alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tyrone GLADON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-576.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 2, 1981.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles D. Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Max Rudmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court sentenced the appellant pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement and retained jurisdiction over the first twenty years of appellant’s sentence, pursuant to the terms of Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979). On appeal appellant challenges the constitutionality of Section 947.16(3), and also asserts that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because the trial court did not advise him in advance of its intention to retain jurisdiction.

The supreme court has now upheld the constitutionality of Section 947.16(3). See *Borden*v. *State,*402 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1981). This disposes of appellant’s contention to the contrary.

The second basis of appeal, however, requires reversal. Appellant’s eligibility for parole was undoubtedly a major factor in his decision to enter a plea of guilty. It is conceded that' appellant was not informed that the trial court could or would retain veto authority over appellant’s parole for twenty years. Fundamental fairness requires that the appellant be allowed to withdraw his plea and the case proceed to trial. There should be no substantial surprises in plea agreements. The retention of jurisdiction was an integral part of the sentence and, in its effect, made the sentence actually imposed upon appellant more severe than the sentence contemplated by the plea agreement and hence the appellant should be entitled to an opportunity to withdraw his plea. *Green v. State,*406 So.2d 1148 (Fla.1981). See also *State v. Wilson,*395 So.2d 520 (Fla.1981); and *Richmond v. State,*375 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The trial court may either modify the sentence, eliminating retention of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, afford appellant the opportunity to change his plea.

We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

*1220ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

MOORE, J., dissents without opinion.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, James
W. Nall, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of H udson
United Bancorp ,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxely Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:
 
 (1) The
Annual Report on From 10-K of Hudson United Bncorp for the annual period ended
Decemberr 31, 2004 (the “ Report”)
fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securitities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and;
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hudson United Bancorp.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished soley pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
      JAMES W. NALLJames
      W. Nall
      Executive
      Vice Pesident andChief Financial OfficerMarch
      15, 2005
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has
been provided to Hudson United Bancorp and will be retained by Hudson United
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw , 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.]

B ROWN , A PPELLANT , v. B RADSHAW , W ARDEN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw , 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.] Habeas corpus — Claim of denial of right to be present and to have counsel present at critical stage of trial — Ad equate remedy in ordinary course of law by way of direct appeal — Writ denied. (No. 2010-0649

— Submitted August 10, 2010

— Decided August 18, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 10 CA 14.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Felix Brown Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus. “Like other extraordinary-writ actions, habeas corpus is not available when there is an adequate remedy in the or dinary course of law.” In re Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Goeller , 103 Ohio St.3d 427, 2004-Ohio-5579, 816 N.E.2d 594, ¶ 6. Brown had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his
criminal convictions and sentence to raise hi s claims that he was denied his right to be physically present and to have counsel present at a critical stage in his trial, as well as to have the portion of the trial in which the trial court issued supplemental jury instructions open to the public. See Bozsik v. Hudson , 110 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 1200, ¶ 7-9; State v. Davis , 116 Ohio St.3d 404, 2008-Ohio-2, 880 N.E.2d 31, ¶ 90-93. Judgment affirmed.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Felix Brown Jr., pro se.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

__________________
# Belgium

255 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Belgium	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Barclay’s Travel to Belgium	  April 23, 2023 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Efi Koutsokosta of Euronews	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with New Zealand Foreign Minister Mahuta	  April 5, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And New Zealand Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2023NATO Headquarters Brussels, Belgium 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg	  April 4, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Finland’s NATO Instruments of Accession Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu at the Deposit of Türkiye’s Instruments of Ratification of Finland’s NATO Accession	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 4, 2023NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 

previous page1…678910…26next page

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2014

h0721 

# Order

Clerk July 29, 2014

148609 & (31)(32)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148609

COA: 317159

Wayne CC: 04

- 012409

- FC

KEVIN ALLEN

- JERMAINE BROWN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motions to waive fees and to expand the record are DENIED.
#### § 546.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.

[89 FR 15750, Mar. 5, 2024]
Exhibit 99.1


 


THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


Daulton
Capital Corp


 

 


 


 


The
following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice
to this meeting having been waived, held on August 28th, 2012;


 


The
Board of Directors which was present for this meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Arun
Pudur


Arun
Ramachandran


Brian
Smith 


 


WHEREAS
there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to formally RESIGN my position as DIRECTOR of the company,



 


 


NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the corporation having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference
in the issue, has decided unanimously and RESOLVED that: I do hereby formally RESIGN as Director of the company, and do hereby,
by affixing, my signature hereto, officially as my last corporate act of Director, DO HEREBY RESIGN.


 


The
Director of the corporation, by affixing his signature hereto, does hereby formally resign, and shall allow the new Board to choose
its Directors at a time and place of its choosing.


 


 


/s/
Arun Pudur





Arun
Pudur, Director


 


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


Daulton
Capital Corp


 

 





 


The
following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice
to this meeting having been waived, held on August 28th, 2012;


 


The
Board of Directors which was present for this meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Arun
Ramachandran


Arun Pudur


Brian Smith


 


WHEREAS
there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to formally RESIGN my position as DIRECTOR of the company,


 



 


NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the corporation having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference
in the issue, has decided unanimously and RESOLVED that: I do hereby formally RESIGN as Director of the company, and do hereby,
by affixing, my signature hereto, officially as my last corporate act of Director, DO HEREBY RESIGN.


 


The
Director of the corporation, by affixing his signature hereto, does hereby formally resign, and shall allow the new Board to choose
its Directors at a time and place of its choosing.


 


 


 


/s/ Arun Ramachandran





Arun
Ramachandran, Director
HomeArmenia

# Armenia

242 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 5, 2024European Commission HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Media Note  		Joint U.S.-EU-Armenia High Level Meeting in Support of Armenia’s Resilience	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 1, 2024	  Matthew MillerApril 1, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 28, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 28, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 27, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 26, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 26, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 11, 2024	  Matthew MillerMarch 11, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Sri Lanka Transitional Justice	  March 1, 2024 
        -    Special Needs Profile  		Yerevan, Armenia: QSI International School of Yerevan: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 26, 2024 

previous page1234…25next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          37,754
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,341
<PP&E>                                          21,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,554
<SALES>                                         19,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,379
<CGS>                                            8,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 584.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
#### § 802.1106 Waiver.

If the Staff Chairperson determines that extraordinary circumstances relating to national security warrant, the Staff Chairperson may waive the filing fee in whole or in part and will notify the parties in writing. No waiver shall be implied, even where the Staff Chairperson does not reject a voluntary notice under § 802.1108 for failure to pay the required filing fee.
40252.

#### MILLWOOD v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

1. Where an indictment for burglary charges that the breaking and entering of a storehouse was done with the intent of committing a larceny, and the larceny of goods of the value of more than $50 is particularly set out, two felonious offenses are charged, to wit, burglary and larceny *280from the house, and there may be a conviction of the accused of .larceny from the house. *Code*§§ 26-2401, 26-2630; *Williams v. State,*60 Ga. 88 (2); *Polite v. State,*78 Ga. 347 (1); *Ray v. State,*121 Ga. 189 (48 SE 903); *Cannon v. State,*125 Ga. 785, 787 (54 SE 692); *Thomas v. State,*18 Ga. App. 101 (3) (88 SE 917); *Butts v. State,*26 Ga. App. 40 (1) (105 SE 372). The conviction of the defendant of larceny from the house was authorized by the evidence.

Decided September 4, 1963.

*Stow &. Andrews, Robert E. Andrews,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jess H. Watson, Solicitor General,*contra.

2. The part of the charge of the court attacked by the defendant in the special ground of his motion for a new trial was not abstractly incorrect, and the judge did not in so charging direct the jury to find the defendant guilty of any offense. Therefore, this ground of the motion is without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
§ 542.313 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's Web site: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's Web site: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 542.313 :
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 48317, 48318, June 6, 2024]
#### § 800.253 U.S. national.

The term *U.S. national* means an individual who is a U.S. citizen or an individual who, although not a U.S. citizen, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.
#### Lewis Marion WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-41.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 23, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1979.

Mark King Leban, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL, (Ret.) Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant and another were arrested by undercover police upon effecting a sale to the latter of two kilos of cocaine. When arrested appellant was in possession of two concealed weapons, a .38 caliber revolver and a .25 caliber automatic pistol. Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction of conspiracy to sell, and for sale and possession of cocaine and for carrying two concealed weapons. We hold error has not been shown, and affirm.

Appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence to show his participation in the sale of the drugs is without merit. The sale was arranged for with a woman named Nuria. To make the sale she appeared with the appellant at a motel room maintained by the officers. The appellant opened a briefcase in which were two cans (which contained the cocaine). There was evidence he and they discussed incidents of the sale — price, quantity, etc., and that the purchase was made and purchase money handed over to Nuria by the (police) purchasers. Thereupon the arrest was made. Appellant testified he had no knowledge of the sale, and was without knowledge as to the contents of the cans in the briefcase. He testified he was there to get some papers signed and a fee incident to a divorce matter he was handling. On that conflicting evidence the jury properly could and did hold the defendant guilty. The evidence as to the subject of the sale was adequate to support a finding that it was cocaine.

We find no merit in the appellant’s contention that his conviction for carrying the concealed weapons should be reversed on *421the ground that the revolver and pistol were not firearms. See *State v. Nunez,*368 So.2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.
Skip to main content 

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

## Utility (Top) navigation

-  About Us   **Forward **Back-  About Us
-  Mission & Vision
-  Leadership
-  Our Organization
-  Our Facilities
-  Regions

-  Laws & Regulations   **Forward **Back-  Laws & Regulations
-  Laws, Agreements & Treaties
-  Hunting Regulations

-  Library   **Forward **Back-  Library
-  Categories
-  Collections

                          -   Home 
                          -   Services   **Forward **Back-   Services 
-   Duck Stamps   **Forward **Back-   Duck Stamps 
-   Buy a Duck Stamp or E-Stamp 
-   Buy a Junior Duck Stamp 

-   Fish Stocking 
-   Importing & Exporting 
-   Consultation & Technical Assistance   **Forward **Back-   Consultation & Technical Assistance 
-   ESA Section 7 Consultation 
-   Habitat Conservation Planning (HCPs) 
-   Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCA & CCAA) 
-   Safe Harbour Agreements (SHA) 
-   Conservation Banking 
-   Coastal Barrier Resources Act Project Consultation 
-   Coastal Barrier Resources System Property Documentation 

-   Financial Assistance 
-   Species Management 
-   Investigational New Animal Drugs (INADS) 
-   Permits 
-   Search All Services 
Duck StampsOne of the easiest ways that anyone can support bird habitat conservation is by buying duck stamps.
                          -   Species   **Forward **Back-   Species 
-   Explore Taxonomic Tree 
-   Find a Species 
Interest storyBats: “The Coolest Mammals on Earth”
                          -   Visit Us   **Forward **Back-   Visit Us 
-   Events 
-   National Fish Hatcheries 
-   National Wildlife Refuges 
-   Outdoor Recreation 
-   Recreation Passes 
-   Our Locations 
Scenic DrivesTour routes of great scenic drives on National Wildlife Refuges.
                          -   Get Involved   **Forward **Back-   Get Involved 
-   Careers and Internships 
-   Volunteering 
-   Friends Partnerships 
-   Learning Opportunities 
-   Education Programs 
-   Events 
-   Partnerships   **Forward **Back-   Partnerships 
-   Partnership Categories 
-   Partner List 

VolunteerSearch for volunteer opportunities around the country
                          -   Newsroom   **Forward **Back-   Newsroom 
-   Press Releases 
-   Congressional Testimony 
-   Media Contacts 
Wild ThingsNews about wonderful wild things and places
                          -   Initiatives   **Forward **Back-   Initiatives 
-   Combating Wildlife Trafficking 
-   Director's Priorities 
-   Climate Change 
-   Fishing 
-   Invasive Species 
-   Pollinators 
-   Protecting Wildlife 
Climate ActionFWS is taking steps to mitigate climate impacts
                          -   I want to   **Forward **Back-  I Want To
-   Report Wildlife Crime 
-   Do Business with FWS 
-   Volunteer 
-   Find a Job or Internship 
-   Visit a Refuge 
-   Buy a Duck Stamp 
-   Apply for a Permit 
-   Find Funding 
-   Find Training 
Wild workSearch employment opportunities with USFWS

## Search

Search

# Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge
#### § 590.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 590.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201.
#### § 526.306 Hostage-taking.

The term *hostage-taking* has the same meaning as provided in Presidential Policy Directive 30 of June 24, 2015 (“U.S. Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts”), which is the unlawful abduction or holding of a person or persons against their will in order to compel a third person or governmental organization to do or to abstain from doing any act as a condition for the release of the person detained.