alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.15



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate
Adminstrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel Bober                                      
|Daniel Bober Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### § 587.310 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2733

To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for federally funded

employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 6, 1995

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To provide clarification in the reimbursement to States for

federally funded employees carrying out Federal programs during the lapse in appropriations between November 14, 1995, through November 19, 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF REIMBURSEMENT TO

4 STATES FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED EMPLOY5 EES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 124 of Public Law 104–

7 56 is amended by adding at the end the following new

8 subsection:
2

•HR 2733 IH

1 ‘‘(b) REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES.—If a State used

2 State funds to continue carrying out a Federal program

3 during the period beginning November 14, 1995, through

4 November 19, 1995, or if a State furloughed federally

5 funded employees carrying out a Federal program during

6 such period, the State shall be reimbursed for expenses

7 that would have been paid by the Federal Government

8 during such period had appropriations been available and

9 for expenses that the State incurs if it reimburses such

10 furloughed employees, together with interest theron as

11 provided in section 6503(d) of title 31, United States

12 Code. As used in this subsection, the term ‘State’ has the

13 meaning given such term by section 6501(9) of such

14 title.’’.

15 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Such section is fur16 ther amended by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after

17 ‘‘124.’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana In the Interest of Terri THACKER.

No. 11371.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 30, 1980.

*1051William C. Credo, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Parish of Jefferson, Gretna, for State of Louisiana.

George Troxell, 24th Judicial Dist. Indigent Defender Bd., New Orleans, for. Terri Thacker.

Jack E. Hoffstadt, New Orleans, for Mr. and Mrs. Henry Lee.

Before SAMUEL, REDMANN- and SCHOTT, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Juvenile Terri Thacker, now 16 years old, was adjudicated delinquent on the ground that she committed a simple battery. Five days before the expiration of her six-month commitment to the Department of Corrections, she was released on parole. She was thereafter charged with parole violation because she ran away from the home of her grandparents, to whom she had been released.

The record solidly justifies concern for the juvenile’s wellbeing. That concern expressly motivated the trial judge to order her committed for up to a year, and it is from that disposition that she now appeals. The problem with that best-intended disposition is that La.C.J.P. 89B disallows commitment “for a period exceeding the maximum term of imprisonment for the offense forming the basis for the adjudication.” The maximum imprisonment for simple battery is six months, R.S. 14:35, and the maximum imprisonment for parole violation is the remainder of the original sentence, R.S. 15:574.9E.

The State’s argument that R.S. 15:574.13 makes § 574.9 inapplicable to juveniles misses the point. We do not apply § 574.9 to release the juvenile as if she were an adult; we apply art. 89B to release her because § 574.9 would release an adult and art. 89B prohibits holding a juvenile longer than an adult could be held for the same offense.

Accordingly, on the charge of parole violation under our circumstances, insofar as the commitment exceeded five days it must be set aside and reduced to five days.

The evident need for society’s intervention to help this juvenile must be fulfilled, if at all, on some basis other than this petition based on parole violation as a runaway.

The disposition is amended by reducing commitment to five days, and the juvenile is ordered discharged forthwith, as soon as possible after this judgment is handed down.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2716 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2716

To extend the provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 
  to certain aliens who entered the United States without inspection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 1995

Ms. Velazquez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the provisions of the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 
  to certain aliens who entered the United States without inspection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF CHINESE STUDENT PROTECTION ACT TO CERTAIN 
              ALIENS WHO ENTERED WITHOUT INSPECTION.

    (a) In General.--Subject to this Act, the provisions of the Chinese 
Student Protection Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-404, October 9, 1992) 
shall be effective with respect to and shall apply to an alien who is 
described under subsection (b) of such Act and who was or would have 
been considered ineligible for adjustment of status under such Act by 
the Immigration and Naturalization Service because the alien entered 
the United States without inspection.
    (b) Application Period.--For purposes of the application of the 
Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 under this Act, the term 
``application period'' shall be the 90 day period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Waiver.--The requirement under section 245(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act that an alien be inspected and admitted 
or paroled into the United States to be eligible for adjustment of 
status under such section shall not apply to aliens described under 
subsection (a).
    (d) Fee.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien 
applying for adjustment of status under this Act, shall remit with such 
application a sum equalling five times the fee required for the 
processing of applications under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act as of the date of a receipt of the application.
    (e) No Offset in Number of Visas Available.--Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, when an alien is granted the status of having 
been lawfully admitted for permanent residence pursuant to this Act, 
the Secretary of State shall not be required to reduce the number of 
immigrant visas authorized to be issued under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
    (f) Applicable Provisions.--Subsection (c)(1) of the Chinese 
Student Protection Act of 1992 shall not apply to adjustment of status 
under this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 542.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges authorized. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, Internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
Note to § 542.505 :
*See* § 542.515 which authorizes, subject to certain restrictions, the operation of an account in a U.S. financial institution for an individual in Syria other than an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Bureau of Energy Resources Senior Bureau Official Kamian’s Travel to Estonia and Latvia

# 									Bureau of Energy Resources Senior Bureau Official Kamian’s Travel to Estonia and Latvia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 23, 2022

The Department of State’s Bureau of Energy Resources Senior Bureau Official (SBO) Harry Kamian will travel to Tallinn, Estonia, and Riga, Latvia, May 24-27, where he will meet with government officials and energy sector leaders to advance bilateral and commercial energy relationships.  SBO Kamian will discuss joint efforts to promote European energy security, reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian fossil fuels, and advance the clean energy transition.  He also will discuss Estonia’s and Latvia’s efforts to diversify energy suppliers and accelerate the deployment of renewable energy sources.

For further information, please contact ENR-PD-Clearances@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEstoniaLatviaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of TPG Pace Holdings Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
Date: August 26, 2019  By: 
/s/ Martin Davidson
   **Martin Davidson**   
**Chief Financial Officer**

**(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
**
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merisel, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald R. Uzzi, as
Chief Executive Officer and Victor L. Cisario as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Donald R. Uzzi


--------------------------------------


Donald R.
Uzzi


Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, and President





/s/
Victor L. Cisario


--------------------------------------


Victor L.
Cisario


Chief
Financial Officer





November
16, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the accompanying report.  A signed original copy
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Senate Hearing 110-343]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                        S. Hrg. 110-343 
 
                                [ERRATA]

REGULATORY ASPECTS OF CARBON CAPTURE, TRANSPORTATION, AND SEQUESTRATION 
=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                              COMMITTEE ON
                      ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                       ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                                   TO

    RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THE REGULATORY ASPECTS OF CARBON CAPTURE, 
   TRANSPORTATION, AND SEQUESTRATION AND TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON TWO 
  RELATED BILLS: S. 2323, A BILL TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONDUCT OF CARBON 
CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 
 PROJECTS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; AND S. 2144, A BILL TO REQUIRE THE 
 SECRETARY OF ENERGY TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY RELATING TO 
    THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF PIPELINES AND CARBON DIOXIDE 
            SEQUESTRATION FACILITIES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                               __________

                            JANUARY 31, 2008

                       Printed for the use of the
               committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                                [ERRATA]

                            S. Hrg. 110-343

    The hearing cover was printed with the incorrect year of 
``January 31, 2007''. The correct date is ``January 31, 2008''.


```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2070]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 18 / Thursday, January 29, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 5099]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2009-14 of January 16, 
                2009

                
 Waiving the Prohibition on the Use of Economic 
                Support Funds with Respect to Various Parties to the 
                Rome Statute Establishing the International Criminal 
                Court

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 671(b) of the Department of State, Foreign 
                Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
                2008 (Division J, Public Law 110-161), I hereby:



<bullet>

determine and report that it is important to the national interests of the 
United States to waive the prohibition of aforementioned section 671(a) 
with respect to Barbados, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Ecuador, Kenya, 
Mali, Mexico, Namibia, Niger, Paraguay, Peru, Samoa, South Africa, St. 
Vincent and the Grenadines, Tanzania, and Trinidad and Tobago; and



<bullet>

waive the prohibition of aforementioned section 671(a) with respect to 
these countries.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 16, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-2070
Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
HomeBiographies...Camille P.  Dawson

# 				Camille P.  Dawson			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs												

				September 7, 2021 -									Present							

Camille Dawson is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with 24 years of experience designing and implementing diplomatic and public engagement strategies for the U.S. Department of State.

She assumed the role of Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs in September 2021 with responsibility for public diplomacy as well as regional and security policy. Prior to this, she served briefly as the Public Diplomacy Fellow and Faculty Advisor at the George Washington University. From 2019 to 2021, she was Director of the Office of Public Diplomacy for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs.In previous assignments she served as Counselor for Public Affairs at U.S. Embassy Singapore where she also held the role of Acting Deputy Chief of Mission for one year (2016-2019); Africa Regional Media Hub Director in Johannesburg, South Africa (2013-2016); Outreach Unit Chief in Shanghai, China (2009-2013); Assistant Cultural Affairs Officer in Beijing, China (2005-2009); Deputy Spokesperson in Beijing, China (2003-2005); and Consular and Political Officer in Manila, Philippines (2000-2002). Camille serves as a Board Member of Executive Women at State.

Camille received her Bachelor’s degree with honors from the University of Texas and a Master of International Affairs degree with a focus on International Security Policy from Columbia University.  She speaks Mandarin Chinese and has studied Japanese, Tagalog, French, and Spanish. She is a mother of two, an advocate for diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility and an avid reader, traveler, and sports enthusiast. 

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John E. Deloach, Individually, John E. Deloach as General Partner of 

John E. Deloach Family Limited Partnership, and John E. Deloach 

Family Limited Partnership v. Stephen Stelly

Appellate case number: 01-19-00182-CV

Trial court case number: CV29534

Trial court: 253rd District Court of Chambers County

On April 8, 2022, the Supreme Court of Texas reversed this Court’s prior judgment in 

this case and remanded this case for further proceedings. In light of the Supreme Court’s 

opinion, the Court orders the parties to file additional briefing of no more than 5,000 words 

each.

The appellants’ supplemental brief is due August 29, 2022.

The appellee’s supplemental brief is due September 19, 2022. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Peter Kelly______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____August 9, 2022___
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20450 Summary Calendar

DARRE L BURDITT , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
JUDGE DANIEL LEEDY , et al.,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 1070

Before REAVLEY , DENNIS , and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Darrel Burdit t appeals the dismissal of his claims to set aside his plea of
nolo contendre to driving without a license. We AFFIRM

. Burditt filed claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against Austin County Court at Law Judge Daniel Leedy and against Assistant District

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 30, 201 4

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20450 Document: 00512820751 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2014No. 14

- 20450

Attorney Brandy Davidson in their individual cap acities

. Additional claims against District Attorney Travis Koehn in his official capacity have been abandoned on appeal

. Burditt claims the county court lacked jurisdiction to enter judg ment on his plea of nolo contendre , and that , for this reason, Leedy
and Davidson conspired to commit a fraud on the court by accepting the plea.
The Rooker

- Feldman doctrine bars federal courts from entertaining
collateral attacks on state

- court judgments. United States v. Shepherd , 23 F.3d 923, 924 (5th Cir. 1994) (discussing D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983) , and Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923) )

. Such
attacks will be considered only when a state judgment is voi d. Shepherd , 23 F.3d at 925. In Texas, a judgment is void only if the court rendering judgment lacked jurisdiction over the case

. Cook v. Cameron , 733 S.W.2d 137, 140 (Tex. 1987) (citations omitted)

. In Texas, c ounty courts have exclusive jurisdiction over “misdemeanors other than misdemeanors involving official misconduct and cases in which the highest fine that may be imposed is $500 or less.” T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE § 26.045(a). Burditt was charged with a Class B mi sdemeanor carr ying a maximum fine of $2,000. Therefore, the county court had exclusive jurisdiction over his case and properly entered judgment on his plea. Moreover, the fact that Burditt ultimately pled guilty to a Class C misdemeanor is irrelevant. S ee Jones v. State , 502 S.W.2d 771 , 774 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973). Even if it were relevant , the county court would still have had jurisdiction over Burditt’s case, although not exclusive jurisdiction. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P. art. 4.07. Because Burditt’s conv iction constituted a valid state

- court judgment,
the district court was barred from considering Burditt’s col lateral attack on that judgment and properly dismissed his claims. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-20450 Document: 00512820751 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2014