alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 589.507 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 589.506(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 589.506(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) *Email (preferred method): OFACReport@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) *U.S. mail:* OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Tyrone ADDISON v. Alvin V. OSER, Judge, Section “J”, Orleans Parish, Criminal Judicial District Court.

No. 65797.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Tyrone Addison, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 261— 941.

Writ denied.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
# C_2005155EN.01001301.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 13 April 2005

in Case T-353/02 Duarte y Beltrán SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark INTEA - Earlier national word marks INTESA - Refusal of registration - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 155/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-353/02: Duarte y Beltrán SA, established in Santander (Spain), represented initially by N. Moya Fernandez, and subsequently by J. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, lawyers, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: M. Schneider and P. Jurado Montejano), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Mirato SpA, established in Novara (Italy) — action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 August 2002 (Case R 407/2001-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Duarte y Beltrán SA and Mirato SpA — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N. J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; B. Pastor, Assistant Registrar, has given a judgment on 13 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  JO C 44 of 22.2.2003.

1

---
#### § 597.312 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest* when used with respect to funds or assets (e.g., “an interest in funds”) means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
# Ghana

111 items

        -    Report  		Ghana	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Ghana	  June 27, 2017 
        -    		International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEAs)	   
        -    Report  		Ghana	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Ghana (16-906) – Millennium Challenge Compact Agreement	  September 6, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Sub-Saharan Africa – Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Small Grants (Summary)	  August 7, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		Ghana/Partnership For Growth – Mid Term Evaluation – Final Report [PDF]	  March 16, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		Tanzania/Partnership For Growth – Mid Term Evaluation – Final Report [PDF]	  March 14, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		The Philippines/Partnership for Growth [Archive]	  February 1, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Ghana (08-117) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation in Medical Research	  January 17, 2009 

previous page1…89101112next page

Back to Top
# C_2005155EN.01000802.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/8

---

Action brought on 21 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-179/05)

(2005/C 155/16)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Nolin, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to provide the Commission with the information required under Article 18(1) and the first and third indents of Article 19i of Regulation No 2847/93 (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to provide the Commission with the information required under Article 18(1) and the first and third indents of Article 19i of Regulation No 2847/93 (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation;

1

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| — | With regard to the information required under Article 18(1) of Regulation No 2847/93, the French authorities have still not provided this for 1999 or 2000. Moreover, for the subsequent years, that information has been provided late. |
| --- | --- |

—

With regard to the information required under Article 18(1) of Regulation No 2847/93, the French authorities have still not provided this for 1999 or 2000. Moreover, for the subsequent years, that information has been provided late.

| — | With regard to the information required under Article 19i of Regulation No 2847/93, the French authorities have not provided this for 1999, 2000, 2001 or 2002. Nor has that information has been provided for subsequent years. |
| --- | --- |

—

With regard to the information required under Article 19i of Regulation No 2847/93, the French authorities have not provided this for 1999, 2000, 2001 or 2002. Nor has that information has been provided for subsequent years.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1).

1

---
#### The Chevra Bnei Israel Aushe Yanova und Motal, Appellant, *v.*The Chevra Bikur Cholim Aushe Rodof Sholem, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

April, 1898.)

Appeal's — Exceptions cannot be considered where the record is defective.

The Appellate Term cannot consider exceptions, filed to findings of . fact which are alleged to have been made by a justice of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, where' the record does not contain his findings or decision; nor can the question of the loss of jurisdiction, through alleged illegal adjournments, be considered, where the record does not state the dates of the several adjournments nor at whose instance they were granted.

Exceptions to certain findings of fact, in returns.

Abraham B. Schleimer, for appellant.

Abraham H. Sarasohn, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Exceptions were filed in each case to certain findings of fact stated to have been made by the justice on the 17th day' of January, 1898. Neither of the returns contains such findings or decision. If made, they should be annexed to the return, and if not'made, then the record should be amended by inserting a statement to that effect.

The appellant claims that the justice adjourned the trial of these causes from the 13th to the 15th day of October, 1897, without good cause shown,' at the request of the defendant, and against plaintiff’s objection, and that in consequence .thereof the justice’s jurisdiction over it was lost. The return in Action No. 1 shows that issue therein was joined on the 2d day of July, 1897, and that the cause “was thereupon adjourned until the 30th day of July, 1897, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon, and from time to time again until the 14th day of January, 1898,” wheni the action was tried. The return in Action No. 2 shows that issue therein was joined on the 9th day of July, 1897, ,and that the cause “ was thereupon adjourned until 15th day of October, 1897, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon, and from time to time again until the 14th day of January, 1898, ” when thé case was tried*.*

*368It will be observed that the returns fail to specify the date of the adjournments and at whose instance they were had. Therefore such returns should be amended by having inserted therein the specific adjournments, and, if opposed, by whom. If any papers •were filed on applications for postponement, the justice should annex the same, or copies thereof, to the return.

■ For these reasons a reargument- must be ordered, the -return to be ■ amended meanwhile.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gtldebslbeve and Giegebioh, JJ.

Reargument ordered; return to be amended.
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-46831, 33-54937, 33-63133, 33-15871, 333-36601, 333-45245, 333-77559, 333-64279, 333-35124, 333-42446, 333-59162,333-61742, 333-100978, 333-112148, 333-122231, 333-128376, 333-131423, 333-138205, 333-149751) of Integrated Device Technology, Inc. of our report dated May 19, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, consolidated financialstatement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

May 19, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, February 3, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

 [FR Doc. E9-2089 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Guyana Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Guyana Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges**

Guyana is a transit country for cocaine destined for the United States, Canada, the Caribbean, Europe, and West Africa. Guyana faces significant challenges from weak and sometimes corrupt democratic institutions, underdeveloped infrastructure, and poverty.

**Goals**

The United States seeks to foster a democratic and stable Guyana that protects citizen security by increasing respect for the rule of law. INL assistance under the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) in Guyana aims to strengthen the integrity and capacity of Guyana’s criminal justice system, including police, prosecutors, and magistrates, to deter the trafficking of cocaine and enhance citizen security.

**Accomplishments**

In 2019, as a result of INL’s engagement, Guyana completed the first successful fugitive extradition to the United States in nearly 20 years. The extradition of a murder suspect to the United States established a model for future bilateral cooperation that will reduce Guyana’s attractiveness as a safe haven for criminals.

Tags

CrimeDrugsGuyanaLaw EnforcementNarcotics

Back to Top
# Afghanistan

525 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 28, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 25, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 25, 2024Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		CARE Coordinator Tekach’s Travel to Texas	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 6, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 6, 2024Washington, D.C. 

123…53next page

Back to Top
|   | EXHIBIT      32.2 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION1350 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002) |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY  /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Connie      Woods Hawkins     |
|   | Title:  Chief      Financial Officer |
|   |  Date:  November      9, 2009   |

----
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 256.60 How do I get paid for a Private Relief Bill?

You may apply for payment by sending a request letter along with supporting documentation, to include a copy of the private relief act and proof of your identity, to the address specified on the Fiscal Service Web site at *http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/privaterelief.*
§ 802.241 U.S. business. The term *U.S. business* means any entity, irrespective of the nationality of the persons that control it, engaged in interstate commerce in the United States. Note 1 to § 802.241 :
See examples to definition in § 800.252.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Announcement of Visa Restrictions Against Cuban Officials

# 									Announcement of Visa Restrictions Against Cuban Officials							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 30, 2021

In the wake of the Cuban regime’s actions targeting peaceful demonstrators on November 15, the Department of State has imposed visa restrictions on nine Cuban officials implicated in attempts to silence the voices of the Cuban people through repression and unjust detentions. The Department implemented these targeted actions pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 5377, which suspends nonimmigrant entry into the United States of officers and employees of the Cuban government.  These nine individuals include high-ranking members of the Ministries of the Interior and the Revolutionary Armed Forces.

In the days preceding November 15, the Cuban regime bullied activists with government-sponsored mobs, confined journalists and opposition members to their homes, revoked journalists’ credentials to suppress freedom of the press, and arbitrarily detained Cuban citizens who attempted to peacefully protest. The designated individuals today took action to deny Cubans their rights to free expression and peaceful assembly.  The rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly are universal.

These visa restrictions advance our goal of supporting the Cuban people and promoting accountability not only for regime leaders but also for officials who enable the regime’s assaults on democracy and human rights.  The United States continues to use all our diplomatic and economic tools to push for the release of political prisoners and to support the Cuban people’s call for greater freedoms and accountability.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCubaHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateVisas

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Annual Report of Muscle Maker, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ferdinand Groenewald,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | Such
    Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|2. | The information
    contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018, fairly presents, in all material respects,
    the financial condition and results of operations of Muscle Maker, Inc.



|By: | /s/
    Ferdinand Groenewald                                                               | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Ferdinand Groenewald                                                                       | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
    Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | 
|    | November
    22, 2019                                                                      |