alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. §1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert K. Bench, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: November 18, 2010                                                                                 /s/  Robert K. Bench


Robert K. Bench


Chief Executive Officer






This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeFinland

# Finland

170 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Finnish Foreign Minister Haavisto	  May 19, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Finland	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Finland	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Finland	  December 3, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Finland	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Finland	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Finland	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Finland	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Finland	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (19-1003) – Agreement Concerning Reciprocal Defense Procurement	  October 3, 2019 

previous page1…121314151617next page

Back to Top
#### Atlantic-Brigantine Hotel and Pier Company, appellant, *v.*Island Development Company et al., respondents.

[Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Messrs. Repeito &*Godfrey, for the appellant.

*Messrs. Bourgeois &*Coulomb, for the respondents.

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in *104 N. J. Eq. 262.*

*For affirmance*— The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Guy Hughes FAIRFAX, Sr., and Willa Jean Fairfax, Appellants, v. MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 78-2369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 9, 1979.

Donald E. McLawhorn, Tampa, for appellants.

David E. Stone, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Florida Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Company,*160 So.2d 733, 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).
#### John COLIGAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 00-3115.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2001.

*872Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Ex Parte Tommy Frank HARE. (Re: Tommy Frank Hare v. State of Alabama).

80-31.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #39 October 7 - 13, 2009 

An overall above average wet season for Afghanistan gave 

way to more seasonal dry weather during the summer. During 

the winter months a deep snow pack developed across the 

central highlands and northeast mountains. As temperatures 

began to warm during the spring months, as is typical, the 

snow began to melt. The snow melt combined with rainfall 

triggered localized flooding. 

Snow pack now remains confined to the highest elevations of 

the northeast, as is typical for September. 

After unseasonal wetness earlier in September, seasonal dry 

weather returned during the past few weeks. Dry weather can 

be expected to continue into the beginning of October. 

Temperatures have averaged below-normal during the first ten 

days of September but averaged above-normal during the rest 

of September (Figure 2). Temperatures, however continue to 

drop, and will likely slip below zero degrees during the next 

week across the central highlands (Figure 3) over night during 

the next week. High temperatures also continue to drop. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Temperature Anomaly (°C) for September 1 -10, 

2009 

Source: USGS

Figure 3. Extreme Minimum Temperature (°C) for

October 5- 12 , 2009

Source: NOAA/CPC
# Canada

368 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 5, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces Key Measures to Jump Start Deployments of Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems and to Secure Nuclear Fuel Supply Chains, Accelerating the Contribution of Nuclear Energy to Net Zero Goals	  December 5, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Canada	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the U.S. and Canada IRFBA Ministerial Side Event on Cultural Erasure	  Uzra ZeyaNovember 29, 2023IRFBA Ministerial Side Event on Cultural ErasurePrague, Czech Republic 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Canadian Foreign Minister Joly	  November 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Norfolk and Newport News, Virginia and Halifax, Canada, November 15-19, 2023	  November 14, 2023 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 10, 2023Leela PalaceNew Delhi, India 
        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Keynote Address at the Building Momentum Towards Net Zero Conference	  Geoffrey R. PyattNovember 9, 2023Canadian Climate InstituteCanada 

previous page123456…37next page

Back to Top
#### AMERICAN REALTY CO., a partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Edward S. GWIN and Jeanette A. Gwin, Appellees.

No. 79-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 22, 1979.

Thomas R. Tatum and Christine P. Tatum of Buck & Tatum, P. A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.

*644Welcom H. Watson, Jr., of Watson, Hubert & Davis, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant’s motion to quash service of process under the long arm statute, Section 48.193(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). Although there were some unsworn allegations in the complaint which might have supported the trial court’s ruling, the appellant filed a sworn affidavit factually controverting each of those allegations. The appellees did not respond to the affidavit filed by appellant. Under such circumstances, where one party has demonstrated by uncontradicted sworn proof that Florida courts have no jurisdiction, a motion to quash should be granted. *Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings and Loan Association of Fort Lauderdale,*325 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
#### Vincent A. CRUDELE and Sylvia Crudele, his wife, Appellants, v. Melvin KOENIG and Pearl Koenig, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Mary D. NICHOLSON, as mother and next friend of Douglas Dean Destin, a minor, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. V-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 1974.

*105Hugh T. Handley, of Handley, Tongue & Touchstone, Fort Walton Beach, for appellants.

Walter J. Smith, of Smith, Grimsley, Barron & Remington, Fort Walton Beach, for appellees.

McCORD, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal from'an order entered in a suit for assault and battery and false imprisonment. The order complained of denied appellant the right to introduce evidence at trial as to prior alleged acts of similar misconduct by Grover C. Ayers. There was no proffer of the proposed evidence prior to or after the court’s ruling.

Although no motion to dismiss this appeal has been filed, the interlocutory order from which appeal is sought, is not allowed by Rule 4.2(a) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., and, therefore, will be dismissed on our own motion. Appellant should proffer the proposed evidence in the trial court outside of the jury’s presence for the trial court’s determination as to whether or not it is admissible and to complete and preserve the record in the cause. See Green v. Hood, Fla.App., 120 So.2d 223; Musachia v. Terry, Fla.App., 140 So.2d 605.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
#### Mary V. HOLLOWAY, Appellant, v. Richard Ray HOLLOWAY, Appellee.

Nos. 80-525, 80-1022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1981.

*1194Joseph A. McGowan, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered on rehearing is affirmed except insofar as it eliminates the award of permanent periodic alimony contained in the original final judgment. Under the circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to deny permanent alimony to the appellant-wife. *Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); *Colucci v. Colucci,*392 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *G’Sell v. G’Sell,*390 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Since it appears that the $163.00 per month initially granted represents and was considered by the trial court to be a fair and adequate amount, we order that, after remand, this provision be inserted in the amended final judgment under review.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.1

1

. The attorney’s fee award on appeal in case no. 80-1022 is affirmed.
# Guatemala

178 items

        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez to Lead U.S. Delegation at U.S.-Guatemala High Level Economic Dialogue	  March 15, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas High-level Meeting Outcomes for 2024	  March 12, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Guatemala City, Guatemala: Colegio Maya: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Charting a New Path for Hemispheric Migration Partnership at Trilateral Ministerial Meeting	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior Administration Officials Previewing the U.S.-Mexico-Guatemala Trilateral Ministerial Meeting on Migration	  February 28, 2024Via Teleconference 
        -    Media Note  		Trilateral Migration Ministerial with Guatemala, Mexico, and the United States	  February 27, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Mexican Foreign Secretary Alicia Bárcena before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 19, 2024Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 18, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Alejandro Eduardo Giammattei Falla for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Matthew MillerJanuary 17, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 17, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 17, 2024Washington, D.C. 

previous page1234…18next page

Back to Top
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. 33191.

Decided December 3, 1917.]

*On Remand.*

*Proofs, what necessary*— Money judgments against the United States will not be entered on estimated amounts of damages. (See *Maryland Casualty Co.*v. *United States,*52 C. Cls., 201; Id., 288.)

*82*The Reporter's*statement of the case:

*Mr. A. R. Serven*for the plaintiff. *Serven <& Joyce*were on the briefs.

*Mr. George M.*Anderson, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Huston*Thompson, for the defendants.

Per Curiam :

The court announced its opinion in this case on February 12, 1917. The order then made remanded the case to the general docket for a restatement of amounts due under the agreed findings of fact so that a correct judgment might be awarded. A wide difference of opinion developed between the contending parties and in order to simplify the issue the court on April 2, 1917, announced its second opinion, again remanding the case to the general docket for specific proof in accord with what we deemed a perfectly plain and specific order. Ample time was allowed to comply with the order and the parties fully protected in every respect. The order of April 2, 1917, has not been complied with. The court can not and will not enter money judgments against the United States in a case like this upon estimates. The figures were available and exactness possible. The claimant company having been given ample opportunity to furnish this testimony, and having failed to do so, the court can do no less than dismiss its petition. The petition is dismissed. It it so ordered.
No. 16,829.

#### Suin et al. *v.*Deschamp et al.

*Practice.*— Action *for Belief from Decree in Partition.*— Demurrer, *Effect of.*— Bight *to Controvert the Facts Alleged.*— If a demurrer to a complaint seeking relief from a decree in partition be overruled, the effect of the demurrer in such case is that it admits the truth of the complaint only for the purpose of testing its sufficiency; and the defendant may thereafter controvert the truth of the facts alleged in the complaint.

From the Howard Circuit Court.

*J. F. Morrison, J. E. Holman, J. Cantwell*and *8. W. Cantwell,*for appellants.

*D. A. Woods, J. T. Elliott*and *W. C. Overton,*for appellees.

Hackney, C. J.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, sought to be relieved from a decree in partition, rendered by the lower court in a suit by the appellees. Their complaint was under section 396, R. S. 1881; section 399, R. S. 1894.

The court overruled appellees’ demurrer to the complaint and granted them additional time in which to file counter affidavits, to. the granting of which time the appellants excepted. Thereafter, and without objection or exception, counter affidavits were filed by the appellees; and rebuttal affidavits, by the appellants. Upon the affidavits so filed the court found for the appellees.

It is first urged by the appellants, that the appellees were precluded by the demurrer and the court’s ruling thereon, and that it was error to admit counter affidavits and a further hearing.

The cases of *Nord*v. *Marty,*56 Ind. 531, and *Clandy*v. *Caldwell, Admr.,*106 Ind. 256, are cited as supporting this view.

*503Filed Sept. 28, 1894.

In each of these cases the demurrer was sustained, and ‘this court held that the demurrer admitted the facts pleaded and presented their sufficiency as upon an agreed statement of facts. The question suggested in the case before us was not in review in either of the cases cited, but the exact question has been repeatedly ruled against the appellants’ view. *Lawler*v. *Couch,*80 Ind. 369; *Nash*v. *Cars,*92 Ind. 216; *Parker*v. *Indianapolis Nat'l Bank,*1 Ind. App. 462.

We are asked to consider the evidence, and having found that there is stubborn conflict upon material questions, we decline to weigh and determine the preponderance. *Nash*v. *Cars, supra; Wells*v. *Bradley, etc.,*3 Ind. App. 278.

In addition to the facts already suggested, as to the absence of exceptions to the introduction of affidavits, the affidavits in the transcript are not brought into the record by bill of exceptions, but of these questions we make no decision.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
#### Willie Mae SMITH, Appellant, v. Errol J. POTTER, Appellee.

No. 80-1039.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Dec. 2, 1981.

Michael A. Campbell of Greater Orlando Area Legal Services, Inc., Orlando, for appellant.

Ronald S. Webster of Whittaker, Pyle, Stump & Webster, P. A., Orlando, for ap-pellee.

COWART, Judge.

Appellant filed a complaint in equity alleging that she had executed. a deed to appellee without adequate consideration and without intent to transfer an indefeasible legal title and praying that the deed be cancelled. The defendant filed an answer and counterclaim and moved for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint apparently on the basis that it did not state a cause of action. The complaint is poorly drawn; however, a liberal reading of it indicates that at one time appellant owned a home subject to two mortgages, that the two mortgages had been foreclosed and the *1232foreclosure sale date set when appellee contacted appellant and “offered to help her save her property from the foreclosure sale” pursuant to which, to avert the foreclosure sale, appellee paid all sums due the two mortgagees and appellant executed to ap-pellee the deed in question.

Under these allegations of the complaint, the deed could be deemed a mortgage under section 697.01(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Equity peculiarly has jurisdiction to declare an instrument in the form of a unqualified conveyance to be, in equity, a mortgage merely securing a debt and to recognize the equity of redemption that remains in the grantor of such a deed. Since under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) every complaint is considered to pray for general relief, it cannot be said that the complaint lacked such equity (or failed to state a cause of action) as to be subject to dismissal. Accordingly the judgment on the pleadings is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
# C_2005217EN.01006304.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/63

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-65/97 (1)

1

(2005/C 217/131)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-65/97, Th.H.P. Neelen v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997

1

---
# Dominica

48 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Dominican Republic	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Dominica	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Dominica	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Dominica’s Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 3, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Dominica	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Dominica	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken’s Roundtable with CARICOM Foreign Ministers	  April 21, 2021 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top