alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,041,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,142,542
<PP&E>                                      22,942,272
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,368,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,757,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          702,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,054,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,757,370
<SALES>                                      4,011,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,281,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,979,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                301,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.51
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons  Releases

# Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons Releases

1166 items

        -    		U.S. Government Response – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons	  April 24, 2019 
        -    		Agencies of the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons	   
        -    		Senior Policy Operating Group	   
        -    		The President’s Interagency Task Force	   
        -    		About Us – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on  2019 Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment Pursuant to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, as Reauthorized	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		International Programs — Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons	  April 17, 2019 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		Evaluation of the SEA Fisheries Project [PDF]	  March 26, 2019 
        -    		Domestic Trafficking Hotlines	   
        -    		Human Trafficking Research: U.S. Government-funded Research	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…111112113114115…117next page

Back to Top
#### § 589.510 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862612
<NAME> UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          21,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,108
<INVENTORY>                                    197,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               448,477
<PP&E>                                         604,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,121,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,115
<BONDS>                                        881,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (300,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,121,957
<SALES>                                        631,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               631,696
<CGS>                                          382,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  518,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   957
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,227
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Estate of Meredith et al. *v.*Skidmore, Admx., etc.

[No. 20,466.

Filed March 14, 1966.]

*459*John J. Dehvorth, Jr.,*of Rochester, for appellants.

*Jesse A. Broivn*and *Brown & Brown,*of Rochester, and *Arch N. Bobbitt,*and *Ruekelshaus, Bobbitt & O’Connor,*of Indianapolis, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein a demurrer was sustained to appellant’s petition to enforce an oral agreement to adopt. Said demurrer was sustained on June 25, 1965, and on plaintiff-appellant’s refusal to plead over, the court below entered judgment on that date. On July 26, 1965, plaintiff-appellant filed his motion for new trial, which was overruled on the same day. Thereafter, on October 21, 1965, plaintiff-appellant filed his transcript and assignment of errors with the Clerk of the Supreme and Appellate Courts.

Subsequently the appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal contending that Rule 2-2 of the Supreme Court of Indiana requires that appellant file his transcript and assignment of errors within ninety days from June 25, 1965, the date of the judgment, or on or before September 23, 1965. Appellees’ contention is based upon the presumption that upon the sustaining of the demurrer and the refusal to plead over, the judgment was final and the motion for a new trial was a nullity. We agree and cite as controlling the decision of this court in *Joyner, etc.*v. *The Housing Authority, etc.*(1959), 130 Ind. App. 167, 169, 162 N. E. 2d 685:

> *“A*finding and entry of judgment in favor of defendant after- the court has sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint where plaintiff refuses to plead over, costs being assessed against plaintiff, is a final judgment which is appealable. *Greensburg Water Co.*v. *Lewis*(1920), 189 Ind. *460439, 128 N. E. 103. The time for perfecting an appeal begins to run from that date.

> “The filing of the motion for a new trial in the instant case did not extend the time for taking the appeal in so far as the judgment on demurrer was concerned. The motion presents nothing to the trial court for its consideration. *Schneidt*v. *Schneidt*(1919), 69 Ind. App. 666, 122 N. E. 588. Thus, in so far as appellee Housing Authority is concerned, the appeal should have been filed within ninety days from the date judgment was entered after the demurrer was sustained. As this was not done, the appeal was not perfected in time.”

Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained. Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 659.
§ 582.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
586 P.2d 1325

#### Emmett DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph M. NAIFEH and Frances J. Naifeh, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2 CA-CIV 2947.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Oct. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 1978.

Review Denied Nov. 21, 1978.

*514Lesher, Kimble & Rucker, P. C., by Robert 0. Lesher, Tucson, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert C. Rowland, Tucson, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellant filed an action against appel-lees for rescission of a contract for the purchase of realty on the ground that he had been induced by fraud to enter into the contract. A provision in the contract stated:

> “If any suit shall be brought by either party to enforce or *cancel*this contract, the prevailing party to said suit shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses necessarily incurred by him in connection therewith, including a reasonable attorney’s fee to be fixed by the court.” (Emphasis added)

The trial court refused to award attorney’s fees. Appellant contends this was erroneous. We agree.

Appellees’ theory is that appellant cannot rescind the contract and at the same time attempt to enforce one of its provisions. This being a suit for rescission based on fraud, it was a suit to cancel the contract. Cf., 13 Am.Jur.2d, Cancellation of Instruments, Sec. 1, 16 & 17 (1964). While this theory may be true as a statement of abstract law, it does not apply here since the parties agreed otherwise.

In support of their position, appellees have cited the case of *Pickinpaugh v. Morton,*268 Or. 9, 519 P.2d 91 (1974). There, the contractual provision concerning attorney’s fees contained no clause allowing such fees in a suit to cancel the contract and is therefore inapposite.

The case is remanded with instructions to award appellant his reasonable attorney’s fee.

RICHMOND, C. J., and HATHAWAY, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                       1,082,416
<SECURITIES>                                   928,704
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,071,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                   309,393
<INVENTORY>                                 12,152,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,143,065
<PP&E>                                      57,462,614
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,896,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,263,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,862,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       501,733
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,263,523
<SALES>                                     20,119,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,365,559
<CGS>                                       15,664,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,234,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,084,872
<INCOME-TAX>                                   506,861
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,340,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,340,494
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
§ 597.515 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( 1 ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( 2 ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( 3 ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing; and
( 4 ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and
( 5 ) The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
( b ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
[87 FR 78481, Dec. 21, 2022]
# Argentina

137 items

        -    Report  		Argentina	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Argentina	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Argentina	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (16-629) – Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding of July 15, 1997 Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  June 29, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (16-323.1) – Agreement on Trade and Investment	  March 23, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (16-323) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime	  March 23, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (15-413) – Agreement Regarding Finance Clearance of Arrears	  April 13, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (13-930.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Regulatory and Safety Research Matters	  September 30, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (13-730) – Framework Agreement on Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space	  July 30, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (13-215) – Agreement Memorandum of Understanding on Use of U.S. Land Remove Sensing Satellite Data	  February 15, 2013 

previous page1…1011121314next page

Back to Top
#### § 560.802 Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 12613 of October 29, 1987 (3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 256), Executive Order 12957 of March 15, 1995 (3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 332), Executive Order 12959 of May 6, 1995 (3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356), Executive Order 13059 of August 19, 1997 (3 CFR, 1997 Comp., p. 217), Executive Order 13599 of February 5, 2012 (77 FR 6659, February 8, 2012), and any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12957, may be taken by the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11031

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEVONE RAY MADEN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-58-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Levone Ray Maden presents

arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d

1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v.

Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district court

may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-11031

2

sentence. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 546.310 OFAC.

The term *OFAC* means the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.

[89 FR 15748, Mar. 5, 2024]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. T E R R Y B R AY , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 50032 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 6 8 5 - A BC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A udr e yB . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T e rryB r ayappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on for ase nt ence re du ct i on un der 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 2(c) (2). W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o w h e th e rad is tr ic t c o u rt h a s ju r is d ic tio n to 

# FI LED DE C 31 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 50032 2 m o d if yas e n te n c e u n d e rs e c tio n 3 5 8 2 . Se e U ni te d States v . W

es s on , 583 F . 3d 728, 7 3 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e a f f i rm. B r ayc ont e nds tha the i s e l i gi bl e f oras e nt e nc e r e duc t i on unde rA m e ndm e nt 75 0, w hi ch am ended the drug qu ant i ty t abl e i n U . S . S . G . § 2 D 1. 1 for offense s i nv ol vi ng cr ac k cocai ne. H ow ever , B ray w as se nt ence d as acare eroffe nd er pur s uantt o U . S . S . G . § 4B 1. 1. T he r e f or e , hi s s e nt e nc e w a s notba s e d on a G u id e lin e s r an g e th a t h a s b e e n lo w e r e d , an dth e d is tr ic t c o u rt la c k e dju r is d ic tio n to m o d if yh is s e n te n c e . See 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) ; W es s on , 583 F . 3d a t731- 32. AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      3,686,931
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     13,176,570 
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                50,386,257
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                   745,057,491
<ALLOWANCE>                                 4,540,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            845,438,085
<DEPOSITS>                                560,353,267
<SHORT-TERM>                               60,358,932
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        16,208,461
<LONG-TERM>                               144,071,811
<COMMON>                                   48,460,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 15,984,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            845,438,085
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            14,196,567
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             942,443
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              320,181
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           15,459,191
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          6,035,135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9,115,767
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       6,343,424
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (51,031)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             3,919,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,055,211
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  4,055,211
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,795,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                 1,052,539
<LOANS-PAST>                                   19,189
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               937,206
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            4,566,475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 130,800
<RECOVERIES>                                   14,632
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           4,540,307
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        4,089,266
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       451,041
        

</TABLE>