[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42673-42674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Request for Information Relevant to the Regionalization of 
Emergency Medical Care Delivery Systems and Demonstration Model 
Development

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a time-sensitive Request for Information (RFI) issued 
by the Emergency Care Coordination Center in the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response on behalf of the 
Council on Emergency Medical Care (CEMC) and the Federal Interagency 
Committee on Emergency Medical Services (FICEMS)--collectively known as 
the Emergency Care Enterprise (ECE). The information requested is meant 
to ascertain key concepts, best practices, and operational approaches 
to support regionalized, comprehensive and accountable emergency care 
and trauma systems. The information will be analyzed by the ECCC to 
help guide the development of demonstration programs that design and 
evaluate innovative models of regionalized, coordinated and accountable 
emergency care and trauma systems.

ADDRESSES: Responses to this RFI may be submitted electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdd8dededefdd5d5ce93dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f0a0c0c0c2f07071c41080019">[email protected]</span></a> by COB September 30th 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this RFI or 
the Emergency Care Coordination Center (ECCC), please contact Melicia 
Seay, Program Analyst, by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c212920252f252d623f292d350c24243f622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e18c848d88828880cf92848098a1898992cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 
202-260-1383.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Emergency Care Coordination Center 
(ECCC) was created in order to: (1) Lead an enterprise to promote and 
fund research in emergency medicine and trauma health care, (2) promote 
regional partnerships and more effective emergency medical systems in 
order to enhance appropriate triage, distribution, and care of routine 
community patients, and (3) promote local, regional, and State 
emergency medical systems' preparedness for and response to public 
health events. The office addresses the full spectrum of issues that 
have impact on care in hospital emergency departments, encompassing the 
complete continuum of patient care from the pre-hospital environment to 
disposition from emergency or trauma care. The Office coordinates with 
existing executive departments and agencies that perform functions 
relating to emergency medical systems in order to ensure unified 
strategy, policy, and implementation.
    The issue of regionalization is one of great interest across 
academic and clinical communities and is frequently touted as a 
potential solution to healthcare reform. The Future of Emergency Care 
reports published by the Institute of Medicine in 2006 recommended the 
establishment of a demonstration program to promote coordinated, 
regionalized, and accountable emergency care delivery systems. As 
demonstrated by existing systems for trauma, cardiac arrest, and stroke 
patients, regionalized emergency care systems help get the right 
patients to the right hospitals in the right amount of time, improve 
patient outcomes, and reduce costs. These systems typically require 
careful coordination amongst 9-1-1 dispatch, pre-hospital emergency 
medical services, EMS system medical direction, categorization/
designation of medical facilities, interfacility transfer protocols, 
data collection/analysis, and ongoing system-wide quality improvement.
    Yet regionalization of emergency care remains poorly defined and 
often misunderstood, with competing definitions, a variety of 
organizational and financial structures, and a lack of understanding 
regarding the implementation, evaluation, feasibility, and long term 
consequences of regional emergency care. Even amongst the State Trauma 
Systems, for instance, there is wide-scale variability in terms of 
resourcing mechanisms, support levels, functionality, and systems-wide 
interoperability. While some states have data mechanisms in place to 
monitor emergency care system status including medical facility bed 
availability and patient tracking, these systems vary in terms of 
management, sophistication and purpose, often collecting and reporting 
different data without uniform data definitions or agreement on which 
data should be collected.
    The ECCC, in coordination with the CEMC and FICEMS, aims to 
demonstrate model systems for Emergency Care through the development of 
regionalization demonstration projects that will provide information 
and lessons learned while generating guidance for the nationwide 
deployment of regionalized and accountable emergency care delivery 
systems.

Issues on Which Information Is Requested

    The ECCC seeks input regarding regionalization of emergency care, 
with a focus on identification of the challenges and opportunities that 
could be addressed through federally funded national demonstration 
projects. The scope of emergency care being considered is defined as 
beginning with an event, disease, or condition that causes an 
individual to seek care through EMS or in an ED setting and ending with 
departure from the ED (either by admission to another hospital 
department, through discharge from the ED, or via transfer to another 
hospital).
    We welcome your comments, research findings, and/or practical 
experience on the following topics that can be used both to enhance our 
knowledge of regional emergency care networks and to help formulate 
guidance and strategies for potential Federal programs to develop 
regional emergency care systems. Please provide concise responses in 
the context of regionalization to any or all of the following topics.
    A. Existing Models. Please describe existing trauma or EMS regions 
in terms of characteristics such as: overall structure and 
organization, boundaries and geography, governance or oversight 
mechanisms and authorities, triage-transfer protocols, sustained 
financial support and provider reimbursement, data collection 
procedures, resource tracking, and communication/coordination of 
relationships amongst State leadership, 9-1-1 services and/or EMS 
system medical direction, individual regions, etc. If desired, include 
opinions regarding the overall functioning and effectiveness of 
existing systems.
    B. Analysis of Current Practices in Regionalized Clinical Care. 
Whether at the local, State, or inter-State level, please provide 
suggestions and justifications as to which existing systems or specific 
elements of regionalized care models specifically merit further 
investigation, development, or targeted alteration and which clinical 
conditions are most suitable to regionalized care delivery. Please 
provide specific evidence where available and applicable.
    C. Communications Infrastructure. Please provide information on 
appropriate data elements that should be incorporated within 
regionalization systems to provide for situational

[[Page 42674]]

awareness on resource availability. List the measurable variables and 
data elements that you believe need to be defined and captured in order 
to effectively support regional delivery of care. Also include any 
suggestions as to which common data elements, at a minimum, should be 
included within a standardized data language to facilitate, encourage, 
and improve the support and integration of the various state resource 
tracking mechanisms.
    D. Opportunities and challenges in regionalized care delivery. 
Please share your opinions on the potential benefits, obstacles, 
drawbacks, and consequences (both intended and unintended) of 
regionalized healthcare models, providing specific evidence where 
feasible. If possible, elaborate on the effects regionalization may 
produce on providers' financial viability, patient access to care, 
healthcare service utilization rates, disaster preparedness efforts, 
and response capabilities.
    E. Evaluation of regionalized care delivery systems. Please provide 
comments on how regionalized care systems can be objectively assessed 
and evaluated, including suggestions on appropriate measures of 
programmatic success or failure and opinions on which data sources 
could be used to establish compliance with regional performance 
benchmarks. Where possible, also list measurable ways to assess 
regionalization's impact with regard to health outcomes, including 
factors such as morbidity and mortality, time-to-care, condition-
specific treatment, quality of care, patient safety, etc.
    F. Adaptation of regionalization to emergency medical care. Given 
the legal requirement to screen and stabilize ED patients, the need for 
time-sensitive, high-quality care in emergency settings, and the 
diversity of patient populations and geographic locations, please 
provide insights or commentary on how the concept of regionalization 
could be adapted and/or customized to fit the unique aspects of 
emergency medical care.
    G. Additional information. Please provide any additional opinions, 
suggestions, or comments as to how the ECCC and the Emergency Care 
Enterprise can shape demonstration projects of regionalized, 
coordinated, and accountable systems of emergency care to effectively 
utilize limited resources, facilitate information management and flow, 
increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the emergency healthcare 
delivery system, and enhance the overall quality of care provided.
    Please indicate which type of institution or organization you are 
primarily affiliated with (using the following categories):
    <bullet> Academia;
    <bullet> Small Business;
    <bullet> Healthcare Facility;
    <bullet> Trauma or EMSS region;
    <bullet> Federal Government;
    <bullet> State Government;
    <bullet> Healthcare Professional;
    <bullet> Patient Advocacy Group;
    <bullet> Other (briefly define).
    This request for information is for planning purposes only and 
shall not be interpreted as a solicitation for applications or as an 
obligation on the part of the government. The government will not pay 
for the preparation of any information submitted or for the 
government's use of that information.

    Dated: August 14, 2009.
Nicole Lurie,
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Rear Admiral, U.S. 
Public Health Service.
 [FR Doc. E9-20162 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-37-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>