alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 30, 2009, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASN/JES & 
Co., Tucson, AZ; Cambridge Assessment, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 
Hughes Network Systems, Germantown, MD; Iowa Community College Online 
Consortium (ICCOC), W. Burlington, IA; New Publishing Solutions, 
Sparta, NJ; Ubion Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea; and University 
of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom have been added as parties to this 
venture. Also, Editure, Education Technology Division, North Melbourne, 
Victoria, Australia has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 16, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 21, 2009 (74 FR 23884).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-19885 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Skip navigation links
| welcome | visitor opportunities | refuge management | wildlife | bird viewing arearefuge maps & virtual tour | federal lands passes | volunteers | contact info | home |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                       | Map and Virtual Tourwelcome | visitor opportunities | refuge management | wildlife | bird viewing arearefuge maps & virtual tour | federal lands passes | contact info | home
*U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service* |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              17,069
<SECURITIES>                                       168,225
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         10,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   204,082
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     209,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              131,272
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        10,683,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,135,588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       209,754
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       52,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (44,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         487
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (44,222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
HomeDubai Regional Media Hub...Dubai Regional Media Hub  Releases

# Dubai Regional Media Hub Releases

43 items

        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Special Briefing via Telephone with Timothy Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingMay 20, 2021 
        -    		Dubai Regional Media Hub	  January 20, 2021 
        -    		Erica Chiusano	  June 15, 2019 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 22 , 202 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 2

- 00 5 1 8

- CV

TRACEY UBANII , Appellant

V.

NEXPOINT HICKORY LEA SE CO, LLC DBA HICKO RY CREEK RANCH , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 2022

- 01359

- JP

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a final judgment signed June 6, 20 22 . The clerk’s record
was filed July 25 , 20 22

. On September 15, 2022, the court reporter indicated that appellant has not paid for the reporter’s record, submitted an order for a free reporter’s record, or submitted a request for preparation and/or a written designation
for the record. No brief was fi led.

On October 6 , 20 22 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant2

filed a brief on or before November 7, 2022, the appeal was subject to dismissal
without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).
Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CertificationsPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Marcel Martin, the Vice President Finance andChief Financial Officer of Haynes International, Inc., certify that (i) thequarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Haynes International, Inc.as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

 
| * * | /s/  Marcel Martin           |
|----------|------------------------------|
|     | Marcel  Martin               |
|     | *Vice President Finance and* |
|     | *Chief Financial Officer*    |
|     | * *                     |
|     | August 6, 2008          |
|     | Date                         |

 

 

I, Francis J. Petro, the President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Haynes International, Inc., certify that (i) thequarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Haynes International, Inc.as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

 
| * * | /s/  Francis J. Petro                   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|     | Francis  J. Petro                       |
|     | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|     | * *                                |
|     | August 6, 2008                     |
|     | Date                                    |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2020

No. 04-19-00332-CV

Lee B. WHEELER, Trustee of the L& P Children's Trust and Nancy Wheeler Plumlee,

Appellants

v.

San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.,

Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-17-0027-CV-A

Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s third motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s 

brief is due January 31, 2020. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extenuating 

circumstances.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
AAM-12-410-E June 20, 2012

Exemption No. 10562 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0584

Mr. Aaron Singer

President San Francisco Seaplane Tours 242 Redwood Highway Mill Valley, CA 94941

Dear Mr. Singer:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of San Francisco Seaplane Tours (SFST) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow SFST to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SFST.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant San Francisco Seaplane Tours an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow SFST to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of SFST are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the SFST part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/S/
James R Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
#### § 579.314 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or other extensions of credit, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
§ 560.414 Reexportation of certain U.S.-origin goods exported prior to May 7, 1995. The prohibitions on reexportation in § 560.205 do not apply to United States-origin goods or technology that were exported from the United States prior to 12:01 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, May 7, 1995, if: ( a ) Such goods or technology were not the property of a United States person as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, May 7, 1995; and
( b ) The reexportation of the U.S.-origin goods or technology to Iran or the Government of Iran was not subject to reexport (as opposed to export) license application requirements under U.S. regulations in effect prior to May 6, 1995.
Note 1 to § 560.414 :
The exclusion in this section applies, among other things, to goods that were as of May 6, 1995, classified under the U.S. Department of Commerce's Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) as ECCNs 2A994; 3A993; 5A992; 5A995; 6A990; 6A994; 7A994; 8A992; 8A994; 9A990; 9A992; and 9A994, that were exported from the United States prior to 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, May 7, 1995, and were not the property of a United States person as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, May 7, 1995. As of April 26, 1999, items covered by this note are classified under ECCNs 2A994; 3A992.a; 5A991.f; 5A992.a and .c; 6A991; 6A998.a; 7A994; 8A992.d, .e, .f and .g; 9A990.a and .b; and 9A991.d and .e.
Note 2 to § 560.414 :
A reexportation of U.S.-origin goods or technology which meets the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section, or which is not within the scope of § 560.205, nevertheless may require specific authorization by other agencies of the U.S. Government for reexportation to Iran or the Government of Iran. For example, items which meet the conditions of paragraph (a) may nevertheless require an export license under the End User and End Use Control Policies found in provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR part 744).
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A Along
      Mobile Technologies, Inc.., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
      certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:


The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2004 (the
      "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A Along Mobile Technologies,
      Inc. and will be retained by International Synergy Holding Company, Ltd. N/K/A
      Along Mobile Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      April 28, 2006


/s/ Jian
                Wei
                LiJian
                  Wei Li
                President
                  and Chief
                  Executive Officer


/s/ Zhen
                  WanZhen
                      Wan
                    Chief
                        Financial Officer
§ 562.407 Significant transaction or transactions. In determining, for purposes of section 1(a)(ii) and 1(a)(iii) of Executive Order 13871, whether a transaction is significant, the Secretary of the Treasury may consider the totality of the facts and circumstances. As a general matter, the Secretary may consider some or all of the following factors: ( a ) *Size, number, and frequency.* The size, number, and frequency of transactions performed, over a period of time, including whether the transactions are increasing or decreasing over time and the rate of increase or decrease.
( b ) *Nature.* The nature of the transaction(s), or the goods or services for sale, supply, or transfer, including the type, complexity, and commercial purpose of the transaction(s), or the goods or services for sale, supply, or transfer.
( c ) *Level of Awareness; Pattern of Conduct.* ( 1 ) Whether the transaction(s) is performed with the involvement or approval of management or only by clerical personnel; and
( 2 ) Whether the transaction(s) is part of a pattern of conduct or the result of a business development strategy.
( d ) *Nexus.* The proximity between the person that engaged in the transaction(s) and the activity described in sections 1(a)(ii) and (iii) of Executive Order 13871.
( e ) *Impact.* The impact of the transaction(s) on the objectives of Executive Order 13871, including the economic or other benefit conferred or attempted to be conferred on Iran or the iron, steel, aluminum, and copper sectors of Iran.
( f ) *Deceptive practices.* Whether the transaction(s) involves an attempt to obscure or conceal the actual parties or true nature of the transaction(s), or to evade sanctions.
( g ) *Other relevant factors.* Such other factors that the Secretary deems relevant on a case-by-case basis in determining the significance of a transaction(s) or the sale, supply, or transfer of goods or services.
[84 FR 38550, Aug. 7, 2019]
#### Norman E. ROTH, University Hill Realty, Ltd., Stampede, Llc., Stampede II, Llc. and Stampede III, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Syracuse Housing Authority, Frederick R. Murphy, individually and in his professional capacity as Director of Syracuse Housing Authority, Roy Bernardi, individually and in his professional capacity as Mayor, Vito Sciscioli, individually and in his professional capacity as Director of Community Development and Terry Kresser, in*87dividually and in his professional capacity as the Supervisor of Syracuse Housing Authority's Section 8 Program, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-7727.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 20, 2001.

Alan J. Pierce, Hancock & Estabrook, Syracuse, NY, for appellants.

Karen M. Richards, Ass’t Corp. Counsel, Syracuse, NY, for appellees City of Syracuse, Bernardi, and Sciscioli.

Robert Kirchner, Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse, NY, for appellees Syracuse Housing ' Authority, Murphy, and Kresser.

Present Van GRAAFEILAND, KEARSE and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was argued by counsel for appellants and the City appellees, and was submitted by counsel for the Housing Authority appellees.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Mordue’s Memorandum-Decision and Order dated May 5, 2000. Giving consideration to 24 C.F.R. § 982.306 as a whole, which provides housing authorities with considerable discretion to determine which landlords may participate in Section 8 programs and states that “[njothing in this rule is intended to give any owner any right to participate in the program,” *see id.*§ 982.306(e), we conclude that plaintiffs did not show an entitlement to participate in such programs or a property interest sufficient to support their due process claims.

We have considered all of plaintiffs’ contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         451,999
<SECURITIES>                                   534,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    777,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,899,377
<PP&E>                                         185,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,061,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,082,398
<COMMON>                                       237,946
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,110,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,061,324
<SALES>                                        987,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,027,185
<CGS>                                          361,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  914,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                112,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,685
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>