alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HASCO DEVELOPMENT CORP., Appellant, v. DOBY SALES CORPORATION, d/b/a Doby Brick and Supply, Larry Wilson, d/b/a Wilson & Sons, Appellees.

No. 77-2569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 21, 1979.

Rehearing Denied March 20, 1979.

Stephen A. Rapp of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser, Stewart & Hersey, P. A., Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard S. Thayer of Richard S. Thayer, P. A. and Stanley W. Cheff, Boca Raton, for appellees.

*605PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

specially concurring:

This is a garnishment case involving a contest between the appellee-debtor’s judgment creditor and the appellant-contractor with whom the debtor had sub-contracted to do plastering work. Although the appellant-contractor had funds on hand due to the debtor when served with the writ of garnishment, it later claimed that it might be liable to other persons who had supplied the debtor. In rejecting this claim by appellant it is implicit in the trial court’s holding that no superior claims to the funds held by appellant were presented and proven, either by the appellant or the alleged suppliers of the debtor. Here, relying upon *Eger Block & Redi-Mix Co. v. Wheeler,*207 So.2d 698 (Fla.2d DCA 1968), the appellant claims it had no burden to prove that it was legally obligated to pay the suppliers since the failure to pay them would result in damage to the appellant’s “reputation and credit rating” and hinder appellant in securing suppliers for future projects. First, I think appellant is incorrect in interpreting *Eger Block*as allowing a garnishee to withhold funds to pay suppliers to whom the garnishee has no legal liability. Secondly, I think the appellant is wrong in claiming that it had no burden to prove such legal liabilities and that the judgment creditor should have had the burden to prove such claims were not valid. The garnishment statutes adequately provide for resolution of such disputes, including allowing third parties to make claims to the funds garnished. No third parties acted here, and I think the trial court was correct in its conclusion that the judgment creditor had demonstrated a superior legal claim to the funds held by the appellant.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 289

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository

institutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving

depository institutions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Savings and Loan

5 Asset Recovery Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS INVOLV7 ING DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.

8 Section 951 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Re9 covery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1833a)

10 is amended by adding at the end the following:
2

HR 289 IH

1 ‘‘(g) CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS.—A

2 person may bring a civil action to assess a civil penalty

3 for a violation referred to in subsection (c) in the same

4 manner and subject to the same procedures as a person

5 may bring an action under section 3730 of title 31, United

6 States Code, for a violation of section 3729 of such title.’’.

Æ
§ 802.229 Parent. ( a ) The term *parent* means, with respect to an entity: ( 1 ) A person who or which directly or indirectly: ( i ) Holds or will hold at least 50 percent of the outstanding voting interest in the entity; or
( ii ) Holds or will hold the right to at least 50 percent of the profits of the entity, or has or will have the right in the event of dissolution to at least 50 percent of the assets of the entity; or
( 2 ) The general partner, managing member, or equivalent of the entity.
( b ) Any entity that meets the conditions of paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section with respect to another entity (*i.e.,* the intermediate parent) is also a parent of any other entity of which the intermediate parent is a parent.
( c ) Examples: ( 1 ) *Example 1.* Corporation P holds 50 percent of the voting interest in Corporations R and S; Corporation R holds 40 percent of the voting interest in Corporation X; and Corporation S holds 50 percent of the voting interest in Corporation Y, which in turn holds 50 percent of the voting interest in Corporation Z. Corporation P is a parent of Corporations R, S, Y, and Z, but not of Corporation X. Corporation S is a parent of Corporation Y and Z, and Corporation Y is a parent of Corporation Z.
( 2 ) *Example 2.* Corporation A holds warrants which when exercised will entitle it to vote 50 percent of the outstanding shares of Corporation B. Corporation A is a parent of Corporation B.
( 3 ) *Example 3.* Investor A holds 60 percent of the outstanding voting interest in Corporation B. Investor C holds the right to 80 percent of the profits of Corporation B. Each of Investor A and Investor C is a parent of Corporation B.
HomeNiger

# Niger

136 items

        -    Press Statement  		Arrival of Ambassador Kathleen FitzGibbon to Niger	  August 19, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 17, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 17, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 16, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 15, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 14, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 14, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Nigerian President Tinubu	  August 14, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Former Nigerien President Issoufou	  August 11, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		ECOWAS Call for Restoration of Constitutional Order in the Republic of Niger	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 10, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 9, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 9, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum	  August 9, 2023 

previous page12345…14next page

Back to Top
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker license and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License No.
Port nameDavid Meth
04820
Los Angeles.
 Dated: January 15, 2009. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. E9-2067 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
EXHIBIT 99

 

 

 

 

March 29, 2002

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.

Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has represented to Moto Photo, Inc. ("the Company") that Andersen's audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

 

/s/ Joan Drake Durham

Joan Drake Durham

Corporate Counsel and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2909 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2909

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 1996

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Act to 
   provide that the Secretary of the Interior may acquire lands for 
 purposes of that Act only by donation or exchange, or otherwise with 
                 the consent of the owner of the lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Silvio O. Conte National Fish and 
Wildlife Refuge Eminent Domain Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON METHOD OF ACQUISITION OF LANDS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              THE SILVIO O. CONTE NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE REFUGE 
              ACT.

    Section 106 of the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife 
Refuge Act (Public Law 102-212; 16 U.S.C. 668dd note) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Restriction on Method of Acquisition.--The Secretary may 
acquire lands in New Hampshire and Vermont for purposes of this title 
only by donation or exchange, or otherwise with the consent of the 
owner of the lands.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 594.205 Evasions; attempts; conspiracies. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, any transaction by any U.S. person or within the United States on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, any conspiracy formed for the purpose of engaging in a transaction prohibited by this part is prohibited.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Louis WILLIAMS v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 67751.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Louis Williams, applying for writ of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 234-889.

Denied.
# Norway

141 items

        -    Report  		Norway	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Norway	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Norway	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Norway	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (17-119.1) – Agreement Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy	  January 19, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (16-930) – Amendment and Extension to Agreement of October 20, 2000 and November 14, 2001 Concerning Space Cooperation	  September 30, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (15-119) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Defense Test and Evaluation Program (TEP) Cooperation	  January 19, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (14-127) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  January 27, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (13-322) – Agreement on Use of U.S. Land Remote Sensing Satellite Data	  March 22, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Norway (11-718) – Agreement for Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation Projects	  July 18, 2011 

previous page1…1112131415next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Saybolt LP, as a commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, 
Saybolt LP, 1235 Riverside Dr., Suite 202, Memphis, TN 38106, has been 
approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and 
vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions 
of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires 
regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to 
perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f5969785db9994979d84b5919d86db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7b4b5a7f9bbb6b5bfa697b3bfa4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial gauger became 
effective on June 06, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for June 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: August 25, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E9-21101 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 802.205 Completion date. The term *completion date* means, with respect to a transaction, the earliest date upon which the purchase, lease, or concession is made legally effective, or a change in rights that could result in a covered real estate transaction occurs. Note 1 to § 802.205 :
See § 802.304 regarding the timing rule for a contingent equity interest.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2832 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2832

To transfer the Federal Aviation Administration Eastern Regional Office 
                      to Union County, New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 1995

 Mr. Franks of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Frelinghuysen, 
 Mr. Torricelli, and Mr. Martini) introduced the following bill; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To transfer the Federal Aviation Administration Eastern Regional Office 
                      to Union County, New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall move the 
Eastern Regional field office of the Administration to a municipality 
in Union County, New Jersey, with a population of less than 55,000.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6745]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object in the exhibition: “American Stories: Paintings of Everyday Life, 1765-1915,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 5, 2009, until on or about January 24, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The                               ( print page 44895)                            address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

Dated: August 25, 2009.

Maura M. Pally,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-20936 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Janice Renfroe ADAMS v. William N. RENFROE.

No. 51282.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 6, 1979.

Duncan L. Lott, Langston, Lott & Cadle, Booneville, for appellant.

Russell & Russell, Frank A. Russell, Tom Childs, Fulton, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
HomePanama

# Panama

159 items

        -    		Cases Filed Against the Republic of Panama	   
        -    		Third Submission of the United States of America	  December 7, 2018 
        -    Report  		Panama	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Panama	  June 28, 2018 
        -    		Overseas Business Insights, June, 2018	  June 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Panama	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Panama	  April 20, 2018 
        -    		Supplemental Submission of the United States	  September 25, 2017 
        -    		Submission of the United States	  August 28, 2017 
        -    		Omega Engineering LLC and Mr. Oscar Rivera v. The Republic of Panama	   

previous page1…111213141516next page

Back to Top
HomeFiji

# Fiji

68 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		2023 Indo-Pacific Business Forum Promotes Inclusive and Sustainable Growth in the Indo-Pacific	  January 12, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Management John Bass to Visit Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Australia, and Thailand	  November 29, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces the First Cohort of Countries to Endorse the Ocean Conservation Pledge at COP27	  November 16, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Zero-Tolerance for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse:  U.S. and India Conduct National Investigation Officer ‘Training of Trainers’ Course 	  November 8, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Indonesia:  Peacekeeping Exercise Garuda Canti Dharma II Helps Partners Develop Critical Capabilities	  October 18, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Fiji National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 7, 2022 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Governance of the Seas: Assistance to Pacific Island Partners	  September 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Fiji	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Fiji	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to Fiji	  July 11, 2022 

previous page12345…7next page

Back to Top
# C_2005155EN.01002902.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/29

---

Action brought on 29 April 2005 by Borax Europe Ltd. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-166/05)

(2005/C 155/56)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 29 April 2005 by Borax Europe Ltd., established in Guildford (United Kingdom), represented by D. Vandermeersch and K. Nordlander, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission, SG/B/2/IS/md D(2005) 1644, dated 21 February 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission, SG/B/2/IS/md D(2005) 1644, dated 21 February 2005;

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments invoked by the applicant are the same as those invoked in case T-121/05.

---
#### § 801.202 Completion date.

The term *completion date* means, with respect to a transaction, the date upon which an ownership interest, including a contingent equity interest, is conveyed, assigned, delivered, or otherwise transferred to a person, or a change in rights occurs.