alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       State or County
                           Name of Subsidiary                          of Incorporation
                           ------------------                          ----------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
                  Southern Michigan Bank & Trust                       Michigan

                  SMB&T Financial Services, Inc.                       Michigan

                  SMB Mortgage Company                                 Michigan
</TABLE>

Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. is the immediate parent and owns 100% of the
outstanding shares of Southern Michigan Bank & Trust. Southern Michigan Bank &
Trust is the immediate parent and owns 100% of the outstanding shares of SMB&T
Financial Services, Inc. and SMB Mortgage Company.




                                      E-22
§ 6.5 Standards for awards. ( a ) A prevailing applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with the *final* disposition of a proceeding, unless ( 1 ) the position of the agency was substantially justified, or
( 2 ) special circumstances make the award unjust. No presumption arises that the agency's position was not substantially justified simply because the agency did not prevail.
( b ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceeding or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
HomeLibya

# Libya

130 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 12, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 16, 2023	  Vedant PatelMay 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Libya	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO, Ambassador Julianne Smith	  March 31, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs	  March 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint 10-Year Plans for the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  March 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Pursuing Peace Through Partnerships, Local Engagement, and Learning	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Libya	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		$150 Million in New Humanitarian Assistance for the Sahel Region and West and Central Africa	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, and Tunisia	  March 15, 2023 

previous page12345…13next page

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

 11 a.m., Friday September 11, 2009.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

 Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-21163 Filed 8-28-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Chief Accounting Officer of Capital Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date of this certification:





1. The annual report (Amendment #1) of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








CAPITAL GROUP HOLDINGS. INC.

FKA OASIS ONLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.August 30, 2012
/s/ Eric ClickBy:
Eric ClickIts:
Director

Secretary

Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operating Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 169 (Wednesday, September 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory 
Committee.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: September 23, 2009-9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the 
interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the 
meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 
267-8937 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a1d161508131b541e0f141e1f08171b143a1c1b1b541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddad1d2cfd4dc93d9c8d3d9d8cfd0dcd3fddbdcdc93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>. Attendees will have to present 
picture ID at the security desk and be escorted to the Round Room.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 19, 2009.
Barry Scott,
Director, Research & Technology Development.
[FR Doc. E9-21071 Filed 9-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Worldwide directory of national earth-science agencies and related international organizations

By: Wenonah E. Bergquist (compiler)E.J. TinsleyLaura YordyR. L. Miller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir834

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 10.44

TERMINATIONAGREEMENT

Reference is made to (i) theInstallment Note executed as of the 20th day of July 1999 (the“Installment Note”) by Ascent Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation(“AMI” or the “Borrower”) and wholly-owned subsidiary of AscentAssurance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ascent”, formerly known asWestbridge Capital Corp.), and (ii) the Guaranty executed as of the 21st day ofJuly 1999 (as modified and supplemented and in effect on the date hereof, the“Guaranty”) issued by Ascent Funding, Inc. in favor of the Bank.
# C_2005243EN.01000201.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/2

---

Appeal brought on 4 May 2005 by Energy Technologies ET SA against the order made on 28 February 2005 by the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-445/04 between Energy Technologies ET SA and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Aparellaje eléctrico, SL

(Case C-197/05 P)

(2005/C 243/03)

Language of the case: English

An appeal against the order made on 28 February 2005 by the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in case T-445/04 (1) between Energy Technologies ET SA and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Aparellaje eléctrico, SL, was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 4 May 2005 by Energy Technologies ET SA, established in Fribourg (Switzerland), represented by Ms A. Boman.

1

The Appellant

| 1) | claims that the Court annuls the contested decision and remands the case to the Court of First Instance for trial of the trade mark matter. |
| --- | --- |

1)

claims that the Court annuls the contested decision and remands the case to the Court of First Instance for trial of the trade mark matter.

| 2) | requests further respite of six months in order to be able to evaluate the need for further substantiation of this appeal and possibly for submittance of expert opinion. |
| --- | --- |

2)

requests further respite of six months in order to be able to evaluate the need for further substantiation of this appeal and possibly for submittance of expert opinion.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the appealed decision the Court of First Instance dismissed the application on the grounds that Energy Technologies ET SA was not represented by a lawyer pursuant to Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice.

The appellant claims that the Court of First Instance has misinterpreted Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice and that its finding that the appellant was not represented by a lawyer within the terms of that Article is incorrect.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.07.2005, p. 36

1

---
- Office Home
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety, and Security

# Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety, and Security

## 				Our Mission			

					NESS develops U.S. policy related to peaceful nuclear cooperation, nuclear safety, nuclear export controls, and the protection of nuclear materials and facilities, in furtherance of U.S. nuclear nonproliferation goals. The office concentrates on technical aspects of nuclear technology and the dangers of proliferation by consulting multilaterally and bilaterally with other nations to advance U.S. interests, including within International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), and the Zangger Committee.				

Back to Top
#### Max SHINKEWITZ, Appellant, v. Anna SHINKEWITZ, Appellee.

No. 73-1503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 14, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1975.

Norman K. Schwarz, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Milton Ferrell, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the petitioner-husband from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage in which the trial court partitioned the marital residence, granted attorney’s fees to the wife’s counsel and set a supersedeas bond.

Appellant has raised four points on appeal challenging these various actions taken by the trial judge.

We have carefully considered each point in light of the record on appeal, the briefs, and arguments of counsel, and' have determined that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

The record shows that the marriage between the parties, each in their seventies, was of short duration (about four months). In our view, the court did not abuse its discretion in resolving the property rights of the couple or in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee.

Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VICORP
RESTAURANTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF
APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.  THE ITEMS RELATED TO EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO
CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF SFAS NO. 128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE".
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000703799
<NAME> VICORP RESTAURANTS, INC>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,638
<PP&E>                                         282,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,641
<BONDS>                                         22,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           454
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,301
<SALES>                                        161,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,246
<CGS>                                           51,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,003
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,559
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0351 Directorate ID : 2009 - SW - 049 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3, and D; and AS355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S . Operators): 654 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of a tail rotor blade tab, which could result in excessive vibration and loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 100 for rivets $100 for tab Labor per Helicopter ( 1 work- hour x $ 8 5 /workhour for the inspection & riveting) (4 work- hour s x $85/work hour for the replacement) $ 85 $340 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 185 for the inspection & riveting $440 for the tab replacement Total US Fleet Cost $ 120,990 for the inspection & riveting Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Gary

Roach
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25.869-1A**Date:**10/22/2007** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Fire Protection Systems** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  25**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:**AC 25.869-1**Initiating Office:**ANM-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
§ 587.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 587.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 587.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 587.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 587.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
HomeBelize

# Belize

71 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Belizean Foreign Minister Eamon Courtenay Opening Remarks at the Anniversary Ministerial of the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 23, 2023World BankWashington, DC 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Belize	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Belize	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Release of the 2023 Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction	  May 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Belize	  March 20, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Belize (23-103) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions	  January 3, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Former Belizean Minister John Birchman Saldivar for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  November 15, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Belizean Prime Minister Briceño	  September 27, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Belizean Prime Minister John Briceño Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 26, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		Belize Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 21, 2022 

previous page1234…8next page

Back to Top
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report, fy ...[electronic resource].**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:B 95/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000635279
 
September 12, 2019