alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                          PFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Emclaire  Financial  Corp.  (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here (the Report), I, Shelly
L. Rhoades,  Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Corporation.



/S/  SHELLY L. RHOADES
----------------------
Shelly L. Rhoades
Treasurer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


November 10, 2004


                                       24
§ 536.704 Penalty notice. ( a ) *No violation.* If, after considering any written response to the prepenalty notice and any relevant facts, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was no violation by the respondent named in the prepenalty notice, the Director promptly shall notify the respondent in writing of that determination and that no monetary penalty will be imposed.
( b ) *Violation.* If, after considering any written response to the prepenalty notice and any relevant facts, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was a violation by the respondent named in the prepenalty notice, the Director promptly shall issue a written notice of the imposition of the monetary penalty or other available disposition on the respondent.
HomeCircular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions...Mission Management

# 									Mission Management							

Circular Notes and Notices

**06/03/24:  Diplomatic Note 24-1049: Honorary Consulate License Plates Prohibited**

**11/16/21:  Notice: Cessation of Honorary Consul License Plates**

**12/01/20:  Diplomatic Note 20-1818: MFGO Temporary Suspension of Review**

**06/17/20:  Diplomatic Note 20-885: Honorary Consulate Handbook**

**03/10/20:**Diplomatic Note 20-472: Verification of Consular Posts Headed by Honorary Consular Officers

**05/24/17:**Diplomatic Note 17-783: Consulate Handbook

**07/15/15:**Diplomatic Note 15-632: Verification of Consular Posts Headed by Honorary Consular Officers

Tags

Office of Foreign Missions

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Bureau of Arms Control Verification and Compliance  Releases

# Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Releases

128 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms of the United States and the Russian Federation, February 2011 – March 2022	  March 1, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms	  March 1, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks to the Conference on Disarmament	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsFebruary 28, 2022Conference on DisarmamentGeneva, Switzerland 
        -    		International Security Advisory Board	   
        -    		Marc Shaw	  February 11, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		Joint Communique of the Non-Proliferation Treaty P5 Nations	  December 3, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks to the International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification Phase III Interim Review	  December 1, 2021International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament VerificationVirtual 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Leads International Action To Address the Aerosolized Use of Central Nervous System-acting Chemicals for Law Enforcement	  December 1, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Russia Conducts Destructive Anti-Satellite Missile Test	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 15, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Transparency in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Stockpile	  October 5, 2021 

previous page1…910111213next page

Back to Top
40664.

#### WORLEY BROTHERS GRANITE COMPANY, Inc. v. HALL.

Pannell, Judge.

Where, under the provisions of *Code*Ann. § 114-501 which require an employer to provide medical, surgical and other treatment for an employee suffering an *721accidental injury arising out of and in the course of the employment, the employer furnishes the services of a physician who begins treatment of the employee, and the employee thereafter changes physicians and treatment without the consent of the employer or the Board of Workmen’s Compensation, the employee is not entitled to an award including physician’s fees, treatment and hospitalization costs incurred under the direction of the second physician. *Hartford Acc. &c. Co. v. Sutton,*75 Ga. App. 24 (41 SE2d 915); *Owensby v. Reigel Textile Corp.,*104 Ga. App. 800 (123 SE2d 147). A different ruling is not required in the present case because the first physician was selected by the employee with the consent of the employer who followed a policy of permitting injured employees to select the physician of their choice. Such consent in the first instance is not a continuing consent so as to permit the employee to change physicians as he might see fit, but is merely a method by which the employer, in the first instance, furnishes to the employee the medical services required by law, and the selection of the physician by the employee is equivalent to the selection and the furnishing of the physician by the employer to the employee. . There being no emergency and no finding that the medical attention furnished was not adequate, that portion of the award which allowed to the claimant the physician’s fees, treatment and hospitalization costs incurred under the direction of the second physician was erroneous. The judgment of the superior court affirming the award is, therefore,

Decided May 13, 1964.

*Best, Chambers & Mabry, Richard W. Best,*for plaintiff in error.

*Joseph B. McGinty,*contra.

*Reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHNNY LEE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-01-6; CA-03-182) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 1, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition which the court construed under § 2255. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a c ircuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any di spositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





1.  In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Group Holdings, Inc. fka, Oasis Online Technologies Corp., a Minnesota company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K A/1 for the Quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Oasis Online Technologies Corp.March 13, 2012
/s/ Erik J. CooperBy:
Erik J. CooperIts:
Chairman

President

Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
its March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997   
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      1,461,639
<SECURITIES>                                  295,165         
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,130,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                7,070,953
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,816,722 
<PP&E>                                      4,204,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                651,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,369,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88,622
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,280,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,369,114
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              359,128
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              130,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               228,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            27,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                201,198 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  228,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   13.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   13.21
        

</TABLE>
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NJ 07311                | Wilmington,DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Diane Moser                    | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
§ 546.303 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 546.201(a)(1), 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 27, 2006;
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 546.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
[89 FR 15748, Mar. 5, 2024]
#### § 566.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any regulations, ruling, order, instruction, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such regulation, ruling, order, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALVARO GARCIA-JIMENEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73335

Agency No. A089-854-491

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 1, 2013** 

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Alvaro Garcia-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

FILED

AUG 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73335

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for

substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006),

and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s finding that Petitioner’s asylum

application was untimely filed, because he failed to exhaust his arguments

regarding the exceptions to the time bar. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674,

677-78 (9th Cir. 2004). 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal,

because any harm that occurred had no nexus to a protected ground. See Barrios v.

Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009); Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d

855, 858-62 (9th Cir. 2009). We lack jurisdiction to consider Petitioner’s argument

regarding successful families as a social group because he failed to exhaust that

argument. See Barron, 358 F.3d at 677-78. 

Substantial evidence supports the denial of CAT relief, because Petitioner

failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if he

returns to Mexico. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
#### Frank M. SANDERS v. CHARLES NELMS FORD, INC.

No. 52185.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 12, 1980.

Robert G. Turnage, Monticello, for appellant.

Donald B. Patterson, Brookhaven, for ap-pellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; R. I. Prichard, III, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., took no part.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7 ,

2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00617

- CV

M O HAMMAD MOMAYAZI AND SORAYA DJAVADZADAH , Appellant s

V.

MALCOLM SPILLMAN AND NATIONAL FREIGHT, IN C. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 61913



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 29, 2012. On July 16, 2012, appellant s filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Frost, McCally, and Busby.
§ 515.551 Joint bank accounts. ( a ) Specific licenses are issued unblocking a portion of or all of a joint bank account blocked by reason of the fact that one or more of the persons in whose names the account is held is a blocked national, where a non-blocked applicant claims beneficial ownership, as follows: ( 1 ) *Joint bank account, without survivorship provisions.* Specific licenses are issued unblocking only that amount with respect to which the applicant is able to prove beneficial ownership by documentary evidence independent of his assertions of interest.
( 2 ) *Joint bank account, with survivorship provisions.* Specific licenses are issued unblocking an amount equivalent to that portion of the total amount to which the applicant would be entitled if the total were divided evenly among the persons in whose names the account is held (e.g. 50 percent where there are two names; 331 ⁄ 3 percent where there are three names). Such licenses generally are issued on the basis of applicant's assertions of beneficial ownership interest without the requirement of independent evidence.
( 3 ) *Joint bank account in the names of a husband and wife, with survivorship provision.* Specific licenses are issued unblocking portions of such accounts blocked by reason of the residence of one spouse in Cuba in favor of the non-blocked spouse under the policy stated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. However, if 50 percent of the account has been unblocked under that policy, and the spouse who is the blocked Cuban national subsequently dies, the surviving spouse may be entitled to a license unblocking the remainder of the assets under § 515.522.
( b ) [Reserved]
[39 FR 25318, July 10, 1974, as amended at 49 FR 27145, July 2, 1984; 54 FR 5234, Feb. 2, 1989; 64 FR 25813, May 13, 1999]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20636]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Closed Meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 23 and 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
September 23 and 24, 2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., 
Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Carolan, C:AP:ART, 1099 14th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on September 23 
and 24, 2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court 
Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that 
the meeting will not be open to the public.

Kurt Meier,
Deputy Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. E9-20636 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### TRI-STATE MACHINERY, INC. v. JOHN MYERS PUMP SERVICE, INC., and Jerry H. Wolff. TRI-STATE MACHINERY, INC. v. Jerry H. WOLFF and Bobby Frank McDanell, d/b/a McDanell Dirt & Hauling Contracting.

No. 64247.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re Tri-State Machinery, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Ouachita. Nos. 13781 and 13782.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

I, Lindsay Corby, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) of Byline Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”); and 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.

 

 

 

| Date: April 30, 2018 |   | /s/ Lindsay Corby                                    |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Lindsay Corby                                        |
|                 |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                 |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |