alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2711

To provide for the substitution of timber for the canceled Elkhorn Ridge

Timber Sale.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 5, 1995

Mr. RIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for the substitution of timber for the canceled

Elkhorn Ridge Timber Sale.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBSTITUTION OF TIMBER FOR CANCELED

4 TIMBER SALE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions of

6 the Act of July 31, 1947 (30 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and

7 the requirements of section 5402.0–6 of title 43, Code of

8 Federal Regulations, the Secretary of the Interior, acting

9 through the Bureau of Land Management, is authorized
2

•HR 2711 IH

1 to substitute, without competition, a contract for timber

2 identified for harvest located on public lands administered

3 by the Bureau of Land Management in the State of Cali4 fornia of comparable value for the following terminated

5 timber contract: Elkhorn Ridge Timber Sale, Contract No.

6 CA–050–TS–88–01.

7 (b) DISCLAIMER.—Nothing in this section shall be

8 construed as changing any law or policy of the Federal

9 Government beyond the timber sale substitution specified

10 in this section.

Æ
#### COCA-COLA COMPANY-FOODS DIVISION, (Self-Insured), Appellant, v. Leslie OSTERHOUT, Appellee.

No. XX-133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1981.

Jesse F. Sparks, P. A., Orlando, for appellant.

Richard W. Lobb of Maher, Overchuck, Langa & Cate, P. A., Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant injured his back in 1977 while employed as a grove caretaker and equipment operator with Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division. An anatomical disability was timely accepted and the sole issue before the Deputy Commissioner was the claimant’s entitlement to additional benefits based upon wage earning capacity loss. The issue presented for our consideration is whether the record supports a 15% wage earning capacity loss.

The order itself gives little insight into the basis for the award. The claimant is a 30-year-old male with a GED and a work history of industrial labor, grove work, truck and heavy equipment driving. After surgery, occasioned by his injury, he returned to his job with Coca-Cola and continued his employment until he was discharged for reasons unrelated to his injury. When discharged he was earning twenty-five cents per hour more than he was receiving at the time of his injury. After a brief job search he found similar employment with ABC Fruit Company, and within a few months he was earning $3.70 per hour as opposed to the $3.15 per hour he was making at the time of his injury. In addition to wages, ABC furnishes him with a house for the nominal sum of $5.00 per week. The appellee argues that his increased earnings are not necessarily reflective of whether he has suffered a wage earning capacity loss. We agree that in measuring such loss no single factor is conclusive. *Walker v. Electronic Products & Engineering Co.,*248 So.2d 161 (Fla.1971). The claim must be evaluated in light of the total evidence bearing upon wage earning capacity diminution. *Walker, supra,*sets *1295forth the more germane factors to be considered. When the claimant’s proof is measured in light of *Walker*we find that a loss of wage earning capacity is not supported by competent substantial evidence.

The order is therefore reversed, and the claim is dismissed.

MILLS, C. J., and SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
#### § 560.314 United States person; U.S. person.

The term *United States* *person* or *U.S. person* means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Chile (23-926) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Chile (23-926) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 26, 2023

Nuclear Energy

Signed at Vienna September 26, 2023; entered into force September 26, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [16 MB]

Tags

ChileNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
#### Meadow Ridge, Inc. *v.*Jones, etc. et al.

[No. 20,377.

Filed March 9, 1966.]

*453
      *Johnson and Carroll,*of Evansville, for appellant.

*Jerome L. Salm, Robert S. Matthews & Ralph E. Moore,*of Evansville, for appellees.

On Motion to Dismiss

Mote, J.

This is an appeal from the Vanderburgh Circuit Court from a judgment therein rendered against appellant and in favor of appellees.

In effect, the judgment upheld the decision of the Evansville-Vanderburgh Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals denying to appellant a variation in a certain zoning ordinance of said City of Evansville.

The case is fully briefed and, indeed, has been assigned for oral argument. However, on February 16, 1966, appellees filed herein a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the question raised by the appeal is now moot, it appearing from said motion, with supporting data, that said Board of Zoning Appeals has now granted the variance originally sought.

By direct inquiry of this Court of counsel for appellant, on March 1, 1966, said counsel by letter has stated that they “have no objections to the dismissal and join in the petition seeking the dismissal of the within cause.”

In this situation it is now made to appear that the question presented by the appeal is either moot or that counsel for both parties desire dismissal.

The oral argument is now cancelled and in pursuance of appellees’ motion and the concurrence by appellant’s counsel joining in the petition for dismissal, this cause is now dismissed, costs taxed against appellant.

*454Bierly, J., Carson, J., Faulconer, J., Hunter, J., Prime, C. J., Smith, P. J., and Wickens, J., concur.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 6'58.
**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
Viewers
http://www.adobe.com.

----

Transmittal Letter
Table of ContentsChapter 1  - IntroductionChapter 2  - EMP Environment (File size - 2.7 MB.)- Chapter 2   - Text only (file size - 1.8 MB.) 
- Chapter 2  -  Tables and Figures only 
Chapter 3  - EMP Hardening Concepts for Facilities (File size - 1MB.)- Chapter 3   - Text only 
- Chapter 3   - Tables and Figures only 
Chapter 4  - System Engineering Requirements- Chapter 4   - Text only 
- Chapter 4   - Tables and Figures only 
Chapter 5  - Facility Design (File size - 10 MB.) - Chapter 5   - Text only - pages 1- 32 (File size - 2.3MB.) 
- Chapter 5   - Text only - pages 33 - 68 (File size - 3MB.) 
- Chapter 5   - Tables and Figures only - pages 69 - 100 (File size -1.1 MB.) 
- Chapter 5   - Tables and Figures only - pages 101 - 152 (File size -2 MB.)  
- Chapter 5   - Tables and Figures only - page 153 - 200 (File size -1.3 MB.) 
Chapter 6  - EMP and Tempest Testing Requirements (File size - 4.1MB.)- Chapter 6   - Text only  (File size - 3.1 MB.) 
- Chapter 6   - Tables and Figures only (File size - 1 MB.) 
Chapter 7  - Protection Maitenance and Surveillance- Chapter 7   - Text only 
- Chapter 7   - Tables and Figures only 
Chapter 8  - EMP and Temest Risks (File size 1 MB.)Chapter 9  - EMP and Tempest Protection ConceptsChapter 10  - Systems IntegrationChapter 11  - Design and Specification Process (File size 2.6 MB.)- Chapter 11   - Text only (File size - 2.1 MB.) 
- Chapter 11   - Tables and Figures only 
Chapter 12  - Tempest-Shielded Facilities (File size 1.1 MB.)- Chapter 12   - Text only 
- Chapter 12   - Tables and Figures only 
Entire - Because of its size (26 MB), the "Entire" file has not been posted here.  Printed documentis 467 pages.
- FPC Home
- About Us
- Thematic Programming
- Co-Ops
- Briefings
- Reporting Tours
- Credentials & Visas
- Contact Us
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeForeign Press Centers...Contact Us – Foreign Press Centers

# 									Contact Us							

Foreign Press Centers

**Washington Foreign Press Center**U.S. Department of State****Bureau of Global Public Affairs****National Press Building529 14th Street NW, Suite 800Washington, DC 20045Phone: (202) 504-6301 | Fax: (202) 504-6334dcfpc@state.gov

 

**New York Foreign Press Center****U.S. Department of State****Bureau of Global Public Affairs**799 U.N. Plaza, 10th FloorNew York, New York 10017Phone: (646) 282-2830 | Fax: (646) 282-2847nyfpc@state.gov

 

## Related Articles

-  											 													Contact Us			
Read more
 

Back to Top
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-0997
<PERIOD-END>                                Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                           12,044
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 74,148
<PP&E>                                          204,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  179,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   99,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            95,926
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     99,648
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23,814
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-ESPENSE>                                2,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     283
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 283
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2607

To prohibit desecration of Veterans’ memorials.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit desecration of Veterans’ memorials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Memorials

5 Protection Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESECRATION OF VETERANS’ MEMORIALS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:

10 ‘‘§ 1368. Desecration of veterans’ memorials

11 ‘‘Whoever willfully injures or commits any depreda12 tion against any structure, plaque, statue, or other monu-
2

•HR 2607 IH

1 ment on public property commemorating the service of any

2 person or persons in the armed forces of the United

3 States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not

4 more than 10 years, or both, but if the damage or at5 tempted damage does not exceed the sum of $100, the

6 defendant shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not

7 more than one year, or both.’’.

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

9 at the beginning of chapter 65 of title 18, United States

10 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1368. Desecration of veterans’ memorials.’’.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 30, 2017, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors,LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trusteeand Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Operating Advisor , with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-245P (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section13.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from May 30, 2017 throughDecember 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo  Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00286-CV

In re Lauren Jane Andersen

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Lauren Jane Andersen has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

complaining that the trial court granted the real party in interest’s motion for new trial and related 

orders after the court had lost plenary power. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. Because Andersen’s suit is a SAPCR governed by the Texas Family Code, we 

conclude that the trial court rendered judgment within the meaning of Section 101.026 when it 

issued its letter ruling declaring that “the Motion for a New Trial is GRANTED” before it lost 

plenary power. See Tex. Fam. Code § 101.026 (“‘Render’ means the pronouncement by a judge 

of the court’s ruling on a matter. The pronouncement may be made orally in the presence of the 

court reporter or in writing, including on the court’s docket sheet or by a separate written 

instrument.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and lift our May 17, 2023 

stay order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Filed: August 25, 2023
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to provide for the restriction

on assistance to the Government of Indonesia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 1995

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to provide

for the restriction on assistance to the Government of

Indonesia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘East Timor Human

5 Rights Accountability Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON ASSISTANCE TO THE GOVERN7 MENT OF INDONESIA.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 620 of the Foreign Assist9 ance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2370) is amended by adding

10 at the end the following new subsection:
2

•HR 2746 IH

1 ‘‘(y) Assistance may not be provided under this or

2 any other Act for a fiscal year to the Government of Indo3 nesia unless the President determines and certifies to the

4 Congress that—

5 ‘‘(1) assistance provided under this or any other

6 Act for the preceding fiscal year to such Government

7 has not been used to violate human rights in East

8 Timor or to support the occupation of East Timor

9 by Indonesia; and

10 ‘‘(2) such Government has provided assurances

11 to the President that assistance to be provided for

12 the current fiscal year will not be used to violate

13 human rights in East Timor or to support the occu14 pation of East Timor by Indonesia.’’.

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The restriction on assistance

16 contained in section 620(y) of the Foreign Assistance Act

17 of 1961, as added by subsection (a), shall apply only with

18 respect to assistance provided in fiscal years beginning on

19 or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00322-CR

EX PARTE JASON NEAL DELONG §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 462nd District Court

of Denton County (F21-1211-462)

February 22, 2024

Opinion by Justice Wallach

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
HomeDigest of United States Practice in International Law 2020...Chapter 14: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020

# 									Chapter 14: Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2020							

 

2020 Digest: Chapter 14 [315 KB]

Tags

International LawOffice of the Legal Adviser

Back to Top
#### § 536.512 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78471, Dec. 21, 2022]
#### § 579.509 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78479, Dec. 21, 2022]
CHEMFAB CORPORATION

          FIRST AMENDMENT 
          TO
          AMENDED AND RESTATED 1991 STOCK OPTION PLAN


          This FIRST AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") to the Amended and
          Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") of Chemfab
          Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is being
          adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting
          held on August 3, 1995, subject to ratification and approval by
          the stockholders of the Company as set forth in Section 3 below.

          1.Amendment of Section 5 of the Plan.  Section 5 of the Plan is
          hereby amended by replacing the number "700,000" in the first
          line thereof with the number "1,000,000".

          2.Ratification, etc.  Except to the extent amended by this
          Amendment, all of the terms, provisions and conditions set forth
          in the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and remain in full
          force and effect.  The Plan and this Amendment shall be read and
          construed together as a single instrument.  

          3.Effective Date.  This Amendment shall not become effective
          until and unless ratified and approved by the stockholders of the
          Company on or before August 3, 1996.  In the event that the
          stockholders of the Company shall not ratify and approve this
          Amendment, the Plan, as previously adopted and approved, shall
          remain in full force and effect.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****DOE Solar Energy TechnologiesProgram FY ... annual report [electronic resource].**
 
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007| 2008 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.167: | E 10.35:
Item Number:0429-A-79 (online) | 0430-Q-25(online)
CGP systemNumber:000628240
 
September 9, 2019
§ 550.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 550.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 550.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
#### § 569.401 [Reserved]
www.gpo.gov

### §4d. Plants, machinery, and equipment

The United States Bureau of Mines is further authorized, under the general direction of the Secretary of the Interior, to erect such plants, construct and purchase such machinery and equipment, and to take such other steps as it may deem necessary and proper to effectuate the purposes of section 4c of this title.

(May 15, 1936, ch. 397, §2, 49 Stat. 1275; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.