alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HUNT TRUCK SALES & SERVICE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. HOLOPAK VILLAGE, INC., a corporation and R. D. Phillips Paving Contractor, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 77-2227.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 21, 1979.

*730Francis E. Pierce, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.

James A. Barks of Steed & Collins, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order awarding attorneys’ fees to defendants as the prevailing party in an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The award was pursuant to Section 713.29, Florida Statutes. We have considered each of the eleven points raised by appellant — plaintiff in its brief and find them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2685 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2685

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

         To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2685

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
         To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVERAGE DATA BANK.

    (a) In General.--Section 1144 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1320b-14), as added by section 13581(a) of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (in this section referred to as ``OBRA-
93''), is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Medicare.--Section 1862(b)(5) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395y(b)(5)), as amended by section 13581(b)(1) of OBRA-93, is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the dash and 
                all that follows through the end and inserting 
                ``subparagraph (A) for purposes of carrying out this 
                subsection.'', and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking 
                ``subparagraph (B)(i)'' and inserting ``subparagraph 
                (B)''.
            (2) Medicaid.--Section 1902(a)(25)(A)(i) of such Act (42 
        U.S.C. 1396a(a)(25)(A)(i)), as amended by section 13581(b)(2) 
        of OBRA-93, is amended by striking ``including the use of'' and 
        all that follows through ``any additional measures''.
            (3) Data matches.--Section 552a(a)(8)(B) of title 5, United 
        States Code, as amended by section 13581(c) of OBRA-93, is 
        amended--
                    (A) by adding ``or'' at the end of clause (v),
                    (B) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (vi), 
                and
                    (C) by striking clause (vii).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DENNIS COX,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3843

[April 30, 2020]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 05017017CFB.

Dennis Cox, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Maxwell *v.*Beltzhover.

Where there is a plea in confession and avoidance, the plaintiff cannot be compelled to try under a rule of court, which dispenses with a replication where a substantial issue is raised by the pleadings.

In error from the Common Pleas of Allegheny.

To a *scire facias sur*judgment against defendant as garnishee, he pleaded in confession and avoidance. The court nonsuited the plaintiff when the cause was called, though there was no replication. It is believed there is a rule of that court which dispenses with replications where a substantial issue is raised by the pleadings.

*Alden,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sept.*12.

Coulter, J.

The declaration was filed on the 17th day of July, 1847, and a special plea entered by the garnishee on the 19th of same month and year. The plea admits the execution and delivery' of the note on which the plaintiff declares, as the foundation of the liability of the garnishee, but seeks to avoid and defeat its recovery by an allegation of new and distinct matter. To this *140the plaintiff might have demurred, if he thought the matter insufficient ; or he might have replied, denying the facts and concluding to the country. But he did neither; and there was in fact neither an issue in form nor substance. There was no issue. The course of the defendant was to compel an issue by talcing a rule on the plaintiff to reply. It was clear error in the court to nonsuit the plaintiff, for not proceeding to trial. Neither the words nor the spirit of the rule of court authorize it.

Judgment reversed, and a *venire de novo*awarded.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0085 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-004-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-61A, D, E, L, N, NM, R, and V 

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 78 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This proposed AD is prompted by a National Transportation Safety Board review of inservice events where engine performance degradation occurred and the review determined that 

some of these events were caused by contaminants larger than 10 microns present in the engine 

fuel control units (FCUs). The proposed actions are intended to prevent particulate contamination 

in the FCU, which could lead to malfunction of an internal valve(s), power loss at a critical phase 

of flight, and loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $370

Labor per Helicopter

(4 x $85/work-hour)

$340

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $710

Total US Fleet Cost $55,380

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Kirk Gustafson
#### § 137.344 May a Self-Governance Tribe reallocate funds among construction project agreements?

Yes, a Self-Governance Tribe may reallocate funds among construction project agreements to the extent not prohibited by applicable appropriation law(s).
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1915

___________

Flora J. Moseley Smith, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Chase Manhattan Mortgage *

Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 12, 2007

Filed: March 22, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below claimed that a mortgage lender violated the Real Estate

Settlement Procedure Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e)(2)(c)(i), by charging her a

$5.00 fee for faxing her a payoff statement when she requested it. The district court1

granted summary judgment to the lender and plaintiff appealed. This case is

controlled by Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (8th Cir. 2006), and
-2-

Curran v. Washington Mut. Bank, 471 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam), where

we rejected an identical claim, and we therefore reject the claim here.

We decline to address plaintiff's claim that even if a lender can charge fees in

the present circumstances, such fees must be reasonable, because the claim was raised

on appeal for the first time. See Watt, 457 F.3d at 784.

Affirmed.

______________________________
#### § 546.703 Penalty imposition.

If, after considering any written response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and any relevant facts, OFAC determines that there was a violation by the alleged violator named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and that a civil monetary penalty is appropriate, OFAC may issue a written Penalty Notice to the violator containing a determination of the violation and the imposition of the monetary penalty. For additional details concerning issuance of a Penalty Notice, see appendix A to part 501 of this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty Notice shall constitute final agency action. The violator has the right to seek judicial review of that final agency action in Federal district court.

[74 FR 25432, May 28, 2009, as amended at 89 FR 67557, Aug. 21, 2024]
IB

Union Calendar No. 278

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2982

[Report No. 104–568]

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Carbon Hill National

Fish Hatchery to the State of Alabama.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1996

Mr. BEVILL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

MAY 8, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Carbon

Hill National Fish Hatchery to the State of Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carbon Hill National

5 Fish Hatchery Conveyance Act’’.
2

•HR 2982 RH

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CARBON HILL NATIONAL FISH

2 HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA.

3 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

5 of the Interior shall convey to the State of Alabama with6 out reimbursement, all right, title, and interest of the

7 United States in and to the property described in sub8 section (b), for use by the Game and Fish Division of the

9 Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Re10 sources, as part of the State of Alabama fish culture pro11 gram.

12 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred

13 to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Carbon

14 Hill National Fish Hatchery, located on County Road 63

15 at Carbon Hill, Alabama, in Walker County, Alabama,

16 consisting of 67 acres (more or less), and all improvements

17 and related personal property under the control of the Sec18 retary that is located on that property, including build19 ings, structures, equipment, and all easements, leases, and

20 water rights relating to that property.

21 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The prop22 erty conveyed to the State of Alabama pursuant to this

23 section shall be used by the State for purposes of fishery

24 resources management and fisheries-related activities, and

25 if it is used for any other purpose detrimental to those

26 purposes and activities, all right, title, and interest in and
3

•HR 2982 RH

1 to all property conveyed pursuant to this section shall re2 vert to the United States. The State of Alabama shall en3 sure that the property reverting to the United States is

4 in substantially the same or better condition as at the time

5 of transfer.
Union Calendar No. 278

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2982

[Report No. 104–568]

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey

State of Alabama.the Carbon Hill National Fish Hatchery to the

MAY 8, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
HomeNauru

# Nauru

33 items

        -    Press Statement  		Nauru National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 30, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Nauru Officially Breaks Ties with Taiwan	  Matthew MillerJanuary 15, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Nepal	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Nauru	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Nauru	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Nauru National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Building Economic Inclusion via the Blue Economy Program	  October 7, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Investing in the Future of the Pacific: U.S. Assistance Continues to Address WWII-era Explosive Hazards	  September 29, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Governance of the Seas: Assistance to Pacific Island Partners	  September 28, 2022 

1234next page

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20374

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE COLLAZO, also known as Carlos E. Soto,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-377-3

--------------------

April 10, 2002

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Collazo asserts that the district court erred in

upwardly adjusting his sentence for obstruction of justice

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Collazo contends that his

misrepresentations regarding his identity were not willful, but

resulted from confusion, mistake, or faulty memory.

The presentence report (“PSR”) found that Collazo obstructed

justice by willfully providing materially false information

regarding his true identity to the magistrate judge during the

detention hearing. Since Collazo did not present at the
No. 01-20374 

-2-

sentencing hearing any rebuttal evidence in support of his

objection, the district court was free to adopt the PSR’s finding

without further inquiry. See United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d

114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the district court did

not err, clearly or otherwise, in finding that Collazo obstructed

justice. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment. (nn.2, 4(f)); United

States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### In re the ESTATE of Robert L. REID, Deceased. Daniel REID, Appellant, v. Ruby WHITFIELD and Bertha Paul, Appellees.

No. WW-248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1981.

David C. Goodman, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Gerald R. Hart, Jacksonville, for appel-lees.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the probate judge which held that Daniel Reid, the sole surviving lineal descendant of Robert L. Reid was denied a share in the intestate estate of Robert L. Reid because the will provided a specific bequest for him. We reverse.

Robert L. Reid, a widower, died leaving a last will and testament establishing a trust, the net income of which was to be used for the benefit of his daughter Alma up to $75.00 per month, with any excess income to paid to his son Daniel. The will further provided that if Alma predeceased Daniel the trust should terminate and Robert’s other son Reuben should take the balance of the corpus and the income, but should pay Daniel $20.00 per month for the rest of his life. Alma and Reuben both predeceased Robert, leaving Daniel as the sole surviving lineal descendant. When Daniel applied for administration, appellees, nieces of the decedent, filed for construction of the will and *1033designation of beneficiaries. In denying Daniel’s motion to dismiss their petition the trial court properly found that the bequests to Alma, Reuben and Mrs. Reid had failed, and, since no provisions for the remainder were made, the will was ineffective to dispose of the estate except for the bequest to Daniel of $20.00 per month. See *In Re Levy’s Estate,*196 So.2d 225 (Fla.3d DCA 1967).

The trial court, relying on the general maxim that the testator’s intent is the polestar in interpreting a will, then determined that the testator intended that Daniel take only the $20.00 per month for the rest of his life, and the remaining estate should be distributed to the heirs-at-law determinable as of Daniel’s death. In this ruling, the trial court erred. Unquestionably, the intention of the testator is the primary factor in determining the meaning of any will. *In Re Estate of Lesher,*365 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). However, once a will is declared invalid, the testator’s intent is no longer controlling and the property must pass according to the law of intestate succession. *In Re Stephan’s Estate,*194 So. 343 (Fla.1940); *In Re Lubbe’s Estate,*142 So.2d 130 (Fla.2d DCA 1962); Section 732.101(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Pursuant to § 732.103, Florida Statutes (1979), the lineal descendants of the decedent take the entire intestate estate if there is no surviving spouse. Daniel as the sole surviving lineal descendant is therefore entitled to the entire estate.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS, J., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7023

DARRIS CORDELL MCQUILLIA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-272-A)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darris Cordell McQuillia, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge

Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Darris Cordell McQuillia seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny McQuillia’s motion for a transcript,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

McQuillia v. Angelone, No. CA-01-272-A (E.D. Va. May 16, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeNew Zealand

# New Zealand

119 items

        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		First Counter-Drone FVEY Policy Forum Workshop Furthers Cooperation in Countering Emerging Technology Threats	  December 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Finkenauer’s Travel to Australia and New Zealand	  November 7, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		October 10 briefing with Ambassador Julianne Smith, U.S. Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)	  October 10, 2023Brussels Media Hub 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Ministerial Meeting of the Resettlement Diplomacy Network	  September 18, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Human Rights and Democracy  		Expanding the Global Equality Fund and Protecting Human Rights with New International Partners	  August 25, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State, U.S. Soccer Take Global Efforts to Grow the Game of Soccer, Sports Diplomacy to Next Level Through New Partnership	  July 27, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And U.S. Soccer President Cindy Cone At a Sports Diplomacy Event	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 27, 2023Wellington, New Zealand 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Nanaia Mahuta at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 26, 2023Wellington, New Zealand 

previous page1234…12next page

Back to Top
# Mozambique

94 items

        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Mozambique	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – June 24, 2021	  Jalina PorterJune 24, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Mozambique	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Humanitarian Aid and Supplies Help Respond to Insecurity in Mozambique	  May 6, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mozambique	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing with Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS John Godfrey on U.S. Participation in the Upcoming D-ISIS Ministerial	  March 29, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Terrorist Attack in Mozambique	  Ned PriceMarch 26, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2021	  Ned PriceMarch 11, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		State Department Terrorist Designations of ISIS Affiliates and Leaders in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mozambique	  March 10, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY20 IRF: Expanding Religious Tolerance in Mozambique	  March 1, 2021 

previous page1…45678…10next page

Back to Top
#### § 1003.1600 Reinstatement.

A person who has been excluded in accordance with this part may apply for reinstatement at the end of the period of exclusion. The OIG will consider any request for reinstatement in accordance with the provisions of 42 CFR 1001.3001 through 1001.3004.