alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

129 items

        -    Media Note  		Annual Global Human Rights Defender Award Recipients Announced	  February 1, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Honduras Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues  The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and Honduras on the occasion of the Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues.	  January 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Honduras Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues	  January 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		High-Level U.S. Delegation to Visit Honduras for Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues	  January 6, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Protecting, Defending and Promoting Civic Space in Central America	  Uzra ZeyaDecember 5, 2022Wilson CenterWashington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Remarks at the HUGE (Honduras, USA, Guatemala, El Salvador) Business and Investment Council Annual Meeting	  Jose W. FernandezOctober 13, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Honduras National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 15, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Finalists Announced for 2022 P3 Impact Award 	  August 4, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Honduras	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Release of the Section 353 List of Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors for Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Nicaragua	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 20, 2022 

previous page123456…13next page

Back to Top
#### Stuyvesant Security Company, respondent, *v.*John Dreyer et al., appellants.

[Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Mr. Adam J.*Bossbach, for the respondent.

*Mr. Anthony B. Finelli,*for the appellants.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in *IOS N. J. Fq. 4S7.*

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14=.

*For reversal*— None.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders and Stroke. The meeting will be closed to the public as 
indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by 
the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
    Date: October 4-6, 2009.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Alan P. Koretsky, PhD, Scientific Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders & Stroke, NIH, 35 Convent Drive, Room 6A 908, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-2232, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c47435e49585f47554d6c424542485f02424544024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b3034293e2f2830223a1b3532353f2875353233753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20874 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Cornerstone Properties Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File
No.'s 333-72449, 333-18303, 333-47149, 333-59259, 333-77139) and Form S-8 (File
No. 333-59923) of our report dated February 24, 1999, except for Notes 8 and 20
for which the date is February 26, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
 
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
New York, New York
April 30, 1999
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs...Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Releases

604 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Lacey Act Amendment Programming (Summary)	  July 28, 2016 
        -    		Meeting on High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean	  July 6, 2016 
        -    		Meeting on High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean	  April 19, 2016 
        -    		Meeting on High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean	  December 1, 2015 

previous page1…596061

Back to Top
# Republic of the Congo

64 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Republic of the Congo	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 7, 2019 
        -    Report  		Congo, Republic of the	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Republic of the Congo	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Republic of the Congo	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Republic of the Congo	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Republic of the Congo	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    Report  		Congo, Republic of the	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Republic of the Congo	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

| | Name of Subsidiary             |  | State or County
of Incorporation | 
| | ------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------- | 
| |                                |  |                                  | 
| | Southern Michigan Bank & Trust |  | Michigan                         | 
| |                                |  |                                  | 
| | SMB&T Financial Services, Inc. |  | Michigan                         | 
| |                                |  |                                  | 
| | SMB Mortgage Company           |  | Michigan                         | 

Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. is the immediate parent and owns 100% of the outstanding shares of Southern Michigan Bank & Trust.  Southern Michigan Bank & Trust is the immediate parent and owns 100% of the outstanding shares of SMB&T Financial Services, Inc. and SMB Mortgage Company.
Order entered April 19, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 00743 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 0074 4 - CR ANTHONY EUGENE JOHNSON , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F08 - 71994 - V & F11 - 00273 - V 

### O RDER These cases were submitted March 27, 2013. A review of the record shows State’s exhibits 26 and 27 are not in the reporter’s record on file in this Court. We ORDER Nancy Brewer, the o fficial court reporter of the 292nd Judicial District Court, to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing the State’s exhibits 26 and 27 by April 26, 2013.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Changing Minds, Winning Peace: A New Strategic Direction for U.S. Public Diplomacy in the Arab & Muslim World (2003)

# 									Changing Minds, Winning Peace: A New Strategic Direction for U.S. Public Diplomacy in the Arab & Muslim World (2003)							

ACPD Special Report

October 1, 2003

Changing Minds, Winning Peace: A New Strategic Direction for U.S. Public Diplomacy in the Arab & Muslim World

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top
#### Victor GARCIA; David Larriva; Albert McDonald; Victor Sanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; International Association Longshoremen & Warehousemen Union; Local 13 International Association of Longshoremen & Warehousemen Union, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-55636.

D.C. No. CV-98-09509-AAH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 2000.*

Decided Feb. 7, 2001.

*338Before D.W. NELSON, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants argue that like in *Lewis v. Local Union No. 100 of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, AFL-CIO,*750 F.2d 1368 (7th Cir.1984), in which the Seventh Circuit held that a union’s repeated failure to refer a member out for employment was a continuing pattern of illegal conduct, appellees’ repeated refusals to reinstate appellants constitutes a continuing violation. However, this case is more analogous to *Collins v. United Air Lines, Inc.,*514 F.2d 594 (9th Cir.1975), in which we held that a former airline employee claiming wrongful discharge could not circumvent the 90-day limitation period by alleging that the most recent denial of her request for reinstatement was within the limitation period. Instead, we found, “[a] discharged employee who seeks to be reinstated is really litigating the unfairness of his original discharge.” *Id.*at 5*96 (internal quotations omitted). This reasoning applies equally to the facts of this case: An employee refused retesting and reinstatement who later seeks reinstatement by a court is really litigating the unfairness of the original refusal. This conclusion is not affected by appellants’ contention that others who had also failed drug tests were later reinstated, as this was consistent with the rules in effect at the time.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts in this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Panama

159 items

        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Panama	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Panama	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Panama	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Panama	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Panama Free Trade Agreement	   
        -    		Panama	  April 24, 2019 
        -    		Relief and Development Coherence	   
        -    Report  		Panama	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		U.S.-Panama TPA Investor-State Arbitrations	   
        -    		Bridgestone Licensing Services, Inc., and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v. The Republic of Panama	   

previous page1…1011121314…16next page

Back to Top
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**  I, Linda J. Miles, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this annual report on Amendment Number One to Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified forthe registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls: and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and6) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.   */s/* LINDA J. MILES   Linda J. Miles  Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Dated March 22, 2006
Filed 10/29/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 253

In the Interest of D.V.A.

----------

Julie Lawyer, State's Attorney, 

Petitioner and Appellee

v.

D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20190118

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Marina Spahr (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for 

petitioner and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.
1

Interest of D.V.A.

No. 20190118

Per Curiam. 

[¶1] D.V.A. appealed from a district court order denying his petition for 

discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. 

argues there was not clear and convincing evidence that he continues to be a 

sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(8) or that he has 

“serious difficulty controlling behavior.” See Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407, 

412-13 (2002). We conclude the district court’s findings of fact and order are

supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

 Jon J. Jensen

 Jerod E. Tufte

 Daniel J. Crothers

 Lisa Fair McEvers
#### § 599.304 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support* means any property, tangible or intangible, including currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this section means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.
P.1 

I 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

221) IV-E-95 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 221 of 242 
i r^m^l \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC 

p? 

7Z-e- ?r 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OCT 3 I J99, 

OFFICE OF 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with API Officials l| fl j-LLkOLX-A*~,!..*;{] ll 

c(/ W"J.\ ra'\:\ 

FROM: Steven Silverman-^/^/ '\ PFC - 2 199! \\['\ 

Attorney I 

Solid Waste & Emergency Response 

Division (LE-132S) 

TO: On-Board Rulemaking Record 

J 

On September 17, 1991, Mike Winer, Alan Eckert, and I met 

briefly with Bill Frick (General Counsel of API) and Dave Deal 

of the American Petroleum Institute regarding legal issues posed 

by the on-board statutory provisions. They indicated their view 

that EPA has mandatory duty to make a final decision, i.e., that 

NHTSA is not a decisionmaker. They also indicated they don't 

view § 202(a)(6) as creating a mandatory duty to issue an onboard rule if there are true safety concerns (degree unspecified) 

with on-board. T7hey also acknowledged, although didn't 

necessarily endorse, the argument regarding safety comparison 

with Stage II. They also indicated that they had read the other 

docket materials not related to NHTSA's study. 

Printed on Recycled Paper
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2969

AN ACT

To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts by repealing

the Tea Importation Act of 1897.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2969

AN ACT

To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts by repealing the

Tea Importation Act of 1897.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Tea Tasters

5 Repeal Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 2969 EH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TEA IMPORTATION ACT OF 1897.

2 The Tea Importation Act (21 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) is

3 repealed.

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

5 This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment

6 of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### John M. SPAIN v. LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION.

No. 80-C-2712.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re John M. Spain, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of *1355Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 393 So.2d 226.

Granted.
Exhibit 11

                     PARLEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Computation of Net Income Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                   -------------------------------------
                                                   September 30, 2001    October 1, 2000
                                                   ------------------    ---------------


                                                    <c>                  <c>
Basic earnings per share                                  ($0.18)               $0.14

Weighted average number of shares outstanding          6,303,216            6,277,751

Diluted earnings per share                                ($0.18)               $0.14

Weighted average number of shares outstanding          6,303,216            6,277,751

Effect of dilutive stock options                               -              178,423

Adjusted weighted average number of
 shares outstanding                                    6,303,216            6,456,174
</TABLE>
# C_2005193EN.01000801.xml

| 6.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 16 June 2005

in Case C-349/04: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/77/EC - Markets for electronic communications networks and services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 193/12)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-349/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Gippini Fournier and K. Mojzesowicz) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 13 August 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 June 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to supply the Commission of the European Communities with all the information necessary to allow it to confirm that the provisions of Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services have been complied with, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to supply the Commission of the European Communities with all the information necessary to allow it to confirm that the provisions of Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services have been complied with, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9 of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 25.9.2004.

1

---
§ 802.405 Committee actions. ( a ) Upon receiving a declaration submitted under § 802.401 with respect to a covered real estate transaction, the Committee may, at the discretion of the Committee: ( 1 ) If the Committee has reason to believe that the transaction may raise national security considerations, request that the parties to the transaction file a written notice under subpart E;
( 2 ) Inform the parties to the transaction that the Committee is not able to conclude action under section 721 with respect to the transaction on the basis of the declaration and that the parties may file a written notice under subpart E to seek written notification from the Committee that the Committee has concluded all action under section 721 with respect to the transaction;
( 3 ) Initiate a unilateral review of the transaction under § 802.501(c); or
( 4 ) Notify the parties in writing that the Committee has concluded all action under section 721 with respect to the transaction.
( b ) The Committee shall take action under paragraph (a) of this section within the time period set forth in § 802.403(b).
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James GLEASON, Appellee.

No. 78-1354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 23, 1979.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Clear-water, and Gordon B. Scott, Asst. Public Defender, New Port Richey, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. See *State v. Allen et al.,*362 So.2d 10 (Fla.1978).

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.