alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC. 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 This Amendment No. 3 to the
Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is effective as of June 20, 2012. 

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Stewart Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) approved an
amendment to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) revising the Plan’s vesting provisions at its meeting on June 20, 2012. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective June 20, 2012, as follows: 

I. 

Article 3, Paragraph 7 Earliest Retirement Date, is amended to add a new paragraph to the end of the paragraph, as follows:

 For Participants terminating employment with the Company on or after June 20, 2012, Earliest
Retirement Date means, for a Class B Participant, the Participant’s completion of seven years of employment with the Employer. For Class A Participants, Earliest Retirement Date means the Participant’s 55th birthday, regardless of the Participant’s termination date.

 II. 
 Article 5, Paragraph 1, is restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
 1. A
Class A or Class B Participant whose Termination of Employment occurs on or after his Earliest Retirement Date is entitled to an Early Retirement Benefit, commencing at the Participant’s Annuity Starting Date. The Early Retirement Benefit
shall be determined in the same manner as a Normal Retirement Benefit, reduced, however, by 5% for each full year (and 1/26 of 5% for each full two-week pay period of a partial year) that the Termination of Employment precedes the Normal Retirement
Date, but not below 10% of Final Average Pay. As a result, the percentage of Final Average Pay that will be paid to a Class A or Class B Participant whose Termination of Employment occurs on his birthday is as follows: 








					
	 Age
	 	 Class A
	 	 Class B

	 50
	 	N/A	 	10.0%
	 50
	 	N/A	 	10.0%
	 51
	 	N/A	 	12.0%
	 52
	 	N/A	 	14.0%
	 53
	 	N/A	 	16.0%
	 54
	 	N/A	 	18.0%
	 55
	 	25.0%	 	20.0%
	 56
	 	27.5%	 	22.0%
	 57
	 	30.0%	 	24.0%
	 58
	 	32.5%	 	26.0%
	 59
	 	35.0%	 	28.0%
	 60
	 	37.5%	 	30.0%
	 61
	 	40.0%	 	32.0%
	 62
	 	42.5%	 	34.0%
	 63
	 	45.0%	 	36.0%
	 64
	 	47.5%	 	38.0%
	 65
	 	50.0%	 	40.0%

 Executed in Jefferson, Louisiana, this 31st day of July, 2012. 

 

							
	WITNESSES:	 	STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
			
	 /s/ Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas M. Kitchen

		 		 	Thomas M. Kitchen
	Print Name:	 	 Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.
	 		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
			
	 /s/ Lisa T. Winningkoff
	 		 	
				
	Print Name:	 	 Lisa T. Winningkoff
#### § 50.114 Data call authority.

For the purpose of determining initial or recalculated PRLPs, Treasury may issue a data call to insurers for insured loss information, seeking information in addition to any information provided to Treasury under subparts F and H of this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2685 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2685

        To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 1995

  Mr. Thomas (for himself and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 
addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVERAGE DATA BANK.

    (a) In General.--Section 1144 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1320b-14), as added by section 13581(a) of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (in this section referred to as ``OBRA-
93''), is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Medicare.--Section 1862(b)(5) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395y(b)(5)), as amended by section 13581(b)(1) of OBRA-93, is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the dash and 
                all that follows through the end and inserting 
                ``subparagraph (A) for purposes of carrying out this 
                subsection.'', and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking 
                ``subparagraph (B)(i)'' and inserting ``subparagraph 
                (B)''.
            (2) Medicaid.--Section 1902(a)(25)(A)(i) of such Act (42 
        U.S.C. 1396a(a)(25)(A)(i)), as amended by section 13581(b)(2) 
        of OBRA-93, is amended by striking ``including the use of'' and 
        all that follows through ``any additional measures''.
            (3) Data matches.--Section 552a(a)(8)(B) of title 5, United 
        States Code, as amended by section 13581(c) of OBRA-93, is 
        amended--
                    (A) by adding ``or'' at the end of clause (v),
                    (B) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (vi), 
                and
                    (C) by striking clause (vii).
                                 <all>
```
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(04)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(04)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

CAREER PROFILE SUPPLEMENT -

CIVIL ENGINEERING

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
114 STAT. 1450 PUBLIC LAW 106–381—OCT. 27, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 117:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 27, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–381

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘October 28, 2000’’.

Approved October 27, 2000.

Ante, pp. 810,

866, 1073, 1318,

1397, 1398.

Oct. 27, 2000

[H.J. Res. 117]
#### § 560.551 Student loan payments from persons in Iran authorized.

United States depository institutions and private loan companies are authorized to engage in all transactions necessary to collect, accept, and process student loan payments from persons in Iran or ordinarily resident in Iran.
[ec rusthamsenbshodrrenerdaeediegneiasahivdsaueeanlivaienianan
oe won om te

Vemma Traneowe Aarconr Cnt Trew fh FRED! Mowe Bat || ote chew te Poe
—

Lonaion fe aterm: san

Nene aes
tote ——— here

—___—_——.
daha Winsdogion, OC,

US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
RATIONAL OCEANIC and) ATMCUEHERE ADMINISTRATION
MATIONA, OCTAMG SINCE

teen
LATAITOAETING CONTINUE INTER TALE 0 METIAS TD MANnnuie DEPT,
‘UVP Ei TES AY 2 AMEE UTES

Leathe stbate iW LOW watt

5 Some hasan
#### § 550.317 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money services businesses, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2543

Bridget Nicole Walters,

Petitioner

v.

Attorney General of the United States

( Agency No. A201

- 242

- 287 )

Present: AMBRO, HARDIMAN and PHIPPS

, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The opinion filed on September 23, 2021 is hereby amended to correct the spelling

of Petitioner’s first name in the case title listing on page 1 and to remove the bold citation

on page 2 of the Concurring/Dissenting Opinion.

As these corrections are not subst antive, the filing date of the judgment will not be

altered.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro

Circuit Judge

Dated: O ctober 4, 2021
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Sierra Leone Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Sierra Leone Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges:******In Sierra Leone, drug trafficking and money laundering remain prevalentat alarming levels, with the country being used as a transshipment point from South America/Asia to Europe and, to a lesser extent, the United States. Corruption is a pervasive problem in Sierra Leone that compromises citizen access to basic public services and institutions such as health, education, and the police. The criminal justice system is inefficient and backlogged, with remand inmates spending years incarcerated. 

**Goals:******In Sierra Leone, INL aims to disrupt transnational organized crime, improve bilateral law enforcement cooperation, support justice sector development, and improve security and human rights conditions in prisons.  

**Accomplishments:******

From 2015-2020, INL’s key projects have included:
        - Training  Sierra Leone Police  on how to effectively manage public order situations by promoting and implementing a national decision-making model. This training was instrumental in a March 2018 presidential election cycle uncharacteristically marked by very few instances of election-related violence despite many large political gatherings and a vigorous contest. 
        - Standing up, operationalizing, and strengthening the Transnational Organized Crime Unit which is now making arrests, seizing illicit drugs and other contraband, investigating serious criminal cases, and supporting successful prosecutions. 
        - Implementing a  project to promote transparency among the  j udiciary. The project developed and finalized  b ail  r egulations , which were  implemented across jurisdictions throughout the country  in 2018 . It also developed and rolled out the use of a “Justice App” for judges and magistrates to track cases and manage workload.  
        - Improving Sierra Leone  Correctional Services ’  (SLCS)  institution al policies through a reform a genda entitled:  “From Prisons to Corrections: Promoting Institutional Reform of the Sierra Leone Correctional Services . ”  The project has  recruited  human resources  professionals , strengthened security protocols, renovated 8 of 17 prison facilities, improved human rights conditions to better align with Mandela Rules and Bangkok Rules, expanded inmate programs and industries, implemented prison courts to address the remand population, and more.  

Tags

Sierra Leone

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Belize Independence Day

# 									Belize Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 21, 2021

On behalf of the Government and people of the United States of America, I extend my warmest congratulations to the people of Belize on the momentous occasion of the 40th anniversary of your independence.

The United States joins the people of Belize in celebrating the accomplishments your country has achieved over the past four decades of independence.  Our nations are bound by a strong friendship and partnership, safeguarded by our mutual commitment to democracy, security, and joint prosperity.  We continue to stand with Belize in facing shared challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, transnational organized crime, and the climate crisis.

As you celebrate your 40th Independence Day, may the bond between our nations continue to be an example of what is possible through partnership between vibrant democracies with shared values and common goals.

Tags

BelizeBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Diplomatic Technology...Bureau of Information Resource Management  Releases

# Bureau of Diplomatic Technology Releases

27 items

        -    		Department Vulnerability Disclosure Intake Form	   
        -    		Bureau of Diplomatic Technology	  January 20, 2021 
        -    		Initiatives	   
        -    		Directorates	   
        -    		U.S. Department of State Information Technology Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2019 – 2022	  March 7, 2019 
        -    		Strategic Plan	   
        -    		Al Bowden	  June 1, 2016 

previous page123

Back to Top
#### David Wolf, Appellant, v Chastity Paxton-Farmer, Defendant, and 486 Elmwood Avenue, Inc., Doing Business as Faherty's, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 468]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John P Lane, J.), entered March 24, 2004. The order granted the motion of defendant 486 Elmwood Avenue, Inc., doing business as Faherty’s, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the fourth cause of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained in an incident at a bar owned and operated by defendant 486 Elmwood Avenue, Inc., doing business as Faherty’s (Faherty’s). Plaintiff, a patron of Faherty’s, was struck in the face with a glass by another patron, defendant Chastity Paxton-Farmer. Supreme Court properly granted that part of Faherty’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Dram Shop Act cause of action *(see*General Obligations Law § 11-101; *see also*Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 [2]). “The record is devoid of any evidence that [Paxton-Farmer] was visibly intoxicated” prior to the incident *(Kelly v Fleet Bank,*271 AD2d 654, 655 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 702 [2001]), and the only evidence in the record with respect to her alcohol consumption at Faherty’s is that she drank one full mixed drink and part of a second. Neither that evidence nor the conflicting evidence with respect to the length of time during which Paxton-Farmer was at Faherty’s is sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat that part of Faherty’s motion with respect to the Dram Shop Act cause of action *(see Pizzaro v City of New York,*188 AD2d 591, 594 [1992], *lv denied*82 NY2d 656 [1993]).

*1047The court erred, however, in granting that part of Faherty’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action alleging negligence, and thus we modify the order accordingly. “Innkeepers have a duty to exercise reasonable care in protecting patrons from injury arising from reasonably anticipated causes” *(Cittadino v DeGironimo,*198 AD2d 801, 802 [1993]). Faherty’s failed to establish as a matter of law that the incident was extraordinary or one that could not reasonably be anticipated or prevented *(cf. Williams v TeDave Enters.,*242 AD2d 861 [1997]). Rather, Faherty’s own proof raises triable “issues of fact with respect to ‘the length and intensity of the altercation before plaintiff sustained [his] injury’ . . . and the reasonableness of [Faherty’s] response thereto” *(Jayes v Storms,*12 AD3d 1090, 1091 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0135

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.M.M.R. and M.L.R.M.R.,

 Youths in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

On June 25, 2021, counsel for Appellant Mother filed a motion for a 45-day

extension of time within which to file her opening brief. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is for extension of time is GRANTED. 

Appellants Mother’s opening brief shall be filed on or before September 2, 2021. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 7 2021

07/07/2021
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
53 CAF 11-01683 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THOR C.

--------------------------------------- CATTARAUGUS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL ORDER SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; RONNIE C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. STEPHEN J. RILEY, OLEAN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. SCHAVON R. MORGAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MACHIAS, FOR THOR C.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, J.), entered July 7, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 549.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a person, such property shall no longer be deemed to be property blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a), unless there exists in the property another interest that is blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a) or any other part of this chapter, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a), such property shall be deemed to be property in which that person has an interest and therefore blocked.
#### § 406.2 Custody of seized gold valued not in excess of $2,500.

Any gold, the value of which does not exceed $2,500, seized by officers of the Secret Service pursuant to the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 and the Gold Regulations, if not needed as evidence or for further investigation by the Secret Service, shall be placed forthwith by the seizing officer in the custody of the district director of customs for the customs district in which such seizure is made. Such gold shall be accompanied by a report from the Secret Service showing the basis of the seizure and a citation to each of the statutes and sections of the Gold Regulations violated.
HomeOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice...Office of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice  Releases

# Office of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Releases

38 items

        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Desirée Cormier Smith’s Trip to Geneva  for Historic Launch of the UN Permanent Forum for People of African Descent	  December 3, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		United States Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Desirée Cormier Smith Visits Mexico	  November 27, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		SRREJ Cormier Smith Opening Remarks Film Screening “Who We Are: A Chronicle of Racism in America”	  Desirée Cormier SmithNovember 17, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		SRREJ Cormier Smith Press Remarks International Day for People of African Descent Foreign Press Center	  Desirée Cormier SmithAugust 31, 2022 
        -    U.S. Mission Release  		Opening Statement by Desirée Cormier Smith	  August 11, 2022 
        -    U.S. Embassy Release  		This U.S. Diplomat Fights Systemic Racism Worldwide	  August 9, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Delegation to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination	  August 9, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Appointment of Desirée Cormier Smith as the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice	  June 17, 2022 

previous page1234

Back to Top
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Digna Jimenez, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 43]

Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County (John N. Byrne, J, at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered May 20, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the May 15, 2003 effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]) providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Since this issue involves the substantive legality of the sentence, it survives defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams and Malone, JJ.
HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...the United States Presidents Emergency Plan for Aids Relief  Releases

# The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Releases

99 items

        -    Report  		PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) Indicators	   
        -    		PEPFAR at the 76th Session of the U.N. General Assembly	  September 20, 2021 
        -    		Development of the Next PEPFAR Strategy: Vision 2025	   
        -    DipNote: Global Health  		PEPFAR: Accelerating Progress to End AIDS in the Age of COVID-19	  Angeli AchrekarJuly 16, 2021 
        -    Video Remarks  		UN High Level Meeting on HIV/AIDS	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 10, 2021Recorded on June 4, 2021 
        -    		Forty Years of HIV	  June 5, 2021 
        -    		PEPFAR COP/ROP 2021 Planning Process	  April 2, 2021 
        -    Video Remarks  		Secretary Blinken’s Remarks at the Opening of the PEPFAR 2021 Planning Meeting	  April 1, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Challenge for Change to Assist Girls and Young Women	  Angeli AchrekarMarch 8, 2021 
        -    		PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2021 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) Indicators	   

previous page1…678910next page

Back to Top