alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2024

NO. 03-23-00745-CV

K. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 20, 2023. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### § 549.801 Procedures.

For license application procedures and procedures relating to amendments, modifications, or revocations of licenses; administrative decisions; rulemaking; and requests for documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a), *see* part 501, subpart E, of this chapter.
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Bulgaria (21-216) – Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation

# 									Bulgaria (21-216) – Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

February 16, 2021

Scientific and Technical Cooperation

Signed at Sofia February 16, 2021; entered into force February 16, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [942 KB]

Tags

BulgariaScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
#### Rosa E. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-56353.

D.C. No. CV-97-01611-AIJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.*

Decided Feb. 12, 2001.

*352Before D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Hernandez appeals the denial of her claim for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found, on the basis of testimony from a vocational expert (“VE”), that although Hernandez’s past work as a cloth cutter and spreader, a packer, and an assembler was precluded by her non-exertional residual functional capacity limitations, she could work as an usher, a school crossing guard, or a visual inspector. The ALJ concluded that because there were a significant number of jobs in the national economy that she could perform, Hernandez was not disabled.

Hernandez argues that the VE’s testimony conflicted with the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (“DOT”) because the suggested occupations require language skills beyond her English language capabilities. But the ALJ may rely on expert testimony that contradicts job descriptions in the DOT if the record contains persuasive evidence to support the deviation. *Johnson v. Shalala,*60 F.3d 1428, 1435. In *Johnson,*we held that testimony describing jobs available in the local rather than the national market constitutes persuasive evidence supporting a deviation from the DOT. *Id.*Here, the VE testified that an individual with Hernandez’s educational, language, and physical limitations could perform 1,507 usher jobs, 1,174 crossing guard jobs, and 9,105 visual inspector jobs in the local (Los Angeles) economy. The ALJ was entitled to rely on the testimony of the VE because, as in *Johnson,*the VE was describing jobs available in the local, rather than the national, economy.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts in this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Brunei National Day

# 									Brunei National Day							

Press Statement

Office of the Spokesperson

February 22, 2021

On behalf of American people, I congratulate the people of Brunei Darussalam on the occasion of your National Day.

The United States and Brunei have enjoyed a long-lasting and prosperous friendship since we signed our treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce and Navigation over 170 years ago.  I am proud of our exemplary cooperation which is based on our mutual desire for peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.  I look forward to working closely with your government both bilaterally and in multilateral fora, especially during Brunei’s chairmanship of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this year.  Brunei’s ASEAN chair theme of “We Care, We Prepare, We Prosper” reflects the shared interest of the United States, Brunei, and ASEAN in building back better together from the COVID-19 pandemic.  The United States welcomed the ASEAN Outlook for the Indo-Pacific and looks forward to supporting Brunei and ASEAN in realizing the organization’s goals and advancing our shared vision for the region.

Please accept our warm wishes and congratulations.

Tags

BruneiBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs...Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs 2  Releases

# Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Releases

94 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Carstens Travel to Vatican City	  September 14, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Tenth Anniversary of the Captivity of Austin Tice	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 10, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Conviction and Sentencing of U.S. Citizen Brittney Griner in Russia    	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 4, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Issuance of Executive Order on Bolstering Ongoing Efforts to Bring Hostages and Wrongfully Detained U.S. Nationals Home	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 19, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 9, 2022Ritz-Carlton Nusa DuaBali, Indonesia 
        -    Special Briefing  		Briefing with Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Karen Donfried on the Secretary’s Upcoming Travel to Germany and France	  Karen DonfriedMay 13, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  Opening Remarks Before the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2022192 Dirksen Senate Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Senior Administration Officials on the Release of Trevor Reed	  April 27, 2022Via Teleconference 
        -    Press Statement  		Release of U.S. Citizen Trevor Reed from Russia	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 27, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Rwandan Foreign Minister Biruta	  March 29, 2022 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
- Office Home

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Critical Technology Protection

# Office of Critical Technology Protection

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Critical Technology Protection develops foreign policy to protect U.S. critical technologies and to counter the malign influence and destabilizing behavior of competitive powers. The office works to implement policies that protect America’s technological and military advantage, and deny, delay, and disrupt adversaries.				

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.77 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds. ( a ) *General.* The Department of the Treasury may, in its discretion, recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a definitive savings bond that has stopped earning interest and is in the State's possession, when the State presents evidence satisfactory to Treasury that the bond has been abandoned by all persons entitled to payment under Treasury regulations. A State claiming title to a definitive savings bond as the heir to a deceased owner must comply with the requirements of subpart L of this part, and not this section. Treasury will not recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a bond that is still earning interest. Treasury also will not recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a bond that the State does not possess, or a judgment that purports to grant the State custody of a bond, but not title.
( b ) *Due process.* At a minimum, a State requesting payment under this section must demonstrate to Treasury's satisfaction that it made reasonable efforts to provide actual and constructive notice of the escheat proceeding to all persons listed on the face of the bond and all persons who may have an interest in the bond, and that those persons had an opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was entered.
( c ) *Fulfillment of obligation.* Payment to a State claiming title under this section fulfills the United States' obligations to the same extent as if payment had been made to the registered owner.
[80 FR 80265, Dec. 24, 2015]
#### § 569.311 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
HomeBiographies...Nancy Leou

# 				Nancy Leou			

															Deputy Executive Secretary						Executive Secretariat												

				May 15, 2023 -									Present							

Nancy Leou joined the Office of the Secretary of State as Deputy Executive Secretary in May 2023.  Prior to this assignment, she served as Director of the Office of Analysis for East Asia and the Pacific in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR).

Ms. Leou previously served as the Special Advisor to the Vice President for East Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific; the Deputy Director of the Office of Korean Affairs; and Director for China and Asian Economic Affairs at the National Security Council.  She has also served assignments abroad in Shanghai, Beijing, Hong Kong and Ho Chi Minh City.

Ms. Leou is a graduate of UC Berkeley, Georgetown University and the National War College.

Tags

State Department Official

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b)
Certifications




The
undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Swine
Genetics, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Swine Genetics, Inc and will be retained by China Swine Genetics, Inc,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





February
      11, 2010
            /s/ Zhenyu ShangZhenyu
      Shang (Chief Executive Officer)February
      11, 2010
            /s/ Tongyu
      ZhangTongyu
      Zhang(Chief Financial Officer)
§ 29.301 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to addresses the legal and policy issues that affect the calculation of the Federal and District of Columbia portions of benefits under subtitle A of Title XI of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Public Law 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 712-731, and 786-787 enacted August 5, 1997, as amended. ( 1 ) This subpart states general principles for the calculation of Federal Benefit Payments in cases in which the Department and the District government are both responsible for paying a portion of an employee's total retirement benefits under the Police and Firefighters Plan or the Teachers Plan.
( 2 ) This subpart provides illustrative examples of sample computations to show the application of the general principles to specific problems.
( b ) ( 1 ) This subpart applies only to benefits under the Police and Firefighters Plan or the Teachers Plan for individuals who have performed service creditable under these programs on or before June 30, 1997.
( 2 ) This subpart addresses only those issues that affect the split of fiscal responsibility for retirement benefits (that is, the calculation of Federal Benefit Payments).
( 3 ) Issues relating to determination and review of eligibility and payments, and financial management, are beyond the scope of this subpart.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to benefit calculations under the Judges Plan.
# Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Releases

4513 items

        -    Report  		Ireland	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Croatia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Iceland	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Slovakia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Serbia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Bulgaria	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Hungary	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		San Marino	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Bosnia and Herzegovina	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Greece	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…432433434435436…452next page

Back to Top
#### § 19.910 Agency.

*Agency* means any United States executive department, military department, defense agency, or any other agency of the executive branch. Other agencies of the Federal government are not considered “agencies” for the purposes of this part unless they issue regulations adopting the governmentwide Debarment and Suspension system under Executive orders 12549 and 12689.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

PURCELL BRONSON,

Appellant

v.

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE 

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAST AND 

PRESENT MEMBERS; PENNSYLVANIA

BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; 

AND PENNSYLVANIA COURTS OF 

COMMON PLEAS, IN THEIR OFFICIAL 

AND PRIVATE CAPACITY,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 EAP 2019

Appeal from the order of 

Commonwealth Court dated January 

24, 2019 at 733 MD 2018.

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: February 19, 2020

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2020, Appellant’s Application for Judicial 

Notice is GRANTED, but the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
#### Jessie B. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2281.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.

Decided Feb. 27, 2001.

Jessie B. Hayes, pro se. Joseph Park-wood Griffith, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, SC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Jessie B. Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Hayes v. Henderson,*No. CA-99-3522-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 551.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
- Office
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Programs

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs...Office of Science and Technology Cooperation

# Office of Science and Technology Cooperation

					Science					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Science and Technology Cooperation promotes and protects American scientific leadership and uses science, technology, and innovation to advance American foreign policy interests.  				

							Follow Us:																			FacebookTwitter

Back to Top
#### § 555.309 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Jones, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 911]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 24, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that consolidation of two indictments was improper is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Peters,*242 AD2d 930 [1997]; *People v McFadden,*232 AD2d 660 [1996]; *People v Minor,*49 AD2d 828 [1975]). In any event, the defendant was not prejudiced by the consolidation *(see People v Peters, supra).*

Moreover, the defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor’s summation comments denied him a fair trial are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or constituted harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]). S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Covello, JJ, concur.
### International Strategic Minerals Inventory summary report; phosphate

By: Ulrich H. KraussHenning G. SaamHelmut Schmidt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir930C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2660

AN ACT

To increase the amount authorized to be approTensas River National Wildlife Refuge. priated to the Department of the Interior for the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2660

AN ACT

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated to

the Department of the Interior for the Tensas River

National Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2660 EH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AUTHORIZED TO BE AP2 PROPRIATED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE

3 INTERIOR FOR THE TENSAS RIVER NATIONAL

4 WILDLIFE REFUGE.

5 Section 5(1) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish

6 the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved

7 June 28, 1980 (Public Law 96–285, 94 Stat. 597), as

8 amended by section 2 of Public Law 99–191 (99 Stat.

9 1327), is amended to read as follows:

10 ‘‘(1) beginning October 1, 1995, not to exceed

11 $20,000,000 to the Department of the Interior;

12 and’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.