alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

43617 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 164 

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of August 21, 2009 

Provision of Aviation Insurance Coverage for Commercial Air 

Carrier Service in Domestic and International Operations 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Transportation 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States including 49 U.S.C. 44302, et seq., I hereby: 

1. Determine that continuation of U.S. flag commercial air service is necessary 

in the interest of air commerce, national security, and the foreign policy 

of the United States. 

2. Approve provision by the Secretary of Transportation of insurance or 

reinsurance to U.S. flag air carriers against loss or damage arising out of 

any risk from the operation of an aircraft in the manner and to the extent 

provided in Chapter 443 of 49 U.S.C., until August 31, 2010, when he 

determine that such insurance or reinsurance cannot be obtained on reasonable terms and conditions from any company authorized to conduct an 

insurance business in a State of the United States. 

You are directed to bring this determination immediately to the attention 

of all air carriers within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 40102 (a) (2), and to 

arrange for its publication in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 21, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–20749 

Filed 8–25–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4910–62–M 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
WWW.GEN-4.ORG

Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor (LFR)

The Lead-Cooled Fast 

Reactor (LFR) system 

features a fast-spectrum 

lead or lead/bismuth eutectic 

liquid metal-cooled reactor and 

a closed fuel cycle for efficient 

conversion of fertile uranium 

and management of actinides. 

The LFR is a small factorybuilt turnkey plant operating 

on a closed fuel cycle with a 

very long refueling interval (15 

to 20 years) cassette core or 

replaceable reactor module. 

The LFR is a small factorybuilt turnkey plant operating 

on a closed fuel cycle with a 

very long refueling interval 

(15 to 20 years) cassette core 

or replaceable reactor module. Its features are designed 

to meet market opportunities 

07-GA50277-06

for electricity production on 

small grids, and for developing countries that may not 

wish to deploy indigenous 

fuel cycle infrastructure to 

support their nuclear energy 

systems. The LFR system 

is designed for distributed 

generation of electricity and 

other energy products, including hydrogen and potable 

water. The fuel is metal or nitride-based, containing fertile 

uranium and transuranics.

For more information: Ralph Bennett • 208-526-7708 • Ralph.Bennett@inl.gov

Reactor

Core

Heat Sink Heat Sink

Reactor

Coolant

Header

Coolant

Module

Reactor Module/

Fuel Cartridge

(Removable)

U-Tube Heat

Exchanger

Modules (4)

Control

Rods

Electrical

Power

Compressor

Compressor

Intercooler

Pre

Cooler

Recuperator

Generator

Turbine

Inlet

Distributor
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to
the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Joseph G. Bleser   
|Joseph G. Bleser       
|Chief Financial Officer



Date: July 29, 2004
§ 583.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 583.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 583.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 583.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds blocked pursuant to § 583.201 may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 583.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
#### Deborah CROCKER et al. v. Ray SHARPE et al. William Scott FARMER v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. et al. Tom HILL and Jenny R. Hill v. Kenneth R. SHARPE et al.

No. 64540.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

In re Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Tom Hill and Jenny R. Hill applying for writ of certiorari, Third Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of Rapides. 368 So.2d 500, 368 So.2d 487, 368 So.2d 499.

Writ denied.
#### § 579.406 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked.

Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 579.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 579.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,355
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              32
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,031
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,785
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,728
<LOANS>                                         80,313
<ALLOWANCE>                                        804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,113
<DEPOSITS>                                     114,691
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,075
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                435
<LONG-TERM>                                         84
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,288
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 130,113
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,245
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,301
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    33
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,579
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,788
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,801
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,778
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    757
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         529
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                        967
<LOANS-PAST>                                        61
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   733
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       51
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  804
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               391
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            413
        

</TABLE>
#### § 584.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise specified, reference to any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, directive, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20276 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS AGUIRRE, also known as Jorge Gonzalez Patino,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-405-3

--------------------

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Aguirre appeals his sentence for his convictions

for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and

aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine. 

Aguirre argues that the district court improperly enhanced his

offense level for possessing a dangerous weapon in connection

with the drug trafficking offense. The sentencing guidelines

provide that a defendant's offense level should be increased in

relation to a drug crime if the defendant possessed a dangerous

weapon. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1); United States v. Gaytan, 74
No. 01-20276

-2-

F.3d 545, 559 (5th Cir. 1996). “The adjustment should be applied

if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that

the weapon was connected with the offense.” § 2D1.1, comment.

(n.3); see United States v. Vasquez, 161 F.3d 909, 912 (5th Cir.

1998). 

The weapons were found in Aguirre’s residence, which was

used to store large quantities of drugs to be distributed in

smaller amounts. See United States v. McKeever, 906 F.2d 129,

134 (5th Cir. 1990). As it is not “clearly improbable” that the

firearms were connected to the offense, the district court did

not clearly err in applying the enhancement under § 2D1.1(b). 

United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1041 (5th Cir. 1996). 

AFFIRMED.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Bahrain National Day

# 									Bahrain National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 16, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our best wishes to His Majesty King Hamad and the people of the Kingdom of Bahrain on their National Day.

This year the United States and Bahrain further strengthened our historic partnership and friendship through our third Strategic Dialogue and the signing of the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement. I look forward to deepening our security and economic ties as we work together to create a more peaceful, prosperous, and interconnected Middle East through security cooperation, trade, investment, transportation ties, and joint technological advancements.

Please accept my warmest congratulations on your special occasion.

Tags

BahrainBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsThe Secretary of StateStrategic Dialogue

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
122 STAT. 3006 PUBLIC LAW 110–305—AUG. 12, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5477: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

June 3, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–305 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 South 

Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, as the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CHI MUI POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, 

California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Chi Mui Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 12, 2008. 

Aug. 12, 2008 

[H.R. 5477] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 548.405 Provision and receipt of services. ( a ) The prohibitions contained in § 548.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
( b ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 548.201 apply to services received in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, where the service is performed by, or at the direction of, a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
( c ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201, or negotiate with or enter into contracts signed by a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
Note 1 to § 548.405 .
*See* §§ 548.507 and 548.509 for general licenses authorizing the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.
#### Mae Louise VERHUNCE and Alfred Verhunce, her husband, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 79-643.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 21, 1979.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Redlus, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., and Mark A. Dresnick, Asst. County Atty., for appel-lees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

*641PER CURIAM.

A summary final judgment was entered in favor of Metropolitan Dade County because the appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, had not given the notice required by Section 2-2 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida (under the Code, this is a condition prerequisite to a tort claim).

The summary final judgment is reversed upon the authority of *Scavella v. Fernandez,*371 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979),1 with directions to the trial court to proceed with the cause.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

1

. The order under review in the instant case was entered prior to the *Scavella*opinion.
#### § 526.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license issued by OFAC does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such regulation, ruling, instruction, order, directive, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
§ 562.505 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges authorized. ( a ) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any blocked account held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charges* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, Internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.
HomeBureaus & Offices > Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Office of Strategic Stability and Deterrence Affairs

# Office of Strategic Stability and Deterrence Affairs

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of Strategic Stability and Deterrence Affairs (SSD) leads in the development, diplomatic negotiation, Congressional coordination, implementation, verification, and compliance analysis of both current and prospective nuclear arms control measures and agreements. SSD also engages with allies and partners to provide them with confidence and reassurance in U.S. deterrence commitments, while seeking to reduce risk and improve stability with Russia and the People’s Republic of China.				

Back to Top
§ 548.301 Blocked account; blocked property. The terms *blocked account* and *blocked property* mean any account or property subject to the prohibitions in § 548.201 held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201, or in which such person has an interest, and with respect to which payments, transfers, exportations, withdrawals, or other dealings may not be made or effected except pursuant to a license or other authorization from OFAC expressly authorizing such action. Note 1 to § 548.301 .
*See* § 548.411 concerning the blocked status of property and interests in property of an entity that is directly or indirectly owned, whether individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Irving ZISOOK and Jean Zisook, Appellees.

No. 80-306.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1981.

Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Murray P. Yanks, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Irving and Jean Zisook. Because the affidavits and depositions presented by State Farm in opposition to the motion raise questions as to whether Zisook effectively rejected higher levels of uninsured motorist coverage, we find that there is not an absence of a genuine issue of material fact. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); *Perez, II v. City of Miami,*358 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); *Villa v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.,*354 So.2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); *Reflex, N.*V. v. *UMET Trust,*336 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Reversed and the cause remanded for trial.
#### Andrew BROUSSARD, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George J. CHAMPAGNE, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 8311.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 30, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 1981.

Jo Ann Nixon, Lafayette, for Andrew Broussard.

Champagne, Colomb and Brumbaugh, George J. Champagne, Jr., Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.

Before CULPEPPER, FORET and LA-BORDE, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned this date in *George Champagne, Jr., et al. v. Andrew Broussard, et ux.,*401 So.2d 1060, with which this case was consolidated in the trial court and on appeal, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court.

Costs of appeal are assessed against defendants-appellees; costs of the trial court previously incurred and any other costs shall be assessed upon final determination of this case.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 99.12



CONSENT



The undersigned hereby consents to the use of my name and the scientific
and technical information with respect to the The Tonopah Lithium Claims Project derived from Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections
1 through 12 and Portions of Sections 15 through 27 of the technical report titled “Tonopah Lithium Claims Project NI 43-101 Technical
Report – Preliminary Economic Assessment” with an effective date of January 31, 2023, which is included in this annual report
on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2023 (the “Form 40-F”) and the exhibits filed with the Form 40-F being filed
by American Lithium Corp. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.





|                   | 
|------------------ | 
|                   | 
|                   | 
|                   | 
|Date: May 30, 2023 |
#### § 542.102 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.

[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014. Redesignated from § 542.601 at 89 FR 48313, June 6, 2024]