alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Linda J. Miles, certify that:  1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b. [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.*/s/*LINDA J. MILESLinda J. Miles
EXHIBIT 32.2 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant


to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002














I, Jon S. Verbeck, Chief Financial Officer,  Acting Principal Accounting Officer, and Treasurer of OP-TECH Environmental Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 11, 2010




/s/ Jon S. Verbeck


Jon S. Verbeck


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,


Acting Principal Accounting Officer
§ 552.302 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part, and, with respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, is the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
#### § 800.223 Foreign national.

The term *foreign national* means any individual other than a U.S. national.
CREGON COAST
UNITED STATES: BATHYMETRIC MAP HECETA ESCARPMENT

secrets wer HECETA ESCARPMENT
IE AND ATMOSPERC aDaePutSTHATON (N440125W)
NATOMAL OOFAN SERVICE ad

1990

BATHYMETRIC MAP LMI31

BATINWESEE CONTOCA THAVAS. fO WKTERE TO mtntanune tere

WATUnd MEANY LOrWH (SW Wane
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 28, 2017 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of May, 2019.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
No. 16,881.

#### Louisville, Evansville and St. Louis Consolidated Railroad Company *v.*West, Treasurer, et al.

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

*J. E. Iglehart*and *E. Taylor,*for appellant.

*A. G. Smith,*Attorney-General, *M, W. Eunk, W. D. Robinson, W. M. Land, J. B. Gamble, H. Kramer, L. B. Osborn, E. BeBruler, W. W. Ereand, J. T. Beasley*and *A. B. Williams,*for appellees.

Hackney, C. J.

This suit was by the appellant against the appellees, James A. West, treasurer of Gibson county; James F. Saunders, treasurer of Vanderburg county; J. F. Masters, treasurer of Warrick coanty; J. T. McKenney, treasurer of Spencer county; J. Burger, treasurer of Dubois county; O.O. Smith, treasurer of Pike county; Michael Eberhard, treasurer of Perry county; F. P. Walz, treasurer of Crawford county; Patrick Griffin, treasurer of Harrison county; Levi H. Scott, treasurer of Floyd county; J. A. Jones, marshal of the city of Eockport, Spencer county; Jacob H. Atkins, treasurer of the town of Bird’s Eye, Dubois county; Charles Tillery, treasurer of the town of English, Crawford county; D. Vanderpool, treasurer of the city of Cannelton, Perry county; Jacob Best, treasurer of the city of New Albany, Floyd county; Arnold H. Miller, treasurer of the city of ITuntingburg, Dubois county; August Mernenger, treasurer of the city of Tell City, Perry county; and John McDonough, treasurer of the city of Evansville, Vanderburg county.

The complaint was to enjoin the enforcement of certain taxes assessed upon valuations of appellant’s railroad and rolling stock, made by the State Board of Tax Commissioners pursuant to the act of March 6, 1891, Acts 1891, p. 199; E. S. 1894, section 8408 *et seq.*

The lower court sustained the demurrer of the appellees to the complaint, and that ruling is the only assigned error.

The questions presented in this case are as to the powers, duties and privileges of said board, and as to the constitutionality of said *696act, and are identical with those considered and decided in *Cleveland, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 513; *Indianapolis, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 609; *Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co.*v. *Backus, Treas.,*133 Ind. 625; and, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States on day of May, 1894.

Filed June 20, 1894.

Upon the authority of the cases cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, and the restraining order, heretofore issued by this court herein, is dissolved.
#### Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson, New Jersey, appellant, *v.*Louise Bamford, executrix, &c., et al., respondents.

[Decided October 14th, 1929.]

*Messrs. Humphreys <& Sumner,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Merritt Lane*and *Mr. Robert J. McDermott,*for the respondents.

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in *102 N. J. Eq. 454.*

*For affirmance*— The Chiep-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, Lloyb, Case, Bobine, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetpielb, Deae, JJ. 15.

*For reversal*— None.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      24,425,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,343,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                   235,278
<INVENTORY>                                  4,376,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,283,128
<PP&E>                                      20,150,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,182,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,813,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,854,433
<BONDS>                                      1,154,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       388,255
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,925,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,813,482
<SALES>                                     49,134,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,134,074
<CGS>                                       27,494,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,332,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               344,110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                344,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,263,415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,816,184
<DISCONTINUED>                               5,543,610
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              5,886,822
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (343,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-060-CV

IN RE BRUCE GARRETT	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.  The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2005
§ 549.304 Information or informational materials. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term *information* or *informational materials* includes, but is not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds. Note to paragraph ( a
) of § 549.304 :
To be considered information or informational materials, artworks must be classified under chapter heading 9701, 9702, or 9703 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( b ) The term *information* or *informational materials,* with respect to United States exports, does not include items: ( 1 ) That were, as of April 30, 1994, or that thereafter become, controlled for export pursuant to section 5 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2401-2420 (1979) (the “EAA”), or section 6 of the EAA to the extent that such controls promote the nonproliferation or antiterrorism policies of the United States; or
( 2 ) With respect to which acts are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 37.
#### § 800.210 Covered control transaction.

The term *covered control transaction* means any transaction that is proposed or pending after August 23, 1988, by or with any foreign person that could result in foreign control of any U.S. business, including such a transaction carried out through a joint venture.
#### Buck ISHEE v. DUKES FORD COMPANY.

No. 51693.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 27, 1980.

Aultman & Aultman, Dorrance Aultman, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Tullos, Tullos & Tullos, Eugene C. Tullos, Raleigh, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

PATTERSON, Chief Justice,

for the Court:

In the Circuit Court of Smith County, Dukes Ford Company obtained a $5250 default judgment following a hearing upon a writ of inquiry granted to determine the compensable loss caused when Buck Ishee’s agent negligently damaged a new 1978 Ford Pinto owned by Dukes. Ishee argues (1) the hearing included no testimony showing the reasonableness and necessity of the cost ($2750) of proposed repairs and (2) the court erroneously awarded the balance of the judgment ($2500) as “lost profit.”

Because damages which could reasonably have been mitigated cannot be an element of tort recovery, we have held the cost of repairs may be recovered only if “reasonable and necessary.” *See, e. g., Hartford Ins. Group v. Massey,*216 So.2d 415, 416 (Miss.1968). The record here fails to dis*761close the pre-tort retail market value of the vehicle, making it impossible to determine the necessity of the proposed repairs toward mitigating damages.

The proper measure of tort damages for a plaintiff holding personalty for sale in the retail market is the total diminution in retail market value proximately caused by the defendant’s tort. Cost of repair may be recovered, as well as the remaining diminution in pre-tort value after the proposed repairs, but in no event may cost of repair be recovered to the extent it exceeds the total diminution in pre-tort value in the case of one holding personalty for sale rather than for personal use. *See gen. Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. Newman,*240 Miss. 10, 124 So.2d 686, 688 (1960). We note that in the case of a retail merchant this measure of damages may on occasion incidentally encompass the loss of anticipated profit in the event it is shown that some diminution in pre-tort retail market value remains even after reasonable necessary repairs have been accomplished. We say “incidentally” to reaffirm and distinguish *Mississippi Power Co. v. Harrison,*247 Miss. 400, 152 So.2d 892 (1963).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-4025

___________

Patricia Brooks, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Laboratory Corporation of America, * Western District of Missouri.

*

Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Patrick Noland, Employee; Michelle *

Warneke, Employee, *

*

Defendants. *

___________

Submitted: June 6, 2007

Filed: June 13, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Brooks appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her employment lawsuit. Following careful review, we affirm for the reasons

provided by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 353
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 353.5 General rules. ( a ) *Registration is conclusive of ownership.* Definitive savings bonds were issued only in registered form. The registration must express the actual ownership of, and interest in, the bond. The registration is conclusive of ownership, except as provided in § 353.49.
( b ) *Requests for registration.* Registrations requested must be clear, accurate and complete, conform substantially with one of the forms set forth in this subpart, and include the taxpayer identifying number of the owner or first-named coowner. The taxpayer identifying number of the second-named coowner or beneficiary is not required but its inclusion is desirable. The registration of all bonds owned by the same person, organization, or fiduciary should be uniform with respect to the name of the owner and any description of the fiduciary capacity. An individual should be designated by the name he or she is ordinarily known by or uses in business, including at least one full given name. The name may be preceded or followed by any applicable title, such as *Miss, Mr., Mrs., Ms., Dr., Rev., M.D.,* or *D.D..* A suffix, such as *Sr.* or *Jr.,* must be included when ordinarily used or when necessary to distinguish the owner from another member of his family. A married woman's own given name, not that of her husband, must be used; for example, *Mary A. Jones* or *Mrs. Mary A. Jones,* NOT *Mrs. Frank B. Jones.* The address must include, where appropriate, the number and street, route, or any other local feature, city, State, and ZIP Code.
( c ) *Registration of bonds purchased as gifts.* If the bonds were purchased as gifts, awards, prizes, etc., and the taxpayer identifying numbers of the intended owners are not known, the purchaser's number must be furnished. Bonds so inscribed will not be associated with the purchaser's own holdings. Bonds so registered will not be associated with the purchaser's own holdings. If the purchaser so requests, a bond may be inscribed to provide a “Mail to” instruction, followed by a delivery name and address. No rights of ownership are conferred on such designee.
[44 FR 76441, Dec. 26, 1979, as amended at 55 FR 575, Jan. 5, 1990; 71 FR 46857, Aug. 15, 2006; 76 FR 66855, Oct. 31, 2011]
#### § 539.405 Importation of goods or technology from third countries.

Importation into the United States from third countries of goods or technology is prohibited if undertaken with knowledge or reason to know that those goods contain raw materials or components produced or provided by a designated foreign person or technology produced or provided by a designated foreign person.
# Barbados

63 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Barbados	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Barbados	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Barbados National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 30, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Barbados	  November 30, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Barbados	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Barbados	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Food Security across Latin America with Jose Fernandez, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment	  Jose W. FernandezJune 23, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Barbados	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Juan Gonzalez, National Security Council Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere and Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs	  Brian A. NicholsJune 1, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor for the Summit of the Americas Christopher Dodd Travel to Barbados	  April 26, 2022 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35281]


CSX Transportation, Inc.--Trackage Rights Exemption--Commonwealth 
Railway Incorporated

    Notice to the Parties:
    On August 12, 2009, a notice of exemption was served and published 
in the Federal Register (74 FR 40642) in this proceeding for the non-
exclusive overhead trackage rights granted to CSX Transportation, Inc., 
by Commonwealth Railway Incorporated (CRI) over CRI's line of railroad 
between Suffolk, VA, milepost 16.50, and Churchland, VA, milepost 9.90, 
a distance of approximately 6.60 miles. The notice, at note 2, 
contained a reference to the need to disclose interchange commitments 
pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4). Because trackage rights agreements are 
required to be filed with a party's verified notice of exemption and 
are available to the public, further disclosure is not required in a 
notice of exemption for trackage rights and will not be required in 
such notices in the future. All other information in the notice remains 
unchanged.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: August 20, 2009.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-20657 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P