alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-4742

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus KEVIN CONWAY, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-00-19) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: July 10, 2001 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Conway’s plea agreement included an appeal waiver provision. However, because this provision was not discussed at his FederalRule of Criminal Procedure 11 hearing and there is no other indication in the record that Conway understood the full significance of the waiver, we find that he did not waive his right to appeal. United States v. Marin , 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). 2 PER CURIAM: Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kevin Conway, Jr., pled guilty to one count of aggravated sexual abuse of a child, in violation of18 U.S.C.A. § 2242(2) (West 2000), and one count of theft of personal property of a value greater than $1000, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 661 (West 2000). The district court sentenced Conway to 218 months in prison. Conway appeals, * challenging his sentence onthat ground that the district court erred in determining his criminal history category by relying on information in the presentence investigation report concerning his juvenile adjudications. We find that Conway has had a fair opportunity to challenge the information concerning his juvenile record in the presentence report and has failed to show that the information was incorrect. Consequently, we affirm his sentence. United States v. Inglesi , 988 F.2d 500, 502 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20361]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of a Public Meeting of the State Advisory 
Committee Chairs of the Southern Region of the U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the State 
Advisory Committee Chairs of the Southern Region of the Commission will 
convene on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 at 1 p.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 7 p.m. at Atlanta Marriott Marquis, 265 Peachtree Center 
Ave., Atlanta, Georgia. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss a 
region wide fact-finding activity for 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 9, 2009. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., 
Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Peter Minarik, Regional 
Director, Southern Regional Office, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 
for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech 
disabilities or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51213c383f3023383a1124223232237f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e1e0307000f1c07052e1b1d0d0d1c40090118">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 19, 2009.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-20361 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Guadalupe FAJARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-56024.

D.C. No. CV-98-01209-WBE.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2001 *.

Decided Feb. 12, 2001.

Before D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Guadalupe Fajardo appeals the district court’s summary judgment order upholding the denial of her claim for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits based on disability. We review the judgment of the district court de novo. *Fair v. Bowen, 885*F.2d 597, 601 (9th Cir.1989). We must affirm the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) if they are free from legal error and supported by substantial evidence. *Curry v. Sullivan,*925 F.2d 1127, 1129 (9th Cir.1990).

The ALJ provided seventeen specific reasons for finding that Fajardo’s impairments were nonsevere. He relied on the opinions of three separate physicians who concluded that Fajardo retained the capacity to perform work-related activity. Although Fajardo’s treating physician concluded otherwise, “[wjhere the medical testimony is conflicting, ... it is the ALJ’s role to determine credibility and to resolve *350the conflict. If the evidence admits of more than one rational interpretation, we must uphold the decision of the ALJ.” *Allen v. Heckler,*749 F.2d 577, 579 (9th Cir.1984) [citations omitted]. The ALJ also noted Fajardo’s continued ability to attend appointments, to manage her own finances, and to perform household duties. The ability to perform such activities may be seen as inconsistent with the presence of a condition which would preclude all work activity. *Fair,*885 F.2d at 604. Finally, the ALJ determined that Fajardo’s allegations of limitation were not credible.

Because the ALJ’s reasons for rejecting the opinion of Fajardo’s treating physician were specific, legitimate, and supported by substantial evidence in the record, we affirm the ALJ’s finding of a nonsevere impairment. *See Miller v. Heckler,*770 F.2d 845, 849 (9th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts in this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7532
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY THEODORE FONVILLE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-7-F, CA-95-96-7-F) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Theodore Fonville, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Boyce, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fonville , Nos. CR-92-7-F; CA-95-96-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-16492

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cv-01732-VMC-TBM

NORIS BABB, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 24, 2020)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case: 16-16492 Date Filed: 04/24/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, NEWSOM and SILER,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Dr. Noris Babb appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on 

each of her claims in this case, which she raises under Title VII of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. 

Consistent with—and for the reasons stated in—our previous opinion, see 

Babb v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 743 F. App’x 280 (11th Cir. 2018), we 

affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Babb’s Title VII 

retaliation claim and hostile-work-environment claim, and we reverse and remand

the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Babb’s Title VII genderdiscrimination claim. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in this case,

however, see Babb v. Wilkie, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), we now reverse the district 

court’s grant of summary judgment on Babb’s ADEA age-discrimination claim 

and remand for consideration consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

* Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by 

designation.

Case: 16-16492 Date Filed: 04/24/2020 Page: 2 of 2
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0901
  doi:10.3000/19770901.C_2012.040.ell |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 40 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 55ό έτος11 Φεβρουαρίου 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0901

doi:10.3000/19770901.C_2012.040.ell

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 40

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

55ό έτος11 Φεβρουαρίου 2012

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Απόφαση | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

2012/C 040/01

Απόφαση

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

| 11.2.2012 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 40/1

---

ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ

2012/C 40/01

Ο ΓΕΝΙΚΟΣ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΕΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ,

Έχοντας υπόψη τον κανονισμό υπηρεσιακής κατάστασης των υπαλλήλων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης καθώς και το καθεστώς που εφαρμόζεται στο λοιπό προσωπικό της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, όπως καθορίστηκαν από τον κανονισμό (ΕΟΚ, Ευρατόμ, ΕΚΑΧ) αριθ. 259/68 του Συμβουλίου και τροποποιήθηκαν τελευταία με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ) αριθ. 723/2004 του Συμβουλίου, και ιδίως το άρθρο 30 του εν λόγω κανονισμού,

Έχοντας υπόψη την απόφαση του προεδρείου σχετικά με τον ορισμό της αρμόδιας για τους διορισμούς αρχή, η οποία τροποποιήθηκε για τελευταία φορά στις 26 Οκτωβρίου 2004,

Έχοντας υπόψη τις προκηρύξεις γενικών διαγωνισμών:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, Α/94, Α/95, Α/96, ΑD/1/08, ΑD/3/08, ΑD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, ΡΕ/69/S, ΡΕ/96/S, ΡΕ/110/S,

Έχοντας υπόψη τη γνωμοδότηση την οποία εξέδωσε η επιτροπή ίσης εκπροσώπησης κατά τη συνεδρίασή της της 26ης Οκτωβρίου 2011,

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΙΖΕΙ:

Άρθρο μόνο

Η διάρκεια ισχύος των πινάκων επιτυχόντων των γενικών διαγωνισμών αριθ.:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, Α/94, Α/95, Α/96, ΑD/1/08, ΑD/3/08, ΑD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, ΡΕ/69/S, ΡΕ/96/S, ΡΕ/110/S

παρατείνεται έως τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2012.

Λουξεμβούργο, 18 Δεκεμβρίου 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Γενικός Γραμματέας

---
HomeBureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation  Releases

# Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation Releases

280 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing with Senior State Department Official On Recent U.S. Engagement in Vienna Regarding the JCPOA	  April 21, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Government of Japan’s Announcement on Fukushima Treated Water Release Decision	  Ned PriceApril 12, 2021 
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing With Senior State Department Official On Recent U.S. Engagement in Vienna Regarding the JCPOA	  April 9, 2021Via Teleconference 
        -    DipNote: Arms Control and Nonproliferation  		Recognizing the Women in International Security Committed to Keeping Our World Safe	  March 29, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		First-Ever West Africa Joint Ops Exercise Links Counterterrorism Investigators in Three Nations	  March 26, 2021 
        -    Speech  		Reaffirming and Reimagining America’s Alliances	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 24, 2021NATO Headquarters AgoraBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at a Moderated Conversation with Rosa Balfour	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 23, 2021NATO HeadquartersBrussels, Belgium 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Extended “Troika” on Peaceful Settlement in Afghanistan	  March 18, 2021 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Izumi Oguri of Nippon TV	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 17, 2021Chief of Mission ResidenceTokyo, Japan 
        -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi, and Japanese Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 16, 2021Iikura Guest HouseTokyo, Japan 

previous page1…232425262728next page

Back to Top
§ 535.414 Payments to blocked accounts under § 535.508. ( a ) Section 535.508 does not authorize any transfer from a blocked account within the United States to an account held by any bank outside the United States or any other payment into a blocked account outside the United States.
( b ) Section 535.508 only authorizes payment into a blocked account held by a domestic bank as defined by § 535.320.
[44 FR 67617, Nov. 26, 1979]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
D AVEY LEE HODGES , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1221 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 000322

- A
STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/
Decision filed August 8 , 2 023 Appeal from the Circuit Cour t f or Sumt er County , Mary Hatcher, Judge.
Christina La M aida, of

S tevens & L a Maida PLLC, Dad e City, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, J r., A ssistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. MAKAR, BOATWRIGHT and PRATT , JJ ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      16,174,484
<SECURITIES>                                 3,208,593
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,663,939
<PP&E>                                         437,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,938,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,495,334
<BONDS>                                     10,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    38,856,261
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,938,355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,535
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,091,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,895,031)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,895,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.32 Submission of transaction requests; further information.

Transaction requests and requests for forms and information may be submitted to any Federal Reserve Bank currently serving as a Treasury Retail Securities Site or to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Legacy Treasury Direct®, P.O. Box 426, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-0426. A list of the Federal Reserve Banks currently serving as Treasury Retail Securities Sites is available upon request to the Bureau. The Federal Reserve Banks, as fiscal agents of the United States, are authorized to perform such functions as may be delegated to them by the Department in order to carry out the provisions of this part.

[51 FR 18265, May 16, 1986, as amended at 76 FR 18064, Apr. 1, 2011]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2637 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2637

     To provide for a study of certain cross-border sources of air 
                               pollution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 1995

Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Packard, Mr. Hefner, 
 and Mr. Cunningham) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                      to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a study of certain cross-border sources of air 
                               pollution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROSS-BORDER AIR POLLUTION.

    (a) Study.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, in consultation with appropriate State and local air pollution 
control agencies, shall undertake a study of air pollution from mobile 
sources that enter the United States from other countries to determine 
the extent to which air pollution within the United States in areas 
exceeding national ambient air quality standards is attributable to 
such sources. For purposes of conducting such study the Administrator 
shall develop a verifiable model which may be used to estimate the 
amount of air pollution in various areas that is attributable to mobile 
sources that enter the United States from other countries. Modelled 
estimates and monitoring of air pollution emissions attributable to 
such sources in at least one metropolitan area near an international 
border, including the San Diego area, shall be used to test the model 
results. The study shall also utilize existing remote sensing 
technology to the extent such technology is available.
    (b) Report.-- The Administrator shall submit a report containing 
the results of the study carried out under this section to the Congress 
as soon as practical following the completion of the study, but not 
later than one year after the enactment of this Act. Such report may 
contain recommendations, including legislative recommendations, for 
addressing air pollution attributable to mobile sources entering the 
United States from other nations.
                                 <all>
```
Home1994 Treaties and Agreements...Canada (94-1115) – Memorandum of Understanding for Space Cooperation

# 									Canada (94-1115) – Memorandum of Understanding for Space Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 15, 1994

Space:  Cooperation

Memorandum of Understanding signed at Washington November 15, 1994; entered into force November 15, 1994. With appendix.**
Download Agreements						 [9 MB]

Tags

CanadaTreaties

Back to Top