alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bridget Geelan, Respondent, *v.*Sarah E. Cooke, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1898.)

Hegligence — A person injured in an auction-room by the act of a third party.

The proprietor of a public auction-room is not liable to an intending bidder who, while standing in the room with her back to three tables placed on top of each other, was injured because a stranger,. while handling the uppermost table, permitted it. to fall upon the bidder.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court of the City of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, in favor of the plaintiff.

Benjamin & Loeser, for appellant.

O. J. Hochstadter, for respondent.

Beekman, P. J.

The plaintiff has recovered .judgment against the defendant for damages, flowing from injuries which, she .¡has alleged and which the court below.has found to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The facts ¡of .the case are practically undisputed. The plaintiff testified that she went into the auction room ¡of the defendant, who seems to have been engaged in thé business of selling furniture and other articles at public auction, for-the purpose of bidding at a sale which was then going on in that place. After she had entered the- store, ..she observed, among other property apparently to be sold, three tables which were placed one upon' the other, the table at the top being a small' one weighing about ten pounds. She states that she was standing with her back to these tables when she heard a rattle behind her, and was immediately'struck by the falling .of the upper table and suffered the injuries complained of. ■ The witnesses: on behalf of the defendant testified that the fall of the table "was occasioned by the act of ,a stranger who wias attending the sale and who was seen by them handling the table, and that it fell while it was in Ms hands. This testimony was given not .only by an employee of the defendant, but also, by another person, a bystander, who was entirely disinterested. The evidence- thus given was not contradicted by the plaintiff. She herself was not in, a position, to oh-*461serve the cause of the occurrence, nor did she produce any. witness for the purpose of giving any other version of it. Hpon this state of the fact it is obvious that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, and the justice below should have dismissed the complaint. Steiker v. Plath, 19 App. Div. 376.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant, to abide the event.

Gtldebsleeve and Giegerich, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALFIN INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,744,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  642,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,341,805
<INVENTORY>                                  3,188,832
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,877,117
<PP&E>                                       5,218,155
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,795,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,031,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,525,679
<BONDS>                                        333,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    750,000
<COMMON>                                       117,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,363,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,031,877
<SALES>                                     19,823,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,823,279
<CGS>                                        6,952,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,970,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,860,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                   569,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,291,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,291,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
#### § 596.506 [Reserved]
#### Ollie BUFORD v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51712.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 21, 1980.

Walls, Buck & Irving, Robert E. Buck, Greenville, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Susan L. Runnels, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Panola County; Andrew C. Baker, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
HomeFinland

# Finland

170 items

        -    Speech  		Russia’s Strategic Failure and Ukraine’s Secure Future	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 2, 2023Helsinki City HallHelsinki, Finland 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement of the United States and Finland on Cooperation in Advanced Wireless Communications 	  June 2, 2023 
        -    		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto At the Signing of the 6G Joint Statement	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 2, 2023Ministry of Foreign AffairsHelsinki, Finland 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The United States and Finland: Old Friends, A New and Stronger Alliance	  June 1, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Sweden, Norway, Finland, France, and the UK	  May 31, 2023 
        -    		Travel to Sweden, Norway, and Finland, May 29-June 2, 2023	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Acting Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Dereck Hogan, Senior Advisor for the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Ruth Berry On the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Sweden, Norway, and Finland	  Dereck J. HoganMay 26, 2023Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Sweden, Norway, and Finland	  Matthew MillerMay 26, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Finland	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs  		NATO – Ottawa Agreement – Notification of Signature; Finland, May 11, 2023	   

previous page123456…17next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulating the Citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Formation of the Federation of BiH Government

# 									Congratulating the Citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Formation of the Federation of BiH Government							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

April 28, 2023

The United States congratulates the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the formation of the new government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.  We encourage the new ruling coalition to move quickly to advance Bosnia and Herzegovina along its Euro-Atlantic path by implementing important socioeconomic, rule of law, and anticorruption reforms. The United States remains a committed partner to Bosnia and Herzegovina and its people as they build a future in the Euro-Atlantic community.

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRule of Law

Back to Top
HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Dependent Work Authorization

# 									Dependent Work Authorization							

Circular Notes and Notices

**05/17/24:**Diplomatic Note 24-949: Social Security Number and Denial Letter Policies and Procedures

**05/17/24:**Notice: Social Security Number and Denial Letter Policies and Procedures

**05/13/24:****Notice: Updated USCIS Form I-765 and I-566**

**01/13/23:****Notice: Updated USCIS Application for Employment Authorization Form I-765**

**04/04/22:****Notice: Dependent Employment Authorization – Updated Information**

**03/16/22:****Diplomatic Note 22-506: Dependent Employment Authorization – Updated Information**

**03/16/22:****Notice: Department Work Authorizations – Form I-566 Updated**

**03/15/22:****Dependent Work Authorization Applications – Guide for Missions**

**08/31/21:****Notice: Dependent Work Authorization Requests – Update**

**02/24/21:****Notice: Dependent Work Authorization Requests**

**05/07/20:**Notice: New Requirement for Tax Documents to Support Requests for Employment Authorization Documents

**02/04/20:**Notice: Dependent Work Authorization Cover Letter

**01/24/20:**Notice:  Dependent Work Authorization – Use of White-Out or Correction Tape

**08/26/19:**Notice: Dependent Work Authorization USCIS I-566

**03/23/12:**Notice: Income Tax Requirements for Eligible Dependent Family Members Authorized to Work in the US

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
HomeIsrael

# Israel

906 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Tunisian Foreign Minister Jerandi	  May 17, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud	  May 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with French Foreign Minister Le Drian	  May 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani	  May 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  May 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Gary Pruitt, President and CEO of the Associated Press	  May 15, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Israel, West Bank and Gaza	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Israel, West Bank and Gaza	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 11, 2021	  Ned PriceMay 11, 2021 

previous page1…7980818283…91next page

Back to Top
§ 594.319 HAMAS. The term *HAMAS* means: ( a ) The entity known as HAMAS and designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189); or
( b ) Any person: ( 1 ) The property and interests in property of which are blocked pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*); and
( 2 ) Who is identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) maintained by OFAC as an agent, instrumentality, or affiliate of HAMAS.
Note 1 to § 594.319 :
The SDN List is accessible through the following page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/sdn .* Additional information pertaining to the SDN List can be found in appendix A to this chapter. Persons on the SDN List based on conduct described in § 594.201(a)(9), (10), (11) are identified by a special reference at the end of their entries on the SDN List—“[SHIELD-ACT]”—in addition to the reference to the regulatory part of this chapter pursuant to which their property and interests in property are blocked. For example, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, § 594.201(a)(9), (10), or (11), and identified on the SDN List will have the program tag “[SDGT]” and “[SHIELD-ACT].”
[84 FR 35313, July 23, 2019]
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Sri Lanka Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Sri Lanka Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges:** While Sri Lanka emerged in 2008 from decades of protracted and bloody internal conflict, the rebuilding process continues.  The government has achieved territorial control,  but continues to struggle with lack of institutional capacities, political support for criminal justice reform, and vulnerabilities to external threats such as increased narcotic trafficking in the Indian Ocean and terrorist attacks.

**Goals:** INL seeks to strengthen the rule of law in Sri Lanka by improving the performance of the criminal justice system to address criminal activities and deliver fair and equitable justice services to citizens. INL’s efforts have primarily focused on justice sector reform, but in recent years expanded to provide technical assistance for law enforcement to increase professionalism, transparency, and coordination and efficiency among law enforcement and justice sector organizations. Through specialized training and support for operational reform, INL is working to build the Government of Sri Lanka’s capacity to investigate and prosecute complex crimes like corruption, trafficking, financial crimes, and organized crime.

**Accomplishments:**  INL-supported capacity building has aided the investigation of key financial crimes cases and has introduced U.S. and international best practices to strengthen criminal justice functions. 

Tags

Sri Lanka

Back to Top
#### § 590.316 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or other extensions of credit, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
**Exhibit      3.1**

**CERTIFICATE      OF AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**THE      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**CYTOGEN      CORPORATION**

**CYTOGEN      CORPORATION**
**DOES HEREBY CERTIFY**

**FIRST**

**NOW,      THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED**

**“FIFTH**

**SECOND**

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF**

|   | CYTOGEN                  CORPORATION |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/  MICHAEL                    D. BECKER |
|   |                                 | Michael                  D. Becker, |
|   |                                 | President                  and Chief Executive Officer |
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-11128

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Cameron Jason Milton, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-415-2

______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cameron Jason Milton has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Milton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 1, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-11128 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024
No. 23-11128

2

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. 

Our review reveals a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment sets 

forth that Milton pleaded guilty to Count 3 of the superseding indictment. 

However, he pleaded guilty to Count 3 of the original indictment.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for 

the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 36.

Case: 23-11128 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/01/2024
HomeBurundi

# Burundi

51 items

        -    TIAS  		Burundi (03-724) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  July 24, 2003 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
585 P.2d 909

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Bradley Walden HALL, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 1482.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Oct. 19, 1978.

John A. LaSota, Jr., Atty. Gen. by Philip G. Urry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, for appel-lee.

John M. Neis, Pima County .Public Defender by Michael P. Roca, Asst. Public Defender, Tucson, for appellant.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pled guilty to possession of a stolen motor vehicle under A.R.S. Sec. 13-672.01. The plea agreement specified the offense would be treated as a misdemeanor and appellant was placed on probation for two years. As a condition of probation, it was ordered that appellant be confined in the county jail for one year. The sole point raised on appeal is whether this condition was proper. We think it was not.

Under A.R.S. Sec. 13-672.01, possession of a stolen motor vehicle, if treated as a misdemeanor, is subject to a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year or to a fine of not more than $1,000, or both. A.R.S. Sec. 13— 1657(A)(1) provides:

> “The court may suspend the imposing of sentence in misdemeanor cases and may direct that the suspension continue for a period of up to two years, even though the maximum term of sentence which may be imposed is up to one year or less, and shall place such person on probation on such terms and conditions as the court determines under the charge and supervision of the probation officer of the court during such suspension. The conditions imposed for a misdemeanor may include incarceration in the county jail for a specified period not to exceed one-half of the maximum time allowed for the offense or a fine not exceeding the amount of fine authorized for the offense.”

Appellant agrees that the court’s order suspending the imposition of sentence for two years is consistent with the statute. However, he argues that the requirement of one year in the county jail is contrary to the terms of the statute. We agree. The statute refers to the one-year incarceration in the county jail as being the maximum time allowed for the offense. The maximum time of incarceration as a condition of probation would be six months. We have reviewed the entire record before us and have found no other error.

The confinement in the county jail is modified to a term of six months, and the judgment and sentence as modified are affirmed.
# L_2022156EN.01015901.xml

| 9.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/159 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/159

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 198 of 22 June 2020
  )

On page 22, recital 43, first sentence:

for:

‘When establishing and updating the technical screening criteria the Commission should take into account relevant Union law, including Regulations (EC) No 1221/2009 (55) and (EC) 66/2010 (56) of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU (57) and the communication of the Commission of 16 July 2018 on “Public procurement for a better environment”.’,

read:

‘When establishing and updating the technical screening criteria the Commission should take into account relevant Union law, including Regulations (EC) No 1221/2009 (55) and (EC) No 66/2010 (56) of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU (57) and the communication of the Commission of 16 July 2008 on “Public procurement for a better environment”.’.

---
#### § 569.502 [Reserved]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2923

To extend for 4 additional years the waiver granted to the Watts Health

Foundation from the membership mix requirement for health maintenance organizations participating in the medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1996

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To extend for 4 additional years the waiver granted to the

Watts Health Foundation from the membership mix requirement for health maintenance organizations participating in the medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER OF ‘‘50/50 RULE’’ FOR

4 WATTS HEALTH FOUNDATION.

5 Section 9312(c)(3)(D)(i) of the Omnibus Budget

6 Reconciliation Act of 1986, as added by section 4018(d)

7 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 and
2

•HR 2923 IH

1 as amended by section 6212(a)(1) of the Omnibus Budget

2 Reconciliation Act of 1989 and section 13569 of the Om3 nibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, is amended by

4 striking ‘‘1996’’ and inserting ‘‘2000’’.

Æ
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of Centennial Bancorp's
Form S-8 Registration Statement Nos. 33-44701, 33-86650 and 333-32081, and in
Centennial Bancorp's Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2000, of our report dated January 19, 2001, except for Note 14, as
to which the date is January 24, 2001, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Centennial Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 1999, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000, which are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/S/ SYMONDS, EVANS & COMPANY, P.C.



Portland, Oregon
March 26, 2001