alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3051

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further restrict certain activities

relating to biological weapons, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1996

Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. KASICH, and Mr. MARKEY)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further restrict

certain activities relating to biological weapons, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biological Weapons

5 Enhanced Penalties Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. ATTEMPTS TO ACQUIRE UNDER FALSE PRETENSES.

7 Section 175(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting ‘‘attempts to acquire under false

9 pretenses,’’ after ‘‘acquires,’’.
2

•HR 3051 IH

1 SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF RECOMBINANT MOLECULES.

2 Section 175 of title 18, United States Code, is

3 amended by inserting ‘‘recombinant molecules,’’ after

4 ‘‘toxin,’’ each place it appears.

5 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

6 Section 178 of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or naturally

9 occurring or bioengineered component of any such

10 microorganism, virus, or infectious substance,’’ after

11 ‘‘infectious substance’’;

12 (2) in paragraph (2)—

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘the toxic material of

14 plants, animals, microorganisms, viruses, fungi,

15 or infectious substances’’ after ‘‘means’’; and

16 (B) by inserting ‘‘, and includes’’ after

17 ‘‘production’’;

18 (3) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘or a mol19 ecule, including a recombinant molecule,’’ after ‘‘or20 ganism’’.

21 SEC. 5. THREATENING USE OF CERTAIN WEAPONS.

22 Section 2332a of title 18, United States Code, is

23 amended by inserting ‘‘, threatens,’’ after ‘‘uses, or’’.
3

•HR 3051 IH

1 SEC. 6. INCLUSION OF RECOMBINANT MOLECULES AND BI2 OLOGICAL ORGANISMS IN DEFINITION.

3 Section 2332a(b)(2)(C) of title 18, United States

4 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘disease organism’’ and in5 serting ‘‘biological agent or toxin, as those terms are de6 fined in section 178’’.

Æ
No. 99-8622.

#### Love *v.*Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office et al.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.1













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert K. Bench, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:






1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













Dated:
November 12,
2008                                                                  /s/  Robert K.
Bench


Robert K. Bench


Chief Executive Officer











This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 802.508 Completion or termination of investigation and report to the President. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the Committee shall complete an investigation no later than the forty-fifth day after the date the investigation commences, or, if the forty-fifth day is not a business day, no later than the next business day after the forty-fifth day.
( b ) Upon completion or termination of any investigation, the Committee shall send a report to the President requesting the President's decision if: ( 1 ) The Committee recommends that the President suspend or prohibit the transaction;
( 2 ) The Committee is unable to reach a decision on whether to recommend that the President suspend or prohibit the transaction; or
( 3 ) The Committee requests that the President make a determination with regard to the transaction.
( c ) In circumstances when the Committee sends a report to the President requesting the President's decision with respect to a covered real estate transaction, such report shall include information relevant to sections 721(d)(4)(A) and (B), and shall present the Committee's recommendation. If the Committee is unable to reach a decision to present a single recommendation to the President, the Chairperson of the Committee shall submit a report of the Committee to the President setting forth the differing views and presenting the issues for decision.
( d ) Upon completion or termination of an investigation, if the Committee determines to conclude all deliberative action under section 721 with regard to a notified covered real estate transaction without sending a report to the President, action under section 721 shall be concluded. An official at the Department of the Treasury shall promptly advise the parties to such a transaction in writing of a determination to conclude action.
( e ) In extraordinary circumstances, the Chairperson may, upon a written request signed by the head of a lead agency, extend an investigation for one 15-day period. A request to extend an investigation must describe, with particularity, the extraordinary circumstances that warrant the Chairperson extending the investigation. The authority of the head of a lead agency to request the extension of an investigation may not be delegated to any person other than the deputy head (or equivalent thereof) of the lead agency. If the Chairperson extends an investigation under this paragraph with respect to a covered real estate transaction, the Committee shall promptly notify the parties to the transaction of the extension.
( f ) For purposes of paragraph (e) of this section, the term *extraordinary circumstances* means circumstances for which extending an investigation is necessary and the appropriate course of action, in the Chairperson's discretion, due to a force majeure event or to protect the national security of the United States.
# Burkina Faso

74 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Burkina Faso	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Burkina Faso	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		Performance and Ex-Post Evaluation of Criminal Justice Training Program [PDF]	  March 27, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Burkina Faso	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Burkina Faso	  January 2, 2020 
        -    Report  		Burkina Faso	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burkina Faso	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Burkina Faso	  June 20, 2019 

previous page1…45678next page

Back to Top
# Philippines

191 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		United States to Co-Host the Sixth Indo-Pacific Business Forum	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Manila, Philippines: International School Manila: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Keynote Remarks at American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines Economic Briefing 2024	  Jose W. FernandezJanuary 30, 2024Manila, Phlippines 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Vietnam, the Philippines, and the Republic of Korea	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Manalo	  December 27, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea	  Matthew MillerDecember 10, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 5, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 5, 2023 

previous page12345…20next page

Back to Top
§ 137.259 What happens if the Secretary determines that the Self-Governance Tribe has not corrected the conditions that the Secretary identified in the notice? ( a ) The Secretary shall provide a second written notice by certified mail to the Self-Governance Tribe served by the compact or funding agreement that the compact or funding agreement will be rescinded, in whole or in part.
( b ) The second notice shall include: ( 1 ) The intended effective date of the reassumption;
( 2 ) The details and facts supporting the intended reassumption; and
( 3 ) Instructions that explain the Indian Tribe's right to a formal hearing within 30 days of receipt of the notice.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            TRANSCEND SERVICES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                                        
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                              SEPTEMBER 30               SEPTEMBER 30

                                            1996       1997             1996       1997
                                            ----       ----             ----       ----
<S>                                    <C>           <C>         <C>            <C>
LOSS BEFORE DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS    $(4,085,000)  $(487,000)   $(5,312,000)   $(1,015,000)
 
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS         (393,000)    (15,000)      (793,000)      (124,000)
                                       -----------   ---------    -----------    -----------
NET LOSS                               $(4,478,000)  $(502,000)   $(6,105,000)   $(1,139,000)
                                       ===========   =========    ===========    ===========
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
 OUTSTANDING                            19,570,000  20,422,000     19,128,000     20,219,000
                                        ==========  ==========     ==========     ==========
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE AND
  COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT
  Continuing Operations                     $(0.21)     $(0.02)        $(0.28)        $(0.05)
  Discontinued Operations                    (0.02)      (0.00)         (0.04)         (0.01)
                                            ------      ------         ------         ------
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE AND
  COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT                   $(0.23)     $(0.02)        $(0.32)        $(0.06)
                                            ======      ======         ======         ======
</TABLE>
#### § 124.602 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Act* means the Public Health Service Act, as amended.

*Facility* means the an entity that received assistance under title VI or title XVI of the Act and provided a community service assurance.

*Fiscal year* means facility's fiscal year.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his delegatee.

*Service area* means the geographic area designated as the area served by the facility in the most recent State plan approved by the Secretary under title VI, except that, at the request of the facility, the Secretary may designate a different area proposed by the facility when he determines that a different area is appropriate based on the criteria.

*State agency* means the agency of a state fully or conditionally designated by the Secretary as the State health planning and development agency of the State under section 1521 of the Act.

[44 FR 29379, May 18, 1979, as amended at 85 FR 72909, Nov. 16, 2020]
# Benin

68 items

        -    Report  		Benin	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Report  		Benin	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Benin	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Benin	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Benin	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Benin	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Benin	  August 15, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Benin (17-807) – Air Transport Agreement with Amendment	  August 7, 2017 
        -    Report  		Benin	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Benin	  June 27, 2017 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy  Releases

# U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy Releases

183 items

        -    Media Note  		U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  May 8, 2024 
        -    ACPD Special Report  		The Global Engagement Center: A Historical Overview  2001-2021	  April 30, 2024 
        -    		A Historical Overview of the Global Engagement Center:  ACPD Official Meeting Minutes	  February 26, 2024George Washington University’s Elliott School of International AffairsWashington, D.C. 
        -    		Celebrating 75 Years of ACPD Reporting: ACPD Official Meeting Minutes	  February 26, 2024George Washington University’s Elliott School of International AffairsWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  February 20, 2024 
        -    ACPD Special Report  		Reflections on the 75th Anniversary of the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  December 19, 2023 
        -    ACPD Annual Report  		2023 Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting	  December 19, 2023 
        -    		Public Diplomacy and DEIA Promotion: ACPD Official Meeting Minutes	  December 12, 2023USC Annenberg CenterWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  December 4, 2023 
        -    ACPD Special Report  		Public Diplomacy and DEIA Promotion: Telling America’s Story to the World (2023)	  November 21, 2023 

123…19next page

Back to Top
# C_2005205EN.01000502.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 30 June 2005

in Case C-30/05: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 1999/45/EC and 2001/60/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 205/10)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-30/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C.F. Durand and F. Simonetti) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 28 January 2005 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 June 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed periods, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations, and Commission Directive 2001/60/EC of 7 August 2001 adapting to technical progress Directive 1999/45, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed periods, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations, and Commission Directive 2001/60/EC of 7 August 2001 adapting to technical progress Directive 1999/45, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives.

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 02.04.2005.

1

---
EX-10.19(g)



 Exhibit 10.19(g) 

[LOGO] 
 June 6, 2009 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO GTA 6-13616 
 Frontier Airlines, Inc.

 Frontier Center One 
 7001 Tower Road 

Denver CO 80249-7312 
 CFM International, Inc.
(“CFM”) and Frontier Airlines, Inc. (“Airline”) have entered into General Terms Agreement No. 6-13616 dated June 30, 2000 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement contains applicable terms and
conditions governing the sale by CFM and the purchase by Airline from CFM of CFM56 series Engines, Modules and Optional Equipment in support of Airline’s acquisition of new aircraft. 

WHEREAS, CFM and Airline now desire to revise certain terms and conditions of the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, and other good and valuable
consideration. Receipt of which is acknowledged and agreed. 
 CFM and Airline agree as follows: 

 

	1.	 Revise GTA Exhibit B.1 “Definitions”, paragraph 20 “Ultimate Life”, as follows



 FROM: 

20. “Ultimate Life” of a Part means the approved limitation on use of a Part in cumulative Flight Hours or Flight Cycles, which
either CFMI or a U.S. and/or French Government authority establish as the maximum period of allowed operational time for such Parts in Airline service, with periodic repair and restoration. The term does not include individual Failure from wear and
tear or other cause not related to the total usage capability of all such Parts in Airline service.” 
 TO: 

“20. “Ultimate Life” of a Part means the approved limitation on use of a Part in cumulative Flight Hours or Flight Cycles, which
either CFMI or a U.S. and/or French Government authority establish as the maximum period of allowed operational time for such Parts in Airline service, with periodic repair and restoration. Ultimate Life for LLPs shall be used in the calculation of
CFM participation (if any, as solely determined by CFM) of an Engine or Part Failure, however, the term does not include individual Failure from wear and tear or other cause not related to the total usage capability of all such Parts in Airline
service.” 

  
 i 








 Except as noted here, the Agreement remains unchanged. Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by
signing the original and one (1) copy of this Amendment Number 1 to the Agreement in the space provided below. This Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts each of which, when taken together, will be deemed to be a single, enforceable
agreement between the parties. 
  

									
	FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.	 		 	CFM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
					
	By:	 	/s/ [Authorized Signatory]	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Thierry Derrien
					
	Printed Name:	 	[Authorized Signatory]	 		 	Printed Name:	 	Thierry Derrien
					
	Title:	 	[Authorized Signatory]	 		 	Title:	 	VP Contracts
					
	Date:	 		 		 	Date:	 	July 9, 2009


  
 ii
§ 8.33 Accuracy. Each attorney, certified public accountant, and enrolled practitioner shall exercise due diligence in: ( a ) Preparing or assisting in the preparation of, approving, and filing returns, documents, affidavits, and other papers relating to Bureau matters;
( b ) Determining the correctness of any representations made by him or her to the Bureau; and
( c ) Determining the correctness of any information which he or she imparts to a client with reference to any matter administered by the Bureau.
699 A.2d 731

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Shane MERCER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 29, 1996.

Decided Sept. 17, 1997.

*571Laurence Harmelin, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Stuart B. Suss, West Chester, for appellee.

Before FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, GAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

NIX, Former C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Joseph D’AGOSTINO, Relator, v. Honorable Dan SATIN, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-1105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6365

RICHARD GREGG DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. B. TAYLOR, Warden; BOBBY W. SOLES, Assistant Warden; BARBARA WHEELER, Head of Treatment; PEGGY SPICER; A. SMITH, Lieutenant,

Security Staff; J. LYTTLE, Sergeant, Security

Staff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-1150-2)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Gregg Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Taylor,

No. CA-95-1150-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 137.229 What happens if the Secretary neither approves or denies a waiver request within the time specified in § 137.227?

The waiver request is deemed approved.
No. 00-5922.

No. 00-5923.

#### Wright *v.*United States; and Wright *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F. 3d 233.