alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Mexico

485 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Events at the Embassy of Mexico in Ecuador	  Matthew MillerApril 6, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		New Partnership with Mexico to Explore Semiconductor Supply Chain Opportunities	  March 28, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 25, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 25, 2024Washington, D.C.  
        -    Fact Sheet  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas High-level Meeting Outcomes for 2024	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Department of Justice Release  		Liberty County woman sentenced for passport-related federal violations	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Monterrey, Mexico: American School Foundation of Monterrey: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Mexico City, Mexico: The American School Foundation: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Guadalajara, Mexico: The American School Foundation of Guadalajara, A.C.: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 

123…49next page

Back to Top
#### § 597.514 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78481, Dec. 21, 2022]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 13, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 13, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A2093. JOHNATHAN MORINE v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-1-2009

USA v. Sandra Buckeridge

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-2744

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Sandra Buckeridge" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1256.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1256
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 08-2744

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Appellee

v.

SANDRA YVONNE BUCKERIDGE

a/k/a

Natasha Massicot

 Sandra Yvonne Buckeridge,

 Appellant

____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of the Virgin Islands

(D.C. No. 07-cr-00017)

District Judge: Honorable Curtis V. Gomez

____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 21, 2009

Before: BARRY, HARDIMAN and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: June 01, 2009)

____________

OPINION OF THE COURT

____________
2

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

Sandra Buckeridge appeals her conviction for aggravated identity theft in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) (Count IV). Buckeridge argues that § 1028A(a)(1) requires

that the Government prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she knew the documents she

used in committing her underlying felony belonged to an actual person. This issue, which

was the subject of a difference of opinion among the United States Courts of Appeals,

was resolved by the Supreme Court in Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1886

(2009). In Flores-Figueroa, the Court held that the Government must show that the

defendant knew that the means of identification he used belonged to another person in

order to prove aggravated identity theft. Id. at 1888. Because the Government made no

effort to prove that Buckeridge had such knowledge, it has rightly conceded in its

supplemental brief that Buckeridge’s conviction for aggravated identity theft must be

vacated. Accordingly, we will vacate Buckeridge’s conviction on Count IV and remand

for resentencing.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 341.5 Limitation on holdings.

The limit on the amount of any Retirement Plan Bonds issued during 1974, or in any one calendar year thereafter, that may be purchased in the name of any one person as registered owner is $10,000 (face value).

[39 FR 36114, Oct. 8, 1974]
#### § 584.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...COP28 Women Climate Entrepreneurs Pitch Competition

# 									COP28 Women Climate Entrepreneurs Pitch Competition							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 8, 2023

On December 8, the Coalition for Climate Entrepreneurship (CCE) held its second pitch competition for women climate entrepreneurs during the UN Climate Change Conference (COP28).  The Department of State’s Office of Global Partnerships Managing Director Thomas Debass hosted the event, which featured keynote speeches from USAID Deputy Assistant Administrator for the Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Hub Bama Athreya and State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Acting Assistant Secretary Jennifer R. Littlejohn.  Judges from Google, Amazon, General Electric and LinkedIn evaluated pitches by four women entrepreneurs leading early-stage, climate solutions-focused start-ups, who competed for $100,000 to scale their ventures.  All four competitors will receive technical training through Google’s Startups Cloud Program and entrepreneurial support through the CCE program.  The top prize was awarded to Dana Shukirbayeva, Founder and CEO of Forest Hero—a start-up based in Central Asia that provides a “smart” platform to combat deforestation and reduce the carbon footprint*.*

The participants included:
        - Rana Hajirasouli, The Surpluss – Information Technology, U.S.A.
        - Sabrine Chennaoui, MENSAPO – Consumer Goods, Tunisia
        - Dana Shukirbayeva, Forest Hero – Climate Data and Analytics, Kazakhstan
        - Devleena Bhattacharjee, ClimaCrew – Climate Data and Analytics, India

CCE is a partnership that aims to further economic empowerment in developing countries by nurturing entrepreneurial climate solutions.  To learn more about the State Department’s partnerships in climate, read the 2023 State of Global Partnerships report released this week at COP28 at https://www.state.gov/reports-office-of-global-partnerships/.  Follow @GPatState on LinkedIn, X, Facebook and YouTube for more updates from COP28.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate and EnvironmentClimate ChangeCOP28Economic AffairsEntrepreneurshipOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsOffice of Global PartnershipsWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
#### § 700.4 Preservation of property.

It shall be unlawful for any person without proper authority to willfully destroy, damage, deface, or remove property (including Federal records) or any part thereof or any furnishing therein.
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2019...Chapter 14: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019

# 									Chapter 14: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019							

2019 Digest: Chapter 14: [926 KB]
        - U.S.-Albania Fulbright MOU [262 KB]
        - U.S.-Qatar documents
        - U.S.-Qatar Cultural Statement of Intent [102 KB]
        - U.S.-Qatar Education MOU [133 KB]
        - U.S.-Estonia Fulbright MOU Amendment [112 KB]
        - U.S. brief on appeal in ASSE Int’l v. Pompeo [313 KB]

 

Tags

International LawLegal Adviser

Back to Top
#### Valerie C. Kemeny, complainant, *v.*William F. Wentz et al., defendants.

[Decided October 31st, 1929.]

*Mr. Robert D.*Grosman, for the motion.

*Mr. George T. Viclcers, contra.*

Backes, V. C.

The complainant, a judgment creditor, filed his bill for a statutory discovery in aid of execution of his judgment at law. An order was made that the judgment debtor make discovery before a master. The bill also specifically charges assets of the debtor in the hands of his wife, who, by her answer, claims it as her own.

The motion to strike the wife’s answer as sham is based upon testimony taken before the master. The testimony is not of that satisfactory character to warrant denying the wife a hearing. The motion is denied.

The motion to strike the counter-claim of the debtor, in which he assails the judgment at law, is allowed. The facts *297alleged do not disclose any equities justifying interference by this court with the enforcement of the judgment.

The motion to compel the judgment debtor to give a fuller answer must be denied. Complainants ordinarily have the right to a full discovery by answer, but the statute under which the complainant seeks relief provides a substitute. And so is the practice, that the debtor make oral discovery before a master, and upon disclosure of property belonging to the debtor, under his control, the court may order him to pay it over to a receiver. As to property claimed to be of the debtor but in the hands of another who lays claim to it in his own right, ownership must be tried on final hearing before delivery to a receiver may be ordered. The court, however, may, in a proper case, order the property delivered to a receiver *pendente lite. New Jersey Lumber Co.*v. *Ryan, 57 N. J. Eq. 330.*
HomeEritrea

# Eritrea

61 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with U.S. Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa, Mike Hammer	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Hammer’s Work in Ethiopia	  September 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Eritrea	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Eritrea	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Outcomes of the 50th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  July 12, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Eritrea	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Occasion of the State of Eritrea’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 24, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 29, 2022	  Jalina PorterApril 29, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Eritrea	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Eritrea	  December 16, 2021 

previous page12345…7next page

Back to Top
PUBLIC LAW 106–444—NOV. 6, 2000 114 STAT. 1929

Public Law 106–444

106th Congress

An Act

To amend title 44, United States Code, to ensure preservation of the records

of the Freedmen’s Bureau.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedmen’s Bureau Records

Preservation Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF FREEDMEN’S BUREAU RECORDS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 29 of title 44, United States Code,

is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘§ 2910. Preservation of Freedmen’s Bureau records

‘‘The Archivist shall preserve the records of the Bureau of

Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, commonly referred

to as the ‘Freedmen’s Bureau’, by using—

‘‘(1) microfilm technology for preservation of the documents

comprising these records so that they can be maintained for

future generations; and

‘‘(2) the results of the pilot project with the University

of Florida to create future partnerships with Howard University

and other institutions for the purposes of indexing these records

and making them more easily accessible to the public, including

historians, genealogists, and students, and for any other purposes determined by the Archivist.’’.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 29 of title 44, United States Code, is amended

by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘2910. Preservation of Freedmen’s Bureau records.’’.

44 USC 101 note.

Freedmen’s

Bureau Records

Preservation Act

of 2000.

Nov. 6, 2000

[H.R. 5157]

114 STAT. 1930 PUBLIC LAW 106–444—NOV. 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5157:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 19, considered and passed House.

Oct. 26, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section

2910 of title 44, United States Code (as added by section 2), a

total of $3,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

Approved November 6, 2000.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 27, 2009 

0324 

Order 

 

March 27, 2009 

Rehearing Nos. 554 & 556 

133466, 133468 

UNITED STATES FIDELITY INSURANCE & 

GUARANTY COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133466 

 COA: 260604 

Oakland CC: 2003-051485-CK 

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS 

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

MICHAEL MIGDAL, Individually and as 

Conservator for the Estate of DANIEL MIGDAL, 

a Protected Person, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE 

MIDWEST, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133468 

 COA: 271199 

Oakland CC: 2006-071933-CK 

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS 

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

In this case, motions for rehearing of this Court’s December 29, 2008 opinion are 

considered and, on order of the Court, they are GRANTED. The case is hereby 

resubmitted for decision without further briefing or oral argument. 

 CORRIGAN and YOUNG, JJ., would deny rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 3 (i)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                               BY SHAREHOLDERS TO
                                   ARTICLES OF
                                BELMONT BANCORP.
                              Charter Number 599182

Wilbur R. Roat, who is the President of the above named Ohio corporation
organized for profit, does hereby certify that a meeting of the shareholders was
duly called and held on May 20, 2002, at which meeting a quorum of the
shareholders was present in person or by proxy, and that by the affirmative vote
of the holders of shares entitling them to exercise 80.2% of the voting power of
the corporation, the following resolution to amend the articles was adopted:

RESOLVED, that Article Thirteenth, Subparagraph (1), of the Articles of
Incorporation be amended as follows:

Section 1: The property, business, and affairs of the Corporation shall be
managed and controlled by the Board of Directors. The number of directors of the
Corporation (exclusive of directors to be elected by the holders of one of more
series of Preferred Stock voting separately as a class or classes) shall not be
less than seven (7) nor more than fifteen (15), the exact number of directors to
be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by affirmative vote of a
majority of the whole Board of Directors. As used in this Article, the term
"whole Board" means the total number of directors which the Corporation would
have if there were no vacancies.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above named officer, acting for and on behalf of the
corporation, has hereunto subscribed his name on June 4, 2002.

                                                           /s/ Wilbur R. Roat
                                                           By:  Wilbur R. Roat
                                                           President
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Linda J. Miles, certify that:1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”);2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and;5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.*/s/*LINDA J. MILESLinda J. Miles
Exhibit 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the  undersigned  hereby  certifies  in his  capacity  as an  officer of
InMedica Development  Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10QSB for the period  ended March 31, 2004 fully  complies  with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information  contained in such report fairly presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial condition of the Company at the end of such periods and
the results of operations of the Company for such periods.


/s/ Ralph Henson
 Ralph Henson, Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Richard Bruggeman
Richard Bruggeman, Chief Financial Officer
PACING OCEAN
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP THE RAMPART

THE RAMPART
NOS NH 11-4

TRAIN AMEN MRO CCR
Seve 290-000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group; Subcommittee J—Population and Patient-Oriented Training.                    

*Date:*                         October 28, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ilda M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481,                         *mckennai@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 21, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20782 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P