alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vincent A. Witcher, Respondent, *against*George Jones, as Treasurer of The New York Times, Appellant.

(Decided May 9th, 1889.)

An order for the examination of a non-resident plaintiff may be made, but must be served upon the party within the state; and where it appears at the time the order is returnable, that the party has not come and is not expected to come within the jurisdiction before trial, it is discretionary with the court to vacate the order without prejudice.

Appeal from an order of this court vacating an order for the examination before trial of plaintiff in the action.

The action was brought against defendant as treasurer of the joint stock association publishing a newspaper, for damages *244for the publication in such newspaper of an alleged libel concerning plaintiff. An order for the examination of plaintiff before trial was made, but was not served on him; and on motion of his attorneys, made on affidavits showing that plaintiff was a resident of the state of Virginia, and that he had not been and was not expected within the state of New York before the trial, an order was made vacating the order for his examination, with leave to defendant to apply again for such examination on proof that plaintiff had come within the state. From this order defendant appealed.

Townsend, Dyett, & *Einstein,*for appellant.

*Maltby,*Bayne, & *Marshall,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

[Present, Larremore, Ch. J., Dalv and Bookstaver, JJ.]—In our opinion, this order was properly granted. There seems to be no reason why an order for the examination of a plaintiff who is a non-resident of the state shouldnot be made, but the order must be served upon the party within the state in order to make it effectual; and if it appears at the time that the order is returnable that the party has not come and is not expected to come within the jurisdiction, it is discretionary for the court to vacate the order,without prejudice to an application for a further order when he is found or expected to arrive within the jurisdiction. So that the Chief Justice in granting the order was entirely regular, and so was Judge Allen in revoking it. *We*think that the decision was in accordance with the authorities.

It may be that where an order has never been revoked by the court which granted it (as in the Dudley case), and is outstanding, it must be observed by the court and the parties in all proceedings dependent upon it. But in this case the court upon an application for the purpose revoked the order, and properly, because the plaintiff was not within the state from the' time it was granted until the return day, and is not expected before trial. We think that the Special Term had the power, and under the circumstances, we think it was *245rightly exercised. A new order will be granted whenever the party is expected within the state.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Order affirmed, with costs.
# Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Releases

368 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Proposals for NGO Programs Benefiting Displaced Persons in Al-Hol and Roj Camps, Syria	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024Brussels Melsbroek AirportBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Palestinian Authority President Abbas	  April 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to Saudi Arabia and Oman	  April 1, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Cameroon and Chad	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs in South Sudan Responding to the Ongoing Sudan Crisis	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Gallant	  March 25, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Supporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand, Malaysia, Nepal, and India	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		United States to Provide Additional Humanitarian Assistance to Sudanese People and Host Communities	  Matthew MillerMarch 20, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Vulnerable PRM Populations of Concern in South America	  March 18, 2024 

previous page1234…37next page

Back to Top
§ 584.205 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
§ 1003.120 Liability for penalties and assessments. ( a ) In any case in which it is determined that more than one person was responsible for a violation described in this part, each such person may be held liable for the penalty prescribed by this part.
( b ) In any case in which it is determined that more than one person was responsible for a violation described in this part, an assessment may be imposed, when authorized, against any one such person or jointly and severally against two or more such persons, but the aggregate amount of the assessments collected may not exceed the amount that could be assessed if only one person was responsible.
( c ) Under this part, a principal is liable for penalties and assessments for the actions of his or her agent acting within the scope of his or her agency. This provision does not limit the underlying liability of the agent.
[81 FR 88356, Dec. 7, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7044

RAMONE STEPHON JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-01107-AW)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramone Stephon Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ramone Stephon Jones seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on July 1, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on August 4, 

2011.*

 *

Jones did not date his notice of appeal. For the purpose 

of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the 

envelope containing the notice of appeal is the earliest date it 

could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 

487 U.S. 266 (1988).

Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Germany

399 items

        -    Report  		Germany	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Germany	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Germany	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Germany	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Nineteenth Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee Record of Meeting November 16, 2016	  November 16, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Germany (16-927) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 27, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Germany (14-730) – Amendment Two to the Agreement Concerning In-Service Support of the Rolling Airframe Missile MK-31 Guided Missile Weapon System	  July 30, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Germany (14-210) – Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation on the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On Mission	  February 10, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Germany (13-1211) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance with Respect to Information and Reporting Provisions Commonly Known as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  December 11, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Germany (13-917.2) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 17, 2013 

previous page1…353637383940next page

Back to Top
RO 13039 9443.1987(19)

AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CO RROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC

SEP 14 1987

Mr. Stuart J. Gock

Environmental Coordinator Printing Developments, Inc.

2010 Indiana Street

Racine, WI 53405

Dear Mr. Gock:

The following information is being provided in response to your letter of April 6, 1987, regarding the definition of aqueous as used in the Corrosivity Characteristic, 40 CFR Part 261.22(a)(1).

As you are aware, the corrosivity characteristic does not specifically define what constitutes an aqueous waste. However, we have developed guidance in defining the term "aqueous." In particular, we consider a waste to be aqueous if it has a liquid phase containing more than 50 percent water." (See attached letter from Dr. John Skinner, Director of the Office of Solid Waste, on February 26, 1985.) This position is currently in effect and you should use the 50 percent water cut-off as a basis for evaluating whether or not to test your wastes for corrosivity.

I should point out that we are considering reviewing this position, as well as the need for a regulatory definition of aqueous waste. Therefore, you should be aware that a regulatory definition of aqueous may be proposed at some point in the

future.

If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate

to contact me.

Sincerely,

Robert Scarberry, Acting Chief

Waste Characterization Branch

Attachment
# C_2020338EN.01000201.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/2

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 9 October 2020

on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(2020/C 338/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 283(2) and 139(2) thereof,

Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL THAT:

Mr Frank ELDERSON be appointed as a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 15 December 2020.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---
§ 1002.3 General authority. ( a ) In addition to any other authority it may have, a State may exclude an individual or entity from participation in the Medicaid program for any reason for which the Secretary could exclude that individual or entity from participation in Federal health care programs under sections 1128, 1128A, or 1866(b)(2) of the Act.
( b ) Nothing contained in this part should be construed to limit a State's own authority to exclude an individual or entity from Medicaid for any reason or period authorized by State law.
[57 FR 3343, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 39428, July 22, 1999. Redesignated and amended at 82 FR 4118, Jan. 12, 2017]
§ 597.501 Effect of license or authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, shall be deemed to authorize or validate any transaction effected prior to the issuance of the license, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license is issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any provision of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction or license specifically refers to such provision.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction otherwise prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition or prohibitions contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property which would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2860

To repeal restrictive provisions of Federal law relating to colored margarine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1996

Mr. WHITFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To repeal restrictive provisions of Federal law relating to

colored margarine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COLORED MARGARINE.

4 (a) FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT.—

5 (1) SECTION 301.—Paragraph (m) of section

6 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

7 (21 U.S.C. 331) is repealed.

8 (2) SECTION 407.—Section 407 of the Federal

9 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 347) is

10 repealed.
2

•HR 2860 IH

1 (b) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT.—Section 15

2 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 55) is

3 amended—

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘(a)’’ and by striking paragraph (2), and

6 (2) by repealing subsection (f).

7 (c) ACT OF MARCH 16, 1950.—Sections 3(a) and 6

8 of the Act of March 16, 1950 (21 U.S.C. 347a, 347b)

9 are repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Executive
Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend
Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes    
|Larry G. Gerdes        
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 3, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                      2,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,422
<PP&E>                                           2,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,314
<COMMON>                                           179
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,900
<SALES>                                         18,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,623
<CGS>                                           11,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (173)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    169
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.010
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.010
        

</TABLE>
#### § 800.234 Own.

Solely for the purposes of column 2 of appendix A to this part, the term *own* means to directly possess the applicable covered investment critical infrastructure.
### No. 14-15-00101-CV

RICARDO G. CEDILLO, JASON C. ZEHNER, J. RUSSELL DAVIS, and DAVIS, CEDILLO & MENDOZA, INC.,Appellants, v. IMMOBILIERE JEUNESS ESTABLISSEMENT, Appellee.

APPELLANTS’ ORAL ARGUMENT EXHIBITS ACCEPTED 14-15-00101-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/9/2015 10:14:56 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

### Timeline –IJE v. Davis, Cedillo, & Mendoza Inc. et al.

2012 August 12 Case filed (CR9) September 17 DCM files Original Answer Subject to Motion

to Transfer Venue (CR42) November 2 Motion to Transfer Venue denied (CR262) 2013 January 18 DCM issues written discovery to Plaintiffs (CR1654; CR1642) January 24 Plaintiffs issue written discovery to DCM (CR1620; CR1631) February 26 DCM files Motion for Abatement (CR 265) March 8 Motion for Abatement granted, case abated (CR 312) March 14 Plaintiffs file Motion to Clarify Ruling on

Abatement (CR 313) April 5 Court issues revised order granting Motion for

Abatement (CR 343) June 5 Plaintiffs file Motion to Reconsider and/or Lift

Abatement (CR 346) July 12 Court denies Motion to Reconsider (CR 375) July 30 Plaintiffs file Second Motion to Reconsider and

Lift Abatement (CR 378) August 12 Court denies Second Motion to Reconsider (CR 639) September 4 Plaintiffs file Petition for Writ of Mandamus (CR 641) 2014 February 6 Court of Appeals issues order affirming abatement as to IJE and reversing it as to 9.2 Louetta and 29 Kuykendahl (CR 1356)
February 26 Court issues Amended Order on Abatement (CR 1377) June 27 IJE registers to do business in Texas (CR 1434) July 16 Plaintiffs file Motion to Lift Abatement (CR 1428) August 15 Court lifts abatement (CR 1439) September 4 Court issues docket control order (CR 1440) December 5 DCM files Motion to Compel Arbitration (CR 1463)
#### Joseph COLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH et al., Appellees.

No. 74-279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 591.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
#### § 903.4 Exception to termination.

When a significant enforcement policy is involved, or recovery of a judgment is a prerequisite to the imposition of administrative sanctions, agencies may refer debts for litigation even though termination of collection activity may otherwise be appropriate.
# Denmark

108 items

        -    Report  		Denmark	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (15-930) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  September 30, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (11-505) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime	  May 5, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (10-201.6) – Instrument Amending the Treaty of June 22, 1972 on Extradition	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (10-201.29) – Instrument as Contemplated by Article 3(3) of the Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance Between the United States and the European Union of June 25, 2003	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (09-915) – Scientific and Technological Agreement	  September 15, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (13149) – Protocol to the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation of October 1, 1951	  December 10, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (08-1001.1) – Agreement on Social Security	  October 1, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Denmark (07-1228) – Protocol Amending the Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 28, 2007 

previous page1…891011next page

Back to Top
HomeGuyana

# Guyana

75 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary General of the Organization of American States Luis Almagro At a Meeting of the Summit Implementation Review Group	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 8, 2022Los Angeles Convention CenterLos Angeles, California 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Guyana	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Guyana National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 26, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Guyana	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Guyana	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Guyana	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Guyana National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 26, 2021 

previous page123456…8next page

Back to Top