alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report [electronicresource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:P 21/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000637480
 
September 17, 2019
HomePhilippines

# Philippines

195 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Manalo	  December 27, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea	  Matthew MillerDecember 10, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 5, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Terrorist Attack at Mindanao State University in the Philippines	  Matthew MillerDecember 3, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Philippines	  November 29, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		This Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Every Week, the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs Works to Build Sustainable Businesses Worldwide	  November 17, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States Signs Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with the Philippines 	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		New Partnership with the Philippines to Explore Semiconductor Supply Chain Opportunities	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Release of Philippine Former Senator De Lima	  Matthew MillerNovember 13, 2023 

previous page123456…20next page

Back to Top
#### § 592.314 Tamper-resistant container.

The term *tamper-resistant container* means packaging having an indicator or barrier to entry that could reasonably be expected to provide visible evidence that tampering had occurred. Standard mailing and express consignment packaging, or such packaging that simply contains a resealable plastic bag, is not considered to be a *tamper-resistant container.*

[83 FR 28373, June 19, 2018]
§ 598.511 Certain transactions for the expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property. ( a ) Specially designated narcotics traffickers are authorized to engage in the following transactions: ( 1 ) Making payment for and receiving goods and services for the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 598.202(a); and
( 2 ) Receiving and making funds transfers in furtherance of the authorized transactions set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section from unblocked funds originating outside the United States, provided that any funds received may not originate from any individual or entity whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute, other than the specially designated narcotics trafficker(s) who owns the property.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any person making payment for or receiving goods and services for the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 598.202(a) authorized by paragraph (a)(1) of this section must file a report on the transactions with OFAC within 30 days of the first transaction related to that property. Such reports shall include the following numbered sections and information: ( i ) Estimated or actual dollar value of the transaction(s), as determined by the value of the payment, goods, or services;
( ii ) A description of the blocked property;
( iii ) The parties involved;
( iv ) The type and scope of transactions conducted; and
( iv ) The dates and duration of the transactions.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC via email to *OFACReport@treasury.gov*.
[86 FR 26671, May 17, 2021, as amended at 89 FR 15743, Mar. 5, 2024]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
use of our report dated April 27, 2000, on the financial
statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. Employees' 401 (k) Plan,
which is incorporated by reference in VICORP Restaurants,
Inc.'s Form 10-K/A amendment dated February 22, 2000, to its
Form 10-K report for the year ended October 31,1999.  It
should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. subsequent to October
31, 1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
   April 27, 2000.
Exhibit 21

Registrant owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Harleysville National Bank and Trust Company, a national banking association headquartered at
483 Main Street, Harleysville, PA 19438, Citizens National Bank, a national banking association headquartered at 13-15 West Ridge Street, Lansford, PA 18232, Security National Bank, a
national banking association headquartered at One Security Plaza, Pottstown, PA 19464, HNC Financial Company, a Delaware Corporation headquartered at 2751 Centerville Road, Suite 3164, Wilmington,
Delaware 19808 and of HNC Reinsurance Company, an Arizona Corporation headquartered at 101 North First Avenue, Suite 2460, Phoenix, Arizona 85003.

73

---
#### Ann SHERIDAN et al., Appellants, v. Woody KAISER, Appellee.

No. 78-175.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1978.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan & O’Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.

Adams & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were defendants and third party plaintiffs in the trial court. Their appeal is from a summary final judgment for the third party defendant upon the appellants’ third party claim for indemnity or contribution.

The original complaint alleged that the appellants had procured and written a workmen’s compensation insurance policy for the plaintiff in which they negligently failed to include a specific provision requested. The third party claim by the appellants alleged that the appellee (third party defendant) was the referring broker and that he was negligent in failing to transmit the request for special coverage.

The evidentiary record before the trial court on the motion for summary final judgment shows genuine issues of material fact upon the disputed question of the extent of the plaintiff’s dealings with the two brokers and their responsibilities to the plaintiff under their referral arrangement. Accordingly, the summary final judgment is reversed upon authority of the rule stated in *Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co.,*191 So.2d 605, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

Reversed.
HomeRepublic of the Congo

# Republic of the Congo

64 items

        -    TIAS  		Congo, Republic of (04-0602) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  June 2, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Congo (02-912) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  September 12, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Republic of the (94-813) – Treaty Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment	  August 13, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Republic of (90-421) – Peace Corps Agreement	  April 21, 1990 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
# C_2005182EN.01004503.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/45

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-14/05 (1)

1

(2005/C 182/85)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 25 May 2005, the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-14/05, Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 69 of 19.3.2005.

1

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: February 28, 2005


By: /S/ Randall Jones
-----------------------------------
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Jean Heck Reed, Appellants, v. Richard L. JORDAN, Appellee (two cases).

Nos. 74-1513, 74-1609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 99-6532.

#### In re Reidt.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*

Justice Stevens dissents.

See *id.,*at 4, and cases cited therein.
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. J. R. WRIGHT, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

January 16, 1911.

1. INTOXICATING LIQUORS: Accomplice: Instructions. One who purchases liquor from an unlicensed vendor is not an accomplice and the defendant is not entitled to an instruction on that subject.

2: -: Habitual Drunkard: Impeachment^ A defendant being tried for selling intoxicating liquor without license, impeached the prosecuting witness by showing that he was an habitual drunkard, and the trial court gave an instruction requiring the jury to take the character of all the witnesses into consideration in passing upon their credibility. It was *held*that defendant could not complain of the refusal of an instruction calling special attention to the witness being a drunkard.

Appeal from Bates Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *O. A. Denton,*Judge.

Affirmed.

W. *O. Jackson*for appellant.

*W. B. Dawson*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

Defendant was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor in violation of the Local Option Law.

The witness relied upon by the state was the man to whom it is claimed defendant sold the liquor. Therefore, the point is .made that he was an accomplice, and an instruction was asked stating him to be, and directing the jury to receive his evidence with caution on that account. The instruction was properly refused. One who purchases liquor sold without the seller being licensed, is not an accomplice as that term is known to the law.

*511The witness was also shown to he an habitual drunkard. It was ruled in State v. Grant, 79 Mo. 113, that that fact could be shown by way of impeachment. But it was not error to refuse an instruction especially calling the attention of the jury to that fact, when an instruction was given on the credibility of any witness and informing them that they should take into consideration his character.

There was a question as to threats being made against the prosecuting witness, tending to cause him to testify against defendant; and inducements being held out to him for the same purpose. These were sufficiently covered by an instruction and we think leaves no legal ground of complaint.

No objection was made to the action of the prosecuting attorney in causing the defendant to turn his face to the jury and no ruling was made thereon.

We find ourselves without legal ground to interfere with the conviction, and hence affirm the judgment.

All concur.
694 A.2d 1098

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Christopher R. McFARLAND, Respondent.

No. 330 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 21, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 1997, there having been filed with this Court by Christopher R. McFarland his verified *89Statement of Resignation dated April 3, 1997, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Christopher R. McFarland be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
HomeIraq

# Iraq

416 items

        -    		Shane Louis  Stanfield	  January 23, 2007 
        -    		Arthur  Laguna	  January 23, 2007 
        -    		Ronald  Johnson	  January 23, 2007 
        -    		Casey  Casavant	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Arthur Laguna	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Ronald Johnson	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Steven Alfred Gernet	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Casey Casavant	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Shane Louis Stanfield	  January 23, 2007 
        -    DS Memorial  		Ronald David Hyatt, Jr.	  October 7, 2005 

previous page1…3435363738…42next page

Back to Top
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1981-2 Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001
1

NO. 03-14-00088-CR

03-14-00408-CR

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

DARIUS DONTAE LOVINGS § APPELLANT

VS. §

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLEE

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. D1-DC-12-301231 and D1-DC-12-203247

STATE'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

The State of Texas respectfully moves for an extension of the deadline for filing

the State’s brief and, in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.6 and

10.5(b), advises the Court as follows:

(a) Following his convictions for Murder and Aggravated Robbery, the

appellant filed his notice of appeal in the above causes on February 10, 2014, and June

18, 2014. Appellant’s counsel filed a brief on March 18, 2015.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00088-CR

4927260

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/17/2015 9:15:55 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/17/2015 9:15:55 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

(c) The State’s brief is currently due on April 17, 2015.

(c) This request is that the deadline for filing the State’s brief be extended by

30 days.

(d) The number of previous extensions of time granted for submission of the

State’s brief is: none.

(e) The State relies upon the following facts to reasonably explain the need

for an extension of the deadline:

1. During the period since this brief was filed, the attorney assigned to this case

has been working on other pressing appellate matters and has not had

sufficient time to prepare an adequate response to this brief.

2. This request is not made for the purpose of delay, but to ensure that the

Court has a proper State’s brief to aid in the just disposition of the above

cause.
3

WHEREFORE, the State of Texas respectfully requests that the deadline for

filing the State’s brief be extended to May 18, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEMARY LEHMBERG

District Attorney

Travis County, Texas

/s/ Kathryn A. Scales

Kathryn A. Scales

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No. 00789128

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

(512) 854-9400

Fax No. 854-4810

Kathryn.Scales@traviscountytx.gov

AppellateTCDA@traviscountytx.gov
4

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i), I hereby certify, based

upon the computer program used to generate this motion, that this motion contains

233 words, excluding words contained in those parts of the motion that Rule 9.4(i)

exempts from inclusion in the word count. I certify, further, that this motion is

printed in a conventional, 14-point typeface.

/s/ Kathryn A. Scales

Kathryn A. Scales

Assistant District Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on the 17th day of April, 2015, a true and correct copy of

this motion was served, by U.S. mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or electronically

through the electronic filing manager, to the Appellant’s attorney, Paul Evans,

Attorney at Law, 811 Nueces Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2215.

/s/ Kathryn A. Scales

Kathryn A. Scales

Assistant District Attorney
# Laos

76 items

        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Laos 	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Laos, Thailand, and Indonesia	  June 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Laos	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Lao New Year 2023	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 12, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Release of Japan-U.S.-Mekong Power Partnership Action Plan	  April 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Sison’s Travel to Madagascar, South Africa, Mauritius, Azerbaijan, Mongolia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Laos	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Laos	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Appointment of Sonexay Siphandone as Prime Minister of Laos	  Ned PriceJanuary 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Tenth Anniversary of Lao Civil Society Leader Sombath Somphone’s Disappearance	  Ned PriceDecember 15, 2022 

previous page1234…8next page

Back to Top
NO. SCWC-29210 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

CFI INC., a Hawaii Corporation, 

Respondent/Plaintiff/Appellant, 

vs. 

HAMAKUA COAST REALTY, INC., a Hawaii Corporation, 

and DENIS FERRARI, Respondents/Defendants/Appellees, 

and 

ERNEST B. TEXEIRA, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee 

and 

ALA KAI REALTY, INC.,a Hawaii Corporation, 

Respondent/Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, 

and 

TEX INC., a Hawaii Corporation, et al., 

Respondent/Defendant/Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(ICA NO. 29210; CIV. NO. 06-1-0380 (HILO)) 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29210

28-DEC-2011

11:12 AM
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit 

Court Judge Sakamoto, in place of Acoba, J., recused) 

 Petitioner/Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee 

Ernest B. Texeira’s amended petition for writ of certiorari, 

filed on November 23, 2011, is hereby rejected. 

 DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 28, 2011.

Nelson H. Kinoshita /s

for petitioner/ 

defendant-third-party /s

plaintiff/appellee on 

the petition. /s

 

Douglas L. Halsted, 

for respondent/plaintiff/ 

appellant on the opposition. 

/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

 

/s/ Karl K. Sakamoto
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cody L. DENTON et al.

No. 65469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 31, 1979.

In re Cody Denton, Walter Marshall, Charles Singletary, Danny Cannon, Benjamin Kelly, David Johnson and Jack Hutchinson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of La-fourche. No. 85,909.

Application granted in part and denied in part. Appeal bond of David Johnson reduced to $2500.00. Appeal bond of Jack Hutchinson reduced to $5,000.00. Applications of the remaining relators are denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report [electronicresource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:AR 5/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638311
 
September 11, 2019
HomePhilippines

# Philippines

183 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Readout on the Inaugural U.S.-Philippines 3+3 Meeting	  April 12, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Enrique Manalo, Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro, and Philippine National Security Advisor Eduardo M. Año Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 12, 2024Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		The United States, the Philippines, and Japan Launch the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Luzon Economic Corridor	  April 11, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		NSC Preview of the Japan State Visit and the U.S.-Japan-Philippines Trilateral Leaders’ Summit	  April 9, 2024Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 12:00 p.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Manalo	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea	  Matthew MillerMarch 23, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Vienna, Seoul, Manila, Jeddah, Cairo, and Tel Aviv	  Matthew MillerMarch 20, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Philippine President Marcos, Jr.	  March 19, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Philippines Relations	  March 18, 2024 

123…19next page

Back to Top
# Finland

170 items

        -    Report  		Finland	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Finland	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Finland	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Finland	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (16-928) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 28, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (15-220) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  February 20, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (14-421) – Agreement Relating to Scientific and Technological Cooperation	  April 21, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (13-501) – Defense Agreement Concerning Security of Information	  May 1, 2013 
        -    		Finland (12-801) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Crime	  August 1, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Finland (12-527) – Defense Agreement for Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation Projects	  May 27, 2012 

previous page1…14151617next page

Back to Top