alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 588.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BRUCE SWINFORD,

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

Respondent. 

____________________ 

2010-3025 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in 

DC1221070032-B-2. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JAY P. HOLLAND, Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA, 

Greenbelt, Maryland, argued for petitioner. With him on 

the brief was PUJA GUPTA. 

JANE W. VANNEMAN, Senior Trial Attorney, 

Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued 

for respondent. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, 

Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 

Director, and TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director. 
 Of counsel on the brief was WILLIAM WINNE, Attorney 

Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway 

Administration, United States Department of 

Transportation, of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 14, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
HomeRussia

# Russia

1815 items

        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (17-324) – Extension to Agreement of December 16, 1994 Concerning Space Cooperation Customs Procedures	  March 24, 2017 
        -    Report  		Russia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		New START Treaty Inspection Activities	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Lacey Act Amendment Programming (Summary)	  July 28, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (16-624) – Extension for Agreement of December 16, 1993 Regarding Scientific and Technical Cooperation	  June 24, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (15-1204) – Agreement on Fisheries Cooperation	  December 4, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (15-825) – Extension to Agreement of May 31, 1988 on Fisheries Relations	  August 25, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (14-124) – Agreement on Cooperation in Nuclear and Energy Related Scientific Research and Development	  January 24, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (13-1227) – Agreement Amending and Extending Agreement for Transfer of Nuclear Fuel	  December 27, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (13-1007) – Agreement on Nonproliferation Nuclear Risk Reduction Centers with Amendment	  October 7, 2013 

previous page1…175176177178179…182next page

Back to Top
# C_2005189EN.01000401.xml

| 3.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/4

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 August 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 August 2005

(2005/C 189/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2217 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4600 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3721 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5566 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9554 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5737 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,005 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,91 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0550 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4779 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,902 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6171 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5979 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4803 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4960 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7759 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0194 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 246,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9529 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8997 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3048 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 911,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,577 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,409 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9210 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,536 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2217

JPY

Japanese yen

136,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4600

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3721

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5566

ISK

Iceland króna

78,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9554

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5737

CZK

Czech koruna

30,005

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,91

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0550

RON

Romanian leu

3,4779

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,902

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6171

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5979

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4803

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4960

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7759

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0194

KRW

South Korean won

1 246,68

ZAR

South African rand

7,9529

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8997

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3048

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 911,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,577

PHP

Philippine peso

68,409

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9210

THB

Thai baht

50,536

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Nicaragua

139 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Nicaragua	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    		Biographies of the Finalists for the 2021 International Women of Courage Awards	   
        -    Report  		Nicaragua	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nicaragua	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nicaragua	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Nicaragua	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nicaragua	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Defending Freedom	   
        -    Report  		Nicaragua	  July 19, 2018 

previous page1…1011121314next page

Back to Top
§ 598.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a specially designated narcotics trafficker, the transferred property will no longer be considered property in which that person has or has had an interest. Provided no other specially designated narcotics trafficker has any interest in the transferred property following the transfer, the transferred property will no longer be considered property blocked pursuant to § 598.202.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a specially designated narcotics trafficker, such property shall be deemed to be property in which that person has an interest, and such property is therefore blocked pursuant to § 598.202.
HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...the United States Presidents Emergency Plan for Aids Relief  Releases

# The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Releases

99 items

        -    		PEPFAR Latest Global Results & Projections Factsheet (Dec. 2023)	  November 30, 2023 
        -    Video Remarks  		Video Remarks at the Global Health Security and Diplomacy Symposium	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 13, 2023Council on Foreign RelationsWashington, DC 
        -    Other Release  		PEPFAR Launches New Effort to Fight TB: Goal to Detect Two Million Cases and Prevent 500,000 Deaths	  September 22, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Launch of the Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 1, 2023Dean Acheson AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		New PEPFAR Initiative: Safe Births, Healthy Babies	  August 1, 2023 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Deliver Remarks at the Launch of the Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy	  July 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Gupta Travels to Kenya and Rwanda	  July 11, 2023 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		PEPFAR, Global Fund and UNAIDS Leaders Visit Mozambique in Support of a Sustainable HIV/AIDS Response	  June 16, 2023 
        -    PEPFAR Statement  		Joint Statement by the Leaders of the Global Fund, UNAIDS and PEPFAR on Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023	  May 29, 2023 
        -    		PEPFAR Employment Opportunities	   

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
HomeLebanon

# Lebanon

242 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Press Briefing with Tim Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  August 23, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Dermer	  August 17, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Counter Terrorism Designations of One Hizballah Affiliated Entity and Its Leader	  Matthew MillerAugust 16, 2023 
        -    		Lebanon Sanctions	   
        -    Press Statement  		Joint U.S., U.K. and Canadian Sanctions Against Former Lebanese Official and Co-Conspirators in Corruption Scheme	  Matthew MillerAugust 10, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Third Anniversary of the Beirut Port Explosion	  Matthew MillerAugust 4, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 27, 2023	  Vedant PatelJuly 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 20, 2023	  Matthew MillerJuly 20, 2023 

previous page123456…25next page

Back to Top
LARANCE SCOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4391

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Larance Scott, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 596.504 Certain financial transactions with Terrorism List Governments authorized. ( a ) United States persons are authorized to engage in all financial transactions with a Terrorism List Government that is not otherwise subject to 31 CFR chapter V, except for a transfer from a Terrorism List Government: ( 1 ) Constituting a donation to a United States person; or
( 2 ) With respect to which the United States person knows (including knowledge based on advice from an agent of the United States Government), or has reasonable cause to believe, that the transfer poses a risk of furthering terrorist acts in the United States.
( b ) Nothing in this section authorizes the return of a transfer prohibited by paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
#### Raymond CASABELLA and Jackie Casabella v. WILLIAM RUSSELL BONDS CO., INC.

No. 52362.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1981.

Duncan Lott, Langston & Lott, Boone-ville, for appellants.

L. F. Sams, Jr., Mitchell, McNutt, Bush, Lagrone & Sams, Tupelo, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tishomingo County; Fred Wicker, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
HomeNepal

# Nepal

79 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara’s Travel to Sri Lanka, Nepal, Laos, and Singapore	  March 22, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Supporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand, Malaysia, Nepal, and India	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Kathmandu, Nepal: Lincoln School: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 29, 2024 
        -    TIAS  		Nepal (23-1206) – Amendment to the Agreement Relating to the Establishment of a Peace Corps Program in Nepal	  December 6, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Kathmandu, Nepal: Lincoln School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Nepali Foreign Minister Saud	  October 30, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Nepali Foreign Minister Narayan Prakash Saud Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 30, 2023Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    DSS Articles  		DSS Foreign Service National Investigator takes self-improvement to the highest level – Mount Everest	  October 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons Announces Five New Recipients of 2023 Program to End Modern Slavery Awards	  September 29, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Nepal National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 19, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### William Louis DEFREEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-72.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 3, 1979.

*606Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, Karal B. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, and Daniel L. Perry, Legal Intern, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

William Louis Defreest, appellant/defendant, appeals from the revocation of his probation by the lower court. While we affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, we once again find it necessary to remand a case to the lower court with orders that the judgment be affirmed but that the imposition of costs against an insolvent defendant be stricken. *Cox v. State,*334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976), is very explicit. The trial court cannot impose court costs against a defendant who has been declared insolvent.

Accordingly, we remand this case to the lower court with the instructions that the imposition of costs against appellant be stricken. We otherwise affirm.

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
§ 560.521 Diplomatic pouches. The following transactions are authorized: ( a ) The importation into the United States from Iran, or the exportation from the United States to Iran, of diplomatic pouches and their contents; and
( b ) The exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, of any goods or technology to a third-country government, or to its contractors or agents, for shipment to Iran via a diplomatic pouch. To the extent necessary, this section also authorizes the shipment of such goods or technology by the third-country government to Iran via a diplomatic pouch.
Note to paragraph ( b
) of § 560.521 :
The exportation or reexportation of certain U.S.-origin goods or technology to a third-country government, or to its contractors or agents, may require authorization by the U.S. Department of Commerce under the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774).
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2961

For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. DOYLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 The time limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of

5 title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

6 to the awarding of the medal of honor to Wayne T.

7 Alderson of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in recognition of

8 acts performed at the risk of his life and beyond the call

9 of duty while serving as a private first class in the United

10 States Army in Germany during World War II.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 84402


# FILED MAY 1 6 2022
E FI A k gf AIPREI

RON cLE E COURT 5.y 8y DEPUTY CLERK VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, D/B/A CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, vs. ESTATE OF REBECCA POWELL, THROUGH BRIAN POWELL, AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR; DARCI CREECY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR; TARYN CREECY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR; ISAIAH KHOSROF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR; AND LLOYD CREECY, INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROLZ

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Paul Padda Law, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk BY:

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 A. 2 - /5 332-
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2942

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent the canceling

of annuities to certain divorced spouses of workers whose widows elect

to receive lump sum payments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent

the canceling of annuities to certain divorced spouses

of workers whose widows elect to receive lump sum

payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Retirement

5 Amendment Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF DIVORCED SPOUSES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(c) of the Railroad Re8 tirement Act of 1974 is amended—
2

•HR 2942 IH

1 (1) in the last sentence of paragraph (1), by in2 serting ‘‘(other than to a survivor in the cir3 cumstances described in paragraph (3))’’ after ‘‘no

4 further benefits shall be paid’’; and

5 (2) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(3) Notwithstanding the last sentence of para7 graph (1), benefits shall be paid to a survivor who—

8 ‘‘(A) is a divorced wife; and

9 ‘‘(B) through administrative error received

10 benefits otherwise precluded by the making of a

11 lump sum payment under this section to a

12 widow;

13 if that divorced wife makes an election to repay to

14 the Board the lump sum payment. The Board may

15 withhold up to 10 percent of each benefit amount

16 paid after the date of the enactment of this para17 graph toward such reimbursement. The Board may

18 waive such repayment to the extent the Board deter19 mines it would cause an unjust financial hardship

20 for the beneficiary.’’.

21 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

22 made by this section shall apply with respect to any bene23 fits paid before the date of enactment of this Act as well
3

•HR 2942 IH

1 as to benefits payable on or after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2955 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2955

             To stop abuse of Federal collateral remedies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1996

 Mr. Shadegg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To stop abuse of Federal collateral remedies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Habeas Corpus Reformation Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. STOPPING ABUSE OF FEDERAL COLLATERAL REMEDIES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 153 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at end the following:
``Sec. 2257. Adequacy of State remedies
    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an application for a 
writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to a 
judgment or order of a State court shall not be entertained by a judge 
or a court of the United States unless the remedies in the courts of 
the State are inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the 
person's detention.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 153 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``2257. Adequacy of State remedies.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 592.306 Importing authority. ( a ) The term *importing authority* means one or more entities designated by a Participant into whose territory a shipment of rough diamonds is being imported as having the authority to enforce the laws and regulations of the Participant regulating imports, including the verification of the Kimberley Process Certificate accompanying the shipment.
( b ) The importing authorities for the United States are the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection or, in the case of a territory or possession of the United States with its own customs administration, analogous officials.
Note to § 592.306 .
The Secretary of State will periodically publish in the Federal Register an up-to-date listing of the importing authorities of all Participants.
HomeMorocco

# Morocco

163 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Supports African Innovation In Morocco	  June 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Morocco	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 15, 2023	  Vedant PatelMay 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Morocco	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita	  May 14, 2023 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Tangier, Morocco: The American School of Tangier: 2022-2023 Special Needs Profile	  May 10, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Major General Matthew McFarlane, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, and Dana Stroul, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense	  April 24, 2023Dubai Hub 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita Before Their Meeting	  March 20, 2023Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Morocco	  March 20, 2023 

previous page1…34567…17next page

Back to Top