alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 1 

## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2 - 0 8 - 0 4 8 - CV
S HE R I L YN M AGE E
- F L I CK , AP P E L L ANT I ND I VI DU ALL Y, AS PERSO N A L REPRESEN TA TI V E, A S H EI R TO A N D O N BE H A LF OF AL L B E NE F I CI AR I E S T O THE E STATE OF M ABELPHI L L I PS V . TH I O F TEXA S A T LO N G M EA D O W , APPELLEE L L C D / B / A L O N G ME A D O W H EA LTH C A RE C EN TER

----- ----- --

FR O M THE 16TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- A ppel l ant Sh er i l yn M agee- Fl i ck, I ndi vi dual l y, as Per sonal Rep r esent at i ve, a s H ei rt o a nd on Beha l fofA l l Bene f i ci ar i es t o The Es t at e o fM abe l Phi l l i ps2

app ea l s f r om t he t r i al cou r t ’ s i nt er l ocu t or y or derco m pel l i ng bi ndi ng a r bi t r at i on. O n F e b rua ry 1 1 , 2 0 0 8 , w e se n t A p p e l l a n t a l e tter sta ti n g o u r c o n c e rn th a t w e m a y h a v e n o j u ri sd i c ti o n o v e r t h i s a p p e a l b e c a u se the o rde r do e s n o t ap p e a r t o b e a f in a l a p p e a la b le o r d e ro rju d g m e n t , n o rd o e s ita p p e a rt o b e a n a p p e a la b le i n te rl o c u to ry o rd e r. S ee T EX . C IV . P RA C . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51. 014 ( a) ( V er non Supp. 2007 ) ( l i st i ng a ppe al abl e i nt er l ocu t or y or der s) , § 171. 098 ( a) ( 1) ( al l ow i ng i nt er l ocutor y appeal s t o be t aken f r om or der s den yi ngan appl i cat i on t o com pel
a rb i tra ti o n ); Lehm ann v. Har- C on Cor p. , 39 S . W . 3d 191, 195 ( Te x. 2001 ) (p ro v i d i n g g e n e ra l ru l e th a t a n a p p e a l m a y b e ta k e n o n l y fro m a fi n a l j u d g m e n t). W e i ndi cat ed t hat t hi s cour tw oul d di sm i ss t hi s appeal i f w e di d not r ecei ve a r e s po ns e s ho w i ng g r ou nd s f orco nt i nu i ng t he a pp e a l b y Fe br ua r y 21, 2008 . W e r ecei ved no r esponse. A ccor di ngl y, because t he or deri s nei t hera f i nal j udg m ent noran app ea l abl e i nt er l ocu t or y or der , w e d i sm i ss t hi s app ea l f or w ant ofj ur i sd i ct i on. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .3 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f).

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL D : W A LKER; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, JJ. DEL I VERE D: M a r c h 13, 2008
§ 587.205 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *Official business.* The prohibitions contained in § 587.201(a) do not apply to transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government or the United Nations (including its Specialized Agencies, Programmes, Funds, and Related Organizations) by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
§ 552.502 Effect of license or other authorization. ( a ) No license or other authorization contained in this part, or otherwise issued by OFAC, authorizes or validates any transaction effected prior to the issuance of such license or other authorization, unless specifically provided in such license or authorization.
( b ) No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizes any transaction prohibited under this part unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license is issued by OFAC and specifically refers to this part. No regulation, ruling, instruction, or license referring to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any other part of this chapter unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license specifically refers to such part.
( c ) Any regulation, ruling, instruction, or license authorizing any transaction otherwise prohibited under this part has the effect of removing a prohibition contained in this part from the transaction, but only to the extent specifically stated by its terms. Unless the regulation, ruling, instruction, or license otherwise specifies, such an authorization does not create any right, duty, obligation, claim, or interest in, or with respect to, any property that would not otherwise exist under ordinary principles of law.
( d ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to supersede the requirements established under any other provision of law or to relieve a person from any requirement to obtain a license or other authorization from another department or agency of the U.S. Government in compliance with applicable laws and regulations subject to the jurisdiction of that department or agency. For example, exports of goods, services, or technical data that are not prohibited by this part or that do not require a license by OFAC nevertheless may require authorization by the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of State, or other agencies of the U.S. Government.
( e ) No license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
( f ) Any payment relating to a transaction authorized in or pursuant to this part that is routed through the U.S. financial system should reference the relevant OFAC general or specific license authorizing the payment to avoid the blocking or rejection of the transfer.
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ST. PETERSBURG, as Trustee, a Florida banking corporation, et al., Appellants, v. TELEPROMPTER CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeAssisted Schools...Abu Dhabi, UAE: American Community School of Abu Dhabi: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Abu Dhabi, UAE: American Community School of Abu Dhabi: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +971-2-681-5115 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: acs@acs.sch.ae | Website: www.acs.sch.ae 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Abu Dhabi- 2024 Special Needs Profile- UAE [295 KB]) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **American Community School of Abu Dhabi** (ACS) is a nonprofit American standards-based curriculum school serving approximately 1,200 students in KG1 through grade 12 who represent more than 80 countries. Founded in 1972 and led by our mission, vision and core values, we deliver excellence in our four pillars: academics, the arts, athletics and service learning. The school year comprises of two semesters extending from late August to December and from January to June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsUnited Arab Emirates

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast Fourth Street 
in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des-
ignated as the ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Lawrence 
King Federal Justice Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
#### LEIGH C. PALMER v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. 32969.

Decided January 8, 1917.]

Per Curiam :

This is a case of a lieutenant in the Navy who was ordered by the commander in chief of the United States Atlantic Fleet to report to a rear admiral commanding the Fourth Division of the Atlantic Fleet, and is claiming additional pay as aid to said rear admiral.

This officer was not nominated as aid to the Secretary of the Navy by the commander in chief of the United States Atlantic Fleet nor by the rear admiral commanding the Fourth Division of the fleet.

Under the decision in the case of *Knox*v. *United*States, *ante,*p. 22, the plaintiff was not legally appointed aid, and therefore can not recover for the additional pay claimed by him.

It is ordered that his petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
www.gpo.gov

### §1745. Special provisions for Miccosukee Tribe

#### (a) Exemption of leasehold from State and local taxes

The leasehold interest granted the Miccosukee Tribe under the Lease Agreement shall be exempt from all State and local taxes.

#### (b) Treatment of leasehold as Indian reservation

The lands leased to the Miccosukee Tribe pursuant to the Lease Agreement shall be treated as if such lands constituted a federally recognized Indian reservation solely for purposes of determining the eligibility of the Miccosukee Tribe and its members for any Federal health, education, employment, economic assistance, revenue sharing, law enforcement over Indians, or social welfare programs, or any other similar Federal program for which Indians are eligible because of their status as Indians and of their residence on an Indian reservation.

#### (c) Power of State of Florida to diminish leasehold interests for public purposes

The State of Florida, through exercise of the power of eminent domain, may take or diminish any interest granted to the Miccosukee Tribe under the Lease Agreement only for a public purpose and upon payment of just compensation, but such taking or diminution shall not require the approval of Congress or any executive officer of the United States.

#### (d) Impairment of benefits received by State of Florida under other provisions

Nothing in this part or in any grant of leasehold rights by the State of Florida under the Lease Agreement shall affect or otherwise impair in any adverse manner any benefits received by the State of Florida under the Act of September 2, 1937 (16 U.S.C. 669 et seq.), or the Act of August 9, 1950 (16 U.S.C. 777 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 97–399, §6, Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2014.)

#### References in Text

Act of September 2, 1937, referred to in subsec. (d), is act Sept. 2, 1937, ch. 899, 50 Stat. 917, as amended, popularly known as the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, which is classified generally to chapter 5B (§669 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 669 of Title 16 and Tables.

Act of August 9, 1950, referred to in subsec. (d), is act Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 658, 64 Stat. 430, as amended, popularly known as the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act and also as the Fish Restoration and Management Projects Act, which is classified generally to chapter 10B (§777 et seq.) of Title 16. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 777 of Title 16 and Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
its September 30, 2000 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-2000              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        274,339                  274,339
<SECURITIES>                                  334,329                  334,329
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,696                   34,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              643,364                  643,364
<PP&E>                                      3,803,639                3,803,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                827,661                  827,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,619,342                3,619,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          83,864                   83,864
<BONDS>                                             0                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0
<COMMON>                                            0                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,535,478                3,535,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,619,342                3,619,342
<SALES>                                       101,925                  306,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              111,152                  331,729
<CGS>                                               0                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               54,611                  184,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                56,541                  146,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            56,541                  146,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   56,541                  146,866
<EPS-BASIC>                                      3.27                     8.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    3.27                     8.50


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOR GE M AR TINEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-73015 Age n c y No. A094-318-047 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2015 ** B e fore : FARRIS, WARDLAW , a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Jorge M a rtine z , a native and c i tiz e n

of El Sa lva dor, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for withholding of re m ova l and prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture (“ C AT” ). Our jurisdic tion is 

# F IL ED MAR 19 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).gove rne d

by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c t ua l findings. Se e Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e dism i ss in pa

rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w . W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r M artine z ’ s c ha lle nge to the a ge n c y ’ s disc re tiona

ry de nia l of his a

pplic ation for volunta

ry de pa rture . Se e Esquiv e lGarc ia v . Holde r , 593 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th C ir. 2010). Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports both the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t M artine z fa ile d to e sta

blish a ne xus be t

we e n a ny ha rm he suffe re d a

nd fe a rs a nd a prote c te d ground, se e Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (a “ de sire to be fre e from . . . ra n dom viole nc e by

ga ng m e m be rs be ars no ne xus to a

prote c t e d ground” ), and the B IA’ s finding tha t he fa ile d to show it is m

ore like ly tha n not any ha rm would oc c ur, se e N

agoulk o v . IN S , 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th C i r. 2003) (future pe rse c ution too spe c ulative ). Thus, M artine z ’ s withholding of re m o va l c la im fa ils. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the B IA’ s de nia l of M a

rtine z ’ s C AT c la im be c a use he fa ile d to e s ta

blish it is m

ore like ly tha n not he would be torture d by or with thec onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e of the gove rnm e nt of El Sa lva dor if

1 0 - 7 3 0 1 5 2re turne d. Se e Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). Thus, M artine z ’ s C AT c la im

fa ils. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 0 - 7 3 0 1 5 3
National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy and Technology

Teleconference Agenda

Monday

, July 11 , 20 11

11 :00 a .m.

– 12 :3 0 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time

866

- 299

- 3188, Code: 202233006 8#

1201 Constitution Ave, NW

EPA East Building, Room 1132

Washing ton, DC 20004

Purpose: To discuss and approve NACEPT’s Draft Second Advice Letter on EPA Workforce

Planning: Leadership Capabilities and Culture for “One EPA” and Strategies to Obtain and

Retain Scientific and Technical Expertise

.

11 :00 a .m. Wel come a nd Introductions

 Mark Joyce, Acting NACEPT Designated Federal Officer

 Cynthia Jones

- Jackson, Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory

Committee Management and Outreach

11 :05 a .m. Ground R ules for Teleconference and Overview of Agenda

 Dr. James H. Joh nson, Jr., NACEPT Chair

11 :10 a .m. Overview of NACEPT Draft Second Workforce Advice Letter

 Howard Learner and Sara Kendall , NACEPT Workforce Workgroup Co

Chair s

11 :1 5 a .m. Public Comments on NACEPT Draft Recommendations

11 :30 a .m. Discussion and Ap proval of NACEPT Draft Second Workforce Advice

Letter

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.

, N ACEPT Chair

12 :30 p.m. ADJOURN
(Superior Court of Cincinnati.)

General Term.

#### ALBERT W. FISHER v. FISHER FOUNDRY *&*MACHINE COMPANY.

A judgment improperly obtained should not be vacated absolutely, but suspended until it has been adjudged that there is a valid defense to the action.

C. B. Mathews for plaintiff in error.

Wilby *&*Wald and Tugman *&*Baker, contra.

Murphy, J.;

Dempsey, J., and Smith, J., concur (Judge Smith basing his concurrence on grounds stated in a separate opinion).

The court below erred in vacating the judgment by default absolutely. . If that judgment was improperly obtained the court below should have suspended the same until it has been adjudged that there is a valid defense to the action. 24 O. S., 625; 46 O S., 639.

The scope of Mr. Tugman’s employment was' broad enough to justify him in entering an appearance for his client and consenting to the amendment to the petition. Therefore we find no irregularity in obtaining the judgment and no other reason why the judgment should have been vacated or suspended.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed.