alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.517 Authorizing Certain Transactions in Support of Nongovernmental Organizations' Activities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the activities described in paragraph (b) of this section by a nongovernmental organization are authorized, provided that the nongovernmental organization is not a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part.
( b ) The activities referenced in paragraph (a) of this section are non-commercial activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population that fall into one of the following categories: ( 1 ) Activities to support humanitarian projects to meet basic human needs, including disaster, drought, or flood relief; food, nutrition, or medicine distribution; the provision of health services; assistance for vulnerable or displaced populations, including individuals with disabilities and the elderly; and environmental programs;
( 2 ) Activities to support democracy building, including activities to support rule of law, citizen participation, government accountability and transparency, human rights and fundamental freedoms, access to information, and civil society development projects;
( 3 ) Activities to support education, including combating illiteracy, increasing access to education, international exchanges, and assisting education reform projects;
( 4 ) Activities to support non-commercial development projects directly benefiting civilians, including those related to health, food security, and water and sanitation;
( 5 ) Activities to support environmental and natural resource protection, including the preservation and protection of threatened or endangered species, responsible and transparent management of natural resources, and the remediation of pollution or other environmental damage; and
( 6 ) Activities to support disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and conflict resolution programs.
( c ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
( d ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize nongovernmental or other entities to engage in other activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population, including support for the removal of landmines and economic development projects directly benefiting the civilian population.
Note 1 to § 570.517 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78496, Dec. 21, 2022]
# Australia

267 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Australia’s Minister for Defense Industry, Minister for International Development and the Pacific Conroy	  April 10, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Australian and New Zealand Counterparts	  April 3, 2024 
        -    Joint Statement  		United States-Australia Sixth Energy Security Dialogue	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Bonnie Denise Jenkins, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsMarch 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Finkenauer’s Travel to Australia and Thailand	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Canada	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Australia	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Australia and New Zealand	  February 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		2024 U.S.-Australia Strategic Policy Dialogue	  February 28, 2024 

123…27next page

Back to Top
HomeEgypt

# Egypt

274 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Egyptian President El-Sisi	  January 11, 2024 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Blinken’s Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 11, 2024Cairo, Egypt 
        -    		Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt, January 4-11, 2024	   
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt	  Matthew MillerJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Minister Shoukry of Egypt	  December 19, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting on Gaza with Joint Arab League-Organization of Islamic Cooperation Delegation	  December 9, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Egypt	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Israel and Gaza 	  November 28, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Minister Shoukry of Egypt	  November 26, 2023 

previous page123456…28next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: November 10, 2005


/S/ Brian Bonar
------------------------------------
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       27
§ 594.516 Transactions with the Palestinian Authority authorized. ( a ) As of June 20, 2007, U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions otherwise prohibited under this part with the Palestinian Authority.
( b ) For purposes of this section only, the term *Palestinian Authority* means the Palestinian Authority government of Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and President Mahmoud Abbas, including all branches, ministries, offices, and agencies (independent or otherwise) thereof.
[72 FR 61518, Oct. 31, 2007]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6726

CLARENCE BILLUPS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus J. P. LOFTON, Correctional Officer of Department of Corrections, Supervisor of Paint Crew; KENT GRANT, Safety Officer, Department of Corrections; EARL BARKSDALE, Chief of Security; LIEUTENANT THOMAS, Watch Commander, Department of Corrections; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-420-AM) Submitted: October 3, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Billups, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Billups appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We review dismissals under § 1915A de novo. See Veney v. Wyche , 293 F.3d 726, 730 (4th Cir. 2002). The district court dismissed Billups’s § 1983 complaint as frivolous because it had previously dismissed a claim filed by him based on the same issues and brought against the same defendants. See Billups v. Lofton , 03-CV-71 (E.D. Va. Feb 3, 2003). Billups did not appeal the disposition of this earlier dismissal. We find that Billups’s § 1983 claim is barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions in Virginia. See Harvey v. Horan , 278 F.3d 370, 384 (4th Cir. 2002); see alsoV A . C ODE ANN . § 8.01-243. Moreover, his claims of negligence on the part of the defendants do not support recovery under § 1983. See Baynard v. Malone , 268 F.3d 228, 236 (4th Cir. 2001); see alsoGrayson v. Peed , 195 F.3d 692, 695 (4th Cir. 1999). Thus, we find that the district court’s dismissal under § 1915A(b)(1) was proper, and we affirm the district court’s order on the modified grounds noted herein. We also deny Billups’s motions for oral argument and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1004.130 Reinstatement after exclusion. ( a ) A practitioner or other person who has been excluded in accordance with this part may apply for reinstatement at the end of the period of exclusion. The OIG will consider any request for reinstatement in accordance with provisions of §§ 1001.3001 through 1001.3005 of this chapter.
( b ) The OIG may also consider a practitioner's or other person's compliance with the certification obligation in § 1004.110(d) at the time of reinstatement.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00405-CR

IN RE DEMARCUS DONTRELL RIDGE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Demarcus D. Ridge’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed with this Court on 

November 29, 2016. There are numerous procedural deficiencies with the petition, 

including but not limited to an inadequate record and the failure to serve the trial court 

as the respondent or the State of Texas as the real party in interest. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7; 

52.2; 9.5(a). However, to expedite a decision in this proceeding, we use Rule 2 to suspend 

the rules and overlook these and other deficiencies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Ridge contends that on October 17, 2016, he filed a motion with the 54th District 

Court requesting an order to the clerk of the court to make available grand jury testimony 

in a particular case or explain why there is no such testimony in the court’s file. Ridge 
In re Ridge Page 2

further contends that in response, the court sent Ridge a list of what was contained in the 

reporter’s record which did not include grand jury testimony. Ridge did not include a 

record with his petition which would contain a file stamped copy of his motion and any 

response by the court.

The need to consider and rule on a properly filed and presented document is not 

a discretionary act but a ministerial one, and a trial court is allowed a reasonable time 

within which to perform that act. In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228-229 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). However, without a record sufficient to show a 

violation of this duty, we cannot issue a mandamus against the trial court. See In re 

Wallace, No. 10-15-00065-CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2682, *2 (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 19, 

2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 

It also appears that Ridge wants the trial court and this Court to grant his motion. 

An appellate court can only compel a trial court to rule on a pending motion by a writ of 

mandamus; it cannot compel the trial court to rule in a certain way. State ex rel. Young v. 

Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2007); State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); In re Birdwell, 

393 S.W.3d 886, 892 (Tex. App.—Waco 2012, orig. proceeding). Further, in a mandamus 

proceeding alleging the trial court's failure to rule, we do not render the order or 

judgment the trial court should have rendered as we do in an appeal. In re Birdwell, 393 

S.W.3d at 892.
In re Ridge Page 3

Accordingly, for the reasons discussed, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Pet. denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 7, 2016

Do not publish

[OT06]
Home2013 Treaties and Agreements...Brazil (13-319.1) – Agreement Exchange of Information Relating to Taxes

# 									Brazil (13-319.1) – Agreement Exchange of Information Relating to Taxes							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

March 19, 2013

Taxation: Information Exchange

Agreement signed at Brasilia March 20, 2007; entered into force March 19, 2013.
Download attachment						 [648 KB]

Tags

BrazilTaxationTreaties

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2811 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2811

     To designate the nature preserve located at the Naval Weapons 
 Industrial Reserve Plant in Calverton, New York, and administered by 
      the Department of the Navy as the ``Otis G. Pike Preserve''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 1995

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To designate the nature preserve located at the Naval Weapons 
 Industrial Reserve Plant in Calverton, New York, and administered by 
      the Department of the Navy as the ``Otis G. Pike Preserve''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CALVERTON PINE BARRENS AS OTIS G. PIKE 
              PRESERVE.

    Section 2854(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484; 106 Stat. 2626), as added by 
section 2823(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 3058), is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The Calverton Pine 
Barrens is hereby designated as the `Otis G. Pike Preserve'.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 578.303 Cyber-enabled activities.

The term *cyber-enabled activities* includes any act that is primarily accomplished through or facilitated by computers or other electronic devices.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation
(the  "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,  Thu
A. Dang, Vice President,  Finance of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based upon my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                    /s/ Thu A. Dang
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated:   August 9, 2006             Thu A. Dang, Vice President, Finance
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2907

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel BAREFOOT’N.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 30, 1996

Mr. PICKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

BAREFOOT’N.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 2907 IH

1 trade for the vessel BAREFOOT’N (United States official

2 number 619766).

Æ
A` 

# 4# jujm

STATE OFLOUISIANA VERSUS MITCHELL PAUL COOK 

### NO. 

### 2023 KW 0836 

### OCTOBER23, 2023

In Re: Mitchell Paul Cook, 

### applying 

### for supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of 

### St. 

## Tammany, Nos. 

### 1880-M-2021, 1879-F-2021.
BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, ANDWOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED 

### for the sole purpose 

## of transferring the writ application, which 

### includes the 

### pleading, to the 

### district court 

### for enforcement of 

### its June 7, 

### 2023 order 

### in which 

### it granted relator' s " Motion 

### for Transcripts," 

### if it has not 

### done so 

### already. JEW GH EW
§ 1001.2005 Notice to State licensing agencies. ( a ) HHS will promptly notify the appropriate State(s) or local agencies or authorities having responsibility for the licensing or certification of an individual or entity excluded (or directed to be excluded) from participation of the facts and circumstances of the exclusion.
( b ) HHS will request that appropriate investigations be made and sanctions invoked in accordance with applicable State law and policy, and will request that the State or local agency or authority keep the Secretary and the OIG fully and currently informed with respect to any actions taken in response to the request.
# Brunei

59 items

        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Brunei	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Brunei	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Brunei	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  July 19, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Brunei (18-718) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Military Information	  July 18, 2018 
        -    Report  		Brunei	  June 28, 2018 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
# Guinea

68 items

        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Guinea 	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Guinea	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Guinea	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint 10-Year Plans for the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability	  March 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Pursuing Peace Through Partnerships, Local Engagement, and Learning	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 25, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Guinea	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Combating Global Corruption and Human Rights Abuses	  December 9, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Guinea National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 2, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support of ECOWAS Sanctions on Guinea	  Ned PriceSeptember 27, 2022 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellant, v. Paul F. HARTSFIELD, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida, Appellee.

No. WW-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 1981.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1981.

*1020Joseph R. Boyd and W. Crit Smith of Boyd, Harris, & Smith, Tallahassee, and Chriss Walker of the Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellant.

F. Phillip Blank of Tucker & Blank, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) petitioned for mandamus in the circuit court to compel the clerk of the circuit court to provide to HRS without charge “all necessary services ... including the issuance of photographic copies of necessary court records, relating to civil actions” in child support and paternity proceedings under Chapter 409, Florida Statutes (1979). The circuit court denied the petition for writ of mandamus and this appeal followed. We affirm.

Section 409.2571(1), Florida Statutes (1979) provides that HRS or its agents “shall be entitled to the *necessary services*of the clerk ... in any proceeding under this act; ... and no fees for such court, clerk or sheriff’s services shall be charged against the department.” (e. s.)

This statute requires the clerk to provide all “necessary services” to HRS without charge. .From the record, we are unable to determine exactly what services the clerk is declining to provide. The petition speaks of “necessary court records” and “photographic copies” but appellant never explains exactly what court records are necessary and under what circumstances they are necessary. We are, therefore, not in a position to determine whether or not “necessary services” are being refused by the clerk.

In order to show entitlement to the extraordinary writ of mandamus, the petitioner must demonstrate a clear legal right on his part, an indisputable legal duty on the part of respondents, and that no other adequate remedy exists. *State ex rel Eichenbaum v. Cochran,*114 So.2d 797 (Fla.1959). *State ex rel. Blatt v. Panelfab International Corp.,*314 So.2d 196 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Mandamus is available to enforce an established legal right but not to establish that right. *Slaughter v. State ex rel. Harrell,*245 So.2d 126 (Fla.1st DCA 1971). *State v. Gamble,*339 So.2d 694 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

While we do not necessarily agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the clerk’s duties are divisible into those performed as clerk of the circuit court and those performed as county recorder, we need not consider that determination as we conclude that appellant has failed to show a clear entitlement to a writ of mandamus.

Accordingly the judgment below is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., LARRY G. SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.