1 

### ATTACHMENT **6**

**Red Line and Strike Out Versions of TSD Excerpt**  **s** GHG Mitigation Measures TSD
1) Pages 3

- 6, 3

- 8, 4

- 4, 4

- 19

– Revised website address for all references to IPM modeling data to: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/powersectormodeling.html

. 2) Revised language and footnote in Chapter 2 on heat rate improvement (HRI) as follows: a) Sec 2. 5 .2.2

– Deleted “ ambient air (primary air) is mixed with fuel prior to combustion and a fraction of” from “ Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat rate in three way s: (1) ambient air (primary air) is mixed with fue l prior to combustion and a fraction of energy released during combustion heats the incoming air, ...,” to read “Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat rate in three way s: (1) energy released during combustion heats the incoming air,....”
Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat rate in three way s: (1) ambient air (primary air) is mixed with fuel prior to combustion and a fraction of energy released during combustion heats the incoming air , (2) in many regions of the country

temperatur e affects electricit y demand and, as a result, some

.... b) Page 2

- 57

– Corrected final footnote: “See supra 93 95 ”.

New Source Complements to Mass Goals Technical Support Document for CPP Final Rule
1) Page 5

– Corrected errors in Table 5, as shown:
The generation totals associated with appl yi ng these capacity factors to under construction facilities are shown in Table 5:

**Table 5. Incremental Generation Assumed to Meet Future Demand from Under Construction Facilities by Interconnection**  **(GWh) Facility**  **Type Eastern**  **Interconnection Western** 

**Interconnection Texas** 

**Interconnection**
NGCC 51,231 12,702 2,636 11,991 2,489 Coal 3,443 0 0 Nuclear 31,926 0 0

2) 

### Made a correction to the accompan yi ng data file by revising the formula for Total by Period, New Source Complements (Tons), affecting non

- Alabama state cumulative totals , as shown:

**State**

**- Level New Source Complement (Tons)** 2



### Emission Intensity of New Source Complement Generation **(lbs/MWh CO2):** 1030

**Total by Period** 

**Total by Period**

**State 2022** 

**- 2024**  **2025**

**- 2027**  **2028**

**- 2029**  **Interim (2022**

**- 2029)**  **Final (2030**

**-**

**2031)**

Alabama 1,054,440 3,557,178 2,240,578 6,852,192 1,511,400

Arizona 2,039,505 5,094,249 4,266,230 11,399,984 4,418,892

Arkansas 506,358 1,708,206 1,075,956 3,290,520 725,794

California 4,074,045 10,176,105 8,522,080 22,772,232 8,827,032

Colorado 1,774,611 4,432,599 3,712,122 9,919,328 3,844,956

Connecticut 166,701 562,362 354,218 1,083,280 238,940

Delaware 97,062 327,435 206,242 630,736 139,122

Florida 2,158,401 7,281,423 4,586,384 14,026 ,208 3,093,782

Georgia 833,784 2,812,788 1,771,704 5,418,272 1,195,118

Idaho 134,916 336,993 282,218 754,128 292,316

Il linois 1,007,442 3,398,634 2,140,714 6,546,792 1,444,036

Indiana 1,156,395 3,901,128 2,457,222 7,514,744 1,657,538

Io wa3 368,007 1,241,484 781,980 2,391,472 527,490

Kansas 320,919 1,082,625 681,918 2,085,464 459,994

Kentucky 926,322 3,124,971 1,968,340 6,019,632 1,327,760

Louisiana 596,217 2,011,350 1,266,900 3,874,464 854,598

Maine 50,268 169,575 106,812 326,656 72,052

Maryland 210,426 709,878 447,134 1,367,440 301,618

Massachuset ts 277,146 934,959 588,908 1,801,016 397,252

Michigan 767,757 2,590,047 1,631,406 4,989,208 1,100,478

Minnesota 352,743 1,189,989 749,544 2,292,280 505,6 12

Mississippi 505,281 1,704,573 1,073,668 3,283,520 724,252

Missouri 823,137 2,776,872 1,749,082 5,349,096 1,179,858

Montana 603,513 1,507,449 1,262,428 3,373,392 1,307,602

Nebraska 266,094 897,675 565,424 1,729,192 381,412

Nevada 1,102,647 2,754,174 2,306,512 6,163,336 2,389,046

New Hampshire 87,921 296,604 186,824 571,352 126,024

New Jersey 385,971 1,302,084 820,150 2,508,208 553,238

New Mexico4 754,458 1,884,477 1,578,174 4,217,112 1,634,646

New York 642,897 2,168,826 1,366,090 4,177,816 921,506

North Carolina 852,012 2,874,282 1,810,438 5, 536,728 1,221,246

North Dakota 302,010 1,018,842 641,742 1,962,592 432,892

Ohio 1,169,511 3,945,375 2,485,092 7,599,976 1,676,340

Oklahoma 715,314 2,413,128 1,519,968 4,648,408 1,025,308

Oregon 649,296 1,621,806 1,358,198 3,629,304 1,406,798

Pennsylvani

a 1,547,865 5,221,764 3,289,058 10,058,688 2,218,660

Rhode Island 86,220 290,859 183,206 560,280 123,582

South Carolina 424,578 1,432,320 902,182 2,759,080 608,574

South Dakota 57,261 193,170 121,672 372,104 82,076

Tennessee 441,756 1,490,268 938,682 2,870,704 633,196

Texas 6,178,251 19,964,331 16,487,484 42,630,064 17,032,816

Utah 1,405,395 3,510,381 2,939,802 7,855,576 3,045,000

Virginia 554,028 1,869,027 1,177,254 3,600,312 794,126

Washington 761,073 1,901,001 1,592,012 4,254,088 1,648,98 0

West Virginia5 742,260 2,504,034 1,577,228 4,823,520 1,063,932

Wisconsin 449,145 1,515,201 954,386 2,918,728 643,790

Wyoming 1,696,803 4,238,256 3,549,370 9,484,432 3,676,380

Lands of the Navajo Nation 1,158,672 2,894,115 2,423,706 6,476,496 2,510,434

Lands of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation 120,855 301,866 252,800 675,520 261,846

Lands of the Fort Mojave Tribe 53,187 132,852 111,258 297,296 115,238



### CO 2 

### Emissions Performance and Goal Computation TSD
1) Corrected two column headings in the h ydro adjustment spread sheet provided in support of this TSD by

re vis ing to “Criteria 2

– greater than 10 5 %” and “Criteria 3

– greater than 10 5 %” as shown: Hydro Adjustment to Baseline (incorporated in Appendix 3)

Criteria 1

- greater than 10% Criteria 2

- greater than 10 5 % Criteria 3

- Greater than 10 5 %

STATE hydro as

% of total generation 2012 hydro

(TWh) Hy dro1990

- 2012

average (TWh) %

difference betw een 2012 and average 2012 affected fossil

TWh Baseline Fossil

Adjustment (100% = no change)

WA 77% 89 79 113% 9 207.03%

ID 73% 11 10 108% 1 165.23%

OR 65% 39 37 107% 14 118.05%

SD 50% 6 5 124% 3 141.50%

MT 41% 11 10 110% 14 106.82%

ME 33% 3 3 124% 4 115.38%