alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROBERT ALEXANDER SIGOUIN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-17628

D.C. Nos. 1:08-cv-00323-JMS

 1:05-cr-00248-JMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Robert Alexander Sigouin appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-17628

Sigouin contends that his initial trial counsel was ineffective by failing to

adequately prepare for trial, violating attorney-client privilege, and failing to

advise him regarding sentencing issues. This contention fails because Sigouin did

not demonstrate that, but for counsel’s alleged errors, the result of the proceeding

would have been different. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 691-94

(1984). 

In addition, we reject Sigouin’s contentions that he received ineffective

assistance from standby counsel after he elected to represent himself. See Faretta

v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 834 n.46 (1975).

We construe Sigouin’s arguments regarding uncertified issues as a motion to

expand the certificate of appealability, and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R.

22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per

curiam).

AFFIRMED.
#### Harold B. BERNSON, Appellant, v. Harry J. TOWERS and Ardath Towers, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Thomas E. Sholts, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Pennsylvania Corp., Appellant, v. ELECTRIC POWER & SERVICE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 79-1600.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 10, 1980.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, Tu-tan, O’Hara & McCoy and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellant.

John H. Duhig, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review, which awards attorneys fees for the plaintiff subcontractor [Electric Power & Service, Inc.] in its suit against the contractor [Scope Construction Company] and its surety insurer [Insurance Company of North America] under the subject contractor’s performance bond, is reversed upon a holding that no final judgment on the merits was rendered by the trial court in the plaintiff’s favor, [the lawsuit was, in fact, settled between the parties] and, under the applicable law, the absence of such a final judgment precludes the award of attorneys fees herein under Sections 627.756, 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1979). *American Home Assurance Co.*v. *Keller Industries,*347 So.2d 767 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Upon this reversal, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the order under review and deny the application for attorneys fees.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHWARTZ, Judge

(specially concurring).

I agree that reversal is required by our decision in *American Home Assurance Co. v. Keller Industries, Inc.,*347 So.2d 767 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, dismissed, 360 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1978), 367 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1979). Were the issue an original one in this district, however, I would follow the contrary views well-expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Hendry in *Keller*and in the conflicting cases of *Gibson v. Walker,*380 So.2d 531 (Fla.5th DCA 1980) and *Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Palmer,*297 So.2d 96 (Fla.4th DCA 1974).
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                                                       |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Donald R.                Uzzi                           |   |   |   |   |
| Name:                Donald R.                Uzzi                         |   |   |   |   |
| Title: Chairman,                Chief Executive Officer and President |   |   |   |   |

|                                          |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Jon H. Peterson            |   |   |   |   |
| Name:                Jon H. Peterson          |   |   |   |   |
| Title:                Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...Chargé d’Affaires Mark A. Schapiro’s Commencement Address to Verdala’s Class of 2020

# 									Chargé d’Affaires Mark A. Schapiro’s Commencement Address to Verdala’s Class of 2020							

Office of Overseas Schools

June 16, 2020

Congratulations, Class of 2020! Chargé d’Affaires Mark A. Schapiro delivered a virtual commencement address to the assisted school in Malta, Verdala International School.

Tags

Malta

Back to Top
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                              Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800
Houston, TX  77002-5218                               Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for  the  year  ended December  31, 2001 for  Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1981-1 Limited Partnership.


                              //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                              RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas
March 8, 2002
#### § 535.211 Direction involving transfers by the Federal Reserve Bank concerning certain Iranian property.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is licensed, authorized, directed and compelled to transfer to its account at the Bank of England, and subsequently to transfer to accounts in the name of the Central Bank of Algeria as Escrow Agent at the Bank of England that are established pursuant to an escrow and related agreements approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, all gold bullion, together with all other assets in its custody (or the cash equivalent thereof), of Iran or its agencies, instrumentalities or controlled entities. Such transfers, and whatever further related transactions are deemed appropriate by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall be executed when and in the manner directed by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12205, 45 FR 24099; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26685; E.O. 12276, 46 FR 7913; E.O. 12279, 46 FR 7919; E.O. 12280, 46 FR 7921; E.O. 12281, 46 FR 7923; E.O. 12282, 46 FR 7925; E.O. 12283, 46 FR 7927, and E.O. 12294, 46 FR 14111)

[46 FR 14333, Feb. 26, 1981]
HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration  Releases

# Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Releases

370 items

        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Rwanda and Uganda	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refuges in South Africa and Zambia	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in South Sudan	  January 26, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Ethiopia and Kenya	  January 22, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Ensuring Our Safety and Security Through a 90-Day Suspension of the Direct Access Program for U.S.-Affiliated Iraqis	  Daniel B. SmithJanuary 22, 2021 
        -    		Sarah Cross	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2021	  October 22, 2020 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2020	  November 4, 2019 
        -    		How We Track Our Programs	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Evaluation of the Humanitarian Migrants to Israel (HMI) Program [PDF]	  March 1, 2019 

previous page1…3334353637next page

Back to Top
40427.

#### GIBBS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted and convicted under an indictment charging him with bribery. The indictment read in part as follows: “Georgia, Mitchell County: The Grand Jurors, selected, chosen and sworn for *103the County of Mitchell. ... In the name and behalf of the citizens of Georgia, charge and accuse Raymond Gibbs with the offense of Bribery for that the said accused, in the County aforesaid, on the 18th day of February in the year of our Lord, Nineteen Hundred and Sixty-Three with force and arms, unlawfully, did then and there maliciously and directly offer to give money to Lofton Glover, an Agent of the Revenue Commissioner of Georgia, Alcohol and Tax Division, an officer and employee acting for and on behalf of the State of Georgia in an official function, to induce the said Glover to do and omit to do acts in violation of his lawful duty in that the said Raymond Gibbs did offer to pay one hundred dollars per week to the said Lofton Glover, if the said Lofton Glover would allow him, the said Raymond Gibbs to make and manufacture whiskey illegally and agree not to interfere and agree not to prosecute the said Gibbs for violating the law in reference to the making and handling of whiskey contrary to the laws of said State, the good order, peace and dignity thereof.” The defendant filed several demurrers to such indictment which were overruled and after conviction a motion for new trial on the usual general grounds and several special grounds. The motion for new trial as amended was overruled and error is now assigned on the judgments adverse to the defendant on the demurrers and motion for new trial. *Held:*

Decided January 27, 1964

Rehearing denied February 11, 1964.

*Benjamin Zeesman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Maston O’Neal, Solicitor General,*contra.

1. The indictment in the language set forth above was not subject to the defendant’s general or special demurrers.

2. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case authorized the verdict of guilty and the trial court did not err in overruling the general grounds of the motion for new trial or those special grounds which were a mere amplification of the usual general grounds.

3. The remaning special grounds of the amended motion for new trial have been carefully examined and show no reversible error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and*Rmsell, *JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 10.1


August 10, 2012


Kris B. Tufto


 





Dear Kris,


On behalf of Image Sensing Systems,
Inc. (ISS), I am pleased to confirm our employment offer to you as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer reporting to the
Board of Directors. Listed below are the items related to your employment:


Starting Salary: $260,000 annually


Start Date: August 10, 2012


Annual Vacation: None


Company Benefits: Not eligible


You will be a temporary employee as
described in the ISS Employee Handbook, with the term of your employment expiring on December 31, 2012, subject to the right of
the ISS Board of Directors to terminate your employment at an earlier date, as described below.


The U.S. Immigration Reform and Control
Act requires employers to verify employment eligibility for all new hires. You will be asked to provide documentation of your identity
and of your authorization to work in the United States within three (3) days of your start date. Your employment may be contingent
on successful reference and background checks.


It is important to note that neither
this document, nor any other written and verbal communication, should be construed as creating a contract for employment or a warranty
of benefits for any particular period of time, nor does it change the “at will” employment relations between ISS and
any of its employees. This means that employees have the right to terminate the employment relationship with ISS at any time, with
or without notice, for any reason. ISS has the same right to terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without
notice, for any reason not prohibited by law.


We are excited to have you join the
team at ISS. If you are in agreement with this letter, please sign and date below and return to Becky Degendorfer, HR Manager,
on or before September 14, 2012. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Jim Bracke.





7228028v1
<PAGE>





                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxxim Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Mark S.
Sellers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 906, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Mark S. Sellers
-----------------------------------------
Mark S. Sellers
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer


10/24/02
-----------------------------------------
Date
November 19, 1999

No. 98-1828.

#### Vermont Agency of Natural Resources *v.*United States ex rel. Stevens.

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 527 U. S. 1034.] The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “Does a private person have standing under Article III to litigate claims of fraud upon the Government?” Briefs are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 30, 1999. Twenty copies of the briefs prepared under Rule 33.2 may be filed initially in order to meet the November 30 filing date. Rule 29.2 does not apply. Forty copies of the briefs prepared under Rule 33.1 are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

Statement of Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividend Requirements for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                        For the twelve months ended
                                                   December 31, 1999     December 31, 1998
                                                   -----------------     ------------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>
Net income                                               $230,653          $ 83,465
Interest expense                                          137,759            67,533
Amortization of capitalized interest                           91                --
                                                         --------          --------
Earnings before interest                                 $368,503          $150,998
                                                         --------          --------
Interest expense                                          137,759            67,533
Interest capitalized                                          952             3,636
Interest portion of rentals                                   351               150
Preferred dividends                                         3,500             3,500
                                                         --------          --------
Fixed charges and preferred stock
     dividend requirements                               $142,562          $ 74,819
                                                         --------          --------

Earnings to fixed charges and preferred
     stock dividend requirements                             2.58              2.02
                                                         --------          --------
                                                         --------          --------

</TABLE>
§ 548.312 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treas.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 548.312 .
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE OF 1934, AS AMENDED





I, Christopher A. Wright, certify that:


1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liberty Oilfield Services Inc.;


2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: March 23, 2018  By: /s/ Christopher A. Wright


Christopher A. Wright


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROCKY FUJIO TAKUSHI, individually and as Trustee of The Albert G. Takushi Revocable Living Trust dated April 11, 2007, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, a Texas lim ited partnership and DOES 1-50, Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-15211D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00189-LEKKSC
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding Subm itted October 10, 2013 * * Honolulu, Hawaii Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and CLIFTON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

# FILED
OCT 16 2013 M OLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).The district court properly dism issed Takushi’s Truth in Lending Act

(TILA) claim

because it is tim e barred. Under TILA, a borrower seeking to rescind a m ortgage loan m ust bring suit within three years of consum m ation of the loan (with one exception not relevant here). 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f). Takushi’s loan closed on Septem ber 21, 2007, but he did not file suit until February 9, 2011. That Takushi sent a notice of rescission within the three-year period is irrelevant under our decision in McOmie-Gray v. Bank of America Home Loans , 667 F.3d 1325, 1329 (9th Cir. 2012). The rule announced in McOmie-Gray applies retroactively to “all cases still open on direct review,” regardless of whether the underlying events pre-date announcem ent of the rule. Harper v. Va. Dep’t of Taxation , 509 U.S. 86, 97 (1993); see also Morales-Izquierdo v. DHS , 600 F.3d 1076, 1087–88 (9th Cir. 2010). AFFIRMED.

-2-
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to Fiji

# 									Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to Fiji							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 11, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Monica Medina is traveling to Suva, Fiji, July 11–13.  Assistant Secretary Medina will meet with regional leaders, gathering in Fiji to attend the Pacific Islands Forum, and discuss plastic pollution; illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; climate change; and the COVID-19 pandemic.  She will also meet officials from the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency to discuss the South Pacific Tuna Treaty, including how to best support the Pacific Islands region as it continues to sustainably manage its fisheries resources.

For press inquiries, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsFijiOceansOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Ex Parte Phillip Stanley HOPE. (Re: Phillip Stanley Hope v. State of Alabama).

79-857.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 19, 1980.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED-NO OPINION.

MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEAT-TY, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0030

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WELCH,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2022

04/29/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0030