alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                This schecdule contains summary financial information
                extracted from form 10-Q for this period ended
                December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
                by reference to such form 10-Q.

</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996 
<CASH>                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0 
<INVENTORY>                                  0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                       0 
<DEPRECIATION>                               0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  105,362 
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0 
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 3,505 
<OTHER-SE>                                   0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 0
<SALES>                                      0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0 
<CGS>                                        0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        10,147  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (10,147) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (10,147) 
<DISCONTINUED>                               0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0 
<NET-INCOME>                           (10,147) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.00)


         

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. Orell MARSH et al.

No. 51791.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 30, 1980.

Wells, Downey & Wicker, John H. Dow-ney, Jackson, for appellant.

Riddick & Carpenter, Robert M. Carpenter, Jackson, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Dan M. Lee, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and COFER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10(b)

IFC's EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
      The Board of  Directors  of the  Company  adopted  an  unfunded  Executive
Deferred  Compensation plan which allowed officers and key employees selected by
a  Management  Committee  appointed  by the Board of  Directors to defer part of
their 1990  annual  salary.  The plan  allowed a one time  deferral  of up to 50
percent in 1990. The terms of the plan are the same as the IB plans described in
the previous  paragraph,  except the participant must be employed by the Company
or a subsidiary of the Company instead of IB only. The addition of similar plans
in the future is subject to election by the Board of Directors of the Company or
the subsidiaries and voluntary participation.
EXHIBIT 32.2



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q-SB, filed pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of
Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Connie Woods Hawkins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                              BY     /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins
                                 ____________________________________

                              Name:  Connie Woods Hawkins
                                     Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                     Date:  November 12, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital
Corporation and will be retained by Security Capital Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 592.302 Effective date. The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( a ) With respect to all provisions of this part except for § 592.301(a)(3), 12:01 a.m., eastern daylight time, July 30, 2003; and
( b ) With respect to § 592.301(a)(3), September 23, 2004.
#### KAR PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert L. ROBISON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12432.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Nov. 7, 1974.

*262James B. Wells, Bossier City, Dickerson, Bailey & Vela by Jack R. Bailey, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Hargrove, Guyton, Ramey & Barlow by Thomas J. Wyatt, Shreveport, Crowley, Barrett & Karaba by Frank A. Karaba, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AYRES, PRICE and HALL, JJ.

PRICE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 5, 1974, granting the plaintiff, KAR Products, Inc., a preliminary injunction against defendant, Robert L. Robison. Defendant secured an order for a devolu-tive appeal on April 29th (24 days after judgment) and filed his bond on May 13th (38 days after judgment). KAR has moved to dismiss this appeal as having been untimely filed. Code of Civil Procedure Article 3612 provides in part:

> “ * * * An appeal from an order or judgment relating to a preliminary injunction must be taken and a bond furnished within fifteen days from the date of the order or judgment.”

The defendant has obviously failed to comply. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal. See Ruiz v. Succession of Viosca, 291 So. 2d 527 (La.App.1974); In re Frickey, 287 So.2d 807 (La.App.1st Cir. 1973); Eason v. Sabine Parish School Board, 276 So.2d 367 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1973); May v. Jackson Brewing Co., Inc., 275 So.2d 201 (La. App.4th Cir. 1973); Yates v. Egan, 273 So.2d 538 (La.App.1st Cir. 1973); American Budget Plan, Inc. v. Landry, 187 So.2d 478 (La.App.4th Cir. 1966).

In opposition to the motion to dismiss, defendant refers us to Calhoun v. State, 152 So.2d 866 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1963), and Murry v. City of Oakdale, 276 So.2d 368 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1973), contending that the judgment rendered herein, although styled a preliminary injunction, granted plaintiff the entire relief requested in his prayer for a permanent injunction, therefore his appeal is controlled by Code of Civil Procedure Articles 2123 and 2087 rather than Article 3612. We find the cited cases are distinguishable in that the judgment rendered in those actions denied the requested preliminary injunction and dismissed the plaintiff’s entire suit.

We do not find the holding in *Calhoun*or *Murry*to have any applicability to the instant situation where the posture of this litigation will require a trial of the plaintiff’s demand for a permanent injunction. Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc., 234 So.2d 243 (La.App.2nd Cir. 1970); aff. 258 La. 311, 246 So.2d 183.

For the foregoing reasons the appeal is dismissed. Costs of this appeal are to be paid by appellant.
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

129 items

        -    TIAS  		Honduras (18-110) – Defense Extension to Agreement of January 25, 2008 Regarding Status of Forces	  January 10, 2018 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (15-219) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  February 19, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (14-307) – Agreement Regarding the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian Cultures and Ecclesiastical Ethnological Material from the Colonial Period of Honduras	  March 7, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (13-828) – Agreement of Millennium Challenge Compact	  August 28, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (13-728) – Memorandum of Agreement for Civil Aviation Concerning the Deployment of Air Marshals on Board Aircraft	  July 28, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (08-125) – Agreement Regarding the Status of United States Personnel Who May Be Temporarily Present in Honduras	  January 25, 2008 

previous page1…10111213next page

Back to Top
# C_2005201EN.01000101.xml

| 18.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2005

(2005/C 201/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2296 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3309 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5486 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,63 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9215 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9560 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5730 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,444 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0333 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5777 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,603 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6740 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6103 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4773 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5555 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7518 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0396 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9411 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9594 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3645 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 173,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,633 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,704 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,727 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2296

JPY

Japanese yen

134,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3309

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5486

ISK

Iceland króna

78,63

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9215

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9560

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5730

CZK

Czech koruna

29,444

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0333

RON

Romanian leu

3,5777

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,603

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6740

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6103

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4773

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5555

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7518

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0396

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,02

ZAR

South African rand

7,9411

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9594

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3645

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 173,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,633

PHP

Philippine peso

68,704

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0000

THB

Thai baht

50,727

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2671 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2671

To provide that the President and Members of Congress shall not be paid 
      during Federal Government shutdowns, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 1995

 Mr. Browder introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the 
     Committee on House Oversight, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the President and Members of Congress shall not be paid 
      during Federal Government shutdowns, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY OF THE PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DURING 
              GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS.

    Basic pay of the President and a Member of Congress may not be 
disbursed during any period in which--
            (1) there is a lapse in appropriations for any Federal 
        agency or department as a result of a failure to enact a 
        regular appropriations bill or continuing resolution; or
            (2) the Federal Government is unable to make payments or 
        meet obligations because the public debt limit under section 
        3101 of title 31, United States Code, has been reached.
                                 <all>
```
693 A.2d 200

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Durrell GRAHAM, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 13, 1997.

*22
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the issue of whether Superior Court properly affirmed the trial court’s denial of Petitioner’s suppression motion.
# C_2005205EN.01003601.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/36

---

Action brought on 30 June 2005 by the Hellenic Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-243/05)

(2005/C 205/64)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 June 2005 by the Hellenic Republic.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Commission's contested decision; or |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's contested decision; or

| — | Alter it in accordance with the specific matters set out in the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter it in accordance with the specific matters set out in the application;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas and main arguments

By its contested decision the Commission, effecting clearance of accounts under Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, excluded from Community financing various expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic in regard to arable crops, olive oil and financial control, with the result that those amounts were not recognised as lawful Community financing and were charged to the Hellenic Republic.

In support of its application, the applicant pleads that the Commission did not have competence to impose the corrections at issue inasmuch as they relate to expenditure effected by the Member State at a time prior to the 24 months before the Commission's initial notification in connection with that expenditure.

Moreover, as regards the 5 % financial correction effected in the sector of arable crops imposed by the contested decision on the ground that the competent Greek services, notwithstanding progress made by them continued to make payments even in circumstances where claims had demonstrably not been checked correctly, the applicant calls in question the factual circumstances relied on by the Commission and pleads an error as to the facts and erroneous reasoning in the contested decision. It further invokes infringement of the Commission's guidelines at VI/75330/97, breach of the principle of proportionality, misappraisal of the facts and incorrect justification in connection with the amount of the 5 % financial correction.

In regard to the correction in respect of financial control, the applicant pleads that the payment arrears in regard to which the corrections at issue were imposed are attributable either to the need to effectuate supplementary checks owing to the major discrepancy found in contrast to areas declared or to exceptional circumstances, namely the submission and examination of objections concerning erroneous entries detected in the database after payments had been made or, in one specific case, to a suspension of works owing to force majeure.

---
§ 570.512 Property of the Government of Libya, its agencies, instrumentalities, and controlled entities, and the Central Bank of Libya. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, as of December 16, 2011, all property and interests in property of the Government of Libya, its agencies, instrumentalities, and controlled entities, and the Central Bank of Libya blocked pursuant to § 570.201(a)(1) are unblocked.
( b ) All funds, including cash, securities, bank accounts, and investment accounts, and precious metals of the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) and entities owned or controlled by the LIA blocked pursuant to § 570.201(a)(1), as of September 19, 2011, remain blocked.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Billy Wayne SINCLAIR v. Mike CANNON, Clerk, 19th Judicial District Court; Johnny Johnston, Chief of Police, Baton Rouge City Police Dept.; Al Amiss, Sheriff, East Baton Rouge Parish; and Ossie Brown, D. A., East Baton Rouge Parish.

No. 67759.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Billy Wayne Sinclair applying for writs of certiorari and review. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 54,969.

Denied.

BLANCHE, J., recused.

WATSON, J., would transfer to the court of appeal.
§ 592.202 Evasions; attempts; conspiracies. ( a ) Notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to July 30, 2003, any transaction by a United States person anywhere, or any transaction that occurs in whole or in part within the United States, on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, or has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate, any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to July 30, 2003, any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions of this part is prohibited.
HomeBarbados

# Barbados

61 items

        -    Press Statement  		Venezuelan Supreme Court Rulings and the Barbados Agreement	  Matthew MillerJanuary 27, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Barbados National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Venezuela Negotiations	  October 17, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Venezuelans Return to Negotiations	  Matthew MillerOctober 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Barbados	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Barbados	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Barbados	  March 20, 2023 

123…7next page

Back to Top
#### § 136.340 Provision of continuing education allowances.

In order to encourage physicians, dentists and other health professionals to join or continue in the Service and to provide their services in the rural and remote areas where a significant portion of the Indian people reside, the Secretary, acting through the Service, may provide allowances to health professionals, employed in the Service in order to enable them to leave their duty stations for not to exceed 480 hours of professional consultation and refresher training courses in any one year.
# Nigeria

198 items

        -    Report  		Nigeria	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Nigeria	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Nigeria	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Nigeria	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Sub-Saharan Africa – Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Small Grants (Summary)	  August 7, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		Evaluation of the United States-Africa Clean Energy Finance Initiative (US-ACEF)	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		International Religious Freedom Program (Summary)	  March 25, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Nigeria (13-423) – Agreement on Mutual Assistance Between Customs Administrations	  April 23, 2013 
        -    		Daniel  Onateh	  June 11, 2009 
        -    DS Memorial  		Daniel Onateh	  June 11, 2009 

previous page1…17181920next page

Back to Top
# Malawi

60 items

        -    Report  		Malawi	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Addressing the Blind Spot in Achieving Epidemic Control in Malawi: Implementing “male-friendly” HIV services to increase access and uptake	  December 21, 2018 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		Evaluation of the Women in Science (WiSci) Girls STEAM Camp Public-Private Partnership [PDF]	  November 30, 2018 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Costa Rica (21-1021) – Agreement for the Sharing of Visa Information

# 									Costa Rica (21-1021) – Agreement for the Sharing of Visa Information							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 21, 2021

Consular Affairs: Visa, Immigration, and Nationality Information Exchange

Signed at San Jose October 21, 2021; entered into force October 21, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [9 MB]

Tags

Costa RicaImmigrationTreatiesVisas

Back to Top
#### George W. Martin, Respondent, *v.*Charles W. Tarbox, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Tenth District Court.

R. Crawford, for respondent.

S. E. Duffey, for appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment appealed from must he affirmed. The statute requires us to award costs where the judgment is affirmed. As both parties have appealed, it seems that while awarding costs against each, we should also provide that they be offset. Board of Supervisors v. Bristol, 58 How. Pr. 3. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs in favor of the respondent oñ each appeal. The order of affirmance should contain a provision for an offset of the costs. Board of Supervisors v. Bristol, 58 How. Pr. 3.

Present: Beexman, P. J., Gildebsleeve and Giegebich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.