alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1833V

UNPUBLISHED

KLAUDIA AUBUCHON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 27, 2020

Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment; 

Order Concluding Proceedings; 

Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss

Alan K. Nicollette, Nordstrom, Steele, Tustin, CA , for petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On February 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss pursuant to 

Vaccine Rule 21(a) in the above-captioned case. In support of this Motion, Petitioner 

states that a petition was previously filed on behalf of Petitioner by another counsel. 

The Vaccine Act states that “[o]nly one petition may be filed with respect to each 

administration of a vaccine.” 42 U.S.C. §300aa-11(b)(2). Thus, Petitioner’s motion is 

GRANTED. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a), the above-captioned case is 

hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that 

a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

.
exh_1037.htm


EXHIBIT 10.37


TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.


FISCAL 2013 COMPENSATION SUMMARIES












The Company's Board of Directors approved the following base salaries for certain of the Company’s executive officers for fiscal 2013.


 



	
FISCAL 2013 EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

	 
	
Executive Officer

	 	
Base Salary

	 
	
N. Roderick McGeachy, III


Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	$	360,000	*
	
Robert J. McCarten


Executive Vice President - Sales & Merchandising - Gifts

	 	$	260,000	*
	
Chuck Talley


Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Vice President

	 	$	 200,000	 





 


*  As previously reported, on August 28, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the payment of retention bonuses to each of Mr. McGeachy and Mr. McCarten in the amount of $75,000 and $50,000, respectively.  These retention bonuses are subject to a prorata clawback if the executive voluntarily terminates employment within 18 months of the payment of such bonus.












The Company's Board of Directors also previously approved the following compensation for non-employee directors for fiscal 2013.


 




	
FISCAL 2013 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


 


	
Annual Retainer:

	
Shares of Restricted Stock:***


	
Board Member - $43,000

	
Continuing Board Member – 3,000 shares


	 	 
	
Additional Annual Retainers:

	
New Board Member – 4,060 shares


	
Lead Independent Director - $10,000

	
Non-Employee Chairman of the Board – 4,200 shares


	
Audit Committee Chair – $7,500

	
One-Time Grant – 5,000 shares to each non-employee director


	
Compensation Committee Chair - $7,500

	  













***  Awards pursuant to the Company's 2002 Omnibus Plan.  Restricted stock awards, when combined with the one-time grant, were issued effective July 1, 2012.
HomeBiographies...Allison Peters

# 				Allison Peters			

															Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor												

				July 16, 2023 -									Present							

Ms. Peters serves as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor at the U.S. Department of State where she oversees the Bureau’s Office of Multilateral and Global Affairs, including its work on technology and human rights, and the Bureau’s Office of Policy Planning and Public Diplomacy. Previously, Ms. Peters served as the Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights and the Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs where she worked to advance rights-respecting approaches to technology and cyber policy and counter threats, including through the Summit for Democracy.

Prior to her time in government, Ms. Peters served as the Deputy Director of the National Security Program at the think tank Third Way where she regularly advised policymakers on a broad spectrum of foreign policy and national security issues. In this capacity, she helped to lead the Program’s Cyber Enforcement Initiative where her writing, research, and policy development focused on strengthening global cooperation and capacity to identify and bring to justice malicious cyber actors.

In addition, Ms. Peters previously served as the Director of Policy and Security Programs at the nongovernmental organization Inclusive Security where she advised and coordinated with policymakers on the development of policy frameworks to advance women, peace, and security, and regularly traveled to conflict-affected regions to implement field programs for security sector actors and women-led civil society organizations on issues related to countering violent extremism. She is a former Consultant Advisor to a number of international organizations, including the United Nations and Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe. Ms. Peters also spent seven years in the United States Senate, most recently serving as foreign policy and national security advisor to a senior senator and member of the Senate State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee.

Ms. Peters graduated with a master’s degree in international security studies from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service and a bachelor’s degree in political science and psychology from Rutgers University. She is a former member of several public-private partnerships and advisory boards, including the Steering Committee of the Leadership Council for Women in National Security. She is the recipient of a number of State Department performance awards.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborState Department Official

Back to Top
#### ALTMAN COOLING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FLORIDA HEAT & POWER, INC., a corporation, and Carl Lawson, Individually, Appellees.

No. 73-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1975.

Lloyd Herold, North Palm Beach, and Steven Carta of Smith, Seals & Carta, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Robert M. Sturrup of Faircloth, Sturrup & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee Florida Heat & Power, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the evidence contained in the record on appeal and upon consideration of the applica*226ble case law, we are of the opinion that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial. In order for appellant to have prevailed on his action based upon interference with a contractual relationship it was necessary for him to establish the existence of a valid contract. 45 Am.Jur.2d, Interference, sec. 1 et seq; Dade Enterprises v. Wometco Theatres, 119 Fla. 70, 160 So. 209 (1935); Annotation : 26 A.L.R.2d 1227 et seq. and supplement thereto; cf. Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 278. The evidence on this issue was conflicting and hence more suitably the subject of a jury determination. While we recognize and do by no means intend to stifle a trial court in the exercise of its discretion in granting a new trial where the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, such a determination although clothed with a strong presumption of correctness, must be weighed in the light of the disclosures of the record. North Dade Imported Motors v. Brundage Motors, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 170. In reviewing the record we find no support for the order granting a new trial. As pointed out in North Dade Motors v. Brundage Motors, supra:

> “It is an abuse of discretion to grant a new trial where the verdict finds ample support in the record, no illegal evidence is shown to have gone to the jury, and all that is to be accomplished is to have another jury try the cause.” (at 176)

See also Nunberg v. Brodsky, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 727. The jury heard the evidence and based thereon rendered its verdict and thereby fulfilled its function.

Accordingly, the order granting new trial is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with respectful directions to reinstate the verdict and enter judgment thereon.

Reversed.

WALDEN, J., and KIRKLAND, THOMAS E., Associate Judge, concur.

MAGER, J., dissents.

MAGER, Judge

(dissenting):

I would affirm the trial court’s decision granting a new trial based upon the rationale of Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669, and the findings contained in the trial court’s order.
#### § 578.314 Property; property interest.

The terms *property* and *property interest* include money, checks, drafts, bullion, bank deposits, savings accounts, debts, indebtedness, obligations, notes, guarantees, debentures, stocks, bonds, coupons, any other financial instruments, bankers acceptances, mortgages, pledges, liens or other rights in the nature of security, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, trust receipts, bills of sale, any other evidences of title, ownership, or indebtedness, letters of credit and any documents relating to any rights or obligations thereunder, powers of attorney, goods, wares, merchandise, chattels, stocks on hand, ships, goods on ships, real estate mortgages, deeds of trust, vendors' sales agreements, land contracts, leaseholds, ground rents, real estate and any other interest therein, options, negotiable instruments, trade acceptances, royalties, book accounts, accounts payable, judgments, patents, trademarks or copyrights, insurance policies, safe deposit boxes and their contents, annuities, pooling agreements, services of any nature whatsoever, contracts of any nature whatsoever, and any other property, real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible, or interest or interests therein, present, future, or contingent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEALTHWATCH, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,807,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,845
<INVENTORY>                                     62,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,348,697
<PP&E>                                         591,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                 582,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,835,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          992,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,378
<COMMON>                                       107,137
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,729,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,835,637
<SALES>                                        479,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,916
<CGS>                                          146,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,583,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               317,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,567,180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,567,180)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)


</TABLE>
HomeBiographies...Richard  Nargetey Teinor

# 				Richard  Nargetey Teinor 			

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 1986**

Corporal Richard Nargetey Teinor, Local Law Enforcement, was shot by protestors while protecting the U.S. Embassy in Accra, Ghana, on April 18, 1986.

**Photo: Guinea Police image**

Tags

Diplomatic SecurityDS MemorialGhana

Back to Top
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00543

- CR

ROLANDO ROMERO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 06

- CR

- 2992

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 19, 2013
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Anniversary of the Compact of Free Association with the Republic of the Marshall Islands

# 									Anniversary of the Compact of Free Association with the Republic of the Marshall Islands							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 20, 2021

Today we commemorate 35 years of the Compact of Free Association between the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the United States of America, which entered into force on October 21, 1986. The Compact has been a cornerstone of the strong relationship between the Marshall Islands and the United States for more than three decades.

We reaffirm the importance of our special and historic relationship, which will continue to support security, stability, freedom, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific for years to come. The Administration is prioritizing Compact negotiations with the Freely Associated States, and, through ongoing negotiations with the Marshall Islands, we seek to strengthen our enduring partnership.

The United States is proud to be a friend of the Marshall Islands, and we look forward to many more years of friendship.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsMarshall IslandsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 535.208 Evasions; effective date. ( a ) Any transaction for the purpose of, or which has the effect of, evading or avoiding any of the prohibitions set forth in this subpart is hereby prohibited.
( b ) The term *effective date* means, with respect to transactions prohibited in § 535.201, 8:10 a.m. eastern standard time, November 14, 1979, and with respect to the transactions prohibited in §§ 535.206 and 535.207, 4:19 p.m. eastern standard time, April 7, 1980.
( c ) With respect to any amendments of the foregoing sections or any other amendments to this part the term “effective date” shall mean the date of filing with the Federal Register.
[45 FR 24433, Apr. 9, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 26940, Apr. 21, 1980]
40606.

#### WALTON v. AMERICAN MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. A policy of insurance which provides, “No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months next after inception of the loss,” is not ambiguous because it elsewhere provides that “The amount of loss for which the company may be liable shall be payable sixty days after proof of loss . . .” or because the policy provides that the company shall not be liable under certain provisions of the policy for any loss “Until the actual repair or replacement is completed.” See *Maxwell Bros. v. Liverpool &c. Ins. Co.,*12 Ga. App. 127 (76 SE 1036); *Gibraltar Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Lanier,*64 Ga. App. 269 (13 SE2d 27).

*349Decided March 13, 1964.

*Albert A. Roberts,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. Ed Lane, Edward L. Saveli,*contra.

2. “It is well settled that a contractual provision in a policy of insurance that ‘no suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months next after inception of the loss’ is a valid contractual provision and is reasonable. *Melson v. Phenix Ins. Co.,*97 Ga. 722 (25 SE 189); *Brooks v. Georgia Home Ins. Co.,*99 Ga. 116 (24 SE 869); *Whiddon v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.,*61 Ga. App. 434 (6 SE2d 362); *Woodall v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,*33 Ga. App. 694 (128 SE 69); *Gibraltar Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Lanier,*64 Ga. App. 269 (13 SE2d 27); *Graham v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.,*106 Ga. 840 (32 SE 579); *Underwriters’ Agency v. Sutherlin,*55 Ga. 266; *Maxwell Brothers v. Liverpool &c. Ins. Co.,*12 Ga. App. 127 (76 SE 1036). And in the absence of facts to show a waiver by or estoppel against the insurer, the provision is binding upon the insured, and the insurer is entitled to rely upon it. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Caudle,*122 Ga. 608 (50 SE 337); *Gallivitoch v. Provident Life &c. Ins. Co.,*26 Ga. App. 385 (106 SE 319). Cf. *American Ins. Co. v. McVickers Bros.,*135 Ga. 118 (68 SE 1026), and *Underwriters’ Agency v. Sutherlin,*55 Ga. 266, supra.” *Aiken v. Northwestern Mut. Ins. Co.,*106 Ga. App. 220 (126 SE2d 630).

3. The plaintiff’s petition, as finally amended, alleged that the loss occurred in March, 1961 and the action was not filed until July 3, 1963 (more than a year after the loss), and there being no facts alleged to show a waiver by or estoppel against the insurer, of the limitation against suits more than twelve months after the loss the trial court properly sustained the defendant’s demurrer relying upon the policy provision shown in an exhibit attached to the plaintiff’s petition.

4. The rulings on the remaining grounds of demurrer are nugatory.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Russell, JJ., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 337.9 Payment of final interest.

Final interest on any debenture, whether purchased prior to or redeemed on or after the call or the maturity date, will be paid with the principal. In all cases the payment of principal and final interest will be mailed or directed to the payment address given in the form of advice accompanying the debenture surrendered.
#### § 589.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 302]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ302.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3003]]

Public Law 110-302
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
Wenatchee, Washington, as the Elwood ``Bud'' Link Department of Veterans 
   Affairs Outpatient Clinic. <<NOTE: Aug. 12, 2008 -  [H.R. 2245]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ELWOOD ``BUD'' LINK DEPARTMENT OF 
                              VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 
clinic located in Wenatchee, Washington, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Elwood `Bud' Link 
Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Elwood ``Bud'' Link Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

    Approved August 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2245:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            June 24, 26, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
HomeForeign Service National...Cesar Bathiard

# 									Cesar Bathiard							

DS Memorial

April 18, 1983

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Foreign Service National****Year of Death: 1983**Cesar Bathiard, Foreign Service National, died on April 18, 1983,in Beirut, Lebanon. He was killed during a terrorist bombing ofU.S. Embassy Beirut.

**Photo: U.S. Government**

 

Tags

DS Foreign Service NationalLebanon

Back to Top
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofSeptember 1, 2017 by and among Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp. as Depositor, KeyBank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Certificate Administrator and as Trustee relating toCSAIL 2017-CX9 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2017-CX9 **(CSAIL 2017-CX9)**

 

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of September 29, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”)in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted undermy supervision.

 

3.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been afailure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failureand the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                                Date: March1, 2018

     Adam Singer, Managing Director
#### § 589.305 Covered Executive order.

The term *covered Executive order* means any of the following: Executive Order (E.O.) 13660, E.O. 13661, E.O. 13662, E.O. 13685, E.O. 13694, relating to the Russian Federation, or E.O. 13757, relating to the Russian Federation.