alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.10.5





 Exhibit 10.10.5 

AMENDMENT #3 
 TO

 PROJECT RIDER #1 

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment
#3 to Project Rider #1 (“Amendment #3”) is entered into effective as of the date of the final signature executing this Amendment #3 (“Amendment #3 Effective Date”) by and between Magenta Therapeutics, Inc.
(“Magenta”) and National Marrow Donor Program d/b/a Be The Match Biotherapies (“BTMB”) (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Parties executed a Collaboration Agreement, effective November 10, 2017 and a Project Rider, effective December 6, 2017 (as amended by
that certain Amendment #1, effective December 6, 2018 and Amendment #2, effective November 13, 2019, “Project Rider #1”); and 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the Term and Payment Schedule of the Project Rider #1. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for the valuable consideration contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, Magenta and BTMB agree to the following amendment as
follows: 
 Amendment to Project Rider #1 
  

	1.	 Delete the Payment Schedule in Section D. Compensation of BTMB of Project Rider #1 in its
entirety and replace it with the following to read as follows: 


 PAYMENT SCHEDULE 

 

			
	For Services provided by BTMB during Calendar Year 2021 (January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021), Magenta
will pay BTMB a fixed price quarterly payment of $17,500.	  	 BTMB will invoice
$17,500 every January 15th for consulting services occurring during the period commencing January 1st and ending March 31st.
  
 BTMB will invoice $17,500 every
April 15th for consulting services commencing April 1st and ending June 30th.

 
 BTMB will invoice $17,500 every July
15th for consulting services commencing July 1st and ending September 30th.

 
 BTMB will invoice $17,500 every October
15th for consulting services commencing October 1st and ending December
31st.















	2.	 Delete Section E. TERM. of Project Rider #1 in its entirety and replace it with the following to read as
follows: 


 E. TERM. The term of this Rider shall commence on the Rider effective date set forth above
and continue and remain in effect through December 31, 2021. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 

  
 2 













 This Amendment #3 is executed by individuals who are duly authorized to legally bind their respective
parties as of the Amendment #3 Effective Date: 
  

									
	MAGENTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 		 	 NATIONAL MARROW DONOR

PROGRAM d/b/a BE THE MATCH

BIOTHERAPIES

					
	By:	 	/s/ Christina Isacson	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Mary Frey
		 	Authorized signature	 		 		 	Authorized signature
					
		 	 Christina Isacson
	 		 		 	 Mary Frey

		 	(Typed/Printed Name)	 		 		 	(Typed/Printed Name)
					
	Title:	 	 Chief Business Officer
	 		 	Title:	 	 Contracts & Procurement Director

					
	Date:	 	 12/16/20
	 		 	Date:	 	 12/7/2020



  
 3
#### Donna GALLAND v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 64621.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 1979.

In re Donna Galland, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 370 So.2d 610.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth No. 02

- 22

- 00201

- CV
I N RE A MERICAN A IRLINES , I NC . § § § § § O riginal Proce e d ing 236th District Court of Tarrant County , Texas Tri al Court No. 236

- 326225

- 21 September 12, 2022 Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack JUDGMENT This court has considered relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus, all responsive filings, and the in camera documents forwarded by the trial judge and holds t hat the petition should be conditionally granted in part. According ly , we conditionally gran t the writ of mandamus in part and order the trial court to vacate its
ver bal directive to the parties to forward all documents to be filed to its co u rt
coor dinato r via email (the Email Order) instead of being paper filed under seal with
t he Tarra nt County District Clerk
. W e further order the t rial court

–– to the extent it has no t already done so

–– to comply with R u le of Civil Pro cedure 74 by noting thefiling date a nd time on the documents t endered solely to the court coordinator via

emai l in accordance with the Emai l Order
. We di rect the c ourt coordinator of the 236th District Court

–– and any other t rial court personnel in possession of digital or paper copies of th e described items

–– to then forward any of those file

- marked documents that have not alre ady b een forwarded a c cording t o our J u ly 26, 2022 order in cause numb er 02

- 22

- 00159

- CV to the Tarrant County District Clerk under seal
. It is fu r ther order ed t hat eac h part y shall bear their own costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue
. SECOND DISTRICT COURT O F APPEALS
By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack
# Egypt

274 items

        -    Report  		Egypt	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Egypt	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Egypt	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Egypt	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Egypt	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Egypt (19-108) – Agreement Regarding Defense Cooperation	  January 8, 2019 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Egypt Summary	   
        -    Report  		Egypt	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Egypt	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Egypt	  May 29, 2018 

previous page1…2425262728next page

Back to Top
#### Phillip Anthony BRANDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1982.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Stewart J. Bellus and Trela J. White, Asst. At-tys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Designated a youthful offender, defendant was placed on probation for a period of three years. Subsequently, as a result of a probation violation, the trial court revoked probation and imposed a sentence of eight years.

The order revoking probation is affirmed on the authority of Watson *v. State,*388 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The eight year sentence, however, is reversed. Defendant’s designation as a youthful offender as defined by the Florida Youthful Offender Act, Sections 958.011-15, Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a subsequent period of incarceration be consistent with the limitations set forth in the act. See Section 958.05(2), Florida Statutes (1979); *Greene v. State,*398 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Therefore, the case is reversed and remanded for imposition of a new sentence consistent with this opinion.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 20 (Monday, February 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2096]



[[Page 5846]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Notice of Adjustment of Statewide Per Capita Threshold for 
Recommending a Cost Share Adjustment

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita threshold for 
recommending cost share adjustments for major disasters declared on or 
after January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, is $122.

DATES: This notice applies to major disasters declared on or after 
January 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 44 CFR 206.47, the statewide per 
capita threshold that is used to recommend an increase of the Federal 
cost share from seventy-five percent (75%) to not more than ninety 
percent (90%) of the eligible cost of permanent work under section 406 
and emergency work under section 403 and section 407 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is adjusted 
annually. The adjustment to the threshold is based on the Consumer 
Price Index for All Urban Consumers published annually by the U.S. 
Department of Labor. For disasters declared on January 1, 2009, through 
December 31, 2009, the qualifying threshold is $122 per capita of State 
population.
    This adjustment in based on an increase of 0.10 percent in the 
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the 12-month period 
that ended December 2008. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on January 16, 2009.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-2096 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Jon HANSEN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG BEACH, Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-1024.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 23, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of Parlex Corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

      (a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
            ending December 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2003

/s/ Peter J. Murphy
-----------------------
Peter J. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### Stanley J. KLINE, Charlotte Kline and E. B. Kline, a/k/a B. E. Kline, Appellants, v. DEVCON REALTY CORPORATION and SOJ Realty Corporation, as Trustee, Appellees.

No. 80-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1981.

*1011Prunty, Ross, Olsen & Israel and Wm. Bruce Israel, Miami, for appellants.

Jepeway & Jepeway and Louis M. Jepe-way, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Parker v. Brinson Construction Co.,*78 So.2d 873, 874 (Fla.1955).
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Broad National Bancorporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement No. 33-28183 on Form S-8 of Broad National
Bancorporation of our report dated January 15, 1998, relating to
the consolidated statements of condition of Broad National
Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears
in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Broad
National Bancorporation.





                                            /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
March 30, 1998
# Brunei

59 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Brunei	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Brunei	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Launches First Regional Summit for the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs in Kuala Lumpur	  March 6, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Brunei National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 22, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		2023 Indo-Pacific Business Forum Promotes Inclusive and Sustainable Growth in the Indo-Pacific	  January 12, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy  		The U.S. APEC Host Year is about Creating a Resilient and Sustainable Future for All	  Matt MurrayDecember 21, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Brunei	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Brunei	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Thailand, Singapore, and Brunei	  June 6, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Brunei	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
#### George T. WATSON, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, an Illinois Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 21, 1979.

*733John R. Hargrove, of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Michael T. Greif, Ft. Lauderdale, and Curtis G. Levine of Baskin & Sears, Boca Raton for appellee.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

In consideration for the appellee’s, The First National Bank of Chicago, extending credit to Kuch and Watson, Inc., an Illinois corporation, appellant, George T. Watson, executed a guaranty agreement guaranteeing repayment of any sums due from Kuch and Watson, Inc., to appellee. When Kuch and Watson, Inc., failed to pay the sum of $28,116.62 due the Bank appellee filed suit on the guaranty agreement.

Appellee’s complaint simply alleged the extension of credit in consideration of the guaranty agreement and that $28,116.62 was due and owing thereon and that the principal debtor, Kuch and Watson, Inc., had failed to make payment. Appellant filed an answer generally denying the allegations of the complaint and affirmatively alleging that no interest was due. After a non-jury trial the trial court entered judgment for the appellee for $28,116.62, plus costs of $137.00. No interest was provided for in said judgment.

Appellant contends the trial court erred because the guaranty agreement and promissory note sued upon were Illinois contracts and their validity and interpretation was governed by the law of Illinois. Therefore, appellant contends appellee was required to plead and prove the law of Illinois and having failed to do so appellee cannot recover.

We believe appellant’s argument is unsound. Either party to this litigation was free to plead and prove the law which was applicable to the contracts in question. Upon the failure to plead any applicable foreign law, it is presumed that any such law is the same as Florida law. *Kingston v. Quimby,*80 So.2d 455 (Fla.1955); *Movielab, Inc. v. Davis,*217 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1969).

Appellee has cross appealed the failure of the trial court to grant appellee interest in the final judgment. Resort to the record reflects that the note in question provided for interest to be paid, but the rate thereof was left blank. Appellant successfully objected to any proof by appellee relating to the rate of interest applicable to this note. Our review of the testimony which appellee sought to adduce to prove its *734entitlement to interest convinces us that the trial court was correct in sustaining appellant’s objections thereto. In many instances the testimony was either not relevant or the witness was not competent to prove the issues. Thus, we find no merit in appellee’s cross appeal.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY v. William David AARON, Sr., et al.

No. 55155.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1974.

In re: Automobile Club Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 296 So.2d 464.

Writ denied. On the facts found the result is correct.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2017 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on April 19, 2017 and ending onFebruary 28, 2018and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 18th day of May, 2018 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
#### § 800.201 Aggregated data.

The term *aggregated data* means data that have been combined or collected together in summary or other form such that the data cannot be identified with any individual.
- Media Hub Home
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of International Media Engagement…Dubai Regional Media Hub

# Dubai Regional Media Hub

Subscribe

## 				Our Mission			

					The Dubai Regional Media Hub leads the U.S. State Department’s efforts to build relations with media outlets throughout the Arab world through interviews and social media. We regularly give broadcast and radio interviews to Arabic outlets across the region. We also facilitate media engagements with Arab outlets by senior USG officials and organize training programs for U.S. Department of State employees and regional Arab journalists.				

Dubai Hub Director and Arabic Language Spokesperson

 Samuel Werberg

							Follow Us:																			FacebookTwitterInstagram

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §206. Privileges of civil-service appointees

Members of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division not appointed from the Metropolitan Police force or the United States Park Police force shall be entitled to the same privileges as to salary, grade, uniforms, equipment, transfer, leave, relief funds, retirement, and refunds as members appointed from the Metropolitan Police force and the United States Park Police force.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 681; Pub. L. 91–217, §1(8), Mar. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 95–179, Nov. 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 1371.)

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–179 substituted “United States Secret Service Uniformed Division” for “Executive Protective Service”.

1970—Pub. L. 91–217 substituted “Members of the Executive Protective Service not appointed from the Metropolitan Police force or the United States Park Police force” for “Members appointed pursuant to section 205 of this title”.
#### Deborah CHARMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC. and Guidant Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Medtronic, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1243.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2001.

Before MICHEL, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Willie Lee MATHEWS and Brazell Curry, Appellees.

No. 74-1616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA SERRANO AND TLP

- EPL

ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA THE LENS

FACTORY; AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF

11450 JAMES WATT, SUITE C1 AND

C2 EL PASO, TEXAS 79936,

Appellants,

v.

FRANCIS PROPERTIES I, LTD.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00191

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Five

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011

- J00021)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant Rosa Serrano is indigent for purposes of appeal,

this Court makes no o ther order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.