alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          121765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2036818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2158583
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2158583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8221
<BONDS>                                         138889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2011473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2158583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                375000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 24388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               24857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 325755
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             325755
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    325755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $81.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|   | Exhibit      21 |
|--------|-----------------|

| Name                                               |   |         |   | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Harleysville      National Bank and Trust Company. |   | Pennsylvania |
| Cornerstone      Advisors Asset Management, Inc.   |   | Pennsylvania |
| Cornerstone      Financial Consultants, Ltd.       |   | Pennsylvania |
| Cornerstone      Institutional Investors, Inc.     |   | Pennsylvania |
| HNC      Insurance Agency, Inc                     |   | Pennsylvania |
| Harleysville      Management Services, LLC         |   | Pennsylvania |
| East      Penn Mortgage Company                    |   | Pennsylvania |
| East      Penn Mortgage Company LLC                |   | Pennsylvania |
| BeneServ,      Inc.                                |   | Pennsylvania |
| Willow      Grove Investment Corporation.          |   | Delaware     |
| D      and S Service Corporation.                  |   | Pennsylvania |
| D      & F Projects, Inc.                      |   | Pennsylvania |
| Wildman      Projects, Inc..                       |   | Pennsylvania |
| HNC      Financial Company                         |   | Delaware     |
| HNC      Reinsurance Company                       |   | Arizona      |
| Harleysville      Statutory Trust I                |   | Connecticut  |
| HNC      Statutory Trust II                        |   | Delaware     |
| HNC      Statutory Trust III                       |   | Delaware     |
| HNC      Statutory Trust IV                        |   | Delaware     |
| East      Penn Statutory Trust I                   |   | Connecticut  |
| Willow      Grove Statutory Trust I                |   | Connecticut  |
| Texture, Carbonate Content, and Preliminary   Maps of Surficial Sediments, Flower Garden Banks Area, Northwest Gulf   of Mexico Outer Shelf, USGS Open-File Report 03-002Home  / Contents / Introduction /Setting /Methods / Previous Work / Discussion / Conclusions / Acknowledgments / ReferencesAppendices:I. Field Report	 	 / II. Sediment Analysis	 /  III. Table / Graphic  / IV. Figures / V. Fig. Summary / VI. GIS/MetadataTable of Contents**README****- Important CD-ROM and Open-File Report Information****I.  Introduction****II.  Setting****III.  Methods****IV.  Previous       Work****V.  Discussion       of Data****VI.  Conclusions****VII.  Acknowledgements****VIII.  References       Cited****Appendix I - Field       Activity Report****Appendix II - Sediment       Texture Analysis****Appendix III - Station Index (Table)(Graphic)****Appendix IV - FGB       Figures****Appendix V - FGB       Figure Summary****Appendix VI - Arcview Project  & Gis Data**
**Contact Information   & Links**

**U.S. Geological SurveyWoods Hole Field Center384 Woods Hole Rd. Woods Hole, MA 02543 http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 34.17

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Torchlight Loan Services, LLC

We have examined management of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC ("Torchlight")'s assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions that were issued on or after December 1, 2002 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 for which Torchlight acted as the special servicer listed in Appendix B ("Platform") included in the accompanying Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Torchlight's management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Torchlight's compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Management has determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by Torchlight as a special servicer with respect to Torchlight's Platform.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management's assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management's assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Torchlight's compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the SEC's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions that were issued on or after December 1, 2002 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 for which Torchlight acted as the special servicer included in the accompanying Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda, Maryland 

February 19, 2020
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Financial Trust Corp of our report dated March 1, 1996, included in the 1995
Annual Report to Shareholders of Financial Trust Corp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-54852 and Form S-8 No. 33-57494) of our report dated March 1,
1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Financial Trust
Corp incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1995.

                                     Ernst & Young LLP




Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

March 22, 1996
HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Bureau of Political Military Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Releases

		Follow Us		

338 items

        -    		Leadership – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs	   
        -    Report  		To Walk the Earth in Safety (2018)	  December 18, 2018 
        -    		Contact Us – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs	   
        -    		Violation of Arms Transfer and Third Party Transfer Law and Policy	   
        -    		Conventional Arms Transfer Policy	  December 17, 2018 
        -    		Legal Basis for Arms Transfers	   
        -    		Third Party Transfer Process and Documentation	   
        -    		Key Topics – Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfers	   
        -    		Key Topics – Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement	   
        -    		About Us – Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement	   

previous page1…3031323334next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Australia Commits to the Clean Energy Demand Initiative’s Goals with Corporate Partners

# 									Australia Commits to the Clean Energy Demand Initiative’s Goals with Corporate Partners							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 22, 2022

Today in Pittsburgh, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry joined the Government of Australia as it signed a Letter of Intent between the Australian government, represented by Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen, and nine companies – Akamai, Amazon, Cisco, Google, Iron Mountain, Lululemon, PepsiCo, Salesforce, and Unilever – to support the clean energy transition by working to procure clean energy in Australia and around the world.  Together, these companies seek to unlock between $2.2-$2.8 billion in Australia’s clean energy infrastructure arising from commercial and industrial sector operations, working together with the Australian government as part of the Clean Energy Demand Initiative (CEDI).  Many of these firms are already working with their supply chain partners in Australia and confirm the desire to support their suppliers with clean energy procurement as more options become available.

CEDI serves as a platform for stakeholder engagement and country partnerships and creates a venue for companies and countries to signal investment potential in clean energy, share experiences, and support each other on policy reform that contributes to affordable and resilient energy systems that drive economic growth.  Globally through CEDI, 75 interested private sector partners, representing a wide range of sectors, including technology, manufacturing, retail, and health, have indicated interest in unlocking up to $100 billion in clean energy infrastructure across 14 countries, as a complement to broader sectoral investment.

The experience and expertise of Australia’s regulators, utilities, and private sector, and the Australian government’s active engagement on regional energy security, will be valuable additions to CEDI’s efforts around the world.  Australia’s policy actions – including large-scale generation credits, corporate power purchase agreements (PPAs), and renewable retail contracts – may serve as a model for other countries working to expand corporate procurement of renewable energy.  Australia is a committed partner of the United States in efforts to unlock these markets globally, and its participation in the CEDI platform will help institutionalize and amplify its expertise.

Today, Australia and corporate partners have clearly signaled their support for key principles to enable corporate renewable procurement, lending considerable weight to the ongoing effort to ramp up clean energy deployment and accelerate the energy transition in support of global climate goals.

A fact sheet on CEDI is available here.

For further media information, contact ENR-PD-clearances@state.gov.

Tags

AustraliaBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBusinessEnergyOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 570.701 Penalties. ( a ) Section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) (IEEPA) is applicable to violations of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, directive, or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under IEEPA. ( 1 ) A civil penalty not to exceed the amount set forth in section 206 of IEEPA may be imposed on any person who violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition issued under IEEPA.
( 2 ) IEEPA provides for a maximum civil penalty not to exceed the greater of $368,136 or an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed.
( 3 ) A person who willfully commits, willfully attempts to commit, willfully conspires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of a violation of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition may, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a natural person, be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both.
( b ) ( 1 ) The civil penalties provided in IEEPA are subject to adjustment pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-410, as amended, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note).
( 2 ) The criminal penalties provided in IEEPA are subject to adjustment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3571.
( c ) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned, or both.
( d ) Section 5(b) of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c(b)) (UNPA), provides that any person who willfully violates or evades or attempts to violate or evade any order, rule, or regulation issued by the President pursuant to section 5(a) of the UNPA shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000 and, if a natural person, may also be imprisoned for not more than 20 years.
( e ) Violations involving transactions described at section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA shall be subject only to the penalties set forth in paragraph (d) of this section.
( f ) Violations of this part may also be subject to other applicable laws.
[87 FR 59678, Oct. 3, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 2233, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 2143, Jan. 12, 2024]
40707.

#### STRICKLAND v. HALL.

Decided May 18, 1964

Rehearing denied June 9, 1964.

*Oze Horton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hicks & Howard, G. Robert Howard,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in *Northside Manor, Inc. v. Vann,*219 Ga. 298 (133 SE2d 32), under the Act *of*1952 (Ga. L. 1952, pp. 243, 245), amending *Code*§ 81-1001, in so far as the judgment ruling upon the defendant’s demurrers was concerned, only the final judg*823ment sustaining the defendant’s general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition would have been reviewable. However, under such decision the law enunciated in the decisions prior to the 1952 amendment which hold such preliminary judgments to constitute the law of the case under certain circumstances is applicable. See also *Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. Christian,*109 Ga. App. 818.

The first ruling on the defendant’s demurrers sustained certain special demurrers and overruled the general demurrer and allowed the plaintiff thirty days to amend. The plaintiff amended but did not correct all the deficiencies required by the rulings on the special demurrers. If such amendment was not a material amendment then, under the decisions exemplified by *Baker v. City of Atlanta,*22 Ga. App. 483 (96 SE 332), the amendment not meeting all grounds of special demurrers, the trial court’s judgment dismissing the case was not error. However, if such amendment was a material amendment the petition was again subject to demurrer and the second order on the demurrers became the law of the case (See *Green v. Spires,*189 Ga. 719, 721, 7 SE2d 246; *Darling Stores Corp. v. Wm. Beatus, Inc.,*197 Ga. 125, 28 SE2d 124), and the second amendment, being at most a restatement of the allegations already in the petition, not meeting the objections raised by the demurrers previously sustained, the petition was properly dismissed.

2. In view of the above ruling the trial court properly overruled the motion to quash the defendant’s demurrers to the petition as finally amended, and the question presented by the plaintiff’s demurrers to the defendant’s answer is nugatory.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Russell, JJ., concur.*
40584.

#### TROUP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS v. PUBLIC FINANCE CORPORATION.

Decided April 7, 1964.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. Where a county is the garnishee under *Code Ann. Ch.*46-8, a valid judgment cannot be entered against the governmental unit without its consent as - specifically provided for in *Code Ann.*§ 46-805. *Redwine v. Morgan,*88 Ga. App. 625 (77 SE2d 330). Hence any judgment entered without consent is void.

“ ‘A “void” judgment is in reality no judgment at all. It is a mere nullity. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication, nor is it entitled to the respect accorded to one. It can neither affect, impair, nor create rights. As to the person against whom it professes to be -rendered, it binds him in no degree whatever,- it has no effect as a lien upon his property, it does not raise an estoppel against him. As to the person in whose favor it professes to be, it places him in no better position than he occupied before; it gives him no new right, but an attempt to enforce it-will-place him in peril.’ 1 Black on Judgments 248, § 170. When this court discovers from the record that a judgment- brought here for review is void for any reason, it -will of its own motion reverse it.” *Adams v. Payne,*219 Ga. 638, 639 (135 SE2d 423).

2. A void judgment may be attacked in any court and by any person. *Code*§ 110-701. “ [A] judgment really void can not be vitalized by any subsequent action of the parties.” *Owens v. Cocroft,*14 Ga. App. 322, 324 (80 SE 906). Consequently, a void judgment under *Code Ann.*§ 46-805 could not be vitalized by the fact that a previous motion- to set aside was overruled by the trial judge and no exception was -taken - by the county. The sustaining of a general demurrer to the petition to set the judgment aside was error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and*Jordan,- J., *concur.*

*548
      *Trotter & Duncan, Thurman E. Duncan,*for plaintiff in error.

*James E. Weldon, E. W. Fleming,*contra.
#### § 0.201 Acting within scope of authority.

An employee shall not engage in any conduct or activity that is in excess of his or her authority or is otherwise contrary to any law, regulation, or Department policy.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Conventional Arms Threat Reduction

# Office of Conventional Arms Threat Reduction

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Conventional Arms Threat Reduction leads efforts to prevent the proliferation of destabilizing conventional weapons and advanced technologies, including through interdiction and by leading U.S. participation in the Wassenaar Arrangement. CATR also leads on export controls to protect the use of dual-use goods—including semiconductors—and prevent their use in ways that harm national security or abuse human rights.				

Back to Top