# OAR Box 1875

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 44 ) ll-E-6 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:46

AM Sheet 44 of 86 P. 1\ P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-E-6 2 SUMMAR Y O F MEETIN

G
Date : Septembe r 22 , 199 2

•••:£\ < _S> " "AA

Subject : Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Issue s o n th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) Attendees : William Rosenberg , Assistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an d Radiatio n EPA ^ To m

Kiernan , Deput yAssistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an d Radiation , EPA Lydi a Wegman , Deput yDirecto r o f th e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standards , EPA Bruc e Jordan , Directo r o f th e Emission s Standard s Division , EPA Richar d Sigman , Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Te d Cromwell , Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Kath yBailey , Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Annett e Stanley , Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Jo e Hovias , Unio n Carbid e Bria n Taranto , Exxo n Chemica l >S Chuc k Malloch , Monsant o

Joh n Dege , DuPon t CM Arequeste d thi s meetin g t o discus s 4 issue s abou t th e HON . Th e issue s are : (1 ) Ho w ca n biotreatmen t unit s b e use d t o compl y wit h th e wastewate r provision s i n th e HON? ; (2 ) Ca n system s tha t d o no t recor d dat a unles s ther e i s a n excursio n beyond a pre-se t rang e o f value s b e use d t o compl ywit h th e monitorin g provision s o f th e HON? ; (3 ) Ho w shoul d paramete r monitorin g o f contro l device s b e use d t o determin e complianc e wit h th e HON? ; an d (4 ) Ho w shoul d th e quarterl ychec k o n emissions , fo r emission s averaging , b e structured ? CM

Aprovide d a handou t t o explai n thei r positio n o n th e thir d issu e liste d above . Thi s handou t i s attached . EP Alistene d t o CMA' s explanatio n o f thes e 4 issue s an d committe d t o hav e staf f wor k wit h CM Aove r th e nex t wee k i n a n attemp t t o resolv e thei r concerns . Bot h group s agree d t o mee t on e wee k late r t o follow-u p o n thes e discussions
. 1 Attachmen tP. 3

CM A PROPOSA

L REGARDING HO

N COMPLIANCE , OPERATING PARAMETER S AN D DEFINITION I

N PERMI T - 9/21/9 2

•

•

• Rul e t o stat e tha t complianc e i s generally define da s the installatio n andprope r operation o f referenc e contro l technolog y (o r equivalent

) Operating parameter s indicatin g performanc e wouldcontinu e to b e liste din rul e (e.g., , 50°F fro mlas t performanc e tes t

fo r incinerators)
. Source s coul destablis h alternat e parameter s i

n permittin g proces s basedo n performanc e tests , engineerin g calculations , manufacturers recommendations , or othe r method s acceptabl e to th e permittin g agency . Parameters wouldb e include din permit s wit h the requiremen

t tha t deviation s from parameter s woul dresul t

i n correctiv e action b e initiate dwithin 2 4 hour s t o ensur e the contro l devic e operate s properly
. Source s wouldkee p alo g o f correctiv e actions
. Correctiv e measure s coul dinclude modifiedoperations , improve doperations/maintenanc e practices , establishin g ne

w parameters , o

r performing anew performanc e tes t

• Preamble wouldstate tha t deviatio n fro

moperating parameter s doe s no t necessarily mea

n noncomplianc e

o:\home\ajchd

v 1 \0918__ n