alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2767 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2767

                      To extend au pair programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 1995

  Mr. Gilman (for himself, Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
Davis, Mr. Baker of California, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Wolf) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To extend au pair programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AU PAIR PROGRAMS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 8 of the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Act of 
1990 (Public Law 101-454) is repealed.
    (b) Authority for Au Pair Programs.--The Director of the United 
States Information Agency is authorized to continue to administer an au 
pair program, operating on a world-wide basis, through fiscal year 
1997.
    (c) Report.--Not later than October 1, 1996, the Director of the 
United States Information Agency shall submit a report regarding the 
continued extension of au pair programs to the Committee on Foreign 
Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of 
the House of Representatives. This report shall specifically detail the 
compliance of all au pair organizations with regulations governing au 
pair programs as published on February 15, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
HomeIceland

# Iceland

99 items

        -    TIAS  		Iceland (22-331) – Agreement Amending and Extending Memorandum of Understanding for Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences, as Amended and Extended	  March 31, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Arctic Council Cooperation Following Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine	  March 3, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Icelandic Foreign Minister Gylfadottir	  January 13, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		United States – Iceland Economic Partnership Dialogue	  December 8, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Iceland	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Iceland	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		The Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean Enters into Force	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Iceland’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 16, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Intervention at Arctic Council Ministerial	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 20, 2021Harpa Concert Hall and Conference CenterReykjavik, Iceland 
        -    Media Note  		Release of the 2021 Arctic Council Joint Declaration and Strategic Plan in Reykjavik, Iceland	  May 20, 2021 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
B O BBY }lNDAL GOVERNOR



### Mr. Mark Hansen

## ~tate 

# of JLouisiana DEP ARTMENT OFENVIR O NMENTAL QUALITY 

### E

NVIRONMENT AL SERVICES
October 15, 2014 Acting Associate Director, Air Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Re: Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) Update Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) Dear Mr. Hansen: P E GGY M
. HA TCH SECRETA!{)

By letter dated November 9, 2007, the Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality (LDEQ) transmitted its "2006 General Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP)" to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6. 1 This submission requested that EPA approve amendments to LAC 33:III.504 (Nonattainment New Source Review Procedures) promulgated by LDEQ in September 2006 (AQ253). These amendments included provisions under LAC 33:Ill.504. M which established offset requirements for sources located in the parishes of Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West Baton Rouge that are more stringent than required by the Clean Air Act. By way ofthis correspondence, LDEQ requests that EPA take no action on LAC 33:III.504.M. It is LDEQ's desire that this subsection remain "state-only" and not be included in Louisiana's SIP. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Bryan D. Johnston of the Air Permits Division at (225) 2 19-3450. Sincerely,

# ~ Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary TBT:BDJ

1 EDMS Doc ID 3447500
Post Office Box 4313 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4313 • Phone 225-219-3181 • Fax 225-219-3309 www.deq.louisiana.gov
#### § 801.205 FIRRMA.

The term *FIRRMA* means the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018, Subtitle A of Title XVII of Public Law 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018).
#### R. P. YADAV v. Vera PROCELL.

No. 14319.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 2, 1981.

R. Gray Sexton, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Gerard E. Kiefer, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Before COVINGTON, CHIASSON and LEAR, JJ.

LEAR, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, R. P. Yadav, obtained judgment against defendant-appellant, Vera Procell, in the sum of $1,521.89. From this adverse judgment, defendant-appellant filed a motion for suspensive appeal. The Baton Rouge City Court judge fixed the bond at $2,500.00. Judgment was signed on October 10, 1980, and a “Motion for an Appeal” was signed on October 15, 1980, designating December 15, 1980, as the return date. In his motion, defendant-appellant sought and was granted a suspensive appeal. Appellant was required to post bond timely.1 The record reflects that the bond was not filed until January 15, 1981, more than thirty (30) days after the motion for appeal was granted. The bond comes too late. Appellant has not met the requirements of law and, therefore, his sus-pensive appeal must be and is dismissed at appellant’s cost. However, his devolutive appeal is maintained.

SUSPENSIVE APPEAL DISMISSED; DEVOLUTIVE APPEAL MAINTAINED.

1

. Art. 2123. Delay for taking suspensive appeal

> Except as otherwise provided by law, an appeal that suspends the effect or the execution of an appealable order or judgment may be taken, *and the security therefor furnished,*only within thirty days of:

> (1)The expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial, as provided by Article 1974, if no application has been filed timely;

> (2) The court’s refusal to grant a timely application for a new trial, if the applicant is not entitled to notice of such refusal under Article 1914; or

> (3) The date of the mailing of notice of the court’s refusal to grant a timely application for a new trial, if the applicant is entitled to such notice under Article 1914. (Emphasis ours.)
# C_2005229EN.01001503.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 13 July 2005

in Case T-5/04: Carlo Scano v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Internal competition - Multiple-choice questions - Refusal by the selection board not to take account of certain questions - Equal treatment - Principle of good administration - Ambit of judicial review - Action for annulment - Action for damages)

(2005/C 229/31)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-5/04: Carlo Scano, official of the Commission of the European Communities, resident in Brussels (Belgium), represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities, (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for first, annulment of the decision of the selection board in the internal competition COM/PA/02 for advancement from category B to category A establishing the results of the applicant in the pre-selection tests and refusing to admit him to the oral test of that competition, of the subsequent confirmatory decisions, of the list of successful candidates in that competition in the field in which the applicant was assessed and of any decision adopted on that basis, and second, damages — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1996 AND ITS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         498,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,525,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   415,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,617,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,632,000
<PP&E>                                       6,811,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,241,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,876,000
<BONDS>                                      4,780,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,850,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,241,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,399,000
<CGS>                                        7,536,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,292,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               361,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (377,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,254,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,254,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,254,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)


        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6549
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1789
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 14450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      30811
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            9304
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              9474
<LOANS>                                          74563
<ALLOWANCE>                                        716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  144802
<DEPOSITS>                                      103415
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2025
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1433
<LONG-TERM>                                      22672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4684
<OTHER-SE>                                       10573
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  144802
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3186
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   169
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9749
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3001
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4400
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5349
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      136
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 154
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3013
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1948
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .041
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2033
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   578
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       65
<RECOVERIES>                                        67
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  716
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               341
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            375
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 25, 2011

On June 16

th, 2011 we held a conference call with the Hybrid Manufacturers Regulatory

Collaboration (HMRC) to discuss concerns raised by members of the HMRC regarding heavyduty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Concerns were raised during the

comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavyduty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty OBD regulations that were 

published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.1,2 Specifically, they have requested a delay of the 

application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications until 2020. Attendees from the 

EPA and HMRC are shown below.

Attendee Affiliation

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Barbara Chance Allison Transmission

Kevin Rodgers Allison Transmission

Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation

Tom Apalenek BAE Systems

Derek Matthews BAE Systems

Jim Lyons Sierra Research

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
§ 800.213 Covered transaction. The term *covered transaction* means any of the following: ( a ) A covered control transaction;
( b ) A covered investment;
( c ) A change in the rights that a foreign person has with respect to a U.S. business in which the foreign person has an investment, if that change could result in a covered control transaction or a covered investment; or
( d ) Any other transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement, the structure of which is designed or intended to evade or circumvent the application of section 721.
( e ) Examples: ( 1 ) *Example 1.* Corporation A, a foreign person, acquires a 10 percent non-controlling equity interest in Corporation X, a U.S. business. Corporation X subsequently provides Corporation A the right to appoint the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Technical Officer of Corporation X. Corporation A does not acquire any additional equity interest in Corporation X. Assuming no other relevant facts, the change in rights is a covered transaction.
( 2 ) *Example 2.* Corporation A, a foreign person that is not an excepted investor, acquires a 10 percent non-controlling equity interest in Corporation X, an unaffiliated TID U.S. business, but Corporation A is not afforded any of the access, rights, or involvement specified in § 800.211(b) at the time of its investment. Corporation X later expands its board of directors and provides Corporation A with the right to appoint a director. Assuming no other relevant facts, the change in rights is a covered transaction.
( 3 ) *Example 3.* Corporation A is organized under the laws of a foreign state and is wholly owned and controlled by a foreign national. With a view towards circumventing section 721, Corporation A transfers money to a U.S. citizen, who, pursuant to informal arrangements with Corporation A and on its behalf, purchases all the shares in Corporation X, a U.S. business. The transaction is a covered transaction.
( 4 ) *Example 4.* Corporation A is organized under the laws of a foreign state, is wholly owned and controlled by a foreign national, and is not an excepted investor. With a view towards circumventing section 721, Corporation A transfers money to a U.S. citizen, who, pursuant to informal arrangements with Corporation A and on its behalf, makes a non-controlling minority equity investment in Corporation X, an unaffiliated TID U.S. business that maintains and collects sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens. In connection with the investment, the U.S. citizen is afforded the right to be involved in substantive decisionmaking regarding the release of sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens maintained by Corporation X. The transaction is a covered transaction.
Note 1 to § 800.213 :
Any transaction described in (a) through (d) of this section that arises pursuant to a bankruptcy proceeding or other form of default on debt is a covered transaction. See also § 800.306 for the treatment of certain lending transactions.
[85 FR 3124, Jan. 17, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 57128, Sept. 15, 2020]
# C_2005191EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 August 2005

(2005/C 191/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2319 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69385 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3385 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5571 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9556 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5736 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,890 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0749 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4381 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,825 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6233 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5990 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4984 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5767 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7879 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0363 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 246,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9809 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9817 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 998,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,625 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,900 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0690 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,787 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2319

JPY

Japanese yen

137,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69385

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3385

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5571

ISK

Iceland króna

78,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9556

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5736

CZK

Czech koruna

29,890

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0749

RON

Romanian leu

3,4381

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,825

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6233

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5990

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4984

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5767

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7879

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0363

KRW

South Korean won

1 246,07

ZAR

South African rand

7,9809

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9817

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 998,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,625

PHP

Philippine peso

68,900

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0690

THB

Thai baht

50,787

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---