alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Ecuador

128 items

        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Ecuador	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Ecuador	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ecuador: Travel Advisory Raised to Level 3 – Reconsider Travel	  June 22, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Additional $314 Million for U.S. Humanitarian Response to the Venezuela Regional Crisis	  June 10, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Secretary General of the Organization of American States Luis Almagro At a Meeting of the Summit Implementation Review Group	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 8, 2022Los Angeles Convention CenterLos Angeles, California 
        -    Press Statement  		World Ocean Day  	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		The United States, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Panama Sign a Memorandum of Understanding in Support of the Eastern Tropical Pacific Marine Corridor (CMAR)	  June 7, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Ecuador	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 

previous page1…45678…13next page

Back to Top
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 36-1H**Date:**11/15/2001** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Noise Levels for U.S. Certificated and Foreign Aircraft ** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  36**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:**AC 36-1G**Initiating Office:**AEE-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:Appendix 1,  AIRCRAFT NOISE DATA FOR UNITED STATES CERTIFICATED TURBOJET POWERED AIRPLANES, updated March 2, 2010.Appendix 8 – U.S. Certificated Propeller Driven Small Airplanes (14 CFR Part 36, Appendix G), updated August 31, 2009

FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
EXHIBIT
10.1b




PROXY
 
 
 WHEREAS, Chi Lin Technology Co., Ltd.
("Chi Lin"), an entity of the Republic of China (Taiwan), doing business at No.
18, Sheng Li 1st Street, Jen Te Hsiang, Tainan County 71758, Taiwan, Republic of
China, is the owner of 6,043,704 shares (the "InMedica Shares") of restricted
common stock of InMedica Development Corporation, a Utah corporation
("InMedica"); and
 
 WHEREAS, Larry Clark and Richard
Bruggeman, former officers of InMedica, desire to acquire an irrevocable proxy
to be able to vote the InMedica Shares owned by Chi Lin in any vote or consent
of InMedica shareholders; and
 
 THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged:
 
 Chi Lin hereby appoints Larry Clark and
Richard Bruggeman, and any successors of them, with full power of substitution,
its proxy to vote the InMedica Shares for a period commencing with the date
hereof through and including January 8, 2010, at any shareholders' meeting or
any consent resolution of the shareholders of InMedica, without restriction
except any vote by the proxies must be unanimous. This Proxy is coupled with an
interest in that Clark and Bruggeman are creditors of InMedica and continue to
forebear collection of amounts owing to them based on, among other things, this
Proxy being granted to enhance their security for debts due to
them.  Mr. Clark and Bruggeman agree that they will be responsible to
report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission any change in their
beneficial ownership in InMedica caused by this Proxy, pursuant to the
appropriate forms under Section 16A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the Williams Act of the federal securities laws.
 
 Dated the 10th day of September,
2009.
 CHI
      LIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD/s/ Yeou-Geng HsuYeou-Geng Hsu, President
#### § 542.319 Petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin.

The term *petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin* means petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin pursuant to Country of Origin definitions of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014. Redesignated at 89 FR 48317, June 6, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20922]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 24, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Max Bancorp, LLC, New York, New York; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring a majority of the voting shares of Sandhills 
Holding Company, Inc. and indirectly, Sandhills Bank, both of North 
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offerbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Manhattan Banking Corporation, Manhattan, Kansas; to retain 5.85 
percent of the voting shares of Sonoran Bank, N.A., Phoenix, Arizona.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 26, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-20922 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

ARAYA HENOK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-1114 (PLF)

)

GLADYS KESSLER, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 3] filed by the District of 

Columbia is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 4] filed by the 

District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint 

[Dkt. No. 10] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final 

appealable Order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/___________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: January 29, 2015 United States District Judge
6/4/13 Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 1/2

A to Z Index | FAQs | About BLS | Contact Us Subscribe to E-mail Updates

Follow Us | What's New | Release Calendar | Site Map

Search BLS.gov

Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject FONT SIZE:

Change Output Options: From: 2003 To: 2013

include graphs

Data extracted on: June 4, 2013 (1:56:07 PM)

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

SeriesId: LNS14000000

SeasonallyAdjusted

Seriestitle: (Seas)UnemploymentRate

Laborforce status: Unemploymentrate

Type ofdata: Percentorrate

Age: 16yearsandover

Download:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7

2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4

2005 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9

2006 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4

2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.0

2008 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.8 7.3

2009 7.8 8.3 8.7 9.0 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.8 10.0 9.9 9.9

2010 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.6 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.8 9.3

2011 9.1 9.0 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.9 8.6 8.5

2012 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.8

2013 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.5

TOOLS

Areas at a Glance

Industries at a Glance

Economic Releases

Databases & Tables

CALCULATORS

Inflation

Location Quotient

Injury And Illness

HELP

Help & Tutorials

FAQs

Glossary

About BLS

INFO

What's New

Careers @ BLS

Find It! DOL

Join our Mailing Lists

RESOURCES

Inspector General (OIG)

Budget and Performance

No Fear Act

USA.gov

Home Subject Areas Databases & Tools Publications Economic Releases Beta
6/4/13 Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 2/2

Freedom of Information Act | Privacy & Security Statement | Disclaimers | Customer Survey | Important Web Site Notices

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20212-0001

www.bls.gov | Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 | TDD: 1-800-877-8339 | Contact Us

Maps Contact Us Linking & Copyright Info Benefits.gov

Disability.gov
40539.

#### FARR v. COLLINS.

Decided January 28, 1964.

*38*Jim Hudson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Telford, Wayne & Greer, Jeff C. Wayne, Dent Bostick, Tifton S. Greer,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. We must agree with the trial judge that as to special grounds 4 and 5 of the amended motion error requiring a new trial is shown. Nowhere in his answer, nor does it appear elsewhere in the record, did the defendant *contend*that there was any negligence on his part. Rather, his contention was to the contrary. He clearly and explicitly denied all acts of negligence charged against him and then asserted that plaintiff’s injuries resulted from his own failure to exercise ordinary care for his own safety—or, to state it differently, from his own negligence.1 This we regard as a material mis*39statement of the defendant’s contentions. Obviously the jury may very well have concluded from these portions of the charge that the defendant conceded or admitted some negligence on his part when he did no such thing, and this may have influenced the jury in returning an adverse verdict. “Where the court, in charging the jury as to the respective contentions of the parties, not only failed to correctly present those of the losing party, but practically instructed the jury that he admitted the contention of the opposite party concerning one of the vital issues in the case, a new trial is demanded.” *Hightower v. Ansley,*126 Ga. 8 (6) (54 SE 939, 7 AC 927); *City of Decatur v. Robertson,*85 Ga. App. 747, 749 (70 SE2d 135). “The defendant was entitled to have the case tried upon the defenses which it elected to assert, and should not have been placed in the attitude of making a further issue . . . The fact that the defendant was thus placed in a false and losing position as to one issue tended to discredit its position as to other issues, and might have been the deciding factor in the deliberations of the jury.” *First Nat. Bank v. Langston,*44 Ga. App. 465, 467 (161 SE 637); *McJenkins Ins. &c. Co. v. Thompson,*79 Ga. App. 473, 475 (54 SE2d 336).

If these portions of the charge had been given as legal principles, and not as contentions of the defendant a different conclusion would be reached under the facts proven. There was *some*evidence from which the jury might have concluded that the defendant was to some degree or in some respect negligent.

2. We have carefully examined the remaining seven special grounds of the amended motion but find them all to have been without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

1

The defense pleaded “contributory negligence” as contained in the first portion of *Code*§ 105-603 rather than the "comparative negligence” rules set out in the last portion of that Code section. See the discussion in Judge Hall’s special concurrence at pages 441-442 in *Kreiss v. Allatoona Landing, Inc.,*108 Ga. App. 427 (133 SE2d 602); also Hilkey, *Actions for Wrongful Death in Georgia,*22 GBJ 459, at pp. 461, 462; Hilkey, *Comparative Negligence in Georgia,*8 GBJ 51.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2753

To allow the marketing of the Sensor Pad, a medical device to aid in

breast self-examination.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To allow the marketing of the Sensor Pad, a medical device

to aid in breast self-examination.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SENSOR PAD.

4 The Sensor Pad, a medical device to aid in breast

5 self-examination, shall be considered a device for which a

6 report under section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug,

7 and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) has been accepted

8 by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and which
2

HR 2753 IH

1 has been approved under subchapter A of chapter V of

2 such Act.

Æ
§ 11.22 Which applicable clinical trials must be registered? ( a ) *General specification.* ( 1 ) Any applicable clinical trial that is initiated after September 27, 2007, must be registered.
( 2 ) Any applicable clinical trial that is initiated on or before September 27, 2007, and is ongoing on December 26, 2007, must be registered.
( 3 ) *Determining the date of initiation for an applicable clinical trial.* An applicable clinical trial, other than a pediatric postmarket surveillance of a device product that is not a clinical trial, is considered to be initiated on the date on which the first human subject is enrolled. A pediatric postmarket surveillance of a device product that is not a clinical trial is considered to be initiated on the date on which FDA approves the plan for conducting the surveillance.
( b ) *Determination of applicable clinical trial for a clinical trial or study initiated on or after January 18, 2017.* A clinical trial or study that, at any point in time, meets the conditions listed in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section will be considered to meet the definition of an applicable clinical trial. ( 1 ) *Applicable device clinical trial.* A clinical trial or study that meets the conditions listed in either paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section is an applicable device clinical trial: ( i ) The study is a pediatric postmarket surveillance of a device product as required by FDA under section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 3601).
( ii ) The study is a clinical trial with one or more arms that meets all of the following criteria: ( A ) Study Type is interventional;
( B ) Primary Purpose of the clinical trial is other than a feasibility study;
( C ) The clinical trial Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product; and
( D ) One or more of the following applies: ( 1 ) At least one Facility Location is within the United States or one of its territories,
( 2 ) A device product under investigation is a Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S. or one of its territories for study in another country, or
( 3 ) The clinical trial has a U.S. Food and Drug Administration IDE Number.
( 2 ) *Applicable drug clinical trial.* A clinical trial with one or more arms that meets the following conditions is an applicable drug clinical trial: ( i ) Study Type is interventional;
( ii ) Study Phase is other than phase 1;
( iii ) The clinical trial Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product; and
( iv ) One or more of the following applies: ( A ) At least one Facility Location for the clinical trial is within the United States or one of its territories,
( B ) A drug product (including a biological product) under investigation is a Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S. or one of its territories for study in another country, or
( C ) The clinical trial has a U.S. Food and Drug Administration IND Number.
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeMultilateral Trade Affairs...Conflict Diamonds and the Kimberley Process

# 									Conflict Diamonds and the Kimberley Process							

Division for Trade Policy and Negotiations

The Kimberley Process (KP) is an international, multi-stakeholder trade regime created in 2003 to increase transparency and oversight in the diamond supply chain in order to eliminate trade in conflict diamonds, defined as rough diamonds sold by rebel groups or their allies to fund conflict against legitimate governments. The KP facilitates legitimate trade in rough diamonds among participating countries by mandating domestic implementation of a certification scheme that makes the trade more transparent and secure, and prohibits trade with non-participants.  Fifty-nine participants representing 85 countries, including the United States and the EU (which represents EU member states) participate in the KP. Industry and civil society participate as observers. The KP certification scheme requires rough diamonds to be shipped in tamper-proof containers and exported with a Kimberley Process Certificate that certifies that the rough diamonds have not benefited rebel movements.

The State Department’s Office of Multilateral Trade Affairs in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs coordinates U.S. Government implementation of the Kimberley Process pursuant to the Clean Diamond Trade Act of 2003, represents the United States in annual Kimberley Process meetings, and oversees the U.S. Kimberley Process Authority, a non-profit entity that issues Kimberley Process Certificates for U.S. exporters.

For further information, contact the U.S. State Department’s Senior Advisor on Conflict Minerals & U.S. Kimberley Process Representative at **USKimberleyProcess@state.gov**.

To obtain a Kimberley Process Certificate or to learn about becoming a licensee, please contact the U.S. Kimberley Process Authority**:****https://uskpa.org****.**

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsConflict DiamondsConflict PreventionDivision for Trade Policy and NegotiationsTrade Policy

## Related Articles

-  											 													Conflict Diamonds and the Kimberley Process – Reports and Other Documents			
Read more
 
-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 583.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 583.507(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 583.201 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 583.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (a) authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 583.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Records.* Consistent with § 501.601 of this chapter, U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must retain for five years from the date of the relevant payment a record that specifies the following for each payment: ( 1 ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( 2 ) If applicable: ( i ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( ii ) A general description of the services provided; and
( iii ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 3 ) These records must be furnished to OFAC on demand consistent with § 501.602 of this chapter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0125

ROBERT G. HORNBACK,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

E

MAR 10 2020

Bowen Grez.-riwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

Stato of Montana Chad Wright, Appellate Defender, has petitioned for an out-of-time appeal from the

Order Denying Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea entered September 23, 2019, by

the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, in Cause No. DV 18-02. The

Attorney General's Office does not oppose this petition.

Hornback, representing himself, filed a petition for habeas corpus, which became

Cause No. DV 18-02 in the District Court. Hornback' s petition challenged his conviction

and sentence as a persistent felony offender in Cause No. DC 87-72. The District Court

granted Hornback's petition and set a resentencing hearing.

Hornback obtained appointed counsel and moved to withdraw his guilty plea he had

entered in DC 87-72. The District Court denied the rnotion on September 23 2019, but

entered the denial order in DV 18-02. The court then held the resentencing hearing on

December 3, 2019, and entered its amended sentence in both DC 87-72 and DV 18-02.

On January 3, 2020, Hornback timely filed a notice of appeal from DC 87-72.

He now seeks leave under M. R. App. P. 4(5) to file an out-of-time appeal from DV 18-02

because he alleges the cases are interconnected and the December 3, 2019 resentencing order

affects both. Wright asserts that if the Court grants this petition, Hornback will consolidate

DC 87-72 and DV 18-02 into one case on appeal.

03/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0125

We grant out-of-time appeals under M. R. App. P. 4(6) when an appellant establishes

the existence of "extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage of justice."

If this Court were to reject Hornback's untimely notice of appeal in this case, the

interconnected nature of these matters could adversely affect his rights as to the timely filed'

appeal.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for an out-of-time appeal is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall have thirty days from the date of

this Order within which to prepare, file, and serve a Notice of Appeal and a Request for

Transcripts in compliance with the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

41—

DATED this I b day of March, 2020.

2