parliament of this draft amending budget before the end of the financial year 2020, the Council needs to proceed without delay to the adoption of its position on draft amending budget No 10 to the general budget for 2020. Therefore, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, the eight-week period for the information of national Parliaments laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 10 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 was adopted on 8 December 2020.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, on 8 December 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 57, 27.2.2020, p. 1.

2

---
No. 99-8821.

#### Woodard *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeAzerbaijan

# Azerbaijan

261 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien and USAID Assistant Administrator Erin McKee	  James O’BrienApril 5, 2024Brussels Hub 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Azerbaijani President Aliyev	  April 3, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 6, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 6, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 21, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 21, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Azerbaijani President Aliyev	  February 17, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 17, 2024Bayerischer HofMunich, Germany 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan	  February 17, 2024 

previous page1234…27next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 23.1














Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-171067, 333-164026, 333-130271, 333-121334, 333-106385, 333-57046, and 333-17513; Form S-3 Nos. 333-171252, 333-160572 and 333-139975) of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated July 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2011.











/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Irvine, California


July 14, 2011
HomeLaos

# Laos

77 items

        -    Report  		2021 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 4, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Laos	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Laos	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Mekong-U.S. Partnership Senior Officials’ Meeting	  June 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Laos	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Laos	  May 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Laos	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		34th U.S.-ASEAN Dialogue	  May 6, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Lao New Year 2021	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 14, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Laos	  March 30, 2021 

previous page1…345678next page

Back to Top
114 STAT. 2570 PUBLIC LAW 106–539—DEC. 7, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 127:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Dec. 7, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–539

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘December 8, 2000’’.

Approved December 7, 2000.

Ante, p. 2562.

Dec. 7, 2000

[H.J. Res. 127]