alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 598.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal suit or proceeding commenced or pending prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
HomeTunisia

# Tunisia

101 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with President Saied of Tunisia	  December 14, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 13, 2022	  Ned PriceDecember 13, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Announces $60 Million in Rapid Assistance to Support Vulnerable Tunisian Families	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 13, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Tunisia, Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, and Iraq  	  September 4, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Tunisia, Israel, the West Bank, and Jordan	  August 31, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 30, 2022	  Vedant PatelAugust 30, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Tunisia’s July 25 Referendum	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Tunisia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 26, 2022	  Ned PriceJuly 26, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 25, 2022	  Ned PriceJuly 25, 2022Washington, DC 

previous page123456…11next page

Back to Top
#### TRIDICO ELECTRIC PHONOGRAPH COMPANY v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Joseph N. Traigle, Director.

No. 10067.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1975.

Robert R. Rainer, Baton Rouge, for State of La., Dept, of Revenue.

Sidney L. Shushan, New Orleans, for Tridico Elec. Phonograph Co.

Before SARTAIN, ELLIS and de la HOUSSAYE, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

This case is consolidated with the case of Barbin et al. v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Revenue, Joseph N. Traigle, Director, La.App., 307 So.2d 140. For the reasons therein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with defendant to pay all costs for which it may be liable under law.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (289)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,218
<PP&E>                                          16,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,586)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,369
<BONDS>                                          6,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,194
<SALES>                                         36,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,226
<CGS>                                           23,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    120
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                114
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (375)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
# Bahrain

107 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahraini Crown Prince-Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa	  March 16, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Coordinated Actions with Bahrain against Supporters of Al-Ashtar Brigades	  Matthew MillerMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahrain’s King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa	  January 10, 2024 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Blinken’s Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 10, 2024Manama, Bahrain 
        -    Press Statement  		Bahrain National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bahrain	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to the Middle East	  November 14, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Kristen Welker of NBC’s Meet the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 22, 2023Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahraini Crown Prince-Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa	  October 13, 2023 

123…11next page

Back to Top
#### Albert L. SECADA, Appellant, v. Irene G. SECADA, Appellee.

No. 80-1497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 19, 1981.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Mallory H. Horton, Miami, for appellant.

Aronovitz & Weksler and Anne-Lise Gus-tafson, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); *Colucci*v. *Colucci,*392 So.2d 577 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); *Rosen v. Rosen,*386 So.2d 1268 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), *pet. for rev. den.,*392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981).
—ane (GULF OF MEXICO
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP EWING BANK

a

»
io t av * Son
-

ne sternaes satay batecusty wm wtyted fa 0 Vonont Sue Pobbsnnd ot Washagpen
fay Pessenpethonrs hyo yai fete euehy bnyvepend sre fret US, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE EWING BANK
= Prov teed Roncecer toeenraey NAHCrdaL SOLANIC AND ATMCSENTEIC ADMAENESTRATION
tee aed ct dom oF Me Roregyy [ht ee a me se NATIONAL OCEar SUNEY NOS NH 15-12
at 1978
(oes hain hae 1 AI sd Nas he eee

EATHEWETIIS CONMOUE ETEEVALE. 1 METERS [O75 UETH DERM
KPPLEMDNTED EF 7 METER IVTERVALS THENCE SC METERS TO MAR
imum DEPT SURRY WF I MATT TERS

bach a atest ns oe pe Hs a te ped sad m
Phe prernes never tote pet = rok sompeted y e Remee of Lome ne
Smo Neary lowe paket Les wf in Ontr Corsren Sael Ook Remacioe Charen
Ths cack cnan en aa a mot A) Fee! ven Beene. tr ws corp wt me
0 SO Dhow Nemow Sages evenia nen be bere 6! ane Vanmgeas

+—
DATUM Gur COAST ww wate pa

RasehetIGt MOHCATOR MEDLRCTON.
, Sede Lasmian6
#### Andrés Quintana Reyes, Plaintiff and Appellant, *v.*The Capital of Puerto Rico, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 6970.

Argued May *24, 1937.*

Decided November 26, 1937.

*Andrés Quintana Reyes*by his own right; *Juan Valide juli Rodriguez*for appellee; *Antonio L. López*as *amicus curiae.*

*349Mr. Justice Wolf

delivered the opinion of the Court.

ON MOTION POE EEHEAEING-

The appellant, among other reasons alleged for the reconsideration of our judgment, maintains that we failed to discuss the fifth assignment of error, relating to the ordered cancellation of the title of Cipriano Manrique, grantor of plaintiff-appellant, as follows:

> “The lower court also erred acting unjustly, with bias and partiality when it deprived Cipriano Manrique Gil, who has not been a party to the suit and has not been given his day in court, of his right to maintain the record of the title to the property acquired in good faith and according to law, thereby violating the constitutional provision contained in Section 2 of our Organic Act and the positive provision of Section 82 and the last paragraph of Section 83 of the Mortgage Law and the numerous, constant and uninterrupted jurisprudence of this Court on this matter and which we will point out in the course of the argument of this error.”

The brief of appellant was very lengthy and incorporated a lot of matter extraneous to a brief, and in the final analysis the omission was not vital. Let us see.

 In the first place, it would be Cipriano Manrique who could more properly complain of the omission to make Mm a party and if be bad any rights which were lost by reason of the cancellation, the judgment in this suit would not be binding upon him.

At the hearing Quintana Reyes contended, if we understood him, that if the record *(inscripción)*in favor of Manrique was not cancelled, he, Quintana, would have a right to build up a title on the title of Manrique; that if the latter was sued he might put forth arguments that would have supported his own title and, hence, the claim of Quintana. As a witness he had that opportunity or Quintana might have developed it.

There was another opportunity that Quintana had, and that was to have called on his alleged vendor in warranty of the conveyed title *(saneamiento y evicción).*He did not take *350this step, and-under Section 1370 of the Civil Code, 1930 ed., that failure would relieve Manrique of any liability on his warranty of title.

We are of the necessary opinion that all the rights of Manrique and especially any rights of action or defense became merged in Quintana. What the registry contained was only records in the latter’s favor. Therefore, the municipality had the right to ask for a cancellation of all the records, subsequent to that of its own original vendor, De la Cruz, that militated against the said municipality.

The other grounds presented to ns in the motion for reconsideration have been sufficiently discussed in our main opinion of March 5, 1937.

The motion for reconsideration is denied.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this motion.
693 A.2d 198

#### Catherine Baker KNOLL, Pennsylvania State Treasurer and Member of the State Workers’ Insurance Board, Appellant v. Johnny J. BUTLER, Secretary of Labor and Industry and Chairman of the State Workers’ Insurance Board; Linda Kaiser, Insurance Commissioners and Member of the State Workers’ Insurance Board; MSB Holding Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation; KSB Holding Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation; and Royal Bank of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania chartered banking institution, Appellees.

No. 79 M.D. APP.1996.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 28, 1997.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

Madame Justice NEWMAN did not participate in this matter.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2804

To amend the auto theft provisions of title 49, United States Code, to

add air bag modules to the list of major auto parts protected under

such provisions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCOLLUM) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the auto theft provisions of title 49, United States

Code, to add air bag modules to the list of major auto

parts protected under such provisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AIR BAG MODULES.

4 Section 33101(6) of title 49, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (K) and

7 (L) as subparagraphs (L) and (M), respectively; and

8 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (J) the fol9 lowing:
2

•HR 2804 IH

1 ‘‘(K) each air bag module;’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 11, 2014

p0604 

# Order

Clerk June 11, 2014

148971

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148971

COA: 312364

Oakland CC: 2012

- 241272

- FH

ROBERT TUTTLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a registered qualifying patient under

the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq ., who makes

unlawful sales of marijuana to another patient to whom he is not conn ected through the

registration process, taints all aspects of his marijuana

- related conduct, even that which is

otherwise permitted under the act; (2) whether a defendant’s possession of a valid

registry identification card establishes any presumption for purposes of § 4 or § 8; (3) if

not, what is a defendant’s evidentiary burden to establish immunity under § 4 or an

affirmative defense under § 8; and (4) what role, if any, do the verification and

confidentiality provisions in § 6 of the act play in establ ishing entitlement to immunity

under § 4 or an affirmative defense under § 8.

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Hartwick (Docket No.

1484 44).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Commemorating LGBTQI+ Pride Month

# 									Commemorating LGBTQI+ Pride Month							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 1, 2024

Every June, the United States celebrates Pride Month, commemorating the uprising at the Stonewall Inn that catalyzed a global movement toward LGBTQI+ equality and the inception of Pride as many of us know it today.  Despite great strides for equality around the world, LGBTQI+ persons in many countries continue to face grave danger, including laws criminalizing LGBTQI+ persons and their allies, violent attacks, and denial of lifesaving and gender-affirming treatment.

Protecting the spirit of Pride and honoring the legacy of the intrepid activists at Stonewall and subsequent generations of LGBTQI+ activists fighting for a more just world is central to the work we do. The Department of State is committed to promoting respect for the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons around the world. We will continue to work to defend LGBTQI+ persons so they can enjoy their human rights and fundamental freedoms and live full lives without fear.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Thailand

# 									Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Thailand							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 19, 2023

Counselor Derek Chollet and an interagency delegation will travel to Indonesia and Thailand March 20-24. During his travel, Counselor Chollet will engage with senior government leaders and key stakeholders on bilateral and regional issues, including efforts to address the worsening crisis in Burma and to seek peaceful and just resolution rooted in the will of the people of Burma.

In Jakarta, Counselor Chollet will meet with senior Indonesian government officials to discuss the U.S.-Indonesia Strategic Partnership and reiterate our shared commitment to cooperating on economic, security, and energy initiatives. He will also discuss Indonesia’s objectives as the ASEAN chair this year, and highlight United States’ commitment to ASEAN centrality, a free and open Indo-Pacific, and support for the security and prosperity of our partners.

In Bangkok, Counselor Chollet will meet with senior Thai government officials to underscore the United States’ deep commitment to the U.S.-Thailand alliance. He will discuss how we can strengthen bilateral cooperation on a range of issues, including reaffirming ASEAN centrality, expanding health and climate cooperation, and strengthening cooperation to achieve peace in Burma.

Counselor Chollet looks forward to engaging with government and civil society leaders, non-governmental organizations, and youth leaders in both nations to advance our people-to-people ties and uphold our commitment to democracy and human rights.

For media inquiries please contact EAP-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaDemocracyHuman RightsIndonesiaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPartnershipsSecurityThailand

Back to Top
§ 6.9 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization, or cooperative association must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 6.4(f)) when the proceeding was initiated. In the case of national banking associations, “net worth” shall be considered to be the total capital and surplus as reported, in conformity with the applicable instructions and guidelines, on the bank's last Consolidated Report of Condition filed before the initiation of the underlying proceeding.
( b ) The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this part. The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
#### Alice Stokes, Respondent, *v.*Albert Behrenes, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

April, 1898.)

Election of remedies, as between false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. • ' . '

Where a complaint contains all the allegations necessary to sustain an action for false imprisonment ,as well as one for malicious prosecution, the defendant- may compel the plaintiff -to elect upon which cause of action he intends to rely.

• Appeal from an order denying a motion requiring plaintiff to state separately the two causes of action set -forth in the complaint and to elect which of them he will rely upon in this case.

Herbert J. Hindes, for appellant.

Charles I. Schampain, for respondent.

Conlan, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made on behalf of the defendant, requiring the plaintiff to state the two causes of action set forth in the complaint separately and to elect which of the two causes of .'action set forth in the com: plaint,—- false imprisonment or taahcious prosecution — he will rely upon in this case.- .

The complaint contains all the necessary allegations to- sustain án action for false imprisonment or for malicious prosecution, and as the two causes of action were inconsistent the court should direct an election. This may ¡be done on the trial or by motipn before answer. Cassidy v. Daly, 11 Week. Dig. 222; Tuthill v. Skidmore, 124 N. Y. 148.

*443The defendant followed the latter practice, and his motion should have been granted. Order reversed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Oh. J., concm’s.

Order reversed, with costs.
Summary of Fiscal Year 2013 Executive Officer Base Salaries



 Exhibit 10.11 
 FISCAL YEAR 2013 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BASE SALARIES 
 The Company’s executive officers
are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 in their current positions: 
  

					
	 Name/Title
	  	FY2013
Salary	 
	 David L. Martin

President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	 	$500,000	  
	 Laurence L. Betterley

Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	$321,090	  
	 Robert J. Thatcher

Executive Vice President
	  	 	$303,188	  
	 James E. Flaherty

Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary
	  	 	$286,650	  
	 Paul Koehn

Vice President of Quality and Operations
	  	 	$288,750	  
	 Kevin Kenny

Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing
	  	 	$288,750
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-30265

Colby Dranoel Leonard, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public 

Safety and Corrections; Cranford Jordan, Louisiana 

Sheriff Association; James Keith Deville, Warden, 

Winn Correctional Center; David Yount, Education 

Director, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:22-CV-369

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Colby Leonard, Louisiana inmate # 536844, appeals the dismissal of 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Leonard alleges

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 14, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-30265 Document: 00516543333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2022
No. 22-30265

2

that the defendants deprived him of his constitutional right to pursue 

educational and vocational opportunities while incarcerated. The magistrate 

judge’s report rightly concluded that “a state has no constitutional obligation 

to provide basic educational or vocational training to prisoners.” Beck v. 

Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 759, 762 (5th Cir. 1988).

Leonard’s appeal is without arguable merit and, therefore, is 

DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th 

Cir.1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal counts as a “strike” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387–88 (5th 

Cir.1996). Leonard is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes he may 

not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is 

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of 

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Case: 22-30265 Document: 00516543333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2022