alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 91-110 Hanua Street #204, Kapolei, HI 96707, has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger became effective on May 20, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: August 4, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-19390 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### § 569.308 OFAC.

The term *OFAC* means the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
#### § 570.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 



 
 CERTIFICATE NUMBER Organized Under the Laws of the State of Delaware AMOUNT Eagle
Spinco Inc. This Certifies that Shares of Common Stock, Par Value S0.001 of the above-named Company transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by its duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed. In Witness Whereof, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized Officers. this day of A.D. 20 is the owner of 








 Legend 
 This certificate evidences Common Stock representing an interest in Eagle Spinco Inc. 
 The shares
of capital stock in Eagle Spinco Inc. represented by this certificate have not been registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under any other applicable securities laws. Such shares of stock may not be sold, assigned,
pledged or otherwise disposed of at any time without effective registration under such Act and laws or, in each case, exemption therefrom.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 375.3 What is the role of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in this process? As fiscal agent of the United States, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York performs various activities necessary to conduct a redemption operation under this part. These activities may include but are not limited to: ( a ) Accepting and reviewing tenders;
( b ) Calculating redemption operation results;
( c ) Issuing notices of redemptions;
( d ) Accepting deliveries of Treasury securities at settlement; and
( e ) Processing the Treasury payment for securities delivered at settlement.
EXHIBIT 32.2 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 I, Jon S. Verbeck, Chief Financial Officer,  Acting Principal Accounting Officer, and Treasurer of OP-TECH Environmental Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: November 10, 2010
 /s/ Jon S. Verbeck
 Jon S. Verbeck
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
 Acting Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 539.802 Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994 (59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950), as amended by Executive Order 13094 of July 28, 1998 (63 FR 40803, July 30, 1998), and any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938 may be taken by the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
# Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues Releases

123 items

        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Canada	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Croatia	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Australia	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Albania	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		The JUST Act Report: Argentina	  July 29, 2020 
        -    Report  		Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today (JUST) Act Report	  July 29, 2020 
        -    		Resource Documents – Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues	   
        -    		About Us – Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues	   
        -    		Key Topics – Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues	   
        -    		Contact Us – Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues	   

previous page1…10111213next page

Back to Top
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D19-2405

Lower Tribunal No. 10-61928

________________

Mack Wells,

Appellant,

vs.

U.S. Bank, National Association, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, 

Judge.

Mack Wells, in proper person.

Blank Rome, LLP, Daniel S. Hurtes, and Nicole R. Topper (Ft. Lauderdale), 

for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 561.803 Consultations.

In implementing sections 104 and 104A of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-195) (22 U.S.C. 8501-8551), as amended by the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-158) (22 U.S.C. 8701-8795), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult with the Secretary of State and may, in the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury, consult with such other agencies and departments and such other interested parties as the Secretary considers appropriate.

[78 FR 16410, Mar. 15, 2013]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele J. Sison’s Travel to Vienna, Rome, and Ljubljana

# 									Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele J. Sison’s Travel to Vienna, Rome, and Ljubljana							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 24, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele J. Sison will travel to Vienna, Austria; Rome, Italy; and Ljubljana, Slovenia for consultations on a wide range of U.S. multilateral priorities, including the food insecurity and humanitarian needs triggered by Russia’s premeditated and unprovoked further invasion of Ukraine.

In Rome, Assistant Secretary Sison will meet with leadership from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Food Programme (WFP), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the International Development Law Organization (IDLO).  The Assistant Secretary will also consult with key partner countries to discuss humanitarian assistance coordination, climate solutions, and governance at the UN Rome-based agencies.

In Vienna, the Assistant Secretary will meet with the leadership of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO).  Her visit reinforces U.S. leadership and commitment in these important multilateral venues and the Administration’s investment in partnerships with these international organizations to advance peace and security around the world.

During her time in Ljubljana, Assistant Secretary Sison will meet with Slovenian officials to discuss shared interests at the United Nations.

For updates, follow @State_IO on Twitter.

Tags

AustriaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsFood SecurityHumanitarian AidOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSloveniaUkraine

Back to Top
#### Michael D. CHANDLER *v.*PULASKI COUNTY Arkansas

5-5065

445 S. W. 2d 96

Opinion delivered October 6, 1969

*Ben E. Price,*for appellant.

*Richard B. Adkisson,*Prosecuting Attorney; By: *James R. Howard,*for appellée.

Carretón Harris, Chief Justice.

This appeal is an effort to persuade this court to extend the rule announced in *Parish*v. *Pitts,*244 Ark. 1239, 429 S. W. 2d 45 (Rehearing denied on July 15, 1968), to permit suits in tort against counties. On the night of October 4, 1967, Michael D. Chandler, appellant herein, was a passenger in an automobile being driven to Little Rock Air Force Base from Little Rock by an out-of-state resident. After proceeding through Jacksonville, the driver turned left onto Coffelt Road, a county public highway in Pulaski County. The driver was unable to make a 90 degree turn, and crashed into a drainage ditch on the westernmost side of old Highway No. 67, Chandler receiving serious injuries. Thereafter, appellant instituted suit against Pulaski County, Arkansas, alleging negligence on the part of the county in failing to erect and maintain effective warning or luminous signs, in failing to post a safe speed limit sign along the road, and in fail*263ing to give any warning whatsoever of the existence of the 90 degree turn required of western bound travelers on said road. Pulaski County demurred to the complaint and such demurrer was sustained by the trial court. This appeal questions the correctness of that ruling.

The facts in this case are very similar to those in the case of L. A. Sullivan, Administrator, Estate of Joseph Sullivan, deceased, of Pulaski County, Arkansas, handed down this date, and the reasoning in that opinion applies here with equal force. There, we point out that the General Assembly of 1969 enacted legislation which became Act 165, the legislation declaring the public policy of the (State of Arkansas to be “that all counties, municipal corporations, school districts, special improvement districts, and all other political subdivisions of the State shall be immune from liability for damages, and no tort action shall lie against any such political subdivision, on account of the acts of their agents and employees. ’ ’

Affirmed.
- Home
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets

HomeBureaus & Offices > Under Secretary for Political Affairs...Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

# Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					Advancing an Indo-Pacific that is free and open, connected, prosperous, secure, and resilient.				

Assistant Secretary

Daniel J. Kritenbrink

							Follow Us:																			TwitterFlickr

## Countries & Areas

							East Asia and the Pacific						

        -  Australia 
        -  Brunei 
        -  Burma 
        -  Cambodia 
        -  China 
        -  Cook Islands 
        -  Fiji 
        -  Indonesia 
        -  Japan 
        -  Kiribati 
        -  Laos 
        -  Malaysia 
        -  Marshall Islands 
        -  Micronesia 
        -  Mongolia 
        -  Nauru 
        -  New Zealand 
        -  Niue 
        -  North Korea 
        -  Palau 
        -  Papua New Guinea 
        -  Philippines 
        -  Samoa 
        -  Singapore 
        -  Solomon Islands 
        -  South Korea 
        -  Taiwan 
        -  Thailand 
        -  Timor-Leste 
        -  Tonga 
        -  Tuvalu 
        -  Vanuatu 
        -  Vietnam 

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 8, 2016

p0705

Order 

Clerk

July 8, 2016

153851

In re NORGREN/ODNEAL/BLANKS, Minors. SC: 153851

COA: 329171

Oakland CC Family Division:

12-792772-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 525.302 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part, and with respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 525.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
#### §§ 515.411-515.413 [Reserved]
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protein Polymer Technologies,
        Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
        2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.



        /s/  Janis Y. Neves
        -------------------
           Janis Y. Neves
           Director of Finance and Assistant Secretary
           November 13, 2002
#### § 576.317 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM AND OPINION; 

NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTERS. 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

LAWRENCE LINDSEY, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Action No. 13-0550 (RLW) 

 ) 

 ) 

U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al., ) 

 ) 

 Respondents. ) 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 

On April 26, 2013, Lawrence Lindsey petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus 

while confined at the District of Columbia Jail on a parole violator warrant issued by the United 

States Parole Commission on January 9, 2013. See Pet’r’s Request for Relief Under Habeas 

Corpus [Dkt. # 1] at 1. In the petition, Mr. Lindsey claims that he has not received a probable 

cause hearing and, thus, should be “released back into the community.” Id. at 1-2. In response 

to the Court’s show cause order, the Commission contends that the petition should be summarily 

denied because, among other reasons, petitioner was convicted in Alexandria, Virginia, of a 

crime committed while on supervised release and, thus, is not entitled to a probable cause 

 

1 This unpublished memorandum opinion is intended solely to inform the parties and any 

reviewing court of the basis for the instant ruling, or alternatively, to assist in any potential future 

analysis of the res judicata, law of the case, or preclusive effect of the ruling. The Court has 

designated this opinion as “not intended for publication,” but this Court cannot prevent or 

prohibit the publication of this opinion in the various and sundry electronic and legal databases 

(as it is a public document), and this Court cannot prevent or prohibit the citation of this opinion 

by counsel. Cf. Fed. R. App. P. 32.1. Nonetheless, as stated in the operational handbook adopted 

by our Court of Appeals, “counsel are reminded that the Court's decision to issue an unpublished 

disposition means that the Court sees no precedential value in that disposition.” D.C. Circuit 

Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 43 (2011). 
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM AND OPINION; 

NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTERS. 

2 

hearing. United States Parole Comm’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. # 

8] at 5. 

On June 26, 2013, the Court advised petitioner about the potential consequence of 

dismissal if he failed to reply to the United States’ opposition by July 29, 2013. Order [Dkt. # 9]. 

The Court informed petitioner that “[t]he allegations of . . . an answer to an order to show cause 

in a habeas corpus proceeding, if not traversed, shall be accepted as true except to the extent that 

the judge finds from the evidence that they are not true.” 28 U.S.C. § 2248. Petitioner has 

neither replied to the Commission’s opposition nor sought additional time to do so, and the Court 

accepts as true the Commission’s documented reasons for denying the writ. Hence, the petition 

will be denied and this case will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum 

Opinion. 

 ____________________ 

ROBERT L. WILKINS 

United States District Judge 

Date: August 20, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 14, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

*1. Melissa I. Brooks and Erik K. Brooks, both of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, to join a group acting in concert with Kenneth Brooks, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (individually and as trustee of the Signature Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Minnetonka, Minnesota) and Roger Brooks, Boulder, Colorado;*                     to retain control of Signature Bancshares, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Signature Bank, Minnetonka, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 24, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-20680 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt to Travel to Argentina, Chile

# 									Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt to Travel to Argentina, Chile							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 14, 2022

U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt, will travel to Argentina and Chile from July 15-21, 2022. During her visits, Ambassador Lipstadt will engage with local Jewish communities, government officials, and civil society representatives on actionable strategies and opportunities to counter antisemitism, which is fundamental to advancing human rights.

In Argentina, Ambassador Lipstadt will participate in events commemorating the anniversary of the bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. The July 18, 1994 attack, which killed 85 people and injured hundreds more, remains one of the deadliest attacks on Jews in the last half century.

For media inquiries, please contact SEAS@state.gov and follow @StateSEAS on Twitter for trip updates.

Tags

AntisemitismArgentinaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsChileOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat AntisemitismOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top