alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00425-CV

MARICELA G. MORALES, LEONEL MORALES, 

AND FIDEL MORALES, INDIVIDUALLY, AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF INNOCENCIO MORALES, DECEASED,

Appellants

v.

NAVARRO PECAN COMPANY, INC.,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D12-21707-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Maricela G. Morales, Leonel Morales, and Fidel Morales, 

Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Innocencio Morales, Deceased, 

and on behalf of all wrongful death beneficiaries appealed the trial court’s final 

judgment rendered against them. Appellants have now filed a motion to dismiss the 
Morales v. Navarro Pecan Company, Inc. Page 2

appeal stating that the parties reached an agreement during mediation. Appellee is 

unopposed to this motion.

Accordingly, appellants’ motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 28, 2014

[CV06]
#### § 590.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
#### PURPLE PICKLE, INC., Appellant, v. DICK DOTY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-1353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# IH«KM«f

COA# 02-13-00402-CR OFFENSE: 2 Rolando Bosquez v.The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant TRIAL COURT: 371st District Court COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED DATE: 09/25/14 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 1331026D



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Rolando Bosquez v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

## APPELLANT^ FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# date: fzliyUoN JUDGE: 

## A^fL6(AA4l>*^— Petition CCA#: 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### JOHN D. FORD v. THE UNITED STATES. WILLIAM W. WHITE v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 239 U. S. R. 608.]

*On the Plaintiffs’ appeals.*

No opinion was delivered by the court below, but judgment was rendered for the defendants. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

The act of March 4, 1913, c. 148, 37 Stat. 891, granting officers of the Navy who had been advanced in rank the pay and allowances of the higher rank, applies only to officers on the active list and does not apply to officers on the retired list who were assigned for active service after their retirement.

In construing a statute the court will regard it as more rational to assume that Congress was dealing with present affairs than that it was reopening finished transactions.

The general rule of statutes relating to duty and pay of naval officers is found in Rev. Stat., sec. 1462, providing that no officer on the retired list shall be employed in active duty except in time of war.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 17, 1916.
#### § 590.310 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulations to Department of State Employees Named as 2023 Service to America Medal Finalists

# 									Congratulations to Department of State Employees Named as 2023 Service to America Medal Finalists							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 8, 2023

The Director General is pleased to announce that Mr. Fletcher Schoen and Ms. Jennifer Harkins of the Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs have been named as finalists for the 2023 Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals. The Service to America Medals program honors the achievements of federal employees making significant contributions to the U.S. government.

Mr. Schoen and Ms. Harkins are being honored for their efforts in the release of 11 wrongfully detained Americans held in Russia and Venezuela, contributing to creative diplomatic strategies and delicate negotiations while showing compassion to the families and keeping them informed.

The Partnership for Public Service will recognize the seven recipients of 2023 Service to America Medals, including the Federal Employee of the Year, this fall. Please visit the Service to America Medals website for more information.

The Service to America Medals program was established in 2002 by the Partnership for Public Service, a non-partisan, non-profit organization.

Tags

Hostage RecoveryOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 10.4.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
​
C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Restated Effective January 1, 2018)
​
Pursuant to subparagraph 14.1(b), the Administrator hereby adopts the following amendment to the Virginia Bankers Association Model Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives) (the companion document to the Adoption Agreement for the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for C&F Financial Corporation):
​
1.A new subparagraph 9.4(d) is added to the Plan to clarify payment rules if death occurs after commencement of periodic installment, to read as follows effective as of January 1, 2018: 
​
9.4(d)In the event that a Participant who has begun to receive periodic installment payments dies, the amounts of any periodic installments remaining unpaid shall be paid to his Beneficiary over the remaining term certain for such installments. 
​
This First Amendment is adopted by the Plan Sponsor as Administrator on this 1st day of January, 2018.  
​
________________________________________
 ​
Plan Sponsor 
​
​
By:​ ​Jason E. Long​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​(SEAL)
   Its​ ​SVP & CFO​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​

​
- 1 -
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Wilfred J. Corrigan, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LSI Logic Corporation on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of LSI Logic Corporation. By: /s/ WILFRED J. CORRIGANName: Wilfred J. CorriganTitle: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
RANDY BOATWRIGHT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2235

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed August 15, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

Randy Boatwright, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Murraydell JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. NN-218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 29, 1979.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender; and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Miguel A. Olivella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jones seeks reversal of his convictions for robbery and false imprisonment contending that the trial court erred by denying his motion for mistrial without conducting a full inquiry as mandated by *Richardson v. State,*246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), into the circumstances surrounding the state’s violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(a)(l)(iii). We agree and reverse.

In response to Jones’ written discovery demand, the state replied that Jones had made no written, recorded or oral statements. At trial, the state, over Jones’ objection and motion for mistrial, elicited testimony from the arresting officer concerning an oral statement made by Jones at the time of his arrest. The inquiry conducted by the trial court was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of *Richardson,*supra, since the circumstances establishing non-prejudice to Jones do not affirmatively appear in the record. Counsel’s knowledge of Jones’ statement prior to trial may well have affected defense tactics or may have afforded defense counsel an opportunity to refute or temper the prejudicial effect of the statement. Since the inquiry herein does not comply with the dictates of *Richardson,*supra, the cause must be reversed and remanded for a new trial. *Smith v. State, 372*So.2d 86 (Fla.1979).

McCORD, Acting C. J., SHIVERS, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
Cerprobe Corporation
                  Computation of Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share
                                   Exhibit 11
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                                           March 31,
                                                            ----------------------------------------
                                                                  1997                   1996
                                                            -----------------      -----------------
<S>                                                       <C>                    <C>               
Net income (loss)                                         $       (4,894,633)    $        1,006,221
                                                            =================      =================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                         6,292,662              4,152,588

Common equivalent shares:

  Shares issuable upon exercise
    of stock options (1)                                                   0                309,145

Convertible preferred stock                                                0                601,463
                                                            -----------------      -----------------

       Total weighted average shares-primary                       6,292,662              5,063,196
                                                            -----------------      -----------------


Fully diluted incremental shares:

  Stock options (calculated using the higher
    of end of period or average market value)                              0                  2,374

  Convertible subordinated debentures                                      0                579,779
                                                            -----------------      -----------------

       Total weighted average shares-fully diluted                 6,292,662              5,645,349
                                                            -----------------      -----------------


Primary net income per common and
  common equivalent share                                 $            (0.78)    $             0.20
                                                            -----------------      -----------------

Fully diluted net income per common and
  common equivalent share                                 $            (0.78)    $             0.18
                                                            -----------------      -----------------
</TABLE>
(1) Amount calculated under the treasury stock method and fair market values for
stock
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Condemnation of the Lukashenka Regime’s Raids on Former Political Prisoners

# 									Condemnation of the Lukashenka Regime’s Raids on Former Political Prisoners							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 25, 2024

The United States condemns the Lukashenka regime’s recent raids, detentions, and the regime’s broader ongoing attacks on human rights and attempts to thwart the democratic aspirations of the people of Belarus.  We will continue to hold the regime accountable, through sanctions and other means, for its harsh internal repression as well as for its ongoing support for Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

Tags

BelarusBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
ENCLOSURE D 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 

(IN CONFIDENTIAL FILE)
HomeEritrea

# Eritrea

62 items

        -    Media Note  		Travel by U.S. Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Jeffrey Feltman	  May 14, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Eritrea	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Travel of Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa to Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Sudan 	  May 3, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Tigray, Ethiopia	  April 2, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Eritrea	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Key Outcomes at the 46th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  March 24, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Eritrea	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Eritrea	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Eritrea	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Eritrea	  March 11, 2020 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Imaging Technologies Corporation, a
Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending
September  30,  2002  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"),  I,  Brian  Bonar,  Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002  (18  U.S.C.   1350),  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

Date:  December  17,  2002

/s/  Brian  Bonar
_______________________________
Brian  Bonar
Chief  Executive  Officer  and
Principal  Accounting  Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000702403
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         272,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               388,112
<PP&E>                                      39,738,952
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,583,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,896
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     452,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,573
<SALES>                                        458,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               472,730
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            268,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeGlobal Engagement Center...Global Engagement Center  Releases

# Global Engagement Center Releases

54 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy and Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center Rubin’s Travel to Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Belgium	  May 26, 2023 
        -    		Russia Must Stop Its Attacks on Food Security	  May 23, 2023 
        -    		Faces of Kremlin Propaganda: Maria Zakharova	  April 24, 2023 
        -    		Gendered Disinformation: Tactics, Themes, and Trends by Foreign Malign Actors	  March 27, 2023 
        -    		The Kremlin’s Never-Ending Attempt to Spread Disinformation about Biological Weapons	  March 14, 2023 
        -    Report  		Disinformation Roulette: The Kremlin’s Year of Lies to Justify an Unjustifiable War	  February 23, 2023 
        -    		James P. Rubin	  December 21, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Appointment of James P. Rubin as Special Envoy and Coordinator of the Global Engagement Center	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 16, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Targeting Russian Corruption in the Guatemalan Mining Sector	  Ned PriceNovember 18, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		Yevgeniy Prigozhin’s Africa-Wide Disinformation Campaign	  November 4, 2022 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
§ 562.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 562.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note to § 562.504 :
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See* also § 562.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
§ 591.510 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13850, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, involving Banco Central de Venezuela, or E.O. 13884 involving the Government of Venezuela, that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( a ) Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF)
( b ) Fondo Latinoamericano de Reservas
( c ) Inter-American Development Bank
( d ) International Committee of the Red Cross
( e ) International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
( f ) Organization of American States, and its specialized organizations, other autonomous and decentralized organs, agencies, entities, and dependencies
( g ) The World Bank Group (also referred to as the World Bank), including the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Development Association (IDA), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
( h ) United Nations, including its Programmes and Funds, and its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations, including those entities specifically listed separately below: ( 1 ) IMF (International Monetary Fund)
( 2 ) FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization)
( 3 ) IOM (International Organization for Migration)
( 4 ) OCHA (UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs)
( 5 ) OHCHR (UN Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights)
( 6 ) UN Habitat
( 7 ) UNDP (UN Development Program)
( 8 ) UNFPA (UN Population Fund)
( 9 ) UNHCR (Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees)
( 10 ) UNICEF (UN Children's Fund)
( 11 ) WFP (World Food Program)
( 12 ) The World Health Organization (WHO), including the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO)
[87 FR 78480, Dec. 21, 2022]
#### Tyrone ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. BELL, Jr., in his individual and official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2536.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.

Decided Feb. 27, 2001.

Tyrone Andrews, pro se..

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Andrews v. Bell,*No. CA-00-789-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*