alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Richard D. Crowley, Jr. of Integrated Device
Technology, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, certify to my knowledge that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                                                                             
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ RICHARD D. CROWLEY, JR.                                                                                 
|Date: June 6, 2011 |  | Richard D. Crowley, Jr.
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 576.313 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 31 7 . STEVEN HARPER v . THE STATE.

Aft er p l ead in g g u i l t y , St ev en H arp er fi led a m ot i o n t o v acat e a vo i d sen t en ce,

arg u i n g t h at t h e St at e fai led t o p ro v i d e h i m p r o p er n ot i ce o f i t s in t en t t o s eek

reci di v i s t sen t en c i n g

. On Decem b er 1 3

, 2 0 18

, th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n.
Harp er fi l ed an ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s c r e t i o n a r y ap peal fro m t h i s ord er o n J an u ary 1 7,

2 0 1 9 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i on

. An ap p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i o n ary ap p e a l m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e

en t ry o f t h e o rd er o r j u d gm en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o nal

, an d th i s Co urt can n o t accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi t h

. See Bo yl e v. S ta t e , 1 9 0 Ga.

Ap p

. 73 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 57 ) (1 9 89 ). Becau s e H arp er’ s ap p l i cat io n was fi l ed 3 5 d ay s aft er

en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s t o ap p eal

, i t i s u n t i m el y

. W e t h us l ack ju ri s di ct io n o v er t h i s

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 14, 2019

02/14/2019
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO LUNA, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00037-CR

Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 5

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # F-1162422-L)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)

(Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
#### Arthur MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.W. MORRIS, Warden, Federal Transfer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America, ex rel, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 00-6189, 00-6220.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2001.

Before BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

*547PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of these appeals. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant Arthur Morrison, a federal prisoner representing himself, appeals from orders of the district court that dismissed his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, denied his motion for reconsideration, and denied his motion for release on bail and for permission to conduct interrogatories. He has filed motions in this court for release pending appeal and for an evidentiary hearing on the bail motion, to dismiss counsel as well as a reply to his attorney’s response moving to withdraw, to file an oversize reply brief, to supplement his reply brief, and a letter-affidavit which requests that his issues be adjudicated forthwith.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm. As we have repeatedly explained to appellant, his challenges to the legality of his conviction and sentence must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where he was sentenced. *See Morrison v. Pugh,*No. 98-1455, 1999 WL 176144 (10th Cir. Mar.31, 1999) (unpublished); *Morrison v. Pugh,*No. 98-1278, 1998 WL 704670 (10th Cir. Oct.2, 1998) (unpublished); *Morrison v. Guzik,*Nos. 97-6351, 97-6416, 1998 WL 380539 (10th Cir. June 30, 1998) (unpublished).

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s motion to dismiss counsel and appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw are granted. Appellant’s other motions are denied. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
Opinion issued May 16 , 201 3

In The



## Court of Appeals

For The



## First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01

- 12

- 00710

- CV

____________

RICKEY B. NEWELL , Appellant

V.

LITTON LOAN SERVICING LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 165 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 13020A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. They represent

that they have reached an agreement regarding the matters in this case and request2 th at we render judgment in accordance with their agreement, or alternatively, set

aside the trial court’ s ju dgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Accordingly, w e grant the mo tion, set aside the trial court’ s judgment without

regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Se e id.

We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Ke yes, Higley , and Bland

.
#### § 409.1 Standard.

In granting or denying a request for a security clearance made in response to an application for a White House press pass, officials of the Secret Service will be guided solely by the principle of whether the applicant presents a potential source of physical danger to the President and/or the family of the President so serious as to justify his or her exclusion from White House press privileges.

[43 FR 26718, June 22, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       97
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,119
<PP&E>                                             260
<DEPRECIATION>                                     435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,136
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,822)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,008
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,076)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
§ 589.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 589.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 589.407 :
*See also* § 589.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** ** 

** ** 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

  

In connection with the Annual Report of Chee Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A  for the year ended January 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jiang Da Wei, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

 

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

 

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

** ** 

  

  

 

 

 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 December 21, 2018.                                             By:

**/S/                                                                     **Jiang Da Wei

  

 

Name:              Jiang Da Wei

  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Title: President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

     (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(14)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(14)

1 January 1996

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

CAREER PROFILE SUPPLEMENT -

LAW

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           | Oasis Online Technologies Corp.                                                            |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| March 13, 2012 | /s/ Eric Click                                                                                       |
| By:            | Eric Click                                                                                           |
| Its:           | DirectorSecretaryTreasurerChief Financial OfficerChief Operating OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6735]

      ( print page 42356)    
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State and delegated to me, including under the Andean Counterdrug Programs section of the Department of State Foreign Operations and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009, (Division H, Pub. L. 111-8), I hereby determine and certify that: (1) The herbicide used for aerial eradication of illicit crops in Colombia is being used in accordance with EPA label requirements for comparable use in the United States and in accordance with Colombian laws; (2) the herbicide, in the manner it is being used, does not pose unreasonable risks or adverse effects to humans or the environment including endemic species; and (3) complaints of harm to health or licit crops caused by such aerial eradication are thoroughly evaluated and fair compensation is being paid in a timely manner for meritorious claims.

                    This certification shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.                

Dated: August 7, 2009. 

William J. Burns,

Under Secretary for Political Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-20147 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-17-P
# Armenia

242 items

        -    Report  		Armenia	  June 29, 2017 
        -    Report  		Armenia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (17-627) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Armenia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (11-729) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technological Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  July 29, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (11-114) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Prevention of Proliferation of Technology, Pathogens and Expertise That Could Be Used In the Development of Biological Weapons	  January 14, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (10-311.1) – Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation	  March 11, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (09-616) – Air Transport Agreement	  June 16, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (06-1016) – Agreement on Employment of Dependents of Members of Diplomatic Missions and Consular Posts	  October 16, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Armenia (05-317) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  March 17, 2005 

previous page1…22232425next page

Back to Top
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs – Work by Country...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: The Bahamas Summary

# 									Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: The Bahamas Summary							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) works to keep Americans safe at home by countering international crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad. INL helps countries deliver justice and fairness by strengthening their police, courts, and corrections systems. These efforts reduce the amount of crime and illegal drugs reaching U.S. shores.

**Challenges**

Located 47 nautical miles east of Miami, Florida, The Bahamas is a prime shipping route for transnational criminal organizations to traffic drugs and firearms, and smuggle migrants. To counter these threats, INL assistance provided under the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) aims to increase the Royal Bahamas Police Force (RBPF)’s law enforcement and counternarcotics capabilities to enhance their ability to control The Bahamas’s vast maritime territory. 

**Goals**

The United States maintains a well-established security partnership with The Bahamas, with  military and federal law enforcement participating in Operation Bahamas, Turks and Caicos (OPBAT), a decades-old trilateral counternarcotics operation among the United States, The Bahamas, and Turks and Caicos. On the U.S. side, the U.S. Coast Guard, Drug Enforcement Administration, and Department of State lead this engagement. INL also works to promote criminal justice sector reform and build forensic capacity. INL supports The Bahamas’s efforts to establish a legislative framework and an organizational structure to address corruption and financial crime, issues closely connected with transnational criminal activities.  

**Accomplishments****:**
        - INL Builds Bahamian Maritime Interdiction Capacity:   To help intercept criminal threats between the United States and the Caribbean Basin, INL donated four high perform ance marine interception boats.  Between 2013-2019, these vessels  participated in  numerous intelligence-driven interdiction operations under OPBAT, resulting in the seizure of nearly eight metric tons of cocaine. These seiz ur es are significant since the narcotic is often smuggled to the United States through this region in 1-5 kilogram amounts.  
        - U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Training Builds Bahamian Maritime Interdiction Capacity :  In 2019, a USCG Mobile Training Team (MTT) delivered a Boarding Officer Course for the Bahamas Customs Marine Unit. This was the fourth of eight courses in a three-year agreement between INL and the USCG. Future training will focus on increasing Bahamian operational capacity to participate in OPBAT. In 2019, OPBAT seized 219  metric tons  of illegal drugs, exceeding total seizures in the prior year by 775%.  

Tags

CrimeDrugsLaw EnforcementNarcoticsThe Bahamas

Back to Top
#### § 544.401 Reference to amended sections.

Except as otherwise specified, reference to any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or to any regulation, ruling, order, instruction, directive, or license issued pursuant to this part refers to the same as currently amended.
#### Mary QUINLAN and Raymond Quinlan, her husband, Appellants, v. Stanley MOTT, as Father and Natural Guardian of John Mott, a minor, the Edward J. DeBartolo Corporation, d/b/a Altamonte Mall, Appellees. Ann WELTMAN and Frank Weltman, her husband, Appellants, v. Stanley MOTT, as Father and Natural Guardian of John Mott, a minor, and the Edward J. DeBartolo Corporation, a foreign corporation, d/b/a Altamonte Mall, Appellees.

Nos. 79-714/T 4-474; 79-715/T 4-474A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 6, 1979.

James 0. Cunningham, Law Offices of Fisher & Matthews, Altamonte Springs, for appellants.

David C. Chafin, Orlando, for appellee, The Edward J. DeBartolo Corp., d/b/a The Altamonte Mall.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint without leave to amend. It is apparent the deficiencies in the complaint can probably be cured by amendment without any essential departure from the facts already alleged. Thus, although the trial court correctly granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss, the order should have been with leave to amend. *Florida Rules of Civil Procedure*1.190. *Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc.,*202 So.2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, JAMES C., and BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judges, concur.