alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005144EN.01000101.xml

| 14.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 June 2005

(2005/C 144/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2062 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6683 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2665 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5379 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8485 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,574 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,998 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6958 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0372 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 160 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,43 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,645 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6631 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,586 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5165 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,381 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7132 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0247 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 220,8 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2891 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9831 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,315 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 615,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5846 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,552 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,339 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2062

JPY

Japanese yen

131,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6683

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2665

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5379

ISK

Iceland króna

79,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8485

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,574

CZK

Czech koruna

29,998

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6958

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0372

ROL

Romanian leu

36 160

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,43

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,645

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6631

AUD

Australian dollar

1,586

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5165

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,381

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7132

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0247

KRW

South Korean won

1 220,8

ZAR

South African rand

8,2891

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9831

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,315

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 615,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5846

PHP

Philippine peso

66,552

RUB

Russian rouble

34,339

THB

Thai baht

49,345

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Harold Wayne MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeBulgaria

# Bulgaria

107 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Bitter Travels to Nicosia, Frankfurt, Bucharest, and Sofia	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Sofia, Bulgaria: Anglo-American School of Sofia: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		NATO Accession Anniversaries for Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovakia, Slovenia	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Bulgaria National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 3, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bulgarian Prime Minister Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolai Denkov Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 16, 2024Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bulgaria	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes the Republic of Bulgaria to the Artemis Accords	  November 9, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Elizabeth Allen’s Travel to Norway, Bulgaria, and the Czech Republic	  October 27, 2023 

123…11next page

Back to Top
No. 99-8831.

#### Truitt *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeChina

# China

925 items

        -    TIAS  		China (07-1211) – Agreement on the Safety of Drugs and Medical Devices	  December 11, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		China (07-1129) – Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Certain Measures Granting Refunds, Reductions or Exemptions from Taxes or Other Payments	  November 29, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		China (06-727) – Protocol Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Mineral and Earth Sciences	  July 27, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		China (05-1020.1) – Agreement for Promotion of Aviation Safety	  October 20, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		China (03-1117) – Agreement on the Conditions of Construction of new Embassy Complexes in Washington and Beijing	  November 17, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		China (13029) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance in Customs Matters	  April 10, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		China (13102) – Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  March 8, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		China (00-1101) – Memorandum of Understanding concerning the Provision of Properties in Washington, D.C., Beijing, and Guangzhou	  November 1, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		China (12969) – Agreement Concerning the United States Volunteer Program in China	  June 29, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		China (12968) – Agreement on Cooperation Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy	  June 29, 1998 

previous page1…90919293next page

Back to Top
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2853

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory

products of Bulgaria.treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2853

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Bulgaria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2853 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND SUPPLE2 MENTAL ACTION.

3 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds

4 that Bulgaria—

5 (1) has received most-favored-nation treatment

6 since 1991 and has been found to be in full compli7 ance with the freedom of emigration requirements

8 under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 since 1993;

9 (2) has reversed many years of Communist dic10 tatorship and instituted a constitutional republic

11 ruled by a democratically elected government as well

12 as basic market-oriented reforms, including privat13 ization;

14 (3) is in the process of acceding to the General

15 Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the

16 World Trade Organization (WTO), and extension of

17 unconditional most-favored-nation treatment would

18 enable the United States to avail itself of all rights

19 under the GATT and the WTO with respect to Bul20 garia; and

21 (4) has demonstrated a strong desire to build

22 friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the

23 United States on trade matters.

24 (b) SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.—The Congress notes

25 that the United States Trade Representative intends to

26 negotiate with Bulgaria in order to preserve the commit-
3

•HR 2853 EH

1 ments of that country under the bilateral commercial

2 agreement in effect between that country and the United

3 States that are consistent with the GATT and the WTO.

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

5 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO BULGARIA.

6 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN7 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith8 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

9 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

10 (1) determine that such title should no longer

11 apply to Bulgaria; and

12 (2) after making a determination under para13 graph (1) with respect to Bulgaria, proclaim the ex14 tension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most15 favored-nation treatment) to the products of that

16 country.

17 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

18 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub19 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod-
4

•HR 2853 EH

1 ucts of Bulgaria, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

2 cease to apply to that country.

Passed the House of Representatives March 5,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2005217EN.01001501.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 21 July 2005

in Case C-515/03: (Reference for a preliminary ruling, Finanzgericht Hamburg) in Eichsfelder Schlachtbetrieb GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (1)

1

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Export refunds - Conditions for granting them - Import of the product into the non-member country of destination - Meaning - Customs formalities for release for consumption in the non-member country - Substantial processing or working - Reimportation into the Community - Abuse of law)

(2005/C 217/28)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-515/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), made by decision of 12 November 2003, received at the Court on 9 December 2003, in the proceedings between Eichsfelder Schlachtbetrieb GmbH and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), S. von Bahr, J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 July 2005, in which it ruled:

The condition for obtaining a differentiated export refund laid down in Article 17(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1384/95 of 19 June 1995, as regards in particular the adjustments necessary for the implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, namely clearance through customs for release of the product concerned for consumption in the non-member country of destination, is fulfilled where that product, on which import duties were paid in that country, undergoes substantial processing or working there within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, even if the product deriving from such processing or working is then re-exported to the Community, with reimbursement of the duties levied in that country and payment of customs import duties in the Community.

In those circumstances, reimbursement of the export refund may nevertheless be required if the national court considers that evidence of an abusive practice on the part of the exporter has been produced, in accordance with the rules of national law.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 06.03.2004.

1

---
·--- -**~. ~.--.----c--_**  ... _

U.S. Departrii-ent Assistant Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 of Transpqi'!s;:.,fion Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation 

### JUN 1 0 

## 2010

The Honorable Rick Perry Governor ofTexas Austin, TX 78711-2428

en Dear Governor Perry: Thank you for your letter supporting the application for antitrust immunity filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. I am responding on behalfofthe Secretary. , As you may know, the applicants-members ofthe oneworld Alliance-are seeking antitrust immunity to closely coordinate flights between the United States and Asia. According to the application, the alliance partners plan to launch itjointventure for transpacific traffic. The application is administered in a public docket, which ensures that interested parties have the opportunity to comment. The U.S. Department ofTransportation (DOT) will evaluate the

-- application accordingto rigorous statutory standards, beginning with a review ofthe record to determine ifit is substantially complete. Decisions on the application are made in consultation with the U.S. Department ofJustice's Antitrust Division following a thorough analysis of competitive factors. As this matter is nowpending, I hope you understand that I cannot

.commentonthe merits ofthe application. I can assure you, however, that DOT will give full and fair consideration to·the application as well as any comments filed inthe docket. As is ournormal practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and thisresponse in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0059 as a contact outside the record in this matter. I appreciate your interest in this proceeding. ' Sincerely yours,

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International AffairsS 1 0-100312-042 

# ..
HomeQatar

# Qatar

215 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to Embassy Doha and Mission Afghanistan	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 7, 2021St. Regis HotelDoha, Qatar 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary Lloyd J. Austin at Top of Meeting with Afghan Interpreters	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 7, 2021Al Udeid Airbase, Qatar 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary Lloyd J. Austin at Meet and Greet with U.S. Military and Interagency Team	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 7, 2021Al Udeid Airbase, Qatar 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin, Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, and Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Dr. Khalid bin Mohammed Al Attiyah at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 7, 2021Doha, Qatar 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Qatari Amir Sheikh Al Thani	  September 6, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Secretary Blinken Travels to Qatar To Advance Bilateral Ties	  September 6, 2021 
        -    		Travel to Qatar and Germany, September 5-8, 2021	   
        -    Special Briefing  		On the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Qatar and Germany	  Dean ThompsonSeptember 3, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Qatar and Germany	  Ned PriceSeptember 3, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani 	  September 1, 2021 

previous page1…1516171819…22next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project 
Presentations for FY08 and FY09, (5) Project Voting by RAC Members, (6) 
General Discussion, (7) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 28, 2009, from 1:30 p.m. 
and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names 
and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, Designated Federal Official, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Ellis, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-3316; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a8a4b1b1ada0b2a0a9a9acb685a3b6eba3a0a1ebb0b6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea878b9e9e828f9d8f86868399aa8c99c48c8f8ec49f99">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of 
the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and 
individuals who made written requests by September 21, 2009 have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: August 25, 2009.
Eduardo Olmedo,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E9-21073 Filed 9-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130848 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DAVID DARITY, Persona l Representative of Stephen J. Markman, the Estate of Frank Darity, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130848 COA: 256481 Wayne CC: 03-317616-NO CITY OF FLAT ROCK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
#### Thomas Reid PORTER v. Faye Massey PORTER (Williams).

No. 52916.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 7, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1981.

Dan R. Wise, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Bryan, Nelson, Allen, Schroeder & Randolph, Michael K. Randolph, Hattiesburg, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jackson County; Kenneth B. Robertson, Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and BROOM and HAWKINS, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3035 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3035

 To provide for a special application of section 1034 of the Internal 
                         Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1996

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a special application of section 1034 of the Internal 
                         Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in the case of 
Rita Bennington--
            (1) who purchased her new principal residence (within the 
        meaning of section 1034 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) 
        in January 1992, and
            (2) who was unable to meet the requirements of such section 
        with respect to the sale of an old principal residence until 
        May 1994, because of unexpected delays caused by Hurricane 
        Iniki,
the Secretary of the Treasury, in the administration of section 1034 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, shall apply subsection (a) of such 
section by substituting ``2.5 years'' for ``2 years'' each place it 
appears.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

p0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141740

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141740 COA: 298847 Berrien CC: 2005-408443-FH MIKEL EARL POSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 4, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 800.236 Party to a transaction. ( a ) The term *party to a transaction* means: ( 1 ) In the case of an acquisition of an ownership interest in an entity, the person acquiring the ownership interest, the person from whom such ownership interest is acquired, and the entity whose ownership interest is being acquired, without regard to any person providing brokerage or underwriting services for the transaction;
( 2 ) In the case of a merger, the surviving entity, and the entity or entities that are merged with or into that entity in the transaction;
( 3 ) In the case of a consolidation, the entities being consolidated, and the new consolidated entity;
( 4 ) In the case of a proxy solicitation, the person soliciting proxies, and the person who issued the voting interest;
( 5 ) In the case of the acquisition or conversion of contingent equity interests, the issuer and the person holding the contingent equity interests;
( 6 ) In the case of a change in rights that a person has with respect to an entity in which that person has an investment, the person whose rights change as a result of the transaction and the entity to which those rights apply;
( 7 ) In the case of any other transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement, the structure of which is designed or intended to evade or circumvent the application of section 721, any person that participates in such transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement;
( 8 ) In the case of any other type of transaction, any person who is in a role comparable to that of a person described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (7) of this section; and
( 9 ) In all cases, each party that submitted a declaration or notice to the Committee regarding a transaction.
( b ) For purposes of section 721(l), the term *party to a transaction* includes any affiliate of any party described in paragraph (a) of this section that the Committee, or a lead agency acting on behalf of the Committee, determines is relevant to mitigating a risk to the national security of the United States.