system could have been installed at an estimated
cost of $1 million with annual treatment costs of
$1.8 million, the total cost (based on 20 years of
operation) of which would have been
approximately $37.9 million. Use of the
innovative barrier system technology thus
results in an estimated cost savings of over $30
million over 20 years.

Case Study 2: MMTP - Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbon (TPH) Measurement
Technologies

As part of the MMT Program,
demonstrations were conducted on several
innovative field measurement devices for total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil.
Specifically, seven TPH measurement
technologies were demonstrated at the Navy
Base Ventura County site in Port Hueneme,
California. The primary purpose of the
demonstrations was to evaluate the innovative
field measurement devices for TPH in soil based
on comparison of their performance and cost to
those of a conventional, off-site laboratory
analytical method. The following seven field
measurement devices were demonstrated:

* CHEMetrics, Inc., RemediAidTM Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Starter Kit

* Wilks Enterprise, Inc., Infracal® TOG/TPH
Analyzer, Models CVH and HATR-T

* Horiba Instruments, Incorporated, OCMA-350
Oil Content Analyzer

*Dexsil Corporation PetroFLAGTM
Hydrocarbon Test Kit for Soil

+ Environmental Systems Corporation
Synchronous Scanning Luminoscope

* SiteLAB® Corporation Analytical ‘Test. Kit
UVE-3100A :

Strategic Diagnostics, Inc., EnSys Petro Test
System .

To address the demonstration objectives,
both environmental and performance evaluation
(PE) samples were analyzed during the
demonstration. The samples were collected
from five areas located in three regions of the
United States that were contaminated with
gasoline, diesel, lubricating oil, or other
petroleum product.

Following completion of the
demonstrations, verification statements were
prepared for each field measurement device.
The verification statements provided detailed
information for each device including durability,
accuracy and precision, and cost. Although the
devices exhibited varying levels of performance,
the demonstrations indicated that caution should
be exercised when considering five of the

_ devices for site-specific field TPH measurement

application. The demonstrations also indicated
that two of the devices were reliable field
measurement devices for TPH in soil.

Case Study 3: Ex-Situ Harbor Sediment
Remediation (New York/New Jersey Harbor)

The U.S. EPA began working with
BioGenesis Enterprises, Inc. in 1991. Under the
SITE program, BioGenesis. successfully tested
its washing technology on oil-contaminated soil
at a refinery. Subsequently, BioGenesisTM
Washing Technology was extended to fine-
grained sediments and tested by Environment

. Canada.

Regulations governing ocean disposal of
New York/New Jersey Harbor dredged material
were changed in 1992, imposing more stringent _
biological and chemical test criteria. This
resulted in larger volumes of material which are
considered unsuitable for ocean disposal. In
order to maintain safe passage for vessels,
periodic ‘dredging of the harbor channels is
necessary. On an annual basis this maintenance
dredging generates between 6 to 7 million cubic
yards of sediment. Under the new rules passed
in 1992, approximately 4 to 6 million cubic

10°


SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technology Contact Program Status
Ilinois | * | Unstitute'ofGas,.”'-"| Chemical and... “| Robert Kelley . | Emerging Completed 1993
(contisiued):. ‘| ‘Technology | Biological: 847-768-0722: "| Technology :
o von] Treatment ea
: | Bluid Extraction“ | Albert Paterek “| Emerging” ©. | Completed 1992
2 ve “| Biological ‘847-768-0720 "| Technology “|
salt et! : 21 Degradation Pe cea :
hoe Paneth wos |-Process, f ° Bebe.
; ‘| Bluidized-Bed: Mike Mensinger’ | Emerging». | Compléted
. ae Cyclonié .] 847-768-0602." | Technology. .
See ‘Agglomerating | -AmirRehmat’.- |” oh
, <te Ineinerator su, 847-768-0588 A ;
:| nstitute of Gas’. | Superficial ‘Mike Mensinger | Emerging’ °°) Comipleted.'

‘Technology: 847-768-0602 | ‘Tedhinology:- #

OHM)"
‘Environmental,
- formerly RUST. res Aaah .

Remedial Services, 3 mee Benge
Lombard foo |S : Yak Sane as

 Reoycling Sciences; | Desorption aid. 1 Demonstration] ‘Completed =<
edness: ‘Vapor Extrattion ‘Meenan' 0098] He. agin 8
Chicago; System 2) 312-663-4269 :

Dick Ayen |, Demonstration’ : | Completed 1992
803-646-2413 [208 Ss ane

‘Wheelabrator Clean | Evaporation aid’ || Bob Heraquist “'] Demonatiation ‘} Completed ©»

‘Air. Systems Chemical Oxidation .|’708-706-6900. ®
(ormerly:Chemical | : te ky hae . .
| Waste"? : a
Management) .
‘Schinimburg, 1 s
Bio-Rem, Inc. Augmented In-situ | David Mann Demonstration - | Completed 1993
Butler, IN Subsurface 219-868-5823
Bioremediation 800-428-4626
Process
Geoprobe Soil, Water, Vapor | Wes McCall Monitoring and | Conipleted 1995
Salina, KS Sampling Cone Tom Omli Measuring
Penetrometer 800-436-7762 | Technologies
Sevenson Chemical Steve Chisick | Demonstration | Exited
Environmental Stabilization of 219-836-0116
Services, Inc. Mercury Mining
Munster, IN Wastes
Sevenson MAECTITE® Chuck Demonstration | Completed 2000
Environmental Treatment Process | McPheeters
Services, Inc. j 219-836-0116

Munster, IN

A-9



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

L___state [Developer _-[_Tectmotogy | __ Contact _|

California SIVE Services Steam Injection and | Douglas Dieter | Demonstration | Exited
(continued) Dixon, CA Vacuum Extraction | 916-678-8358

SRI Instruments Portable Gas Douglas Monitoring and | Completed 1992

Torrance, CA Chiromatograph Gavilanes ‘Measurement

310-214-5092 __| Technologies

Steam Tech Stéam Enhanced Hank Sowers | Demonstration | Ongoing

Environmental Remediation 661-322-6478

Services

Bakersfield, CA

Steain Tech Inssitu Thermal Hank Sowers | Demonstration | Ongoing

Environmental (Steam Injection) | 661-322-6478

Services

Bakersfield, CA .

Terra-Kleen Solvent Extraction | Alan Cash Demonstration | Completed 1994

‘Response Group, 619-558-8762

Inc. “oe

Del Mar, CA Completed 1997

Texaco, Inc. Entrained-Bed Jobn Wintor Demonstration | Completed 1994

S. El Monte, CA Gasification 310-908-7387

Thermatrix, Inc. Photolytic Steve McAdams | Emerging © Completed 1992

(Formerly Purus, Oxidation 408-453-0490 | Technology

Inc.)

San Jose, CA

U.S. EPA Region | Excavation and John Blevins Demonstration | Completed 1990

ix Foam Suppression | 415-744-2400

San Francisco, CA _| of Volatiles

US. Filter Ultraviolet Jobn Lowry Demonstration | Completed 1989

(formerly Ultrox) _} Radiation and 412-722-1247

Santa Ana, CA Oxidation

Weiss Associates | Blectrochemeial Joe Lovenitti | Demonstration | Ongoing

Emeryville, CA Geoxidation 510-450-6141

Xon Tech; Inc. Xon Tech Sector —_| -Matt Young Monitoring and | Completed 1991

Van Nuys, CA Sampler 818-787-7380 | Measurement

' Technologies

X19 Biological Microbial Paul E. Gill Demonstration | Ongoing

Products, Inc. Degradation of 408-970-9485

PCBs :

CE Systems’. .” | Solvent Extraction: "| LV. Demonstration.” |. Completed 1988

ar us Cotporation: Sa Bat Sa ingfiel ie oe

‘Arvada, CO... "303-420-1550:

otistiation “Conipleted’

“Batch Organics’ PLEO
Extraction Unit ‘Beénningfield

=| Deni
303-420-1550



enhanced recovery is usually applied to contaminated soil, but may also be applied to
groundwater. :

VITRIFICATION uses an electric current to melt contaminated soil at elevated
temperatures (1,600 to 2,000°C or 2,900 to 3,650°F). Upon cooling, the vitrification product is a
chemically stable, leach-resistant, glass and crystalline material similar to obsidian or basalt
rock. The high temperature component of the process destroys or removes organic materials.
Radionuclides and heavy metals are retained within the vitrified product. Vitrification may be
conducted in situ or ex situ. : ,

AIR SPARGING involves the injection.of air or oxygen through a contaminated aquifer.
Injected air traverses horizontally and vertically in channels through the soil column, creating an
underground stripper that removes volatile and semivolatile organic contaminants by
volatilization. Soil Vapor Extraction is usually implemented in conjunction with air sparging to
remove the generated vapor-phase contamination from the unsaturated zone. Oxygen added to
the contaminated groundwater and vadose-zone soils also can enhance biodegradation of
contaminants below and above the water table.

TREATMENT BARRIERS, also known as permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) or passive
treatment walls, are installed across the flow path of a contaminated groundwater plume,
allowing the water portion of the plume to flow through the wall. These barriers allow the
passage of water while prohibiting the movement of contaminants by employing agents within
the wall such as zero-valent metals, chelators, sorbents, and microbes. The contaminants are
either degraded or retained in a concentrated form by the barrier material, which may need to be

replaced periodically.

Conventional Remediation Technologies

For SOIL WASHING, contaminants are absorbed onto fine soil particle surfaces ate
separated from bulk soil in a water-based system on the basis of particle size. The wash water
may be augmented with a basic leaching agent, surfactant, or chelating agent or by adjustment of
pH to help remove organics and heavy metals. Soils and wash water are mixed ex situ in a tank ,
or other treatment unit. The wash water and various soil fractions are usually separated using
gravity settling. ;

VERTICAL ENGINEERED BARRIERS (VEBs) are subsurface barriers made of an

impermeable material designed to contain or divert groundwater. VEBs can be used to contain

D-4



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State [__Developer Technology Contact Program
New Mexico Commodore Set Process for Mark Jones Demonstration. . | Completed 2000
(continued) Advanced Sciences, | PCBs in soil 505:872-6803
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM. .
Resource AlgaSorb Mike Hosea Emerging Completed 1990
Management and | Biological Sorption | 505-382-9228. | Technology
Recovery (formerly :
Bio-Recovery
Systems, Inc.)
Las Cruces, NM.
Sandia National Electrokinetic Eric Lindgren” | Demonstration | Completed:1999
Laboratories Extraction in’: 505-844-3820 ;
Albuquerque, NM. | | Unsaturated Soils | Eatl Mattson
at : 905-856-3311
Thermo Nutech Segmented Gate: | Jeff Brown Emerging Completed ;.°
(formerly TMA System for 423-481-0683 | Technology. | ©
Eberline) Radioactive a :
Albuquerque,NM | Materials
New York Photovac Portable Gas Mark Collins Monitoring and | Completed 1992
International, Inc. | Chromatograph 516-254-4199 | Measurement
Deer Park, NY Technologies
SBP Technologies, | Bioventing, Air Richard Demonstration | Completed 1995
Inc. Sparging, Desrosiers
White Plains, NY | Biological 914-694-2280
‘Treatment for Nick Kolak
Ground Water 518-457-3372
(multi-developer
project with State of
New York)
RECRA Alternating Current | Kenneth Emerging Completed 1992
Environmental, Inc. | Electrocoagula-tion | Kinecki Technology
(formerly Electro- | Technology 800-527-3272
Pure Systems, Inc.)
Amherst, NY
State University of | Photocatalytic Ronald Emerging Completed 1995
New York at Treatment for Scrudato Technology
Oswego Sediments Jeffrey
Oswego, NY Shiarenzelli
315-341-3639
Texaco Syngas, Inc. | Gasification John Winter Demonstration | Completed 1994
White Plains, NY | Process 316-251-4000
ext. 536
Xerox Corporation | Ground Water Ron Hess Demonstration | Completed 1995
Webster, NY Extraction 716-422-3694
Phil Mook
916-643-5443



—¢— Percentage of Source Control Treatment
Technologies that are In Situ

sees Trend Line

aA ALT
TY VA

a 92 93 34

Fiscal Year
Figure 1. Superfund Remedial Actions: In Situ Technologies for
Source Control (FY 1985- FY 1999)

Percentage of In-Site Source Control Treatment Projects

Source: U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Innovative Treatment
Technologies Annual Status Report, Tenth Edition (542-R-01-004)

compared with levels of risk associated with 2002. The SITE Program has also assisted
technologies that do require excavation. vendors in advancing innovative technologies
Further, for large sites where excavation and from the development phase to full-scale
materials handling forex situtechnologiescan _ application, and has promoted greater acceptance
be expensive, in situ technologies are often _ of these technologies. The following subsections
more cost-effective. : provide examples of the financial success of the
SITE Program in terms of federal cost savings and
Historical Program Cost Savings and vendor successes.
Vendor Contracting
SITE Program Accomplishments - Federal Cost
Since its establishment in 1986, the Savings from RODs Analysis
SITE Program has assisted in the development
and use of innovative technologies, resulting Since 1993, the use of innovative
in substantial cost savings for cleaning up _ technologies has outpaced that of established
contaminated sites. The cost savings realized technologies, resulting in dramatic cost savings. «
by federal facilities has been estimated by During 1996, 1999, 2000, and 2001, the SITE
analysis of RODs from 1993 - 1999; this _ Programcollected information from signed RODs
analysis is described below. RODs data is (dated 1993-1999) in all 10 EPA Regions that
made available for the fiscal year that is two, _ selected an innovative technology as the remedy.
years prior to this report. Thus FY 1999 These technologies include soil vapor extraction,
RODs information is presented here. New thermal desorption, bioremediation,
Cost Information from 2000 RODs will be — phytoremediation, surfactant flooding, and many
included in the Report to Congress FY other technologies that have passed through the

4



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration { Technology Contact Program Statu:
Location
New Jersey Wayne, NJ ‘Ex-situ Metal- EnviroMetal Demonstration ~ Completed.
(continued) (Region 2) enhanced: Abiotic “| Technologies, Inc: 1995.
Degredation’ Guelph, Ontario
: ‘William.
Matulewicz
-| 609-722-6700.
‘New Mexico Albuquerque, NM. Electrokenitic Sandia National Demonstration Completed
(Region 6) Extraction in Laboratories, : 1999
Unsaturated Soils | Albuquerque, NM
. Eric Lindgren :
505-844-3820
‘New York Brant, NY Thermal . SoilTech, ATP, Demonstration
Wide Beach Desorption » Systems; Inc. :
(Region 2) Dechlorination: .” Porter, IN.
. Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Brockport, NY Bioyault, =, NY. State. Demonstration
Sweden-3 Chapman Bioventing. Bioremediation 3 : f
Site oe and Groundwater... ‘and SBP. .
QRegion.2) Cirenlation Technologies;Inc, |
Biological White Plains, NY.
‘Treatment Clayton Page
Process 504-755-7711
Guulfi-developer
| ptoject)
‘Niagara Falls, NY Cold Top New Jersey Demotistration
Region 2)... Vitrification Tnstitute'of
: * Technology.
NID)”
‘Newark: NJ and’
Géo Tech..."
Development” °°
Corporation, King
‘of Prussia, PA. :
“William Librizzi “
201-596-5846»
:| Thomas ‘Tate
610-337-8515 0) i
Upstate NY In-situ Metal- | EnviroMetal Demonstration
(Region 2) ,' | ‘enbanced Abiotic “| Technologies, Inc.’ ve
Degredation Guelph, Ontario.
pone John Vogan’
519-824-0432 j



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology
Location
Clear Lake, CA Chemical Sevenson, W.C.
(continued) Stabilization of ‘Munster, IN
Mercury Mining | Steve Chisick
Wastes 219-836-0116
Clear Lake, CA Chemical E&C Williams Demonstration Completed
Stabilization of Summerville, SC . ' 2001 |
Mercury Mining | Charlie Williams |
Wastes 84-821-4200
Edwards AFB, CA CAV-OX Magnum Water Demonstration. Completed |
Qegion 9) Oxidation Technology 1993 i
Process El Segundo, CA. i
Dale Cox t
310-640-7000
Fresno, CA Entrained-Bed Texaco, Inc. Demonstration Completed
Selma Site Gasfication S. El Monte, CA 1994
(Region 9) Jobn Wintor
310-908-7387
Fresno, CA Silicate STC Omega Demonstration Completed i
Selma Site Compounds by (formerly Silicate | 1990 {
(Region 9) Solidification’ | Technology ‘
Stabilizatioin Corporation) i
Scottsdale, AZ t
Steve Pegler
602-948-7100 i
Fullerton, CA Excavation and US. EPA. Demonstration Completed |
McColl Superfund Foam Region 9 1990
Site Suppression of San Francisco, CA
(Region 9) Volatiles Jon Blevins
415-744-2400
Huntington Beach, Steam Injection/ | Hughes Demonstration Completed
CA ‘Vacuum Environmental : 1993
Rainbow Disposal Extraction Manhattan Beach, i
(Region 9) (SIVE) CA
(No longer a |
. vendor for SIVE) '
: Paul De Percin |
U.S. EPA.
513-569-7797
Jackson, CA Biological Pintail Systems, | Demonstration Completed
Pintail Systems, Inc. Stabilization of Inc. 2000
(Region 9) Arsenic in Soils} Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443 1



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

B-4

Demonstration Technology Contact
Location
Livermore, CA. Chemical Calgon Carbon
Lawrence Livermore | Oxidation Oxidation
National Laboratory Perox-Pure Technologies
(LLNL) (formerly
(Region 9) Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Livermore, CA In-situ Enhanced | Berkley
LLNL Extraction Environmental
(Region 9) Restoration
(formerly Udell
Technologies,
Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
March AFB, CA In well Air Roy Weston Demonstration Completed
Qegion 9) Stripping Woodland Hills, 1994
CA
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Port Hueneme, CA Solvated Electron | Commodore Demonstration Completed
‘Naval Facilities Treatment of Environmental 1996
Engineering Service | Chlorinated Columbus, OH
Center Organies Neil Dronby
(Region 9) 614-297-0365
Redding, CA Precipitation, EPOC Water, Inc. | Demonstration Completed
Tron Mountain Microfiltration, Fresno, CA 1993
Superfund Site Sludge Scott Jackson
Dewatering 209-291-8144
Sacramento, CA. Photolytic Process . | Demonstration Exited ~
McClellan AFB Destruction for Technologies, Inc.
(Region 9) SVE Off-gases Boise, ID
. Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Sacramento, CA Groundwater Xerox Two Phase | Demonstration Completed
McClellan'‘AFB Extraction Extraction 1995
Region 9) ‘Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
San Diego, CA Circulating Bed General Atomics Demonstration Completed
Cumbuster (formerlt Ogden 1989
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE : |

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location

Alaska Fairbanks, AK ‘Soil Washing Brice Demonstration Completed

ABE : : Environmental : : 1992 |
Superfund Site : Services»; ‘ i
Region 10) a '|’ Corporation i

| @ESCORP), :
Fairbanks,;AK : :
Graig Jones... \ : i
907-452-2515 Lo

Arizona Phoenix, AZ Low Smith Demonstration . | Completed |
Pesticide Site Temperature Environmental 1992

Qegion 9) Thermal Aeration | Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO ‘
Joe Hutton i
219-926-8651

Phoenix, AZ Anaerobic Smith Demonstration Completed

Pesticide Site Thermal, Environmental H
(Region 9) Processor Services (formerly :
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton H
219-926-8651 i

Phoenix, AZ In-situ Bio-Rem Demonstration Completed
Williams AFB Subsurface Butler, IN 1993 {
Region 9) Bioremediation | David O. Mann
219-868-5823

Arkansas Jefierson, AR +} Tunable-Pulse Sonotéch, Inc Demonstration Completed | |
Incineration Research Combustion“: "."'] “Atlanta, GA: * cys “} 1995

Facility (RE) ES 2°} Ben Zinn aie
Region 6) oe hs a0 894-3033, oe fe

Pyreton Buiter |’ American’?
all Combustion’.
‘Technologiés
=| Noreross,‘GA: ety .
Gregory Gitman ' : . aS tie
404:564-4180°. egrances Meter eace

“|. Demonstration. ‘Completed:
| 1988»

California Burbank, CA. Integrated In-situ | Radian Demonstration Completed
Lockheed Site Vapor Extraction | Corporation 1990
(Region 9) and Steam (formerly AWD
‘Vacuum ~ | Technologies,
Stripping Process | Inc.) i
‘Walnut Creek, CA i
David Bluestein
415-227-0822 {

Clear Lake, CA * Biostabilization Pinta Systems, | Demonstration Completed i
of Mercury H
Mining Wastes Aurore, co
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443

B-2 .



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State

Demonstration
Location

Technology

Contact

Program

Status

Colorado

Clear Creek, CO
Burleigh Tunnel
(Region 8)

Wetland-Based
‘Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage

Colorado .’

‘Departnient'of:

Health
Denver,'CO
Jim' Lewis
303-692:3390.

Demonstration

Completed
1999 23

Denver, CO
Rocky Flats
Qegion 8)

Colloid Polishing

Method —.

Filter Flow
Technology.
League City, TX
Tod Johnson
713-334-6080.

| Demonstration.

Completed
1992

Denver, CO
DOE Rocky Flats *
(Region 8) °

Core Barrel Soil
Sampler

"sidiulprobe é

Technologies, Inc.
CA Pett
Richard Laton

°°] "Monitoring and.

Measurement:

Denver, CO
(Region 8)

Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler

415-883-8787.

Art's, é
‘Manufacturing’ and,
‘Supply 2."
“American Falls;

| -ap

‘Brian:Andeérson:
800-635-7330,

‘Monitoritigiand
‘Measurement

Denver, CO
(Region 8)

Electrocoa-
gilation

General

‘} Environmental

‘Inc, :Gormerly:
Hydrologics, Inc.)
Englewood, CO-
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960

Demonstration

1

Denver, CO
(Region 8)

EMPLUK Soil
Gas Survey
System: :

Quadrel Services,
Tne,

MD. 3
Biuce Tucker,
Paul Henning
301-874-5510

‘Monitoring and’
Measurement

| Completed:

Denver, CO
(Region 8)

“Gore-Scnibber’

Passive.Soil Gas,
Samples

W. L: Gore and’:
Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray.

‘| Fenstermacher

410-392=7600...°.:

‘Monitoring'and
Measiirement:

Completed

Denver, CO.
(Region 8)

Clements

1A ;
Jim Clements
515-792-8285

‘Associates, Inc... |

Completed »



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technology | __Contact Program Status

Vermont Green Mountain. . | Biodegradation of | | Adam‘Longee »'| Demonstration | Completed 2000
Laboratories PCBs in Soils 802-223-1468 :

Virginia BioGenesis Soil Washing/ Charles Wilde | Demonstration | Completed 1992
Enterprises, Inc. Biological 703-250-3442 :
Fairfax Station, VA | Treatment
BWXTech, Inc. | Cyclone Furnace | Evan Reynolds | Emerging Completed 1992
(Affiliate of 804-522-6000 | Technology
Babcock and
Wilcox Co. Demonstration | Completed 1991
Lynchburg, VA
Dynaphore, Inc. Removal of Norman Rainer | Demonstration | Completed 1994
Richmond, VA Dissolved Heavy | 804-288-7109

Metals via

FORAGER Sponge
ITT Industries Enhanced In-Situ | Rosann Demonstration | Completed 1999
Roanoke, VA. Bioremediation of | Kryczkowski

Chlorinated 540-362-7356

Compounds

Washington ECOVA Bioshimy Reactor. | Alan Jones Demonstration’. | Completed ‘1991
Corporation : 206-883-1900, | ' os
Redmond, WA :

Geosafe In-situ Vitrfication - | TameS Hansen | Demonstration’ | Completed 1994
Corporation * 4 || Matthew Haass} - .
Richland, WA 509-375-0710,
Ionics/ Resources’ | BEST Solvent “William Hinés”~|' Denionstration ‘| Completed 1992
Conservation Co. | Extraction 206-828-2400
Bellevue, WA . ©
Keeco Chemical. Amy Anderson... | Demonstiation.” | Completed 2001
Stabilization of 888-977-9156 : ane
Meréury Mining]
Wastes °°
Remediation Methanotrophic Hans Stroo Emerging ‘Completed.1995
Technologies, Inc... | Biofilm Reactor 206-624-9349. |’ Technology
(ReTec) Seattle, - ; oo
WA |
Remediation Liquid and Soils --| ‘Mery Cooper *-’ | Detnonstration. , | Completed 1994
Technologies, Inc, |. Biological. 206-624-9349 fe poe
(ReTec) Seattle, Treatment EER
WA :
Scitee Corporation | Field Portable X=''.~'} Steve Santy ‘Monitoring and | ‘Coiipleted 1995
Richland, WA Ray Fluoresceiice; | 800-466.5323::] Measurement » |. dae
509-783-9850... | “Téchnologies 4
University of Asdorptive Mark Benjamin’ | Emerging Completed 1992"
Washington Filtration 206-543-7645. | Technology :
Seattle, WA : i

A-20



[ 1. SITE Demonstration Projects Completed in FY 01
ve

Developer | Developer Technology Site Location
Location
Sc, WA E&C This project involved chemical:stabilization of mercury mining Butte, MT*
Williams, wastes., Largé scale column leaching tests were conducted in yo
Keeco cooperation with EPA’s Mine Waste Technology Program. ‘Several
vendor treatments to stabilize Hg in-sitii were evaluated including the ©
use of silicates; sulfides; atid phosphates! °° :
WI Minergy This project involves utilizing a glass furnace to melt dried river Fox River, WI
sediment contaminated with PCBs. The glass furnace temperature is
expected to destroy the organic compounds and to form a glass
aggregate product that has beneficial reuse properties.
co Region 8 and’ :| This projéct involved multiple innovative, passive and’se1 i passive
State of mine drainage technologies:”. Technologies évaluated includéd the.»
Colorado ‘Aquafix lithe despensing water wheel with retention in seitling
an oxidation pond, a'SAPS system, and a limestone lined channel.
I OH U.S. EPA, Alternate Cover Assessment Program (ACAP) - The ACAP is a 12 sites around
NRMRL cooperative partnership of industry, government, and research the nation
institutions that will evaluate evapotranspiration and break cover
systems. The program is expected to provide cost-effective alternative
cover designs, and assist in the development of designs at other sites. .
WA Wilder |__| MatCon is aniddified asphiilt system:for primary ‘us¢/as:an exposed ‘Dover, DEiand,
Construction. | hydraulic containment cover system. When combined with selécted* | “Elgin, IL".
Co. aggregates the material can be used as a barrier layer or'as a diainage :
Jayer: Together, the material can form. a multilayer drained cap atop
tend ills or ‘Sontaminated sails,

* Column and humidity cell tests on waste from sulphur bank mercury mine Tocated i in Clear Lake, CA.

14


SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technolo; Contact Program Status
Indiana Soil Tech, ATP Thermal Desorption | Joe Hutton Demonstration | Completed 1992
(continued) Systems Ine 219-926-8651

Porter, IN
Towa Clements IMC. Jim Clements... | Monitoring and’. | Completed
Associates, Inc. -Environmentalist’s 515-792-8285 Measurements .
_ Subsoil Probe i | Technologies
Kansas Geoprobe Systems | Large Bore Soil Wesley McCall | Monitoring and | Completed
Salina, KS Sampler Tom Omli Measurements
800-436-7762 _| Technologies
Kentucky Microsensor Portable Gas '| ‘Norman Davis | “Monitoring and. |-Completed 1995
System, Inc..." |} Cliromtatograpti «| 502-752-1353 | Measurement ~~ |: :
Bowling Green, KY : | Technologies ‘
Louisiana Advanced Solidificationand | Sam Pizzitola | Demonstration. | Completed 1989
Remediation Stabilization 504-461-0466
Mixing, Inc,
(Formerly Chemfix
Technologies, Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Blectrokineties, Inc. } Electrokinetic Elif Acar Emerging Completed 1989
Baton Rouge,LA | Remediation 504-388-3992 | Technology
Exited
Demonstration
Bleotro-Klean Blif Acar Emerging Exited
Eleotrokinetic 504-753-8004 | Technology
Soil Remediation
SBP Technologies, | Membrane Clayton Page | Demonstration | Completed
Inc, Separation and 504-755-711 1995
Baton Rouge, LA _|. Bioremediation
Maryland Quadrel Services, "| Emflux® Soil-Gas -|"Bruce Tucker, | Monitoring and. | Completed."
Ine. Survey System... | Paul Henning | Measurement
\ ‘{/301-874-5510' “| Technologies:
W.L. Gore and Gore-Sorubber® "| Ray. Monitoring and: || Completed
Associates, Inc, Passive Soil'Gas | - :|"Fenstermacher . | Meastirement..
Sampler 410:392:7600 | ‘Technologies’
Massachusetts ABB Anaerobic/ Willard Murray | Emerging Completed 1998
Environmental Aerobic Sequential | 617-245-6606 | Technology
Services, Inc. Bioremediation
Wakefield, MA

Harding Lawson
Associates
(formally ABB
Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Wakefield, MA

Two-Zone Plume
Interception In-situ
‘Treatment Strategy

Jaret Johnson.
Willard Murray
617-245-6606

Emerging
Technology

Harding-Lawson
Engineers

Wakefield, MA.

In-situ Anerobic-
aerotic
Bioremediation.

A-10

William Murray
617-245-6606

Demonstration



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State - Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Locati

New Hampshire | Plaistow, NH Biodegradation | Green Mountain

Demonstration
(continued) Region 1) of PCB’s in Soils | Laboratories 2000
Montpelier, VT
; Adam Longee
802-223-1468
|New Jersey." Bdison, NI: Dehydro Tech -| Demonstration: "| Completed. ;
ae | BPA: Corporation pS 1991"
‘Region 2)... - East Hanover, NU Bphe
Ws acpgte es ‘Theodore. code are
ae “Trowbridge! 0) fe ae 7
: 908-904-1606 : nee :
=. | Hillsborough, NI“ °| 'Accuitech; Ine.“ *."'| “Demonstration Completed:
“| Region’ 2)"

‘| Reyport NT & ae eo Peygog 3 4
New Jersey: B 5 i
‘Anstitute'of

ASNT. :
2 | John, Liskowitz,
©} 908-739-6444!"

‘| Demonstration’

‘ Millville;
Naseoilte'Site
Region:

Completed

Saco) aoe aaa

‘Morganville NI ‘Soliditech, Inc,

Imperial Oil Co, Ine.

Soa 13-497 8558.

“| Removal of -! |] Dynaphore/
| Dissolved Metals Hare

Completed. :
1994000"

‘Phytotech, Ine:) =
Monmouth, NJ
“| Burt Ensley:

| 908-438-0900,»

| cTrenton, Ni?



Foreword

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting

. the Nation’s land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the

Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human
activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA’s
research program is providing data and technical support for solving environmental problems today
and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely,
understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.

The National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency’s center for
investigation of technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks from
pollution that threaten human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory’s research
program is on methods and their cost-effectiveness for prevention and control of pollution to air,
land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public water systems;
remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and ground water; prevention and control of indoor
air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public and private
sector partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate emerging
problems. NRMRL’s research provides solutions to environmental problems by: developing and
promoting technologies that protect and improve the environment; advancing scientific and
engineering information to support regulatory and policy decisions; and providing the technical
support and information transfer to ensure implementation of environmental regulations and
strategies at the national, state, and community levels.

This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory’s strategic long-term research
plan. It is published and made available by EPA’s Office of Research and Development to assist the
user community and to link researchers with their clients.

A Hugh W. McKinnon, Director
\ National Risk Management Research Laboratory

iii



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

| State

Demonstration
Location

Technology

Contact

Program

Ohio (continued)

DOE Femald Facility,
OH

(Region 5)

‘Solvent

Extraction,

.| Terra Kleen,

Corporation (name’
changéd back
‘from Sevienson
Extraction
Techhology, Inc.)
Del Mar;.CA

Alan Cashi
619-558-8762."

Demonstration

8.

Roseville/.
Crooksville, OH

-Envirobond ‘Soil

Amendment *
(Stabilization)

Rocky Moitntain:
Remedation
Services”

Jim Batthel

‘Demonstration -

Completed

Roseville/
Crooksville, OF

| Injectioa Soil

‘Amendment...
(Stabilization)

303-215-6620
) Star Organios,

1 Phil Clarke

214-522-0742

Completed

Oregon

Clackamas, OR
Portable Equipment
Co. Site

Region 10)

Chemical
Fixation/
Stabilization

Advanced
Remediation
Mixing, Inc.
(formerly Chemfix
Technologies,
Inc.)

Metarie, LA

Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466

Demonstration

Completed
1989

Pennsylvania

Douglasville, PA

Region’ 3)

Solidification/
Stabilization

‘Hazcori-and:
Funderbutk &
Associates)":
Apollo Béach, FL.
‘Ray Funiderburk
813-645-9620,

‘Demonstration |.”

Contipieied
1987."

Monaca, PA

Horsehead.

‘Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810

Demonstration.

| Completed

Palmerton, PA
Palmerton Zine Pile
(Region 3)

‘Membrane:

Microfiltration  * »

ELL DuPont
DeNeinours &
Company,
‘Newark, DE,
‘Oberlin Filter
Company
Waukesha; WI
Emmest, Mayer
302-774-2277

-| Completed

1990":



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

*Mo.Téc Ine.).

Pitsburg, PA:
‘David Nakles::
412-826-3340.

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location
New Voik Utica; NY i Maxyinillian”” Demonstration ‘Completed
(continued): | (Region 2) ‘Temperature ‘Technologies, Inc! " 1993
, : Thermal (Formerly Clean
Processor Berkshires)
. Lanesboro, MA.
Fi - ’|. Jind Maxymiillian.
i [413-499-3050
Utica, NY. S85 stunry 2 Remediation, “| Demonstiation “-’ | Gompleted
Town:Gas Site Biodegradation ~’. ‘| “Technologies Inc. ° 4991 8°
(Region:2) 4 (ReTeo} formerly.’ 5

Morrisville, NC Base-Catalyzed
Koppers Site Destruction
Region 4) @ehalogenation)

US. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Environmental
Ine.

Blue Bell, PA
‘Yei-Shong Shich
215-832-0700

Demonstration

Completed
1993

| Region. 5)

: Cyclone

“ Babeock & Wilcox. ‘Vitrification’
‘Alliance’ Research: oe
Center

Babeock &

Wilcox Alliance **

Research Center

| “Alliaiice, OF,
‘Lawrence King’
* | 216-829-7576

Demonstration”. “|

Conipleted
1991.

‘ieineinnaty Oat”
“EPA TRE Racility
‘Region 5) :

- Bioslarry Reactor

BCOVA
Corporation: °\:
‘Redmond, WA
‘Alan Jones
206-883-1900”

Demonstration

Compisied °
1991

: Cracks le, OH
‘Pintail: ystems In The:
= Region 5):

Biostabilization’
of Lead:

Pintail Systems,"

Tac.
‘Aurord, CO.

‘Leslie Thompson’ 2

303+367-8443

Demonstration.”

| -2000.

Completed

; Dayton, OH.
: Regions)

7 USP ERAS 2

NRMRL:
innati,.OH
William Slack":

513-469-6040, *

Demonstration:

Completed
1992,



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location
Texas Goldthwaite, TX Microbial “Micro-BAC Int, ‘Demonstration Ongoing
(continued) (Region 6) ‘Degradation of:,»"}-TX 2: *
PCBs...” 512-310-9000
: X-19:Biological
Products, CA’
“408-970-9485,
‘San Antonio, TX. ‘Hot Air Injection” | ‘Hrubetz, Demonstration. Coinpleted
Kelly AFB Set Evironmental . 1993."
‘Region 6) ‘ Serviées, ‘Inc:
Daillas,'TX: :
. Michael'or:
San Antonio, TX: -Radiow Completed
Kelly AFB “frequency 1994
Region 6) Heating s
: Oak Ridge, IN’...
Clifford Blanchard’
2 evi}, 615-483-9900 i 7
‘San Antonio, TX Radio: « KAVHNUS». | Demonstration ‘Completed
Kelly AEB |), frequency Oak Ridge,"TN |v be 19940:
(Region 6) “Heating: ‘Cliff Blanchard .
; 615-483-9900, <:
Utah Hill AFB, UT Steam Injection/ | Praxis Demonstration Completed
(Region 8) Vacuum Environmental 1997
Extraction Services
San Francisco, CA,
Dr. Lloyd Steward
415-641-9044
Midvale Slag, UT Molecular Solucorp © Demonstration Completed
. Bonding System | Saddleback, NJ
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333 '
Ogden, UT Phytoremediation | Phytokinetics, Inc. | Demonstration Completed
Chevron Transfer of Petroleum in Logan, UT 1999 |
Facility Soil and Ari Ferro
Qegion 8) Groundwater 801-750-0985
Virginia Roanoke, VA Enhanced In-situ.’ | ITT Industries ‘Demonstration °° |" Completed. |
ITT Night Vision Bioremediation : ‘| Roanoke, VA: ae ue 1999 |
Facility of Chlorinated “| Rosanii- :
(Region 3). . Compounds Kryezkowski :
eee 540-362-7356.

B-20



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State [_ Developer__- |_| Technology Contact Program Statns
California Energy and Reactor Filter. Neil Widmer | Emerging . Completed 1995,
(continued) - | Environmental System 714-859-8851 | Technology

Research :
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Environmental Mictobial Douglas Emerging Completed 1999
Biotechnologies Composting Munnecke Technology Completed
Montara, CA 415-596-1020 | Demonstration
EPOC Water, Inc, | Precipitation, Scott Jackson | Demonstration | Completed 1993
Fresno, CA Microfiltration, 209-291-8144

Sludge Dewatering
General Atomics | Circulating Bed Robert Goforth | Demonstration | Completed 1989
(formerly Ogden | Combuster 619-455-2499
Environmental !
* Services)
“San Diego, CA.

Acoustic Barrier Anthony Emerging Completed 1995

Separator Gattuso Technology

619-455-2910

: Geokinetics Electtokinetics Steven Clark Demonstration. Completed 2000
Berkeley,CA  - : 510-704-2940
Geokinetics Closed Loop Lead | Steven Clark | Demonstration | Ongoing
Berkeley, CA Recovery 510-704-2940
Geokinetics& | Electrokinetic Steven Clark | Demonstration | Completed 1999
Duke Engineering | Heating & 510-704-2940

Surfactant Flushing
“GlS\Solutions, Inc.| GIS\Key Garry Reid Demonstration | Completed 1993
Concord,.CA Environmental Data | 510-827-5400

Management

Software
» Groundwater Biological Ronald Hicks | Emerging Completed 1995
Technology Composting 510-671-2387 | Technology
‘Government :
Services, Inc.
Concord, CA ;
Hughes SteamEnhanced | PaulDePercin | Demonstration | Completed 1993
Environmental Recovery Process | U.S. EPA
+ Systems, Inc. : 513-569-7797
Manhattan Beach, |
CA i
Integrated Water | Stripping of TCE —_| 805-565-0996 | Demonstration | Ongoing
Resources, Inc. :
Lockheed Martin | Blectrokinetic Steven HL Demonstration | Completed
Missiles & Space | Remediation Schwartzkopf
Co., Inc. 415-424-3176
Palo Alto, CA



yards annually now require some form of
processing or decontamination prior to disposal
of the material.

U.S. EPA Region 2 and Army Corps of
Engineers, NY District, are jointly directing a
project funded by the Water Resources
Development Act (WRDA) to demonstrate
decontamination technologies. Department of
Energy-Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)
is managing demonstrations by the téchnology
vendors. Based on U.S. EPA SITE program and
Environment Canada testing, BioGenesis was
selected into the program. The WRDA project
goal is to establish a production-scale facility
able to treat 500,000 cubic yards of dredged
material annually. In addition to successful
removal or treatment of organic’ contaminants
(including polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAH) and. organochlorides such as dioxins,
furans, and PCBs) and heavy metals, the WRDA
project is addressing the.additional issues of
materials handling and beneficial use of treated
or decontaminated material. f

Technology Descriptions i

The BioGenesisTM Soil and Sediment
Washing Process is an ex-situ, on-site extraction
technology for cleaning organic pollutants and
metals. Unlike other washing processes,
BioGenesisTM“ washing is a true cleaning
process. It does not simply reduce volume as in
conventional washing technology. | Typical
removal percentages range from: 70-99%
depending on process parameters and required
cleanup levels. i

The process begins by screening the
contaminated sediment down to particle sizes
less than % inch in diameter. The material is
then collected in a storage tank where water and
a proprietary cleaning chemical are added and
mixed to create a homogenized slurry: This
slurry is next fed through the company’s. own
proprietary, patented equipment where . the
sediment particles are separated from each other
and the contaminants removed. The slurry is

11

then dewatered using a variety of equipment
including hydrocyclones, centrifuges, and sand
filters. The treated dewatered sediment can then
be used for beneficial use applications including
manufactured soil and construction industry
products such as~bricks, coatings, and light
aggregate. The liquid portion of the slurry is
decontaminated using standard wastewater
treatment techniques such as precipitation and
oxidation.

Status

Since entering the WRDA project in
1995, BioGenesis has performed several
successful optimization tests on NY/NJ Harbor
sediment. In March 1999 the company
completed a pilot project for the WRDA project
using sediment supplied by the Port Authority of
NY/NJ. The project finished on schedule and
successfully cleaned over 700 yd? of sediment.

Based on the results from the pilot
project, the U.S. EPA Region 2 approved the
implementation of a commercial-scale facility
capable of processing over 250,000 yd* per
year. BioGenesis has teamed with Montgomery
Watson Harza for engineering and BASF
Corporation for chemicals. Design has been
completed for the initial phase of full-scale
implementation. BioGenesis is currently on site
in Kearny, New Jersey decontaminating soil
using washing technology first tested in 1992 in
the SITE program. Full-scale production is
anticipated to begin by the latter half of 2003.


Future Direction

Introduction ;
, SITE Program Partners
. wet eas + DOD Envi tal Security and Technol
The science of site investigation has Certification Program (&STCP) eennoney

advanced dramatically in the past 20 years.
Advancements in field detection equipment and
laboratory analyses - have revealed new

+ DOE Office of Science and Technology
+ EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
+ EPA Regional Offices

information about the problems at waste sites.

In addition, years of experience in the
cleanup of hazardous waste sites have shown that
quick, inexpensive solutions are usually elusive.
As a remediation proceeds, the task of site
cleanup is often found to be much greater and
much more complex than was originally expected.
Thus the improvements in site investigation and
the lessons learned from both successful and
unsuccessful site remediation have demonstrated
a great demand for effective , innovative
technologies. j

Anumber of promising technologies based
on sound scientific principles, but lacking
engineering and performance documentation, are
appearing on the horizon. Some of these,

* described below, are being studied under the
SITE Program, and by the U.S. Department of
Energy, U.S. Department of Defense, and others.
It is likely that field demonstrations: may occur
within the next few years for these technologies or
for second-generation improvements of these
techniques. :

The SITE Program continues to emphasize
the importance of first selecting a site and,
secondly, evaluating one or more appropriate
innovative technologies. The selection of these
sites and technologies is important in meeting the
needs of those responsible for selecting and

17

implementing hazardous waste cleanup. Over
the past several years the SITE program has
been focusing on in-situ techniques. A wide
range of representation from relevant federal
and state agencies helps ensure that the most
pressing issues are prioritized and addressed.

In response to stakeholders demand,
the MMT Program initiated a series of
demonstrations designed ‘to evaluate
innovative sampling and analysis
technologies. The MMT Program has
identified a number of possible candidate
technologies for demonstration in FY02. One
category of technology is testing mercury in
soil. In addition, similar dioxin testing has
also been planned for FY02. .These projects
are designed to address ongoing difficulties in
obtaining representative samples at defined
depths, or obtaining accurate analytical results
using less expensive and less complex
equipment.

Technology Areas of Primary Interest

One of the critical needs for -
remediation technology is for methods to
accelerate aquifer cleanup. Groundwater
contamination may consist of dissolved-phase
contaminant plumes, light non-aqueous phase



AOD

2 0- z
g 7o+4 :
fa) 60 4
S
© 504
Oo
a) 404
g
2 30+
204
Oin-situ
BREx-Situ’
O=ongoing

C= complete? 3

Figure 6. History of Ex Situ vs In Situ Distribution of SITE

Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Program

The MMT Program has levéraged its
resources with EPA’s Environmental
Technology Verification Program. These two
programs, known collectively as the Consortium
for Site Characterization Technologies, have
developed a partnership .with the DOE.
Resources from the SITE Program are used
solely for those technologies addressing
hazardous waste. ' This partnership will help to
addiess the demands on the MMT Program and
reduce the backlog of applications submitted by
developers of innovative technologies.

To further advance the MMT Program,
a stakeholder group was formed to, assist in
outreach activities and in the selection of
technologies. An advocates program involving
the EPA Regional offices was also established
to assist in the MMT demonstration process and
to ensure that the products of the
demonstrations address issues relevant to EPA.



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technok Contact Program Status
California Magnum Water CAV-OX Process Dale Cox Demonstration Completed 1993
(continued) Technology 310-322-4143 .

El Segundo, CA. Jack Simser
310-640-7000
Membrane ‘VaporSep Mare Jacobs Emerging Completed 1991
‘Technology and Membrane Process | Doug Technology :
Research, Inc. Gottschlich
Menlo Park, CA 415-328-2228
North American Oleofilter Cathryn Demonstration | Completed
Technologies . Wimberly
Aprotek 916-366-6185
San Ramon, CA
NOVATERRA, In-situ and Air Philip LaMori Demonstration. Completed 1989
Inc. (formerly Stripping 310-328-9433
Toxic Treatments *
USA, Inc.)
| Los Angeles, CA
Praxis In-situ Steam Lloyd Stewart Demonstration Completed 1997
Environmental Enhanced 415-641-9044
1 Services Extraction
Burlingame, CA
Pulse Sciences, X-Ray Treatment Vernon Bailey Emerging Completed 1994
San Leandro, CA (Aqueous) 510-632-5100 | Technology
: ext. 227 :
X-Ray Treatment | Vernon Bailey “| Emerging Completed
(Soils) 510-632-5100 Technology
ext, 227
Radian Corporation | Integrated Vapor David Bluestein | Demonstration Completed 1990
(formerly AWD Extraction and 415-227-0822
Technologies, Inc.) | Steam Vacuum
Walnut Creek, CA _| Stripping
Regenesis Biological ‘Dr. Stephen Demonstration Ongoing
Treatment, HRC of | Koeningberg
Organics 949-366-8000
Retech, Inc, Plasma Arc ‘| Ronald Demonstration Completed 1991
‘Ukiah, CA Vitrification ‘Womack Leroy
B. Leland 707-
462-6522
Rochem Separation | Rochem Disc Tube | David Demonstration Completed 1994
Systems, Inc. ~ Module System LaMonica
Torrance, CA * ‘ ° 310-370-3160
Roy F. Weston Tn well Air Jeff Bannon Demonstration Completed 1994
Sherman Oaks, CA | Stripping 818-971-4900
Eric Klingel
704-660-1673
Simulprobe Core Barrel Soil Richard Laton Monitoring and | Completed
Technologies, Inc. Sampler 415-883-8787 Measurement

A-4

Technologies



150

i ee
December October March 1992 June 1994
14990 1991

June 1996 June 1998 March 2000

Figure 4. Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation

(Source: 1990-2000 vendor information)
Soil Washing
“2% ;
Vitrification Other Thermal Desorption

Stabilization / 2% 2%
Solidification Soll Vapor

20% Extraction

29%

Filtration .

9 Bioremediation
TM% 22%
Oxidation :
2% Chemical
Electro-chemical Treatment
1% 10%

Figure 5. Share of 3,220 total contracts awarded to SITE Demonstration vendors by technology
type (Source: 2000 vendor information)

8



This Appendix presents definitions and brief discussions of the innovative remediation
technologies mentioned in the text of this Annual SITE Report. Established/conventional |
technologies (including pump and treat, stabilization, vitrification, incineration, and
excavation/disposal) are being replaced by these state-of-the-art, typically more cost-effective

technologies are also presented.

Innovative Remediation Technologies : . i

BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants in either
excavated or in situ soil, sludge, and solids. The microorganisms break down contaminants by
using them as a food source or cometabolizing them with a food source. Land farming, biopiles,
composting, and slurry-phase bioremediation are examples of ex situ applications. Bioventing is !
acommon form of in situ bioremediation which uses extraction wells to circulate air through the
ground, sometimes also pumping air into the ground. '

CHEMICAL TREATMENT, also known as chemical reduction/oxidation, typically
converts hazardous contaminants to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds that are more stable,

Jess mobile, or inert. The oxidizing agents most commonly used for treatment of hazardous
contaminants in soil are ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, chlorine dioxide,
potassium permanganate, and Fentons reagent (hydrogen peroxide and iron). Cyanide oxidation
and dechlorination are examples of chemical treatment. This method may be applied in situ.or
ex situ, to soils, sludges, sediments, and other solids, and may also be applied for the in situ
treatment of groundwater. :

IN SITU SOIL FLUSHING: large volumes of water, at times supplemented with
surfactants, cosolvents, or treatment compounds, are applied to the soil or injected into the
groundwater to raise the water table into the contaminated soil zone, Injected water and
treatment agents are isolated within the underlying aquifer and recovered together with flushed i
contaminants. i

PHYTOREMEDIATION is a process that uses plants (roots, shoots, tissues, and leaves)
to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants in soil, sediment, and groundwater.

Phytoremediation applies to all biological, chemical, and physical processes that are influenced
by plants and that aid in cleanup of the contaminated substances. Plants can be used in site
remediation, both through the mineralization of toxic organic compounds and through the

accumulation and concentration of heavy metals and other inorganic compounds from soil into

D-2



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

910-962-3450

State ~ Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status |
Location
Pennsylvania Stroudsburg, PA Contained. ©] Western Research | Demonstration Completed
(continued) (Region 3) Recovery OF Oi | Institute” * * a : 1997
t 1 James Speight: .”
hen 307-721-2011
Rhode Island Central Landfill, Reverse ROCHEM Demonstration Completed
RI Osmosis: Disc- | Separations, Inc. 1994
(Region 1) Tube Module Torrence, CA
Technology David LaMonica
310-370-3160
N. Smithfield, RI ARI KSE, Inc. Demonstration. Completed
Qegion 1). Photocatalytic Ambhurst, MA 1999
Technology for James Kittrell
Air Streams 413-549-5506
South Carling: | ‘Savannah River, ste | High Energy: ~ | High Voltage’: || Demonstration,
ie sc Inadiation for Bavironmental.:’~
=} Region 4): 21. Destruction of “| Application; Inc.
i ee 4 Organics in: Florida ;
Aqueous. si and-International::
: Solutions and. berayiecs Miami
“Sludge’
f = Willen Cooper

Photocatalytic

Tennessee Oak Ridge, TN Matrix, Inc. Demonstration Completed
Region 4) Aqueous Phase | London, ON 1995
Organics Robert Henderson
Destruction 519-660-8669
Matrix
Oak Ridge, TN Freeze Barrier Aretic Demonstration Completed
DOE Oak Ridge Foundations 1998
Facility ! Anchorage, AK
Region 4) Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
:| Phytoremediation | ASC/EMR. Demonstration. Completed
Q£TCE ins. Wright Patterson : * 1998
AEB»:
Dayton, Ohio. ¢
‘Greg Harvey.’

"$13-255-7716 9.

| Goldthwaits, TX

sy il) Lower: Colorado River:

‘Authority Blectrical’::
‘| Substation :

Solvant’:

‘Extraction -“

Envirogen, Inc,“

-] Lawrenceville, NI

Ronald Unterman,
609-936-9300

| Denionstration’



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

Demonstration
Location.

Livermore, CA.
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
(LLNL)

Qegion 9)

Technology

Chemical
Oxidation
Perox-Pure

Contact

Program

=]

Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681

Demonstration

Completed
1995

Livermore, CA.
LLNL
(Region 9)

In-situ Enhanced
Extraction

Berkley
Environmental
Restoration
(formerly Udell
Technologies,
Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477

Completed
1993

Roy Weston
Woodland Hills,
CA

Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900

Port Hueneme, CA
‘Naval Facilities
Engineering Service
Center

Region 9)

Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics

Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, OH
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365

Demonstration

Redding, CA
Tron Mountain
Superfund Site

Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
Dewatering

EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA

Scott Jackson
209-291-8144

Demonstration

Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)

Photolytic
Destruction for
SVE Off-gases

Process .
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID

Michael Swan
208-385-0900

Demonstration

Sacramento, CA
McClellan’ AFB
(Region 9)

Groundwater
Extraction

Xerox Two Phase
Extraction
Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694

Demonstration.

Completed
1995

San Diego, CA ,

General Atomics
(formerlt Ogden
Environmental
Services)

San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499

Demonstration

Completed
1989



Executive Summary

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization and implementation of innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies for 16 years. SITE offers a mechanism for conducting joint technology
demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the private sector, EPA,
and other federal and state agencies. The program provides environmental decision-makers with
relevant data on new, viable remediation technologies that may have performance or cost advantages
compared to conventional treatment technologies. Since the initiation of the SITE Program in 1986,
cleanup of contaminated sites through the use of innovative technologies has resulted in an estimated
total inflated cost savings of over $2.6 billion. The basis for estimation of cost savings is discussed
on page 5 of this report.

The SITE Program focuses on the remediation needs of the hazardous waste remediation
community through program planning; matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions;
technology field demonstrations; and information dissemination. The SITE Program’s vision is to
remain the premier organization in enhancing the credibility and implementation of effective
innovative remediation options.

The SITE Program continues to earn recognition as a leader in advancing innovative
technology development and commercialization. The program is participating with 145 remediation
technology vendors. Through FY 01, the SITE Program has successfully demonstrated 137
technologies, 16 of which were demonstrated during FY 01. Emphasis formerly placed on
technologies requiring the removal of soil or groundwater (ex situ) has gravitated nearly exclusively
to in situ technologies that treat contamination in place.

To ensure that the program continues to meet the needs of the remediation community, the
SITE Program established a remediation stakeholder group. This group, which is composed of such
agencies as EPA, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Energy, reviews innovative
technology applications and develops an environmental emphasis area list, which ensures that the
most pressing issues are prioritized and addressed.



Appendix A

SITE PROJECTS
(Alphabetically by Developer State)



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES -‘BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program
Location
Vouisiina’: "| Fort Polk LA Blectrokinetic ~ | Blectréidnetios, °’ | Demonstration ~ | Exited

Baton Rouge, LA’. Spe
Elif Acar
504-388-3992: ©

‘Region 6) ‘Extraction ” Inc:

°|"Lake Charles, LA’ Evaporation and’ | Wheelbrator Clean:-| Demionstration *' | Completed. |
p Chemical "°° | “Air Systems is
Oxidation’ ".:*" ».'|" formerly”
Binh oS Chemical: Waste’
“Management):
‘Schaumburg, IL. oe
Bob. Heinquist ee
708-706-6900 2° |. ‘

Maine - | Loring AFB In-situ Thermal - | Steam Tech Demonstration Ongoing
Caribou, ME (Steam Injection) | Environmental
Region 1) Services
Bakersfield, CA
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478

‘Massachusetts . “|-AMS ‘Split Core. | -Art's oe ‘Monitoring and. Completed:

§ S ‘Sampler *.-|. Manufacturing:and ’|: Measurement 1999.2 ie
: f ‘Supply?! :
D

“Brian Anderson fates
800-635-7330 *.". -

‘Aquatic'Research' | Monitoring and”. |-Completéd «
‘| Instruments: Measurement ee :
Vapi wep F 3
Will Young’ ees
-| 208-768-2222 ‘ S

‘Anerobi¢-aerotie: |" Harding-Lawson' |: Denionstration
Bic iediation: ‘Engibners; MA’ < coe

‘Willard. Murray." ©
: : | 781-245-6606.
) Groveland, MA: || Deira Vac) Ine." “"] Demonstration Completed
po éeted Groveland WellsTM San Juan, PR: Pare: ee :
| Superfund Site : :| James Malot °°
Osean: © aS ; cee 787-725-8750 ;
‘|: New-Bedford, ‘Batch Organics’. | “CE.Systems. "| Demonstration: Completed’:
Region:T)-":. ‘Extraction Unit Corporation F . ee ere
fap Se 3 ‘Arvada CO! .
; occ) LV cBenningfield . | ee :
: ual [eeaeael os 303-420-1550: aera Bee
“New Bedford,MA ||. Solvent CF Systems” Completed
egion:1) ‘Extraction -:,." | Corporation 1988
eee : ee ‘Arvada,"CO® 7
he LV. Benningfield :

303-420-1550."



Demonstration Technology Contact Program : Status
Location .
St. Joseph, MI Submerged Allied Signal Demonstration Completed
. Aerobic Fixed Corporation :
Film Reactor Des Plains, IL
Steve Lupton

! 708-391-3500

| Mecinis &

| ‘bbs: BioTrol, Inc... |“Demonstration Completed © |
! ‘Superfind Site Eden Praitie, 9] | 1989
‘ ‘| New Bridges MN. MN. idk : aan
“| Region 5), oe Dennis Chileote:" ° -

612-942-8032,

‘| McGillis'& Gibbs
} Suipérfund Site
| New Bridge; MN -:
-|-Region’s)....:

co) Completed. |
Demonstration’: \.:.}.1989.

Biological ©." Completed

| McGillis& Gibbs :
Superfund ‘Site’! Aqueous; =: Eden Prairie,’ 1989
‘New Bridge, MIN ‘Treatment <2) | MN” patie

System”

‘|: Completed
‘1992 ¥

Soil Weshing/
Bislogical:
‘Treatment

Bio Versal’ USA)
oo.) Fairfax Stations’
LNA. :

‘| (Chatles Wilde’ "©

#081 703-250-3442
SHS) Mohsen Aimiran
108-827-0024

+) COGNIS

Ammunition Plant

B-13 ,



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location
Mississippi Brookhaven, MS Fungus US. Demonstration Completed
Brookhaven Wood Treatment EPA/NRMRL 1991
Preserving Technology USDA-Forest
(Region 4) Products Lab
Madison, WI
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Montana. Butte, MT Plasma Heat’ ~ ". ‘| Retech, Inc. Demonsiration. Completed: |
Butte-Silverbow Site : ‘Ukiah, CA”! I. 1991
Region 8) R.C. Eschenback a
707-462-6522
Butte, MT ‘Chemical . E&C Williams, ‘Demonstration Completed
(Region.8) Stabilization of ~ |.SC.".” : 2001
Mércury Mining , | Charlie Williams’
Waste | 843-821-4200 and,
Keeco, WA:
Amy. Anderson, :
By 888-977-9156 j
Mike Hotse Mine, MT ‘| Grouting: Morrison Knudsert::| Demonstration ‘Completed
Region 8) Tedhnique Corporation f 1996 :
Boise, ID,
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Rayrondi
208-386-6115 :
St. Louis, MT’ Anaerobic ER Simplot Demonstration Coinpleted”
Welldon Spring Biological ‘Company’ . . 1994
(Region 7) Destruction of Pocatello, ID, 5
. ‘TINT in'Soil ‘Tom Yergovich .
ee 209-858-2511 :
Nebraska Hastings, NE Spray Irrigation | University of Demonstration Completed
(Region 7) Nebraska- 1996
Lincoln Hasting,
NE
’ Ray Spalding
402-783-3931
Nevada. Battle Mountain, NV « :| Biodegradation : . |Pintail Systems; Demonstration: Completed
egion 9). "| of Cyanide, Ine. . 19983.
: Aurora, CO...
Caten Caldwell.
303-367-8443:
New Hampshire | Milford, NH Surfactant U.S. DOE. Duke | Demonstration Completed
Savage Superfund Site | Enanced Aquifer | Engineering ; 1999
(Region 1) Remediation G. Michael Shook

208-526-6945



MMT Program Areas of Interest

The Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies Program will continue to test and
evaluate in situ and ex situ field analytical
technologies, sampling techniques, and methods
for the determination of the chemical and
physical properties of hazardous waste sites. The
schedule of field demonstrations have kept pace
with the emergence of new technologies. Input
from clients and developers shows an ongoing
need to explore new applications which support
the goals of the SITE Program. In particular, there
remain many monitoring and measurement
technology needs including the detection and
Measurement of organic compounds in the
subsurface (particularly LNAPLs and DNAPLs).

Technologies are emerging that show
promise for DNAPL detection, but they may not
be ready for testing until 2003 or 2004. There is a
demand for non-invasive technologies that can be
used to detect the presence of contaminants in the
subsurface as well as to image the hydrogeologic
properties of sites. The detection and
measurement of mercury in soil has also been
identified as a technology area of considerable
interest. The MMT Program will be testing as
many as nine technologies which address this
need during FY02. The measurement of dioxin
has typically required that samples be analyzed in
fixed laboratories using prescribed, labor-
intensive analytical methods. During FY02,:a
survey was conducted to identify a number of
emerging technologies that may be used to detect
and possibly quantify the concentration of dioxin
in soil. Some of these technologies will be
considered for a field demonstration in FY03.

The use of biological test.kits which can .

determine the toxicity of environmental media
will also be considered for demonstration.
Biosensor and microelectronic devices represent
areas of intense research interest. The first
candidates from this class of technologies will be
ready for testing in FY04.

Since the program has matured, anumber
of developers in the area of X-ray
fluorescence and gas chromatography /mass
spectrometry have made significant
improvements in their technology and will be
candidates for abbreviated demonstrations
which will evaluate the improvements. These
demonstrations will be conducted in FY 03
and FY04.

Partnerships for Success
Federal to Federal Interface

The SITE Program will continue ‘to
recognize the importance of cooperation
between federal agencies to find common
areas of need and interest. Interfacing with
other federal agencies is an important aspect
of enhancing the benefits of technology —
demonstrations. It allows for leveraging
resources, expedited performance and cost
information exchange and cross fertilization
of technical expertise between agencies. In
addition, this type of collaboration encourages
the implementation of innovative approaches °
by federal end users in a more expedited
manner and, in many cases, implementation at
other non-federal site locations.

One example of shared interest is in
DNAPL contamination in the subsurface. It
is an environmental problem shared by many
of the member agencies of the Federal |
Remediation Technologies Roundtable
(FRTR). These agencies have a mutual
interest in finding cost-effective solutions to
the characterization, treatment and monitoring
of their DNAPL sites.

In 1997, NASA, DOE, EPA and DoD .
joined forces in forming the Interagency
DNAPL Consortium (IDC) in order to
evaluate a variety of DNAPL treatment
technologies at a site on Cape Canaveral,
Florida. These agencies, under the auspices
of the FRTR, believe that they should expand
on the concept of the IDC by formation ofthe ,
Federal DNAPL Technologies Initiative



CONTENTS

tion
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES

Electronic Information Sources .........-s se eeeee eee cet e eee eee eee eee rene Pee e ence ceeeeene eee ne D3

Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Sectors Demonstration Projects in North America, Second H
Edition and Database . D-3

Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information ( D-3 |
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Tenth Edition) EPA 542/R-01-004 D-3 '
EPA Technologies (EPA REACH IT). - : !
Site Remediation Technology Infobase. D-3 ;
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies . D-4
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and: Reference Guide, Version 3.0.
TechDirect.

Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations .............+0+0+5 Moc eee eeeee eet tree eeeeee Sv eeeeee D-4
EPA Library Network Program
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR)
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC) . D-4 i
Office of Research and Development (ORD) ........ D-4
Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) . D-5
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program . . DS
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (TRC)
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) ...............6+ See e cent eee e ence tenn ee ee ene nen ee eee D-5

SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES ......-- 020s secs eee eee recente teen eee ene ebene D-5

Electronic Sources of Information

EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory - Hazardous Waste

Site Characterization (on CD-ROM) (EPA 600-C-96-001) .....
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix . . .. D6
TechDirect . D6

Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations ...........6. see e eee eee eee e ene Jenene cence eee eens D-6 H
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology (CSCT) . uy .. D6 |

Environmental Technology Verification Program .
EPA Library Network Program ...........-
Office of Research and Development (ORD) .

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration. Program .
Technology Innovation Office (TIO)

C-2



Contents

Section Page

Notice 0.0.6... cece cece cece eee beeen cb ataees eee eee eee cnet e eee eens

Foreword
Figures and Tables .
Acronyms ........
Executive Summary ....... 00.000 Lecce eee e cece eee cnet eee eeeetaneenes eee eeete viii .

SITE Program Description ........5 0.00. occ eee cece cece cece een e teen eneeneenes
Introduction .........
Program Principles . .
Program Planning ......
Technology Field Demonstrations ...............000005
Information Dissemination ....... 00... cece c cece cece cece ence eeeeeeeeees

FY 01 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits
Promotion of Innovative Technologies fence erence eee tence eee eeeeeee
Historical Program Cost Savings and Vendor Contracting . .
Innovative Technology Highlights - - SITE Program Case Studies . .
Case Study 1: Iron Reactive Barrier (In-Situ Groundwater Remediation) ....
Case Study 2: MMTP - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) Measurement

ON RWW

Technologies ©... 2.0.6... eee e ence cece eee eee e nee e cee e eee e ene 10
Cast Study 3: Ex-Situ Harbor Sediment Remediation (New York/
New Jersey Harbor) ! 10

FY 01 Progress and Accomplishments ...... 00.0000 00 eeeeeeeeeeeeeccc ces teceeeeeee
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Program :

Future Direction.
Introduction vee -17
Technology Areas of Primary Interest . 17
MMT Program Areas of Interest .. . ~.20
Partnerships for Success ... . ..20
Information Transfer 2.2.0.0... eee eee ee cece eect een ee ne een eeeaeees 22

Conclusions .. sence nnn eee e eee nee e eee e eee 4.4622

Appendices

A - SITE Projects (Alphabetically by Developer State)

B - SITE Technology Demonstration Sites (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
C - Electronic Technical Information Resources

D - Glossary of Remediation Technologies





SITE Program participants who
responded indicated that they :
experienced up to an 800% increase in

sales as a result of their involvement in
the SITE Program. :

Case Study 1: Iron Reactive Barrier (In-Situ
Groundwater Remediation)

The U.S. EPA began’ working with the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 1995 to
characterize a contaminated groundwater plume
at DOE’s Rocky Flats site outside Denver, CO.
DOE is working to achieve closure of the Rocky
Flats site by 2006, and considers remediation of
this plume a crucial element of ‘site closure.
Based on the results of site characterization and
ongoing commitment to utilize innovative
treatment technologies, DOE decided to
remediate the contaminated groundwater
through use of a passive barrier.

Groundwater contamination in this area
originated from a former waste drum storage
area used by DOE in the late 1950s. Consisting
of shallow groundwater collected in'a French
drain and funneled to the reactors at a flow rate
of 0.5 to 2.0 gallons per minute, the plume
extends horizontally approximately 220 feet. Its
primary contaminants are uranium and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), including carbon
tetrachloride, tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene,
and vinyl chloride. Following excavation and’
removal of the contamination source in 1997,
the passive barrier (designed by EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.) was installed in the summer
of 1998. 7

Technology Description

This passive barrier system requires no
operational energy and minimal maintenance,
which results in a substantial cost savings over
use of an alternative pump and treat. system.
Performance assessment of the barrier indicates

_ that

the barrier system is removing
approximately 99% of the plume’s primary
contaminants.

This barrier system begins with the
downgrade-side collection of groundwater in a
subsurface hydraulic barrier (French drain) lined
with high-density polyethylene. The drain is
located in the unconfined aquifer at depths
ranging from 8 to 15 feet below ground surface.
Ground water is diverted through the drain to
piping that transfers it by gravity to the reactive
media treatment system. The system consists of
two 10-foot (wide) by 5-foot (deep) cylindrical
reactors in series, each of which contains 337
cubic feet of granular, reactive (zero-valent)
iron. The reactors were installed below surface
grade and were sized to treat groundwater at a
flow rate of 1 gallon per minute for a duration of
20 hours. In the reactors, VOCs are
dechlorinated to nonchlorinated hydrocarbons,
and uranium in the oxidized state (U%) is
converted to uranium in the reduced state (U**)
and precipitated. Following treatment, ground
water exits the barrier system directly through
surface water that flows to retention ponds.

Status

EPA and DOE have monitored the
influent and effluent of this barrier system on a
quarterly basis since September 1998. In
addition, water samples in 1-foot increments

throughout the reactive media have been

collected since project start-up to monitor
containment ' breakthrough. To date,

. breakthrough of VOCs and uranium has been

confined to the top 3 feet of the first reactor in
the treatment sequence.

Cost

The barrier system was installed at a cost
of approximately $4.7 million with an estimated
annual treatment cost of $130,776.. The total
cost of the barrier system (based on 20 years of
operation) is approximately $7.3 million.
Alternatively, a conventional pump and treat



ANSI/ASQC

DNAPL
DOD
DOE
ECOS
EPA
ESTCP
-ETV
FY
GPR
IDC
ITRC
MHI
MMT
NELP
NPL
NRC
ORD
PAHs
PCBs
REACHIT
RCI
SITE
TIO
TPH
VOC

Acronyms

American National Standard Institute, Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection and Environmental Technology Programs

Dense non-aqueous phase liquids

Department of Defense

’ Department of Energy

Environmental Council of States
Environmental Protection Agency

_. Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program —

Environmental Technologies Verification

Fiscal year

Ground penetrating radar

Interagency DNAPL Consortium

Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Monitoring and Measurement Technologies

Navy Environmental Leadership Program
National Priorities List

National Research Council

Office of Research and Development

Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated biphenyls

Remediation Characterization Innovative Technologies
White House Rapid Commercialization Initiative
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Innovation Office

Total petroleum hydrocarbon

* Volatile Organic Compound

vii



aboveground shoots. Phytoremediation may be applied in situ or ex situ, to soils, sludges,
sediments, other solids, or groundwater. ;

SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) is used to remediate the zone of soil which is
unsaturated with contaminated groundwater. A vacuum is applied to the soil to control the flow
of air and remove volatile and some semivolatile organic contaminants from the soil.

DUAL-PHASE EXTRACTION, also known as multi-phase extraction, uses a vacuum
system to remove various combinations of contaminated grovindwater, separate-phase petroleum
product, and vapors from the subsurface. The system lowers the water table around the well,
exposing more of the formation. Contaminants in the newly exposed unsaturated zone are then
accessible to soil vapor extraction. Once above ground, the extracted vapors or liquid-phase
organics and ground water are separated and treated.

SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION (S/S) reduces the mobility of hazardous
substances and contaminants in the environment through both physical and chemical means.
The S/S process physically binds or encloses contaminants within a stabilized mass. S/S is
performed both ex situ and in situ. Ex situ S/S requires excavation of the material to be treated,
and the resultant material must be disposed. In situ S/S uses auger/caisson systems and injector
head systems to add binders to the contaminated soil or waste without excavation, and the

. Tesultant material is left in place.

SOLVENT EXTRACTION uses an organic solvent as an extractant to separate organic
and metal contaminants from soil. The organic solvent is mixed with contaminated soil in an
extraction unit. The extracted solution is then passed through a separator, where the
contaminants and extractant are separated from the soil. Organically bound metals may be
extracted along with the target organic contaminants.

THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants and water
volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water and
organics to a gas treatment system. | :

THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY uses heat to increase the volatilization tate of
organics and facilitate extraction. Volatilized contaminants are typically removed from the
yadose zone using.soil vapor extraction. Specific types of these thermally enhanced recovery
techniques include Contained Recovery of Oily Waste (CROWTM), radio frequency heating,
conductive heating, steam heating, in situ steam stripping, hot air injection, dynamic

underground stripping, in situ thermal desorption, and electrical resistance heating. Thermally

. D3



<http://www fitr.gov/publications/infobse/98.html>.

Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies. The
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies is a joint
effort of Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable
members to publish case study reports on full- and
demonstration-scale remediation projects. As of June
2002, member agencies of the Roundtable have completed
313 cost and performance case study reports. The reports
(March 1995-June 2002) can be accessed by the Cost and
Performance Case Studies Search: ‘
<hittp:/bigisland.ttclients.com/frtr/search.html>.

Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and
Reference Guide, Version 3.0. The Remediation
Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide,
Version 3.0, prepared for federal agencies participating on
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR),
provides a “yellow pages” of remediation technologies
information. The guide is intended to assist remedial
project managers (RPM) to screen and evaluate candidate
cleanup technologies and select the best remedial
alternative(s) for contaminated installations, facilities, or
waste sites. The guide also assists environmental
professionals in gathering essential descriptive information
on the respective technologies. The guide incorporates
cost and performance data to the maximum extent available
and focuses primarily on demonstrated technologies.
However, information on emerging technologies also is
included in the guide. The guide can be accessed through
the Internet at </ttp:/Avww.frir.gov>.

TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA’s TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies is available through this Internet subscription
service. Once a month, the service distributes by electronic
mail a message describing the availability of publications
and announcements of events. For publications, the
message explains how to obtain a hard copy or how to
download an electronic version from the Internet.
Subscribe to TechDirect and view current and past versions
through the Internet at </ttp://clu-in.org>.

Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations

EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA’s Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library’s holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches

by author, title, or keyword. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
<http:/www.epa.gov/natlibra>,

Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable FRTR).
FRTR is an interagency working group that provides a forum
for the exchange of information regarding the development
and demonstration of innovative technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites. The forum also
synthesizes the technical knowledge that Federal Agencies
have compiled and provides ‘amore comprehensive record of
performance and cost of the technologies. Participating
agencies include DoD, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, DOE, the U.S. Department
of the Interior, and EPA. FRTR can be accessed through the
Internet at <http:/www.frtr.gov>.

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center (GWRTAC). GWRTAC was established through a
cooperative agreement between the National Environmental
Technology Applications Center (NETAC) of the Center for
Hazardous Materials Research (CHMR) and EPA. The goal
of GWRTAC is to compile, analyze, and disseminate
information about innovative ground-water remediation
technologies to industry, the research community,
contractors, government, investors, and the public. The
center currently is compiling information to be included in
databases of interactive case studies and vendor information
that will be available on the GWRTAC Internet site.
GWRTAC can be accessed through the Internet at
<http:/Avww.gwrtac.org>.

Office of Research and Development (ORD) is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of three
headquarters offices, three national research laboratories and .
two national centers, ORD is organized around a basic
strategy of risk assessment and risk assessment management
to remediate environmental and human‘health problems.
ORD focuses on the advancement of basic peer-reviewed
scientific research and the implementation of cost-effective,
common sense technology. Fundamental to ORD’s mission
is a partnership with the academic scientific community
through extramural research grants and fellowships to help
develop the sound environmental research necessary to
ensure effective policy and regulatory decisions. ORD also
implements such programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on
treatment technologies and EPA’s Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed through
the Internet at <http:/Avww.epa.gow/ORD/>.

Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF).
RTDF was established by EPA to foster public-private
partnerships that would conduct laboratory and applied
research to develop, test, and evaluate innovative remediation
technologies. RTDF’s home page provides.access to
information about various remediation technologies currently

C4



cost data, and quality assurance and quality standards also
are presented. The SITE Demonstration Program,can be
accessed through the Internet at.
<http:/www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE>.

i
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) TIO was
created in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies.
TIO’s mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To meet that mission, TIO has expanded
its focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process.. TIO has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the
state of both remediation and site characterization. For
additional information about TIO, contact Jeff Heimerman
of EPA’s TIO at (703) 603-7191. TIO can be accessed
through the Internet at

<hitp://clu-in.org/tiomiss.htm>.

C7



Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in FY 01

Laboratory East

Sontamiiants 0 orto draw

Developer Developer Technology Site Location |
Location

1 ‘| Argonne National: | “This projéet involves the phytoremediation of radionuélides and’: | ANIL Argonae

no 2) ‘solvents.’ Specifically, trees were ‘utilized to- degrade organic’, *

a ont of the # groundwater flow:

“| citernationall, Tne:

ML, MS Army Corps of —_| The purpose of the demonstration is to develop and refine a
Engineers protocol for beneficial reuse of dredged sediment. The process
consists of characterization of the site to determine the
contaminant concentration spatially and at depth, identifying
possible end users of dredged materials, and working with the
material until it achieves the appropriate quality for the intended
cA Gedkinetics’ || Pearl Harbor, HI

In Situ anerobic-aerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents.

Nationial Lab-East
Milwaukee, WI ia

Resources, Inc,

ill strip the TCH and the Vapor Revovery wells will collect the

J 'steam and TCE for separation and off-site: ‘disposal;

| MA. Hardirig-Lawson, Grafton, MA
Engineers Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) diffuses into groundwater
: passing through passive treatment wall. This acts as a base and
cometabolite for bioremediation.
“| Mntegrated Water

TX Micro-Bac This project involves two processes (Micro-Bac and X-19) for the | Goldwaithe,
International, Inc. | biological treatment of PCB’s. Products are mixed with the
contaminated soil to promote a reduction in PCB concentrations.
CA X-19 Biological
Products, Inc.
| Regenesis Bs
| eat ino groundwater passing through. passive’ Bs
treatment wall.; ‘This acts as a base an tabolite for! :
‘bioremediation; oa s a Bens
CA Steam Tech This project utilizes steam-enhanced remediation, which is an in Ridgefield, WA,
Environmental situ thermal treatment soil cleanup technology. ‘The technology
Services involves installation of a steam injection system and an

agressive vapor and liquid extraction system for the reduction of

15



SEPA ic: serait
The Superfund Innovative

Technology Evaluation
Program

Annual Report to Congress
_FY 2001

* SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION





SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State | ___Developer Technology Contact Program Status

Ohio U.S. EPA Risk Debris Washing ‘Michael Taylor . | Demonstration’ Completed 1990
(continued) Reduction System $13-782-4700 . :

Engineering :
Laboratory and IT
Corporation.
Cincinnati, OH

US. EPA Risk i William Slack Demonstration Completed 1992
Reduction i 513-469-6040 .
Engineering :

Alternate Cover Steve Rock’ - | atic Completed:2001
| Assessment 513-569-7149 .
Cincinnati, OH Progtam (ACAP)

Geo-Microbial Technology for Donald Hitzman | Emerging Completed 2001
Technologies, Metals Release and | 918-535-2281 | Technology
Ochelata, OK Removal from
Wastes

Metorex, Inc. ‘Field Portable X-' Jim Pasmore Monitoring and | Conipleted 1995
Bend, OR Ray Fluorescence’. "| 800-229-9209. |. Measuring’ eee
(FPXRE) 541-385-6748 . |. Fechnologies

Aluminum Bioscrubber PaulLiu Emerging Completed 1993
Company of 412-826-3711 | Technology
America (formerly

Alcoa Separations
‘Technology, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA.

Calgon Carbon Perox-Pur Chemical | Bertrand Demonstration Completed 1995
Oxidation Oxidation Dussert
Technologies 412-787-6681
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA

Center for Acid Extraction Stephe Paff Emerging Completed 1992
Hazardous Treatment System | 412-826-5321 | Technology
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA

Center for Organics BStephe Paff | Emerging Completed 1995
Hazardous Destruction and 412-826-5321 | Technology
Materials Research | Metals Stabilization | Brian
Pittsburgh, PA Bosilovich
412-826-5321



Program Planning

SITE Program direction and strategies are
evaluated each year based on input from the user
community and other private- and public-sector
stakeholders to ensure that the program continues
to focus on validating the most sought-after
remediation technologies. As part of the overall
program planning process, the SITE Program has
developed and is implementing a quality
management plan based on American National
Standard Institute, Specifications and Guidelines
for Quality Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection and Environmental Technology
Programs (ANSVASQC E4). This plan will
enable the program to focus more clearly on
long-term quality assurance and planning issues
that impact overall program performance.

Technology Field Demonstrations

SITE Program technology demonstrations
are increasingly conducted in partnership with
other EPA offices, other federal agencies, states,
private industry, and universities. These
partnerships reduce the overall costs of
demonstrations to EPA, accelerate remediation
of some of the most problematic sites at federal
and state facilities, and significantly subsidize
the technology vendors via site/logistical costs.

One example of interagency partnerships is with _

DOD, Navy at Pearl Harbor. This group is
currently working on a demonstration evaluating

technologies to remediate DNAPL at Pearl:

Harbor, Hawaii.

Innovative remediation and
monitoring/measurement technology
demonstration projects are presented by
developer state and by demonstration site state i in
Appendices A and B, respectively.

Information Dissemination

Electronic documents are accessible
through the Internet at the SITE Program web
page (http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE),

Environmental Technologies Verification

(ETV)web site http://www. epa.gov/etv/),

and site supported by the EPA Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response Technology
Innovation Office (TIO) (http://clu-in.org).
Several technology databases and
publications summarize information about
innovative treatment technologies and

’ associated vendors, and are useful tools in

identifying potential technology *
demonstration candidates or serve as
directories for technology vendors.
Descriptions of selected databases and
publication ordering information are
provided in Appendix C.

The following mechanisms are used
by the SITE Program to disseminate
information and increase interaction with the
user community:

° Program-specific brochures and
exhibits

. Conferences, workshops, and
technical working groups

. Publications and videotapes
(accessible on the Internet:

hittp://www.epa.gov/
ORD/SITE/document.html)

° Hard copies available from EPA’s
National Center for Environmental
Publications, 513-569-8190 or 1-
800-490-9192.

° Electronic media, including the
Internet

. Technical assistance to regions,
. states, and remediation contractors

. Technology seminars



SITE Program Description

Introduction
The SITE: Program is composed of a

Demonstration Program, a Monitoring and
Measurement Technology (MMT) Program, and
information transfer. SITE offers a mechanism
for conducting joint technology demonstration
and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites
through the involvement of the private sector,
EPA, and other federal and state agencies. It is
comprised of the following key elements:

v Demonstration Program

Evaluates and verifies performance ‘and reports

cost of promising innovative technologies at

selected hazardous waste sites to provide reliable

performance, cost, and applicability information

for site cleanup decision-making:

v Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Program '

Evaluates technologies that detect, monitor, and
measure: hazardous and toxic substances to
provide more cost-effective and accurate methods
for producing real-time data during site
characterization and remediation

v Information Transfer Activities
Disseminates technical information, including
engineering, performance, and cost data, to assist
in removing barriers for use of innovative and
alternative technologies

The Demonstration Program is the
flagship of the SITE Progiam. Its objective is to
conduct field demonstrations and high-quality
performance verifications of viable remediation
technologies at sites that pose high risks to
human health and/or the environment, are
common throughout a region or the nation, or
where existing .remediation methods are
inadequate, unsafe, or too costly. The SITE
Program solicits applications annually from

1

those résponsible for cleanup operations at
hazardous waste sites. A panel of SITE
Program scientists, engineers, and associated
environmental experts . reviews the
applications to identify those technologies
that best represent solutions for the most
pressing environmental problems. The
resulting data and reports are intended for
use by decision-makers in selecting
remediation’ options and for increasing
credibility in innovative applications.

The program is participating with
145 remediation technology vendors. The
SITE Program has successfully
demonstrated 137 technologies, including 16
during FY 01. Recognizing the need for a
shift from ex situ remediation, all of the
Program’s 12 ongoing demonstrations are in-
situ technologies. SITE’s Monitoring.and
Measuring Technologies (MMT) Program
has completed 45 projects to date, with 2
more in the planning stages.

The foundation of the SITE Program
is providing credible cost and

performance data.

Program Principles

The SITE Program is defined by the
following four operating principles: (1)
program planning, (2) matching priority sites
with innovative cleanup solutions, (3)
technology field demonstrations, and (4)
information dissemination.



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location

Clear Lake, CA Chemical Sevenson, W.C. Demonstration
(continued) Stabilization of Munster, IN

Mercury Mining | Steve Chisick
Wastes 219-836-0116

Clear Lake, CA Chemical E&C Williams Demonstration
Stabilization of | Summerville, SC | -
Mercury Mining | Charlie Williams

“Wastes 84-821-4200
Edwards AFB, CA CAV-OX Magnum Water | Demonstration
Region 9) ‘Oxidation Technology
Process El Segundo, CA
Dale Cox

; 310-640-7000

Fresno, CA Entrained-Bed | Texaco, Inc. Demonstration Completed
Selma Site Gasfication S. El Monte, CA 1994
Region 9) : John Wintor
310-908-7387
Fresno, CA ‘Silicate STC Omega Demonstration Completed
Selma Site Compounds by | (formerly Silicate |. 1990
Region 9) Solidification/ | Technology
Stabilizatioin Corporation)
: Scottsdale, AZ
Steve Pegler

602-948-7100

Fullerton, CA Excavation and | U.S. EPA Demonstration Completed
McColl Superfund Foam Region 9 1990
Site ‘Suppression of | San Francisco, CA
Region 9) Volatiles Jon Blevins
415-744-2400

Huntington Beach, Steam Injection’ | Hughes _ - Demonstration Completed
CA ‘Vacuum Environmental 1993
Rainbow Disposal Extraction Manbattan Beach,
(Region 9) (SIVE) CA

Wo longer a
vendor for SIVE)
‘ Paul De Percin

! U.S. EPA.

' 513-569-7797

Jackson, CA Biological Pintail Systems, | Demonstration Completed
Pintail Systems, Inc. | Stabilization of | Inc. 2000
(Region 9) ‘Arsenic in Soils | Aurora, CO

Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443

B-3



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued) |

Developer Technology a i

|| Minnesota BioTrol, Inc. : Methanotropic Durell Dobbins || Emerging Completed.1992 {
H (continued) Eden Prairie, MN | Bioreactor System. -| 612-942-8032 - | ‘Technology :
i} . =
H BioTrol, inc. ‘Biological Aqueous | ‘Durell Dobbins. | Demonstration | Completed 1989
| Eden Prairie, MN. -} Treatmient System. | 612-942-8032 coef |
| BioTrol, Inc. Soil Washing"! "| Dennis‘Chilcote Demonstration | Completed 1989 |
Eden Prairie, MN |} System =| 612-943-8032 : : i
| Membrane Membrane Gas Ctiaries Gantzer | Emerging Discontinued
} Corporation ‘Transfer in‘Waste | 612-378-2160.’ .'| Technology’, - 7
| Minneapolis, MN ‘Remediation’: ees ens | 3 i
| Missouri COGNIS Removal ofLead | LouMagdits | Demonstration | Completed 1994 |
| TERRAMET from Soils 573-626-3476 |
l Gross, MO . .
i - ae
}] Montana Montana College of: | Air-Sparged.---, | ‘Theodore Emerging ‘Completed 1994
| Mineral Science “| Hydrooyclone «| Jordan "| “Technology Ea
and Technology * : "8" Fh 6496-4112 fore nes eer '
Butte, MT : 406-496-4193." | aac ie ‘i |
Campbeil | ‘Gordon Ziesing | Emerging * Oiigsing : :
Centrifugal Jig ©“ |'406-496-1573. “| Technology = -./] 3".
Eo Ei. | 406-496-4103 © ie
Nebraska University of Spray Irrigation Ray Spalding | Demonstration | Completed 1996 |
Nebraska 402-483-3931
Lincoln, NE :
Nevada US. EPA. “| Field! Analytical Howard Fribush | Demonstration | Completa 1996 i
Las Vegas, NV Scteening Program|. 703-603-8831." ° °
: ASP) Lamy Jacke Pole . ‘
: 2 7022798-2373 : i
|| New Jersey Accutech Ine Pneumatic John Liskowitz | Demonstration | Completed 1992 |
Keyport, NJand | Fracturing 908-739-6444 |
New Jersey Extraction and Hot . |
Institute of Gas Injection
Technology
‘Newark, NI
ART International, | Low-Energy Werner Steiner} Emerging Completed 1994 |
Inc. Solvent Extraction | 201-627-7601 | Technology i
(formerly Enviro | Process
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech. Carver-Greenfield | Theodore Demonstration | Completed 1991
Corporation Process for Trowbridge
Somerville, NJ Extraction of Oily | 908-904-1606
Waste |

A-12 i



being designed, developed and evaluated through six active
action teams of RTDF including: the Bioremediation of
Chlorinated Solvents Consortium, the Permeable Reactive
Barriers Action Team, the Sediments Remediation Action
Team, the In-Place Inactivation and Natural Ecological
Restoration Technologies (INERT) Soil-Metals Action
Team, the Phytoremediation of Organics Action Team, and
the NAPC Cleanup Alliance. RTDF can be accessed
through the Internet at <hitp:/Avww.rtdf-org>.

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program.’ The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA’s Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for
the remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring
and measurement. Through the program, technologies are
field-tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering
and cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so
that potential users can assess the technology's applicability
to a particular site. Data collected during the field
demonstrations are used to assess the performance of the
technology, the potential need for pre- and post-processing
of the waste, applicable types of wastes and waste!
matrices, potential operating problems, and approximate
capital and operating costs. The collected information is
then provided in a Innovative Technology Evaluation
Report, Technology Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin.
These reports evaluate all available information on the
technology and analyze its overall applicability to other site
characteristics, waste types, and waste matrices. Testing
procedures, performance and cost data, and quality
assurance and quality standards also are presented. The
SITE Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at <http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE>.

Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC).
ITRC is a state-led coalition working together with
industry an stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance
of environmental technologies. ITRC consists of more
than 35 states, the District of Columbia, multiple federal
partners, industry participants, and other stakeholders,
cooperation to break down barriers and reduce compliance
costs, making it easier to use new technologies and helping
states maximize resources. Originating in 1995 from a
previous initiative by the Western Governors Association
(WGA). ITRC brings together a diverse mix of
environmental experts and stakeholders from both the
public and private sectors to broaden and deepen technical
knowledge and streamline the regulation of new
environmental technologies. ITRC accomplishes its
mission in two ways: it develops guidance documents and
training courses to meet the needs of both regulators and
environmental consultants, and it works with state
representatives to ensure that ITRC products and services
have maximum impact,among state environmental agencies
and technology users. ITRC technical work teams develop

guidance documents and both classroom and Internet-based
training courses to meet the information needs of regulatory
staff, technology vendors, and environmental consultants.
These products help state environmental agencies gain
valuable technical knowledge and develop consistent
regulatory approaches for reviewing and approving specific
technologies. State regulators lead ITRC technical teams,
which rely on broad-based participation from federal
agencies, industry, academia, and other stakeholders in
building collective knowledge and collaborative products.
ITRC can be accessed through the Internet at <hitp:/www.
itreweb.org>.

Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) TIO.was created
in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIO’s
mission is to increase the application of innovative treatment
technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils, and
groundwater. To meet that mission, TIO has expanded its
focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIO has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish many
of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources has led to
numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the state of both
remediation and site characterization. For additional
information about TIO, contact Jeff Heimerman of EPA’s
‘TIO at (703) 603-7191. TIO can be accessed through the
Internet at

<http://clu-in.org/tiomiss.htm>.

SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Sources of Information

EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory -
Hazardous Waste Site Characterization (on CD-ROM)
(EPA 600-C-96-001). The Hazardous Waste Site
Characterization CD-ROM, developed by NERL’s ESD-LV,
compiles guidance documents and related software to aid
environmental professionals in the complex,
multidisciplinary, characterizing of hazardous waste sites.
The CD-ROM is a compilation of computer programs related
to EPA’s RCRA and Superfund programs that can be printed,
as well as searched by key words. Using the CD-ROM
requires a personal computer with DOS Version 3.0 or
higher, 640K of Ram, and 3 MB of hard disk space. A math
co-processor is recommended but not required. The CD-
ROM canbe ordered on-line through the NTIS Internet site at
<www.ntis.gov>.

Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix. The
Matrix, developed by participating agencies of the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), is a matrix
and reference guide that is intended to provide users with an
understanding of the site characterization-technologies
available to them and the applicability of various
technologies to their particular problem(s). The Matrix

C-5



and will continue to be invited to participate in
SITE Program demonstration projects. Groups
choose to participate at a level required by the
objectives of the workgroup. Involvement of the
workgroups allows for better planning and
exchange of technical requirements early in the
planning of SITE projects.

Information Transfer

Information transfer is accomplished
through a number of mechanisms. While the
internet information distribution is an effective
mechanism, published documentation, meetings,
and conferences remain an essential part of
technical information dissemination.

Coordination with existing remediation
workgroups and programs is also essential. The
SITE Program continues to work cooperatively
with numerous programs, such as DOD’s ESTCP
Program, the Environmental Council of States
(ECOS) sponsored ITRC, and as stated previously
plans a much stronger technical relationship with
the DOE’s Office of Science and Technology.

ITRC Team meetings and special site
tours have been conducted near SITE Program
field demonstrations in order to capitalize on
multiple State participation. In FY 01, the SITE
Program, ITRC and NAVY, hosted a tour of Pearl
Harbor during the annual ECOS meeting. The
general purpose of the tour was to highlight the
ongoing partnership between SITE and the ITRC.
Approximately 40 people attended the tour.
Participants, included State Commissioners,
ECOS staff, EPA Regional Administrators,
members of Governor Whitman’s staff, Navy and
DOE officials. The tour highlighted several in-
situ and ex-situ demonstrations of innovative
technologies that have undergone or will undergo
SITE evaluation.

22

The program will continue pursuing
and-supporting the development of document
summaries in areas where data exists on a
variety of technologies or applications. The
information is useful in providing the user
community with comparative technical
information and costs within an area.
Documentation will continue for some time
since many of the technologies are in situ and
highly complex. In situ technology
evaluations are tested over varying lengths of
time, with a minimum time period of 3-6
months. Most are evaluated for one year. In
the case of biological treatment or in-situ
capping techniques demonstrations may span
2-3 years. The summaries will need updating
as the technologies mature and information
becomes available.

Conclusions

The SITE program is a key element in
EPA’s efforts to increase the availability and
use of innovative technologies for remediation
of the nation’s hazardous waste sites. The
SITE Program technology evaluations are
used by the remediation community to choose
cleanup technology options, and those data
are credible because of the rigorous quality
assurance and careful planning of the

- demonstrations. Some technologies once

considered innovative have been accepted as
standard in part because of this program.
Superfund site managers, who in 1986 had the
choice of incineration or landfilling, can now
find many other tools in the "remediation
toolbox." SITE continues to look to the future
for innovative solutions to solve the cleanup
challenges of the past. .

http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE


SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

Status __|

Developer Technology Contact Program
Concurrent Lead Smelting Brian Emerging Completed 1993
Technologies : Bosilovich Technology
(formerly Center : 412-826-5321
for Hazardous ‘
Materials Research) |
Pittsburgh, PA
MacTec-SPB In Well Vapor Mark Demonstration | Completed 1999
Technologies Stripping of Ground | McGlathery
Company Water 800-444-6221
|. Pittsburgh, PA
Geo-Con, Inc. In-situ Linda Ward Demonstration | Completed 1988
Monroeville, PA Solidification/ Robert Hayden
2Demonstrations _ | Stabilization 412-856-7700
Horsehead Flame Reactor Regis Zagrocki | Demonstration | Completed
Resource 610-826-8810
Development Co. :
| Inc. :
Monaca, PA
Lewis Soil Leaching TomLewis Il | Emerging Exited
Environmental Process 412-322-8100 | Technology
Services, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Strategic Immunoassay for | Craig Monitoring and | Completed 1993
Diagnostics, Inc. BCP Kostyshyn Measurement
Newtown, PA : 215-860-5115 | Technologies
ext. 634
Remediation Slurry David Nakles | Demonstration | Completed 1991
Technologies, Inc. | Biodegradation 412-826-3340
Pitsburgh, PA:
RE. Wright Bioventing, Air Richard Cronce | Demonstration | Completed 1992
Middletown, PA Sparging, 717-944-5501
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with state of
New York)
Roy F. Weston, Inc. | Thermal Desorption | Mike Cosmos | Demonstration | Completed 1992
West Chester, PA 215-430-7423
Roy F. Weston, Inc. | Steam Regeneration | John Emerging Completed 1995
West Chester, PA | Adsorption System - | Thoroughgood | Technology
(Ambersorb) | 610-701-3728
Deborah Plantz
215-537-4061

A-17



Program (FeDTIP). Our vision is for FeDTIP to
bea cooperative program with objectives broadly
focused on finding cost-effective technologies for
treating DNAPL contamination across a spectrum
of site conditions. i

The primary objectives of the FeDTIP are to:

+ Develop linkages among the many federal
DNAPL. science and technology activities
currently ongoing; the goal is to be
complementary rather than duplicative of these
‘activities. :

* Sponsor and . participate in technology
demonstrations and deployments at federal
DNAPL ‘sites representing a variety of site
conditions to gain cost and performance data.

* Identify the key science and technology issues
resulting from demonstrations and
deployments that must be resolved in order to
reduce costs and improve performance of
DNAPL site cleanup.

* Develop or participate in development of
technical practices and design guidance
manuals for key DNAPL technologies that will
become the standard for application at all
federal sites.

+ Develop an effective technology transfer
process for the benefit of the broader DNAPL
remediation and regulatory community.

To date, three technologies have been
demonstrated at Cape Canaveral Air Station
Launch Complex 34. The SITE Program will lead
the solicitation for new DNAPL sites during FY
02. New project selections and starts are
scheduled for FY 03. i :

Federal to State Interface.

Where there are’common environmental,
areas of interest, it is equally important to have
federal to state interactions as it is to have federal
to federal cooperation. Cooperation with
organizations such as the Environmental Council

21

of States (ECOS) and Interstate Technology
Regulatory. Council (TRC) promotes
partnerships and builds confidence within the
environmental community that proven
innovative technology can provide more-
effective and less-expensive environmental
protection.

The ITRC provides a mechanism to
interact with multiple state regulatory
agencies and state specific verification
programs. The ITRC is a state-led national
coalition dedicated to achieving better
‘environmental protection through the use of
innovative technologies.

ECOS champions the role of states in
environmental management and allows for the
exchange of ideas, views, and experience
among states. This year the waste committee
was working on a resolution to encourage
Federal support for interstate technology and
regulatory cooperation.. This resolution
specifically acknowledges the SITE Program,
for the demonstration of innovative
technologies and their associated cost savings.
The resolution was voted and signed
unanimously by all ECOS commissioners.

Direct interaction with multiple state
agencies provides many benefits. State
regulatory agencies are also faced with the
difficult. problems associated with hazardous
waste clean-up,’ and -the variation.’ of
regulations among states. Interaction among
multiple states on SITE projects can result in
multiple technical issues being addressed in
one field demonstration.. _ This reduces
duplication of field demonstrations to answer
one or more. state specific regulatory
questions.

The ITRC currently has several

. workgroups that crosscut the SITE Program’s

environmental priority areas of interest. The
various groups are as follows: 1) Permeable
Reactive Barrier Workgroup, 2) DNAPL’
Workgroup, 3) Phytoremediation Workgroup
4) Sediment Workgroup. These groups are


TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location L
Towa (continued) | Albert City, IA Dual Tube Liner | Art’s Monitoring and Completed |
. Qegion 7) Soil Sampler Manufacturing and | Measurement .
Supply :
American Falls,
D
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330 :
Albert City, IA EMELUX Soil _| Quadrel Services, | Monitoring and Completed .
Qegion 7) Gas Survey Inc. Measurement H
System MD :
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning : !
301-874-5510 '
Albert City, IA Gore-Scrubber | W. L. Gore and Monitoring and Completed
Q@egion 7) Passive Soil Gas : | Associates, Inc. ‘Measurement
. Sampler Elkton, MD
Ray :
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Albert City, IA JMC Clements Monitoring and Completed
Qegion 7) | Environmentalist’s | Associates, Inc. ‘Measurement
Subsoil Probe IA
Jim Clements i i
515-792-8285
Albert City, IA Large Bore Soil | Geoprobe Systems | Monitoring and Completed
Region 7) Sampler Salina, KS Measurement
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Kansas ‘Bendena, KS° } Biologiéal °°}! Eco'Mat Ine, Completed :
Region 7) Denitrification . 2000: E
we a ley fae
; u | 510-783-5885 2 ease i
Kentucky Paducah, KY In-situ Monsanto/Dupont Completed i
Gaseous Diffustion Electroosmosis | OH 1998
Plant of TCE inSoil/ | Thomas \ H
Region 4) Groundwaters Holdsworth i
“Lasagna” 513-569-7675
Process :
DOE- Paducah, KY | Oxidation and Vortec Demonstration Ongoing
. Vitrification Corporation .
Process Collegeville, PA
James Hnat
a

610-489-2255

B-10



Figures
Number
Superfund remedial actions: in situ technologies for source control
Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type
Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation 7
Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation

Share of 3,229 total contracts awarded to SITE demonstration vendors by
technology type

History of Ex situ vs In situ Distribution of SITE Demonstration Projects

Tables
Number
SITE demonstration projects completed in FY 01
SITE demonstration ongoing projects in FY 01

Future contaminant emphasis areas 2002-2007

SITE program projects FY 02 ..



FY 01 Progress and Accomplishments

Over the past 16 years, SITE has earned
increased recognition as a leader in advancing
innovative technology development and
commercialization and has participated
cooperatively with more than 145 technology
developers. Through FY 01, the SITE Program
has successfully demonstrated 137 technologies,
16 of which were demonstrated during FY 01.
These demonstrations have provided a
tremendous amount of information on the
performance, costs, and applicability of
innovative cleanup technologies, which greatly
assists managers of environmental remediation
projects in developing appropriate and effective
cleanup solutions. SITE has been responsive to
the user coramunity during this time, and has
recently focused on the need for in situ
remediation technologies to more cost-
effectively remediate sites. As shown in Figure
6,77 completed SITE projects have been ex situ
and 60 in situ, with a marked increase in
ongoing in situ technology demonstrations as
compared with ex situ since 1997. Each of the
12 ongoing or planned demonstrations are in
situ.

Field demonstration and evaluation of in
situ technologies may require several months or
years of data collection. This is in contrast to
field demonstrations of ex situ technologies
where field work can be completed in 1 to 3
weeks; thus, in situ techniques have higher
budget requirements. Based on the SITE
Program’s increased emphasis on in situ
technologies, the number of ongoing
demonstrations will likely increase, with fewer
moving from ongoing to completed status each

year than in the past. EPA estimates that six
field demonstrations will be completed each
year.

During FY 01, 16 new innovative
technologies were evaluated in the field.
Completed demonstration projects are listed in
Table 1, and ongoing projects are provided in
Table 2. All completed and ongoing projects
inthe Demonstration Program, ETP, and MMT
Program are listed in Appendices A and B.
The Emerging Technology Program (ETP) was
not described in this report because the ~
program was discontinued. ETP continues to
be a part of the Program’s history, however,
and in an effort to capture all projects
conducted by the SITE program, ETP projects ©
are listed in the appendices along with all other
SITE Program projects.



provides a general understanding of state-of-the-art
technologies for site characterization. The Matrix and
reference guide also enhances technology information
transfer and provides much needed comparison among
competing technologies. The Matrix can be accessed
through the Internet at <http:/Avww.frtr.gov/site>.

TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA’s TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies are available through this Internet
subscription service. Approximately once a month, the
service distributes by electronic mail a message describing
the availability of publications and announcements of
events. For publications, the message explains how to
obtain a hard copy or how to download an electronic
version from the Internet. Subscribe to TechDirect and
view current and past versions through the Internet at
<http://clu-in.org/membersh.htm>.

Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations

Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology
(CSCT). CSCT was established as one of 12 pilot projects
currently implemented by EPA’s Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The CSCT is a
partnership program among the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Defense
(@oD), and the U.S. Department of Energy. (DOE) that is
responsible for evaluating and verifying the performance of
innovative site characterization technologies. The CSCT
provides support to technology developers, evaluates and
verifies data generated during demonstrations, and
develops and disseminates information about the
performance of site characterization technologies. CSCT
can be accessed through the Internet at <http://clu-
in.org/esct.htm>. .

Environmental Technology Verification Program. The
ETV program seeks to provide credible performance data
on environmental technologies from independent third
parties under the auspices of EPA. It verifies the
performance of innovative technical solutions to problems
that threaten human health or the environment. Managed
by EPA’s ORD, ETV was created to substantially
accelerate the entrance of new environmental technologies
into domestic and international marketplaces. It supplies
buyers of technologies, developers of those technologies,
consulting engineers, states, and EPA regions with high-
quality data on the performance of new technologies. ETV
expands on past verification efforts, such as those
conducted under the SITE program for remediation
technologies. ETV currently implements 10 pilot projects,
including the Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology (CSCT). The ETV

program can be accessed through the Internet at
<http://www.epa.gov/etv>.

EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information from
EPA’s Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices, Research
Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout the country.
The Library Network provides access to its collection
through the On-line Library System (OLS), a menu-driven
database of the library’s holdings. The OLS provides users
with the ability to perform online searches by author, title, or
keyword. The material on OLS is updated every two weeks.
The EPA National Library Network Program can be accessed
through the Internet at <http:/Avww.epa.gov/natlibra>.

Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, Norine E. Noonan, Ph. D., is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of three
headquarters offices, three national research laboratories and
two national centers, ORD is organized around a basic
strategy of risk assessment and risk assessment management
to remediate environmental and human health problems.
ORD focuses on the advancement of basic peer-reviewed
scientific research and the implementation of cost-effective,
common sense technology. Fundamental to ORD’s mission
is a partnership with the academic scientific community
through extramural research gtants and fellowships to help
develop the sound environmental research necessary to
ensure effective policy and regulatory decisions. ORD also
implements such programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on:
treatment technologies and EPA’s Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies.. ORD can be accessed through
the Internet at <http:/Ayww.epa.gov/ORD/>.

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration

program was established by EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and .

Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for the

. remediation of hazardous waste sites, arid monitoring and

measurement. Through the program, technologies are field-
tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering and cost
data are gathered on the innovative technology so that
potential users can assess the technology's applicability to a
particular site. Data collected during the field demonstrations
are used to assess the performance of the technology, the
potential need for pre- and post-processing of the waste,
applicable types of wastes and waste matrices, potential
operating problems, and approximate capital and operating -
costs. The collected information is then provided in a
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report, Technology
Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin. These reports evaluate
all available information on the technology and analyze its
overall applicability to other site characteristics, waste types,
and waste matrices. Testing procedures, performance and

C-6



Appendix B

SITE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES
(Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)

B-1



EPA Sources of Information on
Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies

Listed below are U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sources of information on Innovative Remediation
and Site Characterization Technologies. Sources of information include: electronic information sources in the form of
-databases or Internet sites, as well as programs, partnerships and organizations accessible on the Internet.

REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Information Sources

Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Scale
Demonstration Projects in North America, Second
Edition and Database. The searchable database contains
information about 600 completed innovative technology
field demonstration projects in North America. The
purpose of the database is to consolidate key information
from innovative demonstration projects into a single source
and present that information in a format that enables the

user to easily identify innovative technologies that may be ©

appropriate to the user’s particular site remediation needs.
The database, which is limited to completed demonstration
projects and a small number of full-scale cleanup efforts,
does not include emerging technologies or laboratory-scale
projects, A summary report, EPA 542-B00/004 of the,
same name is available from EPA’s National Service
Center for Environmental Publications or accessed free of
. charge from the CLU-IN Internet site at <http://clu-
- in.org/products/nairt>.

Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN)
Home Page. CLU-IN is a streamlined source of
information about innovative remediation and site
characterization technologies for hazardous waste cleanup
professionals. It provides access to information about
programs, organizations, publications, and other tools for
EPA and other Federal and State personnel, consulting
engineers, technology developers and venders, remediation
contractors, researchers, community groups, ‘and individual
citizens. Access to various pools of information is
presented in the form of downloadable publications and
databases. Sources of additional information on the
Internet also are presented through a series of links. CLU-
IN is sponsored by EPA’s Technology Innovation Office
(TIO). For additional information about the CLU-IN home
page, call (301) 589-5318. CLU-IN can be accessed
through the Internet at <fitp://clu-in.org>. H
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (Tenth Edition) EPA/542/R-01/004 This report
contains information about remedies selected at
contaminated waste sites. The sites include Superfund
remedial and removal sites and some non-Superfund sites
being remediated by the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), or under
the RCRA corrective action program. The EPA REACHIT

online system (see description) includes such site-specific
data as contaminants and media treated, project status, and
site contact. If you have questions or comments about the
system, please call EPA’s TIO at (301) 589-5318.. The report
can be downloaded free of charge from the CLU-IN Internet
site at <http://clu-in.org/asr>. To obtain a copy of the
report, call EPA’s National Service Center for Environmental
Publications at (800) 490-9198 or (513) 489-8190.

EPA Remediation and Characterization Innovative
Technologies EPA REACH IT). EPA REACH IT,
sponsored by EPA’s Technology Innovation Office, is anew
system that lets environmental professionals use the power of
the Internet to search, view, download, and print information
about innovative remediation and characterization
technologies. EPA REACH IT provides information about
more than 650 service providers that offer almost 1,300
remediation technologies and more than 180 characterization
technologies. EPA REACH IT combines information from
three established EPA databases, the Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT), the
Vendor Field Analytical and Characterization Technologies
System (Vendor FACTS), and the Innovative Treatment

" Technologies (ITT), to give users access to comprehensive
information about treatment and characterization
technologies and their applications. It combines information
subrhitted by technology service providers about remediation
and characterization technologies with information from.
EPA, the U.S, Department of Defense (DoD), the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), and state project managers
about sites at which innovative technologies are being
deployed. EPA REACH IT can be accessed through the
Internet at <http:/Avww.epareachit.org>. It is best viewed.
using Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer,
version 4.0 or higher.

Site Remediation Technology Infobase. The Site
Remediation Technology Infobase was founded by EPA and
prepared for the federal agencies participating in the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable. It provides
information on federal cleanup programs; federal site
remediation technology development assistance programs,
and databases; federal electronic resources for site
remediation; other electronic resources for site remediation
technology information; a bibliography of selected federal
publications on alternative and innovative site remediation
technologies; technology survey reports; and technology
program contacts for DOD, DOE, and EPA. It can be
accessed through the Internet at:

C-3



SEPA

United States
Environmental Protection

Agency

National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300

EPA/S40/R-03/502
March 2003

'

Please make all necessary changes on the below label,
detach or copy, and return to the address in the upper
left-hand corner.

If you do not wish to receive these reports CHECK HERELI ;
detach, or copy this cover, and return to the address in the
upper left-hand comer.

i
|

PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
EPA
PERMIT No. G-35



Appendix D

GLOSSARY OF REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES

D-i





TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State

Demonstration
Location

Technology Contact

Program

Florida
(continued)

Hialeah, FL
General Electric
Service Shop

In-situ Geo-Con, Inc.

Solidification/ | Monroville, PA
Stabilization Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700

Demonstration

Pensacola, FL
American Creosote
Works

Region 4)

SBP
Technologies, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Clayton Page
504-755-7711

Demonstration

Pensacola, FL
Escanbia Wood
Preserving Site
Region 4)

Soil Washing U.S. EPA Mobile
‘Volume Reduction
Unit

Cincinnati, OH
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629

Demonstration

Petroleum Products
Corporation
Miami, FL

Oleofilter North American
Technologies
Aprotek

San Ramon, CA
Cathryn Wmberly
916-366-6185

Chickamuga, GA and
Hopkinsville; GA
(Region 4)

Co OS EPA

Citicinnati, OF
‘Mike Taylor’
512-782-4700;

Deinonstration

Warner Robins, GA’. .

Robins AFB
(Region 4)

Stabilization of .:' | WASTECH, Ine!
Organics : °°" | Oak Ridge, TN
a - =| Benjamin Peacock
“615-483-6515,

Completed:
1991.

Pearl Harbor, HI
Region 9)

PCB/Metals EET Inc.
Extraction from Bellaire, TX
Porous Surfaces Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727

Demonstration

Completed
1997

Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
Region 9)

Electrokinetics Geokinetics
CA

Steven

Clark
510-704-2940

Demonstration

Completed
2000

Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)

Electrokinetic |! Geokinetics and
Flushing & Duke Engineering
Surfactant TX

Flushing Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Harry Linnemeyer
512-425-2000

Demonstration



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technology Contact Program Status
Connecticut Dexsil Corporation | Environmental Test | Jack Mahon Monitoring and} Completed 1993
Hamden, CT Kits PCB) Chior- | 203-288-3509 | Measurement
4 demonstrations | N-Soil Technologies
12000 .
PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
University of Permanganate/ George Hoag | Demonstration | Ongoing
Connecticut Persulfate 860-486-2781
Oxidation
Treatment for PCE
Sie z

Membrane |’: | Emest Mayer. | Demonstiation’ “| ‘Completed 1990

‘Microfiltration. 302*774-2277

‘Hewlett ring ‘Completed 1992'l}
‘Packard “| “Measurement “ Y
:800-227:9770''.: | “Technologies
‘Bob Belai ae %
302+633-8487.
Florida Immunoassay for Tim Lawruk Monitoring and | Completed 1993
Diagnostics Inc. PCP 800-544-8881 Measurement
(formerly Ensys, - 302-456-6782 | Technologies
Inc.)
‘Newark, DE
Funderburk and Dechlorination and | Ray Funderburk | Demonstration Completed 1997
Associates Immobilization 800-723-8847
Apollo Beach, FL :
High Voltage High-Energy William Cooper | Emerging Completed 1993
Environmental Electron Irradiation | 910-962-3450 Technology
Applications, (Aqueous)
Inc./Florida
International ' Demonstration Completed 1994
University and ‘
University of
Miami, FL :
High Voltage High Energy William Cooper | Emerging Completed
Environmental Electronic Beam 305-593-5330 Technology
Applications, Inc. | (Solids)
Miami, FL
PCP, Inc. Ton Mobility Martin Cohen Monitoring and | Completed 1991
| West Palm Beach, Spectrometry 407-683-0507 Measurement
FL ' . Technologies
Geoigia! 9/4] American’:’ | PYRETRON “| Giegory Gitman.| Demonstration:.| Completed 1988
ee “| Comibustion, Inc. ‘Thermal © 1-404-564-4180 ae pe
Norcross, GA =: ‘Destruction. panne age



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

Contact

State Demonstration ‘Technology Program Status |
Location
Washington Ellensburg, WA Anaerobic J.R. Simplot Demonstration Completed
(Region 10) Biological Company July
Destruction of | Pocatello, ID 1993
Dinoseb in Soil__| Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Whatcom Waterway | Electrochemical | Weiss Associates | Demonstration Ongoing
Bellingham, WA Geooxidation Joe Lovenitti
Ridgefield, WA Steam Enhanced | Steam Tech Demonstration Ongoing
(Region 10) Remediation Environmental :
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Fox River, WE } Thermal ? Denicnstration”’ | Completed
a (Region's)... ‘ ‘Sediment Reuse:.”:|'Terry'Carroll 2001
Pee | Technology 920-727-1411,"
“| Green Bay, WE: AMS Split-Core’. (| Art’s Monitoring and. «|. Completed:
© Region '5) ; Sampler)". | Maniifacturing and |’ Measutement © 1999
: sg Pete ‘Supply: 4 . :
De:
i : Brian:Anderson
800-635°7330 :
Green Bay, WI | Russian Peat’. | “Aquatic Research | Monitoring and” |. Completed
(Region 5) : Borer)! » | Instrumients*::.: Measurement. oy
7 Will Young:
ae 208-768-2222 :
“MAECTITE®:: | Sevenson Demonstration... |Completed.
| Treatment’ Environmental’ : : 2000.2".
: Process. Services, Inc.. oe
Region's)... vies “o}-Munster, IN (23.2
: So Chuck McPheeters
j ° : 2 1 219-836-0146 :
“| Yones Island CDE." | Phytoremediation | Army Compsof . | Demonstration. | Ongoing
8] Milwaukee, WE io ecs[o5 oo) Engineers’ ae Pee
FP Region 5)" on fs (Vicksburg, MS :
ees and Detroit MD)
Various locations | 10 sites around the Alternate Cover | U.S. EPA Demonstration Completed
inUs. nation Assessment NRMRL 2001

Program (ACAP)

B-21



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer ‘Technology Contact Program Status
Georgia ETG., Inc. Long-Path Fourier. || Orman Simpson '| Monitoring.and" | Completed 1992
(continued) Norcross, GA Transform Infrared. «| :404-242-0977 Measurement

Spectrometer : ‘Technologies
Sonotech, Inc. Frequency Tunable.”| Ben Zinn Demonstration’ ‘'/' Completed 1995
Atlanta, GA Pulse Combustion 404-894-3033 . .
System :
Williams Soil Washing S. Jackson Emerging Exited 1992".
Environmental Hubbard: -». Technology
Services, Inc. (U-S. EPA)
(ormerly Harmon, 513-569-7507;
Environmental
Services, Inc.),”,
Stone Mountain,
GA ~
Idaho Aquatic Research Sediment Core Will Young Monitoring and | Completed
Instruments Sampler 208-768-2222 Measurement
Aquatic Research Russian Peat Borer | Will Young Monitoring and | Completed
Tnstruments 208-768-2222 Measurement
Technologies
Argonne National Phytoremediation Scott Lee Demonstration Ongoing
Laboratory West of Radionuclides 208-533-7829
Idaho Fall, ID
Art’s AMSTM Dual-Tube | Brian Anderson | Monitoring and | Completed
Manufacturing and | Liner SoilSampler | 800-635-7330 Measurement °
Supply Technologies
AMSTM Split Core | Brian Anderson | Monitoring and | Completed 1999
Sampler 800-635-7330 Measurement
Technologies
IR. Simplot Co. Anaerobic Russell Kaake | Emerging Completed 1993
Pocatello, ID Biological Process 208-235-5620 Technology
Anaerobic Tom Yergovich | Demonstration Completed 1994
Biological Process 209-858-2511
Morrison Knudsen | Grouting Technique | Kathryn Levihn. | Demonstration | Completed
Corp/STG Rick Raymondi
Technologies 208-386-6115
Boise, ID
Process Photolytic Michael Swan Demonstration Exited
Technologies, Inc. Destruction of SVE | 208-385-0900
Boise, ID off-gases
U.S. DOE/ Duke Surfactant Michael Shook | Demonstration Completed 1999
Engineering Enhanced Acquifer | 208-526-6945
Lockheed, ID Remediation
Illinois Allied Signal Submerged Aerobic ‘Steve Lupton Demonstration’ ‘Completed:
Corporation Fixed Film Reactor . | 708-391-3500
Des Plains, IL



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location
Livermore, CA. Chemical Calgon Carbon Demonstration
Lawrence Livermore Oxidation Oxidation
National Laboratory Perox-Pure Technologies
(LLNL) (formerly
(Region 9) Peroxidation
fl Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Livermore, CA. In-situ Enhanced | Berkley Demonstration Completed
LLNL Extraction Environmental 1993
(Region 9) Restoration
i (formerly Udell
Technologies,
Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
March AFB, CA Tn well ‘Air Roy Weston Demonstration Completed
(Region 9), Stripping Woodland Hills, 1994
CA
Jeff Bannon
818-971-4900
Port Hueneme, CA Solvated Electron | Commodore Demonstration Completed
Naval Facilities Treatment of Environmental 1996
Engineering Service Chlorinated Columbus, OH.
Center Organies Neil Dronby
Qegion 9)’ 614-297-0365
Redding, CA Precipitation, EPOC Water, Inc. | Demonstration Completed
Tron Mountain Microfiltration, Fresno, CA 1993
Superfund Site Sludge Scott Jackson
Dewatering 209-291-8144
Sacramento, CA Photolytic Process Demonstration. Exited
McClellan AFB Destruction for Technologies, Inc.
Region 9) SVE Off-gases | Boise, ID
. . ‘Michael Swan,
208-385-0900
Sacramento, CA ~ Groundwater Xerox Two Phase | Demonstration Completed
McClellan’ AFB Extraction Extraction 1995
Region 9) Webster, NY
: Ron Hess
716-422-3694
San Diego, CA Circulating Bed General Atomics Demonstration Completed
. Cumbuster (formerlt Ogden. 1989
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
B-4



liquids (LNAPLS), and dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLS), all of which can potentially
move in different directions. As the complexity of
the geological formation increases so does the
need for innovative technologies to treat or detect
non-aqueous phase contamination in groundwater.
New technologies are needed to control and
remediate this widespread problem.

In addition to groundwater contamination,
The SITE Program continues to place priority on
evaluating technologies for treatment of metals
and/or recalcitrant organic compounds in soil. In
situ technologies for either soil or groundwater
continue to remain a priority for the SITE

Program.

Because of technical difficulties related to
sediment remediation, this is another area where
the remediation community would benefit from
mew processes, approaches or. less-expensive
methods for treatment. In situ treatment,
sampling and containment are technology areas of
interest that will be addressed in the future.

More recently there have been significant
technology breakthroughs in chemical conversion
methodologies. Technologies that rely on
chemical conversion of the contaminant species
rather than destruction or stabilization will end the
remediation process at treatment. Metal enhanced
dechlorination or treatment barriers fall into this
category. This technology is a groundwater
treatment technique that degrades chlorinated
volatile organics (VOCs): using an
electrochemical process that oxidizes granular
iron while reducing and dechlorinating VOCs.
Two methods of in-situ metal enhanced
dechlorination have been developed: ‘in situ
permeable treatment trenches (including funnel
and gate configurations) and reactor vessels
containing granular iron and located in the
subsurface. In the future, material other than iron

18.

will be assessed for effectiveness on VOCs
and other groundwater contaminants.

The SITE Program emphasizes the
need for technologies capable of in situ
remediation of dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) in difficult geological
formations. This continues to be a theme
through the remediation community as a
whole. The program continues to evaluate in-
situ thermal and chemical oxidation type
technologies under a broad array of geological —
conditions. In addition, effective remediation
technologies for metals in soils, treatment of
recalcitrant compounds, and the general need
for in-situ treatment remain high on the
priority list.

The SITE Program will also continue
to emphasize the need for technologies that
focus more on types of contaminated sites
rather than single contaminants (i.e., wood
preserving sites, manufactured gas plant
sites). Most sites are not contaminated with a
single contaminant, but with mixtures
including by-products formed from normal
degradation. Recent applications have lead
the SITE Program to move in this direction.
Based on the multi-agency review board, a list
of new areas are:

Sediments

Mining Issues\Acid Mine Drainage
Manufactured Gas Plants

Wood Treating\Preserving

Pesticide Manufacturers\Formulators

oe ewe

Table 3 outlines the future
contaminant areas of interest, and Table 4
describes the demonstrations that are planned
for FY 02.





TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location .

Pearl Harbor, HI Set Process for Commodore Demonstration Completed
(continued) ‘Naval Facility PCBs in Soil Advanced : 2000
. - | Region 9 ‘ Sciences, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Pearl Harbor, HI Closed Loop Geokinetics CA Demonstration Ongoing
Naval Facility Lead Recovery | Stephen Clark :
(Region 9 ‘ 510-704-2940
“| SAberjona’River.\)....° | Sediment Core | Aquatic'Research’ | Monitoring and." | Completed

Sampler: IDE Ss
Eee Will Young

“:/ Measurements
(208) 768-222

‘Phytoremediation "|: Argonne National. | Demonstration’ ‘Ongoing
Laboratory. : :
‘West Idaho Fall;

Ds

Scott Lee: : fe
(208) 533-7829. feo Spe

Illinois Chicago, IL Hydraulic U.S. EPA/ Demonstration Completed

Region 4) Fracturing 1992

Cincinnati, OH

William Slack

513-469-6040
Elgin, IL Matcon Modified | Wilder Demonstration Completed
Region 5) & Asphalt Cap Construction 2001
Dover, DE - Co, WA
Region 3) W. Randall Garrett

800-484-9404
Waukegan Harbor, IL | Thermal SoilTech, ATP Demonstration Completed
(Region 5) Desorption Systems Inc. 1992

: Porter, IN ,
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Solvent =i "| Joniies/Résources'”] Demonstration ‘Completed * "|
i ic : 1992: :

“Extraction,

oso SBA Rings 250 p. Rane fos
Si 21 206-828-24000 2p yee ee

Towa Albert City, IA Core Barrel Soil’ | Simulprobe Monitoring and | Completed

Region 7) Sampler Technologies, Inc. | Measurement

CA

Richard Laton
83-8787



Notice

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and
Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under our contract
No. 68-C-00-186 to Environmental Quality Management, Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency’s
peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation
for use.



‘SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

: i ; Completed 1998
oS ‘Wright Paterson | of T "513-255-1716 : :
Dayton, OH

“4 Saboek and Wileox.| ‘cyclones 2)" | Tiawrenee King iiition’ “| \Coinpleted 1991
i : © /236:829-7576 :

Satyz “2 Completed
| 614-424-4812 * ees

Completed

-Coitiplet

Douslas Jerder’ "| Emerging’ - ‘Completed 1998
423-690-3211 ‘ i :

‘| Services'Corp) - |
“Rindlay, OH

Completed 1998

University of: .°|/ Phot : Emerging, | Completed 1994
Dayton Researth’ < ohn Graham’ “

USEPA Mobilé. | Soil Washing | ‘Richard Griffith | Demonstration _|-Completed 1992
Voliime Reduction | ae ‘ : is A I

Paul’ McCauley “|: Demonstration’ ‘| Gompleted 1997
‘| sigseb-raaan [oc es Bo

Dewionstration | ‘Completed 1993

{and ETS

Environmeital whe |: 513-569- 7341

| .Cinciniati, OH *, of 92 -¥eb-Shong
ope : “Shieh

215-832-0700:



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

‘Technology Contact Program Status
New Jersey Geotech Cold Top William Demonstration | Bxited
(continued) ‘Development ° - |. Vitrification Librizzi :
Corporation : 201-596-5846
‘Newark, NJ i Thomas Tate
* | 610-337-8515
Envirogen; Inc. Microbial Ronald" _ | Demonstration | Completed 2000
Lawrenceville, NI__| Degradation/ Unterman
Solvent Extraction | (609) 936-9300
ML. ENERGIA, | Reductive Photo- | Moshe Lavid | Emerging Completed 1995
Tne. Dechlorination 609-799-7970 | Technology
Princeton, NJ Treatment -
ML. ENERGIA, — | Reductive - | Moshe Lavid | Emerging Completed
Tne. Photo-Thermal 609-799-7970 | Technology
“Princeton, NJ Oxidation Processes
for Chlorocarbons
New Jersey Pneumatic. John Schuring | Emerging Completed 1992
Institute of Fracturing/ 201-596-5849 | Technology
Technology, Bioremediation David Kosson :
Hazardous jl 908-445-4346
Substance’ ” i
‘Management
Research Center
‘Newark, NI :
‘New Jersey Cold Top William Demonstration | Exited
Institute of Vitrification Librizzi
“Technology 201-596-5846
‘Newark, NJ and j ‘Thomas Tate
GeoTech : 610-337-8515
‘Development
Corporation
King of Prussia, PA
New Jersey GHEA Associates | Itzhak Gottlieb | Emerging Completed 1992
Institute of Process 201-226-4642 | Technology
Technology :
Newark, NI
Phytotech, Inc. Phytoextraction of | Burt Ensley Demonstration | Completed 1998
Monmouth, NI metal from soil 908-438-0900
Sentex Sensing Portable Gas Amos Monitoring and | Completed 1992
Technology, Inc. Chromatograph Linenberg Measurement
Ridgefield, NJ 201-945-3694 | Technologies
Solucorp Molecular Bonding | Robert Kuhn Demonstration | Completed
~__| Saddle Back, NI System 914-623-2333
| New Mexico.” : | Billings. “Subsurface. '; > ‘Gale Billings |’ Demonstration’:
ae Associates, Inc. . ,:,| Volatilization an 505-345-1116). 3]. eis
Albuquerque; NM.’ -|;Ventilation’System: | Don Bienneman’ | °°
CEE ERCEE REL : “df 713067625324

A-13



Demonstration
Location

Technology

Contact Program Status

Massachusetts. North Dartsmouth, ‘Thermal OHM... Demonstration. Completed 1
(continued) MA Désorption’ Environinental : 1992.
Resolve Superfun 1) Cormerly > : !
Site : 2 ‘Chemical Waste i H
(Region 1) ‘ ‘Management Inc) |: {
. Lonibarda, IL :
Dick Ayen us * :
803-846-2413 Tbe oe
Michigan Adrian, MI Thermal Roy F. Weston, Demonstration. Completed
Anderson. Desorption Inc. 1992
Development (physical) ‘West Chester, PA
Qegion 5) Michael Cosmos H
215-430-7423
Bay City, MI Thermal Gas ELI Eco Logic Demonstration Completed. |
Bay City Municipal Phase Reduction | International, Inc. 1992
Landfill Process and Rockwood, i
(Region 5) Thermal Ontario, H
Desorption Canada H
Jim Nash
519-856-9591 }
Buchanan, MI Subsurface Billings & Demonstration. Completed
Electro-Voice Volatilization Associates, Inc. 1994
(Region 5) and Ventilation | Albuquerque, NM i i

System (SVVS) | Gale Billings
505-345-1116

Detroit, MI Debris Washing | U.S. EPA/ Demonstration Completed {
Region 5) System NRMRL 1990
Cincinnati, Obio
», | Donald Sanaing
513-569-7444 i

t
Essexville, MI - Sediment Soil Bergmann, USA. Demonstration Completed

Saginaw Bay Washing Gallatin, TN 1992
Confined Disposal George Jones
Facility 615-230-2217
Qegion 5) i
Grand Ledge, MI In-situ Geosafe Demonstration Completed
Parsons Chemical Site | Vitrification Corporation 1994
Qegion 5) Richland, WA :

James Hansen

509-375-0710

Rose Township, MI | Infrared Grupo Italimprese | Demonstration Completed
(Region 5) Incinerator (cova Europa) : 1987
(formerly
ECOVA)
Jon Cioffi
206-883-1900

B-12



Program. The data compiled by the SITE
Program allowed environmental managers to
compare innovative technologies to
conventional technologies (i.e. pump and treat
technologies, incineration and excavation and
land filling), especially with updated data on
a total of 195 RODs that selected innovative
technologies for part or all of the remediation.
As the innovative‘ technologies discussed in
this report become more accepted and used as
the baseline for remediation, they will be
viewed as conventional technologies. for
comparison to newer technologies. The SITE
program will periodically evaluate whether
technologies that are no longer considered
innovative should be added to the baseline of
conventional technologies. The Program will
conduct this review in FY 2002 and thereafter
on a five year basis.

EPA guidance recommends that ROD
estimates assess remedial alternatives with an
accuracy of +50 percent to-30 percent. Of the
195 RODs that selected innovative
technologies, 98 had sufficient information to
make a cost comparison between the selected
technology and a conventional technology.
Cost savings realized by using innovative
technologies for the 98 RODs was estimated
at $2.6 billion in 2000 dollars, with an average
percent savings per site of 72 percent. Only 13
of the 98 RODs reported that the innovative
technology was more expensive than or equal
to the established technology.

To estimate SITE Program net
benefits, the FY 93-99 RODs and the SITE
Program budget were inflated to the end of
2000 using Consumer Price ‘Index. (CPI)
inflation figures. The total “inflated” cost
savings for RODs dated 1993-1999 was $2.6
billion, and the total inflated SITE Program
budget from 1986-2000 was $ 181 million.
This comparison represents an estimated
inflated cost savings of over $ 2.4 billion for
various site cleanups.

Figure 2 shows a breakdown of savings by
technology type. Soil vapor extraction (SVE)
showed the highest savings of over $1.25 billion,
followed by $517 million for bioremediation.
SVE was one of the initial technologies accepted
into the SITE Program (in the late 1980s), and
large savings would therefore be expected from
this technology. Solvent extraction, thermal
desorption, and vitrification each accounted for
over $100 million in savings. Phytoremediation
and. permeable reactive barriers are newer
technologies that are beginning to be chosen in
RODs, with five and four sites having specified
their use, respectively, with an associated cost
savings of $76 million as. compared to
conventional technologies. The number of sites
and associated costs savings for phytoremediation
and treatment barrier sites are expected to increase
rapidly in coming years.

Historical Vendor Benefits

_ Technology vendors are a central part of
the SITE Program, providing remediation services
for sites requiring clean-up solutions. Vendors
experience various benefits by participating in the
SITE Program, namely increased exposure,
market share, technical acceptance, and
recognition. Increased acceptance of innovative
technologies is demonstrated by the level of
commercial activity experienced by SITE Program
vendors. For example, 1999 information
indicated that since completing SITE
demonstration projects, vendors received 1,921

-remediation contracts, and 1,308  treatability

studies (Figure 3). 2001 vendor information was
not available at the time of submission of this
report. This information will be included in the
Report to Congress FY 2002.

As part of a SITE Program evaluation in
1999, 43 Demonstration Program vendors
provided information regarding company revenues
after’ completion of their demonstration.
Following participation in the SITE Program, 58
percent of the responding vendors were awarded
commercial remediation jobs using technologies
demonstrated in the SITE Program. Thirty-three

5



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

Developer Technology Contact Program Status _|
Italy Gruppo Infrared Thermal —_| John Cioffi Demonstration | Completed 1987
Italimpresse Destruction 206-883-1900
(developed by ;
Shirco Infrared,
Systems, Inc.)
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
} 2 Demonstrations
‘Puerto Rico’ Terra Vac, Ine. In-situ Vacuum ©. ~.| James Maiot “| ‘Demonstration
Sh [San Juan, PRS) Extraction. 187-725-8750

A-23



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location '
California San Diego, CA In Well Vapor MACTEC Demonstration Completed
(continued) Naval Air Station Stripping of Environmental, : 1999
North Island (NASNI) | Ground Water Inc.
(Region 9) ' Pittsburgh, PA
Mark McGlathery
800-444-6221
San Diego, CA Cross-flow Zenon Demonstration Completed
NASNI Site 9 Pervaporation Environmental, 1995
Region 9) System for Inc.
Removal of Burlington,
VOCs from. Ontario, Canada
Groundwater Phil Canning
905-639-6320
San Francisco, CA GIS/KEY GIS Solutions, Demonstration Completed
Westin Hotel Software for HW | Inc. 1993
(Region 9) Site Concord, CA
Data Garry Reid
Management 510-827-5400
San Jose, CA Ultraviolet US Filter Demonstration Completed
Lorentz Barrel and Ozone Treatment | (formerly Ultrox
Drum Site for Liquids International, Inc)
Region 9) Santa Ana, CA
John Lowry
412-772-1247
San Pedro, CA In-situ Steam/ Novaterra, Inc. Demonstration Completed
Annex Terminal Air Stripping (formerly Toxic 1989
(Region 9) : Treatment, Inc.)
; Torrance, CA
' Phil La Mori
310-328-9433
Santa Barbara, CA Soil Washing/ BioGenesis Demonstration Completed
Santa Marie Health Geological Enterprises 1992,
Care Services(UST | Treatment (formerly .
Site) . BioVersal USA)
(Region 9). Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
South El Monte,CA ~ | Gasification Texaco Syngas, Demonstration Completed
Region 9) Process Ine. . 1994
White Plains, NY
John Winter

316-251-4000
ext. 536 JL

B-5



Total Contracts Awarded

3500

wi Superfund
Commercial

3000 t
2500
2000

1500

1156

1000

500

2957

240

Treatability Studies Remediation Jobs

international Contracts Total Jobs

Figure 3. Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation.
(Source: 1999 vendor information)

in 1999 from 14 vendors that participated in
the MMT Program. This information clearly
demonstrated the benefits that vendors receive
from the program, indicating that 71 percent
of the vendors sold more than 25 units since
their demonstration in the SITE Program.
Over 64 percent of the vendors indicated that
their technologies’ were used on international
remediation projects. In total, the MMT
vendors reported selling over 3,550 units on
900 jobs, including 48 international jobs.

+ Overall, vendor information shows
that SITE technology developers in the
Demonstration and MMT Programs are

achieving. commercial success, for.

demonstrated technologies. The impact of the
“SITE Program continues to grow overtime, as
illustrated by the consistent growth in' vendor
contracts over the last decade (Figure: 4).

Innovative Technology Highlights - - SITE
Program Case Studies

. This section presents case studies of
innovative remediation technologies for vendors .
that have participated in the SITE Program. The
case studies provide brief descriptions on the use
and status of representative technologies and,
where available, general information on’ the cost
of applying each technology. It is typical of the
SITE Program and represents the SITE Program’s
approach to promoting innovative technologies by
identifying user needs. In response to user needs,
the SITE Program assessed the performance of
several innovative field measurement devices for
total petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil
and sediment, iron reactive barrier technology for
in situ groundwater remediation, and a washing
technology for oil-contaminated soil.



EPA/540/R-03/502
March 2003

The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program

Annual Report to Congress
FY 2001

Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460

Reoycled/Recyclable

ta with vegetable-based ink on

per that contains ayaa of
6 post-consumer ‘fiber content
ter chlorine free.



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

Developer__| Technology Contact Program | Status _|
——= = : 5 i
Colorado Dept. of | Wetlatid-Based Tim Lewis Demonstration | Completed 1999 '
Health Treatment for * 303-692-3390
Denver, CO Mineral Mine : |
" Drainage :
Colorado School of | Wetlands-Based ‘Thomas Emerging” Completed i
Mines, Golden, CO:.:| Treatment *,~ Wildeman Technology
and Colorado, ~ 303-273-3642
‘Department of .
Health
Denver, CO *
General red Cail Datrymiple _| Demonstration __|. Completed 1995
Environmental Blectrocoagulation “'|..303-761-6960' °° : :
Corporation Suse wo eee
Englewood, CO ~
Pintail Systems, Biodegradation of * | Caten Caldwell | ‘Deindustration , | Completéd'1998
Inc. -* Cyanide “|. 303-367-8443 °
Aurora, CO i ’ = : :
: Biostabilization'of ;.| ‘Leslie...’ || Demonstration... | Completed 2000 i
Lead:..: >. “Thompson |
aaj saris } 30336748443 . :
“| Biostabilization of "".| ‘Leslie: = Detnonstration . | ‘Completed,
| Meicary NGniing .:°) “Thosapson :
‘| oWastes ; 303-367-8443,
| Biological: "| Leslie Demonstration | \Compleied:2000
| Stabilization of °° |Thompson ok ~
: . Arsenic’in Soils. "| 303-367-8443
Region 8 and Siaté | Multiple Innovative | Victor Demonstration’ } ‘Completed 2001
of Colorado Passive mine -Ketiellapper :
Drainage me 303-312-6578
“|. Technologies .
Rocky Mountain | | Bavironmental Soil |-Jim Barthel Demonstration’ |, Completed:
Remediation _~'.:|"Amendment 303-215-6620". Jos ;
Services ~} Gtabilization) as :
Golden, CO i ae
Smith ; Low-Temperature’. | Joseph Hutton’ |. Demonstration '* | Completed'1992
Environmental >| | Thermal Aeratioa .. || 303-790-1747 Pe Bae :
Technologies : See ee eee
Corporation
(formerly Canonie : : :
Environmental LS : |
Services Corp.) ” ene ee ta : 4
Englewood, CO hie = : apne» a
Anaerobic Thermal: °| Jéseph Hutton | Demonstration "| ‘Completed 1991
Processot._; |---| 303+790-1747 :

AG.



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

B-22

Demonstration Technology Contact Program Status
Location
Toronto, Canada Treatment Train | ‘Toronto.Harbor Demonstration. Completed
Toronto Port for Contaminated '| Commissioners 1992:
Industrial Division. Soils Toronito, Canada:
. Dennis.Lang
416-863-2047
Trenton, Ontario Bioremediation. GRACE, ‘Demonstration “Completed
Domtar Wood 7 Bioremediation : i 1994
Preserving Site ‘Technologi¢s
Mississauga,
Ontario; Canada:
) Alan Seech:
‘905-272-7480 t



Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in FY 01 (continued)

Developer
Location

Developer

Technology

Site Location

CA

Steam Tech
Environmental
Services

This project will extend the highly successful steam

| injection:remediation technology to fractured rock media.

‘The demonstration is aimed at'the recovery of chlorinated
solvents and to provide additional information regarding
remediating other fractured rock aquifers.

Caribou, ME

This in situ technology utilizes conductive heating from heater
wells to volatilize organic contaminants in the soil. The
contaminants are then removed with heater/vacuum wells.

Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO

University of
Connecticut

‘This project involves the évatuation’of thie DUOX (Dual

‘Oxidation) technology for remediating chlorinated organics. ‘The ”

DUOX technology. utilizes two’ ‘differerit chemical oxidants.

(Potassium permanganate. ‘and soditim: persulfate) injected-into the’
|| subsurface for the oxidation’ ‘ofthe ‘chlorinated solvent

contaminants. ° 8 PUAQ A GRIg2 a

Wernon, CT ¢

Weiss Associates

The Electrochemical Geoxidation (ECGO) process employs
electrode pairs inserted into contaminated soils and/or sediments.
A low voltage, low amperage coupled AC/DC current is applied
to create an induced polarization field. Redox reactions
mineralize organic contaminants and metals are deposited at the
electrodes.

Bellingham, WA.







SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

| State Developer Technolo; Contact Program Status
Pennsylvania Vortec Corp Oxidation and James Hnat Emerging Completed 1993
(continued) Collegeville, PA Vitrification 610-489-2255 Technology
Process
Demonstration Exited
South Carolina E&C Williams Chemical.” Charlie: Deniionstration’ ’'| ‘Completed 2001
Summerville, SC :,| Stabilization ‘of, ‘Williams 843:
: a Mercury Mining 821-4200
ay Wastes ': |
University of South; | Tissitu Mitigation’ | Frank Caruécio’. | Emerging Completed 1995
Carolina: ~"[-of'Acid ‘Water. 803-777-4512 ‘Technology % nook
Columbia, SC Shae Sos Sh Raspes
Tennessee Bergmann USA. Soil and Sediment George Jones Demonstration Completed 1992
Gallatin, IN Washing 615-230-2217
Technology
Brown and Root Radio Frequency Clifton Demonstration Completed 1994
Environmental/ Heating Blanchard
Wlinois Institute of 423-483-9900
Technology
Oak Ridge, TIN
IT Corporation Batch Steam Stuart Shealy Emerging Completed 1992
Knoxville, TN Distillation and 423-690-3211 | Technology
Metal Extraction
Eimco Biolift Kandi Brown Emerging Completed 1992
Slurry Reactor as 423-690-3211 Technology
developed by
Tekno Associates
Mixed Waste Ed Alperin Emerging Completed 1995
Treatment Process | 615-690-3211 | Technology
IT Corporation Photocalytic and Duane Graves | Em Completed 1993
Knoxville, TN Biological Soil 423-690-3211 Technology
Detoxificaiton
WASTECH, Inc. Solidification/ Terrence Lyons | Demonstration Completed 1991
Oak Ridge, TIN Stabilization U.S. EPA
513-569-7859
Texas Geokinetics'and | Blectrokinetic Hany: Demonstration’ | Completed 1999
Duke Engineering .” | Flushing'é&; “| Linnemeyer
<<] ‘Surfactant Flushing _ |. 512-425-2000"
Pech eo 22) steven Clark "4
| 510-704-2940".
PCB/Metals Tim Tarrillion »'| Demonstration _| Completed 1997.
| Extraction from.» }. 713-662-0727." | s- ies :
Porous Surfaces * 1



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE

State [Developer Technology Contact Program

Alabama CMS Research - Portablé Gas H. Ashley Pagé | ‘Monitoring and } Completed 1992
Corporation. -, Chromatograph 205-773-6911 Measurement’ .
Birmingham, AL Pee i Technologies

Alaska Arctic Foundations} Freeze Barrier Ed Yarmak Demonstration Completed 1998
Anchorage, AK. 907-562-2741
Brice Soil Washing Plant | Craig Jones Demonstration Completed 1992
Environmental 907-452-2512 :
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK

Arizona Arizona State’ Gregory Raupp | Emerging": ': }: Completed 1999
University ..* 606-965-3828: °’| Technology we
Tempe, AZ Elliot Berman’? "}:2¢0..

j : 352-867-1320 ‘S

STC Omega.» ,:] Solidification and ,. | Stephen Pelger "| Demonstration’ | Completed'990
(formerly Silicate’ Stabilization“ “Scott Larsen. 7 : 5 :
Technology - ‘Treatment 602-948-7100,
Corporation) eerie Raete ts: :
Scottsdale, AZ we

California Analytical and Automated Gary Hopkins | Monitoring and | Completed 1991
Remedial Sampling and 408-263-8931 | Measurement
Technology, Inc., | Analytical Platform Technologies
Milpitas, CA :
Berkeley In situ Enhanced Kent Udell Demonstration | Completed 1993
Environmental Extraction 510-642-2928
Restoration Center Steve Collins
(formerly Udell 510-643-1300
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Biriax Corp., Antox | Imunoassay for Richard Monitoring and | Completed 1992
Division PCB in Soil Lankow ‘Measurement
Sunnyville, CA 408-752-1353 Technologies
COGNIS, Ine. Biological/ Steve Rock Emerging Completed 1995
Santa Rosa, CA Chemical US.EPA Technology

Treatment 513-569-7149

Eco Mat, Inc. Biological Kim Halley Demonstration . | Completed 2000
Hayward, CA Denitrification 510-783-5885
Energy and Hybrid Fluidized | Richard Emerging Completed 1992
Environmental Bed System Koppang Technology
Research 714-859-8851
Corporation
Irvine, CA

A2



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State [Developer ‘Technology Contact Program Status
Massachusetts Bruker Instruments | Bruker Mobile Dr. Brian Monitoring and | Completed
(continued) Billerica, MA Environmental Abrabam Measurement

Monitor 508-667-9580 Technologies
HNU Systems, Inc. | Portable Gas Jack Driscoll Monitoring and | Completed 1992
Newtown, MA Chromatograph 800-724-6690 | Measurement
; ‘ 617-964-6690 | Technologies
HINU Systems, Inc. | Portable X-Ray Jack Driscoll Monitoring and | Completed 1995
Newtown, MA Fluorescence 800-724-6690 | Measurement
1 Spectrometer 617-964-6690 _| Technologies
KSB, Inc. Air James Kittrell | Demonstration | Completed 1999
Amherst, MA Photocatalytic 413-549-5506
. Technology for Air
Streams
Maxymillian High Temperature . | Jim Demonstration | Completed 1993
Technologies, Inc. | Therthal Process Maxymillian
(formerly Clean 413-499-3050
Berkshires) .
Lanesboro, MA
Millipore EnviroGard PCB Alan Weiss Monitoring and | Completed 1992
Corporation Immunoassay Test | 617-275-9200 | Measurement
Bedford, MA Kit Technologies
Immunoassay for _|- Alan Weiss Monitoring and | Completed 1993
PCP (Soil, Water) | 617-275-9200 | Measurement
so Technologies
Niton Corporation | Portable X-Ray Don Sackett Monitoring and | Completed 1995
Bedford, MA Fluorescence 781-275-9275 | Measurement
Spectrometer Technologies
Obmicron. Immunoassay for Mary Hayes Monitoring and | Completed 1993
Corporation PCP in Soil 215-860-5115 Measurement
Newton, MA Technologies
PSI Technology Co. } Immobilize and Joseph Morency | Emerging |, Completed 1993
Andover, MA Decontaminate 508-689-0003 | Technology
Metals in
Agaregate Solids
UV Technologies, | Laser-Induced. Jobn Roll Emerging Completed 1993
Inc, Photochemical James Porter Technology
(formerly Energy Oxidative 617-666-5500
and Environmental | Destruction
Engineering, Inc.) on :
East Cambridge,
MA
Michigan (and ‘Army Corps of Phytoremediation | ‘Detvoit, Mand | Demonstration’ | ‘Ongoing
Mississippi) ‘Engineers * eae ‘Micksburg, MS {:s RRS a
Minnesota). | BioTrot ti Biotreatmient of’ | Dennis Chilcote * ‘Completed 1989
vs a Eden Prairie, MN. | Groundwater 612-942-8032 “Ps



contaminated groundwater, divert uncontaminated groundwater from a contaminated area, or
divert contaminated groundwater from a drinking water intake or other protected resource.

INCINERATION involves the ex situ destruction of contaminated soil, sludge, and
sediment in high temperature (1,800 -.2,200°F) combustion devices. A typical hazardous waste
incinerator, diagrammed below, consists of a rotary kiln (primary combustion chamber), an -
afterburner (secondary combustion chamber), connected to an air pollution control system, all of
which are controlled and monitored.

PUMP-AND-TREAT involves removal of contaminated groundwater is from the ~
subsurface treatment, and discharge or reinjection, is one of the most widely used ground-water
remediation technologies. The pump and treat remediation approach is used at about three-
quarters of the Superfund sites where ground water is contaminated and at most sites where
cleanup is required by the Resource Conservation.and Recovery Act and state laws. It is often
associated with treatment technologies such as Air Stripping and Liquid -phase Granular
Activated Charcoal. Although the effectiveness of pump and treat systems has been called into

question after two decades of use, this approach remains a necessary component of most ground-

water remediation efforts and can be appropriate for both restoration and plume containment.



Groundwater\Surface Water

Sediments\Soils

PCBs

DNAPL\ Chlorinated Solvents

Arsenic, Mercury or other Heavy Metals

Pesticides

PCBs

PAHs

Arsenic, Mereury, or other Heavy Metals

Site Name/
Location

Technology/Develope

In situ heat

Project Descripti

Treatment of
Hexachlorocyclopentadi
ene soil contamination

Proposed Schedule

Demonstration FY02-03

Ex situ Biotreatment reactor

Comingled groundwater

Demonstration FY02-03

beneficial reuse

| Manufactured Gas technique plume contaminated.
|| Plant Site with PAHs, MTBE and
Millville, NJ BTEX
|] Jones Island CDF Phytoremediation Treatment of sediments Demonstration FY 02-03
Milwaukee Harbor i contaminated with
. H PAHs, PCBs for

Summitville, CO Multiple innovative passive Treatment of acid mine Demonstration FY01-03
drainage techniques drainage
|| Port of Ridgefield _| In sit steam heating Groundwater and soils _ | Demonstration FY02-03 |]
| Ridgefield, WA. contaminated with
DNAPL

Cape.Canaveral In situ reactive iron slurry Groundwater and soils Technology .
Cocoa Beach, FL contaminated with TCE | demonstration FY02-03
Cape Canaveral Tn situ biological treatment Groundwater and soils Technology

Cocoa Beach, FL contaminated with TCE | demonstration FY02-03
Loring AFB. Insitusteam | DNAPL treatment in Technology

Caribou, ME fractured bedrock demonstration summer

FY02-03

Pearl Harbor Naval
Base °

Multiple in situ capping
techniques

Evaluate biological and
stabilization\detoxificati
on techniques

19

Demonstration planning
to begin summer FY 02





FY 01 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits

Promotion of Innovative Technologies

SITE is recognized. by EPA as one of
its principal programs to advance innovative
site monitoring, characterization, and cleanup
technologies with the potential to treat
hazardous wastes more efficiently, less

. expensively, and more safely than existing
methods. SITE’s mission is to promote the
development and application of innovative
technologies that reduce or eliminate risks to

- human health and the environment due to
contamination. The goal of the program is to
interact with the technology user community,
understand its needs, integrate those needs
with EPA’s résearch mission, and
expeditiously address those needs. Identifying
and responding to the technology needs of the
remediation community is the driving force
behind today’s SITE Program. i

Responding to technology needs is the driving
force behind the SITE Program. :

The need for credible and reliable data
for innovative technologies is significant.
Often, Records of Decision (RODs—official
records documenting selection of Superfund
site cleanup methods) indicate that innovative
technologies were not chosen due to a lack of
verified performance and implementability.
The SITE Program serves to fill this need for
credible evaluations so that more effective,
cost-efficient methods can be used on
remediation problems.

The types and numbers of innovative
technologies selected for remediation at
Superfund sites increased significantly after the
passage of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization. Act (SARA). Since. then, the
number has continued to rise, indicating increased
credibility and confidence in a number of
innovative treatment technologies. As a result,
more innovative technologies than conventional
technologies were selected in RODs signed during
FY 93 through FY 00. ,

_ During the first 10 years of the SITE
Program, an emphasis was placed on innovative
technologies for permanent treatment that usually
required the removal (ex. situ), of soil or
groundwater. Most field demonstrations during
this period in the program’s history involved ex
situ physical/chemical and thermal technologies
that could be field tested in a matter of days or
weeks. The need for innovative, in situ
technologies that are more cost-effective, result in
less secondary waste, and are less intrusive will
continue. to increase. The SITE Program has
recognized this need and has emphasized the
development of in situ technologies.

Figure 1 presents the number of in situ
technologies as a percentage of all treatment
technologies for source control by fiscal year.
Over time, use of in situ technologies has been
increasing, as the trendline in Figure 1 shows. A
five-year moving average of the percentage of in
situ treatment technologies shows a generally
steady increase from 28 percent (FY 1985-1988) to
51 percent (FY1995-1999). Several factors may
play a role in this upward trend in the use of in
situ treatment technologies. Because: in situ
technologies require no excavation, risk from
exposure to. contaminated media is reduced,

3



TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)

State Demonstration Technology Contact
Location

7 | Geapraka jena Vcomp

‘Rocky Flats, co"
‘Regi m8): *

303-312-6571

Connecticut —_- | Roosevelt Mills Permanganate/ | George Hoag Demonstration
Vernon, CT 860-486-2781

Garrett

800484-8404

Florida Brandon, FL Infrared Grupo Italimprese_ | Demonstration
Peak Oil Superfund —_| Incinerator . (Ecova Europa)
Site (formerly
Region 4) ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Cape Canveral, FL . | Dynamic Integrated Water | Demonstration
| Underground Resources, Inc.
Stripping of TCE_| 805-565-0996.
7



Appendix C

ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL INFORMATION RESOURCES



SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)

State Developer Technolo; Contact Program Status ||
‘Texas (continued) -|:ENSR Consulting’ "| ‘Bioventing, Air ‘David Ramsden} Demonstration’ | Completed 1995
os ‘| Engineering'and.’. | Sparging, (ENSR) . :

| Larson Engisieering ° | Biological 713-520-6802",
‘Houston, TX ‘Treatment for 'N: Sathi-
Gfound Water yaleutiar °
(multi-developer  |'716-272-7310
project ‘With the.
* State of New-York). 2
| Filter Flow Colloid Polishing | Todd Johnson,’ | ‘Demonstration «| Completed 1992.
Technology, Inc. Method 713-334-6080, ee :
League City, TX : 2
:Fugio Geosciences}: * Laser Fluorescence | Andiew.Taer: °° “Monitoring and ”:|:\Completed 1996.
| Tn. | BAH, BTEX’ |. 713-778-5580 | Measuring mo
'| ‘Scteeaing Cone ee | "Technologies
i Penetrometer ; :
‘Peep Test Kit’ John Haniby. °° '-:) ‘Monitoring and | Completed 1993
é 512-847-1212 | ‘Measurement: :
ape ee Technologies
HRUBOUT Process, | Barbara Hrubetz ||. Demonstration
: eye ois |: Michael © ~ : .
“Hnbetz :
x “214-363-7833
: ‘Solidtech, Ine.” ‘Solidification and. | Bill Stallworth. | Demonsiration "| Conipleted:1988
“Houston, TX: Stabilization |... (| 713-497-8558... ]- mas j
: Star Organics’ | Injection Soil,“ “| ‘Phil Clarke | Demoistration "| Completed’ 1999.
: Dallas, TX ‘Amendment 214-522-0742 ee
: ages ©] (Stabilization), ee
{bce wen EN Spectrage: ‘Portable X-Ray. |-Peter'Barry . | ‘Monitoring and’ ‘Completed i995
Round Rock, TX. °,,| Fluorescence 512-388-9100" ‘|: Measuring aes
steantity al | Spectrometer ae Technologies
‘Microbial’ Todd‘Kennéy ~':] “Demonstration: '} Ongoing *
‘Degradation of’ 512-310-9000: Bt, co .
| pcas cee
| Concentrated Salt” Dennis Ctifford :*| ‘Bmnerging ‘Completed 1999
| Extraction of Lead’ | .713-743~ as * | Technology: : my
! Wester Product . | CCBA Physical and | Donald Kelly.” Emerging ‘| compléted i994
"Recovery Group, |’ Chemical,” * | 713-493-9321 |. Technology - ;
ne. “Treatment Bert Elidnis |: :
“Houston, TX: a 619-749-8856"
Utah 'Phytokinetics, Inc. | Phytoremediation | Ari Ferro Emerging Coinpleted 1999
North Logan, UT | of Soils 801-750-0985 | Technology
Demonstration _| Completed 1999



[state __ | __Developer_| | Technology _|__Contact_|_Program | __status_]

SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER

‘ATE (continued)

Washington, Wilder ‘Matcon: Modified W. Randall Demonstration’ "|| Completed 2001
(Continued) Construction AsphaltCap -Gairett ens :
& Peg Pek : 300-484-9404
Wisconsin Minergy Thermal Sediment | Terry Carroll Demonstration |} Completed 2001
i Reuse Technology | 920-727-1411
Svedala Industries | Pyrokiin Thermal | Jim Kidd Emerging Completed 1993
(formerly Allis Encapsulation 414-798-6341 | Technology
Mineral Systems) | Process Glenn Heian
Oak Creek, WI 414-762-1190
USEPA/NRMRL | Fungus Treatment | RichardLamar | Demonstration | Completed 1991
US-DA Forest Technology , 608-231-9469
Products Lab :
Madison
University of Photoelectro- Marc Anderson | Emerging Completed
Wisconsin, catalytic Treatment | 608-262-2674 | Technology
of Metals and Charles Hill, Jr.

608-263-4593

Organics in Water

Atomic Energy of

Ultrasonic-Acid Shiv Vijayan Completed
Canada, Limited Leachate 613-583-3311
Chalk River, ‘Treatment for ext, 3220/6057
Ontario Mixed Wastes
Atomic Energy of © | Chemical Leo Buckley Emerging Completed 1993
Canada, Limited Treatment and 613-584-3311 Technology
Chalk River, Ultrafiltration
Ontario :
| Cone Tech Resistivity, pH, ‘Ward Phillips | Monitoring and | Completed 1992
Inyestigations Seismic, _ | 604-327-4311 Measuring,
Vancouver, British | Temperature, Cone Technologies
Colombia Penetrometer
ELI Ecologic Thermal Gas Phase | Jim Nash Demonstration Completed 1992
International, Inc. Reduction Process 519-856-9591
Rockwood, Ontario | and Thermal

Desorption
EnviroMetal In Situ Reactive John Vogan Demonstration Completed 2000
Technologies, Inc. Barrier 519-824-0432
EnviroMetal Metal Enhanced William Demonstration,
Technologies, Inc. | Abiotic Matulewiez
Guelph, Ontario Degradation 609-722-6700 Ex-situ Completed 1995
2 Demonstrations

In-situ Completed





Soil Vapor Extraction
36 sites ($1,248)

Bioremediation
26 sites ($517)
Phytoremediation
§ sites ($18) :
ie Other
Treatment Barrier ae net 5
4 sites ($58) Vitrification 10 sites ($282)

2 sites ($164)

Air Sparging

8 sites ($74)

Solvent Extraction
2 sites ($125)

Thermal Desorption
15 sites ($158)

Savings estimates based on comparison of innovative and conventional technologies for
FY 93-99 RODs. Savings shared equally among technologies when multiple
technologies were used and technology-specific costs were not available.

Figure 2. Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type
(millions of 2000 dollars).

percent of the vendors were awarded more This trend from the vendor information is
than 10 contracts each. Over 35 percent consistent with the RODs analysis results which
reported one or more international contracts, were shown in Figure 1, providing two sources of
identifying 37 countries where jobs were data to confirm the outstanding commercial
contracted. Figure 4 provides a historical success of these technologies.

perspective of growth in the number of
contracts awarded to SITE vendors from 1990
to 1999.

“Our involvement with the SITE Program and
especially our EPA Project Officer, Ed Bates,
The 1999 Demonstration Program has been very successful. We appreciate
vendor information has been broken down by everyone’s efforts and the program’s agenda.”
technology type to ascertain which
technologies demonstrated the greatest Scott Larsen, STC Remediation, Inc.
commercial success. Figure 5 shows the share (Chemical Fixation/Solidification
by technology type of the 3,229 remediation Technologies)
and treatability contracts awarded to vendors.
It is clear from this chart that soil vapor
extraction and bioremediation technologies
have had the most commercial success. In addition to the 43 Demonstration
Program vendors, information was obtained