alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 526.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 526.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 526.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 526.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds blocked pursuant to § 526.201 may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
HomeBureau of International Organization Affairs...Bureau of International Organization Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of International Organization Affairs Releases

169 items

        -    Report  		How the United States is Contributing to the Achievement of the Seventeen Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, 2022	   
        -    Press Statement  		The United Nations Human Rights Council Holds Special Session on Iran	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 24, 2022 
        -    Report  		Voting Practices in the United Nations, 2021	  November 23, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele Sison’s Travel to Geneva, Vienna, and Paris	  November 4, 2022 
        -    Question 1.2: Diplomatic Engagement  		Demarche Analysis Signals Need for Data Consistency Across the Department	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Germany	  November 1, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Taiwan Working Group Meeting on International Organizations	  October 28, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		United States and Japan Announce Partnership with Ghana to Support its Goal of Being the Mover in Africa for Small Modular Reactor Deployment	  October 26, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Martin Griffiths	  October 25, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with UN Secretary-General Guterres	  October 20, 2022 

previous page1…45678…17next page

Back to Top
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ANDREW CRAIG,

Appellant, 

v. 

KENNETH COLE PRODUCTIONS (LIC), INC. 

Appellee. 

____________________ 

2011-1028 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Opposition 

No. 91161781. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

MARK D. SCHNEIDER, Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, 

Anderson & Citkowski, P.C., of Troy, Michigan, argued for 

appellant. With him on the brief was ERNEST I. GIFFORD. 

CATHY E. SHORE-SIROTIN, Lackenbach Siegel, LLP, of 

Scarsdale, New York, argued for appellee. With her on 

the brief was HOWARD N. ARONSON. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000702402
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1981-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          86,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,012
<PP&E>                                      41,186,027
<DEPRECIATION>                              41,006,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,860
<SALES>                                        240,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,137
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-2055 Filed 1-27-09; 4:15 p.m.] 

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2710

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the

State of California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2710

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the State

of California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hoopa Valley Reserva5 tion South Boundary Adjustment Act’’.
2

•HR 2710 EH

1 SEC. 2. LAND TRANSFER TO RESERVATION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—All right, title, and interest of the

3 United States in and to the lands described in subsection

4 (b) shall hereafter be held in trust by the United States

5 for the benefit of the Hoopa Valley Tribe and shall be part

6 of the Hoopa Valley Reservation.

7 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in

8 subsection (a) are those portions of Townships 7 North

9 and 8 North, Ranges 5 East and 6 East, Humboldt Merid10 ian, California, within a boundary beginning at a point

11 on the current south boundary of the Hoopa Valley Indian

12 Reservation, marked and identified as ‘‘Post H.V.R. No.

13 8’’ on the Plat of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation

14 prepared from a field survey conducted by C.T. Bissel, Au15 gustus T. Smith and C.A. Robinson, Deputy Surveyors,

16 approved by the Surveyor General, H. Pratt, March 18,

17 1892, and extending from said point on a bearing of north

18 72 degrees 30 minutes east, until intersecting with a line

19 beginning at a point marked as ‘‘Post H.V.R. No. 3’’ on

20 said survey and extending on a bearing of south 15 de21 grees 59 minutes east, comprising 2,641 acres more or

22 less.

23 (c) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the

24 Six Rivers National Forest shall be adjusted to exclude

25 the lands to be held in trust for the benefit of the Hoopa

26 Valley Tribe pursuant to this section.
3

•HR 2710 EH

1 SEC. 3. SURVEY.

2 The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bu3 reau of Land Management, shall survey and monument

4 that portion of the boundary of the Hoopa Valley Reserva5 tion established by the addition of lands made by section

6 2.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
40640.

#### ANDERSON v. CHEELY.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. In an action to recover on a combination note and conditional sale contract a plea and answer setting forth that the plaintiff-vendor took possession of the automobile described in the contract about seven months prior to the filing of the plea and that so far as defendant knew the automobile was still in the possession of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff had given defendant no credit on the note sued on set forth a good defense, at least in part, as against a general demurrer. These allegations necessarily meant that one of two things was true: (1) that the plaintiff had repossessed the vehicle under the terms of the contract sued on for the purpose of selling it as agent of the defendant at its fair market value and applying the proceeds less expense of sale on the note (any excess over indebtedness going to defendant) or (2) that the plaintiff had failed to sell the vehicle within a reasonable time in which event a rescission of the contract resulted in the absence of a legal excuse for not selling the vehicle within a reasonable time. *Motor Contract Co. v. Johnson,*61 Ga. App. 735 (5) (7 SE2d 320); *Hargett v. Muscogee Bank,*32 Ga. App. 701 (3, 5) (124 SE 541); *Blevins Aircraft Corp. v. Gardner,*66 Ga. App. 843, 845 (19 SE2d 350); *Dasher v. Williams,*30 Ga. App. 122 (1) (117 SE 108); *Mock v. Waters,*6 Ga. App. 608 (3) (65 SE 579); *Dean v. Wilson,*100 Ga. App. 710 (112 SE2d *315); Ben Hyman & Co. v. Solow,*101 Ga. App. 249 (113 SE2d 489); *Ordinary v. Smith,*55 Ga. 15 (2).

2. The plea and answer did not set forth a good defense of failure of consideration and breach of implied warranty because the defendant waived these defenses by partial payments on the note sued on after notice of the alleged defects in the automobile purchased. *Securities Investment Co. v. Jett,*63 Ga. App. 384 (11 SE2d 36).

3. The plea and answer set up no defense as to the plaintiff’s obligation to refund the sum spent by the defendant in an effort to repair the automobile in view of the waiver of defects. Neither did the answer show any right in defendant to recover attorney’s fees under *Code*§ 20-1404.

4. A defendant may not contest the genuineness of the note and contract sued on while an admission that the copy thereof attached to the petition is correct remains in the answer.

*681Decided May 6, 1964.

*Joseph B. Duke, Eva L. Sloan,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. L. Dickens, Sr.,*contra.

The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the defendant’s plea and answer and in rendering judgment against the defendant.

*Judgments reversed.*

*Frankum and Parnell, JJ., concur.*
#### Michael Anthony SAUNDERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Denise MAYLE, Warden, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-55563.

D.C. No. CV-99-00075-RT.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Saunders’ request for oral argument is denied.

*885MEMORANDUM **

Michael Anthony Saunders appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for one count of second degree robbery, in violation of California Penal Code § 211, with enhancements for prior convictions and use of a weapon. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the district court’s decision to deny a habeas petition, *Wade v. Terhune,*202 F.3d 1190, 1194 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

Saunders contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because he did not understand the consequences of his plea. This contention is unavailing. “We have never held that the United States Constitution requires the State to furnish a defendant with information about parole-eligibility in order for the defendant’s plea of guilty to be voluntary ...” *See Hill v. Lockhart,*474 U.S. 52, 56, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); *see also Brady v. United States,*397 U.S. 742, 755, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) (holding that due process requires that defendant be fully aware of direct consequences of guilty plea); *Van Tran v. Lindsey,*212 F.3d 1143, 1149 (9th Cir.) (setting forth standard for relief under § 2254), *cert. denied,*531 U.S. 944, 121 S.Ct. 340, 148 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000). Moreover, based on our review of the record, we conclude that Saunders has not adequately demonstrated he was prejudiced by his plea. *See Hill,*474 U.S. at 58-59, 106 S.Ct. 366 (requiring a showing there of a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would have not pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Calvin DAMOND v. ORLEANS INDIGENT DEFENDER PROGRAM.

No. 64238.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Calvin Damond applying for remedial writ. Parish of Orleans. No 264-001.

Denied.
HomeAssisted Schools...Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

December 20, 2023

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +45-3946-3300 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: cis@cis.dk | Website: www.cis.dk| Special Needs information can be found at www.copenhageninternational.school/learning/student-support. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Copenhagen- 2024 Special Needs Profile- Denmark) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **Copenhagen International School**is an independent, coeducational day school, which offers an International Baccalaureate educational program from PYP prekindergarten (three to four-year-olds) through IB DP 2 (grade 12) for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 1963. The school year comprises four quarters, extending from mid-August through mid-June.

*This profile is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

DenmarkOffice of Overseas Schools

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 552.405 Provision of services. ( a ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 552.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, including by a foreign branch of an entity located in the United States: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201.
( b ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201.
Note 1 to § 552.405 .
*See* §§ 552.507 and 552.509 on licensing policy with regard to the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.
§ 34.203 Eligible activities for the Spill Impact Component. Activities eligible for funding under the Spill Impact Component must meet the eligibility criteria in § 34.201(a) through (k), as well as the following: ( a ) The activities must be included in and conform to the description in a State Expenditure Plan required in § 34.503 and approved by the Council. State entities may apply for a grant from the total amount allocated to that state under the Spill Impact Component before the Council has approved the State Expenditure Plan to fund eligible activities that are necessary to develop and submit that plan.
( b ) The activities included in the State Expenditure Plan must contribute to the overall economic and ecological recovery of the Gulf Coast.
( c ) Activities listed in § 34.201(a) through (g) are eligible for funding from the Spill Impact Component to the extent they are carried out in the Gulf Coast Region. For purposes of this component, an activity is carried out in the Gulf Coast Region when, in the reasonable judgment of the entity developing the State Expenditure Plan under § 34.503, each severable part of the activity is primarily designed to restore or protect that geographic area. State Expenditure Plans must include a demonstration that activities in the plan will be carried out in the Gulf Coast Region.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

I, Robert A. Berman, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rekor Systems, Inc. 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: August 14, 2019   
/s/ Robert A. Berman
   Robert A. Berman   President and Chief Executive Officer   Principal Executive Officer
 
**
HomeBiographies...Brandon Yoder

# 				Brandon Yoder			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs												

				January 29, 2024 -									Present							

Brandon P. Yoder currently serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). In this role, he oversees $2 billion in INL programs across Europe and Asia to strengthen the rule of law and combat transnational crime, corruption, cybercrime, and the trafficking of narcotics, wildlife, and natural resources.

Prior to joining the Biden Administration, Mr. Yoder served as a Senior Professional Staff Member for the Democratic staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC). During his decade of service with SFRC, he led the Committee’s efforts related to global counternarcotics and law enforcement issues, international economic policy and multilateral development banks, and the Western Hemisphere. Brandon drafted and led negotiations on multiple bipartisan laws to combat illicit fentanyl trafficking and direct U.S. policy towards Ecuador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. Previously, he served as an officer at the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), where he managed programs to advance democratic governance, human rights, and political participation. Mr. Yoder started his career in the State Department’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs.

A native of Pennsylvania, Brandon holds a M.A. from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and a B.A. from Johns Hopkins University. In 2022, he was decorated by the presidents of Colombia and Ecuador for his efforts to strengthen U.S. diplomatic relations with both countries. In 2023, Brandon was recognized by *The Hill* as on the “The 25 Staffers Who Make Capitol Hill Run.”

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top