alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1021

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to increase the

voting consumer representation of the Blood Products Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1995

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. MEEK, of Florida,

Mr. STEARNS, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. FURSE, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mrs. FOWLER, and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services

to increase the voting consumer representation of the

Blood Products Advisory Committee of the Food and

Drug Administration, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blood Products Advi5 sory Committee Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1021 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSUMER REPRESENTATION ON THE BLOOD

2 PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

3 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall

ensure that not less than 1 4 ⁄3 of the voting members of the

5 Blood Products Advisory Committee shall be—

6 (1) individuals who have received blood prod7 ucts but not in connection with a professional or

8 commercial activity; and

9 (2) representatives of consumer organizations

10 with expertise in blood products.

Æ
AFS-16-4625-E 

February 22, 2016 

 Exemption No. 14930 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-8760 

Mr. Stephen M. Dickson 

Senior Vice President, Flight Operations 

Delta Airlines, Inc. 

1010 Delta Boulevard 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

Dear Mr. Dickson: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 14, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Delta Airlines, Inc. (Delta) for an exemption from part 121, Appendix H 

Level C Training and Checking Permitted, subparagraphs 2b, 3b, and 3c and § 61.157 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Delta to use 

Level C simulators for pilot in command (PIC) initial and upgrade training and checking and 

reduces the upgrade/transition pilot experience requirements of part 121, Appendix H. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Delta. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 5400 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that as indicated in your petition, Delta had been operating under Exemption No. 5400
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51007 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. RO D O LFO H ER N AN D EZ- RO D RI G U EZ , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 1 : 0 8 - CR- 2 1 0 - ALL B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent R odol f o H erna n dezR odri gu ez ha s m oved f or l eave t o w i t h draw an d has f i l ed a bri ef

i n accor da n ce w i t h A n d ers v. C alif ornia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . H erna n dez-R odri gu ez ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of th e record an d coun sel ’ s bri ef di scl oses n o non f

ri vo lou s i ssue f

or app eal . A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
HomeGlobal Engagement Center...Global Engagement Center  Releases

# Global Engagement Center Releases

54 items

        -    		Technology Engagement Remarks	   
        -    		GEC Special Report: Russia’s Pillars of Disinformation and Propaganda	   
        -    		Global Engagement Center	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Global Engagement Center Special Report  		Pillars of Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem [PDF]	  August 31, 2020 

previous page1…456

Back to Top
l)ISMISS; Opinion tiled 1)ecdnhl)er 21, 2012

In The

(!uitrtf 41pra1!

.FiftIi 1i6trirt nf xw at Jat1a

No. 05-1.2-00510-C V

VINCE FUI)ZIE, INI)IVI1)UALLY, ANI) TN1V, LLC D/B/A TRIUNE, Appellants

V.

ANCELIA WILLIAMS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-05215

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before CThief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers

Opinion By Chief Justice Wright

By letter dated September 27. 2012. the Court questioned its jurisdiction over the appeal.

Specifically, it appears there is no final judgment. We requested appellants to file, within ten days,

a jurisdictional brief explaining how this Court hasjurisdiction over the appeal. As oftoday’s date,

appellants have not filed a jurisdictional brief.

Except in circumstances not applicable here, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals

from final judgments. See Lehrnann v. F/ar-Con Coip,, 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final

judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. Id.

Appellants are appealing the trial court’s December 20. 201] order granting the motion for

summary judgment filed by Angelia Williams. one ofseveral defendants. Although the trial court’s
order disinsscx the claims ‘dgainst Ms. \Vi II iams. appellmils clmms against the other detndants

remuin pendine. lor this reason. the judgment is not tinal and appealable. CC Ie/i,iiciiin, 39 S\V.3d

at 195 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal Par want of jurisdiction. See TEx. R. A1p. P. 42.3(a).

C ARC)I ‘N \\ Rl&Ji I

(11111 JUSII(1

12951 OF,P05
nurt ni Appcahi

liftli )itrict nf rxu at Da11ai

JUDGMENT

VINCF F(J[)/IF. INDIVlD\liY. ANt)

I’IVIV. I LC D/13’A TRI (‘NE. Appellants

No. 05-12-00510-CV

ANGELIA WILLIAMS, Appellee

Appeal 1mm the 298th Judicial District Court

of Dallas County. Fexas. (Tr.Ct.No. 10—

05215).

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright,

Justices Francis and I an g -Mi e rs,

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is L)ISMISSED.

It is ORDERFI) that appellee, Angelia Williams. recover her costs of the appeal from

appellants. Vincc Fudzie. Individually, and TMV. I IC (I/h/a Triune.

Judgment entered December 21 . 201 2.

(.\ROlYN ‘v\ RI(il 11

(1 llI1 .11 s I I( F’
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Part I Modification 1. 

### 5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 

### 86 $ 10,965.00 

### Part II Modification 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 

### 86 $ 10,965.00 

### Part III Modification 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 

### 105 $ 13,387.50


### Part IV Modificaiton 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 

### 105 $ 13,387.50
$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 48,705 

### C osts covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures :**  Is the AD significant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for
either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affec t intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

I, Eyal Hen, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rekor Systems, Inc. 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: August 14, 2019   
/s/ Eyal Hen
   Eyal Hen   Chief Financial Officer   Principal Financial and Accounting Officer**
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.2


 



 


BILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS


 







Acacia Automotive, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Seller"), does hereby sell, transfer, assign and convey unto Southern Vehicle Auctions, Inc. (the "Buyer"), the Assets, Seller's interest in the Trade Name and, to the extent assignable, the License, each as defined in a certain Asset Purchase Agreement entered into by and between the Buyer and the Seller dated June 28, 2012 (the "Agreement"), in consideration of payment by the Buyer of the Purchase Price (as defined in the Agreement), the receipt and sufficiency of which the Seller does hereby acknowledge.







The terms of the Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Seller's representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and indemnities relating to the Assets, are incorporated herein by this reference.







The Seller hereby covenants that the Seller will do such further acts and execute and deliver all such transfers, assignments, conveyances, powers of attorney, and assurances reasonably requested by the Buyer, from time to time, for better conveying and confirming unto the Buyer the entire right, title and interest of the Seller in the Assets, the License and Seller's interest in the Trade Name hereby sold, transferred, assigned and conveyed to the Buyer.







It is understood that the Seller, contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Bill of Sale and Assignment of Intangible Assets, may be further executing other instruments of transfer, the purpose of which is to supplement, facilitate, or otherwise implement the transfers intended hereby.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Bill of Sale and Assignment of Intangible Assets this   31st    day of   July   , 2012, with the Effective Date of the   1st   day of   August   , 2012.












SELLER:












ACACIA AUTOMOTIVE, INC.,


  A Texas corporation







By:           /s/ Steven L. Sample                


       Steven L. Sample


       Its:  President and CEO
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2017-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 23rd day of March, 2020.

 

March 23, 2020

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlo Alberto Sisto |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Carlo Alberto Sisto     |
|   | Title: | President               |

 

----
HomeBiographies...Joe Biden

# 				Joe Biden			

															President of the United States												

				January 20, 2021 -									Present							

biography

Tags

State Department Official

Back to Top
§ 515.332 Information and informational materials. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term *information and informational materials* means: ( 1 ) Publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, news wire feeds, and other information and informational articles.
( 2 ) To be considered informational materials, artworks must be classified under Chapter subheading 9701, 9702, or 9703 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( b ) The term *information and informational materials* does not include items: ( 1 ) That would be controlled for export pursuant to section 5 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2401-2420 (1993) (the “EAA”), or section 6 of the EAA to the extent that such controls promote nonproliferation of antiterrorism policies of the United States, including “software” that is not “publicly available” as these terms are defined in 15 CFR parts 779 and 799.1 (1994); or
( 2 ) With respect to which acts are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 37.
[60 FR 39256, Aug. 2, 1995]
#### § 553.510 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.
§ 535.531 Payment of certain checks and drafts. ( a ) A bank subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is hereby authorized to make payments from blocked accounts with such banking institution of checks and drafts drawn or issued prior to the effective date, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The amount involved in any one payment, acceptance, or debit does not exceed $3000; or
( 2 ) The check or draft was within the United States in process of collection by a domestic bank on or prior to the effective date and does not exceed $50,000.
( 3 ) The authorization contained in this paragraph shall expire at the close of business on January 14, 1980.
( b ) A bank subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as its own obligation may make payment to a person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States who is the beneficiary of any letter of credit issued or confirmed by it, or on a draft accepted by it, prior to the effective date, where the letter of credit was issued or confirmed on behalf of Iran or an Iranian entity, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 535.902, no blocked account may at any time be debited in connection with such a payment.
( 2 ) Such a payment shall give the bank making payment no special priority or other right to blocked accounts it holds in the event that such blocked accounts are vested or otherwise lawfully used in connection with a settlement of claims.
( 3 ) Nothing in this paragraph prevents payment being made to the beneficiary of any draft or letter of credit or to any banking institution pursuant to § 535.904.
( c ) The office will consider on a case-by-case basis, without any commitment on its part to authorize any transaction or class of transactions, applications for specific licenses to make payments from blocked accounts of documentary drafts drawn under irrevocable letters of credit issued or confirmed by a domestic bank prior to the effective date, in favor of any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Any bank or payee submitting such an application should include data on all such letters of credit in which it is involved. Applications should be submitted not later than January 10, 1980.
( d ) Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not authorize any payment to Iran or an Iranian entity except payments into a blocked account in a domestic bank unless Iran or the Iranian entity is otherwise licensed to receive such payment.
[44 FR 75352, Dec. 19, 1979]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ELENA WHITBY a/k/a JENNIFER ROSS, JAMES CRYSTAL 

HOLDINGS, INC., JAMES CRYSTAL LICENSES, LLC, and JAMES 

CRYSTAL ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

CBS RADIO STATIONS, INC, f/k/a

INFINITY RADIO, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1717

[April 26, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Edward L. Artau, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2000-CA009360-XX0 CAF.

Robert G. Haile, Jr. of Haile, Shaw & Pfaffenberger, P.A., North Palm 

Beach, for appellants.

Alan Rosenthal and Natalie J. Carlos of Carlton Fields, Miami, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
www.gpo.gov

### §418. Inspection by Inspector General of Department of Defense

The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall—

(1) conduct, not later than three years after the effective date specified in section 1541(a) (and at six-year intervals thereafter), an inspection of the Retirement Home and the records of the Retirement Home;

(2) cause the Inspector Generals of the military departments to conduct an inspection of the Retirement Home and its records at six-year intervals alternating with the inspections by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense so that each home is inspected every three years; and

(3) submit to the Retirement Home Board, the Secretary of Defense, and Congress a report describing the results of the inspection and containing such recommendations as the Inspector General considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1518, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1730.)

#### References in Text

For the effective date specified in section 1541(a), referred to in par. (1), see Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective one year after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 1541(a) of Pub. L. 101–510, set out as a note under section 401 of this title.
#### § 570.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 570.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 570.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.
Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Dated: July 30, 2009
    /s/ Keith A. KatkinKeith A. KatkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Principal Executive Officer]