alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40628.

#### GLASS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted under an accusation charging her with pointing a gun at another. Before pleading, the defendant filed a challenge to the array of the traverse jury based upon the ground that the systematic, arbitrary and deliberate exclusion of members of the Negro race from serving as jurors in such court was a violation of the defendant’s rights “as provided for under the equal protection clause and due process clause” of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. After hearing evidence the trial court overruled the challenge to the array and proceeded with the trial of the main case which resulted in the conviction of the defendant. Thereafter, the defendant’s amended motion for new trial was overruled and by writ of error the adverse judgments were appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was transferred to this court when the Supreme Court determined that the case involved “The application of unquestioned and unambiguous provisions of the Constitution to a given state of facts.” *Glass v. State,*219 Ga. 565 (134 SE2d 813).

The solicitor of the trial court testified on cross examination that he had not seen a Negro serve on the juries in such court over a period of twelve years, and the clerk testified on cross examination that names of prospective Negro jurors on the jury list cany a designation of their racial identity. *Held:*

Under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Avery v. Georgia, 345 U. S. 559 (73 SC 891, 97 LE 1244), the defendant made out a prima facie case of racial discrimination and the burden was upon the State to overcome such *354prima facie case. No evidence was introduced by the State and the trial court erred in overruling the challenge to the array. The further proceedings were nugatory.

Decided March 13, 1964.

C. *B. King,*for plaintiff in error.

*Marcus B. Calhoun, Solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Hall and Russell, JJ., concur.*
#### The Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellants, *against*Morris Heft, Respondent.

(Decided June 26th, 1885).

The Common Council of the City of New York having" no power to permit any encroachment on the streets of that city except the temporary occupation of such part of a street as may be adjacent to a lot on which a building is in course of construction, an ordinance providing that no one shall be sued for placing an incumbrance upon the street, unless he persists in maintaining it for ten days after he has notice to remove it, is invalid.

• Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the City of New York for the Eighth Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Per Curiam (Present, Van Hoesen and Allen, JJ.)

It is true that this ordinance does not deprive the Department of Public Works of its power to remove encroachments, but it does attempt to take away the right to punish the person who creates the incumbrance, for it provides that no one shall be sued for placing an incumbrance on a street unless he persists in maintaining it for a certain period after he has had notice to remove it. The ordinance in effect gives to any person the right to maintain an incumbrance for any period less than ten days, for it declares that unless he maintains it for ten days after having been notified to remove it, he shall not be liable to an action.

He may maintain an encroachment on the street for nine days or nine days and a half without being liable to any action whatever, if this ordinance be valid. This cannot be. The Common Council is forbidden to permit any encroachment except the temporary occupation of such part of a street as may be adjacent to a lot on which a building is in course of construction. It is true that the ordinance does *302not expressly declare that encroachments are authorized, hut it does forbid prosecution of those who are guilty of encroaching. It is a familiar saying, that there can be no law without a sanction. Where a right exists there must be a way of protecting it. and of punishing those who violate it. When you take away the means of enforcing the right, you- destroy the 'very right itself. When the Common Council, therefore, ordained that a man might keep up an encroachment for any period less than ten days without being liable to an action, it virtually gave to all persons the liberty to encroach at their pleasure on the streets for less than ten days at a time.

It is argued that Justice Gedney intended to decide that the defendant did not in fact ever encroach on the street, and there are parts of the record that give color to that argumént, but other parts of the record seem to show that he meant to decide that the ordinance was valid. We think it better, therefore, to reverse the judgment, and to order a new trial, without costs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.
§ 597.505 Payment for certain legal services. Except as otherwise authorized, specific licenses may be issued, on a case-by-case basis, authorizing receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses through a U.S. financial institution for the following legal services by U.S. persons: ( a ) Provision of legal advice and counseling to a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling is not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of any of the prohibitions of this part;
( b ) Representation of a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof when named as a defendant in or otherwise made a party to domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings;
( c ) Initiation and conduct of domestic U.S. legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings on behalf of a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof;
( d ) Representation of a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof before any federal or state agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof;
( e ) Representation of an agent of a foreign terrorist organization, wherever located, detained within the jurisdiction of the United States or by the United States government, with respect to either such detention or any charges made against such agent, including, but not limited to, the conduct of military commission prosecutions and the initiation and conduct of federal court proceedings;
( f ) Provision of legal services to a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense; and
( g ) Representation of a foreign terrorist organization seeking judicial review of a designation before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1189(b)(1).
Note to § 597.505 :
*See* § 597.513 of this part for authorized mechanisms for payment through a U.S. financial institution of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for legal services specified in this section provided by a U.S. person to or on behalf of a foreign terrorist organization or an agent thereof.
[62 FR 52495, Oct. 8, 1997, as amended at 73 FR 78633, Dec. 23, 2008; 75 FR 75909, Dec. 7, 2010]
# Burma

247 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 24, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 24, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 23, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 23, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Burma	  February 23, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability for Those Responsible for Violence Against Protestors in Burma	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 22, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 22, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 22, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 19, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 19, 2021Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 16, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 16, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Officials and Entities in Connection with the Military Coup in Burma	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 11, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 10, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 10, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 9, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 

previous page1…1920212223…25next page

Back to Top
40652.

#### WILLIAMS v. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where there was evidence that the claimant’s deceased husband was injured some 10 or 12 miles from the area in which he was supposed to have been working at that time, while en route to his father’s house for the purpose of delivering a personal purchase made from his employer, defendant Williams Brothers Lumber Company, in the defendant company’s truck, the use of which was without the knowledge or permission required by the employer, the finding of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and the award denying compensation to the claimant were authorized by the evidence; therefore the court did not err in affirming the board's award.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

*696Decided May 8, 1964.

*Richard. W. Best, Best, Chambers & Mabry,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith, Ringel, Martin, Ansley & Carr, Charles L. Drew,*contra.
**Exhibit 12.1**
**Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                                               **Three Months**                      **Ended**  **1999** **2000** **2001** **2002** **2003** **Mar. 31, 2004**          **(in thousands)**        **Earnings**                        Income From Continuing Operations *  72,856   65,951   92,533   105,882   108,906   34,782 Fixed Charges  34,305   55,621   72,217   77,726   99,212   22,415 Distributed Income ofEquity Investment  —   —   40,800   30,938   27,733   6,000 Capitalized Interest  (2,133)  (4,559)  (4,000)  (4,345)  (5,290)  (864)                         Total Earnings  105,028   117,013   201,550   210,201   230,561   62,333                          **Fixed Charges**                        Interest Expense  31,563   48,982   66,057   70,537   89,540   20,459 Capitalized Interest  2,133   4,559   4,000   4,345   5,290   864 Rental Interest Factor  609   2,080   2,160   2,844   4,382   1,092                          Total Fixed Charges  34,305   55,621   72,217   77,726   99,212   22,415                          **Ratio: Earnings / Fixed Charges**  3.06   2.10   2.79   2.70   2.32   2.78                          
* Excludes minority interest, extraordinary loss, gain on sale of assets and undistributed equity earnings.
- Office Home
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Counterproliferation Initiatives

# Office of Counterproliferation Initiatives

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Counterproliferation Initiatives leads efforts to develop, implement, and improve counterproliferation policies, which are designed to impede the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It works closely with the White House and other agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Treasury, Commerce, Homeland Security, and Justice, and with the intelligence community, to develop and implement appropriate diplomatic, defense, law enforcement, and rapid response options, and other international measures designed to combat the proliferation of WMD.				

Back to Top
- Office Home
- About Us
- Resources
- Protocol Reference
- Contact Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...Office of the Chief of Protocol

# Office of the Chief of Protocol

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of the Chief of Protocol seeks to advance the foreign policy goals of the United States by creating an environment for successful diplomacy. Our team extends the first hand that welcomes presidents, prime ministers, ruling monarchs, and other leaders to our country. By serving on the front lines of diplomatic engagement, we promote cross-cultural exchange and build new bridges of understanding between people and governments around the world.				

Senior Official

Ethan Rosenzweig

							Follow Us:																			TwitterFlickrInstagram

## 							Key Topics						

        -  											Protocol Reference										 
        -  											Resources for Foreign Embassies										 
        -  											Divisions										 
        -  											Order of Precedence										 

### 											Protocol Reference											

Find details on protocol for hosting events and answers to some of the most frequently asked protocol questions. 
													Learn More About Protocol for Hosting Events													Protocol Reference

### 											Resources for Foreign Embassies											

Resources include the Order of Precedence, Deans of the Diplomatic Corps, airport escort screening courtesies, port courtesies, information for domestic workers, and the diplomatic list. 
													Learn More About the Foreign Diplomatic Order of Precedence													Resources for Foreign Embassies

### 											Divisions											

We invite you to learn more about the Office of the Chief of Protocol by exploring the work of our divisions and units. 
													Learn More About the Office of the Chief of Protocol													Divisions

### 											Order of Precedence											

The United States Order of Precedence is an advisory document maintained by the Ceremonials Division. For purposes of protocol, the U.S. Order of Precedence establishes the order and ranking of U.S. leadership for official events at home and abroad. 
													Learn More About the United States Order of Precedence													Order of Precedence

## Divisions

            -  Blair House Division 
            -  Ceremonials Division 
            -  Diplomatic Affairs Division 
            -  Diplomatic Partnerships Division 
            -  Major Events Division 
            -  Management Division 
            -  Visits Division 

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Portfolio
- Careers
- Industry Advisory Group
- Events
- Releases
- Build with Us
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations...Contact Us – Overseas Buildings Operations

# 									Contact Us							

Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

## Stay Connected

 

----

## Address

U.S. Department of StateOverseas Buildings Operations, SA-61701 Fort Myer DriveArlington, VA 22209

 

----

#### Follow us on social media: #StateOBO

 

Back to Top
#### §§ 560.602-560.603 [Reserved]
#### § 566.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, reference to any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, directive, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- The Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports
- Contact Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Political Affairs...Bureau of Counterterrorism

# Bureau of Counterterrorism

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Bureau of Counterterrorism's mission is to promote U.S. national security by taking a leading role in developing coordinated strategies and approaches to defeat terrorism abroad and securing the counterterrorism cooperation of international partners.				

							Follow Us:																			Twitter

## 											The Latest									

					March 21, 2024				

## The Islamic State Five Years Later: Persistent Threats, U.S. Options

On March 23, 2019, almost exactly five years ago, the Coalition and its local partners liberated the final stretch of territory controlled by ISIS in Baghuz, Syria. This was and remains a milestone in our continued efforts to ensure ISIS cannot resurge.

          -  March 23, 2024							Terrorist Attack in Moscow						   
          -  March 7, 2024							Joint Statement of the 20th U.S.- India Counterterrorism Joint Working Group 						   
          -  March 5, 2024							Intervention at the D-ISIS Coalition FTF Working Group						   
See All

## 							Policy Issues						

        -  											Country Reports on Terrorism										 
        -  											Terrorist Designations										 
        -  											Programs and Initiatives										 

### 											Country Reports on Terrorism											

U.S. law requires the Secretary of State to provide Congress, by April 30 of each year, a full and complete report on terrorism with regard to those countries and groups meeting criteria set forth in the legislation. This annual report is entitled Country Reports on Terrorism. Beginning with the report for 2004, it replaced the previously published Patterns of Global Terrorism.
													Learn More About Country Reports on Terrorism													Country Reports on Terrorism

### 											Terrorist Designations											

Current lists of Foreign Terrorist Organizations and State Sponsors of Terrorism.
													Learn More About State Sponsors of Terrorism and Terrorist Designations													Terrorist Designations

### 											Programs and Initiatives											

Learn about the Bureau of Counterterrorism’s various programs to build foreign partner capacity and counter terrorism around the world.
													Learn More About the Bureau of Counterterrorism													Programs and Initiatives

## Offices

            -  The Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS 

Back to Top
§ 566.309 Foreign financial institution. ( a ) The term *foreign financial institution* means: ( 1 ) A foreign bank;
( 2 ) Any branch or office located outside the United States of a covered financial institution, as defined in § 566.303;
( 3 ) Any other person organized under foreign law (other than a branch or office of such person in the United States) that, if it were located in the United States, would be a covered financial institution, as defined in § 566.303; and
( 4 ) Any person organized under foreign law (other than a branch or office of such person in the United States) that is engaged in the business of, and is readily identifiable as, a dealer in foreign exchange or a money transmitter.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a)(4) of this section, a person is not “engaged in the business” of a dealer in foreign exchange or a money transmitter if such transactions are merely incidental to the person's business.
[81 FR 22186, Apr. 15, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 35310, July 23, 2019]
#### § 560.527 Rescheduling existing loans.

Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis for rescheduling loans or otherwise extending the maturities of existing loans, and for charging fees or interest at commercially reasonable rates, in connection therewith, provided that no new funds or credits are thereby transferred or extended to Iran or the Government of Iran, an Iranian financial institution, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 354.2 Law governing rights and obligations of Federal Reserve Banks, and Sallie Mae; rights of any Person against Federal Reserve Banks and Sallie Mae. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the following are governed solely by the book-entry regulations contained in this part 354, the Securities Documentation (to the extent not inconsistent with these regulations) and Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars: ( 1 ) The rights and obligations of Sallie Mae and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Sallie Mae Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of the Book-entry System as it applies to Sallie Mae Securities; and
( 2 ) The rights of any Person, including a Participant, against Sallie Mae and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Sallie Mae Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of the Book-entry System as it applies to Sallie Mae Securities.
( b ) A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Participant and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 354.4(c)(1), is governed by the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of the jurisdiction where the head office of the Federal Reserve Bank maintaining the Participant's Securities Account is located. A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Person that is not a Participant, and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 354.14(c)(1), is governed by the law determined in the manner specified in § 354.3.
( c ) If the jurisdiction specified in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of this section is a State that has not adopted Revised Article 8 (incorporated by reference, see § 354.1), then the law specified in paragraph (b) shall be the law of that State as though Revised Article 8 had been adopted by that State.
HomeCook Islands

# Cook Islands

12 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown	  March 15, 2024 
        -    		Cook Islands	  October 2, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and Dr. Mira Rapp-Hooper, Special Assistant to the President and NSC Senior Director for East Asia and Oceania	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkSeptember 29, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Joint Statement Signing Ceremony  with Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 25, 2023Treaty RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		On the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the United States and the Cook Islands	  September 25, 2023 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry to Deliver Remarks at Special Meeting on Climate and Ocean Resilience as part of the U.S.-Pacific Islands Forum Summit	  September 24, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Dialogue in Papua New Guinea	  May 22, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Cook Islands Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Hermann	  September 14, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL – Promoting Investigative Journalism and Anti-Corruption Efforts in Pacific Island Countries	  February 16, 2021 

12next page

Back to Top
§ 576.406 Provision of services. ( a ) Except as provided in § 576.209, the prohibitions on transactions involving blocked property contained in § 576.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, including by an overseas branch of an entity located in the United States: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 576.201(a); or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests subject to § 576.201.
( b )
Example: U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 576.201(a).
Note to § 576.406 :
*See* §§ 576.507 and 576.509 on licensing policy with regard to the provision of certain legal and medical services.