2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 6-1-2009 

# U SA v . S andr a B uck

e ridge P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 08-2744

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . S a ndr a B ucke r id g e " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1256. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1256NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

____________ N o. 08- 2744

____________ UNI T E D S T AT E S OF AM E RI CA , A ppel l ee

v. S ANDR A YVON NE BU CK E RI DGE

a /k /a N at as ha M as s i cot Sandr a Y vonne B ucker i dge, A ppel l ant

____________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt fort he D i s t r i ctof t he V i r gi n I s l ands ( D . C . N o. 07- cr - 00017) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e C ur t i s V . G om ez

____________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

A pr i l 21, 2009 B e f o re : B A R R Y , H A R D IM A N a n d C O W E N , C i r cui tJudges .

( Fi l ed: J une 01, 2009)

____________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT

____________2

H A R D IM A N , C i r cui tJudge . Sandr a B ucker i dge appe al s herconvi ct i on foraggr avat ed i dent i t yt hefti n vi ol at i on of 18 U . S. C . § 1028A ( a) ( 1) ( C ountI V ) . B ucker i dge ar gues t hat§ 1028A ( a) ( 1) r equi r es t hatt he G over nm entpr ove bey ond a r eas onabl e doubtt hats he knew t he document s s he us ed i n comm i t t i ng herunder l y i ng fel onybel onged t o an ac tual per s on. T hi s i s s ue, w hi ch w as t he subj ectof a d i fference o f op i nion am on g the U nit ed S t at es C ou rt s of A pp eal s, w as r es ol ved byt he Supr eme C our ti n F l or es - F iguer oa v. U ni t ed Stat es , 129 S. C t . 1886 ( 2009) . I n F l or es - F iguer oa , t he C our thel d t hatt he G overnm entm us ts how t hatt he d e f e n d a n t k n e w th a t th e m e a n s o f id e n tific a tio n h e u se d b e lo n g e d to a n o th e r p e rso n in o rd e r t o p ro v e a g g ra v a te d id e n tity th e f t. I d. at1888. B eca us e the G overnm entm ade no e f f o rt to p ro v e th a t B u c k e rid g e h a d su c h k n o w led g e , ith a s rig h tlyc o n c e d e d in its s uppl ement al br i ef thatB ucker i dge’ s convi ct i on foraggr avat ed i dent i t yt heftm us tbe vaca t ed. A ccor di ngl y , w e w i l l vaca t e B ucker i dge’ s convi ct i on on C ountI V and r emand forr es ent enci ng.