898 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices 

the time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information. All existing 

ways will have to adjust to comply with 

any previously applicable instructions 

and requirements that have 

subsequently changed; train personnel 

to be able to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Owners and operators of other solid 

waste incineration units. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 0. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, 

annually and semiannually. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

0. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0. 

Changes in the Estimates: There are 

no changes in the total estimated burden 

as currently identified in the OMB 

Inventory of Approved Burdens. At 

present, there are no OSWI units that 

are currently subject to the regulations, 

and it is estimated that no new units are 

expected to be constructed or operated 

over the next three years. It is assumed 

that potential respondents would use 

alternative methods of waste disposal 

that are more economical, e.g. landfills, 

rather than replacing existing OSWI 

units. No respondent or agency burdens 

or costs have been estimated and no 

annual burden is expected. 

Dated: January 5, 2009. 

John Moses, 

Acting Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–206 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8589–4] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in the 

Federal Register dated April 6, 2008 (97 

FR 27647). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080380, ERP No. D–AFS– 

K65348–CA, Tahoe National Forest 

Motorized Travel Management, 

Implementation, Sierra Nevada 

Mountains, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, 

Sierra and Yuba Counties, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

continued use of routes in areas 

containing Naturally Occurring 

Asbestos and impacts to water quality, 

meadows, and riparian areas. To 

address these concerns, EPA 

recommends that the final EIS address 

current roads and trails with known 

impacts, eliminating the addition of 

routes on land ‘‘most likely’’ to contain 

naturally occurring asbestos, and detail 

on meeting TMDL requirements and 

monitoring and enforcement 

commitments. Rating EC2. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20080420, ERP No. F–BLM– 

K08066–CA, Sunrise Powerlink 

Transmission Line Project, Proposed 

Land Use Plan Amendment, 

Construction and Operation of a New 

91-mile 500 kilovolt (kV) Electric 

Transmission Line from Imperial 

Valley Substation (in Imperial Co. 

near the City of El Centro) to a New 

Central East Substation (in Central 

San Diego County) Imperial and San 

Diego Counties, CA. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about adverse 

impacts to water resources, air quality 

and the disclosure of costs and benefits 

associated with the various alternatives. 

EIS No. 20080467, ERP No. F–AFS– 

L65499–WA, The Summit at 

Snoqualmie Master Development Plan 

(MPD), Proposal to Ensure Long-Term 

Economic Viability, Mt. BakerSnoqualmie/Okanogan-Wenatchee 

National Forests, King and Kittitas 

Counties, WA. 

Summary: The Final EIS adequately 

addresses EPA’s environmental 

concerns about wetlands, water quality, 

and habitat conductively with 

mitigation and avoidance of significant 

impacts. Additionally, the Final EIS 

presents metrics for restoration 

outcomes and emphasizes the 

importance of meeting monitoring 

requirements. EPA has no concerns 

about the implementation of the 

proposed project. 

EIS No. 20080471, ERP No. F–AFS– 

J65518–SD, South Project Area, 

Proposes Multiple Resource 

Management Actions, Selected 

Alternative 3, Hell Canyon Ranger 

District, Black Hills National Forest, 

Custer County, SD. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

EIS No. 20080512, ERP No. F–USN– 

A11080–00, Atlantic Fleet Active 

Sonar Training Program, To Provide 

Mid- and High-Frequency Active 

Sonar Technology and the Improved 

Extended Echo Ranging (IEER) System 

during Atlantic Fleet Training 

Exercises, Along the East Coast of the 

United States (U.S.) and in the Gulf of 

Mexico. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

Dated: January 6, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–211 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8589–03] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental 

Impact Statements Filed 12/29/2008 

Through 01/02/2009 Pursuant to 40 CFR 

1506.9. 

EIS No. 20080543, Draft EIS, NRC, NY, 

Generic—License Renewal of Nuclear 

Plants, Supplement 38 to NUREG– 

1437, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear 

Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, 

Westchester County, NY, Comment 

Period Ends: 03/11/2009, Contact: 

Andrew Stuyvenberg 301–415–4006. 

EIS No. 20080544, Draft EIS, FHW, MO, 

MO–63 Corridor Improvement 

Project, To Correct Roadway 

Deficiencies, Reduce Congestion and 

Provide Continuity along the MO–63 

Corridor on the Existing Roadway and 

on New Location, Osage, Maries and 

Phelps Counties, MO, Comment 

Period Ends: 03/02/2009, Contact: 

Peggy Casey 573–636–7104. 

EIS No. 20090000, Final EIS, COE, FL, 

South Florida Water Management 

District (SFWMD) Project, Propose to 

Construct and Operate Stormwater 

Treatment Areas (STAs) on 

Compartments B and C of the 

Everglades Agriculture Area, U.S. 

Army COE Section 404 Permit, Palm 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES