alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ivan ROMERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 25, 1980.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1980.

Henry Gonzalez, Thomas G. Murray, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven L. Bolotin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Skelton v. State,*349 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Shea v. State,*167 So.2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
#### Richard B. ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. U-486, U-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Nicholas C. SCANDONE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 00-3275.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 6, 2001.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
# C_2005217EN.01002101.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 7 July 2005

in Joined Cases C-304/04 and 305/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam in Jacob Meijer BV, Eagle International Freight BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification of sound cards for computers - Validity of Regulations (EC) Nos 2086/97 and 2261/98)

(2005/C 217/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Joined Cases C-304/04 and 305/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands), made by decisions of 13 July 2004, received at the Court on 19 July 2004, in the proceedings between Jacob Meijer BV (C-304/04), Eagle International Freight BV (C-305/04) and Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem, the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges, J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar; gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2086/97 of 4 November 1997 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2261/98 of 26 October 1998 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff are invalid in so far as they classify sound cards for computers such as those at issue in the main proceedings under heading 8543 89 79 of the Combined Nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 228 of 11.9.2004.

1

---
No. 99-8765.

#### Clements *v.*Florida Parole and Probation Commission.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### HOUSEMASTER CORPORATION v. CITY OF KENNER.

No. 64149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Housemaster Corporation applying for writ of certiorari, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of Jefferson. Court of Appeal No. 10278.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

*472It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Thomas M. Wicker, Judge of the 24th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 23rd day of April, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be appointed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
HomePeru

# Peru

182 items

        -    TIAS  		Peru (93-309) – SWAP Agreement	  March 9, 1993 
        -    DS Memorial  		Jose Luis Wilfredo Saravia Avila	  February 11, 1992 

previous page1…171819

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2909 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2909

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Act to 
   provide that the Secretary of the Interior may acquire lands for 
 purposes of that Act only by donation or exchange, or otherwise with 
                 the consent of the owner of the lands.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2909

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Act to 
   provide that the Secretary of the Interior may acquire lands for 
 purposes of that Act only by donation or exchange, or otherwise with 
                 the consent of the owner of the lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Silvio O. Conte National Fish and 
Wildlife Refuge Eminent Domain Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON METHOD OF ACQUISITION OF LANDS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              THE SILVIO O. CONTE NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE REFUGE 
              ACT.

    Section 106 of the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife 
Refuge Act (Public Law 102-212; 16 U.S.C. 668dd note) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Restriction on Method of Acquisition.--The Secretary may 
acquire lands in New Hampshire and Vermont for purposes of this title 
only by donation or exchange, or otherwise with the consent of the 
owner of the lands.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Belarus

140 items

        -    Report  		Belarus	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belarus	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Belarus	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Belarus	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Belarus	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Belarus	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Belarus (16-921.1) – Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation Agreement	  September 21, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Belarus (15-729) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 29, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Belarus (10-1001.1) – Agreement Concerning Atomic Energy Transfer of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the Republic of Belarus	  October 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Belarus (01-1221) – Foreign Assistance	  December 21, 2001 

previous page1…121314

Back to Top
# Belarus

140 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 3, 2021	  Ned PriceJune 3, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Media Freedom Coalition Statement on the Arrest of Roman Protasevich	  May 29, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Belarus	  May 27, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Diversion of Ryanair Flight to Belarus and Arrest of Journalist	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 23, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Belarus	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 21, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 21, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Revocation of the Authorization of Belarus General License 2G Due to Human Rights Violations and Abuses	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 19, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 31, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 31, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Belarus	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Key Outcomes at the 46th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  March 24, 2021 

previous page1…91011121314next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 11
                                   ----------

INTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Computation of Earnings Per Share Years Ended  December 31, 1997,  1996 and 1995
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

                                               1997         1996          1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Earnings Per Share:
Net income                                  $  16,664    $   1,680     $  12,387
--------------------------------------------====================================
Weighted average common shares outstanding  2,193,268    2,285,337     2,344,762

Basic earnings per share                    $    7.60    $    0.74     $    5.28
--------------------------------------------====================================

Diluted Earnings per Share:
Net Income                                  $  16,664    $   1,680     $  12,387
Net reduction in interest expense assuming
 conversion of capital notes                      656            *           699
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                                  $  17,320    $   1,680     $  13,086
--------------------------------------------====================================

Weighted average common shares outstanding
 assuming conversion of capital notes and
 exercise of stock options                  2,569,497    2,285,337*    2,743,307

Diluted earnings per share                  $    6.74    $    0.74     $    4.77
--------------------------------------------====================================

         * For 1996,  diluted earnings per share is considered to be the same as
basic  earnings  per share,  since the effect of exercise of stock  options (285
shares) and the conversion of subordinated  capital notes (387,178 shares) would
be antidilutive.
#### § 800.604 Tolling of deadlines during lapse in appropriations.

Any deadline or time limitation under subpart D or E imposed on the Committee shall be tolled during a lapse in appropriations.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERCELY WAYNE COLEMAN a/k/a WAYNE COLEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-864

[June 18, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mariya Weekes, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 90-005417-CF-10A.

Ercely Wayne Coleman, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2005229EN.01002102.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 June 2005

in Case T-138/04 Cementir — Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for annulment of a Commission letter determining the amount of interest for delay applicable to a fine imposed on the applicant - Meaning of a measure confirming an earlier measure - Admissibility)

(2005/C 229/46)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-138/04: Cementir — Cementerie del Tirreno SpA, established in Rome (Italy), represented by D. Fosselard and P. Fattori, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Lyal and V. Di Bucci) — Application for the annulment of the Commission's letter of 28 January 2004 determining the amount of interest for delay applicable to a fine imposed on the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 20 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118 of 30. 4. 2004

1

---
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 15: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 15: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 15 [214 KB]

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
# Lithuania

120 items

        -    Report  		Lithuania	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (17-227) – Agreement on Defense Cooperation	  February 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (15-922.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 22, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (15-618) – Agreement Regarding Defense Cooperation	  June 18, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (14-1007.1) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  October 7, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (11-222) – Agreement on Cooperation in Preventing Illicit Trafficking of Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material	  February 22, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (10-921.2) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 21, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (10-720) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Crime	  July 20, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (10-201.38) – Protocol to the Treaty of January 16, 1998 on Mutual Legal Assistance	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Lithuania (10-201.14) – Protocol to the Treaty on Extradition	  February 1, 2010 

previous page1…9101112next page

Back to Top
HomeMaldives

# Maldives

64 items

        -    TIAS  		Maldives (05-505) – Air Transport Agreement	  May 5, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Maldives (04-1231) – Agreement Regarding Military and Department of Defense Civilian Personnel	  December 31, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Maldives (03-708) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  July 8, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Maldives (12833) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Assistance in Developing and Modernizing Maldives’ Civilian Aviation Infrastructure	  February 17, 1997 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Y. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Hydromer, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Hydromer, Inc.









|Date:
November 16, 2012 | Hydromer Inc.                                            
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                        | By: /s/ Robert Y. Lee                                    
|                        | Robert Y. LeeVice President, Chief
     Financial Officer
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2765

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2765 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.

2 As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall pay to Rocco

4 A. Trecosta, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a former teacher

5 in the Department of Defense Overseas Dependent

6 Schools, back pay in the amount calculated pursuant to

7 section 2.

8 SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.

9 (a) INITIAL CALCULATION OF AMOUNT.—The Sec10 retary of Defense shall calculate the amount that Rocco

11 A. Trecosta would have been awarded had Mr. Trecosta

12 been a member of the plaintiff class in March v. United

13 States, 506 F.2d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

14 (b) GROSS AMOUNT.—The gross amount for pur15 poses of subsection (c) shall be the lesser of—

16 (1) the amount calculated pursuant to sub17 section (a); and

18 (2) $10,000.

19 (c) DEDUCTIONS FROM GROSS AMOUNT.—The Sec20 retary of Defense shall pay to Rocco A. Trecosta the gross

21 amount described in subsection (b) less appropriate

22 amounts for—

23 (1) Civil Service Retirement;

24 (2) Social Security;

25 (3) Federal Employees Group Life Insurance;

26 (4) Federal income tax withholding; and
3

HR 2765 RFS

1 (5) any other similar or related deductions.

2 SEC. 3. FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

3 The payment authorized by this Act shall be in full

4 satisfaction of all claims of Rocco A. Trecosta against the

5 United States for back pay in connection with his service

6 as a teacher in the Department of Defense Overseas De7 pendent Schools.

8 SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON FEES.

9 No more than 10 percent of the payment authorized

10 by this Act shall be paid to or received by any agent or

11 attorney for services rendered in connection with obtaining

12 such payment, any contract to the contrary notwithstand13 ing. Any person who violates this section shall be fined

14 not more than $1,000.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
HomeBelgium

# Belgium

255 items

        -    TIAS  		Belgium (06-601) – Agreement on the Gainful Occupation of Certain Dependents of Diplomatic and Consular Personnel	  June 1, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (05-310) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  March 10, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (00-101) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  January 1, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Belgium (97-901) – Treaty on Extradition	  September 1, 1997 
        -    TIAS  		SUPREME HEADQUARTERS ALLIED POWERS EUROPE (95-131) – Agreement concerning Defense Mutual Logistic Support	  January 31, 1995 

previous page1…242526

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44878-44879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take

[[Page 44879]]

place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that includes the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web-site: 
http://www.nsf.gov/events/advisory.jsp. This information may also be 
requested by telephoning 703/292-8180.

    Dated: August 26, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-20892 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jeffrey STRICKLAND, Paul Rice, Emil Lewis Bocz, Mary Lou Blalock, and Michael Coy Blalock, Appellees.

No. 58736.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 28, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Curtis A. Golden, State Atty., and Thomas M. Berrigan, Asst. State Atty., Pensacola, for appellant.

J. B. Murphy, Pensacola, for Jeffrey Strickland.

William B. Richbourg, Pensacola, for Emil Lewis Bocz.

Larry G. Turner, Gainesville, for. Mary Lou Blalock and Michael Coy Blalock.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to vacate the order of the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit, which order granted appellees’ motion to dismiss, is granted and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with *State v. Benitez,*395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981), and *State v. Yu,*400 So.2d 762 (Fla.1981).

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
§ 54.9816-6 Methodology for calculating qualifying payment amount. ( a ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(a) introductory text through (a)(17). ( 1 ) - ( 17 ) [Reserved]
( 18 ) *Downcode* means the alteration by a plan or issuer of a service code to another service code, or the alteration, addition, or removal by a plan or issuer of a modifier, if the changed code or modifier is associated with a lower qualifying payment amount than the service code or modifier billed by the provider, facility, or provider of air ambulance services.
( b ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(b) and (c).
( c ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(b) and (c).
( d ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(d) introductory text through (d)(1)(i). ( 1 ) [Reserved] ( i ) [Reserved]
( ii ) If the qualifying payment amount is based on a downcoded service code or modifier— ( A ) A statement that the service code or modifier billed by the provider, facility, or provider of air ambulance services was downcoded;
( B ) An explanation of why the claim was downcoded, which must include a description of which service codes were altered, if any, and a description of which modifiers were altered, added, or removed, if any; and
( C ) The amount that would have been the qualifying payment amount had the service code or modifier not been downcoded.
( iii ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(d)(1)(iii) through (v).
( iv ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(d)(1)(iii) through (v).
( v ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(d)(1)(iii) through (v).
( 2 ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(d)(2).
( e ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(e) and (f).
( f ) For further guidance see § 54.9816-6T(e) and (f).
( g ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section are applicable for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, except that paragraph (a)(18) of this section regarding the definition of the term “downcode” and paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section regarding additional information that must be provided if the qualifying payment amount is based on a downcoded service code or modifier are applicable with respect to items or services provided or furnished on or after October 25, 2022, for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
[T.D. 9965, 87 FR 52644, Aug. 26, 2022]