alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20782]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee J--Population and Patient-Oriented Training.
    Date: October 28, 2009.
    Time: 7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA.
    Contact Person: Ilda M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20782 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Counselor Chollet’s Trip to Poland

# 									Counselor Chollet’s Trip to Poland							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 23, 2021

Counselor of the Department Derek Chollet traveled to Warsaw to reaffirm the strong relationship the United States has with our NATO Ally Poland.  He met with Deputy Foreign Minister Marcin Przydacz, Secretary of State for Strategic Energy Infrastructure Piotr Naimski, and Marshal of the Senate, Senator Tomasz Grodzki to advocate a cooperative approach to enhancing Polish and regional energy security as well as addressing the climate crisis. He also expressed appreciation for Poland’s role in countering Russian aggression and promoting democracy in Belarus. Counselor Chollet raised the importance of further strengthening Poland’s democratic institutions and protecting media freedoms as core elements of a vibrant democracy. Finally, he discussed shared concerns about the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

While there, Counselor Chollet also met with business leaders to strengthen bilateral economic ties and civil society representatives to discuss our mutual commitment to democratic values.

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCounselor of the DepartmentEnergyOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPoland

Back to Top
#### Schmohl’s Administratrix v. Lincoln Council

*J. Boyd Landis,*for plaintiff.

*JohnD. Fatter, Jr.,*for Charles T. Schmohl.

*William F. Martson,*for defendant.

March 22, 1954.

Shughart, P. J.,

Marian James, administratrix of the estate of Anna T. Schmohl, instituted the above action in assumpsit against defendant, Lincoln Council No. 117 of the Sons and Daughters of Liberty, to recover a funeral benefit, in the amount of $200, due on account of the death of Anna T. Schmohl. Defendant interpleaded Charles Schmohl, husband of decedent, who also claimed the funeral benefit. Subsequently, by leave of court, defendant paid the sum into court and was discharged from further liability.

Thereafter, pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 16,1836, P. L. 715, as amended, 5 PS §30 et seq., and appropriate local rules of court, arbitrators were appointed to hear the controversy between the two claimants to the fund paid into court. On January 20, 1954, the arbitrators awarded the balance of the fund, after payment of costs, to the administratrix of the estate.

. On. February 11, 1954, counsel for Charles Schmohl filed a prascipe with the prothonotary, directing him to *358issue a rule to show cause why the award of the arbitrators should not be vacated and set aside. Issuance of the rule was waived and service of the copy accepted by counsel for the administratrix. The matter has been argued before the court en banc and is now ripe for decision.

Counsel has filed no written reason in support of the rule to vacate and set aside the award, nor has any written brief been filed with the court. Counsel stated at oral argument that the award of the arbitrators could not stand because, under the bylaws of defendant association set forth in the complaint of the administratrix, payment of the fund to her was not authorized.

In short, counsel contends that the arbitrators erred in their interpretation of the bylaws and, in effect, asks that judgment now be entered notwithstanding their award. No authority for the procedure employed has been cited nor has our own research revealed any. Section 4 of the Arbitration Act, supra (5 PS §71), provides for an appeal from the award of the arbitrators. Appeal practice in this court is further regulated by local rules of court 39, 40, 41.

The relief sought here was available to Charles Schmohl on appeal from the award. That is the only procedure provided by the statute for the correction of errors such as here alleged, and it must be followed.

The local rules provide for an appeal within 20 days after the award. The filing of the praecipe not only came too late to be considered as an appeal, but there has been a failure to comply with other prerequisites for an appeal relative to payment of costs. The filing of the praecipe, therefore, cannot be considered as an appeal.

And now, March 22, 1954, at 11 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time), the rule to show cause why the award of the arbitrators should not be stricken is vacated, be and is hereby discharged.
HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Legislative Affairs...Office of Senate Affairs

# Office of Senate Affairs

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Senate Affairs is responsible for the Department's day-to-day interaction with the U.S. Senate and its principal oversight committee -- Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the several other Senate Committees with interest and jurisdiction over the conduct of foreign affairs. This office tracks and works with Senate members and staff on foreign policy-related legislation, keeping Department officials informed of committee positions, and advancing Administration foreign policy goals on the Hill. The office also carries the responsibility for managing the Department's nominations and confirmation process and the ratification of treaties.				

Back to Top
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00046- CR

Ex parte Quincey Lakeith Gibson

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 277 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 08- 383- K2 77A, H ONO RAB LE K EN ANDERSON, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Gibson pleade d g uilty to the felony offe nse of possession of a c ontrolled substance and was sentenc ed to 45 y ear s’ imprisonment. This Court aff irmed Gibson’s conviction on appea l. S ee Gibson v. State , No. 03-09-00162- CR, 2009 Tex. App. L EXI S 7474 (Tex. App.—Au s t i n Sept. 25, 2009, no pet.).

Subsequently , Gibson filed with the district court an applicat ion for a post-conviction writ of habea s corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the code of criminal proce du re. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010). The district court enter ed an order rec ommending denial of the application and forwa rded a copy of its order to the court of criminal appea ls. Gibson has filed a

pro se notice of appe al in this Court from that order. I ntermedia t e courts of appea ls have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habea s corpus in felony case s. See Ex parte Alexande r , 685 S.W .2d 57, 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Martinez , 175 S.W .3d 510, 512-13 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2 005, orig

. proce eding );

see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (post-convic tion applications for writs of habea scorpus, for felony case s in w hich death penalty was not a ssessed, must be filed in c ourt of orig inal

conviction and made returna ble to court of criminal appea ls). The court of criminal appea ls has exclusive jurisdiction t o revie w the mer its of a post-conviction application for habe as re lief under article 11.07. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 5. Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction. 1

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Henson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Aug ust 25, 2011 Do Not Publish

I n this cause , Gibson has also filed a motion for ex tension of t ime to fi l e h i s b ri ef an d a 1 motion for appointment of counsel. I n light of our di sposition of t h i s appea l, we dism iss as m oot Gibson’s motions. 2
#### § 550.802 Delegation of certain authorities of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 14046 of September 17, 2021, and any further Executive orders issued pursuant to the national emergency declared therein, may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
122 STAT. 2914 PUBLIC LAW 110–290—JULY 30, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3564: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–390 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Oct. 22, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 154 (2008): June 27, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

July 14, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–290 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Administrative Conference of the United States through fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Improvement Act 

of 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Section 596 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to 

read as follows: 

‘‘§ 596. Authorization of appropriations 

‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 

subchapter not more than $3,200,000 for fiscal year 2009, 

$3,200,000 for fiscal year 2010, and $3,200,000 for fiscal year 2011. 

Of any amounts appropriated under this section, not more than 

$2,500 may be made available in each fiscal year for official representation and entertainment expenses for foreign dignitaries.’’. 

Approved July 30, 2008. 

5 USC 101 note. 

Regulatory 

Improvement Act 

of 2007. 

July 30, 2008 

[H.R. 3564] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLIC LAWS
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2019...Chapter 16: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019

# 									Chapter 16: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019							

2019 Digest: Chapter 16 [2 MB]

Tags

International LawLegal Adviser

Back to Top
§ 515.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Information and informational materials.* ( 1 ) The importation from any country and the exportation to any country of information or informational materials as defined in § 515.332, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission, are exempt from the prohibitions and regulations of this part except for payments owed to Cuba for telecommunications services between Cuba and the United States, which are subject to the provisions of § 515.542.
( 2 ) This section does not authorize transactions related to information or informational materials not fully created and in existence at the date of the transaction, or to the substantive or artistic alteration or enhancement of information or informational materials, or to the provision of marketing and business consulting services by a person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Such prohibited transactions include, without limitation, payment of advances for information or informational materials not yet created and completed, provision of services to market, produce or co-produce, create or assist in the creation of information or informational materials, and payment of royalties to a designated national with respect to income received for enhancements or alterations made by persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to information or informational materials imported from a designated national.
( 3 ) This section does not authorize transactions incident to the transmission of restricted technical data as defined in the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730-774, or to the exportation of goods for use in the transmission of any data. The exportation of such goods to designated foreign countries is prohibited, as provided in § 515.201 of this part and § 785.1 of the Export Administration Regulations.
( 4 ) This section does not authorize transactions related to travel to Cuba when such travel is not otherwise authorized under § 515.545. Note to paragraph ( a
):
See § 515.545 for general licenses authorizing certain travel-related and other transactions that are directly incident to the export, import, or transmission of informational materials and certain transactions related to the creation, dissemination, or artistic or other substantive alteration or enhancement of informational materials.
( b ) *Donation of food.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to transactions incident to the donation of food to nongovernmental organizations or individuals in Cuba.
[54 FR 5233, Feb. 2, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 39256, Aug. 2, 1995; 64 FR 25812, May 13, 1999; 81 FR 4584, Jan. 27, 2016]
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Water-Resources Investigation Report 00-4163

# Probability of Detecting Atrazine/Desethyl-Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrite Plus Nitrate as Nitrogen in Ground Water in the Idaho Part of the  Western Snake River Plain

As ground water continues to provide an ever-growing proportion of Idaho's drinking water, concerns about the quality of that resource are increasing.  Pesticides and nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen have been detected in many aquifers in the State.  To provide a sound hydrogeologic basis for atrazine and nitrate management in southern Idaho, the U.S. Geological Survey produced maps showing the probability of detecting these contaminants in ground water in the upper Snake River Basin (published in a 1998 report) and the western Snake River Plain (published in this report).

View Water-Resources Investigation Report 00-4163 PDF (841 KB)View Probability Map PDF format (968K)  View Probability Map GIF format (124K) 

Donato, M.M., 2000, Probability of detecting atrazine/desethyl-atrazine and elevated concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen in ground water in the Idaho part of the  western Snake River Plain: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report Report 00-4163, 25 p.

 

            - For additional information:  Director, Idaho Water Science Center,U.S. Geological Survey230 Collins RoadBoise, Idaho, 83702phone: 208-387-1300fax: 208-387-1372Web sitePublications Warehouse
Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it.
Download Adobe Reader
USGS HomeWater ResourcesBiologyGeographyGeologyGeospatial Program
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: id.water.usgs.gov/PDF/wri004163/index.html	Page Contact Information: Idaho Webmaster	Page Last Modified: Monday, 28-Jun-2010 15:15:21 EDT
#### Ex Parte Harold THORNTON. (Re: Harold Thornton v. State of Alabama).

No. 79-841.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1980.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and ALMON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May

16 , 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00366- CR

IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1604855



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 2, 2019, relator DeAndre DeBoest filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Josh Hill,2

presiding judge of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, to permit relator to proceed pro se in the underlying case

. Relator asserts that he h as filed at least nine motions to proceed pro se , has
demanded in open court that he be allowed to proceed pro se , and has refused to accept a court

- appointed attorney. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show that (1) the relator has no ade quate remedy at law for obtaining the relief the relator seeks; and (2) what the relator seeks to compel involves a ministerial act rather than a discretionary act. In re Powell , 516 S.W.3d 488, 494

– 95 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017). It is relator’s burden to provide a sufficient record to establish that relator is
entitled to relief. See In re Henry , 525 S.W.3d 381, 382 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Bates , 65 S.W.3d 133, 135 (Tex. App.— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to do so. Relator did not file a record with his petition containing the motions he purportedly filed, any rulings on his motions, any other relevant documents filed in the trial court, or any record of the proceeding in which relator claims that he demanded in open court that the trial court allow him to proceed pro se

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. Relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny his petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Poissant. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
§ 570.309 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 570.309 :
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
#### Donald R. MILLER, Agent v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 82-C-1094.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re Donald R. Miller, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Caddo. 412 So.2d 662.

Granted.
# Bureau of Counterterrorism Releases

620 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Morocco	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Israel, West Bank, and Gaza	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Iraq	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Egypt	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bahrain	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Algeria	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Türkiye	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sweden	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1…56789…62next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

MICHAEL GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

10544 ALTON AVE NE

SEATTLE, WA  98125

206.353.5736

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors & Audit Committee:

Chee Corp.       

 

 

We consent to the use of our report dated April 21, 2020 with respect to the financial statements of Chee Corp. as of January 31, 2020 and 2019 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the period then ended.  

 

 

 

Michael Gillespie & Associates, PLLC

Seattle, Washington

June 30, 2020

 

/S/ Michael Gillespie & Associates, PLLC
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LISA DUROW

, Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 443

[ April 20, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Michael A. Robinson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16

- 010199

.

Sunni DeGracia of David Low & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for

appellant.

Carri S. Leininger and Maureen Martinez of Williams, Leininger &

Crosby, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeAustria

# Austria

97 items

        -    Media Note  		67th Session of the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs	  March 14, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative to the Western Balkans Gabriel Escobar’s Travel to Belgium, Kosovo, Austria, and Montenegro	  March 10, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Shaping the Future of Nuclear Security	  March 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Expanding Exchange Opportunities Between the United States and Austria	  February 20, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor on International Disability Rights Minkara Travels to France, Germany, Italy, The Holy See, and Austria	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Vienna, Austria: The American International School Vienna: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  January 30, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S. – Austria Strategic Dialogue	  December 4, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Slovakia and Austria	  November 30, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Austria	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Vienna, Austria: The American International School Vienna: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 1, 2023 

previous page1234…10next page

Back to Top