alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-1860

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Norman Ray Woodall, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 6, 1997

 Filed: February 11, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Norman Ray Woodall appeals the district court's denial of his motion 1

for return of items seized from him by state authorities when they arrested

him, some of which were later used in his federal prosecution. We affirm.

A postconviction filing for return of property seized in connection

with a criminal case is treated as a civil equitable action, which the

district court where the claimant was tried has ancillary jurisdiction to

hear. See Thompson v. Covington, 47 F.3d 974, 975 (8th Cir. 1995) (per

curiam). The district court properly denied Woodall's motion as to items

he claims were taken in an "ATF booking." The government states that it

has no record of such a booking, and that it does not possess items from

any such booking. 
-2-

Although a mere assertion by the government that it does not have Woodall's

property would not render the issue moot, see id., Woodall failed to

specify the date of this alleged booking or the items taken at that time.

The district court also properly denied the motion as to items that

were used as evidence in Woodall's federal trial and then returned to the

state authorities. The items were outside the possession of the federal

government, cf. United States v. Wingfield, 822 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir.

1987) (federal jurisdiction over seized property in federal control), and

were seized by state authorities pursuant to a state court warrant, without

any federal participation in the seizure, cf. United States v. Huffhines,

986 F.2d 306, 308 (9th Cir. 1993) (Rule 41 jurisdiction in federal court

reaches only as far as state searches with direct federal authorization).

Finally, the government is not accountable for state-seized items that it

never possessed or used as evidence. See id. at 307-08.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
HomeIceland

# Iceland

95 items

        -    Media Note  		United States-Iceland Economic Partnership Dialogue	  April 11, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Reykjavik, Iceland: International School of Iceland: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 22, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Iceland	  November 13, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Reykjavik, Iceland: International School of Iceland: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 3, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Human Rights and Democracy  		Expanding the Global Equality Fund and Protecting Human Rights with New International Partners	  August 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Iceland National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 17, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Iceland	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Ireland	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Iceland	  May 15, 2023 

123…10next page

Back to Top
# C_2005229EN.01001402.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 July 2005

in Case T-126/03 Reckitt Benckiser (España), SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Likelihood of confusion - Proof of use of earlier mark - Application for Community word mark ALADIN - Earlier national word mark ALADDIN - Articles 8(1)(b) and 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 229/28)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-126/03: Reckitt Benckiser (España), SL, established in Barcelona (Spain), represented by M. Esteve Sanz, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, I. de Medrano Caballero and A. Folliard-Monguiral), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM having been Aladin Gesellschaft für innovative mikrobiologische Systeme GmbH, established in Luckenwalde (Germany) — action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2003 (Case R 389/2002-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Reckitt Benckiser (España), SL, and Aladin Gesellschaft für innovative mikrobiologische Systeme GmbH — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and V. Vadapalas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 January 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 January 2003;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 7.6.2003.

1

---
#### § 137.421 How does an Indian Tribe request an informal conference?

The Indian Tribe must file its request for an informal conference with the office of the person whose decision it is appealing, within 30 days of the day it receives the decision. The Indian Tribe may either hand-deliver the request for an informal conference to that person's office, or mail it by certified mail, return receipt requested. If the Indian Tribe mails the request, it will be considered filed on the date the Indian Tribe mailed it by certified mail.
# New Zealand

		Subscribe		

120 items

        -    		New Zealand	  March 19, 2019 
        -    		U.S. Maritime Boundaries: Agreements and Treaties	   
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (17-1212) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Crime	  December 12, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		New Zealand (17-1002.1) – Agreement Concerning Visa and Immigration Information	  October 2, 2017 
        -    Report  		New Zealand	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1…9101112next page

Back to Top
# Mongolia

88 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mongolia	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Mongolia	  June 24, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Presidential Election in Mongolia	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 11, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mongolia	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Mongolian Foreign Minister Battsetseg	  April 19, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mongolia	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY2020: Global Equality Fund Programs in East Asia	  December 30, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Mongolia 	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mongolia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mongolia	  June 10, 2020 

previous page1…456789next page

Back to Top
#### § 137.371 Who takes title to real property purchased with funds provided under a construction project agreement?

The Self-Governance Tribe takes title to the real property unless the Self-Governance Tribe requests that the Secretary take title to the property.
#### Rafael FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1544.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 1, 1979.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1979.

Stone, Sostchin & Gonzalez and Gisela Cardonne, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendel-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ. and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to commit a felony and grand larceny by staging an automobile accident after which the participants made planned and fraudulent claims. On this appeal, appellant’s main thrust is that the court should have granted his motion for severance because of the holding of the Supreme Court of the United States in *Bruton v. U. S.,*391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). Our review of the record in the light of this argument shows that no prejudice resulted to the appellant. See *Johnson v. State,*355 So.2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); and *Ballard v. State,*323 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Appellant’s point directed to the introduction of the accident report was not error inasmuch as Section 316.066(4), Florida Statutes (1977), is not applicable to a *819staged collision which was not, under any consideration, an accident. Even if the report should be determined to have been inadmissible, we would hold that such an error was harmless in the present instance where there was no prejudice to the appellant and there was overwhelming evidence of guilt. Cf. *McKissack v. State,*243 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

The other points presented by the appellant have been examined in the light of the briefs and oral argument and have been found not to present reversible error.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000725876
<NAME>                        GATEWAY INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,604
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    767
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,863
<PP&E>                                           334
<DEPRECIATION>                                   144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,096
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           4
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,582
<SALES>                                        1,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,899
<CGS>                                            320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (366)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.09)



</TABLE>
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Cook,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934;  and 2.  The  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Gary L. Cook
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Gary L. Cook
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 16, 2005
```
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-3 (No.33-60621, No. 33-57629, No.333-81434, No. 333-83963, No.333-80611, No.333-86028,No.333-38466, No.333-51834, No.333.107976 and all the amendments thereto) and Form S-8(No.2-86474, No.2-91907, No.2-98732, No.33-6188, No.33-6203, No.33-13265, No.33-17720,No.33-30385, No.33-30386, No.33-36249, No.33-41999, No.33-42000, No.33-53054, No.33-66548,No.33-66546, No.33-55631, No.33-55633, No.33-55697, No.33-59981, No.33-59985, No.33-59987,No.333-12887, No.333-34285, No.333-57563, No.333-62159, No.333-74627, No.333-81433, No.333-81435,No.333-81437, No.333-90951, No.333-95421, No.333-38746 No.333-42888, No.333-43306, No.333-46436,No.333-52050, No.333-53584, No.333-57152, No.333-62960, No.333-66238, No.333-66240, No.333-69380,No.333.71900, No.333.96543, No.333-96549, No.333-96555, No.333-98807, No.333-106205,No.333-106206, No.333-115762 and No.333-126594) of LSI Logic Corporation of our report dated March15, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP San Jose,California
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2852

To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal certain limitations on

the operation of Department of Defense depots.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1996

Mr. TEJEDA (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. BONILLA, and Mr. SMITH of

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal certain

limitations on the operation of Department of Defense

depots.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATIONS ON OPERATION OF

4 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPOTS.

5 (a) REPEAL OF 60/40 REQUIREMENT.—Section 2466

6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking out subsections (a), (c), (d), and

8 (e); and
2

•HR 2852 IH

1 (2) by striking out ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON MAN2 AGEMENT BY END STRENGTH.—’’.

3 (b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT RELATING TO COM4 PETITION.—Section 2469 of title 10, United States Code,

5 is repealed.

6 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter

7 146 of such title is amended by striking out the items re8 lating to section 2469.

Æ
HomeBenin

# Benin

68 items

        -    Press Statement  		The Spirit of Partnership:  Implementing the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 1, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Benin: Trial and Sentencing of Political Opponents	  Ned PriceDecember 13, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Benin	  December 8, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Benin (21-901.1) – Amendment to Millennium Challenge Compact	  September 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Benin National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Benin	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Benin	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Benin	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Benin	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Arrests of Opposition Figures in Benin	  Ned PriceApril 23, 2021 

previous page1234567next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2640 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2640

To prohibit Federal agencies from planning the sale of the Southeastern 
                         Power Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 1995

  Mr. Gordon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal agencies from planning the sale of the Southeastern 
                         Power Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON STUDY.

    Neither the Department of Energy, the United States Army Corp of 
Engineers, the Department of the Interior, nor any other department, 
agency, or instrumentality of the United States may undertake any plan 
regarding, or commence negotiating, the sale of the Southeastern Power 
Administration, including the dams, lakes, locks, and reservoirs, or 
any other facilities used in connection with the generation of electric 
energy marketed by the Southeastern Power Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancorporation of Alabama Inc. for theperiod ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Allen O. Jones, Jr., Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:   (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    (2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.         Date: March 27, 2008  By:  /s/Allen O. Jones, Jr.    Allen O. Jones, Jr.    Senior Vice President and CFO(Principal Financial Officer)
#### SINGER, HUTNER, LEVINE & SEEMAN, Bernard E. Singer, Henry A. Singer, Joseph L. Hutner, Morton Levine, Jay W. Seeman, Walter B. Stuart IV, and Stephen I. Dwyer v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION.

No. 65471.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 31, 1979.

In re Singer, Hutner, Levine & Seeman, Bernard E. Singer, Henry A. Singer, Joseph *655L. Hutner, Morton Levine, Jay W. Seeman, Walter B. Stuart IV, and Stephen I. Dwyer, applying for injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment.

Writ granted.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTest Procedures for Characterizing, Evaluating, and Managing Separator Materials used in Secondary Alkaline BatteriesSecondary alkaline batteries, such as nickel-cadmium and silver-zinc, are commonly used for aerospace applications. The uniform evaluation and comparison of separator properties for these systems is dependent upon the measurement techniques. This manual presents a series of standard test procedures that can be used to evaluate, compare, and select separator materials for use in alkaline batteries. Detailed test procedures evaluating the following characteristics are included in this manual: physical measurements of thickness and area weight, dimensional stability measurements, electrolyte retention, resistivity, permeability as measured via bubble pressure, surface evaluation via SEM, chemical stability, and tensile strength.Document ID19970024869Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGuasp, Edwin*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Manzo, Michelle A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberE-10368NAS 1.55:107292NASA-TM-107292Accession Number97N24582Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 297-55-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970024869.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024