alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 136a.16 Beneficiary Identification Cards and verification of tribal membership. ( a ) The Indian Health Service will issue Beneficiary Identification Cards as evidence of beneficiary status to persons who are currently eligible for services under § 36a.12(a). Persons requesting Beneficiary Identification Cards must submit or have on file evidence satisfactory to the Indian Health Service of tribal membership and residence within a Health Service Delivery Area. The absence of a Beneficiary Identification Card will not preclude an otherwise eligible Indian from obtaining services though it may delay the administrative determination that an individual is eligible for services on a no charge basis.
( b ) For establishing eligibility or obtaining a Beneficiary Identification Card, applicants must demonstrate that they are members of a federally recognized tribe. Membership in a federally recognized tribe is to be determined by the individual tribe or the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Therefore, the Indian Health Service will recognize two methods of demonstrating tribal membership: ( 1 ) Documentation that the applicant meets the requirements of tribal membership as prescribed by the charter, articles of incorporation, or other legal instruments or traditional processes of the tribe and has been officially designated a tribal member by an authorized tribal official or body; or
( 2 ) Certification of tribal enrollment or membership by the Secretary of the Interior acting through the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
( c ) Demonstrating membership in a federally recognized tribe is the responsibility of the applicant. However, the Indian Health Service may consult with the appropriate tribe or the Bureau of Indian Affairs on outstanding questions regarding an applicant's tribal membership if the Indian Health Service has some documentation that it believes may be helpful to the tribe or the Bureau of Indian Affairs in making their determination.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0107) [50 FR 35050, Sept. 16, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 53914, Sept. 6, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20133]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Cape Cod National Seashore, South Wellfleet, MA; Cape Cod 
National Seashore Advisory Commission Two Hundredth Sixty-ninth Notice 
of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, section 
10), that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission will be held on September 14, 2009.
    The Commission was reestablished pursuant to Public Law 87-126 as 
amended by Public Law 105-280. The purpose of the Commission is to 
consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or her designee, with 
respect to matters relating to the development of Cape Cod National 
Seashore, and with respect to carrying out the provisions of sections 4 
and 5 of the Act establishing the Seashore.
    The Commission members will meet at 1 p.m. in the meeting room at 
Headquarters, 99 Marconi Station, Wellfleet, Massachusetts for the 
regular business meeting to discuss the following:
    1. Adoption of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting. (June 19, 2009).
    3. Reports of Officers.
    4. Reports of Subcommittees.
    5. Superintendent's Report.
     Update on Dune Shacks.
     Improved Properties/Town Bylaws.
     Wind Turbines/Cell Towers.
     Highlands Center Update.
     Alternate Transportation funding.
     Other construction projects.
     Land Protection.
    6. Old Business.
    7. New Business.
     Ocean initiatives.
    8. Date and agenda for next meeting.
    9. Public comment; and
    10. Adjournment.
    The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons 
will be able to attend the meeting in addition to Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such 
requests should be made to the park superintendent prior to the 
meeting. Further information concerning the meeting may be obtained 
from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 Marconi Site 
Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.

    Dated: August 3, 2009.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. E9-20133 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeGuatemala

# Guatemala

181 items

        -    Press Statement  		Guatemala National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Guatemala	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Guatemalan President-Elect Arévalo	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro	  September 5, 2023 
        -    		The United States Is Providing $30 Million to Build Healthy, Fertile Soils as Part of VACS	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Richard Verma Travels to Guatemala and Colombia	  September 1, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Election Results in Guatemala	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on A Strategy to Increase the Use of Local Organizations and Staff Section 7019(e) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2022 (Div. K, P.L.117-103) and House Report 117-84	  July 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Third Annual Transmission of the Section 353 Report to Congress	  Matthew MillerJuly 19, 2023 

previous page1…34567…19next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1999 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,851,725
<SECURITIES>                                13,032,153
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,433,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   337,364
<INVENTORY>                                  5,196,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,051,017
<PP&E>                                      35,672,355
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,668,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,429,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,472,169
<BONDS>                                      4,816,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       407,244
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,149,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,429,328
<SALES>                                     15,605,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,605,894
<CGS>                                       10,045,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,225,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                433,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (217,289)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,322)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2932 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2932

    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise the 
 requirements of that Act relating to the dissemination of scientific 
                         information on drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1996

    Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Upton, Mr. 
 Brewster, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. Lincoln, and Mr. Heineman) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise the 
 requirements of that Act relating to the dissemination of scientific 
                         information on drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISSEMINATION OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION.

    Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
355) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n)(1) The holder of an approved new drug application may 
distribute in any manner to a health professional (including a health 
provider or insurer) a reprint of an article in an independent peer-
reviewed medical textbook, journal, or medical compendium which 
includes information about the drug that is not in the package insert, 
if the reprint is accompanied by a copy of the package insert and a 
statement that the reprint includes information that has not been 
approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Reprints distributed 
under this subsection shall not be regulated as advertising or labeling 
and shall not be required to be submitted to the Secretary.
    ``(2) With respect to an approved indication for a new drug, and 
for any pharmacoeconomic information relating to a drug, the Secretary 
shall not take action to prevent the use of advertising or labeling 
(except the package insert) unless the Secretary determines in writing, 
after an informal hearing, that the advertising or labeling is likely 
to cause misuse of the drug in a way that is unsafe or ineffective.
    ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term `peer-reviewed 
journal' includes journals of medical societies associated with a 
certifying board of the American Board of Medical Specialties or an 
equivalent organization in health economics and such other journals as 
the Commissioner shall designate by regulation. This function may not 
be further delegated.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect upon the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Biovest International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2004 (the Report), I,
Steven Arikian, CEO, President & Chairman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Steven Arikian                                       
|Steven Arikian CEO, President &
Chairman October 12, 2004



A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# South Korea

504 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Efforts to Counter the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the Ministerial Conference of the Third Summit for Democracy	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 17, 2024Shilla HotelSeoul, Republic of Korea 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the Opening Ceremony of the Third Summit for Democracy	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 17, 2024Shilla HotelSeoul, Republic of Korea 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Deliver Remarks at the Third Summit for Democracy  	  March 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to the Republic of Korea and Indonesia	  March 15, 2024 
        -    		Travel to Austria, South Korea, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Israel, March 14-23, 2024	   
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 11, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		The U.S.-Republic of Korea Consultation on the Special Measures Agreement	  March 4, 2024 

previous page1234…51next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF FINANCE DIRECTOR



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OR THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Sportech PLC
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Speakman, Finance Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 30th day of
June 2004.



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ Gary Speakman
|Gary Speakman    
|Finance Director
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-31001 Conference Calendar

THEODORE JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, LOUISIANA REHABILITATION SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-3082-B

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Theodore Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order closing his lawsuit seeking review of the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Social Services’ decision to deny him tuition assistance without prejudice to his right to reopen proceedings after his state-court remedies are exhausted. This court must raise, sua sponte , the issue of its own jurisdiction, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660No. 03-31001 -2- (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. Nelson v. Foti , 707 F.2d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1983). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order from which appeal is taken. Johnson did not file his notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of the order closing his case. The October 14, 2003, notice of appeal is timely only as to the denial of his second motion to reopen. However, Johnson makes no argument challenging the denial of his motion to reopen and has thus waived the sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(9)(A). Consequently, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Nepal

80 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Nepal	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Nepal	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 7, 2021	  Jalina PorterMay 7, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Nepal	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Nepal	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Other Release  		Public Release of Foreign Security Forces Units Ineligible for Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and Arms Export Control Act Assistance Pursuant to the State Leahy Law:  CY 2018 	  July 15, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Nepal	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Nepal	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Nepal	  June 10, 2020 
        -    		Ramesh  Manandhar	  April 23, 2020 

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May  19,  2004

/s/  Brian  Bonar
-----------------
Brian  Bonar
Chairman,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
HomeRwanda

# Rwanda

110 items

        -    Remarks  		The U.S.-Rwanda Preparatory Meeting for the 2021 Peacekeeping Ministerial	  Stanley L. BrownJuly 21, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Rwanda	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 5 of the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-441)	  July 12, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Rwanda National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Rwanda	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Rwanda	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Rwanda	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Rwanda	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 25, 2021	  February 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 17, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 17, 2021 

previous page1…67891011next page

Back to Top
#### Mark WEBBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1975.

*236Robert W. Knight, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge.

Webber appeals from a judgment of guilt and a 15-year sentence, which followed a jury verdict against him, for conspiracy to commit the felony of kidnapping. Although we are convinced that the evidence is — albeit only barely so — sufficient to sustain the verdict, we reverse for a new trial because of two plainly harmful evidentiary errors committed below.

Webber was charged with and convicted of conspiracy to effect the kidnapping for ransom of the son of the owner of Felton’s supermarket in Plant City on September 14, 1973, a crime which was actually perpetrated on that date by three other men, Gill, Fleming and Anglin. On the representation by the prosecutor that the matter would be “connected up,” the trial judge permitted the introduction of extensive testimony, including that of the victims involved, of another similar crime committed by Gill, Fleming, and Anglin in Brandon, Florida, on the next day, September 15. The matter was never “connected up” to the defendant. In fact, it clearly and undisputedly appeared that Webber had nothing whatever to do with it. The Brandon kidnapping-extortion was conceived, planned and executed solely by the three active participants in the Plant City crime, only after the crime in the instant case had taken place (and had failed to reap the expected financial rewards.) It had not been discussed with Webber and was plainly not a part of the Plant City conspiracy in which he arguably *was*involved and of which he was alone charged. The Brandon crime was thus simply irrelevant to the charges against the defendant. The trial court therefore erred in permitting, and in failing to strike, the evidence before the jury which related to it.

In addition, an F. B. I. agent, Krout, was permitted to testify concerning statements made to him by the defendant while in his custody for an alleged Hobbs Act violation. Upon Krout’s giving him the Miranda warnings, Webber specifically declined to waive his rights and elected to remain silent. The record clearly demonstrates that Krout nevertheless continued to question him and even indicated that it would go easier with Webber if he cooperated ; and that statements received into evidence followed these questions and *237that promise. It was plainly improper for the questioning to proceed after Webber’s statement that it was not desired, and plainly erroneous to admit the statements which were the result of that interrogation. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, at 1612, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Reversed and remanded.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.