alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XR17


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Non-
Target Species Committee will meet in Seattle, WA.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 15, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Alaska Fishery Science 
Center (AFSC), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Building 4, NMNL Room, Room 
2139, Seattle, WA.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane DiCosimo, Council staff, 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The committee will receive brief updates on 
two AFSC reports on uncertainty and vulnerable species which will be 
incorporated into the action plan for amending the groundfish fishery 
management plans to address annual catch limits. The committee will 
also review action plans for revising management of BSAI skates, Bering 
Sea and Aleutian Island/Gulf of Alaska (BSAI/GOA) squid, BSAI/GOA 
octopus, BSAI/GOA shark and sculpin, and BSAI/GOA grenadier.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 
those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this 
meeting. Actions will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in this notice and any issues arising after publication of 
this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the 
Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 24, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-20689 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
§ 576.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, or as otherwise directed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 576.201(a) or § 576.201(b) shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally-insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( 3 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to this paragraph (b) may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days. If interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( c ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 576.201(a) or § 576.201(b) may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (b) or (d) of this section.
( d ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 576.201(a) or § 576.201(b) may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( e ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as chattels or real estate, or other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, the Office of Foreign Assets Control may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( f ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides immediate financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 576.201(a), nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 21, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. 1889 Bancorp MHC and 1889 Financial Services Corporation, both 
of Norwood, Massachusetts; to become a mutual bank holding company and 
stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Norwood Co-operative Bank, Norwood, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 21, 
2009.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-20559 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 23635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09933]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9102]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Frederick Leighton's Flaming June''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the object to be included in the 
exhibition ``Frederick Leighton's Flaming June,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at The Frick Collection, New York, New 
York, from on or about June 9, 2015, until on or about September 6, 
2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the imported object, contact the Office of the Legal 
Adviser, U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 
5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505, telephone (202-632-6471), or email at 
section2459@state.gov.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-09933 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
- GEC Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Technology Engagement Division
- Disarming Disinformation

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs...Global Engagement Center

# Global Engagement Center

## 				Mission & Vision			

**Mission:** To direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate U.S. Federal Government efforts to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.**Vision:** To be a data-driven body leading U.S. interagency efforts in proactively addressing foreign adversaries’ attempts to undermine U.S. interests using disinformation and propaganda.				

Special Envoy and Coordinator

James P. Rubin

## 											The Latest									

					September 28, 2023				

## How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment

		EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Every country should have the ability to tell its story to the world. However, a nation’s narrative should be based on facts and rise and fall on its own merits. The PRC employs a variety of deceptive and coercive methods as it attempts to influence the international information environment. Beijing’s information manipulation spans […]

          -  April 9, 2024							Special Representative Hachigian’s Travel to Louisville and Chattanooga						   
          -  April 4, 2024							The United States of America and Finland Sign Memorandum of Understanding to Expand Collaboration on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation						   
          -  March 15, 2024							The United States of America and the Republic of Latvia sign Memorandum of Understanding to Expand Collaboration on Countering Foreign State Information Manipulation						   
See All

Back to Top
40501.

#### ALEXANDER v. DEALERS SUPPLY COMPANY.

Decided March 17, 1964.

*Howard Moore, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

Felton, Chief Judge.

We must first construe the stipulation. It was to the effect that notice of the assignment to the plaintiff was the only question in the case. This could only mean that the question to be decided was whether the debtor had paid the amount due on the assigned contract to the assignor thereof before notice of the assignment was given to him by the assignee. If the balance sued for was still unpaid and remained due the question of notice would not be an issue because the copy of the suit would have been notice of the assignment. So the answer to the question raised is whether as a matter of law the evidence failed to show notice of the assignment of the account or con*376tract to the defendant. The evidence demands the finding that the defendant received no notice of the assignment. The fact that $650 of the original account was paid to the plaintiff instead of the assignor was indisputably explained in that the assignor directed that this specific payment be made to the plaintiff by the defendant for a specific reason, not for the reason that the account had been assigned. The only evidence tending to show notice of the assignment was a registered letter addressed to the defendant at an improper address, which was delivered to and receipted for by a person signing the receipt as agent for the defendant. The uncontradicted evidence showed that the letter was sent to the wrong address so no presumption arises that it was delivered at the right address. The uncontradicted evidence showed that the person who received the letter and receipted for it was not the agent of the defendant and that the defendant never saw the letter. There are no circumstances shown in the evidence which are inconsistent with the direct and positive testimony of otherwise unimpeached witnesses which shows the above facts. In such circumstances the trior of fact is required to accept the direct and positive testimony. This principle is so well known that we shall content ourselves with one citation. *Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta v. Haynie,*46 Ga. App. 522 (168 SE 112) and citations.

The court erred in finding for the plaintiff.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David C. WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50713.

D.C. No. CR-00-00074-MJL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument; accordingly, Wilson’s request for oral argument is denied. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David C. Wilson appeals the judgment entered by the district court following his conditional guilty plea to importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Wilson contends that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is unconstitutional following the Supreme *883Court’s decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Wilson also contends that his due process rights were violated because the government did not prove that he knew the type and quantity of the imported controlled substance. These contentions are foreclosed by our recent decisions in *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1109-10 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 960 is not facially unconstitutional), and *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002) (rejecting appellant’s argument that the government was required to prove that he knew the type and amount of the imported controlled substance).1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. All outstanding motions are denied.
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2017, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-P7 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have
the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial
Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  /s/ Leslie HaytonLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Colombia’s National Day

# 									Colombia’s National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 20, 2023

On behalf of the Government of the United States and the American people, I wish the Republic of Colombia and Colombians everywhere a glorious 213th Independence Day.

Our shared democratic values, respect for human rights, emphasis on equitable economic growth, collaboration in addressing the existential threat of climate change, and joint efforts to provide support to vulnerable migrants and refugees reflect the importance of our close partnership. The people of Colombia can continue to count on the United States as a steadfast friend as we address shared global and regional challenges.

I congratulate Colombia on 213 years of independence and wish the people of Colombia a joyous Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsColombiaDemocracyEconomic AffairsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 555.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 555.201, such property shall no longer be deemed to be property blocked pursuant to § 555.201, unless there exists in the property another interest that is blocked pursuant to § 555.201, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 555.201, such property shall be deemed to be property in which such person has an interest and therefore blocked.
#### § 584.303 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1339 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1339

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for mandatory 
  coverage of services furnished by nurse practitioners and clinical 
             nurse specialists under State medicaid plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1995

  Mr. Richardson (for himself, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Frost, Mr. McHale, Ms. 
Rivers, Mr. Vento, Mr. Minge, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Lofgren, and 
 Mr. Dellums) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for mandatory 
  coverage of services furnished by nurse practitioners and clinical 
             nurse specialists under State medicaid plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF SERVICES FURNISHED BY CERTIFIED NURSE 
              PRACTITIONERS AND CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALISTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(21) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(a)(21)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(21) services furnished by a certified nurse practitioner 
        (as defined by the Secretary) or a clinical nurse specialist 
        (as defined in subsection (t)) which the certified nurse 
        practitioner or clinical nurse specialist is legally authorized 
        to perform under State law (or the State regulatory mechanism 
        provided by State law), whether or not the certified nurse 
        practitioner or clinical nurse specialist is under the 
        supervision of, or associated with, a physician or other health 
        care provider;''.
    (b) Definition of Clinical Nurse Specialist.--Section 1905 of such 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(t) The term `clinical nurse specialist' means an individual who 
has earned a master's degree in a clinical area of nursing from an 
accredited institution and who is a registered nurse licensed to 
practice nursing in the State in which the individual furnishes 
services.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply to calendar quarters beginning on or after January 1, 1996, 
without regard to whether or not final regulations to carry out such 
amendments have been promulgated by such date.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7572** 

CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. E. DAY, Food Service Manager, N.C.C. , Defendant

– Appellee,

and

G. K. WASHINGTON,

Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv
- 01129

- TSE

- TRJ )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are no t binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court ’ s
order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Williams v. Day , No. 1:12

- cv
- 01129

- TSE

- TRJ (E.D. Va.
Nov. 26, 2012 & filed Aug. 14, 2013, entered Aug. 15, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED