alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6442

STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus OFFICER TAYLOR, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in individual and official capacity; OFFICER STAPLETON, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in individual and official capacity; OFFICER HOUSTON, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued individual and official capacity; OFFICER FISHER, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in individual and official capacity; OFFICER ROLAND, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in individual and official capacity; OFFICER PATTERSON, Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional Institution sued, in individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00229) Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 11, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Stanley E. Corbett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find that the undisputed facts do not support an inference that the officers’ use of force was malicious or wanton. Because we find as a matter of law that their conduct does not satisfy the subjective requirement of an Eighth Amendment violation, we do not reach the objective requirement. See Hudson v. McMillian , 503 U.S. 1, 6-8 (1992). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for that reason. See Corbett v. Taylor , No. 1:06-cv-00229 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2007). We deny Corbett’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 578.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 578.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 596.802 Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action which the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to section 321 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1254 (18 U.S.C. 2332d), may be taken by the Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.

[61 FR 43463, Aug. 23, 1996. Redesignated at 62 FR 45112, Aug. 25, 1997]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/24

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### Milton RUDOLPH, et al., Appellants, v. TITLE & TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA, and Dade Commonwealth Title & Abstract Company, Appellees.

No. 80-2259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 11, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1981.

*1276Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, for appellants. Lewis H. Fogle, Jr. and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ, and BASKIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the Final Judgment entered by the trial court subsequent to the direction of a verdict in favor of appellees. Appellants purchased leasehold estates in condominium units at the Eastern Shores White House. Their purchases and the nature of their interests were evidenced by documents they signed including “Formal Purchase Agreement and Receipt”, condominium deed, and “Acknowledgment and Acceptance by Grantee.” In each of these documents, appellants acknowledged by their signatures that they accepted leasehold titles to condominium units upon land which was the subject of a ninety-nine year lease to the developer. The Declaration of Condominium also reflected the ninety-nine year lease.

In a class action, appellants sought to collect damages for breach of title insurance policies which insured fee simple interests in the condominium units.1

Appellants, having purchased leaseholds, were insured only against defects in their title to the leaseholds. The title insurance company that issued the insurance upon purchase should have been aware from public records that leaseholds and not fee simple interests were obtained by the purchasers, but through inadvertent error, the title insurance company misstated the interests it insured. Furthermore, the policy excluded loss or damage by reason of the original ninety-nine year lease from Gladys Goldman as trustee-lessor to Milton F. Stein-hardt as lessee.

Appellants were not induced to purchase their properties by the title insurance they later obtained. The purpose of the insurance is to indemnify an insured against loss through defects of title to purchased property. *See*9 Appleman, *Insurance Law and Practice,*§ 5201 at 1 (1981); 18 Fla.Jur., *Insurance*§ 13 (1971). Appellants’ claims were not predicated upon defects in title but upon the failure of the title insurance company to produce fee simple title. The title insurance company had no obligation to produce or indemnify fee simple title and was therefore entitled to directed verdict.

Upon consideration of the appeal and cross-appeal, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

1

. During the jury trial, appellees sought a directed verdict. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge indicated that he had decided to grant the directed verdict but would permit the jury to decide the case so that in the event of reversal he would not be forced to retry the matter. The jurors returned a verdict for appellants in the sum of $2,380,000.
Home2001 Treaties and Agreements...Cameroon (01-910) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences

# 									Cameroon (01-910) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 10, 2001

Scientific and Technological Cooperation:  Earth Sciences

Signed at Reston and Yaounde July 11 and September 10, 2001; entered into force September 10, 2001.

With Annexes.
Download Attachment						 [905 KB]

Tags

CameroonScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 7, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1748

Lower Tribunal No. 20-17556

________________

Gisselle Manzzo,

Appellant,

vs.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Gisselle Manzzo, in proper person.

Bitman O’Brien & Morat, PLLC, and Allison Morat (Lake Mary); The 

Griffith Law Firm, P.A., and Derek R. Griffith , for appellees.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               10809
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     18096
<PP&E>                                              252985
<DEPRECIATION>                                      251851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       21430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               239036
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         114102
<COMMON>                                              8661
<OTHER-SE>                                         (340369)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         21430
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     27520
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       115290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (90919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (90919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.01)



<FN>
<F1> Additional paid in capital less accumulated deficit
</FN>




</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
UNITED FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON
AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
(UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                 Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                                   September 30,                  September 30,
                                                 ------------------             -----------------
                                                   1996      1995                 1996     1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>                  <C>      <C> 
Computation of net income (loss)
 applicable to common stock:
Income (loss) from continuing
 operations before extraordinary items    $         95       (158)                 (97)   (408)
 
Preferred stock dividends                         (191)      (191)                (573)   (573)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) applicable to common   
 stock                                    $        (96)      (349)                (670)   (981)
=================================================================================================
Computation of average common and
 common equivalent shares:
Common shares outstanding at beginning
 of period                                       8,074      8,074                8,074   8,074
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common equivalent                         
 shares                                          8,074      8,074                8,074   8,074
================================================================================================
Net income (loss) per common and common
 equivalent share                         $      (0.01)     (0.04)               (0.08)  (0.12)
================================================================================================ 
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2733 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2733

 To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for federally 
  funded employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in 
  appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 1995

 Mr. Thompson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for federally 
  funded employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in 
  appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES FOR FEDERALLY 
              FUNDED EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 124 of Public Law 104-56 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Reimbursement to States.--If a State used State funds to 
continue carrying out a Federal program during the period beginning 
November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995, or if a State furloughed 
federally funded employees carrying out a Federal program during such 
period, the State shall be reimbursed for expenses that would have been 
paid by the Federal Government during such period had appropriations 
been available and for expenses that the State incurs if it reimburses 
such furloughed employees, together with interest theron as provided in 
section 6503(d) of title 31, United States Code. As used in this 
subsection, the term `State' has the meaning given such term by section 
6501(9) of such title.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Such section is further amended by 
striking ``(a)'' and inserting ``(a)'' after ``124.''.
                                 <all>
```
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. 1| 

P330CB-H3-2D Instruction V1.00

P330CB-H3-2D Board is designed to replace the center board inside the PHANTOM. P330CB-H3-2D has 

integrated PMU(Power manage unit) and GCU(Gimbal control unit),and has added ports for wireless video

transmission module and Zenmuse H3-2D to enhance the compatibility with H3-2D.

For NAZA-M Firmware version V3.12 or above,Assistant software version V2.12 or above.

Introduction 

To battery Note: only 3S battery is allowed

GPS port, Connect GPS module with GPS cable

To X3 port on MC

To EXP port on MC

Installation position for MC

Reserved

Connect to wireless video transmitter with a 3pin cable Connect to 8pin port on H3-2D Gimbal with an 8pin cable

wireless video transmitter Signal

VCC

GND

 

In the box

P330CB-H3-2D Board(1), LED Board(1), 8pin cable(1), 3pin cable(1), 3M Fixing pad(1)

Spare screws: Phillips-head screws M2.0*6.5(5) and M1.6*4(3)

Self-prepared tools

Allen screw driver, Phillips-head screw driver, soldering iron, cable ties, scissors

Assembly steps

1、Disassemble the 4 propellers of the PHANTOM.(Disassemble 4 prop guards too if they are assembled) 

2、Remove screws on 4 arms to open the top cover of PHANTOM. Below shows the positions of screws to be 

removed on one arm. 

Fig.1 Screws to be removed 
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. 2| 

3、Disassemble the original center board inside the PHANTOM 

(1)Cut off the cable ties to release the USB cable fixing to the center board.(A1) 

(2)Disconnect the connections with the MC.(B1-B2) 

(3)Desolder the ESC cables(C1-C4) connected to the center board. 

(4)Remove the screws(D1-D4)to disassemble the original center board.

A1 B1

B2

C3

C1 C2

C4 D3

D1 D2

D4

Fig.2 Disassemble items

To M4 port on MC

To LED port on MC

To M1 port on MC

To M3 port on MC

To GPS port on P330CB-H3-2D

To X2 port on MC

To M2 port on MC

Fig.3 Original center board is disassembled
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. 3| 

4、Disassemble the original LED Board, assemble the new LED Board 

LED Shell Screws

LED Board

Fig.4 Replace the LED Board

5、Assemble P330CB-H3-2D 

(1)Remove the MC from the original center board and assemble the MC on P330CB-H3-2D Board with 3M 

fixing pad, make sure the MC is assembled in the direction shown below.

(2)Assemble the P330CB-H3-2D Board with screws(D1-D4).

(3)Solder the ESC cables to the P330CB-H3-2D Board as VCC to V and GND to G.

(4)Connect the cables to the MC then tidy and check the final connections.

C3

C2 C1

C4 D3

D1 D2

D4

Fig.5 Assemble and solder
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. 4| 

Push off the white soft plug, then make the 8pin cable thread the hole on the bottom board of M2 arm

Connect to wireless video transmitter

Connect the 8pin cable to the 8pin port on the gimbal before you mount the Damping unit and gimbal

Fig.6 Final connections

6、Reassemble the covers and propellers, please make sure the cover points to the right nose 

direction and the rotating marks on propellers are in accordance with the marks on the cover.
****U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics****
| **BJS home page**
**Publications**
**What's         new**
Relevant topics     Indigent defense
-     Expenditure & Employment      Indigent Defense Services in Large Counties, 1999
  This report details the methods by which criminal indigent defense is delivered in the Nation's 100 most populous counties.  It compares the operating expenditures, staffing and caseload of public defender, assigned counsel, and contract services used in these counties.  The criminal indigent defense programs examined in the report primarily handled felony criminal cases at the trial level.  11/00  NCJ  184932 

**Press release** (5K) |   **Acrobat         file** (153K) | **ASCII         file** (36K) **Spreadsheets** (zip format 18K) 
**About         the source data** |    **Codebooks        & data sets**--> | **To order paper version**
 Help for         using BJS products**BJS home page      | Top of this page**
Bureau of Justice Statistics        www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/Send comments toaskbjs@ojp.usdoj.gov
 
OJP Freedom of Information Act pagePrivacy Statement and         DisclaimersPage last revised on *November 29, 2000* |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 582.406 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked.

Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 582.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 582.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #18, May 7 - 13, 2008

From October 1, 2007 to April 20, 2008, a widespread 

area of Afghanistan has received below normal 

precipitation. The USGS analysis indicates that 

precipitation deficits exceed 200 mm in the eastcentral parts of Afghanistan. During late February 

and March, above normal temperatures have 

resulted in an early melt of a below normal snow 

pack. Snow rapidly melted away from the central 

highlands, four to six weeks earlier than normal. The 

lack of winter precipitation coupled with an early 

snow melt may result in a lack of adequate water 

resources. During the next week, mostly dry weather 

will be accompanied by above normal 

temperatures. Rapid snow melt is likely during early 

May with extreme heat expected in the lowlands. 

1) A widespread area of Afghanistan has

experienced below normal precipitation

during the winter and an early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures

above 38 °C will affect the southwest and

north-central parts of Afghanistan.

Figure 2. Accumulated liquid precipitation forecast, in 

mm, May 2 - 9, 2008 

Figure 3. Snow Depth Change (cm) Ending May 9 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan