alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,212,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,177,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,230
<INVENTORY>                                  4,554,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,243,757
<PP&E>                                       5,208,916
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,348,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,971,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,168,516
<BONDS>                                        598,172
<COMMON>                                       173,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,031,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,971,161
<SALES>                                     16,397,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,397,718
<CGS>                                        9,852,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,852,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,957,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                521,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (165,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            686,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   686,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3240

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Richard W. Whitsitt

Defendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: March 23, 2020

Filed: March 26, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Whitsitt appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking

his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his

1The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

Western District of Missouri.
counsel moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief arguing that the sentence is

substantively unreasonable. 

On review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable

sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915–18 (8th Cir. 2009)

(appellate court first ensures no significant procedural error occurred, then considers

substantive reasonableness of sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion

standard). The court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, provided

appropriate reasons for its decision, and imposed a sentence below the statutory

maximum. United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922– 24 (8th Cir. 2006)

(revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant

§ 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits

clear error of judgment); 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (maximum prison term upon

revocation is 2 years for Class C felony). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
#### § 561.406 Country with primary jurisdiction over the foreign financial institution.

For purposes of § 561.203(i) and § 561.204(f), a country includes any jurisdiction that has its own central bank or contains a separate financial sector authority, and a foreign financial institution (including its foreign branches outside of the United States) is under a country's primary jurisdiction if the foreign financial institution is organized under the laws of the country or any jurisdiction within that country.

[78 FR 16409, Mar. 15, 2013]
#### In re Samuel M. JAMES, Petitioner.

No. 662, 663.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, BRYSON and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Samuel M. James petitions for writs of mandamus to direct the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (1) to accept documents James presented in his counter-designation of record and to reject the Secretary of the Veterans Affairs’ request for exclusion of documents designated by James and, (2) to order 'a refund of $861 plus interest from January 1977.

James argues that the Secretary’s submission to the Veterans Court in opposition to his counter-designation should be rejected because it was untimely, because it contained “an outright misrepresentation,” and because the Secretary failed to contact him as required by the court’s rules. James additionally asserts that in 1977 the VA improperly deducted $1722 in disability compensation as recoupment for the amount of money he: received in disability severance pay. He argues that the VA should have deducted only one half of his severance pay, and that he therefore is owed a refund of $861, plus interest from 1977. James’s appeal remains pending before the Veterans Court.

The traditional use of the writ of mandamus in aid of appellate jurisdiction, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), “has been to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” *Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n,*319 U.S. 21, 26, 63 S.Ct. 938, 87 L.Ed. 1185 (1943). A party who seeks a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief desired, *Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Southern Dist. of Iowa,*490 U.S. 296, *881309, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable.” *Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). “Where a matter is committed to discretion, it cannot be said that a litigant’s right to a particular result is ‘clear and indisputable.’” *Id.*at 36, 101 S.Ct. 188.

After review of the petitions and the accompanying documents, we conclude that James has failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
#### § 583.313 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
#### § 570.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 570.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Apogee Robotics, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  November 18, 2008 By: /s/ Ligang Shang  Ligang Shang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
- Home
- Leadership
- Resources
- Remarks and Releases
- Assembly of Local Leaders
- Contact Us

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment...Subnational Diplomacy Unit

# Subnational Diplomacy Unit

## 				Our Mission			

					The Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy and her team lead and coordinate the State Department’s engagement with mayors, governors and other local officials in the United States and around the world. The Special Representative aims to bring the benefits of U.S. foreign policy, such as jobs, investments, innovative solutions, and international experiences, to the local and state level. It supports U.S. national security priorities by integrating local ideas into foreign policy and fostering connections among cities, municipalities, and communities in the United States and abroad.				

Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy

Ambassador Nina Hachigian

							Follow Us:																			Twitter

Back to Top
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...Celebrating 20 Years of PEPFAR

# 									Celebrating 20 Years of PEPFAR							

 

This year, the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) marks its 20th anniversary of delivering unprecedented impact in the global fight against HIV/AIDS. 

On Jan. 28, 2003, President George W. Bush announced the establishment of PEPFAR during his State of the Union Address, leveraging years of HIV/AIDS research, coordinated humanitarian effort, bipartisan support from Congress, and engagement from community and faith-based organizations, and the private sector to create an unprecedented response to a global health crisis.

Two decades later, PEPFAR supports nearly 65 million people with HIV treatment and testing services, providing more than 20 million men, women, and children with life-saving antiretroviral treatment (ART). 

To build on the program’s enduring legacy, PEPFAR is reinvigorating the U.S. global response to end the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030, creating a healthier, safer, and more secure world for all. As part of a new five-year strategy, *Fulfilling America’s Promise to End the HIV/AIDS Pandemic by 2030*,PEPFAR is advocating for and working with partners to close health equity gaps in children, adolescent girls and young women, and key populations, while achieving sustained HIV impact worldwide to combat HIV/AIDS as a security threat amid other emerging health challenges.  

After 20 years of remarkable impact, PEPFAR’s work is not yet finished.Through avid collaboration and transformative partnerships, PEPFAR is deeply committed to ending the inequities and service gaps that still stand in the way of progress so that it may advance even closer to ending the HIV/AIDS pandemic.

#### PEPFAR 20th Anniversary Resources

        - President Biden PEPFAR 20th Anniversary Video Remarks (YouTube)
        - ShareAmerica Article:  PEPFAR: 20 years of impact
        - PEPFAR Release: The US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Celebrates 20 Years of Unprecedented Global Impact in the Fight to End HIV/AIDS
        - Statement from President Joe Biden on the 20th Anniversary of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
        - Statement From Secretary Antony J. Blinken – 20th Anniversary of the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief 
        - Statement From Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong on the 20th Anniversary of PEPFAR: 20 Years of Impact
        - PEPFAR Five-year Strategy
        - PEPFAR Latest Global Results Factsheet (Dec. 2022)

Tags

Global HealthHIV/AIDSThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 375.14 Do I have to make any certifications?

By submitting a tender offering a security or securities for sale, you certify that you are in compliance with this part and the redemption operation announcement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                                           725813
<NAME>                                             Chemfab Corp.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                                      $3,376,000
<SECURITIES>                                                        $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              $21,295,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  $441,000
<INVENTORY>                                                $20,908,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           $51,437,000
<PP&E>                                                     $59,353,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             $28,860,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            $101,055,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      $21,190,000
<BONDS>                                                             $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                                         $0
<COMMON>                                                      $878,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 $76,866,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              $101,055,000
<SALES>                                                    $97,581,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           $97,581,000
<CGS>                                                      $65,958,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              $65,958,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           $19,814,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           ($82,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             $11,891,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                $3,755,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         $8,136,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                                $8,136,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
§ 552.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, such property shall no longer be deemed to be property blocked pursuant to § 552.201, unless there exists in the property another interest that is blocked pursuant to § 552.201, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, such property shall be deemed to be property in which such person has an interest and therefore blocked.
HomeGlobal Engagement Center...Global Engagement Center  Releases

# Global Engagement Center Releases

54 items

        -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		More than a Century of Antisemitism: How Successive Occupants of the Kremlin Have Used Antisemitism to Spread Disinformation and Propaganda	  January 25, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The Framework to Counter Foreign State Information Manipulation	  January 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Delegation to the Africa Cup of Nations to Strengthen People-to-People Ties	  January 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The Kremlin’s Efforts to Covertly Spread Disinformation in Latin America	  November 7, 2023 
        -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		Exporting Pro-Kremlin Disinformation: The Case of Nova Resistência in Brazil	  October 19, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment	  September 28, 2023 
        -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment	  September 28, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy and Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center Rubin’s Travel to Moldova and Latvia	  September 15, 2023 
        -    		The Kremlin’s War Against Ukraine’s Children	  August 24, 2023 
        -    Question 5.3: Global Disinformation  		Counter-Disinformation Literature Review	   

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, William J. Shope,
do hereby certify that I am the Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,
and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2017 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust
2017-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)       A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision.



(ii)       To
the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 9, 2018.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| | By:                       



| | Name:  | William J. Shope       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Title: | Group Vice President & 
| |        | Chief Financial Officer
§ 570.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 570.507(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201, is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 570.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (a) authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 570.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) Email (preferred method): *OFACreport@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) U.S. mail: OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 11218 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Ruben Gomez**

**- Bastida,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20

- CR

- 136

- 6

Before **Wiener, Elrod,**  and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Gomez

- Bastida has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez

- Bastida has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 21, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-11218 Document: 00516403015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/21/2022No. 21

- 11218

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-11218 Document: 00516403015 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/21/2022
Home1995 Treaties and Agreements...Chad (95-1128) – Agreement for Cooperation in the GLOBE Program

# 									Chad (95-1128) – Agreement for Cooperation in the GLOBE Program							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 28, 1995

Environment and Conservation:  GLOBE Program

Agreement signed at N’Djamena and Washington September 27 and November 28, 1995; entered into force November 28, 1995.

With Appendices.
Download Agreements						 [1 MB]

Tags

ChadEnvironmentTreaties

Back to Top