alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. ORTIZ, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Ortiz*(1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 487.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County.

No. L-96-310.

Decided Aug. 29, 1997.

*Julia R. Bates,*Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Craig T. Pearson,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*William A. Garrett,*for appellant.

Sherck, Judge.

In 1988, appellant, William F. Ortiz, was sentenced to prison for three consecutive eighteen-month terms, following his conviction on multiple counts of forgery. In a separate, unrelated case, appellant received a six-month sentence. When appellant was delivered into the custody of the Ohio Department of *488Rehabilitation and Correction, a clerical error occurred. The order of imprisonment on the forgery convictions was filed under the name of another William Ortiz who was also in the prison system. As a result of this error, appellant was released from incarceration at the end of his six-month sentence and moved to Texas.

In 1996, appellant returned to the Midwest, settling in Michigan. Ultimately, he was arrested and brought before the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. That court overruled his motion to dismiss and ordered him again into the custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction for the purpose of completing his 1988 sentence.

Appellant now appeals that order, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence him. Pursuant to Sixth Dist.Loc.App.R. 12(C), we *sua sponte*transfer this matter to our accelerated docket and, hereby, render our decision.

Appellant’s entire argument is premised on his assertion that he was “resentenced.” He was not. A trial court may not amend or increase punishment once execution of the sentence is commenced. *State v. Greulich*(1988), 61 Ohio App.3d 22, 26, 572 N.E.2d 132, 134-135. This is the “resentencing” that we have prohibited. *In re Zilba*(1996), 110 Ohio App.3d 258, 262-263, 673 N.E.2d 997, 999-1000. Appellant’s sentence was in no way amended or increased. The trial court merely returned appellant to the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to complete his 1988 sentence, which was inadvertently interrupted.

Nevertheless, we are not unsympathetic toward appellant’s plight. His alleged exemplary behavior during his seven-year liberty, coupled with the basic unfairness of the situation, make a strong cry for relief. However, such pleas should be directed to the trial court in a motion for shock probation or to a pardon board or a parole board when the opportunity is presented.

On consideration, appellant’s sole assignment of error is found not well taken. The judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Costs to appellant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Handwork and Glasser, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.39**
**Summary Description of Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan**
The Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. (“Engenio”) 2004 Incentive Plan (Engenio Plan) is asubset of the LSI Logic Corporation Section 16(b) Executive Officer Incentive Plan (“LSI LogicPlan”) and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of LSI Logic Corporation.The Board of Directors of LSI Logic Corporation approved the Engenio Plan in February2004. The targets and funding mechanics of the Engenio Plan are specific to Engenio and are asfollows:
The funding of the Plan is determined using constant multiples of operating income and incrementalrevenue. A fixed percentage of operating income and incremental revenue fund the incentive pool.The bonus pool would increase if Engenio’s revenues grew during the year 2004.
The funding is subject to a threshold of a minimum of 50% to a maximum of 150% of targeted funding.
HomeNew Zealand

# New Zealand

120 items

        -    		Rostos da propaganda do Kremlin: Maria Zakharova	  24 de Abril de 2023 
        -    		Faces of Kremlin Propaganda: Maria Zakharova	  April 24, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		ANZAC Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 24, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with New Zealand Foreign Minister Mahuta	  April 5, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And New Zealand Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2023NATO Headquarters Brussels, Belgium 
        -    Media Note  		Declaration of the Summit for Democracy	  March 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: New Zealand	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Marking One Year Since the Release of the Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy	  February 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Official Murray’s Travel to New Zealand, Australia, and Palm Springs	  February 10, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		New Zealand Waitangi Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 3, 2023 

previous page1…34567…12next page

Back to Top
**Attachment F**  **:** Worksheet s for Estimating OPP I CR Wage Rates for Industry and EPA L abor. 

### NA **ICS: 325300 Pesticide Registrants**  Labor Category : Formula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourl y Rate 1 = W $57.42 $28.32 $17.02 Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44% Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $25.31 $12.49 $7.50 Loaded Hourl y Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $82.73 $40.81 $24.52 Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*L o $41.37 $20.40 $12.26 Fully Lo aded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH = W + B + OH $124.10 $61.21 $36.79 1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm **May 2011** NAI CS 325300 - Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing Standard Occupational Classification (SOC): Management: 11 - 0000, Management

Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science

Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0000, Office and Administrative Support

Occupations 2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. The average for non farm, non federal civilian workers. 3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency , EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , EPA - 452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pg. 2 - 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.

### NA **ICS: 999100**

**EPA or Federal Government**  Labor Category : Formula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourl y Rate 1 = W $55.67 $36.02 $20.38 Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44% Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.54 $15.88 $8.98 Loaded Hourl y Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $80.21 $51.90 $29.36 Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*L o $40.11 $25.95 $14.68 Fully L oaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH = W + B + OH $120.32 $77.85 $44.05 1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm **May 2011** NAI CS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch Standard Occupational Classification (SOC): Management: 11 - 0000, Management Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations 2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. The average for non farm, non federal civilian workers. 3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency , EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , EPA - 452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pg. 2 - 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2873

To amend title 10, United States Code, to limit the collection and use

by the Department of Defense of individual genetic identifying information for the purpose of identification of remains, other than when the

consent of the individual concerned is obtained.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1996

Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to limit the collection

and use by the Department of Defense of individual

genetic identifying information for the purpose of identification of remains, other than when the consent of the

individual concerned is obtained.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF GENETIC INFORMA4 TION BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 49 of title 10, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new section:
2

•HR 2873 IH

1 ‘‘§ 983. Use of genetic identifying information: limita2 tion

3 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION.—In any case in which the Sec4 retary of Defense obtains from any person blood samples

5 or other organic matter of that person that could be used

6 to obtain genetic information concerning that person, such

7 genetic information may be derived from such organic

8 matter, or used, without the consent of that person only

9 for the purpose of identification of remains.

10 ‘‘(b) NOTICE.—Whenever a Department of Defense

11 health care professional obtains a blood sample or other

12 organic matter from a person, the person shall be provided

13 notice of the provisions of subsection (a).’’.

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

15 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

16 at the end the following new item:

‘‘983. Use of genetic identifying information: limitation.’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Wilfred Ellis PIERPONT, Appellee.

No. 58423.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 21, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Roy W. Allman, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit granting ap-pellee’s motion to dismiss and declaring section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1979), unconstitutional is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with *State v. Benitez,*395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981).

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6477] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “A Circus Family: Picasso to Leger,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Baltimore Museum of Art, Baltimore, MD, from on or about February 22, 2009, until on or about May 17, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: December 22, 2008. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E9-208 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Mrs. Sarah Lubritz PASTERNACK v. Ronald R. LUBRITZ.

No. 51823.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 23, 1980.

Zachary & Gillespie, Dave A. Matison, III, Hattiesburg, for appellee.

Zuccaro, Riley, Pintard & Brown, Walter Brown, Natchez, for appellant.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Forrest County; Sebe Dale, Jr., Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 1085 Employed part time (persons who usually work Number in thousands 16 to 17 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU02600086Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Part Time - 16-

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:04 PM)
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY /s/ Frank West                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Frank West               |
|   | Title:  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |  Date:  August 6, 2009     |

|   | of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital Corporation and will be |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | retained by Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | upon request. |
|--------|---------------|
#### § 551.408 Charitable contributions.

Unless specifically authorized by OFAC pursuant to this part, no charitable contribution of funds, goods, services, or technology, including contributions to relieve human suffering, such as food, clothing, or medicine, may be made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201. For the purposes of this part, a contribution is made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201 if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, such a person; if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, an entity or individual acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled by, such a person; or if made in an attempt to violate, to evade, or to avoid the bar on the provision of contributions by, to, or for the benefit of such a person, or the receipt of contributions from such a person.
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections
1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

|1. |  | Patrick J. Mitchell is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
               Ascent Assurance, Inc. (the Company).
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Cynthia B. Koenig is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
               the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | To the best of our knowledge:
|-- |  | -----------------------------

| | (A) | The Companys Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003
               accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
               Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27, 2004

| | /s/ Patrick J. MitchellPatrick J. MitchellChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | /s/ Cynthia B. KoenigCynthia
B. KoenigSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005147EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 June 2005

(2005/C 147/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2115 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4429 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66465 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2750 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5395 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,07 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9560 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5742 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,960 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,97 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0564 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 162 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,43 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,394 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6564 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5738 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4984 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4205 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6988 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0261 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 228,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1826 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0270 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3030 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 663,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,605 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,026 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,599 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2115

JPY

Japanese yen

132,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4429

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66465

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2750

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5395

ISK

Iceland króna

79,07

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9560

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5742

CZK

Czech koruna

29,960

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,97

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0564

ROL

Romanian leu

36 162

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,43

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,394

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6564

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5738

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4984

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4205

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6988

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0261

KRW

South Korean won

1 228,70

ZAR

South African rand

8,1826

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0270

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3030

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 663,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,605

PHP

Philippine peso

67,026

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6200

THB

Thai baht

49,599

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Bangladesh

214 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 4, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 4, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bangladesh	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 21, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 21, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 20, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 20, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 16, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 14, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 14, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 13, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 13, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On Worker Rights and Wage Protests in Bangladesh	  Matthew MillerNovember 8, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 6, 2023	  Vedant PatelNovember 6, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 

previous page123456…22next page

Back to Top
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation
(the  "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Michael D. Becker,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based upon my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies  with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                            /s/ Michael D. Becker
                                            ------------------------------------
Dated:   August 9, 2005                     Michael D. Becker, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)