alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 560.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, including part 535 of this chapter, “Iranian Assets Control Regulations,” part 561 of this chapter, “Iranian Financial Sanctions Regulations,” and part 562 of this chapter, “Iranian Human Rights Abuses Sanctions Regulations,” with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
#### § 585.508 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.
HomeBangladesh

# Bangladesh

209 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		Bangladesh/The Anti-Terrorism Assistance Program [Archive]	  August 1, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (06-807) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  August 7, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (04-329) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  March 29, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (03-526) – Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation	  May 26, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (00-1004) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  October 4, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (98-914) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Air Search and Rescue Operations	  September 14, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (12954) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  May 19, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (91-520) – Memorandum of Understanding to Specify the Legal Status of the United States Pacific Command Disaster Relief Task Force	  May 20, 1991 
        -    TIAS  		Bangladesh (89-725) – Treaty on Protection of Investment	  July 25, 1989 

previous page1…192021

Back to Top
HomeComoros

# Comoros

43 items

        -    TIAS  		Comoros (14-905) – Agreement Concerning the Program of the Peace Corps in Comoros	  September 5, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Comoros (08-1208) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  December 8, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Comoros (04-0630) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  June 30, 2004 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
# Angola

92 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Angola	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Luanda, Angola: Luanda International School: 2022-2023 Special Needs Profile	  May 4, 2023 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		Signed Memorandum of Consultations and Initialed Air Transport Agreement Between the U.S. and Angola of April 26, 2023	  April 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Angola	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Promoting the Rule of Law in Angola	  March 17, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Minerals Security Partnership Governments Engage with African Countries and Issue a Statement on Principles for Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards	  February 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 23, 2023	  Ned PriceJanuary 23, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Angolan President Lourenço	  January 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan Foreign Minister Antonio	  December 15, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken and Secretary Austin’s Meeting with Angolan President Lourenço	  December 13, 2022 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
§ 1007.9 Relationship and agreement between Unit and Medicaid agency. ( a ) The Unit must be separate and distinct from the Medicaid agency.
( b ) No official of the Medicaid agency will have authority to review the activities of the Unit or to review or overrule the referral of a suspected criminal violation to an appropriate prosecuting authority.
( c ) The Unit will not receive funds paid under this part either from or through the Medicaid agency.
( d ) The Unit must enter into a written agreement with the Medicaid agency under which: ( 1 ) The Medicaid agency will agree to comply with all requirements of § 455.21(a) of this title;
( 2 ) The Unit will agree to comply with the requirements of § 1007.11(c) of this title; and
( 3 ) The Medicaid agency and the Unit will agree to: ( i ) Establish a practice of regular meetings or communication between the two entities;
( ii ) Establish procedures for how they will coordinate their efforts;
( iii ) Establish procedures for §§ 1007.9(e) through 1007.9(h) of this title;
( iv ) Establish procedures by which the Unit will receive referrals of potential fraud from managed care organizations, if applicable, either directly or through the Medicaid agency, as required at § 438.608(a)(7) of this title; and
( v ) Review and, as necessary, update the agreement no less frequently than every five (5) years to ensure that the agreement reflects current law and practice.
( e ) ( 1 ) The Unit may refer any provider with respect to which there is pending an investigation of a credible allegation of fraud under the Medicaid program to the Medicaid agency for payment suspension in whole or part under § 455.23 of this title.
( 2 ) Referrals may be brief but must be in writing and include sufficient information to allow the Medicaid agency to identify the provider and to explain the credible allegations forming the grounds for the payment suspension.
( f ) Any request by the Unit to the Medicaid agency to delay notification to the provider of a payment suspension under § 455.23 of this title must be made promptly in writing.
( g ) The Unit should reach a decision on whether to accept a case referred by the Medicaid agency in a timely fashion. When the Unit accepts or declines a case referred by the Medicaid agency, the Unit promptly notifies the Medicaid agency in writing of the acceptance or declination of the case.
( h ) Upon request from the Medicaid agency on a quarterly basis under § 455.23(d)(3)(ii), the Unit will certify that any matter accepted on the basis of a referral continues to be under investigation, thus warranting continuation of the payment suspension.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. QF09-524-000]


Motiva Enterprises LLC; Notice of Filing of Notice of Self-
Certification of Qualifying Status of a Cogeneration Facility

August 18, 2009.
    Take notice that on August 10, 2009, Motiva Enterprises LLC 
(Applicant), located at P.O. Box 2463, Houston, TX 77252-2463, filed 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a notice of self-
certification of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility 
pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(a) of the Commission's regulations.
    The applicant is constructing a cogeneration facility (Facility) at 
the site of its existing Port Arthur Refinery, located at 2555 Savannah 
Avenue, Port Arthur, TX 77640, to provide steam and electric energy 
primarily to meet the requirements of its Port Arthur Refinery--Crude 
Expansion Project and in part to meet the requirements of its existing 
Port Arthur Refinery. The Facility consist of four gas turbine 
generators, with four heat recovery generators, with a combined net 
electric capacity of 156 MW. The primary fuel for the Facility will be 
natural gas.
    Entergy Texas Inc. is the electric utility to which the Facility 
will interconnect. Generation is used primarily to meet on-site demand 
of the Port Arthur Refinery--Crude Expansion Project; however, any 
surplus could be sold in the available power markets.
    A notice of self-certification does not institute a proceeding 
regarding qualifying facility status; a notice of self-certification 
provides notice that the entity making the filing has determined the 
Facility meets the applicable criteria to be a qualifying facility. Any 
person seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so 
by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii).
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ed8dbccddd1f0f2f7f0fbcdebeeeef1eceadef8fbecfdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8acccfd8c9c5e4e6e3e4efd9fffafae5f8fecaeceff8e9a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20370 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### OPINION OF THE CLERK.

Opinion No. 31.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 21, 1980.

SENTELL, Clerk.

RULE 7, ALABAMA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION-FEES FOR MISCELLANEOUS FILINGS

Mr. Allen L. Tapley, Administrative Director of Courts, has submitted to me, pursuant to § 12-2-19(d), Code 1975, the following questions:

> (1) Is the taking of a *deposition*in this state, pursuant to Rule 28(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, to be used in a civil proceeding in another state, an original *filing*under Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration?

> (2) Is the $2.00 witness subpoena fee established in § 12-19-74(a), Code of Alabama 1975, incorporated by the provisions of Rule 28, supra, and thus to be charged of a party *desiring*to take the deposition of a witness in this state for use in a proceeding in another state?

My answer to the first question is in the negative. The second question is not answered.

*1156Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, is as follows:

> “FEES FOR MISCELLANEOUS FILINGS

> Any filing for which there is no express cost under the consolidated fee structure shall be treated as an original filing for cost purposes.”

Rule 28(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, reads:

> (b) Depositions to be Used Outside This State. A person desiring to take depositions in this state to be used in proceedings pending in the courts of any other state or country may produce to a judge of the circuit where the witness resides a commission authorizing the taking of such depositions or proof of notice duly served, whereupon it shall be the duty of the judge to issue, pursuant to Rule 45, the necessary subpoenas. Orders of the character provided in Rules 30(d), 37(a)(1), 37(b)(1) and 45(b) may be made upon proper application therefor by the person to whom such a subpoena is directed. Failure by any person without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena served upon him pursuant to this rule may be deemed a contempt of the court from which the subpoena issued.

The words, “original filing,” in Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, mean the “filing of a case.” *Opinion of the Clerk,*No. 23, March 10, 1980, 381 So.2d 55.

A case, within the context of the stated facts, is a judicial proceeding for the determination of a controversy between parties where rights are enforced or wrongs prevented or redressed. *Opinions of the Clerk,*No. 1, April 26, 1977, 345 So.2d 1329; No. 12, August 8, 1978, 361 So.2d 534.

The taking of a deposition in this state, pursuant to Rule 28(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, to be used in a civil proceeding in another state is not the filing of a case. It is, therefore, not an original filing under Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration.

The Clerk is not authorized by § 12-2-19(d) to give his opinion in the interpretation of a statute. The second question is not answered.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Dennis SHEPHERD v. P. Raymond LAMONICA, Judge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

No. 65730.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Dennis Shepherd, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge. Number unknown.

Denied. Moot.
HomeMexico

# Mexico

495 items

        -    TIAS  		Mexico (97-1113) – Treaty on Maritime Boundaries	  November 13, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (12891) – Memorandum of Cooperation for the Promotion and Development of Civil Aviation	  October 16, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (12838) – Protocol Concerning Use of the 929 – 930 MHz and 931 – 931 MHz Bands for Paging Services Along the Common Border	  February 27, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (12814) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  November 15, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (96-1111) – Protocol for the Provision of Direct-To-Home Satellite Services	  November 11, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (96-1106) – Agreement Concerning the Provision of Satellite Services	  November 6, 1996 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (95-1026) – Additional Protocol to Convention of September 18, 1992 for Taxation	  October 26, 1995 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (94-816) – International Boundary and Water Commission Minute No. 291	  August 16, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (94-308) – Telecommunication Services Use of the 17.7-17.8 GHz Frequency Band	  March 8, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (93-1228) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 28, 1993 

previous page1…47484950next page

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN CARL BUTTOLPH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 380 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 289 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 289

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository 
                             institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository 
                             institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Savings and Loan Asset Recovery 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS INVOLVING DEPOSITORY 
              INSTITUTIONS.

    Section 951 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and 
Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1833a) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(g) Civil Actions for Certain Violations.--A person may bring a 
civil action to assess a civil penalty for a violation referred to in 
subsection (c) in the same manner and subject to the same procedures as 
a person may bring an action under section 3730 of title 31, United 
States Code, for a violation of section 3729 of such title.''.

                                 <all>
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate ldentifier: 2010~NM-030-AD

Executive Order 12866: Cou.ld the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action",? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explalll NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the ADhave asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number ofsmall entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is 

### itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
#### § 1004.120 Effect of an exclusion on program payments and services.

The effect of an exclusion is set forth in § 1001.1901 of this chapter.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mathematics [electronicresource].**
 
2000 | 2003 | 2005 | 2007 | 2009 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.136/7:
Item Number:0455-Q-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000628047
 
September 10, 2019
<HTML>
<HEAD>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<FONT SIZE=5><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=6><P ALIGN="CENTER">EXHIBIT 10.10</P>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=3><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
</B></FONT><FONT SIZE=4><P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3><P ALIGN="CENTER">TERM NOTE</P>

<P> </P>
<P>$2,700,000								New York, New York</P>
<P>									December <U>30</U>, 1999</P>

<P> </P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		For value received, the undersigned, Moto Photo, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby promises to pay to the order of FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC., a New York corporation (the "Lender"), by wire transfer to any account or place
designated at any time by Lender, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, the principal sum of Two Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,700,000), together with interest on the principal amount hereunder
remaining unpaid from time to time computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a 365-day year, from the date hereof until this Note is fully paid at a fixed annual rate of 8.5%.</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		Principal shall be due and payable in twelve quarterly installments as follows:  $200,000 on the first day of each of April 2000, July 2000, October 2000, and January 2001; $225,000 on the first day of each of April 2001, July
2001, October 2001, and January 2002; and $250,000 on the first day of each of April 2002, July 2002, October 2002, and January 2003.</P>

<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		Interest shall be payable quarterly in arrears on the same dates on which payments of principal are due and payable.</P>

<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time without penalty or premium, provided that any prepayment of the full amount of the Note shall include accrued interest thereon and any prepayment in
part shall be applied to payment of the principal installments hereof in inverse order of maturity. </P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		The undersigned hereby agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees and legal expenses, in the event this Note is not paid when due, whether or not legal proceedings are commenced.</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">		Presentment or other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are expressly waived.</P>

<P> </P><DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>
<DIR>

<P>MOTO PHOTO, INC.</P>

<P> </P>
<P> </P><DIR>
<DIR>

<P>By: <U>						</P>
</U><P>       Michael F. Adler</P>
<P>       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer</P></DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</DIR>
</FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
#### Brady Otis BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 58631.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1981.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1981.

Clinton H. Coulter, Jr. of Duvall & Coulter, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and A. S. Johnston and Miguel A. Olivella, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1972), we accepted jurisdiction to resolve the conflict between the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in the instant case, 380 So.2d 457, and the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in *St. John v. State,*363 So.2d 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). We have since resolved the issue in *State v. Webb,*398 So.2d 820 (Fla.1981). The decision of the instant district court is in agreement with our decision. We have also considered petitioner's attack on the legality of the instant search and seizure and have determined it to be without merit. Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., dissents.
# Angola

92 items

        -    Report  		Angola	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Angola	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Angola	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Angola	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Angola (17-1002) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  October 2, 2017 
        -    Report  		Angola	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Angola	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Angola	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Angola	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		2015 Final Communique Plenary Session Luanda	  November 20, 2015 

previous page1…78910next page

Back to Top
#### June Rose YOUNG, Appellant, v. Edward W. YOUNG, Sr., Appellee.

No. 74-708.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.