alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40505.

#### CRESCENT BRASS & PIN COMPANY v. OWEN.

Decided March 16, 1964.

*Warren C. Fortson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith & Undercofler, William E. Smith,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

Charles Owen sued Crescent Brass & Pin Company, his former employer, for $1,250, allegedly due him on a severance of employment agreement, a copy of which was attached to the petition as an exhibit. Insofar as material to the question for consideration by this court it is sufficient to state that the instrument purported to contain a promise by the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,250, contingent on the condition that the plaintiff immediately “turn over and relinquish all keys, credit cards, tools, data, and everything not [of] a personal nature to the management of [Crescent Brass & Pin Company] and on the further [condition] that [the plaintiff does] not in any way, manner or form cause injury to the reputation and welfare of [this company].” The instrument sued on was in the form of a letter addressed to the plaintiff and signed by the secretary and general manager and by the vice-president and assistant general manager of the defendant offering to pay to the plaintiff $1,250, subject to the above-quoted conditions.

Assuming, but not deciding, that performance by the plaintiff of the conditions precedent would constitute sufficient consideration for the promise by the defendant company to pay the plaintiff $1,250, the petition wholly fails to allege that the plaintiff had done those things which were clearly intended by the offeror as conditions precedent to any obligation under its promise. For this reason the petition failed to state a cause of action, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. *Code*§ 20-110; *Jenkins v. Gordy,*105 Ga. App. 255 (124 SE2d 303). That error rendered further proceedings in the case nugatory. *Jones v. Hurst,*91 Ga. 338, 341 (3) (17 SE 635); *370*Musgrove v. Musgrove,*213 Ga. 610, 612 (4) (100 SE2d 577); *Georgia, Ashburn &c. R. Co. v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co.,*79 Ga. App. 837 (2) (54 SE2d 492); *Millender v. Looper,*82 Ga. App. 563 (61 SE2d 573).

The fact that the plaintiff may have testified, without objection, on the trial, that he had done those things stated in the letter to be conditions precedent to the defendant’s obligation to pay would not be sufficient to cure the error in failing to sustain the defendant’s demurrer to the petition. *Gunter v. King,*46 Ga. App. 297 (2) (167 SE 549).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Parnell, J., concur.*
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #32, August 19 – 25, 2009 

An overall above average wet season for Afghanistan has 

given way to more seasonal dry weather during the summer. 

During the winter months a deep snow pack developed across 

the central highlands and northeast mountains. As 

temperatures began to warm during the spring months, as is 

typical, the snow began to melt. The snow melt combined with 

rainfall triggered flooding. 

Snow pack now remains confined to the highest elevations of 

the northeast, as is typical for the summer. 

During July and early August, above-normal temperatures 

prevailed across the lowlands of Afghanistan with cooler-thannormal temperatures in northeast Afghanistan. 

During the next week, seasonal dry weather should be 

accompanied by above-normal temperatures in the lowlands 

(Figure 2). Maximum temperatures should exceed 40 °C 

across southwestern Afghanistan (Figure 3). Although not 

depicted on the hazards map, occasional dust storms will 

reduce visibilities in western and southern Afghanistan. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Temperature Anomaly for August 17 - 24, 2009. 

 Source: COLA

Figure 3. Extreme Maximum Temperature (°C) for 

August 17 - 24, 2009.

Source: NOAA/CPC
#### Ronald C. BRUNS, Appellant, v. COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, Appellee.

No. 54381.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1, 1979.

Ronald C. Bruns, in pro. per.

Donald A. Pickworth, Collier County Atty., Naples, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s contentions are without merit. The final judgment of May 15,1978 validating bonds is affirmed.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the Record Communications; Notice Regarding 
Prior Notice

August 25, 2009.
    On August 24, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
published in the Federal Register a Public Notice in Docket No. RM98-1-
000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 74 FR 42671 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission inadvertently published this document in the Federal 
Register and the notice should be disregarded.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20937 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...the United States Presidents Emergency Plan for Aids Relief  Releases

# The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Releases

99 items

        -    Video Remarks  		Remarks for the Bush Institute’s 20th Anniversary of PEPFAR	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 24, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at PEPFAR 20th Anniversary Event	  Wendy R. ShermanFebruary 24, 2023U.S. Institute of PeaceWashington, DC 
        -    		PEPFAR at CROI 2023	  February 19, 2023 
        -    		2023 Country and Regional Operational Plan Guidance and Technical Considerations	   
        -    PEPFAR Statement  		Statement From Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong on the 20th Anniversary of PEPFAR: 20 Years of Impact	  John N. NkengasongJanuary 28, 2023 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		The US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Celebrates 20 Years of Unprecedented Global Impact in the Fight to End HIV/AIDS	  January 28, 2023 
        -    		Celebrating 20 Years of PEPFAR	   
        -    PEPFAR Release  		PEPFAR invests nearly $1.2 billion to support 325,000 health workers across Africa	  December 13, 2022 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		PEPFAR sets bold manufacturing targets for Africa	  December 13, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Plans for a Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 13, 2022 

previous page12345…10next page

Back to Top
#### Allan J. ENDRIES and Ted A. Johns, Appellants, v. LIPIN ENTERPRISES, INC., an Illinois corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James Stewart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 599.506 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 599.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 599.507, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 599.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 599.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 599.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 599.506 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 361.4 Preparation of shipment.

Each shipment shall be inspected and verified by two responsible employees of a consignor before final preparation (*i.e.*, before sealing, locking, etc.) for delivery to the carrier. The shipment shall be finally prepared for delivery in the presence of the two employees and before leaving their immediate control. If strict compliance herewith is impossible or impracticable, administrative officers of the consignor shall make adequate provision, through the establishment of accounting controls or otherwise, for the maintenance of basic records which will enable them to prove, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, the extent of loss, destruction, or damage in connection with a claim against the Fund. The requirements of this section shall apply irrespective of the carrier or method of transportation employed in making shipments.
#### Charles E. Ellis, Respondent, *v.*Frank Seaman, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff,

Percival S. Jones, for appellant.

Daniel S. Decker, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

There is no question of fraud or warranty in the case. The only issue raised by the pleadings and exceptions is with respect to the terms of the contract and-its performance. What the agreement was is evidenced- by the- written order'which was given for the advertisements in question.' It .contained .all of *759the elements of a complete contract, and, under familiar principles, cannot be enlarged or varied by parol evidence. The only matter which remains to be considered is whether there was a substantial performance with respect to the quality of the work. This was a question of fact which it was peculiarly within the province of the court below to determine, and we cannot say that such. determination was so plainly against the weight of evidence as to justify us in reversing the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmah, ;P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerioh, JJ.

'Judgment affirmed, with costs..
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2833 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2833

To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to require 
that perishable agricultural products be labeled or marked as to their 
                           country of origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 1995

  Ms. Kaptur (for herself and Mrs. Thurman) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to require 
that perishable agricultural products be labeled or marked as to their 
                           country of origin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING OF PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL 
              COMMODITIES.

    (a) Labeling Required.--Section 14 of the Perishable Agricultural 
Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499n), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Country of Origin Labeling.--(1) The Secretary shall carry 
out a nationwide program to require perishable agricultural commodities 
(or the bins, display cases, or similar containers holding such 
perishable agricultural commodities) to be labeled, marked, or 
otherwise clearly identified at the retail level as to their country of 
origin.
    ``(2) The program shall apply to imported and domestic perishable 
agricultural commodities, including perishable agricultural commodities 
that are exempted, under section 304(a)(3)(J) of the Tariff Act of 1930 
(19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3)(J)), from the country of origin marking 
requirements of that Act.''.
    (b) Penalties.--Subsection (b) of such section is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or country of origin label required'' 
        after ``certificate issued''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or label'' after ``certificate'' the 
        last place it appears.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``Sec. 14'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 14. INSPECTION AND LABELING OF PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL 
              COMMODITIES.''.

    (d) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this section 
shall apply with respect to perishable agricultural commodities 
marketed on or after one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005152EN.01000101.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 June 2005

(2005/C 152/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2111 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4469 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66515 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2711 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5419 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,54 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,876 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,871 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0408 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 129 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,45 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,314 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6435 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5601 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4931 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4082 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6948 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0252 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 223,7 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1773 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0237 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3251 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 704,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6032 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,355 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,657 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,883 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2111

JPY

Japanese yen

131,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4469

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66515

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2711

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5419

ISK

Iceland króna

79,54

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,876

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

29,871

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0408

ROL

Romanian leu

36 129

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,45

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,314

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6435

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5601

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4931

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4082

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6948

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0252

KRW

South Korean won

1 223,7

ZAR

South African rand

8,1773

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0237

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3251

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 704,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6032

PHP

Philippine peso

67,355

RUB

Russian rouble

34,657

THB

Thai baht

49,883

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 599.302 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part, and with respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 599.201 or on whom other sanctions are imposed, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked or that other sanctions are imposed on such person.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property or imposition of other sanctions is published in the Federal Register.
#### § 583.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 583.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 583.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.
# Netherlands

147 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Sint Maarten	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Welcoming Proceedings at the International Court of Justice to Hold the Syrian Regime Accountable	  Matthew MillerJune 14, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Transatlantic Fellow Program Deepens Bonds Between United States and Europe	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Dutch Foreign Minister Hoekstra	  May 16, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Netherlands	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to The Hague, the Netherlands, May 11-18	  May 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the 2nd U.S.-Netherlands Cyber Dialogue	  May 9, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Kingdom of the Netherlands National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2023 
        -    		Special Online Briefing with David M. Turk, Deputy Secretary of Energy	  April 4, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Online Briefing with Uzra Zeya, Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy and Human Rights.	  Uzra ZeyaMarch 31, 2023Brussels Media Hub  

previous page12345…15next page

Back to Top
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #26, July 8 - 14, 2009 

An overall above average wet season for Afghanistan has 

given way to more typical dry weather during the summer. 

During the winter months an usually deep snow pack built up. 

As temperatures began to warm during the spring months, as 

is typical, the snow began to melt. However, precipitation 

continued, causing numerous rain-on-snow events. These 

events are known to cause rapid snow melt. As a resulted 

many parts of Afghanistan reported flooding triggered by melt 

water. 

In June much of the country dried out, but also temperatures 

changed from running above normal in the low lands, to more 

seasonable temperatures. Temperatures in the northeast 

have remained slightly cooler than normal. 

Snow pack now remains confined to the higher elevations of 

the northeast, as is typically for this time of year. 

The coming week will continue to bring dry, warm weather to 

much of the country, although cooler conditions are likely to 

remain in the northeast. 

During the next week, seasonal dry weather should be 

accompanied by above-normal temperatures in the lowlands 

(Figure 2). Maximum temperatures may exceed 45 °C across 

southwest Afghanistan (Figure 3). 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Temperature Anomaly for July 7 – 13, 2009. 

 Source: COLA

Figure 3. Extreme Maximum Temperature (°C) for 

July 7 – 13, 2009.

Source: NOAA/CPC
No. 99-8665.

#### Biggs *v.*Borg, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2005187EN.01000501.xml

| 30.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3841 — Valoriza Gestion/Aguas de las Palmas)

(2005/C 187/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---