alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Zook Estate

*138
      *Alfred C. Alspach,*for exceptants.

May 28, 1954.

Bowman, P. J.,

John M. Zook, who died December 13, 1952, directed in his will that his residuary estate shall be divided, equally between his daughters, Ruth Pauline Zook and Evelyn Zook. Included in the residuary estate are five lots of land upon which is erected a two-story brick apartment house situated in the Borough of Elizabethtown, Lancaster County. This real estate was appraised for transfer inheritance tax purposes at $39,000 and was included in the executor’s first and final account at the same value.

In an adjudication filed December 10, 1953,. we awarded to each of the daughters an undivided one-half interest in and to this unconverted real estate. .

Exceptions were filed to this award by the daughters. They allege that the court erred in not awarding the real estate to them as joint tenants with the right of survivorship in accordance with a request and stipulation signed by them and filed with the petition for adjudication.

This stipulation, which is the basis for the exceptions, requests “. . . the Orphans’ Court of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, to decree that the property known as the apartment house situate on the west side of Hanover Street. . . shall be held by us both as tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common”.

How these distributees desire to hold this real estate is not for the court to decide or decree. We see nothing in the Fiduciaries Act of April 18,1949, P. L. 512, which precludes the eourt from awarding real estate in a schedule of distribution to an assignee of devisees upon presentation at the audit of a properly executed assignment or instrument of conveyance. *139Indeed we have done so on prior occasions. See, also, McCormick Estate, 1 Fid. Rep. 225. We do not, however, in the instant case regard the request to. the court to decree as to how the daughters shall hold the real estate an effective assignment or instrument of conveyance upon which an award to an assignee should be framed. We see no error in so holding.
# C_2005158EN.01003001.xml

| 29.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/30

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3781 — Credit Agricole/Caisse D'Epargne/JV)

(2005/C 158/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3781. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3781. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
ACTIO N 

X 

SlO-110125-032 

CONTROL NO 

January 25, 2011 r p,\RTViENT OF 

• 'PORTATION 

)N3 

; ' i*v '. \ PI : SU The Honorable Ray LaHood ' -' " ' ' ^ ^ 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavus. 

Petersburg. Wranqell. and Yakutat. Alaska. Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to our community. 

Alaska's current pattern of service - using jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major 

communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route 

system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 737-400 

combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet 

carrier simply cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with 

Required fslavigation Performance Technology precision technology, which enables the 

airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions 

and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the 

community. In sum, Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for 

more than thirty years. 

Sincerely, 

Tasha L. Peterman 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and 

Public Facilities 
Pettiford, Marie (OST) 

From: Tasha Peterman [tashapeterman@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 12:32 PM 

To: LaHood, Ray (OST); Kurland, Susan (OST); Devany. Dennis (OST); 

Sean.parnell@alaska.gov; Marc.luiken@alaska.gov 

Subject: EAS letter of support 2011 

Attachments: EAS letter of support 2011 signed.doc 

A letter of my support. 

Sincerely, 

Tasha L. Peterman 

-a-

:i^ . :^.t=, 

o9^ 

e n CO
#### § 585.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0125

ROBERT G.HORNBACK,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. ORDER 

# E MAR 10 2020

Bowen Grez.-riwood Clerk of Supreme Court Stato of Montana Chad Wright,Appellate Defender,has petitioned for an out-of-time appeal from the OrderDenying Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw GuiltyPlea entered September 23,2019,by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, in Cause No. DV 18-02. The Attorney General's Office does not oppose this petition. Hornback, representing himself, filed a petition for habeas corpus, which became Cause No.DV 18-02 in the District Court. Hornback' s petition challenged his conviction and sentence as a persistent felony offender in Cause No. DC 87-72. The District Court granted Hornback's petition and set a resentencing hearing. Hornback obtained appointed counsel and moved to withdraw his guilty plea he had entered in DC 87-72. The District Court denied the rnotion on September 23 2019, but entered the denial order in DV 18-02. The court then held the resentencing hearing on December 3, 2019,and entered its amended sentence in both DC 87-72 and DV 18-02. On January 3, 2020, Hornback timely filed a notice of appeal from DC 87-72. He now seeks leave under M.R.App.P.4(5)to file an out-of-time appeal from DV 18-02 because he alleges the cases are interconnected and theDecember 3,2019resentencing order affects both. Wright asserts that ifthe Courtgrants this petition,Hornback will consolidate DC 87-72 and DV 18-02 into one case on appeal. 03/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0125We grant out-of-time appeals under M. R.App.P.4(6)when an appellantestablishes the existence of"extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage of justice." If this Court were to reject Hornback's untimely notice of appeal in this case, the interconnected nature ofthese matters could adversely affecthis rights as to the timely filed' appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for an out-of-time appeal is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall have thirty days from the date of this Order within which to prepare, file, and serve a Notice ofAppeal and a Request for Transcripts in compliance with the Montana Rules ofAppellate Procedure. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord.

41— DATED this 

### I b day ofMarch,2020.

2
HomeIran

# Iran

587 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Italian Foreign Minister Tajani	  April 17, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 16, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 16, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 15, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 15, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with UK Foreign Secretary Cameron and German Foreign Minister Baerbock	  April 14, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  April 14, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  April 14, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Jordanian Foreign Minister Safadi	  April 14, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud	  April 14, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 

previous page12345…59next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 282

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the types of equipment which may be acquired with tax-exempt financing by volunteer

fire departments and to provide a comparable treatment for emergency

medical service organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

the types of equipment which may be acquired with

tax-exempt financing by volunteer fire departments and

to provide a comparable treatment for emergency medical

service organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF EQUIPMENT OF VOLUNTEER

4 FIRE DEPARTMENTS ELIGIBLE FOR TAX-EX5 EMPT FINANCING.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

7 150(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•HR 282 IH

1 to bonds of certain volunteer fire departments) is amended

2 by striking ‘‘or firetruck’’ and inserting ‘‘firetruck, ambu3 lance, or other emergency response vehicle’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act.

7 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE

8 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER TAX-EXEMPT BONDS

9 RULES.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 150 of

11 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesig12 nating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting

13 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

14 ‘‘(3) COMPARABLE TREATMENT FOR VOLUN15 TEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ORGANIZA16 TIONS.—

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An organization which

18 provides volunteer emergency medical services

19 shall be treated for purposes of this subsection

20 as if—

21 ‘‘(i) such organization were a volun22 teer fire department, and

23 ‘‘(ii) such services were firefighting

24 services.
3

•HR 282 IH

1 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of ap2 plying this subsection to an organization de3 scribed in subparagraph (A) which does not

4 provide firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)

5 shall be applied by substituting ‘other emer6 gency medical services’ for ‘other firefighting

7 services’.’’

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 598.505 Investment and reinvestment of certain funds. Subject to the requirements of § 598.206, U.S. financial institutions are authorized to invest and reinvest assets held in blocked accounts in the name of a specially designated narcotics trafficker, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The assets representing such investments and reinvestments are credited to a blocked account or subaccount that is held in the same name at the same U.S. financial institution, or within the possession or control of a U.S. person, but in no case may funds be transferred outside the United States for this purpose;
( b ) The proceeds of such investments and reinvestments are not credited to a blocked account or subaccount under any name or designation that differs from the name or designation of the specific blocked account or subaccount in which such funds or securities were held; and
( c ) No immediate financial or economic benefit accrues (e.g., through pledging or other use) to the specially designated narcotics trafficker.
#### § 561.320 Iranian financial institution.

The term *Iranian financial institution* means any entity (including foreign branches), wherever located, organized under the laws of Iran or any jurisdiction within Iran, or owned or controlled by the Government of Iran, or in Iran, or owned or controlled by any of the foregoing, that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money service businesses, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and holding companies, affiliates, or subsidiaries of any of the foregoing.

[77 FR 66920, Nov. 8, 2012]
#### § 585.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 16, 2020

Before

    JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

    MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge

    AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 19‐3158

JOHN MYERS,                            

Petitioner‐Appellee,

v.

RON NEAL,  

         Respondent‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of

Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

No. 1:16‐cv‐2023

James R. Sweeney, II,

Judge.

O R D E R

Petitioner‐appellee filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on

September 1, 2020. No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the

petition for rehearing en banc and all members of the original panel have voted to deny

rehearing and to issue an amended opinion. The court’s opinion dated August 4, 2020 is

amended by the attached opinion, which includes changes on pages 30 and 31.  

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and rehearing en

banc is therefore DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of InMedica  Development  Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of
the  Company  on Form  10QSB for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004 fully
complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information  contained in such report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
periods and the results of operations of the Company for such periods.


/s/ Ralph Henson
Ralph Henson,
 Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004


/s/ Richard Bruggeman
Richard Bruggeman,
 Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT[dash]IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.
    Time and Place: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 from 9:30 a.m. to 12 
p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 
1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Agenda items include a short summary of the Bank's recent 
activities, plus reports from the two Subcommittees of the 2009 
Advisory Committee members.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a 
photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance 
process into the building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be 
placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such 
as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please 
contact, prior to September 5, 2009, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Phone: (202) 565-3232.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.

Jonathan Cordone, Sr.,
Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-20707 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
<HTML>
<HEAD>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<FONT SIZE=5><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=6><P ALIGN="CENTER">EXHIBIT  23.0</P>
</B></FONT><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<B><P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<FONT SIZE=3><P ALIGN="CENTER">CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS</P>
</FONT><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
</B><FONT SIZE=3><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Numbers 33-14356 on Form S-8 dated May 15, 1987, 33-53188 on Form S-8 dated October 13, 1992, 33-59673 on Form S-8 dated May 30, 1995, 333-39347
on Form S-8 dated November 3, 1997 and 333-65315 on Form S-8 dated October 5, 1998, of our report dated February 11, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Moto Photo, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"> </P>
<U><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">/s/ Ernst & Young LLP</P>
</U><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">Ernst & Young LLP</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">Dayton, Ohio</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">March 23, 2000</P></FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744

To require the Postmaster General to submit to the Congress a plan for

the reduction of the accumulated debt of the Postal Service within

seven years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require the Postmaster General to submit to the Congress

a plan for the reduction of the accumulated debt of

the Postal Service within seven years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Service Debt

5 Reduction and Truth in Budgeting Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. POSTAL SERVICE DEBT REDUCTION PLAN RE7 QUIREMENT.

8 Not later than three months after the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Postmaster General shall submit
2

•HR 2744 IH

1 to the Congress a plan for the reduction of the accumu2 lated debt of the Postal Service to an amount that is not

3 more than five percent of the annual revenues of the Post4 al Service. The plan shall provide for—

5 (1) achievement of the reduction not later than

6 September 30, 2003; and

7 (2) subject to section 3, maintenance of the ac8 cumulated debt at a level not more than five percent

9 of the annual revenues of the Postal Service.

10 SEC. 3. LIMITED ADDITIONAL POSTAL SERVICE BORROW11 ING AUTHORITY IF DEBT REDUCTION IS

12 ACHIEVED.

13 If the reduction described in section 2 is achieved,

14 the Postal Service shall have the authority, on and after

15 October 1, 2005, to have accumulated debt of not more

16 than 7.5 percent of the annual revenues of the Postal

17 Service. Any exercise of such authority shall be permitted

18 only to the extent specifically provided for by law.

19 SEC. 4. BUDGET SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT.

20 In the submission to the Congress of the budget for

21 the Postal Service for a fiscal year, the Postmaster Gen22 eral shall include a detailed accounting of actual and

23 budgeted revenues and expenditures for the preceding fis24 cal year.

Æ