alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (128)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         111,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                (65,224)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         29,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,846
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Colombia (22-722) – Amendment to Agreement Concerning Exchange of Research and Development Information

# 									Colombia (22-722) – Amendment to Agreement Concerning Exchange of Research and Development Information							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 22, 2022

Defense: Research and Development

Signed at Bogota and Washington July 21 and July 22, 2022; entered into force July 22, 2022.

Amendment of agreement of July 21, 2009: TIAS 09-721.
Download Agreement						 [2 MB]

Tags

ColombiaDefenseTreaties

Back to Top
#### § 569.406 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked.

Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 569.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 569.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
#### Lawrence R. ALBERTI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Johnny KLEVENHAGEN, Sheriff of Harris County, Texas, et al., Defendants, Johnny Klevenhagen, Sheriff of Harris County, Texas, and Harris County Commissioners Court, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 85-2036.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1986.

Roderick O. Lawrence, Lupe Salinas, Asst. Co. Attys., for Harris County.

Mike Driscoll, Co. Atty., Houston, Tex., for Klevenhagen.

James T. Oitzinger, Bruce V. Griffiths, Atty., Greater Houston Chapter of Am. Civil Liberties Union, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before BROWN, REAVLEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 6/4/86, 5th Cir., 1986, 790 F.2d 1220)

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

We write further, however, to clarify the portion of the majority opinion which dealt with the appointment of the plaintiffs’ attorney as ombudsman. *See Alberti v. Klevenhagen,*790 F.2d 1220, 1229-30 (5th Cir.1986). We adhere to our holding that, given the posture of this issue, no reversible error was shown on this record. However, we do not approve the appointment. It raises a serious question of the appearance of judicial propriety, one which a future panel of this court may well condemn in a better developed factual setting. However, as the ombudsman in this case has tendered his resignation to the district court, we need not address this issue any further. Moreover, the order of the district court which included the appointment of the ombudsman, entered in 1975, has never been appealed; the parties have never before raised, briefed, or argued this issue, either here or below. Accordingly, the majority opinion analyzed this issue to determine whether an actual conflict of interest existed, and concluded only that the record did not support the finding of such a conflict.
#### § 13.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes the procedures governing protective and financial assistance to State and local governments when an extraordinary protective need requires the protection of foreign diplomatic missions as authorized by sections 202 and 208 of Title 3, U.S. Code, as amended and added, respectively, by Pub. L. 94-196 (89 Stat. 1109).
§ 542.412 Transactions relating to Syrian petroleum or petroleum products from third countries; transshipments. ( a ) Transactions relating to goods containing petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin are not prohibited by § 542.208 or § 542.209 if the petroleum or petroleum products have been incorporated into manufactured products or substantially transformed in a third country by a person other than a United States person.
( b ) Transactions relating to petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin that have not been incorporated into manufactured products or substantially transformed in a third country, including those that have been transshipped through a third country, are prohibited.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1786

RONNY RAMON SANCHEZ, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 28, 2009 Decided: February 19, 2009

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aroon Roy Padharia, LAW OFFICE OF AROON R. PADHARIA, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Ronny Ramon Sanchez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision and affirming the finding that he is removable as an aggravated felon based on his state conviction for misdemeanor petit larceny. Although Sanchez contends on appeal that the crime of petit larceny is a misdemeanor under Virginia law and therefore cannot be considered an aggravated felony, this argument is foreclosed by our decision in Wireko v. Reno , 211 F.3d 833, 834 (4th Cir. 2000) (“Under the plain language of [the statute defining aggravated felony], there is no requirement that the offense actually have been a felony, as that term is conventionally understood.”); see also United States v. Graham , 169 F.3d 787, 790-93 (3rd Cir. 1999) (holding that an alien who had been convicted of misdemeanor petit larceny under New York law and sentenced to the maximum sentence of one year was removable as an aggravated felon as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) (2006)). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

23 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
1 PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 10

- 3476

_____________

DESMOND L. MAYNARD,

Appellant

v.

CARMELO RIVERA,

COMMISSIONER OF THE VIRGINS ISLANDS

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

CHERYL MARTIN

- LIBURD

______________

AP PEAL FROM the District COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

– APPELLATE

DIVISION

(D.C. Civil No. 05

- cv

- 00171)

Chief Judge: Honorable Curtis V. Gómez

District Judge: Honorable Raymond L. Finch

Superior Court Judge: Honorable Patricia D. Steele

______________

Argued December 5, 2011

______________

Before: FISHER, GREENAWAY, JR., and ROTH, Circuit Judges

.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appearing that due to a word processing error the section titles were omitted

from the opinion filed on April 2, 2012, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion is

amended so that the section titles are included as follows:

I. BACKGROUND2 II. JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW

III. ANALYSIS

IV. CONCLUSION

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Cler k

Date: April 12, 2012

TMK/smw/cc: Shawn E. Maynard

- Hahnfeld, Esq.

Tiffany V. Monrose, Esq.

William W. Franks, Esq.

Tina G. La Borde, Esq.
#### § 539.309 License.

Except as otherwise specified, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
40193.

#### JOHNSON v. KIDD.

Decided June 18, 1963.

Jordan, Judge.

C. G. Johnson, a dealer in shrubbery stock, landscaping and grading, filed suit on open account to recover the sum of $401 for landscaping services allegedly rendered the defendants, William G. Petty and Richard C. Kidd. The defendant Kidd filed an answer in which he denied that he was indebted to the plaintiff in any amount and the suit (which had been dismissed as to the defendant Petty) proceeded to trial before the court without the intervention of a jury. The trial court entered verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant and the exception is to the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the general grounds only. *Held:*

Under the evidence adduced in behalf of the defendant who testified that he had entered into a contract with Petty, a building contractor, for the construction of a residence on certain property owned by the defendant for the sum of $28,500 which contract included landscaping of the grounds, that Petty had engaged the services of the plaintiff to do said landscaping, that he had entered into no separate agreement with the plaintiff for the performance of said services or the payment of said account, and that at the time of the final payment to the contractor he did not know that the plaintiff had not been paid and had received an affidavit from the contractor that all bills for labor and materials had been paid, a finding was authorized that the obligation to pay the account sued upon was that of the contractor and not of the defendant.

The verdict for the defendant was authorized by the evidence and the trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*

*54
      *Albert A. Roberts,*for plaintiff in error.

*Heyman, Abram, Young, Hicks '& Maloof, Robert G. Young,*contra.
§ 570.511 Official business of certain international organizations and entities. All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the following entities by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized: ( a ) The United Nations, including its Programmes, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations;
( b ) The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA);
( c ) The African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing;
( d ) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and
( e ) The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (443)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,134
<PP&E>                                          23,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,021)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,264
<SALES>                                         47,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,628
<CGS>                                           23,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,667
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2019...Chapter 13: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019

# 									Chapter 13: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2019							

2019 Digest: Chapter 13 [897 KB]

Tags

International LawLegal Adviser

Back to Top
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...Building Capacity Across the U.S. Government

# Building Capacity Across the U.S. Government

The Office of International Religious Freedom helps build the capacity of foreign affairs professionals throughout the U.S. government to effectively partner with faith-based leaders, organizations, and communities in pursuit of foreign policy goals. 

We offer courses in religious literacy and faith-based actor engagement at the Foreign Service Institute, which delivers world-class diplomatic training to foreign affairs professionals from multiple U.S. government agencies. 

Our Office partners with the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships to jointly train U.S. diplomats, development professionals, and local staff at U.S. embassies and consulates around the world on how to partner effectively and inclusively with faith actors in the local contex*t.* 

We collaborate with the U.S. Department of Defense’s US Army Institute for Religious Leadership to train and equip military chaplains to better engage international faith-based actors in pursuit of national security goals.

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Chad National Day

# 									Chad National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 11, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my warmest wishes to the people of the Republic of Chad on the 62nd anniversary of your independence.

On this occasion, we celebrate decades of partnership, collaboration, and mutual respect between the United States and Chad.

We support the people of Chad in their pursuit of an inclusive national dialogue, a new constitution, and free and fair elections that are conducted peacefully and are consistent with the May 2021 African Union Communique on Chad.

In this historic time of transition for Chad, we remain focused on opportunities to work together to strengthen democratic institutions and access to justice, combat terrorism, promote regional stability and respect for human rights, improve trade and investment, and address climate and conservation issues.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsChadOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### § 579.502 [Reserved]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Commemorating the Days of Holocaust Remembrance

# 									Commemorating the Days of Holocaust Remembrance							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

May 5, 2024

During this week of National Holocaust Remembrance, we remember the six million Jews who were murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators, as well as the millions of others, including Roma, LGBTQI+ persons, Slavs, and persons with disabilities who were persecuted and killed.  Holocaust survivors and their families are a testament to courage and resilience.  They are a living rebuke to those who sought to extinguish the future of the Jewish people and to those who try to distort or deny the Holocaust.  Nazis and their collaborators engaged in murder on an unprecedented scale, systematically killing people simply because they were different.  May we never forget the harrowing lessons of the Holocaust as we recommit ourselves to ensuring such horrors are never again perpetrated, suffered, or witnessed by humankind.

Tags

AntisemitismBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDisabilityHolocaust IssuesHuman RightsLGBT RightsOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Rina Amiri

# 				Rina Amiri			

															U.S. Special Envoy for Afghan Women, Girls, and Human Rights						Office of Global Women’s Issues												

				January 6, 2022 -									Present							

*For more on the Special Envoy’s work, please follow her on Twitter.*

Tags

Office of Global Women’s IssuesState Department Official

Back to Top
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into as of September 1, 2012, by and between CORVEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”). 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and
Bank dated as of May 28, 2009, as amended from time to time (“Credit Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower
have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1. Section 1.1. (a) is hereby amended by deleting “September 1, 2012” as the last day on which Bank will make advances
under the Line of Credit, and by substituting for said date “September 1, 2013,” with such change to be effective upon the execution and delivery to Bank of a promissory note dated as of September 1, 2012 (which promissory note shall
replace and be deemed the Line of Credit Note defined in and made pursuant to the Credit Agreement) and all other contracts, instruments and documents required by Bank to evidence such change. 

2. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without
waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document. 

3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth
therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would
constitute any such Event of Default. 
 UNDER OREGON LAW, MOST AGREEMENTS, PROMISES AND COMMITMENTS MADE BY BANK CONCERNING LOANS AND
OTHER CREDIT EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE NOT FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES OR SECURED SOLELY BY THE BORROWER’S RESIDENCE MUST BE IN WRITING, EXPRESS CONSIDERATION AND BE SIGNED BY BANK TO BE ENFORCEABLE. 

  
 -1-









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
day and year first written above. 
  

									
	 CORVEL CORPORATION
	 		 	 WELLS FARGO BANK,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Scott R. McCloud
	 		 	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	Scott R. McCloud	 		 		 	Dawn M. Moore, Relationship Manager
	Title:	 	CFO	 		 		 	


  
 -2-