alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 552.508 Payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States. ( a ) *Professional fees and incurred expenses.* ( 1 ) Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to § 552.507(a) to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from: ( i ) A source within the United States;
( ii ) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or
( iii ) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to § 552.507(a) are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to any part of this chapter or any Executive order or statute.
( 2 ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, any other part of this chapter, or any Executive order or statute has an interest.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must submit annual reports no later than 30 days following the end of the calendar year during which the payments were received providing information on the funds received. Such reports shall specify: ( i ) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and
( ii ) If applicable: ( A ) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;
( B ) A general description of the services provided; and
( C ) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services.
( 2 ) The reports, which must reference this section, are to be submitted to OFAC using one of the following methods: ( i ) Email (preferred method): *OFAC.Regulations.Reports@treasury.gov ;* or
( ii ) U.S. mail: OFAC Regulations Reports, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Freedman's Bank Building, Washington, DC 20220.
HomeBiographies...Julie Stufft

# 				Julie Stufft			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa Services						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				August 17, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 8, 2009

d0505 

# Order

May 8, 2009

137664-5 & (47)

GHASSAN M. SAAB,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee/Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 137664-5 COA: 278384; 278772 Genesee CC: 04-079096-CK ALICE FARAH,Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellant/Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J. ( dissenting ).

Because I believe the lower courts erred in their interpretatio n of the parties’ property settlement agreement (PSA), I dissent. In particul ar, I believe the trial court erred in determining that the PSA only allo wed for the division of “marital assets.” Instead, the parties stat ed that any non-disclosed “real or personal assets,” without further limitation, were subject to judicial division. By contrast, when th e parties intended to refer to “marital assets,” they clearly knew how to communicate this, because they used this specific phrase in other provisions of the PSA.

C ORRIGAN , J., joins the statement of M ARKMAN , J.
#### § 552.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Timothy N. Jenson, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Merisel, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13A-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;; and

                  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date:    May 14, 2004
                                /s/Timothy N. Jenson
                               _____________________________________
                               Timothy N. Jenson
                               Chief  Executive   Officer,   President  and
                                     Chief  Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0433]


Certificate of Alternative Compliance for the Tug Boat LA FORCE

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that a Certificate of Alternative 
Compliance was issued for the tug boat LA FORCE as required by 33 
U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 CFR 81.18.

DATES: The Certificate of Alternative Compliance was issued on May 15, 
2009.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is available for inspection or 
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this 
docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov, 
inserting USCG-2009-0433 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking 
``Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice, 
call CWO2 David Mauldin, District Eight, Prevention Division, U.S. 
Coast Guard, telephone 504-671-2153. If you have questions on viewing 
or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background And Purpose

    The tug boat LA FORCE will operate as part of an articulated tug 
and barge (ATB). Due to the design of the vessel, it would be difficult 
and impractical to build a supporting structure that would put the side 
lights within 3.5' from the greatest breadth of the Vessel, as required 
by Annex I, paragraph 3(b) of the 72 COLREGS and Annex I, Section 
84.05(b), of the Inland Rules Act.
    The Certificate of Alternative Compliance allows for the placement 
of the side lights to deviate from requirements set forth in Annex I, 
paragraph 3(b) of 72 COLREGS, and Annex I, paragraph 84.05(b) of the 
Inland Rules Act.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 U.S.C. 1605(c), and 33 
CFR 81.18.

    Dated: June 11, 2009.
J.W. Johnson,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Inspections and Investigations 
Branch, By Direction of the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
 [FR Doc. E9-20243 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### Wallace Edward HOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-804.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 10, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Ellen Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The minutes of judgment and sentencing erroneously reflect a conviction of aggravated assault as charged in the information rather than appellant’s actual conviction of assault and battery. Accordingly we direct that the minutes of judgment and sentencing be amended to conform with the verdict and adjudication on assault and battery. In all other respects the judgment and sentence are

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
HomeThe Secretary of State...Secretary of State  Releases

# The Secretary of State Releases

6072 items

        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  With Mika Brzezinski, Jonathan Lemire, and Michael Barnicle of MSNBC’s Morning Joe	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 6, 2024Normandy American CemeteryColleville-sur-Mer, France 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  With Tony Dokoupil of CBS Mornings	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 6, 2024Normandy American CemeteryColleville-sur-Mer, France 
        -    Press Statement  		Commemorating the 80th Anniversary of D-Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 6, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Sweden National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 6, 2024 
        -    		Today’s Briefing Schedule	  June 6, 2024 
        -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – June 6, 2024	  June 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Denmark’s Constitution Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 5, 2024 
        -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – June 5, 2024	  June 4, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with UN Secretary-General Guterres	  June 4, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Algerian Foreign Minister Attaf	  June 4, 2024 

123…608next page

Back to Top
#### GENERAL TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONOCO, INC. and Conoco Specialty Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. General Technology Applications, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Conoco, Inc. and Conoco Specialty Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-1397, 00-1541.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2001.

ORDER

DYK, Circuit Judge.

General Technology Applications, Inc. (GTA) moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal 00-1541. Conoco, Inc. and Conoco Specialty Products do not oppose on the condition that Conoco’s reply brief in 00-1397 is due January 8, 2001.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) GTA’s motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal 00-1541 is granted. Conoco’s reply brief in 00-1397 is due January 8, 2001.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) The revised official caption for 00-1397 is reflected above.
40735.

#### JOHNSON v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY et al.

Jordan, Judge.

Ophelia Turner Johnson filed claim for workmen’s compensation as the widow of the deceased employee. The hearing director found that the plaintiff and the deceased had been legally divorced in 1942, and that they had not thereafter entered into a valid common law marriage as contended by the plaintiff. Her claim was denied by the hearing director, and the award was affirmed by the Superior Court of Chatham County. The exception, based on the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact, is to that judgment. *Held:*

While the evidence in this case disclosed that the plaintiff and the decedent had lived together during intervals after their divorce in 1942, until December, 1961, a finding was authorized by the evidence, including the testimony of the plaintiff, that they did not at any time after the divorce enter into an express agreement to be husband and wife; and that they were engaged only in a meretricious cohabitation. *Wolverine Ins. Co. v. Leach,*100 Ga. App. 570 (112 SE2d 10); *Peacock v. Peacock,*196 Ga. 441 (26 SE2d 608).

The evidence and record in this case is quite voluminous and would require many pages to set forth the complicated marital and extra-marital situations in which the claimant and the *801deceased were involved. This court has given full consideration to all facets of the record and the evidence and concludes that the hearing director was authorized to find that the plaintiff was not the legal widow of the deceased employee by virtue of a common law marriage; and that the superior court did not err in affirming the award denying compensation.

Decided June 2, 1964.

*Joseph B. Bergen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Pierce, Ranitz & Lee, Dennis Pierce, James 0. Creech,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.16 How do I access my account?

You may access your account online using your account number, password, and any other form(s) of authentication that we may require.

[72 FR 30978, June 5, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 26, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862612
<NAME> UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                           2,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,495
<INVENTORY>                                    232,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,369
<PP&E>                                         372,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                 348,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,186,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,381
<BONDS>                                        474,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (178,033)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,186,496
<SALES>                                        949,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               949,777
<CGS>                                          563,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  781,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,106)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,864
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (21,651)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lance Cornell      
|Lance Cornell          
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 9, 2010
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Foreign Affairs Policy Board
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureaus & Offices > The Secretary of State...Policy Planning Staff

# Policy Planning Staff

## 				Our Mission			

					Created in 1947 by George Kennan at the request of Secretary of State George C. Marshall, the Policy Planning Staff (S/P) serves as a source of independent policy analysis and advice for the Secretary of State. The Policy Planning Staff''s mission is to take a longer term, strategic view of global trends and frame recommendations for the Secretary of State to advance U.S. interests and American values.				

Director

Salman Ahmed

Back to Top
§ 560.547 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges authorized. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, Internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
Note to § 560.547 :
*See* § 560.517, which authorizes U.S. depository institutions and U.S. registered brokers or dealers in securities to provide and be compensated for services with respect to the limited maintenance of Iranian accounts other than blocked accounts, including the payment of interest and dividends and the debiting of service charges.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2791

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

limit funds to States that do not enact laws that require a test to

detect the presence of the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency

syndrome in certain cases of assault.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 1995

Mr. MANTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to limit funds to States that do not enact

laws that require a test to detect the presence of the

etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome

in certain cases of assault.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TESTING REQUIREMENT.

4 Section 506(f) of the Omnibus Crime Control and

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para7 graph (4);
2

•HR 2791 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘paragraph

2 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end of paragraph (2) the

4 following:

5 ‘‘(3) Paragraph (1)(A) refers to a State that does not

6 have in effect, and does not enforce, in such fiscal year,

7 a law that requires the State at the request of the victim

8 of an assault that may have exposed, by a means recog9 nized by the Center for Disease Control, such victim to

10 the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syn11 drome—

12 ‘‘(A) to administer, to the defendant convicted

13 under State law of such assault, a test to detect in

14 such defendant the presence of the etiologic agent

15 for acquired immune deficiency syndrome;

16 ‘‘(B) to disclose the results of such test to such

17 defendant and to the victim of such assault; and

18 ‘‘(C) to provide to the victim of such assault

19 counseling regarding HIV disease, HIV testing, in

20 accordance with applicable law, and referral for ap21 propriate health care and support services.’’.

Æ
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation

# Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Missile, Biological, and Chemical Nonproliferation leads working-level U.S. government efforts to impede, roll back, and eliminate the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons, missile delivery systems for weapons of mass destruction, and related equipment, materials, and technology. 				

Back to Top