### 52347 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality** 

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;**  **Comment Request**

**AGENCY :**  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection project:

‘‘Eisenberg Center Voluntary Customer Survey Generic Clearance for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ’’ In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection.

This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on May 20th 2010 and allowed 60 days for public comment. One comment was received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.

**DATES :**  Comments on this notice must be received by September 24, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by email at OIRA

_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer).

Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by e-mail at doris.lefkowitz(AHRQ.hhs.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Proposed Project Eisenberg Center Voluntary Customer Survey Generic Clearance for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) requests that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) renew, under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, AHRQ’s Generic Clearance to collect information from users of work products and services initiated by the John M. Eisenberg Clinical Decisions and Communications Science Center (Eisenberg Center). AHRQ is the lead agency charged with supporting research designed to improve the quality of healthcare, reduce its cost, improve patient safety, decrease medical errors, and broaden access to essential services. See 42 U.S.C. 299. AHRQ’s Eisenberg Center is an innovative effort aimed at improving communication of findings to a variety of audiences (‘‘ customers ’’ ), including consumers, clinicians, and health care policy makers. The Eisenberg Center compiles research results into a variety of useful formats for customer stakeholders. The Eisenberg Center also conducts its own program of research into effective communication of research findings in order to improve the usability and rapid incorporation of findings into medical practice. The Eisenberg Center is one of three components of AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program, see 42 U.S.C. 299b–7. For the period 2005 until September 2008, the Eisenberg Center was operated through a contractual arrangement with the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Department of Medicine, located in Portland, Oregon. In September 2008, the contract for operation of the Eisenberg Center was awarded to Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), located in Houston Texas.

The collections proposed under this clearance include activities to assist in the development of materials to be disseminated through the Eisenberg Center and to provide feedback to AHRQ on the extent to which these products meet customer needs. These materials include Summary Guides that summarize and translate the findings of comparative effectiveness reviews (CER) and research reports for purposes of summarizing research findings for various decision-making audiences, such as consumers, clinicians, or policymakers. The guides are designed to help these decision makers use research evidence to maximize the benefits of health care, minimize harm, and optimize the use of health care resources. In addition, each year of the project the Eisenberg Center will develop one computerized, interactive decision aid for those clinical problems identified from selected CERs. The intent is for the decision aid to increase the patient/consumer’s knowledge of the health condition, options, and risk/ benefits, lead to greater assurance in making a decision, increase the congruence between values and choices, and enhance involvement in the decision making process. Information collections conducted under this generic clearance are not required by regulation and will not be used to regulate or sanction customers. Surveys will be entirely voluntary, and information provided by respondents will be combined and summarized so that no individually identifiable information will be released. The Eisenberg Center will produce from 17 to a maximum of 33 Summary Guides per audience (i.e., clinician, policymaker, consumer) per year, depending on the information needed for each product with each audience.

In accordance with OMB guidelines for generic clearances for voluntary customer surveys and Executive Order 12862, AHRQ has established an independent review process to assure the development, implementation, and analysis of high quality customer surveys within AHRQ. Specifically, AHRQ understands that each activity conducted must be submitted to OMB with a supporting statement and accompanying instruments. Information collection may not proceed until approved by OMB.

Method of Collection

Information collections conducted under this clearance will be collected via the following methods:

• Focus Groups. Focus groups may include clinical professionals, patients or other health care consumers, or health policy makers. They will be used to provide input regarding the needs for products and for the development of Decision Aids and Summary Guides. Focus groups may also be used to test draft products to determine if intended information and messages are being delivered through products that are produced and disseminated through the Eisenberg Center.

• In-person or Telephone Interviews. Interviews will be conducted with individuals from one or more of the three groups identified above. The purpose of these interviews is to (1) To provide input regarding the development of Decision Aids and Summary Guides, (2) to determine if intended information and messages are being delivered effectively through products that are produced and disseminated through the Eisenberg Center, and (3) to engage the subject in cognitive testing to (a) determine if changes in topical knowledge levels can be identified following exposure to Eisenberg Center informational or instructional products, and (b) identify strengths and weaknesses in products and services for purposes of making improvements that are practical and feasible.

• Customer Satisfaction Survey for the Decision Aids. Baseline survey data will be collected on both clinician and


### 52348 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices

patient characteristics, characteristics of the health care condition, and selected outcome measures such as knowledge and decisional self-efficacy. Following delivery of the decision aid, a user survey will be completed to explore subjects’ impressions of the tool, including ease of use, clarity of presentation, length, balance of information, rating of interactive features, and overall satisfaction. Both clinicians and patients/consumers will be surveyed. For patients, the customer satisfaction survey will include decisional outcome measures (e.g., decisional conflict, desire for involvement in decision making), measures of attitudes and self-efficacy, and indicators of choice intention or actual choice made. If the aid is evaluated within a clinical context, measures of physician-patient interaction will also be considered. Additionally, clinicians may be interviewed about the impact of the aid on clinical flow.

• Customer Satisfaction Surveys for the Summary Guides. These surveys will be offered to health care professionals, consumers, and policy makers that use the online Summary Guides. Respondents will report via Likert-type or numerical response scales how specific informational or educational products or materials influenced health care or clinical practice behaviors.

• Follow-up CME Surveys. Continuing Medical Education (CME) credit will be offered to physicians who wish to participate in online activities developed around the Summary Guides for clinicians. Three months after completing the educational activity, physicians will be asked to complete a follow-up survey to assess realized changes in clinical practice, barriers to making change, and self-assessed impacts on patient care.

• Solicited Topic Nominations. Visitors to the Web site will have the opportunity to provide information about suggested topics that might be addressed through the research and dissemination efforts of the EHC
program.

• Web site Registration. Visitors to the Web site will be able to register personal contact information (e.g., name, email address) if wishing to receive updated information and materials as they become available.

• Glossary Feedback Survey. Visitors to the Web site who access the health care glossary will be asked to suggest missing terms and provide additional comments on definitions or usage sentences, if desired.

This information will be used to develop, improve and/or maintain high quality products and services to lay and health professional publics. Estimated Annual Respondent Burden

Exhibit 1 shows the estimated total burden for the respondents’ time to participate in this research. These estimates assume a maximum of 99 Summary Guides over 3 years and separate Guides for clinicians, policy makers and consumers and are thus slight overestimates.

Focus groups will be used for needs assessment and will be conducted with clinicians and consumers for development of the Summary Guides, and additionally with policymakers for those Guides in which policy recommendations are applicable. Focus groups will be conducted with no more than 3,168 persons over 3 years and will last about 1 1 ⁄ 2 hours. Once the Summary Guides aredeveloped they will be subjected to inperson or telephone interviews for purposes of usability and product testing with clinicians, policy makers and consumers. In-personltelephone interviews will be conducted twice with about 4,158 persons over 3 years and will take about 66 minutes on average. As depicted in Attachment B, two rounds of interviews will be conducted with all consumer representatives during product development, with a second round of interviews conducted occasionally with clinicians and policy makers, as needed.

Customer satisfaction surveys for the Summary Guides will be conducted with approximately 19,800 representatives from the audience to be targeted by the Summary Guides over 3 years (i.e., clinician, policymaker or consumer) and will take 5 minutes to complete.

Customer satisfaction surveys will also be administered to approximately 150 clinicians and 1,500 patients in evaluating the Decision Aid. These surveys will take about 10 minutes to complete, and will be administered before and after implementation of the Decision Aid in the study populations.

Clinicians that have completed CME accrediting requirements and are requesting CME credit will be asked to complete the follow-up CME Survey three months following completion of the online activity. This data collection will be completed with about 3,960 clinicians over 3 years and will require 5 minutes to complete.

Approximately 7,500 solicited topic nomination forms will be completed over 3 years by healthcare professional and consumer visitors to the Web site and will require about 5 minutes to complete. Web site Registration will be completed by all persons wanting to stay up-to-date with the latest information from the Eisenberg Center, about 18,000 over 3 years, and requires about 5 minutes to complete. The Glossary Feedback Survey will be completed by about 600 persons that access the glossary over a 3-year period and takes 5 minutes to complete. The total burden hours are estimated to be 18,605 over 3-years.

Exhibit 2 shows the estimated total cost burden associated with the respondents’ time to participate in this research. The cost burden is estimated to be $865,829 annually.



### E XHIBIT 

### 1—E STIMATED 

### TOTAL 

### B URDEN 

### H OURS 

### OVER 

### 3 Y EARS

Type of data collection Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Hours per response Total burden hours

Focus Groups .................................................................................................. 3,168 1 1.5 4,752 In-person/Telephone Interviews ...................................................................... 4,158 2 1.1 9,148 Customer Satisfaction Surveys for the Decision Aid ....................................... 1,650 2 10/60 550 Customer Satisfaction Surveys for the Summary Guides ............................... 19,800 1 5/60 1,650 Follow-up CME Surveys .................................................................................. 3,960 1 5/60 330 Solicited Topic Nominations ............................................................................ 7,500 1 5/60 625 Web site Registration ...................................................................................... 18,000 1 5/60 1,500 Glossary Feedback Survey ............................................................................. 600 1 5/60 50

Total .......................................................................................................... 58,836 na na 18, 605


### 52349 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices

E XHIBIT 

### 2—E STIMATED 

### TOTAL 

### C OST 

### B URDEN 

### O VER 

### 3 Y EARS

Type of data collection Number of respondents Total burden hours Average hourly wage rate* Total cost burden

Focus Groups .................................................................................................. 3,168 4,752 $46.7 1 $221,966 In-person/Telephone Interviews ...................................................................... 4,158 9,148 53.17 486,399 Customer Satisfaction Surveys for the Decision Aid ....................................... 1,650 550 24.50 13,475 Customer Satisfaction Surveys for the Summary Guides ............................... 19,800 1,650 46.71 77,072 Follow-up CME Surveys .................................................................................. 3,960 330 73.86 24,374 Solicited Topic Nominations ............................................................................ 7,500 625 19.56 12,225 Web site Registration ...................................................................................... 18,000 1,500 19.56 2 9,340 Glossary Feedback Survey ............................................................................. 600 50 19.56 978

Total .......................................................................................................... 58,836 18,605 na865,829
* Based upon the mean and weighted mean wages for clinicians (29–1062 family and general practitioners), policy makers (11–0000 management occupations, 11–3041 compensation & benefits managers, 13–1072 compensation, benefits & job analysis specialists, 11–9111 medical and health service managers, 13–2053 insurance underwriters and 15–2011 actuaries) and consumers (00–0000 all occupations). Focus groups include 528 clinicians ($77.64/hr) and 528 consumers ($20.32/hr); in-person/telephone interviews include 528 clinicians, 330 policy makers($39.91/hr) and 528 consumers; customer satisfaction surveys for the decision aid include 50 clinicians and 500 consumers; customer satisfaction surveys for the summary guides include 1,650 clinicians, 1,650 policy makers and 3,300 consumers; follow-up CME surveys include 1,320clinicians; solicited topic nominations include 1,125 clinicians, 250 policy makers and 1,125 consumers; Web site registration includes 2,700 clinicians, 600 policy makers and 2,700 consumers; glossary feedback survey includes 90 clinicians, 20 policy makers and 90 consumers, National Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 2008, ‘‘ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. ’’

Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government

The maximum cost to the Federal Government is estimated to be $1,439,003 annually. Exhibit 3 shows the total and annualized cost by the major cost components.



### E XHIBIT 

### 3—E STIMATED 

### TOTAL AND 

### A NNUALIZED 

### C OST

Cost component Total cost Annualized cost

Project Development ............................................................................................................ ................................... $1,019,970 $339,990 Data Collection Activities ..................................................................................................... .................................... 735,405 245,135 Data Processing and Analysis ................................................................................................... .............................. 1,889,505 629,835 Project Management ............................................................................................................. ................................... 557,380 185,793 Overhead ....................................................................................................................... .......................................... 114,750 38,250

Total .......................................................................................................................... ........................................ 4,317,010 1,439,003

Request for Comments

In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act legislation, comments on AHRQ’s information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ healthcare research and healthcare information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency’s subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record.

Dated: August 9, 2010. Carolyn M. Clancy,

Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–20913 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4160–90–M**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**National Institutes of Health**

**Proposed Collection; Comment Request; NCCAM Office of**  **Communications and Public Liaison Communications Program Planning**  **and Evaluation Research**

**SUMMARY :**  In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.

Proposed Collection: Title: NCCAM Office of Communications and Public Liaison Communications Program Planning and Evaluation Research. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension.

Need and Use of Information Collection: To carry out NCCAM’s legislative mandate to educate and disseminate information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to a wide variety of audiences and organizations, the NCCAM Office of Communications and Public Liaison (OCPL) requests clearance to carry out formative research of a variety of print and online materials, outreach activities, and messages to maximize their impact and usefulness.