INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment. 

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 1 00 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

(317) 232-8603 

Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov 

Ms. Susan Hedman 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, IL 60604-3950 

Dear Ms. Hedman: 

May 10, 2013 

Re: Request to Parallel Process the Draft 

MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB 

Replacement Update to the Maintenance 

Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard 

for Vigo County, Indiana 

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submits the 

enclosed MOBILE6.2 to Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budget (MVEB) replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-

hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana. The United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) approved the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance 

Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, for Vigo 

County, Indiana, submitted by IDEM on July, 5, 2005, with an effective date of February 

6, 2006. IDEM requests that U.S. EPA parallel process this draft MVEB replacement 

submittal for approval into Indiana's State Implementation Plan. 

IDEM is providing an opportunity for a public hearing on the MVEB replacement 

update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, 

Indiana, if a public hearing request is received by June 12, 2013. A hearing has been 

scheduled for June 19, 2013. If a request for a public hearing is not received by June 12, 

2013, the hearing will be cancelled. IDEM is providing a 35 day comment period on this 

update, with the public comment period ending on June 21 , 2013. The final submittal of 

the MVEB update for the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo 

County, Indiana will document the public review process, including a detailed summary of 

and response to substantive comments. 

Recycled Paper (i) An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle () 
Ms. Hedman 

Page 2 

This MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB replacement update incorporates onroad 

emission estimates and revised MVEBs using U.S. EPA's recently adopted MOVES 

model. The onroad emission estimates were calculated using the MOVES-based 

emission factors and data extracted from the Vigo County, Indiana, area's travel-demand 

model. 

MVEBs are being revised in anticipation of the mandatory use of the MOVES 

model in future transportation conformity determinations. Preliminary use of the new 

model indicates that emission estimates can be considerably different than similar 

calculations using MOBILE6.2, which was used to create the MVEBs in the original 1997 

8-hour ozone maintenance plan. 

Onroad safety margins, established through the interagency consultation process, 

are included for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These 

on road safety margins are allocated to on road emission estimates in order to account for 

the wide array of assumptions that are factored into the calculation process. With the 

addition of onroad safety margins applied to mobile sources, the Vigo County, Indiana, 

ozone maintenance area will continue to remain well below the overall safety margins for 

all sources. MVEBs are also constrained to ensure that total NOx and VOC emissions 

(i.e., all source categories) do not exceed attainment year emissions to ensure continued 

maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. 

This submittal consists of one (1) hard copy of the required documentation. An 

electronic version of the submittal in PDF format that is identical to the hard copy has 

been sent to Pamela Blakley, Chief of U.S. EPA Region 5's Control Strategies Section. 

IDEM respectfully requests that U.S. EPA proceed with preliminary review of the 

MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB replacement update and revised transportation conformity 

budgets and approval into Indiana's State Implementation Plan for the Vigo County, 

Indiana, maintenance area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. If you have any 

questions or need additional information, please contact Scott Deloney, Chief, Air 

Programs Branch, at (317) 233-5694. 

Sincerely, 

( J \ e.JJJ..._ £.,.~8->-o! 

Keith Baugues 

Assistant Commissioner 

Office of Air Quality 

KB/sad/sms 

Enclosures: 

Recycfed Paper (i) 

MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB Replacement Update to the Request for 

Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment Area for Vigo County, Indiana and Appendices. 

Electronic MOVES-based modeling input and output data files. 

An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle C, 
Ms. Hedman 

Page 3 

cc: Doug Aburano, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) 

Steve Rosenthal, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) 

Ed Doty, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) 

Recycled Paper ® 

Pam Blakley, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) 

Anthony Maietta, U.S. EPA Region 5 (no enclosures) 

Ron Hinsenkamp, WCIEDD (w/ enclosures) 

Keith Baugues, IDEM-OAQ (no enclosures) 

Scott Deloney, IDEM (no enclosures) 

Shawn Seals, IDEM (w/ enclosures) 

An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle (j 
This page intentionally left blank. 
LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budget Replacement Update to the Maintenance Plan for 

the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Vigo County, Indiana 

Notice is hereby given under 40 CFR 51.102 that the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management (IDEM) is accepting written comment and providing an 

·opportunity for public hearing regarding the Motor Vehicle Emission Budget (MVEB) 

replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo 

County, Indiana. Onroad emissions for the original submittal were calculated using the 

MOBILE6.2 mobile model and are now being replaced with the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) recently adopted Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Simulator (MOVES) mobile model. All interested persons are invited and will 

be given reasonable opportunity to express their views concerning the submittal ofthe 

proposed MVEB replacement update to the Vigo County, Indiana, maintenance area for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. 

The purpose ofthis notice is to solicit public comment on Indiana's proposed 

MVEB replacement update. Vigo County, Indiana, was designated as nonattainment for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and is subject to the requirements of Section 172 of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA). One of the compliance requirements mandated by Section 

175A(b) ofthe CAA, is the development of a plan demonstrating that maintenance areas 

will continue to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for the next ten years, which 

includes MVEBs for onroad sources, beyond the cunent maintenance period. This 

submittal of the proposed MVEB replacement update to the Request for Redesignation 

and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment 

Area for Vigo County, Indiana, maintenance area that was originally submitted on July 5, 

2005, is being drafted and submitted consistent with U.S. EPA guidance. Upon 

completion of this public notice process, the MOBILE6.2-based to MOVES-based 

MVEB replacement update will be submitted to U.S. EPA for approval into the State 

Implementation Plan. 

Copies of the draft documents will be available on or before May 17, 2013, to any 

person upon request and at the following locations: 

• Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, 

Indiana Government Center Nmth, 100 Nmth Senate Avenue, Room N1003, 

Indianapolis, Indiana. 

• Vigo County Public Library, One Library Square (7111 and Poplar), Tene Haute, 

Indiana. 

The draft documents will also be available on the following web page: 

http://www.in.gov/idem/airquality/2392.htm 

1 
An electronic version of all MOVES mobile model input and output files will be 

available at the public hearing, if held, or upon request. 

Any person may submit written comments on the MVEB replacement update to 

the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area on or before June 21, 

2013. Written comments should be directed to Mr. Shawn Seals, Mail Code 61-50, 

Office of Air Quality, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 100 North 

Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204; or fax (317) 233-5967; or email at 

SSeals@idem.in.gov. Interested parties may also present oral or written comments at the 

public hearing, if held. Oral statements will be heard, but for the accuracy of the record, 

statements should be submitted in writing. Written statements may be submitted to the 

attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing. 

A public hearing on the MVEB replacement update to the maintenance plan for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard for Vigo County, Indiana will be held if a public hearing 

request is received by June 12, 2013. A hearing has been scheduled for June 19, 2013. 

The meeting will convene at 6:00p.m. (local time) at the Vigo County Public Library, 

One Library Square (i11 and Poplar), Terre Haute, Indiana, 47807. If a request for a 

public hearing is not received by June 12, 2013, the hearing will be cancelled. Interested 

patiies can check the online IDEM calendar at http://www.in.gov/idem/5474.htm or 

contact Mr. Shawn Seals at (317) 233-0425, after June 12, 2013, to see if the hearing has 

been cancelled or will convene. 

A transcript of the hearing and all written submissions provided at the public 

hearing shall be open to public inspection at IDEM and copies may be made available to 

any person upon payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard or represented at the 

hearing or requesting notice shall be given written notice of actions resulting from the 

hearing. 

For additional information contact Mr. Shawn Seals, at the Indiana Department of 

Enviromnental Management, Office of Air Quality, Room N 1001 , Indiana Govermnent 

Center North, 100 Nmih Senate A venue, Indianapolis, IN 46204 or call (317) 233-0425 

or (800) 451-6027 ext. 3-0425 (in Indiana). 

**************************************************~********************* 

Individuals requiring reasonable accommodations for participation in this hearing, if 

held, should contact the IDEM Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at: 

Attn: ADA Coordinator 

Indiana Department of Enviromnental Management- Mail Code 50-10 

100 North Senate A venue 

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 

Or call (31 7) 233-1785 (voice) or (31 7) 232-6565 (FDD). Please provide a minimum of 

72 hours notification. 

2 
DRAFT 

Onroad Emissions MOBILE6.2 to 

MOVES Replacement Submittal 

Maintenance 'A;~a11~d~r. the 1997 

8 L.··.•.·•······.······ > ..o\·c ............... t··s·) ... ....... d. d :mounj zone tan ar 

May 2013 
This page intentionally left blank 
Introduction 

On July 5, 2005, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a 

Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic 

Nonallainmenl Area, for Vigo County, Indiana. The United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (U.S. EPA) subsequently approved the Indiana redesignation ofVigo County, Indiana, to 

attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard on January 5, 2006 with an effective date of 

February 6, 2006 (71 FR 541). Onroad emissions for the July 5, 2005, submittal were calculated 

using MOBILE6.2. U.S. EPA has encouraged mobile source stakeholders to transition to the new 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model as expeditiQ.lJ~ly as possible. Therefore, 

IDEM is providing this MOBILE6.2 to MOVES replacement y.p#~Wto the previously submitted 

1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Vigo County, In4@1if, ozone maintenance area that 

::;:~~:::::::-based oruoad emissions. /~ 1 m ·•·· 

Table 4.1 was included without title in Appendi~~;~~;the original Rede~;·~~~~\\:1)) Petition and 

Maintenance Plan. Table 4.1 -A (to be considered a}ep)aceJ11t:Ji}tgfthe table i@lJ.Jded in 

Appendix B) has been revised to · updated ~fu:~<~4~ffil~~ion estimatesf~f:nitrogen oxides 

(NOx) and volatile organic ·the ye!H'$~Q02, 2010, and 2015; it results in a 

different overall safety margin for the 

Comparison of""~:~,.,,, •. ,., .• Jn 

County 1997 11-llftltli~h:wn 

1 
Table 4.1-A 

Comparison of 2002,2010, and 2015 Emission Estimates in Tons Per Summer Day, Vigo 

County 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area (MOVES-based Onroad Emissions) 

Sector 2002 NOx 2010 NOx 2015 NOx 

Area 1.30 1.40 1.43 

Nonroad 2.53 2.01 1.53 

Onroad 14.87 7.49 4.41 

Point 33.63 12.91 12.93 

Total 52.33 23.81 20.3 

Sector 2002 voc 2010 voc 2015 voc 

Area 8.56 9.89 10.83 

Nonroad 2.80 1.93 1.67 

Onroad 5.79 3.06 1.88 

Point 6.52 7.24 8.42 

Total 23.67 22.12 22.8 

'•:·.·.··;::: .. ··:-·-:··-·.··. 

Onroad emission estimates in Table 4.1 -A we ~~ ulated1t~f'rtg U.S. ·:MOVES modelproduced emission factors and data ,exttacted from thKhl 5.~m ~~ ~vel-demand d'~i. The 

MOVES model implements a signifiq,{ni\)7-different ap P to emissions estimation than the 

previous model (MOBILE6.2). Prelirhh~aiy~~e 9±: the MOV~ .. model indicates that emission 

estimates can be considerably different th ~ irnii r \~ulatioM ~jng MOBILE6.2, which was '= . •, •'•' ... . ·.·.·.·,·.·,·, used to create the origi11~ MY.~ s for theWigo County,Jndiana;:qmn 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area . . ~i)H~f @p~nary of'th ,.MQY. .: iri: tb;qdol y used in this area can be 

found in Appendix N.::mm.. additio'B'tM,:OVES p'l t rid output· files are being provided 

electronically with thi (S~U1J!Jlittal. :Gf owth and \)oti\rol strategy assumptions for non-mobile 

sources (i.e. area~ nonroad ~\4P.9fut);Jr.9.W the ig~IJ;al submittal for the years 2002, 2010, and . . . . . ........................ , , .. . 2015 wei de loped fore'· ]j:t?:: ~o'llomi<i:~ !: J.leng ofthe last several years. Because ofthis, 

the fa ~i~~jncludea in ~~ riglH~ J..ibmittaf ~Y:: J}ect more growth than will actually occur in . .. ., ...... . ........ the future;· As a result, the gr9wtli':an9 .. _control stl.:ategy assumptions for the non-mobile sources 

for the yeruk 2002, 2010, am{ 2Q15 fi W.~1e to be valid and do not affect the overall conclusions 

f '•.. . '· .... ·.;.;.;.;.; .. o the plan. ··:::;:: ., .. '\ ··:::::::::::· 

"···· ~::.: . '\~\ ·.:.-

Onroad safety mai.·g~ have be~fl ,included for onroad emission estimates to accommodate the 

wide array of assumpHop.s that factored into the calculation process. Since assumptions 

change over time, it is n: c~sshl·y . .fo have an onroad safety margin that will accommodate the 

impact of refined assumptiop.s:·}n the process. The plan continues to meet all applicable Clean 

Air Act (CAA) requirements as the revised emission inventories clearly illustrate that total NOx 

and VOC emissions in the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area will 

continue to decline leading to local reductions between 2002 (base year) and 201 0 (maintenance 

plan interim budget year), as well as 2002 (base year) and 2015 (maintenance plan horizon 

budget year). 

2 
Transpot·tation Conformity Budgets 

Table 5.1 was included on Page 18 of the original Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan 

for the Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area. Table 5.1 -A (to be 

considered a replacement of Table 5.1) has been revised to incorporate U.S. EPA's MOVES 

model-produced emission factors and data extracted from the region's travel-demand model. 

Table 5.1 

Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources for the 

Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-Hour Ozone Non~ttainment Area 

(MOBILE6.2-based Onroad Emi!!s.i~ns) ..... ~:1'; ·::·~.>. 

2002 2015 Margin of 

Safety 

VMT (miles/day) 3,506,570 

VOC (tons/day) 

NOx (tons/day) 

·(~;if;~: .. ~~) a ~Ie 5.1 :: ~\~[~i!!lllil;;::::::-· ·: .. ,. J 

Emission Estimatiov~:.foi Qm ~ad MobiJt §.ources for the 

Vigo County, Indiana, ~>7 8~Hoiir,: 9~one N~~~ttainment Area 

.. :::::::::::::::·(00, o VES-ti a~ed On~6 ·:.Emissirilis):::: .. 

. ;:::(l{j{~:::::::~::{j~~>·, \~:--' ·~ .·.· .~::· .}·:··:;::) :\::::... '::::;::' 

2015 

VOC (tons/d~y)}:: • .. •.•. 5.79 3.06 1.88 

,.,, NQl (tqt1s/.day) ··::: .• . . . • .. ·. ~ ' 

14.87 7.49 4.41 

.·> ·,•.•;•, • ·.;.:·:·:·:·. "-~·=···:·:·:.>:·.•. \:: ...... 

10.07% 

9.88% 

.. :·:··.: ··::~~;.· ··~ < .. ·::·~, ··::::::::::::.. ··~·;~::::::::::::~: . Table .' ~~~ also inclucteB·oh.Pagcit:t'Q::.Pfthe origiMl Redesignation Petition and Maintenance 

Plan for the V:igo County, Indi.alia, 19~ri%l;l.our ozone maintenance area. Table 5.2 - A (to be •,·. ,. . •,•,•,•.•.·, 

considered a t:eP..lasement ofTabJe'~5.2) as::~~en revised to incorporate MVEBs calculated using 

U.S. EPA's MOV~S model-prod\l<J d emission factors and data extracted from the region's traveldemand model as & tailed in Tabli:t 5:.1 - A. 

'\:::: ./·.·:~:i 

··:::(l~t=··:::~::·:::.;:> Table 5.2 

-:.; .. :/Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets 

(MOBILE6.2-based Onroad Emissions) 

2015 tons/day 

voc ~ 

NOx ~ 

3 
Table 5.2- A 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the 

Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area 

(MOVES-based Onroad Emissions) 

2015 

VOC (tons/summer day) 2.17 

NOx (tons/summer day) 5.07 

.·{();;: 

Through the interagency consultation process, it was determ.in¢Wtliat a maintenance plan horizon 

year budget of2015, would be appropriate. The interage~9 ~qp~~ltation group approved onroad 

margins of safety of fifteen percent (15%) for both VOC .aiid No · ·onroad emission estimates for 

the year 2015. A summary of this interagency con ultatio~ discus ~n can be found in Appendix 

B. These revised emission inventories clearly il!u·strate that onroad VOG. .. a.nd NOx emissions in the 

Vigo County, Indiana, 1997 8-h.our ozone maintenance area will contimi'tdo decline leading to 

local reductions between 2002 (base year) and 2015 (maintenaqce plan hodzo.n budget year). 

Furthermore, when compared to the i~i:? . . .. .... lt. 

safety margin .. as :Y .f~fi ~d in the C~~:·: Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 93.101, {~Y:~~:J.~~1t the oru:C~~ safety margin allocation is 

reasonable and appropriate. More spedfi$~Ji ~:V.:e n with the··a}'Iocation of an omoad safety margin 

to mobile sources, emissions will continugi.o remlin w~u belovv':the overall safety margin for all 

sources as detailed in Table 4.1 ;. A. MVEBs:·kre cons'tiifned. to ensure that the total emissions 

(i.e., all source categotje;) do not exceed the 29o~ ~iW ~ih(Y,~ar. emi.ssions of either VOC or 

NOx, thereby ensuring.continued maintenance 6Hhel997 8-h'J~lozone standard. "·· 0:::: .· ~. ··:····· 

C l . ..;::.:··:·. ::;::::::::. one uswn · :·· :···.. ··=·=·=<· 

·< ... ··~r:·:·:nr:r::· :=>· ~~ . .. ... \::?:=: 

This MQBILE6.2 to MOY~~ repl<:~ce nt updat~ to the· previously submitted Request for 

RedesigrlCiti'ory and Maint~n~~qe P{anfor.,Ozone Attctinment in the 8-Hour Ozone Basic 

Nonattainii1e.ijt 1:rea, for Vig'b :C?}~ nty:' tzdiana incorporates omoad emission estimates and a 

revised MVEB ~~~ng U.S. EPAt~ i)~cently a,~opted MOVES model. MVEBs have been revised in 

anticipation ofth~::mm1datory use=:b;f:.the MOVES model in future transportation conformity 

detenninations. Th'6::~J\r,~;> ad emisMbp estimates were calculated using the MOVES-based emission 

factors and data extracte fi.·om tl{~·; ai·ea's travel-demand model. Onroad safety margins for VOCs 

and NOx, established thrdhgh:,th~jBte agency consultation process, are included in order to account 

for the wide array of assumph9n~· that are factored into the calculation process. MVEBs are also 

constrained to ensure that total VOC and NOx emissions (i.e., all source categories) do not exceed 

attainment year (2002) emissions to ensure continued maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

standard. With the addition of MOVES-based onroad safety margins applied to mobile sources, 

the Vigo County, Indiana, ozone maintenance area will continue to remain well below the overall 

safety margins for all sources into the future. As such, the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan 

for Vigo County, Indiana, continues to meet all applicable CAA requirements. 

4 
Appendix A 

Vigo County, Indiana, Maintenance 

Area MOVES Methodology 
This page left intentionally blank 
Terre Haute 

MOVES2010a Input Data and 

Parameters 

INDOT Planning Contract 

Final Report 

October 4, 2012 

CDMth Sm1 
Table of Contents 

Overview .............................................................................................................................. 1 

Vehicle Age Distribution ....................................................................................................... 1 

Vehicle Population ................................................................................................................ 2 

Meteorological Data .............................................................................................................. 4 

Default VMT Distributions ..................................................................................................... 4 

Default Hourly Distributions .................................................................................................. 5 

Default Daily and Monthly Distributions ................................................................................ 6 

Ramp Fractions .................................................................................................................... 6 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 1: MOVES2010a Source Type Codes ............................................................................. 1 

Table 2: MOVES2010a Road Type Codes ................................................................................ 1 

Table 3: Distribution of MOBILE 6.2 Light Duty Trucks into MOVES Source Types ................... 3 

Table 4: Inventory of Permanent Count Stations ....................................................................... 5 

LIST OF APPENDICES 

Appendix A- MOVES2010a Input Settings and Assumptions 

Appendix B- Vehicle Age Distributions for Vigo County 

Appendix C- Vehicle Populations for Vigo County 

Appendix D- Meteorological Data for Vigo County 

Appendix E- Default Statewide Factors 

Appendix F- Statewide Default Hourly Distribution Factors 

Appendix G- Statewide Default Daily Distribution Factors 

Appendix H- Statewide Default Monthly Distribution Factors 

Appendix I - Ramp Fractions 
Overview: 

This report is being written to document the input parameters for a set of MOVES201 Oa 

runs for the Terre Haute 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Area. This report contains a 

discussion on the intended input settings used in MOVES201 Oa and the development of 

the input datasets. These MOVES201 Oa runs are intended to develop a default set of 

emission rates that can be used for conformity determination and is part of a statewide 

effort being conducted by the Indiana Department of Transportation (IN DOT). 

Throughout this report references are made to MOVES 201 Oa codes for two types of 

data. The values for the source type codes are shown in Table 1. The values for the 

road type codes are shown in Table 2. MOVES2010a input settings and assumptions for 

this effort are shown in Appendix A. 

Table 1: MOVES2010a Source Type Codes 

sourcetypeid Description 

11 Motorcycles 

21 Passenger Car 

31 Passenger Truck 

32 Light Commercial Truck 

41 Intercity Bus 

42 Transit Bus 

43 School Bus 

51 Refuse Truck 

52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 

53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 

54 Motor Home 

61 Combination Short-haul Truck 

62 Combination Long-haul Truck 

Table 2: MOVES2010a Road Type Codes 

roadtypeid 

Vehicle Age Distribution: 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Description 

Off Network 

Rural Restricted Access 

Rural Unrestricted Access 

Urban Restricted Access 

Urban Unrestricted Access 

The vehicle age distributions for MOVES source types 21, 31, and 32 (cars, passenger 

trucks, and light commercial vehicles respectively) were developed through an analysis 

of Indiana's 2009 vehicle registration data. The analysis was performed by Eastern 

Research Group (ERG) under contract to the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium 

(LADCO). ERG was provided with vehicle identification numbers (VIN) for vehicles in 

Indiana. 
There were approximately 6.37 million VINs in the statewide data set. Out of these, 

approximately 1.3 million returned errors. Of these, approximately 200,000 errors were 

deemed non-critical. This means that the model year and vehicle type assigned to the 

records were most likely correct despite there being an error in the VIN decoding. These 

records were included in ERG's analysis. The remaining errors were considered critical 

enough to call into question the accuracy of the model year and vehicle types. These 

critical errors were excluded from ERG's analysis. 

In all, approximately 5.2 million VINs from around the state were used in the analysis. 

Each VIN was associated to a specific county. ERG then developed age distributions for 

each county in the state along with seven combination areas comprised of two or more 

counties each. Additional information on the methodology used to develop the vehicle 

age distributions can be found in a May 28, 2010 report written by ERG for LADCO titled 

MOBILE6 and MOVES Registration Distribution Calculations for Indiana Registration 

Data. Each set of age distributions was provided in both MOBILE6 and MOVES formats. 

The MOVES formatted data will be used for these MOVES201 Oa runs. 

Due to limitations in ERG's VIN decoder, it was not possible to develop vehicle age 

distributions for any source types other than 21, 31, and 32 from the vehicle registration 

data. For all other source types, MOVES201 Oa default vehicle age distributions specific 

to each source types were used. This includes motorcycles and all heavy vehicles. 

Vehicle age distributions for all source types were kept constant for all future years. The 

vehicle age distributions for Vi go County are shown in Appendix B of this report. 

Vehicle Population: 

The vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were developed directly from 

the vehicle registration data. All valid records that were identified from the vehicle 

registration data set were used to determine the number of vehicles for each of these 

three source types. The VIN decoded data provided to INDOT contained vehicle types 

according to MOBILE6.2 vehicle categories. There is a direct correlation between 

MOVES source type 21 (cars) and the MOBILE6.2 vehicle type LDV. All valid LDV 

records (those records not excluded from the vehicle age distribution analysis due to 

errors as was described in the section on Vehicle Age Distribution in this report) were 

counted in the vehicle population. 

There is not a direct correlation between MOVES source types 31 (passenger trucks) 

and 32 (light commercial vehicles) and the MOBILE6.2 light truck vehicle types (LDT1, 

LDT2, LDT3, and LDT4). All valid records from the vehicle registration data set for 

MOBILE6.2 light duty trucks were counted in the vehicle populations. The light duty 

trucks were distributed between MOVES source types 31 and 32 as per the 

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) guidance documented in Table A.1 of the 

appendix of the Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission lnventorv 

Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity. The guidance 

provides two sets of factors for distributing MOBILE6.2 light trucks between MOVES 

source types 31 and 32. These are based on fuel type and are shown in Table 3. 

2 
Table 3: Distribution of MOBILES .2 L' lgl h D t uty Trucks · m to MOVES Source Types 

Source Types 

Fuel 31 32 

Gas 78% 22% 

Diesel 42% 58% 

As per ERG's assumption documented in MOBILE6 and MOVES Registration 

Distribution Calculations for Indiana Registration Data, all light duty trucks that did not 

have a fuel type identified were counted as diesel trucks. This was to prevent an 

underestimation of diesel trucks and their related emissions. 

Since only valid records from the vehicle registration data were used to calculate vehicle 

populations for source types 21, 31, and 32, it is reasonable to assume that some of the 

erroneous records that were discarded from the analysis actually belonged to these 

source types. The nature of these errors is not that the vehicle does not exist. Rather, it 

is that the vehicle could not be properly identified with any sense of certainty. It was 

therefore necessary to adjust the vehicle populations calculated from vehicle registration 

data to compensate for these discarded records. Based on an analysis of the error rate 

reported by ERG, vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were increased by 

5.8 percent. 

Vehicle populations were not able to be developed directly from the vehicle registration 

data for some source types. This was due to the limitations in the VIN decoder used by 

ERG to process the vehicle registration data. Vehicle populations for all other source 

types (motorcycles and heavy vehicles) were derived by applying the Mileage 

Accumulation Rate (MAR) method documented in EPA's Technical Guidance on the Use 

of MOVES201 0 for Emission lnventorv Preparation in State Implementation Plans and 

Transportation Conformity, Section 3.3 Source Type Population. 

The default MARs were extracted from MOVES by running MOVES for a single pollutant 

and a single year for all vehicles, fuels, months, days, and hours. The activity output was 

set to report both distance and population. A ratio of population to vehicle-miles-traveled 

(VMT) was calculated from these outputs. The ratios were calculated for each source 

type. 

The metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Terre Haute - Vigo County provided 

VMT by MOVES road types extracted from their travel demand model's base year. Since 

the default MARs in MOVES vary by year (but not by location), the MOVES run that was 

executed to extract the MARs was run for a year consistent with the travel demand 

model's base year. This resulted in MARs that could be applied directly to the validated 

VMTs reported by the travel demand model. The travel demand model VMTs were 

converted into annual VMT and distributed by vehicle types using statewide default VMT 

distribution factors documented in this report in the section on Default VMT Distributions. 

The MARs were then applied to the annual vehicle type VMTs. The result was an 

estimated vehicle population for each source type for the travel demand model's base 

year. Since the vehicle populations for source types 21, 31, and 32 were developed 

directly from the vehicle registration data, the population estimates derived for those 

source types using the MAR method were discarded and the observed data were used 

instead. 

3 
Future year vehicle populations were developed base on socioeconomic growth rates for 

the maintenance area. The MPO provided base year and horizon year population and 

employment data for the area. Annual growth rates were calculated for population 

growth and employment growth individually. Population growth rates were then used to 

grow the light vehicle populations (source types 11, 21, 31, and 32). Employment growth 

rates were used to grow the heavy vehicle populations (source types 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 

53, 54, 61, and 62). Vehicle populations were calculated for every year from 2008 to 

2040. These vehicle populations for Vigo County are shown in Appendix C. 

Meteorological Data: 

The default set of hourly temperatures and hourly relative humidity was developed using 

EPA's data converters for changing MOBILE6.2 minimum I maximum temperatures and 

absolute humidity to the MOVES equivalent formats. The values for the MOBILE6.2 

inputs were taken from the Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Ozone 

Attainment in the 8-hour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, Appendix C, developed by 

the Indiana Department of Environmental Management in October, 2005. The MOVES 

formatted meteorological data for Vigo County are presented in Appendix D of this 

report. 

Default VMT Distributions: 

As part of this effort, INDOT developed a default set of VMT distribution factors by 

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) vehicle type and by MOVES road 

type. These distribution factors were developed by analyzing four consecutive years of 

continuous traffic count data ending in 2010 for twenty permanent traffic count stations 

throughout Indiana. The stations were selected to provide a spread of locations 

corresponding to each of the four MOVES road types. Furthermore, these stations were 

selected from among sites that were concentrated in nonattainment and maintenance 

areas. In some cases, data from the requested site were either partially or completely 

unavailable. An inventory of the sites used to develop the distributions is shown in Table 

4. 

The vehicle counts reported at each station were provided by vehicle class. These were 

aggregated into the six basic HPMS vehicle types: motorcycle, passenger car, light 

truck, bus, single-unit heavy truck, and combination heavy truck. The distribution of VMT 

by vehicle type was calculated for each road type by taking each vehicle type's 

percentage of total traffic. These default statewide factors are shown in Appendix E. 

4 
Table 4 Inventory of Permanent Count Stations 

SiteiD City County Location Road 

Type Data Quality 

3000 MUNCIE DELAWARE SR 332 RM 0.5 3 Closed since 9/26/2006. No 

data. 

3200 

3300 

4000 

4500 

5600 

6100 

CARMEL HAMILTON 

INDY WEST MARION 

GARY LAKE 

LAPORTE LAPORTE 

SELLERSBURG CLARK 

EVANSVILLE GIBSON 

US 31 RM 125.7 5 

1465 MM 10.0 4 

I 80 /I 94 MM 6.0 4 

SR2 RM65.2 3 

165 MM 8.0 4 

164 MM 27.9 2 

Good 

Closed since 9/1/10 

Only 2010 data passed QC 

Good 

Bad sensors. Not usable. 

Good 

0105 TERRE HAUTE VIGO US 41 RM 104.2 3 Good-closed 

5/13/09 

11/13/08-

0201 

0210 

0303 

0327 

I 0403 

0501 

0502 

0507 

0602 

MIDDLEBURY ELKHART 

FORT WAYNE ALLEN 

MUNCIE DELAWARE 

DALEVILLE DELAWARE 

SOUTH BEND ST. JOSEPH 

INDY SOUTH MARION 

MARTINSVILLE MORGAN 

SEYMOUR JACKSON 

HAZLETON GIBSON 

SR 120 RM 13.9 3 

1-69 0.53 mi N of 4 SR3 

US 35 RM 44.5 5 

169MM31.4 2 

US 20 RM 77.1 4 

SR 37 RM 143.5 5 

SR 67 RM 80.6 3 

165 MM 47.0 2 

SR 56 RM 0.6 3 

Good- closed 8/3/10-12/6/10 

Good 

Good 

Good-built in 12/10/2007 

Good 

Good-closed 5/22/09-6/1/09 

Good 

Good 

Good 

0603 DUBOIS DUBOIS SR 56 RM 53.3 3 

5 

4 

Good- closed 10/16/08-

3/20/09 

0608 EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SR66 RM 23.5 Good 

1315 I 70 MARION I 70 MM 83.5 Closed 5/17/06-3/24/08 

Default Hourly Distributions: 

The same set of twenty permanent traffic count locations discussed in the section on 

Default VMT Distributions was analyzed to develop a set of hourly distribution factors. 

These factors were calculated by road type, by HPMS vehicle type. Hourly factors were 

only calculated for the average weekday. The hourly distribution pattern for each traffic 

count location was reviewed. Any data that appeared to reflect either an error in the data 

or an outlier of behavior were removed to prevent bias in the data. The following data 

were excluded from the analysis: 

• Bus data from count stations 0105 and 0603 were excluded due to abnormal 

midnight peaks in the data; 

• An abnormal relationship between passenger cars and light duty trucks at count 

station 4500 prompted the exclusion of all data from this location due to 

questions of reliability; 

• Peak spreading behavior observed at count station 4000 from traffic related to 

Chicago was considered to be too unique to be included in a default statewide 

data set; and, 

• Combination truck traffic from station 3200 was excluded due to too much 

overnight traffic when compared to other vehicles and other stations. 

5 
Furthermore, traffic patterns reported by those count stations corresponding to road type 

3 (3000, 4500, 0105, 0201, 0502, 0602, and 0603) had a tendency to over represent 

long distance travel. This was most likely the result of statewide permanent count 

stations focusing primarily on higher order facilities. Rural collectors and local streets are 

less likely to reflect long distance travel. The hourly distributions for road type 3 (rural 

unrestricted access) were adjusted to better account for traffic behavior on lower order 

facilities in rural areas. A sample of traffic count data from Morgan County, IN was used 

to introduce more local traffic behavior in the road type 3 hourly distributions. An analysis 

of the Morgan County data showed a pattern rnore consistent with AM and PM peaking 

characteristics reflecting local commuting traffic on collectors and local streets for 

passenger cars and light duty trucks. The Morgan County data for passenger cars and 

light duty trucks on collectors and local streets were weighted and added to the road 

type 3 data set. This analysis assumed that rural collectors and local streets accounted 

for 20 percent of all VMT for road type 3. 

The statewide default hourly distribution factors are presented in Appendix F. 

Default Daily and Monthly Distributions: 

Default daily and monthly distribution factors were calculated from IN DOT's official count 

adjustment factors which are more commonly used to develop AADT from raw traffic 

counts. These factors are based on the set of daily traffic counts collected from all 

permanent count stations throughout the state. The daily distribution factors determine 

what percentage of VMT is occurring on weekdays and what percentage is occurring on 

weekends. The monthly distribution factors determine what percentage of annual VMT is 

occurring in each month of the year. The statewide default daily distribution factors are 

shown in Appendix G. The statewide default monthly distribution factors are shown in 

Appendix H. 

Ramp Fractions: 

The ramp fractions represent the percentage of vehicle-hours-traveled (VHT) for road 

types 2 (rural restricted access) and 4 (urban restricted access) occurring on the ramps 

associated with those road types. These fractions were calculated based on the 

percentage of VHT occurring on ramps reported by the base year travel demand model. 

These ramp fractions are reported in Appendix I. 

6 
Appendix A 

Number of Runs: 

Input Item Ozone 

Years 2002, 2010, 

2015, 2020, 

2025, 2030, 

2035,2040 

Pollutants/ Volatile 

Processes Organic 

Compound 

(VOC}, NOx, 

and supporting 

Meteorology Summer 

#ofMOVES 8 

runs 
General Parameters: 

MOVES Input Item 

Screen Ozone 

Description Description User Choice 

Scale Domain/Scale County 

Calculation Type Emission Rate 

Time Spans Time Hour 

Aggregation 

Level 

Year 2002, 2010, 

2015, 2020, 

2025, 2030, 

2035, 2040 

Months July 

Days Weekday 

Hours Select All 

Geographic Geographic Vigo County 

Bounds Bounds 

Vehicles Vehicles All Gas and 

Diesel 

Combinations 

Road Type Road Type Select All 

Pollutants/ Pollutants/ VOC, NOx, and 

Processes Processes supporting 

General Database Name Vigo Ozone 

Output Units Select "Grams" 

and "Miles" and 

"Million BTU" 

Activity Distance, 

Population 

Output On Road Select "Source 

Emissions Use Type" and 

Detail "Road Type" 
C t D t M • 

County Data Excel Sheet Tab 

Manager Input Name 

Ozone 

Source (Vehicle) source Type Year Local Registration for Source Types 21 , 31, and 

Type Population 32; Estimated population using default MOVES 

mileage accumulation rates and local VMT for all 

other source types. Future year vehicle 

populations based on population growth rates for 

source types 11, 21, 31, and 32. Employment 

growth used for all other source types. 

Vehicle Type H PMSVType Year Statewide default vehicle distributions across 

VMT (by 13 road types developed by INDOT using an 

MOVES Vehicle analysis of permanent count station data from a 

Types) statewide data set. 

MonthVMTFraction Statewide default monthly fractions developed by 

INDOT using an analysis of permanent count 

station data from a statewide data set. 

DayVMTFraction Statewide default daily fractions developed by 

INDOT using an analysis of permanent count 

station data from a statewide data set. 

HourVMTFraction Statewide default hourly fractions developed by 

INDOT using an analysis of permanent count 

station data from a statewide data set. 

Average Speed avgSpeed National defaults. 

Distribution (% Distribution 

of VHT in each 5 

mph speed bin) 

Road Type roadType Calculated from local VMT data. Use travel 

Distribution Distribution demand model base year distributions for all 

(VMT by 5 years. 

MOVES Road 

Types) 

Age Distribution source TypeAge Local age distributions developed from vehicle 

(Vehicle Distribution registration data for source types 21, 31, and 32. 

Population by Default MOVES age distributions for all other 

Age of Vehicle) source types. 

Ramp Fraction RoadType Based on local travel demand model. 

Meteorology ZoneMonthHour MOBILE6 Summer Met Data Converted to 

Data MOVES format 

Fuel(% of FueiFormulation MOVES Defaults 

Market Share by FueiSupply Vigo County MOVES Defaults for Summer Fuel Type) (check if varies among counties) 

liM Program IMCoverage No Program 
Appendix B 

Vfao Countv Vehicle Aae Distributions for Viao Countv: 

Source Types 

aaeid 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 

0 0.2109690540 0.0212253419 0.0081779159 0.0207930917 ' 0.0643023355 0.0545743076 0.0622220043 0.0494240790 0.0588526168 0.0787544027 0.0615095870 0.05356346,60 0.0670845256 

1 0.1921154969 0.0452075694 0.0354869745 0.0502215657 0.0626728412 0.0531913309 0.0606452875 0.0481716155 0.0573612230 0.0767586735 0.0599508636 0.0535634660 0.0670845256 

2 0.1573471585 o:o488477289 0.0404:455299 0.0557891149 0.0624853859 0.0530322328 0.0604638952 0.~80275345 0.0571896519 0.0765290827 0.0597715492 0,0541045093 0,0~77621447 

3 0.1359771581 0.0455822917 0.0384103020 0.0466992387 0.0624229593 0.0529792497 0.0604034894 0.0479795509 0.0571325186 0.0764526251 0.0597118340 0.0575579884 0.0720873878 

4 0.1058454735 0.0506945746 0,0010938425 0.064878991_0_ 0.0617369906 0.0523970560 0.0597397140 0.0474523026 0.0565046834 0.0756124785 ' 0.0590556596 0.0564182312 0.0706599203 

5 0.0750909142 0.0544953294 0.0599837182 0.0656743552 0.0559170498 0.0474575929 0.0541080614 0.0429789769 0.0511779950 0.0684845018 0.0534884926 0.0489290859 0.0612802835 

6 0.0476805323. 0.0564492385 0.00287,00414 0.0585160777 0.0468365056 0.0397508123 0.0453212873 0,0359994879 0.0428670388 0.0573630890 0.0448023279_ 0.0366034411 - 0.0458432683 

7 0.0331026886 0.0630068788 0.0694937833 0.0676059539 0.0425786431 0.0361370941 0.0412011709 0.0327268079 0.0389700355 0.0521482660 0.0407293873 0.0340742206 0.0426755959 

8 0.0197278356 0.0613473943 0.0600207223 0.0580615839 0.0468268516 0.0397426124 0.0453119367 0.0359920640 0.0428582007 0.0573512681 0.0447930981, 0.0358093100 _0.0_448~86759 

9 0.0118473747 0.0728299564 0.0640171699 0.0665833428 0.0534377006 0.0453533365 0.0517089150 0.0410733035 0.0489087688 0.0654479137 0.0511168252 0.0526288382 0.0659139597 

10 0.0053251771 0.0676106100 0.0640911782 0.0587433246 0.0532712252 0.0452120443 _0.0515478328 0.0409453420 0.0487564067 0.0652440247 0.0509575859 0.0624520143 0.0782168041 

11 0.0025378610 0.0521934638 0.0564683245 0.0572662197 0.0407951886 0.0536203440 0.0411075833 0.0313560350 0.0391491717 0.0523881239 0.0302729398 0.0478258601 0.0598985955 

12 0.0013011470 0.0540135435 0.0538780343 0.0451_0851 04 0.0331924560 0.0489936472 0.0382933197 0.0255124310 0.0294483131 0.0394065607 0.0466101866 0.0389128550 0.048735417_9 

13 0.0006124019 0.0461443752 0.0408525755 0.0342006590 0.0277347637 0.0456089741 0.0333751020 0.0545980574 0.0316399801 0.0194774783 0.0291673253 0.0325145854 0.0462990441 

14 0.0002476898 0.0488477289 0.0435538780 0.0363595046 0.0364294706 0,0377746681 0.0430863640 0.0632656498 0.0364439725 0.0194691525 0.0347804437 0.0427077419 0.0462072388 

15 0.0001527705 0.0375525280 0.0415556542 0.0381774798 0.0283511969 0.0332950401 0.0210164622 0.0395649332 0.0357887614 0.0311848083 0.0335202065 0.0332372597 0.0300444032 

16 0.0000668536 0_.033965_9003 O.D_335257549 0.02783'ry"457_ 0.0235884296 0.027913_21_62 0.0253671498 0.0341566540 0.0259987277 0.0230196849 0.0233151075 0.0276536739 0.0230524492 

17 0.0000299603 0.0284521292 0.0257918887 0.0254516532 0.0175637044 0.0244970846 0.0206833627 0.0146346390 0.0197956396 0.0052258132 0.0206748599 0.0205906442 0.0138452217 

18 0.0000127409 0.0223495088 0.0235346359 0.0~78388819. 0.0201192241 0.0250480695 0.0266888558 0.0401958334 0.0193740288 ' 0.0037212159 0.0155464816 0.0235865809 O • .Q1000664-60 

19 0.0000055369 0.0173442895 0.0180210184 0.0137484377 0.0225790392 0.0366610768 0.0301447753 0.0342277190 0.0227335396 0.0175775477 0.0203628520 0.0264703224 0.0098603738 

20 0.0000022027 . 0.0152297851 '0.0181690349 ' 0.01590(2833 0.0226407923 0.0281971934 0.0173882093 0.0270081845 0.0289395633 0.0183874556 0.0265944575 0.0265427135 0.0095755112 

21 0.0000010015 0.0106528198 0.0172809355 0.0149982956 0.0212965445 0.0224413685 0.0209032932 0.0367430589 0.0255089927 0.0121624816 0.0238465850 0.0249667984 0.0083402541 

22 0.0000005320 0. 0089665694 0.0116933097 0.0120440859 0,0221366577 0.0207614938 0.0211741003 0.02942:41579 0.0211707159 0.0029207200 0.0232916866 0.0259516972 0.0021970287 

23 0.0000002372 0.0070661920 0.0112862641 _0.0090898762 0.0187753208 0.0176845935 0.0186862600 0.0367365508 0.0255742899 0.0006595597 0.0173635700 0.0220110680 0.0022815392 

24 0.0000001072 0.0058081957 0.0088069864 0.0089762527 0.0165801584 0,0153441343 0.0162223474 0.0195371739 0.0181341022 0.0013228019 0.0186391363 0.019437588~ 0.00289470e5 

25 0.0000000515 0.0040951795 0.0066607460 0.0056811726 0.0130464803 0.0119613578 0.0125269842 0.0202862884 0.0101534224 0.0013255722 0.0189070434 0.0152949162 0.0014963357 

26 0.0000000201 0.0023018656 0.0042184725 0.0042040677 0.0052066606 0.0114707358 0.0046276161 0.0058785937 0.0158244798 0.0000000000 0.0123859355 0.0061039775 0.0003051544 

27 0.0000000084 0.0015256551 0.0029603316 0.0036359505 0.0044375500 0.0062552616 0.0034269422 0.0066192300 0.0082431519 0.0005853113 0.0073123264 0.0052023202 0.0002365920 

28 0.0000000046 0.0016327186 0.0021832445 0.0031-814567 o·.oo38534093 0.0027153367 0.0040227141 0.0058648852 0.0078447522 0.0004224309 0.0040199156 0.004517.5071 0.0007539156 

29 0.0000000027 0.0015256551 0.0007770870 0.0004544938 0.0050202650 0.0073813428 0.0039557847 0.0014702211 0.0082910352 0.0000000000 0.0005297244 0.0058854602 0.0002483418 

30 0.0000000060 0.0130349830 0.0146906454 0.0122713328 0.0041641999 0.0025473919 0.0046291194 0.0021486392 0.0093642209 0.0005969550 0.0069720059 0.0048818593 0.0002641374 

Source: Quality assured vehicle registration data for Vigo County for source types 21, 32, and 32. MOVES201 Oa default distributions for all other source types. 
Appendix C 

Populations 

Annual Populations 

2008 

2009 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

2018 

2019 

2020_ 

2021 

_2022 

2023 

_2024 ___ 

2025 

2026 __ 

2027 

2028 

2029 

2030 

2031 

2032 

2033 

2034 

2035 

2036 

2037 

2038 

2039 

2040 

11 

1,652 

1,651 

1,651 

1,650 

1,649 

1,648 

1,648 

1,647 

1,646 

1,64_5 

1_,645 

1,644 

1,643 

1,642 

1_,642 

1,641 

J,640 

1,640 

1,639 

1,638 

1,637 

1,637 

1,636 

1,635 

j,634 

1,634 

1,633 

1,632 

1,631 

1,631 

1,630 

1.629 

1,629 

21 

39,546 

39,528 

39,510 

39,493 

39,475 

39,457 

39,440 

39,422 

_39,404 

39,387 

39,369 

39,351 

39,334 

_39,316 

39~299 

39,281 

39,263 

39,246 

39,228 

39,211 

39,193 

39,176 

39,158 

39,141 

39,123 

39,106 

39,088 

39,071 

_39,053 

39,036 

39,018 

39,001 

38,983 

31 

29,031 

29,018 

29,005 

28,992 

28,9_79 

28,967 

28,954 

28,941 

28,928 

28,915 

28_,902 

28,889 

28,876 

28,863 

28,850 

28,837 

28,824 

28,811 

28,7_98 

28,786 

28,7.73 

28,760 

28,747 

28,734 

28,721 

28,708 

28,696 

28,683 

28,6?',0 ' 

28,657 

28,644 

28,631 

28,619 

32 

8,888 

8,884 

8,880 

8,876 

8,873 

8,869 

8,865 

8,861 

8,857 

8,853 

8,849_ 

8,845 

8,841_ 

8,837_ 

8,833 

8,829 

8,825 

8,821 

8,817 

8,813 

8,809 

8,805 

8,801 

8,797 

8,793 

8,790 

_8;;:s6 

8,782 

8,"V8 

8,774 

8,770 

8,766 

8,762 

41 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

,31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

42 

16 

16 

'16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

_-16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

16 

Source Types 

43 51 

214 9 

213 9 

213 9 

213 9 

213 9 

213 9 

213 -g 

213 9 

213 9 

213 9 

213 -g 

212 9 

212 - 9 __ 

212 9 

212 ___ 9 

212 

212 

212 

212 

212 

212_ 

212 

211 

211 

211 __ 

211 

211 

211 

211 

211 

211 

211 

211 

9 

9, 

---- 9 __ _ 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

'' 9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

52 

640 

640 

639 

639 

639 

638 

638 

638 

638 

637 

637 __ 

637 

637 

636 

636 

636 

635 

----635 

635 

635 

634 

634 

634 

633 

633 

633 

633 

632 

632 

632 

6$2 

631 

631 

53 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 

82 __ _ 

_82 __ 

82:. 

_ 82 __ 

82 

_82_ 

82 

82 

82 

81 

81 

81 

__ 81 

81 

81 

81 

81:.,. 

81 

81 

81 

81 

54 

148 

148 

1:48 

148 

148 

148 

148 

148 

147 

147 

147 

147 

147-

147 

,147 __ 

147 

147 

14'Z 

_147 

147 

147 

147 

147 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

146 

61 

722 

722 

721 

721 

721 

720 

720 

720 

719 

719 

719 

718 

718 

_718 

--- _718 

62 

864 

863 

863 

863 

862 

862 

861 

861 

861 

860 

860 

860 

859 

859 

__ 858 

717 ______________ 858 _ 

_ _?'_17_ ---- 858_ 

7_17 

716 

716 

716 

715 

715 

715 

'71_4 

714 

714 

713 

713 

713 

713 

712 

712 

857 

857 

857 

856 

856 

855 

855 

855-, 

854 

854 

854 

,.853 

853 

852 

852 

852 

Source: Quality assured vehicle registration data for Vigo County for source types 21, 32, and 32, MOVES2010a default mileage accumulation rates for all other source types. Population growtl1 factors are taken from local socioeconomic data forecasts. 
Appendix D 

Vigo County Meteorological Data: 

monthiD zoneiD HouriD temperature reiHumidity 

7 181670 1 69.8 87.2 

7 181670 2 68.5 91.2 

7 181670 3 67.5 94.4 

7 181670 4 66.8 96.9 

7 181670 5 66.2 98.8 

7 181670 6 65.6 100.0 

7 181670 7 65.0 100.0 

7 181670 8 65.5 100.0 

7 181670 9 68.3 92.1 

7 181670 10 72.7 79.1 

7 181670 11 77.3 67.9 

7 181670 12 81.2 59.7 

7 181670 13 84.6 53.4 

7 181670 14 86.5 50.4 

7 181670 15 87.1 49.3 

7 181670 16 87.3 49.0 

7 181670 17 86.8 49.8 

7 181670 18 85.5 51.9 

7 181670 19 83.3 55.7 

7 181670 20 80.4 61.2 

7 181670 21 77.5 67.3 

7 181670 22 75.0 73.1 

7 181670 23 73.3 77.6 

7 181670 24 71.5 82.4 

Source: Mobile 6.2 reported meteorological data from Appendix C of the Request for Redesignation and 

Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the 8wHour Ozone Basic Nonattainment Area, Vigo County, 

Indiana prepared by IDEM on October, 2005 converted using EPA data converter. 
Appendix E 

Indiana Default VMT Distributions by Vehicle Type and Road Type: 

Road Light Duty Single Unit Combination 

Type Motorcycle Passen!ler Car Truck Bus Truck Truck 

2 0.007033832 0.506408086 0.163786651 0.004174166 0.007773053 0.310824213 

3 0.001733929 0.659751199 0.225767175 0.000793168 0.010963315 0.100991214 

4 0.003973041 0.56995337 4 0.254198647 0.002831718 0.009082816 0.159960404 

5 0.002785022 0.702754695 0.245240087 0.001402085 0.009764356 0.038053756 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department ofTransportation traffic count data. 
Appendix F 

Indiana Default Hourly Distribution Factors for Road Type 2- Rural Restricted Access: 

Source Types 

Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 

1 0.0125903247 0.0101219844 0.0084967341 0.0084967341 0.0254913340 0.0254913340 0.0254913340 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0126607789 0.0197906895 0.0197906895 

2 0.0104070951 0.0069241973 0.0066421955 0.0066421955 0.0269500431 0.0269500431 0.0269500431 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0114617645 0.0212124099 0.0212124099 

3 0.0098043179 0.0056567534 0.0061275627 0,0061275627 0.0231103443 0.0231103443 0.0231103443 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0107741941 0.0201622890 0.0201622890 

4 0.0140329469 0.0069658232 0.0084286563 0.0084286563 0.0234460042 0.0234460042 0.0234460042 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0128724692 0.0213065902 0.0213065902 

5 0.0165212405 0.0100941552 0.0134026652 0.0134026652 0.0244090660 0.0244090660 0.0244090660 0.0174195788 0.0174195788 0.0174195788 0.01?:4195788 0.0250478552 0.0250478552 

6 0.0312047458 0.0241732202 0.0316551315 0.0316551315 0.0322923692 0.0322923692 0.0322923692 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0261005783 0.0304976568 0.0304976568 

7 0.0399082603 0,0390974746 0.0481531313 0.0481531313 0.0302344914 . 0.0302344914 0.0302344914 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0420450985 0.0339947725 0.0339947725 

8 0.0482864956 0.0528758381 0.0535145983 0.0535145983 0.0386071681 0.0386071681 0.0386071681 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0556119122 0.0383435322 0.0383435322 

9 .0.04_72316355 0.0493101459 0.0541442978 0.0541442978 0.0454144773 0.0454144773 0.0454144773 0.0647383083 0.0647383083 0.0647383083 0,0647383083 0.0447350945 0.0447350945 

10 0.0521292001 0.0488627065 0.0570682751 0.0570682751 0.0533197396 0.0533197396 0.0533197396 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0711110358 0.0517738130 0.0517738130 

11 0.0559204481 0.0513700269 0.0575854739 0.0575854739 0.0576707709 0.0576707709 0.0576707709 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0730230234 0.0557712484 0.0557712484 

12 0.0572822100 0.0533048469 0.0582753930 0.0582753930 0.0549541212 0.0549541212 0.0549541212 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0731872952 0.0571435296 0.0571435296 

13 0.0592008057 0.0551586141 0.0599414146 0.0599414146 0.0541541840 0.0541541840 0.0541541840 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0739324454 0.0567014536 0.0567014536 . 

14 0.0615145144 0.0595500442 0.0635019874 0.0635019874 0.0570747392 0.0570747392 0.0570747392 O.D746488056 0.07 46488056 0.0746488056 0.0746488056 0.0567500887 0.0567500887 

15 0.0647783324 0.0662712693 0.0683897966 0.0683897966 0.0551925339 0.0551925339 0.0551925339 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0704234655 0.0578234055 0.0578234055 

16 0.0713500739 0.0764876319 0.0772110428 0.0772110428 0.0551956709 0.0551956709 0.0551956709 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0628601912 0.0577540296 0.0577540296 

17 ·. 0.0754978425 0.0847160034 0.0792545794 0.0792545794 0.0557979766 0.0557979766 0.0557979766 0.05347_12990 0.0534712990 0.0534712990 0.0534712990 0.0562910814 0,0562910814 

18 0,0693763461 0.0821220539 0.0693254052 0.0693254052 0.0501011685 0.0501011685 0.0501011685 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0436895095 0.0527021980 0.0527021980 

19 0.0542187052 0.0620082513 0.0521045300 0.0521045300 0.0459665909 0.0459665909 0.0459665909 0,0363413126 0.0363413126 0.0363413126 0,0363413126 0.0502215100 0.0502215100 

20 0.0432143461 0.0459015588 0.0390794599 0.0390794599 0.0462959768 0.0462959768 0.0462959768 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0312048570 0.0467116534 0.0467116534 

21 0.0358137860- 0.0372595462 0.0311015284 0.0311015284 0.0418602463 0.0418602463 0.0418602463 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0261242877 0.0421311043 0.0421311043 

22 0.0294294934 0.0312744978 0.0249803003 0.0249803003 0.0366496745 0.0366496745 0.0366496745 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0215822587 0.0381387483 0.0381387483 

23 0.0223450238 0.0235734666 0.0182964081 0.0182964081 0.0347517842 0.0347517842 0.0347517842 0,0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0189759266 0.0342326572 0.0342326572 

24 0.0179418099 0.0169198902 0.0133194323 0.0133194323 0.0310595247 0.0310595247 0.0310595247 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0157396039 0.0307625891 0.0307625891 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
In d' 1ana D efaut I H ounv I o· J 1stn 'b ut10n F actors for R oad T IVDe3- R ural u nrestncted Access: 

Source Types 

Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 

1 0.0040299464 0.0073183989 0.0054636028 0.0054636028 0.0036998387 0.0036998387 0.0036998387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0043986387 0.0164160879 0.0164160879 

2 0.0040299464 0.0041131835 0.0034619242 0.0034619242 0.0045536477 0.0045536477 0.0045536477 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0041872686 0.0167510731 0.0167510731 

3 0.0041817017 0.0032797517 0.0030691885 0.0030691885 0.0046485153 0.0046485153 0.0046485153 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 0.0073497934 O.Q165479051 0.0165479051 

4 0.0053114356 0.0057247729 0.0048082254 0.0048082254 0.0039844417 0.0039844417 0.0039844417 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0084039684 0.0195836328 0.0195836328 

5 0.0140963815 0.0151258840 0.0143177758 0.0143177758 0.0082534864 0.0082534864 0.0082534864 0.0153176438 0.0153176438 0.0153176438 0.01531~6438 0.0258467673 0.0258467673 

6 0.0292719118 0.0316782840 0.0354335195 0.0354335195 0.0293141068 0.0293141068 0.0293141068 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0299744215 0.0344245647 0.0344245647 

7 0,0397598894 0,0468485516 0.0516314034 0.0516314034 0.0496157860 0.0496157860 0.0496157860 0,0557776279 0,0557776279 0.0557776279 0.0557776279 0.0440469233 0.0440469233 

8 0.0448183995 0.0633910409 0,0636260878 0,0636260878 0.0768428043 0.0768428043 0.0768428043 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0778885464 0.0512793380 0.0512793380 .. 

9 0.0370114322 0.0460357746 0.0558633273 ~ 0.0558633273 0.1049236315 0.1049236315 0.1049236315 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0853025536 0.0568238265 0.0568238265 

10 0.0416989849 0.0427840868 0.0547852386 0.0547852386 0.1065363817 0.1065363817 0.1065363817 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0879727734 0.0599756501 0.0599756501 

11 0.0509391967 0.0444183487 0.0568454275 0.0568454275 0.1186794422 0.1186794422 0.1186794422 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0886336394 0.0633505956 0.0633505956 

12 0.0563855259 0.0512966366 0.0618918527 0.0618918527 0.1154539418 0.1154539418 0.1154539418 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0859045570 0.0635864154 0.0635864154 

13 0.0638721209 0.0537246907 0.0610818211 ~0.061081821~ 0.0999905132 ,0.0999905132 0.0999905132 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0858537212 0.0644099711 0.06440997'11 

14 0.0708697265 0.0545001954 0.0632013074 0.0632013074 0.0864244379 0.0864244379 0.0864244379 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0852196109 0.0637040231 0.0637040231 

15 ,0.0774626513 0.0656899700 0.0681384267 0.0681384267 0.0592922873 0.0592922873 0.0592922873 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0774551039 0.0609657913 0.0609657913 

16 0.0849155229 0.0775959037 0.0765115831 0.0765115831 0.0295038421 0.0295038421 0.0295038421 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0663381066 0.0570058311 0.0570058311 

17 0.0916096179 0.0871890696 0.07960~4405 0.0796014405 0.0317806660 0.0317806660 0.0317806660 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0433522764 0.0517440242 0.0517440242 

18 0.0855899909 0.0856725476 0.0737419189 0.0737419189 0.0184043260 0.0184043260 0.0184043260 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0290727541 0.0467760851 0.0467760851 

19 0.0685259502 0.0056330958 p.05452727,51 0.05452727_51_ .. 0.0120481928 .. 0.0120481928 0.0120481928 0.01877448~5 0.0187744815 0.018'7744815 0.0187744815 0.0413_186686 0.04~.3~ 86686 

20 0.0503658989 0.0457301992 0.0390975413 0.0390975413 0.0118584575 0.0118584575 0.0118584575 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0129711680 0.0364127078 0.0364127078 

21 .... 0.0353421239_ -. 0,~_0002_1,9~' - ,0.0294058~]~ ... ,0,.0294058~]1 . .. 0.00967650~3. 0.0096765013 0.0096765013 ~' 0.0106166656 0.0106166656 0.01 06166656 0.0106~_66656 -.. 0.03~88829_15 0.03_1_8882~15 

22 0.0217853168 0.0289018238 0.0218457686 0.0218457686 0,0061663979 0.0061663979 0.0061663979 0.0079972816 0.0079972816 0,0079972816 0.0079972816 0.0290264055 0.0290264055 

23 . 0.01_1_93_80838 __ -- 0.0205028665 ... 0.01;36731866 ·--· 0.0,1.36731.866 .. 0.0048382506 0.0048382506 0.0048382506 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 0.0061564888 _0.0255574344_ 0.02555743!1-4 

24 0.0061882440 0.0127827290 0.0079763402 0.0079763402 0.0035101034 0.0035101034 0.0035101034 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0050809093 0.0225579868 0.0225579868 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
Indiana Default Hourtv Distribution Factors for Road Tvpe 4 -Urban Restricted Access: 

Source Types 

Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 

1 0.0114838630 0.0104500369 0.0090397680 0.0090397680 0.0186488577 0.0186488577 0.01864B8577, 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0090968023 0.0194173119 0.0194173119 

2 0.0071800855 0.0062500477 0.0056304309 0.0056304309 0.0163411464 0.0163411464 0.0163411464 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0080102618 0.0198708197 0.0198708197 

3 0.0063691205 0.0049689741 0.0046493622 0.0046493622 0.0157775876 0.0157775876 0.0157775876 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0078361983 0.0186489893 0.0186489893 

4 0.0073777516 0.0058427101 0.0058801326 0.0058801326 0.0161766037 0.0161766037 0.0161766037 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0086827231 0.0198231326 0.0198231326 

5 0,0108139353 0.0098545059 0.0108999000 0.0108999000 0.0221330492 0.0221330492 .. 0.0221330492 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0.0117453229 0,0232515449 0.0232515449 

6 0.0235457656 0.0231603609 0.0263517526 0.0263517526 0.0299755654 0.0299755654 0.0299755654 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0204013312 0.0294638153 0.0294638153 

7 0.0461.747881 0.0495085217 0.0542414568 0.0542414568 0.0393812372 0,0393812372 0.0393812372 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0435263184 0.0375553768 0.0375553768 

8 0.0567226756 0.0788353145 0.0674512195 0.0674512195 0.0503870867 0.0503870867 0.0503870867 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0659533819 0.0446175773 0.0446175773 .. 

9 0.0493171440 0.0638279223 0.0614111771 0.0614111771 0.0589556475 0.0589556475 0.0589556475 0.0756333178 0.0756333178 0.0756333178 _0.07_56333178 _0.0515843704 0.0515843704 

10 0.0406144957 0.0466481655 0.0536303211 0.0536303211 0.0581555587 0.0581555587 0.0581555587 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0790728466 0.0553194565 0.0553194565 

11 0.0415130748 0.0428102606 0.0512594850 0.0512594850 0.0616027281 0.0616027281 0.0616027281 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0824723032 0.0583081277 0.0583081277 

12 0.0465166969 0.0452333632 0.0529793024 0.0529793024 0.0644246353 0.0644246353 0.0644246353 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0820640679 0.0589378233 0.0589378233 

13 . 0.0517959830 0.0478487216 0.0547982766 0.0547982766 0.0637644078 0.0637644078 0.0637644078 0.0808088903 0.0808088903 o.o8080S8903 0.0808088903 0.0575925555 0,0575925555 

14 0.0566713893 0.0502151226 0.0576880799 0.0576880799 0.0625591325 0.0625591325 0.0625591325 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0811795580 0.0571667797 0.0571667797 

15 0.0671882913 0.0580384620 0.0656779676 ,0.0656779576 0.0619482678 0.0619482678 0.0619482678 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 0.0795090490 o:o573429674 0.0573429674 

16 0.0810035452 0.0715596945 0.0786905659 0.0786905659 0.0609466141 0.0609466141 0.0609466141 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0727723312 0.0567213465 0.0567213465 

17 0.0863864724 ,0;0838541123 0.0821371575 0.0821371575 0.0577256909 0.0577256909 0.0577256909 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0.0563364761 0,0551911545 0.0551911545 

18 0.0843264717 0.0874512168 0.0756929494 0.0756929494 0.0510164625 0.0510164625 0.0510164625 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0371719560 0.0531125437 0.0531125437 

19 ...... 0.0645951265 . . 0_.06.0:4_364;37 4 ' 0.0543673700 . 0.0543673700 0.0450990958 .. 0.0450990958 0.0450990958 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0249336618 0.0487_1.99307 0.04871,99307 

20 0.0469536991 0.0424749554 0.0373951308 0.0373951308 0.0384927066 0.0384927066 0.0384927066 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0188134711 0.0432101938 0.0432101938 

21 0.0373781148 0.0353280630 0.029318~427 0.0293181427 0.0322318571 0.0322318571 0.0322318571 0.0162446774 0.0162446774 0.0162446774, 0.016244677~ 0.0390319248 0.039031:9248 

22 0.0316564842 0.0313403787 0.0249971308 0.0249971308 0.0282046747 0.0282046747 0.0282046747 0.0142456600 0.0142456600 0.0142456600. 0.0142456600. 0.0355118446 0.0355118446 

23 _0.0245992722 .. 0.0251562568 0.0203505544 . 0.0203505544 0.0242700475 0.0242700475 0.0242700475 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.0124474209 0.031771.165'(' ..0.0317711657 

24 0.0198157539 0.0189063955 0.0154623663 0.0154623663 0.0217813392 0.0217813392 0.0217813392 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0110419727 0.0278292477 0.0278292477 

Source: Statewide averages developed from ll"'diana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
n tana efaut ounv. tstn ut10n F actors for R oa dT 1 voe 5 -Urban Unrestncted Access: 

Source Types 

Hour 11 21 31 32 41 42 43 51 52 53 54 61 62 

1 0.0092279794 0.0085268711. 0.0060669694 0.0060669694 0.0126828270 0.0126828270 - 0.0126828270 0.0037158531 0.0037158531 0.0037158531 0.00371'58531 0.0106396358 0.0106396358 

2 0.0055316691 0.0048527626 0.0037675180 0.0037675180 0.0099485186 0.0099485186 0.0099485186 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0038117041 0.0124309233 0.0124309233 

3 0.0047273286 0.0037895145 0.0033129405 0.0033129405 0.0069482800 0.0069482800 0.0069482800 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0044165887 0.0121505035 0.0121505035 

4 0.0047017359 0,0044201159 0,0042394230 0,0042394230 0.0113599945 0.0113599945 0.0113599945 0,0056282193 0,0056282193 0.0056282193 0.0056282193 0.0144699998 0.0144699998 

5 0.0081859928 0.0079416389 0.0087215410 0.0087215410 0.0153898606 0.0153898606 0.0153898606 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0086545038 0.0210508569 0.0210508569 

6 0.0225361588 0.0203863353 0.0238668712 0.0238668712 0.0256929528 0.0256929528 0.0256929528 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0191822890 0.0299165403 0.0299165403 

7 0.0435184779 0.0478282898 0.0541952158 0.0541952158 0.0448331117 0.0448331117 0.0448331117 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0418068371 0.0436775030 0.0436775030 

8 0.0602121997 0.0721456866 0.0675347974 0.0675347974 0.0691895946 0.0691895946 0.0691895946 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0731482386 0.0588646978 0.0588646976 

9 0.0556311148 0.0567013667 0.0643860182 0.0643660182 0.0747059425 0.0747059425 0.0747059425 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0880926125 0.0640862836 0.0640862836 

10 0.0485821670 0.0466493163 0.0603283916 0.0603283916 0.0803995772 0.0803995772 0.0803995772 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0921313810 0.0680944168 0.0680944168 

11 0,0495985610 0.0468148434 0.0590657789 0.0590657789 0.0774061573 0.0774061573 0.0774061573 0.0943973720 0.0943973720 0,0943973720 0.0943973720 0.0703404942 0.0703404942 

12 0.0573056055 0.0516032787 0.0615645883 0.0615645883 0.0753332651 0.0753332651 0.0753332651 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0911430924 0.0698309800 0.0698309800 

13 0.0607752380 0.0555323143 0.0626732860 0.0626732860 0.0739763390 0.0739763390 0.0739763390 0.0895629476 0.0895629476 0.0895629476 0,0895629476 0.0685413889 0.0685413889 

14 0.0609214817 0.0562211160 0.0629887267 0.0629887267 0.0779993863 0.0779993863 0.0779993863 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0912650000 0.0671175363 0.0671175363 

15 0.0649907135 0.0607579027 0.0667909366 0.0667909366 0.0761037810 0.0761037810 0.0761037810 0.0905726397 0.0905726397 0.09057'26397 0.0905726397 0.0651260461 0.0651260461 

16 0.0724418316 0.0715477952 0.0751790074 0.0751790074 0.0728035185 0.0728035185 0.0728035185 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0775387708 0.0605241028 0.0605241028 

17 0.0773519648 0.0803647101 0,0757034489 0.0757034489 0.0526405510 0.0526405510 0.0526405510 0,0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0464337395 0.0557685235 0.0557685235 

18 0,0770777578 0.0832250581 0.0684911688 0.0684911688 0.0347686748 0.0347686748 0.0347686748 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0260342365 0.0506461891 0.0506461891 

19 0.0635977420 0.0637849687 0.0526386278 0.0526386278 0.0285090860 0.0285090860 0.0285090860 0.0}73341336 ... O.-Q1_73341336 0.0173341336 ;0.0173341336 0.0402747366 0.0402747366 

20 0.0483079600 0.0462284324 0.0372839274 0.0372839274 0.0220585728 0.0220585728 0.0220585728 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0112536468 0.0310667712 0.0310667712 

21 0.0383158572 0.0386568197 0.0292289942 . 0.0292289942 0.0174082029 0.0_1,74082029 0.0174082029 . 0.00?6615624' 0.0076615624 0.0076615624 ,0.00766f5624, 0.0268533367 0,0268533367 

22 0.0305027859 0.0325107827 0.0236169348 0.0236169348 0.0137124544 0.0137124544 0.0137124544 0,0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0062358957 0.0231915644 0.0231915644 

23 0.0214502991 0.0236017051 0.0170601049 0.0170601049 0.0139442910 0.0139442910 0,0139442910 0.0053276381 0.0053276381 0.005327638, 0,0053276381 0,0193751364. .0.0193751364,_. 

24 0.0145073780 0.0159083752 0.0113147831 0.0113147831 0.0121850602 0.0121850602 0.0121850602 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0046510979 0.0159618330 0.0159618330 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
Appendix G 

I d' (; ., D. 'b · n 1ana De ault Dally 1stn utwn Factors: 

dayiD 

monthiD 2 5 

1 0.2325411725 0.7674588275 

2 0.2380547378 0. 7619452622 

3 0.2393402049 0.7606597951 

4 0.2396052454 0. 7603947546 

5 0.2484757701 0.7515242299 

6 0.2489743665 0.7510256335 

7 0.2481153021 0.751884697.9 

8 0.2527028648 0.7472971352 

9 0.2496078420 0. 7503921580 

10 0.2462808693 0.7537191307 

11 0.2439742406 0.7560257594 

12 0.2258784720 0.7741215280 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
Appendix H 

Indiana Default Monthly Distribution Factors: 

mont hiD monthVMTFraction 

1 0.0733424010 

2 0.0693661929 

3 0.0827036024 

4 0.0831789580 

5 0.0891346903 

6 0.0888150873 

7 0.0907968617 

8 0.0918542094 

9 0.0854175366 

10 0.0875162272 

11 0.0812354405 

12 0.0766387926 

Source: Statewide averages developed from Indiana Department of Transportation traffic count data. 
Appendix I 

Vigo County Ramp Fractions: 

Road Type 

2 

4 

Ramp 

Fraction 

O% 

5.73% 

Source: Analysis of VHT from the Terre Haute travel demand model. 
AppendixB 

Vigo, Indiana, Maintenance Area 

Interagency Consultation Group 

Meeting Minutes/Summary 
This page left intentionally blank 
Interagency Consultation Group (ICG) Conference Call Minutes 

For the MOBILE6.2 to MOVES MVEB Replacement Update 

Related to the Vigo County, Indiana, Maintenance Area under 

the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard 

ICG Conference Call Date and Time 

• February 13,2013 at 1pm Eastem 

ICG Attendees 

• Shawn Seals (IDEM), Anthony Maietta (EPA),Greg Katter (INDOT), Larry Heil 

(FHW A), Ron Hinsenkamp (WCIEDD), Dan White (WCIEDD), Seyed 

Shokouhzadeh (EMPO), and Vishu Lingala (EMPO) 

ICG Discussion Topics and Conclusions 

1. For the PM2.5 MVEB Replacement submittal, various mobile source margins of 

safety were discussed. 

A. After discussion, the consensus of the ICG was that as long as the a 15% 

mobile source margin of safety for VOC and NOx emissions does not result in 

an exceedance of the all sources margins of safety, it was reasonable and 

appropriate for inclusion in MVEB replacement submittal. 

B-1 
This page intentionally left blank.