42650 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 162 / Monday, August 24, 2009 / Notices 

Export Co.; Huludao Steel Pipe 

Industrial Co., Ltd.; Huludao City Steel 

Pipe; Benxi Northern Steel Pipes Co.; 

and Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe Co. On 

the same date, U.S. Steel requested the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of the following producers of 

subject merchandise: Husteel; Hyundai 

HYSCO; Nexteel; Samsun; and Seah. 

On December 24, 2008, the 

Department initiated an administrative 

review covering the period November 1, 

2007, through October 31, 2008. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 79055 (December 24, 2008). 

Wheatland withdrew its request for a 

review of Kumkang on July 31, 2009. 

Wheatland is the only party to have 

requested a review of Kumkang. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review or. 

The Department may extend this 

deadline if it determines that it is 

reasonable to do so. Although 

Wheatland withdrew its request for 

Kumkang after the 90-day period, the 

Department has not to date dedicated 

extensive time and resources to this 

review, only having recently issued a 

supplemental questionnaire to 

Kumkang. Therefore, in response to 

Wheatland’s request, the Department 

hereby rescinds the administrative 

review for the period November 1, 2007, 

through October 31, 2008, for Kumkang. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the companies 

for which this review is rescinded, the 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

partial rescission of administrative 

review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 18, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E4–20321 Filed 8–21–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Federal Consistency Appeal by Villa 

Marina Yacht Harbour, Inc. 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

ACTION: Notice of appeal. 

SUMMARY: This announcement provides 

notice that Villa Marina Yacht Harbour, 

Inc. (Villa Marina) has filed an 

administrative appeal with the 

Department of Commerce requesting 

that the Secretary override the Puerto 

Rico Planning Board’s (PRPB) objection 

to the proposed expansion of an existing 

marina in Fajardo, Puerto Rico. 

DATES: Comments must be sent to the 

NOAA, Office of the General Counsel 

for Ocean postmarked or e-mailed no 

later than September 30, 2009. Requests 

for a public hearing must be filed within 

30 days of publication of this notice. 

ADDRESSES: Materials from the appeal 

record will be available at the NOAA, 

Office of the General Counsel for Ocean 

Services, 1305 East-West Highway, 

Room 6111, Silver Spring, MD 20910 

and on the following Web site: http:// 

www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gladys P. Miles, Attorney-Advisor, 

NOAA, Office of the General Counsel, 

301–713–7384 or at 

gcos.inquiries@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Notice of Appeal 

Villa Marina has filed notice of an 

appeal with the Secretary of Commerce 

(Secretary), pursuant to the Coastal 

Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA), 

16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and 

implementing regulations found at 15 

CFR Part 930, Subpart H. The appeal is 

taken from an objection by PRPB to 

Villa Marina’s consistency certification 

for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

permit for a marina expansion in 

Fajardo, Puerto Rico. 

Under the CZMA, the Secretary may 

override PRPB’s objection on grounds 

that the proposed activity is consistent 

with the objectives or purposes of the 

CZMA or otherwise necessary in the 

interest of national security. To make 

the determination that the proposed 

activity is ‘‘consistent with the 

objectives or purposes’’ of the CZMA, 

the Secretary must find that: (1) The 

proposed activity furthers the national 

interest as articulated in sections 302 or 

303 of the CZMA, in a significant or 

substantial manner; (2) the adverse 

effects of the proposed activity do not 

outweigh its contribution to the national 

interest, when those effects are 

considered separately or cumulatively; 

and (3) no reasonable alternative is 

available that would permit the activity 

to be conducted in a manner consistent 

with enforceable policies of the PRPB’s 

coastal management program. 15 CFR 

930.121. Conversely, to make the 

determination that the proposed activity 

is ‘‘necessary in the interest of national 

security,’’ the Secretary must find that a 

national defense or other national 

security interest would be significantly 

impaired were the activity not permitted 

to go forward as proposed. 15 CFR 

930.122. 

II. Opportunity for Federal Agency and 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to Department of Commerce 

regulations, the public and interested 

Federal agencies may submit comments 

on this appeal. Written comments must 

be sent no later than September 30, 2009 

to the NOAA, Office of the General 

Counsel for Ocean Services, 1305 EastWest Highway, Room 6111, Silver 

Spring, MD 20910 or via e-mail to 

gcos.comments@noaa.gov. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 162 / Monday, August 24, 2009 / Notices 42651 

III. Opportunity for a Public Hearing 

Pursuant to Department of Commerce 

regulations, the Secretary may hold a 

public hearing on this appeal, either in 

response to a request for a public 

hearing or upon his own initiative. A 

request for a public hearing must be 

filed with the Secretary within 30 days 

of the publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. If a hearing is held, it 

shall be noticed in the Federal Register, 

and the Secretary shall reopen the 

public and Federal agency comment 

period for a 10-day period following the 

hearing. Requests for a public hearing 

must be sent to the NOAA, Office of the 

General Counsel for Ocean Services, 

1305 East-West Highway, Room 6111, 

Silver Spring, MD 20910 or via e-mail 

to gcos.comments@noaa.gov. 

IV. Appeal Documents 

NOAA intends to provide the public 

with access to all publicly available 

materials and related documents 

comprising the appeal record on the 

following Web site: http:// 

www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm; and during 

business hours, at the NOAA, Office of 

the General Counsel for Ocean Services. 

For additional information concerning 

this appeal, please contact Gladys P. 

Miles, Attorney-Advisor, NOAA, Office 

of the General Counsel, 301–713–7393 

or gcos.inquiries@noaa.gov. 

Dated: August 19, 2009. 

Joel La Bissonniere, 

Assistant General Counsel for Ocean Services. 

[Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog 

No. {XX.XXX} Coastal Zone 

Management Program Assistance.] 

[FR Doc. E9–20318 Filed 8–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Final Management Plan and 

Environmental Assessment for 

Thunder Bay National Marine 

Sanctuary: Notice of Public Availability 

AGENCY: Office of National Marine 

Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean 

Service (NOS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Department of Commerce (DOC). 

ACTION: Notice of public availability. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

304(e) of the National Marine 

Sanctuaries Act (NMSA), as amended, 

NOAA is releasing the Final 

Management Plan and Environmental 

Assessment for Thunder Bay National 

Marine Sanctuary. 

DATES: The Final Management Plan and 

Environmental Assessment for Thunder 

Bay National Marine Sanctuary will be 

available on August 25, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy: For a 

copy of the Final Management Plan and 

Environmental Assessment, please 

contact Tera Panknin, Management Plan 

Review Coordinator, Thunder Bay 

National Marine Sanctuary, 500 W. 

Fletcher Street, Alpena, MI 49707; (989) 

356–8805 ext. 38; or via e-mail at 

TBMPR@noaa.gov. Copies can also be 

downloaded from the Thunder Bay 

NMS Web site at http:// 

thunderbay.noaa.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tera 

Panknin at (989) 356–8805 ext. 38 or via 

e-mail at TBMPR@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background Information 

Thunder Bay was designated in 2000 

as the nation’s thirteenth national 

marine sanctuary. It is jointly managed 

by NOAA and the State of Michigan. It 

was designated to preserve nationally 

significant shipwrecks and regional 

maritime landscape through resource 

protection, education, and research. 

Thunder Bay NMS’s first management 

plan review began in September 2006 

with public scoping meetings, followed 

by meetings of working groups made up 

of sanctuary staff, sanctuary advisory 

council members, and members of the 

public to developed action plans of the 

management plan. 

NOAA released a draft revised 

management plan on February 24, 2009 

(74 FR 8231) and accepted comments 

through April 10, 2009. During this 

time, NOAA held four public meetings 

in Rogers City, MI (March 18, 2009), 

Harrisville, MI (March 19, 2009), 

Lansing, MI (March 20, 2009), and 

Alpena, MI (March 24, 2009). A total of 

24 people provided oral comments at 

those meetings, and 23 people 

submitted written comments on the 

draft revised management plan for a 

total of 61 individual comments. Each of 

these comments are addressed in the 

Response to Comments document. 

II. Summary of the Final Management 

Plan 

The core of the Final Management 

Plan is four action plans: Resource 

Protection, Education and Outreach, 

Research, and Sanctuary Operations and 

Administration. Each is summarized 

below: 

A. Resource Protection Action Plan 

This action plan involves considering 

the need for boundary expansion, 

assessing recreational use of the 

sanctuary, increasing compliance with 

regulations, fostering greater awareness 

of the sanctuary by recreational users, 

and preserving maritime heritage 

artifacts. 

B. Education and Outreach Action Plan 

The second action plan involves 

developing education material for a 

broader audience, increasing awareness 

of the sanctuary through education 

programs, enhancing sanctuary 

communications with other entities, 

maintaining a sanctuary presence in the 

community, and maximizing the effects 

of education through ongoing 

evaluation. 

C. Research Action Plan 

The third action plan involves 

characterizing the sanctuary’s maritime 

heritage resources and landscape 

features, developing a monitoring 

program for sanctuary maritime heritage 

sites, continuing partnership with 

Alpena County Public Library to 

manage the Thunder Bay Sanctuary 

Research Collection, developing 

partnerships with local, national, and 

international researchers and 

organizations, and utilizing volunteers, 

fellows, students, and interns for 

sanctuary characterization, research, 

and monitoring. 

D. Sanctuary Operations and 

Administration Action Plan 

The fourth and final action plan 

involves developing infrastructure to 

enhance and maintain the Great Lakes 

Maritime Heritage Center and for 

research vessels, equipment, and field 

operations; hiring staff; enhancing 

operation of the Thunder Bay Sanctuary 

Advisory Council; and developing 

procedures to ensure safety for staff and 

sanctuary visitors. 

III. Environmental Assessment 

NOAA prepared an environmental 

assessment that analyzes the 

environmental impacts of the revised 

management plan pursuant to the 

National Environmental Policy Act. In 

doing so, the environmental assessment 

analyzes two alternatives: The status 

quo (no change to the 1999 management 

plan) and the preferred alternative 

(revising the 1999 management plan). 

Included with the environmental 

assessment is NOAA’s finding of no 

significant impact. 

Dated: August 17, 2009. 

Daniel J. Basta, 

Director, Office of National Marine 

Sanctuaries. 

[FR Doc. E9–20332 Filed 8–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES