alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Cambodia

126 items

        -    Report  		Cambodia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Cambodia (16-1223.1) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  December 23, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Colombia/PRM Program Building Capacity of Municipalities to Assist Internally Displaced Persons [Archive]	  April 8, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Cambodia (13-806.1) – Agreement Amending and Extending Memorandum of Understanding for Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from Cambodia from the Bronze Age through the Khmer Era	  August 6, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Cambodia (06-714) – Trade and Investment Framework Agreement	  July 14, 2006 

previous page1…10111213next page

Back to Top
HomeIndia

# India

438 items

        -    		Pijush Kanti  Sarkar	  January 22, 2002 
        -    		Anup Kumar  Mondal	  January 22, 2002 
        -    		Suresh Chandra  Hembram	  January 22, 2002 
        -    		Ujjal  Barman	  January 22, 2002 
        -    		SK. Asraf  Ali	  January 22, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Pijush Kanti Sarkar	  January 22, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Anup Kumar Mondal	  January 22, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Suresh Chandra Hembram	  January 22, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Ujjal Barman	  January 22, 2002 
        -    DS Memorial  		Sk. Ashraf Ali	  January 22, 2002 

previous page1…41424344next page

Back to Top
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Christian GUZMAN, aka "Green Eyes", Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-1470.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 26, 2001.

*110Neil B. Checkman, N.Y., NY, for appellant.

Marc L. Greenwald, Ass’t U.S. Att’y, SDNY, N.Y., NY, for appellee.

Present VAN GRAAFEILAND, KEARSE, and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Defendant Christian Guzman appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York following a jury trial before Peter K. Leisure, *Judge,*convicting him of possessing and conspiring to possess cocaine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and sentencing him principally to 360 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by a 10-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Guzman argues that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his sentence should be vacated on the ground that his sentence was calculated under the Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) on the basis of narcotics quantities not determined by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

The sentence imposed on Guzman did not exceed the statutory maximum for his offense, and the *Apprendi*principle that certain findings must be made by a jury is inapplicable for two reasons. First, the calculation of Guzman’s criminal history category was based on his prior convictions; *Apprendi*itself states that the finding as to a defendant’s prior convictions need not be made by a jury. *See*120 S.Ct. at 2362. Second, to the extent that the calculation of Guzman’s offense level was based on the quantity of narcotics attributable to him, we have held that that is a matter to be decided by the sentencing judge, not one that *Apprendi*requires be decided by a jury. *See United States v. Garcia,*240 F.3d 180 (2d Cir.2001).

*111We have considered all of Guzman’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
#### § 598.312 Property; property interest.

The terms *property* and *property interest* include but are not limited to money, checks, drafts, bullion, bank deposits, savings accounts, debts, indebtedness, obligations, notes, guarantees, debentures, stocks, bonds, coupons, any other financial instruments, bankers acceptances, mortgages, pledges, liens or other rights in the nature of security, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, trust receipts, bills of sale, any other evidences of title, ownership, or indebtedness, letters of credit and any documents relating to any rights or obligations thereunder, powers of attorney, goods, wares, merchandise, chattels, stocks on hand, ships, goods on ships, real estate mortgages, deeds of trust, vendors' sales agreements, land contracts, leaseholds, ground rents, real estate and any other interest therein, options, negotiable instruments, trade acceptances, royalties, book accounts, accounts payable, judgments, patents, trademarks or copyrights, insurance policies, safe deposit boxes and their contents, annuities, pooling agreements, services of any nature whatsoever, contracts of any nature whatsoever, and any other property, real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible, or interest or interests therein, whether present, future, or contingent.
#### Adrian SWAREZ, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT etc., Appellee.

No. II-248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 3, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 21, 1978.

*834William G. Babcock, Gainesville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Horace Schow, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the order of the trial court denying petition for writ of habeas corpus finding that petitioner “has failed to establish that the disciplinary proceedings taken against him were such as to deny him due process of law.”

Petitioner, appellant herein, forfeited 200 days of gain time and was sentenced to disciplinary confinement for a period not to exceed 90 days, as a result of being found guilty of involvement in a disturbance at Raiford. The charges against appellant were unarmed assault, participating in a disturbance and disorderly conduct.

The record establishes that appellant was furnished with a copy of the disciplinary report containing the charges against him and that a disciplinary hearing, at which petitioner was allowed to call a witness, was duly held. Appellant was identified by a number of eyewitnesses as the inmate who struck Officer Morris. Appellant has not denied the assault, but contends that his procedural rights were violated by appel-lee’s failure to call all of the witnesses he requested and failure to furnish copies of the report of investigation or incident reports as well as written reports of the evidence against him.

On consideration of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, we find that respondent’s failure to call all witnesses requested does not violate petitioner’s basic rights1 or the Florida Administrative Code.2 Appellant was furnished with a copy of the charges against him in advance of the hearing and was informed of the information contained in the reports. In view of the possible risk of reprisal against inmates and officers who are witnesses to the disturbance, further disclosure was not required. Finally, we note that appellant’s attack on the impartiality of the panel is patently devoid of merit.

Accordingly, the judgment below is AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

1

. *Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 566-569, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974).

2

. Fla.Admin.Code § 33-3.08(13)(i).
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Bureau of Arms Control Verification and Compliance  Releases

# Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Releases

124 items

        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Japan Extended Deterrence Dialogue	  December 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to The Hague	  November 24, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Launch Using Ballistic Missile Technology by North Korea	  November 22, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board Releases Report on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Associated Technologies on Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Verification	  November 16, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board Releases Report on Deterrence in a World of Nuclear Multipolarity	  November 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Rolls Out the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomy	  November 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Announcing the Renaming of the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance to the Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability	  November 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Mallory Stewart’s Meeting with the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director-General of Arms Control Sun Xiaobo	  November 7, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Russia’s Planned Withdrawal of Its CTBT Ratification	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 2, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Fact Sheet: The Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy	  November 1, 2023 

previous page12345…13next page

Back to Top
#### Leo SELKOWITZ and Jeanne Selkowitz, his wife, Appellants, v. Leon GROSSMAN, Appellee.

No. 74-1378.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 23, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Order entered December 12, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00750 - CV NELLY SUAREZ GARCIA , Appellant

V. LORRIE SEMLER , Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 20 - 04494

O RDER On our own motion, we ORDER the clerk to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record in the above

- referenced case, trial court case number DC

- 20

- 04494 ( 14 th District Court of Dal las County, Texas), co ntaining the following documents:

• Any supersedeas bond or document regarding a deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond filed in the case, including any supersedeas bond or deposit documentation filed on or about August 27 , 2021
. The cl erk shall file the supplemental clerk’s record within 7 days from the date of this order
.. /s/ LANA MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,823                  14,823
<SECURITIES>                                    25,961                  25,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,393                   7,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,234                  50,234
<PP&E>                                           7,951                   7,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,366                   2,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,992                  55,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,350                  24,350
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            87                      87
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,505                  31,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,992                  55,992
<SALES>                                         10,715                  20,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,715                  20,464
<CGS>                                            3,297                   6,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,372                  19,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    887                   2,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                       266                     846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                621                   1,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       621                   1,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07                    0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07                    0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### § 588.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
# Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Releases

4513 items

        -    Report  		Germany	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Spain	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Georgia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Slovakia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		France	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Serbia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Finland	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		San Marino	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Estonia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…446447448449450…452next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 45223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review; Group Neuroscience Review Subcommittee.
    Date: November 16-17, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel--Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 2081, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a28283f302b390a272b232664242322642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd9d9cec1dac8fbd6dad2d795d5d2d395dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: August 24, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-20865 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.28 Recovery or receipt of bond before or after relief is granted.

(a) If a bond reported lost, stolen, destroyed, or not received, is recovered or received before relief is granted, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328, must be notified promptly.

(b) A bond for which relief has been granted is the property of the United States and, if recovered, must be promptly submitted to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, 26106-1328, for cancellation.
# C_2005166EN.01001801.xml

| 7.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3819 — DaimlerChrysler/MAV)

(2005/C 166/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3819. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3819. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 583.304 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support* means any property, tangible or intangible, including currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this section means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                       597
<INVENTORY>                                     12,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,454
<PP&E>                                          36,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           344
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,676
<SALES>                                         18,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,828
<CGS>                                           10,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                       601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,168
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
#### Daniel P. BEAL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 21, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
§ 539.502 Effect of license. ( a ) No license contained in this part, or otherwise issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control pursuant to this part, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of the license, unless the prior transaction is specifically authorized in such license.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license is issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part authorizes any transaction prohibited by any provision of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license specifically refers to such provision.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction otherwise prohibited by this part has the effect of removing from the transaction a prohibition or prohibitions contained in this part, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest that would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law in or with respect to any property.