alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GONZALO VALDOVINOS-BLANCO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NEIL H. ADLER, Warden; BURNETT

RUCKER, M.D.; MANAGEMENT AND

TRAINING CORPORATION; FEDERAL

BUREAU OF PRISONS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16289

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-00211-BAM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Barbara McAuliffe, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted February 14, 2014*** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

FILED

OCT 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Gonzalo Valdovinos-Blanco appeals pro se the district court’s judgment

dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), his action alleging deliberate

indifference to his medical needs and violation of his Eight Amendment rights. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Because Valdovinos-Blanco alleged wrongdoing at a federal prison rather

than wrongdoing by persons acting under color of state law, the magistrate judge

properly characterized Valdovinos-Blanco’s claims as an action under Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), not

an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Daly-Murphy v. Winston, 837 F.2d 348,

355 (9th Cir. 1987); see also Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 255 n.2 (2006);

Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 2011). 

Valdovinos-Blanco contends that the magistrate judge erred by dismissing

his action without granting leave to amend. He was imprisoned at a privately

operated federal prison. A Bivens action alleging improper medical care may not

be pursued against any of the defendants in this action. See Minneci v. Pollard,

132 S. Ct. 617, 626 (2012) (holding that federal prisoner may not pursue a Bivens

claim against privately employed personnel working at a privately operated federal

prison where the allegedly wrongful conduct is of a kind that typically falls within

the scope of traditional state tort law, such as improper medical care); Correctional

2
Services Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 63 (2001) (holding that a Bivens action

may not be brought against a private corporation); FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471,

484-86 (1994) (holding that a Bivens cause of action may not be brought against a

government agency). Because the magistrate judge correctly concluded that

Valdovinos-Blanco cannot cure this deficiency by amendment, she did not abuse

her discretion by dismissing the action without leave to amend. See Lopez v.

Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (setting forth standard of

review and explaining that leave to amend should be granted unless the

deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment).

AFFIRMED.

3
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(09)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(09)

1 January 1996

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

CAREER PROFILE SUPPLEMENT -

MECHANICAL ENGINEER

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          32,360
<SECURITIES>                                   [BLANK]
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                   [BLANK]
<INVENTORY>                                    [BLANK]
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,853
<PP&E>                                           2,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,726
<BONDS>                                        [BLANK]
<COMMON>                                            85
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,369
<PREFERRED>                                    [BLANK]
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,593
<SALES>                                         16,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,442
<CGS>                                            4,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               [BLANK]
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               [BLANK]
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             [BLANK]
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            [BLANK]
<DISCONTINUED>                                 [BLANK]
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                [BLANK]
<CHANGES>                                      [BLANK]
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15<FN><1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  [BLANK]
<FN> 
Footnote
--------
<1> Pro forma net income (loss) per common and common equivalent share. 
    Includes common stock options issued after July 1, 1994, pursuant to the
    treasury stock method, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission
    Rules.
         

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00787
- CR

Emmanuel Grear, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 299TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 15
- 204897 , THE HONORABLE KARE N SAGE, JUDGE PRESID ING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 10, 2019 . On counsel’s
motion s , the time for filing was extended to June 24, 2019 . Appellant’s counsel has now filed a
third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filin g appellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than August 8, 2019 . No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the
referral of this case t o the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on July 11, 2019

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Do Not Publish
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Georgia and Montenegro

# 											Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Georgia and Montenegro									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 10, 2024

Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs James C. O’Brien will travel to Tbilisi, Georgia, and Podgorica and Kotor, Montenegro, May 14-17.  In Georgia, he will meet with representatives from government, civil society, and the private sector to express the United States’ enduring commitment to the Georgian people and to Georgia’s desire for a peaceful, prosperous, and secure Euro-Atlantic future.

In Montenegro, Assistant Secretary O’Brien will take part in the Western Balkans Growth Plan Regional Leaders’ Summit in Kotor alongside EU partners and senior government officials from across the region.  His engagements at the summit will focus on the regional economic integration and growth opportunity offered by the EU’s Western Balkans Growth Plan and reinforce the United States’ strong support for the Western Balkans’ path toward EU membership.  Assistant Secretary O’Brien will also meet senior Montenegrin government officials to discuss our bilateral cooperation in support of Montenegro’s full Euro-Atlantic integration.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
Court Documents from Honeywell v. EPA

1.) Opening  Brief from Honeywell and DuPont

2.) Opening Brief from EPA

3.) Opening Brief of Intervenors from Arkema and Solvay

4.) Joint Opposition to Hold the Case in Abeyance from Arkema and Solvay

5.) Joint Motion to Dismiss from Arkema and Solvay

6.) Reply Brief from Honeywell and DuPont
§ 544.511 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( 1 ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( 2 ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( 3 ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing;
( 4 ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and
( 5 ) The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
( b ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
[87 FR 78473, Dec. 21, 2022]
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificate is furnishedpursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 29, 2017, by andamong Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), HyundaiABS Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned herebycertifies that:

 

1)       I am a duly authorizedofficer of the Servicer.

 

2)       A review of theactivities of the Servicer from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’sperformance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)       Based on such review,the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Compliance Certificatethis 15th day of March, 2019.
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs...Division for International Finance and Development

# Division for International Finance and Development

					Subscribe					

## 				Investment Relationships, Development Finance, and Macroeconomic Affairs			

					The International Finance and Development (IFD) division leads the Bureau’s work on development finance, investment, and macroeconomic issues, in cooperation with other U.S. government agencies.  We promote prosperity at home and abroad by supporting international standards, private sector development, good governance, and transparency that promote U.S. economic growth and job creation.  We support foreign investment in the United States and stable, transparent investment climates overseas that welcome U.S. private sector activity.  IFD engages in bilateral, regional, and multilateral settings to promote policies that support U.S. economic and foreign policy interests.				

Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Finance and Development

Roland de Marcellus

							Follow Us:																			TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Investment Climate Statements

## 							Policy Issues						

        -  											Development Finance										 
        -  											Investment Affairs										 
        -  											Macroeconomic Affairs										 

### 											Development Finance											

Leveraging development finance to foster sustainable development, support American jobs, and create export opportunities for U.S. companies.
													Learn More about Development Finance													Development Finance

### 											Investment Affairs											

Creating balanced investment relationships to support U.S. jobs and safeguard our national security.
													Learn More about Investment Affairs													Investment Affairs

### 											Macroeconomic Affairs											

Promoting international financial stability and leveling the playing field for U.S. companies and workers by promoting fiscal transparency and combatting bribery of foreign government officials.
													Learn More about Macroeconomic Affairs													Macroeconomic Affairs

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CSA Income
Fund Limited Partnership IV's Statement of Financial Position as of
September 30, 2000 and Statement of Operations for the nine months then ended
and is qualified in its entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,559,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  191,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      45,259,350
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,389,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,621,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,714,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,621,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,352,380
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,843,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               340,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             389,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                778,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            778,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   778,747
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<FN>
<F1>The registrant maintains an unclassified Statement of Financial Position.
</FN>


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 281.3 Collections.

Foreign exchange collected by agencies shall be delivered promptly into the custody of accountable officers for credit to accounts of the Secretary of the Treasury (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary) unless otherwise directed by the Secretary. The term “collections,” for the purpose of these regulations in this part, does not include foreign exchange acquired by the United States by purchase with dollars. The accountable officer shall maintain records, showing the collections, by source, and indicating the miscellaneous receipt accounts or other accounts in the Treasury to be credited with dollar proceeds from sale of the foreign exchange, and such further classifications as may be needed to indicate exchange which can be used only for restricted purposes. Accountable officers shall be advised by the collecting agencies of the source of collections and any restrictions on the use of the foreign exchange in order that the foregoing records may be maintained.
#### § 560.317 Credits or loans.

The term *credits* or *loans* means any transfer or extension of funds or credit on a basis of an obligation to repay, or any assumption or guarantee of the obligation of another to repay an extension of funds or credit, including but not limited to: Overdrafts; currency swaps; purchases of debt securities issued by the Government of Iran; purchases of a loan made by another person; sales of financial assets subject to an agreement to repurchase; renewals or refinancings whereby funds or credits are transferred to or extended to a prohibited borrower or prohibited recipient; the issuance of standby letters of credit; and drawdowns on existing lines of credit.
#### Deonea YAMAUCHI, Surviving spouse of Wallace Yoshio, social security # [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], on behalf of self and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner Social Security Administration, Appellee.

No. 99-2389.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 2, 2001.

Decided Jan. 31, 2001.

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Deonea Yamauchi appeals from the district court’s 1 order remanding her claims for a hearing before an administrative law judge and denying class certification in this mandamus action against the Commissioner of Social Security. Having carefully reviewed the record and the submissions of the parties, we conclude that Ms. Yamauchi is not entitled to any further relief. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
#### UNITED STATES of America and Internal Revenue Service Officer, Amelia Lerma, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Ada D. LAVOIE, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 86-2178.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1986.

Ada D. Lavoie, pro se.

Harold Wayne Campbell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., for petitioners-appellees.

Before GEE, REAVLEY, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This pathetic and frivolous appeal from the trial court’s order enforcing an administrative summons for documents and records of income for taxable years 1982, 1983 and 1984 is entirely lacking in merit.1 We have repeatedly warned, in opinions too numerous to collect here2, against the bringing of such frivolous appeals; and while we take no pleasure in punishing misguided persons such as the present appellant, such actions cannot be allowed to continue. We grant the Government’s motion for damages and double costs and remand for assessment of their amount.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

1

. Appellant contends, for illustration, that as a "Sovereign Texas citizen" she is "not the object nor the subject of the revenue laws.” Insofar as we can comprehend her remaining contentions, such as that of a right to be represented by

2

. *See Stites v. United States,*746 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir.1984), and cases cited at 1086.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40572

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES DANIEL DEARING, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(9:01-CR-8-1)

December 31, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Daniel Dearing, Jr., appeals the revocation of his

term of supervised release, received for violating 21 U.S.C.

841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B) (possession with intent to distribute

approximately 327 kilograms of marijuana).

Dearing contends the district court lacked jurisdiction to

revoke his supervised release. Questions of jurisdiction are

reviewed de novo. E.g., United States v. Alvarado, 201 F.3d 379,

381 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court’s jurisdiction “extends
beyond the expiration of the term of supervised release for any

period reasonably necessary for the adjudication of matters arising

before its expiration” if, as here, a warrant or summons is issued

before expiration. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) (emphasis added). Dearing

asserts his revocation hearing was held subsequent to the

“reasonably necessary” period. 

The total delay was approximately 13 months. On similar

facts, our court held recently that a delay of almost three years

did not result in a loss of jurisdiction. United States

v. Naranjo, 259 F.3d 379 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

1163 (2002). On this record, the district court retained

jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 355.12 What requirements apply if the check is payable to two or more persons?

If the fiscal agency check is payable to two or more persons, the requirements of this part apply to all designated payees.
§ 555.504 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 555.201 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution. A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name. Note 1 to § 555.504 :
*See* § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers. *See also* § 555.203 concerning the obligation to hold blocked funds in interest-bearing accounts.
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP OUI OF MENCO

LLOYD

Adahes or Wasuagan, DC

CORTOUR PAITW¥AL, 90 METRES 11 MAteaMAn
WF 1a WANE sea

DATUM. MEAN LOWEN ich Waste

eanevtnsk MURAI Momcto