alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                    AMENDMENT TO DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
         AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PLAN

Effective January 1, 2005, a new Section 10 is added to the above-referenced
Plan, to read as follows:

    10.  COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A

          It is intended that Deferred Shares granted prior to January 1,
    2005, to the extent that as of December 31, 2004, such Deferred Shares
    were vested, will satisfy the grandfather provisions applicable under
    Section 409A of the Code so that such Deferred Shares (together with
    any dividend equivalents thereon) will not be subject to Section 409A
    of the Code. No amendment to this Plan made after October 3, 2004 will
    apply to Deferred Shares granted prior to January 1, 2005 (or to
    dividend equivalents thereon) unless the amendment specifically
    provides that it applies to such Deferred Shares. It is intended that
    Deferred Shares granted on or after January 1, 2005 will comply with
    Section 409A of the Code and any regulations and guidelines issued
    thereunder, and the Plan will be interpreted in a manner consistent
    with such intent. Accordingly, the terms of any Deferred Shares granted
    after January 1, 2005 under the Plan, as set forth in an applicable
    Award agreement, may differ from the specific terms contemplated by the
    Plan in any manner that would not adversely affect the Company, to the
    extent necessary for the Deferred Shares so granted to comply with
    Section 409A of the Code.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. James M. BARCLAY, Respondent.

No. 60499.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 28, 1981.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Cynthia S. Prettyman, Asst. Branch Staff Counsel, Fort Lauder-dale, for complainant.

James M. Barclay, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on petition for approval of conditional guilty plea to consent judgment and entry of final order of discipline to violations of disciplinary rules prohibiting the charging of excessive fees, conduct which adversely reflects on a lawyer’s fitness to practice law, and conduct of a dishonest or immoral character.* We approve the petition, and we hereby reprimand respondent, James M. Barclay, for these violations. Publication of this order in *Southern Reporter*shall serve as respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $318.05 are hereby taxed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting Chief Justice, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

*

 The applicable provisions are Fla. Bar Code Prof. Resp. D.R. 1-102(A)(6), 2-106(A), (B)(1) and (4), and Fla. Bar Integr. Rule, art. XI, rule 11.02(3)(a).
#### § 570.316 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money services businesses, operators of credit card systems, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
# Switzerland

143 items

        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Switzerland	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Switzerland	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Switzerland	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Switzerland	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Switzerland (19-920) – Double Taxation Agreement	   
        -    Report  		Switzerland and Liechtenstein	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Switzerland	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Switzerland	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Switzerland	  April 25, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Switzerland (19-417) – Defense Research and Development Agreement	   

previous page1…101112131415next page

Back to Top
#### Roy V. CLARK, Appellant, v. Sam T. JOYCE, Sheriff, Appellee.

No. 74-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
----

|   | EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION1350 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY      /s/ Frank West                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Frank      West               |
|   | Title:  Chief      Executive Officer |
|   |  Date:  May      9, 2008        |

|   | of      this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to      Security Capital Corporation and willbe |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | retained      by Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | upon      request. |
|--------|--------------------|

----
APPENDIX – A: DJI Inspire 1 Technical Specifications

Envision will only utilizes safe and reliable UAS. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS production. DJI 

UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will not allow 

flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a 

predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition, 

DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to the PIC via the linked monitor 

(smart phone/tablet devices)

DJI Inspire 1 – Aircraft

Model T600

Weight (Battery Included) 6lbs 7.5291oz (2935g)

Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) Vertical: 0.5m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 3000/s; Yaw: 1500/s

Max Tilt Angle 350

Max Ascent Speed 5m/s

Max Descent Speed 4m/s

Max Speed 22m/s (ATTI mode, no wind - NOT RECOMMENDED)

Max Flight Altitude 4500m

Max Wind Resistance 10m/s

Max Flight Time Approximately 18 minutes

Motor Model DJI 3510

Propeller Model DJI 1345

Operating Temperature Range 140F to 1040F (-100C to 400C)

Dimensions 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12”

DJI Inspire 1 – Gimbal

Model ZENMUSE X3

Output Power (with camera) Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W

Operating Current Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA

Angular Vibration Range ±0.030

Mounting Detachable

Controllable Range Pitch: -900 to +300; Pan: ±3200

Mechanical Range Pitch: -1250 to 450; Pan: ±3300

Max Controllable Speed Pitch: 1200/s; Pan: 1800/s

DJI Inspire 1 – Camera

Name X3

Model FC350

Total Pixels 12.76M

Effective Pixels 12.4M

Image Max Size 4000x3000

ISO Range 100-3200

Field of View 940

CMOS Sony EXMOR 1/2.3”

HD Video Recording UHD(4K): 4096x2160p24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30

FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60
Operating Temperature Range 320F - 1040F (00C - 400C)

DJI Inspire 1 – Transmitter

Name C1

Operating Frequency 5.728-5.850GHz; 2.400-2.483GHz

Communicating Distance (unobstructed) 2000m

Output Power 9W

Operating Temperature Range 140F to 1040F (-100C to 400C)

Battery 600mAh LiPo 2S
# Denmark

		Subscribe		

108 items

        -    		Denmark	  April 23, 2019 
        -    		Marine Biodiversity	  March 18, 2019 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Enhanced Partnership in Northern Europe (E-PINE)	   
        -    Report  		Denmark	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…7891011next page

Back to Top
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |
|--------|--------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C., SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

|   | AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY  /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  Connie Woods Hawkins     |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |  Date:  November 9, 2011   |
Skip to main content 

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

## Utility (Top) navigation

-  About Us   **Forward **Back-  About Us
-  Mission & Vision
-  Leadership
-  Our Organization
-  Our Facilities
-  Regions

-  Laws & Regulations   **Forward **Back-  Laws & Regulations
-  Laws, Agreements & Treaties
-  Hunting Regulations

-  Library   **Forward **Back-  Library
-  Categories
-  Collections

                          -   Home 
                          -   Services   **Forward **Back-   Services 
-   Duck Stamps   **Forward **Back-   Duck Stamps 
-   Buy a Duck Stamp or E-Stamp 
-   Buy a Junior Duck Stamp 

-   Fish Stocking 
-   Importing & Exporting 
-   Consultation & Technical Assistance   **Forward **Back-   Consultation & Technical Assistance 
-   ESA Section 7 Consultation 
-   Habitat Conservation Planning (HCPs) 
-   Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCA & CCAA) 
-   Safe Harbour Agreements (SHA) 
-   Conservation Banking 
-   Coastal Barrier Resources Act Project Consultation 
-   Coastal Barrier Resources System Property Documentation 

-   Financial Assistance 
-   Species Management 
-   Investigational New Animal Drugs (INADS) 
-   Permits 
-   Search All Services 
Duck StampsOne of the easiest ways that anyone can support bird habitat conservation is by buying duck stamps.
                          -   Species   **Forward **Back-   Species 
-   Explore Taxonomic Tree 
-   Find a Species 
Interest storyBats: “The Coolest Mammals on Earth”
                          -   Visit Us   **Forward **Back-   Visit Us 
-   Events 
-   National Fish Hatcheries 
-   National Wildlife Refuges 
-   Outdoor Recreation 
-   Recreation Passes 
-   Our Locations 
Scenic DrivesTour routes of great scenic drives on National Wildlife Refuges.
                          -   Get Involved   **Forward **Back-   Get Involved 
-   Careers and Internships 
-   Volunteering 
-   Friends Partnerships 
-   Learning Opportunities 
-   Education Programs 
-   Events 
-   Partnerships   **Forward **Back-   Partnerships 
-   Partnership Categories 
-   Partner List 

VolunteerSearch for volunteer opportunities around the country
                          -   Newsroom   **Forward **Back-   Newsroom 
-   Press Releases 
-   Congressional Testimony 
-   Media Contacts 
Wild ThingsNews about wonderful wild things and places
                          -   Initiatives   **Forward **Back-   Initiatives 
-   Combating Wildlife Trafficking 
-   Director's Priorities 
-   Climate Change 
-   Fishing 
-   Invasive Species 
-   Pollinators 
-   Protecting Wildlife 
Climate ActionFWS is taking steps to mitigate climate impacts
                          -   I want to   **Forward **Back-  I Want To
-   Report Wildlife Crime 
-   Do Business with FWS 
-   Volunteer 
-   Find a Job or Internship 
-   Visit a Refuge 
-   Buy a Duck Stamp 
-   Apply for a Permit 
-   Find Funding 
-   Find Training 
Wild workSearch employment opportunities with USFWS

## Search

Search

# Savannah National Wildlife Refuge
#### Dallas Graham WICKERHAM; Jeanene Senarighi Wickerham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-15779.

D.C. No. CV-99-00242-LDG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Dallas Graham and Jeanene Senarighi Wickerham appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal, with prejudice, of their tax refund action against the United States for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim, *see Partnership Exch. Sec. v. NASD,*169 F.3d 606, 608 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order entered on March 8, 2000.

The Wickerhams’ assertion that the district court erred by not affording them an opportunity to amend their complaint is not persuasive. *See Reddy v. Litton Indus., Inc.,*912 F.2d 291, 296 (9th Cir.1990) (stating that dismissal with prejudice is not an abuse of discretion if amendment would be futile).

We have considered the Wickerhams’ remaining contentions, and they lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 1002.213 Appeals of exclusions.

Before imposing an exclusion under § 1002.210, the State agency must give the individual or entity the opportunity to submit documents and written argument against the exclusion. The individual or entity must also be given any additional appeals rights that would otherwise be available under procedures established by the State.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


                  IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,  a corporation organized and
existing  under  and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"),

                  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  FIRST:  That a  resolution  was duly  adopted  by the Board of
Directors  of  the  Corporation  setting  forth  a  proposed  amendment  to  the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, and declaring said amendment to
be  advisable  and  recommended   for  approval  by  the   stockholders  of  the
Corporation. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment was as follows:
RESOLVED,  that the  second  sentence  of Section  (1) of Article  FOURTH of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended to read in full
as follows:

"The number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is 10,000,  par
value $1,000.00 per share,  and the number of shares of Common Stock  authorized
to be issued is 100,000,000, par value $0.005 per share."

                  SECOND: That, thereafter, the stockholders of said Corporation
approved the amendment by written  consent in accordance with Section 228 of the
Delaware General  Corporation Law, and written notice has been given as provided
in such Section 228.

                  THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

<PAGE>


                  FOURTH:  That the  capital  of said  Corporation  shall not be
reduced under or by reason of said amendment.

                  IN  WITNESS   WHEREOF,   the   Corporation   has  caused  this
certificate  to be signed and attested to by Brian Bonar and Gerry B. Berg,  the
President and the Secretary of the Corporation,  respectively,  this 13th day of
January, 1999.

                                               BY:    /s/ Brian Bonar 
                                                          ----------------------
                                                          Brian Bonar, President

ATTEST:


     /s/ Gerry B. Berg  
---------------------------------                
         Gerry B. Berg, Secretary


                                       -2-
<PAGE>   1






                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Board of Directors
Phoenix Network, Inc.


We have issued our reports dated March 12, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the annual report of Phoenix
Network, Inc. on Form 10-K for the three years in the period ended December 31,
1996.  We hereby consent to the use of our name as it appears under the caption
"Selected Financial Data" and to the incorporation by reference of said reports
in the Registration Statements of Phoenix Network, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
33-35844 effective July 12, 1990), Form S-3, as amended (File No. 33-70672
effective February 25, 1994), and Form S-3, as amended (File No. 333-20923
effective February 12, 1997).




GRANT THORNTON LLP

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 12, 1997
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bryon Look, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the ended annual Report of LSI Logic Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10- K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSI Logic Corporation.  

|   | By:    | /s/  BRYON LOOK                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                              |
|   | Name:  | **Bryon Look**                                               |
|   | Title: | **Executive Vice President &   Chief Financial Officer** |
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3047

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individual retirement

accounts and certain individually-directed accounts to acquire gold, silver,

platinum, or palladium bullion without treating the acquisition as a

distribution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1996

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mrs. VUCANOVICH) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

individual retirement accounts and certain individuallydirected accounts to acquire gold, silver, platinum, or

palladium bullion without treating the acquisition as a

distribution.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BULLION NOT TREATED AS COLLECTIBLES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 408(m)

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

6 as follows:
2

•HR 3047 IH

1 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION FOR BULLION.—For purposes

2 of this subsection, the term ‘collectible’ shall not in3 clude any gold, silver, platinum, or palladium bullion

4 (whether fabricated in the form of a coin or other5 wise) of a fineness equal to or exceeding the mini6 mum fineness required for metals which may be de7 livered in satisfaction of a regulated futures contract

8 subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures

9 Trading Commission under the Commodity Ex10 change Act, if such coin or bullion is in the physical

11 possession of a trustee described under subsection

12 (a) of this section.’’

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

15 December 31, 1995.

Æ