alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Releases

104 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Inaugural United States-Czech Republic Cyber Dialogue	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States Releases Guidance for Online Platforms On Protecting Human Rights Defenders Online	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Growing Coalition of Governments Join the U.S. In Countering the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Efforts to Counter the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The Sixth U.S.-France Cyber Dialogue	  March 14, 2024 
        -    		Democratic Roadmap: Building Civic Resilience to the Global Digital Information Manipulation Challenge	   
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy	  March 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Second U.S.-Jordan Cyber and Digital Dialogue	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Sanctioning Members of the Intellexa Commercial Spyware Consortium	  Matthew MillerMarch 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement Endorsing Principles for 6G: Secure, Open, and Resilient by Design	  February 28, 2024 

previous page1234…11next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,886
<SECURITIES>                                       431
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,797
<PP&E>                                          33,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,814
<SALES>                                         18,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,679
<CGS>                                           10,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                       743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,469
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
#### First National Bank of Northampton, Respondent, *against*Ira E. Doying, Impleaded with Willet Bronson *et al.,*Appellant.

(Decided June 7th, 1886).

A complaint which alleges that the plaintiff is incorporated under an act of Congress, but contains no allegation as to whether it is a foreign or domestic corporation, as required by section 1775 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and which does not specifically state whether its location is within or without the state, is defective; and the defect can be taken advantage of by demurrer.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of New York affirming a judgment of that court entered upon an order overruling an amended demurrer to a complaint.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*John C.*Shaw, for appellant.

*Charles W. Wetmore,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

[Present, Allen and Bookstaver, JJ.]— The action is on a promissory note. The complaint alleges:

*"First.*That at the times hereinafter mentioned the plaintiff was, and now is, a National Banking Association incorporated and doing business under and by virtue of an act of Congress, entitled, ‘An act to provide a national currency,’ ” &c., but contains no allegation as to whether it is a foreign or domestic corporation.

For some inscrutable reason section 1775 of the Code requires this allegation in every complaint by or against a corporation.

The court below held that inasmuch as it was alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff was incorporated under the act of Congress, it was from the very nature of its incorpo*510ration a foreign corporation, and that where this was a self evident fact it added no force to the pleading to allege that it was a foreign corporation.

The difficulty with this position is that section 8343 subdivision 18 of the Code says a “ domestic corporation ” is a “ corporation created by or under the laws of the state,- or located in the state and created by or under the laws of the United States.....eyery other corporation is a foreign corporation.” Therefore a national bank is either a foreign or domestic corporation, according to its location within or without this state, and as this is not specifically stated, the complaint is defective in that particular, and this defect can be taken advantage of by demurrer *(Baker*v. *Star Printing &c. Co.,*3 Law Bull. 29; *Clegg*v. *Cramer,*N. Y. Daily Register Jan. 19th, 1886; *First Nat. Bank of Northampton*v. *Doying,*March, 1886, General Term of this court).

The judgment must therefore be reversed, but as the defect complained of could mislead no one, and the demurrer is highly technical, the plaintiff is given leave to amend its complaint in any way it may be advised within six days after the service of an order reversing the judgment on its attorneys. The costs of this appeal to abide the event of the action, and with costs of prior proceedings in the court below at the discretion of that court.

Judgment reversed, with costs as directed in the opinion.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38741-38742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16592]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225: Rechargeable Lithium 
Batteries and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 225 meeting: Rechargeable 
Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 225: Rechargeable Lithium Batteries 
and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 26-27, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339 or e-
mail jiverson@rtca.org, fax (202) 833-9434, Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes.

Agenda

Tuesday July 26, 2011

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Review of the meeting agenda.
     Review and approval of summary from the second plenary 
meeting RTCA paper no. 120-11/SC225-004.
     Review of action items.
     Review progress on requirement development from working 
group.
     Review new action items.
     Review agenda for Wednesday, July 27.

Wednesday July 27, 2011

     Review meeting agenda, other actions.
     Working Groups meeting.
     Working Group report, review progress and actions.
     Other Business.
     Establish Agenda for Fourth Plenary Meeting.
     Administrative Items (Meeting Schedule).

[[Page 38742]]

     Review all action items.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 23, 2011.
Kathy Hitt,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-16592 Filed 6-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

January 20, 2011

Mr. William P. Rourke 1200 Hwy 74 South, Suite 6 Peachtree City, GA 30269

Dear Mr. Rourke:

This letter is in re sponse to your April 21, 2009 petition fo r rulemaking to establish a new special airworthiness primary category, called “owner-maintenance” airworthiness category. You are petitioning to allow the pilo t/owner or a hired certified mechanic to perform work on the airplane. In addition, you propose to a llow a licensed mechanic or the pilot/owner to be able to sign the maintena nce release form to return the airplane to

service.

We use the following criteria to determin e which petitions for rulemaking are of sufficient priority to ini tiate a rulemaking action:

1) the immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rulemaking issues;

and 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

Based on the criteria above, we have review ed your petition and determined that you have not raised a safety concern and our limited rulemaking resources are being applied to critical safety regulations, some of wh ich were recently mandated by Congress through legislation.

Your petition for rulemaking re lates to certification standard s found in Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 21 and ma intenance regulations found in 14 CFR part 43. As proposed in your petition, a new categor y of aircraft that includes maintenance requirements would essentially in terrupt the structure and distinction that currently exists between certification and opera ting regulations. In additi on, we believe that existing certification standards (14 CFR part 21) address the issuance of special airworthiness certificates for new, imported, standard, and other aircraft, and further rulemaking on this subject is not warranted.2 Our maintenance regulations (14 CFR part 43) and more specifically § 43.3, concerns persons authorized to perform maintenan ce, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and alterations on aircraft. Section 43.3(g) se ts forth provisions for pilots performing preventive maintenance; while paragraph (f) provides for persons authorized to approve

aircraft for return to serv ice after preventive maintenance has been performed under paragraph (g). The amendment you request would allow individuals other than certificated mechanics to perform maintenance in flight critical areas of the aircraft and to sign a maintenance release form to return the aircraft to service. The FAA has

determined that these actions would not be in the public interest and would not enhance safety -- two important areas that must be substantiated before the FAA could undertake rulemaking.

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 33701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is hereby denied.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
#### § 560.705 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a federal district court.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that to the undersigned's knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report"), which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.





/s/ Lance CornellLance CornellChief Financial Officer


Date: May 9, 2011
# Office of Global Criminal Justice Releases

72 items

        -    Video Remarks  		Video Remarks on the Signing of an E.O. the War and Economic Crimes Court for Liberia	  Beth Van SchaackMay 6, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote  		Liberian Songs Amplify Calls for Justice Across West Africa	  Beth Van SchaackApril 12, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for the ASIL 2024 Annual Meeting Panel: “More than a Prosecutor: Honoring Benjamin Ferencz and the Interconnectedness of International Law”	  Beth Van SchaackApril 5, 2024ASIL 2024 Annual Meeting PanelWashington, DC 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks for “Restoring Justice for Ukraine” Conference	  Beth Van SchaackApril 2, 2024The Hague 
        -    		David Mandel-Anthony	  March 28, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at Ukraine House Women’s History Month Event	  Beth Van SchaackMarch 27, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Embassy Release  		Open Letter to the People of Liberia from U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice Beth Van Schaack	  Beth Van SchaackMarch 21, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at Opening of Joint ECOWAS/Gambia Technical Committee	  Beth Van SchaackFebruary 29, 2024Banjul, The Gambia 
        -    Remarks  		Keynote Address on the Legacy of the Special Court for Sierra Leone	  Beth Van SchaackFebruary 26, 2024Freetown, Sierra Leone 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks to the Helsinki Commission: “Holding Russia Accountable for War Crimes Against Ukraine: Lessons from Nuremberg”	  Beth Van SchaackFebruary 20, 2024Helsinki Commission Field HearingNuremberg, Germany 

123…8next page

Back to Top
#### § 547.305 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest*, when used with respect to property (e.g., “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2641

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for appointment of United

States marshals by the Director of the United States Marshals Service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for appointment of United States marshals by the Director

of the United States Marshals Service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Mar5 shals Service Improvement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENTS OF MARSHALS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 37 of title 28, United

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) in section 561(c)—
2

•HR 2641 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘The President shall ap2 point, by and with the advice and consent of the

3 Senate,’’ and inserting ‘‘The Director shall ap4 point’’; and

5 (B) by inserting ‘‘United States marshals

6 shall be appointed subject to the provisions of

7 title 5 governing appointments in the competi8 tive civil service, and shall be paid in accord9 ance with the provisions of chapter 51 and sub10 chapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating

11 to classification and pay rates.’’ after the first

12 sentence;

13 (2) by striking subsection (d) of section 561;

14 (3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g),

15 (h), and (i) of section 561 as subsections (d), (e),

16 (f), (g), and (h), respectively; and

17 (4) by striking section 562.

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

19 at the beginning of chapter 37 of title 28, United States

20 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section

21 562.
3

•HR 2641 IH

1 SEC. 3. TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS; PRESIDENTIAL AP2 POINTMENT OF CERTAIN UNITED STATES

3 MARSHALS.

4 (a) INCUMBENT MARSHALS.—Notwithstanding the

5 amendments made by this Act, each marshal appointed

6 under chapter 37 of title 28, United States Code, before

7 the date of the enactment of this Act shall, unless that

8 marshal resigns or is removed by the President, continue

9 to perform the duties of that office until the expiration

10 of that marshal’s term and the appointment of a succes11 sor.

12 (b) VACANCIES AFTER ENACTMENT.—Notwithstand13 ing the amendments made by this Act, with respect to the

14 first vacancy which occurs in the office of United States

15 marshal in any district, during the period beginning on

16 the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on De17 cember 31, 1999, the President shall appoint, by and with

18 the advice and consent of the Senate, a marshal to fill

19 that vacancy for a term of 4 years. Any marshal appointed

20 by the President under this subsection shall, unless that

21 marshal resigns or is removed from office by the Presi22 dent, continue to perform the duties of that office after

23 the end of the four-year term to which such marshal was

24 appointed or until a successor is appointed.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2019

No. 04-19-00443-CV

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Peter REININGER,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-21617

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief 

is due on or before January 3, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
NO. 12-10-00183-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

'

EX PARTE: JAMES WESLEY SHERRILL , ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR

'

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant James Wesley Sherrill attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his 

application for writ of habeas corpus. 

On June 17, 2010, this court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 37.2, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a 

final judgment or other appealable order. Appellant was further informed that the appeal 

would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or 

before July 19, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. That deadline has now passed, 

and Appellant has not furnished this court with a final judgment or other appealable 

order. 

Without a final judgment or other appealable order, this court has no jurisdiction 

of the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.1, 42.3.

Opinion delivered July 21, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Order filed June 23, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00436

- CV

____________ IRMA MEDRANO AND JUA N ROMERO , Appellant s
V.
STRESSFREE PROPERTY SOLUTIONS & THOMAS B ARKER, Appellee s

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1061296



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 11, 2015. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant s ha ve established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant s are ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before July 8, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant sfail to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2623 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2623

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
make the provisions and benefits of Indian self-determination contracts 
             applicable to Indian self-governance compacts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 1995

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
make the provisions and benefits of Indian self-determination contracts 
             applicable to Indian self-governance compacts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 403 of the 
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 
458cc) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) Incorporation of Title I Provisions.-- For the purposes of 
the following sections of title I of this Act, the term `contract' also 
includes agreements authorized by this title and title III: 5(f)(1), 
7(b), 7(c), 8, 102(d), 103, 104, 105(a)(3), 105(f), 105(k), 105(n) (at 
the election of, and subject to any phase-in period established by, any 
compact tribe, or any consortium of tribes that is a party to an annual 
funding agreement, in Alaska), 106(a), 106(b), 106(d), 106(e), 106(f), 
106(j), 106(k), 106(m), 106(n), 110 and 111; and subsections (b)(5), 
(b)(6)(B)(iii), (b)(7)(A), (b)(8) (D) through (G), (b)(9), and (b)(10) 
of section 1 of the model agreement set forth in section 108(c).''.
                                 <all>
```