alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Dietrich, Chief Accounting Officer of Dalrada Financial Corporation,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dalrada Financial
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Dalrada Financial
Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Dalrada Financial Corporation's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to Dalrada Financial Corporation's auditors and the audit
committee of Dalrada Financial Corporation's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect Dalrada Financial Corporation 's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Dalrada Financial Corporation's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 22, 2006

/s/ Robert Dietrich
-----------------
Robert Dietrich
Chief Accounting Officer
40714.

#### GRESHAM v. O’REAR.

Pannell, Judge.

1. In the trial of a claim case where the entry of the officer’s levy does not show who was in possession of the property levied on, the burden is on the plaintiff in fi. fa. *Hicks v. Hicks,*193 Ga. 382 (1) (18 SE2d 763). See also *Code*§ 39-904.

2. Evidence of declarations made by the defendant in fi. fa. in her pleadings and testimony in the main case as to her ownership of the property levied upon, it not appearing that at the time she was in possession of the property, have no probative value to prove title in her to the property levied upon. *McSwain v. Estroff,*34 Ga. App. 183 (1, 2) (129 SE 16).

3. Estoppel does not operate as a conveyance of title, *Coursey v. Coursey,*141 Ga. 65, 68 (80 SE 462); *Peacock v. Horne,*159 Ga. 707 (5) (126 SE 813), and an estoppel in pais exists only when third persons have acted on the faith of admissions or acts of the true owner and changed their condition to their detriment, or to the advantage of him who speaks or acts, in consequence thereof. *Jones v. Morgan,*13 Ga. 515 (2); *Reeves v. Matthews,*17 Ga. 449. “One invoking th'e conduct of another as constituting an estoppel in pais must show that *712he has acted. thereon to his detriment, or has been hurt thereby.” *Hancock v. King,*133 Ga. 734 (2) (66 SE 949). Where the only evidence of estoppel is that the claimant attended the trial of the main case in which claimant’s wife (defendant in fi. fa.) sued the plaintiff in fi. fa. seeking to recover for damages to an automobile (the property levied on) driven by her arising out of a collision with an automobile driven by plaintiff in fi. fa. who recovered in the cross action filed by him against the wife, and that the claimant heard the wife and another witness testify that the automobile levied upon belonged to the wife and made no objection thereto, such evidence is not sufficient to show that the plaintiff in fi. fa. did any act to his damage in reliance upon the silence of the claimant at the time of trial.

Decided May 12, 1964.

*Franklin B. Anderson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Beeves & Collier, Bex T. Beeves,*contra.

4. There being no evidence to the contrary, the unimpeached written evidence of title in the claimant to the property levied upon antedating the collision and that he had not sold or given the property to anyone, a verdict against the claimant was unauthorized and the judge erred in overruling claimant’s motion for a new trial on the general grounds and the Appellate Division of the Civil Court of Fulton County erred in affirming the trial court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,716
<SECURITIES>                                   745,739
<RECEIVABLES>                                  376,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (24,159)
<INVENTORY>                                    427,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,554,677
<PP&E>                                         766,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                (727,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,345,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,426,004
<BONDS>                                        580,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     890,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,345,416
<SALES>                                      1,113,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,113,665
<CGS>                                          910,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  910,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,582,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,527,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,379,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (102,884)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,052
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,527,107)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.95)
        


</TABLE>
ODP Information Bulletin
                 No. 00-024   December 8, 2000


          TO:       All State Administrative Agency Heads
          All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

          FROM:     C.H. "Butch" Straub, II
          Director

          SUBJECT:  Reporting Requirements for Fiscal Year 1999 State Domestic Preparedness
          Equipment Program Grants


This information bulletin is being provided to clarify the reporting requirements associated with 
Office for Domestic Preparedness Support (ODP) Fiscal Year 1999 State
Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program grants.  The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office
of the Comptroller (OC) has established standardized reporting requirements for all OJP grantees. 
Based on guidance provided in the OC Financial Guide, ODP state grantees will need to
submit the following reports as indicated:

                    Financial Status Reports (SF-269s)   Financial status reports should be
          completed and provided to the Office of the Comptroller's Control Desk within 45
          days after the end of each calendar quarter during the grant period.

                    Categorical Assistance Progress Reports (OJP Form 4587/1)   Categorical
          Assistance Progress Reports should be completed and provided to the Office of
          the Comptroller's Control Desk within 30 days after the end of the reporting
          periods, which are 06/30 and 12/31 for the life of the award. 

Remember that both reports must be provided for partial calendar quarters covered by your grant,
as well as for periods where no grant activity occurred.  Also, this guidance supercedes language
contained in the ODP Fiscal Year 1999 State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program
Program Guidelines and Application Kit.  Language in the application kit indicates that grantees
are required to submit an "annual progress report" no later than December 31 for activities
undertaken in the previous fiscal year.  This report will not be required.Please note that, based on the guidance provided by OC, ODP state grantees will need to
provide a Categorical Assistance Progress Report for the period covering March 24, 2000
through June 30, 2000.  This report should be provided to OC as soon as possible.  Two hard
copies of these reports should be mailed to OC at: 

                    Office of the Comptroller
                    Attn: Control Desk
                    810 Seventh Street, N.W.
                    Washington, D.C. 20531

For your convenience, blank copies of both reports, along with instructions for completing them, 
have been attached.  Additionally, these forms can be found on the OJP web site located at:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/forms.htm.  

Please feel free to contact your ODP program manager if you have any additional questions
about these required reports.


Attachments
#### JOHN GEORGE DAY AND ISAIAH NEWTON DAY, partners, under the firm name of J. G. *&*I. N. DAY, *v.*THE UNITED STATES.

[48 C. Cls., 128; 245 U. S., 159.]

The contract for the completion of work on the canal and locks of the Columbia River contains most stringent provisions making contractors “ *responsible, without expense to the Government, for the preservation and, good condition of all the work now in place,” etc.*Before their work is done a freshet in the river, unprecedented in height, makes it necessary to protect the work by constructing a new and higher bulkhead a distance of 2,000 yards at the cost of $37,485.

The court below decides:

Where a contract binds the contractors, absolutely, to protect the work “ *without expense to the Government ”*they must do so, though the necessity be caused by an unprecedented rise in the Columbia River at the Cascades above the 142-foot mark, and the extent and cost of the protective work could not have been reasonably anticipated.

The necessity of certain protective work may have been caused by the act of God, the unprecedented rise of a river, but if it did not render performance impossible it did not relieve the contractors from their obligation to perform.

The language of a contract can not be deemed ambiguous where its intent harmonizes with other provisions of the contract and disagrees with none.

The fact that certain unforseen protective work was done “ *by authority of the engineer in charge,”*and the additional facts that in his annual report of the following year he recommended that the project be changed so as to bring such protective bulkhead 6 feet higher, which recommendation was approved by the Chief of Engineers and the bulkhead was *620brought up to that height, do not constitute a construction of the contract by the officer in charge which would relieve the contractors from the obligation requiring *“ the entire completion of the loch,”*and cast upon them “ *every expense of whatever nature that may arise -during the progress of the work.”*

The decision of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court November 26, 1917.
#### § 583.704 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to OFAC, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a Federal district court.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1060. MONICA BROWN v. GREYSTAR MANAGEMENT.

This action began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court, which

transferred the case to the superior court. On September 22, 2017, the superior court

issued a final order granting the plaintiff’s motion to issue a writ of possession and

denying defendant Monica Brown’s motion to file exhibits under seal. Brown filed

a notice of appeal on October 20, 2017. We lack jurisdiction.

Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order

sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The underlying subject matter of an

appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate

procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The

underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56,

appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within seven days of the date the

judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523

(521 SE2d 456) (1999). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Id. at 523. Brown’s notice

of appeal is untimely, as it was filed 28 days after entry of the order she seeks to

appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 21, 2018

06/21/2018
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Linda Pace, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of TCG BDC II, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





• the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


• the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 28, 2022/s/ Linda PaceLinda PaceChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


* The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

FRANK WATERS , Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1068

[ May 11, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Richard L. Oftedal, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2019

- CA

- 015770

- XXXX

- MB

.
Garrett Kesl of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Adam A. Diaz of Diaz An selmo & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , J J., ,concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 550.307 Government of Ethiopia.

The term *Government of Ethiopia* means the Government of Ethiopia, any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including the National Bank of Ethiopia, and any person owned, controlled, or directed by, or acting for or on behalf of, the Government of Ethiopia.
# Central African Republic

		Subscribe		

61 items

        -    		Central African Republic	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  March 3, 2017 
        -    		Central African Republic Sanctions	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Program Management  		Sub-Saharan Africa – Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Small Grants (Summary)	  August 7, 2016 

previous page1…4567next page

Back to Top
FINAL- 2009 - BIENNUAL TANK 

INTEGRITY TESTING REPORT 

(CDRL A001) – BFCUST #12 

at 

FISC RED HILL / 

PEARL HARBOR, HI 

Prepared for: 

Defense Energy Support Center 

Ft. Belvoir, Virginia

Prepared under: 

NAVFAC Contract N62470-07-D-0502 

Submitted by: 

Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 

Virginia Beach, VA

Date: 

8 JUNE 2009
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

39 40 41 42



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review; Group Neuroscience Review Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         November 16-17, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites Hotel—Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW., Washington, DC 20015.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 2081, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800,                         *bbuzas@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271 Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: August 24, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20865 Filed 8-31-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-144-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# Brazil

224 items

        -    Report  		Brazil	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		U.S.-Brazil Joint Action Plan To Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Discrimination	   
        -    		Social Inclusion and Access to Opportunity for All	   
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Brazil (18-1001) – Agreement on Social Security with Administrative Arrangement	  October 1, 2018 
        -    		Overseas Business Insights, August-September, 2018	  August 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Brazil	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Brazil	  June 28, 2018 
        -    		Overseas Business Insights, June, 2018	  June 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Brazil	  May 29, 2018 

previous page1…1617181920…23next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Executive
Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates
and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes    
|Larry G. Gerdes        
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 11, 2006
#### § 578.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures, and other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
No. 00-5818.

#### James *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.