alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeMexico

# Mexico

498 items

        -    TIAS  		Mexico (13158) – Minute 307 of the International Boundary Water Commission: Partial Coverage of Allocation of the Rio Grande Treaty Tributary Water Deficit from Fort Quitman to Falcon Dam	  March 16, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (01-125) – Agreement on Use of the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band	  January 25, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (01-117) – Treaty on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf in the Western Gulf of Mexico Beyond 200 Nautical Miles	  January 17, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (13157) – Boundary Waters Minute No. 306 Concerning Studies of the Ecology of the Colorado River and its Associated Delta	  January 9, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (13107) – Agreement to Establish a United States-Mexico Border Health Commission	  November 24, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (00-711) – Agreement on the Application of Competition Laws	  July 11, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (13103) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between their Customs Administrations	  June 20, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (00-119) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement of August 15, 1960, as Amended and Extended	  January 19, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (99-1230) – Protocol Amending Convention of February 7, 1936 Regarding the Protection of Migratory Birds and Game Mammals	  December 30, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (13014) – Protocol Concerning the Transmission and Reception of Signals from Satellites for the Provision of Mobile-Satellite Services and Associated Feeder Links in the US and Mexico	  December 21, 1998 

previous page1…4647484950next page

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

LUNAR REPRESENTATIVE, LLC, 

 

Plaintiff Below, Appellant, 

v. 

AMAG PHARMACEUTICALS, 

INC. 

Defendant Below, Appellee.

§ 

§ 

§ No. 227, 2023 

§ 

§ Court Below—Court of Chancery 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ C.A. No. 2019-0688 

§ 

§

 

Submitted: February 7, 2024 

 Decided: February 21, 2024 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW and

GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting Court en Banc. 

ORDER

 

 This 21st day of February 2024, after careful consideration of the parties’ 

briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in the Order and the Transcript Ruling dated May 26, 2023. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
# C_2005257EN.01001002.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/10

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 September 2005 — Hosman-Chevalier v Commission

(Case T-72/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Meaning of ‘work done for another State’)

(2005/C 257/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties:

Applicant(s): Sonja Hosman-Chevalier (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by J. R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, E. Wouters and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by J. Currall and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for:

annulment of the Commission's decision of 29 October 2003 refusing to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the allowances associated therewith

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decisions of 8 April and 29 October 2003 in so far as they refuse to grant the applicant payment of the expatriation allowance laid down in Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and payment of the installation allowance laid down in Article 5(1) of that same annex; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decisions of 8 April and 29 October 2003 in so far as they refuse to grant the applicant payment of the expatriation allowance laid down in Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and payment of the installation allowance laid down in Article 5(1) of that same annex;

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3) | Orders the Commission to bear all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Commission to bear all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
#### § 800.202 Anonymized data.

The term *anonymized data* means data from which all personal identifiers have been completely removed.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James M. REYNOLDS, Appellee.

No. 78-1355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 23, 1979.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Clear-water, and Gordon B. Scott, Asst. Public Defender, New Port Richey, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. See *State v. Allen et al.,*362 So.2d 10 (Fla.1978).

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Political-Military Affairs...Office of Security Assistance

# Office of Security Assistance

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Security Assistance (SA) has three core functions: (1) managing State Department Title 22 military grant assistance – to include directing over $6.5 billion annually in U.S. military grant assistance to allies and friends through policy development, budget formulation, and program oversight; (2) managing concurrence/coordination on various Department of Defense (DoD) Title 10 authorities, including joint planning and development of section 333; and (3) representing the State Department in, and coordinating foreign policy input into, DoD planning and posture initiatives. 				

Back to Top
#### James Alward SHURTZER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Robert CARRION and Betty Carrion, Appellants, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 78-2319.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 21, 1979.

Pelzner, Schwedock & Finkelstein and Peter S. Schwedock, Miami, for appellants.

High, Stack, Lazenby & Bender and Alan R. Dakan, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a summary final judgment in favor of the appellees in an action for personal injuries sustained as the result of a defective tire which was on the automobile in which appellants were riding. We find error and reverse on the authority of *West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.,*336 So.2d 80 (Fla.1976),

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
HomeSouth Sudan

# South Sudan

81 items

        -    TIAS  		South Sudan (12-911) – Agreement for Economic and Technical Cooperation	  September 11, 2012 

previous page1…789

Back to Top
# C_2005205EN.01000801.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch by order of that court of 31 May 2005 in G.M. van de Coevering v Rijksbelastingdienst

(Case C-242/05)

(2005/C 205/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch ('s-Hertogenbosch Regional Court of Appeal) of 31 May 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 June 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between G.M. van de Coevering and Roermond Customs District of the Rijksbelastingdienst on the following question:

Does Community law, in particular the freedom to provide services as set out in Articles 49 EC to 55 EC, preclude the Netherlands from charging a natural person resident in the Netherlands — who leases in another Member State, under a leasing contract with a lessor, a passenger car which is not registered in the register pursuant to the Wegenverkeerswet 1994 and on which no passenger car and motorcycle tax under Article 1(2) of the Wet BPM (1) has been paid — passenger car and motorcycle tax under Article 1(5) of the Wet BPM on commencement of use in the Netherlands by that passenger car of the highway within the meaning of the Wegenverkeerswet 1994, where the full amount of the tax is chargeable irrespective of the period of the lease and the duration of the use of the highway in the Netherlands and where that natural person has no right at all to an exemption or a refund?

1

---

(1)  1992 Law on passenger car and motorcycle tax.

1

---
# Suriname

58 items

        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Suriname	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Suriname National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 25, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Surinamese President Santokhi	  September 16, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Surinamese President Chandrikapersad Santokhi Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Suriname	  September 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Suriname	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Suriname	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Senior State Department Leadership Participate in International Partners Ministerial  Meeting on Haiti Hosted by the Government of Suriname	  July 12, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Suriname	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
# Pakistan

275 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Pakistani Foreign Minister Dar	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Uzra Zeya, Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights	  Uzra ZeyaMarch 20, 2024Asia Pacific Media Hub 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 19, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 18, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 6, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 6, 2024Washington, D.C. 

123…28next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





I, Richard
D. Crowley, Jr. of Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),
pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge
that:





(i)           the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 29,
2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
May 19,
2009                                                                           /s/ RICHARD D. CROWLEY,
JR.


Richard D. Crowley, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Exhibit 4(f)


 


Schedule A to Fee Waiver and Expense
Reimbursement Agreement

(as updated August 20, 2012)


Applicable Series of Managed Account
Series


 


Global
SmallCap Portfolio


Mid
Cap Value Opportunities Portfolio
|                               | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|                               | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|                               |   | By:    |                                                                                                                                                                | /s/      C. Neil Beer |   |   |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                | C.      Neil Beer |   |   |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                | Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|  Date: May      15, 2008 |   | By:    |                                                                                                                                                                | /s/      Edward C. Hall |   |   |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |  Edward C.      Hall |   |   |
|                               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                | Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |
# Tuvalu

30 items

        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  June 21, 2019 
        -    		Tuvalu	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Tuvalu	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Tuvalu (11-909) – Agreement Concerning Operational Cooperation to Suppress Illicit Transnational Maritime Activity	  September 9, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Tuvalu (03-203) – Agreement on the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  February 3, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Tuvalu (13167) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  October 26, 2001 

previous page123

Back to Top
HomeSlovenia

# Slovenia

71 items

        -    Press Statement  		NATO Accession Anniversaries for Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovakia, Slovenia	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Direct Line Event  		Emerging Technology Opportunities in Slovenia	  October 24, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Slovenia’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Slovenia	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 6, 2023	  Vedant PatelJune 6, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Slovenia	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Guiding Principles on Government Use of Surveillance Technologies	  March 30, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The Innovation Station Travels to Austria, Hungary, and Slovenia	  March 28, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### § 553.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
§ 800.245 Substantive decisionmaking. ( a ) The term *substantive decisionmaking* means the process through which decisions regarding significant matters affecting an entity are undertaken, including, as applicable: ( 1 ) Pricing, sales, and specific contracts, including the license, sale, or transfer of sensitive personal data to any third party, including pursuant to a customer, vendor, or joint venture agreement;
( 2 ) Supply arrangements;
( 3 ) Corporate strategy and business development;
( 4 ) Research and development, including location and budget allocation;
( 5 ) Manufacturing locations;
( 6 ) Access to critical technologies, covered investment critical infrastructure, material nonpublic technical information, or sensitive personal data, including pursuant to a customer, vendor, or joint venture agreement;
( 7 ) Physical and cyber security protocols, including the storage and protection of critical technologies, covered investment critical infrastructure, or sensitive personal data;
( 8 ) Practices, policies, and procedures governing the collection, use, or storage of sensitive personal data, including: ( i ) The establishment or maintenance of, or changes to, the architecture of information technology systems and networks used in collecting or maintaining sensitive personal data; or
( ii ) Privacy policies and agreements for individuals from whom sensitive personal data is collected setting forth parameters regarding whether and how sensitive personal data may be collected, maintained, accessed, or disseminated; or
( 9 ) Strategic partnerships.
( b ) The term *substantive decisionmaking* does not include strictly administrative decisions.
( c ) Examples: ( 1 ) *Example 1.* Corporation A, a foreign person that is not an excepted investor, proposes to acquire a four percent, non-controlling equity interest in Corporation B. Corporation B is an unaffiliated TID U.S. business that operates a container terminal at a strategic seaport within the National Port Readiness Network (Terminal B). Pursuant to the terms of the investment, Corporation A will have approval rights over which customers may utilize Terminal B. The proposed investment therefore affords Corporation A involvement in substantive decisionmaking of Corporation B regarding the management, operation, manufacture, or supply of covered investment critical infrastructure.
( 2 ) *Example 2.* Same facts as the example in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, except that instead of customer approval rights, Corporation A has the right to decide whether to claim certain tax credits with respect to Terminal B on its own income tax filing, which prevents Corporation B from claiming such credits. Assuming no other relevant facts, the proposed investment does not afford Corporation A involvement in substantive decisionmaking of Corporation B regarding the management, operation, manufacture, or supply of covered investment critical infrastructure.
§ 136.372 Application and selection. ( a ) An application for a pregraduate scholarship grant under this subdivision shall be submitted in such form and at such time as the Secretary may prescribe. However, an application must indicate: ( 1 ) The pregraduate program in which the applicant is or wishes to enter, and
( 2 ) Whether the applicant intends to provide health services to Indians upon completion of health professions education or training by serving as described in § 136.332 or otherwise as indicated on the application.
( b ) Within the limits of available funds, the Director, IHS, shall make pregraduate scholarship grant awards for a period not to exceed four academic years of an individual's pregraduate education to eligible applicants taking into consideration: ( 1 ) Academic performance;
( 2 ) Work experience;
( 3 ) Faculty or employer recommendation;
( 4 ) Stated reasons for asking for the scholarship; and
( 5 ) The relative needs of the IHS and Indian health organizations for persons in specific health professions.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0080) [49 FR 7381, Feb. 29, 1984. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002]
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
and




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the filing by Wincroft, Inc. (the "Company") of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I,
Xiaojin Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




August
      18, 2008
            /s/ Xiaojin Wang


Xiaojin
      Wang (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer)