alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NARCISO BASSO v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in O. Cls. R.; 239 U. S. R., 602.]

*On the plaintiff's appeal.*

No opinion was delivered by the court below, but judgment was rendered for the defendants on the question of jurisdiction. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided :

The rule that the Court of Claims has not jurisdiction of actions founded on tort is based on a policy imposed by the necessity that governments are not liable for unauthorized wrongs inflicted on the citizens by their officers, even though occurring while engaged in discharge of official duties. *Sohillinger*v. *United States,*155 U. S. 163.

Congress has wisely reserved to itself the right to give or withhold relief where the claim is founded on the wrongful proceedings of an officer of the Government. *SehAlUnger*v. *United States,*155 U. S. 163.

*482Neither *Dooley*v. *United States,*182 U. S. 222, nor *United States*v. *Lynah,*188 U. S. 445, sustaining jurisdiction of the Court of Claims in cases respectively to recover sums wrongfully exacted for taxes and for compensation for property taken for public purposes, overrules, or is antagonistic to *Sclbillkiger*v. *United States,*155 U. S. 163, which is subsisting authority of this court that the Court of Claims has no jurisdiction of an action for a claim for private injury to an individual through the tortious act of an officer of the United States.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 17, 1916.
Exhibit 35.5  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and
among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2016-CD2 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019. LOGOLeslie Hayton
Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs...Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Releases

453 items

        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Exchange Programs Support Global Efforts to Combat Illicit Synthetic Drugs	  May 9, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program Offer and Designation of a Senior Leader of Russia-Based Ransomware Group LockBit	  Matthew MillerMay 7, 2024 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Lockbit Ransomware Administrator Dmitry Yuryevich Khoroshev	  May 7, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Robinson Travels to Saint Lucia, Barbados, and Trinidad and Tobago	  May 6, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		An International Response to Combatting Synthetic Drugs	  Todd D.  RobinsonApril 17, 2024Wednesday, April 17, 2024, 10:30 a.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    		Reviews of U.S. Anti-Corruption Efforts	   
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Spain Central America Working Group	  April 2, 2024 
        -    Testimony  		Testimony Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Implementation of the U.S. Anti-Corruption Strategy	  Richard NephewMarch 21, 2024Senate Foreign Relations CommitteeWashington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote  		From the Secretary’s Desk: Tackling the Synthetic Drug Crisis through Global Solutions	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Fentanyl Precursor Scheduling at the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs	  March 21, 2024 

123…46next page

Back to Top
#### § 406.3 Forfeiture of gold valued not in excess of $2,500.

The district director of customs receiving custody of gold seized by the Secret Service, shall, if no petition is filed for the remission of mitigation of the forfeiture incurred, institute summary forfeiture proceedings in the judicial district in which such seizure is made under the appropriate provisions of the law and Customs Regulations applicable to the forfeiture of merchandise imported contrary to law.
HomeArgentina

# Argentina

137 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to Argentina	  January 23, 2023 
        -    TIAS  		Argentina (23-101.1) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement FATCA	  January 1, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Statement by U.S. Delegation at Eighth Plenary Session	  Beth Van SchaackDecember 9, 2022Eighth Assembly of State Parties Plenary SessionThe Hague, The Netherlands 
        -    Other Release  		Statement of the United States at the 21st Session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court	  Beth Van SchaackDecember 6, 202221st Session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal CourtThe Hague, Netherlands 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks for Dedication of ESMA Memorial Space at Embassy of Argentina	  Uzra ZeyaOctober 18, 2022Embassy of ArgentinaWashington, DC 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Indonesia:  Peacekeeping Exercise Garuda Canti Dharma II Helps Partners Develop Critical Capabilities	  October 18, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Ambassador-at-Large Beth Van Schaack’s Remarks to the Case Western Reserve University School of Law: "International Law & The New Cold War"	  Beth Van SchaackSeptember 30, 2022Case Western Reserve University School of LawCleveland, Ohio 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Atlantic Cooperation	  September 20, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy to Advance the Human Rights of LGBTQI+ Persons Stern’s Travel to Argentina, Peru, and Panama	  September 5, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Argentina 	  July 28, 2022 

previous page1…34567…14next page

Back to Top
#### § 562.304 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
#### Woodrow DILLEY and Al Johnson. v. Mrs. Minnie CAIN

No. 64527.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

In re Mrs. Minnie Cain applying for writ of certiorari, Second Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 13,791. Parish of Franklin.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, C. J., MARCUS and BLANCHE, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiffs, *against*Jacob Grossman *et al.,*Defendants.

(Decided June 3d, 1889.)

On an application to vacate a judgment on a forfeited recognizance taken in a prosecution for' assault, and battery, the surety produced the record of the court in such proceeding, showing that the complainant therein appeared and acknowledged satisfaction for the assault and.battery, and that, on his request, defendant was discharged, and also an affidavit of' his attorney that the complainant, after diligent search, could not be found. *Held,*that the application should be granted.

Motion to vacate a judgment entered upon a forfeited recognizance.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*David Hirshfield,*for the motion.

*John R. Fellows,*District Attorney, opposed.

Per Curiam.

A motion to vacate this judgment was made at the General Term in March last, and was denied upon the grounds stated in a memorandum of the court. The motion is now renewed upon fuller papers. The memorandum made by the court upon the first application indicated that there was not sufficient proof that.the complain*312ant appeared before the Court of Special Sessions, and refused to prosecute the defendant Grossman for the assault and battery with which he bad charged him. The record of the court that the complainant declined to prosecute and an affidavit of the complainant, with a due identification, would present the most satisfactory evidence of this fact. It appears from the papers now before us that the applicant has endeavored to present this evidence. He has produced the record of the court showing that the complainant appeared and acknowledged satisfaction for the injury received, and requested the discharge of the defendant, who was then discharged. He has also shown by the affidavit of his attorney, that diligent search has been made for the complainant for the purpose of obtaining from him an affidavit, and that he cannot be found. We think that, under the circumstances, the surety is entitled to an order remitting the forfeiture and vacating the judgment entered on the recognizance.

Application granted.
HomeBiographies...Thomas L. Vajda

# 				Ambassador Thomas L. Vajda			

															Dean, Leadership and Management School						Foreign Service Institute												

				September 25, 2023 -									Present							

Thomas L. Vajda, a Foreign Service Officer with the rank of Career Minister, is the Dean of the Leadership and Management School at the Foreign Service Institute.  In this capacity he oversees rank- and position-based leadership and crisis management training for foreign affairs professionals to face global leadership challenges throughout their careers.

In his most recent roles, Thomas Vajda served as a Senior Visiting Fellow at the U.S. Institute for Peace and from 2021-2022 as the U.S. Ambassador to Burma (Myanmar), where he led the U.S. in-country response to the February 2021 military coup and efforts to support a democratic restoration. Previously he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs and in various other Bureau roles, including Senior Bureau Official and Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary.

Ambassador Vajda also served as U.S. Consul General in Mumbai, India; Deputy Coordinator for Assistance to the Middle East; and Deputy Chief of Mission in Rangoon, Burma.  He held earlier positions in Germany, Albania, and South Korea and in numerous capacities at State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Ambassador Vajda is originally from Phoenix, Arizona and holds a Bachelor’s Degree from Stanford University and a Master’s Degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.  He is married to Amy Sebes, and they have two daughters.

Tags

Foreign Service InstituteState Department Official

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Saul Jesus Diaz  Diaz Herrera

# 				 Saul Jesus Diaz  Diaz Herrera			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				March 20, 2002			

**Peruvian National Police Department image**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialPeru

Back to Top
§ 576.516 Transactions related to the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components, or software updates for personal, non-commercial use. ( a ) All transactions prohibited by this part that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Agricultural commodities.* For the purposes of this section, agricultural commodities are: ( i ) Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and
( ii ) That are intended for ultimate use as: ( A ) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);
( B ) Seeds for food crops;
( C ) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or
( D ) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.
( 2 ) *Medicine.* For the purposes of this section, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
( 3 ) *Medical devices.* For the purposes of this section, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
Note 1 to § 576.516 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78497, Dec. 21, 2022]
#### § 510.324 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property. Without limitation on the foregoing, it shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1397 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1397

To authorize the President to transfer 28 F-16 aircraft and associated 
 spare parts and support equipment to Pakistan pursuant to agreements 
                between the United States and Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

 Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Torricelli) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the President to transfer 28 F-16 aircraft and associated 
 spare parts and support equipment to Pakistan pursuant to agreements 
                between the United States and Pakistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER F-16 AIRCRAFT TO PAKISTAN.

    Notwithstanding section 620E(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961 (22 U.S.C. 2375(e)), the President is authorized to transfer 28 F-
16 aircraft and associated spare parts and support equipment to 
Pakistan pursuant to agreements between the United States and Pakistan 
entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DOE Designs - 2011/09/09 LF Engineering Data File

Lowest Price Designs in a dEL Range by Core Material - PGE Analysis 11/6/11

DL1 - 50 kVA 1-Phase Pad DL2 - 25 kVA 1-Phase Pole Type (Round)

M3 M2 ZDMH SA1 M3 M2 ZDMH SA1

dEL0 $ 1,961 $ 2,052 $ 1,957 $ 2,284 dEL0 $ 1,307 $ 1,260 $ 936 $ 1,277

dEL1 $ 2,178 $ 2,322 $ 2,187 $ 2,284 dEL1 $ 1,516 $ 1,551 $ 1,091 $ 1,342

dEL2 $ 2,744 $ 2,659 $ 2,319 $ 2,284 dEL2 $ 1,240 $ 1,381

dEL3 $ 2,924 $ 2,886 $ 2,319 $ 2,284 dEL3 $ 1,316 $ 1,434

dEL4 $ 2,378 dEL4 $ 1,504

dEL5 $ 2,626 dEL5 $ 1,728

TRP-11/6/2011

$1,900 

$2,100 

$2,300 

$2,500 

$2,700 

$2,900 

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5

M3

M2

ZDMH

SA1

$800 

$900 

$1,000 

$1,100 

$1,200 

$1,300 

$1,400 

$1,500 

$1,600 

$1,700 

$1,800 

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5

M3

M2

ZDMH

SA1

DOE Designs Simplified Plots with Data - 2011-09-09 Engineering Data File - PGE Analysis 2011-11-06 - R1.xls - DL1 and 2
Exhibit 34.17  LOGO Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To Torchlight Loan Services, LLC We have examined management of
Torchlight Loan Services, LLC (Torchlight)s assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
the special servicing platform (Platform) for commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction that were issued on or after December 1, 2002 for which Torchlight acted as the special servicer included in the accompanying
Managements Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Torchlights management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination. Management has determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122
(d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by
Torchlight, as a special servicer, with respect to the Companys Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in the accompanying Managements Certification
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation
standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether managements assertion is fairly stated, in
all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about managements assertion. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of managements assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Torchlights compliance with the specified requirements. In our opinion, managements assertion that Torchlight complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item
1122 of Regulation AB included in the accompanying Managements Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria on SEC Regulation AB is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ CohnReznick LLPBethesda, MarylandFebruary 25, 2019
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nemias CRUZ-BURGOS, a.k.a. Gabriel Espinoza Castillo, and Nemias Burgos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-50227.

D.C. No. CR-98-01290-WMB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 21, 2001.

*448Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Nemias Cruz-Burgos appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Cruz-Bur-gos contends that his plea should be set aside because the district court failed to inform him in open court of the nature of the charges, as required by Fed. R.Crim. P. 11(c)(1). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate Cruz-Burgos’ plea and conviction and remand to the district court to allow him to plead anew.

We review de novo whether the district court’s Rule 11 plea colloquy with the defendant satisfies the requirements of Rule 11(c)(1) and whether the Rule 11 hearing was otherwise adequate. *United States v. Alber,*56 F.3d 1106, 1109 (9th Cir.1995). The determination of whether a plea was voluntary is also reviewed de novo. *United States v. Roberts,*5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir.1993).

Upon review of the record of the plea proceedings, we conclude that the district court failed to explain the nature of the charges for which Cruz-Burgos was indicted, rendering the plea colloquy deficient. *See United States v. Portillo-Cano,*192 F.3d 1246, 1250-51 (9th Cir.1999); *see also United States v. Smith,*60 F.3d 595, 597 (9th Cir.1995) (stating factual recitations and a defendant’s admissions thereto do not satisfy the requirements of Rule 11(c)).

Because the defendant’s right to be informed of the charges against him is at the core of Rule 11, which exists to guarantee that pleas are knowing and voluntary, this error was not harmless. *United States v. Longoria,*113 F.3d 975, 977 (9th Cir.1997). As such, the district court’s failure to explain the nature of the charges to Cruz-Burgos requires vacation of the guilty plea. *Smith,*60 F.3d at 597. The plea and conviction are vacated and we remand for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 525.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.