alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 584.306 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note to § 584.306 :
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
No. 99-8605.

#### Scott *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulations to Panama’s President-Elect Mulino

# 									Congratulations to Panama’s President-Elect Mulino							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 6, 2024

Congratulations to José Raúl Mulino on his victory as President-elect of the Republic of Panama.  I look forward to continuing our strategic partnership and advancing our shared goals of democratic governance and inclusive economic prosperity.

The United States commends the people of Panama who exercised their free will and voice, as well as the work of the Organization of American States’ electoral observers. The United States deeply values its relationship with the Republic of Panama, which has flourished for over 100 years, underpinned by strong economic, educational, and familial ties.

Looking ahead, the United States will continue to work with Panama on our common goals of inclusive, sustainable economic growth, bolstering citizen security, and cooperatively curbing irregular migration through the Darien.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPanamaThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 576.703 Penalty imposition.

If, after considering any written response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and any relevant facts, the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was a violation by the alleged violator named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and that a civil monetary penalty is appropriate, the Office of Foreign Assets Control may issue a Penalty Notice to the violator containing a determination of the violation and the imposition of the monetary penalty. For additional details concerning issuance of a Penalty Notice, see appendix A to part 501 of this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty Notice shall constitute final agency action. The violator has the right to seek judicial review of that final agency action in federal district court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Ground-Based Study on Extruder Standoff Distance for the 3D Printing in Zero Gravity Technology Demonstration MissionAnalysis of phase I specimens produced as part of the 3D printing in zero G technology demonstration mission exhibited some differences in structure and performance for specimens printed onboard the International Space Station (ISS) and specimens produced on the ground with the same printer prior to its launch. This study uses the engineering test unit for the printer, identical to the unit on ISS, to conduct a ground-based investigation of the impact of the distance between the extruder tip and the build tray on material outcomes. This standoff distance was not held constant for the phase I flight prints and is hypothesized to be a major source of the material variability observed in the phase I data set.Document ID20170005539Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPrater, T. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Bean, Q. A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Werkheiser, N. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Beshears, R. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Rolin, T. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Rabenberg, E. M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Soohoo, H. A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Ledbetter, F. E., III*(Wheelhouse Consulting, LLC Huntsville, AL, United States)*Bell, S. C.*(Jacobs Engineering and Science Services and Skills Augmentation Group (ESSSA) Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 14, 2017Publication DateJune 1, 2017Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceLunar And Planetary Science And ExplorationReport/Patent NumberM-1433NASA/TP-2017-219631Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005539.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs...Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs 2  Releases

# Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Releases

94 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov	  May 19, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC Andrea Mitchell Reports	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 6, 2021Hyatt Regency HotelKyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 3, 2021No. 9 DowningLondon, United Kingdom 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 22, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Community of Democracies 33rd Meeting of the Governing Council	  Roger D. CarstensApril 20, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Fourteenth Anniversary of Robert “Bob” Levinson’s Abduction	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 9, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute Release of Foreign Relations of the United States, 1981–1988, Volume IV, Soviet Union, January 1983–March 1985	  February 16, 2021 
        -    Video Remarks  		Video Remarks on the Declaration Against the Use of Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 15, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute Release of Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume E–15, Part 2, Documents on Western Europe, 1973–1976, Second, Revised Edition	  February 12, 2021 

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Francisco REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-1609.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 26, 2001.

*121Telesforo Del Valle Jr., N.Y., NY, for appellant.

Robert C. Juman, Ass’t U.S. Att’y, SDNY, N.Y., NY, for appellee.

Present JOHN M. WALKER, Jr., Chief Judge, KEARSE and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was submitted. Counsel for defendant Francisco Reyes has moved pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), to be relieved as counsel on the ground that the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The government has moved for summary affirmance. Reyes has filed a supplemental *pro se*brief, arguing that pursuant to *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), he was entitled to have the quantity of cocaine on which his sentence was based under the Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) determined beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that counsel’s motion to be relieved pursuant to *Anders v. California*is granted, and the government’s motion for summary affirmance is granted, on the ground that the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. A question of fact that affects a defendant’s Guidelines sentencing range only below a statutory maximum, and has no bearing on sentencing above a statutory maximum, and does not trigger a mandatory minimum, is a question to be decided by the sentencing judge, without need for a jury determination. *See United States v. Garcia,*2001 WL 167018, at *4 (2d Cir. Feb.20, 2001). Since the sentence imposed on Reyes was below the statutory maximum, and the quantity of narcotics found by the district court did not trigger a mandatory minimum, *Apprendi*is inapplicable.

We have considered all of Reyes’s arguments and have found in them no colorable merit. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
#### § 8.1 Scope.

This part contains rules governing the recognition of attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled practitioners, and other persons representing clients before the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
<HTML>
<HEAD>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<FONT SIZE=5><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=6><P ALIGN="CENTER">EXHIBIT 10.11</P>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=3><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
</B><P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>December 30, 1999</P>

<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>Moto Photo, Inc.</P>
<P>4444 Lake Center Drive</P>
<P>Dayton, OH 45426</P>
<P>Attn:  David A. Mason, Executive Vice President & Treasurer</P>

<P> </P>
<P>Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.</P>
<P>555 Taxter Road</P>
<P>Elmsford, NY 10523</P>
<P>Attn:  Jonathan F. File, Vice President and General Counsel</P>

</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE=3><P></P>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial" SIZE=3><P></FONT><FONT SIZE=3>mendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 2, 1999, said agreements together hereinafter called the "Loan Agreement."</P>

<P>Reference also is made to the Lien Subordination Agreement dated February 21, 1997 among Provident, Moto Photo and Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. ("Fuji"), said agreement hereinafter being referred to as the Lien Subordination Agreement.</P>

<P>Reference also is made to the Term Note dated December 30, 1999 in the principal amount of $2,700,000 from Moto Photo to Fuji, said note hereinafter being referred to as the Term Note.</P>

<P>Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, Provident is providing certain financing accommodations to Moto Photo and Moto Photo has granted to Provident a first priority security interest in all of Moto Photo's Accounts, Notes Receivable, Equipment, General
Intangibles and Inventory to secure such financing.</P>

<P>Pursuant to the Lien Subordination Agreement, Provident's security interest in Accounts and Inventory originating from Fuji is subordinated to any security interest of Fuji in the Fuji Accounts and Inventory.</P>

<P>By executing copies of this Letter, Provident, Moto Photo and Fuji acknowledge and reaffirm their respective positions as provided in the Lien Subordination Agreement.</P>

<P>Moto Photo and Fuji further acknowledge and agree that upon the occurrence of an Event of Default as defined in Section 9.1 of the Loan Agreement, Moto Photo thereupon, and for the duration of such Event of Default or until otherwise agreed by
Provident, shall cease making payments to Fuji upon the Term Note.</P>

<P>Please indicate your concurrence with the foregoing by dating, signing and returning a copy of this letter to the undersigned.</P>

<P>					Sincerely,</P>

<P>					The Provident Bank</P>
<P>	</P>
<P>					By:  <U>							</P>
</U>
<P>Agreed and Acknowledged:</P>

<P>Moto Photo, Inc.</P>

<P>By: <U>							</U>  Date: <U>				</P>
</U>
<P> </P>
<P>Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.</P>

<P>By: <U>							 </U> Date: <U>				</P>
</U><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P></FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2695

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

droelectric projects in the State of Pennsylvania.Act applicable to the construction of certain hy-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2695

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of certain hydroelectric projects

in the State of Pennsylvania.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2695 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

2 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time limita3 tions of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

4 806), upon the request of the licensee for the project con5 cerned, and after reasonable notice, the Federal Energy

6 Regulatory Commission shall, in accordance with the good

7 faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of

8 such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under

9 such section, extend the time required for commencement

10 of construction of each the following projects until Sep11 tember 26, 1999:

12 (1) FERC Project No. 4474.

13 (2) FERC Project No. 7041.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

15 for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued

16 by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power

17 Act (16 U.S.C. 806)) of the period required for commence18 ment of construction of the project concerned.

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 17,332.

#### Williamson *v.*The State, ex rel.

From the De Kalb Circuit Court.

*C. M. Phillips,*for appellant.

*A. C. Smith,*Attorney-General, and *J. Butler,*Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Coffey, J.

This was a prosecution by the State against the appellant, Norris Williamson, under the statute providing for surety of the peace. A trial of the cause by a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the State, upon which the court, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment, and required the appellant to enter into bond to keep the peace.

*700Filed Sept. 19, 1894.

The appellant assigns as error, in this court, that the circuit court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

The only question presented for our consideration, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

We have carefully read the evidence in the cause, and while we find that it is not as satisfactory as could be wished, it can not be said it does not tend to support the verdict. There is evidence in the cause tending to support every material charge in the affidavit upon which the prosecution rests. Its weight was wholly for the jury. We can not disturb the verdict on the weight of the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orrin SHAID Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85-2743

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1986.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 9, 1986.

Orrin Shaid, Jr., pro se.

*183Bob Wortham, U.S. Atty., Dane Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tyler, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEE, RUBIN and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Orrin Shaid, Jr., a “charismatic 300-pound east Texan” according to our opinion reported at 730 F.2d 227 — one in which his spirited adventures as a confidence man and bank fraud are detailed — appeals the dismissal of his §. 2255 motion to vacate the sentence imposed upon him by Judge William Wayne Justice. Most of his contentions are of a sort with that complaining that his motion was assigned a civil docket number, rather than filed in the original criminal action, and do not merit discussion. Among them are complaints of failure to appoint counsel to represent him in connection with the motion, failure to permit discovery and hold an evidentiary hearing, failure to grant a general “Motion to Inspect,” and the refusal of a magistrate to stand recused.

Shaid’s chief complaint is of a failure of Judge Justice to stand recused *sua sponte,*in view of his friendship with named persons connected with two banks that Shaid had defrauded. Judge Steger found, however, in passing on Shaid’s present motion, that Judge Justice knew nothing of his friends’ connection with these banks until Shaid’s present motion was filed, a finding which is not erroneous — clearly or otherwise. As for Shaid’s claim that his 35-year sentence was so harsh as to constitute ostensible evidence of the trial judge’s want of impartiality. Judge Steger determined that Judge Justice merely followed the probation officer’s recommendation in this respect — one which, in view of Shaid’s lurid exploits, prior criminal record, and 101-year sentencing exposure, was not disproportionately severe.

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Lion Copolymer Holdings, LLC, Appellants/Cross-Appellee

v. Lion Polymers, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and AFWest 

Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia, Appellees

Appellate case number: 01-16-00848-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-10394

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Appellant/Cross-Appellee Lion Copolymer Holdings, LLC (“Company”), Appellee/CrossAppellant Lion Polymers, LLC (“Lion Polymers”) and Appellees AFWest Chemicals, Ltd. and 

Vijay Goradia have filed an “Agreed Motion to Amend Current Briefing Schedule and to Exceed 

Word Count.” The motion is granted. The briefing schedule and word counts are amended as 

follows:

 The Company’s opening appellant’s brief is due on January 20, 2017.

 Lion Polymers’ combined appellee’s and cross-appellant’s brief is due on February 20, 

2017 (30 days after the Company files its appellant’s brief). The combined brief shall 

contain no more than 30,000 words.

 The Company’s combined cross-appellee’s and reply brief is due on March 22, 2017

(30 days after Lion Polymers files its appellee’s and cross-appellant’s brief). The 

combined brief shall contain no more than 22,500 words.

 The brief of appellees AFWest Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia is due on March 22, 

2017 (30 days after Lion Polymers files its cross-appellant’s brief).

 Lion Polymers’ reply brief will be due on April 11, 2017 (20 days after the crossappellee’s brief is filed by the Company and the appellees’ brief is filed by AFWest 

Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Rebeca Huddle_

 Acting individually

Date: December 8, 2016
HomeFrance

# France

369 items

        -    TIAS  		France (02-502) – Agreement Concerning the Application of Article VIII of the Agreement Between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of their Forces of June 19, 1951	  May 2, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		France (02-201) – Treaty on Extradition	  February 1, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		France (13010) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  December 1, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		France (01-205) – Agreement Concerning Payments for Certain Losses During World War II	  February 5, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		France (00-918) – Agreement for Cooperation in Advanced Nuclear Reactor Science and Technology	  September 18, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		France (12965) – Air Transport Agreement	  June 18, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		France (12823) – Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation in the Jason Program	  December 20, 1996 
        -    		Bobby  Romero	  March 1, 1978 
        -    DS Memorial  		Bobby Romero	  March 1, 1978 

previous page1…353637

Back to Top
# Iran

595 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Targets Qods Force, Houthi, and Hizballah Facilitators of Terrorism	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Imposing Sanctions on Networks Supporting Iran’s Ballistic Missile, Defense, and Nuclear Programs	  Matthew MillerMarch 20, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 14, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 14, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Coordinated Actions with Bahrain against Supporters of Al-Ashtar Brigades	  Matthew MillerMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 11, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 6, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 6, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 4, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 4, 2024Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…34567…60next page

Back to Top
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**  I, Michael C. Mayer, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this annual report on Amendment Number One to Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date.5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors; (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified forthe registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls: and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and6) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.   */s/*MICHAEL C. MAYER   Michael C. Mayer  President & Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  Dated March 22, 2006