alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeU.S. Military–Marine Security Guard...Charles Wayne Turberville

# 									Charles Wayne Turberville							

DS Memorial

September 26, 1971

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**U.S. Military—Marine Security Guard****Year of Death: 1971**

Sgt. Charles Wayne Turberville, Marine Security Guard, died on September 26, 1971, in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. He was killed in a Khmer Rouge guerrilla rocket and mortar attack. His hometown is Franklin, Alabama.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

CambodiaDS Military Marine Security

Back to Top
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in each  of the  Registration
Statements of Centennial  Bancorp's  Incentive Stock Option Plan on Form S-8 and
Centennial Bancorp's  Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan on Form S-8 of our
report  dated  February  1, 1996,  on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements of Centennial  Bancorp and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1995 and
1994,  and for each of the three years in the period  ended  December  31, 1995,
which report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.




Eugene, Oregon
March 27, 1996
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 98-60048 Summary Calendar

__________________ PEDRO CRUZ PAXTOR, Petitioner,
versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70 661 135

- - - - - - - - - - - March 3, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pedro Cruz Paxtor petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum and for withholding of deportation. He argues that the Board erred in finding that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum or for withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the decision of theNo. 98-60048 -2- Board is supported by substantial evidence. See CarbajalGonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
ACTION IN MANDAMUS NOT APPEALABLE.

Court of Appeals for Butler County.

#### State, ex rel Welch, v. Deneen, Director of Public Safety, etc.

Decided, November 22, 1915.

*Jurisdiction on Appeal*— Not *Defeated hy Failure to Note Filing of Appeal Bond on Appearance Docket*— Proceedings *in Mandamus May he Reviewed on Error Only.*

1. The notation of the filing of an appeal bond on the appearance docket •is not jurisdictional, and when an appeal bond is given within the statutory period a failure to make a notation thereof on the appearance docket at the time it is given does not affect the appeal.

2. The amendment of the Constitution of Ohio, providing for the organization and jurisdiction of the court of appeals, has excluded a statutory proceeding such as mandamus from the cases which can be reviewed in the court of appeals on appeal, and when such review is desired it must be had by error proceedings.

*Clinton Egbert,*for plaintiff.

*B. F. Primmer,*contra.

Jones (Oliver B.), J.

This ease is heard on a motion to dismiss the appeal. Two grounds are urged: the first, that the judgment having been entered June 29, 1915, and the appeal bond filed September 29, 1915, the said bond was filed more than thirty days after the judgment was entered, and Section 12226, General Code, was. not complied with and the appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

The transcript filed with the papers herein -shows that the appeal bond was given June 30, 1915, and then approved by the clerk in accordance with the statute, but it appears that the clerk failed to note the giving of this bond upon the appearance docket or mark it as having -been filed until September 29, 1915. The jurisdictional requirement of Section 12226 is that *544the undertaking should be given, and that appears to have been done in this case. Of course it should be noted upon the appearance docket at the same time it is given, but such notation does not appear to be jurisdictional.

The second ground urged for dismissal is that under the terms of Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution as amended, this case is not appealable, as it is not equitable in its nature and is not a chancery case.

Prior to the amendment of the Constitution cases in mandamus were appealable to the circuit court. *(Dutlon*v. *Village of Hanover, 42*Ohio St., 215, and *State, ex rel,*v. *Philbrick,*69 Ohio St., 283.) The statute would still seem to permit such an appeal, if it alone were to be considered; but the amendment to the Constitution providing for the organization and jurisdiction of the court of appeals has excluded a statutory proceeding such as mandamus from the cases which can be reviewed in the court of appeals, and such review when desired must therefore be had by error proceedings.

The motion to dismiss will be granted.

Jones (E. H.), J., and Gorman, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20773]



[[Page 44373]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Epidemiology, Prevention and 
Behavior Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: October 28-29, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office 
of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 2121, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b070c1e05110e190a2b060a020745050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0aca7b5aebaa5b2a180ada1a9aceeaea9a8eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: August 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20773 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23


CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS

       We have issued our reports dated January 9, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated  financial  statements  included  in  the  2001  Annual  Report  of
Harleysville National Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Harleysville National Corporation on Form S-8
(File No. 33-57790), effective October 1,1993, File No. 33-17813), effective
December 16, 1996, File No. 333-79972, effective June 4, 1999 and File No. 333-
79973, effective June 4, 1999).



/s/  GRANT  THORNTON  LLP


Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
March  25,  2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BEAR STERNS ASSET BACKED 

SECURITIES I TRUST 2006-IM1, ASSET 

BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-

IM1, U.S. BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE,

Respondents

v.

JOSEPH C. LIKENS AND PATRICIA L. 

LIKENS,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 117 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 16, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00109

- CR

IN RE Samuel MIRELES

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On February 22, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on March 16, 2022

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of March, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- CR

- 10686 , styled State v. Mireles , pending in the 186th Judicial District

Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 5 8 0 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
.
J E R R Y C H A N C E ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 5 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 8 9 7

- 2

B e f o r e J O L L Y , O W E N , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t J e r r y C h a n c e h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f

i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. C h a n c e h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. T h e r e c o r d i s i n s u f f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w

c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e o f C h a n c e ’ s c l a i m o f i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l ;

s u c h a c l a i m g e n e r a l l y “ c a n n o t b e r e s o l v e d o n d i r e c t a p p e a l w h e n t h e c l a i m h a s

n o t b e e n r a i s e d b e f

o r e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t s i n c e n o o p p o r t u n i t y e x i s t e d t o d e v e l o p U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 19 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40580 Document: 00511450181 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 5 8 0

t h e r e c o r d o n t h e m e r i t s o f t h e a l l e g a t i o n s
. ” U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. C a n t w e l l , 4 7 0 F

. 3 d
1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 ) ( i n t e r n a l q u o t a t i o n m a r k s a n d c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d
t h e r e i n , a s w e l l a s C h a n c e ’ s r e s p o n s e
. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t
t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e

m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-40580 Document: 00511450181 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 February 25, 2010
    /s / Thomas J. NeriThomas J. Neri 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Lawson Products, Inc.
(principal executive officer)/s/ Ronald J. KnutsonRonald J. KnutsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Lawson Products, Inc.
(principal financial and accounting officer)
HomeIraq

# Iraq

416 items

        -    		Jason Edward  Obert	  April 21, 2005 
        -    		Steven Matthew  McGovern	  April 21, 2005 
        -    		Curtis Lee  Hundley	  April 21, 2005 
        -    		Robert Jason  Gore	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		David Michael Patterson	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		Jason Edward Obert	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		Luke Adam Petrik	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		Steven Matthew McGovern	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		Curtis Lee Hundley	  April 21, 2005 
        -    DS Memorial  		Robert Jason Gore	  April 21, 2005 

previous page1…373839404142next page

Back to Top
#### § 553.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 553.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 553.302, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Peter Chuchelow.

Maltbie, C. J., Avery, Brown, Jennings and Ells, Js.

Argued October 8

decided November 7, 1941.

*Harry M. Albert,*with whom, on the brief, was *Michael V. Blansfield,*for the appellant (defendant).

*William B. FitzGerald,*state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was *Walter W. Smyth,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Per Curiam.

After the conviction of the defendant of rape in a trial to the court, the trial judge, over the objection of the defendant, took judicial notice of the fact that the latter had been previously convicted of indecent assault in the same court, had appealed to this court, and that the appeal had not been decided. The court, in making this ruling, stated that the existence of the appealed conviction would not influence its disposition of the case. This limitation was unnecessary. The judgment was not vacated *324by *the*appeal. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 1464e (b); *Deposit Bank*v. *Frankfort,*191 U. S. 499, 511, 24 Sup. Ct. 154; *Shaffer*v. *State,*124 Neb. 7, 10, 244 N. W. 921; *People*v. *Morlock,*234 Mich. 683, 685, 209 N. W. 110. See also, for an extensive discussion of the wide field open to the trial judge in obtaining information, after conviction, relevant to mitigation or aggravation of the seriousness of the offense, *People*v. *Popescue,*345 Ill. 142, 177 N. E. 739, 77 A. L. R. 1199. In the case of *State*v. *Adcock,*194 S. C. 234, 9 S. E. (2d) 730, cited in note, 134 A. L. R. 1268, and relied on by the defendant, the other charges referred to at the time of sentence had not even been tried but it was held that, as the appellant’s counsel had himself first commented on the facts involved in them and so had opened the door to the statements by the prosecutor, the trial court had the right to take them into consideration in imposing sentence.

The defendant also claims that the penalty imposed, not less than nine nor more than fifteen years in state’s prison, was excessive. The term imposed being within the limits fixed by General Statutes, § 6240 (thirty years), this contention “is simply an appeal for clemency made to a court which has no discretionary jurisdiction in the matter.” *State*v. *Levy,*103 Conn. 138, 148, 130 Atl. 96. Furthermore, it appears to be fully justified by the facts found. *State*v. *Torkomian,*113 Conn. 785, 786, 156 Atl. 860.

There is no error.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00783-CV

Kyle Jason McCarrell, Appellant

v.

Dunham & Jones Attorneys at Law P.C. and James Erickson, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-GN-19-006982, MR. WILLIAM C. KIRKENDALL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Kyle Jason McCarrell filed his notice of appeal on October 31, 2019. 

The reporter’s record was due on December 27, 2019. On January 2, 2020, this Court sent court 

reporter Ms. Leah Hayes notice that the reporter’s record was overdue and asked her to send this 

Court a written explanation for the delay and an estimate of when the record would be complete.

We requested that a response be filed no later than January 13, 2020. To date, she has not 

tendered the record or a response.

We therefore order Hayes to file the reporter’s record in this cause no later than

February 18, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a). Failure to file the record will result in Hayes

being called before the Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this 

order.

It is ordered on February 7, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MARCUS EDMUND SEAY, ) DOC #T01508, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4635 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

STANLEY TARRAND,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4400

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 10, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Sumter County,

William H. Hallman, III, Judge.

Stanley Tarrand, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Tarrand appeals an order denying his successive motion for 

postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We 

affirm. 

Tarrand contends that his fifty-one-year sentence, agreed to as part of a plea 

agreement, for second-degree murder, committed in 1994 when he was fifteen years old,
2

is a de facto life sentence that does not provide a meaningful opportunity for relief. 

Tarrand argues that his sentence is unconstitutional under the holdings of Miller v. 

Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and seeks 

resentencing pursuant to section 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2015). The trial court 

denied Tarrand’s motion, holding that he “is eligible for early release,” and “has failed to 

show that his sentence exceeds his life expectancy and is thus a de facto life sentence.” 

Because Tarrand committed his crime in 1994, he is, as the trial court correctly found, 

eligible for early release, due to his potential to accrue significant gain time.1 See §

921.001(10)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1994). Thus, because he has a meaningful opportunity for 

early release, we affirm the trial court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

 

1 Tarrand will be sixty-six years old if he serves one hundred percent of his 

sentence. However, because he is eligible for early release, his tentative release date is 

in 2019 when he will be forty-one-years old. Accordingly, we do not address whether 

Tarrand’s sentence is a de facto life sentence.
#### § 594.507 Authorization of emergency medical services.

The provision of nonscheduled emergency medical services in the United States to persons whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201(a) is authorized, provided that all receipt of payment for such services must be specifically licensed.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128386 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128386 COA: 249895 Wayne CC: 03-003696-01 CARL JAMES TRAMMELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk