alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. William GANDERT, III, Appellant, v. William T. ROBERTS, Sheriff of Pinellas County, Appellee.

No. 79-2106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 1980.

*1192Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

William Gandert appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Gandert was arrested in Tarpon Springs as an alleged fugitive from Michigan on a charge of making, drawing or uttering three insufficient fund checks. Michigan sought his extradition under the provisions of Chapter 941, Florida Statutes, the Uniform Interstate Extradition Act. Attached to the governor of Michigan’s written demand are copies of a Michigan complaint against appellant for the alleged offenses and a warrant for his arrest, both of which are certified to be authentic by the Michigan governor. Also accompanying the demand are an application for requisition and an affidavit sworn by the prosecuting attorney in Sanilac County, Michigan, neither of which is authenticated by the governor of Michigan.

Appellant argues that because the demand from the governor of Michigan incorporates by reference only two items accompanying the demand, i. e., the complaint and warrant, neither of which alleges appellant’s presence in Michigan at the time of the alleged offenses, appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus should have been granted. We agree and reverse.

The provisions of Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1979), require that the written demand from the governor of the demanding state must allege that the ac-. cused was present in the demanding state at the time of the alleged crime. The demand by the governor of Michigan does not contain such an allegation, and thus is fatally defective under the holding in *Hattaway v. Culbreath,*57 So.2d 661, 663 (Fla.1952).

The State argues that because appellant’s presence in Michigan- at the time of the commission of the alleged offense may be ascertained from the application for requisition attached to the Michigan governor’s demand, the demand satisfies the requirements of Section 941.03. We would agree if the attached application for requisition, which alleges the accused’s presence, had been certified by the governor of Michigan to be authentic. *See Blackburn*v. *Munson,*155 So.2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); *Pecnik v. Blackburn,*132 So.2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961). However, such is not the case. Extradition papers not certified as authentic by the executive authority of the demanding state are illegal and void. *Palmer v. State,*312 So.2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

*1193Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and' OTT, J., concur.
#### Frank WHITEHEAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,532,242
<SECURITIES>                                25,341,505
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,933,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                   221,064
<INVENTORY>                                  5,894,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,789,265
<PP&E>                                      23,871,999
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,880,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,910,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,816,500
<BONDS>                                      1,103,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       405,249
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,156,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,910,739
<SALES>                                     22,952,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,952,817
<CGS>                                       13,074,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,434,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,663,564
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,933,233)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,748,061
<DISCONTINUED>                               (402,631)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,345,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 


 


Applied DNA
Sciences, Inc.


 


Via Email


 


To: Dr. James Hayward


Date: March 2, 2021


 


Dear Dr. Hayward,


 


As you are
aware, you are currently eligible to earn certain performance bonuses if you are continuously employed through the achievement
by Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) of certain performance goals. The current aggregate amount of such bonuses
is $816,840 (the “Total Bonus”). In recognition of your contributions to the Company, the Company desires to accelerate
the payment of $566,840 of your Total Bonus, which will be paid to you within 45 days of your execution of this letter agreement.
In exchange for this accelerated bonus payment, you have agreed to waive your opportunity to earn any remaining portion of the
Total Bonus.


 


This letter
agreement contains the entire agreement between you and the Company concerning the Total Bonus, and supersedes all prior agreements,
understandings, discussions, negotiations and undertakings, whether written or oral, between you and the Company with respect
thereto, including without limitation those certain performance bonus agreements dated December 27, 2018 and December 5, 2019.


 


The bonus
payment hereunder is intended to be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and should be interpreted accordingly.
Nonetheless, the Company does not guarantee the tax treatment of the payment hereunder.


 


This
letter agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original agreement and all of which
shall constitute one and the same agreement. The counterparts of this letter agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile
or other electronic signature (including portable document format) by any of the parties and the receiving parties may rely on
the receipt of such document so executed and delivered electronically or by facsimile as if the original had been received.


 


[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank].


 






     


     


    

 


To confirm your agreement with
the foregoing, please countersign this letter agreement in the space below provided.


 


 


	 	 	APPLIED DNA SCIENCES, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name:BETH JANTZEN, CFO
	 	 	Title:





 


	Accepted and agreed:	 	 
	 
	 	 
	DR. JAMES HAYWARD 	 
	DATE:
#### § 592.305 Importation into the United States.

The term *importation into the United States* means the bringing of goods into the United States.
# C_2005155EN.01002502.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/25

---

Action brought on 14 April 2005 by Carlos Sanchez Ferriz against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-153/05)

(2005/C 155/49)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 14 April 2005 by Carlos Sanchez Ferriz, residing in Brussels, represented by Gilles Bounéou and Frédéric Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the evaluation exercise 2003 in relation to the applicant, |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the evaluation exercise 2003 in relation to the applicant,

| 2. | alternatively, annul the applicant's career development report for the period 1.1.2003-31.12.2003; |
| --- | --- |

2.

alternatively, annul the applicant's career development report for the period 1.1.2003-31.12.2003;

| 3. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant in the present case are identical to those put forward in Cases T-43/04 and T-47/04.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph ALPINE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 80-KH-1782.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Joseph Alpine, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. No. 266-289.

Writ granted. Application filed with pending appeal, 80-KA-2849, as a supplemental assignment of error.
# Angola

88 items

        -    Media Note  		Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation Senior Officials Meeting	  February 20, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 30, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 30, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Angolan Foreign Minister Téte António at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 25, 2024Ministry of External RelationsLuanda, Angola 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 25, 2024Luanda Science CenterLuanda, Angola 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The United States and Angola: Partnering for Prosperity	  January 24, 2024 
        -    		Travel to Cabo Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, and Angola, January 21-26, 2024	   
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 18, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Assistant Secretary for African Affairs Molly Phee Previewing the Secretary’s Trip to Cabo Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, and Angola	  January 18, 2024Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Cabo Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, and Angola	  Matthew MillerJanuary 18, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): DRL Promoting Free Expression in Angola	  December 13, 2023 

123…9next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           14085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    96886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     22125
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                113738
<PP&E>                                           57072
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  331326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           169630
<BONDS>                                          78000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16016
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      107685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    331326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 93648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    61337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 31385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (6629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (6930)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    1341
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.80)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 119E/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.119.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 119E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5524 April 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.119.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 119E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5524 April 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 119E/01 | Appendix to Annex V to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2012/C 119E/01

Appendix to Annex V to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25.1701-1**Date:**12/04/2007** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Certification of Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems on Transport Category Airplanes** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  25**Section Number(s):**Sec. 25.1701** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**ANM-100** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
HomeMexico

# Mexico

498 items

        -    TIAS  		Mexico (07-502.1) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  May 2, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (06-1108.2) – Protocol Concerning the Allotment and Use of the 698 – 806 MHz Band for Terrestrial Non-Broadcasting Radiocommunication Services Along the Common Border	  November 8, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (06-718) – Agreement Amending the Air Transport Agreement of August 15, 1960, as Amended and Extended	  July 18, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (06-613) – Agreement to Promote Technical Cooperation in Environmental and Natural Resource Areas	  June 13, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (06-117) – Agreement on Trade in Tequila	  January 17, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (05-727.2) – Protocol Concerning the Allotment and Use of the 380-399.9 MHz Band for Fixed and Mobile Terrestrial Non-Broadcasting Services Along the Common Border	  July 27, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (05-727) – Protocol Concerning the Allotment and Use of the 406.1 – 420 Band for Fixed and Mobile Services Along the Common Border	  July 27, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (04-0806.1) – Protocol Amending Agreement of November 16 and 18, 1993 Concerning the Establishment of a Border Environment Cooperation Commission and a North American Development Bank	  August 6, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (04-0614) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  June 14, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (04-305.1) – Minute 311 of the International Boundary Water Commission: Recommendations for Secondary Treatment in Mexico of the Sewage Emanating from the Tijuana River Area in Baja California, Mexico	  March 5, 2004 

previous page1…4445464748…50next page

Back to Top
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Centennial Bancorp and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-44701, 33-86650
and 333-32081) of our report dated January 22, 1998 on our audits of the
consolidated balance sheets of Centennial Bancorp and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 1997, which report is incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Eugene, Oregon
March 30, 1999
# Nauru

34 items

        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Nauru	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Nauru	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Nauru	  February 27, 2020 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		World Meteorological Organization – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Andorra and Nauru, December 23, 2019	  December 26, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nauru	  June 21, 2019 
        -    		Nauru	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nauru	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Nauru	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Nauru	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Nauru	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1234next page

Back to Top
December 9, 2014
U .S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590
D ear Ms. Snoden:
B elow please find responses to your requ est for additional information regarding the Final Order for Commuter Air Carrier Authorization for Gem Air, LLC.
G em Air has not made any changes in its ownership, key personnel, operating plans, financial posture, or compliance history since the date of the Show Cause Order.
O f the estimated $28,000 of pre-operating expenses, $0.00 remains, and Gem Air has no additions or revisions to the original estimate.
P lease find the following documents attached: OST form 6410, Gem Air, LLC’s Air Carrier Certificate, Operation s Specifications authorizing schedu led service from FAA, and 3 rd party verification of funds.
T hank you for your time and consideration.
S incerely,

J oAnn Wolters CEO

Re quired Statement below by JoAnn E. Wolters, CEO of Gem Air LLC Pursuant to Title 18 United States Code Section 1001, the information provided in this letter is true and correct and the aforementioned individual has not knowingly and willingly falsified, concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement in connection with the preparation or filing of the material submitted.

____________________________________ J oAnn E. Wolters, CEO
#### William Scott EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-2224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 30, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1982.

*1079Robert D. Hurth, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Scott Evans, appeals from an order revoking probation. The affidavit of violation of probation charged two counts, i.e., burglary of the Beach Club Hotel in Fort Lauderdale and burglary of a souvenir shop located within the hotel. The trial court found appellant guilty of grand larceny as a ‘lesser included offense’ of the first burglary count and guilty of aiding and abetting as to the second count. Based on these findings, the court revoked appellant’s probation for possession of cocaine and sentenced him to three years imprisonment. For the reasons set forth below we affirm.

On this appeal, Evans claims, correctly, that neither grand larceny nor aiding and abetting are lesser included offenses to burglary. Thus, he contends his probation was improperly revoked on the basis of violations not alleged in the probation affidavit. To support his position, Evans cites *Cucco v. State,*356 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). In *Cucco*the defendant was charged with having violated his probation by committing grand larceny. The trial court revoked his probation upon a finding that he had engaged in the sale of stolen property. We reversed, holding that the sale of stolen property was not a lesser included offense to larceny. We noted that “fundamental due process requires that revocation of probation be based only on violations alleged .. . . ” 356 So.2d 58, 59.

After *Cucco,*however, the Supreme Court rendered its decision in *Hines v. State,*358 So.2d 183 (Fla.1978). There the court held that an affidavit for violation of probation which merely charged a felony arrest was sufficient to support a revocation of probation because the probationer had adequate written notice of the felony upon which the revocation was based. The record in *Hines*indicated that the probationer had actual notice of the charges he faced, since he had been arrested near the scene of the crime and had made a confession. Thus, the court concluded that the failure of the probation revocation affidavit to specifically list the felony conviction charging Hines was harmless error.

We believe the same rationale applies in the case at bar. Appellant knew from the affidavit of probation violation that proof of a larceny would be adduced at the probation revocation hearing. The affidavit in question charged Evans, in both counts, with “unlawfully entering] and re-mainpng] in a structure . . . with the intent to commit the offense of larceny therein.” Consequently, Evans was not denied due process notice as to the facts and circumstances the trial judge would consider to determine whether probation should be revoked. *See also Norris v. State,*383 So.2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA) *petition for review denied,*388 So.2d 1116 (Fla.1980).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health: Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Board on Radiation and 
Worker Health, Department of Health and Human Services, has been 
renewed for a 2-year period through August 3, 2011.
    For information, contact Mr. Theodore Katz, Executive Secretary, 
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, Department of Health and 
Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, M/S E20, Atlanta, Georgia, 30341, 
telephone 404/498-2533, or fax 404/498-2570.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 
Registry.

    Dated: August 19, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-20958 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P