alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005155EN.01001501.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 April 2005

in Case T-164/03 Ampafrance SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative trade mark comprising the word element ‘monBeBé’ - Earlier word marks bebe - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 155/29)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-164/03: Ampafrance SA, established in Cholet (France), represented by C. Bercial Arias, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. Rassat and A. Folliard-Monguiral), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Johnson and Johnson GmbH, established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by D. von Schultz, lawyer — action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2003 (Case R 220/2002-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Ampafrance SA and Johnson & Johnson GmbH — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; J. Plingers Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 2.08.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Realty Income Partnership
I, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William B. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Dean
Witter Realty Income Properties I Inc., the Managing General Partner of the
Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.


/s/ William B. Smith
--------------------
William B. Smith
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Dean Witter Realty Income Properties I, Inc., as
Managing General Partner of Dean Witter Realty Income
Partnership I, L.P.


Date: September 13, 2002
§ 579.512 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates for personal, non-commercial use. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities are: ( i ) Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* For the purposes of this section, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* For the purposes of this section, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 579.512 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78499, Dec. 21, 2022]
| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY                /s/                Frank West |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                Frank West                 |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer   |
|   |  Date:                August 11, 2006      |
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg by judgment of that court of 1 June 2005 in Administration de l'Enregistrement et des Domaines v EURODENTAL SARL

(Case C-240/05)

(2005/C 193/29)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Cour d'appel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg of 1 June 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 June 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Administration de l'Enregistrement et des Domaines and EURODENTAL SARL on the following questions:

----

(1)  OJ L 145, p. 1.

----
§ 1003.1560 Notice to other agencies. ( a ) Whenever a penalty, an assessment, or an exclusion becomes final, the following organizations and entities will be notified about such action and the reasons for it: The appropriate State or local medical or professional association; the appropriate quality improvement organization; as appropriate, the State agency that administers each State health care program; the appropriate Medicare carrier or intermediary; the appropriate State or local licensing agency or organization (including the Medicare and Medicaid State survey agencies); and the long-term-care ombudsman. In cases involving exclusions, notice will also be given to the public of the exclusion and its effective date.
( b ) When the OIG proposes to exclude a nursing facility under this part, the OIG will, at the same time the facility is notified, notify the appropriate State licensing authority, the State Office of Aging, the long-term-care ombudsman, and the State Medicaid agency of the OIG's intention to exclude the facility.
HomePeru

# Peru

179 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Solicitation for Democracy Strengthening in Peru	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		APEC Senior Official Murray’s Participation in Senior Official Meetings in Lima, Peru	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Lima, Peru: Colegio Franklin Delano Roosevelt ~ The American School of Lima: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Peru Meet to Discuss Trade Promotion Agreement Environment Chapter and Environmental Cooperation Agreement Implementation	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Ecuador, Peru, and Paraguay	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Robinson Travels to Peru and Ecuador	  February 5, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Strengthening Climate Security Through Enhanced Security Sector Governance	  December 20, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Senior Official for APEC Ambassador Matt Murray to Attend APEC Informal Senior Officials’ Meeting in Peru	  December 1, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Peru	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1234…18next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulations to Department of State Employee Ian Brownlee For Being Named as 2021 Service to America Finalist

# 									Congratulations to Department of State Employee Ian Brownlee For Being Named as 2021 Service to America Finalist							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 3, 2021

The State Department is pleased to announce that Mr. Ian Brownlee, the Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs, and the multi-agency team he led, have been named as one of the finalists for the 2021 Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals (Sammies) for their efforts in repatriating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens stranded in countries around the world when borders were closed and airports shut down because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In early 2020, the Department of State rose to meet the historic challenge posed by coronavirus all over the world. The U.S. government has no higher priority than the protection of U.S. citizens, and Mr. Brownlee and his team demonstrated the spirit of public service by working round-the-clock to help U.S. citizens return home.

The Sammies are the premier awards program recognizing America’s best in government, sponsored by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Partnership for Public Service. This year, the Partnership is adding a COVID-19 Response medal to recognize the extraordinary federal workers who played a leading role in responding to the pandemic and saving lives.

On Wednesday, May 5, at 12:30 p.m. EDT, the Partnership and Axios will air a virtual event to recognize the 2021 Service to America Medal finalists. All 29 finalists are also eligible for the Service to America Medals People’s Choice Award. Members of the public can vote online for the federal employee they believe has made the most significant contributions in public service. The People’s Choice winner will be announced in the summer.

The Partnership will recognize the seven recipients of 2021 Service to America Medals, including the Federal Employee of the Year, this fall.

For more information, see the Service to America Medals’ website.

For press inquiries or to request an interview with Acting Assistant Secretary Brownlee on his being named as a Sammies finalist, please contact CAPRESSREQUESTS@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsCOVID-19Global HealthOffice of the SpokespersonPartnerships

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2689 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2689

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301 West Main 
  Street in Benton, Illinois, as the ``James L. Foreman United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Courthouse located at 301 West Main Street in 
Benton, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``James L. 
Foreman United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James L. Foreman United 
States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### ACOSTA ROOFING COMPANY and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants, v. Gussie GILLYARD, Appellee.

No. ZZ-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 24, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1981.

*1322Summers Warden, Miami, for appellants.

Jay M. Levy of Silver, Levy & Hershoff, and R. Cory Schnepper of Ser, DeCardenas, Levine, Busch & Allen, P. A., Miami, for appellee.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

The only colorable issue raised by the employer/carrier’s appeal in this workers’ compensation case is whether we should reverse the deputy’s award of temporary total disability benefits during the period between the date of the industrial accident, October 2, 1979, and April 15, 1980, the declared date of maximum medical improvement. The deputy is said to have erred in fixing the latter date by inadvertently inserting in his order the date of the treating physician’s written medical report, rather than the date of the last medical examination to which the report related, namely, February 29, 1980. This error might readily have been corrected by application to the deputy during the 20 day period before it became final. Section 440.-25(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). Claimant concedes the error now and we will not suppose he would have resisted its correction at that earlier, more appropriate time. We therefore treat the error as inconsequential in order to discourage substantially groundless and unnecessary appeals to this court which serve to delay payment of benefits and unjustifiably tax the limited resources of the judicial system.

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fee is GRANTED in the amount of $1,500.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
HomePoland

# Poland

184 items

        -    TIAS  		Poland (23-615) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Poland	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Concerns Over Potential use of New Polish Legislation to Target Opposition	  Matthew MillerMay 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Poland	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources Verma’s Travel to Poland, Moldova, and Romania	  May 14, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Poland’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 3, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 21, 2023	  Vedant PatelMarch 21, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Poland	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		2023 International Women of Courage Award Recipients Announced	  March 6, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		New Initiative for Global Impact through the International Visitor Leadership Program	  February 8, 2023 

previous page1…34567…19next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20450]



[[Page 43166]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,584]


T.B.C Timber, Inc., Libby, MT; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 26, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of T.B.C. Timber, 
Inc., Libby, Montana.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification (TA-W-70,686) which expires on August 5, 2011. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of August 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-20450 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Arthur R. WELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-421.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 18, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Mary Sue Donsky, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Phillip D. Havens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dayto-na Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from judgments and sentences for burglary of a structure, grand theft and molesting a vending machine. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On June 25, 1980 this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment and sentence is hereby AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

1

. *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
#### Anne Marie KITCHENS, Appellant, v. John L. KITCHENS, Appellee.

No. 74-1240.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 17, 1974.

Rehearing- Denied Jan. 14, 1975.

Myers, Kaplan, Levinson & Kenin and Louis X. Amato, Miami, for appellant.

Edward C. Vining, Jr., and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

NATHAN, Judge.

The wife, petitioner in the circuit court, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage; an order upon custody, support and alimony, possession of the marital domicile and attorney fees and costs; and an order denying motion for rehearing and new trial.

 The wife presents four points on appeal, but only one is deemed to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant discussion. The thrust of this point is that the court erred in awarding custody of the children to the husband without making inquiry of the children as to their own preferences. The record reflects that the wife did not call any of the children as witnesses or request that the court hold an in camera hearing with the children to determine their preferences. The record further reflects that sufficient evidence was presented before the chancellor to support granting custody of the children to the father. The case law in this jurisdiction indicates that the child’s preference may be considered by the court as a factor in the determination of the custody issue,1 but there *250is no authority to support the proposition that it is the controlling factor of the court’s decision, nor that it is even required to be considered.

The remaining points on appeal raised by the wife relate to the award of use and possession of the marital home to the husband; disposition of funds upon sale of the home at some future time; and insufficiency of amount of rehabilitative alimony. We have considered these issues and find them to be without merit.

For the reasons stated, the orders appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. See Nixon v. Nixon, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 878; Bruggisser v. Bruggisser, Fla.App.1970, 244 So.2d 518.
HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Bureau of Political Military Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Releases

338 items

        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Using Social Media To Protect Civilians from Landmines and Other Explosive Hazards	  March 1, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Facilitating Security Cooperation with the Democratic Republic of the Congo	  February 21, 2021 
        -    		Mira K. Resnick	  January 21, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Arms Transfers Increased by 2.8 Percent in FY 2020 to $175.08 Billion	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation With Japan	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		End-Use Monitoring of U.S.-Origin Defense Articles	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Major Non-NATO Ally Status	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Security Cooperation With India	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Arms Sales and Defense Trade	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The Role of the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs in U.S. Security Sector Assistance	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1…2829303132…34next page

Back to Top
# Lebanon

238 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 4, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 4, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 20, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 20, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Séjourné	  February 17, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 14, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 14, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 8, 2024	  Vedant PatelFebruary 8, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs	  Barbara A. LeafFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 18, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 8, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 6, 2024Crete, Greece 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 

123…24next page

Back to Top