alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TE CONNECTIVITY LTD.

 

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests a copy of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of shares or series thereof, and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.

 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

 

 

	
TEN COM   —
    	
as   tenants in common
    	
 
    	
UNIF   GIFT MIN ACT —
    	
Custodian
    
	
TEN   ENT —
    	
as   tenants by the entireties
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(Cust)
    	
(Minor)
    
	
JT   TEN —
    	
as joint tenants with right of   survivorship and not as tenants in common
    	
 
    	
 
    	
under   Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(State)
    


 

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

 

	
FOR VALUE RECEIVED                          hereby sell,   assign and transfer unto
    	
 
    
	
Please Insert Social Security or Other
    	
 
    
	
Identifying Number of Assignee
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE   NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE)
    


 

 

                                                                                                          Shares of the registered stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                                                                                            Attorney to transfer the said registered shares on the books of the within-named Company with full power of substitution in the premises.

 

	
Dated
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
    NOTICE: The Signature to this assignment   must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate in   every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signature(s) Guaranteed:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
THE   SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION   (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH   MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO   S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gregory P. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                            /S/ GREGORY P. HANSON, CMA
                           ------------------------------
                           Gregory P. Hanson, CMA
                           Chief Financial Officer

February 9, 2005
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29930 

05-APR-2011 

10:54 AM 

NO. SCWC-29930
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

GABRIEL APILANDO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellee
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellant
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(S.P.P. NO. 08-1-0006; CR. NOS. 01-1-0424 & 01-1-0098)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 1
 (By: Acoba, J., for the court )


The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on
 

February 18, 2011 by Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellee Gabriel
 

Apilando is hereby rejected.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 5, 2011.

 FOR THE COURT:

 /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

Associate Justice 

Jeffrey A. Hawk (Hawk Sing


Ignacio & Waters) for


petitioner/petitionerappellee on the application.
 

1
 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and
 

McKenna, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 16, 2022

No. 04-22-00109-CR

IN RE Samuel MIRELES

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On February 22, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on March 16, 2022.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of March, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CR-10686, styled State v. Mireles, pending in the 186th Judicial District 

Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's Consolidated Condensed Statement of Income and Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheet for the six-month period ended December 31, 1998,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         185,300
<SECURITIES>                                     6,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  735,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   188,700
<INVENTORY>                                    144,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,205,300
<PP&E>                                         629,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 361,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,129,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        (6,500)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     28,800  
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,000
<SALES>                                      1,356,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,000
<CGS>                                        1,271,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,271,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       25,300
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Owen Edward  Mebust

# 				 Owen Edward  Mebust			

				U.S. Military–Other/Embassy Security Operations			

Deceased				January 31, 1968			

**U.S. Government image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialVietnam

Back to Top
#### § 515.540 [Reserved]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Toloui to Travel to Costa Rica for Americas Partnership Semiconductor Workforce Symposium

# 									Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Toloui to Travel to Costa Rica for Americas Partnership Semiconductor Workforce Symposium							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 24, 2024

Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui will travel to Costa Rica January 25-26 to launch the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity Semiconductor Workforce Symposium and participate in related meetings and events.  His visit will advance commitments made during the November 2023 Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity Leaders’ Summit.  At the symposium, Assistant Secretary Toloui will affirm the U.S. commitment to working with government and private sector partners in the hemisphere to strengthen and diversify the global semiconductor supply chain and workforce.

Assistant Secretary Toloui will provide the keynote address at the symposium and conduct bilateral meetings with Costa Rican counterparts and Americas Partnership members.  He will meet with private sector leaders in the semiconductor and tech industries and experts from the education and training sector to discuss strategies to expand and diversify the semiconductor supply chain and strengthen the sector’s workforce in the hemisphere.

The Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity Semiconductor Workforce Symposium will create opportunities for member countries to explore collaborative ways to strengthen the semiconductor supply chain, including through developing workforce capacity.  Through the International Technology Security and Innovation (ITSI) Fund, part of the CHIPS Act of 2022, the Department of State is promoting the development and adoption of secure and trustworthy telecommunications networks.  ITSI also helps ensure semiconductor supply chain security and diversification through new programs and initiatives with allies and partners.

For further information, please contact the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs Media Team at EB-Press-Inquiry@state.gov.

Tags

Americas Partnership for Economic ProsperityBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCosta RicaEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyEducationOffice of the SpokespersonPublic-Private PartnershipsTrainingTravel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §2. Performance of duties in absence of director

On and after July 1, 1916, in the absence of the Director of the United States Bureau of Mines the assistant director of said bureau shall perform the duties of the director during the latter's absence, and in the absence of the Director and of the Assistant Director of the United States Bureau of Mines the Secretary of the Interior may designate some officer of said bureau to perform the duties of the director during his absence.

(July 1, 1916, ch. 209, §1, 39 Stat. 303; Ex. Ord. No. 4239, June 4, 1925; Ex. Ord. No. 6611, Feb. 22, 1934; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3174

_____________ Karilyn Bonomolo-Hagen, * * Plaintiff - Respondent, * * v. * * Appeal from the United Clay Central-Everly Community * States District Court for the School District, * Northern District of Iowa. * Defendant, * [PUBLISHED] * David Holmquist, * * Defendant - Petitioner. *

_____________ Submitted: July 21, 1997 Filed: August 15, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. The District C ourt, applying precedent from the Northern District of Iowa, and observing that our Court had not yet def initively resolved the question, held that as the plaintiff's supervisor defendant David Holmquist could be held individually liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accordingly, the District Court denied-2-

Holmquist's motion t

o dismiss the plaintiff's Title VII claims against him, but certified the q uestion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), thus permitting Holmquist to seek an interlocutory appeal. Holmquist's petition for permission to appeal is granted, and the District Court's denialof Holmquist's motion to dismiss is reversed. Our Court quite recently ha s squarely held that supervisors may n ot be held individually liable under Title VII. See Spencerv. R ipley County State Bank , No. 96-2951, slip op. at 3 (8th Cir. July 21 , 1997). Thus the qu estion left open in Lenhardt v. Basic Institute of Technology, Inc. , 55 F.3d 377 (8th Cir. 1995) (holding that under the Missouri Human Rights Ac t individual liability may not be imposed on supervisors), has been resolved. Spencer establishes the law of our circuit . We therefore reverse and remand for entry of an order granting Holmquist's motion to dismiss. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 551.507 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 551.508, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201 not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 551.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 551.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 551.507 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
#### § 548.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 548.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
#### § 548.306 Energy sector of the Belarus economy.

The term *energy sector of the Belarus economy* includes the procurement, exploration, extraction, drilling, mining, harvesting, production, refinement, liquefaction, gasification, regasification, conversion, enrichment, fabrication, manufacturing, testing, financing, distribution, or transport to, from, or involving Belarus, of petroleum, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, natural gas liquids, or petroleum products, or other products capable of producing energy, such as coal, wood, or agricultural products used to manufacture biofuels; the development, production, testing, generation, transmission, financing, or exchange of power, through any means, including nuclear, electrical, thermal, and renewable, in or involving Belarus; and any related activities, including the provision or receipt of goods, services, or technology to, from, or involving the energy sector of the Belarus economy.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BRIAN PAUL COSSEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30191

D.C. No. 9:09-cr-00009-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2016**

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Brian Paul Cossey appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

a special condition of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised 

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Cossey contends that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-30191

condition of supervised release that prohibits him from acquiring, possessing, or 

viewing materials that depict “sexually explicit conduct,” as defined in 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2256(2)(A), and deemed inappropriate by Cossey’s probation officer and sex 

offender treatment provider. We have approved a number of conditions related to 

sex offenders. However, consistent with our sister circuits, we recently held that a 

condition that extends to non-pornographic materials involving adults deprives a

defendant of more liberty than is reasonably necessary. See United States v. 

Gnirke, 775 F.3d 1155, 1165-66 (9th Cir. 2015). We, therefore, vacate the 

condition as written and remand for the district court to reimpose the condition 

consistent with Gnirke. See id. at 1166. 

VACATED and REMANDED.
#### § 576.408 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited.

Pursuant to § 576.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part.
#### § 558.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 558.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 558.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-30121

Summary Calendar

GERMAINE AMELIA THOMAS,

Plaintiff–Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:11-CV-2290

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff–Appellant Germaine Amelia Thomas appeals the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant–Appellee Social Security

Administration (SSA) in her judicial challenge to the Commissioner of Social

Security’s administrative denial of her application for supplemental security

income payments under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. On appeal,

Thomas, who is represented by counsel, alleges only that the administrative law

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 13, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-30121 Document: 00512372877 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2013
No. 13-30121

judge (ALJ) improperly weighed the opinion of a state agency medical consultant

in determining Thomas’s residual functional capacity.

Our careful review of the record reveals that Thomas nowhere made this

argument before the district court. It is familiar law that a party who wishes to

preserve an argument for appeal must raise the argument “to such a degree that

the district court has an opportunity to rule on it.”1 Because Thomas failed to

raise the argument that the ALJ improperly weighed the consultant’s opinion

in the district court, the district court had no opportunity to rule on it. 

Accordingly, Thomas’s sole argument is waived.

* * *

AFFIRMED.

1 FDIC v. Mijalis, 15 F.3d 1314, 1327 (5th Cir. 1994).

2

 Case: 13-30121 Document: 00512372877 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2013
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as amended by the Form 10-Q/A
which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes    
|Larry G. Gerdes        
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 19, 2009
#### Harold STUCKEY, Claimant-Appellant, v. Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7068.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2001.

ORDER

DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to remand this case to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for further proceedings consistent with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475,114 Stat. 2096.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The Acting Secretary’s motion to remand is granted.
#### Eugene FLOURNORY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Herboth S. RYDER, one of the Judges of the Circuit Court in and for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 74-974.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 13, 1974.

Prohibition denied.