alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### L. Hugh WHITE and Claudia White v. The FOUNDATION CORPORATION, a corporation, and City of Bay Minette, a Municipal Corporation.

78-658.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 29, 1980.

J. Connor Owens, Jr., Bay Minette, for appellants.

Norborne C. Stone, Jr. of Stone & Partin, Bay Minette, for appellees.

SHORES, Justice.

This is an appeal by L. Hugh White and Claudia White, plaintiffs, from a decree rendered in favor of the defendants, The Foundation Corporation and the City of *824Bay Minette. By their complaint, the plaintiffs sought a declaration that a certain strip of land on the east end of Lakeview Drive, adjoining the third unit of Forest Park, a subdivision developed by Foundation on lands owned by it and approved by the City of Bay Minette, was a “reserved strip” as contemplated by the regulations of the Bay Minette Planning Commission. The plaintiffs, who own land immediately east of the strip, asked the court to order the developer-owner to convey that strip of land to the City of Bay Minette. The trial court heard the evidence and held that the strip of land described in the complaint, and restated in the decree, was “not a reserved strip in violation of the regulations of Bay Minette Planning Commission.” The court then concluded that the plaintiffs were not entitled to a decree requiring Foundation to convey the strip of land to the city.

We affirm.

The trial court specifically found as a fact that the strip was not a “reserved strip” and there was evidence offered which supports this finding. Although the plaintiffs offered evidence to the contrary, the trial judge decided this fact question against them. In that circumstance, we must affirm his finding unless convinced that it is plainly and palpably wrong. *Cowden v. Hughes,*353 So.2d 505 (Ala.1977). *Casey v. Beck,*350 So.2d 429 (Ala.1977). The appellants have not met this burden.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45267-45268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Brooke Corporation; Order of Suspension of Trading

August 28, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Brooke Corporation because it has not filed any periodic reports with 
the Commission since the period ended June 30, 2008.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange

[[Page 45268]]

Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company 
is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, August 28, 2009 through 
11:59 p.m. EDT, on September 11, 2009.


    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21142 Filed 8-28-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<PAGE>

                                      EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.  SUBSIDIARIES OF SCHERER HEALTHCARE, INC.

1.  Medical Waste Systems, Inc.                 Subsidiary
    DBA Bio Systems                             I.D.#22-2853378
    380 Constance Drive                         
    Warminster, Pennsylvania 18974
    (215) 672-8888

2.  ASH Enterprises, Inc.                       Subsidiary
    2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 300            I.D.# 58-1728029
    Atlanta, Georgia 30339
    (770) 333-0066

3.  Bio Systems Partners                        Majority Owned Partnership
    DBA Bio Systems                             I.D.# 58-1822608
    210 Sherwood Avenue
    Farmingdale, New York 11735
    (516) 756-9433
    
4.  Biofor, Inc.                                Subsidiary
    P.O. Box 629                                I.D.# 58-2105818
    Waverly, Pennsylvania 18471
    (717) 586-1333

5.  BioWaste Management Corp.                   Subsidiary
    2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 300            I.D.# 11-2872389
    I.D.# 11-2872389
    Atlanta, Georgia 30339
    (770) 333-0066

6.  BioWaste Systems, Inc.                      Subsidiary
    2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 300            I.D.# 58-1803613
    Atlanta, Georgia 30339
    (770) 333-0066

7.  Scherer Laboratories, Inc.                  Subsidiary
    2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 300            I.D.# 75-0270890
    Atlanta, Georgia 30339
    (770) 333-0066

8.  Marquest Medical Products, Inc.             Majority Owned Subsidiary
    11039 E. Lansing Circle                     I.D. # 84-0785259
    Englewood, Colorado 80112
    (303) 790-4835
Exhibit No. 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-151380) on Form S-1 and (No. 333-151379) on Form S-8 of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2009, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.

| | /s/ CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP
| | -------------------------

Toldeo, Ohio
March 27, 2009
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Derwin BOURGEOIS v. ORLEANS INDIGENT DEFENDER PROGRAM.

No. 64113.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Derwin Bourgeois applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. The appeal was taken August 21, 1978, and the transcript has recently been received by the Orleans Indigent Defender Program. Assignments of Error are in the process of being prepared, and OIDP is instructed to send copy to relator when they are filed. The OIDP informs us that the transcript will be sent to the relator after conclusion of the appeal.
# Haiti

223 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 9, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 9, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing: Barbara A. Feinstein  Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Caribbean Affairs and Haiti	  Barbara FeinsteinAugust 4, 2023Miami Media Hub  
        -    Press Statement  		Kenya Considering Leading a Multinational Force in Haiti	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 1, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 31, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 31, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 20, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 20, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken and Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 5, 2023U.S. Chief of Mission ResidencePort of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Haitian Prime Minister Henry	  July 5, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Haiti 	  June 27, 2023 

previous page1…56789…23next page

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Contact Us – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

# 									Contact Us – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability							

For more information Contact AVC Press at AVC-Press-DL@state.gov or visit the Office of Verification, Planning, and Outreach.

Back to Top
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25.1357-1A**Date:**10/22/2007** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Circuit protective devices** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  25**Section Number(s):**Sec. 25.1357** ****Cancels:**AC 25.1357-1**Initiating Office:**ANM-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 370.13 Can time limits for taking an action on a credit entry be extended?

If we or your financial institution are delayed beyond applicable time limits in taking any action with respect to a credit entry because of circumstances beyond our control, then the time for taking that action will be extended as necessary until the cause of the delay ends.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 276 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 276

     To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using campaign 
            contributions for inherently personal purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using campaign 
            contributions for inherently personal purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INHERENTLY PERSONAL 
              PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end of the 
following new section:

 ``prohibition of use of contributions for inherently personal purposes

    ``Sec. 323. (a) An individual who receives contributions as a 
candidate for Federal office--
            ``(1) may use such contributions only for legitimate and 
        verifiable campaign expenses;
            ``(2) may not accept any salary or similar payment from 
        such contributions; and
            ``(3) may not use such contributions for any inherently 
        personal purpose.
    ``(b) As used in this subsection--
            ``(1) the term `campaign expenses' means expenses 
        attributable solely to bona fide campaign purposes; and
            ``(2) the term `inherently personal purpose' means a 
        purpose that, by its nature, is for personal benefit, and such 
        term includes a home mortgage payment, clothing purchase, 
        noncampaign automobile expense, and any other inherently 
        personal living expense.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contributions received after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Gabon

66 items

        -    Report  		Gabon	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Gabon	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (18-907) – Agreement Regarding Defense Articles, Related Training, and Other Defense Services	  September 7, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (18-814) – Agreement Concerning Defense Articles, Training, and Other Defense Services on a Grant Basis	  August 14, 2018 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  May 29, 2018 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
§ 124.702 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Act* means the Public Health Service Act.
*Department* means the Department of Health and Human Services.
*Expected useful life* means the period of time during which the structure may reasonably be expected to perform the function for which it was designed or intended.
*Facility* means a facility with respect to which grant funds were paid under any of the authorizations listed in § 124.701.
*Fiscal year* means the facility's fiscal year.
*Nonprofit,* as applied to any facility, means a facility that is owned and operated by one or more nonprofit corporations or associations no part of the net earnings of which inures, or may lawfully inure, to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health and Human Services to whom the authority involved has been delegated.
*State agency* means ( 1 ) in the case of a facility with respect to which a grant was made under title VI of the Public Health Service Act or any of the statutes listed in § 124.701(b), the State agency designated pursuant to section 604 of the Public Health Service Act or its successor agency, and
( 2 ) in the case of a facility with respect to which a grant was made under title XVI of the Public Health Service Act, the State health planning and development agency designated pursuant to title XV of the Public Health Service Act.
*Then value* means the value of the facility on the date the facility is sold, transferred or ceases to be used for a permissible use as described in § 124.704.
# C_2005263EN.01005001.xml

| 22.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/50

---

Open call for proposals VP/2005/019

‘2006 — European Year of Workers' Mobility — Towards a European labour market’

(2005/C 263/15)

The objective of the call is to provide financial support for the organisation of cooperation and awareness-raising activities as well as pilot projects aimed at enhancing mobility opportunities for workers in Europe, promoting the exchange of good practice and informing relevant stakeholders about the rights of workers to free movement as well as the instruments to support mobility in the EU.

Proposals must be developed and implemented by a partnership involving at least two relevant stakeholders potentially interested in the objectives of the call, and in particular public authorities and social partner organisations operating at European, national, regional or local level, non-governmental organisations, businesses, academia, associations, foundations, municipalities, chambers of commerce, as well as the media.

Coordinated proposals which are original, significant, innovative, participative, and lead to possible follow up activities will be given priority.

The budget available for the present call is estimated at EUR 4 million, provided that the budgetary authority confirms the budget allocations. The Commission will co-finance projects up to a maximum of 85 % of the total eligible costs. Depending on the quality of the applications the Commission expects to fund between 20 and 30 projects (average grant between EUR 100 000 and EUR 150 000).

The deadline for the submission of applications is 12 December 2005.

Further information regarding the call for proposals, including the guide for applicants and all other relevant documentation can be downloaded at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/calls/tender_en.cfm

Please note that enquiries should be made by e-mail only to:

empl-e-vp/2005/19@cec.eu.int.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 25, 2013

h0122 

# Order

January 25, 2013

145971

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145971

COA: 311012

Wayne CC: 11

- 003252

- FC

ANTHONY TONY HOWZE, a/k/a

ANTHONY TONY SPYDELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after

the date of this order, addressing the issue whether the defendant should be allowed the

opportunity to withdraw his plea in light of People v Cole , 491 Mich 325 (2012).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
§ 562.506 Provision of certain legal services authorized. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 562.201 is authorized, provided that all receipts of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be specifically licensed: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings in defense of property interests subject to U.S. jurisdiction;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any Federal or State agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 562.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 562.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
HomeSpain

# Spain

120 items

        -    Media Note  		Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to Spain and UN Ocean Decade Conference	  April 8, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Spanish State Secretary for Foreign and Global Affairs Martínez Belío	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Spain Central America Working Group	  April 2, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Madrid, Spain: American School of Madrid: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Barcelona, Spain: Benjamin Franklin International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Barcelona, Spain: American School of Barcelona: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 22, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation Senior Officials Meeting	  February 20, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative Hachigian’s Travel to Munich and Barcelona	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Spain, the United Kingdom, and Belgium	  January 19, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		Pursuing Tech-Driven Solutions to Disrupt Trafficking in Cultural Property Worldwide	  January 11, 2024 

123…12next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December  31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.




                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  February 16, 2004
#### § 585.314 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or other extensions of credit, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.