alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeEcuador

# Ecuador

128 items

        -    Media Note  		The Republic of Ecuador Signs the Artemis Accords	  June 22, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Ecuador	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: 	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Release of the 2023 Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction	  May 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Guiding Principles on Government Use of Surveillance Technologies	  March 30, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Ecuador	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Tab 1. Deputy Assistant Secretary Burkett’s Opening Remarks for the CMAR Action Plan Public Panel	  Maxine  BurkettMarch 3, 2023CMAR Action Plan Public Panel 
        -    TIAS  		Ecuador (22-1220) – Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences	  December 20, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to Mexico, Ecuador, and Costa Rica December 11-14	  December 11, 2022 
        -    		U.S. Statement: High-level Roundtable on Corruption	  November 28, 2022The Hague, The Netherlands 

previous page123456…13next page

Back to Top
#### Fred L. Lavanburg, Plaintiff, *v.*Isaac Pfeiffer, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

May, 1898.)

Trade-marks — Hostile use of initial adjectives qualifying colors.

On a motion for a preliminary injunction In an action, it appeared that, upon the dissolution of the partnership of the parties for the manufacture and sale of dry colors, the plaintiff bought the assets *578including, among other things, the trade- names “Oriole Vermilion” and “ Peerless Green.” and that the defendant, who had subsequently embarked in the same manufacture, was using the terms “ O. Vermilion” and “ P. Green.”

Held, that even assuming the plaintiff’s right to both adjectives,"he could not prevent the defendant from using the initials instead of the name, as such a use was not calculated to deceive the public, or at least, so muQh of it as used its eyes and ears.

Motion for a .preliminary injunction brought by plaintiff to restrain the defendant ■ from selling any dry -colors under the trade names “Oriole Vermilion” or “Peerless Green,” and from using the initials “ 0.” or “ P.” Plaintiff claimed that'he was the owner of said trade names; that defendant used'the terms “ 0. Vermilion ” and “P. Green,” and that in three or four instances his salesmen, made sales under the verbal description of “ Oriole ” and “ Peerless.” The moving affidavits are met by absolute'denials.

Spiegelberg & Wise, for plaintiff.

A. L. & S. F. Jacobs, for defendant.

Cohen, J.

The plaintiff and. the defendant were formerly co-partners, engaged .in the business of manufacturing and selling dry colors. The copartnership was dissolved December 24, 1896, and the plaintiff bought the assets of the business, including the trade names and marks, and since that time the plaintiff alone, and the defendant, either alone or associated with others, have continued in. the same kind of business. Among the trade names of the old firm were those of “Oriole Vermilion.” and “ Péerless Green-,” which names the plaintiff now seeks to enjoin the defendant from using. It nowhere appears from the affidavits that on any manufactured article the defendant had' used either of those names. It does appear that he has used “O. Vermilion” and “P. Green;” but even assuming the plaintiff’s right to both adjectives, he would riot be warranted in preventing the defendant from, using the initials instead of the name, as such a use is not calculated to deceive the public, or, at least, so much of it as use their eyes and ears.

It does .appear by affidavits, which are flatly contradicted, that products made by the defendant were sold in small quantities, and in three or four instances under the verbal description of “ Oriole ” or “Peerless.” Under such circumstances, it does not seem to me *579that the plaintiff has made out a case for a preliminary injunction. As the defendant has expressed his willingness to accept short notice of trial for the March Term, the plaintiff can have a speedy trial, where witnesses will be examined and cross-examined, and then obtain injunctive relief if he then he found entitled thereto.

Motion denied.
HomeGuinea-Bissau

# Guinea-Bissau

39 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing on Power of Democracy and the Future of Peacekeeping in Africa After the AU Financing Security Council Resolution	  January 31, 2024 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Guinea-Bissau	  October 24, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Guinea-Bissau National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 24, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Guinea-Bissau	  June 27, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Guinea-Bissau	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Guinea-Bissau	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Guinea-Bissau	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Guinea-Bissau National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 24, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Guinea-Bissau	  August 18, 2022 

1234next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                   2,337,590
<RECEIVABLES>                                        119
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,462,173
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,462,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             28,129
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,434,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,462,173
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 474,912
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (405,820)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   69,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      69,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000725261      
<NAME>                         DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                148,241
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          74,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      222,641
<PP&E>                             30,209,864
<DEPRECIATION>                     29,952,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        563,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  40,194
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            480,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          563,894
<SALES>                               225,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      228,186
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         136,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        91,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    91,640
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           91,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            16.5
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Noman Ahmed  Al-Hamili

# 				 Noman Ahmed  Al-Hamili			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				September 17, 2008			

**Yemeni Government image**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialYemen

Back to Top
#### § 589.325 Metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.

The term *metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy* includes any act, process, or industry of extracting, at the surface or underground, ores, coal, precious stones, or any other minerals or geological materials in the Russian Federation, or any act of procuring, processing, manufacturing, or refining such geological materials, or transporting them to, from, or within the Russian Federation.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Spain, the United Kingdom, and Belgium

# 									Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Spain, the United Kingdom, and Belgium							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 19, 2024

U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Dr. Geeta Rao Gupta will travel to Madrid, Spain; London, United Kingdom; and Brussels, Belgium January 20-27.  The Ambassador will engage in bilateral meetings with government counterparts in all three countries to discuss our shared efforts to promote the rights and empowerment of women and girls in the region and across the globe.

On January 22 in Madrid, the Ambassador will join a conversation on the importance of women’s participation in public life at the Global Women Leader Voices (GWL Voices) inaugural Dialogue event.

From January 23-25 in London, Ambassador Rao Gupta will engage with high-level UK government officials and consult with British civil society organizations on a variety of gender-related issues, including gender-based violence and particularly conflict-related sexual violence.

On January 26 in Brussels, Ambassador Rao Gupta will participate in a NATO meeting on Women, Peace and Security (WPS), where she will engage with counterparts from NATO member countries on the advancement of the WPS agenda.

For media inquiries, please contact stategwi@state.gov.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCivil SocietyGender-based ViolenceGlobal Women's IssuesNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of Global Women’s IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonSpainTravelUnited KingdomWomen's IssuesWomen's RightsWomen’s Economic Empowerment

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 558.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the South Sudan-related sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac.*
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Randolph SCOTT.

No. 64739.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 24, 1979.

In re Randolph Scott applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition and for a stay order. Parish of Calcasieu. No. 60011.

Denied. Defendant’s right to appeal from the ruling of the trial judge have been reserved.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6442

STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER TAYLOR, Correctional Officer at

Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in

individual and official capacity; OFFICER

STAPLETON, Correctional Officer at Foothills

Correctional Institution, sued in individual

and official capacity; OFFICER HOUSTON,

Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional

Institution, sued individual and official

capacity; OFFICER FISHER, Correctional Officer

at Foothills Correctional Institution, sued in

individual and official capacity; OFFICER

ROLAND, Correctional Officer at Foothills

Correctional Institution, sued in individual

and official capacity; OFFICER PATTERSON,

Correctional Officer at Foothills Correctional

Institution sued, in individual and official

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00229)

Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 11, 2007 

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,

Senior Circuit Judge.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM: 

Stanley E. Corbett, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find that the undisputed facts do not

support an inference that the officers’ use of force was malicious

or wanton. Because we find as a matter of law that their conduct

does not satisfy the subjective requirement of an Eighth Amendment

violation, we do not reach the objective requirement. See

Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6-8 (1992). Accordingly, we

affirm the judgment of the district court for that reason. See

Corbett v. Taylor, No. 1:06-cv-00229 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2007). We

deny Corbett’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeDominican Republic

# Dominican Republic

104 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting With President Abinader and FM Álvarez of the Dominican Republic	  April 12, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting on Economic Development in the Dominican Republic	  April 12, 2023 
        -    		Travel to New Orleans, Santo Domingo, and Buenos Aires, April 10-14, 2023	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to New Orleans, Santo Domingo, and Buenos Aires	  April 10, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to the Dominican Republic	  March 24, 2023 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With the Dominican Republic	  March 21, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Dominican Republic	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Dominican Republic National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 27, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the United States-Dominican Republic High Level Dialogue on Institutional Reform	  Uzra ZeyaOctober 27, 2022Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to the Dominican Republic	  October 26, 2022 

previous page12345…11next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2625 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2625

 To prohibit future obligation of funds for the B-2 bomber procurement 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 1995

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit future obligation of funds for the B-2 bomber procurement 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR B-2 BOMBER 
              PROCUREMENT PROGRAM.

    No funds may be obligated after the date of the enactment of this 
Act for procurement of aircraft for the B-2 bomber program. Any amount 
appropriated before the date of the enactment of this Act for such 
purpose that remains available for obligation may not be obligated for 
any other purpose.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2898 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2898

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that aliens 
   removed from the United States as illegal entrants or immigration 
              violators shall permanently be inadmissible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1996

   Mr. Tate introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that aliens 
   removed from the United States as illegal entrants or immigration 
              violators shall permanently be inadmissible.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION TO GROUND OF INADMISSIBILITY FOR ILLEGAL ENTRANTS 
              AND IMMIGRATION VIOLATORS.

    (a) Aliens Previously Deported.--Section 212(a)(6)(A) (8 U.S.C. 
1182(a)(6)(A)) is amended by--
            (1) inserting after ``Any alien who'' the following: ``had 
        the intent to illegally enter the United States and''; and
            (2) striking ``and who again seeks admission within one 
        year of the date of such deportation''.
    (b) Certain Aliens Previously Removed.--Section 212(a)(6)(B) (8 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(B)) is amended by--
            (1) inserting after ``Any alien who'' the following: ``had 
        the intent to illegally enter the United States and''; and
            (2) striking ``and (a) who seeks admission within 5 years 
        of the date of such deportation or removal, or (b) seeks 
        admission within 20 years in the case of an alien convicted of 
        an aggravated felony,''.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SJON JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3184

[March 20, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20005656CF10A. 

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions and sentence for one count of felony 

battery and one count of resisting an officer without violence. We reverse 

appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing based on the state’s 

concession that appellant’s scoresheet improperly scored four points for 

victim injury after the jury specifically found that appellant had not 

intentionally caused bodily harm to another. We affirm as to all other 

issues. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72, 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), 

review denied, No. SC22-1597, 2023 WL 3830251 (Fla. June 6, 2023), cert. 

pending, No. 23-5173 (U.S. July 21, 2023).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 594.511 Travel, employment, residence and maintenance transactions with the Palestinian Authority.

Effective April 12, 2006, U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions with the Palestinian Authority otherwise prohibited under this part that are ordinarily incident to their travel to or from, or employment, residence or personal maintenance within, the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority, including, but not limited to, receipt of salaries, payment of living expenses and acquisition of goods or services for personal use. Nothing in this license authorizes any debit to an account of the Palestinian Authority on the books of a U.S. financial institution or to any account blocked pursuant to this part.

[71 FR 27200, May 10, 2006]
699 A.2d 716

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. James L. HEIDECKER, Jr., Respondent.

No. 345, Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 1997, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated June 2,1997, it is hereby

ORDERED that James L. Heidecker, Jr., be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three months and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall refund the $2,500.00 retainer and, pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E., he shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board.