alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CSA Income
Fund IV Limited Partnership's Statement of Financial Position as of September
30, 1997 and Statement of Operations for the nine months then ended and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,773,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,711,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      57,010,225
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,648,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,846,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,984,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,846,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,587,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,372,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             661,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,362,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,362,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,362,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.62
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant maintains an unclassified Statement of Financial Position
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Marvin Forrest FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 542.301 Blocked account; blocked property. The terms *blocked account* and *blocked property* shall mean any account or property subject to the prohibitions in § 542.201 held in the name of the Government of Syria or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201, or in which such person has an interest, and with respect to which payments, transfers, exportations, withdrawals, or other dealings may not be made or effected except pursuant to an authorization or license from OFAC expressly authorizing such action. Note 1 to § 542.301 :
*See* § 542.411 concerning the blocked status of property and interests in property of an entity that is directly or indirectly owned, whether individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201.
[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 78473, Dec. 21, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEROME PORTIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 470 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
In the Court of Criminal 

Appeals of Texas

══════════

No. WR-75,547-03

══════════

EX PARTE BOBBY PEREZ,

Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Cause No. 02-02-8656-1-CR in the 454th District Court

From Medina County

═══════════════════════════════════════

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which KELLER, P.J., and 

SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

Applicant was convicted in 2002 of murder and sentenced to fifty

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

In March 2022, Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas 

corpus in the county of conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In 

his application, he alleges, among other things, that his plea was 
PEREZ – 2

involuntary because his trial counsel was ineffective. 

Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to 

further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write 

separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and 

its possible application to this case. See Ex parte Smith, 444 S.W.3d 661 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to sua 

sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille, ___ S.W.3d ___, 

No. WR-89,851-02, 2022 WL 108348 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 2022) 

(Yeary, J., concurring).

The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this 

one. Applicant’s trial occurred in 2002, but this writ application was not 

filed until almost twenty years later.1 The record is also silent regarding 

circumstances that may excuse Applicant’s delay, and at least some 

explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided.

Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “may sua 

sponte consider and determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith, 

444 S.W.3d at 667. If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the 

opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay, and give the State’s 

prosecutors and/or former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state 

whether Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their ability to 

defend against Applicant’s claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial 

court may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the 

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the 

diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of 

the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years 

after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe, 132 S.W.3d 434, 437–39 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)). 
PEREZ – 3

doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order.

With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED: June 8, 2022

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,514
<SECURITIES>                                 1,299,360
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                   245,633
<INVENTORY>                                    289,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               524,061
<PP&E>                                         739,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                 708,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,562,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,527,902
<BONDS>                                        493,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,794
<COMMON>                                        20,207
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,999,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,562,251
<SALES>                                        661,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               661,877
<CGS>                                          451,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               799,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   958
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (957,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (589,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (957,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>
# Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Releases

52 items

        -    Media Note  		Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Hosts Symposium on Effective Action to Confront Online Antisemitism	  May 24, 2024 
        -    Other Release  		Statement from the Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism on the Symposium on Collaborative Action against Online Antisemitism	  May 23, 2024 
        -    Testimony  		Hearing Transcript: The Agents of Antisemitism in Latin America	  Deborah LipstadtMarch 7, 2024House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Western HemisphereWashington, D.C. 
        -    Testimony  		Testimony Before the House Foreign Affairs Western Hemisphere Subcommittee	  Deborah LipstadtMarch 7, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Release of Best Practices for Restitution of Nazi-Confiscated Art	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Video Remarks  		Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken Video Remarks at the 25th Anniversary of the Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art and Best Practices Event	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 5, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		From Right to Left and In Between: Jew-hatred Across the Political Divide	  Deborah LipstadtFebruary 21, 2024Birkbeck, University of London 
        -    Press Statement  		International Holocaust Remembrance Day	  January 27, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Ambassador Lipstadt’s Participation at the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust	  Deborah LipstadtJanuary 26, 2024United NationsNew York City, New York 
        -    Media Note  		Statement on the 80th Anniversary of FDR’s War Refugee Board	  January 25, 2024 

123…6next page

Back to Top
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 10:56 AM To: Hutson, Nick Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve; Szabo, Aaron Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble and Reg text Attachments: SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO 12866_13563_111 (b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 Final_supplementaldata.docx



### Attached please find supplemental data provided by interagency commenters as part of their review of t he draft final rule -- Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed St ationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any quest ions or would like to discuss.

Nathan
§ 569.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 569.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 569.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 569.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 569.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
#### § 11.8 Reports.

This section establishes a Department of the Treasury reporting requirement to comply with 34 CFR 395.38. At the end of each fiscal year, each property managing bureau shall submit a report to the Director, Office of Management Support Systems, Departmental Offices, containing the elements set forth in 34 CFR 395.38. The Director, Office of Management Support Systems, shall submit a consolidated report to the Secretary of Education after the end of the fiscal year.
<PAGE>


                             PROMISSORY NOTE


$62,073.00                                               December 15, 1997


The undersigned hereby promises to pay to the order of the California 
Culinary Academy, Inc. (the "Holder") at its principal business office at 625 
Polk Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 the sum of $62,073.00 together with 
interest thereon at the rate of 9.5% per annum without compounding on the 
unpaid balance hereof in a single payment due on or before June 30, 1998.


/s/ Grover T. Wickersham
----------------------------
Grover T. Wickersham
SCOT-21-0000041
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

In the Matter of the Application of MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIMITED For Approval of Power Purchase Agreement for Renewable Dispatchable Generation with Paeahu Solar LLC.

APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

(Agency Docket No. 2018-0433)
ORDER OF CORRECTION ( B y : W i l s o n , J
. ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Dissenting Opinion filed on March 2, 2022, is corrected as follows:

On Page 1, the title of the opinion “DISSENTING OPINION BY WILSON, J.” is corrected to read “CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY WILSON, J.”

On Page 2, Line 10 the sentence “Accordingly, I respectfully dissent and would remand for PUC to determine whether a reasonable allegation of harm was made.” is corrected to read “Accordingly, I respectfully dissent to the Majority’s affirmance of the PUC’s approval of the power purchase agreement Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-21-0000041 04-MAR-2022 04:08 PM Dkt. 201 OCORand would remand for the PUC to determine whether a reasonable

allegation of harm was raised. I concur in all other respects with the Majority decision, including the recognition of the right to a life-sustaining climate system.”

On Page 12, Line 5 the word “about” is corrected to read “addressing”.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 4, 2022. /s/ Michael D. Wilson Associate Justice

2
Exhibit 99.1

EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
612 Main Street
Emlenton, PA 16373


                Emclaire Financial Corp. Extends Stock Repurchase

For Immediate Release
Monday, May 8, 2000


Contact:      David L. Cox, President or,
              John J. Boczar, Chief Financial Officer
              Emclaire Financial Corp.
              724/867-2311

Emlenton, PA -- Emclaire Financial Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board - "EMCF"), the
parent holding company of The Farmers National Bank of Emlenton, today announced
that it has received the necessary Board approval to extend its repurchase plan
covering up to 5% or 69,792 shares of the Company's common stock. Under the
terms of the plan announced November 4, 1999 the shares are to be purchased from
time-to-time in open market and privately negotiated transactions subject to the
availability of stock, the terms of the plan and other financial and market
conditions.

As of May 5, 2000 the original expiration date of the plan, 48,969 shares have
been repurchased at a total cost of approximately $756,000, representing an
average cost of $15.44 per share.

Emclaire Financial Corp. with consolidated total assets of $194.6 million at
March 31, 2000, is the parent company of The Farmers National Bank of Emlenton,
a community commercial bank operating eleven offices in Venango, Butler,
Clarion, Clearfield, Elk and Jefferson counties, Pennsylvania. Emclaire's common
stock is quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol "EMCF".
#### MELROSE ASSOCIATES, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-5022.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 12, 2001.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Frances NORMAN v. PHIL A SAC, INC., et al.

No. 64520.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

In re Frances Norman applying for writ of certiorari, Third Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of St. Landry. 368 So.2d 739.

Writ denied.
Amd. No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement - Keith A. Wilson



 Exhibit 10.38 
 Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Keith A. Wilson 
 This Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Affinia Group Inc. (the
“Company”) and Keith A. Wilson (“Executive”) is made this 29th day of August 2012. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings assigned to such terms under the Agreement. 

The Company and Executive have determined that it is in their best interests to amend the Agreement to provide for an automatic extension
of the Employment Term upon the occurrence of a Change of Control. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows: 

1. Term of Employment. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add a new proviso at the end of the last sentence of
Section 1 to read as follows: 
 “; provided further that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in
the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan) during the Employment Term, the Employment Term shall be automatically extended until the first December 31 following the 24 month anniversary of the Change of Control date.”

 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall be and remain unchanged and the Agreement as amended
hereby shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed. 
  

			
	AFFINIA GROUP INC.
		
		 	 /s/ Terry R. McCormack

	By:	 	Terry R. McCormack
		 	Chief Executive Officer
		
		 	 /s/ Keith A. Wilson

		 	Keith A. Wilson
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Oligosaccharides Autimicrobial 
and Prebiotic--RFA.
    Date: February 26, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Peter Zelazowski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, 301-435-
6902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4b4a1b0a1b6eabea1a8a5beabb3b7afad84aaadaceaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdcdd8c9d8cf93c7d8d1dcc7d2caced6d4fdd3d4d593dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-1967 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 44.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for tax on wagers under sections 4401 or 4411 pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78457, Dec. 22, 2008]