alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1014

      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 1995

  Mr. Hastings of Washington introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitation of section 13 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC 
Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend until May 31, 
2001, the time required for the licensee to commence the construction 
of such project. This section shall take effect for the project upon 
the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission under section 
13) of the period required for commencement of construction of such 
project. If the license for FERC Project 3701 should expire prior to 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission is authorized and 
directed to reinstate effective June 1, 1995, the license previously 
issued for such project, to extend until May 31, 2001, the time 
required for the licensee to commence the construction of such project.
                                 <all>
```
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Carlos Limon Vazquez

# 									Carlos Limon Vazquez							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

Carlos Limon Vazquez allegedly operates clandestine fentanyl laboratories for the Sinaloa Cartel, where fentanyl precursor chemicals imported from China are processed into fully formed fentanyl for subsequent importation into the United States.

According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), in 2022 it seized over 57 million fentanyl-laced counterfeit prescription pills and over 13,000 pounds of fentanyl powder — the equivalent of about 410 million potentially deadly fentanyl doses.  The Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Carlos Limon Vazquez and others charging them with Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, Possession of Machine guns & Destructive Devices, Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Carlos Limon Vazquez.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsChinaDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Burma Regime Attack in Kachin State

# 									Burma Regime Attack in Kachin State							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

October 10, 2023

We are deeply concerned by reports of a Burma military attack on an internally displaced persons camp near Mung Lai Hkyet village in Kachin State on October 9. Early reports indicate dozens of civilians were killed. We strongly condemn the military regime’s ongoing attacks that have claimed thousands of lives since the February 2021 coup and continue to exacerbate the region’s most severe humanitarian crisis. More than 1.6 million people have been internally displaced since the coup.

The United States will continue to support the people of Burma and all those working peacefully to support their aspirations for peace and inclusive democracy.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaConflictsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Joshua Harris

# 				Joshua Harris			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for North Africa						Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs												

				July 18, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
#### § 566.317 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
* District Judge of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by

designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 92-3995

_____________

ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

DAVID L. RAMSEY, Secretary, Department of Health and Hospitals, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

__________________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion September 22, 5th Cir., 1993, 3d )

(November 26, 1993)

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges, and ZAGEL *

, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the

above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

However, the pane l opinion reported at 3 F.3d 797 is amended, by

the addition of footnote 19 to the last paragraph of the opinion,

as follows:This Court cannot endorse such a pro forma compliance with the

findings requirement of the Boren Amendment. LDHH's inability to

articulate an orderly process of evaluation or to identify specific

documents reviewed renders suspect its "findings" and renders

meritless its argument that it engaged in a bona fide findings

process. Because we find that LDHH, as a matter of law, failed to

comply in practice with the Boren Amendment findings requirement,

this Court REVERSES the district court's grant of LDH H's summary

judgment motion and denial of the Hospitals' summary judgment

motion. This case is REMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent

with this opinion. 19

____________________

19 We express no view on whether the Hospitals' summary judgment motion

may be defeated, in part or in whole, by various affirmative defenses which were neither ruled on in the district court nor argued in this Court.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

_______________________________ United States Circuit Judge
HomeOffice of Global Food Security...Office of Global Food Security  Releases

# Office of Global Food Security Releases

100 items

        -    Report  		Food Security Action Report	  September 21, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Declaration of Leaders’ Summit on Global Food Security	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Global Food Security Summit	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 20, 2022InterContinental HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Press Statement  		Arrival of Wheat-Carrying Brave Commander to East Africa from Ukraine	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 30, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Food Security Assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa	  August 8, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for Global Food Security Fowler Travels to the United Nations For Special Event with the Committee on World Food Security	  July 18, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		Feed the Future – Ukraine Fact Sheet	  July 7, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		G7 Statement on Global Food Security	  June 28, 2022 
        -    White House Release  		President Biden and G7 Leaders Announce Further Efforts to Counter Putin’s Attack on Food Security	  June 28, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Chair’s Statement: Roadmap for Global Food Security – Call to Action	  June 24, 2022 

previous page1…45678…10next page

Back to Top
§ 536.513 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( 1 ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( 2 ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( 3 ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing;
( 4 ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and
( 5 ) The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
( b ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
[87 FR 78471, Dec. 21, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY D. TURNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 97 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10 th day of February , 202 3

, the “ Nunc Pro Tunc Notice of Appeal,”

treated as a Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc

,

and the “Petition for Default and Summary Judgment” are DENIED.
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 00-60A - North American Free Trade Agreement and Specialty Air Services Operations (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 00-60A
- Title
- North American Free Trade Agreement and Specialty Air Services Operations
- Date cancelled
- 2014-02-12
- Cancellation notes
- AC 00-60B
- Date issued
- 2008-02-08
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-820
- Description
-  	Provides information for aircraft operators from the United States who plan to conduct specialty air services (SAS) operations in Canada or Mexico in accordance with the North American Free Trade Agreement. It also provides information for aircraft operators from Canada or Mexico who plan to conduct SAS operations in the U.S. 
- Content
-    -  00-60A with Chg 1 Included  (PDF) 
  -  AC 00-60A.pdf  (PDF) 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate00-60North American Free Trade Agreement and Specialty Air Services Operations												Provides information for aircraft operators from the United States who plan to conduct specialty air services (SAS) operations in Canada or Mexico in accordance with the North American Free Trade Agreement. It also provides information for aircraft operators from Canada or Mexico who plan to conduct SAS operations in the U.S. 											1999-11-09 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
§ 548.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201; or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property pursuant to § 548.201.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201, also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
#### HENRY A. UTERHART ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. B.; 240 TJ. S. B., 598.]

*On the plaintiff's appeal.*

No opinion was delivered by the court below, but judgment was rendered for the defendants. On appeal the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded with direction to enter judgment in favor of the appellants.

The Supreme Court decided:

The right to succeed to property of a decedent depends upon and is regulated by State law. *Knowlton*v. *Moore,*178 U. S., 41.

The judicial construction of a will by a State court of competent jurisdiction determines not only legally but practically the extent and character of the interests taken by the legatees.

The court of the State in which the decedent’s will was probated, and having jurisdiction to construe the same, having decided that, as to the residuary estate, the will involved in this case constituted a trust continuing until after July 1, 1902, and that no beneficiary was entitled to receive anything except on affirmative exercise of discretion conferred upon the executors and trustees, *held*that the interests of the residuary legatees were contingent and not vested prior to July 1, 1902, within the meaning of the refunding act of June 27, 1902, except as to such amounts as were actually paid to the legatees prior to that date by the trustees in the exercise of their discretion.

Mr. Justice Pitney

delivered tbe opinion of the Supreme Court April 3, 1916.
40421.

#### LYNCH v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

1. The defendant having made an unsworn statement to the court and jury in his defense, the court erred in charging the jury to the effect that the defendant had the right to testify under oath as any other witness and to be examined and cross examined as any other witness, and in connection with such charge stating to the jury, “Now, the defendant in this case elected to make an unsworn statement.” *Code*§ 38-415, as amended by Ga. L. 1962, pp. 133, 134, provides in part: “The failure of a defendant to testify shall create no presumption against him, and no comment shall be *651made because of such failure.” The court erred in overruling the second special ground of defendant’s motion for a new trial assigning error because of such charge. *McCann v. State,*108 Ga. App. 316 (132 SE2d 813).

Decided November 14, 1963.

*Allyn M. Wallace,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cohen Anderson, Solicitor General,*contra.

2. The first special ground of the motion relates to a matter not likely- to occur on another trial; the third special ground is not meritorious, and the general grounds are not passed upon inasmuch as the evidence on another trial may not be the same.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
#### § 548.303 Debt.

The term *debt* as used in § 548.202 includes bonds, loans, extensions of credit, loan guarantees, letters of credit, drafts, bankers' acceptances, discount notes or bills, or commercial paper.
39916.

#### LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA v. BURKE.

Decided September 26, 1963.

*Clement E. Sutton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walton Hardin,*contra.

Russell, Judge.

The decision of this court in *Life Ins. Co. of Ga. v. Burke,*107 Ga. App. 621 (131 SE2d 206) having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia *(Life Ins. Co. of Ga. v. Burke,*219 Ga. 214 (132 SE2d 737) the judgment of the Court of Appeals is accordingly vacated herewith and the judgment of the trial court overruling the motion for new trial is reversed in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Judges concur.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William G.Manias, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Texas Eastern ProductsPipeline Company, LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ WILLIAM G. MANIAS                                          |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William G. Manias                                              |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                     |
| Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC,  General Partner |
|                                                           |
| November 7, 2006                                               |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toTEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,571]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on July 7, 2009 by a company official on behalf of workers of InteDent Service Corporation, Stockton, California.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-71,328) filed on June 22, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of August 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-20466 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 340.7 Deposits—retention—return.

Each bid must be accompanied by a deposit in the amount specified in the public notice. The deposit of any successful bidder will be retained as security for the performance of his obligation and will be applied toward payment of the bonds. All other deposits will be returned immediately. No interest will be allowed on account of any deposits.
#### § 553.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Central African Republic sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac.*
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

1.        The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (“Western Gas Resources”).  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Gas Resources for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.

 

2.        We certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Gas Resources.

 

This Certification is executed as of August 8, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Peter A.  Dea                                     |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter A. Dea,                                         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer and President                |
|   |                                                  |
|   |                                                  |
|   | /s/ William  J. Krysiak                               |   |
|   | William J.  Krysiak,                                  |
|   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                                                       |        |  |

 

----