alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte Tommy HICKS, et al. (Re Tommy HICKS, et al. v. Belle HUGGINS, et al.)

80-882.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 30, 1981.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and ALMON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
#### § 558.303 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
HomeForeign Press Centers...Foreign Press Centers  Releases

# Foreign Press Centers Releases

280 items

        -    FPC Briefing  		Transnational Repression Against Journalists	  December 13, 2023Wednesday, December 13, 2023, 1:00pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		An Overview of the U.S. Courts System	  December 13, 2023Wednesday, December 13, 2023, 11:00am ETNew York City 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Catalyzing Innovation in Technology through Regional Tech Hubs	  December 11, 2023Monday, December 11, 2023, 2:00pm ETNew York City 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Update on Hostage Situation and Humanitarian Aid in Gaza	  December 6, 2023Wednesday, December 6, 2023, 10:00am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Road to COP 28: U.S. Energy Policy with Deputy Secretary David Turk	  November 30, 2023Thursday, November 30, 2023, 10:15am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Reporting Tour  		Naval Station Norfolk and NATO’s Home in North America	  November 29, 2023November 29-30, 2023Norfolk, Virginia 
        -    FPC Briefing  		2023 Update on U.S. Visa Processing Worldwide	  Julie StufftNovember 28, 2023Tueday, November 28, 2023, 1:00pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		U.S. Government Response to Migration in the Americas	  November 17, 2023Friday, November 17, 2023, 4:30pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Review of the Current U.S. Global Energy Policy Priorities	  Geoffrey R. PyattNovember 16, 2023Thursday, November 16, 2023, 11:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Road to COP 28: The Role of the Ocean in Combatting Climate Change	  November 15, 2023Wednesday, November 15, 2023, 10:00am ETWashington, D.C. 

previous page1…34567…28next page

Back to Top
#### John Robert HANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
40449.

#### ALBERTSON v. WILLIAMS et al.

Ebbrhabdt, Judge.

There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error because certain facts alleged in Albertson’s various post trial motions were not approved by the trial judge as true in the bill of exceptions and on the ground that plaintiff in error • “then and there accepted and now accepts” to the court’s rulings. Under the view we take of the case below, it is irrelevant whether or not the facts alleged were true. Use of the word “accepts” in this context is not ground for dismissal of the writ. *McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Cory.,*107 Ga. App. 807 (1) (131 SE2d 640). The motion is denied.

(a) We view *Perry v. Maryland Cas. Co.,*102 Ga. App. 475 (2a) (116 SE2d 620) as controlling here on the question of procedure. There it was held that a, case should not go to trial, even in the absence of the defendant, without a ruling on demurrers unless the demurrers were not meritorious. See also *Morgan v. Western Auto Co.,*102 Ga. App. 648, 652 (4) (117 SE2d 253) and citations. There is an intimation that the court did rule orally on the demurrers but no order appears of record. Unless an order appears on the demurrers, whether entered originally or nunc pro tunc, it must be assumed that none has been entered. *Rutherford v. Crawford, 53*Ga. 138*(3); Armstrong v. Lewis,*61 Ga. 680. Therefore, the controlling question here is whether or not any of the defendant’s demurrers were meritorious.

(b) Distilled to its essence, the petition alleges a violation of the Bulk Sales Act1*(Code*§ 28-203 et seq.) in which this defendant was the vendee. The recovery is then sought on *628an open account. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Bulk Sales Act is penalized by a failure of the sale to pass title to the vendee. Therefore, the creditor has any remedy he might have had against the vendor or against the goods. Under this theory, the remedies of attachment, *Carstarphen Warehouse Co. v. Fried,*124 Ga. 544 (52 SE 598), garnishment, *Haralson v. Mendel,*36 Ga. App. 174 (136 SE 88), and levy on the goods after judgment against the vendor, Cf. *Feagan v. Cureton,*19 Ga. 404, are allowed. However, no contract action on open account against the purchaser could be maintained on this basis. Therefore, it would appear that at least one demurrer raising this point was meritorious and should have been passed on before trial. The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.

Decided November 7, 1963.

*J. Clifford Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Noland & Williams, Robert J. Noland,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*

1

The Bulk Sales Act *(Code*§§ 28-203 to 28-206) is repealed by the Uniform Commercial Code and *Code Ann. Ch.*109A-6 substituted therefor. Ga. L. 1962, p. 427, effective January 1, 1964.
§ 570.302 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to the Government of Libya or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201(a)(1) or (2), 8:00 p.m. eastern standard time, February 25, 2011; and
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 570.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, c*onstructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
§ 589.326 New investment. The term *new investment* as used in § 589.206 means a transaction on or after 3:30 p.m. eastern standard time, December 19, 2014 that constitutes: ( a ) A commitment or contribution of funds or other assets; or
( b ) A loan or other extension of credit as defined in § 589.324.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRANT'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                     OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a)


I, Peter J. Murphy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Parlex
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

      a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

      b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 17, 2003                /s/ Peter J. Murphy
                                       -----------------------
                                       Peter J. Murphy
                                       President & Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Air Products Internal Use Only

POLYCAT SA8 PMN_Attachment #4 - Site Controlled by Other_Sanitized
Exhibit 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, William C.
Marsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the consolidated financial condition and result of
          operations of the Corporation.



/s/  William C. Marsh
---------------------

William C. Marsh
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

May 10, 2007
#### McGraw Hill Publishing Company, Incorporated, complainant, *v.*Sloan & Chace, Incorporated, defendant.

[Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Messrs. Palmer &*Powell, for the appellant.

*Messrs. Meisterman &*Kitchen, for the respondent.

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons-stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in *104 N. J. Eq. 120.*

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Tbenchaed, Paekee, Kalisci-i, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae,. JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
#### § 552.310 Property; property interest.

The terms *property* and *property interest* include money, checks, drafts, bullion, bank deposits, savings accounts, debts, indebtedness, obligations, notes, guarantees, debentures, stocks, bonds, coupons, any other financial instruments, bankers acceptances, mortgages, pledges, liens or other rights in the nature of security, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, trust receipts, bills of sale, any other evidences of title, ownership, or indebtedness, letters of credit and any documents relating to any rights or obligations thereunder, powers of attorney, goods, wares, merchandise, chattels, stocks on hand, ships, goods on ships, real estate mortgages, deeds of trust, vendors' sales agreements, land contracts, leaseholds, ground rents, real estate and any other interest therein, options, negotiable instruments, trade acceptances, royalties, book accounts, accounts payable, judgments, patents, trademarks or copyrights, insurance policies, safe deposit boxes and their contents, annuities, pooling agreements, services of any nature whatsoever, contracts of any nature whatsoever, and any other property, real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible, or interest or interests therein, present, future, or contingent.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 539]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ539.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2570]]

Public Law 106-539
106th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
      Making further continuing <<NOTE: Dec. 7, 2000 -  [H.J. Res. 
 127]>> appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, 
is <<NOTE: Ante, p. 2562.>> further amended by striking the date 
specified in section 106(c) and inserting ``December 8, 2000''.

    Approved December 7, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 127:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Dec. 7, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Frank OSTERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1091/NT 4-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 29, 1979.

*587Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, and Michael Salnick, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary E. Marsden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence on the charge of escape. Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and the judgment and sentence is affirmed except that the words, “hard labor,” are stricken therefrom.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

CROSS, C. J., and LETTS, GAVIN K., and BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judges, concur.
#### § 560.549 Policy governing Iranian news organizations' offices in the United States.

Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis authorizing transactions necessary for the establishment and operation of news bureaus in the United States by Iranian organizations whose primary purpose is the gathering and dissemination of news to the general public.
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merisel, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald R. Uzzi, as Chief
Executive Officer and Jon H. Peterson as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Donald R. Uzzi


--------------------------------------


Donald R.
Uzzi


Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, and President





/s/ Jon
H. Peterson


--------------------------------------


Jon H.
Peterson


Chief
Financial Officer





August
13, 2008





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the accompanying report.  A signed original copy
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Diario Oficial C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0928
  doi:10.3000/19770928.C_2012.040.spa |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 40 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 55o año11 de febrero de 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0928

doi:10.3000/19770928.C_2012.040.spa

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 40

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

55o año11 de febrero de 2012

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Parlamento Europeo |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Decisión | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

2012/C 040/01

Decisión

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

| 11.2.2012 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 40/1

---

DECISIÓN

2012/C 40/01

EL SECRETARIO GENERAL DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO,

Vistos el Estatuto de los funcionarios de la Unión Europea y el Régimen aplicable a otros agentes de la Unión Europea establecidos por el Reglamento (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 259/68 del Consejo y modificados en último lugar por el Reglamento (CE, Euratom) no 723/2004 del Consejo y, en particular, el artículo 30 de dicho Estatuto,

Vista la decisión de la Mesa relativa a la designación de la Autoridad facultada para proceder a los nombramientos, modificada en último lugar el 26 de octubre de 2004,

Vistas las convocatorias de concursos y de contratación:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S,

Visto el dictamen de la Comisión paritaria emitido en su reunión del 26 de octubre de 2011,

DECIDE:

Artículo único

La duración de la validez de las listas de reserva de los concursos y contrataciones:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S;

se prorroga hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2012.

Hecho en Luxemburgo, el 18 de diciembre de 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Secretario General

---
§ 525.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
# Armenia

244 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 7, 2023	  Vedant PatelNovember 7, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Yerevan, Armenia: QSI International School of Yerevan: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 1, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 26, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 26, 2023WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 23, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 10, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 10, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 4, 2023	  Vedant PatelOctober 4, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 3, 2023	  Vedant PatelOctober 3, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 2, 2023	  Matthew MillerOctober 2, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 28, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 28, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 27, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 27, 2023 

previous page1…34567…25next page

Back to Top
40716.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. WHIDDON.

Eberhardt, Judge.

In this condemnation case, there was a taking of 0.708 acres of condemnee’s 65-acre tract. The jury returned a verdict for $1,050. Condemnor moved for a new trial. The motion was overruled and exception taken. The grounds of the motion argued here are that the verdict was without evidence to support it and that the verdict was so excessive as to show bias and prejudice on the part of the jury. *Held:*

There was sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict. The condemnee testified that the actual value of the land taken was $1,000 and that the consequential damages to the remaining 64 acres was $20 per acre. Even if the former figure is not considered because condemnee placed a higher *745per acre valuation on the land taken than on the land remaining, the verdict would be authorized by the consequential damage evidence alone. The fact that one of the reasons given by the condemnee for his opinion testimony on consequential damages was that the property would be further from town because of the interstate highway does not render his opinion invalid under the rule of *Tift County v. Smith,*219 Ga. 68 (131 SE2d 527). A witness may give his opinion as to market value even though his opinion is shown to be based in part on evidence that would be inadmissible in its own right. See *Sutton v. State Hwy. Dept.,*103 Ga. App. 29 (4) (118 SE2d 285) where it was held that unaccepted offers to buy, while not admissible alone to prove value, could be the partial basis of opinion testimony as to value. Therefore the verdict was within the range of the testimony and does not show bias and prejudice.

Decided May 18, 1964.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, Paul Miller, E. J. Summerour, Assistant Attorneys General, J. Lundie Smith, Asa D. Kelly, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, S. B. McCall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hugh D. Wright, Edward Parrish,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
§ 553.405 Provision and receipt of services. ( a ) The prohibitions contained in § 553.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 553.201; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 553.201.
( b ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 553.201 apply to services received in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, where the service is performed by, or at the direction of, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 553.201.
( c ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 553.201, or negotiate with or enter into contracts signed by a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 553.201.
Note 1 to § 553.405 .
*See* §§ 553.507 and 553.509 for general licenses authorizing the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.