alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005163EN.01000401.xml

| 5.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 July 2005

(2005/C 163/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1894 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67645 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4740 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5484 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,18 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8815 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9560 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,013 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0168 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6009 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,45 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,310 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6008 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5876 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4784 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2462 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7536 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0149 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 235,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1584 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8441 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 733,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,521 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,815 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,296 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1894

JPY

Japanese yen

132,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67645

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4740

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5484

ISK

Iceland króna

78,18

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8815

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9560

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

30,013

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0168

RON

Romanian leu

3,6009

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,45

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,310

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6008

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5876

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4784

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2462

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7536

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0149

KRW

South Korean won

1 235,97

ZAR

South African rand

8,1584

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8441

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 733,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,521

PHP

Philippine peso

66,815

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2790

THB

Thai baht

49,296

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866/13563 -- Protection 

of Stratospheric Ozone : Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling 

HCFC Production, Import, and Export

Frey, Nathan J. to: Luke Hall-Jordan 12/14/2011 05:54 PM

Cc: JohnB Chamberlin, Nicole Owens

History: This message has been forwarded.

We have concluded our review under EO 12866/13563 of the proposed rule RIN 

2060-AQ98 entitled, Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the 

Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2012. 

Thanks for all you work on this.
#### § 597.304 Designation.

The term *designation* includes both the designation and redesignation of a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1189.
Slip Op. 23Ȭ105

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

CHINA MANUFACTURERS

ALLIANCE, LLC and DOUBLE COIN

HOLDINGS LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge

Consol. Court No. 15Ȭ00124

JUDGMENT

Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand (June 14, 2023), ECF No. 272 (the “Remand Redetermination”) submitted to the

court by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“the

Department”) in response to the court’s Opinion and Order in China Manufacturers

Alliance, LLC v. United States, No. 23Ȭ75, 2023 WL 3479423 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 16, 2023)

(“CMA V”).

The court determines that the Remand Redetermination complies with the

court’s decisions in CMA V that plaintiffs China Manufacturers Alliance, LLC and

Double Coin Holdings Ltd. (collectively, “Double Coin”) did not rebut the

Department’s presumption of control by the Government of China over export activities

and that Double Coin, consequently, must be assigned the PRCȬwide rate of 105.31%.
Consol. Court No. 15Ȭ00124ȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱPage 2

No party filed comments in opposition to the Remand Redetermination within

the 30Ȭday period provided for in USCIT Rule 56.2(h).

Upon consideration of the Remand Redetermination and all other papers and

proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department’s finding in the Remand Redetermination that

Double Coin did not rebut the presumption of government control be, and hereby is,

sustained; it is further

ORDERED that the Department’s assignment of the PRCȬwide rate of 105.31% to

Double Coin be, and hereby is, sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that entries affected by this litigation shall be liquidated in

accordance with the final judicial decision in this action.

/s/ Timothy C. Stanceuȱȱ

ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge

Dated: July 19, 2023

ȱ ȱNew York, New York
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
HomeHungary

# Hungary

93 items

        -    Press Statement  		NATO Accession Anniversary for Czechia, Hungary, and Poland	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 5, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerFebruary 26, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Budapest, Hungary: American International School of Budapest: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 5, 2024	  Vedant PatelFebruary 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Concern with Hungary’s Sovereign Defense Authority Law	  Matthew MillerDecember 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Joins Multinational Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy Capacity by 2050 to Support Global Climate and Energy Security Goals	  December 2, 2023 
        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Budapest, Hungary: American International School of Budapest: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Hungary’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 20, 2023 

123…10next page

Back to Top
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DENNIS COX

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3843

[ April 30 , 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 05017017CFB

.

Dennis Cox, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeBureau of International Organization Affairs...Bureau of International Organization Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of International Organization Affairs Releases

169 items

        -    Video Remarks  		UN Human Rights Council Statement	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 2, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		52nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  Ned PriceFebruary 27, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		Statement by Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto World Health Organization (WHO) Fourth Meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB)	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with UN Secretary-General Guterres	  February 24, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with UN Secretary-General Guterres	  February 14, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Seattle, Washington	  February 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Launch of the Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils (VACS) with a Keynote Address from Special Envoy Fowler and Introduction by Ambassador McCain	  January 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Algeria and Morocco	  January 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to New York	  January 11, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to the United Nations in New York	  December 7, 2022 

previous page1…34567…17next page

Back to Top
ACCEPTED 01-14-00872-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/3/2015 2:42:00 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
#### David HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-949.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 24, 1979.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Sara Bresky Blumberg, West Palm Beach, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Glenn H. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting:

I believe the disposition of this appeal is governed by the decision in *Brown v. State,*376 So.2d 382 (Fla. Supreme Court case No. 73,782, opinion filed June 14, 1979) and accordingly the case should be remanded to the trial court with directions that appellant be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere.
PUBLIC LAW 106–459—NOV. 7, 2000 114 STAT. 1987

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1211:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–814 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–175 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 146 (2000): Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–459

106th Congress

An Act

To amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize additional

measures to carry out the control of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a

cost-effective manner.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY

CONTROL ACT.

Section 208(c) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control

Act (43 U.S.C. 1598(c)) is amended—

(1) in the first sentence—

(A) by striking ‘‘$75,000,000 for subsection 202(a)’’ and

inserting ‘‘$175,000,000 for section 202(a)’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘paragraph 202(a)(6)’’ and inserting

‘‘paragraph (6) of section 202(a)’’; and

(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘paragraph 202(a)(6)’’

and inserting ‘‘section 202(a)(6)’’.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

The Secretary of the Interior shall prepare a report on the

status of implementation of the comprehensive program for minimizing salt contributions to the Colorado River from lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management directed by section

203(b)(3) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (43

U.S.C. 1593). The report shall provide specific information on individual projects and funding allocation. The report shall be transmitted to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of

the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives no later than June 30, 2000.

Approved November 7, 2000.

Deadline.

Nov. 7, 2000

[S. 1211]
www.gpo.gov

### §169. Employees with religious convictions; payment of dues and fees

Any employee who is a member of and adheres to established and traditional tenets or teachings of a bona fide religion, body, or sect which has historically held conscientious objections to joining or financially supporting labor organizations shall not be required to join or financially support any labor organization as a condition of employment; except that such employee may be required in a contract between such employees’ employer and a labor organization in lieu of periodic dues and initiation fees, to pay sums equal to such dues and initiation fees to a nonreligious, nonlabor organization charitable fund exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of title 26, chosen by such employee from a list of at least three such funds, designated in such contract or if the contract fails to designate such funds, then to any such fund chosen by the employee. If such employee who holds conscientious objections pursuant to this section requests the labor organization to use the grievance-arbitration procedure on the employee's behalf, the labor organization is authorized to charge the employee for the reasonable cost of using such procedure.

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §19, as added Pub. L. 93–360, §3, July 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 397; amended Pub. L. 96–593, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3452.)

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–593 inserted reference to nonlabor organization and provisions respecting charges to employee for use of grievance-arbitration procedure, and struck out applicability of provisions to employees of health care institutions only.

#### Effective Date

Section 4 of Pub. L. 93–360 provided that: “The amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and section 183 of this title and amending sections 152 and 158 of this title] shall become effective on the thirtieth day after its date of enactment [July 26, 1974].”
HomeAustralia

# Australia

276 items

        -    TIAS  		Australia (05-901.1) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Collaboration on Tactile Missile Design, Development, Testing and Evaluation	  September 1, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (05-421.1) – Agreement Concerning Cooperative and Collaborative Research, Development, and Engineering Project Arrangement on the Australia/United States Phased Array Radar (AUSPAR) Project	  April 21, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (04-1118) – Memorandum of Understanding for the Cooperative Development, Production and Support of the Combat Control System AN/BYG-1 Tactical Subsystem	  November 18, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (13164) – Protocol Amending the Convention of August 6, 1982 for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income	  May 12, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (03-423) – Memorandum of Understanding for Test and Evaluation Program (TEP) Cooperation	  April 23, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (02-1212) – Agreement for the Enforcement of Maintenance Obligations	  December 12, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (02-1114) – Supplement Under the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Framework for System Development and Demonstration of the Joint Strike Fighter	  November 14, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (02-1107) – Agreement Concerning Security Measures for the Protection of Classified Information	  November 7, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (13169) – Agreement on Social Security	  October 1, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Australia (02-517) – Agreement Regarding Nuclear Energy	  May 17, 2002 

previous page1…25262728next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2000 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,878,332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,889,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                   411,642
<INVENTORY>                                 10,189,229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,397,189
<PP&E>                                      41,065,921
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,764,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,672,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,666,233
<BONDS>                                      7,521,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       493,362
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,247,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,672,546
<SALES>                                     26,777,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,777,418
<CGS>                                       15,883,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,883,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             546,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,526,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (803,930)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            515,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   515,822
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
#### The Sidney B. Bowman Cycle Co., Respondent, *v.*Elisha Dyer, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order granting a bill of particulars.

Dos Passos Bros. *&*Mitchell, for appellants.

Greene & Johnson, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The affidavit upon which the order herein was granted shows that Mr. Bowman, the plaintiff’s president, made the lease and had personal knowledge of all the dealings between plaintiff and defendants, and that as such officer he had no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief concerning the matters set forth in defendants’ answer, and upon which they based their alleged counterclaim, and that it was necessary for him to have a bill of particulars of such counterclaim before he could frame his reply to said counterclaim. In our judgment, such affidavit was sufficient and entitled plaintiff to the order appealed from.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Eitzsimohs, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J.

Order affirmed, with costs.
#### § 584.704 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to OFAC, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a Federal district court.
#### § 801.504 Agency notice of pilot program covered transactions.

Any member of the Committee, or his designee at or above the Under Secretary or equivalent level, may file an agency notice to the Committee through the Staff Chairperson regarding a pilot program covered transaction for which no declaration has been submitted pursuant to § 801.401 and no written notice has been filed under § 801.501(a) if that member has reason to believe that the transaction is a pilot program covered transaction and may raise national security considerations. Notices filed under this paragraph are deemed accepted upon their receipt by the Staff Chairperson.
#### § 562.311 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 18, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301

West Main Street in Benton, Illinois, as the ‘‘James

L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2689 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Courthouse located at 301 West

3 Main Street in Benton, Illinois, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Court5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18

(legislative day, December 15), 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.