alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeCanada

# Canada

367 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Canadian Deputy Foreign Minister Morrison	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Canada	  March 10, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at Greenland Day at PDAC Mining Conference	  Jose W. FernandezMarch 4, 2024Toronto, Canada 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Canada	  March 3, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Adds Sandvine to the Entity List for Enabling Human Rights Abuses	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Endorsing Principles for 6G: Secure, Open, and Resilient by Design	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Canadian Foreign Minister Joly	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 13, 2024Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Montreal, Canada	  February 7, 2024 

previous page1234…37next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2869 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2869

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
            hydroelectric project in the State of Kentucky.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1996

Mr. Whitfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
            hydroelectric project in the State of Kentucky.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION DEADLINE FOR 
              HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT IN KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 6641, the Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and 
public interest requirements of that section and the Commission's 
procedures under that section, extend until June 15, 1998, the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence construction 
of the project.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect on the 
expiration of the extension, issued by the Commission under section 13 
of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection 
(a).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the license for the 
project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and extend until June 15, 
1998, the time required for commencement of construction of the 
project.
                                 <all>
```
www.gpo.gov

### §1164. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Fiscal years ending June 30, 1976, and September 30, 1977, through September 30, 1980

For the fiscal years ending June 30, 1976, and September 30, 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, only such sums may be appropriated as the Congress may hereafter authorize by law.

#### (b) Fiscal year ending June 30, 1975

There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration not to exceed $2,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, for the purpose of preparing the program definition under section 1122(a) of this title.

#### (c) Additional sums for Project

In addition to sums authorized to be appropriated by subsection (b) of this section, there are authorized to be appropriated to the fund not to exceed $50,000,000 annually, such sums to carry out the provisions of the loan guaranty program by the Project under subchapter II of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–410, title III, §304, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1089.)

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 1144 of this title.
§ 596.304 Financial transaction. The term *financial transaction* shall have the meaning set forth in 18 U.S.C. 1956(c)(4), as from time to time amended. As of the effective date, this term includes: ( a ) A transaction which in any way or degree affects interstate or foreign commerce; ( 1 ) Involving the movement of funds by wire or other means; or
( 2 ) Involving one or more monetary instruments; or
( 3 ) Involving the transfer of title to any real property, vehicle, vessel, or aircraft; or
( b ) A transaction involving the use of a financial institution which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce in any way or degree.
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        |
| Dated: February 27, 2019                                          |
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Thomas M. Hennigan                                                 |
| Thomas M. HenniganChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
About GAO | Contact GAO | E-mail Updates | Share/Save page

Advanced SearchSearch Only Legal Decisions

# 

        - Reports & Testimonies
        - Legal Decisions
        - Comptroller General
        - Topic Collections
        - Careers
        - FraudNet/Reporting Fraud
        - Multimedia

# Indoor Mold: Ongoing and Recently Completed Federal Research Activities(GAO-08-984SP, September 2008), an E-supplement to GAO-08-980
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Continued Progress on AUKUS Defense Trade Integration

# 											Continued Progress on AUKUS Defense Trade Integration									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 19, 2024

AUKUS partners are making significant strides toward creating an innovative ecosystem that supports our shared interests and deepens our defense and security cooperation. Trilateral partners are increasing engagement with industry, including through forums like the Sea-Air-Space global maritime exposition, individual consultations, and more. Yesterday, the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) released an “interim final rule significantly reducing licensing requirements for Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) to foster defense trade and technological innovation.” The partners welcomed the passage of the FY24 U.S National Defense Authorization Act, and legislation passed in the Australian and UK parliaments. All three AUKUS partners remain committed to implementation of novel trade critical to the success of AUKUS.

Exemptions in our export control systems, within a framework of shared standards with Australia and the UK, are key to harnessing and maximizing the innovative power residing in our defense industrial bases. Industry, research communities, and academic institutions should take full advantage of this innovation spurring ecosystem. All three nations are committed to working with our private sectors and research communities – those who will use these exemptions – to ensure the exemptions, taken together, support the goals of all three governments and our shared interests. We look forward to robust engagement and consultation with stakeholders soon, after trilateral partners publish their reciprocal arrangements for public comment.

The strength of the AUKUS partnership is rooted in the strength of our historic ties. We applaud the significant progress made to date on defense trade cooperation across our respective countries in such a short time. We fully expect to finalize the new trade exemptions – based on stakeholder input – over the course of the next 120 days.

Tags

AustraliaBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyOffice of the SpokespersonUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
§ 590.302 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201(a)(1), 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time July 25, 2011; and
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 590.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
#### James CHERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. LL-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 20, 1979.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Randolph P. Murrell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The offenses charged herein, two counts of burglary of a structure, were third degree felonies punishable by imprisonment of up to five years. Sections 810.02(3), and 775.082, Florida Statutes (1977). However, the sentence given to appellant was a prison term of five years, each count to run concurrent, but after two years, a probationary term of five years. This sentence exceeded the maximum five year sentence by two years and was thus an illegal sentence. See, e. g. *Green v. State,*354 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is modified to reduce the period of probation from five years to three years.

Appellant’s other points being without merit, the judgment is affirmed and the sentence is affirmed as modified.

McCORD, C. J., and MELYIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### John Kress, Appellant, *v.*Christian Woehrle, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1898.)

Pleading where a complaint charges fraud, there can be no recovery on contract — Proof of fraud.

Where the complaint, in an action to recover moneys, alleges them to have been obtained from the plaintiff by the defendant through fraudulent representations, it is the duty of the court, upon, finding that no fraud has been committed, to dismiss ,the complaint; and it has' no power to render :a judgment in favor ¡of the plaintiff for the amount claimed as “ for moneys loaned.”

An allegation of fraud in contracting a liability is not sustained by mere proof of a contract and its breach.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, • seventh district, rendered in his favor “ for moneys loaned. Ho fraud shown,” against the defendant, hy the acting justice thereof, without a jury.

The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the , . / opinion.

M. S. Adler, for appellant.

Julius Henry Cohen, for respondent.

Giegerich, J.

The plaintiff sued for the recovery of moneys alleged to have been obtained from him by the defendant by fraudulent-representations. The justice decided that no .fraud was shown and gave judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount *473claimed “for moneys loaned.” This was error. H the justice did not believe, as is obvious, that a fraud had been committed, it was his duty to dismiss the complaint, or, upon a conflict) of the evidence, to render a judgment in favor of the defendant, and not give judgment for the plaintiff for the sum obtained *ex contractu.*

The form of the plaintiff’s action being *ex delieio,*it was incumbent upon him to establish the fact that the defendant was guilty of fraud in contracting or incurring the liability, and his allegations were not sustained by the mere proof’ of a contract and its breach. Walter v. Bennett, 16 N. Y. 250; Ross v. Mather, 51 id. 108; Truesdell v. Bourke, 145 id. 612; Kley v. Healy, 9 Misc. Rep. 93; Smith v. Smith, 4 App. Div. 227; Starr v. Silverman, 23 Misc. Rep. 151; 50 N. Y. Supp. 657; Wright v. Duffie, 23 Misc. Rep. 338 and citations.

The judgment cannot stand in any event, because it is not *secundwn allegata et probata.*Fuld v. Kahn, 4 Misc. Rep. 600; Owens v. Flynn, 7 id. 171; Kley v. Healy, *supra.*

The judgment should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the, event.

Beekman, P. J., and Gtldebsleeve, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0273

CITY OF HARDIN,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES ACEVES, JR.,

Respondent and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 6, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

J.W.K.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 3 2020

09/03/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0273
HomeBiographies...Annette L.  Redmond

# 				Annette L.  Redmond			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Intelligence and Research												

				September 3, 2019 -									Present							

Annette L. Redmond assumed the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary (DAS) for Intelligence Policy and Coordination (IPC) in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) on 3 September 2019. She leads and directs the development, coordination, and implementation of policy relating to a broad range of intelligence operations and counterintelligence activities. DAS Redmond provides strategic direction to the Department of State’s support to the Intelligence Community and foreign policy oversight of sensitive intelligence operations.

She joined the Department of State on 3 September 2017 as the Director of the Department’s newly created Technology and Innovation Office (TIO). As TIO Director, she provided executive leadership and management of the Department’s Intelligence Information Technology enterprise and served as the Department’s Intelligence Chief Information Officer (CIO). Annette led the Department’s modernization efforts in the Intelligence Information Enterprise in partnership with the Intelligence Community (IC). Her efforts delivered, secured and protected an expanding intelligence network and IT systems providing Intelligence access to both foreign policy and intelligence professionals throughout the Department.

Annette has previously served in the IC and Department of Defense (DOD) for more than 30 years both as a retired Army officer and senior civilian. She served in senior executive positions at Army most recently as the Army’s Intelligence CIO. In this capacity, she was responsible for direction and oversight of global Intelligence Information Management/ Information Technology (IM/IT) capabilities for over 57,000 Intelligence military, civilian, and contractor professionals. She earlier served as the Enterprise Advisor to the Commanding General (CG) of US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). There she provided senior intelligence operations expertise and advice on national, joint, coalition, and Army Intelligence requirements.

In over 21 years as an Army Military Intelligence officer, Annette served in numerous assignment in increasing responsibility. She led intelligence operations as a JTF J2, commander, operational intelligence expert, and soldier at tactical and strategic echelons, command and staff elements, always driving to mission success. Her duties and accomplishments have cut across many facets of intelligence operations and information technology, data management and system interoperability. She is known for her enthusiasm, collaborative leadership and Can-Do attitude.

Ms. Redmond holds a BA in Criminal Justice from Norwich University, an MS in Strategic Intelligence from the National Intelligence University, and Chief Information Officer (CIO) Certification.

Tags

Bureau of Intelligence and ResearchState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 802.1002 Effect of determinations. ( a ) A determination under § 802.1001(a) shall take effect immediately upon publication of a notice of such determination under § 802.1001(c) and remain in effect unless rescinded under § 802.1001(b).
( b ) A rescission of a determination under § 802.1001(b) shall take effect on the date specified in the notice published under § 802.1001(c).
( c ) A determination under § 802.1001(a) does not apply to any transaction for which a declaration or notice has been accepted by the Staff Chairperson under § 802.403(a)(1) or § 802.503(a), respectively.
( d ) A rescission of a determination under § 802.1001(b) does not apply to any transaction for which: ( 1 ) The completion date is prior to the date upon which the rescission of a determination under paragraph (b) of this section becomes effective; or
( 2 ) Before publication of the rescission of determination under § 802.1001(c), the parties to the transaction have executed a binding written agreement, or other binding document, establishing the material terms of the transaction that is ultimately consummated.
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Resp onses June 16, 2011

A-1 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices

For Proposed Amendments to Ru le 4401 

## APPENDIX A

Summary of Significant Comments

And District Responses

June 16, 2011SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Resp onses June 16, 2011

A-2 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices

For Proposed Amendments to Ru le 4401 This page intentionally blank.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Resp onses June 16, 2011

A-3 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices

For Proposed Amendments to Ru le 4401 

### Summary of Significant Comments and District Respon ses for Draft

Amendments to Rule 4401 dated May 19, 2011

US EPA REGION IX STAFF COMMENTS

EPA reviewed the proposed rule project and has no c omments at this time.

ARB STAFF COMMENTS

No comment letter was received from ARB for this ru le project at this time.

STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS

COMMENT: Section 6.1.8 has an incomplete sentence. (Chevr on)

RESPONSE: Section 6.1.8 has been updated as appropriate. Ple ase see Proposed

Rule language for this amendment.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Resp onses June 16, 2011

A-4 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices

For Proposed Amendments to Ru le 4401 This page intentionally blank.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

—

nnestion of bemvont eee ate

Armes compat ty tee tame Cees Seve SE) ba tem
‘er Lam ethan Pa HH — _
ete mararenst

“he reer on tem mas et me he Met jenny ngs fe mt
petecaee oem ne C9 Chet Neve Uege ante ae ae
Bae ee

ii
i}

Alor COMPOUE NTERVALL 9 METERS TO war LPT
UR EMENeRD BY 2 METER meTERWACS

DANI Mafnne DWE LETO WATE

pesemerm atte pea

—
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         663,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,463,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                   278,379
<INVENTORY>                                  7,568,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,492,674
<PP&E>                                      33,876,903
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,295,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,484,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,685,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       259,734
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,484,666
<SALES>                                     40,007,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,100,187
<CGS>                                       32,624,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,702,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             335,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,187,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                   844,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,389,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,389,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>