alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 578.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 578.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 578.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
#### The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Pedro Pablo MARTINEZ, Respondent.

No. 79-1924.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 18, 1980.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1980.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty., and Kurt L. Marmar, Asst. State’s Atty., for petitioner.

John H. Lipinski, Miami, for respondent.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

A petition for writ of certiorari filed by the state presents for review an order of the circuit court requiring the state to disclose the identity of a confidential informant, in a prosecution against respondent for certain violations of Chapter 893 of the Florida Statutes. In light of the record, briefs and argument, we hold that the challenged order represents a departure from the essential requirements of law and must be quashed.

The transcript of testimony given at the hearing on respondent’s motion to compel disclosure of the confidential informant contains the recitation of events prior to the arrest of Martinez. The police officer heading up the instant narcotics investigation testified that he received a telephone call from an informant with whom he had established a beneficial working relationship over four to five years; the informant told the officer that a certain named Cuban male who owned and operated a named business at a given address would be leaving his place of business at a specified time *1184later that day and would drive to the residence of some Colombian subjects where he would receive a quantity of cocaine. The informant had given a full physical description of the person and the vehicle he would be driving. The police set up a surveillance pursuant to the information given by the informant, and each detail of the data given was thereafter corroborated by the police, and respondent was ultimately arrested (without warrant) while in possession of a kilogram of cocaine.

It has long been recognized in the federal courts and under the law of Florida that the state is not required to disclose the identity of a confidential informant who merely furnishes the probable cause basis for a search or an arrest. See, *McCray v. Illinois,*386 U.S. 300, 87 S.Ct. 1056, 18 L.Ed.2d 62, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474, 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967); *State v. Katz,*295 So.2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); *State v. Matney,*236 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); *Pearson v. State,*190 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So.2d 814 (Fla.1967); *Dasher v. State,*178 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); F.R.Cr.P. 3.220(c)(2).

Certiorari is granted and the order for disclosure of the identity of the informant is quashed.
#### H. H. BARGAR, Appellant, v. BANKERS MULTIPLE LINE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., an Iowa corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-828.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James McCauley, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeAssisted Schools...Barcelona, Spain: American School of Barcelona: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Barcelona, Spain: American School of Barcelona: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 22, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +34-93-371-4016 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: info@asbarcelona.com | Website: www.asbarcelona.com 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Barcelona-ASB-2024 Special Needs- Spain) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **American School of Barcelona**(ASB) is an international, independent, coeducational day school, which offers an educational program from prekindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities.  The school was founded in 1962.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

 

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsSpain

Back to Top
#### § 594.407 Offshore transactions.

The prohibitions in §§ 594.201 and 594.204 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property apply to transactions or dealings by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States with respect to property that the U.S. person knows, or has reason to know, is held in the name of a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201(a) or in which the U.S. person knows, or has reason to know, a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201(a) has or has had an interest since the effective date.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulations to Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum

# 									Congratulations to Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 2, 2021

The United States congratulates Nigerien President Mohamed Bazoum on his inauguration, marking an historic transfer of power from one democratically elected president to the next.  This is a significant milestone for Niger’s democracy.  We congratulate the Nigerien people on this achievement.

We value the strong relationship between the United States and Niger and look forward to working with President Bazoum’s administration to expand bilateral relations including in the areas of development, humanitarian assistance, security, and trade.

We remain concerned by the outbreak of violence that occurred in Niamey on March 31.  We condemn any attempt to undermine Niger’s democratically elected government and call on all Nigeriens to work together for the good of the Nigerien people.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDemocracyNigeriaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00787-CR

Emmanuel Grear, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-DC-15-204897, THE HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 10, 2019. On counsel’s 

motions, the time for filing was extended to June 24, 2019. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a 

third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the 

motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than August 8, 2019. No 

further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the 

referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on July 11, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Do Not Publish
#### Roy Frank CLEMENTS, alias, v. STATE.

7 Div. 575.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 17, 1979.

REVERSED AND REMANDED on authority of Supreme Court of Alabama ms. 77-643, 370 So.2d 723, as modified March 30, 1979. No opinion.

All the Judges concur.
t1N!°fED S'rATES ENV3RONMEN`rAl. PROTEC'tlON AGENCY 

~ e WASHiNG TON, D.C. 2046(} 

David C. Moody, PhD 

Manager, Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Dr. Moody: 

On July 12, 2007, the Environmental Proteetion Agency (EPA) received the 

Department of Energy's (DOE) "Transuranic (TRU) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) 

for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Revision 6.1, DOE/WIPP-02-3122" for review. 

EPA's review of Revision 6.1 of the WAC determined that this document 

contains few changes that are speeific to the characterization of the radioactive 

component of the waste. EPA does not need to concur in this doeument in order for it to 

be implemented by DOE. EPA determines the adequacy of the waste characterization 

process via inspections_ However, prior to disposal of "machine compacted remotehandled waste", EPA must receive further information. You state that you do not believe 

that this remote handled (RH) contains cellulosic, plastic, and rubber (CPR) material in 

excess of INL supercompacted waste. Please provide additional information (sueh as 

number of containers, waste volumes, CPR content, etc.) that compares the RH 

compacted waste and the INL supercompacted waste prior to disposal of this type of 

waste at the WIPP. 

EPA previously determined that the WAC contains significantly less detail 

on the characterization techniques used for remote-handled (RH) waste than on the 

techniques used for CH waste (A-98-49, II-B3-99). Because these differences remain 

in Revision 6.1 of the WAC, EPA continues to expect each RH site to develop its waste 

characterization plans based on the Waste Characterization Prob am Implementation Plan 

(WCPIP). 

Oil~ Reeyclecifflacyoiabis 

?~ S'ri:ned Wita $o€Y' ~s.rata k* ~ pw®r %b-€ 

~v.E pa?rs~irss s~ Sesa? §~ ~sY~a~ fiPaee 
Thank you for providing us with an opportrmity to review the Revision 6.1 

of the WAC. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Rajani Joglekar 

(202-343-9462) or Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422). 

'-~

Icerel ~~ • 1p 

 Juan Reyes, Dtrector 

Radiation Protection Division 

cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Lloyd Piper, CBFO 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

J. R. Stroble, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Allison, Pangle, CTAC 

Wayne Ledford, CTAC
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment...Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

# Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					To provide American leadership, diplomacy, and scientific cooperation to conserve and protect the global environment, ocean, and space for the prosperity, peace, and security of this and future generations.				

Acting Assistant Secretary

Jennifer R. Littlejohn

							Follow Us:																			FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrLinkedIn

## 											The Latest									

					December 28, 2023				

## 2023 in Review: A Year of Progress for Oceans, the Environment, and Science

		2023 was a year of real progress in protecting the ocean and environment and advocating for space and science cooperation.  In numerous multilateral fora and with partners in the United States and around the world, the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs helped lead the charge for a brighter and more hopeful […]

          -  April 11, 2024							U.S. Delegation to the Ninth Our Ocean Conference						   
          -  April 10, 2024							Signing of the U.S.-Japan Global Innovation through Science and Technology (GIST) Memorandum of Understanding						   
          -  April 8, 2024							Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to Spain and UN Ocean Decade Conference						   
See All

## Offices

            -  Office of Conservation and Water 
            -  Office of Environmental Quality 
            -  Office of Global Change 
            -  Office of Marine Conservation 
            -  Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs 
            -  Office of Policy and Public Outreach 
            -  Office of Science and Technology Cooperation 
            -  Office of Space Affairs 

Back to Top
#### § 578.408 Charitable contributions.

Unless specifically authorized by OFAC pursuant to this part, no charitable contribution of funds, goods, services, or technology, including contributions to relieve human suffering, such as food, clothing, or medicine, may be made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201. For the purposes of this part, a contribution is made by, to, or for the benefit of, or received from, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201 if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, such a person; if made by, to, or in the name of, or received from or in the name of, an entity or individual acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled by, such a person; or if made in an attempt to violate, to evade, or to avoid the bar on the provision of contributions by, to, or for the benefit of such a person, or the receipt of contributions from such a person.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         223,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,845
<INVENTORY>                                     63,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,912
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,178,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          837,012
<BONDS>                                        480,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    353,924
<COMMON>                                        81,783
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,425,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,178,576
<SALES>                                        322,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,465
<CGS>                                          120,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,030,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (65,397)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (911,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (911,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (911,56)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Belarus Independence Day

# 									Belarus Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 3, 2023

On the occasion of Belarus’ official Independence Day, the people of the United States of America send their warmest wishes to the people of Belarus.

Your courage, resilience, and perseverance in pursuing a democratic, sovereign, and stable future for Belarus have inspired the world.  From behind prison walls, in the cities in which you find yourselves in exile, and within your homes in Belarus, you continue to stand up and speak out for a truly independent and democratic future for your country, where you can live free of repression and where you will be able to determine the course of your own future.

The United States commends and supports your tireless efforts to champion Belarus’ unique language, culture, and identity.  We admire your perseverance in defending human rights and fundamental freedoms.  We call for the unconditional release of all of the more than 1,500 Belarusian political prisoners, and for an end to the ongoing repression in Belarus.

The United States has stood for a democratic, independent, and sovereign Belarus for more than 30 years.  That commitment remains unwavering.

Tags

BelarusBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Edward S. Hamilton *et al.,*as Executors &c. of Peter Townsend, Respondents, *against*Cassius H. Read *et al.,*Appellants.

(Decided February 1st, 1886).

During the term of a lease of real property at a monthly rental, the lessee made a lease of the premises for the unexpired term of the original lease at an advanced rental, and subsequently assigned all right, title and interest under such sub-lease to the landlord in chief. *Held,*that the assignment did not constitute a merger of the title, such as to bar a recovery by the landlord 'in chief against sureties upon the original lease for rent subsequently accruing under it.

Appeal from a judgment of this court entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought against sureties upon a lease, to recover rent accruing under the lease.

*437The plaintiffs’ testator, Peter Townsend, owned the premises known as No. 129 Fifth Avenue, in the City of New York, and by a lease dated April 19th, 1881, demised the same to Mary A. Kieff until May 1st, 1883, at a monthly rental of $250.

On August 25th, 1882, Kieff executed a lease of the premises to L. Carpenter Cocks, for the unexpired term of the lease at a rental of $525 a month. On December 14th, 1882, Kieff assigned to Townsend all her right, title and interest under her lease of August 25th, 1882.

This action is brought against the defendants as sureties for Kieff upon the original lease for the rent accruing April 1st, 1883.

As appears by the record, the liability of the defendants has been established in previous actions upon the lease in question (see *ante,*p. 198). The main defense now interposed is that the assignment to Townsend of December 14th, 1882, constituted a merger of the title, and is a bar to plaintiffs’ right of recovery.

Upon trial before a referee, he found in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment for plaintiffs was entered upon his report. From the judgment defendants appealed.

*Christopher Fine,*for appellants.

*I. T. Williams,*for respondents.

Larremore, Ch. J.

[After stating the facts as above].— The plea of merger cannot be sustained. It is not favored in law, and rests mainly upon the intention of the parties.

The assignment of December 14th, 1882, created a new estate at an advanced rent, and the assignee of such estate was entitled to its benefits *(Gansen*v. *Tifft,*71 N. Y. 48). While the lease to Kieff was outstanding the sureties upon it were liable according to its terms. Townsend must be simply regarded as a party subrogated in interest to Kieff, and the fact that he was the owner in fee could not *438deprive him of the rights acquired by the assignment of December 14th, 1882.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Allen and Bookstaveb, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
A L O N S I C H E R M A N w o u l d l i k e t o a m e n d h i s S e c t i o n 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n

, n u m b e r e d 1 1 7 2 8

. A L O N

S I C H E R M A N h a s f

o r m e d L

­ V I S I O N L L C a n d w o u l d l i k e t o t r a n s f e r t h e r i g h t s g r a n t e d b y h i s

S e c t i o n 3 3 3 a m e n d m e n t t o h i s n e w L L C

. A L O N S I C H E R M A N i s t h e s o l e m e m b e r o f t h e

L

­ V I S I O N L L C

, s o t h e r e a r e n o c h a n g e s t o t h e s t r u c t u r e o f t h e o r i g i n a l a p p l i c a t i o n

.

A L O N S I C H E R M A N h a s a l s o m a d e m o d i f i c a t i o n s t o h i s c l o s e d s e t M P T O M a n d h a s s u b m i t t e d

t h e u p d a t e d m a n u a l f

o r r e v i e w

.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

 

1See Highlands Ins.. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins.. Co., 27 F.3d 1027 (5th Cir. 1994)

(applying in a civil case, plain error analysis of United States v. Olano, 113 S.Ct. 1770

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60173

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EARNEST CONROD, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

(CR-90-156-D)

March 5, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Earnest Conrod, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, contending that his counsel did

not provide effective assistance because of an ongoing feud with the Assistant United States

Attorney. This issue was not raised in the trial court and Conrod has not shown the requisite

plain error.1
(1993)), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 903 (1995).

 

2Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984).

2

Conrod also contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to call alibi

witnesses. This claim fails because Conrod has not “overcome the presumption that, under

the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’”2

AFFIRMED.