alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2701 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2701

To repeal the requirement relating to specific statutory authorization 
  for increases in judicial salaries, to provide for automatic annual 
        increases for judicial salaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 1995

Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Heineman, and Mrs. Clayton) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the requirement relating to specific statutory authorization 
  for increases in judicial salaries, to provide for automatic annual 
        increases for judicial salaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES.

    (a) Repeal of Statutory Requirement Relating to Judicial 
Salaries.--Section 140 of the resolution entitled ``A Joint Resolution 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and 
for other purposes.'', approved December 15, 1981 (Public Law 97-92; 95 
Stat. 1200; 28 U.S.C. 461 note) is repealed.
    (b) Automatic Annual Increases.--Section 461(a) of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period 
beginning on or after January 1 of each calendar year, each salary rate 
which is subject to adjustment under this section shall be adjusted by 
an amount, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or if midway 
between multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of $100) equal 
to the percentage of such salary rate which corresponds to the most 
recent percentage change in the Employment Cost Index, as determined 
under section 704(a)(1) of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 526.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *International Emergency Economic Powers Act.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions that are exempt pursuant to section 203(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)).
( b ) *Official business.* The prohibitions contained in § 526.201(a) do not apply to transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
# In the Court of Criminal

Appeals of Texas

══════════ No. WR

- 75,547

- 03

══════════

EX PARTE BOBBY PEREZ ,

Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════ On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 02

- 02

- 8 6 56

- 1

- CR in the 454th District Court

F rom Medina County

═══════════════════════════════════════

Y EARY , J., filed a concurring opinion , in which K ELLER , P.J. , and S LAUGHTER , J. , joined.

Applicant was convicted in 2002 of murder and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
In March 2022, Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC . art. 11.07. In his application, he allege s , among other things, that his plea wasPEREZ

– 2

involuntary because his trial counsel was ineffective

. Today, th e Court remands this application to the trial court to further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and its possible application to this case. See Ex parte Smit h , 444 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to sua sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille , ___ S.W.3d ___,
No. WR

- 89,851

- 02, 2022 WL 108348 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 2022) (Yeary, J., concurring).
Th e doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this one. Applicant’s trial occurred in 2002 , but this writ application was not filed until almost twenty years later. 1 The record is also silent regarding circumstances that may excuse Applicant’ s delay, and at least some explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided. Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “ may sua sponte consider and determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith , 444 S.W.3d at 667. If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay , and give the State’s prosecutors and/or former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state whether Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their abili ty to defend against Applicant’s claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial court may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years after a conviction becomes f inal.” Ex parte Perez , 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe , 132 S.W.3d 434, 437

– 39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)).PEREZ

– 3

doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order. With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED : June 8, 2022 DO NOT PUBLISH
#### Banco de Puerto Rico, etc., Plaintiff and Appellee, *v.*Cristóbal Cruet Carrasquillo et ux., Defendants and Appellants.

No. 7233.

Argued June 17, 1937.

Decided July 31, 1937.

*M. Guzman Texidor*for appellants. *G. Dominguez Rubio*for appellee.

Mr. Justice Wolf

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The incident in this case arose under the facts of case No. 7276 just decided and involved an injunction. There was an order of this Court requiring the defendant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned. The defendant Cristóbal Cruet Carrasquillo replied by saying that he thought he had filed the transcript of record and he sent it up. As the appeal in case No. 7276 has been dismissed, the question in this one has become academic and the present case should also be dismissed.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
#### Santiago Delos REYES, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 01-3069.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2001.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by' Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1), and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 81(a) within the time permitted, it is

*831ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
HomeOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism...Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti Semitism  Releases

# Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Releases

52 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing on Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Berlin, Paris, Rome, and Matera	  Philip T. ReekerJune 21, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    		Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1637


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 8, Toledo, Ohio

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone No. 8, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand Site 1 at the Port of Toledo Complex, within the 
Toledo/Sandusky Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 
64-2008, filed 12/2/2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 78289, 12/22/2008) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 8 - Site 1 is approved, subject to 
the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of August 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19673 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
- Home
- Cases Filed Against the Republic of Korea
- Cases Filed Against the United States of America

HomeU.S.-Korea FTA Investor-State Arbitrations...Cases Filed Against the United States of America

# 									Cases Filed Against the United States of America							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

        - KTurbo Inc. v. United States of America

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsLegal Adviser

Back to Top
Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

CHIEF JUSTICE

 DORI CONTRERAS

JUSTICES

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

 LETICIA HINOJOSA

 GREGORY T. PERKES

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

COURTHOUSE ANNEX III

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Monday, August 19, 2019

Hon. Inna Klein

214th District Court

901 Leopard, Room 902

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-19-00134-CR; 13-19-00135-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 18FC-4767F; 18FC-2391F

Style: Justin Jones v. The State of Texas

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed please find an order issued by this Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

Enc.

cc: Hon. Larry Christopher Iles (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Mark A. Gonzalez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Anne Lorentzen (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                       730
<INVENTORY>                                     39,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,016
<PP&E>                                          26,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,358
<BONDS>                                         14,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,784
<SALES>                                         32,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,134
<CGS>                                           23,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    46
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                       525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 00 446 CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Gupta Travels to Kenya and Rwanda

# 									Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Gupta Travels to Kenya and Rwanda							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 11, 2023

U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Dr. Geeta Rao Gupta will visit Nairobi, Kenya, and Kigali, Rwanda from July 11-20, her first international trip as Ambassador-at-Large.  While in Kenya, Ambassador Gupta will meet with representatives from the Government of Kenya on shared gender equality priorities, as well as women leaders and civil society organizations, including an implementing partner focused on women, peace, and security efforts.  The Ambassador will also visit the UNICEF-UNFPA Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting (FGM/C) in Kenya, a global program to which the U.S. proudly contributes $5 million annually.

Starting July 16, Ambassador Gupta will participate in the Women Deliver 2023 Conference, taking place in Kigali, Rwanda. The Ambassador will serve as head of the U.S. interagency delegation, comprised of representatives from the United States Agency for International Development and the Peace Corps.  The Conference will convene 6,000 participants from international civil society, government, and non-profit organizations in Kigali.  Ambassador Gupta’s participation highlights and advances the U.S. government’s gender equality policy priorities in the region and around the world, and will include a visit to a critical U.S. government program supporting adolescent girls and young women– the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe (DREAMS) program.

For media inquiries, please contact: stategwi@state.gov

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsCivil SocietyKenyaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPeaceRwandaSecurityThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefWomen's Rights

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Appointment of Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles as Head of the U.S. Mission to UNESCO

# 									Appointment of Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles as Head of the U.S. Mission to UNESCO							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 17, 2023

On July 14, 2023, Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, was appointed to represent the United States at the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as Head of the U.S. Mission.  Ambassador Barks-Ruggles most recently served as the Senior Representative and Head of Delegation to four major International Telecommunication Union conferences in 2022, culminating in the election of an American as the first female Secretary General in the organization’s 157-year history. Prior to that, Ambassador Barks-Ruggles served as Senior Bureau Official for the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Ambassador to the Republic of Rwanda, U.S. Consul General in Cape Town, Deputy to the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations, and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.

In Paris, Ambassador Barks-Ruggles will engage with UNESCO and UNESCO member states to restore the U.S. presence and leadership on a host of issues of importance and value to the American people.

For further information, please email IO-Press-DL@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of International Organization AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonUN and Related Organizations

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 44401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 15, 2009, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. A permit was issued on August 24, 2009 to: 
Charles D. Amsler, Jr., Permit No. 2010-007.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-20734 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, Plaintiff, 

### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# f\LEO FEB 11 2009 1(iRW\'\I111N(l10N, ClERK

### -y~S.**OISlP.~l** COURl

v. Civil Action

# N'09 

# 0261 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court onplaintiffs application to proceed informapauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint willbe dismissed. The Hon. Gregory Jackson, Associate Judge ofthe Superior Court ofthe District of Columbia, presided over plaintiffs criminal case. According to plaintiff, Judge Jackson had "no authority[] orjurisdiction over any charge being prosecutedbythe federal government," such that his actions were "illegal and outside hisjudicial capasity [sic]." CompI. at 3. In addition, Judge Jackson allegedly made erroneous rulings, refused to recuse himself, prevented plaintifffrom availing himselfofthe assistance ofcounsel, and imposed a lengthyprison sentence. See id. at 4- 7. Forthese alleged violations ofrights protected under the United States Constitution, plaintiff demands damages totalling $22 billion. !d. at 7. Judge Jackson enjoys absolute immunity from liability for damages for acts committed within hisjudicialjurisdiction. See Mirales v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991); Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219 (1988); Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335,20 L.Ed. 646 (1872). The prosecution of plaintiffs criminal case falls within hisjurisdiction, as the Superior Court hasjurisdiction over criminal cases under any law applicable exclusively to the District ofColumbia. See D.C. Code 

### § 11-923. In the District ofColumbia, the United States Attorney for the District ofColumbia 

# 3

### conducts criminal prosecutions in the name ofthe United States for any violation ofcriminal laws where the maximum term ofimprisonment exceeds one year. 

### See D.C. Code § 23-101. The fact that a federal prosecutorbrought charges against plaintiffdoes not deprive the Superior Court of jurisdiction. To the extent that plaintiffs claim goes to the fact ofhis confinement, he cannot recover damages in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.c. § 1983 without showing that his confinement has been invalidated by "revers[al] on direct appeal, expunge[ment] by executive order, declar[ation ofinvalidity] by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance ofawrit ofhabeas corpus." 

### Heckv. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,486-87 

### (1994); accord White v. 

### Bowie, 194 F.3d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (table). Plaintiffhas not satisfied this prerequisite and therefore fails to state a claim under Section 1983. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this date.
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 16: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 16: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 16 [1 MB]

45. Legal Brief on U.S. Right to Initiate Snapback under UNSCR 2231 (available by email by request to ldigest@state.gov)

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
#### § 560.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
HomeDSS Press Releases...‘Cinderella Story’ Takes Down Human Trafficking Network

# 									‘Cinderella Story’ Takes Down Human Trafficking Network							

DSS Releases

September 6, 2017

*Operation Cinderella Story* was a DSS-initiated and -led criminal investigation that dismantled a transnational human trafficking criminal network operating in the Republic of Korea and the New York City area.

The criminal enterprise laundered millions of dollars in illicit proceeds from secret New York City brothels catering to more than 70,000 pre-vetted customers.

Over the course of a 20-month investigation in the United States and South Korea, two DSS special agents and a forensic accountant linked a dozen conspirators to more than 150 financial accounts that controlled business operations for numerous seemingly independent brothels operating in the New York metropolitan area.

In April of 2016, the DSS New York Field Office and other federal agencies executed 10 simultaneous search warrants across three federal judicial districts in and around the New York area. With support of the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of New York, 11 targets of the investigation were indicted and arrested on 33 criminal counts, including conspiracy, money laundering, visa fraud, and violation of the Mann Act.

In addition to the 11 indictments, DSS anticipates approximately $3 million will be recovered in seized assets and fines.

DSS special agents at the regional Security Office in Seoul brokered a solid partnership during the investigation — highlighting the effectiveness of DSS’s global reach in neutralizing international criminal conspiracies.

Tags

DSS ReleasesHuman TraffickingHuman TraffickingNew YorkNorth Korea

Back to Top