### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment. Mitch e ll E

. Daniels Jr

. 1 00 North Senate Avenue Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov



### Ms. Susan Hedman Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604-3950

Dear Ms. Hedman: May 10, 2013

Re: Request to Parallel Process the Draft MOBILE6

. 2 to MOVES MVEB Replacement Update to the Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Vigo County, Indiana

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submits the enclosed MOBILE6.2 to Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB) replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8- hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) approved the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, for Vigo County, Indiana, submitted by IDEM on July, 5 , 2005, with an effective date of February 6, 2006. IDEM requests that U.S. EPA parallel process this draft MVEB replacement submittal for approval into Indiana's State Implementation Plan.

IDEM is providing an opportunity for a public hearing on the MVEB replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana, if a public hearing request is received by June 12, 2013

. A hearing has been scheduled for June 19, 2013. If a request for a public hearing is not received by June 12, 2013, the hearing will b e cancelled. IDEM is providing a 35 day comment period on this update, with the public comment period ending on June 21 , 2013

. The final submittal of the MVEB update for the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana will document the public review process, including a detailed summary of and response to substantive comments.

Recycled Pa p er 

### (i) An Equ al Oppo rtunit y Empl oyer Pl ease Recycle ()

### Ms. Hedman Page 2
This MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB replacement update incorporates onroad emission estimates and revised MVEBs using U.S. EPA's recently adopted MOVES model. The onroad emission estimates were calculated using the MOVES-based emission factors and data extracted from the Vigo County, Indiana, area's travel-demand model.
MVEBs are being revised in anticipation of the mandatory use of the MOVES model in future transportation conformity determinations. Preliminary use of the new model indicates that emission estimates can be considerably different than similar calculations using MOBILE6.2, which was used to create the MVEBs in the original 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan.
Onroad safety margins, established through the interagency consultation process, are included for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These on road safety margins are allocated to on road emission estimates in order to account for the wide array of assumptions that are factored into the calculation process. With the addition of onroad safety margins applied to mobile sources, the Vigo County, Indiana, ozone maintenance area will continue to remain well below the overall safety margins for all sources. MVEBs are also constrained to ensure that total NOx and VOC emissions (i.e., all source categories) do not exceed attainment year emissions to ensure continued maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.

This submittal consists of one (1) hard copy of the required documentation. An electronic version of the submittal in PDF format that is identical to the hard copy has been sent to Pamela Blakley, Chief of U.S. EPA Region 5's Control Strategies Section.

IDEM respectfully requests that U.S. EPA proceed with preliminary review of the MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB replacement update and revised transportation conformity budgets and approval into Indiana's State Implementation Plan for the Vigo County, Indiana, maintenance area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Scott Deloney, Chief, Air Programs Branch, at (317) 233-5694. Sincerely, 

## ( 

## J

\ e.JJJ..._

# £.,.~8->-o! Keith Baugues Assistant Commissioner Office of Air Quality KB/sad/sms
Enclosures:

Recycfed Paper 

### (i) MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB Replacement Update to the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area for Vigo County, Indiana and Appendices. Electronic MOVES-based modeling input and output data files.

An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### C,

### Ms. Hedman Page 3

cc: Doug Aburano, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) Steve Rosenthal, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) Ed Doty, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures)

Recycled Paper 

# ® Pam Blakley, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) Anthony Maietta, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) Ron Hinsenkamp, WCIEDD (w/ enclosures) Keith Baugues, IDEM-OAQ (no enclosures) Scott Deloney, IDEM (no enclosures) Shawn Seals, IDEM (w/ enclosures)

An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle (j

### This page intentionally left blank.

### LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Motor Vehicle Emission Budget Replacement Update to the Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Vigo County, Indiana

Notice is hereby given under 40 CFR 51.102 that the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is accepting written comment and providing an

· opportunity for public hearing regarding the Motor Vehicle Emission Budget (MVEB) replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana. Onroad emissions for the original submittal were calculated using the MOBILE6.2 mobile model and are now being replaced with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) recently adopted Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) mobile model. All interested persons are invited and will be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the submittal ofthe proposed MVEB replacement update to the Vigo County, Indiana, maintenance area for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.

The purpose ofthis notice is to solicit public comment on Indiana's proposed MVEB replacement update. Vigo County, Indiana, was designated as nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and is sub ject to the requirements of Section 172 ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA). One of the compliance requirements mandated by Section 175A(b) ofthe CAA, i s the development of a plan demonstrating that maintenance areas will continue to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for the next ten years , which includes MVEBs for onroad sources, beyond the cunent maintenance period

. This submittal of the proposed MVEB replacement update to the 

### Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area for Vigo County, Indiana, maintenance area that was originally submitted on July 5 , 2005, is being drafted and submitted consistent with U.S. EPA guidance. Upon completion of this public notice process, the MOBILE6.2-based to MOVES-based MVEB replacement update will be submitted to U.S. EPA for approval into the State Implementation Plan.
Copies of the draft documents will be available on or before May 17 , 20 13 , to any person upon request and at the following locations:

• Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality,

Indiana Government Center Nmth, 100 Nmth Senate Avenue, Room N1003, Indi anapo li s, Indiana.

• Vigo County Public Library , One Library Square (7 111 

### and Poplar), Tene Haute,

Indiana.

The draft documents will al so be avai lable on the following web page: http ://www. in.gov/idem / airquality/2392.htm



### 1

### An electro nic version of all MOVES mobile model input and output files will be avai lable at the public hearing, if held, or upon request. Any person may submit written comments on the MVEB replacement update to the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area on or before June 21, 2013. Written comments should be directed to Mr. Shawn Seals, Mail Code 61-50, Office of Air Quality, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis , Indiana 46204; or fax (317) 233-5967; or email at SSeals@ idem .in
.gov
. Interested parties may also present oral or written comments at the public hearing, if held. Oral statements will be heard, but for the accuracy of the record, statements should be submitted in writing. Written statements may be submitted to the attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing.

A public hearing on the MVEB replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana wi ll be held if a public hearing request is received by June 12, 2013. A hearing has been scheduled for June 19, 2013. The meeting will convene at 6:00p.m. (local time) at the Vigo County Public Library, One Library Square 

## (i 11 

### and Poplar), Terre Haute, Indiana, 47807. If a request for a public hearing is not received by June 12, 2013, the hearing will be cancelled. Interested patiies can check the online IDEM calendar at http: //www.in.gov/idem /5 474.htm or contact Mr. Shawn Seals at (317) 233-0425, after June 12, 2013, to see if the hearing has been cancelled or will convene.
A transcript ofthe hearing and all written submiss ions provided at the public hearing shall be open to public inspection at IDEM and copies may be made availab le to any person upon payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard or represented at the hearing or requesting notice shall be given written notice of actions resulting from the hearing.

For additi onal information contact Mr. Shawn Seals, at the Indiana Department of Enviromnental Management, Office of Air Qual ity, Room N 1001 , Indiana Govermnent Center North, 100 Nmih Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204 or call (317) 233-0425
or (800) 451-6027 ext. 3-0425 (in Indiana).****************************************************~*********************** 

### Individuals requiring reasonable accommodationsfor participation in this hearing, if held, should contact the IDEMAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at:



### Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana Department of Enviromnental Management- Mail Code 50-10 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

Or call (31 7 ) 233-1 7 85 (voice) or (31 7 ) 232-6565 (FDD)

. Please provide a minimum of 7

2 hours notification.

2

# DRAFT Onroad Emissions MOBILE6.2 to

MOVES Replacement Submittal

Maintenance

# 'A;~a11~d~r. the 1997 8 L.··.•.·•······.······ 

# >

..

# o\·c

............... t··s·)

... .......d. d :mounj 

# zone tan ar

May 2013

### This page intentionally left blank

### Introduction



### On July 5, 2005, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Planfor Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonallainmenl Area, 

### for Vigo County, Indiana. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) subsequently approved the Indiana redesignation ofVigo County, Indiana, to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard on January 5, 2006 with an effective date of February 6, 2006 (71 FR 541). Onroad emissions for the July 5, 2005, submittal were calculated using MOBILE6.2. U.S. EPA has encouraged mobile source stakeholders to transition to the new Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model as**expeditiQ.lJ~ly** 

### as possible. Therefore, IDEM is providing this MOBILE6.2 to MOVES replacement**y.p#~Wto** 

### the previously submitted 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Vigo County, In4@1if, ozone maintenance area that

# ::;:~~:::::::-based oruoad emissions.

# /~ 1 m ·•··



### Table 4.1 was included without title in

# Appendi~~;~~;the original

# Rede~;·~~~~\\:1)) Petition and Maintenance Plan. Table 4.1 -A (to be considered a}ep)aceJ11t:Ji}tgfthe table i@lJ.Jded in Appendix B) has been revised to · updated

### ~fu:~<~4~ffil~~ion**estimatesf~f:nitrogen** oxides (NOx) and volatile organic ·the**ye!H'$~Q02,** 

### 2010, and 2015; it results in a different overall safety margin for the

Comparison**of""~:~,.,,,** 

### •.,.,

.•Jn 

### County 1997**11-llftltli~h:wn**

1

### Table 4.1-A Comparison of 2002,2010, and 2015 Emission Estimates in Tons Per Summer Day, Vigo County 1997 8

-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area (MOVES-based Onroad Emissions)
Sector 2002 NOx 2010 NOx 2015 NOx

Area 1.30 1.40 1.43 Nonroad 2.53 2.01 1.53 Onroad 14.87 7.49 4.41

Point 33.63 12.91 12.93 

### Total 52.33 23.81 20.3 Sector 2002 

## voc 2010 

## voc 2015 

## voc

Area 8.56 9.89 10.83 Nonroad 2

. 80 1.93 1.67 Onroad 5

.79 3.06 1.88

Point 6

.52 7.24 8.42 

### Total 23.67 22.12 22.8 '•:·.·.·
·;:::

### .. ··:-·-:··-·.··. 

### Onroad emission estimates in Table 4.1 -A

# we**~~ ulated** **1t~ f'rt** **g** U

. S

.

# ·:**MOVES** modelproduced emission factors and data ,e x ttacted from

### th**Khl 5.~m** **~~ ~vel-demand** **d'~ i.**  The MOVES model implements a signifiq,{ ni\) 7

-

different

### ap**P** to emissions estimation than the previous model (MOBILE 6.2).

### Preli**rhh~ ai** **y~~ e**  

# 9±: the

### MO**V~** ..model indicates that emis s ion estimates can b e considerably different

### th**~ irnii** **r \~ulati** **oM ~jng**  MOBILE6.2, which was '=

. •, •'•'

... . ·.·.·.·,·.·,·, 

### used to create the**origi11~ MY.~** **s** 

### for the W igo County ,Jndiana; : qmn 8

-hour ozone nonattainment area
. .

### ~i**)H~f @p~** **nary of'th** **,. MQY.** **.: iri:** **tb;qdol y**  used in thi s area can be found in Appendix 

# N

. ::m

m.. additio' B

't

M,:OVES

### p'l**t rid**  outpu t· file s are being provide d electronically with

### thi**(S~U 1J!Jlittal.**  : G

f owth and \)oti \rol strategy assumptions for non-mobile
s ources (i.e.

### ar**ea ~** **nonroad ~\** **4P. 9fut** **); Jr.9.** **W** the

### ig~IJ;al submittal for the ye ar s 2002 , 2010, and



## . . . 

### . .

### ........................ , 

# , .. . 2015**wei de** **loped fore** **'· ]j** **:t? ::** **~o'llo mi** **<i :~** **!: J.leng** **ofthe** 

### last several years. Because ofthis, the

### fa**~i~ ~j** **ncludea in** **~~ rigl** **H~ J..ibmittaf** **~Y:: J}e** **ct** more growth than will actually occur in



# . .. 

# ., ...... .

### ........ the future ; · As a result , the gr9wtli':an9

..

_ control st l.:

ate gy as sumptions for the non-mobile s ources for the y eru k 2002 , 2010, am { 2Q15

### fi**W. ~1e**  to be valid and do not affect the overall conclusions 

### f '•..

. '·

.... ·.;.;.;.;.;

.. o the plan

. ··:::;:: .,.. '\ ··:::::::::::· 

## "····**~::.:** 

## .**'\~\** ·.:.- 

### Onroad safety**mai.·g~** 

### have**be~fl** 

### ,i ncluded for onroad emission es timates to accommodate the wide array of ass umpHop.s

### that**factored** into the calculation process. Since assumptions change over time , it is

### n:**c~s shl·y** .

# .fo have an onroad safety margin that will accommodate the impact of refined assumptiop.s :· }n the process. The plan continues to meet all applicable Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements as the revised emi s sion inventories clearly illustrate that total NO x and VOC emissions in the Vigo County , Indiana, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area will continue to decline leading to local reductions between 2002 (base year) and 201 0 (maintenance plan interim budget year) , as well as 2002 (b ase year) and 2015 (maintenance plan horiz on budget year)

.

2

### Transpot·tation Conformity Budgets

Table 5

. 1 was included on Page 18 ofthe original Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan for the Vigo County, Indiana , 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area
. Table 5.1 -A (to be considered a replacement of Table 5.1) has been revised to incorporate U

. S. EPA's MOVES model-produced emission factors and data extracted from the region's travel-demand model.



### Table 5.1 Emission Estimations for On

-Road Mobile Sources for the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-Hour Ozone**Non~ttainment** 

### Area (MOBILE6.2

-based Onroad

### Emi!!s.i~ns)



## .....**~:1'; ·::·~.>.**  

### 2002 2015 Margin of Safety VMT (miles/day) 3,506,570 VOC (tons/day) NOx (tons/day)

# ·(~;if;~:

# ..**~~ )** a

# ~I**e** 5.1

# ::**~\~[~i!!lllil;;::::::-·** ·:

..,. J Emission**Estimatiov~:.foi Qm** **~ad** 

### MobiJ t §
. ources for the Vigo County, Indiana,**~>7 8~Hoiir** **,: 9~one** **N~ ~~** **ttainment** 

### Area



### ..:::::::::::::::·(00,

# o VES-

### ti**a~ed On** **~6 ·:.** **Emissirili s)** **::::**..



## .**;:::(l{j{~:::::::~::{j~~>·, \~:--'** **·~** 

## .·.·**.~::·** 

## .}·:··:;::) :\::::... '::::;::' 2015 VOC

### (ton**s/d ~y)** **}::** •
..

•.•. 

### 5

.79 3.06 1. 88



## ,.,, NQl (tqt1s/.day) ··:::

.• 

## .

. . •

## ..·.**~** ' 

### 14.87 7.49 4.4 1

.·> ·,•.•;•, • ·.;.:·:·:·:·.**"-~·=···:·:·:.>:·.•.** \::

...... 

### 10.07% 9.88%



# ..:·:··.:**··::~~;.· ··~**  

# <

..**·::·~,** 

# ··::::::::::::..**··~·;~::::::::::::~:** 

# . Tab le**.' ~~~**  

### also inclucteB

·oh

.Pagc it:t'Q ::.Pft he origiMl Rede signation Petition and Maintenance P lan for the V :igo County, Indi

. alia,

### 19**~ri% l;l.our**  ozone maintenance area
. Table 5.2

- A (to be •,·. 

### ,. 

### . •,•,•,•.•.·, 

### considered a t:eP.

. lasement**ofTabJe '~** **5.2) as** **:: ~~e** **n** 

### revised to incorporate MVEB s c alculated using U.S

. EPA's

### MOV~S**model-prod\l<J d**  emission factors and data extracted from the region's traveldemand model as & tailed in Tabli:t 5:.1

- A. 

### '\::::**./·.·:~:i**

### ··:::(l~t=··:::~::·:::.;:> Table 5.2
-:.;
.. :/ Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MOBILE6
.2-based Onroad Emissions)

2015 tons/day 

## voc**~** 

### NOx**~**



### 3

### Table 5.2- A Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8

-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area (MOVES-based Onroad Emissions)

2015 VOC (tons/summer day) 2. 1 7 NOx (tons/summer day) 5.07 

# .·{();;: Through th e interagency consultation process, it was determ

. in¢Wtliat a mai ntenance plan horizon year budget of20 15 , would be appropriate

. The

### inter**age~9 ~qp~** **~ltation** group approved onroad
marg in s of safety of fifteen percent (15%) for both VO C



### .aiid**No ·**  

### · onroad emiss ion estimates for the year 2 015. A summary ofthi s interagency

### con**ultatio ~** **discus ~n**  can be found in Appendix B. These revi sed emi ss ion inventories clearly il !u· strate that onro ad VOG.

..a
. nd N Ox emiss ion s in the Vigo County, Indiana , 1997 8-h.our ozone m aintenance area will contimi' tdo decline leading to loc al re duction s b etween 2002 (base year) and 2015 (maintenaqce plan hodzo

. n budget year).

Furthermore, when compared to the

# i~i:?**lt safety**  margin as

# .f~**fi ~d**  in the

# C~~:**·: Federal** 
. . .. .... . .. :Y 

### Regulation s (CFR) at 40 CFR 93.101,**{~Y:~~ :J.** **~~1t** 

### the**oru :C~** **~** 

### saf ety margin allocation i s reasonable and appropriate. More**spedfi $~** **Ji ~:V.:e** **n** 

### with the ·· a}'Iocation of an omoad safety margin to mobile sources, emissions will continugi.o

### reml**in w~** **u** belovv':the overall safety margin for all
sources as detailed in Table 4.1 ;. A. 

### MVEB s :·k re cons'tiifned

. to ensure that the total emiss ions (i.e., all source categotje ; ) do not exceed the

## 29**o~ ~iW** **~ih(Y,~ar .**  emi

. ssions of e ither VOC or NOx, thereby ensuring

.continued maintenance 6Hhel997

### 8-h**'J~lozo ne**  standard

. "·· 0:::: .·**~.** ··:····· 

### C l . ..;::.:··:·. ::;::::::::.

one uswn · :·· :···.. ··=·=·=< · 

# ·<

...**··~r:·:·:nr:r::·** :=>·

# ~~ . .. ... 

# \::?:=: This M QB ILE6 .2 to**MO Y~~** **repl<: ~ce** **nt updat** **~** 

### to the·previously submitted 

### Request for RedesigrlCiti'ory and**Maint~n~ ~q** **e** 

### P{ anfor

. ,Ozone At tctinment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonattainii 1e.ijt 1: rea, for**Vig 'b** **:C ?}~** **nty :'** **tz diana**  

### incorporates omoad emission estimates and a revi sed**MV EB** **~~ ~ng**  

### U.S.**EPA t~** **i)~cently a,~op** **ted** 

### MOVES model. MVEB s have been revised in anticipation**ofth~ ::** **mm 1datory**  

### us e=:b;f:

. the MOVES model in future transportati on conformity detennination s
.

### Th'6**:: ~J\r,~;>** **ad** 

# emisMbp estimates were calculated using the MOVES-based emission facto rs and data**extracte fi.·** **om tl** **{~ ·;** **ai·ea's** 

### travel-demand model. Onroad safety margins for VOCs
and NOx, establi shed

### thr**dhgh:,th~jBte age** **ncy** con sultation proces s , are included in order to acco unt for the wide array of**assump h9n~** **·** 

### that are factored into the calculation process. MVEB s are also constrained to en sure that total VOC and NOx emissions (i.e., all source categories) do not exceed attainment year (2002) emissions to ensure continued maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone stand ard

. With the addition ofMOVES

-based onroad safety margins appli ed to mobile sourc es, the Vigo County, Indiana, o zone maintenance area will continue to remain well below the overall
safety margins for all sources into the future. As such, the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for Vi go County, Indiana, continues to meet all appli cable CAA requirements

.

4

# Appendix A

Vigo County, Indiana, Maintenance Area MOVES Methodology

### This page left intentionally blank

# Terre Haute MOVES2010a Input Data and Parameters

INDOT Planning Contract



# Final Report October 4 , 2012



# CDMth Sm1Table of Contents Overview

.............................................................................................................................. 1 Vehicle Age Distribution

....................................................................................................... 1 Vehicle Population

................................................................................................................ 2 Meteorological Data

.............................................................................................................. 4 Default VMT Distributions

..................................................................................................... 4 Default Hourly Distributions

.................................................................................................. 5 Default Daily and Monthly Distributions

................................................................................ 6 Ramp Fractions

.................................................................................................................... 6

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: MOVES2010a Source Type Codes

............................................................................. 1 Table 2: MOVES2010a Road Type Codes

................................................................................ 1 Table 3: Distribution of MOBILE 6.2 Light Duty Trucks into MOVES Source Types

................... 3 Table 4: Inventory of Permanent Count Stations

....................................................................... 5

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A- MOVES2010a Input Settings and Assumptions Appendix B- Vehicle Age Distributions for Vigo County Appendix C- Vehicle Populations for Vigo County Appendix D- Meteorological Data for Vigo County Appendix E- Default Statewide Factors Appendix F- Statewide Default Hourly Distribution Factors Appendix G- Statewide Default Daily Distribution Factors Appendix H- Statewide Default Monthly Distribution Factors Appendix I

- Ramp FractionsOverview: This report is being written to document the input parameters for a set of MOVES201 Oa runs for the Terre Haute 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Area. This report contains a discussion on the intended input settings used in MOVES201 Oa and the development of the input datasets. These MOVES201 Oa runs are intended to develop a default set of emission rates that can be used for conformity determination and is part of a statewide effort being conducted by the Indiana Department of Transportation (IN DOT). Throughout this report references are made to MOVES 201 Oa codes for two types of data. The values for the source type codes are shown in Table 1. The values for the road type codes are shown in Table 2. MOVES2010a input settings and assumptions for this effort are shown in Appendix A.

Table 1: MOVES2010a Source Type Codes sourcetypeid Description 

### 11 Motorcycles 

### 21 Passenger Car 

### 31 Passenger Truck 

### 32 Light Commercial Truck 

### 41 Intercity Bus 

### 42 Transit Bus 

### 43 School Bus 

### 51 Refuse Truck 

### 52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 

### 53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 

### 54 Motor Home 

### 61 Combination Short-haul Truck 

### 62 Combination Long-haul Truck

Table 2: MOVES2010a Road Type Codes roadtypeid

Vehicle Age Distribution: 1 2 3 4 5 Description Off Network Rural Restricted Access Rural Unrestricted Access Urban Restricted Access Urban Unrestricted Access

The vehicle age distributions for MOVES source types 21, 31, and 32 (cars, passenger trucks, and light commercial vehicles respectively) were developed through an analysis of Indiana's 2009 vehicle registration data. The analysis was performed by Eastern Research Group (ERG) under contract to the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO). ERG was provided with vehicle identification numbers (VIN) for vehicles in Indiana.There were approximately 6.37 million VINs in the statewide data set. Out of these, approximately 1.3 million returned errors. Of these, approximately 200,000 errors were deemed non-critical. This means that the model year and vehicle type assigned to the records were most likely correct despite there being an error in the VIN decoding. These records were included in ERG's analysis. The remaining errors were considered critical enough to call into question the accuracy of the model year and vehicle types. These critical errors were excluded from ERG's analysis.
In all, approximately 5.2 million VINs from around the state were used in the analysis. Each VIN was associated to a specific county. ERG then developed age distributions for each county in the state along with seven combination areas comprised of two or more counties each. Additional information on the methodology used to develop the vehicle age distributions can be found in a May 28, 2010 report written by ERG for LADCO titled MOBILE6 and MOVES Registration Distribution Calculations for Indiana Registration Data. Each set of age distributions was provided in both MOBILE6 and MOVES formats. The MOVES formatted data will be used for these MOVES201 Oa runs.
Due to limitations in ERG's VIN decoder, it was not possible to develop vehicle age distributions for any source types other than 21, 31, and 32 from the vehicle registration data. For all other source types, MOVES201 Oa default vehicle age distributions specific to each source types were used. This includes motorcycles and all heavy vehicles. Vehicle age distributions for all source types were kept constant for all future years. The vehicle age distributions for Vi go County are shown in Appendix B of this report.
Vehicle Population: The vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were developed directly from the vehicle registration data. All valid records that were identified from the vehicle registration data set were used to determine the number of vehicles for each of these three source types. The VIN decoded data provided to INDOT contained vehicle types according to MOBILE6.2 vehicle categories. There is a direct correlation between MOVES source type 21 (cars) and the MOBILE6.2 vehicle type LDV. All valid LDV records (those records not excluded from the vehicle age distribution analysis due to errors as was described in the section on Vehicle Age Distribution in this report) were counted in the vehicle population.
There is not a direct correlation between MOVES source types 31 (passenger trucks) and 32 (light commercial vehicles) and the MOBILE6.2 light truck vehicle types (LDT1, LDT2, LDT3, and LDT4). All valid records from the vehicle registration data set for MOBILE6.2 light duty trucks were counted in the vehicle populations. The light duty trucks were distributed between MOVES source types 31 and 32 as per the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) guidance documented in Table A.1 of the appendix of the Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission lnventorv Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity. The guidance provides two sets of factors for distributing MOBILE6.2 light trucks between MOVES source types 31 and 32. These are based on fuel type and are shown in Table 3.

2Table 3: Distribution of MOBILES L' h D 

### .2 lgl t · to MOVES Source Types uty Trucks m Source Types Fuel 

### 31 32 Gas 78% 22% Diesel 42% 58%
As per ERG's assumption documented in MOBILE6 and MOVES Registration Distribution Calculations for Indiana Registration Data, all light duty trucks that did not have a fuel type identified were counted as diesel trucks. This was to prevent an underestimation of diesel trucks and their related emissions.
Since only valid records from the vehicle registration data were used to calculate vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32, it is reasonable to assume that some of the erroneous records that were discarded from the analysis actually belonged to these source types. The nature of these errors is not that the vehicle does not exist. Rather, it is that the vehicle could not be properly identified with any sense of certainty. It was therefore necessary to adjust the vehicle populations calculated from vehicle registration data to compensate for these discarded records. Based on an analysis of the error rate reported by ERG, vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were increased by 5.8 percent.
Vehicle populations were not able to be developed directly from the vehicle registration data for some source types. This was due to the limitations in the VIN decoder used by ERG to process the vehicle registration data. Vehicle populations for all other source types (motorcycles and heavy vehicles) were derived by applying the Mileage Accumulation Rate (MAR) method documented in EPA's Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES201 0 for Emission lnventorv Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity, Section 3.3 Source Type Population.
The default MARs were extracted from MOVES by running MOVES for a single pollutant and a single year for all vehicles, fuels, months, days, and hours. The activity output was set to report both distance and population. A ratio of population to vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) was calculated from these outputs. The ratios were calculated for each source type.
The metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Terre Haute

- Vigo County provided VMT by MOVES road types extracted from their travel demand model's base year. Since the default MARs in MOVES vary by year (but not by location), the MOVES run that was executed to extract the MARs was run for a year consistent with the travel demand model's base year. This resulted in MARs that could be applied directly to the validated VMTs reported by the travel demand model. The travel demand model VMTs were converted into annual VMT and distributed by vehicle types using statewide default VMT distribution factors documented in this report in the section on Default VMT Distributions. The MARs were then applied to the annual vehicle type VMTs. The result was an estimated vehicle population for each source type for the travel demand model's base year. Since the vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were developed directly from the vehicle registration data, the population estimates derived for those source types using the MAR method were discarded and the observed data were used instead.

3Future year vehicle populations were developed base on socioeconomic growth rates for the maintenance area. The MPO provided base year and horizon year population and employment data for the area. Annual growth rates were calculated for population growth and employment growth individually. Population growth rates were then used to grow the light vehicle populations (source types 11, 21, 31, and 32). Employment growth rates were used to grow the heavy vehicle populations (source types 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 54, 61, and 62). Vehicle populations were calculated for every year from 2008 to 2040. These vehicle populations for Vigo County are shown in Appendix C. Meteorological Data: The default set of hourly temperatures and hourly relative humidity was developed using EPA's data converters for changing MOBILE6.2 minimum 

### I maximum temperatures and absolute humidity to the MOVES equivalent formats. The values for the MOBILE6.2 inputs were taken from the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, Appendix C, developed by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management in October, 2005. The MOVES formatted meteorological data for Vigo County are presented in Appendix D of this report.
Default VMT Distributions: As part of this effort, INDOT developed a default set of VMT distribution factors by Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) vehicle type and by MOVES road type. These distribution factors were developed by analyzing four consecutive years of continuous traffic count data ending in 2010 for twenty permanent traffic count stations throughout Indiana. The stations were selected to provide a spread of locations corresponding to each of the four MOVES road types. Furthermore, these stations were selected from among sites that were concentrated in nonattainment and maintenance areas. In some cases, data from the requested site were either partially or completely unavailable. An inventory of the sites used to develop the distributions is shown in Table 

### 4.
The vehicle counts reported at each station were provided by vehicle class. These were aggregated into the six basic HPMS vehicle types: motorcycle, passenger car, light truck, bus, single-unit heavy truck, and combination heavy truck. The distribution of VMT by vehicle type was calculated for each road type by taking each vehicle type's percentage of total traffic. These default statewide factors are shown in Appendix E.

4Table 4 Inventory of Permanent Count Stations SiteiD City County Location Road Type Data Quality

3000 MUNCIE DELAWARE SR 332 RM 0.5 

### 3 Closed since 9/26/2006. No data. 3200 3300 4000 4500 5600 6100 CARMEL HAMILTON INDY WEST MARION GARY LAKE LAPORTE LAPORTE SELLERSBURG CLARK EVANSVILLE GIBSON US 31 RM 125.7 5 1465 MM 10.0 4 I 80 /I 94 MM 6.0 4 SR2 RM65.2 3 165 MM 8.0 4 164 MM 27.9 2 Good Closed since 9/1/10 Only 2010 data passed QC Good Bad sensors. Not usable. Good 0105 TERRE HAUTE VIGO US 41 RM 104.2 

### 3 Good-closed 5/13/09 11/13/08-

0201 0210 0303 0327 I 0403

0501 0502 0507 0602 MIDDLEBURY ELKHART FORT WAYNE ALLEN MUNCIE DELAWARE DALEVILLE DELAWARE SOUTH BEND ST. JOSEPH INDY SOUTH MARION MARTINSVILLE MORGAN SEYMOUR JACKSON HAZLETON GIBSON SR 120 RM 13.9 3 1-69 0.53 mi N of 4 SR3 US 35 RM 44.5 5 169MM31.4 2 US 20 RM 77.1 4 SR 37 RM 143.5 5 SR 67 RM 80.6 3 165 MM 47.0 2 SR 56 RM 0.6 3 Good- closed 8/3/10-12/6/10 Good Good Good-built in 12/10/2007 Good Good-closed 5/22/09-6/1/09 Good Good Good 0603 DUBOIS DUBOIS SR 56 RM 53.3 

### 3 

### 5 

### 4 Good- closed 10/16/08- 3/20/09 0608 EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SR66 RM 23.5 Good 1315 I 70 MARION I 70 MM 83.5 Closed 5/17/06-3/24/08

Default Hourly Distributions: The same set of twenty permanent traffic count locations discussed in the section on Default VMT Distributions was analyzed to develop a set of hourly distribution factors. These factors were calculated by road type, by HPMS vehicle type. Hourly factors were only calculated for the average weekday. The hourly distribution pattern for each traffic count location was reviewed. Any data that appeared to reflect either an error in the data or an outlier of behavior were removed to prevent bias in the data. The following data were excluded from the analysis:

• Bus data from count stations 0105 and 0603 were excluded due to abnormal midnight peaks in the data;
• An abnormal relationship between passenger cars and light duty trucks at count station 4500 prompted the exclusion of all data from this location due to questions of reliability;
• Peak spreading behavior observed at count station 4000 from traffic related to Chicago was considered to be too unique to be included in a default statewide data set; and,
• Combination truck traffic from station 3200 was excluded due to too much overnight traffic when compared to other vehicles and other stations.

5Furthermore, traffic patterns reported by those count stations corresponding to road type 3 (3000, 4500, 0105, 0201, 0502, 0602, and 0603) had a tendency to over represent long distance travel. This was most likely the result of statewide permanent count stations focusing primarily on higher order facilities. Rural collectors and local streets are less likely to reflect long distance travel. The hourly distributions for road type 3 (rural unrestricted access) were adjusted to better account for traffic behavior on lower order facilities in rural areas. A sample of traffic count data from Morgan County, IN was used to introduce more local traffic behavior in the road type 3 hourly distributions. An analysis of the Morgan County data showed a pattern rnore consistent with AM and PM peaking characteristics reflecting local commuting traffic on collectors and local streets for passenger cars and light duty trucks. The Morgan County data for passenger cars and light duty trucks on collectors and local streets were weighted and added to the road type 3 data set. This analysis assumed that rural collectors and local streets accounted for 20 percent of all VMT for road type 3.
The statewide default hourly distribution factors are presented in Appendix F.
Default Daily and Monthly Distributions: Default daily and monthly distribution factors were calculated from IN DOT's official count adjustment factors which are more commonly used to develop AADT from raw traffic counts. These factors are based on the set of daily traffic counts collected from all permanent count stations throughout the state. The daily distribution factors determine what percentage of VMT is occurring on weekdays and what percentage is occurring on weekends. The monthly distribution factors determine what percentage of annual VMT is occurring in each month of the year. The statewide default daily distribution factors are shown in Appendix G. The statewide default monthly distribution factors are shown in Appendix H. Ramp Fractions: The ramp fractions represent the percentage of vehicle-hours-traveled (VHT) for road types 2 (rural restricted access) and 4 (urban restricted access) occurring on the ramps associated with those road types. These fractions were calculated based on the percentage of VHT occurring on ramps reported by the base year travel demand model. These ramp fractions are reported in Appendix 

### I.

6Appendix A

Number ofRuns:

Input Item Ozone Years 2002, 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025 , 2030, 2035,2040 Pollutants/ Volatile Processes Organic Compound (VOC }, NO x , and supporting Meteorology Summer #ofMOVES 8 runsGeneral Parameters: MOVES Input Item Screen Ozone Description Description User Choice Scale Domain/Scale County Calculation Type Emission Rate Time Spans Time Hour Aggregation Level Year 2002 , 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025 , 2030, 2035 , 2040 Months July Days Weekday Hours Select All Geographic Geographic Vigo County Bounds Bounds Vehicles Vehicles All Gas and Diesel Combinations Road Type Road Type Select All Pollutants/ Pollutants/ VOC, NOx, and Processes Processes supporting General Database Name Vigo Ozone Output Units Select "Grams" and "Miles" and "Mill ion BTU" Activity Distance , Population Output On Road Select "Source Emissions Use Type" and Detail "Road Type"

### C t D t M 

# • County Data Excel Sheet Tab Manager Input Name
Ozone Source (Vehicle) source Type Year Local Registration for Source Types 21 , 31, and Type Population 32; Estimated population using default MOVES mileage accumulation rates and local VMT for all other source types

. Future year vehicle populations based on population growth rates for source types 11, 21, 31, and 32

. Employment growth used for all other source types.
Vehicle Type H PMSVType Year Statewide default vehicle distributions across VMT (by 13 road types developed by INDOT using an MOVES Vehicle analysis of permanent count station data from a Types) statewide data set. MonthVMTFraction Statewide default monthly fractions developed by INDOT using an analysis of permanent count station data from a statewide data set. DayVMTFraction Statewide default daily fractions developed by INDOT using an analysis of permanent count station data from a statewide data set. HourVMTFraction Statewide default hourly fractions developed by INDOT using an analysis of permanent count station d ata from a statewid e data set. Average Speed avgSpeed National defaults

. Distribution (% Distribution of VHT in each 5 mph speed bin) Road Type roadType Cal c ul ated from loca l VMT data

. Use trave l Distribution Distribution demand model base year distributions for all (VM T by 5 years. MOVES Ro ad Types) Age Distribution source TypeAge Local age distributions developed from vehicle (Vehicle Distribution registration data for source types 21, 31, a nd 32. Population by Default MOVES age distributions for all other Ag e of Vehi c le) source types

. Ramp Fraction RoadType Based on local travel demand model.

Meteorology ZoneMonthHour MOBILE6 Summer Met Data Converted to Data MOVES format

Fuel(% of FueiFormulation MOVES Defaults Market Share by FueiSupply Vigo County MOVES Defaults for Summer Fuel Type) (check if varies among counties) liM Program IMCoverage No ProgramAppendix B
Vfao Countv Vehicle Aae Distributions for Viao Countv: Source Types aaeid 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 0 0.2109690540 0.0212253419 0.0081779159 0.0207930917 ' 0.0643023355 0.0545743076 0.0622220043 0.0494240790 0.0588526168 0.0787544027 0.0615095870 0.05356346,60 0.0670845256 1 0.1921154969 0.0452075694 0.0354869745 0.0502215657 0.0626728412 0.0531913309 0.0606452875 0.0481716155 0.0573612230 0.0767586735 0.0599508636 0.0535634660 0.0670845256 2 0.1573471585 o:o488477289 0.0404:455299 0.0557891149 0.0624853859 0.0530322328 0.0604638952**0.~80275345** 0.0571896519 0.0765290827 0.0597715492 0,0541045093**0,0~77621447** 3 0.1359771581 0.0455822917 0.0384103020 0.0466992387 0.0624229593 0.0529792497 0.0604034894 0.0479795509 0.0571325186 0.0764526251 0.0597118340 0.0575579884 0.0720873878 4 0.1058454735 0.0506945746 0,0010938425 0.064878991_0_ 0.0617369906 0.0523970560 0.0597397140 0.0474523026 0.0565046834 0.0756124785 ' 0.0590556596 0.0564182312 0.0706599203 5 0.0750909142 0.0544953294 0.0599837182 0.0656743552 0.0559170498 0.0474575929 0.0541080614 0.0429789769 0.0511779950 0.0684845018 0.0534884926 0.0489290859 0.0612802835 6 0.0476805323. 0.0564492385 0.00287,00414 0.0585160777 0.0468365056 0.0397508123 0.0453212873 0,0359994879 0.0428670388 0.0573630890 0.0448023279_ 0.0366034411

- 0.0458432683 7 0.0331026886 0.0630068788 0.0694937833 0.0676059539 0.0425786431 0.0361370941 0.0412011709 0.0327268079 0.0389700355 0.0521482660 0.0407293873 0.0340742206 0.0426755959 8 0.0197278356 0.0613473943 0.0600207223 0.0580615839 0.0468268516 0.0397426124 0.0453119367 0.0359920640 0.0428582007 0.0573512681 0.0447930981, 0.0358093100**_0.0_448~86759** 9 0.0118473747 0.0728299564 0.0640171699 0.0665833428 0.0534377006 0.0453533365 0.0517089150 0.0410733035 0.0489087688 0.0654479137 0.0511168252 0.0526288382 0.0659139597 10 0.0053251771 0.0676106100 0.0640911782 0.0587433246 0.0532712252 0.0452120443 _0.0515478328 0.0409453420 0.0487564067 0.0652440247 0.0509575859 0.0624520143 0.0782168041 11 0.0025378610 0.0521934638 0.0564683245 0.0572662197 0.0407951886 0.0536203440 0.0411075833 0.0313560350 0.0391491717 0.0523881239 0.0302729398 0.0478258601 0.0598985955 12 0.0013011470 0.0540135435 0.0538780343 0.0451_0851 04 0.0331924560 0.0489936472 0.0382933197 0.0255124310 0.0294483131 0.0394065607 0.0466101866 0.0389128550 0.048735417_9 13 0.0006124019 0.0461443752 0.0408525755 0.0342006590 0.0277347637 0.0456089741 0.0333751020 0.0545980574 0.0316399801 0.0194774783 0.0291673253 0.0325145854 0.0462990441 14 0.0002476898 0.0488477289 0.0435538780 0.0363595046 0.0364294706 0,0377746681 0.0430863640 0.0632656498 0.0364439725 0.0194691525 0.0347804437 0.0427077419 0.0462072388 15 0.0001527705 0.0375525280 0.0415556542 0.0381774798 0.0283511969 0.0332950401 0.0210164622 0.0395649332 0.0357887614 0.0311848083 0.0335202065 0.0332372597 0.0300444032 16 0.0000668536 0_.033965_9003 O.D_335257549 0.02783'ry"457_ 0.0235884296 0.027913_21_62 0.0253671498 0.0341566540 0.0259987277 0.0230196849 0.0233151075 0.0276536739 0.0230524492 17 0.0000299603 0.0284521292 0.0257918887 0.0254516532 0.0175637044 0.0244970846 0.0206833627 0.0146346390 0.0197956396 0.0052258132 0.0206748599 0.0205906442 0.0138452217 18 0.0000127409 0.0223495088 0.0235346359**0.0~78388819.** 0.0201192241 0.0250480695 0.0266888558 0.0401958334 0.0193740288 ' 0.0037212159 0.0155464816 0.0235865809 O • .Q1000664-60 19 0.0000055369 0.0173442895 0.0180210184 0.0137484377 0.0225790392 0.0366610768 0.0301447753 0.0342277190 0.0227335396 0.0175775477 0.0203628520 0.0264703224 0.0098603738 20 0.0000022027

. 0.0152297851 '0.0181690349 ' 0.01590(2833 0.0226407923 0.0281971934 0.0173882093 0.0270081845 0.0289395633 0.0183874556 0.0265944575 0.0265427135 0.0095755112 21 0.0000010015 0.0106528198 0.0172809355 0.0149982956 0.0212965445 0.0224413685 0.0209032932 0.0367430589 0.0255089927 0.0121624816 0.0238465850 0.0249667984 0.0083402541 22 0.0000005320 0. 0089665694 0.0116933097 0.0120440859 0,0221366577 0.0207614938 0.0211741003 0.02942:41579 0.0211707159 0.0029207200 0.0232916866 0.0259516972 0.0021970287 23 0.0000002372 0.0070661920 0.0112862641 _0.0090898762 0.0187753208 0.0176845935 0.0186862600 0.0367365508 0.0255742899 0.0006595597 0.0173635700 0.0220110680 0.0022815392 24 0.0000001072 0.0058081957 0.0088069864 0.0089762527 0.0165801584 0,0153441343 0.0162223474 0.0195371739 0.0181341022 0.0013228019 0.0186391363**0.019437588~** 0.00289470e5 25 0.0000000515 0.0040951795 0.0066607460 0.0056811726 0.0130464803 0.0119613578 0.0125269842 0.0202862884 0.0101534224 0.0013255722 0.0189070434 0.0152949162 0.0014963357 26 0.0000000201 0.0023018656 0.0042184725 0.0042040677 0.0052066606 0.0114707358 0.0046276161 0.0058785937 0.0158244798 0.0000000000 0.0123859355 0.0061039775 0.0003051544 27 0.0000000084 0.0015256551 0.0029603316 0.0036359505 0.0044375500 0.0062552616 0.0034269422 0.0066192300 0.0082431519 0.0005853113 0.0073123264 0.0052023202 0.0002365920 28 0.0000000046 0.0016327186 0.0021832445 0.0031-814567 o·.oo38534093 0.0027153367 0.0040227141 0.0058648852 0.0078447522 0.0004224309 0.0040199156 0.004517.5071 0.0007539156 29 0.0000000027 0.0015256551 0.0007770870 0.0004544938 0.0050202650 0.0073813428 0.0039557847 0.0014702211 0.0082910352 0.0000000000 0.0005297244 0.0058854602 0.0002483418 30 0.0000000060 0.0130349830 0.0146906454 0.0122713328 0.0041641999 0.0025473919 0.0046291194 0.0021486392 0.0093642209 0.0005969550 0.0069720059 0.0048818593 0.0002641374
Source: Quality assured vehicle registration data for Vigo County for source types 21, 32, and 32. MOVES201 Oa default distributions for all other source types.Appendix C

Populations

Annual Populations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020_ 2021 _2022 2023 _2024

___ 2025 2026

__ 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 11

1,652 1,651 1,651 1,650 1,649 1,648 1,648 1,647 1,646 1,64_5 1_,645 1,644 1,643 1,642 1_,642 1,641 J,640 1,640 1,639 1,638 1,637 1,637 1,636 1,635 j,634 1,634 1,633 1,632 1,631 1,631 1,630 1.629 1,629 21

39,546 39,528 39,510 39,493 39,475 39,457 39,440 39,422 _39,404 39,387 39,369 39,351 39,334 _39,316**39~299** 39,281 39,263 39,246 39,228 39,211 39,193 39,176 39,158 39,141 39,123 39,106 39,088 39,071 _39,053 39,036 39,018 39,001 38,983 31

29,031 29,018 29,005 28,992 28,9_79 28,967 28,954 28,941 28,928 28,915 28_,902 28,889 28,876 28,863 28,850 28,837 28,824 28,811 28,7_98 28,786 28,7.73 28,760 28,747 28,734 28,721 28,708 28,696 28,683 28,6?',0 ' 28,657 28,644 28,631 28,619 32

8,888 8,884 8,880 8,876 8,873 8,869 8,865 8,861 8,857 8,853 8,849_ 8,845 8,841_ 8,837_ 8,833 8,829 8,825 8,821 8,817 8,813 8,809 8,805 8,801 8,797 8,793 8,790 _8;;:s6 8,782 8,"V8 8,774 8,770 8,766 8,762 41

31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 ,31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 42

16 16 '16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 _-16

16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Source Types 43 51

214 9 213 9 213 9 213 9 213 9 213 9 213 -g 213 9 213 9 213 9 213 -g 212 9 212

- 9

__ 212 9 212

___9 212 212 212 212 212 212_ 212 211 211 211

__ 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 211 9 9,

---- 9

__ _ 9 9 9 9 9 9 '' 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 52

640 640 639 639 639 638 638 638 638 637 637

__ 637 637 636 636 636 635 ----635 635 635 634 634 634 633 633 633 633 632 632 632 6$2 631 631 53

82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82

___ _82

__ 82:.

_ 82

__ 82 _82_ 82 82 82 81 81 81

__81 81 81 81 81:.,. 81 81 81 81 54

148 148 1:48 148 148 148 148 148 147 147 147 147 147- 147 ,147

__ 147 147 14'Z _147 147 147 147 147 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 61

722 722 721 721 721 720 720 720 719 719 719 718 718 _718

--- _718 62

864 863 863 863 862 862 861 861 861 860 860 860 859 859

__ 858 717

______________ 858

_

_ _?'_17_

---- 858_ 7_17 716 716 716 715 715 715 '71_4

714 714 713 713 713 713 712 712 857 857 857 856 856 855 855 855-, 854 854 854 ,.853 853 852 852 852

Source: Quality assured vehicle registration data for Vigo County for source types 21, 32, and 32, MOVES2010a default mileage accumulation rates for all other source types. Population growtl1 factors are taken from local socioeconomic data forecasts.Appendix D Vigo County Meteorological Data: monthiD zoneiD HouriD temperature reiHumidity 7 181670 1 69.8 87.2 7 181670 2 68.5 91.2 7 181670 3 67.5 94.4 7 181670 4 66.8 96.9 7 181670 5 66.2 98.8 7 181670 6 65.6 100.0 7 181670 7 65.0 100.0 7 181670 8 65.5 100.0 7 181670 9 68.3 92.1 7 181670 10 72.7 79.1 7 181670 11 77.3 67.9 7 181670 12 81.2 59.7 7 181670 13 84.6 53.4 7 181670 14 86.5 50.4 7 181670 15 87.1 49.3 7 181670 16 87.3 49.0 7 181670 17 86.8 49.8 7 181670 18 85.5 51.9 7 181670 19 83.3 55.7 7 181670 20 80.4 61.2 7 181670 21 77.5 67.3 7 181670 22 75.0 73.1 7 181670 23 73.3 77.6 7 181670 24 71.5 82.4

Source: Mobile 6.2 reported meteorological data from Appendix C of the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8wHour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, Vigo County, Indiana prepared by IDEM on October, 2005 converted using EPA data converter.Appendix E
Indiana Default VMT Distributions by Vehicle Type and Road Type:

Road Light Duty Single Unit Combination Type Motorcycle Passen!ler Car Truck Bus Truck Truck 2 0.007033832 0.506408086 0.163786651 0.004174166 0.007773053 0.310824213 3 0.001733929 0.659751199 0.225767175 0.000793168 0.010963315 0.100991214 4 0.003973041 0.569953374 0.254198647 0.002831718 0.009082816 0.159960404 5 0.002785022 0.702754695 0.245240087 0.001402085 0.009764356 0.038053756

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department ofTransportation traffic count data.Appendix F
Indiana Default Hourly Distribution Factors for Road Type 2- Rural Restricted Access: Source Types Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 1 0.0125903247 0.0101219844 0.0084967341 0.0084967341 0.0254913340 0.0254913340 0.0254913340 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0197906895 0.0197906895 2 0.0104070951 0.0069241973 0.0066421955 0.0066421955 0.0269500431 0.0269500431 0.0269500431 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0212124099 0.0212124099 3 0.0098043179 0.0056567534 0.0061275627 0,0061275627 0.0231103443 0.0231103443 0.0231103443 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0201622890 0.0201622890 4 0.0140329469 0.0069658232 0.0084286563 0.0084286563 0.0234460042 0.0234460042 0.0234460042 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0213065902 0.0213065902 5 0.0165212405 0.0100941552 0.0134026652 0.0134026652 0.0244090660 0.0244090660 0.0244090660 0.0174195788 0.0174195788 0.0174195788 0.01?:4195788 0.0250478552 0.0250478552 6 0.0312047458 0.0241732202 0.0316551315 0.0316551315 0.0322923692 0.0322923692 0.0322923692 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0304976568 0.0304976568 7 0.0399082603 0,0390974746 0.0481531313 0.0481531313 0.0302344914

. 0.0302344914 0.0302344914 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0339947725 0.0339947725 8 0.0482864956 0.0528758381 0.0535145983 0.0535145983 0.0386071681 0.0386071681 0.0386071681 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0383435322 0.0383435322 9 .0.04_72316355 0.0493101459 0.0541442978 0.0541442978 0.0454144773 0.0454144773 0.0454144773 0.0647383083 0.0647383083 0.0647383083 0,0647383083 0.0447350945 0.0447350945 10 0.0521292001 0.0488627065 0.0570682751 0.0570682751 0.0533197396 0.0533197396 0.0533197396 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0517738130 0.0517738130 11 0.0559204481 0.0513700269 0.0575854739 0.0575854739 0.0576707709 0.0576707709 0.0576707709 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0557712484 0.0557712484 12 0.0572822100 0.0533048469 0.0582753930 0.0582753930 0.0549541212 0.0549541212 0.0549541212 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0571435296 0.0571435296 13 0.0592008057 0.0551586141 0.0599414146 0.0599414146 0.0541541840 0.0541541840 0.0541541840 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0567014536 0.0567014536

. 14 0.0615145144 0.0595500442 0.0635019874 0.0635019874 0.0570747392 0.0570747392 0.0570747392 O.D746488056 0.0746488056 0.0746488056 0.0746488056 0.0567500887 0.0567500887 15 0.0647783324 0.0662712693 0.0683897966 0.0683897966 0.0551925339 0.0551925339 0.0551925339 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0578234055 0.0578234055 16 0.0713500739 0.0764876319 0.0772110428 0.0772110428 0.0551956709 0.0551956709 0.0551956709 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0577540296 0.0577540296 17 ·. 0.0754978425 0.0847160034 0.0792545794 0.0792545794 0.0557979766 0.0557979766 0.0557979766 0.05347_12990 0.0534712990 0.0534712990 0.0534712990 0.0562910814 0,0562910814 18 0,0693763461 0.0821220539 0.0693254052 0.0693254052 0.0501011685 0.0501011685 0.0501011685 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0527021980 0.0527021980 19 0.0542187052 0.0620082513 0.0521045300 0.0521045300 0.0459665909 0.0459665909 0.0459665909 0,0363413126 0.0363413126 0.0363413126 0,0363413126 0.0502215100 0.0502215100 20 0.0432143461 0.0459015588 0.0390794599 0.0390794599 0.0462959768 0.0462959768 0.0462959768 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0467116534 0.0467116534 21 0.0358137860- 0.0372595462 0.0311015284 0.0311015284 0.0418602463 0.0418602463 0.0418602463 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0421311043 0.0421311043 22 0.0294294934 0.0312744978 0.0249803003 0.0249803003 0.0366496745 0.0366496745 0.0366496745 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0381387483 0.0381387483 23 0.0223450238 0.0235734666 0.0182964081 0.0182964081 0.0347517842 0.0347517842 0.0347517842 0,0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0342326572 0.0342326572 24 0.0179418099 0.0169198902 0.0133194323 0.0133194323 0.0310595247 0.0310595247 0.0310595247 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0307625891 0.0307625891

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data.d' D I H I 

### o· 'b In 1ana efaut ounv J 1stn ut10n F actors for R T oad IVDe3- R ural 

### u nrestncted Access: Source Types Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 1 0.0040299464 0.0073183989 0.0054636028 0.0054636028 0.0036998387 0.0036998387 0.0036998387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0164160879 0.0164160879 2 0.0040299464 0.0041131835 0.0034619242 0.0034619242 0.0045536477 0.0045536477 0.0045536477 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0167510731 0.0167510731 3 0.0041817017 0.0032797517 0.0030691885 0.0030691885 0.0046485153 0.0046485153 0.0046485153 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 O.Q165479051 0.0165479051 4 0.0053114356 0.0057247729 0.0048082254 0.0048082254 0.0039844417 0.0039844417 0.0039844417 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0195836328 0.0195836328 5 0.0140963815 0.0151258840 0.0143177758 0.0143177758 0.0082534864 0.0082534864 0.0082534864 0.0153176438 0.0153176438 0.0153176438**0.01531~6438** 0.0258467673 0.0258467673 6 0.0292719118 0.0316782840 0.0354335195 0.0354335195 0.0293141068 0.0293141068 0.0293141068 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0344245647 0.0344245647 7 0,0397598894 0,0468485516 0.0516314034 0.0516314034 0.0496157860 0.0496157860 0.0496157860 0,0557776279 0,0557776279 0.0557776279 0.0557776279 0.0440469233 0.0440469233 8 0.0448183995 0.0633910409 0,0636260878 0,0636260878 0.0768428043 0.0768428043 0.0768428043 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0512793380 0.0512793380

.. 9 0.0370114322 0.0460357746 0.0558633273**~** 0.0558633273 0.1049236315 0.1049236315 0.1049236315 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0568238265 0.0568238265 10 0.0416989849 0.0427840868 0.0547852386 0.0547852386 0.1065363817 0.1065363817 0.1065363817 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0599756501 0.0599756501 11 0.0509391967 0.0444183487 0.0568454275 0.0568454275 0.1186794422 0.1186794422 0.1186794422 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0633505956 0.0633505956 12 0.0563855259 0.0512966366 0.0618918527 0.0618918527 0.1154539418 0.1154539418 0.1154539418 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0635864154 0.0635864154 13 0.0638721209 0.0537246907 0.0610818211**~0.061081821~** 0.0999905132 ,0.0999905132 0.0999905132 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0644099711 0.06440997'11 14 0.0708697265 0.0545001954 0.0632013074 0.0632013074 0.0864244379 0.0864244379 0.0864244379 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0637040231 0.0637040231 15 ,0.0774626513 0.0656899700 0.0681384267 0.0681384267 0.0592922873 0.0592922873 0.0592922873 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0609657913 0.0609657913 16 0.0849155229 0.0775959037 0.0765115831 0.0765115831 0.0295038421 0.0295038421 0.0295038421 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0570058311 0.0570058311 17 0.0916096179 0.0871890696**0.07960~4405** 0.0796014405 0.0317806660 0.0317806660 0.0317806660 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0517440242 0.0517440242 18 0.0855899909 0.0856725476 0.0737419189 0.0737419189 0.0184043260 0.0184043260 0.0184043260 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0467760851 0.0467760851 19 0.0685259502 0.0056330958 p.05452727,51 0.05452727_51_

.. 0.0120481928

.. 0.0120481928 0.0120481928**0.01877448~5** 0.0187744815 0.018'7744815 0.0187744815 0.0413_186686**0.04~.3~** 86686 20 0.0503658989 0.0457301992 0.0390975413 0.0390975413 0.0118584575 0.0118584575 0.0118584575 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0364127078 0.0364127078 21

.... 0.0353421239_ -.**0,~_0002_1,9~'** -**,0.0294058~]~** ...**,0,.0294058~]1** . ..**0.00967650~3.** 0.0096765013 0.0096765013**~'** 0.0106166656 0.0106166656 0.01 06166656**0.0106~_66656** - ..**0.03~88829_15 0.03_1_8882~15**  22 0.0217853168 0.0289018238 0.0218457686 0.0218457686 0,0061663979 0.0061663979 0.0061663979 0.0079972816 0.0079972816 0,0079972816 0.0079972816 0.0290264055 0.0290264055 23

. 0.01_1_93_80838

__ -- 0.0205028665

...0.01;36731866 ·--· 0.0,1.36731.866

.. 0.0048382506 0.0048382506 0.0048382506 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 _0.0255574344_ 0.02555743!1-4 24 0.0061882440 0.0127827290 0.0079763402 0.0079763402 0.0035101034 0.0035101034 0.0035101034 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0225579868 0.0225579868

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data.Indiana Default Hourtv Distribution Factors for Road Tvpe 4 -Urban Restricted Access: Source Types Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 1 0.0114838630 0.0104500369 0.0090397680 0.0090397680 0.0186488577 0.0186488577 0.01864B8577, 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0194173119 0.0194173119 2 0.0071800855 0.0062500477 0.0056304309 0.0056304309 0.0163411464 0.0163411464 0.0163411464 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0198708197 0.0198708197 3 0.0063691205 0.0049689741 0.0046493622 0.0046493622 0.0157775876 0.0157775876 0.0157775876 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0186489893 0.0186489893 4 0.0073777516 0.0058427101 0.0058801326 0.0058801326 0.0161766037 0.0161766037 0.0161766037 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0198231326 0.0198231326 5 0,0108139353 0.0098545059 0.0108999000 0.0108999000 0.0221330492 0.0221330492

.. 0.0221330492 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0,0232515449 0.0232515449 6 0.0235457656 0.0231603609 0.0263517526 0.0263517526 0.0299755654 0.0299755654 0.0299755654 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0294638153 0.0294638153 7 0.0461.747881 0.0495085217 0.0542414568 0.0542414568 0.0393812372 0,0393812372 0.0393812372 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0375553768 0.0375553768 8 0.0567226756 0.0788353145 0.0674512195 0.0674512195 0.0503870867 0.0503870867 0.0503870867 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0446175773 0.0446175773

.. 9 0.0493171440 0.0638279223 0.0614111771 0.0614111771 0.0589556475 0.0589556475 0.0589556475 0.0756333178 0.0756333178 0.0756333178 _0.07_56333178 _0.0515843704 0.0515843704 10 0.0406144957 0.0466481655 0.0536303211 0.0536303211 0.0581555587 0.0581555587 0.0581555587 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0553194565 0.0553194565 11 0.0415130748 0.0428102606 0.0512594850 0.0512594850 0.0616027281 0.0616027281 0.0616027281 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0583081277 0.0583081277 12 0.0465166969 0.0452333632 0.0529793024 0.0529793024 0.0644246353 0.0644246353 0.0644246353 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0589378233 0.0589378233 13

. 0.0517959830 0.0478487216 0.0547982766 0.0547982766 0.0637644078 0.0637644078 0.0637644078 0.0808088903 0.0808088903 o.o8080S8903 0.0808088903 0.0575925555 0,0575925555 14 0.0566713893 0.0502151226 0.0576880799 0.0576880799 0.0625591325 0.0625591325 0.0625591325 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0571667797 0.0571667797 15 0.0671882913 0.0580384620 0.0656779676 ,0.0656779576 0.0619482678 0.0619482678 0.0619482678 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 o:o573429674 0.0573429674 16 0.0810035452 0.0715596945 0.0786905659 0.0786905659 0.0609466141 0.0609466141 0.0609466141 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0567213465 0.0567213465 17 0.0863864724 ,0;0838541123 0.0821371575 0.0821371575 0.0577256909 0.0577256909 0.0577256909 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0,0551911545 0.0551911545 18 0.0843264717 0.0874512168 0.0756929494 0.0756929494 0.0510164625 0.0510164625 0.0510164625 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0531125437 0.0531125437 19

...... 0.0645951265

. . 0_.06.0:4_364;374 ' 0.0543673700

. 0.0543673700 0.0450990958

.. 0.0450990958 0.0450990958 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0487_1.99307 0.04871,99307 20 0.0469536991 0.0424749554 0.0373951308 0.0373951308 0.0384927066 0.0384927066 0.0384927066 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0432101938 0.0432101938 21 0.0373781148 0.0353280630**0.029318~427** 0.0293181427 0.0322318571 0.0322318571 0.0322318571 0.0162446774 0.0162446774 0.0162446774,**0.016244677~** 0.0390319248 0.039031:9248 22 0.0316564842 0.0313403787 0.0249971308 0.0249971308 0.0282046747 0.0282046747 0.0282046747 0.0142456600 0.0142456600 0.0142456600. 0.0142456600. 0.0355118446 0.0355118446 23 _0.0245992722

.. 0.0251562568 0.0203505544

. 0.0203505544 0.0242700475 0.0242700475 0.0242700475 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.031771.165'(' ..0.0317711657 24 0.0198157539 0.0189063955 0.0154623663 0.0154623663 0.0217813392 0.0217813392 0.0217813392 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0278292477 0.0278292477

Source: Statewide averages developed from ll"'diana Department of Transportation traffic count data.n tana efaut ounv. tstn ut10n F actors for R dT oa 1voe 5 -Urban Unrestncted Access: Source Types Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 1 0.0092279794 0.0085268711. 0.0060669694 0.0060669694 0.0126828270 0.0126828270

- 0.0126828270 0.0037158531 0.0037158531 0.0037158531 0.00371'58531 0.0106396358 0.0106396358 2 0.0055316691 0.0048527626 0.0037675180 0.0037675180 0.0099485186 0.0099485186 0.0099485186 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0124309233 0.0124309233 3 0.0047273286 0.0037895145 0.0033129405 0.0033129405 0.0069482800 0.0069482800 0.0069482800 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0121505035 0.0121505035 4 0.0047017359 0,0044201159 0,0042394230 0,0042394230 0.0113599945 0.0113599945 0.0113599945 0,0056282193 0,0056282193 0.0056282193 0.0056282193 0.0144699998 0.0144699998 5 0.0081859928 0.0079416389 0.0087215410 0.0087215410 0.0153898606 0.0153898606 0.0153898606 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0210508569 0.0210508569 6 0.0225361588 0.0203863353 0.0238668712 0.0238668712 0.0256929528 0.0256929528 0.0256929528 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0299165403 0.0299165403 7 0.0435184779 0.0478282898 0.0541952158 0.0541952158 0.0448331117 0.0448331117 0.0448331117 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0436775030 0.0436775030 8 0.0602121997 0.0721456866 0.0675347974 0.0675347974 0.0691895946 0.0691895946 0.0691895946 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0588646978 0.0588646976 9 0.0556311148 0.0567013667 0.0643860182 0.0643660182 0.0747059425 0.0747059425 0.0747059425 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0640862836 0.0640862836 10 0.0485821670 0.0466493163 0.0603283916 0.0603283916 0.0803995772 0.0803995772 0.0803995772 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0680944168 0.0680944168 11 0,0495985610 0.0468148434 0.0590657789 0.0590657789 0.0774061573 0.0774061573 0.0774061573 0.0943973720 0.0943973720 0,0943973720 0.0943973720 0.0703404942 0.0703404942 12 0.0573056055 0.0516032787 0.0615645883 0.0615645883 0.0753332651 0.0753332651 0.0753332651 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0698309800 0.0698309800 13 0.0607752380 0.0555323143 0.0626732860 0.0626732860 0.0739763390 0.0739763390 0.0739763390 0.0895629476 0.0895629476 0.0895629476 0,0895629476 0.0685413889 0.0685413889 14 0.0609214817 0.0562211160 0.0629887267 0.0629887267 0.0779993863 0.0779993863 0.0779993863 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0671175363 0.0671175363 15 0.0649907135 0.0607579027 0.0667909366 0.0667909366 0.0761037810 0.0761037810 0.0761037810 0.0905726397 0.0905726397 0.09057'26397 0.0905726397 0.0651260461 0.0651260461 16 0.0724418316 0.0715477952 0.0751790074 0.0751790074 0.0728035185 0.0728035185 0.0728035185 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0605241028 0.0605241028 17 0.0773519648 0.0803647101 0,0757034489 0.0757034489 0.0526405510 0.0526405510 0.0526405510 0,0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0557685235 0.0557685235 18 0,0770777578 0.0832250581 0.0684911688 0.0684911688 0.0347686748 0.0347686748 0.0347686748 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0506461891 0.0506461891 19 0.0635977420 0.0637849687 0.0526386278 0.0526386278 0.0285090860 0.0285090860 0.0285090860 0.0}73341336

... O.-Q1_73341336 0.0173341336 ;0.0173341336 0.0402747366 0.0402747366 20 0.0483079600 0.0462284324 0.0372839274 0.0372839274 0.0220585728 0.0220585728 0.0220585728 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0310667712 0.0310667712 21 0.0383158572 0.0386568197 0.0292289942

. 0.0292289942 0.0174082029 0.0_1,74082029 0.0174082029

. 0.00?6615624' 0.0076615624 0.0076615624 ,0.00766f5624, 0.0268533367 0,0268533367 22 0.0305027859 0.0325107827 0.0236169348 0.0236169348 0.0137124544 0.0137124544 0.0137124544 0,0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0231915644 0.0231915644 23 0.0214502991 0.0236017051 0.0170601049 0.0170601049 0.0139442910 0.0139442910 0,0139442910 0.0053276381 0.0053276381 0.005327638, 0,0053276381 0,0193751364. .0.0193751364,_. 24 0.0145073780 0.0159083752 0.0113147831 0.0113147831 0.0121850602 0.0121850602 0.0121850602 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0159618330 0.0159618330

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data.Appendix G


### I d' (; 

### ., D. 'b · n 1ana De ault Dally 1stn utwn Factors: dayiD monthiD 2 5 1 0.2325411725 0.7674588275 2 0.2380547378 0. 7619452622 3 0.2393402049 0.7606597951 4 0.2396052454 0. 7603947546 5 0.2484757701 0.7515242299 6 0.2489743665 0.7510256335 7 0.2481153021 0.751884697.9 8 0.2527028648 0.7472971352 9 0.2496078420 0. 7503921580 10 0.2462808693 0.7537191307 11 0.2439742406 0.7560257594 12 0.2258784720 0.7741215280

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data.Appendix H

Indiana Default Monthly Distribution Factors: mont hiD monthVMTFraction 1 0.0733424010 2 0.0693661929 3 0.0827036024 4 0.0831789580 5 0.0891346903 6 0.0888150873 7 0.0907968617 8 0.0918542094 9 0.0854175366 10 0.0875162272 11 0.0812354405 12 0.0766387926
Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data.Appendix I Vigo County Ramp Fractions:

Road Type 2 4 Ramp Fraction O% 5.73%

Source: Analysis of VHT from the Terre Haute travel demand model.

# AppendixB

Vigo, Indiana, Maintenance Area

Interagency Consultation Group Meeting Minutes/Summary

### This page left intentionally blank

### Interagency Consultation Group (ICG) Conference Call Minutes

For the MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB Replacement Update Related to the Vigo County, Indiana, Maintenance Area under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard

ICG Conference Call Date and Time

• February 13,2013 at 1pm Eastem

ICG Attendees

• Shawn Seals (IDEM), Anthony Maietta (EPA),Greg Katter (INDOT), Larry Heil (FHW A), Ron Hinsenkamp (WCIEDD), Dan White (WCIEDD), Seyed Shokouhzadeh (EMPO), and Vishu Lingala (EMPO)

ICG Discussion Topics and Conclusions

1. For the PM2
. 5 

### MVEB Replacement submittal, various mobile source margins of safety were discussed. A. 

### After discussion, the consensus of the ICG was that as long as the a 15% mobile source margin of safety for VOC and NOx emissions does not result in
an exceedance of the all sources margins of safety, it was reasonable and appropriate for inclusion in MVEB replacement submittal.



### B-1

### This page intentionally left blank.