alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Bureau of Counterterrorism Releases

620 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kyrgyz Republic	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kazakhstan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Sri Lanka	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: India	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Turkmenistan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Bangladesh	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Afghanistan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Yemen	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Peru	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: United Arab Emirates	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1…34567…62next page

Back to Top
#### Joseph H. BELLINA, M.D. v. Ceil Mary Ross, Wife of Joseph H. BELLINA, M.D.

No. 82-C-0842.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re Joseph H. Beilina, applying for reconsideration of denied writ of May 7,1982. Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Civil District Court. Parish of Orleans. 414 So.2d 385.

Not considered. Rule 9 § 6 Louisiana Supreme court Rules.
#### § 586.306 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Samuel PROCTER v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 63499.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Samuel Procter applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. It is ordered that the trial judge act upon relator’s petition.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                          ALFIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                      January 31,                         anuary 31
                                                1996               1995           1996                 1995
                                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                          <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net Income                                   $   741,451       $   655,698       $ 1,176,555       $   705,899
                                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Weighted average number
of shares outstanding                         11,519,311        11,402,904        11,519,311        11,402,904

Add:
   Common Stock
   Equivalents under 1983 option plan              1,032              --               1,269              --

   Common Stock
   Equivalents under 1993 option plan            103,175              --             126,866              --

   Common Stock
   Equivalents represented by Warrants             7,936              --              67,164              --
                                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Weighted average number of
Shares used in earnings per share             11,631,454        11,402,904        11,714,610        11,402,904
Earnings per share                           $      0.06       $      0.06       $      0.10       $      0.06
                                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

</TABLE>





                          ALFIN, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES



                                      11
§ 535.902 Set-offs by U.S. owned or controlled firms abroad. ( a ) Branches and subsidiaries in foreign countries of persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are licensed to set-off their claims against Iran or Iranian entities by debit to blocked accounts held by them for Iran or Iranian entities.
( b ) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section is revoked as of January 19, 1981.
( c ) For purposes of this section, set-offs include combinations of accounts and any similar actions.
(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12205, 45 FR 24099; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26685; E.O. 12276, 46 FR 7913; E.O. 12279, 46 FR 7919; E.O. 12280, 46 FR 7921; E.O. 12281, 46 FR 7923; E.O. 12282, 46 FR 7925; E.O. 12283, 46 FR 7927, and E.O. 12294, 46 FR 14111)
[46 FR 14337, Feb. 26, 1981]
#### § 546.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Sudan Stabilization Sanctions Regulations sanctions page on OFAC's website: *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

[74 FR 25432, May 28, 2009, as amended at 89 FR 15749, Mar. 5, 2024]
# Europos Sąjungos C 44A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0960
  doi:10.3000/19770960.CA2012.044.lit |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 44A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 55 tomas2012m. vasario 16d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

doi:10.3000/19770960.CA2012.044.lit

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 44A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

55 tomas2012m. vasario 16d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2012/C 044A/01 | Pranešimų apie konkursus COM/AD/01/10 ir COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ir COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ir COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ir COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ir COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ir COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ir COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ir COM/AD/16/10 klaidų ištaisymas (OL C 265 A, 2010 9 30) | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2012/C 044A/01

Pranešimų apie konkursus COM/AD/01/10 ir COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ir COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ir COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ir COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ir COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ir COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ir COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ir COM/AD/16/10 klaidų ištaisymas (OL C 265 A, 2010 9 30)

(OL C 265 A, 2010 9 30)

1

OFICIALIOJO LEIDINIO C A SERIJOS KONKURSAI APŽVALGA

Toliau pateikiamas šiais metais išleistų C A serijos leidinių sąrašas.

Jei nenurodyta kitaip, Oficialieji leidiniai yra išleisti visomis kalbomis.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 16.2.2012 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2012

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 44/1

---

Pranešimų apie konkursus COM/AD/01/10 ir COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 ir COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 ir COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 ir COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 ir COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 ir COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 ir COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 ir COM/AD/16/10 klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 265 A, 2010 m. rugsėjo 30 d.
  )

(2012/C 44 A/01)

Pranešimų apie viešus konkursus VI skirsnyje (p. 6, 19, 28, 36, 49, 58, 70, 82)

yra:

„VI.   REZERVO SĄRAŠAI

| 1. | Į rezervo sąrašą įtraukti kandidatai |
| --- | --- |

1.

[...]

Rezervo sąrašai galios iki 2012 m. gruodžio 31 d.“

turi būti:

„VI.   REZERVO SĄRAŠAI

| 1. | Į rezervo sąrašą įtraukti kandidatai |
| --- | --- |

1.

[...]

Rezervo sąrašai galios iki 2014 m. gruodžio 31 d.“

---
§ 542.308 Government of Syria. The term *Government of Syria* includes: ( a ) The state and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic, as well as any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including the Central Bank of Syria;
( b ) Any entity owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the foregoing, including any corporation, partnership, association, or other entity in which the Government of Syria owns a 50 percent or greater interest or a controlling interest, and any entity which is otherwise controlled by that government;
( c ) Any person that is, or has been, acting or purporting to act, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any of the foregoing; and
( d ) Any other person determined by OFAC to be included within paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
Note 1 to § 542.308 :
The names of persons that OFAC has determined fall within this definition are published in the Federal Register and incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (“SDN List”) with the identifier “[SYRIA].” The SDN List is accessible through the following page on OFAC's Web site: *www.treasury.gov/sdn .* However, the property and interests in property of persons falling within the definition of the term *Government of Syria* are blocked pursuant to § 542.201 regardless of whether the names of such persons are published in the Federal Register or incorporated into the SDN List.
Note 2 to § 542.308 :
Section 501.807 of this chapter describes the procedures to be followed by persons seeking administrative reconsideration of OFAC's determination that they fall within the definition of the term *Government of Syria.*
[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 48317, 48318, June 6, 2024]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 1 4 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk December 1 4 , 2018

156849 (86)

RAFAELI, LLC

, and ANDRE OHANESSIAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 156849

v COA: 330696

Oakland CC: 2015

- 147429

- CZ

OAKLAND COUNTY and ANDREW MEISNER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs

- appellants to extend the time

for filing their brief is GRANTED. The b rief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before February 13, 2019.
#### Sidney I. MANN, Appellant, v. Mark ROLLINSON et al., Appellees.

No. 74-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2816 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2816

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
To reinstate the license for, and extend the deadline under the Federal 
Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in 
                      Ohio, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE AND EXTENSION DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the expiration of the license and notwithstanding 
the time period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission Project No. 3218, the Commission shall, at the request of 
the licensee for the project, reinstate the license effective September 
25, 1993, and extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of the project so as to terminate 
on September 24, 1999.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 560.318 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7572

CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

E. DAY, Food Service Manager, N.C.C.,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

G. K. WASHINGTON, 

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Williams v. Day, No. 1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. 

Nov. 26, 2012 & filed Aug. 14, 2013, entered Aug. 15, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeCases Filed Against the Republic of Peru...Amorrortu v. Peru

# 									Amorrortu v. Peru							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

Amorrortu v. Peru:  Bacilio Amorrortu, a U.S. citizen, filed a claim against the Republic of Peru, alleging that Peru violated Art. 10.5 (minimum standard of treatment) of the U.S.-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The claimant alleges that Peru, through a corrupt scheme, prevented him from securing a contract to operate oil fields.

Find further information and documents concerning this claim

07/13/2021 U.S. Article 10.20.2 Submission [129 KB] (Accessible Version [846 KB])

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsPeru

Back to Top
#### § 583.105 [Reserved]
#### JOHN T. TOMPKINS v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. 32829.

Decided January 8, 1917.]

Per Curiam :

This is the case of a lieutenant commander in the Navy claiming additional pay as aid and who served as flag lieutenant and aid under orders from the commander of the United States Pacific Fleet.

Under the decision in the case of *Knox*v. *United States.,*ante, p. 22, the plaintiff was not legally appointed aid'and was not eligible for such appointment. Therefore, his petition is dismissed.
HomeArgentina

# Argentina

135 items

        -    Department of Justice Release  		Former Iranian-Owned Boeing Aircraft Successfully Returned to the United States	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Nichols’ Travel to Argentina	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Escuelas Lincoln: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Argentina	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 20, 2023	  Matthew MillerNovember 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Election Results in Argentina	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 19, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Escuelas Lincoln: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 30, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Human Rights and Democracy  		Expanding the Global Equality Fund and Protecting Human Rights with New International Partners	  August 25, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (23-731) – Extension of Framework Agreement on Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space	  July 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Argentina Signs the Artemis Accords	  July 27, 2023 

previous page1234…14next page

Back to Top
#### § 594.304 Foreign person.

The term *foreign person* means any citizen or national of a foreign state (including any such individual who is also a citizen or national of the United States), or any entity not organized solely under the laws of the United States or existing solely in the United States, but does not include a foreign state.
#### Romie CALHOUN, IV, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 1, 1981.

*1153Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles D. Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edwin H. Duff, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

Appellant, a juvenile, charged as an adult with burglary of a dwelling, pleaded nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the denial of a motion to dismiss the information. We affirm.

Appellant’s contention that section 39.-04(2)(e)(4),1 Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), is unconstitutional has already been determined contrary to his position. *State v. Cain,*381 So.2d 1361 (Fla.1980). Appellant contends, however, that *Cain*did not address the particular area on which he relies, i. e., that the statute shifts the burden of proof to the child to show that he has not previously been found to have committed two delinquent acts, thus unconstitutionally shifting to him the burden of proof of an element of the crime.

No new element of the crime is created by the statute. The decision regarding which court should prosecute a juvenile has nothing to do with a substantive adjudication; rather, it is only the basis by which adjudication is initiated. *State v. Cain, supra.*

The statute permits the transfer of the prosecution to the juvenile division upon motion of the child, coupled with a showing that he has not “previously been found to have committed two delinquent acts, one of which involved an offense classified under Florida law as a felony.” Section 39.04(2)(e)4, *supra.*Clearly, this involves a pre-trial proceeding, and does not involve the prosecution of the crime for which the appellant is now charged. Since there is no common law, inherent, or constitutional right to be tried as a juvenile, *State v. Cain, supra,*it is incumbent on the juvenile to justify the transfer. *Carter v. State,*382 So.2d 871 (Fla.5th DCA 1980).

The trial court was correct in denying the motion to dismiss, and the judgment of conviction is

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and CO-WART, JJ., concur.

1

. “With respect to any child who at the time of commission of the alleged offense was 16 or 17 years of age, [the State Attorney may] file an information when in his judgment and discretion the public interest requires that adult sanctions be considered or imposed. Upon motion of the child, the case shall be transferred for adjudicatory proceedings as a child pursuant to § 39.09(1) if it is shown by the child that he had not previously been found to have committed two delinquent acts, one of which involved an offense classified under Florida law as a felony.”
Filed 12 / 1 / 20 P. v. Lieberman CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

AARON BE NJAMIN LIEBERMAN,
Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B 303989 (Super. Ct. No. 201 3039320 ) ( Ventura County)

Aaron Benjamin Lieberman appeals from the judgment entered after he pled no contest to possession for sale of

more than four kilograms o f M D MA ( count 1; Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11378, 11370.4, subd. (b ) (1) ) 1 , transportation of a controlled
substance ( count 3; § 11379, subd. (a) ), sale of a controlled substance (count 4; § 11379, subd. (a)), and s elling, transporting or offering to sell a co ntrolled substance ( count 5; § 11379, subd. (a) )

. Three months after the change of plea

, appellant brought a motion to withdraw his plea which was denied by the trial court. The trial court susp ended imposition of sentence, granted

1 All statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code.2

probation with 365 day s county jail , a nd ordered appellant to pay various fines, fees, and restitution

.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’ s examination of the record, he filed a brief raising no issues. On October 13, 2020 , we advi sed appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any
contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has
been received.

The reco r d reflects that appellant sold MDMA to a confidential informa nt in t wo controlled buys. The third controlled buy was a “jump bust” at the Walmart parking lot in Simi Valley . O fficers found 718 grams of MDMA and $360 on appellant’s p erson . Ventura County Sheriff’s deputies conducted a probation search of appellant’s house and found MDMA (4,000

g rams)

, marijuana, steroids

, pill presses

, narcotics paraphernalia (cutting agents), $38,920 cash, and ammunition

.

We have reviewed the entire record a nd are satisfied that appellant’ s counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no ar guable issue exists. ( People v.
Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, Acting P. J.
We concur:

PERREN, J.

TANGEMAN , J.Derek D. Malan, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, Executive Director, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# Ml-fV

COA# 05-12-01455-CR 

### OFFENSE: 36.06 

## STYLE: Bryan Baum v. The State of Texas COUNTY: Rockwall COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 382nd Judicial District Court DATE: 8/20/2014 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 2-12-213

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

# t?u-t¥ STYLE: Bryan Baum v. The State ofTexas 

## PRO SE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: a2^////*0t5' JUDGE: fl&A, Li4AA^ACCA#: 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP: 

# rAO SB MOTION FOR 

# REHEARING IN CCAIS: JanUff JUDGE: 

# 4pr;/ A 2*/y
ELECTRONIC RECORD

### OFFICIALNOTICEFROMCOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS OFTEXAS '",LIi ^OPY P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/1/2015 mi \0/ SSS COA No. 05-12-01456-CR vS 

### BAUM, BRYAN TplQt.'Nde2^2,214/ PD-1321-14 

## Pursuantto Rule 69.4(a)T.R.A.Pr^the^reeoraJisTeturned to the court of appeals. 

## "ca22222^ Abel Acosta, Clerk 5TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK LISA MATZ 600 COMMERCE, 2ND FLOOR DALLAS, TX 75202 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *