alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 375.2 What special definitions apply to this rule?

The definitions in 31 CFR part 356 govern this part except as follows:

*Accrued interest* means an amount payable by the Treasury as part of the settlement amount for the interest income earned between the last interest payment date up to and including the settlement date.

*Bank* means the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

*Customer* means a person or entity on whose behalf a submitter has been directed to submit an offer of a specified amount of securities in a specific redemption operation.

*Minimum offer amount* means the smallest par amount of a security that may be offered to the Treasury. We will state the minimum offer amount in the redemption operation announcement.

*Multiple* means the smallest additional par amount of a security that may be offered to the Treasury. We will state the multiple in the redemption operation announcement.

*Offer* means an offer to deliver for redemption a stated par amount of a specific security to the Treasury at a stated price.

*Price* means the dollar amount to be paid for a security expressed as a percent of its current par amount.

*Privately held amount* means the total amount outstanding of a security less holdings of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Government accounts.

*Redemption amount* means the maximum par amount of securities that we are planning to redeem through a redemption operation. We will state the redemption amount in the redemption operation announcement.

*Redemption operation* means a competitive process by which the Treasury accepts offers of marketable Treasury securities that by their terms are not immediately payable.

*Security* means an outstanding unmatured obligation of the United States Government that the Secretary is authorized to buy, redeem or refund under section 3111 of Title 31 of the United States Code.

*Settlement* means full and complete delivery of and payment for securities redeemed.

*Settlement amount* means the par amount of each security that we redeem, multiplied by the price we accept in a redemption operation, plus any accrued interest.

*Settlement date* means the date specified in the redemption operation announcement on which you must deliver a security to the Treasury for payment.

*Submitter* means an entity submitting offers directly to the Treasury for its own account, for the account of others, or both. (See § 375.11(a)).

*Tender* means a computer transmission or document submitted in a redemption operation that contains one or more offers.

*We* (“us”) means the Secretary of the Treasury and his or her delegates, including the Treasury Department, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, and their representatives. The term also includes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, acting as fiscal agent of the United States.

*You* means a prospective submitter in a redemption operation.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 11031 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. LE VONE RAY M ADEN D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U S D C N o . 1 :07 -C R -5 8 -1 B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS , a n dP R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * A p p ea l i n g th e J u d gm en t i n a C ri m i n a lC a se, L ev on e R a y M a d en pr ese n ts ar gum ent s t hathe c onc ede s ar e f or ec l os ed by Un i t e dS t a t e s v . B ro wn , 920 F. 2d 1 2 1 2 , 1 2 1 6 -1 7 ( 5 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ), abrogat e d on ot hergrounds by Uni t e d S t at e s v. Ca n d ia , 454 F . 3d468 , 472
- 73 (5t h C i r. 200 6) , w h i ch h el d that a d istr i ctcourt m a y o rd er a term of i m p ri son m en t t o ru n con secu tive l y w i tha n u n i m p ose dstate United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 11031

2 s e nt e nc e . The a ppe l l ant ’ s m o t i o n f o rs um m ar y di s po s i t i o n i s G RA N T E D , a nd t h e j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,499 & AP-76,500

EX PARTE CALVIN JARROD HESTER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 54,997-01-E & 54,996-01-E

IN THE 108 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered open pleas of guilty

to two charges of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and was sentenced to thirty

years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Hester v. State, Nos.

07-07-0474-CR & 07-07-0475-CR (Tex. App. – Amarillo, November 19, 2009). 

Applicant contendsthat his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
2

failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise him of

his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit and other

evidence in the habeas record, it appears that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that

his convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary

review pro se. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time

petitions for discretionary review of the judgments of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause Nos.

07-07-0474-CR and 07-07-0475-CR that affirmed his convictions in Cause Nos. 54,996-E and

54,997-E from the 108th Judicial District Court of Potter County. Applicant shall file his petitions

for discretionary review with the Seventh Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: February 9, 2011

Do not publish
§ 560.518 Transactions in Iranian-origin and Iranian government property. Except for transactions involving the Government of Iran, an Iranian financial institution, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211, and provided that paragraph (a) of this section does not affect the status of property blocked pursuant to part 535 or this part or detained or seized, or subject to detention or seizure, pursuant to this part, the following transactions are authorized: ( a ) All domestic transactions with respect to Iranian-origin goods located in the United States other than goods blocked pursuant to § 560.211.
( b ) Transactions by a United States person with third-country nationals incidental to the storage and maintenance in third countries of Iranian-origin goods owned prior to May 7, 1995, by that United States person or acquired thereafter by that United States person consistent with the provisions of this part;
( c ) Exportation of Iranian-origin household and personal effects from the United States incident to the relocation of United States persons outside the United States; and
( d ) The use or disposition by a United States person of Iranian-origin household and personal effects that are located outside the United States and that have been acquired by the United States person in transactions not prohibited by part 535 or this part.
Note to § 560.518 :
*See* § 560.543 for an authorization to engage in all transactions necessary and ordinarily incident to the sale of certain real and personal property located in Iran.
[77 FR 64666, Oct. 22, 2012, as amended at 83 FR 55271, Nov. 5, 2018]
www.gpo.gov

### §1734. Guidance on eligibility verification

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall provide guidance and technical assistance, to States and service delivery areas, relating to the documentation required to verify the eligibility of participants under parts A, B, and C of subchapter II of this chapter, particularly the hard-to-serve individuals specified in section 1603(b) of this title and subsections (b) and (d) of section 1643 of this title. Such documentation shall, to the extent practicable, be uniform and standard.

#### (b) Guidance

The guidance provided pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, while maintaining program integrity, shall—

(1) limit the documentation burden to the minimum necessary to adequately verify such eligibility; and

(2) ensure, to the extent practicable, that the documentation requirements shall not discourage the participation of eligible individuals.

#### (c) Contents

The guidance provided pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall specifically address income eligibility, assessment, the determination regarding whether an individual is a hard-to-serve individual, and specific uniform or standardized documentation forms or procedures (including simplified standardized forms, automated intake procedures, and self-certification documents) and other documentation proxies (such as Job Corps eligibility forms).

#### (d) Date

The Secretary shall provide the guidance described in subsection (a) of this section not later than December 18, 1992.

(Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §454, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title IV, §403(b), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1084; amended Pub. L. 104–193, title I, §110(n)(12), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2174.)

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1734, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §454, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1383; Pub. L. 97–404, §4(c), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2026, related to evaluation of effectiveness of programs, activities, and projects authorized by this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–367, title IV, §403(a)(4), title VII, §701(a), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1084, 1103, effective July 1, 1993.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–193 struck out “JOBS and” before “Job Corps eligibility forms).”

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–193 effective July 1, 1997, with transition rules relating to State options to accelerate such date, rules relating to claims, actions, and proceedings commenced before such date, rules relating to closing out of accounts for terminated or substantially modified programs and continuance in office of Assistant Secretary for Family Support, and provisions relating to termination of entitlement under AFDC program, see section 116 of Pub. L. 104–193, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note under section 601 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1993, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 102–367 set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 1501 of this title.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141704

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141704 COA: 298532 Emmet CC: 09-003153-FH STEVEN MICHAEL ODUSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 26, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell VON JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 2001.

Decided Feb. 14, 2001.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Beth Farber, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, MD, for appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Bryan E. Foreman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, MD, for appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Von Jones was convicted after a jury trial of being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He received an enhanced sentence as an armed career crimi*159nal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). On appeal, he raises two nonmeritorious issues. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

First, we do not find that the district court abused its discretion by allowing a letter into evidence. *See*Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B); *Tome v. United States,*513 U.S. 150, 157-58, 115 S.Ct. 696, 130 L.Ed.2d 574 (1995); *United States v. Acker,*52 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.1995). Second, we do not find that the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), affects Jones’ enhanced sentence for being an armed career criminal. *United States v. Dorris,*236 F.3d 582, 587-88 (10th Cir.2000) (holding that § 924(e) sentence not affected by *Apprendi).*

Accordingly, we affirm Jones’ convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 551.703 Penalty imposition.

If, after considering any written response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and any relevant facts, OFAC determines that there was a violation by the alleged violator named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and that a civil monetary penalty is appropriate, OFAC may issue a Penalty Notice to the violator containing a determination of the violation and the imposition of the monetary penalty. For additional details concerning issuance of a Penalty Notice, see appendix A to part 501 of this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty Notice shall constitute final agency action. The violator has the right to seek judicial review of that final agency action in federal district court.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Military Assistance for Ukraine

# 											Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Military Assistance for Ukraine									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 12, 2023

The United States is today announcing a new package of weapons and equipment to support the people of Ukraine as they defend their country and their freedom against Russia’s aggression.

This package provides up to $200 million of arms and equipment under previously directed drawdowns for Ukraine. Capabilities provided in today’s package include air defense munitions, air defense system components, additional munitions for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, artillery ammunition (including 155mm and 105mm), High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile missiles, anti-armor munitions, small arms ammunition, a demolitions package, HESCO barriers, and spare parts, ancillary equipment, services, training, and transportation.

The United States and the coalition of more than 50 countries we have assembled continues to provide critical support for Ukraine’s forces. However, unless Congress take action to pass additional aid, this will be one of the last security assistance packages we will be able to provide Ukraine.

We continue to urge Congress to advance our national security interests by helping Ukraine defend itself and secure its future – a future in which its people rebuild and live safely in a resilient and thriving democracy.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsDefenseOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSecurityUkraineWeapons

Back to Top
# Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Colombia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary, because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft.

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*                     and to notify the Congress of this determination.                

[FR Doc. E9-20431

Billing code 4710-10-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Solar Energy TechnologiesProgram newsletter [electronic resource].**
 
2007: Jul | Oct
2008: Feb | Apr | Jul
2009: Mar | Jul | Sep | Oct-Dec
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.168: | E 10.35/2:
Item Number:0429-A-80 (online) | 0430-Q-26(online)
CGP systemNumber:000628241
 
September 9, 2019
#### § 551.306 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 20-131A**Date:**03/29/1993** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Airworthiness Approval of Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems (TCAS II) and Mode S Transponders** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part  25**Section Number(s):**Sec. 25.1301, Sec. 25.1303, Sec. 25.1307, Sec. 25.1309, Sec. 25.1321, Sec. 25.1322, Sec. 25.1331, Sec. 25.1335, Sec. 25.1351, Sec. 25.1353, Sec. 25.1355, Sec. 25.1357, Sec. 25.1381, Sec. 25.1431, Sec. 25.1541, Sec. 25.1581, Sec. 25.1585, Sec. 25.301, Sec. 25.303, Sec. 25.305, Sec. 25.561, Sec. 25.603, Sec. 25.609, Sec. 25.629** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**ANM-110** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(06)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(06)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

CAREER PROFILE SUPPLEMENT -

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeOffice of Logistics Management...About Us – Office of Logistics Management

# 									About Us							

Office of Logistics Management

## Logistics Operations (OPS)

        - Arrange for travel, transportation, & warehousing for employees and families           - Packing and shipping of household effects, including personally owned vehicles
          - Storing of household effects in Hagerstown and at commercial facilities nationwide
          - Despatch Agents in Baltimore, Brownsville, Dulles, Miami, New York, & Seattle
          - European Logistics Support Office (ELSO) in Antwerp, Belgium             - Storage and transshipment for posts in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East
            - Manage forward-deployed supply system via the Expedited Logistics Program with RPSO 
          - Yearly totals include 30,000 shipments, 26 million pounds of household effects in storage, 50,000 travel transactions arranged through the AMEX Travel Management Center, & 5,500 receipts & 4,000 lines of inventory in secure warehouses 
        - Manage the purchase & inventory of overseas motor vehicles           - 6,300 vehicles in overseas inventory 

## Program Management and Policy (PMP)

        - Develop and deploy logistics systems
        - Manage the diplomatic pouch and mail systems           - Accompanied and unaccompanied pouches between Washington and posts
          - 184,000 pouches and 8 million pounds of materials sent annually from Washington
          - Average transit time to posts overseas: less than 3 days
          - Domestic mail services for the Department’s Washington offices 
        - Develop and maintain logistics policy
        - Provide professional development & training opportunities for A/LM & the worldwide logistics and GSO community
        - Provide operational support to over 1100 purchase-card holders worldwide
        - Manage the Department’s property management program           - Worldwide oversight, training, and support for posts and domestic bureaus
          - Domestic excess property management 
        - Coordinate strategic planning and performance management for A/LM

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Keith Hanigan

# 				Keith Hanigan			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Office of Overseas Schools												

				September 3, 2018 -									Present							

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsState Department Official

Back to Top