alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Executive Secretariat Home
- About Us
- Leadership

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...Executive Secretariat

# Executive Secretariat

## 				Our Mission			

					The Executive Secretariat, comprised of the Executive Secretary, four Deputy Executive Secretaries, and their staff, is responsible for coordination of the work of the Department internally, serving as the liaison between the Department's bureaus and the offices of the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, and Under Secretaries. The Executive Secretariat also handles the Department's relations with the White House, National Security Council, and other Cabinet agencies.				

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2497

To amend the National Labor Relations Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 1995

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROPERTY ACCESS.

4 Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act

5 is amended by adding after ‘‘section 7’’ the following:

6 ‘‘Provided, That an employer is not required to allow ac7 cess to its business property to employees or nonemployees

8 for purposes of union organizing, solicitation, distribution,

9 picketing, or other union advocacy or activities, even if the

10 employer allows such access to organizations for chari11 table, civic, or religious purposes.’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1226

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to make uniform the

application of the overtime exemption for inside sales personnel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. FAWELL (for himself and Mr. PETRI) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to make

uniform the application of the overtime exemption for

inside sales personnel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNIFORM EXEMPTION.

4 Section 7(i) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

5 (29 U.S.C. 207(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘a retail or

6 service establishment’’ and inserting ‘‘an establishment’’.

Æ
Order entered June 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00173-CR

No. 05-13-00174-CR

No. 05-13-00175-CR

MICHAEL DAVID ORY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 219-82844-2011, 219-82846-2011, 219-82847-2011

ORDER

These appeals are companion cases to the appeal in cause no. 05-13-00172-CR. The 

clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed. Appellant has filed a brief for cause no. 05-13-

00172-CR, but has not filed a brief that applies to the above three cases.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW144811]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and 
Lance Oil & Gas Company for noncompetitive oil and gas lease WYW144811 
for land in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and 
was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease 
terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Carmen E. 
Lovett, Land Law Examiner, at (307) 775-6160.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 18\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessees have 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessees 
have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out 
in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW144811 effective April 1, 2009, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Carmen E. Lovett,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. E9-20322 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
## NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 280

- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ELIJAH TATES

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 8 5 th District Court

of Brazos C ounty, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Order Per Curiam

A jury convicted appellant Elijah Tates of evading arrest, a state jail felony

enhanced to a third

- degree felony due to prior convictions

. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

.

§ § 12.425(a) ; 38.04( b )(1 ). The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ confinement

following a punishment hearing held via teleconference

. See id. § 12.3 4

.2 On appeal, Tates argues, in part, that the trial court erred in holding the punishment

phase of trial by remote conference in violation of his “ Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth

Amendments of the United States Constitution, Art. I, Sections 10 and 19 of the Texas

Constitution and Art. 33.03 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

, and his absence

was category one or two Marin error not subject to procedural default .” See U.S. C ONST

.

amend s. V, VI, XIV ; T EX

. C ONST

. art. 1, §§ 10, 19; T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. a rt. 33.03 ; see

also Marin v. State

, 851 S.W.2d 275 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (abrogated by Matchett v.

State

, 941 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)) and (overruled by, Cain v. State

, 947

S.W.2d 262 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)).

T he Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently granted petition for review on a

similar issue 1 in two companion case s arising from our sister c ourt. See Lira v. State

, No.

11

- 20

- 00148

- CR,

__ S.W.3d

__, __, 2021 WL 924893

, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Eastland Mar.

11, 2021

, pet. granted ) ; Huddleston v. State

, No. 11

- 20

- 00149

- CR,

__ S.W.3d

__, __,

2021 WL 924850

, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Eastland Mar. 11, 2021

, pet. granted )

.

On its own motion, th is Court, having reexamined and reconsidered the documents

on file, issues the following ruling. This appeal is ABATED until such time as the Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals issues its opinion in the direct appeal on one of the

aforementioned companion causes. After that opinion issues, we direct appellant to

promptly file a motion to reinstate the appeal, which shall reference and include a copy of

1 At issue in Lira and Huddleston is whether a defendant’s right to be physically present during

court proceedings is a “substantive” right, and therefore, “immune to modification in times of emergency,”

and which harm analysis, if any, applies where the defendant is deprived of such right

. See Lira v. State

, No. 11

- 20

- 00148

- CR,

__ S.W.3d

__, __, 2021 WL 924893, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Eastland Mar. 11, 2021, pet.

granted); Huddleston v. State

, No. 11

- 20

- 00149

- CR,

__ S.W.3d

__, __, 2021 WL 924850, at *3 (Tex. App.

—

Eastland Mar. 11, 2021, pet. granted).3 the opinion issued by the court of criminal appeals.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 ( b ).

Delivered and filed on the

2 7th day of July

, 202 1

.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 27 7 4

_____________________________
J OSEPH B ERNARD W ILLIAMS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 18, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

R OBERTS , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Joseph Bernard Williams , pro se , Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00380

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.N

- P. , a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- PA

- 01933 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal because h e qualifies as indigent. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. (the “ Company ”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (“ Form 10-K ”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.








Date: March 23, 2018  By: /s/ Michael Stock


Michael Stock


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(02-E)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(02-E)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

MAINTENANCE, TRADE OR 

CRAFT POSITIONS

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
#### § 548.304 Defense and related materiel sector of the Belarus economy.

The term *defense and related materiel sector of the Belarus economy* includes military, armed forces, or security forces of or within Belarus; the use of arms or related materiel by military, armed forces, or security forces of or within Belarus; any person manufacturing, supplying, financing, procuring, or distributing goods, services, or technology to, from, or involving military, armed forces, or security forces of or within Belarus; and any related activities, including the provision or receipt of goods, services, or technology involving the defense and related materiel sector of the Belarus economy.
§ 526.506 Investment and reinvestment of certain funds. Subject to the requirements of § 526.203, U.S. financial institutions are authorized to invest and reinvest assets blocked pursuant to § 526.201, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The assets representing such investments and reinvestments are credited to a blocked account or subaccount that is held in the same name at the same U.S. financial institution, or within the possession or control of a U.S. person, but funds shall not be transferred outside the United States for this purpose;
( b ) The proceeds of such investments and reinvestments shall not be credited to a blocked account or subaccount under any name or designation that differs from the name or designation of the specific blocked account or subaccount in which such funds or securities were held; and
( c ) No immediate financial or economic benefit accrues (*e.g.,* through pledging or other use) to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ THOMAS W. BURGHART

Thomas W. Burghart
Vice President and Treasurer
May 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2674 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2674

   To modify the application of the antitrust laws to encourage the 
       licensing and other use of certain intellectual property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 1995

Mr. Hyde (for himself, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Gekas, Mr. 
Coble, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Canady of Florida, Mr. Bono, Mr. Bryant 
of Tennessee, and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the application of the antitrust laws to encourage the 
       licensing and other use of certain intellectual property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intellectual Property Antitrust 
Protection Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF MARKET POWER PRESUMPTION.

    In any action in which the conduct of an owner, licensor, licensee, 
or other holder of an intellectual property right is alleged to be in 
violation of the antitrust laws in connection with the marketing or 
distribution of a product or service protected by such a right, such 
right shall not be presumed to define a market, to establish market 
power (including economic power and product uniqueness or 
distinctiveness), or to establish monopoly power.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``antitrust laws''--
                    (A) has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of 
                the first section of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)), 
                except that such term includes section 5 of the Federal 
                Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent such 
                section applies to unfair methods of competition; and
                    (B) includes any State law similar to the laws 
                referred to in subparagraph (A); and
            (2) the term ``intellectual property right'' means a right, 
        title, or interest--
                    (A) in subject matter patented under title 35, 
                United States Code; or
                    (B) in a work, including a mask work, protected 
                under title 17, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
HomeBureau of Diplomatic Technology...Bureau of Information Resource Management  Releases

# Bureau of Diplomatic Technology Releases

27 items

        -    Remarks  		Modernizing Cybersecurity in U.S. Diplomatic Technology:  Our Global Call to Action	  Keith A. JonesDecember 2, 2021Keynote Remarks at the Security Transition Summit 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Chief Information Officer Keith Jones To Deliver Keynote Address at FedScoop’s “Security Transition Summit”	  December 1, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Concludes Cybersecurity Workshop with Modernization Plans	  November 4, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Holds Cybersecurity Workshop	  October 13, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Keynote Address at IRM’s 2021 Virtual Workshop	  Keith A. JonesOctober 4, 2021 
        -    		Department of State Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Policy Statement	  September 21, 2021 
        -    		Bruce Begnell	  July 26, 2021 
        -    		Ivan Watson	  July 1, 2021 
        -    		Donna S.  Bennett	  April 21, 2021 
        -    		Department of State Vulnerability Disclosure Policy	   

previous page123next page

Back to Top
II

Calendar No. 370

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2630

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 17, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2630 PCS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CON2 STRUCTION DEADLINE FOR HYDROELECTRIC

3 PROJECT IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 3246, the

8 Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the

9 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

10 and public interest requirements of that section and the

11 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend until

12 October 15, 1997, the time period during which the li13 censee is required to commence construction of the

14 project.

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

16 on the expiration of the extension, issued by the Commis17 sion under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

18 806), of the period required for commencement of con19 struction of the project described in subsection (a).

20 (c) REINSTATMENT OF LICENSE.—The Commission

21 is authorized to reinstate the license for the project re22 ferred to in subsection (a), effective as of the date of its

23 expiration or termination.

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 370

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2630

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Illinois. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State

APRIL 17, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
#### § 535.905 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, to licensing procedures (including those pursuant to statements of licensing policy), and to other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.

[62 FR 45107, Aug. 25, 1997]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 359.40 How can I find out what my definitive Series I savings bonds are worth? ( a ) *Redemption values.* Redemption values are available for definitive bonds in various formats and media. ( 1 ) You may determine the redemption value for definitive bonds on the Internet at *www.savingsbonds.gov .*
( 2 ) You may download savings bonds calculators from the Internet at *www.savingsbonds.gov .*
( 3 ) You may obtain paper tables from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-1328. We reserve the right to cease making paper tables of redemption values available.
( b ) *Redemption penalty.* Redemption values published in the tables reflect the three-month interest penalty applied to bonds redeemed prior to five years from the date of issue.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7653** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ARNOLD LLOYD JACKSON Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 5:02

- cr - 30020

- SGW

- 13; 5:07

- cv - 80014

- SGW

- mfu )

Submitted : May 31 , 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Arnold Lloyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arnold Lloyd Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Because the distric t court lacked the authority to consider Jackson ’s motion for reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 570.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.