alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000702403
<NAME>                         DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1981-2

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              4,991
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      61,205
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   66,196
<PP&E>                         39,932,897
<DEPRECIATION>                 39,702,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    337,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             212,620
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                         84,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      337,364
<SALES>                           343,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  346,769
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     227,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   119,357
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               119,357
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      119,357
<EPS-BASIC>                         19.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Ecuador, Peru, and Paraguay

# 											Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Ecuador, Peru, and Paraguay									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 26, 2024

Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew will travel to Ecuador and Peru from February 27 – March 4. In both countries, he will discuss progress made, ongoing efforts, and the continuing challenges to address corruption. His visit will reinforce the U.S. commitment to fighting corruption and desire to work to identify areas for further cooperation. In Ecuador from February 27-28, Coordinator Nephew will meet with government officials, including justice sector, law enforcement, legislative representatives, and civil society. In Peru from February 29 – March 1, he will attend the APEC Anti-Corruption and Transparency Experts Working Group. He will meet separately with justice sector actors, and participate in roundtable discussions with government representatives, civil society, and the private sector.

On March 4, Coordinator Nephew will travel to Paraguay. He will meet with government representatives and engage with civil society and the private sector to discuss ongoing challenges and identify additional areas for collaboration. His visit will underscore the United States’ commitment to combatting corruption and strengthening the rule of law.

Follow @StateCGAC on Twitter to learn more.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCorruptionEcuadorOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-CorruptionOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelParaguayPeru

Back to Top
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00080-CV

K. A. V., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-FM-18-000880, THE HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant K.A.V. filed her notice of appeal on February 6, 2019. The appellate 

record was complete February 20, 2019, making appellant’s brief due March 12, 2019. On 

March 26, 2019, this Court ordered Harry Wade Deckard to file appellant’s brief no later than 

April 10, 2019. A supplemental clerk’s record containing a March 27, 2019 order appointing 

John Sigman as counsel of record was received in this Court on April 11, 2019.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing 

deadlines. Therefore, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than April 29, 2019. If 
2

the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be 

held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on April 12, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith
HomeBureaus & Offices > Office of the Chief of Protocol...Diplomatic Affairs Division

# Diplomatic Affairs Division

## 				Diplomatic Affairs Division			

					The Diplomatic Affairs Division assists the Chief of Protocol in serving as the President’s personal representative and liaison to Chiefs of Mission and Heads of Delegations in the United States. The Division is responsible for maintaining the foreign Diplomatic Corps Order of Precedence for bilateral foreign Chiefs of Mission, Heads of Delegation, and Chargés d’affaires, and the publication of the foreign Diplomatic List. The Division coordinates all activities associated with the accreditation of bilateral Chiefs of Mission, Heads of Delegation, Chargés d’affaires and Deputy Chiefs of Mission and their dependents. As part of these duties, it also oversees matters relating to privileges and immunities and issuance of the appropriate credentials for these individuals. The Division directs the agrément process for new bilateral Chiefs of Mission and Heads of Delegation, including arrivals and presentations of credentials to the President at the White House. The Diplomatic Affairs Division serves as an overall liaison for the diplomatic community and handles problems that may arise in the Department’s relations with foreign diplomatic missions. Additionally, the Division implements the Department’s oversight program for foreign domestic workers employed by foreign mission personnel, including the pre-notification process, the In-person Registration Program, and the issuance of domestic worker registration cards. In coordination with the Office of Foreign Missions, the division provides advice and assistance to diplomatic missions regarding the establishment of new missions. On matters of common concern, this advice and assistance includes other federal agencies, the Government of the District of Columbia, and state and local government authorities.				

Back to Top
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-571V

Filed: October 19, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

PHILLIP FERGUSON, * UNPUBLISHED

*

* Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

* Reasonable Amount Requested

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * to which Respondent Does Not

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Object. 

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION1

On July 7, 2014, Phillip Ferguson (“Petitioner”) petitioned for compensation under the 

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioner 

alleged that the administration of an influenza vaccine on October 2, 2013 caused him to suffer

from an allergic reaction and chronic urticaria. On August 11, 2016, the undersigned issued a 

decision awarding compensation to Petitioner pursuant to a joint stipulation of the parties.

On October 18, 2016, Petitioner filed an unopposed application for attorneys’ fees and 

 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the purposes espoused in the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44

U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). Each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any 

information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in 

substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the 

disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 

18(b).
costs. Petitioner requests compensation in the amount of $38,237.78 in attorneys’ fees and costs, 

of which none were personally incurred by Petitioner. Application for Fees and Costs at 1-2, 

docket no. 51, filed Oct. 14, 2016. Respondent has reviewed the application for fees and costs 

and does not object to the amount sought. Application for Fees and Costs at 1, docket no. 52, 

filed Oct. 16, 2016.

In accordance with the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e) (2012), the undersigned 

finds that Petitioner’s request for fees and costs is reasonable. Accordingly, the undersigned 

hereby awards the amount of $38,237.78, in the form of a check made payable jointly to 

Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Paul Brazil, of Muller Brazil, LLP. In the absence of a 

motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court shall enter 

judgment in accordance herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

 Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master

 

2 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to 

seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000381

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

MARK MALAGODI and JANET JOHNSTON,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v.

CAMERON E. NICE and MARTHA J. JACOBSEN,

aka MARTHA J. JACOBSEN-NICE,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants, and

AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.,

a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellee, and

JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20;

DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 5CCV-22-0000027)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration

and Motion for immediate Relief from Judgements [sic], filed

April 29, 2024, by self-represented Defendants/CounterclaimantsAppellants Cameron E. Nice and Martha J. Jacobsen aka Martha J.

Jacobsen-Nice (together, Nice Parties), the papers in support,

and the record, it appears that:

(1) The Nice Parties seek reconsideration of the April

26, 2024 order dismissing the motions they filed on March 25,

2024. The Nice Parties also seek "immediate relief from

judgments" and to dismiss with prejudice the complaint filed in

the underlying case, 5CCV-22-0000027; and

(2) The Nice Parties fail to demonstrate the court

overlooked or misapprehended any point of law or fact in the

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000381

03-MAY-2024

07:49 AM

Dkt. 52 ODMR
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

April 26, 2024 order. Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule

40(b). In addition, because the court dismissed this appeal for

lack of jurisdiction on June 26, 2023, it will dismiss the Nice

Parties claims for relief in the Motion for immediate Relief from

Judgements [sic].

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for

Reconsideration is denied and the Motion for immediate Relief

from Judgements [sic] is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 3, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

2
#### § 548.323 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
40453.

#### LAMB v. THE STATE.

Decided November 13, 1963

Rehearing denied December 3, 1963.

*Julian Hartridge, Sr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter C. McMillan, Jr., Solicitor General,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted and convicted of receiving stolen property. On the trial there was evidence which showed that the defendant procured the principal thieves to commit the burglary and deliver the property thus stolen to him. The defendant’s motion for new trial, based on the usual general grounds only, was overruled and error is assigned on such adverse judgment. The sole contention of the defendant is that under the evidence he was guilty of the burglary as an accessory or not guilty of any crime, but that he was not guilty of receiving stolen property. *Held:*

“Where the principal thieves are known, and where it appears the defendant had prior knowledge that the goods were to be stolen or, in some cases, aided in procuring the theft, but was not present at the initial caption and asportation, the defendant may be convicted of either [burglary or receiving stolen property] but not both crimes, at the election of the State.” *Stanley v. State,*97 Ga. App. 828 (2) (104 SE2d 591). The conviction was authorized by the evidence and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
#### § 560.526 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, David
L. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition  and
               result of operations of the Corporation.



/s/  David L. Cox
-----------------

David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer


November 13, 2006
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Elijah “Bobby” HAWKINS.

No. 66180.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 20, 1979.

In re Elijah “Bobby” Hawkins, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. East Carroll Parish. No. 19,550.

Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to conduct hearing in order to fix bail. Bail hearing previously held discloses no evidence which would warrant the refusal of bail by the trial judge.
F OR P UBLICATION



### JUDICIAL CO UNCIL O F T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

I N R E C O M P L

A I N T O F J UD I C I A L M I S C ON D U C T No. 16-90121

O RDER

F iled October 3, 2016

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief J udg e :
Complainant alleg es that the district judg e presiding over his c riminal case has acted “ w ithout lawful authority ” because the judg e, upon being sworn in, g ave a version of the judicial o ath that preceded the standard lang u ag e p r e scribed
at 28 U.S.C. § 453, as amended by the J udicial I mprovements Act of 1990. B oth the district court and t h e Ninth Circuit C o u rt of Appeals h ave previously rejected this or simil a r arguments raised by

complainant.

To the ex tent complainant alleg es that the j u d ge i m p r operly denied his motion to dismiss, based o n a “deficient” oath, these a lleg ations relate directly to the merits of the judg e’s r

uling s and must be dismissed. See 28 U .S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii); In re Charg e of Judicial Misconduct
, 685 F .2d 1226, 1227 (9th Cir. J u d. Council 1982); J udicialConduct Rule 11(c)(1)(B ).I

N R E C O M P L

A I N T O F J U D I C I AL M I S C OND U C T 2

M o reover, complainant cites no authority stating th at minor variat i o n s in the phrasing of the judicial oath may be g rounds for disqualify ing a judg e, o r could constitute misconduct. B ecause complainant fails to alleg e any conduct “prejudicial to the e f

fective and ex peditious administration o f the business of the courts,” these charg es are dismissed. See In re Complaint of

Judicial Misconduct
, 7 26 F .3d 1060, 1062 (9th Cir. J ud. Council 2013); J ud i cial-Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(A).

DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/  ROBERT ROSENKRANZ
------------------------------------

Robert Rosenkranz
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/  THOMAS W. BURGHART
------------------------------------

Thomas W. Burghart
Vice President and Treasurer

May 7, 2004
#### Billhymer *v.*Peerless Corporation.

[No. 20,480.

Filed December 16, 1965.]

*175
      *Evelyn Pitschke,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Kirkioood Yockey*and *Yockey & Yockey,*of Indianapolis, . for appellee.

Per Curiam.

On November 19, 1965 appellant filed her petition for extension of time to file transcript and assignment of error. Therein it is alleged that a motion for new trial was overruled by the trial court on *August 25, 1965.*

Thereafter on November 23, 1965 appellee filed in this court objections to the petition for extension of time and has combined therewith a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee shows that the motion for new trial was in fact overruled by the Circuit Court of Marion County on *August 10, 1965.*To these objections and this motion appellant has not replied although the record shows service of the same on appellant’s counsel by registered mail.

We are compelled to take the showing by a certified copy of the record of the Marion Circuit Court as establishing that the motion for new trial was overruled on August 10, 1965.

There have been no extensions of time granted, and no motion having been filed within the 90 day period provided by our Supreme Court Rule 2-2, this court has no jurisdiction except to sustain the objections to further extension of time and to sustain the motion to dismiss. *Taylor et al.*v. *Meskimen et al.*(1955), 234 Ind. 485, 488, 128 N. E. 2d 872; *Brindle v. Anglin*(1965), 246 Ind. 601, 208 N. E. 2d 476, 477.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 212 N. E. 2d 403.
- CPC Partnerships Home
- Colombia
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Ghana
- Jamaica
- Mongolia
- Peru
- Philippines

HomeChild Protection Compact Partnerships...Child Protection Compact Partnerships – Mongolia

# 									Child Protection Compact Partnerships – Mongolia							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## U.S.-Mongolia Child Protection Compact (CPC) Partnership (2020–2024)

On April 2, 2020, the United States and Mongolia signed the **U.S.-Mongolia Child Protection Compact Partnership**, a four-year plan developed jointly by our two countries that documents the commitment of our nations to achieve specified shared objectives related to strengthening efforts to effectively prosecute and convict child traffickers, providing comprehensive trauma-informed care for child victims of these crimes, and preventing all forms of child trafficking in Mongolia.

## Foreign Assistance Awards to Support the U.S.-Mongolia CPC Partnership

In October 2020, the TIP Office awarded funds totaling $5 million to World Vision for activities in support of the U.S.-Mongolia CPC Partnership.  World Vision, with implementation partner The Asia Foundation and local organizations the Mongolian Gender Equality Center, Talita Asia, Unbound Mongolia, and Beautiful Hearts is addressing the TIP Office’s four programming objectives as outlined in the Mongolia CPC Partnership—interagency coordination and collaboration, prosecution, protection, and prevention.  Project objectives include establishing and maintaining a Multidisciplinary Task Force under the National Sub-Council on Trafficking in Persons that will work to improve victim identification, support coordinated approaches for proactive victim-centered investigations and effective prosecutions, and address the individualized needs of trafficking victims through referrals and the provision of a comprehensive array of quality services; improving the quality of victim-centered investigations and prosecutions with the goal of increasing the number of effective prosecutions and convictions; strengthening Mongolian government and civil society capacity to identify victims of child trafficking and to provide comprehensive specialized services to victims; and increasing efforts to prevent sex trafficking and forced labor by engaging with schools, communities, and online mechanisms that educate stakeholders about child trafficking while increasing the capacity of public officials, civil society, and private sector stakeholders to take appropriate action.

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Hatchie National Wildlife Refuge
Southeast Region

| - Refuge Finder
- Service Finder
- Office Finder
- Contact Finder
- Home
- Directions  to Refuge
- Fact Sheet
- Hunt & Fish Regulations | Hatchie NWR Map
The Location: one mile south of Brownsville, TN on the south bank of 23.5 miles of the state-- designated Hatchie Scenic River. Bisected by I-40 and TN Highway 76 about 50 miles east of Memphis and 130 miles west of Nashville, TN. Headquarter's office is located at Oneal Lake, 1.5 miles North of Hwy 76 from Exit 52 or 3 miles South on Hwy 76 from Exit 56. 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Michael Chouinard,** Refuge Manager6772 Highway 76 SouthStanton, TN 38069(731) 772-0501FAX: (731) 772-7839E-mail: [email protected]

Southeast Region		    Fish & Wildlife ServiceU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Home PageDepartment of the InteriorUSA.govAbout the U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceAccessibilityPrivacyNoticesDisclaimerFOIA

|  |  |
|--|--|