alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March                31, 2006                (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | information                contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The                Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 2, 2006 |                                     |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                     |
|                              | /s/                Eric W. Schrier       |
|                              | Eric                W. Schrier           |
|                              |                                     |
|                              |                                     |
|                              |                                     |
|                              | /s/                Michael S. Geltzeiler |
|                              | Michael                S. Geltzeiler     |
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ ROBERT ROSENKRANZ
------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Rosenkranz
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ THOMAS W. BURGHART
------------------------------------------------------------

Thomas W. Burghart
Vice President and Treasurer

November 12, 2003
Exhibit 34.17



LOGO

CohnReznick LLP

cohnreznick.com

Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Torchlight Loan Services, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria on SEC Regulation AB, that Torchlight Loan Services, LLC (the Company and the Asserting Party) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) Item 1122 of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the special servicing platform (Platform) for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions that were issued on or after December 1, 2002, for which the Company acted as special servicer as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph). Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Management has
determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv)
are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company, as a special servicer, with respect to the Companys Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in
the accompanying Managements Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB.

Our examination was
conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
managements assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about managements assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our
judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of managements assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2017, for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/CohnReznick LLP
|                  
|Bethesda, Maryland
|March 2, 2018
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Arthur WILLIAMS v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 67201.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Arthur Williams, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 257-523.

Denied.
§ 510.502 Effect of license or other authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by OFAC, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of such license or other authorization, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license is issued by OFAC and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any other part of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license specifically refers to such part.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction otherwise prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property that would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
( d ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to supersede the requirements established under any other provision of law or to relieve a person from any requirement to obtain a license or other authorization from another department or agency of the U.S. Government in compliance with applicable laws and regulations subject to the jurisdiction of that department or agency. For example, exports of goods, services, or technical data that are not prohibited by this part or that do not require a license by OFAC nevertheless may require authorization by the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of State, or other agencies of the U.S. Government.
( e ) No license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
( f ) Any payment relating to a transaction authorized in or pursuant to this part that is routed through the U.S. financial system should reference the relevant OFAC general or specific license authorizing the payment to avoid the blocking or rejection of the transfer.
#### § 553.314 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
#### § 553.307 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Cambodia National Day

# 									Cambodia National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 8, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my best wishes to the people of Cambodia as you celebrate 69 years of independence on November 9.

The United States commends Cambodia for its leadership of ASEAN during a challenging year. We value our cooperation with Cambodia in jointly addressing regional and global concerns, including the crises in Burma and Ukraine. We will continue to stand with Cambodians as they pursue a more prosperous, democratic, and independent future.

Congratulations to all Cambodians on your National Day.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCambodiaDemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonRegional IssuesThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Lafayette S. JAMERSON, as an individual dba Jamerson Contractors, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie BROWN, Mayor; Louise Renne, City Attorney of CCSF; Frank Y. Chiu, Director, Department of Building Inspection; Robert Passmore, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-15987.

D.C. No. CV-97-02800-VRW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

*470Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Lafayette S. Jamerson appeals pro se an order of the district court denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of summary judgment in his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review Rule 60(b) orders for an abuse of discretion. *Bateman v. United States Postal Serv.,*231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2000). Jamerson’s motion argued only that he failed to oppose summary judgment or to offer substantive opposition in his response to the order to show cause due to his pro se status. Because Jamerson did not point to any error of law or fact in the grant of summary judgment, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). That Jamerson chose to focus his attention on other litigation did not constitute excusable neglect under Rule 60(b)(1) or require extraordinary relief under Rule 60(b)(6). *See Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Llewellyn,*139 F.3d 664, 666 (9th Cir.1997); *cf. Bateman,*231 F.3d at 1225 (counsel knew of adversary counsel’s emergency travel but did not advise court and instead moved to have summary judgment granted as unopposed).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 444]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ444.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1929]]

Public Law 106-444
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 44, United States Code, to ensure preservation of the 
records of the Freedmen's Bureau. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2000 -  [H.R. 5157]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Freedmen's Bureau Records 
Preservation Act of 2000.>>  assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. <<NOTE: 44 USC 101 note.>> 

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedmen's Bureau Records 
Preservation Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF FREEDMEN'S BUREAU RECORDS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 29 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 2910. Preservation of Freedmen's Bureau records

    ``The Archivist shall preserve the records of the Bureau of 
Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, commonly referred to as the 
`Freedmen's Bureau', by using--
            ``(1) microfilm technology for preservation of the documents 
        comprising these records so that they can be maintained for 
        future generations; and
            ``(2) the results of the pilot project with the University 
        of Florida to create future partnerships with Howard University 
        and other institutions for the purposes of indexing these 
        records and making them more easily accessible to the public, 
        including historians, genealogists, and students, and for any 
        other purposes determined by the Archivist.''.

    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 29 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``2910. Preservation of Freedmen's Bureau records.''.

[[Page 114 STAT. 1930]]

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 2910 of 
title 44, United States Code (as added by section 2), a total of 
$3,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

    Approved November 6, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5157:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 19, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of the Chief of Protocol...Ceremonials Division

# Ceremonials Division

## 				Ceremonials Division			

					With an acute attention to detail, the Ceremonials Division plans, executes, and supports a wide range of ceremonial and official functions hosted by the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, and other high-ranking U.S. government officials. Events include, but are not limited to, official and state luncheons, ministerials, major international summits, receptions, and swearing-in ceremonies.  Each function is curated, keeping in mind both the needs of our honored guests and the ultimate policy objectives.  It is through the strategic integration of specially tailored event components and the application of diplomatic etiquette that the division sets the stage for successful diplomacy.  Ceremonials Officers plan each event meticulously, creating a minute by minute scenario and considering every detail from invitations and seating to menus, décor, and entertainment.  The guest experience is paramount and the environment should communicate mutual respect in an effort to facilitate meaningful dialogue.  Through these functions, the Ceremonials Division plays a key role in maintaining the traditions of international protocol to welcome and host foreign guests.Additionally, the Ceremonials Division organizes the participation of the foreign Diplomatic Corps members in special events and official public events such as Joint Sessions of Congress, Presidential inaugurations, state funerals, and other ceremonies. Ceremonials Officers advise on flag etiquette, forms of address, and event logistics and also maintain the Order of Precedence of the United States of America.				

Back to Top
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Fellowships
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of the Science and Technology Adviser...Contact Us – Office of the Science and Technology Adviser

# 									Contact Us							

Office of the Science and Technology Adviser

**Office of the Science and Technology Adviser**

Room 3240, Department of State

2201 C Street NWWashington, DC 20520Tel: (202) 647-8725Fax: (202) 647-5136

For general information or assistance, please e-mail us at:  **STAS_Office@groups.state.gov**

Tags

ScienceTechnology

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0567

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GARRETT MICHAEL O’HOWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 27 2022

12/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0567
§ 584.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a) has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note to § 584.504 :
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 584.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 106 ) IV-C-7

2 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 106 of 232P. 2 

# i 

# ft \

« 5 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENC Y ^ WASHINGTON , D.C. 2046 0 

### ^m** 

### FE B I 6 

### 1988

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADUTIO N

Mr . Willia

m T . Deibe l 642 6 N.E . Windermer e Roa d Seattle , Washingto

n9810 5 Dear Mr . Deibel : Thi s i nrespons e t o you

r Januar

y 5 , 1988 , lette r t o Senator Danie l Evan s expressin g your concer

nregardin

g EPA' s regulator

y proposa l t

o requir e onboar

d canister s o

nne w vehicle s t o contro l refuelin g emissions . You r letter wil l b

e place d i nou r publi c docke t wher e it wil l b e fully considere

d i nth e nex t phas e o f ou

r rulemakin

g process . Sincerel y yours , • . ; ..4 0 B Y

- ) : • •••-so " Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Senato r Danie l J . Evan s
AAM-12-187-E 

February 7, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10447 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0076 

Mr. John Crawford 

Designated Employer Representative/Owner 

Sierra Air Helicopters 

2409 Rickenbacker Way 

Auburn, CA 95602 

Dear Mr. Crawford: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 23, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Sierra Air Helicopters for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Sierra Air 

Helicopters which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Sierra Air Helicopters. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Sierra Air Helicopters an exemption from 14 CFR part 

120 to the extent necessary to allow Sierra Air Helicopters which is operating under separate 

parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, 

subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Sierra Air Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Sierra Air Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure