alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeEswatini

# Eswatini

52 items

        -    		CFM (Community Focal Mothers): Improving mother-baby pair (MBP) retention in integrated maternal and child health and HIV services in Eswatini	  December 21, 2018 
        -    Report  		Eswatini	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Eswatini	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  April 20, 2018 
        -    		CommLink: Linking People Living with HIV from Community-Based Settings to Care and Treatment Services in Eswatini	  February 7, 2018 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…3456next page

Back to Top
#### ALLSTATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION of Florida, Appellant, v. ALPHA MOTORS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation d/b/a Eastern Equipment Leasing Co., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-818.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 25, 1974.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1974.

*101Elliot L. Miller, Miami, for appellant.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart Proenza & Richman, Kenneth J. Weil and Thomas L. Ford, Miami, for appellees.

Before CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and MOORE, JOHN H., II, Associate Judge.

CORRECTED OPINION.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from a summary judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action.

The mortgage was made by a guarantor on a lease of personal property (restaurant equipment), to the lessor, as further security for performance by the lessee. •

The appellant purchased the mortgaged real estate (subject to the mortgage) at an execution sale thereof. Thereafter, following default by the lessee, the lessor filed this action for foreclosure of the security mortgage. The court held certain defenses raised by the appellant were without merit, and upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, supported by evidence including admission by the guarantor of the correctness of the amount claimed to be due to the lessor, granted summary judgment for foreclosure.

The rejection of the asserted defenses was not error. Spinney v. Winter Park Building & Loan Ass’n, 120 Fla. 453, 162 So. 899. Refusal of the court to permit the defendant to have discovery as to whether fire insurance was recovered (when the leased property was destroyed by fire) was not harmful error, in that receipt of insurance money by the lessor for the loss of its leased property would be immaterial, and not operate to reduce the lessee’s obligations under the lease, not otherwise therein provided for.

No reversible error having been shown, the judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6502

ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

and 

JOHN BEVERLY; ANTHONY SHAW; TYRONE TROWELL; THOMAS ROSE, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the VADOC; A. DAVID ROBINSON, VADOC 

Chief of Correctional Operations; DAVID ANDERSON, Warden at RNCC; 

GLOBAL TEL LINK (GTL), 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:22-cv-00080-MFU-JCH) 

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6502 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Askari Danso MS Lumumba, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6502 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM: 

Askari Danso MS Lumumba appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. Lumumba v. Clarke, No. 7:22-cv-00080-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. May 

11, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6502 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
QuickLinks

Exhibit 10(n) 

**FIRST AMENDMENT**

    THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of this 1st day of August, 2000 (the "Effective Date"), between Minntech Corporation, a Minnesota corporation(the "Company") and Thomas J. McGoldrick ("McGoldrick"). 

***RECITALS***

    WHEREAS, the Company and McGoldrick have previously entered into a Separation and Consulting Agreement dated July 7, 2000 (the "Agreement"); and 

    WHEREAS,both parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in this First Amendment. 

    NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and therein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 

    1.  Section 3e. shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor: 

    "e.*  Time.*  At the Company's request, McGoldrick shall devote up to an average of 40 hours permonth to his duties as a Consultant. If at the time of such request McGoldrick reasonably demonstrates to the Company that he is engaged in other business activities which would substantiallyinterfere with McGoldrick's ability to provide up to an average of 40 hours per month to the Company, the Company shall release McGoldrick from the foregoing obligation. Notwithstanding theforegoing, McGoldrick shall be obligated to provide a minimum of at least 4 hours per month to his duties as a Consultant." 

    Theremainder of the Agreement shall stay in full force and effect.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,630,086
<SECURITIES>                                11,152,823
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,111,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                   341,963
<INVENTORY>                                  5,711,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,788,174
<PP&E>                                      35,994,251
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,864,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,997,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,444,134
<BONDS>                                      4,345,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       410,579
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,035,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,997,255
<SALES>                                     29,708,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,708,636
<CGS>                                       19,902,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,027,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,995,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   675,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,508,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,322)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,513,932)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
#### Marshall MOUNGER, Appellant, v. Nora Yvonne MOUNGER, Appellee.

No. 74-31.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2816 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2816

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To reinstate the license for, and extend the deadline under the 
 Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric 
                project in Ohio, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2816

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To reinstate the license for, and extend the deadline under the 
 Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric 
                project in Ohio, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE AND EXTENSION DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the expiration of the license and notwithstanding 
the time period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission project numbered 3218, the Commission shall, at the request 
of the licensee for the project, reinstate the license effective 
September 25, 1993, and extend the time period during which the 
licensee is required to commence the construction of the project so as 
to terminate on September 24, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cytogen Corporation (the
      "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
      Kevin J. Bratton, Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, based
      upon my knowledge:




(1)        The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Dated:November
                14, 2007
            /s/
                  KEVIN J. BRATTONKevin
                J. BrattonSenior
                Vice President, Finance, and
              Chief
                Financial
                Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting
                Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lionel C. DUGAR v. Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Orleans Parish, Criminal Judicial District Court.

No. 65688.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1979.

In re Lionel C. Dugar, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. Number unknown.

Writ denied. Moot.
OLEM/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460 

## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)
*** NPL Site *** April 2016 

### FORMER KIL -TONE COMPANY Vineland, New Jersey Cumberland County  **Site Location :**  The Former Kil

- Tone Company (FKT) site is located at 527 East Chestnut Avenue in the city of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey. The site area includes the former L ERCO Company property which is located directly across East Chestnut Avenue from the fo rmer Kil

- Tone Company and numerous residential properties which surround both the L ERCO and former Kil -Tone Company property.

 **Site History:** FKT operated at the property from the late 1910s, manufacturing arsenic

- based pesticides until the late 1930s. Through mergers and acquisitions, the property became known as John Lucas & Company, Inc. and then Sherwin Williams Co. until it ceased operation s in the late 1930s. The property was purchased in 2008 by Urban Manufacturing LLC and the current operator Urban Sign and Crane (USC) manufactures commercial signs. Arsenic is not used by USC in their operations.  **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** The fo rmer FKT property, the L ERCO property and a number of residential properties have soil contaminated with arsenic and lead above health

- based benchmark concentrations.  **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  The contaminated soil extends throughout the FKT and L ERCO property and on a number of residential properties in the surrounding area. Arsenic and l ead levels at the site and on residential properties exceed the state residential and non- residential soil cleanup standard. These levels could pose a health hazard to more than 133 residents and workers in the contaminated area

.  **Response Activities (to date):** Various investigations have been conducted but there have not yet been any response activities.  **Need for NPL Listing:** Soil contaminated with arsenic and lead at commercial and residential properties requires cleanup to protect human health and the environment. NPL listing has been determined to be the most effective approach for cleanup. The EPA received a letter of suppo rt for placing this site to the NPL from the state

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.] For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxF AQs can be found on the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
#### § 583.206 Exempt transactions.

The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions that are exempt pursuant to section 203(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)).
# Azerbaijan

264 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 11, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		Urgent Need for Humanitarian Supplies into Nagorno-Karabakh	  September 10, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Azerbaijani President Aliyev	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 5, 2023	  Vedant PatelSeptember 5, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The Humanitarian Situation in Nagorno-Karabakh	  Matthew MillerAugust 31, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 16, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 16, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 15, 2023	  Vedant PatelAugust 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 9, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 9, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 7, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 1, 2023	  Matthew MillerAugust 1, 2023Washington, D.C. 

previous page1…56789…27next page

Back to Top
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

128 items

        -    		The United States Is Providing $30 Million to Build Healthy, Fertile Soils as Part of VACS	   
        -    Child Protection  		Honduran national convicted after cross-country trip against minor’s will	  August 24, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Investment Climate Statements: 	  July 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on A Strategy to Increase the Use of Local Organizations and Staff Section 7019(e) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2022 (Div. K, P.L.117-103) and House Report 117-84	  July 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Third Annual Transmission of the Section 353 Report to Congress	  Matthew MillerJuly 19, 2023 
        -    Report  		Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report: 2023	  July 18, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Press briefing with Todd D. Robinson, Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs	  Todd D.  RobinsonJuly 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe to Travel to Mexico City for Women in Science (WiSci) Girls STEAM Camp	  July 5, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Honduras	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Honduras	  May 15, 2023 

previous page1234…13next page

Back to Top
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0736. DAVIS v. THE STATE.

This appeal was docketed on December 22, 2015. On January 19, 2016, this

Court ordered appellant to file his brief and enumeration of errors within 10 days. 

As of the date of this order, appellant has failed to file the brief and

enumeration of errors. Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED. See Court of Appeals

Rules 13 and 23 (a).

TO THE DEFENDANT: Your appeal has been DISMISSED because your

attorney failed to file a brief and enumeration of errors. If you have decided you do

not want to appeal, you need not do anything more. However, if you still want to

appeal, you may have the right to an OUT-OF TIME APPEAL - but YOU MUST

TAKE ACTION to exercise that right bymoving for an out-of-time appeal in the trial

court. If your motion for an out-of-time appeal is granted, the trial court should

appoint another attorney for you if you want one and cannot pay for one. If your

motion for an out-of-time appeal is denied you may appeal that denial to this court

within thirty (30) days of the trial court’s decision.

February 12, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/12/2016
#### § 579.311 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Brian Bonar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: February 20, 2006

/s/ Brian Bonar
---------------
Brian Bonar
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       30
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 01, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0945. GEORGIA LAND DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC et al. v. CENTURY 

COMMUNITIES OF GEORGIA, LLC et al.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.