alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1003.1220 Determinations regarding the amount of penalties.

In determining the amount of the penalty in accordance with this subpart, the OIG will consider the factors listed in § 1003.140.
#### § 20.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the Department of the Treasury; or

(2) A(n) Department of the Treasury awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 20.605 and 20.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) Department of the Treasury awarding official | A, D and E. |
#### *J.*August Eckel, complainant, *v.*Elmer J. Williams et al., defendants.

[Decided July 26th, 1929.]

*Mr. Charles E. Cottrell,*for the motion.

Buchanan, V. C.

This is a foreclosure suit to which there are four defendants. Subpoena *ad respondendum*was issued by complainant’s solicitor and returned to the clerk with no sheriff’s return, but with an affidavit by complainant that he had served two of the defendants, and an affidavit by complainant’s solicitor that he had served the other two. The clerk declined to accept and file this as a proof of valid service; whereupon complainant makes the present application—relying on *West*v. *Smith, 2 N. J. Eq. 309.*

It is true that in that case it is stated that service need not necessarily be made by a sheriff or coroner — that “it may be served by any other competent person.” There is no definition as to who may constitute such class of “competent persons.” *West*v. *Smith,*however, was decided in 1840, long prior to the amendment of 1880 (P. *L. 1880 p. 24)*to section 13 of the Chancery act then in force; which amendment required service thereafter to be made by the “same officers now authorized to serve writs of summons and other common law processes.” Essentially the same requirement is found in section 3 of the present Chancery act. P. *L. 1902 p. 511.*

*75Moreover the chancellor said, in *West*v. Smith, *sufra:*

> “It is certainly proper in all ordinary cases that the process of the court should be served by the sheriff or other officer known to the law,” indicating thereby that in order for the court to sanction service by a private person, good and sufficient reason should be shown why service in the usual way could not be made. In that case the process was directed against the sheriff himself and there was no coroner in the county.

In the present case there is no proof before the court of .any circumstances showing that any situation out of the ordinary exists. The reason offered orally by complainant’s .solicitor as sufficient to justify service by a private person, is that “he had no definite address for the defendants and was compelled to locate them himself.” Assuming this “reason” to be properly before the court, it is obvious that it in nowise is sufficient to avoid the requirement of service by the sheriff. If the complainant’s solicitor could by himself locate the defendants, he could equally well have done so .accompanied by the sheriff or his deputy — and can still do so.

It is not necessary here to determine whether or not service of process to respond must be made in all instances by one of the statutory officials; it is sufficient to decide that service must be made in that manner where it does not appear that such service is not feasible.

Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2969 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2969

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts by repealing the Tea Importation 
                              Act of 1897.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Tea Tasters Repeal Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TEA IMPORTATION ACT OF 1897.

    The Tea Importation Act (21 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) is repealed.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report [electronicresource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:K 84/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635579
 
September 16, 2019
# Belgium

251 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs Russo Travels to Belgium, Brunei, Thailand, and Laos	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg	  November 28, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 28, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  November 28, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 28, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 28, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Ambassador James O’Brien	  James O’BrienNovember 27, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien On the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Belgium	  James O’BrienNovember 27, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Belgium, North Macedonia, Israel, the West Bank, and the U.A.E., November 27-December 2, 2023	   
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Belgium, North Macedonia, Israel, the West Bank, and the U.A.E.	  Matthew MillerNovember 25, 2023 

previous page123456…26next page

Back to Top
# C_2005182EN.01002502.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München by order of that court of 17 April 2005 in Sachsenmilch AG v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

(Case C-196/05)

(2005/C 182/47)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht München (Finance Court, Munich) (Germany) of 17 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 4 May 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Sachsenmilch AG and Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg on the following questions:

| (1) | Is the Combined Nomenclature (CN) in the version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 (1) of 11 September 2003 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (2) on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and the Common Customs Tariff (CCT) to be interpreted as meaning that pizza cheese (mozzarella) that was stored after its manufacture for one to two weeks at 2 to 4° C is to be classified under subheading 0406 10 CN? |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Is the Combined Nomenclature (CN) in the version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 (1) of 11 September 2003 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (2) on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and the Common Customs Tariff (CCT) to be interpreted as meaning that pizza cheese (mozzarella) that was stored after its manufacture for one to two weeks at 2 to 4° C is to be classified under subheading 0406 10 CN?

1

2

| (2) | In the absence of Community rules, may the examination of whether cheese is fresh cheese within the meaning of subheading 0406 10 CN be carried out on the basis of organoleptic features? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the absence of Community rules, may the examination of whether cheese is fresh cheese within the meaning of subheading 0406 10 CN be carried out on the basis of organoleptic features?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 281, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

2

---
# Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Releases

92 items

        -    Media Note  		2023 Service to America Medal Winners – Jennifer Harkins and Fletcher Schoen	  October 17, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Military Coup d’Etat in Niger	  Matthew MillerOctober 10, 2023 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Iranian Persons Connected to Wrongful Detentions	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On Iran’s Release of Unjustly Detained U.S. Citizens	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs Carstens Travel to Aspen	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Congratulations to Department of State Employees Named as 2023 Service to America Medal Finalists	  May 8, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Sanctioning Russian Federation and Iranian State Actors Responsible for the Wrongful Detention of U.S. Nationals	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Politically Motivated Conviction of Vladimir Kara-Murza	  Vedant PatelApril 17, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Russia’s Wrongful Detention of Journalist Evan Gershkovich	  Vedant PatelApril 10, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top
# Hungary

94 items

        -    Report  		Hungary	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  June 27, 2017 
        -    		Hungary (17-331)- Atomic Energy Arrangement for Nuclear Safety	  March 31, 2017 
        -    		International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEAs)	   
        -    Report  		Hungary	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Hungary (16-901) – Agreement on Social Security with Administrative Arrangement	  September 1, 2016 

previous page1…5678910next page

Back to Top
HomeItaly

# Italy

266 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Malta, Italy, the Vatican, and the United Kingdom	  October 27, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. Department of State at the World Federation of the Deaf 	  October 22, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Special Envoy Fowler’s Remarks at the 2023 World Food Forum in Rome	  Cary  FowlerOctober 18, 2023Food and Agriculture Organization of the UNRome, Italy 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Milan, Italy: American School of Milan: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez Travels to Berlin, Paris, Brussels, Rome, and London	  September 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Rome, the Vatican, Palermo, and Warsaw	  September 25, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The Minerals Security Partnership Continues to Expand with Norway, Italy, and India	  September 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Romania and Italy	  August 31, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Human Rights and Democracy  		Expanding the Global Equality Fund and Protecting Human Rights with New International Partners	  August 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 

previous page1…34567…27next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry MAJOR v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 67758.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Henry Major applying for remedial writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 1-12-75-723, Crim. Sect. I.

Denied.
HomeReleases: Clean EDGE Asia...Clean EDGE Asia Conference in Dhaka, Bangladesh

# 									Clean EDGE Asia Conference in Dhaka, Bangladesh							

Other Release

May 23, 2023

On 22-23 May 2023, ENR’s Energy and Mineral Governance Program (EMGP) hosted a Clean EDGE Asia regional workshop in Dhaka, Bangladesh to discuss regional cooperation in South Asia’s energy transition. The workshop convened 70 attendees, including Bangladeshi officials, U.S. and E.U. diplomats and stakeholders, academic experts, and international corporations and investors. Featured speakers included Ambassador Haas, Energy Advisor to the Prime Minister Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, Bangladeshi Foreign Secretary Momen, MP Waseqa Ayesha Khan, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs Secretary Chowdhury. Panel discussions covered land use challenges, local capacity, and human capital development to ensure a just and sustainable energy transition and opportunities for cooperation between South Asian countries to achieve climate and clean energy goals.

Tags

BangladeshBureau of Energy ResourcesEnergy

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 570.411 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked. ( a ) Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
( b ) This section, which deals with the consequences of ownership of entities, in no way limits the definition of the Government of Libya in § 570.305, which includes within its definition other persons whose property and interests in property are blocked but who are not on the SDN List.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00764

- CV

IN RE GMG HEALTH SYS TEMS ASSOCIATES, PA d/b/a Gonzaba Medical Group,
Relator

Original Mandamus Proceedings 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 22, 2010 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has

determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CI

- 04044 , styled Olga Zamora, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey Zamora v. GMG Health Systems Associates, PA d/b/a Gonzaba Medical Group , pending in the 408th Judicial District Court

, B exar County, Texas. The Honorable Larry Noll is the presiding judge of the 408th Judicial District Court ; however, the Honorable Michael Peden

, presiding judge of the
285th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, signed the order at issue in this pr oceeding.
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT


 


to the Share Purchase Agreement between



 


Daulton Capital Corp and the Shareholders
of Grimsby Investments Ltd


 


This AMENDMENT to the Share Purchase Agreement
between Daulton Corporation and the shareholders of Grimsby Investments Ltd. of May 12th , 2012, is written solely to
address two previous conditions between the parties, namely the Company's obligations under that agreement to tender preferred
shares and funds payable to the shareholders of Grimsby Investments Ltd.


 


Both parties to the original Agreement have
come together to address certain base readjustments to the original contract in order to maintain the business viability of the
contract between the parties.


 


§a of that Agreement called for $75,000,000
of the debt to be converted into preferred shares. This section and obligation is specifically waved and cancelled.


 


§b of
that Agreement called for $75,000,000 of the debt to be secured by a 10 year Promissory Note. This section and obligation is specifically
amended by the waiver and cancellation of obligation to pay $67,500,000 of the debt. The remaining
$7,500,000 of the debt remains, and shall be evidenced by 10 year Promissory Note in favor of Endx Pte Limited and TigerSprey Pte
Limited.


 


All other aspects of the original Share
Purchase Agreement are unchanged and this Amendment should have no effect upon any other clause other than the two addressed herein.


 


DATED: August 28th, 2012


 


/s/ Arun Pudur


Arun Pudur, Director, Daulton Corp.


 


/s/ Brian James Smith


Brian James Smith, Director, Daulton Corp.


 


/s/ Arun Pudur


Arun Pudur, Representative of Grimsby Shareholders


 


/s/ Arun Ramachandran


Arun Ramachandran, Director, Daulton Corp.
Order entered September 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00098-CV

RYAN GALLAGHER, Appellant

V.

COLLIN COUNTY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-00049-2020

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s September 8, 2020 motion for summary 

judgment and September 13, 2020 further motion for summary judgment. We 

DENY the motions.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# Exhibit 31.2

# CERTIFICATION

I, Cynthia B. Koenig, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of USHEALTH Group, Inc.
          (formerly, Ascent Assurance, Inc.);
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
          for, the periods presented in this report;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 19, 2005

| | /Cynthia B. Koenig/Cynthia B. KoenigSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2851

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for approval of enrollment

in courses offered at certain branches or extensions of proprietary profit

institutions of higher learning in operation for more than two years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1996

Mr. STUMP (for himself and Mr. BUYER) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Veterans Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for approval of enrollment in courses offered at certain

branches or extensions of proprietary profit institutions

of higher learning in operation for more than two years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3689 of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking out subsection (c); and

6 (2) in subsection (b)—

7 (A) by striking out ‘‘or’’ at the end of

8 paragraph (5);
2

•HR 2851 IH

1 (B) by striking out the period at the end

2 of paragraph (6) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘;

3 or’’; and

4 (C) by adding after paragraph (6) the fol5 lowing:

6 ‘‘(7) any course offered by a proprietary profit

7 institution of higher learning at a branch or exten8 sion of such institution if—

9 ‘‘(A) the course has been offered at the

10 principal location of such institution for more

11 than two years and is approved under this

12 chapter; and

13 ‘‘(B) the course has been offered by an14 other branch or extension of such institution

15 approved under this chapter which has been in

16 operation for more than two years.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Brian Bonar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: November 20, 2006

/s/ Brian Bonar
---------------
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer