alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Central African Republic Sanctions

# 									Central African Republic Sanctions							

-  Releases-  September 14, 2023  														Imposing Further Sanctions in Response to Russia’s Illegal War Against Ukraine																											 
-  September 14, 2023  														With Wide-Ranging New Sanctions, Treasury Targets Russian Military-Linked Elites and Industrial Base																													 
-  August 24, 2023  														U.S. Sanctions Individuals Contributing to the Recent Escalation of Conflict in the DRC																											 
-  August 24, 2023  														Treasury Targets Individuals Contributing to Increased Conflict and Instability in the Eastern DRC																													 
-  June 27, 2023  														Sanctioning Entities and Individual Connected to Wagner Group in Africa																											 
-  June 27, 2023  														Treasury Sanctions Illicit Gold Companies Funding Wagner Forces and Wagner Group Facilitator																													 
-  December 17, 2021  														Imposing Sanctions on CAR Militia Leader																											 
-  December 17, 2021  														Treasury Sanctions UPC Militia Leader in Central African Republic for Serious Human Rights Abuse																													 
-  														Department of the Treasury: Central African Republic Sanctions																													 
-  														Archive: Find releases prior to January 20, 2021																											 
 
-  Executive Orders-  May 13, 2014  														E.O. 13667; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic 																													 
 
-  Legislation-  														International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)																													 
-  														National Emergencies Act (NEA)																													 
 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsCentral African RepublicDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsSanctions

Back to Top
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., O’Brien Interest, Inc., and Shannon Wilkerson

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 2

- 00 867

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 74906

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

On November 22, 2022

, relators

, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., O’Brien Interest, Inc., and Shannon Wilkerson , filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s November 2, 2022 “Order Denying [Relators’] Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Party.” Relators allege that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to designate Jim McCord as a responsible third party in the underlying litigation.
On November 29, 2022, the Court requested a response from any real party in interest, due on or before December 19, 2022. On December 9, 2022, real party in interest, Roberto Ramirez, filed a motion to extend time to file a response, requesting that the
d eadline to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus be extended to January 18, 2023. The Court granted Ramirez’s request and extended the deadline for filing a response. On January 11, 2023, Ramirez filed a second motion to extend the deadlin e for filing a response, requesting the deadline be extended an additional seven days, making the deadline to file January 25, 2023.
The motion states the requested extension is not opposed by any party. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 10.1 (a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). Ram irez’s motion is granted . The deadline for filing a response to the petition for writ of mandamus is extended to January 25, 2023

. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _

/s/ April Farris

______________________________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 19, 2023

____
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2737

To amend section 1114 of title 18, United States Code, to extend its

protections to United States Customs Service employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. GILMAN (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 1114 of title 18, United States Code,

to extend its protections to United States Customs Service employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Customs

5 Service Employees Protection Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERV7 ICE EMPLOYEES.

8 Section 1114 of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘of the customs or’’; and
2

•HR 2737 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘any Inspector, Agent, Canine

2 Enforcement Officer, or other employee of the

3 United States Customs Service or any person assist4 ing any employee of such Service in the execution of

5 that employee’s duties,’’ before ‘‘any immigration of6 ficer’’.

Æ
§ 515.580 Global insurance policies covering individuals traveling to Cuba. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are authorized to issue or provide coverage for global health, life, or travel insurance policies for individuals ordinarily resident in a country outside of Cuba who travel to or within Cuba. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are authorized to service those policies and pay claims arising from events that occurred while the individual was traveling in, or to or from, Cuba. Note to § 515.580 :
Certain insurance-related services for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction traveling to, from, or within Cuba are authorized pursuant to § 515.560. See Note 2 to § 515.560.
[80 FR 2301, Jan. 16, 2015]
meee berererse tees Pmt ent Girt Zee ES es ty fap eae
eos

Pen mwas te Hit

BATHYMETRIC MAP

ot Wortengren, 06

b
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MATION, OCFANME AND aIMOERHENC ADWianTRA TEN
HATOHAL OCEAW BEATE
1990

AAliemank OL COnTE WNL. 20 METERS TO) AMA MAUNA EP

fates kan LOWER LOW wate

scant joo

SEUMENSOMAL Wb

GUY OF MEXICO
CHANDELEUR VALLEY

CHANDELEUR VALLEY
(N2B008BW)

BATHYMETRIC MAP LIA?
#### § 552.312 United States.

The term *United States* means the United States, its territories and possessions, and all areas under the jurisdiction or authority thereof.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Apogee Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-------------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
www.gpo.gov

### §76. Reservation of rights upon coal lands; sale of certain mining lands

Nothing in sections 71 to 75 of this title shall be construed to destroy or impair any rights which may have attached prior to the third day of March, 1873, or to authorize the sale of lands valuable for mines of gold, silver, or copper.

(R.S. §2352.)

#### Codification

R.S. §2352 derived from act Mar. 3, 1873, ch. 279, §6, 17 Stat. 608.

#### Indian Lands Excepted

See note set out under section 71 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 24, 29, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 46, 47, 102 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,947
<SECURITIES>                                       442
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,131
<PP&E>                                          33,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,883
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,536
<SALES>                                         51,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,540
<CGS>                                           29,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
# Bureau of African Affairs Releases

2676 items

        -    Report  		Tanzania	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Eritrea	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Niger	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Swaziland	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Equatorial Guinea	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sudan	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Djibouti	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Namibia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		South Sudan	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cote d’Ivoire	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…262263264265266…268next page

Back to Top
§ 578.205 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
#### § 569.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
#### Anthony ARON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John J. LAMANNA; C. Davis, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-3834.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 6, 2001.

Before DAUGHTREY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; HEYBURN, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable John G. Heyburn II, United States District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

Anthony Aron appeals a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Aron brought this habeas corpus petition alleging that the warden of the Elkton Federal Correctional Institution in Elkton, Ohio (John J. LaManna), and a hearing officer (Connie Davis), improperly revoked twenty-seven days of “good-time” credit towards his sentence and placed an incident report in his prison file.

The district court sua sponte dismissed Aron’s petition without prejudice because Aron had not exhausted his administrative remedies. Thereafter, Aron moved the district court to reconsider its judgment. The district court denied Aron’s motion.

Aron now argues that he has exhausted his administrative remedies and reasserts his claims in his timely appeal. Aron also moves the court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

This court reviews de novo a district court judgment dismissing a § 2241 habeas corpus petition. *See Charles v. Chandler,*180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999); *Robbins v. Christianson,*904 F.2d 492, 494 (9th Cir.1990).

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Aron’s petition. A federal prisoner must first exhaust his available remedies before filing a § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief. *Little v. Hopkins,*638 F.2d 953, 953-54 *233(6th Cir.1981) (per curiam). Aron has not shown that he exhausted his administrative remedies before requesting habeas relief in the district court.

Administrative remedies clearly exist, *see*28 C.F.R. § 542.10, and nothing in the record indicates that it would have been futile for Aron to pursue his administrative remedies or that those remedies would have been unable to afford him the relief he requests. *See McKart v. United States,*395 U.S. 185, 200, 89 S.Ct. 1657, 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969) (petitioner must show that the administrative remedy is inadequate or cannot provide the relief requested for exception to the exhaustion requirement to apply); *Goar v. Civiletti,*688 F.2d 27, 28-29 (6th Cir.1982). Thus, the district court properly dismissed Aron’s petition because Aron had not exhausted his administrative remedies before filing his petition in the district court.

Accordingly, we grant Aron’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07421

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07421\07421_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07421\07421_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07421\07421_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07421\07421_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07421\07421_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07421\07421_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07421\07421_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07421\07421_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07421\Certification Statement Plant ID 07421.pdf Plant certification statement

07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_2010 ICR part A map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_2010 ICR part A map2.TIF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_FGD Diagram JMSS 9.29.10 Table B-1 Scrubber System Diagram.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_FGD Diagram JMSS 9.29.10 Table B-1 Scrubber System Diagram.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_Final Stuart FGD report ICRD2-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_ODNR Pond 8 decommissioning letterICRD4-23.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07421\Supplemental Documents\07421_pond 8 closureICRD4-23.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 560.503 Exclusion from licenses.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. The Office of Foreign Assets Control also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
#### § 584.410 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked.

Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 584.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).

[82 FR 60508, Dec. 21, 2017, as amended at 87 FR 78479, Dec. 21, 2022]
#### § 578.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43170-43171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the 
Materials, Metallurgy, and Reactor Fuels Subcommittee; Notice of 
Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on the Materials, Metallurgy and Reactor 
Fuels will hold a meeting on September 23, 2009, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Commissioner's Conference Room O1F16, One White Flint North, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda 
for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, September 23, 2009--8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss the ``three-dimensional'' finite 
element analysis of the Oyster Creek drywell shell. The Subcommittee 
will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of 
the NRC staff and other interested persons regarding this matter. The 
Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Peter 
Wen, telephone: 301-415-2832, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#38685d4c5d4a166f5d5678564a5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d686b3a2b3a4f881b3b896b8a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>, five days 
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can 
be made. Thirty-five hard copies of each presentation or handout should 
be

[[Page 43171]]

provided to the Designated Federal Official 30 minutes before the 
meeting. In addition, one electronic copy of each presentation should 
be e-mailed to the Designated Federal Official 1 day before meeting. If 
an electronic copy cannot be provided within this timeframe, presenters 
should provide the Designated Federal Official with a CD containing 
each presentation at least 30 minutes before the meeting. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of 
and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the Federal 
Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 5:15 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: August 19, 2009.
Antonio F. Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-20588 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 352.10 Taxation.

The interest paid on Series HH bonds is subject to all taxes imposed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. The bonds are subject to estate, inheritance, gift, or other excise taxes, whether Federal or State, but are exempt from all taxation now or hereafter imposed on the principal or interest by any State or any local taxing authority.
#### § 583.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by this part are authorized.