alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Project Home
- U.S. ECS
- About the Project
- About ECS
- Data Collection
- International Cooperation
- FAQ
- Downloads

HomeU.S. Extended Continental Shelf Project

# U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Project

## U.S. ECS Announcement

The United States released the geographic coordinates defining the outer limits of the continental shelf of the United States in areas beyond 200 nautical miles from the coast.  The portion of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the coast is known as the “extended continental shelf,” or ECS. 

For more information, including maps and other resources, **see the U.S. ECS section of the website**. 

Read more about the Department of State’s announcement of the outer limits of the U.S. ECS: 

media note

FACT SHEET

U.S. ECS

## 							Key Topics						

              -  											U.S. ECS										 
              -  											About the Project  										 
              -  											About ECS										 
              -  											Data Collection										 
              -  											International Cooperation										 

### 											U.S. ECS											

													LEARN MORE ABOUT THE U.S. ECS													U.S. ECS

### 											About the Project  											

													LEARN MORE ABOUT THE PROJECT													About the Project  

### 											About ECS											

													LEARN MORE ABOUT THE ECS													About ECS

### 											Data Collection											

													LEARN MORE ABOUT DATA COLLECTION													Data Collection

### 											International Cooperation											

													LEARN MORE ABOUT INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION													International Cooperation

## Photos From the U.S. ECS

***Squat lobster, brittle star, hermit crab with anemone on its back, and Brisingid sea star******[Images courtesy of NOAA Ocean Exploration, Windows to the Deep 2021*]**

Back to Top
# The Bahamas

70 items

        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: The Bahamas	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Nichols’ Travel to The Bahamas	  June 7, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: The Bahamas	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: The Bahamas	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to The Bahamas and Germany	  February 13, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Bahamian Foreign Minister Frederick Mitchell Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 8, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bahamian Foreign Minister Mitchell	  November 8, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: The Bahamas	  September 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: The Bahamas	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: The Bahamas	  July 19, 2022 

previous page1234…7next page

Back to Top
About GAO | Contact GAO | E-mail Updates | Share/Save page

Advanced SearchSearch Only Legal Decisions

# 

        - Reports & Testimonies
        - Legal Decisions
        - Comptroller General
        - Topic Collections
        - Careers
        - FraudNet/Reporting Fraud
        - Multimedia

# Elections: 2007 Survey of State Voting System Programs  (GAO-08-1147SP, September 2008), an E-supplement to GAO-08-874  (updated in January 2009)
# Bureau of Counterterrorism Releases

620 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Tunisia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Trinidad and Tobago	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Venezuela	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Libya	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Qatar	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Lebanon	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Oman	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kuwait	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Jordan	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1…45678…62next page

Back to Top
§ 8.55 Contents of complaint. ( a ) *Charges.* A complaint will give a plain and concise description of the allegations which constitute the basis for the proceeding. A complaint will be deemed sufficient if it fairly informs the respondent of the charges to that he or she is able to prepare a defense.
( b ) *Demand for answer.* The complaint will give notification of the place and time prescribed for the filing of an answer by the respondent; that time will be not less than 15 days from the date of service of the complaint. Notice will be given that a decision by default may be rendered against the respondent if the complaint is not answered as required.
# C_2005162EN.01000101.xml

| 2.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 July 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 July 2005

(2005/C 162/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2087 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4866 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5519 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,76 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8810 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,990 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0233 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6030 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,45 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6163 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5960 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4867 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3929 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7526 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0415 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 246,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0775 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0038 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3045 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 815,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,594 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,482 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,923 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2087

JPY

Japanese yen

134,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67900

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4866

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5519

ISK

Iceland króna

78,76

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8810

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

29,990

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0233

RON

Romanian leu

3,6030

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,45

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,315

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6163

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5960

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4867

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3929

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7526

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0415

KRW

South Korean won

1 246,65

ZAR

South African rand

8,0775

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0038

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3045

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 815,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,594

PHP

Philippine peso

67,482

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6300

THB

Thai baht

49,923

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
H. R. 2869

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project

in the State of Kentucky.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION

DEADLINE FOR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT IN

KENTUCKY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Project No. 6641, the Commission shall, at the request of the

licensee for the project, in accordance with the good faith, due

diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the

Commission’s procedures under that section, extend until June

15, 1998, the time period during which the licensee is required

to commence construction of the project.

(b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect on the

expiration of the extension, issued by the Commission under section

13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required

for commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a).

(c) REINSTATMENT OF LICENSE.—The Commission is authorized

to reinstate the license for the project referred to in subsection

(a), effective as of the date of its expiration or termination.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.3
 EXHIBIT A-1 FOR PERFORMANCE PERIOD 2007
 MAXIMUM INCENTIVE PAYMENTS
 IncentivePaymentMaximum
    
    
    
    
    
    At MaximumParticipation
    
    Base
    
    ParticipationParticipant
    
    Rate
    
    Salary
    
    RateThomas W. Burghart
    
    
    50
    %
    
    $
    240,000
    
    
    $
    120,000Lawrence E. Daurelle
    
    
    110
    %
    
    
    350,000
    
    
    
    385,000
 DATA RELATING TO OTHER PARTICIPANTS DELETED
 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B FOR PERFORMANCE PERIOD 2007
 INCENTIVE BONUS CALCULATION
       2




---



##### 



EXHIBIT C FOR PERFORMANCE PERIOD 2007
 MEASURING OBJECTIVE
  3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT D FOR PERFORMANCE PERIOD 2007
 ACHIEVEMENT PERCENTAGE
   4
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129423 & (33) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129423 

 COA: 262341 

Wayne CC: 04-4500084

36th DC: 04-063371 

CARL JORDAN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

strike is also considered, and it is DENIED. 

s1208 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2005 

Clerk
#### Laura SPRINGER, a minor, by and through her father and next friend, Arthur Springer, and Arthur Springer, Individually, Appellants, v. Alba D. MANGEL and Carlos Mangel, Appellees.

No. 74-876.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
HomeColombia

# Colombia

307 items

        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Noe Suarez Rojas	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Jose Benito Cabrera Cuevas	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Luis Antonio Lozada	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Abelardo Caicedo Colorado	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Hermilo Cabrera Diaz	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Felix Antonio Munoz Lascarro	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Jorge Torres Victoria	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Henry Castellanos Garzon	  March 28, 2017 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Rodrigo Londono-Echeverry	  March 27, 2017 

previous page1…262728293031next page

Back to Top
#### Elayn HUNT, Director of Department of Corrections, Petitioner, v. STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Louis MATRANGA, Respondent.

No. 55111.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1974.

In re: State of Louisiana, Department of Corrections applying for Writs of Cer-tiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition.

Not considered. Does not comply with Rule 10 Section 5 of Our Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,436]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a worker petition filed on June 26, 2009 on behalf of workers of Fortis Plastics, LLC, Boonville, Mississippi.

The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid because it was filed by only one worker, not three as required by the statute. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of July 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-20462 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00465-CV

T. C., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-20-004884,

THE HONORABLE AURORA MARTINEZ-JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

T.C. (Mother) appeals from the trial court’s final decree terminating her parental 

rights to her children, Z.D. and D.D.

1 See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. Following a bench trial, 

the trial court found by clear and convincing evidence that statutory grounds for terminating her 

parental rights existed and that termination was in the children’s best interest. See id.

§ 161.001(b)(1)(O), (2).

On appeal, Mother’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that the 

appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); 

Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646–47 (Tex. App.—

Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental 

1 We refer to appellant by her initials or as Mother and to the children by their initials. 

See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8. 
2

rights). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See

386 U.S. at 744; Taylor, 160 S.W.3d at 646–47. Mother’s counsel has certified to this Court that 

he provided Mother with a copy of the Anders brief and informed her of her right to examine the

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. To date, Mother has not filed a pro se brief.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of the 

proceedings to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 

80 (1988). We have reviewed the entire record, including the Anders brief submitted on 

Mother’s behalf, and have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. We agree that 

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s final decree

terminating Mother’s parental rights.2

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: January 12, 2022

2 We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney of record. See In re P.M., 

520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam). If Mother, after consulting with counsel, desires to 

file a petition for review, counsel should timely file with the Texas Supreme Court “a petition for 

review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief.” See id. at 27–28.
HomeEstonia

# Estonia

101 items

        -    TIAS  		Estonia (17-706.1) – Defense Cooperation Agreement	  July 6, 2017 
        -    Report  		Estonia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Estonia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Estonia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (16-923) – Defense Procurement Agreement	  September 23, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (16-622) – Defense Agreement for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Projects	  June 22, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (15-609) – Agreement Regarding Defense Cooperation	  June 9, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (14-709) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 9, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (11-225) – Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation on Oil Shale Research and Utilization	  February 25, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Estonia (10-201.30) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2010 

previous page1…7891011next page

Back to Top
#### Saul v. Saul et al.

(No. 2)

*John Patrick Walsh,*for plaintiff.

*James' Conwell Welsh,*for defendants.

November 17, 1954.

Reimel, J.,

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s motions to strike *489off new matter in the answers filed by defendants to the amended complaint in equity. The new matter is that “Plaintiff has at various times, with various persons, at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Brigantine, New Jersey, and other places, from approximately the autumn of 1945, until as recently as September 13, 1953, while yet the wife of defendant, Richard F. Saul, committed adultery”.

This is an action in equity for an injunction and incidental relief on the ground that defendant, husband of plaintiff, and his father and stepmother have conspired to perpetrate certain frauds whereby plaintiff will be deprived of the security for the support order for herself and two children, as well as, of her prospective dower rights. The. other parties in the action are nominal;' they are not: accused of ány wrongdoing.

A preliminary injunction to restrain the sale of one of the properties involved in the action has _ been granted and is still in force.

The support order was entered by Municipal Court of Philadelphia against defendant, Richard F. Saul, on December 20, 1951. The original order then entered, although reduced, has since been reinstated by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. The new matter alleged by defendants, which is identical in each case, cannot defeat this action to enjoin the transfer, encumbrance or dissipation by defendants of Richard F. Saul’s property. Moreover, the adultery by wife plaintiff cannot defeat her dower right when she has not deserted her husband: 17 Am. Jur. 740, §86. The record of the order for support entered by the municipal court negates desertion on her part as the proceeding under the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 72, sec. 733, 18 PS §4733, is an action for desertion and nonsupport. See Crater Estate, -372 Pa. 458, 461.

*490The new matter alleged in each answer is irrelevant and immaterial and is scandalous and impertinent.

*Order*

And now, to wit, November 17, 1954, plaintiff’s motions to strike off new matter in each of the answers filed are granted.

And it appearing that the new matter averred in each of the answers of defendants filed of record is scandalous and impertinent it is ordered that the new matter filed by each of defendants shall be stricken from the record.
§ 601.5 Penalty for Unauthorized Control or Possession. ( a ) Control or possession of distinctive paper and/or distinctive counterfeit deterrents adopted in §§ 601.3 and 601.4 require authorization by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) The penalty for unauthorized control and/or possession of distinctive paper and/or distinctive counterfeit deterrents adopted in §§ 601.3 and 601.4 is found at 18 U.S.C. 474A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725813
<NAME> JUDY ALLARD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                      11,099,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,536,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   475,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,750,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,310,000
<PP&E>                                      55,701,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,074,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,477,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,347,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       870,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,508,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,477,000
<SALES>                                     25,233,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,233,000
<CGS>                                       16,796,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,796,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,990,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (103,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,550,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,157,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,393,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,393,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>