alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2130

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Julio Oviedo, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 31, 2001

 Filed: November 6, 2001

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Julio Oviedo pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent

to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

The district court1

 sentenced him to 292 months imprisonment and five years

supervised release. On appeal, Oviedo’s attorney has filed a brief and moved to

withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Oviedo has filed a pro

se supplemental brief. We affirm Oviedo’s conviction and sentence.
-2-

Counsel argues that Oviedo did not admit to each element of a conspiracy, but

the plea transcript amply supports a factual basis for the plea. See United States v.

Rodgers, 18 F.3d 1425, 1428-29 (8th Cir. 1994). In his pro se submission, Oviedo

argues that the district court improperly awarded him criminal history points for being

on probation when he committed the instant offense, imposing a two-level

enhancement for possessing a gun, and holding him responsible for fifteen or more

kilograms of methamphetamine.

We reject these arguments: (1) because Oviedo’s criminal history category

would be the same without the two challenged criminal history points, any error

would be harmless, see United States v. Tiger, 223 F.3d 811, 812-13 (8th Cir. 2000),

and in any event his challenge is completely unfounded; (2) the district court did not,

in fact, assess any gun-possession enhancement; and (3) not only did Oviedo stipulate

to the drug quantity he now challenges, see United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781,

783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence

may not challenge that punishment on appeal), but the assessed drug quantity is well

supported in the presentence report, which Oviedo did not challenge, see United

States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (district court may

accept as true all factual allegations contained in PSR that are not specifically

objected to by parties).

Finally, any claim by Oviedo asserting ineffective assistance of counsel should

be raised in a postconviction proceeding. See United States v. Cain, 134 F.3d 1345,

1352 (8th Cir. 1998). Having found no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal upon our

independent review pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we affirm the

judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 544.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *Information or informational materials.* ( 1 ) The importation from any country and the exportation to any country of any information or informational materials, as defined in § 544.304, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission, are exempt from the prohibitions of this part.
( 2 ) This section does not exempt from regulation or authorize transactions related to information or informational materials not fully created and in existence at the date of the transactions, or to the substantive or artistic alteration or enhancement of informational materials, or to the provision of marketing and business consulting services. Such prohibited transactions include, but are not limited to, payment of advances for information or informational materials not yet created and completed (with the exception of prepaid subscriptions for widely circulated magazines and other periodical publications); provision of services to market, produce or co-produce, create, or assist in the creation of information or informational materials; and, with respect to information or informational materials imported from persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a), payment of royalties with respect to income received for enhancements or alterations made by U.S. persons to such information or informational materials.
( 3 ) This section does not exempt or authorize transactions incident to the exportation of software subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730-774, or to the exportation of goods, technology, or software for use in the transmission of any data, or to the provision, sale, or leasing of capacity on telecommunications transmission facilities (such as satellite or terrestrial network connectivity) for use in the transmission of any data. The exportation of such items or services and the provision, sale, or leasing of such capacity or facilities to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a) are prohibited.
( c ) *Travel.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions ordinarily incident to travel to or from any country, including importation of accompanied baggage for personal use, maintenance within any country including payment of living expenses and acquisition of goods or services for personal use, and arrangement or facilitation of such travel including nonscheduled air, sea, or land voyages.
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK — GENERAL TERM

MAY, 1898.

#### Bridget M. Kelly, Respondent, *v*. Alice M. Theiss, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon á verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Fromme Brothers, for appellant.

Arthur J. Westermayr, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

The plaintiff testified that she loaned the defendant George Theiss the sum of $200' in cash upon condition that he would have the defendant Alice Theiss indorse the note in suit. That Alice Theiss did so indorse the note, and thereafter it was delivered to the plaintiff.

For the defendant it was claimed that the indorsement was. procured for the purpose of enabling the plaintiff -to have the note discounted, and upon an agreement that the plaintiff would not hold the defendant or enforce any liability, by reason of .such indorsement.

The conflict in the evidence was submitted to the jury fairly and impartially by .the learned trial1 justice, and the jury found for the plaintiff, and that verdict is sustained by a fair preponderance of evidence.

. No claim was made that the defendant Alipe Theiss had received any consideration for her indorsement. That indorsement having been procured for the purpose of enabling George Theiss to obtain a credit with the plaintiff, it follows that the objection to the- question *“*whether this defendant received any consideration for the indorsement was properly sustained.”

We think that the case was properly disposed of below, and that the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with COStS. . : i . . ... • /y- |

Sohuchmah, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
HomeEstonia

# Estonia

101 items

        -    TIAS  		Estonia (97-216) – Treaty for the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection Of Investment	  February 16, 1997 

previous page1…91011

Back to Top
Appliance Standards Regulatory Advisory Committee

DOE Forrestal
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585

8E

- 089
June 6, 2014 1 pm

– 5 pm

Preliminary Agenda

Time Discussion

1:00

– 1:15 Welcome and Introduction of New Members (John Cymbalsky)

1:15

– 1: 45 Ground Rules Discussion

– Any Changes? ( Andrew deLaski, John
Mandyck, Ashley Armstrong )

1:45

– 2:00 Pumps Working Group Status Update (Tom Eckman)

2:00

– 2:15 Manufactured Housing Negotiated Rulemaking Discussion and
Working Group Formation Vote (Andrew deLaski)

2:15

– 2:30 Regional Standards Enforcement Negotiated Rulemaking Discussion
and Working Group Formation Vote (John Mandyck)

2:30

– 2:45 AHRI Letter

– Issues for Consideration on Automatic Commercial

Ice Makers (John Mandyck)

2:45

– 4:00 Open Discussion from Public

4:00

– 4:15 Call for Nominations/ Next Meeting Date/Wrap Up (John
Cymbalsky)
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00317-CV 

 

MORDECAI NYACHIEO KOAKA, APPELLANT 

V. 

HARMONY APARTMENTS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Tarrant County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2022-004405-1, Honorable Don Pierson, Presiding 

March 8, 2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Mordecai Nyachieo Koaka, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial 

court’s judgment.1 Koaka’s brief was due January 30, 2023, but was not filed. By letter 

of February 6, 2023, we notified Koaka that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want 

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by 

the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 
2

of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by February 16. To date, 

Koaka has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Per Curiam
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0153

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM022AD

CSB 233W3202-24-04, R1 --- 9/25/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 25-8**Date:**05/02/1986** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Auxiliary Fuel Systems Installations** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  21**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**ANM-112** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew’s Travel to Panama and Colombia

# 									Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew’s Travel to Panama and Colombia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 20, 2023

Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew will travel to Panama and Colombia from October 23-27, 2023. In Panama, Coordinator Nephew will meet with justice sector and law enforcement officials, legislators, and participate in a civil society roundtable. In Colombia, he will co-lead a bilateral Anti-Corruption Working Group to discuss the current efforts and challenges to combatting corruption and identify areas for further cooperation. He will meet separately with representatives of anti-corruption institutions, law enforcement, local officials, and civil society.

Follow @StateCGAC on Twitter to learn more.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsColombiaCorruptionOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-CorruptionOffice of the SpokespersonPanama

Back to Top
#### § 589.313 Equity.

The term *equity* as used in § 589.202 includes stocks, share issuances, depositary receipts, or any other evidence of title or ownership.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2821

To provide for the transfer of six obsolete tugboats of the Navy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20, 1995

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To provide for the transfer of six obsolete tugboats of the

Navy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE TUGBOATS

4 OF THE NAVY.

5 (a) REQUIREMENT TO TRANSFER VESSELS.—The

6 Secretary of the Navy shall transfer the six obsolete tug7 boats of the Navy specified in subsection (b) to the North8 east Wisconsin Railroad Transportation Commission, an

9 instrumentality of the State of Wisconsin. Such transfers

10 shall be made without reimbursement and shall be effec11 tive December 31, 1995.
2

•HR 2821 IH

1 (b) VESSELS COVERED.—The requirement in sub2 section (a) applies to the six decommissioned Cherokee

3 class tugboats, listed as of the date of the enactment of

4 this Act as being surplus to the Navy, that are designated

5 as ATF–105, ATF–110, ATF–149, ATF–158, ATF–159,

6 and ATF–160.

7 (c) CONDITION RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL COM8 PLIANCE.—The Secretary shall require as a condition of

9 the transfer of a vessel under subsection (a) that use of

10 the vessel by the Commission not commence until the

11 terms of any necessary environmental compliance letter or

12 agreement with respect to that vessel have been complied

13 with.

14 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

15 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi16 tions in connection with the transfers required by sub17 section (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Æ
#### Michael HILLYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 23, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20374 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE COLLAZO, also known as Carlos E. Soto, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-377-3

-------------------- April 10, 2002 Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jorge Collazo asserts that the district court erred in upwardly adjusting his sentence for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Collazo contends that his misrepresentations regarding his identity were not willful, but resulted from confusion, mistake, or faulty memory. The presentence report (“PSR”) found that Collazo obstructed justice by willfully providing materially false information regarding his true identity to the magistrate judge during the detention hearing. Since Collazo did not present at theNo. 01-20374 -2- sentencing hearing any rebuttal evidence in support of his objection, the district court was free to adopt the PSR’s finding without further inquiry. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the district court did not err, clearly or otherwise, in finding that Collazo obstructed justice. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment. (nn.2, 4(f)) ; United
States v. Storm , 36 F.3d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994)

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
HomeAruba

# Aruba

23 items

        -    TIAS  		Netherlands (16-1102.1) – Agreements Extending Agreement of March 2, 2000 Concerning Access to and Use of Facilities in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba for Aerial Counter-Narcotics Activities	  November 2, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Netherlands (13176) – Agreement Extending to the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba the Application of the Agreement on Mutual Administrative Assistance for the Proper Application of Customs Law	  December 13, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Netherlands in respect of Aruba (96-304) – Transportation Aviation Preclearance Agreement	  March 4, 1996 

previous page123

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000702402  
<NAME>                             DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1981-1 LTD PARTNERSHIP
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                118,975
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          27,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      146,812
<PP&E>                             41,120,448
<DEPRECIATION>                     41,049,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        221,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  50,413
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             85,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          221,590
<SALES>                               166,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      171,476
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         181,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (9,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (9,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (9,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
HomeAlgeria

# Algeria

100 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Algeria and Morocco	  January 20, 2023 
        -    		Countries of Particular Concern, Special Watch List Countries, Entities of Particular Concern	  November 30, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 7, 2022	  Vedant PatelOctober 7, 2022Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Algeria	  September 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Algeria	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Algeria	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Algeria National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 5, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Algeria	  June 6, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Algeria	  June 2, 2022 
        -    		Specific Instance between IndustriALL Global Union and General Electric Company Regarding Operations in Algeria	  May 25, 2022 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
# Greece

169 items

        -    		Travel to Germany, Türkiye, and Greece, February 16-22, 2023	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Karen Donfried On Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Germany, Türkiye, and Greece	  February 15, 2023Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Germany, Türkiye, and Greece	  Ned PriceFebruary 15, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 13, 2023	  Vedant PatelJanuary 13, 2023Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 20, 2022	  Ned PriceDecember 20, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 12, 2022	  Ned PriceDecember 12, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the 24th Annual Capital Link Invest in Greece Forum	  Geoffrey R. PyattDecember 9, 2022New York City, New York 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for the World LNG Summit	  Geoffrey R. PyattNovember 30, 2022Greece 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – November 18, 2022	  Vedant PatelNovember 18, 2022Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces the First Cohort of Countries to Endorse the Ocean Conservation Pledge at COP27	  November 16, 2022 

previous page1…56789…17next page

Back to Top
§ 542.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 542.507(a) to or on behalf of the Government of Syria or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 542.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (a) authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Records.* Consistent with § 501.601 of this chapter, U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must retain for five years from the date of the relevant payment a record that specifies the following for each payment: ( 1 ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( 2 ) If applicable: ( i ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( ii ) A general description of the services provided; and
( iii ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 3 ) These records must be furnished to OFAC on demand consistent with § 501.602 of this chapter.
[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 48320, June 6, 2024]
HomeChina

# China

925 items

        -    TIAS  		China (13-1120) – Protocol for Cooperation in the Science and Technology of Medicine and Public Health	  November 20, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		China (13-711) – Protocol on Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  July 11, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		China (12-1020) – Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation in the Use of United States Land Remote Sensing Satellite Data	  October 20, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		China (12-625) – Memorandum of Understanding on Scientific and Technological Cooperation in the Field of Environmental Protection	  June 25, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		China (12-504) – Implementing Accord for Cultural Exchange for the Period of 2012 through 2014 Under the Cultural Agreement of January 31, 1979	  May 4, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		China (12-425) – Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Films for Theatrical Release	  April 25, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		China (11-1121.1) – Trade Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation	  November 21, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		China (11-118) – Protocol for Cooperation in Energy Sciences	  January 18, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		China (10-1102.2) – Protocol Concerning Earth Observation System and Related Data Activities	  November 2, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		China (10-1010) – Memorandum of Understanding on Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Field of Environment	  October 10, 2010 

previous page1…888990919293next page

Back to Top