alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALFIN INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE 3 MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,875,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  698,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,232,165
<INVENTORY>                                  3,767,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,973,938
<PP&E>                                       5,173,880
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,674,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,319,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,439,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,779,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,319,076
<SALES>                                      9,634,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,634,712
<CGS>                                        3,095,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,620,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                855,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                   265,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            590,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   590,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### § 549.509 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78475, Dec. 21, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 977-978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6478]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Turner to Cezanne: Masterpieces from the Davies 
Collection, National Museum Wales''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Turner to Cezanne: Masterpieces from the 
Davies Collection, National Museum Wales,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary

[[Page 978]]

exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Columbia Museum of Art, Columbia, South 
Carolina, from on or about March 6, 2009, until on or about June 7, 
2009; Oklahoma City Museum of Art, Oklahoma City, OK, from on or about 
June 25, 2009, until on or about September 20, 2009; Everson Museum of 
Art, Syracuse, NY, from on or about October 8, 2009, until on or about 
January 3, 2010; Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or 
about January 30, 2010, until on or about April 25, 2010, and the 
Albuquerque Museum of Art & History, Albuquerque, NM, from on or about 
May 16, 2010, until on or about August 8, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 23, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E9-209 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 00-5828.

#### Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 62 ) ll-C-2 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19AM

Sheet 62 of 147P. 2 

### UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Yp n

### .

Office'o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an dStandard s !- • L J# \ Researc hTriangl ePark , N C 2771 1 T^oT^n 1



# * 8sos

# t_h22-° FACSIMIL E COVE R SHEE T
=»-=»=»= » Please Print inBlack Ink Only<=<=<=< = T O Nl^NJ i 

# ivVr* t-p-nej e 

## omc e fc^/^STK^

ArrO > V7oT>^K C CO , TELEPHON E # FA£PHON I PH E # 

### 22 c 

### \- 4-%&4~ PRO M 

# 3) . 'j&vt ^ "T> £I?j3£ rrl . TELEPHON E # OFFIC E "EElrt—} —.00- 2 Scoac e G£v'ie w

INFORMATIO N FO R SENDIN G FACSIMIL E MESSAGE S
DIVISIO N MUTUA LBUttTMN G

LOCATIO N FACSIMIL E TREPHON E NUMBER S FT S COMM6ROA L FT S VERIFICATIO N TREPHON E NUMBER S COMMERCIA L ESO AQM D ES D ES D O D TS D U-^AQM D AQM D l i m floor

limflcx x 10t h Roo r VthFkx x fitti Floo r 7thFk>o f 6t h Floo r St h Floo r 629-007 2 629-548 9 629-347 0 629-566 1 629-566 3 629-235 7 u3?Q33 7 629-080 4 (919)541-007 2

(919)541-548 9 (919)541-347 0 (9)9)541-566 1 (919)541-566 3

• * (919)541-235 7 (919 ) 541-^^° ° (919 ) 541-080 4 , 629-657 1

629-558 5 629-503 4 629-558 0 629-561 9 629-086 0 629-565 5 629-550 7 (919)541-557 1 (919)541-S58 S (919)541-503 4 (919)541-558 0 (919)541-561 9 (919)541-086 0 (919)541-565 5 (919)541-550 7 V W«x<Vv . /^•VW^oLi A\ s -Wi . W^ , j ^ . CJ«v

_»-<2.<\aj »sLi d •CU L^.u-v-^-Sa^.... ^ _-_*-y.v~e- VSJJ. CA&}iIT -5\ar/ \v-tvc-J—$ ~ V<7r,6-< > olw J V-C« . tW vIv-a ? ^<Cj C t » • WtU . K i P S



## 0 ^-—t^GU^ . CA^-'N^rv-^—

PAG P ] O f3 PAGI' S (INCLUDIN G COVC P S>-:!-H )P. 3 

# g

u>



# tn O ui 

# o
L UO 

# < o

—L L <



# a . U J 

# c o a. 

# o
< > 

## C O

_L U 

## (O S COLLI 

# J O O Z

- J 

# o a . oo

C O O ^ - I O 

# o o o ^-C0C\ |

m m



### C Mm

### ir ) CM 

# S 5

Q 

### < C C M 0 0 </> 

### C

M rj -

T ~ C O

C O M "



# m o 00 

# o

o

0 4

c : Z« ft

a ~ -* VJ ATTACHMEN T P. 4

AVERAG E TIM E POLLUTAN T PERIO D Sulfu r dioxid e Annua l

24-h r 3-hr Particulate s Annua l (TSP ) 24-h r CLAS S I I AREA S PS D MINIMU M CLAS S I I SIGNIFICANC E INCREMEN T LEVE L RATI O MSL/INCREMEN T
2 0 9 1 51 2 1 9 3 7 80 3bS l,3o o So l£> o 1

5 2 5 1 5 0.0 5

0.05 5 0.04 9 * * $

o.oia. 5 o.o\"2> 7 o-oi ^ 0.05 3 o.o a 0.13 5 0.O3 3 Nitroge n dioxid e Annua l 2 5 IOO 0.0 4 o . o l

POLLUTAN T AVERAG E

TIM E PERIO D CLAS S I AREA S

' PS D RATI O MINIMU M CLAS S I MSL/INCREMEN T SIGNIFICANC E INCREMEN T / LEVE L Sulfu r dioxid e Annua l

24-h r 3-hr 2

5 2 5 0.0 5 O'O.'b0. 1 o • O B

0.05 5 o.«5l * 0.27 5 o. I 0.04 9 o.<oi ^ 1.2 3 o. 5 Particulate s Annua l (TSP ) 24-h r 5 1 0 0.05 3 O,G_, o.2 7 0.\

0.13 5 O.c.^ 3 1.3 5 0. 3 Nitroge n dioxid e Annua l 2. 5 0.0 4 0.0 1 0. 1 O.0 3
#### INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, American Home Assurance Company, et al., Petitioners, v. Frederick E. M. BALLON et al., Respondents.

No. 79-1261.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 29, 1979.

Lake Lytal, Jr. of Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney & Searcy, West Palm Beach, Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, and Karon, Morrison & Savikas, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, International Ins. Co.

Richard A. Sherman of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, Tutan O’Hara & McCoy, Miami, for American Home Assurance Co.

Alex Hofrichter of Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard, P.A., Miami, for Federal Ins. Co.

Edna L. Caruso, West Palm Beach, and Magill, Sevier & Reid, Palm Beach, for Palm Beach Towers.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen.,'1 Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent, Paul T. Douglas.

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for certiorari, or alternatively for prohibition, petitioner seeks review of the trial court’s proposal to destroy certain notes taken by the jury. We are how advised that the notes are in the custody of the Circuit Court Clerk and have been placed under seal. Upon the representation that the notes will remain intact and be available for review in the event of a plenary appeal, we deny the petition.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
§ 555.205 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

# APR 172012

Mr. Michael Stanton President & CEO Association ofGlobal Automakers, Incorporated 1050 K Street, NW, Suite 650 Washington, D.C
. 2000 I Dear Mr. Stanton: Thank you for your letter ofFebruary 17,2012,to Administrator LisaJackson. Your letter urges the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to harmonize vehicle criteria emissions standards with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) LEV In program and to propose gasoline quality improvements such as reducing sulfur in gasoline. The EPA is developing the Tier 3 standards to respond to the critical need to improve air quality, and to enable a harmonized national vehicle emissions control program. This rule would reduce motor vehicle emissions and help state and local areas attain and maintain the existing health-based air quality standards in a cost-effective and timely way. Lower sulfur gasoline is necessary to operate the poHution control equipmentto achieve new Tier 3 vehicle standards, and will facilitate the development oflower cost technologiesto improve fuel economy. Improvements in fuel economy reduce gasoline consumption and save consumers money. The Tier 3 standards would create a comprehensive regulatory approach thatprovides certainty for both the auto and oil industries. Under a single harmonized national vehicle program, the Tier 3 standards would provide for coordinated implementationwith the Californiavehicle program and the EPA and Department ofTransportation's recently proposed light-duty vehicle standards to reduce carbon pollution and improve fuel economy for model years 2017 through 2025. The proposed standards are projected to save approximately 4 billion barrels ofoil and 2 billion metric tons ofcarbonpollution over the lifetime ofthe vehicles. Vehicles meeting these standards are projected to provide average net savings to consumers of$3,000 to $4,000 per vehicle
. We appreciate the information you shared regarding your members' support for a national emissions program and for lower gasoline sulfur standards. Your continued input onthe harmonization ofstate and federal vehicle emissions programs is valuable to the development ofa cost-effective Tier 3 program.

Internet**Addre~** (URL) • http/lv/WW epa gOY

. Recycled/Recyclable' Pl'1nted wllh Vegetable 0,1 Based Inks on 100% POslcofl5umer Process Chlorln Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for your letter. I appreciate the opportunity to be ofservice and trust the infonnation provided is helpful. Sincerely,

maMcCarthy Assistant Administrator
#### § 576.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                6064
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8601
<PP&E>                                              252989
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (252067)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       11719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               256035
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         114102
<COMMON>                                              8661
<OTHER-SE>                                    (367079)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         11719
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        38735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (24427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (24427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (24427)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.00)
<FN>
<F1>
Additional paid in capital and retained earnings.
</FN>




</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

October 24, 2006 

ERRATUM

Appeal No. 05-5034, -5035 

INDEPENDENCE PARK APARTMENTS v. UNITED STATES

Decided: September 15, 2006 Precedential Opinion 

Please make the following change: 

Remove the following text from page 7, line 3, and place it after a space following the word 

“have” on page 7, line 1: 

“voluntarily relinquishe[d]” a right that had already been taken by statute and had not
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2016

- 4224 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 170

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 6 $ 510.00 

### 0 $ 510.00 

### 76 $ 38,760.00

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 38,760



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### If found certain

damage, parts needs

to be replaced 4 $ 340.00 

### 8880.30 $ 9,220.30

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Condemning the Detention of Iranian Human Rights Defenders

# 											Condemning the Detention of Iranian Human Rights Defenders									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

October 31, 2023

The United States condemns the Iranian authorities’ violent assault and unjust detention of several human rights defenders during the October 29 funeral for 16-year-old Armita Geravand, who died after reportedly being assaulted on the Tehran metro for not wearing a hijab. 

Among those arrested at Armita Geravand’s funeral was renowned human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh, as well as several other peaceful activists.  The United States calls for the immediate and unconditional release from prison of Ms. Sotoudeh and others detained unjustly by the regime. 

We once again condemn the Iranian regime’s horrific treatment of its own people, including its campaign of violence against the women and girls of Iran.  The United States will continue to stand with the brave people of Iran and work with the international community to hold the regime accountable for its human rights abuses at home and abroad. 

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Near Eastern AffairsGlobal Women's IssuesHuman Rights and DemocracyIranOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 11128 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Cameron Jason Milton,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 415

- 2

**________________ ______________**  Before **Willett, Duncan,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Cameron Jason Milton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Milton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 1, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11128 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024No. 23

- 11128

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Our review r eveals a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment sets forth that Milton pleaded guilt y to Count 3 of the superseding indictment

. However, he pleaded guilty to Count 3 of the original indictment

. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. This matter is **REMANDED** for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See **Fed. R. Crim. P.**  36. Case: 23-11128 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/01/2024
www.gpo.gov

### §607. Divestment of inheritance of non-members

#### (a) Procedure

A person who is not an enrolled member of the Yakima Tribes with one-fourth degree or more blood of such tribes shall not be entitled to receive by devise or inheritance any interest in trust or restricted land within the Yakima Reservation or within the area ceded by the Treaty of June 9, 1855 (12 Stat. 1951), if, while the decedent's estate is pending before the Examiner of Inheritance, the Yakima Tribes pay to the Secretary of the Interior, on behalf of such person, the fair market value of such interest as determined by the Secretary of the Interior after appraisal. The interest for which payment is made shall be held by the Secretary in Trust for the Yakima Tribes.

#### (b) Time of election

On request of the Yakima Tribes the Examiner of Inheritance shall keep an estate pending for not less than two years from the date of decedent's death.

#### (c) Interest of surviving spouse

When a person who is prohibited by subsection (a) of this section from acquiring any interest by devise or inheritance is a surviving spouse of the decedent, a life estate in one-half of the interest acquired by the Yakima Tribes shall, on the request of such spouse, be reserved for that spouse and the value of such life estate so reserved shall be reflected in the Secretary's appraisal under subsection (a) of this section.

(Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 933, §7, 60 Stat. 969; Pub. L. 91–627, §1, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1874.)

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–627 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted provisions authorizing the Yakima Tribes to pay to Secretary of the Interior the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary after appraisal, of any interest in trust or restricted land within the specified areas which a person not an enrolled member of the Yakima Tribes with one-fourth degree or more blood of such tribes was to receive by devise or inheritance, for provisions limiting the inheritance of trust land on the Yakima Reservation to enrolled members of the Yakima Tribes of one-fourth or more blood of such tribes and to surviving spouses who are enrolled members but possess less than one-fourth degree of Yakima blood, with such surviving spouses authorized to inherit a life estate in not more than one-half the property, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Section 2 of Pub. L. 91–627 provided that: “The provisions of section 7 of the Act of August 9, 1946, as amended by this Act [this section], shall apply to all estates pending before the Examiner of Inheritance on the date of this Act [Dec. 31, 1970], and to all future estates, but shall not apply to any estate heretofore closed.”