alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.524 Financial hardship. Financial hardship may be deemed to exist when the debtor needs substantially all of his or her current and anticipated income and liquid assets to meet current and anticipated ordinary and necessary living expenses during the projected period of collection. Financial hardship will not be found to exist when the debtor merely establishes that the repayment causes a financial burden, *i.e.*, when it is inconvenient to repay the debt. If there are anticipated changes in income or expenses that would allow for the recovery of the overpayment at a later date, the Department may suspend collection action until a future date. ( a ) *Considerations.* Pertinent considerations in determining whether recovery would cause financial hardship include the following: ( 1 ) The debtor's financial ability to pay at the time collection is scheduled to be made, and
( 2 ) Income to other family member(s), if such member's ordinary and necessary living expenses are included in expenses reported by the debtor.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.46 May I purchase definitive Series EE savings bonds over-the-counter?

Effective January 1, 2012, Treasury discontinued the over-the-counter sale of definitive Series EE savings bonds.

[76 FR 66855, Oct. 28, 2011]
#### § 515.404 Transactions between principal and agent.

A transaction between any person within the United States and any principal, agent, home office, branch, or correspondent, outside the United States of such person is a transaction prohibited by § 515.201 to the same extent as if the parties to the transaction were in no way affiliated or associated with each other.
#### § 579.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,034,471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,818,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,694,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,818,215
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (37,721)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (504,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 555.314 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, money services businesses, operators of credit card systems, trust companies, insurance companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
- Office Home
- Our Website

HomeBureaus & OfficesOffice of the Historian...Office Home

# Office of the Historian

					Foreign Service Institute					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of the Historian is responsible, under law, for the preparation and publication of the official documentary history of U.S. foreign policy in the "Foreign Relations of the United States" series. Published since 1861, the series contains documents from numerous government agencies that reveal how U.S. foreign policy was created and executed at the highest levels. Additionally, the Office prepares policy-supportive historical studies, helps train Department personnel through historical components taught in Foreign Service Institute courses, and answers historical research questions from scholars, educators, students, journalists, and other agencies. The Office’s website, history.state.gov, includes a full text archive of the "Foreign Relations" series, as well as numerous publications and datasets on the Department’s institutional history and the history of U.S. foreign relations.				

Director, Office of the Historian

Adam Howard

							Follow Us:																			Twitter

Back to Top
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Joseph I. Black to Charles S. McGay for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term].

(Decided. December 9th, 1884).

The assignee in a general assignment for benefit of creditors should not be allowed to bid at a sale of property of the assigned estate, merely because he makes claim against the estate, of an indebtedness to himself, which is disputed by the assignor, and the validity and amount of which have not been determined.

Application by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors for leave to bid at a sale of property of the assigned estate.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Allen, J.

The question upon this motion is whether the assignee should be allowed to bid at a sale of certain property of the assigned estate. The doctrine of the general disability of a trustee to become a purchaser at a sale of the trust estate has been well settled. The rule laid down on that subject in the case of *Davoue*v. *Fanning*(3 Johns. Ch. 252), has been followed in every case from the date of that decision to the present time. The only *22case in this state on the subject of the removal of this disability appears to be *De Caters*v. *De Chaumont*(2 Paige 490). In that case it was held that if the trustee has a personal interest in the sale, which may be sacrificed if he is not allowed to become a bidder, the court will substitute in his place a master or another trustee, if it can be done without injury to the *cestui que trust.*Here the assignee claims that the assigned estate is indebted to him. The indebtedness is disputed by the assignor. The personal interest of the assignee in the sale is therefore based upon a claim against the estate, the validity and amount of which have not yet been determined. I think a very strong case should be presented for the relaxation of the rale. I do not think the papers here present such a case. When the claim of the assignee has been passed upon and the amount of it determined, he may renew the motion if he so desires.

The present application must be denied, without costs.
#### § 100.6 Destroyed paper currency.

No relief will be granted on account of lawfully held paper currency which has been totally destroyed.
#### Fullerton et ux. v. Fullerton et al.

*Brooks, Curtze & Gent,*for petitioners.

*Charles A. Mertens,*p. p., master in partition.

December 21, 1953.

Evans, P. J.,

We have before us for consideration the first and final account of Charles A. Mertens, master in partition, showing receipts and disbursements together with a proposed schedule of distribution in the above entitled matter.

Ray B. Fullerton and Florence W. Fullerton, his wife, seek an order reducing the distributive shares of various legatees and heirs in an amount necessary *608to defray the funeral expenses of Ernest A. Fullerton who, prior to his death, was owner of a life estate, and partial owner of the fee in real estate sold by the master in partition.

It is admitted that the funeral director did not enter suit on his claim within a year following the death of Ernest A. Fullerton, and for that reason there was no lien on his interest in the realty at the time of the master’s deed. Contention is made, however, that this claim is allowable out of the proceeds of Ernest A. Fullerton’s interest nevertheless. With this, we do not agree. At the death of Ernest A. Fullerton, his interest vested in his heirs subject only to any debts which might be secured by the entry of suit for the same within one year.

As stated above, no suit was entered so these partition proceedings did not involve an interest of Ernest

A. Fullerton, but the interest of his heirs, now free of any obligations which might have been due from Ernest A. Fullerton. We are of the opinion that there is a moral obligation but it is not one enforcible at law.

Also before us are additional bills for advertising, sending of notices,, service of papers and additional bond charge. These are proper charges and will be allowed.

*Order*

And now, December 21, 1953, the petition of Ray B. Fullerton, filed June 10,1953, seeking an order for payment of funeral bill of Ernest A. Fullerton out of proceeds for distribution by the master, is refused. The petitions for allowance of payment for further legal expenses required by law are allowable as follows: Charles A. Mertens, $24.60; Ray B. Fullerton, $77.00. The master is directed to restate his account in accordance with this opinion.
2005 VT 10

#### In re John M. RUGGIERO, Esq.

[869 A.2d 117]

No. 05-002

January 5, 2005.

¶ 1. The respondent, John M. Ruggiero, is a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of Vermont. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have stipulated that the Court may suspend respondent’s license to practice law on an interim basis pending the final disposition of disciplinary counsel’s investigation and any resulting disciplinary proceedings. Having reviewed the parties’ filings, the Court concludes that they sufficiently establish that respondent has violated the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct and presently poses a substantial threat of harm to the public. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 18(B) of Administrative Order 9, and based on the parties’ stipulation, the Court ORDERS:

> 1. That respondent’s license to practice law is immediately suspended on an interim basis pending the final disposition of disciplinary counsel’s investigation and any disciplinary proceedings resulting therefrom;

> *6232. That respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Rule 23 of Administrative Order 9;

> 3. That by January 10, 2005, respondent shall provide Teresa P. DeYoung, through her attorney James Dumont, with a full accounting of all funds that he has received from the Estate of Betty DeYoung on behalf of the children of Teresa P. DeYoung;

> 4. That respondent shall not transfer or cause to be transferred, withdraw or cause to be withdrawn, or take any other action that affects client funds in the trust, escrow, and bank accounts maintained by respondent without the express approval of a court of the State of Vermont, with advance notice to disciplinary counsel;

> 5. That respondent shall provide disciplinary counsel with the names and addresses of all current clients no later than January 10,2005;

> 6. That respondent shall submit to a full financial audit of his firm’s operating, trust, escrow, closing and bank accounts. Said audit shall be conducted by a Certified Public Accountant chosen by disciplinary counsel;

> 7. That attorneys John Kennelly and John Webber are appointed to protect the interests, financial and otherwise, of respondent’s clients.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2017, by and amongCITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor andAsset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administratorand DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-P7 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00690

- CV

IN RE ESTATE OF ALVILDA M. AGUILAR, DECEASED

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Te xas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2802

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Michael Aguilar’s brief was December 16, 2013

. Neither the brief nor a

motion for extension of time was filed.

We ORDER appellant to file, on or before January 20, 2014

, h is appellant ’ s brief and a

written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. If appellant fails to file

a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we may dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c)

.

____________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8 th day of January, 2014

.

____________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### BANKBOSTON (GUERNSEY) LIMITED, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. Donald C. SCHUPAK, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant.

No. 00-7993.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 20, 2001.

Leonard Benowich, Roosevelt, Arfa & Benowich, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Howard B. Levi, Levi Lubarsky & Feigenbaum, N.Y., NY, for appellee.

Present KEARSE, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

*88*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Jones’s Opinion and Order dated April 18, 2000.

We have considered all of appellant’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
PUBLIC LAW 106–360—OCT. 27, 2000 114 STAT. 1399

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 34:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–471 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 146 (2000): Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Oct. 12, House concurred in Senate amendments.

Æ

Public Law 106–360

106th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections to a map

relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAPS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall, before

the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment

of this Act, make such corrections to the map described in subsection

(b) as are necessary to ensure that depictions of areas on that

map are consistent with the depictions of areas appearing on the

map entitled ‘‘Amendments to the Coastal Barrier Resources

System’’, dated June 5, 2000.

(b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this subsection

is the map that—

(1) is included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier

Resources System’’, dated November 2, 1994; and

(2) relates to unit P19–P of the Coastal Barrier Resources

System.

(c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the

map described in subsection (b) on file and available for public

inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier

Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Approved October 27, 2000.

Deadline.

16 USC 3503

note.

Oct. 27, 2000

[H.R. 34]
www.gpo.gov

#### Chapter Referred to in Other Sections

This chapter is referred to in section 191 of this title; title 10 section 7439.
#### § 552.304 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support,* as used in this part, means any property, tangible or intangible, including currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this definition means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.
#### § 570.801 Procedures.

For license application procedures and procedures relating to amendments, modifications, or revocations of licenses; administrative decisions; rulemaking; and requests for documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a), see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter.
§ 560.533 Brokering sales of agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices. ( a ) *General license for brokering sales by U.S. persons.* United States persons are authorized to provide brokerage services on behalf of U.S. persons for the sale and exportation or reexportation by U.S. persons of agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices, provided that the sale and exportation or reexportation is authorized, as applicable, by a one-year specific license issued pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of § 560.530 or by one of the general licenses set forth in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of § 560.530.
( b ) *Specific licensing for brokering sales by non-U.S. persons of agricultural commodities.* Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to permit U.S. persons to provide brokerage services on behalf of non-U.S., non-Iranian persons for the sale and exportation or reexportation of agricultural commodities to the Government of Iran, entities in Iran, or individuals in Iran. Specific licenses issued pursuant to this section will authorize the brokering only of sales that are to purchasers permitted pursuant to § 560.530. Note to paragraph ( b
) of § 560.533 :
Requests for specific licenses to provide brokerage services under this paragraph must include all of the information described in § 560.530(c).
( c ) *No debits or credits to Iranian accounts on the books of U.S. depository institutions.* Payment for any brokerage fee earned pursuant to this section may not involve debits or credits to Iranian accounts, as defined in § 560.320.
( d ) *Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.* Attention is drawn to the recordkeeping, retention, and reporting requirements of §§ 501.601 and 501.602 of this chapter.
[77 FR 64666, Oct. 22, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 18995, Apr. 7, 2014]