alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 281

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the tax on interest

received by foreigners on certain portfolio investments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate

the tax on interest received by foreigners on certain

portfolio investments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the

4 tax on interest received by foreigners on certain portfolio

5 investments.

6 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa7 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

8 That (a) the following provisions of the Internal Revenue

9 Code of 1986 are hereby repealed:
2

•HR 281 IH

1 (1) Section 871(h) (relating to repeal of tax on

2 interest of nonresident alien individuals received

3 from certain portfolio debt investments).

4 (2) Section 881(c) (relating to repeal of tax on

5 interest of foreign corporations received from certain

6 portfolio debt instruments).

7 (3) Section 1441(c)(9) (relating to exception for

8 interest income from certain portfolio debt invest9 ments).

10 (b)(1) Paragraph (1) of section 871(a) of such Code

11 is amended by striking ‘‘Except as provided in subsection

12 (h), there’’ and inserting ‘‘There’’.

13 (2) Subsection (a) of section 881 of such Code is

14 amended by striking ‘‘Except as provided in subsection

15 (c), there’’ and inserting ‘‘There’’.

16 (3) Paragraph (2) of section 864(c) of such Code is

17 amended by striking ‘‘section 871(a)(1), section 871(h),

18 section 881(a), or section 881(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘section

19 871(a)(1) or 881(a)’’.

20 (4) Subsection (b) of section 2105 of such Code is

21 amended—

22 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

23 (1),

24 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

25 (2) and inserting a period,
3

•HR 281 IH

1 (C) by striking paragraph (3), and

2 (D) by striking ‘‘AND CERTAIN OTHER DEBT

3 OBLIGATIONS’’ in the subsection heading.

4 (5) The last sentence of section 1442(a) of such Code

5 is amended by striking ‘‘, the references in section

6 1441(c)(9) to sections 871(h) and 871(h)(3) shall be

7 treated as referring to sections 881(c) and 881(c)(3)’’.

8 (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply

9 to interest received after the date of the enactment of this

10 Act with respect to obligations issued after such date.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129445(135) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129445 COA: 244245 Wayne CC: 02-001674 PONCIETTA ADRIENNE EARLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of February 27, 2006 is considere d, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
----

----

|   | (1) |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2066]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 18 / Thursday, January 29, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 5097]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2009-13 of January 16, 
                2009

                
 Eligibility of the Southern African Development 
                Community to Receive Defense Articles and Defense 
                Services under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 
                Amended, and the Arms Export Control Act, as Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 503(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                of 1961, as amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms 
                Export Control Act, as amended, I hereby find that the 
                furnishing of defense articles and defense services to 
                the Southern African Development Community will 
                strengthen the security of the United States and 
                promote world peace.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 16, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-2066
Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7588

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. AMELIA TURNER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Big Stone Gap

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr
- 00003

- JPJ

- 1 )

Submitted : March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Amelia Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Amelia Turner appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion for a sentence reduc tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Turner , No. 2:09

- cr
- 00003

- JPJ

- 1 (W.D. Va. July 23, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 584.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 584.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States with respect to property held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201(a).
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                     |
| Dated: March 1, 2018                                           |
|                                                                |
| /s/ Venugopal Rathi                                                 |
| Venugopal RathiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
#### § 536.511 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.

[86 FR 26667, May 17, 2021]
#### Elizabeth K. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Sci-med Waste Systems; Richard Henk; Richard Shively; Sidney Allen Conner, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-2273.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.

Decided Feb. 13, 2001.

Elizabeth K. Gray, pro se. Jeffery Scott Sexton, Gentry Locke Rakes *&*Moore, Roanoke, VA; Joseph Dudley McCluskey, Laura Graham Fox, Susan Childers North, Charles Garrison Meyer, III, Leclair Ryan, P.C., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth K. Gray appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the Defendants on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the jury’s verdict. *Gray v. Virginia Healthcare Waste Mgmt.,*No. CA-99-499-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 30, 1999). Gray’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 407.9 Soliciting, vending, debt collection, and distribution of handbills.

The unauthorized soliciting of alms and contributions, the commercial soliciting and vending of all kinds, the display or distribution of commercial advertising, or the collecting of private debts, in or on the property is prohibited. This prohibition does not apply to Department of Treasury concessions or notices posted by authorized employees on the bulletin boards. Distribution of material such as pamphlets, handbills, and flyers is prohibited without prior approval from the Assistant Secretary for Administration, or his delegate.
#### § 548.308 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support* means any property, tangible or intangible, including currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this section means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Turkmenistan Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Turkmenistan Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges:**INL programming is limited to three areas that have the support of the host government: forensics, English language training for law enforcement, and countering trafficking in persons.

**Goals:**INL programs enhance capacity of Turkmen law enforcement through forensics training and language training, and provide technical assistance to combat transnational crimes such as trafficking in persons.

**Accomplishments:**The forensics program continues to work with the State Forensic Service staff to bring certain forensics disciplines to international standards with the goal of international accreditation. In these efforts, the program has focused on improving handwriting analysis, technical documentation, and handling of narcotic drugs and chemicals. 

Tags

Turkmenistan

Back to Top
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00932-CV

Style: Beverly Scott

v Houston Funeral Directors Agent, Inc. d/b/a Kirk Mortuary Service of Houston, Craig 

Cordola (CEO of Memorial Hermann Hospital), Mainland Medical Center, Sozo 

Papasozomenos, M.D., Ramesh and Kirit Patel d/b/a Super 8 Motel, and Memorial 

Hermann Hospital

Dates motions filed*: December 2, 2013

Type of motions:

Motion to withdraw Dr. Robin Lynn Armstrong from appeal; Motion to extend deadline for 

filing reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Appellant 

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant moves for an extension of time “for the Reporters Records to be filed” and “to withdraw Dr.

Robin Lynn Armstrong from case number 01-13-00932-CV due to Dr. Robin Lynn Armstrong is still 

pending in the civil case 2012-33615.” On December 4, 2013, the court reporter informed us that there is

no reporter’s record in this appeal. Further, this is an appeal from trial court cause 2012-33615A, which

was severed from trial court cause 2012-33615. No claims involving Dr. Robin Lynn Armstrong were

included in the severance order, and Dr. Armstrong is therefore not a party to this appeal. Accordingly,

we dismiss appellant’s motions as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Michael Massengale

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: February 18, 2014
§ 587.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 587.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note 1 to § 587.504 .
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 587.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
§ 16.14 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the authority who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case— ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the ALJ;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the authority head, except as a witness or a representative in public proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The ALJ shall not be responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government may be an attorney employed anywhere in the Legal Division of the Department, or an attorney employed in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official; however the representative of the Government may not participate or advise in the review of the initial decision by the authority head.
No. 76-1461.

#### Ware *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.18 Is the determination of the Secretary on rates and values final?

The Secretary's determination of fixed rates of return, semiannual inflation rates, composite rates, and savings bonds redemption values is final and conclusive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,723
<SECURITIES>                                    20,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,947
<PP&E>                                          17,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,358
<SALES>                                         19,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,749
<CGS>                                            8,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)
        

</TABLE>
HomeBureau of International Organization Affairs...Bureau of International Organization Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of International Organization Affairs Releases

167 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with United Nations Secretary-General Guterres	  January 16, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 16, 2024World Economic ForumDavos, Switzerland 
        -    Media Note  		Renewal of the Charter for the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services	  January 12, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Advancing Global Norms for Higher Airspace Operations	  Matthew MillerDecember 18, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Taiwan Working Group Meeting on International Organizations	  December 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Ghana	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Election of Professor Sarah H. Cleveland to the International Court of Justice	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 9, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to the United Nations	  Matthew MillerOctober 23, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Addressing Racism, Xenophobia, Discrimination and Intolerance	  Aaron KeyakOctober 5, 2023Warsaw Human Dimension Conference Plenary SessionWarsaw, Poland 
        -    Press Statement  		Welcoming Amy E. Pope as Director General of the International Organization for Migration	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 2, 2023 

previous page1234…17next page

Back to Top
Opinion issued July 1 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 20 - 00632 - CV

——————————— TONY LONG AND / OR ALL OCCUPANTS OF 426 W. SUNNYSIDE ST. , Appella nt s V. QUALITY PROPERTY SOLUTIONS, LLC , Appell e e
On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1156993
MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant s , Tony Long and/or All Occupants of 426 W. Sunnyside St., have failed to timely file a brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P
.2

42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case) . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss.