Appendix 10A 

Minnesota’s Final Consultation 

Report 
 

1 

TO: Participants in the Northern Class I Areas Consultation Process 

RE: Northern Class I Areas Consultation Conclusion 

As you are aware, Minnesota is home to two federal Class I areas, Voyageurs National Park 

(VNP) and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW), located in the northern 

portion of the state. Under the federal Regional Haze Rule (40 CFR 51.300-309), the State of 

Minnesota is required to work to improve visibility in these two areas, with a goal of no manmade visibility impairment by 2064. 

Under the portion of the Regional Haze regulations at 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1)(iv), states with Class 

I areas are required to develop reasonable progress goals (RPG) for visibility improvement at 

their Class I areas and associated measures to meet those goals, in consultation with any other 

State or Tribe that may reasonably cause or contribute to visibility impairment in those areas. 

This letter provides information on how Minnesota intends to address the reasonable progress 

goals, identification of the states that cause or contribute to visibility impairment in Minnesota’s 

Class I areas, and our expectations for continued coordination with those states on haze-reducing 

strategies. 

Beginning in 2004 and 2005, a number of discussions were held between state and tribal 

representatives in the upper Midwest concerning air quality planning to address regional haze in 

the four Class I areas in Michigan and Minnesota. Formal discussions geared toward the State 

Implementation Plans (SIP) consultation requirements began in July 2006, in a conference call 

among representatives from Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, the Mille 

Lacs and Leech Lake bands of Ojibwe, and Federal Land Managers (FLM), Regional Planning 

Organization (RPO) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) personnel. It was decided 

that other potentially contributing states should be asked to participate in the consultation 

process, and that consultation should continue through ongoing conference calls during the 

development of the regional haze SIP. Minutes of the conference calls and other documentation 

can be found on the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium/Midwest Regional Planning 

Organization (LADCO/MRPO) Web site.1

The group consulted on technical information, producing a document entitled Regional Haze in 

the Upper Midwest: Summary of Technical Information, which lays out the basic sources that 

cause and contribute to haze in the four Northern Class I areas, as agreed to by all the 

participating states.2

 

1

 http://www.ladco.org/Regional_haze_consultation.htm 2

 http://www.ladco.org/Final%20Technical%20Memo%20-%20Version%205d1.pdf 

1
 

2 

 

Based on the technical information contained in this document and other supporting analyses, 

Minnesota has determined that, in addition to Minnesota, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, 

and Wisconsin are significant contributors to visibility impairment in VNP and the BWCAW. 

Attachment 1 to this letter provides a summary of how Minnesota reached this conclusion.3

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has not yet completed modeling to determine 

the RPG for these two Class I Areas. However, because of the varying timelines and different 

non-attainment issues impacting Minnesota and other contributing states, Minnesota intends to 

submit a RPG resulting from implementation of the minimum interim control measures 

Minnesota would consider to be reasonable. This decision reflects the need for more in-depth 

analysis before additional control measures can be determined to be reasonable. The RPG would 

be revised in the Five Year SIP Assessment to reflect final control measures. 

In addition to on-the-books controls, such as the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), Minnesota 

expects the RPG to reflect Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) determinations in 

Minnesota and surrounding states (where known), the plan for a 30 percent reduction in 

combined sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions in Northeastern Minnesota, 

voluntary emission reductions planned by Minnesota utilities beyond those predicted from 

CAIR, and, where known, any additional control measures undertaken in other states for regional 

haze or attainment purposes. The MPCA expects that the modeling information needed to set the 

RPG would be available by October 2007. 

Minnesota commits to evaluating additional control measures and implementing those that are 

reasonable under the four factors listed in 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1)(i)(A) in the 2008 SIP. Minnesota 

expects that additional control measures may be found to be reasonable, and commits to 

including a plan for implementation of those additional reasonable measures in the Five Year SIP 

Assessment. Minnesota asks the five other significantly contributing states to make these same 

commitments for further evaluation and implementation of reasonable control measures. 

In particular, Minnesota asks Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, and Wisconsin to evaluate further 

reductions of SO2 from electric generating units (EGU) in order to reduce SO2 emissions by 

2018 to a rate that is more comparable to the rate projected in 2018 for Minnesota, 

approximately 0.25 lbs/mmBtu. Minnesota believes that Illinois is already in the process of 

meeting this goal. Emission reductions in Wisconsin are particularly important, as Wisconsin is 

the highest contributor outside Minnesota to visibility impairment in Minnesota’s Class I areas. 

Minnesota also asks North Dakota to evaluate the potential for reductions of NOX from EGUs 

due to predicted higher NOX emission rates compared with Minnesota and other contributing 

states. Illinois, Missouri, and Wisconsin are in the process of evaluating NOX emission 

 

 

 

3

 Minnesota is relying primarily on data analysis and technical work done by MRPO and CENRAP. 

2
 

3 

reductions for their ozone SIPs. Minnesota would expect these three states to share information 

on the NOX controls being undertaken as part of those ozone SIPs. 

Minnesota acknowledges that each state is in a unique position; for example, North Dakota has a 

different regulatory background and a different fuel mix than other contributing states. 

Minnesota’s use of emission rates to point towards areas where additional emission control 

strategies should be investigated does not mean that Minnesota expects all the contributing states 

to achieve the same emission rates. However, the contributing states with higher emission rates 

should evaluate potential control measures, and should, in their initial SIPs or Five Year SIP 

Assessments, show either enforceable plans to reduce emissions or a rationale for why such 

emission reductions are not reasonable (e.g., an overly high cost in $/ton or $/deciview, or lack 

of visibility improvement). 

Minnesota, in turn, also commits to a more detailed review of potential emission reductions from 

large Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) Boilers and other point sources (such as 

reciprocating engines and turbines) with regulations or permit limits developed by 2013 and 

included in the Five Year SIP Assessment if control measures on these source categories appear 

to be reasonable. Minnesota asks the five contributing states to make a similar commitment. 

It is the intent of Minnesota to proceed with the development and submittal of a Regional Haze 

Plan which includes the aforementioned RPG and expectations for contributing states. Minnesota 

commits to continuing work with the other states to review and analyze potential region-wide 

control strategies and emission reductions plans and to continue on-going assessments of 

progress towards visibility improvement goals. 

Minnesota asks that any additional control measures found to be reasonable will be included in 

each state’s SIP or Five Year SIP Assessment in an enforceable form. This will ensure that the 

control measures are on track to be implemented by the 2018 deadline for submittal of SIPs 

covering the second phase of the Regional Haze process. 

Minnesota believes that the consultations conducted to date satisfy the consultation process 

requirements, providing for consistency between state SIPs and allowing each state to move 

forward with SIP preparation and submittal. As necessary, Minnesota will engage in future 

consultation to address any issues identified in the review of the Regional Haze SIPs, any 

additional technical information, and to ensure continued coordinated efforts among the 

Midwestern states. 

Attached to this letter is an outline of the reasonable progress discussion to appear in our SIP and 

additional supporting tables and graphs. 

In order to document the consultation process, the MPCA is asking that the State and Tribal 

recipients of this letter respond within 30 days with a letter documenting that these consultations 

have taken place to the satisfaction of your State or Tribe, or detailing areas where additional 

3
 

4 

consultation should occur. Those states that Minnesota has identified as additional contributing 

states should respond with your agreement or disagreement with the determination of 

contributing states and the additional controls strategies that will be evaluated. 

Thank you for your participation and contributions in this consultation process. Your time and 

efforts are appreciated. If you require additional information regarding this matter, please contact 

John Seltz at 651-296-7801 or john.seltz@pca.state.mn.us. 

Sincerely, 

Brad Moore 

Commissioner 

4
 

5 

Attachment 1: Supporting Technical Information – Determination of Contributing States 

Minnesota used the LADCO 2002 – 2003 Trajectory Analyses and the LADCO 2018 PSAT 

analysis, using a 5% threshold of contribution from either analysis to either of Minnesota’s Class 

I areas, to define a contributing state. Based on this information, the States identified as 

contributing to visibility impairment in Minnesota’s Class I Areas are: Minnesota, Wisconsin, 

Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, and North Dakota. 

The table below documents the percent contribution to visibility impairment by the States that 

have participated in the Northern Class I consultation process, estimated from 2000 – 2003 

LADCO trajectory analysis, with supporting information from the CENRAP 2002 PSAT model 

of the 20% worst days.4

State Impacts on Minnesota’s Class I Areas – Baseline Period 

LADCO Trajectory Analyses 

(2000-2003) 

CENRAP PSAT Modeling 

(2002) 

 BWCAW VNP BWCAW VNP 

Michigan 0.7% 1.6% 2.6% 1.4% 

Minnesota 37.6% 36.9% 25.4% 27.6 

Wisconsin 11.1% 9.7% 8.6% 5.6% 

Illinois 2.7% 1.2% 7.3% 3.7% 

Indiana 1.2% 3.8% 1.8% 

Iowa 7.4% 10.2% 3.9% 3.8% 

Missouri 3.3% 0.3% 2.7% 2.1% 

N. Dakota 5.9% 7.1% 4.8% 7.1% 

TOTAL 69.9% 67.0% 59.2% 53.1% 

The following table documents the percent contribution from these same states projected for the 

future based on LADCO’s 2018 Particulate Matter Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT) 

analysis, with supporting information from the CENRAP 2018 PSAT model of the 20% worst 

days.5

 Although in some cases the percentage impacts predicted by CENRAP are lower than 

those predicted by the MRPO PSAT analysis (Iowa, Missouri), the identified states remain the 

higher contributors. The relative order of contributing states does not change much between 

2002 and 2018. 

 

4

 Environ. (2007, July 18). CENRAP PSAT Visualization Tool. (Corrected Version). Available on the CENRAP 

Projects webpage 

5

 Ibid. 

5
 

6 

State Impacts on Minnesota’s Class I Areas – Future Year (2018 PSAT) 

LADCO PSAT Modeling 

(2018) 

CENRAP PSAT Modeling 

(2018) 

 BWCAW VNP BWCAW VNP 

Michigan 2.6% 1.3% 2.2% 1% 

Minnesota 30.5% 35.0% 19.8% 18.0% 

Wisconsin 10.4% 6.3% 6.0% 3.1% 

Illinois 5.2% 3.0% 3.7% 1.6% 

Indiana 2.9% 1.6% 1.8% 0.8% 

Iowa 7.6% 7.4% 2.9% 2.5% 

Missouri 5.2% 4.3% 2.3% 1.6% 

N. Dakota 5.7% 10.3% 3.7% 4.7% 

TOTAL 70.1% 69.2% 42.5% 33.3% 

The states with contributions over 5% to the Class I areas in these analyses generally match well 

with the impacting states shown in the Area of Influence (AOI) analysis done by Alpine 

Geophysics for CENRAP. 

 AOIs for Minnesota’s Class I Areas6

 

6

 Stella, G.M et al. (2006, May 9). CENRAP Regional Haze Control Strategy Analysis Plan. Prepared by Alpine 

Geophysics. Available on the CENRAP Projects webpage http://www.cenrap.org/projects.asp 

6
 

7 

Attachment 2: Outline of an Approach to Defining Reasonable Progress for Minnesota 

Class I Areas in the Minnesota Regional Haze SIP

Under EPA rules, Minnesota has a responsibility to set a Reasonable Progress Goal (RPG) for 

visibility in the Boundary Waters and Voyageurs Park. Because the states that contribute to our 

Class I areas will submit their SIPs at different times, Minnesota sets forth the following 

proposal for setting a RPG for our two Class I areas. This document lays out the elements that 

we plan to include. 

Minnesota’s Long Term Strategy section will include those control strategies which we plan to 

undertake and which we consider to be reasonable. It will also include any known controls that 

are being undertaken in the nearby states, particularly the five states (IL, WI, ND, IA, and MO) 

that have been identified as contributors to BWCAW and VNP. 

• Minnesota’s LTS Contains 

o BART 

 For Minnesota: Minimal emission reductions 

 As known for other states 

o CAIR and resulting EGU reductions 

 For Minnesota 

 As known for other states 

o Control strategies for PM2.5 and Ozone attainment SIPs 

 As known for other states 

o Other federal on-the-books (OTB) controls: 

 Tier II for on-highway mobile sources 

 Heavy-duty diesel (2007) engine standards 

 Low sulfur fuel standards 

 Federal control programs for nonroad mobile sources 

o Additional Emission Limitations 

 NE Minnesota Plan (30% reduction in combined SO2/NOX as a fair share) 

 Additional voluntary reductions as a result of MN Statutes 216B.1692 (emission 

reduction rider) 

 Anything known for other states 

o Other long term strategy (LTS) Components (without specific emission reductions) 

 Measures to mitigate emissions from construction 

 Source retirement and replacement 

 Smoke management for prescribed burns in Minnesota 

After documenting all the components of the LTS, Minnesota will lay out the RPG determined 

for the best and worst days at VNP and BWCAW. 

7
 

8 

Reasonable Progress Goals 

Once determined, the RPG submitted in Minnesota’s SIP will represent an interim, minimum

visibility improvement Minnesota would consider to be reasonable, and contain emission 

reductions resulting from the elements of the long term strategy. 

At this time, Minnesota believes that this is an appropriate goal because other impacting states 

are working on a multi-SIP approach and have yet to determine what reductions are reasonable 

in their states for both haze and attainment purposes. Although we cannot compel the states to 

undertake reductions, Minnesota would expect further emissions reductions than are documented 

here, resulting in larger visibility improvement. Minnesota intends to revise the RPG for 2018 in 

the Five Year SIP Assessment, in order to reflect the additional control strategies found to be 

reasonable. 

Steps in Reviewing Control Strategies and Revising RPG 

In reviewing additional control strategies to determine those that are reasonable under the 

Regional Haze rule, Minnesota will focus on strategies that will result in emission reductions in 

those states that are significant contributors to visibility impairment in either BWCAW or VNP: 

Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, N. Dakota, Missouri and Illinois. 

The MPCA commits to further evaluation of reasonable control strategies that are possible 

within Minnesota. Minnesota will work with the other contributing states through their 

submittals of the first haze SIP and through 2013 to develop reasonable control strategies. 

In the Five Year SIP Assessment, the MPCA would submit enforceable documents for any 

additional control measures found to be reasonable within Minnesota. In addition, that report 

would contain a listing of the additional control measures to be implemented by the other 

contributing states. Minnesota would then submit modeling that includes all these enforceable 

measures and would revise the 2018 RPG to reflect the larger degree of visibility improvement 

expected from the chosen control strategies. 

Specific Control Strategies to Be Reviewed 

Minnesota will use the EC/R five factor analysis report, the control cost analysis carried out by 

Alpine Geophysics for CENRAP and the CENRAP Control Sensitivity Model run to identify 

reasonable region-wide emission reduction strategies. (See Attachment 3). 

The specific strategies that at this time appear to potentially be reasonable, and Minnesota’s 

expectation for each of these strategies for other states, are outlined below. 

EGU SO2 Reductions

Minnesota will ask the contributing states to look at their EGU emissions of SO2; Minnesota will 

particularly focus on possible reductions in states with emission rates that appear to be higher 

than the average among the Midwestern states. Since contributor states face a variety of 

regulatory demands and fuel types, it may not be possible to attain uniform emission 

performance. An emission rate of about 0.25 lb/mmBTU should be achievable in a costeffective manner; this is the level being achieved in Minnesota and Illinois, and the EC/R report 

8
 

9 

shows that the “EGU1” scenario, a 0.15 lb/mmBTU emission rate, is generally achievable in the 

Midwest at a reasonable $/ton figure. (See Attachment 3). 

Minnesota asks the identified states to demonstrate that reductions are occurring or being 

undertaken that will allow the state to reach at least the 0.25 lb/mmBTU emission rate, or to 

describe in their SIPs or Five-Year SIP Assessments why further reductions of SO2 from EGU 

are not reasonable. Further reductions may not be reasonable due to the cost of implementation 

in $/ton or $/deciview or lack of impact on visibility impairment, but they should be evaluated. 

At present, it appears as though Illinois has planned or proposed reductions that appear 

reasonable. It appears that more cost effective reductions are possible in Iowa, Missouri, North 

Dakota, and Wisconsin. Since Wisconsin is the largest non-Minnesota contributor to 

Minnesota’s Class I areas, their efforts to reduce EGU SO2 emissions are particularly important. 

EGU NOX Reductions

Wisconsin, Missouri, and Illinois have already reduced NOX emissions to alleviate ozone 

standard violations, and Iowa appears to already have relatively low EGU NOX emissions. 

Minnesota will ask North Dakota to look at their EGU emissions of NOX and to describe in their 

SIP or Five-Year SIP Assessment why further reductions of NOX from EGU are not reasonable. 

Again, an emission rate of approximately 0.25 lb/mmBTU appears to be a reasonable 

benchmark. Further reductions may not be reasonable due to the cost of implementation in $/ton 

or $/deciview or lack of impact on visibility impairment, but they should be evaluated. 

ICI Boiler Emission Reductions

Minnesota will commit to a more detailed review of potential NOX and SO2 reductions from 

large ICI boilers. Regulations or permit limits will be developed by 2013 if significant cost 

effective reductions prove feasible from this sector. Minnesota will expect the five contributing 

states to make at least this level of commitment. 

Other Point Source Emission Reductions

Reciprocating engines and turbines appear to be a sector with potential cost effective NOX

controls. Minnesota commits to review this sector in more detail and if, after consideration of 

planned federal control programs, cost effective reductions appear feasible, Minnesota commits 

to develop regulations or permit limits for major sources by 2013. Minnesota will expect the five 

contributing states to make a similar commitment. 

Mobile Source Emission Reductions

There appear to be relatively few cost effective NOX controls for transportation available to 

states. Minnesota commits to work with LADCO states to implement appropriate cost effective 

NOX controls to improve visibility and lower ozone levels in non-attainment areas. 

NOX Modeling, Ammonia, Agricultural Sources

It is not appropriate to commit to control of ammonia sources at this time. However, there is a 

clear need to improve 1) our understanding of the role of ammonia in haze formation, 2) our 

understanding of potential ammonia controls, and 3) the accuracy of particulate nitrate 

9
 

10 

predictions. Minnesota does not consider it our responsibility to conduct such research. 

Minnesota therefore encourages EPA and the regional planning organizations to continue work 

in these areas and commits to work with EPA and the RPOs to these ends. 

Timeline for Reviewing Control Strategies 

Minnesota commits to reviewing these control strategies on such a timeline that the 2013 SIP 

Report will include the four factor analysis for these control strategies, and that any control 

strategies deemed to be reasonable will be in place with an enforceable document (state rule, 

order, or permit conditions). Although any control measures ultimately deemed to be reasonable 

may not be fully implemented by 2013, they will be clearly “on the way” and the SIP Report will 

include estimates of emission reductions and projected 2018 visibility conditions. 

Acknowledging that most states are far along in the process of writing their Regional Haze SIPs, 

Minnesota would expect that all other contributing states would commit to a timeline that would 

allow reasonable predictions of the emission reductions and visibility improvement by 2018 from 

those states in the 2013 SIP Report. 

10
 

11 

Attachment 3: Supporting Technical Information – Need for Additional Control Strategies 

Although there are some fairly major differences in the degree of visibility improvement 

expected at VNP and BWCAW due to on- the- books controls, projections by both CENRAP and 

Midwest RPO show that Minnesota’s Class I areas are not yet projected to meet the Uniform 

Rate of Progress, as shown in the graph below.7 In this graph, the URP is the “target reduction.” 

EPA’s recent guidance on determining the reasonable progress goal (RPG) indicates that states 

may set a RPG that provides for more, less, or equivalent improvement as the URP. However, 

the guidance continues to emphasize that an analysis of control strategies with the four factors is 

necessary; Minnesota believes this is particularly true in light of the lesser degree of visibility 

improvement shown from on- the- books controls in Minnesota’s Class I Areas. 

The EGU 2018 Summary table, following, shows projected 2018 EGU SO2 and NOX emissions. 

Highlighted cells indicate specific states and pollutants of concerns, where Minnesota has 

requested evaluation of potential reasonable control measures.8

 

7

 Morris, R. (2007, July 24). CENRAP Emissions and Modeling Technical Support Document, Prepared by 

Environ. Presentation Given at CENRAP Workgroup/POG Meeting. 

8

 Provided by Midwest RPO from the IPM 3.0 base run and edits made by certain states. 

CMAQ Method 1 predictions with new IMPROVE algorithm at CENRAP+ sites Across RPOs

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

BIBE1

GUMO1

WIMO1

CACR1

UPBU1

HEGL1

MING1

BRET1

VOYA2

BOWA1

MACA1

SIPS1

ISLE1

SACR1

WHIT1

WHPE1

GRSA1

ROMO1

WICA1

BADL1

THRO1

LOST1

Percent of target reduction achieved

CENRAP 36k Base18g/Typ02g

VISTAS 12k 2018g2b/2002gt2a

WRAP 36k Base18b/Plan02b corrected

MwRPO 2018 R4S1a

CENRAP non-CENRAP

11
12

EGU Summary for 2018

Heat Input 

(MMBTU/year) Scenario SO2 (tons/year) SO2 % Reduction (From 2001 - 03 Average) SO2 (lb/MMBTU) NOx (tons/year) NO

(From 

IL 980,197,198 2001 - 2003 (average) 362,417 0.74 173,296 

1,310,188,544 IPM3.0 (base) 277,337 23.5 0.423 70,378 

IPM3.0 - will do 140,296 61.3 0.214 62,990 

IPM3.0 - may do 140,296 61.3 0.214 62,990 

IA 390,791,671 2001 - 2003 (average) 131,080 0.67 77,935 

534,824,314 IPM3.0 (base) 115,938 11.6 0.434 59,994 

 IPM3.0 - will do 115,938 11.6 0.434 59,994 

IPM3.0 - may do 100,762 23.1 0.377 58,748 

MN 401,344,495 2001 - 2003 (average) 101,605 0.50 85,955 

447,645,758 IPM3.0 (base) 61,739 39.2 0.276 41,550 

IPM3.0 - will do 54,315 46.5 0.243 49,488 

IPM3.0 - may do 51,290 49.5 0.229 39,085 

MO 759,902,542 2001 - 2003 (average) 241,375 0.63 143,116 

893,454,905 IPM3.0 (base) 243,684 (1.0) 0.545 72,950 

 IPM3.0 - will do 237,600 1.6 0.532 72,950 

IPM3.0 - may do 237,600 1.6 0.532 72,950 

ND 339,952,821 2001 - 2003 (average) 145,096 0.85 76,788 

342,685,501 IPM3.0 (base) 41,149 71.6 0.240 44,164 

 IPM3.0 - will do 56,175 61.3 0.328 58,850 

IPM3.0 - may do 56,175 61.3 0.328 58,850 

WI 495,475,007 2001 - 2003 (average) 191,137 0.77 90,703 

675,863,447 IPM3.0 (base) 127,930 33.1 0.379 56,526 

 IPM3.0 - will do 150,340 21.3 0.445 55,019 

IPM3.0 - may do 62,439 67.3 0.185 46,154 

12
 

13 

Minnesota also used the cost-curve analysis performed for CENRAP by Alpine Geophysics, 

originally included in the CENRAP Regional Haze Control Strategy Analysis Plan and updated 

in March 2007, to determine which states might have additional reasonable control strategies. 

The cost curves were used to perform a modeling run (the “Control Sensitivity Run”) in order to 

determine the visibility improvement that could result from implementing certain control 

strategies.9

The following tables show which point sources are controlled in the CENRAP states that the 

MPCA has identified as contributing to visibility impairment in BWCAW and VNP (Iowa, 

Minnesota, Missouri) under the following assumptions: 1) a cost less than $5000/ton, and 2) 

facility emissions divided by the facility’s distance from any Class I area, is greater than or 

equal to five (often called the Q/5D criteria). The tables include sources that are within Q/5D of 

either VNP or BWCAW. 

The report prepared for the MPCA and Midwest RPO by EC/R, entitled “Reasonable Progress 

for Class I Areas in the Northern Midwest – Factor Analysis,” also provides documentation that 

the various control strategies mentioned in Attachment 2 are likely to be reasonable, at least for 

some states. A summary table follows the tables of units controlled in the CENRAP control 

sensitivity run.10

 

9

 Information on the Control Sensitivity run is available on CENRAP’s Project website, 

http://www.cenrap.org/projects.asp, under the link entitled Results from Control Sensitivity Run, Base18Gc1 - Cost 

Curve Criteria of 5k per ton, Q over 5D

10 Battye, W. et al (2007, July 18). Reasonable Progress for Class I Areas in the Northern Midwest – Factor 

Analysis. Prepared for MPCA and MRPO by EC/R. http://www.ladco.org/MRPO%20Report_071807.pdf. See 

Table 6.5-3, page 110.

13
14

NOX Controls, Q/5D for BWCAW and VNP 

State County Plant Name Point ID Source Type for Control Control Measure Tons Reduced Annu

Cost 

Iowa Woodbury MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - GEORGE NEAL NOR 148766 Utility Boiler - Coal/Wall SCR 3739 $5,25Iowa Woodbury MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - GEORGE NEAL SOU 147140 Utility Boiler - Coal/Wall - Other Coal LNBO 1191 $2,90Iowa Wapello IPL - OTTUMWA GENERATING STATION 143977 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 4708 $13,0Iowa Pottawattamie MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - COUNCIL BLUFFS 143798 Utility Boiler - Coal/Wall - Other Coal LNBO 671 $2,96Minnesota Cook MINNESOTA POWER - TACONITE HARBOR ENERGY EU001 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 411 $1,53Minnesota Cook MINNESOTA POWER - TACONITE HARBOR ENERGY EU002 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 411 $1,57Minnesota Cook MINNESOTA POWER - TACONITE HARBOR ENERGY EU003 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 411 $1,59Minnesota Itasca MINNESOTA POWER INC - BOSWELL ENERGY CTR EU004 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential - POD10 LNC3 806 $1,41Minnesota Itasca MINNESOTA POWER INC - BOSWELL ENERGY CTR EU003 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential - POD10 LNC3 600 $884Minnesota Koochiching Boise Cascade Corp - International Falls EU320 Sulfate Pulping - Recovery Furnaces SCR 361 $939Minnesota St. Louis MINNESOTA POWER INC - LASKIN ENERGY CTR EU001 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 1064 $1,34Minnesota St. Louis MINNESOTA POWER INC - LASKIN ENERGY CTR EU002 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential SCR 1063 $1,34Minnesota St. Louis EVTAC Mining - Fairlane Plant EU042 ICI Boilers - Coke SCR 1365 $3,14Minnesota Sherburne NSP - SHERBURNE GENERATING PLANT EU002 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential - POD10 LNC3 998 $1,87Minnesota Sherburne NSP - SHERBURNE GENERATING PLANT EU001 Utility Boiler - Coal/Tangential - POD10 LNC3 701 $1,88Missouri Pike HOLCIM (US) INC- CLARKSVILLE 16745 Cement Manufacturing - Wet Mid-Kiln Firing 1808 $149Missouri Randolph ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC-THOM 17575 Utility Boiler - Coal/Wall - Other Coal LNBO 682 $3,11

14
15

SO2 Controls, Q/5D for BWCAW or VNP 

State County Plant Name Point ID Source Type for Control Control Measure Tons Reduced Ann

Cos($2

Iowa Muscatine CENTRAL IOWA POWER COOP. - FAIR STATION 100125 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 4504 $5,8Iowa Woodbury MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - GEORGE NEAL NOR 148766 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 11440 $20Iowa Woodbury MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - GEORGE NEAL NOR 148765 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 7020 $13Iowa Woodbury MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - GEORGE NEAL SOU 147140 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14255 $35Iowa Wapello IPL - OTTUMWA GENERATING STATION 143977 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 15894 $40Iowa Louisa MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - LOUISA STATION 147281 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 12964 $36Iowa Pottawattamie MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. - COUNCIL BLUFFS 143798 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 12141 $36Iowa Des Moines IPL - BURLINGTON GENERATING STATION 145381 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 5384 $17Iowa Allamakee IPL - LANSING GENERATING STATION 145136 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 5926 $19Iowa Clinton IPL - M.L. KAPP GENERATING STATION 144559 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 5036 $17Iowa Linn IPL - PRAIRIE CREEK GENERATING STATION 144096 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 3753 $13Minnesota Itasca MINNESOTA POWER INC - BOSWELL ENERGY CTR EU001 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 2329 $9,4Minnesota Itasca MINNESOTA POWER INC - BOSWELL ENERGY CTR EU002 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 2315 $9,4Minnesota Itasca MINNESOTA POWER INC - BOSWELL ENERGY CTR EU004 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 7403 $30Missouri Clay INDEPENDENCE POWER AND LIGHT-MISSOURI CI 5430 Utility Boilers - Very High Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 8058 $6,2Missouri Franklin AMERENUE-LABADIE PLANT 6964 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14741 $34

15
16

State County Plant Name Point ID Source Type for Control Control Measure Tons Reduced Ann

Cos($2

Missouri Franklin AMERENUE-LABADIE PLANT 7408 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14988 $34Missouri Franklin AMERENUE-LABADIE PLANT 7262 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14912 $34Missouri Jefferson AMERENUE-RUSH ISLAND PLANT 11565 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 13979 $32Missouri Franklin AMERENUE-LABADIE PLANT 7087 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14285 $34Missouri Henry KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO-MONTROSE GE 7847 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 6362 $15Missouri Henry KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO-MONTROSE GE 7849 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 6191 $15Missouri Jefferson AMERENUE-RUSH ISLAND PLANT 11563 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 13276 $32Missouri Henry KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO-MONTROSE GE 7848 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 5928 $14Missouri St. Louis AMERENUE-MERAMEC PLANT 21421 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 8494 $21Missouri St. Louis ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC-ST. LOUIS 20274 Bituminous/Subbitumin ous Coal (Industrial Boilers) SDA 1996 $5,3Missouri Platte KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO-IATAN GENER 16912 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 14332 $38Missouri Jackson AQUILA INC-SIBLEY GENERATING STATION 9953 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 9166 $24Missouri St. Louis AMERENUE-MERAMEC PLANT 21423 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 7081 $19Missouri Randolph ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC-THOM 17575 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 9469 $38Missouri New Madrid ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC-NEW 14944 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 8132 $33Missouri New Madrid ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC-NEW 14942 Utility Boilers - Medium Sulfur Content FGD Wet Scrubber 8026 $33Missouri Jefferson DOE RUN COMPANY- HERCULANEUM SMELTER 11722 Primary Metals Industry Sulfuric Acid Plant 10653 $46

16
Emission category Control strategy Region Pollutant

Average estimated 

visibility improvement for the four 

Midwest Class I 

areas (deciviews)

Cost 

effectiveness 

($/ton)

Cost effectiveness 

per visibility 

improvement 

($million/ 

deciview)

EGU EGU1 3-State SO2 0.32 1,540 2,249

NOX 0.06 2,037 2,585

9-State SO2 0.74 1,743 2,994

NOX 0.17 1,782 2,332

EGU2 3-State SO2 0.41 1,775 2,281

NOX 0.09 3,016 3,604

9-State SO2 0.85 1,952 3,336

NOX 0.24 2,984 4,045

ICI boilers ICI1 3-State SO2 0.055 2,992 1,776

NOX 0.043 2,537 1,327

9-State SO2 0.084 2,275 2,825

NOX 0.068 1,899 2,034

ICI Workgroup 3-State SO2 0.089 2,731 1,618

NOX 0.055 3,814 1,993

9-State SO2 0.136 2,743 3,397

NOX 0.080 2,311 2,473

3-State NOX 0.015 538 282

9-State NOX 0.052 506 542

3-State NOX 0.008 754 395

9-State NOX 0.007 754 810

3-State NOX 0.037 1,286 673

9-State NOX 0.073 1,023 1,095

3-State NOX 0.011 800 419

9-State NOX 0.012 819 880

10% reduction 3-State NH3 0.10 31 - 2,700 8 - 750

9-State NH3 0.16 31 - 2,700 18 - 1,500

15% reduction 3-State NH3 0.15 31 - 2,700 8 - 750

9-State NH3 0.25 31 - 2,700 18 - 1,500

Mobile sources Low-NOX Reflash 3-State NOX 0.007 241 516

9-State NOX 0.010 241 616

MCDI 3-State NOX 0.015 10,697 7,595

9-State NOX 0.015 2,408 4,146

Anti-Idling 3-State NOX 0.009 (430) - 1,700 (410) - 1,600

9-State NOX 0.006 (430) - 1,700 (410) - 1,600

Cetane Additive Program 3-State NOX 0.009 4,119 3,155

9-State NOX 0.008 4,119 10,553

Agricultural 

sources

Table 6.5-3. Summary of Visibility Impactes and Cost Effectiveness of Potential Control Measures

Reciprocating 

engines and 

turbines

Reciprocating engines emitting 

100 tons/year or more

Turbines emitting 100 tons/year or 

more

Reciprocating engines emitting 10 

tons/year or more

Turbines emitting 10 tons/year or 

more

17

17
 18

Attachment 4: Organizations Participating in Northern Class I Consultation Process 

States and Provinces 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Iowa Department of Natural Resources 

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

North Dakota Department of Health 

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 

Ontario Ministry of the Environment 

Tribes 

Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe 

Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe 

Upper and Lower Sioux Community 

Red Lake Band of Chippewa 

Grand Portage Band of Chippewa 

Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi 

Regional Planning Organizations 

Midwest Regional Planning Organization 

Central Regional Air Planning Association 

Federal Government 

USDA Forest Service 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

National Park Service 

USDA Forest Service 

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 

18
Appendix 10B 

Conceptual Model - Causes of Haze in 

Seney Wilderness Area 
Conceptual Model - Causes of Haze in Seney Wilderness Area (SENE1) 

Regional sulfate and sulfate transported from the eastern United States are the major 

causes of haze in the Seney Wilderness Area during the warm seasons. Secondary nitrate 

from the central U.S. is responsible for most of the haze in the cold seasons. 

As shown in Figure 1, Seney Wilderness Area is located in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. 

The IMPROVE site is located at an elevation of 78 m MSL. Based on all the valid 

aerosol measurements during 2000-2004 in SENE1, the average PM2.5 mass 

concentration is 5.0 μg/m3

. The average total light extinction coefficient (Bext) is 51.6 

Mm-1 (Visual Range ~ 122 Km; Deciview ~ 14). The average contributions of the major 

aerosol components to Seney haze are particulate sulfate 42.0%, nitrate 16.2%, organic 

matter (OMC) 11.8%, elemental carbon (light absorbing carbon, LAC) 3.7%, fine soil 

0.5%, sea salt 0.2%, and coarse mass (CM) 2.3%. 

Figure 1. Terrain and land features surrounding the Seney Wilderness Area 

Sulfate is the largest aerosol contributor to light extinction during the 20% worst days, 

with a contribution of ~ 51%. Nitrate also contributes about 23% to light extinction 

during the 20% worst visibility days. Figure 2 suggests that the highest occurrence of the 

20% worst days happened in the summer from June to August, in which ~ 30% of the 

sampling days are the 20% haziest days at Seney. As shown in Figure 3, in the 20% worst 

1

1

o IMORavE Site

o JJkm EkJlfer

Class IMea

_ Lakesand Rwers

Elevation (m)

_176-2IJJ

_JJ1 -245

_246 -::65

II_. .:::.. J~'___LIO~~-'~-.~~~~~''"
visibility days, sulfate is the largest aerosol contributor to haze during the warm months 

(with a contribution of more than 60% from April to September), while nitrate is the 

largest contributor during the cold months (with a contribution of ~ 40 - 70% during 

January to March and November to December). Figure 4 indicates that during the 20% 

best days, air usually comes from north of the site; while during the 20% worst haze days, 

air usually comes from south of the site. 

Figure 2. Percentage of sampling days that are 20% worst days in each month 

Based on the PMF receptor modeling, eight source factors are identified for SENE1. 

Figure 5 illustrates the contribution of each PMF resolved source factor to PM2.5 mass at 

the site. Sulfate-rich secondary aerosol is the biggest contributor to PM2.5 mass, with a 

contribution of ~43%, followed by biomass burning smoke (20%), and nitrate-rich 

secondary (14%). Difference maps of the PMF factor score weighted and un-weighted 

residence times (Figure 6) suggest that secondary sulfate mainly transports from Midwest 

states. while smoke is mostly from biomass burning close-by and secondary nitrate is 

mostly from the central U.S. 

2

2

Pel centage of Sampling DaY" Which al e 20'/, WOISI DaY"

(Base,j on clata available in 2000-200~)

• 40%

•

0

-• 30% "0

-0 20%

•

a

•

-

c 10%

•

u

"

• 0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Month
Figure 3. Average contributions of major aerosol chemical components to light extinction 

during 20% worst days in each month 

Figure 4. Normalized residence time for 20% best (left) and 20% worst (right) days (air 

mostly transported from the blue area under the given sampling days) 

3

3

Average contributions of major aerosol chemical coml)onents to

light extinction during 20% worst days in each month

(Based on data available in 2000-2004)

• IMPROYl: sKe

Total Residence Time: best 20~~

DNoendpoinis

00-0.007

DO.em-o-01S

00.015.0,03

00.030-0.07

_0.07-0,14

.0.14-028

.0.28-0,84

tlXlmsl",rtingh,,;gl"t

• IMPROVE ste

Total Residence Tin-.e; WOlst 2tY.

DNoendpoiris

0°. 0,007

00.007-0-015

00-015-0-03

00.03O-0.D7

.0,07-0.14

.0.14-0.28

.0.28_0.64
Figure 5. Average contributions of PMF resolved source factors to PM2.5 mass 

concentration. 

 

Figure 6. Difference maps of the PMF source factor (sulfate-rich secondary source factor 

on the top left, biomass smoke source factor on the top right, and nitrate-rich secondary 

on the bottom left) weighted and un-weighted residence times. 

4

4

Smoke

20%

Construction

5%

Dust

8%

Nitrate-rich

Secondary

14%

Iron Industry

3%

Mobile

4%

Sulfate-rich

Secondary

43%

_(l.I~ 0.0&1

_tlOO1 •.{l,I1.l'J

elon 000007'

71.0ooסס1.)

(10..01'

.OW·001$

_0.0150,14

.0.14.0.24

.. tlI4PROVC ue

PMI- Sltll)kr..I_hlWl)i!JI"~1

I

"

,~

• 'I!(I

~In IINtlng hdglll

• I"'PI'IQ~~~

p,.:: Sennd.llyHOJ -Ullwel'!lI~'8t.

_.,.1 . .0)17

4.41--0.2

.(Il·.QJ)14

.0014.1)

O·OM

_0(1(1$.0,(14'

_0061.01e.

_01'.04
Appendix 10C 

Seney And Isle Royale Area 

Visibility Information 
 Isle Royale National Park – 20% Worst Visibility Days 

Note, possible fire impact days include June 10 and 28, 2002, July 

19, 2002, and July 17, 2004 (i.e., days with very high OC concentrations) 

1

2

Isle Royale National Park (New), 2OClO, Worst. Days

! :~ •

i ~. n Ii .1 .r • • ~..-• . .

••• " ' .. " •• " ,

__•••• " ,II " ,.1 " ' .... 00" '"00''' _ '., .., '., '11111-,-,== ', ' ', ' , ••• " ' , ' oo ,•• , oo, " '0'" or.'"" " ,. " ' ,. , ,. ' . ,J""J",.,•• ,••• ".".""••••••••••••• ".~ ••"""""'""",••••••••••• 0000000000""""""""""0000000000 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••, •• ,.,•••••••••••• uu.u.uu.u.uu.u.uu••••••••• ccccccccccoooooooooo •••••••••• """"""""" ••••••••, ••• ".,.".,.,•• ,." •••,,""""""""LLLLlLLL'OO""""""""""""""cccccccccc

Isle Royale National Park (NeoN), 2001, Worst Days -~ --- -

[L i j . .. j ••• '" ,,, ', " ...00' ", ' ', ' ', ' " ' ", ",••• '" ' '" ' " ' " ' .... " , ' ,., , to , , ",,, , , •• ' ,., ,., ' 10 ,. ' •• ,.,. "",J"",••••••••,"•••"" "•••""""""""", 00000000000""""""""""000000000 ..............................................u.u.u••u.u.u••u.u.u••u.u uu •••••••••cccccccccccoooooooooo . """"".".""" , ,.,.,.".,""""""".""LLlLlLLLL.UU ","""T'.' , ccccccccc

Isle Royale National

-~ Park (New), 2002, Worst. Days--- -

11...",.,., ".".""" ..,., """,',..,., ..1,,., ,.,~: ""..,.d~J.L., ,.,. ,..,., li".."":,,.;;.!,,,c.c,c, ,., ,.,,,•••••,,,.c.c.!!, ,., ,., c•••••••o••,.,,!I,.~,W,., , J JJJ"""""'" , """"" """"••• ••J" JJ""""""" JJ '0000000000""""."""" "00000000000 ....................................................u.uuuuuuuu••••••••uuuuuuuu.uu ccccccccccoooooooooo . """""""""" "."." """".""."""""""LLLLLLLLllLO••O••O T""",,'vvvv ccccccccccc

Isle Royale National

-~ Park (New), 2003, Worst. Days--- -

t.......,,',., ,.,J ,,Ui,,,, .. " 10' •• '"" '",. ,.," ' " ,,,: ,. "....)l.!,

'

!\.•.,o.l;.,:~ ,.,c.c.c.!:\,c.c, ,. ',.llJJ ,. , ,., .. ""J"" ""'" ,••""." ~.,"'" ""'" "'" , 0000000000"""""." ••"0000000000 ...............................................u.u.u••u.u.u••u.u.u.uuuuuuuu••••••••ccccccccccoooooooooo . """""""""" , •••,., "".,.,.""""""""""LLLlLlLLLUU """""., ,.cccccccccc

Isle Royale National

-~ Park (New), 2004, Worst. Days--- -

II iJ :: ..".iiil .. :::i :: ii .... ', ", ", ' ",,, ,," ", ," '"" , " '.." " ,,' .. ,. , T ,., ,. , •••••• ' , ,. , •••• , , •• ,., ,. , , .. " ' ., , ", , •••, .. JJ""""""", """" "" ••,""'JJ'""""" oOOOOOOOOO""""""••••DOOOOOOooo ........................................................UUUUUUU"u••••••u.UUUUUUUy occccccccccoooooooooO II. """"""""" ""..",, "", " ••".".""""L LLLLLLLLLO~'O<I~~~O"""'''''''''' TTl Tl"", cccccccccc

-~ --- -
Seney National Wildlife Refuge – 20% Worst Visibility Days 

2

3

Seney, 2000, Worst Days

• • •

-ULill ;..,. . p. -I.

: ••• , , , ... 00 , , " ••••,-==-c=I~ , , ' , , " , , , ' , , ~~~..-c+=~~~""I'-=""" ..... ' , " , .. , • , , , ' .......",,,•• 0 , , ' .... 0'" , , .. "

' •••••••••••••,. , •• ' , •• I ' 0'" , •• , •• ' ••••••••••••••• , ••••••• ,. , •••• ,. , ••••••• ,., 0> •• JJ"",J••• " ••• MMMMMMM ••••••••• UMMMMMMMJ"J"JJ,JJ,JJ" •••••••••••000.00••••••••••••• 000 ••• 000

••••••••••••••••••••••• ",•••••••••••••• """"""""""""""UUUUUUM •••••• eccecc ••••••,o•••••••••••••• •••U"" ••••• o. 0 ••• " ••••• "" ••• ".".,.",.y, ••••••• C, L" l L' L •• GOG •••, •• , l "" T "'••••".vee ecccec e e

-

LJ

Seney,

-~ 2001, Worst Days --- i :~ . .

'00'" ' 0.,' " ",.to", , ,., ,., , _".00_' ,....... ', " " ,' ", """"" , ".' " ... ,,, ,. " ..,. ,., ,." ' ,., ,.,.,.. ,. ' ,." ,.. ,. ' , '". , J J J J 'JJ J J J " ••••,. ,~"~~~"""~~ ~"~~~"~"~~~JJ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J OOOOOOOOOOO""HHHH""HHOOOOOOOOO .................................................UUU"""UUU"""UUU"U"UUU""UUU""I,,,," ••eoooeooo<oeooooooOOOO"""'" "~HHHNN~HH"" YVY,,' YH" H"""~H"H"'" ""'0000000000 ", "'" T,'v,..vvv , ..ee««eeo

Seney, 2002, Worst Days -~ --- -

-I ; -

i~ 0""" '''0''''''i ", '" ',' ..,.", '" "'0"" ,..".'", ~.'" ", '" " ", '." • ..... ,. ,.,. '" ," '" ," ,. " ' , ,. " , , ' , J J J J J J ,.", " ,~"~ ~~~~" ""~~~~.."~"J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J JA" "OOOOOOOOOOH""""N""""OOOOOOOOOOO ..................................................UU""""UUUU",,,,""UUUU",,"""UU"U ««eee«ooooooOOOOo . "~~~"H""NN nn"., VYNN~~HH"""""'" "000..0000 " '" • • "".vvvv.,,, .«««««<

Seney,

-~ 2003, Worst Days --- -

i i iiG i j • [;. • .. 0""" ".",." '", ", ' " '" ", '" " " '., ..".'" 10 •• ", '" .. ••••••,. '0'" " '0'" ,••••••, ' '.0•••,. '0 ••••••,•••••• ,•••••••••'••••••,. '•••••••,. '0'" ,. ,••••••• " ••••• , J J J J J J J >'", , ,~~""~""~~~~ "~""~~.. J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J ,0000000000HOHH"""N~"000OOOOooo

..............I1 ""UUUUU""""UUUUU,,,,"""UUUU,,""""u «<o«««ooooooOOOO.II . "~~~HH"""N' vynv. HHH""NNHO"" ""'" ..000000000 "", TT' .'v" vvvvv vv«««««

Seney,

-~ 2004, Worst Days --- -

-j ; -

i - ...

... '" 0""'"U.~ll ,•••'" ' " ' '" .', " ".',,,, Jil:J~ " "" ', " "", wi~i',,, ", , . ,. ' ' ,., ,. ,••••••• , , .. " ,••••••• , ".,., , ,.,••••••• , ,., " , "'0 " .., .. , >J J J J J J J J J""" """"~~~"" """"""""""JJ J J J J J J J J J J J JJ J J J J J OOooOOOOOO"HHHO"""""OOOOOOOoo .................I1 "UU"""""""UUUUUUUU"""""""UU"UUU"",,,,,,«««««ooooooOOOO''''"II' "HHHHHHHH~MO "" ""n'VYH"HHHH~"HO""'""..oooooooooo "" ••• ",'vv",,,.vv«<<<<<<<

-~ --- -
Isle Royale National Park – All Days 

3

4

•

Isle Royale National Pari< (NeoN), 2000

-~

•

·

:' _i - ii .i __ ., _1_1 -r- -. -- _-__ - -----

'0 •• ' ".~ .!~!~~~!=::Wf; ::~~, :~;:;:r:~,:;:~:" :;~;!::!!7;~m:~"., ..•.,,' ...,•.•. ',..,.••" ,' ,•.•" ,.,.. , ".,.. , ' , ,..,'.,.." .. ' " ..' ,. , ,., ,., ,., .. .. " ,.I ,.1.1, ,. ,.' ' •• M"MM"MMMM.U ••••••MMM"MMMM"' ,.I, ,.I," ,.I,'" ,J OOOOOOOOOO"H"HH"H""HOOOOOOOOOO .................................., UUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUU UUU U••••••••••eeeeeeec eeOOOOOOOOOO'" ••••••• HH""HH"HHO , ••, ••,.,••, ••,."y, ",y'"""HMHH"""'" ,'UUOOOOO,••, """"" ••••' eceececcec

-- Isle Royale National Pari< (New), 2001 -~

__e.- _s...SoIl

-

§a· : I "-J1I]~ _._ i :"i - in. _ I _- "; -- ~I-C-i'-';-;~-'-I-- J~_..--~~_~_:~._~__.i_-l_ ~~~-. -••--1.;:; - - - - - 0'''''' '" ,,' '" ' '" , " ' ', " ', " "" '", '" '""" ,. , ' ,., '., ,., ,., ' ,., ,., " , ,. , ,. , , ,., , .. .I .I .I,"" ,.I.I"'" HHIOMMM MMM H M'" ,.I.I,"" ,.I .I "'" " 00000000000HH"""""""HOOO•••0000 ................................" uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu eeeeeeecceeoooooooooo . NHHHHH"""H" .........", " ....",. " ",,nn,,' 'H""HHHHHHH' """" '0000000000 n """ n T'" .......eeececccee

-- -~

__e.- _s...SoIl

Isle Royale National Pari< (NeoN), 2002

- -

=[ .~ ill - - - :' "_-- __"_-ii.-" __-".. ."- ";oh::~~;:;;;:~~~!,;;;;~:~~;;~;:;,~~~;~;:;;;~~,,:~~•••,~~, ~;:~~~'::;;: .." " ', ;:!:7;.:::::~:: ,;..;;:,,:,,;.. ...,., ,., , , , ,., ,., ' ,., ,., ,., ,., , ' .1.1 .I,"'" " •••",' MMMMM MMM H""" ,.I .I," '" ,.I .I .I,,, ooOOOOOooH""""HH"""••Ooooooo•• .............• , , uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu" ,eecceeeeeeooooooo000, , NHHHH"H""H " " "" " ,nn. HHHH"""""H" """U '00000••000 ",T' T" ececeeeeeec

-- -~

__e.- _s...SoIl

Isle Royale National Pari< (NeoN), 2003

-

=[ - iLL JJ- ;- • •. - . • .1 ..• ., -_-- -~-- - -1-- -:__11 ~-, __• __1, 1-- -,-_ - ,~--

'u:" ,.;;;:;.:" ::;,; ,:,,, " ,.......", '," '""," '" "'i..' ", ", .. H ••••'.,•••• , ,., ' , ,.,•••• , ,.,•••• , ' ,., ,., , ,., ..

JJJJJ"",.,""'..H"" HM MM H"H MMMMM""",JJJJ.""",,, ""OOOOQOO()QOHH"""""""".ooooooooo ..........", " uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUUUUUU"UU..I ,lcccceeeeeeooo•••ooOO 1I11 NHHHHHHHHH ,,,"'"" ",'""""""""H""""'" , •••••••••00 '", '" T" ""'" ccceeeeeee

-- -~

__e.- _s...SoIl

Isle Royale National Pari< (NeoN), 2004

-

i [,~;; ,. , ,.;;;:J;~;:;; ' ,., ,. , , ;!;!:;.!. ..' ,;,;;;

,. ,

..;.::;;;;;.:b:;.;;

,., ,. , .,;!!!;!;;,: " , , ,,)!.:,J;;' , ;;:.;,,~.,.

,~;. ' ,i!;!;;;;;;;;,.

, ' J.. .I .I .I,"" ,.I.I"'" ' HMMMMM M MMMM H M'" ,.I.I,"" ,.I .I .I,'" " " ..OoooooooooHHH""""""HOOO•••oooo .............., uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu , eeeeeecceeooo.oooooo••", .. NHHHHH"""H" ",,, " " ,"'"" ' 'H""HHHHHHH' """" 00000 " '" , T' TT'''' eeececccee

-- -~

__e.- _s...SoIl

-
Seney National Wildlife Refuge – All Days 

4

5

Seney, 2000

i ~w:JjJ",,,-;~~~~~~~,,=:,*L;!;;L~, 00'" ' ", ""••"'7';"';" ", , ', ' ", " ', , , ""'0"" '-!:!,:~;Ji~. .""~J _--,-J ', ",.. ' t to"., .• , '. 0' '0' ,0> '0' ,•• ,'.,.." •• ' ' ,. ,., .0 ••• '.' ,., ,., . • " JJ J.lJ J , •••• ' •• MM""M"M"".U ••••••""""""""", 'J J 'J J" JJ J' J J " 00.0000.""""""" ••• 0.0000000• ••• ••• I •••••••••••••••••••, UNUU"""U"U" U """"""""U" "U" U ••••••••••eoeeeeec ceOOOOOOOOOOI •• I "'" I

H •••NH""U , •••••, •••••••••"" ""V"""MMH""" lL' lL Leu..o , ••, ••••••"" Il'" T.V••'V C.C,.C

- __e.- _s...SoIl

Seney, 2001 -- -~

-u ! .

. - -

i ~_ 'i-'i--;-i ~-i---o-;--i: . •••'", ", ""'0'" " , , .", " ' ' .. '''''00 ' ,., '" tI .. .. , ' " .., , , , , ,., ,., , , , , . JJJ"'" 'JJ M MM M M " J"'" 'JJ"'" 'JJ'" OOOOOOOOOOO•••HN•••••OOOOOOOOOO .....................................................uuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu cccooccccecoooooooooo ..

" •••HMM••N ,n..",n ' •••N••••••, """"'0••••0000•••••••••••",T""" ,.v"' vocceccoooo

-- -~

__e.- _Soo. SoIl

Seney, 2002

-

J ._J-~ ..--- i li---b- __.. ilri.-.--:------/:---: _~ ,i,i,., ....,' '", ', '", , ," '" ',' ,.." ', ,.. " .. ...,." , , " , , , ' , ,..' , ' ' JJJ""", M MM ""JJ"""JJ,"",J OooOOOOOOO ••••••••••OOOOOOOOOOO ....................................................uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu cceccceeccoooooooooo .

" •••H.M••N ",' •••••••••• " """" '00000•••00 ••••••••••""" T T T, V, ,ececceeecec

-- -~

Seney, 2000

-

i =[•••.",--i: , i.J-iLl---Ai- ', ',,, ' -'-,--i""-"'U-" ',' ' '0"""' ,." .1,-,=.-.~-,-li~-l- •••. " -,~, ".,J. ........, ' ,' ' ,, ' , , , ' ,., " " .. JJJ JJJ"" ,JJJ"""'"" 'JJJJ' 0000000000••••••••••0000000000 ....................................................uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu ccecccceecooooooOOoo .. " ,'..nnn ••••••••••, '- '- '-"",'000.0 """"l VVVT" ,",vececceeeee

-- -~

Seney, 2004

-

it.__. "i:l--i-:-i-. •__,J: --, ., ,[iii . , •• _ .1. ill-i_ i " ] .... ", ,. ""00'" , , '" ''''00'''' ' 0 ' ,., " .. " .. , "." , , , ,.,. " , ,., , ,., ,., ,., ,.., .. JJJ"'" 'JJ ,JJ"'" 'JJ"'" 'JJ'" 0000000000••••••••••0000000000 .....................................................uuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu cceeccccccoooooooooo .. " •••H••••N n ..",n ' •••N••••••, '" '- '-,,,'0•••00000.0 • .........,,,""" 'vv"' ccceccecee

-- -~

__e.- _Soo. SoIl -
Appendix 10D 

 

 

 

 

 

Calpuff Modeling, Q/D And Visibility 

For Isle Royale 
Back trajectory analysis indicate where air is most likely and least likely to come 

from on the 20% worst days. As indicated in Figures 10.2.b, Illinois, Indiana, 

Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin have the majority of impact 

for the worst 20% days at Isle Royale. 

Figure 10.2.b: Composite back trajectories for Isle Royale for the 20% worst 

days. Orange is where the air is most likely to come from and green is where it is 

least like to come from. 

1

2
Table 1. Calpuff modeling for Isle Royale, includes only facilities located in the 

state of Michigan.

ISLE ROYALE CLASS I AREA 

FACILITY SRN 

1/(Mm) 

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY B4261 0.775 

EMPIRE IRON MINING PARTNERSHIP B1827 0.766 

Tilden Mining Company L.C. B4885 0.209 

STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION A5754 0.205 

J. H. Campbell Plant B2835 0.088 

DETROIT EDISON/MONROE POWER B2816 0.084 

ESCANABA PAPER COMPANY A0884 0.067 

Marquette Board of Light & Power B1833 0.064 

Neenah Paper - Michigan, Inc. B1470 0.046 

Lafarge North America - Alpena Plant B1477 0.040 

Karn - Weadock Facility B2840 0.039 

ST MARYS CEMENT INC B1559 0.033 

ESCANABA POWER PLANT B1573 0.025 

B. C. Cobb Plant B2836 0.024 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO B7192 0.021 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #8 N3760 0.017 

DETROIT EDISON TRENTON CHANNEL B2811 0.017 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #7 N2168 0.015 

ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER POWER PLANT B2796 0.015 

J.R. WHITING CO B2846 0.013 

ANR Pipeline Company - Bridgman Compressor Station N5575 0.011 

Holland BPW, Generating Station & WWTP B2357 0.008 

MANISTIQUE PAPERS INC A6475 0.008 

DETROIT EDISON RIVER ROUGE B2810 0.007 

HOLCIM (US) INC. B1743 0.007 

Packaging Corporation of America - Filer City Mill B3692 0.006 

Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, LLC A3900 0.006 

TES FILER CITY STATION N1685 0.006 

S. D. Warren, Muskegon, MI, Operations A4203 0.006 

Traverse City Light and Power Bayside Power Plant B4257 0.005 

Eckert & Moores Park Station B2647 0.004 

General Chemical Industrial Products Inc. B1821 0.004 

ANR Pipeline Company - Hamilton Compressor Station N5574 0.004 

Morton Salt Specialty Magnesia B1824 0.004 

MENOMINEE PAPER COMPANY B1855 0.003 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - Manistee Sulfur Plant B6013 0.003 

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation N1315 0.003 

U S STEEL GREAT LAKES WORKS A7809 0.003 

Michigan State University K3249 0.002 

Lansing Board of Water & Light, Erickson Station B4001 0.002 

Decorative Panels International, Inc B1476 0.002 

DETROIT EDISON GREENWOOD ENERGY CENTER B6145 0.001 

Midland Cogeneration Venture B6527 0.001 

J. B. Sims Generating Station B1976 0.001 

ANR Pipeline Co - Woolfolk Compressor Station B7220 0.001 

2

3
FACILITY SRN 

1/(Mm) 

FARWELL COMPRESSOR STATION NO 12 N5581 0.001 

Pharmacia & Upjohn Co LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer B3610 0.001 

ANR-Coldsprings/ Blue Lake Gas Storage Company B7198 0.001 

DEARBORN INDUSTRIAL GENERATION N6631 0.001 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #9 N3759 0.001 

East Jordan Iron Works A0767 0.001 

GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES B1877 0.001 

Michigan Sugar Company - Carrollton Factory B2874 0.001 

Merit Energy Company. - Mayfield 23 B5587 0.001 

Harbor Beach Power Plant B2815 0.001 

Reed City Compressor Station B3721 0.001 

Merit Energy Co. - Brown 7 B5589 0.001 

KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY N2955 0.001 

WYANDOTTE DEPT MUNI POWER B2132 0.001 

MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM A9831 0.001 

White Pigeon Paper Company B2024 0.001 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION - ORION ASSEMBLY B7227 0.001 

GREAT LAKES TISSUE B1563 0.001 

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Station #11 B8573 0.001 

Viking Energy of McBain N1160 0.001 

ANR Pipeline Company Lincoln Compressor Station N5586 0.001 

Delphi Saginaw Steering Systems, Holland Road A6175 0.000 

GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC. B1678 0.000 

Michigan Sugar Company - Sebewaing Factory B2873 0.000 

Aztec Producing Company, Inc. B7093 0.000 

Steelcase Inc. - Grand Rapids Complex N0980 0.000 

HILLMAN POWER CO N1266 0.000 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #10 N3758 0.000 

Muskegon River Compressor Station N2901 0.000 

TAGGART COMPRESSOR STATION N3392 0.000 

JAGUAR ENERGY, FREDERIC 15 GAS PLANT B7222 0.000 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - OTSEGO LAKE 34 N0200 0.000 

Michigan Sugar Company, Caro Factory B2875 0.000 

Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC B4288 0.000 

CMS ANTRIM GAS L.L.C. N2940 0.000 

Michigan Power Limited Partnership N4975 0.000 

QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC. - P-LEASE N3190 0.000 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - KALKASKA GAS PLANT B4292 0.000 

Cadillac Renewable Energy Facility N1395 0.000 

Ludlow Coated Products B2013 0.000 

GRAYLING GENERATING STATION LTD PTNR N2388 0.000 

Overisel Compressor Station N5792 0.000 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES-ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION A6380 0.000 

SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC. A8640 0.000 

GMC-MFD Grand Blanc Metal Fab Plant B1610 0.000 

VIKING ENERGY OF LINCOLN, INC. N0890 0.000 

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY- WHITE PIGEON CO N5573 0.000 

3

4
FACILITY SRN 

1/(Mm) 

Hanson Brick - Michigan Plant A6497 0.000 

GM POWERTRAIN GROUP - SAGINAW METAL 

CASTING B1991 0.000 

Michigan Sugar Company, Croswell Factory B2876 0.000 

E.B. EDDY PAPER INC. B6420 0.000 

MI SO CENTRAL POWER AGENCY B6611 0.000 

SUMMIT ESSEXVILLE INC N0827 0.000 

CARGILL SALT A6240 0.000 

DETROIT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT B2103 0.000 

CARMEUSE LIME/ RIVER ROUGE B2169 0.000 

DETROIT THERMAL BEACON HEATING PLANT B2814 0.000 

General Motors Pontiac Site Operations B4032 0.000 

BELLE RIVER COMPRESSOR STATION B6478 0.000 

GREATER DETROIT RESOURCE RECOVERY M4148 0.000 

MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT--HEADQUARTERS OIL 

FIELD N0924 0.000 

KINDER MORGAN CO N6626 0.000 

The Dow Chemical Company U.S.A., Midland A4033 0.000 

DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION A8638 0.000 

Michigan Sugar Company - Bay City B1493 0.000 

QUANEX CORP MACSTEEL DIVISION B4306 0.000 

MID MICHIGAN GAS STORAGE CO - CAPAC B6481 0.000 

ST. CLAIR COMPRESSOR STATION B6637 0.000 

Central Michigan University K2460 0.000 

Kent County Waste to Energy Facility N1604 0.000 

ADA COGENERATION N1784 0.000 

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Station #13 N3818 0.000 

Howell Compressor Station N5572 0.000 

Menasha Packaging Company, LLC, Otsego Mill A0023 0.000 

Kellogg USA Inc. A0563 0.000 

IPMC AQUISITION LLC A7051 0.000 

FORD MOTOR CO/ WAYNE COMPLEX A8650 0.000 

General Motors Corporation - Van Slyke Complex B1606 0.000 

DETROIT PUBLIC LIGHTING B2185 0.000 

CARMEUSE/DETROIT LIME B3520 0.000 

GM Technical Center B4049 0.000 

CENTRAL WAYNE ENERGY RECOVERY B4281 0.000 

Hyperion Energy, Rich Field Gas Plant B5462 0.000 

Western Michigan University K2131 0.000 

UNIVERSITY OF MI M0675 0.000 

GENERAL MOTORS HAMTRAMCK M4199 0.000 

FORD MOTOR CO ELM ST BOILERHOUSE M4764 0.000 

EQ-SITE #2 M4782 0.000 

DaimlerChrysler Technology Center N1436 0.000 

ONYX-ARBOR HILLS LANDFILL N2688 0.000 

GENESEE POWER STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP N3570 0.000 

FREEDOM COMPRESSOR STATION N3920 0.000 

4

5
Table 2. Top 30 facilities contributing to decreased visibility at Seney, includes 

facilities in and out of state. 

 Area Deciviews State County Facility ID Facility Name 

5

6

I'· '1 =, • - ~.

".

"'-"I

'1

...-". • - ,= ~-- - "t<1cnlll<

"'-"I .<31"'

"'-"I

"' =i!'.. ~- =. "' """"",, ". '1 om '''''''cnlll< _b

". '1 m" ". '1 Em

"' -

'''''''1(''''' "'<XOO>O --- "' "'-"I =, , ".

".

'1

'1

~, "' """"30 '"''''''''''''0 -

"'

"m • om

"'-"I .,""". • - ",m

"'-"I .,,"" "' - " "'

"'-"I ,- "' - • "' ". '1 .~

" ",. " "'

"'-"I .'4'" • ". '1 .~ • .~ .- - - , IN .. _

"'-"I .= • - moo

". '1 13l7:l

-"

• ". '1 "m

"'"' ~- " - , "'

"'-"I .= " - • "'

"'-"I

". '1

."' -- ""''''''''' .- - -- ""'''''''' ~~

". '1

- • - • m

"'-"I ."',.. -- "''''''''"'' _I"""","

". '1 .. , - m_

".

"'-"I

'1

_. •• - ~~ =- • ",m

~- "'-"I m. -- "''''''''''' "'-"I -, -- ""'''''''''' "'-"I .0'" 00

- _. ,.,,,

""""

•
Table 3 2018 Q/d EGUs for Isle Royale for facilities in and out of state. 

Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

(km) 

Class 

I Area

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

1 26 Mich 103 Marquette B4261 Wisconsin Electric 736.05 769.94 113 ISLE1 0.141 16 0.342 38

2 26 Mich 147 St_Clair B2796 St. Clair / Belle 1175.6 406.81 681 ISLE1 0.088 60.2 0.367 249

3 27 Minn 141 Sherburne 2714100004 Nsp - Sherburne Ge 242.98 601.12 498 ISLE1 0.109 54.3 0.146 7

4 18 Indi 147 Spencer 20 Indiana Michigan P 868.79 -182.36 1062 ISLE1 0.056 59.1 0.183 193

5 27 Minn 61 Itasca 2706100004 Minnesota Power In 250.45 815.4 420 ISLE1 0.056 23.5 0.176 73

6 55 Wisc 11 Buffalo 606034110 Dairyland Power Co 412.92 490.06 450 ISLE1 0.049 21.9 0.172 77

7 55 Wisc 117 Sheboygan 460033090 Wp & L Alliant Ene 726.01 448.45 416 ISLE1 0.047 19.5 0.158 6

8 17 Illi 197 Will 197809AAO Midwest Generation 754.82 201.22 665 ISLE1 0.043 28.3 0.169 112

9 55 Wisc 21 Columbia 111003090 Alliant Energy-Col 604.68 417.45 448 ISLE1 0.036 16 0.198 88

10 55 Wisc 73 Marathon 737009020 Wis Public Service 581.37 565 308 ISLE1 0.042 13 0.133 4

11 29 Miss 71 Franklin 3 Amerenue-Labadie P 533.09 -140.88 1011 ISLE1 0.034 34.7 0.216 218

12 13 Geor 207 Monroe 20700008 Georgia Power Comp 1227.2 -681.37 1640 ISLE1 0.036 58.4 0.197 322

13 21 Kent 145 McCracken 2114500006 Tva-Environmental 725.03 -282.55 1145 ISLE1 0.052 59.1 0.091 104

14 26 Mich 115 Monroe B2816 Detroit Edison/Mon 1122.4 293.92 726 ISLE1 0.029 21.1 0.253 183

15 26 Mich 139 Ottawa B2835 J. H. Campbell Pla 875.41 374.7 528 ISLE1 0.028 14.9 0.304 160

16 18 Indi 73 Jasper 8 Nipsco - R.M. Scha 829.67 180.7 699 ISLE1 0.031 21.8 0.136 95

17 31 Nebr 111 Lincoln 19 Nppd Gerald Gentle -346 127.9 1251 ISLE1 0.054 67.2 0.078 9818 27 Minn 31 Cook 2703100001 Minnesota Power - 456.12 868.74 212 ISLE1 0.036 7.7 0.091 1919 20 Kans 107 Linn 5 Kansas City Power 204.64 -180.37 1140 ISLE1 0.101 114.9 0.066 75

20 40 Okla 101 Muskogee 1209 Og&E 153.25 -468.02 1425 ISLE1 0.044 63.4 0.068 96

21 38 Nort 57 Mercer 11 Antelope Valley -366.4 829.12 1035 ISLE1 0.034 34.8 0.075 77

22 17 Illi 197 Will 197810AAK Midwest Generation 739.33 216.94 648 ISLE1 0.025 16.4 0.110 71

23 29 Miss 183 St_Charles 1 Amerenue-Sioux Pla 577.43 -98.68 964 ISLE1 0.024 23.5 0.113 108

24 26 Mich 17 Bay B2840 Karn - Weadock Fac 1054 480.5 542 ISLE1 0.024 12.7 0.129 69

25 26 Mich 163 Wayne B2810 Detroit Edison Riv 1135 338.82 700 ISLE1 0.028 19.5 0.085 59

26 5 Arka 63 Independen 506300042 Entergy Ark-Indepe 492.48 -457.61 1330 ISLE1 0.038 50.8 0.062 81

27 40 Okla 131 Rogers 212 Public Svc Co Of O 116 -394.96 1372 ISLE1 0.037 50.3 0.065 89

28 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405031990 Wi Public Service 711.56 538.78 325 ISLE1 0.031 10.1 0.069 22

29 38 Nort 65 Oliver 1 Milton R Young -320.9 792.72 992 ISLE1 0.069 68.5 0.049 48

30 26 Mich 163 Wayne B2811 Detroit Edison Tre 1132 321.47 711 ISLE1 0.021 15.1 0.113 80

31 48 Texa 449 Titus 3 Monticello Stm Ele 183.02 -764.16 1696 ISLE1 0.023 39.7 0.088 14832 10 Dela 5 Sussex 1000500001 Indian River Gener 1865.7 68.12 1436 ISLE1 0.025 36.5 0.075 107

33 55 Wisc 79 Milwaukee 241007800 Wis Electric Power 735.39 372.57 493 ISLE1 0.024 11.8 0.081 39

34 21 Kent 177 Muhlenberg 2117700006 Tva Paradise Steam 881.29 -254.8 1136 ISLE1 0.020 22.4 0.119 13

35 22 Loui 77 Pointe_Cou 5 La Generating Llc/ 541.11 -1012.9 1878 ISLE1 0.022 41.6 0.083 156

36 46 Sout 51 Grant 1001 Big Stone 38.52 588.77 686 ISLE1 0.061 41.9 0.045 3

37 48 Texa 401 Rusk 11 Martin Lake Electr 228.94 -855.56 1772 ISLE1 0.031 54.6 0.058 10338 19 Iowa 179 Wapello 90-07-001 Ipl - Ottumwa Gene 370.37 130.73 789 ISLE1 0.024 19.1 0.073 57

39 21 Kent 41 Carroll 2104100010 Kentucky Utilities 1030.3 -70.65 999 ISLE1 0.020 20.2 0.091 90

40 39 Ohio 113 Montgomery 857780013 Dp&L, O.H. Hutchin 1080.8 32.2 926 ISLE1 0.022 20.1 0.081 74

6
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class 

I Area

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

41 54 West 79 Putnam 6 Appalachian Power 1309.8 -59.75 1122 ISLE1 0.024 26.9 0.072 81

42 19 Iowa 193 Woodbury 97-04-010 Midamerican Energy 50.9 257.79 863 ISLE1 0.022 19.2 0.077 66

43 20 Kans 149 Pottawatom 1 Westar Energy, Inc 76.41 -78.82 1111 ISLE1 0.067 74.3 0.043 47

44 31 Nebr 55 Douglas 2 Omaha Public Power 87.56 147.4 920 ISLE1 0.030 27.6 0.057 52

45 35 New 45 San_Juan 2 Four Corners -1017 -302.17 2048 ISLE1 0.062 127.9 0.042 86

46 18 Indi 89 Lake 117 Nipsco - Dean H. M 792.89 223.83 649 ISLE1 0.021 13.4 0.079 51

47 5 Arka 69 Jefferson 506900110 Entergy Ark-White 444.95 -604.3 1482 ISLE1 0.019 27.8 0.091 134

48 55 Wisc 3 Ashland 802033320 Northern States Po 470.9 749.06 227 ISLE1 0.021 4.7 0.073 16

49 18 Indi 29 Dearborn 2 American Electric 1040.1 -31.95 967 ISLE1 0.025 24.1 0.060 57

50 40 Okla 97 Mayes 799 Grand River Dam Au 152.96 -420.36 1381 ISLE1 0.033 45.3 0.046 6351 31 Nebr 131 Otoe 36 Oppd Nebraska City 102.73 69.51 973 ISLE1 0.031 30.1 0.046 4

52 18 Indi 43 Floyd 4 Psi Energy - Galla 968.21 -132.21 1037 ISLE1 0.022 22.5 0.067 69

53 19 Iowa 115 Louisa 58-07-001 Midamerican Energy 491.15 161.82 721 ISLE1 0.022 16 0.064 4

54 17 Illi 97 Lake 097190AAC Midwest Generation 737.64 294.2 571 ISLE1 0.019 10.8 0.078 4455 30 Mont 87 Rosebud 14 Colstrip -745.5 692.28 1424 ISLE1 0.070 99.4 0.035 50

56 19 Iowa 155 Pottawatta 78-01-026 Midamerican Energy 96.67 131.21 927 ISLE1 0.023 21.8 0.059 54

57 29 Miss 189 St_Louis 10 Amerenue-Meramec P 577.8 -155.79 1021 ISLE1 0.020 20.4 0.071 7258 54 West 33 Harrison 15 Monongahela Power 1420.2 62.14 1097 ISLE1 0.026 28.7 0.050 55

59 29 Miss 175 Randolph 1 Associated Electri 372.28 -40.81 949 ISLE1 0.023 22.2 0.057 54

60 17 Illi 179 Tazewell 179801AAA Midwest Generation 623.59 83.59 779 ISLE1 0.015 11.8 0.109 85

61 39 Ohio 81 Jefferson 641160017 W. H. Sammis Plant 1370.1 182.63 976 ISLE1 0.037 36.4 0.036 35

62 1 Alab 127 Walker 1 Alabama Power Comp 905.95 -655.15 1535 ISLE1 0.021 32.7 0.056 8

63 38 Nort 57 Mercer 1 Leland Olds -333.9 817.63 1003 ISLE1 0.045 45.6 0.033 33

64 1 Alab 73 Jefferson 10730011 Alabama Power Comp 918.55 -655.58 1537 ISLE1 0.014 20.8 0.098 15165 38 Nort 55 McLean 17 Coal Creek -315 827.45 984 ISLE1 0.016 15.6 0.077 7666 26 Mich 121 Muskegon B2836 B. C. Cobb Plant 867.65 412.1 491 ISLE1 0.015 7.2 0.085 41

67 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 16 Amerenue-Rush Isla 585.2 -185.06 1049 ISLE1 0.014 14.6 0.086 90

68 18 Indi 51 Gibson 13 Psi Energy - Gibso 800.1 -139.75 1009 ISLE1 0.021 21.1 0.049 49

69 18 Indi 167 Vigo 21 Psi Energy - Wabas 816.7 -9.44 883 ISLE1 0.020 18 0.050 43

70 17 Illi 31 Cook 031600AIN Midwest Generation 740.23 258.24 607 ISLE1 0.017 10.1 0.064 3

71 39 Ohio 31 Coshocton 616000000 Conesville Power P 1273.1 126.55 951 ISLE1 0.017 15.9 0.060 57

72 35 New 45 San_Juan 902 San Juan -1004 -291.61 2031 ISLE1 0.038 77.5 0.033 66

73 40 Okla 103 Noble 1211 Og&E -4.49 -392.21 1422 ISLE1 0.026 37.4 0.039 55

74 19 Iowa 5 Allamakee 03-03-001 Ipl - Lansing Gene 470.71 385.08 515 ISLE1 0.019 9.8 0.054 27

75 18 Indi 77 Jefferson 1 Ikec - Clifty Cree 996.96 -75.84 993 ISLE1 0.012 12 0.100 99

76 26 Mich 115 Monroe B2846 J.R. Whiting Co 1115.6 281.92 732 ISLE1 0.016 12 0.060 4377 17 Illi 137 Morgan 137805AAA Ameren Energy Gene 573.75 -11.93 878 ISLE1 0.017 14.5 0.058 51

78 56 Wyom 37 Sweetwater 1002 Jim Bridger -972.4 254.8 1749 ISLE1 0.052 90.1 0.029 5

79 27 Minn 109 Olmsted 2710900011 Rochester Public U 362.62 455.63 508 ISLE1 0.016 8.1 0.061 30

80 39 Ohio 85 Lake 243160009 Cleveland Electric 1279.1 291.75 835 ISLE1 0.020 17 0.045 37

81 48 Texa 161 Freestone 2 Big Brown 89.59 -907.29 1860 ISLE1 0.013 23.6 0.081 151

7
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class 

I Area

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

82 42 Penn 123 Warren 421230004 Reliant Energy Mid 1461.5 347.07 945 ISLE1 0.014 13 0.067 63

83 19 Iowa 193 Woodbury 97-04-011 Midamerican Energy 52.64 255.39 864 ISLE1 0.016 14 0.055 47

84 26 Mich 65 Ingham B2647 Eckert & Moores Pa 1011 370.28 598 ISLE1 0.019 11.1 0.046 27

85 29 Miss 83 Henry 1 Kansas City Power 266.4 -182.27 1118 ISLE1 0.016 18.2 0.052 5886 42 Penn 7 Beaver 420070005 Pa Power Co/Bruce 1385.8 197.02 978 ISLE1 0.015 14.9 0.057 56

87 47 Tenn 161 Stewart 11 Tva Cumberland Fos 832.73 -356.9 1229 ISLE1 0.014 17.5 0.060 7

88 13 Geor 15 Bartow 1500011 Georgia Power Comp 1108 -577.91 1505 ISLE1 0.018 27.5 0.045 67

89 54 West 61 Monongalia 1 Monongahela Power 1447.5 102.18 1088 ISLE1 0.032 35 0.029 31

90 26 Mich 103 Marquette B1833 Marquette Board Of 736.83 764.5 118 ISLE1 0.019 2.2 0.043 5

91 17 Illi 21 Christian 021814AAB Kincaid Generation 640.02 -18.93 880 ISLE1 0.012 10.4 0.074 64

92 39 Ohio 1 Adams 701000007 Dp&L, J.M. Stuart 1146.6 -66.91 1044 ISLE1 0.015 15.9 0.054 56

93 39 Ohio 61 Hamilton 1431350093 Cinergy Corp Miami 1044.5 -28.04 965 ISLE1 0.017 16.1 0.043 41

94 12 Flor 17 Citrus 170004 Progress Energy Fl 1400.3 -1117.6 2110 ISLE1 0.014 29.8 0.054 114

95 1 Alab 71 Jackson 8 Tva - Widows Creek 1021.5 -503.21 1409 ISLE1 0.009 13.2 0.106 149

96 21 Kent 111 Jefferson 127 Lou Gas & Elec, Mi 964.53 -156.68 1060 ISLE1 0.009 10 0.092 97

97 17 Illi 79 Jasper 079808AAA Ameren Energy Gene 757.13 -86.21 951 ISLE1 0.018 17.5 0.041 39

98 18 Indi 125 Pike 2 Ipl Petersburg Gen 842.68 -117.98 994 ISLE1 0.012 11.5 0.069 68

99 29 Miss 165 Platte 7 Kansas City Power 172.78 -58.96 1045 ISLE1 0.016 16.3 0.046 47

100 17 Illi 127 Massac 127855AAC Electric Energy In 730.42 -276.69 1139 ISLE1 0.013 15.1 0.052 58

101 32 Neva 3 Clark P001 Mohave -1586 -385.32 2576 ISLE1 0.031 80.3 0.025 64

102 8 Colo 81 Moffat 18 Craig -890.3 103.31 1733 ISLE1 0.030 51.8 0.021 37103 47 Tenn 85 Humphreys 11 Tva Johnsonville F 807.5 -400.68 1269 ISLE1 0.007 9.2 0.121 153

104 38 Nort 57 Mercer 12 Coyote -365.6 812.34 1035 ISLE1 0.037 38 0.015 15105 49 Utah 15 Emery 10237 Hunter (Emery) -1199 1.37 2056 ISLE1 0.027 54.6 0.017 35

106 56 Wyom 9 Converse 1 Dave Johnston -712.4 349.12 1472 ISLE1 0.028 41.8 0.015 22

107 56 Wyom 31 Platte 1 Laramie River -646.5 261.76 1445 ISLE1 0.037 53.2 0.013 18

108 37 Nort 35 Catawba 3703500073 Duke Energy Corpor 1439.2 -361.13 1445 ISLE1 0.026 38.2 0.012 1

109 55 Wisc 123 Vernon 663020930 Dairyland Power Co 499.22 413.37 478 ISLE1 0.005 2.4 0.082 39

110 53 Wash 41 Lewis 10 Centralia -1953 1030.3 2627 ISLE1 0.027 71.5 0.012 30

111 49 Utah 27 Millard 10327 Intermountain -1324 59.6 2148 ISLE1 0.029 62.4 0.009 20112 4 Ariz 5 Coconino 4 Navajo -1269 -242 2230 ISLE1 0.039 86.8 0.006 13

113 47 Tenn 165 Sumner 25 Tva Gallatin Fossi 944.61 -353.49 1245 ISLE1 0.028 34.8 0.005 6

8
Table 4. 2018 Q/d for non-EGUs for Isle Royale in and out of state. 

Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

1 26 Mich 7 Alpena B1477 LAFARGE NORTH AMER 1064.79 642.46 453 ISLE1 0.06 27.2 0.137 

2 26 Mich 103 Marquette B4885 TILDEN MINING COMP 717.88 752.31 119 ISLE1 0.164 19.5 0.059 

3 18 Indi 127 Porter 1 BETHLEHEM STEEL CO 816.81 225.57 652 ISLE1 0.038 24.7 0.073 

4 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405032870 Fort James Operati 711.36 532.24 331 ISLE1 0.034 11.3 0.104 

5 18 Indi 79 Jennings 2 MUSCATATUCK STATE 983.64 -43.09 957 ISLE1 0.035 33.7 0.055 

6 26 Mich 131 Ontonagon A5754 STONE CONTAINER CO 585.66 788.16 110 ISLE1 0.025 2.8 0.051 

7 55 Wisc 69 Lincoln 735008010 PACKAGING CORPORAT 556.13 626.3 260 ISLE1 0.019 4.8 0.072 

8 26 Mich 41 Delta A0884 ESCANABA PAPER COM 768.76 686.2 202 ISLE1 0.053 10.7 0.038 

9 55 Wisc 87 Outagamie 445031180 INTERNATIONAL PAPE 694.55 508.2 354 ISLE1 0.016 5.7 0.061 

10 29 Miss 163 Pike 1 HOLCIM (US) INC-CL 517.79 -51.92 925 ISLE1 0.023 21.7 0.041 

11 26 Mich 29 Charlevoix B1559 CEMEX, INC. 913.95 648.93 324 ISLE1 0.035 11.4 0.036 

12 35 New 43 Sandoval 350430005 RIO RANCHO FACILIT -873.64 -482.1 2045 ISLE1 0.016 33.4 0.051 

13 18 Indi 89 Lake 121 U S STEEL CO GARY 800.33 221.74 653 ISLE1 0.026 16.7 0.032 

14 36 New 1 Albany 4012400001 LAFARGE BUILDING M 1875.55 517.3 1255 ISLE1 0.015 18.6 0.059 

15 17 Illi 31 Cook 031012ABI CORN PRODUCTS INTE 757.27 234.85 632 ISLE1 0.016 10.2 0.045 

16 19 Iowa 33 Cerro_Gord 17-01-005 LEHIGH CEMENT COMP 306.72 359.46 618 ISLE1 0.016 9.8 0.048 17 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772009480 Stora Enso No. Ame 572.9 514.1 360 ISLE1 0.015 5.4 0.039 18 19 Iowa 33 Cerro_Gord 17-01-009 HOLCIM (US) INC. - 307.38 358.1 619 ISLE1 0.019 11.9 0.026 

19 55 Wisc 85 Oneida 744008100 RHINELANDER PAPER 590.04 650.4 225 ISLE1 0.018 4 0.027 

20 48 Texa 331 Milam 1 ALCOA SANDOW PLANT -6.64 -1048.6 2025 ISLE1 0.011 22.8 0.07 

21 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700113 EVTAC Mining - Fai 332.38 817.67 339 ISLE1 0.015 5.2 0.029 

22 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 3 EASTMAN CHEMICAL C 1282.39 -283.13 1298 ISLE1 0.012 15.3 0.05 23 19 Iowa 45 Clinton 23-01-006 ADM CORN PROCESSIN 559.9 222.35 648 ISLE1 0.02 12.9 0.021 24 27 Minn 37 Dakota 2703700011 Flint Hills Resour 313.1 536.07 481 ISLE1 0.019 9 0.021 

25 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700005 US Steel Corp - Mi 329.2 844.37 339 ISLE1 0.119 40.4 0.016 

26 31 Nebr 25 Cass 2 Ash Grove Cement C 70.4 111.58 959 ISLE1 0.016 15.3 0.021 27 19 Iowa 163 Scott 82-04-005 LAFARGE NORTH AMER 522.89 179.92 696 ISLE1 0.011 7.5 0.03 

28 19 Iowa 113 Linn 57-01-080 ADM CORN PROCESSIN 437.9 226 675 ISLE1 0.014 9.4 0.021 

29 17 Illi 179 Tazewell 179060ACR WILLIAMS ETHANOL S 616.71 86.4 776 ISLE1 0.009 7 0.04 

9
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

30 39 Ohio 141 Ross 671010028 MW CUSTOM PAPERS L 1196.53 14.78 997 ISLE1 0.008 8.1 0.053 

31 55 Wisc 75 Marinette 438039360 Stora Enso No. Ame 699.42 675.24 188 ISLE1 0.01 1.9 0.027 

32 22 Loui 19 Calcasieu 16 CITGO PETROLEUM CO 354.5 -1083.4 1969 ISLE1 0.013 26.2 0.019 

33 21 Kent 19 Boyd 2101900004 MARATHON ASHLAND P 1245.07 -80.57 1104 ISLE1 0.013 14.2 0.021 

34 48 Texa 245 Jefferson 18 BEAUMONT REFINERY 284 -1098.2 1996 ISLE1 0.01 20.4 0.026 

35 38 Nort 57 Mercer 65 GREAT PLAINS SYNFU -366.4 822.14 1035 ISLE1 0.012 12.5 0.021 

36 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772010690 Domtar A. W. Corp- 564.3 500.64 375 ISLE1 0.01 3.6 0.028 

37 47 Tenn 107 McMinn 12 BOWATER NEWSPRINT 1106.02 -447.1 1379 ISLE1 0.012 16.3 0.021 

38 26 Mich 103 Marquette B1827 EMPIRE IRON MINING 721.86 753.57 120 ISLE1 0.087 10.4 0.011 

39 18 Indi 89 Lake 316 ISPAT INLAND INC. 789.68 225.78 647 ISLE1 0.023 15.1 0.013 

40 29 Miss 186 Ste_Genevi 1 MISSISSIPPI LIME C 604.82 -201.25 1064 ISLE1 0.01 10.5 0.022 

41 17 Illi 143 Peoria 143065AJE ARCHER DANIELS MID 620.28 100.05 762 ISLE1 0.011 8.1 0.02 

42 17 Illi 197 Will 197090AAI CITGO PETROLEUM CO 739.52 218.57 646 ISLE1 0.009 5.7 0.022 

43 37 Nort 87 Haywood 3708700159 BLUE RIDGE PAPER P 1273.03 -395.75 1395 ISLE1 0.011 15.1 0.017 44 22 Loui 101 St_Mary 5 COLUMBIAN CHEM CO/ 539.96 -1130.4 1995 ISLE1 0.008 16.8 0.024 45 26 Mich 163 Wayne A7809 NATIONAL STEEL COR 1135.07 339.67 700 ISLE1 0.014 9.6 0.014 

46 17 Illi 197 Will 197800AAA EXXONMOBIL OIL COR 731.72 191.95 672 ISLE1 0.01 6.6 0.017 

47 51 Virg 580 Covington_ 3 MEADWESTVACO PACKA 1479.42 -104.98 1261 ISLE1 0.007 8.3 0.038 

48 36 New 55 Monroe 8261400205 KODAK PARK DIVISIO 1554.15 520.79 949 ISLE1 0.006 5.4 0.065 

49 18 Indi 93 Lawrence 2 LEHIGH CEMENT COMP 908.36 -87.24 978 ISLE1 0.012 11.8 0.012 

50 26 Mich 115 Monroe B1743 HOLCIM (US) INC. 1095.18 301.31 704 ISLE1 0.006 4.1 0.038 

51 17 Illi 119 Madison 119813AAI NATIONAL STEEL COR 593.44 -122.12 986 ISLE1 0.01 10 0.012 

52 36 New 39 Greene 4192600021 ST LAWRENCE CEMENT 1877.11 479.42 1268 ISLE1 0.009 11 0.013 

53 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772010140 Stora Enso No. Ame 569.27 510.68 364 ISLE1 0.015 5.3 0.009 

54 24 Mary 5 Baltimore 005-0147 BETHLEHEM STEEL 1745 111.32 1312 ISLE1 0.01 13 0.011 55 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700063 Keewatin Taconite 341.99 853.46 326 ISLE1 0.059 19.4 0.007 

56 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405032210 PROCTER & GAMBLE P 712.19 536.92 327 ISLE1 0.007 2.2 0.016 

57 39 Ohio 3 Allen 302020012 PREMCOR REFINING G 1077.33 156.38 815 ISLE1 0.008 6.2 0.013 

58 18 Indi 89 Lake 3 BP PRODUCTS NORTH 786.62 226.25 646 ISLE1 0.024 15.6 0.007 

59 48 Texa 201 Harris 39 DEER PARK PLANT 181.22 -1140.9 2060 ISLE1 0.009 18.8 0.011 

10
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

60 54 West 51 Marshall 2 PPG INDUSTRIES, IN 1368.77 92.13 1040 ISLE1 0.005 5.3 0.033 

61 48 Texa 233 Hutchinson 15 BORGER REFINERY -393.25 -467.47 1700 ISLE1 0.005 9.1 0.023 

62 24 Mary 1 Allegany 001-0011 WESTVACO FINE PAPE 1523.36 92.53 1150 ISLE1 0.005 5.4 0.043 

63 48 Texa 139 Ellis 22 HOLCIM (TEXAS) LP 2.71 -830.73 1818 ISLE1 0.011 19.3 0.008 

64 48 Texa 167 Galveston 1 TEXAS CITY REFINER 202.52 -1179 2092 ISLE1 0.009 19.5 0.009 

65 17 Illi 99 La_Salle 099816AAF LONE STAR INDUSTRI 660.86 171.62 689 ISLE1 0.006 3.8 0.016 

66 55 Wisc 31 Douglas 816009590 MURPHY OIL USA 375.35 752.08 313 ISLE1 0.005 1.7 0.016 

67 39 Ohio 17 Butler 1409010006 AK STEEL CORPORATI 1074.3 17.69 936 ISLE1 0.007 6.1 0.01 68 28 Miss 59 Jackson 2805900058 CHEVRON PRODUCTS C 805.08 -1022.4 1888 ISLE1 0.007 12.9 0.01 

69 19 Iowa 139 Muscatine 70-01-004 GRAIN PROCESSING C 493.3 171.15 712 ISLE1 0.004 3.1 0.039 

70 54 West 3 Berkeley 6 CAPITOL CEMENT COR 1615.47 106.66 1211 ISLE1 0.01 11.6 0.007 

71 55 Wisc 73 Marathon 737009570 MOSINEE PAPER CORP 576.5 554.53 320 ISLE1 0.006 1.9 0.011 

72 45 Sout 75 Orangeburg 1860-0005 HOLCIM:HOLLY HILL 1533.29 -599.62 1697 ISLE1 0.006 10.9 0.01 

73 48 Texa 139 Ellis 2 NORTH TEXAS CEMENT -0.39 -829.74 1818 ISLE1 0.006 10.9 0.01 

74 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 22 WILLAMETTE INDUSTR 1280.28 -281.22 1296 ISLE1 0.006 8.3 0.01 

75 51 Virg 23 Botetourt 3 ROANOKE CEMENT COM 1486.06 -140.6 1293 ISLE1 0.007 8.4 0.009 

76 28 Miss 87 Lowndes 2808700025 HOLNAM INC, ARTESI 776.03 -700.15 1565 ISLE1 0.007 10.6 0.008 

77 18 Indi 17 Cass 5 ESSROC CEMENT CORP 886.86 133.3 760 ISLE1 0.006 4.7 0.009 

78 26 Mich 121 Muskegon A4203 S. D. WARREN, MUSK 863.45 407.17 494 ISLE1 0.009 4.3 0.007 

79 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700061 Hibbing Taconite C 312.33 829.93 357 ISLE1 0.051 18.2 0.005 

80 18 Indi 19 Clark 8 ESSROC CEMENT CORP 973.34 -115.29 1023 ISLE1 0.005 5.4 0.012 

81 37 Nort 117 Martin 3711700069 WEYERHAEUSER COMPA 1802.13 -257.21 1592 ISLE1 0.008 13.1 0.007 

82 17 Illi 119 Madison 119090AAA TOSCOPETRO CORP 597.73 -106.12 970 ISLE1 0.009 8.5 0.007 

83 17 Illi 115 Macon 115015AAE ARCHER DANIELS MID 688.52 16.11 845 ISLE1 0.013 11.3 0.006 84 56 Wyom 37 Sweetwater 5603700048 SODIUM PRODUCTS -1057.5 253.95 1829 ISLE1 0.006 11.9 0.008 

85 18 Indi 129 Posey 2 GE PLASTICS MT. VE 792.71 -187.85 1056 ISLE1 0.006 6.5 0.009 

86 1 Alab 103 Morgan 10 SOLUTIA, INC 909.72 -543.84 1425 ISLE1 0.005 6.5 0.016 

87 5 Arka 3 Ashley 500300013 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CO 483.48 -742.27 1614 ISLE1 0.007 10.9 0.007 

88 55 Wisc 87 Outagamie 445030960 Stora Enso No. Ame 688.7 507.13 354 ISLE1 0.005 1.6 0.013 

89 42 Penn 95 Northampto 420950006 HERCULES CEMENT CO 1805.85 300.02 1268 ISLE1 0.006 7.1 0.008 

11
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

90 48 Texa 245 Jefferson 4 PORT ARTHUR REFINE 295.78 -1122.4 2018 ISLE1 0.007 15.1 0.006 

91 51 Virg 101 King_Willi 1 STONE CONTAINER CO 1758.92 -76.26 1438 ISLE1 0.005 7.3 0.009 

92 38 Nort 105 Williams 270 TIOGA GAS PLANT -483.02 945.64 1154 ISLE1 0.008 9.5 0.006 

93 47 Tenn 65 Hamilton 3070 SIGNAL MOUNTAIN CE 1055.41 -474.82 1391 ISLE1 0.008 10.6 0.006 

94 28 Miss 77 Lawrence 2807700007 GEORGIA PACIFIC CO 656.91 -904.14 1765 ISLE1 0.006 10.5 0.007 

95 54 West 51 Marshall 11 VENCO MOUNDSVILLE 1369.32 103.48 1032 ISLE1 0.004 3.8 0.025 

96 42 Penn 95 Northampto 420950012 KEYSTONE PORTLAND 1796.01 293.91 1262 ISLE1 0.005 6.5 0.008 97 48 Texa 139 Ellis 9 MIDLOTHIAN PLANT -2.46 -836.27 1825 ISLE1 0.009 17.2 0.005 

98 13 Geor 115 Floyd 11500021 INLAND PAPERBOARD 1069.64 -568.38 1485 ISLE1 0.005 7.6 0.008 

99 42 Penn 73 Lawrence 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM C 1388.73 225.03 961 ISLE1 0.005 4.3 0.01 

100 45 Sout 41 Florence 1040-0003 STONE CONTAINER FL 1573.22 -495.26 1630 ISLE1 0.006 9.2 0.006 

101 17 Illi 31 Cook ORD O'Hare Airport 748.32 256.51 610 ISLE1 0.051 31.2 0.003 

102 46 Sout 103 Pennington 28.1121-02 GCC DACOTAH -500.27 470.86 1232 ISLE1 0.017 20.8 0.004 

103 22 Loui 19 Calcasieu 69 VENCO/LAKE CHARLES 354.38 -1087.5 1974 ISLE1 0.003 6.5 0.038 

104 22 Loui 89 St_Charles 79 SHELL CHEMICAL LP/ 639.64 -1087.8 1949 ISLE1 0.019 37 0.003 

105 51 Virg 670 Hopewell_C 26 HONEYWELL NYLON IN 1724.53 -110.82 1435 ISLE1 0.024 35 0.003 

106 54 West 73 Pleasants 6 CABOT CORPORATION- 1333.59 40.93 1056 ISLE1 0.003 3.3 0.028 

107 16 Idah 29 Caribou 2900001 P4 PRODUCTION LLC -1184.4 393.32 1911 ISLE1 0.003 6 0.025 

108 26 Mich 43 Dickinson B7192 INTERNATIONAL PAPE 701.73 678.23 186 ISLE1 0.025 4.6 0.003 

109 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700062 Ispat Inland Minin 344.47 852.92 324 ISLE1 0.044 14.2 0.002 

110 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 2 RC CEMENT COMPANY 577.69 -182.41 1047 ISLE1 0.014 14.4 0.002 

111 27 Minn 53 Hennepin 27053XMSP MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAU 298.25 547.7 485 ISLE1 0.018 8.8 0.002 

112 42 Penn 41 Cumberland 420410013 PPG IND INC/WORKS 1665.79 196.8 1198 ISLE1 0.014 17.1 0.001 

113 48 Texa 485 Wichita 15 WORKS NO 4 -143.17 -664.17 1728 ISLE1 0.014 24 1E-03 

114 22 Loui 39 Evangeline 1 CABOT CORPORATION/ 456.09 -1015.5 1888 ISLE1 0.002 3.1 0.026 

115 48 Texa 227 Howard 2 BIG SPRING CARBON -416.53 -847.53 2024 ISLE1 0.002 3.1 0.024 

116 22 Loui 47 Iberville 8 DOW CHEMICAL CO/LA 557.14 -1058.1 1922 ISLE1 0.014 27.4 7E-04 

117 17 Illi 197 Will 197803AAK CHICAGO CARBON CO 740.81 220.67 644 ISLE1 1E-03 0.6 0.025 

118 22 Loui 33 East_Baton 21 GREAT LAKES CARBON 554.41 -1028.3 1893 ISLE1 9E-04 1.7 0.043 

119 1 Alab 53 Escambia 7 EXXONMOBIL PRODUCT 920.59 -943.87 1822 ISLE1 5E-04 0.9 0.026 

12
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

County 

ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

120 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 7 SEAMAN CORPORATION 1314.19 -273.47 1305 ISLE1 0.015 20 1E-04 121 21 Kent 91 Hancock 2109100004 CENTURY ALUMINUM O 890.34 -177.37 1062 ISLE1 4E-04 0.4 0.03 

122 28 Miss 67 Jones 2806700010 TRANSCONTINENTAL G 753 -875.43 1738 ISLE1 0.015 26.7 7E-05 

123 29 Miss 93 Iron 8 DOE RUN COMPANY-GL 554.08 -259.61 1126 ISLE1 2E-04 0.3 0.175 

124 48 Texa 39 Brazoria 41 PLANT B 157.03 -1224 2147 ISLE1 0.015 32.3 1E-05 

125 51 Virg 11 Appomattox 11 TRANSCO STATION 17 1587.14 -134.93 1355 ISLE1 0.014 18.9 0 

126 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 3 DOE RUN COMPANY-HE 575.2 -171.7 1037 ISLE1 8E-05 0.1 0.069 

127 17 Illi 31 Cook 031600AMC LTV STEEL CO 780.85 227.97 643 ISLE1 0.036 23.3 0 128 28 Miss 121 Rankin 2812100036 PURSUE ENERGY CORP 662.47 -843.93 1705 ISLE1 1E-05 0 0.026 

129 4 Ariz 7 Gila 40072435 ASARCO - RAY COMPL -1271 -590.46 2422 ISLE1 . . 0.038 

130 18 Indi 89 Lake 383 COKENERGY INC. 791.75 227.82 645 ISLE1 . . 0.033 

13
Appendix 10E 

Calpuff Modeling, Q/D And Visibility 

For Seney 
2

For Seney, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri and Wisconsin have the 

majority of the 20% worst day; same as indicated by the PSAT analysis (see 

Figure 10.2.c). 

Figure 10.2.c: Composite back trajectories for Seney for the 20% worst days. 

Orange is where the air is most likely to come from and green is where it is least 

like to come from. 

1
3

Table 1. Calpuff modeling for Seney, includes only facilities located in the state of 

Michigan. 

SENEY CLASS I AREA 

FACILITY SRN 1/(M-m) 

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY B4261 0.565 

EMPIRE IRON MINING PARTNERSHIP B1827 0.494 

J. H. Campbell Plant B2835 0.493 

ESCANABA PAPER COMPANY A0884 0.316 

Karn - Weadock Facility B2840 0.311 

ST MARYS CEMENT INC B1559 0.187 

B. C. Cobb Plant B2836 0.182 

Tilden Mining Company L.C. B4885 0.148 

ESCANABA POWER PLANT B1573 0.128 

MANISTIQUE PAPERS INC A6475 0.120 

Neenah Paper - Michigan, Inc. B1470 0.077 

Eckert & Moores Park Station B2647 0.075 

Lafarge North America - Alpena Plant B1477 0.068 

ANR Pipeline Company - Bridgman Compressor Station N5575 0.067 

DETROIT EDISON/MONROE POWER B2816 0.063 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO B7192 0.047 

TES FILER CITY STATION N1685 0.038 

Packaging Corporation of America - Filer City Mill B3692 0.038 

Lansing Board of Water & Light, Erickson Station B4001 0.037 

Marquette Board of Light & Power B1833 0.037 

Holland BPW, Generating Station & WWTP B2357 0.036 

Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, LLC A3900 0.035 

Michigan State University K3249 0.034 

S. D. Warren, Muskegon, MI, Operations A4203 0.030 

ANR Pipeline Company - Hamilton Compressor Station N5574 0.028 

Midland Cogeneration Venture B6527 0.026 

Traverse City Light and Power Bayside Power Plant B4257 0.024 

DETROIT EDISON TRENTON CHANNEL B2811 0.024 

ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER POWER PLANT B2796 0.024 

Morton Salt Specialty Magnesia B1824 0.024 

General Chemical Industrial Products Inc. B1821 0.023 

Harbor Beach Power Plant B2815 0.017 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #8 N3760 0.017 

FARWELL COMPRESSOR STATION NO 12 N5581 0.016 

MENOMINEE PAPER COMPANY B1855 0.016 

STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION A5754 0.016 

DETROIT EDISON RIVER ROUGE B2810 0.013 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - Manistee Sulfur Plant B6013 0.013 

Michigan Sugar Company - Carrollton Factory B2874 0.011 

ANR Pipeline Co - Woolfolk Compressor Station B7220 0.010 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #9 N3759 0.010 

J.R. WHITING CO B2846 0.009 

ANR-Coldsprings/ Blue Lake Gas Storage Company B7198 0.009 

Michigan Sugar Company - Sebewaing Factory B2873 0.008 

ANR Pipeline Company Lincoln Compressor Station N5586 0.008 

2
4

FACILITY SRN 1/(M-m) 

 

Michigan Sugar Company, Caro Factory B2875 0.008 

Delphi Saginaw Steering Systems, Holland Road A6175 0.008 

HOLCIM (US) INC. B1743 0.007 

U S STEEL GREAT LAKES WORKS A7809 0.007 

Pharmacia & Upjohn Co LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer B3610 0.007 

J. B. Sims Generating Station B1976 0.007 

Reed City Compressor Station B3721 0.006 

Muskegon River Compressor Station N2901 0.006 

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation N1315 0.005 

Merit Energy Company. - Mayfield 23 B5587 0.005 

DETROIT EDISON GREENWOOD ENERGY CENTER B6145 0.005 

TAGGART COMPRESSOR STATION N3392 0.004 

Viking Energy of McBain N1160 0.004 

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY- WHITE PIGEON CO N5573 0.004 

GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC. B1678 0.004 

Merit Energy Co. - Brown 7 B5589 0.003 

East Jordan Iron Works A0767 0.003 

Steelcase Inc. - Grand Rapids Complex N0980 0.003 

Decorative Panels International, Inc B1476 0.003 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - KALKASKA GAS PLANT B4292 0.003 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #7 N2168 0.003 

Cadillac Renewable Energy Facility N1395 0.003 

Michigan Power Limited Partnership N4975 0.003 

MI SO CENTRAL POWER AGENCY B6611 0.003 

KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY N2955 0.003 

White Pigeon Paper Company B2024 0.002 

Hanson Brick - Michigan Plant A6497 0.002 

Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC B4288 0.002 

DEARBORN INDUSTRIAL GENERATION N6631 0.002 

Aztec Producing Company, Inc. B7093 0.002 

KINDER MORGAN CO N6626 0.002 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION - ORION ASSEMBLY B7227 0.002 

GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES B1877 0.002 

CMS ANTRIM GAS L.L.C. N2940 0.002 

GM POWERTRAIN GROUP - SAGINAW METAL CASTING B1991 0.002 

Overisel Compressor Station N5792 0.002 

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Station #11 B8573 0.002 

GREAT LAKES GAS TRANSMISSION STATION #10 N3758 0.002 

GMC-MFD Grand Blanc Metal Fab Plant B1610 0.002 

HILLMAN POWER CO N1266 0.002 

GRAYLING GENERATING STATION LTD PTNR N2388 0.001 

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Station #13 N3818 0.001 

MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM A9831 0.001 

QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC. - P-LEASE N3190 0.001 

GREAT LAKES TISSUE B1563 0.001 

General Motors Pontiac Site Operations B4032 0.001 

MERIT ENERGY CO. - OTSEGO LAKE 34 N0200 0.001 

SUMMIT ESSEXVILLE INC N0827 0.001 

3
5

FACILITY SRN 1/(M-m) 

 

VIKING ENERGY OF LINCOLN, INC. N0890 0.001 

WYANDOTTE DEPT MUNI POWER B2132 0.001 

Kellogg USA Inc. A0563 0.001 

Michigan Sugar Company - Bay City B1493 0.001 

JAGUAR ENERGY, FREDERIC 15 GAS PLANT B7222 0.001 

The Dow Chemical Company U.S.A., Midland A4033 0.001 

Howell Compressor Station N5572 0.001 

Michigan Sugar Company, Croswell Factory B2876 0.001 

General Motors Corporation - Van Slyke Complex B1606 0.001 

Ludlow Coated Products B2013 0.001 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES-ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION A6380 0.001 

BELLE RIVER COMPRESSOR STATION B6478 0.001 

Kent County Waste to Energy Facility N1604 0.001 

MID MICHIGAN GAS STORAGE CO - CAPAC B6481 0.001 

Western Michigan University K2131 0.001 

ADA COGENERATION N1784 0.001 

GENESEE POWER STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP N3570 0.001 

QUANEX CORP MACSTEEL DIVISION B4306 0.001 

E.B. EDDY PAPER INC. B6420 0.001 

SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC. A8640 0.000 

Central Michigan University K2460 0.000 

Menasha Packaging Company, LLC, Otsego Mill A0023 0.000 

UNIVERSITY OF MI M0675 0.000 

CARGILL SALT A6240 0.000 

MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT--HEADQUARTERS OIL FIELD N0924 0.000 

DETROIT THERMAL BEACON HEATING PLANT B2814 0.000 

Hyperion Energy, Rich Field Gas Plant B5462 0.000 

ST. CLAIR COMPRESSOR STATION B6637 0.000 

GREATER DETROIT RESOURCE RECOVERY M4148 0.000 

DaimlerChrysler Technology Center N1436 0.000 

DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION A8638 0.000 

FORD MOTOR CO/ WAYNE COMPLEX A8650 0.000 

DETROIT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT B2103 0.000 

EQ-SITE #2 M4782 0.000 

ONYX-ARBOR HILLS LANDFILL N2688 0.000 

FREEDOM COMPRESSOR STATION N3920 0.000 

CARMEUSE LIME/ RIVER ROUGE B2169 0.000 

CARMEUSE/DETROIT LIME B3520 0.000 

GENERAL MOTORS HAMTRAMCK M4199 0.000 

DETROIT PUBLIC LIGHTING B2185 0.000 

CENTRAL WAYNE ENERGY RECOVERY B4281 0.000 

IPMC AQUISITION LLC A7051 0.000 

GM Technical Center B4049 0.000 

FORD MOTOR CO ELM ST BOILERHOUSE M4764 0.000 

4
6

Table 2. Top 30 facilities contributing to decreased visibility at Seney, includes 

facilities in and out of state. 

 Area Deciviews State County Facility ID Facility Name 

5
Table 3 2018 Q/d EGUs for Seney for facilities in and out of state. 

Obs Stat

e ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

(km) 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

1 26 Mich 147 St_Clair B2796 St. Clair / Belle 1175.59 406.81 473 SENE1 0.127 60.2 0.528 249.6 2 26 Mich 103 Marquette B4261 Wisconsin Electric 736.05 769.94 115 SENE1 0.139 16 0.336 38.8 3 18 Indi 147 Spencer 20 Indiana Michigan P 868.79 -182.36 932 SENE1 0.063 59.1 0.208 193.9 4 55 Wisc 117 Sheboygan 460033090 Wp & L Alliant Ene 726.01 448.45 325 SENE1 0.060 19.5 0.203 66 5 17 Illi 197 Will 197809AAO Midwest Generation 754.82 201.22 556 SENE1 0.051 28.3 0.202 112.2 6 26 Mich 115 Monroe B2816 Detroit Edison/Mon 1122.4 293.92 531 SENE1 0.040 21.1 0.346 183.6 7 26 Mich 139 Ottawa B2835 J. H. Campbell Pla 875.41 374.7 375 SENE1 0.040 14.9 0.428 160.7 8 27 Minn 141 Sherburne 2714100004 Nsp - Sherburne Ge 242.98 601.12 624 SENE1 0.087 54.3 0.117 73 9 13 Geor 207 Monroe 20700008 Georgia Power Comp 1227.24 -681.37 1480 SENE1 0.039 58.4 0.218 322.4 

10 55 Wisc 11 Buffalo 606034110 Dairyland Power Co 412.92 490.06 508 SENE1 0.043 21.9 0.152 77.3 11 55 Wisc 21 Columbia 111003090 Alliant Energy-Col 604.68 417.45 412 SENE1 0.039 16 0.215 88.7 12 29 Miss 71 Franklin 3 Amerenue-Labadie P 533.09 -140.88 945 SENE1 0.037 34.7 0.232 218.7 13 55 Wisc 73 Marathon 737009020 Wis Public Service 581.37 565 325 SENE1 0.040 13 0.126 41 14 26 Mich 17 Bay B2840 Karn - Weadock Fac 1053.98 480.5 338 SENE1 0.038 12.7 0.206 69.7 15 21 Kent 145 McCracken 2114500006 Tva-Environmental 725.03 -282.55 1039 SENE1 0.057 59.1 0.100 104.4 16 18 Indi 73 Jasper 8 Nipsco - R.M. Scha 829.67 180.7 569 SENE1 0.038 21.8 0.168 95.4 17 27 Minn 61 Itasca 2706100004 Minnesota Power In 250.45 815.4 603 SENE1 0.039 23.5 0.122 73.8 18 26 Mich 163 Wayne B2810 Detroit Edison Riv 1134.99 338.82 500 SENE1 0.039 19.5 0.118 59.2 19 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405031990 Wi Public Service 711.56 538.78 252 SENE1 0.040 10.1 0.089 22.4 20 17 Illi 197 Will 197810AAK Midwest Generation 739.33 216.94 543 SENE1 0.030 16.4 0.131 71.4 21 20 Kans 107 Linn 5 Kansas City Power 204.64 -180.37 1131 SENE1 0.102 114.9 0.067 75.7 22 26 Mich 163 Wayne B2811 Detroit Edison Tre 1131.97 321.47 513 SENE1 0.030 15.1 0.156 80.1 23 31 Nebr 111 Lincoln 19 Nppd Gerald Gentle -346.04 127.9 1347 SENE1 0.050 67.2 0.073 98.2 24 40 Okla 101 Muskogee 1209 Og&E 153.25 -468.02 1402 SENE1 0.045 63.4 0.069 96.8 25 55 Wisc 79 Milwaukee 241007800 Wis Electric Power 735.39 372.57 393 SENE1 0.030 11.8 0.101 39.9 26 29 Miss 183 St_Charles 1 Amerenue-Sioux Pla 577.43 -98.68 890 SENE1 0.026 23.5 0.122 108.5 27 5 Arka 63 Independen 506300042 Entergy Ark-Indepe 492.48 -457.61 1258 SENE1 0.040 50.8 0.065 81.9 28 10 Dela 5 Sussex 1000500001 Indian River Gener 1865.68 68.12 1223 SENE1 0.030 36.5 0.088 107.1 29 39 Ohio 113 Montgomery 857780013 Dp&L, O.H. Hutchin 1080.83 32.2 753 SENE1 0.027 20.1 0.099 74.6 30 54 West 79 Putnam 6 Appalachian Power 1309.75 -59.75 931 SENE1 0.029 26.9 0.087 81.2 31 40 Okla 131 Rogers 212 Public Svc Co Of O 116 -394.96 1359 SENE1 0.037 50.3 0.066 89.7 32 21 Kent 41 Carroll 2104100010 Kentucky Utilities 1030.26 -70.65 839 SENE1 0.024 20.2 0.108 90.6 33 18 Indi 89 Lake 117 Nipsco - Dean H. M 792.89 223.83 528 SENE1 0.025 13.4 0.097 51.2 34 21 Kent 177 Muhlenberg 2117700006 Tva Paradise Steam 881.29 -254.8 1004 SENE1 0.022 22.4 0.134 135 35 18 Indi 29 Dearborn 2 American Electric 1040.07 -31.95 804 SENE1 0.030 24.1 0.072 57.8 36 54 West 33 Harrison 15 Monongahela Power 1420.24 62.14 893 SENE1 0.032 28.7 0.062 55.1 37 26 Mich 121 Muskegon B2836 B. C. Cobb Plant 867.65 412.1 338 SENE1 0.021 7.2 0.124 41.9 38 48 Texa 449 Titus 3 Monticello Stm Ele 183.02 -764.16 1654 SENE1 0.024 39.7 0.090 148.9 39 48 Texa 401 Rusk 11 Martin Lake Electr 228.94 -855.56 1720 SENE1 0.032 54.6 0.060 103.6 40 18 Indi 43 Floyd 4 Psi Energy - Galla 968.21 -132.21 889 SENE1 0.025 22.5 0.079 69.9 41 17 Illi 97 Lake 097190AAC Midwest Generation 737.64 294.2 468 SENE1 0.023 10.8 0.095 44.3 

6
Obs Stat

e ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

42 26 Mich 65 Ingham B2647 Eckert & Moores Pa 1010.99 370.28 412 SENE1 0.027 11.1 0.067 27.6 43 22 Loui 77 Pointe_Cou 5 La Generating Llc/ 541.11 -1012.94 1789 SENE1 0.023 41.6 0.087 156.2 44 38 Nort 57 Mercer 11 Antelope Valley -366.36 829.12 1218 SENE1 0.029 34.8 0.064 77.9 45 19 Iowa 179 Wapello 90-07-001 Ipl - Ottumwa Gene 370.37 130.73 782 SENE1 0.024 19.1 0.073 57.3 46 39 Ohio 81 Jefferson 641160017 W. H. Sammis Plant 1370.12 182.63 769 SENE1 0.047 36.4 0.046 35.3 47 20 Kans 149 Pottawatom 1 Westar Energy, Inc 76.41 -78.82 1133 SENE1 0.066 74.3 0.042 47.4 48 26 Mich 115 Monroe B2846 J.R. Whiting Co 1115.57 281.92 538 SENE1 0.022 12 0.081 43.6 49 35 New 45 San_Juan 2 Four Corners -1017.45 -302.17 2143 SENE1 0.060 127.9 0.040 86.5 50 38 Nort 65 Oliver 1 Milton R Young -320.89 792.72 1171 SENE1 0.058 68.5 0.041 48.5 51 39 Ohio 85 Lake 243160009 Cleveland Electric 1279.13 291.75 628 SENE1 0.027 17 0.060 37.4 

52 5 Arka 69 Jefferson 506900110 Entergy Ark-White 444.95 -604.3 1413 SENE1 0.020 27.8 0.095 134.8 53 17 Illi 179 Tazewell 179801AAA Midwest Generation 623.59 83.59 703 SENE1 0.017 11.8 0.121 85.2 54 31 Nebr 55 Douglas 2 Omaha Public Power 87.56 147.4 971 SENE1 0.028 27.6 0.054 52.4 55 29 Miss 189 St_Louis 10 Amerenue-Meramec P 577.8 -155.79 945 SENE1 0.022 20.4 0.077 72.3 56 40 Okla 97 Mayes 799 Grand River Dam Au 152.96 -420.36 1361 SENE1 0.033 45.3 0.046 63.1 57 19 Iowa 115 Louisa 58-07-001 Midamerican Energy 491.15 161.82 688 SENE1 0.023 16 0.067 46 58 39 Ohio 31 Coshocton 616000000 Conesville Power P 1273.11 126.55 753 SENE1 0.021 15.9 0.076 57.5 59 29 Miss 175 Randolph 1 Associated Electri 372.28 -40.81 923 SENE1 0.024 22.2 0.059 54.2 60 46 Sout 51 Grant 1001 Big Stone 38.52 588.77 827 SENE1 0.051 41.9 0.037 31 61 1 Alab 127 Walker 1 Alabama Power Comp 905.95 -655.15 1405 SENE1 0.023 32.7 0.061 86 62 17 Illi 31 Cook 031600AIN Midwest Generation 740.23 258.24 503 SENE1 0.020 10.1 0.078 39 63 19 Iowa 193 Woodbury 97-04-010 Midamerican Energy 50.9 257.79 938 SENE1 0.020 19.2 0.071 66.5 64 42 Penn 123 Warren 421230004 Reliant Energy Mid 1461.47 347.07 732 SENE1 0.018 13 0.087 63.5 65 18 Indi 167 Vigo 21 Psi Energy - Wabas 816.7 -9.44 759 SENE1 0.024 18 0.058 43.7 66 42 Penn 7 Beaver 420070005 Pa Power Co/Bruce 1385.78 197.02 770 SENE1 0.019 14.9 0.073 56.2 67 18 Indi 51 Gibson 13 Psi Energy - Gibso 800.1 -139.75 890 SENE1 0.024 21.1 0.056 49.7 68 31 Nebr 131 Otoe 36 Oppd Nebraska City 102.73 69.51 1010 SENE1 0.030 30.1 0.045 45 69 1 Alab 73 Jefferson 10730011 Alabama Power Comp 918.55 -655.58 1406 SENE1 0.015 20.8 0.108 151.2 70 18 Indi 77 Jefferson 1 Ikec - Clifty Cree 996.96 -75.84 838 SENE1 0.014 12 0.118 99.2 71 19 Iowa 155 Pottawatta 78-01-026 Midamerican Energy 96.67 131.21 974 SENE1 0.022 21.8 0.056 54.9 72 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 16 Amerenue-Rush Isla 585.2 -185.06 971 SENE1 0.015 14.6 0.093 90.2 73 30 Mont 87 Rosebud 14 Colstrip -745.47 692.28 1596 SENE1 0.062 99.4 0.031 50.2 74 54 West 61 Monongalia 1 Monongahela Power 1447.46 102.18 881 SENE1 0.040 35 0.036 31.3 75 39 Ohio 1 Adams 701000007 Dp&L, J.M. Stuart 1146.62 -66.91 868 SENE1 0.018 15.9 0.065 56.1 76 17 Illi 137 Morgan 137805AAA Ameren Energy Gene 573.75 -11.93 809 SENE1 0.018 14.5 0.063 51.2 77 47 Tenn 161 Stewart 11 Tva Cumberland Fos 832.73 -356.9 1106 SENE1 0.016 17.5 0.067 74 78 55 Wisc 79 Milwaukee 241007690 Wis Electric Power 744.78 352.32 410 SENE1 0.020 8.2 0.053 21.8 79 39 Ohio 61 Hamilton 1431350093 Cinergy Corp Miami 1044.54 -28.04 801 SENE1 0.020 16.1 0.052 41.9 80 40 Okla 103 Noble 1211 Og&E -4.49 -392.21 1425 SENE1 0.026 37.4 0.039 55.6 81 13 Geor 15 Bartow 1500011 Georgia Power Comp 1107.98 -577.91 1352 SENE1 0.020 27.5 0.050 67.5 82 19 Iowa 5 Allamakee 03-03-001 Ipl - Lansing Gene 470.71 385.08 525 SENE1 0.019 9.8 0.053 27.6 83 35 New 45 San_Juan 902 San Juan -1003.78 -291.61 2125 SENE1 0.036 77.5 0.031 66.3 

7
Obs Stat

e ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d 

for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

Q/d 

for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emissions 

(tons/day)

84 56 Wyom 37 Sweetwater 1002 Jim Bridger -972.43 254.8 1888 SENE1 0.048 90.1 0.027 50 85 17 Illi 79 Jasper 079808AAA Ameren Energy Gene 757.13 -86.21 840 SENE1 0.021 17.5 0.047 39.1 86 18 Indi 125 Pike 2 Ipl Petersburg Gen 842.68 -117.98 867 SENE1 0.013 11.5 0.079 68.3 87 17 Illi 21 Christian 021814AAB Kincaid Generation 640.02 -18.93 796 SENE1 0.013 10.4 0.081 64.8 88 48 Texa 161 Freestone 2 Big Brown 89.59 -907.29 1822 SENE1 0.013 23.6 0.083 151.3 89 29 Miss 83 Henry 1 Kansas City Power 266.4 -182.27 1099 SENE1 0.017 18.2 0.053 58.2 90 12 Flor 17 Citrus 170004 Progress Energy Fl 1400.33 -1117.57 1946 SENE1 0.015 29.8 0.059 114.4 91 38 Nort 57 Mercer 1 Leland Olds -333.88 817.63 1185 SENE1 0.038 45.6 0.028 33.2 92 27 Minn 31 Cook 2703100001 Minnesota Power - 456.12 868.74 411 SENE1 0.019 7.7 0.047 19.3 93 21 Kent 111 Jefferson 127 Lou Gas & Elec, Mi 964.53 -156.68 913 SENE1 0.011 10 0.107 97.3 94 54 West 51 Marshall 5 Ohio Power - Mitch 1369.32 103.48 829 SENE1 0.015 12.3 0.059 48.6 95 26 Mich 103 Marquette B1833 Marquette Board Of 736.83 764.5 114 SENE1 0.020 2.2 0.045 5.1 96 38 Nort 55 McLean 17 Coal Creek -314.98 827.45 1167 SENE1 0.013 15.6 0.065 76.1 97 39 Ohio 13 Belmont 607130015 R. E. Burger Plant 1371.93 112.83 823 SENE1 0.024 19.6 0.037 30.1 98 17 Illi 127 Massac 127855AAC Electric Energy In 730.42 -276.69 1033 SENE1 0.015 15.1 0.057 58.7 99 1 Alab 71 Jackson 8 Tva - Widows Creek 1021.51 -503.21 1264 SENE1 0.010 13.2 0.118 149.4 

100 39 Ohio 53 Gallia 627010056 Gavin Power Plant 1276.05 -13.25 874 SENE1 0.020 17.8 0.043 37.5 101 26 Mich 41 Delta ORIS900426 Generic Unit 778.82 701.52 85 SENE1 0.030 2.6 0.025 2.2 102 18 Indi 91 La_Porte 21 Michigan City 833.07 236.91 512 SENE1 0.009 4.8 0.091 46.5 103 47 Tenn 85 Humphreys 11 Tva Johnsonville F 807.5 -400.68 1151 SENE1 0.008 9.2 0.133 153.1 104 32 Neva 3 Clark P001 Mohave -1586.4 -385.32 2687 SENE1 0.030 80.3 0.024 64.2 105 37 Nort 35 Catawba 3703500073 Duke Energy Corpor 1439.23 -361.13 1257 SENE1 0.030 38.2 0.014 17 106 38 Nort 57 Mercer 12 Coyote -365.63 812.34 1217 SENE1 0.031 38 0.013 15.6 107 56 Wyom 31 Platte 1 Laramie River -646.48 261.76 1573 SENE1 0.034 53.2 0.012 18.4 108 55 Wisc 123 Vernon 663020930 Dairyland Power Co 499.22 413.37 485 SENE1 0.005 2.4 0.081 39.2 109 4 Ariz 5 Coconino 4 Navajo -1269.44 -242 2339 SENE1 0.037 86.8 0.006 13.2 110 47 Tenn 165 Sumner 25 Tva Gallatin Fossi 944.61 -353.49 1107 SENE1 0.031 34.8 0.006 6.5 111 42 Penn 63 Indiana 420630002 Seward 1505.09 194.39 859 SENE1 0.031 26.8 0.000 0 

8
Table 4. 2018 Q/d for non-EGUs for Seney in and out of state. 

Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

(km) 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/

day) 

Nox 

Emis

Ran

1 26 Mich 7 Alpena B1477 Lafarge North Amer 1064.8 642.46 240 SENE1 0.11307 27.2 0.2575 61.9 2 26 Mich 29 Charlevoix B1559 Cemex, Inc. 913.95 648.93 119 SENE1 0.09562 11.4 0.0974 11.6 73 26 Mich 41 Delta A0884 Escanaba Paper Com 768.76 686.2 102 SENE1 0.10491 10.7 0.0757 7.7 84 18 Indi 127 Porter 1 Bethlehem Steel Co 816.81 225.57 525 SENE1 0.04705 24.7 0.0914 47.9 15 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405032870 Fort James Operati 711.36 532.24 257 SENE1 0.04395 11.3 0.134 34.5 76 26 Mich 103 Marquette B4885 Tilden Mining Comp 717.88 752.31 132 SENE1 0.14853 19.5 0.0531 7 27 18 Indi 79 Jennings 2 Muscatatuck State 983.64 -43.09 804 SENE1 0.04191 33.7 0.0659 53 8 55 Wisc 87 Outagamie 445031180 International Pape 694.55 508.2 286 SENE1 0.02004 5.7 0.0748 21.4 259 36 New 1 Albany 4012400001 Lafarge Building M 1875.6 517.3 1052 SENE1 0.0177 18.6 0.07 73.6 2

10 17 Illi 31 Cook 031012ABI Corn Products Inte 757.27 234.85 522 SENE1 0.01952 10.2 0.0539 28.2 911 18 Indi 89 Lake 121 U S Steel Co Gary 800.33 221.74 530 SENE1 0.03144 16.7 0.0393 20.8 312 29 Miss 163 Pike 1 Holcim (Us) Inc-Cl 517.79 -51.92 867 SENE1 0.02502 21.7 0.0439 38.1 113 26 Mich 153 Schoolcraf A6475 Manistique Papers 831.18 711.84 42 SENE1 0.01603 0.7 0.0609 2.5 20014 35 New 43 Sandoval 350430005 Rio Rancho Facilit -873.64 -482.1 2118 SENE1 0.01579 33.4 0.049 103.7 15 55 Wisc 69 Lincoln 735008010 Packaging Corporat 556.13 626.3 318 SENE1 0.01522 4.8 0.059 18.8 3316 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 3 Eastman Chemical C 1282.4 -283.13 1119 SENE1 0.01368 15.3 0.0576 64.5 417 19 Iowa 33 Cerro_Gord 17-01-005 Lehigh Cement Comp 306.72 359.46 668 SENE1 0.01472 9.8 0.0441 29.4 918 19 Iowa 33 Cerro_Gord 17-01-009 Holcim (Us) Inc. - 307.38 358.1 668 SENE1 0.01784 11.9 0.0243 16.3 619 48 Texa 331 Milam 1 Alcoa Sandow Plant -6.64 -1048.6 1991 SENE1 0.01147 22.8 0.0707 140.8 120 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772009480 Stora Enso No. Ame 572.9 514.1 363 SENE1 0.01478 5.4 0.0388 14.1 2821 19 Iowa 45 Clinton 23-01-006 Adm Corn Processin 559.9 222.35 601 SENE1 0.02147 12.9 0.0224 13.5 522 21 Kent 19 Boyd 2101900004 Marathon Ashland P 1245.1 -80.57 919 SENE1 0.0154 14.2 0.0249 22.9 423 39 Ohio 141 Ross 671010028 Mw Custom Papers L 1196.5 14.78 812 SENE1 0.01001 8.1 0.0646 52.5 1324 26 Mich 163 Wayne A7809 National Steel Cor 1135.1 339.67 499 SENE1 0.01923 9.6 0.0194 9.7 1025 26 Mich 3 Alger B1470 Kimberly-Clark Mic 795.45 757.13 55 SENE1 0.01171 0.6 0.0332 1.8 20026 18 Indi 89 Lake 316 Ispat Inland Inc. 789.68 225.78 527 SENE1 0.02872 15.1 0.0162 8.5 427 19 Iowa 163 Scott 82-04-005 Lafarge North Amer 522.89 179.92 656 SENE1 0.01142 7.5 0.0321 21.1 1528 17 Illi 179 Tazewell 179060ACR Williams Ethanol S 616.71 86.4 702 SENE1 0.01003 7 0.0443 31.1 1729 47 Tenn 107 McMinn 12 Bowater Newsprint 1106 -447.1 1223 SENE1 0.01335 16.3 0.0237 29 3

9
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/

day) 

Nox 

Emis

Ran

30 55 Wisc 75 Marinette 438039360 Stora Enso No. Ame 699.42 675.24 167 SENE1 0.01123 1.9 0.03 5 8131 31 Nebr 25 Cass 2 Ash Grove Cement C 70.4 111.58 1007 SENE1 0.01522 15.3 0.0198 19.9 432 55 Wisc 85 Oneida 744008100 Rhinelander Paper 590.04 650.4 278 SENE1 0.01431 4 0.0215 6 4133 19 Iowa 113 Linn 57-01-080 Adm Corn Processin 437.9 226 666 SENE1 0.01406 9.4 0.0217 14.4 1134 48 Texa 245 Jefferson 18 Beaumont Refinery 284 -1098.2 1932 SENE1 0.01055 20.4 0.0269 51.9 135 22 Loui 19 Calcasieu 16 Citgo Petroleum Co 354.5 -1083.4 1898 SENE1 0.01382 26.2 0.0202 38.4 136 17 Illi 197 Will 197090AAI Citgo Petroleum Co 739.52 218.57 542 SENE1 0.01054 5.7 0.0263 14.3 2537 27 Minn 37 Dakota 2703700011 Flint Hills Resour 313.1 536.07 577 SENE1 0.01554 9 0.0174 10 1238 17 Illi 143 Peoria 143065AJE Archer Daniels Mid 620.28 100.05 688 SENE1 0.01177 8.1 0.022 15.1 1339 36 New 55 Monroe 8261400205 Kodak Park Divisio 1554.2 520.79 741 SENE1 0.00731 5.4 0.0832 61.7 2740 29 Miss 186 Ste_Genevi 1 Mississippi Lime C 604.82 -201.25 981 SENE1 0.01074 10.5 0.0233 22.9 841 26 Mich 115 Monroe B1743 Holcim (Us) Inc. 1095.2 301.31 511 SENE1 0.00797 4.1 0.0521 26.6 4042 37 Nort 87 Haywood 3708700159 Blue Ridge Paper P 1273 -395.75 1221 SENE1 0.0124 15.1 0.0196 24 443 17 Illi 197 Will 197800AAA Exxonmobil Oil Cor 731.72 191.95 569 SENE1 0.01151 6.6 0.0204 11.6 2044 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772010690 Domtar A. W. Corp- 564.3 500.64 378 SENE1 0.00948 3.6 0.0275 10.4 4545 51 Virg 580 Covington_ 3 Meadwestvaco Packa 1479.4 -104.98 1061 SENE1 0.00783 8.3 0.0454 48.2 1346 26 Mich 103 Marquette B1827 Empire Iron Mining 721.86 753.57 128 SENE1 0.08138 10.4 0.0107 1.4 847 26 Mich 131 Ontonagon A5754 Stone Container Co 585.66 788.16 267 SENE1 0.01042 2.8 0.0209 5.6 5948 22 Loui 101 St_Mary 5 Columbian Chem Co/ 539.96 -1130.4 1905 SENE1 0.00881 16.8 0.0247 47 349 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700005 Us Steel Corp - Mi 329.2 844.37 529 SENE1 0.07638 40.4 0.0101 5.3 50 18 Indi 93 Lawrence 2 Lehigh Cement Comp 908.36 -87.24 838 SENE1 0.01411 11.8 0.0143 12 651 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700113 Evtac Mining - Fai 332.38 817.67 522 SENE1 0.01005 5.2 0.0187 9.8 2952 38 Nort 57 Mercer 65 Great Plains Synfu -366.4 822.14 1218 SENE1 0.01024 12.5 0.0178 21.7 553 55 Wisc 9 Brown 405032210 Procter & Gamble P 712.19 536.92 253 SENE1 0.00874 2.2 0.0209 5.3 7254 24 Mary 5 Baltimore 005-0147 Bethlehem Steel 1745 111.32 1099 SENE1 0.01178 13 0.0135 14.8 555 39 Ohio 3 Allen 302020012 Premcor Refining G 1077.3 156.38 635 SENE1 0.00971 6.2 0.0172 10.9 2256 36 New 39 Greene 4192600021 St Lawrence Cement 1877.1 479.42 1062 SENE1 0.01033 11 0.0156 16.6 757 18 Indi 89 Lake 3 Bp Products North 786.62 226.25 527 SENE1 0.02961 15.6 0.0088 4.6 458 54 West 51 Marshall 2 Ppg Industries, In 1368.8 92.13 837 SENE1 0.00628 5.3 0.0413 34.6 2859 17 Illi 119 Madison 119813AAI National Steel Cor 593.44 -122.12 908 SENE1 0.01103 10 0.0126 11.5 9

10
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/

day) 

Nox 

Emis

Ran

60 24 Mary 1 Allegany 001-0011 Westvaco Fine Pape 1523.4 92.53 941 SENE1 0.00572 5.4 0.0526 49.5 2861 26 Mich 121 Muskegon A4203 S. D. Warren, Musk 863.45 407.17 342 SENE1 0.01257 4.3 0.01 3.4 3862 55 Wisc 141 Wood 772010140 Stora Enso No. Ame 569.27 510.68 368 SENE1 0.01451 5.3 0.0088 3.3 2863 39 Ohio 17 Butler 1409010006 Ak Steel Corporati 1074.3 17.69 765 SENE1 0.00801 6.1 0.0127 9.7 2264 48 Texa 201 Harris 39 Deer Park Plant 181.22 -1140.9 2005 SENE1 0.0094 18.8 0.011 21.9 265 54 West 3 Berkeley 6 Capitol Cement Cor 1615.5 106.66 1000 SENE1 0.0116 11.6 0.009 9 666 17 Illi 99 La_Salle 099816AAF Lone Star Industri 660.86 171.62 608 SENE1 0.00628 3.8 0.0178 10.8 4267 18 Indi 17 Cass 5 Essroc Cement Corp 886.86 133.3 617 SENE1 0.00768 4.7 0.0114 7 3468 51 Virg 23 Botetourt 3 Roanoke Cement Com 1486.1 -140.6 1094 SENE1 0.00772 8.4 0.0109 11.9 1269 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 22 Willamette Industr 1280.3 -281.22 1117 SENE1 0.00741 8.3 0.0113 12.6 1370 48 Texa 167 Galveston 1 Texas City Refiner 202.52 -1179 2034 SENE1 0.00959 19.5 0.0088 17.8 271 48 Texa 139 Ellis 22 Holcim (Texas) Lp 2.71 -830.73 1792 SENE1 0.01077 19.3 0.0081 14.6 272 45 Sout 75 Orangeburg 1860-0005 Holcim:Holly Hill 1533.3 -599.62 1512 SENE1 0.00721 10.9 0.0114 17.2 773 18 Indi 19 Clark 8 Essroc Cement Corp 973.34 -115.29 873 SENE1 0.00614 5.4 0.0146 12.7 2874 28 Miss 59 Jackson 2805900058 Chevron Products C 805.08 -1022.4 1772 SENE1 0.00728 12.9 0.0105 18.6 575 48 Texa 233 Hutchinson 15 Borger Refinery -393.25 -467.47 1739 SENE1 0.00522 9.1 0.0225 39.1 1176 37 Nort 117 Martin 3711700069 Weyerhaeuser Compa 1802.1 -257.21 1386 SENE1 0.00948 13.1 0.0082 11.3 577 17 Illi 115 Macon 115015AAE Archer Daniels Mid 688.52 16.11 750 SENE1 0.01511 11.3 0.0062 4.6 778 19 Iowa 139 Muscatine 70-01-004 Grain Processing C 493.3 171.15 679 SENE1 0.00453 3.1 0.0411 27.9 5379 55 Wisc 87 Outagamie 445030960 Stora Enso No. Ame 688.7 507.13 291 SENE1 0.00564 1.6 0.0158 4.6 9180 54 West 51 Marshall 11 Venco Moundsville 1369.3 103.48 829 SENE1 0.0046 3.8 0.0317 26.2 4281 28 Miss 87 Lowndes 2808700025 Holnam Inc, Artesi 776.03 -700.15 1451 SENE1 0.0073 10.6 0.009 13.1 882 18 Indi 129 Posey 2 Ge Plastics Mt. Ve 792.71 -187.85 939 SENE1 0.00689 6.5 0.0098 9.2 2083 42 Penn 95 Northampto 420950006 Hercules Cement Co 1805.9 300.02 1057 SENE1 0.0067 7.1 0.0097 10.2 1784 1 Alab 103 Morgan 10 Solutia, Inc 909.72 -543.84 1294 SENE1 0.00503 6.5 0.0178 23.1 2085 17 Illi 119 Madison 119090AAA Toscopetro Corp 597.73 -106.12 892 SENE1 0.00949 8.5 0.0071 6.3 1286 42 Penn 73 Lawrence 420730024 Cemex Inc/Wampum C 1388.7 225.03 752 SENE1 0.00578 4.3 0.0124 9.3 3787 48 Texa 139 Ellis 2 North Texas Cement -0.39 -829.74 1793 SENE1 0.0061 10.9 0.0105 18.9 788 26 Mich 65 Ingham K3249 Michigan State Uni 1016.9 371.28 413 SENE1 0.0048 2 0.0195 8.1 7889 51 Virg 101 King_Willi 1 Stone Container Co 1758.9 -76.26 1228 SENE1 0.00592 7.3 0.0108 13.2 16

11
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/

day) 

Nox 

Emis

Ran

90 42 Penn 95 Northampto 420950012 Keystone Portland 1796 293.91 1050 SENE1 0.00622 6.5 0.0091 9.6 2091 5 Arka 3 Ashley 500300013 Georgia-Pacific Co 483.48 -742.27 1536 SENE1 0.0071 10.9 0.0077 11.7 792 55 Wisc 73 Marathon 737009570 Mosinee Paper Corp 576.5 554.53 335 SENE1 0.00559 1.9 0.011 3.7 8293 47 Tenn 65 Hamilton 3070 Signal Mountain Ce 1055.4 -474.82 1241 SENE1 0.00855 10.6 0.0064 8 894 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700063 Keewatin Taconite 341.99 853.46 518 SENE1 0.03748 19.4 0.0044 2.3 295 42 Penn 47 Elk 420470005 Weyerhaeuser/Johns 1510.5 317.92 789 SENE1 0.00488 3.9 0.0145 11.5 4296 51 Virg 93 Isle_of_Wi 6 International Pape 1770.6 -171.35 1302 SENE1 0.00433 5.6 0.0201 26.2 2597 18 Indi 89 Lake 318 Isg Indiana Harbor 788.82 225.39 527 SENE1 0.01281 6.8 0.0051 2.7 1898 42 Penn 95 Northampto 420950127 Essroc/Nazareth Ce 1802.7 297.77 1055 SENE1 0.00556 5.9 0.0104 11 2499 17 Illi 31 Cook ORD O'hare Airport 748.32 256.51 503 SENE1 0.06204 31.2 0.0042 2.1 

100 48 Texa 245 Jefferson 4 Port Arthur Refine 295.78 -1122.4 1952 SENE1 0.00774 15.1 0.0062 12.2 4101 54 West 73 Pleasants 6 Cabot Corporation- 1333.6 40.93 858 SENE1 0.00384 3.3 0.0348 29.8 49102 42 Penn 73 Lawrence 420730026 Essroc/Bessemer 1373.2 233 735 SENE1 0.01675 12.3 0.0044 3.2 5103 51 Virg 670 Hopewell_C 26 Honeywell Nylon In 1724.5 -110.82 1227 SENE1 0.0285 35 0.004 4.9 104 22 Loui 89 St_Charles 79 Shell Chemical Lp/ 639.64 -1087.8 1849 SENE1 0.02 37 0.0037 6.8 105 22 Loui 19 Calcasieu 69 Venco/Lake Charles 354.38 -1087.5 1902 SENE1 0.00341 6.5 0.0394 74.9 20106 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700061 Hibbing Taconite C 312.33 829.93 543 SENE1 0.03345 18.2 0.0032 1.7 3107 26 Mich 43 Dickinson B7192 International Pape 701.73 678.23 164 SENE1 0.02807 4.6 0.0029 0.5 35108 46 Sout 103 Pennington 28.1121-02 Gcc Dacotah -500.27 470.86 1378 SENE1 0.01507 20.8 0.0033 4.5 1109 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 2 Rc Cement Company 577.69 -182.41 970 SENE1 0.01488 14.4 0.0023 2.3 4110 42 Penn 39 Crawford 420390012 Ppg Ind Inc/Works 1384.9 297.94 700 SENE1 0.01674 11.7 0.002 1.4 6111 42 Penn 41 Cumberland 420410013 Ppg Ind Inc/Works 1665.8 196.8 986 SENE1 0.01735 17.1 0.0015 1.5 3112 27 Minn 53 Hennepin 27053XMSP Minneapolis-St Pau 298.25 547.7 587 SENE1 0.01506 8.8 0.0015 0.9 12113 27 Minn 137 St_Louis 2713700062 Ispat Inland Minin 344.47 852.92 516 SENE1 0.02763 14.2 0.0013 0.7 4114 22 Loui 39 Evangeline 1 Cabot Corporation/ 456.09 -1015.5 1808 SENE1 0.00174 3.1 0.0273 49.4 51115 22 Loui 47 Iberville 8 Dow Chemical Co/La 557.14 -1058.1 1831 SENE1 0.01499 27.4 0.0007 1.3 116 17 Illi 197 Will 197803AAK Chicago Carbon Co 740.81 220.67 540 SENE1 0.00117 0.6 0.0304 16.4 200117 22 Loui 33 East_Baton 21 Great Lakes Carbon 554.41 -1028.3 1802 SENE1 0.00092 1.7 0.0452 81.4 90118 1 Alab 53 Escambia 7 Exxonmobil Product 920.59 -943.87 1695 SENE1 0.00056 0.9 0.0282 47.8 100119 47 Tenn 163 Sullivan 7 Seaman Corporation 1314.2 -273.47 1123 SENE1 0.01782 20 0.0001 0.1 2

12
Obs State 

ID 

State 

Name 

Count

y ID 

County 

Name 

Facility ID Facility Name X grid Y Grid Min 

Dist 

Class I 

Area 

Q/d for 

Nox 

Nox 

Emis 

(tons/ 

day) 

Q/d for 

SO2 

SO2 

Emis 

(tons/

day) 

Nox 

Emis

Ran

120 21 Kent 91 Hancock 2109100004 Century Aluminum O 890.34 -177.37 927 SENE1 0.00044 0.4 0.0344 31.9 200121 39 Ohio 3 Allen 302020015 Bp Chemicals, Inc. 1076.8 155.42 636 SENE1 0.01535 9.8 8E-05 0.1 10122 28 Miss 67 Jones 2806700010 Transcontinental G 753 -875.43 1627 SENE1 0.01639 26.7 8E-05 0.1 1123 29 Miss 93 Iron 8 Doe Run Company-Gl 554.08 -259.61 1051 SENE1 0.00026 0.3 0.1874 196.9 300124 48 Texa 39 Brazoria 41 Plant B 157.03 -1224 2091 SENE1 0.01545 32.3 1E-05 0 125 26 Mich 97 Mackinac N3758 Great Lakes Gas Tr 891.29 735.74 44 SENE1 0.02466 1.1 1E-05 0 100126 51 Virg 11 Appomattox 11 Transco Station 17 1587.1 -134.93 1151 SENE1 0.01639 18.9 1E-05 0 2127 26 Mich 9 Antrim B7198 Anr-Coldsprings/ B 946.7 599.21 179 SENE1 0.01762 3.1 0 0 51128 29 Miss 99 Jefferson 3 Doe Run Company-He 575.2 -171.7 961 SENE1 0.00008 0.1 0.075 72 600129 26 Mich 35 Clare N5581 Farwell Compressor 962.06 500.82 273 SENE1 0.021 5.7 0 0 25130 17 Illi 31 Cook 031600AMC Ltv Steel Co 780.85 227.97 526 SENE1 0.04441 23.3 0 0 1131 28 Miss 121 Rankin 2812100036 Pursue Energy Corp 662.47 -843.93 1604 SENE1 0.00001 0 0.0279 44.7 1000132 4 Ariz 7 Gila 40072435 Asarco - Ray Compl -1271 -590.46 2508 SENE1 . . 0.037 92.7 3000133 18 Indi 89 Lake 383 Cokenergy Inc. 791.75 227.82 524 SENE1 . . 0.0406 21.3 3000

13
Appendix 10F 

 

OTC-LADCO Letter to EPA 
June 11, 2008 

Robert J. Meyers 

Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator 

Office of Air and Radiation 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Meyers: 

Regional transport of air pollutants in the U.S. is a major problem that can only be remedied by 

cooperation between state and federal governments. Over the years, a number of states and 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have worked together successfully as part 

of the Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG) and more recently on ozone and particulate 

matter (PM) programs. In looking ahead at our future air quality challenges, such as meeting 

the new national standards for fine particles (PM2.5) and ozone, and the need for further 

progress in improving visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas, we believe that it is time for 

the states and USEPA to sit down once again and map out an approach for managing air 

quality, as called for by the National Research Council in its 2004 report. 

We hereby request that the USEPA enter into a dialogue with us to address the multi-pollutant 

air quality problems in the U.S.; in particular, nonattainment for ozone and PM2.5, and visibility 

impairment due to regional haze. We believe that these discussions should, at a minimum, 

address the following: 

• Establish a common understanding of the reductions expected to be necessary to 

address ozone and PM2.5 nonattainment, and visibility problems. We anticipate that 

existing (and forthcoming) state and federal regulations will provide for further 

improvement in air quality, but will not be enough to attain and maintain national 

ambient air quality standards everywhere in the U.S. for ozone and PM2.5, especially 

in light of the new ozone standard, or achieve the goals for visibility in all mandatory 

Class I Federal areas. States are taking an important first step in coming up with a 

solution by analyzing the potential for additional reductions from a number of key 

contributing source sectors, which we will bring to the table. 

• Identify strategies for achieving effective, equitable, and necessary emission 

reductions from all important contributing source sectors. Traditional and innovative 

measures should be considered, as well as consideration for implementing national 

regulations and programs based on cost-effective and technically feasible state and 

regional control measures already in place. Possible measures include a third phase 

of reductions for electrical generating units (EGUs), controls for existing industrial, 

commercial, and institutional (ICI) boilers, programs to reduce primary (and 

secondary) emissions from on-road and off-road mobile sources, and maintaining and 

strengthening inspection and maintenance programs. 

1
• Determine appropriate regulatory approaches for achieving these emission reductions 

under the existing framework of the Clean Air Act. These approaches would be 

designed to utilize the effectiveness and uniformity provided by federal programs while 

providing for important regional differences and administrative flexibility. 

We look forward to working in partnership with USEPA to address our air quality problems. 

Sincerely, 

_____________________ ____________________ 

Connecticut Delaware 

_____________________ ____________________ 

District of Columbia Illinois 

____________________ _____________________ 

Maine Maryland 

_____________________ _____________________ 

Massachusetts Michigan 

_____________________ ____________________ 

New Hampshire New Jersey 

 ____________________ 

 Ohio 

 

_____________________ ____________________ 

Pennsylvania Rhode Island 

 

_____________________ ____________________ 

Vermont Wisconsin 

2

f~~

A4~

VL 7f --

~~SfL4~

4(j)j}J

~.-jJ_'

)ht:k~

le;fvork iii - ~~~c~

h~a"r- . /