alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0593 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 238

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs ) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include spec ific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES NO Explanation:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Joint Open Meeting with the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to seek input from the public on 
harmonization of market regulation on September 2, 2009 from 9 a.m. 
until 5 p.m. at the CFTC and on September 3, 2009 from 9 a.m. until 
12:30 p.m. at the SEC.
    The Joint Open Meeting will take place on September 2, 2009 at the 
CFTC's headquarters at Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000), Washington, DC 20581 and on 
September 3, 2009 at the SEC's headquarters at 100 F Street, NE., 
Auditorium (Room L-002), Washington, DC 20549. The Joint Open Meeting 
will be open to the public with seating on a first-come, first-served 
basis. Visitors will be subject to security checks.
    Discussion topics at the Joint Open Meeting will include the 
regulation of exchanges and markets; the regulation of intermediaries; 
the regulation of clearance and settlement; enforcement; and the 
regulation of investment funds. For further information, please 
contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 25, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20843 Filed 8-25-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### Jerry Douglas POWE, Sr. v. Kathy Culp POWE.

No. 65241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 31, 1979.

In re Kathy Culp Powe, applying for writs of certiorari. Parish of Lasalle. No. 16,096.

Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to fix alimony pendente lite in accordance with Act No. 72 of 1979 amending La. Civil Code art. 148. Appeal No. 65,394 dismissed as moot.
# Sudan

248 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 15, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 15, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 1, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 1, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 19, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 19, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL: Supporting Transparency and Accountability in Sudan	  February 16, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Sudan (21-209) – Claims Settlement Agreement	  February 9, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Sudanese PM Hamdok	  February 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 8, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 8, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Sudan (20-1219) – Amendment of Claims and Dispute Resolution Agreement, with Annex	  December 19, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Sudan (20-1021) – Claims and Dispute Resolution Agreement	  October 21, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Sudan	  September 8, 2020 

previous page1…2122232425next page

Back to Top
#### § 700.2 Applicability.

The regulations in this part apply to the buildings and surrounding property of the FLETC, Glynco, Georgia; Artesia, New Mexico; FLECT's Washington Office; any other temporary site FLETC may occupy; and to all persons entering such buildings or property.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 4 , 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00083

- CR

Dustin Ray Randig, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODW IN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appellant is indigent a nd u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### Martha Edwards *v.*F. W. Woolworth Company.

Maltbie, C. J., Avery, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued June 3

decided July 1, 1942.

*Theodore I. Koskoff,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*George N. Foster,*with whom was *C. David Munich,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries suffered when she slipped and fell in a store of the defendant. She recovered a verdict which the trial court set aside, and from that ruling she has appealed. In the store was a lunch counter and also a counter where frankfurters were sold. When the plaintiff entered about noon there was a crowd about the lunch counter. The floor was littered with broken cookies, a piece of bread, a broken, dirty roll and the like. She turned to enter an aisle of the store, and when she was about five feet from the place where the frankfurters were sold, she slipped and fell. After falling she looked around and saw a dry, dirty frankfurter skin on the floor which she claimed caused her fall. There was no evidence as to the length of time the skin had been on the floor, nor any evidence that anything else on it would make it slippery. We *246agree with the trial court that the jury could not reasonably have concluded that the skin had been on the floor in a position to cause danger to customers a sufficient length of time so that the defendant should in the exercise of a reasonable inspection have discovered it. *Mascoela*v. *Wise, Smith & Co.,*120 Conn. 699, 181 Atl. 629; *O’Brien*v. *H. L. Green Co.,*128 Conn. 68, 20 Atl. (2d) 411.

There is no error.
§ 82.1 Prohibitions. Except as specifically authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury (or designee) or as otherwise provided in this part, no person shall export, melt, or treat: ( a ) Any 5-cent coin of the United States; or
( b ) Any one-cent coin of the United States.
No. 99-8835.

#### Johnson *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-5878.

#### Henry *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### The HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. S. I. GOLDMAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, INC., et al., and Inland Construction Company of Florida, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 74-521.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
693 A.2d 195

#### In the Matter of Ronald John WOROBEY.

No. 315 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 24, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on March 20, 1997, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Ronald John Worobey to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

*12ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Ronald John Worobey is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
----

NOTICE

On 11 August 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 196 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ will be published.

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/.........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000703645
<NAME> SPECIALTY CHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           3,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,870,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,520,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,610,417
<PP&E>                                      18,277,245
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,666,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,169,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,811,205
<BONDS>                                     16,296,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       394,777
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,666,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,169,432
<SALES>                                     35,557,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,557,165
<CGS>                                       29,452,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,452,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,656,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,435,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,435,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,435,136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

September 22, 2006

Mr. Wayne Clawater

Cruse, Scott, Henderson & Allen, L.L.P.

2777 Allen Parkway, 7th Floor

Houston, TX 77019

Mr. Steven B. Thorpe

Thorpe, Hatcher & Washington, LLP

2929 Carlisle, Suite 250

Dallas, TX 75204

RE:Case Number:  05-1018

Court of Appeals Number:  12-04-00314-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002-272-A

Style:ROBERT W. CARY, M.D.

v.

MITCH ALFORD

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion/s and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-1018Page 1**
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO BARRERA, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00117-CR

Appeal from the

244th District Court

of Ector County, Texas 

(TC# C-19-1105-CR)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Access to the Appellate Record.

Therefore, this Court is hereby providing a hard copy of the appellate record, which consists of 1 

volume of the Clerk’s Record, 1 volume of the Supplemental Clerk’s Record and 13 volumes of 

the Reporter’s Record, via U. S. mail, to the Warden of the Ector County Jail, 2500 US-385, 

Odessa, TX 79766, for use by the Appellant Armanda Barrera, Jr., (SO# 78031). The Warden or 

designated custodian of records shall make this record available to the appellant for purposes of 

preparing his appellate brief. Appellant’s Pro Se brief shall be due in this office on or before 

September 17, 2020. The hard copy of this record does not need to be returned to this 

Court. Further, please note that copies of the exhibits are not provided and only a copy of the 

Index (Volume 14 of 14 of the Reporter’s Record) has been provided. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 090206144-9697-02]
RIN 0648-XQ95


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Temporary rule; inseason quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  NMFS announces that the Commonwealth of Virginia is 
transferring commercial bluefish quota to the State of New York from 
its 2009 quota. By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas and announces 
the revised commercial quota for New York and Virginia.

DATES:  Effective August 26, 2009 through December 31, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Bland, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9257.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state is 
described in Sec.  648.160.
    Two or more states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence 
of the Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), 
can transfer or combine bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  
648.160(f). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    Virginia has agreed to transfer 150,000 lb (68,039 kg) of its 2009 
commercial quota to New York. The Regional Administrator has determined 
that the criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) have been met. The 
revised bluefish quotas for calendar year 2009 are: New York, 1,126,384 
lb (510,919 kg); and Virginia, 1,005,945 lb (456,289 kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-20930 Filed 8-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
§ 585.506 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 585.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 585.507, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 585.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 585.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 585.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 585.506 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
§ 900.2 Definitions and construction. ( a ) For the purposes of the standards in this chapter, the terms “claim” and “debt” are synonymous and interchangeable. They refer to an amount of money, funds, or property that has been determined by an agency official to be due the United States from any person, organization, or entity, except another Federal agency. For the purposes of administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, the terms “claim” and “debt” include an amount of money, funds, or property owed by a person to a State (including past-due support being enforced by a State), the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
( b ) A debt is “delinquent” if it has not been paid by the date specified in the agency's initial written demand for payment or applicable agreement or instrument (including a post-delinquency payment agreement), unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made.
( c ) In parts 900-904 of this chapter, words in the plural form shall include the singular and vice versa, and words signifying the masculine gender shall include the feminine and vice versa. The terms “includes” and “including” do not exclude matters not listed but do include matters that are in the same general class.
( d ) Recoupment is a special method for adjusting debts arising under the same transaction or occurrence. For example, obligations arising under the same contract generally are subject to recoupment.
( e ) For purposes of the standards in this chapter, unless otherwise stated, “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate.
HomeAustria

# Austria

97 items

        -    TIAS  		Austria (10-201.24) – Protocol to the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (04-0801) – Agreement to Supplement the ERP-Counterpart-Settlement Agreement of March 29, 1961	  August 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (13143) – Agreement Relating the the Agreement Concerning the Austrian Fund “Reconciliation, Peace and Cooperation”	  June 6, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (13122) – Agreement Concerning the Austrian Fund “Reconciliation, Peace and Cooperation”	  December 1, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (12916) – Treaty on Extradition	  January 1, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (98-801) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  August 1, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Austria (98-201) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  February 1, 1998 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
#### § 137.376 Are design and construction projects performed by Self-Governance Tribes under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8] subject to Federal metric requirements?

No, however, the Self-Governance Tribe and the Secretary may negotiate the use of Federal metric requirements in the construction project agreement when the Self-Governance Tribe will design and/or construct an IHS facility that the Secretary will own and operate.