alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           11190
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   475
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   988
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     148187
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           14254
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             14473
<LOANS>                                         223569
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  416298
<DEPOSITS>                                      289264
<SHORT-TERM>                                      7685
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              13919
<LONG-TERM>                                      72214
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                       31895
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  416298
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  10584
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4371
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 14961
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5515
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7743
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7218
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 586
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4090
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3005
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                        849
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3790
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4134
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      114
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4307
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4307
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           3227
        

</TABLE>
693 A.2d 583

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Ronald GIBSON, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 30, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 1997, it is ordered that petitioner’s Emergency Motion for a Stay of Execution pend*36ing the filing and resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The execution shall be stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court on the petition for certiorari from this Court’s ruling in *Commonwealth v. Gibson,*547 Pa. 71, 688 A.2d 1152 (1997).
#### § 590.313 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
# Indonesia

201 items

        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Indonesia	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Indonesia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Indonesia	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Indonesia	  March 11, 2020 
        -    		POWER Project Pipeline	   
        -    Report  		2019 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 7, 2019 
        -    Report  		Indonesia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Indonesia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Indonesia	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Indonesia	  April 19, 2019 

previous page1…1415161718…21next page

Back to Top
§ 546.513 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates, and the extraction, processing, transport, sale, or distribution of water in Sudan. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to Sudan or to persons in third countries purchasing specifically for resale to Sudan, or to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use, are authorized.
( b ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the extraction, processing, transport, sale, or distribution of water, including the maintenance or repair of water pipelines, are authorized.
( c ) For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* Agricultural commodities are products: ( i ) That fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use in Sudan as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* Medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* A medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 546.513 :
This general license does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[89 FR 15750, Mar. 5, 2024]
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reportshave been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; Torchlight Loan Services, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; and KeyBank NationalAssociation. 

Date:    November 27, 2019 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 
CGCMT 2017-P7 Certifications (2018) 

**
EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section
      13
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of Security Capital
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Connie
      Woods Hawkins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








BY  /s/
                Connie Woods HawkinsName:  Connie
                Woods HawkinsTitle:  Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:  August
                8, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of
      this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital
      Corporation and will be retained
      by Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### HEAT COOL, INC., Appellant, v. Edward H. STEIN and Dolores M. Stein, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 561.332 Aluminum sector of Iran.

The term *aluminum sector of Iran* means the mining, refining, processing, or manufacturing of aluminum or aluminum products in Iran.

[84 FR 38547, Aug. 7, 2019]
# C_2005183EN.01000201.xml

| 26.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3836 — Goldman Sachs/Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Energia/Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Telecom)

(2005/C 183/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3836. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3836. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Germany, Belgium

# 									Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to Germany, Belgium							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 11, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Mallory Stewart will travel to Garmisch, Germany, and Brussels, Belgium, May 13-18.

In Garmisch, Assistant Secretary Stewart will provide keynote remarks at the Senior Executive Seminar at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies.  She will also participate in roundtable discussions and sessions with fellows and faculty.

In Brussels, Assistant Secretary Stewart will meet with NATO and EU officials on a range of issues, including on arms control and outer space security.  Additionally, she will lead discussions about key arms control and emerging technology issues to advance Allied security and deterrence.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBelgiumBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsGermanyOffice of the SpokespersonSecuritySpaceTravel

Back to Top
#### HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d/b/a University Community Hospital, Petitioner, v. Jo Ann LAWYER and Claude Lawyer, and Doctor Crile Doscher and Doctor Cora Sue Golden, Respondents.

No. 78-988.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 22, 1978.

Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Arthur N. Cohen of Cohen & Kokus, Miami, for plaintiffs/respondents.

Watson, Hubert & Davis, Fort Lauder-dale, for defendants/respondents.

*849MOORE, Judge.

This is a petition for writ of common law certiorari seeking review of the final decision of a medical mediation panel which was formed and conducted its proceedings pursuant to Section 768.44, Florida Statutes. We issued our rule to show cause to which the respondents filed a response. After numerous other pleadings the matter is now before us for final decision.

In *Ans v. Pagnotti,*362 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) this Court adopted the reasoning contained in *Hubacher v. Landry,*360 So.2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) and dismissed a similar petition for writ of certio-rari which sought review on evidentiary grounds of the decision of a medical mediation panel. On the basis of *Ans, supra,*and *Hubacher, supra,*we determine that petitioner has failed to demonstrate jurisdiction in this Court for review by common law certiorari of a decision of a medical mediation panel.

We therefore dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR REVISION TO THE 2007 STA TE STRATEGY SIP SUBMITTAL MAY 2009

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – Criteria for Determining the Completeness

of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's Designee X See letter addressed to Ms. Laura Yoshii from Mr. James N. Goldstene 2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X See ARB Board Resolu tion 09-34 2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Board Re solution 09-34 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan b: Contingency Measures Not applicable
2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements X See ARB Board Resolution 09-34 2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 X See Notice of Public Hearing published March 24, 2009 and Statement of Kurt Karperos Regarding Public Notice 2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in Accordance with Notice X See ARB Board Resolution 09-34 2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses X See 3 submitted public comments

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable. 2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status N ot applicable.
2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable. 2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS Not applicable.
2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,596,000
<SECURITIES>                                22,154,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,772,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (546,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    237,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               303,000
<PP&E>                                      17,470,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,834,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,661,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,643,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       511,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,756,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,661,000
<SALES>                                        870,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,854,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,141,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,747,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,724,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,724,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,724,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Amos M. Lyon, Respondent, *against*The New York, Susquehanna, & Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

[Special Term.]

(Decided May 4th, 1888.)

Under the provisions of chapter 435 of the Laws of 1887 for appeals to the Court of Appeals from, judgments and orders of this court, in cases originating in the City Court of New York, no judgment is to he entered in this court, for the purpose of such appeal, on affirmance of a judgment of the City Court; that act does .not amend or alter the provisions of the Code regulating the practice on appeals from the -City Court to this court (Code Civ. Pro., §§ 3194, 3195).

Motion for an order directing the clerk to enter judgment.

The action was brought in the City Court of New York, and plaintiff recovered a judgment therein, which, on appeal by defendant, was - affirmed by the General Term of that court. On appeal by defendant from that decision, it was affirmed by this court (See 14 Daly 489). Plaintiff applied to the clerk of this court for the entry of judgment in his favor thereon, and upon the clerk refusing to enter such judgment, plaintiff made this motion.

*Abbett &*Fuller, for the motion.

*Vanderpoel, Green, Cuming, Goodwin,*opposed.

Bookstaver, J.

The motion is based on chapter 435 of the Laws of 1887, providing for appeals to the Court of Appeals-from judgments and orders of - this court in cases originating in the City Court. This law amends subdivision 2 of section. 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure, repeals a portion of chapter 418-of the Laws of 1886, and declares the meaning and intent of that part of the act not repealed. But it in no way amends *6or alters sections 3194 and 3195 of the Code, which regulate the practice on appeals from the city court to this court. Section 3194 expressly provides that the judgment or order of this court must be remitted to the court below to be enforced according to law; and section 3195 provides that, upon an appeal to the Court of Appeals, the notice of appeal and undertaking must be filed with the clerk of the city court, who must transmit the necessary papers to the Court of Appeals. If the judgment were to be entered in this court it could not be remitted to the City Court, nor could the clerk of that court transmit the papers to the Court of Appeals, as directed by these provisions of the Code, which are now in forcé. It would be an anomaly in practice to have one judgment entered in this court for purposes of appeal to the Court of Appeals, and another in the same action in the City Court, for the purpose of being enforced for the collection of the debt. Nor do I see any countenance for such practice in the law under consideration.'

The motion must, therefore, be denied, but, under the circumstances, without costs.

Motion denied.