Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 72561 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3367; Special 

Conditions No. 25–596–SC] 

Special Conditions: Flight Structures, 

Inc., Boeing Model 777–200 Dynamic 

Test Requirements for SingleOccupant, Oblique (Side-Facing) Seats 

With Airbag Devices 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects an 

error that appeared in Docket No. FAA– 

2015–3367, Special Conditions No. 25– 

596–SC, which was published in the 

Federal Register on September 30, 2015 

(80 FR 58597). The error is in a 

reference to Boeing in a note preceding 

a section titled, Inflatable Lap Belt 

Special Conditions. It is being corrected 

herein. 

DATES: The effective date of this 

correction is November 20, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Shelden, FAA, Airframe and Cabin 

Safety Branch, ANM–115, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–2785; facsimile 

425–227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

document designated as ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2015–3367, Special Conditions 

No. 25–596–SC’’ was published in the 

Federal Register on September 30, 2015 

(80 FR 58597). The document issued 

special conditions pertaining to 

dynamic test requirements for singleoccupant, oblique (side-facing) seats 

with airbag devices on Boeing Model 

777–200 airplanes. 

As published, the document 

contained one error in a note that refers 

to Boeing rather than Flight Structures, 

Inc. 

Because no other part of the 

regulatory information has been 

changed, the Special Conditions are not 

being re-published. 

Correction 

In the Final Special Conditions, 

Request for Comments document [FR 

Doc. 2015–24727 filed 9–29–15; 8:45 

a.m.] published on September 30, 2015 

(80 FR 58597), make the following 

correction: 

On page 58599, column 3, the 

paragraph marked ‘‘Note:’’ should read: 

Note: Flight Structures, Inc., must 

demonstrate that the installation of seats via 

plinths or pallets meets all applicable 

requirements. Compliance with the guidance 

contained in FAA Policy Memorandum PS– 

ANM–100–2000–00123, dated February 2, 

2000, titled ‘‘Guidance for Demonstrating 

Compliance with Seat Dynamic Testing for 

Plinths and Pallets,’’ is acceptable to the 

FAA. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 11, 2015. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–29624 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Parts 33 and 35 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–4220; Special 

Conditions No. 33–017–SC] 

Special Conditions: CFM International, 

LEAP–1B Engine Models; 

Incorporation of Woven Composite 

Fan Blades 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the CFM International (CFM), 

LEAP–1B engine models. This engine 

model will have a novel or unusual 

design feature associated with the 

engine: woven composite fan blades. 

The applicable airworthiness 

regulations do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for this 

design feature. These special conditions 

contain the additional safety standards 

that the Administrator considers 

necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by the 

existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

special conditions is December 21, 

2015. 

We must receive your comments by 

December 7, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number FAA–2015–4220 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, 

DC, 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except federal holidays. 

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: The FAA will post all 

comments it receives, without change, 

to http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information the 

commenter provides. Using the search 

function of the docket Web site, anyone 

can find and read the electronic form of 

all comments received into any FAA 

docket, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement can be 

found in the Federal Register published 

on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478), 

as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Strom, Federal Aviation 

Administration Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service, ANE–112, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, 

Massachusetts, 01803–5213; telephone 

(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199; 

email alan.strom@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comment History 

The FAA has determined, in 

accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) 

and 553(d)(3), that notice and 

opportunity for prior public comment 

heron are unnecessary because the 

substance of these special conditions 

was subject to the public comment 

process in a prior instance, with no 

substantive comments received. The 

FAA therefore finds that good cause 

exists for making these special 

conditions effective upon issuance. 

Special condition No. Company/Airplane 

model 

33–14–02–SC ........... CFM/LEAP–1A 

CFM/LEAP–1C 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES