alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2926

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to

the products of certain nonmarket economy countries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. EWING (for himself, Mr. DREIER, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, and

Mr. MANZULLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation

treatment) to the products of certain nonmarket economy

countries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Export Market Sta5 bilization Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.

7 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding title IV of the

8 Trade Act of 1974, nondiscriminatory treatment (most9 favored-nation treatment) shall apply to the products of
2

•HR 2926 IH

1 each country set forth in subsection (b) that is either a

2 member of the World Trade Organization or has entered

3 into a bilateral commercial agreement referred to in sec4 tion 405 of that Act that has taken effect as provided in

5 section 405(c) of that Act, and is in effect.

6 (b) LIST OF COUNTRIES.—The countries referred to

7 in subsection (a) are the following:

8 (1) Albania.

9 (2) Armenia.

10 (3) Azerbaijian.

11 (4) Belarus.

12 (5) China.

13 (6) Georgia.

14 (7) Kazakhstan.

15 (8) Kyrgyzstan.

16 (9) Moldova.

17 (10) Mongolia.

18 (11) Tajikistan.

19 (12) Turkmenistan.

20 (13) Ukraine.

21 (14) Uzbekistan.

22 (15) Bulgaria.

23 (16) Romania.

24 (17) Russia.
3

•HR 2926 IH

1 (c) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

2 During any period in which nondiscriminatory treatment

3 applies to the products of a country under subsection (a),

4 title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall not apply to that

5 country.

6 (d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—General Note 3(b)

7 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

8 is amended by striking ‘‘Azerbaijian’’.

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment under

11 section 2 to the products of a country shall apply with

12 respect to goods of that country that are entered, or with13 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

14 15th day after such extension.

Æ
### Multibeam Sonar Mapping and Modeling of a Submerged Bryophyte Mat in Crater Lake, Oregon

By: Peter Dartnell**Robert CollierMark BuktenicaSteven JessupScott GirdnerPeter Triezenberg**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds366

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
- Home
- Cases Filed Against the Republic of Colombia

HomeU.S.-Colombia TPA Investor-State Arbitrations...Cases Filed Against the Republic of Colombia

# 									Cases Filed Against the Republic of Colombia							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

        - **Neustar v. Colombia**
        - Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia
        - Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis, and Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia 
        - Angel Samuel Seda and others v. Republic of Colombia 

Tags

ArbitrationColombiaFree Trade AgreementsLegal Adviser

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               2,591 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,402 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           204 
<INVENTORY>                                            252 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,015 
<PP&E>                                               4,793 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,303 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      10,027 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,604 
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               31,202 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                 0 
<OTHER-SE>                                         (24,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        10,027 
<SALES>                                              9,455 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,455 
<CGS>                                                8,613 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9,396 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      17 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         42 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     42 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         109 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                           151 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06 
                                                           

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-70,853] 

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed by a company official on June 2, 2009 on behalf of workers of Parkdale Mills, Inc., Gastonia, North Carolina. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-20453 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 560.554 Importation and exportation of services related to conferences in the United States or third countries authorized. ( a ) Subject to the restrictions in paragraph (c) of this section, the importation of Iranian-origin services into the United States or other dealing in such services and the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply of services from the United States or by a U.S. person are authorized where such services are performed or provided in the United States by or for a person who is ordinarily resident in Iran, other than the Government of Iran, an Iranian financial institution, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211, for the purpose of, or which directly relate to, participating in a public conference, performance, exhibition or similar event, and such services are consistent with that purpose.
( b ) To the extent not otherwise exempt from the prohibitions of this part and subject to the restrictions in paragraph (c) of this section, the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply of services directly related to the sponsorship by a U.S. person of a public conference or other similar public event in a third country that is attended by persons who are ordinarily resident in Iran, other than the Government of Iran, an Iranian financial institution, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211, is authorized, provided that attendance and participation at the conference or other similar public event is open for the public and that the conference or other similar event is not tailored in whole or in part to or for Iran or persons who are ordinarily resident in Iran.
( c ) This section does not authorize: ( 1 ) Any release of technology or software to a person who is ordinarily resident in Iran; and
( 2 ) The exportation, reexportation, sale or supply of services, or the importation of Iranian-origin services or other dealing in such services, related to the petroleum or petrochemical industries, energy development, crude oil or natural gas, pipelines, or the oil services industry.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERT REPELITA MAMBOU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70557

Agency No. A078-020-321

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Albert Repelita Mambou, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse

of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383

FILED

JUL 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70557

F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition

for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mambou’s motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of law or fact in the

BIA’s October 13, 2007, order dismissing his appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1);

see also Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n.2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc)

(purpose of a motion to reconsider is “to demonstrate that the IJ or the BIA erred as

a matter of law or fact.”).

To the extent Mambou challenges the BIA’s October 30, 2007, order

dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his

withholding of removal application, we lack jurisdiction because this petition for

review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th

Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
§ 585.307 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 585.307 .
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
#### Delmar L. APPENFELDT, Laura K. Guild, Osceola Devco, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Frederick J. Schramm, Jr., Appellants, v. Ronald W. QUINN and wife, Mary Lou Quinn, and John W. Tivnan and wife, Helen F. Tivnan, Appellees.

No. 80-2099

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 5, 1981.

Sherwood L. Stokes, Haines City, for appellants.

Thomas C. Floyd of Wheeler, Traviss & Floyd, Winter Haven, for appellees.

HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellants maintain that the trial court erred when it denied their motion for a temporary injunction, refused to reform certain deeds, and granted appellees’ motion for attorney fees. We find appellants’ first and second contentions unpersuasive. We agree, however, that the award of attorney fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1979), was improper.

Section 57.105 requires that, in a civil action, attorney fees be awarded to the prevailing party if the court determines that there was “a complete absence of a justiciable issue” raised by the opposing party. An award of fees under that section is proper only where “the action is so clearly devoid of merit *both*on the facts and the law as to be completely untenable.” *Allen v. Estate of Dutton,*384 So.2d 171, 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Appellants’ cause of action in the instant case does not fall within this category.

We reverse the award of attorney fees and remand the case for the entry of an amended final judgment consistent with this opinion.

RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 2670

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

AN ACT

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held

by the United States in certain property located in the

County of Iosco, Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2670 RFS

1 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST RE2 GARDING CERTAIN PROPERTY IN IOSCO

3 COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

4 (a) RELEASE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Agri5 culture shall release the reversionary interest of the Unit6 ed States in the parcel of real property described in sub7 section (b), which was retained by the United States when

8 the property was conveyed to the County of Iosco, Michi9 gan, in 1960 pursuant to a deed recorded at Liber 144,

10 beginning page 58, in the land records of the County.

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The parcel of real

12 property referred to in subsection (a) consists of 1.92

13 acres in the County of Iosco, Michigan, and is described

14 as follows:

That part of the N.W. 1⁄4 of the S.E. 1 15 ⁄4 of Sec16 tion 11, T.22 N.R. 8 East., Baldwin Township,

17 Iosco County, Michigan described as follows: Com18 mencing at the Center of said Section 11, thence

19 South 89 degrees, 15′ 41′′ East, along the EastWest 1 20 ⁄4 Line of said Section 11, 102.0 feet, thence

21 South 00 degrees 08′ 07′′ East, along an existing

22 fence line, 972.56 feet, thence North 89 degrees 07′

13′′ W. 69.70 feet to a point in the North-South 1 23 ⁄4

24 Line, thence North 02 degrees 02′ 12′′ West, along

said North-South 1 25 ⁄4 Line, 973.42 feet to the Point

26 of Beginning.
3

HR 2670 RFS

1 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary may require

2 such terms or conditions in connection with the release

3 under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate

4 to protect the interests of the United States.

5 (d) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary shall

6 execute and file in the appropriate office or offices a deed

7 of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument

8 effectuating the release of the reversionary interest under

9 this section.

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11


                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED               SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                             JUNE 30,                         JUNE 30,
                                                   ---------------------------      ---------------------------
                                                      2000            1999             2000            1999
                                                   -----------     -----------      -----------     -----------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
Net income (loss)                                  $ 2,261,307     $(1,658,964)     $ 2,777,129     $(1,513,932)
                                                   ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                            9,429,985       7,686,180        9,422,501       7,670,742

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options                460,213          86,081          385,494         217,712

Convertible preferred stock                               --              --               --              --

Subtraction of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                       --           (86,081)            --          (217,712)
                                                   -----------     -----------      -----------     -----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                              9,890,198       7,686,180        9,807,995       7,670,742
                                                   ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========



Basic net income (loss) per share                  $      0.24     $     (0.22)     $      0.29     $     (0.20)
                                                   ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========


Diluted net income (loss) per share                $      0.23     $     (0.22)     $      0.28     $     (0.20)
                                                   ===========     ===========      ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Real Estate Associates Limited V (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
- Office Home
- OECD
- US Mission to the OECD

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs...Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy

# Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy

					Subscribe					

## 				Strategic Planning, Media Engagement, and Economic Outreach			

					The Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy leads the bureau’s strategic planning, support for economic officers’ development, media engagement, and outreach on U.S. economic and business affairs.  We explain how smart economic policy expands opportunities for Americans and fosters a more prosperous and secure future.  We also lead U.S. policy in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to harmonize best economic practices across nations.				

Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy

Troy Pederson

							Follow Us:																			TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

Back to Top
No. D-2122.

#### In re Disbarment of Arnold.

Robert R. Arnold, of Wichita, Kan., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Philippines

# 									Counselor Chollet’s Travel to Indonesia and Philippines							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 12, 2023

Counselor Derek Chollet will travel to Indonesia and the Philippines July 13-17.

In Jakarta, Counselor Chollet will accompany Secretary Blinken and other senior U.S. officials at the annual U.S.-ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, and ASEAN Regional Forum July 13-14.

The Counselor will then visit Manila July 15-17 to consult with our Philippine allies on a range of bilateral and regional priorities, including opportunities to increase economic cooperation between the United States and the Philippines, bolstering deterrence, and addressing the ongoing crisis in Burma.

While in the Philippines, the Counselor will meet with Secretary of Foreign Affairs Enrique Manalo and National Security Advisor Eduardo Año.  He will also engage with civil society and review the latest conditions in the South China Sea.

Tags

Association of Southeast Asian NationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaCounselor of the DepartmentIndonesiaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPhilippinesU.S.-ASEAN Summit

Back to Top
#### § 558.206 Exempt transactions.

The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions that are exempt pursuant to section 203(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)).
HomeCzech Republic

# Czech Republic

106 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Prague and the Munich Security Conference	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Uzra Zeya’s Remarks at the IRFBA Ministerial Evening Reception	  Uzra ZeyaNovember 28, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Uzra Zeya’s Remarks at the Panel Session Announcing the IRFBA Ministerial Inter-Faith Football Exhibition Match	  Uzra ZeyaNovember 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to the Czech Republic and Moldova	  November 27, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States Launches Project Phoenix to Accelerate the Adoption of Advanced Clean Energy Technologies in Europe	  November 9, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Prague, Czech Republic: International School of Prague: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Czech Republic National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Elizabeth Allen’s Travel to Norway, Bulgaria, and the Czech Republic	  October 27, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Czech Republic (23-922) – Defense Cooperation Agreement	  September 22, 2023 

previous page1234…11next page

Back to Top