alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 547.512 Authorizing Certain Transactions in Support of Nongovernmental Organizations' Activities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the activities described in paragraph (b) of this section by a nongovernmental organization are authorized, provided that the nongovernmental organization is not a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part.
( b ) The activities referenced in paragraph (a) of this section are non-commercial activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population that fall into one of the following categories: ( 1 ) Activities to support humanitarian projects to meet basic human needs, including disaster, drought, or flood relief; food, nutrition, or medicine distribution; the provision of health services; assistance for vulnerable or displaced populations, including individuals with disabilities and the elderly; and environmental programs;
( 2 ) Activities to support democracy building, including activities to support rule of law, citizen participation, government accountability and transparency, human rights and fundamental freedoms, access to information, and civil society development projects;
( 3 ) Activities to support education, including combating illiteracy, increasing access to education, international exchanges, and assisting education reform projects;
( 4 ) Activities to support non-commercial development projects directly benefiting civilians, including those related to health, food security, and water and sanitation;
( 5 ) Activities to support environmental and natural resource protection, including the preservation and protection of threatened or endangered species, responsible and transparent management of natural resources, and the remediation of pollution or other environmental damage; and
( 6 ) Activities to support disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and conflict resolution programs.
( c ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
( d ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize nongovernmental or other entities to engage in other activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population, including support for the removal of landmines and economic development projects directly benefiting the civilian population.
Note 1 to § 547.512 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78488, Dec. 21, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2660 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                    September 24, 1996.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2660) entitled ``An Act to increase the amount authorized to be 
appropriated to the Department of the Interior for the Tensas River 
National Wildlife Refuge.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Page 2, after line 12 insert:

SEC. 2. BAYOU SAUVAGE URBAN NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Refuge Expansion.--Section 502(b)(1) of the Emergency Wetlands 
Resources Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-645; 100 Stat. 3590), is amended 
by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``In addition, the 
Secretary may acquire, within such period as may be necessary, an area 
of approximately 4,228 acres, consisting of approximately 3,928 acres 
located north of Interstate 10 between Little Woods and Pointe-aux-
Herbes and approximately 300 acres south of Interstate 10 between the 
Maxent Canal and Michoud Boulevard that contains the Big Oak Island 
archaeological site, as depicted on the map entitled ``Bayou Sauvage 
Urban National Wildlife Refuge Expansion'', dated August, 1996, on file 
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.''.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to increase the 
        amount authorized to be appropriated to the Department of the 
        Interior for the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge, and for 
        other purposes.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2660

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
§ 7.465-2 Determination of amount at risk. ( a ) *Initial amount.* The amount a taxpayer is at risk on the effective date with respect to an activity to which section 465 applies shall be determined in accordance with this section. The initial amount the taxpayer is at risk in the activity shall be the taxpayer's initial basis in the activity as modified by disregarding amounts described in section 465(b) (3) or (4) (relating generally to amounts protected against loss or borrowed from related persons).
( b ) *Succeeding adjustments.* For each taxable year ending before the effective date, the initial amount at risk shall be increased and decreased by the items which increased and decreased the taxpayer's basis in the activity in that year as modified by disregarding the amounts described in section 465(b) (3) or (4).
( c ) *Application of losses and withdrawals.* ( 1 ) Losses described in section 465(d) which are incurred in taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 1976 and deducted in such taxable years, will be treated as reducing first that portion of the taxpayer's basis which is attributable to amounts not at risk. On the other hand, withdrawals made in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976, will be treated as reducing the amount which the taxpayer is at risk.
( 2 ) Therefore, if in a taxable year beginning prior to January 1, 1976 there is a loss described in section 465(d), it shall reduce the amount at risk only to the extent it exceeds the amount of the taxpayer's basis which is not at risk. For the purposes of this paragraph the taxpayer's basis which is not at risk is that portion of the taxpayer's basis in the activity (as of the close of the taxable year and prior to reduction for the loss) which is attributable to amounts described in section 465(b) (3) or (4).
( d ) *Amount at risk shall not be less than zero.* If, after determining the amount described in paragraph (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the amount at risk (but for this paragraph) would be less than zero, the amount at risk on the effective date shall be zero.
[T.D. 7504, 42 FR 42197, Aug. 22, 1977]
#### Timothy L. WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K. JOBE; Connor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-16852.

D.C. No. CV-98-01644-CRB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 2, 2001.

*321Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Timothy L. Watts (“Watts”), a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison employees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Watts claimed that the defendants violated the Eighth Amendment by showing deliberate indifference toward his serious medical needs on three occasions. Watts claimed that defendants violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for grievances he had filed against them. We review de novo the district court’s award of summary judgment. *See Robi v. Reed,*173 F.3d 736, 739 (9th Cir.1999), *cert. denied,*528 U.S. 952, 120 S.Ct. 375, 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Watts claimed that, on three occasions, defendants were deliberately indifferent to his asthma. Because disagreement with diagnoses and allegations of de minimis pain are insufficient as a matter of law to demonstrate deliberate indifference, the district court did not err by granting summary judgment on Watt’s Eighth Amendment claims. *Hudson v. McMillian,*503 U.S. 1, 112 S.Ct. 995, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992); *Sanchez v. Vild,*891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir.1989).

Watts also claimed that defendants retaliated against him for filing grievances by denying him medical care. Watts failed to show that he suffered any injury from defendant Mayo’s treatment, *see Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 449 (9th Cir.2000), and made only conclusory allegations regarding defendant Conner’s actions. *See Taylor v. List,*880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 43695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-28-000]


Acadian Gas Pipeline System; Notice of Technical Conference

August 20, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference 
in the above-captioned proceeding on Thursday, August 27, 2009, at 10 
a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    Acadian Gas Pipeline System (Acadian) has requested a technical 
conference to discuss additional data it is submitting which will 
revise its Petition for Rate Approval filed July 13, 2009. At the 
conference, Commission Staff and interested persons will have the 
opportunity to discuss the additional data being submitted by Acadian. 
Acadian should be prepared to address all of the above-mentioned 
subject matter, and to provide, as necessary, additional support for 
its filing.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b1b3b3b5a3a3b9b2b9bcb9a4a990b6b5a2b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="543537373127273d363d383d202d14323126377a333b22">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    All interested parties and staff are permitted to attend. For 
further information please contact James Hough at (202) 502-8429 or e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b715a565e481573544e5c537b5d5e4958155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcf6ddd1d9cf92f4d3c9dbd4fcdad9cedf92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20649 Filed 8-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.33



 Exhibit 10.33 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of October 18, 2009, to that Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2009 (the “Agreement”) by and between DAVID LECKEY (the “Executive”) and AMERICAN
MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the “Company”). 
 Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 1a of the Agreement, as amended, is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:

 Employment Term. The company shall employ Executive until March 31, 2011 (the “Employment Term”) on the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement shall be considered effective as of March 22, 2009 (the “Effective Time”). 
 All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	[illegible]
	
	/s/ David Leckey
Exhibit 99.10



CONSENT



The undersigned hereby consents to the use of my name and the scientific
and technical information with respect to:



| | · | The Tonopah Lithium Claims Project derived from sections 1.1, 1.5, 1.6, 1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14, 2, 3, 13, 17, 19, 21, 25 and 26
of the technical report titled “Tonopah Lithium Claims Project NI 43-101 Technical Report – Preliminary Economic Assessment”
with an effective date of January 31, 2023; and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the Falchani Project derived from sections 1.1, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.11, 1.15, 1.16, 2, 3, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 and 26 of
the technical report titled “Falchani Lithium Project NI 43-101 Technical Report – Preliminary Economic Assessment”
with an effective date of February 4, 2020;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





which is included in this annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended
February 28, 2023 (the “Form 40-F”) and the exhibits filed with the Form 40-F being filed by American Lithium Corp. with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.





|                   | 
|------------------ | 
|                   | 
|                   | 
|                   | 
|Date: May 30, 2023 |
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10577 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO JAVIER GARCIA-DAVILA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:00-CR-27-1-C

October 8, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Javier Garcia-Davila, federal prisoner # 34312-077,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

motion for reduction of his sentence for illegal reentry into the

United States after deportation. He argues that Amendment 632 to

the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines should be applied retroactively to

reduce his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2.1 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10 cmt. n. 1 (2001)

(“Eligibility for consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is triggered only by an amendment listed in subsection (c) that lowers
the applicable guideline range.”); United States v. Drath

, 89 F.3d 216, 218 (5th Cir. 1996).

2 For an amendment to the Sen tencing Guidelines to be

retroactive pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), it must be listed in U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.10(c). 1 Assuming a rguendo that Amendment 632 subsequently

lowered Appellant’s sentencing range, it is not listed in U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.10(c) and therefore is nonretroactive.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,469,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    111,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,842,228
<PP&E>                                         783,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                 412,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,842,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,223,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    60,240,288
<OTHER-SE>                                 (55,621,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,619,158
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,074,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,005,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,005,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,005,142) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Houssein Ismael Houssein

# 				Houssein Ismael Houssein			

				Locally Employed Staff			

Deceased				August 26, 2020			

Houssein Ismael Houssein, a Surveillance Detection Specialist with the U.S. Embassy Djibouti, was killed in the course of his duties in a single vehicle motorbike accident that occurred near the embassy on August 26, 2020.

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialDjibouti

Back to Top
§ 553.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 553.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 553.407 .
*See also* § 553.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
§ 548.506 Investment and reinvestment of certain funds. Subject to the requirements of § 548.203, U.S. financial institutions are authorized to invest and reinvest assets blocked pursuant to § 548.201, subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The assets representing such investments and reinvestments are credited to a blocked account or subaccount that is held in the same name at the same U.S. financial institution, or within the possession or control of a U.S. person, but funds shall not be transferred outside the United States for this purpose;
( b ) The proceeds of such investments and reinvestments shall not be credited to a blocked account or subaccount under any name or designation that differs from the name or designation of the specific blocked account or subaccount in which such funds or securities were held; and
( c ) No immediate financial or economic benefit accrues (e.g., through pledging or other use) to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201.
HomeBilateral Free Trade Agreements

# 									Bilateral Free Trade Agreements							

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

February 21, 2019

        - Korea 
        - Australia 
        - Singapore 

Tags

AustraliaSingaporeTrade and Investment

Back to Top
§ 578.403 Termination and acquisition of an interest in blocked property. ( a ) Whenever a transaction licensed or authorized by or pursuant to this part results in the transfer of property (including any property interest) away from a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201, such property shall no longer be deemed to be property blocked pursuant to § 578.201, unless there exists in the property another interest that is blocked pursuant to § 578.201, the transfer of which has not been effected pursuant to license or other authorization.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically provided in a license or authorization issued pursuant to this part, if property (including any property interest) is transferred or attempted to be transferred to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 578.201, such property shall be deemed to be property in which such person has an interest and therefore blocked.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2017-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, February 28, 2017, to and including December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, February 28, 2017, to and including December 31, 2017.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2018.

 

----

 

March 27, 2018

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President          |

 

----