44850 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Notices 

prior to disclosure, the agency 

determines that the records are both 

relevant and necessary to the litigation 

and the use of such records by the DOJ 

is therefore deemed by the agency to be 

for a purpose that is compatible with the 

purpose for which the agency collected 

the records. 

12. Disclosure may be made to a court 

or other tribunal, when: (a) The agency 

or any component thereof; or (b) any 

employee of the agency in his or her 

official capacity where the DOJ has 

agreed to represent the employee; or (c) 

the United States Government is a party 

to the proceeding or has an interest in 

such proceeding and, prior to 

disclosure, the agency determines that 

the records are both relevant and 

necessary to the proceeding and the use 

of such records is therefore deemed by 

the agency to be for a purpose that is 

compatible with the purpose for which 

the agency collected the records. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Records are stored in file folders, 

electronic and magnetic media and 

other types of data storage devices. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Records are retrieved by manual or 

computer search of the case-tracking 

system using the name of the 

respondent(s) (i.e., the individual or 

individuals who are the subject of an 

allegation of research misconduct or of 

a research misconduct proceeding). 

SAFEGUARDS: 

1. Authorized users: Records are 

available to the system manager, to the 

Director, ORI, and to other appropriate 

ORI staff when they have a need for the 

records in the performance of their 

duties. Records are also available to the 

head of intramural research for the PHS 

agency involved, and to other 

appropriate HHS officials, including 

attorneys in the Office of the General 

Counsel, the Agency Research Integrity 

Liaison Officer (ARILOs), the Agency 

Intramural Research Integrity Officer 

(AIRIOs), the Agency Extramural 

Research Integrity Officer (AERIOs), and 

the Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) 

located in the Institutes and Centers of 

the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 

that are involved in the research 

misconduct proceeding, when there is a 

need to know in the performance of 

their duties. All authorized users are 

informed that the records are 

confidential and are not to be further 

disclosed. 

2. Procedural safeguards: Access is 

strictly controlled by the system 

manager and the Director, ORI, in 

compliance with the Privacy Act and 

this system notice. Access to the records 

is limited to ensure confidentiality. All 

questions and inquiries from any party 

should be addressed to the system 

manager. 

3. Physical safeguards: ORI records 

are kept in locked file cabinets in a 

room that is locked during non-working 

hours. Access to this room is restricted 

to specific personnel. The ORI office 

suite is protected by access and 

intrusion alarms at the front and 

emergency entrances. Access to 

computer files is strictly limited through 

passwords and user-invisible 

encryption. Special measures 

commensurate with the sensitivity of 

the record are taken to prevent 

unauthorized copying or disclosure of 

the records. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

The files are retained and disposed of 

in accordance with the General Records 

Schedule (accessions) and a disposition 

schedule approved by the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(cases). 

SYSTEM MANAGER AND ADDRESS: 

Director, Division of Investigative 

Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 

1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750, 

Rockville, MD 20852. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: 

This system is exempt from access; 

however, consideration will be given to 

requests addressed to the system 

manager. The requester must verify his 

or her identity by providing either a 

notarization of the request or a written 

certification that the requester is who he 

or she claims to be and understands that 

the knowing and willful request for 

acquisition of a record pertaining to an 

individual under false pretenses is a 

criminal offense under the Privacy Act, 

subject to a five thousand dollar fine. 

The request should include: (a) Full 

name, (b) address, and (c) year of 

records in question. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Same as notification procedures. 

Requesters should reasonably specify 

the record contents being sought. 

Although the system is exempt, 

respondents may, upon request, receive 

records from this system and an 

accounting of disclosure of their 

records, if the system manager 

determines the disclosure would not 

compromise the activities of ORI or the 

confidentiality of information. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Exempt. However, consideration may 

be given to requests addressed to the 

system manager. Requests for 

corrections should reasonably identify 

the record and specify the information 

to be contested, the corrective action 

sought and the reasons for the 

corrections with supporting 

justification. The right to contest records 

is limited to information that is 

incomplete, irrelevant, incorrect, or 

obsolete. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Information in this system is received 

or obtained from many sources, 

including: (1) Directly from the 

respondent or complainant or his/her 

representative; (2) derived from 

materials supplied by the respondent or 

complainant or his/her representative; 

(3) from information supplied by the 

institutions, witnesses, scientific 

publications and other 

nongovernmental sources; (4) from 

observation and analysis made by ORI 

staff and scientific experts; (5) 

departmental and other Federal, State, 

and local government records; (6) from 

hearings and other administrative 

proceedings; and (7) from any other 

relevant source. 

SYSTEM EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT: 

This system is exempted pursuant to 

5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (k)(5) of the 

Privacy Act from access, notification, 

correction, and amendment provisions 

of the Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1)– 

(4), (e)(4)(G)–(H), and (f)). 

[FR Doc. E9–20893 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

Periodically, the Substance Abuse and 

Mental Health Services Administration 

(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of 

information collection requests under 

OMB review, in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

documents, call the SAMHSA Reports 

Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Notices 44851 

Project: Jail Diversion and Trauma 

Recovery—Priority to Veterans 

Program Evaluation—(OMB NO. 0930– 

0277)—Revision 

The Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration’s 

(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health 

Services (CMHS) has implemented the 

Targeted Capacity Expansion Grants for 

Jail Diversion Programs, and the Jail 

Diversion and Trauma Recovery 

Program represents the newest cohort of 

grantees. The Program currently collects 

client outcome measures from program 

participants who agree to participate in 

the evaluation. Data collection consists 

of interviews conducted at baseline, 6- 

and 12-month intervals. 

The current proposal requests: 

1. Substituting CMHS NOMS items 

for GPRA items. At the time of the 

previous OMB submission, the NOMS 

measures were not finalized. 

2. Replacing the DC trauma Screen 

with a new set of traumatic event 

questions. The new trauma questions 

better reflect the experiences of the 

target population. 

3. Replacing the Colorado Symptom 

Index with the BASIS 24. 

4. Adding questions related to 

military service experience at the 

baseline. These items will be added to 

capture characteristics of the target 

population of the new grantee cohort, 

veterans. 

5. Adding questions on military 

combat experience at the six month 

interview only. These items will capture 

the types of traumatic experiences 

among clients with a combat history. 

6. Adding questions on lifetime 

mental health/substance use and service 

use and the CAGE to the baseline. These 

questions will be added to capture 

client’s history of involvement with 

mental health and substance abuse 

systems, and the four CAGE items assess 

alcohol dependence. 

7. Adding several lifetime criminal 

justice questions. These questions will 

assess client’s lifetime involvement with 

the criminal justice system. 

8. Adding the Recovery Enhancing 

Environment (REE) instrument to all 

interviews. The REE is a consumer 

oriented measure of recovery, a new and 

important program outcome. 

9. Removing the MacArthur Perceived 

Coercion Scale from all instruments. 

10. Removing the Mental Health 

Statistics Improvement Program 

questions from follow-up interviews. 

(These are replaced by a similar, but 

shorter, NOMS scale.) 

The NOMS measures that are 

proposed for substitution of the GPRA 

measures have the same administration 

time and do not lengthen the interview. 

Two of the proposed additions (the REE 

and the lifetime MH/SA) will add 5 

minutes each and the criminal justice 

questions will add 3 minutes. The 

military service questions will add an 

average of 4 minutes, as not all 

respondents are expected to answer 

these questions because grantees may 

serve non-veteran clients. The removal 

of the MacArthur Coercion Instrument 

reduces the baseline interview by 5 

minutes and removal of the MHSIP 

reduces the follow-up interview by 5 

minutes. The net lengthening of the 

instrument is 12 minutes for the 

baseline interview, and there is no net 

increase in length to the 6- and 12- 

month interviews. 

The Program also collects data on 

program participants from records. The 

revisions to these instruments are 

formatting in nature. 

New grantees were awarded on 

September 30, 2008 under the Jail 

Diversion and Trauma Recovery 

Program will commence data collection 

efforts in FY 2009; anticipated grantees 

awarded on September 30, 2009 would 

commence data collection in FY 2010; 

and anticipated grantees awarded on 

September 30, 2010 would commence 

data collection in FY 2011. The 

following tables summarize the burden 

for the data collection. 

CY 2009 ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Data collection activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Average hours 

per response 

Total hour 

burden 

Client Interviews for FY 2008: Revised Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) 1 ................................................. 510 1 510 0 .95 485 

6 months .......................................................................... 408 1 408 0 .92 375 

12 months ........................................................................ 102 1 102 0 .92 94 

Sub Total .................................................................. 1,020 ........................ 1,020 ............................ 954 

Client Interviews for FY 2006–2007 Grantees: Current Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) ................................................... 70 1 70 0 .83 58 

6 months .......................................................................... 70 1 70 0 .92 64 

12 months ........................................................................ 58 1 58 0 .92 53 

Sub Total .................................................................. 35 ........................ 35 ............................ 32 

Record Management by FY 2007 and FY 2008 Grantee Staff 5

Events Tracking 2 ............................................................. 8 800 6,400 0 .03 192 

Person Tracking 3 ............................................................. 8 70 560 0 .1 36 

Service Use 4 ................................................................... 8 25 200 0 .17 34 

Arrest History 4 ................................................................. 8 25 200 0 .17 34 

Sub Total .................................................................. 32 ........................ 7,360 ............................ 296 

FY 2006 Grantees 

Interview and Tracking data submission ......................... 8 12 48 0 .17 8 

Overall Total ............................................................. 1,095 ........................ 8,415 ............................ 1,290 

1Only program enrollees who agree to participate in the evaluation receive a Baseline interview. 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
44852 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Notices 

2The number of responses per respondent for the Events Tracking depends on the design of the jail diversion program and can range from a 

single screening for eligibility to four separate screenings; here 800 responses represents the average number of responses per respondent for 

the period based on the experience of the previous Grantees. 3This estimate is an added burden proportion which is an adjustment reflecting the extent to which programs typically already collect the data 

items. The formula for calculating the proportion of added burden is: total number of items in the standard instrument, minus the number of core 

items currently included, divided by the total number of items in the standard instrument. For the Person Tracking program the burden estimate 

was calculated as follows: 56 times 0.65 (the proportion of added burden) = 36. 4 Record management forms (Service Use and Arrest) are only completed for those evaluation participants who receive both a Baseline interview and at least one follow-up (6- and/or 12-month) interview. 5Assumes 1 respondent at grantee site is responsible for compiling the information. 

CY 2010 ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Data collection activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Average hours 

per 

response 

Total hour 

burden 

Client Interviews for FY 2008 and Anticipated FY 2009: Revised Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) 1 ............................................... 1,110 1 1,110 0 .95 1,055 

6 months ........................................................................ 888 1 888 0 .92 817 

12 months ...................................................................... 491 1 490 .6 0 .92 451 

Sub total .................................................................. 2,489 ........................ 2,489 ............................ 2,323 

Client Interviews for FY 2007 Grantees: Current Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) ................................................. 0 1 0 0 .83 0 

6 months ........................................................................ 20 1 20 0 .92 18 

12 months ...................................................................... 15 1 15 0 .92 14 

Sub total .................................................................. 35 ........................ 35 ............................ 32 

Record Management by FY 2007, FY 2008 FY 2009 Grantee Staff 5

Events Tracking 2 ........................................................... 14 800 11,200 0 .03 336 

Person Tracking 3 ........................................................... 14 80 1,120 0 .1 62 

Service Use 4 ................................................................. 14 50 700 0 .17 119 

Arrest History 4 ............................................................... 14 50 700 0 .17 119 

Sub total .................................................................. 56 ........................ 13,720 ............................ 636 

FY 2008 and FY 2009 Grantees 

Interview and Tracking data submission ....................... 12 12 48 0 .17 8 

Overall Total ........................................................... 2,592 ........................ 16,292 ............................ 2,999 

1Since enrollment is anticipated to have ended for these Grantees by the end of CY 2009 there is no Baseline burden in CY 2010. 

2The number of responses per respondent for the Events Tracking depends on the design of the jail diversion program and can range from a 

single screening for eligibility to four separate screenings; here 800 responses represents the average number of respondents. 3This estimate is an added burden proportion which is an adjustment reflecting the extent to which programs typically already collect the data 

items. The formula for calculating the proportion of added burden is: total number of items in the standard instrument, minus the number of core 

items currently included, divided by the total number of items in the standard instrument. For the Person Tracking program the burden estimate 

was calculated as follows: 96 times 0.65 (the proportion of added burden) = 62. 4 Record management forms (Service Use and Arrest) are only completed for those evaluation participants who receive both a Baseline interview and at least one follow-up (6- and/or 12-month) interview. 5Assumes 1 respondent at grantee site is responsible for compiling the information. 

CY 2011 ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Data collection activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Average hours 

per response 

Total hour 

burden 

Client Interviews for FY 2008 and Anticipated FY 2009 and 2010: Revised Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) 1 ............................................. 1,710 1 1,710 0 .83 1,419 .3 

6 months ...................................................................... 1,368 1 1,368 0 .92 1,258 .56 

12 months .................................................................... 879 1 879 0 .92 808 .68 

Sub total ................................................................ 3,957 ........................ 3,957 ............................ 3,487 

Record Management by FY 2008 and Anticipated FY 2009 and FY 2010 Grantee Staff 5

Events Tracking 2 ......................................................... 18 800 14,400 0 .03 432 

Person Tracking 3 ......................................................... 18 80 1,440 0 .1 94 

Service Use 4 ............................................................... 18 50 900 0 .17 153 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Notices 44853 

CY 2011 ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN—Continued 

Data collection activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Average hours 

per response 

Total hour 

burden 

Arrest History 4 ............................................................. 18 50 900 0 .17 153 

Sub total ................................................................ 72 ........................ 17,640 ............................ 832 

FY 2008 and FY 2009 Grantees 

Interview and Tracking data submission ..................... 18 12 48 0 .17 8 

Overall total ........................................................... 4,047 ........................ 21,645 ............................ 4,327 

1Since enrollment is anticipated to have ended for these Grantees by the end of CY 2009 there is no Baseline burden in CY 2010. 

2The number of responses per respondent for the Events Tracking depends on the design of the jail diversion program and can range from a 

single screening for eligibility to four separate screenings; here 800 responses represents the average number of respondents. 3This estimate is an added burden proportion which is an adjustment reflecting the extent to which programs typically already collect the data 

items. The formula for calculating the proportion of added burden is: total number of items in the standard instrument, minus the number of core 

items currently included, divided by the total number of items in the standard instrument. For the Person Tracking program the burden estimate 

was calculated as follows: 144 times 0.65 (the proportion of added burden) = 94. 4 Record management forms (Service Use and Arrest) are only completed for those evaluation participants who receive both a Baseline interview and at least one follow-up (6- and/or 12-month) interview. 5Assumes 1 respondent at grantee site is responsible for compiling the information. 

CY 2012 ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN

Data collection activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Average hours 

per response 

Total hour 

burden 

Client Interviews for Anticipated FY 2009 and FY 2010: Revised Instrument 

Baseline (at enrollment) 1 ............................................. 1,200 1 1,200 0 .83 996 

6 months ...................................................................... 1,080 1 1,080 0 .92 993 .6 

12 months .................................................................... 1,084 1 1,084 0 .92 997 .28 

Sub total ................................................................ 3,364 ........................ 3,364 ............................ 2,987 

Record Management by Anticipated FY 2009 and FY 2010 Grantee Staff 5

Events Tracking 2 ......................................................... 12 800 9,600 0 .03 288 

Person Tracking 3 ......................................................... 12 70 840 0 .1 55 

Service Use 4 ............................................................... 12 25 300 0 .17 51 

Arrest History 4 ............................................................ 12 25 300 0 .17 51 

Sub total ................................................................ 48 ........................ 11,040 ............................ 445 

FY 2008 and FY 2009 Grantees 

Interview and Tracking data submission ..................... 12 12 48 0 .17 8 

Overall total ........................................................... 3,424 ........................ 14,452 ............................ 3,440 

1Since enrollment is anticipated to have ended for these Grantees by the end of CY 2009 there is no Baseline burden in CY 2010. 

2The number of responses per respondent for the Events Tracking depends on the design of the jail diversion program and can range from a 

single screening for eligibility to four separate screenings; here 800 responses represents the average number of respondents. 3This estimate is an added burden proportion which is an adjustment reflecting the extent to which programs typically already collect the data 

items. The formula for calculating the proportion of added burden is: total number of items in the standard instrument, minus the number of core 

items currently included, divided by the total number of items in the standard instrument. For the Person Tracking program the burden estimate 

was calculated as follows: 84 times 0.65 (the proportion of added burden) = 55. 4 Record management forms (Service Use and Arrest) are only completed for those evaluation participants who receive both a Baseline interview and at least one follow-up (6- and/or 12-month) interview. 5Assumes 1 respondent at grantee site is responsible for compiling the information. 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
44854 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 167 / Monday, August 31, 2009 / Notices 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by September 30, 2009 to: 

SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, Office 

of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503; due to potential 

delays in OMB’s receipt and processing 

of mail sent through the U.S. Postal 

Service, respondents are encouraged to 

submit comments by fax to: 202–395– 

5806. 

Dated: August 19, 2009. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Program Services. 

[FR Doc. E9–20900 Filed 8–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[Docket No. 60Day–09–09CJ] 

Proposed Data Collections Submitted 

for Public Comment and 

Recommendations 

In compliance with the requirement 

of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for 

opportunity for public comment on 

proposed data collection projects, the 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic 

summaries of proposed projects. To 

request more information on the 

proposed projects or to obtain a copy of 

the data collection plans and 

instruments, call 404–639–5960 or send 

comments to Maryam Daneshvar, CDC 

Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton 

Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or 

send an e-mail to omb@cdc.gov. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. Written comments should 

be received within 60 days of this 

notice. 

Proposed Project 

Promoting HIV Testing among Low 

Income, Young, Heterosexual Black 

Men—New—National Center for HIV/ 

AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually 

Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis 

Elimination Programs (NCHHSTP), 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The lifetime risk of acquiring HIV 

infection for black men is 1 in 16. 

Heterosexual transmission is the second 

highest category for HIV infection 

among black men, yet we know little 

about how to successfully access 

heterosexual black men with HIV 

prevention and texting messages. CDC is 

requesting OMB approval for 2 years to 

collect data for this 3-phase study. 

The purpose of the proposed study is 

to elicit attitudes about HIV testing 

among a community-based sample of 

non-Hispanic black, heterosexual men, 

ages 18–25, who are recently arrested 

and/or released from jail/prison. The 

study will develop culturally-tailored 

and gender-specific educational 

materials that promote HIV testing 

among this population. The data 

collection process will take 

approximately 2 years. 

In Phase 1, local investigators will 

conduct qualitative interviews with 20 

non-Hispanic black, heterosexual men, 

ages 18–25, who are recently arrested 

and/or released from jail/prison and 

meet screening criteria. The interviews 

will identify their attitudes towards HIV 

testing, socio-cultural norms, and 

perceived behavioral control factors that 

influence HIV testing. The interviews 

will also elicit their opinions of how to 

promote HIV testing among their peers. 

Each interview will last approximately 

1.5 hours. During Phase 2, the results 

from Phase 1 will be used to identify 

variables for a survey that will examine 

attitudes towards HIV testing, sociocultural norms, and perceived 

behavioral control factors to HIV testing 

intentions and behaviors. The survey 

will include 250 non-Hispanic black 

heterosexual men, ages 18–25, who 

meet screening criteria. Each survey will 

last approximately 30 minutes. 

During Phase 3, using Phase 1 and 2 

results, educational materials promoting 

HIV testing among 24 non-Hispanic 

black heterosexual men will be 

developed and pilot tested in focus 

groups of young black men who meet 

screening criteria to evaluate the 

acceptability of the materials. 

This study will provide important 

epidemiologic information useful for the 

development of HIV prevention 

interventions for young black men. 

There is no cost to respondents except 

for their time. 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Form name Type of respondents Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average burden per responses 

(hours) 

Hours 

Screener for one-on-one interviews Non-Hispanic, black, heterosexual 

men, ages 18–25, recently arrested and/or released from jail/ 

prison.

30 1 10/60 5 

One-on-one interviews ...................... ........................................................... 20 1 1.5 30 

Screener for surveys ......................... ........................................................... 300 1 10/60 50 

Surveys ............................................. ........................................................... 250 1 30/60 125 

Screener for focus groups ................ ........................................................... 40 1 10/60 7 

Focus groups .................................... ........................................................... 24 1 2 48 

Total Burden Hours ................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 265 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES