alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

August 22, 1996


Timothy Jenson
Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Merisel, Inc.
200 Continental Blvd.
El Segundo, CA 90245

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Dear Tim:

     This letter amends that certain letter agreement dated
November 29, 1995 and that certain letter agreement dated
April 9, 1996 (together the "Letter Agreement") both of
which are between you and Merisel, Inc. ("Merisel).  Except
as specifically amended hereby, the Letter Agreement remains
in full force and effect.

     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
the Letter Agreement, for purposes of the Letter Agreement,
as amended hereby, the definition of Applicable Time Period
is hereby amended to mean a two year period commencing after
the date of this letter.

     If you agree to the terms of this amendment to the
Letter Agreement and intend to be bound by the Letter
Agreement, as amended hereby, please so indicate by signing
the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to me.
Thank you.

Sincerely,


/s/Dwight A. Steffensen
Dwight A. Steffensen
Chief Executive Officer


Accepted and agreed to:


/s/ Timothy N. Jenson
Timothy N. Jenson
§ 552.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 552.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 552.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
§ 515.415 Travel to Cuba; transportation of certain Cuban nationals. ( a ) The following transactions are prohibited by § 515.201 when in connection with the transportation of any Cuban national, except a Cuban national holding an unexpired immigrant or non-immigrant visa or a returning resident of the United States, from Cuba to the United States, unless otherwise licensed: ( 1 ) Transactions incident to travel to, from, or within Cuba;
( 2 ) The transportation to Cuba of a vessel or aircraft;
( 3 ) The transportation into the United States of any vessel or aircraft which has been in Cuba since the effective date, regardless of registry;
( 4 ) The provision of any services to a Cuban national, regardless of whether any consideration for such services is furnished by the Cuban national;
( 5 ) The transportation or importation of baggage or other property of a Cuban national;
( 6 ) The transfer of funds or other property to any person where such transfer involves the provision of services to a Cuban national or the transportation or importation of, or any transactions involving, property in which Cuba or any Cuban national has any interest, including baggage or other such property;
( 7 ) Any other transaction such as payment of port fees and charges in Cuba and payment for fuel, meals, lodging; and
( 8 ) The receipt or acceptance of any gratuity, grant, or support in the form of meals, lodging, fuel, payments of travel or maintenance expenses, or otherwise, in connection with travel to or from Cuba or travel or maintenance within Cuba.
( b ) Transactions incident to the travel to the United States of Cuban nationals who are traveling other than in a non-immigrant status or pursuant to other non-immigrant travel authorization issued by the U.S. government are not authorized under the provisions of § 515.571.
( c ) Transactions described in paragraph (a) of this section are not “transactions ordinarily incident to travel to and from Cuba” as set forth in § 515.560(c).
[45 FR 32671, May 19, 1980, as amended at 64 FR 25812, May 13, 1999; 80 FR 56919, Sept. 21, 2015]
HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...the United States Presidents Emergency Plan for Aids Relief  Releases

# The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Releases

99 items

        -    		PEPFAR at the 77th Session of the U.N. General Assembly and the Global Fund Replenishment Conference	   
        -    PEPFAR Release  		U.S. Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong awarded Prestigious Virchow Prize for Global Health	  September 16, 2022 
        -    PEPFAR Statement  		Virchow Prize for Global Health – Statement by Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong	  John N. NkengasongSeptember 16, 2022 
        -    		PEPFAR Shows Impact with 5.5 Million Babies Born HIV-Free Due to Comprehensive Program Efforts	  July 29, 2022 
        -    		PEPFAR 2022 Annual Meeting Award Winners	  Montreal, Canada 
        -    		PEPFAR at AIDS 2022 Montreal	   
        -    		AIDS – DREAMS Supplement June 15, 2022	  July 25, 2022 
        -    		Statement from U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong, on Use of the PEPFAR Platform for Monkeypox Response	  July 25, 2022 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		PEPFAR Stands with LGBTQI+ Individuals; Planned Programming for COP22 surpasses $235 million; New Partnership with UNDP to Counter Punitive and Discriminatory Laws	  John N. NkengasongJune 22, 2022 
        -    		Arrival Message from Amb. John N. Nkengasong, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy	  John N. NkengasongJune 13, 2022 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
#### § 583.303 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
www.gpo.gov

### §611. Common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, pumicite, or cinders, and petrified wood

No deposit of common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, pumicite, or cinders and no deposit of petrified wood shall be deemed a valuable mineral deposit within the meaning of the mining laws of the United States so as to give effective validity to any mining claim hereafter located under such mining laws: *Provided, however*, That nothing herein shall affect the validity of any mining location based upon discovery of some other mineral occurring in or in association with such a deposit. “Common varieties” as used in this subchapter and sections 601 and 603 of this title does not include deposits of such materials which are valuable because the deposit has some property giving it distinct and special value and does not include so-called “block pumice” which occurs in nature in pieces having one dimension of two inches or more. “Petrified wood” as used in this subchapter and sections 601 and 603 of this title means agatized, opalized, petrified, or silicified wood, or any material formed by the replacement of wood by silica or other matter.

(July 23, 1955, ch. 375, §3, 69 Stat. 368; Pub. L. 87–713, §1, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 652.)

#### References In Text

The mining laws of the United States, referred to in text, are classified generally to this title.

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–713 defined “petrified wood”, and provided that no deposit of petrified wood shall be deemed a valuable mineral deposit within the mining laws of the United States.

#### Regulations for Removal of Limited Quantities of Petrified Wood

Section 2 of Pub. L. 87–713 provided that: “The Secretary of the Interior shall provide by regulation that limited quantities of petrified wood may be removed without charge from those public lands which he shall specify.”
- Program Home
- Key Topics
- Notes and Notices

HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Accreditation

# 									Accreditation							

Circular Notes and Notices

**04/22/24:****Diplomatic Note 24-732: Non-Eligibility for Public Benefits**

**04/22/24:****Notice: Non-Eligibility for Public Benefits**

**02/09/24:****Notice: New “Notification of Change” Function within eGov**

**06/21/23:****Diplomatic Note No. 23-1170:  Interventions Beyond the Reasonable Provision of Consular Services**

**04/18/23:****Notice: I-566 Update Change of Status**

**03/21/23:**Notice: New Requirements for Notifications of Appointment (NOA) and Notification of Change (NOC)

**06/13/22:**Notice: X Gender Marker Available in eGov

**03/16/22:**Notice: New Requirements for Submitting Notifications of Appointment (NOA) and Notification of Change (NOC) Late Arrival

**08/02/21:**Diplomatic Note 21-1264: Accreditation Policy Handbook

**08/02/21:**Diplomatic Note 21-1262: Changes to Department’s Accreditation Policy – Duration of Accreditation

**08/13/19:**Diplomatic Note 29-B OAS: OFM Service Fees

**08/09/19:**Diplomatic Note 19-1093: OFM Service Fees

**02/11/19:**Diplomatic Note 19-206: Return of ID Cards, Tax Cards, Driver’s Licenses and License Plates upon Termination

**08/01/18:** USUN Diplomatic Note HC-64-18: Citizenship Acquisition Letter

**08/01/18:**USOAS Diplomatic Note 44-B: Citizenship Acquisition Letters (Permanent Missions)

**08/01/18:**USOAS Diplomatic Note 43-B: Citizenship Acquisition Letters (OAS Personnel)

**07/19/18:**Diplomatic Note 18-1137: Citizenship Acquisition Letters

**07/06/18:**Diplomatic Note 18-1029: New Policy – Visa and Accreditation Eligibility for Same Sex Partners of Principal Foreign Mission Members

**12/07/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-1953: Immediate Family Member Visa Regulation Changes

**12/07/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-1940: Service Passports

**10/21/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-1669: Eyeglass Policy for Visa Application

**07/12/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-1089: ID Cards for Consular Spouses

**06/06/16:**USUN Diplomatic Note HC-57-16: Application Requirements for G-1, G-2, or G-3 Visas

**06/22/16:**USOAS Diplomatic Note 26-B: Application Requirements for G-4 Visas

**06/22/16:**USOAS Diplomatic Note 27-B: Application Requirements for G-1, G-2, or G-3 Visas

**06/07/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-886: Application Requirements for G-4 Visas

**06/03/16:**Diplomatic Note 16-855: Application Requirements for A-1 and A-2 Visas

**01/09/15:**Diplomatic Note: Accreditation Guidelines for International Organization (IO) Personnel

**04/09/14:**Diplomatic Note: Change in Passport Endorsement

**07/28/05:**Diplomatic Note 05-174: Notification of Head of a Consular Post

**11/01/91:**Diplomatic Note: Clarification of the “Permanently Resident In” Program

**04/10/91:**Diplomatic Note: Persons Considered to be “Permanently Resident In” the U.S.

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
#### Edward L. Frost, as Receiver, &c., of John Young, Respondent, *against*Owen McGinnis, Appellant.

(Decided January 7th, 1889.)

To enable a contractor for work on a building to procure materials, the owner made himself liable therefor and paid money to an amount more than called for by the contract. *Held,*that he might set off the indebtedness of the contractor to him for such payment against an action for extra work done on the building by the contractor, brought by the receiver of the latter’s property; and that he was not precluded from so setting it up by having failed to claim it as an off-set in proceedings to foreclose mechanic’s leins filed against the building.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the City of New York for the First Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*William C. Orr,*for appellant.

*H. M.*Hitchings, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

[Present, Van Hoesen and Bookstaver, J J.]—This action is brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of John Young, a judgment debtor, to recover for certain extra work done by Young for the defendant McGinnis on a lot and building in Pitt Street. Young had contracted with McGinnis for doing the mason work and furnishing the iron work on this building, and in order to enable Young to procure the iron work necessary, McGinnis had made himself liable to the parties furnishing it, and had, before the commencement of this action, actually paid $485 more than called for. by his contract with Young, and the latter was then indebted to McGinnis in that amount. The value of the extra work tlie justice found to be $35, and we think his conclusion as to the value fully sustained by the evidence. The justice rendered judgment against the defendant McGinnis for this amount. This, we think, was error.

*114The indebtedness of Young to McGinnis was properly pleaded as an .off-set against this extra work, and should have been allowed. The fact that he did not set it up as such in the action to foreclose the mechanics’ liens filed against the building did not constitute a waiver of the claim nor preclude him from setting it up in this action. And he "had as much right to set it up and maintain it as a defense in an action brought by the receiver as he would have had in an action brought by Young himself.

The judgment should therefore be reversed, with costs.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CENTENNIAL BANCORP'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCORPORATED INTO ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>              1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                    21,991,459
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     6,000,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           8,730,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               76,964,342
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               0
<LOANS>                                  186,517,192
<ALLOWANCE>                               (1,928,372)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           317,463,715
<DEPOSITS>                               267,880,292
<SHORT-TERM>                              11,419,123
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        2,574,240
<LONG-TERM>                                9,200,000
<COMMON>                                   9,302,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                17,087,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          317,463,715
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           20,908,425
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          3,440,648
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             925,095
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          25,274,168
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         7,498,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,004,456
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     16,269,712
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                350,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            65,895
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           11,503,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            6,693,118
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 4,551,318
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               4,551,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     0
<LOANS-NON>                                  478,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 645,000


<PAGE>


<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           1,700,130
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                161,891
<RECOVERIES>                                  40,133
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          1,928,372
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       1,928,372
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0496

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MERLE RAYMOND BRANSTETTER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the 

reply brief and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of 

time until January 2, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply

brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 19 2023

11/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0496
§ 553.701 Penalties. ( a ) Section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) (IEEPA) is applicable to violations of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, directive, or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under IEEPA. ( 1 ) A civil penalty not to exceed the amount set forth in section 206 of IEEPA may be imposed on any person who violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition issued under IEEPA.
( 2 ) IEEPA provides for a maximum civil penalty not to exceed the greater of $368,136 or an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed.
( 3 ) A person who willfully commits, willfully attempts to commit, willfully conspires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of a violation of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition may, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a natural person, be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both.
( b ) ( 1 ) The civil penalties provided in IEEPA are subject to adjustment pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-410, as amended, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note).
( 2 ) The criminal penalties provided in IEEPA are subject to adjustment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3571.
( c ) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned, or both.
( d ) Section 5(b) of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c(b)) (UNPA), provides that any person who willfully violates or evades or attempts to violate or evade any order, rule, or regulation issued by the President pursuant to Section 5(a) of the UNPA shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000 or, if a natural person, be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both.
( e ) Violations involving transactions described at section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA shall be subject only to the penalties set forth in paragraph (d) of this section.
( f ) Violations of this part may also be subject to other applicable laws.
[87 FR 58974, Sept. 29, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 2233, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 2142, Jan. 12, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP09-809-000]

      ( print page 43696)    
Take notice that Commission Staff will convene a technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding on Friday, September 11, 2009, at 10 a.m. (EST), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

On July 1, 2009, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. (Maritimes) filed revised tariff sheets to, among other things, reflect out-of-cycle changes in Maritimes' Fuel Retainage Quantity. On July 30, 2009, the Commission accepted and suspended Maritimes proposed tariff sheets revising Maritimes' fuel rate methodology and increasing its fuel charges, to become effective January 1, 2010, subject to refund and the outcome of a technical conference. During the technical conference, Commission Staff and interested persons will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised by Maritimes' out-of-cycle fuel filing.

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Anna Fernandez at (202) 502-6682 or e-mail                     *Anna-Fernandez@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-20642 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
  /s/ Patrick J. Moty
    

/s/ Linda J. MilesPatrick J. Moty
    
    Linda J. MilesPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of Parlex Corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

      (a)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ending September 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 13, 2002

/s/ Peter J. Murphy
-----------------------
Peter J. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>