alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 596.508 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( 1 ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( 2 ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( 3 ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing;
( 4 ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and
( 5 ) The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
( b ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
[87 FR 78481, Dec. 21, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 286 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 286

   To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal 
   economic development assistance if the State or locality provides 
improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within 
                         the State or locality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Banking and Financial Services and, in addition, to the 
  Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit States and localities from receiving certain Federal 
   economic development assistance if the State or locality provides 
improper incentives for location of businesses or organizations within 
                         the State or locality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE.

    No State or political subdivision of a State may be provided 
assistance under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 
of 1974 or the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 if 
such State or political subdivision (or any instrumentality thereof) 
offers, permits, or grants any tax abatement, money payment, or payment 
of property (real or chattel) to any commercial or nonprofit 
organization or governmental entity in order to induce the location, 
retention, or expansion of such organization or entity within the State 
or political subdivision.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR ENTERPRISE ZONES.

    The prohibition under section 1 shall not apply to any abatement or 
payment offered, permitted, or granted under State law in connection 
with any tax enterprise zone established under State law.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2810

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that cafeteria

plans which provide for grandfathered 401(k) plans may also provide

for contributions to section 457 plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that cafeteria plans which provide for grandfathered

401(k) plans may also provide for contributions to section 457 plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF SECTION 457 PLANS BY CAFE4 TERIA PLANS WHICH ALSO PROVIDE FOR

5 401(k) PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 125(d)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to cafe-
2

•HR 2810 IH

1 teria plans) is amended by adding at the end the following

2 new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(D) EXCEPTION FOR SECTION 457 PLANS

4 IF GRANDFATHERED 401(k) PLANS ALSO OF5 FERED.—

6 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A)

7 shall not apply to an eligible deferred com8 pensation plan (as defined in section 457)

9 provided for by a cafeteria plan (deter10 mined without regard to this paragraph), if

11 such cafeteria plan also provides for a

12 grandfathered 401(k) plan.

13 ‘‘(ii) GRANDFATHERED 401(k)

14 PLAN.—For purposes of clause (i), the

15 term ‘grandfathered 401(k) plan’ means a

16 qualified cash or deferred arrangement (as

17 defined in section 401(k)(2)) adopted by a

18 State or local government (or political sub19 division thereof) before May 6, 1986.’’

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 this section shall apply to plan years beginning after De22 cember 31, 1995.

Æ
#### George RICHARDSON v. LOUISIANA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., LTD.

No. 67785.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court. No. 79-7970.

Denied.
HomeAustria

# Austria

99 items

        -    Press Statement  		Austria’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 26, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Peter Harrell,  Senior Director for International Economics and Competitiveness, Ruth Berry,  Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Information and Communications Policy,  and Peter A. Winn,  Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer	  October 7, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Vienna, September 27-29	  September 24, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins to Participate in the IAEA General Conference in Vienna, Austria, September 25-28	  September 24, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Austria	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele J. Sison’s Travel to London and Vienna	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Austria	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele J. Sison’s Travel to Vienna, Rome, and Ljubljana	  June 24, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Austria	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ad Hoc Committee to Elaborate a United Nations Cybercrime Convention Second Negotiating Session in Vienna, Austria	  May 31, 2022 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 1 We address the other argument Barr aza-Lopez raises on appeal in an opinion filed concurrently with this memorandum disposition. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JUAN PEDRO BARRAZA-LOPEZ, Defendant - Appellant. No. 10-50280 D.C. No. 3:04-cr-01962-L-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 3, 2011 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Juan Pedro Barraza-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction on two counts of illegal reentry and one count of escape from federal custody. He also appeals his 100-month sentence. 1 We affirm. 

# FILED
SEP 28 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 1. Barraza-Lopez has waived his claim that 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)’s 70- day indictment-to-trial time limit was violat ed. In the plea ag reement, he agreed not to appeal any rulings other than those the agreement expressly outlined. Barraza-Lopez did not raise his § 3161(c) clai m before the district court, so the plea agreement of course did not list any ruling on this claim among those preserved for appeal. Barraza-Lopez theref ore waived his right to raise it here. See United States v. Bynum , 362 F.3d 574, 583 (9th Cir. 2004). 2. Barraza-Lopez’s 100-month sentence – at the low end of an unchallenged Guidelines range – was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). The district court discussed all of the mitigating evid ence Barraza-Lopez says was improperly discounted and explained why it accorded greater weight to the aggravating evidence. There was no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Burgum , 633 F.3d 810, 813 (9th Cir. 2011) (rejecting a substantive unreasonableness challenge when the district court’s findings were “r ational, clearly explained and closely tied to the factual record”). AFFIRMED.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2015 - 0082 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM233AD

A601 - 0627, R01 --- 2/26/14 A601 - 0627_Appendix 1 --- 9/26/13 A601 - 0627_Appendix 2 --- 9/26/13 A600 - 0763, R01 --- 2/26/14 A600 - 0763 Appendix 1 --- 9/26/13 A600 - 0763 Appendix 2 --- 9/26/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
§ 599.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( a ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 599.201; or
( b ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
# C_2005173EN.01000702.xml

| 13.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz)

(2005/C 173/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3695. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3695. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(ER)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(ER)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

MISSION AREA SUPPLEMENT -

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND 

RESTORATION

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Administration...Office of Emergency Management

# Office of Emergency Management

## 				Our Mission			

					OEM provides planning, training, exercises to ensure preparedness for the Department's leadership and workforce to respond to and recover from all domestic hazards affecting the Department and to ensure the continuation of the Department's mission in conjunction with our partners. OEM aspires for the Department's workforce to be prepared for responding to and recovering from any domestic incident, and for the interagency to recognize the Department as a center of excellence in emergency management and continuity planning.				

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 26, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c., Dublin, Ireland, M&T Bank 
Corporation, and First Empire State Holding Company, all of Buffalo, 
New York, to acquire Provident Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore, 
Maryland, and merge Provident Bankshares Corporation with and into 
First Empire State Holding Company, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Provident Bank of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
    In connection with this application, First Empire State Holding 
Company has applied to become a bank holding company.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 27, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-2015 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 598.406 Provision of services. ( a ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 598.202 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, including by a foreign branch of an entity located in the United States: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of a specially designated narcotics trafficker; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of a specially designated narcotics trafficker.
( b ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to a specially designated narcotics trafficker.
Note 1 to § 598.406 :
*See* §§ 598.507 and 598.513 on licensing policy with regard to the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.
[86 FR 26669, May 17, 2021]
HomeUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs...Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs  Releases

# Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Releases

51 items

        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative’s 10th Anniversary Summit	  Elizabeth M. AllenDecember 4, 2023Bali, Indonesia 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Elizabeth M. Allen Celebrates the Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative’s 10th Anniversary	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Elizabeth M. Allen Launches Inaugural U.S.-ROK Public Diplomacy Dialogue	  December 1, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Allen’s Travel to the Republic of Korea, Indonesia, and Japan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Public Diplomacy – An Approach to Securing High Tech: A Conversation Between Under Secretary Elizabeth M. Allen and Krach Institute CEO Michelle Giuda	  Elizabeth M. AllenNovember 8, 2023Tech Freedom SummitWashington, D.C. 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken Participates in a Memorandum of Understanding Signing Ceremony with the Smithsonian Institution	  October 6, 2023 
        -    		External Links	   
        -    		Expositions	   
        -    		Past U.S. Pavilions	   

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
#### § 576.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures (including those pursuant to statements of licensing policy), and other procedures, see 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
#### § 555.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.
#### § 582.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
April20,2012

Al Armendariz,Ph.D.Regional AdministratorU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 7 5202-27 33Dear Dr. Armendariz:

Pursuant to the requirements in Section 1û7(dXlXA) of tlie Federal Clean Air Act, enclosed is arevised recommendation for designation of areas in Texas with regard to the 2010 NationalAmbient Air Quality Standard for one-hour sulfur dioxide (SO2) of 75 parts per billion (ppb).

The most recent monitoring data show that Jefferson County is now in attainment of the

standard. I am requesting to revise my recommendation to reflect this change.The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) developed the enclosed revision to

the June 20ll Texas recommendation, considering the latest available, certified regulatory

monitoring data for Jefferson County from the 2009 - 2011 period. This revisedrecommenãation reflects the improved air quality in Jefferson County, which has a2009 - 20ll

design value of 68 ppb. In accordance with the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and

Stanãards' Directoi Stephen Page's March 24,2011, SO2 area designatiorrs memorandum, the

commission understands that EPA intends to accept the most recently certified three years

(2009 -2011) of monitoring data as the basis for modifuing previously submitted state designations.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact TCEQ

Chairman Dr. Bryan Shaw at (512)239-5510.

Sincerely,

l(H ?*J

Rick Perry

Governor

RP:trpEnclosure

cc: Bryan V/. Shaw, Ph.D

Posr Omcn Box t2428 AusrN, Tnxes 7871,1 (512)463-2000 (Yotcr)/DttL 7-1,-1, ron R¡r-ev Ssnucss

Vlsrr ww.Tnr¡.sOx¡¡qr.co¡r.t tr* Orncnr'W¡¡ Srrs or trs SrATE or Trx,ts
County DesignValue

Design Value

Jefferson

Gregg

Ellis

Harris

Galveston

Nueces

Kaufman

El Paso

Dallas

McLennan

77

66

5756

47

z8

74

11

9

68

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

6 NA

* 2010 design values are calculated using zooB through zoro certified monitoring data.** 2011 design vaiues are calculated using zoog through zorr certified monitoring data. Only

Jefferson County data have been certified by the TCEQ for zou on an expedited basis.

NA = not available
# C_2005171EN.01000401.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 12 May 2005

in Case C-99/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/80/EC - Failure to transpose)

(2005/C 171/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-99/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and R. Amorosi) v Italian Republic (Agents: I.M. Braguglia assisted by G. Fiengo) — Action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 26 February 2004 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann and E. Juhász, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 May 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.04.2004

1

---