alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 17

- 3700

______ TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC

v.

PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 7.053 ACRES,

PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT

FOR 1.709 ACRES AND TEMPORARY

EASEMENTS FOR 8.551 ACRES IN MILFORD

AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY,

PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS;

KING ARTHUR ESTATES, A Limited Partnership;

RIOTHAMUS CORP, General Partner of King Estates

c/o Ernest Bertuzzi P resident; ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS

AND INTERESTED PARTIES

King Arthur Estates, L.P. and Riothamus Corporation,

Appellants

______________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTR ICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE

DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. No. 3

- 12

- cv

- 01477)

District Judge: Hon. A. Richard Caputo

______________

O RDER AMENDING O PINION

______________

It appears that certain references to the majority contained within the dissenting opinion

did not identify the correct page number. Accordingly, the dissenting opinion is amended

as follows:

Page 4, footnote 2, change “Maj. Op. 21” to “Maj. Op. 21

- 22”;Page 7, first full paragraph, fifth line, change “Maj. Op. 17

- 18” to “M aj. Op. 18”;

Page 7, footnote 4, change “Maj. Op. 19

- 21” to “Maj. Op. 20

- 21”; and,

Page 8, second line, change “Maj. Op. 18” to “Maj. Op. 19”.

For the Court,

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Date: July 25, 2019

cc: Albert F. Moran, Esq.

Patrick F. Nugent, Esq.

Sean T. O'Neill, Esq.

John F. Stoviak, Esq.

Elizabeth U. Witmer, Esq.
#### § 542.309 Information and communications technology.

The term *information and communications technology* means any hardware, software, or other product or service primarily intended to fulfill or enable the function of information processing and communication by electronic means, including transmission and display, including via the Internet.

[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014. Redesignated at 89 FR 48317, June 6, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.21 Payment to judgment creditors.

(a) *Purchaser or officer under levy.* The Department of the Treasury will pay (but not reissue) a savings bond to the purchaser at a sale under a levy or to the officer authorized under appropriate process to levy upon property of the registered owner or coowner to satisfy a money judgment. Payment will be made only to the extent necessary to satisfy the money judgment. The amount paid is limited to the redemption value 60 days after the termination of the judicial proceedings. Except in a case of a levy by the Internal Revenue Service, payment of a bond registered in coownership form pursuant to a judgment or a levy against only one coowner is limited to the extent of that coowner's interest in the bond. That interest must be established by an agreement between the coowners by judgment, decree, or order of a court in a proceeding to which both coowners are parties. Payment of a bond registered in coownership form pursuant to levy by the Internal Revenue Service will be made if the levy is against either coowner on the bond.

(b) *Trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, or similar court officer.* The Department of the Treasury will pay, at current redemption value, a savings bond to a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver of an insolvent's estate, a receiver in equity, or a similar court officer under the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.

[44 FR 76441, Dec. 26, 1979, as amended at 63 FR 64551, Nov. 20, 1998]
Sanitized

Process Flow

Diagram
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *INTERNAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                       2,229,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,012,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,184,000
<INVENTORY>                                 17,415,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,110,981
<PP&E>                                       4,126,623
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,182,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,071,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,174,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,250
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,007,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,071,883
<SALES>                                     46,048,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,048,939
<CGS>                                       30,269,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,269,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             750,309    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,076,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   355,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (721,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (721,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2704

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

A bill to provide that the United States Post Office building

that is to be located at 7436 South Exchange Avenue,

Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Charles A. Hayes Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2704 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building that is to be

3 located at 7436 South Exchange Avenue, Chicago, Illinois,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Charles A. Hayes

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles A. Hayes Post

11 Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
#### § 548.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### §§ 351.66-351.67 [Reserved]
PUBLIC LAW 110–310—AUG. 12, 2008 122 STAT. 3011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6150: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

June 17, 18, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–310 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14500 

Lorain Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ‘‘John P. Gallagher Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN P. GALLAGHER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 14500 Lorain Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘John P. Gallagher Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John P. Gallagher Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 12, 2008. 

Aug. 12, 2008 

[H.R. 6150] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.59 What is a payroll savings plan?

A payroll savings plan is an automatic method of purchasing savings bonds. (See the definition in § 363.6.) You may open your payroll savings plan by selecting an amount, series, and registration for your savings bond purchases using functionality in your TreasuryDirect® account. Each bond purchase must be in a minimum amount of $25 with additional one-cent increments above that amount, up to a maximum amount of $5000, in any one transaction. The series may be either a Series EE or Series I savings bond. The registration may be any authorized form of registration for an electronic savings bond. You must also initiate a request to your employer or your financial institution to send credits on a recurring basis to your payroll savings plan through the ACH method to purchase a payroll zero-percent certificate of indebtedness. (See Subpart D for more information about a payroll zero-percent certificate of indebtedness.) When you have accumulated a sufficient amount of payroll zero-percent certificate of indebtedness to purchase a savings bond in the amount, series, and registration that you selected, the TreasuryDirect® system will automatically redeem your payroll zero-percent certificate of indebtedness and purchase your selected savings bond.

[75 FR 70816, Nov. 19, 2010]
#### § 558.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 558.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 558.201.
#### § 549.312 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
#### Eva La Mire *vs.*Earl Houghton.

First Judicial District, Hartford,

May Term, 1926.

Wheeler, C. J., Curtis, Maltbie, Haines and Hinman, Js.

Argued May 4th

decided May 29th, 1926.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged -to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford *743County and tried to the court, *Brown, J.;*judgment rendered for defendant, and appeal by plaintiff.

*No error.*

*Edward H. Kelly,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*A. Storrs Campbell,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff attempted to corrrect the finding by the method provided in General Statutes, §§ 5829, 5830 and 5831; thereafter she abandoned this method for the method provided in General Statutes, § 5832. She has not pursued either method in accordance with our practice. Rules of Supreme Court of Errors, Practice Book, p. 309, § 11, and Form 3, page 313. For these reasons her assignments of error as to corrections claimed in the finding must be disregarded.

Errors predicated upon the failure of the subordinate facts to support the court’s conclusions that none of the acts of negligence on the part of the defendant as alleged have been established are very plainly without merit. The subordinate facts do support the conclusions reached by the trial court.

There is no error.
#### Michael Coyne, Respondent, *against*The New York Longshoremen’s Protective Association, No. 3, Appellant.

(Decided January 21st, 1884)

In an action by a member of an incorporated benevolent association to recover from the association money claimed by him as a benefit upon the death of his wife, it appeared that, under the by-laws of the association, a member in arrear for dues for more than three months was not entitled to such benefits; and the official record of the association and the testimony of one of its officers, who alone was authorized to receive payment of dues, showed plaintiff to have been in arrear more than four months at the time of his wife’s death. *Held,*that this evidence was not overcome by testimony of plaintiff to the contrary, from his memory, he having lost his book containing entries of payments; and that subsequent payment of his dues, and their receipt by the association, did not re-instate his right to the benefit in question.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court in the City of New York for the First Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*J. D.*McClelland, for appellant.

*2
      *D. Finn,*for respondent.

Beach, J.

The official record and the testimony of the financial secretary, who alone was authorized to receive payment of dues, clearly shows the plaintiff to have been in arrear over four months at the date of his wife’s death. This cannot be overcome by the plaintiff’s-loose statements from memory, he having lost his book containing entries of payments. Being at the time in arrear over three months, he was not entitled to the fifty dollars benefit.

Subsequent payment of Ms dues, and their -receipt by the association, could not re-instate the plaintiff’s right to the fifty dollars. The defendant was under no legal obligation to pay the benefit when his wife died, and could incur none by thereafter accepting dues, which the plaintiff as a member was bound to pay, and the society to receive.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Charles P. Daly,- Ch. J., and LarLemore, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Order issued October 16, 2012



### In The
No. 05-10-00126-CV 

### MEENAKSHI S. PRABHAKAR, M.D. AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE DOCTORS, P.A., Appellants/Cross-Appellees

Ve 

### DAVID FRITZGERALD, Appellee/Cross-Appellant On Appeal from the 160th District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05-08507-H



### ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to abate the parties’ cross appeals to permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the parties’ settlement agreement. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 (a)(2)(C), we ABATE the appeal effective October 16, 2012. The appeal will be reinstated upon the filing of a joint motion by the parties to reinstate or on November 30, 2012, whichever comes first.
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Test Procedure Proposed Rulemaking: Public Meeting and Webinar 422040640

Actual Start Date/Time Dec 05, 2013 08:11 AM EST Total Attended 25 

# Session Details First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Gail Breneman gail.breneman@pnnl.gov US 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WAPNNL 99352 Brian Buynacek brian.buynacek@emerson.com US 138 Ashwood Lane Orchard Park NYEmerson 14127 Sam Cantrell samuel.cantrell@hillphoenix.com US 221 S. Berry St Brea CAHill Phoenix 92821 Joshua Cocciardi joshua.cocciardi@ee.doe.gov US 950 L'enfant south SW washington DCDepartment of Energy 20585 Steven Cousins stcousins@coca-cola.com US One Coca-Cola Plaza Atlanta GAThe Coca-Cola Company 30313 Donna Hostick donna.hostick@pnnl.gov US 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WAPacific Northwest National Laboratory 99352 Larry Howington larry.howington@hillphoenix.com US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VAAHRI 23834 Christopher Kent kent.christopher@epa.gov US 1200 Penn Avenue Washington DCUS EPA 20460 Bill Larson bilarson@norlake.com US 891 county road U Hudson WI Norlake 54016 Joanna Mauer jmauer@standardsasap.org US 529 14th St NW Suite 600 Washington DCAppliance Standards Awareness Project20045 Karen Meyers karen.meyers@rheem.com US 5600 Old Greenwood Road Fort Smith AR Rheem 72903 Hans Moons hans.moons@ec.europa.eu ES Calle Inca Garcilaso 3 Sevilla JRC-IPTS 41002 John Morris jmorris@nrac.com US 539 Dunksferry Rd Bensalem PAContinental Refrigerator 19020 Charity Njau charityn@summitappliance.com US 770 Garrison Ave Bronx NYFelix Storch Inc 10474 Joe Sanders jsanders@traulsen.com US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 Ron Shebik ron.shebik@hussmann.com US 12999 St. Charles Rock Road Bridgeton MOHussmann Corporation 63044 Sue Sieben susan.sieben@wdtl.com US PO Box 4929 Buffalo Grove IL Wellington Drive Technologies 60089 Charlie Souhrada csouhrada@nafem.org US 161 N. Clark St., Suite 2020 Chicago IL NAFEM 60601 Mike Stem mike.stem@intertek.com US 1809 Plano TX ITS 75074 mvuala suami mvuala.suami@nrcan.gc.ca CA 930 Carling Ave ottawa ONNRCAN K1A 0Y3 Detlef Westphalen detlef.westphalen@navigant.com US 77 South Bedford Street Burlington MANavigant Consulting, Inc. 01803 Linda Wilson linda.wilson@ag.ny.gov US 120 Broadway New York NYNYS office of the attorney general 10271 Dave Winiarski david.winiarski@pnnl.gov US 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WAPacific Northwest National Laboratory 99352 Michael Woodford mwoodford@ahrinet.org US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Sutie # 500 Arlington VAAHRI 22201 Chad Worth cworth@energy-solution.com US 1610 Harrison St. Oakland CAEnergy Solutions 94612 

# General Information
§ 19.50 How is this part written? ( a ) This part uses a “plain language” format to make it easier for the general public and business community to use. The section headings and text, often in the form of questions and answers, must be read together.
( b ) Pronouns used within this part, such as “I” and “you,” change from subpart to subpart depending on the audience being addressed. The pronoun “we” always is the Department of the Treasury.
( c ) The “Covered Transactions” diagram in the appendix to this part shows the levels or “tiers” at which the Department of the Treasury enforces an exclusion under this part.
Exhibit 10.1
 AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 Agreement Effective Date Company Indemnitee
  Avanir California Merger Prior
Agreements
 DGCL
   Charter Bylaws
 Board




---



##### 



Services to the Company
 Definitions
  Corporate Status
 Enforcement Expenses
 Enterprise
 Expenses
 Independent Counsel
 -2-




---



##### 



Proceeding provided however
 Indemnity in Third-Party Proceedings
 Indemnity in Proceedings by or in the Right of the Company
 -3-




---



##### 



Delaware Court
 Indemnification for Expenses of a Party Who is Wholly or Partly Successful
 Indemnification For Expenses of a Witness
 Additional Indemnification
     -4-




---



##### 



Exclusions
     Advances of Expenses
 Procedure for Notification and Defense of Claim
  -5-




---



##### 



Procedure Upon Application for Indemnification
  provided however
 -6-




---



##### 



Presumptions and Effect of Certain Proceedings
  nolo contendere
  Remedies of Indemnitee
 provided however
 -7-




---



##### 



Non-exclusivity; Survival of Rights; Insurance; Subrogation
  -8-




---



##### 



Third-Party Indemnitors
 -9-




---



##### 



Duration of Agreement
 Severability
 -10-




---



##### 



Enforcement
  provided however provided further
 Modification and Waiver
 Notice by Indemnitee
 Notices
   
  -11-




---



##### 



Contribution
 Applicable Law and Consent to Jurisdiction
 Identical Counterparts
 Miscellaneous
  AVANIR Pharmaceuticals, Inc.By:[Name][Office][Indemnitee][Name] -12-
** **

(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC)*,the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of March 1, 2017, relating to the **Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust2017-RB1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-RB1**(the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2017 (the "ReportingPeriod") has been made under the undersigned's supervision;

 

2.       to the best of theundersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

** **

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2018, I havehereunto signedmy name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WFCM 2017-RB1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00208

- CV

K EVIN S CRIBNER

, Appellant

V

.

R

ANDAL W INEINGER

, I NDIVIDUALLY

AND D / B / A A KINS O IL C OMPANY AND

P ARRA O IL AND G AS

, I NC

. , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 97th District

Co ur t

of Archer County (2018

- 0094A

- CV)

October 17, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s or der and final judgment. It is ordered that th e or der

and final judgment of the trial court are affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Ke vin Scribner shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

J ustice Dabney Bassel