alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Madagascar

53 items

        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Madagascar	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Madagascar	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  At the Anti-Corruption Champions Award Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 9, 2022Burns AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		2022 Anti-Corruption Champions Award 	  December 9, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Madagascar	  August 18, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Madagascar	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Madagascar National Day 	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 26, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Madagascar	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Madagascar	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Madagascar	  March 18, 2022 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
HomeIran

# Iran

595 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing with Senior State Department Officials on Diplomacy to Constrain Iran’s Nuclear Program	  February 18, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement by the Secretary of State of the United States of America and the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom	  February 18, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 17, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 17, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Mary Louise Kelly of NPR’s All Things Considered	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 16, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 12, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 11, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 11, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 10, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 10, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 9, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Wolf Blitzer of CNN’s The Situation Room	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 8, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 8, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 8, 2021 

previous page1…555657585960next page

Back to Top
II

Calendar No. 425

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2704

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

MAY 23, 1996

Reported by Mr. STEVENS, without amendment

AN ACT

To provide that the United States Post Office building that

is to be located at 7436 South Exchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Charles A. Hayes Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building that is to be

5 located at 7436 South Exchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Charles A. Hayes

7 Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 2704 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles A. Hayes Post

6 Office Building’’.

Calendar No. 425

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2704

AN ACT

To provide that the United States Post Office

Office Building’’.and designated as the ‘‘Charles A. Hayes Postchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, shall be knownbuilding that is to be located at 7436 South ExMAY 23, 1996

Reported without amendment
- Office Home
- About Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of The Biological Policy Staff

# Office of The Biological Policy Staff

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of The Biological Policy Staff (ISN/BPS) works to impede and roll back the threat of acquisition or use of biological weapons by state and non-state actors, oversees U.S. implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention, and manages a wide range of biological policy issues at the intersection of national security, public health, and science. Accordingly, BPS represents the Department of State in various governmental and non-governmental groups on a range of biological policy issues. The office is also the Department of State coordinator for the National Biodefense Strategy.				

Back to Top
§ 598.515 Authorizing Certain Transactions in Support of Nongovernmental Organizations' Activities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the activities described in paragraph (b) of this section by a nongovernmental organization are authorized, provided that the nongovernmental organization is not a specially designated narcotics trafficker.
( b ) The activities referenced in paragraph (a) of this section are non-commercial activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population that fall into one of the following categories: ( 1 ) Activities to support humanitarian projects to meet basic human needs, including disaster, drought, or flood relief; food, nutrition, or medicine distribution; the provision of health services; assistance for vulnerable or displaced populations, including individuals with disabilities and the elderly; and environmental programs;
( 2 ) Activities to support democracy building, including activities to support rule of law, citizen participation, government accountability and transparency, human rights and fundamental freedoms, access to information, and civil society development projects;
( 3 ) Activities to support education, including combating illiteracy, increasing access to education, international exchanges, and assisting education reform projects;
( 4 ) Activities to support non-commercial development projects directly benefiting civilians, including those related to health, food security, and water and sanitation;
( 5 ) Activities to support environmental and natural resource protection, including the preservation and protection of threatened or endangered species, responsible and transparent management of natural resources, and the remediation of pollution or other environmental damage; and
( 6 ) Activities to support disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and conflict resolution programs.
( c ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a specially designated narcotics trafficker, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
( d ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize nongovernmental or other entities to engage in other activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population, including support for the removal of landmines and economic development projects directly benefiting the civilian population.
Note 1 to § 598.515 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78506, Dec. 21, 2022]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1252 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 65 ) ll-B-2 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 2

Printed 5/21/200811:46:01 AM

Sheet 65of 184P. 2

MEMORANDU

M 

### &J.

DATE : February5 , 199 2 TO : HO

NProjec t Fil e FROM : Kristin e Scott , Radia n SUBJECT : Compositio n o f Design Molecul e 

# 6liI? N ;.!: ! DE C | 8199 2 EPAA;FTDGC??: ' Th e following calculatio n show s th e desig n VO C molecul e use d t o determin e th e amoun t o f ai r neede d i n an incinerato r use d t o combus t VOC . I t wa s assume d i n th e HONanalysi s tha t al l VO C molecule s ha d th e same structur e an d wer e represente d b yth e design molecule .

MCH/048 design.me m

. in—llaiUMtii nP. 3 

### E/A\©0/A\K ] ei © QOOQawooc a SIGNATURE . PBOIPC THO N CALCOLATBO M SHEE T DATE . CHECKED , JO B M O CALC . NO. , , DAT E SUBJECT . CrQhilofm N n fSV^r TM MciecJe, SHEE Ti . OF = J _ .SHEET S / Aprvjvtck_i_4 ^

EP ApipMLci - UU-hablisKiu L. a Ifndd^J ) .VO £
• y rW i B ' q hS- " o

_ j _ 

## " t : ' ..[__ . A . 0 i Ai-A-Aii-i_-T»u i loo j iJb.3-.o-f G8 a 3 l b iC i # «t"16lrnoL / 7 ! '"'"~ : I i ! _! "j - ' " , j 

### Al .3 u.or. . uh : r ....! £ o .kfLl_iha>4*

_I - i A L..i-t U l i i H i-M J | ibtooL 1^11 . aSfiJl b .

7 =|_±lLii

_Jlix I i >ryi o 

### -Zq..." S iM-j^^L_T°lii_r j ihi_j=i4iJaiiikrlo l J i

_; T4±kl^=j

_ifi_4 - af rjhii ^ Jjkvidji j !.byL_. 

### __D.fa S Uijm4L_LC [ I JXLQC o ; fbxnoL - 7t L o..C^3— ; l b fftoi * 

### .rbAi d ,_! _ 

# +
_c ^ • i 4- - J 4_



### a m 

# Rfe M rri^- r

i___ . -ftl^KburN. , T.W . CI' V ETovrroScfenca} . .Contro LDe yfee * ^ ^ (0*\ " E"VQluat/*oNl . Thecma l O xjda"h*oN . X N : Orqanifc . Chemica l N"3wUi£ax"hjfJin d 7 | f^p 3 Volume - 4_o ° CpmbyS+fqK L Con.traL...C^.»j"Ce.S..-...^ft*P.Q«--» - -J - U.. S . v _... . EnvTronmen-hiL . Protecffo N Age*ne y^ Researc h | "T" rTangle- . ParK^. . H C - , Publf'catro N No . EP A- 45~Q / ? - Q0-02 & . Decembe r1980 . pp. YHT- l. ta'YWO— 5 " „ I L J 1 r 1

..kk
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO** **** **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** ****


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** ****


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Protein Polymer
      Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      JAMES
      B. MCCCARTHY





James
      B.
      McCarthy


Interim
      Chief Executive Officer


November
      19, 2008
#### Evelyn SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-536.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1978.

Evelyn Scott, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HUBBART, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Robert M. TRAVIS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 01-3105.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2001.

Order Vacated, See 2001 WL 253382.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
#### Edgar H. Smith, Respondent, v. Charles Burliss, Appellant.

(County Court, Oswego County,

May, 1898.)

Justice’s Court — Jurisdiction — The plaintiff, although a town constable, cannot serve a summons in his own action.

The provisions of ¡sections 425 and 3157 of the Code of Civil Procedure forbid a party to an action to serve the summons in it and where the summons in an action in a Justice’s Court is served by the plaintiff,- although a town constable, the justice acquires no jurisdiction.

Abpeal from á judgment of a Justice’s Court, in favor of respondent. • ¡

O. M. Reilly, for appellant.

F. G. Spencer, for respondent.

Stowell, J.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the respondent and against the appellant, ¡in Justice’s. Court.

There is only one question in this case. It was conceded upon the argument that the plaintiff served the summons upon the defendant, the' plaintiff being at the time a duly elected constable of .the town of Schroeppel, and the justice’s return shows the same.

It is claimed by the appellant that the justice acquired no juris- ■ diction by such service.

The respondent contends that, under the authority of Tuttle v. Hunt, 2 Cow. 436, and Putnam v. Man, 3 Wend. 202; jurisdiction was acquired.

Tuttle v. Hunt seems to Jiave been decided upon the authority of Bennet v. Fuller, 4 Johns. 486; and Putnam v. Man was decided upon the same authority as that of Tuttle v. Hunt. An examination of Bennet v. Fuller shows it to ¡have been decided upon the grounds, that “ The practice of deputing the plaintiff to serve his own writ has been of long duration,” and, therefore, it would be going too far to say that the plaintiff could not, in any case, serve a writ in his .own favor.

Section .3156 of the Code,., however, expressly prohibits a party to the action being deputized to serve a mandate in that action.

*545If the practice which formerly prevailed has been expressly prohibited, it seems to me that the rule deduced from that practice must also be considered as abrogated.

I believe it to be the plain intent of the Code, that no person who is a party to an action shall serve a summons in that action. Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 425, 3156; Warring v. Keeler, 11 Misc. Rep. 451; Decker v. Ekelman, 17 id. 665.

The judgment should be reversed, upon the ground that no jurisdiction was acquired by the service of the summons.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
§ 579.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
§ 800.1002 Effect of determinations. ( a ) A determination under § 800.1001(a) shall take effect immediately upon publication of a notice of such determination under § 800.1001(c) and remain in effect unless rescinded under § 800.1001(b).
( b ) A rescission of a determination under § 800.1001(b) shall take effect on the date specified in the notice published under § 800.1001(c).
( c ) A determination under § 800.1001(a) does not apply to any transaction for which a declaration or notice has been accepted by the Staff Chairperson under § 800.405(a)(1) or § 800.503(a), respectively.
( d ) A rescission of a determination under § 800.1001(b) does not apply to any transaction for which: ( 1 ) The completion date is prior to the date upon which the rescission of a determination under paragraph (b) of this section becomes effective; or
( 2 ) The following has occurred before publication of the rescission of determination under § 800.1001(c): ( i ) The parties to the transaction have executed a binding written agreement, or other binding document, establishing the material terms of the transaction that is ultimately consummated;
( ii ) A party has made a public offer to shareholders to buy shares of a U.S. business; or
( iii ) A shareholder has solicited proxies in connection with an election of the board of directors of a U.S. business or has requested the conversion of convertible voting securities.
#### § 904.3 Preservation of evidence.

Referring agencies must take care to preserve all files and records that may be needed by the Department of Justice to prove their claims in court. Agencies ordinarily should include certified copies of the documents that form the basis for the claim in the packages referring their claims to the Department of Justice for litigation. Agencies shall provide originals of such documents immediately upon request by the Department of Justice.
§ 576.502 Effect of license or authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of such license or other authorization, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction or license is issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any other part of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license specifically refers to such part.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction otherwise prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property which would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2750 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2750

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to delay the application of 
   the substantiation requirements to reimbursement arrangements of 
                            certain loggers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 1995

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to delay the application of 
   the substantiation requirements to reimbursement arrangements of 
                            certain loggers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIATION REQUIREMENTS TO 
              LOGGERS.

    (a) In General.--In the case of any taxable year beginning before 
January 1, 1993--
            (1) a qualified logger reimbursement arrangement shall be 
        treated as an accountable plan for purposes of section 62(c) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and
            (2) payments to an employee under such arrangement shall be 
        deductible under section 62(a)(2) of such Code.
    (b) Qualified Logger Reimbursement Arrangement.--For purposes of 
subsection (a), the term ``qualified logger reimbursement arrangement'' 
means a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement in the 
timber industry under which a percentage (not greater than 25 percent) 
of a logger's compensation is treated as reimbursement for the use of 
the logger's chain saw.
    (c) Waiver of Limitations.--If refund or credit of any overpayment 
of tax resulting from the application of subsection (a) is prevented at 
any time before the close of the 1-year period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of law 
(including res judicata), such refund or credit may nevertheless be 
made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the close of such 
period.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... annual report[electronic resource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:H 12/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635264
 
September 16, 2019
HomeBureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation  Releases

# Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation Releases

280 items

        -    DipNote  		Countering the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction	  February 21, 2024 
        -    Testimony  		Testimony Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs “AUKUS Implementation and Challenges to International Security and Arms Control in the 21st Century”	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsFebruary 14, 2024Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at “Hostage Diplomacy as an International Security Threat: Strengthening Our Collective Action, Deterrence, and Response”	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 13, 2024Woodrow Wilson International Center for ScholarsWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Jenkins’s Closing Remarks at the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsFebruary 2, 2024Marrakech, Morocco 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Marrakesh Co-Chairs’ Summary	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  February 2, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Imposing Sanctions on Those Supporting Iran’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and Missile Production	  Matthew MillerFebruary 2, 2024 
        -    		Lowell H. Schwartz	  February 1, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Under Secretary Jenkins’s Press Statement Following Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event Opening Ceremonies	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsJanuary 31, 2024Marrakech, Morocco 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Jenkins’s Opening Remarks at the Proliferation Security Initiative African Political Meeting and Outreach Event	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsJanuary 31, 2024Marrakech, Morocco 

previous page123456…28next page

Back to Top