alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 8.69 Appeal to the Secretary.

Within 30 days from the date of the Administrative Law Judge's decision, either party may appeal to the Secretary. The appeal will be filed with the Director of Practice in duplicate and will include exceptions to the decision of the Administrative Law Judge and supporting reasons for those exceptions. If the Director of Practice files the appeal, he or she shall transmit a copy of it to the respondent. Within 30 days after receipt of an appeal or copy thereof, the other party may file a reply brief in duplicate with the Director of Practice. If the Director of Practice files the reply brief, he or she shall transmit a copy of it to the respondent. Upon the filing of an appeal and a reply brief, if any, the Director of Practice shall transmit the entire record to the Secretary.
HomeJordan

# Jordan

210 items

        -    TIAS  		Jordan (15-816) – Agreement Regarding Defense Cooperation	  August 16, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (15-624) – Foreign Assistance Loan Guarantee Agreement	  June 24, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (14-929.1) – Agreement Regarding Cooperation to Detect the Presence of and Deter the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  September 29, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (14-621) – Loan Guarantee Agreement	  June 21, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (13-1026) – Loan Guarantee Assistance Agreement	  October 26, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (12-920) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 20, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (11-1213) – Millennium Challenge Compact	  December 13, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (07-612) – Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation	  June 12, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (07-326) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  March 26, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Jordan (06-1107) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement of November 10, 1996	  November 7, 2006 

previous page1…18192021next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of InMedica  Development  Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of
the  Company  on Form  10QSB for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004 fully
complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information  contained in such report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
periods and the results of operations of the Company for such periods.


/s/ Ralph Henson
Ralph Henson,
 Chief Executive Officer
December 27, 2004


/s/ Richard Bruggeman
Richard Bruggeman,
 Chief Financial Officer
December 27, 2004
Document

Exhibit 10.31 


Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy


The following non-employee director compensation shall apply to all non-employee directors of the Company. 


•Each non-employee director will receive an annual cash retainer in the amount of $50,000 per year. 


•The Chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual cash retainer in the amount of $40,000 per year. 


•The chairperson of the audit committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $20,000 per year for such chairperson’s service on the audit committee.  Each non-chairperson member of the audit committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $10,000 per year for such member’s service on the audit committee.


•The chairperson of the compensation committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $15,000 per year for such chairperson’s service on the compensation committee.  Each non-chairperson member of the compensation committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $7,500 per year for such member’s service on the compensation committee.


•The chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $11,250 per year for such chairperson’s service on the nominating and corporate governance committee.  Each non-chairperson member of the nominating and corporate governance committee will receive additional annual cash compensation in the amount of $5,000 per year for such member’s service on the nominating and corporate governance committee. 


•Each non-employee directors will receive a stock option grant with an initial grant equal  75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon a director’s initial appointment or election to the Board of Directors, vesting quarterly over a 3 year period and an annual stock option grant equal 90,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of each annual stockholder’s meeting thereafter, fully vesting in one year from the date of grant.
# France

370 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 2, 2023	  Vedant PatelMay 2, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with French Director General for Foreign Relations and Strategy Rufo	  April 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Descôtes	  April 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Japan 2023 Foreign Ministers’ Communiqué	  April 18, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Foreign Minister Colonna	  April 17, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 10, 2023	  Vedant PatelApril 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Slovakia and France April 11-14, 2023	  April 10, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 6, 2023	  Vedant PatelApril 6, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Beyond the Mirror: The State Department From a French Perspective	  April 5, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Transatlantic Quad Foreign Ministers	  April 4, 2023 

previous page1…7891011…37next page

Back to Top
HomeGuatemala

# Guatemala

181 items

        -    TIAS  		Guatemala (20-1201) – Status of Forces Agreement	  December 1, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Guatemala (20-917) –  Agreement Concerning Temporary Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Worker Programs	  September 17, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Guatemala	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Guatemala	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Guatemala	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Guatemala	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Guatemala (20-207) – Migration and Refugees Agreement	  February 7, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Guatemala (19-1115) – Agreement on Cooperation Regarding the Examination of Protection Claims	   
        -    Report  		Guatemala	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Guatemala	  June 21, 2019 

previous page1…1314151617…19next page

Back to Top
#### § 800.228 Investment fund.

The term *investment fund* means any entity that is an “investment company,” as defined in section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 *et seq.*), or would be an “investment company” but for one or more of the exemptions provided in section 3(b) or 3(c) thereunder.
# Palestinian Territories

503 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 1, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 31, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 31, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Humanitarian Assistance for the Palestinians in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic	  March 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 23, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 23, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 17, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 17, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 15, 2021	  Jalina PorterMarch 15, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 8, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 8, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Opposes the ICC Investigation into the Palestinian Situation	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 3, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 25, 2021	  February 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 23, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 23, 2021Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…4748495051next page

Back to Top
#### Marie DARRAGH, Appellant, v. Cadwallader BROCK and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. KK-102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 9, 1979.

Rehearings Denied Feb. 19, 1979.

John R. Grass, Pensacola, for appellant.

Danny L. Kepner of Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appellee U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Inc.

Donald H. Partington of Clark, Parting-ton, Hart & Hart, Pensacola, for appellee Cadwallader Brock.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant claims on this appeal that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the appellee-insurer. We find no error and affirm.

*802The action aróse out of a physical confrontation between appellant and Brock at his residence during which she allegedly received injuries. She initially sued Brock for intentional tort, but subsequently, upon learning' that his homeowner’s liability insurance excluded coverage for “bodily injury and property damage which is either expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured,” amended her complaint to allege negligence. The insurer argued below and here that Brock’s alleged acts could in no way be considered negligence.

Our review of the record supports the insurer’s position. Whatever the insured’s degree of force might have been, it is clear from the appellant’s own deposition that the natural probable, and intended result of his acts was to harm her. On this record, the'insurer’s liability was precluded as a matter of law. See *West Building Materials, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*368 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); *Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Spreen,*343 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Brock in his individual capacity also filed an “appellee’s brief” in this cause contesting the summary judgment in favor of his insurer. However, he failed to file a cross-appeal indicating his adversity to the appellee-insurer. We therefore find that his motion requesting appellate attorney’s fees against the insurer is precluded. Even if he had proceeded properly, there is not at this point any “judgment or decree . against an insurer and in favor of an insured” justifying an award of attorney’s fees under Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1977).

Accordingly, Brock’s motion for attorney’s fees is DENIED and the summary judgment in favor of U.S.F. & G. is AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., MELVIN, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Joint Open Meeting with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to seek input from the public on harmonization of market regulation on September 2, 2009 from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. at the CFTC and on September 3, 2009 from 9 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. at the SEC.

The Joint Open Meeting will take place on September 2, 2009 at the CFTC's headquarters at Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000), Washington, DC 20581 and on September 3, 2009 at the SEC's headquarters at 100 F Street, NE., Auditorium (Room L-002), Washington, DC 20549. The Joint Open Meeting will be open to the public with seating on a first-come, first-served basis. Visitors will be subject to security checks.

Discussion topics at the Joint Open Meeting will include the regulation of exchanges and markets; the regulation of intermediaries; the regulation of clearance and settlement; enforcement; and the regulation of investment funds. For further information, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: August 25, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-20843 Filed 8-25-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### Luie DRUMMET, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 74-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeIran

# Iran

595 items

        -    Statement of Concern  		Statement on Iran	  July 18, 2019 
        -    Report  		Iran	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Iran	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Iran	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Iran	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)	   
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Iran	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Report  		Iran	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Iran	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Iran	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…57585960next page

Back to Top
HomeLithuania

# Lithuania

120 items

        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Press Availability with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis	  Uzra ZeyaNovember 19, 2021Vilnius, Lithuania 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Brussels and Vilnius	  November 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis	  September 15, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2021Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis	  August 21, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis	  August 13, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 10, 2021	  Ned PriceAugust 10, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Lithuania	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Lithuania	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Diversion of Ryanair Flight to Belarus and Arrest of Journalist	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 23, 2021 

previous page1…56789…12next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2784 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2784

 To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for federally 
  funded employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in 
  appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 1995

Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mr. Parker) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for federally 
  funded employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in 
  appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES FOR FEDERALLY 
              FUNDED EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 124 of Public Law 104-56 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Reimbursement to States.--If a State used State funds to 
continue carrying out a Federal program during the period beginning 
November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995, or if a State furloughed 
federally funded employees carrying out a Federal program during such 
period, the State shall be reimbursed for expenses that would have been 
paid by the Federal Government during such period had appropriations 
been available and for expenses that the State incurs if it reimburses 
such furloughed employees, together with interest theron as provided in 
section 6503(d) of title 31, United States Code. As used in this 
subsection, the term `State' has the meaning given such term by section 
6501(9) of such title.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``(a)'' and inserting ``(a)'' after ``124.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Antigua and Barbuda

58 items

        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Antigua and Barbuda	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Antigua and Barbuda	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Antigua and Barbuda	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Antigua and Barbuda	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Antigua and Barbuda Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Donation of 5.5 Million Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine to CARICOM Countries	  Ned PriceAugust 12, 2021 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
HomeResources for Programs and Grants...Burma Due Diligence Assessment

# 									Burma Due Diligence Assessment							

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

						Download FY 2020 Burma Due Diligence Assessment												[187 KB]

U.S. foreign assistance for Burma or Burmese beneficiaries is subject to restrictions. This includes restrictions, pursuant to section 7043(a)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2020 (Div. G, P.L. 116-94) (SFOAA), on funds appropriated under title III of the act for assistance for Burma.  Section 704(a)(3) provides that such funds “may not be made available to any organization or entity controlled by the armed forces of Burma, or to any individual or organization that advocates violence against ethnic or religious groups or individuals in Burma.”

Applicant organizations should be cognizant of these restrictions when developing project proposals as these restrictions will require appropriate due diligence vetting of program beneficiaries and collaboration with DRL to ensure compliance with these restrictions. Due diligence vetting in this context can be understood as any practice or process undertaken by a DRL grantee to collect and examine information on an individual or organization prior to the provision of funding or support in order to ascertain whether such assistance can be provided in light of the restrictions outlined in the first paragraph. Examples of due diligences practices can include conducting background checks on individuals and organizations against relevant sources in the public domain, consulting with local staff and other experts in the field, and other steps and processes by which a grantee investigates, monitors, and safeguards against the provision of assistance to prohibited individuals and/or organizations.

To gain a better understanding of an organization’s existing vetting practices and capabilities, applicant organizations are required to submit a one-page Burma Due Diligence Assessment outlining existing organizational vetting practices and experience conducting due diligence vetting in Burma or other country contexts. The assessment should discuss current practices, capacity and/or experience conducting and documenting open source vetting of program beneficiaries, existing organizational safeguards preventing the provision of funding or other forms of assistance to entities or individuals involved in human rights abuses, and experience working with donors on grant compliance.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

Back to Top
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #30, August 5 – 11, 2009 

An overall above average wet season for Afghanistan has 

given way to more seasonal dry weather during the summer. 

During the winter months an unusually deep snow pack built 

up. As temperatures began to warm during the spring months, 

as is typical, the snow began to melt. However, precipitation 

continued, causing numerous rain-on-snow events. These 

events are known to cause rapid snow melt. As a result many 

parts of Afghanistan reported flooding triggered by melt water. 

Snow pack now remains confined to the highest elevations of 

the northeast, as is typical for this time of year. 

During late June and continuing through July and into early 

August, above-normal temperatures prevailed across the 

lowlands of Afghanistan with cooler-than-normal temperatures 

in northeast Afghanistan. The cooler than normal 

temperatures have preserved more snow pack than is usual. 

During the next week, seasonal dry weather should be 

accompanied by above-normal temperatures in the lowlands 

(Figure 2). Maximum temperatures should exceed 45 °C 

across southern Afghanistan (Figure 3). 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Temperature Anomaly for August 3 - 10, 2009. 

 Source: COLA

Figure 3. Extreme Maximum Temperature (°C) for 

August 3 - 10, 2009.

Source: NOAA/CPC