alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 6.4 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and has complied with the requirements in Subpart B of this part.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $1 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $5 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141(a)) with not more than 500 employees, or
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $5 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the matter in controversy is primarily related to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual or group of individuals, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares of another business, or controls in any manner the election of a majority of that business's board of directors, trustees, or other persons exercising similar functions, will be considered an affiliate of that business for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
HomeOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice...Office of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice  Releases

# Office of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Releases

38 items

        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Cormier Smith’s Travel to Sri Lanka	  December 10, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Human Rights and Democracy  		Groundbreaking Initiative to Elevate Indigenous Youth Leaders	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Indigenous Youth Leadership Coalition Launches with Arrival of Inaugural Cohort	  November 6, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		International Day for People of African Descent	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 31, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for Special Representative Cormier Smith’s Participation in the Secretary’s Global Anti-Racism Champions Award Ceremony	  Desirée Cormier SmithAugust 9, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  At the First Annual Ceremony  for the Secretary of State’s Award for Global Anti-Racism Champions	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 9, 2023Dean Acheson AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Honor Global Anti-Racism Champions Awardees at the State Department	  August 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative Cormier Smith’s Travel to Colombia	  July 23, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The 28th Anniversary of the Srebrenica Genocide	  Matthew MillerJuly 11, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Delegation Travels to Bosnia and Herzegovina to Commemorate Srebrenica Genocide and Promote Peace and Tolerance	  July 10, 2023 

previous page1234next page

Back to Top
- Division Home
- About Us
- Contact Us

HomeCivil Air Transport Agreements...Current Air Transport Agreements

# 						Current Air Transport Agreements					

53 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202320222021202020192018201720162008

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAngolaArgentinaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusCanadaColombiaEcuadorGermanyGrenadaGuineaIcelandJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaMoldovaMongoliaMozambiqueNamibiaNetherlandsNorwayRepublic of the CongoSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSint MaartenSri LankaSurinameTanzaniaThe BahamasUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States

Select a Release TypeAir Transport Agreement

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Transportation Affairs

          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Signed Memorandum of Consultations and Initialed Air Transport Agreement Between the U.S. and  the Republic of Mozambique of December 06, 2023	  December 6, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Mongolia Air Transport Agreement	  August 4, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Twenty-fourth Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee 	  July 13, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Moldova Air Transport Agreement	  May 18, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Signed Memorandum of Consultations and Initialed Air Transport Agreement Between the U.S. and Angola of April 26, 2023	  April 26, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Signed Memorandum of Consultation and Initialed Air Transport Agreement Between the U.S. and Mongolia of January 24, 2023	  January 24, 2023 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S. – Ecuador Air Transport Agreement of November 16, 2022	  November 16, 2022 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Protocol of Amendment to The U.S.-Colombia Air Transport Agreement	  July 27, 2022 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Twenty-third Meeting of the U.S.-EU Joint Committee Record of Meeting	  June 9, 2022 
          -    Air Transport Agreement  		Air Transport Agreement between the U.S. and the Republic of Congo (entry into force on April 19, 2021)	  April 19, 2021 

123…6next page

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.41 Partial redemption.

A bond may be redeemed in part at current redemption value, but only in amounts corresponding to authorized denominations, upon surrender of the bond to a designated Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in accordance with § 360.39(b). In any case in which partial redemption is requested, the phrase “to the extent of $_____ (face amount) and reissue of the remainder” should be added to the request. Upon partial redemption of the bond, the remainder will be reissued as of the original issue date, as provided in subpart H of this part.
§ 510.511 Noncommercial, personal remittances. ( a ) ( 1 ) U.S. persons are authorized to send and receive and U.S. depository institutions, U.S.-registered brokers or dealers in securities, and U.S.-registered money transmitters are authorized to process transfers of funds to or from North Korea or for or on behalf of an individual ordinarily resident in North Korea, other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 510.201(a), in cases in which the transfers involve noncommercial, personal remittances, up to a maximum of $5,000 per year.
( 2 ) Noncommercial, personal remittances do not include charitable donations of funds to or for the benefit of an entity or funds transfers for use in supporting or operating a business, including a family-owned business.
( b ) The transferring institutions identified in paragraph (a) of this section may rely on the originator of a funds transfer with regard to compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, provided that the transferring institution does not know or have reason to know that the funds transfer is not in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) An individual who is a U.S. person is authorized to carry funds as a noncommercial, personal remittance, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, to an individual in North Korea or ordinarily resident in North Korea, other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 510.201(a), provided that the individual who is a U.S. person is carrying the funds on his or her behalf, not on behalf of another person.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1488

KATRINA L. WEBSTER; KIRK E. WEBSTER , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Secretary of Defense ; NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL

INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00009

- TSE

- MSN )

Submitted : October 1, 2021 Decided: October 6, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Katrina L. Webster and Kirk E. Webster , Appellants Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appell ees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Katrina L. Webster and Kirk E. Webster appeal the district court’s o rder dismissing their complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e

- 17 . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distric t court as to those claims preserved for appellate review

. ∗ Webster v. Austin , No. 1:20

- cv - 00009

- TSE

- MSN (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

∗ Appellants’ informal brief did not address their challenge to the processing of equal employment opportunity complaints or the district court’s conclusion that Katrina Webster’s claims against the Nationa l Geospatial

- Intelligence Agency were an improper attempt at claim splitting. Thus, we decline to consider these claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). And although Appellants challenge the district court’s failure to permit amendment to their complaint, the claim they now assert is different than those they asserted in the district court. Thus, the claim asserted on appeal is not pr eserved for appellate review.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
J. Yakatan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D.
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D.
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        May 14, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AVANIR Pharmaceuticals and will
be retained by AVANIR Pharmaceuticals and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
HomeBureau of Counterterrorism...Bureau of Counterterrorism and Countering Violent Extremism  Releases

# Bureau of Counterterrorism Releases

617 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar At the Munich Security Conference	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 17, 2024Bayerischer HofMunich, Germany 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Israeli President Isaac Herzog Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 17, 2024Bayerischer HofMunich, Germany 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks on Addressing Emerging Technology in the Realm of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism	  Ian MossFebruary 14, 2024London, United Kingdom 
        -    		Elizabeth Richard	  January 30, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 6, 2024Crete, Greece 
        -    Media Note  		Rewards for Justice: Reward Offer for Information on Hamas Financial Networks	  January 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States Hosts Quad Counterterrorism Working Group in Honolulu, Hawaii	  December 22, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Martha Raddatz of ABC This Week	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 10, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Jake Tapper of CNN State of the Union	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 10, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote: Countering Terrorism  		Progress in Repatriations: How Foreign Assistance Is Addressing the Humanitarian and Security Crises in Northeast Syria: Part 1 of 2	  December 4, 2023 

previous page1234…62next page

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Jennifer R. Littlejohn

# 				Jennifer R. Littlejohn			

															Acting Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs												

				May 1, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeCaribbean Basin Security Initiative...Caribbean Basin Security Initiative: Guyana

# 									Caribbean Basin Security Initiative: Guyana							

Guyana benefits directly from several of the CBSI programs described above, including:
        - Provision of three patrol boats with the required equipment and training to enable the Guyana Defence Force to combat transnational organized crime, patrol territorial waters, and ensure freedom of movement for commerce;
        - Training and equipment to increase the capabilities and effectiveness of police and customs units at ports of entry;
        - Providing equipment and training to police to establish a bike-patrol unit and support community-policing initiatives.
        - A community-based program approach that engages youth, family networks, community service providers and government agencies to reduce crime and violence and increase opportunities for youth;
        - Supporting juvenile justice reform that focuses on rehabilitation for juvenile offenders and reintegration of youth leaving detention facilities;
        - Improving crime and violence policy-making and programming through the use of quality, comparable, and reliable national citizen security information;
        - Partnerships with local organizations to provide rehabilitation for juvenile offenders, offer alternative sentencing options for youth who committed minor offenses, and support reintegration of youth leaving detention facilities;
        - Workforce development and educational support for at-risk youth;
        - Strengthening capability of law enforcement officials to respond to and investigate cases of gender-based violence to include sexual offenses, crimes against children, and trafficking in persons;
        - Increasing effective criminal investigations that lead to strong prosecutions and trials by enhancing the technical capacity of the police, prosecutors, and magistrates to work with criminal evidence in a supportive environment.
        - Mentoring, training and advising on maritime maintenance from the Technical Assistance Field Team to improve the operational readiness of their patrol boat fleet, to include equipment and software to ensure maintenance issues are being tracked.
        - Improved maritime domain awareness through the participation in the Cooperative Situational Information Integration Initiative that provides regional air and maritime tracks for operations.
        - Ongoing training and equipment for the maritime service to ensure U.S. provided vessels are maintained.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCaribbean Basin Security InitiativeGuyana

Back to Top
#### John C. KANNABY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 00-3259.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2001.

Before CLEVENGER, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John C. Kannaby petitions for review from the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) dismissing his case. *Kannaby v. Department of the Army,*86 M.S.P.R. 41 (2000). We *affirm.*

*770I

Mr. Kannaby was suspended for twelve days from Ms employment as a GS-11 Civil Engineer at the Army Corps of Engineers in Chicago, Illinois, on a charge of insubordination. Through counsel, Mr. Kannaby appealed the suspension order to the Board. The Administrative Judge (“AJ”) of the Board notified Mr. Kannaby that the Board likely did not have jurisdiction to hear his appeal, because the action of which he complained was not a suspension of more than fourteen days. The AJ offered Mr. Kannaby an opportumty to explain why the Board would have jurisdiction. Mr. Kannaby did not respond. Because the Board does not have jurisdiction to consider suspension orders when the suspension is not for more than fourteen days, *see*5 C.F.R. § 1201.3(a), the AJ dismissed Mr. Kannaby’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Board denied Mr. Kannaby’s petition for review on February 16, 2000. Mr. Kannaby timely petitioned this court for review of the Board’s final decision.

II

It is settled law that the Board has limited jurisdiction, and may oMy hear matters specified as appealable to the Board by statute, rule or regulation. *See Thomas v. United States,*709 F.2d 48, 49 (Fed.Cir.1983). It further is settled law that a suspension of fourteen days or less is not an appealable action. In order for a suspension order to be appealable to the Board, the suspension must last for more than fourteen days. *See*5 C.F.R. § 1201.3(a).

We must affirm a final decision of the Board unless we find it to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not m accordance with law. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1994).

In his petition to this court, Mr. Kannaby contends that his suspension resulted from his refusal to enter a hazardous workspace, in which he was allegedly exposed to bodily harm. He seeks, *inter alia,*monetary relief for the harm he says has been done to him. He also seeks removal from his record the fact of his suspension. The Board committed no error in holding that it lacked jurisdiction to question the basis for his twelve-day suspension.

As the Board’s brief to this court explains, the relief Mr. Kannaby seeks from this court is unavailable. We have no authority to decide whether there is merit to Mr. Kannaby’s allegations that he has been done harm by his agency for which he should be granted relief. The Board’s brief identifies the avenues that are open to Mr. Kannaby to pursue the relief to which he claims entitlement. The Board had no power to grant him relief, and neither do we. The final decision of the Board is affirmed.

No costs.
HomeTransportation Status Lists...01. Convention on International Civil Aviation, done at Chicago December 7, 1944

# 									01. Convention on International Civil Aviation, done at Chicago December 7, 1944							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force April 4, 1947.

The Convention, in accordance with the provisions of Article 91 (b) thereof, entered into force initially April 4, 1947. This Convention shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America, which shall give notice of the date deposit to each of the signatory and adhering States. As soon as this Convention has been ratified or adhered to by twenty-six States it shall come into force between them on the thirtieth day after deposit of the twenty-sixth instrument. It shall come into force for each State ratifying thereafter on the thirtieth day after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.
Download Status List						 [250 KB]

Tags

MultilateralTransportationTreaties

Back to Top