alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeDivision for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions...Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions  Releases

# Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions Releases

285 items

        -    		Syria Sanctions	   
        -    		South Sudan Sanctions	   
        -    		Zimbabwe Sanctions	   
        -    		Sudan Sanctions	   
        -    		Somalia Sanctions	   
        -    		Venezuela-Related Sanctions	   
        -    		Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Sanctions	   
        -    		Iran Sanctions	   
        -    		Nicaragua Sanctions	   
        -    		Cyber Sanctions	   

previous page1…242526272829next page

Back to Top
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Robert Russell, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  Telcommunication
Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 8, 2003


/s/ Robert Russell
- -----------------------
 Robert Russell, CEO & CFO
#### DeBeck, etc., *v.*DeBeck et al.

[No. 20,463.

Filed February 24, 1966.]

*Wilfred J. Mayetie*and *Bo enter and Mayette,*of South Bend, for appellant.

*419
      *James V. Donadío*and *Ice, Miller, Donadío & Ryan,*of Indianapolis, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appellees herein have filed their verified petition to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellant’s brief was not filed within thirty days after submission as required by Rule 2-15, Rules of the Supreme Court, 1964 Edition. Appellant has filed no answer to said petition.

The record discloses that the transcript and assignment of errors herein were filed with the Clerk of this Court on January 3, 1966. Therefore, appellant’s time within which to file brief expired on February 2, 1966. Appellant’s brief was stamped “Received Feb. 4, 1966” by the Clerk of this Court. Rule 2-15, *supra,*provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

> “The appellant shall have thirty (30) days after submission in which to file his brief, and if the brief is not filed within the time limited the clerk shall enter an order dismissing the appeal, unless a petition for extension of time is on file.”

This being an appeal from an award of the Industrial Board, no extension of time may be granted for the filing of briefs. Rule 2-16, Rules of the Supreme Court. Appellant’s brief was tendered for filing herein two days late.

Appellant having failed to file his brief within the required period of time, this appeal is subject to be dismissed pursuant to Rule 2-15, *supra. Wells*v. *American Maize Products Co.*(1964), 136 Ind. App. 595, 201 N. E. 2d 292 (Transfer dismissed.)

Appellees’ verified petition to dismiss is hereby sustained; and the Clerk of this Court is hereby ordered to dismiss the appeal herein for failure to comply with Rules 2-15 and 2-16, *supra.*

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 185.