alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 11, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Artisan Financial Corporation, Barrington, Illinois; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Valley Community Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Valley Community Bank, both of St. Charles, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 13, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19742 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Registrant's Consolidated Condensed Statement of Income and Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheet for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     $US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           157,800
<SECURITIES>                                     406,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    503,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     181,300
<INVENTORY>                                      145,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 965,000
<PP&E>                                           422,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                   278,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,189,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,063,100
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       28,800
<COMMON>                                            (300)
<OTHER-SE>                                       698,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,189,500
<SALES>                                        1,983,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,983,600
<CGS>                                          1,767,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,767,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 373,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  230,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                      79,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              150,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     150,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.39



</TABLE>
f12012ex10v_collabriumjapan.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 


COLLABRIUM JAPAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION


c/o Collabrium Advisors LLP


16 Old Bond Street


London W1S 4PS







_______________, 2012


Collabrium Advisors LLP


16 Old Bond Street


London W1S 4PS







Eureka Company Limited


[Address]







Ladies and Gentlemen:







This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Collabrium Japan Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the liquidation of the Company’s trust account (defined below) (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Collabrium Advisors LLP and Eureka Company Limited shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at the addresses set forth above (or any successor location).  In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay to each of Collabrium Advisors LLP and Eureka Company Limited the sum of $3,750 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.  Each of the undersigned hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


 




	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	COLLABRIUM JAPAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	 	 
	 	 	Name 	 
	 	 	Title 	 
	 	 	 	 









 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:







Collabrium Advisors LLP


 



	 	 	 
	
By: 

	 	 
	 	Name 	 
	 	Title 	 
	 	 	 










Eureka Company Limited


 




	 	 	 
	
By: 

	 	 
	 	Name 	 
	 	Title
#### Mills *v.*Kutter et al.

[No. 20,384.

Filed October 26, 1965.]

*Gray & Waddle,*of Petersburg, and *Emison & Emison,*of Vincennes, for appellant.

*Harvey K. Ramsey, Ramsey & Ramsey,*and *Shake & Lewis,*of Vincennes, for appellees.

*7On Motion to Dismiss

Bierly, C. J.

On October 8, 1965, the Honorable Carl M. Gray, of the firm of Gray & Waddle, Petersburg, Indiana, filed in this cause a motion entitled “APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CAUSE OF ACTION”, praying therein that this cause of action be dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Appellant also filed on said date a certification by Carl M. Gray that he delivered, by United States Mail, a copy of said motion to dismiss to Shake & Lewis, Attorneys, 305 Busseron Street, Vincennes, Indiana, counsel for appellees.

Appellees have not filed an assignment of cross-errors nor any objections to said motion.

And the court, having examined said motion and proof of notice and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said motion should be sustained.

And the court now dismisses such cause of action with costs taxed against appellant.

Cause of action dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 211 N. E. 2d 49.
#### In the Interest of D. J. P., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-227.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 8, 1980.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Mitchell J. Beers, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Edwin H. Duff, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

DAUKSCH, Chief Judge.

This ease is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the authority of *In the Interest of*
      *1095
      *R. J. B.,*No. 79-242/T4-383 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 17,1980).

CASE DISMISSED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, January 27, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider a personnel matter and matters relating to the Corporation's resolution and supervisory activities. 

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John M. Reich (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), and concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), Director John C. Dugan (Director, Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)). 

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

Dated: January 27, 2009. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E9-2058 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### LINCOLN C. ANDREWS v. THE UNITED STATES.

[49 O. Cls. R„ 391; 240 U. S. R., 90.]

*On the defendants' appeal.*

At a former trial of this case the petition was dismissed, and it will be found fully reported in 47 C. Gls., page 51. The plaintiff makes a motion for a new trial, alleging error of law, and *486after further and more consideration of the legal question involved, a new trial is granted and a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff under authority of the case of *Glavey*v. *United States,*187 XT. S., 595.

The decision of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice White

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 21,1916.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.45 Supplements, amendments, or revisions.

The Secretary may, at any time, prescribe additional supplemental, amendatory or revised regulations with respect to securities, including charges and fees for the maintenance and servicing of securities in book-entry form.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

515 

CAF 10-00148 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF RICHANDA J. BULSON, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

DAVID R. GRINNELL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

PAUL M. DEEP, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E.

Shkane, J.), entered March 18, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 4. The order found respondent to be in willful

violation of an order of support. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 11221 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Hugh Michael Glenn,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 447

- 1

Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Hugh Michael Glenn , federal prisoner # 09541

- 078 , seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (i) motion for compassionate release. The district court denied Glenn’s § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion based solely upon its consideration

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the lim ited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 24, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-11221 Document: 00516253308 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2022No. 20

- 11221

2 of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693

- 94 (5th Cir. 2020)

. Glenn’s disagreement with the district court’s § 3553 (a) analysis is not a sufficient ground for reversal. See id. at 6 94. Because he fails to identify a nonfrivolous argument for appeal , Glenn’s IFP motion is DENIED , and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS

. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 20-11221 Document: 00516253308 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2022
Order entered December 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00861-CR

No. 05-20-00862-CR

RAYAN DHANES GANESH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-76113-S & F16-76111-S

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 18, 2020 first motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER 

appellant’s brief due by January 19, 2021.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1842. ORR v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL, the

same is hereby GRANTED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/12/2015

August 12, 2015
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of ServicerCompliance (Item 1123)**

** **

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of March 1, 2017 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Associationas Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and asTrustee relating to the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2017-GS5, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GS5 **(GSMS 2017-GS5)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects forthe Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,576]


SGL Carbon, LLC, A Subsidiary of SGL Group--The Carbon Company 
Including On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower and Reflex Services, St. 
Marys, PA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on April 21, 2009, applicable to workers of SGL 
Carbon, LLC, a subsidiary of SGL Group--The Carbon Company, St. Marys, 
Pennsylvania. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 
7, 2009 (74 FR 21407).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of carbon and graphite products.
    New information provided by the company shows that workers leased 
from Manpower and Reflex Services were employed on-site at SGL Carbon, 
LLC, a subsidiary of SGL Group--The Carbon Company, St. Marys, 
Pennsylvania.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers at the subject firm who were adversely affected by the shift in 
production of carbon and graphite products to Germany.
    The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of SGL Carbon, LLC, to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from working on-site at the St. 
Marys, Pennsylvania location of the subject firm. The amended notice 
applicable to TA-W-65,576 is hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of SGL Carbon, LLC, a subsidiary of SGL Group--The 
Carbon Company, St. Marys, Pennsylvania, including on-site leased 
workers from Manpower and Reflex Staffing, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after March 11, 2008 
through April 21, 2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 30th day of July 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-20449 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 18

November 9, 2001

The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
Reader's Digest Road
Pleasantville, NY  10570-7000

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the Form 10-Q of The Reader's Digest
Association, Inc. ("the Company") as of and for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2001, and have read the Company's statements in Note 6 to the
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included therein. As stated in Note
6, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventories at certain
subsidiaries from the last-in, first-out method to the first-in, first-out
method. The Company believes that the new method of accounting for inventories
is preferable because it provides consistency in accounting for inventories that
are being managed globally as a result of its worldwide system implementation
project and it better measures the current value of such inventories and
provides a more accurate reflection of its financial position. At your request,
we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances,
business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in
the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited (i) any financial statements of the Company as of any date
or for any period subsequent to June 30, 2001, (ii) the information set forth in
the aforementioned Note 6 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements,
nor (iii) the as restated Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements as of June
30, 2001 and for the three-month period ended September 30, 2001 included in the
aforementioned Form 10-Q. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning
the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG LLP
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Velocity Financial, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-236019) on Form S-8 of Velocity Financial, Inc. of our report dated April 7, 2020, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Velocity Financial, Inc. (formerly known as Velocity Financial, LLC)  and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, members’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2019 annual report on Form 10-K of Velocity Financial, Inc.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, CaliforniaApril 7, 2020