alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Costa Rica National Day

# 									Costa Rica National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 15, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate Costa Rica on the 202nd celebration of its Independence Day.  The partnership between Costa Rica and the United States rests upon our shared commitments to democracy, economic prosperity, environmental conservation, human rights, and security.  On this special day, we are grateful for Costa Rica’s leadership in the region and our collaboration to fight transnational crime and encourage humane migration management.  We look forward to further collaboration on diversifying hemispheric supply chains and other shared priorities.

Costa Rica’s efforts towards strengthening democratic institutions and sustaining prosperity for all its citizens serve as an inspiration in the region and in the United States.  In the spirit of this friendship, the people of the United States wish a joyous Independence Day to Costa Ricans everywhere.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCosta RicaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
693 A.2d 195

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Craig B. SOKOLOW, Respondent.

No. 133 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 24, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 1997, there having been filed with this Court by Craig B. Sokolow his verified Statement of Resignation dated March 12, 1997, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Craig B. Sokolow be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
# Kosovo

139 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 15, 2021	  Ned PriceNovember 15, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Western Balkans	  October 20, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs	  Gabriel EscobarSeptember 30, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Kosovo Prime Minister Kurti	  September 6, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Kosovo (21-825) – Temporary Relocation Transit Agreement	  August 25, 2021 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Small Wins Have Big Impacts in the Balkans	  July 28, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Kosovo	  July 28, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Kosovo	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Kosovo	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The Stability and Security of the Western Balkans	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 8, 2021 

previous page1…89101112…14next page

Back to Top
§ 589.301 Arctic offshore projects. ( a ) The term *Arctic offshore projects* as used in § 589.205 means projects that have the potential to produce oil in areas that— ( 1 ) Involve drilling operations originating offshore, and
( 2 ) Are located above the Arctic Circle.
( b ) The term *Arctic offshore projects* as used in § 589.205 does not apply to horizontal drilling operations originating onshore where such drilling operations extend under the seabed to areas above the Arctic Circle.
#### Richard Earl LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. WW-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1981.

*1028Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Lee appeals the denial of his motion to correct his sentence, arguing that he was entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the Florida Youthful Offender Act, § 958, Fla. Stat.(1979). We agree and reverse.

The trial court’s denial of relief was based upon two grounds: (1) that classification under the Youthful Offender Act was discretionary; and (2) that Lee’s conviction for armed robbery, pursuant to § 812.-13(2)(a), Fla.Stat.(1979), precluded youthful offender treatment.

In *Goodson v. State,*392 So.2d 1335, 1336 (Fla.1st DCA 1980), this court held that classification as a youthful offender is mandatory if the criteria set forth in §§ 958.04(1) and (2), Fla.Stat., are met.*

Additionally, the trial court relied upon § 958.04(l)(c), Fla.Stat., which provides in part that “no person who has been found guilty of a capital or life felony may be classified [as] a youthful offender.... ” The court reasoned that this statute was applicable because armed robbery is punishable by life imprisonment. However, armed robbery is not a “life felony,” but instead, it is a “felony of the first degree.” *See*§ 812.13(2)(a) and § 775.081(1), Fla.Stat. Therefore, the trial court incorrectly found that Lee’s conviction for armed robbery precluded his treatment as a youthful offender.

The trial court’s Order is reversed, and this cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

*

 The holding in *Goodson*was premised upon the actual language in §§ 958.04(1) and (2), Fla. Stat.(1979). In 1980, that language was amended so as to make youthful offender classification a discretionary matter in all circumstances. *See*§ 958.04, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1980). However, the *1980*amendments are not applicable to this case.
695 A.2d 782

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Joseph DeMESQUITA, Respondent.

No. 151 Disciplinary Counsel No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 13, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 1997, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 17, 1997, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Joseph DeMesquita be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, retroactive to October 2,1995, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J. dissents and would disbar respondent.

NIGRO, J., dissents and would suspend respondent for a period of five years.
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Tanzania Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Tanzania Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges:******Although Tanzania has made significant economic and political progress, it continues to face criminal justice and transnational crime challenges. Tanzania is vulnerable to terrorism, trafficking of illegal goods including wildlife and drugs, criminal smuggling,and maritime crimes in its coastal waters. Further, Tanzania is located along major heroin trafficking routes from Southwest Asia. Tanzania’s location, porous borders, and persistent corruption present challenges to drug interdictions. 

**Goals:******Tanzania is a key partner of the United States and an integral member of both eastern and southern African regional organizations. INL supports Tanzanian law enforcement to enhance its drug interdiction capacity, improve its maritime security, and enact justice sector improvements.INL also supportscriminal justice actors to counter violent extremism through community policing and to prosecute terrorism cases.

**Accomplishments:**
        - INL is working with  Tanzania’s law enforcement aut horities to  disrupt transnational organized crime ,  focused currently  on  counter ing  na rcotics  trafficking  and maritime security .  Tanzani a benefits from  INL ’s regional program with  the  U N  Office o n  Drug s  and Crime ( UNODC )  that  support s  civilian maritime law enforcement agencies  disrupt ion of  transnational organized crime at sea through effective patrolling; developing the capacity of the judicial system to pursue legal finish; and increasing regional cooperation .  
        - INL also works with law enforcement and the judicial sector to counter vi olent extremism in Tanzania.  Under the Partnership for Reg ional East Africa  Counterterrorism,  INL  supported a Resident Legal A dvisor to  help law enforcement,  prosecutors, and judge s  improve  investigat ions , prosecut ions , and adjudicat ions of  criminal cases involving complex tran snational crime,  incl u d ing terr o rism and money laundering. INL also supports  community policing initiatives under  the U N  Development  Programme’ s  ( U NDP’s )  Preventing and Responding to Violent Extrem i s m in Tanzania  project .  

Tags

Tanzania

Back to Top
#### Mrs. Laverne Toles WESSON, Administratrix of Estate of Bernard Wesson, Deceased v. Jerry Wayne WILSON.

No. 51881.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 14, 1980.

O’Barr, Hurlbert & O’Barr, Biloxi, William K. Duke, Omar D. Craig, Oxford, for appellant.

Holcomb, Dunbar, Connell, Merkel, Tolli-son & Khayat, Mary Ann Connell, Oxford, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lafayette County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
HomeMarshall Islands

# Marshall Islands

70 items

        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.6) – Federal Programs and Services Agreement	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.5) – Agreement Implementing Section 216 and Section 217 of the Compact, as Amended, Regarding a Trust Fund	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.4) – Status of Forces Agreement	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.3) – Agreement Regarding the Military Use and Operating Rights of the United States in the Marshall Islands	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.2) – Agreement on Extradition, Mutual Assistance in Law Enforcement Matters and Penal Sanctions	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501.1) – Agreement Regarding Protections for Citizens of the Marshall Islands Seeking to Engage in Employment in the United States Pursuant to Recruitment or Other Placement Services	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (04-0501) – Agreement Amending the Agreement of June 25, 1983 Concerning the Compact of Free Association	  May 1, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (03-626.1) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  June 26, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (02-709) – Law Enforcement Agreement Regarding Customs	  July 9, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Marshall Islands (12808) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  October 17, 1996 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
#### § 92.3 Manufacture and sale of “proof” coins.

“Proof” coins, *i.e.*, coins prepared from blanks specially polished and struck, are made as authorized by the Director of the Mint and are sold at a price sufficient to cover their face value plus the additional expense of their manufacture and sale. Their manufacture and issuance are contingent upon the demands of regular operations. Information concerning availability and price may be obtained from the Director of the Mint, Treasury Department, Washington, DC 20220.
#### DORR OLIVER, INC., Appellant, v. CITIES SERVICE COMPANY and Ronnie Hancock et al., Appellees.

No. 74-177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
122 STAT. 2974 PUBLIC LAW 110–296—JULY 30, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3218: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

June 26, considered and passed Senate. 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

fi 

Public Law 110–296 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History Background 

Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 60-month’’ and inserting ‘‘a 66- 

month’’. 

Approved July 30, 2008. 

42 USC 5101 

note. 

Criminal History 

Background 

Checks Pilot 

Extension Act of 

2008. 

July 30, 2008 

[S. 3218] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLIC LAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
June 30, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1999               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        274,821                   274,821
<SECURITIES>                                  313,114                   313,114
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48,690                    48,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         0                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              636,625                   636,625
<PP&E>                                      3,803,639                 3,803,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                746,043                   746,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,694,221                 3,694,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          78,595                    78,595
<BONDS>                                             0                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                         0
<COMMON>                                            0                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,615,626                 3,615,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,694,221                 3,694,221
<SALES>                                       106,201                   215,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              111,985                   229,071
<CGS>                                               0                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               60,224                   115,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                51,761                   113,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            51,761                   113,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                         0
<CHANGES>                                           0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   51,761                   113,205
<EPS-BASIC>                                      3.00                      6.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    3.00                      6.55


</TABLE>
# C_2005147EN.01002101.xml

| 17.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/21

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3593 — Apollo/Bakelite)

(2005/C 147/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005196EN.01000202.xml

| 11.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3779 — Pernod Ricard/Allied Domecq)

(2005/C 196/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3779. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3779. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Croatia

79 items

        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Croatia	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Croatia	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Croatia Statehood Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Croatia	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Croatia	  March 30, 2021 
        -    TIAS  		Croatia (21-105) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Information	  January 5, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Croatia	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Croatia	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Croatia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Croatia	  June 10, 2020 

previous page1…345678next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bennie WATKINS.

No. 80-K-2380.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Bennie Watkins, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and stay order. Parish of Tangipahoa.

Granted.
694 A.2d 1097

#### In the Matter of Joseph J. MARRA.

No. 172 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 21, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 1997, Joseph J. Marra having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated December 30, 1996; the said Joseph J.. Marra having been directed on March 27, 1997, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Joseph J. Marra is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
# C_2005154EN.01001101.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3797 — CGE/AMGA/SMAT/SAP)

(2005/C 154/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3797. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3797. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Dennis L. BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Peter de Manió, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.