alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C.,  Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 1976 (U.S.C. § 552b, as amended) and 41 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR 102-3. 140 through 160, the Department of the Army announces the following committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Army Science Board (ASB).                    

*Date(s) of Meeting:*                         Sept 15, 2009.                    

*Time(s) of Meeting:*                         1230-1430.                    

*Location:*                         Institute for Defense Analysis, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria VA 22311.                    

*Purpose:*                         The purpose of this meeting is to adopt a subcommittee's finding and recommendations on survivability and deployability of ground platforms and hear opinions by the Army Science Board.                    

*Proposed Agenda:*

1230-1330 Survivability and Deployability Subcommittee Reports;

1330-1430 Discussion and Votes;

1430 Adjourn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For information please contact Mr. Justin Bringhurst at                         *justin.bringhurst@us.army.mil*                         or (703) 604-7468 or Carolyn German at                         *carolyn.t.german@us.army.mil*                         or (703) 604-7490.                              ( print page 44829)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-20914 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
HomeIraq

# Iraq

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

416 items

        -    DS Memorial  		Gobind Raj Limbu	  November 25, 2004 
        -    DS Memorial  		Bhim Bahadur Gurung	  November 25, 2004 
        -    DS Memorial  		Tilak Ram Bhat Chhetri	  November 25, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Iraq (04-1031) – Agreement on Diplomatic and Consular Property	  October 31, 2004 
        -    		Edward Joseph  Seitz	  October 24, 2004 
        -    DS Memorial  		Edward Joseph Seitz	  October 24, 2004 
        -    		John Albert  Pinsonneault	  October 14, 2004 
        -    		Steven Ray  Osborne	  October 14, 2004 
        -    		Eric  Miner	  October 14, 2004 
        -    		Ferdinand  Ibabao	  October 14, 2004 

previous page1…39404142next page

Back to Top
CENTENNIAL BANK [LOGO]                                  Administrative
                              Member FDIC               Offices
Open for business.                                      675 Oak
                                                        P.O. Box 1560
                                                        Eugene, OR 97440
                                                        (541) 342-3970
                                                        FAX (541) 342-1425


                            LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR A
                               BORROWER-IN-CUSTODY


     May 4, 2000


     Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
     101 Market Street
     San Francisco, California  94105


     Attention:   Rick Miller


     In consideration of being able to request advances from you and your making
     advances to us secured by our pledge to you of collateral that you will
     permit us to hold in safekeeping for you, and to secure any advance or
     indebtedness or other obligation to you that we may incur, we agree to the
     provisions of Appendix B to your Operating Circular No. 10, effective
     January 2, 1998, as amended from time to time.


     CENTENNIAL BANK


     By: /S/ MICHAEL J. NYSINGH
        ----------------------------
     Michael J. Nysingh
     Senior Vice President
     and Cashier
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6599
In Re: THOMAS CARVER STEPHENS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-83) Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Carver Stephens, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Carver Stephens petitions this court for a writ of mandamus and requests that we stay district court proceedings in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) action. The district court has entered a final order denying relief on Stephens’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
#### Louie L. WAINWRIGHT and Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Appellants, v. Larry Edward TURNER, James Benner Bailey, Jr., William G. Brooker, Richard Lee Rieser, Howard Gene Kilgore, and John Michael Haddon, Appellees.

No. 58572.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 30, 1980.

Michael H. Davidson, General Counsel for the Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Richard A. Belz and Thomas A. Daniel of the Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Gainesville, for appellees.

ALDERMAN, Justice.

The issue to be resolved in this appeal is whether the open public meetings law, section 286.011, Florida Statutes (1977), applies to parole revocations meetings of the Parole and Probation Commission.1 Construing *1182article IV, section 8, and article II, section 3, Florida Constitution (1968), the First District Court of Appeal held that it did.2 We agree and affirm the decision of the district court.

In defense of its failure to comply with section 286.011, the Commission contends that under article IV, section 8(c), parole revocation is a function of the executive branch and is akin to the pardon power, which historically and constitutionally is a matter of executive grace, to be exercised on occasions and in a manner determined by the executive, free of legislative or judicial control. The Commission concedes that section 8(c), which provides that a parole and probation commission “may be created by law,” is not self-executing. It contends, however, that despite the fact that it was created by law, in dispensing paroles, it partakes of the executive’s immunity from legislative control.

The district court, in a well-reasoned and articulate opinion written by Judge Robert Smith, rejected the Commission’s arguments and correctly decided this case based upon the historical and constitutional distinction between the executive’s pardon power and its parole power. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is affirmed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1

. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution (1972).

2

. *Turner v. Wainwright,*379 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
# Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Releases

128 items

        -    Remarks  		The Nexus of International Security and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsOctober 5, 2023Henry L. Stimson CenterWashington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		The United States’ General Debate Statement for the United Nations 78th General Assembly’s First Committee	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsOctober 2, 2023New York City, New York 
        -    Remarks  		“The Future of Arms Control”	  Alexandra BellSeptember 19, 2023Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation Annual ConferenceWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Israel, Turkey	  August 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Brazil, Peru	  August 11, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at Aligning Action’s “Oppenheimer” Screening	  Mallory StewartJuly 26, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		12th U.S.-EU Space Dialogue Held in Brussels	  June 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Japan Extended Deterrence Dialogue	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart and Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Brussels	  June 23, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Renewal of the Charter for the Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board	  June 2, 2023 

previous page1…34567…13next page

Back to Top
HomeNicaragua

# Nicaragua

138 items

        -    Press Statement  		New Listings Under the Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report	  Matthew MillerDecember 21, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 21, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 21, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Visa Restriction Policy for Flight Operators Facilitating Irregular Migration	  Matthew MillerNovember 21, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Accountability for Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo Following OAS Departure	  November 19, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		This Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Every Week, the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs Works to Build Sustainable Businesses Worldwide	  November 17, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Managua, Nicaragua: American Nicaraguan School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 30, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability for Nicaraguan Officials for Restricting Freedoms	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Nicaragua National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability for the Ortega-Murillo Regime for Restricting Freedoms	  August 19, 2023 

previous page1234…14next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3028

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released from

incarceration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1996

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been

released from incarceration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Rights of

5 Former Offenders Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

7 The right of a citizen of the United States, who other8 wise is qualified, to vote in any election for Federal office

9 shall not be denied or abridged because he has committed

10 a criminal offense unless such citizen is imprisoned in a
2

•HR 3028 IH

1 correctional institution or facility at the time of such elec2 tion.

3 SEC. 3. STATE REQUIREMENTS.

4 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the

5 States from establishing requirements for the holding of

6 State or local elective office; nor from enacting any State

7 law which affords the right to vote in any election for Fed8 eral office on terms less restrictive than those established

9 by this Act.

10 SEC. 4. OFFENSE.

11 Whoever intentionally denies or attempts to deny any

12 person any right secured by this Act shall be fined under

13 title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than

14 one year, or both.

15 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

16 For purposes of this Act—

17 (1) the term ‘‘correctional institution or facil18 ity’’ means any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other in19 stitution or facility for the confinement of individ20 uals convicted of criminal offenses, except that such

21 term does not include any residential community

22 treatment center (or similar public or private facil23 ity);

24 (2) the term ‘‘election’’ means (A) a general,

25 special, primary, or runoff election, (B) a convention
3

•HR 3028 IH

1 or caucus of a political party held to nominate a

2 candidate, (C) a primary election held for the selec3 tion of delegates to a national nominating conven4 tion of a political party, or (D) a primary election

5 held for the expression of a preference for the nomi6 nation of persons for election to the office of Presi7 dent; and

8 (3) the term ‘‘Federal office’’ means the office

9 of President or Vice President of the United States,

10 or of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or

11 Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the

12 United States.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              This   Schedule    contains   summary    financial
                              information    extracted    from   the   Condensed
                              Consolidated  Balance  Sheet at March 31, 1996 and
                              the   Condensed    Consolidated    Statements   of
                              Operations  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
                              reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          9,036,839  
<SECURITIES>                                            0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0  
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0  
<INVENTORY>                                     3,161,909  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,584,313  
<PP&E>                                          5,890,909  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,400,769  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,583,868  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,270,401  
<BONDS>                                         1,389,410  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             489,000  
<PREFERRED>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                          214,799  
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,606,692  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,583,868  
<SALES>                                         9,699,939  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,699,939  
<CGS>                                           5,172,951  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,172,951  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,857,860  
<INCOME-TAX>                                      877,000  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,006,221  
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0  
<CHANGES>                                               0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,006,221  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.20  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.18  
                                                  
                                                   

</TABLE>
#### Roosevelt PEAK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 10, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, and Thomas R. Mott, Certified Legal Intern, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward M. Chew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dayto-na Beach, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to one count of attempted murder and two counts of burglary, without reserving the right to appeal any ruling of the trial court. Pursuant to the plea bargain negotiations, he was given a split sentence of five years imprisonment (with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years because a firearm was used) to be followed by ten years probation on the attempted murder count, and three years concurrent probation on each of the burglary counts.

He contends on appeal that his plea was not voluntary because he was not advised of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence, and asks that we permit him to withdraw his plea. We have limited jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a judgment based on a nolo plea where nothing has been reserved for appeal.1 Any contention that the plea was not of a voluntary or intelligent character should first be presented to the trial court in a motion to withdraw the plea. *Robinson v. State,*373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); *In the Interest of S.C. v. State,*388 So.2d 643 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Appellant also contends on appeal that the split sentence is improper under the principles of *Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission,*396 So.2d 1107 (1981) [1981 FLW 313], However valid his contention might be had the sentence followed a trial and conviction, here it resulted from a plea bargain and we cannot give the appellant relief from his bargain without also offering the state the same relief. *See Jolly v. State,*392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA *10441981); *Cleveland v. State,*394 So.2d 230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

*Villery*does not address *negotiated*split sentences which are otherwise within the limits prescribed by law. Because the sentence and the plea are intertwined,2 the appellant must seek his relief, if any, from the trial court upon proper application. If the appellant is not bound by the plea negotiation, then neither is the State, and relief is available in the trial court.

The appeal is dismissed, but without prejudice to the right of appellant to seek appropriate relief in the trial court.

Appeal DISMISSED.

SHARP, W., and COWART, JJ., concur.

1

. Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.172(c)(iv); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140 (b)(1).

2

. *Cf. Pendarvis v. State,*400 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Randall Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company do each
hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date: November 21, 2005


By: /S/ Randall Jones
-----------------------
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2918 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2918

 To deny funds to educational programs that allow corporal punishment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1996

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To deny funds to educational programs that allow corporal punishment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST CORPORAL PUNISHMENT.

    Subpart 4 of part C of the General Education Provisions Act is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``prohibition against corporal punishment
    ``Sec. 444A. (a) No funds shall be made available under any 
applicable program to any educational agency, institution, 
organization, or other entity that has a policy which allows an 
individual to inflict corporal punishment or bodily pain upon a child 
as a form of punishment.
    ``(b) The prohibition described in subsection (a) does not preclude 
an individual, within the scope of employment, from using and applying 
such amount of physical restraint as may be reasonable and necessary--
            ``(1) to protect self, a child, or others from physical 
        injury;
            ``(2) to obtain possession of a weapon or other dangerous 
        object upon the person or within the control of the child; or
            ``(3) to protect property from serious damage.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeLibya

# Libya

130 items

        -    Remarks  		Transcript of the Transatlantic Trends 2021 Launch Event: A Conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman	  Wendy R. ShermanJune 9, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Egyptian President Al Sisi 	  May 26, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary of State Joey Hood and Special Envoy Richard Norland Visit to Libya	  May 18, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Libya	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 10, 2021	  Ned PriceMay 10, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Appointment of Ambassador Richard Norland as U.S. Special Envoy for Libya	  Ned PriceMay 10, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Libya	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 23, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 23, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Libyan Interim Prime Minister Dabaiba	  March 22, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 18, 2021Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…7891011…13next page

Back to Top