alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...Office of the Ombuds

# Office of the Ombuds

## 				Our Mission			

					The Department of State Office of the Ombuds handles workplace conflicts that are not currently in a formal process and helps employees identify mutually satisfactory solutions.				

Ombuds

Jeanne M. Juliao

Back to Top
cEt3S1.UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIXPRO175HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105.3901APR252014InReplyAIR-3ReferTo:SAC12-01ShaneYoungFacilityManagerSierraPacificIndustries-AndersonDivision19758RiversideAvenueAnderson.CA96007Subject:FinalPreventionofSignificantDeteriorationPermitforSierraPacificIndustriesAndersonDivision,PSDPermitNo.SAC12-01DearMr.Young:TheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)Region9isherebyissuingandprovidingyouwithnoticeofourfinalpermitdecisiongranting,inaccordancewiththeCleanAirAct(CAA),asamended(42U.S.C7401etseq.),aPreventionofSignificantDeterioration(PSD)permitfortheSierraPacificIndustries-AndersonDivision(SPIorSPI-Anderson)facility.Thepermitauthorizestheconstructionandoperationofanew31megawattbiomassandnaturalgas-firedcogenerationunitandauxiliaryequipmentattheSPI-AndersonfacilityinAnderson,California.EPARegion9previouslyissuedadecisiononthispermitapplicationonFebruary19,2013.AfterpetitionsforreviewofthatdecisionwerefiledwithEPA’sEnvironmentalAppealsBoard(EABorBoard),theEABremandedthepermittoEPARegion9inpartanddirectedEPARegion9toreopenthepermitproceedingstoholdapublichearing,issueafinalpermitdecisionandrespondtoanynewcommentsreceivedduringthehearing.SeeInreSierraPactjicIndustries(AndersonProcessingFacility),PSDAppealNos.13-01to13-04,slipop.at67(EABJuly18,2013).WehavesincerevisedthePSDpermitbyincludingGHGemissionlimitsandrelatedrequirements.Wehavealsotakenthisopportunitytorevisecertainotherconditions(primarilyrelatedtomonitoring,performancetesting,andrecordkeeping)inthePSDpermittoaddressminortechnicalissuesweidentifiedsinceFebruary2013.OnNovember8,2013,wepublishednotificationsregardingtheopportunityforpubliccommentandweheldapublichearingonDecember10,2013.WeacceptedpubliccommentsontheproposedPSDpermitfromNovember8,2013untilJanuary10,2014.Duringthepubliccommentperiod,EPAreceivedwrittenandoralcommentsregardingtheproposedPSDpermittingactionfortheproject.EPAhascarefullyreviewedeachofthecommentssubmittedand,afterconsiderationoftheexpressedviewsofallcommenters,thepertinentFederalstatutesandregulations,andadditionalmaterialrelevanttotheapplicationandcontainedinourAdministrativeRecord,EPAhasmadeadecisioninaccordancewith40CFR52.21toissueafinalPSDpermittoSPI.PrintedonRecycledPaperEnclosedisacopyofthefinalPSDpermit,andourResponsetoCommentsdocumentforourfinalpermitdecision.Thefinalpermit,ResponsetoCommentsdocumentandotherkeydocumentsrelevant.tothefinalPSDpermitarealsoavailablethroughalinkatourwebsite,www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html#psd,oratwww.regulations.gov(DocketID#EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0634).EPA’sfinalpermitdecisionwillbecomeeffective30daysaftertheserviceofnoticeofthedecisionunlessourdecisionisappealedtotheEABpursuantto40CFR124.19.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthismatter,pleasecontactShaheerabKellyofthesRegion9AirPermitsOfficeat(415)947-4156.Director,AirDivisionEnclosurescc:TonyJaegel,SierraPacificIndustries—AndersonDivisionEricAlbright,ENVIRONInternationalCorporationRossBell,ShastaCountyAirQualityManagementDistrictJohnWaidrop,ShastaCountyAirQualityManagementDistrictRobertFletcher,CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2
#### § 551.304 Charcoal.

The term *charcoal* means any product classifiable in heading 3802 or 4402 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
#### § 549.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, *see* part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Rose M. DiMarco
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Rose M. DiMarco
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will
be retained by First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       -1-
#### KRUSINSKI *v.*KRUSINSKI.

1. Divorce — Extreme Cruelty — Intoxication.

Frequent intoxication of a husband, accompanied by charging his wife with infidelity, and by vile epithets in the presence of others, and ill treatment, constitutes extreme cruelty.

3. Same — Alimony.

Alimony amounting to $3 per week is awarded for the support of the wife and one child, as against a defendant who was capable of earning $3 a day.

Appeal from Wayne; Murfin, J.

Submitted April 11, 1912.

(Docket No. 114.)

Decided May 31, 1912.

Bill by Helena Krusinski against Wladislaus Krusinski for divorce. From a decree dismissing complainant’s bill, she appeals.

Reversed.

*James H.*Pound, for complainant.

*August Cryowski,*for defendant.

Moore, C. J.

This is a bill filed in chancery by the *562complainant for an absolute divorce. The charge is extreme cruelty and excessive use of intoxicants.

No testimony was offered on the part of defendant. From a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, the case is brought here by appeal.

During the 2£ years the parties lived together, two children were born to them. Soon after their separation, a third child was born. Next to the oldest child died. The proofs disclose that defendant frequently became intoxicated, and was cruel to his wife, calling her vile names and accusing her, in the presence of her mother and others, of a want of chastity. The case is clearly within *Berryman*v. *Berryman,*59 Mich. 605 (26 N. W. 789), and the recent case of *Murray*v. *Murray,*169 Mich. 388 (135 N. W. 262).

The record shows that when defendant is willing to work he earns $2 a day. The custody of the two children should be given to the mother, who has them. The defendant should pay to her, to help support them, the sum ■ of $3 each week until the further order of the court.

The decree is reversed, with costs of both courts. A decree may be entered in this court in accordance with this opinion.

Steere, McAlvay, Brooke, Blair, Stone, and Ostrander, JJ., concurred. Bird, J., did not sit.
§ 501.706 Prepenalty Notice; issuance by Director. ( a ) *When required.* If the Director has reason to believe there has occurred a violation of any provision of parts 500 or 515 of this chapter or a violation of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, direction or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary pursuant to parts 500 or 515 of this chapter or otherwise under the Trading With the Enemy Act, and the Director determines that further civil proceedings are warranted, the Director shall issue a Prepenalty Notice. The Prepenalty Notice may be issued whether or not another agency has taken any action with respect to the matter.
( b ) *Contents of notice* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The Prepenalty Notice shall describe the alleged violation, specify the laws and regulations allegedly violated, and state the amount of the proposed monetary penalty.
( 2 ) *Right to respond.* The Prepenalty Notice shall inform the respondent of respondent's right to make a written presentation within the time prescribed in § 501.707 as to why the respondent believes there should be no finding of a violation or why, if the respondent admits the violation, a monetary penalty should not be imposed or why, if imposed, the monetary penalty should be in a lesser amount than proposed. The Prepenalty Notice shall also inform the respondent that: ( i ) The act of submitting a written response by the respondent is a factor that may result in a lower penalty absent any aggravating factors; and
( ii ) If the respondent fails to respond to the Prepenalty Notice within the applicable 60-day period set forth in § 501.707, the Director may proceed with the issuance of a Penalty Notice.
( 3 ) *Right to request a hearing.* The Prepenalty Notice shall inform the respondent of respondent's right, if a subsequent Penalty Notice is issued, to request an administrative hearing. The Director will not consider any request for an administrative hearing until a Penalty Notice has been issued.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2587

 To carry out the international obligations of the United States under 
 the Geneva Conventions to provide criminal penalties for certain war 
                                crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 1995

  Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To carry out the international obligations of the United States under 
 the Geneva Conventions to provide criminal penalties for certain war 
                                crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``War Crimes Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN WAR CRIMES.

    (a) In General.--Title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after chapter 117 the following:

                       ``CHAPTER 118--WAR CRIMES

``Sec.
``2401. War crimes.
``Sec. 2401. War crimes
    ``(a) In General.--Whoever, whether inside or outside the United 
States, commits a grave breach of the Geneva conventions where the 
victim of such breach is member of the armed forces of the United 
States or a citizen of the United States, shall be fined under this 
title or imprisoned for life or any term or years, or both, and if 
death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of 
death.
    ``(b) Definitions.--As used in this section, the term `grave breach 
of the Geneva conventions' means conduct defined as a grave breach in 
any of the international conventions relating to the laws of warfare 
signed at Geneva 12 August 1949 or any protocol to any such convention, 
to which the United States is a party.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of chapters for part I of title 
18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to chapter 117 the following new item:

``118. War crimes...........................................    2401''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 510.209 Prohibited new investment in North Korea. ( a ) New investment, as defined in § 510.318, in North Korea by a U.S. person, wherever located, is prohibited.
( b ) The prohibitions in this section apply except to the extent provided by regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this part or pursuant to the export control authorities implemented by the U.S. Department of Commerce, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000858346
<NAME> WEST COAST REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,537,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,617,471
<PP&E>                                      42,267,548
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,945,504)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,708,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,078,471
<BONDS>                                     20,846,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,754,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,708,493
<SALES>                                      1,136,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,154,732
<CGS>                                          666,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  666,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             342,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### § 553.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.
HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs...Office of Policy, Planning, and Resources

# Office of Policy, Planning, and Resources

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Policy, Planning, and Resources for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs (R/PPR) provides long-term strategic planning and performance measurement capability for public diplomacy and public affairs programs. It also enables the Under Secretary to better advise on the allocation of public diplomacy and public affairs resources, to focus those resources on the most urgent national security objectives, and provide realistic measurement of public diplomacy's and public affairs' effectiveness.				

Director

Paul Kruchoski

            -  Expo Unit 
            -  U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy 

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1179

ROBERT MCGRAW,

Petitioner,

versus

PERRY BRANCH COAL COMPANY; WEST VIRGINIA COAL

WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND, INCORPORATED;

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-578-BLA)

Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: September 21, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

S. F. Raymond Smith, RUNDLE & RUNDLE, L.C., Pineville, West Virginia, for Petitioner. K. Keian Weld, Senior Assistant Attorney

General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert McGraw seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West

1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. See McGraw v. Perry Branch Coal Co., BRB No. 98-578-BLA

(B.R.B. Jan. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
Viewers
http://www.adobe.com.

----

Entire document
Errata Sheet #1
Errata Sheet #2
Errata Sheet #3
HomeBiographies...Victoria Taylor

# 				Victoria Taylor			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran						Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs												

				July 24, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

State Department Official

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1



DIVALL INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DiVall Income Properties 3 Limited Partnership (the Company) certifies
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                                        |  |                                       
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                |  | THE PROVO GROUP, INC., General Partner
|                |  |                                       
|Dated: 11/22/04 |  | By                                     |  | /s/ Bruce A. Provo                    
|                |  |                                        |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
|                |  |                                        |  | Chief Financial Officer               



This certification is
made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00465

- CV

T. C. , Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 20

- 004884 , THE HONORABLE AURORA MARTINEZ

- JONES , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

T. C . (Mother) appeals from the trial court ’ s final decree terminating her parental rights to her children, Z.D. and D.D

. 1 See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. Foll owing a b ench trial,

t he trial cou rt fou nd by clear and convincing evidence that statut ory grounds for terminating her parental rights existed and that termination was in the children ’ s best interest. See id.
§ 161.001(b)(1) (O), (2). On appeal, Mother ’ s court

- appointed attorney has file d a b r ief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Taylor v. Texas Dep ’ t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. , 160 S.W.3d 641, 646

– 47 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders proce d ure in appeal from termination of parental

1 We refer to appellant by her initials or as Mother and to the chi ldren by their initials

. See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8.2 rights). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating w hy there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See

386 U.S. at 744; Tayl or , 1 6 0 S.W.3d at 646

– 47. Mother ’ s counsel has certified to this Court that he provided Mother with a copy of the Anders brief and informed her of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. To date, Mother has not filed a pro s e bri e f. Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of the proceedings to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio , 48 8 U.S. 75,

80 (1988). We have reviewed the entire record, including the Anders brief s ubmit t ed on

Mother ’ s behalf, and have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit . Accordingly, we affirm the trial court ’ s final decree terminating Mother ’ s parental rights. 2

_____________ ____________ _

________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice

Before Justice s Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: January 12, 2022

2 We deny counsel ’ s motion to withdraw as attorney of record

. Se e In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam). If Mother, after consulting with counsel, desires to file a petition for review, counsel s hould timely file with the Texas Supreme Court “ a petition for review that satisfies the stan dards for an A n ders brief. ” See id. at 27

– 28.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certify, to the officers’ best knowledge and belief, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(a) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated
this 2nd day of
November, 2010.





First
      Community Bancshares, Inc./s/
      John M. MendezJohn
      M. MendezChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      David D. BrownDavid
      D. BrownChief
      Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4179

_____________________________

EDWARD LYDELL SPAULDING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

February 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.