alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
t1N!°fED S'rATES ENV3RONMEN`rAl. PROTEC'tlON AGENCY



### ~ e WASHiNG TON, D.C. 2046(}



### David C. Moody, PhD Manager, Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 

### Carlsbad, NM 88221 Dear Dr. Moody: On July 12, 2007, the Environmental Proteetion Agency (EPA) received the Department of Energy's (DOE) "Transuranic (TRU) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Revision 6.1, DOE/WIPP-02-3122" for review.
EPA's review of Revision 6.1 of the WAC determined that this document contains few changes that are speeific to the characterization of the radioactive component of the waste. EPA does not need to concur in this doeument in order for it to be implemented by DOE. EPA determines the adequacy of the waste characterizationprocess via inspections_ However, prior to disposal of "machine compacted remotehandled waste", EPA must receive further information. You state that you do not believe that this remote handled (RH) contains cellulosic, plastic, and rubber (CPR) material in excess of INL supercompacted waste. Please provide additional information (sueh as number of containers, waste volumes, CPR content, etc.) that compares the RH compacted waste and the INL supercompacted waste prior to disposal of this type of waste at the WIPP. EPA previously determined that the WAC contains significantly less detail on the characterization techniques used for remote-handled (RH) waste than on the techniques used for CH waste (A-98-49, II-B3-99). Because these differences remain in Revision 6.1 of the WAC, EPA continues to expect each RH site to develop its waste characterization plans based on the Waste Characterization Prob am Implementation Plan (WCPIP).

Oil ~ Reeyclecifflacyoiabis ?~ S'ri:ned Wita $o€Y'

~ s.rata k* ~ pw®r %b-€

~ v .E pa?rs

~ irss s~ Sesa? §~ ~sY~a~ fiPaeeThank you for providing us with an opportrmity to review the Revision 6.1

of the WAC. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Rajani Joglekar (202-343-9462) or Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422).

'- 

# ~ Icerel 

# ~~ • 1p

Juan Reyes, Dtrector Radiation Protection Division cc: (Electronic Distribution) Lloyd Piper, CBFO Vernon Daub, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO J. R. Stroble, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Allison, Pangle, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC
<PAGE>
 
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                 Thee Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,                     September 30,

                                                                1995            1996               1995              1996
                                                                ----            ----               ----              ----
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>               <C>              <C> 


LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS                              (792,000)        (4,043,000)       (3,282,000)      (5,258,000)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS                            (119,000)          (393,000)         (359,000)        (793,000)
                                                            ----------       ------------      ------------     ------------
NET LOSS                                                    ($911,000)       ($4,436,000)      ($3,641,000)     ($6,051,000)
                                                            ==========       ============      ============     ============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
    OUTSTANDING                                            18,078,000         18,990,000        17,973,000       18,510,000
                                                           ==========         ==========        ==========       ==========



LOSS PER COMMON SHARE AND
    COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT
    Continuing Operations                                    ($0.04)             ($0.21)           ($0.18)          ($0.28)
    Discontinued Operations                                   (0.01)              (0.02)            (0.02)           (0.05)
                                                             ------              ------            ------           ------
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE AND
    COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT                                  ($0.05)             ($0.23)           ($0.20)          ($0.33)
                                                             =======             =======           =======          =======
</TABLE>
#### § 579.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
#### Dr. Theodore S. BRANDWEIN, Appellant, v. Paul M. GUSTMAN, Appellee.

No. 78-1471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 20, 1979.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1979.

Theodore S. Brandwein, in pro. per.

Paul *&*Thomson and Jon W. Zeder, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant is a medical doctor who was the plaintiff in a suit for defamation brought against the appellee who is also a medical doctor. Both doctors were members of the staff of the Miami-Dade General Hospital. The appellee was the chairman of a sub-committee of the hospital staff. The committee was charged with certain duties in acting upon complaints against members of the staff. After action by the appellee as the chairman of the committee, the appellant was granted a hearing before the Medical Executive Committee of the hospital and was suspended from privileges. Thereafter, the Governing Board of the hospital, acting after a hearing, affirmed the action of the Medical Executive Committee.

The appellant’s complaint in the circuit court sought damages against the appellee upon the ground that the appellee’s committee report was libelous. The appellee moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the report enjoyed a qualified privilege under Section 768.40(2), Florida Statutes (1977).1 The motion to dismiss *726was granted but appellant was afforded an opportunity to amend his complaint to state facts which, if proven, would show actual “malice or fraud.”

Appellant declined to amend, final judgment was entered and this appeal followed.

Appellant has presented us with four points and two sub-points on appeal. Nevertheless, we think that the single controlling question is whether the cited statute was applicable to the facts alleged in appellant’s complaint. We hold that the statute is applicable and that the trial judge properly dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. For the principles involved, see *Abram v. Odham,*89 So.2d 334 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed.

1

. “(2) There shall be no monetary liability on the part of, and no cause of action for damages shall arise against, any member of a duly appointed medical review committee for any act or proceeding undertaken or performed within the scope of the functions of any such committee if the committee member acts without malice or fraud. This immunity shall apply only to actions by providers of health services, and in no way shall this section render any medical review committee immune from any action in tort or contract brought by a patient or his *726successors or assigns. The provisions of this section do not affect the official immunity of an officer or employee of a public corporation.”
www.gpo.gov

### §5. Reports of investigations

The Director of the United States Bureau of Mines shall prepare and publish, subject to the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, under the appropriations made from time to time by Congress, reports of inquiries and investigations, with appropriate recommendations of the bureau, concerning the nature, causes, and prevention of accidents, and the improvement of conditions, methods, and equipment, with special reference to health, safety, and prevention of waste in the mining, quarrying, metallurgical, and other mineral industries; the use of explosives and electricity, safety methods and appliances, and rescue and first-aid work in said industries; the causes and prevention of mine fires; and other subjects included under the provisions of sections 1, 3, and 5 to 7 of this title.

(May 16, 1910, ch. 240, §3, 36 Stat. 370; Feb. 25, 1913, ch. 72, §3, 37 Stat. 681; Ex. Ord. No. 4239, June 4, 1925; Ex. Ord. No. 6611, Feb. 22, 1934; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 1, 3, 6, 7, 8 of this title; title 42 sections 5821, 7152.
§ 594.320 Hizballah. The term *Hizballah* means: ( a ) The entity known as Hizballah and designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189); or
( b ) Any person: ( 1 ) The property and interests in property of which are blocked pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*); and
( 2 ) Who is identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) maintained by OFAC as an agent, instrumentality, or affiliate of Hizballah.
Note 1 to § 594.320 :
The SDN List is accessible through the following page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/sdn .* Additional information pertaining to the SDN List can be found in appendix A to this chapter. Persons on the SDN List based on conduct described in § 594.201(a)(8), (10), and (11) are identified by a special reference at the end of their entries on the SDN List—“[SHIELD-ACT]”—in addition to the reference to the regulatory part of this chapter pursuant to which their property and interests in property are blocked. For example, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, § 594.201(a)(8), (10), or (11), and identified on the SDN List will have the program tag “[SDGT]” and “[SHIELD-ACT]”. Persons on the SDN List based on conduct described in § 594.201(a)(6) and (7) are identified by a special reference at the end of their entries on the SDN List—“[HIFPAA]”—in addition to the reference to the regulatory part of this chapter pursuant to which their property and interests in property are blocked. For example, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, § 594.201(a)(6) or (7), and identified on the SDN List will have the program tag “[SDGT]” and “[HIFPAA]”.
[84 FR 35313, July 23, 2019]
#### Charles A. ROBERTS, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs & Appellees, v. Jeff D. KEYS, et al., Defendants & Appellants.

No. 8669.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 10, 1982.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1982.

Writ Denied June 21,1982.

Brittain & Williams, Jack 0. Brittain, Natchitoches, for defendants-appellants-ap-pellees.

Gold, Little, Simon, Weems & Bruser, Larry Feldman, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-appellees-appellants.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Stafford, Stewart & Potter, Walter May, Voltz & Ware, Gus A. Voltz, Alexandria, for defendants-appel-lees.

Chris J. Roy, Alexandria, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before CULPEPPER, GUIDRY and STOKER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to *Bunkie Funeral Homes, Inc., et al. v. Julian McNutt, et al.,*414 So.2d 1263, in which a separate opinion is being rendered by us this date. For the reasons assigned in our opinion in the companion case, the award to Mrs. Barbara Roberts for general damages is reduced from the sum of $140,000 to the sum of $80,000. In all other respects, the judgment appealed in the present case is affirmed at the cost of defendants-appellants, Julian McNutt and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED, AS AMENDED.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY 

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT STREET, SUITE 2000 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 

VOICE AND TOO (415) 904-5200 

Dave Smith, Manager 

NPDES Permits Office 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 9 

7 5 HaWthorne St. 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Attn: Eugene Bromley 

EDMUND G. BROWN, GOVERNOR 

February 27, 2012 

Re: CD-058-11 EPA National Consistency Determination, Vessel General Permit VGP and 

small Vessel General Permit sVGP 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

On December 12, 2011, the Coastal Commission received EPA's Vessel General Permit VGP 

and small Vessel General Permit sVGP for discharges incidental to the normal operation of 

.. commercial and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 feet in length. Your 

determination indicated you would presume our concurrence if we did not respond within 60 

days (which would have been on February 11, 2012). While we previously requested a 15 day 

extension, we have consciously allowed the 7 5 day review period to expire. You may now 

presume our concurrence with this consistency determination. · 

Thank you for your cooperation, and if you have any questions, please contact me at ( 415) 904-

5289. 

cc: BCDC (Tim Eichenberg) 

SWRCB (Dominic Gregorio) 

MARK DELAPLAINE 

Manager, Energy, Ocean Resources, 

and Federal Consistency Division
§ 544.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( a ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a); or
( b ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( c ) *Example.* A license authorizing Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a), to complete a securities sale also authorizes all activities by other parties required to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, banks, etc., provided that such other parties are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a).
#### § 544.802 Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 13382 of June 28, 2005 (70 FR 38567, July 1, 2005), and any further Executive Orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as expanded by Executive Order 13094 of July 28, 1998, and with respect to which additional steps were taken in Executive Order 13382 of June 28, 2005, may be taken by the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50777

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL GUTIERREZ-MENDOZA, also known as, Raul Gutierrez-Gomez also

known as, Raul Mendoza-Gutierrez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2544-ALL

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Gutierrez-Mendoza has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gutierrez-Mendoza has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50777

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MERISEL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000724941
<NAME>                                       MERISEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                               9,264
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      247,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17,615
<INVENTORY>                                        541,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   797,218
<PP&E>                                             169,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                      81,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     910,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              656,315
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               803
<OTHER-SE>                                         119,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       910,007
<SALES>                                          3,880,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,880,314
<CGS>                                            3,692,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      190,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    20,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (34,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (35,209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.44)



</TABLE>
#### Robert Lee PARKER v. STATE of Mississippi

No. 52664.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 8, 1981.

Wayne C. Gulledge, Charles W. Broun, III, Taylor & Whitwell, Senatobia, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen., by Mark A. Chinn, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Warren County; Andrew C. Baker, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, BROOM, BOWLING and HAWKINS, JJ., concur.
#### § 515.556 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.62





Mr. Robert I. Bain
Deutsche Morgan Grenfell
6 Bishopsgate
London EC2P  2AT
UNITED KINGDOM                                        December 5, 1996


RE:   CORNERSTONE $32.5 MILLION TERM LOAN


Dear Robert,

On November 22, 1996, Cornerstone placed $100 million of preferred stock with
the New York State Teacher's Retirement System. The stock is pari-passu with the
existing preferred stock currently held by Deutsche Bank. Consequently, per our
previous agreement, we are required to revise the terms of the above stated loan
as follows.

Cornerstone Properties agrees to change the payment schedule of the loan to
incorporate a fifteen year amortization schedule. The change will have no effect
on the existing maturity date of December 31, 2003. I have attached a copy of
the proposed schedule for your review.

We also agree that, at such time as the company completes an initial public
offering in the United States and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the
first available proceeds from such offering, after costs associated with such
offering, will be used to prepay the above stated loan in full, at par.

Should there be any further documentation required with regard to this matter,
please contact us. If not, please sign below your acceptance to the change in
terms of the above stated debt facility.

Sincerely,


-------------------------                -------------------------
John S. Moody                            Kevin P. Mahoney
President                                Vice President and Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

--------------------------
Deutsche Bank AG London
P.O. Box 411
6 Bishopsgate
London EC2P 2AT

Enclosure
#### Frank Hardcastle, Respondent, *v.*Arnold B. Heine et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment ¡entered upon, a verdict' in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. '

Charles E. Rushmore, for appellants.

Abraham Gruber (Theodore B. Chancellor, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, .with costs.

Present: McCarthy and O’Dwyer, JJ

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs,