alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gerald A. WEINGARTNER, Individually as a corporate member of Harbor Oaks Improvement Association and as President of and for the use and benefit of Harbor Oaks Improvement Association, a corporation not for profit, and In behalf of all members of the corporation similarly situated, Appellants, v. Edith D. JONES, Individually and as Secretary of Harbor Oaks Improvement Association, et al., Appellees.

No. S-414.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 1974.

Rehearing Denied June 12,1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Conviction and Sentencing of Aleksey Navalny on Additional Politically Motivated Charges

# 									Conviction and Sentencing of Aleksey Navalny on Additional Politically Motivated Charges							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 4, 2023

The United States condemns a Russian court’s further sentencing and conviction of opposition politician and anti-corruption campaigner Aleksey Navalny to an additional 19 years in prison on unfounded charges of so-called “extremism.” This is an unjust conclusion to an unjust trial.

For years, the Kremlin has attempted to silence Navalny and prevent his calls for transparency and accountability from reaching the Russian people. By conducting this latest trial in secret and limiting his lawyers’ access to purported evidence, Russian authorities illustrated yet again both the baselessness of their case and the lack of due process afforded to those who dare to criticize the regime.

Meanwhile, Russian authorities have repeatedly sent Navalny to solitary confinement, infringed upon his access to counsel, and denied him medical care. The United States strongly condemns Russia’s continued detention of Navalny, Vladimir Kara-Murza, and the more than 500 other designated political prisoners Russia holds. We will continue to follow their cases closely and advocate for the release of all unjustly detained persons. We once again join Mr. Navalny’s family, colleagues, and supporters around the world in calling for his immediate release, and an end to the continued repression of independent voices in Russia.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsHuman RightsLawOffice of the SpokespersonRussia

Back to Top
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

______________________ 

HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K.,

Appellant

v.

SEMICAPS PTE LTD.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2019-1890, 2019-1891

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-

02110, IPR2017-02112.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA; 

DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO

MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC. 

CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang 

LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 15, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2020
#### Joseph A. Kristen, appellant, *v.*John C. Lloyd, respondent.

[Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Mr. William H. K. JDavey,*for the appellant.

*Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by "Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in *103 N. J. Eq. 252.*

*For affirmance*— The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2773

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

purposes.electric projects in North Carolina, and for otherAct applicable to the construction of 2 hydro-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2773

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of 2 hydroelectric projects in

North Carolina, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2773 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

2 (a) PROJECT NUMBERED 10812.—

3 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time

4 period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power

5 Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to

6 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project

7 numbered 10812, the Commission shall, at the re8 quest of the licensee for the project, and after rea9 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith,

10 due diligence, and public interest requirements of

11 that section and the Commission’s procedures under

12 that section, extend the time period during which

13 the licensee is required to commence the construc14 tion of the project, under the extension described in

15 paragraph (2), for not more than 3 consecutive 2-

16 year periods.

17 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall

18 take effect on the date of the expiration of the ex19 tension of the period required for commencement of

20 construction of the project described in paragraph

21 (1) that the Commission issued, prior to the date of

22 enactment of this Act, under section 13 of the Fed23 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

24 (b) PROJECT NUMBERED 6879.—

25 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time

26 period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power
3

•HR 2773 EH

1 Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to

2 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project

3 numbered 6879, the Commission may, at the request

4 of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable

5 notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili6 gence, and public interest requirements of that sec7 tion and the Commission’s procedures under that

8 section, extend the time period during which the li9 censee is required to commence the construction of

10 the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year

11 periods.

12 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall

13 take effect on the date of the expiration of the pe14 riod required for commencement of construction of

15 the project under the license for the project.

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Archie L. Wisner, Respondent, *v.*Osteyee Bros., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

March, 1898.)

Coupons of negotiable bonds of a corporation — Proof that the holder took them in bad faith. ■

Where an action is brought upon a coupon of a negotiable bond issued by a corporation, it is entitled to show that the plaintiff received it in bad faith, knowing that it was stolen and that he had not parted with value for it; as the special immunities of the holders of such instruments extend only to .those persons who have acquired them before maturity in good faith and for value.

Appeal from a judgment iof the District Court of tire City of Hew York for the sixth judicial district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

*124Benjamin Patterson, for appellant.

Samuel O. Herriman, for respondent.

Beekman, P. J.

The respondent brought this action to recover the amount of a coupon which had been attached to a bond issued by the appellant, which is a corporation. The proof, as far as it went, tended to show that he had come into possession; of the instrument ¡before maturity, and he ¡was entitled to the presumption which obtains under such circumstances that he had acquired title thereto in good faith and for .value — a presumption, however, which may be overcome by evidence tending to show the contrary. The trial justice, however, refused to allow the appellant to show that the respondent had received the coupon in bad faith, with knowledge of the fact that it had been stolen, and without having parted with any value therefor. In ruling upon .the question, the justice stated as follows: “The question is not allowed, upon the-ground that there is no evidence before the court that the instrument which is offered here is anything but • a negotiable paper, and under the .decisions of the highest courts, in both state and the "United States, the coupons are negotiable and payable to the person having possession thereof.”

It Es true that such an instrument is correctly classified as negotiable (Evertson v. National Bank of Newport, 66 N. Y. 14), but the special immunities which are enjoyed by the holders of such paper extend only to those who have acquired it before maturity, in good faith and for a valuable consideration. The appellant was, therefore, entitled to show that the respondent was not such 'a holder, and to adduce evidence tending to impeach his title jto the coupon in question. As the ruling excepted to was clearly erroneous, the judgment must be reversed. i

The objection taken by the appellant to. the admission in evidence of the coupon was not broad enough to raise the question of the sufficiency of its proof. In order ,to take advantage (of this omission, the objection should have been specifically made on that ground.

Judgment' reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

G-ildebsleeve and Gtiegebich, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.'
§ 558.513 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates for personal, non-commercial use. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part are authorized are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities are: ( i ) Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* For the purposes of this section, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* For the purposes of this section, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 558.513 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2850 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2850

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of 
           certain minors for burial in national cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1996

Mr. Stump (for himself and Mr. Montgomery) (both by request) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of 
           certain minors for burial in national cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN MINORS FOR BURIAL IN NATIONAL 
              CEMETERIES.

    (a) Eligibility.--Paragraph (5) of section 2402 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: 
``For purposes of this paragraph, a `minor child' is a child under 21 
years of age, or under 23 years of age if pursuing a program of 
education at an educational institution, and those terms have the 
meaning as defined in sections 3452 (b) and (c) of this title.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 101(4)(A) of such title is 
amended by striking out ``chapter 19'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``chapters 19 and 24''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 586.308 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money services businesses, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
§ 591.406 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked. ( a ) Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 591.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 591.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
( b ) This section, which deals with the consequences of ownership of entities, in no way limits the definition of the Government of Venezuela in E.O. 13884, which includes within its definition other persons whose property and interests in property are blocked but who are not on the SDN List.
[87 FR 78480, Dec. 21, 2022]
Maryland Department of the Environment 

Notice of Public Hearing on Air Quality Plan 

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) will hold a Public Hearing on a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing the 8-hour Ozone Standard for Cecil County, Maryland. The 

Philadelphia Nonattainment Area (Philadelphia - Wilmington - Atlantic City, PA - DE - MD - NJ ozone 

nonattainment region), which includes Cecil County, Maryland, has been designated nonattainment under 

the 8-Hour Ozone standard. The Hearing will be held on: 

May 24th at 6:00 PM at the Cecil County Health Department, 401 Bow Street, Elkton, Maryland 

21921 

The Public Hearing will be held as required by federal law (Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.c. 7410 (a) and 

40 CFR 51.102). After consideration of comments received, the plan will be finalized and submitted to the 

United State Environmental Protection Agency. 

The proposed plan is titled the Cecil County, Maryland 8-hour Ozone State Implementation Plan and Base 

Year Inventory. The plan consists of a reasonable further progress plan, an attainment demonstration, a 

reasonably available control measure analysis, contingency plans, and mobile source emission budgets. 

This plan also contains the base year 2002 emissions inventory, which serves as the basis for all planning 

activities related to the 8-hour ozone standard for Cecil County, Maryland. 

The SIP document has been made available on the Maryland Department of the Environment's website at 

http://www.mde.state.md.us/Programs/ AirPrograms/air planning/index.asp Note: the public library 

systems in the region can be used for Internet access to view the document. 

Copies of the document can be viewed at: 

1. Maryland Department of the Environment Office, Air and Radiation Management Administration, 

1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore, Maryland - Contact: Andrew Heltibridle or 

Brian Hug. 

Comments may be presented at the hearing, mailed, emailed, or faxed to Brian J. Hug, Maryland 

Department of the Environment, Air and Radiation Management Administration, 1800 Washington 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD, 21230, Fax # 410-537-4223, bhug@mde.state.md.us to be received before 

close of business May 24, 2007. 

A hearing impaired person may request that an interpreter be present at the hearing by notifying MDE five 

(5) business days before the hearing. TTY via Maryland Relay for the hearing impaired is (410) 537-

4396. 

For more information contact Andrew Heltibridle, Natural Resource Planner, at (410) 537-3245 (Toll free 

in Maryland call (800) 633-6101 ext. 3245) or AHeltibridle@mde.state.md.us.
§ 589.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201; or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201, also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 589.201.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000336

24-JUN-2015

08:26 AM
§ 551.305 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to a person listed in the Annex to E.O. 13536, as amended by E.O. 13620, 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 13, 2010;
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 551.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked; and
( 3 ) With respect to the prohibition set forth in § 551.207, 2:00 p.m. eastern daylight time, July 20, 2012.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
www.gpo.gov

### §14. Acquisition of land; cooperation with other agencies

For the purpose of sections 13 to 16 of this title the Secretary, acting through the United States Bureau of Mines, is authorized to acquire land and interests therein, and to accept in the name of the United States donations of any property, real or personal, and to utilize voluntary or uncompensated services at such laboratory. The Secretary is authorized and directed to cooperate with other departments or agencies of the Federal Government, States, and State agencies and institutions, counties, municipalities, business or other organizations, corporations, associations, universities, scientific societies, and individuals, upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe.

(Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 764, §2, 56 Stat. 1057.)

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.
## lAC E TR AVE L NE WYOR KOFFIC E DEP I - ;,'l9l,E3©tl41s t street , 3r d Floor , Ne wYork , N Y1001 7

; ' Phone : 212-972-320 0 Tol l Free : (800 ) 872-422 3

, , ^ „ „„, „ -, - Fax:212-286-904 6 Marc h 9 , 201 0 - ; •' ; j 2 Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretar y Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 Subject : Honed a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretar yLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor t o f American' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned y Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda

. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam o administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k Ope n Skies agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S

. airlines

. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne w Yori ct o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n tw o o fth e world' s financia l center s Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n is likewis e committe d t o th e greate rNe wYor k communit yan d ha s provide d Ne wYor k wit h unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e 1930s

. Th e Ne wYor k

Metropolita n are a wil l gai n a significan t economi cbenefi t fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK/Honed a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o so yye s t o America n Airline s an d its reques t fo rslots t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haneda ! Sincerely ,

Presiden t & CE O
HomeThe Bahamas

# The Bahamas

70 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Donation of 5.5 Million Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine to CARICOM Countries	  Ned PriceAugust 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: The Bahamas	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The Bahamas Independence Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 10, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: The Bahamas	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: The Bahamas	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: The Bahamas	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken’s Roundtable with CARICOM Foreign Ministers	  April 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: The Bahamas	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: The Bahamas Summary	   

previous page1234567next page

Back to Top