alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005204EN.01000301.xml

| 20.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3872 — United Services Group/Solvus)

(2005/C 204/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3872. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3872. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R . 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-21044 Summary Calendar

GARY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LYONDELL-CITGO REFINING COMPANY LIMITED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-1028)

May 25, 1999
Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Gary Williams appeals froma summary judgment

granted against him in his age-discrimination suit brought under

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq.

(“ADEA”).

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de

novo, applying the same standar d as did the district court. S ee2

Neff v. American Dairy Queen Corp.

, 58 F.3d 1063, 1065 (5th

Cir.1995). Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings,

d epositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,

together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine

issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled

to judgment as a matter of law. F E D .R.C IV .P. 56(c). A “dispute

about a material fact is 'genuine’ if the evidence is such that a

reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.”

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

, 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). For

purposes of summary judgment determination, all fact questions are

viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. S ee Hassan v.

Lubbock I.S.D. , 55 F.3d 1075, 1078 (5th Cir.1995).

After viewing the evidence before us in the light most

favorable to Williams, we hold that no reasonable jury could

properly return a verdict in his favor. As appellee has correctly

pointed out, the record is simply devoid of evidence from which a

r easonable fact finder could infer that Williams’ age actually

played a role in and was a determining factor in his termination.

S ee generally Little v. Republic Ref. Co., Ltd. , 924 F.2d 93, 98

(5th Cir.1991). In light of this and the overwhelming evidence that

Williams was fired for the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons

articulated by appellee, we AFFIRM.
#### § 802.213 Entity.

The term *entity* means any branch, partnership, group or sub-group, association, estate, trust, corporation or division of a corporation, or organization (whether or not organized under the laws of any State or foreign state); assets (whether or not organized as a separate legal entity) operated by any one of the foregoing as a business undertaking in a particular location or for particular products or services; and any government (including a foreign national or subnational government, the U.S. Government, a subnational government within the United States, and any of their respective departments, agencies, or instrumentalities).
HomeKazakhstan

# Kazakhstan

137 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and India	  February 24, 2023Via TeleconferenceWashington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and India	  February 23, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the United States-Kazakhstan High-Level Dialogue on Human Rights and Democratic Reforms	  January 24, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Kazakhstani Special Presidential Representative Kazykhan	  January 23, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the United States-Kazakhstan Enhanced Strategic Partnership Dialogue	  December 6, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kazakhstani Foreign Minister Tileuberdi	  November 28, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Presidential Election in Kazakhstan	  Ned PriceNovember 22, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Zero-Tolerance for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse:  U.S. and India Conduct National Investigation Officer ‘Training of Trainers’ Course 	  November 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Lu Travels to Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan	  November 6, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Kazakhstan’s Republic Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 24, 2022 

previous page1…34567…14next page

Back to Top
§ 570.401 Reference to amended sections. ( a ) Reference to any section in this part is a reference to the same as currently amended, unless the reference includes a specific date. *See* 44 U.S.C. 1510.
( b ) Reference to any ruling, order, instruction, direction, or license issued pursuant to this part is a reference to the same as currently amended unless otherwise so specified.
#### Anthony DeLuca, complainant, *v.*Leonardo Ventura and A. Engle Haines, defendants.

[Decided October 14th, 1929.]

*Messrs. Worth é*Worth, for the complainant.

*Mr. Daniel Liehtenthal,*for the defendant Ventura.

Leaming, V. C.

Complainant seeks to set aside and have declared void a deed of conveyance of land which is alleged to have been made to complainant without his knowledge or consent. The necessity for this relief arises from the circumstance that complainant holds a mortgage against the land and a judgment now exists against the mortgagor which has been entered subsequent to the execution of complainant’s mortgage. The bill charges that the judgment creditor now claims that his judgment lien is superior to the lien of complainant’s mortgage and is now proceeding to an execution sale of the land under that claim. It is to protect complainant against a claim of the judgment creditor of the mortgagor that the deed of conveyance was operative as a merger of the mortgage that the bill primarily is filed.

*289Obviously the deed of conveyance is void and of no effect, if it be true, as alleged, that it was made by the mortgagor to the mortgagee without the knowledge or consent of the latter; and the evidence now presented may be said to fully establish that fact. While the bill appropriately is filed to set aside that conveyance, the inquiry arises whether complainant is entitled *pendente lite*to restrain the judgment ..creditor of the mortgagor from making sale of the mortgaged premises under the judgment.

The view frequently has been adopted that because a sale under a judgment which is not a lien will confer no title, it cannot be said to cloud the title of the real owner, and accordingly a court of equity should leave such situations to be settled a law. But the situation here presented does not fall within that class of cases. Complainant, as mortgagee, is not owner of the legal title and enjoys no legal remedy against a purchaser at the proposed execution sale. Moreover, the inherent *quia timet*jurisdiction of the court of equity is almost uniformly sustained, even when only legal titles are involved, in cases in which extrinsic evidence is necessary to repel a claim which on its face is *prima facie*valid or superior in right, as distinguished from claims irregular or void on their face. *2 Story Eq. Jur.*§§ 700, *700a; Pom. Eq. Jur.*§ *1399; 2 Freem. Exec.*§ *438; Murphy*v. Wilmington, *6 Houst. Del. 108; 5 R. C. L. 662.*And such protection will be afforded a mortgagee. *Drew, Trustee,*v. Drew, *27 N. J. Eq. 442; Miller*v. Cook, *135 Ill. 190.*In this view it seems clear that restraint should go.

I am unable to adopt the view urged by defendant judgment creditor that complainant’s conduct has denied him the preventive remedy here sought. He was under no obligation to protect the judgment creditor.

The restraint imposed by the order to show cause will be retained *pendente lite.*
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darrell
H. Hughes, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Darrell H. Hughes
Darrell H. Hughes
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 15, 2003
```
#### INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Appellant, v. BILL BRANCH CHEVROLET, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-1075.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 24, 1974.

Judgment quashed and case remanded.
HomeGhana

# Ghana

111 items

        -    DipNote  		Countering the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  February 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Marrakesh Co-Chairs’ Summary	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Commitments to Africa	  January 29, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Commitments at the 2023 Accra Peacekeeping Ministerial	  December 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Ghana	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Accra, Ghana: Lincoln Community School Accra: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Year One:  Building a Sustained Dialogue on Peaceful Uses for the NPT and a Brighter Future	  September 29, 2023 

previous page1234…12next page

Back to Top
698 A.2d 589

#### Kevin T. HALL, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted March 10, 1997.

Decided Aug. 21, 1997.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21th day of August, 1997, it is hereby ordered that Appellee’s Motion To Strike Appellant’s Reply Brief in the above-captioned appeal is granted. Furthermore, with the agreement and consent of all parties, the Order of the Commonwealth Court, entered December 13,1995, is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review for further evidentiary hearing proceedings, so that Appellant may have the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses against him regarding the relationship, if any, between an incident occurring at his former workplace on March 8, 1993, which forms the basis for his Workmen’s Compensation claim against his employer, and his employer’s decision to terminate his employment. *See Steinhouse v. Herman Miller, Inc., 443*Pa.Super. 395, 661 A.2d 1379 (1995)(purpose of cross-examination is to elicit testimony tending to refute all inferences and deductions raised by direct *523examination). It is further ordered that upon the completion of these proceedings, the UCBR shall issue a new decision based upon the amended record.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

CASTILLE, J., dissents.
# Mauritius

49 items

        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mauritius	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Passing of Sir Anerood Jugnauth	  Ned PriceJune 6, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mauritius	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: 	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Mauritius National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Mauritius	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Mauritius	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mauritania	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mauritius	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mauritius	  March 11, 2020 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
§ 560.324 Iranian financial institution. The term *Iranian financial* *institution* means any entity (including foreign branches), wherever located, organized under the laws of Iran or any jurisdiction within Iran, or owned or controlled by the Government of Iran, or in Iran, or owned or controlled by any of the foregoing, that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money service businesses, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and holding companies, affiliates, or subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. Note 1 to § 560.324 :
The names of persons that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has identified as meeting this definition are published in the Federal Register and incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) with the identifier “[IRAN].” The SDN List is accessible through the following page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/sdn .* However, the property and interests in property of any persons meeting the definition of the term *Iranian financial institution* are blocked pursuant to § 560.211 regardless of whether the names of such persons are published in the Federal Register or incorporated into the SDN List.
Note 2 to § 560.324 :
Section 501.807 of this chapter describes the procedures to be followed by persons seeking administrative reconsideration of OFAC's determination that they fall within the definition of the term *Iranian financial institution.*
[77 FR 64666, Oct. 22, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 3332, Jan. 21, 2016; 83 FR 55271, Nov. 5, 2018]
# Monaco

29 items

        -    Press Statement  		Monaco National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 19, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Monaco	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Monaco	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Monaco’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: France and Monaco	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Monaco	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Monaco	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to Monaco, France, and Qatar 	  March 17, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Monaco National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 19, 2021 

123next page

Back to Top
HomeEl Salvador

# El Salvador

132 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		San Salvador, El Salvador: Escuela Americana: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with President-elect Nayib Bukele of El Salvador	  February 8, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Congratulations to El Salvador’s President-Elect Nayib Bukele	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 5, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance  		Welcome Corps:  First Year of Refugee Private Sponsorship a Big Success	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		New Listings Under the Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report	  Matthew MillerDecember 21, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Nichols’ Travel to Guatemala and El Salvador	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		San Salvador, El Salvador: Escuela Americana: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 23, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		El Salvador National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With El Salvador	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with El Salvador’s Foreign Minister Hill	  August 7, 2023 

123…14next page

Back to Top
HomeTunisia

# Tunisia

101 items

        -    TIAS  		Tunisia (93-207) – Treaty Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment	  February 7, 1993 

previous page1…91011

Back to Top
HomeMongolia

# Mongolia

88 items

        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia and Tokyo, Japan	  February 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Strengthening U.S. Open Skies Civil Aviation Partnerships	  January 24, 2023 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Signed Memorandum of Consultation and Initialed Air Transport Agreement Between the U.S. and Mongolia of January 24, 2023	  January 24, 2023 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY22 IRF: Promoting Inclusive Societies in Mongolia	  January 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Mongolia Convene Second Child Protection Compact (CPC) Partnership Bilateral Dialogue	  December 16, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Zero-Tolerance for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse:  U.S. and India Conduct National Investigation Officer ‘Training of Trainers’ Course 	  November 8, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Indonesia:  Peacekeeping Exercise Garuda Canti Dharma II Helps Partners Develop Critical Capabilities	  October 18, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Mongolia-United States Strategic Partnership	  August 25, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		East Asian and Pacific Affairs Assistant Secretary Daniel J. Kritenbrink’s Travel to Ulaanbaatar and Seoul	  August 19, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Mongolia	  July 28, 2022 

previous page123456…9next page

Back to Top
#### Kenneth WALTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-955.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 31, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*227Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NA-' THAN, *JJ.*

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of murder in the second degree. The proof of guilt is clear and convincing of killing in the process of an attempted robbery. On this appeal, appellant urges that he is entitled to a new trial because of the trial judge’s failure to declare a mistrial when the evidence revealed a similar crime the night before.

We hold that the evidence was clearly admissible under the test set by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The evidence was relevant because it did show motive, knowledge and common scheme.

Affirmed.
- Office Home
- About Us

HomeOffice of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region...About Us – Office of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region

# 									About Us							

Office of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region

The Office of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region leads and coordinates the advancement of U.S. interests in the Arctic related to safety and security, sustainable economic growth, and strengthening cooperation among Arctic States to perpetuate and defend the rules-based order in the region.  The Office advises the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary on all Arctic matters and leads the Department’s participation in National Security Council and interagency activities, ensuring full representation of the Department’s various lines of effort. The Office represents and advocates for U.S. Arctic interests with foreign governments and in multilateral fora. The Office works across the federal government and with the U.S. Congress, state and local government, non-governmental organizations, academic institutions, the private sector, and local communities to advance shared goals in the Arctic and maintain U.S. leadership in the region toward a safe, secure, and prosperous future for all Arctic peoples.

Back to Top