alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
                                                          AMBANC Corp.
                                           Computation of Earnings Per Share Earnings
                                              with Common Stock Options Outstanding
                                                     (Treasury Stock Method)

<CAPTION>

                                                  1996(a)                        1995(a)                      1994(a)
                                                             Fully                          Fully                       Fully
                                             Primary        Diluted       Primary          Diluted      Primary        Diluted
<S>                                      <C>         <C>             <C>             <C>          <C>                <C>
Average Shares:
  Outstanding Common Shares             3,315,808      3,315,543        3,316,264      3,316,267        3,313,716   3,315,844
  Common Stock Equivalents:
    Stock Options                          26,460         26,460           26,460         26,460           26,460      26,460

Assumed Repurchase of
  Treasury Shares                         (16,707)       (16,707)(b)      (16,349)       (16,349)(b)      (16,222)    (16,222)(b)

Average Common and Common
  Equivalent Shares Outstanding         3,325,561      3,325,296        3,326,375      3,326,378        3,323,954   3,326,122

Net Income in $1,000                        7,966          7,966            7,045          7,045            6,502       6,502

Earnings Per Common and
  Common Equivalent Share                   $2.40          $2.40            $2.12          $2.12            $1.96       $1.95
</TABLE>

(a)     The above schedule has been restated to reflect
        AMBANC Corp. shares issued in merger transactions
        consisting of 569,454 on June 1, 1994, and 668,235
        on November 1, 1995, and the effect on net income
        of these merger transactions booked under the
        pooling of interests method of accounting and 5%
        stock dividends issued to shareholders on December
        2, 1996 and November 30, 1995.

(b)     Because it was higher, average price not ending
        price was used for repurchase assumption.




AM\9610KAMB.11
# Gabon

66 items

        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Gabon	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Gabon	  August 18, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		The Gabonese Republic National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 17, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Gabon	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Gabon	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Gabon	  June 2, 2022 
        -    		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Foreign Ministers from Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritania, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, and Senegal Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 18, 2022United Nations HeadquartersNew York, New York 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese Foreign Minister Michael Moussa Adamo	  May 6, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Briefing with Deputy Secretary of State, Wendy Sherman	  Wendy R. ShermanMay 6, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese Defense Minister Ngoubili	  May 6, 2022 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
DISMISS; Opinion Filed October 20, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00652

- CV

JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS , Appellant V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 00955

- B



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Myers Opinion by Justice Myers Appellant’s br ief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 8, 2014, we informed appellant that the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed him to file both his brief as well as a motion to extend time to file the brief within ten days of the date o f the postcard. We cautioned appellant that the failure to file a brief and extension motion within the time stated would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or an extension motion, nor has he otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his appeal. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

140652F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00652

- CV V.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 009 55

- B. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Chief Justice Wright and Justice Francis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION recover its

cos ts, if any, of this appeal from appellant JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS.

Judgment entered this 20th day of October, 2014.
#### § 802.222 Hold.

The terms *hold(s)* and *holding* mean legal or beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, whether through fiduciaries, agents, or other means.
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
             ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K (the "Report)for the period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Andrew I. Sealfon, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
Andrew I. Sealfon
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Date: June 1, 2010
# Bhutan

28 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Bhutan	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bhutan	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bhutan	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Bhutan	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bhutan	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bhutan	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Bhutan	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Bhutan	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Bhutan	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Bhutan	  March 13, 2019 

previous page123next page

Back to Top
# Belgium

251 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues Turner’s Trip to Brussels	  November 14, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to France and Belgium	  November 9, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Brussels	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Brussels, Belgium: The International School of Brussels: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Angola, Zambia, DRC, and Belgium	  October 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez Travels to Berlin, Paris, Brussels, Rome, and London	  September 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara Travel to Brussels	  September 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Belgium	  September 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Mike Hammer Travels to Stockholm and Brussels	  August 18, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 

previous page1…34567…26next page

Back to Top
# Europeiska unionens C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-1061
  doi:10.3000/19771061.C_2012.040.swe |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 40 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 55 årgången11 februari 2012 |

ISSN 1977-1061

doi:10.3000/19771061.C_2012.040.swe

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 40

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

55 årgången11 februari 2012

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Europaparlamentet |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Beslut | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europaparlamentet

2012/C 040/01

Beslut

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europaparlamentet

| 11.2.2012 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 40/1

---

BESLUT

2012/C 40/01

EUROPAPARLAMENTETS GENERALSEKRETERARE HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUT

med beaktande av tjänsteföreskrifterna för tjänstemän i Europeiska unionen och anställningsvillkoren för övriga anställda i Europeiska unionen, som fastställs genom rådets förordning (EEG, Euratom, EKSG) nr 259/68, senast ändrad genom rådets förordning (EG, Euratom) nr 723/2004, särskilt artikel 30,

med beaktande av presidiets beslut om utnämning av tillsättningsmyndigheten, senast ändrat den 26 oktober 2004,

med beaktande av meddelandena om de allmänna uttagningsproven

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S och PE/110/S,

med beaktande av ett yttrande som den partssammansatta kommittén avgav vid sitt sammanträde den 26 oktober 2011.

HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.

Enda artikel

Giltighetstiden för förteckningarna över godkända sökande från de allmänna uttagningsproven

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S och PE/110/S

förlängs till och med den 31 december 2012.

Utfärdat i Luxemburg den 18 december 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Generalsekreterare

---
www.gpo.gov

#### Subtitle B—Regulatory Provisions

        

#### part 2—participation and vesting

*l*

        

#### part 3—funding

        

#### part 4—fiduciary responsibility

        

#### part 5—administration and enforcement

*l*

        

#### part 6—continuation coverage and additional standards for group health plans

        

#### part 7—group health plan requirements

#### Subpart A—Requirements Relating to Portability, Access, and Renewability

        

#### Subpart B—Other Requirements

        

#### Subpart C—General Provisions

        

#### SUBCHAPTER II—JURISDICTION, ADMINISTRATION, ENFORCEMENT; JOINT PENSION TASK FORCE, ETC.

#### Subtitle A—Jurisdiction, Administration, and Enforcement

        

#### Subtitle B—Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force; Studies

        

#### part 2—other studies

        

#### Subtitle C—Enrollment of Actuaries

        

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PLAN TERMINATION INSURANCE

#### Subtitle A—Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

        

#### Subtitle B—Coverage

        

#### Subtitle C—Terminations

        

#### Subtitle D—Liability

        

#### Subtitle E—Special Provisions for Multiemployer Plans

        

#### part 2—merger or transfer of plan assets or liabilities

        

#### part 3—reorganization; minimum contribution requirement for multiemployer plans

        

#### part 4—financial assistance

        

#### part 5—benefits after termination

        

#### part 6—enforcement

        

#### Subtitle F—Transition Rules and Effective Dates

        

#### Chapter Referred to in Other Sections

This chapter is referred to in section 441 of this title; title 7 section 1a; title 15 sections 77b, 631b, 662; title 18 section 1027; title 20 section 1085; title 26 sections 412, 414; title 26 section 404; title 31 section 9502; title 42 sections 1395w–22, 1396s, 3035r; title 45 section 743.
698 A.2d 1305

#### Andrea BRUCK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 30, 1997.

Decided Sept. 17, 1997.

Edwin P. Smith, for appellant.

Andrew J. Gallogly, for appellee.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J. and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

*525ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 1997, the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ., dissent.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2764

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize veterans who are totally

disabled as the result of a service-connected disability to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as retired

members of the Armed Forces are authorized to travel on such aircraft.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 12, 1995

Mr. WELDON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize veterans

who are totally disabled as the result of a service-connected disability to travel on military aircraft in the

same manner and to the same extent as retired members

of the Armed Forces are authorized to travel on such

aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2764 IH

1 SECTION 1. TRAVEL OF DISABLED VETERANS ON MILITARY

2 AIRCRAFT.

3 (a) AUTHORITY.—Chapter 157 of title 10, United

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2641

5 the following:

6 ‘‘§ 2641a. Travel of disabled veterans on military air7 craft

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall

9 allow veterans who are authorized under laws adminis10 tered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive com11 pensation for a service-connected disability rated total in

12 degree under section 1155 of title 38, United States Code,

13 to travel on unscheduled military flights within the con14 tinental United States and on scheduled overseas flights

15 operated by the Air Mobility Command in the same man16 ner and to the same extent as retired members of the

17 armed forces are authorized by regulation to so travel.

18 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘vet19 eran’, ‘compensation’, and ‘service-connected’ have the

20 meanings given such terms in section 101 of title 38,

21 United States Code.’’.

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting

24 after the item relating to section 2641 the following:

‘‘2641a. Travel of disabled veterans on military aircraft.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Biovest International, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K/A), I, Steven Arikian, M.D., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 28, 2008



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven Arikian                               
|Steven Arikian, M.D.                             
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Biovest International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Resources
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of Language Services...Contact Us – Office of Language Services

# 									Contact Us – Office of Language Services							

#### For interpreting or translating services, please e-mail us at:

Interpreting: interpreters@state.govTranslating: **translation@state.gov**

#### For application inquiries, please e-mail us at:

LSonlineapps@state.gov

#### The Office of Language Services is located at:

U.S. Department of StateOffice of Language Services – SA-1Fourteenth Floor2401 E Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20522

Back to Top
# Kyrgyzstan

96 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Kyrgyz Republic	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Kyrgyz Republic	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the C5+1 Virtual Ministerial	  May 4, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with the C5+1	  April 23, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Kyrgyz Republic	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Kamchybek Kolbaev	  March 9, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Department of State Offers Reward Increase for Information to Bring Transnational Criminal to Justice	  Ned PriceMarch 4, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Anti-Corruption and Transparency  		Recognizing Anticorruption Champions Around the World	  James A. WalshFebruary 23, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Kyrgyz Republic	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Kyrgyz Republic	  June 25, 2020 

previous page1…5678910next page

Back to Top
1

D'Agostino, Kathleen

From: DELONEY, SCOTT [SDELONEY@idem.IN.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:38 PM

To: D'Agostino, Kathleen; sagoff, kendra; Aburano, Douglas

Cc: CALLAHAN, BRIAN

Subject: RE: ammonia and VOC emissions inventories

Our intent is in fact for the referenced inventory data to serve as the comprehensive emissions inventory for VOCs and 

ammonia per the requirements associated with the Clean Air Act. 

From: D'Agostino, Kathleen [mailto:dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 2:34 PM 

To: DELONEY, SCOTT; sagoff, kendra; Aburano, Douglas 

Cc: CALLAHAN, BRIAN 

Subject: RE: ammonia and VOC emissions inventories 

To make it official, would you please clarify that you intend these inventories to meet the comprehensive emissions 

inventory requirement of the Clean Air Act it applies to ammonia and VOCs? Thank you. 

From: DELONEY, SCOTT [mailto:SDELONEY@idem.IN.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 12:50 PM 

To: D'Agostino, Kathleen; sagoff, kendra; Aburano, Douglas 

Cc: CALLAHAN, BRIAN 

Subject: RE: ammonia and VOC emissions inventories 

Thank you for exploring this matter proactively. We do find the attached emissions-related information for ammonia 

and organics to be representative for Indiana, the Central Indiana Region, as well as Indiana’s portion of the Louisville 

Area. As such, we request that it be considered a technical addendum to Indiana’s Request for Redesignation and 

Maintenance Plan for the Annual Fine Particle Standard for Central Indiana and Indiana’s potion of the Louisville Area. 

Although IDEM references 2008 as the base year for both the referenced submittals, the 2007 emissions data for 

ammonia and organics is deemed to be representative for 2008 as well. 

Please feel free to contact me if you need further clarification. Thanks. 

From: D'Agostino, Kathleen [mailto:dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 12:33 PM 

To: DELONEY, SCOTT; sagoff, kendra; Aburano, Douglas 

Subject: ammonia and VOC emissions inventories 

As we discussed, LADCO has Excel files on its web page that contain county level VOC and ammonia emissions 

inventories for 2007. I have attached the complete file as well as a file with only information for the Indianapolis 

counties. I would suggest looking over the Indianapolis specific file to ensure that it contains the appropriate data. I 

have also attached links for the inventory page (http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/current/index.php), the county 

specific file (http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/basecv8/annual/winsum__allstates.cy.2007.csv) and the inventory 

documentation (http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/basecv8/Base_C_Emissions_Documentation_Sept_12.pdf).
#### Edward DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Edward Dixon, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Edward Dixon appealed his judgment and sentence entered on the conviction of second degree murder in 1971. The judgment and sentence were affirmed in Case No. 71-555. Subsequently, petitioner filed two Rule 3.850 motions in the trial court, both of which were denied. He now timely appeals only the denial of the second Rule 3.850 motion.

The Rule 3.850 motion which is the subject of this appeal basically alleges three grounds. Two of the grounds were also raised in the first Rule 3.850 motion, which was denied as aforesaid and appealed (which appeal was voluntarily dismissed). Those two points are now res judicata.

The third and only raisable point (not being raised in either the direct appeal or prior Rule 3.850 motion) concerns the introduction of various inculpatory statements made by appellant, allegedly taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona.1

In any case, going to the merits of the point, the transcript of the trial, on file here in the original appeal wallet, contradicts appellant’s allegation. Several officers testified as to the warnings given appellant and a “rights card” initialed by appellant was introduced into evidence at trial. There was testimony that the card was read to appellant. The warnings on the card were more than sufficient to comply with *Miranda, supra.*

There being abundant evidence in the files and record of the case on which the *251trial judge could summarily deny appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion, as he did, appellant stands in no better posture here. Accordingly, further proceedings in this appeal are hereby dispensed with and the order of the trial court should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

1

. (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.