alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41055

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

ARMANDO MARAVILLA-BRISENO, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:16-CR-240-1 

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando MaravillaBriseno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maravilla-Briseno has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 11, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41055 Document: 00513948455 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2017
No. 16-41055

2 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41055 Document: 00513948455 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/11/2017
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.165 What happens when I convert a savings bond that is registered in my name as a single owner, either coowner, an owner with a beneficiary, or an entity?

(a) *Unmatured savings bond.* When the conversion is approved, an unmatured savings bond that is registered in the name of the TreasuryDirect ® account owner as a single owner, either coowner, an owner with beneficiary, or an entity, will be released to the account owner's conversion linked account.

(b) *Matured savings bond.* A savings bond that has reached final maturity and is registered in the name of the TreasuryDirect account owner as a single owner, either coowner, an owner with beneficiary, or an entity, will be converted to a book-entry savings bond and automatically redeemed. The redemption proceeds will be used to purchase a zero-percent certificate of indebtedness in the account owner's name in the primary account.

[74 FR 19420, Apr. 29, 2009]
#### § 566.305 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
EXHIBIT 32.2 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 I, Jon S. Verbeck, Chief Financial Officer,  Acting Principal Accounting Officer, and Treasurer of OP-TECH Environmental Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: June 15, 2010
 /s/ Jon S. Verbeck
 Jon S. Verbeck
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
 Acting Principal Accounting Officer
HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Bureau of Political Military Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Releases

338 items

        -    Media Note  		New U.S.-Poland Foreign Military Financing Direct Loan Agreement Showcases Strong Security Partnership	  September 25, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Call for End of Hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 19, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		House Armed Services Committee Hearing: Defense Cooperation with Taiwan	  Mira K. ResnickSeptember 19, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Imposes Sanctions on a Multinational Network Supporting Iran’s UAV Procurement Activities	  Matthew MillerSeptember 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Seoul, Republic of Korea, Sept 14-15	  September 13, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		 U.S. Security Cooperation With Vietnam	  September 11, 2023 
        -    		Key Topics – Office of Global Programs and Initiatives	   
        -    		About Us – Office of Global Programs and Initiatives	   
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba at a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 6, 2023Kyiv, Ukraine 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Ukraine	  September 6, 2023 

previous page1…56789…34next page

Back to Top
#### Anthony SANTORELLI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James R. COWHEY, Justice of the New York Supreme Court; A. Rocco, Supervising P.O., Commissioner, Department of Corrections, Westchester County, NY; Eliot L. Spitzer, Atty. General, New York, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-2734.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 20, 2001.

Diarmuid White, N.Y., NY, for appellant.

Valerie A. Livingston, Ass’t Dist. Att’y, White Plains, NY, for appellees.

Present Van GRAAFEILAND, KEARSE and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District, of New York, and was argued by counsel.

*79ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it her°by is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Parker’s Memorandum Decision and Order dated December 8, 2000. Although it would have been far preferable for the trial court to give a standard reasonable-doubt instruction, we cannot conclude that the charge given, viewed as a whole, would have misled the jury to return a verdict of guilt on less than the required quantum of proof.

We have considered all of petitioner’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
EX-10.10.7





 Exhibit 10.10.7 

AMENDMENT #1 

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
  

 
 This Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1”)
is issued pursuant to the Collaboration Agreement (“Agreement”), effective November 10, 2017, between Magenta Therapeutics, Inc. (“Magenta”) and National Marrow Donor Program d/b/a Be The Match BioTherapies
(“BTMB”) and incorporates all of the terms and conditions therein. The effective date of this Amendment shall be December 31, 2020. 

The Parties agree to extend the term under the Agreement as follows: 

Replace Section 2. Term in its entirety to read as follows: 

2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date set forth above and continue and remain in effect until
December 31, 2022 or until this Agreement is terminated as provided for in Section 9, “Termination”. 
 Except as provided above, all
other terms and conditions in the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. This Amendment #1 is executed by individuals who are authorized to bind their respective parties. 

 

									
	NATIONAL MARROW DONOR
PROGRAM d/b/a BE THE MATCH
BIOTHERPAIES	 		 	MAGENTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
					
	By:	 	/s/ Mary Frey	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Christina Isacson
		 	Authorized signature	 		 		 	Authorized signature
					
		 	Mary Frey	 		 		 	Christina Isacson
		 	(Typed/Printed Name)	 		 		 	(Typed/Printed Name)
					
	Title:	 	Contracts & Procurement Director	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Business Officer
					
	Date:	 	12/7/2020	 		 	Date:	 	12/14/2020
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeOffice of Foreign Missions...Circular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions

# 						Circular Notes and Notices – Office of Foreign Missions					

17 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202320202019

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeCircular Notes and Notices

Select a Bureau/OfficeOffice of Foreign Missions

          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Accreditation	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Administration	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Banking	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Bonded Warehouse	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Census Bureau	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Customs and Duty Free Entry	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Dependent Work Authorization	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Diplomatic Motor Vehicles	   
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Diplomatic Property Program	  October 1, 2019 
          -    Circular Notes and Notices  		Emergency Management	   

12next page

Back to Top
EX-10.10.4





 Exhibit 10.10.4 

AMENDMENT #2 
 TO

 PROJECT RIDER #1 

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment
#2 to Project Rider #1 (“Amendment #2”) is entered into effective as of the date of the final signature executing this Amendment #2 (“Amendment #2 Effective Date”) by and between Magenta Therapeutics, Inc.
(“Magenta”) and National Marrow Donor Program d/b/a Be The Match Biotherapies (“BTMB”) (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Parties executed a Collaboration Agreement, effective November 10, 2017 and a Project Rider, effective December 6, 2017 (as amended by
that certain Amendment #1, effective December 6, 2018, “Project Rider #1”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to revise the Payment
Schedule of the Project Rider #1. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for the valuable consideration contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, Magenta and BTMB
agree to the following amendment to be effective as of the Amendment #2 Effective Date as follows: 
 Amendment to Project Rider #1 

 

	 	1.	 Delete the Payment Schedule in Section D. Compensation of BTMB of Project Rider #1 in its
entirety and replace it with the following to read as follows: 


 PAYMENT SCHEDULE 

 

			
	For Services provided by BTMB during Calendar Year 2020 (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020), Magenta will pay BTMB a fixed price quarterly payment of $25,000.	  	 BTMB will invoice
$25,000 every January 15th for consulting services occurring during the period commencing January 1st and ending March 31st.
  
 BTMB will invoice $25,000 every
April 15th for consulting services commencing April 1st and ending June 30th.

 
 BTMB will invoice $25,000 every July 15th for consulting services commencing July 1st and ending September 30th.

 
 BTMB will invoice $25,000 every October 15th for consulting services commencing October 1st and ending
December 31st.


 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 












 This Amendment #2 is executed by individuals who are duly authorized to legally bind their respective
parties as of the Amendment #2 Effective Date: 
  

									
	MAGENTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 		 	NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM d/b/a BE THE MATCH BIOTHERAPIES
					
	By:	 	/s/ Christina Isacson	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Mary Frey
		 	Authorized signature	 		 		 	Authorized signature
					
		 	Christina Isacson	 		 		 	Mary Frey
		 	(Typed/Printed Name)	 		 		 	(Typed/Printed Name)
					
	Title:	 	Chief Business Officer	 		 	Title:	 	Contracts & Procurement Department
	Date:	 	November 13, 2019	 		 	Date:	 	11/12/19


  
 2
§ 553.303 Effective date. ( a ) The term *effective date* refers to the effective date of the applicable prohibitions and directives contained in this part as follows: ( 1 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 533.201(a)(1), 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 13, 2014; and
( 2 ) With respect to a person whose property and interests in property are otherwise blocked pursuant to § 553.201, the earlier of the date of actual or constructive notice that such person's property and interests in property are blocked.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, *constructive notice* is the date that a notice of the blocking of the relevant person's property and interests in property is published in the Federal Register.
§ 579.507 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 579.506(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 579.201 or any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13848 of September 12, 2018, is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 579.506(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (a) authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 579.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) Email (preferred method): *OFAC.Regulations.Reports@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) U.S. mail: OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
# Argentina

137 items

        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Argentina	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Other Release  		17th Meeting of the U.S.–Argentina Joint Standing Committee on Nuclear Energy Cooperation	  April 8, 2022Buenos Aires, Argentina 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Katie Tobin, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Transborder at the National Security Council	  March 11, 2022 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (22-308) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation in Space Geodetic Research	  March 8, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Brian A. Nichols, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, on the IX Summit of the Americas	  Brian A. NicholsJanuary 20, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Argentine Foreign Minister Cafiero	  January 18, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Argentine Foreign Minister Santiago Cafiero Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 18, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Argentina	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s meeting with Argentine Secretary for Strategic Affairs Béliz 	  October 22, 2021 
        -    DipNote  		Diversity and Diplomacy: Celebrating Our Hispanic Heritage	  October 14, 2021 

previous page1…56789…14next page

Back to Top
40332.

#### HARRELL v. THE STATE.

Jordan, Judge.

Abner Harrell and his son, Walter Franklin Harrell, were jointly indicted for the offense of murder. The defendant Abner Harrell was tried separately and was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and the exception is to that judgment.

*Held:*

This is a companion case to that of *Harrell v. State,*ante, in which this court held that the conviction of the defendant’s son, Walter Franklin Harrell, of the offense of voluntary manslaughter, was unauthorized by the evidence and reversed the denial of his motion for new trial on the general grounds. In so ruling the court stated as follows in the opinion in Division 3: “The uncontradicted evidence shows that the defendant [Walter Franklin Harrell] shot the deceased when the deceased grabbed a riñe and was in the process of attempting to cock it and shoot the defendant. The deceased had already made an unprovoked attack on the defendant’s father, and the defendant, in his extra-judicial statements and in his sworn testimony on the trial, stated facts in support of his conclusion that he feared for his life and that of his father.”

The evidence in this case, including the sworn testimony of the defendant’s son that he shot the deceased in self-defense, is substantially the same as in that case; and is insufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction of the offense of voluntary manslaughter. Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial on the general grounds, and the special grounds need not be considered.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*

*311Decided September 12, 1963.

*Kopp & Peavy, J. Edwin Peavy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Dewey Hayes, Solicitor General, M. C. Pritchard,*contra.
§ 560.516 Transfers of funds involving Iran. ( a ) United States depository institutions are authorized to process transfers of funds to or from Iran, or for the direct or indirect benefit of persons in Iran or the Government of Iran, if the transfer arises from, and is ordinarily incident and necessary to give effect to, an underlying transaction that has been authorized by a specific or general license issued pursuant to, or set forth in, this part and does not involve debiting or crediting an Iranian account.
( b ) United States registered brokers or dealers in securities are authorized to process transfers of funds to or from Iran, or for the direct or indirect benefit of persons in Iran or the Government of Iran, if the transfer arises from, and is ordinarily incident and necessary to give effect to, an underlying transaction that has been authorized by a specific or general license issued pursuant to, or set forth in, this part and does not involve debiting or crediting an Iranian account.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41442

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-AVILA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1290-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio 

Rodriguez-Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Avila has filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez-Avila’s response. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41442 Document: 00513159021 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41442

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41442 Document: 00513159021 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
#### § 547.509 Emergency medical services.

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are otherwise prohibited by this part or any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13413 of October 27, 2006 are authorized.

[83 FR 57316, Nov. 15, 2018]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 12, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00036

- CV

Cirrus Exploration Company, Appellant

v.

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND ROSE

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on December 19, 2012. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the district court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment and

renders judgment in favor of Cirrus in the amount of $70,598.19, plus interest as allowed under

the Tax Code

. The appellee s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the

court below.
# Antigua and Barbuda

61 items

        -    		Caribbean Basin Security Initiative	   
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  June 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Antigua and Barbuda (17-607) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  June 7, 2017 
        -    Report  		Antigua and Barbuda	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…34567next page

Back to Top
#### Henry Lloyd GASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. U-103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 1974.

• Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Kirby v. State, 217 So.2d 619 (Fla.App.1969).

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.