alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francisco Javier BOJORQUEZ-OJEDA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 99-70424.

I & NS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Deferred Nov. 14, 2000.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 31, 2001.

Decided Feb. 12, 2001.

Before PREGERSON, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is hereby resubmitted effec^ve January 31, 2001.

*351MEMORANDUM1

Francisco Javier Bojorquez-Ojeda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of the immigration judge’s order finding him removable as charged. The IJ determined that Bojorquez-Ojeda was removable pursuant to INA § 212(a)(2)(C), because the INS proved by clear and convincing evidence that he engaged in drug trafficking.2 During removal proceedings, Bojorquez-Ojeda conceded that he was removable on this ground.

INA § 242(a)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) provides: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in section 212(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)] ....” We have jurisdiction to determine whether we have jurisdiction. *Flores-Miramontes v. INS,*212 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir.2000). Because we conclude that we do not, we dismiss the petition for review.

PETITION DISMISSED.

1

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

2

. INA § 212(a)(2)(C) provides that "Any alien who the consular or immigration officer knows or has reason to believe is or has been an illicit trafficker in any such controlled substances ... is inadmissible.”
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2547

To designate the United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street

in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1995

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 800

Market Street in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard

H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 800 Market

5 Street in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States

7 Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 2547 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A Along
      Mobile Technologies, Inc.., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
      certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005 (the
      "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A Along Mobile Technologies,
      Inc. and will be retained by International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A
      Along Mobile Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      April 28, 2006







/z/
      Jian Wei Li


Jian
      Wei
      Li


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer







/z/
      Zhen Wan


Zhen
      Wan


Chief
      Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DALE MATHEW CHAPEL,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00319-CR

Appeal from the

 41st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#20060D05747) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Dale Chapel appeals his conviction of the offense of solicitation to commit aggravated

sexual assault of a child. Finding that Appellant has not complied with Rule 25.2 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss the appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant’s right to appeal in a criminal case and requires

that the trial court enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which it

enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2. Likewise, Rule 25.2(d)

requires that the trial court certify whether the defendant has a right of appeal under Rule

25.2(a)(2). TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(d). An appellate court is required to dismiss an appeal if a

certification shows the defendant’s right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See id.

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal but the notice did not include the trial court’s

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal as required. The clerk’s office notified Appellant

that a certification had not been included and requested that Appellant file the certification within

thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not complied with our request. 
-2-

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

January 30, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: Lion Copolymer Holdings, LLC , Appellants/Cross

- Appellee v. Lion Polymers, LLC , Appellee/Cross

- Appellant , and AFWest Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia, Appellees Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00848

- CV Trial court case number: 2014

- 10394 Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County Appellant/Cross

- Appellee Lion Copolymer Holdings, LLC (“Company”), Appellee/Cross

Appellant Lion Polymers, LLC (“Lion Polymers”) and Appellees AFWest Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia have filed an “Agreed Motion to Amend Current Briefing Schedule and to Exceed Word Count.” The motion is granted . The briefing schedule and word counts are amended as follows:
 The Company’s opening ap pellant’s brief is due on January 20, 2017
.  Lion Polymers’ combined appellee’s and cross

- appellant’s brief is due on February 20, 2017 (30 days after the Company files its appellant’s brief )
. The combined brief shall contain no more than 30,000 words.
 The Company’s combined cross

- appellee’s and reply brief is due on March 22, 2017 (30 days after Lion Polymers files its appellee’s and cross

- appellant’s brief ) . The combined brief shall contain no more than 22,500 words
.  The brief of appellees AFWest Chemi cals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia is due on March 22, 2017 (30 days after Lion Polymers files its cross

- appellant’s brief )
.  Lion Polymers’ reply brief will be due on April 11, 2017 (20 days after the cross

appellee’s brief is filed by the Company and the appell ees’ brief is filed by AFWest Chemicals, Ltd. and Vijay Goradia). It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:

_

/s/ Rebeca Huddle

_ Acting individually Date: December 8, 2016
#### § 562.306 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2743 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2743

  To establish a source of funding for certain border infrastructure 
  projects necessary to accommodate increased traffic resulting from 
  implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 1995

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish a source of funding for certain border infrastructure 
  projects necessary to accommodate increased traffic resulting from 
  implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Border Infrastructure Improvements 
Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation may make grants to 
States, cities, and counties for highway, railroad, bridge, and border 
crossing construction projects--
            (1) that are located in the United States in the vicinity 
        of the border between the United States and Mexico and the 
        border between the United States and Canada; and
            (2) that are necessary to accommodate increased traffic 
        resulting from implementation of the North American Free Trade 
        Agreement.
    (b) Selection Criteria.--The Secretary shall select projects for 
grant assistance under this section on the basis of the demonstrated 
need for assistance to accommodate increased traffic resulting from 
implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of projects for 
which grants are made under this section shall be 80 percent.

SEC. 3. GRANTS AS CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.

    A grant approved by the Secretary under this section shall be a 
contractual obligation of the United States to pay the Federal share of 
the cost of the project.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act for 
each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1996, $400,000,000 from 
the Highway Trust Fund (other than Mass Transit Account). Such sums 
shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by this section 
shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2017, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-P7 (the Agreement). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this
Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |  |  |     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |  |  | LOGO
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 263 ) ll-K - (I ) -7 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM Sheet 263 of 325P. 2 

# /AVjg j II-K-(I)-7 6

198 2 ANNUA L ENERG YOUTLOO KWIT H PROJECTION S T O 199 0 DOE/Energ y

Informatio n Administratio n 198 2 THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I;)-7 *
LARANCE SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4391

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Larance Scott, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2513

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial benefits

to include certain veterans who die in State nursing homes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1995

Mr. STUMP (for himself, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. EVERETT, and Mr. EVANS)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility

for burial benefits to include certain veterans who die

in State nursing homes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF BURIAL BENEFITS.

4 Section 2303(a) of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(a)(1) When a veteran dies in a facility described

7 in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall—

8 ‘‘(A) pay the actual cost (not to exceed $300)

9 of the burial and funeral or, within such limits, may
2

•HR 2513 IH

1 make contracts for such services without regard to

2 the laws requiring advertisement for proposals for

3 supplies and services for the Department; and

4 ‘‘(B) when such a death occurs in a State,

5 transport the body to the place of burial in the same

6 or any other State.

7 ‘‘(2) A facility described in this paragraph is—

8 ‘‘(A) a Department facility (as defined in sec9 tion 1701(4) of this title) to which the deceased was

10 properly admitted for hospital, nursing home, or

11 domiciliary care under section 1710 or 1711(a) of

12 this title; or

13 ‘‘(B) an institution at which the deceased vet14 eran was, at the time of death, receiving—

15 ‘‘(i) hospital care in accordance with sec16 tion 1703 of this title;

17 ‘‘(ii) nursing home care under section 1720

18 of this title; or

19 ‘‘(iii) nursing home care pursuant to pay20 ments made under section 1741 of this title.’’.

Æ
#### EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN and Presto Manufacturing Company v. Isiah JOHNSON.

No. 50780.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 29, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1979.

McCoy & Wilkins, Joseph L. McCoy, Jackson, for appellant.

*James A. Phyfer, Jackson, for appellee.*

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Affirmed.
1 

### Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:29 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Cc: Naess, Liz; Rosendahl, Tom; Gabrilovich, Lev

Subject: June 19, 2013 Exceptional Events Meeti ng with Dana Wood, BP - For Docket

On June 19, 2013, EPA representatives met with Dana Wood, Senior Environmental Technical Advisor with BP America

Production Company, to discuss her/BP comments submitted in response to the July 6, 2012 Federal Register Notice of

Availability on the “Draft Guidance to Implement Requirements for the Treatment of Air Quality Monitoring Data

Influenced by Exceptional Events.” Dana/BP’s comments are available in the Exceptional Events docket at EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐

2011

‐ 0887

‐ 0033.

The following were present for the meeting:

 Dana Wood, Senior Environmental Technical Advisor with BP America Production Company

 Beth Palma, USEPA

 Liz Naess, USEPA

 Tom Rosendahl, USEPA

 Lev Gabrilovich, Summer 2013 Legal Intern to USEPA

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539

‐ 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov

919.541.5432
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      3,866,176
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     11,139,276
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                56,575,779
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                   728,350,275
<ALLOWANCE>                                 4,566,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            834,252,455
<DEPOSITS>                                559,645,280
<SHORT-TERM>                               73,472,527
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        14,423,378
<LONG-TERM>                               123,071,811
<COMMON>                                   41,471,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 22,168,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            834,252,455
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            13,902,372
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             966,847
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              301,501
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           15,170,720
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          6,036,114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          8,955,376
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       6,215,344
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             19,659
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             3,945,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,373,604
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  3,373,604
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,307,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.02
<LOANS-NON>                                   511,294
<LOANS-PAST>                                   23,894
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               942,924
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            4,563,594
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  94,779
<RECOVERIES>                                    7,660
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           4,566,475
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        4,193,928
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       372,547
        

</TABLE>
§ 569.307 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 569.307 :
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
Presidential Documents

43025 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 164 

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8401 of August 21, 2009 

Fiftieth Anniversary of Hawaii Statehood 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

It is with great pride that our Nation commemorates the fiftieth anniversary 

of Statehood for Hawaii. On August 21, 1959, we welcomed Hawaii into 

the United States ohana, or family. Unified under the rule of King Kamehameha the Great, it was Queen Lili‘uokalani who witnessed the transition 

to a Provisional Government controlled by the United States. As a Nation, 

we honor the extensive and rich contributions of Native Hawaiian culture 

to our national character. 

Borne out of volcanic activity in the Pacific Ocean, a chain of islands 

emerged that would bear witness to some of the most extraordinary events 

in world history. From Pu‘ukohola Heiau and the royal residence at the 

‘Iolani Palace, to the USS ARIZONA Memorial and luaus that pay tribute 

to Hawaiian traditions, Americans honor the islands’ collective legacy and 

admire their natural beauty. Home to unique and endangered species, active 

volcanoes, and abundant reefs, the Hawaiian islands actively conserve their 

distinctive ecosystems with responsible development and a deep-rooted appreciation for the land and surrounding ocean. 

The Aloha Spirit of Hawaii offers hope and opportunity for all Americans. 

Growing up in Hawaii, I learned from its diversity how different cultures 

blend together into one population—proud of their personal heritage and 

made stronger by their shared sense of community. Our youngest State, 

Hawaii faces many of the same challenges other States face throughout 

our country, and it represents the opportunity we all have to grow and 

learn from each other. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by the virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 21, 2009, as 

the Fiftieth Anniversary of Hawaii Statehood. I call upon the people of 

the United States to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, 

and activities. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCD0

43026 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 26, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfourth. 

[FR Doc. E9–20694 

Filed 8–25–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCD0OB#1.EPS</GPH>