alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Public Law 468]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ468.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2027]]

Public Law 106-468
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To authorize the Attorney General to provide <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 
 2000 -  [H.R. 2780]>> grants for organizations to find missing adults.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in <<NOTE: Kristen's Act.>> Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 14661 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Kristen's Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR THE ASSISTANCE OF ORGANIZATIONS TO <<NOTE: 42 USC 
            14665.>>  FIND MISSING ADULTS.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General may make grants to public 
agencies or nonprofit private organizations, or combinations thereof, 
for programs--
            (1) to assist law enforcement and families in locating 
        missing adults;
            (2) to maintain a national, interconnected database for the 
        purpose of tracking missing adults who are determined by law 
        enforcement to be endangered due to age, diminished mental 
        capacity, or the circumstances of disappearance, when foul play 
        is suspected or circumstances are unknown;
            (3) to maintain statistical information of adults reported 
        as missing;
            (4) to provide informational resources and referrals to 
        families of missing adults;
            (5) to assist in public notification and victim advocacy 
        related to missing adults; and
            (6) to establish and maintain a national clearinghouse for 
        missing adults.

    (b) Regulations.--The Attorney General may make such rules and 
regulations as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

[[Page 114 STAT. 2028]]

SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 42 USC 14665 note.>> AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$1,000,000 each year for fiscal years 2001 through 2004.

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2780:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 19, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
The Library of Congress
§ 515.406 Drafts under irrevocable letters of credit; documentary drafts. Section 515.201 prohibits the presentation, acceptance or payment of: ( a ) Drafts or other orders for payment drawn under irrevocable letters of credit issued in favor or on behalf of any designated national;
( b ) Drafts or other orders for payment, in which any designated national has on or since the “effective date” had any interest, drawn under any irrevocable letter of credit; and
( c ) Documentary drafts in which any designated national has on or since the “effective date” had any interest.
§ 542.514 Transactions related to U.S. persons residing in Syria authorized. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, individuals who are U.S. persons residing in Syria are authorized to pay their personal living expenses in Syria and to engage in other transactions, including with the Government of Syria, otherwise prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to their personal maintenance within Syria, including, but not limited to, payment of housing expenses, acquisition of goods or services for personal use, payment of taxes or fees to the Government of Syria, and purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services from the Government of Syria.
( b ) This section does not authorize: ( 1 ) Any debit to a blocked account of the Government of Syria on the books of a U.S. financial institution or to any other account blocked pursuant to § 542.201;
( 2 ) Any transaction with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201 other than the Government of Syria; or
( 3 ) Transactions or services ordinarily incident to operating or supporting a business in Syria, employment in Syria, or any new investment in Syria prohibited by § 542.206.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,727,009
<SECURITIES>                                 1,100,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,046,948
<PP&E>                                         578,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                 345,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,374,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,454,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    54,615,574
<OTHER-SE>                                (43,695,398)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,374,273
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,289,094
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,717,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,970,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,399,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,399,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,399,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
Devany, Dennis (aSn 

From: Keith Howe [howek@westelcom.com] 


Sent: ~. Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:29 PM 


To: . Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: keep ccape air 


r () f ! 

, -.-. Dennis, '. f ..",~ .. ~ ;;,~, 

I won't go into any detail as I am sure you have heard all the points made to keep Cape Air. To lose the frequency and 

reliability of flights with Cape Air justdoesn't make any economic or practical sense at all. Three flights a day allows for 

shorter layovers in Boston head9ingto the next destination~ Going to a bigger airline will increase costs and decrease 

daily flight frequency. The flight is less than an hour so comfort is not really an issue here. 

As a lifelong resident and business man here in Plattsburgh lam respectfully requesting the decision to drop Cape Air be 

reversed. 

Thank you, 

Keith L. Howe 

1
HomePeople...Christopher Robinson

# 				Christopher Robinson			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs												

				July 2, 2018 -									July 29, 2022							

**Christopher Robinson's term ended on July 29, 2022.** Christopher Robinson is a career Foreign Service Officer with over 23 years of experience as a diplomat. He currently serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.Chris most recently was Minister Counselor for Political Affairs at U.S. Embassy Moscow, Russia. He also has served as Deputy Director for Russian Affairs at the State Department, as Political Counselor at the U.S. Mission to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna, Austria, and as Political Counselor in Managua, Nicaragua. His previous assignments have included Iraq, Belarus, Canada, Russia, and assignments in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs and the Bureau of European Affairs. He holds multiple State Department Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards. He speaks Russian and Spanish.Chris received an M.S. in strategic studies from the National War College and a B.A. in international affairs from the George Washington University.
Tags
Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 20, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY M. ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. WARDEN DAVID PARKER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 11-6091 (D.C. No. 5:10-CV-00498-W) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Before LUCERO , ANDERSON , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges.
An Oklahoma jury convicted Bobby M. Ellis of first-degree rape, lewd molestation, and preparing child pornography, a result the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. After unsuccessfully seeking state post-conviction relief, Mr. Ellis eventually filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court, however, dismissed Mr. Ellis’s petition after determining it was untimely, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and that none of the potential grounds for statutory or equitable tolling of the limitations period could save the petition.- 2 - Seeking to appeal that dismissal, Mr. Ellis asked the district court for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), which the court denied. Now before this court, Mr. Ellis renews his request for a COA. We may issue a COA only if the petitioner makes a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). And where, as here, the district court dismisses a § 2254 petition on procedural grounds, we may issue a COA only if “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). We conclude, however, that no reasonable jurist would debate the district court’s holding that Mr. Ellis’s petition is time-barred, and for substantially the same reasons given by the district court. Accordingly, we deny Mr. Ellis’s application for a COA and dismiss this appeal. We also deny his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                      Exhibit 27
                                                                      ----------

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         72,450
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               72,450
<PP&E>                                         105,013,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                 32,899,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,603,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,186,001
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,688,925<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   72,603,466
<SALES>                                        14,324,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,324,315
<CGS>                                          5,343,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,343,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,244,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,645,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (638,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (638,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (638,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (11.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.11)
<FN>
-------------------------
(F1)  Comprised of Partners' contributed capital of $48,818,997 less accumulated
      losses of $33,130,072
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 3701-091]

On August 7, 2009, Tieton Hydropower, LLC (transferor) and Southern California Public Power Authority (transferee) filed an application for transfer of license of the Tieton Dam Project, located on the Tieton River in Yakima County, Washington.

Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the Tieton Dam from the transferors to the transferees.

*Applicant Contact:*                     Transferor: Mr. Chad Ross, Tieton Hydropower, LLC, 925 Fairgrounds Road, Goldendale, WA 98620, Phone (509) 773-5650. Transferee: Mr. Richard M. Helgeson, Southern California Public Power Authority, 225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 1410, Pasadena, CA 91101, phone (626) 793-9364.                

*FERC Contact:*                     Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.                

*Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene:*                     30 days from the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)(2008) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​filing-comments.asp.*                     More information about this project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​elibrary.asp.*                     Enter the docket number (P-3701-091) in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-20238 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
U. S. Department of Homeland Security

 Office for Domestic Preparedness

 Washington, D.C. 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 98 January 26, 2004

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Exercise Managers

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

All State Homeland Security Directors

FROM: C. Suzanne Mencer

Director

SUBJECT: Regional Training on Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program -

Volume II: Exercise Evaluation.

At the meeting with State Exercise and Training Managers on January 15-16, 2004, ODP

provided an overview of the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) and

a schedule for regional training sessions to provide more in depth training on the HSEEP

Exercise Evaluation and Improvement approach. The training is 2 1/2 days and is designed to

provide the participants with an understanding of how to design and implement evaluations of

threat- and performance-based exercises as described in HSEEP Volume II: Exercise Evaluation

and Improvement

The HSEEP approach includes:

• A focus on performance of critical tasks

• The use of uniform evaluation tools (Exercise Evaluation Guides included in HSEEP)

• Enhanced data analysis

• An exercise debriefing for key officials

• Development of a written Improvement Plan

• Tracking of implementation of the Improvement Plan

We invite you put together a team of up to 10 people who will attend the training together. In

putting together a team who will take the lead in implementation of the HSEEP exercise

evaluation approach, you may want to consider including the following:

• State Administrative Agency (SAA) Exercise Manager

• SAA Grant Manager

• Other SAA representatives

• Representatives from other state agencies that administer funds for and/or are major

players in coordinated state exercises, such as Public Health, National Guard, State

Police.
• Exercise managers from selected local jurisdictions such as an Urban Area Security

Initiative site or other large jurisdiction.

Attached is the list of sessions and the states that have been assigned to each. The training will

start at 8:00 on the first day listed and will end by noon on the third day. A copy of the agenda is

attached. Also attached is a registration form that should be used to provide information on the

individual team members. Exercise or training funds from the ODP grants may be used to pay

for the travel costs associated with attendance at these regional trainings.

Please submit your registration form via email to Michael.Bonenfant@dhs.gov. at least 2 weeks

prior to the start of the training (1 week for Miami and New Orleans sessions) or fax it to 202-

353-3369. Also please make your hotel reservations directly with the hotel as soon as possible.

Ask for conference rate for "Homeland Security Evaluation Training". Questions regarding this

training may be addressed to your ODP exercise manager or contact Pat Malak, Division

Director for Policy and Evaluation at 202-616-3461.
§ 560.550 Certain noncommercial, personal remittances to or from Iran authorized. ( a ) In cases in which the transfer involves a noncommercial, personal remittance, the transfer of funds to or from Iran or for or on behalf of an individual ordinarily resident in Iran, other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211, is authorized, provided that the transfer is processed by a United States depository institution or a United States registered broker or dealer in securities and not by any other U.S. person; does not involve debiting or crediting an Iranian account; and is not by, to, or through the Government of Iran, as defined in § 560.304.
( b ) Noncommercial, personal remittances do not include charitable donations to or for the benefit of an entity or funds transfers for use in supporting or operating a business, including a family-owned enterprise. Note to paragraph ( b
) of § 560.550 :
Charitable donations of funds to or for the benefit of an entity in Iran require a specific license.
( c ) The transferring institutions identified in paragraph (a) of this section may rely on the originator of a funds transfer with regard to compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, provided that the transferring institution does not know or have reason to know that the funds transfer is not in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) An individual who is a U.S. person is authorized to carry funds as a noncommercial, personal remittance, as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, to an individual in Iran or ordinarily resident in Iran, other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211, provided that the individual who is a U.S. person is carrying the funds on his or her behalf, but not on behalf of another person.
Opinion issued January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00387-CV

———————————

MICHAEL PARKINSON, Appellant

V.

SHINOBU PARKINSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 70903

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Parkinson, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 

(requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing 

requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
2

§§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order 

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of 

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) 

(listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject 

to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing 

enforcement of rule), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.