alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 515.528 Certain transactions with respect to blocked foreign intellectual property. ( a ) The following transactions by any person who is not a designated national are hereby authorized: ( 1 ) The filing and prosecution of any application for a blocked foreign patent, trademark or copyright, or for the renewal thereof;
( 2 ) The receipt of any blocked foreign patent, trademark or copyright;
( 3 ) The filing and prosecution of opposition or infringement proceedings with respect to any blocked foreign patent, trademark, or copyright, and the prosecution of a defense to any such proceedings;
( 4 ) The payment of fees currently due to the government of any foreign country, either directly or through an attorney or representative, in connection with any of the transactions authorized by paragraphs (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section or for the maintenance of any blocked foreign patent, trademark or copyright; and
( 5 ) The payment of reasonable and customary fees currently due to attorneys or representatives in any foreign country incurred in connection with any of the transactions authorized by paragraphs (a) (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this section.
( b ) Payments effected pursuant to the terms of paragraphs (a) (4) and (5) of this section may not be made from any blocked account.
( c ) As used in this section the term *blocked foreign patent, trademark, or copyright* shall mean any patent, petty patent, design patent, trademark or copyright issued by any foreign country in which a designated foreign country or national thereof has an interest, including any patent, petty patent, design patent, trademark, or copyright issued by a designated foreign country.
[28 FR 6974, July 9, 1963, as amended at 60 FR 54196, Oct. 20, 1995]
HomeIndia

# India

438 items

        -    DipNote  		Recognizing the 2023 Anti-Corruption Champions  	  Todd D.  RobinsonDecember 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 5, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 5, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 4, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 4, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: India	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		COP28 Briefing with Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry	  November 29, 2023DUBAI HUB 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 10, 2023Leela PalaceNew Delhi, India 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Indian Prime Minister Modi	  November 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Fifth Annual India-U.S. 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue	  November 10, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Indian External Affairs Minister Jaishankar	  November 10, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, And Indian Minister of Defense Rajnath Singh Remarks Before the U.S.-India 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 10, 2023Sushma Swaraj BhavanNew Delhi, India 

previous page1…56789…44next page

Back to Top
§ 591.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 591.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note to § 591.504 :
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 591.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duane J. WEAVER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-30089.

D.C. No. CR-99-5497-JET.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.

Decided Feb. 16, 2001.

*411Before RYMER, THOMAS, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Duane J. Weaver appeals from his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. *See United States v. Kakatin,*214 F.3d 1049, 1051 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

Weaver first argues that the two-point enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d) violates due process because he was placed on inactive probation and was effectively unsupervised after 1987. However, active supervision is not required for § 4A1.1(d) to apply. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d), Application Note 4 (“active supervision is not required for this item to apply.”); *see also United States v. McCrudden,*894 F.2d 338, 339 (9th Cir. 1990) (“The non-supervisory status of a sentence of probation does not exempt it from section 4A1.1(d).”) Weaver remained under the jurisdiction of the court and was still under a criminal justice sentence when the scheme to defraud began in June, 1992.

Weaver also argues that to apply § 4A.l.l(d) without finding that he willfully failed to make restitution payments violates due process under *United States v. Parks,*89 F.3d 570 (9th Cir.1996). Unlike *Parks,*Weaver was not under a sentence of legal financial obligation when he committed this offense. He had been sentenced to probation and a 10-year deferred sentence, and as part of the same sentence was ordered to make restitution within his ability to pay.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 588.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 588.507(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 588.201, is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 588.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (a) of this section authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 588.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) Email (preferred method): *OFACReport@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) U.S. mail: OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2642

To provide for the conveyance of the U.S.S. Hoga to the city of Eureka,

California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 1995

Mr. RIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of the U.S.S. Hoga to the

city of Eureka, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF OBSOLETE VESSEL U.S.S.

4 HOGA.

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (d) of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code,

7 but subject to subsections (b) and (c) of that section, upon

8 the decommissioning of the U.S.S. Hoga, the Secretary

9 of the Navy shall transfer the U.S.S. Hoga to the city

10 of Eureka, California.
2

•HR 2642 IH

1 (b) LIMITATION.—The transfer authorized by sub2 section (a) may be made only if the Secretary determines

3 that the vessel U.S.S. Hoga is of no further use to the

4 United States for national security purposes.

5 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may

6 require such terms and conditions in connection with the

7 transfer authorized by this section as the Secretary consid8 ers appropriate.

Æ
#### § 596.202 Evasions; attempts; conspiracies.

Any transaction for the purpose of, or which has the effect of, evading or avoiding, or which facilitates the evasion or avoidance of, any of the prohibitions set forth in this part, is hereby prohibited. Any attempt to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is hereby prohibited. Any conspiracy formed for the purpose of engaging in a transaction prohibited by this part is hereby prohibited.
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellant,

9 v. No. 30,261

10 OSCAR H.,

11 Child-Appellee.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY

13 Robert S. Orlik, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 M. Victoria Wilson

17 Albuquerque, NM

18 for Appellant

19 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender

20 Oscar Hernandez, Assistant Appellate Defender

21 Santa Fe, NM

22 for Appellee

23 MEMORANDUM OPINION

24 SUTIN, Judge.
2

1 The State appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice a

2 delinquency petition alleging that Child committed assault on a peace officer and

3 aggravated battery on a peace officer. We issued a notice of proposed summary

4 disposition, proposing to affirm. According to the response filed by the State, the

5 State does not oppose the proposed summary disposition. Based on the State’s

6 response, and for the reasons in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we

7 affirm the order of dismissal.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________

10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 ___________________________________

13 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

14 ___________________________________

15 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
No. 99-6389.

#### In re Stone.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,660,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,361,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,994,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (172,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    205,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               626,000
<PP&E>                                      14,124,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,419,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,846,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,594,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       704,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,245,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,846,000
<SALES>                                      5,408,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,120,000
<CGS>                                        3,229,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,351,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,744,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (539,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (539,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (539,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
Independent Auditor's Report


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Washington County National Bank
Williamsport, Maryland


     We have audited the balance sheet of Washington County National Bank as of
December 31, 1994 and the related statements of income, changes in shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1994 (not presented separately herein). These financial statements are the
responsiblity of the Bank's management. Our responsiblity is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statemnts. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Washington County National
Bank as of December 31, 1994, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1994 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

     As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Bank changed its
method of accounting for investments in the year ended December 31, 1994 and its
method of account for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 1993.



                                     Smith Elliott Kearns and Company


Hagerstown, Maryland
January 13, 1995
EX-10.4





 Exhibit 10.4 

Austerlitz Acquisition Corporation II 

1701 Village Center Circle 
 Las
Vegas, NV 89134 
 March 2, 2021 
 Cannae
Holdings, Inc. 
 1701 Village Center Circle 
 Las Vegas, NV
89134 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 This letter will confirm our
agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Austerlitz Acquisition Corporation II (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the completion by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae Holdings”) or an affiliate thereof shall
take steps, directly or indirectly, to make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1701 Village Center Circle, Las Vegas, NV 89134 (or
any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Cannae Holdings a sum of $5,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Cannae Holdings hereby agrees that it
does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the
“Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason
whatsoever. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 












 
			
	Very truly yours,
	
	AUSTERLITZ ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael L. Gravelle
		 	Name: Michael L. Gravelle
		 	Title: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


  

			
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	
	CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Michael L. Gravelle
		 	Name: Michael L. Gravelle
		 	Title: Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


 [Signature Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
Exhibit 23

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the 2004 Annual Report of Harleysville National
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Harleysville National Corporation on Form S-4 (File No. 333-111709, effective February 6, 2004), and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-69784, effective
October 1, 1993, File No. 333-17813, effective December 13, 1996, File No. 333-79971, effective June 4, 1999, and File
No. 333-79973, effective June 4, 1999, File No. 333-116183, effective June 4, 2004).

LOGO

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 9, 2005

---



QuickLinks
#### § 548.322 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
FEDERAL RCRA CITATION

• •

5/19/95

RCRA Revision Checklist

HSWA

STATE ANALOG IS:

STATE CITATION MORE BROADER

INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE EQUIVALENT STRINGENT IN SCOPE

Part 268

Comment:

OAR 340-1 00-002(1) x
#### Linda Moffett HENRY, Individually, etc. v. Richard R. BELGARD.

No. 64525.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

In re Linda Moffett Henry, Individually, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Rapides. 368 So.2d 472.

Writ denied.
HomeBelgium

# Belgium

248 items

        -    TIAS  		Belgium (10-201.25) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (07-1228.2) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 28, 2007 
        -    		2007 Final Communique Plenary Session Brussels	  November 8, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (06-601) – Agreement on the Gainful Occupation of Certain Dependents of Diplomatic and Consular Personnel	  June 1, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (05-310) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  March 10, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (00-101) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  January 1, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (97-901) – Treaty on Extradition	  September 1, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		SUPREME HEADQUARTERS ALLIED POWERS EUROPE (95-131) – Agreement concerning Defense Mutual Logistic Support	  January 31, 1995 

previous page1…232425

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,922
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,898
<PP&E>                                          37,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           344
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,273
<SALES>                                         18,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,880
<CGS>                                           10,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   585
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                       638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,238
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
No. 00-5863.

#### Flynn v. United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.