alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gordon BOYD et al., Appellants, v. BOULEVARD NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, Appellee.

No. 74-1379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 14, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1975.

*552Lapidus & Hollander and Robert J. Schaffer, Miami, for appellants.

Paul, Landy & Beiley and Huber B. Parsons, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., NATHAN, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, non-residents, being four of the trustees of First Mortgage Investors, a Massachusetts Business Trust, who are the defendants in this action by the ap-pellee to recover on a promissory note given to it by First Mortgage Investors, have filed an interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motions to dismiss by which they challenged the substituted service upon them, made by serving a local agent on the theory of their doing business in this state, under § 48.071 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

We hold the appeal has merit, and that on the motions of said defendants the service upon them should have been quashed. With reference to service’ on the non-resident trustees on the theory upon which the plaintiff proceeded, which was that they are engaged in business in Florida, it was not shown that the present action is one which arose out of their doing business in this state, as required in the cited statute.

The note sued upon, a copy of which is attached to the complaint, 'shows it to have been made by First Mortgage Investors. It was not a note of or made by the trustees, and on its face negatived liability of the trustees. In denying the defendants’ motions, the court did not find that the said non-resident defendant trustees had done or were doing business in Florida, but found that “First Mortgage Investor's, a Massachusetts Business Trust, has, through persons who are named in their respective capacities as trustees thereof in the complaint herein, engaged in business in the State of Florida”.

The Massachusetts Business Trust, First Mortgage Investors, was shown to have complied with §. 609.02 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., to qualify it to transact business in Florida, and it has been held that under the law of Massachusetts a Business Trust of that state is an entity for the purpose of being' sued, and when sued can be served by serving one of the trustees. In Vischer v. Dow Jones & Co., 325 Ill.App. 104, 59 N. E.2d 884, 892, the court said: “ * * * *553The instant defendant [a Massachusetts Business Trust] was created under Chapter 182, Annotated Laws of Mass., Vol. 6, p. 72, and while it is not a corporation nor an association, it is a separate legal entity for the purpose of being sued. See Peterson v. Hopson, 306 Mass. 597, 612, 29 N.E.2d 140, 132 A.L.R. 1; Griswold v. United States, D.C., 36 F.Supp. 714, 719. Section 6 of the Massachusetts Act, G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 182, provides that such an association or trust may be sued in an action at law and its property shall be subject to attachment and execution in like manner as if it were a corporation and that service of process upon one of the trustees shall be sufficient.” * * *.

The order appealed from is reversed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2927

To amend the Fair Housing Act regarding local and State laws and

regulations governing residential care facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. CUNNINGHAM,

and Mr. FILNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Fair Housing Act regarding local and State

laws and regulations governing residential care facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 816 of the Fair Housing Act is amended by

4 adding at the end ‘‘Nothing in this title shall be construed

5 to invalidate or limit any reasonable local or State law or

6 regulation governing residential care facilities, including

7 laws and regulations governing the proximity of such fa8 cilities to each other, the maximum allowable number of

9 occupants, whether related or unrelated, of such a facility

10 or other dwelling, or the ownership, use, or occupancy of
2

•HR 2927 IH

1 a residential care facility by a convicted felon, registered

2 sex offender, or reeovering drug addict. As used in this

3 section, the term ‘residential care facility’ means a build4 ing or place that is maintained and operated to provide

5 sleeping accommodations, with or without food service, to

6 disabled individuals.’’.

Æ
```

[106th Congress Public Law 466]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ466.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2024]]

Public Law 106-466
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain irrigation 
 facilities to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District. <<NOTE: Nov. 
                         7, 2000 -  [S. 3022]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Nampa and Meridian 
Conveyance Act.>>  assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nampa and Meridian Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES.

    The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to as the 
``Secretary'') shall, as soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, convey facilities to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation 
District (in this Act referred to as the ``District'') in accordance 
with all applicable laws and pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum of 
Agreement (contract No. 1425-99MA102500, dated 7 July 1999) between the 
Secretary and the District. The conveyance of facilities shall include 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any 
portion of the canals, laterals, drains, and any other portion of the 
water distribution and drainage system that is operated or maintained by 
the District for delivery of water to and drainage of water from lands 
within the boundaries of the District.

SEC. 3. LIABILITY.

    Except <<NOTE: Effective date.>>  as otherwise provided by law, 
effective on the date of conveyance of facilities under this Act, the 
United States shall not be liable for damages of any kind arising out of 
any act, omission, or occurrence based on its prior ownership or 
operation of the conveyed property.

[[Page 114 STAT. 2025]]

SEC. 4. EXISTING RIGHTS NOT AFFECTED.

    Nothing in this Act affects the rights of any person except as 
provided in this Act. No water rights shall be transferred, modified, or 
otherwise affected by the conveyance of facilities and interests to the 
Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District under this Act. Such conveyance 
shall not affect or abrogate any provision of any contract executed by 
the United States or State law regarding any irrigation district's right 
to use water developed in the facilities conveyed.

    Approved November 7, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3022:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-480 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
# Jordan

210 items

        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Jordan	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Jordan	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Jordan	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Jordan	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (20-201) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions	  February 1, 2020 
        -    Report  		Jordan	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Jordan	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Jordan	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Jordan	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Jordan	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…1516171819…21next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel. Cancer Pathobiology ARRA CR.
    Date: September 18, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Elaine Sierra-Rivera, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6184, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 
20892. 301-435-1779. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67150e1102150614022704141549090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3918a958691829086a3809091cd8d8a8bcd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel. Neurodevelopment and Neurobiology.
    Date: September 30, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carol Hamelink, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5040H, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 
451-1328. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe7eee2eae3e6e1eccfecfcfda1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda5aca0a8a1a4a3ae8daebebfe3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 25, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-21046 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# lnventoryExpertService

Phone: 800·631-1 664. 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.orgtproducts/other-cas-proclucts/cllent-servicesl 

# INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES Order Nwnber: 350862-4 Registry NUlnber: 1456802-89-3 CA 

### Index Name: Oxirane, 2-methyh polymer 

### with oxirane, monohexadecyl ether, phosphate, anunonium salt CAS Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. If this box
Is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked

In red to your IES order. Please make 

### the same corrections



### to your 

### PMN before submitting



### it to the 

### EPA. 2540 Olentangy River Road 

### P.O. Box 

### 3343 Columbus,
OH 43210-0334
USA
#### § 582.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Nicaragua sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac.*
#### BISCAYNE BAY INVESTMENTS, LIMITED, INC., a Florida corporation, and Irvin Freedman, Appellants, v. Danny David COHEN, Appellee.

No. 73-1545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 4, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# North Korea

429 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues Turner’s Travel to Switzerland and the United Kingdom	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 11, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 29, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 29, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 26, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Senior Official for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Pak’s Video Conference with People’s Republic of China (PRC) Special Representative on Korean Peninsula Affairs Liu	  February 23, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Jenkins’ Remarks at the Korea Society on Deterring North Korea	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsFebruary 22, 2024New York City, New York 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 21, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 21, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    DipNote  		Countering the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  February 21, 2024 

previous page12345…43next page

Back to Top
HomeJapan

# Japan

594 items

        -    TIAS  		Japan (05-1001) – Agreement on Social Security, with Administrative Arrangement	  October 1, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (05-610.2) – Agreement for Cooperation on the Formulation Activity of the Global Precipitation Management (GPM) Program, with Memorandum of Understanding	  June 10, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (05-610.1) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on the Solar Physics Satellite (Solar-B) Project, with Memorandum of Understanding	  June 10, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (05-610) – Agreement for the X-Ray Astronomy Satellite (ASTRO-EII) Project, with Memorandum of Understanding	  June 10, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (05-218) – Agreement on Cooperation to Maintain Meteorological Satellite Observation over the Pacific Region through the Mutual Back-Up of Geostationary Meteorological Satellites	  February 18, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (04-330) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  March 30, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (03-425) – Agreement for Cooperation on the Mu Space Engineering Spacecraft-C (MUSES-C) Program	  April 25, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (02-712) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on the Second Balloon-Borne Superconducting Magnet Spectrometer Program	  July 12, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (13173) – Agreement Concerning Logistic Support, Supplies, and Services Contributed by Japan to the Armed Forces or Other Similar Entities of the United States	  November 16, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (99-1007) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on Anticompetitive Activities	  October 7, 1999 

previous page1…5657585960next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles THOMPSON.

No. 66439.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1980.

In re Calvin Charles Thompson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans. No. 259-144.

Writ granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from - Form
10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         283,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  656,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,805)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               960,806
<PP&E>                                         314,998
<DEPRECIATION>                               (150,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,395,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          613,246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       304,590
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,372,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,395,403
<SALES>                                      3,670,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,670,654
<CGS>                                          266,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,514,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (119,549)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,001,910
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,509,642)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,511,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        


</TABLE>
# C_2005217EN.01003801.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/38

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 July 2005

in Case T-385/03 Miles Handelsgesellschaft International mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Biker Miles’ - Earlier Community word mark MILES - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 217/84)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-385/03: Miles Handelsgesellschaft International mbH, established in Norderstedt (Germany), represented by F. Dettmann and A. Deutsch, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: T. Eichenberg and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being Biker Miles Motorrad Handels- und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH, established in Berlin (Germany), represented by G. Malchartzeck, lawyer — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2003 (Case R 174/2002-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Biker Miles Motorrad Handels- und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Miles Handelsgesellschaft International mbH — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2003 (Case R 174/2002-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2003 (Case R 174/2002-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 7.2.2004

1

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                      EXHIBIT 11.1

                                                     CENTENNIAL BANCORP
                                              COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                                             Year Ended December 31,     
                                                                    ----------------------------------------------
                                                                        1998             1997              1996   
                                                                     ----------        ---------         ---------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>               <C>    
Reconciliation of Income

Net income - basic                                                  $11,434,546       $9,303,363        $6,514,288

Income impact of assumed conversion of
    Convertible Debentures, net of taxes                                     --               --           363,358
                                                                     ----------       ----------        ----------
Income available to common
    shareholders - diluted                                          $11,434,546       $9,303,363        $6,877,646
                                                                    ===========       ==========        ==========

Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Shares

Weighted average shares outstanding                                  16,823,758       16,671,161        14,349,085

Incremental shares from stock options
    issued                                                              770,926          747,659           565,873

Incremental shares from assumed
    conversion of Convertible Debentures                                     --               --         2,114,838
                                                                     ----------        ---------         ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding -
    diluted                                                          17,594,684       17,418,820        17,029,796
                                                                     ==========       ==========        ==========

</TABLE>