alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arthur H. RUDE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 78-385.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1979.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1979.

Robert W. Stern, Miami, for petitioner.

Stephen Marc Slepin of Slepin & Slepin, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner was found to have violated provisions of the Florida elections law, and civil fines were assessed against him. While we conclude that the findings of the Florida Elections Commission were without error, it is apparent that civil fines were imposed for violations that occurred prior to the time such authority was granted the Commission. Section 106.265, Florida Statutes (1977), authorizing the imposition of civil fines became effective on January 1, 1978, and most of petitioner’s violations occurred prior thereto and the fines levied on each such violation individually set forth.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted and the provisions of the order of January 24, 1978, assessing civil penalties for violations occurring prior to January 1, 1978, are quashed; and the Respondent, Florida Elections Commission, is hereby directed to conduct further proceedings in accord with the terms of this opinion.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Weight (Including Battery) 1216 g

Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max Descent Speed 3 m/s

Max Speed 16 m/s 

(ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Altitude Above Sea Level

6000 m

Max Flight Time Approximately 25 

minutes

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

Navigation System Built-in GPS

Gimbal

Controllable Range Pitch -90° to +30°

Angular Vibration Range ±0.02°

Camera

Sensor 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12 M

Lens

FOV (Field Of View) 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8

ISO Range 100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo)

Electronic Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s

Image Max Size 4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single Shot, Burst Shooting: 

3/5/7 frames, Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 

3/5, Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias, Time-lapse

Video Recording Modes 2.7K: 2704 x1520p 24/25/30 (29.97), FHD: 

1920x1080p 24/25/30, HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Max.Video Bitrate 40 Mbps

Supported File Formats Micro SD Card: FAT32/exFAT, Photo: 

JPEG, DNG Video: 

MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC)

Supported SD Card Types Micro SD Card 8 GB included

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

Wi-Fi Video Link

Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz – 2.483 GHz

Max Transmission Distance

FCC: 1000 m; CE: 500 m 

(outdoors and unobstructed, aircraft's altitude at 400 feet (120 m))

Transmitter Power (EIRP) FCC: 27 dBm; CE: 20 dBm

Power Spectral Density 5.69mW/MHz

Remote Controller

Operating Frequency

5.725 GHz – 5.825 GHz, 922.7 MHz – 927.7 MHz (Japan)

Max Transmission Distance

FCC: 1000 m; CE: 500 m 

(outdoors and unobstructed, aircraft's altitude at 400 feet (120 m))

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

Battery 2600 mAh LiPo 18650

Transmitter Power (EIRP) FCC: 19 dBm CE: 14 dBm

Working Voltage 600 mA @ 3.7V

Charging Port Micro USB

DJI PHANTOM 3 SPEC SHEET
Charger

Voltage 17.4 V

Rated Power 57 W

Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-

4480 mAh-15.2 V )

Capacity 4480 mAh

Voltage 15.2 V

Battery Type LiPo 4S

Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g

Max Flight Time Approximately 25 minutes

Operating Temperature -10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power 100 W

App / Live View

Mobile App DJI GO

EIRP 100mW

Live View Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM

Live View Quality 720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Latency Low Latency Video (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Required Operating Systems iOS 8.0 or later Android 4.1.2 or later

Recommended Devices 

iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular, 

iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular,

iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. 

This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus

Android: Samsung tabs 705c, Samsung S6, Samsung S5, Samsung NOTE4, 

Samsung NOTE3, Google Nexus 9, Google Nexus 7 II, Ascend Mate7, 

Nubia Z7 mini, SONY Z3 EXPERIA, MI 3, MI PAD

*Support for additional Android devices available as testing 

and development continues.
EXHIBIT 32

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merisel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Timothy N. Jenson, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Timothy N. Jenson
------------------------------
Timothy N. Jenson
Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 10.23 340B ADR Panel decision process. ( a ) The 340B ADR Panel will conduct a review of the claims. The 340B ADR Panel will review all documents gathered during the 340B ADR process to determine if a violation as described in § 10.21(a)(1) or (2) has occurred.
( b ) The 340B ADR Panel will prepare a decision letter based on its review. The 340B ADR Panel's decision letter will be completed within one year of receiving a complete claim for review, except to the extent that there are situations beyond the control of the 340B ADR Panel that may affect the ability to issue a decision on a claim within one year. If the issuance of a 340B ADR Panel decision will exceed one year, the 340B ADR Panel must provide notice to the parties involved. The 340B ADR Panel decision letter will represent the determination of a majority of the 340B ADR Panel members' findings regarding the claim and include an explanation regarding each finding. The 340B ADR Panel will transmit its decision letter to all parties and to the OPA Director.
( c ) The 340B ADR Panel decision letter will inform the parties involved of their rights for reconsideration as described in § 10.24. Either party may request reconsideration of the 340B ADR Panel decision or the Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) Administrator may decide to initiate a reconsideration without such a request. The final agency decision will be binding upon the parties involved in the dispute unless invalidated by an order of a Federal court. The 340B ADR Panel's decision letter will be effective 30 business days from issuance and serve as the final agency decision unless: ( 1 ) Within 30 business days of issuance, reconsideration occurs under § 10.24; or
( 2 ) Within 30 business days of issuance, the Secretary makes a determination that the Secretary will review the decision.
( d ) The OPA Director will determine any necessary corrective action or consider whether to take enforcement action, and the form of any such action, based on the final agency decision.
HomeOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues...U S Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues  Releases

# Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues Releases

48 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report to Congress on Tibet Negotiations	  June 30, 2022 
        -    Speech  		The Administration’s Approach to the People’s Republic of China	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 26, 2022The George Washington UniversityWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: China—Tibet	  May 3, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Occasion of the Panchen Lama’s 33rd Birthday	  Ned PriceApril 25, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) - Tibet	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Access to Tibetan Areas: Section 4 of the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note)	  March 16, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		Department of State’s 2022 Losar Reception	  Department of State’s 2022 Losar ReceptionMarch 3, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Marking Losar, the Tibetan New Year	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 3, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Under Secretary Uzra Zeya as the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 20, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Occasion of His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s 86th Birthday	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 6, 2021 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from Moto Photo, Inc's 1996
10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,398,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,898,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,211,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,794,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,367,254
<PP&E>                                      11,322,629
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,493,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,485,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,617,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        77,860
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,450,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,485,212
<SALES>                                     36,236,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,287,566
<CGS>                                       18,883,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,116,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,227,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,325,101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             455,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,923,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                   850,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,073,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,073,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
§ 121.5 Listing requirements. ( a ) A transplant hospital which is an OPTN member may list individuals, consistent with the OPTN's criteria under § 121.8(b)(1), only for a designated transplant program.
( b ) Transplant hospitals shall assure that individuals are placed on the waiting list as soon as they are determined to be candidates for transplantation. The OPTN shall advise transplant hospitals of the information needed for such listing.
( c ) An OPTN member shall pay a registration fee to the OPTN for each transplant candidate it places on the waiting list. The amount of such fee shall be calculated to cover (together with contract funds awarded by the Secretary) the reasonable costs of operating the OPTN and shall be determined by the OPTN with the approval of the Secretary. No less often than annually, and whether or not a change is proposed, the OPTN shall submit to the Secretary a statement of its proposed registration fee, together with such supporting information as the Secretary finds necessary to determine the reasonableness or adequacy of the fee schedule and projected revenues. This submission is due at least three months before the beginning of the OPTN's fiscal year. The Secretary will approve, modify, or disapprove the amount of the fee within a reasonable time of receiving the OPTN's submission.
[63 FR 16332, Apr. 2, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 56659, Oct. 20, 1999]
#### Adeline Cobb FOSHEE v. Sam JAMES, Sheriff, Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana.

No. 64751.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1979.

In re Adeline Cobb Foshee, applying for supervisory, remedial writs and habeas corpus. Parish of Natchitoches. No. 46,098.

Writ granted. Applicant’s bail may be by competent surety and leave is hereby granted to seek reduction thereof by appropriate proceedings.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Steven Ray HUNTSBERRY v. Euda DELCAMBRE, Warden.

No. 81-KH-0281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1981.

In re Steven Ray Huntsberry, applying for remedial writ. Parish of Vermillion. No. 22153.

Writ denied. Petitioner has an appeal pending in this Court.
#### Lawrence PEOPLES, Appellant, v. Wayne DORR, et al., Appellees.

No. AD-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 4, 1982.

R. Jeremy Solomon of Booth & Conner, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Alan E. DeSerio and Ella Jane P. Davis, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Selfe v. Smith,*397 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); *Woodman v. Dever,*367 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); and *Dowling v. Blue Cross of Florida,*338 So.2d 88 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
#### Lee Allen THOMAS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52404.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1981.

Albert S. Johnston, III, Karl R. Steinber-ger, Johnston & Steinberger, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Darwin M. Maples, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
HomeBrazil

# Brazil

213 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Belo Horizonte, Brazil: The American School of Belo Horizonte: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas Advances Through a Second Annual High-level Meeting in the Dominican Republic	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas High-level Meeting Outcomes for 2024	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Sao Paulo, Brazil: Graded-The American School of Sao Paulo: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Escola Americana do Rio de Janeiro: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Recife, Brazil: American School of Recife: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Porto Alegre, Brazil: Pan American School of Porto Alegre: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Brasilia, Brazil: American School of Brasilia: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Raquel Krahenbuhl of TV Globo	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 25, 2024JW Marriott HotelRio de Janeiro, Brazil 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Brazil Co-Host “Rising to the Challenge on Haiti” Multinational Security Support Mission Ministerial Meeting in Rio de Janeiro	  February 22, 2024 

123…22next page

Back to Top
# New Zealand

119 items

        -    Report  		New Zealand	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (16-1212) – Technology Safeguards Associated with United States Participation in Space Launches in New Zealand	  December 12, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (14-703) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 3, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (10-1112) – Protocol Amending the Convention of July 23, 1982 for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  November 12, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (10-909) – Agreement on Facilitating Science and Technology Cooperation that Contributes to Domestic and External Security Capabilities	  September 9, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (13034) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  May 21, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (12860) – Air Transport Agreement	  June 18, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (92-1002) – Agreement Concerning a Framework of Principles and Procedures for Consultations Regarding Trade and Investment Relations	  October 2, 1992 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
HomeIraq

# Iraq

416 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs	  Barbara A. LeafFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 31, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 31, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 30, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 30, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Financial Measures Against Iraqi Bank and Designating its Owner	  Matthew MillerJanuary 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Condemning the Attacks Damaging Civilian Infrastructure in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region	  Matthew MillerJanuary 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 25, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 25, 2024WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 24, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 24, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 18, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 17, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 17, 2024Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…34567…42next page

Back to Top
§ 8.28 Termination of enrollment. ( a ) *Attorneys, certified public accountants.* The enrollment of a practitioner to whom an enrollment card has been issued will terminate when that person becomes eligible to practice without enrollment under § 8.2 (a) or (b), and that person shall surrender his or her enrollment card to the Director for cancellation.
( b ) *Expiration of enrollment.* The enrollment of any person will automatically terminate after the date indicated on the enrollment card unless, during the 12-month period prior to the expiration date, that person applies for renewal of enrollment with the Director as provided in § 8.25. In this case, the person may continue to practice before the Bureau until his or her application has been finally determined.
March 7, 2012

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: Spirit Airlines, Inc. Request for Consolidated U.S.

- Mexico

Cer tificate ( Mexico Procedural Docket DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0076 )

Dear Ms. Rosenberg :

Spirit Airlines, Inc. (“Spirit”) hereby requests that its U.S.

- Mexico exemption authorities

be consolidated into a U.S.

- Mexico certificate pursuant to the procedure s described i n the

Department’s Notic e dated February 13, 2009 in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2005

- 22228

. As required by

that notice, Spirit holds a blanket open skies certificate (Order 2007

- 7

- 3). Grant of this request is

consistent with the Department’s streamlining policy.

Sp irit requests consolidation of the following exemptions:

Fort Lauderdale

- Cancun DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 15306 NOAT 01/26/2011

Fort Lauderdale

- Toluca DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0011 NOAT 01/26/2011

Detroit

- Cancun DOT

- OST

- 2004

- 18692 NOAT 07/15/2011

Dallas/Ft. Worth

- Toluca DO T

- OST

- 2012

- 0021 NOAT 02/17/2012

Sincerely,

Joanne W. Young

David M. Kirstein

Counsel for Spirit Airlines, Inc.

cc: Docket

S ervice listCertificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following

persons:

_______________________ Lyndsey Grunewald

March 7, 2012 Anita.mosner@hklaw.com

Benjamin_slocum@usairways.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

Carl.nelson@aa.com

cefelts@fedex.com

dan.weiss@united.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

jcanny@amerijet.com

jeff.morgan@delta.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

john.Fr edericksen@suncountry.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

msinick@ssd.com Patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

rbkeiner@crowell.com

Robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

robert.la nd@jetblue.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

Stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com

john.allen@faa.gov

urskr@state.gov

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

brian. hedberg@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov