alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



The Board of Directors
Redding Bancorp and subsidiaries


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement dated
February 3, 1999 on Form S-8 of Redding Bancorp and subsidiaries of our report
dated January 21, 1998, except as to the first paragraph of note 12, which is
as of June 16, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Redding
Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K of Redding Bancorp.



Sacramento, California
March 24, 1999
698 A.2d 569

#### In the Matter of Anthony L.V. PICCIOTTI.

No. 325, Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 2, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 6, 1997, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Anthony L.V. Picciotti to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Anthony L.V. Picciotti is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
FY12 10-K Exhibit 10.42 Fiscal 2013 Performance Results Bonus


Exhibit 10.42


Fiscal 2013 Performance Results Bonus


On August 8, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved design changes to the Performance Results Bonus for fiscal 2013 (the “2013 PRB”), previously known as the short term incentive plan, as the Company’s performance-based incentive plan. 
The 2013 PRB is an integral part of compensation for our employees that are at the level of director or above, which includes our executive officers. The 2013 PRB provides that quarterly bonuses are payable, subject to the Compensation Committee’s discretion, based upon (1) achievement of certain revenue and non-GAAP gross margin performance targets established by the Compensation Committee, and (2) target bonus amounts for each eligible individual established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee established annual target bonus amounts, to be determined and paid on a quarterly basis, for the 2013 PRB, which include bonus amounts payable to the Company’s named executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission). 
Quarterly bonus amounts under the 2013 PRB will be subject to the Compensation Committee’s discretion, and will depend on the specific levels of actual revenue and non-GAAP gross margin attained. Such quarterly bonuses would be “earned” and payable if the Company’s non-GAAP gross margin is within a range of respective percentages that includes a threshold requirement of 75% and a maximum target of 125%, and revenue is within a range of respective percentages that includes a threshold requirement of 90% and a maximum target of 110%.  The minimum threshold payout starts at 50%, with a maximum payout cap of 150%. Failure to meet the threshold requirement would result in no quarterly bonus amount being paid. 
Further, at the end of FY2013, the Compensation Committee will compare the aggregate percentage of all quarterly bonus amounts paid during the fiscal year, with the actual revenue and non-GAAP gross margin attained for the entire 2013 fiscal year, and determine whether a “true-up” payment is necessary to prevent the actual quarterly payouts from negatively impacting the annual payout had the plan been measured for the full year.
#### BLUE CROSS OF FLORIDA, INC., and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Appellants, v. Ann PETKUNAS, by and through her son and Legal Guardian, Daniel Petkunas and Daniel Petkunas, individually, Appellees.

No. 80-1444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 1981.

Proby & Adkins and H. Lawrence Hardy, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Miami, Grover, Ciment, Weinstein & Stau-ber, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment awarding attorney’s fees is reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of fixing and determining fees in accordance with the applicable statutory criteria, pursuant to Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1979), which authorizes attorney’s fees for “prosecuting the suit in which the recovery is had,” *accord, American Home Assurance Company v. Keller Industries, Inc.,*347 So.2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), *cert. denied,*360 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1978).

Reversed and remanded.
# Poland

184 items

        -    Report  		Poland	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Poland	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Poland	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Poland	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Poland	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Poland	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Poland	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Poland	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (16-928.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 28, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Poland (16-316) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  March 16, 2016 

previous page1…141516171819next page

Back to Top
§ 7.4 Responsibilities of the General Counsel. ( a ) The General Counsel shall be responsible for determining, subject to review by the Commissioner of Patents, the respective rights of the Government and of the inventor in and to any invention made by an employee of the Department.
( b ) On the basis of the foregoing determination, the General Counsel shall determine whether patent protection will be sought by the Department for such an invention.
( c ) The General Counsel will prepare and furnish to the Patent Office the reports required by the regulations of that Office and will serve as the liaison officer between the Department and the Commissioner of Patents.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2639 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2639

 To provide that Members of Congress shall not be paid during Federal 
             Government shutdowns, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 1995

 Mr. Dingell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that Members of Congress shall not be paid during Federal 
             Government shutdowns, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DURING GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS.

    Basic pay of a Member of Congress may not be disbursed during any 
period in which--
            (1) there is a lapse in appropriations for any Federal 
        agency or department as a result of a failure to enact a 
        regular appropriations bill or continuing resolution; or
            (2) the Federal Government is unable to make payments or 
        meet obligations because the public debt limit under section 
        3101 of title 31, United States Code, has been reached.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF GOVERNMENT-FUNDED TRANSPORTATION.

    No Member of Congress, including the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, and any Majority Leader, Minority Leader, or Whip of 
either House of Congress, shall be entitled to the use of Government-
funded vehicles or personnel for purposes of transportation during any 
period referred to in section 1(a), except in the case of a medical 
emergency.

SEC. 3. USE OF MEMBERS' GYMNASIUM PROHIBITED.

    The gymnasiums for the House of Representatives and the Senate, 
respectively, shall, during any period referred to in section 1(a), be 
deemed non-essential and remain closed.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 297

To terminate all United States assistance to the National Endowment for

Democracy, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To terminate all United States assistance to the National

Endowment for Democracy, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF ASSISTANCE TO THE NA4 TIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY.

5 (a) REPEAL OF NED ACT.—The National Endow6 ment for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4411 et seq.) is here7 by repealed.

8 (b) PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO NED.—Funds

9 may not be expended by any department, agency, or in-
2

•HR 297 IH

1 strumentality of the United States for grants or any other

2 assistance for the National Endowment for Democracy.

3 (c) FINAL AUDIT BY GAO.—The Comptroller Gen4 eral of the United States shall conduct an audit with re5 spect to any funds, not previously audited by the Comp6 troller General, granted by the United States Government

7 to the National Endowment for Democracy and shall sub8 mit a report of that audit to the Congress. The audit shall

9 be conducted in accordance with, and under the conditions

10 set forth in, section 504 of the National Endowment for

11 Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4413).

12 (d) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION.—Notwithstanding

13 subsection (a), section 506 of the National Endowment

14 for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4415) shall continue to

15 apply with respect to any funds received by the National

16 Endowment for Democracy from the United States Gov17 ernment on or before the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Robert SMITH, Appellant, v. Deborah SMITH, Appellee.

No. 80-893.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 2, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1981.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Mallory H. Horton, Miami, for appellant.

Lamchick, Glucksman & Johnston and Steven G. Glucksman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated, by either the appeal or cross-appeal, with respect to the trial judge’s rulings concerning lump-sum alimony and related issues in the judgment under review. *Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); *Yandell v. Yandell,*39 So.2d 554, 557 (Fla.1949); *Rosen v. Rosen,*386 So.2d 1268, 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981). The court erred only in partitioning an en-tireties interest in real property known as 100 Mile Stable in the absence of an appropriate request in the pleadings and compliance with the requirements of Chapter 64, Florida Statutes (1979). *Sanders v. Sanders,*351 So.2d 1126 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), and cases cited. That provision of the judgment below is therefore reversed. It is otherwise entirely affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000381

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

MARK MALAGODI and JANET JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v. CAMERON E. NICE and MARTHA J. JACOBSEN, aka MARTHA J. JACOBSEN-NICE, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants, and AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 5CCV-22-0000027)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for immediate Relief from Judgements [sic], filedApril 29, 2024, by self-represented Defendants/CounterclaimantsAppellants Cameron E. Nice and Martha J. Jacobsen aka Martha J. Jacobsen-Nice (together, Nice Parties), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that:

(1) The Nice Parties seek reconsideration of the April 26, 2024 order dismissing the motions they filed on March 25, 2024. The Nice Parties also seek "immediate relief from judgments" and to dismiss with prejudice the complaint filed in the underlying case, 5CCV-22-0000027; and

(2) The Nice Parties fail to demonstrate the court overlooked or misapprehended any point of law or fact in the Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000381 03-MAY-2024 07:49 AM Dkt. 52 ODMRNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

April 26, 2024 order. Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). In addition, because the court dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction on June 26, 2023, it will dismiss the Nice Parties claims for relief in the Motion for immediate Relief from Judgements [sic].

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is denied and the Motion for immediate Relief from Judgements [sic] is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 3, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000702756
<NAME> SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                       525
<INVENTORY>                                      4,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,649
<PP&E>                                          16,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,723
<BONDS>                                          4,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           307
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,749
<SALES>                                         28,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,109
<CGS>                                           17,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,941
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,510)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,510)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clifford SHAMBLIN.

No. 54827.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 11, 1974.

William E. Woodward, Clinton, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon A. Picou, Jr., Dist. Atty., W. Lee Overton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Cynthia Picou, Sp. Counsel to Dist. Atty., St. Francisville, for plaintiff-appellee.

SUMMERS, Justice.

Defendant, Clifford Shamblin, was charged by bill of information with simple escape on July 5, 1973 in violation of Article 110, subd. A(l) of the Criminal Code. *321He was represented by court appointed counsel and pleaded not guilty. He was tried by a jury of twelve which returned a verdict of guilty on October 16, 1973.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is the correctness of the ruling of the trial judge denying a change of venue. The motion for change of venue was filed on the day of trial. It came too late. Article 621 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires that it be made “at least five days prior to the date then fixed for commencement of trial.”

Inspection of the pleadings and proceedings failed to reveal any error. La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 920.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# Monaco

30 items

        -    Report  		Monaco	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		France and Monaco	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Monaco	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Monaco	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Monaco	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		France and Monaco	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Monaco	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Monaco (15-709) – Employment Work Agreement for Dependents of Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts Assigned to Official Duty in the Respective Countries	  July 9, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Monaco (10-311) – Agreement for the Exchange of Information Relating to Tax Matters	  January 11, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Monaco (07-701) – Agreement Regarding the Sharing of Confiscated Proceeds of Crime or Property	  July 1, 2007 

previous page123

Back to Top
§ 560.512 Iranian Government missions in the United States. ( a ) The importation of goods or services into the United States by, and the provision of goods or services in the United States to, the diplomatic missions of the Government of Iran to international organizations in the United States, and the Iranian Interests Section of the Embassy of Pakistan (or any successor protecting power) in the United States are authorized, provided that: ( 1 ) The goods or services are for the conduct of the official business of the missions or the Iranian Interests Section, or for personal use of the employees of the missions or the Iranian Interests Section, and are not for resale;
( 2 ) The transaction does not involve the purchase, sale, financing, or refinancing of real property;
( 3 ) The transaction is not otherwise prohibited by law; and
( 4 ) The transaction is conducted through an account at a U.S. financial institution specifically licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Note to paragraph ( a
)(4) of § 560.512 :
U.S. financial institutions are required to obtain specific licenses to operate accounts for, or extend credit to, the diplomatic missions of the Government of Iran to international organizations in the United States, or the Iranian Interests Section of the Embassy of Pakistan (or any successor protecting power) in the United States.
( b ) The importation of goods or services into the United States by, and the provision of goods or services in the United States to, the employees of the diplomatic missions of the Government of Iran to international organizations in the United States, and the employees of the Iranian Interests Section of the Embassy of Pakistan (or any successor protecting power) in the United States, are authorized, provided that: ( 1 ) The goods or services are for personal use of the employees of the missions or the Iranian Interests Section, and are not for resale; and
( 2 ) The transaction is not otherwise prohibited by law.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2728 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2728

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 1995

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(36) The Old Spanish Trail, beginning in Santa Fe, New 
        Mexico, proceeding through Colorado and Utah, and ending in Los 
        Angeles, California, and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish 
        Trail, beginning near Espanola, New Mexico, proceeding through 
        Colorado, and ending near Crescent Junction, Utah.''
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1008.53 Affected parties.

An advisory opinion issued by the OIG will have no application to any individual or entity that does not join in the request for the opinion. No individual or entity other than the requestor(s) may rely on an advisory opinion.
HomeJapan

# Japan

594 items

        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-1219A) – Memorandum of Understanding Additional to the Agreement for Cooperation on the Development and Operations Activity of the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission	  December 19, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-1219) – Agreement for Cooperation of Development and Operations Activity of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GOP) Mission	  December 19, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-1201.1) – Agreement Amending the Agreement of April 24, 1995, as Amended, Concerning Cross-Waiver of Liability for Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Space for Peaceful Purposes	  December 1, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-1201) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation on the Joint Program Between the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Satellite	  December 1, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-522) – Agreement Extending the Agreement on the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-E (AMSR-E) Program	  May 22, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (08-101) – Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures	  January 1, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (07-810) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Military Information	  August 10, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (06-721.3) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  July 21, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (06.721.2) – Agreement for Cooperation in Research and Development Concerning Nuclear Material Control and Accounting Measures for Safeguards and Nonproliferation	  July 21, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (06-623.1) – Agreement Regarding Defense Cooperation	  June 23, 2006 

previous page1…555657585960next page

Back to Top