alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-2436

Lower Tribunal No. 75-11762B

________________

William Charles Richardson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stephen

T. Millan, Judge.

William Charles Richardson, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On February 21, 2018, the Court affirmed the denial of William

Richardson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. On the same date, the Court

ordered Richardson to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing

further pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other pleadings in this Court relating

to lower tribunal case F75-11762.

Upon consideration of Richardson’s response to the order to show cause and

the successive, duplicative, pro se petitions and appeals brought by Richardson, we

conclude that good cause has not been shown. Richardson has engaged in the

filing of meritless, frivolous, and successive claims, continuing to seek relief from

this Court notwithstanding prior adverse determinations on the merits.1

In accordance with State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), and

Concepcion v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), Richardson is

prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or petitions

relating to his conviction, judgment, and sentence in lower tribunal case F75-

11762. We direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to

accept any such papers relating to the circuit court case number unless they have

been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The

1 Richardson failed to provide any response that would justify such filings; see the

trial court’s orders in the circuit court case entered October 13, 2017, June 24,

2016, September 24, 2015, and April 12, 2013, as well as this Court’s opinions and

orders in Case Nos. 3D17-2051, 3D16-2162, 3D16-1825, 3D15-1936, 3D15-530,

and 3D13-2045.

2
Florida Bar in good standing. See Whipple v. State, 112 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA

2013). 

Additionally, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by Richardson

may subject him to appropriate sanctions, including the issuance of written

findings forwarded to the Department of Corrections for its consideration of

disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla.

Stat. (2017).

3
#### § 542.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
§ 546.302 Blocked account; blocked property. The terms *blocked account* and *blocked property* mean any account or property subject to the prohibitions in § 546.201 held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 546.201, or in which such person has an interest, and with respect to which payments, transfers, exportations, withdrawals, or other dealings may not be made or effected except pursuant to a license or other authorization from OFAC expressly authorizing such action. Note 1 to § 546.302 :
See § 546.411 concerning the blocked status of property and interests in property of an entity that is directly or indirectly owned, whether individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 546.201.
[74 FR 25432, May 28, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 78473, Dec. 21, 2022; 89 FR 15748, Mar. 5, 2024]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7392** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOHN FRANCIS WASHINGTON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:11

- cr - 00380

- RWT

- 1; 8:13

- cv - 01893

- RWT )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. John Francis Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Falk Lenzner, INVESTIGATIVE GROUP INTERNATIONAL, Washington, DC; Nicolas A. Mitchell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland; Paul Nitze, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Francis Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 )
mot ion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deba table, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a ce rtificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 35.5  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE
MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-CD2 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  /s/ Leslie HaytonLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[PUBLIC NOTICE 6734]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Vermeer's Masterpiece: The Milkmaid''

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 19, 2009, notice was published on page 29262 of the 
Federal Register (volume 74, number 117) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ``Vermeer's Masterpiece: 
The Milkmaid.'' The referenced notice is corrected as to additional 
objects to be included in the exhibition. Pursuant to the authority 
vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as 
amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 
19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Vermeer's Masterpiece: The Milkmaid,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about September 9, 2009, until 
on or about November 29, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 11, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-20146 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[110th Congress Public Law 304]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ304.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3005]]

Public Law 110-304
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Miami, 
Florida, as the ``Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
            Center''. <<NOTE: Aug. 12, 2008 -  [H.R. 4918]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, 
                              MIAMI, FLORIDA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Miami, Florida, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center''. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the Bruce W. Carter Department 
of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

    Approved August 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4918:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            June 24, 26, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Jack Pearlstein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cision Ltd.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ Jack Pearlstein    
|                     |  | Jack Pearlstein        
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 589.304 Correspondent account.

The term *correspondent account* means an account established by a U.S. financial institution for a foreign financial institution to receive deposits from, or to make payments on behalf of, the foreign financial institution, or to handle other financial transactions related to such foreign financial institution.
Exhibit 4.1







 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


August 28, 2012


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Diversified Income and Growth
Trust, Series 3


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Diversified Income and Growth Trust, Series 3 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on August 28, 2012, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-183320) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO
CIPRIANO                      


Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 27, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862612
<NAME> UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           8,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,176
<INVENTORY>                                    186,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               451,585
<PP&E>                                         639,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                 290,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,099,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,255
<BONDS>                                        865,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (284,842)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,099,871
<SALES>                                        921,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,497
<CGS>                                          554,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  781,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (27,066)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,063
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,245
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,846
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 1, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1211 Lower Tribunal No. F05

- 5281A

________________ 

### Raudel Robinson , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull , Judge. Raudel Robinson , in proper person. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Kseniya Smychkouskaya, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Ra udel Robinson appeals the trial court’s “Order Denying ‘Defendant’s Second or Successive Motion f or Post

- Conviction Relief Newly Discovered Evidence/Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. ’ ” Upon review of the record and the previous filings by Robinson and d ispositions by this C ourt thereof, we affirm

. S ee Placide v. State , 189 So. 3d 810, 814 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (finding that the information in an affidavit alleging the jurors were witnessed prejudging the case could have been discovered with due diligence and was inherently incredible because the affiant was a close family friend who withheld this knowledge for 21 years); Rivero v. State , 15 So. 3d 625 , 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ( holding that d efendant was not entitled to a hearing on his second post

- convictio n motion based on alleged newly discovered evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations, as there was no allegation or proof that the “newly discovered evidence” was unknown to the court, parties, or counsel at the time of trial a nd could not have been timely discovered with due diligence); s ee a lso Martinez v. State , 265 So. 3d 690 , 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) ( finding that t he record conclusively refuted defendant ’ s post

conviction claim that his defense counsel failed to communicate pretrial plea offers ranging from 5 to 10 years in prison in exchange for a guilty plea, where the record reflected counsel for both parties denied the existence of3 any plea offers at t he onset of jury selection); Morgan v. State , 912 So. 2d 642 , 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ( holding that defendant failed to show that trial counsel ’ s alleged failure to communicate a plea offer to him was newly discovered evidence that could be considered unde r the exception to the
two

- year time limit for filing a motion for post

- conviction relief, where the defendant failed to allege how he obtained information about the plea offer and why he could not have obtained it earlier by the use of due diligence withi n the two

- year period). Affirmed.
www.gpo.gov

### §962. Acceptance of contributions and prosecution of projects; cooperative programs to promote health and safety education and training; use of funds for costs of mine rescue and survival operations

The Secretary is authorized to accept lands, buildings, equipment, and other contributions from public and private sources and to prosecute projects in cooperation with other agencies, Federal, State, or private; the Mine Safety and Health Administration is authorized to promote health and safety education and training in the mining community through cooperative programs with States, industry, and safety associations; and any funds available to the Department may be used, with the approval of the Secretary, to provide for the costs of mine rescue and survival operations in the event of a major disaster.

(Pub. L. 105–78, title I, Nov. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1475.)

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited as the credit to this section, and not as part of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(e) [title I], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–240.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(d) [title I], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–218; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.

Pub. L. 103–333, title I, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2545.

Pub. L. 103–112, title I, Oct. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 1088.

Pub. L. 102–394, title I, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1797.

Pub. L. 102–170, title I, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1112.

Pub. L. 101–517, title I, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2195.

Pub. L. 101–166, title I, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1164.

Pub. L. 100–436, title I, Sept. 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 1686.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(h) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–256, 1329–262.

Pub. L. 99–500, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title I], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–287, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title I], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–287.

Pub. L. 99–178, title I, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1107.

Pub. L. 98–619, title I, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3310.

Pub. L. 98–139, title I, Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 876.

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(e)(1) [title I], Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1878, 1883.

Pub. L. 97–92, §101(a) [H.R. 4560, title I], Dec. 15, 1981, 95 Stat. 1183.

Pub. L. 96–536, §101(a) [incorporating H.R. 4389, title I, for FY 1980], Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3166.

Pub. L. 96–123, §101(g) [H.R. 4389, title I], Nov. 20, 1979, 93 Stat. 925.

Pub. L. 95–480, title I, Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1570.

Pub. L. 95–355, title I, Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 529.