alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 583.513 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates for personal, non-commercial use. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities are: ( i ) Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* For the purposes of this section, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* For the purposes of this section, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 583.513 :
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
HomeCommunity Engagement...Community-Led Monitoring

# 									Community-Led Monitoring							

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

August 10, 2020

**Community-Led Monitoring**

Community-led monitoring (CLM) is a technique initiated and implemented by local community-based organizations and other civil society groups, networks of key populations (KP), people living with HIV (PLHIV), and other affected groups or other community entities that gathers quantitative and qualitative data about HIV services. The focus is on getting input from recipients of HIV services, especially key populations and underserved groups, in a routine and systematic manner that will translate into action and change. CLM is central to PEPFAR’s client-centered approach because it helps puts communities, their needs, and their voices at the center of the HIV response.

Why does PEPFAR support Community-Led Monitoring?

CLM conducted by local civil society organizations helps PEPFAR programs and health institutions diagnose and pinpoint persistent problems, challenges, and barriers related to HIV service access, uptake, and retention at the community and facility level. CLM aims to improve HIV service delivery and client outcomes by identifying data-driven solutions to overcome barriers and ensure beneficiaries receive optimal client-centered HIV services in a manner that is productive, collaborative, respectful, and solutions-oriented.

Who does PEPFAR fund for CLM?

PEPFAR-supported CLM is conducted objectively by independent, local community organizations. PEPFAR implementing partners who currently work on service delivery at the site level are not eligible for CLM funding, even if they will sub-grant to a local civil society organization.

What is monitored and how?
        - Systematic and routine, with follow up and continuous improvement.
        - Tailored to the needs identified by local communities, with communities directly determining the scope.
        - Allow for community and host country government development of the specific metrics, measures, or tools to be used for CLM. Metrics or measures should be tailored to a given context and address the specific needs and concerns of community members.
        - Triangulated with, but not duplicative of, other PEPFAR data streams. Community-led monitoring data should reflect an ‘added value’ and not duplicate collection of routine data already available to PEPFAR. ‘Added value’ monitoring data includes: information from beneficiaries about their experience with the health facility, information about barriers and enablers to access and retention in services, etc.
        - Productive, collaborative, respectful, and solutions-oriented.
        - Action-oriented with an associated follow-up process with the health facility that is overseen by U.S. government staff, committed to corrective public health action, and involves community advocacy to improve service outcomes

External Sources

PEPFAR Community-led Monitoring Fact Sheet [293 KB]

PEPFAR Solutions Tools Page, Community-led Monitoring Tools  

Back to Top
40446.

#### WATERS v. RENTZ.

Decided December 2, 1963.

*Sumner & Boatright, J. Laddie Boatright,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. W. Heath,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

In eveiy action filed in the courts of this State there must be a legal entity as the real plaintiff and the real defendant, either a natural person, an artificial person, such as a corporation, or a quasi artificial person, such as a *712partnership. *Western &c. R. Co. v. Dalton Marble Works,*122 Ga, 774 (50 SE 978). In an action in a justice’s court where the name “Rentz Grocery” is purportedly shown to be the plaintiff in the action, the action is a nullity for the reason that “Rentz Grocery”, to say the least of it, .does not import the name of an individual or trade name and is not amendable since the evidence in the case shows that “Rentz Grocery” is a trade name under which Mrs. W. B. Rentz did business. *Western &c. R. Co. v. Dalton Marble Works,*supra. The effect of the ruling in the *Dalton Marble Works*case is that the name under which the suit was brought *did not import a trade name*under which a legal entity was doing business to the extent that it was amendable. *Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer Works,*146 Ga. 832 (92 SE 648) is not contrary to the *Dalton Marble Works*ruling for the reason that it. was held in that case that “Armour Fertilizer Works” imports the name of a corporation to the extent that it was amendable to so show. Nor is the ruling in *Mauldin v. Stogner,*75 Ga. App. 663 (44 SE2d 274) contrary to what is herein held because in that case it was held that “Atlanta Plating Works” imported the name of a partnership and that the defendant’s identity could be shown by amendment to be a partnership. *Clark Bros. v. Wyche,*126 Ga. 24 (54 SE 909) is not contrary to what is herein ruled because the rationale of that case is based on the principle of estoppel by judgment against the plaintiff. There seems to be a conflict of authority as to whether a name ending with the word “company” imports a trade name under which some legal entity is doing business to the extent that it is amendable, ’ but we do not have that question in this case. On a trial of the issue raised by the affidavit of illegality filed by the defendant the' court overruled a motion for a directed verdict made by the defendant Waters and overruled his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. After a finding by the court, trying the case by consent without a jury, in favor of the plaintiff Rentz Grocery against the defendant, the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict for the reason that the evidence showed that “Rentz Grocery” was a trade name under which Mrs. W. B. Rentz was doing business. The judgment is reversed with direc*713tion that judgment be entered in accordance -with the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Eberhardt and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          27,651
<SECURITIES>                                    51,662
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,307
<INVENTORY>                                      5,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,521
<PP&E>                                          23,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        82,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,257
<SALES>                                         52,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Office of Regional Security Cooperation

# Office of Regional Security Cooperation

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Regional Security Cooperation serves as the lead within the Department for all matters related to existing and prospective Eurasian and Euro-Atlantic arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements, in addition to security and stability arrangements concerning conventional and non-nuclear weapons and forces, including the development and adoption of approaches for achieving such policies.  Additionally, the office leads efforts globally to assist other States at the regional level to reduce the risk of armed escalation or miscalculation and improve trust and transparency by sharing U.S. expertise in risk reduction and helping broker agreements or arrangements between States to promote strategic stability.				

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 353
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 353.83 Reissue or payment on dissolution of corporation or partnership. ( a ) *Corporations.* A bond registered in the name of a private corporation which is in the process of dissolution will be paid to the authorized representative of the corporation upon a request for payment, supported by satisfactory evidence of the representative's authority. At the termination of dissolution proceedings, the bond may be reissued upon the request of the authorized representative in the names of those persons, other than creditors, entitled to the assets of the corporation, to the extent of their respective interests. Proof will be required that all statutory provisions governing the dissolution of the corporation have been complied with and that the persons in whose names reissue is requested are entitled and have agreed to the reissue. If the dissolution proceedings are under the direction of a court, a certified copy of an order of the court, showing the authority of the representative to make the distribution requested must be furnished.
( b ) *Partnerships.* A bond registered in the name of a partnership which has been dissolved by death or withdrawal of a partner, or in any other manner: ( 1 ) Will be paid upon a request for payment by any partner or partners authorized by law to act on behalf of the dissolved partnership, or
( 2 ) Will be paid to or reissued in the names of the persons entitled as the result of such dissolution to the extent of their respective interests, except that reissue will not be made in the names of creditors. The request must be supported by satisfactory evidence of entitlement, including proof that the debts of the partnership have been paid or properly provided for. The appropriate form should be used.
www.gpo.gov

### §229a. Water struck while drilling for oil and gas

#### (a) Acquisition; condition in lease

All prospecting permits and leases for oil or gas made or issued under the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to the condition that in case the permittee or lessee strikes water while drilling instead of oil or gas, the Secretary of the Interior may, when such water is of such quality and quantity as to be valuable and usable at a reasonable cost for agricultural, domestic, or other purposes, purchase the casing in the well at the reasonable value thereof to be fixed under rules and regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (b) Prior leases

In cases where water wells producing such water have heretofore been or may hereafter be drilled upon lands embraced in any prospecting permit or lease heretofore issued under this chapter, the Secretary may in like manner purchase the casing in such wells.

#### (c) Disposition

The Secretary may make such purchase and may lease or operate such wells for the purpose of producing water and of using the same on the public lands or of disposing of such water for beneficial use on other lands, and where such wells have heretofore been plugged or abandoned or where such wells have been drilled prior to the issuance of any permit or lease by persons not in privity with the permittee or lessee, the Secretary may develop the same for the purposes of this section: *Provided*, That owners or occupants of lands adjacent to those upon which such water wells may be developed shall have a preference right to make beneficial use of such water.

#### (d) Revolving fund

The Secretary may use so much of any funds available for the plugging of wells as he may find necessary to start the program provided for by this section, and thereafter he may use the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of such water as a revolving fund for the continuation of such program, and such proceeds are hereby appropriated for such purpose.

#### (e) Operations under lease not restricted

Nothing in this section shall be construed to restrict operations under any oil or gas lease or permit under any other provisions of this chapter.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §40, as added June 16, 1934, ch. 557, 48 Stat. 977; amended Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.)

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–579 struck out proviso relating to reservation of land as a water hole under section 300 of title 43.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Section 704(a) of Pub. L. 94–579 provided that the amendment made by that section is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in title 10 sections 7421, 7435.
"Matt Todd" <ToddM@api.org>

04/07/2009 12:10 PM To: Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc: Bob Lucas/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Refinery RTR Final Rule

KC,

After review of the final rule posted on EPA’s website, API and NPRA are submitting the attached suggested clarifications and corrections. Pleas e feel free to contact me with any questions.

Regards,

Matt Todd

Matthew Todd

API

1220 L Street NW Washington DC 20005

202.682.8319 www.api.org
imax-ex1043_9.htm



IMAX CORPORATION

 

Exhibit 10.43

 

 

Summary of Directors’ Compensation

 

 

 


	
1.
	
In respect of each year during which an independent Director serves as a Director of the Corporation, such Director shall receive:




 


	
 
	
a.
	
$50,000 (US) per year payable quarterly in arrears;




 


	
 
	
b.
	
at the commencement of each year of office or upon joining the Board, or as soon as practicable thereafter, a grant of RSUs with an aggregate value of US $125,000 on the date of grant that will vest on the date of grant;




 


	
 
	
c.
	
reimbursement of any expenses incurred by the Director in connection with participation in Board or Committee meetings.




 


	
2.
	
Committee Chairs shall receive the following yearly fees, which are payable quarterly, in arrears:




 

Audit Committee Chair US $15,000

Compensation Committee Chair US $10,000

Governance Committee Chair US $10,000

 


	
3.
	
Committee members shall receive the following yearly retainers, which are payable quarterly, in arrears:




 

Audit Committee US $10,000

Compensation Committee US $  7,500

Governance Committee US $  5,000

 


	
4.
	
The Lead Independent Director shall receive a yearly retainer of US $15,000, which is payable quarterly, in arrears.




 


	
5.
	
In addition to the compensation received under a services agreement dated December 11, 2008, as amended by an amending agreement dated April 1, 2013, the Chairman of the Board will receive an annual grant of RSUs with an aggregate value of US $170,000 on the date of grant.




 


	
6.
	
The annual compensation for Directors, as set out above, shall remain in effect until it is amended or revoked by further resolution.




 

 

 

 

January 12, 2021
#### § 599.308 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Burma Regime Airstrikes

# 									Burma Regime Airstrikes							

Press Statement

Vedant Patel, Principal Deputy Spokesperson

April 11, 2023

We are deeply concerned by today’s reports of a Burma military airstrike in the Sagaing region that killed more than 50 people and injured at least 30 people, including children. This attack follows reports of airstrikes in Chin State on April 10 that killed at least nine people. These violent attacks further underscore the regime’s disregard for human life and its responsibility for the dire political and humanitarian crisis in Burma following the February 2021 coup.

The United States calls on the Burma regime to cease the horrific violence, allow unhindered humanitarian access, and to respect the genuine and inclusive democratic aspirations of the people of Burma. The military regime must abide by its obligations under international humanitarian law, including rules on the protection of civilians. The United States will continue to work with the international community to hold the regime accountable for violations and abuses committed in Burma.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaHuman RightsHumanitarian AidOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 March 11, 2009
    /s/ Thomas J. NeriThomas J. NeriChief Executive Officer/s/ F. Terrence BlanchardF. Terrence BlanchardChief Financial Officer
# Belarus

140 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 12, 2022	  Ned PriceOctober 12, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		Welcoming the Release of Political Prisoners in Belarus	  Ned PriceSeptember 25, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – August 17, 2022	  Ned PriceAugust 17, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability on the Second Anniversary of the Fraudulent Election in Belarus	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Belarus	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Belarus	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Outcomes of the 50th Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  July 12, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Second Statement on Russia’s War on Ukraine & International Sport	  July 5, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Belarus National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 3, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Belarus	  June 2, 2022 

previous page1…45678…14next page

Back to Top
§ 594.207 Exempt transactions. The prohibitions contained in § 594.201(a)(6) and (7) do not apply to the following activities: ( a ) Any authorized intelligence, law enforcement, or national security activities of the United States; or
( b ) Any transaction necessary to comply with United States obligations under the Agreement between the United Nations and the United States of America regarding the Headquarters of the United States, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, or the Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and entered into force March 19, 1967, or any other United States international agreement.
[84 FR 35312, July 23, 2019]
§ 560.417 Facilitation; change of policies and procedures; referral of business opportunities offshore. With respect to § 560.208, a prohibited facilitation or approval of a transaction by a foreign person occurs, among other instances, when a United States person: ( a ) Alters its operating policies or procedures, or those of a foreign affiliate, to permit a foreign affiliate to accept or perform a specific contract, engagement or transaction involving Iran or the Government of Iran without the approval of the United States person, where such transaction previously required approval by the United States person and such transaction by the foreign affiliate would be prohibited by this part if performed directly by a United States person or from the United States;
( b ) Refers to a foreign person purchase orders, requests for bids, or similar business opportunities involving Iran or the Government of Iran to which the United States person could not directly respond as a result of the prohibitions contained in this part; or
( c ) Changes the operating policies and procedures of a particular affiliate with the specific purpose of facilitating transactions that would be prohibited by this part if performed by a United States person or from the United States.