alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,524,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,022,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,666,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,423,000
<PP&E>                                       3,023,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,220,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,358,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,625,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,494,000
<COMMON>                                    32,445,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,153,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,358,000
<SALES>                                      4,695,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,295,000
<CGS>                                        2,045,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,045,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,519,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,269,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,131,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,131,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### LARA EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, v. ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF McPherson, Kansas, et al., Respondents.

No. 78-1963.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 16, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1979.

Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega, Miami, for petitioner.

Preddy, Kutner & Hardy, Miami, for respondents.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks relief by writ of certiora-ri from an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, dismissing its complaint against defendants/respondents for failure to attach to the complaint evidence of compliance with conditions precedent referred to in the insurance policy attached to the complaint. The evidence required was proof of loss statement and evidence of arbitration of the issues in controversy. We hold that petitioner is entitled to the relief sought as the complaint reveals the petitioner generally pled its compliance with all conditions precedent. Therefore, certiorari is granted and the order under review is quashed. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.120(c).

It is so ordered.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report [electronicresource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:N 51/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638291
 
September 17, 2019
# Austria

99 items

        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Austria	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Austria	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Austria	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Austria	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Austria	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Austria	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Austria	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Austria	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Austria	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Austria	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top
# Libya

130 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 18, 2022	  Vedant PatelNovember 18, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Situation in Libya	  September 23, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Libya	  September 9, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		The Appointment of Mr. Abdoulaye Bathily as Special Representative of the UN Secretary General for Libya	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 3, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Renews Calls for De-escalation in Libya	  Ned PriceAugust 22, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Libya	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 26, 2022	  Ned PriceJuly 26, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Libya	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Outcomes of the 50th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  July 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Situation in Libya	  June 24, 2022 

previous page1…34567…13next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from - Form
10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,138,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,331,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (116,667)
<INVENTORY>                                    152,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,988,335
<PP&E>                                         868,483
<DEPRECIATION>                               (307,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,823,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,446,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       343,877
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,497,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,823,694
<SALES>                                      8,564,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,564,435
<CGS>                                        1,331,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,656,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (29,920)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,576,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                   621,019
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            955,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   955,114
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07



</TABLE>
§ 525.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 525.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 525.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
#### Sheila DENMARK, Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 79-1767.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 4, 1980.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1980.

Craig M. Spanjers of Stanley, Wines, Williams & Smith, P.A., Auburndale, for appellant.

Donald G. Jacobsen of Lane, Massey, Trohn, Clarke, Bertrand & Smith, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, as we did in *Johns v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,*375 So.2d 320 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), based on the reasoning in *Williams v. Leatherby Insurance Company,*338 So.2d 70 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), *cert. denied,*345 So.2d 429 (Fla.1977). We cannot, as appellant urges, subscribe to the view that in every instance in which a motor vehicle is inoperable, its owner need not maintain security as required by Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1977). *See Sherman v. Reserve Insurance Company,*350 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); nor can we formulate, as both parties request, a hard and fast rule applicable to all situations involving the question of whether security is required. That question is essentially one of fact and for the trial court to resolve. *Compare Tapscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,*330 So.2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), *and Ward v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company,*375 So.2d 898 (Fla.1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2014

No. 04-14-00305-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.O.J.P., Et al., Children,

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01294

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant father J.P. appeals the trial court’s termination of his parental rights. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. In In re R.R., 

No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.), we 

held that in parental-termination appeals, a procedure akin to Anders is necessary to best protect 

the statutory right to counsel on appeal, to provide a procedural mechanism for counsel to fulfill 

his ethical obligations, to assist the court in deciding appeals, and to provide consistent 

procedures for all indigent litigants. In compliance with the procedure set out in Anders, 

appellant’s attorney has informed appellant of his right to file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 

954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 

177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). 

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within twenty (20) days from the 

date of this order. If appellant files a pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later 

than twenty days after the date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. We ORDER the 

motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further 

order of the court.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 800.1104 Manner of payment.

Parties to a transaction must pay any filing fee by electronic payment. The filing fee must be paid in U.S. dollars. Instructions for paying filing fees are available on the Committee's section of the Department of the Treasury website.
#### Wilbur H. McCORMICK, Appellant, v. Alonzo FOWLE f/u/b/o American Home Assurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 74-829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lamar Warren, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Carl D. Pfender, appellant, *v.*Lillian E. Pfender, respondent.

[Decided October 14th, 1929.]

*Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Golyer,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Merritt Lane,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor 'Berry, and reported in *104 N. J. Eq. 107.*

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Cynthia BROWN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. CC-986.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 30, 1980.

*1090Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham, Ross Barnett, Jr., Hermel Johnson, Jackson, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND REMAND FOR A NEW TRIAL

SUGG, Justice for the Court:

Cynthia Brown was convicted in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County for forgery and sentenced to twelve (12) years in the penitentiary. Defendant timely perfected her appeal to this Court by filing an appeal bond on August 17, 1977.

The record was not filed in this case and on March 27, 1979, the Attorney General filed a motion to affirm defendant’s conviction. The motion was sustained on April 16, 1979. On May 15, 1979, we sustained defendant’s motion to rescind affirmation of conviction and granted defendant thirty (30) days in which to file a transcript or a bill of exceptions.

Defendant filed a motion to set aside the judgment of conviction and to remand for a new trial. She alleged in her motion that she is unable to file a transcript of the testimony at her trial because the court reporter’s notes have been lost and, because of passage of time, it is impossible to reconstruct the testimony by a bill of exceptions.

The Attorney General filed a response in which he asserts:

> Due to circumstances beyond the control of the official court reporter and through no fault on her part or on the part of appellant, her counsel, or the state’s attorney, the notes and/or tapes of the proceedings at trial were lost and cannot be found after diligent search.

> Due to the passage of time since the 1977 trial of this case, it is impossible to reconstruct the record by a bill of exceptions.

The Attorney General then suggests that justice requires reversal of the conviction and a remand for a new trial.

Under the circumstances set forth above, we hold defendant is entitled to a reversal of her conviction and to a retrial on the indictment filed against her.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

All Justices concur.
| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By                : /s/ Frank West            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                Frank West               |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer |
|   |  Date:                November 14, 2005  |
# Algeria

100 items

        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Algeria	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 30, 2022El Mouradia Palace, Official ResidenceAlgiers, Algeria 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Algerian President Tebboune	  March 30, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 30, 2022U.S. Embassy AlgiersAlgiers, Algeria 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to Mission Algeria	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 30, 2022U.S. Embassy AlgiersAlgiers, Algeria 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Algiers International Trade Fair Launch Event with U.S. Companies	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 30, 2022U.S. Embassy AlgiersAlgiers, Algeria 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Commitments to Regional Security and Prosperity Underscore Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Algeria	  March 30, 2022 
        -    		Travel to Israel, the West Bank, Morocco, and Algeria, March 26-30, 2022	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Acting Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs Yael Lempert on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Israel, the West Bank, Morocco, and Algeria	  Ned PriceMarch 24, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Israel, the West Bank, Morocco, and Algeria	  Ned PriceMarch 24, 2022 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136253 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136253 

 COA: 269605 

Wayne CC: 04-005425-01

KEENAN LEE ROBINSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
#### Gary David LAZORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 99-6657.

#### In re Taylor.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Allen CARTER, Jr.

No. 63843.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Allen Carter, Jr., applying for remedial writs. Orleans Parish.

Writ denied.
HomePakistan

# Pakistan

295 items

        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (12851) – Air Transport Agreement	  April 29, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (12903) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  January 28, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Pakistan (12902) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  November 18, 1997 
        -    		Steven  Crowley	  November 21, 1979 
        -    DS Memorial  		Steven Crowley	  November 21, 1979 

previous page1…282930

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11



                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                           MARCH 31,
                                                    -----------------------
                                                       2000         1999
                                                    ----------   ----------
Net income                                          $  515,822   $  145,033
                                                    ==========   ==========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                            9,419,755    7,655,304

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options                313,348      393,782

Convertible preferred stock                                 --           --

Subtraction of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                         --           --
                                                    ----------   ----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                              9,733,103    8,049,086
                                                    ==========   ==========




Basic net income per share                          $     0.05   $     0.02
                                                    ==========   ==========


Diluted net income per share                        $     0.05   $     0.02
                                                    ==========   ==========
#### Steve HESSEN, Trustee, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-833.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 9, 1974.

Jack R. Rice, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Stuart Simon, County Atty., and Alan S. Gold, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Steve Hessen, Trustee, is the owner of undeveloped land which is located in the Baptist Hospital block in the Kendall area of southern Dade County. He appeals from a final judgment of the trial court denying his petition for certio-rari to review a resolution of the Board of County Commissioners changing the zoning restrictions on his property to a more restrictive use. Appellant’s property forms a part of the entire area contained in the former Larkins and Pierce tracts which were the subject of Metropolitan Dade County v. Pierce, Fla.App.1970, 236 So.2d 202, and Larkins v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 343. A portion of the former “Larkins tract” was also the subject of a recent appeal to this court. See Aronovitz v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.App. 3rd 1974, 290 So.2d 536. The factual basis of the present appeal differs from that dealt with in the Aronovitz opinion only in that in the present instance, the Zoning Appeals Board, by resolution, disapproved the proposed zoning change of appellant’s property and would have adhered to the zoning established pursuant to our mandate in Metropolitan Dade County v. Pierce, supra. At the time that the present appeal was called for oral argument, the appellee, Metropolitan Dade. County, conceded that the present appeal is governed by the principles set forth in the opinion of this court in Aronovitz v. Metropolitan Dade County, supra. Based upon this representation, oral argument was waived.

We conclude therefore, that upon the authority of Metropolitan Dade County v. Pierce, supra, Larkins v. Metropolitan Dade County, supra, and Aronovitz v. Metropolitan Dade County, supra, the judgment in this case must be reversed. Accordingly, the final judgment denying petition for certiorari in the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions to grant the petition and enter an order quashing the resolution of the Dade County Commission rezoning appellant’s property.

Reversed and remanded with directions.