alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Proclaiming Certain Lands as a Reservation for the Match-e-be-
nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan, aka, Gun Lake 
Tribe

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reservation Proclamation; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) published a document in the 
Federal Register of August 18, 2009, concerning the Assistant 
Secretary-Indian Affairs proclaiming approximately 147 acres as the 
Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indian Reservation. The 
document contained an error in the legal description.

DATES: Effective Date: August 28, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 
Division of Real Estate Services, MS-4639 MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202) 208-7737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of August 18, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-19751, on 
page 41741, in the first column, line one, insert the following text 
after the word ``section,'' and before the word ``said:''

which is North 86 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds East 481.98 feet from 
the West line of said Section

    Also on page 41741, in the first column, line 33, change ``East 
431.00 feet;'' to the following and delete lines 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38 
in their entirety:

East 325.00 feet.

    Dated: August 21, 2009.
George T. Skibine,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E9-20791 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
#### § 589.208 Prohibited importation of goods, services, or technology from the Crimea region of Ukraine.

Except as otherwise authorized, the importation into the United States, directly or indirectly, of any goods, services, or technology from the Crimea region of Ukraine is prohibited.
MAINTENANCE OF AN OVERHANGING CORNICE ENJOINED.

Court of Appeals for Shelby County.

#### Henry F. Young et al v. Ignatius Henry Thedieck.

Decided, February 13, 1918.

*Overhanging Cornice*— Party *Wall*— Easement—Mandatory *Injunction Against Maintenance of Cornice*— Property *Bights Above the Same as Those on the Surface.*

1. The construction and maintenance by one lot owner, of a cornice extending beyond the party wall over the lot of an adjoining proprietor without his acquiescence or consent is a violation of the latter’s property rights.

2. The establishment of a party wall does not by implication give one proprietor the right to extend his structure over the adjoining lot.

3. The fact that the overhanging cornice is constructed above the present building on the adjoining lot and does not affect the present use thereof is no defense.

4. Mandatory injunction is an appropriate remedy to enforce the property rights so violated.

*D. F. Mills,*for plaintiff.

*Hess & Hess,*contra.

*240Allread, J.

This action was brought to obtain a mandatory injunction to compel the removal of .an overhanging cornice.

' The pleadings and agreed statement of facts show that in the construction of a four-story building, the defendant extended the cornice some two or three feet over the premises of plaintiff. It appears that the cornice is above the plaintiff’s building and does not interfere with the present use of the plaintiff’s property.

There is a party wall between the buildings of the respective parties which has been extended upward to accommodate and form part of the defendant’s structure.

The question involved is as to the defendant’s right to maintain the overhanging cornice.

We are of opinion that the defendant’s easement in the party wall does not extend beyond the wall itself, and that the construction and maintenance of the cornice extending over plaintiff’s premises is a violation of his property rights. *Harrington*v. *McCarthy,*169 Mass., 492; *Nash*v. *Kemp,*49 Howard Pr., 523, 12 Hun., 592; *Marion*v. *Johnson,*23 La. Ann., 593.

We have examined the cases cited by counsel-for defendant involving windows, chimneys and upward extensions of party walls. In none of those cases do we find any overhanging structures extending beyond the partition wall. We think all the cases may be distinguished upon that ground.

We are also of the opinion that the fact that the cornice does not now interfere with plaintiff’s use of their property does not affect the question. The plaintiff’s property right extends upward indefinitely and those rights may be enforced against invasion to the same extent as surface rights.

A mandatory injunction will, therefore, be issued requiring the defendant to remove the cornice and overhanging structure within six months .and defendant will be required to pay costs..

Decree accordingly.

Kunkle, J., and Ferneding, J., concur.
www.gpo.gov

#### Chapter Referred to in Other Sections

This chapter is referred to in sections 48, 49, 171, 351, 355, 505, 529, 530, 541e, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1256, 1292, 1721, 1721a of this title; title 10 section 7439; title 16 sections 90c–1, 460q–5, 460v–4, 460dd–2, 460*ll*–3, 460mm–1, 460uu–46, 544*l*, 3148, 3149, 3183; title 25 sections 398e, 459c, 459d, 640d–10; title 43 sections 299, 315f, 1608, 1633, 1714, 1747.
# Ecuador

128 items

        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Ecuador	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ecuador	  March 11, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Ecuador (20-211) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions	  February 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Ecuador	  July 11, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Ecuador (19-628) – Extension to Annex I of Agreement of September 26, 1986, as modified	  June 28, 2019 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S. Diplomatic Note Extending Annex I to US-Ecuador Air Transport Agreement Until June 30, 2021	  June 28, 2019 
        -    Report  		Ecuador	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Ecuador	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Ecuador	  April 23, 2019 
        -    Report  		Ecuador	  March 13, 2019 

previous page1…910111213next page

Back to Top
# Belarus

140 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Belarus	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 25, 2023	  Matthew MillerMay 25, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – May 23, 2023	  Matthew MillerMay 23, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Over 1,500 Political Prisoners in Belarus	  May 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Belarus	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Ambassador Michael R. Carpenter, U.S. Permanent Representative to the OSCE	  May 11, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2023	  March 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Belarus Freedom Day	  Vedant PatelMarch 25, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Additional Actions to Hold the Lukashenka Regime to Account	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 24, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Invocation of the OSCE Moscow Mechanism to Examine Reports of Human Rights Abuses Committed by Lukashenka Regime	  Vedant PatelMarch 23, 2023 

previous page123456…14next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.2






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cytogen  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Lawrence
R. Hoffman,  Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          materials  respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.





November 13, 2002                   /s/ Lawrence R. Hoffman
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Lawrence R. Hoffman
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2902

To suspend tariff reductions on winter tomatoes imported from Mexico until

the President certifies to the Congress that existing mechanisms are

sufficient to protect the domestic industry from import surges from

Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1996

Mr. GOSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend tariff reductions on winter tomatoes imported

from Mexico until the President certifies to the Congress

that existing mechanisms are sufficient to protect the

domestic industry from import surges from Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF TARIFF REDUCTIONS ON TO4 MATOES.

5 The President shall, unless and until the certification

6 is made under section 2—

7 (1) suspend tariff reductions under the North

8 American Free Trade Agreement on fresh or chilled
2

•HR 2902 IH

1 tomatoes provided for under subheading 0702.00.60

2 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

3 States that are products of Mexico; and

4 (2) impose on tomatoes described in paragraph

5 (1) the rate of duty that was in effect for such to6 matoes on December 31, 1993.

7 SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION.

8 (a) CERTIFICATION.—Section 1 shall cease to apply

9 if the President certifies to the Congress that the safe10 guard provided for in article 703 of the North American

11 Free Trade Agreement, the monitoring required by section

12 316 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Imple13 mentation Act, and the provisions for relief of domestic

14 industry under subtitle A of title III of that Act, and title

15 II of the Trade Act of 1974, are enforceable and effective

16 mechanisms to protect domestic producers of fresh or

17 chilled tomatoes from surges in imports from Mexico of

18 tomatoes described in section 1(1).

19 (b) EFFECT OF CERTIFICATION.—If a certification is

20 made under subsection (a), the rate of duty on tomatoes

21 described in section 1(1) shall be the rate of duty that

22 would apply under the North American Free Trade Agree23 ment but for section 1.
3

•HR 2902 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 Section 1 applies to goods entered, or withdrawn

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# Finland

170 items

        -    Report  		Finland	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Finland	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Finland	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Finland	  April 24, 2019 
        -    Report  		Finland	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Enhanced Partnership in Northern Europe (E-PINE)	   
        -    Report  		Finland	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Finland	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Finland	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Finland	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…1314151617next page

Back to Top
§ 583.502 Effect of license or other authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by OFAC, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of such license or other authorization, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license is issued by OFAC and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any other part of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license specifically refers to such part.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license authorizing any transaction prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property that would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
( d ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to supersede the requirements established under any other provision of law or to relieve a person from any requirement to obtain a license or other authorization from another department or agency of the U.S. government in compliance with applicable laws and regulations subject to the jurisdiction of that department or agency. For example, exports of goods, services, or technical data that are not prohibited by this part or that do not require a license by OFAC nevertheless may require authorization by the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of State, or other agencies of the U.S. government.
( e ) No license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
( f ) Any payment relating to a transaction authorized in or pursuant to this part that is routed through the U.S. financial system should reference the relevant OFAC general or specific license authorizing the payment to avoid the blocking or rejection of the transfer.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Initial Review Group; Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: October 13-14, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Road, NW., Washington, DC.
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2019, Rockville, MD 
20852. 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b8b2a7a1babdb293beb2babffdbdbabbfdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b505a4f4952555a7b565a525715555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS).

    Dated: August 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20862 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Birch Creek
National Wild River

River Corridor Map

Wild River Boundary

Boundaries
|/>| established by
ANILCA

O River Miles

[1 Milepost Miles

Scale 1:250000

o 1 2 3 4 5miles
= ss Ss

% s
of
a eenoet!
Y
#### § 800.212 Covered investment critical infrastructure.

The term *covered investment critical infrastructure* means, in the context of a particular covered investment, the systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, set forth in column 1 of appendix A to this part.
#### § 587.509 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 16, 2012

d0313 

# Order

March 16, 2012

144178(63)

SC: 144178 In re SAH, Minor. COA: 302809 Muskegon CC Family Division: 10-007638-AF

___________________ ________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s January 27, 2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### § 582.309 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
HomeIsrael

# Israel

906 items

        -    TIAS  		Israel (01-501.1) – Agreement Concerning Energy Cooperation	  May 1, 2001 
        -    TIAS  		Israel (13131) – Agreement for the Promotion of Aviation Safety	  December 19, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Israel (13025) – Agreement Regarding the Application of their Competition Laws	  November 7, 2000 
        -    TIAS  		Israel (12925) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  May 25, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Israel (12997) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Ballistic Missile Threats	  November 12, 1998 
        -    TIAS  		Israel (12930) – Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement	  February 10, 1998 

previous page1…899091

Back to Top
No. 98-1991.

#### Public Lands Council et al. *v.*Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 926J Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
#### U. S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ellen Tooley SWANN.

No. 82-C-1143.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re Ellen Tooley Swann, applying for writ of certiorari. St. Tammany Parish. No. 56126.

Granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0569

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZACARIAS WAYNE RAGSDALE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0569
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MERISEL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000724941                       
<NAME>                                         MERISEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.0000
<CASH>                                              24,780
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      193,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15,122
<INVENTORY>                                        472,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   694,370
<PP&E>                                             158,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                      70,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     807,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              541,107
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               803
<OTHER-SE>                                         133,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       807,244
<SALES>                                          1,255,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,255,197
<CGS>                                            1,190,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       76,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (20,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (20,509)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.26)
        


</TABLE>
#### John NEDELK v. Ian L. STIMSON, Richard J. Miller, and Graham Carrier, Appellees.

No. 00-1332.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2001.

Before GAJARSA and LINN, Circuit Judges, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

*885
      *Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

*This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:*

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36.