alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MICHAEL L. WAGNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 22-2571 (UNA)

)

UNITED STATES SOLICITOR GENERAL, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 

pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 

pauperis (ECF No. 3) and for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the complaint (ECF No. 

1) and this civil action without prejudice. 

A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a 

formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro 

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s 

jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled 

to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The 

purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim 

being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense, and to 

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 

(D.D.C. 1977). 
2

As drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in 

Rule 8(a). According to plaintiff, antibacterial soaps and chemicals in disposable diapers are 

toxic, and he demands that this Court “Order a Total-Ban of Antibacterial Soap and Disposable 

Diapers containing dangerous chemicals.” Compl. at 1. Missing from the complaint is a short 

and plain statement of a viable legal claim for relief this Court may order. Therefore, the Court 

will dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: January 19, 2023 /s/

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 17: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 17: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 17 [485 KB]

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
HomeCameroon

# Cameroon

70 items

        -    Press Statement  		Cameroon National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 20, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Cameroon	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Foreign Minister Le Drian	  May 4, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Cameroon	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Chad, Cameroon, and Southeast Nigeria	  February 17, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY20 DRL Security and Human Rights Request for Statements of Interest: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Mali, Nigeria	  December 2, 2020 
        -    		Five New Assisted Schools in 2020-2021	  November 2, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 26, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Cameroon	  September 8, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Cameroon	  June 25, 2020 

previous page1234567next page

Back to Top
#### § 591.401 [Reserved]
# Barbados

		Subscribe		

63 items

        -    		Barbados	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Caribbean Basin Security Initiative: Barbados	   
        -    		Caribbean Basin Security Initiative	   
        -    Report  		Barbados	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Barbados	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00591

- CR

The State of Texas v. Alfonso Longoria
On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 13

- CR

- 2376

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause
remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We fu rther order this decision certified below for observance. Decmeber 30, 2014
#### § 561.317 Money service businesses.

The term *money service* *businesses* means any agent, agency, branch, or office of any person doing business, whether or not on a regular basis or as an organized business concern, in one or more of the capacities listed in 31 CFR 103.11(uu)(1) through (5). The term does not include a bank or a person registered with, and regulated or examined by, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
§ 578.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201; or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201, also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201.
Exhibit 35.13 LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of June 1, 2017 by and among
CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations
Reviewer, Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian relating to the CFCRE 2017-C8 Mortgage Trust,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (CFCRE 2017-C8) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the
following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,
2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:

/s/ Adam Singer





Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alfred MIMITTE v. Hon. Ossie BROWN, District Attorney, 19th Judicial District Court.

No. 65624.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Alfred Mimitte, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of East Baton Rouge. Number unknown.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 167 (Monday, August 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44846-44847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health


Decision To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
for the Metals and Controls Corporation in Attleboro, MA, To Be 
Included in the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision 
to

[[Page 44847]]

evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees for the Metals 
and Controls Corporation in Attleboro, Massachusetts, to be included in 
the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational 
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed 
definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as 
warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: Metals and Controls Corporation.
    Location: Attleboro, Massachusetts.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All Atomic Weapons Employer employees 
who were exposed to thorium.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1952 through December 31, 1967.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56191517051615121578111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="115e525042515255523f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

 Christine M. Branche,
 Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health.
[FR Doc. E9-20899 Filed 8-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Djibouti

62 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Djibouti	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Djibouti	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Djibouti	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Djibouti National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 27, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Djibouti	  June 25, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Djibouti	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Djibouti Presidential Elections	  Ned PriceApril 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Djibouti	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Investment Climate Statements: Djibouti	  September 8, 2020 
        -    		Houssein Ismael Houssein	  August 26, 2020 

previous page1234567next page

Back to Top
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #17, Apr 30 – May 6, 2008

From October 1, 2007 to April 10, 2008, a widespread 

area of Afghanistan has received below normal 

precipitation. The USGS analysis indicates that 

precipitation deficits exceed 200 mm in the eastcentral parts of Afghanistan. During late February 

and March, above normal temperatures have 

resulted in an early melt of a below normal snow 

pack. Snow rapidly melted away from the central 

highlands, four to six weeks earlier than normal, but 

snow has accumulated since the beginning of April. 

The lack of winter precipitation coupled with an early 

snow melt may result in a lack of adequate water 

resource. During the next week, mostly dry weather 

will be accompanied by above normal 

temperatures. Snow that has recently accumulated 

in the central highlands will likely melt away with the 

warmer temperatures. Extreme heat (maximum 

temperatures above 38 °C ) will likely affect parts of 

the lowlands of Afghanistan. 

1) A widespread area of Afghanistan has experienced below normal precipitation during the

winter and an early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures above 38 °C will affect the southwest and north-central

parts of Afghanistan.

Figure 2. Accumulated liquid precipitation forecast, in 

mm, April 23 – 29, 2008 

Figure 3. Approximate snow depth in cm, April 19, 2008 

Source: NOAA Source: NOAA 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00442-CR

Michael Anthony Cardiel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 76553, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Michael Anthony Cardiel seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction

for evading arrest or detention with a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04.

Rule 26.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appeal is

perfected in a criminal case when notice of appeal is filed within 30 days after the day sentence is

imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(1). Compliance with Rule 26—the timely filing of a notice of appeal—is essential to vest

this Court with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

In this case, the trial court imposed sentence on November 9, 2017. No motion for

new trial was filed. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore December 11, 2017. See Tex.

R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 21, 2018. Thus, appellant’s
notice of appeal—filed 224 days after sentence was imposed—is untimely. Absent a timely filed

notice of appeal, we do not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case

and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton,

981 S.W.2d at 210.

Furthermore, the trial court has certified that: (1) this is a plea bargain case and

appellant has no right of appeal, and (2) appellant waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). We are required to dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a

right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State,

154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, for the above reasons, we dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 13, 2016

Do Not Publish

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                   ADRIEN ARPEL, INC., (Formerly Alfin, Inc.)
                         10QSB For the six months ended
                             January 31, 1999 & 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000724989
<NAME>                          ADRIEN ARPEL, INC., (Formerly Alfin, Inc.)
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           160,494
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    138,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,061,245
<INVENTORY>                                    1,670,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,013,329
<PP&E>                                         1,619,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,449,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,268,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,200,881
<BONDS>                                          622,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            750,000
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         145,250
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,327,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,268,803
<SALES>                                        3,800,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,800,034
<CGS>                                          1,091,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,371,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  60,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                56,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,780,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,780,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,780,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
ex10_2.htm



Exhibit 10.2




 




	


	
 


MAXCLEAN HOLDINGS LTD.


88 Yu Feng Road, Shuo Fang Town, New District, Wuxi,


Jiangsu, P.R. China


Telephone: +86 510 8526 1996


www.maxclean.com












Mr. Wu Xin Hui (Chinese Omitted)







Present







Date: August 1, 2012







Dear Mr. Wu,







APPOINTMENT LETTER







It is our pleasure to appoint you to the following post.







Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer


 


Report to: Mr. Wong Siu Hong, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)







Key Responsibilities including but not limited to:








	
1.

	
Ensure the financial activities, recordings and reports of the company including its subsidiaries (hereinafter called COMPANY) are proper for the purposes of the COMPANY and in compliance with the related statutory requirements








	
2. 

	
Manage the direct and indirect subordinates.








	
3. 

	
Financial planning and budgetary control








	
4. 

	
Work with other department managers to achieve the COMPANY's objectives.








	
5. 

	
Assist the CEO to achieve his business goals including the company listing.












Salary: Will be paid monthly of RMB 12,000.00







Effective Date: August 1, 2012







Your employment with Maxclean Holdings Ltd. is at-will and either party can terminate the relationship with 1 month notice which cannot be replaced by leave accrued.







Please sign to confirm your acceptance.







Date: August 1,    2012


Signature:













	
/s/ Wong Siu Hong

	  	
/s/ Wu Xin Hui


	
Mr. Wong Siu Hong

	  	
Mr. Wu Xin Hui
----

----

III Powiadomienia

Komisja

----

WSPÓLNOTOWY URZĄD ODMIAN ROŚLIN

Zaproszenie do wyrażania zainteresowania powołaniem na przewodniczącego komisji odwoławczej oraz na jego zastępcę

(2006/C 301 A/01)

Wspólnotowy Urząd Odmian Roślin poszukuje kandydatów na stanowisko przewodniczącego komisji odwoławczej oraz jego zastępcy.

Kandydaci muszą posiadać obywatelstwo jednego z państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej.

Przewodniczący komisji odwoławczej oraz jego zastępca są powoływani przez Radę na podstawie listy kandydatów przedstawianej przez Komisję po zasięgnięciu opinii Rady Administracyjnej Urzędu. Informacji w sprawie wynagrodzenia udziela na wniosek sekretariat komisji odwoławczej (Community Plant Variety Office, 3 boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02, Francja). Wspólnotowy Urząd Odmian Roślin oraz Komisja prowadzą politykę równych szans.

Zakres obowiązków, formularze zgłoszeniowe oraz instrukcje dotyczące składania podań można znaleźć w Internecie pod następującym adresem:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

lub

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Termin przyjmowania podań upływa dnia 31 stycznia 2007 r. (szczegółowe informacje znajdują się w instrukcjach do podań).

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7811

MICHAEL RANKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS ROWLAND; MICHAEL A. MUNNS; RICHARD T. JONES; BOBBY MONTAGUE; EARNEST SUTTON; J. A. REID; JOHN DOE, Maintenance Supervisor; JOHN DOE, Health Authority; SHARON SNIDER; NURSE CRAIG; JOHN DOE, Classification Officials, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-621-FL-5) Submitted: June 2, 2006 Decided: June 27, 2006 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Rankins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 We grant Rankins’ motion to reconsider and grant him leave to proceed under the PLRA in this appeal. Even though he has accumulated three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), construing his allegations as true, we conclude he made a colorable showing he was in “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” We express no opinion, however, as to the merits of his claims. We deny Rankins’ motion to reconsider our denial of his request for a stay.
2 The denial of a temporary restraining order is generally not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Rankins appealed the district court’s order that denied his motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1Rankins alleged a poor ventilation system in the unit in which he was housed at Butner Correctional Facility (“Butner”) caused him bodily harm, that he was denied medical treatment for his symptoms, and that he was denied outdoor recreation. The district court directed Rankins to particularize his claims within twenty days and denied his requests for injunctive relief and a temporary restraining order. We dismiss the appeal. Rankins has been transferred from Butner to Central Prison in Raleigh, North Carolina, so his requests for a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief are now moot, and we dismiss his appeal as to the denial of injunctive relief for that reason. 2 To the extent that Rankins appeals the disposition of his § 1983 claims, his appeal is interlocutory because the district court’s order is not a final disposition of those claims. We- 3 - dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions of the parties are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED