alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





I, Robert K. Grunewald, certify that:

1.       I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2019 of Flat Rock Capital Corp.;

2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|Date:	April 29, 2020 | /s/ Robert K. Grunewald                                                                                                                    
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Robert K. GrunewaldChief Executive Officer
                                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
40483.

#### CLOSE et al. v. RAPE.

Decided February 11, 1964

Rehearing denied February 28, 1964.

*232
      *J. Walter LeCraw,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Greer, Hall & Morris, Paul R. Koehler, Richard G. Greer,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs in error contend that the petition as amended was subject to their general demurrers because it failed to allege such facts as how close the defendants’ automobile was being driven behind the automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger; the legal speed at the place of the collision; the speed of either of the vehicles-; the conditions then and there prevailing, including the condition of the roadway; whether any signal was given showing that the automobile in which the plaintiff was riding was about to stop; and what happened to the preceding automobile. The above facts are such as can be elicited by means of special demurrers. “As against a general demurrer mere general allegations of negligence are sufficient.” *Ogletree v. Kirven,*104 Ga. App. 433 (1) (121 SE2d 845) and citations; *Davis v. Harrell Concrete Products,*105 Ga. App. 785, 787 (125 SE2d 699) and citations.

*233There is no assignment of error on the overruling of special demurrers. Cases cited which involve special demurrers are not in point. Neither are such cases as *Ingram, v. Greyhound Corp.,*97 Ga. App. 892 (104 SE2d 658) wherein the facts alleged negatived liability on the part of the defendant.

The court did not err in overruling the general demurrers to the petition as amended.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                       913
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                       952
<INVENTORY>                                        312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,454
<PP&E>                                          15,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,202
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,333
<SALES>                                         15,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,557
<CGS>                                           14,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    20
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (563)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (241)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (99)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.44)
        

</TABLE>
EXEMPTION FROM JURY SERVICE.

Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

#### State of Ohio, on the Relation of James O. Cutler and Simeon Nash, v. John B. Miles, as Clerk of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County.

Decided, May 17, 1917.

*Constitutional Law*— Validity *of Amended Section*5211, *Relating to Exemption from Military Service.*

Section 5195 of the revised and recodified military laws of, the state (107 O. L., 387), providing that contributing members of the Ohio National Guard shall be exempt from jury service, is not open to the objection which rendered this provision invalid as it stood in its original form (Section 5211, G. C.), nor is it in conflict with any other constitutional provision but is valid and en-forcible.

Turney, *Olds & Sipe*and *Simeon Nash,*for plaintiff.

*Robert P. Duncan,*contra.

By the Court

(Kunkle, Allread and Ferneding, JJi, concurring) .

This case is submitted to this court upon a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiffs.

. The action involves the constitutionality of the provisions of ■Section 5211, General Code, providing that contributing members to the Ohio National Guard shall be exempt from service as jurors.

*316We have carefully considered the authorities cited in the very exhaustive briefs which have been filed by counsel. We shall not, undertake to discuss in detail these authorities so cited, but will merely announce the conclusion at which we have arrived after a consideration of such authorities. We shall adopt this course for the reason that this case can, and doubtless will, be taken to the Supreme Court where it can be authoritatively reported.

A former act embodying some of the features of the act under consideration was before our Supreme Court in the ease of *Eamann*v. *Heekin,*88 O. S., p. 207, wherein such former act was held unconstitutional.

We have carefully examined the present act in connection with the case above referred to, and are of opinion that the present act does not come within any of the objections made by the Supreme' Court to the former act, nor do we think it conflicts with any provision or limitation of the Constitution.

We appreciate the suggestion of counsel for defendant as to, the wisdom of the exemptions from jury duty provided in this act, but that is a question for consideration by the Legislature rather than by the courts.

Demurrer overruled.
#### WATSON, BLANCHE, WILSON & POSNER v. CHARLES CARTER & COMPANY, INC.

No. 80-C-1379.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1980.

In re National Surety Corporation, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, East Baton Rouge Parish, First Circuit, 385 So.2d 359.

Denied.
Union Calendar No. 421

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2693

[Report No. 104–779]

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to make a

ice road inadvertently included in the wilderness.and Idaho to exclude an established Forest ServHells Canyon Wilderness in the States of Oregonminor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the

SEPTEMBER 9, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 421

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2693

[Report No. 104–779]

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to make a minor adjustment in

the exterior boundary of the Hells Canyon Wilderness in the States

of Oregon and Idaho to exclude an established Forest Service road

inadvertently included in the wilderness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 30, 1995

Mr. COOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

SEPTEMBER 9, 1996

Additional sponsor: Mrs. CHENOWETH

SEPTEMBER 9, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to make a minor

adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Hells Canyon

Wilderness in the States of Oregon and Idaho to exclude

an established Forest Service road inadvertently included

in the wilderness.
2

•HR 2693 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, HELLS CANYON WIL4 DERNESS, HELLS CANYON NATIONAL RECRE5 ATION AREA.

6 The Secretary of Agriculture shall revise the map and

7 detailed boundary description of the Hells Canyon Wilder8 ness designated by section 2 of Public Law 94–199 (16

9 U.S.C. 460gg–1) to exclude Forest Service Road 3965

10 from the wilderness area so that the road may continue

11 to be used by motorized vehicles. The road shall continue

12 to be included in the Hells Canyon National Recreation

13 Area also established by such Act.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Astrogeology Research Program

#### U.S. Geological Survey   Scientific Investigations Map 3018  version 1.0

# Geologic Map of the Meskhent Tessera Quadrangle (V-3), Venus

### *By*Mikhail A. Ivanov and James W. Head, III

### 2008

The Magellan spacecraft orbited Venus from August 10, 1990, until it plunged into the Venusian atmosphere on October 12, 1994. Magellan Mission objectives included (1) improving the knowledge of the geological processes, surface properties, and geologic history of Venus by analysis of surface radar characteristics, topography, and morphology and (2) improving the knowledge of the geophysics of Venus by analysis of Venusian gravity.

The Meskhent Tessera quadrangle is in the northern hemisphere of Venus and extends from lat 50° to 75° N. and from long 60° to 120° E. In regional context, the Meskhent Tessera quadrangle is surrounded by extensive tessera regions to the west (Fortuna and Laima Tesserae) and to the south (Tellus Tessera) and by a large basinlike lowland (Atalanta Planitia) on the east. The northern third of the quadrangle covers the easternmost portion of the large topographic province of Ishtar Terra (northwestern map area) and the more localized upland of Tethus Regio (northeastern map area). 

----

Download this map as an ~47" x 42" PDF document (sim3018_map.pdf; 45.6 MB)

Download the accompanying pamphlet as an 18-page PDF document (sim3018_pamphlet.pdf; 800 kB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Ken Tanaka

Suggested citation and version history

----

Download a free copy of the current version of Adobe Reader.

| Help   | PDF help   | Publications main page | Other Planetary Maps || Geologic   Division | Astrogeology Research Program  |

----

This map is available in paper form from:

USGS Information Services, Box 25286,Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225telephone: (888) ASK-USGS; e-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3018/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Created: August 29, 2008	Page Last Modified: November 10, 2008

----
#### § 560.557 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78477, Dec. 21, 2022]
Exhibit
32.1



Certification
of

Principal
Executive Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Venkata S. Meenavalli, Chief Executive Officer of Longfin Corp. (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:



| | ● | Fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ● | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/
    Venkata S. Meenavalli    
| | ---------------------------------
| | Venkata
    S. Meenavalli        
| | Chief
    Executive Officer      
| | (Principal
    Executive Officer)
| | April
    19, 2018
### •;;FAHTMEM TO F ^i'\NSPORWIO N OCKETOPERATION S SERVED : MARC H 28 , 201 2 m i MA R 2^ 1 P h 3 5 U S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N THEMATTERO F BADGE RHELICOPTERS , INC . FA A DOCKE T N O [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSN O FAA-2012-020 1
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2011AL910019 ) ha s been assigne d t o Administrativ e Law Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s andothe r communication s regardin g this proceedin g shall b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r

person s o

n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativj&^Ta

w Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2012-020 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA Li

& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Michae l Jacob , Presiden t Badge r Helicopters , Inc. , Responden t 2456 4 Hv/y 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 Agne s M . Rodriguez , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Chie f

Counse l Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-726 8 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Advisor : 202-366-213 9 Staf f Assistant/Paralega l 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Ser\'icc wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y e.\pedilec ! courier, use th

e followin g address . Federa

l Aviatio n Adniiiiistratiou , 60

0 Itxdepeudenc

c Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
• • -2

-
NUMBER 13-13-00174-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

GILBERT SANTOS GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 26th District Court 

of Gonzales County, Texas

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez, and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s counsel, Alison Fox Dahlberg, has filed a motion requesting to 

withdraw as counsel. According to her motion to withdraw, good cause exists for her to 

withdraw because she has accepted employment with the Court of Criminal Appeals in 

Austin, Texas. 
2

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel 

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the 

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with 

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of 

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed 

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to 

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge 

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall 

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be 

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly 

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall 

further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the 

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. 

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

1st day of October, 2013.
40121.

#### THOMAS v. INTERSTATE LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

Decided June 27, 1963

Rehearing denied July 29, 1963.

*Guy B. Scott, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Stephens, Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, Edwin Fortson,*contra.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

This case is controlled by the rulings and judgment this day made and entered in the case of *Geeter v. Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co.,*ante.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.*
#### Encarnacion CARRILLO-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 99-71335.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 2000.

Decided Feb. 16, 2001.

As Corrected March 12, 2001.

*410Before B. FLETCHER, O’SCANNLAIN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Encarnación Carrillo-Rivera (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of his final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on June 2, 1999. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated herein except as necessary.

Petitioner was served with an order to show cause (“OSC”) on September 20, 1994 — approximately five years after he entered the United States. At a hearing on March 25, 1997, the Immigration Judge granted Petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation. The Immigration and Naturalization Service appealed to the BIA, On appeal, the BIA determined that Petitioner had failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement before being served with the OSC and thus was statutorily ineligible for suspension.

Petitioner contends that he was eligible for suspension of deportation and challenges the BIA’s decision that the “stop-time rule” — a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 110 Stat. 3009-625 (“IIRIRA”) — bars such relief in his case. Petitioner’s arguments challenging the application of the stop-time rule are foreclosed by our recent decision in *Ram v. INS,*No. 99-70918 (9th Cir. filed Feb. 8, 2001).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
HomeOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues...Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues  Releases

# Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues Releases

123 items

        -    Press Statement  		Commemorating the Days of Holocaust Remembrance	  May 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		State Department Hosts Federal Holocaust Remembrance Program on May 8	  April 29, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		25th Anniversary of the Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art: Best Practices & the Way Forward	  Stuart EizenstatMarch 5, 2024 Tuesday, March 5, 2024, 2:30 p.m. Eastern TimeWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		The Lasting Impact of the Washington Principles and Best Practices for the Restitution of Nazi-Confiscated Art	  Stuart EizenstatMarch 5, 2024United States Holocaust Memorial MuseumWashington, D.C. 
        -    		Best Practices for the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		25th Anniversary of the Washington Principles on Nazi Confiscated Art: Best Practices and the Way Forward	  Ellen GermainMarch 5, 2024United States Holocaust Memorial MuseumWashington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		International Holocaust Remembrance Day	  January 27, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Their Legacy Compels Us to Serve	  January 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Statement on the 80th Anniversary of FDR’s War Refugee Board	  January 25, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Governments Advance Restitution of Assets Seized During the Holocaust	  November 1, 2023 

123…13next page

Back to Top
Filed by OTC Filings Inc. - www.otcedgar.com - 1-866-832-FILE(3453) - Cannabis Science, Inc. - Exhibit 10.2

 

 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
  
 THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT to the Management Agreement dated as of December 7, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into between Cannabis Science, Inc., with its principal offices located at 6946 North Academy Blvd Suite B #254, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918 (the “Company” or “CBIS”) and Adam Pasquale, with an address of Suite #323 2865 South Colorado Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80222 (the “Consultant”), and hereby amends the Management Agreement entered into between CBIS and the Consultant dated as of July 30, 2010 (the "Agreement").
  
 WHEREAS:
  
 A.      The parties entered into the Agreement in order to govern the mutually beneficial relationship of the parties with respect to services for the Company that are performed by the Consultant; and
  
 B.      The parties wish to amend Section 2.1 of the Agreement and to correct the commencement date of the Agreement from July 30, 2010 to May 8, 2010; and 
  
 C.      The parties wish that the remaining terms of the Agreement remain the same.
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
  
 	Section 2.1 shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

  
 2.1       The term of this Agreement shall begin as of May 8, 2010 and shall continue for a period of twelve (12) months or until terminated earlier pursuant to Sections 13 or 14 herein (the “Term”).  Any renewal period for this Agreement shall be at the sole discretion of the Company along with the renewal term including any compensation for services during the renewal term.
  
 	Section 4.2 shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

  
      4.2       Shares and Options.  As further compensation for the provision of the Services, the Company shall grant the Consultant two million (2,000,000) 144-shares of restricted common stock of the Company.  These shares will be issued as an inducement to the Consultant to enter into the Agreement and will be deemed to have been earned by the Consultant as of May 8, 2010.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first written above.
  
 CANNABIS SCIENCE, INC.                                                         CONSULTANT:
                                     
 Per:      /s/  Robert Melamede                                                               /s/  Adam Pasquale                                                                  
 ___________________________                                                      ___________________________
 Dr. Robert Melamede, President                                                          Adam Pasquale