alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION

I, Simon Clarke, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of American Lithium Corp.;

2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the issuer’s auditor and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: May 30, 2023 | By: | /s/ Simon Clarke
Simon Clarke
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 501.735 Proposed findings, conclusions and supporting briefs. ( a ) *Opportunity to file.* Before a decision is issued by the Administrative Law Judge, each party shall have an opportunity, reasonable in light of all the circumstances, to file in writing proposed findings and conclusions.
( b ) *Procedure.* Proposed findings of fact must be supported by citations to specific portions of the record. If successive filings are directed, the proposed findings and conclusions of the party assigned to file first shall be set forth in serially numbered paragraphs, and any counter statement of proposed findings and conclusions shall, in addition to any other matter presented, indicate those paragraphs of the proposals already filed as to which there is no dispute. A reply brief may be filed by the party assigned to file first, or, where simultaneous filings are directed, reply briefs may be filed by each party, within the period prescribed therefor by the Administrative Law Judge. No further briefs may be filed except with permission of the Administrative Law Judge.
( c ) *Time for filing.* In any proceeding in which a decision is to be issued: ( 1 ) At the close of each hearing, the Administrative Law Judge shall, by order, after consultation with the parties, prescribe the period within which proposed findings and conclusions and supporting briefs are to be filed. The party directed to file first shall make its initial filing not later than 30 days after the end of the hearing unless the Administrative Law Judge, for good cause shown, permits a different period and sets forth in the order the reasons why the different period is necessary.
( 2 ) The total period within which all such proposed findings and conclusions and supporting briefs and any counter statements of proposed findings and conclusions and reply briefs are to be filed shall be no longer than 90 days after the close of the hearing unless the Administrative Law Judge, for good cause shown, permits a different period and sets forth in an order the reasons why the different period is necessary.
www.gpo.gov

### §1299. Study of reclamation standards for surface mining of other minerals

#### (a) Contract with National Academy of Sciences-National Academy of Engineering; requirements

The Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality is directed to contract to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts with the National Academy of Sciences-National Academy of Engineering, other Government agencies or private groups as appropriate, for an in-depth study of current and developing technology for surface and open pit mining and reclamation for minerals other than coal designed to assist in the establishment of effective and reasonable regulation of surface and open pit mining and reclamation for minerals other than coal. The study shall—

(1) assess the degree to which the requirements of this chapter can be met by such technology and the costs involved;

(2) identify areas where the requirements of this chapter cannot be met by current and developing technology;

(3) in those instances describe requirements most comparable to those of this chapter which could be met, the costs involved, and the differences in reclamation results between these requirements and those of this chapter; and

(4) discuss alternative regulatory mechanisms designed to insure the achievement of the most beneficial postmining land use for areas affected by surface and open pit mining.

#### (b) Submittal of study with legislative recommendation to President and Congress

The study together with specific legislative recommendations shall be submitted to the President and the Congress no later than eighteen months after August 3, 1977: *Provided*, That, with respect to surface or open pit mining for sand and gravel the study shall be submitted no later than twelve months after August 3, 1977: *Provided further*, That with respect to mining for oil shale and tar sands that a preliminary report shall be submitted no later than twelve months after August 3, 1977.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of this section $500,000: *Provided*, That no new budget authority is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1977.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title VII, §709, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 522.)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11155

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OCARIO RUIZ, also known as Oscar Ruiz,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-73-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ocario Ruiz, federal prisoner # 16491-075, is serving a 360-month term 

of imprisonment following his conviction for one charge of conspiracy to possess 

500 grams or more of cocaine with intent to distribute. He appeals the district 

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of sentence 

based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 11, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11155 Document: 00513420565 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2016
No. 15-11155

2

lowered the base offense levels in the drug quantity table set forth in U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1(c). 

We have a duty to examine the basis of our jurisdiction even if we must 

do so sua sponte. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Ruiz’s 

notice of appeal was filed almost 11 months after entry of judgment and was 

thus untimely. See United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000); 

FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A). Nonetheless, because this issue is not jurisdictional, 

we pretermit it. See United States v. Martinez, 496 F.3d 387, 388 (5th Cir. 

2007). 

We review the denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). Section 

3582(c)(2) grants discretion to a district court to modify a sentence that was 

based on a guidelines range that was later lowered by the Sentencing 

Commission. § 3582(c)(2). 

The district court determined that Ruiz was ineligible for a § 3582(c)(2) 

reduction because his base offense level was not changed by Amendment 782. 

Ruiz’s failure to dispute this reasoning has the same effect as if he had not 

appealed the district court’s judgment at all. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County 

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); see also United States 

v. Delgado, 672 F.3d 320, 328 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

Ruiz’s argument that he was entitled to § 3582(c)(2) relief because he 

should not have been sentenced as a career offender, which is raised for the 

first time on appeal, is unavailing because claims regarding the validity of the

original conviction and sentence are not cognizable in a § 3582(c)(2) motion. 

See United States v. Hernandez, 645 F.3d 709, 712 (5th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11155 Document: 00513420565 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 43704)    
*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; RFA AT09-003 Tools for assessing manual therapies (SBIR).                    

*Date:*                         September 23, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ray Bramhall, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *bramhallr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 20, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20629 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Casey  Casavant

# 				Casey Casavant			

				Third-Party Contractor			

Deceased				January 23, 2007			

**DS Public Affairs has been unable to locate the source of this image to seek permission for its use. Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have additional information.**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIraq

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20467]



[[Page 43168]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,574]


Win On, Inc., Brooklyn, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 30, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by on behalf of workers of Win On, Inc., Brooklyn, New 
York.
    Petitions filed by a group of adversely affected workers must be 
filed by at least three workers within one year of worker separations. 
The investigation revealed that two of the petitioners were separated 
more than one year prior to the date of petition. Consequently, the 
petition has been deemed invalid, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of July 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-20467 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
STATE OFMARYLAND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

MARTIN O'MALLEY GOVERNOR STATEHOUSE 100 STATE CIRCLE ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21401·1925 (410) 974·3901 (TOLL FREE) 1·8()()..811·8336 TTY USERS CALL VIA MD RELAY May 27,2010

Shawn M. Garvin, Administrator EPA Region III (3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103 Dear Administrator Garvin: The StateofMaryland is requesting that the site known as "SauerDump" located 4225 Lynhurst Road, Dundalk, 21222 in BaltimoreCounty, Maryland be placed on the National Priorities List. The Maryland Department ofthe Environment has provided regulatory oversight ofthe environmental assessment and investigation in conjunction with the Environmental Protection Agency, Region III. The site was used as an unpermitted dump and salvage yard that was tilled with a variety ofwastes that includeheavy metals and polychlorinated biphenyls or "PCBs." To date, the responsible parties have not agreed to a cleanup remedy that adequately protects publichealth and the environment. Cleanup through the National Priorities List Program will ensure protection ofpublic health and Maryland's waterways. The Maryland Department ofthe Environment has provided the necessary information for youragencyto complete the scoringpackage and the preliminary score for the site exceeds the necessary minimum score of 28.5. As such, Maryland supports the listing process and concurs with the decision to placethe site on the 

### NPL. Ifyou would like to discuss this further, please contact Secretary Shari T. Wilson ofthe Maryland Department ofthe Environment at 410-537-3084, toll free 800-633-6101, by mail at 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21230 orbye-mail atstwilson@mde.state.md.us.

Governor
cc: Shari T. Wilson, Secretary, Maryland Departmentofthe Environment
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs...Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Releases

603 items

        -    		Science	   
        -    		Environment	   
        -    		About the U.S. ECS Project	   
        -    		The Ocean	   
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    		Working Procedures of the U.S.-Panama Secretariat for Environmental Enforcement Matters (Spanish)	  October 3, 2018 
        -    		Working Procedures of the U.S.-Panama Secretariat for Environmental Enforcement Matters (English)	  October 3, 2018 
        -    		Decision No. 2 of the U.S.-Panama Environmental Affairs Council in Reference to the Working Procedures of the U.S.-Panama Secretariat for Environmental Enforcement Matters (Spanish)	  October 3, 2018 
        -    		Decision No. 2 of the U.S.-Panama Environmental Affairs Council in Reference to the Working Procedures of the U.S.-Panama Secretariat for Environmental Enforcement Matters (English)	  October 3, 2018 
        -    		Joint Communiqué of the U.S.-Panama Environmental Affairs Council and Environmental Cooperation Commission (Spanish)	  October 3, 2018 

previous page1…5758596061next page

Back to Top
#### Pickawaik Estate

*William F. Fox,*for accountant.

November 23, 1953.

Holland, P. J.,

This is a supplemental adjudication, as above indicated, for the pur*56pose of disposing of the legacy contained in item 2 of the will. This item gave to Frank Pickawaik, a son of testator, $1,000, conditioned upon his appearing to claim the same within a period of 10 years from the death of testator but, if he did not so appear and claim the legacy within that period it was to go into the residue and be distributed in accordance with his direction as to the residue. The residue is left to his son, John C. Pickawaik.

Testator died November 14, 1942, so that the 10-year period expired November 14, 1952. A hearing was had November 20, 1953, at which it was proved to the satisfaction of the court that Frank Pickawaik has not, within the period of 10 years, appeared to claim the legacy and, in fact, has not appeared up to the time of the hearing to claim the legacy. The legacy, less inheritance tax and together with interest it has accumulated, which appears to be in the total sum of $1,075.51, is still in the possession of the surviving executor, John Wargo. It would be payable to the residuary beneficiary John C. Pickawaik, but he died January 27, 1943, subsequent to the death of testator, whereby he died vested with the residue and the same would be due his estate. John C. Pickawaik, by his will, gave his entire estate to his brother Thomas Pickawaik and appointed Thomas Pickawaik’s wife, Caroline Pickawaik, as his executor. Since John C. Pickawaik has been deceased for a period of almost 11 years, no consideration need be given to creditors of his estate as all claims against his estate would have long since been outlawed by this time. Therefore, to avoid circuity of action, the court is impelled to award the legacy in the above-mentioned sum to the residuary beneficiary under the will of John C. Pickawaik direct, less 10 percent inheritance tax, and less the costs of this proceeding, counsel fee, and additional compensation to the surviving executor. . . .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,732,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  476,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,209,490
<PP&E>                                      21,691,253
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,751,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,181,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,907,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,181,390
<SALES>                                      3,738,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,463,491
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,826,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                636,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            636,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   636,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.29
        

</TABLE>
^^•,i"'V^:^.j/,;;.\;r-^.-V \ 

# Allianc e , ; ^Wmmr'^-'' ^ ^-'''"'''' ' Cit y o f Allianc e • ' • - I OrEl'liUi o Nebrask a : ^ < 3 2
Marc h 18,201 1 T o Who mI

t Ma y Concern : Allianc e Municipa l Aiipor t an dth e City o f

Allianc e appreciat e tha

t Great Lake s Aviatio n wis h t o continu e thei r

ai r servic e i n Alliance . W e wan t

th e airport

t o b e aviabl e optio n o f transportation . Eri c Len z an dmysel f ou r currentl y workin g wit

h Great Lake s t o promot e ou r airport an dhop e t o se e a n increas e i n passenge r

usage . W e wan t

t o b e adependabl e optio n for bot h busines s an dpleasur e travelers . Eri c Len z an dI loo k forwar dt o formin g astronge r workin g relationshi p wit

h Great Lake s Aviation . Again , w e ar e gratefu l fo r Great Lakes ' commitmen t

t o our community .

Than k you , Lyn n M , Place k Airpor t Operation s Manage r Cit yo f Allianc e
#### § 544.309 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property and, without limitation upon the foregoing, shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.