alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 501.745 Orders and decisions: signature, date and public availability. ( a ) *Signature required.* All orders and decisions of the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee shall be signed.
( b ) *Date of entry of orders.* The date of entry of an order by the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee shall be the date the order is signed. Such date shall be reflected in the caption of the order, or if there is no caption, in the order itself.
( c ) *Public availability of orders.* ( 1 ) In general, any final order of the Department shall be made public. Any supporting findings or opinions relating to a final order shall be made public at such time as the final order is made public.
( 2 ) *Exception.* Any final order of the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee pertaining to an application for confidential treatment shall only be available to the public in accordance with § 501.725(b)(3).
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., O’Brien Interest, 

Inc., and Shannon Wilkerson

Appellate case number: 01-22-00867-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-74906

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

On November 22, 2022, relators, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., O’Brien 

Interest, Inc., and Shannon Wilkerson, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging 

the trial court’s November 2, 2022 “Order Denying [Relators’] Motion for Leave to 

Designate Responsible Third Party.” Relators allege that the trial court abused its 

discretion by refusing to designate Jim McCord as a responsible third party in the 

underlying litigation.

On November 29, 2022, the Court requested a response from any real party in 

interest, due on or before December 19, 2022. On December 9, 2022, real party in interest, 

Roberto Ramirez, filed a motion to extend time to file a response, requesting that the 

deadline to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus be extended to January 18, 

2023. The Court granted Ramirez’s request and extended the deadline for filing a response. 

On January 11, 2023, Ramirez filed a second motion to extend the deadline for filing a 

response, requesting the deadline be extended an additional seven days, making the 

deadline to file January 25, 2023. 

The motion states the requested extension is not opposed by any party. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.1 (a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). Ramirez’s motion is granted. The deadline for filing a 

response to the petition for writ of mandamus is extended to January 25, 2023.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ April Farris______________________________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 19, 2023____
#### § 586.401 [Reserved]
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-06-122576-CV

JACKIE COLLINSMiItTxX, LtTdD., WhHiItTeE ReEnNoO InNvVeEsStToOrRsS, LtTdD., 	APPELLANTS

AND WeElLlLsS ReEnNoO InNvVeEsStToOrRsS, LtTdD.	APPELLANT

	V.

TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICTGoOrRdDoOnN S. SwWiIfFtT CoOnNsSuUlLtTiInNgG EnNgGiInNeEeErR, InNcC.	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 236thTH236TH  DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------NO. 2-08-181   -        -CV

ThHoOmMaAsS JoOhHnNsSoOnN	APPELLANT	

	V.

ThHeE CaAdDlLeE CoOmMpPaAnNyY	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE  158TH158TH        DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON            COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On jUNEJune 3, 2008 aUGUST                           August 9July 5, 2006, we notified appellant[s] that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed theis court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant[s], within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.  

	Because appellant[s] [hasves/have] not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

	Appellant[s] shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		 	

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.   GARNDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:   August 3 0, 1, 20062006July 27, 2006June 256LYly 3, 2008
- Office Home
- What We Do
- Contact Us

HomeKey Topics – Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs...Contact Us – Office of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia

# 									Contact Us – Office of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia							

Office of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia

EUR | ACE Front Office:   +1-202-647-5102

EUR | ACE email:  EUR-ACE-DL@state.gov

EUR | ACE Location: HST Room 4227​

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsForeign AssistanceOffice of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# C_2005168EN.01005201.xml

| 8.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/52

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3816 — Apax/Mölnlycke)

(2005/C 168/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3816. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3816. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationAssembly Component Systems, Inc.
    
    IllinoisAutomatic Screw Machine Products Company, Inc.(1)
    
    AlabamaC.B. Lynn Company
    
    IllinoisCronatron Welding Systems, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaDrummond American Corporation
    
    IllinoisLawson Products de Mexico S. de RL. de C.v.
    
    MexicoLawson Products, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaLawson Products, Inc.
    
    NevadaLawson Products, Inc.
    
    New JerseyLawson Products, Inc.
    
    TexasLawson Products, Inc. (Ontario)
    
    Ontario, CanadaLP Industrial Products Company
    
    IllinoisLP Service Co.
    
    IllinoisLPI Holdings, Inc.
    
    IllinoisRutland Tool & Supply Co.
    
    Nevada
 
 (1)
    
    subsidiary of Assembly Component Systems, Inc.
HomeEquatorial Guinea

# Equatorial Guinea

51 items

        -    TIAS  		Equatorial Guinea (12963) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  June 11, 1998 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE  YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         112,605
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  404,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,512
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         11,316,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,879,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,326,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        8,073,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,176,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,326,606
<SALES>                                        2,919,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,228,662
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,414,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             509,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (694,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (694,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (694,796)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET;THEREFORE THE VALUE IS $0.
</FN>




</TABLE>
HomeOffice of Public Liaison...Office of Public Liaison  Releases

# Office of Public Liaison Releases

148 items

        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jose W. Fernandez’s Travel to Houston, Texas	  December 1, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary McKeon Travels to Camp Atterbury in Indiana	  November 30, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Bureau Official Nancy Izzo Jackson Travels to Brattleboro, VT 	  October 28, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Ian Brownlee Travels to Tucson, El Paso, Nogales (Sonora), and Ciudad Juárez	  July 19, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Readout of Deputy Secretary Brian P. McKeon Meetings in Atlanta and Clarkston, Georgia	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Brian P. McKeon Travels to Atlanta and Clarkston, Georgia	  June 23, 2021 
        -    		Office of Public Liaison	  January 20, 2021 
        -    		Foreign Policy Classroom	   

previous page1…131415

Back to Top
§ 801.210 Pilot program covered transaction. The term *pilot program covered transaction* means: ( a ) Any pilot program covered investment; or
( b ) Any transaction by or with any foreign person that could result in foreign control of any pilot program U.S. business, including such a transaction carried out through a joint venture.
#### § 91.11 Dogs and other animals.

Dogs and other animals, except seeing-eye dogs, shall not be brought upon the property for other than official purposes.
Federal Executive BoardsSearch:

Main

Board Leadership

Committees & Councils

Contact Information

Events

Emergency Preparedness

Annual Plans & Reports

Useful Links

Greater

Boston

#                 	Annual Plans and Reports              	

Annual Reports- 2016 Greater Boston Federal Executive Board (GBFEB) Annual Report  
- 2015 Greater Boston Federal Executive Board (GBFEB) Annual Report  
- 2014 Greater Boston Federal Executive Board (GBFEB) Annual Report  
- 2013 Greater Boston Federal Executive Board (GBFEB) Annual Report  

FOIA.gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Readers & Viewers | Contact GBFEB | USA.govFEB Websites:FEB WebsitesFEBAtlantaBaltimoreBostonBuffaloChicagoCincinnatiClevelandColoradoDetroitHonoluluHoustonKansas CityLos AngelesMinnesotaNewarkNew MexicoNew OrleansNew YorkOklahomaPhiladelphiaPittsburghSouth FloridaGo

Federal Aviation Administration
#### § 6.1 Purpose of these rules.

The Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504 (called “the Act” in this part), provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (called “adversary adjudications”) before agencies of the Government of the United States. An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails over an agency, unless the agency's position in the proceeding was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The rules in this part describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the Treasury Department will use to make them.
§ 548.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 548.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 548.407 .
*See also* § 548.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
#### § 700.5 Compliance with signs and directions.

Persons in and on the property shall comply with the instructions of uniformed FLETC security officers, other authorized officials, official signs of a prohibitory or directory nature, and all applicable statutes and regulations.
#### § 802.603 Materiality.

The Committee generally will not consider as material minor inaccuracies, omissions, or changes relating to financial or commercial factors not having a bearing on national security.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Pijush Kanti  Sarkar

# 				Pijush Kanti  Sarkar			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				January 22, 2002			

**Kolkata Police Department image**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIndia

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy...Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy 2  Releases

# Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Releases

110 items

        -    		Steve  Lang	  December 2, 2022 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Third U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council Ministerial Meeting	  December 1, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador at Large Fick’s Travel to Ethiopia	  November 28, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at a U.S.-German Futures Forum Moderated Discussion with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 3, 2022Atlantic HotelMunster, Germany 
        -    Media Note  		Global Emerging Leaders in International Cyberspace Security (GEL-ICS) Fellowship	  October 21, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman to Visit Tokyo and Seattle	  October 19, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 17, 2022SLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryMenlo Park, California 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to California, October 16-17	  Ned PriceOctober 13, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Names Dr. Kelly Fletcher as Chief Information Officer	  October 6, 2022 
        -    		Global Emerging Leaders in International Cyberspace Security (GEL-ICS) Fellowship	   

previous page1…7891011next page

Back to Top
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Numbers 33-10784 on Form S-3 dated December 24, 1986, 33-14356 on Form S-8 dated
May 15, 1987, and 33-53188 on Form S-8 dated October 13, 1992 of our report
dated March 1, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Moto Photo, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Ernst & Young LLP

Dayton, Ohio
March 27, 1996
#### § 902.5 Further review of compromise offers.

If an agency is uncertain whether to accept a firm, written, substantive compromise offer on a debt that is within the agency's delegated compromise authority, it may refer the offer to the Civil Division or other appropriate litigating division in the Department of Justice, using a CCLR accompanied by supporting data and particulars concerning the debt. The Department of Justice may act upon such an offer or return it to the agency with instructions or advice.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

152889(78)

BETTINA WINKLER, by her next friends

HELGA DAHM WINKLER and MARVIN 

WINKLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 152889

v COA: 323511 

Oakland CC: 2014-141112-CZ

MARIST FATHERS OF DETROIT, INC., d/b/a

NOTRE DAME PREPARATORY HIGH

SCHOOL AND MARIST ACADEMY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion of the parties to extend the time for 

filing their supplemental briefs is GRANTED. The supplemental briefs will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before January 31, 2017.
HomeFrance

# France

362 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with French Foreign Minister Colonna	  January 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Advancing Sustainable, Resilient Infrastructure	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces Key Measures to Jump Start Deployments of Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems and to Secure Nuclear Fuel Supply Chains, Accelerating the Contribution of Nuclear Energy to Net Zero Goals	  December 5, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: France	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to France and Belgium	  November 9, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State Lee Satterfield Travels to France	  November 9, 2023 

previous page123456…37next page

Back to Top
No. 16,993.

#### The Baltimore and Ohio and Chicago Railroad Company *v.*Sawvel, Treasurer, et al.

From the Porter Circuit Court. •.

*J. H. Collins, W. H. Dowdell*and *A. C. Harris,*for appellant.

*A. G. Smith,*Attorney-General, *W. Bansburg*and *A. L. Jones,*for appellees.

Hackney, C. J.

The appellant sued the appellees Beuben Sawvel, treasurer of DeKalb county; Joseph M. Shew, treasurer of Noble county; John M. Bunyan, treasurer of Kosciusko county; Franklin G. Bomaine, treasurer of Elkhart county; George H. Storer, treas*697urer of St. Joseph county; Arthur D. Senour, as treasurer of Marshall county; Allen W. Reynolds, treasurer of Porter county; S. S. Bosserinan, treasurer of LaPorte county, and Thomas McCay, treasurer of Lake county. The lower court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and that ruling presents the only error assigned. All the questions here presented were fully considered and decided in *Cleveland, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 513; *Indianapolis, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 609; *Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 625, and confirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States May—, 1894. The questions so decided involved the powers, duties and procedure before the State Board of Tax Commissioners and the constitutionality of the tax law of March 6, 1891, Acts 1891, p. 199; R. S. 1894, section 8408 *et seq.*

Filed June 20, 1894.

Upon the authority of the cases cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, and the restraining order, heretofore issued by this court herein, is dissolved.
# Lithuania

120 items

        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Lithuania	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Liechtenstein	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Lithuania	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Lithuania	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Lithuania	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		North Macedonia Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Denmark and Lithuania, May 31, 2019	   
        -    Report  		Lithuania	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Lithuania	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Lithuania	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Lithuania	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…789101112next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              MARCH 31
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                      1998              1997
                                                   -----------       -----------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>         
Net income (loss)                                  $ 2,345,430       $(4,894,633)
                                                   ===========       ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding           8,101,001         6,292,662

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options                381,242           242,812

Add back of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                         --          (242,812)
                                                   -----------       -----------
Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                              8,482,243         6,292,662
                                                   ===========       ===========
Basic net income (loss) per share                  $      0.29       $     (0.78)
                                                   ===========       ===========
Diluted net income (loss) per share                $      0.28       $     (0.78)
                                                   ===========       ===========
</TABLE>