alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2853

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 6, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of Bulgaria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2853 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND SUPPLE2 MENTAL ACTION.

3 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds

4 that Bulgaria—

5 (1) has received most-favored-nation treatment

6 since 1991 and has been found to be in full compli7 ance with the freedom of emigration requirements

8 under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 since 1993;

9 (2) has reversed many years of Communist dic10 tatorship and instituted a constitutional republic

11 ruled by a democratically elected government as well

12 as basic market-oriented reforms, including privat13 ization;

14 (3) is in the process of acceding to the General

15 Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the

16 World Trade Organization (WTO), and extension of

17 unconditional most-favored-nation treatment would

18 enable the United States to avail itself of all rights

19 under the GATT and the WTO with respect to Bul20 garia; and

21 (4) has demonstrated a strong desire to build

22 friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the

23 United States on trade matters.

24 (b) SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.—The Congress notes

25 that the United States Trade Representative intends to

26 negotiate with Bulgaria in order to preserve the commit-
3

HR 2853 RFS

1 ments of that country under the bilateral commercial

2 agreement in effect between that country and the United

3 States that are consistent with the GATT and the WTO.

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

5 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO BULGARIA.

6 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN7 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith8 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

9 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

10 (1) determine that such title should no longer

11 apply to Bulgaria; and

12 (2) after making a determination under para13 graph (1) with respect to Bulgaria, proclaim the ex14 tension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most15 favored-nation treatment) to the products of that

16 country.

17 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

18 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub19 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod20 ucts of Bulgaria, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

21 cease to apply to that country.

Passed the House of Representatives March 5,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Taezer Thompson, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR25124

Vs. No. 11-19-00413-CR * November 12, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2005171EN.01000201.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 28 April 2005

in Case C-104/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam St. Paul Dairy Industries NV v Unibel Exser BVBA (1)

1

(Brussels Convention - Provisional, including protective, measures - Hearing of witnesses)

(2005/C 171/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-104/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling pursuant to the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands), made by decision of 12 December 2002, received at the Court on 6 March 2003, in the proceedings between St. Paul Dairy Industries NV and Unibel Exser BVBA — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič and E. Levits, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General, M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 April 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

St. Paul Dairy Industries NV

Unibel Exser BVBA

Article 24 of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, of Ireland and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, by the Convention of 25 October 1982 on the Accession of the Hellenic Republic, by the Convention of 26 May 1989 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic and by the Convention of 29 November 1996 on the Accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden, must be interpreted as meaning that a measure ordering the hearing of a witness for the purpose of enabling the applicant to decide whether to bring a case, determine whether it would be well founded and assess the relevance of evidence which might be adduced in that regard is not covered by the notion of ‘provisional, including protective, measures’.

---

(1)  JO C 101, 26.04.2003.

1

---
#### Patricia JUNOD and Robert Benedict, Appellants, v. In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Kenneth P. FOSTER, Incompetent, and Virginia Foster, as guardian of the person of Kenneth P. Foster, an Incompetent, Appellees.

No. 74-730.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Paul T. Douglas, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2005155EN.01000401.xml

| 25.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Firenze, Sezione 33, by order of that court of 23 March 2005 in the proceedings between Villa Maria Beatrice Hospital Srl and Agenzia Entrate — Ufficio Firenze 1

(Case C-155/05)

(2005/C 155/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Firenze, Sezione 33 (Florence Regional Tax Court, Section 33) (Italy) of 23 March 2005, received at the Court Registry on 6 April 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Villa Maria Beatrice Hospital Srl and Agenzia Entrate — Ufficio Firenze 1 on the following question:

Is paragraph 27d of Article 10 of Presidential Decree No 633 of 26 October 1972 compatible with subparagraph (c) of Article 13B (‘Other exemptions’) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ L 145 of 13.06.1977, p. 1.

1

---
# Guinea

		Subscribe		

69 items

        -    		Guinea	  April 22, 2019 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Guinea Memorandum of Consultations of March 19, 2018	  March 19, 2018 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Guinea Air Transport Agreement Initialed March 19, 2018	  March 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Guinea	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2891

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of service

connection for certain specified diseases and disabilities in the case of

veterans who were exposed during military service to carbon tetrachloride.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1996

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of service connection for certain specified diseases and disabilities in the case of veterans who were

exposed during military service to carbon tetrachloride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTION

4 WITH RESPECT TO EXPOSURE TO CARBON

5 TETRACHLORIDE.

6 Section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:
2

•HR 2891 IH

1 ‘‘(d)(1) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title,

2 and subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title,

3 in the case of a veteran who served for ninety days or

4 more in active military, naval, or air service and who while

5 in such service was exposed to carbon tetrachloride, any

6 disease or disability specified in paragraph (2) becoming

7 manifest in such veteran shall be considered to have been

8 incurred in or aggravated by such service, notwithstanding

9 that there is no record of evidence of such disease during

10 the period of such service.

11 ‘‘(2) Diseases and disabilities referred to in para12 graph (1) are the following:

13 ‘‘(A) Depleted vision or floater cataracts.

14 ‘‘(B) Hearing impairments such as high-pitch

15 ringing, sensitivity to loud noises, and loss of hear16 ing.

17 ‘‘(C) Memory losses such as lapses of recall,

18 dates, numbers, and inverting numbers and letters.

19 ‘‘(D) Growths.

20 ‘‘(E) Swelling of hands or feet.

21 ‘‘(F) Aching bones or joints throughout the

22 body (not associated with arthritis).

23 ‘‘(G) Loss of hair.

24 ‘‘(H) Deterioration of nervous system.’’.

Æ
EX-10.44



 Exhibit 10.44 
 WHITEBOX 
 FORBEARANCE EXTENSION LETTER 

July 16, 2012 
 VIA
FEDERAL EXPRESS, FACSIMILE AND EMAIL 
 Delta Petroleum Corporation 
 370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4300 
 Denver, CO 80202 

Attention: Chief Financial Officer 
 Telecopier
No.: (303) 298-8251 
  

	 	RE:	Extension of Forbearance Period 


Reference is hereby made to that certain First Forbearance Agreement dated as of July 3, 2012 by and among Delta Petroleum
Corporation (“Borrower”), the Guarantors party thereto (the “Guarantors”), the Lenders party thereto, Whitebox Advisors LLC, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and collateral agent
(“Collateral Agent”) (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Forbearance Agreement”). Unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein without
definition shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Forbearance Agreement. 
 Pursuant to Section 4 of the
Forbearance Agreement, Borrower has requested that the date set forth in clause (i) of Section 4 of the Forbearance Agreement be extended from July 16, 2012 to July 30, 2012. Administrative Agent, on behalf of the Lenders, has
agreed to extend such date from July 16, 2012 to July 30, 2012 (the “Extension”). 
 Except as
expressly amended hereby. the Forbearance Agreement and the other Loan Documents are ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms. The terms of this letter (the
“Letter”) shall not be deemed (i) a waiver of any Default or Event of Default, (ii) a consent, waiver or modification with respect to any term, condition or obligation of the Borrower or any other Loan Party in the
Forbearance Agreement or any other Loan Document except as expressly set forth herein, (iii) a consent, waiver or modification with respect to any other event, condition (whether now existing or hereafter occurring) or provision of the Loan
Documents or (vi) to prejudice any right to remedy which the Administrative Agent or any Lender may now or in the future have under or in connection with the Forbearance Agreement or any other Loan Document. This Letter and the Extension
provided for herein shall not obligate the Administrative Agent and/or Lenders to grant any further waivers or extensions of any kind whatsoever. This Letter shall constitute a Loan Document. 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURES FOLLOW] 

  
 3033 Excelsior Boulevard |
Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 
 612-253-6001 | fax 612-253-6151 | www.whiteboxadvisors.com 








 
			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Whitebox Advisors LLC, as the Administrative Agent
		
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	Clint Semm
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


 With a copy to: 
 Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP 
 1550 17th Street 

Suite 500 
 Denver Colorado 80202 

Attention: Ronald Levine, II. 
 Telecopier No.:
(303)-892-7400
# CA2005232EN.01000101.xml

| 21.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 232/1

---

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY FISHERIES CONTROL AGENCY

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY FISHERIES CONTROL AGENCY

(Grade A*14)

COM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

The Community Fisheries Control Agency is seeking to appoint its Director.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The Director will be appointed by the Administrative Board of the Agency from a list of candidates selected and proposed by the European Commission. He/she will be appointed as a member of the temporary staff at grade A*14 pursuant to Article 2a of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities for a period of five years that may be extended once for a further period of up to five years. The Agency and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application form and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following addresses:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

or

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

The delay for the receipt of applications is 21 October 2005 (the postmark will serve as proof of the date of sending).

21 October 2005

---
HomePalau

# Palau

		Bio		

77 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Taylor V. Ruggles, Department of State Senior Advisor for COFA Implementation, and Keone Nakoa, Department of the Interior Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular and International Affairs	  Digital Press Briefing with Taylor V. Ruggles, Department of State Senior Advisor for COFA Implementation, and Keone Nakoa, Department of the Interior Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular and International AffairsMarch 19, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Enactment of Compact-Related Legislation	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 9, 2024 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Strengthening Climate Security Through Enhanced Security Sector Governance	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Palau National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with the Republic of the Marshall Islands Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Ading, the Federated States of Micronesia President Simina, and Palau President Whipps	  September 26, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Federated States of Micronesia President Wesley Simina, Palau President Surangel Whipps, Jr., and Republic of the Marshall Islands Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Jack Ading Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 26, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, D.C.  
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Completion of the Palau Bilateral Economic Consultation Meetings	  June 23, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		USTDA Technical Assistance Grant for Network Modernization in the Republic of Palau	  June 21, 2023 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### Sidney HONEA, Appellant, v. WALKER CHEMICAL & EXTERMINATING CO., INC., Appellee.

No. 79-188.

Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1981.

Fred S. Disselkoen, Jr. of Duffett, Seps & Akers, Ormond Beach, for appellant.

William A. Greenberg of Fowler, Williams & Airth, Orlando, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

The employment agreement sued on here contained a provision that venue for any suit brought thereunder would be in the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida.1

In the action for breach of the employment agreement filed by the employer in Orange County, the employee moved to abate and transfer the cause to Volusia County, where he resides and where he alleges the cause of action accrued, contending that the contractual provision was unenforceable. The trial court denied the motion and this appeal follows.2 We affirm.

It has long been the law of Florida that parties to a contract may agree on venue for actions to enforce the contract. *Producers Supply, Inc. v. Harz,*149 Fla. 594, 6 So.2d 375 (1942); *Felkel v. Abernethy,*112 Fla. 358, 150 So. 631 (1933). See also, *Tropicana Pools, Inc. v. Brown,*270 So.2d 751 (Fla.2d DCA 1972).

Appellant’s reliance on *Gates v. Stucco Corp.,*112 So.2d 36 (Fla.3d DCA 1959) and on *Huntley v. Alejandre,*139 So.2d 911 (Fla.3d DCA 1962) is misplaced, because in *Gates,*there was no contractual provision to support the claim of venue, only an alleged *1211oral agreement which was in violation of the rule requiring stipulations to be in writing, with an attorney who did not appear in the suit, and in *Huntley,*the contract provided that suits thereon would be brought only in the courts of Havana, Cuba, which was an ineffectual attempt to oust the *jurisdiction*of all courts except the courts of Cuba. Jurisdiction is not involved here, only venue, which is a privilege that can be waived. *Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. McDaniel, 78*So.2d 100 (Fla. 1955); *Fixel v. Clevenger,*285 So.2d 687 (Fla.3d DCA 1973).

The order appealed from is

AFFIRMED.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

1

. *“VENUE:*The Employer and Employee hereby mutually agree that the venue for any suit seeking any relief under the terms of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, shall be the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida; the Employee hereby waiving his right to be sued in any other Court in the County where the Employee may reside, if other than Orange County, Florida.”

2

. Rule 9.130(3)(A), Fla.R.App.P.
HomePortugal

# Portugal

68 items

        -    TIAS  		Portugal (10-201.18) – Instrument Amending the Convention of May 7, 1908 on Extradition	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (05-119) – Amendment to Agreement of May 30, 1974 and June 30, 1975 Regarding Defense Assistance	  January 19, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (13101) – Air Transport Agreement	  May 9, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (13096) – Agreement for the Recovery of Maintenance	  March 17, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (95-1218) – Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  December 18, 1995 
        -    TIAS  		Portugal (95-1121) – Agreement on Cooperation and Defense	  November 21, 1995 
        -    DS Memorial  		James Wright	  February 22, 1943 
        -    		James Wright	  February 22, 1943 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 351.29 What are the maturity periods of bonds with issue dates of May 1, 1997, through April 1, 2005? ( a ) *Original maturity* — ( 1 ) *Bonds with issue dates from May 1, 1997, to May 1, 2003.* Bonds reach original maturity at 17 years after issue date.
( 2 ) *Bonds with issue dates of June 1, 2003, through April 1, 2005.* Bonds reach original maturity at 20 years after issue date.
( b ) *Final maturity.* Bonds reach final maturity at 30 years after the issue date. Bonds cease to earn interest at final maturity.
[68 FR 24796, May 8, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 17288, Apr. 5, 2005]
HomePalestinian Territories

# Palestinian Territories

506 items

        -    Press Statement  		West Bank Violence	  Matthew MillerApril 15, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 11, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant	  April 10, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 8, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 8, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Spanish State Secretary for Foreign and Global Affairs Martínez Belío	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024Brussels Melsbroek AirportBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And U.S-EU Trade and Technology Council Ministerial Co-Chairs At Sixth U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024Faculty ClubLeuven, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Solo Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2024NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Timothy Lenderking, Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingApril 3, 2024Dubai Hub 

previous page1…45678…51next page

Back to Top
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10271 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIME MORALES-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-383-P

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Court-appointed counsel for Jaime Morales-Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Morales-Alvarado has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherresponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.