alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 547.513 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates for personal, non-commercial use. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities are: ( i ) Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* For the purposes of this section, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* For the purposes of this section, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 547.513 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78489, Dec. 21, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

December 15, 2023

1210056

City of Orange Beach v. Ian Boles. (Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court: 

CV-17-900361).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the ruling on the application for rehearing filed in this 

case and indicated below was entered in this cause on December 15, 2023:

Application Overruled. No Opinion. Shaw, J. -- Parker, C.J., 

and Mendheim and Stewart, JJ., concur. Wise, Bryan, and Sellers, JJ., 

dissent. Mitchell and Cook, JJ., recuse themselves.

WHEREAS, the appeal in the above referenced cause has been duly 

submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the 

judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on June 16, 2023:

REVERSED AND REMANDED. Shaw, J. -- Stewart, J., concurs. 

Shaw, J., concurs specially, with opinion, which Mendheim, J., joins. 

Parker, C.J., concurs in the result, with opinion. Sellers, J., dissents, with 

opinion, which Wise and Bryan, JJ., join. Mitchell and Cook, JJ., recuse 

themselves..

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Docket No. FAA-2011-1324

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/12/11

Regional Airline Association Connie

Arnold

5/12/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/12/11

ATA Joe White 5/12/11
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2694

To provide that it shall be a Federal crime to misappropriate a person’s

name in connection with lobbying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 30, 1995

Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. MCINNIS, and

Mr. SALMON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that it shall be a Federal crime to misappropriate

a person’s name in connection with lobbying.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MISAPPROPRIATION OF A NAME.

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 47 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘§ 1035. Misappropriation of person’s name in con8 nection with lobbying contact

9 ‘‘Whoever falsely uses or employs the name of any

10 person, or causes such name to be falsely used or em-
2

•HR 2694 IH

1 ployed, in any telegram, letter, other printed or written

2 matter, or electronic communication intended or designed

3 to influence in any manner a Member of Congress to favor

4 or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation before the

5 Congress or any nomination pending before the Senate,

6 whether before or after the introduction of such legislation

7 or the submission of such nomination, for the purpose of

8 conveying the impression that such person authorized such

9 use or employment of the person’s name shall be fined

10 under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year,

11 or both.’’.

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec13 tions for such chapter 47 is amended by adding at the

14 end the following:

‘‘1035. Misappropriation of person’s name in connection with lobbying contact.’’.

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect 30 days after the

17 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
HomeBiographies...Jonathan Moore

# 				Jonathan Moore			

															Coordinator of the Health Incident Response Task Force												

				November 15, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

State Department Official

Back to Top
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Kevin Akeroyd, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cision Ltd.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: April 5, 2019 |                        
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    |                        
|                    | /s/ Kevin Akeroyd      
|                    | Kevin Akeroyd          
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 401.1 Secret Service agents authorized to make seizures.

All officers of the U.S. Secret Service engaged in the enforcement of counterfeiting laws are hereby authorized and designated to seize such vessels, vehicles, and aircraft as may be subject to seizure because of violations of the said act of August 9, 1939, pertaining to contraband articles referred to in section 1(b) (3) of said act.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. GILB ER TO LOPEZ-R OM O, a .k.a
. R om e ro Gilbe rto Lope z ,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt, Nos. 16-50219

16-50220 D.C . Nos. 3:13-c r-03504-L 3:16-cr-00140-L
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia M . Ja m e s Lore nz , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d April 11, 2017 ** B e fore : GOULD, C LIFTON, a nd HUR W ITZ, C i rc uit Judge s. In the se c onsolida

te d a ppe a ls, Gilbe rto Lope z -R om o c h a lle nge s the 18-
m onth se nte nc e im

pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a

re m ove d
a lie n found in the

Unite d Stat e s, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326, a nd the 12-m onth 

# F IL ED APR 18 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* T his d isposition is not a

ppropria te for public ation and is n ot pre c e d e nt e xc e pt a s provide d by

Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa ne l una nim ously c onc lud es t h is cas e is suita ble for de c i sion without ora l argum e nt. S

e eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c onse c utive se nte nc e im p ose d following re voc ation of supervise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm
. Lope z -R om o c o nte n ds tha t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by fa iling to
a de quate ly

a ddre ss his mitiga

ting a rgum e nts in fa

vor of lowe r se nte nc e s for his ille g a l re e ntry

c onvic tion a

nd viola tion of supervise d re l e a se . The distric t c o urt did not pla inly

e rr. Se eUnite d State

s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010). The re c ord de m onstra te s tha t the distric t c ourt liste n e d to Lope z R om o’ s argum e nts, ide ntifie d wha t the c o urt be l ie ve d

to be the only

le gitim ate
m itiga ting fa c tor, a

n d we ighe d tha

t fa c tor a ga inst a ggravating fa c tors be fore im posing thewithin-Guide line s se nte nc e s in both c a se s. The distric t c ourt’ s e xpla nation wa s suffic ie nt. Se eUnite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba

nc ). Lope z -R om o ne xt a

rgue s tha t the distric t c ourt im

pe rm issibly

ba se d the
re voc ation se nte nc e on the ne e d to punish his unde rly ing c rim ina l c onduc t. The
re c o rd doe s not support Lope z -R om o’ s argum e nt, a nd inste a d, de m onstra

te s tha t the d istric t c o urt pe rm issibly ba se d the se nte nc e on Lope z -R om o’ s bre a c h of the
c ourt’ s trust, his history

and c ha ra c te ristic s, a

nd the ne e d for de te rre nc e . Se e18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ); Unite d State s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th C ir. 2007). AFFIRM E D.
16
- 5 02 1 9 & 1 6
- 5 0 2 2 0 2
§ 407.12 Vehicular and pedestrian traffic. ( a ) Drivers of all vehicles in or on the property shall drive in a careful and safe manner at all times and shall comply with the signals and directions of Treasury guards and all posted traffic signs.
( b ) The blocking of entrances, driveways, walks, loading platforms, or fire hydrants in or on the property is prohibited.
( c ) Parking in or on the property is not allowed without a permit or specific authority. Parking without authority, parking in unauthorized locations, or in locations reserved for other persons, or contrary to the directions of Treasury guards or posted signs is prohibited.
( d ) This section may be supplemented from time to time with the approval of the Assistant Secretary for Administration, or his delegate, by the issuance and posting of specific traffic directives as may be required and when so issued and posted such directives shall have the same force and effect as if made a part hereof.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0135

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: A.M.M.R. and M.L.R.M.R.,

Youths in Need of Care. O R D E R

_________________ On June 25, 2021, c ounsel for Appellant Mother filed a motion for a 45 - day extension of time within which to file her opening brief. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant s Mother’s opening brief shall be filed on or before September 2 , 202 1 . No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 7 2021

07/07/2021
§ 558.205 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
HomeBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations...Overseas Buildings Operations  Releases

# Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Releases

54 items

        -    Media Note  		Announcing the Winners of the 2023 Department of Energy Federal Energy and Water Management Awards	  March 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Celebrates the Groundbreaking of the New U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia	  December 12, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The Department of State Celebrates the Ribbon Cutting of the New U.S. Embassy in Windhoek, Namibia	  December 7, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Art in Embassies Launches New Events in Celebration of 60th Anniversary	  September 14, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Department of State Begins Construction on New U.S. Embassy in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo	  August 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Celebrates the Dedication of the New U.S. Embassy in Asunción, Paraguay	  June 29, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Department of State Dedicates New U.S. Consulate General in Hyderabad, India	  June 2, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Department of State Celebrates Groundbreaking of New U.S. Embassy in Port Louis, Mauritius	  May 30, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The Department of State Celebrates the Groundbreaking of the New U.S. Embassy in Brasília, Brazil	  May 26, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Democracy Collection Launches Traveling Exhibition: “A More Perfect Union: American Artists and the Currents of our Time”	  May 18, 2023 

123…6next page

Back to Top
#### Audley Bedford HARRIS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 52898.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 18, 1981.

Lester C. Franklin, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Robert T. Mills, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
(logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2016 byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asCertificate Administrator and Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services, LLC asOperating Advisor Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the Morgan StanleyCapital I Trust 2016-UBS12, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates,Series 2016-UBS12

**(MCSI 2016-UBS12)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein ce1tifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2017 toDecember 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein. 

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2018
#### § 50.5 Rule of construction for dates.

Unless otherwise expressly provided in the regulation, any date in these regulations is intended to be applied so that the day begins at 12:01 a.m. and ends at midnight on that date.
# Bureau of International Organization Affairs Releases

167 items

        -    		78th Session United Nations General Assembly	   
        -    Media Note  		Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services	  August 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken After the UN Security Council Open Debate on Famine and Conflict-Induced Global Food Insecurity	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 3, 2023United Nations HeadquartersNew York City, New York 
        -    Question 1.2: Diplomatic Engagement  		How Does U.S. Multilateral Diplomacy Advance Fentanyl-related U.S. Priorities to Benefit the American People?	   
        -    Fact Sheet  		Outcomes of the 53rd Session of the UN Human Rights Council	  July 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Appointment of Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles as Head of the U.S. Mission to UNESCO	  July 17, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Kenya, Tanzania, Nigeria, South Africa, Egypt, Tunisia, and Türkiye	  July 10, 2023 
        -    		Brian M. Grimm	  May 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The Election of Amy E. Pope as Director General of the International Organization for Migration	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support of Amy E. Pope’s Campaign for Director General of the International Organization for Migration	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 10, 2023 

previous page12345…17next page

Back to Top
§ 542.530 Transactions incident to importations from Syria authorized. All transactions otherwise prohibited by § 542.207 that are ordinarily incident to an importation into the United States from Syria, directly or indirectly, of goods technology, or services, are authorized, provided the importation is not from or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201. Note to § 542.530 :
This section does not authorize transactions that are ordinarily incident to an importation that is prohibited pursuant to 542.208 or any transaction prohibited pursuant to 542.209.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Antigua and Barbuda National Day

# 									Antigua and Barbuda National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 1, 2022

I would like to extend my congratulations to the government and people of Antigua and Barbuda on their 41st year of independence.

We thank Antigua and Barbuda for its close cooperation with the United States on regional security issues, to include countering narcotrafficking and reducing the flow of illicit arms. Our mutual legal assistance treaty has benefitted both of our countries, and we hope to continue working together to prevent crime before it happens, by increasing educational, economic and social opportunities for at-risk youth.

Antigua and Barbuda is on the front line of the climate crisis, and the United States is committed to elevating our cooperation to support climate adaptation and resilience and strengthen energy security with the urgency these challenges demand, through the U.S.-Caribbean Partnership to Address the Climate Crisis 2030 (PACC 2030).

I wish the people of Antigua and Barbuda a happy Independence Day and a prosperous year ahead.

Tags

Antigua and BarbudaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsClimate ChangeEnergyOffice of the SpokespersonRegional IssuesThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 550.315 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

October 27, 2006

Ms. Kathleen Marie Kennedy

Benckenstein, Norvell & Nathan, L.L.P.

P.O. Box 551

Beaumont, TX 77704-0551

Ms. Debra Ibarra Mayfield

Rymer Moore Jackson & Echols, P.C.

2801 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 250

Houston, TX 77056

RE:Case Number:  06-0201

Court of Appeals Number:  12-05-00111-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-328

Style:MARGARET PARKER AND JIMMY HARVILLE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF SIDNEY HARVILLE, A MINOR

v.

SHANNAN WEAVER BAREFIELD AND CHAMPION EMS

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court and issued the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0201Page 1**
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 2710

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the State

of California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hoopa Valley Reserva5 tion South Boundary Adjustment Act’’.
2

•HR 2710 RFS

1 SEC. 2. LAND TRANSFER TO RESERVATION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—All right, title, and interest of the

3 United States in and to the lands described in subsection

4 (b) shall hereafter be held in trust by the United States

5 for the benefit of the Hoopa Valley Tribe and shall be part

6 of the Hoopa Valley Reservation.

7 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in

8 subsection (a) are those portions of Townships 7 North

9 and 8 North, Ranges 5 East and 6 East, Humboldt Merid10 ian, California, within a boundary beginning at a point

11 on the current south boundary of the Hoopa Valley Indian

12 Reservation, marked and identified as ‘‘Post H.V.R. No.

13 8’’ on the Plat of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation

14 prepared from a field survey conducted by C.T. Bissel, Au15 gustus T. Smith and C.A. Robinson, Deputy Surveyors,

16 approved by the Surveyor General, H. Pratt, March 18,

17 1892, and extending from said point on a bearing of north

18 72 degrees 30 minutes east, until intersecting with a line

19 beginning at a point marked as ‘‘Post H.V.R. No. 3’’ on

20 said survey and extending on a bearing of south 15 de21 grees 59 minutes east, comprising 2,641 acres more or

22 less.

23 (c) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the

24 Six Rivers National Forest shall be adjusted to exclude

25 the lands to be held in trust for the benefit of the Hoopa

26 Valley Tribe pursuant to this section.
3

•HR 2710 RFS

1 SEC. 3. SURVEY.

2 The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bu3 reau of Land Management, shall survey and monument

4 that portion of the boundary of the Hoopa Valley Reserva5 tion established by the addition of lands made by section

6 2.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
# Bureau of African Affairs Releases

2676 items

        -    Report  		Cameroon	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cabo Verde	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Burundi	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Burkina Faso	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Botswana	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Benin	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Togo	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1…253254255256257…268next page

Back to Top