alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations...Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations  Releases

# Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations Releases

121 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Peace and Security  		Belize/Engagement Report [Archive]	  July 1, 2012 

previous page1…111213

Back to Top
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03415

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03415\03415_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03415\03415_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03415\03415_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03415\03415_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03415\03415_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03415\03415_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03415\03415_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03415\03415_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03415\Certification Statement_03415.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03415\Supporting Documentation\03415_A5-2 Map v3.0.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03415\Supporting Documentation\03415_A5-3 Water Balance Diagram v3.0.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03415\Supporting Documentation\03415_Assumptions List.txt EPA Technical Review Notes

03415\Supporting Documentation\03415_Water Questionnaire Cover Letter v2.0.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 5: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 5: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 5 [652 KB]

7. Crystallex Int’l Corp. v. Venezuela statement of interest (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

8. Crystallex Exhibit 1 (Abrams letter) (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

9. Crystallex Exhibit 2 (Gacki letter) (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

10. In re Evison statement of interest (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

11. In re Evison Exhibit (Sullivan declaration) (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

12. PDVSA v. MUFG statement of interest (including exhibits) (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Condemning Republika Srpska Actions that Undermine the Dayton Peace Agreement

# 									Condemning Republika Srpska Actions that Undermine the Dayton Peace Agreement							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

June 29, 2023

The Republika Srpska National Assembly adopted a law this week intended to nullify the Constitutional Court’s authority in the entity.  This law violates the Bosnia and Herzegovina Constitution, and runs counter to the Dayton Peace Agreement.  Defiance of the Constitutional Court threatens not just the rule of law but also the stability, security, and prosperity of Bosnia and Herzegovina.  Combined with the anti-Dayton rhetoric by some Republika Srpska leaders, the law represents a dangerous escalation in secessionist threats.  The United States strongly supports the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and multiethnic character of Bosnia and Herzegovina.  We will continue to hold individuals engaged in activities that run counter to the Dayton Peace Agreement responsible for their actions.

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRule of Law

Back to Top
#### Timothy O. TRIBBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1975.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 585.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, *see* part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Hong Kong-Related Sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72144-72145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fifth RTCA SC-235 Non Rechargeable Lithium Batteries Plenary 
Session

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Fifth RTCA SC-235 Non Rechargeable Lithium Batteries Plenary 
Session.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Fifth RTCA SC-235 Non Rechargeable Lithium Batteries Plenary 
Session.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 15-16, 2016 09:00 a.m.-05:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

[[Page 72145]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org or 
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Fifth RTCA SC-235 Non Rechargeable 
Lithium Batteries Plenary Session. The agenda will include the 
following:

Tuesday, November 15, 2016--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting-Minutes Review
5. FAA Tech Center Testing Update
6. Status Discussion of Internal Comment Review
7. Review of program schedule
8. Action Item Review
9. Any other Business
10. Date and Place of Next Meeting
11. Adjourn

Wednesday, November 16, 2016--9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 13, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-25186 Filed 10-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                       347
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,092
<PP&E>                                          19,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,866
<SALES>                                         13,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,860
<CGS>                                            6,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                       993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
#### Krishan VASHISTHA and Aruna Vashistha, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendants, and Jack Martin; Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-56987.

D.C. No. CV-97-04758 R.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 2000.

Submission Vacated March 9, 2000.

Decided Feb. 16, 2001.

Before BROWNING, BEEZER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER *

This case resubmitted for decision as of February 15, 2001.

*402The parties, through their respective counsel, have stipulated that the appeal in the above-entitled case should be dismissed and that each of the parties shall bear their own costs. After consideration of the stipulation and a review of the court’s file, it is,

ORDERED that this appeal is resubmitted as of the date of the filing of this order and this appeal should be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and with each of the parties to bear their own costs.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Click here to skip navigation
follow this link to enable alert boxes for your session profile

follow this link to disable alert boxes for your session profile

Official Website of the Office of Personnel Management

            - Contact FEB Operations
            - FAQs

                -  All of OPM
                -  About
                -  Policy
                -  Insurance
                -  Retirement
                -  Investigations
                -  Agency Services
                -  News
                -  FAQs

          - 
          - Cincinnati FEB

            -  Committees + Councils 
            -  Resources 
            -  Events Calendar 
            -  Contact Us 

          - Select Location

# Cincinnati, Ohio

## Federal Executive Board

FEB.govLocationsCincinnati

## About this FEB

The Greater Cincinnati Federal Executive Board (GCFEB) is comprised of 100 Federal agencies which represent over 14,000 Federal employees. The Federal Government is one of the largest employers in the state. The Cincinnati FEB strives to provide a clear and effective communications medium between Federal agencies as well as all levels of government. Nothing can be more important to Federal organizations than "partnering" with other government entities and community groups. To this end, the FEB brings diverse parties to the table and facilitates valuable collaboration. The FEB employs Lines of Business focusing on Emergency Preparedness, Security, Employee Safety and Human Capital Readiness to ensure Federal employees are prepared for any disaster or contingency; and to provide an avenue for exposure to resources to enhance work productivity. As one of 28 FEBs nationwide, the Cincinnati FEB coordinates the sharing of services between agencies, and participates as a unified Federal force in local civic affairs.

## Board Leadership

Vice Chairperson

Katheryn Myers Giesting

More info

District Manager, Social Security Administration

Chairperson

Timothy Comer

More info

Administrative Officer, Internal Revenue Service

## Events Calendar

There are no events planned for this FEB location.

          - About
          - Locations
          - Plans & Reports
          - FAQs

Official website of the U.S. Government operated by the Office of Personnel Management
          - Accessibility
          - Privacy Policy
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act Data
          - USA.Gov

          -
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate ldentifier: 2010~NM-030-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Cou.ld the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action",?

YES () explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES () explalll NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 560.702 Detention of shipments.

Import shipments into the United States of Iranian-origin goods in violation of § 560.201 and export shipments from the United States of goods destined for Iran in violation of § 560.204 shall be detained. No such import, export, or reexport will be permitted to proceed, except as specifically authorized by or on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury. Unless licensed, such shipments are subject to penalty or seizure and forfeiture action, under the customs laws or other applicable provisions of law, depending on the circumstances.
#### § 569.313 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Leonard Paul HEBB and Charles Ronald Tolliver, Appellees.

No. 81-1501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 25, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

William T. Laswell of William T. Laswell, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This case is hereby reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord with the decision rendered in *State v. Benitez,*395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981).

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.
#### § 585.502 [Reserved]
#### Ex parte Wesley O. PAYNE. (Re Wesley O. PAYNE v. DIRECTOR OF the DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, et al.)

80-868.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 30, 1981.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00546-CV

Jeffrey Benjamin Mason, Appellant

v.

Keri Cotterman Mason, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-16-001306, HONORABLE LORA LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant JeffreyBenjamin Mason has filed a motion to review supersedeas bond in

connection with his appeal of the trial court’s final decree of divorce. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a).

Appellant has also filed an emergency motion for temporary orders or, alternatively, emergency

motion for injunction. We grant the emergencymotion for temporary orders and stay execution and

enforcement of the final decree of divorce, pending further orders of this Court. See id. R. 24.4(c).

Appellant’s emergencymotion for injunction is denied. We request that the appellee file a response

to the motion to review supersedeas bond no later than November 17, 2017.

It is ordered November 3, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland
#### § 584.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-218-CV

GALE LEON FORD APPELLANT

V.

BILLIE JOAN FORD APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

On August 11, 2008, we notified appellant that his brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not

received any response.
2

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED: August 29, 2008
#### § 561.302 UNSC Resolution 1737.

The term *UNSC Resolution* *1737* means United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737, adopted December 23, 2006.
- Office Home
- About Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Political-Military Affairs...Office of Congressional and Public Affairs

# Office of Congressional and Public Affairs

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Congressional and Public Affairs (CPA) is responsible for facilitating effective communication and interaction between the Assistant Secretary and the staff of the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs and the Congress, foreign and domestic media, and the general public. CPA is responsible for managing the PM Bureau’s congressional affairs, public affairs, and public diplomacy functions.				

Back to Top
#### Mauro Tenesci, Appellant, *v.*Societa Italiano Abruzzo, Etc., Respondent.

Appeal from judgment of the First District Court of the city of Wew York, rendered in favor of the defendant.

Sewards & Sewards, for appellant.

Thomas J. Purdy, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The justice, in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant, made the following indorsement upon the' back of the summons: *“*Judgment for the defendant, as he failed to *764comply with, the by-laws, and further that bib sickness-Was not such as to prevent him working.” Am examination of the return,, as - amended, discloses the-fact that the by-laws upon which the justice assumed to act had never been introduced in evidence. It ■thus appears that the judgment was rendered upon facts not proven upon.the trial. It, therefore, follows that the'judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. ■ • I

Present: BeekMan, P. J., Gildersleevé and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. ■ ■'- •' ■ ¡
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 44A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0944
  doi:10.3000/19770944.CA2012.044.ita |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 44A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 55o anno16 febbraio 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0944

doi:10.3000/19770944.CA2012.044.ita

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 44A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

55o anno16 febbraio 2012

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2012/C 044A/01 | Rettifica dei bandi di concorso COM/AD/01/10 e COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 e COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 e COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 e COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 e COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 e COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 e COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 e COM/AD/16/10 (GU C 265 A del 30.9.2010) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2012/C 044A/01

Rettifica dei bandi di concorso COM/AD/01/10 e COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 e COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 e COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 e COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 e COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 e COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 e COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 e COM/AD/16/10 (GU C 265 A del 30.9.2010)

(GU C 265 A del 30.9.2010)

1

CRONISTORIA DELLE GU C A CONCORSI

Si riporta qui di seguito l'elenco delle GU C A pubblicate nell'anno in corso.

Salvo indicazione contraria, le GU sono pubblicate in tutte le versioni linguistiche.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 16.2.2012 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | CA 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2012

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

CA 44/1

---

Rettifica dei bandi di concorso COM/AD/01/10 e COM/AD/02/10, COM/AD/03/10 e COM/AD/04/10, COM/AD/05/10 e COM/AD/06/10, COM/AD/07/10 e COM/AD/08/10, COM/AD/09/10 e COM/AD/10/10, COM/AD/11/10 e COM/AD/12/10, COM/AD/13/10 e COM/AD/14/10, COM/AD/15/10 e COM/AD/16/10

(

  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 265 A del 30 settembre 2010
  )

(2012/C 44 A/01)

Nella sezione VI dei bandi di concorso (pagine 6, 19, 28, 36, 49, 58, 70, 82):

anziché:

«VI.   ELENCHI DI RISERVA

| 1. | Iscrizione negli elenchi di riserva |
| --- | --- |

1.

[...]

L'elenco di riserva sarà valido fino al 31 dicembre 2012.»,

leggi:

«VI.   ELENCHI DI RISERVA

| 2. | Iscrizione negli elenchi di riserva |
| --- | --- |

2.

[...]

L'elenco di riserva sarà valido fino al 31 dicembre 2014.»

---
Exhibit 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF SCHERER HEALTHCARE, INC.

1.

Medical Waste Systems, Inc.
d/b/a Bio Systems
380 Constance Drive
Warminster, Pennsylvania 18974
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.#22-28533782.

ASH Enterprises, Inc.
120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.# 58-17280293.

Biofor, Inc.
120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.# 58-21058184.

BioWaste Management Corp.
120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.# 11-28723895.

BioWaste Systems, Inc.
210 Sherwood Avenue
Farmingdale, New York 11735
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.# 58-18036136.

Scherer Laboratories, Inc.
120 Interstate North Parkway, S.E., Suite 305
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 933-1800

Subsidiary
I.D.# 75-0270890


---