alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.k  AMENDMENT
TO THE CHANGE
IN CONTROL, SEVERANCE
AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR
JAMES MAYO  This Amendment to
the Change in Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for James Mayo (the
Amendment), is made this 17th day of September, 2003, between Hudson United
Bancorp and Hudson United Bank (collectively, the Company), a New Jersey
corporation which maintains its principal office at 1000 MacArthur Boulevard,
Mahwah, New Jersey, and James Mayo (the Executive), and amends the Change in
Control, Severance and Employment Agreement for James Mayo, which was made
effective as of January 30, 2002 (the Agreement).  WHEREAS, the
Executive is presently an executive officer of the Company;  and  WHEREAS, the
Executive and the Company wish to amend the Agreement to clarify certain
provisions therein, and to provide a greater period of protection for the
Executive under the terms of the Agreement;  NOW, THEREFORE,
for the good and valuable consideration set forth herein and the Executives
continued employment with the Company, the Company and the Executive, each
intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:  1.Paragraph
1(c) of the Agreement, relating to the term Contract Period, is amended by
deleting the words one year from subparagraph (i) thereof, and replacing them
with the words three years.  2.Paragraph
9(c) of the Agreement, relating to Payments and Benefits, is amended by
deleting the first sentence thereof, and replacing it with the following:  If the Company
terminates the Executives employment during the Contract Period without Cause
or if the Executive resigns for Good Reason under paragraph 9(b), the Company
shall, as promptly as practical but in no event later than 10 business days
after the termination of employment pay the Executive a lump sum (the Lump
Sum) equal to 2.0 times the sum of (i)  
   the annual salary
of the Executive immediately prior to the Change in Control, and (ii) the
highest bonus paid to the Executive during the three fiscal years prior to the Change
in Control.  For purposes of the
calculation of the bonus amount component of the Lump Sum only, Paragraph
1(b)(ii)(B), regarding the Time of the Change of Control, will be disregarded.  3.The
Company agrees that it will not treat (for tax reporting purposes or for
calculation purposes under Section 10 of the Agreement) any benefits under the
Hudson United Bancorp Supplemental Employees Retirement Plan (the SERP) as
parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent
that such benefits were vested and accrued prior to the occurrence of such
change of control, as the SERP was not adopted in contemplation of a change of
control.  IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized representatives
pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors Compensation Committee,
and the Executive has personally executed this Agreement, all as of the day and
year first above written.  ATTEST:
  HUDSON UNITED BANCORP
  ANDHUDSON UNITED BANKBy:
  /s/ Charles F.X. PoggiCharles F. X. PoggiChairman, Compensation CommitteeWITNESS:
  EXECUTIVE/s/James MayoJames Mayo
# C_2005193EN.01003401.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/34

---

Action brought on 23 May 2003 by Giorgio Lebedef and Others against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-204/05)

(2005/C 193/57)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 23 May 2005 by Giorgio Lebedef, residing in Luxembourg, Armand Imbert, residing in Brussels, Jean-Marie Rousseau, residing in Brussels, and Maria Rosario Domenech Cobo, residing in Brussels, represented by G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the express rejection, of 12 July 2004, of application D/393/04 by which the applicants requested that the operating system and all the software used to operate their personal computers be made available, by the competent service, in their mother tongue, or alternatively, in another official language of the European Union of their choice; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the express rejection, of 12 July 2004, of application D/393/04 by which the applicants requested that the operating system and all the software used to operate their personal computers be made available, by the competent service, in their mother tongue, or alternatively, in another official language of the European Union of their choice;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, all officials of the Commission, applied to their superiors for the operating system and all the software used to operate their personal computers to be made available in their mother tongue or, alternatively, in another official language of the European Union of their choice. That application and their complaints having been rejected, the applicants brought this action. They claim that the practice of installing the entire configuration of the computers in English, although the software used is available in several languages, infringes the principle of non-discrimination, because the complete mastery of the computer necessitates a knowledge, no less complete, of the English language, superior to the level which can reasonably be expected of a European official who is not anglophone by birth.

The applicants also rely on alleged infringements of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials, of the prohibition of arbitrary procedures and of the duty to state reasons, as well as an alleged misuse of powers.

---
1 ... S eeT EX. R . A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 21 8- CV GAL E L E ON F OR D AP P E L L ANT V . BI LL I E JOA N FO RD A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 1 58TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### M E M OR ANDUM OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- O n A ugu st11 , 20 08 , w e not i f i ed appel la nt t hat hi s br i efhad not been fi l e d a s re q u i re d b y T e x a s R u l e o f A p p e l l a te P ro c e d u re 3 8 .6 (a ). T EX. R . A PP . P. 38 . 6( a) . W e st at ed w e coul d di sm i ss t he appeal f orw ant ofpr osecut i on un l ess a p p e lla n to ra n y p a r t y d e s ir in g t o c o n t in u e t h is a p p e a l f ile d w it h t h e c o u r tw it h in t en day s a r es pons e s how i ng gr ounds f orco nt i nui ng t he app ea l . W e hav e n ot r ecei ved any r esponse.2

Beca us e a ppe l l a n t’ s br i efha s notbe en f i l ed, w e d i sm i ss t he app ea l f or w a n t o f p ro s e c u ti o n . S eeT EX . R . A PP . P . 3 8 .8 (a ), 4 2 .3 (b ). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l etexecut i on i ssue.
P E R CU R I AM
P A N E L : L IV IN G S T O N , D A U P H IN O T , a n d H O L M A N , J J . DEL I VERE D: Aug us t29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6235
In Re: ANTHONY MUNGAL, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-96-488-DKC; CA-01-1240-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 2005 Decided: May 19, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Mungal, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Mungal filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court ruled on the motion by order entered on March 29, 2005. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant Mungal’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
HomeIceland

# Iceland

98 items

        -    TIAS  		Iceland (14-224) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime	  February 24, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (10-1006) – Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation in Geothermal Research and Development	  October 6, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (09-211) – Transportation Agreement for the Promotion of Aviation Safety	  February 11, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (08-1215) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 15, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (06-929) – Agreement Regarding the Withdrawal of US Forces from and the Return to Iceland of Certain Agreed Areas and Facilities in Iceland	  September 29, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (02-301.1) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement of June 14, 1995	  March 1, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (13117) – Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Science and Engineering Research	  September 30, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Iceland (99-708) – Agreement Amending and Extending the Memorandum of Understanding of January 28 and April 9, 1982 for Scientific and Technological Cooperation in Earth Sciences, as Amended and Extended	  July 8, 1999 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
Memorandum

DATE: February 2, 2015

TO: Department of Energy ( expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov)

FROM: Chip Yost

CC: John Cymbalsky

SUBJECT: Ex Parte Communications, Docket EERE–2014–BT–TP–0014 / RIN 1904–AD22

On January 23, 2015, representatives from the commercial portable air conditioner and spot 

cooler industry and the National Association of Manufacturers participated in a conference call 

with the Department of Energy’s Office of Building Technologies Program regarding the Notice 

of Data Availability for Portable Air Conditioners, Docket No. EERE-2014-BT-TP-0014, RIN 

1904-AD22. 

In summary, we discussed the difference between commercial portable air conditioning units 

and residential portable air conditioning units. 

The participants were as follows:

John Cymbalsky- Office of Building Technologies Program

Troy Watson- Navigant (DOE)

Len Swatkowski- OceanAire Inc.

Marlin Spencer- AirPac Inc.

Ed LoCasio- Temp-Air Inc.

Chip Yost- National Association of Manufacturers

Jack Gerard- National Association of Manufacturers
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, David Lieberman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company do each
hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: November 20, 2006


By: /S/ David Lieberman
-----------------------
David Lieberman
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 588.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
40697.

#### PICKENS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted under three seperate indictments for burglary. The cases were tried together and separate verdicts of guilty were rendered. Thereafter, in a single motion for new trial, the defendant sought a new trial on each indictment, and he now seeks in a single *748bill of exceptions to have such convictions set aside. *Held:*

Decided May 6, 1964

Rehearing denied May 21, 1964.

*Johnson & Johnson, Jean E. Johnson, Sr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*George D. Lawrence, Solicitor General,*contra.

Under the decisions of this court in *Roberts v. State,*103 Ga. App. 355 (120 SE2d 164); *Dempsey v. State,*103 Ga. App. 354 (119 SE2d 298), and *Fair v. State,*109 Ga. App. ante, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Russell, J., concurs. Hall, J., concurs specially.*

Hald, Judge,

concurring specially. I concur specially for the reasons stated in *Fair v. State,*ante.
www.gpo.gov

### §571. Declaration of policy

It is hereby recognized that the presence of large volumes of water in anthracite coal formations involves serious wastage of the fuel resources of the Nation, and constitutes a menace to health and safety and national security. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the Congress to provide for the control and drainage of water in the anthracite coal formations and thereby conserve natural resources, promote national security, prevent injuries and loss of life, and preserve public and private property, and to seal abandoned coal mines and to fill voids in abandoned coal mines, in those instances where such work is in the interest of the public health or safety.

(July 15, 1955, ch. 369, §1, 69 Stat. 352; Pub. L. 87–818, §1(1), Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 934.)

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–818 declared it to be the policy of the Congress “to seal abandoned coal mines and to fill voids in abandoned coal mines, in those instances where such work is in the interest of the public health or safety”.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 572 of this title.
#### § 560.409 [Reserved]
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2980

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 1996

Received

MAY 9, 1996

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

stalking.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2980 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Stalking

3 Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. PUNISHMENT OF INTERSTATE STALKING.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after section 2261 the following:

7 ‘‘§ 2261A. Interstate stalking

8 ‘‘Whoever travels across a State line or within the

9 special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United

10 States with the intent to injure or harass another person,

11 and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel places

12 that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious

13 bodily injury (as defined in section 1365(g)(3) of this title)

14 to, that person or a member of that person’s immediate

15 family (as defined in section 115 of this title) shall be pun16 ished as provided in section 2261 of this title.’’.

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

18 (1) Section 2261(b) of title 18, United States

19 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or section 2261A’’

20 after ‘‘this section’’.

21 (2) Sections 2261(b) and 2262(b) of title 18,

22 United States Code, are each amended by striking

23 ‘‘offender’s spouse or intimate partner’’ each place it

24 appears and inserting ‘‘victim’’.
3

HR 2980 RFS

1 (3) The chapter heading for chapter 110A of

2 title 18, United States Code, is amended by insert3 ing ‘‘AND STALKING’’ after ‘‘VIOLENCE’’.

4 (4) The table of chapters at the beginning of

5 part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended

6 by striking

‘‘110A. Domestic violence ......................................................... 2261’’

7 and inserting:

‘‘110A. Domestic violence and stalking ............................... 2261’’.

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

9 at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States

10 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

11 section 2261 the following new item:

‘‘2261A. Interstate stalking.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25.795-6**Date:**10/24/2008** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Least Risk Bomb Location** ****Related Regulation(s):**Unknown Part**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**ANM-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
# Greece

169 items

        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Greece	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Joint Statement  		COVID-19 and Religious Minorities Pandemic Statement	  August 20, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Greece	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Greece	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Greece	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Greece	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Greece	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Greece (20-213) – Amendment of Agreement of July 8, 1990, as Extended	  February 13, 2020 
        -    		Economic Dialogues	   
        -    TIAS  		Greece (19-1105) – Amendment to the July 17, 2011 Agreement Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions	  November 5, 2019 

previous page1…1112131415…17next page

Back to Top
# Burundi

51 items

        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Burundi	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Burundi	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Burundi	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  May 29, 2018 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2872 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2872

  To authorize substitution for drawback purposes of certain types of 
    fibers and yarns for use in the manufacture of carpets and rugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 1996

 Mr. Deal of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize substitution for drawback purposes of certain types of 
    fibers and yarns for use in the manufacture of carpets and rugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRAWBACK FOR CERTAIN YARNS AND FIBERS.

    Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(x) Carpet and Rug Products.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, when used or usable in the manufacture of products classified 
in heading 5703 of the Schedule B Classification of Exports, imported 
duty-paid merchandise is of the same kind and quality as the duty-paid, 
duty-free, or domestic merchandise which is substituted in the exported 
product if--
            ``(1) the imported duty-paid merchandise is classified 
        under heading 5402, 5404, or 5406 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States and the material with which it is 
        substituted would also be classified under the same headings, 
        or
            ``(2) the imported duty-paid merchandise is classified 
        under heading 5501, 5503, 5505, 5506, or 5509 of the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States and the material with 
        which it is substituted would also be classified under the same 
        headings.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to--
            (1) any drawback claim made on or after the 30th day after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) any drawback entry that, as of the 30th day after such 
        date of enactment, is unliquidated or the liquidation of which 
        is not final or is under protest.
                                 <all>
```
HomeMozambique

# Mozambique

94 items

        -    Press Statement  		The Spirit of Partnership:  Implementing the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 1, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Mozambique	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 4, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		The Department of State Celebrates the Dedication of the New U.S. Embassy in Maputo	  September 30, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Designations of ISIS-Mozambique, JNIM, and al-Shabaab Leaders	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 6, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 30, 2021	  Jalina PorterJuly 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Mozambique	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Mozambican President Nyusi	  July 14, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mozambique	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Mozambique National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 25, 2021 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top