alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,878]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on June 2, 2009, by a company official on behalf of workers of Wachovia, Charlotte, North Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Accordingly, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of August 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-20455 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[110th Congress Public Law 308]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ308.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3009]]

Public Law 110-308
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
219 East Main Street in West Frankfort, Illinois, as the ``Kenneth James 
  Gray Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 12, 2008 -  [H.R. 6061]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KENNETH JAMES GRAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 219 East Main Street in West Frankfort, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kenneth James Gray Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kenneth 
James Gray Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6061:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            July 9, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 536.410 Charitable contributions.

Unless specifically authorized by OFAC pursuant to this part, no charitable contribution of funds, goods, services, or technology, except donations of articles, such as food, clothing, and medicine, intended to relieve human suffering, may be made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a specially designated narcotics trafficker. For the purposes of this part, a contribution is made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a specially designated narcotics trafficker if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, such a person; if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, an entity or individual acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled by, such a person; or if made in an attempt to violate, to evade, or to avoid the bar on the provision of contributions by, to, or for the benefit of such a person, or the receipt of contributions from such a person.

[86 FR 26665, May 17, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      7,333,531
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      9,816,259
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                30,141,100
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                   786,062,881
<ALLOWANCE>                                 4,901,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            867,386,958
<DEPOSITS>                                577,723,352
<SHORT-TERM>                               29,865,936
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        13,383,594
<LONG-TERM>                               178,594,360
<COMMON>                                   63,838,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,981,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            867,386,958
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            14,667,794
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             540,847
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              477,787
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           15,686,428
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          6,245,586
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9,180,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       6,505,664
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  97,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             4,066,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,322,767
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  4,322,767
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,869,767
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.14
<LOANS-NON>                                   782,701
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                20,357
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            4,820,834
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  31,179
<RECOVERIES>                                   14,623
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           4,901,778
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        2,181,470
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     2,720,308
        

</TABLE>
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4. 1

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-048-CV

SHERILYN MAGEE-FLICK, APPELLANT

INDIVIDUALLY, AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE,

AS HEIR TO AND ON BEHALF

OF ALL BENEFICIARIES TO 

THE ESTATE OF MABEL PHILLIPS 

V.

THI OF TEXAS AT LONGMEADOW, APPELLEE

LLC D/B/A LONGMEADOW 

HEALTHCARE CENTER

------------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Sherilyn Magee-Flick, Individually, as Personal Representative,

as Heir to and on Behalf of All Beneficiaries to The Estate of Mabel Phillips
2

appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory order compelling binding arbitration.

On February 11, 2008, we sent Appellant a letter stating our concern that we

may have no jurisdiction over this appeal because the order does not appear to

be a final appealable order or judgment, nor does it appear to be an appealable

interlocutory order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a) (Vernon

Supp. 2007) (listing appealable interlocutory orders), § 171.098(a)(1) (allowing

interlocutory appeals to be taken from orders denying an application to compel

arbitration); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)

(providing general rule that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment).

We indicated that this court would dismiss this appeal if we did not receive a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by February 21, 2008.

We received no response.

Accordingly, because the order is neither a final judgment nor an

appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: WALKER; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 13, 2008
HomeGhana

# Ghana

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

111 items

        -    DS Memorial  		Richard Nargetey Teinor	  April 18, 1986 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
#### § 586.403 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction.

Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized.
#### Hudson Mattress Manufacturing Company, complainant, *v.*Hingher Manufacturing Company et al., defendants.

[Decided February 14th, 1930.]

*Mr. Samuel S. Stern*and *Mr. Crawford*Jamieson, for the complainant.

*Mr. Herman*Anelcstein, for the defendants.

Buchanan, V. C.

Complainant, as a creditor of defendant to the extent of less than $200, filed hill to have defendant adjudged insolvent, and for an injunction and receiver under the sixty-fifth section of the Corporation act. P. *L. 1896 p. 277.*

At the hearing it appears that the defendant is insolvent; that sometime ago it made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors under the General Assignment act (P. *L. 1899 p.*lli-6); that it has not since been doing any business and does not intend to; that its affairs are being properly wound up by the assignees (who are also made defendants!; there is no proof of any necessity for an injunction or the appointment of a receiver, or that such a course would be of any benefit to the creditors or stockholders.

*608Complainant argues that notwithstanding the assignment for benefit of creditors, it is the duty of this court to issue injunction and appoint a receiver, citing *American Ice Machine Co.*v. *Paterson Steam, &c., Machine Co., 22 N. J. Eq. 72,*and the sixth-fourth section of the Corporation act which provides that any conveyance by a corporation while insolvent shall be void.

That statutory provision, however, was enacted in 1896. The Assignment act was passed in 1899, and hence, to the extent that, its provisions are inconsistent with the earlier act, it must be deemed to supersede such earlier act.

Section 24 of the Assignment act expressly provides that a corporation may make an assignment for the benefit of creditors under that act. It further provides that notwithstanding the making of such an assignment, this court *may*issue injunction, and appoint receivers superseding the assignees— but such action is not mandatory.

Neither is it mandatory on this court under the Corporation act, to issue injunction or appoint receiver, although the corporation is shown to be insolvent. *Rawnsley*v. *Trenton Mutual Life Insurance Co., 9 N. J. Eq. 95.*

Since it does not appear necessary or advisable for the safety of the public or the advantage of creditors or stockholders, the application for injunction will be denied.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 211.1 Withholding delivery of checks. ( a ) It is hereby determined that postal, transportation or banking facilities in general or local conditions in the Republic of Cuba and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) are such that there is not a reasonable assurance that a payee in those areas will actually receive checks or warrants drawn against funds of the United States, or agencies or instrumentalities thereof, and be able to negotiate the same for full value.
( b ) A check or warrant intended for delivery in any of the areas named in paragraph (a) of this section shall be withheld unless the check or warrant is specifically released by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( c ) Before a check or warrant drawn against funds blocked pursuant to the provisions of Executive Order No. 8389 (3 CFR, 1943 Cum. Supp.), as amended, and which remain blocked under the proviso clause of General License No. 101 of the Foreign Funds Control Regulations (31 CFR 520.101) may be released, it will be necessary for a license authorizing the release to be issued by the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, pursuant to E.O. 8389, as amended. In this regard, attention is also directed to the following regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury: ( 1 ) The Foreign Assets Control Regulations issued on December 17, 1950 (31 CFR part 500), pursuant to Executive Order 9193 (3 CFR, 1943 Cum. Supp.), which prohibit transactions involving payments to nationals of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Democratic Kampuchea, except to the extent that any such payments have been authorized by appropriate license,
( 2 ) The Cuban Assets Control Regulations issued on July 8, 1963 (31 CFR part 515), pursuant to the same authority, which prohibit similar transactions with nationals of Cuba unless licensed, and
( 3 ) The Iranian Assets Control Regulations issued on November 14, 1979 (31 CFR part 535), as amended on April 17, 1980, pursuant to Executive Orders 12170 and 12211, which prohibit transactions in property of the Iranian Government or its instrumentalities and transfers of funds to persons in Iran, except as authorized by appropriate license.
( d ) Powers of attorney for the receipt or collection of checks or warrants or for the proceeds of checks or warrants included within the determination of the Secretary of the Treasury set forth in paragraph (a) of this section will not be recognized.
[41 FR 15847, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 51568, Sept. 4, 1979; 45 FR 47678, July 16, 1980; 61 FR 41739, Aug. 12, 1996; 66 FR 63623, Dec. 10, 2001]
Annual Reports- Houston Federal Executive Board 2009 Annual Report    [164 KB]
- Houston Federal Executive Board 2008 Annual Report    [101 KB]
- Houston Federal Executive Board 2007 Annual Report    [99 KB]

FEB.govAccessibilityPrivacy PolicyUSA.gov

Office of Personnel Management
#### § 589.307 Debt.

The term *debt* as used in §§ 589.202 through 589.204 includes bonds, loans, extensions of credit, loan guarantees, letters of credit, drafts, bankers' acceptances, discount notes or bills, or commercial paper.
HomeAngola

# Angola

92 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Zambia/Local Integration of Former Refugees [Archive]	  April 15, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Angola (05-1006) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  October 6, 2005 

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
### UNITED STATES OFAMERICA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/AREPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. ANDRICHARD BERNARD Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations ofPublic Charter Rules 

### EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations ofPublic Charter Rules 

### Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel forAviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office inAscend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: February 28, 2014
Respectfully submitted,

~ Blane Workie Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh Q.Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 Ihereby certify that onthis 28th day ofFebruary, 2014, atrue and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was seryed inthe following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200.New Jersey Avenue, S.E
.. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder Chief Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle Boca Raton, Florida 33433
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 9:57 PM
To: Stenhouse, Jeb
Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: OMB/DOE mtgs on Monday

Hi Jeb,

That’s okay. I’ll get the attendance list updated in the morning. I’ll make sure to add Denise’s

name.

Regards, Corntey

From: Stenhouse, Jeb [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:51 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: OMB/DOE mtgs on Monday

Hi Cortney, sorry for the late update here but we tweaked our in-person staff attendance plans for Monday’s OMB/DOE RE and EE meetings, and as a result, some of the folks indicated on the listbelow will NOT be joining in person, but we would like to add Denise Mulholland’s name to the inperson attendee list if possible?

In case you’re wondering about the length of the list in terms of the number of EPA bodies in the room, it’s only looking that way because we’re planning to have a different set of support staff be in each meeting (so they’ll be a bit of a “changing of the guard” in between the two meetings). Bottom line, I’m expecting that you’ll have Kevin and myself in both meetings, plus 3 or 4 support staff focused on each topic in each meeting. Should be pretty much like how Friday’s meetings worked. Please let me know if you have any concerns!

JebFrom: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 5:12 PM
To: Stenhouse, Jeb
Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: OMB/DOE mtgs on Monday

Thank you, Jeb!

From: Stenhouse, Jeb [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:56 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Wayland, Robertj Subject: OMB/DOE mtgs on Monday

Hi Cortney,

For the OMB/DOE RE and EE meetings on Monday afternoon at the WHCC, here are the potential EPA in-person attendees at one or both of those meetings:

Jeb Stenhouse Kevin Culligan Mikhail Adamantiades Ryan Sims Beth Conlin Joe Bryson Jia Li Matt Clouse Niko Dietsch Chris Sherry
#### Mrs. Aline Solomon CLEMENTS et al. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 67813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re John Frenkel and Allstate Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 383 So.2d 1375.

Denied.
HomeBiographies...Richard C. Visek

# 				Richard C. Visek			

															Acting Legal Adviser						Office of the Legal Adviser												

				January 20, 2021 -									Present							

Richard C. Visek joined the Department of State’s Office of the Legal Adviser in 1999 and became a Deputy Legal Adviser in 2011 and the Principal Deputy Legal Adviser in 2016. He also serves as the Department’s Designated Agency Ethics Official. He previously served as the Assistant Legal Adviser for European and Eurasian Affairs and as the Assistant Legal Adviser for Employment Law. Prior to being promoted into the Senior Executive Service, he served in L offices advising on issues related to law enforcement and intelligence, appropriations, and legislation. Before joining the Office of the Legal Adviser, Mr. Visek worked at the U.S. Department of Justice and at the law firm of Hogan & Hartson in Washington, DC. He has taught courses in law at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC and at Tartu University in Estonia. Over the course of his career, Mr. Visek has received numerous awards, including two Distinguished and one Meritorious Presidential Rank Awards, the Secretary of State’s Distinguished Service Award, and the Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award. He received his BA from Stanford University, JD from Georgetown University, and LLM from Cambridge University.

Tags

Legal AdviserOffice of the Legal AdviserState Department Official

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- For Travelers
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- Leadership

HomeBureau of Consular Affairs...Contact Us – Bureau of Consular Affairs

# 									Contact Us – Bureau of Consular Affairs							

Bureau of Consular AffairsU.S. Department of State600 19th Street, NWWashington, DC 20036

If you have a question about a visa, passport, or assistance for U.S. citizens abroad, please visit this page.

Tags

Consular Assistance

Back to Top