alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/  THOMAS W. BURGHART

Thomas W. Burghart
Vice President and Treasurer
November 14, 2002
#### § 800.230 Lead agency.

The term *lead agency* means the Department of the Treasury and any other agency designated by the Chairperson of the Committee to have primary responsibility, on behalf of the Committee, for the specific activity for which the Chairperson designates it as a lead agency, including all or a portion of an assessment, a review, an investigation, or the negotiation or monitoring of a mitigation agreement or condition.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201 O-NM~054-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a s:ubstantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where 3vi1at10nmight be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 501.721 Hearings to be public.

All hearings, except hearings on applications for confidential treatment filed pursuant to § 501.725(b), shall be public unless otherwise ordered by the Administrative Law Judge or the Secretary's designee, as appropriate, on his or her own motion or the motion of a party.
Order filed, April 04, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00243-CV

____________

MILAGROS D. GUGLIUZZA, Appellant

V.

CHARLES JOHN GUGLIUZZA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-73819

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 17, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Benjamin Alva, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00165-CR

BRIAN LEE SPORN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 43rd District 

Court

of Parker County (CR16-0651)

June 6, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
#### Elvin ALVES and Alicia Alves, Appellants, v. ADLER BUILT INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, North Causeway Townhouses, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Morton Adler, Individually, Appellees.

Nos. 77-1363, 77-1364, 78-45 and 78-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 9, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1979.

*803Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, Robert Sussman, Hialeah, for appellants.

Prates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman & Greer and Scott D. Sheftall; Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith & Spangler; Adams & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Miami, Sidney B. Shapiro, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals question the propriety of three summary judgments in a negligence action. Joyce Alves, a two-year-old child, drowned while playing in and about a sand pile adjacent to a lake on property next to her parents’ home.

We affirm because the negligence of the defendants, if any (which we do not rule upon), was not the proximate cause of the accident. The negligence on the part of the parents in failing to properly supervise the two-year-old child, when they were on notice of the propensity of the child to play in and about the sand pile, was the proximate cause of her demise.1*Orefice v. Albert,*237 So.2d 142 (Fla.1970); *Perotta v. Tri-State Insurance Company,*317 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); 59 Am.Jur.2d, Parent and Child, § 14.

In view of our ruling as to the proximate cause being a bar to this action, the other points raised in the several briefs have not been considered. Therefore, the summary judgments here under review are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

KEHOE, J., dissents.

1

. Chuck K. Davis (the construction superintendent) took the child home on at least one occasion and gave her to her mother. Vincent Pepe (the watchman) took her home a couple of times and told the people the child was near the water. Bertram M. McCall (a laborer) took her home from the site on at least two or three occasions.
# Equatorial Guinea

51 items

        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Equatorial Guinea	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Equatorial Guinea	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Equatorial Guinea	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Equatorial Guinea	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Equatorial Guinea	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  July 19, 2018 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
# MONRO E REGIONA L AIRPOR T

OPERATE D B Y CIT Y O F MONRO E JAME S MAYO , Mayo r CLEV E NORRELL , Airpor t Directo r 540 0 OPERATION S ROA D TERMINA L BLDG , ROO M 20 0 MONROE , LOUISIAN A 7120 3 PHONE : 318-329-246 0 FAX : 318-329-259 9 March 11 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymond H
. LaHoo d Secretar y U.S
. Departmen

t ofTransportatio n ' 120 0 Ne w Jersey Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-lB I Dea r Mr
. Secretary : Than k yo u fo r th e opportunit

y to expres s m

y suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y and propose d join t

busines s agreemen

t filed by America

n Airline s an

d Japa n Airlines
. Th e propose d allianc e between thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo r one-worl d t o compet

e effectivel

y wit h th e Sta r and Sky-Tea

malliance
. Thi s increase d inter-allianc e competitio n will in tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f

th e Department' s Ope

n Skie s polic y - first

by solidifying U.S.-Japa

n Ope n Skies , the n by servin g a s afoundatio n fo r fiirther liberalizatio n acros s Asia
. Afte r athoroug h review , I encourag e th e Departmen t ofTransportatio n to approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

woul d enabl e thes e one-worl d allianc e airline s to wor k closely togethe

r to delive r highly competitiv e air

transportatio n services
. Approva l fo r AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e a positiv e impac t

o n air trave l by offerin

g customer s mor

e service , schedulin g an

d pricin g option s an d wil l help t o ensur

e tha t customer s continu e to benefi t fi-omhavin g thre e competitiv e air alliance s to choos e from. I urg e you to quickly approv e thi s ^plication
. Sincerely ,
Clcv e ^orrel l Manage r Monro e Regiona

l Airpor t CN:g g e-mail : Cleve.Norrell@ci.monroe.la.u s
# C_2005178EN.01001301.xml

| 20.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3837 — Thiel Logistik/Mondi/Proxar)

(2005/C 178/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3837. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3837. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
- Serr
Pens ma

NOS SEAMAP SERIES
NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN

naronaL 13. DEPARTMENT OF COM
ua DEAT Or OoaMeRCE
sat HEME ADHINGETRATION

NATIONA’ ° ee,

13242-12G

LAMBERT CONFORMAL

iC PROJECTION

(Starciard Paculiale 43° anct47*)
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lawrence ADAMS, Jr. v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65692.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1979.

In re Lawrence Adams, Jr., applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 251 — 468.

Writ denied.
#### Ronald RIDGE, Appellant, v. Norman RADEMACHER and Hazel Rademacher, Appellees.

No. 81-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 18, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1981.

Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg & Howland and Miguel A. Orta, North Miami, for appellant.

Michael Lechtman, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ, and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that an unsworn statement1 to a municipal police officer in regard to an alleged crime is not accorded an absolute privilege which will bar, as a matter of law, a subsequent action for slander based on such a statement, particularly when it is alleged to have been maliciously made. Such a statement partakes of a qualified privilege and is a mixed question of law and fact, depending on the actual malice established. *Hartley & Parker v. Copeland,*51 So.2d 789 (Fla.1951); *Axelrod v. Califano,*357 So.2d 1048 (Fla.1st DCA 1968); *Glynn v. City of Kissimmee,*383 So.2d 774 (Fla.5th DCA 1980).

Therefore, the final order dismissing the last amended complaint is reversed, with *1313directions to require an answer by the defendants within an appropriate time.2

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

1

. Pleadings or sworn statements in judicial proceedings may be “absolute”. *Coogler v. Rhodes,*38 Fla. 240, 21 So. 109 (1897); *Fiore v. Rogero,*144 So.2d 99 (Fla.2d DCA 1962); *McNayr v. Kelly,*184 So.2d 428 (Fla.1966); *Farish v. Wakeman,*385 So.2d 2 (Fla.4th DCA 1980). Unsworn statements in legislative and executive proceedings may also be “absolute”. *Robertson v. Industrial Insurance Company,*75 So.2d 198 (Fla.1954); *McNayr v. Kelly,*Supra;*Stone v. Rosen,*348 So.2d 387 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Kribs v. City of Boynton Beach,*372 So.2d 195 (Fla.4th DCA 1979); *Mueller v. The Florida Bar,*390 So.2d 449 (Fla.4th DCA 1980); *Kohn v. Davis,*390 So.2d 1246 (Fla.1st DCA 1980).

2

. This opinion and decision will not foreclose the trial court, upon an appropriate motion, from considering either the entry of a summary judgment in favor of the defendants or a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs case, in the event that the record in either of such instance will not permit the plaintiff to go forward.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- EXBS Program

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Export Control Cooperation

# Office of Export Control Cooperation

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Export Control Cooperation is the U.S. Government’s premier provider of assistance to foreign governments to ensure strategic trade control systems meet international standards and by engaging on bilateral, regional and multilateral levels with foreign governments to aid in the establishment of independent capabilities to regulate transfers of weapons of mass destruction, WMD-related items, conventional arms, and related dual-use items, and to detect, interdict, investigate, and prosecute illicit transfers of such items.				

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the  Quarter  ended  January 31, 1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         471
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (997)
<INVENTORY>                                    38,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,724
<PP&E>                                         28,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,525
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       123
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,717
<SALES>                                        54,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,491
<CGS>                                          41,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               134
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,419)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,960)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)
        


</TABLE>
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Medical Services...Office of the Executive Director

# Office of the Executive Director

## 				Our Mission			

					The goal of the Executive Director’s office is to effectively manage MED’s financial resources, to provide full logistical support domestically and overseas, provide human resource support and oversight, and to closely monitor and manage Medical Information Technology .				

Back to Top
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130080 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver (63) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130080 COA: 256302 Wayne CC: 04-002106-01 CHRISTOPHER DARNELL MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of April 28, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

l0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
#### § 560.309 [Reserved]
HomeDemocratic Republic of the Congo

# Democratic Republic of the Congo

146 items

        -    TIAS  		Congo, Democratic Republic of the (08-830) – Agreement Regarding the Status of United States Personnel Who May Be Temporarily Present in the Democratic Republic of Congo	  August 30, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Democratic Republic of the (05-1223) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  December 23, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Democratic Republic of the (03-1008) – Agreement Concerning the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  October 8, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Democratic Republic of the (03-722.2) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  July 22, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Republic of (12859) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  May 23, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		Congo, Democratic Republic of the (89-728) – Treaty on Protection of Investment	  July 28, 1989 

previous page1…131415

Back to Top
Document

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of March 4, 2021 by and between Gregory J. Hayes (the “Executive”) and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (formerly known as United Technologies Corporation) (the “Company”).


WHEREAS the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on June 9, 2019, which became effective as of April 3, 2020 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS the parties desire to enter into this Amendment to effect changes to the Employment Agreement as set forth herein;


NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed as follows:    


1.Paragraph 4(c) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


(c)           Long-Term Incentive and Equity Awards. Executive shall be eligible to receive equity and other long-term incentive awards under any applicable plan adopted by the Company during the Term for which employees are generally eligible. The amount, form, and terms and conditions of Executive’s annual equity awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee and the form and terms and conditions of Executive’s annual equity awards will be no less favorable than those applicable to equity awards granted to any other executive officer of the Company.


2.Section (v) of Paragraph 5(e) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


(v)     (A) reducing Executive’s annual bonus incentive opportunity as described in Section 4(b), or (B) a diminution in the Executive’s target annual long-term incentive opportunity from the level in effect as of immediately prior to the signing of this Agreement on June 9, 2019 or a material breach by the Company of Section 4(c);


Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  










[Signature page follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION






By /s/ Dantaya M. Williams                      
     Dantaya M. Williams    
     Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Gregory J. Hayes                                  
Gregory J. Hayes
















[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]
HomeBiographies...Luis  Coronado

# 				Luis  Coronado			

															Chief Information Officer 						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				January 3, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
Exhibit 21  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES  SUBSIDIARIES OF HUDSON
UNITED BANCORP:  Hudson United Bank,
organized under New Jersey business laws  HUBCO Capital Trust I, a
Delaware statutory business trust  HUBCO Capital Trust II, a
Delaware statutory business trust  JBI Capital Trust I, a
Delaware statutory business trust  Jefferson Delaware, Inc.
a service corporation for payment of JBI Capital Trust  Hudson United Capital
Trust I, a Delaware statutory business trust  Hudson United Capital
Trust II, a Delaware statutory business trust  SUBSIDIARIES OF HUDSON
UNITED BANK:  HUB Mortgage Investments,
Inc., organized under New Jersey business laws, indirectly through Hendrick
Hudson Corp.  NJ Investments of
Delaware, Inc., organized under Delaware business laws  Hendrick Hudson Corp. of
New Jersey, organized under New Jersey business laws  Lafayette Development
Corp., organized under New Jersey business laws  Plural Realty, Inc.,
organized under New York business laws  PSB Associates, Inc.,
organized under New York business laws  AMBA Realty Corporation,
organized under Connecticut banking laws  Riverdale Timber Ridge,
Inc., organized under New York business laws  Hudson Trader Brokerage
Services, organized under New York business laws  Hudson Insurance Services
Inc., organized under New Jersey business laws  Flatiron Credit Company,
Inc, organized under Delaware business laws  United Gasco, LLC,
organized under New Jersey business laws  UC Investments, Inc,
organized under New Jersey business laws
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of B2Digital, Inc., (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Russell, Chief
Executive Officer and Marcia Pearlstein, Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Robert Russell
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Robert Russell
                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                  /s/ Marcia Pearlstein
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Marcia Pearlstein
                                  Interim Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 18, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.