alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Click here to skip navigation
follow this link to enable alert boxes for your session profile

follow this link to disable alert boxes for your session profile

Official Website of the Office of Personnel Management

            - Contact FEB Operations
            - FAQs

                -  All of OPM
                -  About
                -  Policy
                -  Insurance
                -  Retirement
                -  Investigations
                -  Agency Services
                -  News
                -  FAQs

          - 
          - Newark FEB

            -  Committees + Councils 
            -  Resources 
            -  Events Calendar 
            -  Contact Us 

          - Select Location

# Newark, New Jersey

## Federal Executive Board

FEB.govLocationsNewark

## About this FEB

The FEB of Metropolitan Northern NJ is made up of approximately 80 heads of Federal agencies in the twelve (12) northern counties of New Jersey. It receives direction and policy guidance from the Office of Personnel Management.

It provides a forum for principal Federal officials to get personally acquainted with one another, to share experiences, knowledge, and if need be, personnel and equipment.

Excellent communications have been established between the Board and Washington so that field executives can learn quickly of nation objectives which have presidential interest. Some of our current objectives include, Emergency Preparedness, Security and Employee Safety, Human Capital Readiness, Combined Federal Campaign, Awards Program, and Community Relations.

## Board Leadership

Chairperson

Dorisse Shakir-Ullah

Email: dorisse.shakir-ullah@fbi.gov

More info

Administrative OfficerFederal Bureau of Investigation

Vice Chairperson

Thomas Carter

Email: thomas.carter@tsa.dhs.gov 

More info

Federal Security DirectorTransportation Security Administration

Treasurer

John Thompson

Email: john.e.thompson@uscis.dhs.gov

More info

District DirectorCitizenship and Immigration Services

Executive Director

Alejandro De La Campa

Email: alejandro.delacampa@fema.dhs.gov

More info

## Events Calendar

There are no events planned for this FEB location.

          - About
          - Locations
          - Plans & Reports
          - FAQs

Official website of the U.S. Government operated by the Office of Personnel Management
          - Accessibility
          - Privacy Policy
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act Data
          - USA.Gov

          -
#### § 582.312 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Michael C. Mayer, certify that:I, Michael C. Mayer, certify that:  1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bank of Commerce Holdings (the“registrant”);  2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervisions, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b. [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.*/s/*MICHAEL C. MAYERMichael C. Mayer
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Paul
Vanderslice, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and
all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P7 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all
of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic
Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; Torchlight Loan Services, LLC; and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association.

Date:    March 29, 2018



|                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Vanderslice                                                                                                                   
|Paul Vanderslice
President, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2017-P7 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification (2017)
40733.

#### HOGAN v. SCOTT.

Felton, Chief Judge.

*Code Ann.*§ 110-1001 provides in part: “A judgment shall become dormant and shall not be enforced: ... 2. Unless entry is made on the execution by an officer authorized to levy and return the same and such entry and the date thereof are entered by the clerk on the general execution docket within seven years after issuance of the execution *and its record. .*.” (Emphasis supplied.) Accordingly, where the execution dated September 15, 1953, on a judgment obtained by the plaintiff in the Civil Court of Fulton County on September 9, 1953, has no such entry thereon, the judgment became dormant seven years after the January 27, 1955, recording of the execution in the General Execution Docket of Fulton County by the Clerk of the Superior Court of that county, i. e., on January 26, 1962. The plaintiff’s petition in the Civil Court of Fulton County for scire facias to revive the dormant judgment was filed on October 15, 1963, which was within three years from the time the judgment became dormant, as required by *Code*§ 110-1003, and complied with all the procedural requirements of *Code*§ 110-1006; service of the writ by the Marshal of the Civil Court of Fulton County was valid as authorized by the provisions of Ga. L. 1913, pp. 145, 160, § 33, which created the Municipal *800Court of Atlanta, the territorial jurisdiction of which was extended to all of Fulton County by Ga. L. 1925, pp. 370, 371, and the name of which was changed to the Civil Court of Fulton County by Ga. L. 1939, p. 449; therefore the court did not err in its judgment reviving the judgment, ordering execution to issue thereon, and awarding costs to the plaintiff.

Decided June 2, 1964.

*Kanes, Benator & Lambros, Nick G. Lambros,*for plaintiff in error.

*Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, Harold C. McKenzie, Jr.,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
§ 588.507 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 588.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 588.508, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 588.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 588.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 588.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 588.507 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-452-CR

VICTOR BORJAS SOTO

A/K/A VICTOR BARJAS SOTO	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On November 26, 2007, appellant Victor Borjas Soto a/k/a Victor Barjas Soto pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon pursuant to a plea bargain.  In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court sentenced him to ten years’ confinement.  Although appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in this court, the trial court’s certification of his right to appeal shows that this case “is a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has NO right of appeal.”

	On December 14, 2007, we sent a letter to appellant’s court-appointed counsel informing him of the trial court’s certification and giving appellant, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, until December 27, 2007 to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed unless we received such a response.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  On January 7, 2007, we received a letter from appellant’s counsel, in which he agreed that appellant has no right of appeal and dismissal is appropriate.

	Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.).

	  							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 7, 2008
§ 585.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 585.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 585.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
#### John R. CARLSON, Appellant, v. Patricia L. CARLSON, Appellee.

No. 77-2699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 20, 1979.

Albert J. Zemlock, Miami, Abraham Zem-lock, New York City, for appellant.

Sidney B. Shapiro, North Miami Beach, Mitchell M. Goldman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Sisson v. Sisson,*336 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1976); *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); *Bucci*v. *Bucci,*350 So.2d 786, 788-89 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Pfohl v. Pfohl,*345 So.2d 371, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Rogoff v. Rogoff,*115 So.2d 456, 458 (Fla.3d DCA 1959).

BARKDULL, J., dissents.
#### § 592.604 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to OFAC, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a federal district court.

[83 FR 28374, June 19, 2018]
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April1, 2017, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., asCertificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trusteewith respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-P7(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, DanielBober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do herebycertify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of theMaster Servicer during the period from April 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017(the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during suchperiod has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 05, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 05, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A1874. THE STATE v. ALEXIJA HUNT.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frank C. FEEBACK and Irma Jean Wilhite.

No. 81-K-0473.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 23, 1981.

In re Frank C. Feeback and Irma Jean Wilhite, applying for stay of execution of sentence. Ouachita Parish. No. M:41470.

*946Execution of sentence stayed until after the ruling of the trial judge on the hearing of the motion to stay execution, now fixed for February 25, 1981.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 321.0 Purpose. These regulations govern the manner in which financial institutions may qualify and act as paying agents for the redemption of: ( a ) Definitive United States Savings Bonds of Series A, B, C, D, E, EE, and I, and United States Savings Notes (Freedom Shares), presented for cash payment; and
( b ) Eligible definitive Series E and Series EE savings bonds and savings notes presented for redemption in exchange for Series HH savings bonds under the provisions of Department of the Treasury Circular, Fiscal Service Series No. 2-80 (31 CFR part 352).
[77 FR 16166, Mar. 20, 2012]
40614.

#### OLIVER v. BEASLEY.

Decided April 7, 1964.

*Dan S. Cowart,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. D. Dubberly, Sr.,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

“[W]here the grounds of attachment fail, the replevy bond, in so far as it is sought to bind the sureties thereon, fails also. In such event there is no liability of the sureties on the bond, but their remedy is by affidavit of illegality. . .” *Patne v.*Oliver, 96 Ga. App. 644, 647 (101 SE2d 154) and citations. Accord: *Bruce v. Conyers,*54 Ga. 678 (1); *Neal v. Gordon,*60 Ga. 112 (1); *Philip Carey Co. v. Sheppard,*19 Ga. App. 368 (2) (91 SE 444). The trial court properly sustained the surety’s affidavit of illegality and that judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          28,027
<SECURITIES>                                    25,737
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,232
<PP&E>                                         689,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,096
<BONDS>                                        326,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   654,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,323
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.64
        

</TABLE>
# Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Releases

4504 items

        -    Report  		Norway	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Netherlands	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Montenegro	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Monaco	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Moldova	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Malta	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Macedonia	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Luxembourg	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Lithuania	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Liechtenstein	  May 29, 2018 

previous page1…426427428429430…451next page

Back to Top