alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMPENSATION FOR PROSECUTOR IN MUNICIPAL COURT.

Court of Appeals for Butler County.

#### State, ex rel Primmer, City Solicitor, v. Board of Commissioners of Butler County et al.*

Decided, November 27, 1914.

*Prosecution of Criminal Cases in the Municipal Court of*Hamilton— *Compensation Therefor.*

1. It is tlie duty of the city solicitor of Hamilton to act as the prosecuting attorney of the municipal court of that city.

2. It is the duty of the county commissioners to make a proper allowance to the city solicitor for his services in state cases before the Municipal Court of Hamilton.

*528
      *B. F. Primmer,*City Solicitor, for plaintiff in error.

*Benj. A. Bickley,*Prosecuting Attorney, contra.

Affirmed, *County Commissioners*v. *State, ex rel Primmer,*93 Ohio State, 42.

Jones (Oliver B.), J.

This is an action to compel the board of county commissioners to make an allowance of compensation to the city solicitor for his services as prosecuting attorney of the Municipal Court of Hamilton.

There is no question that the municipal court has the jurisdiction of a police or mayor’s court, and in our opinion Section 4306, General Code, and 'Section 1579-122, General Code (103 O. L., 353), make it the duty of the city solicitor of Hamilton to act as the prosecuting -attorney of such court, and_ under the terms of Section 4307, General Code, he “shall receive for this service such compensation as council may prescribe, and such additional compensation as the county commissioners shall allow.”

In our opinion it is the duty of the county commissioners by virtue of this section to make a proper allowance to the city solicitor for his services as prosecuting attorney in state cases before the Municipal Court of Hamilton. In making this allowance they can take into consideration the amount of compensation he receives for city cases, and the extent of the services rendered in both city and state cases.

The court below was, therefore, in error in sustaining the demurrer of defendants below to the, petition for mandamus, and the judgment will be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Swing, J., and Jones (E. H.), J., concur.
#### ED-JO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., Edward Cerrito, and Joan R. Cerrito, Appellants, v. Jacqueline R. KOVITCH, Appellee.

No. 80-847.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 8, 1980.

Timothy H. Kenney of Winkel, Sims, Kenney & Crosswell, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard W. Wasserman, Miami Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a non-final order striking a demand for a jury trial on a counterclaim for usury filed in response to appellee’s foreclosure complaint. The trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion to strike is not one of those non-final orders from which an interlocutory appeal is authorized by Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3). Moreover, certiorari jurisdiction has not been properly invoked since appellants have an adequate remedy on appeal from final judgment. That being so, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and BER-ANEK, JJ., concur.
VII

Private Calendar No. 5

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2765

[Report No. 104–547]

For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 12, 1995

Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 1, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.

4 As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall pay to Rocco

6 A. Trecosta, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a former teacher

7 in the Department of Defense Overseas Dependent
2

HR 2765 RH

1 Schools, back pay in the amount calculated pursuant to

2 section 2.

3 SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.

4 (a) INITIAL CALCULATION OF AMOUNT.—The Sec5 retary of Defense shall calculate the amount that Rocco

6 A. Trecosta would have been awarded had Mr. Trecosta

7 been a member of the plaintiff class in March v. United

8 States, 506 F.2d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

9 (b) GROSS AMOUNT.—The gross amount for pur10 poses of subsection (c) shall be the lesser of—

11 (1) the amount calculated pursuant to sub12 section (a); and

13 (2) $10,000.

14 (c) DEDUCTIONS FROM GROSS AMOUNT.—The Sec15 retary of Defense shall pay to Rocco A. Trecosta the gross

16 amount described in subsection (b) less appropriate

17 amounts for—

18 (1) Civil Service Retirement;

19 (2) Social Security;

20 (3) Federal Employees Group Life Insurance;

21 (4) Federal income tax withholding; and

22 (5) any other similar or related deductions.

23 SEC. 3. FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

24 The payment authorized by this Act shall be in full

25 satisfaction of all claims of Rocco A. Trecosta against the
3

HR 2765 RH

1 United States for back pay in connection with his service

2 as a teacher in the Department of Defense Overseas De3 pendent Schools.

4 SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON FEES.

5 No more than 10 percent of the payment authorized

6 by this Act shall be paid to or received by any agent or

7 attorney for services rendered in connection with obtaining

8 such payment, any contract to the contrary notwithstand9 ing. Any person who violates this section shall be fined

10 not more than $1,000.
Private Calendar No. 

5

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2765

[Report No. 104–547]

A BILL

For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta.

MAY 1, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CARTER D. MANSFIELD,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent

______________________ 

2015-3007

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. AT-0752-13-4111-I-1.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK, Joel J. Kirkpatrick, P.C., Plymouth, MI, argued for petitioner. 

MELISSA M. DEVINE, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### § 560.413 [Reserved]
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/2012

| | ISSN 1977-107X
  doi:10.3000/1977107X.C_2012.040.gle |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5511 Feabhra 2012 |

ISSN 1977-107X

doi:10.3000/1977107X.C_2012.040.gle

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5511 Feabhra 2012

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | Parlaimint na hEorpa |
| 2012/C /01 | Cinneadh | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Parlaimint na hEorpa

2012/C /01

Cinneadh

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 40 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 40 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Parlaimint na hEorpa

| 11.2.2012 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN/1

---

CINNEADH

2012/C 40/01

TÁ ARD-RÚNAÍ PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA,

Ag féachaint do Rialacháin Foirne Oifigigh an Aontais Eorpaigh agus Coinníollacha Fostaíochta Sheirbhísigh eile an Aontais Eorpaigh, atá leagtha síos i Rialachán (CEE, Euratom, CECA) Uimh. 259/68 ón gComhairle, arna leasú go deireanach le Rialachán (CE, Euratom) Uimh. 723/2004 ón gComhairle agus go háirithe Airteagal 30 de na Rialacháin Foirne,

Ag féachaint don chinneadh ón mBiúró i ndáil leis an Údarás Ceapacháin a shocrú, arna leasú go deireanach an 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2004,

Ag féachaint d'Fhógra Chomórtas Oscailte:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S,

Ag féachaint don tuairim ón gComhchoiste arna heisiúint ag a chruinniú an 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2011,

TAR ÉIS A CHINNEADH:

Airteagal Aonair

Tá tréimhse bailíochta an phainéil do Chomórtais Oscailte:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

fadaithe go dtí an 31 Nollaig 2012.

Arna dhéanamh i Lucsamburg an 18 Nollaig 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Ard-Rúnaí

---
§ 515.591 Services related to infrastructure. Persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are authorized to provide to Cuba or Cuban nationals services related to developing, repairing, maintaining, and enhancing Cuban infrastructure that directly benefit the Cuban people, provided that those services are consistent with the export or reexport licensing policy of the Department of Commerce. For the purposes of this section, infrastructure means systems and assets used to provide the Cuban people with goods and services produced or provided by the public transportation, water management, waste management, non-nuclear electricity generation, and electricity distribution sectors, as well as hospitals, public housing, and primary and secondary schools. This authorization includes projects related to the environmental protection of U.S., Cuban, and international air quality, waters, and coastlines. Note 1 to § 515.591 :
For provisions related to transactions ordinarily incident to the exportation or reexportation of items to Cuba, see §§ 515.533 and 515.559. See § 746.2(b) of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) for the Department of Commerce's Cuba licensing policy.
Note 2 to § 515.591 :
See § 515.564 for a general license authorizing travel-related and other transactions incident to professional research and professional meetings in Cuba, § 515.533(c) for a general license authorizing travel-related and other transactions relating to certain exports and reexports to Cuba, and § 515.575(a) for a general license authorizing transactions, including travel-related transactions, related to certain humanitarian projects.
[81 FR 71378, Oct. 17, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 60072, Sept. 24, 2020; 87 FR 35091, June 9, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2662 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2662

    To provide for the payment of Federal and District of Columbia 
 employees during periods of a lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 
                                 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 1995

 Mr. Wolf (for himself, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Davis, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Moran, 
 Mrs. Morella, and Mr. Wynn) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the payment of Federal and District of Columbia 
 employees during periods of a lapse in appropriations for fiscal year 
                                 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY FOR FEDERAL AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMPLOYEES DURING 
              LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1341 of title 31, United 
States Code, any officer or employee of the United States Government or 
of the District of Columbia government who is furloughed for any period 
as a result of a lapse in appropriations, or whose services are 
employed for any period during a lapse in appropriations, shall be 
compensated at the standard rate of compensation for such officer or 
employee for such period.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to any lapse in 
appropriations for fiscal year 1996 occurring after September 30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
BASTARDY PROCEEDINGS BY A MARRIED WOMAN.

Court of Appeals for Clark County.

#### State of Ohio, ex rel Mary Roden, v. Edward N. Cregar.

Decided, January 5, 1918.

■ *Bastardy*— Not *Maintainable Where the Child Was Born After Hie Marriage of the Mother*— Section 12110.

Bastardy proceedings can not be maintained' by a married woman, notwithstanding the child was begotten prior to her marriage by a man other than her husband.

*T. J.*McCormick, for plaintiff in error.

*Stafford & Arthur,*contra.

Kunkle, J.

This is a proceeding in bastardy which was originally brought before a justice of the peace under Section 12110, General Code.

This section provides:

> “When an unmarried woman, who has been delivered t>f or is pregnant with a bastard child, makes a complaint in writing, under oath, before a justice of the peace, charging a person with being the father of such child, he thereupon shall issue his warrant, directed to any sheriff or constable of the state, command*384ing him to pursue and arrest such accused person in any county therein, and bring him forthwith before such justice to answer such complaint.”

Without undertaking to quote in detail from the record, it is sufficient to say that the same discloses that the child in question was begotten September 26th, 1916; that Mary Roden, the complainant, was married February 12, 1917; that the child in question was born June 13, 1917; that the complainant was, at the time of the birth'of the child, at the time the proceeding was instituted before the justice of the peace, .and still is, a married woman, being the wife of a man other than defendant in error.

Can this proceeding, under such a state of facts, be maintained? We have carefully considered the briefs which have been filed by counsel. ■ Without attempting to discuss the authorities so cited in detail, we are of opinion that under the reading of Section 12110, General Code, and under the Ohio decisions, such as 30 O. S., 627; 43 O. S., 478, etc., this action can not be m.aintained.

We are also of opinion that* the case cited by counsel for plaintiff in error in the 65 Nebraska Reports, p. 608, is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar.

A consideration of the Ohio cases, in our opinion, requires a holding to the effect that the action can not be maintained.

The judgment of the lower court will therefore be affirmed.

Allread, J., and Ferneding, J., concur.
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs...Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Releases

590 items

        -    Media Note  		Announcement of the 2024 Cohort of U.S. Science Envoys	  March 13, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate	  My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Other Release  		Job Posting: Executive Director, United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement, Secretariat for Environmental Enforcement Matters	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Finkenauer’s Travel to Australia and Thailand	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on U.S. Environmental Efforts on the African Continent	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnFebruary 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Peru Meet to Discuss Trade Promotion Agreement Environment Chapter and Environmental Cooperation Agreement Implementation	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy Kerry Travels to the United Kingdom	  February 25, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation Senior Officials Meeting	  February 20, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 17, 2024Bayerischer HofMunich, Germany 

previous page12345…59next page

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2743

To establish a source of funding for certain border infrastructure projects

necessary to accommodate increased traffic resulting from implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To establish a source of funding for certain border infrastructure projects necessary to accommodate increased

traffic resulting from implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Infrastructure

5 Improvements Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation

8 may make grants to States, cities, and counties for high-
2

•HR 2743 IH

1 way, railroad, bridge, and border crossing construction

2 projects—

3 (1) that are located in the United States in the

4 vicinity of the border between the United States and

5 Mexico and the border between the United States

6 and Canada; and

7 (2) that are necessary to accommodate in8 creased traffic resulting from implementation of the

9 North American Free Trade Agreement.

10 (b) SELECTION CRITERIA.—The Secretary shall se11 lect projects for grant assistance under this section on the

12 basis of the demonstrated need for assistance to accommo13 date increased traffic resulting from implementation of the

14 North American Free Trade Agreement.

15 (c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

16 of projects for which grants are made under this section

17 shall be 80 percent.

18 SEC. 3. GRANTS AS CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.

19 A grant approved by the Secretary under this section

20 shall be a contractual obligation of the United States to

21 pay the Federal share of the cost of the project.

22 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

23 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out

24 this Act for each fiscal year beginning after September

25 30, 1996, $400,000,000 from the Highway Trust Fund
3

•HR 2743 IH

1 (other than Mass Transit Account). Such sums shall re2 main available until expended. Funds authorized by this

3 section shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.

Æ
§ 501.738 Disqualification and withdrawal of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) *Notice of disqualification.* If at any time an Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee believes himself or herself to be disqualified from considering a matter, the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee, as appropriate, shall issue a notice stating that he or she is withdrawing from the matter and setting forth the reasons therefor.
( b ) *Motion for Withdrawal.* Any party who has a reasonable, good faith basis to believe an Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee has a personal bias, or is otherwise disqualified from hearing a case, may make a motion to the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee, as appropriate, that the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee withdraw. The motion shall be accompanied by a statement subject to 18 U.S.C. 1001 setting forth in detail the facts alleged to constitute grounds for disqualification. If the Administrative Law Judge or Secretary's designee finds himself or herself qualified, he or she shall so rule and shall continue to preside over the proceeding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1999
<CASH>                                           5,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,608
<INVENTORY>                                    131,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,169
<PP&E>                                         237,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,615
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,806
<SALES>                                        485,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,367
<CGS>                                          324,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,853
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09



</TABLE>