# COMPLIANCE 

# T EST 

# REPORT 

# B AGHOUSE 

# N O

# . 5 A T 

# N OVELIS 

# , I NC 

# . P ROJECT 

# ID: KR- 7102

PREPARED 

# FOR 

# :



# N OVELIS 

# , INC 

# . 1261 WILLOW 

# RUN 

# ROAD 

# GREENSBORO 

# , GEORGIA 

# 30642

PREPARED 

# B Y 

# : 

# ADVANCED 

# INDUSTRIAL 

# RESOURCES 

# , INC 

# . 3407 N OVIS 

# POINTE 

# A CWORTH 

# , GEORGIA 

# 30101

FEBRUARY 

# 22
-23, 2012

# TABLE OF 

# C ONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM 1 1.2 KEY PERSONNEL 2
2.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING L OCATION DESCRIPTIONS 3
2.1 PROCESS & CONTROL EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION 3 2.2 MACT PROCESSES AND STANDARDS 3 2.3 RAW MATERIALS 4 2.4 CYCLE TIMES 4 2.5 PROCESS MONITORING 5 2.6 SAMPLING LOCATION 5
3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 6
3.1 OBJECTIVES 6 3.2 FIELD TEST CHANGES AND PROBLEMS 6 3.3 PRESENTATION OF TEST RESULTS 6 3.4 PRO CESS MONITORING 8
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTI CAL PROCEDURES 9

5.0 INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES 10
5.1 INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE 10 5.2 SAMPLING TRAIN LEAK CHECKS 10 5.3 PROBE NOZZLE DIAMETER CHECKS 11 5.4 PITOT TUBE FACE PLANE ALIGNMENT CHECK 11 5.5 METERING SYSTEM CALIBRATION 11 5.6 TEMPERATURE GAUGE CALIBRATION 12 5.7 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROCEDURES 12 5.8 DATA REDUCTION CHECKS 12 5.9 EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE 13 5.9.1 TEST PROTOCOL EVALUATION 13 5.9.2 ON

- SITE TEST EVALUATION 13
6.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES 14

# LIST OF 

# A PPENDICES

APPENDIX 

# A TEST 

# RESULTS 

# APPENDIX 

# B FIELD 

# DATA 

# REDUCTION 

# APPENDIX 

# C EXAMPLE 

# CALCULATIONS AND 

# N OMENCLATURE 

# APPENDIX 

# D FIELD 

# DATA 

# APPENDIX 

# E LABORATORY 

# REPORT 

# APPENDIX 

# F CALIBRATION 

# DATA 

# APPENDIX 

# G PROCESS 

# OPERATION 

# DATA

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 1 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM
Novelis, Inc. (Novelis) operates a Secondary Aluminum production facility in Greensboro, Georgia. The facility is subject to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) Title V Operating Permit No. 3341

- 133

- 0001

- V

- 03

- 0 and the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) requirements of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63 (40 CFR 63) Subpart RRR (Secondary Aluminum MACT). The Baghouse 5 (BAG5 ) exhaust was previously tested on December 15

- 16, 2011 to determine the filterable particulate matter (PM), dioxins/furans (D/F), and hydrogen chloride (HCl) emission rates and concentrations for compliance demonstration purposes. PM and D/F emissions during the 2011 compliance demonstration were found to be well below the established emission limits. However, the HCl emissions were found to be exceeding the applicable emission limits on the day of testing. Therefore, the test program described in this report was conducted as a re

- test to provide data and demonstrate that the BAG5 HCl emissions meet the applicable emissions limitations. The test program was conducted in accordance with a Georgia EPD

- approved Site

- Specific Test Protocol (SSTP) to document that this source operates below the applicable emissions limits in 40 CFR 63.1505 and the facility’s Title V Permit 3341

- 133

- 0001

- V

- 03

- 0

. The field sampling portion of the test program was conducted February 22

- 23, 2012 . All field sampling and reporting activities were conducted by Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. ( AIR). This Test Report presents the results of the compliance test program.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 2 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## 1.2 KEY PERSONNEL The key personnel responsible for the coordination and performance of test program activities are:
Allan Dean, Novelis, Inc. (706) 454

- 3210 Robert Higdon, Novelis, Inc. (70 6) 454

- 32 35 Derek Stephens, Advanced Industrial Resources (404) 843

- 2100 Scott Wilson, Advanced Industrial Resources 800

- 224

- 5007

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 3 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 2.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS

2.1 PROCESS & CONTROL EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Novelis operates a secondary aluminum production facility in Greensboro, Georgia. Novelis recycles used beverage cans (UBC) and scrap aluminum into large stock ingots that are shipped to rolling mills where they are rolled into coils of beverage can sheet stock. Baled aluminum cans are broken up and fed into a shredder (source code SHRD) reducing the aluminum to one

-half to one

- inch sized pieces. Iron and steel are removed with a magnetic separator and dirt is separated out using screens. Shredded aluminum is fed into a decoater (s ource code DCTR), which uses hot air to remove paint and lacquer. The decoater exhaust is vented back to the decoater for heat recovery. The aluminum is then fed into one of three reverberatory melt furnaces (source codes FCE1, FCE2, and FCE3). The furnaces are fired with either natural gas or propane. Dross removal occurs at the furnaces. Molten metal is gravity fed to a natural gas or propane fired holding furnace (source code HOLD) for metal cleaning and transfer to the casting unit. A mixture of chlorine and argon gases is injected in

- line to remove impurities from the molten aluminum. Excess gas is removed in a compact degasser. A direct chill caster is used to form aluminum ingots weighing 50,000 to 60,000 pounds each.

2.2 MACT PROCESSES AND STANDARDS Of the processes at the facility, several are subject to the emission limits and monitoring requirements of the Secondary Aluminum MACT and the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) . These include the two shredders , a decoater, three melt furnaces, two induction furnaces, ACD, and a holding furnace.
Each of the three reverberatory melt furnaces is classified as a Group 1 furnace under 40 CFR 63.1503 since coated aluminum, at times, is melted in them. Emissions from the side wells and main hearths on the No. 1 and No. 2 Melting Furnaces are controlled by two lime

- injected baghouses (BAG1 and BAG2), which discharge through a common stack. Emissions from the side well on Furnace 3 are controlled by another lime

- injected baghouse (BAG5).

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 4 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## The holding furnace is classified as a Group 1 furnace since reactive flux is used to clean and process the molten aluminum. The compact degasser is classified as an in

- line fluxer. Emissions from the in

- line fluxer are ducted to the flame zone of the burner for the holding furnace to achieve oxidation of any pollutants that may be present. The exhaust from the holding furnace, which then includes exhaust from the in

- line fluxer, is discharged to the atmosphere through the holding furnace stack.
Collectively the four Group 1 furnaces and the in

- line fluxer may be classified as a secondary aluminum processing unit (SAPU). 40 CFR 63.1505(k) provides equations for calculating SAPU emission limits based upon PM, HCl and D/F emission standards for the individual emission sources, which are established in 40 CFR 63.1505(i) and (j). The equations are based upon charge rates or may be based upon production rates, at the discretion of Novelis, in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1506(d)(3). Emission rates were calculated based upon output production rate. Charge and production rate data is presented in Appendix G

.

2.3 RAW MATERIALS UBC and scrap aluminum are transported to the facility by rail car and truck. Coated aluminum, including all UBC, is fed into the shredding and decoating processes . Coated and uncoated scrap aluminum and alloys are fed directly into the three melt furnaces. . While performance tests were being conducted, the furnaces were operated at optimal production level with charge materials representative of the range of materials processed by the unit and at the optimal reactive fluxing rate

. Charge, production , and fluxing rate data are presented in Appendix G

.

2.4 CYCLE TIMES The facility includes batch processes in the melt furnaces. Each test run was conducted for the period of the source’s entire process operating cycle . Cycle times for this period ranged from approximately 6.0 to 7 .0 hours.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 5 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## 2.5 PROCESS MONITORING All essential process monitoring equipment on the emission sources and control equipment were operating properly and recording data throughout the test period so as to allow necessary monitoring parameters and limits to be established. Monitoring data is presented in Appendix G

.

2. 6 SAMPLING LOCATION

The BAG5 sampling point is located 3.1 equivalent stack diameters downstream from the nearest upstream flow disturbance and 1.4 equivalent stack diameters upstream from the stack exhaust. The duct has a circular cross

- section with an internal diameter of 59 .0 inches. The stack has two sampling ports oriented 90 degrees to one another in a plane perpendicular to the exhaust gas flow direction. A schematic diagram of the sampling location is presented in Appendix D. Twenty four sampling points (twelve traverse points in e ach of the two sampling ports) were used for USEPA Methods 2, 3 , 4 and 26A sampling, in accordance with the requirements of USEPA Method 1.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 6 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS

3.1 OBJECTIVES Novelis, Inc. operates a Secondary Aluminum production facility in Greensboro, Georgia. The facility is subject to the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) requirements of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63 (40 CFR 63) Subpart RRR (Secondary Aluminum MACT) and its Title V Permit 3341

- 133

- 0001

- V

- 03

- 0 . The Furnace 3 total emissions (sidewells and main hearth) w ere tested under a single maximum throughput operating condition during three separate batch process cycles to determine hydrogen chloride (HCl) emission rates.

3.2 FIELD TEST CHANGES AND PROBLEMS The testing was conducted in accordance with the Site

- Specific Test Protocol submitted to Georgia EPD prior to testing. No significant problems were encountered during testing that required deviation from the planned test protocol. Due to varying lengths of the process cycle times, test durations varied from 6.0 to 7.0 hours. Traverse point sample durations utilized were 1 0 minutes per point and upon sampling at the initial 24 traverse points, testing continued by starting back at the respective traverse point 1 in the first port sampled, respectively.

3.3 PRESENTATION OF TEST RESULTS Emission rates are summarized and compared to applicable MACT and permit limits in Table 3

- 2

. Table 3

- 1 contains the Performance Test Matrix data and Table 3

- 3 summarizes the Operating Parameter Values measured throughout the testing. Concentrations and mass rates are presented in Appendix A. Reduced and tabulated data from the field

- testing is included in Appendix B. The calculations and nomenc lature used to reduce the data are presented in Appendix C. Actual raw field data sheets are presented in Appendix D

.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 7 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# Table 3
- 1: Performance Test Matrix

Source Source Code Air pollution control device Stack ID Analytes EPA Methods Test run duration Run Number Date Start

- Stop Time

FCE3 side well & main hearth FCE3 BAG5 BAG5 HCl 1, 2, 3, 4, 26A 390 min (6.5hrs) 1 2/22/2012 8:00

- 14:40
420 min (7 hrs) 2 2/22/2012 15:10

- 20:20
360 min (6.0 hrs) 3 2/23/2012 9:20

- 15:30



# Table 3
-2: MACT Performance Test Results Summary for SAPU Based on Production Output Rates (2/22
- 23/2012)

BAG3 / FCE3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average EHCl 

### lb/cycle 1.76 2.93 3.37 2.69
T i 

### ton production/cycle 43.7 52.6 37.0 44.4
EHCl 

### lb/ton production 0.0403 0.0558 0.0911 0.0624
EHCl, Allow 

### lb/ton production 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 % of PM allowable % 10% 14% 23% 16%

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 8 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# Table 3
-3: Operating Parameter Values during Test (newly established operating parameters)


### Source or APC Device Source Code Source or APC Name Operating Parameter (units) Limiting Value

FCE1, 2 & 3 Melt furnaces 1, 2 and 3 Average reactive flux injection rate Production

FCE3 or BAG5 Baghouse 5 Inlet temperature (degrees F) 163
Production (tons / cycle) 44.4 Total Paint Coated Scrap (lbs / cycle) 32,244 Average reactive flux injection rate Total salt (total available Chlorine) lbs / cycle) 2314 (1194)
Lime feed conveyor speed (Hz) 12



## 3.4 PROCESS MONITORING All essential process monitoring equipment on the process at Novelis were operating properly and recording data throughout the test period so as to allow necessary monitoring parameters and limits to be established. Data is presented in Appendix G.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 9 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The testing was conducted on in accordance with 40 CFR 60 Appendix A. Specifically:

 EPA Method 1 was used for the qualification of the location of sampling ports and for the determination of the number and posi tions of stack traverse points, as applicable to sample traverses for Method 2.

 EPA Method 2 was employed for the determination of the stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate during stack sampling using the Type “S” Pitot tube.

 EPA Method 3 was use d for the calculation of the density and dry molecular weight of the effluent stack gas.

 EPA Method 4 was used for the determination of moisture content.

 EPA Method 26A was used for the determination of hydrogen chloride (HCl) emission concentration and rates. All samples were stored upright in a closed sample box until final laboratory analysis. In order to limit the chain of custody, only essential AIR personnel were permitted access to these samples.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 10 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 5.0 INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) measures associated with the sampling and analysis procedures given in the noted EPA reference methodologies, in Subparts A of 40 CFR 60 and 40 CFR 63 , and in the EPA QA/QC Handbook, Volume III (EPA 600/R

- 94/03 8c) were employed, as applicable. Such measures included, but were not limited to, the procedures detailed below.

5.1 INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) measures associated with the sampling and analysis procedure s given in the noted EPA reference methodologies, in Subparts A of 40 CFR 60 and 40 CFR 63 , and in the EPA QA/QC Handbook, Volume III (EPA 600/R

- 94/038c) were employed, as applicable. Such measures include, but are not limited to, the procedures detailed below.

5.2 SAMPLING TRAIN LEAK CHECKS Determinations of the leakage rate of the Method 5 type sampling trains were made before and after each sampling run using the procedure detailed in Section 8.1.4 of EPA Method 5. Before the sampling run, after the sampling trains had been assembled and probe and filter box temperatures had time enough to settle at their appropriate operating values, the probe nozzle was plugged and the system was evacuated to a pressure of 15 inches of Hg below ambient pressure. The volumetric leakage rate was measured by the dry gas meter over the course of one (1) minute. The leakage rate was less than 0.020 cfm for each run, thereby meeting the maximum allowable leakage rate. After the sampling run, before the train was disa ssembled the probe nozzle was plugged and the system depressurized to a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. The dry gas meter measured the volumetric leakage rate over the course of one (1) minute. Except as noted in Section 3.2 of this report, the leakage rate was determined to be less than 0.020 cfm, thereby meeting the maximum allowable leakage rate.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 11 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## The Type “S” Pitot tube assembly was also checked for leaks before and after sampling runs using the procedure in Section 8.1 of EPA Method 2. The impact opening of the Pitot tube was blown through until a pressure of at least 3 inches of water registered on the manometer. The impact opening was quickly plugged and held for at least 15 seconds, during which time the manometer reading held. The same operation was performed on the static pressure side of the Pitot tube, except suction was used to obtain the pressure differential.

5.3 PROBE NOZZLE DIAMETER CHECKS

Probe nozzles were calibrated before field tes ting by measuring the internal diameter of the nozzle entrance orifice along three different diameters. Each diameter was measured to the nearest 0.001 inch, and all measurements were averaged. The diameters were within the limit of acceptable variation of 0.004”.

5.4 PITOT TUBE FACE PLANE ALIGNMENT CHECK Before field testing, each Type S Pitot tube was examined in order to verify that the face planes of the tube were properly aligned, per Method 2 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. The external tubing diameter and base

- to

- face plane distances were measured in order to verify the use of 0.84 as the baseline (isolated) Pitot coefficient. At that time the entire probe assembly (i.e., the sampling probe, nozzle, thermocouple, and Pitot tube) was inspected in order to verify that its components met the interference

- free alignment specifications given in EPA Method 2. Because the specifications were met, then the baseline Pitot coefficient was used for the entire probe assembly. After field testing, the face plane alignment of each Pitot tube was checked. No damage to the tube orifices was noted.

5.5 METERING SYSTEM CALIBRATION Every three months each dry gas meter (DGM) console is calibrated at five orifice settings according to Method 5 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. From the calibration data, calculations of the values of Y m 

## and H @ 

## are made, and an average of each set of values

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 12 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## is obtained. The limit of total variation of Y m 

## values is +0.02, and the limit for H @ 

## values is +0.20. After field testing, the calibration of the DGM console was checked by performing three calibration runs at a single intermediate orifice setting that is representative of the range used during field

- testing. Each DGM was within the limit of acceptable relative variation from Ym 

## of 5.0%.

5.6 TEMPERATURE GAUGE CALIBRATION After field testing, the temp erature measuring instruments on each sampling train was calibrated against standardized mercury

- in

- glass reference thermometers. Each indicated temperature was within the limit of acceptable variation between the absolute reference temperature and the ab solute indicated temperature of 1.5%.

5.7 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROCEDURES All samples were transported in a closed sample box, the security of which was the responsibility of the AIR Test Director, Mr. Mark Eddy . These samples were received, checked, and numbered by the Test Director and custody records were written. The AIR QA Director, Mr. Derek Stephens, then again checked the integrity of the samples and their identification. The samples collected during the test program were place d in shipping coolers with sufficient insulation to prevent breakage during shipping. All samples in a shipping container were listed on the chain

- of

- custody form enclosed in the shipping container. Once the samples were securely packaged, the container was sealed with tape and several custody seals were placed over the top edge so that the container could not be opened without breaking the custody seals.

5.8 DATA REDUCTION CHECKS

AIR ran an independent check (using a validated computer program) of the calculations with predetermined data before the field test, and the AIR Team Leader conducted spot

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 13 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

## checks on

- site to assure that data was being recorded accurately. After the test, AIR checked the data input to assure that the raw data had been transferre d to the computer accurately. Flow rates, temperatures and moisture levels were relatively constant (variation <5%) during the three test runs, which indicates that data recording and Method 2 and 4 sampling and calculation errors are not likely.

5. 9 EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE

5.9.1 TEST PROTOCOL EVALUATION

A Site

- Specific Test Protocol was submitted to the Georgia EPD in advance of testing, which provi ded regulatory personnel the opportunity to review and comment upon the test and quality assurance procedures used in conducting this testing.

5.9.2 ON

- SITE TEST EVALUATION

A test schedule was submitted with the Site

- Specific Test Protocol and Georgia EPD personnel were notified of all changes in the schedule. No tests were performed earlier than stated in the original schedule. Therefore, regulatory personnel were afforded the opportunity for on

- site evaluation of all test procedures.

### Novelis, Inc. Greensboro, Georgia February 22

- 23, 2012 Compliance Test Report

- BAG5 Page 14 of 14

Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. 

# 6.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The data quality objectives (DQOs) process is generally a seven

- step iterative planning approach to ensure development of sampling designs for data collection activities that support deci sion making. The seven steps are as follows: (1) defining the problem; (2) stating decisions and alternative actions; (3) identifying inputs into the decision; (4) defining the study boundaries; (5) defining statistical parameters, specifying action level s, and developing action logic; (6) specifying acceptable error limits; and (7) selecting resource - effective sampling and analysis plan to meet the performance criteria. The first five steps are primarily focused on identifying qualitative criteria such a s the type of data needed and defining how the data will be used. The sixth step defines quantitative criteria and the seventh step is used to develop a data collection design. In regards to emissions sampling, these steps have already been identified fo r typical monitoring parameters. Monitoring methods presented in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A indicate the following regarding DQOs: Adherence to the requirements of this method will enhance the quality of the data obtained from air pollutant sampling methods. At a minimum, each method provides the following types of information: summary of method; equipment and supplies; reagents and standards; sample collection, preservation, storage, and transportation; quality control; calibration and standardization; analyti cal procedures, data analysis and calculations; and alternative procedures. These test methods have been designed and tested according to DQOs for emissions testing and analysis. These test methods have been specified and were followed in accordance with the Test Protocol submitted to Georgia EPD to ensure that DQOs were met for this project.

# APPENDIX 

# A
TEST 

# RESULTS

### Notes: 1) Allowable HCl emission limit from 40 CFR 63.1505(i)4 - 0.40 lb HCl/ton feed *Process feed rate based upon production output



## Pm Pressure of meter gases 

## Ps Pressure of stack gases 

## Vm(std) Volume of gas sample 

## Vw(std),meas Meas. volume of water vapor 

## B ws,meas Measured moisture 

## B ws,theo Theoretical max. moisture 

## B ws,act Actual moisture 

## Md Mol. Wt. Of gas at DGM 

## Ms Mol. Wt. Of gas at stack 

## vs Velocity of stack gas 

## A n Area of nozzle 

## 0.015

28.85 0.245

0.000341 lb./lb.-mole
ft./sec 51.04
18.99 28.86 29.76
4.24
0.224 0.012 6.67
0.322 0.189 0.011
0.021 

# Novelis

Run 3

14:40 End Time Average 22-Feb-12 Run 2 Run 1
9:20 23-Feb-12

5.10 317.26 4.38 15:10 

# Baghouse No. 5 Greensboro, Georgia

29.79 inches Hg 22-Feb-12 Units

30.06

scf 348.99 dscf 22:20
29.81 30.09 15:30

28.86 0.011
28.73
0.000341 

# HCl Test Results

Test Date

384.75 8:00
30.10 Start Time

ft2 

## 51.66
ft2 

## 0.000341 49.43
18.99 0.015

18.99 0.000341 18.99 28.61 28.70 50.71 28.84 lb./lb.-mole 0.012 0.021 inches Hg
344.95

dimensionless

28.74 29.81 30.11 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc.

A n Area of nozzle 

## A s Area of stack 

## Gas Stream Flow Rates Q a Vol. Flow rate of actual gas 

## Q sd Vol. Flow rate of dry gas 

## I Isokinetic sampling ratio 

## Process Data

Gas Stream Hydrogen Chloride Concentrations Method 26a cHCl Conc. Of HCl in dry stack gas 

## cHCl Conc. Of HCl in dry stack gas 

## Hydrogen Chloride Mass Rates Method 26a E HCl Emission rate of HCl 

## E HCl Emission rate of HCl 

### EHCl

### All 1 Allowable HCl Emission Rate 

### % of All % of Allowable 

## 57,768

44.4

0.0624 0.407 0.000341

16% 2.21 0.000965 6.63 100.8

0.4 23% 0.4 0.0911 0.547 0.0403 0.264 0.00132 mg/dscm 1.44 2.16 0.000943 3.02

lb/hour 6.00 37.0 50,596 48,250 99.7 48,904 100.8 percent 58,142 18.99 0.000341 ft2



## 58,853 dscfm ft2 

## 0.000341

cfm 56,308 18.99

101.8 18.99

49,250 0.000341 18.99

7.34

14% 0.4 0.4 gr/dscf 0.000630

% 10% lb/ton prod'n 0.0558 52.6

lb/ton prod'n 0.409 P (ouput) Feed Rate (output) 

## tons/cycle 43.7 6.55 tons/hour

# APPENDIX 

# B
FIELD 

# DATA 

# REDUCTION

## Vm 

### Volume of gas sample 

## Mlc 

### Mass of liquid collected 

## p Velocity head of stack gas 

## ( p) 1/2 

### Square root of velocity head 

## H Pressure differential Total sampling time
p 

### Total production time 

## dcf g inches H 2

## O
2.91 (inches H 2

### O) 1/2


## minutes 366.816

420.0 3.04

0.250 inches H 2

## O
minutes 

## End Time Units C p 

## :

22:20 Test Team: WLN, CS, RD EPA Methods: 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A 

## Console ID: Ym 

## :



## Test Date 0.84 Novelis

Run 3

0.833 Client: Location: Source: Greensboro, Georgia Baghouse No. 5 C-008 0.954 1.973 H @ 

## : 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc.

0.778 0.751 8:00 14:40 

# Data Reduction Sheet

15:30 9:20 

## Start Time

inches 0.250 HCl

Run 2 Analyte(s):

Run 1

400.0 430.0 89.8
0.856
390.0 0.733 141.4 15:10

92.9 414.884 345.933

0.824 2.93 360.0 22-Feb-12 22-Feb-12 23-Feb-12

0.250 370.0 Total sampling time
p 

### Total production time 

## D n 

### Diameter of nozzle 

## D s 

### Diameter of stack 

## T m 

### Temperature of meter 

## T s 

### Temperature of stack gas 

## Pbar 

### Barometric pressure 

## p g 

### Gauge pressure of stack gas 

## % O 2 

### Percent O2 by volume 

## % CO 2 

### Percent CO2 by volume 

## % N2 

### Percent N2 by volume 

## mHCl 

### Hydrogen Chloride Mass

*Process feed rate based upon production output 

## minutes 420.0

605 inches 0.250 minutes

598 539 59.0 inches 0.250
546 400.0 430.0 390.0

59.0 360.0

6.0 27.168 73,989 37.0 0.250

620 59.0 552

0.00 370.0

percent (v

## /v

## ) 20.80 °R °R inches Hg 29.89 -1.10 inches H 2

## O

14.098 79.1 23.516 29.89

79.0 20.80 0.20 -1.10 percent (v

## /v

## ) 0.20

43.7 79.0

tons/cycle percent (v

## /v

## ) mg 

## P (output) 

### Feed Rate (output) 

## lb/cycle 87,388
tons/hour 6.6 7.3 105,162 52.6 -1.10 29.84
20.90

# APPENDIX 

# C
EXAMPLE 

# CALCULATIONS
AND 

# NOMENCLATURE

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Sample Calculation Sheet Novelis, Greensboro, Georgia Baghouse No. 5, Run #1

Area of nozzle: An= 3.1415 x D n2/ 4 / 144 in2/ft2 An= 3.1415 x (0.25) / 4 / 144 An= 0.000341 ft2

Area of stack: A s= 3.1415 x D s 2/ 4 / 144 in2/ft2 A s= 3.1415 x (59) / 4 / 144 A s= 18.99 ft2
Absolute pressure of meter gases: Pm = Pbar + ∆H / 13.6 Pm = 29.89 + 2.908 /13.6 Pm = 30.10 inches Hg Absolute pressure of stack gases: P s= Pbar + p g/ 13.6 P s= 29.89 + -1.1 / 13.6 P s= 29.81 inches Hg Volume of gas sample, standardized: Vm(std)= Vm x Ym (T std/ Tm) (Pm / P std)

*Note: Values may not agree exactly with results shown elsewhere in this report due strictly to rounding Vm(std)= Vm x Ym (T std/ Tm) (Pm / P std) Vm(std)= (366.816) x (0.954) x (528/539) x (30.1/29.92) Vm(std)= 344.86 dscf Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, standardized: V w(std)= (V lcx p wx R x T std) / (Mwx P std) V w(std)= (89.82) x (0.002201) x (21.85) x (528) / (18 x 29.92) V w(std)= 4.23 scf Volume proportion of water in the stack gas stream, measured: B ws,meas= V w(std)/ (Vm(std)+ V w(std)) B ws,meas= (4.23 / (344.86 + 4.23)) B ws,meas= 0.0121 Volume proportion of water in the stack gas stream, theoretical maximum: B ws,theo= 10 {6.37-2827/(Ts - 95.2)} / P s B ws,theo= 10 ^ {6.37-2827/(598 - 95.2)} / 29.81 B ws,theo= 0.1876

*Note: Values may not agree exactly with results shown elsewhere in this report due strictly to rounding

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Sample Calculation Sheet Novelis, Greensboro, Georgia Baghouse No. 5, Run #1
Volume proportion of water in the stack gas stream: B ws,act= lower of B ws,measand B ws,theo B ws,act= 0.0121
Theoretical maximum moisture collection at saturation: V lc,theo= Vm(std)x B ws,theo/ (1 - B ws,theo) / 0.04707 V lc,theo= (344.86 x (0.1876) / (1 - 0.1876) / 0.04707 V lc,theo= 1691.8 Nitrogen content of gas at the DGM: %N2= 100% - %CO 2 - %O 2
- %CO %N2= 100% - 0.2% - 20.8% - 0% %N2= 79 % Molecular weight of gas at the DGM: M d= ((44 x %CO 2)+ (32 x %O 2)+ (28 x (%N2+ %CO)))/100% M d= ((44 x 0.2) + (32 x 20.8) + (28 (79 + 0)))/100% M d= 28.86 lb/lb-mole Molecular weight of gas at the stack: M s= M d(1 - B ws) + Mwx B ws M s= (28.86 x (1 - 0.0121)) + (18 x 0.0121)

*Note: Values may not agree exactly with results shown elsewhere in this report due strictly to rounding M s= 28.73 lb/lb-mole Velocity of stack gas:
v s= Kpx C p[ ∆p] 1/2x [T s/(P sM s)] 1/2

v s= (85.49 x 0.84 x 0.824 x [598 / (29.81 x 28.73)]^1/2
v s= 49.45 ft/s Volumetric flow rate of actual stack gas: Qa = v sx A sx 60 sec/min Q a = (49.45) x (18.99) x (60 sec/min) Q a = 56343 cfm Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas, standardized: Q sd= (60 sec/min) x (1 - B ws) v sA s(T std/ T s) x (P s/P std) Q sd= (60 sec/min) x (1 - 0.0121) x 49.45 x 18.99 x (528 / 598) x (29.81 / 29.92) Q sd= 48965 dscfm

*Note: Values may not agree exactly with results shown elsewhere in this report due strictly to rounding

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Sample Calculation Sheet Novelis, Greensboro, Georgia Baghouse No. 5, Run #1
Isokinetic sampling ratio expressed as percentage: I= 100 T s[(K3x V lc)+ (Ym x Vm x Pm / Tm)] / ( 60 x Qx v sx P sx An) I= I= 100.6 % Concentration of HCl in dry stack gas, standardized:
c= (m / Vm(std)) (35.32 ft3/ m3 )
c= (14.098 / 344.86) x 35.32
c= 1.44 mg/dscm Concentration of HCl in dry stack gas, standardized:
c= (mg/dscm) / (35.32 ft3/ m3 ) / (64.8 mg/gr)
c= (1.44389) / 35.32 / 64.8
c= 0.000631 gr/dscf Emission rate of HCl, time basis: E = cmg/dscm x Q sdx (60 min/hr) x (2.2046 x 10 -6lb/mg) / (35.32 ft3/ m3 ) E = 1.44389 x 48965 x 60 x 2.2046 x 10-6 / 35.32 E = 0.265 lb/hr 100 x (598) x ((0.002669 x 89.82) + (0.954 x 366.816 x 30.1 / 539)))/(60 x 390 x 49.45 x 29.81 x 0.000341)

*Note: Values may not agree exactly with results shown elsewhere in this report due strictly to rounding

# EXAMPLE 

# CALCULATIONS

An 

# = D n2 

#  / 4 A s 

# = D s 2 

#  / 4 B ws 

# = V w(std) 

# / (Vm(std) 

# + Vw(std) 

# ) c analyte 

# = (manalyte 

# / V m(std) 

# ) (35.31466 ft3

# /m3 

# ) ‘c analyte 

# = (manalyte 

# / V m(std) 

# ) (0.015432 gr/mg) c analyte 

# = ‘c analyte 

# MWanalyte 

# / 24.04 l/mol CC = t0.975 

# (S d 

# / n 1/2

# ) d = 1/n ( S di

# ) DE = (EInlet 

# – EOutlet

# ) / E ,Inlet 

# x 100% Eanalyte 

# = (manalyte 

# / V m(std) 

# ) Q sd 

# (60 min/hr) (2.2046x10 - 6 

# lb./mg) Eanalyte 

# = c analyte 

# Q sd 

# (60 min/hr) (2.2046x10 - 6 

# lb./mg) I = 100 T s 

# (K3 

# Vlc 

# + Ym 

# V m 

# Pm 

# / Tm

# ) / (60  v s 

# P s 

# An

# ) where K3 

# = 0.002669 (in. Hg ft3 

# ) / (mL  R) KI 

# = [(2.0084x107 

# H @ 

# ) An 

# (1

– B ws

# )] 2 

# (M d 

# / M s

# ) (Tm 

# / T s

# ) (P s 

# / Pm

# ) M d 

# = 0.44 (% CO 2

# ) + 0.32 (% O 2

# ) + 0.28 (% N2 

# + % CO) M s 

# = M d 

# (1

– B ws

# ) + M w 

# B ws 

# P = Qsd / F

-Factor x 60 x (20.9

- O 2

# ) / 20.9 Pm 

# = Pbar 

# + H / 13.6 P s 

# = Pbar 

# + p g 

# / 13.6 Q a 

# = (60 s/min) v s 

# A s 

# Q sd 

# = (60 s/min) (1

- B ws

# ) v s 

# A s 

# (T std 

# / T s

# ) (P s 

# / P std

# ) RA = [Abs(d) + Abs(CC)]/RM S d 

# = [( S di2



# – ( S di) 2

# /n)/(n

- 1)] 1/2 

# Tm 

# = tm 

# + 460  T s 

# = ts 

# + 460  V m(std) 

# = V m 

# Ym 

# (T std 

# / Tm

# ) (Pm 

# / P std

# ) Vw(std) 

# = (Vlc 

#  w 

# R T std

# ) / (M w 

# P std

# )
v s 

# = K p 

# C p 

# [p] 1/2 

# [T s 

# / (P s 

# M s

# )] 1/2

# N OMENCLATURE
Symbol Units Description Abs(x) dimensionless Absolute value of parameter x A n 

## ft2 

## Area of the nozzle A s 

## ft2 

## Area of the stack B ws 

## dimensionless Volume proportion of water in the stack gas stream C p 

## dimensionless Type S pitot tube coef ficient
canalyte 

## mg/dscm Concentration of analyte in dry stack gas, standardized 'canalyte 

## gr./dscf Concentration of analyte in dry stack gas, standardized 'canalyte 

## ppm Concentration of analyte in dry stack gas, standardized CC dimensionless One

- tailed 2.5% error confidence coefficient d ppm Arithmetic mean of differences di 

## ppm Difference between individual CEM and reference method concentration value D n 

## inches Internal diameter of the nozzle at the entrance orifice D s 

## inches Internal diameter of the stack at sampling location DE percent Destruction efficiency  H inches H 2

## O Average pressure differential across the meter orifice  H @ 

## inches H 2

## O Orifice pressure differential that corresponds to 0.75 cfm of air at 68 °F and 29.92 inches of Hg  p inches H 2

## O Velocity head of stack gas E analyte 

## lb./hour Emission rate of analyte, time basis I percent Isokinetic sampling ratio expressed as percentage KI 

## dimensionless K

- factor, ratio of DH to DP, ideal Kp 

## ft[(lb/lb

- mol)(in. Hg)] 1/2 

## Type S pitot tube constant, s[(°R)(in. H 2

## O)] 1/2 

## = 85.49 L p 

## cfm Measured post

- te st leakage rate of the sampling train Md 

## lb./lb.

- mole Molecular weight of gas at the DGM Ms 

## lb./lb.

- mole Molecular weight of gas at the stack

# N OMENCLATURE

Symbol Units Description Mw 

## lb./lb.

- mole Molecular weight of water, = 18.0
manalyte 

## mg Mas s of analyte in the sample
n dimensionless Number of data points P MMBtu Fuel firing rate Pbar 

## inches Hg Barometric pressure at measurement site Pinput 

## tons/hour Process dry mass input rate p g 

## inches H 2

## O Gauge (static) pressure of stack gas Pm 

## inches Hg Absolute pressure of meter gases Ps 

## inches Hg Absolute pressure of stack gases Pstd 

## inches Hg Standard absolute pressure = 29.92 Q a 

## cfm Volumetric flow rate of actual stack gas Q sd 

## dscfm Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas, standardized R (in . Hg)(ft3 

## ) Ideal gas constant, (lb

- mole)(°R) = 21.85 RA percent Relative accuracy RE percent Removal efficiency RM ppm Average reference method concentration
rw 

## lb/mL Density of water, = 0.002201
ra 

## g/mL Density of acetone, = 0.7899 S d 

## dimens ionless Standard deviation T m 

## °R Absolute temperature of dry gas meter T s 

## °R Absolute temperature of stack gas T std 

## °R Standard absolute temperature, = 528 t0.975 

## dimensionless 2.5 percent error t

- value tm 

## °F Temperature of DGM ts 

## °F Temperature of stack gas

  minutes Total sampling time

# N OMENCLATURE

Symbol Units Description Vlc 

## mL Total volume of liquid collected V m 

## dcf Volume of gas sample as measured by the DGM V m(std) 

## dscf Volume of gas sample as measured by the DGM, standardized Vw(std) 

## scf Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, standardized
vs 

## ft./sec Velocity of stack gas Y m 

## dimensionless DGM calibration coefficient Y c 

## dimensionless DGM calibration check value Yw 

## dimensionless Reference (wet) gas meter calibration coeffici ent % CO 2 

## percent Percent CO 2 

## by volume, dry basis % O 2 

## percent Percent O 2 

## by volume, dry basis % N2 

## percent Percent N2 

## by volume, dry basis

# APPENDIX 

# D
FIELD 

# DATA

### Client: Location: Source: 0.954 Test Team: EPA Methods: D s

### (in.): % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### Start Run: End Run: Run Number: 1 4.0 3.9 

### *K-factor change

Meter Last tm 

### Filter Vacuum (dcf) Impinger Average Exit (in. Hg)

P6-01 Probe Assembly ID: D n

### (in.):

29.89 20.800 0.200 p g

### (in. H2

### O): 10.0

Temperature Readings (°F) Filter Inches H2

### O Baghouse No. 5 B-01

0.250 Sampling Box ID:

H Point ( p) 1/2 

### Test Date:

WLN, CS, RD 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A 59.0

8:00 AM

p Pbar

### (in. Hg):

ts 

### Minutes/Point: K-Factor: 2.0

2:40 PM Assumed B ws 

### :
-1.10 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Method 5, 26A Field Data Sheet

1.973 Novelis Greensboro, Georgia February 22, 2012

Ym

### / H @ 

### : C-008 Console ID:

25 1055.84 1.70 6.80 1.304 170 253 56 85 248 4.0 

### 26* 1070.92 1.20 4.68 1.095 166 255 57 86 249 3.0 

### 27 1084.03 1.00 3.90 1.000 169 256 57 86 250 3.0 

### 28 1095.31 0.88 3.43 0.938 173 264 57 85 251 2.0 

### 29 1106.11 0.71 2.77 0.843 170 260 58 85 252 2.0 

### 30 1116.00 0.57 2.22 0.755 164 269 60 85 254 2.0 1116.00 

### 31 1124.69 0.39 1.52 0.624 155 259 60 85 249 1.0 

### 32 1131.81 0.33 1.29 0.574 147 258 61 86 250 1.0 

### 33 1138.30 0.35 1.37 0.592 142 258 61 85 252 1.0 

### 34 1144.72 0.33 1.29 0.574 140 254 62 85 249 1.0 

### 35 1151.18 0.36 1.40 0.600 140 257 62 86 251 1.0 

### 36 1157.80 0.32 1.25 0.566 142 258 63 86 248 1.0 

### 38 1164.72 1.30 5.07 1.140 143 256 64 85 250 4.0 

### 39 1177.41 1.05 4.10 1.025 142 258 65 86 249 3.0 

### 40 1189.22 0.81 3.16 0.900 124 253 61 85 248 2.0 

### End 1199.616



### Theoretical maximum moisture collection at saturation (ml):

KR

## 1710.3 Total moisture collected (mL):

Post System Leak Check (cfm): 

## 90.0

0.006 Pre System Leak Check (cfm): 

## 0.003

### Client: Location: Source: 0.954 Test Team: EPA Methods: D s

### (in.): % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### Start Run: End Run: Run Number: 2

Meter Last tm 

### Filter Vacuum (dcf) Impinger Average Exit (in. Hg) 1 202.330 1.60 6.24 1.265 111 252 54 80 248 4.0 

### 2 215.99 1.50 5.85 1.225 117 256 52 81 249 3.0 

### 3 229.46 1.00 3.90 1.000 157 254 52 81 251 2.0 

### 4 240.13 0.85 3.32 0.922 162 256 52 81 250 2.0 

### 5 251.74 0.74 2.89 0.860 161 257 53 82 248 2.0 

### 6 261.67 0.63 2.46 0.794 158 254 54 82 250 2.0 

### p g

### (in. H2

### O):

Point p H ( p) 1/2 

### Filter D n

### (in.): 0.250

Temperature Readings (°F) 59.0

29.89 Assumed B ws 

### : 2.0 Pbar

### (in. Hg):

3.9 February 22, 2012 Test Date:

-1.10 Minutes/Point:

ts 

### 10.0

Inches H2

### O K-Factor: 20.800

3:10 PM 10:20 PM 0.200 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Method 5, 26A Field Data Sheet

Console ID: C-008 Greensboro, Georgia Novelis

P6-01 Ym

### / H @ 

### : Probe Assembly ID: WLN, CS, RD 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A 1.973 Sampling Box ID: B-01 Baghouse No. 5

6 261.67 0.63 2.46 0.794 158 254 54 82 250 2.0 

### 7 271.02 0.39 1.52 0.624 155 252 54 82 250 1.0 

### 8 278.69 0.34 1.33 0.583 157 256 55 83 251 1.0 

### 9 285.74 0.35 1.37 0.592 154 252 56 83 250 1.0 

### 10 292.77 0.32 1.25 0.566 155 258 56 84 252 1.0 

### 11 299.65 0.32 1.25 0.566 157 256 56 84 248 1.0 

### 12 306.82 0.30 1.17 0.548 151 259 57 85 250 1.0 

### 13 315.26 1.55 6.05 1.245 159 254 57 85 250 4.0 

### 14 330.98 1.20 4.68 1.095 162 259 56 86 251 3.0 

### 15 343.80 1.00 3.90 1.000 153 255 56 86 249 2.0 

### 16 355.42 0.71 2.77 0.843 145 253 57 86 250 2.0 

### 17 365.38 0.52 2.03 0.721 144 260 58 87 251 2.0 

### 18 374.28 0.48 1.87 0.693 129 261 58 87 249 2.0 

### 19 381.82 0.42 1.64 0.648 132 256 58 88 251 1.0 

### 20 389.15 0.49 1.91 0.700 136 258 59 88 248 1.0 

### 21 397.38 0.80 3.12 0.894 135 254 59 88 250 2.0 

### 22 407.47 0.80 3.12 0.894 116 259 60 88 251 2.0 

### 23 417.88 0.71 2.77 0.843 130 253 60 89 249 2.0 

### 24 427.59 0.65 2.54 0.806 137 251 61 89 251 2.0

### Client: Location: Source: 0.954 Test Team: EPA Methods: D s

### (in.): % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### Start Run: End Run: Run Number: 2

Meter Last tm 

### Filter Vacuum (dcf) Impinger Average Exit (in. Hg) p g

### (in. H2

### O):

Point p H ( p) 1/2 

### Filter D n

### (in.): 0.250

Temperature Readings (°F) 59.0

29.89 Assumed B ws 

### : 2.0 Pbar

### (in. Hg):

3.9 February 22, 2012 Test Date:

-1.10 Minutes/Point:

ts 

### 10.0

Inches H2

### O K-Factor: 20.800

3:10 PM 10:20 PM 0.200 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Method 5, 26A Field Data Sheet

Console ID: C-008 Greensboro, Georgia Novelis

P6-01 Ym

### / H @ 

### : Probe Assembly ID: WLN, CS, RD 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A 1.973 Sampling Box ID: B-01 Baghouse No. 5

25 434.82 1.60 6.24 1.265 134 264 58 90 253 4.0 

### 26 449.42 1.40 5.46 1.183 136 255 59 90 249 4.0 

### 27 463.11 1.10 4.29 1.049 142 253 57 88 248 3.0 

### 28 476.20 0.63 2.46 0.794 146 258 59 89 250 2.0 

### 29 485.37 0.55 2.15 0.742 139 256 54 90 251 2.0 

### 30 493.92 0.43 1.68 0.656 147 260 53 90 250 1.0 

### 31 501.68 0.38 1.48 0.616 151 254 54 90 252 1.0 

### 32 508.61 0.40 1.56 0.632 144 259 54 90 250 1.0 

### 33 515.31 0.62 2.42 0.787 156 257 55 89 251 2.0 

### 34 524.27 0.76 2.96 0.872 152 263 56 89 250 2.0 

### 35 534.14 0.64 2.50 0.800 149 255 56 88 249 2.0 

### 36 543.19 0.59 2.30 0.768 151 260 56 88 250 2.0 

### 37 550.13 1.45 5.66 1.204 146 258 51 86 252 4.0 

### 38 563.62 1.45 5.66 1.204 145 251 51 87 248 4.0 

### 39 577.03 0.96 3.74 0.980 149 256 52 88 250 3.0 

### 40 588.40 0.81 3.16 0.900 153 258 52 88 251 2.0 

### 41 599.12 0.69 2.69 0.831 156 254 53 88 250 2.0 

### 42 608.59 0.56 2.18 0.748 121 264 54 88 252 1.0 

### End 617.214



### Theoretical maximum moisture collection at saturation (ml):

KR

## 0.008 Pre System Leak Check (cfm): 

## 0.006 2360.1 Post System Leak Check (cfm): Total moisture collected (mL): 

## 93.1

### Client: Location: Source: 0.954 Test Team: EPA Methods: Ds (in.): % O2 % CO2 Start Run: End Run: Run Number: 3

Meter Last tm 

### Filter Vacuum (dcf) Impinger Average Exit (in. Hg) 1 617.614 1.20 4.68 1.095 117 259 62 65 250 3.0 

### 2 629.79 1.05 4.10 1.025 117 256 60 68 251 2.0 

### 3 641.32 0.88 3.43 0.938 138 261 60 75 252 2.0 

### 4 652.02 0.60 2.34 0.775 149 254 61 76 249 2.0 

### 5 661.03 0.42 1.64 0.648 157 262 59 78 252 1.0 

### 6 668.30 0.42 1.64 0.648 156 258 58 80 251 1.0 

### K-Factor:

ts 

### 3.9

Filter 10.0

Temperature Readings (°F) 3:30 PM

( p) 1/2 

### Point p H Dn (in.):

Minutes/Point:

Inches H2O 0.250 59.0

pg (in. H2O): 9:20 AM -1.10 0.000 20.900 29.84 Pbar (in. Hg): Assumed Bws: 2.0 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Method 5, 26A Field Data Sheet

Novelis Test Date: February 23, 2012

P6-01 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A B-01 Probe Assembly ID: Sampling Box ID: WLN, CS, RD Greensboro, Georgia C-008 Console ID: 1.973 Baghouse No. 5 Ym / DH@:

6 668.30 0.42 1.64 0.648 156 258 58 80 251 1.0 

### 7 675.88 0.75 2.93 0.866 153 258 60 81 252 2.0 

### 8 685.74 1.00 3.90 1.000 156 256 60 83 249 2.0 

### 9 697.34 1.00 3.90 1.000 160 264 61 86 253 2.0 

### 10 709.02 1.10 4.29 1.049 160 261 62 89 252 2.0 

### 11 721.06 0.68 2.65 0.825 161 258 63 90 250 2.0 

### 12 730.55 0.59 2.30 0.768 160 257 63 91 251 2.0 

### 13 739.56 1.80 7.02 1.342 166 256 61 92 250 5.0 

### 14 754.73 1.45 5.66 1.204 164 262 58 94 252 4.0 

### 15 768.61 1.10 4.29 1.049 165 257 54 95 249 3.0 

### 16 780.68 0.90 3.51 0.949 166 257 54 99 254 3.0 

### 17 791.92 0.93 3.63 0.964 167 261 55 99 252 3.0 

### 18 803.32 0.48 1.87 0.693 170 258 54 101 251 2.0 

### 19 811.20 0.30 1.17 0.548 169 257 57 100 250 1.0 

### 20 817.73 0.30 1.17 0.548 167 259 58 99 252 1.0 

### 21 823.72 0.34 1.33 0.583 173 264 58 97 259 1.0 

### 22 830.41 0.37 1.44 0.608 153 254 60 96 251 1.0 

### 23 837.64 0.33 1.29 0.574 152 262 61 96 252 1.0 

### 24 843.92 0.33 1.29 0.574 152 257 61 95 253 1.0

### Client: Location: Source: 0.954 Test Team: EPA Methods: Ds (in.): % O2 % CO2 Start Run: End Run: Run Number: 3

Meter Last tm 

### Filter Vacuum (dcf) Impinger Average Exit (in. Hg) K-Factor:

ts 

### 3.9

Filter 10.0

Temperature Readings (°F) 3:30 PM

( p) 1/2 

### Point p H Dn (in.):

Minutes/Point:

Inches H2O 0.250 59.0

pg (in. H2O): 9:20 AM -1.10 0.000 20.900 29.84 Pbar (in. Hg): Assumed Bws: 2.0 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Method 5, 26A Field Data Sheet

Novelis Test Date: February 23, 2012

P6-01 1, 2, 3A, 4, 26A B-01 Probe Assembly ID: Sampling Box ID: WLN, CS, RD Greensboro, Georgia C-008 Console ID: 1.973 Baghouse No. 5 Ym / DH@:

25 850.59 1.50 5.85 1.225 169 260 59 94 253 4.0 

### 26 864.09 1.60 6.24 1.265 180 250 61 95 252 5.0 

### 27 878.30 1.20 4.68 1.095 175 259 62 96 253 3.0 

### 28 891.15 1.05 4.10 1.025 172 254 57 97 254 3.0 

### 29 903.07 0.84 3.28 0.917 170 264 57 97 252 2.0 

### 30 914.03 0.51 1.99 0.714 173 257 58 98 252 2.0 

### 31 922.61 0.33 1.29 0.574 175 259 60 98 254 1.0 

### 32 929.38 0.35 1.37 0.592 170 267 61 98 251 1.0 

### 33 936.08 0.37 1.44 0.608 162 259 61 98 250 1.0 

### 34 943.27 0.35 1.37 0.592 160 257 61 99 251 1.0 

### 35 950.31 0.35 1.37 0.592 158 263 61 99 253 1.0 

### 36 957.32 0.27 1.05 0.520 141 263 62 100 253 1.0 

### End 963.547



### Theoretical maximum moisture collection at saturation (ml): Post System Leak Check (cfm): 

## 0.002 Pre System Leak Check (cfm): 

## 0.002 3198.0 141.7 Total moisture collected (mL):

## Client: Date: Location: D s

## (in.): Source: A s

## (ft2

## ): Test Team: D n

## (in.): Probe ID: A n

## (ft2

## ): C p 

## :
tm 

## (°F): p Console ID: (in. H2

## O) (degrees) Ym 

## : 1 0.0 0.0 H @ 

## : 2 0.0 0.0 Assumed B ws 

## : 3 0.0 0.0 Pbar

## (in. Hg): 4 0.0 2.0 5 0.0 4.0 6 0.0 0.0 7 0.0 5.0 8 0.0 2.0 9 0.0 0.0 Greensboro, Georgia 59.0 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Cyclonic Flow Absence Verification Field Data EPA Method 1

Novelis February 22, 2012

18.99 Baghouse No. 5

0.84

C-008 70 P6-01 0.000341

1.973 9.540
2% Point WLN, CS, RD 0.250

29.89

9 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 11 0.0 2.0 12 0.0 0.0
1 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 2.0 4 0.0 0.0 5 0.0 6.0 6 0.0 5.0 7 0.0 0.0 8 0.0 2.0 9 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 4.0 11 0.0 0.0 12 0.0 2.0 Change Ports

## Client: Date: Location: Test Team: Source:
D n

## (in.): p ts 

## A n

## (ft2

## ): (in. H2

## O) (°F) D s

## (in.): 1 1.40 113 A s

## (ft2

## ): 2 1.10 108 Length A (in.): 3 0.85 110 Length B (in.): 4 0.66 114 tamb

## (°F): 5 0.52 111 Assumed B ws 

## : 6 0.50 116 Pbar

## (in. Hg): 7 0.37 120 Pg

## (in. H2

## O): 8 0.46 118 % O 2 

## : 9 0.54 119 % CO 2 

## : 10 0.82 121 Console ID: 11 0.74 126 Y: 12 0.69 128 H @ 

## : 9.540

0.84 1.973 Point 

# Advanced Industrial Resources, Inc. Source Description Sheets

Baghouse No. 5 Novelis February 22, 2012 Greensboro, Georgia WLN, CS, RD

59.0 0.250

29.89

C-008 20.00% 84 0.000341

18.99
180
2%

20.8%

Change Ports 60

-1.10

H @ 

## : C p 

## : 1 2.00 126 K-Factor: 2 1.55 120 3 1.00 129 4 0.88 134 5 0.71 137 6 0.60 143 7 0.33 142 8 0.35 141 9 0.35 150 10 0.32 154 11 0.30 154 12 0.32 160< A= >< B= > 

## Sampling Location 0.84 1.973
4.0 Change Ports

Sketch of Stack Digital Photograph of Source Not Available

# 59.0 Inch Diameter Stack 

# Traverse Point Locations
Baghouse No. 5 Novelis for

59.0 Inch Diameter Stack Two Ports at 90 0


# Sampling Point 1 1.2 2 4.0 3 7.0 4 10.4 5 14.8 6 21.0 7 38.0 8 44.3 9 48.6 10 52.0 11 55.0 12 57.8 Distance from Stack Wall (inches)

# APPENDIX 

# E
LABORATORY 

# REPORT S

# APPENDIX 

# F CALIBRATION 

# DATA

# APPENDIX 

# G
PROCESS 

# O PERATION 

# DATA

### Test Ave. Start time 2/22/2012 8:00 2/22/2012 15:10 2/23/2012 9:20 End Time 2/22/2012 14:40 2/22/2012 22:20 2/23/2012 15:30 Cast ID 120222C 120222E 120223C FCE 3 Inputs Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 RSI/Prime (lbs) 9534 8172 0 5,902 Uncoated Manual Charge Scrap (lbs) 37138 43080 47602 42,607 Decoated UBC (lbs) 0 0 0 0 Coated Scrap (lbs) 32,243 43,758 20,732 32,244 Total Aluminum Input 78,915 95,010 68,334 80,753 Salt: A103-2 (51.58% Chloride) 2102 2354 2487 Salt: Amlox 371 (55.52% Chloride) 0 0 0 Total Salt Input 2102 2354 2487 2314 Total Available Chloride 1084 1214 1283 1194 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test Ave. Total Production Output FCE 1 inches transferred 12.9 0.0 8.5 FCE 2 inches transferred 6.9 13.4 12.8 FCE 3 inches transferred 10.8 12.9 11.2 Cast Weight (lbs) 247600 214400 214700 FCE 3 Total Output Production (lbs) 87388 105162 73989 88846

Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test Ave. Baghouse Ave. Inlet Temperature ('F) 154 143 192 163 Lime Feed Rate (Hz) 12 12 12 12 February 22 - 23, 2012

### Volume Transferred
Time Event Melter units " Holder Units lbs Cast ID Product Melter Weight Production lbs
2/22/2012 0400 FCE1 xfer to holder 8.6 2/22/2012 0400 FCE2 xfer to holder 13.4 2/22/2012 0408 FCE3 xfer to holder 8 2/22/2012 0640 Holder Cast 215100 120222A 3104 2/22/2012 0745 FCE3 xfer to holder 6.5 44595 2/22/2012 0800 start 1st sample run 2/22/2012 0953 FCE2 xfer to holder 13.7 93994 2/22/2012 1000 FCE1 xfer to holder 10.7 73411 2/22/2012 1304 Holder Cast 212000 120222B 3104 2/22/2012 1435 FCE3 xfer to holder 10.8 87388 2/22/2012 1440 end 1st sample run 87,388 FCE3 production 1st run, lbs 2/22/2012 1457 FCE2 xfer to holder 2 16183 2/22/2012 1510 start 2nd sample run 2/22/2012 1607 FCE1 xfer to holder 12.9 104380 2/22/2012 1623 FCE2 xfer to holder 4.9 39648 2/22/2012 1741 Holder Cast 32400 120222C 3104 2/22/2012 2158 Holder Cast 215200 120222D 3104 2/22/2012 2205 FCE3 xfer to holder 12.9 105162 2/22/2012 2220 end 2nd sample run 105,162 FCE3 production 2nd run, lbs 2/22/2012 2225 FCE2 xfer to holder 12.5 101901 2/22/2012 2321 FCE2 xfer to holder 0.9 7337 2/23/2012 0139 Holder Cast 214400 120222E 3104 2/23/2012 0424 FCE2 xfer to holder 13 2/23/2012 0425 FCE1 xfer to holder 11 2/23/2012 0430 FCE3 xfer to holder 4.1 2/23/2012 0648 Holder Cast 213700 120223A 3104 2/23/2012 0845 FCE3 xfer to holder 4.3 2/23/2012 0920 start 3rd sample run 2/23/2012 1056 FCE2 xfer to holder 13 2/23/2012 1100 FCE1 xfer to holder 11.2 2/23/2012 1319 Holder Cast 211600 120223B 3104 2/23/2012 1525 FCE1 xfer to holder 8.5 56152 2/23/2012 1525 FCE3 xfer to holder 11.2 73989 2/23/2012 1530 FCE2 xfer to holder 12.8 84559 2/23/2012 1530 end 3rd sample run 73,989 FCE3 production 3rd run, lbs

### 2/23/2012 1750 Holder Cast 214700 120223C 3104

### Baghouse 5 Emissions Tests February 22 - 23, 2011
Test Run Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Start Time End Time Inputs (lbs) RSI/Prime 9534 8172 0 Uncoated Scrap 37138 43080 47602 Decoated UBC 0 0 0 Coated Scrap 32243 43758 20732 Total Aluminum Input 78915 95010 68334 Salt A103-2 2102 2354 2487 Amlox 371 0 0 0

FCE3 inches transferred 10.8 12.9 11.2

Total coated: 32243 Furnace #3 sidewell scrap lbs Total uncoated: 37138 Class1 1070 

### Class2 37138 0 10748 21495 28258 10748 21495 8880
Total coated: 43758 2/22/12 10:20 PM 2/23/12 3:30 PM

Run 1 Metal Input Batches

Run 2 Metal Input Batches 2/22/12 8:00 AM 2/22/12 3:10 PM 2/23/12 9:20 AM 2/22/12 2:40 PM

Total coated: 43758 Furnace #3 sidewell scrap lbs Total uncoated: 43080 Class1 Class2 1070 43080 43758 1200 

### 17040 32658 1200 

### 5220 11100 

### 5100 5170 5300 5250

Total coated: 

### 20732 Furnace #3 sidewell scrap lbs Total uncoated: 47602 Class1 EC Wire 

### 1070 

### Class2 42160 5442 0 20732 

### 42160 2712 5250 2383 5120 347 5216 5146 Run 3 Metal Input Batches Run 2 Metal Input BatchesBag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

153.75 2/22/12 8:00 AM 112 153.65 143.27 2/22/12 3:10 PM 115 143.21 192.39 2/23/12 9:20 AM 124 192.25 2/22/12 8:01 AM 112 2/22/12 3:11 PM 114 2/23/12 9:21 AM 125 2/22/12 8:02 AM 111 2/22/12 3:12 PM 114 2/23/12 9:22 AM 126 2/22/12 8:03 AM 109 2/22/12 3:13 PM 115 2/23/12 9:23 AM 126 2/22/12 8:04 AM 108 2/22/12 3:14 PM 116 2/23/12 9:24 AM 127 2/22/12 8:05 AM 106 2/22/12 3:15 PM 117 2/23/12 9:25 AM 128 2/22/12 8:06 AM 105 2/22/12 3:16 PM 119 2/23/12 9:26 AM 128 2/22/12 8:07 AM 105 2/22/12 3:17 PM 121 2/23/12 9:27 AM 129 2/22/12 8:08 AM 104 2/22/12 3:18 PM 122 2/23/12 9:28 AM 129 2/22/12 8:09 AM 103 2/22/12 3:19 PM 123 2/23/12 9:29 AM 129 2/22/12 8:10 AM 101 2/22/12 3:20 PM 124 2/23/12 9:30 AM 130 2/22/12 8:11 AM 101 2/22/12 3:21 PM 124 2/23/12 9:31 AM 130 2/22/12 8:12 AM 100 2/22/12 3:22 PM 124 2/23/12 9:32 AM 129 2/22/12 8:13 AM 99 2/22/12 3:23 PM 124 2/23/12 9:33 AM 128 2/22/12 8:14 AM 98 2/22/12 3:24 PM 125 2/23/12 9:34 AM 129 2/22/12 8:15 AM 98 2/22/12 3:25 PM 127 2/23/12 9:35 AM 129 2/22/12 8:16 AM 97 2/22/12 3:26 PM 129 2/23/12 9:36 AM 130 2/22/12 8:17 AM 97 2/22/12 3:27 PM 132 2/23/12 9:37 AM 130 2/22/12 8:18 AM 99 2/22/12 3:28 PM 135 2/23/12 9:38 AM 130 2/22/12 8:19 AM 100 2/22/12 3:29 PM 139 2/23/12 9:39 AM 131 2/22/12 8:20 AM 102 2/22/12 3:30 PM 142 2/23/12 9:40 AM 132 2/22/12 8:21 AM 103 2/22/12 3:31 PM 145 2/23/12 9:41 AM 134 2/22/12 8:22 AM 104 2/22/12 3:32 PM 148 2/23/12 9:42 AM 137 2/22/12 8:23 AM 105 2/22/12 3:33 PM 151 2/23/12 9:43 AM 139 2/22/12 8:24 AM 105 2/22/12 3:34 PM 154 2/23/12 9:44 AM 141 2/22/12 8:25 AM 105 2/22/12 3:35 PM 156 2/23/12 9:45 AM 143 2/22/12 8:26 AM 104 2/22/12 3:36 PM 158 2/23/12 9:46 AM 145 2/22/12 8:27 AM 104 2/22/12 3:37 PM 160 2/23/12 9:47 AM 147 2/22/12 8:28 AM 103 2/22/12 3:38 PM 162 2/23/12 9:48 AM 149 2/22/12 8:29 AM 102 2/22/12 3:39 PM 164 2/23/12 9:49 AM 150 2/22/12 8:30 AM 102 2/22/12 3:40 PM 165 2/23/12 9:50 AM 151 2/22/12 8:31 AM 101 2/22/12 3:41 PM 166 2/23/12 9:51 AM 153 2/22/12 8:32 AM 100 2/22/12 3:42 PM 167 2/23/12 9:52 AM 155 2/22/12 8:33 AM 100 2/22/12 3:43 PM 168 2/23/12 9:53 AM 156 2/22/12 8:34 AM 99 2/22/12 3:44 PM 169 2/23/12 9:54 AM 158 2/22/12 8:35 AM 98 2/22/12 3:45 PM 170 2/23/12 9:55 AM 159 2/22/12 8:36 AM 98 2/22/12 3:46 PM 170 2/23/12 9:56 AM 160 2/22/12 8:37 AM 97 2/22/12 3:47 PM 171 2/23/12 9:57 AM 161 2/22/12 8:38 AM 96 2/22/12 3:48 PM 172 2/23/12 9:58 AM 162 2/22/12 8:39 AM 96 2/22/12 3:49 PM 172 2/23/12 9:59 AM 163 2/22/12 8:40 AM 96 2/22/12 3:50 PM 173 2/23/12 10:00 AM 164 2/22/12 8:41 AM 95 2/22/12 3:51 PM 173 2/23/12 10:01 AM 165 2/22/12 8:41 AM 2/22/12 3:51 PM 2/23/12 10:01 AM 2/22/12 8:42 AM 94 2/22/12 3:52 PM 174 2/23/12 10:02 AM 166 2/22/12 8:43 AM 95 2/22/12 3:53 PM 174 2/23/12 10:03 AM 167 2/22/12 8:44 AM 96 2/22/12 3:54 PM 175 2/23/12 10:04 AM 168 2/22/12 8:45 AM 97 2/22/12 3:55 PM 175 2/23/12 10:05 AM 169 2/22/12 8:46 AM 99 2/22/12 3:56 PM 175 2/23/12 10:06 AM 170 2/22/12 8:47 AM 101 2/22/12 3:57 PM 176 2/23/12 10:07 AM 170 2/22/12 8:48 AM 103 2/22/12 3:58 PM 176 2/23/12 10:08 AM 171 2/22/12 8:49 AM 104 2/22/12 3:59 PM 176 2/23/12 10:09 AM 171 2/22/12 8:50 AM 104 2/22/12 4:00 PM 177 2/23/12 10:10 AM 172 2/22/12 8:51 AM 104 2/22/12 4:01 PM 177 2/23/12 10:11 AM 173 2/22/12 8:52 AM 103 2/22/12 4:02 PM 177 2/23/12 10:12 AM 173 2/22/12 8:53 AM 103 2/22/12 4:03 PM 177 2/23/12 10:13 AM 174 2/22/12 8:54 AM 102 2/22/12 4:04 PM 177 2/23/12 10:14 AM 175 2/22/12 8:55 AM 101 2/22/12 4:05 PM 178 2/23/12 10:15 AM 175 2/22/12 8:56 AM 101 2/22/12 4:06 PM 178 2/23/12 10:16 AM 174 2/22/12 8:57 AM 100 2/22/12 4:07 PM 178 2/23/12 10:17 AM 173 2/22/12 8:58 AM 100 2/22/12 4:08 PM 178 2/23/12 10:18 AM 172 2/22/12 8:59 AM 99 2/22/12 4:09 PM 178 2/23/12 10:19 AM 172 2/22/12 9:00 AM 98 2/22/12 4:10 PM 178 2/23/12 10:20 AM 171 2/22/12 9:01 AM 97 2/22/12 4:11 PM 178 2/23/12 10:21 AM 171 2/22/12 9:02 AM 96 2/22/12 4:12 PM 178 2/23/12 10:22 AM 171 2/22/12 9:03 AM 96 2/22/12 4:13 PM 178 2/23/12 10:23 AM 171 2/22/12 9:04 AM 96 2/22/12 4:14 PM 177 2/23/12 10:24 AM 172 2/22/12 9:05 AM 96 2/22/12 4:15 PM 177 2/23/12 10:25 AM 173 2/22/12 9:06 AM 97 2/22/12 4:16 PM 177 2/23/12 10:26 AM 174 2/22/12 9:07 AM 99 2/22/12 4:17 PM 176 2/23/12 10:27 AM 175 2/22/12 9:08 AM 100 2/22/12 4:18 PM 176 2/23/12 10:28 AM 175 2/22/12 9:09 AM 100 2/22/12 4:19 PM 175 2/23/12 10:29 AM 176 2/22/12 9:10 AM 101 2/22/12 4:20 PM 175 2/23/12 10:30 AM 177 2/22/12 9:11 AM 101 2/22/12 4:21 PM 175 2/23/12 10:31 AM 178 2/22/12 9:12 AM 102 2/22/12 4:22 PM 174 2/23/12 10:32 AM 179 2/22/12 9:13 AM 102 2/22/12 4:23 PM 174 2/23/12 10:33 AM 180 2/22/12 9:14 AM 102 2/22/12 4:24 PM 175 2/23/12 10:34 AM 181 2/22/12 9:15 AM 101 2/22/12 4:25 PM 175 2/23/12 10:35 AM 182 2/22/12 9:16 AM 100 2/22/12 4:26 PM 175 2/23/12 10:36 AM 183 2/22/12 9:17 AM 100 2/22/12 4:27 PM 177 2/23/12 10:37 AM 185 2/22/12 9:18 AM 100 2/22/12 4:28 PM 179 2/23/12 10:38 AM 186 2/22/12 9:19 AM 100 2/22/12 4:29 PM 180 2/23/12 10:39 AM 186 2/22/12 9:20 AM 101 2/22/12 4:30 PM 180 2/23/12 10:40 AM 187 2/22/12 9:21 AM 101 2/22/12 4:31 PM 180 2/23/12 10:41 AM 188 2/22/12 9:22 AM 102 2/22/12 4:32 PM 179 2/23/12 10:42 AM 189 2/22/12 9:23 AM 103 2/22/12 4:33 PM 179 2/23/12 10:43 AM 189 2/22/12 9:24 AM 105 2/22/12 4:34 PM 179 2/23/12 10:44 AM 190Bag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

2/22/12 9:25 AM 108 2/22/12 4:35 PM 179 2/23/12 10:45 AM 191 2/22/12 9:26 AM 110 2/22/12 4:36 PM 179 2/23/12 10:46 AM 191 2/22/12 9:27 AM 112 2/22/12 4:37 PM 179 2/23/12 10:47 AM 191 2/22/12 9:28 AM 114 2/22/12 4:38 PM 179 2/23/12 10:48 AM 191 2/22/12 9:29 AM 116 2/22/12 4:39 PM 179 2/23/12 10:49 AM 192 2/22/12 9:30 AM 117 2/22/12 4:40 PM 180 2/23/12 10:50 AM 192 2/22/12 9:31 AM 119 2/22/12 4:41 PM 180 2/23/12 10:51 AM 193 2/22/12 9:32 AM 121 2/22/12 4:42 PM 179 2/23/12 10:52 AM 194 2/22/12 9:33 AM 123 2/22/12 4:43 PM 179 2/23/12 10:53 AM 194 2/22/12 9:34 AM 125 2/22/12 4:44 PM 178 2/23/12 10:54 AM 195 2/22/12 9:35 AM 126 2/22/12 4:45 PM 178 2/23/12 10:55 AM 195 2/22/12 9:36 AM 128 2/22/12 4:46 PM 178 2/23/12 10:56 AM 196 2/22/12 9:37 AM 130 2/22/12 4:47 PM 177 2/23/12 10:57 AM 196 2/22/12 9:38 AM 131 2/22/12 4:48 PM 177 2/23/12 10:58 AM 196 2/22/12 9:39 AM 133 2/22/12 4:49 PM 177 2/23/12 10:59 AM 197 2/22/12 9:40 AM 134 2/22/12 4:50 PM 177 2/23/12 11:00 AM 197 2/22/12 9:41 AM 134 2/22/12 4:51 PM 176 2/23/12 11:01 AM 198 2/22/12 9:42 AM 135 2/22/12 4:52 PM 175 2/23/12 11:02 AM 199 2/22/12 9:43 AM 136 2/22/12 4:53 PM 174 2/23/12 11:03 AM 199 2/22/12 9:44 AM 136 2/22/12 4:54 PM 171 2/23/12 11:04 AM 200 2/22/12 9:45 AM 136 2/22/12 4:55 PM 169 2/23/12 11:05 AM 200 2/22/12 9:46 AM 137 2/22/12 4:56 PM 166 2/23/12 11:06 AM 202 2/22/12 9:47 AM 137 2/22/12 4:57 PM 164 2/23/12 11:07 AM 202 2/22/12 9:48 AM 138 2/22/12 4:58 PM 161 2/23/12 11:08 AM 202 2/22/12 9:49 AM 138 2/22/12 4:59 PM 158 2/23/12 11:09 AM 202 2/22/12 9:50 AM 138 2/22/12 5:00 PM 157 2/23/12 11:10 AM 201 2/22/12 9:51 AM 139 2/22/12 5:01 PM 156 2/23/12 11:11 AM 199 2/22/12 9:52 AM 138 2/22/12 5:02 PM 155 2/23/12 11:12 AM 197 2/22/12 9:53 AM 136 2/22/12 5:03 PM 155 2/23/12 11:13 AM 195 2/22/12 9:54 AM 134 2/22/12 5:04 PM 155 2/23/12 11:14 AM 193 2/22/12 9:55 AM 132 2/22/12 5:05 PM 156 2/23/12 11:15 AM 192 2/22/12 9:56 AM 129 2/22/12 5:06 PM 156 2/23/12 11:16 AM 192 2/22/12 9:57 AM 127 2/22/12 5:07 PM 157 2/23/12 11:17 AM 193 2/22/12 9:58 AM 125 2/22/12 5:08 PM 157 2/23/12 11:18 AM 193 2/22/12 9:59 AM 123 2/22/12 5:09 PM 158 2/23/12 11:19 AM 194 2/22/12 10:00 AM 123 2/22/12 5:10 PM 158 2/23/12 11:20 AM 195 2/22/12 10:01 AM 124 2/22/12 5:11 PM 158 2/23/12 11:21 AM 195 2/22/12 10:02 AM 125 2/22/12 5:12 PM 158 2/23/12 11:22 AM 196 2/22/12 10:03 AM 125 2/22/12 5:13 PM 159 2/23/12 11:23 AM 197 2/22/12 10:04 AM 126 2/22/12 5:14 PM 159 2/23/12 11:24 AM 198 2/22/12 10:05 AM 127 2/22/12 5:15 PM 159 2/23/12 11:25 AM 199 2/22/12 10:06 AM 128 2/22/12 5:16 PM 159 2/23/12 11:26 AM 199 2/22/12 10:06 AM 2/22/12 5:16 PM 2/23/12 11:26 AM 2/22/12 10:07 AM 128 2/22/12 5:17 PM 160 2/23/12 11:27 AM 200 2/22/12 10:08 AM 129 2/22/12 5:18 PM 160 2/23/12 11:28 AM 201 2/22/12 10:09 AM 130 2/22/12 5:19 PM 161 2/23/12 11:29 AM 201 2/22/12 10:10 AM 130 2/22/12 5:20 PM 161 2/23/12 11:30 AM 202 2/22/12 10:11 AM 130 2/22/12 5:21 PM 162 2/23/12 11:31 AM 203 2/22/12 10:12 AM 129 2/22/12 5:22 PM 162 2/23/12 11:32 AM 203 2/22/12 10:13 AM 127 2/22/12 5:23 PM 163 2/23/12 11:33 AM 204 2/22/12 10:14 AM 126 2/22/12 5:24 PM 163 2/23/12 11:34 AM 205 2/22/12 10:15 AM 124 2/22/12 5:25 PM 164 2/23/12 11:35 AM 205 2/22/12 10:16 AM 122 2/22/12 5:26 PM 165 2/23/12 11:36 AM 205 2/22/12 10:17 AM 120 2/22/12 5:27 PM 166 2/23/12 11:37 AM 205 2/22/12 10:18 AM 119 2/22/12 5:28 PM 165 2/23/12 11:38 AM 206 2/22/12 10:19 AM 119 2/22/12 5:29 PM 164 2/23/12 11:39 AM 206 2/22/12 10:20 AM 118 2/22/12 5:30 PM 162 2/23/12 11:40 AM 206 2/22/12 10:21 AM 119 2/22/12 5:31 PM 160 2/23/12 11:41 AM 207 2/22/12 10:22 AM 120 2/22/12 5:32 PM 159 2/23/12 11:42 AM 207 2/22/12 10:23 AM 122 2/22/12 5:33 PM 156 2/23/12 11:43 AM 208 2/22/12 10:24 AM 123 2/22/12 5:34 PM 154 2/23/12 11:44 AM 208 2/22/12 10:25 AM 125 2/22/12 5:35 PM 152 2/23/12 11:45 AM 209 2/22/12 10:26 AM 126 2/22/12 5:36 PM 150 2/23/12 11:46 AM 208 2/22/12 10:27 AM 128 2/22/12 5:37 PM 148 2/23/12 11:47 AM 207 2/22/12 10:28 AM 129 2/22/12 5:38 PM 146 2/23/12 11:48 AM 205 2/22/12 10:29 AM 131 2/22/12 5:39 PM 144 2/23/12 11:49 AM 205 2/22/12 10:30 AM 132 2/22/12 5:40 PM 143 2/23/12 11:50 AM 204 2/22/12 10:31 AM 133 2/22/12 5:41 PM 143 2/23/12 11:51 AM 204 2/22/12 10:32 AM 134 2/22/12 5:42 PM 144 2/23/12 11:52 AM 204 2/22/12 10:33 AM 135 2/22/12 5:43 PM 145 2/23/12 11:53 AM 204 2/22/12 10:34 AM 134 2/22/12 5:44 PM 146 2/23/12 11:54 AM 205 2/22/12 10:35 AM 133 2/22/12 5:45 PM 147 2/23/12 11:55 AM 205 2/22/12 10:36 AM 132 2/22/12 5:46 PM 149 2/23/12 11:56 AM 205 2/22/12 10:37 AM 131 2/22/12 5:47 PM 150 2/23/12 11:57 AM 206 2/22/12 10:38 AM 131 2/22/12 5:48 PM 151 2/23/12 11:58 AM 206 2/22/12 10:39 AM 132 2/22/12 5:49 PM 152 2/23/12 11:59 AM 206 2/22/12 10:40 AM 132 2/22/12 5:50 PM 153 2/23/12 12:00 PM 207 2/22/12 10:41 AM 134 2/22/12 5:51 PM 154 2/23/12 12:01 PM 207 2/22/12 10:42 AM 136 2/22/12 5:52 PM 155 2/23/12 12:02 PM 208 2/22/12 10:43 AM 137 2/22/12 5:53 PM 156 2/23/12 12:03 PM 208 2/22/12 10:44 AM 138 2/22/12 5:54 PM 157 2/23/12 12:04 PM 209 2/22/12 10:45 AM 140 2/22/12 5:55 PM 157 2/23/12 12:05 PM 209 2/22/12 10:46 AM 141 2/22/12 5:56 PM 158 2/23/12 12:06 PM 210 2/22/12 10:47 AM 143 2/22/12 5:57 PM 159 2/23/12 12:07 PM 210 2/22/12 10:48 AM 144 2/22/12 5:58 PM 159 2/23/12 12:08 PM 211 2/22/12 10:49 AM 145 2/22/12 5:59 PM 159 2/23/12 12:09 PM 211Bag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

2/22/12 10:50 AM 147 2/22/12 6:00 PM 159 2/23/12 12:10 PM 212 2/22/12 10:51 AM 148 2/22/12 6:01 PM 157 2/23/12 12:11 PM 212 2/22/12 10:52 AM 149 2/22/12 6:02 PM 155 2/23/12 12:12 PM 213 2/22/12 10:53 AM 150 2/22/12 6:03 PM 153 2/23/12 12:13 PM 213 2/22/12 10:54 AM 152 2/22/12 6:04 PM 151 2/23/12 12:14 PM 214 2/22/12 10:55 AM 153 2/22/12 6:05 PM 148 2/23/12 12:15 PM 214 2/22/12 10:56 AM 155 2/22/12 6:06 PM 146 2/23/12 12:16 PM 214 2/22/12 10:57 AM 156 2/22/12 6:07 PM 144 2/23/12 12:17 PM 214 2/22/12 10:58 AM 157 2/22/12 6:08 PM 141 2/23/12 12:18 PM 213 2/22/12 10:59 AM 158 2/22/12 6:09 PM 140 2/23/12 12:19 PM 212 2/22/12 11:00 AM 160 2/22/12 6:10 PM 140 2/23/12 12:20 PM 210 2/22/12 11:01 AM 160 2/22/12 6:11 PM 140 2/23/12 12:21 PM 210 2/22/12 11:02 AM 161 2/22/12 6:12 PM 140 2/23/12 12:22 PM 210 2/22/12 11:03 AM 162 2/22/12 6:13 PM 141 2/23/12 12:23 PM 209 2/22/12 11:04 AM 163 2/22/12 6:14 PM 142 2/23/12 12:24 PM 209 2/22/12 11:05 AM 164 2/22/12 6:15 PM 143 2/23/12 12:25 PM 209 2/22/12 11:06 AM 165 2/22/12 6:16 PM 144 2/23/12 12:26 PM 209 2/22/12 11:07 AM 166 2/22/12 6:17 PM 145 2/23/12 12:27 PM 210 2/22/12 11:08 AM 166 2/22/12 6:18 PM 146 2/23/12 12:28 PM 210 2/22/12 11:09 AM 167 2/22/12 6:19 PM 147 2/23/12 12:29 PM 211 2/22/12 11:10 AM 168 2/22/12 6:20 PM 148 2/23/12 12:30 PM 212 2/22/12 11:11 AM 169 2/22/12 6:21 PM 149 2/23/12 12:31 PM 212 2/22/12 11:12 AM 169 2/22/12 6:22 PM 149 2/23/12 12:32 PM 213 2/22/12 11:13 AM 169 2/22/12 6:23 PM 150 2/23/12 12:33 PM 213 2/22/12 11:14 AM 170 2/22/12 6:24 PM 150 2/23/12 12:34 PM 213 2/22/12 11:15 AM 170 2/22/12 6:25 PM 151 2/23/12 12:35 PM 214 2/22/12 11:16 AM 170 2/22/12 6:26 PM 152 2/23/12 12:36 PM 214 2/22/12 11:17 AM 171 2/22/12 6:27 PM 152 2/23/12 12:37 PM 214 2/22/12 11:18 AM 171 2/22/12 6:28 PM 153 2/23/12 12:38 PM 214 2/22/12 11:19 AM 173 2/22/12 6:29 PM 153 2/23/12 12:39 PM 214 2/22/12 11:20 AM 174 2/22/12 6:30 PM 154 2/23/12 12:40 PM 214 2/22/12 11:21 AM 174 2/22/12 6:31 PM 154 2/23/12 12:41 PM 215 2/22/12 11:22 AM 174 2/22/12 6:32 PM 155 2/23/12 12:42 PM 215 2/22/12 11:23 AM 174 2/22/12 6:33 PM 155 2/23/12 12:43 PM 215 2/22/12 11:24 AM 175 2/22/12 6:34 PM 156 2/23/12 12:44 PM 214 2/22/12 11:25 AM 175 2/22/12 6:35 PM 156 2/23/12 12:45 PM 214 2/22/12 11:26 AM 176 2/22/12 6:36 PM 156 2/23/12 12:46 PM 214 2/22/12 11:27 AM 177 2/22/12 6:37 PM 156 2/23/12 12:47 PM 213 2/22/12 11:28 AM 178 2/22/12 6:38 PM 156 2/23/12 12:48 PM 210 2/22/12 11:29 AM 179 2/22/12 6:39 PM 155 2/23/12 12:49 PM 208 2/22/12 11:30 AM 181 2/22/12 6:40 PM 153 2/23/12 12:50 PM 205 2/22/12 11:31 AM 183 2/22/12 6:41 PM 151 2/23/12 12:51 PM 203 2/22/12 11:31 AM 2/22/12 6:41 PM 2/23/12 12:51 PM 2/22/12 11:32 AM 184 2/22/12 6:42 PM 149 2/23/12 12:52 PM 200 2/22/12 11:33 AM 185 2/22/12 6:43 PM 146 2/23/12 12:53 PM 198 2/22/12 11:34 AM 186 2/22/12 6:44 PM 144 2/23/12 12:54 PM 195 2/22/12 11:35 AM 186 2/22/12 6:45 PM 141 2/23/12 12:55 PM 194 2/22/12 11:36 AM 187 2/22/12 6:46 PM 139 2/23/12 12:56 PM 192 2/22/12 11:37 AM 187 2/22/12 6:47 PM 137 2/23/12 12:57 PM 191 2/22/12 11:38 AM 188 2/22/12 6:48 PM 135 2/23/12 12:58 PM 189 2/22/12 11:39 AM 189 2/22/12 6:49 PM 133 2/23/12 12:59 PM 188 2/22/12 11:40 AM 190 2/22/12 6:50 PM 131 2/23/12 1:00 PM 188 2/22/12 11:41 AM 190 2/22/12 6:51 PM 130 2/23/12 1:01 PM 187 2/22/12 11:42 AM 191 2/22/12 6:52 PM 129 2/23/12 1:02 PM 186 2/22/12 11:43 AM 191 2/22/12 6:53 PM 129 2/23/12 1:03 PM 184 2/22/12 11:44 AM 191 2/22/12 6:54 PM 129 2/23/12 1:04 PM 184 2/22/12 11:45 AM 191 2/22/12 6:55 PM 130 2/23/12 1:05 PM 183 2/22/12 11:46 AM 192 2/22/12 6:56 PM 132 2/23/12 1:06 PM 182 2/22/12 11:47 AM 193 2/22/12 6:57 PM 133 2/23/12 1:07 PM 182 2/22/12 11:48 AM 193 2/22/12 6:58 PM 135 2/23/12 1:08 PM 181 2/22/12 11:49 AM 194 2/22/12 6:59 PM 136 2/23/12 1:09 PM 180 2/22/12 11:50 AM 194 2/22/12 7:00 PM 138 2/23/12 1:10 PM 180 2/22/12 11:51 AM 195 2/22/12 7:01 PM 140 2/23/12 1:11 PM 179 2/22/12 11:52 AM 196 2/22/12 7:02 PM 141 2/23/12 1:12 PM 179 2/22/12 11:53 AM 196 2/22/12 7:03 PM 143 2/23/12 1:13 PM 179 2/22/12 11:54 AM 197 2/22/12 7:04 PM 144 2/23/12 1:14 PM 178 2/22/12 11:55 AM 198 2/22/12 7:05 PM 145 2/23/12 1:15 PM 178 2/22/12 11:56 AM 199 2/22/12 7:06 PM 146 2/23/12 1:16 PM 178 2/22/12 11:57 AM 199 2/22/12 7:07 PM 146 2/23/12 1:17 PM 178 2/22/12 11:58 AM 200 2/22/12 7:08 PM 147 2/23/12 1:18 PM 178 2/22/12 11:59 AM 200 2/22/12 7:09 PM 147 2/23/12 1:19 PM 178 2/22/12 12:00 PM 201 2/22/12 7:10 PM 148 2/23/12 1:20 PM 178 2/22/12 12:01 PM 202 2/22/12 7:11 PM 148 2/23/12 1:21 PM 180 2/22/12 12:02 PM 202 2/22/12 7:12 PM 148 2/23/12 1:22 PM 183 2/22/12 12:03 PM 203 2/22/12 7:13 PM 149 2/23/12 1:23 PM 186 2/22/12 12:04 PM 204 2/22/12 7:14 PM 150 2/23/12 1:24 PM 188 2/22/12 12:05 PM 204 2/22/12 7:15 PM 150 2/23/12 1:25 PM 191 2/22/12 12:06 PM 205 2/22/12 7:16 PM 151 2/23/12 1:26 PM 195 2/22/12 12:07 PM 206 2/22/12 7:17 PM 151 2/23/12 1:27 PM 198 2/22/12 12:08 PM 207 2/22/12 7:18 PM 151 2/23/12 1:28 PM 200 2/22/12 12:09 PM 207 2/22/12 7:19 PM 150 2/23/12 1:29 PM 204 2/22/12 12:10 PM 208 2/22/12 7:20 PM 149 2/23/12 1:30 PM 206 2/22/12 12:11 PM 208 2/22/12 7:21 PM 147 2/23/12 1:31 PM 208 2/22/12 12:12 PM 209 2/22/12 7:22 PM 145 2/23/12 1:32 PM 210 2/22/12 12:13 PM 210 2/22/12 7:23 PM 143 2/23/12 1:33 PM 212 2/22/12 12:14 PM 210 2/22/12 7:24 PM 142 2/23/12 1:34 PM 213Bag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

2/22/12 12:15 PM 211 2/22/12 7:25 PM 141 2/23/12 1:35 PM 215 2/22/12 12:16 PM 211 2/22/12 7:26 PM 141 2/23/12 1:36 PM 215 2/22/12 12:17 PM 211 2/22/12 7:27 PM 141 2/23/12 1:37 PM 216 2/22/12 12:18 PM 211 2/22/12 7:28 PM 142 2/23/12 1:38 PM 217 2/22/12 12:19 PM 212 2/22/12 7:29 PM 142 2/23/12 1:39 PM 218 2/22/12 12:20 PM 212 2/22/12 7:30 PM 143 2/23/12 1:40 PM 219 2/22/12 12:21 PM 213 2/22/12 7:31 PM 144 2/23/12 1:41 PM 220 2/22/12 12:22 PM 213 2/22/12 7:32 PM 144 2/23/12 1:42 PM 220 2/22/12 12:23 PM 213 2/22/12 7:33 PM 145 2/23/12 1:43 PM 221 2/22/12 12:24 PM 213 2/22/12 7:34 PM 146 2/23/12 1:44 PM 221 2/22/12 12:25 PM 214 2/22/12 7:35 PM 147 2/23/12 1:45 PM 222 2/22/12 12:26 PM 214 2/22/12 7:36 PM 148 2/23/12 1:46 PM 222 2/22/12 12:27 PM 214 2/22/12 7:37 PM 148 2/23/12 1:47 PM 223 2/22/12 12:28 PM 214 2/22/12 7:38 PM 149 2/23/12 1:48 PM 224 2/22/12 12:29 PM 214 2/22/12 7:39 PM 149 2/23/12 1:49 PM 224 2/22/12 12:30 PM 214 2/22/12 7:40 PM 150 2/23/12 1:50 PM 224 2/22/12 12:31 PM 214 2/22/12 7:41 PM 150 2/23/12 1:51 PM 223 2/22/12 12:32 PM 214 2/22/12 7:42 PM 151 2/23/12 1:52 PM 223 2/22/12 12:33 PM 215 2/22/12 7:43 PM 151 2/23/12 1:53 PM 223 2/22/12 12:34 PM 215 2/22/12 7:44 PM 152 2/23/12 1:54 PM 222 2/22/12 12:35 PM 215 2/22/12 7:45 PM 152 2/23/12 1:55 PM 222 2/22/12 12:36 PM 215 2/22/12 7:46 PM 153 2/23/12 1:56 PM 222 2/22/12 12:37 PM 215 2/22/12 7:47 PM 153 2/23/12 1:57 PM 221 2/22/12 12:38 PM 215 2/22/12 7:48 PM 154 2/23/12 1:58 PM 221 2/22/12 12:39 PM 216 2/22/12 7:49 PM 154 2/23/12 1:59 PM 220 2/22/12 12:40 PM 216 2/22/12 7:50 PM 155 2/23/12 2:00 PM 219 2/22/12 12:41 PM 216 2/22/12 7:51 PM 154 2/23/12 2:01 PM 218 2/22/12 12:42 PM 216 2/22/12 7:52 PM 154 2/23/12 2:02 PM 218 2/22/12 12:43 PM 216 2/22/12 7:53 PM 152 2/23/12 2:03 PM 219 2/22/12 12:44 PM 216 2/22/12 7:54 PM 150 2/23/12 2:04 PM 219 2/22/12 12:45 PM 216 2/22/12 7:55 PM 147 2/23/12 2:05 PM 219 2/22/12 12:46 PM 216 2/22/12 7:56 PM 145 2/23/12 2:06 PM 220 2/22/12 12:47 PM 216 2/22/12 7:57 PM 143 2/23/12 2:07 PM 220 2/22/12 12:48 PM 216 2/22/12 7:58 PM 141 2/23/12 2:08 PM 220 2/22/12 12:49 PM 216 2/22/12 7:59 PM 140 2/23/12 2:09 PM 220 2/22/12 12:50 PM 216 2/22/12 8:00 PM 139 2/23/12 2:10 PM 221 2/22/12 12:51 PM 215 2/22/12 8:01 PM 139 2/23/12 2:11 PM 221 2/22/12 12:52 PM 215 2/22/12 8:02 PM 139 2/23/12 2:12 PM 222 2/22/12 12:53 PM 215 2/22/12 8:03 PM 140 2/23/12 2:13 PM 222 2/22/12 12:54 PM 214 2/22/12 8:04 PM 140 2/23/12 2:14 PM 223 2/22/12 12:55 PM 214 2/22/12 8:05 PM 141 2/23/12 2:15 PM 224 2/22/12 12:56 PM 214 2/22/12 8:06 PM 142 2/23/12 2:16 PM 224 2/22/12 12:56 PM 2/22/12 8:06 PM 2/23/12 2:16 PM 2/22/12 12:57 PM 213 2/22/12 8:07 PM 142 2/23/12 2:17 PM 224 2/22/12 12:58 PM 213 2/22/12 8:08 PM 143 2/23/12 2:18 PM 225 2/22/12 12:59 PM 212 2/22/12 8:09 PM 143 2/23/12 2:19 PM 225 2/22/12 1:00 PM 211 2/22/12 8:10 PM 144 2/23/12 2:20 PM 225 2/22/12 1:01 PM 210 2/22/12 8:11 PM 145 2/23/12 2:21 PM 225 2/22/12 1:02 PM 207 2/22/12 8:12 PM 145 2/23/12 2:22 PM 225 2/22/12 1:03 PM 205 2/22/12 8:13 PM 146 2/23/12 2:23 PM 226 2/22/12 1:04 PM 202 2/22/12 8:14 PM 145 2/23/12 2:24 PM 226 2/22/12 1:05 PM 200 2/22/12 8:15 PM 144 2/23/12 2:25 PM 226 2/22/12 1:06 PM 198 2/22/12 8:16 PM 143 2/23/12 2:26 PM 226 2/22/12 1:07 PM 196 2/22/12 8:17 PM 141 2/23/12 2:27 PM 226 2/22/12 1:08 PM 194 2/22/12 8:18 PM 139 2/23/12 2:28 PM 227 2/22/12 1:09 PM 192 2/22/12 8:19 PM 137 2/23/12 2:29 PM 227 2/22/12 1:10 PM 190 2/22/12 8:20 PM 135 2/23/12 2:30 PM 227 2/22/12 1:11 PM 188 2/22/12 8:21 PM 133 2/23/12 2:31 PM 228 2/22/12 1:12 PM 187 2/22/12 8:22 PM 131 2/23/12 2:32 PM 228 2/22/12 1:13 PM 185 2/22/12 8:23 PM 129 2/23/12 2:33 PM 226 2/22/12 1:14 PM 184 2/22/12 8:24 PM 127 2/23/12 2:34 PM 225 2/22/12 1:15 PM 184 2/22/12 8:25 PM 127 2/23/12 2:35 PM 222 2/22/12 1:16 PM 182 2/22/12 8:26 PM 127 2/23/12 2:36 PM 219 2/22/12 1:17 PM 181 2/22/12 8:27 PM 128 2/23/12 2:37 PM 217 2/22/12 1:18 PM 180 2/22/12 8:28 PM 128 2/23/12 2:38 PM 214 2/22/12 1:19 PM 179 2/22/12 8:29 PM 129 2/23/12 2:39 PM 212 2/22/12 1:20 PM 178 2/22/12 8:30 PM 130 2/23/12 2:40 PM 210 2/22/12 1:21 PM 177 2/22/12 8:31 PM 131 2/23/12 2:41 PM 207 2/22/12 1:22 PM 176 2/22/12 8:32 PM 132 2/23/12 2:42 PM 206 2/22/12 1:23 PM 175 2/22/12 8:33 PM 133 2/23/12 2:43 PM 204 2/22/12 1:24 PM 174 2/22/12 8:34 PM 133 2/23/12 2:44 PM 202 2/22/12 1:25 PM 174 2/22/12 8:35 PM 133 2/23/12 2:45 PM 201 2/22/12 1:26 PM 173 2/22/12 8:36 PM 132 2/23/12 2:46 PM 200 2/22/12 1:27 PM 172 2/22/12 8:37 PM 131 2/23/12 2:47 PM 199 2/22/12 1:28 PM 172 2/22/12 8:38 PM 130 2/23/12 2:48 PM 198 2/22/12 1:29 PM 172 2/22/12 8:39 PM 128 2/23/12 2:49 PM 198 2/22/12 1:30 PM 171 2/22/12 8:40 PM 127 2/23/12 2:50 PM 197 2/22/12 1:31 PM 171 2/22/12 8:41 PM 126 2/23/12 2:51 PM 196 2/22/12 1:32 PM 171 2/22/12 8:42 PM 124 2/23/12 2:52 PM 196 2/22/12 1:33 PM 170 2/22/12 8:43 PM 123 2/23/12 2:53 PM 195 2/22/12 1:34 PM 170 2/22/12 8:44 PM 122 2/23/12 2:54 PM 194 2/22/12 1:35 PM 169 2/22/12 8:45 PM 120 2/23/12 2:55 PM 193 2/22/12 1:36 PM 169 2/22/12 8:46 PM 119 2/23/12 2:56 PM 193 2/22/12 1:37 PM 169 2/22/12 8:47 PM 119 2/23/12 2:57 PM 193 2/22/12 1:38 PM 168 2/22/12 8:48 PM 118 2/23/12 2:58 PM 192 2/22/12 1:39 PM 168 2/22/12 8:49 PM 117 2/23/12 2:59 PM 191Bag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

2/22/12 1:40 PM 167 2/22/12 8:50 PM 117 2/23/12 3:00 PM 190 2/22/12 1:41 PM 167 2/22/12 8:51 PM 116 2/23/12 3:01 PM 190 2/22/12 1:42 PM 167 2/22/12 8:52 PM 116 2/23/12 3:02 PM 189 2/22/12 1:43 PM 166 2/22/12 8:53 PM 116 2/23/12 3:03 PM 189 2/22/12 1:44 PM 166 2/22/12 8:54 PM 115 2/23/12 3:04 PM 189 2/22/12 1:45 PM 166 2/22/12 8:55 PM 115 2/23/12 3:05 PM 188 2/22/12 1:46 PM 165 2/22/12 8:56 PM 115 2/23/12 3:06 PM 188 2/22/12 1:47 PM 165 2/22/12 8:57 PM 114 2/23/12 3:07 PM 187 2/22/12 1:48 PM 165 2/22/12 8:58 PM 114 2/23/12 3:08 PM 186 2/22/12 1:49 PM 165 2/22/12 8:59 PM 114 2/23/12 3:09 PM 186 2/22/12 1:50 PM 165 2/22/12 9:00 PM 114 2/23/12 3:10 PM 185 2/22/12 1:51 PM 165 2/22/12 9:01 PM 113 2/23/12 3:11 PM 185 2/22/12 1:52 PM 165 2/22/12 9:02 PM 113 2/23/12 3:12 PM 185 2/22/12 1:53 PM 165 2/22/12 9:03 PM 113 2/23/12 3:13 PM 184 2/22/12 1:54 PM 165 2/22/12 9:04 PM 113 2/23/12 3:14 PM 182 2/22/12 1:55 PM 165 2/22/12 9:05 PM 113 2/23/12 3:15 PM 180 2/22/12 1:56 PM 165 2/22/12 9:06 PM 114 2/23/12 3:16 PM 177 2/22/12 1:57 PM 165 2/22/12 9:07 PM 115 2/23/12 3:17 PM 175 2/22/12 1:58 PM 166 2/22/12 9:08 PM 118 2/23/12 3:18 PM 171 2/22/12 1:59 PM 166 2/22/12 9:09 PM 120 2/23/12 3:19 PM 169 2/22/12 2:00 PM 166 2/22/12 9:10 PM 122 2/23/12 3:20 PM 166 2/22/12 2:01 PM 166 2/22/12 9:11 PM 122 2/23/12 3:21 PM 163 2/22/12 2:02 PM 166 2/22/12 9:12 PM 122 2/23/12 3:22 PM 160 2/22/12 2:03 PM 166 2/22/12 9:13 PM 122 2/23/12 3:23 PM 158 2/22/12 2:04 PM 166 2/22/12 9:14 PM 121 2/23/12 3:24 PM 155 2/22/12 2:05 PM 165 2/22/12 9:15 PM 120 2/23/12 3:25 PM 153 2/22/12 2:06 PM 165 2/22/12 9:16 PM 120 2/23/12 3:26 PM 151 2/22/12 2:07 PM 165 2/22/12 9:17 PM 119 2/23/12 3:27 PM 149 2/22/12 2:08 PM 165 2/22/12 9:18 PM 118 2/23/12 3:28 PM 147 2/22/12 2:09 PM 165 2/22/12 9:19 PM 117 2/23/12 3:29 PM 146 2/22/12 2:10 PM 166 2/22/12 9:20 PM 117 2/23/12 3:30 PM 144 2/22/12 2:11 PM 166 2/22/12 9:21 PM 116 2/22/12 2:12 PM 166 2/22/12 9:22 PM 116 2/22/12 2:13 PM 166 2/22/12 9:23 PM 115 2/22/12 2:14 PM 166 2/22/12 9:24 PM 115 2/22/12 2:15 PM 166 2/22/12 9:25 PM 114 2/22/12 2:16 PM 166 2/22/12 9:26 PM 114 2/22/12 2:17 PM 166 2/22/12 9:27 PM 113 2/22/12 2:18 PM 166 2/22/12 9:28 PM 113 2/22/12 2:19 PM 166 2/22/12 9:29 PM 112 2/22/12 2:20 PM 166 2/22/12 9:30 PM 112 2/22/12 2:21 PM 165 2/22/12 9:31 PM 112 2/22/12 2:22 PM 164 2/22/12 9:32 PM 111 2/22/12 2:23 PM 162 2/22/12 9:33 PM 111 2/22/12 2:24 PM 160 2/22/12 9:34 PM 111 2/22/12 2:25 PM 157 2/22/12 9:35 PM 110 2/22/12 2:26 PM 155 2/22/12 9:36 PM 110 2/22/12 2:27 PM 152 2/22/12 9:37 PM 110 2/22/12 2:28 PM 149 2/22/12 9:38 PM 110 2/22/12 2:29 PM 147 2/22/12 9:39 PM 110 2/22/12 2:30 PM 144 2/22/12 9:40 PM 110 2/22/12 2:31 PM 142 2/22/12 9:41 PM 110 2/22/12 2:32 PM 140 2/22/12 9:42 PM 109 2/22/12 2:33 PM 138 2/22/12 9:43 PM 109 2/22/12 2:34 PM 136 2/22/12 9:44 PM 109 2/22/12 2:35 PM 134 2/22/12 9:45 PM 109 2/22/12 2:36 PM 132 2/22/12 9:46 PM 109 2/22/12 2:37 PM 131 2/22/12 9:47 PM 109 2/22/12 2:38 PM 130 2/22/12 9:48 PM 109 2/22/12 2:39 PM 129 2/22/12 9:49 PM 108 2/22/12 2:40 PM 128 2/22/12 9:50 PM 108 2/22/12 9:51 PM 108 2/22/12 9:52 PM 108 2/22/12 9:53 PM 108 2/22/12 9:54 PM 108 2/22/12 9:55 PM 107 2/22/12 9:56 PM 107 2/22/12 9:57 PM 107 2/22/12 9:58 PM 107 2/22/12 9:59 PM 107 2/22/12 10:00 PM 107 2/22/12 10:01 PM 107 2/22/12 10:02 PM 106 2/22/12 10:03 PM 106 2/22/12 10:04 PM 106 2/22/12 10:05 PM 106 2/22/12 10:06 PM 106 2/22/12 10:07 PM 106 2/22/12 10:08 PM 106 2/22/12 10:09 PM 106 2/22/12 10:10 PM 106 2/22/12 10:11 PM 106 2/22/12 10:12 PM 106 2/22/12 10:13 PM 106 2/22/12 10:14 PM 106Bag House #5 Inlet Temperatures (°F) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average Data Link Average One Minute Samples Samples Average

2/22/12 10:15 PM 106 2/22/12 10:16 PM 106 2/22/12 10:17 PM 106 2/22/12 10:18 PM 106 2/22/12 10:19 PM 106 2/22/12 10:20 PM 106